WAVEDANCER, INC. - Quarter Report: 2017 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
☑
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File
Number 000-22405
Information Analysis
Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia
|
|
54-1167364
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
11240 Waples Mill Road
Suite 201
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)
(703) 383-3000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area
code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed
since last report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has
submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§
232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files). Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer”, “smaller reporting company” and "emerging
growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
☐
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☒
|
|
|
Emerging
growth company
|
☐
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐ No ☑
As
of May 5, 2017, 11,201,760 shares of common stock, par value $0.01
per share, of the registrant were outstanding.
INFORMATION ANALYSIS INCORPORATED
FORM 10-Q
Index
|
|
Page
Number
|
PART I.
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements (unaudited except for the balance sheet as of
December 31, 2016)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2017 and December 31,
2016
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017
and 2016
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2017
and 2016
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
6
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
|
11
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
13
|
|
|
|
PART II.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
14
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
14
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
14
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
14
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
14
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other Information
|
14
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
14
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
15
|
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
INFORMATION ANALYSIS INCORPORATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
March
31,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(see
Note 1)
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$1,762,522
|
$1,895,372
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
1,055,404
|
1,157,387
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
433,136
|
663,556
|
Notes
receivable, current
|
4,162
|
2,630
|
Total
current assets
|
3,255,224
|
3,718,945
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
21,679
|
27,198
|
Other
assets
|
6,281
|
6,281
|
Total
assets
|
$3,283,184
|
$3,752,424
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$234,911
|
$48,974
|
Commissions
payable
|
816,840
|
853,340
|
Deferred
revenue
|
365,132
|
615,035
|
Accrued
payroll and related liabilities
|
226,769
|
206,475
|
Other
accrued liabilities
|
38,982
|
396,081
|
Total
liabilities
|
1,682,634
|
2,119,905
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|
|
Common
stock, par value $0.01, 30,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
12,844,376
shares issued, 11,201,760 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2017
and December 31, 2016
|
128,443
|
128,443
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
14,631,009
|
14,631,362
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(12,228,691)
|
(12,197,075)
|
Treasury
stock, 1,642,616 shares at cost
|
(930,211)
|
(930,211)
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
1,600,550
|
1,632,519
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$3,283,184
|
$3,752,424
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial
statements
3
INFORMATION ANALYSIS INCORPORATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
Professional
fees
|
$1,020,033
|
$841,037
|
Software
sales
|
461,615
|
627,289
|
Total
revenues
|
1,481,648
|
1,468,326
|
|
|
|
Cost
of revenues:
|
|
|
Cost
of professional fees
|
534,746
|
548,393
|
Cost
of software sales
|
447,057
|
562,260
|
Total
cost of revenues
|
981,803
|
1,110,653
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
499,845
|
357,673
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
418,786
|
516,970
|
Commissions
expense
|
114,633
|
53,403
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
(33,574)
|
(212,700)
|
|
|
|
Other
income
|
1,958
|
2,430
|
|
|
|
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
(31,616)
|
(210,270)
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(31,616)
|
$(210,270)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per common share:
|
|
|
Basic
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.02)
|
Diluted
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.02)
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
Basic
|
11,201,760
|
11,201,760
|
Diluted
|
11,201,760
|
11,201,760
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial
statements
4
INFORMATION ANALYSIS INCORPORATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
For the three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(31,616)
|
$(210,270)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
|
|
(used
in) provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
5,519
|
7,779
|
Stock-based
compensation, net of forfeitures
|
(353)
|
666
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
101,983
|
588,120
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
230,420
|
184,925
|
Accounts
payable
|
185,937
|
29,137
|
Accrued
payroll and related liabilities, and other
|
|
|
accrued liabilities
|
(336,805)
|
(56,516)
|
Commissions
payable
|
(249,903)
|
(101,487)
|
Deferred
revenue
|
(36,500)
|
(212,438)
|
|
|
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
(131,318)
|
229,916
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
Acquisition
of property and equipment
|
-
|
(7,158)
|
Increase
in notes receivable - employees
|
(2,500)
|
(5,768)
|
Payments
received on notes receivable - employees
|
968
|
280
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,532)
|
(12,646)
|
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(132,850)
|
217,270
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
|
1,895,372
