SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

|X|     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

OR

|_|     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the transition period from _________ to __________.

Commission File Number 000-23967

Registrant's phone number, including area code:         (630) 629-0003

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:   None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:   

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:    Yes    X     No        

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [X]

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes           No    X  

        State the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non–voting common equity held by non–affiliates of the registrant computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.     $5,847,239.

        As of April 11, 2005, the registrant had 27,780,949 shares of its Common Stock issued and outstanding.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Introduction

WidePoint Corporation (“WidePoint” or the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware on May 30, 1997. WidePoint is an information technology (“IT”) services firm with established competencies in federal government and commercial sector IT consulting services, including planning, managing and implementing IT solutions, software and secure authentication processes, and specialized outsourcing arrangements. WidePoint’s staff consists of business and computer specialists who help our government and civilian customers augment and expand their resident technologic skills and competencies, drive technical innovation, and help develop and maintain a competitive edge in today’s rapidly changing technological environment in business.

From 2000 through 2002, WidePoint undertook several initiatives in an effort to transition from a millennium solutions provider to an integrated IT services company. In addition to establishing its corporate identity and brand imagery and optimizing its organizational structure, management implemented a services strategy that was responsive to the evolving requirements of its customers and target markets.

During 2002 and 2003, WidePoint witnessed a highly competitive economic environment within the commercial IT sector due to a combination of constrained business investment and an excessive supply of IT consultants. As a result of these conditions, the Company experienced both reduced gross margins and decreased demand for the IT services that it provides.

In 2004, WidePoint acquired Chesapeake Government Technologies, Inc. and Operational Research Consultants, Inc. (“ORC”) as part of its strategy to refocus our business development initiatives toward the substantial increase in government spending on infrastructure and automation that has been accelerated by recent geopolitical events that have created an unprecedented need for systems and process expertise across most federal, state and local government markets. This market is also growing due to the fact that many government legacy systems and processes are approaching the end of their technologically useful lives, indicating the need for significant upgrade and enhancement. WidePoint intends to capitalize on the expected growth in its target markets through strategic acquisitions, and by implementing its project based enterprise strategy emphasizing industry-wide best practices disciplines.

Specifically, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), the Federal Privacy Act, concern over lack of critical infrastructure protection, increasing preoccupation over proprietary design information, requirements for digital information archiving, and legal and political expectations for businesses and citizens to be able to conduct business with state and federal agencies in a secure environment, have increased expectations for 24 hour a day, 7 day a week service and information availability (as well as efficiency and cost savings of providing electronic/digital forms processing). With the establishment by the U.S. Government of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the U.S. Government is focused on the requirement to ensure the integrity of sensitive or confidential information. Addressing the threats to our country’s information infrastructure, such as the spread of the Code-Red Worm (CRv2)¹ to 359,000 computer servers in less than 14 hours, has become a vital component in information assurance and security.

2

Looking forward, this secured and authenticated access market opportunity expands by orders of magnitude as information is increasingly circulated on the Internet among limited, but frequently changing audiences of specifically named individuals. Digital transactions must have the capability to prove who the provider of a piece of information is (by name, not simply office) as well as to verify that no one has modified the information subsequent to its issuance. There must be no question as to exactly when information is published. There must be a means of reviewing an auditable history of transactions and there must also be a means to archive all information securely, as well as a means to recall the information from the secure archive at a later time. The information age has created an urgent need for these requirements to be realized in an environment that is easy to use, suitable for senior executives and managers, highly reliable, and that supports the increasingly mobile demands of our society.

As federal agencies and commercial concerns are separately trying to implement meaningful and efficient security into Internet/Intranet operations to protect sensitive information and billions of dollars in transactions each day, WidePoint and its wholly-owned subsidiary ORC are postured to help these organizations meet the requirements by leveraging already existing infrastructures and creating a digital credential for each individual and device recognized and accepted both internally to an organization and externally by any other infrastructure recognizing federally authorized credentials as trustworthy. ORC’s Common Identity Enabling Infrastructure (CIEI)© and services fully support these needs.

WidePoint, through its ORC subsidiary, has solidly established its reputation as an elite provider of information assurance and security of digital transactions for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), Navy, Air Force, National Security Agency (NSA), US Coast Guard, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), General Services Administration (GSA), General Accounting Office (GAO), commercial clients and several state governments. ORC has distinguished itself by providing the highest levels of professionalism, on-time delivery of solutions and superior management.

WidePoint, through its ORC subsidiary, offers iDentity Management and eAuthentication Services© based on existing technology and open systems standards. ORC provides Identification and Authentication (I&A) interoperability among users and relying parties (Government, businesses, trading partners, and citizens) at the assurance level and rigor required by the owner of the protected resource. These services include three major US Government Certifications:

¹ David Moore (dmoore@caida.org), analysis on the spread of the Code-Red (CRv2) Worm.

3

iDentity Management and eAuthentication Services© fully support Business-to-Government, Government-to-Government, and Citizen-to-Government secure digital transaction requirements, and, because ORC-provided digital credentials are an allowable direct charge or ODC under the Federal Acquisition Regulation rules, the cost of such services and products can be “passed-on” to others by ORC’s customers in a contract and/or proposal.

WidePoint’s organization emphasizes an intense commitment to its people, its customers, and the quality of its solutions offerings. As a services organization, our customers are our primary focus. WidePoint has developed thorough, comprehensive policies, procedures and controls to mitigate the threat, or potential threat, of intentional, unintentional, physical, natural or electronic compromise or disruption of any portion of its systems or services. The talent and technology are available, and the resident expertise experienced in working together, to ensure goals are achieved quickly and seamlessly. Contract instruments are already in place, and substantive reference base with an assortment of Federal Agencies are available.

WidePoint’s ORC subsidiary anticipates capturing a market share in iDentity Management and eAuthentication Services©, which are expected to be a growing market that will have the potential of providing significant revenue growth for the Company.

Most of WidePoint’s current costs consist of salaries and benefits paid to its technical, marketing and administrative personnel, as well as the solutions required to maintain the secure facilities that support the Company’s information assurance and security offerings. As a result of its plan to expand operations through a combination of internal growth initiatives and acquisition opportunities, such costs are expected to increase. The Company’s profitability depends upon both the volume of services performed and the ability to manage costs. A significant portion of the Company’s cost structure is labor related and it must effectively manage these costs in order to achieve growth and profitability. To date, WidePoint has attempted to maximize its operating margins through efficiencies achieved by the use of its proprietary methodologies and by offsetting increases in consultant salaries with increases in consultant fees charged to its clients.

Enterprise Strategy

In the continuing effort to differentiate itself and overcome the highly competitive environment that has been an obstacle to the expansion of its revenue streams, WidePoint has modified its strategic plan, including the launch of a federal sector business initiative, continued development of new technologies and capabilities tied to wireless technologies, and initiated and expanded several alliances and relationships to enhance its ability to penetrate new market segments.

As a result of its 2003 efforts, the Company was awarded a General Services Administration (GSA) Schedule in February 2004 that enhanced its ability to market to federal government markets. In addition, the Company acquired Chesapeake Government Technologies, Inc. (“Chesapeake”) on March 24, 2004. The acquisition of Chesapeake accelerated our ability to compete for federal business as the result of Chesapeake’s existing alliances and expertise within the federal marketplace. WidePoint intends to leverage both Chesapeake’s capabilities and WidePoint’s GSA Schedule to expand its revenue base, even as it continues to look for and analyze growth alternatives via other selected merger and acquisition opportunities.

4

On October 25, 2004, we completed the acquisition of ORC. ORC specializes in providing IT solutions, including the provision of integration and secure authentication processes and related IT services to the United States Government. ORC has been at the forefront of implementing Public Key Infrastructure (“PKI”) technologies and ORC is currently the only External Certificate Authority for the United States Government. As such, ORC is authorized to issue all permissible certificate types and services in accordance with Defense Information Systems Agency and National Security Agency standards necessary for the interoperable, secure exchange of information between U.S. Governmental agencies, contractors, and international allies such as members of NATO.

WidePoint intends to leverage both ORC’s and Chesapeake’s capabilities, in concert with its pre-existing GSA Schedule, to expand its existing revenue base. In addition, the Company is actively seeking to acquire other companies with complementary technical capabilities in IT related services to the federal government (both defense and civilian), state governments and local government agencies. If successful, WidePoint anticipates that it will become a significantly larger company with broader capabilities and resources than has been the case historically.

