Whitestone REIT - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
|
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
Washington,
D.C. 20549
|
FORM
10-Q
|
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission
File Number 000-50256
|
WHITESTONE
REIT
|
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
Maryland
|
76-0594970
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(IRS
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
2600
South Gessner, Suite 500
Houston,
Texas 77063
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(713)
827-9595
|
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) x
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
The
number of the registrant’s Common Shares of Beneficial Interest outstanding at
November 14, 2008, was 9,707,307.
Page
|
||||
PART
I--FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
2
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2008 (Unaudited) and
December 31, 2007 (Revised)
|
2
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
(Revised)
|
3
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (Revised)
|
5
|
|||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
6
|
|||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
19
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
31
|
||
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
31
|
||
PART
II--OTHER INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
32
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
32
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
32
|
||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
32
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
32
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
32
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
33
|
i
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
(revised)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Real
estate assets, at cost:
|
||||||||
Property
|
$ | 179,844 | $ | 163,923 | ||||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(28,729 | ) | (25,855 | ) | ||||
Net
operating real estate assets
|
151,115 | 138,068 | ||||||
Properties
under development, including land
|
— | 8,392 | ||||||
Properties
- discontinued operations
|
— | 7,932 | ||||||
Total
real estate assets
|
151,115 | 154,392 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
5,257 | 10,811 | ||||||
Accrued
rent and accounts receivable, net
|
4,378 | 5,386 | ||||||
Unamortized
lease commissions and loan costs
|
3,098 | 2,839 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
3,699 | 1,367 | ||||||
Other
assets - discontinued operations
|
— | 349 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 167,547 | $ | 175,144 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Notes
payable
|
$ | 88,633 | $ | 83,461 | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
6,639 | 6,560 | ||||||
Tenants’
security deposits
|
1,630 | 1,598 | ||||||
Dividends
and distributions payable
|
1,657 | 2,371 | ||||||
Other
liabilities - discontinued operations
|
— | 272 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
98,559 | 94,262 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies:
|
||||||||
Minority
interests of unit holders in Operating Partnership; 4,739,886 and
5,808,337 units at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively
|
21,858 | 28,039 | ||||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
shares, $0.001 par value per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; none
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
shares, $0.001 par value per share; 400,000,000 shares authorized;
9,707,307 and 10,001,269 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively
|
10 | 10 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
71,667 | 72,273 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(21,995 | ) | (19,210 | ) | ||||
Treasury
shares, at cost
|
(2,479 | ) | — | |||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(73 | ) | (230 | ) | ||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
47,130 | 52,843 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$ | 167,547 | $ | 175,144 |
See notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(LOSS)
(Unaudited)
Three
Months ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||
(revised)
|
(revised)
|
|||||||||||||||
Property
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||
Rental
revenues
|
$ | 6,165 | $ | 6,129 | $ | 18,628 | $ | 17,805 | ||||||||
Tenants’
reimbursements and other property revenues
|
1,478 | 1,253 | 4,521 | 3,883 | ||||||||||||
Total
property revenues
|
7,643 | 7,382 | 23,149 | 21,688 | ||||||||||||
Property
expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Property
operation and maintenance
|
2,396 | 2,194 | 6,707 | 6,152 | ||||||||||||
Real
estate taxes
|
952 | 913 | 2,885 | 2,629 | ||||||||||||
Total
property expenses
|
3,348 | 3,107 | 9,592 | 8,781 | ||||||||||||
Other
expenses (income)
|
||||||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
1,100 | 1,414 | 5,233 | 4,898 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,912 | 1,544 | 5,259 | 4,621 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
1,508 | 1,375 | 4,335 | 4,007 | ||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
(30 | ) | (157 | ) | (154 | ) | (449 | ) | ||||||||
Total
other expenses
|
4,490 | 4,176 | 14,673 | 13,077 | ||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before loss on disposal of assets,
minority interest, change in fair value of derivative instrument and
income taxes
|
(195 | ) | 99 | (1,116 | ) | (170 | ) | |||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(53 | ) | (46 | ) | (163 | ) | (152 | ) | ||||||||
Gain
(loss) on sale or disposal of assets
|
(37 | ) | 148 | (137 | ) | 148 | ||||||||||
Change
in fair value of derivative instrument
|
— | (44 | ) | — | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss
(income) allocated to minority interests
|
112 | (59 | ) | 523 | 76 | |||||||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
(173 | ) | 98 | (893 | ) | (127 | ) | |||||||||
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
— | 118 | (188 | ) | 470 | |||||||||||
Gain
on sale of properties from discontinued operations
|
— | — | 3,619 | — | ||||||||||||
Income
allocated to minority interests from discontinued
operations
|
— | (44 | ) | (1,248 | ) | (176 | ) | |||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (173 | ) | $ | 172 | $ | 1,290 | $ | 167 |
See notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(LOSS)
(Unaudited)
Three
Months ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||
(revised)
|
(revised)
|
|||||||||||||||
Earnings
per share - basic and diluted
|
||||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
$ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | |||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
— | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.02 | |||||||
Dividends
declared per common share
|
$ | 0.1125 | $ | 0.1500 | $ | 0.4125 | $ | 0.4500 | ||||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
9,707 | 10,001 | 9,871 | 9,998 | ||||||||||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (173 | ) | $ | 172 | $ | 1,290 | $ | 167 | |||||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
income on cash flow hedging activities
|
259 | — | 157 | — | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$ | 86 | $ | 172 | $ | 1,447 | $ | 167 |
See notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine
Months ended September 30,
|
||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(revised)
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
loss from continuing operations
|
$ | (893 | ) | $ | (127 | ) | ||
Net
income from discontinued operations
|
2,183 | 294 | ||||||
1,290 | 167 | |||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
5,259 | 4,621 | ||||||
Minority
interests in Operating Partnership
|
(523 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||
Loss
(gain) on sale or disposal of assets
|
137 | (148 | ) | |||||
Bad
debt expense
|
400 | 442 | ||||||
Change
in fair value of derivative instrument
|
— | 29 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Escrows
and acquisition deposits
|
— | (254 | ) | |||||
Accrued
rent and accounts receivable
|
610 | (1,018 | ) | |||||
Unamortized
lease commissions and loan costs
|
(761 | ) | (763 | ) | ||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
(24 | ) | 47 | |||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(292 | ) | (1,633 | ) | ||||
Tenants’
security deposits
|
32 | 164 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
3,945 | 1,284 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities of discontinued
operations
|
8 | 607 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Additions
to real estate
|
(4,184 | ) | (1,423 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from disposition of real estate assets
|
— | 275 | ||||||
Repayment
of note receivable
|
— | 604 | ||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(4,184 | ) | (544 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities of discontinued
operations
|
(8 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Dividends
paid on common shares
|
(4,459 | ) | (4,466 | ) | ||||
Distributions
paid to OP unit holders
|
(2,555 | ) | (2,648 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common shares
|
— | 261 | ||||||
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
22,767 | 22,769 | ||||||
Repayments
of notes payable
|
(17,595 | ) | (5,522 | ) | ||||
Payments
of loan deposits
|
(2,308 | ) | — | |||||
Payments
of loan origination costs
|
(1,165 | ) | (147 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(5,315 | ) | 10,247 | |||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(5,554 | ) | 11,582 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
10,811 | 8,298 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 5,257 | $ | 19,880 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | 4,333 | $ | 4,047 | ||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
224 | — | ||||||
Non
cash investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
Disposal
of fully depreciated real estate
|
359 | 766 | ||||||
Financed
insurance premiums
|
464 | 458 | ||||||
Disposal
of real estate in settlement of lawsuit
|
7,844 | — |
See notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
1.
Interim Financial Statements
The
condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report are
unaudited; however, amounts presented in the balance sheet as of December 31,
2007 are derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of
Whitestone REIT (“Whitestone”, “us”, “we”, and “our”), at that date. The
unaudited financial statements at September 30, 2008 have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information on a basis consistent with the annual audited consolidated
financial statements and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they
do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
The
condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect all
adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial position of Whitestone REIT, and our subsidiaries
as of September 30, 2008 and results of operations for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and cash flows for the nine month
period ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. All of these adjustments are of a
normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the interim period are
not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year. The
statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and notes which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
Business.
