Western Midstream Partners, LP - Annual Report: 2019 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
Or
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP |
WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
Commission file number: | State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization: | I.R.S. Employer Identification No.: | |
Western Midstream Partners, LP | 001-35753 | Delaware | 46-0967367 |
Western Midstream Operating, LP | 001-34046 | Delaware | 26-1075808 |
Address of principal executive offices: | Zip Code: | Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: | ||||
Western Midstream Partners, LP | 1201 Lake Robbins Drive | The Woodlands, | Texas | 77380 | (832) | 636-6000 |
Western Midstream Operating, LP | 1201 Lake Robbins Drive | The Woodlands, | Texas | 77380 | (832) | 636-6000 |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Trading symbol | Name of exchange on which registered | |
Western Midstream Partners, LP | Common units | WES | New York Stock Exchange |
Western Midstream Operating, LP | None | None | None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Western Midstream Partners, LP | Yes | þ | No | ¨ |
Western Midstream Operating, LP | Yes | þ | No | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Western Midstream Partners, LP | Yes | ¨ | No | þ |
Western Midstream Operating, LP | Yes | ¨ | No | þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Western Midstream Partners, LP | Yes | þ | No | ¨ |
Western Midstream Operating, LP | Yes | þ | No | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Western Midstream Partners, LP | Yes | þ | No | ¨ |
Western Midstream Operating, LP | Yes | þ | No | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Western Midstream Partners, LP | Large Accelerated Filer | Accelerated Filer | Non-accelerated Filer | Smaller Reporting Company | Emerging Growth Company |
þ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |
Western Midstream Operating, LP | Large Accelerated Filer | Accelerated Filer | Non-accelerated Filer | Smaller Reporting Company | Emerging Growth Company |
☐ | ☐ | þ | ☐ | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Western Midstream Partners, LP | ¨ |
Western Midstream Operating, LP | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Western Midstream Partners, LP | Yes | ☐ | No | þ |
Western Midstream Operating, LP | Yes | ☐ | No | þ |
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common units representing limited partner interests held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 28, 2019, based on the closing price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
Western Midstream Partners, LP | $6.2 billion |
Western Midstream Operating, LP | None |
Common units outstanding as of February 24, 2020:
Western Midstream Partners, LP | 443,971,409 |
Western Midstream Operating, LP | None |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
FILING FORMAT
This annual report on Form 10-K is a combined report being filed by two separate registrants: Western Midstream Partners, LP and Western Midstream Operating, LP. Western Midstream Operating, LP is a consolidated subsidiary of Western Midstream Partners, LP that has publicly traded debt, but does not have any publicly traded equity securities. Information contained herein related to any individual registrant is filed by such registrant solely on its own behalf. Each registrant makes no representation as to information relating exclusively to the other registrant.
Part II, Item 8 of this annual report includes separate financial statements (i.e., consolidated statements of operations, consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital, and consolidated statements of cash flows) for Western Midstream Partners, LP and Western Midstream Operating, LP. The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which are included under Part II, Item 8 of this annual report, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which is included under Part II, Item 7 of this annual report, are presented on a combined basis for each registrant, with any material differences between the registrants disclosed separately.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item | Page | |
1 and 2. | ||
1A. | ||
1B. | ||
3. | ||
4. | ||
5. | ||
6. | ||
7. | ||
7A. | ||
8. | ||
9. | ||
9A. | ||
9B. |
3
Item | Page | |
10. | ||
11. | ||
12. | ||
13. | ||
14. | ||
15. | ||
16. |
4
COMMONLY USED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “WES,” “the Partnership,” or “Western Midstream Partners, LP” refer to Western Midstream Partners, LP (formerly Western Gas Equity Partners, LP) and its subsidiaries. As used in this Form 10-K, the terms and definitions below have the following meanings:
Additional DBJV System Interest: The additional 50% interest in the DBJV system acquired from a third party in March 2017.
AESC: Anadarko Energy Services Company, a subsidiary of Occidental.
Affiliates: Occidental and the Partnership’s equity interests in Fort Union, White Cliffs, Rendezvous, the Mont Belvieu JV, TEP, TEG, FRP, Whitethorn LLC, Cactus II, Saddlehorn, Panola, Mi Vida, Ranch Westex, and Red Bluff Express.
AMA: The Anadarko Midstream Assets, which are comprised of the Wattenberg processing plant, Wamsutter pipeline, DJ Basin oil system, DBM oil system, APC water systems, the 20% interest in Saddlehorn, the 15% interest in Panola, the 50% interest in Mi Vida, and the 50% interest in Ranch Westex.
AMH: APC Midstream Holdings, LLC.
Anadarko or APC: Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries, excluding our general partner, which became a wholly owned subsidiary of Occidental upon closing of the Occidental Merger on August 8, 2019.
Barrel or Bbl: 42 U.S. gallons measured at 60 degrees Fahrenheit.
Bbls/d: Barrels per day.
Board of Directors or Board: The board of directors of WES’s general partner.
Btu: British thermal unit; the approximate amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit.
Cactus II: Cactus II Pipeline LLC.
Chipeta: Chipeta Processing, LLC.
Chipeta LLC agreement: Chipeta’s limited liability company agreement, as amended and restated as of July 23, 2009.
Condensate: A natural-gas liquid with a low vapor pressure compared to drip condensate, mainly composed of propane, butane, pentane, and heavier hydrocarbon fractions.
COSF: Centralized oil stabilization facility.
Cryogenic: The process by which liquefied gases are used to bring natural-gas volumes to very low temperatures (below approximately -238 degrees Fahrenheit) to separate natural-gas liquids from natural gas. Through cryogenic processing, more natural-gas liquids are extracted as compared to traditional refrigeration methods.
DBM: Delaware Basin Midstream, LLC.
DBM water systems: The produced-water gathering and disposal systems in West Texas, including the APC water systems acquired as part of the acquisition of AMA.
December 2019 Agreements: Certain agreements entered into on December 31, 2019, including (i) agreements between the Partnership and certain of its subsidiaries, including WES Operating and WES Operating GP, and Occidental and/or certain of its subsidiaries, including Anadarko, and (ii) amendments to WES Operating’s debt agreements. For a description of the December 2019 Agreements, see Executive Summary under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
5
Delivery point: The point where hydrocarbons are delivered by a processor or transporter to a producer, shipper, or purchaser, typically the inlet at the interconnection between the gathering or processing system and the facilities of a third-party processor or transporter.
DJ Basin complex: The Platte Valley system, Wattenberg system, Lancaster plant, Latham plant, and Wattenberg processing plant (acquired as part of the acquisition of AMA).
Drip condensate: Heavier hydrocarbon liquids that fall out of the natural-gas stream and are recovered in the gathering system without processing.
Dry gas: A gas primarily composed of methane and ethane where heavy hydrocarbons and water either do not exist or have been removed through processing.
EBITDA: Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. For a definition of “Adjusted EBITDA,” see How We Evaluate Our Operations under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
End-use markets: The ultimate users/consumers of transported energy products.
Equity-investment throughput: Our share of average throughput from investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
Exchange Act: The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exchange Agreement: That certain Exchange Agreement, dated December 31, 2019, by and among WGRI, the general partner, and WES, pursuant to which (i) WGRI exchanged WES common units for the issuance of a 2.0% general partner interest in WES to the general partner and (ii) WES canceled the non-economic general partner interest in WES.
FERC: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Fort Union: Fort Union Gas Gathering, LLC.
Fractionation: The process of applying various levels of high pressure and low temperature to separate a stream of natural-gas liquids into ethane, propane, normal butane, isobutane, and natural gasoline for end-use sale.
FRP: Front Range Pipeline LLC.
GAAP: Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
General partner: Western Midstream Holdings, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership.
Gpm: Gallons per minute, when used in the context of amine-treating capacity.
Hydraulic fracturing: The high-pressure injection of fluids into the wellbore to create fractures in rock formations, stimulating the production of oil or gas.
IDRs: Incentive distribution rights.
Imbalance: Imbalances result from (i) differences between gas and NGLs volumes nominated by customers and gas and NGLs volumes received from those customers and (ii) differences between gas and NGLs volumes received from customers and gas and NGLs volumes delivered to those customers.
IPO: Initial public offering.
Joule-Thompson (JT): A type of processing plant that uses the Joule-Thompson effect to cool natural gas by expanding the gas from a higher pressure to a lower pressure, which reduces the temperature.
LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate.
Marcellus Interest: The 33.75% interest in the Larry’s Creek, Seely, and Warrensville gas-gathering systems and related facilities located in northern Pennsylvania.
6
MBbls/d: Thousand barrels per day.
Mcf: Thousand cubic feet.
Merger: The merger of Clarity Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, with and into WES Operating, with WES Operating continuing as the surviving entity and a subsidiary of the Partnership, which closed on February 28, 2019.
Merger Agreement: The Contribution Agreement and Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated November 7, 2018, by and among the Partnership, WES Operating, Anadarko, and certain of their affiliates, pursuant to which the parties thereto agreed to effect the Merger and certain other transactions.
MGR: Mountain Gas Resources, LLC.
MGR assets: The Red Desert complex and the Granger straddle plant.
MIGC: MIGC, LLC.
Mi Vida: Mi Vida JV LLC.
MLP: Master limited partnership.
MMBtu: Million British thermal units.
MMcf: Million cubic feet.
MMcf/d: Million cubic feet per day.
Mont Belvieu JV: Enterprise EF78 LLC.
Natural-gas liquid(s) or NGL(s): The combination of ethane, propane, normal butane, isobutane, and natural gasolines that, when removed from natural gas, become liquid under various levels of pressure and temperature.
Non-Operated Marcellus Interest: The 33.75% interest in the Liberty and Rome gas-gathering systems and related facilities located in northern Pennsylvania that was transferred to a third party in March 2017 pursuant to the Property Exchange.
NYSE: New York Stock Exchange.
NYMEX: New York Mercantile Exchange.
Occidental: Occidental Petroleum Corporation and, as the context requires, its subsidiaries, excluding our general partner.
Occidental Merger: Occidental’s acquisition by merger of Anadarko pursuant to the Occidental Merger Agreement, which closed on August 8, 2019.
Occidental Merger Agreement: Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 9, 2019, by and among Occidental, Baseball Merger Sub 1, Inc., and Anadarko.
OTTCO: Overland Trail Transmission, LLC.
Panola: Panola Pipeline Company, LLC.
Play: A group of gas or oil fields that contain known or potential commercial amounts of petroleum and/or natural gas.
Produced water: Byproduct associated with the production of crude oil and natural gas that often contains a number of dissolved solids and other materials found in oil and gas reservoirs.
7
Property Exchange: The acquisition of the Additional DBJV System Interest from a third party in exchange for the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and $155.0 million of cash consideration, as further described in our Forms 8-K filed with the SEC on February 9, 2017, and March 23, 2017.
Ranch Westex: Ranch Westex JV LLC.
Receipt point: The point where hydrocarbons are received by or into a gathering system, processing facility, or transportation pipeline.
RCF: WES Operating’s $2.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility that matures in February 2025.
Red Bluff Express: Red Bluff Express Pipeline, LLC.
Red Desert complex: The Patrick Draw processing plant, the Red Desert processing plant, associated gathering lines, and related facilities.
Refrigeration: A method of processing natural gas by reducing the gas temperature with the use of an external refrigeration system.
Rendezvous: Rendezvous Gas Services, LLC.
Residue: The natural gas remaining after the unprocessed natural-gas stream has been processed or treated.
ROTF: Regional oil treating facility.
Saddlehorn: Saddlehorn Pipeline Company, LLC.
SEC: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Services Agreement: That certain amended and restated Services, Secondment, and Employee Transfer Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2019, by and among Occidental, Anadarko, and WES Operating GP.
Springfield system: The Springfield gas-gathering system and Springfield oil-gathering system.
Stabilization: The process to reduce the volatility of a liquid hydrocarbon stream by separating very light hydrocarbon gases, methane and ethane in particular, from heavier hydrocarbon components. This process reduces the volatility of the liquids during transportation and storage.
Tailgate: The point at which processed natural gas and/or natural-gas liquids leave a processing facility for end-use markets.
TEFR Interests: The interests in TEP, TEG, and FRP.
TEG: Texas Express Gathering LLC.
TEP: Texas Express Pipeline LLC.
Term loan facility: WES Operating’s senior unsecured credit facility entered into in connection with the Merger.
Wellhead: The point at which the hydrocarbons and water exit the ground.
WES Operating: Western Midstream Operating, LP, formerly known as Western Gas Partners, LP, and its subsidiaries.
WES Operating GP: Western Midstream Operating GP, LLC, the general partner of WES Operating.
West Texas complex: The DBM complex and DBJV and Haley systems, all of which were combined into a single complex effective January 1, 2018.
WGP RCF: The senior secured revolving credit facility of Western Midstream Partners, LP (formerly Western Gas Equity Partners, LP) that matured in March 2019.
8
WGRI: Western Gas Resources, Inc, a subsidiary of Occidental.
White Cliffs: White Cliffs Pipeline, LLC.
Whitethorn LLC: Whitethorn Pipeline Company LLC.
9
PART I
Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties
GENERAL OVERVIEW
WES and WES Operating. WES is a Delaware master limited partnership formed in September 2012. Our common units are publicly traded on the NYSE under the symbol “WES.” Our general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of Occidental. WES Operating is a Delaware limited partnership formed by Anadarko in 2007 to acquire, own, develop, and operate midstream assets. WES owns, directly and indirectly, a 98.0% limited partner interest in WES Operating, and directly owns all of the outstanding equity interests of WES Operating GP, which holds the entire non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating.
We are engaged in the business of gathering, compressing, treating, processing, and transporting natural gas; gathering, stabilizing, and transporting condensate, NGLs, and crude oil; and gathering and disposing of produced water. In our capacity as a natural-gas processor, we also buy and sell natural gas, NGLs, and condensate on behalf of ourselves and as an agent for our customers under certain contracts. We provide the above-described midstream services for Occidental and third-party customers.
December 2019 Agreements. On December 31, 2019, WES and certain of its subsidiaries, including WES Operating and WES Operating GP, entered into agreements with Occidental and/or certain of its subsidiaries, including Anadarko. WES Operating also entered into amendments to its debt agreements. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
Merger transactions. On February 28, 2019, WES, WES Operating, Anadarko, and certain of their affiliates completed the Merger. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
Occidental Merger. On August 8, 2019, Anadarko, the indirect general partner and majority unitholder of WES, was acquired by Occidental pursuant to the Occidental Merger.
Available information. We electronically file our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and other documents with the SEC under the Exchange Act. From time to time, we may also file registration and related statements with the SEC pertaining to equity or debt offerings.
We provide access free of charge to all of these SEC filings, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing or furnishing such materials with the SEC, on our website located at www.westernmidstream.com. The public may also obtain such reports from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics for our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and the charters of the Audit Committee and the Special Committee of our Board of Directors are also available on our website. We will also provide, free of charge, a copy of any of our governance documents listed above upon written request to our general partner’s corporate secretary at our principal executive office. Our principal executive office is located at 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, TX 77380-1046. Our telephone number is 832-636-6000.
10
BASIS OF PRESENTATION FOR ACQUIRED ASSETS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Acquisitions and divestitures. In January 2019, we acquired a 30% interest in Red Bluff Express, and in February 2019, WES Operating acquired AMA. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
Presentation of the Partnership’s assets. Our assets include assets owned and ownership interests accounted for by us under the equity method of accounting, through our 98% partnership interest in WES Operating, as of December 31, 2019 (see Note 10—Equity Investments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). We also own and control the entire non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating GP, and our general partner is owned by Occidental; therefore, prior asset acquisitions from Anadarko were classified as transfers of net assets between entities under common control. As such, assets acquired from Anadarko initially were recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value, which did not equate to the total acquisition price paid by us. Further, subsequent to asset acquisitions from Anadarko, we were required to recast our financial statements to include the activities of acquired assets from the date of common control.
For reporting periods that required recast, the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the acquisition of assets from Anadarko were prepared from Anadarko’s historical cost-basis accounts and may not be necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if we had owned the assets during the periods reported. For ease of reference, we refer to the historical financial results of the Partnership’s assets prior to the acquisitions from Anadarko as being “our” historical financial results.
ASSETS AND AREAS OF OPERATION
![wesus2019.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001423902/000142390220000019/wesus2019.jpg)
11
As of December 31, 2019, our assets and investments consisted of the following:
Wholly Owned and Operated | Operated Interests | Non-Operated Interests | Equity Interests | |||||||||
Gathering systems (1) | 17 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||
Treating facilities | 37 | 3 | — | 3 | ||||||||
Natural-gas processing plants/trains | 25 | 3 | — | 5 | ||||||||
NGLs pipelines | 2 | — | — | 4 | ||||||||
Natural-gas pipelines | 5 | — | — | 1 | ||||||||
Crude-oil pipelines | 3 | 1 | — | 3 |
(1) | Includes the DBM water systems. |
These assets and investments are located in the Rocky Mountains (Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming), North-central Pennsylvania, Texas, and New Mexico. The following table provides information regarding our assets by geographic region, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, excluding Latham Train II at the DJ Basin complex and Loving ROTF Trains III and IV at the DBM oil system, which currently are under construction in Colorado and Texas, respectively (see Assets Under Development within these Items 1 and 2):
Area | Asset Type | Miles of Pipeline (1) | Approximate Number of Active Receipt Points (1) | Compression (HP) (1) (2) | Processing or Treating Capacity (MMcf/d) (1) | Processing, Treating, or Disposal Capacity (MBbls/d) (1) | Average Gathering, Processing, Treating, and Transportation Throughput (MMcf/d) (3) | Average Gathering, Treating, Transportation, and Disposal Throughput (MBbls/d) (3) | |||||||||||||||
Rocky Mountains | Gathering, Processing, and Treating | 7,198 | 3,463 | 617,150 | 3,720 | 194 | 2,323 | 118 | |||||||||||||||
Transportation | 2,199 | 31 | — | — | — | 87 | 60 | ||||||||||||||||
Texas / New Mexico | Gathering, Processing, Treating, and Disposal | 3,838 | 2,040 | 774,334 | 1,825 | 1,386 | 1,765 | 792 | |||||||||||||||
Transportation | 2,438 | 38 | — | — | — | 142 | 249 | ||||||||||||||||
North-central Pennsylvania | Gathering | 146 | 59 | 9,660 | — | — | 106 | — | |||||||||||||||
Total | 15,819 | 5,631 | 1,401,144 | 5,545 | 1,580 | 4,423 | 1,219 |
(1) | All system metrics are presented on a gross basis and include owned, rented, and leased compressors at certain facilities. Includes horsepower associated with liquid pump stations. Includes bypass capacity at the DJ Basin and West Texas complexes. |
(2) | Excludes compression horsepower for transportation. |
(3) | Includes throughput for all assets owned and ownership interests accounted for by us under the equity method of accounting. For further details see Properties below. |
Our operations are organized into a single operating segment that engages in gathering, compressing, treating, processing, and transporting natural gas; gathering, stabilizing, and transporting condensate, NGLs, and crude oil; and gathering and disposing of produced water. We provide the above-described midstream services for Occidental and third-party customers in the United States. See Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for disclosure of revenues, operating income (loss), and total assets for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.
12
STRATEGY
Our primary business objective is to create long-term value for our unitholders through continued delivery of high returns and per-unit cash distributions over time. To accomplish this objective, we intend to execute the following strategy:
• | Capitalizing on organic growth opportunities. We expect to grow certain of our systems organically over time by meeting our customers’ midstream service needs that arise from drilling activity in our areas of operation. We continually evaluate economically attractive organic expansion opportunities in existing or new areas of operation that allow us to leverage our infrastructure, operating expertise, and customer relationships to meet new or increased demand of our services. |
• | Increasing third-party volumes to our systems. We continue to actively market our midstream services to, and pursue strategic relationships with, third-party customers to attract additional volumes and/or expansion opportunities. |
• | Controlling our operating, capital, and administrative costs. We continue to optimize and maximize the operability of our existing assets to realize cost and capital savings. As a result of the recent transformation of our workforce that historically maintained dual upstream and midstream responsibilities into a solely midstream-focused organization, we believe that we will drive operational, capital, and administrative cost efficiencies throughout the organization. |
• | Maintaining investment grade metrics. We intend to operate with leverage metrics and distribution coverage levels that are consistent with other investment-grade credits in our sector. Maintaining leverage ratios that are within the industry-standard investment-grade credit metrics positions us to pursue strategic acquisitions and to fund large growth projects at a lower cost of capital, which enhances our accretion and overall return. |
• | Managing commodity-price exposure. We intend to continue limiting our direct exposure to commodity-price changes and promote cash-flow stability by pursuing fee-based contract structures designed to mitigate direct exposure to commodity prices. |
13
COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS
We believe that we are well positioned to successfully execute our strategy and achieve our primary business objective because of the following competitive strengths:
• | Substantial presence in basins with historically strong producer economics. Certain of our systems are in areas, such as the Delaware and DJ Basins, which historically have seen robust producer activity and are considered to have some of the most favorable producer returns for onshore North America. Our assets in these areas are capable of servicing hydrocarbon production that contains natural gas, crude oil, condensate, and NGLs. Our systems in the Delaware Basin also include significant produced-water takeaway capacity, which positions us as a full-service midstream provider in the basin. |
• | Well-positioned and well-maintained assets. We believe that our asset portfolio, located in geographically diverse areas of operation, provides us with opportunities to expand and attract additional volumes to our systems from multiple productive reservoirs. Moreover, our portfolio consists of high-quality, well-maintained assets for which we have implemented modern processing, treating, measurement, and operating technologies. |
• | Commodity-price and volumetric-risk mitigation. We believe a substantial majority of our cash flows are protected from direct exposure to commodity-price volatility, as 93% of our wellhead natural-gas volume (excluding equity investments) and 100% of our crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water throughput (excluding equity investments) were serviced under fee-based contracts for the year ended December 31, 2019. In addition, we mitigate volumetric risk by entering into contracts with cost-of-service structures and/or minimum-volume commitments. For the year ended December 31, 2019, 65% of our natural-gas throughput and 78% of our crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water throughput were supported by either minimum-volume commitments with associated deficiency payments or cost-of-service commitments. |
• | Affiliation with Occidental. We believe Occidental is motivated to promote and support the successful execution of our business plan. We continue leveraging our long-standing relationship with Occidental by sizing and planning growth initiatives in a manner that highlights the strength of our asset portfolio vis a vis Occidental’s upstream development plans. Continuing our relationship with Occidental enables us to pursue more capital-efficient projects that enhance the overall value of our business. See WES and WES Operating’s Relationship with Occidental Petroleum Corporation below. |
• | Liquidity to pursue expansion and acquisition opportunities. We believe our operating cash flows, borrowing capacity, long-dated debt maturity profile, long-term relationships, and reasonable access to capital markets provide us with the liquidity to competitively pursue acquisition and expansion opportunities and to execute our strategy across capital market cycles. As of December 31, 2019, there was $1.6 billion in available borrowing capacity under the RCF. |
We plan to effectively leverage our competitive strengths to successfully implement our business strategy. However, our business involves numerous risks and uncertainties that may prevent us from achieving our primary business objective. For a more complete description of the risks associated with our business, read Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K.
14
WES AND WES OPERATING’S RELATIONSHIP WITH OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Our operations and activities are managed by our general partner, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Occidental. Occidental is among the largest independent oil and gas exploration and production companies in the world. Occidental’s upstream oil and gas business explores for, develops, and produces crude oil and condensate, NGLs, and natural gas.
We believe that one of our principal strengths is our relationship with Occidental, and that Occidental, through its direct economic interest in us, will continue to be motivated to promote and support the successful execution of our business plan.
As of December 31, 2019, Occidental held (i) 242,136,976 of our common units, representing a 53.4% limited partner interest in us, (ii) through its ownership of the general partner, 9,060,641 general partner units, representing a 2.0% general partner interest in us, and (iii) a 2.0% limited partner interest in WES Operating through its ownership of WGR Asset Holding Company LLC (“WGRAH”), which is reflected as a noncontrolling interest within the consolidated financial statements.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, production owned or controlled by Occidental represented 38% of our throughput for natural-gas assets (excluding equity-investment throughput) and 83% of our throughput for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets (excluding equity-investment throughput). In addition, Occidental supports our operations by providing dedications and/or minimum-volume commitments.
Prior to December 31, 2019, we had an omnibus agreement with Occidental and our general partner that governed (i) our obligation to reimburse Occidental for expenses incurred or payments made on our behalf in connection with Occidental’s provision of general and administrative services provided to us, including certain public company expenses and general and administrative expenses; (ii) our obligation to pay Occidental, in quarterly installments, an administrative services fee of $250,000 per year, which was subject to an annual increase pursuant to the omnibus agreement; and (iii) our obligation to reimburse Occidental for all insurance coverage expenses it incurred or payments it made on our behalf. In addition, WES Operating had a separate omnibus agreement with Occidental and WES Operating GP that governed its relationship with Occidental regarding certain reimbursement and indemnification matters. The WES and WES Operating omnibus agreements were terminated in connection with the execution of the December 2019 Agreements. Pursuant to the Services Agreement entered into as part of the December 2019 Agreements, Occidental (i) seconds certain personnel employed by Occidental to WES Operating GP, in exchange for which WES Operating GP pays a monthly secondment and shared services fee to Occidental equivalent to the direct cost of the seconded employees and (ii) continues to provide certain administrative and operational services to us for up to a two-year transition period.
Although we believe our relationship with Occidental enables us to pursue more capital-efficient projects that enhance the overall value of our business, it is also a source of potential conflicts. For example, Occidental is not restricted from competing with us. See Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence under Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K for more information.
15
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
The midstream industry is the link between the exploration for and production of natural gas, NGLs, and crude oil and the delivery of these hydrocarbon components to end-use markets. Operators within this industry create value at various stages along the midstream value chain by gathering production from producers at the wellhead or production facility, separating the produced hydrocarbons into various components, and delivering these components to end-use markets, and where applicable, gathering and disposing of produced water.
The following diagram illustrates the primary groups of assets found along the midstream value chain:
![industryoverview2019.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001423902/000142390220000019/industryoverview2019.jpg)
Natural-Gas Midstream Services
Midstream companies provide services with respect to natural gas that are generally classified into the categories described below.
• | Gathering. At the initial stages of the midstream value chain, a network of typically smaller diameter pipelines known as gathering systems directly connect to wellheads or production facilities in the area. These gathering systems transport raw, or untreated, natural gas to a central location for treating and processing, if necessary. A large gathering system may involve thousands of miles of gathering lines connected to thousands of wells. Gathering systems are typically designed to be highly flexible to allow gathering of natural gas at different pressures and scalable to allow gathering of additional production without significant incremental capital expenditures. |
• | Stabilization. Stabilization is a process that separates the heavier hydrocarbons (which are also valuable commodities) that are sometimes found in natural gas, typically referred to as “liquids-rich” natural gas, from the lighter components by using a distillation process, adding heat, or by reducing the pressure and allowing the more volatile components to flash from the liquid phase to the gas phase. |
• | Compression. Natural-gas compression is a mechanical process in which a volume of natural gas at a given pressure is compressed to a desired higher pressure, which allows the natural gas to be gathered more efficiently and delivered into a higher pressure system, processing plant, or pipeline. Field compression is typically used to allow a gathering system to operate at a lower pressure or provide sufficient discharge pressure to deliver natural gas into a higher pressure system. Since wells produce at progressively lower field pressures as they deplete, field compression is needed to maintain throughput across the gathering system. |
16
• | Treating and dehydration. To the extent that gathered natural gas contains water vapor or contaminants, such as carbon dioxide or hydrogen sulfide, it is dehydrated to remove the saturated water and treated to separate the carbon dioxide or hydrogen sulfide from the gas stream. |
• | Processing. The principal components of natural gas are methane and ethane, but often the natural gas also contains varying amounts of heavier NGLs and contaminants, such as water and carbon dioxide, sulfur compounds, nitrogen, or helium. Natural gas is processed to remove unwanted contaminants that would interfere with pipeline transportation or use of the natural gas and to separate those hydrocarbon liquids from the gas that have higher value as NGLs. The removal and separation of individual hydrocarbons through processing is possible due to differences in molecular weight, boiling point, vapor pressure, and other physical characteristics. |
• | Fractionation. Fractionation is the process of applying various levels of higher pressure and lower temperature to separate a stream of NGLs into ethane, propane, normal butane, isobutane, and natural gasoline for end-use sale. |
• | Storage, transportation, and marketing. Once the raw natural gas has been treated or processed and the raw NGL mix has been fractionated into individual NGL components, the natural gas and NGL components are stored, transported, and marketed to end-use markets. Each pipeline system typically has storage capacity located throughout the pipeline network or at major market centers to better accommodate seasonal demand and daily supply-demand shifts. We do not currently offer storage services. |
Crude-Oil Midstream Services
Midstream companies provide services with respect to crude oil that are generally classified into the categories described below.
• | Gathering. Crude-oil gathering assets provide the link between crude-oil production gathered at the well site or nearby collection points and crude-oil terminals, storage facilities, long-haul crude-oil pipelines, and refineries. Crude-oil gathering assets generally consist of a network of small-diameter pipelines that are connected directly to the well site or central receipt points and deliver into large-diameter trunk lines. To the extent there are not enough volumes to justify construction of or connection to a pipeline system, crude oil can also be trucked from a well site to a central collection point. |
• | Stabilization. Crude-oil stabilization assets process crude oil to meet downstream vapor pressure specifications. Crude-oil delivery points, including crude-oil terminals, storage facilities, long-haul crude-oil pipelines, and refineries, often have specific requirements for vapor pressure and temperature, and for the amount of sediment and water that can be contained in any crude oil delivered to them. |
Produced-Water Midstream Services
The services provided by us and other midstream companies with respect to produced water are generally classified into the categories described below.
• | Gathering. Produced water often accounts for the largest byproduct stream associated with the onshore production of crude oil and natural gas. Produced-water gathering assets provide the link between well sites or nearby collection points and disposal facilities. |
• | Disposal. As a natural byproduct of crude-oil and natural-gas production, produced water must be recycled or disposed of in order to maintain production. Produced-water disposal systems remove hydrocarbon products and other sediments from the produced water and re-inject the produced water utilizing permitted disposal wells in compliance with applicable regulations. |
17
Contractual Arrangements
Midstream services, other than transportation, are usually provided under contractual arrangements that vary in terms of exposure to commodity-price risk. Three typical contract types, or combinations thereof, include the following:
• | Fee-based. Under fee-based arrangements, the service provider typically receives a fee for each unit of (i) natural gas, NGLs, or crude-oil gathered, treated, processed, and/or transported, or (ii) produced water gathered and disposed of, at its facilities. As a result, the per-unit price received by the service provider does not vary with commodity-price changes, thereby minimizing the service provider’s direct commodity-price risk exposure. |
• | Percent-of-proceeds, percent-of-value, or percent-of-liquids. Percent-of-proceeds, percent-of-value, or percent-of-liquids arrangements may be used for gathering and processing services. Under these arrangements, the service provider typically remits to the producers either a percentage of the proceeds from the sale of residue gas and/or NGLs or a percentage of the actual residue gas and/or NGLs at the tailgate. These types of arrangements expose the service provider to commodity-price risk, as the revenues from the contracts directly correlate with the fluctuating price of natural gas and/or NGLs. |
• | Keep-whole. Keep-whole arrangements may be used for processing services. Under these arrangements, a customer provides liquids-rich gas volumes to the service provider for processing. The service provider is obligated to return the equivalent gas volumes to the customer subsequent to processing. Due to the use and loss of volumes in processing, the service provider must purchase additional volumes to compensate the customer. In these arrangements, the service provider receives all or a portion of the NGLs produced in consideration for the service provided. These types of arrangements expose the service provider to commodity-price exposure associated with the cost of purchased keep-whole volumes and the sales value of the retained NGLs. |
See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding recognition of revenue under our contracts.
18
PROPERTIES
The following sections describe in more detail the services provided by our assets in our areas of operation as of December 31, 2019.
GATHERING, PROCESSING, AND TREATING
Overview - Rocky Mountains - Colorado and Utah
Location | Asset | Type | Processing / Treating Plants | Processing / Treating Capacity (MMcf/d) (1) | Processing / Treating Capacity (MBbls/d) | Compressors | Compression Horsepower | Gathering Systems | Pipeline Miles (2) | ||||||||||||||||
Colorado | DJ Basin complex (3) | Gathering, Processing, & Treating | 15 | 1,480 | 39 | 155 | 375,962 | 2 | 3,270 | ||||||||||||||||
Colorado | DJ Basin oil system | Gathering & Treating | 6 | — | 155 | 29 | 6,905 | 1 | 347 | ||||||||||||||||
Utah | Chipeta (4) | Processing | 3 | 790 | — | 12 | 74,875 | — | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | 24 | 2,270 | 194 | 196 | 457,742 | 3 | 3,619 |
(1) | Includes 160 MMcf/d of bypass capacity at the DJ Basin complex. |
(2) | Includes 12 miles of transportation related to a crude-oil pipeline at the DJ Basin oil system. |
(3) | The DJ Basin complex includes the Platte Valley, Fort Lupton, Fort Lupton JT, Hambert JT (currently inactive), Wattenberg, Lancaster Trains I and II, and Latham Train I processing plants, and the Wattenberg gathering system. Excludes 600 gpm of amine-treating capacity. |
(4) | We are the managing member of and own a 75% interest in Chipeta, which owns the Chipeta processing complex. |
![co2019.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001423902/000142390220000019/co2019.jpg)
19
DJ Basin gathering, treating, and processing complex
• | Customers. For the year ended December 31, 2019, Occidental’s production represented 62% of the DJ Basin complex throughput and the two-largest third-party customers provided 19% of the throughput. Effective December 31, 2019, Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore, LP, a subsidiary of Occidental, and Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC (“KMGG”), a subsidiary of WES Operating, entered into an amendment to the DJ gas-gathering agreement to provide for the extension of gathering services by KMGG to gas produced by a subsidiary of Occidental in Weld County, Colorado, in the DJ Basin for a primary term ending August 2029. This agreement provides new acreage dedications covering approximately 21,000 acres. |
• | Supply. The DJ Basin complex is supplied primarily by the Wattenberg field. There were 1,806 active receipt points connected to the DJ Basin complex as of December 31, 2019. Occidental has dedicated to WES approximately 640,000 gross acres within the DJ Basin. |
• | Delivery points. As of December 31, 2019, the DJ Basin complex had various delivery-point interconnections with DCP Midstream LP’s (“DCP”) gathering and processing system for gas not processed within the DJ Basin complex. The DJ Basin complex is connected to the Colorado Interstate Gas Company LLC’s pipeline (“CIG pipeline”) and Xcel Energy’s residue pipelines for natural-gas residue takeaway and to Overland Pass Pipeline Company LLC’s pipeline and FRP’s pipeline for NGLs takeaway. In addition, the NGLs fractionator at the Platte Valley plant and associated truck-loading facility provides access to local NGLs markets. |
DJ Basin oil-gathering system, stabilization facility, and storage
• | Customers. For the year ended December 31, 2019, all of the DJ Basin oil system throughput was from Occidental’s production. |
• | Supply. The DJ Basin oil system, which is supplied primarily by the Wattenberg field, gathers high-vapor-pressure crude oil and delivers it to the COSF. The COSF includes two 250,000 barrel crude-oil storage tanks and connectivity to local storage owned by Energy Transfer LP (“ET”). |
• | Delivery points. The COSF has market access to the White Cliffs pipeline, Saddlehorn pipeline, and rail-loading facilities in Tampa, Colorado, and local markets. |
20
![ut2019.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001423902/000142390220000019/ut2019.jpg)
Chipeta processing complex
• | Customers. For the year ended December 31, 2019, Occidental’s production represented 66% of the Chipeta complex throughput and the two largest third-party customers provided 27% of the throughput. |
• | Supply. The Chipeta complex is well positioned to access Occidental and third-party production in the Uinta Basin. Occidental has dedicated to WES approximately 170,000 gross acres in the Uinta Basin. Chipeta’s inlet is connected to Occidental’s Greater Natural Buttes gathering system, the Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline, LLC system (“Questar pipeline”), and Three Rivers Gathering, LLC’s system, which is owned by MPLX LP (“MPLX”). |
• | Delivery points. The Chipeta plant delivers NGLs via the GNB NGL pipeline to Enterprise Products Partners LP’s (“Enterprise”) Mid-America Pipeline Company pipeline (“MAPL pipeline”), which provides transportation through Enterprise’s Seminole pipeline (“Seminole pipeline”) and TEP’s pipeline in West Texas, and ultimately to the NGLs fractionation and storage facilities in Mont Belvieu, Texas. The Chipeta plant has residue gas delivery points through the following pipelines that deliver residue gas to markets throughout the Rockies and Western United States: |
◦ | CIG pipeline; |
◦ | Questar pipeline; and |
◦ | Wyoming Interstate Company’s pipeline (“WIC pipeline”). |
21
Overview - Rocky Mountains - Wyoming
Location | Asset | Type | Processing / Treating Plants | Processing / Treating Capacity (MMcf/d) | Compressors | Compression Horsepower | Gathering Systems | Pipeline Miles | ||||||||||||||
Northeast Wyoming | Bison | Treating | 3 | 450 | 9 | 14,645 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Northeast Wyoming | Fort Union (1) | Gathering & Treating | 3 | 295 | 3 | 5,454 | 1 | 315 | ||||||||||||||
Northeast Wyoming | Hilight | Gathering & Processing | 2 | 60 | 34 | 36,554 | 1 | 1,124 | ||||||||||||||
Southwest Wyoming | Granger complex (2) | Gathering & Processing | 4 | 520 | 41 | 44,967 | 1 | 741 | ||||||||||||||
Southwest Wyoming | Red Desert complex (3) | Gathering & Processing | 1 | 125 | 25 | 50,303 | 1 | 1,061 | ||||||||||||||
Southwest Wyoming | Rendezvous (4) | Gathering | — | — | 5 | 7,485 | 1 | 338 | ||||||||||||||
Total | 13 | 1,450 | 117 | 159,408 | 5 | 3,579 |
(1) | We have a 14.81% interest in Fort Union. |
(2) | The Granger complex includes the “Granger straddle plant,” a refrigeration processing plant. |
(3) | The Red Desert complex includes the Red Desert cryogenic processing plant, which currently is inactive, and the Patrick Draw cryogenic processing plant. |
(4) | We have a 22% interest in the Rendezvous gathering system, which is operated by a third party. |
![wy2019.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001423902/000142390220000019/wy2019.jpg)
22
Northeast Wyoming
Bison treating facility
• | Customers. Bison treating facility throughput was from one third-party customer as of December 31, 2019. In connection with Anadarko’s sale of the Powder River Basin coal-bed methane assets in 2015, Occidental still retains a commitment to Bison that extends through December 2020 for which we earn affiliate revenues. |
• | Supply and delivery points. The Bison treating facility treats and compresses gas from coal-bed methane wells in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming. The Bison treating facility is directly connected to Fort Union’s pipeline and the Bison Pipeline operated by TransCanada Corporation. |
Fort Union gathering system and treating facility
• | Customers. One shipper holds a majority of the firm capacity on the Fort Union system. To the extent capacity on the system is not used by this customer, it is available to third parties under interruptible agreements. |
• | Supply. Substantially all of Fort Union’s gas supply is comprised of coal-bed methane volumes from the Powder River Basin near Gillette, Wyoming, that are either produced or gathered by the customer noted above and its affiliates. These volumes are gathered and treated under contracts with minimum-volume commitments. |
• | Delivery points. The Fort Union system delivers coal-bed methane gas to the hub in Glenrock, Wyoming, which accesses the following interstate pipelines: |
◦ | CIG pipeline; |
◦ | Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission system’s pipeline (“TIGT pipeline”); and |
◦ | WIC pipeline. |
These pipelines serve gas markets in the Rocky Mountains and Midwest regions of the United States.
Hilight gathering system and processing plant
• | Customers. As of December 31, 2019, gas gathered and processed at the Hilight system was from third-party customers. The four-largest producers provided 70% of the system throughput for the year ended December 31, 2019. |
• | Supply. The Hilight system serves the gas-gathering needs of several conventional producing fields in Johnson, Campbell, Natrona, and Converse Counties, Wyoming. |
• | Delivery points. The Hilight plant delivers residue gas to our MIGC transmission line (see Transportation within these Items 1 and 2). Hilight is not connected to an active NGLs pipeline, resulting in all fractionated NGLs being sold locally through truck and rail loading facilities. |
23
Southwest Wyoming
Granger gathering and processing complex
• | Customers. As of December 31, 2019, Granger complex throughput was from third-party customers, with the three-largest third-party customers providing 77% of the Granger complex throughput for the year ended December 31, 2019. |
• | Supply. The Granger complex is supplied by the Moxa Arch and the Jonah and Pinedale Anticline fields. The Granger gas-gathering system had 580 active receipt points as of December 31, 2019. |
• | Delivery points. Residue gas from the Granger complex can be delivered to the following major pipelines: |
◦ | CIG pipeline; |
◦ | Berkshire Hathaway Energy’s Kern River pipeline (“Kern River pipeline”) via a connect with MPLX’s Rendezvous pipeline (“Rendezvous pipeline”); |
◦ | Questar pipeline; |
◦ | Dominion Energy Overthrust Pipeline; |
◦ | The Williams Companies, Inc.’s Northwest Pipeline (“NWPL”); |
◦ | our OTTCO pipeline; and |
◦ | our Mountain Gas Transportation LLC pipeline. |
The NGLs have market access to the MAPL pipeline, which terminates at Mont Belvieu, Texas, and other local markets.
Red Desert gathering and processing complex
• | Customers. For the year ended December 31, 2019, 70% of the Red Desert complex throughput was from the four-largest third-party customers and 1% was from Occidental. |
• | Supply. The Red Desert complex gathers, compresses, treats, and processes natural gas and fractionates NGLs produced from the eastern portion of the Greater Green River Basin, providing service primarily to the Red Desert and Washakie Basins. |
• | Delivery points. Residue from the Red Desert complex is delivered to the CIG and WIC pipelines, while NGLs are delivered to the MAPL pipeline and to truck- and rail-loading facilities. |
Rendezvous gathering system
• | Customers. As of December 31, 2019, Rendezvous system throughput primarily was from two shippers that have dedicated acreage to the system. |
• | Supply and delivery points. The Rendezvous system provides high-pressure gathering service for gas from the Jonah and Pinedale Anticline fields and delivers to our Granger plant and MPLX’s Blacks Fork gas-processing plant, which connects to the Questar pipeline, NWPL, and the Kern River pipeline via the Rendezvous pipeline. |
24
Overview - Texas and New Mexico
Location | Asset | Type | Processing / Treating Plants | Processing / Treating Capacity (MMcf/d) (1) | Processing / Treating / Disposal Capacity (MBbls/d) | Compressors / Pumps (2) | Compression Horsepower (2) | Gathering Systems | Pipeline Miles (3) | ||||||||||||||||
West Texas / New Mexico | West Texas complex (4) | Gathering, Processing, & Treating | 14 | 1,300 | 46 | 280 | 473,230 | 3 | 1,577 | ||||||||||||||||
West Texas | DBM oil system (5) | Gathering & Treating | 14 | — | 195 | 102 | 17,598 | 1 | 576 | ||||||||||||||||
West Texas | DBM water systems | Gathering & Disposal | — | — | 885 | 125 | 50,750 | 5 | 851 | ||||||||||||||||
West Texas | Mi Vida (6) | Processing | 1 | 200 | — | 4 | 20,000 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
West Texas | Ranch Westex (7) | Processing | 2 | 125 | — | 2 | 10,090 | — | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
East Texas | Mont Belvieu JV (8) | Processing | 2 | — | 170 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
South Texas | Brasada complex | Gathering, Processing, & Treating | 3 | 200 | 15 | 14 | 30,450 | 1 | 57 | ||||||||||||||||
South Texas | Springfield system (9) | Gathering and Treating | 3 | — | 75 | 107 | 172,216 | 2 | 771 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | 39 | 1,825 | 1,386 | 634 | 774,334 | 12 | 3,838 |
(1) | Includes 70 MMcf/d of bypass capacity at the West Texas complex. |
(2) | Includes owned, rented, and leased compressors and compression horsepower. |
(3) | Includes 18 miles of transportation related to the Ramsey Residue Lines (regulated by FERC) at the West Texas complex and 14 miles of transportation related to a crude-oil pipeline at the DBM oil system. |
(4) | The West Texas complex includes the DBM complex and DBJV and Haley systems. Excludes 2,300 gpm of amine-treating capacity. |
(5) | The DBM oil system includes three central production facilities and two ROTFs. |
(6) | We own a 50% interest in Mi Vida, which owns a processing plant operated by a third party. |
(7) | We own a 50% interest in Ranch Westex, which owns a processing plant operated by a third party. |
(8) | We own a 25% interest in the Mont Belvieu JV, which owns two NGLs fractionation trains. A third party serves as the operator. |
(9) | We own a 50.1% interest in the Springfield system and serve as the operator. |
25
![wtx2019.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001423902/000142390220000019/wtx2019.jpg)
West Texas gathering, treating, and processing complex
• | Customers. For the year ended December 31, 2019, Occidental’s production represented 41% of the West Texas complex throughput and the largest third-party customer provided 10% of the throughput. |
• | Supply. Supply of gas and NGLs for the complex comes from production from the Delaware Sands, Avalon Shale, Bone Spring, Wolfcamp, and Penn formations in the Delaware Basin portion of the Permian Basin. Occidental has dedicated to WES approximately 530,000 gross acres within the Delaware Basin. |
• | Delivery points. Avalon, Bone Spring, and Wolfcamp gas is dehydrated, compressed, and delivered to the Ranch Westex and Mi Vida plants (see below) and within the West Texas complex for processing, while lean gas is delivered into Enterprise GC, L.P.’s pipeline for ultimate delivery into ET’s Oasis pipeline (the “Oasis pipeline”). Residue gas from the West Texas complex is delivered to the Red Bluff Express pipeline and the Ramsey Residue Lines, which extend from the complex to the south and to the north, with both lines connecting with Kinder Morgan, Inc.’s interstate pipeline system. NGLs production is delivered into the Sand Hills pipeline, Lone Star NGL LLC’s pipeline (“Lone Star pipeline”), and EPIC Y-Grade Pipeline, LP’s NGL pipeline. |
26
DBM oil-gathering system, treating facilities, and storage
• | Customers. As of December 31, 2019, DBM oil system throughput was from Occidental and one third-party producer. For the year ended December 31, 2019, Occidental’s production represented 94% of the DBM oil system throughput. All parties ship pursuant to a tariff on file with the Texas Railroad Commission. |
• | Supply. The DBM oil system is supplied from production from the Delaware Basin portion of the Permian Basin. |
• | Delivery points. Crude oil treated at the DBM oil system and a third-party treating facility is delivered from the system into Plains All American Pipeline. |
DBM produced-water disposal systems
• | Customers. As of December 31, 2019, DBM water systems throughput was from Occidental and numerous third-party producers. Occidental’s production represented 82% of the throughput for the year ended December 31, 2019. |
• | Supply. Supply of produced water for the systems comes from crude-oil production from the Delaware Basin portion of the Permian Basin. |
• | Disposal. The DBM water systems gather and dispose produced water via subsurface injection or offload to third-party service providers. The systems’ injection wells are located in Loving, Reeves, and Ward Counties in Texas. |
Mi Vida processing plant
• | Customers. As of December 31, 2019, Mi Vida plant throughput was from Occidental and one third-party customer. |
• | Supply and delivery points. The Mi Vida plant receives volumes from the West Texas complex and ET’s gathering system. Residue gas from the Mi Vida plant is delivered to the Oasis pipeline or Transwestern Pipeline Company LLC’s pipeline (“Transwestern pipeline”). NGLs production is delivered to the Lone Star pipeline. |
Ranch Westex processing plant
• | Customers. As of December 31, 2019, Ranch Westex plant throughput was from Occidental and one third-party customer. |
• | Supply and delivery points. The Ranch Westex plant receives volumes from the West Texas complex and Crestwood Equity Partners LP’s gathering system. Residue gas from the Ranch Westex plant is delivered to the Oasis pipeline or Transwestern pipeline and NGLs production is delivered to the Lone Star pipeline. |
27
![etx2019.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001423902/000142390220000019/etx2019.jpg)
Mont Belvieu JV fractionation trains
• | Customers. The Mont Belvieu JV does not contract with customers directly, but is allocated volumes from Enterprise based on the available capacity of the other trains at Enterprise’s NGLs fractionation complex in Mont Belvieu, Texas. |
• | Supply and delivery points. Enterprise receives volumes at its fractionation complex in Mont Belvieu, Texas via a large number of pipelines, including the Seminole pipeline, Skelly-Belvieu Pipeline Company, LLC’s pipeline, TEP, and Panola pipeline (see Transportation within these Items 1 and 2). Individual NGLs are delivered to end users either through customer-owned pipelines that are connected to nearby petrochemical plants or via export terminals. |
28
![stx2019.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001423902/000142390220000019/stx2019.jpg)
Brasada gathering, stabilization, treating, and processing complex
• | Customers. Brasada complex throughput was from one third-party customer as of December 31, 2019. |
• | Supply. Supply of gas and NGLs is sourced from throughput gathered by the Springfield system. |
• | Delivery points. The facility delivers residue gas to the Eagle Ford Midstream system operated by NET Midstream, LLC. Stabilized condensate is delivered to Plains All American Pipeline and NGLs are delivered to the Enterprise-operated South Texas NGL Pipeline System. |
Springfield gathering system, stabilization facility, and storage
• | Customers. Springfield system throughput was from numerous third-party customers as of December 31, 2019. |
• | Supply. Supply of gas and oil is sourced from third-party production in the Eagleford shale. |
• | Delivery points. The gas-gathering system delivers rich gas to our Brasada complex, the Targa Resources Corp.-owned Raptor processing plant, Sanchez Midstream Partners LP, and to processing plants operated by Enterprise, ET, and Kinder Morgan, Inc. The oil-gathering system has delivery points to Plains All American Pipeline, Kinder Morgan, Inc.’s Double Eagle Pipeline, Hilcorp Energy Company’s Harvest Pipeline, and NuStar Energy L.P.’s Pipeline. |
29
Overview - North-central Pennsylvania
Location | Asset | Type | Compressors | Compression Horsepower | Gathering Systems | Pipeline Miles | ||||||||||
North-central Pennsylvania | Marcellus (1) | Gathering | 7 | 9,660 | 3 | 146 |
(1) | We own a 33.75% interest in the Marcellus Interest gathering systems. |
![pa2019.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001423902/000142390220000019/pa2019.jpg)
Marcellus gathering systems
• | Customers. As of December 31, 2019, the Marcellus Interest gathering systems had two priority shippers. The largest producer provided 80% of the throughput for the year ended December 31, 2019. Capacity not used by priority shippers is available to third parties as determined by the operating partner, Alta Resources Development, LLC. |
• | Supply and delivery points. The Marcellus Interest gathering systems are well-positioned to serve dry-gas production from the Marcellus shale. The Marcellus Interest gathering systems have access to Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC’s pipeline. |
30
Overview
![transportation2019.jpg](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001423902/000142390220000019/transportation2019.jpg)
31
Location | Asset | Type | Pipeline Miles | ||||
Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma | White Cliffs (1) (2) | Oil & NGLs | 1,054 | ||||
Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma | Saddlehorn (1) (3) | Oil | 600 | ||||
Utah | GNB NGL (1) | NGLs | 33 | ||||
Northeast Wyoming | MIGC (1) | Gas | 243 | ||||
Southwest Wyoming | OTTCO | Gas | 208 | ||||
Southwest Wyoming | Wamsutter | Oil | 61 | ||||
Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas | FRP (1) (4) | NGLs | 447 | ||||
Texas, Oklahoma | TEG (4) | NGLs | 191 | ||||
Texas | TEP (1) (4) | NGLs | 593 | ||||
Texas | Whitethorn LLC (5) | Oil | 416 | ||||
Texas | Panola (1) (6) | NGLs | 248 | ||||
Texas | Cactus II (1) (7) | Oil | 461 | ||||
Texas | Red Bluff Express (1) (8) | Gas | 82 | ||||
Total | 4,637 |
(1) | White Cliffs, Saddlehorn, GNB NGL, MIGC, FRP, TEP, Panola, Cactus II, and Red Bluff Express are regulated by FERC. |
(2) | We own a 10% interest in the White Cliffs pipeline, which is operated by a third party. |
(3) | We own a 20% interest in the Saddlehorn pipeline, which is operated by a third party. |
(4) | We own a 20% interest in TEG and TEP and a 33.33% interest in FRP. All three systems are operated by third parties. |
(5) | We own a 20% interest in Whitethorn, which is operated by a third party. |
(6) | We own a 15% interest in the Panola pipeline, which is operated by a third party. |
(7) | We own a 15% interest in the Cactus II pipeline, which is operated by a third party. |
(8) | We own a 30% interest in the Red Bluff Express pipeline, which is operated by a third party. |
Rocky Mountains - Colorado
White Cliffs pipeline
• | Customers. The White Cliffs pipeline had multiple committed shippers, including Occidental, as of December 31, 2019. Other parties may also ship on the White Cliffs pipeline at FERC-based rates. The White Cliffs dual-pipeline system provides crude-oil and NGL takeaway capacity of approximately 190 MBbls/d from Platteville, Colorado, to Cushing, Oklahoma. In 2019, one of the pipelines was converted from crude-oil service to NGL Y-grade service. |
• | Supply. The White Cliffs pipeline is supplied by production from the DJ Basin. At the point of origin, there is a storage facility adjacent to a truck-unloading facility. |
• | Delivery points. The White Cliffs pipeline delivery point is ET’s storage facility in Cushing, Oklahoma, a major crude-oil marketing center, which ultimately delivers to Gulf Coast and mid-continent refineries. |
Saddlehorn pipeline
• | Customers. The Saddlehorn pipeline had multiple committed shippers, including Occidental, as of December 31, 2019. Other parties may also ship on the Saddlehorn pipeline at FERC-based rates. |
• | Supply. The Saddlehorn pipeline has multiple origin points including: Cheyenne, Wyoming; Ft. Laramie, Wyoming; Carr, Colorado; and Platteville, Colorado. Saddlehorn is supplied by the DJ Basin and basins that connect to a Wyoming access point. |
• | Delivery points. The Saddlehorn pipeline delivers crude oil and condensate to storage facilities in Cushing, Oklahoma. |
32
Rocky Mountains - Utah
GNB NGL pipeline
• | Customers. Occidental was the only shipper on the GNB NGL pipeline as of December 31, 2019. The GNB NGL pipeline provides capacity at the posted FERC-based rates. |
• | Supply. The GNB NGL pipeline receives NGLs from Chipeta’s gas-processing facility and MPLX’s Stagecoach/Iron Horse gas-processing complex. |
• | Delivery points. The GNB NGL pipeline delivers NGLs to the MAPL pipeline, which provides transportation through the Seminole pipeline and TEP in West Texas, and ultimately to NGLs fractionation and storage facilities in Mont Belvieu, Texas. |
Rocky Mountains - Wyoming
MIGC transportation system
• | Customers. Occidental was the largest firm shipper on the MIGC system, with 56% of the throughput for the year ended December 31, 2019. The remaining throughput on the MIGC system was from numerous third-party shippers. MIGC is certificated for 175 MMcf/d of firm-transportation capacity. All parties on the MIGC system ship pursuant to a tariff on file with FERC. |
• | Supply. MIGC receives gas from the Hilight system, Evolution Midstream’s Jewell plant, various coal-bed methane gathering systems in the Powder River Basin, and from WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. on the north end of the transportation system. |
• | Delivery points. MIGC volumes can be redelivered to the hub in Glenrock, Wyoming, which has access to the following interstate pipelines: |
◦ | CIG pipeline; |
◦ | TIGT pipeline; and |
◦ | WIC pipeline. |
Volumes can also be delivered to Cheyenne Light Fuel & Power and several industrial users.
OTTCO transportation system
• | Customers. For the year ended December 31, 2019, 8% of OTTCO’s throughput was from Occidental. The remaining throughput on the OTTCO transportation system was from two third-party shippers. Revenues on the OTTCO transportation system are generated from contracts that contain minimum-volume commitments and volumetric fees paid by shippers under firm and interruptible gas-transportation agreements. |
• | Supply and delivery points. Supply points to the OTTCO transportation system include approximately 28 active wellheads, the Granger complex, and ExxonMobil Corporation’s Shute Creek plant, which are supplied by the eastern portion of the Greater Green River Basin, the Moxa Arch, and the Jonah and Pinedale Anticline fields. Primary delivery points include the Red Desert complex, two third-party industrial facilities, and an inactive interconnection with the Kern River pipeline. |
33
Wamsutter pipeline
• | Customers. For the year ended December 31, 2019, 93% of the Wamsutter pipeline throughput was from two third-party shippers, with the remaining throughput from Occidental. Revenues on the Wamsutter pipeline are generated from tariff-based rates regulated by the Wyoming Public Service Commission. |
• | Supply and delivery points. The Wamsutter pipeline has two active receipt points in Sweetwater County, Wyoming, and delivers crude oil to MPLX LP’s SLC Core Pipeline System. |
Texas
TEFR Interests
• | Front Range Pipeline. FRP provides NGLs takeaway capacity from the DJ Basin in Northeast Colorado. FRP has receipt points at gas plants in Weld and Adams Counties, Colorado (including the Lancaster and Wattenberg plants, which are within the DJ Basin complex) (see Rocky Mountains—Colorado and Utah within these Items 1 and 2). FRP connects to TEP near Skellytown, Texas. As of December 31, 2019, FRP had multiple committed shippers, including Occidental. FRP provides capacity to other shippers at the posted FERC tariff rate. In 2018, we elected to participate in the expansion of FRP, which is ongoing and expected to be completed in 2020. The expansion of FRP will increase its capacity by 100 MBbls/d, to a targeted total capacity of approximately 260 MBbls/d. |
• | Texas Express Gathering. TEG consists of two NGLs gathering systems that provide plants in North Texas, the Texas panhandle, and West Oklahoma with access to NGLs takeaway capacity on TEP. TEG had one committed shipper as of December 31, 2019. |
• | Texas Express Pipeline. TEP delivers to NGLs fractionation and storage facilities in Mont Belvieu, Texas. TEP is supplied with NGLs from other pipelines including FRP, the MAPL pipeline, and TEG. As of December 31, 2019, TEP had multiple committed shippers, including Occidental. TEP provides capacity to other shippers at the posted FERC tariff rates. In 2018, we elected to participate in the expansion of TEP. The expansion was completed in November 2019 and increased capacity by 90 MBbls/d, to a total capacity of approximately 350 MBbls/d. |
Whitethorn
Supply and delivery points. Whitethorn is supplied by production from the Permian Basin. Whitethorn transports crude oil and condensate from Enterprise’s Midland terminal to Enterprise’s Sealy terminal. From Sealy, shippers have access to Enterprise’s Rancho II pipeline, which extends to Enterprise’s ECHO terminal located in Houston, Texas. From ECHO, shippers have access to refineries in Houston, Texas City, Beaumont, and Port Arthur, Texas, and Enterprise’s crude-oil export facilities.
Panola pipeline
Supply and delivery points. The Panola pipeline transports NGLs from Panola County, Texas, to Mont Belvieu, Texas. As of December 31, 2019, the Panola pipeline had multiple committed shippers. The Panola pipeline provides capacity to other shippers at the posted FERC-based rates.
Cactus II pipeline
• | Customers. As of December 31, 2019, the Cactus II pipeline had multiple committed shippers, including Occidental. The Cactus II pipeline also provides capacity to other shippers at the posted FERC-based rates. |
• | Supply. The Cactus II pipeline is supplied by production from McCamey, Texas, and leases capacity on Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.’s intra-Delaware Basin pipelines to allow for origin points in Orla, Wink, Midland, and Crane, Texas. |
• | Delivery points. The Cactus II pipeline transports crude oil from West Texas to the Corpus Christi, Texas, area. Primary delivery points in Corpus Christi include the Plains All American Pipeline; Nustar Energy, L.P.; Moda Ingleside Energy Center; and Buckeye Partners, L.P.’s export terminals. |
34
Red Bluff Express pipeline
• | Customers. As of December 31, 2019, the Red Bluff Express pipeline had multiple committed shippers, including Occidental. The Red Bluff Express pipeline also provides capacity to other shippers at the posted FERC-based rates. |
• | Supply and delivery points. The Red Bluff Express pipeline is supplied by production from (i) our Ramsey and Mentone gas-processing plants that are part of the West Texas complex and (ii) other third-party plants. The Red Bluff Express pipeline transports natural gas from Reeves and Loving Counties, Texas, to the WAHA hub in Pecos County, Texas. |
Assets Under Development
In addition to significant gathering expansion projects at the West Texas and DJ Basin complexes and the DBM water systems, we currently have significant Colorado- and Texas-based projects scheduled for completion in 2020 that are described in greater detail below. See Capital expenditures, under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
• | Latham Train II. As of December 31, 2019, we were constructing a second cryogenic train at the Latham processing plant at the DJ Basin complex. Latham Train II commenced operation in February 2020 with a capacity of 200 MMcf/d. Upon completion of Latham Train II, the DJ Basin complex has a total processing capacity of 1,680 MMcf/d. |
• | Loving ROTF Trains III and IV. We currently are commissioning and constructing two additional oil-stabilization trains at the ROTFs (part of the DBM oil system). Loving ROTF Trains III and IV will have capacities of 30 MBbls/d each. Construction of Loving ROTF Train III was complete in the fourth quarter of 2019 and commenced operation in January 2020. Loving ROTF Train IV is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2020. Upon completion, the DBM oil system will have a total processing capacity of 255 MBbls/d. |
COMPETITION
The midstream services business is extremely competitive, and our competitors include other midstream companies, producers, and intrastate and interstate pipelines. Competition primarily is based on reputation, commercial terms, reliability, service levels, location, available capacity, capital expenditures, and fuel efficiencies. Competition levels vary in our geographic areas of operation and is greatest in areas experiencing heightened producer activity and during periods of high commodity prices. Notwithstanding, Occidental supports our operations by providing dedications and/or minimum-volume commitments in our significant areas of operation. We believe that our assets located outside of the dedicated areas are geographically well-positioned to retain and attract third-party volumes due to our competitive rates. Major competitors in various aspects of our business include Crestwood Equity Partners LP, DCP Midstream LP, MPLX LP, The Williams Companies, Inc., EagleClaw Midstream Ventures, LLC, EnLink Midstream Partners, LP, Enterprise Products Partners LP, Energy Transfer LP, Kinder Morgan, Inc., Plains All American Pipeline, Tallgrass Energy, LP, and Targa Resources Partners LP.
We believe the primary advantages of our assets include proximity to established and/or future production and the available service flexibility provided to producers. We believe we can efficiently, and at competitive and flexible contract terms, provide services that customers require to gather, compress, treat, process, and transport natural gas; gather, stabilize, and transport condensate, NGLs, and crude oil; and gather and dispose of produced water.
35
REGULATION OF OPERATIONS
Safety and Maintenance
Many of the pipelines we use to gather and transport oil, natural gas, and NGLs are subject to regulation by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”), an agency under the U.S. Department of Transportation, pursuant to the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended (the “NGPSA”), with respect to natural gas, and the Hazardous Liquids Pipeline Safety Act of 1979, as amended (the “HLPSA”), with respect to NGLs and oil. The NGPSA and HLPSA govern the design, installation, testing, construction, operation, replacement, and management of natural-gas, crude-oil, NGLs, and condensate pipeline facilities. Pursuant to these acts, PHMSA has promulgated regulations governing, among other things, pipeline wall thicknesses, design pressures, maximum operating pressures (“MOP”), pipeline patrols and leak surveys, minimum depth requirements, emergency procedures, and other matters intended to ensure adequate protection for the public and to prevent accidents and failures. Additionally, PHMSA has promulgated regulations requiring pipeline operators to develop and implement integrity-management programs for certain gas and hazardous liquid pipelines that, in the event of a pipeline leak or rupture, could affect high consequence areas (“HCAs”), where a release could have the most significant adverse consequences, including high population areas, certain drinking water sources, and unusually sensitive ecological areas. Past operation of our pipelines with respect to these NGPSA and HLPSA requirements has not resulted in the incurrence of material costs; however, the possibility of new or amended laws and regulations or reinterpretation of PHMSA enforcement practices or other guidance with respect thereto, future compliance with the NGPSA and HLPSA could result in increased costs that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
Legislation adopted in recent years has resulted in more stringent mandates for pipeline safety and has charged PHMSA with developing and adopting regulations that impose increased pipeline-safety requirements on pipeline operators. The Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty and Job Creation Act of 2011 (the “2011 Pipeline Safety Act”), which became law in January 2012, amended the NGPSA and HLPSA by increasing the penalties for safety violations, establishing additional safety requirements for newly constructed pipelines and requiring studies of safety issues that could result in the adoption of new regulatory requirements for existing pipelines. In June 2016, President Obama signed the Protecting Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2016 (the “2016 Pipeline Safety Act”), further amending the NGPSA and HLPSA, extending PHMSA’s statutory mandate through 2019 and, among other things, requiring PHMSA to complete certain of the outstanding mandates under the 2011 Pipeline Safety Act and empowering the agency to address imminent hazards by imposing emergency restrictions, prohibitions, and safety measures on owners and operators of gas or hazardous liquid pipeline facilities without prior notice or an opportunity for a hearing. PHMSA published an interim final rule in 2016 to implement the agency’s expanded authority over imminent pipeline hazards.
