Western New England Bancorp, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the
transition period from _____ to _____.
Commission
file number 001-16767
Westfield
Financial, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts
|
73-1627673
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification
No.)
|
141
Elm Street, Westfield, Massachusetts 01086
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(Zip
Code)
(413)
568-1911
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes o No
o.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No
x
At May 3,
2010 the registrant had 29,580,912 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value,
issued and outstanding.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
||||
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||||
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements of Westfield Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
2
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets (Unaudited) – March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009
|
2
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Income (Unaudited) – Three Months Ended
|
||||
March
31, 2010 and 2009
|
3
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and
Comprehensive
|
||||
Income
(Unaudited) – Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
4
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) – Three Months Ended
|
||||
March
31, 2010 and 2009
|
5
|
|||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
6
|
|||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
|
|||
Results
of Operations
|
22
|
|||
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
31
|
||
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
32
|
||
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
33
|
||
Item 1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
33
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
33
|
||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
33
|
||
Item
4.
|
Removed
and Reserved
|
33
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
33
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
33
|
||
Signatures
|
34
|
|||
Exhibits
|
35
|
FORWARD
– LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
contains “forward-looking statements.” These forward-looking
statements are made in good faith pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words
“may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,”
“expect,” “intend,” “plan” and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may be
subject to significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors,
including, but not limited to, changes in the real estate market or local
economy, changes in interest rates, changes in laws and regulations to which we
are subject, and competition in our primary market area.
Although
we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements
are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from the results discussed
in these forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
date hereof. Westfield Financial undertakes no obligation to
republish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated
events.
1
PART
I
ITEM
1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WESTFIELD
FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS - UNAUDITED
(Dollars
in thousands)
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$ | 8,738 | $ | 12,204 | ||||
Federal
funds sold
|
1,016 | 2 | ||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits and other short-term investments
|
6,723 | 16,513 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
16,477 | 28,719 | ||||||
SECURITIES:
|
||||||||
Available
for sale - at fair value
|
19,699 | 19,316 | ||||||
Held
to maturity - at amortized cost (fair value of $69,550 at March 31, 2010,
and $72,364 at December 31, 2009)
|
66,470 | 69,244 | ||||||
MORTGAGE-BACKED
SECURITIES:
|
||||||||
Available
for sale - at fair value
|
340,977 | 299,805 | ||||||
Held
to maturity - at amortized cost (fair value $222,844 at March 31, 2010,
and $231,255 at December 31, 2009)
|
217,387 | 225,767 | ||||||
FEDERAL
HOME LOAN BANK OF BOSTON AND OTHER RESTRICTED STOCK - AT
COST
|
10,339 | 10,339 | ||||||
LOANS
- Net of allowance for loan losses of $7,551 at March 31, 2010,and $7,645
at December 31, 2009
|
459,884 | 469,149 | ||||||
PREMISES
AND EQUIPMENT, Net
|
12,002 | 12,202 | ||||||
ACCRUED
INTEREST RECEIVABLE
|
5,286 | 5,198 | ||||||
BANK-OWNED
LIFE INSURANCE
|
38,238 | 37,880 | ||||||
DEFERRED
TAX ASSET, Net
|
7,211 | 6,995 | ||||||
OTHER
REAL ESTATE OWNED
|
977 | 1,662 | ||||||
OTHER
ASSETS
|
4,810 | 5,134 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 1,199,757 | $ | 1,191,410 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
DEPOSITS:
|
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
|
$ | 82,816 | $ | 80,110 | ||||
Interest-bearing
|
578,502 | 567,865 | ||||||
Total
deposits
|
661,318 | 647,975 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS
|
74,749 | 74,499 | ||||||
LONG-TERM
DEBT
|
209,876 | 213,845 | ||||||
OTHER
LIABILITIES
|
8,204 | 7,792 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
954,147 | 944,111 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock – $0.01 par value 5,000,000 shares authorized. None
outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock - $0.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized, 29,581,712 shares
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010; 29,818,526 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
296 | 298 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
191,905 | 193,609 | ||||||
Unearned
compensation – ESOP
|
(10,149 | ) | (10,299 | ) | ||||
Unearned
compensation - Equity Incentive Plan
|
(2,959 | ) | (3,248 | ) | ||||
Retained
earnings
|
69,197 | 69,253 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(2,680 | ) | (2,314 | ) | ||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
245,610 | 247,299 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$ | 1,199,757 | $ | 1,191,410 |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
WESTFIELD
FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME - UNAUDITED
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
Three
Months
Ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
INTEREST
AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
|
||||||||
Debt
securities, taxable
|
$ | 5,361 | $ | 6,214 | ||||
Residential
and commercial real estate loans
|
4,476 | 4,619 | ||||||
Commercial
and industrial loans
|
1,635 | 1,768 | ||||||
Debt
securities, tax-exempt
|
371 | 367 | ||||||
Consumer
loans
|
56 | 71 | ||||||
Equity
securities
|
55 | 59 | ||||||
Federal
funds sold, interest-bearing deposits and other short-term
investments
|
1 | 4 | ||||||
Total
interest and dividend income
|
11,955 | 13,102 | ||||||
INTEREST
EXPENSE:
|
||||||||
Deposits
|
2,615 | 3,275 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
1,586 | 1,711 | ||||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
63 | 98 | ||||||
Total
interest expense
|
4,264 | 5,084 | ||||||
Net
interest and dividend income
|
7,691 | 8,018 | ||||||
PROVISION
FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
500 | 1,150 | ||||||
Net
interest and dividend income after provision for loan
losses
|
7,191 | 6,868 | ||||||
NONINTEREST
INCOME (LOSS):
|
||||||||
Total
other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities
|
(1,071 | ) | - | |||||
Portion
of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in
accumulated
other
comprehensive loss
|
971 | - | ||||||
Net
other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in
income
|
(100 | ) | - | |||||
Service
charges and fees
|
492 | 709 | ||||||
Income
from bank-owned life insurance
|
358 | 351 | ||||||
Gain
on sales of securities, net
|
186 | 87 | ||||||
Loss
on disposal of premises and equipment, net
|
- | (8 | ) | |||||
Gain
on sale of other real estate owned
|
7 | - | ||||||
Total
noninterest income
|
943 | 1,139 | ||||||
NONINTEREST
EXPENSE:
|
||||||||
Salaries
and employees benefits
|
3,800 | 4,107 | ||||||
Occupancy
|
660 | 649 | ||||||
Computer
operations
|
485 | 437 | ||||||
Professional
fees
|
423 | 401 | ||||||
OREO
expense
|
243 | - | ||||||
FDIC
insurance assessment
|
163 | 157 | ||||||
Other
|
604 | 657 | ||||||
Total
noninterest expense
|
6,378 | 6,408 | ||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
1,756 | 1,599 | ||||||
INCOME
TAXES
|
402 | 394 | ||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$ | 1,354 | $ | 1,205 | ||||
EARNINGS
PER COMMON SHARE:
|
||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.04 | ||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
28,186,887 | 29,685,701 | ||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.04 | ||||
Weighted
average diluted shares outstanding
|
28,439,241 | 29,970,633 | ||||||
See
accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
|
3
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME-
UNAUDITED
THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
(Dollars
in thousands, except share data)
Unearned
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Additional
|
Unearned
|
Compensation
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Par
|
Paid-in
|
Compensation
|
-
Equity
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Value
|
Capital
|
-
ESOP
|
Incentive
Plan
|
Earnings
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT DECEMBER 31, 2008
|
31,307,881 | $ | 313 | $ | 204,866 | $ | (10,913 | ) | $ | (4,337 | ) | $ | 78,898 | $ | (8,908 | ) | $ | 259,919 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | - | - | 1,205 | - | 1,205 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized gains on securities available for sale arising during the
period, net of reclassification adjustment and tax effects
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 3,276 | 3,276 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
4,481 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock held by ESOP committed to be released (91,493
shares)
|
- | - | 70 | 154 | - | - | - | 224 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation - stock options
|
- | - | 273 | - | - | - | - | 273 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation - equity incentive plan
|
- | - | - | - | 383 | - | - | 383 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess
tax benefits from equity incentive plan
|
- | - | 8 | - | - | - | - | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
(172,397 | ) | (2 | ) | (1,621 | ) | - | - | - | - | (1,623 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in connection with stock option exercises