Whitestone was formed as a real estate investment trust, pursuant to the Texas
Real Estate Investment Trust Act on August 20, 1998. In July 2004, Whitestone
changed its state of organization from Texas to Maryland pursuant to a merger of
Whitestone directly with and into a Maryland real estate investment trust formed
for the sole purpose of the reorganization and the conversion of each
outstanding common share of beneficial interest of the Texas entity into 1.42857
common shares of beneficial interest of the Maryland entity. Whitestone serves
as the general partner of Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership, L.P. (the
“Operating Partnership”), which was formed on December 31, 1998 as a Delaware
limited partnership. Whitestone currently conducts substantially all of its
operations and activities through the Operating Partnership. As the general
partner of the Operating Partnership, Whitestone has the exclusive power to
manage and conduct the business of the Operating Partnership, subject to certain
customary exceptions. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we owned
and operated 35 and 37 retail, warehouse and office properties, respectively, in
and around Houston, Dallas, San Antonio and Phoenix.
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of Consolidation. We are the sole general partner of the Operating
Partnership and possess full legal control and authority over the operations of
the Operating Partnership. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we
owned a majority of the partnership interests in the Operating Partnership.
Consequently, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Operating Partnership. All significant inter-company
balances have been eliminated. Minority interest in the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements represents the share of equity and earnings of
the Operating Partnership allocable to holders of partnership interests other
than us. Net income or loss is allocated to minority interests based on the
weighted-average percentage ownership of the Operating Partnership during the
year. Issuance of additional common shares of beneficial interest in Whitestone
(“common shares”) and units of limited partnership interest in the Operating
Partnership that are convertible into common shares on a one for one basis (“OP
Units”) changes the ownership interests of both the minority interests and
Whitestone.
Basis
of Accounting. Our financial records are maintained on the accrual basis
of accounting whereby revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are
recorded when incurred.
6
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
Use
of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Significant estimates that we use include the
estimated useful lives for depreciable and amortizable assets and costs, the
estimated allowance for doubtful accounts, and the estimated fair value of
interest rate swaps. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Reclassifications.
We have reclassified certain prior fiscal year amounts in the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in order to be
consistent with the current fiscal year presentation. These reclassifications
had no effect on net income (loss). Approximately 64,000 shares (the “Shares”)
issued on or after October 2, 2006 to our shareholders under our dividend
reinvestment plan have been reclassified, reducing shareholders’ equity and
increasing current liabilities on our condensed consolidated balance sheet for
the period ended December 31, 2007. The Shares have a recorded value of
approximately $0.6 million or $9.50 per share.
Revenue
Recognition. All leases on our properties are classified as operating
leases, and the related rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the terms of the related leases. Differences between rental income earned
and amounts due per the respective lease agreements are capitalized or charged,
as applicable, to accrued rent receivable. Percentage rents are recognized as
rental income when the thresholds upon which they are based have been met.
Recoveries from tenants for taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses are
recognized as revenues in the period the corresponding costs are incurred. We
have established an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of
tenant accounts receivable which is estimated to be uncollectible.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents. We consider all highly liquid securities purchased
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash
and cash equivalents at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 consist of
demand deposits at commercial banks and money market funds.
Development
Properties. Land, buildings and improvements are recorded at cost.
Expenditures related to the development of real estate are carried at cost which
includes capitalized carrying charges, acquisition costs and development costs.
Carrying charges, primarily interest, real estate taxes and loan acquisition
costs, and direct and indirect development costs related to buildings under
construction, are capitalized as part of construction in progress. The
capitalization of such costs ceases when the property, or any completed portion,
becomes available for occupancy. We capitalize acquisition costs once the
acquisition of the property becomes probable. Prior to that time, we expense
these costs as acquisition expense. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, interest in the amount of $0.1 million and $0.4 million,
respectively, was capitalized on properties under development. No such amounts
were capitalized in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007.
Acquired
Properties and Acquired Lease Intangibles. We account for real estate
acquisitions pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)
No. 141, “Business
Combinations.” Accordingly, we allocate the purchase price of the
acquired properties to land, building and improvements, identifiable intangible
assets and to the acquired liabilities based on their respective fair values.
Identifiable intangibles include amounts allocated to acquired out-of-market
leases, the value of in-place leases and customer relationship value, if any. We
determine fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize
appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information.
Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the
historical operating results, known trends and specific market and economic
conditions that may affect the property. Factors considered by management in our
analysis of determining the as-if-vacant property value include an estimate of
carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering market
conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs,
management includes real estate taxes, insurance and estimates of lost rentals
at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, tenant demand and other
economic conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases
including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related
expenses. Intangibles related to out-of-market leases and in-place lease value
are recorded as acquired lease intangibles and are amortized as an adjustment to
rental revenue or amortization expense, as appropriate, over the remaining terms
of the underlying leases. Premiums or discounts on acquired out-of-market debt
are amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of such
debt.
7
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
Depreciation. Depreciation is
computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of 5 to
39 years for the buildings and improvements. Tenant improvements are depreciated
using the straight-line method over the life of the improvement or remaining
term of the lease, whichever is shorter.
Impairment.
We review our properties for impairment annually or whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets,
including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. We
determine whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated
future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the
estimated residual value of the property, with the carrying cost of the
property. If impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by
which the carrying value of the property exceeds its fair value. No impairment
in value has been recorded for either of the three or nine month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007.
Accrued
Rent and Accounts Receivable. Included in accrued rent and accounts
receivable are base rents, tenant reimbursements and receivables attributable to
recording rents on a straight-line basis. An allowance for the uncollectible
portion of accrued rents and accounts receivable is determined based upon
customer credit-worthiness (including expected recovery of our claim with
respect to any tenants in bankruptcy), historical bad debt levels, and current
economic trends. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had an
allowance for uncollectible accounts of $1.2 million and $0.9 million,
respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we
recorded bad debt expense in the amount of $0.4 million and $0.4 million,
respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we
recorded bad debt expense in the amount of $0.2 million and $0.1 million,
respectively. These amounts relate to tenant receivables that we specifically
identified as potentially uncollectible based on our assessment of the tenant’s
credit-worthiness. Bad debt expenses and any related recoveries are included in
property operation and maintenance expense in the consolidated statements of
operations.
Unamortized
Lease Commissions and Loan Costs. Leasing commissions are amortized using
the straight-line method over the terms of the related lease agreements. Loan
costs are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of the loans,
which approximates the interest method. Costs allocated to in-place leases whose
terms differ from market terms related to acquired properties are amortized over
the remaining life of the respective leases.
Prepaid
Expenses and Other Assets. Prepaid expenses and other assets include
escrows established pursuant to certain mortgage financing arrangements for real
estate taxes and insurance. Deposits held in connection with certain loans
closed subsequent to September 30, 2008 are also included in prepaid expenses
and other assets as of September 30, 2008. See note 7 and note 14 of the
condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion on
loans.
Income Taxes. Federal - We are qualified as a real estate investment
trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”)
and are therefore not subject to federal income taxes provided we meet all
conditions specified by the Code for retaining our REIT status. We believe we
have continuously met these conditions since reaching 100 shareholders in
1999.
Income
Taxes. State - In May 2006, the State of Texas adopted House Bill 3,
which modified the state’s franchise tax structure, replacing the previous tax
based on capital or earned surplus with one based on margin (often referred to
as the “Texas Margin Tax”) effective with franchise tax reports filed on or
after January 1, 2008. The Texas Margin Tax is computed by applying the
applicable tax rate (1% for us) to the profit margin, which, generally, will be
determined for us as total revenue less a 30% standard deduction. Although House
Bill 3 states that the Texas Margin Tax is not an income tax, SFAS No. 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes,”
(“SFAS No. 109”) applies to the Texas Margin Tax. We have recorded a
margin tax provision of $0.05 million and $0.16 million for the Texas Margin Tax
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Additionally, we recorded a margin tax provision of $0.05 million and $0.15 for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
8
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
Derivative
Instruments. We have initiated a program designed to manage exposure to
interest rate fluctuations by entering into financial derivative instruments.
The primary objective of this program is to comply with debt covenants on our
revolving credit facility. We do not use derivative financial instruments for
speculative or trading purposes. We entered into an interest rate swap agreement
with respect to amounts borrowed under certain of our revolving credit
facilities, which effectively exchanges existing obligations to pay interest
based on floating rates for obligations to pay interest based on fixed London
Interbank Offered Rates (“LIBOR”).
We
have adopted SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities,” (“SFAS No. 133”) as subsequently amended by SFAS No. 138,
“Accounting for Certain
Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities,” and SFAS No. 149,
“Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” which require for items
appropriately classified as cash flow hedges that changes in the market value of
the instrument and in the market value of the hedged item be recorded as other
comprehensive income or loss with the exception of the portion of the hedged
items that are considered ineffective. The derivative instruments are reported
at fair value as other assets or other liabilities as applicable. As of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we have a $70 million dollar interest
rate swap which has been designated as a cash flow hedge. The fair value of this
interest rate swap is approximately ($0.1) million and ($0.4) million, at
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and is included in
accounts payable and accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated balance
sheets. Additionally, for a previous interest rate swap which was not designated
as a cash flow hedge, approximately $0.04 million and $0.03 million is included
in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
respectively.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments. Our financial instruments consist
primarily of cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, derivative
instruments, accounts payable and notes payable. The carrying value of cash,
cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable are representative of
their respective fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
The fair value of our debt obligations is representative of its carrying value
based upon current rates offered for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
The fair value of interest rate swaps (used for hedging purposes) is the
estimated amount that the financial institution would receive or pay to
terminate the swap agreements at the reporting date, taking into account current
interest rates and the current credit worthiness of the swap
counterparties.