At the heart of the Company’s enterprise strategy is the vision of a “Commonwealth” of semi-autonomous but tightly intertwined business units, focused on the provision of a broad range of IT-based solutions to a clearly defined target market. While leveraging financial and support resources, and motivated to aggressively cross-market and cross-sell, these business units would retain their entrepreneurial cultures and management teams and be accountable for the performance and growth of their own lines of business and relationships. WidePoint believes this model to be quite attractive to individuals who have built quality businesses with inherent value, but who seek assistance and support in driving their businesses to the next level of growth and maturity. Such individuals will be provided with the opportunity to participate in the growth and performance of the total Widepoint enterprise and potentially capitalize upon the enterprise valuation they have helped build over the years within their respective organizations.

Business Strategy and Services

WidePoint’s strategy for its project-based initiatives has been to apply a structured delivery methodology based on industry standard best practices, enhanced with a set of deliverable templates that boost productivity and effectiveness through the services of its consultants. The Company focuses on providing end results with significant, tangible business benefits through consultants that possess recognized industry-standard certifications and years of successful project experience. The ancillary strategy for staff augmentation services has been to provide a value added service based upon the “best to market” practices developed internally, that utilizes a rapid response capability to our clients via highly trained consultants.

The Company presently focuses on planning, implementing and supporting IT-based initiatives with the following services:

Systems Engineering and Integration

Systems engineering and integration consists of working with Government and commercial clients to develop a plan, policies and specific requirements that are tailored to their unique needs. An electronic information approach, policy and implementation plan for any customer is developed after conducting an analysis of that customer’s requirements, including:

5

Architecture and Planning Services

IT Strategic Planning

Preparing an Information Architecture (IA) plan requires analysis, evaluation, integration, administration and maintenance. We are in an era where many government and commercial entities have an increasingly urgent need to protect sensitive business and personal information from the Internet information thieves of our time. Indeed, some would argue that protecting shared information and having the opportunity to guarantee trusted digital identity verification must be assured before full communications can take place. The use of digital signatures and Public Key enablement are becoming requirements for many who do business electronically with federal, state and local government agencies, but there are many other aspects of electronic information assurance that are important for users to consider. WidePoint’s ORC subsidiary and WidePoint’s commercial operations have an established reputation for developing solutions individually tailored to a customer’s many needs, while remaining within that customer’s schedule and time constraints. WidePoint sees itself as an advisor to the user, not a sales organization for specific equipment or solutions. The Company believes that attaining required information security standards for electronic communications and computer systems need not be seen as requiring huge dollar outlays, inevitably requiring wholesale replacement of existing systems, servers, hardware, software and security tools/firewalls, etc.

Software Selection

Through its operating subsidiaries, WidePoint applies open systems technology and Commercial Off-The-Shelf (“COTS”) tools, which complement rather than replace existing systems wherever possible. Further, the Company’s preferred recommendation is to migrate as many existing systems as possible from their current capabilities to more secure, robust capabilities by augmenting those systems with COTS products. One objective is to make changes that are largely invisible to operators and managers so there is little in the way of training challenges for the customer and only modest requirements for equipment investment. WidePoint does not design unique and proprietary software that forces the customer to work through the Company when subsequent (and inevitable) upgrades are required. WidePoint’s ORC subsidiary is GSA and DoD certified in the PKI arena, mandating that it remain current with policy, technical and security requirements for IA work on behalf of customers who may communicate with the Federal Government or DoD.

6

Management

WidePoint’s strength is that it values its people, its customers, and the quality of the services it provides. As a services organization, the focus of the Company’s business is its customers. For that reason any organizational discussion starts with WidePoint’s primary customer interface.

WidePoint has developed thorough, comprehensive policies, procedures and controls to mitigate the threat, or potential threat, of compromise or disruption to any portion of the WidePoint systems as a result of intentional, unintentional, physical, natural or electronic means. These policies, procedures and controls are implemented and adhered to by those individuals fulfilling trusted roles.

The people selected to fill such trusted roles have proven to be diligent and trustworthy. The functions performed in these roles form the basis of trust for each such system. As an added precaution, WidePoint assigns the roles and functions responsible for security among a group of several individuals, so that any malicious activity requires collusion. Through sound security planning based on proven techniques and industry standards, the WidePoint systems were developed and are operated and maintained to provide digital credentials asserting the appropriate level of assurance to protect strategic and intellectual property and related information management.

The policies, procedures and controls are periodically reviewed for currency and possible upgrade. Random testing is performed and documented for use as a tool to further refine the means and methods used to maintain the integrity of each system. Widepoint executive management must authorize all actions performed by individuals fulfilling trusted roles.

Program/ Project Management

WidePoint and its subsidiaries’ Project Managers are people-oriented systems engineering professionals with leadership competence capable of determining the most effective ways to meet the customer’s requirements. Project Managers are facilitators, integrators, team builders, and relationship managers. Within its requirements-driven, performance-based, people oriented environment, Project Managers have responsibility and authority for project requirements. They are responsible for applying the systems engineering discipline to ensure that the technical, cost and schedule requirements are clearly defined and communicated and that quality products and/or services are rendered. The Project Manager is also responsible for designating resource allocation and for documenting requirements and assessing project performance. Project Managers are responsible for getting the job done correctly, on time, and on budget. This is accomplished by authorizing schedule/tasks with efficient and effective resources.

The Company’s Team Leads and Supervisors are people-oriented engineering professionals capable of determining the most effective ways to execute assignments delegated by the Project Manager. A Team Lead may be on a systems engineering or other competency/professional track. Team Leads are responsible to the Project Manager for the planning and execution of assignments, and to ensure performance parameters are met within timelines. Team Leads are responsible for identifying and mitigating risks associated with meeting requirements. If technical, schedule or resource obstacles cannot be overcome it is the responsibility of Team Leads to communicate to the Project Manager to achieve resolution.

7

Competency Leads are specialists or subject matter experts focused on areas of expertise that meet customer requirements and provide quality products and services. Development of competencies, from the apprentice through expert level, will be accomplished by matching task assignments with skill and knowledge. Competency Leads guide and recommend resource allocation to Project Managers. Competency expertise will vary depending on project requirements. Individuals with certain skills may be added or removed from projects, as required. On the job training at the Company is the key to developing expertise.

IT Outsource Solutions

Infrastructure Management

Common Identity Enabling Infrastructure (CIEI)©: On-site and out-source services that support an organization’s Business-to-Government (B2G), Business-to-Business (B2B), Citizen -to-Business (C2B), Government-to-Government (G2G), and Citizen-to-Government (C2G) enterprise requirements for:

Applications Management

Focused in the medium to high assurance level market the Company’s CIEI© allows enterprise and application owners to begin where they currently are architecturally and migrate toward a vision of a secure network identity model. The Company is poised to support these secure network identity enterprise requirements (in-house or outsourced), by providing seamless integration of four services that make up CIEI©:

8

Architecture and Design

By leveraging standards based, mature commercial-off-the-shelf components that have been proven in the technology market, CIEI© and other services offer the efficiency of a common solution for multiple applications within an enterprise and interoperability with the Federal Government and trading partners. The Company can also replicate these services (in part or whole) to provide an enterprise with the following advantages:

Software and Authentication Technology

By leveraging the Company’s systems engineering experience Widepoint is striving to become one of the nation’s premier systems engineering firms with a specialization in information assurance and security. This is evidenced by the following accomplishments:

WidePoint’s ORC subsidiary is certified by the GSA eAuthentication Program Management Office as an eAuthentication Service Provider to facilitate public access to the services offered by Government agencies through use of information technologies, including on-line access to computers for purposes of reviewing, retrieving, providing, and exchanging information. ORC offers various authentication credentials that include Userid/Password (Level 1 and 2 assurance), as well as Digital Certificates (Level 3 assurance).

9

ORC’s eAuthentication, defined by the “System Security Plan for Operational Research Consultants (ORC) Information Assurance/ Identity Management (IA/ IDM)©” supports multiple authentication methods, from Level 1 Userid/ Password to Level 3 Digital Certificates to authenticate users and validate their credentials. Real-time consumer and business authentication methods are used to extend ORC’s eAuthentication offering, allowing an organization to address broad audiences of users for eGovernment and internal applications in a timely manner. These are proven capabilities, compliant with existing laws and regulations, which can be integrated and rapidly deployed. ORC’s eAuthentication services apply a variety of proven methods that can be incorporated and validated quickly, developing confidence among your users and relying application.

