WESTERN CAPITAL RESOURCES, INC. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒ ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 |
or
☐ TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______________________ to ___________________ |
Commission File Number 000-52015
WESTERN CAPITAL RESOURCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 47-0848102 |
(State of incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
11550 “I” Street, Suite 150 Omaha, Nebraska |
68137 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (402) 551-8888
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: | ||
Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on which Registered | |
None | N/A |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, no par value per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ☐ | Accelerated filer ☐ | Non-accelerated filer ☐ | Smaller reporting company ☒ | Emerging Growth Company ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by persons other than officers, directors and more than 5% shareholders of the registrant as of June 30, 2017 was approximately $14,601,000 based on the closing sales price of $4.90 per share as reported on the OTCQB. As of March 29, 2018, there were 9,390,997 shares of our common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED IN PART BY REFERENCE
None.
Western Capital Resources, Inc.
Form 10-K
Table of Contents
OVERVIEW
Western Capital Resources, Inc. (“WCR” or “Western Capital”), a Delaware corporation originally incorporated in Minnesota in 2001 and reincorporated in Delaware in 2016, is a holding company having a controlling interest in subsidiaries operating in the following industries and operating segments:
Our “Cellular Retail” segment is comprised of an authorized Cricket Wireless dealer and involves the retail sale of cellular phones and accessories to consumers through our wholly owned subsidiary PQH Wireless, Inc. and its subsidiaries, one of which is 70% owned. Our “Direct to Consumer” segment consists of a wholly owned online and direct marketing distribution retailer of live plants, seeds, holiday gifts and garden accessories selling its products under Park Seed, Jackson & Perkins and Wayside Gardens brand names and home improvement and restoration products operating as Van Dyke’s Restorers as well as a wholesaler under the Park Wholesale brand. Our “Consumer Finance” segment consists of retail financial services conducted through our wholly owned subsidiaries Wyoming Financial Lenders, Inc. and Express Pawn, Inc. Throughout this report, we collectively refer to WCR and its consolidated subsidiaries as “we,” the “Company,” and “us.”
RECENT EVENTS
Sale of Franchise Business
On October 2, 2017, the Company sold 100% of its stock holdings of AlphaGraphics, Inc. (“AGI”), the sole business comprising the Company’s franchise segment, for approximately $61,500,000 (subject to adjustment) and as more fully explained in Note 19 “Discontinued Operations” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this report. All debt, with the exception of approximately $789,000 of long-term debt incurred in our 2017 acquisition of Cricket stores, as more fully explained in Note 18 “Acquisitions” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this report, of approximately $6,980,000 has been paid off with proceeds from the sale. AGI net income applicable to the Company’s shareholders for the year, including the gain on sale, was $36.29 million. We intend to use the net proceeds, after payment of income taxes and the aforementioned debt reduction, for future acquisition activity.
Cellular Retail Growth
In 2017, we grew our Cellular Retail segment by opening 91 new locations and acquiring 7 others, ending 2017 with 278 locations open. As the industry undergoes changes, we are continually reviewing opportunities to take strategic action. On February 1, 2018, we exchanged stores with another Cricket dealer to concentrate our operations in some markets while exiting others. As a result of this transaction, we reduced our store count by 13. We also sold or transferred several other locations to other dealers in order to concentrate our focus and enhance overall results.
Direct to Consumer Realignment
We are realigning our direct to consumer distribution model from the partial use of an outsourced service provider to a fully integrated in-house fulfillment model. We believe that in addition to enhancing distribution performance, this will allow us to consolidate our customer service center which will enhance the experience of our end customers. We also merged our online and direct marketing distribution retailer Van Dykes Restorers, specializing in home improvement and restoration products, into its sister company J & P Park Acquisitions, Inc., also an online and direct marketing retailer. We believe these realignment strategies will result in decreased operational costs, a higher quality call center, and creation of new jobs qualifying for South Carolina tax credits.
1
Acquisitions
We are actively searching for acquisition opportunities. We are industry agnostic and target leaders in niche industries or geographies as well as opportunistic purchases of businesses that we believe we can improve operationally. We have a particular interest in companies facing succession dilemmas, corporate divestitures and businesses in out-of-favor industries. In addition, we seek to grow our subsidiaries through add-on acquisitions in the e-commerce, cellular retail and consumer finance segments. Our overall strategy continues to focus on building a diversified portfolio of strong cash flow generating businesses. Our financial strength, long-term view and operating expertise allow subsidiary companies to focus on growing and maximizing return on investment. We expect to be patient and move upon what we believe to be the right investment opportunities.
Dividend
In January 2018, our Board of Directors declared an increase of our dividend to $0.05 per share, which was paid in February 2018. Our dividends declared and paid in previous quarters have been at $0.025 per share.
CELLULAR RETAIL SEGMENT
General Description
We operate cellular retail stores as an authorized Cricket dealer, selling cellular phones and accessories, providing ancillary services and accepting service payments from customers. Authorized Cricket dealers are permitted to sell the carrier’s line and generally locate their store operations in areas with a strong potential customer base where the carrier does not maintain a corporate storefront. As an authorized Cricket dealer, we are only permitted to sell the Cricket line of no-contract cellular phones and service at our Cricket retail stores.
We generate revenue in this business through retail sales of cellular phones, receipt of back-end compensation from Cricket, sales of phone accessories (e.g., cases, car chargers and bluetooth speakers), fees charged when a customer changes services (service activations and reactivations, adding lines, phone number changes, etc.), or whenever a customer whom we activated on the Cricket network pays his or her no-contract cellular bill.
A summary table of the number of cellular retail stores we operated during the periods ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 follows:
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Beginning | 198 | 99 | ||||||
Acquired / Launched / Managed | 98 | 108 | ||||||
Closed | (18 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Ending | 278 | 198 |
Market Information and Marketing
Cricket Wireless service offers customers simple, no-contract, predictable and affordable nationwide flat rate wireless plans. Cricket Wireless customers have the added advantage of unlimited minutes, text and data access on the AT&T network.
No-contract cellular products and services were historically targeted primarily only to market segments that were underserved by traditional communications companies requiring credit approval, a contractual commitment from the subscriber for a period of at least one year, and often included overage charges for minute and data usage in excess of a specified limit. We believe that a large portion of the U.S. cellular market consists of customers who are price-sensitive and prefer not to enter into these fixed-term contracts. We believe that the Cricket Wireless cellular retail product and service offerings we offer appeal strongly not only to the underserved markets but to the greater U.S. cellular market as well and believe we are positioned to benefit as Cricket Wireless increases its subscribers.
Market Strategy
We believe that our business model is scalable and we can apply our operational protocols and administrative office functions to continue expanding our cellular retail business. We will continue to evaluate strategic and opportunistic acquisitions of existing Cricket dealerships and will actively close, dispose or consolidate locations that do not meet our operating criteria in order to streamline operations.
2
Products and Services
Our authorized Cricket retail stores offer the following products and services:
● | Cricket Wireless service plans, each designed to attract customers by offering simple, predictable and affordable talk, text and high-speed data services that are a competitive alternative to traditional wireless and wireline services (e.g., flat-rate and unlimited talk/text plans, without fixed-term contracts, early termination fees or credit checks); |
● | Cricket Wireless plan upgrades, such as Cricket International unlimited text messages (SMS) from the U.S. to 38 countries, plus calls and messages from the U.S. to Mexico and Canada and roaming calls and texts (SMS only) to local numbers in Mexico and Canada and back to the U.S (included in all plans from $50 per month), Deezer (an independent music service on a no-contract basis), Cricket Protect and mobile hotspots; and |
● | Cricket handsets and accessories. |
When purchasing a phone, our customers have options among the latest in Apple, Android-based and Windows OS-based smartphones. Because there is no contract for the monthly service, customer phone purchases are paid in full at the time of purchase.
Seasonality
Our Cellular Retail segment operations are influenced by seasonal effects related to traditional retail selling periods and other factors affecting our target customer base. In particular, we generally expect sales activity to be highest in the first and fourth quarters. Nevertheless, our revenues can be strongly affected by the launch of new markets, new or improved products, promotional activity, the timing of federal tax-refunds and the actions of our competitors, any of which have the ability to offset or exacerbate the seasonality we normally experience.
Competition
There is substantial and ever increasing competition in the wireless phone industry where customers can choose between many other postpaid and no-contract resellers, including AT&T, Verizon, Sprint/Boost Mobile, T-Mobile/Metro PCS and a larger number of regional providers. We compete for customers based principally on Cricket’s service/device offerings, price, call quality and coverage area.
Competition for the no-contract customers, the sub-industry in which we largely operate, is primarily among MetroPCS, Virgin Mobile and Boost Mobile, but also includes the traditional postpaid carriers that have introduced no-contract products. There is also competition with other no-contract phone service providers such as Straight Talk by Wal-Mart or Wal-Mart’s Family Mobile powered by T-Mobile, an increase of national retailers offering similar or identical products and services that we provide, such as Cricket phones sold at Game Stop and Wal-Mart, and an increase in mobile virtual network operator (“MVNO”) offerings.
Our Cricket store business also competes with other current or potential authorized Cricket Wireless dealers. The authorization to sell Cricket products and services is granted by Cricket Wireless, LLC, a wholly owned entity of Leap Wireless International, Inc. On March 13, 2014, Leap Wireless International was acquired by AT&T. Our ability to compete with other sellers of Cricket products and services will depend on the success with which we operate our stores.
DIRECT TO CONSUMER SEGMENT
General Description
Our direct to consumer segment is a direct marketer of roses, plants, seeds, holiday gifts and home restoration products. The business is composed of: 1) a multi-channel retailer of garden and living gift products; 2) a wholesale seed business; and 3) a multi-channel retailer of home hardware and restoration products. Our garden products brands are highly recognizable in the rose and garden space as both the Jackson & Perkins and Park Seed brands were founded more than 145 years ago.
3
Products and Services
Our direct to consumer segment sells product through catalogs and online under the following brands:
● | Jackson & Perkins, 147 years of history and is the most recognized brand of premium garden roses. Jackson and Perkins is one of the largest direct to consumer retailers of bare root roses in the United States, selling over 150 active varieties of bare root roses, of which 87 varieties are patented by Jackson and Perkins. In addition to bare root roses, we sell perennials, flower bulbs, outdoor living products as well as living holiday gifts plants. Holiday gifts include fresh evergreen wreathes, live decorative Christmas trees and holiday amaryllis; |
● | Park Seed, 150 years in the business and one of America’s oldest and largest direct to consumer seed retailers. As a leader within the direct to consumer seed business, Park Seed sells over 2,500 premium vegetable and flower seed varieties, as well as various gardening supplies. The wholesale seed business sells seeds, plants and other horticultural products in larger quantities to small-medium sized growers, nurseries and garden centers. Plants and seeds sales are concentrated during the spring months; |
● | Wayside Gardens, sells unique, hard to find high-end flowers, plants and gardening supplies to the master gardener. The Wayside Gardens customer is extremely selective, very knowledgeable, and seeks high quality plants. Approximately 60% of sales occur in the three months from March to May, during the spring planting season; and |
● | Van Dyke’s, an online and catalog retailer with a vast assortment of vintage home restoration wood products, hardware and antique furniture, many of which are hard to find. Van Dyke’s focus is on hardware, decorative wood, home accents, knobs and pulls and kitchen, bath and other décor. |
Seasonality
Demand for live goods and holiday products is cyclical in nature, sensitive to seasonal growing patterns, general weather conditions, holiday sales patterns and competitive influences. As such, the direct to consumer segment’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could fluctuate significantly from period to period. The majority of segment revenue is derived in three selling periods, spring, fall, and the December holiday season, while the summer season accounts for a small portion of sales.
Market Strategy
As a direct to consumer retailer, we focus our marketing spending on mail order catalogs, internet advertising, and traditional advertising mediums (i.e., public relations, magazines, social media, etc.). We are focused on niche markets and direct our advertising to repeat and new customers through internet marketing strategies.
Competition
In the retail garden business, within the bare root rose category, we compete against brick and mortar garden centers and nurseries (approximately 10,000 across the United States), as well as other online and mail-order retailers, including David Austin Roses and Regan Nursery. Across other plant categories, we compete against Gardens Alive and their portfolio of brands, and other competitors. Our biggest competitive advantages are our recognizable Jackson & Perkins brand name proprietary patented rose varieties and exclusive garden seed products. The most direct competitor for Wayside Gardens is White Flower Farms, which also focuses on high-end, premium plants.
Within the holiday gift segment, we compete against larger competitors including Harry and David and 1-800 Flowers, among others. Within the seed business, our primary competitor is Burpee which, in addition to having an online presence, supplies lower-end seed products to mass market retailers, including Wal-Mart.
Our Van Dyke’s Restorers brand competes primarily with other online retailers since brick and mortar stores cannot afford to carry Van Dyke’s breadth of SKUs. Our competitors are Signature Hardware, House of Antique Hardware, and Rejuvenation Hardware (part of Williams Sonoma). The above-mentioned competitors compete primarily in the hardware, lighting and kitchen and bath categories. The decorative wood portion of the Van Dyke’s business is in a very fragmented industry niche and there are no big decorative wood competitors. Van Dyke’s competes primarily through the breadth of its product variety as well as through its established brand name and customer list.
4
CONSUMER FINANCE SEGMENT
General Description
The majority of short-term consumer loans we provide are commonly referred to as “payday loans” or “cash advance” loans. Such loans are referred to as “payday loans” because they are typically made to borrowers who have no available cash and promise to repay the loan out of their next paycheck. We also provide short-term installment and pawn loans as part of this operating segment.
We provide short-term consumer loans in amounts that typically range from $100 to $500 with the average loan amount, including fee, being approximately $421. Cash advance loans provide customers with cash in exchange for a promissory note with a maturity of generally two to four weeks and the customer’s post-dated personal check for the aggregate amount of the cash advance, plus a fee. The fee varies from state to state based on applicable regulations, and generally ranges from $15 to $22 for each whole or partial increment of $100 borrowed. To repay the cash advance loan, a customer may pay with cash, in which case their personal check is returned to them, or allow the check to be presented to the bank for collection. Approximately 90% and 89% of our lending revenue in the Consumer Finance segment was derived from payday lending in 2017 and 2016, respectively. Payday lending revenue made up approximately 74% of our total revenue in the Consumer Finance segment in 2017 and 2016.
We offer short-term “installment” loans in Colorado and Wisconsin. Approximately 6% and 7% of our lending revenue in the Consumer Finance segment was derived from installment lending in 2017 and 2016. We provide our installment loan customers with cash in exchange for a promissory note with a maturity of generally six months. The fee and interest rate on installment loans vary based on applicable regulations. Like cash advance or payday loans, installment loans are unsecured.
We operate three pawn stores in our Consumer Finance segment. Our pawn stores provide collateralized non-recourse loans, commonly known as “pawn loans” with maturities of one to four months. Allowable service charges vary by state and loan size. The loan amount varies depending on our valuation of each item pawned. We generally lend from 30% to 55% of our estimate of the collateral’s resale value. Customers have the option to redeem the pawned merchandise during the term or at maturity, or else forfeit the merchandise to us on maturity. At our pawn stores we sell merchandise that was acquired through either customer forfeiture of pawn collateral, second-hand merchandise purchased from customers or consigned to us, or new merchandise purchased from vendors. Pawn store revenues made up approximately 17% and 16% of our total revenue in the Consumer Finance segment in 2017 and 2016, respectively.
All of our Consumer Finance lending activities and other services are subject to state regulations (which vary from state to state), federal regulations and local regulations, where applicable.
As part of each payday and installment loan transaction, we enter into a standardized written promissory note with the borrowing customer and obtain proof of income and identity, a personal post-dated check for the principal loan amount plus a specified fee if a payday loan, and other documentation. Our standardized contracts vary based on state laws, but all of our contracts plainly state in simple terms the annual percentage rate (assuming the fees we charge are computed as interest) in compliance with Regulation Z, the borrower’s right to rescind the transaction, a dispute-resolution clause, a notice of financial privacy rights, an affirmative representation about whether the borrower is a member of the U.S. military, and the consequences of defaulting on the loan. We retain copies of our written contracts and provide a signed copy to our customers.
In general, our lending process and standards are extraordinarily different from those used by banks. To our knowledge, banks typically order and carefully review credit reports on all loans, engage in extensive underwriting analysis, and will typically make independent verification of earnings history through phone calls, reviews of tax returns and other processes. As a result, we generally experience a higher default rate on our personal loans than banks do on their personal loans (see caption below, “Risks Associated with Our Loans—Default and Collection”). At December 31, 2017, we had an aggregate (of all loan types) of approximately:
● | $4.14 million in current outstanding loan principal, fees and interest due to us; and |
● | $1.00 million of late loans (customers’ repayment checks presented as NSF within the last 180 days or installment loan balances not past the final installment due date with one or more payments delinquent). |
5
A summary table of the number of Consumer Finance locations operated during the periods ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 follows:
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Beginning | 41 | 47 | ||||||
Acquired / Launched | — | — | ||||||
Closed | — | (6 | ) | |||||
Ending | 41 | 41 |
The Fees We Charge
The fee we charge for a payday loan varies from state to state, based on applicable regulations, and generally ranges from $15 to $22 for each whole or partial increment of $100 borrowed. We do not charge interest in connection with our payday loans but do charge interest and fees where allowable on our short-term installment loans made in Colorado and Wisconsin. If, however, we calculate the loan fees we charge as an annual percentage rate of interest (APR), such rate would range from 177% for a 31-day loan transacted in Kansas (on the low end) to approximately 536% for a 14-day loan in Wyoming (on the high end), with the actual average loan amount and average actual loan fees we charge involving an imputed annual percentage rate of approximately 439% and 198% for a 14-day and 31-day loan, respectively. The term of a loan significantly affects the imputed APR of the fees we charge for our loans. For instance, when a $15 fee is charged for a two-week loan of $100, the resulting APR is 391%. When the same fee on $100 is charged for a four-week loan, the resulting APR is 195%. Currently, we do not charge the maximum fee permitted in all of the states where we operate. We do, however, charge a uniform fee for all transactions processed in any particular state that involve the same range of payday loan amounts and the same term.
Of the seven states in which we presently operate, only one state (Wisconsin) does not limit the loan fees we may charge or the term (i.e., the length) of the loans we may offer our customers
In Wisconsin and Colorado, we generally offer short-term installment loans in amounts from $300 to $750 payable in six equal monthly payments. Colorado loan terms include a 45% annual interest rate, an origination fee of 20% on loan amounts up to $300 and 7.5% on loan amounts thereafter, and a monthly maintenance fee. Wisconsin installment loans are payable over four to six months at an annual percentage rate of approximately 480%.
We also offer pawn loans in Nebraska and Iowa. Allowable service charges for pawn loans vary by state and loan size. Our pawn loans earn 24% per month and our average pawn loan amount typically ranges between $10 and $250, although may range as high as $2,000. The loan amount varies depending on our estimated value of each item pawned.
Many states have laws limiting the amount of fees that may be charged in connection with any lending transaction (including payday and pawn lending transactions) when calculated as an APR, and some states expressly prohibit payday lending. These limitations, combined with other limitations and restrictions, effectively prohibit us from utilizing our present business model for cash advance or “payday” lending in those jurisdictions. In addition, the federal “2007 Military Authorization Act” prohibits lenders from offering or making payday loans (or similar lending transactions) to members of the U.S. military when the interest or fees exceed a 36% APR. Like the state limitations discussed above, this limitation effectively prohibits us from providing our cash advance or “payday” lending to members of the U.S. military. As a result of these restrictions, we do not conduct business with U.S. military personnel.
The above-described payday fees are the only fees we assess and collect from our customers for payday loans. Nevertheless, we also charge a flat fee that ranges from $15 to $30 (depending on the state) for returned checks in the event that a post-dated check we attempt to cash as repayment for our loan is returned.
Extensions or “Rollovers” of Payday Loans
Most states prohibit payday lenders from extending or refinancing a payday loan. Nevertheless, one state in which we presently provide payday loans (North Dakota) permits a loan to be extended or “rolled over” once.