|
59,721 | 1 | 574 | - | - | (313 | ) | - | 262 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in connection with equity incentive plan
|
- | - | 138 | - | (138 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess
tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises
|
- | - | 103 | - | - | - | - | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared ($0.05 per share)
|
- | - | - | - | - | (1,491 | ) | - | (1,491 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT MARCH 31, 2009
|
31,195,205 | $ | 312 | $ | 204,411 | $ | (10,759 | ) | $ | (4,092 | ) | $ | 78,299 | $ | (5,632 | ) | $ | 262,539 | ||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
29,818,526 | $ | 298 | $ | 193,609 | $ | (10,299 | ) | $ | (3,248 | ) | $ | 69,253 | $ | (2,314 | ) | $ | 247,299 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | - | - | 1,354 | - | 1,354 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized losses on securities available for sale arising during the
period, net of reclassification adjustment and tax effects
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (384 | ) | (384 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in pension gains or losses and transition assets, net of
tax
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
988 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock held by ESOP committed to be released (89,040
shares)
|
- | - | 35 | 150 | - | - | - | 185 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation - stock options
|
- | - | 199 | - | - | - | - | 199 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation - equity incentive plan
|
- | - | - | - | 289 | - | - | 289 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
(236,814 | ) | (2 | ) | (1,944 | ) | - | - | - | - | (1,946 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Excess
tax benefits from equity incentive plan
|
- | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared ($0.05 per share)
|
- | - | - | - | - | (1,410 | ) | - | (1,410 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT MARCH 31, 2010
|
29,581,712 | $ | 296 | $ | 191,905 | $ | (10,149 | ) | $ | (2,959 | ) | $ | 69,197 | $ | (2,680 | ) | $ | 245,610 | ||||||||||||||
See
the accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
|
4
WESTFIELD
FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – UNAUDITED
(Dollars
in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 1,354 | $ | 1,205 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
500 | 1,150 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization of premises and equipment
|
318 | 298 | ||||||
Net
amortization of premiums and discounts on securities,
mortgage-backed
|
||||||||
securities
and mortgage loans
|
1,409 | 118 | ||||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
488 | 656 | ||||||
Amortization
of ESOP expense
|
185 | 224 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits from equity incentive plan
|
(6 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Excess
tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises
|
- | (103 | ) | |||||
Net
gains on sales of securities
|
(186 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||
Other-than-temporary
impairment losses of securities
|
100 | - | ||||||
Write-downs
of other real estate owned
|
227 | - | ||||||
Gain
on sale of other real estate owned
|
(7 | ) | - | |||||
Loss
on disposal of premises and equipment, net
|
- | 8 | ||||||
Deferred
income tax benefit
|
(53 | ) | (69 | ) | ||||
Income
from bank-owned life insurance
|
(358 | ) | (351 | ) | ||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
(88 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||
Other
assets
|
324 | 283 | ||||||
Other
liabilities
|
445 | 843 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
4,652 | 4,144 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Securities,
held to maturity:
|
||||||||
Purchases
|
(2,253 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds
from calls, maturities, and principal collections
|
5,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Securities,
available for sale:
|
||||||||
Purchases
|
(50 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sales
|
- | 5,107 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities, held to maturity:
|
||||||||
Purchases
|
(10,929 | ) | (45,748 | ) | ||||
Principal
collections
|
18,949 | 9,164 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities, available for sale:
|
||||||||
Purchases
|
(116,670 | ) | (51,173 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sales
|
48,168 | - | ||||||
Principal
collections
|
25,509 | 10,341 | ||||||
Purchase
of residential mortgages
|
(2,901 | ) | (8,936 | ) | ||||
Net
loan principal payments, net of originations
|
11,124 | 14,274 | ||||||
Purchase
of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock
|
- | (637 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from sale of other real estate owned
|
1,003 | - | ||||||
Purchases
of premises and equipment
|
(118 | ) | (462 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(23,168 | ) | (58,123 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
increase in deposits
|
13,343 | 12,778 | ||||||
Net
change in short-term borrowings
|
250 | 2,650 | ||||||
Repayment
of long-term debt
|
(4,000 | ) | (15,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from long-term debt
|
31 | 35,500 | ||||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
(1,410 | ) | (1,491 | ) | ||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
(1,946 | ) | (1,623 | ) | ||||
Issuance
of common stock in connection with stock option exercises
|
- | 262 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits in connection with equity incentive plan
|
6 | 8 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises
|
- | 103 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
6,274 | 33,187 | ||||||
NET
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
(12,242 | ) | (20,792 | ) | ||||
Beginning
of period
|
28,719 | 56,533 | ||||||
End
of period
|
$ | 16,477 | $ | 35,741 | ||||
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Transfer
of loans to other real estate owned
|
$ | 538 | $ | - | ||||
Net
cash due to broker for purchase of securities, held to
maturity
|
- | (5,000 | ) | |||||
Interest
paid
|
4,269 | 5,017 | ||||||
Taxes
paid
|
70 | 71 | ||||||
See
the accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
|
5
WESTFIELD
FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations –
Westfield Financial, Inc. (“we”, “us”) is the bank holding company for
Westfield Bank, a federally-chartered stock savings bank.
Westfield
Bank’s deposits are insured to the limits specified by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Westfield Bank operates eleven
branches in Western Massachusetts. Westfield Bank’s primary sources
of revenue are income from investment securities and earnings on loans to small
and middle-market businesses and to residential property
homeowners.
Elm
Street Securities Corporation and WFD Securities Corporation,
Massachusetts-chartered security corporations, were formed by Westfield
Financial for the primary purpose of holding qualified investment
securities. In October 2009, WB Real Estate Holdings, LLC, a
Massachusetts-chartered limited liability company was formed for the primary
purpose of holding real property acquired as security for debts previously
contracted by the bank.
Principles of
Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Westfield Financial, Westfield Bank, Elm Street Securities
Corporation, WB Real Estate Holdings and WFD Securities
Corporation. All material intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
Estimates
– The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.
GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of income and expenses for each. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination
of the allowance for loan losses, other-than-temporary impairment of securities,
and the valuation of deferred tax assets.
Basis of
Presentation – In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of our financial
condition as of March 31, 2010, and the results of operations, changes in
shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the interim periods
presented. The results of operations for the three months ended March
31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the
year ending December 31, 2010. Certain information and disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP
have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
These
unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Reclassifications
- Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
6
2. EARNINGS
PER SHARE
Basic
earnings per share represent income available to shareholders’ divided by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares
that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential shares had been issued,
as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed
issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by us relate
solely to outstanding stock options and are determined using the treasury stock
method.
Earnings
per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 have been
computed based on the following:
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||
Net
income applicable to common stock
|
$ | 1,354 | $ | 1,205 | ||||
Average
number of common shares issued
|
29,691 | 31,292 | ||||||
Less:
Average unallocated ESOP Shares
|
(1,460 | ) | (1,551 | ) | ||||
Less:
Average ungranted equity incentive plan shares
|
(44 | ) | (55 | ) | ||||
Average
number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic earnings per
common share
|
28,187 | 29,686 | ||||||
Effect
of dilutive stock options
|
252 | 285 | ||||||
Average
number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per
common share
|
28,439 | 29,971 | ||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.04 | ||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.04 |
Stock
options that would have an antidilutive effect on diluted earnings per share are
excluded from the calculation. At March 31, 2010 and 2009, 1,551,024
and 1,540,857 shares were antidilutive, respectively.
7
3. COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME/LOSS
Accounting
principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses
be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and
liabilities are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the
balance sheet, such items, along with net income are components of comprehensive
income.