ORC is certified as a trusted third party under the US Government ECA program, as defined by the “ORC External Certification Authority (ECA) Certification Practice Statement©” and the “ORC External Certification Authority (ECA) Key Recovery Practice Statement©". ORC is currently the only ECA authorized to issue Server (Device) Certificates and Code Signing Certificates, in addition to personal certificates:

ORC is a certified trusted third party under the GSA ACES program to provide digital certificates to the citizenry of the United States, as defined by the “ORC ACES Certification Practice Statement©". The ACES certificates can be provided to each and every American citizen, as well as, federal, state and local government and business entities to conduct business electronically with federal agencies such as the Veteran’s Administration, Social Security Administration and any other agency offering services via the Internet. In addition to the ACES contract, ORC is authorized as a trusted third party to sell ACES certificates directly to the business and private citizen communities. This offering is currently migrating to an ORC ACES/Shared Service Provider (SSP) capability that will expand the ACES program to offering full B2G and G2G PKI services.

The documents described above define the system and process intellectual property that allows the Company to be the leader in this market.

WidePoint’s ability to successfully expand requires significant revenue growth from increased services to existing and new clients, as well as successful strategic acquisitions and/or mergers. The realization of these events depends on many factors, including successful strategic sales and marketing efforts and the identification and acquisition of appropriate businesses. Any difficulties encountered in expansion through successful sales and marketing efforts and/or acquisitions could have an adverse impact on the Company’s revenues and operating results.

10

Clients

Widepoint’s commercial client base is located predominantly in the MidWestern region of the United States, while the government client base is located in the East Coast region of the United States. The Company has experience and expertise in the successful completion and staff augmentation of projects in the following industries: federal government agencies and associated contractor/suppliers, manufacturing, consumer product goods, direct marketing, healthcare and financial services.

Historically WidePoint has derived, and may continue to derive in the future, a significant percentage of its total revenues from a relatively small number of clients. During 2004, two customers, Abbott Laboratories and The Department of Homeland Security individually represented 12% and 11% of revenues, respectively. Due to the nature of WidePoint’s business and the relative size of certain contracts, which are entered into in the ordinary course of business, the loss of any single significant customer may have a material adverse effect on results, but the Company does not believe at this time that we are substantially dependent upon any one customer. Further, with the acquisition of ORC, we have expanded the Company’s clientele dramatically with the following additional clients:

Marketing and Sales

WidePoint focuses sales and marketing efforts on targeting federal government and corporate clients with significant IT budgets and requirements. Although work is performed for companies in various industries, the majority of the Company’s revenues for 2003 and 2004 were derived from contracts and projects with manufacturing clients, consumer products clients, healthcare clients, and financial services clients. Prospectively, the Company expects to derive a majority of its revenue from contracts with the federal government and related contracting opportunities.

11

The Company markets its solutions through its direct sales force, and alliances with several strategic partnerships in specific industries. The direct sales force is responsible for providing highly responsive, quality service and ensuring client satisfaction with services provided. Strategic partnerships and alliances provide the Company with additional access to potential clients.

Because time is of the essence (and cost is always a factor), WidePoint believes our proven CIEI© and services will scale well to the commercial market. By eliminating the lead-time needed to become operational while waiting for in-house development efforts, the Company can enable an organization to quickly deploy a fully operational capability, providing the highest levels of I&A of users and devices, securing of sensitive data, time-stamping and archiving of data, and an auditable process flow. Further, the credentials used to accomplish all of these requirements are interoperable with any other agency or organization choosing to accept Federal-compliant credentials. Moreover, because the trial and error phase has been previously facilitated, the resulting answers can be immediately gleaned, thereby mitigating overall costs dramatically.

Backlog

Through its operating subsidiaries, WidePoint maintains a significant backlog of multiple award government contracts that include:

GSA contracts that allow it to actively market specific tasking and initiatives throughout the Federal Government, including:

The Company also holds various Government OMNIBUS contracts through its ORC subsidiary, including:

Contracts are also held with specific Government agencies, including:

12

Additionally, WidePoint’s ORC subsidiary has over two-dozen iDentity Management and eAuthentication Services© pricing agreements with commercial companies for lots of 1,000, 5,000 and 10,000 credentials and associated services in various stages of agreement. The iDentity Management and eAuthentication Services© are expected to be WidePoint’s largest growth market.

WidePoint also holds several non-governmental contracts and preferred vendor relationships with major international corporations to provide IT manpower, consulting support and various outsourcing services.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s government contract awards which the Company could compete for task orders under had a backlog of approximately $575 million. Under these contract vehicles approximately $42 million was funded with approximately $20 million of that funded amount expected to occur after the current fiscal year. The Company presently is obligated to perform approximately $8 million in backlog in the current fiscal year.

Competition

The market for the services that the Company provides is highly competitive, fragmented, and is subject to rapid change. Primary competitors include participants from a variety of market segments, including publicly and privately held firms, large accounting and consulting firms, systems consulting and implementation firms, application software firms, service groups of computer equipment companies, and other general management consulting firms. Increasingly, companies with third-world and emerging markets operations bases are also targeting this market. Competition is generally based on quality, timeliness, cost of services, and relevant targeted expertise.

With relation to systems engineering in the government sector, WidePoint’s long-range concern is the element of uncertainty associated with the Federal budget and its impact upon competition among the many contractors. The Company believes that the best way to meet the challenge of this market is to maintain a low overhead, employ quality personnel, and continue to deliver a product of the highest quality. Many corporations that operate in this market have reputable corporate histories and can draw employees from an enormous pool of suitable candidates. They have the ability to absorb substantial losses from operations. Additionally, they have an established network to assimilate data and formulate strategy in today’s competitive environment. Their strength is often their mass, which gives them flexibility in both proposing and responding to new requirements. Also, while there are advantages to being small, lack of name recognition becomes a problem in major contracts, even if past performance is in the Company’s favor.

13

However, many of these same corporations have higher overhead costs. They have policies and procedures in effect that quite frequently cause a longer response time to meet customer’s needs. Management personnel within those corporations are usually far removed from their workforce, thus fostering employee dissatisfaction.

Competition within the information security market is still fragmented. The most significant competition is in the planning and analysis portion of the market, in which many of the companies referred to above also operate, such as: Booz-Allen Hamilton, SAIC, CACI/ AMS, BAE Systems, Northrop Grumman, etc. However, the market to which the Company provides its CIEI© products and services has limited competition. Most of that competition (that includes Verisign, Digital Signature Trust, BeTrusted, and GeoTrust) is focused on low to medium levels of assurance. WidePoint believes it is the only company that has satisfied all of the certification requirements to serve the more meaningful medium to high level assurance market, and further believe this constitutes a twelve to eighteen month advantage over competition.

Additionally, the Company believes that its advantage in each of the markets described above is two-fold: highly experienced personnel and relatively low overhead. WidePoint’s professional staff has a proven record of success in meeting service needs of both private industry and public sector clients. Senior staff personnel hold advanced degrees in science, engineering, and operations research, specializing in the resolution of complex operational problems. Experienced personnel, competitive overhead, and being first to market will allow the Company to be very competitive.

Intellectual Property

WidePoint’s intellectual property primarily consists of methodologies developed for use in application development solutions. The services described above define the system and process intellectual property that allows the Company to be the leader in its markets. The Company’s ORC subsidiary holds a Patent for a Digital Parsing Tool that provides a secure repository gateway that will allow users, including first time users, the ability to immediately establish and access accounts by presenting their certificates to a directory validated by the gateway. In this manner, the Company relies upon a combination of trade secrets, copyright and trademark laws, and contractual restrictions to establish and protect the ownership of its proprietary methodologies. WidePoint generally enters into nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements with its employees, partners, consultants, independent sales agents and clients. As the number of its competitors increase, the likelihood that such competitors will use similar methodologies increases. Although the Company’s methodologies have never been subject to an infringement claim, there can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against the Company in the future; that the assertion of such claims will not result in litigation; or that WidePoint would prevail in such litigation or be able to obtain the license for the use of any allegedly infringed intellectual property from a third party on commercially reasonable terms. Further, regardless of its outcome, litigation can result in substantial costs to WidePoint and divert management’s attention from its operations. Although the Company is not aware of any basis upon which a third party could assert an infringement claim, any infringement claim or litigation could materially adversely affect the business, operating results and financial condition of the Company.

14

Personnel

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had 76 full time employees and 4 part-time employees including 6 persons in sales and recruiting, 62 persons in consulting, and 8 persons in management and administration. WidePoint also periodically employs additional consultants and temporary employees.

The Company’s facilities are located in areas populated by military (both retired and active duty) and highly skilled civilian personnel. Potential employees possessing the unique qualifications required are readily available for both part-time and full-time employment. The primary method of soliciting personnel is through recruiting resources directly utilizing all known sources that include electronic databases, public forums, and personal networks of friends and former coworkers.

WidePoint believes that its future success will depend in part on its continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, technical, sales and support personnel. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to attract and retain personnel necessary for the development of its business. The Company generally does not have employment contracts with its employees, but does maintain employment agreements with its key employees. However, confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements are in place with many of the Company’s employees. None of WidePoint’s employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. The Company believes that its relations with its employees are good.