Comprehensive
Income (Loss). We follow SFAS No. 130,
“Reporting Comprehensive
Income,” which establishes standards for reporting and displaying of
comprehensive income and its components.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement
does not require new fair value measurements, but is applied to the extent other
accounting pronouncements require or permit fair value measurements. The
statement emphasizes fair value as a market-based measurement which should be
determined based on assumptions market participants would use in pricing an
asset or a liability. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement
157,” (“FSP 157-2”) which deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for
all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities except for those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently
evaluating what impact, if any, FSP 157-2 will have on our financial
statements.
9
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No.
115” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective
is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to
mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting
provisions. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. We adopted SFAS 159 effective January 1, 2008 and elected not to measure
any of our current eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value. We do
have the option to elect to measure eligible financial assets or liabilities
acquired in the future at fair value.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations,”
(“SFAS No. 141(R)”) which replaces SFAS No.
141, “Business Combinations,”
which, among other things, establishes principles and requirements for
how an acquiring entity recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed (including intangibles)
and any noncontrolling interests in the acquired entity. SFAS No. 141(R) applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating what impact, if any, our adoption
of SFAS No. 141(R) will have on our financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No.
160”). SFAS No.
160 amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. It also amends certain of ARB 51’s consolidation procedures for
consistency with the requirements of SFAS No. 141(R). SFAS No. 160 is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating what impact, if any, our
adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have on our financial statements.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 changes the disclosure requirements
for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to
provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating what impact, if any, our adoption
of SFAS No. 161 will have on our financial statements.
In
June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities”
(“FSP No. 03-6-1”). FSP No. 03-6-1 affects entities which accrue non-returnable
cash dividends on share-based payment awards during the awards’ service period.
The FASB concluded unvested share-based payment awards which are entitled to
cash dividends, whether paid or unpaid, are participating securities any time
the common shareholders receive dividends. Because the awards are considered
participating securities, the issuing entity is required to apply the two-class
method of computing basic and diluted earnings per share. FSP No. 03-6-1 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and early adoption
is not permitted. We are currently evaluating what impact, if any, our adoption
of FSP No. 03-6-1 will have on our financial statements.
3.
Derivatives and Hedging
On
September 28, 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction which we
have designated as a cash flow hedge. The effective date of the swap transaction
is October 1, 2007, has a total notional amount of $70 million, and fixes the
swap rate at 4.77% plus the LIBOR margin (see note 7 of the condensed
consolidated financial statements) through October 1, 2008. The purpose of this
swap is to mitigate the risk of future fluctuations in interest rates on our
variable rate debt. We have determined that this swap is highly effective in
offsetting future variable interest cash flows on variable rate debt. This
interest rate swap matured on October 1, 2008 and was not renewed by
us.
10
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
As
of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the balance in accumulated other
comprehensive loss relating to derivatives was $0.1 million and $0.2 million,
respectively. The balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss is expected to
be fully amortized to interest expense by October 1, 2008.
The
Company elected to implement SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
with the one-year deferral permitted by FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157” (“FSP No. 157-2”). FSP No. 157-2, which was issued February
2008, defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year for certain
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value, except
those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements
on a recurring basis.
SFAS
No. 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair
value measurements. The valuation hierarchy categorizes assets and liabilities
measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the
observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. The three levels are
defined as follows:
●
|
Level
1 – Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets at the
measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or
liabilities.
|
|
●
|
Level
2 – Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly such as quoted
prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable,
either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the
asset or liability.
|
|
●
|
Level
3 – Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data and
which the Company makes its own assumptions about how market participants
would price the assets and
liabilities.
|
All
of our derivative instruments which fall under the fair value requirements fall
under the level 2 criteria. Interest rate swaps are valued by a third-party
consultant using modeling techniques that include market inputs such as interest
rate yield curves.
4.
Real Estate
At
September 30, 2008, we owned 35 commercial properties in the Houston, Dallas,
San Antonio, and Phoenix areas comprising approximately 2,991,000 square feet of
total area.
11
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
5. Accrued Rent and Accounts Receivable, net |
Accrued
rent and accounts receivable, net, consists of amounts accrued, billed and due
from tenants, amounts due from insurance claims, allowance for doubtful accounts
and other receivables as follows (in thousands):
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||||||
Tenant
receivables
|
$ | 1,973 | $ | 2,186 | ||||
Accrued
rent
|
3,551 | 3,196 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(1,203 | ) | (865 | ) | ||||
Insurance
claim receivables
|
— | 550 | ||||||
Other
receivables
|
57 | 319 | ||||||
Totals
|
$ | 4,378 | $ | 5,386 |
6. Unamortized Leasing Commissions and Loan Costs |
Costs
which have been deferred consist of the following (in thousands):
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||||||
Leasing
commissions
|
$ | 4,764 | $ | 4,512 | ||||
Deferred
financing costs
|
3,261 | 2,096 | ||||||
8,025 | 6,608 | |||||||
Less:
accumulated amortization
|
(4,927 | ) | (3,769 | ) | ||||
Totals
|
$ | 3,098 | $ | 2,839 |
12
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
7. Debt |
Mortgages
and other notes payable consist of the following (in thousands):
Description
|
September
30, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
||||||
Revolving
credit facility
|
||||||||
$75.0
million LIBOR +2.63%, due 2008
|
$ | 61,026 | $ | 73,525 | ||||
Fixed
rate notes
|
||||||||
$0.5
million 5.05% Notes, due 2009
|
193 | 37 | ||||||
$10.0
million 6.04% Note, due 2014
|
9,814 | 9,899 | ||||||
$11.2
million 6.52% Note, due 2015
|
11,200 | — | ||||||
Floating
rate notes
|
||||||||
$6.4
million LIBOR + 2.00% Note, due 2009
|
6,400 | — | ||||||
$ | 88,633 | $ | 83,461 |
Revolving
Credit Facility. We had a $75 million revolving credit facility with a
consortium of banks which was originally scheduled to mature on October 1, 2008
(the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The interest rate is based on the one month
LIBOR plus 262.5 basis points. The Revolving Credit Facility is secured by a
pledge of the partnership interests in Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership
III, L.P. (“WROP III”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership
that was formed to hold title to the properties comprising the borrowing base
pool for the facility. At September 30, 2008, WROP III owned 33 properties. As
of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the balance outstanding under the
Revolving Credit Facility was $61.0 million and $73.5 million, respectively, and
the availability to draw was $14.0 million and $1.5 million,
respectively.
Fixed
Rate Notes. On August 5, 2008, we, operating through our subsidiary,
Whitestone Corporate Park West, LLC (“Whitestone Corporate”) executed a
promissory note for $11.2 million payable to MidFirst Bank with an applicable
interest rate of 6.52% per annum and a maturity date of September 15, 2015 (the
“MidFirst Bank Loan”). A payment of $70,939 is due October 1, 2008 and on the
first day of each calendar month thereafter through August 1, 2015. The MidFirst
Bank Loan is a non-recourse loan secured by Whitestone Corporate’s Corporate
Park West property, which is located in Houston, Texas, and a limited guarantee
by us. Proceeds from the MidFirst Bank Loan were used to pay down a portion of
amounts due under our revolving credit facility.
Refinancing
Update. On October 1, 2008, we extended the revolving credit facility
through December 1, 2008. Under the terms of the extension, the $75 million
commitment level is reduced by proceeds received after September 30, 2008, from
refinancing or sales of collateralized properties.
During
October 2008, we entered into term loans totaling $72.7 million which were used
to pay down the outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility. The term
loans are part of an effort to refinance the revolving credit facility with
non-recourse loans on specific properties or groups of properties and to obtain
a smaller revolving credit facility secured by unencumbered properties. For a
more complete discussion of the loans, see note 14 of the condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Our
loans are subject to customary financial covenants. As of September 30, 2008 we
are in compliance with all loan covenants.