6
When a customer “rolls over” or extends the term of an outstanding loan, when permitted by state law, we treat that rollover or extension as a brand new loan and we again charge the above-described loan fee for that transaction. This rollover has no effect on the imputed APR of the loan in those cases where the extended term is equal to the initial term of the loan. For example, a $100 four-week loan that costs $20 to obtain is the APR equivalent of 261%. If a customer extends the term of that loan for an additional four-week period, the customer will have paid $40 total in fees to obtain the $100 eight-week loan—which is again the APR equivalent of 261%. In cases where a customer (1) extends or rolls over a loan for a length of time that is less than the original loan or (2) repays the extended loan prior to the expiration of the fully extended term, the imputed APR will increase. For example, if a customer who obtained an initial $100 four-week loan for $20 in loan fees (the APR equivalent of 261%) later extends the term of that loan for only two additional weeks and pays the additional $20 loan fee, that customer will have borrowed $100 for a six-week period at a total cost of $40—which is the APR equivalent of 347%. We do not charge any interest on the unpaid fee from the initial term of the loan because, as a condition to agreeing to a loan extension, we will only accept cash payment of the fee for extending the loan.
Risks Associated With Our Loans—Default and Collection
Ordinarily, our customers approach us for a loan because they currently have insufficient funds to meet their present obligations, and so rarely if ever do our customers have sufficient funds in their checking accounts to cover the personal post-dated checks they provide us at the time of the loan transaction. The nature of our payday loan transactions presents a number of risks, including the ultimate risk that the loan will not be paid back. In addition, we do not obtain security for our payday loans principally because, even assuming our customers would have potential collateral to offer as security for a payday loan, the small size of each particular lending transaction does not justify the time, effort and expense of identifying the collateral and properly obtaining a security interest in such collateral. As a consequence, all of our payday loans are unsecured. This means that, absent court or other legal action compelling a customer to repay our loans, we rely principally on the willingness and ability of our customers to repay amounts they owe us. In this regard, in many cases the costs of merely attempting to collect the amounts owed to us exceed the amounts we would seek to collect—making it impractical to take formal legal action against a defaulted borrower.
When a customer defaults on a loan, we engage in collection practices that include contacting the customer for repayment and the customer’s bank to determine whether funds are available to satisfy their personal post-dated check. If funds are available, we present the check to the bank for repayment and an official check from the bank is obtained to pay off the item. The costs involved in these initial collection efforts are minimal, involve some employee time and possibly a flat $15-30 bank fee to cover the cost of the cashier’s check. If funds are not available, we generally attempt to collect returned checks for up to 90 days (or up to 180 days in cases where a bank account is still active and the customer has not initiated a stop payment on the postdated check provided), principally through continued attempts to contact the customer. If our attempts remain unsuccessful after 90 (or 180) days, we generally assign the item to a collection agency. Assignment to a collection agency may cost us 30-40% of the amount eventually collected (if any) from the customer. Ordinarily, we do not recoup any costs of collection from our customers.
Historically, we collect approximately 58% of the amount of all returned checks, which results in approximately 2.69% of our total payday loan principal and fee volume being uncollectible. In 2017, we generated approximately 135,000 payday loan transactions.
Industry Information
According to a November 2016 study by the Center for Financial Services Innovation (“2016 Financially Underserved Market Size Study”) consumers spent approximately $3.6 billion on fees for single payment loan products from storefront payday lenders in 2015. This represented a decline over prior years and the trend was expected to continue going forward. According to the Community Financial Services Association of America (CFSA) website, industry analysts estimate that 19 million U.S. households use short-term payday advances and estimate that there are 20,600 payday advance locations across the United States, which extend approximately $38.5 billion in short-term credit to households experiencing cash-flow shortfalls. In addition to being a valuable source of credit for many consumers, the payday loan industry makes significant contributions to the U.S. and state economies employing more than 50,000 Americans who earn $2 billion in wages and generating more than $2.6 billion in federal, state, and local taxes. Industry trends indicate that there will likely be a net decrease in total payday lending stores over the next few years due to store closings resulting from a combination of regulatory or legal changes, regulatory pressures, a slowdown in new store growth, and general economic conditions.
Predatory Lending and Regulatory Concerns
In general, the payday lending industry suffers from the perception and widespread belief that payday lenders are by their nature, predatory lenders, offering loans to low income and poorly educated consumers at costs that are too high to be good for consumers. This perception and belief results in frequent efforts in the U.S. Congress and various state legislatures, often proposed by consumer advocacy groups and lobbyists for traditional financial institutions such as banks, to further regulate and restrict or prohibit payday lending outright. See “Item 1A – Risk Factors” for further information regarding regulatory risks.
7
We do not believe the payday lending is predatory, nor do we believe that our loans are too costly for consumers if they are judiciously obtained. In fact, we believe that bank overdraft fees by themselves are typically far more costly for consumers, and bouncing a check can often involve other negative consequences such as independent fees levied by the parties to whom a bad check is written, negative publicity, etc. In this regard, the FDIC released a November 2008 report called “Study of Bank Overdraft Programs.” The report indicates that the average amount obtained when bank customers overdraw their accounts is $60, and the average overdraft fee charged by the bank is $27. This equates to an APR of 1,173% and 587% for a two-week and four-week $60 bank “loan,” respectively. In sum, we believe that many of the bad perceptions about our industry are fueled primarily by:
● | the effects of our loans on consumers who do not judiciously obtain payday loans; |
● | a lack of genuine understanding about the choices faced by low and middle-income people facing a critical cash shortage; and |
● | anti-payday lending lobbying campaigns often funded by traditional financial institutions, such as banks and credit unions, that would economically benefit from the elimination of payday lending. |
Seasonality
Our Consumer Finance segment results are subject to seasonality, with the first and fourth quarters typically being our strongest periods as a result of broader economic factors, such as holiday spending habits at the end of each year and income tax refunds during the first quarter.
Competition
Like most other payday lenders, we believe that the primary competitive factors in our business are location and customer service. We face intense competition in an industry with relatively low barriers to entry, and we believe that the payday lending markets are becoming more competitive as the industry matures and consolidates. We compete with other payday lending and check cashing stores, and with financial service entities and retail businesses that offer payday loans or similar financial services. For example, we consider credit card companies that offer payday features, credit unions, banks that offer small loans, and creditors and loan services that can extend payment terms on outstanding loans to be our competitors. In addition, we compete in part with services offered by traditional financial institutions, most particularly with respect to the “overdraft protection” services those institutions may offer and the charges they levy for checks written with insufficient funds.
Additional areas of competition have arisen. Businesses offer loans over the Internet as well as “loans by phone,” and these services compete with the services we offer. There also has been increasing penetration of electronic banking and related services into the check cashing and money transfer industry, including direct deposit of payroll checks, payroll or debit cards, stored-value cards, prepaid credit and debit cards, and electronic transfer of government benefits.
We also believe that customer service is critical to developing loyalty. In our industry, we believe that quality customer service means:
● | assisting with the loan application process and helping our customers understand the loan terms; |
● | treating customers respectfully; and |
● | processing transactions with accuracy, efficiency and speed. |
Our competitors for pawn store merchandise sales include numerous retail and wholesale stores, including jewelry stores, discount retail stores, consumer electronics stores, other pawn stores, other resale stores, electronic commerce retailers and auction sites.
The pawn industry in the United States is large and highly fragmented. The industry consists of approximately 13,000 pawn stores owned primarily by independent operators who own one to three locations. We consider the industry relatively mature. The three largest pawn store operators account for approximately 10% of the total estimated pawn stores in the United States.
8
Effect of General Economic Conditions on our Consumer Finance Segment
Our business has experienced fluctuating changes in our provision for loan losses in recent years. For example, our provision for loan losses as a percentage of payday, installment and pawn loan revenue was 12.3% for 2017 and 16.3% in 2016. We are uncertain how the current economic conditions will affect demand for our services or our loan losses for 2018.
Credit and financing available to us and our industry has been negatively impacted by recent federal and state legislation and regulation, including the overall negative perception associated with payday lending. For example, we are aware of federal and state regulatory pressures being exerted on our banking relationships due to the negative perception about payday lending. For more information, see “Regulation - Regulation of Consumer Financing Activities” below.
REGULATION
We are subject to regulation by federal, state and local governments that affect the products and services we provide. Generally, these regulations are designed to protect consumers who use our services and are not designed to protect our shareholders.
Regulation of Consumer Financing Activities
In those states where we currently operate consumer finance activities, we are licensed as a payday lender or pawn broker where required and are subject to various state regulations regarding the terms and conditions of our payday, installment and pawn loans and our lending policies, procedures and operations. In some states, payday lending is referred to as “deferred presentment,” “cash advance loans,” “deferred deposit loans” or “consumer installment loans.” State regulations normally limit the amount that we may lend to any single consumer and may limit the number of loans that we may make to any consumer at one time or in the course of a single year. State regulations also limit the amount of fees that we may assess in connection with any loan transaction and may limit a customer’s ability to extend or “rollover” a loan with us. Often, state regulations also specify minimum and maximum maturity dates for payday loans and, in some cases, specify mandatory cooling-off periods between transactions.
Our payday lending practices must also comply with the disclosure requirements of the Federal Truth-In-Lending Act and Regulation Z under that Act. Our collection activities for delinquent loans are generally subject to consumer protection laws regulating debt-collection practices. Finally, our payday lending business subjects us to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
During the last few years, legislation has been introduced and passed in the U.S. Congress and in certain state legislatures proposing or effecting various restrictions or an outright prohibition on payday lending. Currently, state laws in Arizona, Montana, Oregon, South Dakota and Georgia have effectively eliminated the ability to conduct payday lending in those states. In 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which consolidated most federal regulation of financial services offered to consumers, and replaced the Office of Thrift Supervision’s seat on the FDIC Board. Almost all credit providers, including mortgage lenders, providers of payday loans, other nonbank financial companies, and banks and credit unions with assets over $10 billion, are subject to regulations and oversight by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). While the CFPB does not have authority to make rules limiting interest rates or fees charged, the scope and extent of its authority is broad enough to impose limits on rollovers and extensions of payday loans, as well as compliance with federal rules and regulations.
After several years of research, debate, and public hearings, in October 2017 the CFPB issued new rules for payday lending. The proposed rules, scheduled to go into effect in August 2019, would impose significant restrictions on the industry, and it is expected that a large number of lenders would be forced to close their stores. The CFPB’s studies projected a reduction in the number of lenders by 50%, while industry studies forecast a much higher attrition rate. Included in the new rules are requirements for vetting borrowers (i.e., obtaining a credit report and performing basic underwriting procedures), limits on the number of loans a consumer could obtain in a 12-month period, limiting to two the number of times a consumer’s check may be presented to the consumer’s bank for payment, and provisions requiring paydowns by the consumer on successive loans. However, in January 2018, the CFPB issued a statement that it intends to “reconsider” the regulation. At this time it is uncertain whether the rule will be implemented as announced, rewritten with more favorable terms for the industry, or thrown out altogether. If the rule is implemented as written, it could have a significant and negative impact on business conducted within our Consumer Finance segment.
9
In addition, our Consumer Finance segment activities are subject to the following federal consumer laws and regulations:
● | Unfair, Deceptive or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP) |
● | Fair Debt Collections Practice Act (FDCPA) |
● | Consumer Compliant Management |
● | Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) (Reg. E) |
● | Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) |
● | Service Members Civil Relief Act |
For more information, see “PAYDAY LENDING BUSINESS—Predatory Lending and Regulatory Concerns” above.
Financial Reporting Regulation
Regulations promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury under the Bank Secrecy Act require us to report all transactions involving currency in an amount greater than $10,000. Generally, every financial institution must report each deposit, withdrawal, exchange of currency or other payment or transfer that involves an amount greater than $10,000. In addition, multiple currency transactions must be treated as a single transaction if we have knowledge that the transactions are by or on behalf of any one person and result, in a single business day, in the transfer of cash in or out totaling more than $10,000. In addition, the regulations require us to maintain information concerning sales of monetary instruments for cash in amounts from $3,000 to $10,000. The Bank Secrecy Act requires us, under certain circumstances, to file a suspicious activity report.
The Money Laundering Suppression Act of 1994 requires us, as a money service business, to register with the United States Department of the Treasury. Money services businesses include check cashers and sellers of money orders. Money services businesses must renew their registrations every two years, maintain a list of their agents, update the agent list annually, and make the agent list available for examination.
Finally, we have established various procedures designed to comply, and we continue to monitor and evaluate our business methods and procedures to ensure compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act.
Privacy Regulation
We are subject to a variety of federal and state laws and regulations restricting the use and seeking to protect the confidentiality of customer identity and other personal nonpublic customer information. We have identified our systems that capture and maintain nonpublic personal information, as that term is understood under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and associated regulations. We disclose our public information policies to our customers as required by that law. We also have systems in place intended to safeguard this information as required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which specifically governs certain aspects of our payday lending business.
Technology and Information
We maintain an integrated system of retail points of sale and management software applications and platforms for processing the various types of financial transactions we offer. These systems provide us with customer service, internal control mechanisms, record-keeping and reporting information. These systems are designed to provide summary, detailed and exception information to various levels of management.
Security
We believe the principal security risks to our Consumer Finance and Cellular Retail segments are robbery and employee theft. We have established extensive security and management information systems to address both areas of potential loss. To protect against robbery, most payday lending store employees work behind bullet-resistant glass, and the back office, safe and computer areas are locked and closed to customers. Security measures utilized in our retail locations include mechanical safes, electronic alarm systems monitored by third parties or remote controlled systems, control over entry to customer service representative, motion detection devices, locked cases, and, at times, the use of professional security services. Consumer Finance segment employees also use cellular phones to ensure safety and security whenever they are outside secured areas.
10
We implemented critical safeguarding controls, including daily cash and deposit monitoring, unannounced audits of cash and inventory items, and requiring immediate responses from our staff when irregularities in cash balances are discovered. We primarily self-insure for employee theft and dishonesty at the store level.
We regularly receive and store information about our customers, vendors and other third parties. We have programs in place to detect, contain, and respond to data security incidents. However, because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and may be difficult to detect for long periods of time, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventive measures. In addition, hardware, software, or applications we develop or procure from third parties or through open source solutions may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise information security. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities, or those of third parties with whom we do business, through fraud, trickery, or other forms of deceiving our team members, contractors, and vendors.
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 2017, we had approximately 1,100 employees. We believe our relationship with our employees is good, and we have not suffered any work stoppages or labor disputes. We do not have any employees that operate under collective-bargaining agreements.
CORPORATE INFORMATION
Our principal offices are located at 11550 “I” Street, Suite 150, Omaha, Nebraska 68137, and our telephone number at that office is (402) 551-8888.
Our fiscal year ends December 31. Neither we nor any of our predecessors have been in bankruptcy, receivership or any similar proceeding.
You should consider the following risk factors, in addition to the other information presented or incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in evaluating our business and your investment in us.
Investment Risks
Acquisitions and strategic investments may fail to meet our expectations, and any such failure could have a negative impact on our results of operation or financial condition, and could ultimately result in dilution to our shareholders.
Our long-term growth strategy includes acquisitions. We may not successfully execute this strategy. An acquisition strategy includes numerous risks, including, among others, the risk that our financial projections relating to our acquisitions may turn out to be incorrect and our investment may fail to positively impact our results and growth as anticipated (and may in fact negatively impact our results), the risk of unexpected or unidentified issues not discovered in the due diligence process which could harm our financial condition, and the need for substantial additional capital which may result in dilution to our shareholders.
Acquisitions and strategic investments made wholly or partly on the basis of our issuance of securities to the target companies, or acquisitions made with cash that is obtained from outside investors or lenders, will result in dilution to our shareholders.
The structuring of future acquisitions, whether through share exchanges, merger acquisitions or otherwise, may result in dilution to existing shareholders. In addition, cash-based transactions may not be financed from corporate cash flows and reserves, and may themselves be financed through borrowing arrangements or the sale of equity or equity-linked securities, the latter of which would be dilutive to our shareholders.
Acquisitions and strategic investments may be disruptive to our business.
The time and expense associated with finding suitable acquisitions or with integrating acquired entities and operations with our Company can be disruptive to our ongoing business and divert our management’s attention. In addition, the financing of acquisitions may impact our ability to obtain or renew financing for existing operations, or subject us to covenants restricting certain activities. Any of these outcomes could have a short- or long-term adverse effect on our results of operation and our ability to further execute our acquisition strategy.
11
Unpredictability in financing and other markets could impair our ability to grow our business through acquisitions
We anticipate that opportunities to acquire businesses will materially depend on the availability of financing alternatives with acceptable terms as well as acceptable market valuations of prospective acquisitions. As a result, poor credit and other market conditions, mergers and acquisitions market valuations, any uncertainty in the financing markets, or the adverse regulatory pressures of being involved in the payday lending business in particular, could materially limit our ability to grow through acquisitions since such conditions and uncertainty make obtaining financing and finding attractive opportunities more difficult and more expensive.
Our controlling shareholder possesses controlling voting power with respect to our common stock, which will limit other shareholders’ influence on corporate matters.
Our controlling shareholders, WCR, LLC and BC Alpha Holdings I, LLC, which are under common control (see Item 12), had beneficial ownership of approximately 59.61% of our common stock as of December 31, 2017. As a result, the controlling shareholders have the ability to outright control our affairs through the election and removal of our entire Board of Directors and all other matters requiring shareholder approval, including a future merger or consolidation of the Company, or a sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentrated control limits the Company’s public float and could discourage others from initiating any such potential merger, consolidation or sale or other change-of-control transaction that may otherwise be beneficial to our shareholders. Furthermore, this concentrated control will limit the practical effect of your participation in Company matters, through shareholder votes and otherwise.
Our certificate of incorporation grants our Board of Directors the power to issue additional shares of common and preferred stock and to designate other classes of preferred stock, all without shareholder approval.
Our authorized capital consists of 12.5 million shares of capital stock. Pursuant to authority granted by our certificate of incorporation, our Board of Directors, without any action by our shareholders, may designate and issue shares in such classes or series (including other classes or series of preferred stock) as it deems appropriate and establish the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares, including dividends, liquidation and voting rights, provided they are consistent with Delaware law. The rights of holders of other classes or series of stock that may be issued could be superior to the rights of holders of our common shares. The designation and issuance of shares of capital stock having preferential rights could adversely affect other rights appurtenant to shares of our common stock. Furthermore, any issuances of additional stock (common or preferred) will dilute the percentage of ownership interest of then-current holders of our capital stock and may dilute our book value per share.
Our common stock trades only in an illiquid trading market.
Trading of our common stock is conducted on the OTCQB, a tier of the OTC Markets (symbol: WCRS). This has an adverse effect on the liquidity of our common stock, not only in terms of the number of shares that can be bought and sold at a given price, but also through delays in the timing of transactions and reduction in security analysts’ and the media’s coverage of us and our common stock. This may result in lower prices for our common stock than might otherwise be obtained and could also result in a larger spread between the bid and asked prices for our common stock.
There is not now and there may not ever be an active market for shares of our common stock.
In general, there has been minimal trading volume in our common stock. During 2017, the average daily trading volume (based on trade volume as reported by OTC Markets) was approximately 699 shares. The small trading volume will likely make it difficult for our shareholders to sell their shares as and when they choose. Furthermore, small trading volumes are generally understood to depress market prices. As a result, you may not always be able to resell shares of our common stock publicly at the time and prices that you feel are fair or appropriate.
A default under our borrowing arrangements could require us to seek financing on a short-term basis that may be disadvantageous to us.
Our borrowing arrangements provide for a series of financial covenants and reporting requirements. If we are unable to comply with the terms or the financial covenants of those borrowing arrangements, we may need to seek additional financing. We may not be able to obtain financing on a short-term basis. Furthermore, even if we are able to obtain needed short-term financing, we may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable or acceptable to us.
12
Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls could limit our ability to detect and prevent fraud and thereby adversely affect our business and stock price.
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports. Nevertheless, all internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. As we continue executing on our acquisition strategy, our fraud risks will change and likely increase as the acquired entity may be unfamiliar or uncooperative with proper internal controls and procedures. Our inability to maintain an effective control environment may cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our stock price.
Our reliance on information management and transaction systems to operate our business exposes us to potential security breaches of our sensitive information from cyber incidents and hacking.
Effective information security internal controls are necessary for us to protect our sensitive information from illegal activities and unauthorized disclosure. Despite our efforts to maintain the highest level of security around our information systems, the sophistication of hackers continues to increase. Our inability to maintain effective controls or utilization of information technology providers that also maintain effective controls may increase our vulnerability to cyber-attacks. Breaches of our information management systems could adversely affect our business reputation. We could also be subject to lawsuits or fines relating to the unauthorized disclosure of information. Any of these outcomes could negatively affect our results of operations and the price of our common stock.