|
2,167,928
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of the period
|
$1,762,522
|
$2,385,198
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
cash flow information
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
$-
|
$-
|
Income
taxes paid
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial
statements
5
INFORMATION ANALYSIS INCORPORATED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Business
Founded
in 1979, Information Analysis Incorporated (“We”, the
“Company”), to which we sometimes refer as IAI, is in
the business of developing and maintaining information technology
(IT) systems, modernizing client information systems, and
performing professional services to government and commercial
organizations. We presently concentrate our technology, services
and experience to developing web-based and mobile device solutions
(including electronic forms conversions), data analytics, cyber
security applications, and legacy software migration and
modernization for various agencies of the federal government. We
provide software and services to government and commercial
customers throughout the United States, with a concentration in the
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
Unaudited Interim Financial Statements
The
accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the
instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP
have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”). In the opinion of management, the unaudited
financial statements include all adjustments necessary (which are
of a normal and recurring nature) for the fair and not misleading
presentation of the results of the interim periods presented. These
unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with
our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2016 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by the
Company with the SEC on March 31, 2017 (the “Annual
Report”). The accompanying December 31, 2016 balance sheet
and financial information was derived from our audited financial
statements included in the Annual Report. The results of operations
for any interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations for any other interim period or for a full
fiscal year.
There
have been no changes in the Company’s significant accounting
policies as of March 31, 2017 as compared to the significant
accounting policies disclosed in Note 1, "Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 that was filed with the
SEC on March 31, 2017.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results can, and in many cases will,
differ from those estimates.
Income Taxes
As of
March 31, 2017, there have been no material changes to the
Company’s uncertain tax position disclosures as provided in
Note 7 of the Annual Report. The Company does not anticipate that
total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change prior to
March 31, 2018.
The
Company earns revenue from both professional services and sales of
software and related support. The Company recognizes revenue when a
contract has been executed, the contract price is fixed and
determinable, delivery of services or products has occurred, and
collectability of the contract price is considered probable and can
be reasonably estimated. Revenue from professional services is
earned under time and materials and fixed-price contracts. For
sales of third-party software products, revenue is recognized upon
product delivery, with any maintenance related revenues recognized
ratably over the maintenance period.
Revenue
on time and materials contracts is recognized based on direct labor
hours expended at contract billing rates and adding other billable
direct costs.
For
fixed-price contracts that are based on unit pricing, the Company
recognizes revenue for the number of units delivered in any given
reporting period.
For
fixed-price contracts in which the Company is paid a specific
amount to be available to provide a particular service for a stated
period of time, revenue is recognized ratably over the service
period. The Company applies this method of revenue recognition to
renewals of maintenance contracts on third-party software sales and
to separable maintenance elements of sales of third-party software
that include fixed terms of maintenance, such as Adobe and Micro
Focus software, for which the Company is responsible for
“first line support” to the customer and for serving as
a liaison between the customer and the third-party maintenance
provider for issues the Company is unable to resolve.
6
The
Company reports revenue on both gross and net bases on a
transaction by transaction analysis using authoritative guidance
issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
“FASB”). The Company considers the following factors to
determine the gross versus net presentation: if the Company (i)
acts as principal in the transaction; (ii) takes title to the
products; (iii) has risks and rewards of ownership, such as the
risk of loss for collection, delivery or return; and (iv) acts as
an agent or broker (including performing services, in substance, as
an agent or broker) with compensation on a commission or fee basis.
Generally, sales of third-party software products such as Adobe and
Micro Focus products are reported on a gross basis with the Company
acting as the principal in these arrangements. This determination
is based on the following: 1) the Company has inventory risk as
suppliers are not obligated to accept returns, 2) the Company has
reasonable latitude, within economic constraints, in establishing
price, 3) the Company, in its marketing efforts, frequently aids
the customer in determining product specifications, 4) the Company
has physical loss and inventory risk as title transfers at the
shipping point, 5) the Company bears full credit risk, and 6) the
amount the Company earns in the transaction is neither a fixed
dollar amount nor a fixed percentage. Generally, revenue derived
for facilitating a sales transaction of Adobe products in which a
customer introduced by the Company makes a purchase directly from
the Company’s supplier or another designated reseller is
recognized net when the commission payment is received since the
Company is merely acting as an agent in these arrangements. Since
the Company is not a direct party in the sales transaction, payment
by the supplier is the Company’s confirmation that the sale
occurred.
