Western Midstream Partners, LP - Quarter Report: 2013 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013
Or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-35753
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 46-0967367 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1201 Lake Robbins Drive | 77380 | |
The Woodlands, Texas | (Zip Code) | |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(832) 636-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer þ Smaller reporting company ¨
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
There were 218,895,515 common units outstanding as of July 31, 2013.
Table of Contents
PART I |
PAGE | |||||||
Item 1. |
||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 |
4 | |||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 |
5 | |||||||
Consolidated Statement of Equity and Partners Capital for the six months ended June 30, 2013 |
6 | |||||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 |
7 | |||||||
8 | ||||||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
24 | ||||||
24 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results to Those of WES |
28 | |||||||
32 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
42 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
Item 3. |
48 | |||||||
Item 4. |
49 | |||||||
PART II |
||||||||
Item 1. |
49 | |||||||
Item 1A. |
49 | |||||||
Item 6. |
50 |
2
Table of Contents
DEFINITIONS
As generally used within the energy industry and in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the identified terms have the following meanings:
Barrel or Bbl: 42 U.S. gallons measured at 60 degrees Fahrenheit.
Btu: British thermal unit; the approximate amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit.
Condensate: A natural gas liquid with a low vapor pressure mainly composed of propane, butane, pentane and heavier hydrocarbon fractions.
Cryogenic: The process in which liquefied gases, such as liquid nitrogen or liquid helium, are used to bring volumes to very low temperatures (below approximately -238 degrees Fahrenheit) to separate natural gas liquids from natural gas. Through cryogenic processing, more natural gas liquids are extracted than when traditional refrigeration methods are used.
Drip condensate: Heavier hydrocarbon liquids that fall out of the natural gas stream and are recovered in the gathering system without processing.
Fractionation: The process of applying various levels of higher pressure and lower temperature to separate a stream of natural gas liquids into ethane, propane, normal butane, isobutane and natural gasoline.
Imbalance: Imbalances result from (i) differences between gas volumes nominated by customers and gas volumes received from those customers and (ii) differences between gas volumes received from customers and gas volumes delivered to those customers.
MBbls/d: One thousand barrels per day.
MMBtu: One million British thermal units.
MMcf/d: One million cubic feet per day.
Natural gas liquid(s) or NGL(s): The combination of ethane, propane, normal butane, isobutane and natural gasolines that, when removed from natural gas, become liquid under various levels of higher pressure and lower temperature.
Residue: The natural gas remaining after being processed or treated.
3
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
thousands except unit and per-unit amounts | 2013 | 2012 (1) | 2013 | 2012 (1) | ||||||||||||
Revenues affiliates |
||||||||||||||||
Gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas and natural gas liquids |
$ | 69,175 | $ | 59,941 | $ | 135,074 | $ | 121,060 | ||||||||
Natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales |
129,996 | 104,008 | 241,666 | 209,661 | ||||||||||||
Equity income and other, net |
4,869 | 4,133 | 8,850 | 8,134 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues affiliates |
204,040 | 168,082 | 385,590 | 338,855 | ||||||||||||
Revenues third parties |
||||||||||||||||
Gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas and natural gas liquids |
40,625 | 33,503 | 77,616 | 63,973 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales |
9,565 | 18,218 | 19,624 | 41,051 | ||||||||||||
Other, net |
896 | 507 | 2,043 | 1,107 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues third parties |
51,086 | 52,228 | 99,283 | 106,131 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues |
255,126 | 220,310 | 484,873 | 444,986 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of product (2) |
93,460 | 82,456 | 176,543 | 165,612 | ||||||||||||
Operation and maintenance (2) |
41,669 | 35,690 | 78,408 | 67,811 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative (2) |
8,209 | 10,310 | 17,138 | 20,584 | ||||||||||||
Property and other taxes |
6,086 | 4,833 | 11,871 | 9,670 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and impairments |
36,496 | 27,741 | 68,936 | 54,808 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
185,920 | 161,030 | 352,896 | 318,485 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
69,206 | 59,280 | 131,977 | 126,501 | ||||||||||||
Interest income, net affiliates |
4,225 | 4,225 | 8,450 | 8,450 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense (3) |
(12,654) | (9,560) | (24,465) | (19,141) | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
493 | (1,267) | 1,220 | (809) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
61,270 | 52,678 | 117,182 | 115,001 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
137 | 12,929 | 4,373 | 29,624 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
61,133 | 39,749 | 112,809 | 85,377 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
26,422 | 21,079 | 45,783 | 49,653 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP |
$ | 34,711 | $ | 18,670 | $ | 67,026 | $ | 35,724 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Limited partners interest in net income: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP |
$ | 34,711 | $ | 67,026 | ||||||||||||
Pre-acquisition net (income) loss allocated to Anadarko |
764 | (4,637) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Limited partners interest in net income (4) |
$ | 35,475 | $ | 62,389 | ||||||||||||
Net income per common unit basic and diluted |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.29 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common units outstanding basic and diluted |
218,896 | $ | 218,896 |
(1) | Financial information has been recast to include the financial position and results attributable to the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest. See Note 2. |
(2) | Cost of product includes product purchases from Anadarko (as defined in Note 1) of $32.1 million and $64.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and $39.3 million and $72.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Operation and maintenance includes charges from Anadarko of $14.2 million and $27.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and $12.9 million and $25.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. General and administrative includes charges from Anadarko of $5.8 million and $11.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and $7.8 million and $16.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. See Note 5. |
(3) | Includes affiliate (as defined in Note 1) interest expense of zero for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, and $1.3 million and $2.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. See Note 8. |
(4) | Represents net income for periods including and subsequent to the acquisition of WES assets (as defined in Note 1). See Note 4. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
thousands except number of units | 2013 | 2012 (1) | ||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 92,412 | $ | 422,556 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net (2) |
76,847 | 48,550 | ||||||
Other current assets (3) |
6,533 | 6,998 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
175,792 | 478,104 | ||||||
Note receivable Anadarko |
260,000 | 260,000 | ||||||
Plant, property and equipment |
||||||||
Cost |
3,873,539 | 3,432,392 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
779,513 | 714,436 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net property, plant and equipment |
3,094,026 | 2,717,956 | ||||||
Goodwill |
105,336 | 105,336 | ||||||
Other intangible assets |
54,798 | 55,490 | ||||||
Equity investments |
211,151 | 106,130 | ||||||
Other assets |
26,678 | 27,798 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,927,781 | $ | 3,750,814 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES, EQUITY AND PARTNERS CAPITAL |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts and natural gas imbalance payables (4) |
$ | 23,423 | $ | 25,154 | ||||
Accrued ad valorem taxes |
11,805 | 11,949 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
663 | 552 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities (5) |
110,613 | 148,600 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
146,504 | 186,255 | ||||||
Long-term debt third parties |
1,418,362 | 1,168,278 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
1,852 | 47,153 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations and other |
74,827 | 68,749 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total long-term liabilities |
1,495,041 | 1,284,180 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
1,641,545 | 1,470,435 | ||||||
Equity and partners capital |
||||||||
Common units (218,895,515 units issued and outstanding |
834,798 | 912,376 | ||||||
Net investment by Anadarko |
| 199,960 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total partners capital |
834,798 | 1,112,336 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
1,451,438 | 1,168,043 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total equity and partners capital |
2,286,236 | 2,280,379 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities, equity and partners capital |
$ | 3,927,781 | $ | 3,750,814 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Financial information has been recast to include the financial position and results attributable to the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest. See Note 2. |
(2) | Accounts receivable, net includes amounts receivable from affiliates (as defined in Note 1) of $43.5 million and $17.5 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. |
(3) | Other current assets includes natural gas imbalance receivables from affiliates of $0.1 million and $0.4 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. |
(4) | Accounts and natural gas imbalance payables includes amounts payable to affiliates of $2.7 million and $2.5 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. |
(5) | Accrued liabilities include amounts payable to affiliates of $0.1 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY AND PARTNERS CAPITAL
(UNAUDITED)
Partners Capital | ||||||||||||||||
thousands | Net Investment by Anadarko |
Common Units |
Noncontrolling Interests |
Total | ||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2012 (1) |
$ | 199,960 | $ | 912,376 | $ | 1,168,043 | $ | 2,280,379 | ||||||||
Net income |
4,637 | 62,389 | 45,783 | 112,809 | ||||||||||||
Offering expenses from the issuance of WGP common units |
| (250) | | (250) | ||||||||||||
WES equity transactions, net (2) |
| 116,232 | 299,887 | 416,119 | ||||||||||||
Contributions received from Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners |
| | 1,097 | 1,097 | ||||||||||||
Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners |
| | (4,660) | (4,660) | ||||||||||||
Distributions to WES common unitholders |
| | (58,929) | (58,929) | ||||||||||||
Distributions to WGP unitholders |
| (46,980) | | (46,980) | ||||||||||||
Acquisition from affiliates |
(255,642) | (209,858) | | (465,500) | ||||||||||||
Contributions of equity-based compensation from Anadarko |
| 1,372 | 38 | 1,410 | ||||||||||||
Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko |
4,515 | | | 4,515 | ||||||||||||
Elimination of net deferred tax liabilities |
46,530 | | | 46,530 | ||||||||||||
Other |
| (483) | 179 | (304) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2013 |
$ | | $ | 834,798 | $ | 1,451,438 | $ | 2,286,236 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Financial information has been recast to include the financial position and results attributable to the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest. See Note 2. |
(2) | Includes the impact of Western Gas Partners, LPs May 2013 public equity offering and common units issued in connection with the acquisition of the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest as described in Note 4 and Note 2. The $116.2 million increase to partners capital, together with net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP, totaled $183.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
thousands | 2013 | 2012 (1) | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 112,809 | $ | 85,377 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and impairments |
68,936 | 54,808 | ||||||
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense |
1,818 | 1,834 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
1,229 | (5,406) | ||||||
Debt-related amortization and other items, net |
1,126 | 1,030 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net |
(26,951) | 12,723 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts and natural gas imbalance payables and accrued liabilities, net |
255 | (9,948) | ||||||
Change in other items, net |
3,190 | 4,407 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
162,412 | 144,825 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(339,756) | (193,053) | ||||||
Acquisitions from affiliates |
(466,936) | (465,507) | ||||||
Acquisitions from third parties |
(212,674) | | ||||||
Investments in equity affiliates |
(29,824) | | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets to affiliates |
82 | 11 | ||||||
Other |
(382) | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,049,490) | (658,549) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Borrowings, net of debt issuance costs |
494,948 | 886,369 | ||||||
Repayments of debt |
(245,000) | (549,000) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in outstanding checks |
(1,809) | (1,010) | ||||||
Offering expenses from the issuance of WGP common units |
(2,367) | | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of WES common units, net of offering expenses |
416,119 | 212,096 | ||||||
Distributions to WGP unitholders |
(46,980) | | ||||||
Contributions received from Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners (including Anadarko) |
1,097 | 21,315 | ||||||
Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners (including Anadarko) |
(4,660) | (10,339) | ||||||
Distributions to WES common unitholders |
(58,929) | (45,317) | ||||||
Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko |
4,515 | 31,103 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
556,934 | 545,217 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(330,144) | 31,493 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
422,556 | 226,559 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 92,412 | $ | 258,052 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental disclosures |
||||||||
Net distributions to (contributions from) Anadarko of other assets |
$ | 615 | $ | 4,096 | ||||
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest |
$ | 23,516 | $ | 18,186 | ||||
Taxes paid |
$ | | $ | 72 |
(1) | Financial information has been recast to include the financial position and results attributable to the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest. See Note 2. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
General. Western Gas Equity Partners, LP is a Delaware master limited partnership formed in September 2012 to own partnership interests in Western Gas Partners, LP, a publicly traded partnership. Western Gas Equity Partners, LP was formed by converting WGR Holdings, LLC into a limited partnership and changing its name. Western Gas Partners, LP (together with its subsidiaries, WES) is a Delaware master limited partnership formed by Anadarko Petroleum Corporation in 2007 to own, operate, acquire and develop midstream energy assets.
For purposes of these consolidated financial statements, WGP refers to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP in its individual capacity or to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP and its subsidiaries, including Western Gas Holdings, LLC and WES, as the context requires. WES GP refers to Western Gas Holdings, LLC, individually as the general partner of WES, and excludes WES itself. WGPs general partner, Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC (WGP GP), is a wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. Anadarko refers to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, excluding WGP and WGP GP. WGP and Affiliates refers to subsidiaries of Anadarko, including WGP in its individual capacity, and affiliates refers to subsidiaries of Anadarko, excluding WGP and its consolidated subsidiaries, and includes the interests in Fort Union Gas Gathering, LLC (Fort Union), White Cliffs Pipeline, LLC (White Cliffs), Rendezvous Gas Services, LLC (Rendezvous), and a joint venture, Enterprise EF78 LLC (Mont Belvieu JV). See Note 2. Equity investment throughput refers to WESs 14.81% share of Fort Union and 22% share of Rendezvous gross volumes.
WGP owns the following types of partnership interests in WES: (i) a 2.0% general partner interest in WES, held through a wholly owned subsidiary, WES GP; (ii) 100% of the incentive distribution rights (IDRs) in WES held through WES GP, which entitle WGP to receive increasing percentages, up to the maximum level of 48.0%, of any incremental cash distributed by WES as certain target distribution levels are reached in any quarter; and (iii) a significant limited partner interest in WES. WES GPs 2.0% general partner interest in WES constitutes substantially all of WES GPs business, which primarily is to manage the affairs and operations of WES. Refer to Note 4 for a discussion of WGPs holdings of WES equity.
In December 2012, WGP completed its initial public offering (IPO) of 19,758,150 common units representing limited partner interests at a price of $22.00 per common unit, generating net proceeds of $412.0 million. WGP used approximately $409.4 million of the net proceeds from its IPO to purchase common and general partner units of WES.
WES is engaged in the business of gathering, processing, compressing, treating and transporting natural gas, condensate, NGLs and crude oil for Anadarko, as well as third-party producers and customers. As of June 30, 2013, WESs assets, exclusive of interests in Fort Union, White Cliffs, Rendezvous and the Mont Belvieu JV accounted for under the equity method, consisted of the following:
Owned and Operated |
Operated Interests |
Non-Operated
Interests |
||||||||||
Natural gas gathering systems |
13 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||
Natural gas treating facilities |
8 | | | |||||||||
Natural gas processing facilities |
8 | 3 | | |||||||||
NGL pipelines |
3 | | | |||||||||
Interstate natural gas pipeline |
1 | | | |||||||||
Intrastate natural gas pipeline |
1 | | |
These assets are located in South, East and West Texas, the Rocky Mountains (Colorado, Utah and Wyoming), north-central Pennsylvania, and the Mid-Continent (Kansas and Oklahoma). WES completed construction of the Brasada processing facility in South Texas and commenced operations in June 2013. WES was also constructing the Lancaster processing facility in Northeast Colorado at the end of the second quarter of 2013.
8
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (CONTINUED)
Basis of presentation. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of WGP and entities in which it holds a controlling financial interest, including WES and WES GP. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Investments in non-controlled entities over which WES, or WGP through its investment in WES, exercises significant influence are accounted for under the equity method. WGP proportionately consolidates WESs 33.75% share of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses attributable to the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest (see Note 2) and WESs 50% share of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses attributable to the Newcastle system in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial results of WES are included in WGPs consolidated financial statements due to WGPs 100% ownership interest in WES GP and WES GPs control of WES. Throughout these notes to the consolidated financial statements, and to the extent material, any differences between the consolidated financial results of WGP and WES are discussed separately. WGP has no independent operations or material assets other than its partnership interests in WES. WGPs consolidated financial statements differ from those of WES primarily as a result of (i) the presentation of noncontrolling interest ownership (attributable to the limited partner interests in WES held by the public and Anadarko Marcellus Midstream, L.L.C. (AMM) (see Note 2)), (ii) the elimination of WES GPs investment in WES with WES GPs underlying capital account, and (iii) income tax expense and liabilities incurred by WGR Holdings, LLC, computed on a separate-return basis prior to its conversion into a limited partnership.