SEC Filing Status

Commencing with its quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company will file its reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a “small business issuer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Act.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

The Company’s principal executive office consists of approximately 3,500 square feet of office space located at One Lincoln Centre, Suite 1100, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, which is leased through July 2007 for approximately $3,500 per month. Rent in 2003, under a prior sublease for the office at One Lincoln Centre was approximately $66,000. Rent in 2004 was approximately $65,000.

WidePoint’s ORC subsidiary has its principal offices at 1736 South Park Court, Chesapeake, Virginia in approximately 2,400 square feet under a lease that expires on April 30, 2006. The annual rent for this office is approximately $26,400, plus a pro rata share of increases in real estate taxes and operating expenses.

ORC also maintains two secure facilities in the Northern Virginia area. The Alexandria office is located at 1625 Prince Street, Suite 350, Alexandria, Virginia. This office is currently leased through January 31, 2008 for approximately $7,400 per month. The Fairfax office is located at 11250 Waples Mill Road, South Tower, Suite 210, Fairfax, Virginia 22030. The lease for this office expires February 28, 2009 and costs approximately $28,000 per month. The Alexandria office consists of approximately 3,100 square feet of office space and the Fairfax office consists of approximately 11,900 square feet of office space. A pro rata share of increases in real estate taxes and operating expenses are also paid for these offices.

15

Access to ORC’s secure facilities is restricted to authorized personnel. All unknown or unidentified persons are accompanied or challenged by personnel to prevent unauthorized access and/or disclosure of sensitive data. Non-cleared maintenance and cleaning personnel are escorted at all times while in central computer rooms and facilities. ORC employs five levels of physical access control and two separate physical access alarm systems:

A GSA approved five-drawer security container (Mosler Safe), located at each ORC facility, provides physical protection of information related to the privileged access roles. At least two parties are necessary to do any key management or audit log operations. Separation of activation mechanism components is protected in separate safe drawers accessible only to personnel in each separate role. A security check of the facility housing the ORC IA/ IDM resources is made at least once every 24 hours.

All of ORC’s facilities maintain an interim Top Secret Facility Clearance.

During 2000, several of the Company’s offices were closed and their leases were either sublet, assigned, or have expired. The Michigan office lease located at 32000 Northwestern Highway, Suite 165, Farmington Hills, Michigan was sublet to Galaxy Builders in June 2000 on the same terms as the primary lease for that location. Annual rent in 2004 for that property was approximately $38,400 and the lease expired on February 24, 2004. The lease for the Company’s former corporate headquarters office located at 20251 Century Boulevard, Germantown, Maryland was assigned on December 1, 2000 to GHG Holdings, Inc., and such assigned lease expires on September 30, 2005. The Company remains secondarily liable if GHG Holdings, Inc. were to default on that assigned lease.

16

WidePoint believes that it can obtain additional facilities required to accommodate its projected needs without difficulty and at commercially reasonable prices, although no assurance can be given that it will be able to do so.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

As of December 31, 2004, ORC was the defendant in a lawsuit entitled Fleuette v. ORC, C.A. No. 1:04-cv-1054, in the Eastern District of Virginia, in which Renee Fleuette Gallagher, a former employee of ORC, alleged that ORC wrongfully terminated her employment with ORC. The plaintiff sought an unspecified amount of damages from ORC. Prior administrative and judicial proceedings instituted by Ms. Gallagher against ORC have been dismissed or found to be without merit. ORC did not believe that it had committed any wrong against Ms. Gallagher and therefore vigorously defended itself in the lawsuit filed by Ms. Gallagher. As part of the agreements entered into between WidePoint, ORC and the former stockholders of ORC at the time of WidePoint’s acquisition of ORC, the former stockholders of ORC agreed to indemnify WidePoint and ORC from any liability involving the claims by Ms. Gallagher against ORC, including the above-captioned lawsuit. In February of 2005, a settlement was reached between the parties and the complaints were dismissed.

Other than as described above, the Company is not involved in any material legal proceedings.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

WidePoint’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on January 27, 2005. The following matters were submitted to our stockholders at that meeting.

The following two persons were elected by the following votes to serve as Class I directors of the Board of Directors for three years or until their resignation and/or their successors are elected and qualified:

The following two persons were elected by the following votes to serve as Class III directors of the Board of Directors for two years or until their resignation and/or their successors are elected and qualified:

17

Stockholders also ratified the increase of the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 50,000,000 shares to 110,000,000 shares. Such approval was evidenced by a vote of 18,165,595 shares for and 1,343,772 shares against, with 3,900 shares abstaining.

Stockholders ratified an amendment to WidePoint’s 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) providing for an increase of 7,000,000 shares in the total number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan from 3,000,000 shares to 10,000,000 shares. The amendment was approved by a vote of 11,480,868 shares for and 2,907,522 shares against, with 5,124,877 shares abstaining.

Finally, the Stockholders ratified the selection of Grant Thornton, LLP as the independent accountants for WidePoint for the current fiscal year. Such approval was approved by a vote of 18,369,797 shares for and 1,134,170 shares against, with 9,300 shares abstaining.

18

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

The Company’s Common Stock is quoted on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “WDPT” and the Frankfurt and Berlin exchanges under the symbol “ZMX”. From July 5, 2000 to March 1, 2001 the Company’s Common Stock was traded on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market under the symbol “WDPT”.

The stock prices listed below represent the high and low closing bid prices of the Common Stock for each of the periods indicated:

        As of April 12, 2005 there were 176 registered holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock and approximately 2,016 beneficial holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

        The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2004, with respect to the Company’s compensation plans under which its Common Stock is authorized for issuance:

Dividend Policy

The Company has never paid cash dividends on its Common Stock and intends to continue this policy for the foreseeable future. WidePoint plans to retain earnings for use in growing its business base. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company and will be dependent on WidePoint’s results of operations, financial condition, contractual and legal restrictions and any other factors deemed by the management and the Board of Directors to be a priority requirement of the business.

Repurchases of Equity Securities

The Company repurchased no shares of its Common Stock during the fourth quarter of 2004.

19

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The selected financial data presented below for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2004 is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. You should read the selected financial data presented below in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, the notes to our consolidated financial statements and “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

On October 25, 2004, WidePoint acquired the stock of Operational Research Consultants, Inc. (“ORC”), a Virginia corporation. The accompanying financial data includes the accounts of ORC as of the date of the acquisition. A further description of that purchase is set forth in the Company’s Form 8-K/A filed on January 7, 2005 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. On April 30, 2004, WidePoint closed on the acquisition of Chesapeake Government Technologies, Inc. (“Chesapeake”), a Delaware corporation. A further description of that purchase is set forth in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2004. On September 29, 2000, WidePoint sold PMC. The accompanying financial data includes the accounts of PMC through that date of sale. A further description of that sale transaction is set forth in the Company’s Form 8-K/A filed on December 13, 2000 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The reflected changes as a result of the acquisitions and disposition described above along with the Company’s strategy to continue to acquire additional businesses might cause the data described in the tables below not to be indicative of the Company’s future financial condition or results of operations.

20

Selected Financial Data

21

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Forward Looking Statements

The information set forth below includes forward-looking statements. Certain factors that could cause results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements are set forth below. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

WidePoint Corporation is a consulting services firm specializing in planning, managing and implementing Information Technology (“IT”) solutions. Its staff consists of business and computer specialists who help customers augment and expand their resident technologic skills and competencies, drive technical innovation, and help develop and maintain a competitive edge in today’s rapidly changing technological environment in business.

During 2002 and 2003, WidePoint witnessed a highly competitive economic environment within the commercial IT sector due to a combination of constrained business investment and an excessive supply of IT consultants. As a result of these conditions, the Company experienced both reduced gross margins and decreased demand for the IT services that it provides.

In 2004, WidePoint acquired Chesapeake Government Technologies, Inc. (“Chesapeake”) and Operational Research Consultants, Inc. (‘ORC”) as part of WidePoint’s strategy to refocus the Company’s business development initiatives toward the substantial increase in government spending on infrastructure and automation that has been accelerated by recent geopolitical events that have created an unprecedented need for systems and process expertise across most government markets, federal, state and local. This market is also growing due to the fact that many government legacy systems and processes are approaching the end of their technologically useful lives, indicating the need for significant upgrade and enhancement. WidePoint intends to capitalize on the expected growth in its target markets through its strategic acquisitions, continuing rollout of the ORC Public Key Infrastructure (“PKI”) initiative, and by continuing to implement our project based enterprise strategy emphasizing industry-wide best practices disciplines. With the addition of the customer base and the increase in revenues attributable from the ORC acquisition, WidePoint’s opportunity to leverage and expand further into the federal marketplace has improved dramatically. ORC’s past client successes, top security clearances in their facilities and with their personnel, and additional breadth of management talent have expanded the Company’s reach into markets that previously were not accessible to WidePoint. The Company intends to continue to leverage the synergies between the newly acquired operating subsidiaries and cross sell those technical capabilities into each separate marketplace serviced by its respective subsidiaries. Further, the Company is continuing to actively search out new synergistic acquisitions that WidePoint believes will further enhance the present base of business which has been augmented by its recent acquisitions and internal growth initiatives.