Any disruption in the availability of our information systems could adversely affect our operations.
We rely upon our information systems to manage and operate our business. Our security measures could fail to prevent a disruption in the availability of our information systems, our back-up systems could fail to operate properly, or we may experience denial of service attacks or corruption of our data. Any disruption in the availability of our information systems could adversely affect our results of operations by impairing our ability to efficiently effect transactions.
A significant portion of our assets consists of goodwill and other intangible assets.
As of December 31, 2017, 10.3% of our assets consisted of goodwill and other intangible assets. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the carrying value of goodwill is subject to periodic review and testing to determine if it is impaired. The value of our assets will depend on market conditions, regulatory environment, the availability of buyers and similar factors. While the value of these assets is based on management projections and assumptions and is determined by using the discounted cash flow method for purposes of our impairment testing, those values may differ from what could ultimately be realized by us in a sales transaction or otherwise and that difference, while not affecting cash flow, could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and financial position.
Industry Risks
The payday loan industry is highly regulated under federal, state and local laws and regulations. Changes in federal, state or local laws and regulations governing lending practices, or changes in the interpretation of such laws and regulations, could negatively affect our business.
Our Consumer Finance segment activities are highly regulated under numerous federal, state and local laws, regulations and rules, which are subject to change. New laws, regulations or rules could be enacted or issued, interpretations of existing laws, regulations or rules may change and enforcement action by regulatory agencies may intensify.
Although states provide the primary regulatory framework under which we offer payday loans, certain federal laws also affect our business. For example, because payday loans are viewed as extensions of credit, we must comply with the federal Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z under that Act. Additionally, we are subject to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and certain other federal laws.
From a federal standpoint, anti-payday loan legislation has occasionally been introduced in the U.S. Congress. Over the past several years, consumer advocacy groups and certain media reports have advocated governmental and regulatory action to prohibit or severely restrict sub-prime lending activities such as those we conduct. As outlined under “BUSINESS – REGULATION – Regulation of Consumer Financing Activities,” the CFPB released their final rule in October 2017 but announced in January 2018 that it is reconsidering the rule. If implemented in substantially its present form, the rule may put in question the viability of the entire industry and result in mass store closures.
13
In the states, there are nearly always bills pending to alter the current laws governing payday lending. Any of these bills, or future proposed legislation or regulations prohibiting payday loans or making them less profitable, could be passed in any state at any time, or existing laws permitting payday lending could expire. From time to time legislation banning payday loans has been introduced in Nebraska but has not been passed into law. Since we derive a significant percentage of our payday revenues in Nebraska, the passage of any such legislation in Nebraska would have a highly material and negative effect on our business.
Statutes authorizing payday loans typically provide state agencies that regulate banks and financial institutions with significant regulatory powers to administer and enforce the laws relating to payday lending. Under statutory authority, state regulators have broad discretionary power and may impose new licensing requirements, interpret or enforce existing regulatory requirements in different ways or issue new administrative rules, even if not contained in state statutes, that affect the way we do business and may force us to terminate or modify our operations in those jurisdictions. They may also impose rules that are generally adverse to our industry. Finally, in many states, the attorney general has scrutinized or continues to scrutinize the payday loan statutes and the interpretations of those statutes.
In sum, the passage of federal or state laws and regulations that govern or otherwise affect lending, or changes in interpretations of them, could, at any point, result in our curtailment or cessation of operations in certain or all jurisdictions or locations essentially prohibiting us from conducting its lending business in its current form. Any such legal or regulatory change would certainly have a material and adverse effect on us, our operating results, financial condition and prospects, and perhaps even our viability. Furthermore, any failure to comply with any applicable federal, state or local laws or regulations could result in fines, litigation, closure of one or more store locations and negative publicity.
Adverse changes in laws or regulations relating to pawn lending services could negatively impact our financial results and/or limit our ability to expand into new markets.
Our products and services are subject to extensive regulation and supervision under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations. We face the risk that restrictions or limitations on pawn loan amounts, pawn loan yields and customer acceptance of pawn loan products resulting from the enactment, change or interpretation of laws and regulations could have a negative effect on our business activities. In particular, short-term consumer loans have come under increased scrutiny and increasingly restrictive regulation in recent years. Adoption of such federal, state or local regulation or legislation could restrict, or even eliminate, our ability to conduct our pawn lending operations at a profit level we consider reasonable at some or all of our stores, and could prevent us from expanding into new markets.
Litigation and regulatory actions directed toward the consumer finance industry or our Company could adversely affect our operating results, particularly in certain key states.
During the last few years, the consumer finance industry has been subject to regulatory proceedings, class action lawsuits and other litigation regarding the offering of payday loans, and we could suffer losses resulting from interpretations of state laws in those lawsuits or regulatory proceedings, even if we are not a party to those proceedings. The losses we could suffer could be directly incurred through our involvement in litigation or regulatory proceedings, or could be indirectly incurred through negative publicity regarding the industry in general that is generated by litigation on regulatory proceedings involving third parties.
In addition, regulatory actions or enforcement efforts taken with respect to money services businesses could negatively affect our ability to operate our consumer finance segment in our current form. For example, federal bank regulators are imposing significant costs and regulatory pressure on banks that do business with money services businesses, even though our business is conducted in a manner compliant with applicable law. As a result, fewer and fewer banks are willing to accept or even retain customers in the money services business industry. We may be forced to change long-standing banking relationships and change the way we operate our consumer finance operations, incurring additional capital expenditures and paying higher banking fees.
14
Public perception of payday lending as being predatory or abusive could adversely affect our business.
In recent years, consumer advocacy groups and media reports have advocated governmental action to prohibit or severely restrict payday loans. The consumer groups and media reports typically focus on the cost to a consumer for this type of loan, which is higher than the interest typically charged by credit card issuers. The consumer groups and media reports typically characterize these transactions as predatory or abusive toward consumers. If this negative characterization of our business becomes widely accepted by consumers, demand for our payday loans could significantly decrease, which could adversely affect our results of operations primarily by decreasing our revenues. Negative perception of our business activities could also result in our industry being subject to more restrictive laws and regulations and greater exposure to litigation.
Competition in the consumer finance industry is intense and could cause us to lose market share and revenues.
We believe that the primary competitive factors in the payday loan industry are store location and customer service. We face intense competition in the payday and pawn lending industry, and we believe that those markets are becoming more competitive as these industries mature and begin to consolidate. The payday loan industry has low barriers to entry, and new competitors, such as Wal-Mart, may easily enter the market. The pawn lending industry has medium level barriers to entry, however, there are several large pawn lending companies with which we directly compete. We also currently compete with services, such as overdraft protection offered by traditional financial institutions, and with other payday loan and check cashing stores and other financial service entities and retail businesses that offer payday loans or other similar financial services, as well as a rapidly growing internet-based payday loan market. Some of our competitors have larger and more established customer bases and substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have. As a result, we could lose market share and our revenues could decline, thereby affecting our earnings and potential for growth.
We face significant cellular retail competition that may reduce our market share and lower our profits.
We face significant competition in our Cellular Retail segment. We compete with the four national wireless service providers (AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless) as well as other smaller carriers such as US Cellular and Metro PCS and with many MVNOs such as Walmart’s Straight Talk and Family Mobile plans. We also compete with government-financed “lifeline assurance” programs that offer free or reduced-cost cellular services to individuals and families receiving many types of public assistance. Our ability to compete effectively will depend on, among other things, the pricing of cellular services and equipment, the quality of our customer service, the reach and quality of our sales and distribution channels and our capital resources. It will also depend on how successfully we anticipate and respond to various factors affecting our industry, including new technologies and business models, changes in consumer preferences, demographic trends and economic conditions.
The cellular retail industry also faces competition from other communications and technology companies seeking to capture customer revenue and brand dominance with respect to the provision of cellular accessories and services. For example, Apple Inc. packages software applications and content with its handsets, and Google Inc. has developed and deployed an operating system and related applications for mobile devices.
Free shipping pressure in the e-commerce industry could decrease our direct to consumer segment’s revenues and profitability.
The abundance of fee shipping offers from Amazon.com and other online retailers is putting pressure on our Direct to Consumer segment shipping revenues, currently representing 14% of Direct to Consumer revenues. If market forces lead to the elimination of this revenue stream, it may be difficult for the Direct to Consumer segment to make up that lost revenue.
General economic conditions affect our loan losses, and accordingly, our results of operations could be adversely affected by a general economic slowdown or other negative economic conditions such as high unemployment.
Provision for loan losses, net of recoveries, is one of our largest operating expenses, constituting approximately 12% of our loan fee revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017, with payday loan losses comprising most of the losses. Any changes in economic factors that adversely affect our customers, such as an economic downturn or high unemployment, could result in higher loan loss experiences than anticipated, which could in turn adversely affect our loan charge-offs and operating results.
A sustained deterioration in the economy could reduce demand for our products and services and result in reduced earnings.
A sudden or sustained deterioration in the economy could result in decreased demand for our seed, live plant, holiday gifts and home restoration products. This could result in decreased revenue and, because a significant portion of our sales in the Direct to Consumer segment are of live goods, inventory losses on live product acquired prior to a seasonal selling period could be significant.
15
In addition, a sudden or sustained deterioration in the economy could cause worsening performance of our pawn loans and in consumer demand for and resale value of pre-owned merchandise that we sell in our stores. This, in turn, could reduce the amount that we could effectively lend on an item of collateral. Such reductions could adversely affect pawn loan balances, pawn loan redemption rates, inventory balances, revenues and gross profit margins.
Company Risks
The concentration of our Consumer Finance revenues in certain states could adversely affect us.
We currently provide payday lending services in seven states. For the year ended December 31, 2017, Consumer Finance revenues from our locations in Nebraska represented approximately 36.8% of our total Consumer Finance segment revenues. For the foreseeable future, we expect that a material portion of our Consumer Finance revenues will continue to be generated in Nebraska. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2017, Consumer Finance revenues from our North Dakota, Iowa and Wyoming stores represented approximately 23%, 16% and 13% of our total Consumer Finance revenues, respectively. Changes to prevailing economic, demographic, competitive, regulatory or any other conditions, including the legislative, regulatory or litigation risks mentioned above, in the markets in which we operate, and in Nebraska in particular, could lead to a reduction in demand for our services and result in a decline in our revenues or an increase in our provision for doubtful accounts, or even an outright legal prohibition on the conduct of our business. In this regard, we are aware of pending legislation in Nebraska that is aimed at eliminating payday lending in that state and permitting short-term loans in the nature of installment loans. Any of these outcomes could in turn result in a material and swift deterioration of our Consumer Finance segment financial condition principally by impairing its revenues and affecting its ability to obtain financing and operating liquidity, its operating results and its business prospects.
If estimates of our loan losses are not adequate to absorb actual losses, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses at levels to cover the estimated incurred losses in the collection of our payday and installment loan portfolios outstanding at the end of each applicable period. At the end of each period, management considers recent collection history to develop expected loss rates, which are used to establish the allowance for loan losses. Our allowance for loan losses was $0.83 million on December 31, 2017. Our allowance for loan losses is an estimate, and if actual loan losses are materially greater than our allowance for losses, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We face substantial risk through reliance on a single wireless retail carrier.
We operate our Cellular Retail segment exclusively as an authorized dealer for Cricket, which means that this segment of our operations is entirely dependent upon continued operations as a Cricket dealer under our dealer agreement with Cricket Wireless, the commitment of Cricket Wireless to advertise and offer competitive product and service offerings in our markets, and the health of our relationship with Cricket Wireless. If Cricket Wireless were to change certain aspects of its dealer arrangements, including items such as pricing, product supply, credit terms and dealer compensation structure (all of which are primarily determined by Cricket Wireless) in a manner that is adverse to us, our margins and results of operations would likely suffer. In addition, if Cricket Wireless were to begin growing its relationship with other operators, or were to embark upon an effort to significantly grow corporate-owned locations, our prospects for growth in this segment would suffer.
Risk of wireless retail operating losses from stores opened in 2016 and 2017 and resulting cash burn.
In 2016 and 2017 we received substantial incentives from Cricket Wireless to support our commitment to open 150 locations which mitigated some of the losses associated with these new stores. We do not anticipate receiving similar incentives in the future and it is unclear if we will be able to reduce the cash burn of these newly opened stores.
Managing our inventory is complex and may include write-downs of excess or obsolete inventory.
Managing our inventory, across our segments, is complicated by a number of factors, including the need to maintain a significant inventory of finished goods to support our cellular retail locations and online orders for our products that we anticipate but may not be received. These issues may cause us to purchase and maintain significant amounts of inventory. If this inventory is not used as expected based on anticipated requirements, it may become excess or obsolete. The existence of excess or obsolete inventory can result in sales price reductions or inventory write-downs, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
16
Outside factors may affect our ability to obtain product and fulfill orders in our direct to consumer segment.
In our Direct to Consumer segment we have an agreement with a third party wholesale grower that is in effect until 2019. Although we have taken steps to diversify to two other vendors, the existing grower that maintains the research crop is owned by a company which operates several direct to consumer entities that compete with us directly. Disruptions, whether caused by the third party wholesaler, weather or other environmental or climate influences could limit the supply of product we rely upon to fulfill orders.
Transition from our former fulfillment provider to in-house could affect our ability to fulfill orders in our home restoration division of our direct to consumer segment.
Failure to properly transition our Van Dyke’s former third-party fulfilment provider to in-house operations may result in lost sales revenue and customers. Failure to properly transition inventory receiving, storing, periodic cycle counts, pick, pack and shipping customer orders, order taking, processing of customer payments, personalization, customer services, and order processing could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Because we maintain a significant supply of cash in our locations, we may experience losses due to employee error and theft.
Because our business requires us to maintain a significant supply of cash in our stores, we are subject to the risk of cash shortages resulting from employee error and theft. We periodically experience employee error and theft in stores, which can significantly increase the operating losses of those stores for the period in which the employee error or theft is discovered. We self-insure for employee error and theft at the store level. If our controls to limit our exposure to employee error and theft at the store level and at our corporate headquarters do not operate effectively or are structured ineffectively, our operating margins could be adversely affected by costs associated with increased security and preventative measures.
Regular turnover among our location managers and employees makes it more difficult for us to operate our locations and increases our costs of operation.
We experience a relatively stable workforce among our location managers and employees. Turnover interferes with implementation of operating strategies. Increases in our workforce turnover in the future would likely increase our operating pressures and operating costs and could restrict our ability to grow. Additionally, high turnover would create challenges for us in maintaining high levels of employee awareness of and compliance with our internal procedures and external regulatory compliance requirements. In sum, high turnover would increase our training and supervisory costs, and result in decreased earnings with corresponding greater risks of regulatory non-compliance.
A significant disruption in our computer systems and our inability to adequately maintain and update those systems could adversely affect our operations and our ability to maintain guest confidence.
We rely extensively on our computer systems to manage our businesses. Our systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, malicious attacks, security breaches, and catastrophic events. If our systems are damaged or fail to function properly or reliably, we may incur substantial repair or replacement costs, experience data loss or theft and impediments to our ability to manage inventories or process guest transactions, engage in additional promotional activities to retain our guests, and encounter lost guest confidence, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
We regularly invest to maintain and update our computer systems. Implementing significant system changes increases the risk of computer system disruption. The potential problems and interruptions associated with implementing technology initiatives, as well as providing training and support for those initiatives, could disrupt or reduce our operational efficiency, and could negatively impact guest experience and guest confidence.
17
If our efforts to protect the security of information about our customers, vendors and other third parties are unsuccessful, we may face costly government enforcement actions and private litigation, and our sales and reputation could suffer.
We regularly receive and store information about our customers, vendors and other third parties. We have programs in place to detect, contain, and respond to data security incidents. However, because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and may be difficult to detect for long periods of time, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventive measures. In addition, hardware, software, or applications we develop or procure from third parties or through open source solutions may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise information security. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities, or those of third parties with whom we do business, through fraud, trickery, or other forms of deceiving our team members, contractors, and vendors.
If we, our vendors, or other third parties with whom we do business experience additional significant data security breaches or fail to detect and appropriately respond to significant data security breaches, we could be exposed to government enforcement actions or private litigation. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in our ability to protect their information, which could cause them to no longer purchase our products or use our services.
ITEM 1B UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Our headquarters is in Omaha, Nebraska. We lease a 12,420-square-foot space which is used as our corporate headquarters as well as headquarters for our Cellular Retail and Consumer Finance segments, with additional space available, which is sufficient for our projected near-term future growth. Our monthly lease amount is currently $12,225 and the lease expires on January 31, 2020. The corporate phone number is (402) 551-8888.
Our Direct to Consumer segment, acquired on July 1, 2015, owns 100-acre property with a 382,790 sq. ft. facility in Greenwood, South Carolina. This facility is utilized as J & P Park Acquisitions, Inc.’s (“JPPA”) distribution and warehouse facility and the corporate offices of JPPA and Restorers Acquisition, Inc. (“RAI”). This facility will also be utilized as the distribution and warehouse facility for Van Dykes Restorers beginning in 2018. The real estate is not encumbered as of December 31, 2017.
We are involved in a variety of legal claims and proceedings incidental to our business, including customer bankruptcy and employment-related matters from time to time, and other legal matters that arise in the normal course of business. We believe these claims and proceedings are not out of the ordinary course for a business of the type and size in which we are engaged. While we are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these claims and proceedings, management believes there is not a reasonable possibility that the costs and liabilities of such matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or consolidated results of operations.
ITEM 4 MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
18
ITEM 5 | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS |
MARKET INFORMATION
Our common stock is listed for trading under the symbol “WCRS” on the “OTCQB,” which is the OTC Markets’ middle-tier over-the-counter quotation platform. The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc., 3200 Cherry Creek Drive South, Suite 430, Denver, Colorado 80209.
On January 20, 2016, our shareholders approved a plan to reincorporate Western Capital Resources, Inc. in Delaware at a special meeting of the shareholders called for that purpose. The reincorporation was completed May 11, 2016. In September 2016 for the sole purpose of removing partial shares of common stock, we amended our Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of 5,000,000:5,000,001. In March 2017 we repurchased 106,873 shares directly from a single shareholder at a price of $4.50 per share.
The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices for our common stock as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board in 2017 and 2016. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown, or commission, and may not represent actual transactions. Trading in the Company’s common stock during the period represented was sporadic, exemplified by low trading volume and many days during which no trades occurred.
Market Bid Price (high/low) | |||||||||
For the Fiscal Year | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
First Quarter | $ | 4.80 – 2.51 | $ | 2.95 – 2.25 | |||||
Second Quarter | $ | 5.01 – 3.56 | $ | 7.00 – 2.47 | |||||
Third Quarter | $ | 4.76 – 4.11 | $ | 5.25 – 3.00 | |||||
Fourth Quarter | $ | 8.01 – 4.61 | $ | 5.00 – 4.35 |
HOLDERS
As of the date of this report, we had 9,390,997 shares of common stock outstanding held by approximately 275 holders of record.
DIVIDENDS
Holders of our common stock are entitled to share pro rata in dividends and distributions with respect to the common stock when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. In each of June, September and December 2016 and March, July, September and December 2017, we paid dividends of 2.5 cents per common share. In February 2018 we paid a dividend of 5.0 cents per common share.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The table below sets forth certain information, as of the close of business on December 31, 2017, regarding equity compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which our securities were then authorized for issuance.
Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities
Remaining Available for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column a) |
|||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by securityholders | 65,000 | 6.00 | 35,000 | (1) | |||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders | None | n/a | None |
(1) | In February 2015, our Board of Directors adopted the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2015 Stock Incentive Plan was approved by our shareholders on January 20, 2016. Refer to Note 15 “Equity” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this report for additional information. We are not required by applicable state law or the listing standards of any self-regulatory organization or quotation service (e.g., the OTC Markets, NASD, AMEX or NYSE) to obtain the approval of our security holders prior to issuing any compensatory options, warrants or other rights to purchase our securities. |
19
Certain managers of our subsidiaries have options issued for subsidiary stock, which if exercised will dilute parent’s ownership in those subsidiaries.