In preparing financial statements in accordance with GAAP, management makes informed judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Management evaluates its estimates and related assumptions regularly, utilizing historical experience and other methods considered reasonable under the particular circumstances. Changes in facts and circumstances or additional information may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from these estimates. Effects on the business, financial condition and results of operations resulting from revisions to estimates are recognized when the facts that give rise to the revisions become known. The information furnished herein reflects all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements, and certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation.
For the six months ended June 30, 2012, operating cash inflows and investing cash outflows in the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows include a reduction of $16.4 million attributable to the correction of an error discovered during an analysis of accounts payable balances. This analysis revealed that certain 2012 invoices received, but not yet paid, were properly attributable to WESs ongoing capital projects rather than to operating expenses. Management concluded that this misstatement was not material relative to the six months ended June 30, 2012, and has corrected the error within the unaudited statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as included in this report.
Certain information and note disclosures commonly included in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with WGPs 2012 Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 28, 2013. Management believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading.
9
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (CONTINUED)
Noncontrolling interests. The interests in Chipeta Processing LLC (Chipeta) held by a third-party member and the limited partner interests in WES held by AMM and the public are reflected as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.
Chipeta. In July 2009, WES acquired a 51% interest in Chipeta and became party to Chipetas limited liability company agreement. On August 1, 2012, WES acquired Anadarkos then remaining 24% membership interest in Chipeta (the additional Chipeta interest). Prior to this transaction, the interests in Chipeta held by Anadarko and a third-party member were reflected as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. The acquisition of Anadarkos then remaining 24% interest was accounted for on a prospective basis as WES acquired an additional interest in an already-consolidated entity. As such, effective August 1, 2012, noncontrolling interest excludes the financial results and operations of the additional Chipeta interest. The remaining 25% membership interest held by the third-party member is reflected within noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. See Note 2.
WES. The publicly held limited partner interests in WES are reflected as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. In addition, in March 2013, WES acquired a 33.75% interest in both the Liberty and Rome gas gathering systems from AMM, a wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. As part of the consideration paid, WES issued 449,129 WES common units to AMM. The limited partner interest in WES held by AMM is reflected within noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. See Note 2.
Presentation of WES assets. References to WES assets refer collectively to the assets indirectly owned by WGP, through its partnership interests in WES, as of June 30, 2013. Because Anadarko controls WES through its ownership and control of WGP, which owns WES GP, each of WESs acquisitions of assets from Anadarko has been considered a transfer of net assets between entities under common control. As such, WES assets acquired from Anadarko were initially recorded at Anadarkos historic carrying value, which did not correlate to the total acquisition price paid by WES. Further, after an acquisition of assets from Anadarko, WES and WGP (by virtue of its consolidation of WES) may be required to recast their financial statements to include the activities of such assets as of the date of common control. See Note 2.
For those periods requiring recast, the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the acquisition of WES assets from Anadarko, including the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest, have been prepared from Anadarkos historical cost-basis accounts and may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if WES had owned the assets during the periods reported. Net income attributable to WES assets for periods prior to WESs acquisition of such assets is not allocated to the limited partners for purposes of calculating net income per common unit.
10
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
2. ACQUISITIONS
The following table presents the acquisitions completed by WES during 2012 and 2013, and identifies the funding sources for such acquisitions:
thousands except unit and percent amounts | Acquisition Date |
Percentage Acquired |
Borrowings | Cash On Hand |
WES Common Units Issued |
WES GP Units Issued |
||||||||||||||||||
MGR (1) |
01/13/12 | 100% | $ | 299,000 | $ | 159,587 | 632,783 | 12,914 | ||||||||||||||||
Chipeta (2) |
08/01/12 | 24% | | 128,250 | 151,235 | 3,086 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-Operated |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marcellus Interest (3) |
03/01/13 | 33.75% | 250,000 | 215,500 | 449,129 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Anadarko-Operated |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marcellus Interest (4) |
03/08/13 | 33.75% | 133,500 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Mont Belvieu JV (5) |
06/05/13 | 25% | | 78,129 | | |
(1) | The assets acquired from Anadarko consist of (i) the Red Desert complex, which is located in the greater Green River Basin in southwestern Wyoming, and includes the Patrick Draw processing plant, the Red Desert processing plant, gathering lines, and related facilities, (ii) a 22% interest in Rendezvous, which owns a gathering system serving the Jonah and Pinedale Anticline fields in southwestern Wyoming, and (iii) certain additional midstream assets and equipment. These assets are collectively referred to as the MGR assets and the acquisition as the MGR acquisition. |
(2) | WES acquired Anadarkos then remaining 24% membership interest in Chipeta (as described in Note 1). WES received distributions related to the additional interest beginning July 1, 2012. This transaction brought WESs total membership interest in Chipeta to 75%. The remaining 25% membership interest in Chipeta held by a third-party member is reflected as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. |
(3) | WES acquired Anadarkos 33.75% interest (non-operated) in the Liberty and Rome gas gathering systems, serving production from the Marcellus shale in north-central Pennsylvania. The interest acquired is referred to as the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and the acquisition as the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. In connection with the issuance of WES common units, WES GP purchased 9,166 general partner units for consideration of $0.5 million in order to maintain WES GPs 2.0% general partner interest in WES. See Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition below for further information. |
(4) | The interest acquired from a third party consisted of a 33.75% interest in each of the Larrys Creek, Seely and Warrensville gas gathering systems, which are operated by Anadarko and serve production from the Marcellus shale in north-central Pennsylvania. The interest acquired is referred to as the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest and the acquisition as the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. See Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition below for further information, including the preliminary allocation of the purchase price as of June 30, 2013. |
(5) | The acquisition from a third party consisted of a 25% interest in Enterprise EF78 LLC, an entity formed to design, construct, and own two fractionators located in Mont Belvieu, Texas. The interest acquired is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and is referred to as the Mont Belvieu JV and the acquisition as the Mont Belvieu JV acquisition. See Mont Belvieu JV acquisition below for further information. |
Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. Because the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition was a transfer of net assets between entities under common control, WGPs historical financial statements previously filed with the SEC have been recast in this Form 10-Q to include the results attributable to the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest as if WES owned such assets for all periods presented. The consolidated financial statements for periods prior to WESs acquisition of WES assets from Anadarko, including the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest, have been prepared from Anadarkos historical cost-basis accounts and may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if WES had owned the assets during the periods reported.
11
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
2. ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
The following table presents the revenue and net income impact of the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest on revenue and net income as presented in the historical consolidated statements of income:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||
thousands | WGP Historical |
Non-Operated Marcellus Interest |
Combined | |||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 205,341 | $ | 14,969 | $ | 220,310 | ||||||
Net income |
32,717 | 7,032 | 39,749 | |||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||
thousands | WGP Historical |
Non-Operated Marcellus Interest |
Combined | |||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 417,583 | $ | 27,403 | $ | 444,986 | ||||||
Net income |
72,857 | 12,520 | 85,377 |
Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. The Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition were recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Results of operations attributable to the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest were included in the consolidated statements of income beginning on the acquisition date in the first quarter of 2013.
The following is a preliminary allocation of the purchase price as of June 30, 2013, including $1.0 million of post-closing purchase price adjustments, to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition as of the acquisition date:
thousands | ||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
$ | 134,719 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
(174) | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total purchase price |
$ | 134,545 |
The purchase price allocation is based on an assessment of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. The fair values of the interests in the land, right-of-way contracts, and gathering systems were based on the market and income approaches. All fair-value measurements of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represent Level 3 inputs. The current purchase price allocation is preliminary and is subject to change pending post-closing purchase price adjustments; finalization of fair value estimates; and completion of evaluations of property, plant and equipment, asset retirement obligations, contractual arrangements and legal and environmental matters as additional information becomes available and is assessed by WES.
12
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
2. ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
The following table presents the pro forma condensed financial information as if the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2012:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
thousands except per unit amount | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Revenues |
$ | 486,127 | $ | 446,666 | ||||
Net income |
112,958 | 83,592 | ||||||
Net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP |
67,175 | 33,939 | ||||||
Net income per common unit - basic and diluted |
$ | 0.29 | n/a |
The pro forma information is presented for illustration purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have occurred had the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition been completed at the assumed date, nor is it necessarily indicative of future operating results of the combined entity. The pro forma information in the table above includes $3.4 million of revenues and $0.3 million of operating expenses, excluding depreciation, amortization and impairments, attributable to the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest that are included in the consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The pro forma adjustments reflect pre-acquisition results of the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest including (a) estimated revenues and expenses; (b) estimated depreciation and amortization based on the purchase price allocated to property, plant and equipment and estimated useful lives; and (c) interest on borrowings under WESs revolving credit facility to finance the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. The pro forma adjustments include estimates and assumptions based on currently available information. Management believes the estimates and assumptions are reasonable, and the relative effects of the transaction are properly reflected. The pro forma information does not reflect any cost savings or other synergies anticipated as a result of the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition, nor any future acquisition related expenses.
Mont Belvieu JV acquisition. The acquisition purchase price represents WESs 25% share of construction costs incurred by the joint venture partner up to the date of acquisition and 25% of the capitalized interest charged to the financial statements of the Mont Belvieu JV up to the date of acquisition. The allocated capitalized interest is reflected as a component of the equity investment balance recorded upon acquisition. Based on the total estimated net project cost, the construction of the fractionation facilities owned by the Mont Belvieu JV is considered a significant project and satisfies criteria for capitalization of interest. Capitalization of interest subsequent to the acquisition is treated as a basis difference between the cost of the investment and the underlying equity in the net assets of the Mont Belvieu JV. WES will begin to amortize the capitalized interest recognized subsequent to the acquisition upon completion of the facilities, and will reflect the amortization as an adjustment to equity earnings from the Mont Belvieu JV.
13
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
3. PARTNERSHIP DISTRIBUTIONS
WGP partnership distributions. WGPs partnership agreement requires it to distribute all of its available cash (as defined in WGPs partnership agreement) to WGP unitholders of record on the applicable record date within 55 days of the end of each quarter, beginning with the quarter ended December 31, 2012.
On February 21, 2013, WGP paid a prorated quarterly distribution of $0.03587 per common unit, or $7.9 million in aggregate, to WGP unitholders of record at the close of business on February 1, 2013. This was the first distribution declared by the board of directors of WGP GP and was prorated for the 20-day period from the date of the closing of WGPs IPO on December 12, 2012, through the end of the fourth quarter 2012, pursuant to the terms of WGPs partnership agreement. In addition, on April 17, 2013, the board of directors of WGP GP declared a cash distribution to WGP unitholders of $0.17875 per common unit, or $39.1 million in aggregate, for the first quarter of 2013. The distribution was paid on May 22, 2013, to WGP unitholders of record at the close of business on April 30, 2013. On July 17, 2013, the board of directors of WGP GP declared a cash distribution to WGP unitholders of $0.1975 per common unit, or $43.2 million in aggregate, for the second quarter of 2013. The distribution is payable on August 21, 2013, to WGP unitholders of record at the close of business on July 31, 2013.
WES partnership distributions. WESs partnership agreement requires WES to distribute all of its available cash (as defined in WESs partnership agreement) to WES unitholders of record on the applicable record date within 45 days of the end of each quarter. The board of directors of WES GP declared the following cash distributions to WES unitholders for the periods presented:
Total Quarterly | ||||||
thousands except per-unit amounts | Distribution | Total Cash | Date of | |||
Quarters Ended |
per Unit | Distribution | Distribution | |||
2012 |
||||||
March 31 |
$ 0.460 | $ 46,053 | May 2012 | |||
June 30 |
$ 0.480 | $ 52,425 | August 2012 | |||
2013 |
||||||
March 31 |
$ 0.540 | $ 70,143 | May 2013 | |||
June 30 (1) |
$ 0.560 | $ 79,315 | August 2013 |
(1) | On July 17, 2013, the board of directors of WES GP declared a cash distribution to WES unitholders of $0.56 per unit, or $79.3 million in aggregate, including incentive distributions. The cash distribution is payable on August 12, 2013, to WES unitholders of record at the close of business on July 31, 2013. |
4. EQUITY AND PARTNERS CAPITAL
Holdings of WGP equity. WGPs common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol WGP. As of June 30, 2013, Anadarko held 199,137,365 WGP common units, representing a 91.0% limited partner interest in WGP, and, through its ownership of WGP GP, Anadarko indirectly held a non-economic general partner interest in WGP. The public held 19,758,150 WGP common units, representing a 9.0% limited partner interest in WGP.
Net income per common unit. Net income attributable to periods prior to WGPs IPO is attributable to subsidiaries of Anadarko and therefore not allocated to the limited partners for purposes of calculating net income per common unit. As a result, pre-IPO net income, representing the financial results prior to WGPs IPO on December 12, 2012, has been excluded from the limited partners interest in net income.
Holdings of WES equity. As of June 30, 2013, WGP held 49,296,205 WES common units, representing a 43.1% limited partner interest in WES, and, through its ownership of WES GP, WGP indirectly held 2,288,399 general partner units, representing a 2.0% general partner interest in WES, and 100% of WESs IDRs.
14
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
4. EQUITY AND PARTNERS CAPITAL (CONTINUED)
As of June 30, 2013, AMM, a subsidiary of Anadarko, held 449,129 WES common units, representing a 0.4% limited partner interest in WES, and the public held 62,386,227 WES common units, representing a 54.5% limited partner interest in WES, which are both reflected as noncontrolling interests within the consolidated financial statements of WGP (see Note 1 and Note 2).
WES public equity offerings. WES completed the following public offerings of its common units during 2012 and 2013:
thousands except unit and per-unit amounts | WES Common Units Issued (1) |
WES GP Units Issued (2) |
Price Per Unit |
Underwriting Discount and Other Offering Expenses |
Net Proceeds to WES |
|||||||||||||||
June 2012 equity offering |
5,000,000 | 102,041 | $ | 43.88 | $ | 7,468 | $ | 216,409 | ||||||||||||
May 2013 equity offering |
7,015,000 | 143,163 | 61.18 | 13,059 | 424,878 |
(1) | Includes the issuance of 915,000 WES common units pursuant to the full exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option granted in connection with the May 2013 equity offering. |
(2) | Represents general partner units of WES issued to WES GP in exchange for WES GPs proportionate capital contribution to maintain its 2.0% general partner interest. |
WES common and general partner units. The following table summarizes WES common and general partner units issued during the six months ended June 30, 2013:
WES Common Units |
WES General Partner Units |
Total | ||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2012 |
104,660,553 | 2,135,930 | 106,796,483 | |||||||||
Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition |
449,129 | 9,166 | 458,295 | |||||||||
Long-Term Incentive Plan awards |
6,879 | 140 | 7,019 | |||||||||
May 2013 equity offering |
7,015,000 | 143,163 | 7,158,163 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at June 30, 2013 |
112,131,561 | 2,288,399 | 114,419,960 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Affiliate transactions. Revenues from affiliates include amounts earned by WES from services provided to Anadarko as well as from the sale of residue, condensate and NGLs to Anadarko. In addition, WES purchases natural gas from an affiliate of Anadarko pursuant to gas purchase agreements. Operating and maintenance expense includes amounts accrued for or paid to affiliates for the operation of the WES assets, whether in providing services to affiliates or to third parties, including field labor, measurement and analysis, and other disbursements. A portion of general and administrative expenses is paid by Anadarko, which results in affiliate transactions pursuant to the reimbursement provisions of the omnibus agreements of WES and WGP. Affiliate expenses do not bear a direct relationship to affiliate revenues, and third-party expenses do not bear a direct relationship to third-party revenues. See Note 2 for further information related to contributions of assets to WES by Anadarko.