For
software and software-related multiple element arrangements, the
Company must: (1) determine whether and when each element has been
delivered; (2) determine whether undelivered products or services
are essential to the functionality of the delivered products and
services; (3) determine the fair value of each undelivered element
using vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE"), and (4) allocate
the total price among the various elements. Changes in assumptions
or judgments or changes to the elements in a software arrangement
could cause a material increase or decrease in the amount of
revenue that the Company reports in a particular
period.
The
Company determines VSOE for each element based on historical
stand-alone sales to third parties or from the stated renewal rate
for the elements contained in the initial arrangement. The Company
has established VSOE for its third-party software maintenance and
support services.
The
Company’s contracts with agencies of the U.S. federal
government are subject to periodic funding by the respective
contracting agency. Funding for a contract may be provided in full
at inception of the contract, ratably throughout the contract as
the services are provided, or subject to funds made available
incrementally by legislators. In evaluating the probability of
funding for purposes of assessing collectability of the contract
price, the Company considers its previous experiences with its
customers, communications with its customers regarding funding
status, and the Company’s knowledge of available funding for
the contract or program. If funding is not assessed as probable,
revenue recognition is deferred until realization is deemed
probable.
Payments received
in advance of services performed are recorded and reported as
deferred revenue. Services performed prior to invoicing customers
are recorded as unbilled accounts receivable and are presented on
the Company’s balance sheets in the aggregate with accounts
receivable.
Prompt
payment discounts taken and expected to be taken by customers in
conjunction with orders received under the Company’s General
Services Administration Multiple Award Schedule (“GSA
Schedule”) are reflected as a reduction in the
Company’s revenue.
2.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
From
time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), or other standard
setting bodies that the Company adopts as of the specified
effective date.
In May
2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No.
2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts
with Customers (Topic 606)" (“ASU
2014-09”). This new
standard will supercede nearly all existing revenue recognition
guidance in U.S. GAAP. The core principle of the ASU is that an
entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or
services equal to the amount it expects to receive for those goods
and services. The standard defines a five step process to achieve
this core principle and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment
and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition
process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP, including
identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the
amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction
price and allocating the transaction price to each separate
performance obligation. The standard allows entities to apply
either of two adoption methods: (a) retrospective application to
each prior reporting period presented with the option to elect
certain practical expedients as defined within ASU 2014-09; or (b)
retrospective application with the cumulative effect of initially
applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application
and providing certain additional disclosures as defined per ASU
2014-09. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers:
Topic 606” ("ASU 2015-14"), which defers the effective
date for ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that
reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016,
including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.
The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting this new standard
on its financial statements and the method of adoption. While the
amount of disclosures and types of disclosures will change
regarding revenue recognition, the Company believes the ultimate
impact of adopting this new standard will be the potential for
moderate shifts in the timing of revenue recognition from certain
types of customer contracts.
7
There
have been three new ASUs issued amending certain aspects of ASU
2014-09. ASU 2016-08, "Principal
versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross Versus
Net)," was issued in March 2016 to clarify certain aspects
of the principal versus agent guidance in ASU 2014-09. In addition,
ASU 2016-10, "Identifying
Performance Obligations and Licensing" issued in April 2016,
amends other sections of ASU 2014-09 including clarifying guidance
related to identifying performance obligations and licensing
implementation. Finally, ASU 2016-12, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers -
Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients" provides
amendments and practical expedients to the guidance in ASU 2014-09
in the areas of assessing collectability, presentation of sales
taxes received from customers, noncash consideration, contract
modification and clarification of using the full retrospective
approach to adopt ASU 2014-09. With its evaluation of the impact of
ASU 2014-09, the Company is also evaluating the financial statement
impact related to the updated guidance provided by these three new
ASUs.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases: Topic 842,” which
provided updated guidance on lease accounting. ASU 2016-02 is
effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2018, including interim periods within that annual period, with
early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of
adopting this new standard on its financial
statements.