The
components of other comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects are as
follows:
Three Months Ended March 31
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||
Unrealized
holding (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities
|
$ | (470 | ) | $ | 5,166 | |||
Other-than-temporary
impairment losses on available-for-sale
|
||||||||
securities
charged to earnings
|
100 | - | ||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for gains realized in income
|
(186 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||
Net
unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities
|
(556 | ) | 5,079 | |||||
Tax
effect
|
172 | (1,803 | ) | |||||
Net
of tax amount
|
(384 | ) | 3,276 | |||||
Losses
arising during the period pertaining to defined benefit
plans
|
7 | - | ||||||
Reclassification
adjustments for items reflected in earnings:
|
||||||||
Actuarial
loss
|
23 | - | ||||||
Transition
asset
|
(3 | ) | - | |||||
Net
adjustments pertaining to defined benefit plan
|
27 | - | ||||||
Tax
effect
|
(9 | ) | - | |||||
Net-of-tax
amount
|
18 | - | ||||||
Net
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
$ | (366 | ) | $ | 3,276 |
The
components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in shareholders’
equity are as follows:
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||
Net
unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale
|
$ | (1,291 | ) | $ | (228 | ) | ||
Tax
effect
|
519 | 138 | ||||||
Net-of-tax
amount
|
(772 | ) | (90 | ) | ||||
Noncredit
portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses on available-for-sale
securities
|
(971 | ) | (1,476 | ) | ||||
Tax
effect
|
397 | 604 | ||||||
Net
of tax amount
|
(574 | ) | (872 | ) | ||||
Unrecognized
deferred loss pertaining to defined benefit plan
|
53 | 56 | ||||||
Unrecognized
transition asset pertaining to defined benefit plan
|
(2,073 | ) | (2,103 | ) | ||||
Net
components pertaining to defined benefit plan
|
(2,020 | ) | (2,047 | ) | ||||
Tax
effect
|
686 | 695 | ||||||
Net-of-tax
amount
|
(1,334 | ) | (1,352 | ) | ||||
Net
accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
$ | (2,680 | ) | $ | (2,314 | ) |
8
4. SECURITIES
Securities
are summarized as follows:
March 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost |
Gross
Unrealized Gains |
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
$ | 29,868 | $ | 1,912 | $ | - | $ | 31,780 | ||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
36,602 | 1,255 | (87 | ) | 37,770 | |||||||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
66,470 | 3,167 | (87 | ) | 69,550 | |||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
11,000 | 10 | - | 11,010 | ||||||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
1,956 | 109 | - | 2,065 | ||||||||||||
Mutual
Funds
|
6,612 | 5 | (51 | ) | 6,566 | |||||||||||
Common
and preferred stock
|
70 | - | (12 | ) | 58 | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
19,638 | 124 | (63 | ) | 19,699 | |||||||||||
Total
securities
|
$ | 86,108 | $ | 3,291 | $ | (150 | ) | $ | 89,249 |
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost |
Gross
Unrealized Gains |
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
$ | 34,884 | $ | 1,776 | $ | - | $ | 36,660 | ||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
34,360 | 1,353 | (9 | ) | 35,704 | |||||||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
69,244 | 3,129 | (9 | ) | 72,364 | |||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
11,000 | - | (302 | ) | 10,698 | |||||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
1,956 | 114 | - | 2,070 | ||||||||||||
Mutual
Funds
|
6,561 | 1 | (73 | ) | 6,489 | |||||||||||
Common
and preferred stock
|
70 | - | (11 | ) | 59 | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
19,587 | 115 | (386 | ) | 19,316 | |||||||||||
Total
securities
|
$ | 88,831 | $ | 3,244 | $ | (395 | ) | $ | 91,680 |
9
Information
pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous loss position,
follows:
March 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Less Than Twelve Months
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|||||||||||||||
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
$ | (87 | ) | $ | 3,089 | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
(87 | ) | 3,089 | - | - | |||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
- | - | (51 | ) | 1,501 | |||||||||||
Common
and preferred stock
|
(12 | ) | 27 | - | - | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
(12 | ) | 27 | (51 | ) | 1,501 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (99 | ) | $ | 3,116 | $ | (51 | ) | $ | 1,501 | ||||||
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Less Than Twelve Months
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|||||||||||||||
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
$ | (9 | ) | $ | 356 | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
(9 | ) | 356 | - | - | |||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
(302 | ) | 10,698 | - | - | |||||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
(19 | ) | 2,597 | (54 | ) | 1,479 | ||||||||||
Common
and preferred stock
|
(11 | ) | 28 | - | - | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
(332 | ) | 13,323 | (54 | ) | 1,479 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (341 | ) | $ | 13,679 | $ | (54 | ) | $ | 1,479 |
10
At March
31, 2010, four debt securities have gross unrealized losses with aggregate
depreciation of 2.7% from our amortized cost basis, which have existed for less
than twelve months. Because the losses on debt securities are related
to investment grade municipal obligations, the declines are the result of
fluctuations in interest rates and not credit quality, and since it is more
likely than not that we will not be required to sell the securities prior to the
recovery of their amortized costs basis, no declines are deemed to be
other-than-temporary.
At March
31, 2010, one equity security had a gross unrealized loss with aggregate
depreciation of 3.3% from our cost basis existing for greater than twelve months
and was principally related to fluctuations in interest rates. This
loss relates to a mutual fund which invests primarily in short-term debt
instruments and adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities. Because
we do not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that we
will not be required to sell it prior to the recovery of its amortized cost
basis, the loss is deemed temporary.
The
amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at March 31, 2010, by maturity,
are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because certain issuers have the right to call or repay
obligations.
March 31, 2010
|
||||||||
Amortized
Cost |
Fair Value
|
|||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||
Due
in one year or less
|
$ | 6,836 | $ | 6,874 | ||||
Due
after one year through five years
|
36,195 | 38,727 | ||||||
Due
after five years through ten years
|
14,793 | 15,096 | ||||||
Due
after ten years
|
8,646 | 8,853 | ||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
$ | 66,470 | $ | 69,550 | ||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||
Due
after five years through ten years
|
$ | 1,391 | $ | 1,473 | ||||
Due
after ten years
|
11,565 | 11,602 | ||||||
Total
available for sale
|
$ | 12,956 | $ | 13,075 |
Proceeds
from the sale of securities available for sale amounted $5.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. There were no sales of securities
for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Gross
realized gains of $89,000 and gross realized losses of $2,000 were recorded on
the sales of securities during the three months ended March 31,
2009. The tax provision applicable to net realized gains and losses
were $29,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
At March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, one security with a carrying value of $5.0
million was pledged as collateral to the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston to
secure public deposits.
11
5.
|
MORTGAGE-BACKED
SECURITIES
|
Mortgage-backed
securities are summarized as follows:
March 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost |
Gross
Unrealized Gains |
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
residential
|
$ | 196,901 | $ | 5,767 | $ | (141 | ) | $ | 202,527 | |||||||
U.S.
Government guaranteed residential
|
15,836 | 152 | (30 | ) | 15,958 | |||||||||||
Private-label
residential
|
4,650 | 53 | (344 | ) | 4,359 | |||||||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
217,387 | 5,972 | (515 | ) | 222,844 | |||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
residential
|
298,353 | 1,511 | (2,290 | ) | 297,574 | |||||||||||
U.S.
Government guaranteed residential
|
38,033 | 16 | (389 | ) | 37,660 | |||||||||||
Private-label
residential
|
6,914 | - | (1,171 | ) | 5,743 | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
343,300 | 1,527 | (3,850 | ) | 340,977 | |||||||||||
Total
mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 560,687 | $ | 7,499 | $ | (4,365 | ) | $ | 563,821 |
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost |
Gross
Unrealized Gains |
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
Fair
Value |
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
residential
|
$ | 204,484 | $ | 6,111 | $ | (184 | ) | $ | 210,411 | |||||||
U.S.
Government guaranteed residential
|
16,334 | 95 | (143 | ) | 16,286 | |||||||||||
Private-label
residential
|
4,949 | 44 | (435 | ) | 4,558 | |||||||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
225,767 | 6,250 | (762 | ) | 231,255 | |||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
residential
|
289,840 | 2,696 | (2,288 | ) | 290,248 | |||||||||||
U.S.
Government guaranteed residential
|
1,030 | 17 | - | 1,047 | ||||||||||||
Private-label
residential
|
10,368 | - | (1,858 | ) | 8,510 | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
301,238 | 2,713 | (4,146 | ) | 299,805 | |||||||||||
Total
mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 527,005 | $ | 8,963 | $ | (4,908 | ) | $ | 531,060 |
12
Proceeds
from the sale of mortgage-backed securities available for sale amounted to $
48.2 million and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Gross
realized gains of $645,000 and gross realized losses of $459,000 were recorded
on sales of mortgage-backed securities during the three months ended March 31,
2010. The tax provision applicable to net realized gains and losses
were $63,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Information
pertaining to mortgage-backed securities with gross unrealized losses at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 aggregated by investment category and length of
time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position,
follows:
March 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Less Than Twelve Months
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|||||||||||||||
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
residential
|
$ | (119 | ) | $ | 20,004 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 878 | ||||||
U.S.
Government guaranteed residential
|
- | - | (30 | ) | 4,828 | |||||||||||
Private-label
residential
|
- | - | (344 | ) | 3,014 | |||||||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
(119 | ) | 20,004 | (396 | ) | 8,720 | ||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
residential
|
(2,290 | ) | 197,555 | - | - | |||||||||||
U.S.
Government guaranteed residential
|
(389 | ) | 36,668 | - | - | |||||||||||
Private-label
residential
|
- | - | (1,171 | ) | 5,743 | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
(2,679 | ) | 234,223 | (1,171 | ) | 5,743 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (2,798 | ) | $ | 254,227 | $ | (1,567 | ) | $ | 14,463 |
13
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Less Than Twelve Months
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|||||||||||||||
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
residential
|
$ | (159 | ) | $ | 21,227 | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 1,677 | ||||||
U.S.
Government guaranteed residential
|
(143 | ) | 9,760 | - | - | |||||||||||
Private-label
residential
|
- | - | (435 | ) | 3,123 | |||||||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
(302 | ) | 30,987 | (460 | ) | 4,800 | ||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
residential
|
(2,287 | ) | 170,741 | (1 | ) | 128 | ||||||||||
Private-label
residential
|
- | - | (1,858 | ) | 8,510 | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
(2,287 | ) | 170,741 | (1,859 | ) | 8,638 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (2,589 | ) | $ | 201,728 | $ | (2,319 | ) | $ | 13,438 |
At March
31, 2010, fifty government-sponsored and U.S. government guaranteed securities
had gross unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 1.1% from our
amortized cost basis existing for less than twelve months. At March
31, 2010, four government-sponsored and U.S. government guaranteed securities
had gross unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 0.9% from our
amortized cost basis existing for more than twelve months. Because
these losses relate to securities guaranteed by the U.S. government or an agency
thereof, the declines are the result of interest rates and not credit quality,
and it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell the
investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, no declines are
deemed to be other-than-temporary.