The adoption of new or amended regulations by PHMSA that result in more stringent or costly pipeline-integrity management or safety standards could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations. For example, in January 2017, PHMSA issued a final rule that significantly extended and expanded the reach of certain PHMSA hazardous liquid pipeline-integrity management requirements, such as periodic assessments, leak detection, and repairs, regardless of the pipeline’s proximity to a high-consequence area. The final rule also imposed new reporting requirements for certain unregulated pipelines, including all hazardous liquid gathering lines. However, implementation of this final rule by publication in the Federal Register was delayed following the January 2017 change from the Obama to Trump presidential administrations. In a second example, in March 2016, PHMSA announced a proposed rulemaking that would impose new or more stringent requirements for certain gas-transportation and gathering lines including, among other things, expanding certain of PHMSA’s current regulatory safety programs for gas pipelines in newly defined “moderate-consequence areas” that contain as few as five dwellings within a potential impact area; requiring gas pipelines installed before 1970 and thus excluded from certain pressure testing obligations to be tested to determine their MOP; and requiring certain onshore and offshore gathering lines in Class I areas to comply with damage prevention, corrosion control, public education, MOP limits, line markers, and emergency-planning standards. Additional requirements proposed by this proposed rulemaking would increase PHMSA’s integrity-management requirements for gas pipelines and also require consideration of seismicity in evaluating threats to pipelines. PHMSA has split this so-called gas “Mega Rule” into three separate rulemaking proceedings.
36
In October 2019, PHMSA submitted three major rules to the Federal Register, including rules focused on (i) the safety of gas-transmission pipelines (i.e., the first of the three parts of the Mega Rule), (ii) the safety of hazardous liquid pipelines, and (iii) enhanced emergency-order procedures. The gas-transmission rule requires operators of gas-transmission pipelines constructed before 1970 to determine the material strength of their lines by reconfirming the MOP. In addition, the rule updates reporting and records-retention standards for gas-transmission pipelines. This rule will take effect on July 1, 2020. PHMSA then is expected to issue the second part of the Mega Rule focusing on repair criteria in HCAs and creating new repair criteria for non-HCAs, requirements for inspecting pipelines following extreme events, updates to pipeline-corrosion control requirements, and various other integrity-management requirements. PHMSA is subsequently expected to issue the final part of the gas Mega Rule, the Gas Gathering Rule, focusing on requirements relating to gas-gathering lines in low-population-density areas.
The safety of hazardous liquid pipelines rule (submitted by PHMSA in October 2019) extended leak-detection requirements to all non-gathering hazardous liquid pipelines and requires operators to inspect affected pipelines following extreme weather events or natural disasters to address any resulting damage. This rule also will take effect July 1, 2020. Finally, the enhanced emergency-order procedures rule focuses on increased emergency-safety measures. In particular, this rule increases the authority of PHMSA to issue an emergency order that addresses unsafe conditions or hazards that pose an imminent threat to pipeline safety. Unlike the other two rules submitted in October 2019, this rule took effect on December 2, 2019.
New laws or regulations adopted by PHMSA, like those summarized above, may impose more stringent requirements applicable to integrity-management programs and other pipeline-safety aspects of our operations, which could cause us to incur increased capital and operating costs and operational delays. In addition, while states are largely preempted by federal law from regulating pipeline safety for interstate lines, most are certified by PHMSA to assume responsibility for enforcing federal intrastate pipeline regulations and inspection of intrastate pipelines. In practice, because states can adopt stricter standards for intrastate pipelines than those imposed by the federal government for interstate lines, states vary considerably in their authority and capacity to address pipeline safety. Historically, our intrastate pipeline-safety compliance costs have not had a material adverse effect on our operations; however, there can be no assurance that such costs will remain immaterial in the future.
We also are subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, including the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, as amended, and comparable state statutes, the purposes of which are to protect the health and safety of workers, generally and within the pipeline industry. Furthermore, we and the entities in which we own an interest are subject to regulations imposed by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) that (i) require information to be maintained concerning hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that such information be provided to employees, state and local government authorities, and citizens and (ii) are designed to prevent or minimize the consequences of catastrophic releases of toxic, reactive, flammable, or explosive chemicals.
See Risk Factor, “Federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to pipeline safety that require the use of new or more-stringent safety controls or result in more-stringent enforcement of applicable legal requirements could subject us to increased capital costs, operational delays, and costs of operation” under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K for further discussion on pipeline safety standards.
Interstate Natural-Gas Pipeline Regulation
Regulation of pipeline-transportation services may affect certain aspects of our business and the market for our products and services. The operations of our MIGC pipeline and the Ramsey Residue Lines are subject to regulation by FERC under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (the “NGA”). Under the NGA, FERC has authority to regulate natural-gas companies that provide natural-gas pipeline-transportation services in interstate commerce. Federal regulation extends to such matters as the following:
• | rates, services, and terms and conditions of service; |
• | types of services that may be offered to customers; |
• | certification and construction of new facilities; |
• | acquisition, extension, disposition, or abandonment of facilities; |
• | maintenance of accounts and records; |
37
• | internet posting requirements for available capacity, discounts, and other matters; |
• | pipeline segmentation to allow multiple simultaneous shipments under the same contract; |
• | capacity release to create a secondary market for transportation services; |
• | relationships between affiliated companies involved in certain aspects of the natural-gas business; |
• | initiation and discontinuation of services; |
• | market manipulation in connection with interstate sales, purchases, or transportation of natural gas and NGLs; and |
• | participation by interstate pipelines in cash management arrangements. |
Natural-gas companies are prohibited from charging rates that have not been determined to be just and reasonable by FERC. In addition, FERC prohibits natural-gas companies from unduly preferring or unreasonably discriminating against any person with respect to pipeline rates or terms and conditions of service.
The rates and terms and conditions for our interstate-pipeline services are set forth in FERC-approved tariffs. Pursuant to FERC’s jurisdiction over rates, existing rates may be challenged by complaint or by action of FERC under Section 5 of the NGA, and proposed rate increases may be challenged by protest. The outcome of any successful complaint or protest against our rates could have an adverse impact on revenues associated with providing transportation service.
For example, one such matter relates to FERC’s policy regarding allowances for income taxes in determining a regulated entity’s cost of service. In July 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued its opinion in United Airlines, Inc., et al. v. FERC, finding that FERC had acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it failed to demonstrate that permitting an interstate petroleum-products pipeline organized as a limited partnership to include an income tax allowance in the cost of service underlying its rates in addition to the discounted cash flow return on equity would not result in the pipeline partnership owners double-recovering their income taxes. The court vacated FERC’s order and remanded to FERC to consider mechanisms for demonstrating that there is no double recovery as a result of the income tax allowance. On March 15, 2018, as clarified on July 18, 2018, in a set of related issuances, FERC addressed treatment of federal income tax allowances in regulated entity rates. To the extent a regulated entity is permitted to include an income tax allowance in its cost of service, FERC directed entities to calculate the income tax allowance at the reduced 21% maximum corporate tax rate established by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. FERC also issued the Revised Policy on Treatment of Income Taxes (“Revised Policy Statement”) stating that it will no longer permit MLPs to recover an income tax allowance in their cost of service rates. FERC has noted that to the extent an entity does not include an income tax allowance in their cost of service rates, such entity may elect to also exclude the accumulated deferred income tax balance from the rate calculation. FERC's Revised Policy Statement may result in an adverse impact on revenues associated with the cost of service rates of our FERC-regulated interstate pipelines.
Interstate natural-gas pipelines regulated by FERC also are required to comply with numerous regulations related to standards of conduct, market transparency, and market manipulation. FERC’s standards of conduct regulate the manner in which interstate natural-gas pipelines may interact with their marketing affiliates (unless FERC has granted a waiver of such standards). FERC’s market oversight and transparency regulations require annual reports of purchases or sales of natural gas meeting certain thresholds and criteria and certain public postings of information on scheduled volumes. FERC’s market manipulation regulations make it unlawful for any entity, directly or indirectly in connection with the purchase or sale of natural gas subject to the jurisdiction of FERC, or the purchase or sale of transportation services subject to the jurisdiction of FERC, to engage in fraudulent conduct. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) also holds authority to monitor certain segments of the physical and futures energy commodities market pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act. FERC and CFTC have authority to impose civil penalties for violations of these statutes and regulations potentially in excess of $1.0 million per day per violation. Should we fail to comply with all applicable statutes, rules, regulations, and orders administered by FERC and CFTC, we could be subject to substantial penalties and fines.
38
Interstate Liquids-Pipeline Regulation
Regulation of interstate liquids-pipeline services may affect certain aspects of our business and the market for our products and services. Our GNB NGL pipeline provides interstate service as a FERC-regulated common carrier under the Interstate Commerce Act, the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and related rules and orders. We also own interests in FRP, TEP, Saddlehorn, Panola, Cactus II, and White Cliffs, each of which provides interstate services as a FERC-regulated common carrier. FERC regulation requires that interstate liquid-pipeline rates, including rates for transportation of NGLs, be filed with FERC and that these rates be “just and reasonable” and not unduly discriminatory. Rates of interstate NGLs pipelines are currently regulated by FERC, primarily through an annual indexing methodology, under which pipelines increase or decrease rates in accordance with an index adjustment specified by FERC. For the five-year period beginning July 2, 2016, FERC established an annual index adjustment equal to the change in the producer price index for finished goods plus 1.23%. This adjustment is subject to review every five years. Under FERC’s regulations, an NGLs pipeline can request a rate increase that exceeds the rate obtained through application of the indexing methodology by using a cost-of-service approach, but only after the pipeline establishes that a substantial divergence exists between the actual costs experienced by the pipeline and the rates resulting from application of the indexing methodology. White Cliffs has a pending request before FERC for authorization to charge market-based rates. On September 12, 2019, the Administrative Law Judge presiding over the case issued an Initial Decision that determined White Cliffs lacks market power, and therefore would be permitted to charge market-based rates. However, White Cliffs cannot yet charge market-based rates, as the Initial Decision is still pending approval by the FERC commissioners.
The Interstate Commerce Act permits interested persons to challenge proposed new or changed rates and authorizes FERC to suspend the effectiveness of such rates for up to seven months pending an investigation. If, upon completion of an investigation, FERC finds that the new or changed rate is unlawful, it is authorized to require the pipeline to refund revenues collected in excess of the just and reasonable rate during the term of the investigation. The just-and-reasonable rate used to calculate refunds cannot be lower than the last tariff rate approved as just and reasonable. FERC may also investigate, upon complaint or on its own motion, rates that are already in effect and may order a carrier to change its rates prospectively. Upon an appropriate showing, a shipper may obtain reparations for charges in excess of a just-and-reasonable rate for a period of up to two years prior to the filing of a complaint. FERC’s Revised Policy Statement, discussed above, that no longer permits MLPs to recover an income tax allowance in cost-of-service rates, also applies to our pipelines regulated under the Interstate Commerce Act. The Revised Policy Statement may result in an adverse impact on revenues associated with the cost-of-service rates of our FERC-regulated interstate pipelines.
As discussed above, the CFTC holds authority to monitor certain segments of the physical and futures energy commodities market. The Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) has authority to monitor petroleum markets in order to prevent market manipulation. The CFTC and FTC have authority to impose civil penalties for violations of these statutes and regulations potentially in excess of $1.0 million per day per violation. Should we fail to comply with all applicable statutes, rules, regulations, and orders administered by the CFTC and FTC, we could be subject to substantial penalties and fines.
Natural-Gas Gathering Pipeline Regulation
Regulation of gas-gathering pipeline services may affect certain aspects of our business and the market for our products and services. Natural-gas gathering facilities are exempt from the jurisdiction of FERC. We believe that our gas-gathering pipelines meet the traditional tests that FERC has used to determine that a pipeline is not subject to FERC jurisdiction, although FERC has not made any determinations with respect to the jurisdictional status of any of our gas pipelines other than MIGC and the Ramsey Residue Lines. However, the distinction between FERC-regulated gas-transmission services and federally unregulated gathering services has been the subject of substantial litigation, so the classification and regulation of our gathering facilities are subject to change based on future determinations by FERC, the courts, or Congress. State regulation of gathering facilities generally includes various safety, environmental and, in some circumstances, nondiscriminatory take requirements and complaint-based rate regulation. FERC makes jurisdictional determinations on a case-by-case basis. Our natural-gas gathering operations could be adversely affected should they be subject to more stringent application of state or federal regulation of rates and services. Our natural-gas gathering operations also may be or become subject to additional safety and operational regulations relating to the design, installation, testing, construction, operation, replacement, and management of gathering facilities. Additional rules and legislation pertaining to these matters are considered or adopted from time to time. We cannot predict what effect, if any, such changes might have on our operations, but the industry could be required to incur additional capital expenditures and increased costs depending on future legislative and regulatory changes.
39
Our natural-gas gathering operations are subject to ratable-take and common-purchaser statutes in most of the states in which we operate. These statutes generally require our gathering pipelines to take natural gas without undue discrimination as to source of supply or producer. These statutes are designed to prohibit discrimination in favor of one producer over another producer or one source of supply over another source of supply. The regulations under these statutes can have the effect of imposing some restrictions on our ability as an owner of gathering facilities to decide with whom we contract to gather natural gas. The states in which we operate have adopted a complaint-based regulation of natural-gas gathering activities, which allows natural-gas producers and shippers to file complaints with state regulators in an effort to resolve grievances relating to gathering access and rate discrimination. We cannot predict whether such a complaint will be filed against us in the future. Failure to comply with state regulations can result in the imposition of administrative, civil, and criminal remedies. To date, there has been no adverse effect to our systems resulting from these regulations.
FERC’s anti-manipulation rules apply to non-jurisdictional entities to the extent the activities are conducted “in connection with” gas sales, purchases, or transportation subject to FERC jurisdiction. The anti-manipulation rules do not apply to activities that relate only to intrastate or other non-jurisdictional sales or gathering, but only to the extent such transactions do not have a “nexus” to jurisdictional transactions. In addition, FERC’s market oversight and transparency regulations also may apply to otherwise non-jurisdictional entities to the extent annual purchases and sales of natural gas reach a certain threshold. FERC’s civil penalty authority, described above, would apply to violations of these rules.
Intrastate-Pipeline Regulation
Regulation of intrastate pipeline services may affect certain aspects of our business and the market for our products and services. Intrastate natural-gas and liquids transportation is subject to regulation by state regulatory agencies. The basis for intrastate regulation of natural-gas transportation and the degree of regulatory oversight and scrutiny given to intrastate pipeline rates and services varies from state to state. Regulations within a particular state generally will affect all intrastate pipeline operators within the state on a comparable basis; thus, we believe that the regulation of intrastate transportation in any state in which we operate will not disproportionately affect our operations.
We own an interest in Red Bluff Express, which offers natural-gas transportation services under Section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978. Such pipelines are required to meet certain quarterly reporting requirements, providing detailed transaction information which could be made public. Such pipelines also will be subject to periodic rate review by FERC. In addition, FERC’s anti-manipulation, market-oversight, and market-transparency regulations may extend to intrastate natural-gas pipelines although they may otherwise be non-jurisdictional, and FERC’s civil penalty authority, described above, would apply to violations of these rules.
Financial-Reform Legislation
For a description of financial reform legislation that may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations, read Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K for more information.
40
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATIONS
Our business operations are subject to numerous federal, regional, state, tribal, and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations. The more significant of these existing environmental laws and regulations include the following legal standards that exist currently in the United States, as amended from time to time:
• | the Clean Air Act, which restricts the emission of air pollutants from many sources and imposes various pre-construction, operational, monitoring, and reporting requirements, and that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) has relied on as the authority for adopting climate-change regulatory initiatives relating to greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions; |
• | the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, which regulates discharges of pollutants from facilities to state and federal waters and establishes the extent to which waterways are subject to federal jurisdiction and rulemaking as protected waters of the United States; |
• | the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, which subjects, among others, owners and operators of onshore facilities and pipelines to liability for removal costs and damages arising from an oil spill in waters of the United States; |
• | regulations imposed by the Bureau of Land Management (the “BLM”) and the Bureau of Indian Affairs, agencies under the authority of the U.S. Department of the Interior, which govern and restrict aspects of oil and natural-gas operations on federal and Native American lands, including the imposition of liabilities for pollution damages and pollution clean-up costs resulting from such operations; |
• | the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, which imposes liability on generators, transporters, and arrangers of hazardous substances at sites where hazardous substance releases have occurred or are threatening to occur; |
• | the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, which governs the generation, treatment, storage, transport, and disposal of solid wastes, including hazardous wastes; |
• | the Safe Drinking Water Act, which regulates the quality of the nation’s public drinking water through adoption of drinking-water standards and control over the injection of waste fluids into non-producing geologic formations that may adversely affect drinking water sources; |
• | the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, which requires facilities to implement a safety-hazard communication program and disseminate information to employees, local emergency planning committees, and response departments on toxic chemical uses and inventories; |
• | OSHA, which establishes workplace standards for the protection of the health and safety of employees, including the implementation of hazard communications programs designed to inform employees about hazardous substances in the workplace, potential harmful effects of these substances, and appropriate control measures; |
• | the Endangered Species Act, which restricts activities that may affect federally identified endangered and threatened species or their habitats through the implementation of operating restrictions or a temporary, seasonal, or permanent ban in affected areas; |
• | the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to evaluate major agency actions having the potential to impact the environment and that may require the preparation of environmental assessments and more detailed environmental impact statements that may be made available for public review and comment; and |
• | U.S. Department of Transportation regulations, which relate to advancing the safe transportation of energy and hazardous materials and emergency response preparedness. |
41
Additionally, regional, state, tribal, and local jurisdictions exist in the United States where we operate that also have, or are developing or considering developing, similar environmental laws and regulations governing many of these same types of activities. While the legal requirements imposed under state law may be similar in form to federal laws and regulations, in some cases the actual implementation of these requirements may impose additional, or more stringent, conditions or controls that can significantly alter or delay the permitting, development, or expansion of a project or substantially increase the cost of doing business. These federal and state environmental laws and regulations, including new or amended legal requirements that may arise in the future to address potential environmental concerns such as air and water impacts and oil and natural-gas development in close proximity to specific occupied structures and/or certain environmentally sensitive or recreational areas, are expected to continue to have a considerable impact on our operations.
In connection with our operations, we have acquired certain properties supportive of oil and natural-gas activities from third parties whose actions with respect to the management and disposal or release of hydrocarbons, hazardous substances, or wastes were not under our control. Under environmental laws and regulations, we could incur strict joint and several liability for remediating hydrocarbons, hazardous substances, or wastes disposed of or released by prior owners or operators. We also could incur costs related to the clean-up of third-party sites to which we sent regulated substances for disposal or recycling, and for damages to natural resources or other claims related to releases of regulated substances at or from such third-party sites.
These federal and state laws and their implementing regulations generally restrict the level of pollutants emitted to ambient air, discharges to surface water, and disposals, or other releases, to surface and below-ground soils and ground water. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of sanctions, including administrative, civil, and criminal penalties; the imposition of investigatory, remedial, and corrective-action obligations or the incurrence of capital expenditures; the occurrence of delays or cancellations in the permitting, development, or expansion of projects; and the issuance of injunctions restricting or prohibiting some or all of our activities in a particular area. Moreover, there exist environmental laws that provide for citizen suits, which allow individuals and environmental organizations to act in the place of the government and sue operators for alleged violations of environmental law. See the following risk factors under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K for further discussion on environmental matters such as ozone standards, climate change, including methane or other GHG emissions, hydraulic fracturing, and other regulatory initiatives related to environmental protection: “We are subject to stringent and comprehensive environmental laws and regulations that may expose us to significant costs and liabilities,” “Adoption of new or more stringent climate-change or other air-emissions legislation or regulations restricting emissions of GHGs or other air pollutants could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the gathering, processing, compressing, treating, and transporting services we provide,” “Changes in laws or regulations regarding hydraulic fracturing could result in increased costs, operating restrictions, or delays in the completion of oil and natural-gas wells, which could decrease the need for our gathering and processing services,” and “Adoption of new or more stringent legal standards relating to induced seismic activity associated with produced-water disposal could affect our operations.” The ultimate financial impact arising from environmental laws and regulations is neither clearly known nor determinable, as existing standards are subject to change and new standards continue to evolve.
We have incurred and will continue to incur operating and capital expenditures, some of which may be material, to comply with environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations. Historically, our environmental compliance costs have not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations; however, there can be no assurance that such costs will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows in the future, or that new or more stringently applied existing laws and regulations will not materially increase our costs of doing business. Although we are not fully insured against all environmental risks, and our insurance does not cover any penalties or fines that may be issued by a governmental authority, we maintain insurance coverage that we believe sufficient based on our assessment of insurable risks and consistent with insurance coverage held by other similarly situated industry participants. Nevertheless, it is possible that other developments, such as stricter and more comprehensive environmental laws and regulations, and claims for damages to property or persons or imposition of penalties resulting from our operations, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
42
We also dispose of produced water generated from oil and natural-gas production operations. The legal standards related to the disposal of produced water into non-producing geologic formations by means of underground injection wells are subject to change based on concerns of the public or governmental authorities, including concerns relating to seismic events near injection wells used for the disposal of produced water. In response to such concerns, regulators in some states have imposed, or are considering imposing, additional requirements in the permitting of produced-water disposal wells or are otherwise investigating the existence of a relationship between seismicity and the use of such wells. Another consequence of seismic events near produced-water disposal wells is the introduction of class action lawsuits, which allege that disposal well operations have caused damage to neighboring properties or otherwise violated state and federal rules regulating waste disposal. One or more of these developments could result in additional regulation and restrictions on our use of injection wells to dispose of produced water, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, capital expenditures and operating costs, and financial condition.
TITLE TO PROPERTIES AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY
Our real property is classified into two categories: (i) parcels that we own in fee title and (ii) parcels in which our interest derives from leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits, or licenses from landowners or governmental authorities, permitting the use of such land for our operations. Portions of the land on which our plants and other major facilities are located are owned by us in fee title, and we believe that we have satisfactory title to these lands. The remainder of the land on which our plant sites and major facilities are located is held by us pursuant to surface leases between us, as lessee, and the fee owner of the lands, as lessor. We or our affiliates have leased or owned these lands for many years without any material challenge known to us relating to the title to the land upon which the assets are located, and we believe that we have satisfactory leasehold estates or fee ownership of such lands. We have no knowledge of any challenge to the underlying fee title of any material lease, easement, right-of-way, permit, or license held by us or to our title to any material lease, easement, right-of-way, permit, or lease, and we believe that we have satisfactory title to all of our material leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits, and licenses.
Some of the leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits, and licenses transferred to us by Occidental required the consent of the grantor of such rights, which in certain instances was a governmental entity. We believe we have obtained sufficient third-party consents, permits, and authorizations for the transfer of the assets necessary to enable us to operate our business in all material respects. With respect to any remaining consents, permits, or authorizations that have not been obtained, we have determined these will not have a material adverse effect on the operation of our business should we fail to obtain such consents, permits, or authorization in a reasonable time frame.
Occidental may hold record title to portions of certain assets as we make the appropriate filings in the jurisdictions in which such assets are located and obtain any consents and approvals as needed. Such consents and approvals would include those required by federal and state agencies or other political subdivisions. In some cases, Occidental temporarily holds record title to property as nominee for our benefit and in other cases may, on the basis of the expense and difficulty associated with the conveyance of title, cause its affiliates to retain title, as nominee for our benefit, until a future date. We anticipate that there will be no material change in the tax treatment of our common units resulting from Occidental holding the title to any part of such assets subject to future conveyance or as our nominee.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2019, the Services Agreement obligated us to transfer 19 employees (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information) to employment by WES and such transfer was fully effective on January 12, 2020. The officers of our general partner manage our operations and activities under the direction and supervision of the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2019, Occidental employed 979 people who were seconded to us to provide direct support to our operations and who are anticipated to become employees of WES prior to the end of 2020. All of these employees are deemed jointly employed by Occidental and our general partner under the Services Agreement. None of these employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, and Occidental considers its employee relations to be satisfactory.
43
Item 1A. Risk Factors
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We have made in this Form 10-K, and may from time to time make in other public filings, press releases, and statements by management, forward-looking statements concerning our operations, economic performance, and financial condition. These forward-looking statements include statements preceded by, followed by, or that otherwise include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “target,” “goal,” “plans,” “objective,” “should,” or similar expressions or variations on such expressions. These statements discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of operations or financial condition, or include other “forward-looking” information.
Although we and our general partner believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, neither we nor our general partner can provide any assurance that such expectations will prove correct. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations include, but are not limited to, the following:
• | our ability to pay distributions to our unitholders; |
• | our assumptions about the energy market; |
• | future throughput (including Occidental production) that is gathered or processed by, or transported through our assets; |
• | our operating results; |
• | competitive conditions; |
• | technology; |
• | the availability of capital resources to fund acquisitions, capital expenditures, and other contractual obligations, and our ability to access financing through the debt or equity capital markets; |
• | the supply of, demand for, and price of, oil, natural gas, NGLs, and related products or services; |
• | commodity-price risks inherent in percent-of-proceeds, percent-of-product, and keep-whole contracts; |
• | weather and natural disasters; |
• | inflation; |
• | the availability of goods and services; |
• | general economic conditions, internationally, domestically, or in the jurisdictions in which we are doing business; |
• | federal, state, and local laws and state-approved voter ballot initiatives, including those laws or ballot initiatives that limit producers’ hydraulic-fracturing activities or other oil and natural-gas development or operations; |
• | environmental liabilities; |
• | legislative or regulatory changes, including changes affecting our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes; |
• | changes in the financial or operational condition of Occidental; |
• | the creditworthiness of Occidental or our other counterparties, including financial institutions, operating partners, and other parties; |
44
• | changes in Occidental’s capital program, corporate strategy, or other desired areas of focus; |
• | our commitments to capital projects; |
• | our ability to access liquidity under the RCF; |
• | our ability to repay debt; |
• | conflicts of interest among us, our general partner and its affiliates, including Occidental, with respect to, among other things, the allocation of capital and operational and administrative costs, and our future business opportunities; |
• | our ability to maintain and/or obtain rights to operate our assets on land owned by third parties; |
• | our ability to acquire assets on acceptable terms from third parties; |
• | non-payment or non-performance of significant customers, including under gathering, processing, transportation, and disposal agreements and the $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko; |
• | the timing, amount, and terms of future issuances of equity and debt securities; |
• | the outcome of pending and future regulatory, legislative, or other proceedings or investigations, and continued or additional disruptions in operations that may occur as we and our customers comply with any regulatory orders or other state or local changes in laws or regulations; and |
• | other factors discussed below and elsewhere in this Item 1A, under the caption Critical Accounting Estimates included under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K, and in our other public filings and press releases. |
Risk factors and other factors noted throughout this Form 10-K could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Common units are inherently different from capital stock of a corporation, although many of the business risks to which we are subject are similar to those that would be faced by a corporation engaged in similar businesses. We urge you to carefully consider the following risk factors together with all of the other information included in this Form 10-K in evaluating an investment in our common units.
If any of the following risks were to occur, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of the common units could decline and you could lose part or all of your investment.
45
RISKS INHERENT IN OUR BUSINESS
We are dependent on Occidental for over 50% of revenues related to the natural gas, crude oil, NGLs, and produced water that we gather, treat, process, transport, and/or dispose. A material reduction in Occidental’s production that is gathered, treated, processed, or transported by our assets would result in a material decline in our revenues and cash available for distribution.
We rely on Occidental for over 50% of revenues related to the natural gas, crude oil, NGLs, and produced water that we gather, treat, process, transport, and/or dispose. For the year ended December 31, 2019, 59% of Total revenues and other, 38% of our throughput for natural-gas assets (excluding equity-investment throughput), and 83% of our throughput for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets (excluding equity-investment throughput) were attributable to transactions with Occidental. Occidental may decrease its production in the areas serviced by us and is under no contractual obligation to maintain its production volumes dedicated to us pursuant to the terms of our applicable gathering agreements. The loss of a significant portion of production volumes supplied by Occidental would result in a material decline in our revenues and our cash available for distribution. In addition, Occidental may determine that drilling activity in areas other than our areas of operation is strategically more attractive. A shift in Occidental’s focus away from our areas of operation could result in reduced throughput on our systems and a material decline in our revenues and cash available for distribution.
Following the closing of the Occidental Merger and the execution of the December 2019 Agreements, Occidental owns our general partner. Occidental’s ownership of our general partner may result in conflicts of interest.
Following the closing of the Occidental Merger, the directors and officers of our general partner and its affiliates have duties to manage our general partner in a manner that is beneficial to Occidental, who is the indirect owner of our general partner. At the same time, our general partner has duties to manage us in a manner that is beneficial to our unitholders. Therefore, our general partner’s duties to us may conflict with the duties of its officers and directors to Occidental. As a result of these conflicts of interest, our general partner may favor the interests of Occidental or its owners or affiliates over the interest of our unitholders.
Now that the Occidental Merger has been completed, our future prospects will depend on Occidental’s growth strategy, midstream operational philosophy, and drilling program, including the level of drilling and completion activity by Occidental on acreage dedicated to us. Additional conflicts also may arise in the future associated with future business opportunities that are pursued by Occidental and us.
Because we are dependent on Occidental as our largest customer and the owner of our general partner, any development that materially and adversely affects Occidental’s operations, financial condition, or market reputation could have a material and adverse impact on us. Material adverse changes at Occidental could restrict our access to capital, make it more expensive to access the capital markets, or increase the costs of our borrowings.
We are dependent on Occidental as our largest customer and the owner of our general partner, and we expect to derive significant revenue from Occidental for the foreseeable future. As a result, any event, whether in our area of operations or otherwise, that adversely affects Occidental’s production, financial condition, leverage, market reputation, liquidity, results of operations, or cash flows may adversely affect our revenues and cash available for distribution. Accordingly, we are indirectly subject to the business risks of Occidental, including the following:
• | the volatility of oil and natural-gas prices, which could have a negative effect on the value of Occidental’s oil and natural-gas properties, its drilling programs, and its ability to finance its operations; |
• | the availability of capital on favorable terms to fund Occidental’s exploration and development activities; |
• | a reduction in or reallocation of Occidental’s capital budget, which could reduce the gathering, transportation, and treating volumes available to us as a midstream operator, and/or limit our opportunities for organic growth; |
• | Occidental’s ability to replace its oil and natural-gas reserves; |
• | Occidental’s operations in foreign countries, which are subject to political, economic, and other uncertainties; |
46
• | Occidental’s drilling, flowline, pipeline, and operating risks, including potential environmental liabilities; |
• | transportation-capacity constraints and interruptions; |
• | adverse effects of governmental and environmental regulation, including state-approved ballot initiatives that would change state constitutions or statutes in a manner that makes future oil and gas development in such states more difficult or expensive; |
• | shareholder activism with respect to Occidental’s stock or activities by non-governmental organizations to restrict the exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas by Occidental; and |
• | adverse effects from current or future litigation. |
Further, we are subject to the risk of non-payment or non-performance by Occidental, including with respect to our gathering and transportation agreements. We cannot predict the extent to which Occidental’s business would be impacted if conditions in the energy industry were to deteriorate further, nor can we estimate the impact such conditions would have on Occidental’s ability to perform under our gathering and transportation agreements and note receivable. Accordingly, any material non-payment or non-performance by Occidental could reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.
Any material limitations to our ability to access capital as a result of adverse changes at Occidental could limit our ability to obtain future financing on favorable terms, or at all, or could result in increased financing costs in the future. Similarly, material adverse changes at Occidental could impact our unit price adversely, thereby limiting our ability to raise capital through equity issuances or debt financing, or adversely affect our ability to engage in or expand or pursue our business activities, and also prevent us from engaging in certain transactions that might otherwise be considered beneficial to us.
See Part I, Item 1A in Occidental’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (which is not, and shall not be deemed to be, incorporated by reference herein), for a full discussion of the risks associated with Occidental’s business.
On December 31, 2019, we entered into a set of agreements that will facilitate our ability to operate independently from Occidental. Our separation from Occidental entails risks and uncertainties that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
The difficulties of creating a stand-alone structure include, among other things:
• | implementing technology systems to manage the operations and administration of our day-to-day business; |
• | maintaining an effective system of internal controls in compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; |
• | replicating regulatory compliance and governance infrastructure: |
• | hiring, training, or retaining qualified personnel as needed to replace positions that have previously been provided as a shared service by Occidental; |
• | identifying and filling gaps in management functions and expertise and establishing effective communication and information exchange among management teams and employees; |
• | diverting management’s attention from our existing business; and |
• | potentially losing business or key employees. |
If any of these risks or other unanticipated liabilities or costs were to materialize, then desired benefits from our efforts to become independent from Occidental may not materialize. Such difficulties may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
47
Any future credit-rating downgrade could negatively impact our cost of and ability to access capital.
Our costs of borrowing and ability to access the capital markets are affected by market conditions and the credit rating assigned to WES Operating’s debt by the major credit rating agencies. As of December 31, 2019, WES Operating’s long-term debt was rated “BBB-” by Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”), “BBB-” by Fitch Ratings, and “Ba1” by Moody’s Investors Service. In October 2019, S&P changed its outlook on WES Operating’s credit rating from “developing” to “negative.” Any future downgrades in WES Operating’s credit ratings could adversely affect WES Operating’s ability to issue debt in the public debt markets and negatively impact our cost of capital, future interest costs, and ability to effectively execute aspects of our business strategy.
Future credit-rating downgrades also could trigger obligations to provide financial assurance of our performance under certain contractual arrangements. We may be required to post collateral in the form of letters of credit or cash as financial assurance of our performance under certain contractual arrangements, such as pipeline transportation contracts and NGLs and gas-sales contracts. At December 31, 2019, there were $4.6 million in letters of credit or cash-provided assurance of our performance under contractual arrangements with credit-risk-related contingent features.
Sustained low natural-gas, NGLs, or oil prices could adversely affect our business.
Sustained low natural-gas, NGLs, or oil prices impact natural-gas and oil exploration and production activity levels and can result in a decline in the production of hydrocarbons over the medium to long term, resulting in reduced throughput on our systems. Such declines also potentially affect the ability of our vendors, suppliers, and customers to continue operations. As a result, sustained lower natural-gas and crude-oil prices could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and our ability to pay cash distributions to our unitholders.
In general terms, the prices of natural gas, oil, condensate, NGLs, and other hydrocarbon products fluctuate in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty, and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. For example, market prices for natural gas have declined substantially from the highs achieved in 2008 and have remained depressed for several years. More recently, uncertain global demand for crude oil and the increased supply resulting from the rapid development of shale plays throughout North America have contributed significantly to a substantial decline in crude-oil prices. Rapid development of the North American shale plays also has increased the supply of natural gas contributing to a substantial drop in natural-gas prices. Additional factors impacting commodity prices include:
• | domestic and worldwide economic and geopolitical conditions; |
• | weather conditions and seasonal trends; |
• | the ability to develop recently discovered fields or deploy new technologies to existing fields; |
• | the levels of domestic production and consumer demand, as affected by, among other things, concerns over inflation, geopolitical issues, and the availability and cost of credit; |
• | the availability of imported, or a market for exported, liquefied natural gas; |
• | the availability of transportation systems with adequate capacity; |
• | the volatility and uncertainty of regional pricing differentials, such as in the Rocky Mountains; |
• | the price and availability of alternative fuels; |
• | the effect of energy conservation measures; |
• | the nature and extent of governmental regulation and taxation; and |
• | the forecasted supply and demand for, and prices of, oil, natural gas, NGLs, and other commodities. |
48
Because of the natural decline in production from existing wells, our success depends on our ability to obtain new sources of oil and natural-gas throughput, which is dependent on certain factors beyond our control. Any decrease in the volumes that we gather, process, treat, and transport could affect our business and operating results adversely.
The volumes that support our business are dependent on, among other things, the level of production from natural-gas and oil wells connected to our gathering systems and processing and treating facilities. This production will naturally decline over time. As a result, our cash flows associated with production from these wells also will decline over time. To maintain or increase throughput levels on our systems, we must obtain new sources of oil and natural-gas throughput. The primary factors affecting our ability to obtain sources of oil and natural-gas throughput include (i) the level of successful drilling activity near our systems, (ii) our ability to compete for volumes from successful new wells to the extent such wells are not dedicated to our systems, and (iii) our ability to capture volumes currently gathered or processed by third parties.
While Occidental has dedicated production from certain of its properties to us, we have no control over the level of drilling activity in our areas of operation, the amount of reserves associated with wells connected to our systems, or the rate at which production declines. We also have no control over producers or their drilling or production decisions, which are affected by, among other things, the availability and cost of capital, prevailing and projected commodity prices, demand for hydrocarbons, levels of reserves, geological considerations, governmental regulations, the availability of drilling rigs, and other production and development costs. Fluctuations in commodity prices also affect producers’ investments in the development of new oil and natural-gas reserves. Declines in oil and natural-gas prices have reduced exploration, development, and production activity materially in some regions and, if sustained, could lead to further decreases in such activities. Sustained reductions in exploration or production activity in our areas of operation would lead to reduced utilization of our gathering, processing, and treating assets.
Because of these factors, known oil and natural-gas reserves existing in areas served by our assets may deter producers (including Occidental) from developing those reserves. Moreover, Occidental may not develop the acreage it has dedicated to us. If competition or reductions in drilling activity result in our inability to maintain the current levels of throughput on our systems, it could reduce our revenue and impair our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.
We may not have sufficient cash from operations following the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses, including cost reimbursements to our general partner, to enable us to pay distributions at previously announced levels to holders of our common units.
To pay the announced fourth quarter 2019 distribution of $0.62200 per unit per quarter, or $2.48800 per unit per year, we require per-quarter available cash of $281.8 million, or $1.1 billion per year, based on the number of common units outstanding at January 31, 2020. We may not have sufficient available cash from operating surplus each quarter to enable us to pay distributions at currently announced levels. The amount of cash we can distribute on our units principally depends on the amount of cash we generate from our operations, which will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on, among other things:
• | the prices of, level of production of, and demand for oil and natural gas; |
• | the volume of oil, NGLs, natural gas, and produced water we gather, compress, process, treat, dispose, and/or transport; |
• | the volumes and prices of NGLs and condensate that we retain and sell; |
• | demand charges and volumetric fees associated with our transportation services; |
• | the level of competition from other midstream companies; |
• | regulatory action affecting the supply of or demand for oil or natural gas, the rates we can charge, how we contract for services, our existing contracts, our operating costs, or our operating flexibility; and |
• | prevailing economic conditions. |
49
In addition, the actual amount of cash available for distribution will depend on other factors, some of which are beyond our control, including the following:
• | our level of capital expenditures; |
• | our level of operating and maintenance and general and administrative costs; |
• | our debt-service requirements and other liabilities; |
• | fluctuations in our working capital needs; |
• | our ability to borrow funds and access capital markets; |
• | our continued treatment as a flow-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes; |
• | restrictions contained in debt agreements to which we are a party; and |
• | the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner. |
We are exposed to the credit risk of third-party customers, and any material non-payment or non-performance by these parties, including with respect to our gathering, processing, transportation, and disposal agreements, could reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.
On some of our systems, we rely on third-party customers for substantially all of our revenues related to those assets. The loss of a portion or all of these customers’ contracted volumes, as a result of competition, creditworthiness, inability to negotiate extensions, replacements of contracts, or otherwise, could reduce our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders. Further, to the extent any of our third-party customers is in financial distress or enters bankruptcy proceedings, the related customer contracts may be renegotiated at lower rates or altogether rejected. For example, Sanchez Energy Corporation, which is the upstream operator for substantially all of the natural gas, crude oil, and NGLs that we gather and process in the Eagleford Basin, and which, for the year ended December 31, 2019, directly represents 9% of our natural-gas gathering, treating, and transportation volumes, 1% of our crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water volumes (excluding equity-investment volumes), and directly and indirectly 6% of our natural-gas processing volumes, filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on August 12, 2019. As a result, our earnings in the Eagleford Basin could be materially and adversely impacted, which also may result in impairments to the carrying value of our Eagleford assets.
Our strategies to reduce our exposure to changes in commodity prices may fail to protect us and could impact our financial condition negatively, thereby reducing our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to unitholders.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, 93% of our wellhead natural-gas volume (excluding equity investments) and 100% of our crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water throughput (excluding equity investments) were serviced under fee-based contracts under which fixed and variable fees are received based on the volume or thermal content of the natural gas and on the volume of NGLs, crude oil, and produced water we gather, process, treat, transport, or dispose.
We pursue various strategies to reduce our exposure to adverse changes in the prices for natural gas, condensate, and NGLs. These strategies vary in scope based on the level and volatility of natural-gas, condensate, and NGLs prices and other changing market conditions. To the extent that we engage in price-risk management activities such as the commodity-price swap agreements, we may be prevented from realizing the full impact of price increases above the levels set in those agreements. In addition, our commodity-price management may expose us to the risk of financial loss in certain circumstances, including if counterparties to our hedging or other price-risk management contracts fail to perform under those arrangements.
Additionally, if we are unable to manage risks associated with our contracts that have commodity-price exposure effectively, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.
50
Implementation of new Colorado Senate Bill 19-181 may increase costs and limit oil and natural-gas exploration and production operations in the state, which could have a material adverse effect on our customers in Colorado and significantly reduce demand for our services in the state.
On April 16, 2019, Senate Bill 19-181 was signed into law in Colorado. The new legislation reforms oversight of oil and natural-gas exploration and production activities in the state. The mission of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (“COGCC”) has changed from fostering energy development in the state to regulating the industry in a manner that is protective of public health and safety and the environment. The new legislation also authorizes Colorado cities and counties to assume an increased role in regulating oil and natural-gas operations within their jurisdictions in a manner that may be more stringent than state-level rules, and a few local governments have passed temporary moratoria on new oil and natural-gas projects until local governments have passed their own rules implementing the new law. The composition of the COGCC commissioners also has been changed under the new law, with the COGCC adding a commissioner with public health expertise. The COGCC now is tasked with undertaking several reviews of existing regulations and new or amended rulemakings, with priority given to implementing the new public health, safety, and environmental priorities; cumulative impacts; and local government assistance and interaction. Moreover, the new law requires the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment’s Air Division to adopt additional air-quality rules to minimize emissions from oil and natural-gas activities. While the COGCC already has rejected calls for a complete moratorium on new oil and natural-gas projects, it issued a set of “Objective Criteria” in May 2019, which calls for the COGCC to determine whether a pending permit will be subject to “additional review” to determine compliance with Senate Bill 19-181, pending completion of certain COGCC rulemakings necessary to implement the new law. Timing for issuance of new or amended rules pursuant to Senate Bill 19-181 is currently unknown, with hearings initiated in late 2019 and extending into 2020. Implementation of this new law could limit operations as a result of delays by the state in issuing new drilling permits, and result in increased operational costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our customers in Colorado, which in turn could reduce statewide demand for our midstream services significantly.
Changes in laws or regulations regarding hydraulic fracturing could result in increased costs, operating restrictions, or delays in the completion of oil and natural-gas wells, which could decrease the need for our gathering and processing services.
While we do not conduct hydraulic fracturing, our oil and natural-gas exploration and production customers do conduct such activities. Hydraulic fracturing is an essential and common practice used by many of our customers to stimulate production of natural gas and oil from dense subsurface rock formations such as shales. Hydraulic fracturing is typically regulated by state oil and natural-gas commissions, but several federal agencies, including the EPA and the BLM, also have asserted regulatory authority over, proposed or promulgated regulations governing, and conducted investigations relating to certain aspects of the hydraulic-fracturing process. For example, in late 2016, the EPA released its final report on the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources, concluding that “water cycle” activities associated with hydraulic fracturing may impact drinking water resources under certain circumstances. Additionally, in 2016, the EPA published an effluent-limit guideline final rule prohibiting the discharge of wastewater from onshore unconventional oil and gas extraction facilities to publicly owned wastewater treatment plants. Moreover, Congress has from time to time considered the adoption of legislation to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing.
At the state level, some states have adopted, and others are considering adopting, legal requirements that could impose more stringent disclosure, permitting, or well-construction requirements on hydraulic-fracturing operations, and states could elect to prohibit high-volume hydraulic fracturing altogether, following the approach taken by the State of New York. Local governments also may seek to adopt ordinances within their jurisdictions regulating the time, place, and manner of drilling activities in general or hydraulic-fracturing activities in particular. Moreover, non-governmental organizations may seek to restrict hydraulic fracturing. Such was the case in Colorado where certain interest groups therein unsuccessfully pursued ballot initiatives in recent general election cycles that would have revised the state constitution or state statutes in a manner that would have made future exploration and production activities in the state more difficult or expensive, including, for example, by increasing mandatory setback distances of oil and natural-gas operations from specific occupied structures and/or certain environmentally sensitive or recreational areas.
51
If new or more-stringent federal, state, or local legal restrictions, prohibitions or regulations, or ballot initiatives relating to the hydraulic-fracturing process are adopted in areas where our oil and natural-gas exploration and production customers operate, those customers could incur potentially significant added costs to comply with such requirements and experience delays or curtailment in the pursuit of exploration, development, or production activities, which could reduce demand for our gathering and processing services. Moreover, increased regulation of the hydraulic-fracturing process also could lead to greater opposition to, and litigation over, oil and natural-gas production activities using hydraulic-fracturing techniques. Any one or more of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Adoption of new or more stringent legal standards relating to induced seismic activity associated with produced-water disposal could affect our operations.
We dispose of produced water generated from oil and natural-gas production operations. The legal requirements related to the disposal of produced water into a non-producing geologic formation by means of underground injection wells are subject to change based on concerns of the public or governmental authorities, including concerns relating to recent seismic events near injection wells used for the disposal of produced water. In response to such concerns, regulators in some states have imposed, or are considering imposing, additional requirements in the permitting of produced-water disposal wells or are otherwise investigating the existence of a relationship between seismicity and the use of such wells. For example, Colorado developed and follows guidance when issuing underground injection control permits to limit the maximum injection pressure, rate, and volume of water. Oklahoma has issued rules for wastewater disposal wells that impose certain permitting and operating restrictions and reporting requirements on disposal wells in proximity to faults, and also is developing and implementing plans directing certain wells where seismic incidents have occurred to restrict or suspend disposal-well operations. The Texas Railroad Commission also has adopted similar permitting, operating, and reporting rules for disposal wells. Another consequence of seismic events may be class action lawsuits, alleging that disposal-well operations have caused damage to neighboring properties or otherwise violated state and federal rules regulating waste disposal. These developments could result in additional regulation and restrictions on our use of injection wells to dispose of produced water, including a possible shut down of wells, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Adverse developments in our geographic areas of operation could disproportionately impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.
Our business and operations are concentrated in a limited number of producing areas. Due to our limited geographic diversification, adverse operational developments, regulatory or legislative changes, or other events in an area in which we have significant operations could have a greater impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders than if our operations were more diversified.
We may not be able to obtain funding on acceptable terms or at all. This may hinder or prevent us from meeting our future capital needs.
Global financial markets and economic conditions have been, and continue to be, volatile, especially for companies involved in the oil and gas industry. The repricing of credit risk and the recent relatively weak industry conditions have made, and will likely continue to make, it difficult for some entities to obtain funding. In addition, as a result of concerns about the stability and solvency of some of our counterparties, the cost of obtaining financing from the credit markets generally has increased as many lenders and institutional investors have increased required rates of return, enacted tighter lending standards, refused to provide funding on terms similar to the borrower’s current debt, and reduced, or in some cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers. Further, we may be unable to obtain adequate funding under the RCF if our lending counterparties become unable to meet their funding obligations. Due to these factors, we cannot be certain that funding will be available if needed and to the extent required on acceptable terms. If funding is not available when needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to execute our business plans, complete acquisitions or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.
52
Restrictions in the indentures governing our publicly traded notes (collectively, the “Notes”) or the RCF may limit our ability to capitalize on acquisitions and other business opportunities.
The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in the agreements governing the Notes, the RCF, and any future financing arrangements could restrict our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to expand or pursue business activities associated with our subsidiaries and equity investments. The RCF contains, and with respect to the second, fourth and fifth bullets below, the indentures governing the Notes contain, covenants that restrict or limit our ability to do the following:
• | incur additional indebtedness or guarantee other indebtedness; |
• | grant liens to secure obligations other than our obligations under the Notes or RCF or agree to restrictions on our ability to grant additional liens to secure our obligations under the Notes or RCF; |
• | engage in transactions with affiliates; |
• | make any material change to the nature of our business from the midstream business; or |
• | enter into a merger, consolidate, liquidate, wind up, or dissolve. |
The RCF also contains various customary covenants, certain events of default, and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter (which is defined as the ratio of consolidated indebtedness as of the last day of a fiscal quarter to Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the RCF, for the most-recent four-consecutive fiscal quarters ending on such day) of 5.0 to 1.0, or a consolidated leverage ratio of 5.5 to 1.0 with respect to quarters ending in the 270-day period immediately following certain acquisitions. See Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K for a further discussion of the terms of the RCF and Notes.
Debt we owe or incur in the future may limit our flexibility to obtain financing and to pursue other business opportunities.
Our indebtedness could have important consequences to us, including the following:
• | our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, or other purposes may be impaired or financing may not be available on favorable terms; |
• | our funds available for operations, future business opportunities, and distributions to unitholders will be reduced by that portion of our cash flows required to make interest payments on our debt; |
• | we may be more vulnerable to competitive pressures or a downturn in our business or the economy generally; and |
• | our flexibility in responding to changing business and economic conditions may be limited. |
Our ability to service our debt will depend on, among other things, our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. If our operating results are not sufficient to service indebtedness in the future, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions; reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments, or capital expenditures; selling assets; or seeking additional equity capital. We may not be able to execute any of these actions on satisfactory terms or at all.
53
Increases in interest rates could adversely impact our unit price, our ability to issue equity or incur debt for acquisitions or other purposes, and our ability to make cash distributions at our intended levels.
Interest rates may increase in the future due to inflation, increased yields on U.S. Treasury obligations, or otherwise. In such cases, the interest rates on our floating-rate debt, including amounts outstanding under the RCF, would increase. If interest rates rise, our future financing costs could increase accordingly. In addition, as is true with other MLPs (the common units of which are often viewed by investors as yield-oriented securities), our unit price could be impacted by our implied distribution yield relative to market interest rates. The distribution yield often is used by investors to compare and rank yield-oriented securities for investment decision-making purposes. Therefore, changes in interest rates, either positive or negative, may affect the yield requirements of investors who invest in our units, and a rising interest-rate environment could have an adverse impact on our unit price, our ability to issue equity or incur debt for acquisitions or other purposes, and our ability to make cash distributions at intended levels.
Our failure to maintain an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting could adversely affect our ability to accurately report our results.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in our internal controls that result in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Effective internal control is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and deter and detect any material fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent material fraud, our reputation and operating results will be harmed. Our efforts to develop and maintain our system of internal controls and to remediate material weaknesses in our controls may not be successful, and we may be unable to maintain adequate control over our financial processes and reporting in the future, including future compliance with the obligations under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation or other effective improvement of our internal controls, could harm our operating results. Ineffective internal control also could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information.
Our business could be negatively affected by security threats, including cyber-threats, and other disruptions.
We face various security threats, including cyber-threats to the security of our facilities and infrastructure, attempts to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information or to render data or systems unusable, and terrorist acts. Additionally, destructive forms of protests and opposition by activists and other disruptions, including acts of sabotage or eco-terrorism, against oil and natural-gas development and production or midstream processing or transportation activities could potentially result in damage or injury to persons, property, or the environment, or lead to extended interruptions of our or our customers’ operations. Our implementation of various procedures and controls to monitor and mitigate security threats and to increase security for our facilities, infrastructure, and information may result in increased costs. There can be no assurance that such procedures and controls will be sufficient to prevent security breaches from occurring.
Cyber-attacks, in particular, are becoming more sophisticated and include, but are not limited to, malicious software intended to gain unauthorized access to data and systems, electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in critical systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information, and corruption of data. For example, the gathering, processing, treating, and transportation of natural gas from our gathering systems, processing facilities, and pipelines are dependent on communications among our facilities and with third-party systems that may be delivering natural gas into or receiving natural gas and other products from our facilities. Disruption of those communications, whether caused by cyber-attacks or otherwise, may disrupt our ability to deliver natural gas and control these assets.
There is no assurance that we will not suffer material losses from future cyber-attacks, and as such threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate or remediate any cyber vulnerabilities. Any terrorist or cyber-attack against, or other disruption of, our assets or computer systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.
54
The amount of cash we have available for distribution to holders of our common units depends primarily on our cash flows rather than on our profitability. As a result, we may be prevented from making distributions, even during periods in which we record net income.
The amount of cash we have available for distribution primarily depends on our cash flows and not solely on profitability as determined by GAAP, which will be affected by non-cash items. As a result, we may make cash distributions for periods in which we record losses for financial accounting purposes and may not make cash distributions for periods in which we record net earnings for financial accounting purposes.
The amount of available cash required to pay the distribution announced for the quarter ended December 31, 2019, on all of our common units was $281.8 million, or $1.1 billion per year. To the extent we do not have sufficient available cash under our partnership agreement, we may be unable to pay these distributions or similar distributions in the future.
We typically do not obtain independent evaluations of hydrocarbon reserves connected to our systems. Therefore, in the future, throughput on our systems could be less than we anticipate.
We typically do not obtain independent evaluations of hydrocarbon reserves connected to our systems. Accordingly, we do not have independent estimates of total reserves connected to our systems or the anticipated life of such reserves. If the total reserves or estimated life of the reserves connected to our systems are less than we anticipate, or the timeline for the development of reserves is greater than we anticipate, and we are unable to secure additional sources of oil and natural gas, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.
Our industry is highly competitive and increased competitive pressure could adversely affect our business and operating results.
We compete with similar enterprises in our areas of operation. Our competitors may expand or construct midstream systems that would create additional competition for the services that we provide to our customers. In addition, our customers, including Occidental, may develop their own midstream systems in lieu of using ours. Our ability to renew or replace existing contracts with our customers at rates sufficient to maintain current revenues and cash flows could be adversely affected by the activities of our competitors and our customers. All of these competitive pressures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.
Our results of operations could be adversely affected by asset impairments.
If commodity prices decline, we may be required to write down the value of our midstream properties if the estimated future cash flows from these properties fall below their respective net book values. Because we are an affiliate of Occidental, the assets we previously acquired from Anadarko were recorded at Anadarko’s carrying value prior to the transaction. Accordingly, we may be at an increased risk for impairments because the initial book values of a substantial portion of our assets do not have a direct relationship with, and in some cases could be significantly higher than, the consideration paid to acquire such assets. For example, see the discussion of material impairments in Note 8—Property, Plant, and Equipment in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Further, at December 31, 2019, we had $445.8 million of goodwill recorded on our balance sheet. Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price of a business acquired exceeds the fair market value of the tangible and separately measurable intangible net assets. In addition, similar to the carrying value of the assets we previously acquired from Anadarko, part of our goodwill is an allocated portion of Anadarko’s previously recorded goodwill that was allocated to us at the time we acquired assets from Anadarko, which was recorded as a component of the carrying value of the assets acquired from Anadarko. As a result, we may be at increased risk for impairments relative to entities who acquire assets from third parties or construct their own assets, as the carrying value of our goodwill does not reflect, and in some cases is significantly higher than, the difference between the consideration we paid for our acquisitions and the fair value of the net assets on the acquisition date.
55
Goodwill is not amortized, but instead must be tested at least annually for impairment, and more frequently when circumstances indicate a likely impairment, by applying a fair-value-based test. Goodwill is deemed impaired to the extent that its carrying amount exceeds its implied fair value. Various factors could lead to goodwill impairments, such as our inability to maintain throughput on our systems or sustained lower oil and natural-gas prices, by reducing the fair value of the associated reporting unit. Prolonged low or further declines in commodity prices and changes to producers’ drilling plans in response to lower prices could result in future impairments. Future non-cash asset impairments could negatively affect our results of operations.
If third-party pipelines or other facilities interconnected to our gathering, transportation, treating, or processing systems become partially or fully unavailable, or if the volumes we gather or transport do not meet the quality requirements of such pipelines or facilities, our revenues and cash available for distribution could be adversely affected.
Our gathering, transportation, treating, and processing systems are connected to other pipelines or facilities, the majority of which are owned by third parties. The continuing operation of such third-party pipelines or facilities is not within our control. If any of these pipelines or facilities becomes unable to transport, treat, or process crude oil, natural gas, or NGLs, or if the volumes we gather or transport do not meet the quality requirements of such pipelines or facilities, our revenues and cash available for distribution could be adversely affected.
Our interstate natural-gas and liquids transportation assets and operations are subject to regulation by FERC, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and our ability to make distributions.
Our interstate natural-gas pipelines are subject to regulation by FERC. If we fail to comply with all applicable FERC-administered statutes, rules, regulations, and orders, we could be subject to substantial penalties and fines. FERC has civil penalty authority to impose penalties for certain violations potentially in excess of $1.0 million per day for each violation. FERC also has the power to order the disgorgement of profits from transactions deemed to violate applicable statutes. For additional information, read Regulation of Operations–Interstate Natural-Gas Pipeline Regulation under Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K.
Our interstate liquids pipelines are common carriers and also are subject to regulation by FERC. For additional information, read Regulation of Operations—Interstate Liquids-Pipeline Regulation under Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K.
FERC regulation requires that common-carrier liquid-pipeline rates and interstate natural-gas pipeline rates be filed with FERC and that these rates be “just and reasonable” and not unduly discriminatory. Interested persons may challenge proposed new or changed rates, and FERC is authorized to suspend the effectiveness of such rates pending an investigation or hearing. FERC may also investigate, upon complaint or on its own motion, rates that are already in effect and may order a carrier to change its rates prospectively. Accordingly, adverse action by FERC could affect our ability to establish reasonable rates that cover operating costs and allow for a reasonable return. An adverse determination in any future rate proceeding brought by or against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash available for distribution. For example, one such matter relates to FERC’s policy regarding allowances for income taxes in determining a regulated entity’s cost of service. FERC’s Revised Policy Statement established that FERC will no longer permit master limited partnerships to recover an income tax allowance in cost-of-service rates and noted that to the extent an entity does not include an income tax allowance in cost-of-service rates, such entity may elect to exclude the accumulated deferred income tax balance from the rate calculation. This policy may result in an adverse impact on our revenues associated with the cost-of-service rates of our FERC-regulated gas and liquids pipelines. For additional information, read Regulation of Operations—Interstate Natural-Gas Pipeline Regulation and Regulation of Operations—Interstate Liquids-Pipeline Regulation under Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K.
56
A change in the jurisdictional characterization of some of our assets by federal, state, or local regulatory agencies or a change in policy by those agencies could result in increased regulation of our assets, which could cause our revenues to decline and operating expenses to increase.
We believe that our gas-gathering systems meet the traditional tests FERC has used to determine if a pipeline is a gas-gathering pipeline and is, therefore, not subject to FERC jurisdiction. FERC, however, has not made any determinations with respect to the jurisdictional status of any of these gas-gathering systems. The distinction between FERC-regulated transmission services and federally unregulated gathering services has been the subject of ongoing litigation and, over time, FERC policy concerning which activities it regulates and which activities are excluded from its regulation has changed. State regulation of gathering facilities generally includes various safety, environmental and, in some circumstances, nondiscriminatory take requirements and complaint-based rate regulation. In recent years, FERC has regulated the gas-gathering activities of interstate pipeline transmission companies more lightly, which has resulted in a number of such companies transferring gathering facilities to unregulated affiliates. As a result of these activities, natural-gas gathering may begin to receive greater regulatory scrutiny at the state and federal levels.
FERC makes jurisdictional determinations for natural-gas gathering and liquids lines on a case-by-case basis. The classification and regulation of our pipelines are subject to change based on future determinations by FERC, the courts, or Congress. A change in the jurisdictional characterization of some of our assets by federal, state, or local regulatory agencies or a change in policy by those agencies could result in increased regulation of our assets, which could cause our revenues to decline and operating expenses to increase. For additional information, read Regulation of Operations–Natural-Gas Gathering Pipeline Regulation under Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K.
Adoption of new or more stringent climate-change or other air-emissions legislation or regulations restricting emissions of GHGs or other air pollutants could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the gathering, processing, compressing, treating, and transporting services we provide.
Changes to climate-change or other air-emissions laws and regulations, or reinterpretations of enforcement or other guidance with respect thereto, that govern the areas in which we operate may impact our operations negatively. Examples of such proposed and/or final regulations or other regulatory initiatives are discussed below.
• | Ground-Level Ozone Standards. In 2015, the EPA issued a rule under the Clean Air Act, lowering the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (“NAAQS”) for ground-level ozone from 75 parts per billion to 70 parts per billion under the primary and secondary standards to provide requisite protection of public health and welfare, respectively. In 2017 and 2018, the EPA issued area designations with respect to ground-level ozone as either “attainment/unclassifiable,” “unclassifiable,” or “non-attainment.” Additionally, in November 2018, the EPA issued final requirements that apply to state, local, and tribal air agencies for implementing the 2015 NAAQS for ground-level ozone. State implementation of the revised NAAQS could, among other things, require installation of new emission controls on some of our equipment, result in longer permitting timelines, and significantly increase our capital expenditures and operating costs. |
57
• | Reduction of Methane Emissions by the Oil and Gas Industry. In 2016, the EPA published a final rule establishing new emissions standards for methane and additional standards for volatile organic compounds from certain new, modified, and reconstructed oil and natural-gas production and natural-gas processing and transmission facilities. The EPA’s rule is comprised of New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”), known as Subpart OOOOa, which require certain new, modified, or reconstructed facilities in the oil and natural-gas sector to reduce methane gas and volatile organic compound emissions. These Subpart OOOOa standards expand previously issued NSPS to, among other things, hydraulically fractured oil and natural-gas well completions, fugitive emissions from well sites and compressors, and equipment leaks at natural-gas processing plants and pneumatic pumps. In February 2018, the EPA finalized amendments to certain requirements of the 2016 final rule and, in September 2018, the agency proposed amendments that included rescission or revision of specified rule requirements, such as fugitive emission monitoring frequency. In August 2019, the EPA proposed two options for rescinding the Subpart OOOOa standards. Under the EPA’s preferred alternative, the agency would rescind the methane limits for new, reconstructed, and modified oil and natural-gas production sources while leaving in place the general emission limits for volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”) and relieve the EPA of its obligation to develop guidelines for methane emissions from existing sources. In addition, the proposal would remove from the oil and natural-gas category the natural-gas transmission and storage segment. The other proposed alternative would rescind the methane requirements of the NSPS applicable to all oil and natural-gas sources, without removing any sources from that category (and still requiring control of VOCs in general). In a separate rulemaking, the BLM published a final rule in late 2016 that requires a reduction in methane emissions by regulating venting, flaring, and leaking from oil and natural-gas operations on public lands; however, in September 2018, the BLM published a final rule rescinding most of the new requirements of the 2016 final rule and codifying the BLM’s prior approach to venting and flaring, which rescission has been challenged in federal court and remains pending. Notwithstanding the uncertainty of the 2016 rule, we have taken measures to enter into a voluntary regime, together with certain other oil and natural-gas exploration and production operators, to reduce methane emissions. At the state level, some states where we conduct operations, including Colorado, have issued requirements for the performance of leak detection programs that identify and repair methane leaks at certain oil and natural-gas sources. Compliance with these rules or with any future federal or state methane regulations could, among other things, require installation of new emission controls on some of our equipment and increase our capital expenditures and operating costs. |
• | Reduction of GHG Emissions. The U.S. Congress and the EPA, in addition to some state and regional authorities, have in recent years considered legislation or regulations to reduce emissions of GHGs. These efforts have included consideration of cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes, GHG-reporting and tracking programs, and regulations that directly limit GHG emissions from certain sources. In the absence of federal GHG-limiting legislation, the EPA has determined that GHG emissions present a danger to public health and the environment and has adopted regulations that, among other things, restrict emissions of GHGs under existing provisions of the Clean Air Act and may require the installation of “best available control technology” to limit emissions of GHGs from any new or significantly modified facilities that we may seek to construct in the future if they would otherwise emit large volumes of GHGs together with other criteria pollutants. Also, certain of our operations are subject to EPA rules requiring the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from specified onshore and offshore production sources. Additionally, in April 2016, the United States joined other countries in entering into a United Nations-sponsored non-binding agreement negotiated in Paris, France (“Paris Agreement”) for nations to limit their GHG emissions through individually determined reduction goals every five years beginning in 2020. However, in August 2017, the U.S. State Department informed the United Nations of the intent of the United States to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, and in November 2019 the United States formally initiated the withdrawal process. The implementation of substantial limitations on GHG emissions in areas where we conduct operations could result in increased compliance costs to acquire emissions allowances or comply with new regulatory or reporting requirements, which developments could adversely affect demand for oil and natural gas that our customers produce, reduce demand for our services, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operation. |
58
Derivatives legislation could have an adverse effect on our ability to use derivative instruments to reduce the effect of commodity-price, interest-rate, and other risks associated with our business.
The Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, establishes federal oversight and regulation of the over-the-counter derivatives market and entities, such as us, that participate in that market. The CFTC has finalized certain of its regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act, but others remain to be finalized or implemented. It is not possible at this time to predict when this will be accomplished or what the terms of the final rules will be, so the impact of those rules is uncertain at this time.
The Dodd-Frank Act and any new regulations could significantly increase the cost of derivative contracts, materially alter the terms of derivative contracts, and reduce the availability of derivatives to protect against risks we encounter.
We may incur significant costs and liabilities resulting from pipeline-integrity programs and related repairs.
Pursuant to authority under federal law, PHMSA has promulgated regulations requiring pipeline operators to develop and implement integrity-management programs for certain gas and hazardous liquid pipelines that, in the event of a pipeline leak or rupture, could affect HCAs, which are areas where a release could have the most significant adverse consequences, including high-population areas, certain drinking water sources, and unusually sensitive ecological areas. These regulations require the operators of covered pipelines to: (i) perform ongoing assessments of pipeline integrity; (ii) identify and characterize applicable threats to pipeline segments that could impact HCAs; (iii) improve data collection, integration, and analysis; (iv) repair and remediate the pipeline as necessary; and (v) implement preventive and mitigating actions. In addition, states have adopted regulations similar to existing PHMSA regulations for certain intrastate gas and hazardous liquid pipelines. At this time, we cannot predict the ultimate cost of compliance with these regulations, as the cost will vary significantly depending on the number and extent of any repairs or replacements of pipeline segments found to be necessary as a result of the pipeline-integrity testing. The results of these tests could cause us to incur significant and unanticipated capital and operating expenditures for repairs or replacements of pipeline segments deemed necessary to ensure the safe and reliable operation of our pipelines. Moreover, the adoption of any new legislation or regulations that impose more-stringent or costly pipeline-integrity management could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position. For additional information regarding PHMSA regulations, read Regulation of Operations—Natural-Gas Gathering Pipeline Regulation under Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K.
Federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to pipeline safety that require the use of new or more-stringent safety controls or result in more-stringent enforcement of applicable legal requirements could subject us to increased capital costs, operational delays, and costs of operation.
Legislation adopted in recent years has resulted in more-stringent mandates for pipeline safety and has charged PHMSA with developing and adopting regulations that impose increased pipeline-safety requirements on pipeline operators. In 2016, President Obama signed the 2016 Pipeline Safety Act that extended PHMSA’s statutory mandate regarding pipeline safety through 2019, expanded PHMSA’s authority to address unsafe pipeline conditions or practices that pose an imminent hazard to life, property, or the environment, and required the agency to complete certain of its outstanding mandates established under the 2011 Pipeline Safety Act. The imposition of new safety requirements pursuant to these enacted laws or any issuance or reinterpretation of guidance by PHMSA or any state agencies with respect thereto could require us to install new or modified safety controls, pursue additional capital projects, or conduct maintenance programs on an accelerated basis, any or all of which could result in our incurring increased capital expenditures and operating costs that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position. For additional information regarding PHMSA regulations, read Regulation of Operations—Natural-Gas Gathering Pipeline Regulation under Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K.
59
Additionally, while states are largely preempted by federal law from regulating pipeline safety for interstate lines, most are certified by PHMSA to assume responsibility for enforcing federal intrastate pipeline regulations and inspection of intrastate pipelines. In practice, because states can adopt stricter standards for intrastate pipelines than those imposed by the federal government for interstate lines, states vary considerably in their authority and capacity to address pipeline safety. Moreover, PHMSA and one or more state regulators, including the Texas Railroad Commission, have expanded the scope of their regulatory inspections in recent years to include certain in-plant equipment and pipelines found within NGLs fractionation facilities and associated storage facilities, to assess compliance with hazardous liquids pipeline safety requirements. To the extent that PHMSA and/or state regulatory agencies are successful in asserting their jurisdiction in this manner, midstream operators of NGLs fractionation facilities and associated storage facilities may be required to make operational changes or modifications at their facilities to meet standards beyond current OSHA and EPA requirements, where such changes or modifications may result in additional capital costs, possible operational delays, and increased costs of operation that, in some instances, may be significant.
Some portions of our pipeline systems have been in service for several decades, and we have a limited ownership history with respect to certain of our assets. There could be unknown events or conditions or increased maintenance or repair expenses, and downtime associated with our pipelines that could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Some portions of the pipeline systems that we operate were in service for many decades, prior to our purchase of these systems. Consequently, there may be historical occurrences or latent issues regarding our pipeline systems that our executive management may be unaware of and that may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. The age and condition of our pipeline systems also could result in increased maintenance or repair expenditures, and any downtime associated with increased maintenance and repair activities could materially reduce our revenue. Any significant increase in maintenance and repair expenditures or loss of revenue due to the age or condition of our pipeline systems could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We are subject to stringent and comprehensive environmental laws and regulations that may expose us to significant costs and liabilities.
Our operations are subject to stringent and comprehensive federal, tribal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection. These environmental laws and regulations may impose numerous obligations that are applicable to our operations, including: (i) the acquisition of permits to conduct regulated activities; (ii) restrictions on the types, quantities, and concentrations of materials that can be released into the environment; (iii) limitations on the generation, management, and disposal of wastes; (iv) limitations or prohibitions of construction and operating activities in environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, urban areas, wilderness regions, and other protected areas; (v) requiring capital expenditures to limit or prevent releases of materials from our pipelines and facilities; and (vi) imposition of substantial restoration and remedial liabilities and obligations with respect to abandonment of facilities and for pollution resulting from our operations or existing at our owned or operated facilities. Numerous governmental authorities, such as the EPA and analogous state agencies, have the power to enforce compliance with these laws and regulations and the permits issued under them, oftentimes requiring difficult and costly remedial or corrective actions. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations, and permits or any newly adopted legal requirements may result in the assessment of sanctions, including administrative, civil, and criminal penalties, the imposition of investigatory, remedial or corrective action obligations, the incurrence of capital expenditures, the occurrence of delays or cancellations in the permitting, development or expansion of projects, and the issuance of injunctions limiting or preventing some or all of our operations in particular areas.
60
We may incur significant environmental costs and liabilities in connection with our operations due to our handling of natural gas, crude oil, NGLs, and other petroleum products, because of pollutants from our operations emitted into ambient air or discharged or released into surface water or groundwater, and as a result of historical industry operations and waste-disposal practices. For example, an accidental release as a result of our operations could subject us to substantial liabilities arising from environmental cleanup and restoration costs, claims made by owners of the properties through which our gathering or transportation systems pass, neighboring landowners, and other third parties for personal injury, natural-resource and property damages, and fines or penalties for related violations of environmental laws or regulations. Joint and several strict liabilities may be incurred, without regard to fault, under certain of these environmental laws and regulations. In addition, stricter laws, regulations, or enforcement policies could increase our operational or compliance costs and the costs of any restoration or remedial actions that may become necessary, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Regulatory initiatives targeting the reduction of certain air pollutants, such as ground level ozone or GHGs such as methane, have been proposed and/or adopted by the EPA and, while subject to further implementation or various legal impediments, could result in increased compliance costs. The adoption of these or any other laws, regulations, or other legally enforceable mandates could increase our oil and natural-gas exploration and production customers’ operating and compliance costs and reduce the rate of production of oil or natural gas by operators with whom we have a business relationship, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, the legal requirements related to the disposal of produced water into non-producing geologic formations by means of underground injection wells are subject to change based on public and governmental-authority concerns regarding such disposal activities. One such concern relates to seismic events near injection wells used for the disposal of produced water resulting from oil and natural-gas activities. In response to concerns regarding induced seismicity, regulators in some states have imposed, or are considering imposing, additional requirements in the permitting of produced-water disposal wells or otherwise to assess any relationship between seismicity and the use of such wells. For example, Colorado developed and follows guidance when issuing underground injection-control permits to limit the maximum-injection pressure, rate, and volume of water. Oklahoma has issued rules for wastewater disposal wells that impose certain permitting and operating restrictions and reporting requirements on disposal wells in proximity to faults and also, from time to time, is developing and implementing plans directing operators of wells injecting at certain depths where seismic incidents have occurred to restrict or suspend disposal-well operations. The Texas Railroad Commission has adopted similar permitting, operating, and reporting rules for disposal wells. Another consequence of seismic events may be class action lawsuits alleging that disposal-well operations have caused damage to neighboring properties or otherwise violated state and federal rules regulating waste disposal. One or more of these developments could result in additional regulation and restrictions on our use of injection wells, which could have a material adverse effect on our capital expenditures and operating costs, financial condition, and results of operations.
61
Our construction of new assets may not result in revenue increases and is subject to regulatory, environmental, political, legal, and economic risks, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
One of the ways we intend to grow our business is through the construction of new midstream assets. The construction of additions or modifications to our existing systems and the construction of new midstream assets involve numerous regulatory, environmental, political, and legal uncertainties that are beyond our control. These uncertainties also could affect downstream assets, which we do not own or control, but which are critical to certain of our growth projects. Delays in the completion of new downstream assets, or the unavailability of existing downstream assets, due to environmental, regulatory, or political considerations, could have an adverse impact on the completion or utilization of our growth projects. In addition, construction activities could be subject to state, county, and local ordinances that restrict the time, place, or manner in which those activities may be conducted. Construction projects also may require the expenditure of significant amounts of capital and financing may not be available on economically acceptable terms or at all. If we undertake these projects, they may not be completed on schedule, at the budgeted cost, or at all. For example, construction activities may be delayed or require greater capital investment if the commodity prices of certain supplies such as steel pipe increase due to foreign tariffs. In addition, our revenues may not increase immediately upon the expenditure of funds on a particular project. For instance, if we expand a pipeline, the construction may occur over an extended period of time, yet we will not receive any material increases in revenues until the project is completed. Moreover, we could construct facilities to capture anticipated future growth in production in a region in which such growth does not materialize. Since we are not engaged in the exploration for and development of natural-gas and oil reserves, we often do not have access to estimates of potential reserves in an area prior to constructing facilities in that area. To the extent we rely on estimates of future production in our decision to construct additions to our systems, such estimates may prove to be inaccurate as a result of the numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of future production. As a result, new facilities may not be able to attract enough throughput to achieve our expected investment return, which could affect our results of operations and financial condition adversely. In addition, the construction of additions to our existing assets may require us to obtain new rights-of-way. We may be unable to obtain such rights-of-way and may, therefore, be unable to connect new natural-gas volumes to our systems or capitalize on other attractive expansion opportunities. Additionally, it may become more expensive for us to obtain new rights-of-way or to renew existing rights-of-way. If the cost of renewing existing or obtaining new rights-of-way increases, our cash flows could be affected adversely.
We have partial ownership interests in several joint-venture legal entities that we do not operate or control. As a result, among other things, we may be unable to control the amount of cash we receive or retain from the operation of these entities, and we could be required to contribute significant cash to fund our share of joint-venture operations, which could affect our ability to distribute cash to our unitholders adversely.
Our inability, or limited ability, to control the operations and/or management of joint-venture legal entities in which we have a partial ownership interest may result in our receiving or retaining less cash than we expect. We also may be unable, or limited in our ability, to cause any such entity to effect significant transactions such as large expenditures or contractual commitments, the construction or acquisition of assets, or the borrowing of money.
In addition, for the equity investments in which we have a minority ownership interest, we are unable to control ongoing operational decisions, including the incurrence of capital expenditures or additional indebtedness that we may be required to fund. Further, the other owners of our equity investments may establish reserves for working capital, capital projects, environmental matters, and legal proceedings, that would similarly reduce the amount of cash available for distribution. Any of the above could impact our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders adversely.
Further, in connection with the acquisition of our membership interest in Chipeta, we became party to the Chipeta LLC agreement. Among other things, the Chipeta LLC agreement provides that to the extent available, Chipeta will distribute available cash, as defined in the Chipeta LLC agreement, to its members quarterly in accordance with those members’ membership interests. Accordingly, we are required to distribute a portion of Chipeta’s cash balances, which are included in the cash balances in our consolidated balance sheets, to the other Chipeta member.
62
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and facilities are located, which could result in disruptions to our operations.
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and facilities have been constructed, and we therefore are, subject to the possibility of more onerous terms and/or increased costs to retain necessary land use if we do not have valid rights-of-way or if such rights-of-way lapse or terminate. We obtain the rights to construct and operate our pipelines on land owned by third parties and governmental agencies for a specific period of time. We cannot guarantee that we always will be able to renew existing rights-of-way or obtain new rights-of-way without experiencing significant costs. Any loss of rights with respect to our real property, through our inability to renew existing rights-of-way contracts or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position, and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.
Our business involves many hazards and operational risks, some of which may not be fully covered by insurance. If a significant accident or event occurs for which we are not fully insured, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected.
Our operations are subject to all of the risks and hazards inherent in gathering, processing, compressing, treating, and transporting natural gas, crude oil, NGLs, and produced water, including the following:
• | damage to pipelines and plants, related equipment and surrounding properties caused by hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, fires, and other natural disasters, and acts of terrorism; |
• | inadvertent damage from construction, farm, and utility equipment; |
• | leaks or losses of hydrocarbons or produced water as a result of the malfunction of equipment or facilities; |
• | fires and explosions (for example, see Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results, under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of the incident at the DBM complex); and |
• | other hazards that could also result in personal injury, loss of life, pollution, property or natural resource damages, and/or curtailment or suspension of operations. |
These risks could result in substantial losses due to personal injury and/or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment, and pollution or other environmental or natural-resource damage. These risks also may result in curtailment or suspension of our operations. A natural disaster or other hazard affecting the areas in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our operations. We are not fully insured against all risks that may occur in our business. In addition, although we are insured for environmental pollution resulting from environmental accidents that occur on a sudden and accidental basis, we may not be insured against all environmental accidents that might occur, some of which may result in toxic tort claims. If a significant accident or event occurs for which we are not fully insured, it could adversely affect our operations and financial condition. Furthermore, we may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount we desire at reasonable rates. As a result of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain of our insurance policies may substantially increase. In some instances, certain insurance could become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. Additionally, we may be unable to recover from prior owners of our assets, pursuant to certain indemnification rights, for potential environmental liabilities.
Any acquisitions we pursue create additional execution and other risks and may or otherwise fail to meet our expectations.
Any future acquisitions involve potential additional risks, which may be of a different nature or magnitude from those currently affecting our business, including the following:
• | mistaken assumptions about volumes or the timing of the delivery of volumes, revenues or costs, including synergies; |
• | an inability to successfully integrate the acquired assets or businesses; |
63
• | the assumption of unknown liabilities, including environmental liabilities; |
• | limitations on rights to indemnity from the seller; |
• | mistaken assumptions about the overall costs of equity or debt; |
• | the diversion of management’s and employees’ attention to other business concerns; |
• | unforeseen difficulties operating in new geographic areas; and |
• | customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses. |
If we consummate any future acquisitions, our capital structure and results of operations may change significantly.
We are subject to increasing scrutiny from institutional investors with respect to our governance structure and the social cost of our industry, which may adversely impact our ability to raise capital from such investors.
In recent years, certain institutional investors, including public pension funds, have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) matters. ESG initiatives generally seek to divert investment capital from companies involved in certain industries or with disfavored governance structures. The energy industry as a whole has received the attention of such activists, as have companies with our partnership governance model.
Investors’ increased focus and activism related to ESG and similar matters may constrain our ability to raise capital. Any material limitations on our ability to access capital as a result of such scrutiny could limit our ability to obtain future financing on favorable terms, or at all, or could result in increased financing costs in the future. Similarly, such activism could negatively impact our unit price, limiting our ability to raise capital through equity issuances or debt financing, or could negatively affect our ability to engage in, expand or pursue our or its business activities, and could also prevent us from engaging in certain transactions that might otherwise be considered beneficial to us.
The loss of, or difficulty in attracting and retaining, experienced personnel could reduce our competitiveness and prospects for future success.
The successful execution of our growth strategy and other activities integral to our operations depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain experienced engineering, operating, commercial, and other professionals. Competition for such professionals historically has been intense. If we cannot retain our technical personnel or attract additional experienced technical personnel, our ability to compete could be adversely impacted.
64
RISKS INHERENT IN AN INVESTMENT IN US
Occidental owns our general partner, which has sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our operations. Occidental and our general partner have conflicts of interest with, and may favor Occidental’s interests to the detriment of our unitholders.
Occidental, the owner of our general partner, owns a 53.4% limited partner interest in us. Conflicts of interest may arise between (i) Occidental and our general partner and (ii) us and our unitholders. In resolving these conflicts of interest, our general partner may favor its own interests and the interests of Occidental over our interests and the interests of our unitholders. These conflicts include, among others, the following situations:
• | Neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement requires Occidental to pursue a business strategy that favors us. |
• | Occidental is not limited in its ability to compete with us and may offer business opportunities or sell midstream assets to parties other than us. |
• | Our general partner is allowed to take into account the interests of parties other than us, such as Occidental, in resolving conflicts of interest. |
• | Our partnership agreement limits the liability of, and reduces the default state law fiduciary duties owed by, our general partner, and also restricts the remedies available to our unitholders for actions that, without the limitations, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty under state law. |
• | Except in limited circumstances, our general partner has the power and authority to conduct our business without unitholder approval. |
• | Our general partner determines the amount and timing of asset purchases and sales, borrowings, issuance of additional partnership securities and the creation, reduction or increase of reserves, each of which can affect the amount of cash that is distributed to our unitholders. |
• | Our general partner may cause us to borrow funds in order to permit the payment of cash distributions. |
• | Our partnership agreement does not restrict our general partner from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services rendered to us or entering into additional contractual arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf. |
• | Our general partner has limited, and intends to continue to limit, its liability regarding our contractual and other obligations. |
• | Our general partner controls the enforcement of the obligations that it and its affiliates owe to us. |
Read Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
65
A reduction in Occidental’s ownership interest in us may reduce its incentive to support our operations.
As discussed in WES and WES Operating’s Relationship with Occidental Petroleum Corporation in Part I, Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K, we believe that one of our principal strengths is our relationship with Occidental, and that Occidental, through its significant economic interest in us, will continue to be motivated to promote and support the successful execution of our business plan and to pursue projects that enhance the value of our business. To the extent Occidental’s net interest in us declines through the sale of its holdings or otherwise, Occidental may be less incentivized to support the continued growth of our business. Accordingly, a decrease in Occidental’s net holdings in us could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position, and ability to grow or make cash distributions to our unitholders.
Occidental is not limited in its ability to compete with us, which could limit our ability to grow and could affect our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders adversely.
Occidental is not prohibited from owning assets or engaging in businesses that directly or indirectly compete with us. In addition, in the future, Occidental may acquire, construct, or dispose of additional midstream or other assets and may be presented with new business opportunities, without any obligation to offer us the opportunity to participate in such transactions.
Cost reimbursements due to Occidental and our general partner for services provided to us or on our behalf are substantial and reduce our cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
Prior to making distributions on our common units, we reimburse Occidental, which owns our general partner, and its affiliates for expenses incurred on our behalf as determined by our general partner pursuant to the Services Agreement. These expenses include all costs incurred by Occidental and our general partner in managing and operating us, and the reimbursement of certain general and administrative expenses we incur as a result of being a publicly traded partnership. Our partnership agreement and the Services Agreement provide that Occidental will determine in good faith the expenses that are allocable to us. Our general partner may, in good faith, significantly increase the amount of reimbursable general and administrative expenses in the future and any decision to do so would reduce the amount of cash otherwise available for distribution to our unitholders.
If you are not an Eligible Holder, you may not receive distributions or allocations of income or loss on your common units and your common units will be subject to redemption.
We have adopted certain requirements regarding investors that own our common units. Eligible Holders are U.S. individuals or entities subject to U.S. federal income taxation on the income generated by us or entities not subject to U.S. federal income taxation on the income generated by us, so long as all of the entity’s owners are U.S. individuals or entities subject to U.S. taxation. If you are not an Eligible Holder, our general partner may elect not to make distributions or allocate income or loss on your units and you bear the risk of having your units redeemed by us at the lower of your purchase-price cost and the then-current market price. The redemption price will be paid in cash or by delivery of a promissory note, as determined by our general partner.
Our general partner’s liability regarding our obligations is limited.
Our general partner has included provisions in its and our contractual arrangements that limit its liability so that the counterparties to such arrangements have recourse only against our assets, and not against our general partner or its assets. Our general partner may, therefore, cause us to incur indebtedness or other obligations that are nonrecourse to our general partner. Our partnership agreement provides that any action taken by our general partner to limit its liability is not a breach of our general partner’s duties, even if we could have obtained more favorable terms without the limitation on liability. In addition, we are obligated to reimburse or indemnify our general partner to the extent that it incurs obligations on our behalf. Any such reimbursement or indemnification payments would reduce the amount of cash otherwise available for distribution to our unitholders.
66
Our partnership agreement limits our general partner’s fiduciary duties to holders of our common units.
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that modify and reduce the fiduciary standards to which our general partner otherwise would be held by state fiduciary duty law. For example, our partnership agreement permits our general partner to make a number of decisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our general partner, or otherwise free of fiduciary duties to us and our unitholders. This entitles our general partner only to consider the interests and factors that it desires and relieves it of any duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting, us, our affiliates or our limited partners. Examples of decisions that our general partner may make in its individual capacity include the following:
• | how to allocate corporate opportunities among us and its affiliates; |
• | how to exercise voting rights with respect to the units it owns; |
• | whether to exercise its registration rights; and |
• | whether to consent to any merger or consolidation of the Partnership or amendment to the partnership agreement. |
By purchasing a common unit, a common unitholder agrees to become bound by the provisions in the partnership agreement, including the above-described provisions.
Our partnership agreement restricts the remedies available to holders of our common units for actions taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that restrict the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duty under state fiduciary duty law. For example, our partnership agreement:
• | provides that whenever our general partner makes a determination or takes, or declines to take, any other action in its capacity as our general partner, our general partner is required to make such determination, or take or decline to take such other action, in good faith, and will not be subject to any other or different standard imposed by our partnership agreement, Delaware law, or any other law, rule or regulation, or at equity; |
• | provides that our general partner will not have any liability to us or our unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as a general partner so long as such decisions are made in good faith, meaning that it believed that the decision was in the best interest of the Partnership; |
• | provides that our general partner and its officers and directors will not be liable for monetary damages to us, our limited partners or their assignees resulting from any act or omission unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction determining that our general partner or its officers and directors, as the case may be, acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted with knowledge that the conduct was criminal; and |
• | provides that our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations under the partnership agreement or its duties to us or our unitholders if a transaction with an affiliate or the resolution of a conflict of interest is any of the following: |
(a) | approved by the Special Committee of the Board of Directors, although our general partner is not obligated to seek such approval; |
(b) | approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding any common units owned by our general partner and its affiliates; |
(c) | on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or |
(d) | fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the totality of the relationships among the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to us. |
67
In situations involving an affiliate transaction or a conflict of interest, any determination by our general partner must be made in good faith. If an affiliate transaction or the resolution of a conflict of interest is not approved by our common unitholders or the Special Committee and the Board of Directors determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the affiliate transaction or conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in subclauses (c) and (d) above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the Board of Directors acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or the Partnership, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such good-faith presumption.
The general partner interest in us may be transferred to a third party without unitholder consent.
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially all of its assets without the consent of our unitholders. Furthermore, Occidental, the owner of our general partner, may transfer its ownership interest in our general partner to a third party, also without unitholder consent. Our new general partner or the new owner of our general partner would then be in a position to replace the Board of Directors and officers of our general partner and to control the decisions taken by the Board of Directors and officers.
We may issue additional units without unitholder approval, which would dilute existing ownership interests.
Our partnership agreement does not limit the number of additional limited partner interests that we may issue at any time without the approval of our unitholders. The issuance by us of additional common units or other equity securities of equal or senior rank will have the following effects:
• | our existing unitholders’ proportionate ownership interest in us will decrease; |
• | the amount of per-unit cash available for distribution may decrease; |
• | the ratio of taxable income to distributions may increase; |
• | the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit may be diminished; and |
• | the market price of the common units may decline. |
The market price of our common units could be affected adversely by sales of substantial amounts of our common units in the public or private markets, including sales by Occidental or other large holders.
We had 443,971,409 common units outstanding as of December 31, 2019. Occidental currently holds 242,136,976 common units, representing 54.5% of our outstanding common units. Occidental’s shelf registration statement allows for the offer and sale of up to 50 million common units, or 11.3% of our common units as of December 31, 2019, from time to time. Sales by Occidental or other large holders of a substantial number of our common units in the public markets, or the perception that such sales might occur, could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common units or could impair our ability to obtain capital through an offering of equity securities. In addition, under our partnership agreement, our general partner and its affiliates, including Occidental, have registration rights relating to the offer and sale of any units that they hold, subject to certain limitations.
68
Unitholders’ liability may not be limited if a court finds that unitholder action constitutes control of our business.
A general partner of a partnership generally has unlimited liability for the obligations of the partnership, except for those contractual obligations of the partnership that are expressly made without recourse to the general partner. Our partnership is organized under Delaware law, and we conduct business in a number of other states. The limitations on the liability of holders of limited partner interests for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in some of the other states in which we do business. A unitholder could be liable for any and all of our obligations as if that unitholder were a general partner if a court or government agency were to determine that:
• | we were conducting business in a state but had not complied with that particular state’s partnership statute; or |
• | such unitholder’s right to act with other unitholders to remove or replace our general partner, to approve some amendments to our partnership agreement, or to take other actions under our partnership agreement constitute “control” of our business. |
Unitholders may have liability to repay distributions that were wrongfully distributed to them.
Under certain circumstances, unitholders may have to repay amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, we may not make a distribution to unitholders if the distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair value of our assets. Delaware law provides that for a period of three years from the date of an impermissible distribution, limited partners who received the distribution and who knew at the time of the distribution that it violated Delaware law will be liable to the limited partnership for the impermissible distribution amount. Substituted limited partners are liable for the obligations of the assignor to make contributions to the partnership that were known to the substituted limited partner at the time it became a limited partner and for those obligations that were unknown if the liabilities could have been determined from the partnership agreement. Neither liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interest nor liabilities that are non-recourse to the partnership are counted for purposes of determining whether a distribution is permitted.
If we are deemed to be an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, it would affect the price of our common units adversely and could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our assets include, among other items, a $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko. If this note receivable, together with a sufficient amount of our other assets are deemed to be “investment securities,” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”), we either would have to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, obtain exemptive relief from the SEC, or modify our organizational structure or contract rights so as to fall outside of the definition of an investment company. Registering as an investment company could, among other things, materially limit our ability to engage in transactions with affiliates, including the purchase and sale of certain securities or other property from or to our affiliates, restrict our ability to borrow funds or engage in other transactions involving leverage, and require us to add additional directors who are independent of us or our affiliates. The occurrence of some or all of these events would affect the price of our common units adversely and could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Moreover, treatment of us as an investment company would prevent our qualification as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, in which case we would be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. As a result, we would pay federal and possibly state income taxes on our taxable income at applicable corporate tax rates; distributions received by our unitholders generally would be taxed as corporate distributions; and none of our income, gains, losses, or deductions would flow through to our unitholders. If we were taxed as a corporation, our cash available for distribution to our unitholders would be reduced substantially. Therefore, treatment of us as an investment company would result in a material reduction in the anticipated cash flows and after-tax return to the unitholders, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our common units.
69
The market price of our common units could be volatile due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control.
The market price of our common units could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, most of which we cannot control, including the following:
• | changes in investor or analyst estimates of Occidental’s and our financial performance or our future distribution growth; |
• | the public’s reaction to Occidental’s or our press releases, announcements, and filings with the SEC; |
• | legislative or regulatory changes affecting our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes; |
• | fluctuations in broader securities market prices and volumes, particularly among securities of midstream companies and securities of publicly traded limited partnerships; |
• | changes in market valuations of similar companies; |
• | departures of key personnel; |
• | commencement of or involvement in litigation; |
• | variations in our quarterly results of operations or those of other midstream companies; |
• | variations in the amount of our quarterly cash distributions; |
• | future issuances and sales of our common units; and |
• | changes in general conditions in the U.S. economy, financial markets, or the midstream industry. |
In recent years, the capital markets have experienced extreme volatility that has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. Future market fluctuations may result in a lower price of our common units.
70
TAX RISKS TO COMMON UNITHOLDERS
Our taxation as a flow-through entity depends on our status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and our not being subject to a material amount of entity-level taxation by individual states. If the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) were to treat us as a corporation for federal income tax purposes or if we were to become subject to material additional amounts of entity-level taxation for state tax purposes, then our cash available for distribution to our unitholders could be reduced substantially.
The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in our common units depends largely on our being treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Notwithstanding our status as a limited partnership under Delaware law, it is possible in certain circumstances for a partnership such as us to be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes unless it satisfies a “qualifying income” requirement and is not treated as an investment company. Based on our current operations, we believe that we satisfy the qualifying income requirement and are not treated as an investment company. Failing to meet the qualifying income requirement, being treated as an investment company, a change in our business activities, or a change in current law could cause us to be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes or otherwise subject us to entity-level taxation.
If we were treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our taxable income at the applicable corporate tax rate and likely would pay state income tax at varying rates. Distributions to our unitholders generally would be taxed as corporate distributions, and no income, gains, losses, deductions, or credits would flow through to our unitholders. If we are subject to corporate taxation, our cash available for distribution to our unitholders would be reduced substantially. Likewise, our treatment as a corporation would result in a material reduction in the anticipated cash flows and after-tax return to our unitholders, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our common units.
At the state level, several states have been evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity-level taxation through the imposition of state income or franchise taxes, or other forms of taxation. For example, we are required to pay Texas margin tax on our gross income apportioned to Texas. Imposition of similar taxes on us in other jurisdictions in which we operate, or to which we may expand our operations, could reduce the cash available for distribution to our unitholders substantially.
The tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships or an investment in our common units could be subject to potential legislative, judicial, or administrative changes and differing interpretations, possibly on a retroactive basis.
The current U.S. federal income tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships, including us, or an investment in our common units may be modified by administrative, legislative, or judicial interpretation at any time. From time to time, members of Congress have proposed and considered substantive changes to the existing U.S. federal income tax laws that would affect publicly traded partnerships, including elimination of partnership tax treatment for publicly traded partnerships. For example, the “Clean Energy for America Act,” which is similar to legislation that was commonly proposed during the Obama Administration, was introduced in the Senate on May 2, 2019. If enacted, this proposal would, among other things, repeal Section 7704(d)(1)(E) of the Code, which we rely on for our status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In addition, the Treasury Department has issued, and in the future may issue, regulations interpreting those laws that affect publicly traded partnerships. There can be no assurance that there will not be further changes to U.S. federal income tax laws or the Treasury Department’s interpretation of the qualifying income rules in a manner that could impact our ability to qualify as a partnership in the future. We believe the income that we treat as qualifying income satisfies the requirements under current regulations.
We are unable to predict whether any changes or proposals ultimately will be enacted. Any modification to the U.S. federal income tax laws and interpretations thereof may or may not be retroactively applied and could make it more difficult or impossible for us to satisfy the requirements to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and could impact the value of an investment in our common units negatively.
You are urged to consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the status of regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on your investment in our common units.
71
If the IRS were to contest the federal income tax positions we take, it may impact the market for our common units adversely, and the costs of any such contest would reduce the cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
We have not requested a ruling from the IRS with respect to the pricing of our related-party agreements with Occidental or our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The IRS may adopt positions that differ from the positions we take. It may be necessary to resort to administrative or court proceedings to sustain some or all of the positions we take, and a court may not agree with some or all of those positions. Any contest with the IRS may materially and adversely impact the market for our common units and the price at which they trade. Moreover, the costs of any contest with the IRS will result in a reduction in cash available for distribution to our unitholders and thus will be borne indirectly by our unitholders.
If the IRS makes audit adjustments to our income tax returns for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, it (and some states) may assess and collect any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustments directly from us, in which case our cash available for distribution to our unitholders might be reduced substantially. In addition, our current and former unitholders may be required to indemnify us for any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustments that were paid on such unitholders’ behalf.
Pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, if the IRS makes audit adjustments to our income tax returns, it (and some states) may assess and collect any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustments directly from us. To the extent possible under the new rules, our general partner may elect to either pay the taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) directly to the IRS or, if we are eligible, issue a revised information statement to each unitholder and former unitholder with respect to an audited and adjusted return. Although our general partner may elect to have our unitholders and former unitholders take such audit adjustment into account and pay any resulting taxes (including applicable penalties or interest) in accordance with their respective interests in us during the tax year under audit, there can be no assurance that such election will be practical, permissible, or effective in all circumstances. As a result, our current unitholders may bear some or all of the tax liability resulting from such audit adjustment, even if such unitholders did not own units in us during the tax year for which an adverse audit finding relates. If, as a result of any such audit adjustment, we are required to make payments of taxes, penalties, and interest, our cash available for distribution to our unitholders might be reduced substantially and our current and former unitholders may be required to indemnify us for any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustments that were paid on such unitholders’ behalf. These rules are not applicable for tax years beginning on or prior to December 31, 2017.
Our unitholders are required to pay taxes on their share of our income even if they do not receive any cash distributions from us.
Our unitholders are required to pay any U.S. federal income taxes and, in some cases, state and local income taxes on their share of our taxable income irrespective of whether they receive cash distributions from us. For example, if we sell assets and use the proceeds to repay existing debt or fund capital expenditures, unitholders may be allocated taxable income and gain resulting from the sale, and our cash available for distribution would not increase. Similarly, taking advantage of opportunities to reduce our existing debt, including debt exchanges, debt repurchases, or modifications of our existing debt could result in “cancellation of indebtedness income” being allocated to our unitholders as taxable income without any increase in our cash available for distribution. Our unitholders may not receive cash distributions from us equal to their share of our taxable income or even equal to the actual tax liability attributable to their share of our taxable income.
72
Tax gain or loss on the disposition of our common units could be more or less than expected.
If a unitholder sells common units, the unitholder will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized and that unitholder’s tax basis in those common units. Because distributions in excess of a unitholder’s allocable share of our net taxable income result in a decrease in that unitholder’s tax basis in its common units, the amount, if any, of such prior excess distributions with respect to the units sold will, in effect, become taxable income to that unitholder, if that unitholder sells such units at a price greater than that unitholder’s tax basis in those units, even if the price received is less than their original cost. In addition, because the amount realized includes a unitholder’s share of our nonrecourse liabilities, if they sell their units, unitholders may incur a tax liability in excess of the amount of cash they receive from the sale.
Irrespective of whether a unitholder’s disposition of common units results in a gain, a substantial portion of the amount realized from a unitholder’s sale of units may be taxed as ordinary income to the unitholder due to potential recapture of items, including depreciation recapture. Thus, a unitholder may recognize ordinary income and capital loss from the sale of units if the amount realized on the sale is less than the unitholder’s adjusted basis in the units. Net capital loss may offset only capital gains and, in the case of individuals, up to $3,000 of ordinary income per year. In the taxable period in which a unitholder sells units, the unitholder may recognize ordinary income from our allocations of income and gain prior to the sale and from recapture items, which generally cannot be offset by any capital loss recognized on the sale of units.
Tax-exempt entities face unique tax issues from owning common units that may result in adverse tax consequences to them.
Investment in our common units by tax-exempt entities, such as employee benefit plans and individual retirement accounts (or “IRAs”) raises unique issues. For example, virtually all of our income allocated to organizations that are exempt from federal income tax, including IRAs and other retirement plans, will be taxable as unrelated business taxable income. Further, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, subject to the Treasury Department’s proposed aggregation rules regarding certain similarly situated businesses or activities, a tax-exempt entity with more than one unrelated trade or business (including by attribution from investment in a partnership such as ours that is engaged in one or more unrelated trades or businesses) is required to compute the unrelated business taxable income of such tax-exempt entity separately with respect to each such trade or business (including for purposes of determining any net operating loss deduction). As a result, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, it may not be possible for tax-exempt entities to utilize losses from an investment in us to offset unrelated business taxable income from another unrelated trade or business, and vice versa. Tax-exempt entities should consult a tax advisor before investing in our common units.
Non-U.S. unitholders will be subject to U.S. taxes and withholding on income and gain from owning our units.
Non-U.S. unitholders generally are taxed and subject to income tax filing requirements by the United States on income effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business (“effectively connected income”). Income allocated to our unitholders and any gain from the sale of our units generally will be considered “effectively connected” with a U.S. trade or business. As a result, distributions to a non-U.S. unitholder are subject to withholding at the highest applicable effective tax rate and a non-U.S. unitholder who sells or otherwise disposes of a unit also is subject to U.S. federal income tax on the gain realized from the sale or disposition of that unit.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act imposes a withholding obligation of 10% of the amount realized on a non-U.S. unitholder’s sale or exchange of an interest in a partnership that is engaged in a U.S. trade or business. However, due to challenges of administering a withholding obligation applicable to open-market trading and other complications, the IRS temporarily has suspended the application of this withholding obligation to open-market transfers of interests in publicly traded partnerships, pending promulgation of final regulations. It is not clear when such final regulations will be issued. Non-U.S. unitholders should consult a tax advisor before investing in our common units.
73
We treat each purchaser of our common units as having the same tax benefits without regard to the common units actually purchased. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could affect the value of our common units adversely.
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common units, we have adopted certain methods of allocating depreciation and amortization deductions that may not conform with all aspects of existing Treasury Regulations. A successful IRS challenge to the use of these methods could diminish the amount of tax benefits available to our unitholders, affect the timing for recognition of these tax benefits or the amount of gain from any sale of common units, impact the value of our common units negatively, or result in audit adjustments to unitholders’ tax returns.
We generally prorate our items of income, gain, loss, and deduction between transferors and transferees of our common units each month based on the ownership of our common units on the first day of each month, instead of on the basis of the date a particular common unit is transferred. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could change the allocation of items of income, gain, loss, and deduction among our unitholders.
We generally prorate our items of income, gain, loss, and deduction between transferors and transferees of our common units each month based on the ownership of our common units on the first day of each month (the “Allocation Date”), instead of on the basis of the date a particular common unit is transferred. Similarly, we generally allocate certain deductions for depreciation of capital additions, gain or loss realized on a sale or other disposition of our assets, and, in the discretion of the general partner, any other extraordinary item of income, gain, loss, or deduction based upon ownership on the Allocation Date. Treasury Regulations allow a similar monthly simplifying convention, but such regulations do not specifically authorize all aspects of our proration method. If the IRS were to challenge our proration method, we may be required to change the allocation of items of income, gain, loss, and deduction among our unitholders.
A unitholder whose common units are the subject of a securities loan (e.g., a loan to a “short seller” to cover a short sale of common units) may be considered to have disposed of those common units. If so, the unitholder would no longer be treated as a partner for tax purposes with respect to those common units during the period of the loan and may recognize gain or loss from the disposition.
Because there are no specific rules governing the federal income tax consequences of loaning a partnership interest, a unitholder whose common units are the subject of a securities loan may be considered to have disposed of the loaned units. In that case, the unitholder may no longer be treated as a partner for tax purposes with respect to those common units during the period of the loan, and the unitholder may recognize gain or loss from such deemed disposition. Moreover, during the period of the loan, any of our income, gain, loss, or deduction with respect to those common units may not be reportable by the unitholder and any cash distributions received by the unitholder as to those common units could be fully taxable as ordinary income. Unitholders desiring to assure their status as partners and avoid the risk of gain recognition from a securities loan are urged to consult a tax advisor to determine whether it is advisable to modify any applicable brokerage account agreements to prohibit their brokers from lending their common units.
We have adopted certain valuation methodologies in determining a unitholder’s allocations of income, gain, loss, and deduction. The IRS may challenge these methodologies or the resulting allocations, which could affect the value of our common units adversely.
In determining items of income, gain, loss, and deduction allocable to our unitholders, we must routinely determine the fair market value of our assets. Although we may, from time to time, consult with professional appraisers regarding valuation matters, we make many fair market value estimates using a methodology based on the market value of our common units as a means to measure the fair market value of our assets. The IRS may challenge these valuation methods and the resulting allocations of income, gain, loss, and deduction.
A successful IRS challenge to these methods or allocations could diminish the amount of tax benefits available to our unitholders, affect the timing for recognition of these tax benefits or the amount of gain from any sale of common units, impact the value of our common units negatively, or result in audit adjustments to unitholders’ tax returns.
74
Our unitholders are subject to state and local taxes and return-filing requirements in jurisdictions where they do not live as a result of investing in our common units.
In addition to U.S. federal income taxes, our unitholders are subject to other taxes, including foreign, state, and local taxes; unincorporated business taxes; and estate, inheritance, or intangible taxes that are imposed by the various jurisdictions in which we conduct business or own property now or in the future, even if they do not live in any of those jurisdictions. Our unitholders likely will be required to file foreign, state, and local income tax returns and pay state and local income taxes in some or all of these various jurisdictions. Further, our unitholders may be subject to penalties for failure to comply with those requirements. As we make acquisitions or expand our business, we may own assets or conduct business in additional states or foreign jurisdictions that impose a personal income tax. It is the responsibility of each unitholder to file all U.S. federal, foreign, state, and local tax returns.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of WES, is currently in negotiations with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) and the State of Colorado with respect to alleged non-compliance with the leak detection and repair requirements of the federal Clean Air Act (“LDAR requirements”) at its Fort Lupton facility in the DJ Basin complex and WGR Operating, LP, another wholly owned subsidiary of WES, is in negotiations with the EPA and the State of Wyoming with respect to alleged non-compliance with LDAR requirements at its Granger, Wyoming facility. Although management cannot predict the outcome of settlement discussions in these matters, management believes that it is reasonably likely a resolution of these matters will result in a fine or penalty for each matter in excess of $100,000.
Except as discussed above, we are not a party to any legal, regulatory, or administrative proceedings other than proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that there are no such proceedings for which a final disposition could have a material adverse effect on results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition, or for which disclosure is otherwise required by Item 103 of Regulation S-K.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
75
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
MARKET INFORMATION
Our common units are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “WES.” As of February 24, 2020, there were 23 unitholders of record of our common units. This number does not include unitholders whose units are held in trust by other entities. The actual number of unitholders is greater than the number of holders of record. We also have 9,060,641 general partner units issued and outstanding; there is no established public trading market for any such general partner units. All general partner units are held by our general partner.
OTHER SECURITIES MATTERS
Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds. Under the Exchange Agreement, WES issued 9,060,641 general partner units to the general partner. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. Our general partner has the authority to grant equity compensation awards under the Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (assumed by us in connection with the Merger) and the Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (collectively referred to as the “LTIPs”) to our independent directors, executive officers, and Occidental employees performing services for us from time to time. The Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan permits the issuance of up to 3,431,251 units, of which 3,419,020 units remained available for future issuance as of December 31, 2019. The Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan permits the issuance of up to 3,000,000 units, of which 2,911,985 units remained available for future issuance as of December 31, 2019. Phantom unit grants under the LTIPs have been made to each of the independent directors of our general partner. Read the information under Part III, Item 12 of this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into this Item 5.
SELECTED INFORMATION FROM OUR PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
Set forth below is a summary of the significant provisions of our partnership agreement that relate to cash distributions.
Available cash. Our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of our available cash (as defined in our partnership agreement) to unitholders of record on the applicable record date within 55 days following each quarter’s end. The amount of available cash (as defined in the partnership agreement) generally is all cash on hand at the end of the quarter, plus, at the discretion of the general partner, working capital borrowings made subsequent to the end of such quarter, less the amount of cash reserves established by the general partner to provide for the proper conduct of our business, including reserves to fund future capital expenditures; to comply with applicable laws, debt instruments, or other agreements; or to provide funds for unitholder distributions for any one or more of the next four quarters. Working capital borrowings generally include borrowings made under a credit facility or similar financing arrangement and are intended to be repaid or refinanced within 12 months. In all cases, working capital borrowings are used solely for working capital purposes or to fund unitholder distributions.
General partner interest. Our general partner owns a 2.0% general partner interest in us, which entitles it to receive cash distributions. Our general partner may own our common units or other equity securities and would be entitled to receive cash distributions on any such interests.
76
Item 6. Selected Financial and Operating Data
The following Summary Financial Information tables show the selected financial and operating data of WES and WES Operating, which are derived from the respective consolidated financial statements for the periods and as of the dates indicated. Our consolidated financial statements include the consolidated financial results of WES Operating.
The Partnership’s assets include assets owned and ownership interests accounted for by us under the equity method of accounting, through our 98% partnership interest in WES Operating, as of December 31, 2019 (see Note 10—Equity Investments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). We also own and control the entire non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating GP, and our general partner is owned by Occidental; therefore, prior asset acquisitions from Anadarko were classified as transfers of net assets between entities under common control. As such, assets acquired from Anadarko initially were recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value, which did not equate to the total acquisition price paid by us. Further, subsequent to asset acquisitions from Anadarko, we were required to recast our financial statements to include the activities of acquired assets from the date of common control.
For reporting periods that required recast, the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the acquisition of assets from Anadarko were prepared from Anadarko’s historical cost-basis accounts and may not be necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if we had owned the assets during the periods reported. For ease of reference, we refer to the historical financial results of the Partnership’s assets prior to the acquisitions from Anadarko as being “our” historical financial results.
Occidental Merger. On August 8, 2019, Anadarko, the indirect general partner and majority unitholder of WES, was acquired by Occidental pursuant to the Occidental Merger.
Acquisitions. The following table presents the acquisitions completed by us for the periods presented in the Summary Financial Information table below. Our consolidated financial statements include the combined financial results and operations for: (i) affiliate acquisitions for all periods presented and (ii) third-party acquisitions since the acquisition date.
Acquisition Date | Percentage Acquired | Affiliate or Third-party Acquisition | |||||
DBJV system | 03/02/2015 | 50 | % | Affiliate | |||
Springfield system | 03/14/2016 | 50.1 | % | Affiliate | |||
DBJV system (1) | 03/17/2017 | 50 | % | Third party | |||
Whitethorn LLC (2) | 06/01/2018 | 20 | % | Third party | |||
Cactus II (2) | 06/27/2018 | 15 | % | Third party | |||
Red Bluff Express (2) | 01/18/2019 | 30 | % | Third party |
(1) | See Property exchange below. |
(2) | See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional details. |
Acquisition of AMA. In February 2019, WES Operating acquired AMA from Anadarko. See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
Property exchange. In March 2017, we acquired the Additional DBJV System Interest from a third party in exchange for the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and $155.0 million of cash consideration. We previously held a 50% interest in, and operated, the DBJV system.
Divestitures. In December 2018, the Newcastle system in Northeast Wyoming was sold to a third party. In June 2017, the Helper and Clawson systems, located in Utah, were sold to a third party. In October 2016, the Hugoton system, located in Southwest Kansas and Oklahoma, was sold to a third party. In July 2015, the Dew and Pinnacle systems in East Texas were sold to a third party.
77
The information in the following tables should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which are included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, and with the information under the captions Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results, How We Evaluate Our Operations, and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
The following table presents selected financial and operating data for WES:
Summary Financial Information | ||||||||||||||||||||
thousands except per-unit data, throughput, per-Mcf Adjusted gross margin, and per-Bbl Adjusted gross margin | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data (for the year ended): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues and other | $ | 2,746,174 | $ | 2,299,658 | $ | 2,429,614 | $ | 1,941,330 | $ | 1,853,233 | ||||||||||
Cost of product | 444,247 | 415,505 | 953,792 | 517,371 | 551,287 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 1,231,343 | 861,282 | 801,698 | 783,082 | 202,105 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 807,700 | 630,654 | 737,385 | 658,286 | 48,980 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 110,459 | 79,083 | 196,595 | 251,208 | (154,409 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Midstream Partners, LP | 697,241 | 551,571 | 540,790 | 407,078 | 203,389 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per common unit – basic and diluted | 1.59 | 1.69 | 1.72 | 1.53 | 0.39 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions per unit | 2.47000 | 2.34875 | 2.10500 | 1.76750 | 1.49125 | |||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data (at year end): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 12,346,453 | $ | 11,457,205 | $ | 9,430,090 | $ | 8,709,610 | $ | 8,196,163 | ||||||||||
Total long-term liabilities | 8,515,206 | 5,927,045 | 3,887,074 | 3,503,934 | 3,285,264 | |||||||||||||||
Total equity and partners’ capital | 3,345,293 | 4,892,683 | 4,995,050 | 4,872,656 | 4,645,456 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Data (for the year ended): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 1,324,100 | $ | 1,348,175 | $ | 1,042,715 | $ | 1,056,149 | $ | 873,330 | ||||||||||
Investing activities | (3,387,853 | ) | (2,210,813 | ) | (1,133,324 | ) | (1,229,874 | ) | (740,816 | ) | ||||||||||
Financing activities | 2,071,573 | 875,192 | (188,875 | ) | 433,103 | (100,033 | ) | |||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (1,188,829 | ) | (1,948,595 | ) | (1,026,932 | ) | (547,986 | ) | (786,945 | ) | ||||||||||
Throughput for natural-gas assets (MMcf/d): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total throughput | 4,423 | 4,068 | 3,840 | 4,219 | 4,442 | |||||||||||||||
Throughput attributable to noncontrolling interests (1) | 175 | 170 | 179 | 206 | 228 | |||||||||||||||
Total throughput attributable to WES for natural-gas assets | 4,248 | 3,898 | 3,661 | 4,013 | 4,214 | |||||||||||||||
Throughput for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets (MBbls/d) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total throughput | 1,219 | 775 | 406 | 371 | 295 | |||||||||||||||
Throughput attributable to noncontrolling interests (1) | 24 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
Total throughput attributable to WES for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets | 1,195 | 760 | 398 | 364 | 289 | |||||||||||||||
Key Performance Metrics (for the year ended): (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted gross margin for natural-gas assets | $ | 1,656,041 | $ | 1,443,466 | $ | 1,256,160 | $ | 1,225,245 | $ | 1,168,141 | ||||||||||
Adjusted gross margin for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets | 772,036 | 534,739 | 263,709 | 227,679 | 159,116 | |||||||||||||||
Per-Mcf Adjusted gross margin for natural-gas assets | 1.07 | 1.01 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.76 | |||||||||||||||
Per-Bbl Adjusted gross margin for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets | 1.77 | 1.93 | 1.82 | 1.71 | 1.51 | |||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 1,719,090 | 1,466,445 | 1,169,651 | 1,114,114 | 961,139 | |||||||||||||||
Distributable cash flow | 1,325,445 | 1,139,587 | 1,010,850 | 923,163 | 830,017 |
(1) | For all periods presented, includes (i) the 25% third-party interest in Chipeta and (ii) the 2.0% Occidental subsidiary-owned limited partner interest in WES Operating, which collectively represent WES’s noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2019. For a discussion of the impact to noncontrolling interests as a result of the Merger closing, see Noncontrolling interests within Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
(2) | Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, and Distributable cash flow are not defined in GAAP. For definitions and reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, see How We Evaluate Our Operations under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K. |
78
The following table presents selected financial data for WES Operating:
Summary Financial Information | ||||||||||||||||||||
thousands except per-unit data | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data (for the year ended): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues and other | $ | 2,746,174 | $ | 2,299,658 | $ | 2,429,614 | $ | 1,941,330 | $ | 1,853,233 | ||||||||||
Cost of product | 444,247 | 415,505 | 953,792 | 517,371 | 551,287 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 1,238,162 | 865,311 | 804,570 | 786,755 | 205,253 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 814,685 | 636,526 | 742,401 | 663,600 | 52,089 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest | 7,095 | 8,609 | 10,735 | 10,963 | 10,101 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Midstream Operating, LP | 807,590 | 627,917 | 731,666 | 652,637 | 41,988 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per common unit – basic and diluted | N/A | 0.55 | 1.30 | 1.74 | (1.95 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Distributions per unit | — | 3.830 | 3.590 | 3.350 | 3.050 | |||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data (at year end): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 12,342,825 | $ | 11,454,845 | $ | 9,428,129 | $ | 8,706,541 | $ | 8,194,016 | ||||||||||
Total long-term liabilities | 8,515,206 | 5,927,045 | 3,859,074 | 3,475,934 | 3,285,264 | |||||||||||||||
Total equity and partners’ capital | 3,341,819 | 4,919,597 | 5,021,182 | 4,897,669 | 4,643,386 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Data (for the year ended): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 1,332,189 | $ | 1,352,114 | $ | 1,046,798 | $ | 1,060,658 | $ | 876,166 | ||||||||||
Investing activities | (3,387,853 | ) | (2,210,813 | ) | (1,133,324 | ) | (1,229,874 | ) | (740,816 | ) | ||||||||||
Financing activities | 2,063,338 | 870,333 | (192,585 | ) | 429,108 | (104,371 | ) | |||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (1,188,829 | ) | (1,948,595 | ) | (1,026,932 | ) | (547,986 | ) | (786,945 | ) |
79
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion analyzes our financial condition and results of operations and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, wherein WES Operating is fully consolidated, which are included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, and the information set forth in Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K.
The Partnership’s assets include assets owned and ownership interests accounted for by us under the equity method of accounting, through our 98% partnership interest in WES Operating, as of December 31, 2019 (see Note 10—Equity Investments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). We also own and control the entire non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating GP, and our general partner is owned by Occidental; therefore, prior asset acquisitions from Anadarko were classified as transfers of net assets between entities under common control. As such, assets acquired from Anadarko initially were recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value, which did not equate to the total acquisition price paid by us. Further, subsequent to asset acquisitions from Anadarko, we were required to recast our financial statements to include the activities of acquired assets from the date of common control.
For reporting periods that required recast, the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the acquisition of assets from Anadarko were prepared from Anadarko’s historical cost-basis accounts and may not be necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if we had owned the assets during the periods reported. For ease of reference, we refer to the historical financial results of the Partnership’s assets prior to the acquisitions from Anadarko as being “our” historical financial results.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We currently own or have investments in assets located in the Rocky Mountains (Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming), North-central Pennsylvania, Texas, and New Mexico. We are engaged in the business of gathering, compressing, treating, processing, and transporting natural gas; gathering, stabilizing, and transporting condensate, NGLs, and crude oil; and gathering and disposing of produced water. In our capacity as a natural-gas processor, we also buy and sell natural gas, NGLs, and condensate on behalf of ourselves and as an agent for our customers under certain contracts. We provide the above-described midstream services for Occidental and third-party customers. As of December 31, 2019, our assets and investments consisted of the following:
Wholly Owned and Operated | Operated Interests | Non-Operated Interests | Equity Interests | |||||||||
Gathering systems (1) | 17 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||
Treating facilities | 37 | 3 | — | 3 | ||||||||
Natural-gas processing plants/trains | 25 | 3 | — | 5 | ||||||||
NGLs pipelines | 2 | — | — | 4 | ||||||||
Natural-gas pipelines | 5 | — | — | 1 | ||||||||
Crude-oil pipelines | 3 | 1 | — | 3 |
(1) | Includes the DBM water systems. |
80
December 2019 Agreements. On December 31, 2019, (i) WES and certain of its subsidiaries, including WES Operating and WES Operating GP, entered into the below-described agreements with Occidental and/or certain of its subsidiaries, including Anadarko, and (ii) WES Operating also entered into the below-described amendments to its debt agreements (collectively referred to as the “December 2019 Agreements”).
• | Exchange Agreement. WGRI, the general partner, and WES entered into a partnership interests exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), pursuant to which WES canceled the non-economic general partner interest in WES and simultaneously issued a 2.0% general partner interest to the general partner in exchange for which WGRI transferred 9,060,641 WES common units to WES, which immediately canceled such units on receipt. |
• | Services, Secondment, and Employee Transfer Agreement. Occidental, Anadarko, and WES Operating GP entered into the Services Agreement, pursuant to which Occidental, Anadarko, and their subsidiaries will (i) second certain personnel employed by Occidental to WES Operating GP, in exchange for which WES Operating GP will pay a monthly secondment and shared services fee to Occidental equivalent to the direct cost of the seconded employees and (ii) continue to provide certain administrative and operational services to WES for up to a two-year transition period. The Services Agreement also includes provisions governing the transfer of certain employees to WES and WES’s assumption of liabilities relating to those employees at the time of their transfer. In January 2020, pursuant to the Services Agreement, Occidental made a one-time cash contribution of $20.0 million to WES for anticipated transition costs required to establish stand-alone human resources and information technology functions. |
• | RCF amendment. WES Operating entered into an amendment to its RCF to, among other things, (i) effective on February 14, 2020, exercise the final one-year extension option to extend the maturity date of the RCF to February 14, 2025, for the extending lenders, and (ii) modify the change of control definition to provide, among other things, that, subject to certain conditions, if the limited partners of WES elect to remove the general partner as the general partner of WES in accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement, then such removal will not constitute a change of control under the RCF. |
• | Term loan facility amendment. WES Operating entered into an amendment of its Term loan facility to, among other things, modify the change of control definition to provide, among other things, that, subject to certain conditions, if the limited partners of WES elect to remove the general partner as the general partner of WES in accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement, then such removal will not constitute a change of control under the Term loan facility. |
• | Termination of debt-indemnification agreements. WES Operating GP and certain wholly owned subsidiaries of Occidental mutually terminated the debt-indemnification agreements related to indebtedness incurred by WES Operating. |
• | Termination of omnibus agreements. WES and WES Operating entered into agreements with Occidental to terminate the WES and WES Operating omnibus agreements. See Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information on the WES and WES Operating omnibus agreements. |
Occidental Merger. On August 8, 2019, Anadarko, the indirect general partner and majority unitholder of WES, was acquired by Occidental pursuant to the Occidental Merger.
81
Merger transactions. On February 28, 2019, WES, WES Operating, Anadarko, and certain of their affiliates completed the transactions contemplated by the Contribution Agreement and Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) dated November 7, 2018, pursuant to which, among other things, Clarity Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of WES, merged with and into WES Operating, with WES Operating continuing as the surviving entity and as a subsidiary of WES (the “Merger”). In connection with the Merger closing, (i) the common units of WES Operating, which previously traded under the symbol “WES,” ceased to trade on the NYSE, (ii) the common units of WES, which previously traded under the symbol “WGP,” began to trade on the NYSE under the symbol “WES,” (iii) WES changed its name from Western Gas Equity Partners, LP to Western Midstream Partners, LP, and (iv) WES Operating changed its name from Western Gas Partners, LP to Western Midstream Operating, LP.
The Merger Agreement also provided that WES, WES Operating, and Anadarko cause their respective affiliates to execute the following transactions, among others, immediately prior to the Merger becoming effective in the following order: (1) Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC and WGRAH (the “Contributing Parties”) contribute to WES Operating, and WES Operating subsequently contributes to WGR Operating, LP, Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC, and DBM (each wholly owned by WES Operating), all of their interests in each of Anadarko Wattenberg Oil Complex LLC, Anadarko DJ Oil Pipeline LLC, Anadarko DJ Gas Processing LLC, Wamsutter Pipeline LLC, DBM Oil Services, LLC, Anadarko Pecos Midstream LLC, Anadarko Mi Vida LLC, and APC Water Holdings 1, LLC (“APCWH”) in exchange for aggregate consideration of $1.814 billion of cash, less the outstanding amount payable pursuant to an intercompany note (the “APCWH Note Payable”) assumed by WES Operating in connection with the transfer, and 45,760,201 WES Operating common units; (2) AMH transfers its interests in Saddlehorn Pipeline Company, LLC, and Panola Pipeline Company, LLC to WES Operating in exchange for $193.9 million of cash; (3) WES Operating contributes cash in an amount equal to the outstanding balance of the APCWH Note Payable immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger to APCWH, which in turn uses the contributed cash to satisfy the APCWH Note Payable to Anadarko; (4) the WES Operating Class C units convert into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis; and (5) WES Operating and WES Operating GP convert the IDRs and the 2,583,068 general partner units in WES Operating held by WES Operating GP into a non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating and 105,624,704 WES Operating common units. The 45,760,201 WES Operating common units issued to the Contributing Parties, less 6,375,284 WES Operating common units retained by WGRAH, convert into the right to receive an aggregate of 55,360,984 common units of WES at Merger completion. Each WES Operating common unit issued and outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the Merger (other than WES Operating common units owned by WES and WES Operating GP, and certain common units held by subsidiaries of Anadarko) converts into the right to receive 1.525 common units of WES. See Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
Additional significant financial and operational events during the year ended December 31, 2019, included the following:
• | We increased our per-unit distribution to $0.62200 for the fourth quarter of 2019, representing a 0.3% increase over the third-quarter 2019 distribution and a 3% increase over the fourth-quarter 2018 distribution. |
• | In July 2019, WES Operating entered into an amendment to the Term loan facility to (i) extend the maturity date from February 2020 to December 2020, and (ii) increase commitments available under the Term loan facility from $2.0 billion to $3.0 billion, the incremental $1.0 billion of which was subsequently drawn by WES Operating on September 13, 2019, and used to repay outstanding borrowings under the RCF. In December 2019, WES Operating amended certain provisions of the Term loan facility. See Liquidity and Capital Resources within this Item 7 for additional information. |
• | In March 2019, WES Operating entered into additional interest-rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional principal amount of $375.0 million. In November and December 2019, WES Operating entered into additional interest-rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional principal amount of $1,125.0 million, effectively offsetting those entered into in December 2018 and March 2019. In December 2019, all outstanding interest-rate swap agreements were cash-settled. See Liquidity and Capital Resources within this Item 7 for additional information. |
• | In March 2019, the WGP RCF matured and the outstanding borrowings were repaid. See Liquidity and Capital Resources within this Item 7 for additional information. |
82
• | We commenced operations of Mentone Train II at the West Texas complex (with capacity of 200 MMcf/d) and Latham Train I at the DJ Basin complex (with capacity of 200 MMcf/d) at the end of the first and fourth quarters, respectively, of 2019. |
• | In February 2019, WES Operating increased the size of the RCF from $1.5 billion to $2.0 billion and extended the maturity date of the RCF to February 2024. In December 2019, WES Operating extended the maturity date of the RCF to February 2025 for the extending lenders and modified the change of control definition in the RCF. See Liquidity and Capital Resources within this Item 7 for additional information. |
• | In January 2019, we acquired a 30% interest in Red Bluff Express from a third party. See Acquisitions and Divestitures under Part I, Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K for additional information. |
• | Natural-gas throughput attributable to WES totaled 4,248 MMcf/d for the year ended December 31, 2019, representing a 9% increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. |
• | Crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water throughput attributable to WES totaled 1,195 MBbls/d for the year ended December 31, 2019, representing a 57% increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. |
• | Operating income (loss) was $1,231.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, representing a 43% increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. |
• | Adjusted gross margin for natural-gas assets (as defined under the caption How We Evaluate Our Operations within this Item 7) averaged $1.07 per Mcf for the year ended December 31, 2019, representing a 6% increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. |
• | Adjusted gross margin for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets (as defined under the caption How We Evaluate Our Operations within this Item 7) averaged $1.77 per Bbl for the year ended December 31, 2019, representing an 8% decrease compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. |
The following table provides additional information on throughput for the periods presented below:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | |||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas (MMcf/d) | Crude oil & NGLs (MBbls/d) | Produced water (MBbls/d) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delaware Basin | 1,226 | 1,041 | 18 | % | 150 | 132 | 14 | % | 556 | 239 | 133 | % | |||||||||||||||
DJ Basin | 1,236 | 1,133 | 9 | % | 118 | 105 | 12 | % | — | — | — | % | |||||||||||||||
Equity investments | 398 | 291 | 37 | % | 343 | 241 | 42 | % | — | — | — | % | |||||||||||||||
Other | 1,563 | 1,603 | (2 | )% | 52 | 58 | (10 | )% | — | — | — | % | |||||||||||||||
Total throughput | 4,423 | 4,068 | 9 | % | 663 | 536 | 24 | % | 556 | 239 | 133 | % |
83
ITEMS AFFECTING THE COMPARABILITY OF OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS
Our historical results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented may not be comparable to future or historic results of operations or cash flows for the reasons described below. Refer to Operating Results within this Item 7 for a discussion of our results of operations as compared to the prior periods.
Gathering and processing agreements. Certain of the gathering agreements for the West Texas complex, Springfield system, DJ Basin oil system, and Marcellus Interest systems allow for rate resets that target an agreed-upon rate of return over the life of the agreement. See Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Noncontrolling interests. For periods subsequent to Merger completion, our noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements consist of (i) the 25% third-party interest in Chipeta and (ii) the 2.0% Occidental subsidiary-owned limited partner interest in WES Operating. For periods prior to Merger completion, our noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements consisted of (i) the 25% third-party interest in Chipeta, (ii) the publicly held limited partner interests in WES Operating, (iii) the common units issued by WES Operating to subsidiaries of Anadarko as part of the consideration paid for prior acquisitions from Anadarko, (iv) the Class C units issued by WES Operating to a subsidiary of Anadarko as part of the funding for the acquisition of DBM, and (v) the WES Operating Series A Preferred units issued to private investors as part of the funding of the Springfield acquisition, until converted into WES Operating common units in 2017.
Commodity-price swap agreements. During all periods presented, the consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital included the impacts of commodity-price swap agreements. See Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding the commodity-price swap agreements with Anadarko that expired without renewal on December 31, 2018.
Income taxes. With respect to assets acquired from Anadarko, we recorded Anadarko’s historic current and deferred income taxes for the periods prior to our ownership of the assets. For periods subsequent to asset acquisitions from Anadarko, we are not subject to tax except for the Texas margin tax and, accordingly, do not record current and deferred federal income taxes related to such assets.
Acquisitions and divestitures. For the year ended December 31, 2019, there was a net increase in Adjusted gross margin of $4.1 million related to our third-party asset acquisition during 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2018, there was a net increase in Adjusted gross margin of $40.5 million related to our third-party asset acquisitions and divestitures during 2018. See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information and How We Evaluate Our Operations within this Item 7 for the definition of Adjusted gross margin.
Impairments. During 2018, we recognized impairments of $230.6 million, including impairments of (i) $125.9 million at the Third Creek gathering system and $8.1 million at the Kitty Draw gathering system due to the shutdown of the systems, (ii) $38.7 million at the Hilight system, and (iii) $34.6 million at the MIGC system. During 2017, we recognized impairments of $180.1 million, including an impairment of $158.8 million at the Granger complex due to a reduced throughput fee as a result of a producer’s bankruptcy. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 8—Property, Plant, and Equipment in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
84
DBM complex. In December 2015, there was an initial fire and secondary explosion at the processing facility within the DBM complex. The majority of the damage from the incident was to the liquid handling facilities and the amine-treating units at the inlet of the complex. During the year ended December 31, 2017, a $5.7 million loss was recorded in Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations, related to a change in the estimate of the amount that would be recovered under the property insurance claim based on further discussions with insurers. During the second quarter of 2017, we reached a settlement with insurers and final proceeds were received. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we received $52.9 million in cash proceeds from insurers, including $29.9 million in proceeds from business interruption insurance claims and $23.0 million in proceeds from property insurance claims. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Adoption of Topic 606. On January 1, 2018, we adopted Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“Topic 606”). The 2017 financial information was not adjusted and is reported under Revenue Recognition (Topic 605). See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information on our current revenue recognition policy.
OUR OPERATIONS
Our results primarily are driven by the volumes of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil, and produced water we service through our systems. In our operations, we contract with customers to provide midstream services focused on natural gas, NGLs, crude oil, and produced water. We gather natural gas from individual wells or production facilities located near our gathering systems and the natural gas may be compressed and delivered to a processing plant, treating facility, or downstream pipeline, and ultimately to end users. We treat and process a significant portion of the natural gas that we gather so that it will satisfy required specifications for pipeline transportation. We gather crude oil from individual wells or production facilities located near our gathering systems, and in some cases, treat or stabilize the crude oil to satisfy required specifications for pipeline transportation. We also gather and dispose of produced water.