15
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
5. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
Cash management. Anadarko operates a cash management system whereby excess cash from most of its subsidiaries separate bank accounts is generally swept to centralized accounts. Prior to the acquisitions of WES assets, third-party sales and purchases related to such assets were received or paid in cash by Anadarko within its centralized cash management system. Anadarko charged or credited WES interest at a variable rate on outstanding affiliate balances for the periods these balances remained outstanding. The outstanding affiliate balances were entirely settled through an adjustment to net investment by Anadarko in connection with the acquisition of the WES assets. Subsequent to the acquisition of the WES assets from Anadarko, transactions related to such assets are cash-settled directly with third parties and with Anadarko affiliates, and affiliate-based interest expense on current intercompany balances is not charged. Chipeta cash settles its transactions directly with third parties and Anadarko, as well as with the other subsidiaries of WES.
Note receivable from and amounts payable to Anadarko. Concurrently with the closing of WESs May 2008 IPO, WES loaned $260.0 million to Anadarko in exchange for a 30-year note bearing interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.50%, payable quarterly. The fair value of the note receivable from Anadarko was approximately $307.0 million and $334.8 million at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively. The fair value of the note reflects consideration of credit risk and any premium or discount for the differential between the stated interest rate and quarter-end market interest rate, based on quoted market prices of similar debt instruments. Accordingly, the fair value of the note receivable from Anadarko is measured using Level 2 inputs.
In 2008, WES entered into a five-year $175.0 million term loan agreement with Anadarko, which was repaid in full in June 2012 using the proceeds from the issuance of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022. See Note 8.
Commodity price swap agreements. WES has commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko to mitigate exposure to commodity price volatility that would otherwise be present as a result of the purchase and sale of natural gas, condensate or NGLs. Notional volumes for each of the commodity price swap agreements are not specifically defined; instead, the commodity price swap agreements apply to the actual volume of natural gas, condensate and NGLs purchased and sold at the Granger, Hilight, Hugoton, Newcastle, MGR and Wattenberg assets, with various expiration dates through December 2016. The commodity price swap agreements do not satisfy the definition of a derivative financial instrument and, therefore, are not required to be measured at fair value. WES has not entered into any new commodity price swap agreements since the fourth quarter of 2011.
Below is a summary of the fixed price ranges on WESs outstanding commodity price swap agreements as of June 30, 2013:
per barrel except natural gas | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ethane |
$ | 18.32 | | 30.10 | $ | 18.36 | | 30.53 | $ | 18.41 | | 23.41 | $ | 23.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Propane |
$ | 45.90 | | 55.84 | $ | 46.47 | | 53.78 | $ | 47.08 | | 52.99 | $ | 52.90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Isobutane |
$ | 60.44 | | 77.66 | $ | 61.24 | | 75.13 | $ | 62.09 | | 74.02 | $ | 73.89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Normal butane |
$ | 53.20 | | 68.24 | $ | 53.89 | | 66.01 | $ | 54.62 | | 65.04 | $ | 64.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gasoline |
$ | 70.89 | | 92.23 | $ | 71.85 | | 83.04 | $ | 72.88 | | 81.82 | $ | 81.68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Condensate |
$ | 74.04 | | 85.84 | $ | 75.22 | | 83.04 | $ | 76.47 | | 81.82 | $ | 81.68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas (per MMbtu) |
$ | 3.75 | | 6.09 | $ | 4.45 | | 6.20 | $ | 4.66 | | 5.96 | $ | 4.87 |
16
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
5. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes realized gains and losses on commodity price swap agreements:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
thousands | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Gains (losses) on commodity price swap agreements related to sales: (1) |
||||||||||||||||
Natural gas sales |
$ | 2,404 | $ | 11,746 | $ | 7,784 | $ | 21,596 | ||||||||
Natural gas liquids sales |
34,203 | 19,680 | 55,508 | 20,034 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
36,607 | 31,426 | 63,292 | 41,630 | ||||||||||||
Losses on commodity price swap agreements related to purchases (2) |
(22,857) | (27,347) | (42,711) | (44,539) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net gains (losses) on commodity price swap agreements |
$ | 13,750 | $ | 4,079 | $ | 20,581 | $ | (2,909) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Reported in affiliate natural gas, NGLs and condensate sales in the consolidated statements of income in the period in which the related sale is recorded. |
(2) | Reported in cost of product in the consolidated statements of income in the period in which the related purchase is recorded. |
Gas gathering and processing agreements. WES has significant gas gathering and processing arrangements with affiliates of Anadarko on a majority of its systems. Approximately 58% and 64% of WESs gathering, transportation and treating throughput (excluding equity investment throughput and volumes measured in barrels) for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and 59% and 65% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, was attributable to natural gas production owned or controlled by Anadarko. Approximately 54% and 59% of WESs processing throughput (excluding equity investment throughput and volumes measured in barrels) for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and 55% and 59% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, was attributable to natural gas production owned or controlled by Anadarko.
Equipment purchase and sale. The following table summarizes WESs purchases from and sales to Anadarko of pipe and equipment:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
thousands | Purchases | Sales | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Cash consideration |
$ | 1,436 | $ | 6,744 | $ | 82 | $ | 11 | ||||||||
Net carrying value |
773 | 1,751 | 34 | 11 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Partners capital adjustment |
$ | 663 | $ | 4,993 | $ | 48 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
5. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (WGP LTIP). During the six months ended June 30, 2013, WGP GP awarded phantom units under the WGP LTIP to its independent directors, which will vest one year from the grant date in January 2014. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period and was approximately $80,000 and $0.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.
Western Gas Partners, LP 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (WES LTIP). WES GP awards phantom units under the WES LTIP primarily to its independent directors and the Chief Executive Officer. The phantom units awarded to the independent directors vest one year from the grant date, while all other awards are subject to graded vesting over a three-year service period. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period and was approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.
Equity incentive plan and Anadarko incentive plans. General and administrative expenses include equity-based compensation costs allocated by Anadarko for grants made pursuant to (i) the Western Gas Holdings, LLC Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the Incentive Plan) and (ii) the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2008 and 2012 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plans (Anadarko Incentive Plans).
General and administrative expenses included $0.7 million and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and $0.8 million and $1.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, of equity-based compensation expense for awards granted to the executive officers of WES GP and other employees under the Anadarko Incentive Plans, which was allocated to WES by Anadarko.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, general and administrative expenses included $2.1 million and $5.4 million, respectively, of compensation expense for grants of Unit Value Rights, Unit Appreciation Rights (UARs) and Distribution Equivalent Rights under the Incentive Plan to certain executive officers of WES GP as a component of their compensation, which was allocated to WES by Anadarko. Awards outstanding under the Incentive Plan at June 30, 2012, were valued at $757.00 per UAR. WGPs IPO in December 2012 resulted in the vesting of all then unvested Incentive Plan awards and the effective termination of the Incentive Plan.
18
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
5. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
Summary of affiliate transactions. The following table summarizes affiliate transactions, which include revenue from affiliates, reimbursement of operating expenses and purchases of natural gas:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
thousands | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Revenues (1) |
$ | 204,040 | $ | 168,082 | $ | 385,590 | $ | 338,855 | ||||||||
Cost of product (1) |
32,119 | 39,338 | 64,048 | 72,764 | ||||||||||||
Operation and maintenance (2) |
14,186 | 12,929 | 27,552 | 25,402 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative (3) |
5,803 | 7,751 | 11,891 | 16,584 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating expenses |
52,108 | 60,018 | 103,491 | 114,750 | ||||||||||||
Interest income, net (4) |
4,225 | 4,225 | 8,450 | 8,450 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense (5) |
| 1,288 | | 2,603 | ||||||||||||
Distributions to WGP unitholders (6) |
35,596 | | 42,739 | | ||||||||||||
Distributions to WES unitholders (7) |
242 | | 242 | | ||||||||||||
Contributions from Anadarko as a Chipeta noncontrolling interest owner (8) |
| 5,616 | | 10,440 | ||||||||||||
Distributions to Anadarko as a Chipeta noncontrolling interest owner (8) |
| 2,544 | | 5,064 |
(1) | Represents amounts recognized under gathering, treating or processing agreements, and purchase and sale agreements. |
(2) | Represents expenses incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of WES assets, as well as expenses incurred by Anadarko on a historical basis related to WES assets prior to the acquisition of such assets by WES. |
(3) | Represents general and administrative expense incurred on and subsequent to the date of WESs acquisition of WES assets, as well as a management services fee for reimbursement of expenses incurred by Anadarko for periods prior to the acquisition of WES assets by WES. These amounts include equity-based compensation expense allocated to WES by Anadarko (see Equity incentive plan and Anadarko incentive plans within this Note 5) and amounts charged by Anadarko under the WGP omnibus agreement. |
(4) | Represents interest income recognized on the note receivable from Anadarko. |
(5) | For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, includes interest expense recognized on the note payable to Anadarko (see Note 8) and interest imputed on the reimbursement payable to Anadarko for certain expenditures Anadarko incurred in 2011 related to the construction of the Brasada and Lancaster plants. WES repaid the note payable to Anadarko in June 2012, and repaid the reimbursement payable to Anadarko related to the construction of the Brasada and Lancaster plants in the fourth quarter of 2012. See Note receivable from and amounts payable to Anadarko within this Note 5. |
(6) | Represents distributions paid under WGPs partnership agreement. |
(7) | Represents distributions paid under WESs partnership agreement (see Holdings of WES equity in Note 4). |
(8) | As described in Note 2, WES acquired Anadarkos then remaining 24% membership interest in Chipeta on August 1, 2012, and accounted for the acquisition on a prospective basis. As such, contributions from noncontrolling interest owners and distributions to noncontrolling interest owners subsequent to the acquisition date no longer reflect contributions from or distributions to Anadarko. |
Concentration of credit risk. Anadarko was the only customer from whom revenues exceeded 10% of consolidated revenues for all periods presented on the consolidated statements of income.
19
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
A summary of the historical cost of property, plant and equipment is as follows:
thousands | Estimated Useful Life |
June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||||
Land |
n/a | $ | 2,584 | $ | 501 | |||||||
Gathering systems |
3 to 47 years | 3,533,779 | 2,911,572 | |||||||||
Pipelines and equipment |
15 to 45 years | 91,488 | 91,126 | |||||||||
Assets under construction |
n/a | 235,757 | 422,002 | |||||||||
Other |
3 to 25 years | 9,931 | 7,191 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total property, plant and equipment |
3,873,539 | 3,432,392 | ||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
779,513 | 714,436 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net property, plant and equipment |
$ | 3,094,026 | $ | 2,717,956 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
The cost of property classified as Assets under construction is excluded from capitalized costs being depreciated. These amounts represent property that is not yet suitable to be placed into productive service as of the respective balance sheet date. See Note 7.
During the second quarter of 2013, WES recognized a $1.0 million impairment primarily related to the cancellation of various capital projects by the third-party operator of the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest.
7. COMPONENTS OF WORKING CAPITAL
A summary of other current assets is as follows:
thousands | June 30, 2013 |
December 31,
2012 |
||||||
Natural gas liquids inventory |
$ | 2,327 | $ | 1,678 | ||||
Natural gas imbalance receivables |
1,977 | 1,663 | ||||||
Prepaid insurance |
533 | 1,897 | ||||||
Other |
1,696 | 1,760 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total other current assets |
$ | 6,533 | $ | 6,998 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
A summary of accrued liabilities is as follows: |
||||||||
thousands | June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
||||||
Accrued capital expenditures |
$ | 74,435 | $ | 112,311 | ||||
Accrued plant purchases |
17,789 | 16,350 | ||||||
Accrued interest expense |
15,691 | 15,868 | ||||||
Short-term asset retirement obligations |
1,905 | 1,711 | ||||||
Short-term remediation and reclamation obligations |
649 | 799 | ||||||
Other |
144 | 1,561 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total accrued liabilities |
$ | 110,613 | $ | 148,600 | ||||
|
|
|
|
20
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
8. DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE
The following table presents outstanding debt as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands | Principal | Carrying Value |
Fair Value (1) |
Principal | Carrying Value |
Fair Value (1) |
||||||||||||||||||
4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 |
$ | 670,000 | $ | 673,449 | $ | 656,895 | $ | 670,000 | $ | 673,617 | $ | 669,928 | ||||||||||||
5.375% Senior Notes due 2021 |
500,000 | 494,913 | 537,550 | 500,000 | 494,661 | 499,946 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revolving credit facility |
250,000 | 250,000 | 250,000 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total debt outstanding |
$ | 1,420,000 | $ | 1,418,362 | $ | 1,444,445 | $ | 1,170,000 | $ | 1,168,278 | $ | 1,169,874 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Fair value is measured using Level 2 inputs. |
Debt activity. The following table presents debt activity for the six months ended June 30, 2013:
thousands | Carrying Value | |||
Balance as of December 31, 2012 |
$ | 1,168,278 | ||
WES revolving credit facility borrowings |
495,000 | |||
Repayments of WES revolving credit facility |
(245,000) | |||
Other |
84 | |||
|
|
|||
Balance as of June 30, 2013 |
$ | 1,418,362 | ||
|
|
WES Senior Notes. In June 2012, WES completed the offering of $520.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 at a price to the public of 99.194% of the face amount. In October 2012, WES issued an additional $150.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 at a price to the public of 105.178% of the face amount. The October 2012 notes and the June 2012 notes were issued under the same indenture and are considered a single class of securities, collectively referred to as the 2022 Notes.
In May 2011, WES completed the offering of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2021 (the 2021 Notes) at a price to the public of 98.778% of the face amount.
At June 30, 2013, WES was in compliance with all covenants under the indentures governing the 2021 Notes and 2022 Notes.
Interest rate agreements. In May 2012, WES entered into U.S. Treasury Rate lock agreements to mitigate the risk of rising interest rates prior to the issuance of the 2022 Notes. WES settled the rate lock agreements simultaneously with the June 2012 offering of the 2022 Notes, realizing a loss of $1.7 million, which is included in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income.
WES note payable to Anadarko. In 2008, WES entered into a five-year $175.0 million term loan agreement with Anadarko. The interest rate was fixed at 2.82% prior to June 2012 when the note payable to Anadarko was repaid in full with proceeds from the June 2012 offering of the 2022 Notes.
WES revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the interest rate on WESs $800.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility (WES RCF) was 1.70% and 1.71%, respectively. WES is required to pay a quarterly facility fee currently ranging from 0.20% to 0.35% of the commitment amount (whether used or unused), based upon its senior unsecured debt rating. The facility fee rate was 0.25% at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
At June 30, 2013, WES had $250.0 million of outstanding borrowings, $12.8 million in outstanding letters of credit issued and $537.2 million available for borrowing under the WES RCF. At June 30, 2013, WES was in compliance with all covenants under the WES RCF.
21
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
8. DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE (CONTINUED)
The 2022 Notes, the 2021 Notes and obligations under the WES RCF are recourse to WES GP and as of December 31, 2012, WES GP was indemnified by a wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko, Western Gas Resources, Inc. (WGRI), against any claims made against WES GP under the 2022 Notes, the 2021 Notes and/or the WES RCF. In connection with the acquisition of the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest in March 2013, WES GP and another wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko entered into an indemnification agreement (the 2013 Indemnification Agreement) whereby such subsidiary agreed to indemnify WES GP for any recourse liability it may have for WES RCF borrowings, or other debt financing, attributable to the acquisitions of the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest or the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest. As of June 30, 2013, the 2013 Indemnification Agreement applied to such debt financings up to $250.0 million. WES GP and WGRI also amended and restated the existing indemnity agreement between them to reduce the amount for which WGRI would indemnify WES GP by an amount equal to any amounts payable to WES GP under the 2013 Indemnification Agreement.