DESCRIPTION OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our authorized capital stock consists of 12.5 million shares of capital stock, $0.01 par value per share (unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors). All shares of common stock have equal voting rights and are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by our shareholders. Shares of our common stock have no preemptive, subscription, conversion or redemption rights and may be issued only as fully paid and non-assessable shares. Cumulative voting in the election of directors is not permitted. In the event of our liquidation, each holder of our common stock is entitled to receive a proportionate share of our assets available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of liabilities. All shares of our common stock issued and outstanding are fully paid and non-assessable.
ITEM 6 | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
Not applicable.
ITEM 7 | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes that appear elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve significant uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed in “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this report. For further information, see “Forward-Looking Statements” below.
OVERVIEW
In 2017, we sold our Franchise segment for an after tax gain of approximately $34.5 million. We intend to re-invest the net proceeds and are actively searching for investment opportunities.
Our growth focus was in the Wireless Retail segment. We began the year operating 198 Cricket retail locations and closed out the year operating 278. The growth came from a combination of launching new locations and acquiring existing stores from other Cricket dealers. This growth was a continuation of our 2016 efforts where we added a net of 99 store locations.
Excluding discontinued operations, our net income to shareholders in 2017 was $1.39 million compared to a loss in 2016 of ($1.29) million and revenues increased from $94 million in 2016 to $122 million in 2017.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016
Net income (loss) for continuing operations attributable to our common shareholders was $1.39 million, or $0.15 per share, in 2017 compared to ($1.29) million, or ($0.14) per share, in 2016. Our 2017 earnings per share from discontinued operations was $3.85 compared to $0.29 in 2016.
20
The following table provides year-over-year revenues and net income attributable to WCR common shareholders by continuing operating segment (in thousands):
Cellular Retail | Direct
to Consumer | Consumer Finance | Corporate | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 69,547 | $ | 40,993 | $ | 10,981 | $ | — | $ | 121,521 | ||||||||||
% of total revenue | 57.2 | % | 33.7 | % | 9.1 | % | — | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (57 | ) | $ | 1,837 | $ | 779 | $ | (886 | ) | $ | 1,673 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | $ | 286 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 286 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to WCR common shareholders | $ | (343 | ) | $ | 1,837 | $ | 779 | $ | (886 | ) | $ | 1,387 | ||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 39,236 | $ | 42,914 | $ | 11,843 | $ | — | $ | 93,993 | ||||||||||
% of total revenue | 41.7 | % | 45.7 | % | 12.6 | % | — | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 717 | $ | 2,245 | $ | (3,318 | ) | $ | (932 | ) | $ | (1,288 | ) | |||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to WCR common shareholders | $ | 717 | $ | 2,245 | $ | (3,318 | ) | $ | (932 | ) | $ | (1,288 | ) |
21
Cellular Retail
The following table summarizes our Cellular Retail segment operating results:
Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) | 2017 % of | 2016 % of | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | Revenues | Revenues | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Retail sales and associated fees | $ | 50,268 | $ | 30,003 | 72.3 | % | 76.5 | % | ||||||||
Other revenue | 19,279 | 9,233 | 27.7 | % | 23.5 | % | ||||||||||
69,547 | 39,236 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of revenues | 25,846 | 15,238 | 37.2 | % | 38.9 | % | ||||||||||
Gross profit | 43,701 | 23,998 | 62.8 | % | 61.1 | % | ||||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits expense | 25,008 | 13,015 | 36.0 | % | 33.2 | % | ||||||||||
Occupancy expense | 10,856 | 5,734 | 15.6 | % | 14.6 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 1,811 | 786 | 2.6 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 171 | 161 | 0.2 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||
Other expense | 6,322 | 3,102 | 9.1 | % | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | (410 | ) | 483 | (0.6 | )% | 1.2 | % | |||||||||
43,758 | 23,281 | 62.9 | % | 59.3 | % | |||||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (57 | ) | $ | 717 | (0.1 | )% | 1.8 | % |
Segment contribution to net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests was ($0.06) million and $0.72 million for the year 2017 and 2016, respectively. Throughout 2016 and 2017 we opened 132 new locations and acquired another 15 that had recently opened. With the launch of a new location, we incur operating costs similar to a “mature” location, yet revenues ramp up gradually over time, resulting in losses. As evidenced above, the magnitude of the new store launch growth initiative has impacted both our revenue and operating results.
Year-over-year net income (loss) in the Cellular Retail segment decreased $0.77 million, or 107.9%, to ($0.06) million. This decrease is due primarily to losses related to our expansion initiative.
Other revenue in this segment includes customer paid fees, compensation received from Cricket that is based on Cricket customer payments of their monthly service fees and development compensation received from Cricket. The growing customer base on which we received compensation from Cricket, which is tied to our growth, as well as non-recurring expansion incentive compensation from Cricket Wireless, are contributing factors to the year over year increase.
Cost of revenues as a percentage of retail merchandise sales and associated fees increased from 50.8% in 2016 to 51.4% in 2017, an increase of 60 bps. We have increased our offering of discounts in 2017 compared to 2016 to entice new customer sales, the benefit of which we hope to see long-term in other revenue.
Our two most significant operating expense categories for this segment are salaries, wages and benefits and occupancy expenses. Salaries, wages and benefits expense increased 92.1% from 2016 due to the additional stores operated. Stated as a percentage of Cellular Retail revenues, salaries, wages and benefits expense was 36.0% and 33.2% for the year 2017 and 2016, respectively. Occupancy expenses, which include base rents, additional rents (common area maintenance, insurance and real estate taxes assessed operating per lease agreements), telephone, utility and repair and maintenance expenses, were 15.6% and 14.6% of Cellular Retail revenues for the year 2017 and 2016, respectively. These percentage increases are related to the growth in locations operated where costs related to an expansion store are similar to a mature store but revenues are in a ramp-up mode.
22
Direct to Consumer
The following table summarizes our actual Direct to Consumer segment operating results:
Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) | 2017 % of | 2016 % of | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | Revenues | Revenues | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Sales | $ | 40,864 | $ | 42,730 | 99.7 | % | 99.6 | % | ||||||||
Other revenue | 129 | 184 | 0.3 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||
40,993 | 42,914 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of revenues | 20,988 | 21,473 | 51.2 | % | 50.0 | % | ||||||||||
Gross profit | 20,005 | 21,441 | 48.8 | % | 50.0 | % | ||||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits expense | 5,968 | 6,297 | 14.6 | % | 14.7 | % | ||||||||||
Occupancy expense | 772 | 860 | 1.9 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 453 | 428 | 1.1 | % | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 132 | 150 | 0.3 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||
Other expense | 10,176 | 10,264 | 24.8 | % | 23.9 | % | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 667 | 1,197 | 1.6 | % | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||
18,168 | 19,196 | 44.3 | % | 44.8 | % | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,837 | $ | 2,245 | 4.5 | % | 5.2 | % |
The Direct to Consumer segment contributed $1.84 million of net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $2.25 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. In 2017, we faced challenges with our 3PL provider and began the process of moving all operations, including inventory receiving, storing, periodic cycle counts, pick, pack and shipment of customer orders, order taking, processing of customer payments, personalization, customer services, and order processing, to our facility in South Carolina. The home improvement and restoration division experienced a 12.8% reduction in revenue year over year and a corresponding reduction to net income of $0.33 million.
Consumer Finance
The following table summarizes our Consumer Finance segment operating results:
Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) | 2017 % of | 2016 % of | ||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | Revenues | Revenues | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Retail sales | $ | 1,459 | $ | 1,481 | 13.3 | % | 12.5 | % | ||||||||
Financing fees and interest | 9,101 | 9,882 | 82.9 | % | 83.4 | % | ||||||||||
Other revenue | 421 | 480 | 3.8 | % | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||
10,981 | 11,843 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of revenues | 2,029 | 2,497 | 18.5 | % | 21.1 | % | ||||||||||
Gross profit | 8,952 | 9,346 | 81.5 | % | 78.9 | % | ||||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits expense | 3,663 | 3,868 | 33.3 | % | 32.7 | % | ||||||||||
Occupancy expense | 1,297 | 1,489 | 11.8 | % | 12.6 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 64 | 90 | 0.6 | % | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge | — | 7,559 | — | % | 63.8 | % | ||||||||||
Other expense | 2,162 | 1,685 | 19.7 | % | 14.2 | % | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 987 | (2,027 | ) | 9.0 | % | (17.1 | )% | |||||||||
8,173 | 12,664 | 74.4 | % | 106.9 | % | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 779 | $ | (3,318 | ) | 7.1 | % | (28.0 | )% |
Our year over year financing fees and interest decline was an expected decrease resulting from a law change in South Dakota and our exit from the state. Our 2016 income statement includes a noncash goodwill impairment charge of $7.56 million and related deferred tax benefit of $2.88 million. This was a 100% write-off goodwill associated with the Consumer Finance segment. Consumer Finance had operations in seven states during 2017.
23
Corporate
Net loss related to our Corporate segment was ($0.89) million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to ($0.93) million for the year ended December 31, 2016. In accordance with authoritative guidance applicable to discontinued operations, no continuing corporate overhead has been allocated to discontinued operations and has been re-allocated for 2016. Comparable Corporate costs have been increased from those reported in previously filed reports as a result.
Consolidated Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense on continuing operations for 2017 was $0.73 million compared to a tax benefit of $0.85 million in 2016 for an effective rate of 30.4% and 39.6%, respectively. The change in effective rate is primarily due to the addition of a subsidiary with a noncontrolling interest where taxable income flows through to the noncontrolling interest and thus is not taxable income to the Company, partially offset by the added income tax expense resulting from the change in the future federal tax rate as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Reform Act”) enacted on December 22, 2017 and its impact on deferred income taxes.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Summary cash flow data is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Cash flows provided (used) by: | ||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 5,015,349 | $ | 9,630,007 | ||||
Investing activities | 14,214,425 | (5,141,887 | ) | |||||
Financing activities | (12,093,930 | ) | 1,824,186 | |||||
Net increase in cash | 7,135,844 | 6,312,306 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 14,159,975 | 7,847,669 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ | 21,295,819 | $ | 14,159,975 |
At December 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $21.30 million compared to cash and cash equivalents of $14.16 million on December 31, 2016. For 2018, we believe that our available cash, combined with expected cash flows from operations and our held-to-maturity investments, will be sufficient to fund our liquidity and capital expenditure requirements through March of 2019. Our expected short-term uses of available cash include the funding of operating activities, payment of income tax liabilities related to our sale of the Franchise segment and the payment of dividends.
At December 31, 2017, we had $14 million invested in certificates of deposit (limited to $250,000 per financial institution) and approximately $32 million in short-term T-Bills and in U.S. Treasury money market funds.
In October 2017, we paid off all principal outstanding on our credit facilities with a financial institution in the amount of $6.97 million.
At December 31, 2017, our outstanding debt and capital lease obligations were $0.94 million compared to $10.66 million at December 31, 2016. Available credit at December 31, 2017 under credit facilities in place on that date was $12.0 million.
On April 21, 2016, we entered into a revolver and acquisition credit facility with a financial institution. The facility includes a $9 million dollar acquisition facility commitment and a $3 million revolver credit commitment. Interest accrues on advanced funds at LIBOR plus 3.5%. The facility matures on April 21, 2018. The facility contains customary financial and negative covenants and is secured by substantially all assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applied on a consistent basis. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We evaluate these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. We base these estimates on the information currently available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could vary materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
24
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1, “Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this report. We believe that the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Receivables and Loss Allowance
Direct to Consumer
Receivables are recorded when billed or accrued and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash. The carrying value of receivables, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, represents their estimated net realizable value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on historical collection trends, type of customer, the age of outstanding receivables and existing economic conditions. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that specific receivable balances may be impaired, further consideration is given to the collectability of those balances and the allowance is adjusted accordingly. Past due receivable balances are written-off when internal collection efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting the amount due.
Consumer Finance
Included in loans receivable are unpaid principal, interest and fee balances of payday, installment, pawn and title loans that have not reached their maturity date, and “late” payday loans that have reached maturity within the last 180 days and have remaining outstanding balances. Late payday loans generally are unpaid loans where a customer’s personal check has been deposited and the check has been returned due to non-sufficient funds in the customer’s account, a closed account, or other reasons. All returned items are charged-off after 180 days, as collections after that date have not been significant. Loans are carried at cost plus accrued interest or fees less payments made and a loans receivable allowance.
We do not specifically reserve for any individual payday, installment or title loan. Instead, we aggregate loan types for purposes of estimating the loss allowance using a methodology that analyzes historical portfolio statistics and management’s judgment regarding recent trends noted in the portfolio. This methodology takes into account several factors, including (1) the amount of loan principal, interest and fee outstanding, (2) historical charge offs from loans that originated during the last 24 months, (3) current and expected collection patterns and (4) current economic trends. We utilize a software program to assist with the tracking of our historical portfolio statistics. A loan loss allowance is maintained for anticipated losses for payday and installment loans based primarily on our historical percentages by loan type of net charge offs, applied against the applicable balance of loan principal, interest and fees outstanding. We also periodically perform a look-back analysis on our loan loss allowance to verify the historical allowance established tracks with the actual subsequent loan write-offs and recoveries. We are aware that as conditions change, we may also need to make additional allowances in future periods. Loan losses or charge-offs of pawn or title loans are not recorded because the value of the collateral exceeds the loan amount.
See Note 4 “Loans Receivable” and Note 5 “Loans Receivable Allowance” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this report for our outstanding loans receivable aging and loans receivable allowance rollforward as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Inventory
We value inventories at the lower of cost or market. Reserves for excess and obsolescence are estimated and recorded to reduce the carrying value to estimated net realizable value. The amount of the reserve is determined based on historical usage, projected sales information, plans for discontinued products and other factors. Though management considers these reserves adequate and proper, changes in sales volumes due to unexpected economic or competitive conditions are among the factors that could materially affect the adequacy of this reserve.
Long-lived Assets
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the asset. The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to operations as incurred while renewals and betterments are capitalized.
25
Finite-lived intangible assets represent the fair values management assigned to assets acquired through business acquisitions, are amortized over periods of three to 15 years based on management’s estimates of the useful life of the asset and are subject to impairment evaluations.
We assess the possibility of impairment of long-lived assets, other than goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future cash flows, significant changes in the manner of use of acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business, and significant negative industry events or trends.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of identifiable finite lived net assets acquired and is not amortized. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of October 1, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate potential impairment. We test for goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level, which aligns with the Company’s segments. We perform a qualitative assessment to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. If quantitative testing is necessary based on a qualitative assessment, we apply a fair value test. This fair value test involves a two-step process. The first step is to compare the carrying value of our net assets to our fair value. If the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value, a second step is performed to measure the amount of the impairment, if any.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have no off balance sheet arrangements.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements made in this report are “forward-looking statements,” as that term is defined under Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are based upon our current expectations and projections about future events. Whenever used in this report, the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “will” and similar expressions, or the negative of such words and expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such words or expressions. The forward-looking statements in this report are primarily located in the material set forth under the headings “Description of Business,” “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” but are found in other parts of this report as well. These forward-looking statements generally relate to our plans, objectives and expectations for future operations and are based upon management’s current estimates and projections of future results or trends. Although we believe that our plans and objectives reflected in or suggested by these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we may not achieve these plans or objectives. You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We will not update forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future.
Specific factors that might cause actual results to differ from our expectations or may affect the value of the common stock, include, but are not limited to:
● | Changes in local, state or federal laws and regulations governing lending practices, or changes in the interpretation of such laws and regulations; |
● | Litigation and regulatory actions directed toward the consumer finance industry or us, particularly in certain key states; |
● | Our need for additional financing; |
● | Change in our authorization to be a dealer for Cricket Wireless; |
● | Change in authorized Cricket dealer compensation; |
● | Lack in advertising support and sales promotions from Cricket Wireless in the markets we operate; and |
● | Unpredictability or uncertainty in financing and merger and acquisition markets, which could impair our ability to grow our business through acquisitions. |
Other factors that could cause actual results to differ from those implied by the forward-looking statements in this report are more fully described in the “Risk Factors” section and of this report.
26
Industry data and other statistical information used in this report are based on independent publications, government publications, reports by market research firms or other published independent sources. Some data are also based on our good faith estimates, derived from our review of internal surveys and the independent sources listed above. Although we believe these sources are reliable, we have not independently verified the information.
ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not applicable.
27
ITEM 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONTENTS
Page(s) | ||
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS | F-1 – F-2 | |
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | ||
Consolidated Balance Sheets | F-3 | |
Consolidated Statements of Income | F-4 | |
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity | F-5 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | F-6 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-7 |
28
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Western Capital Resources, Inc.:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Western Capital Resources, Inc. (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2017, and the related consolidated statement of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We also have audited the adjustments to the 2016 consolidated financial statements to retrospectively apply the effect of discontinued operations, as described in Note 19. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2016 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than with respect to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2016 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.