Currently we have operations in Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, North-central Pennsylvania, Texas, and New Mexico, with a substantial portion of our business concentrated in the Rocky Mountains and West Texas. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2019, our DJ Basin and West Texas assets provided (i) 31% of each of our throughput for natural-gas assets (excluding equity-investment throughput), (ii) 13% and 81%, respectively, of our throughput for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets (excluding equity-investment throughput), and (iii) 36% and 44%, respectively, of Total revenues and other.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, 59% of Total revenues and other, 38% of our throughput for natural-gas assets (excluding equity-investment throughput), and 83% of our throughput for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets (excluding equity-investment throughput) were attributable to transactions with Occidental. In addition, Occidental supports our operations by providing dedications and/or minimum-volume commitments.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, 93% of our wellhead natural-gas volume (excluding equity investments) and 100% of our crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water throughput (excluding equity investments) were serviced under fee-based contracts under which fixed and variable fees are received based on the volume or thermal content of the natural gas and on the volume of NGLs, crude oil, and produced water we gather, process, treat, transport, or dispose. This type of contract provides us with a relatively stable revenue stream that is not subject to direct commodity-price risk, except to the extent that (i) we retain and sell drip condensate that is recovered during the gathering of natural gas from the wellhead or production facilities or (ii) actual recoveries differ from contractual recoveries under a limited number of processing agreements.
We also have indirect exposure to commodity-price risk in that the relatively volatile commodity-price environment has caused and may continue to cause current or potential customers to delay drilling or shut-in production in certain areas, which would reduce the volumes of hydrocarbons available to our systems. We also bear limited commodity-price risk through the settlement of imbalances. Read Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk under Part II of this Form 10-K.
As a result of previous acquisitions from Anadarko and third parties, our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows may vary significantly in future periods. See Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results within this Item 7.
85
HOW WE EVALUATE OUR OPERATIONS
Our management relies on certain financial and operational metrics to analyze our performance. These metrics are significant factors in assessing our operating results and profitability and include (i) throughput, (ii) operating and maintenance expenses, (iii) general and administrative expenses, (iv) Adjusted gross margin (as defined below), (v) Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below), and (vi) Distributable cash flow (as defined below).
Throughput. Throughput is a significant operating variable that we use to assess our ability to generate revenues. To maintain or increase throughput on our systems, we must connect to additional wells or production facilities. Our success in maintaining or increasing throughput is impacted by the successful drilling of new wells by producers that are dedicated to our systems, recompletions of existing wells connected to our systems, our ability to secure volumes from new wells drilled on non-dedicated acreage, and our ability to attract natural-gas, crude-oil, NGLs, or produced-water volumes currently serviced by our competitors.
Operating and maintenance expenses. We monitor operating and maintenance expenses to assess the impact of these costs on asset profitability and to evaluate the overall efficiency of our operations. Operating and maintenance expenses include, among other things, field labor, insurance, repair and maintenance, equipment rentals, contract services, utility costs, and services provided to us or on our behalf. For periods commencing on the date of and subsequent to the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, certain of these expenses are incurred under our services and secondment agreement with Occidental, which was amended and restated on December 31, 2019 (see Executive Summary–December 2019 Agreements within this Item 7).
General and administrative expenses. To assess the appropriateness of our general and administrative expenses and maximize our cash available for distribution, we monitor such expenses by way of comparison to prior periods and to the annual budget approved by our Board of Directors. Pursuant to the WES and WES Operating omnibus agreements, Occidental and our general partner performed centralized corporate functions for us. General and administrative expenses for periods prior to the acquisition of assets from Anadarko included costs allocated by Anadarko through a management services fee. For periods subsequent to the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, allocations and reimbursements of general and administrative expenses were determined by Occidental in its reasonable discretion, in accordance with our partnership and omnibus agreements. Amounts required to be reimbursed to Occidental under the omnibus agreements also included any expenses attributable to our status as a publicly traded partnership, which were paid by Occidental and may include the following:
• | expenses associated with annual and quarterly reporting; |
• | tax return and Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution expenses; |
• | expenses associated with listing on the NYSE; and |
• | independent auditor fees, legal expenses, investor relations expenses, director fees, and registrar and transfer agent fees. |
The WES and WES Operating omnibus agreements were terminated in connection with the execution of the December 2019 Agreements. Pursuant to the Services Agreement entered into as part of the December 2019 Agreements, Occidental (i) seconds certain personnel employed by Occidental to WES Operating GP, in exchange for which WES Operating GP pays a monthly secondment and shared services fee to Occidental equivalent to the direct cost of the seconded employees and (ii) continues to provide certain administrative and operational services to us for up to a two-year transition period. See further detail in Executive Summary–December 2019 Agreements within this Item 7 and Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
86
Non-GAAP financial measures
Adjusted gross margin. We define Adjusted gross margin attributable to Western Midstream Partners, LP (“Adjusted gross margin”) as total revenues and other (less reimbursements for electricity-related expenses recorded as revenue), less cost of product, plus distributions from equity investments, and excluding the noncontrolling interests owners’ proportionate share of revenues and cost of product. We believe Adjusted gross margin is an important performance measure of our operations’ profitability and performance as compared to other companies in the midstream industry. Cost of product expenses include (i) costs associated with the purchase of natural gas and NGLs pursuant to our percent-of-proceeds, percent-of-product, and keep-whole contracts, (ii) costs associated with the valuation of gas imbalances, and (iii) costs associated with our obligations under certain contracts to redeliver a volume of natural gas to shippers, which is thermally equivalent to condensate retained by us and sold to third parties.
To facilitate investor and industry analyst comparisons between us and our peers, we also disclose per-Mcf Adjusted gross margin for natural-gas assets and per-Bbl Adjusted gross margin for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets. See Key Performance Metrics within this Item 7.
Adjusted EBITDA. We define Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Western Midstream Partners, LP (“Adjusted EBITDA”) as net income (loss), plus distributions from equity investments, non-cash equity-based compensation expense, interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, impairments, and other expense (including lower of cost or market inventory adjustments recorded in cost of product), less gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net, income from equity investments, interest income, income tax benefit, other income, and the noncontrolling interests owners’ proportionate share of revenues and expenses. We believe the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA provides information useful to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations and that Adjusted EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator of a company’s ability to incur and service debt, fund capital expenditures, and make distributions. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure that management and external users of our consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, commercial banks, and rating agencies, use, among other measures, to assess the following:
• | our operating performance as compared to other publicly traded partnerships in the midstream industry, without regard to financing methods, capital structure, or historical cost basis; |
• | the ability of our assets to generate cash flow to make distributions; and |
• | the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditures and the returns on investment of various investment opportunities. |
Distributable cash flow. We define “Distributable cash flow” as Adjusted EBITDA, plus interest income and the net settlement amounts from the sale and/or purchase of natural gas, condensate, and NGLs under WES Operating’s commodity-price swap agreements to the extent such amounts are not recognized as Adjusted EBITDA, less Service revenues – fee based recognized in Adjusted EBITDA in excess of (less than) customer billings, net cash paid (or to be paid) for interest expense (including amortization of deferred debt issuance costs originally paid in cash and offset by non-cash capitalized interest), maintenance capital expenditures, WES Operating Series A Preferred unit distributions, income taxes, and Distributable cash flow attributable to noncontrolling interests to the extent such amounts are not excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. We compare Distributable cash flow to the cash distributions we expect to pay our unitholders. Using this measure, management determines the Coverage ratio of Distributable cash flow to planned cash distributions. We believe Distributable cash flow is useful to investors because this measurement is used by many companies, analysts, and others in the industry as a performance measurement tool to evaluate our operating and financial performance as compared to the performance of other publicly traded partnerships.
Distributable cash flow is a measure we use to assess our ability to make distributions to our unitholders; however, this measure should not be viewed as indicative of the actual amount of cash available for distributions or planned for distribution for a given period. Furthermore, to the extent Distributable cash flow includes realized amounts recorded as capital contributions from Anadarko attributable to activity under our commodity-price swap agreements, it is not a reflection of our ability to generate cash from operations.
87
Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures. Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, and Distributable cash flow are not defined in GAAP. The GAAP measure used by us that is most directly comparable to Adjusted gross margin is operating income (loss). Net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities are the GAAP measures used by us that are most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA. The GAAP measure used by us that is most directly comparable to Distributable cash flow is net income (loss). Our non-GAAP financial measures of Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, and Distributable cash flow should not be considered as alternatives to the GAAP measures of operating income (loss), net income (loss), net cash provided by operating activities, or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, and Distributable cash flow have important limitations as analytical tools because they exclude some, but not all, items that affect operating income (loss), net income (loss), and net cash provided by operating activities. Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, and Distributable cash flow should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Our definitions of Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, and Distributable cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies in our industry, thereby diminishing their utility as comparative measures.
Management compensates for the limitations of Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, and Distributable cash flow as analytical tools by reviewing the comparable GAAP measures, understanding the differences between Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, and Distributable cash flow compared to (as applicable) operating income (loss), net income (loss), and net cash provided by operating activities, and incorporating this knowledge into its decision-making processes. We believe that investors benefit from having access to the same financial measures that our management considers in evaluating our operating results.
88
The following tables present (a) a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of our operating income (loss) to the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted gross margin, (b) a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measures of our net income (loss) and our net cash provided by operating activities to the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA, and (c) a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of our net income (loss) to the non-GAAP financial measure of Distributable cash flow:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Reconciliation of Operating income (loss) to Adjusted gross margin | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | $ | 1,231,343 | $ | 861,282 | $ | 801,698 | ||||||
Add: | ||||||||||||
Distributions from equity investments | 264,828 | 216,977 | 148,752 | |||||||||
Operation and maintenance | 641,219 | 480,861 | 345,617 | |||||||||
General and administrative | 114,591 | 67,195 | 53,949 | |||||||||
Property and other taxes | 61,352 | 51,848 | 53,147 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 483,255 | 389,164 | 318,771 | |||||||||
Impairments | 6,279 | 230,584 | 180,051 | |||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net | (1,406 | ) | 1,312 | 132,388 | ||||||||
Proceeds from business interruption insurance claims | — | — | 29,882 | |||||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates | 237,518 | 195,469 | 115,141 | |||||||||
Reimbursed electricity-related charges recorded as revenues | 74,629 | 66,678 | 56,860 | |||||||||
Adjusted gross margin attributable to noncontrolling interests (1) | 64,049 | 56,247 | 47,845 | |||||||||
Adjusted gross margin | $ | 2,428,077 | $ | 1,978,205 | $ | 1,519,869 | ||||||
Adjusted gross margin for natural-gas assets | $ | 1,656,041 | $ | 1,443,466 | $ | 1,256,160 | ||||||
Adjusted gross margin for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets | 772,036 | 534,739 | 263,709 |
(1) | For all periods presented, includes (i) the 25% third-party interest in Chipeta and (ii) the 2.0% Occidental subsidiary-owned limited partner interest in WES Operating, which collectively represent WES’s noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2019. For a discussion of the impact to noncontrolling interests as a result of the Merger closing, see Noncontrolling interests within Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
89
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Reconciliation of Net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 807,700 | $ | 630,654 | $ | 737,385 | ||||||
Add: | ||||||||||||
Distributions from equity investments | 264,828 | 216,977 | 148,752 | |||||||||
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense | 14,392 | 7,310 | 5,194 | |||||||||
Interest expense | 303,286 | 183,831 | 142,520 | |||||||||
Income tax expense | 13,472 | 58,934 | 20,483 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 483,255 | 389,164 | 318,771 | |||||||||
Impairments | 6,279 | 230,584 | 180,051 | |||||||||
Other expense | 161,813 | 8,264 | 145 | |||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net | (1,406 | ) | 1,312 | 132,388 | ||||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates | 237,518 | 195,469 | 115,141 | |||||||||
Interest income – affiliates | 16,900 | 16,900 | 16,900 | |||||||||
Other income | 37,792 | 2,749 | 1,384 | |||||||||
Income tax benefit | — | — | 80,406 | |||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests (1) | 45,131 | 42,843 | 37,431 | |||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 1,719,090 | $ | 1,466,445 | $ | 1,169,651 | ||||||
Reconciliation of Net cash provided by operating activities to Adjusted EBITDA | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 1,324,100 | $ | 1,348,175 | $ | 1,042,715 | ||||||
Interest (income) expense, net | 286,386 | 166,931 | 125,620 | |||||||||
Uncontributed cash-based compensation awards | (1,102 | ) | 879 | 25 | ||||||||
Accretion and amortization of long-term obligations, net | (8,441 | ) | (5,943 | ) | (4,932 | ) | ||||||
Current income tax (benefit) expense | 5,863 | (80,114 | ) | (6,785 | ) | |||||||
Other (income) expense, net (2) | 106,136 | (3,209 | ) | (1,384 | ) | |||||||
Distributions from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings – affiliates | 30,256 | 29,585 | 31,659 | |||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 45,033 | 60,502 | 16,244 | |||||||||
Accounts and imbalance payables and accrued liabilities, net | 30,866 | (45,605 | ) | 937 | ||||||||
Other items, net | (54,876 | ) | 38,087 | 2,983 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests (1) | (45,131 | ) | (42,843 | ) | (37,431 | ) | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 1,719,090 | $ | 1,466,445 | $ | 1,169,651 | ||||||
Cash flow information | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 1,324,100 | $ | 1,348,175 | $ | 1,042,715 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (3,387,853 | ) | (2,210,813 | ) | (1,133,324 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 2,071,573 | 875,192 | (188,875 | ) |
(1) | For all periods presented, includes (i) the 25% third-party interest in Chipeta and (ii) the 2.0% Occidental subsidiary-owned limited partner interest in WES Operating, which collectively represent WES’s noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2019. For a discussion of the impact to noncontrolling interests as a result of the Merger closing, see Noncontrolling interests within Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
(2) | Excludes net non-cash losses on interest-rate swaps of $25.6 million and $8.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. See Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
90
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands except Coverage ratio | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Reconciliation of Net income (loss) to Distributable cash flow and calculation of the Coverage ratio | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 807,700 | $ | 630,654 | $ | 737,385 | ||||||
Add: | ||||||||||||
Distributions from equity investments | 264,828 | 216,977 | 148,752 | |||||||||
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense | 14,392 | 7,310 | 5,194 | |||||||||
Non-cash settled interest expense, net | 39 | — | 71 | |||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense | 13,472 | 58,934 | (59,923 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 483,255 | 389,164 | 318,771 | |||||||||
Impairments | 6,279 | 230,584 | 180,051 | |||||||||
Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (1) | 7,407 | 51,618 | 58,551 | |||||||||
Other expense | 161,813 | 8,264 | 145 | |||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||
Recognized Service revenues – fee based in excess of (less than) customer billings | (28,764 | ) | 62,498 | — | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net | (1,406 | ) | 1,312 | 132,388 | ||||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates | 237,518 | 195,469 | 115,141 | |||||||||
Cash paid for maintenance capital expenditures | 124,548 | 120,865 | 77,557 | |||||||||
Capitalized interest | 26,980 | 32,479 | 9,074 | |||||||||
Cash paid for (reimbursement of) income taxes | 96 | 2,408 | 1,194 | |||||||||
WES Operating Series A Preferred unit distributions | — | — | 7,453 | |||||||||
Other income | 37,792 | 2,749 | 1,384 | |||||||||
Distributable cash flow attributable to noncontrolling interests (2) | 36,976 | 36,138 | 33,956 | |||||||||
Distributable cash flow (3) | $ | 1,325,445 | $ | 1,139,587 | $ | 1,010,850 | ||||||
Distributions declared | ||||||||||||
Distributions from WES Operating | $ | 1,128,309 | ||||||||||
Less: Cash reserve for the proper conduct of WES’s business | 9,360 | |||||||||||
Distributions to WES unitholders (4) | $ | 1,118,949 | ||||||||||
Coverage ratio | 1.18 | x |
(1) | See Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
(2) | For all periods presented, includes (i) the 25% third-party interest in Chipeta and (ii) the 2.0% Occidental subsidiary-owned limited partner interest in WES Operating, which collectively represent WES’s noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2019. For a discussion of the impact to noncontrolling interests as a result of the Merger closing, see Noncontrolling interests within Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
(3) | For the year ended December 31, 2019, excludes cash payments of $107.7 million related to the settlement of interest-rate swap agreements. See Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
(4) | Reflects cash distributions of $2.47000 per unit declared for the year ended December 31, 2019, including the cash distribution of $0.62200 per unit paid on February 13, 2020, for the fourth-quarter 2019 distribution. |
91
GENERAL TRENDS AND OUTLOOK
We expect our business to continue to be affected by the following key trends and uncertainties. Our expectations are based on assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. To the extent our underlying assumptions about, or interpretations of, available information prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from expected results.
Impact of crude-oil, natural-gas, and NGLs prices. Crude-oil, natural-gas, and NGLs prices can fluctuate significantly, and have done so over time. Commodity-price fluctuations affect the overall level of our customers’ activity and how our customers allocate capital within their own asset portfolio. The relatively volatile commodity-price environment over the past decade has impacted drilling activity in several of the basins in which we operate. Many of our customers, including Occidental, have shifted capital spending toward opportunities with superior economics and reduced activity in other areas. To the extent possible, and to maintain throughput on our systems, we will continue to connect new wells or production facilities to our systems to mitigate the impact of natural production declines. However, our success in connecting additional wells or production facilities is dependent on the activity levels of our customers. Additionally, we will continue to evaluate the crude-oil, NGLs, and natural-gas price environments and adjust our capital spending plans to reflect our customers’ anticipated activity levels, while maintaining appropriate liquidity and financial flexibility.
Liquidity and access to capital markets. Under the terms of our partnership agreement, we are required to distribute all of our available cash to our unitholders, which makes us dependent on our ability to raise capital to fund growth projects and acquisitions. Historically, we have accessed the debt and equity capital markets to raise money for growth projects and acquisitions. From time to time, capital market turbulence and investor sentiment towards MLPs have raised our cost of capital and, in some cases, temporarily made certain sources of capital unavailable. If we are either unable to access the capital markets or find alternative sources of capital at reasonable costs, our growth strategy will become more challenging to execute.
Changes in regulations. Our operations and the operations of our customers have been, and will continue to be, affected by political developments and federal, state, tribal, local, and other laws and regulations that are becoming more numerous, more stringent, and more complex. These laws and regulations include, among other things, limitations on hydraulic fracturing and other oil and gas operations, pipeline safety and integrity requirements, permitting requirements, environmental protection measures such as limitations on methane and other GHG emissions, and restrictions on produced-water disposal wells. In addition, in certain areas in which we operate, public protests of oil and gas operations are becoming more frequent. The number and scope of the regulations with which we and our customers must comply has a meaningful impact on our and their businesses, and new or revised regulations, reinterpretations of existing regulations, and permitting delays or denials could adversely affect the throughput on and profitability of our assets.
Impact of inflation. Although inflation in the United States has been relatively low in recent years, the U.S. economy could experience significant inflation, which could increase our operating costs and capital expenditures materially and negatively impact our financial results. To the extent permitted by regulations and escalation provisions in certain of our existing agreements, we have the ability to recover a portion of increased costs in the form of higher fees.
Impact of interest rates. Overall, short- and long-term interest rates decreased during 2019 and remained low relative to historical averages. Short-term interest rates experienced a sharp decrease in response to the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) lowering its target range for the federal funds rate three separate times during 2019. Any future increases in the federal funds rate likely will result in an increase in short-term financing costs. Additionally, as with other yield-oriented securities, our unit price could be impacted by our implied distribution yield relative to market interest rates. Therefore, changes in interest rates, either positive or negative, may affect the yield requirements of investors who invest in our units, and a rising interest-rate environment could have an adverse impact on our unit price and our ability to issue additional equity, or increase the cost of issuing equity, to make acquisitions, reduce debt, or for other purposes. However, we expect our cost of capital to remain competitive, as our competitors face similar interest-rate dynamics.
Acquisition opportunities. We may pursue certain asset acquisitions where such acquisitions complement our existing asset base or allow us to capture operational efficiencies. However, if we do not make additional acquisitions on an economically accretive basis, our future growth could be limited, and the acquisitions we make could reduce, rather than increase, our per-unit cash flows from operations.
92
EQUITY OFFERINGS
See Note 5—Equity and Partners’ Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
WES common and general partner units. Under the Exchange Agreement, 9,060,641 common units were canceled and 9,060,641 general partner units were issued to the general partner. In February 2019, we issued 234,053,065 common units in connection with the Merger closing. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 5—Equity and Partners’ Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
WES Operating common units. In February 2019, WES Operating (i) converted the IDRs and general partner units into 105,624,704 common units in connection with the Merger closing, and (ii) issued 45,760,201 common units as part of the AMA acquisition.
WES Operating Class C units. All outstanding Class C units converted into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis immediately prior to the Merger closing.
WES Operating Series A Preferred units. In 2016, WES Operating issued 21,922,831 Series A Preferred units to private investors. Pursuant to an agreement between WES Operating and the holders of the WES Operating Series A Preferred units, 50% of the WES Operating Series A Preferred units converted into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis on March 1, 2017, and all remaining WES Operating Series A Preferred units converted into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis on May 2, 2017. See Note 5—Equity and Partners’ Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
93
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OPERATING RESULTS
The following tables and discussion present a summary of our results of operations:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Total revenues and other (1) | $ | 2,746,174 | $ | 2,299,658 | $ | 2,429,614 | ||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates | 237,518 | 195,469 | 115,141 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses (1) | 1,750,943 | 1,635,157 | 1,905,327 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net | (1,406 | ) | 1,312 | 132,388 | ||||||||
Proceeds from business interruption insurance claims (2) | — | — | 29,882 | |||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 1,231,343 | 861,282 | 801,698 | |||||||||
Interest income – affiliates | 16,900 | 16,900 | 16,900 | |||||||||
Interest expense | (303,286 | ) | (183,831 | ) | (142,520 | ) | ||||||
Other income (expense), net | (123,785 | ) | (4,763 | ) | 1,384 | |||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 821,172 | 689,588 | 677,462 | |||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense | 13,472 | 58,934 | (59,923 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | 807,700 | 630,654 | 737,385 | |||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 110,459 | 79,083 | 196,595 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Midstream Partners, LP (3) | $ | 697,241 | $ | 551,571 | $ | 540,790 | ||||||
Key performance metrics (4) | ||||||||||||
Adjusted gross margin | $ | 2,428,077 | $ | 1,978,205 | $ | 1,519,869 | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 1,719,090 | 1,466,445 | 1,169,651 | |||||||||
Distributable cash flow | 1,325,445 | 1,139,587 | 1,010,850 |
(1) | Revenues and other include amounts earned from services provided to our affiliates and from the sale of residue gas and NGLs to our affiliates. Operating expenses include amounts charged by our affiliates for services and reimbursements of amounts paid by affiliates to third parties on our behalf. See Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
(2) | See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
(3) | For reconciliations to comparable consolidated results of WES Operating, see Items Affecting the Comparability of Financial Results with WES Operating within this Item 7. |
(4) | Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, and Distributable cash flow are defined under the caption How We Evaluate Our Operations within this Item 7. For reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, see How We Evaluate Our Operations—Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures within this Item 7. |
For purposes of the following discussion, any increases or decreases “for the year ended December 31, 2019” refer to the comparison of the year ended December 31, 2019, to the year ended December 31, 2018, and any increases or decreases “for the year ended December 31, 2018” refer to the comparison of the year ended December 31, 2018, to the year ended December 31, 2017.
94
Throughput
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2017 | Inc/ (Dec) | |||||||||||
Throughput for natural-gas assets (MMcf/d) | |||||||||||||||
Gathering, treating, and transportation (1) | 528 | 546 | (3 | )% | 958 | (43 | )% | ||||||||
Processing (1) | 3,497 | 3,231 | 8 | % | 2,592 | 25 | % | ||||||||
Equity investment (2) | 398 | 291 | 37 | % | 290 | — | % | ||||||||
Total throughput | 4,423 | 4,068 | 9 | % | 3,840 | 6 | % | ||||||||
Throughput attributable to noncontrolling interests (3) | 175 | 170 | 3 | % | 179 | (5 | )% | ||||||||
Total throughput attributable to WES for natural-gas assets | 4,248 | 3,898 | 9 | % | 3,661 | 6 | % | ||||||||
Throughput for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets (MBbls/d) | |||||||||||||||
Gathering, treating, transportation, and disposal | 876 | 534 | 64 | % | 258 | 107 | % | ||||||||
Equity investment (4) | 343 | 241 | 42 | % | 148 | 63 | % | ||||||||
Total throughput | 1,219 | 775 | 57 | % | 406 | 91 | % | ||||||||
Throughput attributable to noncontrolling interests (3) | 24 | 15 | 60 | % | 8 | 88% | |||||||||
Total throughput attributable to WES for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets | 1,195 | 760 | 57 | % | 398 | 91 | % |
(1) | The combination of the DBM complex and DBJV and Haley systems, effective January 1, 2018, into a single complex now is referred to as the “West Texas complex,” and resulted in DBJV and Haley systems throughput previously reported as “Gathering, treating, and transportation” now being reported as “Processing.” |
(2) | Represents the 14.81% share of average Fort Union throughput, 22% share of average Rendezvous throughput, 50% share of average Mi Vida and Ranch Westex throughput, and 30% share of average Red Bluff Express throughput. |
(3) | For all periods presented, includes (i) the 25% third-party interest in Chipeta and (ii) the 2.0% Occidental subsidiary-owned limited partner interest in WES Operating, which collectively represent WES’s noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2019. For a discussion of the impact to noncontrolling interests as a result of the Merger closing, see Noncontrolling interests within Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
(4) | Represents the 10% share of average White Cliffs throughput; 25% share of average Mont Belvieu JV throughput; 20% share of average TEG, TEP, Whitethorn, and Saddlehorn throughput; 33.33% share of average FRP throughput; and 15% share of average Panola and Cactus II throughput. |
Natural-gas assets
Gathering, treating, and transportation throughput decreased by 18 MMcf/d for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to production declines in areas around the Springfield gas-gathering system. This decrease was partially offset by (i) increased throughput on the MIGC system due to new third-party customer volumes beginning in the second quarter of 2019 and (ii) increased production in areas around the Marcellus Interest systems.
Gathering, treating, and transportation throughput decreased by 412 MMcf/d for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to (i) the combination of the DBM complex and DBJV and Haley systems into a single complex now referred to as the “West Texas complex,” which resulted in DBJV and Haley systems throughput previously reported as “Gathering, treating, and transportation” now being reported as “Processing” (decrease of 258 MMcf/d) and (ii) the divestiture of the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest as part of the March 2017 Property Exchange (decrease of 158 MMcf/d).
95
Processing throughput increased by 266 MMcf/d for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to (i) the start-up of Mentone Trains I and II at the West Texas complex in November 2018 and March 2019, respectively, and (ii) increased production in areas around the West Texas and DJ Basin complexes. These increases were partially offset by (i) volumes being diverted away from the Granger straddle plant beginning in the fourth quarter of 2019 resulting from changes to the product mix of a third-party customer and (ii) downstream constraints during the third quarter of 2019 that impacted our DJ Basin complex.
Processing throughput increased by 639 MMcf/d for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to (i) the combination of the DBM complex and DBJV and Haley systems into the West Texas complex, (ii) increased production in the areas around the DJ Basin and West Texas complexes, (iii) the start-up of Train VI at the West Texas complex in December 2017, (iv) increased throughput at the West Texas complex due to the acquisition of the Additional DBJV System Interest as part of the March 2017 Property Exchange, and (v) increased throughput at the MGR assets due to increased uptime compared to 2017. These increases were partially offset by lower throughput at the Chipeta complex due to downstream fractionation capacity constraints in the third quarter of 2018 and the expiration and non-renewal of a contract in September 2017.
Equity-investment throughput increased by 107 MMcf/d for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to the acquisition of the interest in Red Bluff Express in January 2019, partially offset by decreased throughput at the Mi Vida and Ranch Westex plants due to affiliate volumes being diverted to the West Texas complex for processing following the start-up of Mentone Trains I and II in November 2018 and March 2019, respectively.
Crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets
Gathering, treating, transportation, and disposal throughput increased by 342 MBbls/d for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to (i) increased throughput at the DBM water systems due to new water-disposal systems that commenced operations during the third and fourth quarters of 2018, (ii) increased throughput at the DBM oil system due to the commencement of ROTF operations in the second quarter of 2018 and increased production in the area, and (iii) increased production in areas around the DJ Basin oil system.
Gathering, treating, transportation, and disposal throughput increased by 276 MBbls/d for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to (i) increased throughput from the DBM water systems that commenced operations beginning in the second quarter of 2017 and (ii) increased throughput at the DBM oil system due to the commencement of ROTF operations beginning in the second quarter of 2018.
Equity-investment throughput increased by 102 MBbls/d for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to (i) the acquisition of our interest in Whitethorn LLC in June 2018 and increased volumes on the Whitethorn pipeline due to additional committed volumes in 2019, (ii) the acquisition of our interest in Cactus II in June 2018, which began delivering crude oil during the third quarter of 2019, and (iii) increased volumes on the Saddlehorn pipeline due to incentive tariffs and additional committed volumes effective beginning in the third quarter of 2019.
Equity-investment throughput increased by 93 MBbls/d for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to (i) the acquisition of our interest in Whitethorn LLC in June 2018 and (ii) increased volumes on TEP and FRP as a result of increased NGLs production in the DJ Basin area.
96
Service Revenues
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2017 | Inc/ (Dec) | |||||||||||||
Service revenues – fee based | $ | 2,388,191 | $ | 1,905,728 | 25 | % | $ | 1,357,876 | 40 | % | ||||||||
Service revenues – product based | 70,127 | 88,785 | (21 | )% | — | NM | ||||||||||||
Total service revenues | $ | 2,458,318 | $ | 1,994,513 | 23 | % | $ | 1,357,876 | 47 | % |
NM—Not Meaningful
Service revenues – fee based
Service revenues – fee based increased by $482.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increases of (i) $266.8 million at the West Texas complex due to a higher average gathering fee effective January 2019 ($186.3 million) and increased throughput ($80.5 million), (ii) $106.1 million at the DBM water systems due to increased throughput and new gathering and disposal agreements effective July 1, 2018, (iii) $67.9 million at the DJ Basin complex due to increased throughput and a higher average processing fee, (iv) $48.6 million at the DBM oil system due to increased throughput and a higher average gathering fee due to a new agreement effective May 2018, and (v) $37.2 million at the DJ Basin oil system due to increased throughput, a higher average gathering fee, and an annual cost-of-service rate adjustment made during the fourth quarter of 2019. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $32.6 million at the Springfield system due to decreased volumes and an annual cost-of-service rate adjustment in the fourth quarter of 2019.
Service revenues – fee based increased by $547.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to increases of (i) $154.5 million from the adoption of Topic 606, as discussed under Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results within this Item 7, (ii) $141.3 million, $71.5 million, and $19.1 million at the West Texas complex and DBM and DJ Basin oil systems, respectively, due to increased throughput, (iii) $112.7 million at the DJ Basin complex due to increased throughput ($91.3 million) and a higher processing fee ($21.4 million), and (iv) $78.4 million at the DBM water systems that commenced operations beginning in the second quarter of 2017. These increases were partially offset by decreases of (i) $22.1 million due to the divestiture of the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest as part of the March 2017 Property Exchange and (ii) $10.4 million at the Springfield system due to a lower cost-of-service rate.
Service revenues – product based
Service revenues – product based decreased by $18.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to (i) a decrease in volumes and pricing across several systems and (ii) a third-party producer contract termination at the West Texas complex at the end of the first quarter of 2019.
Service revenues – product based increased by $88.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, due to the adoption of Topic 606. As discussed under Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results within this Item 7, under Topic 606, certain of our customer agreements result in revenues being recognized when the natural gas and/or NGLs are received from the customer as non-cash consideration for services provided. In addition, retained proceeds from sales of customer products, where we are acting as their agent, are included in Service revenues – product based.
97
Product Sales
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages and per-unit amounts | 2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2017 | Inc/ (Dec) | |||||||||||||
Natural-gas sales (1) | $ | 66,557 | $ | 85,015 | (22 | )% | $ | 391,393 | (78 | )% | ||||||||
NGLs sales (1) | 219,831 | 218,005 | 1 | % | 659,817 | (67 | )% | |||||||||||
Total Product sales | $ | 286,388 | $ | 303,020 | (5 | )% | $ | 1,051,210 | (71 | )% | ||||||||
Per-unit gross average sales price (1): | ||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas (per Mcf) | $ | 1.65 | $ | 2.16 | (24 | )% | $ | 2.92 | (26 | )% | ||||||||
NGLs (per Bbl) | 20.93 | 31.55 | (34 | )% | 23.88 | 32 | % |
(1) | For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, includes the effects of commodity-price swap agreements for the MGR assets and DJ Basin complex, excluding the amounts considered above market with respect to these swap agreements that were recorded as capital contributions in the consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital. See Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
Natural-gas sales
Natural-gas sales decreased by $18.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to decreases of $24.0 million and $7.2 million at the West Texas and DJ Basin complexes, respectively, due to decreases in average prices, partially offset by increases in volumes sold. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $13.7 million at the Hilight system primarily due to the reversal of a portion of an accrual for anticipated product-purchase costs recorded in 2018 associated with the shutdown of the Kitty Draw gathering system (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K).
Natural-gas sales decreased by $306.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to decreases of (i) $258.9 million from the adoption of Topic 606, as discussed under Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results within this Item 7, (ii) $24.6 million at the West Texas complex due to a decrease in average price, partially offset by an increase in volumes sold, and (iii) $5.7 million due to a decrease in average price and $9.3 million due to the shutdown of the Kitty Draw gathering system, both at the Hilight system.
NGLs sales
NGLs sales increased by $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increases of (i) $17.7 million at the DJ Basin complex due to an increase in volumes sold, (ii) $7.1 million related to commodity-price swap agreements that expired in December 2018, and (iii) $3.2 million at the DBM water systems due to an increase in volumes sold related to byproducts from the treatment of produced water. These increases were partially offset by decreases of (i) $14.3 million and $7.6 million at the MGR assets and Granger complex, respectively, due to decreases in average prices and volumes sold, and (ii) $6.1 million at the Chipeta complex due to a decrease in average price.
NGLs sales decreased by $441.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to a decrease of $844.0 million from the adoption of Topic 606, as discussed under Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Financial Results within this Item 7. This decrease was partially offset by increases of (i) $256.8 million at the West Texas complex due to an increase in volumes sold, partially offset by a decrease in average price, (ii) $48.2 million at the DJ Basin complex due to an increase in the swap market price and volumes sold, (iii) $39.0 million at the DJ Basin oil system due to an increase in average price and volumes sold, (iv) $23.8 million at the Brasada complex due to volumes sold under a new sales agreement beginning January 1, 2018, and (v) $12.8 million at the DBM water systems due to an increase in volumes sold related to byproducts from the treatment of produced water.
98
Other Revenues
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2017 | Inc/ (Dec) | |||||||||||||
Other revenues | $ | 1,468 | $ | 2,125 | (31 | )% | $ | 20,528 | (90 | )% |
For the year ended December 31, 2018, Other revenues decreased by $18.4 million, primarily due to deficiency fees of $8.8 million at the Chipeta complex and $7.2 million at the DBM water systems in 2017. Upon adoption of Topic 606 on January 1, 2018, deficiency fees are recorded as Service revenues – fee based in the consolidated statements of operations (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K).
Equity Income, Net – Affiliates
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2017 | Inc/ (Dec) | |||||||||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates | $ | 237,518 | $ | 195,469 | 22 | % | $ | 115,141 | 70 | % |
Equity income, net – affiliates increased by $42.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to (i) the acquisition of our interest in Whitethorn LLC in June 2018 and increased volumes on the Whitethorn pipeline due to additional committed volumes in 2019, (ii) increased volumes at FRP and the Saddlehorn pipeline, and (iii) the acquisition of our interest in Cactus II in June 2018, which began delivering crude oil during the third quarter of 2019. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in volumes at TEP.
Equity income, net – affiliates increased by $80.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to (i) the acquisition of our interest in Whitethorn LLC in June 2018 and (ii) increased volumes at the TEFR Interests, Saddlehorn pipeline, Mi Vida, and Ranch Westex. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in volumes at the Fort Union system.
Cost of Product and Operation and Maintenance Expenses
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2017 | Inc/ (Dec) | |||||||||||||
NGLs purchases (1) | $ | 331,872 | $ | 292,698 | 13 | % | $ | 573,309 | (49 | )% | ||||||||
Residue purchases (1) | 100,570 | 125,106 | (20 | )% | 367,179 | (66 | )% | |||||||||||
Other | 11,805 | (2,299 | ) | NM | 13,304 | (117 | )% | |||||||||||
Cost of product | 444,247 | 415,505 | 7 | % | 953,792 | (56 | )% | |||||||||||
Operation and maintenance | 641,219 | 480,861 | 33 | % | 345,617 | 39 | % | |||||||||||
Total Cost of product and Operation and maintenance expenses | $ | 1,085,466 | $ | 896,366 | 21 | % | $ | 1,299,409 | (31 | )% |
(1) | For the year ended December 31, 2017, includes the effects of the commodity-price swap agreements for the MGR assets and DJ Basin complex, excluding the amounts considered above market with respect to these swap agreements that were recorded as capital contributions in the consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital. See Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
99
NGLs purchases
NGLs purchases increased by $39.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increases of (i) $48.1 million and $10.6 million at the West Texas and DJ Basin complexes, respectively, primarily due to increases in volumes purchased and (ii) $3.3 million at the DBM water systems due to an increase in volumes purchased related to byproducts from the treatment of produced water. These increases were partially offset by decreases of (i) $9.8 million and $6.3 million at the MGR assets and Granger complex, respectively, due to decreases in average prices and volumes purchased and (ii) $7.4 million at the Chipeta complex due to a decrease in average price.
NGLs purchases decreased by $280.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to a decrease of $690.2 million from the adoption of Topic 606, as discussed under Items Affecting the Comparability of Financial Results within this Item 7, partially offset by increases of (i) $269.5 million at the West Texas complex due to an increase in volumes purchased, (ii) $50.4 million and $40.4 million at the DJ Basin complex and DJ Basin oil system, respectively, due to increases in average prices and volumes purchased, (iii) $22.0 million at the Brasada complex due to volumes purchased under a new purchase agreement beginning January 1, 2018, and (iv) $11.8 million at the DBM water systems, which commenced operation beginning in the second quarter of 2017.
Residue purchases
Residue purchases decreased by $24.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to decreases of (i) $16.8 million at the West Texas complex due to a decrease in average price, partially offset by an increase in volumes purchased, (ii) $3.8 million at the MGR assets due to a decrease in volumes purchased, and (iii) $2.7 million at the Hilight system due to decreases in volumes purchased and average price.
Residue purchases decreased by $242.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to decreases of (i) $222.6 million from the adoption of Topic 606, as discussed under Items Affecting the Comparability of Financial Results within this Item 7, (ii) $12.9 million at the West Texas complex due to a decrease in average price, partially offset by an increase in volumes purchased, (iii) $6.8 million at the MGR assets due to decreases in average price and volumes purchased, and (iv) $5.0 million at the Hilight system due to a decrease in volumes purchased. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $5.7 million at the DJ Basin complex due to an increase in volumes purchased, partially offset by a decrease in average price.
Other items
Other items increased by $14.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increases of (i) $8.4 million at the West Texas complex due to changes in imbalance positions and an increase in volumes purchased and (ii) $4.0 million at the DJ Basin complex due to an increase in transportation costs.
Other items decreased by $15.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to decreases of (i) $9.8 million from the adoption of Topic 606, as discussed under Items Affecting the Comparability of Financial Results within this Item 7 and (ii) $6.6 million from changes in imbalance positions primarily at the West Texas complex.
Operation and maintenance expense
Operation and maintenance expense increased by $160.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increases of (i) $51.1 million at the DBM water systems due to new water-disposal systems that commenced operations during the third and fourth quarters of 2018 and higher surface-use fees, (ii) $39.0 million, $32.3 million, and $17.9 million at the West Texas complex, DJ Basin complex, and DBM oil system, respectively, primarily due to increases in surface maintenance and plant repairs, salaries and wages, utilities expense, and contract labor and consulting services, (iii) $6.9 million at the DJ Basin oil system due to increases in surface maintenance and plant repairs, salaries and wages, and utilities expense, and (iv) $5.9 million at the Springfield system due to increases in surface maintenance and plant repairs and safety expense.
Operation and maintenance expense increased by $135.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to increases of (i) $62.2 million at the West Texas complex due to increases in salaries and wages, surface maintenance and plant repairs, utilities expense, and equipment rentals, (ii) $29.2 million at the DBM water systems, which commenced operation beginning in the second quarter of 2017, (iii) $25.4 million at the DJ Basin complex due to increases in utilities expense, surface maintenance and plant repairs, and salaries and wages, and (iv) $14.8 million at the DBM oil system due to increases in surface maintenance and plant repairs, salaries and wages, and chemicals and treating services.
100
Other Operating Expenses
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2017 | Inc/ (Dec) | |||||||||||||
General and administrative (1) | $ | 114,591 | $ | 67,195 | 71 | % | $ | 53,949 | 25 | % | ||||||||
Property and other taxes | 61,352 | 51,848 | 18 | % | 53,147 | (2 | )% | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 483,255 | 389,164 | 24 | % | 318,771 | 22 | % | |||||||||||
Impairments | 6,279 | 230,584 | (97 | )% | 180,051 | 28 | % | |||||||||||
Total other operating expenses | $ | 665,477 | $ | 738,791 | (10 | )% | $ | 605,918 | 22 | % |
(1) | Includes general and administrative expenses incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, and a management services fee for expenses incurred by Anadarko for periods prior to the acquisition of such assets. |
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $47.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increases of (i) $46.1 million of personnel costs for which we reimbursed Occidental pursuant to the omnibus agreements, primarily as a result of the rate-redetermination provisions in the omnibus agreements with Occidental, resulting in a 30% increase in reimbursements for general and administrative expenses incurred on our behalf, which took effect January 1, 2019, and (ii) $6.3 million of expenses related to equity awards. These amounts were partially offset by a decrease of $4.4 million in legal and consulting fees.
General and administrative expenses increased by $13.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to (i) legal and consulting fees incurred in 2018 and (ii) personnel costs for which we reimbursed Occidental pursuant to the omnibus agreements. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in bad debt expense.
Property and other taxes
Property and other taxes increased by $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to ad valorem tax increases (i) at the West Texas complex due to the start-up of Mentone Train I in November 2018 and (ii) at the DJ Basin complex due to the completion of capital projects.
Property and other taxes decreased by $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to ad valorem tax decreases of $5.8 million at the DJ Basin complex caused by revisions in estimated tax liabilities, offset by increases of $2.5 million and $2.1 million at the West Texas complex and the DJ Basin oil system, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization expense
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $94.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increases of (i) $36.4 million at the West Texas complex, (ii) $24.8 million at the DBM water systems, (iii) $13.6 million at the DBM oil system, and (iv) $8.2 million at the DJ Basin complex, all due to capital projects being placed into service. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2019, there was an increase of $7.5 million at the Hilight system, primarily due to an acceleration of depreciation expense and revisions in cost estimates related to asset retirement obligations. For further information regarding capital projects, see Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital expenditures within this Item 7.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $70.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to increases of (i) $30.4 million, $12.9 million, and $10.8 million at the West Texas complex, DBM water systems, and DBM oil system, respectively, due to capital projects being placed into service and (ii) $17.1 million at the DJ Basin complex related to the shutdown of the Third Creek gathering system (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K).
101
Impairment expense
Impairment expense for the year ended December 31, 2019, was primarily due to impairments of $4.9 million at the DJ Basin complex.
Impairment expense for the year ended December 31, 2018, was primarily due to impairments of (i) $125.9 million at the Third Creek gathering system and $8.1 million at the Kitty Draw gathering system (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K), (ii) $38.7 million at the Hilight system, (iii) $34.6 million at the MIGC system, (iv) $10.9 million at the GNB NGL pipeline, (v) $5.6 million at the Chipeta complex, and (vi) $2.6 million at the DBM oil system.
Impairment expense for the year ended December 31, 2017, included (i) a $158.8 million impairment at the Granger complex, (ii) an $8.2 million impairment at the Hilight system, (iii) a $3.7 million impairment at the Granger straddle plant, (iv) a $3.1 million impairment at the Fort Union system, (v) a $2.0 million impairment of an idle facility in northeast Wyoming, and (vi) an impairment related to the cancellation of a pipeline project in West Texas.
For further information on impairment expense for the periods presented, see Note 8—Property, Plant, and Equipment in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Interest Income – Affiliates and Interest Expense
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2017 | Inc/ (Dec) | |||||||||||||
Note receivable – Anadarko | $ | 16,900 | $ | 16,900 | — | % | $ | 16,900 | — | % | ||||||||
Interest income – affiliates | $ | 16,900 | $ | 16,900 | — | % | $ | 16,900 | — | % | ||||||||
Third parties | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | $ | (315,872 | ) | $ | (200,454 | ) | 58 | % | $ | (143,400 | ) | 40 | % | |||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs and commitment fees | (12,424 | ) | (9,110 | ) | 36 | % | (7,970 | ) | 14 | % | ||||||||
Capitalized interest | 26,980 | 32,479 | (17 | )% | 9,074 | NM | ||||||||||||
Affiliates | ||||||||||||||||||
APCWH Note Payable | (1,833 | ) | (6,746 | ) | (73 | )% | (153 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Finance lease liabilities | (137 | ) | — | NM | — | NM | ||||||||||||
Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko | — | — | NM | (71 | ) | (100 | )% | |||||||||||
Interest expense | $ | (303,286 | ) | $ | (183,831 | ) | 65 | % | $ | (142,520 | ) | 29 | % |
Interest expense increased by $119.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to (i) $74.9 million of interest incurred on the Term loan facility entered into in December 2018, (ii) $23.4 million of interest incurred on the 4.750% Senior Notes due 2028 and 5.500% Senior Notes due 2048 that were issued in August 2018, (iii) $18.5 million due to higher outstanding borrowings on the RCF in 2019, and (iv) $9.5 million due to interest incurred on the 4.500% Senior Notes due 2028 and 5.300% Senior Notes due 2048 that were issued in March 2018.
Interest expense increased by $41.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to (i) $46.3 million of interest incurred on the 4.500% Senior Notes due 2028 and 5.300% Senior Notes due 2048 that were issued in March 2018, (ii) $15.3 million of interest incurred on the 4.750% Senior Notes due 2028 and 5.500% Senior Notes due 2048 that were issued in August 2018, and (iii) $6.6 million of interest incurred on the APCWH Note Payable. These increases were partially offset by an increase in capitalized interest of $23.4 million, primarily due to continued construction and expansion at (i) the DJ Basin complex, including construction of the Latham processing plant beginning in 2018, (ii) the West Texas complex, including construction of the Mentone processing plant beginning in the fourth quarter of 2017, and (iii) the DBM oil system, including construction of the ROTFs that commenced operations in 2018.
102
Other Income (Expense), Net
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2017 | Inc/ (Dec) | |||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | $ | (123,785 | ) | $ | (4,763 | ) | NM | $ | 1,384 | NM |
Other income (expense), net decreased by $119.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to a net loss of $125.3 million on interest-rate swaps that were cash-settled in December 2019. See Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
Other income (expense), net decreased by $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to a non-cash loss of $8.0 million on interest-rate swaps entered into in December 2018. See Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2017 | Inc/ (Dec) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 821,172 | $ | 689,588 | 19 | % | $ | 677,462 | 2 | % | ||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense | 13,472 | 58,934 | (77 | )% | (59,923 | ) | (198 | )% | ||||||||||
Effective tax rate | 2 | % | 9 | % | NM |
We are not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, our income apportionable to Texas is subject to Texas margin tax. For the periods presented, the variance from the federal statutory rate, which is zero percent as a non-taxable entity, is primarily due to federal and state taxes on pre-acquisition income attributable to assets previously acquired from Anadarko, and our share of Texas margin tax.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, AMA recognized a one-time deferred tax benefit of $87.3 million due to the impact of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed into law on December 22, 2017. This was offset by federal and state taxes on pre-acquisition income attributable to the AMA assets acquired from Anadarko and our share of Texas margin tax.
Income attributable to the AMA assets prior to and including February 2019 was subject to federal and state income tax. Income earned on the AMA assets for periods subsequent to February 2019 was only subject to Texas margin tax on income apportionable to Texas.
103
KEY PERFORMANCE METRICS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
thousands except percentages and per-unit amounts | 2019 | 2018 | Inc/ (Dec) | 2017 | Inc/ (Dec) | |||||||||||||
Adjusted gross margin for natural-gas assets (1) | $ | 1,656,041 | $ | 1,443,466 | 15 | % | $ | 1,256,160 | 15 | % | ||||||||
Adjusted gross margin for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets (1) | 772,036 | 534,739 | 44 | % | 263,709 | 103 | % | |||||||||||
Adjusted gross margin (1) (2) | 2,428,077 | 1,978,205 | 23 | % | 1,519,869 | 30 | % | |||||||||||
Per-Mcf Adjusted gross margin for natural-gas assets (3) | 1.07 | 1.01 | 6 | % | 0.94 | 7 | % | |||||||||||
Per-Bbl Adjusted gross margin for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets (4) | 1.77 | 1.93 | (8 | )% | 1.82 | 6 | % | |||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (2) | 1,719,090 | 1,466,445 | 17 | % | 1,169,651 | 25 | % | |||||||||||
Distributable cash flow (2) | 1,325,445 | 1,139,587 | 16 | % | 1,010,850 | 13 | % |
(1) | Adjusted gross margin is calculated as total revenues and other (less reimbursements for electricity-related expenses recorded as revenue), less cost of product, plus distributions from our equity investments, and excluding the noncontrolling interests owners’ proportionate share of revenues and cost of product. |
(2) | For a reconciliation of Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, and Distributable cash flow to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, see the descriptions under How We Evaluate Our Operations—Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures within this Item 7. |
(3) | Average for period. Calculated as Adjusted gross margin for natural-gas assets, divided by total throughput (MMcf/d) attributable to WES for natural-gas assets. |
(4) | Average for period. Calculated as Adjusted gross margin for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets, divided by total throughput (MBbls/d) attributable to WES for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets. |
Adjusted gross margin. Adjusted gross margin increased by $449.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to (i) increased throughput at the West Texas and DJ Basin complexes, (ii) the start-up of new water-disposal systems during the third and fourth quarters of 2018, (iii) increased throughput and a higher average gathering fee due to a new agreement effective May 2018 at the DBM oil system, (iv) increased throughput, a higher average gathering fee, and an annual cost-of-service rate adjustment made during the fourth quarter of 2019 at the DJ Basin oil system, and (v) the acquisition of our interest in Whitethorn LLC in June 2018 and increased volumes on the Whitethorn pipeline. These increases were partially offset by decreased throughput and an annual cost-of-service rate adjustment in the fourth quarter of 2019 at the Springfield system (see Revenue and cost of product under Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K).
Adjusted gross margin increased by $458.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to (i) increased throughput at the West Texas complex and DBM oil system, (ii) increased throughput and an annual cost-of-service rate adjustment in the fourth quarter of 2018 at the DJ Basin oil system, (iii) increased throughput and a higher processing fee at the DJ Basin complex, (iv) the start-up of the DBM water systems beginning in the second quarter of 2017, (v) the acquisition of our interest in Whitethorn LLC in June 2018, (vi) the March 2017 Property Exchange, and (vii) an annual cost-of-service rate adjustment at the Springfield system in the fourth quarter of 2018 (see Revenue and cost of product under Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). These increases were partially offset by a decrease due to the shutdown of the Kitty Draw gathering system (part of the Hilight system) in 2018 (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K).
Per-Mcf Adjusted gross margin for natural-gas assets increased by $0.06 for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increased throughput at the West Texas complex, which has a higher-than-average per-Mcf margin as compared to our other natural-gas assets.
Per-Mcf Adjusted gross margin for natural-gas assets increased by $0.07 for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to (i) increased throughput at the West Texas complex, which has a higher-than-average per-Mcf margin as compared to our other natural-gas assets, (ii) the March 2017 Property Exchange, and (iii) an annual cost-of-service rate adjustment at the Springfield gas-gathering system in the fourth quarter of 2018.
104
Per-Bbl Adjusted gross margin for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets decreased by $0.16 for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increased throughput at the DBM water systems, which has a lower per-Bbl margin than our other crude-oil and NGLs assets. This decrease was partially offset by (i) increased throughput, a higher average gathering fee, and an annual cost-of-service rate adjustment made during the fourth quarter of 2019 at the DJ Basin oil system, (ii) increased throughput and a higher average gathering fee due to a new agreement effective May 2018 at the DBM oil system, and (iii) the acquisition of our interest in Whitethorn LLC in June 2018 and increased volumes on the Whitethorn pipeline.
Per-Bbl Adjusted gross margin for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets increased by $0.11 for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to (i) increased throughput and an annual cost-of-service rate adjustment in the fourth quarter of 2018 at the DJ Basin oil system, (ii) increased throughput at the DBM oil system, (iii) the acquisition of our interest in Whitethorn LLC in June 2018, (iv) higher distributions received from the TEFR Interests and the Mont Belvieu JV, and (v) an annual cost-of-service rate adjustment at the Springfield oil-gathering system in the fourth quarter of 2018. These increases were partially offset by increased throughput at the DBM water systems, which has a lower per-Bbl margin than our other crude-oil and NGLs assets.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA increased by $252.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to (i) an increase of $446.5 million in total revenues and other and (ii) an increase of $47.9 million in distributions from equity investments. These amounts were partially offset by (i) an increase of $160.4 million in operation and maintenance expenses, (ii) an increase of $40.3 million in general and administrative expenses excluding non-cash equity-based compensation expense, (iii) an increase of $29.3 million in cost of product (net of lower of cost or market inventory adjustments), and (iv) an increase of $9.5 million in property taxes.
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $296.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to (i) a $538.9 million decrease in cost of product (net of lower of cost or market inventory adjustments) and (ii) a $68.2 million increase in distributions from equity investments. These amounts were partially offset by (i) a $135.2 million increase in operation and maintenance expenses, (ii) a $130.0 million decrease in total revenues and other, (iii) a $29.9 million decrease in business interruption proceeds, and (iv) an $11.1 million increase in general and administrative expenses excluding non-cash equity-based compensation expense.
Distributable cash flow. Distributable cash flow increased by $185.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to (i) an increase of $252.6 million in Adjusted EBITDA and (ii) $91.3 million of customer billings in excess of the amount recognized as Service revenues – fee based. These amounts were partially offset by (i) an increase of $113.9 million in net cash paid for interest expense, (ii) a decrease of $44.2 million in the above-market component of the swap agreements with Anadarko, and (iii) an increase of $3.7 million in cash paid for maintenance capital expenditures. For the year ended December 31, 2019, Distributable cash flow excludes cash payments of $107.7 million related to the settlement of interest-rate swap agreements. See the definition of Distributable cash flow under How We Evaluate Our Operations within this Item 7 and see Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Distributable cash flow increased by $128.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to (i) a $296.8 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA and (ii) a $7.5 million decrease in WES Operating Series A Preferred unit distributions. These amounts were partially offset by (i) a $64.8 million increase in net cash paid for interest expense, (ii) $62.5 million of customer billings less than the amount recognized as Service revenues – fee based, (iii) a $43.3 million increase in cash paid for maintenance capital expenditures, and (iv) a $6.9 million decrease in the above-market component of the swap agreements with Anadarko.
105
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary cash requirements are for capital expenditures, debt service, customary operating expenses, quarterly distributions, distributions to our noncontrolling interest owners, and strategic acquisitions. Our sources of liquidity as of December 31, 2019, included cash and cash equivalents, cash flows generated from operations, interest income on our $260.0 million note receivable from Anadarko, available borrowing capacity under the RCF, and issuances of additional equity or debt securities. We believe that cash flows generated from these sources will be sufficient to satisfy our short-term working capital requirements, and long-term maintenance and expansion capital expenditure requirements. The amount of future distributions to unitholders will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, and other factors, and will be determined by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. Due to our cash distribution policy, we expect to rely on external financing sources, including equity and debt issuances, to fund expansion capital expenditures and future acquisitions. However, we also may use operating cash flows to fund expansion capital expenditures or acquisitions, which could result in subsequent borrowings under the RCF to pay distributions or to fund other short-term working capital requirements.
Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all of our available cash (as defined in our partnership agreement) within 55 days following each quarter’s end. Our cash flow and resulting ability to make cash distributions are completely dependent on our ability to generate favorable cash flow from operations. Generally, our available cash is our cash on hand at the end of a quarter after the payment of our expenses and the establishment of cash reserves and cash on hand resulting from working capital borrowings made after the end of the quarter. We have made cash distributions to our unitholders each quarter since our IPO in 2012 and have increased our quarterly distribution each quarter since the fourth quarter of 2012. The Board of Directors declared a cash distribution to unitholders for the fourth quarter of 2019 of $0.62200 per unit, or $281.8 million in the aggregate. The cash distribution was paid on February 13, 2020, to our unitholders of record at the close of business on January 31, 2020.
Management continuously monitors our leverage position and coordinates our capital expenditure program, quarterly distributions, and acquisition strategy with our expected cash flows and projected debt-repayment schedule. We will continue to evaluate funding alternatives, including additional borrowings and the issuance of debt or equity securities, to secure funds as needed or to refinance outstanding debt balances with longer-term debt issuances. Our ability to generate cash flows is subject to a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control. Read Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K.
Working capital. As of December 31, 2019, we had an $83.5 million working capital deficit, which we define as the amount by which current liabilities exceed current assets. Working capital is an indication of liquidity and potential need for short-term funding. Working capital requirements are driven by changes in accounts receivable and accounts payable and other factors such as credit extended to, and the timing of collections from, our customers, and the level and timing of our spending for acquisitions, maintenance, and expansion activity. The working capital deficit as of December 31, 2019, was primarily due to the costs incurred related to continued construction and expansion at the West Texas and DJ Basin complexes, DBM oil system, and DBM water systems. As of December 31, 2019, there was $1.6 billion available for borrowing under the RCF. See Note 11—Components of Working Capital and Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
106
Capital expenditures. Our business is capital intensive, requiring significant investment to maintain and improve existing facilities or to develop new midstream infrastructure. We categorize capital expenditures as one of the following:
• | maintenance capital expenditures, which include those expenditures required to maintain existing operating capacity and service capability of our assets, such as to replace system components and equipment that have been subject to significant use over time, become obsolete or reached the end of their useful lives, to remain in compliance with regulatory or legal requirements, or to complete additional well connections to maintain existing system throughput and related cash flows; or |
• | expansion capital expenditures, which include expenditures to construct new midstream infrastructure and expenditures incurred to extend the useful lives of our assets, reduce costs, increase revenues, or increase system throughput or capacity from current levels, including well connections that increase existing system throughput. |
Capital expenditures in the consolidated statements of cash flows reflect capital expenditures on a cash basis, when payments are made. Capital incurred is presented on an accrual basis. Acquisitions and capital expenditures as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows and capital incurred were as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Acquisitions | $ | 2,101,229 | $ | 162,112 | $ | 181,708 | ||||||
Expansion capital expenditures | $ | 1,064,281 | $ | 1,827,730 | $ | 949,375 | ||||||
Maintenance capital expenditures | 124,548 | 120,865 | 77,557 | |||||||||
Total capital expenditures (1) (2) | $ | 1,188,829 | $ | 1,948,595 | $ | 1,026,932 | ||||||
Capital incurred (1) (3) | $ | 1,055,151 | $ | 1,910,508 | $ | 1,252,067 |
(1) | For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, included $23.3 million, $31.1 million, and $9.1 million, respectively, of capitalized interest. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, capitalized interest included $9.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of pre-acquisition capitalized interest for AMA. |
(2) | Capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, included $762.8 million and $353.3 million, respectively, of pre-acquisition capital expenditures for AMA. Capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2017, are presented net of $1.4 million of contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates. |
(3) | Capital incurred for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, included $733.1 million and $453.4 million, respectively, of pre-acquisition capital incurred for AMA. |
Acquisitions during 2019 included AMA and the 30% interest in Red Bluff Express. Acquisitions during 2018 included a 20% interest in Whitethorn LLC, a 15% interest in Cactus II, and equipment purchases from affiliates. Acquisitions during 2017 included the Additional DBJV System Interest, the additional interest in Ranch Westex, and equipment purchases from affiliates. See Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures and Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, decreased by $759.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Expansion capital expenditures decreased by $763.4 million (including a $7.8 million decrease in capitalized interest) for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to decreases of (i) $423.8 million at the West Texas complex primarily due to the completion of Mentone Trains I and II that commenced operations in November 2018 and March 2019, respectively, (ii) $246.5 million at the DBM oil system primarily due to the completion of the ROTFs that commenced operations in the second quarter of 2018, and (iii) $196.8 million at the DBM water systems due to the completion of the water systems that commenced operations in the third and fourth quarters of 2018. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $88.1 million at the DJ Basin complex primarily due to continued construction of the Latham processing plant. Maintenance capital expenditures increased by $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increases at the DBM oil system and DJ Basin complex, partially offset by decreases at the West Texas complex and Hilight system.
107
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, increased by $921.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Expansion capital expenditures increased by $878.4 million (including a $22.0 million increase in capitalized interest) for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to increases of (i) $271.7 million at the West Texas complex, $222.4 million at the DJ Basin complex, and $182.4 million at the DBM oil system, primarily due to pipe, compression, and processing projects and (ii) $200.2 million at the DBM water systems due to produced-water gathering and disposal projects. Maintenance capital expenditures increased by $43.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to increases at the DJ Basin and West Texas complexes and the DJ Basin oil system, which were partially offset by a decrease at the DBM oil system.
For the year ending December 31, 2020, we estimate that our total capital expenditures will be between $875.0 million to $950.0 million (excluding acquisitions and including our 75% share of Chipeta’s capital expenditures and equity investments) and our maintenance capital expenditures will be between $125.0 million to $135.0 million.
Historical cash flow. The following table and discussion present a summary of our net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities, investing activities and financing activities:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): | ||||||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 1,324,100 | $ | 1,348,175 | $ | 1,042,715 | ||||||
Investing activities | (3,387,853 | ) | (2,210,813 | ) | (1,133,324 | ) | ||||||
Financing activities | 2,071,573 | 875,192 | (188,875 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 7,820 | $ | 12,554 | $ | (279,484 | ) |
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to cash payments made for the settlement of the interest-rate swap agreements, partially offset by increases in distributions from equity investments and the impact of other changes in working capital items. Net cash provided by operating activities increased for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to the impact of changes in working capital items and increases in distributions from equity investments. Refer to Operating Results within this Item 7 for a discussion of our results of operations as compared to the prior periods.
Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019, included the following:
• | $2.0 billion of cash paid for the acquisition of AMA; |
• | $1.2 billion of capital expenditures, primarily related to construction and expansion at the West Texas and DJ Basin complexes, DBM oil system, and DBM water systems; |
• | $128.4 million of capital contributions primarily paid to Cactus II, the TEFR Interests, Red Bluff Express, Whitethorn LLC, and White Cliffs for construction activities; |
• | $92.5 million of cash paid for the acquisition of our interest in Red Bluff Express; and |
• | $30.3 million of distributions received from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings. |
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018, included the following:
• | $1.9 billion of capital expenditures, primarily related to construction and expansion at the DBM oil and DBM water systems and the West Texas and DJ Basin complexes; |
• | $161.9 million of cash paid for the acquisitions of our interests in Whitethorn LLC and Cactus II; |
• | $133.6 million of capital contributions primarily paid to Cactus II, the TEFR Interests, Whitethorn LLC, and White Cliffs for construction activities; and |
108
• | $29.6 million of distributions received from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings. |
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017, included the following:
• | $1.0 billion of capital expenditures, net of $1.4 million of contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates, primarily related to construction and expansion at the DBJV system, DBM complex, DBM oil system, and DJ Basin complex and the construction of the DBM water systems; |
• | $155.3 million of cash consideration paid as part of the Property Exchange; |
• | $22.5 million of cash paid for the acquisition of the additional interest in Ranch Westex; |
• | $3.9 million of cash paid for equipment purchases from affiliates; |
• | $31.7 million of distributions received from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings; |
• | $23.3 million of net proceeds from the sale of the Helper and Clawson systems in Utah; and |
• | $23.0 million of proceeds from property insurance claims attributable to the incident at the DBM complex in 2015. |
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019, included the following:
• | $3.0 billion of borrowings under the Term loan facility, net of issuance costs, which were used to fund the acquisition of AMA, repay the APCWH Note Payable, and repay amounts outstanding under the RCF; |
• | $1.2 billion of borrowings under the RCF, which were used for general partnership purposes, including to fund capital expenditures; |
• | $458.8 million of net contributions from Anadarko representing intercompany transactions attributable to the acquisition of AMA; |
• | $11.0 million of borrowings under the APCWH Note Payable, which were used to fund the construction of the DBM water systems; |
• | $7.4 million of capital contributions from Anadarko related to the above-market component of swap agreements; |
• | $1.0 billion of repayments of outstanding borrowings under the RCF; |
• | $969.1 million of distributions paid to WES unitholders; |
• | $439.6 million of repayments of the total outstanding balance under the APCWH Note Payable; |
• | $118.2 million of distributions paid to the noncontrolling interest owners of WES Operating; |
• | $28.0 million of repayments of the total outstanding balance under the WGP RCF, which matured in March 2019; and |
• | $9.7 million of distributions paid to the noncontrolling interest owner of Chipeta. |
109
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018, included the following:
• | $1.08 billion of net proceeds from the offering of the 4.500% Senior Notes due 2028 and 5.300% Senior Notes due 2048 in March 2018, after underwriting and original issue discounts and offering costs, which were used to repay amounts outstanding under the RCF and for general partnership purposes, including to fund capital expenditures; |
• | $738.1 million of net proceeds from the offering of the 4.750% Senior Notes due 2028 and 5.500% Senior Notes due 2048 in August 2018, after underwriting and original issue discounts and offering costs, which were used to repay the maturing 2.600% Senior Notes due August 2018, repay amounts outstanding under the RCF, and for general partnership purposes, including to fund capital expenditures; |
• | $534.2 million of borrowings under the RCF, net of extension and amendment costs, which were used for general partnership purposes, including to fund capital expenditures; |
• | $321.8 million of borrowings under the APCWH Note Payable, which were used to fund the construction of the DBM water systems; |
• | $97.8 million of net contributions from Anadarko representing intercompany transactions attributable to the acquisition of AMA; |
• | $51.6 million of capital contributions from Anadarko related to the above-market component of swap agreements; |
• | $690.0 million of repayments of outstanding borrowings under the RCF; |
• | $502.5 million of distributions paid to WES unitholders; |
• | $386.3 million of distributions paid to the noncontrolling interest owners of WES Operating; |
• | $350.0 million of principal repayment on the maturing 2.600% Senior Notes due August 2018; |
• | $13.5 million of distributions paid to the noncontrolling interest owner of Chipeta; and |
• | $3.4 million of issuance costs incurred in connection with the Term loan facility. |
Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017, included the following:
• | $370.0 million of borrowings under the RCF, which were used for general partnership purposes, including funding of capital expenditures; |
• | $126.9 million of net contributions from Anadarko representing intercompany transactions attributable to the acquisition of AMA; |
• | $98.8 million of borrowings under the APCWH Note Payable, which were used to fund the construction of the DBM water systems; |
• | $58.6 million of capital contributions from Anadarko related to the above-market component of swap agreements; |
• | $442.0 million of distributions paid to WES unitholders; |
• | $355.6 million of distributions paid to the noncontrolling interest owners of WES Operating; |
• | $37.3 million of cash paid to Anadarko for the settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko; and |
• | $13.6 million of distributions paid to the noncontrolling interest owner of Chipeta. |
110
Debt and credit facilities. As of December 31, 2019, the carrying value of outstanding debt was $8.0 billion. See Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
WES Operating Senior Notes. At December 31, 2019, WES Operating was in compliance with all covenants under the relevant governing indentures.