22

As a result of these actions in 2004, the Company’s revenues for the period ending December 31, 2004 increased by approximately 68% from approximately $3.3 million in 2003 to $5.5 million in 2004. This increase was materially due to the additional revenues of approximately $2.2 million generated by ORC from October 25, 2004 through December 31, 2004. ORC generated approximately $10.5 million in unaudited revenues for the year ending December 31, 2004. Taken together with the results of WidePoint’s revenues for the same period, the combined total materially affects the comparability of the information reflected in the selected consolidated financial information presented above, and therefore may not be indicative of the Company’s future financial condition or results of operations. Further, as the Company attempts to continue to implement its strategy of strategic growth driven both by internal growth and potential merger and acquisition activity, we believe that future performance may continue to affect the comparability of the information reflected in the selected consolidated financial information presented above.

In addition, most of the Company’s current costs consist primarily of the salaries and benefits paid to WidePoint’s technical, marketing and administrative personnel and as a result of its plan to expand its operations through a combination of internal growth initiatives and merger and acquisition opportunities, the Company expects such costs to increase.  WidePoint’s profitability also depends upon both the volume of services performed and the Company’s ability to manage costs.  As a significant portion of the Company’s cost is labor related, WidePoint must effectively manage these costs to achieve and grow its profitability.  To date, the Company has attempted to maximize its operating margins through efficiencies achieved by the use of its proprietary methodologies, and by offsetting increases in consultant salaries with increases in consultant fees received from its clients. The uncertainties relating to the ability to achieve and maintain profitability, obtain additional funding to partially fund the Company’s growth strategy and provide the necessary investment to continue to upgrade its management reporting systems to meet the continuing demands of the present regulatory changes affect the comparability of the information reflected in the selected consolidated financial information presented above.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. WidePoint believes that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which the Company relies are reasonably based upon information available to it at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates, judgments and assumptions and actual results, the Company’s financial statements will be affected. The significant accounting policies that WidePoint believes are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:

23

In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by U.S. GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result. The Company’s senior management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with its Audit Committee. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which contain additional information regarding accounting policies and other disclosures required by U.S. GAAP.

Revenue Recognition

The majority of WidePoint’s revenues are derived from cost-plus, or time-and-materials contracts. Under cost-plus contracts, revenues are recognized as costs are incurred and include an estimate of applicable fees earned. For time-and-material contracts, revenues are computed by multiplying the number of direct labor-hours expended in the performance of the contract by the contract billing rates and adding other billable direct costs. In the event of a termination of a contract, all billed and unbilled amounts associated with those task orders where work has been performed would be billed and collected. The termination provisions of the contract would be accounted for at the time of termination. Any deferred and/or amortization cost would either be billed or expensed depending upon the termination provisions of the contract. Further, the Company has had no history of losses nor has it identified any specific risk of loss at December 31, 2004 due to termination provisions and thus has not recorded provisions for such events.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

WidePoint determines its Allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligations , and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company makes judgments as to its ability to collect outstanding receivables based on these factors and provide allowances for these receivables when collections become doubtful. Provisions are made based on specific review of all significant outstanding balances.

Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets

Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying net assets acquired. The Company has adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations,” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” These standards require the use of the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, set forth the accounting for the initial recognition of acquired intangible assets and goodwill and describe the accounting for intangible assets and goodwill subsequent to initial recognition. Under the provisions of these standards, goodwill is not subject to amortization and annual review is required for impairment. The impairment test under SFAS No. 142 is based on a two-step process involving (i) comparing the estimated fair value of the related reporting unit to its net book value and (ii) comparing the estimated implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying value. Impairment losses are recognized whenever the implied fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value. The Company’s annual impairment testing date is December 31.

24

The Company recognizes an acquired intangible apart from goodwill whenever the intangible arises from contractual or other legal rights, or when it can be separated or divided from the acquired entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, either individually or in combination with a related contract, asset or liability. Such intangibles are amortized over their useful lives. Impairment losses are recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible subject to amortization is not recoverable from expected future cash flows and its carrying amount exceeds its fair value.

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including property and equipment, identifiable intangibles, and goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. To determine recoverability of its long-lived assets, the Company evaluates the probability that future undiscounted net cash flows will be less than the carrying amount of the assets.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company is not aware of any known trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to occur and materially affect the methodology or the assumptions the Company has used to value goodwill and other long-lived assets. Goodwill and long-lived assets are a significant item on the Company’s balance sheet and represent approximately 60% of our total assets. Any impairment as a result of the estimate utilizing net cash flows to determine the assumed value of long-lived assets could have a significant impact on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations. Goodwill and other long-lived assets are identified on the face of the Balance Sheet as Goodwill and Intangibles. Amortization of Intangibles are identified on the face of the Statement of Operations within Amortization and Depreciation.

The Company’s senior management has discussed the development and selection of the accounting estimate, and the MD&A disclosure regarding it, with the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors.

Accounting for Income Taxes

WidePoint accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under the asset and liability method of SFAS No. 109, deferred income taxes are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts, and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

The Company has incurred historical net operating losses, or NOLs, for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no federal income tax provision has been recorded to date and there are no taxes payable. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.

Based upon the level of historical losses that may limit utilization of NOL carry forwards in future periods, management is unable to predict whether these net deferred tax assets will be utilized prior to expiration. The unused NOL carry forwards expire in years 2010 through 2023. As such, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets. Although WidePoint believes that its estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be different than that which is reflected in the historical income tax provisions. Such differences could have a material effect on the income tax provision and net income in the period in which such determination is made.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (Statement 123(R)). This Statement requires that the costs of employee share-based payments be measured at fair value on the awards’ grant date using an option-pricing model and recognized in the financial statements over the requisite service period. This Statement does not change the accounting for stock ownership plans, which are subject to American Institute of Certified Public Accountants SOP 93-6, “Employer’s Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans.” Statement 123(R) supersedes Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and its related interpretations, and eliminates the alternative to use Opinion 25’s intrinsic value method of accounting, which the Company is currently using.

25

Statement 123(R) allows for two alternative transition methods. The first method is the modified prospective application whereby compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered that are outstanding as of the adoption date will be recognized over the remaining service period. The compensation cost for that portion of awards will be based on the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for pro forma disclosures under Statement 123, as originally issued. All new awards and awards that are modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the adoption date will be accounted for under the provisions of Statement 123(R). The second method is the modified retrospective application, which requires that the Company restate prior period financial statements. The modified retrospective application may be applied either to all prior periods or only to prior interim periods in the year of adoption of this statement. The Company is currently determining which transition method it will adopt and is evaluating the impact Statement 123(R) will have on its financial position, results of operations, EPS and cash flows when the Statement is adopted. Upon making its determination of the transition method the Company will adopt Statement 123(R). The Company will adopt this Statement on January 1, 2006 in accordance with the requirements.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to the Year ended December 31, 2003

Revenues. Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004, were approximately $5.5 million, an increase of $2.2 million, as compared to revenues of approximately $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The 68% increase in revenues in 2004 was primarily attributable to the acquisition of Operational Research Consultants, Inc. (“ORC”). ORC contributed approximately $2.2 million in revenues subsequent to its acquisition by the Company on October 25, 2004.

Gross profit. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2004, was approximately $1.5 million, or 27% of revenues, an increase of $0.7 million as compared to gross profit of approximately $0.8 million, or 25% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in the amount of gross profit was materially attributable to greater operating margins within the business base of the Company’s recent acquisition of ORC, which experienced gross margins in services of approximately 40%.

Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004 were approximately $0.6 million, or 11% of revenues, as compared to $0.4 million, or 13% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2003. The $0.2 million increase in sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003, was primarily attributable to an increase in the amount of sales and marketing expenditures as a result of the Company’s recent acquisition of ORC.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004 were approximately $1.2 million, or 24% of revenues, as compared to $0.7 million, or 21% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2003. The $0.5 million increase in general and administrative expenses in 2004 was primarily attributable to an increase in the amount of general and administrative expenses associated with the acquisitions of both Chesapeake and ORC, and the Company’s implementation of its federal sector business initiative.