13
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
Annual
maturities of notes payable as of September 30, 2008, including the revolving
credit facility, are due during the following years (in thousands):
Year
|
|||||
2008
|
$
|
61,282
|
|||
2009
|
6,662
|
||||
2010
|
279
|
||||
2011
|
297
|
||||
2012
|
316
|
||||
2013
and thereafter
|
19,797
|
||||
Total
|
$
|
88,633
|
8. Earnings Per Share |
Basic
earnings per share is computed using net income (loss) available to common
shareholders and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted earnings per share reflects common shares issuable from the assumed
conversion of OP Units. Only those items that have a dilutive impact on basic
earnings per share are included in the diluted earnings per share. Accordingly,
excluded from the earnings per share calculation for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 are 4,739,886 and 5,333,470 OP Units, respectively, as
their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Excluded from both the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007 calculation are 5,808,337 OP Units, as their
inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
9. Income Taxes |
Federal
income taxes are not provided because we intend to and believe we qualify as a
REIT under the provisions of the Code. Our shareholders include their
proportionate taxable income in their individual tax returns. As a REIT, we must
distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our shareholders and
meet certain income sources and investment restriction requirements. In
addition, REITs are subject to a number of organizational and operational
requirements. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be
subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax)
on our taxable income at regular corporate tax rates.
Taxable
income differs from net income for financial reporting purposes principally due
to differences in the timing of recognition of interest, real estate taxes,
depreciation and rental revenue.
In
May 2006, the State of Texas adopted the Texas Margin Tax effective with
franchise tax reports filed on or after January 1, 2008. The Texas Margin Tax is
computed by applying the applicable tax rate (1% for us) to the profit margin,
which, generally, will be determined for us as total revenue less a 30% standard
deduction. Although House Bill 3 states that the Texas Margin Tax is not an
income tax, SFAS No. 109, applies to the Texas Margin Tax. We have recorded a
margin tax provision of $0.05 million and $0.17 million for the Texas Margin Tax
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Additionally, we recorded income tax expense of $0.06 and $0.16 million for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
14
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
10. Shareholders’ Equity |
Dividends
and distributions. The following tables summarize the cash
dividends/distributions paid to holders of common shares and holders of OP Units
for the four quarters of 2007 and the three quarters of 2008.
Whitestone
Shareholders
|
|||||||||
Dividend
per
Common Share
|
Quarter
Dividend
Paid
|
Total
Amount
Paid
(in thousands)
|
|||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
03/31/07
|
$
|
1,500
|
||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
06/30/07
|
1,500
|
|||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
09/30/07
|
1,500
|
|||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
12/31/07
|
1,500
|
|||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
03/31/08
|
1,500
|
|||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
06/30/08
|
1,529
|
|||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
09/30/08
|
1,456
|
OP
Unit Holders Including Minority Unit Holders
|
|||||||||
Distribution
per
OP Unit
|
Quarter
Distribution
Paid
|
Total
Amount
Paid
(in thousands)
|
|||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
03/31/07
|
$
|
2,317
|
||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
06/30/07
|
2,317
|
|||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
09/30/07
|
2,317
|
|||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
12/31/07
|
2,317
|
|||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
03/31/08
|
2,317
|
|||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
06/30/08
|
2,423
|
|||||||
0.1500
|
Qtr
ended
09/30/08
|
2,113
|
15
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
11. Commitments and Contingencies |
We
are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary
course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance. While the
resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management
believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Hurricane
Ike. Whitestone’s high concentration of 31 properties in Houston had
minor to moderate harm, ranging from broken signage and uprooted landscaping;
others had more significant issues, such as damaged roofing and exterior siding.
We maintain casualty and business interruption insurance at levels that we
believe are adequate. The detailed analysis of the total cost of Hurricane Ike,
after the insurance deductible, to be borne by us is still being
conducted.
12. Property Dispositions |
On
May 30, 2008, as part of our settlement of litigation with Hartman Management
L.P. and Allen R. Hartman (“Hartman”), we exchanged two retail properties,
Garden Oaks, a 95,046 square foot retail property located in Houston, Texas and
Northeast Square, a 40,525 square foot retail property located in Houston, Texas
for $11.4 million. The $11.4 million purchase price was paid by Hartman in the
form of 293,961.54 Whitestone common shares and 1,068,451.271 units of ownership
interest in Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership, L.P.
A
non-cash gain of $3.6 million was generated from this exchange and is reflected
in our condensed consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. As a result of the settlement, our ownership interest in the
Operating Partnership increased from 62.4% to 66.4% as of June 30, 2008. The
operating results from these two properties and the gain from the sale are
reflected as discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated financial
statements. In conjunction with the provisions of SFAS 141, the reacquisition of
the minority interests has been accounted for as a step-acquisition. As such,
all amounts attributable to the reacquisition have been allocated to real estate
assets, resulting in a $4.2 million increase to their carrying value on the
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The
following is a summary of income (loss) from discontinued operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
Three
Months ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||
Property
revenues
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
422
|
$
|
559
|
$
|
1,230
|
|||||
Property
expenses
|
—
|
226
|
307
|
530
|
|||||||||
Net
operating income (loss)
|
—
|
196
|
252
|
700
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative
|
—
|
—
|
221
|
—
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
—
|
78
|
219
|
230
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
118
|
$
|
(188
|
)
|
$
|
470
|
13. Segment Information |
Our
management historically has not differentiated results of operations by property
type nor location and therefore does not present segment
information.
14. Subsequent Events |
$26.9
Million Floating Rate Note, Due 2013. On October 3, 2008, we, operating
through our subsidiary, Whitestone Industrial-Office LLC, (Whitestone Industrial
Office), executed a floating rate promissory note (the “Jackson Life Loan”) for
$26.9 million payable to Jackson National Life Insurance Company ( “Jackson
Life”) with a floating interest rate of 260 basis points over the one month
LIBOR (the “Index”). The floating interest rate will be adjusted monthly by
Jackson Life based on the Index as published on the last business day of the
month. The initial floating interest rate is 6.53% per annum, and the Jackson
Life Loan has a maturity date of November 1, 2013.
16
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
Payments
commence on December 1, 2008 and are due on the first day of each calendar month
thereafter through November 1, 2013. Monthly payments consist of principal and
interest based on a 25 year amortization schedule, which is adjusted monthly
based on the Index. The first monthly payment due is $182,135.
The
Jackson Life Loan is a non-recourse loan secured by seven Whitestone Industrial
Office properties and a limited guarantee by us.
In
conjunction with the Jackson Life Loan, a Security Agreement and Assignment of
Leases and Rents and Fixture Filing was executed by Whitestone Industrial
Office, which contains customary terms and conditions, including
representations, warranties and covenants by Whitestone Industrial Office that
includes, without limitation, warranty of title, insurance requirements and
maintenance, use and management of the property.
The
Jackson Life Loan contains events of default that include, among other things,
non-payment and default under the Security Agreement and Assignment of Leases
and Rents and Fixture filing. Upon occurrence of an event of default, Jackson
Life is entitled to accelerate all obligations of Whitestone Industrial Office.
Jackson Life will also be entitled to receive the entire unpaid principal
balance at a default rate.
The
Jackson Life Loan proceeds were used to pay down the remaining balance on our
revolving credit facility and the remainder is available to fund potential
acquisitions and capital improvements to existing properties.
$21.4
Million 6.53% Fixed Rate Notes, Due 2013. On October 1, 2008, we,
operating through our subsidiary, Whitestone Centers LLC, executed five
promissory notes (the “Sun Life Promissory Notes”) totaling $21.35 million
payable to Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada with an applicable interest rate
of 6.53% per annum and a maturity date of October 1, 2013. Payments totaling
$159,557 are due November 1, 2008 and are due on the first day of each calendar
month thereafter through October 1, 2013.
The
Sun Life Promissory Notes are non-recourse loans secured by five Whitestone
Centers LLC’s properties, and a limited guarantee by us.
In
conjunction with the Sun Life Promissory Notes, Deeds of Trust and Security
Agreements (the “Sun Life Security Instrument”) and Assignments of Leases and
Rents were executed by Whitestone Centers LLC which contain customary terms and
conditions; including representations, warranties and covenants by Whitestone
Centers LLC, including, without limitation, warranty of title, insurance
requirements, maintenance, use and management of property.
The
Sun Life Promissory Notes contain events of default that include, among other
things, non-payment and default under the Sun Life Security Instrument. Upon
occurrence of an event of default, Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada is
entitled to accelerate all obligations of Whitestone Centers LLC. Sun Life
Insurance Company of Canada will also be entitled to receive the entire unpaid
principal balance and unpaid interest at a default rate.
The
Sun Life Promissory Notes proceeds were used to pay down a portion of the
outstanding amounts on our revolving credit facility.