WGP RCF. In February 2018, we voluntarily reduced the aggregate commitment of lenders under the WGP RCF to $35.0 million. The WGP RCF, which previously was available to purchase WES Operating common units and for general partnership purposes, matured in March 2019 and the $28.0 million of outstanding borrowings were repaid.
Revolving credit facility. The RCF is expandable to a maximum of $2.5 billion and bears interest at LIBOR, plus applicable margins ranging from 1.00% to 1.50%, or an alternate base rate equal to the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.50%, or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00%, in each case plus applicable margins currently ranging from zero to 0.50%, based on WES Operating’s senior unsecured debt rating. A required quarterly facility fee is paid ranging from 0.125% to 0.250% of the commitment amount (whether drawn or undrawn), which also is based on the senior unsecured debt rating. In December 2019, WES Operating entered into an amendment to the RCF to, among other things, exercise the final one-year extension option to extend the maturity date of the RCF from February 2024 to February 2025, for each extending lender. The maturity date with respect to each non-extending lender, whose commitments represent $100.0 million out of $2.0 billion of total commitments from all lenders, remains February 2024. See Executive Summary–December 2019 Agreements within this Item 7 for more information.
As of December 31, 2019, there were $380.0 million of outstanding borrowings and $4.6 million of outstanding letters of credit, resulting in $1.6 billion of available borrowing capacity under the RCF. At December 31, 2019, the interest rate on any outstanding RCF borrowings was 3.04% and the facility fee rate was 0.20%. At December 31, 2019, WES Operating was in compliance with all covenants under the RCF.
Term loan facility. In December 2018, WES Operating entered into the Term loan facility, the proceeds from which were used to fund substantially all of the cash portion of the consideration under the Merger Agreement and the payment of related transaction costs (see Executive Summary—Merger transactions within this Item 7). The Term loan facility bears interest at LIBOR, plus applicable margins ranging from 1.000% to 1.625%, or an alternate base rate equal to the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.50%, or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00%, in each case as defined in the Term loan facility and plus applicable margins currently ranging from zero to 0.625%, based on WES Operating’s senior unsecured debt rating. Net cash proceeds received from future asset sales and debt or equity offerings must be used to repay amounts outstanding under the facility. The Term loan facility contains covenants and certain events of default that are substantially similar to those contained in the RCF.
In July 2019, WES Operating entered into an amendment to the Term loan facility to (i) extend the maturity date from February 2020 to December 2020, (ii) increase commitments available under the Term loan facility from $2.0 billion to $3.0 billion, the incremental $1.0 billion of which was subsequently drawn by WES Operating on September 13, 2019, and used to repay outstanding borrowings under the RCF, and (iii) modify the provision requiring that all debt issuance proceeds be used to repay the Term loan facility to allow for a $1.0 billion exclusion for debt-offering proceeds.
As of December 31, 2019, there were $3.0 billion of outstanding borrowings under the Term loan facility that were subject to an interest rate of 3.10%. WES Operating was in compliance with all covenants under the Term loan facility as of December 31, 2019. The outstanding borrowings under the Term loan facility were classified as Long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019. In January 2020, WES Operating repaid the outstanding borrowings under the Term loan facility with proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes and Floating Rate Notes (see Note 16—Subsequent Events in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information).
The RCF and Term loan facility contain certain covenants that limit, among other things, WES Operating’s ability, and that of certain of its subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, grant certain liens, merge, consolidate, or allow any material change in the character of its business, enter into certain affiliate transactions and use proceeds other than for partnership purposes. The RCF and Term loan facility also contain various customary covenants, certain events of default, and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter (which is defined as the ratio of consolidated indebtedness as of the last day of a fiscal quarter to Consolidated Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization for the most-recent four-consecutive fiscal quarters ending on such day) of 5.0 to 1.0, or a consolidated leverage ratio of 5.5 to 1.0 with respect to quarters ending in the 270-day period immediately following certain acquisitions.
111
Prior to December 31, 2019, WES Operating GP was indemnified by wholly owned subsidiaries of Occidental against any claims made against WES Operating GP for WES Operating’s long-term debt and/or borrowings under the RCF and Term loan facility. These indemnification agreements were terminated as part of the December 2019 Agreements. See Executive Summary–December 2019 Agreements within this Item 7 for more information.
APCWH Note Payable. In June 2017, in connection with funding the construction of the APC water systems that were acquired as part of the AMA acquisition, APCWH entered into an eight-year note payable agreement with Anadarko. This note payable had a maximum borrowing limit of $500.0 million, including accrued interest, which was payable at maturity at the applicable mid-term federal rate based on a quarterly compounding basis as determined by the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury. The APCWH Note Payable was repaid at Merger completion (see Executive Summary—Merger transactions within this Item 7).
Interest-rate swaps. In December 2018 and March 2019, WES Operating entered into interest-rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional principal amount of $750.0 million and $375.0 million, respectively, to manage interest-rate risk associated with anticipated debt issuances. Pursuant to these swap agreements, WES Operating received a floating interest rate indexed to the three-month LIBOR and paid a fixed interest rate. In November and December 2019, WES Operating entered into additional interest-rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional principal amount of $1,125.0 million. Pursuant to these swap agreements, WES Operating received a fixed interest rate and paid a floating interest rate indexed to the three-month LIBOR, effectively offsetting the swap agreements entered into in December 2018 and March 2019.
In December 2019, all outstanding interest-rate swap agreements were cash-settled. As part of the settlement, WES Operating made cash payments of $107.7 million and recorded an accrued liability of $25.6 million to be paid quarterly in 2020. These cash payments were classified as cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
We did not apply hedge accounting and, therefore, gains and losses associated with the interest-rate swap agreements were recognized in earnings. For the year ended December 31, 2019, a net loss of $125.3 million was recognized, which is included in Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
DBJV acquisition - Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko. Prior to WES Operating’s agreement with Anadarko to settle the deferred purchase price obligation early, the consideration that would have been paid for the March 2015 acquisition of DBJV from Anadarko consisted of a cash payment to Anadarko due on March 31, 2020. In May 2017, WES Operating reached an agreement with Anadarko to settle this obligation with a cash payment to Anadarko of $37.3 million, which was equal to the estimated net present value of the obligation at March 31, 2017.
Credit risk. We bear credit risk through exposure to non-payment or non-performance by our counterparties, including Occidental, financial institutions, customers, and other parties. Generally, non-payment or non-performance results from a customer’s inability to satisfy payables to us for services rendered or volumes owed pursuant to gas imbalance agreements. We examine and monitor the creditworthiness of third-party customers and may establish credit limits for third-party customers. A substantial portion of our throughput, however, comes from producers, including Occidental, that have investment-grade ratings. We are subject to the risk of non-payment or late payment by Occidental for gathering, processing, transportation, and disposal fees and for proceeds from the sale of residue, NGLs, and condensate to Occidental.
We expect our exposure to concentrated risk of non-payment or non-performance to continue for as long as we remain dependent on Occidental for over 50% of our revenues. Additionally, we are exposed to credit risk on the note receivable from Anadarko. We also are party to agreements with Occidental under which Occidental is required to indemnify us for certain environmental claims, losses arising from rights-of-way claims, failures to obtain required consents or governmental permits, and income taxes with respect to the assets previously acquired from Anadarko. See Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Our ability to make distributions to our unitholders may be adversely impacted if Occidental becomes unable to perform under the terms of gathering, processing, transportation, and disposal agreements; natural-gas and NGLs purchase agreements; Anadarko’s note payable to WES Operating; the contribution agreements; or the December 2019 Agreements (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K).
112
ITEMS AFFECTING THE COMPARABILITY OF FINANCIAL RESULTS WITH WES OPERATING
Our consolidated financial statements include the consolidated financial results of WES Operating. Our results of operations do not differ materially from the results of operations and cash flows of WES Operating, which are reconciled below.
Reconciliation of net income (loss) attributable to WES to net income (loss) attributable to WES Operating. The differences between net income (loss) attributable to WES and net income (loss) attributable to WES Operating are reconciled as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to WES | $ | 697,241 | $ | 551,571 | $ | 540,790 | ||||||
Limited partner interests in WES Operating not held by WES (1) | 103,364 | 70,474 | 185,860 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses (2) | 6,819 | 4,029 | 2,872 | |||||||||
Other income (expense), net | (79 | ) | (192 | ) | (85 | ) | ||||||
Interest expense | 245 | 2,035 | 2,229 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to WES Operating | $ | 807,590 | $ | 627,917 | $ | 731,666 |
(1) | Represents the portion of net income (loss) allocated to the limited partner interests in WES Operating not held by WES. As of December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, the public held a 0%, 59.2%, and 59.6% limited partner interest in WES Operating, respectively. Certain subsidiaries of Occidental separately held a 2.0%, 9.7%, and 9.1% limited partner interest in WES Operating as of December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Immediately prior to the Merger closing, the WES Operating IDRs and the general partner units were converted into a non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating and WES Operating common units, and at Merger completion, all WES Operating common units held by the public and subsidiaries of Anadarko (other than common units held by WES, WES Operating GP, and 6.4 million common units held by a subsidiary of Anadarko) were converted into WES common units. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
(2) | Represents general and administrative expenses incurred by WES separate from, and in addition to, those incurred by WES Operating. |
113
Reconciliation of net cash provided by (used in) operating and financing activities. The differences between net cash provided by (used in) operating and financing activities for WES and WES Operating are reconciled as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
WES net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 1,324,100 | $ | 1,348,175 | $ | 1,042,715 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses (1) | 6,819 | 4,029 | 2,872 | |||||||||
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense | (1,259 | ) | (278 | ) | (247 | ) | ||||||
Changes in working capital | 2,383 | (854 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||
Other income (expense), net | (79 | ) | (192 | ) | (85 | ) | ||||||
Interest expense | 245 | 2,035 | 2,229 | |||||||||
Debt related amortization and other items, net | (20 | ) | (801 | ) | (678 | ) | ||||||
WES Operating net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 1,332,189 | $ | 1,352,114 | $ | 1,046,798 | ||||||
WES net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | $ | 2,071,573 | $ | 875,192 | $ | (188,875 | ) | |||||
Distributions to WES unitholders (2) | 969,073 | 502,457 | 441,967 | |||||||||
Distributions to WES from WES Operating (3) | (1,006,163 | ) | (507,323 | ) | (445,677 | ) | ||||||
Registration expenses related to the issuance of WES common units | 855 | — | — | |||||||||
WGP RCF costs | — | 7 | — | |||||||||
WGP RCF repayments | 28,000 | — | — | |||||||||
WES Operating net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | $ | 2,063,338 | $ | 870,333 | $ | (192,585 | ) |
(1) | Represents general and administrative expenses incurred by WES separate from, and in addition to, those incurred by WES Operating. |
(2) | Represents distributions to WES common unitholders paid under WES’s partnership agreement. See Note 4—Partnership Distributions and Note 5—Equity and Partners’ Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
(3) | Difference attributable to elimination upon consolidation of WES Operating’s distributions on partnership interests owned by WES. See Note 4—Partnership Distributions and Note 5—Equity and Partners’ Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
Noncontrolling interest. WES Operating’s noncontrolling interest consists of the 25% third-party interest in Chipeta (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information).
WES Operating distributions. WES Operating distributes all of its available cash (as defined in its partnership agreement) to WES Operating unitholders of record on the applicable record date within 45 days following each quarter’s end.
Immediately prior to the Merger closing, the WES Operating IDRs and general partner units were converted into WES Operating common units and a non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating, and at Merger completion, all WES Operating common units held by the public and subsidiaries of Anadarko (other than common units held by WES, WES Operating GP, and 6.4 million common units held by a subsidiary of Anadarko) were converted into WES common units. Beginning first quarter of 2019, WES Operating makes cash distributions to WES and WGRAH, a subsidiary of Occidental, in respect of their proportionate share of limited partner interests in WES Operating. For the quarters ended March 31, 2019, June 30, 2019, and September 30, 2019, WES Operating distributed $283.3 million, $288.1 million, and $289.7 million, respectively, to its limited partners. For the quarter ended December 31, 2019, WES Operating distributed $290.3 million to its limited partners. See Note 5.
WES Operating LTIP. Concurrent with the Merger closing, we assumed the Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan. See Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
114
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following is a summary of our contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2019. The table below excludes amounts classified as current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, other than the current portions of the categories listed within the table. It is expected that the majority of the excluded current liabilities will be paid in cash in 2020.
Obligations by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | $ | 3,007,873 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 670,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,830,000 | $ | 8,007,873 | ||||||||||||||
Interest | 331,192 | 217,990 | 207,589 | 180,963 | 180,963 | 2,136,237 | 3,254,934 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligations | 22,472 | 38,537 | — | — | 4,443 | 293,416 | 358,868 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | 140,954 | — | — | — | — | — | 140,954 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Credit facility fees | 4,133 | 4,133 | 4,133 | 4,133 | 4,133 | 530 | 21,195 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Environmental obligations | 3,528 | 907 | 468 | 320 | 203 | 12 | 5,438 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases | 1,969 | 612 | 618 | 625 | 449 | 1,209 | 5,482 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 3,512,121 | $ | 762,179 | $ | 882,808 | $ | 186,041 | $ | 190,191 | $ | 6,261,404 | $ | 11,794,744 |
Asset retirement obligations. When assets are acquired or constructed, the initial estimated asset retirement obligation is recognized in an amount equal to the net present value of the settlement obligation, with an associated increase in properties and equipment. Revisions in estimated asset retirement obligations may result from changes in estimated inflation rates, discount rates, asset retirement costs, and the estimated timing of settlement. For additional information, see Note 12—Asset Retirement Obligations in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Capital expenditures. Included in this amount are capital obligations related to our expansion projects. We have other planned capital and investment projects that are discretionary in nature, with no substantial contractual obligations made in advance of the actual expenditures. See Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Credit facility fees. For additional information on credit facility fees required under the RCF, see Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Environmental obligations. We are subject to various environmental-remediation obligations arising from federal, state, and local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal, and other environmental matters. We regularly monitor the remediation and reclamation process and the liabilities recorded and believe that the amounts reflected in our recorded environmental obligations are adequate to fund remedial actions required to comply with present laws and regulations. For additional information on environmental obligations, see Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Leases. We have entered into operating leases that extend through 2028 for corporate offices, shared field offices, and equipment supporting our operations, with both Occidental and third parties as lessors. Lease obligations to Occidental represent existing contractual operating lease obligations that may be assigned or otherwise charged to us pursuant to the reimbursement provisions of our Services Agreement. We also have subleased equipment from Occidental via finance leases extending through April 2020. The liabilities associated with these finance leases are included within Short-term debt in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 14—Leases in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
For additional information on contracts, obligations, and arrangements we and WES Operating enter into from time to time, see Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates and Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
115
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make informed judgments and estimates that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and affect the amounts of revenues and expenses recognized during the periods reported. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates, including those related to the determination of property, plant, and equipment, asset retirement obligations, litigation, environmental liabilities, income taxes, revenues, and fair values. On an annual basis, as determined by the specific agreement, management reviews and updates certain gathering rates that are based on cost-of-service agreements. These cost-of-service gathering rates are calculated using a contractually specified rate of return and estimates including long-term assumptions for capital invested, receipt volumes, and operating and maintenance expenses. See Contract balances in Note 2—Revenue from Contracts with Customers in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Although these estimates are based on management’s best available knowledge of current and expected future events, changes in facts and circumstances or discovery of new information may result in revised estimates, and actual results may differ from these estimates. Management considers the following to be its most critical accounting estimates that involve judgment and discusses the selection and development of these estimates with our general partner’s Audit Committee. For additional information concerning accounting policies, see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Impairments of tangible assets. Property, plant, and equipment generally is stated at the lower of historical cost less accumulated depreciation or fair value if impaired. Because prior acquisitions of assets from Anadarko were transfers of net assets between entities under common control, the assets acquired initially were recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value. Assets acquired in a business combination or non-monetary exchange with a third party are initially recorded at fair value. Property, plant, and equipment balances are evaluated for potential impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable from expected undiscounted cash flows from the use and eventual disposition of an asset. If the sum of the undiscounted future net cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset’s estimated fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for the excess, if any, of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value.
In assessing long-lived assets for impairments, our management evaluates changes in our business and economic conditions and their implications for recoverability of the assets’ carrying amounts. Management applies judgment in determining whether there is an indication of impairment, the grouping of assets for impairment assessment, and determinations about the future use of such assets. Significant downward revisions in production forecasts or changes in future development plans by producers, to the extent they affect our operations, may necessitate assessment of the carrying amount of the affected assets for recoverability. The primary assumptions used to estimate undiscounted future net cash flows include long-range customer production forecasts and revenue, capital, and operating expense estimates. The measure of impairments to be recognized, if any, depends upon management’s estimate of the asset’s fair value, which may be determined based on the estimates of future net cash flows or values at which similar assets were transferred in the market in recent transactions, if such data is available. See Note 8—Property, Plant, and Equipment in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a description of impairments recorded during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.
116
Fair value. Among other things, management estimates fair value (i) of long-lived assets for impairment testing, (ii) of reporting units for goodwill impairment testing when necessary, (iii) of assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination or exchanged in non-monetary transactions, (iv) for the initial measurement of asset retirement obligations, (v) for the initial measurement of environmental obligations assumed in a third-party acquisition, and (vi) of interest-rate swaps. When management is required to measure fair value and there is not a market-observable price for the asset or liability or a market-observable price for a similar asset or liability, management utilizes the cost, income, or multiples approach, depending on the quality of information available to support management’s assumptions. The cost approach is based on management’s best estimate of the current asset replacement cost. The income approach uses management’s best assumptions regarding expectations of projected cash flows and discounts the expected cash flows using a commensurate risk-adjusted discount rate. Such evaluations involve significant judgment because results are based on expected future events or conditions, such as sales prices, estimates of future throughput, capital and operating costs and the timing thereof, economic and regulatory climates, and other factors. A multiples approach uses management’s best assumptions regarding expectations of projected EBITDA and an assumed multiple of that EBITDA that a willing buyer would pay to acquire an asset. Management’s estimates of future net cash flows and EBITDA are inherently imprecise because they reflect management’s expectation of future conditions that are often outside of management’s control. However, the assumptions used reflect a market participant’s view of long-term prices, costs, and other factors, and are consistent with assumptions used in our business plans and investment decisions. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements other than short-term operating leases and standby letters of credit. The information pertaining to operating leases and standby letters of credit required for this item is provided under Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 14—Leases, and Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense, respectively, included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
117
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Commodity-price risk. Certain of our processing services are provided under percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole agreements for which Occidental is typically responsible for the marketing of the natural gas, condensate, and NGLs. Under percent-of-proceeds agreements, we receive a specified percentage of the net proceeds from the sale of residue and/or NGLs. Under keep-whole agreements, we keep 100% of the NGLs produced and the processed natural gas, or value of the natural gas, is returned to the producer, and because some of the gas is used and removed during processing, we compensate the producer for the amount of gas used and removed in processing by supplying additional gas or by paying an agreed-upon value for the gas used.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, 93% of our wellhead natural-gas volume (excluding equity investments) and 100% of our crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water throughput (excluding equity investments) were serviced under fee-based contracts. A 10% increase or decrease in commodity prices would not have a material impact on our operating income (loss), financial condition, or cash flows for the next twelve months, excluding the effect of imbalances described below.
We bear a limited degree of commodity-price risk with respect to settlement of natural-gas imbalances that arise from differences in gas volumes received into our systems and gas volumes delivered by us to customers, and for instances where actual liquids recovery or fuel usage varies from contractually stipulated amounts. Natural-gas volumes owed to or by us that are subject to monthly cash settlement are valued according to the terms of the contract as of the balance sheet dates and generally, reflect market index prices. Other natural-gas volumes owed to or by us are valued at our weighted-average cost of natural gas as of the balance sheet dates and are settled in-kind. Our exposure to the impact of changes in commodity prices on outstanding imbalances depends on the timing of settlement of the imbalances.
Interest-rate risk. The FOMC raised its target range for the federal funds rate four separate times during 2018 and has decreased its target range three times in 2019. Any future increases in the federal funds rate likely will result in an increase in short-term financing costs. As of December 31, 2019, we had $380.0 million in outstanding borrowings under the RCF and $3.0 billion in outstanding borrowings under the Term loan facility. The RCF and Term loan facility each bear interest at a rate based on LIBOR or an alternative base rate at WES Operating’s option. While a 10% change in the applicable benchmark interest rate would not materially impact interest expense on outstanding borrowings under the RCF and Term loan facility, it would impact the fair value of the Senior Notes at December 31, 2019.
Additional variable-rate debt may be issued in the future, either under the RCF or other financing sources, including commercial bank borrowings or debt issuances.
118
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
119
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT
Management of Western Midstream Partners, LP’s (the “Partnership”) general partner and Western Midstream Operating, LP’s (“WES Operating”) general partner prepared, and is responsible for, the consolidated financial statements and the other information appearing in this annual report. The consolidated financial statements present fairly the Partnership’s and WES Operating’s financial positions, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership and WES Operating include amounts that are based on estimates and judgments that Management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The Partnership’s and WES Operating’s consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm appointed by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Management has made available to KPMG LLP all of the Partnership’s and WES Operating’s financial records and related data, and the minutes of the meetings of the Board of Directors.
120
MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Partnership’s and WES Operating’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Partnership’s and WES Operating’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. This assessment was based on criteria established in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on our assessment using the COSO criteria, we concluded the Partnership’s and WES Operating’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
KPMG LLP, the Partnership’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP | |
/s/ Michael P. Ure | |
Michael P. Ure President and Chief Executive Officer Western Midstream Holdings, LLC (as general partner of Western Midstream Partners, LP) | |
/s/ Michael C. Pearl | |
Michael C. Pearl Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Western Midstream Holdings, LLC (as general partner of Western Midstream Partners, LP) | |
WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP | |
/s/ Michael P. Ure | |
Michael P. Ure President and Chief Executive Officer Western Midstream Operating GP, LLC (as general partner of Western Midstream Operating, LP) | |
/s/ Michael C. Pearl | |
Michael C. Pearl Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Western Midstream Operating GP, LLC (as general partner of Western Midstream Operating, LP) |
February 27, 2020
121
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors
Western Midstream Holdings, LLC (as general partner of Western Midstream Partners, LP) and Unitholders of Western Midstream Partners, LP:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Western Midstream Partners, LP and subsidiaries’ (the Partnership) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Partnership as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, equity and partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 27, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Partnership’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
122
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Houston, Texas
February 27, 2020
123
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors
Western Midstream Holdings, LLC (as general partner of Western Midstream Partners, LP) and Unitholders of Western Midstream Partners, LP:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Western Midstream Partners, LP and subsidiaries (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, equity and partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 27, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership has changed its method of accounting for revenue recognition effective January 1, 2018, due to the adoption of Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC Topic 606).
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
124
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Assessment of the cumulative catch-up revenue adjustment related to gas-gathering, oil-gathering, and oil-stabilization revenue contracts with customers.
As discussed in Notes 1 and 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, certain of the Partnership’s midstream services agreements have minimum-volume commitment demand fees and fees that require periodic rate redeterminations based on the related midstream facility cost-of-service. The Partnership is contractually required to redetermine the cost of service rate charged to certain of its customers annually, and as a result, a cumulative catch-up revenue adjustment related to services may be recorded. The cumulative catch-up adjustment is estimated using actual amounts for prior years and forecasted cash flows based on forecasted receipt volumes over the remaining contract term. The volatility of oil and natural-gas prices could negatively impact customers’ production activity and near-term drilling programs, which impacts the future producer volumes to be processed by the Partnership.
We identified the assessment of the cumulative catch-up revenue adjustment related to gas-gathering, oil-gathering, and oil-stabilization revenue contracts with customers as a critical audit matter. Specifically, the evaluation of the assumptions related to forecasted receipt volumes used in the forecasted cash flows to estimate the cumulative catch-up revenue adjustment required subjective auditor judgment as there is inherent uncertainty in forecasting receipt volumes over a long period of time.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Partnership’s assessment of the forecasted cash flows, including controls related to the forecasted receipt volumes. We analyzed the status of the production activity and near-term drilling programs of the Partnership’s customers using evidence from publicly available information such as press releases and company filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and compared that information to the forecasted receipt volumes. We analyzed forecasted oil and natural-gas prices using publicly available information and compared it to the trend in the forecasted receipt volumes. In addition, we compared historical receipt volume forecasts to actual results to assess the Partnership’s ability to accurately forecast.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Partnership’s auditor since 2012.
Houston, Texas
February 27, 2020
125
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands except per-unit amounts | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Revenues and other – affiliates | ||||||||||||
Service revenues – fee based | $ | 1,441,875 | $ | 1,070,066 | $ | 769,305 | ||||||
Service revenues – product based | 7,062 | 3,339 | — | |||||||||
Product sales | 158,459 | 280,306 | 753,724 | |||||||||
Other | — | — | 16,076 | |||||||||
Total revenues and other – affiliates | 1,607,396 | 1,353,711 | 1,539,105 | |||||||||
Revenues and other – third parties | ||||||||||||
Service revenues – fee based | 946,316 | 835,662 | 588,571 | |||||||||
Service revenues – product based | 63,065 | 85,446 | — | |||||||||
Product sales | 127,929 | 22,714 | 297,486 | |||||||||
Other | 1,468 | 2,125 | 4,452 | |||||||||
Total revenues and other – third parties | 1,138,778 | 945,947 | 890,509 | |||||||||
Total revenues and other | 2,746,174 | 2,299,658 | 2,429,614 | |||||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates | 237,518 | 195,469 | 115,141 | |||||||||
Operating expenses | ||||||||||||
Cost of product (1) | 444,247 | 415,505 | 953,792 | |||||||||
Operation and maintenance (1) | 641,219 | 480,861 | 345,617 | |||||||||
General and administrative (1) | 114,591 | 67,195 | 53,949 | |||||||||
Property and other taxes | 61,352 | 51,848 | 53,147 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 483,255 | 389,164 | 318,771 | |||||||||
Impairments | 6,279 | 230,584 | 180,051 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,750,943 | 1,635,157 | 1,905,327 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net (2) | (1,406 | ) | 1,312 | 132,388 | ||||||||
Proceeds from business interruption insurance claims | — | — | 29,882 | |||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 1,231,343 | 861,282 | 801,698 | |||||||||
Interest income – affiliates | 16,900 | 16,900 | 16,900 | |||||||||
Interest expense (3) | (303,286 | ) | (183,831 | ) | (142,520 | ) | ||||||
Other income (expense), net (4) | (123,785 | ) | (4,763 | ) | 1,384 | |||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 821,172 | 689,588 | 677,462 | |||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 13,472 | 58,934 | (59,923 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | 807,700 | 630,654 | 737,385 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 110,459 | 79,083 | 196,595 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Midstream Partners, LP | $ | 697,241 | $ | 551,571 | $ | 540,790 | ||||||
Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss): | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Midstream Partners, LP | $ | 697,241 | $ | 551,571 | $ | 540,790 | ||||||
Pre-acquisition net (income) loss allocated to Anadarko | (29,279 | ) | (182,142 | ) | (164,183 | ) | ||||||
General partner interest in net (income) loss | (5,637 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss) (5) | 662,325 | 369,429 | 376,607 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) per common unit – basic and diluted (5) | $ | 1.59 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.72 | ||||||
Weighted-average common units outstanding – basic and diluted | 415,794 | 218,936 | 218,931 |
(1) | Cost of product includes product purchases from affiliates (as defined in Note 1) of $254.8 million, $168.5 million, and $74.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Operation and maintenance includes charges from affiliates of $147.0 million, $115.9 million, and $82.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. General and administrative includes charges from affiliates of $101.5 million, $49.7 million, and $43.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. See Note 6. |
(2) | Includes losses related to an incident at the DBM complex for the year ended December 31, 2017. See Note 1. |
(3) | Includes affiliate amounts of $(2.0) million, $(6.7) million, and $(0.2) million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. See Note 1 and Note 13. |
(4) | Includes losses associated with the interest-rate swap agreements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. See Note 13. |
(5) | See Note 1. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
126
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, | ||||||||
thousands except number of units | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 99,962 | $ | 92,142 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net (1) | 260,512 | 221,164 | ||||||
Other current assets (2) | 41,938 | 31,458 | ||||||
Total current assets | 402,412 | 344,764 | ||||||
Note receivable – Anadarko | 260,000 | 260,000 | ||||||
Property, plant, and equipment | ||||||||
Cost | 12,355,671 | 11,258,773 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | 3,290,740 | 2,848,420 | ||||||
Net property, plant, and equipment | 9,064,931 | 8,410,353 | ||||||
Goodwill | 445,800 | 445,800 | ||||||
Other intangible assets | 809,391 | 841,408 | ||||||
Equity investments | 1,285,717 | 1,092,088 | ||||||
Other assets (3) | 78,202 | 62,792 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 12,346,453 | $ | 11,457,205 | ||||
LIABILITIES, EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts and imbalance payables | $ | 293,128 | $ | 443,343 | ||||
Short-term debt (4) | 7,873 | 28,000 | ||||||
Accrued ad valorem taxes | 35,160 | 36,986 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities (5) | 149,793 | 129,148 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 485,954 | 637,477 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities | ||||||||
Long-term debt | 7,951,565 | 4,787,381 | ||||||
APCWH Note Payable (6) | — | 427,493 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 18,899 | 280,017 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations | 336,396 | 300,024 | ||||||
Other liabilities (7) | 208,346 | 132,130 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities | 8,515,206 | 5,927,045 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 9,001,160 | 6,564,522 | ||||||
Equity and partners’ capital | ||||||||
Common units (443,971,409 and 218,937,797 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) | 3,209,947 | 951,888 | ||||||
General partner units (9,060,641 and zero units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) (8) | (14,224 | ) | — | |||||
Net investment by Anadarko | — | 1,388,018 | ||||||
Total partners’ capital | 3,195,723 | 2,339,906 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests | 149,570 | 2,552,777 | ||||||
Total equity and partners’ capital | 3,345,293 | 4,892,683 | ||||||
Total liabilities, equity and partners’ capital | $ | 12,346,453 | $ | 11,457,205 |
(1) | Accounts receivable, net includes amounts receivable from affiliates (as defined in Note 1) of $113.3 million and $72.6 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
(2) | Other current assets includes affiliate amounts of $5.0 million and $3.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
(3) | Other assets includes affiliate amounts of $60.2 million and $42.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Other assets also includes $4.5 million and $5.3 million of NGLs line fill as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
(4) | As of December 31, 2019, all amounts are considered affiliate. See Note 14. |
(5) | Accrued liabilities includes affiliate amounts of $3.1 million and $2.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
(6) | See Note 1 and Note 6. |
(7) | Other liabilities includes affiliate amounts of $97.8 million and $47.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
(8) | See Note 1. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
127
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Partners’ Capital | ||||||||||||||||||||
thousands | Net Investment by Anadarko | Common Units | General Partner Units | Noncontrolling Interests | Total | |||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 761,890 | $ | 1,048,143 | $ | — | $ | 3,062,623 | $ | 4,872,656 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 164,183 | 376,607 | — | 196,595 | 737,385 | |||||||||||||||
Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (1) | — | 58,551 | — | — | 58,551 | |||||||||||||||
WES Operating equity transactions, net (2) | — | 6,615 | — | (6,798 | ) | (183 | ) | |||||||||||||
Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owner | — | — | — | (13,569 | ) | (13,569 | ) | |||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest owners of WES Operating | — | — | — | (355,623 | ) | (355,623 | ) | |||||||||||||
Distributions to Partnership unitholders | — | (441,967 | ) | — | — | (441,967 | ) | |||||||||||||
Acquisitions from affiliates | (1,263 | ) | 1,263 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Revision to Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (3) | — | 4,165 | — | — | 4,165 | |||||||||||||||
Contributions of equity-based compensation from Anadarko | — | 4,587 | — | — | 4,587 | |||||||||||||||
Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko | 126,866 | — | — | — | 126,866 | |||||||||||||||
Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko of other assets | — | 3,189 | — | — | 3,189 | |||||||||||||||
Adjustments of net deferred tax liabilities | (1,505 | ) | — | — | — | (1,505 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other | — | (28 | ) | — | 526 | 498 | ||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 | $ | 1,050,171 | $ | 1,061,125 | $ | — | $ | 2,883,754 | $ | 4,995,050 | ||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change (4) | 629 | (14,200 | ) | — | (30,179 | ) | (43,750 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 182,142 | 369,429 | — | 79,083 | 630,654 | |||||||||||||||
Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (1) | — | 51,618 | — | — | 51,618 | |||||||||||||||
WES Operating equity transactions, net (2) | — | (19,577 | ) | — | 19,577 | — | ||||||||||||||
Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owner | — | — | — | (13,529 | ) | (13,529 | ) | |||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest owners of WES Operating | — | — | — | (386,326 | ) | (386,326 | ) | |||||||||||||
Distributions to Partnership unitholders | — | (502,457 | ) | — | — | (502,457 | ) | |||||||||||||
Contributions of equity-based compensation from Anadarko | — | 5,741 | — | — | 5,741 | |||||||||||||||
Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko | 97,755 | — | — | — | 97,755 | |||||||||||||||
Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko of other assets | 58,835 | — | — | — | 58,835 | |||||||||||||||
Adjustments of net deferred tax liabilities | (1,514 | ) | — | — | — | (1,514 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other | — | 209 | — | 397 | 606 | |||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2018 | $ | 1,388,018 | $ | 951,888 | $ | — | $ | 2,552,777 | $ | 4,892,683 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 29,279 | 662,325 | 5,637 | 110,459 | 807,700 | |||||||||||||||
Cumulative impact of the Merger transactions (5) | — | 3,169,800 | — | (3,169,800 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of general partner units (5) | — | 19,861 | (19,861 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (1) | — | 7,407 | — | — | 7,407 | |||||||||||||||
WES Operating equity transactions, net (2) | — | (755,197 | ) | — | 755,197 | — | ||||||||||||||
Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owner | — | — | — | (9,663 | ) | (9,663 | ) | |||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest owners of WES Operating | — | — | — | (118,225 | ) | (118,225 | ) | |||||||||||||
Distributions to Partnership unitholders | — | (969,073 | ) | — | — | (969,073 | ) | |||||||||||||
Acquisitions from affiliates (6) | (2,149,218 | ) | 112,872 | — | 28,845 | (2,007,501 | ) | |||||||||||||
Contributions of equity-based compensation from Occidental | — | 13,968 | — | — | 13,968 | |||||||||||||||
Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko | 458,819 | — | — | — | 458,819 | |||||||||||||||
Net contributions from (distributions to) Occidental of other assets | — | (90 | ) | — | — | (90 | ) | |||||||||||||
Adjustments of net deferred tax liabilities | 273,102 | (4,375 | ) | — | — | 268,727 | ||||||||||||||
Other | — | 561 | — | (20 | ) | 541 | ||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | — | $ | 3,209,947 | $ | (14,224 | ) | $ | 149,570 | $ | 3,345,293 |
(1) | See Note 6. |
(2) | For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, the $(755.2) million, $(19.6) million, and $6.6 million increase (decrease) to partners’ capital, respectively, together with net income (loss) attributable to Western Midstream Partners, LP, totaled $(58.0) million, $532.0 million, and $547.4 million, respectively. |
(3) | See Note 3. |
(4) | Includes the adoption of Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) on January 1, 2018. See Note 1. |
(5) | See Note 1. |
(6) | The amounts allocated to common unitholders and noncontrolling interests represent a non-cash investing activity related to the assets and liabilities assumed in the AMA acquisition. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
128
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 807,700 | $ | 630,654 | $ | 737,385 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 483,255 | 389,164 | 318,771 | |||||||||
Impairments | 6,279 | 230,584 | 180,051 | |||||||||
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense | 15,494 | 6,431 | 5,169 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 7,609 | 139,048 | (53,138 | ) | ||||||||
Accretion and amortization of long-term obligations, net | 8,441 | 5,943 | 4,932 | |||||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates | (237,518 | ) | (195,469 | ) | (115,141 | ) | ||||||
Distributions from equity-investment earnings – affiliates | 234,572 | 187,392 | 117,093 | |||||||||
(Gain) loss on divestiture and other, net (1) | 1,406 | (1,312 | ) | (132,388 | ) | |||||||
(Gain) loss on interest-rate swaps | 125,334 | 7,972 | — | |||||||||
Cash paid to settle interest-rate swaps | (107,685 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Lower of cost or market inventory adjustments | 236 | 752 | 145 | |||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net | (45,033 | ) | (60,502 | ) | (16,244 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts and imbalance payables and accrued liabilities, net | (30,866 | ) | 45,605 | (937 | ) | |||||||
Change in other items, net | 54,876 | (38,087 | ) | (2,983 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,324,100 | 1,348,175 | 1,042,715 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (1,188,829 | ) | (1,948,595 | ) | (1,028,319 | ) | ||||||
Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates | — | — | 1,387 | |||||||||
Acquisitions from affiliates | (2,007,926 | ) | (254 | ) | (3,910 | ) | ||||||
Acquisitions from third parties | (93,303 | ) | (161,858 | ) | (177,798 | ) | ||||||
Investments in equity affiliates | (128,393 | ) | (133,629 | ) | (2,884 | ) | ||||||
Distributions from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings – affiliates | 30,256 | 29,585 | 31,659 | |||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of assets to third parties | 342 | 3,938 | 23,564 | |||||||||
Proceeds from property insurance claims | — | — | 22,977 | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (3,387,853 | ) | (2,210,813 | ) | (1,133,324 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||||||
Borrowings, net of debt issuance costs (2) | 4,169,695 | 2,671,337 | 468,803 | |||||||||
Repayments of debt (3) | (1,467,595 | ) | (1,040,000 | ) | — | |||||||
Settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (4) | — | — | (37,346 | ) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in outstanding checks | 1,571 | (3,206 | ) | 5,593 | ||||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of WES Operating common units, net of offering expenses | — | — | (183 | ) | ||||||||
Registration expenses related to the issuance of Partnership common units | (855 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Distributions to Partnership unitholders (5) | (969,073 | ) | (502,457 | ) | (441,967 | ) | ||||||
Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owner | (9,663 | ) | (13,529 | ) | (13,569 | ) | ||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest owners of WES Operating | (118,225 | ) | (386,326 | ) | (355,623 | ) | ||||||
Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko | 458,819 | 97,755 | 126,866 | |||||||||
Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (5) | 7,407 | 51,618 | 58,551 | |||||||||
Finance lease payments – affiliates | (508 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 2,071,573 | 875,192 | (188,875 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 7,820 | 12,554 | (279,484 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 92,142 | 79,588 | 359,072 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 99,962 | $ | 92,142 | $ | 79,588 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosures | ||||||||||||
Accretion expense and revisions to the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (4) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (4,094 | ) | |||||
Net distributions to (contributions from) Anadarko of other assets | 90 | (58,835 | ) | (3,189 | ) | |||||||
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest | 293,795 | 140,720 | 136,624 | |||||||||
Taxes paid (reimbursements received) | 96 | 2,408 | 1,194 | |||||||||
Accrued capital expenditures | 140,954 | 274,632 | 312,720 | |||||||||
Fair value of properties and equipment from non-cash third-party transactions (4) | — | — | 551,453 |
(1) | Includes losses related to an incident at the DBM complex for the year ended December 31, 2017. See Note 1. |
(2) | For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, includes $11.0 million and $321.8 million of borrowings, respectively, under the APCWH Note Payable. |
(3) | For the year ended December 31, 2019, includes a $439.6 million repayment to settle the APCWH Note Payable. See Note 6. |
(4) | See Note 3. |
(5) | See Note 6. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
129
WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors
Western Midstream Holdings, LLC (as general partner of Western Midstream Partners, LP):
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Western Midstream Operating, LP and subsidiaries (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, equity and partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership has changed its method of accounting for revenue recognition effective January 1, 2018, due to the adoption of Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC Topic 606).
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Partnership’s auditor since 2007.
Houston, Texas
February 27, 2020
130
WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands except per-unit amounts | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Revenues and other – affiliates | ||||||||||||
Service revenues – fee based | $ | 1,441,875 | $ | 1,070,066 | $ | 769,305 | ||||||
Service revenues – product based | 7,062 | 3,339 | — | |||||||||
Product sales | 158,459 | 280,306 | 753,724 | |||||||||
Other | — | — | 16,076 | |||||||||
Total revenues and other – affiliates | 1,607,396 | 1,353,711 | 1,539,105 | |||||||||
Revenues and other – third parties | ||||||||||||
Service revenues – fee based | 946,316 | 835,662 | 588,571 | |||||||||
Service revenues – product based | 63,065 | 85,446 | — | |||||||||
Product sales | 127,929 | 22,714 | 297,486 | |||||||||
Other | 1,468 | 2,125 | 4,452 | |||||||||
Total revenues and other – third parties | 1,138,778 | 945,947 | 890,509 | |||||||||
Total revenues and other | 2,746,174 | 2,299,658 | 2,429,614 | |||||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates | 237,518 | 195,469 | 115,141 | |||||||||
Operating expenses | ||||||||||||
Cost of product (1) | 444,247 | 415,505 | 953,792 | |||||||||
Operation and maintenance (1) | 641,219 | 480,861 | 345,617 | |||||||||
General and administrative (1) | 107,772 | 63,166 | 51,077 | |||||||||
Property and other taxes | 61,352 | 51,848 | 53,147 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 483,255 | 389,164 | 318,771 | |||||||||
Impairments | 6,279 | 230,584 | 180,051 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,744,124 | 1,631,128 | 1,902,455 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net (2) | (1,406 | ) | 1,312 | 132,388 | ||||||||
Proceeds from business interruption insurance claims | — | — | 29,882 | |||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 1,238,162 | 865,311 | 804,570 | |||||||||
Interest income – affiliates | 16,900 | 16,900 | 16,900 | |||||||||
Interest expense (3) | (303,041 | ) | (181,796 | ) | (140,291 | ) | ||||||
Other income (expense), net (4) | (123,864 | ) | (4,955 | ) | 1,299 | |||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 828,157 | 695,460 | 682,478 | |||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 13,472 | 58,934 | (59,923 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | 814,685 | 636,526 | 742,401 | |||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | 7,095 | 8,609 | 10,735 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Midstream Operating, LP | $ | 807,590 | $ | 627,917 | $ | 731,666 | ||||||
Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss): | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Midstream Operating, LP | $ | 807,590 | $ | 627,917 | $ | 731,666 | ||||||
Pre-acquisition net (income) loss allocated to Anadarko | (29,279 | ) | (182,142 | ) | (164,183 | ) | ||||||
Series A Preferred units interest in net (income) loss (5) | — | — | (42,373 | ) | ||||||||
General partner interest in net (income) loss (5) | — | (346,538 | ) | (303,835 | ) | |||||||
Common and Class C limited partners’ interest in net income (loss) (5) | 778,311 | 99,237 | 221,275 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) per common unit – basic and diluted (5) | N/A | $ | 0.55 | $ | 1.30 |
(1) | Cost of product includes product purchases from affiliates (as defined in Note 1) of $254.8 million, $168.5 million, and $74.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Operation and maintenance includes charges from affiliates of $147.0 million, $115.9 million, and $82.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. General and administrative includes charges from affiliates of $99.6 million, $48.8 million, and $42.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. See Note 6. |
(2) | Includes losses related to an incident at the DBM complex for the year ended December 31, 2017. See Note 1. |
(3) | Includes affiliate amounts of $(2.0) million, $(6.7) million, and $(0.2) million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. See Note 1 and Note 13. |
(4) | Includes losses associated with the interest-rate swap agreements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. See Note 13. |
(5) | See Note 5 for the calculation of net income (loss) per common unit. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
131
WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, | ||||||||
thousands except number of units | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 98,122 | $ | 90,448 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net (1) | 260,748 | 221,373 | ||||||
Other current assets (2) | 39,914 | 30,583 | ||||||
Total current assets | 398,784 | 342,404 | ||||||
Note receivable – Anadarko | 260,000 | 260,000 | ||||||
Property, plant, and equipment | ||||||||
Cost | 12,355,671 | 11,258,773 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | 3,290,740 | 2,848,420 | ||||||
Net property, plant, and equipment | 9,064,931 | 8,410,353 | ||||||
Goodwill | 445,800 | 445,800 | ||||||
Other intangible assets | 809,391 | 841,408 | ||||||
Equity investments | 1,285,717 | 1,092,088 | ||||||
Other assets (3) | 78,202 | 62,792 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 12,342,825 | $ | 11,454,845 | ||||
LIABILITIES, EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts and imbalance payables | $ | 293,128 | $ | 443,343 | ||||
Short-term debt (4) | 7,873 | — | ||||||
Accrued ad valorem taxes | 35,160 | 36,986 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities (5) | 149,639 | 127,874 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 485,800 | 608,203 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities | ||||||||
Long-term debt | 7,951,565 | 4,787,381 | ||||||
APCWH Note Payable (6) | — | 427,493 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 18,899 | 280,017 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations | 336,396 | 300,024 | ||||||
Other liabilities (7) | 208,346 | 132,130 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities | 8,515,206 | 5,927,045 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 9,001,006 | 6,535,248 | ||||||
Equity and partners’ capital | ||||||||
Common units (318,675,578 and 152,609,285 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) | 3,286,620 | 2,475,540 | ||||||
Class C units (zero and 14,372,665 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) (8) | — | 791,410 | ||||||
General partner units (zero and 2,583,068 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) (8) | — | 206,862 | ||||||
Net investment by Anadarko | — | 1,388,018 | ||||||
Total partners’ capital | 3,286,620 | 4,861,830 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest | 55,199 | 57,767 | ||||||
Total equity and partners’ capital | 3,341,819 | 4,919,597 | ||||||
Total liabilities, equity and partners’ capital | $ | 12,342,825 | $ | 11,454,845 |
(1) | Accounts receivable, net includes amounts receivable from affiliates (as defined in Note 1) of $113.6 million and $72.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
(2) | Other current assets includes affiliate amounts of $5.0 million and $3.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
(3) | Other assets includes affiliate amounts of $60.2 million and $42.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Other assets also includes $4.5 million and $5.3 million of NGLs line fill as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
(4) | As of December 31, 2019, all amounts are considered affiliate. See Note 14. |
(5) | Accrued liabilities includes affiliate amounts of $3.1 million and $2.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
(6) | See Note 1 and Note 6. |
(7) | Other liabilities includes affiliate amounts of $97.8 million and $47.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
(8) | Immediately prior to the closing of the Merger (as defined in Note 1), all outstanding general partner units converted into a non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating and WES Operating common units and all outstanding Class C units converted into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
132
WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Partners’ Capital | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands | Net Investment by Anadarko | Common Units | Class C Units | Series A Preferred Units | General Partner Units | Noncontrolling Interest | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 761,890 | $ | 2,536,872 | $ | 750,831 | $ | 639,545 | $ | 143,968 | $ | 64,563 | $ | 4,897,669 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 164,183 | 231,405 | 24,790 | 7,453 | 303,835 | 10,735 | 742,401 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (1) | — | 58,551 | — | — | — | — | 58,551 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of Series A Preferred units into common units (2) | — | 686,936 | — | (686,936 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature of Class C units and Series A Preferred units | — | (66,718 | ) | 4,419 | 62,299 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owner | — | — | — | — | — | (13,569 | ) | (13,569 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to WES Operating unitholders | — | (510,228 | ) | — | (22,361 | ) | (268,711 | ) | — | (801,300 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions from affiliates | (1,263 | ) | 1,263 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revision to Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (3) | — | 4,165 | — | — | — | — | 4,165 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Contributions of equity-based compensation from Anadarko | — | 4,473 | — | — | 90 | — | 4,563 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko | 126,866 | — | — | — | — | — | 126,866 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko of other assets | — | 3,139 | — | — | 50 | — | 3,189 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments of net deferred tax liabilities | (1,505 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (1,505 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other | — | 152 | — | — | — | — | 152 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 | $ | 1,050,171 | $ | 2,950,010 | $ | 780,040 | $ | — | $ | 179,232 | $ | 61,729 | $ | 5,021,182 | ||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change (4) | 629 | (41,108 | ) | (3,533 | ) | — | (696 | ) | 958 | (43,750 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 182,142 | 87,581 | 11,656 | — | 346,538 | 8,609 | 636,526 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (1) | — | 51,618 | — | — | — | — | 51,618 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature of Class C units | — | (3,247 | ) | 3,247 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owner | — | — | — | — | — | (13,529 | ) | (13,529 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to WES Operating unitholders | — | (575,323 | ) | — | — | (318,326 | ) | — | (893,649 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Contributions of equity-based compensation from Anadarko | — | 5,613 | — | — | 114 | — | 5,727 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko | 97,755 | — | — | — | — | — | 97,755 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko of other assets | 58,835 | — | — | — | — | — | 58,835 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments of net deferred tax liabilities | (1,514 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (1,514 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other | — | 396 | — | — | — | — | 396 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2018 | $ | 1,388,018 | $ | 2,475,540 | $ | 791,410 | $ | — | $ | 206,862 | $ | 57,767 | $ | 4,919,597 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 29,279 | 765,678 | 10,636 | — | 1,997 | 7,095 | 814,685 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative impact of the Merger transactions (5) | — | 926,236 | (802,588 | ) | — | (123,648 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (1) | — | 7,407 | — | — | — | — | 7,407 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature of Class C units | — | (542 | ) | 542 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owner | — | — | — | — | — | (9,663 | ) | (9,663 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to WES Operating unitholders | — | (1,039,158 | ) | — | — | (85,230 | ) | — | (1,124,388 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions from affiliates (6) | (2,149,218 | ) | 141,717 | — | — | — | — | (2,007,501 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Contributions of equity-based compensation from Occidental | — | 13,938 | — | — | 19 | — | 13,957 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko | 458,819 | — | — | — | — | — | 458,819 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net contributions from (distributions to) Occidental of other assets | — | (90 | ) | — | — | — | — | (90 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments of net deferred tax liabilities | 273,102 | (4,375 | ) | — | — | — | — | 268,727 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other | — | 269 | — | — | — | — | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | — | $ | 3,286,620 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 55,199 | $ | 3,341,819 |
(1) | See Note 6. |
(2) | See Note 5. |
(3) | See Note 3. |
(4) | Includes the adoption of Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) on January 1, 2018. See Note 1. |
(5) | See Note 1. |
(6) | The amount allocated to common unitholders represents a non-cash investing activity related to the assets and liabilities assumed in the AMA acquisition. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
133
WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 814,685 | $ | 636,526 | $ | 742,401 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 483,255 | 389,164 | 318,771 | |||||||||
Impairments | 6,279 | 230,584 | 180,051 | |||||||||
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense | 14,235 | 6,153 | 4,922 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 7,609 | 139,048 | (53,138 | ) | ||||||||
Accretion and amortization of long-term obligations, net | 8,421 | 5,142 | 4,254 | |||||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates | (237,518 | ) | (195,469 | ) | (115,141 | ) | ||||||
Distributions from equity-investment earnings – affiliates | 234,572 | 187,392 | 117,093 | |||||||||
(Gain) loss on divestiture and other, net (1) | 1,406 | (1,312 | ) | (132,388 | ) | |||||||
(Gain) loss on interest-rate swaps | 125,334 | 7,972 | — | |||||||||
Cash paid to settle interest-rate swaps | (107,685 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Lower of cost or market inventory adjustments | 236 | 752 | 145 | |||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net | (44,939 | ) | (60,460 | ) | (16,177 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts and imbalance payables and accrued liabilities, net | (29,745 | ) | 44,424 | (947 | ) | |||||||
Change in other items, net | 56,044 | (37,802 | ) | (3,048 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,332,189 | 1,352,114 | 1,046,798 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (1,188,829 | ) | (1,948,595 | ) | (1,028,319 | ) | ||||||
Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates | — | — | 1,387 | |||||||||
Acquisitions from affiliates | (2,007,926 | ) | (254 | ) | (3,910 | ) | ||||||
Acquisitions from third parties | (93,303 | ) | (161,858 | ) | (177,798 | ) | ||||||
Investments in equity affiliates | (128,393 | ) | (133,629 | ) | (2,884 | ) | ||||||
Distributions from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings – affiliates | 30,256 | 29,585 | 31,659 | |||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of assets to third parties | 342 | 3,938 | 23,564 | |||||||||
Proceeds from property insurance claims | — | — | 22,977 | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (3,387,853 | ) | (2,210,813 | ) | (1,133,324 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||||||
Borrowings, net of debt issuance costs (2) | 4,169,695 | 2,671,344 | 468,803 | |||||||||
Repayments of debt (3) | (1,439,595 | ) | (1,040,000 | ) | — | |||||||
Settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (4) | — | — | (37,346 | ) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in outstanding checks | 1,571 | (3,206 | ) | 5,593 | ||||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of common units, net of offering expenses | — | — | (183 | ) | ||||||||
Distributions to WES Operating unitholders (5) | (1,124,388 | ) | (893,649 | ) | (801,300 | ) | ||||||
Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owner | (9,663 | ) | (13,529 | ) | (13,569 | ) | ||||||
Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko | 458,819 | 97,755 | 126,866 | |||||||||
Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko (5) | 7,407 | 51,618 | 58,551 | |||||||||
Finance lease payments – affiliates | (508 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 2,063,338 | 870,333 | (192,585 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 7,674 | 11,634 | (279,111 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 90,448 | 78,814 | 357,925 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 98,122 | $ | 90,448 | $ | 78,814 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosures | ||||||||||||
Accretion expense and revisions to the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (4) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (4,094 | ) | |||||
Net distributions to (contributions from) Anadarko of other assets | 90 | (58,835 | ) | (3,189 | ) | |||||||
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest | 293,561 | 139,482 | 135,079 | |||||||||
Taxes paid (reimbursements received) | 96 | 2,408 | 1,194 | |||||||||
Accrued capital expenditures | 140,954 | 274,632 | 312,720 | |||||||||
Fair value of properties and equipment from non-cash third-party transactions (4) | — | — | 551,453 |
(1) | Includes losses related to an incident at the DBM complex for the year ended December 31, 2017. See Note 1. |
(2) | For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, includes $11.0 million and $321.8 million of borrowings, respectively, under the APCWH Note Payable. |
(3) | For the year ended December 31, 2019, includes a $439.6 million repayment to settle the APCWH Note Payable. See Note 6. |
(4) | See Note 3. |
(5) | See Note 6. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
134
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General. Western Midstream Partners, LP (formerly Western Gas Equity Partners, LP) is a Delaware master limited partnership formed in September 2012. Western Midstream Operating, LP (formerly Western Gas Partners, LP, and together with its subsidiaries, “WES Operating”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed by Anadarko Petroleum Corporation in 2007 to acquire, own, develop, and operate midstream assets. Western Midstream Partners, LP owns, directly and indirectly, a 98.0% limited partner interest in WES Operating, and directly owns all of the outstanding equity interests of Western Midstream Operating GP, LLC, which holds the entire non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating. “Anadarko” refers to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries, excluding Western Midstream Holdings, LLC. Anadarko became a wholly owned subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation as a result of Occidental Petroleum Corporation’s acquisition by merger of Anadarko on August 8, 2019.
For purposes of these consolidated financial statements, the “Partnership” refers to Western Midstream Partners, LP in its individual capacity or to Western Midstream Partners, LP and its subsidiaries, including Western Midstream Operating GP, LLC and WES Operating, as the context requires. “WES Operating GP” refers to Western Midstream Operating GP, LLC, individually as the general partner of WES Operating. The Partnership’s general partner, Western Midstream Holdings, LLC (the “general partner”), is a wholly owned subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation. “Occidental” refers to Occidental Petroleum Corporation, as the context requires, and its subsidiaries, excluding the general partner. “Affiliates” refers to Occidental and the Partnership’s equity interests in Fort Union Gas Gathering, LLC (“Fort Union”), White Cliffs Pipeline, LLC (“White Cliffs”), Rendezvous Gas Services, LLC (“Rendezvous”), Enterprise EF78 LLC (the “Mont Belvieu JV”), Texas Express Pipeline LLC (“TEP”), Texas Express Gathering LLC (“TEG”), Front Range Pipeline LLC (“FRP”), Whitethorn Pipeline Company LLC (“Whitethorn LLC”), Cactus II Pipeline LLC (“Cactus II”), Saddlehorn Pipeline Company, LLC (“Saddlehorn”), Panola Pipeline Company, LLC (“Panola”), Mi Vida JV LLC (“Mi Vida”), Ranch Westex JV LLC (“Ranch Westex”), and Red Bluff Express Pipeline, LLC (“Red Bluff Express”). See Note 3. The interests in TEP, TEG, and FRP are referred to collectively as the “TEFR Interests.” “MGR assets” refers to the Red Desert complex and the Granger straddle plant. The “West Texas complex” refers to the Delaware Basin Midstream, LLC (“DBM”) complex and DBJV and Haley systems.
The Partnership is engaged in the business of gathering, compressing, treating, processing, and transporting natural gas; gathering, stabilizing, and transporting condensate, natural-gas liquids (“NGLs”), and crude oil; and gathering and disposing of produced water. In its capacity as a natural-gas processor, the Partnership also buys and sells natural gas, NGLs, and condensate on behalf of itself and as an agent for its customers under certain contracts. The Partnership provides the above-described midstream services for Occidental and third-party customers. As of December 31, 2019, the Partnership’s assets and investments consisted of the following:
Wholly Owned and Operated | Operated Interests | Non-Operated Interests | Equity Interests | |||||||||
Gathering systems (1) | 17 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||
Treating facilities | 37 | 3 | — | 3 | ||||||||
Natural-gas processing plants/trains | 25 | 3 | — | 5 | ||||||||
NGLs pipelines | 2 | — | — | 4 | ||||||||
Natural-gas pipelines | 5 | — | — | 1 | ||||||||
Crude-oil pipelines | 3 | 1 | — | 3 |
(1) | Includes the DBM water systems. |
These assets and investments are located in the Rocky Mountains (Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming), North-central Pennsylvania, Texas, and New Mexico. Latham Train I, a processing train that is part of the DJ Basin complex, commenced operations in the fourth quarter of 2019.
135
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
December 2019 Agreements. On December 31, 2019, (i) the Partnership and certain of its subsidiaries, including WES Operating and WES Operating GP, entered into the below-described agreements with Occidental and/or certain of its subsidiaries, including Anadarko, and (ii) WES Operating also entered into the below-described amendments to its debt agreements (collectively referred to as the “December 2019 Agreements”).
• | Exchange Agreement. Western Gas Resources, Inc. (“WGRI”), the general partner, and the Partnership entered into a partnership interests exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), pursuant to which the Partnership canceled the non-economic general partner interest in the Partnership and simultaneously issued a 2.0% general partner interest to the general partner in exchange for which WGRI transferred 9,060,641 common units to the Partnership, which immediately canceled such units on receipt. |
• | Services, Secondment, and Employee Transfer Agreement. Occidental, Anadarko, and WES Operating GP entered into an amended and restated Services, Secondment, and Employee Transfer Agreement (the “Services Agreement”), pursuant to which Occidental, Anadarko, and their subsidiaries will (i) second certain personnel employed by Occidental to WES Operating GP, in exchange for which WES Operating GP will pay a monthly secondment and shared services fee to Occidental equivalent to the direct cost of the seconded employees and (ii) continue to provide certain administrative and operational services to the Partnership for up to a two-year transition period. The Services Agreement also includes provisions governing the transfer of certain employees to the Partnership and the assumption by the Partnership of liabilities relating to those employees at the time of their transfer. In January 2020, pursuant to the Services Agreement, Occidental made a one-time cash contribution of $20.0 million to the Partnership for anticipated transition costs required to establish stand-alone human resources and information technology functions. |
• | RCF amendment. WES Operating entered into an amendment to its $2.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“RCF”) to, among other things, (i) effective on February 14, 2020, exercise the final one-year extension option to extend the maturity date of the RCF to February 14, 2025, for the extending lenders, and (ii) modify the change of control definition to provide, among other things, that, subject to certain conditions, if the limited partners of the Partnership elect to remove the general partner as the general partner of the Partnership in accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement, then such removal will not constitute a change of control under the RCF. |
• | Term loan facility amendment. WES Operating entered into an amendment of its $3.0 billion senior unsecured credit facility (“Term loan facility”) to, among other things, modify the change of control definition to provide, among other things, that, subject to certain conditions, if the limited partners of the Partnership elect to remove the general partner as the general partner of the Partnership in accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement, then such removal will not constitute a change of control under the Term loan facility. |
• | Termination of debt-indemnification agreements. WES Operating GP and certain wholly owned subsidiaries of Occidental mutually terminated the debt-indemnification agreements related to indebtedness incurred by WES Operating. |
• | Termination of omnibus agreements. The Partnership and WES Operating entered into agreements with Occidental to terminate the WES and WES Operating omnibus agreements. See Note 6. |
136
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Merger transactions. On February 28, 2019, the Partnership, WES Operating, Anadarko, and certain of their affiliates completed the transactions contemplated by the Contribution Agreement and Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) dated November 7, 2018, pursuant to which, among other things, Clarity Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, merged with and into WES Operating, with WES Operating continuing as the surviving entity and as a subsidiary of the Partnership (the “Merger”). In connection with the Merger closing, (i) the common units of WES Operating, which previously traded under the symbol “WES,” ceased to trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), (ii) the common units of the Partnership, which previously traded under the symbol “WGP,” began to trade on the NYSE under the symbol “WES,” (iii) the Partnership changed its name from Western Gas Equity Partners, LP to Western Midstream Partners, LP, and (iv) WES Operating changed its name from Western Gas Partners, LP to Western Midstream Operating, LP.
The Merger Agreement also provided that the Partnership, WES Operating, and Anadarko cause their respective affiliates to execute the following transactions, among others, immediately prior to the Merger becoming effective in the following order: (1) Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC and WGR Asset Holding Company LLC (“WGRAH”) (the “Contributing Parties”) contribute to WES Operating, and WES Operating subsequently contributes to WGR Operating, LP, Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC, and DBM (each wholly owned by WES Operating), all of their interests in each of Anadarko Wattenberg Oil Complex LLC, Anadarko DJ Oil Pipeline LLC, Anadarko DJ Gas Processing LLC, Wamsutter Pipeline LLC, DBM Oil Services, LLC, Anadarko Pecos Midstream LLC, Anadarko Mi Vida LLC, and APC Water Holdings 1, LLC (“APCWH”) in exchange for aggregate consideration of $1.814 billion of cash, less the outstanding amount payable pursuant to an intercompany note (the “APCWH Note Payable”) assumed by WES Operating in connection with the transfer, and 45,760,201 WES Operating common units; (2) APC Midstream Holdings, LLC (“AMH”) transfers its interests in Saddlehorn and Panola to WES Operating in exchange for $193.9 million of cash; (3) WES Operating contributes cash in an amount equal to the outstanding balance of the APCWH Note Payable immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger to APCWH, which in turn uses the contributed cash to satisfy the APCWH Note Payable to Anadarko; (4) the WES Operating Class C units convert into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis; and (5) WES Operating and WES Operating GP convert the incentive distribution rights (“IDRs”) and the 2,583,068 general partner units in WES Operating held by WES Operating GP into a non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating and 105,624,704 WES Operating common units. The 45,760,201 WES Operating common units issued to the Contributing Parties, less 6,375,284 WES Operating common units retained by WGRAH, convert into the right to receive an aggregate of 55,360,984 common units of the Partnership at Merger completion. Each WES Operating common unit issued and outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the Merger (other than WES Operating common units owned by the Partnership and WES Operating GP, and certain common units held by subsidiaries of Anadarko) converts into the right to receive 1.525 common units of the Partnership. See Note 13 for additional information.