Working capital facility. On November 1, 2012, WGP entered into a $30.0 million working capital facility (the WGP WCF) with Anadarko as the lender. The facility is available exclusively to fund WGPs working capital borrowings. Borrowings under the facility will mature on November 1, 2017 and will bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%. The interest rate was 1.70% and 1.71% at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
WGP is required to reduce all borrowings under the WGP WCF to zero for a period of at least 15 consecutive days during the twelve month period commencing on November 1, 2012, and during the twelve month period commencing on each anniversary thereof. As of June 30, 2013, WGP had no outstanding borrowings under the WGP WCF and WGP was in compliance with all covenants under the WGP WCF.
Interest expense. The following table summarizes the amounts included in interest expense:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
thousands | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Third parties |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense on long-term debt |
$ | 14,850 | $ | 8,202 | $ | 28,789 | $ | 16,117 | ||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs and commitment fees (1) |
1,064 | 1,016 | 2,117 | 2,024 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
(3,260) | (946) | (6,441) | (1,603) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total interest expense third parties |
12,654 | 8,272 | 24,465 | 16,538 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Affiliates |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense on note payable to Anadarko (2) |
| 1,206 | | 2,440 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense on affiliate balances (3) |
| 82 | | 163 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total interest expense affiliates |
| 1,288 | | 2,603 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 12,654 | $ | 9,560 | $ | 24,465 | $ | 19,141 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, includes $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of amortization of (i) the original issue discount for the June 2012 offering partially offset by the original issue premium for the October 2012 offering of the 2022 Notes, (ii) original issue discount for the 2021 Notes and (iii) underwriters fees. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, includes $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of amortization of the original issue discount and underwriters fees for the 2022 Notes issued in June 2012 and the 2021 Notes. |
(2) | In June 2012, the note payable to Anadarko was repaid in full. See Note payable to Anadarko within this Note 8. |
(3) | Imputed interest expense on the reimbursement payable to Anadarko for certain expenditures Anadarko incurred in 2011 related to the construction of the Brasada and Lancaster plants. In the fourth quarter of 2012, WES repaid the reimbursement payable to Anadarko associated with the construction of the Brasada and Lancaster plants. |
22
Table of Contents
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation and legal proceedings. In March 2011, DCP Midstream LP (DCP) filed a lawsuit against Anadarko and others, including a subsidiary of WES, Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC, in Weld County District Court (the Court) in Colorado, alleging that Anadarko and its affiliates diverted gas from DCPs gathering and processing facilities in breach of certain dedication agreements. In addition to various claims against Anadarko, DCP is claiming unjust enrichment and other damages against Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC, the entity which holds the Wattenberg assets. Anadarko countersued DCP asserting that DCP has not properly allocated values and charges to Anadarko for the gas that DCP gathers and/or processes, and seeks a judgment that DCP has no valid gathering or processing rights to much of the gas production it is claiming, in addition to other claims.
In July 2011, the Court denied the defendants motion to dismiss without ruling on the merits and the case is in the discovery phase. Trial is set for April 2014. Management does not believe the outcome of this proceeding will have a material effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of WGP. WES intends to vigorously defend this litigation. Furthermore, without regard to the merit of DCPs claims, management believes that WES has adequate contractual indemnities covering the claims against it in this lawsuit.
In addition, from time to time, WGP, through its partnership interests in WES, is involved in legal, tax, regulatory and other proceedings in various forums regarding performance, contracts and other matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. Management is not aware of any such proceeding for which a final disposition could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of WGP.
Other commitments. WES has short-term payment obligations, or commitments, related to its capital spending programs, as well as those of its unconsolidated affiliates. As of June 30, 2013, WES had unconditional payment obligations for services to be rendered or products to be delivered in connection with its capital projects of approximately $31.2 million, the majority of which is expected to be paid in the next twelve months. These commitments relate primarily to the continued construction of the Lancaster plant and an expansion project at the Fort Lupton compressor station in the Wattenberg system. In addition, in conjunction with the Mont Belvieu JV acquisition, WES is committed to fund 25%, or approximately $21.9 million, of the total remaining estimated net project cost to complete the construction of the fractionation facilities over the next nine months (see Note 2).
Lease commitments. Anadarko, on WESs behalf, has entered into lease agreements for corporate offices, shared field offices and a warehouse supporting WESs operations. The leases for the corporate offices and shared field offices extend through 2017 and 2018, respectively, and the lease for the warehouse extends through February 2014 and includes an early termination clause.
Rent expense associated with the office, warehouse and equipment leases was $0.7 million and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and $0.8 million and $1.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.
23
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion analyzes our financial condition and results of operations and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements, which are included under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report, as well as our historical consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, which are included in Part I, Item 8 of our 2012 Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on March 28, 2013, and other public filings and press releases. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to WGP, we, us, our, or Western Gas Equity Partners refer to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP in its individual capacity or to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP and its subsidiaries, as the context requires. Our general partner, Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC (WGP GP), is a wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. The general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP (WES) is Western Gas Holdings, LLC (WES GP), our wholly owned subsidiary. Anadarko refers to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, excluding us and WGP GP. WGP and Affiliates refers to subsidiaries of Anadarko, including us in our individual capacity, and affiliates refers to subsidiaries of Anadarko excluding us, and includes the interests in Fort Union Gas Gathering, LLC, (Fort Union), White Cliffs Pipeline, LLC (White Cliffs), Rendezvous Gas Services, LLC (Rendezvous), and a joint venture, Enterprise EF78 LLC (Mont Belvieu JV). Equity investment throughput refers to WESs 14.81% share of Fort Union and 22% share of Rendezvous gross volumes.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We have made in this report, and may from time to time otherwise make in other public filings, press releases and discussions by management, forward-looking statements concerning our operations, economic performance and financial condition. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology including may, will, believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, continue, or other similar words. These statements discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of operations or financial condition or include other forward-looking information. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will be realized.
These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to, the following risks and uncertainties:
| our ability to pay distributions to our unitholders; |
| our expected receipt of, and the amounts of, distributions from WES; |
| WESs and Anadarkos assumptions about the energy market; |
| WESs future throughput, including Anadarkos production, which is gathered or processed by or transported through WESs assets; |
| operating results of WES; |
| competitive conditions; |
| technology; |
| availability of capital resources to fund acquisitions, capital expenditures and other contractual obligations of WES, and WESs ability to access those resources from Anadarko or through the debt or equity capital markets; |
| supply of, demand for, and the price of, oil, natural gas, NGLs and related products or services; |
| weather; |
| inflation; |
24
Table of Contents
| availability of goods and services; |
| general economic conditions, either internationally or domestically or in the jurisdictions in which WES is doing business; |
| changes in regulations at the federal, state and local level or WESs inability to timely obtain or maintain permits that could affect WESs and WESs customers activities; environmental risks; regulations by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC); and liability under federal and state laws and regulations; |
| legislative or regulatory changes affecting our or WESs status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes; |
| changes in the financial or operational condition of WES or Anadarko; |
| changes in WESs or Anadarkos capital program, strategy or desired areas of focus; |
| WESs commitments to capital projects; |
| ability of WES to utilize its revolving credit facility (WES RCF); |
| creditworthiness of Anadarko or WESs other counterparties, including financial institutions, operating partners, and other parties; |
| our and WESs ability to repay debt; |
| WESs ability to mitigate commodity price risks inherent in its percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts; |
| conflicts of interest between WES, WES GP, WGP and WGP GP, and affiliates, including Anadarko; |
| WESs ability to maintain and/or obtain rights to operate its assets on land owned by third parties; |
| WESs or WGPs ability to acquire assets on acceptable terms; |
| non-payment or non-performance of Anadarko or WESs other significant customers, including under WESs gathering, processing and transportation agreements and its $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko; |
| timing, amount and terms of our or WESs future issuances of equity and debt securities; and |
| other factors discussed below, in Risk Factors included in our 2012 Form 10-K, in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCritical Accounting Policies and Estimates, in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and elsewhere in our other public filings and press releases. |
The risk factors and other factors noted throughout or incorporated by reference in this report could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
25
Table of Contents
We were formed by Anadarko in September 2012 by converting WGR Holdings, LLC into a limited partnership and changing its name to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP. We closed our IPO in December 2012 and own WES GP and a significant limited partner interest in WES, a growth-oriented Delaware master limited partnership organized by Anadarko to own, operate, acquire and develop midstream energy assets. WES currently owns assets located in East, West and South Texas, the Rocky Mountains (Colorado, Utah and Wyoming), north-central Pennsylvania, and the Mid-Continent (Kansas and Oklahoma) and is engaged in the business of gathering, processing, compressing, treating and transporting natural gas, condensate, NGLs and crude oil for Anadarko and its consolidated subsidiaries, as well as for third-party producers and customers. As of June 30, 2013, WES owned and operated thirteen natural gas gathering systems, eight natural gas treating facilities, eight natural gas processing facilities, three NGL pipelines, one interstate natural gas pipeline and one intrastate natural gas pipeline. In addition, WES had interests in five non-operated natural gas gathering systems, one operated natural gas gathering system and three operated natural gas processing facilities, with separate interests accounted for under the equity method in two natural gas gathering systems, a crude oil pipeline and two NGL fractionators currently under construction. WES also had the Lancaster processing facility under construction in Northeast Colorado at the end of the second quarter of 2013.
Significant financial highlights during the first six months of 2013 included the following:
| We raised our distribution to $0.1975 per unit for the second quarter of 2013, representing a 10% increase over the distribution for the first quarter of 2013. |
| WES completed construction and commenced start-up operations in June 2013 of the 200 MMcf/d Brasada gas processing plant in the Eagleford shale area of South Texas. |
| WES announced a project to expand the processing capacity at the Lancaster plant by 300 MMcf/d with the construction of a second cryogenic processing train. Startup is anticipated in the first quarter of 2015. |
| WES completed the acquisition of a 25% interest in the Mont Belvieu JV, which is constructing two NGL fractionators located in Mont Belvieu, Texas. See Acquisitions below. |
| WES issued 7,015,000 common units to the public, generating net proceeds of $424.9 million, including WES GPs proportionate capital contribution to maintain its 2.0% general partner interest. Net proceeds from this offering were used to repay a portion of the amount outstanding under the WES revolving credit facility, with the remaining net proceeds used for general partnership purposes, including the funding of capital expenditures. |
| WES completed the acquisition of Anadarkos 33.75% interest (non-operated) in the Liberty and Rome gas gathering systems in north-central Pennsylvania and the acquisition of a 33.75% interest (operated by Anadarko) in each of the Larrys Creek, Seely and Warrensville gas gathering systems from a third party, also in north-central Pennsylvania. See Acquisitions below. |
| WES raised its distribution to $0.56 per unit for the second quarter of 2013, representing a 4% increase over the distribution for the first quarter of 2013, a 17% increase over the distribution for the second quarter of 2012, and its seventeenth consecutive quarterly increase. |
Significant operational highlights during the first six months of 2013 included the following:
| Throughput attributable to WES totaled 3,139 MMcf/d and 3,023 MMcf/d for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, representing a 15% and an 11% increase, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012. |
| Gross margin (total revenues less cost of product) attributable to WES averaged $0.55 per Mcf for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, representing a 4% and 2% decrease, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012. |
26
Table of Contents
Acquisitions. The following table presents the acquisitions completed by WES during 2012 and 2013, and identifies the funding sources for such acquisitions.
thousands except unit and percent amounts | Acquisition Date |
Percentage Acquired |
Borrowings | Cash On Hand |
WES Common Units Issued |
WES GP Units Issued |
||||||||||||||||||
MGR (1) |
01/13/12 | 100% | $ | 299,000 | $ | 159,587 | 632,783 | 12,914 | ||||||||||||||||
Chipeta (2) |
08/01/12 | 24% | | 128,250 | 151,235 | 3,086 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-Operated |
03/01/13 | 33.75% | 250,000 | 215,500 | 449,129 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Anadarko-Operated |
03/08/13 | 33.75% | 133,500 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Mont Belvieu JV (5) |
06/05/13 | 25% | | 78,129 | | |
(1) | The assets acquired from Anadarko consist of (i) the Red Desert complex, which is located in the greater Green River Basin in southwestern Wyoming, and includes the Patrick Draw processing plant with a capacity of 125 MMcf/d, the Red Desert processing plant with a capacity of 48 MMcf/d, 1,295 miles of gathering lines, and related facilities, (ii) a 22% interest in Rendezvous, which owns a 338-mile mainline gathering system serving the Jonah and Pinedale Anticline fields in southwestern Wyoming, and (iii) certain additional midstream assets and equipment. These assets are collectively referred to as the MGR assets and the acquisition as the MGR acquisition. In connection with the MGR acquisition, WES entered into 10-year, fee-based gathering and processing agreements with Anadarko effective December 1, 2011, for all affiliate throughput on the MGR assets. |
(2) | WES acquired Anadarkos then remaining 24% membership interest in Chipeta (as described in Note 1Description of Business and Basis of Presentation in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q). WES received distributions related to the additional interest beginning July 1, 2012. This transaction brought WESs total membership interest in Chipeta to 75%. The remaining 25% membership interest in Chipeta held by a third-party member is reflected as noncontrolling interests in our consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. |
(3) | WES acquired Anadarkos 33.75% interest (non-operated) in the Liberty and Rome gas gathering systems, serving production from the Marcellus shale in north-central Pennsylvania. The interest acquired is referred to as the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and the acquisition as the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. In connection with the issuance of WES common units, WES GP purchased 9,166 general partner units for consideration of $0.5 million in order to maintain WES GPs 2.0% general partner interest in WES. |
(4) | The interest acquired from a third party consisted of a 33.75% interest in each of the Larrys Creek, Seely and Warrensville gas gathering systems, which are operated by Anadarko and serve production from the Marcellus shale in north-central Pennsylvania. The interest acquired is referred to as the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest and the acquisition as the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. See Note 2Acquisitions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
(5) | The acquisition from a third party consisted of a 25% interest in Enterprise EF78 LLC, an entity formed to design, construct, and own two fractionators located in Mont Belvieu, Texas. The interest acquired is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and is referred to as the Mont Belvieu JV and the acquisition as the Mont Belvieu JV acquisition. See Note 2Acquisitions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
Presentation of WES assets. References to WES assets refer collectively to the assets indirectly owned by WGP, through its partnership interests in WES, as of June 30, 2013. Because Anadarko controls WES through its ownership and control of WGP, which owns WES GP, each of WESs acquisitions of assets from Anadarko has been considered a transfer of net assets between entities under common control. As such, WES assets acquired from Anadarko were initially recorded at Anadarkos historic carrying value, which did not correlate to the total acquisition price paid by WES (see Note 2Acquisitions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q). Further, as a result of common control asset acquisitions, WES and WGP (by virtue of its consolidation of WES) may be required to recast their financial statements to include the activities of such assets as of the date of common control.
WGPs historical financial statements include the results attributable to the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest as if WES owned such assets for all periods presented. The consolidated financial statements for periods prior to WESs acquisition of WES assets from Anadarko, including the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest, have been prepared from Anadarkos historical cost-basis accounts and may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if WES had owned the assets during the periods reported.
27
Table of Contents
WGP initial public offering. On December 12, 2012, we closed our IPO of 19,758,150 common units at a price of $22.00 per common unit. Pursuant to a unit purchase agreement among us, WES and WES GP, we used $409.4 million of the net proceeds from the IPO to purchase 8,722,966 WES common units, and made a corresponding capital contribution to WES on behalf of WES GP to allow WES GP to maintain its 2.0% general partner interest in WES, in exchange for 178,019 WES general partner units, in each case at a price of $46.00 per unit.