26

Interest income (expense). Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $5,841, a decrease of $5,710, or 51%, as compared to $11,551 for the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease in interest income in 2004 was primarily attributable to lesser amounts of available cash and other securities. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $38,144, an increase of $36,840, or 2,725%, as compared to $1,304 in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in interest expense in 2004 was primarily attributable to the Company’s increase in interest expense associated with its recent secured senior lending facility with RBC-Centura which was utilized in association with the purchase of ORC.

Loss from Financial Instruments. The Company recognized a loss from financial instruments of approximately $205,000 in the year ended December 31, 2004 which related to the difference between the fair value of the warrants issued to Barron Partners, LP in connection with the preferred stock financing and the market price of the common stock underlying such warrants at December 31, 2004. No such loss was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2003.

Net loss. As a result of the above, the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2004 was approximately $0.6 million, an increase of $0.3 million, as compared to the net loss of approximately $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to the Year ended December 31, 2002

Revenues. Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003, were approximately $3.3 million, a decrease of $0.2 million, as compared to revenues of approximately $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The 6% decrease in revenues in 2003 was primarily attributable to negative pricing pressures that resulted from the highly competitive economic environment that reduced average billing rates for the Company’s consultants.

Gross profit. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2003, was $0.8 million, or 25% of revenues, a decrease of $0.2 million as compared to gross profit of $1.0 million, or 29% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease in the amount of gross profit was attributable to a reduction in revenues and a decrease in operating margins caused by the inability of the Company to completely offset lower average bill rates with a decrease in corresponding consultant costs.

Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003 were $0.4 million, or 13% of revenues, as compared to $0.5 million, or 15% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2002. The $0.1 million decrease in sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003, was primarily attributable to the Company’s attempt to match the size of the Company’s sales force with the operational requirements of the Company’s business.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003 were $0.7 million, or 21% of revenues, as compared to $0.6 million, or 18% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2002. The $0.1 million increase in general and administrative expenses in 2003 was primarily attributable to increases in administrative labor cost.

27

Interest income (expense). Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $11,551, a decrease of $6,107, or 35%, as compared to $17,658 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease in interest income in 2003 was primarily attributable to lower interest rates. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $1,304, a decrease of $255, or 16%, as compared to $1,559 in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease in interest expense in 2003 was primarily attributable to the elimination of the capital lease obligations.

Net loss. As a result of the above, the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2003 was approximately $0.3 million, an increase of $0.2 million, as compared to the net loss of approximately $60,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has, since inception, financed its operations and capital expenditures through the sale of preferred and common stock, seller notes, convertible notes, convertible exchangeable debentures, senior secured loans and the proceeds from the exercise of the warrants related to a convertible exchangeable debenture. During 2004 and 2003, operations were materially financed with working capital, senior debt and the proceeds from a convertible preferred stock issuance.

Cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2004, was approximately $0.5 million as compared to cash used in operating activities of approximately $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease in cash balances available for operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were primarily a result of investments in which we expanded our sales and general and administrative cost structure to implement our growth strategy. Capital expenditures in property and equipment were approximately $15,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to capital expenditures in property and equipment of approximately $8,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had a net working capital deficit of approximately $4.0 million. Excluding the impact of the financial instruments associated with the issuance of the common stock warrants attributable to the preferred stock capital investment by Barron Partners, LP in the Company in October 2004 and discussed below, the working capital deficit would be reduced by approximately $3.8 million, resulting in a net working capital deficit of approximately $0.2 million. WidePoint’s primary source of liquidity consists of approximately $0.5 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately $3.0 million of accounts receivable. Current liabilities include approximately $2.4 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses; $1.6 million in a line of credit with RBC Centura Bank; and $3.8 million in financial instruments which may be converted to equity upon the extinguishment of the Company’s liquidation damages clause within the registration rights agreement entered into with Barron Partners, LP.

The market for the Company’s services is experiencing an environment of constrained technology investment resulting from an economic slowdown that has reduced new technology initiatives. As a result of this negative environment, the demand for IT consultants ranging from software programmers to network engineers has been negatively affected. This has reduced demand for consultants, as well as created an increase in competition from both domestic and foreign firms for the diminished amount of new and ongoing IT initiatives. WidePoint anticipates a reversal of these negative events in the future, as economic growth is restored, the constrained environment in new technology initiatives ebb, and the Company executes its current mergers and acquisitions strategy. Therefore, the Company’s business environment is characterized by rapid technological change; experiences times of high growth and contraction and is influenced by material events such as mergers and acquisitions that can substantially change the Company’s outlook.

28

Since 2002, WidePoint has embarked upon several new initiatives to counter the current negative environment within our industry and expand our capacity to restore revenue growth. The Company requires substantial working capital to fund the future growth of its business, particularly to finance accounts receivable, sales and marketing efforts, and capital expenditures. There are currently no commitments for capital expenditures. Future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the rate of revenue growth, if any, the timing and extent of spending for new product and service development, technological changes and market acceptance of the Company’s services.

On October 25 and 29, 2004, WidePoint completed financings with Barron Partners L.P. (“Barron”), a private equity fund that engages in investing primarily in private investments in publicly traded entities, for an aggregate amount of $3,580,000, under a preferred stock purchase agreement and related agreements. Net proceeds from the financing after costs and expenses, including fees of finders and agents, were approximately $3,030,000. WidePoint issued an aggregate of 2,045,714 shares of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that are convertible into an aggregate of 20,457,143 shares of its Common Stock at a conversion rate equal to $0.175 per share. In addition, WidePoint issued to Barron a warrant to purchase up to an additional 10,228,571 shares of its Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per common share. The shares of Common Stock which may be acquired by Barron upon its conversion of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and/or the exercise of its warrant are subject to contractual restrictions which restrict the ability of Barron and its affiliates to acquire shares of Common Stock which equal no more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of WidePoint’s Common Stock at any time. This contractual restriction may be removed upon 61 days notice to WidePoint from Barron, but in the event Barron elects to remove this restriction, then Barron and its affiliates agreed that Barron and its affiliates can only vote the shares of Common Stock held by Barron and its affiliates which result in Barron and its affiliates having no more than 22% of the total voting power of all outstanding shares of WidePoint’s Common Stock at any time. As a result of the Barron financing transaction, WidePoint issued warrants to Westcap Securities, Inc., a registered broker-dealer and WidePoint’s placement agent in such transaction, to purchase 511,428 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share, which warrants expire in October 2009. On April 8, 2005, Barron converted 100,000 shares of its preferred stock into 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock.

Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, between Barron and WidePoint, related to the stock issuances described in the preceding paragraph, WidePoint filed a registration statement on January 5, 2005, covering the resale of the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion and/or exercise of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and the warrants issued to Barron. If our registration statement is not declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission by April 23, 2005 and thereafter kept effective through October 20, 2007, subject to permissible blackout periods and registration maintenance periods, then WidePoint will be required to pay Barron a maximum penalty of up to $20,000 for each month the registration statement is not effective.

WidePoint believes that its current cash position and line of credit is sufficient to meet capital expenditure and working capital requirements for the near term. However, the growth and technological change of the market make it difficult to predict future liquidity requirements with certainty. Over the longer term, the Company must successfully execute its plans to increase revenue and income streams that will generate significant positive cash flows if it is to sustain adequate liquidity without impairing growth or requiring the infusion of additional funds from external sources. Additionally, a major expansion, such as occurred with the acquisition of ORC or any other major new subsidiaries, might require external financing that could include additional debt or equity capital. The Company obtained a one year senior line of credit from RBC-Centura Bank in October 2004 for up to $2.5 million dollars, collateralized against accounts receivables, that also allows for the expansion of this line of credit up to $5.0 million upon the successful completion of an additional acquisition. The interest rate on the line of credit is variable, and is based upon the prime lending rate. Approximately $1.2 million dollars of the senior line of credit was utilized in the acquisition of ORC. In addition, the Company raised approximately $3.6 million dollars in connection with the aforementioned equity investments by Barron Partners, LP, that were used in the acquisition of ORC. There can be no assurance that additional financing, if required, will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, for future acquisitions and/or growth initiatives.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no existing off-balance sheet arrangements as defined under SEC regulations.

29

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations at December 31, 2004 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on liquidity and cash flow in future periods.