137
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Basis of presentation. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and entities in which it holds a controlling financial interest, including WES Operating and WES Operating GP. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
The following table outlines the ownership interests and the accounting method of consolidation used in the consolidated financial statements for entities not wholly owned:
Percentage Interest | |||
Full consolidation | |||
Chipeta (1) | 75.00 | % | |
Proportionate consolidation (2) | |||
Springfield system | 50.10 | % | |
Marcellus Interest systems | 33.75 | % | |
Equity investments (3) | |||
Mi Vida | 50.00 | % | |
Ranch Westex | 50.00 | % | |
FRP | 33.33 | % | |
Red Bluff Express | 30.00 | % | |
Mont Belvieu JV | 25.00 | % | |
Rendezvous | 22.00 | % | |
TEP | 20.00 | % | |
TEG | 20.00 | % | |
Whitethorn LLC | 20.00 | % | |
Saddlehorn | 20.00 | % | |
Cactus II | 15.00 | % | |
Panola | 15.00 | % | |
Fort Union | 14.81 | % | |
White Cliffs | 10.00 | % |
(1) | The 25% third-party interest in Chipeta Processing LLC (“Chipeta”) is reflected within noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements, in addition to the noncontrolling interests noted below. |
(2) | The Partnership proportionately consolidates its associated share of the assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses attributable to these assets. |
(3) | Investments in non-controlled entities over which the Partnership exercises significant influence are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. “Equity-investment throughput” refers to the Partnership’s share of average throughput for these investments. |
The consolidated financial results of WES Operating are included in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements. Throughout these notes to consolidated financial statements, and to the extent material, any differences between the consolidated financial results of the Partnership and WES Operating are discussed separately. The Partnership’s consolidated financial statements differ from those of WES Operating primarily as a result of (i) the presentation of noncontrolling interest ownership (see Noncontrolling interests below and Note 5), (ii) the elimination of WES Operating GP’s investment in WES Operating with WES Operating GP’s underlying capital account, (iii) the general and administrative expenses incurred by the Partnership, which are separate from, and in addition to, those incurred by WES Operating, (iv) the inclusion of the impact of Partnership equity balances and Partnership distributions, and (v) the senior secured revolving credit facility (“WGP RCF”) until its repayment in March 2019. See Note 13.
138
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Presentation of the Partnership’s assets. The Partnership’s assets include assets owned and ownership interests accounted for by the Partnership under the equity method of accounting, through its 98.0% partnership interest in WES Operating, as of December 31, 2019 (see Note 10). The Partnership also owns and controls the entire non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating GP, and the Partnership’s general partner is owned by Occidental; therefore, the Partnership’s prior asset acquisitions from Anadarko were classified as transfers of net assets between entities under common control. As such, assets acquired from Anadarko initially were recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value, which did not equate to the total acquisition price paid by the Partnership. Further, subsequent to asset acquisitions from Anadarko, the Partnership was required to recast its financial statements to include the activities of acquired assets from the date of common control.
For reporting periods that required recast, the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the acquisition of assets from Anadarko were prepared from Anadarko’s historical cost-basis accounts and may not be necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if the Partnership had owned the assets during the periods reported. Net income (loss) attributable to the assets acquired from Anadarko for periods prior to the Partnership’s acquisition of such assets was not allocated to the limited partners.
Use of estimates. In preparing financial statements in accordance with GAAP, management makes informed judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Management evaluates its estimates and related assumptions regularly, using historical experience and other reasonable methods. Changes in facts and circumstances or additional information may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from these estimates. Effects on the business, financial condition, and results of operations resulting from revisions to estimates are recognized when the facts that give rise to the revisions become known. The information included herein reflects all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements, and certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation.
Noncontrolling interests. For periods subsequent to Merger completion, the Partnership’s noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements consist of (i) the 25% third-party interest in Chipeta and (ii) the 2.0% Occidental subsidiary-owned limited partner interest in WES Operating. For periods prior to Merger completion, the Partnership’s noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements consisted of (i) the 25% third-party interest in Chipeta, (ii) the publicly held limited partner interests in WES Operating, (iii) the common units issued by WES Operating to subsidiaries of Anadarko as part of the consideration paid for prior acquisitions from Anadarko, (iv) the Class C units issued by WES Operating to a subsidiary of Anadarko as part of the funding for the acquisition of DBM, and (v) the WES Operating Series A Preferred units issued to private investors as part of the funding of the Springfield acquisition, until converted into WES Operating common units in 2017. For all periods presented, WES Operating’s noncontrolling interest in the consolidated financial statements consisted of the 25% third-party interest in Chipeta. See Note 5.
When WES Operating issues equity, the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest reported by the Partnership is adjusted to reflect the noncontrolling ownership interest in WES Operating. The resulting impact of such noncontrolling interest adjustment on the Partnership’s interest in WES Operating is reflected as an adjustment to the Partnership’s partners’ capital.
Shutdown of gathering systems. In May 2018, after assessing a number of factors, and with safety and protection of the environment as the primary focus, the Partnership decided to permanently cease operations at the Kitty Draw gathering system in Wyoming (part of the Hilight system) and the Third Creek gathering system in Colorado (part of the DJ Basin complex). Results for the year ended December 31, 2018, reflect (i) an accrual of $10.9 million in anticipated costs associated with the system shutdowns, recorded as a reduction in affiliate Product sales in the consolidated statements of operations, and (ii) impairment expense of $134.0 million associated with reducing the net book value of the gathering systems and recording an additional asset retirement obligation. During the year ended December 31, 2019, $6.1 million of the accrual related to the Kitty Draw gathering system shutdown was reversed due to producer settlements being less than initial estimates.
139
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Fair value. The fair-value-measurement standard defines fair value as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard characterizes inputs used in determining fair value according to a hierarchy that prioritizes those inputs based on the degree to which the inputs are observable. The three input levels of the fair-value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 – Inputs represent unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (for example, quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets not considered to be active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or market-corroborated inputs).
Level 3 – Inputs that are not observable from objective sources, such as management’s internally developed assumptions used in pricing an asset or liability (for example, an estimate of future cash flows used in management’s internally developed present value of future cash flows model that underlies the fair value measurement).
In determining fair value, management uses observable market data when available, or models that incorporate observable market data. When a fair value measurement is required and there is not a market-observable price for the asset or liability or a market-observable price for a similar asset or liability, the cost, income, or multiples approach is used, depending on the quality of information available to support management’s assumptions. The cost approach is based on management’s best estimate of the current asset replacement cost. The income approach uses management’s best assumptions regarding expectations of projected cash flows and discounts the expected cash flows using a commensurate risk-adjusted discount rate. Such evaluations involve significant judgment because results are based on expected future events or conditions, such as sales prices, estimates of future throughput, capital and operating costs and the timing thereof, economic and regulatory climates, and other factors. A multiples approach uses management’s best assumptions regarding expectations of projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”) and an assumed multiple of that EBITDA that a willing buyer would pay to acquire an asset. Management’s estimates of future net cash flows and EBITDA are inherently imprecise because they reflect management’s expectation of future conditions that are often outside of management’s control. However, the assumptions used reflect a market participant’s view of long-term prices, costs, and other factors, and are consistent with assumptions used in the Partnership’s business plans and investment decisions.
Management uses relevant observable inputs available for the valuation technique employed to estimate fair value. If a fair-value measurement reflects inputs at multiple levels within the hierarchy, the fair-value measurement is characterized based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair-value measurement. Non-financial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value include certain assets and liabilities acquired in a third-party business combination, assets and liabilities exchanged in non-monetary transactions, goodwill and other intangibles, initial recognition of asset retirement obligations, and initial recognition of environmental obligations assumed in a third-party acquisition. Impairment analyses for long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangibles, and the initial recognition of asset retirement obligations and environmental obligations use Level-3 inputs.
The fair value of debt reflects any premium or discount for the difference between the stated interest rate and the quarter-end market interest rate, and is based on quoted market prices for identical instruments, if available, or based on valuations of similar debt instruments. See Note 13.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable reported on the consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items.
Cash equivalents. All highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered cash equivalents.
140
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Allowance for uncollectible accounts. Exposure to bad debts is analyzed on a customer-by-customer basis for affiliate and third-party accounts receivable and the Partnership may establish credit limits for significant affiliate and third-party customers. The allowance for uncollectible accounts was immaterial at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Imbalances. The consolidated balance sheets include imbalance receivables and payables resulting from differences in volumes received into the Partnership’s systems and volumes delivered by the Partnership to customers. Volumes owed to or by the Partnership that are subject to monthly cash settlement are valued according to the terms of the contract as of the balance sheet dates and reflect market index prices. Other volumes owed to or by the Partnership are valued at the Partnership’s weighted-average cost as of the balance sheet dates and are settled in-kind. As of December 31, 2019, imbalance receivables and payables were $4.7 million and $2.7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, imbalance receivables and payables were $9.0 million and $9.6 million, respectively. Net changes in imbalance receivables and payables are reported in Cost of product in the consolidated statements of operations.
Inventory. The cost of NGLs inventories is determined by the weighted-average cost method on a location-by-location basis. Inventory is stated at the lower of weighted-average cost or net realizable value. NGLs line-fill inventory and NGLs inventory are reported in Other assets and Other current assets, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 11.
Property, plant, and equipment. Property, plant, and equipment generally is stated at the lower of historical cost less accumulated depreciation or fair value if impaired. Because prior acquisitions of assets from Anadarko were transfers of net assets between entities under common control, the assets acquired initially were recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value. The difference between the carrying value of net assets acquired from Anadarko and the consideration paid has been recorded as an adjustment to partners’ capital.
Assets acquired in a business combination or non-monetary exchange with a third party are initially recorded at fair value. All construction-related direct labor and material costs are capitalized. The cost of renewals and betterments that extend the useful life of property, plant, and equipment is also capitalized. The cost of repairs, replacements, and major maintenance projects that do not extend the useful life or increase the expected output of property, plant, and equipment is expensed as incurred.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives and salvage values of assets. However, subsequent events could cause a change in estimates, thereby impacting future depreciation amounts. Uncertainties that may impact these estimates include, but are not limited to, changes in laws and regulations relating to environmental matters, including air and water quality, restoration and abandonment requirements, economic conditions, and supply and demand in the area.
Management evaluates the ability to recover the carrying amount of its long-lived assets to determine whether its long-lived assets have been impaired. Impairments exist when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds estimates of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. When alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset are under consideration, estimates of future undiscounted cash flows take into account possible outcomes and probabilities of their occurrence. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable based on the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the impairment loss is measured as the excess of the asset’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value, such that the asset’s carrying amount is adjusted to its estimated fair value with an offsetting charge to impairment expense. Refer to Note 8 for a description of impairments recorded during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.
141
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Insurance recoveries. Involuntary conversions result from the loss of an asset because of unforeseen events (e.g., destruction due to fire). Some of these events are insurable and result in property damage insurance recovery. Amounts that are received from insurance carriers are net of any deductibles related to the covered event. A receivable is recorded from insurance to the extent a loss is recognized from an involuntary conversion event and the likelihood of recovering such loss is deemed probable. To the extent that any insurance claim receivables are later judged not probable of recovery (e.g., due to new information), such amounts are expensed. A gain on involuntary conversion is recognized when the amount received from insurance exceeds the net book value of the retired asset(s). In addition, gains related to insurance recoveries are not recognized until all contingencies related to such proceeds have been resolved; that is, a cash payment is received from the insurance carrier or there is a binding settlement agreement with the carrier that clearly states that a payment will be made. To the extent that an asset is rebuilt, the associated expenditures are capitalized, as appropriate, on the consolidated balance sheets and presented as Capital expenditures in the consolidated statements of cash flows. With respect to business interruption insurance claims, income is recognized only when cash proceeds are received from insurers, which are presented in the consolidated statements of operations as a component of Operating income (loss).
In December 2015, there was an initial fire and secondary explosion at the processing facility within the DBM complex. The majority of the damage from the incident was to the liquid-handling facilities and the amine-treating units at the inlet of the complex. During the year ended December 31, 2017, a $5.7 million loss was recorded in Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations, related to a change in the Partnership’s estimate of the amount that would be recovered under the property insurance claim based on continued discussions with insurers. During the second quarter of 2017, the Partnership reached a settlement with insurers and final proceeds were received. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership received $52.9 million in cash proceeds from insurers, including $29.9 million in proceeds from business interruption insurance claims and $23.0 million in proceeds from property insurance claims.
Capitalized interest. Interest is capitalized as part of the historical cost of constructing assets that are in progress. Capitalized interest is determined by multiplying the Partnership’s weighted-average borrowing cost on debt by the average amount of assets under construction. Once construction of an asset subject to interest capitalization is substantially complete, the associated capitalized interest is expensed through depreciation or impairment.
Goodwill. Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price of a business acquired exceeds the fair market value of the tangible and separately measurable intangible net assets. In addition, goodwill represents the allocated historic carrying value of midstream goodwill attributed to the Partnership’s assets previously acquired from Anadarko. The Partnership has allocated goodwill on its two reporting units: (i) gathering and processing and (ii) transportation. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually, as of October 1, or more often as facts and circumstances warrant. An initial qualitative assessment is performed to determine the likelihood of whether goodwill is impaired. If management concludes, based on qualitative factors, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, then no goodwill impairment is recorded and further testing is not necessary. If an assessment of qualitative factors does not result in management’s determination that the fair value of the reporting unit more likely than not exceeds its carrying amount, then a quantitative assessment must be performed. If the quantitative assessment indicates that the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds its fair value, a goodwill impairment is recorded for the amount by which the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value through a charge to impairment expense. See Note 9.
Other intangible assets. The Partnership assesses intangible assets, as described in Note 9, for impairment together with related underlying long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. See Property, plant, and equipment within this Note 1 for further discussion of management’s process to evaluate potential impairment of long-lived assets.
142
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Asset retirement obligations. A liability based on the estimated costs of retiring tangible long-lived assets is recognized as an asset retirement obligation in the period incurred. The liability is recognized at fair value, measured using discounted expected future cash outflows for the asset retirement obligation when the obligation originates, which generally is when an asset is acquired or constructed. The carrying amount of the associated asset is increased commensurate with the liability recognized. Over time, the discounted liability is adjusted to its expected settlement value through accretion expense, which is reported within Depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the liability is also adjusted for any changes in the expected value of the retirement obligation (with a corresponding adjustment to property, plant, and equipment) until the obligation is settled. Revisions in estimated asset retirement obligations may result from changes in estimated inflation rates, discount rates, asset retirement costs, and the estimated timing of settling asset retirement obligations. See Note 12.
Environmental expenditures. The Partnership expenses environmental obligations related to conditions caused by past operations that do not generate current or future revenues. Environmental obligations related to operations that generate current or future revenues are expensed or capitalized, as appropriate. Liabilities are recorded when the necessity for environmental remediation or other potential environmental liabilities becomes probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Accruals for estimated losses from environmental-remediation obligations are recognized no later than at the time of the completion of the remediation feasibility study. These accruals are adjusted as additional information becomes available or as circumstances change. Costs of future expenditures for environmental-remediation obligations are not discounted to their present value. See Note 15.
Segments. The Partnership’s operations continue to be organized into a single operating segment, the assets of which gather, compress, treat, process, and transport natural gas; gather, stabilize, and transport condensate, NGLs, and crude oil; and gather and dispose of produced water in the United States.
Revenue and cost of product. On January 1, 2018, the Partnership adopted Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“Topic 606”) and changed its accounting policy for revenue recognition as described below. The 2017 financial information was not adjusted and is reported under Revenue Recognition (Topic 605).
The Partnership provides gathering, processing, treating, transportation, and disposal services pursuant to a variety of contracts. Under these arrangements, the Partnership receives fees and/or retains a percentage of products or a percentage of the proceeds from the sale of the customer’s products. These revenues are included in Service revenues and Product sales in the consolidated statements of operations. Payment is generally received from the customer in the month following the service or delivery of the product. Contracts with customers generally have initial terms ranging from 5 to 10 years.
Service revenues – fee based is recognized for fee-based contracts in the month of service based on the volumes delivered by the customer. Producers’ wells or production facilities are connected to the Partnership’s gathering systems for gathering, processing, treating, transportation, and disposal of natural gas, NGLs, condensate, crude oil, and produced water, as applicable. Revenues are valued based on the rate in effect for the month of service when the fee is either the same per-unit rate over the contract term or when the fee escalates and the escalation factor approximates inflation. Deficiency fees charged to customers that do not meet their minimum delivery requirements are recognized as services are performed based on an estimate of the fees that will be billed at the completion of the performance period. Because of its significant upfront capital investment, the Partnership may charge additional service fees to customers for only a portion of the contract term (i.e., for the first year of a contract or until reaching a volume threshold), and these fees are recognized as revenue over the expected period of customer benefit, which is generally the life of the related properties. The Partnership also recognizes revenue and cost of product expense from marketing services performed on behalf of its customers by Occidental.
143
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
The Partnership also receives Service revenues – fee based from contracts that have minimum-volume commitment demand fees and fees that require periodic rate redeterminations based on the related facility cost of service. These fees include fixed and variable consideration that are recognized on a consistent per-unit rate over the term of the contract. Annual adjustments are made to the cost-of-service rates charged to customers, and a cumulative catch-up revenue adjustment related to services already provided to the minimum volumes under the contract may be recorded in future periods, with revenues for the remaining term of the contract recognized on a consistent per-unit rate. The cost-of-service rates are calculated using a contractually specified rate of return and estimates including long-term assumptions for capital invested, receipt volumes, and operating and maintenance expenses.
Service revenues – product based includes service revenues from percent-of-proceeds gathering and processing contracts that are recognized net of the cost of product for purchases from the Partnership’s customers since it is acting as the agent in the product sale. Keep-whole and percent-of-product agreements result in Service revenues – product based being recognized when the natural gas and/or NGLs are received from the customer as non-cash consideration for the services provided. Non-cash consideration for these services is valued at the time the services are provided. Revenue from product sales also is recognized, along with the cost of product expense related to the sale, when the product received as non-cash consideration is sold to either Occidental or a third party. When the product is sold to Occidental, Occidental is acting as the Partnership’s agent in the product sale, with the Partnership recognizing revenue and related cost of product expense associated with these marketing activities based on the Occidental sales price to the third party.
The Partnership also purchases natural-gas volumes from producers at the wellhead or from a production facility, typically at an index price, and charges the producer fees associated with the downstream gathering and processing services. When the fees relate to services performed after control of the product has transferred to the Partnership, the fees are treated as a reduction of the purchase cost. If the fees relate to services performed before control of the product has transferred to the Partnership, the fees are treated as Service revenues – fee based. Product sales revenue is recognized, along with cost of product expense related to the sale, when the purchased product is sold to either Occidental or a third party.
The Partnership receives aid-in-construction reimbursements for certain capital costs necessary to provide services to customers (i.e., connection costs, etc.) under certain service contracts. Aid-in-construction reimbursements are reflected as a contract liability as received and are amortized to Service revenues – fee based over the expected period of customer benefit, which is generally the life of the related properties.
Equity-based compensation. The general partner awards phantom units under the Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (assumed by the Partnership in connection with the Merger) and the Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan to its independent directors, executive officers, and Occidental employees performing services for the Partnership from time to time. As of December 31, 2019, the Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan had 3,419,020 and 2,911,985 units, respectively, available for future issuance. At vesting, each phantom unit under the Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan or the Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the holder will receive common units of the Partnership, or, at the discretion of the general partner’s Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors”), cash in an amount equal to the market value of the common units on the vesting date. Equity-based compensation expense attributable to grants made under the plans impacts cash flows from operating activities only to the extent cash payments are made to a participant in lieu of issuance of the common units to the participant. Equity-based compensation expense attributable to awards granted under the plans is amortized over the vesting periods applicable to the awards.
Additionally, general and administrative expense includes equity-based compensation expense allocated to the Partnership by Occidental for awards granted to the executive officers of the general partner and to other employees under (i) the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, (ii) Occidental’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and (iii) Occidental’s Phantom Share Unit Award Plan. Grants made under equity-based compensation plans result in equity-based compensation expense, which is determined by reference to the fair value of equity compensation. For equity-based awards ultimately settled through the issuance of units or stock, the fair value is measured as of the date of the relevant equity grant. Portions of these amounts are reflected as contributions to partners’ capital in the consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital. Any unrecognized compensation expense attributable to these plans is allocated to the Partnership over a weighted-average period applicable to the awards. See Note 6.
144
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Partnership income taxes. Deferred federal and state income taxes included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amount and tax basis of the Partnership’s investment in WES Operating. The Partnership’s accounting policy is to “look through” its investment in WES Operating for purposes of calculating deferred income tax asset and liability balances attributable to the Partnership’s interests in WES Operating. The application of such accounting policy resulted in no deferred income taxes being recognized for the book and tax basis difference in goodwill, which is non-deductible for tax purposes for all periods presented. The Partnership had no material uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2019 or 2018.
WES Operating income taxes. WES Operating generally is not subject to federal income tax or state income tax other than Texas margin tax on the portion of its income that is apportionable to Texas. Deferred state income taxes are recorded on temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. WES Operating routinely assesses the realizability of its deferred tax assets. If WES Operating concludes that it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, the tax asset is reduced by recording a valuation allowance.
With respect to assets previously acquired from Anadarko, WES Operating recorded Anadarko’s historic federal and state current and deferred income taxes for the periods prior to the acquisition of such assets. For periods on and subsequent to the acquisition, WES Operating is not subject to tax except for the Texas margin tax and, accordingly, does not record deferred federal income taxes related to the acquired assets.
For periods beginning on and subsequent to the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, WES Operating made payments to Anadarko pursuant to the tax sharing agreement for its estimated share of taxes from all forms of taxation, excluding income taxes imposed by the United States, that are included in any combined or consolidated returns filed by Occidental. The aggregate difference in the basis of WES Operating’s assets for financial and tax reporting purposes cannot be readily determined as WES Operating does not have access to information about each partner’s tax attributes in WES Operating.
The accounting standards for uncertain tax positions defines the criteria an individual tax position must satisfy for any part of the benefit of that position to be recognized in the financial statements. WES Operating had no material uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2019 or 2018.
Partnership’s net income (loss) per common unit. Subsequent to entering into the Exchange Agreement, the Partnership applies the two-class method in determining net income (loss) per unit applicable to master limited partnerships having multiple classes of securities, including common units and general partner units. The two-class method allocates earnings pursuant to a formula that treats participating securities as having rights to earnings that otherwise would have been available to common unitholders. Under the two-class method, net income (loss) per unit is calculated as if all of the earnings for the period were distributed pursuant to the terms of the relevant contractual arrangement. The accounting guidance provides the methodology for the allocation of undistributed earnings to the general partner and limited partners and the circumstances in which such an allocation should be made. For the Partnership, earnings per unit is calculated based on the assumption that the Partnership distributes to its unitholders an amount of cash equal to the net income of the Partnership, notwithstanding the general partner’s ultimate discretion over the amount of cash to be distributed for the period, the existence of other legal or contractual limitations that would prevent distributions of all of the net income for the period, or any other economic or practical limitation on the ability to make a full distribution of all of the net income for the period. See Note 5.
WES Operating’s net income (loss) per common unit. For periods subsequent to the closing of the Merger, net income (loss) per common unit for WES Operating is not calculated as it no longer has publicly traded units. For periods prior to the closing of the Merger, WES Operating applied the two-class method in determining net income (loss) per unit applicable to master limited partnerships having multiple classes of securities, including common units, Class C units, general partner units, and IDRs. See Note 5.
145
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Recently adopted accounting standards. ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) requires lessee recognition of a lease liability and a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset for all leases, including operating leases, with a term greater than 12 months on the balance sheet. This ASU modifies the definition of a lease and outlines the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leasing arrangements by lessees and lessors. The Partnership adopted this standard on January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective method applied to all leases in existence on January 1, 2019, and prior-period financial statements were not adjusted. The Partnership elected not to reassess contracts that commenced prior to adoption, to continue applying its current accounting policy for existing or expired land easements, and not to recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities for short-term leases.
Leases. The Partnership determines if an arrangement is a lease based on the rights and obligations conveyed at contract inception. Significant judgment is required when determining whether a customer obtains the right to direct the use of identified property or equipment.
When the Partnership is a lessee at the lease-commencement date, a lease is classified as either operating or finance, and ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of future lease payments over the lease term. As the rate implicit in the Partnership’s leases is generally not readily determinable, the Partnership discounts lease liabilities using the Partnership’s incremental borrowing rate at the commencement date. Non-lease components associated with leases that begin in 2019 or later are accounted for as part of the lease component, and prepaid lease payments are included as ROU assets. Options to extend or terminate a lease are included in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that the Partnership will exercise that option. Leases of 12 months or less are not recognized on the consolidated balance sheets. Lease cost is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For finance leases, interest expense is recognized over the lease term using the effective interest method. Variable lease payments are recognized when the obligation for those payments is incurred.
When the Partnership is a lessor at the lease-commencement date, a lease is classified as operating, sales-type, or direct financing. The underlying assets associated with these agreements are evaluated for future use beyond the lease term. For operating leases, lease income is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Variable lease payments are recognized when the obligation for those payments is performed. The Partnership does not have sales-type or direct financing leases.
2. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
The following table summarizes revenue from contracts with customers:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Revenue from customers | ||||||||
Service revenues – fee based | $ | 2,388,191 | $ | 1,905,728 | ||||
Service revenues – product based | 70,127 | 88,785 | ||||||
Product sales | 287,055 | 310,895 | ||||||
Total revenue from customers | 2,745,373 | 2,305,408 | ||||||
Revenue from other than customers | ||||||||
Net gains (losses) on commodity-price swap agreements | (667 | ) | (7,875 | ) | ||||
Other | 1,468 | 2,125 | ||||||
Total revenues and other | $ | 2,746,174 | $ | 2,299,658 |
146
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS (CONTINUED)
Contract balances. Receivables from customers, which are included in Accounts receivable, net on the consolidated balance sheets were $362.6 million and $214.3 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Contract assets primarily relate to accrued deficiency fees the Partnership expects to charge customers once the related performance periods are completed and revenue accrued but not yet billed under cost-of-service contracts with fixed and variable fees. The following table summarizes current-period activity related to contract assets from contracts with customers:
thousands | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2018 | $ | 47,621 | ||
Amounts transferred to Accounts receivable, net that were included in the contract assets balance at the beginning of the period | (4,841 | ) | ||
Additional estimated revenues recognized | 14,698 | |||
Cumulative catch-up adjustment for change in estimated consideration due to an annual cost-of-service rate update | 9,879 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | 67,357 | ||
Contract assets at December 31, 2019 | ||||
Other current assets | $ | 7,129 | ||
Other assets | 60,228 | |||
Total contract assets from contracts with customers | $ | 67,357 |
Contract liabilities primarily relate to (i) fees that are charged to customers for only a portion of the contract term and must be recognized as revenues over the expected period of customer benefit, (ii) fixed and variable fees under cost-of-service contracts that are received from customers for which revenue recognition is deferred, and (iii) aid-in-construction payments received from customers that must be recognized over the expected period of customer benefit. The following table summarizes current-period activity related to contract liabilities from contracts with customers:
thousands | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2018 | $ | 145,624 | ||
Cash received or receivable, excluding revenues recognized during the period | 75,166 | |||
Revenues recognized that were included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of the period | (12,110 | ) | ||
Cumulative catch-up adjustment for change in estimated consideration due to an annual cost-of-service rate update | 13,594 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | 222,274 | ||
Contract liabilities at December 31, 2019 | ||||
Accrued liabilities | $ | 19,659 | ||
Other liabilities | 202,615 | |||
Total contract liabilities from contracts with customers | $ | 222,274 |
147
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS (CONTINUED)
Transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations. Revenues expected to be recognized from certain performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) as of December 31, 2019, are presented in the following table. The Partnership applies the optional exemptions in Topic 606 and does not disclose consideration for remaining performance obligations with an original expected duration of one year or less or for variable consideration related to unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) performance obligations. Therefore, the following table represents only a portion of expected future revenues from existing contracts as most future revenues from customers are dependent on future variable customer volumes and, in some cases, variable commodity prices for those volumes.
thousands | ||||
2020 | $ | 736,055 | ||
2021 | 776,068 | |||
2022 | 1,030,527 | |||
2023 | 973,799 | |||
2024 | 943,514 | |||
Thereafter | 3,534,725 | |||
Total | $ | 7,994,688 |
3. ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
AMA acquisition. In February 2019, WES Operating acquired the following assets from Anadarko (see Note 1), which collectively are referred to as the Anadarko Midstream Assets (“AMA”):
• | Wattenberg processing plant. The Wattenberg processing plant consists of a cryogenic train (with capacity of 190 million cubic feet per day (“MMcf/d”)) and a refrigeration train (with capacity of 80 MMcf/d) located in Adams County, Colorado, now part of the DJ Basin complex. |
• | Wamsutter pipeline. The Wamsutter pipeline is a crude-oil gathering pipeline located in Sweetwater County, Wyoming and delivers crude oil into MPLX LP’s SLC Core Pipeline System (formerly referred to as the Wamsutter Pipeline System). |
• | DJ Basin oil system. The DJ Basin oil system consists of (i) a crude-oil gathering system, (ii) a centralized oil stabilization facility (“COSF”), and (iii) a 12-mile crude-oil pipeline, located in Weld County, Colorado. The COSF consists of Trains I through VI with total capacity of 155 thousand barrels per day (“MBbls/d”) and two storage tanks with total capacity of 500,000 barrels. Train VI commenced operations in 2018. The pipeline connects the COSF to Tampa Rail. |
• | DBM oil system. The DBM oil system consists of (i) a crude-oil gathering system, (ii) three central production facilities (“CPFs”), which include ten processing trains with total capacity of 75 MBbls/d, (iii) three storage tanks with total capacity of 30,000 barrels, (iv) a 14-mile crude-oil pipeline, and (v) two regional oil treating facilities (“ROTFs”), which include four trains with total capacity of 120 MBbls/d, located in Reeves and Loving Counties, Texas. The ROTFs commenced operations in 2018. The pipeline transports crude oil from the DBM oil system and one third-party CPF into Plains All American Pipeline. |
• | APC water systems. The APC water systems consist of five produced-water disposal systems with total capacity of 565 MBbls/d, located in Reeves, Loving, and Ward Counties, Texas, which are now part of the DBM water systems. One produced-water disposal system commenced operations in 2017 and the other four commenced operations in 2018. |
148
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3. ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES (CONTINUED)
• | A 20% interest in Saddlehorn. Saddlehorn owns (i) a crude-oil and condensate pipeline (excluding pipeline capacity leased by Saddlehorn) that originates in Laramie County, Wyoming, and terminates in Cushing, Oklahoma, and (ii) four storage tanks with total capacity of 300,000 barrels. The Saddlehorn interest is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and the pipeline is operated by a third party. |
• | A 15% interest in Panola. Panola owns a 248-mile NGLs pipeline that originates in Panola County, Texas, and terminates in Mont Belvieu, Texas. The Panola interest is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and the pipeline is operated by a third party. |
• | A 50% interest in Mi Vida. Mi Vida owns a cryogenic gas processing plant (with capacity of 200 MMcf/d) located in Ward County, Texas. The interest in Mi Vida is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and the processing plant is operated by a third party. |
• | A 50% interest in Ranch Westex. Ranch Westex owns a processing plant consisting of a cryogenic train (with capacity of 100 MMcf/d) and a refrigeration train (with capacity of 25 MMcf/d), located in Ward County, Texas. The interest in Ranch Westex is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and the processing plant is operated by a third party. |
Red Bluff Express acquisition. In January 2019, the Partnership acquired a 30% interest in Red Bluff Express, which owns a natural-gas pipeline operated by a third party that connects processing plants in Reeves and Loving Counties, Texas, to the WAHA hub in Pecos County, Texas. The Partnership acquired its 30% interest from a third party via an initial net investment of $92.5 million, which represented its share of costs incurred up to the date of acquisition. The initial investment was funded with cash on hand and the interest in Red Bluff Express is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. See Note 10.
Whitethorn LLC acquisition. In June 2018, the Partnership acquired a 20% interest in Whitethorn LLC, which owns a crude-oil and condensate pipeline that originates in Midland, Texas, and terminates in Sealy, Texas (the “Midland-to-Sealy pipeline”) and related storage facilities (collectively referred to as “Whitethorn”). A third party operates Whitethorn and oversees the related commercial activities. In connection with its investment in Whitethorn LLC, the Partnership shares proportionally in the commercial activities. The Partnership acquired its 20% interest via a $150.6 million net investment, which was funded with cash on hand and is accounted for under the equity method. See Note 10.
Cactus II acquisition. In June 2018, the Partnership acquired a 15% interest in Cactus II, which owns a crude-oil pipeline operated by a third party (the “Cactus II pipeline”) connecting West Texas to the Corpus Christi area. The Cactus II pipeline began delivering crude oil during the third quarter of 2019 and is expected to become fully operational in the first quarter of 2020. The Partnership acquired its 15% interest from a third party via an initial net investment of $12.1 million, which represented its share of costs incurred up to the date of acquisition. The initial investment was funded with cash on hand and the interest in Cactus II is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. See Note 10.
Property exchange. In March 2017, the Partnership acquired an additional 50% interest in the Delaware Basin JV Gathering LLC (“DBJV”) system (the “Additional DBJV System Interest”) from a third party in exchange for (a) the Partnership’s 33.75% non-operated interest in two natural-gas gathering systems located in northern Pennsylvania (the “Non-Operated Marcellus Interest”), commonly referred to as the Liberty and Rome systems, and (b) $155.0 million of cash consideration (collectively, the “Property Exchange”). The Partnership previously held a 50% interest in, and operated, the DBJV system.
The Property Exchange was accounted for as a non-monetary transaction whereby the acquired Additional DBJV System Interest was recorded at the fair value of the divested Non-Operated Marcellus Interest plus the $155.0 million of cash consideration. The Property Exchange resulted in a net gain of $125.7 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations. Results of operations attributable to the Property Exchange were included in the consolidated statements of operations beginning on the acquisition date in the first quarter of 2017.
149
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3. ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES (CONTINUED)
DBJV acquisition - Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko. Prior to WES Operating’s agreement with Anadarko to settle the deferred purchase price obligation early, the consideration that would have been paid for the March 2015 acquisition of DBJV from Anadarko consisted of a cash payment to Anadarko due on March 31, 2020. In May 2017, WES Operating reached an agreement with Anadarko to settle this obligation with a cash payment to Anadarko of $37.3 million, which was equal to the estimated net present value of the obligation at March 31, 2017.
Newcastle system divestiture. In December 2018, the Newcastle system, located in Northeast Wyoming, was sold to a third party for $3.2 million, resulting in a net gain on sale of $0.6 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations. The Partnership previously held a 50% interest in, and operated, the Newcastle system.
Helper and Clawson systems divestiture. In June 2017, the Helper and Clawson systems, located in Utah, were sold to a third party, resulting in a net gain on sale of $16.3 million recorded as Gain (loss) on divestiture and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations.
4. PARTNERSHIP DISTRIBUTIONS
Partnership distributions. The partnership agreement requires the Partnership to distribute all of its available cash (as defined in its partnership agreement) to unitholders of record on the applicable record date within 55 days following each quarter’s end. The Board of Directors declared the following cash distributions to the Partnership’s unitholders for the periods presented:
thousands except per-unit amounts Quarters Ended | Total Quarterly Per-unit Distribution | Total Quarterly Cash Distribution | Distribution Date | ||||||||
2017 (1) | |||||||||||
March 31 | $ | 0.49125 | $ | 107,549 | May 2017 | ||||||
June 30 | 0.52750 | 115,487 | August 2017 | ||||||||
September 30 | 0.53750 | 117,677 | November 2017 | ||||||||
December 31 | 0.54875 | 120,140 | February 2018 | ||||||||
2018 (1) | |||||||||||
March 31 | $ | 0.56875 | $ | 124,518 | May 2018 | ||||||
June 30 | 0.58250 | 127,531 | August 2018 | ||||||||
September 30 | 0.59500 | 130,268 | November 2018 | ||||||||
December 31 | 0.60250 | 131,910 | February 2019 | ||||||||
2019 | |||||||||||
March 31 | $ | 0.61000 | $ | 276,324 | May 2019 | ||||||
June 30 | 0.61800 | 279,959 | August 2019 | ||||||||
September 30 | 0.62000 | 280,880 | November 2019 | ||||||||
December 31 (2) | 0.62200 | 281,786 | February 2020 |
(1) | The 2017 and 2018 distributions were declared and paid prior to the closing of the Merger. |
(2) | The Board of Directors declared a cash distribution to the Partnership’s unitholders for the fourth quarter of 2019 of $0.62200 per unit, or $281.8 million in aggregate. The cash distribution was paid on February 13, 2020, to unitholders of record at the close of business on January 31, 2020, including the general partner units that were issued on December 31, 2019 (see Note 1). |
Following the transactions contemplated by the Exchange Agreement, the general partner is entitled to 2.0% of all quarterly distributions beginning with the cash distribution declared for the fourth quarter of 2019.
150
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
4. PARTNERSHIP DISTRIBUTIONS (CONTINUED)
Available cash. The amount of available cash (as defined in the partnership agreement) generally is all cash on hand at the end of the quarter, plus, at the discretion of the general partner, working capital borrowings made subsequent to the end of such quarter, less the amount of cash reserves established by the general partner to provide for the proper conduct of the Partnership’s business, including reserves to fund future capital expenditures; to comply with applicable laws, debt instruments, or other agreements; or to provide funds for unitholder distributions for any one or more of the next four quarters. Working capital borrowings generally include borrowings made under a credit facility or similar financing arrangement. Working capital borrowings generally are intended to be repaid or refinanced within 12 months. In all cases, working capital borrowings are used solely for working capital purposes or to fund unitholder distributions.
WES Operating partnership distributions. For the below-presented periods, WES Operating paid the cash distributions to WES Operating’s common and general partner unitholders as follows:
thousands except per-unit amounts Quarters Ended | Total Quarterly Per-unit Distribution | Total Quarterly Cash Distribution | Distribution Date | ||||||||
2017 | |||||||||||
March 31 | $ | 0.875 | $ | 188,753 | May 2017 | ||||||
June 30 | 0.890 | 207,491 | August 2017 | ||||||||
September 30 | 0.905 | 212,038 | November 2017 | ||||||||
December 31 | 0.920 | 216,586 | February 2018 | ||||||||
2018 | |||||||||||
March 31 | $ | 0.935 | $ | 221,133 | May 2018 | ||||||
June 30 | 0.950 | 225,691 | August 2018 | ||||||||
September 30 | 0.965 | 230,239 | November 2018 | ||||||||
December 31 | 0.980 | 234,787 | February 2019 |
Immediately prior to the closing of the Merger, the WES Operating IDRs and general partner units were converted into WES Operating common units and a non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating, and at Merger completion, all WES Operating common units held by the public and subsidiaries of Anadarko (other than common units held by the Partnership, WES Operating GP, and 6.4 million common units held by a subsidiary of Anadarko) were converted into common units of the Partnership. Beginning first quarter of 2019, WES Operating makes cash distributions to the Partnership and WGRAH, a subsidiary of Occidental, in respect of their proportionate share of limited partner interests in WES Operating. For the quarters ended March 31, 2019, June 30, 2019, and September 30, 2019 WES Operating distributed $283.3 million, $288.1 million, and $289.7 million, respectively, to its limited partners. For the quarter ended December 31, 2019, WES Operating distributed $290.3 million to its limited partners. See Note 5.
WES Operating Class C unit distributions. Prior to the closing of the Merger, WES Operating’s Class C units received quarterly distributions at an equivalent rate to WES Operating’s publicly traded common units. The Class C unit distributions were paid-in-kind with additional Class C Units (“PIK Class C units”) and were disregarded with respect to WES Operating’s distributions of available cash. The number of PIK Class C units issued in connection with a distribution payable on the Class C units was determined by dividing the corresponding distribution attributable to the Class C units by the volume-weighted average price of WES Operating’s common units for the ten days immediately preceding the payment date of the common unit distribution, less a 6% discount. WES Operating recorded the PIK Class C unit distributions at fair value at the time of issuance. This Level-2 fair value measurement used WES Operating’s unit price as a significant input in the determination of the fair value. See Note 5 for further discussion of the Class C units.
In February 2019, immediately prior to the closing of the Merger, all outstanding Class C units converted into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis (see Note 1).
151
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
4. PARTNERSHIP DISTRIBUTIONS (CONTINUED)
WES Operating Series A Preferred unit distributions. As further described in Note 5, WES Operating issued Series A Preferred units representing limited partner interests in WES Operating to private investors in 2016. The Series A Preferred unitholders received quarterly distributions of cash equal to $0.68 per Series A Preferred unit, subject to certain adjustments. On March 1, 2017, 50% of the outstanding Series A Preferred units converted into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis, and on May 2, 2017, all remaining Series A Preferred units converted into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis. Such converted WES Operating common units were entitled to distributions made to WES Operating common unitholders with respect to the quarter during which the applicable conversion occurred and did not include a prorated Series A Preferred unit distribution. For the quarter ended March 31, 2017, the WES Operating Series A Preferred unitholders received an aggregate cash distribution of $7.5 million (paid in May 2017).
WES Operating’s general partner interest and incentive distribution rights. Prior to the closing of the Merger, WES Operating GP was entitled to 1.5% of all quarterly distributions that WES Operating made prior to its liquidation, and as the former holder of the IDRs, was entitled to incentive distributions at the maximum distribution-sharing percentage of 48.0% for all prior periods presented. Immediately prior to the closing of the Merger, the IDRs and the general partner units converted into WES Operating common units and a non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating (see Note 1).
5. EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Holdings of Partnership equity. The Partnership’s common units are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “WES.” As of December 31, 2019, Occidental held 242,136,976 common units, representing a 53.4% limited partner interest in the Partnership, and through its ownership of the general partner, Occidental indirectly held 9,060,641 general partner units, representing a 2.0% general partner interest in the Partnership (see Note 1). The public held 201,834,433 common units, representing a 44.6% limited partner interest in the Partnership.
In February 2019, the Partnership issued common units in connection with the closing of the Merger (see Note 1) as follows:
Partnership common units outstanding prior to the Merger | 218,937,797 | ||||
WES Operating common units outstanding prior to the Merger | 152,609,285 | ||||
WES Operating Class C units outstanding prior to the Merger | 14,681,388 | ||||
Less: WES Operating common units owned by the Partnership | (50,132,046 | ) | |||
WES Operating common units subject to conversion into Partnership common units | 117,158,627 | ||||
Exchange ratio per unit | 1.525 | ||||
Partnership common units issued for WES Operating common units (1) | 178,692,081 | ||||
WES Operating common units issued as part of the AMA acquisition | 45,760,201 | ||||
Less: WES Operating common units retained by a subsidiary of Anadarko | (6,375,284 | ) | |||
WES Operating acquisition common units subject to conversion into Partnership common units | 39,384,917 | ||||
Conversion ratio per unit | 1.4056 | ||||
Partnership common units issued for WES Operating acquisition common units | 55,360,984 | ||||
Partnership common units outstanding at February 28, 2019 | 452,990,862 |
(1) | Total Partnership units issued at Merger completion exceeds the calculation of such units using the exchange ratio due to the rounding convention described in the Merger Agreement. |
152
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
5. EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (CONTINUED)
Holdings of WES Operating equity. As of December 31, 2019, (i) the Partnership, directly and indirectly through its ownership of WES Operating GP, owned a 98.0% limited partner interest and the entire non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating and (ii) Occidental, through its ownership of WGRAH, owned a 2.0% limited partner interest in WES Operating, which is reflected as a noncontrolling interest within the consolidated financial statements of the Partnership (see Note 1).
WES Operating interests. The following table summarizes WES Operating’s units issued during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Common Units | Class C Units | General Partner Units | Total | |||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 | 152,602,105 | 13,243,883 | 2,583,068 | 168,429,056 | ||||||||
PIK Class C units | — | 1,128,782 | — | 1,128,782 | ||||||||
Vesting of Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards | 7,180 | — | — | 7,180 | ||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2018 | 152,609,285 | 14,372,665 | 2,583,068 | 169,565,018 | ||||||||
PIK Class C units | — | 308,723 | — | 308,723 | ||||||||
Conversion of Class C units | 14,681,388 | (14,681,388 | ) | — | — | |||||||
IDR and General partner unit conversion | 105,624,704 | — | (2,583,068 | ) | 103,041,636 | |||||||
Units issued as part of the AMA acquisition | 45,760,201 | — | — | 45,760,201 | ||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2019 (1) | 318,675,578 | — | — | 318,675,578 |
(1) | All WES Operating common units that converted into the Partnership’s common units at closing of the Merger were canceled and an equivalent amount of the canceled WES Operating common units were issued to the Partnership. See Note 1 for further details on the units issued and converted in connection with the closing of the Merger. |
WES Operating Class C units. In November 2014, WES Operating issued 10,913,853 Class C units to AMH, pursuant to a Unit Purchase Agreement with Anadarko and AMH. The Class C units were issued to partially fund the acquisition of DBM.
The Class C units were issued at a discount to the then-current market price of the common units into which they were convertible. This discount, totaling $34.8 million, represented a beneficial conversion feature, and at issuance, was reflected as an increase to WES Operating common unitholders’ capital and a decrease to Class C unitholder capital to reflect the fair value of the Class C units at issuance. The beneficial conversion feature was considered a non-cash distribution that was recognized from the date of issuance through the date of conversion, resulting in an increase to Class C unitholder capital and a decrease to WES Operating common unitholders’ capital as amortized. The beneficial conversion feature was amortized assuming an extended conversion date of March 1, 2020, using the effective yield method. The impact of the beneficial conversion feature amortization was included in the calculation of earnings per unit (see WES Operating’s net income (loss) per common unit below).
All outstanding Class C units converted into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis immediately prior to the closing of the Merger (see Note 1).
153
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
5. EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (CONTINUED)
WES Operating Series A Preferred units. In 2016, WES Operating issued 21,922,831 Series A Preferred units to private investors, generating proceeds of $686.9 million (net of fees and expenses, but including a 2.0% transaction fee paid to the private investors). The Series A Preferred units were issued at a discount to the then-current market price of the common units into which they were convertible. This discount, totaling $93.4 million, represented a beneficial conversion feature, and at issuance, was reflected as an increase to WES Operating common unitholders’ capital and a decrease to Series A Preferred unitholders’ capital to reflect the fair value of the Series A Preferred units on the date of issuance. The beneficial conversion feature was considered a non-cash distribution that was recognized from the date of issuance through the date of conversion, resulting in an increase to Series A Preferred unitholders’ capital and a decrease to WES Operating common unitholders’ capital as amortized. The beneficial conversion feature was amortized using the effective yield method. The impact of the beneficial conversion feature amortization was also included in the calculation of earnings per unit (see WES Operating’s net income (loss) per common unit below). For the year ended December 31, 2017, the amortization for the beneficial conversion feature of the Series A Preferred units was $62.3 million.
Pursuant to an agreement between WES Operating and the holders of the Series A Preferred units, 50% of the Series A Preferred units converted into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis on March 1, 2017, and all remaining Series A Preferred units converted into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis on May 2, 2017.
Partnership’s net income (loss) per common unit. As of December 31, 2019, following the transactions contemplated to the Exchange Agreement, the common and general partner unitholders’ allocation of net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership was equal to their cash distributions plus their respective allocations of undistributed earnings or losses. Specifically, net income equal to the amount of available cash (as defined by the partnership agreement) was allocated to the common and general partner unitholders consistent with actual cash distributions and capital account allocations. Undistributed earnings (net income in excess of distributions) or undistributed losses (available cash in excess of net income) were then allocated to the common and general partner unitholders in accordance with their weighted-average ownership percentage during each period.
The Partnership’s basic net income (loss) per common unit is calculated by dividing the limited partners’ interest in net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common units outstanding during the period. Net income (loss) attributable to assets acquired from Anadarko for periods prior to the acquisition of such assets was not allocated to the limited partners when calculating net income (loss) per common unit.
For periods prior to the Merger, dilutive net income (loss) per common unit was calculated by dividing the limited partners’ interest in net income (loss) adjusted for distributions on the WES Operating Series A Preferred units and a reallocation of the limited partners’ interest in net income (loss) assuming, prior to the actual conversion, conversion of the WES Operating Series A Preferred units into WES Operating common units, by the weighted-average number of the Partnership’s common units outstanding during the period. As of May 2, 2017, all WES Operating Series A Preferred units were converted into WES Operating common units on a one-for-one basis. The impact of the WES Operating Series A Preferred units assuming, prior to the actual conversion, conversion to WES Operating common units would be anti-dilutive for the year ended December 31, 2017.
154
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
5. EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (CONTINUED)
WES Operating’s net income (loss) per common unit. For periods subsequent to the closing of the Merger, net income (loss) per common unit for WES Operating is not calculated as it no longer has publicly traded units. For periods prior to the closing of the Merger, Net income (loss) attributable to Western Midstream Operating, LP earned on and subsequent to the date of acquisition of the Partnership’s assets was allocated in the below-described manner. Net income (loss) attributable to assets acquired from Anadarko for periods prior to the acquisition of such assets was not allocated to the unitholders for purposes of calculating net income (loss) per common unit.
WES Operating GP. The general partner’s allocation was equal to cash distributions plus its portion of undistributed earnings or losses. Specifically, net income equal to the amount of available cash (as defined by WES Operating’s partnership agreement) was allocated to the general partner consistent with actual cash distributions and capital account allocations, including incentive distributions. Undistributed earnings (net income in excess of distributions) or undistributed losses (available cash in excess of net income) were then allocated to the general partner in accordance with its weighted-average ownership percentage during each period.
WES Operating Series A Preferred unitholders. The Series A Preferred units were not considered a participating security as they only had distribution rights up to the specified per-unit quarterly distribution and had no rights to WES Operating’s undistributed earnings and losses. As such, the Series A Preferred unitholders’ allocation was equal to their cash distribution plus the amortization of the Series A Preferred units beneficial conversion feature (see WES Operating Series A Preferred units above).
WES Operating Common and Class C unitholders. The Class C units were considered a participating security because they participated in distributions with common units according to a predetermined formula (see Note 4). The common and Class C unitholders’ allocation was equal to their cash distributions plus their respective allocations of undistributed earnings or losses. Specifically, net income equal to the amount of available cash (as defined by the WES Operating partnership agreement) was allocated to the common and Class C unitholders consistent with actual cash distributions and capital account allocations. Undistributed earnings or undistributed losses were then allocated to the common and Class C unitholders in accordance with their respective weighted-average ownership percentages during each period. The common unitholder allocation also included the impact of the amortization of the Class C units beneficial conversion feature. Similarly, the Class C unitholder allocation was impacted by the amortization of the Class C units beneficial conversion feature (see WES Operating Class C units above).
Calculation of net income (loss) per unit. Basic net income (loss) per common unit was calculated by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders by the weighted-average number of common units outstanding during the period. The common units issued in connection with acquisitions and equity offerings were included on a weighted-average basis for the periods these units were outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per common unit was calculated by dividing the sum of (i) the net income (loss) attributable to common units adjusted for distributions on the Series A Preferred units and a reallocation of the common and Class C limited partners’ interest in net income (loss) assuming, prior to the actual conversion, conversion of the Series A Preferred units into common units, and (ii) the net income (loss) attributable to the Class C units as a participating security, by the sum of the weighted-average number of common units outstanding plus the dilutive effect of the (i) weighted-average number of outstanding Class C units and (ii) the weighted-average number of common units outstanding assuming, prior to the actual conversion, conversion of the Series A Preferred units.
155
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
5. EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (CONTINUED)
The following table illustrates the calculation of WES Operating’s net income (loss) per common unit:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
thousands except per-unit amounts | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Midstream Operating, LP | $ | 627,917 | $ | 731,666 | ||||
Pre-acquisition net (income) loss allocated to Anadarko | (182,142 | ) | (164,183 | ) | ||||
Series A Preferred units interest in net (income) loss (1) | — | (42,373 | ) | |||||
General partner interest in net (income) loss | (346,538 | ) | (303,835 | ) | ||||
Common and Class C limited partners’ interest in net income (loss) | $ | 99,237 | $ | 221,275 | ||||
Net income (loss) allocable to common units (1) | $ | 84,334 | $ | 192,066 | ||||
Net income (loss) allocable to Class C units (1) | 14,903 | 29,209 | ||||||
Common and Class C limited partners’ interest in net income (loss) | $ | 99,237 | $ | 221,275 | ||||
Net income (loss) per unit | ||||||||
Common units – basic and diluted (2) | $ | 0.55 | $ | 1.30 | ||||
Weighted-average units outstanding | ||||||||
Common units – basic and diluted | 152,606 | 147,194 | ||||||
Excluded due to anti-dilutive effect: | ||||||||
Class C units (2) | 13,795 | 12,776 | ||||||
Series A Preferred units assuming conversion to common units (2) | — | 5,406 |
(1) | Adjusted to reflect amortization of the beneficial conversion features. |
(2) | The impact of Class C units would be anti-dilutive for the periods presented and the conversion of Series A Preferred units would be anti-dilutive for the year ended December 31, 2017. On March 1, 2017, 50% of the outstanding Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis, and on May 2, 2017, all remaining Series A Preferred units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis. |
156
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Affiliate transactions. Affiliate revenues include (i) income from the Partnership’s investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting (see Note 10) and (ii) amounts earned by the Partnership from services provided to Occidental and from the sale of natural gas, condensate, and NGLs to Occidental. Occidental sells natural gas and NGLs as an agent on behalf of either the Partnership or the Partnership’s customers. When product sales are on the Partnership’s customers’ behalf, the Partnership recognizes associated service revenues and cost of product expense. When product sales are on the Partnership’s behalf, the Partnership recognizes product sales revenues based on Occidental’s sales price to the third party and records the associated cost of product expense. In addition, the Partnership purchases natural gas from an affiliate of Occidental pursuant to gas purchase agreements.
Operation and maintenance expense includes amounts accrued for or paid to affiliates for the operation of the Partnership’s assets and for services provided to affiliates, including field labor, measurement and analysis, and other disbursements. A portion of general and administrative expense is paid by Occidental, which results in affiliate transactions pursuant to the reimbursement provisions of the Partnership’s and WES Operating’s agreements with Occidental. Affiliate expenses do not bear a direct relationship to affiliate revenues, and third-party expenses do not bear a direct relationship to third-party revenues.
December 2019 Agreements. As discussed in more detail in Note 1, on December 31, 2019, the Partnership and certain of its subsidiaries, including WES Operating and WES Operating GP, entered into agreements with Occidental and/or certain of its subsidiaries, including Anadarko.
Merger transactions. As discussed in more detail in Note 1, on February 28, 2019, the Partnership, WES Operating, Anadarko, and certain of their affiliates completed the Merger and the other transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement, which included the acquisition of AMA from Anadarko. See Note 3.
Cash management. Occidental operates a cash management system for its subsidiaries’ separate bank accounts, including accounts for the Partnership and WES Operating. Prior to the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, third-party sales and purchases related to such assets were received or paid in cash by Anadarko within its centralized cash management system. Outstanding affiliate balances as of the dates of acquisition were settled entirely through an adjustment to net investment by Anadarko in connection with the acquisitions. Subsequent to asset acquisitions from Anadarko, transactions related to the acquired assets were cash-settled directly by the Partnership with third parties and Anadarko affiliates. Chipeta cash-settles its transactions directly with third parties, Occidental, and other subsidiaries of the Partnership.
Note receivable - Anadarko. In May 2008, WES Operating loaned $260.0 million to Anadarko in exchange for a 30-year note bearing interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.50%, payable quarterly and classified as Interest income – affiliates in the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the Anadarko note receivable was $337.7 million and $279.6 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Following Occidental’s acquisition by merger of Anadarko, the fair value of the Anadarko note receivable reflects consideration of Occidental’s credit risk and any premium or discount for the differential between the stated interest rate and quarter-end market interest rate, based on quoted market prices of similar debt instruments. Accordingly, the fair value of the note receivable is measured using Level-2 fair value inputs.
APCWH Note Payable. In June 2017, APCWH entered into an eight-year note payable agreement with Anadarko, which was repaid at the Merger completion date. See Note 1 and Note 13.
157
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
Commodity-price swap agreements. WES Operating entered into commodity-price swap agreements with Anadarko to mitigate exposure to the commodity-price risk inherent in WES Operating’s percent-of-proceeds, percent-of-product, and keep-whole natural-gas processing contracts. Notional volumes for each product-based commodity-price swap agreement were not specifically defined. Instead, the commodity-price swap agreements applied to the actual volumes of natural gas, condensate, and NGLs purchased and sold. The commodity-price swap agreements did not satisfy the definition of a derivative financial instrument and, therefore did not require fair-value measurement. Net gains (losses) on commodity-price swap agreements were $(0.7) million (due to settlement of 2018 activity in 2019), $(7.9) million, and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, and are reported in the consolidated statements of operations as affiliate Product sales in 2019 and 2018 and as affiliate Product sales and Cost of product in 2017. These commodity-price swap agreements expired without renewal on December 31, 2018.
Revenues or costs attributable to volumes sold and purchased under the commodity-price swap agreements for the DJ Basin complex and the MGR assets were recognized in the consolidated statements of operations at the applicable market price in the tables below. A capital contribution from Anadarko was recorded in the consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital for an amount equal to (i) the amount by which the swap price for product sales exceeds the applicable market price in the tables below, minus (ii) the amount by which the swap price for product purchases exceeds the applicable market price in the tables below. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, the capital contributions from Anadarko were $7.4 million, $51.6 million, and $58.6 million, respectively. The tables below summarize the swap prices compared to the forward market prices:
DJ Basin Complex | ||||||||||||
per barrel except natural gas | 2017 - 2018 Swap Prices | 2017 Market Prices (1) | 2018 Market Prices (1) | |||||||||
Ethane | $ | 18.41 | $ | 5.09 | $ | 5.41 | ||||||
Propane | 47.08 | 18.85 | 28.72 | |||||||||
Isobutane | 62.09 | 26.83 | 32.92 | |||||||||
Normal butane | 54.62 | 26.20 | 32.71 | |||||||||
Natural gasoline | 72.88 | 41.84 | 48.04 | |||||||||
Condensate | 76.47 | 45.40 | 49.36 | |||||||||
Natural gas (per MMBtu) | 5.96 | 3.05 | 2.21 |
MGR Assets | ||||||||||||
per barrel except natural gas | 2017 - 2018 Swap Prices | 2017 Market Prices (1) | 2018 Market Prices (1) | |||||||||
Ethane | $ | 23.11 | $ | 4.08 | $ | 2.52 | ||||||
Propane | 52.90 | 19.24 | 25.83 | |||||||||
Isobutane | 73.89 | 25.79 | 30.03 | |||||||||
Normal butane | 64.93 | 25.16 | 29.82 | |||||||||
Natural gasoline | 81.68 | 45.01 | 47.25 | |||||||||
Condensate | 81.68 | 53.55 | 56.76 | |||||||||
Natural gas (per MMBtu) | 4.87 | 3.05 | 2.21 |
(1) | Represents the New York Mercantile Exchange forward strip price as of December 1, 2016 and December 20, 2017, for the 2017 Market Prices and 2018 Market Prices, respectively, adjusted for product specification, location, basis, and, in the case of NGLs, transportation and fractionation costs. |
158
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
Gathering and processing agreements. The Partnership has significant gathering and processing arrangements with affiliates of Occidental on most of its systems. Natural-gas throughput (excluding equity-investment throughput) attributable to production owned or controlled by Occidental was 38%, 36%, and 39% for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water throughput (excluding equity-investment throughput) attributable to production owned or controlled by Occidental was 83%, 85%, and 81% for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Commodity purchase and sale agreements. The Partnership sells a significant amount of its natural gas and NGLs to Anadarko Energy Services Company (“AESC”), Occidental’s marketing affiliate that acts as the Partnership’s agent for third-party sales. In addition, the Partnership purchases natural gas from AESC pursuant to purchase agreements.
Marketing Transition Services Agreement. Effective December 31, 2019, certain subsidiaries of Anadarko entered into a transition services agreement (the “Marketing Transition Services Agreement”) to provide certain marketing-related services to certain of the Partnership’s subsidiaries through December 31, 2020, subject to the Partnership’s subsidiaries’ option to extend such services for an additional six-month period.
Shared services agreements. Pursuant to the agreements discussed below, Occidental performs centralized corporate functions for the Partnership and WES Operating such as legal; accounting; treasury; cash management; investor relations; insurance administration and claims processing; risk management; health, safety, and environmental; information technology; human resources; credit; payroll; internal audit; tax; and marketing and midstream administration.
WES omnibus agreement. Prior to December 31, 2019, the Partnership had an omnibus agreement with Occidental and the general partner (the “WES omnibus agreement”) that governed (i) the Partnership’s obligation to reimburse Occidental for expenses incurred or payments made on its behalf in connection with Occidental’s provision of general and administrative services provided to the Partnership, including certain public company expenses and general and administrative expenses; (ii) the Partnership’s obligation to pay Occidental, in quarterly installments, an administrative services fee of $250,000 per year, which was subject to an annual increase pursuant to the omnibus agreement; and (iii) the Partnership’s obligation to reimburse Occidental for all insurance coverage expenses it incurred or payments it made on the Partnership’s behalf. The WES omnibus agreement was terminated as part of the December 2019 Agreements (see Note 1).
The following table summarizes the amounts the Partnership reimbursed to Occidental, separate from, and in addition to, those reimbursed by WES Operating:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses | $ | 604 | $ | 269 | $ | 263 | ||||||
Public company expenses | 4,089 | 2,895 | 1,821 | |||||||||
Total reimbursement | $ | 4,693 | $ | 3,164 | $ | 2,084 |
159
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
WES Operating omnibus agreement. Prior to December 31, 2019, WES Operating had a separate omnibus agreement with Occidental and WES Operating GP (the “WES Operating omnibus agreement”) that governed (i) Occidental’s obligation to indemnify WES Operating for certain liabilities and WES Operating’s obligation to indemnify Occidental for certain liabilities, (ii) WES Operating’s obligation to reimburse Occidental for expenses incurred or payments made on its behalf in conjunction with Occidental’s provision of general and administrative services provided to WES Operating, including salary and benefits of Occidental personnel, public company expenses, general and administrative expenses, and salaries and benefits of WES Operating’s executive management who were employees of Occidental, and (iii) WES Operating’s obligation to reimburse Anadarko for all insurance coverage expenses it incurred or payments it made with respect to WES Operating’s assets. Occidental, in accordance with the partnership agreement and the WES Operating omnibus agreement, determined, in its reasonable discretion, amounts to be reimbursed by WES Operating in exchange for services provided under the WES Operating omnibus agreement. The WES Operating omnibus agreement was terminated as part of the December 2019 Agreements (see Note 1).
The following table summarizes the amounts WES Operating reimbursed to Occidental pursuant to the WES Operating omnibus agreement:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses | $ | 84,039 | $ | 35,077 | $ | 31,733 | ||||||
Public company expenses | 4,065 | 15,409 | 9,379 | |||||||||
Total reimbursement | $ | 88,104 | $ | 50,486 | $ | 41,112 |
Services and secondment agreement. Pursuant to the services and secondment agreement, which was amended and restated on December 31, 2019, and is now referred to as the Services Agreement, specified employees of Occidental are seconded to WES Operating GP to provide, under the direction, supervision, and control of the general partner, operating, routine maintenance, and other services with respect to the assets owned and operated by the Partnership. Occidental is reimbursed for the services provided by the seconded employees. The consolidated financial statements include costs allocated by Occidental for expenses incurred under the services and secondment agreement for periods including and subsequent to the Partnership’s prior asset acquisitions from Anadarko.
Pursuant to the Services Agreement, Occidental (i) seconds certain personnel employed by Occidental to WES Operating GP, in exchange for which WES Operating GP pays a monthly secondment and shared services fee to Occidental equivalent to the direct cost of the seconded employees and (ii) continues to provide certain administrative and operational services to the Partnership. The initial term of the Services Agreement is two years and will automatically extend for additional six-month periods unless either party provides a 30-day written notice of termination prior to the initial two-year or additional six-month period expires. However, the Services Agreement provides for the transfer of certain employees to the Partnership, which is anticipated to occur prior to the end of 2020. For additional information on the Services Agreement, see Note 1.
Allocation of costs. For periods prior to the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, the consolidated financial statements include costs allocated by Anadarko in the form of a management services fee. This management services fee was allocated based on the proportionate share of Anadarko’s revenues and expenses or other contractual arrangements. Management believes these allocation methodologies were reasonable.
160
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
Excluding the Partnership’s management team, who became employees of the Partnership on December 31, 2019, pursuant to the Services Agreement, the employees supporting the Partnership’s operations are employees of Occidental. Occidental allocates costs to the Partnership for its share of personnel costs, including costs associated with equity-based compensation plans, non-contributory defined benefit pension and postretirement plans, and defined contribution savings plans. In general, reimbursement to Occidental is either (i) on an actual basis for direct expenses Occidental and the general partner incur on the Partnership’s behalf, or (ii) based on an allocation of salaries and related employee benefits between WES Operating, WES Operating GP, and Occidental, based on estimates of time spent on each entity’s business and affairs. Most general and administrative expenses charged by Occidental are on an actual basis, and no general and administrative expenses, direct or allocable, include a mark-up or subsidy component. With respect to allocated costs, management believes the allocation method employed by Occidental is reasonable. Although it is not practicable to determine what the amount of these direct and allocated costs would be if the Partnership were to directly obtain these services, management believes that aggregate costs charged by Occidental are reasonable.
Tax sharing agreements. The Partnership and WES Operating have tax sharing agreements with Occidental, pursuant to which Occidental is reimbursed for the Partnership’s and WES Operating’s estimated share of taxes from all forms of taxation, excluding taxes imposed by the United States. Taxes for which Occidental is reimbursed include state taxes attributable to the Partnership’s and WES Operating’s income that are directly borne by Occidental through its filing of a combined or consolidated tax return. Taxes related to assets previously acquired from Anadarko were reimbursed in periods beginning on and subsequent to the acquisition of such assets. Occidental may use its own tax attributes to reduce or eliminate the tax liability of its combined or consolidated group, which may include the Partnership and WES Operating as members. However, under this circumstance, the Partnership and WES Operating nevertheless are required to reimburse Occidental for the allocable share of taxes that would have been owed had the tax attributes not been available to Occidental.