17
WHITESTONE
REIT AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2008
$24.5
Million 6.56% Fixed Rate Note, Due 2013. On October 1, 2008, we,
operating through our subsidiary, Whitestone Offices LLC, executed a promissory
note (the “Nationwide Promissory Note”) for $24.5 million payable to Nationwide
Life Insurance Company with an applicable interest rate of 6.56% per annum and a
maturity date of October 1, 2013. A payment of $133,933 is due on November 1,
2008 and continuing on the first day of each calendar month thereafter through
October 1, 2009. A payment of $166,345 is due on November 1, 2009 and continuing
on the first day of each calendar month thereafter through October 1,
2013.
The
Nationwide Promissory Note is a non-recourse loan secured by three Whitestone
Offices LLC’s properties, and a limited guarantee by us.
In
conjunction with the Nationwide Promissory Note, a Deed of Trust and Security
Agreement (the “Nationwide Security Agreement”) and Assignment of Leases, Rent
and Profits were executed by Whitestone Offices LLC which contain customary
terms and conditions; including representations, warranties and covenants by
Whitestone Offices LLC, including, without limitation, warranty of title,
insurance requirements, maintenance, use and management of
property.
The
Nationwide Promissory Note contains events of default that include, among other
things, non-payment and default under the Nationwide Security Agreement or
Assignment of Leases, Rents and Profits. Upon occurrence of an event of default,
Nationwide Life Insurance Company is entitled to accelerate all obligations of
Whitestone Offices LLC. Nationwide Life Insurance Company will also be entitled
to receive the entire unpaid principal balance and accrued interest at a default
rate.
The
Nationwide Promissory Note proceeds were used to pay down a portion of the
outstanding amounts on our Revolving Credit Facility.
Revolving
Credit Facility Agreement Extension. On October 1, 2008, we, operating
through our subsidiaries, Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership, LP and WROP
III, executed an extension (the “Extension Letter”) on our $75.0 million
Revolving Credit Facility dated as of March 11, 2005 payable to KeyBank National
Association (together with other participating lenders). The maturity date of
the Revolving Credit Facility was extended to December 1, 2008.
Under
the terms of the Extension Letter, proceeds received after September 30, 2008,
from refinancing or sales of collateralized properties permanently reduce the
$75.0 million commitment level.
The
$75.0 million Revolving Credit Facility was reduced by net proceeds received of
$61.0 million from the loans discussed above, leaving $14.0 million available to
us under the Revolving Credit Facility.
18
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
You
should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of
operations in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto
included in this report. For more detailed information regarding the basis of
presentation for the following information, you should read the notes to the
condensed consolidated financial statements included in this
report.
This
quarterly report contains forward-looking statements, including discussion and
analysis of our financial condition, anticipated capital expenditures required
to complete projects, amounts of anticipated cash distributions to our
shareholders in the future and other matters. These forward-looking statements
are not historical facts but are the intent, belief or current expectations of
our management based on its knowledge and understanding of our business and
industry. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of
terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “potential,” “predicts,” “anticipates,”
“expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates” or the negative
of such terms and variations of these words and similar expressions. These
statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks,
uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are
difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from
those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking
statements that were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect
or false. You are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements, which reflect our management’s view only as of the date of this Form
10-Q. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements
to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or
changes to future operating results. Factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from any forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q
include:
●
|
the
imposition of federal taxes if we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable
year or foregone opportunity to ensure REIT status;
|
|
●
|
changes
in general economic conditions;
|
|
●
|
changes
in real estate conditions;
|
|
●
|
construction
costs that may exceed estimates or construction delays;
|
|
●
|
increases
in interest rates;
|
|
●
|
availability
of credit or significant disruption in the credit
markets;
|
|
●
|
litigation
risks;
|
|
●
|
lease-up
risks;
|
|
●
|
inability
to obtain new tenants upon the expiration of existing
leases;
|
|
●
|
inability
to generate sufficient cash flows due to market conditions, competition,
uninsured losses, changes in tax or other applicable laws;
and
|
|
●
|
the
potential need to fund tenant improvements or other capital expenditures
out of operating cash flow.
|
19
The
forward-looking statements should be read in light of these factors and the
factors identified in the “Risk Factors” sections of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as previously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
Executive
Overview
We
are a self-administered real estate investment trust or (REIT) engaged in owning
and operating income-producing real properties. Our investments include retail,
office and warehouse properties located in the Houston, Dallas, San Antonio and
Phoenix metropolitan areas. Whitestone serves as the general partner of
Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership” or
“WROP” or “OP”), which was formed on December 31, 1998 as a Delaware limited
partnership. Whitestone currently conducts substantially all of its operations
and activities through the Operating Partnership. As the general partner of the
Operating Partnership, Whitestone has the exclusive power to manage and conduct
the business of the Operating Partnership, subject to certain customary
exceptions. As of September 30, 2008, we owned and operated 35 commercial
properties consisting of:
●
|
Seventeen
retail properties containing approximately 1.2 million square feet of
leasable space and having a total carrying amount (net of accumulated
depreciation) of $61.3 million.
|
|
●
|
Seven
office properties containing approximately 0.6 million square feet of
leasable space and having a total carrying amount (net of accumulated
depreciation) of $46.8 million.
|
|
●
|
Eleven
office/warehouse properties containing approximately 1.2 million square
feet of leasable space and having a total carrying amount (net of
accumulated depreciation) of $43.0
million.
|
Our
primary source of income and cash is rents associated with commercial leases.
Our business objective is to increase shareholder value by employing a
value-added investment strategy. This strategy is focused on owning and
renovating commercial real estate assets in markets with positive demographic
trends, achieving diversification by property type and location, and acquiring
properties within our targeted returns.
As
of September 30, 2008, we had 669 total tenants. We have a diversified tenant
base with our largest tenant comprising only 1.8% of our total revenues for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. Lease terms for our properties
range from less than one year for smaller tenants to over 15 years for larger
tenants. Our leases generally include minimum monthly lease payments and tenant
reimbursements for payment of taxes, insurance and maintenance.
We
are a self-managed REIT, employing 49 full-time employees as of September 30,
2008. As a self-managed REIT, we bear our own expenses of operations, including
the salaries, benefits and other compensation of our employees, office expenses,
legal, accounting and investor relations expenses and other
overhead.
We
believe that one of the key measures of our performance is property occupancy.
Occupancy for the total portfolio was 86% at September 30, 2008, compared to 85%
at September 30, 2007. We completed 163 new and renewal leases during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 totaling 0.6 million square feet and $19.1
million in total lease value.
20
In
the fourth quarter of 2006, our Board approved our five year business plan. The
key elements of the plan are as follows:
●
|
Maximize
value in current properties through operational focus and
redevelopment
|
|
●
|
Grow
through strategic acquisitions of commercial properties in high potential
markets, including properties outside of Texas
|
|
●
|
Dispose
of non-core properties and reinvest the capital in redevelopment of
existing properties or acquisition of core properties in high potential
markets
|
|
●
|
Pare
down from three current product lines (retail, office and warehouse) and
focus on one or possibly two product lines
|
|
●
|
Raise
capital using a combination of the private and public equity and debt
markets, as well as joint ventures
|
|
●
|
Bring
liquidity to our stock by listing on a national stock
exchange
|
A
summary of our progress on the execution of this five year plan is described in
the following sections on redevelopment, acquisitions and
dispositions.
Redevelopment
We
began redevelopment in late 2007 to add 5,000 square feet of office space and
upgrade the Westchase Plaza Retail and Office Center located in Houston, Texas.
The total redevelopment was originally scheduled to be completed by September
30, 2008 at a cost of approximately $1.7 million. The redevelopment including
the office space is now scheduled to be completed in the fourth quarter of
2008.
Acquisitions
In
October 2007, we acquired a 33,400 square foot commercial property in Carefree,
Arizona, which is adjacent to North Scottsdale, for approximately $8.3 million.
The property, Pima Norte, is a newly constructed one and two story class “A”
executive medical office building. We began leasing the space during the third
quarter of 2008.
Dispositions
(discontinued operations)
On
May 30, 2008, as part of our settlement of litigation with Hartman Management
L.P. and Allen R. Hartman (“Hartman”), we exchanged two retail properties,
Garden Oaks, a 95,046 square foot retail property located in Houston, Texas and
Northeast Square, a 40,525 square foot retail property located in Houston, Texas
for $11.4 million. The $11.4 million purchase price was paid by Hartman in the
form of 293,961.54 Whitestone common shares and 1,068,451.271 units of ownership
interest in Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership, L.P.
A
non-cash gain of $3.6 million was generated from this exchange and is reflected
in our condensed consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. As a result of the settlement, our ownership interest in the
Operating Partnership increased from 62.4% to 66.4% as of September 30, 2008.