In
August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and
Cash Payments,” to provide additional guidance and
reduce diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash
payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash
flows. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period. The Company does not expect the
adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its
financial statements.
3.
Stock-Based
Compensation
During
the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company had two
shareholder–approved stock-based compensation plans. The 2006
Stock Incentive Plan was adopted in 2006 (“2006 Plan”)
and had options granted under it through April 12, 2016. On June 1,
2016, the shareholders ratified the IAI 2016 Stock Incentive Plan
(“2016 Plan”), which had been approved by the Board of
Directors on April 4, 2016.
2016 Stock Incentive Plan
The
2016 Plan became effective June 1, 2016, and expires April 4, 2026.
The 2016 Plan provides for the granting of equity awards to key
employees, including officers and directors. Options under the 2016
Plan are generally granted at-the-money or above, expire no later
than ten years from the date of grant or within three months of
when employment ceases, whichever comes first, and vest over
periods determined by the Board of Directors. The number of shares
subject to options available for issuance under the 2016 Plan
cannot exceed 1,000,000. At March 31, 2017, there were no options
yet issued under the 2016 Plan.
2006 Stock Incentive Plan
The
2006 Plan became effective May 18, 2006, and expired April 12,
2016. The 2006 Plan provides for the granting of equity awards to
key employees, including officers and directors. Options under the
2016 Plan were generally granted at-the-money or above, expire no
later than ten years from the date of grant or within three months
of when employment ceases, whichever comes first, and vest over
periods determined by the Board of Directors. The number of shares
subject to options available for issuance under the 2006 Plan could
not exceed 1,950,000. There were 1,289,500 and 1,240,000 unexpired
options remaining from the 2006 Plan at March 31, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
8
The
Company estimates the fair value of options granted using a
Black-Scholes valuation model to establish the expense. When
stock-based compensation is awarded to employees, the expense is
recognized ratably over the vesting period. When stock-based
compensation is awarded to non-employees, the expense is recognized
over the period of performance. The fair values of option awards
granted in the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, were
estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the
following assumptions:
|
|
Three Months
ended March
31,
|
||
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Risk
free interest rate
|
|
n/a
|
|
1.15% -
1.55%
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
n/a
|
|
0%
|
Expected
term
|
|
n/a
|
|
5
years
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
n/a
|
|
34.9% -
35.0%
|
A
summary of the activity under the stock incentive plans as of March
31, 2017, and changes during the quarter then ended is presented
below.
Incentive
Options
|
Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining Contractual Term
|
Aggregate
IntrinsicValue
|
Outstanding at
January 1, 2017
|
1,313,000
|
$0.22
|
|
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Expired
|
(3,500)
|
0.42
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
(20,000)
|
0.13
|
|
|
Outstanding at
March 31, 2017
|
1,289,500
|
$0.22
|
4.9
|
$37,098
|
Exercisable at
March 31, 2017
|
1,269,500
|
$0.23
|
4.8
|
$35,898
|
There
were no options granted during the three months ended March 31,
2017, and the weighted-average grant date fair value of options
granted during the three months ended March 31, 2016, was $0.04.
There were no options exercised during the three months ended March
31, 2017 and 2016. As of March 31, 2017, there was $250 of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based
compensation arrangements granted under the stock incentive plans;
that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of four months.
Total
compensation expense related to these plans was $259 and $666 for
the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, none of
which related to options awarded to non-employees. Compensation
expense relating to prior periods of $612 were reversed in the
quarter ended March 31, 2017, from options that were forfeited
prior to vesting.
Nonvested option
awards as of March 31, 2017 and changes during the three months
ended March 31, 2017 were as follows:
|
Shares
|
Weighted average
grant date fair value
|
Nonvested at
January 1, 2017
|
45,000
|
$0.07
|
Granted
|
-
|
|
Vested
|
(5,000)
|
0.08
|
Forfeited
|
(20,000)
|
0.04
|
Nonvested at March
31, 2017
|
20,000
|
$0.05
|
4.