WES equity offerings
Public equity offerings. WES completed the following public equity offerings during 2012 and 2013:
thousands except unit and per-unit amounts | WES Common Units Issued (1) |
WES GP Units Issued (2) |
Price Per Unit |
Underwriting Discount and Other Offering Expenses |
Net Proceeds to WES |
|||||||||||||||
June 2012 equity offering |
5,000,000 | 102,041 | $ | 43.88 | $ | 7,468 | $ | 216,409 | ||||||||||||
May 2013 equity offering |
7,015,000 | 143,163 | 61.18 | 13,059 | 424,878 |
(1) | Includes the issuance of 915,000 WES common units pursuant to the full exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option granted in connection with the May 2013 equity offering. |
(2) | Represents general partner units of WES issued to WES GP in exchange for WES GPs proportionate capital contribution to maintain its 2.0% general partner interest. |
Other equity offerings. In August 2012, WES filed a registration statement with the SEC authorizing the issuance of up to $125.0 million of WES common units in amounts, at prices and on terms to be determined by market conditions and other factors at the time of its offerings. As of June 30, 2013, WES had not issued any common units under this registration statement.
ITEMS AFFECTING THE COMPARABLITY OF OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS TO THOSE OF WES
Our consolidated financial statements include the consolidated financial results of WES due to our 100% ownership interest in WES GP and WES GPs control of WES. Our only cash-generating assets consist of our partnership interests in WES, and we currently have no independent operations. As a result, our results of operations do not differ materially from the results of operations of WES, which are reconciled below. The primary items which result in differences between our and WESs results of operations and cash flows are summarized below.
Income taxes. Prior to our conversion from WGR Holdings, LLC to a limited partnership in September 2012, we were a single-member limited liability company. The separate existence of a limited liability company is disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, resulting in the treatment of WGR Holdings, LLC as a division of Anadarko and its inclusion in Anadarkos consolidated income tax return for federal and state tax purposes. The income tax expense recorded on the financial statements of WGR Holdings, LLC, and now included in our consolidated financial statements, reflects our income tax expense and liability on a separate-return basis.
The deferred federal and state income taxes included in our consolidated financial statements are primarily attributable to the temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amount of our investment in WES and our outside tax basis with respect to our partnership interests in WES. When determining the deferred income tax asset and liability balances attributable to our partnership interests in WES, we applied an accounting policy that looks through our investment in WES. The application of such accounting policy resulted in no deferred income taxes being created on the difference between the book and tax basis on the non-tax deductible goodwill portion of our investment in WES in our consolidated financial statements.
Upon the completion of our IPO in December 2012, we became a master limited partnership for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes and therefore are not subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes, except for Texas margin tax.
28
Table of Contents
General and administrative expenses. As a separate publicly traded partnership, we incur general and administrative expenses which are separate from, and in addition to, those incurred by WES. In connection with our IPO in December 2012, we entered into an omnibus agreement with WGP GP and Anadarko that governs the following: (i) our obligation to reimburse Anadarko for expenses incurred or payments made on our behalf in conjunction with Anadarkos provision of general and administrative services to us, including our public company expenses and general and administrative expenses; (ii) our obligation to pay Anadarko, in quarterly installments, an administrative services fee of $250,000 per year (subject to an annual increase as described in the agreement); and (iii) our obligation to reimburse Anadarko for all insurance coverage expenses it incurs or payments it makes on our behalf. Such expenses are recorded as capital contributions from Anadarko and do not impact our cash flows.
Noncontrolling interests. The publicly held common units of WES are reflected as noncontrolling interests in our consolidated financial statements, and are in addition to the noncontrolling interests in Chipeta, which are already reflected as noncontrolling interests in WESs consolidated financial statements. In addition, in March 2013, WES acquired a 33.75% interest in the Liberty and Rome gas gathering systems from AMM, a wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. As part of the consideration paid, WES issued 449,129 WES common units to AMM. The limited partner interest in WES held by AMM is reflected within noncontrolling interests in our consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.
Distributions. Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all of our available cash (as defined in our partnership agreement) within 55 days of the end of each quarter. Our only cash-generating assets are our partnership interests in WES, consisting of general partner units, common units and incentive distribution rights, on which we expect to receive quarterly distributions from WES. Our cash flow and resulting ability to make cash distributions are therefore completely dependent upon WESs ability to make cash distributions with respect to our partnership interests in WES. Generally, our available cash is our cash on hand at the end of a quarter after the payment of our expenses and the establishment of cash reserves and cash on hand resulting from working capital borrowings made after the end of the quarter.
On January 21, 2013, the board of directors of WGP GP declared a prorated quarterly distribution of $0.03587 per unit, or $7.9 million in aggregate, for the fourth quarter of 2012. The distribution was the first declared by us and corresponded to a quarterly distribution of $0.165 per unit, or $0.66 per unit on an annualized basis. The initial distribution was prorated for the 20-day period from the date of the closing of our IPO on December 12, 2012, through the end of the quarter, pursuant to the terms of WGPs partnership agreement. The cash was paid on February 21, 2013, to WGP unitholders of record at the close of business on February 1, 2013.
In addition, on April 17, 2013, the board of directors of WGP GP declared a cash distribution to WGP unitholders of $0.17875 per common unit, or $39.1 million in aggregate, for the first quarter of 2013. The distribution was paid on May 22, 2013, to WGP unitholders of record at the close of business on April 30, 2013.
Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Concurrently with our IPO, WGP GP adopted the Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (WGP LTIP). Upon vesting of each phantom unit, the holder will receive common units of WGP or, at the discretion of WGP GPs board of directors, cash in an amount equal to the market value of common units of WGP on the vesting date. Equity-based compensation expense attributable to grants made under the WGP LTIP impacts cash flows from operating activities only to the extent cash payments are made to a participant in lieu of issuance of WGP common units to the participant. Stock-based compensation expense attributable to awards granted under the WGP LTIP will be amortized over the vesting periods applicable to the awards. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, WGP GP awarded phantom units under the WGP LTIP to its independent directors, which will vest one year from the grant date in January 2014.
29
Table of Contents
Working capital facility. On November 1, 2012, we entered into a $30.0 million working capital facility (WGP WCF) with Anadarko as the lender. The facility is available exclusively to fund our working capital borrowings. Borrowings under the facility will mature on November 1, 2017, and will bear interest at London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.50%. The interest rate was 1.70% and 1.71% at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively.
We are required to reduce all borrowings under the WGP WCF to zero for a period of at least 15 consecutive days during the twelve month period commencing on November 1, 2012, and during the twelve month period commencing on each anniversary thereof. As of June 30, 2013, we had no outstanding borrowings under the WGP WCF. At June 30, 2013, we were in compliance with all covenants under the WGP WCF.
Reconciliation of net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP to net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP. The differences between net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP and net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP are reconciled as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
thousands | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to WES |
$ | 60,200 | $ | 43,309 | $ | 110,857 | $ | 96,960 | ||||||||
Incremental income tax expense (1) |
| (7,850) | | (20,116) | ||||||||||||
Limited partner interests in WES not held by WGP (2) |
(24,562) | (16,789) | (41,692) | (41,120) | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(921) | | (2,186) | | ||||||||||||
Other income |
(6) | | 47 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to WGP |
$ | 34,711 | $ | 18,670 | $ | 67,026 | $ | 35,724 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | The income tax expense recorded in the financial statements of WGR Holdings, LLC, and now reflected in the consolidated financial statements of WGP, reflects our pre-IPO income tax expense and liability on a separate-return basis. Upon the completion of our IPO in December 2012, we became a partnership for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes and therefore are subsequently not subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes, except for Texas margin tax. |
(2) | Represents the portion of net income allocated to the limited partner interests in WES not held by WGP. As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, publicly held limited partner interests represented a 54.5% and 56.6% interest in WES, respectively. As of June 30, 2013, AMM held a 0.4% limited partner interest in WES. |
30
Table of Contents
Reconciliation of net cash provided by operating and financing activities. The differences between net cash provided by operating activities for WGP and WES and the net cash provided by financing activities for WGP and WES are reconciled as follows:
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
thousands | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
WES net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 165,013 | $ | 186,186 | ||||
Income taxes (1) |
| (41,361) | ||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(2,186) | | ||||||
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense |
136 | | ||||||
Change in working capital |
(598) | | ||||||
Other income |
47 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
WGP net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 162,412 | $ | 144,825 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
WES net cash provided by financing activities |
$ | 538,676 | $ | 503,856 | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of WES general partner units (2) |
(9,267) | (4,478) | ||||||
Offering expenses from the issuance of WGP common units (3) |
(2,367) | | ||||||
Distributions to WGP unitholders (4) |
(46,980) | | ||||||
Distributions to WGP from WES (5) |
76,872 | 43,763 | ||||||
Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko (6) |
| 2,076 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
WGP net cash provided by financing activities |
$ | 556,934 | $ | 545,217 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | The income tax expense recorded in the financial statements of WGR Holdings, LLC, and now reflected in the consolidated financial statements of WGP, reflects our pre-IPO income tax expense and liability on a separate-return basis. Upon the completion of our IPO in December 2012, we became a partnership for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes and therefore are subsequently not subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes, except for Texas margin tax. |
(2) | Difference is attributable to elimination upon consolidation of proceeds to WES from issuance of WES general partner units in exchange for WES GPs proportionate capital contribution to maintain its 2.0% general partner interest. |
(3) | Represents additional offering costs incurred in conjunction with WGPs IPO in December 2012. |
(4) | Represents distribution to WGP common unitholders for the pro-rated fourth quarter of 2012 and for the first quarter of 2013. |
(5) | Difference attributable to elimination upon consolidation of WESs distributions on partnership interests owned by WGP. As of June 30, 2013, WGP held a 43.1% limited partner interest in WES and, through its ownership of WES GP, indirectly held a 2.0% general partner interest in WES and 100% of WESs IDRs. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, WES paid $135.8 million and $89.1 million, respectively, to its unitholders, of which $58.9 million and $45.3 million, respectively, were paid to noncontrolling interest owners. |
(6) | Difference attributable to (i) contribution of current tax expense, (ii) changes in net income, and (iii) elimination upon consolidation of proceeds from WES equity transactions and WES distributions to WGP. |
31
Table of Contents
The following tables and discussion present a summary of WESs results of operations:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
thousands | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas and natural gas liquids |
$ | 109,800 | $ | 93,444 | $ | 212,690 | $ | 185,033 | ||||||||
Natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales |
139,561 | 122,226 | 261,290 | 250,712 | ||||||||||||
Equity income and other, net |
5,765 | 4,640 | 10,893 | 9,241 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues (1) |
255,126 | 220,310 | 484,873 | 444,986 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses (1) |
184,999 | 161,030 | 350,710 | 318,485 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
70,127 | 59,280 | 134,163 | 126,501 | ||||||||||||
Interest income, net affiliates |
4,225 | 4,225 | 8,450 | 8,450 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(12,654) | (9,560) | (24,465) | (19,141) | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
499 | (1,267) | 1,173 | (809) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
62,197 | 52,678 | 119,321 | 115,001 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
137 | 5,079 | 4,373 | 9,508 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
62,060 | 47,599 | 114,948 | 105,493 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
1,860 | 4,290 | 4,091 | 8,533 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP (2) |
$ | 60,200 | $ | 43,309 | $ | 110,857 | $ | 96,960 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Key performance metrics (3) |
||||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
$ | 161,666 | $ | 137,854 | $ | 308,330 | $ | 279,374 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
$ | 107,646 | $ | 87,639 | $ | 203,575 | $ | 182,319 | ||||||||
Distributable cash flow |
$ | 89,783 | $ | 72,290 | $ | 168,913 | $ | 154,651 |
(1) | Revenues include amounts earned by WES from services provided to its affiliates, as well as from the sale of residue, condensate and NGLs to its affiliates. Operating expenses include amounts charged by WES affiliates for services as well as reimbursement of amounts paid by affiliates to third parties on WESs behalf. See Note 5Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
(2) | For reconciliations to comparable consolidated results of WGP, see Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results to Those of WES within this Item 2. |
(3) | Gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow are defined under the caption Key Performance Metrics within this Item 2. Such caption also includes reconciliations of Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow to their most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). |
For purposes of the following discussion, any increases or decreases for the three months ended June 30, 2013 refer to the comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2013, to the three months ended June 30, 2012; any increases or decreases for the six months ended June 30, 2013 refer to the comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2013, to the six months ended June 30, 2012; and any increases or decreases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 refer to both the comparisons for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.
32
Table of Contents
Throughput
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
throughput in MMcf/d | 2013 | 2012 | D | 2013 | 2012 | D | ||||||||||||||||||
Gathering, treating and transportation (1) |
1,765 | 1,611 | 10% | 1,696 | 1,608 | 5% | ||||||||||||||||||
Processing (2) |
1,330 | 1,170 | 14% | 1,282 | 1,160 | 11% | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity investment (3) |
211 | 234 | (10)% | 206 | 235 | (12)% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total throughput (4) |
3,306 | 3,015 | 10% | 3,184 | 3,003 | 6% | ||||||||||||||||||
Throughput attributable to noncontrolling interests |
167 | 290 | (42)% | 161 | 280 | (43)% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total throughput attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
3,139 | 2,725 | 15% | 3,023 | 2,723 | 11% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Excludes average NGL pipeline volumes of 19 MBbls/d and 20 MBbls/d for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and 26 MBbls/d for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. Includes 100% of Wattenberg system volumes for all periods presented and throughput beginning March 2013 attributable to the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest. |
(2) | Consists of 100% of Chipeta, Hilight and Platte Valley system volumes, 100% of the Granger and Red Desert complex volumes, and 50% of Newcastle volumes. |
(3) | Represents WESs 14.81% share of Fort Union and 22% share of Rendezvous gross volumes, and excludes WESs 10% share of average White Cliffs pipeline volumes consisting of 7 MBbls/d for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 6 MBbls/d for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. |
(4) | Includes affiliate, third-party and equity-investment volumes. |
Gathering, treating and transportation throughput increased by 154 MMcf/d and 88 MMcf/d for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, due to increased volumes at the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and the additional throughput from the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest beginning in March 2013. These increases were partially offset by decreases at MIGC due to the expiration of a firm transportation agreement effective September 2012 and at the Bison facility resulting from reduced drilling activity in the area.
Processing throughput increased by 160 MMcf/d and 122 MMcf/d for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, primarily due to throughput increases at Chipeta, plus the completion of a pipeline connection that allowed additional throughput to flow into the plant, increased volumes processed at a plant included in the MGR acquisition (the Granger straddle plant), an increase in volumes at the Red Desert complex due to additional well connections during the period, and the start-up of the Brasada plant in June 2013. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in throughput at the Granger complex due to natural production declines in the area.
Equity investment volumes decreased by 23 MMcf/d and 29 MMcf/d for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, primarily due to lower throughput at the Fort Union system due to production declines in the area.
Natural Gas Gathering, Processing and Transportation Revenues
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2013 | 2012 | D | 2013 | 2012 | D | ||||||||||||||||||
Gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas and natural gas liquids |
$ | 109,800 | $ | 93,444 | 18% | $ | 212,690 | $ | 185,033 | 15% |
Gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues increased by $16.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to increases of $6.8 million, $6.7 million and $1.4 million at the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest, the Wattenberg system and Chipeta, respectively, all due to higher volumes, and an increase of $2.8 million due to the addition of the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest beginning in March 2013. These increases were partially offset by decreased revenue of $0.7 million at the Bison facility due to lower volumes as a result of reduced drilling activity in the area, and decreased revenue of $0.5 million at MIGC due to the expiration of a firm transportation agreement effective September 2012.
33
Table of Contents
Gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues increased by $27.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to increases of $12.5 million, $10.2 million and $4.8 million at the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest, the Wattenberg system and Chipeta, respectively, all due to higher volumes, and an increase of $3.4 million due to the addition of the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest beginning in March 2013. These increases were partially offset by decreased revenue of $1.3 million at the Helper system due to a downward rate revision effective April 1, 2012, decreased revenue of $1.3 million at the Bison facility due to lower volumes as a result of reduced drilling activity in the area, and decreased revenue of $1.2 million at MIGC due to the expiration of a firm transportation agreement effective September 2012.