At March
31, 2010, four private label mortgage-backed securities have gross unrealized
losses of 14.7% from our amortized cost basis which existed for greater than
twelve months. Management used a third party experienced in analyzing
private-label mortgage-backed securities to determine if credit losses existed
for these securities. The third party incorporated a number of
factors to estimate the performance and possible credit loss of the underlying
assets. These factors include but are not limited to: loans in
various stages of delinquency i.e. 30, 60, 90 days delinquent, loans in
foreclosure, projected prepayment rates (12 constant prepayment rate), projected
default rates (weighted average of 0.64% - 28.6%), severity of loss on defaulted
loans (50% - 55%), current levels of subordination, current credit enhancement
(4.50% - 7.17%), vintage (2006), and geographic location. As a result
of this analysis, two private label mortgage-backed securities were deemed to
have other-than- temporary impairment losses. We had writedowns of
$1.1 million due to other-than-temporary impairment on mortgage-backed
securities during the three months ended March 31, 2010, of which $971,000 was
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss and $100,000 was recognized
as a credit loss and charged to income for the three months ended March 31,
2010. No other-than-temporary impairment losses were recorded on
mortgage-backed securities during the three months ended March 31,
2009.
14
6. SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
Under our
2007 Recognition and Retention Plan and 2007 Stock Option Plan, we may grant up
to 624,041 stock awards and 1,631,682 stock options to our directors, officers,
and employees, respectively.
Stock
award allocations are recorded as unearned compensation based on the market
price at the date of grant. Unearned compensation is amortized over
the vesting period.
We may
grant both incentive and non-statutory stock options. The exercise
price of each option equals the market price of our stock on the date of grant
with a maximum term of ten years.
The fair
value of each option grant is estimated on the grant date using the binomial
option pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions:
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2009
|
||
Expected dividend
yield
|
6.07
|
%
|
Expected
life
|
10
|
years
|
Expected
volatility
|
35.70
|
%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.59
|
%
|
No stock
options were granted in the three months ended March 31, 2010.
All stock
awards and stock options currently vest at 20% per year. At March 31,
2010, 43,941 stock awards and 159,232 stock options were available for future
grants.
Our stock
award and stock option plans activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 is summarized below:
Unvested Stock Awards
Outstanding |
Stock Options Outstanding
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price |
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2009
|
358,573 | $ | 10.00 | 2,223,012 | $ | 8.36 | ||||||||||
Outstanding
at March 31, 2010
|
358,573 | 10.00 | 2,223,012 | 8.36 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2008
|
465,192 | 10.04 | 2,276,223 | 8.15 | ||||||||||||
Granted
|
14,000 | 9.89 | 39,000 | 9.89 | ||||||||||||
Stock
options exercised
|
- | - | (59,721 | ) | 4.39 | |||||||||||
Outstanding
at March 31, 2009
|
479,192 | $ | 10.04 | 2,255,502 | $ | 8.28 |
We
recorded compensation cost related to the stock awards of $289,000 and $383,000
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
We
recorded compensation costs relating to stock options of $199,000, with a
related tax benefit of $53,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2010. We recorded compensation costs relating to stock options of
$273,000, with a related tax benefit of $69,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2009.
15
7. SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS AND LONG-TERM DEBT
We
utilize short-term borrowings and long-term debt as an additional source of
funds to finance our lending and investing activities and to provide liquidity
for daily operations. Short-term borrowings are made up of Federal
Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances with an original maturity of less than one year
as well as customer repurchase agreements, which have an original maturity of
one day. Short-term borrowings issued by the FHLB were $58.5 million
and $58.0 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Customer repurchase agreements were $16.2 million at
March 31, 2010 and $16.5 million at December 31, 2009. A customer
repurchase agreement is an agreement by us to sell to and repurchase from the
customer an interest in specific securities issued by or guaranteed by the
United States Government. This transaction settles immediately on a
same day basis in immediately available funds. Interest paid is
commensurate with other products of equal interest and credit
risk. All of our customer repurchase agreements at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 were held by commercial customers.
Long-term
debt consists of FHLB advances with an original maturity of one year or more as
well as securities sold under repurchase agreements. At March 31,
2010, we had $123.6 million in long-term debt with the FHLB and $81.3 million in
securities sold under repurchase agreements with an approved
broker-dealer. This compares to $127.5 million in long-term debt with
FHLB advances and $81.3 million in securities sold under repurchase agreements
with an approved broker-dealer at December 31, 2009. Customer
repurchase agreements were $5.0 million at both March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009. The securities sold under agreements to repurchase are callable
at the issuer’s option beginning in the year 2010.
8. PENSION
BENEFITS
The
following table provides information regarding net pension benefit costs for the
periods shown:
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 233 | $ | 216 | ||||
Interest
cost
|
193 | 183 | ||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(196 | ) | (169 | ) | ||||
Transition
obligation
|
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Actuarial
loss
|
23 | 34 | ||||||
Net
periodic pension cost
|
$ | 250 | $ | 261 |
We
maintain a pension plan for our eligible employees. We plan to
contribute to the pension plan the amount required to meet the minimum funding
standards under Section 412 of the Internal Revenue Code. Additional
contributions will be made as deemed appropriate by management in conjunction
with the pension plan’s actuaries. We expect to contribute up to
$600,000 to our pension plan in 2010.
9. FAIR
VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Determination
of Fair Value
We use
fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and
liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. The fair value
of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon
quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market
prices for our various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market
prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value
or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by
the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash
flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate
settlement of the instrument.
16
Fair
Value Hierarchy
We group
our assets and liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels,
based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the
reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.
Level 1 –
Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities generally include debt and equity
securities that are traded in an active exchange market. Valuations are obtained
from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving
identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 –
Valuation is based on observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that
are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by
observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities.
Level 3 –
Valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no
market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or
liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose
value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or
similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair
value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
Methods
and assumptions for valuing our financial instruments are set forth
below. Estimated fair values are calculated based on the value
without regard to any premium or discount that may result from concentrations of
ownership of a financial instrument, possible tax ramifications or estimated
transaction cost.
Cash and cash
equivalents - The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments
approximate fair values based on the short-term nature of the
assets.
Interest-bearing
deposits in banks - The carrying amounts of interest-bearing deposits
maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. Fair values of other
interest-bearing deposits are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses
based on current market rates for similar types of deposits.
Securities and
mortgage-backed securities – Fair value of securities are primarily
measured using information from an independent pricing service. The securities
measured at fair value in Level 1 are based on quoted market prices in an active
exchange market. These securities include marketable equity
securities. All other securities are measured at fair value in Level
2 and are based on pricing models that consider standard input factors such as
observable market data, benchmark yields, interest rate volatilities,
broker/dealer quotes, credit spreads and new issue data.
Federal Home Loan
Bank and other stock - These investments are carried at cost which is
their estimated redemption value.
Loans
receivable - For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no
significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.
Fair values for other loans (e.g., commercial real estate and investment
property mortgage loans, commercial and industrial loans) are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses, using market interest rates currently being
offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.
Fair values for non-performing loans are estimated using discounted cash flow
analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.
Accrued
interest - The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair
value.
17
Deposit
liabilities - The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g.,
interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings, and certain types of money
market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at
the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of
variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit
approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate
certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation
that applies market interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a
schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time
deposits.
Short-term
borrowings - For short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days,
carrying values approximate fair values. Fair values of other short-term
borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the
current incremental borrowing rates in the market for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
Long-term
debt - The fair values of our long-term debt are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses based on the current incremental borrowing rates
in the market for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Commitments to
extend credit - The stated value of commitments to extend credit
approximates fair value as the current interest rates for similar commitments do
not differ significantly. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value
also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the
committed rates. Such differences are not considered
significant.
Assets
measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
March 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities
available for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
$ | 5,113 | $ | 1,453 | $ | - | $ | 6,566 | ||||||||
Common
and preferred stock
|
58 | - | - | 58 | ||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
agency debt
|
- | 11,010 | - | 11,010 | ||||||||||||
State
and municipal
|
- | 2,065 | - | 2,065 | ||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
residential mortgage-backed
|
- | 297,574 | - | 297,574 | ||||||||||||
U.S.