Salt Lake City, UT
March 29, 2018
office 801.783.2950
fax 801.783.2950
www.sadlergibb.com | Main: 2455 East Parleys Way Suite 320, Salt Lake City, UT 84109 | Provo: 3507 N University Ave #100, Provo, UT 84604
F- 1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Western Capital Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Western Capital Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Western Capital Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ KLJ & Associates, LLP
KLJ & Associates, LLP
Edina, MN
March 31, 2017
5201 Eden Avenue
Suite 300
Edina, MN 55436
630.277.2330
F- 2
WESTERN CAPITAL RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 21,295,819 | $ | 14,159,975 | ||||
Short-term investments | 32,292,902 | — | ||||||
Loans receivable (less allowance for losses of $833,000 and $1,036,000, respectively) | 4,310,003 | 4,438,276 | ||||||
Accounts receivable (less allowance for losses of $16,000 and $13,000, respectively) | 764,071 | 696,657 | ||||||
Inventory | 9,130,842 | 9,095,460 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other | 3,762,974 | 3,399,433 | ||||||
Escrow and other receivables | 3,482,770 | — | ||||||
Other current assets of discontinued operations | — | 1,348,061 | ||||||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 75,039,381 | 33,137,862 | ||||||
INVESTMENTS | 3,000,000 | — | ||||||
NOTE RECEIVABLE | — | 2,920,112 | ||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net | 11,347,234 | 9,409,234 | ||||||
GOODWILL | 5,796,528 | 5,796,528 | ||||||
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net | 4,987,769 | 1,295,559 | ||||||
ESCROW FUNDS RECEIVABLE | 3,250,000 | — | ||||||
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES | — | 518,000 | ||||||
OTHER | 823,244 | 1,001,466 | ||||||
NONCURRENT ASSETS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | — | 6,649,891 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 104,244,156 | $ | 60,728,652 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 11,897,968 | $ | 11,626,627 | ||||
Other current liabilities | 1,354,558 | 1,198,311 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 18,730,647 | 95,551 | ||||||
Note payable – short-term | 51,992 | 55,819 | ||||||
Current portion long-term debt | — | 1,780,000 | ||||||
Current portion capital lease obligations | 47,174 | 46,400 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | 1,073,600 | 1,173,660 | ||||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations | — | 2,851,395 | ||||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 33,155,939 | 18,827,763 | ||||||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | ||||||||
Notes payable, net of current portion | 789,216 | 8,681,545 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion | 51,172 | 94,762 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 1,456,000 | — | ||||||
Other | 98,259 | — | ||||||
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations | — | 2,436,080 | ||||||
TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | 2,394,647 | 11,212,387 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES | 35,550,586 | 30,040,150 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 21) | ||||||||
EQUITY | ||||||||
WESTERN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 and no par value, 12,500,000 shares authorized, 9,390,997 and 9,497,871 issued and outstanding. | 939 | 950 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 29,031,741 | 28,997,087 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 37,903,204 | 1,643,996 | ||||||
TOTAL WESTERN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | 66,935,884 | 30,642,033 | ||||||
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS | 1,757,686 | 46,469 | ||||||
TOTAL EQUITY | 68,693,570 | 30,688,502 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | $ | 104,244,156 | $ | 60,728,652 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 3
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 4
WESTERN CAPITAL RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Western Capital Resources, Inc. Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional Paid-In | Retained | Noncontrolling | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Interests | |||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE – December 31, 2015 | $ | 29,858,509 | 9,497,534 | $ | — | $ | 28,934,392 | $ | 898,038 | $ | 26,079 | |||||||||||||
Net Income | 1,478,708 | — | — | — | 1,458,318 | 20,390 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share based compensation | 63,645 | — | — | 63,645 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Recapitalization | — | — | 950 | (950 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Elimination of Fractional Shares (Rounding up or down) | — | 337 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends | (712,360 | ) | — | — | — | (712,360 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
BALANCE – December 31, 2016 | 30,688,502 | 9,497,871 | 950 | 28,997,087 | 1,643,996 | 46,469 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Income | 37,978,073 | — | — | — | 37,679,225 | 298,848 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share based compensation | 34,654 | — | — | 34,654 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest in acquisition | 1,471,653 | — | — | — | — | 1,471,653 | ||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of noncontrolling interests | (27,899 | ) | — | — | — | — | (27,899 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock redemption | (480,928 | ) | (106,874 | ) | (11 | ) | — | (480,917 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Dividends | (970,485 | ) | — | — | — | (939,100 | ) | (31,385 | ) | |||||||||||||||
BALANCE – December 31, 2017 | $ | 68,693,570 | 9,390,997 | $ | 939 | $ | 29,031,741 | $ | 37,903,204 | $ | 1,757,686 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 5
WESTERN CAPITAL RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Net Income (Loss) from continuing operations | $ | 1,673,007 | $ | (1,288,026 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation – continuing operations | 1,809,525 | 1,085,404 | ||||||
Amortization – continuing operations | 534,898 | 218,602 | ||||||
Share based compensation | 27,924 | 62,695 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 570,000 | (2,127,000 | ) | |||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 22,131 | 26,443 | ||||||
Goodwill and intangible impairment charge | — | 7,559,063 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Loans receivable | 128,273 | 446,162 | ||||||
Accounts receivable | (67,414 | ) | 117,089 | |||||
Inventory | (35,382 | ) | (1,477,610 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (32,425 | ) | (1,579,071 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (1,418,872 | ) | 4,973,239 | |||||
Deferred revenue and other current liabilities | (42,072 | ) | (1,446,548 | ) | ||||
Operating cash flows from discontinued operations | 1,845,756 | 3,059,565 | ||||||
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities | 5,015,349 | 9,630,007 | ||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Purchase of investments | (35,292,902 | ) | — | |||||
Purchase of property and equipment – continuing operations | (2,616,616 | ) | (1,943,214 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of stores, net of cash acquired | — | (588,241 | ) | |||||
Advances on note receivable, net | (513,743 | ) | (2,920,112 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the disposal of property, plant and equipment | 16,959 | 109,350 | ||||||
Cash received from discontinued operations | 4,368,037 | 217,924 | ||||||
Investing activities of discontinued operations | 48,252,690 | (17,594 | ) | |||||
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) investing activities | 14,214,425 | (5,141,887 | ) | |||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Payments on notes payable – short-term, net | (96,722 | ) | (28,190 | ) | ||||
Advances (payments) on line of credit, net | (998,426 | ) | 998,426 | |||||
Advances on notes payable – long-term | — | 3,818,301 | ||||||
Payments on notes payable – long-term, continuing operations | (5,128,896 | ) | (726,642 | ) | ||||
Common stock redemption | (480,928 | ) | — | |||||
Advances on capital lease | — | 185,318 | ||||||
Payments on capital lease | (42,816 | ) | (69,882 | ) | ||||
Payment of dividends | (939,100 | ) | (712,360 | ) | ||||
Other financing activities of discontinued operations | (4,407,042 | ) | (1,640,785 | ) | ||||
Net cash and cash equivalents provide by (used in) financing activities | (12,093,930 | ) | 1,824,186 | |||||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 7,135,844 | 6,312,306 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | ||||||||
Beginning of year | 14,159,975 | 7,847,669 | ||||||
End of year | $ | 21,295,819 | $ | 14,159,975 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | ||||||||
Income taxes paid | $ | 3,869,818 | $ | 3,845,718 | ||||
Interest paid | $ | 189,436 | $ | 615,094 | ||||
Noncash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||
Note receivable balance applied to acquisition of stores (Notes 10 and 18) | $ | 3,433,856 | $ | — | ||||
Financed acquisition of stores (Notes 13 and 18) | $ | 789,216 | $ | — | ||||
Noncontrolling interests equity contribution in acquisition of stores (Note 18) | $ | 1,471,653 | $ | — | ||||
Note principal and interest paid from sales proceeds | $ | 4,343,474 | $ | — | ||||
Sales proceeds placed in escrow | $ | 6,500,000 | $ | — | ||||
Long-term debt proceeds used to pay off debt and interest | $ | $ | 3,021,699 | |||||
Long-term debt proceeds used to pay prepaid financing costs | $ | $ | 60,000 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 6
1. Basis of Presentation, Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies –
Basis of Presentation / Nature of Business
Western Capital Resources, Inc. (WCR) is a parent company owning operating subsidiaries, with percentage owned shown parenthetically, as summarized below.
● | Cellular Retail |
○ | PQH Wireless, Inc. (PQH) (100%) – operates 278 cellular retail stores as of December 31, 2017 (219 100% owned plus 59 through a 70% owned subsidiary), as an exclusive dealer of the Cricket brand. |
● | Direct to Consumer |
○ | J & P Park Acquisitions, Inc. (JPPA) (100%) – an online and direct marketing distribution retailer of live plants, seeds, holiday gifts and garden accessories selling its products under Park Seed, Jackson & Perkins, and Wayside Gardens brand names as well as a wholesaler under the Park Wholesale brand. |
○ | Restorers Acquisition, Inc. (RAI) (100%) – an online and direct marketing distribution retailer of home improvement and restoration products operating under the Van Dyke’s Restorers brand. RAI merged into JPPA on December 30, 2017. |
○ | J & P Real Estate, LLC (JPRE) (100%) – owns real estate utilized as JPPA’s distribution and warehouse facility and the corporate offices of JPPA and RAI. |
● | Consumer Finance |
○ | Wyoming Financial Lenders, Inc. (WFL) (100%) – owns and operates “payday” stores (40 as of December 31, 2017) in seven states (Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, Wisconsin and Wyoming) providing sub-prime short-term uncollateralized non-recourse “cash advance” or “payday” loans typically ranging from $100 to $500 with a maturity of generally two to four weeks, sub-prime short-term uncollateralized non-recourse installment loans typically ranging from $300 to $800 with a maturity of six months, check cashing and other money services to individuals. |
○ | Express Pawn, Inc. (EPI) (100%) – owns and operates retail pawn stores (three as of December 31, 2017) in Nebraska and Iowa providing collateralized non-recourse pawn loans and retail sales of merchandise obtained from forfeited pawn loans or purchased from customers. |
● | Discontinued Operations - Franchise |
○ | AlphaGraphics, Inc. (AGI) – franchisor of domestic and international AlphaGraphics Business Centers which specialize in the planning, production, and management of visual communications for businesses and individuals throughout the world. AGI was sold on October 2, 2017. |
References in these financial statement notes to “Company” or “we” refer to Western Capital Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries. References to specific companies within our enterprise, such as” “PQH,” “JPPA,” “RAI,” “JPRE,” “WFL,” “EPI” or “AGI” are references only to those companies.
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of WCR, its wholly owned subsidiaries and other entities in which the Company owns a controlling financial interest. For financial interests in which the Company owns a controlling financial interest, the Company applies the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, “Consolidation” applicable to reporting the equity and net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interests. All significant intercompany balances and transactions of the Company have been eliminated in consolidation.
F- 7
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect certain reported amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant management estimates relate to the notes and loans receivable allowance, carrying value and impairment of long-lived goodwill and intangible assets, inventory valuation and obsolescence, estimated useful lives of property and equipment, gift certificate and merchandise credits liability and deferred taxes and tax uncertainties.
Revenue Recognition
Cellular Retail
Sales revenue for sales of phones and accessories and dealer compensation for related activations is recognized in the period in which the sale is completed (retail sales and associated fees). Customer service fees are recognized upon completion of the service and payment received. Other dealer compensation not attributed to phone activations is recorded in the period earned as reported to us by Cricket Wireless. All sales are presented net of sales taxes, which are excluded from revenue.
Direct to Consumer
Sales revenue is recognized in the period in which product is shipped. Sales billed or cash received in advance of actual shipment are deferred and recorded as income in the period in which shipment is made. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers is included in net sales. Shipping and handling costs are expensed as incurred and included in cost of sales. All sales are presented net of sales taxes, which are excluded from revenue.
Consumer Finance
Loan fees and interest on cash advance loans are recognized on a constant-yield basis ratably over a loan’s term. Title and installment loan fees and interest are recognized using the interest method, except that installment loan origination fees are recognized as they become non-refundable and installment loan maintenance fees are recognized when earned. The Company recognizes fees on pawn loans on a constant-yield basis ratably over the loans’ terms. No fees are recognized on forfeited pawn loans.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Fair Value of Financial Measurement
In determining fair value measurements, the Company follows the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. The topic provides a consistent definition of fair value focusing on an exit price, which is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The topic also prioritizes, within the measurement of fair value, the use of market-based information over entity-specific information and establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based on the nature of inputs used in the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three level hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1 - Pricing inputs are quoted prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the measurement date.
Level 2 - Pricing inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term through corroboration with observable market data.
F- 8
Level 3 - Pricing inputs are unobservable for the assets and liabilities, that is, inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an asset or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
The Company’s held to maturity securities are comprised of a U.S Treasury zero coupon T-Bill and certificates of deposit. The Company’s available for sale securities consist of mutual funds held in money market mutual funds in a brokerage account, which are classified as cash equivalents.
The fair value of these investments is based on quoted prices from recognized pricing services, or in the case of mutual funds, at their closing published net asset value.
The Company assesses the levels of the investments at each measurement date, and transfers between levels are recognized on the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer in accordance with the Company’s accounting policy regarding the recognition of transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no transfers between levels.
Receivables and Loss Allowance
Direct to Consumer
Receivables for noncash sales are recorded when orders are shipped and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash. The carrying value of receivables, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, represents their estimated net realizable value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on historical collection trends, type of customer, the age of outstanding receivables and existing economic conditions. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that specific receivable balances may be impaired, further consideration is given to the collectability of those balances and the allowance is adjusted accordingly. Past due receivable balances are written-off when internal collection efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting the amount due.
Consumer Finance
Included in loans receivable are unpaid principal, interest and fee balances of payday, installment, pawn and title loans that have not reached their maturity date, and “late” payday loans that have reached maturity within the last 180 days and have remaining outstanding balances. Late payday loans generally are unpaid loans where a customer’s personal check has been deposited and the check has been returned due to non-sufficient funds in the customer’s account, a closed account, or other reasons. All returned items are charged-off after 180 days, as collections after that date have not been significant. Loans are carried at cost plus accrued interest or fees less payments made and a loans receivable allowance.
The Company does not specifically reserve for any individual payday, installment or title loan. The Company aggregates loan types for purposes of estimating the loss allowance using a methodology that analyzes historical portfolio statistics and management’s judgment regarding recent trends noted in the portfolio. This methodology takes into account several factors, including (1) the amount of loan principal, interest and fee outstanding, (2) historical charge offs from loans that originated during the last 24 months, (3) current and expected collection patterns and (4) current economic trends. The Company utilizes a software program to assist with the tracking of its historical portfolio statistics. A loan loss allowance is maintained for anticipated losses for payday and installment loans based primarily on our historical percentages by loan type of net charge offs, applied against the applicable balance of loan principal, interest and fees outstanding. The Company also periodically performs a look-back analysis on its loan loss allowance to verify the historical allowance established tracks with the actual subsequent loan write-offs and recoveries. The Company is aware that as conditions change, it may also need to make additional allowances in future periods. Loan losses or charge-offs of pawn or title loans are not recorded because the value of the collateral exceeds the loan amount.
F- 9
Inventory
Cellular Retail
Inventory, consisting of phones and accessories, is stated at cost, determined on the specific identification and weighted-average cost basis, respectively.
Direct to Consumer
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market using the weighted-average method of determining cost.
Consumer Finance
Merchandise inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. The principal amount of an unpaid loan becomes the inventory cost for forfeited collateral.
Long-Lived Assets
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets as follows:
● | Computer equipment and software | 3 – 10 years |
● | Improvements and equipment | 3 – 15 years |
● | Building | 39 years |
The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to operations as incurred while renewals and betterments are capitalized.
The Company capitalizes certain internal costs, including payroll costs, incurred in connection with the development of software for internal use. These costs are capitalized beginning when the Company has entered the application development stage. The capitalization of these costs ceases when the software is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Only costs incurred for enhancements that are expected to result in additional features or functionality are capitalized and expensed over the estimated useful life of the enhancements.
Finite-lived intangible assets represent the fair values management assigned to assets acquired through business acquisitions, are amortized over periods of three to 15 years based on management’s estimates of the useful life of the asset and are subject to impairment evaluations.
The Company assesses the possibility of impairment of long-lived assets, other than goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future cash flows, significant changes in the manner of use of acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business, and significant negative industry events or trends.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of identifiable finite lived net assets acquired and is not amortized. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of October 1, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate potential impairment. The Company tests for goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level, which aligns with the Company’s segments. The Company performs a qualitative assessment to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. If quantitative testing is necessary based on a qualitative assessment, we apply a fair value test. This fair value test involves a two-step process. The first step is to compare the carrying value of our net assets to our fair value. If the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value, a second step is performed to measure the amount of the impairment, if any.
F- 10
Merchandise Credits and Gift Card Liabilities
Direct to Consumer
The Company maintains a liability for unredeemed gift cards, gift certificates and merchandise credits until the earlier of redemption, escheatment or a maximum of two years. The Company has concluded based on historical redemption trends that the likelihood of these liabilities being redeemed beyond two years from the date of issuance is remote. The liability is also reserved for estimated redemption rates which management bases on historical trends.
Advertising, Marketing and Development Costs
Direct to Consumer
The Company expenses advertising costs as they are incurred, except for direct-response advertising, which is capitalized and amortized over its expected period of future benefits, not to exceed six months. Direct-response advertising consists primarily of catalog book production, printing, and postage costs. Prepaid advertising costs at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $0.87 million and $1.08 million, respectively.
Consumer Finance
The costs of advertising and marketing are expensed as incurred.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company accounts for its employee stock-based compensation plans using the fair value method. The fair value method requires the Company to estimate the grant-date fair value of its stock-based awards and amortize this fair value to compensation expense over the requisite service period or vesting term.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the Company’s stock option awards. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, the risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. Due to the inherent limitations of option-valuation models, future events that are unpredictable and the estimation process utilized in determining the valuation of the stock-based awards, the ultimate value realized by award holders may vary significantly from the amounts expensed in the Company’s financial statements.
Stock-based compensation expense is recognized net of estimated forfeitures such that expense is recognized only for those stock-based awards that are expected to vest. A forfeiture rate is estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from initial estimate.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable in the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. The provision for income taxes represents taxes paid or payable for the current year and changes during the year in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Net Income Per Common Share
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing the income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period, including stock options, using the treasury stock method. Options to purchase 65,000 shares granted under the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan effective February 6, 2015 (see Note 15) were outstanding at December 31, 2017. These options have a strike price in excess of the market price as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, were antidilutive and therefore not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. Thus, there were no dilutive common shares as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
F- 11
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash, short-term investments, accounts and loans receivable, inventory, and accounts payable are short-term in nature and their carrying values approximate fair values. The amounts reported in the balance sheets for notes payable are both long-term and short-term and for investments are long-term and their carrying value approximates fair value.
Reclassifications and Discontinued Operations
Certain Balance Sheet, Statement of Income and Statement of Cash Flows reclassifications have been made in the presentation of our prior financial statements and accompanying notes to conform to the presentation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.
In accordance with ASC 205-20-45-6 interest on debt required to be paid as a result of our Franchise segment disposal transaction has been allocated to discontinued operations and in accordance with ASC 205-20-45-9 general corporate overhead has not been allocated to discontinued operations. These re-allocations and related income tax have been made in the presentation of our prior financial statements and accompanying notes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under US GAAP. This standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company has evaluated this standard and determined it will have no impact on our financial condition, results of operations and consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740), related to balance sheet classification of deferred taxes which will require entities to present deferred tax assets (DTAs) and deferred tax liabilities (DTLs) as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The ASU simplifies the current guidance (ASC 740-10-45-4), which requires entities to separately present DTAs and DTLs as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within that annual period, with early adoption permitted. The Company early adopted the ASU during our first quarter of fiscal year 2016 on a retrospective basis.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), related to recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that annual period, with early adoption permitted and to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the ASU will have on our financial condition, results of operations and consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), related to the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments. The standard requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within that annual period, with early adoption permitted and the standard to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the ASU will have on our financial condition, results of operations and consolidated financial statements.
No other new accounting pronouncements issued or effective during the fiscal year have had or are expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
2. Risks Inherent in the Operating Environment –
Regulatory
The Company’s Consumer Finance segment activities are highly regulated under numerous federal, state, and local laws, regulations and rules, which are subject to change. New laws, regulations or rules could be enacted or issued, interpretations of existing laws, regulations or rules may change and enforcement action by regulatory agencies may intensify. Over the past several years, consumer advocacy groups and certain media reports have advocated governmental and regulatory action to prohibit or severely restrict sub-prime lending activities of the kind conducted by the Company. After several years of research, debate, and public hearings, in October 2017 the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued new rules for payday lending. The proposed rules, scheduled to go into effect in August 2019, would impose significant restrictions on the industry, and it is expected that a large number of lenders would be forced to close their stores. The CFPB’s studies projected a reduction in the number of lenders by 50%, while industry studies forecast a much higher attrition rate. At this time it is uncertain whether the rule will be implemented as announced, rewritten with more favorable terms for the industry, or thrown out altogether. If the rule is implemented as written, it could have a significant and negative impact on business conducted within our Consumer Finance segment.
F- 12
The above rule or any other adverse change in present federal, state, or local laws or regulations that govern or otherwise affect lending could result in the Consumer Finance segment’s curtailment or cessation of operations in certain or all jurisdictions or locations. Furthermore, any failure to comply with any applicable local, state or federal laws or regulations could result in fines, litigation, closure of one or more store locations or negative publicity. Any such change or failure would have a corresponding impact on the Company’s and segment’s results of operations and financial condition, primarily through a decrease in revenues resulting from the cessation or curtailment of operations, decrease in operating income through increased legal expenditures or fines, and could also negatively affect the Company’s general business prospects due to lost or decreased operating income or if negative publicity effects its ability to obtain additional financing as needed.
In addition, the passage of federal, state or local laws and regulations or changes in interpretations of them could, at any point, essentially prohibit the Consumer Finance segment from conducting its lending business in its current form. Any such legal or regulatory change would certainly have a material and adverse effect on the Company, its operating results, financial condition and prospects, and perhaps even the viability of the Consumer Finance segment.
Concentrations
The Company has demand deposits at financial institutions, often times in excess of the limit for insurance by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had demand deposits in excess of insurance amounts of approximately $6.78 million.
Loans receivable in the Consumer Finance segment are concentrated in the sub-prime market and geographically, primarily in the Midwest. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Consumer Finance segment had geographic economic and regulatory risk concentrations (shown as a percentage of applicable segment’s revenue by state when 10% or more) as follows:
Consumer Finance Segment | ||||||||
2017 % of Revenues | 2016 % of Revenues | |||||||
Nebraska | 37 | % | 36 | % | ||||
North Dakota | 23 | % | 20 | % | ||||
Wyoming | 13 | % | 13 | % | ||||
Iowa | 16 | % | 16 | % |
The Company’s Wireless Retail segment is an exclusive dealer for Cricket. As a dealer operating exclusively for a single carrier, the Company is subject to a number of concentrations, including revenues from a single brand, a single supplier for phones, a single operating system provider and select third party processors.
Our Direct to Consumer subsidiary JPPA has an agreement with a third party wholesale grower that is in effect until 2019. The grower has agreed to perform research for JPPA and maintain JPPA’s research crop in exchange for a reduction in royalties to be paid to JPPA for growing JPPA’s patented roses. There is an option to renew the agreement for consecutive two year terms and the agreement calls for a 24 month notice prior to termination.
RAI has an agreement with a single third-party fulfillment provider. For non-drop ship orders, the fulfillment provider receives and stores inventory, performs periodic cycle counts, picks, packs and ships customer orders. Additional services such as, order taking, processing of customer payments, personalization, customer services, and order processing are also performed by the fulfillment provider. The Company has started the process to move these services to our owned facility in South Carolina.