Natural Gas, Natural Gas Liquids and Condensate Sales
thousands except percentages and per-unit amounts | Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | D | 2013 | 2012 | D | |||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas sales |
$ | 29,474 | $ | 23,743 | 24% | $ | 54,991 | $ | 49,301 | 12% | ||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids sales |
102,381 | 92,527 | 11% | 189,598 | 186,169 | 2% | ||||||||||||||||||
Drip condensate sales |
7,706 | 5,956 | 29% | 16,701 | 15,242 | 10% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 139,561 | $ | 122,226 | 14% | $ | 261,290 | $ | 250,712 | 4% | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Average price per unit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
$ | 4.34 | $ | 4.06 | 7% | $ | 4.28 | $ | 4.18 | 2% | ||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) |
$ | 47.73 | $ | 46.94 | 2% | $ | 47.41 | $ | 47.41 | % | ||||||||||||||
Drip condensate (per Bbl) |
$ | 77.71 | $ | 76.03 | 2% | $ | 75.98 | $ | 76.07 | % |
Including the effects of commodity price swap agreements, total natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales increased by $17.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, which consisted of a $5.7 million increase in natural gas sales, a $9.9 million increase in NGLs sales and a $1.8 million increase in drip condensate sales.
For the three months ended June 30, 2013, natural gas sales increased primarily due to a 7% increase in the overall natural gas sales price and higher sales volumes at the Red Desert complex and the Wattenberg system. The growth in NGLs sales for the three months ended June 30, 2013, was primarily due to increases of $11.1 million, $1.5 million and $4.6 million at the Red Desert complex, the Hilight system, and the Granger straddle plant, respectively, due to higher volumes processed and sold. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $5.3 million at Chipeta (with corresponding decreases in cost of product as discussed below), and a decrease of $2.0 million at the Granger complex due to lower volumes sold.
The growth in drip condensate sales for the three months ended June 30, 2013, was primarily due to a $1.5 million increase at the Wattenberg system and a $0.3 million increase at the Platte Valley system, both as a result of more condensate volumes sold.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, including the effects of commodity price swap agreements, total natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales increased by $10.6 million, which consisted primarily of a $5.7 million increase in sales of natural gas, a $3.4 million increase in NGLs sales and a $1.5 million increase in drip condensate sales.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, natural gas sales increased primarily due to a 2% increase in the overall natural gas sales price and higher sales volumes at the Red Desert complex and the Wattenberg system. Natural gas sales also increased by $2.9 million at the Platte Valley system due to an increase in average price, partially offset by a decrease in volume. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $2.9 million at the Hilight system due to a decrease in average price, offset by an increase in volume and a decrease of $1.9 million at the Granger complex due to a decrease in volume, offset by an increase in average price.
The growth in NGLs sales for the six months ended June 30, 2012, was primarily due to increases of $13.3 million, $2.3 million and $4.5 million resulting from higher volumes processed and sold at the Red Desert complex, the Hilight system and the Granger straddle plant, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $9.7 million at Chipeta (with corresponding decreases in cost of product as discussed below), and a decrease of $6.9 million at the Granger complex due to lower volumes sold.
34
Table of Contents
The growth in drip condensate sales for the six months ended June 30, 2013, was primarily due to a $1.2 million increase at the Wattenberg system and a $0.7 million increase at the Platte Valley system, both as a result of more condensate volumes sold.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, average natural gas, NGL and drip condensate prices include the effects of commodity price swap agreements attributable to sales for the Granger, Hilight, Newcastle, Hugoton and Wattenberg systems, and the MGR assets. See Note 5Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Equity Income and Other Revenues
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2013 | 2012 | D | 2013 | 2012 | D | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity income |
$ | 3,724 | $ | 3,335 | 12% | $ | 7,704 | $ | 6,948 | 11% | ||||||||||||||
Other revenues, net |
2,041 | 1,305 | 56% | 3,189 | 2,293 | 39% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 5,765 | $ | 4,640 | 24% | $ | 10,893 | $ | 9,241 | 18% | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income increased by $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, primarily due to an increase in income from White Cliffs of $0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, as a result of increased volumes. Partially offsetting the amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2013, were a $0.2 million decrease in income from Rendezvous and a $0.2 million decrease in income from Fort Union, both as a result of decreased volumes.
Other revenues, net increased by $0.7 million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, primarily due to the collection of deficiency fees associated with volume commitments at Chipeta.
Cost of Product and Operation and Maintenance Expenses
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2013 | 2012 | D | 2013 | 2012 | D | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of product |
$ | 93,460 | $ | 82,456 | 13% | $ | 176,543 | $ | 165,612 | 7% | ||||||||||||||
Operation and maintenance |
41,669 | 35,690 | 17% | 78,408 | 67,811 | 16% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total cost of product and operation and maintenance expenses |
$ | 135,129 | $ | 118,146 | 14% | $ | 254,951 | $ | 233,423 | 9% | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including the effects of commodity price swap agreements on purchases, cost of product expense increased by $11.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as a result of:
a $5.2 million net increase in NGL purchases primarily due to increased purchases at the Red Desert complex and the Wattenberg system, partially offset by decreased purchases at Chipeta and the Granger complex; and
a $5.2 million net increase in residue purchases primarily due to increased purchases at the Red Desert complex, the Wattenberg system, the Platte Valley system, and the Granger straddle plant, partially offset by decreased purchases at the Granger complex and the Hilight system.
35
Table of Contents
Including the effects of commodity price swap agreements on purchases, cost of product expense increased by $10.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as a result of:
a $5.1 million net increase in NGL purchases primarily due to increased purchases at the Red Desert complex, the Hilight system, and the Wattenberg system, partially offset by decreased purchases at Chipeta and the Granger complex; and
a $5.7 million net increase in residue purchases primarily due to increased purchases at the Red Desert complex, the Platte Valley system, the Granger straddle plant and the Wattenberg system, partially offset by decreased purchases at the Granger complex and the Hilight system.
Cost of product expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, includes the effects of commodity price swap agreements attributable to purchases for the Granger, Hilight, Hugoton, Newcastle and Wattenberg systems, and the MGR assets. See Note 5Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Operation and maintenance expense increased by $6.0 million and $10.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, primarily due to increases in property, overhead and facility expense attributable to the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest, and increases in contract labor expense, payroll taxes, electric expense and plant repairs, primarily at Chipeta and the Wattenberg system.
General and Administrative, Depreciation and Other Expenses
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2013 | 2012 | D | 2013 | 2012 | D | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
$ | 7,288 | $ | 10,310 | (29)% | $ | 14,952 | $ | 20,584 | (27)% | ||||||||||||||
Property and other taxes |
6,086 | 4,833 | 26% | 11,871 | 9,670 | 23% | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and impairments |
36,496 | 27,741 | 32% | 68,936 | 54,808 | 26% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total general and administrative, depreciation and other expenses |
$ | 49,870 | $ | 42,884 | 16% | $ | 95,759 | $ | 85,062 | 13% | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses decreased by $3.0 million and $5.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, due to a decrease of $2.2 million and $5.5 million, respectively, in non-cash compensation expenses primarily attributable to the awards outstanding under the Western Gas Holdings, LLC Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the Incentive Plan), which were settled in December 2012 when the Incentive Plan terminated in conjunction with WGPs IPO, and a decrease of $0.8 million and $0.4 million in consulting and audit fees, respectively, partially offset by an increase of $0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, in corporate and management personnel costs for which we reimbursed Anadarko pursuant to WESs omnibus agreement.
Property and other taxes increased by $1.3 million and $2.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, primarily due to ad valorem tax increases at the Platte Valley system and the completion of the Brasada plant in June 2013.
For the three months ended June 30, 2013, depreciation, amortization and impairments increased by $8.8 million primarily attributable to a $2.5 million increase in depreciation and impairment expense associated with the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest, an increase of $3.9 million in depreciation expense associated with capital projects at the Wattenberg system, Chipeta, and the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest, and a $1.2 million increase in depreciation expense related to the completion of the Brasada plant in June 2013.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, depreciation, amortization and impairments increased by $14.1 million primarily attributable to a $3.7 million increase in depreciation and impairment expense associated with the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest, an increase of $7.1 million in depreciation expense associated with capital projects at the Wattenberg system, Chipeta, and the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest, and a $1.2 million increase in depreciation expense related to the completion of the Brasada plant in June 2013.
36
Table of Contents
Interest Income, Net Affiliates and Interest Expense
Three Months
Ended June 30, |
Six Months
Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2013 | 2012 | D | 2013 | 2012 | D | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest income on note receivable |
$ | 4,225 | $ | 4,225 | % | $ | 8,450 | $ | 8,450 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Interest income, net affiliates |
$ | 4,225 | $ | 4,225 | % | $ | 8,450 | $ | 8,450 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Third parties |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense on long-term debt |
$ | (14,850) | $ | (8,202) | 81% | $ | (28,789) | $ | (16,117) | 79% | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs and commitment fees (2) |
(1,064) | (1,016) | 5% | (2,117) | (2,024) | 5% | ||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
3,260 | 946 | nm(1) | 6,441 | 1,603 | nm | ||||||||||||||||||
Affiliates |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense on note payable to Anadarko (3) |
| (1,206) | (100)% | | (2,440) | (100)% | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net on affiliate balances (4) |
| (82) | (100)% | | (163) | (100)% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | (12,654) | $ | (9,560) | 32% | $ | (24,465) | $ | (19,141) | 28% | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Percent change is not meaningful (nm). |
(2) | For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, includes $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of amortization of (i) the original issue discount for the June 2012 offering partially offset by the original issue premium for the October 2012 offering of the $670.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 (the 2022 Notes), (ii) original issue discount for the $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2021 (the 2021 Notes) and (iii) underwriters fees. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, includes $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of amortization of the original issue discount and underwriters fees for the 2022 Notes issued in June 2012 and the 2021 Notes. |
(3) | In June 2012, the note payable to Anadarko was repaid in full. See Note 8Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
(4) | Imputed interest expense on the reimbursement payable to Anadarko for certain expenditures incurred in 2011 related to the construction of the Brasada and Lancaster plants. In the fourth quarter of 2012, WES repaid the reimbursement payable to Anadarko associated with the construction of the Brasada and Lancaster plants. See Note 5Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
Interest expense increased by $3.1 million and $5.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, primarily due to interest expense incurred on the 2022 Notes of $6.5 million and $13.2 million, respectively. Partially offsetting these amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, were increases of capitalized interest of $2.3 million and $4.8 million, respectively, primarily associated with the construction of the Brasada and Lancaster plants and decreases in interest expense of $1.2 million and $2.4 million, respectively, attributable to the repayment of the note payable to Anadarko in June 2012. See Note 8Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q).
Other Income (Expense), Net
Three Months
Ended June 30, |
Six Months
Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2013 | 2012 | D | 2013 | 2012 | D | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
$ | 499 | $ (1,267) | (139 | )% | $ | 1,173 | $ (809) | nm |
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, other income (expense), net included $0.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of interest income related to the capital lease component of a processing agreement assumed in connection with the MGR acquisition. In addition, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, other income (expense), net included $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, on interest earned on overnight investments. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, other income (expense), net included a realized loss of $1.7 million resulting from U.S. Treasury Rate lock agreements settled simultaneously with WESs June 2012 offering of the 2022 Notes. See Note 8Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
37
Table of Contents
Income Tax Expense
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2013 | 2012 | D | 2013 | 2012 | D | ||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 62,197 | $ | 52,678 | 18% | $ | 119,321 | $ | 115,001 | 4% | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
137 | 5,079 | (97)% | 4,373 | 9,508 | (54)% | ||||||||||||||||||
Effective tax rate |
% | 10% | 4% | 8% |
WES is not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes; however, WESs income apportionable to Texas is subject to Texas margin tax. For the periods presented, the variance from the federal statutory rate, which is zero percent as a non-taxable entity, is primarily due to federal and state taxes on pre-acquisition income attributable to WES assets acquired from Anadarko and WESs share of Texas margin tax.
Income attributable to (a) the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest prior to and including March 2013 and (b) the MGR assets prior to and including January 2012 were subject to federal and state income tax. Income earned by the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and MGR assets for periods subsequent to March 2013 and January 2012, respectively, was only subject to Texas margin tax on income apportionable to Texas.
Noncontrolling Interests
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2013 | 2012 | D | 2013 | 2012 | D | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
$ | 1,860 | $ | 4,290 | (57)% | $ | 4,091 | $ | 8,533 | (52)% |
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased by $2.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively, primarily due to WESs acquisition of Anadarkos then remaining 24% membership interest in Chipeta in August 2012. See Note 2Acquisitions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages and gross margin per Mcf |
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | D | 2013 | 2012 | D | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
$ | 161,666 | $ | 137,854 | 17% | $ | 308,330 | $ | 279,374 | 10% | ||||||||||||||
Gross margin per Mcf (1) |
0.54 | 0.50 | 8% | 0.54 | 0.51 | 6% | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross margin per Mcf attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP (1) (2) |
0.55 | 0.53 | 4% | 0.55 | 0.54 | 2% | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP (3) |
107,646 | 87,639 | 23% | 203,575 | 182,319 | 12% | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributable cash flow (3) |
$ | 89,783 | $ | 72,290 | 24% | $ | 168,913 | $ | 154,651 | 9% |
(1) | Average for period. Calculated as gross margin (total revenues less cost of product) divided by total throughput (excluding throughput measured in barrels), including 100% of gross margin and volumes attributable to Chipeta, WESs 14.81% interest in income and volumes attributable to Fort Union and WESs 22% interest in income and volumes attributable to Rendezvous. Gross margin also includes 100% of gross margin attributable to WESs NGL pipelines and WESs 10% interest in income attributable to White Cliffs. |
(2) | Excludes the noncontrolling interest owners proportionate share of revenues, cost of product and throughput. |
(3) | For reconciliations of Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow to their most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, please read the descriptions below under the captions Adjusted EBITDA, Distributable cash flow and Reconciliation to GAAP measures. |
38
Table of Contents
Gross margin and Gross margin per Mcf. Gross margin increased by $23.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to higher margins at the Wattenberg system, the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest, the Granger straddle plant, the Red Desert complex, and the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest.
Gross margin increased by $29.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to higher margins at the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest, the Wattenberg system, the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest and the Granger straddle plant, partially offset by a decrease in margin at MIGC due to the expiration of a firm transportation agreement effective September 2012.
Gross margin per Mcf increased by $0.04 and $0.03 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, primarily due to higher margins and increases in throughput at Chipeta and the Wattenberg and Platte Valley systems, as well as overall changes in the throughput mix of our portfolio.
Adjusted EBITDA. WES defines Adjusted EBITDA as net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP, plus distributions from equity investees, non-cash equity-based compensation expense, interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation, amortization and impairments, and other expense, less income from equity investments, interest income, income tax benefit, and other income. WES believes that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA provides information useful to investors in assessing its financial condition and results of operations and that Adjusted EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator of a companys ability to incur and service debt, fund capital expenditures and make distributions. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure that WESs management and external users of WESs consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, commercial banks and rating agencies, use to assess the following, among other measures:
| WESs operating performance as compared to other publicly traded partnerships in the midstream energy industry, without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis; |
| the ability of WESs assets to generate cash flow to make distributions; and |
| the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the returns on investment of various investment opportunities. |
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $20.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to a $34.4 million increase in total revenues excluding equity income, a $2.4 million decrease in net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, a $0.9 million decrease in general and administrative expenses excluding non-cash equity-based compensation, and a $0.4 million increase in distributions from equity investees. These amounts were offset by an $11.0 million increase in cost of product, a $6.0 million increase in operation and maintenance expenses, and a $1.3 million increase in property and other tax expense.