Revolving
line of Credit
The
Company has a revolving line of credit with a bank providing for
demand or short-term borrowings of up to $1,000,000. The line
expires on May 31, 2017. As of March 31, 2017, the Company was in
default of a covenant to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of
$1,800,000. The Company’s bank has issued a waiver of the
default through the expiration of the current term of the line of
credit. At that time the bank will review the Company’s
balance sheets and results of operations for 2017. The Company
anticipates the bank will renew its line of credit with some
adjustment to terms, covenants, or both, but can provide no
assurance that the bank will indeed renew the line of credit nor
renew it under terms deemed favorable to the Company. As of March
31, 2017, no amounts were outstanding under this line of credit.
The Company did not borrow against this line of credit in the last
twelve months.
9
5.
Loss
Per Share
Basic
loss per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing loss
available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share reflects
the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other
contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into
common stock, except for periods when the Company reports a net
loss because the inclusion of such items would be antidilutive. The
antidilutive effect of 179,490 and 27,097 shares from stock options
were excluded from diluted shares as of March 31, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
The
following is a reconciliation of the amounts used in calculating
basic and diluted net loss per common share:
|
Net Loss
|
Shares
|
Per Share Amount
|
Basic
net loss per common share for the three months ended March 31,
2017:
|
|
|
|
Loss
available to common stockholders
|
$(31,616)
|
11,201,760
|
$0.00
|
Effect
of dilutive stock options
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Diluted
net loss per common share for the three months ended March 31,
2017
|
$(31,616)
|
11,201,760
|
$0.00
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
net loss per common share for the three months ended March 31,
2016:
|
|
|
|
Loss
available to common stockholders
|
$(210,270)
|
11,201,760
|
$(0.02)
|
Effect
of dilutive stock options
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Diluted
net loss per common share for the three months ended March 31,
2016
|
$(210,270)
|
11,201,760
|
$(0.02)
|
6.
Financial
Instruments
Fair Value Measurements
Fair
value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an
asset or be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most
advantageous market in an orderly transaction. To increase
consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the FASB
established a three-level hierarchy which requires an entity to
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of
fair value measurements are:
●
Level
1—Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are
accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The
fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1
inputs.
●
Level
2—Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on
active markets, but corroborated by market data.
●
Level
3—Unobservable inputs that are used when little or no market
data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest
priority to Level 3 inputs.
The inputs used in measuring the fair value of cash and cash
equivalents are considered to be Level 1 in accordance with the
three-tier fair value hierarchy. The fair market values are based
on period-end statements supplied by the various banks and brokers
that held the majority of the Company’s funds. The fair value
of short-term financial instruments (primarily cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other
current assets and liabilities) approximate their carrying values
because of their short-term nature.
10
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This
Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements regarding our
business, customer prospects, or other factors that may affect
future earnings or financial results that are subject to the safe
harbor created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties which could
cause actual results to vary materially from those expressed in the
forward-looking statements. Investors should read and understand
the risk factors detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (“2016 10-K”) and
in other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
We
operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of
risks, some of which are beyond our control. This list highlights
some of the risks which may affect future operating results. These
are the risks and uncertainties we believe are most important for
you to consider. Additional risks and uncertainties, not presently
known to us, which we currently deem immaterial or which are
similar to those faced by other companies in our industry or
business in general, may also impair our business operations. If
any of the following risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our
business, financial condition and operating results would likely
suffer. These risks include, among others, the
following:
●
changes in the
funding priorities of the U.S. federal government;
●
changes in the way
the U.S. federal government contracts with businesses;
●
terms specific to
U.S. federal government contracts;
●
our failure to keep
pace with a changing technological environment;
●
intense competition
from other companies;
●
inaccuracy in our
estimates of the cost of services and the timeline for completion
of contracts;
●
non-performance by
our subcontractors and suppliers;
●
our dependence on
third-party software and software maintenance
suppliers;
●
our failure to
adequately integrate businesses we may acquire;
●
fluctuations in our
results of operations and the resulting impact on our stock
price;
●
the limited public
market for our common stock;
●
changes in the
economic health of our non U.S. federal government customers;
and
●
our forward-looking
statements and projections may prove to be inaccurate.