Government guaranteed residential mortgage-backed
|
- | 37,660 | - | 37,660 | ||||||||||||
Private-label
residential mortgage-backed
|
- | 5,743 | - | 5,743 | ||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 5,171 | $ | 355,505 | $ | - | $ | 360,676 |
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities
available for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
$ | 5,037 | $ | 1,452 | $ | - | $ | 6,489 | ||||||||
Common
and preferred stock
|
59 | - | - | 59 | ||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
agency debt
|
- | 10,698 | - | 10,698 | ||||||||||||
State
and municipal
|
- | 2,070 | - | 2,070 | ||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
residential mortgage-backed
|
- | 290,248 | - | 290,248 | ||||||||||||
U.S.
Government guaranteed residential mortgage-backed
|
- | 1,047 | - | 1,047 | ||||||||||||
Private-label
residential mortgage-backed
|
- | 8,510 | - | 8,510 | ||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 5,096 | $ | 314,025 | $ | - | $ | 319,121 |
18
Also, we
may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other assets and
liabilities on a non-recurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These
adjustments to fair value usually result from application of
lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual
assets. The following table summarizes the fair value hierarchy used
to determine each adjustment and the carrying value of the related assets at
March 31, 2010 and 2009. Total losses is the change in carrying value
as a result of fair value adjustments related to assets still held at March 31,
2010 and 2009.
At March 31, 2010
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010
|
|||||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total Losses
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 3,080 | $ | 507 | ||||||||
Other
real estate owned
|
- | - | 977 | 227 | ||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 4,057 | $ | 734 | ||||||||
At March 31, 2009
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total Losses
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 4,029 | $ | 1,000 |
The
amount of loans represents the carrying value and related write-down and
valuation allowance of impaired loans for which adjustments are based on the
estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. The fair value of
impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is
generally based on real estate appraisals performed by independent licensed or
certified appraisers. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation
approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the
income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal
process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales
and income data available. Management will discount appraisals as
deemed necessary based on the date of the appraisal and new information deemed
relevant to the valuation. Such adjustments are typically significant
and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.
The resulting losses were recognized in earnings through the provision for loan
losses.
The
amount of other real estate owned represents the carrying value of the
collateral based on the appraised value of the underlying collateral using a
market approach less selling costs. During the three months ended
March 31, 2010, we incurred charges of $227,000 to reduce other real estate
owned to fair value. There were no recognized losses on other real
estate owned for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
There
were no transfers to or from Level 1 and 2 during the quarter ended March 31,
2010.
We did
not measure any liabilities at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis
on the consolidated balance sheets.
19
Fair
value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market
information and information about the financial instrument. These
estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering
for sale at one time our entire holdings of a particular financial instrument.
Where quoted market prices are not available, fair value estimates are
based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic
conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other
factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and
matters of significant judgment. Changes in assumptions could significantly
affect the estimates. The estimated fair values of our financial instruments are
as follows:
March 31, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
Estimated
|
Carrying
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||
Value
|
Fair Value
|
Value
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 16,477 | $ | 16,477 | $ | 28,719 | $ | 28,719 | ||||||||
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Available
for sale
|
19,699 | 19,699 | 19,316 | 19,316 | ||||||||||||
Held
to maturity
|
66,470 | 69,550 | 69,244 | 72,364 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Available
for sale
|
340,977 | 340,977 | 299,805 | 299,805 | ||||||||||||
Held
to maturity
|
217,387 | 222,844 | 225,767 | 231,255 | ||||||||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank of Boston and other restricted stock
|
10,339 | 10,339 | 10,339 | 10,339 | ||||||||||||
Loans-
net
|
459,884 | 447,999 | 469,149 | 474,554 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
5,286 | 5,286 | 5,198 | 5,198 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
661,318 | 656,452 | 647,975 | 649,473 | ||||||||||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
74,749 | 74,745 | 74,499 | 74,499 | ||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
209,876 | 213,941 | 213,845 | 214,669 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
724 | 724 | 730 | 730 |
10. RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 amending FASB ASC Topic
855 to exclude SEC reporting entities from the requirement to disclose the date
on which subsequent events have been evaluated. It further modifies the
requirement to disclose the date on which subsequent events have been evaluated
in reissued financial statements to apply only to such statements that have been
restated to correct an error or to apply U.S. GAAP retrospectively. We have
complied with ASU No. 2010-09.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06- Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures amending Topic 820. The ASU provides for additional disclosures
of transfers between assets and liabilities valued under Level 1 and 2 inputs as
well as additional disclosures regarding those assets and liabilities valued
under Level 3 inputs. The new disclosures are effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for those
provisions addressing Level 3 fair value measurements which provisions are
effective for fiscal years, and periods therein, beginning after
December 15, 2010. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
20
In
June 2009, the FASB amended previous guidance relating to transfers of
financial assets and eliminated the concept of a qualifying special-purpose
entity. This guidance must be applied as of the beginning of each
reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting
period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. This guidance
must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective date. This
guidance amends the requirements for transfers of financial assets and limits
the circumstances in which a transferor uses sale accounting and derecognizes a
transferred financial asset. Additionally, on and after the effective
date, the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity is no longer relevant
for accounting purposes. Therefore, formerly qualifying special-purpose entities
should be evaluated for consolidation by reporting entities on and after the
effective date in accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance. The
disclosure provisions were also amended and apply to transfers that occurred
both before and after the effective date of this guidance. The adoption of this
standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
21
ITEM
2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Overview
We strive
to remain a leader in meeting the financial service needs of the local community
and to provide quality service to the individuals and businesses in the market
areas that we have served since 1853. Historically, we have been a
community-oriented provider of traditional banking products and services to
business organizations and individuals, including products such as residential
and commercial real estate loans, consumer loans and a variety of deposit
products. We meet the needs of our local community through a
community-based and service-oriented approach to banking.
We have
adopted a growth-oriented strategy that has focused on increasing commercial
lending. Our strategy also calls for increasing deposit relationships
and broadening our product lines and services. We believe that this
business strategy is best for our long-term success and viability, and
complements our existing commitment to high-quality customer
service. In connection with our overall growth strategy, we seek
to:
|
·
|
continue
to grow our commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loan
portfolio by targeting businesses in our primary market area and in
northern Connecticut as a means to increase the yield on and diversify our
loan portfolio and build transactional deposit account
relationships;
|
|
·
|
focus
on expanding our retail banking franchise and increase the number of
households served within our market area;
and
|
|
·
|
depending
on market conditions, refer substantially all of the fixed-rate
residential real estate loans to a third-party mortgage company which
underwrites, originates and services these loans in order to diversify our
loan portfolio, increase fee income and reduce interest rate
risk.
|
You
should read the following financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
in the context of this strategy.
|
·
|
Net
income was $1.4 million, or $0.05 per diluted share, for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 compared to $1.2 million, or $0.04 per diluted share for
the same period in 2009.
|
|
·
|
The
provision for loans losses was $500,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2010 compared to $1.2 million for the same period in
2009. The larger provision for loan losses in the 2009 period
was due to an increase in loan charge-offs, primarily pertaining to a
manufacturing commercial loan relationship, and the continued weakening of
the local and national economy.
|
|
·
|
Net
interest income was $7.7 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010, compared to$8.0 million for the same period in 2009. The
net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 2.81% for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, compared to 3.17% for the same period in
2009. The net interest margin was primarily impacted by a
policy change made by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to significantly increase
the buyback of delinquent loans from investment
pools.
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Given our
current business strategy and asset/liability structure, the more critical
policies are accounting for nonperforming loans, the allowance for loan losses
and provision for loan losses, the classification of securities as either held
to maturity or available for sale, other-than-temporary impairment of
securities, and the valuation of deferred taxes. Senior management
has discussed the development and selection of these accounting policies and the
related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board of
Directors.
22
Our
general policy regarding recognition of interest on loans is to discontinue the
accrual of interest when principal or interest payments are delinquent 90 days
or more, or earlier if the loan is considered impaired. Any unpaid amounts
previously accrued on these loans are reversed from income. Subsequent cash
receipts are applied to the outstanding principal balance or to interest income
if, in the judgment of management, collection of principal balance is not in
question. Loans are returned to accrual status when they become current as to
both principal and interest and when subsequent performance reduces the concern
as to the collectability of principal and interest. Loan fees and certain direct
loan origination costs are deferred, and the net fee or cost is recognized as an
adjustment to interest income over the estimated average lives of the related
loans.
The
process of evaluating the loan portfolio, classifying loans and determining the
allowance and provision is described in detail in Part I of our Annual Report
filed on Form 10-K under “Business – Lending Activities -
Allowance for Loan Losses.” Our methodology for assessing the
allocation of the allowance consists of two key components, which are a specific
allowance for impaired loans and a formula allowance for the remainder of the
portfolio. Measurement of impairment can be based on present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the
loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan
is collateral dependent. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires
material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change. The
allocation of the allowance is also reviewed by management based upon our
evaluation of then-existing economic and business conditions affecting our key
lending areas and other conditions, such as new loan products, credit quality
trends (including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing
conditions), collateral values, loan volumes and concentrations, specific
industry conditions within portfolio segments that existed as of the balance
sheet date and the impact that such conditions were believed to have had on the
collectability of the loan portfolio. Although management believes it
has established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels,
if management’s assumptions and judgments prove to be incorrect due to continued
deterioration in economic, real estate and other conditions, and the allowance
for loan losses is not adequate to absorb inherent losses, our earnings and
capital could be significantly and adversely affected.