(1)     WidePoint’s office located at One Lincoln Center, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 has a lease which runs through July 31, 2007, with payments in 2005 representing an obligation of approximately $42,800 and payments from 2006 to 2007 representing obligations of approximately $70,600. The office at 1736 South Park Court, Chesapeake, VA has a lease which runs through April 30, 2006, with payments in 2005 representing an obligation of approximately $26,700 and payments in 2006 representing obligations of approximately $9,000. The office at 11250 Waples Mill Rd., Fairfax, VA, has a lease which runs through March 15, 2009, with payments in 2005 representing an obligation of approximately $341,000 and payments in 2006 through 2009 representing obligations of approximately $1,188,000. The office at 1625 Prince St., Alexandria, VA, has a lease which runs through January 31, 2008, with payments in 2005 representing an obligation of approximately $91,700 and payments in 2006 through 2008 representing obligations of approximately $191,600.

Other

Inflation has not had a significant effect on the Company’s operations, as increased costs to the Company have generally been offset by increased prices of products and services sold, although this has been more recently compromised by some of the competitive pricing pressures referenced under Competition in Item 1 of this document.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

30

This report contains forward-looking statements setting forth the Company’s beliefs or expectations relating to future revenues and profitability. Actual results may differ materially from projected or expected results due to changes in the demand for the Company’s products and services, uncertainties relating to the results of operations, dependence on its major customers, risks associated with rapid technological change and the emerging services market, potential fluctuations in quarterly results, and its dependence on key employees and other risks and uncertainties affecting the technology industry generally. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

The Company is subject to market risk associated principally with changes in interest rates associated with its senior current short-term debt provided by RBC-Centura. These borrowings bear interest at variable rates and are determined by the Prime Rate. A hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates would have increased the Company’s annual interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 by less than $2,000.

WidePoint does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Excess cash is invested in short-term, investment grade, interest-bearing securities. Investments are made in accordance with an investment policy approved by the Board of Directors. Under this policy, no investment securities can have maturities exceeding one year and the average maturity of the portfolio cannot exceed 90 days.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

The consolidated financial statements and schedules required hereunder and contained herein are listed under Item 15 below.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of December 31, 2004. As a result of such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. In its efforts to continually monitor and improve its controls and procedures, the Company has identified a material weakness in the design of our internal controls due to insufficient technical accounting expertise within the accounting function to resolve non-routine or complex accounting matters such as occurs with a material acquisition such as we encountered in our recent acquisition of Operational Research Consultants, Inc. The Company is currently working to augment its accounting staff with resources to assist it in complex non-routine accounting issues as a result of events such as mergers and acquisitions. Further, the Company also identified a weakness in its controls and procedures in tracking its submissions to the Securities and Exchange Commission during the fourth quarter of 2004. The Company’s resource who was charged with filing the prior year's Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders with the Securities and Exchange Commission failed to complete such submissions and the Company failed to identify such non-submission. As such, the Company implemented an additional internal control to correct this event in the future. The additional internal control over financial reporting, which was instituted during the period ending December 31, 2004, involves an additional reporting process to track and confirm the filing of requisite filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission whereby confirmations are routed to executive management after each new filing is submitted and accepted to track and confirm the previous submissions. Otherwise, there were no other changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period ended December 31, 2004, that has materially affected and is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

31

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

32

Part III.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.

        The following sets forth information regarding the directors, executive officers and certain significant employees of the Company as of March 31, 2005:

Steve L. Komar has served as a director since December 1997 and became Chairman of the Board of Directors in October 2001. Mr. Komar has also served as Chief Executive Officer since December 2001. From June 2000 until December 2001, Mr. Komar served as a founding partner in C-III Holdings, a development stage financial services company. From 1991 to June 2000, Mr. Komar served as Group Executive Vice President of Fiserv, Inc., a company that provides advanced data processing services and related products to the financial industry. From 1980 to 1991, Mr. Komar served in a number of financial management positions with CitiGroup, including the role of Chief Financial Officer of Diners Club International and Citicorp Information Resources, respectively. Mr. Komar is a graduate of the City University of New York with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting and holds a Masters Degree in Finance from Pace University.

James T. McCubbin has served as a director and as WidePoint’s Secretary and Treasurer since November 1998. Since August 1998, Mr. McCubbin has also served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to that time, from December 1997 to August 1998, Mr. McCubbin served as the Company’s Vice President, Controller, Assistant Secretary and Treasurer. Prior to the commencement of his employment with WidePoint in November 1997, Mr. McCubbin held various financial management positions with several companies in the financial and government sectors. Mr. McCubbin is a graduate of the University of Maryland with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Finance and a Masters Degree in International Management.

33

James M. Ritter has served as a director since December 1999 and as Assistant Secretary since December 2002. Mr. Ritter is the retired Corporate Headquarters Chief Information Officer of Lockheed Martin Corporation. Prior to his retirement in February 2001, Mr. Ritter was employed at Lockheed Martin Corporation for over 32 years in various positions involving high level IT strategic planning and implementation, e-commerce development, integrated financial systems, and large-scale distributed systems.

G.W. Norman Wareham has served as a director since December 1997. Mr. Wareham served as Vice President, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer from September 1996 until August 1998. Mr. Wareham is President of Wareham Management Ltd. and provides management consulting and accounting services to public companies in Canada and the United States. Mr. Wareham is a certified general accountant and has been engaged in the public practice of accounting for over 20 years.

Mark Mirabile has served as a director since his appointment in April 2002. Mr. Mirabile has also served as Vice President and Chief Operations Officer since December 2001. From June 2000 to November 2001, Mr. Mirabile served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Prior to that time, from November 1992 to May 2000, Mr. Mirabile served as the Vice President of Eclipse Information Systems, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of WidePoint. Mr. Mirabile was a co-founder of Eclipse Information Systems, Inc. prior to its acquisition by WidePoint in December 1998. Mr. Mirabile has over 20 years experience in IT at both the executive and technical levels. He has an Associates Degree in Applied Science-Accounting from Daley Community College in Chicago.

Mr. Turissini presently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Operational Research Consultants, Inc. (“ORC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. WidePoint acquired ORC on October 25, 2004. Mr. Turissini was a founding partner of ORC in 1991 and served as its Chief Operations Officer since its inception. An innovator in systems engineering and integration, Mr. Turissini has focused in the field of Information Assurance and Information Security while at ORC. While under his leadership, ORC has played a key systems integrator role for the DoD Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), the standard information assurance program being implemented across all branches of the DoD (a user community of approximately 36 million personnel, devices, and applications) and has been certified as the first of three certificate authorities for the Department of Defense’s External Certificate Authority (ECA) program and by the General Services Administration to provide Access Certificates for Electronic Services (ACES). From 1982 until 1991, Mr. Turissini held various systems engineering and acquisition management positions in support of the U.S. Federal Government with a variety of companies including Tracor Applied Sciences, Inc., National Technologies Associates, Inc., and Gibbs and Cox, Inc. From 1981 to 1982, Mr. Turissini served in the Merchant Marine on various vessels as Engineer and Mate. Mr. Turissini is a graduate of the United States Merchant Marine Academy with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering and holds a Masters of Engineering Administration from The George Washington University.

34

Mark Fuller was elected to serve as a Class III director at the Company’s Stockholders Meeting on January 27, 2005 and presently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Chesapeake, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company acquired Chesapeake on March 24, 2004. Mr. Fuller was a co-founder of Chesapeake and has served as its Chief Executive Officer since its inception in February 2004. Mr. Fuller has also served as Chairman and CEO of Chesapeake Partners, Inc., a business consulting company, since October 2001. From December 2000 to October 2002, Mr. Fuller served as President of Network Services for Verizon Avenue, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Verizon Communications Inc. Verizon Avenue was originally founded as One Point Communications, where Mr. Fuller served as President of Network Services from January 1999 to December 2000. Prior thereto, Mr. Fuller served as Vice President of ACSI (which later became known as e.spire), from November 1994 to November 1998. From August 1993 to November 1994, Mr. Fuller served as Director of MCI Sales for Teleport Communications Group. From March 1988 to August 1993, Mr. Fuller held various management positions with MCI Telecommunications, Inc. Mr. Fuller also served 9 years in the United States Army where he rose to the rank of Major prior to leaving active duty in March 1988. Mr. Fuller is a graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York where he received a Bachelor of Science degree in Applied Science and Engineering. Effective as of April 8, 2005, Mark Fuller resigned from the Board of Directors of WidePoint pursuant to the contractual terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated March 24, 2004, by and among WidePoint and Chesapeake, as a result of a notice terminating the employment agreement between WidePoint and Mr. Fuller.