F- 13
3. Cash Equivalents and Investments –
The following table shows the Company’s cash equivalents and held-to-maturity investments, by significant investment category, recorded as cash equivalents or short- and long-term investments as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | ||||||||
Operating accounts | $ | 10,524,923 | $ | 14,159,975 | ||||
Certificates of deposit | 750,000 | — | ||||||
Money Market Funds - U.S. Treasury obligations | 10,020,896 | — | ||||||
Subtotal | 21,295,819 | 14,159,975 | ||||||
Held to Maturity Investments | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit ( 4 – 15 month maturities, FDIC insured) | $ | 13,250,000 | $ | — | ||||
T-Bill Zero CPN 04/05/2018 (amortized cost) | 22,042,902 | — | ||||||
Subtotal | 35,292,902 | — | ||||||
TOTAL | $ | 56,588,721 | $ | 14,159,975 |
Interest income recognized on held to maturity investments was $75,092 and $0 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
4. Loans Receivable –
At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Consumer Finance segment’s outstanding loans receivable aging was as follows:
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Payday | Installment | Pawn & Title | Total | |||||||||||||
Current | $ | 3,550,077 | $ | 271,926 | $ | 318,361 | $ | 4,140,364 | ||||||||
1-30 | 216,376 | 47,356 | — | 263,732 | ||||||||||||
31-60 | 187,916 | 27,766 | — | 215,682 | ||||||||||||
61-90 | 150,278 | 17,976 | — | 168,254 | ||||||||||||
91-120 | 110,943 | 11,870 | — | 122,813 | ||||||||||||
121-150 | 131,171 | 4,748 | — | 135,919 | ||||||||||||
151-180 | 93,222 | 3,017 | — | 96,239 | ||||||||||||
4,439,983 | 384,659 | 318,361 | 5,143,003 | |||||||||||||
Less Allowance | (745,000 | ) | (88,000 | ) | — | (833,000 | ) | |||||||||
$ | 3,694,983 | $ | 296,659 | $ | 318,361 | $ | 4,310,003 |
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Payday | Installment | Pawn & Title | Total | |||||||||||||
Current | $ | 3,683,603 | $ | 272,703 | $ | 284,460 | $ | 4,240,766 | ||||||||
1-30 | 253,297 | 44,433 | — | 297,730 | ||||||||||||
31-60 | 201,375 | 27,905 | — | 229,280 | ||||||||||||
61-90 | 185,072 | 18,747 | — | 203,819 | ||||||||||||
91-120 | 159,435 | 15,737 | — | 175,172 | ||||||||||||
121-150 | 176,625 | 8,889 | — | 185,514 | ||||||||||||
151-180 | 134,171 | 7,824 | — | 141,995 | ||||||||||||
4,793,578 | 396,238 | 284,460 | 5,474,276 | |||||||||||||
Less Allowance | (953,000 | ) | (83,000 | ) | — | (1,036,000 | ) | |||||||||
$ | 3,840,578 | $ | 313,238 | $ | 284,460 | $ | 4,438,276 |
5. Loans Receivable Allowance –
As a result of the Company’s Consumer Finance segment’s collection efforts, it historically writes off approximately 42% of the returned payday items, the most significant element making up loans receivable. Based on days past the check return date, write-offs of payday returned items historically have tracked at the following approximate percentages: 1 to 30 days – 42%; 31 to 60 days – 66%; 61 to 90 days – 84%; 91 to 120 days – 89%; and 121 to 150 – 92% and 151+ days – 93%.
F- 14
A rollforward of the Company’s loans receivable allowance for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Loans receivable allowance, beginning of year | $ | 1,036,000 | $ | 1,177,000 | ||||
Provision for loan losses charged to expense | 1,122,144 | 1,605,867 | ||||||
Charge-offs, net | (1,325,144 | ) | (1,746,867 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable allowance, end of year | $ | 833,000 | $ | 1,036,000 |
6. Accounts Receivable –
A breakdown of accounts receivables for continuing operations by segment are as follows:
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Cellular Retail | Direct to Consumer | Consumer Finance | Total | |||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | $ | 399,459 | $ | 365,476 | $ | 15,136 | $ | 780,071 | ||||||||
Less allowance | — | (16,000 | ) | — | (16,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Net account receivable | $ | 399,459 | $ | 349,476 | $ | 15,136 | $ | 764,071 |
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Cellular Retail | Direct to Consumer | Consumer Finance | Total | |||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | $ | 333,800 | $ | 363,426 | $ | 12,431 | $ | 709,657 | ||||||||
Less allowance | — | (13,000 | ) | — | (13,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Net account receivable | $ | 333,800 | $ | 350,426 | $ | 12,431 | $ | 696,657 |
7. Inventory –
Inventories consist of:
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
Finished Goods | ||||||||
Wireless Cellular | $ | 5,287,932 | $ | 5,059,521 | ||||
Direct to Consumer | $ | 2,988,052 | $ | 3,218,774 | ||||
Consumer Finance | $ | 854,858 | $ | 817,165 | ||||
TOTAL | $ | 9,130,842 | $ | 9,095,460 |
As a result of changes in the market for certain Company products and the resulting deteriorating value, carrying amounts for those inventories were reduced by approximately $576,000 and $507,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These inventory write-downs have been reflected in cost of goods sold in the statement of operations. Management believes that these reductions properly reflect inventory at lower of cost or market, and no additional losses will be incurred upon disposition.
F- 15
8. Property and Equipment –
A rollforward of the Company’s property and equipment is as follows:
December 31, 2016 | Acquisitions | Additions | Deletions | December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Property, equipment and sales floor | $ | 5,666,175 | $ | 1,170,000 | $ | 2,221,332 | $ | (350,510 | ) | $ | 8,706,997 | |||||||||
Software | 1,424,768 | — | 209,721 | — | 1,634,489 | |||||||||||||||
Building | 5,107,190 | — | 185,563 | — | 5,292,753 | |||||||||||||||
Land | 1,200,000 | — | — | — | 1,200,000 | |||||||||||||||
Other | 39,294 | — | — | — | 39,294 | |||||||||||||||
13,437,427 | 1,170,000 | 2,616,616 | (350,510 | ) | 16,873,533 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (4,028,193 | ) | — | (1,809,525 | ) | 311,419 | (5,526,299 | ) | ||||||||||||
$ | 9,409,234 | $ | 1,170,000 | $ | 807,091 | $ | (39,091 | ) | $ | 11,347,234 |
December 31, 2015 | Acquisitions | Additions | Deletions | December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Property, equipment and sales floor | $ | 3,971,088 | $ | 506,836 | $ | 1,742,209 | $ | (553,958 | ) | $ | 5,666,175 | |||||||||
Software | 1,268,156 | — | 156,612 | — | 1,424,768 | |||||||||||||||
Building (owned) | 5,148,703 | — | 44,393 | (85,906 | ) | 5,107,190 | ||||||||||||||
Land | 1,209,500 | — | — | (9,500 | ) | 1,200,000 | ||||||||||||||
Other | 61,766 | — | — | (22,472 | ) | 39,294 | ||||||||||||||
11,659,213 | 506,836 | 1,943,214 | (671,836 | ) | 13,437,427 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (3,478,832 | ) | — | (1,085,404 | ) | 536,043 | (4,028,193 | ) | ||||||||||||
$ | 8,180,381 | $ | 506,836 | $ | 857,810 | $ | (135,793 | ) | $ | 9,409,234 |
9. Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets –
During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company completed its annual goodwill impairment test of the Consumer Finance segment, resulting in an impairment charge of $7,559,063, or 100% of the goodwill in the Consumer Finance segment. There were several factors that contributed to this charge, including a voter-approved measure in the state of South Dakota that resulted in our cessation of operations in that state, the overall negative rates of growth of sales, profit and cash flows from our payday operations, lowered expectations for future performance and negative state and industry factors that upwardly effected the discount rates used in the current year valuation versus those used previously. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company also completed the annual impairment assessments for all other long-lived assets, determining there was no other impairment. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company completed the annual impairment assessments for goodwill and long-lived assets, determining there was no impairment.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2017, are as follows:
Wireless Retail Segment | Direct to Consumer Segment | Consumer Finance Segment | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill | 5,765,284 | 31,244 | 7,559,063 | 13,355,591 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated impairment losses | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Goodwill, net of impairment losses | 5,765,284 | 31,244 | 7,559,063 | 13,355,591 | ||||||||||||
2016 Activity: | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill acquired during year | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Impairment losses | — | — | (7,559,063 | ) | (7,559,063 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill | 5,765,284 | 31,244 | 7,559,063 | 13,355,591 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated impairment losses | — | — | (7,559,063 | ) | (7,559,063 | ) | ||||||||||
Goodwill, net of impairment losses | 5,765,284 | 31,244 | — | 5,796,528 | ||||||||||||
2017 Activity: | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill acquired during year | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Impairment losses | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill | 5,765,284 | 31,244 | 7,559,063 | 13,355,591 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated impairment losses | — | — | (7,559,063 | ) | (7,559,063 | ) | ||||||||||
Goodwill, net of impairment losses | $ | 5,765,284 | $ | 31,244 | $ | — | $ | 5,796,528 |
A rollforward of the Company’s intangible assets is as follows:
December 31, 2016 | Acquisitions | Additions | Deletions | December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 6,154,318 | $ | 4,227,108 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 10,381,426 | ||||||||||
Other | 227,000 | — | — | — | 227,000 | |||||||||||||||
Amortizable Intangible assets | 6,381,318 | 4,227,108 | — | — | 10,608,426 | |||||||||||||||
Less accumulated amortization | (5,085,759 | ) | — | (534,898 | ) | — | (5,620,657 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Amortizable Intangible Assets | 1,295,559 | 4,227,108 | (534,898 | ) | — | 4,987,769 | ||||||||||||||
Non-amortizable trademarks | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Intangible Assets, net | $ | 1,295,559 | $ | 4,227,108 | $ | (534,898 | ) | $ | — | $ | 4,987,769 |
F- 16
December 31, 2015 | Acquisitions | Additions | Deletions | December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 6,072,913 | $ | 81,405 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 6,154,318 | ||||||||||
Other | 227,000 | — | — | — | 227,000 | |||||||||||||||
Amortizable Intangible assets | 6,299,913 | 81,405 | — | — | 6,381,318 | |||||||||||||||
Less accumulated amortization | (4,867,157 | ) | — | (218,602 | ) | — | (5,085,759 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Amortizable Intangible Assets | 1,432,756 | 81,405 | (218,602 | ) | — | 1,295,559 | ||||||||||||||
Non-amortizable trademarks | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Intangible Assets, net | $ | 1,432,756 | $ | 81,405 | $ | (218,602 | ) | $ | — | $ | 1,295,559 |
As of December 31, 2017, estimated future amortization expense for the amortizable intangible assets is as follows:
2018 | $ | 796,817 | |||
2019 | 692,311 | ||||
2020 | 596,500 | ||||
2021 | 520,867 | ||||
2022 | 495,543 | ||||
Thereafter | 1,885,731 | ||||
$ | 4,987,769 |
10. Note Receivable –
The Company was party to a secured promissory note dated November 18, 2016 with the selling parties of 53 Cricket retail locations as further discussed in Note 18. The note provided for up to $4,000,000 of advances to selling parties, accrued interest at 8%, matured on the earlier of closing or November 18, 2017 and was secured by all of the property and assets of sellers. Advances and accrued interest pursuant to the secured promissory note agreement were credited against the amount owed to sellers at closing.
11. Deferred Revenue and Other Liabilities –
Deferred revenue and other liabilities consisted of the following:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Deferred financing fees | $ | 239,699 | $ | 264,174 | ||||
Merchandise credits and gift card liability | 833,901 | 907,362 | ||||||
Other | — | 2,124 | ||||||
Total | $ | 1,073,600 | $ | 1,173,660 |
12. Leases
The Company leases retail and office facilities under operating leases with terms ranging from month to month to six years, with rights to extend for additional periods. Rent expense, inclusive of base rents and common area maintenance obligations, insurance and real estate tax reimbursements, on all operations was approximately $10,100,000 and $6,410,000 in 2017 and 2016, respectively. Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands) are approximately as follows:
Year Ending December 31, | Operating Leases | ||||
2018 | $ | 7,105 | |||
2019 | 6,133 | ||||
2020 | 3,960 | ||||
2021 | 2,616 | ||||
2022 | 897 | ||||
Thereafter | 14 | ||||
Total minimum lease payments | $ | 20,725 |
F- 17
13. Notes Payable – Long Term –
The Company’s long-term debt is as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Revolving credit facility (with a credit limit of $3,000,000) to a financial institution with monthly payments of interest only at LIBOR plus 3.5% (4.875% at December 31, 2017), secured by substantially all assets of the Company with stated guarantee amounts by subsidiaries, maturing April 21, 2018. | — | 998,426 | ||||||
Note payable to a financial institution with monthly principal payment of $58,333 plus interest at LIBOR plus 3.5% (4.875% at December 31, 2017), secured by substantially all assets of the Company with stated guarantee amounts by subsidiaries, maturing April 21, 2021. All unpaid principal and interest was paid with proceeds from the sale of the Franchise segment as more fully disclosed in Note 19. | — | 3,091,667 | ||||||
Note payable to a financial institution with monthly principal payment of $56,667 plus interest at LIBOR plus 3.5% (4.875% at December 31, 2017), secured by substantially all assets of the Company with stated guarantee amounts by subsidiaries, maturing December 1, 2021. All unpaid principal and interest was paid with proceeds from the sale of the Franchise segment as more fully disclosed in Note 19. | — | 3,400,000 | ||||||
Subsidiary note payable to a financial institution with monthly principal payment of $33,334 plus annual paydowns equal to JPRE’s net cash flow from operations due within 120 days of the calendar year end plus interest at LIBOR plus 3.5% (4.875% at December 31, 2017), secured by JPRE assets, maturing June 5, 2019. All unpaid principal and interest was paid on October 12, 2017 | — | 2,971,452 | ||||||
Subsidiary subordinated note payable to seller with monthly interest only payments at 6%, guaranteed by PQH, maturing August 5, 2022 when the principal balance is due. | 789,216 | — | ||||||
Total | 789,216 | 10,461,545 | ||||||
Less current maturities | — | (1,780,000 | ) | |||||
$ | 789,216 | $ | 8,681,545 |
Future minimum long-term principal payments as of December 31, 2017 are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, | Amount | ||||
2018 | $ | — | |||
2019 | — | ||||
2020 | — | ||||
2021 | — | ||||
2022 | 789,216 | ||||
Thereafter | — | ||||
$ | 789,216 |
The Company is party to a Credit Agreement with a financial institution entered into on April 22, 2016 and subject to subsequent amendments. The Credit Agreement provides the Company with a revolving line of credit facility in an aggregate amount up to $3,000,000, having a maturity date of April 21, 2018 and an acquisition loan facility in an aggregate amount of up to $9,000,000, having a maturity date of April 21, 2018. The revolver and the acquisition loan facility bear interest at a floating per annum rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 3.50%, adjusted on a monthly basis. Funds advanced under the acquisition loan facility mature five years from the date of advance. At December 31, 2017, the entire $12,000,000 of credit was available under the credit facilities. See Note 21 for additional terms and conditions related to the Credit Agreement.
F- 18
14. Income Taxes –
The Company’s provision for income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations is as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
2017 | 2016 | ||||||||
Current: | |||||||||
Federal | $ | 390,000 | $ | 1,172,000 | |||||
State | (54,000 | ) | 98,000 | ||||||
336,000 | 1,270,000 | ||||||||
Deferred: | |||||||||
Federal | 331,000 | (1,755,000 | ) | ||||||
State | 64,000 | (360,000 | ) | ||||||
395,000 | (2,115,000 | ) | |||||||
$ | 731,000 | $ | (845,000 | ) |
Deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are summarized as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Allowance for accounts and loans receivable | $ | 220,000 | $ | 397,000 | ||||
Inventory capitalization | 64,000 | 98,000 | ||||||
Inventory reserve | 122,000 | 38,000 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | 115,000 | 117,000 | ||||||
Prepaid expense | (220,000 | ) | (429,000 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment | (730,000 | ) | (820,000 | ) | ||||
Goodwill and intangible assets | 565,000 | 1,117,000 | ||||||
Installment sale proceeds receivable | (1,592,000 | ) | — | |||||
Net deferred income tax asset (liability) | $ | (1,456,000 | ) | $ | 518,000 | |||
Reconciliations from the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective income tax rate for continuing operations are as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) using the statutory federal rate | $ | 817,000 | $ | (726,000 | ) | |||
State income taxes, net of federal benefit | (36,000 | ) | (184,000 | ) | ||||
ND meal and entertainment | 11,000 | 16,000 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest’s pass through income | (91,000 | ) | — | |||||
Tax relief act | 25,000 | — | ||||||
Transaction expenses | — | 18,000 | ||||||
Share based compensation | 9,000 | 18,000 | ||||||
Other | (4,000 | ) | 13,000 | |||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 731,000 | $ | (845,000 | ) |
The Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "Tax Reform Act") was enacted on December 22, 2017. This legislation makes significant changes in U.S. tax law including a reduction in corporate tax rates, changes to net operating loss carryforwards and carrybacks and a repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax. The legislation reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate from the current rate of 34% and 35% to 21%. As a result of the enacted law, the Company was required to revalue deferred tax assets and liabilities at the newly enacted rate. This revaluation resulted in an expense of $25,000 to income tax expense in continuing operations and a corresponding increase in the deferred tax liability. The other provisions of the Tax Reform Act did not have a material impact on the 2017 consolidated financial statements.
It is the Company’s practice to recognize penalties and/or interest related to income tax matters in interest and penalties expense. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had an immaterial amount of accrued interest and penalties.
F- 19
The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states and local jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require management to evaluate tax positions taken by the Company and recognize a tax liability (or asset) if the Company has taken an uncertain position that more likely than not would not be sustained upon examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Management has analyzed the tax positions taken by the Company and has concluded that as of December 31, 2017, there are no uncertain positions taken or expected to be taken that would require recognition of a liability (or asset) or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements. The Company is subject to routine audits by taxing jurisdictions. Currently the Company has no federal or state audits in progress. Management believes the Company is no longer subject to income tax examinations for years prior to 2014 for all entities with the exception of one subsidiary, which management believes is no longer subject to income tax examinations for years prior to 2013.
15. Equity –
Reincorporation
On January 20, 2016, our shareholders approved a plan to reincorporate Western Capital Resources, Inc. in Delaware at a special meeting of the shareholders called for that purpose. The reincorporation was completed on May 11, 2016.
WCR 2015 Stock Incentive Plan
On February 2, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company approved and adopted the Company’s 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, pursuant to which an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance. Effective February 6, 2015, the Board of Directors terminated the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan and adopted the Company’s new 2015 Stock Incentive Plan. There were no incentives issued or outstanding under the terminated plan. As of December 31, 2017 65,000 options had been granted under the 2015 plan.
The Board of Directors, or a committee of the board, administers the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan and has complete authority to award incentives, to interpret the plan and to make any other determination which it believes necessary and advisable for the proper administration of the plan. A total of 100,000 shares of common stock were reserved in connection with the adoption of the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan.
The 2015 Stock Incentive plan permits the granting of incentives in any one or a combination of the following forms:
● | stock options, including options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as “qualified” or “incentive” stock options; | |
● | stock appreciation rights (often referred to as “SARs”) payable in shares of common stock; | |
● | restricted stock and restricted stock units; | |
● | performance awards of cash, stock or property; and | |
● | stock awards. |
The following table summarizes nonvested stock option awards outstanding at December 31, 2017 and the changes for the year then ended:
Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share | Weighted-Average (in years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding and nonvested at December 31, 2016 | 43,000 | $ | 6.00 | $ | — | |||||||||||
Granted | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Vested | 43,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||
Forfeited | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Outstanding and nonvested at December 31, 2017 | — | $ | 6.00 | — | ||||||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2017 | 65,000 |
F- 20
The options vest in three annual and near-equal installments on each of February 8, 2016, 2017 and 2018, and has a contract life of ten years. Options scheduled to vest in 2018 were accelerated and vested in 2017. There were 65,000 vested options at December 31, 2017. The strike price exceeded the share value at December 31, 2017 and thus there was no intrinsic value in outstanding vested options at December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, there was no unrecognized stock-based compensation expense.