The operating results from these two properties and the gain from the sale are
reflected as discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated financial
statements. In conjunction with the provisions of SFAS 141, the reacquisition of
the minority interests has been accounted for as a step-acquisition. As such,
all amounts attributable to the reacquisition have been allocated to real estate
assets, resulting in a $4.2 million increase to their carrying value on the
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
21
Critical Accounting
Policies
In
preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements, we have made
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses
during the reported periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates. A
summary of our critical accounting policies is included in our Form 10-K as
amended, for the year ended December 31, 2007, under Item 7 in Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There have been no
significant changes to these policies during the first nine months of 2008. For
disclosure regarding recent accounting pronouncements and the anticipated impact
they will have on our operations, please refer to note 2 of the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of the Three Month Periods Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
The
following tables provide a general comparison of our results of operations for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
September
30, 2008
|
September
30, 2007
|
|||||||
Number
of properties owned and operated
|
35 | 36 | ||||||
Aggregate
gross leasable area (sq. ft.)
|
2,990,892 | 3,093,063 | ||||||
Ending
occupancy rate
|
86 | % | 85 | % | ||||
|
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||
Total
property revenues
|
$ | 7,643 | $ | 7,382 | ||||
Total
property expenses
|
3,348 | 3,107 | ||||||
Other
expense, net
|
4,468 | 4,177 | ||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
(173 | ) | 98 | |||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
— | 74 | ||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (173 | ) | $ | 172 | |||
Funds
from operations (1)
|
$ | 1,214 | $ | 1,657 | ||||
Dividends
paid on common shares and OP Units
|
2,167 | 2,371 | ||||||
Per
common share and OP unit
|
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Dividends
paid as a % of FFO
|
179 | % | 143 | % |
(1) For a
reconciliation of funds from operations to net income, see “Funds From
Operations” below.
Property
revenues. Substantially all of our revenue is derived from rents received
for the use of our properties.
We had rental income and tenant reimbursements of approximately $7.6
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to $7.4
million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of $0.2
million or 3%. The increase is primarily attributable to (1) an increase in our
occupancy rate to 86% as of September 30, 2008 as compared to 85% as of
September 30, 2007 and (2) an increase in our annualized rent per occupied
square foot to $12.06 for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared
to $11.44 for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
22
Property expenses. Our total property
expenses were $3.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as
compared to $3.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, an
increase of $0.2 million, or 6%. The primary components of operating expense are
detailed in the table below (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Real
estate taxes
|
$ | 952 | $ | 913 | ||||
Utilities
|
696 | 620 | ||||||
Contract
services
|
501 | 470 | ||||||
Repairs
and maintenance
|
525 | 523 | ||||||
Labor
and other
|
674 | 581 | ||||||
Total
property expenses
|
$ | 3,348 | $ | 3,107 |
The
increase in labor and other is primarily attributable to bad debt expense, which
increased approximately $0.1 million.
Other
expense, net. Our other expenses were $4.5 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008, as compared to $4.2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007, an increase of $0.3 million or 7%. The primary components of
other expense, net are detailed in the table below (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
General
and administrative
|
$ | 1,100 | $ | 1,414 | ||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,912 | 1,544 | ||||||
Interest
expense
|
1,508 | 1,375 | ||||||
Interest
income
|
(30 | ) | (157 | ) | ||||
4,490 | 4,176 | |||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
53 | 46 | ||||||
(Gain)
loss on sale or disposal of assets
|
37 | (148 | ) | |||||
Change
in fair value of derivative instrument
|
— | 44 | ||||||
Income
(loss) allocated to minority interests
|
(112 | ) | 59 | |||||
Total
other expenses, net
|
$ | 4,468 | $ | 4,177 |
General
and administrative. The decrease of $0.3 million in general and
administrative expense is primarily due to decreased legal fees as a result of
the settlement of the litigation with Mr. Hartman and Hartman Management, L.P.
in May 2005.
Depreciation
and amortization. The increase of $0.4 million is due to the amortization
of loan fees as a result of the extension of the revolving credit facility in
March 2008. The additional fees paid for the extension of the credit facility
are fully amortized as of September 30, 2008.
Interest
income. The decrease in interest income is a result of the decrease in
the cash balance of approximately $5.6 million and a decrease in interest
rates.
Change
in fair value of derivative instrument. In 2007, we had an interest
rate swap which was not designated as a cash flow hedge, and as such the change
in mark-to-market value of $0.04 million is included in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the three
months ended September 30, 2007.
23
Income
(loss) allocated to minority interests. The decrease in income allocated
to minority partners is the result of decreased income before minority
interests.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of the Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
The
following tables provide a general comparison of our results of operations for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
September
30, 2008
|
September
30, 2007
|
|||||||
Number
of properties owned and operated
|
35 | 36 | ||||||
Aggregate
gross leasable area (sq. ft.)
|
||||||||
2,990,892 | 3,093,063 | |||||||
Ending
occupancy rate
|
86 | % | 85 | % |
|
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||
Total
property revenues
|
$ | 23,149 | $ | 21,688 | ||||
Total
property expenses
|
9,592 | 8,781 | ||||||
Other
expense, net
|
14,450 | 13,034 | ||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(893 | ) | (127 | ) | ||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
2,183 | 294 | ||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 1,290 | $ | 167 | ||||
Funds
from operations (1)
|
$ | 2,947 | $ | 4,720 | ||||
Dividends
paid on common shares and OP Units
|
6,841 | 7,113 | ||||||
Per
common share and OP unit
|
$ | 0.45 | $ | 0.45 | ||||
Dividends
paid as a % of FFO
|
232 | % | 151 | % |
(1) For a
reconciliation of funds from operations to net income, see “Funds From
Operations” below.
Property
revenues. Substantially all of our
revenue is derived from rents received for the use of our properties. We had rental income and
tenant reimbursements of approximately $23.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to $21.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, an increase of $1.4 million or 6%. The increase is primarily
attributable to: (1) an increase in our occupancy rate to 86% as of September
30, 2008 as compared to 85% as of September 30, 2007, and (2) an increase in our
annualized rent per occupied square foot to $11.91 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 as compared to $11.26 for the nine months ended September 30,
2007.
24
Property expenses. Our total property
expenses were $9.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as
compared to $8.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an
increase of $0.8 million, or 9%. The primary components of operating expense are
detailed in the table below (in thousands):
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Real
estate taxes
|
$ | 2,885 | $ | 2,629 | ||||
Utilities
|
2,053 | 1,757 | ||||||
Contract
services
|
1,562 | 1,403 | ||||||
Repairs
and maintenance
|
1,497 | 1,336 | ||||||
Labor
and other
|
1,595 | 1,656 | ||||||
Total
property expenses
|
$ | 9,592 | $ | 8,781 |
The
increase in real estate taxes is primarily the result of increases in the value
of our properties by the governmental appraisal districts that determine the
property tax amounts.
The
increase in utilities is primarily the result of increased air conditioning
costs in our office buildings due to higher temperatures in 2008 than
2007.
The
increase in contract services is the result of increased janitorial and parking
lot maintenance cost.
Other
expense, net. Our other expenses were $14.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, as compared to $13.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, an increase of $1.4 million or 11%. The primary components
of other expense, net are detailed in the table below (in
thousands):
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
General
and administrative
|
$ | 5,233 | $ | 4,898 | ||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
5,259 | 4,621 | ||||||
Interest
expense
|
4,335 | 4,007 | ||||||
Interest
income
|
(154 | ) | (449 | ) | ||||
14,673 | 13,077 | |||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
163 | 152 | ||||||
(Gain)
loss on sale or disposal of assets
|
137 | (148 | ) | |||||
Change
in fair value of derivative instrument
|
— | 29 | ||||||
Income
allocated to minority interests
|
(523 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||
Total
other expenses, net
|
$ | 14,450 | $ | 13,034 |
General
and administrative. The increase of $0.3 million in general and
administrative expense is primarily due to increases in labor
expense.
Depreciation
and amortization. The increase of $0.6 million in depreciation and
amortization is due to the amortization of loan fees as a result of the
extension of the revolving credit facility in March 2008. The additional fees
paid for the extension of the credit facility are fully amortized as of
September 30, 2008.
Interest income. The decrease
in interest income is a result of the decrease in the cash balance of
approximately $5.6 million and a decrease in interest rates.
(Gain) loss on sale or disposal of
assets. The gain in 2007 was the result of the sale of a 2.4 acre
parcel of vacant land next to our South Shaver retail property located in
Houston, Tx. The loss in 2008 is the result of asset write-offs resulting from
early lease terminations.
Change
in fair value of derivative instrument. In 2007, we had an interest
rate swap which was not designated as a cash flow hedge, and as such the change
in mark-to-market value of $0.03 million is included in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007.