Securities,
including mortgage-backed securities, which management has the positive intent
and ability to hold until maturity are classified as “held to maturity” and are
carried at amortized cost. Securities, including mortgage-backed securities,
that have been identified as assets for which there is not a positive intent to
hold to maturity are classified as “available for sale” and are carried at fair
value with unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes, excluded from
earnings and reported as a separate component of equity. Accordingly, a
misclassification would have a direct effect on shareholders’ equity. Sales or
reclassification as available for sale (except for certain permitted reasons) of
held to maturity securities may result in the reclassification of all such
securities to available for sale. We have never sold held to maturity securities
or reclassified such securities to available for sale other than in specifically
permitted circumstances. We do not acquire securities or mortgage-backed
securities for purposes of engaging in trading activities.
On a
quarterly basis, we review securities with a decline in fair value below the
amortized cost of the investment to determine whether the decline in fair value
is temporary or other-than-temporary. Declines in the fair value of
marketable equity securities below their cost that are deemed to be
other-than-temporary based on the severity and duration of the impairment are
reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating
other-than-temporary impairment losses for held to maturity and available for
sale debt securities, impairment is required to be recognized (1) if we intend
to sell the security; (2) if it is “more likely than not” that we will be
required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or
(3) if the present value of expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the
entire amortized cost basis. For all impaired held to maturity and
available for sale securities that we intend to sell, or more likely than not
will be required to sell, the full amount of the other-than-temporary impairment
is recognized through earnings. For all other impaired held to
maturity or available for sale securities, credit-related other-than-temporary
impairment is recognized through earnings, while non-credit related other-than-
temporary impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of
applicable taxes.
23
COMPARISON
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT MARCH 31, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
Total
assets increased $8.3 million to $1.2 billion at March 31,
2010. Securities increased $30.4 million to
$654.9 million at March 31, 2010 from $624.5
million at December 31, 2009. The
increase in securities was the result of reinvesting funds from deposits and pay
downs of loans into securities.
The
composition of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is
summarized as follows:
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
$ | 225,515 | $ | 229,061 | ||||
Residential
real estate
|
63,640 | 64,299 | ||||||
Home
equity
|
35,322 | 34,755 | ||||||
Commercial
and industrial
|
139,408 | 145,012 | ||||||
Consumer
|
3,169 | 3,307 | ||||||
Total
loans
|
467,054 | 476,434 | ||||||
Unearned
premiums and deferred loan fees and costs, net
|
381 | 360 | ||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(7,551 | ) | (7,645 | ) | ||||
$ | 459,884 | $ | 469,149 |
Net loans
decreased by $9.2 million to $459.9 million at March 31, 2010 from $469.1
million at December 31, 2009. The decrease in net loans was primarily
the result of decreases in commercial and industrial loans and commercial real
estate loans. Commercial and industrial loans decreased $5.6 million
to $139.4 million at March 31, 2010 from $145.0 million at December 31,
2009. Commercial real estate loans decreased $3.6 million to $225.5
million at March 31, 2010 from $229.1 at December 31, 2009. The
decreases in commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans
were primarily the result of customers decreasing their balances on lines of
credit and normal loan payments and payoffs. Owner occupied
commercial real estate loans totaled $98.5 million at March 31, 2010 and $99.3
million at December 31, 2009, while non-owner occupied commercial real estate
loans totaled $127.0 million at March 31, 2010 and $129.7 million at December
31, 2009.
Nonperforming
loans decreased $1.2 million to $4.3 million at March 31, 2010 compared to $5.5
million at December 31, 2009. This represented 0.92% of total loans
at March 31, 2010 and 1.15% of total loans at December 31, 2009. The
decrease was mainly the result of the charge off of $616,000 in nonperforming
loans primarily due to a single commercial relationship. We set
up a valuation allowance of $650,000 on a relationship of $2.9 million in 2009
and charged off $606,000 of this amount in the first quarter of
2010. The remainder of the decrease in nonperforming loans primarily
consisted of two residential mortgage loan relationships amounting to $524,000
that were transferred into foreclosure during the first quarter of
2010. One mortgage loan relationship of $338,000 was sold during the
first quarter of 2010, resulting in a gain of $7,000.
The
following table presents information regarding nonperforming mortgages, consumer
and other loans and foreclosed real estate as of the dates
indicated. All loans where the interest payment is 90 days or more in
arrears as of the closing date of each month are placed on nonaccrual
status. At March 31, 2010, we had $4.3 million of nonaccrual loans
and $977,000 in foreclosed real estate. At December 31, 2009, we had
$5.5 million of nonaccrual loans and $1.7 million in foreclosed real
estate. If all nonaccrual loans had been performing in accordance
with their terms, we would have earned additional interest income of $61,000 and
$94,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the year ended December
31, 2009, respectively.
24
March 31, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||
Nonaccrual
real estate loans:
|
||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 399 | $ | 784 | ||||
Home
equity
|
21 | 225 | ||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
776 | 782 | ||||||
Total
nonaccrual real estate loans
|
1,196 | 1,791 | ||||||
Other
loans:
|
||||||||
Commercial
and industrial
|
3,081 | 3,675 | ||||||
Consumer
|
2 | 4 | ||||||
Total
nonaccrual consumer and other loans
|
3,083 | 3,679 | ||||||
Total
nonperforming loans
|
4,279 | 5,470 | ||||||
Foreclosed
real estate, net
|
977 | 1,662 | ||||||
Total
nonperforming assets
|
$ | 5 ,256 | $ | 7,132 | ||||
Nonperforming
loans to total loans
|
0.92 | % | 1.15 | % | ||||
Nonperforming
assets to total assets
|
0.44 | 0.60 |
Asset
growth was funded primarily through a $13.3 million increase in deposits to
$661.3 million at March 31, 2010, from $648.0 million at December 31,
2009. The increase in deposits was due to an increase in checking
accounts, regular savings accounts and time deposits. Checking
accounts increased $6.6 million to $157.1 million at March 31, 2010, from $150.5
million at December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily in
noninterest-bearing checking accounts. Regular savings accounts
increased $4.8 million to $109.4 million at March 31, 2010. The
increase in savings accounts was primarily due to an account which pays a higher
interest rate than comparable products of Westfield Financial. Time
deposit accounts increased $3.8 million to $346.5 million at March 31,
2010.
Long-term
debt, which includes FHLB advances and securities sold under repurchase
agreements with an original maturity of one year or more, was $209.8 million at
March 31, 2010 and $213.8 million at December 31, 2009.
Shareholders’
equity at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $245.6 million and $247.3
million, respectively, which represented 20.5 % of total assets as of March 31,
2010 and 20.8% of total assets as of December 31, 2009. The change in
shareholders’ equity was due to the repurchase of 236,814 shares of common stock
for $1.9 million related to the stock repurchase plan and dividends amounting to
$1.4 million. This was partially offset by net income of $1.4 million
and $679,000 related to the accrual of share-based compensation.
COMPARISON
OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND MARCH 31,
2009
General
Net
income was $1.4 million, or $0.05 per diluted share, for the quarter ended March
31, 2010, as compared to $1.2 million, or $0.04 per diluted share, for the same
period in 2009. Net interest and dividend income was $7.7 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and $8.0 million for the same period in
2009.
Net
Interest and Dividend Income
The
following tables set forth the information relating to our average balance at,
and net interest income for, the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and
reflect the average yield on interest-earning assets and average cost of
interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated. Yields and
costs are derived by dividing interest income by the average balance of
interest-earning assets and interest expense by the average balance of
interest-bearing liabilities for the periods shown. The interest rate
spread is the difference between the total average yield on interest-earning
assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest
margin represents tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income as a
percentage of average interest-earning assets. Average balances are
derived from actual daily balances over the periods
indicated. Interest income includes fees earned from making changes
in loan rates and terms and fees earned when the real estate loans are prepaid
or refinanced. For analytical purposes, the interest earned on
tax-exempt assets is adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis to recognize the income
tax savings which facilities comparison between taxable and tax-exempt
assets.