Noncontrolling Interests
The subsidiary PQH owns 70% of its subsidiary PQH South LLC. For financial interests in which the Company owns a controlling financial interest, the Company applies the provisions of ASC 810, which are applicable to reporting the equity and net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interests.
16. Dividends –
Our Board of Directors declared the following dividends payable in 2017:
Date Declared | Record Date | Dividend Per Share | Payment Date |
February 24, 2017 | March 17, 2017 | $0.025 | March 24, 2017 |
May 12, 2017 | July 14, 2017 | $0.025 | July 24, 2017 |
August 28, 2017 | September 18, 2017 | $0.025 | September 29, 2017 |
November 13, 2017 | December 1, 2017 | $0.025 | December 8, 2017 |
17. Other Expenses –
A breakout of other expense is as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Bank fees | $ | 2,057,187 | $ | 1,739,766 | ||||
Collection costs | 367,039 | 397,312 | ||||||
Insurance | 884,477 | 635,861 | ||||||
Management and advisory fees | 741,624 | 763,630 | ||||||
Professional and consulting fees | 2,354,455 | 1,658,242 | ||||||
Supplies | 1,339,756 | 852,258 | ||||||
Other | 2,737,092 | 2,237,250 | ||||||
$ | 10,481,630 | $ | 8,284,319 |
18. Acquisitions –
Cellular Retail Growth
In 2016, PQH entered into an agreement to acquire 20 Cricket Wireless retail locations, with an option to purchase an additional 33 locations. The aggregate purchase price for all 53 locations was approximately $6,000,000, subject to reduction in the event that the seller exercised an option to retain a 30% ownership in the acquired business. From November 22, 2016 through June 30, 2017, PQH operated the store locations under a management agreement. Effective July 1, 2017, we consummated the acquisition transaction by acquiring a 70% interest in all 53 locations through a subsidiary of PQH, and the seller, upon exercising its option to retain a 30% ownership interest in the acquired business, contributed its interest to the subsidiary. The final purchase price for 100% of the equity was $5.7 million. As a result, PQH owns 70% of the newly formed subsidiary and the seller owns the remaining 30% of that subsidiary. Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the purchase date as follows:
July 1, 2017 | ||||
Inventory | $ | 217,000 | ||
Property and equipment | 1,170,000 | |||
Intangible assets | 4,227,000 | |||
Other assets | 103,000 | |||
Liability assumed | (22,000 | ) | ||
$ | 5,695,000 |
F- 21
19. Discontinued Operations –
On October 2, 2017, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Agreement”) with U.S. Business Holdings, Inc. (the “Purchaser”), MBE WorldWide S.p.A. (as guarantor for the Purchaser), BC Alpha, LLC (“BCA”, a wholly owned subsidiary of BC Alpha Holdings II, LLC), and BC Alpha Holdings II, LLC (“BCAH”, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company). Pursuant to the Agreement, BCA sold all of its shares of capital stock of AGI to the Purchaser. This sale, which closed on October 3, 2017, constitutes the sale of the Company’s franchise segment. The cash purchase price paid by the Purchaser pursuant to the Agreement was $61,500,000, subject to post-closing working capital adjustments. BCA, BCAH, the Company and the Purchaser also agreed to make a joint election under Section 338(h)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code, which treats the transaction as an asset purchase for tax purposes subject to satisfaction of applicable legal requirements.
Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company, BCA and BCAH made customary representations and warranties regarding AGI and its business, and agreed to certain covenants, including customary non-compete and non-solicit covenants related to the AGI business for a period of three years from the closing date. In addition, the Agreement requires the Company to indemnify the Purchaser for damages resulting from or arising out of any inaccuracy or breach of any representation, warranty or covenant of the Company, BCA or BCAH in the Agreement and for certain other matters. The Company’s indemnification obligations generally survive for 24 months following the closing. The Company’s maximum aggregate liability for indemnification claims for any such inaccuracies or breaches is generally limited to an indemnification escrow of $6,500,000, 50% of which (less any indemnification claims) is to be disbursed 12 months following the closing, with the remaining balance (less any indemnification claims) to be disbursed 24 months following the closing.
As a result of the transaction, the Company received approximately $49,000,000 in proceeds from the sale, after taking into account the impact of the estimated working capital and similar purchase price adjustments, the escrowing of $6,500,000 of sale proceeds, the payoff of the Company’s current balance on its Fifth Third acquisition credit facility of approximately $4,300,000, and the payoff of an aggregate amount of approximately $1,600,000 in transaction costs and pre-closing AGI liabilities related to the cancellation and redemption of securities at the AGI level that occurred prior to the transaction.
In connection with the transaction, the Company also entered into a Consent and Third Loan Modification Agreement (the “Modification Agreement”) with Fifth Third Bank, as lender (“Fifth Third”), which amended that certain Credit Agreement between the Company and Fifth Third, dated April 22, 2016, as amended (the “Credit Agreement”) to (i) release Fifth Third’s liens on the assets of AGI, BCA and BCAH, (ii) remove AGI, BCA and BCAH as guarantors of the Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement, and (iii) release Fifth Third’s lien on the Company’s equity interests in BCAH.
In accordance with the provisions of ASC 205-20, the Company has separately reported the assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations of the Franchise segment in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The assets and liabilities have been reflected as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and consist of the following:
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
OTHER CURRENT ASSETS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | $ | — | $ | 1,020,210 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other | — | 327,851 | ||||||
TOTAL OTHER CURRENT ASSETS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | $ | — | $ | 1,348,061 | ||||
NONCURRENT ASSETS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: | ||||||||
Property and equipment, net | $ | — | $ | 287,386 | ||||
Intangible assets, net | — | 6,241,386 | ||||||
Other | — | 121,119 | ||||||
TOTAL NONCURRENT ASSETS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | $ | — | $ | 6,649,891 | ||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | — | $ | 1,375,754 | ||||
Other liabilities | — | 1,044,061 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | — | 170,262 | ||||||
Current portion capital lease obligations | — | 7,620 | ||||||
Deferred revenue and other | — | 253,698 | ||||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | $ | — | $ | 2,851,395 | ||||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes | $ | — | $ | 2,293,000 | ||||
Other | — | 143,080 | ||||||
TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | $ | — | $ | 2,436,080 |
F- 22
In accordance with the provisions of ASC 205-20, the Company has not included in the results of continuing operations the results of operations of the discontinued operations of the Franchise segment in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The results of operations for this business for the period ended October 2, 2017 and year ended December 31, 2016 have been reflected as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and consist of the following:
Period Ended | ||||||||
October 2, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
REVENUES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | $ | 12,382,543 | $ | 15,193,793 | ||||
COST OF REVENUES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | 2,116,451 | 2,508,421 | ||||||
GROSS PROFIT OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | 10,266,092 | 12,685,372 | ||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: | ||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits | 3,769,655 | 4,408,094 | ||||||
Occupancy | 141,847 | 239,699 | ||||||
Advertising, marketing and development | 441,542 | 364,813 | ||||||
Depreciation | 74,837 | 111,149 | ||||||
Amortization | 260,208 | 344,474 | ||||||
Other | 2,361,868 | 2,523,893 | ||||||
7,049,957 | 7,992,122 | |||||||
OPERATING INCOME OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | 3,216,135 | 4,693,250 | ||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | ||||||||
Interest expense | (195,087 | ) | (217,516 | ) | ||||
Gain on sale | 56,699,018 | — | ||||||
56,503,931 | (217,516 | ) | ||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | 59,720,066 | 4,475,734 | ||||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | 23,415,000 | 1,709,000 | ||||||
NET INCOME OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | 36,305,066 | 2,766,734 | ||||||
Less net income of discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests | (12,815 | ) | (20,390 | ) | ||||
NET INCOME OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS ATTRIBUTABLE TO WESTERN COMMON SHAREHOLDERS | $ | 36,292,251 | $ | 2,746,344 |
F- 23
In accordance with the provisions of ASC 205-20, the Company has separately reported the cash flow activity of the discontinued operations of the Franchise segment in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The cash flow activity from discontinued operations for the period ended October 2, 2017 and year ended December 31, 2016 have been reflected as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and consist of the following:
Period Ended | ||||||||
October 2, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
DISCONTINUED OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Net income of discontinued operations | $ | 1,838,109 | $ | 2,766,734 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income of discontinued operations to net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations: | ||||||||
Depreciation | 74,837 | 111,149 | ||||||
Amortization | 260,207 | 344,474 | ||||||
Share based compensation | 6,730 | 950 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (138,000 | ) | 7,000 | |||||
Contract termination | 893,086 | — | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | (391,691 | ) | 129,236 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 30,755 | 186,867 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (458,596 | ) | (114,629 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue and other current liabilities | (335,525 | ) | (434,893 | ) | ||||
Other liabilities – long-term | 65,844 | 62,677 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations | 1,845,756 | 3,059,565 | ||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | ||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment | (30,024 | ) | (17,594 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of stock of discontinued operations | 48,282,714 | — | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of discontinued operations | 48,252,690 | (17,594 | ) | |||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | ||||||||
Payments on notes payable – long-term | — | (1,625,000 | ) | |||||
Principal payments on capital lease obligations | (7,620 | ) | (23,861 | ) | ||||
Payments from (dividends to) shareholders | (4,399,422 | ) | 8,076 | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities of discontinued operations | (4,407,042 | ) | (1,640,785 | ) |
20. Segment Information –
The Company has grouped its continuing operations into four segments – Cellular Retail, Direct to Consumer, Consumer Finance and Corporate. The Cellular Retail segment is a dealer for Cricket Wireless selling cellular phones and accessories, ancillary services and serving as a payment center for customers. The “Direct to Consumer” segment, which consists of an online and direct marketing distribution retailer with product offerings including seeds, live goods and garden accessories operating in the retail market under Park Seed, Jackson & Perkins and Wayside Gardens, and in the wholesale market under Park Wholesale, and an online retail seller of home improvement and restoration products operating over the internet through the domain name of www.Vandykes.com and through direct mail catalogs. The Consumer Finance segment provides financial and ancillary services. The Corporate segment includes the parent company activities, inclusive of the acquisitions department and management of acquired subsidiaries.
Segment information related to the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
December 31, 2017 (in thousands)
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Cellular | Direct to Consumer | Consumer Finance | Corporate | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue from external customers | $ | 69,547 | $ | 40,993 | $ | 10,981 | $ | — | $ | 121,521 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | $ | 1,811 | $ | 453 | $ | 64 | $ | 16 | $ | 2,344 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | $ | 171 | $ | 132 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 303 | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | (410 | ) | $ | 667 | $ | 987 | $ | (513 | ) | $ | 731 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (57 | ) | $ | 1,837 | $ | 779 | $ | (886 | ) | $ | 1,673 | ||||||||
Total segment assets | $ | 28,337 | $ | 14,357 | $ | 7,523 | $ | 54,027 | $ | 104,244 | ||||||||||
Expenditures for segmented assets | $ | 7,915 | $ | 414 | $ | 1 | $ | 8 | $ | 8,338 |
F- 24
December 31, 2016 (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cellular | Direct to Consumer | Consumer Finance | Corporate | Discontinued Operations | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue from external customers | $ | 39,236 | $ | 42,914 | $ | 11,843 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 93,993 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | $ | 786 | $ | 428 | $ | 90 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,304 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | $ | 161 | $ | 149 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 310 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 483 | $ | 1,197 | $ | (2,027 | ) | $ | (498 | ) | $ | — | $ | (845 | ) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 717 | $ | 2,245 | $ | (3,318 | ) | $ | (932 | ) | $ | — | $ | (1,288 | ) | |||||||||
Total segment assets | $ | 23,683 | $ | 16,863 | $ | 8,471 | $ | 390 | $ | 11,322 | $ | 60,729 | ||||||||||||
Expenditures for segmented assets | $ | 2,292 | $ | 193 | $ | 46 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,531 |
21. Commitments and Contingencies –
Employment Agreements
The Company is party to an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer, Mr. John Quandahl. The agreement runs from April 1, 2016 through March 2019. The agreement provides an annual base salary, eligibility for an annual performance-based cash bonus pool for management and contains customary non-solicitation and non-competition provisions as well as provisions for severance payments upon termination by the Company without cause or upon termination by Mr. Quandahl with good reason.
The Company is party to an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective August 16, 2017 with its Chief Financial Officer / Chief Investment Officer, Mr. Angel Donchev. The agreement provides an annual base salary, eligibility for a discretionary annual performance-based bonus up to $135,000 and contains provisions for severance payments upon termination by the Company without cause.
The Company has also entered into several employment agreements with certain members of subsidiary management. The terms of each agreement are different. However, one or all of these agreements include stipulated base salary and bonus potential. The agreement also contains customary non-solicitation and non-competition provisions as well as provisions for severance payments upon termination by the Company without cause.
Pursuant to the numerous employment agreements, bonuses of approximately $348,000 and $785,000 were accrued for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Credit Facility
The Company is party to a Credit Agreement with a financial institution. Certain Company subsidiaries are guarantors of the borrowings and obligations under the Credit Agreement. All borrowings under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all assets of WCR and the guarantor subsidiaries.
The Credit Agreement requires WCR to meet certain financial tests, including a leverage ratio and a fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement. Subject to certain exceptions, the Credit Agreement contains covenants limiting the Company’s ability to (or to permit the guarantor subsidiaries to) merge or consolidate with, or engage in a sale of substantially all assets to, any party, but WCR or any guarantor subsidiary generally may nonetheless merge with another party if (i) WCR or guarantor subsidiary is the entity surviving such merger, and (ii) immediately after giving effect to such merger, no default shall have occurred and be continuing under the Credit Agreement. Subject to certain exceptions, the Credit Agreement also contains covenants limiting WCR’s ability to (or to permit the guarantor subsidiaries to) create liens on assets, incur additional indebtedness, make certain types of investments, and pay dividends or make certain other types of restricted payments, but WCR may nonetheless pay dividends to its shareholders if (a) there are no outstanding loans or unpaid interest under the revolving credit facility, and (b) no default shall have occurred and be continuing under the Credit Agreement. Some covenant waivers were granted by the financial institution during the period ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
F- 25
Legal Proceedings
The Company is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. The Company does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results.
22. Management and Advisory Agreement
The Company is party to a Second Amended and Restated Management and Advisory Agreement dated November 1, 2017 with Blackstreet Capital Management, LLC, (“Blackstreet”) under which Blackstreet provides certain financial, managerial, strategic and operating advice and assistance to the Company.
The agreement requires the Company to pay Blackstreet a fee in an amount equal to $400,000 upon the closing of an acquisition in consideration for Blackstreet’s referral to the Company of such acquisition opportunity, and Blackstreet’s assistance in the performance of due diligence services relating thereto.
The annual fees under the agreement will be the greater of (i) $674,840 (subject to annual increases of five percent) or (ii) five percent of Western Capital’s “EBITDA” as defined under the agreement. All other annual fee terms and provisions remain unmodified.
Finally, the agreement may only be terminated by mutual consent of the parties. Upon any termination, the Company shall pay a termination fee equal to three times the previous 12-month annual fee.
The annual management and advisory fees related to the management and advisory agreement with Blackstreet for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $641,624 and $705,630, respectively.
23. Special Committee of the Board of Directors –
The Board of Directors has appointed Mr. Ellery Roberts to various special committees of the board. Annual Director and special committee fees expense was $38,000 and $30,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
24. Related Party Transactions –
Leases
The Company leases three properties from an officer of the Company and another party under operating leases, one that is month-to-month, requiring monthly lease payments of $1,680, one that extends through June 2020, requiring monthly lease payments of $1,200, and one that is month-to-month, requiring monthly lease payments of $5,000. In October 2012, the Company entered into the latter lease. The lease is for a term of five years and has monthly base rental payments of $5,000 per month. The lease is at terms substantially similar to other leases for property near that location. The lease transaction was approved by the Board of Directors and the related party abstained from voting. This property is used for a Cricket retail storefront.
On August 31, 2011, the Company entered into two operating leases for property owned by Ladary, LLC. Ladary, which acquired the two properties in foreclosure sales, is partially owned by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, two current or past directors and one employee of the management company that manages the Company’s largest shareholder. The leases, one of which replaced an earlier lease that the Company had entered into with the prior landlord, have four-year terms, require aggregate monthly rental payments of $6,300, and are on terms and conditions substantially similar to those contained in the replaced leases.
Annual rent expense to related parties for the five retail locations for 2017 and 2016 was approximately $170,000 per year.
F- 26
25. Subsequent Events –
Dividend
Our Board of Directors declared the following dividends payable in 2018:
Date Declared | Record Date | Dividend Per Share | Payment Date |
January 18, 2018 | February 9, 2018 | $0.05 | February 14, 2018 |
Cellular Retail Store Exchange
In February 2018, the Company transferred 28 Cricket Wireless retail locations to another Cricket Wireless dealer in exchange for 15 Cricket Wireless retail locations.
F- 27
ITEM 9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Effective on August 2, 2017, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved the appointment of Sadler Gibb & Associates, LLC to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. KLJ & Associates, LLP (“KLJ”), the Company’s former independent registered public accounting firm, notified the Company on July 29, 2017 that it was resigning as the Company’s independent public accounting firm effective that date. Incorporated herein by reference is Item 4.01 from the Current Report on Form 8-K, including the letter of KLJ filed as Exhibit 16.1 thereto, filed by the Company with the Commission on August 3, 2017. There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosures requiring disclosure pursuant to Item 304(b) of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 9A | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance the objectives of the control system are met.
We utilize the Committee of Sponsoring Organization’s Internal Control – Integrated Framework, 2013 version, for the design, implementation and assessment of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
As of December 31, 2017, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2017.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a set of processes designed by, or under the supervision of, a company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:
● | pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets; |
● | provide reasonable assurance our transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and |
● | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statement. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. It should be noted that any system of internal control, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be met. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
29
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company’s management assessed the design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 based on the framework set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017. Sadler, Gibb & and Associates, LLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, is not required to issue, and thus has not issued, an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal year covered by this report that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect such controls.
None.
30
ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MANAGEMENT
Our Board of Directors consists of Richard E. Miller, Ellery Roberts, Kevin Kuby, Jonathan Tipton, and John Quandahl. The following table sets forth the name and position of each of our current directors and executive officers.
Name | Age | Positions | ||
John Quandahl | 51 | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Director | ||
Steve Irlbeck | 53 | Secretary | ||
Angel Donchev | 36 | Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer | ||
Ellery Roberts | 47 | Director | ||
Richard Miller | 71 | Director | ||
Kevin Kuby | 49 | Director | ||
Jonathan Tipton | 35 | Director |
The biographies of the above-identified individuals are set forth below:
John Quandahl, the Company’s Chief Executive and Operating Officer, currently also serves as the President of Wyoming Financial Lenders, Inc., a position he has held since 2007. Mr. Quandahl served as the Company’s Interim Chief Financial Officer from January 1, 2008 to May 10, 2011. From 2005 until joining Wyoming Financial Lenders, Mr. Quandahl was the President of Houlton Enterprises, Inc., and prior to that served as that corporation’s Chief Operating Officer from 1999 until 2004. During his tenure at Wyoming Financial Lenders and Houlton Enterprises, Mr. Quandahl and the respective employers were based in Omaha, Nebraska. Mr. Quandahl was the controller at Silverstone Group, Inc., from 1993 until 1998, and before that began his career at the Nebraska Department of Revenue as a tax auditor in 1989. Mr. Quandahl is a certified public accountant (inactive) and earned a degree in accounting from the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Mr. Quandahl served as Chief Operating Officer of Wyoming Financial Lenders prior to its merger with the Company has continued to serve as our Chief Operating Officer since that time. Effective January 1, 2009, Mr. Quandahl was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer and until May 2011, our interim Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Quandahl was appointed to the Board of Directors on March 9, 2009.
Steve Irlbeck was appointed the Company’s Secretary on August 16, 2017, served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer from May 2011 until August 16, 2017 and is Chief Financial Officer of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries. Mr. Irlbeck joined the Company in January 2009 as the Company’s Senior Director of Accounting. From 1995 until 2008, Mr. Irlbeck was employed at Lutz & Company, PC, a public accounting and consulting firm in Omaha, Nebraska where he was a tax partner. Mr. Irlbeck is a certified public accountant (inactive) and earned a degree in accounting from Creighton University.