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $21.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to a $39.1 million increase in total revenues excluding equity income, a $4.4 million decrease in net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, a $1.0 million increase in distributions from equity investees, and a $0.3 million decrease in general and administrative expenses excluding non-cash equity-based compensation. These amounts were offset by a $10.9 million increase in cost of product, a $10.6 million increase in operation and maintenance expenses, and a $2.2 million increase in property and other tax expense.
Distributable cash flow. WES defines Distributable cash flow as Adjusted EBITDA, plus interest income, less net cash paid for interest expense (including amortization of deferred debt issuance costs originally paid in cash, offset by non-cash capitalized interest), maintenance capital expenditures, and income taxes. WES compares Distributable cash flow to the cash distributions WES expects to pay its unitholders. Using this measure, WESs management can quickly compute the Coverage ratio of distributable cash flow to planned cash distributions. WES believes Distributable cash flow is useful to investors because this measurement is used by many companies, analysts and others in the industry as a performance measurement tool to evaluate WESs operating and financial performance and compare it with the performance of other publicly traded partnerships.
39
Table of Contents
While Distributable cash flow is a measure WES uses to assess its ability to make distributions to its unitholders, it should not be viewed as indicative of the actual amount of cash that WES has available for distributions or that it plans to distribute for a given period.
Distributable cash flow increased by $17.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to a $20.0 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA, and a $3.0 million decrease in maintenance capital expenditures, offset by a $5.5 million increase in net cash paid for interest expense.
Distributable cash flow increased by $14.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to a $21.3 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA, and a $3.3 million decrease in maintenance capital expenditures, offset by a $10.3 million increase in net cash paid for interest expense.
Reconciliation to GAAP measures. Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow are not defined in GAAP. The GAAP measures most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA are net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP and net cash provided by operating activities, and the GAAP measure most directly comparable to Distributable cash flow is net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP. WESs non-GAAP financial measures of Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow should not be considered as alternatives to the GAAP measures of net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP, net cash provided by operating activities or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow have important limitations as analytical tools because they exclude some, but not all, items that affect net income and net cash provided by operating activities. Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of WESs results as reported under GAAP. WESs definitions of Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies in WESs industry, thereby diminishing their utility.
WESs management compensates for the limitations of Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow as analytical tools by reviewing the comparable GAAP measures, understanding the differences between Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable cash flow compared to (as applicable) net income and net cash provided by operating activities, and incorporating this knowledge into its decision-making processes. WES believes that investors benefit from having access to the same financial measures that its management uses in evaluating its operating results.
40
Table of Contents
The following tables present (a) a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA to the GAAP financial measures of net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP and net cash provided by operating activities, and (b) a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure of Distributable cash flow to the GAAP financial measure of net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
thousands | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
$ | 107,646 | $ | 87,639 | $ | 203,575 | $ | 182,319 | ||||||||
Less: |
||||||||||||||||
Distributions from equity investees |
6,026 | 5,578 | 11,032 | 10,019 | ||||||||||||
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense |
824 | 2,924 | 1,701 | 6,990 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
12,654 | 9,560 | 24,465 | 19,141 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
137 | 5,079 | 4,373 | 9,508 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and impairments (1) |
35,857 | 27,084 | 67,681 | 53,496 | ||||||||||||
Other expense (1) |
| 1,665 | | 1,665 | ||||||||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||||||
Equity income, net |
3,724 | 3,335 | 7,704 | 6,948 | ||||||||||||
Interest income, net affiliates |
4,225 | 4,225 | 8,450 | 8,450 | ||||||||||||
Other income (1) (2) |
103 | | 380 | 62 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
$ | 60,200 | $ | 43,309 | $ | 110,857 | $ | 96,960 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Net cash provided by operating activities |
||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
$ | 107,646 | $ | 87,639 | $ | 203,575 | $ | 182,319 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests |
2,499 | 4,945 | 5,345 | 9,843 | ||||||||||||
Interest income (expense), net |
(8,429) | (5,335) | (16,015) | (10,691) | ||||||||||||
Non-cash equity based compensation expense |
54 | (2,004) | (19) | (5,156) | ||||||||||||
Debt-related amortization and other items, net |
566 | 519 | 1,126 | 1,030 | ||||||||||||
Current income tax expense |
(32) | (1,452) | (3,144) | 6,331 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net (2) |
103 | (1,663) | 381 | (1,601) | ||||||||||||
Distributions from equity investees less than (in excess of) equity income, net |
(2,302) | (2,243) | (3,328) | (3,071) | ||||||||||||
Changes in operating working capital: |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable and natural gas imbalance receivable |
(47,875) | (20,241) | (27,121) | 12,586 | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and natural gas imbalance payable |
(20,951) | 3,717 | 336 | (9,948) | ||||||||||||
Other |
3,779 | 3,583 | 3,877 | 4,544 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 35,058 | $ | 67,465 | $ | 165,013 | $ | 186,186 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash flow information of Western Gas Partners, LP |
||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 165,013 | $ | 186,186 | ||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
$ | (1,049,490) | $ | (658,549) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
$ | 538,676 | $ | 503,856 |
(1) | Includes WESs 51% share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, and its 75% share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, of depreciation, amortization and impairments; other expense; and other income attributable to Chipeta. See Note 2Acquisitions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
(2) | Excludes income of $0.4 million and $0.8 million for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to a component of a gas processing agreement accounted for as a capital lease. See Note 2Acquisitions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
41
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
thousands except Coverage ratio | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Distributable cash flow to Net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP and calculation of the Coverage ratio |
||||||||||||||||
Distributable cash flow |
$ | 89,783 | $ | 72,290 | $ | 168,913 | $ | 154,651 | ||||||||
Less: |
||||||||||||||||
Distributions from equity investees |
6,026 | 5,578 | 11,032 | 10,019 | ||||||||||||
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense |
824 | 2,924 | 1,701 | 6,990 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net (non-cash settled) |
| 82 | | 163 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
137 | 5,079 | 4,373 | 9,508 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and impairments (1) |
35,857 | 27,084 | 67,681 | 53,496 | ||||||||||||
Other expense (1) |
| 1,665 | | 1,665 | ||||||||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||||||
Equity income, net |
3,724 | 3,335 | 7,704 | 6,948 | ||||||||||||
Cash paid for maintenance capital expenditures (1) (3) |
6,174 | 9,150 | 12,206 | 15,465 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
3,260 | 946 | 6,441 | 1,603 | ||||||||||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
| | | 72 | ||||||||||||
Other income (1) (2) |
103 | | 380 | 62 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to Western Gas Partners, LP |
$ | 60,200 | $ | 43,309 | $ | 110,857 | $ | 96,960 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Distributions declared (4) |
||||||||||||||||
Limited partners |
$ | 62,794 | $ | 119,553 | ||||||||||||
General partner |
16,521 | 29,905 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 79,315 | $ | 149,458 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Coverage ratio |
1.13 | x | 1.13 | x |
(1) | Includes WESs 51% share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, and its 75% share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, of depreciation, amortization and impairments; other expense; cash paid for maintenance capital expenditures; and other income attributable to Chipeta. See Note 2Acquisitions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
(2) | Excludes income of $0.4 million and $0.8 million for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to a component of a gas processing agreement accounted for as a capital lease. See Note 2Acquisitions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
(3) | Net of a prior period adjustment reclassifying $0.7 million from capital expenditures to operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. |
(4) | Reflects WES distributions of $0.56 and $1.10 per unit declared for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
WESs primary cash requirements are for acquisitions and other capital expenditures, debt service, customary operating expenses, quarterly distributions to its limited partners and general partner, and distributions to its noncontrolling interest owner. WESs sources of liquidity as of June 30, 2013, included cash and cash equivalents, cash flows generated from operations, including interest income on WESs $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko, available borrowing capacity under the WES RCF, and issuances of additional equity or debt securities. WES believes that cash flows generated from these sources will be sufficient to satisfy its short-term working capital requirements and long-term maintenance and expansion capital expenditure requirements. The amount of future distributions to unitholders will depend on its results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors, and will be determined by the board of directors of its general partner on a quarterly basis. Due to WESs cash distribution policy, WES expects to rely on external financing sources, including equity and debt issuances, to fund expansion capital expenditures and future acquisitions. However, to limit interest expense, WES may use operating cash flows to fund expansion capital expenditures or acquisitions, which could result in subsequent borrowings under the WES RCF to pay distributions or fund other short-term working capital requirements.
42
Table of Contents
WES has made cash distributions to its unitholders each quarter since its IPO and has increased its quarterly distribution each quarter since the second quarter of 2009. On July 17, 2013, the board of directors of WES GP declared a cash distribution to WES unitholders of $0.56 per unit, which equates to $79.3 million in the aggregate including incentive distributions. The cash distribution is payable on August 12, 2013, to WES unitholders of record at the close of business on July 31, 2013.
WESs management continuously monitors its leverage position and coordinates its capital expenditure program, quarterly distributions and acquisition strategy with its expected cash flows and projected debt-repayment schedule. WES will continue to evaluate funding alternatives, including additional borrowings and the issuance of debt or equity securities, to secure funds as needed or to refinance outstanding debt balances with longer-term notes. To facilitate a potential debt or equity securities issuance, WES has the ability to sell securities under its shelf registration statements. WESs ability to generate cash flows is subject to a number of factors, some of which are beyond its control. Please read Part II, Item 1ARisk Factors of this Form 10-Q.
Working capital. As of June 30, 2013, WES had $11.0 million of working capital, which it defines as the amount by which current assets exceed current liabilities. Working capital is an indication of liquidity and potential need for short-term funding. Our working-capital requirements are primarily those of WES, which are driven by changes in accounts receivable and accounts payable and factors such as credit extended to, and the timing of collections from, its customers, and the level and timing of its spending for maintenance and expansion activity. As of June 30, 2013, WES had $537.2 million available for borrowing under its $800.0 million RCF. In addition, we have availability under our $30.0 million WGP WCF. See Note 8Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Capital expenditures. WESs business is capital intensive, requiring significant investment to maintain and improve existing facilities or develop new midstream infrastructure. WES categorizes capital expenditures as either of the following:
| maintenance capital expenditures, which include those expenditures required to maintain the existing operating capacity and service capability of WESs assets, such as to replace system components and equipment that have been subject to significant use over time, become obsolete or reached the end of their useful lives, to remain in compliance with regulatory or legal requirements or to complete additional well connections to maintain existing system throughput and related cash flows; or |
| expansion capital expenditures, which include expenditures to construct new midstream infrastructure and those expenditures incurred in order to extend the useful lives of WESs assets, reduce costs, increase revenues or increase system throughput or capacity from current levels, including well connections that increase existing system throughput. |
43
Table of Contents
Capital expenditures in the consolidated statements of cash flows reflect capital expenditures on a cash basis, when payments are made. Capital incurred is presented on an accrual basis. WESs capital expenditures as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows and capital incurred were as follows:
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
thousands | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Acquisitions |
$ | 679,610 | $ | 465,507 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Expansion capital expenditures |
$ | 327,550 | $ | 176,840 | ||||
Maintenance capital expenditures |
12,206 | 16,213 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total capital expenditures (1) |
$ | 339,756 | $ | 193,053 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Capital incurred (2) |
$ | 301,880 | $ | 278,930 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2013, included $6.0 million of capitalized interest. Capital expenditures included the noncontrolling interest owners share of Chipetas capital expenditures, funded by contributions from the noncontrolling interest owners for all periods presented. Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2012, included $44.6 million of pre-acquisition capital expenditures for the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. |
(2) | Capital incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2013, included $6.0 million of capitalized interest. Capital incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, included $8.8 million and $76.3 million, respectively, of pre-acquisition capital incurred for the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition and included the noncontrolling interest owners share of Chipetas capital incurred, funded by contributions from the noncontrolling interest owners. |
Acquisitions included the Mont Belvieu JV acquisition in the second quarter of 2013, the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition and the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition in the first quarter of 2013, and the MGR acquisition in the first quarter of 2012, as discussed in Note 2Acquisitions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, increased by $146.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Expansion capital expenditures increased by $150.7 million (including a $4.4 million increase in capitalized interest), primarily due to an increase of $117.9 million related to the construction of the Brasada and Lancaster gas processing facilities and a $61.1 million increase in expenditures at the Wattenberg and Hilight systems and the Red Desert complex. These increases were partially offset by a $31.1 million decrease at Chipeta. Maintenance capital expenditures decreased by $4.0 million, primarily as a result of decreased expenditures of $4.6 million at the Wattenberg, Haley, and Platte Valley systems and the Red Desert complex, partially offset by a $1.4 million increase at the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest and the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest.
WESs historical cash flow. The following table and discussion present a summary of WESs net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities, investing activities and financing activities:
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
thousands | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 165,013 | $ | 186,186 | ||||
Investing activities |
(1,049,490) | (658,549) | ||||||
Financing activities |
538,676 | 503,856 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (345,801) | $ | 31,493 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013, was $165.0 million, compared to $186.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Operating cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013, decreased primarily due to the unfavorable impact of changes in working capital items, partially offset by higher sales volumes and higher average natural gas prices. Refer to Operating Results within Item 2 of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of WESs results of operations as compared to the prior period.
44
Table of Contents
Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013, included the following:
| $465.5 million of cash paid for the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition; |
| $339.8 million of capital expenditures; |
| $134.5 million of cash paid for the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition; |
| $78.1 million of cash paid for the Mont Belvieu JV acquisition; |
| $12.0 million of cash paid related to a White Cliffs expansion project anticipated to be completed in the first half of 2014; |
| $17.8 million of capital contributions to the Mont Belvieu JV to fund WESs current share of construction costs for the fractionation facilities anticipated to be completed by the first quarter of 2014; and |
| $1.4 million of cash paid for equipment purchases from Anadarko. |
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012, included the following:
| $458.6 million of cash paid for the MGR acquisition; |
| $193.1 million of capital expenditures; and |
| $6.7 million of cash paid for equipment purchases from Anadarko. |
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013, included the following:
| $424.9 million of net proceeds from the WES May 2013 equity offering, $245.0 million of which was used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the WES RCF; |
| $250.0 million of borrowings to fund the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition; |
| $133.5 million of borrowings to fund the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition; |
| $111.5 million of borrowings to fund capital expenditures; and |
| $0.5 million of net proceeds from the issuance of general partner units to WES GP to maintain its 2.0% general partner interest after WES common units were issued in conjunction with the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. |
Net contributions from Anadarko attributable to intercompany balances were $4.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, representing intercompany transactions attributable to the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012, included the following:
| $512.4 million of net proceeds from the WES 2022 Notes offering in June 2012, after underwriting and original issue discounts and offering costs; |
| $299.0 million of borrowings to fund the MGR acquisition; and |
| $216.6 million of net proceeds from the WES June 2012 equity offering. |
45
Table of Contents
Proceeds from the WES 2022 Notes offering were used to repay amounts outstanding under the WES RCF and WESs note payable to Anadarko. Net contributions from Anadarko attributable to intercompany balances were $29.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012, representing intercompany transactions attributable to the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, WES paid $135.8 million and $89.1 million, respectively, of cash distributions to its unitholders. Contributions to Chipeta from noncontrolling interest owners totaled $1.1 million and $21.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, primarily for expansion of the cryogenic units and plant construction. Distributions from Chipeta to noncontrolling interest owners totaled $4.7 million and $10.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing the distributions received as of June 30 of the respective year. Decreases in contributions to and distributions from Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners are also due to WESs August 2012 acquisition of Anadarkos then remaining 24% membership interest in Chipeta.
Debt and credit facilities. As of June 30, 2013, the carrying value of WESs outstanding debt consisted of $673.4 million of the 2022 Notes, $494.9 million of the 2021 Notes and $250.0 million of the WES RCF. See Note 8Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
WES Senior Notes. In June 2012, WES completed the offering of $520.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 at a price to the public of 99.194% of the face amount. In October 2012, WES issued an additional $150.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 at a price to the public of 105.178% of the face amount. The October 2012 notes and the June 2012 notes were issued under the same indenture and are considered a single class of securities, collectively referred to as the 2022 Notes.