25
Income allocated to minority
interests. The increased amount allocated to minority partners is the
result of increased income before minority interest.
Income from discontinued
operations. The increase in income from discontinued operations is
primarily a result of the gain of $3.6 million from the exchange of two retail
properties in May 2008, offset by $1.3 million of the gain allocated to minority
interests.
Funds From
Operations
The
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines funds
from operations (“FFO”) as net income (loss) available to common shareholders
computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(“GAAP”), excluding gains or losses from sales of operating real estate assets
and extraordinary items, plus depreciation and amortization of operating
properties, including our share of unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and
partnerships. We calculate FFO in a manner consistent with the NAREIT
definition.
Management
uses FFO as a supplemental measure to conduct and evaluate our business because
there are certain limitations associated with using GAAP net income by itself as
the primary measure of our operating performance. Historical cost accounting for
real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of
real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values
instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, management
believes that the presentation of operating results for real estate companies
that use historical cost accounting is insufficient by itself. There can be no
assurance that FFO presented by us is comparable to similarly titled measures of
other REITs.
FFO
should not be considered as an alternative to net income or other measurements
under GAAP as an indicator of our operating performance or to cash flows from
operating, investing or financing activities as a measure of liquidity. FFO does
not reflect working capital changes, cash expenditures for capital improvements
or principal payments on indebtedness.
Below
is the calculation of FFO and the reconciliation to net income, which we believe
is the most comparable GAAP financial measure (in thousands):
Reconciliation
of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (173 | ) | $ | 172 | $ | 1,290 | $ | 167 | |||||||
Depreciation
and amortization of real estate assets (1)
|
1,462 | 1,530 | 4,414 | 4,601 | ||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of assets (1)
|
37 | (148 | ) | (3,482 | ) | (148 | ) | |||||||||
Income
(loss) allocated to minority interests(1)
|
(112 | ) | 103 | 725 | 100 | |||||||||||
FFO
|
$ | 1,214 | $ | 1,657 | $ | 2,947 | $ | 4,720 |
(1)
Including amounts for discontinued operations
26
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Overview
Our
primary liquidity demands are distributions to the holders of our common shares
and holders of units of limited partnership interest in the Operating
Partnership (“OP Units”), capital improvements and repairs and maintenance for
our properties, acquisition of additional properties, tenant improvements and
debt repayments.
Primary
sources of capital for funding our acquisitions and redevelopment programs are
our $75 million revolving credit facility, cash generated from sales of
properties that no longer meet investment criteria, cash flow generated from
operating activities and bank debt.
Our
capital structure also includes non-recourse secured debt that we assumed or
originated on certain properties. We hedge the future cash flows of certain debt
transactions principally through interest rate swaps with major financial
institutions.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our cash provided by operating
activities was $3.9 million and our total distributions were $7.0 million. As a
result, we had distributions in excess of cash flow from operations of
approximately $3.1 million. The primary reasons are: (i) $1.5 million - the
payment of legal fees related to the litigation with Mr. Hartman and Hartman
Management L.P. and (ii) $0.7 million - the payment of lease commissions upon
execution of new and renewal leases. Our primary funding for paying dividends in
excess of cash flow was cash on hand and increased debt.
In
October of 2008 the Board of Trustees reduced the quarterly dividend by 25% to
$0.1125 per share. The primary reasons for this decrease were:
●
|
Houston Property Damages From
Hurricane Ike - Whitestone’s high concentration of 31 properties in
Houston had minor to moderate harm, ranging from broken signage and
uprooted landscaping; others had more significant issues, such as damaged
roofing and exterior siding. The detailed analysis of the total cost of
Hurricane Ike, after the insurance deductible, to be borne by us is still
being conducted.
|
|
●
|
Overall Softening in the
Houston Economy - The Houston market is beginning to experience a
slowdown reflecting the national economy. For example, 99¢ Only Stores, a
Whitestone tenant in Houston, occupying two large spaces totaling about
55,000 square feet, recently announced it is closing all its Texas
stores.
|
|
●
|
Eliminate the Past Practice of
Distributing Dividends in Excess of Funds From Operations (FFO) -
Since 2005 Whitestone has distributed cash in excess of FFO, a practice
generally avoided by listed REITs. We desire to raise public equity
capital and list our shares on a national exchange, and plan to eliminate
this practice.
|
We
anticipate that cash flows from operating activities and our borrowing capacity
will provide adequate capital for our working capital requirements, anticipated
capital expenditures, litigation costs and scheduled debt payments during the
next 12 months. We also believe that cash flows from operating activities and
our borrowing capacity will allow us to make all distributions required for us
to continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT.
27
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
We
had cash and cash equivalents of $5.3 million at September 30, 2008, as compared
to $10.8 million on December 31, 2007. The decrease of $5.5 million was
primarily the result of the following:
Sources of Cash | ||
●
|
Proceeds
of $5.2 million from our credit facility and term loan on our Pima Norte
property.
|
|
●
|
Cash
provided from operations of $3.9 million.
|
|
Uses
of Cash
|
||
●
|
Payment
of dividends and distributions to common shareholders and OP Unit holders
of $7.0 million.
|
|
●
|
Payment
of loan origination costs and loan deposits of $3.5
million.
|
|
●
|
Additions
to real estate of $4.2
million.
|
We
place all cash in short-term, highly liquid investments that we believe provide
appropriate safety of principal.
Debt
Mortgages
and other notes payable consist of the following (in thousands):
Description
|
September
30, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
||||||
Revolving
credit facility
$75.0
million LIBOR + 2.63%, due 2008
|
$ | 61,026 | $ | 73,525 | ||||
Fixed
rate notes
|
||||||||
$0.5
million 5.05% Notes, due 2009
|
193 | 37 | ||||||
$10.0
million 6.04% Note, due 2014
|
9,814 | 9,899 | ||||||
$11.2
million 6.52% Note, due 2015
|
11,200 | — | ||||||
Floating
rate notes
|
||||||||
$6.4
million LIBOR + 2.00% Note, due 2009
|
6,400 | — | ||||||
$ | 88,633 | $ | 83,461 |
Revolving
Credit Facility. We had a $75 million revolving credit facility with a
consortium of banks which was originally scheduled to mature on October 1, 2008
(the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The interest rate is based on the one month
LIBOR plus 262.5 basis points. The Revolving Credit Facility is secured by
a pledge of the partnership interests in Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership
III, L.P. (“WROP III”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership
that was formed to hold title to the properties comprising the borrowing base
pool for the facility. At September 30, 2008, WROP III owned 33 properties. As
of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the balance outstanding under the
Revolving Credit Facility was $61.0 million and $73.5 million, respectively, and
the availability to draw was $14.0 million and $1.5 million,
respectively.
28
Fixed Rate Notes. On August
5, 2008, we, operating through our subsidiary, Whitestone Corporate Park West,
LLC (“Whitestone Corporate”) executed a promissory note for $11.2 million
payable to MidFirst Bank with an applicable interest rate of 6.52% per annum and
a maturity date of September 15, 2015 (the “MidFirst Bank Loan”). A payment of
$70,939 is due October 1, 2008 and on the first day of each calendar month
thereafter through August 1, 2015. The MidFirst Bank Loan is a non-recourse loan
secured by the Whitestone Corporate’s Corporate Park West property, which is
located in Houston, Texas, and a limited guarantee by us. Proceeds from the
MidFirst Bank Loan were used to pay down a portion of amounts due under our
revolving credit facility.
Refinancing Update. On
October 1, 2008, we extended the revolving credit facility through December 1,
2008. Under the terms of the extension, the $75 million commitment level is
reduced by proceeds received after September 30, 2008, from refinancing or sales
of collateralized properties.
During
October 2008, we entered into term loans totaling $72.7 million which were used
to pay down the outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility. The term
loans are part of an effort to refinance the revolving credit facility with
non-recourse loans on specific properties or groups of properties and to obtain
a smaller revolving credit facility secured by unencumbered properties. For a
more complete discussion of the loans, see note 14 of the condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Our
loans are subject to customary financial covenants. As of September 30, 2008, we
are in compliance with all loan covenants.
Annual
maturities of notes payable as of September 30, 2008, including the revolving
credit facility, are due during the following years (in thousands):
Year
|
|||||
2008
|
$
|
61,282
|
|||
2009
|
6,662
|
||||
2010
|
279
|
||||
2011
|
297
|
||||
2012
|
316
|
||||
2013
and thereafter
|
19,797
|
||||
Total
|
$
|
88,633
|
Capital
Expenditures
We
continually evaluate our properties’ performance and value. We may determine it
is best to invest capital in properties we believe have potential for increasing
value. We also may have unexpected capital expenditures or improvements for our
existing assets. Additionally, we intend to invest in similar properties outside
of Texas in cities with exceptional demographics to diversify market risk, and
we may incur significant capital expenditures or make improvements in connection
with any properties we may acquire.