Indemnification agreements. Prior to December 31, 2019, WES Operating GP was indemnified by wholly owned subsidiaries of Occidental against any claims made against WES Operating GP for WES Operating’s long-term debt and/or borrowings under the RCF and Term loan facility. These indemnification agreements were terminated as part of the December 2019 Agreements (see Note 1).
LTIPs. The general partner has the authority to grant equity compensation awards under the Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (assumed by the Partnership in connection with the Merger) and the Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (collectively referred to as the “LTIPs”) to its independent directors, executive officers, and Occidental employees performing services for the Partnership from time to time. Phantom units awarded to the independent directors vest one year from the grant date, while all other phantom unit awards are subject to ratable vesting over a three-year service period.
The following table summarizes award activity under the Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value | Units | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value | Units | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value | Units | ||||||||||||||||
Phantom units outstanding at beginning of year | $ | 35.08 | 7,128 | $ | 43.39 | 5,763 | $ | 39.78 | 5,658 | ||||||||||||
Granted | 29.75 | 25,212 | 35.08 | 7,128 | 43.39 | 5,763 | |||||||||||||||
Vested | 31.62 | (44,572 | ) | 43.39 | (5,763 | ) | 39.78 | (5,658 | ) | ||||||||||||
Converted (1) | 33.46 | 12,232 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Phantom units outstanding at end of year | — | — | 35.08 | 7,128 | 43.39 | 5,763 |
(1) | At closing of the Merger, WES Operating phantom units awarded under the Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan converted into phantom units of the Partnership under the Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan. |
161
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes award activity under the Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which was assumed by the Partnership in connection with the Merger, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value | Units | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value | Units | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value | Units | ||||||||||||||||
Phantom units outstanding at beginning of year | $ | 49.88 | 8,020 | $ | 55.73 | 7,180 | $ | 49.30 | 7,304 | ||||||||||||
Granted | — | — | 49.88 | 8,020 | 55.73 | 7,180 | |||||||||||||||
Vested | — | — | 55.73 | (7,180 | ) | 49.30 | (7,304 | ) | |||||||||||||
Converted (1) | 49.88 | (8,020 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Phantom units outstanding at end of year | — | — | 49.88 | 8,020 | 55.73 | 7,180 |
(1) | At closing of the Merger, WES Operating phantom units awarded under the Western Gas Partners, LP 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan converted into phantom units of the Partnership under the Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan. |
Compensation expense for the LTIPs is recognized over the vesting period and was $1.0 million, $0.7 million, and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Incentive Plans. General and administrative expense includes equity-based compensation expense allocated to the Partnership by Occidental for awards granted to the executive officers of the general partner and to other employees under (i) the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, (ii) Occidental’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and (iii) Occidental’s Phantom Share Unit Award Plan (collectively referred to as the “Incentive Plans”). General and administrative expense includes costs related to the Incentive Plans of $12.9 million, $6.6 million, and $4.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Portions of these amounts are reflected as contributions to partners’ capital in the consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital. As of December 31, 2019, $7.9 million of estimated unrecognized compensation expense attributable to the Incentive Plans will be allocated to the Partnership over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.
Affiliate purchases. During the third quarter of 2019, the Partnership purchased $18.4 million of materials and supplies inventory from Occidental, which is included in Other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Affiliate asset contributions. The following table summarizes affiliate contributions of other assets to the Partnership:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Cash consideration paid | $ | (425 | ) | $ | (254 | ) | $ | (3,910 | ) | |||
Net carrying value | 335 | 59,089 | 5,283 | |||||||||
Partners’ capital adjustment | $ | (90 | ) | $ | 58,835 | $ | 1,373 |
162
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
Summary of affiliate transactions. The following table summarizes material affiliate transactions included in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Revenues and other (1) | $ | 1,607,396 | $ | 1,353,711 | $ | 1,539,105 | ||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates (1) | 237,518 | 195,469 | 115,141 | |||||||||
Operating expenses | ||||||||||||
Cost of product (1) | 254,771 | 168,535 | 74,560 | |||||||||
Operation and maintenance (1) | 146,990 | 115,948 | 82,249 | |||||||||
General and administrative (2) | 101,485 | 49,672 | 43,221 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 503,246 | 334,155 | 200,030 | |||||||||
Interest income (3) | 16,900 | 16,900 | 16,900 | |||||||||
Interest expense (4) | 1,970 | 6,746 | 224 | |||||||||
APCWH Note Payable borrowings | 11,000 | 321,780 | 98,813 | |||||||||
Repayment of APCWH Note Payable | 439,595 | — | — | |||||||||
Settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (5) | — | — | (37,346 | ) | ||||||||
Distributions to Partnership unitholders (6) | 566,868 | 400,194 | 360,523 | |||||||||
Distributions to WES Operating unitholders (7) | 19,768 | 7,583 | 7,100 | |||||||||
Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko | 7,407 | 51,618 | 58,551 |
(1) | Represents amounts earned or incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, and amounts earned or incurred by Anadarko on a historical basis for periods prior to the acquisition of such assets. |
(2) | Represents general and administrative expense incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, and a management services fee for expenses incurred by Anadarko for periods prior to the acquisition of such assets. These amounts include equity-based compensation expense allocated to the Partnership by Occidental (see LTIPs and Incentive Plans within this Note 6) and amounts charged by Occidental under the WES and WES Operating omnibus agreements. |
(3) | Represents interest income recognized on the Anadarko note receivable. |
(4) | Includes amounts related to finance leases and the APCWH Note Payable (see Note 1 and Note 13). |
(5) | Represents the cash payment to Anadarko for the settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (see Note 3). |
(6) | Represents distributions paid to Occidental pursuant to the partnership agreement of the Partnership (see Note 4 and Note 5). |
(7) | Represents distributions paid to certain subsidiaries of Occidental pursuant to WES Operating’s partnership agreement (see Note 4 and Note 5). |
The following table summarizes material affiliate transactions for WES Operating (which are included in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements) to the extent the amounts differ from the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
General and administrative (1) | $ | 99,613 | $ | 48,819 | $ | 42,411 | ||||||
Distributions to WES Operating unitholders (2) | 1,025,931 | 514,906 | 452,777 |
(1) | Represents general and administrative expense incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, and a management services fee for expenses incurred by Anadarko for periods prior to the acquisition of such assets. These amounts include equity-based compensation expense allocated to WES Operating by Occidental (see LTIPs and Incentive Plans within this Note 6) and amounts charged by Occidental pursuant to the WES Operating omnibus agreement. |
(2) | Represents distributions paid to the Partnership and certain subsidiaries of Occidental pursuant to WES Operating’s partnership agreement (see Note 4 and Note 5). For the year ended December 31, 2019, includes distributions to the Partnership and a subsidiary of Occidental related to the repayment of the WGP RCF (see Note 13). |
163
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
Concentration of credit risk. Occidental was the only customer from which revenues exceeded 10% of consolidated revenues for all periods presented in the consolidated statements of operations.
7. INCOME TAXES
The Partnership is not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Income attributable to the AMA assets prior to and including February 2019 was subject to federal and state income tax. Following the adoption of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed into law on December 22, 2017, AMA recognized a one-time deferred tax benefit of $87.3 million due to the remeasurement of its U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%.
During 2018, the accounting for the income tax effects related to the adoption of the Tax Reform Legislation was completed before the end of the measurement period. No additional adjustments to the provisional amount recorded in 2017 were recognized. The federal tax benefit is included in the Deferred income taxes balance as presented on the consolidated balance sheets.
The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Current income tax expense (benefit) | ||||||||||||
Federal income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 5,550 | $ | (79,264 | ) | $ | (9,207 | ) | ||||
State income tax expense (benefit) | 313 | (850 | ) | 2,422 | ||||||||
Total current income tax expense (benefit) | 5,863 | (80,114 | ) | (6,785 | ) | |||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) | ||||||||||||
Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 2,782 | 133,044 | (55,835 | ) | ||||||||
State income tax expense (benefit) | 4,827 | 6,004 | 2,697 | |||||||||
Total deferred income tax expense (benefit) | 7,609 | 139,048 | (53,138 | ) | ||||||||
Total income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 13,472 | $ | 58,934 | $ | (59,923 | ) |
Total income taxes differed from the amounts computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes. The sources of these differences are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands except percentages | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 821,172 | $ | 689,588 | $ | 677,462 | ||||||
Statutory tax rate | — | % | — | % | — | % | ||||||
Tax computed at statutory rate | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Adjustments resulting from: | ||||||||||||
U.S. federal tax reform | — | — | (87,306 | ) | ||||||||
Federal taxes on pre-acquisition income attributable to assets acquired from Anadarko | 8,332 | 54,243 | 22,353 | |||||||||
State taxes on pre-acquisition income attributable to assets acquired from Anadarko (net of federal benefit) | — | 1,745 | 164 | |||||||||
Texas margin tax expense (benefit) | 5,140 | 2,946 | 4,866 | |||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 13,472 | $ | 58,934 | $ | (59,923 | ) | |||||
Effective tax rate | 2 | % | 9 | % | (9 | )% |
164
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
7. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Depreciable property | $ | (18,642 | ) | $ | (280,377 | ) | ||
Credit carryforwards | — | 497 | ||||||
Other intangible assets | (678 | ) | (299 | ) | ||||
Other | 421 | 162 | ||||||
Net long-term deferred income tax liabilities | $ | (18,899 | ) | $ | (280,017 | ) |
8. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
A summary of the historical cost of property, plant, and equipment is as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||
thousands | Estimated Useful Life | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||
Land | n/a | $ | 9,495 | $ | 5,298 | |||||
Gathering systems – pipelines | 30 years | 5,092,004 | 4,764,099 | |||||||
Gathering systems – compressors | 15 years | 1,929,377 | 1,712,939 | |||||||
Processing complexes and treating facilities | 25 years | 3,237,801 | 2,844,337 | |||||||
Transportation pipeline and equipment | 6 to 45 years | 173,572 | 172,558 | |||||||
Produced-water disposal systems | 20 years | 754,774 | 629,946 | |||||||
Assets under construction | n/a | 486,584 | 604,265 | |||||||
Other | 3 to 40 years | 672,064 | 525,331 | |||||||
Total property, plant, and equipment | 12,355,671 | 11,258,773 | ||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | 3,290,740 | 2,848,420 | ||||||||
Net property, plant, and equipment | $ | 9,064,931 | $ | 8,410,353 |
The cost of property classified as “Assets under construction” is excluded from capitalized costs being depreciated. These amounts represent property that is not yet placed into productive service as of the respective balance sheet date.
Impairments. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Partnership recognized impairments of $6.3 million, primarily at the DJ Basin complex due to impairments of rights-of-way and cancellation of projects.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Partnership recognized impairments of $230.6 million, including impairments of $125.9 million at the Third Creek gathering system and $8.1 million at the Kitty Draw gathering system. These assets were impaired to estimated salvage values of $1.8 million and zero, respectively, using the market approach and Level-3 fair value inputs, due to the shutdown of these systems in May 2018. During 2018, the Partnership also recognized impairments of $38.7 million and $34.6 million at the Hilight and MIGC systems, respectively. These assets were impaired to estimated fair values of $4.9 million and $15.2 million, respectively, using the income approach and Level-3 fair value inputs, due to a reduction in estimated future cash flows. The remaining $23.3 million of impairments primarily was related to (i) a $10.9 million impairment at the GNB NGL pipeline, which was impaired to estimated fair value of $10.0 million using the income approach and Level-3 fair value inputs, and (ii) a $5.6 million impairment related to an idle facility at the Chipeta complex, which was impaired to estimated salvage value of $1.5 million using the market approach and Level-3 fair value inputs.
165
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
8. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED)
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership recognized impairments of $180.1 million, including an impairment of $158.8 million at the Granger complex, which was impaired to estimated fair value of $48.5 million using the income approach and Level-3 fair value inputs, due to a reduced throughput fee as a result of a producer’s bankruptcy. The remaining $21.3 million of impairments primarily was related to (i) an $8.2 million impairment due to the cancellation of a plant project at the Hilight system, (ii) a $3.7 million impairment at the Granger straddle plant, which was impaired to estimated salvage value of $0.6 million using the income approach and Level-3 fair value inputs, (iii) a $3.1 million impairment of the Fort Union equity investment, (iv) a $2.0 million impairment of an idle facility in northeast Wyoming, which was impaired to estimated salvage value of $0.4 million using the market approach and Level-3 fair value inputs, and (v) the cancellation of a pipeline project in West Texas.
9. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES
Goodwill. Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price of a business acquired exceeds the fair market value of the tangible and separately measurable intangible net assets. In addition, goodwill represents the allocated historic carrying value of midstream goodwill attributed to the Partnership’s assets previously acquired from Anadarko. The carrying value of Anadarko’s midstream goodwill at the time the assets were acquired from Anadarko, represented the excess of the purchase price paid to a third party over the estimated fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed by Anadarko. Accordingly, the Partnership’s allocated goodwill balance does not represent, and in some cases is significantly different from, the difference between the consideration the Partnership paid for its acquisitions from Anadarko and the fair value of such net assets on their respective acquisition dates.
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually (see Note 1). The Partnership’s annual qualitative goodwill impairment assessment as of October 1, 2019, indicated no impairment. Qualitative factors also were assessed in the fourth quarter of 2019 to review any changes in circumstances subsequent to the annual test. This assessment also indicated no impairment.
Other intangible assets. The intangible asset balance on the consolidated balance sheets includes the fair value, net of amortization, of (i) contracts assumed in connection with the Platte Valley and Wattenberg processing plant acquisitions in 2011, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 38 years, (ii) interconnect agreements at Chipeta entered into in November 2012, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 10 years, and (iii) contracts assumed in connection with the DBM acquisition in November 2014, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 30 years.
The Partnership assesses intangible assets for impairment together with related underlying long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. See Property, plant, and equipment in Note 1 for further discussion of management’s process to evaluate potential impairment of long-lived assets. No intangible asset impairment has been recognized in these consolidated financial statements.
The following table presents the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets:
December 31, | ||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Gross carrying amount | $ | 979,863 | $ | 979,863 | ||||
Accumulated amortization | (170,472 | ) | (138,455 | ) | ||||
Other intangible assets | $ | 809,391 | $ | 841,408 |
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $32.0 million, $30.8 million, and $30.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Intangible asset amortization recorded in each of the next five years is estimated to be $32.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2022, and $31.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024.
166
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. EQUITY INVESTMENTS
The following tables present the equity-investments activity for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
thousands | Balance at December 31, 2017 | Acquisitions | Equity income, net | Contributions (1) | Distributions | Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings (2) | Balance at December 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fort Union | $ | 7,030 | $ | — | $ | (1,433 | ) | $ | — | $ | (194 | ) | $ | (3,144 | ) | $ | 2,259 | |||||||||||
White Cliffs | 44,945 | — | 11,841 | 1,278 | (11,259 | ) | (3,785 | ) | 43,020 | |||||||||||||||||||
Rendezvous | 42,528 | — | 767 | — | (2,709 | ) | (2,745 | ) | 37,841 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mont Belvieu JV | 110,299 | — | 29,200 | — | (29,239 | ) | (5,311 | ) | 104,949 | |||||||||||||||||||
TEG | 15,879 | — | 4,290 | 3,720 | (4,368 | ) | (163 | ) | 19,358 | |||||||||||||||||||
TEP | 178,975 | — | 37,963 | 11,980 | (33,552 | ) | (2,168 | ) | 193,198 | |||||||||||||||||||
FRP | 166,555 | — | 23,308 | 14,980 | (23,481 | ) | (4,926 | ) | 176,436 | |||||||||||||||||||
Whitethorn LLC | — | 150,563 | 47,088 | 7,069 | (39,497 | ) | (3,365 | ) | 161,858 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cactus II | — | 12,052 | — | 94,308 | — | — | 106,360 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Saddlehorn | 109,227 | — | 15,833 | 294 | (16,017 | ) | (830 | ) | 108,507 | |||||||||||||||||||
Panola | 23,625 | — | 2,200 | — | (2,200 | ) | (856 | ) | 22,769 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mi Vida | 64,988 | — | 13,734 | — | (14,000 | ) | (91 | ) | 64,631 | |||||||||||||||||||
Ranch Westex | 53,301 | — | 10,678 | — | (10,876 | ) | (2,201 | ) | 50,902 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 817,352 | $ | 162,615 | $ | 195,469 | $ | 133,629 | $ | (187,392 | ) | $ | (29,585 | ) | $ | 1,092,088 |
thousands | Balance at December 31, 2018 | Acquisitions | Equity income, net | Contributions (1) | Distributions | Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings (2) | Balance at December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fort Union | $ | 2,259 | $ | — | $ | (2,232 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (637 | ) | $ | (610 | ) | |||||||||||
White Cliffs | 43,020 | — | 9,500 | 5,414 | (8,918 | ) | (3,139 | ) | 45,877 | |||||||||||||||||||
Rendezvous | 37,841 | — | 769 | — | (2,710 | ) | (2,936 | ) | 32,964 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mont Belvieu JV | 104,949 | — | 28,412 | — | (28,451 | ) | (1,874 | ) | 103,036 | |||||||||||||||||||
TEG | 19,358 | — | 4,088 | — | (4,110 | ) | (1,137 | ) | 18,199 | |||||||||||||||||||
TEP | 193,198 | — | 30,871 | 12,220 | (32,733 | ) | — | 203,556 | ||||||||||||||||||||
FRP | 176,436 | — | 32,617 | 30,175 | (31,446 | ) | — | 207,782 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Whitethorn LLC | 161,858 | — | 74,548 | 10,332 | (74,856 | ) | (10,217 | ) | 161,665 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cactus II | 106,360 | — | 10,755 | 56,252 | (1,202 | ) | — | 172,165 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Saddlehorn | 108,507 | — | 25,524 | 3,550 | (24,726 | ) | — | 112,855 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Panola | 22,769 | — | 2,136 | — | (2,137 | ) | (985 | ) | 21,783 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mi Vida | 64,631 | — | 10,655 | — | (12,077 | ) | (5,402 | ) | 57,807 | |||||||||||||||||||
Ranch Westex | 50,902 | — | 6,812 | — | (8,143 | ) | (2,893 | ) | 46,678 | |||||||||||||||||||
Red Bluff Express | — | 92,546 | 3,063 | 10,450 | (3,063 | ) | (1,036 | ) | 101,960 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,092,088 | $ | 92,546 | $ | 237,518 | $ | 128,393 | $ | (234,572 | ) | $ | (30,256 | ) | $ | 1,285,717 |
(1) | Includes capitalized interest of $1.4 million and $3.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively, related to the construction of the Cactus II pipeline. |
(2) | Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings, classified as investing cash flows in the consolidated statements of cash flows, are calculated on an individual-investment basis. |
167
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. EQUITY INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED)
The investment balance in Fort Union at December 31, 2019, is $3.1 million less than the Partnership’s underlying equity in Fort Union’s net assets due to an impairment loss recognized by the Partnership in 2017 for its investment in Fort Union.
The investment balance in Rendezvous at December 31, 2019, includes $32.4 million for the purchase price allocated to the investment in Rendezvous in excess of the historic cost basis of WGRI, the entity that previously owned the interest in Rendezvous, which Anadarko acquired in August 2006. This excess balance is attributable to the difference between the fair value and book value of such gathering and treating facilities (at the time WGRI was acquired by Anadarko) and is being amortized to Equity income, net – affiliates over the remaining estimated useful life of those facilities.
The investment balance in White Cliffs at December 31, 2019, is $5.8 million less than the Partnership’s underlying equity in White Cliffs’ net assets, primarily due to the Partnership recording the acquisition of its initial 0.4% interest in White Cliffs at Anadarko’s historic carrying value. This difference is being amortized to Equity income, net – affiliates over the remaining estimated useful life of the White Cliffs pipeline.
The investment balance in Whitethorn LLC at December 31, 2019, is $37.3 million less than the Partnership’s underlying equity in Whitethorn LLC’s net assets, primarily due to terms of the acquisition agreement which provided the Partnership a share of pre-acquisition operating cash flow. This difference is being amortized to Equity income, net – affiliates over the remaining estimated useful life of Whitethorn.
Management evaluates its equity investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such investments may have experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary. When evidence of loss in value has occurred, management compares the estimated fair value of the investment to the carrying value of the investment to determine whether the investment has been impaired. Management assesses the fair value of equity investments using commonly accepted techniques, and may use more than one method, including, but not limited to, recent third-party comparable sales and discounted cash flow models. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.
The following tables present the summarized combined financial information for equity investments (amounts represent 100% of investee financial information):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Revenues | $ | 1,687,116 | $ | 1,300,921 | $ | 877,020 | ||||||
Operating income | 1,107,664 | 876,910 | 542,390 | |||||||||
Net income | 1,108,173 | 874,587 | 540,538 |
December 31, | ||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Current assets | $ | 433,390 | $ | 297,143 | ||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net | 5,754,160 | 4,251,020 | ||||||
Other assets | 175,231 | 81,769 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 6,362,781 | $ | 4,629,932 | ||||
Current liabilities | 223,171 | $ | 101,729 | |||||
Non-current liabilities | 27,024 | 42,431 | ||||||
Equity | 6,112,586 | 4,485,772 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 6,362,781 | $ | 4,629,932 |
168
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
11. COMPONENTS OF WORKING CAPITAL
A summary of accounts receivable, net is as follows:
The Partnership | WES Operating | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Trade receivables, net | $ | 260,458 | $ | 221,119 | $ | 260,694 | $ | 221,328 | ||||||||
Other receivables, net | 54 | 45 | 54 | 45 | ||||||||||||
Total accounts receivable, net | $ | 260,512 | $ | 221,164 | $ | 260,748 | $ | 221,373 |
A summary of other current assets is as follows:
The Partnership | WES Operating | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
NGLs inventory | $ | 906 | $ | 1,203 | $ | 906 | $ | 1,203 | ||||||||
Materials and supplies inventory | 23,444 | 9,665 | 23,444 | 9,665 | ||||||||||||
Imbalance receivables | 4,690 | 9,035 | 4,690 | 9,035 | ||||||||||||
Prepaid insurance | 5,676 | 1,972 | 3,652 | 1,972 | ||||||||||||
Contract assets | 7,129 | 5,399 | 7,129 | 5,399 | ||||||||||||
Other | 93 | 4,184 | 93 | 3,309 | ||||||||||||
Total other current assets | $ | 41,938 | $ | 31,458 | $ | 39,914 | $ | 30,583 |
A summary of accrued liabilities is as follows:
The Partnership | WES Operating | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest expense | $ | 72,064 | $ | 70,968 | $ | 72,064 | $ | 70,959 | ||||||||
Short-term asset retirement obligations | 22,472 | 25,938 | 22,472 | 25,938 | ||||||||||||
Short-term remediation and reclamation obligations | 3,528 | 863 | 3,528 | 863 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes payable | 697 | 384 | 697 | 384 | ||||||||||||
Contract liabilities | 19,659 | 16,235 | 19,659 | 16,235 | ||||||||||||
Other (1) | 31,373 | 14,760 | 31,219 | 13,495 | ||||||||||||
Total accrued liabilities | $ | 149,793 | $ | 129,148 | $ | 149,639 | $ | 127,874 |
(1) | Includes amounts related to WES Operating’s interest-rate swap agreements as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (see Note 13). Includes lease liabilities related to the implementation of ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) as of December 31, 2019 (see Note 1). |
169
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
12. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The following table provides a summary of changes in asset retirement obligations:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Carrying amount of asset retirement obligations at beginning of year | $ | 325,962 | $ | 154,571 | ||||
Liabilities incurred | 27,360 | 34,558 | ||||||
Liabilities settled | (17,104 | ) | (12,432 | ) | ||||
Accretion expense | 13,599 | 7,909 | ||||||
Revisions in estimated liabilities | 9,051 | 141,356 | ||||||
Carrying amount of asset retirement obligations at end of year | $ | 358,868 | $ | 325,962 |
The liabilities incurred for the year ended December 31, 2019, represented additions in asset retirement obligations primarily due to capital expansions at the West Texas and DJ Basin complexes. Revisions in estimated liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily related to (i) changes in expected settlement costs at the West Texas and DJ Basin complexes and (ii) changes to the expected abandonment timing of transportation assets in Wyoming.
The liabilities incurred for the year ended December 31, 2018, represented additions in asset retirement obligations primarily due to capital expansions at the West Texas and DJ Basin complexes, the DBM water systems, and the DBM oil system. Revisions in estimated liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily included (i) $71.8 million related to changes in expected settlement costs and timing, primarily at the DJ Basin and West Texas complexes and the MGR assets, and (ii) $43.4 million related to the shutdown of the Third Creek gathering system during the second quarter of 2018. See Note 1 for further information.
170
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
13. DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE
WES Operating is the borrower for all outstanding debt, excluding the WGP RCF, and is expected to be the borrower for all future debt issuances. The following table presents the outstanding debt:
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands | Principal | Carrying Value | Fair Value (1) | Principal | Carrying Value | Fair Value (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WGP RCF | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 28,000 | $ | 28,000 | $ | 28,000 | ||||||||||||
Finance lease liabilities (2) | 7,873 | 7,873 | 7,873 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Total short-term debt | $ | 7,873 | $ | 7,873 | $ | 7,873 | $ | 28,000 | $ | 28,000 | $ | 28,000 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.375% Senior Notes due 2021 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 498,168 | $ | 515,042 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 496,959 | $ | 515,990 | ||||||||||||
4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 | 670,000 | 669,322 | 689,784 | 670,000 | 669,078 | 662,109 | ||||||||||||||||||
3.950% Senior Notes due 2025 | 500,000 | 493,830 | 504,968 | 500,000 | 492,837 | 466,135 | ||||||||||||||||||
4.650% Senior Notes due 2026 | 500,000 | 496,197 | 513,393 | 500,000 | 495,710 | 483,994 | ||||||||||||||||||
4.500% Senior Notes due 2028 | 400,000 | 395,113 | 390,920 | 400,000 | 394,631 | 377,475 | ||||||||||||||||||
4.750% Senior Notes due 2028 | 400,000 | 396,190 | 400,962 | 400,000 | 395,841 | 384,370 | ||||||||||||||||||
5.450% Senior Notes due 2044 | 600,000 | 593,470 | 533,710 | 600,000 | 593,349 | 522,386 | ||||||||||||||||||
5.300% Senior Notes due 2048 | 700,000 | 686,843 | 610,841 | 700,000 | 686,648 | 605,327 | ||||||||||||||||||
5.500% Senior Notes due 2048 | 350,000 | 342,432 | 310,198 | 350,000 | 342,328 | 311,536 | ||||||||||||||||||
RCF | 380,000 | 380,000 | 380,000 | 220,000 | 220,000 | 220,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Term loan facility | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
APCWH Note Payable | — | — | — | 427,493 | 427,493 | 427,493 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total long-term debt | $ | 8,000,000 | $ | 7,951,565 | $ | 7,849,818 | $ | 5,267,493 | $ | 5,214,874 | $ | 4,976,815 |
(1) | Fair value is measured using the market approach and Level-2 fair value inputs. |
(2) | Amounts are considered affiliate. See Note 14. |
171
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
13. DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE (CONTINUED)
Debt activity. The following table presents the debt activity for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
thousands | Carrying Value | |||
Balance at December 31, 2017 | $ | 3,591,678 | ||
RCF borrowings | 540,000 | |||
APCWH Note Payable borrowings | 321,780 | |||
Issuance of 4.500% Senior Notes due 2028 | 400,000 | |||
Issuance of 5.300% Senior Notes due 2048 | 700,000 | |||
Issuance of 4.750% Senior Notes due 2028 | 400,000 | |||
Issuance of 5.500% Senior Notes due 2048 | 350,000 | |||
Repayment of 2.600% Senior Notes due 2018 | (350,000 | ) | ||
Repayments of RCF borrowings | (690,000 | ) | ||
Other | (20,584 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2018 | $ | 5,242,874 | ||
RCF borrowings | 1,160,000 | |||
Term loan facility borrowings | 3,000,000 | |||
APCWH Note Payable borrowings | 11,000 | |||
Finance lease liabilities | 7,873 | |||
Repayments of RCF borrowings | (1,000,000 | ) | ||
Repayment of WGP RCF borrowings | (28,000 | ) | ||
Repayment of APCWH Note Payable | (439,595 | ) | ||
Other | 5,286 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | 7,959,438 |
WES Operating Senior Notes. At December 31, 2019, WES Operating was in compliance with all covenants under the relevant governing indentures.
WGP RCF. In February 2018, the Partnership voluntarily reduced the aggregate commitment of lenders under the WGP RCF to $35.0 million. The WGP RCF, which previously was available to purchase WES Operating common units and for general partnership purposes, matured in March 2019 and the $28.0 million of outstanding borrowings were repaid.
Revolving credit facility. The RCF is expandable to a maximum of $2.5 billion and bears interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus applicable margins ranging from 1.00% to 1.50%, or an alternate base rate equal to the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.50%, or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00%, in each case plus applicable margins currently ranging from zero to 0.50%, based on WES Operating’s senior unsecured debt rating. A required quarterly facility fee is paid ranging from 0.125% to 0.250% of the commitment amount (whether drawn or undrawn), which also is based on the senior unsecured debt rating. In December 2019, WES Operating entered into an amendment to the RCF to, among other things, exercise the final one-year extension option to extend the maturity date of the RCF from February 2024 to February 2025, for each extending lender. The maturity date with respect to each non-extending lender, whose commitments represent $100.0 million out of $2.0 billion of total commitments from all lenders, remains February 2024. See Note 1.
As of December 31, 2019, there were $380.0 million of outstanding borrowings and $4.6 million of outstanding letters of credit, resulting in $1.6 billion of available borrowing capacity under the RCF. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the interest rate on any outstanding RCF borrowings was 3.04% and 3.74%, respectively. The facility fee rate was 0.20% at December 31, 2019 and 2018. At December 31, 2019, WES Operating was in compliance with all covenants under the RCF.
172
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
13. DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE (CONTINUED)
Term loan facility. In December 2018, WES Operating entered into the Term loan facility, the proceeds from which were used to fund substantially all of the cash portion of the consideration under the Merger Agreement and the payment of related transaction costs (see Note 1). The Term loan facility bears interest at LIBOR, plus applicable margins ranging from 1.000% to 1.625%, or an alternate base rate equal to the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.50%, or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00%, in each case as defined in the Term loan facility and plus applicable margins currently ranging from zero to 0.625%, based on WES Operating’s senior unsecured debt rating. Net cash proceeds received from future asset sales and debt or equity offerings must be used to repay amounts outstanding under the facility.
In July 2019, WES Operating entered into an amendment to the Term loan facility to (i) extend the maturity date from February 2020 to December 2020, (ii) increase commitments available under the Term loan facility from $2.0 billion to $3.0 billion, the incremental $1.0 billion of which was subsequently drawn by WES Operating on September 13, 2019, and used to repay outstanding borrowings under the RCF, and (iii) modify the provision requiring that all debt issuance proceeds be used to repay the Term loan facility to allow for a $1.0 billion exclusion for debt-offering proceeds.
As of December 31, 2019, there were $3.0 billion of outstanding borrowings under the Term loan facility that were subject to an interest rate of 3.10%. WES Operating was in compliance with all covenants under the Term loan facility as of December 31, 2019. The outstanding borrowings under the Term loan facility were classified as Long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019. In January 2020, WES Operating repaid the outstanding borrowings under the Term loan facility with proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes and Floating Rate Notes (see Note 16).
Prior to December 31, 2019, WES Operating GP was indemnified by wholly owned subsidiaries of Occidental against any claims made against WES Operating GP for WES Operating’s long-term debt and/or borrowings under the RCF and Term loan facility. These indemnification agreements were terminated as part of the December 2019 Agreements (see Note 1).
APCWH Note Payable. In June 2017, in connection with funding the construction of the APC water systems that were acquired as part of the AMA acquisition, APCWH entered into an eight-year note payable agreement with Anadarko. This note payable had a maximum borrowing limit of $500.0 million, including accrued interest, which was payable at maturity at the applicable mid-term federal rate based on a quarterly compounding basis as determined by the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury. As of December 31, 2018, the interest rate on the outstanding borrowings was 3.04%. The APCWH Note Payable was repaid at Merger completion. See Note 1.
Interest-rate swaps. In December 2018 and March 2019, WES Operating entered into interest-rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional principal amount of $750.0 million and $375.0 million, respectively, to manage interest-rate risk associated with anticipated debt issuances. Pursuant to these swap agreements, WES Operating received a floating interest rate indexed to the three-month LIBOR and paid a fixed interest rate. In November and December 2019, WES Operating entered into additional interest-rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional principal amount of $1,125.0 million. Pursuant to these swap agreements, WES Operating received a fixed interest rate and paid a floating interest rate indexed to the three-month LIBOR, effectively offsetting the swap agreements entered into in December 2018 and March 2019.
In December 2019, all outstanding interest-rate swap agreements were cash-settled. As part of the settlement, WES Operating made cash payments of $107.7 million and recorded an accrued liability of $25.6 million to be paid quarterly in 2020. These cash payments were classified as cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
173
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
13. DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE (CONTINUED)
The Partnership did not apply hedge accounting and, therefore, gains and losses associated with the interest-rate swap agreements were recognized in earnings. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, net losses of $125.3 million and $8.0 million, respectively, were recognized, which are included in Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations.
Valuation of the interest-rate swaps was based on similar transactions observable in active markets and industry standard models that primarily rely on market-observable inputs. Inputs used to estimate fair value in industry standard models are categorized as Level-2 inputs because substantially all assumptions and inputs are observable in active markets throughout the full term of the instruments. Inputs used to estimate the fair value include market price curves, contract terms and prices, and credit risk adjustments. The fair value of the interest-rate swaps was a liability of $8.0 million at December 31, 2018, which is reported within Accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Interest expense. The following table summarizes the amounts included in interest expense:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Third parties | ||||||||||||
Long-term and short-term debt | $ | (315,872 | ) | $ | (200,454 | ) | $ | (143,400 | ) | |||
Amortization of debt issuance costs and commitment fees | (12,424 | ) | (9,110 | ) | (7,970 | ) | ||||||
Capitalized interest | 26,980 | 32,479 | 9,074 | |||||||||
Total interest expense – third parties | (301,316 | ) | (177,085 | ) | (142,296 | ) | ||||||
Affiliates | ||||||||||||
APCWH Note Payable | (1,833 | ) | (6,746 | ) | (153 | ) | ||||||
Finance lease liabilities | (137 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko | — | — | (71 | ) | ||||||||
Total interest expense – affiliates | (1,970 | ) | (6,746 | ) | (224 | ) | ||||||
Interest expense | $ | (303,286 | ) | $ | (183,831 | ) | $ | (142,520 | ) |
174
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
14. LEASES
Lessee. The Partnership has entered into operating leases that extend through 2028 for corporate offices, shared field offices, and equipment supporting the Partnership’s operations, with both Occidental and third parties as lessors. The Partnership also has subleased equipment from Occidental via finance leases extending through April 2020.
The following table summarizes information related to the Partnership’s leases at December 31, 2019:
thousands except lease term and discount rate | Operating Leases | Finance Leases | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Other assets | $ | 3,985 | $ | — | ||||
Net property, plant, and equipment | — | 7,892 | ||||||
Total lease assets (1) | $ | 3,985 | $ | 7,892 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Accrued liabilities | $ | 1,805 | $ | — | ||||
Short-term debt | — | 7,873 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 3,035 | — | ||||||
Total lease liabilities (1) | $ | 4,840 | $ | 7,873 | ||||
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years) | 5 | — | ||||||
Weighted-average discount rate | 4.7 | % | 2.9 | % |
(1) | Includes additions to ROU assets and lease liabilities of $8.5 million related to finance leases for the year ended December 31, 2019. |
Lease expense charged to the Partnership was $56.5 million and $45.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The following table summarizes the Partnership’s lease cost for the year ended December 31, 2019:
thousands | Year Ended December 31, 2019 | |||
Operating lease cost | $ | 6,932 | ||
Short-term lease cost | 1,295 | |||
Variable lease cost | 256 | |||
Sublease income | (414 | ) | ||
Finance lease cost | ||||
Amortization of ROU assets | 562 | |||
Interest on lease liabilities | 137 | |||
Total lease cost | $ | 8,768 |
The following table summarizes cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2019:
thousands | Operating Leases | Finance Leases | ||||||
Operating cash flows | $ | 7,042 | $ | 118 | ||||
Financing cash flows | — | 508 |
175
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
14. LEASES (CONTINUED)
The following table reconciles the undiscounted cash flows to the operating and finance lease liabilities at December 31, 2019:
thousands | Operating Leases | Finance Leases | ||||||
2020 | $ | 1,969 | $ | 7,934 | ||||
2021 | 612 | — | ||||||
2022 | 618 | — | ||||||
2023 | 625 | — | ||||||
2024 | 449 | — | ||||||
Thereafter | 1,209 | — | ||||||
Total lease payments | 5,482 | 7,934 | ||||||
Less portion representing imputed interest | 642 | 61 | ||||||
Total lease liabilities | $ | 4,840 | $ | 7,873 |
The amounts in the table below represent contractual operating lease commitments at December 31, 2018, that were assigned or otherwise charged to the Partnership pursuant to the reimbursement provisions of the omnibus agreement (see Note 1):
thousands | ||||
2019 | $ | 8,711 | ||
2020 | 2,236 | |||
2021 | 460 | |||
2022 | 467 | |||
2023 | 473 | |||
Thereafter | 1,547 | |||
Total lease payments | $ | 13,894 |
Lessor. Effective December 31, 2019, an affiliate of Occidental and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, entered into an operating and maintenance agreement, pursuant to which Occidental provides operational and maintenance services with respect to a crude-oil gathering system and associated treating facilities owned by the Partnership through December 31, 2021. This agreement includes (i) fixed consideration, which is measured as the minimum-volume commitment for both gathering and treating, and (ii) variable consideration, which consists of all volumes above the minimum-volume commitment. Subsequent to the initial two-year term, the agreement provides for automatic one-year extensions, unless either party exercises its option to terminate the lease with advance notice.
The following table presents the undiscounted cash flows expected to be received for all operating leases in effect as of December 31, 2019. This presentation includes minimum fixed lease payments and does not include an estimate of variable lease consideration.
thousands | ||||
2020 | $ | 157,582 | ||
2021 | 193,925 | |||
2022 | — | |||
2023 | — | |||
2024 | — | |||
Thereafter | — | |||
Total lease payments | $ | 351,507 |
176
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP AND WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental obligations. The Partnership is subject to various environmental-remediation obligations arising from federal, state, and local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal, and other environmental matters. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the consolidated balance sheets included $5.4 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of liabilities for remediation and reclamation obligations. The current portion of these amounts is included in Accrued liabilities and the long-term portion of these amounts is included in Other liabilities. The recorded obligations do not include any anticipated insurance recoveries. The majority of payments related to these obligations are expected to be made over the next five years. Management regularly monitors the remediation and reclamation process and the liabilities recorded and believes its environmental obligations are adequate to fund remedial actions required to comply with present laws and regulations, and that the ultimate liability for these matters, if any, will not differ materially from recorded amounts nor materially affect the overall results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition. There can be no assurance, however, that current regulatory requirements will not change, or past non-compliance with environmental issues will not be discovered. See Note 11 and Note 12.
Litigation and legal proceedings. From time to time, the Partnership is involved in legal, tax, regulatory, and other proceedings in various forums regarding performance, contracts, and other matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. Management is not aware of any such proceeding for which the final disposition could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Other commitments. The Partnership has short-term payment obligations, or commitments, related to its capital spending programs, and those of its unconsolidated affiliates, the majority of which is expected to be paid in the next twelve months. These commitments primarily relate to construction and expansion projects at the West Texas and DJ Basin complexes, DBM oil system, and DBM water systems.
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In January 2020, WES Operating issued the following notes:
• | $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.100% Senior Notes due 2025, $1.2 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.050% Senior Notes due 2030, and $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 5.250% Senior Notes due 2050, offered to the public at prices of 99.962%, 99.900%, and 99.442%, respectively, of the face amount (collectively referred to as the “Senior Notes”). Interest is paid on each such series semi-annually on February 1 and August 1 of each year, beginning August 1, 2020; and |
• | $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of floating rate Senior Notes due 2023 (the “Floating Rate Notes”). Interest is paid quarterly in arrears on January 13, April 13, July 13, and October 13 of each year, beginning April 13, 2020. Interest will accrue from January 13, 2020 at a benchmark rate (which will initially be a three-month LIBOR rate) on the interest determination date plus 0.85%. |
The interest payable on the Senior Notes and Floating Rate Notes will be subject to adjustment from time to time if the credit rating assigned to the notes declines below certain specified levels or if it declines and subsequently increases.
The net proceeds from the Senior Notes and Floating Rate Notes were used to repay the $3.0 billion outstanding borrowings under the Term loan facility, outstanding amounts under the RCF, and for general partnership purposes.
177
The following table presents a summary of operating results by quarter for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Operating results reflect the operations of our assets (as defined in Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) from the dates of common control, unless otherwise noted. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures.
thousands except per-unit amounts | First Quarter | Second Quarter | Third Quarter | Fourth Quarter | ||||||||||||
2019 | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues and other | $ | 671,883 | $ | 685,054 | $ | 666,027 | $ | 723,210 | ||||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates | 57,992 | 63,598 | 53,893 | 62,035 | ||||||||||||
Cost of product | 114,063 | 122,877 | 97,800 | 109,507 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 318,928 | 310,060 | 268,725 | 333,630 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 211,979 | 175,058 | 125,223 | 295,440 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Midstream Partners, LP | 118,660 | 169,594 | 121,217 | 287,770 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per common unit – basic and diluted (1) | 0.30 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.62 | ||||||||||||
2018 | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues and other | $ | 501,054 | $ | 518,078 | $ | 587,900 | $ | 692,626 | ||||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates | 30,229 | 49,430 | 54,215 | 61,595 | ||||||||||||
Cost of product | 94,318 | 95,656 | 101,035 | 124,496 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 224,867 | 114,214 | 257,554 | 264,647 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 181,010 | 67,167 | 198,560 | 183,917 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Western Midstream Partners, LP | 131,527 | 100,184 | 151,357 | 168,503 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per common unit – basic and diluted (1) | 0.46 | 0.31 | 0.49 | 0.43 |
(1) | Represents net income (loss) earned on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of assets from Anadarko. |
178
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WES’s general partner and WES Operating GP (for purposes of this Item 9A, “Management”) performed an evaluation of WES’s and WES Operating’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. WES’s and WES Operating’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, Management concluded that WES’s and WES Operating’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2019.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. See Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm. See Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. On August 8, 2019, Anadarko, the indirect general partner and majority unitholder of WES, was acquired by Occidental pursuant to the Occidental Merger. Occidental is in the process of integrating Anadarko and its internal control processes, resulting in certain of Anadarko’s internal controls shared by WES and WES Operating being superseded by Occidental’s internal controls. With the exception of Occidental shared controls, there were no changes in WES’s or WES Operating’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2019, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, WES’s or WES Operating’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
179
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
Management of Western Midstream Partners, LP
As an MLP, we have no directors or officers. Instead, our general partner manages our operations and activities. Our general partner is not elected by our unitholders and is not subject to re-election in the future. The directors of our general partner oversee our operations. Unitholders are not entitled to elect the directors of our general partner or directly or indirectly participate in our management or operations. However, our general partner owes duties to our unitholders as defined and described in our partnership agreement. Our general partner will be liable, as general partner, for all of our debts (to the extent not paid from our assets), except for indebtedness or other obligations that are made specifically nonrecourse to it. Our general partner, therefore, may cause us to incur indebtedness or other obligations that are nonrecourse to it.
Our Board of Directors has 11 members, five of whom are independent as defined under the independence standards established by the NYSE and the Exchange Act. The NYSE does not require a listed limited partnership, such as us, to have a majority of independent directors on the Board of Directors or to establish a compensation committee or a nominating committee. Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Steven D. Arnold, James R. Crane, Thomas R. Hix, Craig W. Stewart, and David J. Tudor are independent as described in the rules of the NYSE and the Exchange Act. With respect to Mr. Crane (the principal owner and Chairman of the Houston Astros Baseball Club), the Board specifically considered payments made by Occidental to Houston Astros-affiliated companies for viewing suites, concessions, sponsorship, and advertising opportunities, and contributions made by Occidental to charitable institutions affiliated with Mr. Crane. The Board determined that such transactions do not impact Mr. Crane’s independence.
The officers of our general partner are also officers of WES Operating GP. During 2019, the executive officers of our general partner allocated their time between managing our business and affairs and the business and affairs of Occidental. Following the execution of the Services Agreement on December 31, 2019, the executive officers and certain other management personnel of our general partner are employed directly by the Partnership and devote 100% of their time to our business and affairs. The remaining employees that operate our business are currently Occidental employees, but will be transferred to direct employment by the Partnership prior to the end of 2020, as required by the Services Agreement. The Services Agreement, the omnibus agreements, which were terminated on December 31, 2019, and the services and secondment agreement, which was amended and restated on December 31, 2019 by the Services Agreement, are described under Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K.
Board Leadership Structure
Occidental owns our general partner and, within the limitations of our partnership agreement and applicable SEC and NYSE rules and regulations, also exercises broad discretion in establishing the governance provisions of our general partner’s limited liability company agreement. Accordingly, our general partner’s board structure is established by Occidental.
Although our general partner’s board structure has historically separated the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our general partner’s limited liability company agreement and Corporate Governance Guidelines permit the roles of Chairman and CEO to be combined. Those roles may be combined in the future.
180
Directors and Executive Officers
The biography of each director below contains information regarding that person’s service as a director, business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, and involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes, or skills that caused our general partner and its Board of Directors to determine that the person should serve as a director of our general partner. In light of our strategic relationship with our sponsor, Occidental, our general partner considers service as an Occidental executive to be a meaningful qualification for service as a non-independent director of our general partner.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the directors and executive officers of our general partner as of February 24, 2020.
Name | Age | Position with Western Midstream Holdings, LLC | |||
Glenn Vangolen | 60 | Chairman of the Board (effective August 8, 2019) | |||
Michael P. Ure | 43 | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (effective August 8, 2019) | |||
Michael C. Pearl | 48 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (effective October 17, 2019) | |||
Robert W. Bourne | 64 | Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer (effective October 17, 2019) | |||
Craig W. Collins | 47 | Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (effective August 8, 2019) | |||
Christopher B. Dial | 43 | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary (effective December 16, 2019) | |||
Catherine A. Green | 46 | Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (effective October 17, 2019) | |||
Charles G. Griffie | 46 | Senior Vice President, Operations and Engineering (effective October 17, 2019) | |||
Robin H. Fielder | 39 | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (through August 7, 2019) | |||
Jaime R. Casas | 49 | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (through October 16, 2019) | |||
Steven D. Arnold | 59 | Director (effective February 28, 2019) | |||
Marcia E. Backus | 65 | Director (effective August 8, 2019) | |||
Peter J. Bennett | 51 | Director (effective August 8, 2019) | |||
Oscar K. Brown | 49 | Director (effective August 8, 2019) | |||
James R. Crane | 66 | Director (effective February 28, 2019) | |||
Thomas R. Hix | 72 | Director | |||
Jennifer M. Kirk | 45 | Director (effective August 8, 2019) | |||
Craig W. Stewart | 65 | Director | |||
David J. Tudor | 60 | Director |
181
Our directors hold office until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until the earlier of their death, resignation, removal, or disqualification. Officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
Glenn Vangolen Houston, Texas Director since: August 2019 Not Independent | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Vangolen has served as a director of our general partner’s Board of Directors since August 2019. Mr. Vangolen has been Senior Vice President, Business Support of Occidental since February 2015. In this role, Mr. Vangolen oversees the Human Resources and Administration; Information Technology; Flight Operations; Health, Environment, Safety, and Security; Government Relations and Corporate Secretary functions of Occidental. Mr. Vangolen has held positions of increasing responsibility in the oil and gas and corporate segments within Occidental, including senior leadership positions in the Middle East. |
Michael P. Ure Houston, Texas Director since: August 2019 Not Independent Officer since: August 2019 | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Ure has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of our general partner and as a director of our general partner’s Board of Directors since August 2019. Prior to joining WES, Mr. Ure served as Senior Vice President, Business Development of Occidental Oil and Gas beginning in July 2017 and as Vice President, Mergers and Acquisitions of Occidental from October 2014 to July 2017. Mr. Ure held a leadership role in evaluating acquisition and divestiture opportunities including, during his tenure, accountability for Occidental’s business development activities in North and Latin America. Prior to joining Occidental, Mr. Ure served in a leadership role with Shell Exploration and Production’s Upstream Americas Business Development organization and as an investment banker in New York, London, and Houston; most recently with Goldman, Sachs & Co. During his career, Mr. Ure has worked on total closed transactions representing more than $150 billion in value. |
Michael C. Pearl Houston, Texas Officer since: October 2019 | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Pearl has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of our general partner since October 2019. Mr. Pearl joined Anadarko in 2004 and served in various leadership positions within Anadarko’s accounting and finance organization, including Director Corporate Tax, Corporate Controller, Vice President Finance and Treasurer, and most recently as Senior Vice President, Investor Relations. Mr. Pearl also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of Western Midstream Operating, LP (formerly Western Gas Partners, LP) at the time of its 2008 IPO. Prior to joining Anadarko, Mr. Pearl began his career at EY, where he held positions of increasing responsibility in corporate tax and finance. |
Robert W. Bourne Houston, Texas Officer since: October 2019 | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Bourne has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer of our general partner since October 2019. Prior to joining WES, Mr. Bourne served as a member of the board of directors of Altus Midstream Company from November 2018 to August 2019. Mr. Bourne also served as a member of the board of directors and Vice President of Business Development — Marketing of Apache Corporation from April 2017 to August 2019. Prior to joining Apache Corporation, Mr. Bourne served as a consultant advising Smith Production Inc. Mr. Bourne served as Senior Vice President of Business Development at American Midstream GP LLC, the general partner of American Midstream Partners, LP from November 2014 until December 31, 2015. Mr. Bourne has more than 30 years of experience in midstream corporate business development focused on producer and end-user relations, and was one of the founding members of the executive management team for Coral Energy. |
Craig W. Collins Houston, Texas Officer since: August 2019 | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Collins has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of our general partner since August 2019. Mr. Collins served as Vice President, Midstream of Occidental from June 2019 through December 2019. In that role, Mr. Collins was responsible for leading Occidental’s midstream operations business unit. From April 2018 to April 2019, Mr. Collins served as Vice President and Chief Operating Officer — Midstream, of Alta Mesa Resources, Inc., which filed a petition under the federal bankruptcy laws in September 2019. From February 2017 to April 2018, Mr. Collins served as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the general partner and the general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP (now WES Operating) (“Western Gas”). Mr. Collins previously served as Director of Midstream Engineering for Anadarko from July 2016 to February 2017, during which time he was responsible for the engineering and construction of midstream infrastructure for Anadarko and Western Gas. Mr. Collins joined Anadarko in 2003 and served in several roles of increasing responsibility in Anadarko’s Treasury, Corporate Development, and Midstream groups. |
182
Christopher B. Dial Houston, Texas Officer since: December 2019 | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Dial has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of our general partner since December 2019. Prior to joining WES, Mr. Dial served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Chief Compliance Officer of the general partner of American Midstream Partners, LP from January 2018 to September 2019. Prior to joining American Midstream Partners, LP, Mr. Dial served as General Counsel of Susser Holdings II, L.P. after spending over eight years in a number of roles, most recently as Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, with both Susser Holdings Corporation and Sunoco LP. Mr. Dial began his career as an attorney for Andrews Kurth, LLP, representing clients on a variety of corporate, capital markets, and other transactional matters. |
Catherine A. Green Houston, Texas Officer since: October 2019 | Biography/Qualifications Ms. Green has served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of our general partner since October 2019. Ms. Green joined Anadarko in 2001 and has more than 20 years of accounting and audit experience. During her 18 years at Anadarko, Ms. Green has served in a variety of diverse roles throughout the Anadarko accounting and finance organization, including internal audit, technical U.S. GAAP accounting, internal controls, and most recently as Director, Expenditure Accounting. Prior to joining Anadarko, Ms. Green was an auditor with Grant Thornton LLP in the United Kingdom and Houston. |
Charles G. Griffie Houston, Texas Officer since: October 2019 | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Griffie has served as Senior Vice President, Operations and Engineering since October 2019. Mr. Griffie was named Senior Vice President, U.S. Onshore Field Operations of Anadarko in November 2018. Prior to this role, Mr. Griffie served as Senior Vice President, Midstream and Marketing at Huntley & Huntley Energy Exploration from June 2016 to November 2018. From 2006 through June 2016, Mr. Griffie held various operational leadership positions at Anadarko, including as General Manager U.S. Onshore Business Advisor, Eagleford Operations Manager, Appalachian Basin Midstream Manager, and Director of Midstream Engineering. Mr. Griffie joined Anadarko through its acquisition of Western Gas Resources, Inc. |
Robin H. Fielder Houston, Texas Director from: November 2018 to August 2019 Not Independent Officer from: November 2018 to August 2019 | Biography/Qualifications Ms. Fielder served as President and Director of our general partner from November 2018 to August 2019, and as Chief Executive Officer of our general partner from January 2019 to August 2019. Ms. Fielder also served as Senior Vice President, Midstream of Anadarko from November 2018 to August 2019. Prior to these positions, Ms. Fielder served in positions of increasing responsibility at Anadarko, including Vice President, Investor Relations from September 2016 to November 2018, Midstream Corporate Planning Manager from December 2015 to September 2016, Director, Investor Relations from June 2014 to December 2015, and General Manager, Carthage/North Louisiana from June 2013 to June 2014. Prior to serving in these roles, Ms. Fielder held various exploration and operations engineering positions at Anadarko in both the U.S. onshore and the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. |
Jaime R. Casas Houston, Texas Officer from: May 2017 to October 2019 | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Casas served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of our general partner from May 2017 to October 2019. Mr. Casas also served as Vice President, Finance of Anadarko from May 2017 to October 2019. Mr. Casas has served as Vice President and Treasurer of Occidental since October 2019. Prior to joining WES, Mr. Casas served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. from October 2016 until the company’s sale in April 2017. Previously, Mr. Casas served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of LRR Energy, L.P., a publicly traded exploration and production master limited partnership, from 2011 to October 2015, and as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Laredo Energy, a privately held oil and gas company, from 2009 to 2011. Prior to joining Laredo Energy, Mr. Casas worked for over a decade in various positions and industry groups in the investment banking divisions at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, and Credit Suisse. |
183
Steven D. Arnold Houston, Texas Director since: February 2019 Independent | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Arnold has served as a director of our general partner and as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors since February 2019. Mr. Arnold served as a director of the general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP (now WES Operating) and as a member of that board’s Special Committee and Audit Committee from February 2014 through February 2019. Mr. Arnold served on the board of directors of the general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP from 2007 to December 2013, during which time Mr. Arnold served on that board’s Audit Committee and Conflicts Committee. Mr. Arnold served as Chairman of each of those committees at separate times during his board membership. Mr. Arnold is engaged in private investment management and consulting services in Houston, Texas, through 3 Lights Management Co., serving as its President since inception in 2000. Mr. Arnold has over ten years of institutional investment management experience with Prudential Financial, Inc. Mr. Arnold brings strong risk assessment and strategic expertise to the Board. |
Marcia E. Backus Houston, Texas Director since: August 2019 Not Independent | Biography/Qualifications Ms. Backus has served as a director of our general partner’s Board of Directors since August 2019. She has served as General Counsel of Occidental since 2013, Senior Vice President since 2014, and Chief Compliance Officer since 2015. Ms. Backus is responsible for overseeing Occidental’s legal and compliance departments worldwide. Prior to joining Occidental, Ms. Backus was a partner at the law firm Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., heading the firm’s Energy Transactions/Projects Practice Group and serving in key leadership positions. |
Peter J. Bennett Houston, Texas Director since: August 2019 Not Independent | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Bennett has served as a director of our general partner’s Board of Directors since August 2019. Mr. Bennett has served as Senior Vice President, Permian Resources of Occidental Oil and Gas, a subsidiary of Occidental, since April 2018 and Vice President of Occidental since December 2016. In this role, Mr. Bennett is responsible for the operations, growth, and optimization strategy for all of Occidental’s Permian Resources business. Mr. Bennett previously served as President and General Manager — Permian Resources, New Mexico Delaware Basin, from January 2017 to April 2018, Chief Transformation Officer from June 2016 to January 2017, Vice President, Portfolio and Optimization of Occidental Oil and Gas from February 2016 to June 2016 and, prior to that, pioneered innovative logistical and operational solutions as Vice President, Operations Portfolio and Integrated Planning of Occidental Oil and Gas from October 2015 to February 2016. |
Oscar K. Brown Houston, Texas Director since: August 2019 Not Independent | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Brown has served as a director of our general partner’s Board of Directors since August 2019. Mr. Brown has served as Senior Vice President, Strategy, Business Development and Supply Chain of Occidental since November 2018. In this role, Mr. Brown is responsible for, among other things, Occidental’s global business development functions and global supply chain management. Mr. Brown previously served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Business Development from July 2017 to November 2018. Prior to joining Occidental in 2016, Mr. Brown worked at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, where he most recently served as managing director and co-head of Americas Energy Investment Banking. Mr. Brown served as Occidental’s designated representative on the board of directors of Plains All American Pipeline’s governing entity, PAA GP Holdings LLC (NYSE: PAA and PAGP) from August 2017 to September 2019. Mr. Brown also serves on the board of Houston’s Alley Theatre, and as a member of that board’s Executive Committee. |
James R. Crane Houston, Texas Director since: February 2019 Independent | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Crane has served as a director of our general partner and as a member of the Special Committee of the Board of Directors since February 2019. Mr. Crane served as a director of the general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP (now WES Operating) and as a member of that board’s Special Committee and Audit Committee from 2008 through February 2019. In 2011, Mr. Crane became the principal owner and Chairman of the Houston Astros Baseball Club. Mr. Crane also is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Crane Capital Group Inc., an investment management company he founded. Crane Capital Group currently invests in transportation, real estate, and asset management. Its holdings include Crane Worldwide Logistics, a premier global provider of customized transportation and logistics services with 100 offices in 29 countries. Prior to founding Crane Capital Group Inc., Mr. Crane was founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EGL, Inc., a global transportation, supply chain management, and information services company, from 1984 until its sale in 2007. Mr. Crane currently serves as a director of Nabors Industries Ltd., an international drilling contractor and well-services provider and Cargojet Inc., a Canadian cargo services company. From 2010 to February 2012, Mr. Crane served as a director of Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Health Care Service Corporation, and from 1999 to 2007 he served as a director of HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. |
184
Thomas R. Hix Houston, Texas Director since: January 2013 Independent | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Hix has served as a director of our general partner and as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors since January 2013. Mr. Hix has served as Chairman of the Audit Committee since August 2019 and served as Chairman of the Special Committee of the Board of Directors from January 2013 to August 2019. Mr. Hix has been a business consultant since 2003, and previously served as Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Cooper Cameron Corporation from 1995 to 2003. Prior to joining Cooper Cameron Corporation, Mr. Hix held several executive finance and accounting positions in the energy industry. Mr. Hix has significant expertise in finance and accounting and experience in mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Hix currently serves as a director of Ascent Resources, LLC, a privately owned exploration and production company focused on natural gas, oil, and NGLs in the Appalachian basin. Mr. Hix previously served as a director of Health Care Services Corporation from 2004 to November 2017, as a director of EP Energy Corporation from April 2014 to December 2017, as a director of El Paso Corporation from 2004 to May 2012, and as a director of Rowan Companies plc from 2009 to April 2019. |
Jennifer M. Kirk Houston, Texas Director since: August 2019 Not Independent | Biography/Qualifications Ms. Kirk has served as a director of our general partner’s Board of Directors since August 2019. She was appointed Senior Vice President, Integration, of Occidental in August 2019. In her current role, Ms. Kirk is responsible for overseeing the integration of Anadarko and facilitating Occidental’s achievement of its synergy targets. Prior to her current position with Occidental, Ms. Kirk served as Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of Occidental from 2014 to August 2019, and was responsible for the direct oversight of Occidental’s financial reporting, accounting, and internal controls functions. Ms. Kirk joined Occidental in 1999 and has served in financial roles of increasing responsibility and leadership. Prior to joining Occidental, Ms. Kirk was with Arthur Andersen, LLP. Ms. Kirk also serves on the board of directors of Republic Services, Inc., where she serves as chair of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Sustainability & Corporate Responsibility Committee. Ms. Kirk also serves on the boards of the Boys and Girls Club of the Greater Houston Area and the Houston Women’s Chamber. |
Craig W. Stewart Calgary, Alberta, Canada Director since: January 2013 Independent | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Stewart has served as a director of our general partner and as a member of the Special Committee of the Board of Directors since January 2013. Mr. Stewart also served on the Audit Committee of our general partner’s Board of Directors from January 2013 through August 2019. Mr. Stewart served as a director of RMP Energy Inc. from 2011 to May 2017, having served as its Executive Chairman from 2011 to January 2017, and as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of a predecessor entity, RMP Energy Ltd., from 2008 until 2011. Mr. Stewart served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Rider Resources Ltd. from 2003 to 2008, and prior to joining Rider Resources, held various executive and director positions with companies in the energy industry. |
David J. Tudor Houston, Texas Director since: December 2012 Independent | Biography/Qualifications Mr. Tudor has served as a director of our general partner and as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors since December 2012. Mr. Tudor has served as Chairman of the Special Committee of our general partner’s Board of Directors since August 2019 and served as Chairman of the Audit Committee from December 2012 through August 2019. Mr. Tudor also served as a director of the general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP (now WES Operating) and as Chairman of the Audit Committee of WES Operating’s board of directors from 2008 to February 2019, and as a member of the Special Committee of WES Operating’s board of directors from 2008 to December 2012. Since May 2016, Mr. Tudor has served as Chief Executive Officer and General Manager of Associated Electric Cooperative Inc., a member-owned, member-governed wholesale power provider serving Missouri, Iowa, and Oklahoma. From May 2013 to May 2016, Mr. Tudor served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Champion Energy Services, a retail electric provider. From 1999 through 2013, Mr. Tudor was the President and Chief Executive Officer of ACES, an Indianapolis-based commodity risk management company owned by 21 generation and transmission cooperatives throughout the United States. Prior to joining ACES, Mr. Tudor was the Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer of PG&E Energy Trading, where he managed commercial operations in the United States and Canada. |
185
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our general partner’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10 percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC, and any exchange or other system on which such securities are traded or quoted, initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common units, and other equity securities. Officers, directors, and greater-than-10-percent unitholders are required by the SEC’s regulations to furnish to us, and any exchange or other system on which such securities are traded or quoted, with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file with the SEC.
To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, we believe that all reporting obligations of our general partner’s officers, directors, and greater-than-10-percent unitholders under Section 16(a) were satisfied during the year ended December 31, 2019, except that on November 22, 2019, a late Form 4 was filed with respect to the purchase of 80,000 WES common units by Mr. Crane.
Reimbursement of Expenses of Our General Partner and Its Affiliates
Our general partner does not receive any management fee or other compensation for its management of WES. During 2019 under the WES omnibus agreement, we paid an annual general and administrative expense reimbursement of $250,000 and reimbursed Occidental for all insurance coverage expenses it incurred or payments it made on our behalf. Also during 2019, under WES Operating’s partnership agreement and WES Operating’s omnibus agreement, WES Operating reimbursed Occidental for general and administrative expenses allocated to it, as determined by Occidental in its reasonable discretion. On December 31, 2019, the WES and WES Operating omnibus agreements were terminated and replaced with the Services Agreement. Read Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding these agreements.
Board Committees
The Board of Directors has two standing committees: the Audit Committee and the Special Committee.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is comprised of three independent directors, Messrs. Hix (Chairman), Arnold, and Tudor, each of whom is able to understand fundamental financial statements and at least one of whom has past experience in accounting or related financial management experience. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent under the NYSE listing standards and the Exchange Act. In making the independence determination, the Board considered the requirements of the NYSE and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Audit Committee held five meetings in 2019.
Mr. Hix has been designated by the Board of Directors as the “Audit Committee financial expert” meeting the requirements promulgated by the SEC based upon his education and employment experience as more fully detailed in Mr. Hix’s biography set forth above.
The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of the integrity of the consolidated financial statements, internal control over financial reporting, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and the policies and controls of WES and WES Operating. The Audit Committee has the sole authority to, among other things, (i) retain and terminate our independent registered public accounting firm, (ii) approve all auditing services and related fees and the terms thereof performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, and (iii) establish policies and procedures for the pre-approval of all audit, audit-related, non-audit, and tax services to be rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee is also responsible for confirming the independence and objectivity of our independent registered public accounting firm. Our independent registered public accounting firm has been given unrestricted access to the Audit Committee and to our management, as necessary.
186
Special Committee. The Special Committee is comprised of three independent directors, Messrs. Tudor (Chairman), Crane, and Stewart. The Special Committee reviews specific matters that the Board believes may involve conflicts of interest (including certain transactions with Occidental). The Special Committee will determine, as set forth in our partnership agreement, if the resolution of a conflict of interest submitted to it is fair and reasonable to us. The members of the Special Committee are not officers or employees of our general partner or directors, officers, or employees of its affiliates, including Occidental. Our partnership agreement provides that any matters approved in good faith by the Special Committee will be conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to us, approved by all of our partners, and not a breach by our general partner of any duties it may owe us or our unitholders. The Special Committee held three meetings during 2019.
Meeting of Non-Management Directors and Communications with Directors
At each quarterly meeting of our Board of Directors, all of our independent directors meet in an executive session without management participation or participation by non-independent directors. Mr. Tudor, the Chairman of the Special Committee, presides over these executive sessions.
The Board of Directors welcomes questions or comments about WES and its operations. Unitholders or interested parties may contact the Board of Directors, including any individual director, at BoardofDirectors@westernmidstream.com or at the following address and fax number: Name of the Director(s), c/o Secretary, Western Midstream Holdings, LLC, 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380, (832) 636-6001.