In May 2011, WES completed the offering of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2021 (the 2021 Notes) at a price to the public of 98.778% of the face amount.
At June 30, 2013, WES was in compliance with all covenants under the indentures governing the 2021 Notes and the 2022 Notes.
WES note payable to Anadarko. In 2008, WES entered into a five-year $175.0 million term loan agreement with Anadarko. The interest rate was fixed at 2.82% prior to June 2012 when the note payable to Anadarko was repaid in full with proceeds from the June 2012 offering of the 2022 Notes.
WES RCF. As of June 30, 2013, WES had $250.0 million of outstanding borrowings and $12.8 million in outstanding letters of credit issued under the WES RCF. The interest rate was 1.70% and 1.71% at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. WES is required to pay a quarterly facility fee currently ranging from 0.20% to 0.35% of the commitment amount (whether used or unused), based upon WESs senior unsecured debt rating. The facility fee rate was 0.25% at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. At June 30, 2013, WES was in compliance with all covenants under the WES RCF.
The 2022 Notes, the 2021 Notes and obligations under the WES RCF are recourse to WES GP and as of December 31, 2012, WES GP was indemnified by a wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko, Western Gas Resources, Inc. (WGRI), against any claims made against WES GP under the 2022 Notes, the 2021 Notes and/or the WES RCF. In connection with the acquisition of the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest in March 2013, WES GP and another wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko entered into an indemnification agreement (the 2013 Indemnification Agreement) whereby such subsidiary agreed to indemnify WES GP for any recourse liability it may have for WES RCF borrowings, or other debt financing, attributable to the acquisitions of the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest or the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest. As of June 30, 2013, the 2013 Indemnification Agreement applied to such debt financings up to $250.0 million. WES GP and WGRI also amended and restated the existing indemnity agreement between them to reduce the amount for which WGRI would indemnify WES GP by an amount equal to any amounts payable to WES GP under the 2013 Indemnification Agreement.
WGP working capital facility. On November 1, 2012, we entered into a $30.0 million working capital facility with Anadarko as the lender. The facility is available exclusively to fund our working capital borrowings. Borrowings under the facility will mature on November 1, 2017, and will bear interest at London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.50%. The interest rate was 1.70% and 1.71% at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
46
Table of Contents
We are required to reduce all borrowings under the WGP WCF to zero for a period of at least 15 consecutive days during the twelve month period commencing on November 1, 2012, and during the twelve month period commencing on each anniversary thereof. As of June 30, 2013, we had no outstanding borrowings under the WGP WCF. At June 30, 2013, we were in compliance with all covenants under the WGP WCF.
Registered securities. WES may issue an indeterminate amount of common units and various debt securities under its effective shelf registration statements on file with the SEC.
In August 2012, WES filed a registration statement with the SEC authorizing the issuance of up to $125.0 million of WES common units in amounts, at prices and on terms to be determined by market conditions and other factors at the time of the offerings. As of June 30, 2013, WES had not issued any common units under this registration statement.
Credit risk. As stated above, our assets consist solely of ownership interests in WES. Accordingly, we are dependent upon WESs ability to pay cash distributions to us. WES bears credit risk represented by its exposure to non-payment or non-performance by its counterparties, including Anadarko, financial institutions, customers and other parties. Generally, non-payment or non-performance results from a customers inability to satisfy payables to WES for services rendered or volumes owed pursuant to gas imbalance agreements. WES examines and monitors the creditworthiness of third-party customers and may establish credit limits for third-party customers. A substantial portion of WESs throughput, however, comes from producers that have investment-grade ratings.
WES is dependent upon a single producer, Anadarko, for the substantial majority of its natural gas volumes, and WES does not maintain a credit limit with respect to Anadarko. Consequently, WES is subject to the risk of non-payment or late payment by Anadarko for gathering, processing and transportation fees and for proceeds from the sale of residue, NGLs and condensate to Anadarko.
WES expects its exposure to concentrated risk of non-payment or non-performance to continue for as long as it remains substantially dependent on Anadarko for its revenues. Additionally, WES is exposed to credit risk on the note receivable from Anadarko, which was issued concurrently with the closing of its initial public offering. WES is also party to agreements with Anadarko under which Anadarko is required to indemnify WES for certain environmental claims, losses arising from rights-of-way claims, failures to obtain required consents or governmental permits and income taxes with respect to the assets acquired from Anadarko. Finally, WES has entered into various commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko in order to reduce its exposure to commodity price risk and is subject to performance risk thereunder.
WESs ability to make distributions to its unitholders may be adversely impacted if Anadarko becomes unable to perform under the terms of its gathering, processing and transportation agreements, natural gas and NGL purchase agreements, Anadarkos note payable to WES, the WES omnibus agreement, the services and secondment agreement, contribution agreements or the commodity price swap agreements.
WESs contractual obligations include, among other things, a revolving credit facility, other third-party long-term debt, capital obligations related to its expansion projects and various operating leases. Refer to Note 8Debt and Interest Expense and Note 9Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for an update to WESs contractual obligations as of June 30, 2013, including, but not limited to, increases in committed capital.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements. WES does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases. The information pertaining to operating leases required for this item is provided under Note 9Commitments and Contingencies included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
47
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Commodity price risk. Certain of WESs processing services are provided under percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole agreements in which Anadarko is typically responsible for the marketing of the natural gas and NGLs. Under percent-of-proceeds agreements, WES receives a specified percentage of the net proceeds from the sale of natural gas and NGLs. Under keep-whole agreements, WES keeps 100% of the NGLs produced, and the processed natural gas, or value of the gas, is returned to the producer. Since some of the gas is used and removed during processing, WES compensates the producer for this amount of gas by supplying additional gas or by paying an agreed-upon value for the gas utilized.
To mitigate WESs exposure to changes in commodity prices as a result of the purchase and sale of natural gas, condensate or NGLs, WES currently has in place commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko expiring at various times through December 2016. For additional information on the commodity price swap agreements, see Note 5Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
In addition, pursuant to certain of WESs contracts, WES retains and sells drip condensate that is recovered during the gathering of natural gas. As part of this arrangement, WES is required to provide a thermally equivalent volume of natural gas or the cash equivalent thereof to the shipper. Thus, WESs revenues for this portion of WESs contractual arrangement are based on the price received for the drip condensate, and WESs costs for this portion of its contractual arrangement depend on the price of natural gas. Historically, drip condensate sells at a price representing a discount to the price of New York Mercantile Exchange, or NYMEX, West Texas Intermediate crude oil.
We consider WESs exposure to commodity price risk associated with the above-described arrangements to be minimal given the existence of the commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko and the relatively small amount of WESs operating income that is impacted by changes in market prices. Accordingly, WES does not expect a 10% increase or decrease in natural gas or NGL prices would have a material impact on WESs operating income, financial condition or cash flows for the next twelve months, excluding the effect of natural gas imbalances described below.
We also bear a limited degree of commodity price risk through an investment in WES with respect to settlement of WESs natural gas imbalances that arise from differences in gas volumes received into WESs systems and gas volumes delivered by WES to customers, as well as instances where WESs actual liquids recovery or fuel usage varies from the contractually stipulated amounts. Natural gas volumes owed to or by WES that are subject to monthly cash settlement are valued according to the terms of the contract as of the balance sheet dates, and generally reflect market index prices. Other natural gas volumes owed to or by WES are valued at WESs weighted average cost of natural gas as of the balance sheet dates and are settled in-kind. WESs exposure to the impact of changes in commodity prices on outstanding imbalances depends on the timing of settlement of the imbalances.
Interest rate risk. Interest rates during the six months ended June 30, 2013 were low compared to historic rates. As of June 30, 2013, there were no borrowings outstanding under the WGP WCF and WES had $250.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the WES RCF (both of which bear interest at a rate based on LIBOR). If interest rates rise, future financing costs could increase. A 10% change in LIBOR would have resulted in a nominal change in net income and the fair value of the borrowings under the WES RCF.
Additional variable rate debt may be incurred in the future, either under the WES RCF, WGP WCF or other financing sources, including commercial bank borrowings or debt issuances.
48
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our general partner performed an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of June 30, 2013.
Transition Period for Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our most recent annual report filed on March 28, 2013, does not include a report of managements assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the SEC for newly public companies.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2013, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
We are not engaged in any material litigation. WES is not a party to any legal, regulatory or administrative proceedings other than proceedings arising in the ordinary course of its business. WESs management believes that there are no such proceedings for which final disposition could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, cash flows or financial condition, or for which disclosure is otherwise required by Item 103 of Regulation S-K.
Security holders and potential investors in our securities should carefully consider the risk factors under Part I, Item 1A set forth in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, together with all of the other information included in this document, and in our other public filings, press releases, and public discussions with management. Additionally, for a full discussion of the risks associated with Anadarkos business, see Item 1A under Part I in Anadarkos Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, Anadarkos quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and Anadarkos other public filings, press releases, and public discussions with Anadarko management. We have identified these risk factors as important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any written or oral forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf.
WESs construction of new assets may not result in revenue increases and will be subject to regulatory, environmental, political, legal and economic risks, which could adversely affect WESs, and therefore our, results of operations and financial condition.
One of the ways WES intends to grow its business is through the construction of new midstream assets. The construction of additions or modifications to WESs existing systems and the construction of new midstream assets involve numerous regulatory, environmental, political and legal uncertainties that are beyond WESs control. These uncertainties could also affect downstream assets which WES does not own or control, but which are critical to certain of its growth projects. Delays in the completion of new downstream assets, or the unavailability of existing downstream assets, due to environmental, regulatory or political considerations could have an adverse impact on the completion or utilization of WESs growth projects. In addition, construction activities could be subject to state, county and local ordinances that restrict the time, place or manner in which those activities may be conducted. Construction projects may also require the expenditure of significant amounts of capital, and financing may not be available on terms economically acceptable to WES or at all. If WES undertakes these projects, they may not be completed on schedule, at the budgeted cost, or at all. Moreover, WESs revenues may not increase immediately upon the expenditure of funds on a particular project. For instance, if WES expands a pipeline, the construction may occur over an extended period of time, yet WES will not receive any material increases in revenues until the project is completed. Moreover, WES could construct facilities to capture anticipated future growth in production in a region in which such growth does not materialize. Since WES is not engaged in the exploration for and development of natural gas and oil reserves, WES often does not have access to estimates of potential reserves in an area prior to constructing facilities in that area. To the extent WES relies on estimates of future production in its decision to construct additions to its systems, such estimates may prove to be inaccurate as a result of the numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of future production. As a result, new facilities may not be able to attract enough throughput to achieve WESs expected investment return, which could adversely affect WESs, and therefore our, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, WES may be required to obtain new rights-of-way in connection with the construction of additions to its existing assets. WES may be unable to obtain such rights-of-way and may, therefore, be unable to connect new natural gas volumes to its systems or capitalize on other attractive expansion opportunities. Additionally, it may become more expensive for WES to obtain new rights-of-way or to renew existing rights-of-way. If the cost of renewing existing or obtaining new rights-of-way increases, WESs, and therefore our, cash flows could be adversely affected.
49
Table of Contents
Exhibits designated by an asterisk (*) are filed herewith and those designated with asterisks (**) are furnished herewith; all exhibits not so designated are incorporated herein by reference to a prior filing as indicated.
2.1# | Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement by and among Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP, dated as of May 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2008, File No. 001-34046). | |
2.2# | Contribution Agreement, dated as of November 11, 2008, by and among Western Gas Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 13, 2008, File No. 001-34046). | |
2.3# | Contribution Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2009, by and among Western Gas Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, Anadarko Uintah Midstream, LLC, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, WES GP, Inc., Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2009, File No. 001-34046). | |
2.4# | Contribution Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2010 by and among Western Gas Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, Mountain Gas Resources LLC, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, WES GP, Inc., Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2010 File No. 001-34046). | |
2.5# | Contribution Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2010, by and among Western Gas Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, WES GP, Inc., Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2010, File No. 001-34046). | |
2.6# | Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of January 14, 2011, by and among Western Gas Partners, LP, Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC and Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2011 File No. 001-34046). | |
2.7# | Contribution Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2011, by and among Western Gas Resources, Inc., WGR Asset Holding Company LLC, WGR Holdings, LLC, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, WES GP, Inc., Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC and WGR Operating, LP. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2011, File No. 001-34046). | |
2.8# | Contribution Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2013, by and among Anadarko Marcellus Midstream, L.L.C., Western Gas Partners, LP, Western Gas Operating, LLC, WGR Operating, LP, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2013, File No. 001-34046). | |
3.1 | Certificate of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Equity Partners, LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Western Gas Equity Partners, LP filed on November 5, 2012, File No. 333-184763). | |
3.2 | First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Equity Partners, LP, dated as of December 12, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2012, File No. 001-35753). | |
3.3 | Certificate of formation of Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Western Gas Equity Partners, LP Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on November 5, 2012, File No. 333-184763). | |
3.4 | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC, dated as of December 12, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2012, File No. 001-35753). |
50
Table of Contents
3.5 | Certificate of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 15, 2007, File No. 333-146700). | |
3.6 | First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP, dated May 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2008, File No. 001-34046). | |
3.7 | Amendment No. 1 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP dated December 19, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 24, 2008, File No. 001-34046). | |
3.8 | Amendment No. 2 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP, dated as of April 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 20, 2009, File No. 001-34046). | |
3.9 | Amendment No. 3 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP dated July 22, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2009, File No. 001-34046). | |
3.10 | Amendment No. 4 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP dated January 29, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2010, File No. 001-34046). | |
3.11 | Amendment No. 5 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP, dated August 2, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2010, File No. 001-34046). | |
3.12 | Amendment No. 6 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP, dated July 8, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2011, File No. 001-34046). | |
3.13 | Amendment No. 7 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP, dated January 13, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 17, 2012, File No. 001-34046). | |
3.14 | Amendment No. 8 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP, dated August 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 2, 2012, File No. 001-34046). | |
3.15 | Amendment No. 9 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP, dated December 12, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2012, File No. 001-34046). | |
3.16 | Amendment No. 10 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Western Gas Partners, LP, dated March 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2013, File No. 001-34046). | |
3.17 | Certificate of Formation of Western Gas Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 15, 2007, File No. 333-146700). | |
3.18 | Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Western Gas Holdings, LLC, dated December 12, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2012, File No. 001-34046). | |
4.1 | Specimen Unit Certificate for the Common Units (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 13, 2008, File No. 001-34046). | |
4.2 | Indenture, dated as of May 18, 2011, among Western Gas Partners, LP, as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 18, 2011, File No. 001-34046). | |
4.3 | First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 18, 2011, among Western Gas Partners, LP, as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 18, 2011, File No. 001-34046). |
51
Table of Contents
4.4 | Form of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 18, 2011, File No. 001-34046). | |
4.5 | Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 28, 2012, among Western Gas Partners, LP, as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 28, 2012, File No. 001-34046). | |
4.6 | Form of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 28, 2012, File No. 001-34046). | |
10.1 | Assignment of Indemnification Agreement, dated April 1, 2013, between Anadarko USH2 LLC and Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Western Gas Partners, LPs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 1, 2013, File No. 001-34046). | |
31.1* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1** | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
# | Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule to the SEC upon request. | |
101.INS** | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH** | XBRL Schema Document | |
101.CAL** | XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF** | XBRL Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB** | XBRL Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE** | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document |
52
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP | ||||
August 1, 2013 | ||||
/s/ Donald R. Sinclair | ||||
Donald R. Sinclair | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC | ||||
(as general partner of Western Gas Equity Partners, LP) | ||||
August 1, 2013 | ||||
/s/ Benjamin M. Fink | ||||
Benjamin M. Fink | ||||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ||||
Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC | ||||
(as general partner of Western Gas Equity Partners, LP) |
53