29
Distributions
The
following distributions for common shares of beneficial interests in Whitestone
and units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership were paid
or declared payable during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in
thousands):
Period
|
Status
|
2008
Amount
|
Per
Share
/OP
Unit
|
2007
Amount
|
Per
Share
/OP
Unit
|
|||||||||||||
January
-March
|
Paid
|
$
|
2,371
|
$
|
0.1500
|
$
|
2,371
|
$
|
0.1500
|
|||||||||
April
- June
|
Paid
|
$
|
2,303
|
$
|
0.1500
|
$
|
2,371
|
$
|
0.1500
|
|||||||||
July
- September
|
Paid
|
$
|
2,167
|
$
|
0.1500
|
$
|
2,371
|
$
|
0.1500
|
|||||||||
October
- December
|
Payable
|
$
|
1,657
|
$
|
0.1125
|
$
|
2,371
|
$
|
0.1500
|
Taxes
We
elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”), beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 1999.
As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on income that we
distribute to our shareholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable
year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular
corporate rates. We believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner
as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, and we intend to operate so as to remain
qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
Inflation
We
anticipate that our leases will continue to be triple-net leases or otherwise
provide that tenants pay for increases in operating expenses and will contain
provisions that we believe will mitigate the effect of inflation. In addition,
many of our leases are for terms of less than five years, which allows us to
adjust rental rates to reflect inflation and other changing market conditions
when the leases expire. Consequently, increases due to inflation, as well as ad
valorem tax rate increases, generally do not have a significant adverse effect
upon our operating results.
Environmental
Matters
Our
properties are subject to environmental laws and regulations adopted by various
governmental authorities in the jurisdictions in which our operations are
conducted. From our inception, we have incurred no significant environmental
costs, accrued liabilities or expenditures to mitigate or eliminate future
environmental contamination.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We
have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007.
30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk
Market
risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and
prices. The principal market risk to which we are exposed is the risk related to
interest rate fluctuations. Based upon the nature of our operations, we are not
subject to foreign exchange or commodity risk. We will be exposed to changes in
interest rates as a result of our loans that have floating interest rates. As of
September 30, 2008, we had $67.4 million of loans with floating interest rates.
As of September 30, 2008 we had in place a $70.0 million fixed rate hedge,
leaving $2.6 million subject to interest rate fluctuations. The impact of a 1%
decrease in interest rates on our debt would result in a decrease of other
comprehensive income and minority interests of approximately $0.03. Our
involvement with derivative financial instruments is limited to managing our
exposure to changes in interest rates, and we do not expect to use them for
trading or other speculative purposes.
Item
4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The
management of Whitestone REIT, under the supervision and with the participation
of our principal executive and financial officers, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures in ensuring that the
information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms, including ensuring that such information is
accumulated and communicated to Whitestone REIT’s management as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on such evaluation,
our principal executive and financial officers have concluded that such
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2008
(the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q).
In
reaching this conclusion, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer noted Whitestone inadvertently left off management’s conclusion
regarding the effectiveness of Whitestone’s disclosure controls and procedures
for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008. The quarterly
report for the periods ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008 were subsequently
amended on November 3, 2008 (a date subsequent to the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2008). We have remedied this failure in the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures by implementing additional controls and
procedures designed to ensure that the disclosures provided by us meet the then
current requirements of the applicable filing made under the Exchange
Act.
Changes in
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During
the three months ended September 30, 2008, there were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
31
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
We
are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary
course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance. While the
resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management
believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
As
of September 30, 2008, the most significant risk factors have been set forth in
our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. The information below
updates the previously disclosed risk factors and should be read in conjunction
with the risk factors previously disclosed on our Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
The global
financial and credit crisis may have impacts on our liquidity and financial
condition that we currently cannot predict.
The
continued credit crisis and related turmoil in the global financial system may
have a material impact on our liquidity and our financial condition, and we may
ultimately face major challenges if conditions in the financial markets do not
improve. Our ability to access the capital markets or borrow money may be
restricted at a time when we would like, or need, to raise capital, which could
have an adverse impact on our flexibility to react to changing economic and
business conditions and on our ability to fund our operations and capital
expenditures in the future. The economic situation could have an impact on our
lenders or customers, causing them to fail to meet their obligations to us.
Should that occur, the amount of credit available to us may be reduced if not
replaced by a suitable lender at similar terms. While the ultimate outcome and
impact of the current financial crisis cannot be predicted, it may have a
material adverse effect on our future liquidity, results of operations and
financial condition.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item
5. Other Information
We
have scheduled our annual meeting of shareholders for Thursday, May 7, 2009. The
deadline for shareholders to submit shareholder proposals under rule 14a-8 of
the Exchange Act (“Rule 14a-8”) for inclusion in Whitestone’s proxy materials
for the 2009 annual meeting is the close of business on December 8, 2008. Such
proposals should be delivered to: Whitestone REIT; Attn: Corporate Secretary,
2600 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, Texas, 77063. Under the terms of Whitestone’s
amended and restated bylaws, for a shareholder to submit a trustee nomination or
proposal outside Rule 14a-8, such proposal or nomination must be received no
earlier than January 7, 2009 and no later than February 6, 2009 at the address
above and in the form described in Article II, Section 12 of the amended and
restated bylaws, as applicable.
32
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|||
3.1
|
Articles
of Amendment and Restatement of Declaration of Trust of Whitestone REIT
(previously filed as and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Commission File No. 000-50256,
filed on July 31, 2008)
|
|||
3.2
|
Articles
Supplementary (previously filed as and incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3(i).1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Commission
File No. 000-50256, filed on December 6, 2006)
|
|||
3.3
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws (previously filed as and incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Commission
File No. 333-111674, filed on October 9, 2008)
|
|||
4.1
|
Specimen
certificate for common shares of beneficial interest, par value $.001
(previously filed as and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No.
333-111674, filed on December 31, 2003)
|
|||
10.1
|
Promissory
Note between Whitestone Corporate Park West, LLC, and MidFirst Bank dated
August 5, 2008 (previously filed as and incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Commission
File No. 000-50256, filed on August 8, 2008)
|
|||
10.2
|
Promissory
Note between Whitestone Industrial Office LLC and Jackson Life Insurance
Company dated October 3, 2008 (previously filed as and incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
Commission File No. 000-5026, filed on October 9, 2008)
|
|||
10.3
|
Promissory
Note between Whitestone Centers LLC and Sun Life Assurance Company of
Canada dated October 1, 2008 (previously filed and incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
Commission File No. 000-50256, filed on October 7,
2008)
|
|||
10.4
|
Promissory
Note between Whitestone Centers LLC and Sun Life Assurance Company of
Canada dated October 1, 2008 (previously filed and incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
Commission File No. 000-50256, filed on October 7,
2008)
|
|||
10.5
|
Promissory
Note between Whitestone Centers LLC and Sun Life Assurance Company of
Canada dated October 1, 2008 (previously filed and incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
Commission File No. 000-50256, filed on October 7,
2008)
|
|||
10.6
|
Promissory
Note between Whitestone Centers LLC and Sun Life Assurance Company of
Canada dated October 1, 2008 (previously filed and incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
Commission File No. 000-50256, filed on October 7,
2008)
|
33
10.7
|
Promissory
Note between Whitestone Centers LLC and Sun Life Assurance Company of
Canada dated October 1, 2008 (previously filed and incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
Commission File No. 000-50256, filed on October 7,
2008)
|
|||
10.8
|
Promissory
Note between Whitestone Offices LLC and Nationwide Life Insurance Company
dated October 1, 2008 (previously filed as and incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.6, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
Commission File No. 000-50256, filed on October 7,
2008)
|
|||
10.9
|
Extension
Letter between Whitestone REIT Operating Partnership, L.P., Whitestone
REIT Operating Partnership III, L.P. and Keybank National Association
dated October 1, 2008 (previously filed and incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.7 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Commission
File No. 000-50256, filed on October 7, 2008)
|
|||
31.1*
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|||
31.2*
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|||
32.1*
|
Certificate
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|||
32.2*
|
Certificate
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
* Filed
herewith.
|
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Whitestone
REIT
|
||
Date:
November 14, 2008
|
/s/
James C. Mastandrea
|
|
James
C. Mastandrea
|
||
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
Date:
November 14, 2008
|
/s/
David K. Holeman
|
|
David
K. Holeman
|
||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
||
(Principal
Financial and Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
34