In some
cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as
“may,” “will,” “should,”
“could,” “would,” “expect,”
“plans,” “anticipates,”
“believes,” “estimates,”
“projects,” “predicts,”
“intends,” “potential” and similar
expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
statements reflect our current views with respect to future events
and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and
uncertainties. Given these uncertainties, you should not place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We discuss many
of these risks in greater detail under the heading “Risk
Factors” in Item 1A of our 2016 10-K. Also, these
forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions
only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we
assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements after
the date of this report.
Our Business
Founded
in 1979, IAI is in the business of modernizing client information
systems, developing and maintaining information technology systems,
developing electronic forms, and performing consulting services to
government and commercial organizations. We have performed software
conversion projects for over 100 commercial and government
customers, including Computer Sciences Corporation, IBM, Computer
Associates, Sprint, Citibank, U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
U.S. Treasury Department, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S.
Department of Education, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Army, U.S.
Air Force, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation. Today, we primarily apply our
technology, services and experience to legacy software migration
and modernization for commercial companies and government agencies,
and to developing web-based solutions for agencies of the U.S.
federal government.
In the
three months ended March 31, 2017, our prime contracts with U.S.
government agencies generated 61.9% of our revenue, subcontracts
under federal procurements generated 27.2% of our revenue, and
10.9% of our revenue came from commercial contracts. The terms of
these contracts and subcontracts vary from single transactions to
five years. Within this group of prime contracts with U.S.
government agencies, two individual contracts generated 22.3% and
13.0% of our revenue, respectively. One subcontract generated 18.1%
of our revenue.
11
In the
three months ended March 31, 2016, our prime contracts with U.S.
government agencies generated 66.9% of our revenue, subcontracts
under federal procurements generated 17.7% of our revenue, and
15.4% of our revenue came from commercial contracts. The terms of
these contracts and subcontracts varied from single transactions to
five years. Within this group of prime contracts with U.S.
government agencies, two contracts generated 23.7% and 22.4% of our
revenue, respectively. One commercial customer accounted for 10.6%
of our revenue.
We sold
third party software and maintenance contracts under agreements
with two major suppliers. These sales accounted for 31.2% of total
revenue in the first quarter of 2017 and 42.7% of revenue in the
first quarter of 2016.
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2017 versus Three Months Ended March 31,
2016
Revenue
Our
revenues in the first quarter of 2017 were $1,481,648 compared to
$1,468,326 in the corresponding quarter in 2016, an increase of
$13,322, or 0.9%. Professional fees revenue was $1,020,033 in the
first quarter of 2017 versus $841,037 in the corresponding quarter
in 2016, an increase of $178,996, or 21.3%, and software revenue
was $461,615 in the first quarter of 2017 versus $627,289 in the
first quarter of 2016, a decrease of 26.4%. Revenue from
professional fees increased due primarily to one new subcontract
under a federal procurement, though there were several minor
increases and decreases in activity under our other professional
services contracts. The decrease in our software revenue in 2017
versus the same period in 2016 is due to the non-recurring nature
of many of our software sales transactions. Software sales and
associated margins are subject to considerable fluctuation from
period to period, based on the product mix sold and referral fees
earned.
Gross Profit
Gross
profit was $499,845, or 33.7% of revenue in the first quarter of
2017 versus $357,673, or 24.4% of revenue in the first quarter of
2016. For the quarter ended March 31, 2017, $485,287 of the gross
profit was attributable to professional fees at a gross profit
percentage of 47.6%, and $14,558 of the gross profit was
attributable to software sales at a gross profit percentage of
3.2%. In the same quarter in 2016, we reported gross profit for
professional fees of $292,644, or 34.8%, of professional fee
revenue, and gross profit of $65,029, or 10.4% of software sales.