25
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
Balance |
Interest
|
Average
Yield/Cost |
Average
Balance |
Interest
|
Average
Yield/Cost |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans(1)(2)
|
$ | 471,127 | $ | 6,199 | 5.26 | % | $ | 474,669 | $ | 6,474 | 5.46 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities(2)
|
631,333 | 5,929 | 3.76 | 533,861 | 6,755 | 5.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term
investments(3)
|
17,035 | 1 | 0.02 | 21,202 | 4 | 0.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
1,119,495 | 12,129 | 4.33 | 1,029,732 | 13,233 | 5.14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
noninterest-earning assets
|
70,915 | 68,498 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 1,190,410 | $ | 1,098,230 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOW
accounts
|
$ | 71,500 | 232 | 1.30 | $ | 56,644 | 249 | 1.76 | ||||||||||||||||
Savings
accounts
|
110,708 | 230 | 0.83 | 72,146 | 193 | 1.07 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money
market deposit accounts
|
49,184 | 90 | 0.73 | 55,601 | 129 | 0.93 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time
certificates of deposit
|
344,392 | 2,063 | 2.40 | 330,125 | 2,704 | 3.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing deposits
|
575,784 | 2,615 | 514,516 | 3,275 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term
borrowings and long-term debt
|
280,019 | 1,649 | 2.36 | 235,232 | 1,809 | 3.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities
|
855,803 | 4,264 | 1.99 | 749,748 | 5,084 | 2.71 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing
deposits
|
79,848 | 76,601 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
8,101 | 10,966 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
87,949 | 87,567 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
943,752 | 837,315 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
equity
|
246,658 | 260,915 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$ | 1,190,410 | $ | 1,098,230 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less:
Tax-equivalent adjustment(2)
|
(174 | ) | (131 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest and dividend income
|
$ | 7,691 | $ | 8,018 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest rate spread(4)
|
2.34 | 2.43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin(5)
|
2.81 | % | 3.17 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio
of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing
liabilities
|
130.8 | X | 137.3 | X |
(1)
|
Loans,
including non-accrual loans, are net of deferred loan origination costs,
and unadvanced funds.
|
(2)
|
Securities,
loan income and net interest income are presented on a tax-equivalent
basis using a tax rate of 34%. The tax-equivalent adjustment is
deducted from tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income to agree to
the amount reported in the statements of
income.
|
(3)
|
Short-term
investments include federal funds
sold.
|
(4)
|
Net
interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted
average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of
interest-bearing liabilities.
|
(5)
|
Net
interest margin represents tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income
as a percentage of average interest earning
assets.
|
26
The
following table shows how changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected our
interest income and interest expense during the periods
indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect
to:
·
|
Interest
income changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume
multiplied by prior rate);
|
·
|
Interest
income changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied
by current volume); and
|
·
|
The
net change.
|
The
changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been
allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to
rate.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 compared
|
||||||||||||
to Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) Due to
|
||||||||||||
Volume
|
Rate
|
Net
|
||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets
|
||||||||||||
Loans
(1)
|
$ | (48 | ) | $ | (227 | ) | $ | (275 | ) | |||
Securities
(1)
|
1,233 | (2,059 | ) | (826 | ) | |||||||
Short-term
investment
|
(1 | ) | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||
Total
interest earning assets
|
1,184 | (2,288 | ) | (1,104 | ) | |||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities
|
||||||||||||
NOW
accounts
|
65 | (82 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||
Savings
accounts
|
103 | (66 | ) | 37 | ||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
(15 | ) | (24 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||||
Time
deposits
|
117 | (758 | ) | (641 | ) | |||||||
Short-term
borrowing and long-term debt
|
344 | (504 | ) | (160 | ) | |||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
614 | (1,434 | ) | (820 | ) | |||||||
Change
in net interest and dividend income
|
$ | 570 | $ | (854 | ) | $ | (284 | ) |
(1)
|
Securities
and loan income and net interest income are presented on a tax-equivalent
basis using a tax rate of 34%. The tax-equivalent adjustment is deducted
from tax-equivalent net interest
income.
|
Net
interest and dividend income decreased $300,000 to $7.7 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, from $8.0 million for the same period in
2009. The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 2.81%
for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to 3.17% for the same
period in 2009. Interest and dividend income, on a tax-equivalent
basis, decreased $1.1 million to $12.1 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010, from $13.2 million for the same period in 2009. The average
yield on interest-earning assets decreased 81 basis points to 4.33% for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, from 5.14% for the same period in
2009.
The net
interest margin and average yield on interest-earning assets were primarily
impacted by a policy change made by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to increase the
buyback of delinquent loans from investment pools. The policy change
from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has resulted in larger than normal principal
payments on the mortgage-backed securities owned by us, which consequently
impacted the yield.
The
decrease in interest income was partially offset by a decrease in interest
expense. Interest expense decreased $820,000 to $4.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, from $5.1 million for the same period in
2009. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 72
basis points to 1.99% for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from 2.71% for
the same period in 2009, as a result of the enduring low interest rate
environment.
27
Provision
for Loan Losses
The
amount that we provided for loan losses during the three months ended March 31,
2010 was based upon the changes that occurred in the loan portfolio during that
same period. The changes in the loan portfolio, described in detail below,
include an increase in charge-offs, primarily pertaining to a manufacturing
commercial loan relationship, and the continued weakening of the local and
national economy. After evaluating these factors, we provided
$500,000 for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to
$1.2 million for the same period in 2009. The allowance was $7.6
million at March 31, 2010 and $7.3 million at March 31, 2009. The
allowance for loan losses was 1.64% of total loans at March 31, 2010 and 1.54%
at March 31, 2009.
Net
charge-offs were $594,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2010. This was comprised of charge-offs of $616,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, partially offset by recoveries of $22,000 for the
same period. We set up a valuation allowance of $650,000 on a
manufacturing commercial loan relationship of $2.9 million in 2009 and charged
off $606,000 of this amount in the first quarter of 2010.
Net
charge-offs were $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009. This was comprised of charge-offs of $2.7 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, partially offset by recoveries of $11,000 for the
same period. The higher charge-offs in the 2009 period were primarily
the result a single manufacturing commercial loan relationship of $2.1
million. The loan relationship was included in the allowance for loan
losses as a specific valuation allowance at December 31, 2008 and was
charged-off at March 31, 2009.
Although
management believes it has established and maintained the allowance for loan
losses at adequate levels, future adjustments may be necessary if economic, real
estate and other conditions differ substantially from the current operating
environment.
Noninterest
Income
Noninterest
income decreased $196,000 to $943,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
from $1.1 million for the same period in 2009. Service charge and fee
income decreased $217,000 to $492,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
compared to the same period in 2009. This was primarily the result of
a decrease of $147,000 in fees received from the third-party mortgage
program. In the 2009 period, we experienced a higher level of
mortgage referrals due to a decrease in interest rates. In the 2010
period, residential loan demand has moderated but of greater significance, we
have begun to buy back more loans from the third-party mortgage
company. As a result, we forgo receiving referral fee income on
these loans but instead earn interest income for the life of the
loans.
Net gains
on the sales of securities were $186,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2010, compared to $87,000 for the same period in 2009. On February
10, 2010, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac disclosed their intent to significantly
increase their buy backs of seriously delinquent (120 days or more) loans from
mortgage-backed security loan trusts.
Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac did not provide delinquency information on specific
mortgage-backed securities. We therefore analyzed our mortgage-backed
securities to identify those with characteristics with a greater likelihood of
containing delinquent loans. As a result of such changes, we sold
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage-backed securities totaling $45.9 million,
which resulted in a net gain of $379,000 in the first quarter of
2010. This was partially offset by a loss of $193,000 on the sale of
a private-label mortgage-backed security during the three months ended March 31,
2010.
Noninterest
Expense
Noninterest
expense for both the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $6.4
million. Salaries and benefits decreased $307,000 to $3.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010. This was primarily the result of a
decrease of $206,000 in share-based compensation. The 2009 period
included $167,000 in expense related to the acceleration of vesting for
employees that reached retirement eligibility age. The decrease in
salaries and benefits was partially offset by a $243,000 increase in OREO
expense. This was primarily due to write downs on foreclosed
properties of $227,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
28
Income
Taxes
For the
three months ended March 31, 2010, we had a tax provision of $402,000 as
compared to $394,000 for the same period in 2009. The effective tax
rate was 22.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 24.6% for the same
period in 2009. The decrease in effective tax rate from March 31,
2009 is due primarily to maintaining the same level of tax-advantaged income
such as BOLI and tax-exempt municipal obligations.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The term
“liquidity” refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to fund
loan originations, loan purchases, withdrawals of deposits and operating
expenses. Our primary sources of liquidity are deposits, scheduled
amortization and prepayments of loan principal and mortgage-backed securities,
maturities and calls of securities and funds provided by
operations. We also can borrow funds from the FHLB based on eligible
collateral of loans and securities. Our maximum additional borrowing
capacity from the FHLB at March 31, 2010 was $ 90.5 million.