Code of Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and Board Committee Charters
Our general partner has adopted a Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers (the “Code of Ethics”), which applies to our general partner’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, principal accounting officer, Controller, and all other senior financial and accounting officers of our general partner. If the general partner amends the Code of Ethics or grants a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from the Code of Ethics, we will disclose the information on our website. Our general partner has also adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that outline the important policies and practices regarding our governance and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all employees of Occidental or affiliates of Occidental who perform services for us and our general partner.
We make available free of charge, within the “Governance” section of our website at www.westernmidstream.com, and in print to any unitholder who so requests, our Code of Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Audit Committee charter, and Special Committee charter. Requests for print copies may be directed to investors@westernmidstream.com or to: Investor Relations, Western Midstream Partners, LP, 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380, or telephone (832) 636-6000. The information contained on, or connected to, our website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this or any other report that we file with or furnish to the SEC.
187
Item 11. Executive Compensation
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Overview
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we did not directly employ any of the persons responsible for managing our business. Rather, until December 31, 2019, all of the employees, including executive officers, who managed our business were employed by Occidental (or, prior to the Occidental Merger, by Anadarko) and their respective subsidiaries other than us. In addition, our general partner’s Board of Directors does not have a compensation committee. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the compensation of Anadarko’s and Occidental’s employees that perform services on our behalf, including our general partner’s executive officers, was approved by Anadarko’s and Occidental’s management. For the year ended December 31, 2019, our reimbursement to Anadarko and Occidental for the compensation of executive officers was governed by our omnibus agreement. Under our partnership agreement and our omnibus agreement, for the year ended December 31, 2019, we reimbursed general and administrative expenses as determined by Anadarko and Occidental in their reasonable discretion. Read the caption Shared services agreements under Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K.
Our general partner’s “named executive officers” for 2019 were Robin H. Fielder (the principal executive officer through August 7, 2019), Michael P. Ure (the principal executive officer effective August 8, 2019), Jaime R. Casas (the principal financial officer and principal accounting officer through October 16, 2019), Michael C. Pearl (the principal financial officer effective October 17, 2019), Craig W. Collins (the principal operating officer effective August 8, 2019), Robert W. Bourne (Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer effective October 17, 2019), Charles G. Griffie (Senior Vice President, Operations and Engineering effective October 17, 2019), and John D. Montanti (Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary through December 13, 2019). With respect to the executive officers who, during their periods of service as executive officers of our general partner, were not fully dedicated to our business, compensation paid or awarded by us in 2019 reflects only the portion of compensation expense that was allocated to us pursuant to Anadarko’s and Occidental’s allocation methodology, as described below, and subject to the terms of our omnibus agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2019, Anadarko and Occidental had the ultimate decision-making authority with respect to the total compensation of the named executive officers and, subject to the terms of our omnibus agreement, the portion of such compensation we reimbursed pursuant to Anadarko’s and Occidental’s allocation methodology. Generally, once Anadarko and Occidental had established the total aggregate amount the named executive officers were eligible to be paid or awarded with respect to each element of compensation, such aggregate amount was then multiplied by a time allocation percentage for each named executive officer. Each allocation percentage was established based on a periodic, good-faith estimate made by each named executive officer and was subject to review by the Chairman of our general partner’s Board of Directors. The resulting amount (other than with respect to certain long-term incentive plan awards) was the amount that we reimbursed Anadarko and Occidental for pursuant to the terms of our omnibus agreement, and such amount appears in the Summary Compensation Table below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, perquisites were not allocated to us, and reimbursement of annual bonus amounts under the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table were capped consistent with the methodology used for all employees whose compensation was allocated to us for 2019 and as set forth in the Services Agreement entered into between Occidental, Anadarko, and WES Operating GP. For additional information about the Services Agreement, read the caption Services and secondment agreement under Part III, Item 13 of this Form 10-K.
188
The following table presents the estimated percentages of time (“time allocation”) that the general partner’s named executive officers devoted to us during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, which percentages represent the time devoted to the business of the Partnership relative to the aggregate time devoted to the businesses of the Partnership on one hand and Anadarko or Occidental on the other hand:
Named Executive Officers of Our General Partner | Time Allocation | Occidental Corporate Officer | ||
Michael P. Ure (1) | 90% | Yes | ||
Michael C. Pearl (1) | 100% | No | ||
Craig W. Collins (1) | 100% | No | ||
Robert W. Bourne (1) | 100% | No | ||
Charles G. Griffie (1) | 100% | No | ||
Robin H. Fielder | 75% | No | ||
Jaime R. Casas | 70% | Yes | ||
John D. Montanti | 70% | No |
(1) | Based upon their respective appointment dates, the full-year 2019 prorated allocation percentages for Messrs. Ure, Pearl, Collins, Bourne, and Griffie are as follows: 35% for Mr. Ure, 40% for Mr. Pearl, 40% for Mr. Collins, 40% for Mr. Bourne, and 20% for Mr. Griffie. Compensation amounts shown herein for these named executive officers do not include compensation that was paid or awards that were granted by Anadarko or Occidental prior to the named executive officer’s commencement of service with us. |
The following discussion relating to compensation paid by Anadarko and Occidental is based on information provided to us by Occidental and does not purport to be a complete discussion and analysis of Anadarko’s and Occidental’s executive compensation philosophy and practices. For a more complete analysis of the compensation programs and philosophies used at Occidental, read Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained within Occidental’s proxy statement, which is expected to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2019. The elements of compensation discussed below for 2019 (and the decisions of Anadarko and Occidental with respect to the levels of such compensation) were not subject to approvals by our Board of Directors, including the Audit or Special Committee thereof.
Effective for the beginning of the fiscal year 2020, the employment of all of our current named executive officers has been transferred to a subsidiary of the Partnership on substantially the same terms and conditions of employment as applied immediately prior to the transfer. As a result, going forward, any changes to compensation terms for our named executive officers, such as changes in base salary, target bonus amounts, or perquisites will be determined by the Board of Directors of our general partner, or a committee that our Board of Directors may establish for such purposes, and our Board of Directors (or a committee thereof) will be responsible for determining the terms and amounts of any new compensation awards, including annual cash incentives and long-term incentive awards.
Elements of Compensation
For 2019, the principal elements of compensation for the named executive officers were as follows:
• | base salary; |
• | annual cash incentives; |
• | equity-based compensation, which, prior to the Occidental Merger, included equity-based compensation under Anadarko’s 2012 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated (the “Omnibus Plan”), for former Anadarko employees and Occidental’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Occidental LTIP Plan”) for former Occidental employees; |
• | retention awards for certain of our named executive officers; however, we will not bear any costs associated with such awards; and |
• | certain other benefits that were provided on the same basis to other eligible Anadarko and Occidental employees, including welfare and retirement benefits, severance and change of control benefits, and other benefits. |
189
Base salary. Base salaries provide a fixed level of income for our named executive officers based on their level of responsibility (which for 2019 may or may not have been fully related to our business), their relative expertise and experience, and in some cases their potential for advancement. As discussed above, for 2019, a portion of the base salaries of our named executive officers was allocated to us based on Anadarko’s and Occidental’s methodology used for allocating general and administrative expenses. As of January 1, 2020, we will be fully responsible for paying base salaries for our named executive officers. The current base salary for each of our current named executive officers is set forth in the following table:
Named Executive Officers | Base Salary (Unallocated) | |||
Michael P. Ure | $ | 650,000 | ||
Michael C. Pearl | 455,000 | |||
Craig W. Collins | 455,000 | |||
Robert W. Bourne | 405,000 | |||
Charles G. Griffie | 405,000 |
Annual cash incentives (bonuses). Our named executive officers are eligible to receive annual cash awards to be paid in 2020 for their performance during the year ended December 31, 2019. Annual cash incentive awards were used by Anadarko and Occidental to motivate their executives and employees, reward them for the achievement of objectives aligned with value creation, and/or recognize individual contributions to performance. These awards put a portion of an executive’s compensation at risk by linking potential annual compensation to Anadarko’s and Occidental’s achievement of specific operational, financial, and safety performance metrics during the year. For 2019, the annual bonuses paid to our named executive officers are determined pursuant to the annual incentive plans of Anadarko and Occidental or, for Messrs. Pearl and Griffie, were fixed according to the Occidental Merger Agreement.
The portion of annual cash awards allocable to us is based on the periods of service during which the named executive officers provided services to us in 2019, but subject to a limitation of 120% of the target bonus amount for each named executive officer. Annual bonuses are generally paid during the first quarter of each calendar year for the prior year’s performance. Beginning with the 2020 annual performance year, we will be fully responsible for paying any annual bonus awards for our named executive officers. For 2020, the target level annual bonus award opportunity for each of our current named executive officers, measured as a percentage of base salary, is set forth in the following table, and the actual amount of any annual bonus awards will be determined pursuant to annual incentive programs that we expect to establish:
Named Executive Officers | Bonus Opportunity (Unallocated) | ||
Michael P. Ure | 100 | % | |
Michael C. Pearl | 86 | % | |
Craig W. Collins | 86 | % | |
Robert W. Bourne | 81 | % | |
Charles G. Griffie | 85 | % |
Long-term incentive awards. Prior to the Occidental Merger, Anadarko periodically made equity-based awards under the Omnibus Plan to align the interests of its executive officers and employees with those of its stockholders and, likewise, Occidental made equity-based awards under the Occidental LTIP Plan. For 2019, the annual equity awards generally consisted of a combination of performance units and time-based restricted stock awards and units. This award structure was intended to provide a combination of equity-based vehicles that are performance-based in absolute and relative terms while also encouraging retention. The costs allocated to us for the named executive officers’ compensation includes an allocation of expenses associated with a portion of these awards in accordance with the allocation mechanisms in our omnibus agreement.
Going forward, our general partner may grant equity and other long-term incentive awards in us, including awards that may be granted pursuant to the LTIPs, under such plans and programs and with terms and conditions and in amounts as the Board of Directors of our general partner (or a committee thereof) may establish and determine from time to time.
190
Retention awards. In 2019, to encourage retention and dedication of certain of our named executive officers to our business, Occidental granted certain cash retention award opportunities. Messrs. Pearl and Griffie were granted a retention award of $783,000 and $684,000, respectively. These retention awards will be paid ratably, subject to the continued employment of Messrs. Pearl and Griffie, on the following anniversary dates: February 8, 2020, August 8, 2020, and February 8, 2021. To the extent earned, the retention awards will be payable by Occidental or one of its subsidiaries other than us. Pursuant to the Services Agreement, we will not be responsible for the cost of these retention awards.
Other benefits. In addition to the compensation elements discussed above, Anadarko and Occidental also maintained other benefits for our named executive officers, including the following:
• | retirement benefits to match competitive industry practices, including participation in a savings plan, savings restoration plan, retirement plan, and retirement restoration plan; |
• | severance benefits, as described below under the heading Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control; |
• | director indemnification agreements; |
• | a limited number of perquisites, including financial counseling, tax preparation and estate planning, an executive physical program, management life insurance, voluntary participation in deferred compensation plans, and personal excess liability insurance; and |
• | certain benefits that are also provided to all other eligible U.S.-based employees, including medical, dental, vision, flexible spending and health savings accounts, paid time off, life insurance, and disability coverage. |
For a more detailed summary of Occidental’s executive compensation program and the benefits provided thereunder, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of Occidental’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of 2019 stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2019.
Role of Executive Officers in Executive Compensation
For 2019, Occidental’s management determined, and, prior to the Occidental Merger, Anadarko’s management determined the compensation for each of our named executive officers. The Board of Directors determines compensation for the independent, non-management directors of our Board of Directors, and any grants made under the LTIPs. None of our named executive officers provided compensation recommendations regarding compensation (other than recommendations with respect to employees that report directly to them).
Compensation Mix
We believe that the mix of base salary, cash, equity-based awards, and other Anadarko and Occidental compensation fit overall compensation objectives for the named executive officers. We believe this mix of compensation provides competitive compensation opportunities to align and drive employee performance in support of our business strategies and Occidental’s, and to attract, motivate, and retain high-quality talent with the skills and competencies required by us and Occidental.
191
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As noted above, for 2019, we did not directly employ any of the persons responsible for managing or operating our business and we have no compensation committee. Instead, we are managed by our general partner, the executive officers of which, during 2019, were employees of Anadarko and Occidental. For 2019, our reimbursement for the compensation of our executive officers is governed by the omnibus agreement and the Services Agreement.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation amounts expensed by us for our named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, as applicable. Except as specifically noted, the amounts included in the table below reflect the portion of the expense allocated to us by Anadarko and Occidental. For a discussion of the allocation percentages in effect for 2019, see the Overview section, above.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) (1) | Stock Awards ($) (2) | Option Awards ($) (3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (4) | All Other Compensation ($) (5) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||
Michael P. Ure | 2019 | 147,981 | 1,080,029 | — | 162,000 | 43,252 | 1,433,262 | |||||||||||||
President and | 2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Robin H. Fielder | 2019 | 223,846 | — | — | — | 54,494 | 278,340 | |||||||||||||
Former President and | 2018 | 23,019 | 384,963 | 201,309 | 21,313 | 5,905 | 636,509 | |||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Michael C. Pearl | 2019 | 167,308 | — | — | 160,615 | 41,909 | 369,832 | |||||||||||||
Senior Vice President and | 2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Jaime R. Casas | 2019 | 281,942 | — | — | — | 69,281 | 351,223 | |||||||||||||
Former Senior Vice President, Chief | 2018 | 348,577 | 1,650,799 | 392,547 | 271,890 | 89,029 | 2,752,842 | |||||||||||||
Financial Officer and Treasurer | 2017 | 208,731 | 1,257,309 | 904,934 | 135,675 | 71,607 | 2,578,256 | |||||||||||||
Charles G. Griffie | 2019 | 73,077 | 208,008 | — | 70,154 | 18,360 | 369,599 | |||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, Operations | 2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
and Engineering | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Craig W. Collins | 2019 | 138,462 | 500,049 | — | 168,000 | 25,826 | 832,337 | |||||||||||||
Senior Vice President and | 2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Chief Operating Officer | 2017 | 146,827 | 1,029,025 | 279,272 | 91,209 | 49,090 | 1,595,423 | |||||||||||||
Robert W. Bourne | 2019 | 136,500 | 1,250,029 | — | 154,932 | 10,680 | 1,552,141 | |||||||||||||
Senior Vice President and | 2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Chief Commercial Officer | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
John D. Montanti | 2019 | 209,794 | 156,139 | — | — | 52,149 | 418,082 | |||||||||||||
Former Vice President, General | 2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Counsel and Corporate Secretary | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
(1) | The amounts in this column reflect the base salary compensation allocated to us by Anadarko and Occidental for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017. Amounts for Messrs. Ure, Pearl, Collins, Bourne, and Griffie for the year ended December 31, 2019, reflect base salary compensation earned and allocated since their appointments as officers of our general partner. |
(2) | The amounts in this column reflect an allocation to us of the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (without respect to the risk of forfeitures), for non-option stock awards granted pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. The value ultimately realized upon the actual vesting of the award(s) may or may not be equal to this determined value. For Messrs. Griffie and Montanti, their awards represent a grant prior to the acquisition of Anadarko by Occidental on August 8, 2019. For a discussion of valuation assumptions for the awards under the Omnibus Plan, see Note 14—Stock-Based Incentive Plans in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8 of Occidental’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (which is not, and shall not be deemed to be, incorporated by reference herein). For information regarding the non-option stock awards granted to the named executives in 2019, see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2019 table. The amounts in this column also reflect the allocation of performance unit awards, where such gross amounts were subject to market conditions and have been valued based on the probable outcome of the market conditions as of the grant date. |
192
(3) | The amounts in this column reflect the expected allocation to us of the grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (without respect to the risk of forfeitures), for option awards granted pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. See note (2) above for valuation assumptions. The value ultimately realized upon the exercise of the stock option(s) may or may not be equal to this determined value. |
(4) | The amounts in this column reflect annual cash bonus compensation expected to be allocated to us for the year ended December 31, 2019, and the amounts allocated to us for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. |
(5) | The amounts in this column reflect the compensation expenses related to Anadarko’s and Occidental’s retirement and savings plans that were allocated to us for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017. Amounts for Messrs. Ure, Pearl, Collins, Bourne, and Griffie for the year ended December 31, 2019, reflect expenses allocated since their appointments as officers of our general partner. The 2019 allocated expenses are detailed in the table below: |
Name | Retirement Plans Expense | Savings Plans Expense | ||||||
Michael P. Ure | $ | — | $ | 43,252 | ||||
Robin H. Fielder | 27,381 | 27,113 | ||||||
Michael C. Pearl | 23,310 | 18,599 | ||||||
Jaime R. Casas | 35,222 | 34,059 | ||||||
Charles G. Griffie | 10,485 | 7,875 | ||||||
Craig W. Collins | — | 25,826 | ||||||
Robert W. Bourne | — | 10,680 | ||||||
John D. Montanti | 27,736 | 24,413 |
193
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2019
The following table sets forth information concerning annual incentive awards, stock options, phantom units, shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units granted during 2019 to each of the named executive officers. Except for amounts in the column entitled Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards, the dollar amounts and number of securities included in the table below reflect an allocation based upon each named executive officer’s allocation of time to our business.
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) (3) | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael P. Ure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | 135,000 | 162,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/15/2019 | 2,299 | 9,197 | 18,394 | 540,023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/15/2019 | 8,037 | 540,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael C. Pearl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | 133,846 | 160,615 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charles G. Griffie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | 58,462 | 70,154 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/12/2019 | 4,860 | 208,008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Craig W. Collins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | 140,000 | 168,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/30/2019 | 9,633 | 500,049 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Bourne | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | 129,110 | 154,932 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
08/09/2019 | 26,523 | 1,250,029 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John D. Montanti | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
03/12/2019 | 3,564 | 156,139 |
(1) | Reflects the estimated 2019 annual cash incentive payouts allocable to us. If threshold levels of performance are not met, then the payout can be zero. The maximum value reflects the maximum amount allocable to us consistent with the methodologies set forth in the Services Agreement. The expense expected to be allocated to us for the actual bonus payouts under the annual incentive program for 2019 is reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. |
(2) | Reflects, as of the time of grant, the estimated future payout allocable to us under performance units awarded in 2019. Mr. Ure is eligible to earn from 0% to 200% of the targeted award based on Occidental’s relative total shareholder return performance over a three-year performance period. The threshold value represents the minimum payment (other than zero) that was eligible to be earned. |
(3) | Reflects the allocable number of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units awarded in 2019 under the Omnibus Plan for Messrs. Griffie and Montanti and the Occidental LTIP Plan for Messrs. Ure, Collins, and Bourne, respectively. For Messrs. Griffie and Montanti, their awards represent a grant prior to the acquisition of Anadarko by Occidental on August 8, 2019. Mr. Ure’s award vests ratably on each February 28, 2020, 2021, and 2022. For Messrs. Collins, Bourne, and Montanti, these awards were eligible to vest ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date. Mr. Griffie’s awards will fully vest four years from the grant date. |
(4) | The amounts included in the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards column represent the expected allocation to us of the grant date fair value of the awards at the time of grant made to named executives in 2019 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value ultimately realized by the executive upon the actual vesting of the award(s) or the exercise of the stock option(s) may or may not be equal to the determined value. For a discussion of valuation assumptions for the awards under the Omnibus Plan and the Occidental LTIP Plan, see Note 14-Stock-Based Incentive Plans in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of Occidental’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (which is not, and shall not be deemed to be, incorporated by reference herein). There were no grants of stock options in 2019. |
194
Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End 2019
The following table reflects outstanding equity awards for each of the named executive officers as of December 31, 2019, including awards under the Omnibus Plan and Occidental LTIP Plan. As of December 31, 2019, none of our named executive officers have any outstanding awards under the LTIPs. The market values shown are based on Occidental’s closing stock price of $41.21 on December 31, 2019, unless otherwise noted. Except for amounts in the column entitled Option Exercise Price, the dollar amounts and number of securities included in the table below reflect an allocation based upon each officer’s estimated allocation of time to our business during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. The awards listed below represent those for which expense is being allocated to the Partnership, but as described elsewhere, the Partnership is not reimbursing Occidental in cash for such awards. On August 8, 2019, all outstanding Anadarko restricted stock units and stock options were converted pursuant to the terms of the Occidental Merger Agreement for Messrs. Pearl and Griffie. Their respective amounts shown here represent that conversion.
Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Incentive Plan Awards Performance Units (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Shares/Units (2) | Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Option Awards (1) | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable (#) | Unexercisable (#) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael P. Ure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/11/2015 | 2,700 | — | 79.98 | 02/11/2022 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
02/15/2017 | — | — | — | — | 1,786 | 73,601 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
02/07/2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,686 | 69,480 | ||||||||||||||||
02/07/2018 | — | — | — | — | 4,294 | 176,956 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
02/15/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,299 | 94,742 | ||||||||||||||||
02/15/2019 | — | — | — | — | 8,037 | 331,205 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Michael C. Pearl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/10/2016 | — | — | — | — | 1,875 | 77,269 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
11/14/2017 | — | — | — | — | 220 | 9,066 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
11/15/2018 | — | — | — | — | 411 | 16,937 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Charles G. Griffie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/28/2018 | — | — | — | — | 2,160 | 89,014 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
11/28/2018 | — | — | — | — | 150 | 6,182 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
02/12/2019 | — | — | — | — | 1,470 | 60,579 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Craig W. Collins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/30/2019 | — | — | — | — | 9,633 | 396,976 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Bourne | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
08/09/2019 | — | — | — | — | 26,523 | 1,093,013 | — | — |
195
(1) | Stock options have a seven-year term and will vest ratably over three years in equal installments on the first, second, and third anniversaries of the date of grant. Stock option awards do not accrue dividends or dividend equivalents. |
(2) | Generally, the restricted stock units will vest ratably over three years in installments on the first, second, and third anniversaries of the grant date. Mr. Ure’s 2017 restricted stock units will fully vest on February 28, 2020, his 2018 restricted stock units vested on February 28, 2019, and the remaining unvested portion will vest ratably on February 28, 2020 and 2021. One-third of Mr. Ure’s February 2019 restricted stock units will vest on February 28, 2020, 2021, and 2022. Messrs. Pearl’s and Griffie’s restricted stock units granted on November 10, 2016, and February 12, 2019, respectively, vest four years from the grant date. At the end of each vesting period, unless deferred, the number of restricted stock units that vest are settled in shares of unrestricted Occidental common stock, less applicable withholding taxes. For restricted stock units, dividend equivalents are accrued and reinvested in additional shares of common stock, less applicable withholding taxes. Pursuant to the Occidental Merger Agreement, each outstanding award of restricted stock units converted into a restricted stock and cash unit award of Occidental. Respectively, Messrs. Pearl and Griffie have the following cash portions outstanding as of December 31, 2019, that will vest ratably three years in installments on the first, second, and third anniversary of the grant date; Messrs. Pearl’s and Griffie’s award granted on November 10, 2016, and February 12, 2019, respectively, vests four years from grant date: |
Named Executive Officers | Cash Portions Outstanding | |||
Michael C. Pearl | ||||
11/10/2016 | $ | 369,842 | ||
11/14/2017 | 81,154 | |||
11/15/2018 | 43,498 | |||
Charles G. Griffie | ||||
11/28/2018 | 29,723 | |||
11/28/2018 | 426,104 | |||
02/12/2019 | 289,901 |
(3) | The number of outstanding performance units and the estimated payout percentages disclosed for each award, for Mr. Ure, are calculated based on Occidental’s relative performance ranking as of December 31, 2019, and are not necessarily indicative of what the payout percent earned will be at the end of each three-year performance period. The three-year performance period generally starts in January in the year of grant and ends on December 31, 2020 and 2021 for 2018 and 2019 grants, respectively. Occidental’s relative performance rankings as of December 31, 2019 were 0% for the February 2018 and the February 2019 grants. For Mr. Ure’s award granted in February 2017 with a performance period beginning in 2019, the performance unit award is not outstanding as the award paid out at 0%. For Messrs. Pearl and Griffie, all outstanding performance units immediately vested on August 8, 2019, as provided under the terms of the Occidental Merger Agreement, and are not allocable to the Partnership. |
196
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2019
The following table reflects Anadarko and Occidental option awards exercised in 2019 and Anadarko and Occidental stock awards that vested in 2019 to the extent allocable to us. The dollar amounts and number of securities included in the table below reflect an allocation based upon each officer’s allocation of time to our business.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) (1) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) (1) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) (2) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) (2) | ||||||||
Michael P. Ure | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Robin H. Fielder | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Michael C. Pearl | — | — | 583 | 22,607 | ||||||||
Jaime R. Casas | — | — | 920 | 35,249 | ||||||||
Charles G. Griffie | — | — | 327 | 12,653 | ||||||||
Craig W. Collins | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Robert W. Bourne | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
John D. Montanti | — | — | 669 | 41,331 |
(1) | Shares acquired and values realized on exercise include options exercised in 2019. The amounts shown in the Value Realized on Exercise column represent the difference between the market price of common stock at exercise and the applicable exercise price of such option(s). The actual value ultimately realized by the named executive officer may be more or less than the realized value calculated in the above table depending on the timing in which the named executive officer held or sold the stock associated with the exercise. Pursuant to the Occidental Merger Agreement, for Messrs. Pearl, Griffie, and Casas and Ms. Fielder, each outstanding stock option was canceled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash and was not allocable to the Partnership. |
(2) | Shares acquired and values realized on vesting reflect the taxable value to the named executive officer as of the date of the vesting in 2019 of shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units, performance units, or phantom units. For each named executive officer, the amount shown in the Value Realized on Vesting column represents the aggregate number of restricted stock units or shares of restricted stock held by such named executive officer that vested during 2019 multiplied by the common stock price on the applicable vesting date(s). For shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units, the actual value ultimately realized by the named executive officer may be more or less than the value realized calculated in the above table depending on the timing in which the named executive officer held or sold the stock associated with the exercise or vesting occurrence. Mr. Ure’s shares acquired and values realized were incurred in early 2019 before becoming an executive officer of the Partnership and were never allocable to the Partnership. |
Pension Benefits for 2019
Occidental does not have a defined benefit pension plan that provides named executive officers a fixed monthly retirement payment. Instead, all salaried employees on the U.S. dollar payroll, including the named executive officers, are eligible to participate in one or more tax-qualified defined contribution plans. Under the omnibus agreement, a portion of the annual expense related to these plans is reimbursed by us to Occidental. The allocated expense for each named executive officer is included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. We have not included a pension benefits table as Occidental does not allocate expense to us upon an employee’s retirement and the subsequent payment of benefits under such pension plans. For additional discussion of Occidental’s pension benefits, read Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Indirect Compensation Elements — Retirement Benefits contained within Occidental’s proxy statement for its 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2019.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2019
Occidental maintains two nonqualified deferred compensation plans: (i) the Supplemental Retirement Plan II (the “SRP II”), and (ii) the Modified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “MDCP”). The purpose of the SRP II is to provide eligible employees, including the named executive officers, with benefits to compensate them for maximum limits imposed by law on the amount of contributions that may be made to Occidental’s tax-qualified defined contribution plans. The purpose of the MDCP is to provide key management and highly compensated employees the ability to accumulate additional retirement income through deferrals of compensation.
197
Pursuant to the terms of the omnibus agreement, a portion of the expense related to these plans is reimbursed by us to Occidental. The allocated expense for each named executive officer is included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. We have not included a nonqualified deferred compensation table as Occidental does not allocate expense to us upon distribution of such balances. For additional discussion on Occidental’s nonqualified deferred compensation benefits, read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Other Compensation and Benefits section contained within Occidental’s proxy statement for its 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2019.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
Prior to entry into the Services Agreement on December 31, 2019, in the event of a change of control of the general partner or Occidental, we would not be responsible for paying any change of control benefits to our named executive officers. As of December 31, 2019, none of our named executive officers have any outstanding awards under the LTIPs.
Prior to December 31, 2019, we did not have any employment agreements with our named executive officers. However, during 2019, our named executive officers were eligible for certain severance and termination pay benefits under plans and programs maintained by Anadarko and Occidental. In connection with the Occidental Merger, Ms. Fielder and Mr. Montanti terminated employment with Anadarko and Occidental and received certain benefits under these arrangements. Such arrangements were not intended as compensation for services to us and we did not incur any costs associated with those payments.
The severance and termination pay arrangements of Anadarko included, for Messrs. Pearl and Griffie, a key employee change of control contract, pursuant to which the executive would be entitled to enhanced severance benefits in the event of an involuntary termination of employment without cause or resignation for good reason following a change of control of Anadarko (the “Anadarko COC Agreements”). The Occidental Merger constituted a change of control of Anadarko for purposes of these agreements. Upon an involuntary termination of employment without cause during the two-year period following the closing of the Occidental Merger, Messrs. Pearl and Griffie would be entitled to receive the following severance benefits under these agreements: (i) the aggregate amount set forth in the following sections (A) through (E) paid in cash lump sum within twenty days following the applicable executive’s date of termination, (A) an annual bonus, based on the higher of (x) the highest annual bonus earned by the applicable executive for the last three years prior to the change of control and (y) the annual bonus paid or payable for the most recently completed fiscal year, (B) two times the sum of the applicable executive’s annual base salary plus the highest annual bonus (as determined in clause (A)), (C) an amount equal to the total value due to the applicable executive under the savings restoration plan, (D) an amount equal to the matching contributions which would have been made on the executive’s behalf in the employee savings plan plus the amount the executive would have accrued under the savings restoration plan for the twenty-four month period following the applicable executive’s termination of employment, (E) an amount equal to the sum of (y) the applicable executive’s accrued retirement benefit payable under the retirement restoration plan and (z) any additional retirement benefits that the applicable executive would have accrued under the tax-qualified benefit plan in which the executive participates and the retirement restoration plan as if the executive continued employment for two years following the applicable executive’s date of termination, (ii) up to $30,000 in outplacement services, and (iii) continued life, accident, disability, medical and health care benefit coverage for two years following the applicable executive’s date of termination. In connection with their acceptance of the retention award opportunities described above under the heading “Retention bonuses,” Messrs. Pearl and Griffie waived their right to receive severance pay or benefits upon a resignation of employment for good reason or involuntary termination without cause.
The severance and termination pay arrangements of Anadarko also included the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Amended and Restated Change of Control Severance Plan, which was a broad-based plan covering substantially all of Anadarko’s employees who provided services to us and provided for enhanced severance benefits following a change of control of Anadarko (the “ Anadarko COC Plan”). The Anadarko COC Plan provided that eligible participants are entitled to certain severance benefits if (i)(A) the participant’s employment is terminated without cause by the participant’s employer or (B) if the participant terminates his or her employment within ninety days following the sale or disposition of the participant’s employer in which the participant was not offered substantially similar employment and compensation terms with the purchaser, in each case, within three years of a change of control or (ii) the participant resigns for good reason within one year following a change of control (all such terminations, a “Qualifying Termination”). Assuming there is a Qualifying Termination, the severance benefits upon termination under the Anadarko COC Plan include the following:
• | A cash lump sum equal to (A) 50% of the sum of (i) the participant’s monthly base salary plus (ii) the highest annual bonus received by the participant over the previous three years, divided by twelve, multiplied by the number of years of service by the participant (clauses (i) and (ii), “Monthly Compensation”) and (B) one month of Monthly Compensation for each $10,000 of annual compensation (base salary plus highest annual bonus), rounding up to the next highest whole multiple of $10,000 if the participant’s annual compensation is not a multiple of $10,000 (the “Severance Benefit”); |
• | Pro-rata annual bonus based on the participant’s target bonus percentage; and |
198
• | Continuation of medical and dental insurance coverage for up to six months following termination of employment. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing benefits, the minimum Severance Benefit under the Anadarko COC Plan is three times the Monthly Compensation and the maximum Severance Benefit is twenty-four times the Monthly Compensation.
In connection with the transfer of employment of our named executive officers to a subsidiary of WES on December 31, 2019, we assumed severance and termination pay obligations under the Anadarko COC Agreements and the Anadarko COC Plan. However, with respect to the employees of Anadarko who provided services to us, any compensation amounts arising as a result of the Occidental Merger are not intended as compensation for services to us. As a result, pursuant to the Services Agreement, Anadarko and Occidental will be responsible for all benefits under the Anadarko COC Agreements and the Anadarko COC Plan with respect to any employee (including named executive officers) to the extent such benefits exceed the greater of six months of the employee’s base salary or the amount of severance payments the employee would be entitled to receive under the formulas that were set forth in Anadarko’s applicable non-change of control severance plans. Further, the Services Agreement provides that we will not reimburse Occidental in cash for amounts related to the vesting of any outstanding equity or long-term incentive awards (whether vested, unvested, deferred, or otherwise) granted by Anadarko or Occidental to our named executive officers.
In addition, on December 31, 2019, to provide for uniformity in severance entitlements, our Board of Directors determined to extend the benefits under the Anadarko COC Plan to the named executive officers who were not employed with Anadarko prior to the Occidental Merger (which includes Messrs. Ure, Collins, and Bourne) for so long as the Anadarko COC Plan continues to apply for the former Anadarko employees who are now employed with us. For these named executive officers, we will be responsible for 100% of these broad-based severance payments and benefits available under the plan.
Unless otherwise noted, the amounts shown below are limited to amounts that would be payable by us under the Services Agreement and do not include amounts that would be paid, provided, or reimbursed to us by Anadarko or Occidental.
Involuntary Not For Cause Termination
Mr. Ure | Mr. Collins | Mr. Bourne | ||||||||||
Cash Severance (1) | $ | 2,825,000 | $ | 400,000 | $ | 390,000 | ||||||
Total | $ | 2,825,000 | $ | 400,000 | $ | 390,000 |
(1) | Pursuant to the terms of the Services Agreement, our liability for severance owed to Messrs. Collins and Bourne is capped at one year of base salary, which is the amount that would have been payable if such officers were subject to the Anadarko Officer Severance Plan. The amount above for Mr. Ure reflects the single-trigger broad-based rights extended to him under the Anadarko COC Plan, as such amount is not capped under the Services Agreement. Due to the waiver of certain change of control rights discussed above, Messrs. Pearl and Griffie do not have arrangements covering involuntary not-for-cause termination other than agreements with Occidental providing for the vesting of equity or acceleration of retention payments for which, in either case, we are not obligated under the Services Agreement. |
Change of Control: Involuntary Termination or Voluntary For Good Reason
Mr. Ure | Mr. Pearl | Mr. Collins | Mr. Bourne | Mr. Griffie | ||||||||||||||||
Cash Severance (1) | $ | 2,825,000 | $ | 435,000 | $ | 1,733,123 | $ | 1,297,110 | $ | 380,000 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,825,000 | $ | 435,000 | $ | 1,733,123 | $ | 1,297,110 | $ | 380,000 |
(1) | Pursuant to the terms of the Services Agreement, our liability for severance owed to Messrs. Pearl and Griffie is capped at one year of base salary, which is the amount that would have been payable if such officers were subject to the Anadarko Officer Severance Plan. Although the amounts payable to Messrs. Ure, Collins, and Bourne under the Anadarko COC Plan are generally available to all WES employees, 100% of such amounts are included above because such amounts are not capped under the Services Agreement. |
199
CEO Pay Ratio
Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, require disclosure regarding the relationship of the annual compensation of our employees and the annual compensation of Mr. Michael P. Ure, our Chief Executive Officer (CEO). For the year ended December 31, 2019, our general partner did not directly employ any of the persons responsible for managing our business. Rather, until December 31, 2019, all of the employees, including executive officers, who managed our business were employed by Occidental (or, prior to the Occidental Merger, by Anadarko) and their respective subsidiaries other than us. As discussed in the Employees section in Business and Properties under Part I, Items 1 and 2 of this Form 10-K, as of December 31, 2019, we had 19 employees in the process of transferring to WES employment, which was effective as of January 12, 2020, and seconded employees deemed jointly employed by Occidental and our general partner. Nonetheless, in an effort to comply with this requirement, the pay ratio provided below has been calculated as the total 2019 annual compensation for Mr. Ure, divided by the total annual compensation of the median employee providing services to us pursuant to (i) the Services and Secondment Agreement and (ii) the omnibus agreement, in each case on an unallocated (100%) basis. For 2019, the ratio resulting from this calculation was 9 to 1.
Director Compensation
Officers or employees of Occidental who also serve as directors of our general partner do not receive additional compensation for their service as a director of our general partner. Non-employee directors of our general partner receive compensation for their board service and for attending Board and committee meetings pursuant to a director compensation plan approved by the Board of Directors. There were no changes to the director compensation plan during 2019, except that the value of the annual equity grant was increased from $100,000 to $125,000. Compensation for independent directors consists of the following:
• | an annual retainer of $110,000 for each non-employee Board member; |
• | an annual retainer of $2,000 for each member of the Audit Committee, or $17,000 for the Audit Committee chair; |
• | an annual retainer of $2,000 for each member of the Special Committee, or $17,000 for the Special Committee chair; |
• | a fee of $2,000 for each Board and committee meeting attended to the extent a non-employee Board member attends in excess of 10 total Board and committee meetings in one calendar year; and |
• | annual grants of phantom units with a value of approximately $125,000 on the date of grant, all of which vest 100% on the first anniversary of the date of grant (with vesting to be accelerated upon a change of control of our general partner or Occidental). |
In addition, each non-employee director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of the Board of Directors or committees and for costs associated with participation in continuing director education programs. Each director is fully indemnified by us, pursuant to individual indemnification agreements and our partnership agreement, for actions associated with being a director to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law.
The following table sets forth information concerning total director compensation earned during 2019 by each non-employee director:
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | Stock Awards (1) | Option Awards | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | All Other Compensation | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas R. Hix | $ | 121,681 | $ | 125,010 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 246,691 | ||||||||||||
Craig W. Stewart | 112,333 | 125,010 | — | — | — | 237,343 | ||||||||||||||||||
David J. Tudor | 146,518 | 125,010 | — | — | — | 271,528 | ||||||||||||||||||
Steven D. Arnold | 112,333 | 125,010 | — | — | — | 237,343 | ||||||||||||||||||
James R. Crane | 112,333 | 125,010 | — | — | — | 237,343 | ||||||||||||||||||
Milton Carroll | 79,989 | 125,010 | — | — | — | 204,999 |
(1) | The amounts included in the Stock Awards column represent the grant date fair value of non-option awards made to directors in 2019, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See the table below for phantom units awarded to each non-employee director during 2019. |
200
The following table contains the grant date fair value of phantom unit awards made to each non-employee director during 2019:
Name | Grant Date | Phantom Units (#) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (1) | |||||
Thomas R. Hix | May 8 | 4,202 | 125,010 | |||||
Craig W. Stewart | May 8 | 4,202 | 125,010 | |||||
David J. Tudor | May 8 | 4,202 | 125,010 | |||||
Steven D. Arnold | May 8 | 4,202 | 125,010 | |||||
James R. Crane | May 8 | 4,202 | 125,010 | |||||
Milton Carroll | May 8 | 4,202 | 125,010 |
(1) | The amounts included in the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards column represent the grant date fair value of the awards made to non-employee directors in 2019 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These awards vested on August 8, 2019, as a result of Anadarko being acquired by Occidental pursuant to the Occidental Merger. The value ultimately realized by a director upon the actual vesting of the award(s) may or may not have been equal to the value included above. |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
As previously discussed, our general partner’s Board of Directors is not required to maintain, and does not maintain, a compensation committee. Messrs. Vangolen, Bennett, and Brown and Mses. Backus and Kirk, who are directors of our general partner, are also executive or corporate officers of Occidental. However, all compensation decisions with respect to each of these persons are made by Occidental and none of these individuals receive any compensation directly from us or our general partner for their service as directors. Read Part III, Item 13 below in this Form 10-K for information about relationships among us, our general partner, and Occidental.
Compensation Committee Report
Neither we nor our general partner has a compensation committee. The Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above and based on this review and discussion has approved it for inclusion in this Form 10-K.
The Board of Directors of Western Midstream Holdings, LLC:
Glenn Vangolen
Michael P. Ure
Marcia E. Backus
Peter J. Bennett
Oscar K. Brown
Jennifer M. Kirk
Steven D. Arnold
James R. Crane
Thomas R. Hix
Craig W. Stewart
David J. Tudor
201
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common units held by the following as of February 24, 2020:
• | each member of the Board of Directors; |
• | each named executive officer of our general partner; |
• | all directors and officers of our general partner as a group; and |
• | Occidental and its affiliates. |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1) | Common Units Beneficially Owned (3) | Percentage of Common Units Beneficially Owned | |||
Occidental Petroleum Corporation (2) | 242,136,976 | 54.5% | |||
Glenn Vangolen | — | * | |||
Michael P. Ure | — | * | |||
Michael C. Pearl | 1,250 | * | |||
Craig W. Collins | 1,132 | * | |||
Robert W. Bourne | — | * | |||
Charles G. Griffie | 706 | * | |||
Marcia E. Backus | — | * | |||
Peter J. Bennett | — | * | |||
Oscar K. Brown | 1,440 | * | |||
Jennifer M. Kirk | — | * | |||
Steven D. Arnold | 72,616 | * | |||
James R. Crane | 254,201 | * | |||
Thomas R. Hix | 18,530 | * | |||
Craig W. Stewart | 30,073 | * | |||
David J. Tudor | 31,241 | * | |||
Christopher B. Dial | — | * | |||
Catherine A. Green | 100 | * | |||
All directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons) | 411,289 | * |
* | Less than 1% |
(1) | The address for Occidental and its representatives on the Board of Directors of our general partner is 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 110, Houston, Texas 77046. The address for all other beneficial owners in this table is 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380. |
(2) | WGRI owns 161,319,520 common units, AMH owns 24,771,550 common units, WGRAH owns 38,139,260 common units, Kerr-McGee Worldwide Corporation owns 684,922 common units, and Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC owns 17,221,724 common units of WES. Occidental is the ultimate parent company of each of the foregoing entities and may, therefore, be deemed to beneficially own the units held by such entities. |
(3) | Does not include unvested WES phantom unit awards as follows: |
Name | Number of Units | |||||
Time-Based Awards | TUR Awards | ROA Awards | ||||
Michael P. Ure | 156,055 | 46,817 | 46,817 | |||
Michael C. Pearl | 65,544 | 20,288 | 20,288 | |||
Craig W. Collins | 65,544 | 20,288 | 20,288 | |||
Charles G. Griffie | 40,575 | 12,485 | 12,485 | |||
Robert W. Bourne | 37,454 | 10,924 | 10,924 | |||
Christopher B. Dial | 34,333 | 9,364 | 9,364 | |||
Catherine A. Green | 14,046 | 3,902 | 3,902 |
202
The following table sets forth owners of 5% or greater of our common units, other than Occidental and its affiliates, the holdings of which are listed in the first table of this Item 12.
Title of Class | Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class | |||
Common Units | ALPS Advisors, Inc. 1290 Broadway, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80203 | 24,153,629 (1) | 5.33% |
(1) | Based upon its Schedule 13G filed February 7, 2020, with the SEC with respect to Partnership securities held as of December 31, 2019, ALPS Advisors, Inc. (“ALPS”) has shared voting and dispositive power as to 24,153,629 common units and Alerian MLP ETF, a fund controlled by ALPS, also has shared voting and dispositive power as to 24,098,923 of the common units held by ALPS. |
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan
The following table sets forth information with respect to the securities that may be issued under the LTIPs as of December 31, 2019. For more information regarding the LTIPs, read Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Plan Category | (a) Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights | (b) Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights | (c) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column(a)) | ||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | — | — | 3,419,020 | ||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | 2,911,985 | ||||||
Total | — | — | 6,331,005 |
203
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
As of February 24, 2020, Occidental held (i) 242,136,976 of our common units, representing a 53.4% limited partner interest in us, (ii) through its ownership of the general partner, 9,060,641 general partner units, representing a 2.0% general partner interest in us, and (iii) a 2.0% limited partner interest in WES Operating through its ownership of WGRAH.
We control, manage, and operate WES Operating through our ownership of WES Operating GP. We, directly and indirectly through our ownership of WES Operating GP, owned a 98.0% limited partner interest and the entire non-economic general partner interest in WES Operating.
The officers of our general partner are also officers of WES Operating GP and our general partner’s officers operate WES Operating’s business. Six of our directors are currently or formerly affiliated with Occidental and our remaining directors are independent as defined by the NYSE.
Agreements with Occidental
We, WES Operating, and other parties have entered into various agreements with Occidental as discussed below. These agreements were not the result of arm’s-length negotiations and, as such, they or the related underlying transactions may not be based on terms as favorable as those that could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
Merger transactions. On February 28, 2019, WES, WES Operating, Anadarko, and certain of their affiliates completed the Merger. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
Shared services agreements. Prior to December 31, 2019, Occidental performed centralized corporate functions for us and WES Operating under the omnibus agreements discussed below. On December 31, 2019, the omnibus agreements were terminated and replaced by the Services Agreement discussed in more detail below.
WES omnibus agreement. Prior to December 31, 2019, we had an omnibus agreement with Occidental and the general partner (the “WES omnibus agreement”) that governed (i) our obligation to reimburse Occidental for expenses incurred or payments made on our behalf in connection with Occidental’s provision of general and administrative services provided to us, including certain public company expenses and general and administrative expenses; (ii) our obligation to pay Occidental, in quarterly installments, an administrative services fee of $250,000 per year, which was subject to an annual increase pursuant to the omnibus agreement; and (iii) our obligation to reimburse Occidental for all insurance coverage expenses it incurred or payments it made on our behalf. The WES omnibus agreement was terminated as part of the December 2019 Agreements (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K).
The following table summarizes the amounts we reimbursed to Occidental pursuant to the WES omnibus agreement, separate from, and in addition to, those reimbursed by WES Operating:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses | $ | 604 | $ | 269 | $ | 263 | ||||||
Public company expenses | 4,089 | 2,895 | 1,821 | |||||||||
Total reimbursement | $ | 4,693 | $ | 3,164 | $ | 2,084 |
204
WES Operating omnibus agreement. Prior to December 31, 2019, WES Operating had a separate omnibus agreement with Occidental and WES Operating GP (the “WES Operating omnibus agreement”) that governed (i) Occidental’s obligation to indemnify WES Operating for certain liabilities and WES Operating’s obligation to indemnify Occidental for certain liabilities; (ii) WES Operating’s obligation to reimburse Occidental for expenses incurred or payments made on its behalf in conjunction with Occidental’s provision of general and administrative services provided to WES Operating, including salary and benefits of Occidental personnel, public company expenses, general and administrative expenses, and salaries and benefits of WES Operating’s executive management who were employees of Occidental; and (iii) WES Operating’s obligation to reimburse Anadarko for all insurance coverage expenses it incurred or payments it made with respect to WES Operating’s assets. Occidental, in accordance with the partnership agreement and the WES Operating omnibus agreement, determined, in its reasonable discretion, amounts to be reimbursed by WES Operating in exchange for services provided under the WES Operating omnibus agreement. The WES Operating omnibus agreement was terminated as part of the December 2019 Agreements (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K).
The following table summarizes the amounts WES Operating reimbursed to Occidental pursuant to the WES Operating omnibus agreement:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses | $ | 84,039 | $ | 35,077 | $ | 31,733 | ||||||
Public company expenses | 4,065 | 15,409 | 9,379 | |||||||||
Total reimbursement | $ | 88,104 | $ | 50,486 | $ | 41,112 |
Services and secondment agreement. Pursuant to the services and secondment agreement, which was amended and restated on December 31, 2019, and is now referred to as the Services Agreement, specified employees of Occidental are seconded to WES Operating GP to provide, under the direction, supervision, and control of our general partner, operating, routine maintenance, and other services with respect to the assets we own and operate. Occidental is reimbursed for services provided by the seconded employees.
Pursuant to the Services Agreement, Occidental (i) seconds certain personnel employed by Occidental to WES Operating GP, in exchange for which WES Operating GP pays a monthly secondment and shared services fee to Occidental equivalent to the direct cost of the seconded employees and (ii) continues to provide certain administrative and operational services to us. The initial term of the Services Agreement is two years and will automatically extend for additional six-month periods unless either party provides a 30-day written notice of termination prior to the initial two-year or additional six-month period expires. However, the Services Agreement provides for the transfer of certain employees to us, which is anticipated to occur prior to the end of 2020. For additional information on the Services Agreement, see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Indemnification agreements with directors and officers. Our general partner entered into indemnification agreements with each of its officers and directors (each, an “Indemnitee”). The indemnification agreements provide that each Indemnitee will be indemnified and held harmless against all expense, liability, and loss (including attorney’s fees, judgments, fines or penalties, and amounts to be paid in settlement) actually and reasonably incurred or suffered by the Indemnitee in connection with serving in their capacity as officers and directors of our general partner (or of any subsidiary of our general partner) or in any capacity at the request of our general partner or its Board of Directors to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, including Section 18-108 of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act in effect on the date of the agreement or as such laws may be amended to provide more advantageous rights to the Indemnitee. The indemnification agreements also provide that advance payment of certain expenses must be made to the Indemnitee, including fees of counsel, in advance of final disposition of any proceeding subject to receipt of an undertaking from the Indemnitee to return such advance if it is ultimately determined that the Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification.
Through December 31, 2019, there have been no payments or claims to Occidental related to indemnifications and no payments or claims have been received from Occidental related to indemnifications.
205
Tax sharing agreements. We and WES Operating have tax sharing agreements with Occidental, pursuant to which Occidental is reimbursed for our and WES Operating’s estimated share of taxes from all forms of taxation, excluding taxes imposed by the United States. Taxes for which Occidental is reimbursed include state taxes attributable to our and WES Operating’s income that are directly borne by Occidental through its filing of a combined or consolidated tax return. Taxes related to assets previously acquired from Anadarko were reimbursed in periods beginning on and subsequent to the acquisition of such assets. Occidental may use its own tax attributes to reduce or eliminate the tax liability of its combined or consolidated group, which may include us and WES Operating as members. However, under this circumstance, we and WES Operating nevertheless are required to reimburse Occidental for the allocable share of taxes that would have been owed had the tax attributes not been available to Occidental.
Indemnification agreements. Prior to December 31, 2019, WES Operating GP was indemnified by wholly owned subsidiaries of Occidental against any claims made against WES Operating GP for WES Operating’s long-term debt and/or borrowings under the RCF and Term loan facility. These indemnification agreements were terminated as part of the December 2019 Agreements.
Chipeta LLC agreement. We are party to the Chipeta LLC agreement, together with a third-party member. Among other things, the Chipeta LLC agreement provides the following:
• | Chipeta’s members will be required from time to time to make capital contributions to Chipeta to the extent approved by the members in connection with Chipeta’s annual budget; |
• | Chipeta will distribute available cash, as defined in the Chipeta LLC agreement, if any, to its members quarterly in accordance with those members’ membership interests; and |
• | Chipeta’s membership interests are subject to significant restrictions on transfer. |
We are the managing member of Chipeta. As managing member, we manage the day-to-day operations of Chipeta and receive a management fee from the other member, which is intended to compensate the managing member for the performance of its duties. We may be removed as the managing member only if we are grossly negligent or fraudulent, breach our primary duties, or fail to respond in a commercially reasonable manner to written business proposals from the other members, and such behavior, breach, or failure has a material adverse effect to Chipeta.
Commodity-price swap agreements. Prior to their expiration on December 31, 2018, we had commodity-price swap agreements with Anadarko to mitigate exposure to commodity-price risk inherent in our percent-of-proceeds, percent-of-product, and keep-whole gas-processing contracts. See Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
206
Gathering and processing agreements. We have significant gathering and processing arrangements with affiliates of Occidental on most of our systems. For the year ended December 31, 2019, production owned or controlled by Occidental represented 38% of our throughput for natural-gas assets (excluding equity-investment throughput) and 83% of our throughput for crude-oil, NGLs, and produced-water assets (excluding equity-investment throughput).
Effective December 31, 2019, Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore, LP, a subsidiary of Occidental, and Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC (“KMGG”), a subsidiary of WES Operating, entered into an amendment to the DJ gas-gathering agreement to provide for the extension of gathering services by KMGG to gas produced by a subsidiary of Occidental in Weld County, Colorado, in the DJ Basin for a primary term ending August 2029.
Commodity purchase and sale agreements. We sell a significant amount of our natural gas and NGLs to AESC, Occidental’s marketing affiliate that acts as our agent for third-party sales. In addition, we purchase natural gas from AESC pursuant to purchase agreements.
Marketing Transition Services Agreement. Effective December 31, 2019, certain subsidiaries of Anadarko entered into a transition services agreement (the “Marketing Transition Services Agreement”) to provide certain marketing-related services to certain of our subsidiaries through December 31, 2020, subject to our subsidiaries’ option to extend such services for an additional six-month period.
Exchange Agreement. On December 31, 2019, WGRI, the general partner, and WES entered into the Exchange Agreement, pursuant to which WES canceled the non-economic general partner interest in WES and simultaneously issued a 2.0% general partner interest to the general partner in exchange for which WGRI transferred 9,060,641 WES common units to WES, which immediately canceled such units on receipt.
Affiliate asset contributions. The following table summarizes affiliate contributions of other assets to us:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Cash consideration paid | $ | (425 | ) | $ | (254 | ) | $ | (3,910 | ) | |||
Net carrying value | 335 | 59,089 | 5,283 | |||||||||
Partners’ capital adjustment | $ | (90 | ) | $ | 58,835 | $ | 1,373 |
Summary of affiliate transactions. Affiliate revenues include (i) income from our investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting and (ii) amounts earned from services provided to Occidental and from the sale of natural gas, condensate, and NGLs to Occidental. In addition, we purchase natural gas from an affiliate of Occidental pursuant to gas purchase agreements. Operation and maintenance expense includes amounts accrued for or paid to affiliates for the operation of our assets and for services provided to affiliates, including field labor, measurement and analysis, and other disbursements. A portion of general and administrative expense is paid by Occidental, which results in affiliate transactions pursuant to the reimbursement provisions of the WES and WES Operating agreements with Occidental. Affiliate expenses do not bear a direct relationship to affiliate revenues, and third-party expenses do not bear a direct relationship to third-party revenues.
207
The following table summarizes material affiliate transactions included in our consolidated financial statements (see Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K):
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Revenues and other (1) | $ | 1,607,396 | $ | 1,353,711 | $ | 1,539,105 | ||||||
Equity income, net – affiliates (1) | 237,518 | 195,469 | 115,141 | |||||||||
Operating expenses | ||||||||||||
Cost of product (1) | 254,771 | 168,535 | 74,560 | |||||||||
Operation and maintenance (1) | 146,990 | 115,948 | 82,249 | |||||||||
General and administrative (2) | 101,485 | 49,672 | 43,221 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 503,246 | 334,155 | 200,030 | |||||||||
Interest income (3) | 16,900 | 16,900 | 16,900 | |||||||||
Interest expense (4) | 1,970 | 6,746 | 224 | |||||||||
APCWH Note Payable borrowings | 11,000 | 321,780 | 98,813 | |||||||||
Repayment of APCWH Note Payable | 439,595 | — | — | |||||||||
Settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (5) | — | — | (37,346 | ) | ||||||||
Distributions to WES unitholders (6) | 566,868 | 400,194 | 360,523 | |||||||||
Distributions to WES Operating unitholders (7) | 19,768 | 7,583 | 7,100 | |||||||||
Above-market component of swap agreements with Anadarko | 7,407 | 51,618 | 58,551 |
(1) | Represents amounts earned or incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, and amounts earned or incurred by Anadarko on a historical basis for periods prior to the acquisition of such assets. |
(2) | Represents general and administrative expense incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, and a management services fee for expenses incurred by Anadarko for periods prior to the acquisition of such assets. These amounts include equity-based compensation expense allocated to us by Occidental (see LTIPs and Incentive Plans in Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K) and amounts charged by Occidental under the WES and WES Operating omnibus agreements. |
(3) | Represents interest income recognized on the Anadarko note receivable. |
(4) | Includes amounts related to finance leases and the APCWH Note Payable (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). |
(5) | Represents the cash payment to Anadarko for the settlement of the Deferred purchase price obligation – Anadarko (see Note 3—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). |
(6) | Represents distributions paid to Occidental pursuant to our partnership agreement (see Note 4—Partnership Distributions and Note 5—Equity and Partners’ Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). |
(7) | Represents distributions paid to certain subsidiaries of Occidental pursuant to WES Operating’s partnership agreement (see Note 4—Partnership Distributions and Note 5—Equity and Partners’ Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). |
208
The following table summarizes material affiliate transactions for WES Operating (which are included in our consolidated financial statements) to the extent the amounts differ from our consolidated financial statements:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
General and administrative (1) | $ | 99,613 | $ | 48,819 | $ | 42,411 | ||||||
Distributions to WES Operating unitholders (2) | 1,025,931 | 514,906 | 452,777 |
(1) | Represents general and administrative expense incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of assets from Anadarko, and a management services fee for expenses incurred by Anadarko for periods prior to the acquisition of such assets. These amounts include equity-based compensation expense allocated to WES Operating by Occidental (see LTIPs and Incentive Plans in Note 6—Transactions with Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K) and amounts charged by Occidental pursuant to the WES Operating omnibus agreement. |
(2) | Represents distributions paid to us and certain subsidiaries of Occidental pursuant to WES Operating’s partnership agreement (see Note 4—Partnership Distributions and Note 5—Equity and Partners’ Capital in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). For the year ended December 31, 2019, includes distributions to us and a subsidiary of Occidental related to the repayment of the WGP RCF (see Note 13—Debt and Interest Expense in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). |
Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of interest exist and may arise in the future as a result of the relationships between our general partner and its affiliates, including Occidental, on the one hand, and our partnership and our limited partners, on the other hand. The directors and officers of our general partner have fiduciary duties to manage our general partner in a manner beneficial to its owner (Occidental). At the same time, our general partner also has duties to manage our partnership in a manner beneficial to us and our unitholders.
Whenever a conflict arises between our general partner or its affiliates, on the one hand, and us and our limited partners, on the other hand, our general partner will resolve the conflict. Our partnership agreement contains provisions that modify and limit our general partner’s default state law fiduciary duties to our unitholders. Our partnership agreement also restricts the remedies available to our unitholders for actions taken by our general partner that, without those limitations, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duties otherwise applicable under state law. See Special Committee under Part III, Item 10 of this Form 10-K.
Our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations under the partnership agreement or its duties to us or our unitholders if the resolution of the conflict is any of the following:
• | approved by the Special Committee of our general partner, although our general partner is not obligated to seek such approval; |
• | approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding any common units owned by our general partner or any of its affiliates; |
• | on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or |
• | fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the totality of the relationships among the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to us. |
209
Our general partner may, but in most circumstances is not required to, seek the approval of such resolution from the Special Committee of its Board of Directors. In connection with a situation involving a conflict of interest, any determination by our general partner involving the resolution of the conflict of interest must be made in good faith, provided that, if our general partner does not seek approval from the Special Committee and its Board of Directors determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in the third and fourth bullet points above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the Board of Directors acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or the Partnership, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption. Unless the resolution of a conflict is specifically provided for in the partnership agreement, our general partner or the Special Committee may consider any factors that it determines in good faith to be appropriate when resolving a conflict. Our partnership agreement provides that for someone to act in good faith, that person must reasonably believe he is acting in the best interests of the Partnership.
Additionally, the Board of Directors has adopted a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”), under which all directors and officers of the general partner, and employees working on our behalf, are expected to avoid conflicts or the appearance of conflicts in relation to their duties and responsibilities to us, and report any violation of the Code by any person. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, any waivers of the Code for any officer or director may only be made by the Board of Directors or by a committee of the Board of Directors composed of independent directors.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
We have engaged KPMG LLP as our and WES Operating’s independent registered public accounting firm. The following table presents fees for the audit of the annual consolidated financial statements for the last two fiscal years and for other services provided by KPMG LLP:
WES | WES Operating | |||||||||||||||
thousands | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Audit fees | $ | 325 | $ | 235 | $ | 1,862 | $ | 1,860 | ||||||||
Audit-related fees | 25 | — | 375 | 210 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 350 | $ | 235 | $ | 2,237 | $ | 2,070 |
Audit fees are primarily for the audit of our and WES Operating’s consolidated financial statements, including the audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, consents, comfort letters, other audits, and the reviews of financial statements included in the Forms 10-Q. Audit-related fees are primarily for certain financial accounting consultations.
Audit Committee Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
The Audit Committee of our general partner has adopted a Pre-Approval Policy with respect to services that may be performed by KPMG LLP. This policy lists specific audit-related services and any other services that KPMG LLP is authorized to perform and sets out specific dollar limits for each specific service, which may not be exceeded without additional Audit Committee authorization. The Audit Committee receives quarterly reports on the status of expenditures pursuant to that Pre-Approval Policy. The Audit Committee reviews the policy at least annually in order to approve services and limits for the current year. Any service that is not clearly enumerated in the policy must receive specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee or by its Chairman, to whom such authority has been conditionally delegated, prior to engagement. During 2019, no fees for services outside the scope of audit, review, or attestation that exceed the waiver provisions of 17 CFR 210.2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) were approved by the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee has approved the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm to conduct the audit of our and WES Operating’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.
210
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) Financial Statements
Our consolidated financial statements are included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. For a listing of these statements and accompanying footnotes, see the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not required, not applicable, or the information is included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
(a)(3) Exhibits
Exhibit Index
Exhibit Number | Description | |||
# | 2. | 1 | ||
3. | 1 | |||
3. | 2 | |||
3. | 3 | |||
3. | 4 | |||
3. | 5 | |||
3. | 6 | |||
3. | 7 | |||
3. | 8 | |||
3. | 9 |
211
Exhibit Number | Description | |||
3. | 10 | |||
3. | 11 | |||
3. | 12 | |||
3. | 13 | |||
3. | 14 | |||
3. | 15 | |||
3. | 16 | |||
* | 4. | 1 | ||
4. | 2 | |||
4. | 3 | |||
4. | 4 | |||
4. | 5 | |||
4. | 6 | |||
4. | 7 | |||
4. | 8 | |||
4. | 9 | |||
4. | 10 | |||
4. | 11 |
212
Exhibit Number | Description | |||
4. | 12 | |||
4. | 13 | |||
4. | 14 | |||
4. | 15 | |||
4. | 16 | |||
4. | 17 | |||
4. | 18 | |||
4. | 19 | |||
4. | 20 | |||
4. | 21 | |||
4. | 22 | |||
4. | 23 | |||
4. | 24 | |||
10. | 1 | |||
10. | 2 | |||
10. | 3 |
213
Exhibit Number | Description | |||
10. | 4 | |||
10. | 5 | |||
10. | 6 | |||
10. | 7 | |||
10. | 8 | |||
10. | 9 | |||
10. | 10 | |||
‡ | 10. | 11 | ||
‡ | 10. | 12 | ||
10. | 13 | |||
10. | 14 | |||
10. | 15 | |||
‡ | 10. | 16 | ||
‡ | 10. | 17 | ||
‡ | 10. | 18 | ||
‡ | 10. | 19 | ||
‡ | 10. | 20 | ||
‡ | 10. | 21 |
214
Exhibit Number | Description | |||
‡ | 10. | 22 | ||
‡ | 10. | 23 | ||
‡ | 10. | 24 | ||
† | 10. | 25 | ||
10. | 26 | |||
10. | 27 | |||
10. | 28 | |||
10. | 29 | |||
10. | 30 | |||
10. | 31 | |||
10. | 32 | |||
10. | 33 | |||
10. | 34 | |||
10. | 35 | |||
10. | 36 | |||
10. | 37 |
215
Exhibit Number | Description | |||
† | 10. | 38 | ||
† | 10. | 39 | ||
† | 10. | 40 | ||
† | 10. | 41 | ||
* † | 10. | 42 | ||
† | 10. | 43 | ||
10. | 44 | |||
10. | 45 | |||
* | 21. | 1 | ||
* | 23. | 1 | ||
* | 23. | 2 | ||
* | 31. | 1 | ||
* | 31. | 2 | ||
* | 31. | 3 | ||
* | 31. | 4 | ||
** | 32. | 1 | ||
** | 32. | 2 | ||
* | 101. | INS | XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document) | |
* | 101. | SCH | Inline XBRL Schema Document | |
* | 101. | CAL | Inline XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document | |
* | 101. | DEF | Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document | |
* | 101. | LAB | Inline XBRL Label Linkbase Document | |
* | 101. | PRE | Inline XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document | |
* | 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) |
216
* | Filed herewith |
** | Furnished herewith |
# | Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
† | Portions of this exhibit have been omitted as confidential pursuant to Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K or a request for confidential treatment. |
‡ | Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed pursuant to Item 15. |
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
Not applicable.
217
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP | |
February 27, 2020 | |
/s/ Michael C. Pearl | |
Michael C. Pearl Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Western Midstream Holdings, LLC (as general partner of Western Midstream Partners, LP) | |
WESTERN MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LP | |
February 27, 2020 | |
/s/ Michael C. Pearl | |
Michael C. Pearl Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Western Midstream Operating GP, LLC (as general partner of Western Midstream Operating, LP) |
Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Michael P. Ure and Michael C. Pearl, and each of them, either one of whom may act without joinder of the other, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all, exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each, and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, or the substitute or substitutes of any or all of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
218
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 27, 2020.
Signature | Title (Position with Western Midstream Holdings, LLC) |
/s/ Glenn Vangolen | Chairman |
Glenn Vangolen | |
/s/ Michael P. Ure | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Michael P. Ure | (Principal Executive Officer) |
/s/ Michael C. Pearl | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Michael C. Pearl | (Principal Financial Officer) |
/s/ Catherine A. Green | Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
Catherine A. Green | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
/s/ Marcia E. Backus | Director |
Marcia E. Backus | |
/s/ Peter J. Bennett | Director |
Peter J. Bennett | |
/s/ Oscar K. Brown | Director |
Oscar K. Brown | |
/s/ Jennifer M. Kirk | Director |
Jennifer M. Kirk | |
/s/ Steven D. Arnold | Director |
Steven D. Arnold | |
/s/ James R. Crane | Director |
James R. Crane | |
/s/ Thomas R. Hix | Director |
Thomas R. Hix | |
/s/ Craig W. Stewart | Director |
Craig W. Stewart | |
/s/ David J. Tudor | Director |
David J. Tudor |
219