Angel Donchev was appointed the Company’s Chief Financial Officer on August 16, 2017. He joined the Company as its Chief Investment Officer in February 2015 and continues to hold that position. From 2005 until February 2015, Mr. Donchev was employed by Blackstreet Capital Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company principally engaged in the management of private investments. Prior to Blackstreet, Mr. Donchev worked as a generalist in the Corporate Finance division of Stephens Inc., a middle market investment bank. Mr. Donchev served as a director of AlphaGraphics, Inc. from February 2012 until the sale in October 2017. Mr. Donchev was previously a director of the Company from March 31, 2010 until he resigned on October 1, 2014. Mr. Donchev has been involved in control buyouts of lower middle market companies with combined revenues in excess of $700 million over the past 15 years. Mr. Donchev is a Harvard Business School alumnus and has a BBA in Business Honors and Finance from the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin.
Richard Miller is an independent business consultant. Previously, Mr. Miller was Chief Executive Officer of Pirelli Tire North America, a $120 million tire manufacturer, and Chief Executive Officer of Dunn Tire Corporation, a $25 million regional tire retailer. Prior experience also includes senior operating positions with Dunlop Tire. Mr. Miller has served as Executive Chairman of True Home Value, Inc., and currently serves as Chairman of Swisher, Inc. ― a private company to which Blackstreet Capital Management, LLC provides management and advisory services. Mr. Miller is a decorated former Marine Captain and holds a BA from Chapman College in California. Mr. Miller previously served as our Chairman of the Board.
31
Ellery Roberts was appointed by the Board of Directors to serve as a director on May 10, 2010. Mr. Roberts brings over 20 years of private equity investing experience to our company. Mr. Roberts has been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of 1847 Holdings LLC since its inception on January 22, 2013. Prior to the formation of 1847 Holdings LLC, Mr. Roberts served as the managing member of The 1847 Companies LLC, a buyer and operator of two lower-middle market businesses recapitalized in 2012. Prior to The 1847 Companies, LLC, Mr. Roberts was the co-founder and was co-managing principal from October 2009 to June 2011 of RW Capital Partners LLC, the recipient of a “Green Light” letter from the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). Mr. Roberts was a founding member of Parallel Investment Partners, LP (formerly SKM Growth Investors, LP), or Parallel, a Dallas-based private equity fund focused on re-capitalizations, buyouts and growth capital investments in lower middle market companies throughout the United States. During his tenure at Parallel, Mr. Roberts held the position of Managing Director from January 2004 to September 2009, Vice President from January 2003 to December 2003 and Senior Associate from January 2000 to December 2002. Mr. Roberts was responsible for approximately $400 million in invested capital across two funds. Also during his tenure with Parallel, Mr. Roberts sat on the boards of Environmental Lighting Concepts, Hat World Corporation, Senex Financial Corporation, Builders TradeSource Corporation, Action Sports, Weisman Discount Home Centers, Winnercom, Mealey’s Furniture, Regional Management Corporation, Marmalade Cafes, and Diesel Service and Supply (all of which are private companies). Prior to Parallel, Mr. Roberts was a Vice President with Lazard Group LLC (NYSE: LAZ), or Lazard, from July 1997 to December 2000. While at Lazard, he focused on and also gained experience in the home building, health care, retail, industrial and lodging sectors. Prior to joining Lazard in 1997, Mr. Roberts was a Senior Financial Analyst with Colony Capital, Inc. from July 1995 to June 1996, where he analyzed and executed transactions for Colony Investors II, L.P., a $625 million private equity fund. Prior to that, he was a Financial Analyst with the Corporate Finance Division of Smith Barney Inc. (now known as Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC) from January 1994 to June 1995 where he participated in a wide variety of investment banking activities. During his career Mr. Roberts has been directly involved with over $3.0 billion in direct private equity investments. Mr. Roberts received his B.A. degree in English from Stanford University.
Kevin Kuby was appointed to the Board of Directors on July 1, 2015 at the direction of BC Alpha Holdings I, consistent with certain director-appointment rights granted to that company in the AlphaGraphics Merger Agreement. Mr. Kuby serves as the Managing Director of Restructuring for Blackstreet Capital Management, LLC and Executive Vice President - Restructuring of Blackstreet Capital Holdings, LLC. Prior to joining Western Capital’s board, Mr. Kuby previously worked for Alvarez & Marsal, FTI Consulting and for PricewaterhouseCoopers in their business restructuring practices. Currently, Mr. Kuby sits on the Board of Directors of AWE, ThinkDirect Marketing Group, Jerry’s Subs and Pizza and IMarketing. Mr. Kuby received an MBA from the University of Chicago and a B.A. in Economics from the University of Illinois – Urbana / Champaign.
Jonathan Tipton was appointed to the Board of Directors on November 20, 2017 at the direction of BC Alpha Holdings I. Mr. Tipton was a Senior Vice President - Investments at Blackstreet Capital Management, LLC, Blackstreet Capital Holdings, LLC, and Black Bear Sports Group, Inc. Mr. Tipton previously worked as an analyst in the corporate finance division of Stephens Inc., a middle-market investment bank, where he gained experience in leveraged buyouts, M&A and public offering transactions in a variety of industries. Mr. Tipton graduated summa cum laude from Rhodes College and received an MBA from INSEAD. Mr. Tipton also serves on the Board of Directors of AWE Acquisition, Inc., and on the Board of Managers of iMarketing Acquisition, LLC.
Under our corporate bylaws, all of our directors serve for terms expiring upon the next annual meeting of our shareholders.
When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills to enable the Board of Directors to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’s business and structure, the Board of Directors focuses primarily on the industry and transactional experience, and other background, in addition to any unique skills or attributes associated with a director. With regard to Mr. Quandahl, the Board of Directors considered his significant experience, expertise and background with regard to accounting, financial and tax matters, his particular experience with the payday lending industry as well as retail operations, and his demonstrated experience and skills in managing and evaluating the coordination and integration of the Company’s two principal operating segments. With regard to Mr. Miller, the Board of Directors considered his leadership experience as well as his background and experience in retail operations. With regards to Mr. Roberts, the Board of Directors considered his extensive experience in finance and capital structures, his prior board leadership experience as well as his prior experience in retail operations. With regards to Mr. Kuby, the Board of Directors considered his diverse board experience and his restructuring knowledge and experience. With regards to Mr. Tipton, the Board of Directors considered his vast industry knowledge and experience as an analyst.
FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS
The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that there are no familial relationships among any of our officers or directors.
32
INVOLVEMENT IN CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
During the past ten years, no officer, director, control person or promoter of the Company has been:
● | involved in any petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law that was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years within the date of this report; |
● | convicted in a criminal proceeding or named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); |
● | the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities: (1) acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity; (2) engaging in any type of business practice; or (3) engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of federal or state securities laws or federal commodities laws; |
● | the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any federal or state authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity; |
● | found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC to have violated any federal or state securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the SEC has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated; |
● | found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated; |
● | the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of: (1) any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation; or (2) any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or (3) any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or |
● | the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member. |
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
The Board of Directors has determined that at least one member of the Audit Committee, Mr. Ellery Roberts, is an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined in Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act. Mr. Robert’s relevant experience is detailed in Item 10 above. As noted above, Mr. Roberts qualifies as an “independent director,” as such term is defined in Section 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq listing rules, and meets the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the Audit Committee members is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements and that at least one member of the Audit Committee has past employment experience in finance or accounting.
33
CODE OF ETHICS
We have adopted a Code of Ethics that governs the conduct of our officers, directors and employees in order to promote honesty, integrity, loyalty and the accuracy of our financial statements. Our Code of Ethics was amended and restated effective as of September 13, 2017, and a copy of that amended and restated Code of Ethics is filed as an exhibit to this report. You may obtain a copy of the Code of Ethics without charge by writing us and requesting a copy, attention: John Quandahl, 11550 “I” Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68137. You may also request a copy by calling us at (402) 551-8888.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers, directors and persons considered to be beneficial owners of more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and Nasdaq. Officers, directors and greater-than-ten-percent shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms furnished to us by our officers and directors and by WCR, LLC and BC Alpha Holdings I, LLC, we believe that all such filings were filed on a timely basis for fiscal year 2017.
ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation awarded to or earned by: (i) each individual who served as the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Western Capital during the year ended December 31, 2017; and (ii) each other individual that served as an executive officer of Western Capital at the conclusion of the year ended December 31, 2017 and who received more than $100,000 in the form of salary and bonus during such fiscal year. For purposes of this report, these individuals are collectively referred to as our “named executives.”
Name and Principal Position | Salary | Bonus | Total | |||||||||||||
John Quandahl (1) | 2017 | $ | 300,000 | $ | — | $ | 300,000 | |||||||||
Pres. and Chief Executive Officer | 2016 | $ | 286,500 | $ | 87,750 | $ | 374,250 | |||||||||
Angel Donchev (2) | 2017 | $ | 259,375 | $ | 175,625 | $ | 435,000 | |||||||||
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer | 2016 | $ | 235,000 | $ | 180,000 | $ | 415,000 | |||||||||
Steve Irlbeck (3) | 2017 | $ | 225,000 | $ | 45,000 | $ | 270,000 | |||||||||
Secretary | 2016 | $ | 225,000 | $ | 87,750 | $ | 312,750 |
(1) | Mr. Quandahl is our President and Chief Executive Officer (appointed January 1, 2009) and our Chief Operating Officer (appointed November 29, 2007). |
(2) | Mr. Donchev serves as our Chief Financial Officer (appointed on August 16, 2017) and Chief Investment Officer (appointed February 2015). |
(3) | Mr. Irlbeck currently serves as our Secretary (appointed August 16, 2017) and as Chief Financial Officer of certain subsidiaries. Mr. Irlbeck served as our Chief Financial Officer from May 10, 2011 to August 16, 2017. |
EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL AGREEMENTS
We do not currently have change-in-control agreements with any named executives or any other current members of our executive management.
Western Capital entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Angel Donchev, effective as of August 16, 2017, under which Mr. Donchev became the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Donchev retained his current title and responsibilities as the Company’s Chief Investment Officer, a position he has held since February 2015. Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, Mr. Donchev will be paid an annual base salary of $300,000 and will be eligible to receive an annual performance-based cash bonus targeted to an amount of $135,000. In addition, Western Capital has agreed to accelerate the vesting of an issued and outstanding stock option held by Mr. Donchev, entitling him to purchase up to 65,000 shares of common stock at the per-share price of $6.00 through March 31, 2025. The Amended and Restated Employment Agreement contains other customary provisions, including a non-disclosure covenant binding Mr. Donchev, and a Company obligation to pay Mr. Donchev 12 months of base salary, as severance, in the event that the Company were to terminate Mr. Donchev’s employment without cause.
34
Effective April 1, 2016, we entered into a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. John Quandahl. The agreement has a term of three years and contains other terms and conditions that are similar to those of the original agreement which had expired. Specifically, the amended and restated agreement provides an annual base salary and eligibility for an annual performance-based cash bonus pool for management. The amended and restated agreement also contains customary non-solicitation and non-competition provisions as well as provisions for severance payments upon termination by the Company without cause or upon termination by Mr. Quandahl with good reason.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Name and Principal Position | Compensation | Other Annual Compensation | Total | ||||||||||||
Lawrence Berger (1) | 2017 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Chairman | 2016 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Richard Miller (2) | 2017 | $ | — | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | ||||||||
Director | 2016 | $ | — | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | ||||||||
Ellery Roberts (3) | 2017 | $ | 38,000 | $ | — | $ | 38,000 | ||||||||
Director | 2016 | $ | 30,000 | $ | — | $ | 30,000 | ||||||||
Kevin Kuby (4) | 2017 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Director | 2016 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Jonathan Tipton (5) | 2017 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Director | 2016 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
(1) | Mr. Berger was appointed to the Board of Directors effective October 1, 2014, serving as its Chairman until his resignation effective November 16, 2017. |
(2) | Mr. Miller provides management consulting services to the Company in addition to his services as a director of the Board. In accordance with the consulting agreement, his compensation is $100,000 per year. |
(3) | Mr. Roberts served on a special committee of the Board of Directors. In connection with this service, the Board of Directors approved the payment of compensation. |
(4) | Mr. Kuby was appointed to the Board of Directors effective July 1, 2015. |
(5) | Mr. Tipton was appointed to the Board of Directors effective November 20, 2017. |
ITEM 12 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
As of the close of business on March 29, 2018, we had outstanding 9,390,997 shares of common stock. Each share of capital stock is currently entitled to one vote on all matters put to a vote of our shareholders. The following table sets forth the number of common shares, and percentage of outstanding common shares, beneficially owned as of March 29, 2018, by:
● | each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Company’s outstanding common stock |
● | each current director |
● | each executive officer of the Company and other persons identified as a named executive in ITEM 11 above, and |
● | all current executive officers and directors as a group. |
35
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the following persons is 11550 “I” Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68137, and each such person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite his, her or its name.
Name and Address | Common Shares Beneficially Owned (1) |
Percentage of Common Shares (1) |
|||||
Richard Miller | 84,166 | * | % | ||||
Ellery Roberts | — | — | % | ||||
Lawrence Berger (2) | 33,985 | * | % | ||||
Kevin Kuby | — | — | % | ||||
Jonathan Tipton | 13,779 | * | % | ||||
John Quandahl | 30,000 | * | % | ||||
Steve Irlbeck | 10,000 | * | % | ||||
Angel Donchev | 15,273 | * | % | ||||
All current executive officers and directors as a group (3) | 187,203 | 1.99 | % | ||||
WCR, LLC (4) | 4,117,510 | 43.85 | % | ||||
c/o Blackstreet Capital Management, LLC | |||||||
5425 Wisconsin Avenue | |||||||
Suite #701 | |||||||
Chevy Chase, MD 20815 | |||||||
BC Alpha Holdings I, LLC (5) | 1,480,693 | 15.77 | % | ||||
c/o Blackstreet Capital Management, LLC | |||||||
5425 Wisconsin Avenue | |||||||
Suite #701 | |||||||
Chevy Chase, MD 20815 | |||||||
Blackstreet Capital Advisors II, LLC (6) | 667,511 | 7.11 | % | ||||
c/o Blackstreet Capital Management, LLC | |||||||
5425 Wisconsin Avenue | |||||||
Suite #701 | |||||||
Chevy Chase, MD 20815 |
* less than one percent.
(1) | Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and includes general voting power and/or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options or warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the record rate, and shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of other securities currently convertible or convertible within 60 days, are deemed outstanding for computing the beneficial ownership percentage of the person holding such securities but are not deemed outstanding for computing the beneficial ownership percentage of any other person. Under the applicable SEC rules, each person’s beneficial ownership is calculated by dividing the total number of shares with respect to which they possess beneficial ownership by the total number of outstanding shares of the Company. In any case where an individual has beneficial ownership over securities that are not outstanding, but are issuable upon the exercise of options or warrants or similar rights within the next 60 days, that same number of shares is added to the denominator in the calculation described above. Because the calculation of each person’s beneficial ownership set forth in the “Percentage of Common Shares” column of the table may include shares that are not presently outstanding, the sum total of the percentages set forth in such column may exceed 100%. |
(2) | Includes 9,923 common shares held by Blue Jays Investment 2, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company to which Mr. Berger is a member and manager and taken from Mr. Berger’s most recent filing under §13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed on June 8, 2016. Mr. Berger disclaims ownership of the shares held by Blue Jays Investment 2, LLC except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in the shares. Also includes 5,150 shares held directly by Mr. Berger, 4,600 shares held by Mr. Berger’s spouse, and 1,375 shares held by Mr. Berger or his spouse as a UTMA custodian for a minor. |
36
(3) | Consists of Messrs. Miller, Roberts, Berger, Kuby, Quandahl, Irlbeck, and Donchev. |
(4) | Share figures contained in the table are taken from WCR, LLC’s most recent filing under §13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed on January 9, 2017. |
(5) | Share figures contained in the table are taken from BC Alpha Holdings I, LLC’s most recent filing under §13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed on January 9, 2017. |
(6) | Share figures contained in the table are taken from Blackstreet Capital Advisors II, LLC’s most recent filing under §13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed on January 9, 2017. |
ITEM 13 | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS
None.
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTION POLICY
The Board of Directors has adopted a written Conflict of Interest and Related Party Transaction Policy. That policy governs the approval of all related-party transactions, subject only to certain customary exceptions (e.g., compensation, certain charitable donations, transactions made available to all employees generally, etc.). The policy contains a minimum dollar threshold of $5,000.
The entire Board of Directors administers the policy and approves any related-party transactions. At each calendar year’s first regularly scheduled meeting, management discloses any known related-party transactions to be entered into by the Company for that calendar year, including the proposed aggregate value of such transactions if applicable. After full disclosure of all material facts, review and discussion, the board votes whether to approve the proposed transactions. If a related-party transaction will be ongoing, the board may establish guidelines for management to follow in its ongoing dealings with the related party. However, management is generally required to update the board as to any material change to the related-party transactions approved at the first calendar year meeting.
In the event management recommends any related-party transactions after the first calendar year meeting, such transactions are generally presented to the board for approval in advance, or preliminarily entered into by management subject to ratification by the board. If ratification is not obtained, management must make all reasonable efforts to cancel or annul such transaction.
Procedurally, no director is allowed vote in any approval of a related-party transaction for which he or she is the related party, except that such a director may otherwise participate in a related discussion and shall provide to the board all material information concerning the related-party transaction and the director’s interest therein.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The Company does not have a standing nominating committee. Instead, the entire Board of Directors shares the responsibility of identifying potential director-nominees to serve on the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors does have a standing Compensation Committee and Audit Committee. The Compensation Committee is composed of Mr. Roberts. The Audit Committee is composed of Mr. Roberts. The Board of Directors has determined that only Mr. Roberts is “independent,” as such term is defined in Section 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq listing rules, and meets the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act. The preceding disclosure respecting director independence is required under applicable SEC rules. However, as a corporation whose shares are listed for trading on the OTCQB, we are not required to have any independent directors at all on our Board of Directors, or any independent directors serving on any particular committees of the Board of Directors.
37
ITEM 14 | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
The following table summarizes the fees we were billed for audit and non-audit services rendered for fiscal years 2017 and 2016. Our predecessor auditor, KLJ and Associates, audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements for 2016. On July 29, 2017, we replaced our predecessor auditor with Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC. We had no disagreements with our predecessor auditor. Sadler, Gibb & Associates reviewed the quarterly filings through September 30, 2017 and audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2017.
Successor
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | Predecessor
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
Audit Fees | $ | 120,000 | $ | — | $ | 13,000 | $ | 153,500 | ||||||||
Audit-Related Fees | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Tax Fees | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
All Other Fees | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 120,000 | $ | — | $ | 13,000 | $ | 153,500 |
Neither our successor auditor Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC nor our predecessor auditor KLJ and Associates, LLP performed any other audit-related, tax-related or other services for fees during either of fiscal 2017 or 2016.
Audit Fees. The fees identified under this caption were for professional fees rendered in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, review of our quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements and statutory and regulatory filings and engagements for the years identified.
Approval Policy. Our Audit Committee approves in advance all services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. All engagements of our independent registered public accounting firms in years ended 2017 and 2016 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
38
ITEM 15 EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Financial Statements
Item | Page | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements | F-1 | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | F-3 | |
Consolidated Statements of Income – Years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | F-4 | |
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity – Years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | F-5 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | F-6 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-7 |
EXHIBITS
39
40
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Western Capital Resources, Inc. |
|||
/s/ John Quandahl | 3/29/18 | ||
John Quandahl | |||
Chief Executive Officer | |||
/s/ Angel Donchev | 3/29/18 | ||
Angel Donchev | |||
Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ John Quandahl | 3/29/18 | /s/ Jonathan Tipton | 3/29/18 | |
John Quandahl, Director, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer |
Jonathan Tipton, Director |
|||
/s/ Ellery Roberts | 3/29/18 | |||
Ellery Roberts, Director | ||||
/s/ Angel Donchev | 3/29/18 |
/s/ Kevin Kuby |
3/29/18 | |
Angel Donchev, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) |
Kevin Kuby, Director |
|||
/s/ Richard Miller | 3/29/18 | |||
Richard Miller, Director |
41