Liquidity
management is both a daily and long-term function of business
management. The measure of a company’s liquidity is its ability to
meet its cash commitments at all times with available cash or by conversion of
other assets to cash at a reasonable price. Loan repayments and
maturing investment securities are a relatively predictable source of
funds. However, deposit flow, calls of securities and repayments of
loans and mortgage-backed securities are strongly influenced by interest rates,
general and local economic conditions and competition in the
marketplace. These factors reduce the predictability of the timing of
these sources of funds. Management believes that we have sufficient
liquidity to meet its current operating needs.
At March
31, 2010, we exceeded each of the applicable regulatory capital
requirements. As of March 31, 2010, the most recent notification from
the Office of Thrift Supervision (the “OTS”) categorized us as “well
capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action. To be categorized as “well capitalized” we must maintain
minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set
forth in the following table. There are no conditions or events since
that notification that management believes would change our
category. Our actual capital ratios of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 are also presented in the following table.
29
Actual
|
Minimum For Capital
Adequacy Purpose |
Minimum To Be Well
Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
March
31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Capital (to
Risk Weighted Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ | 255,806 | 38.41 | % | $ | 53,438 | 8.00 | % | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||
Bank
|
238,837 | 36.06 | 53,149 | 8.00 | $ | 66,436 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital (to
Risk Weighted Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
248,255 | 37.27 | 26,719 | 4.00 | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank
|
232,002 | 35.02 | 26,574 | 4.00 | 39,861 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital (to
Adjusted Total Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
248,255 | 20.65 | 48,081 | 4.00 | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank
|
232,002 | 19.51 | 47,564 | 4.00 | 59,456 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tangible
Equity (to
Tangible Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
N/A | - | N/A | - | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank
|
232,002 | 19.56 | 17,837 | 1.50 | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
December
31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Capital (to
Risk Weighted Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ | 257,209 | 38.07 | % | $ | 54,052 | 8.00 | % | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||
Bank
|
236,940 | 35.29 | 53,706 | 8.00 | $ | 67,132 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital (to
Risk Weighted Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
249,564 | 36.94 | 27,026 | 4.00 | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank
|
230,109 | 34.28 | 26,853 | 4.00 | 40,279 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital (to
Adjusted Total Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
249,564 | 20.92 | 47,713 | 4.00 | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank
|
230,109 | 19.56 | 47,059 | 4.00 | 58,824 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tangible
Equity (to
Tangible Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
N/A | - | N/A | - | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank
|
230,109 | 19.56 | 17,647 | 1.50 | N/A | - |
We also
have outstanding, at any time, a significant number of commitments to extend
credit and provide financial guarantees to third parties. These
arrangements are subject to strict credit control
assessments. Guarantees specify limits to our
obligations. Because many commitments and almost all guarantees
expire without being funded in whole or in part, the contract amounts are not
estimates of future cash flows. We are obligated under leases for
certain of our branches and equipment. A summary of lease obligations
and credit commitments at March 31, 2010 follows:
30
After
1 Year
|
After
3 Years
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Within
|
But Within
|
But Within
|
After
|
|||||||||||||||||
1 Year
|
3 Years
|
5 Years
|
5 Years
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Lease
Obligations
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
lease obligations
|
$ | 536 | $ | 949 | $ | 855 | $ | 10,059 | $ | 12,399 | ||||||||||
Borrowings
and Debt
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank
|
91,500 | 50,300 | 30,150 | 10,000 | 181,950 | |||||||||||||||
Securities
sold under
|
||||||||||||||||||||
agreements
to repurchase
|
21,375 | 5,000 | 37,800 | 38,500 | 102,675 | |||||||||||||||
Total
borrowings and debt
|
112,875 | 55,300 | 67,950 | 48,500 | 284,625 | |||||||||||||||
Credit
Commitments
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Available
lines of credit
|
65,962 | - | - | 18,379 | 84,341 | |||||||||||||||
Other
loan commitments
|
12,565 | 450 | 1,788 | - | 14,803 | |||||||||||||||
Letters
of credit
|
2,989 | - | - | 506 | 3,495 | |||||||||||||||
Total
credit commitments
|
81,516 | 450 | 1,788 | 18,885 | 102,639 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 194,927 | $ | 56,699 | $ | 70,593 | $ | 77,444 | $ | 399,663 |
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not
have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to
have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
ITEM
3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Quantitative
measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to
maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table above) of total and
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets and to adjusted total
assets. Management believes, as of March 31, 2010, that we met all
capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject. As of March
31, 2010, the most recent notification from the OTS categorized us as “well
capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action.
Management
uses a simulation model to monitor interest rate risk. This model
reports the net interest income at risk primarily under seven different interest
rate environments. Specifically, net interest income is measured in
one scenario that assumes no change in interest rates, and six scenarios where
interest rates increase 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points, and decrease 100 and
200 basis points immediately following the current consolidated financial
statements. Management believes that the risk associated with a 100
or 200 basis point drop in interest rates is mitigated by the already
historically low rate environment.
The
changes in interest income and interest expense due to changes in interest rates
reflect the rate sensitivity of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. For example, in a rising interest rate environment, the
interest income from an adjustable rate loan is likely to increase depending on
its repricing characteristics while the interest income from a fixed rate loan
would not increase until the funds were repaid and loaned out at a higher
interest rate.
31
The table
below sets forth as of March 31, 2011 the estimated changes in net interest and
dividend income that would result from incremental changes in interest rates
over the applicable twelve-month period.
For the Twelve Months Ending March 31, 2011
|
||||||||
Changes in Interest Rates
(Basis Points) |
Net Interest and
Dividend Income |
% Change
|
||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||
400
|
34,954 | 6.3 | % | |||||
300
|
34,607 | 5.2 | % | |||||
200
|
33,849 | 2.9 | % | |||||
100
|
33,586 | 2.1 | % | |||||
0
|
32,883 | 0.0 | % | |||||
-100
|
31,791 | -3.3 | % | |||||
-200
|
28,013 | -14.8 | % |
Management
believes that there have been no significant changes in market risk since March
31, 2010.
The
income simulation analysis was based upon a variety of
assumptions. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, asset
mix, prepayment speeds, the timing and level of interest rates, and the shape of
the yield curve. As market conditions vary from the assumptions in
the income simulation analysis, actual results will differ. As a
result, the income simulation analysis does not serve as a forecast of net
interest income, nor do the calculations represent any actions that management
may undertake in response to changes in interest rates.
ITEM
4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and
Procedures.
Management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated
the effectiveness of Westfield Financial’s disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based upon the evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure
controls and procedures were effective, to ensure that information required to
be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is (i)
recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and (ii)
accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely discussion
regarding required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified
in connection with the evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter
that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
32
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM
1A. RISK
FACTORS
For a
summary of risk factors relevant to our operations, see Part 1, Item 1A, “Risk
Factors” in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There are no
material changes in the risk factors relevant to our operations.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The
following table sets forth information with respect to purchases made by us of
our common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Period
|
Total number
of shares purchased |
Average price
paid per share ($) |
Total number of
shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs |
Maximum
number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program (1) |
||||||||||||
January
1 - 31, 2010
|
46,807 | 8.15 | 46,807 | 542,041 | ||||||||||||
February
1 - 28, 2010
|
118,559 | 8.17 | 118,559 | 423,482 | ||||||||||||
March
1 - 31, 2010
|
71,448 | 8.35 | 71,448 | 352,034 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
236,814 | 8.22 | 236,814 | 352,034 |
(1)
|
In
January 2008, the Board of Directors voted to authorize the commencement
of a repurchase program (“Repurchase Program”) authorizing the Company to
repurchase up to 3,194,000 shares, or ten percent of its outstanding
shares of common stock. The Repurchase Program will continue until it is
completed. The repurchases may be made from time to time at the discretion
of management of the Company.
|
There
were no sales by us of unregistered securities during the three months ended
March 31, 2010.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM
4. REMOVED
AND RESERVED
ITEM
5. OTHER
INFORMATION
None.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
The
exhibits required to be filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are
listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto and are incorporated herein by
reference.
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Westfield
Financial, Inc.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
By:
|
/s/ James C. Hagan
|
|
James
C. Hagan
|
||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
By:
|
/s/ Leo R. Sagan, Jr.
|
|
Leo
R. Sagan, Jr.
|
||
Vice
President/Chief Financial
Officer
|
May 7,
2010
34
EXHIBIT
INDEX
2.1
|
Amended
and Restated Plan of Conversion and Stock Issuance of Westfield Mutual
Holding Company, Westfield Financial, Inc. and Westfield Bank
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registration Statement
No. 333-137024 on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 31, 2006).
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Organization of Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.3 of the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 5, 2007).
|
3.2
|
Bylaws
of Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of
the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January
5, 2007).
|
4.1
|
Form
of Stock Certificate of Westfield Financial, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registration Statement No. 333-137024 on
Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31,
2006).
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002*
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002*
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002*
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of
2002*
|
* Filed
herewith.
35