Gross profit from professional fees increased with the increase in
revenue. Gross profit on software sales decreased in terms of
dollars and as a percentage of sales due to a decrease in referral
fees for facilitating third-party sales, for which there were no
direct costs incurred by us. Software product sales and associated
margins are subject to considerable fluctuation from period to
period, based on the product mix sold and referral fees
earned.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general
and administrative expenses, exclusive of sales commissions, were
$418,786, or 28.3% of revenues, in the first quarter of 2017 versus
$516,970, or 35.2% of revenues, in the first quarter of 2016. These
expenses decreased $98,184, or 19.0%, from the first quarter of
2016. The decreases are largely from decreases in overhead and
sales labor, corresponding decreases in fringe benefits for that
labor, and decreases in technical training and
conferences.
Commission expense
was $114,633, or 7.7% of revenues, in the first quarter of 2017
versus $53,403, or 3.6% of revenues, in the first quarter of 2016.
This increase of $61,230, or 114.7%, is due to increases in gross
profits on commissionable professional services contracts, which
drive commission earned at varying rates for each
salesperson.
Net loss
Net
loss for the three months ended March 31, 2017, was $31,616, or
2.1% of revenue, versus net loss of $210,270, or 14.3% of revenue,
for the same period in 2016.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our
cash and cash equivalents balance, when combined with our cash flow
from operations during the first three months of 2017, were
sufficient to provide financing for our operations. Our net cash
used by the combination of our operating and investing activities
in the first three months of 2017 was $132,850. This net cash, when
added to a beginning balance of $1,895,372, yielded cash and cash
equivalents of $1,762,522 as of March 31, 2017. Prepaid expenses
and other current assets decreased $230,420 due to the allocation
over time of prepaid expenses associated with the maintenance
contracts on software sales. Deferred revenue decreased $249,903
due to the recognition of revenue over time from maintenance
contracts on software sales. Commissions payable decreased $36,500
due to payouts of existing commissions payable balances occurring
faster than new commissions earned. We had no non-current
liabilities as of March 31, 2017.
12
We have
a revolving line of credit with a bank providing for demand or
short-term borrowings of up to $1,000,000. The line expires on May
31, 2017. As of March 31, 2017, we were in default of a covenant to
maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $1,800,000. Our bank has
issued a waiver of the default through the expiration of the
current term of the line of credit. At that time the bank will
review our balance sheets and results of operations for 2017. We
anticipate the bank will renew our line of credit with some
adjustment to terms, covenants, or both, but we can provide no
assurance that the bank will indeed renew the line of credit nor
renew it under terms we deem favorable. As of March 31, 2017, no
amounts were outstanding under this line of credit. We did not
borrow against this line of credit in the last twelve
months.
Given
our current cash position and operating plan, we anticipate that we
will be able to meet our cash requirements for at least twelve
months from the date of filing of this Form 10-Q.
We
presently lease our corporate offices on a contractual basis with
certain timeframe commitments and obligations. We believe that our
existing offices will be sufficient to meet our foreseeable
facility requirement. Should we need additional space to
accommodate increased activities, management believes we can secure
such additional space on reasonable terms.
We have
no material commitments for capital expenditures.
We have
no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our
management, under the supervision and with the participation of our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and people
performing similar functions, has evaluated the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange
Act), as of March 31, 2017 (the “Evaluation Date”).
Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date,
our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we
file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and
(ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2017, that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Because
of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no control
system can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and
instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because
of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be
circumvented by the individual acts of a person, by collusion of
two or more people or by management override of the control. The
design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be
no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the
inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be
detected. Notwithstanding these limitations, we believe that our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide
reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.
13
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
“Item
1A. Risk Factors” of our annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2016 includes a discussion of our risk
factors. There have been no material changes from the risk factors
described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2016.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and
Use of Proceeds
None.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item
4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not
applicable.
Item
5. Other Information
None.
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
32.1
|
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
32.2
|
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
14
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
Information
Analysis Incorporated
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 11,
2017
|
By:
|
/s/ Sandor
Rosenberg
|
|
|
|
Sandor
Rosenberg, Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer, and
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 11, 2017
|
By:
|
/s/
Richard S. DeRose
|
|
|
|
Richard
S. DeRose, Executive Vice President,
Treasurer, and Chief
|
|
|
|
|
|
15