John Crowley was elected to serve as a Class III director at the Company’s Stockholders Meeting on January 27, 2005 and presently serves as the President of Chesapeake, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company acquired Chesapeake on March 24, 2004. Mr. Crowley was a co-founder of Chesapeake and has served as its President since its inception in February 2004. From September 2002 to March 2004, Mr. Crowley served as Vice President of Strategic Partnerships and Alliances at AT&T Corp. From March 1992 to September 2002, Mr. Crowley served as Vice President of Strategic Ventures and Alliances at MCI Telecommunications, Inc. From 1983 to 1992, Mr. Crowley held various management and consulting positions with different companies, including United City Traders and PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Crowley received his Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Georgetown University. Effective as of April 8, 2005, John Crowley resigned from the Board of Directors of WidePoint pursuant to the contractual terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated March 24, 2004, by and among WidePoint and Chesapeake, as a result of a notice terminating the employment agreement between WidePoint and Mr. Crowley.

Our executive officers are elected by, and serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors. There are no family relationships among any of the Company’s executive officers or directors.

Code of Ethics

The Company’s Board of Directors recently adopted a code of ethics for the chief executive and principal financial and accounting officers. The Company has posted a copy of the code on its website located at www.widepoint.com.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth the annual salary (column c) and bonus (column d) paid and options granted (column g) during each of the past three years to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, as well as the executive officers of the Company at December 31, 2004 whose annual salary and bonus in 2004 exceeded $100,000.

35

The following Option Grants Table sets forth, for each of the named executive officers, information regarding individual grants of options granted in 2004 and their potential realizable value. Information regarding individual option grants includes the number of options granted, the percentage of total grants to employees represented by each grant, the per-share exercise price and the expiration date. The potential realizable value of the options are based on assumed annual 0%, 5% and 10% rates of stock price appreciation over the term of the option.

36

The following Option Exercises and Year-End Value Table is set forth herein because it sets forth, for each of the named executive officers, information regarding the number and value of unexercised options at December 31, 2004. No options were exercised by such persons during 2004.

37

        No Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards Table is set forth herein because no long-term incentive plan awards were made to the above-named executive officers during 2004.

38

Employment Agreements and Arrangements

        On July 1, 2002, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Steve Komar, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company. The employment agreement had an initial term expiring on July 1, 2004 with four renewable one-year options remaining. On July 1, 2004, the Company and Mr. Komar exercised the first of such one-year renewal options. The agreement provides for (1) a base salary of $40,000 per year, (2) a home office/automobile expense allowance of $500 per month to cover such expenses incurred in the pursuit of Company business; (3) a phone allowance of $100 per month to cover such expenses incurred in the pursuit of Company business; (4) reimbursement for additional actual business expenses consistent with the Company’s existing policies that have been incurred for the benefit of the Company; (5) paid medical and other benefits consistent with the Company’s existing policies with respect to key executives of the Company, as such policies may be amended from time to time in the future; and (6) performance incentive bonuses as may be granted annually at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

        On July 1, 2002, the Company entered into an employment agreement with James McCubbin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company. The employment agreement had an initial term expiring on July 1, 2004 with four renewable one-year options remaining. On July 1, 2004, the Company and Mr. McCubbin exercised the first of such one-year renewal options. The agreement provides for (1) a base salary of $119,000 per year, (2) a home office/automobile expense allowance of $500 per month to cover such expenses incurred in the pursuit of Company business; (3) reimbursement for additional actual business expenses consistent with the Company’s existing policies that have been incurred for the benefit of the Company; (4) paid medical and other benefits consistent with the Company’s existing policies with respect to key executives of the Company, as such policies may be amended from time to time in the future; and (5) performance incentive bonuses as may be granted annually at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

39

        On July 1, 2002, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mark Mirabile, Chief Operations Officer of the Company. The employment agreement had an initial term expiring on July 1, 2004 with four renewable one-year options remaining. On July 1, 2004, the Company and Mr. Mirabile exercised the first of such one-year renewal options. The agreement provides for (1) a base salary of $119,000 per year, (2) a home office/automobile expense allowance of $500 per month to cover such expenses incurred in the pursuit of Company business; (3) reimbursement for additional actual business expenses consistent with the Company’s existing policies that have been incurred for the benefit of the Company; (4) paid medical and other benefits consistent with the Company’s existing policies with respect to key executives of the Company, as such policies may be amended from time to time in the future; and (5) performance incentive bonuses as may be granted annually at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

Stock Options

        1997 Stock Incentive Plan. In May 1997, the Board of Directors adopted, and in December 1997 the stockholders of the Company approved, the Company’s 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which provides for the award of a variety of equity-based incentives, including stock awards, stock options, stock appreciation rights, phantom shares, performance unit appreciation rights and dividend equivalents (collectively, “Stock Incentives”). The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee and provides for the grant of Stock Incentives to officers, key employees and consultants of the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock at not less than 100% of fair market value of the Common Stock on the date granted. The vesting and exercisability of any Stock Incentives granted under the Incentive Plan is subject to the determination of and criteria set by the Committee. As of December 31, 2004, options to purchase a total of 2,112,000 shares of Common Stock under the Plan, at prices ranging from $0.07 to $1.35 per share, were outstanding, of which options to purchase 1,684,500 shares were presently exercisable. Subsequent to December 31, 2004, the shareholders approved an amendment to expand the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan from 3,000,000 to 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.

        1997 Directors Formula Stock Option Plan. In May 1997, the Board of Directors adopted, and in December 1997 the stockholders of the Company approved, the Company’s 1997 Directors Formula Stock Option Plan (the “Director Plan”). Other than Messrs. Wareham and Ritter, directors of the Company who are not employed by the Company and who do not perform services for the Company are eligible to receive options under the Director Plan. The Director Plan is administered by a committee that presently consists of Messrs. Komar and McCubbin. Options become exercisable when vested and expire ten years after the date of grant, subject to such shorter period as may be provided in the agreement. A total of 140,000 shares of Common Stock are reserved for possible issuance upon the exercise of options under the Director Plan. During 2004, options granted to and vested with the directors were returned to the Company. There are no options presently outstanding under the Director Plan.

40

        Other Options. Options were granted on April 21, 2003 by the Board of Directors outside of the Director Plan to Messrs. Ritter and Wareham, who abstained from voting on such matter, for each of Messrs. Ritter and Wareham to purchase (i) 50,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.09 per share through April 21, 2013, of which options to purchase 25,000 shares vested on July 21, 2003, 12,500 shares vested on April 21, 2004, and the remaining 12,500 shares will vest on April 21, 2005, and (ii) 50,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.13 per share through December 31, 2013 with all of the shares vesting on December 31, 2004. Options were also granted to a pool of employees of ORC on October 25, 2004 for 1,111,111 common shares at a grant price of $0.45 of which no shares were vested as of December 31, 2004.

Directors’ Fees

Directors who are not officers or employees of the Company receive an annual fee of $12,000.

41

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The following table sets forth the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2004 by: (i) each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of such class of securities, (ii) each director of the Company and (iii) all directors and officers of the Company as a group.

42

(1)     Assumes in the case of each stockholder listed in the above list that all presently exercisable warrants or options held by such stockholder were fully exercised by such stockholder, without the exercise of any warrants or options held by any other stockholders.

(2)     The address of Mr. Higgins is 12408 Rivers Edge Drive, Potomac, Maryland 20854.

(3)     Includes (i) 865,000 shares of Common Stock purchased by Mr. Komar from the Company on July 8, 2002 in a private transaction without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, pursuant to the private offering exemption under Section 4(2) thereof, (ii) 500,000 shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by Mr. Komar from the Company at a price of $0.07 per share until July 7, 2012, pursuant to a stock option grant to him on January 7, 2002, (iii) 37,500 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.09 per share through April 24, 2013 pursuant to a stock option granted to him on April 24, 2003, (iv) 50,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.13 per share through December 31, 2013 pursuant to a stock option granted to him on December 31, 2003, with all such shares fully vesting on December 31, 2004 or by an earlier vesting decision as may be granted by the Compensation Committee, and (v) 333,333 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.235 per share through July 14, 2009 pursuant to a warrant granted to him on July 14, 2004. Does not include (i) 12,500 shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by Mr. Komar from the Company at a price of $0.09 per share until April 24, 2013 pursuant to a stock option grant to him on April 24, 2003 which shall vest on April 21, 2005 or by an earlier vesting decision as may be granted by the Compensation Committee, and (ii) a warrant to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.235 granted to Mr. Komar on July 14, 2004, which shall vest upon a determination by the Compensation Committee that the Company has achieved certain performance goals which change each year.

(4)     Includes (i) 37,500 shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by Mr. Wareham from the Company at a price of $0.09 per share until April 24, 2013, pursuant to a stock option granted to him on April 24, 2003 under the Plan, and (ii) 50,000 shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by him at a price of $0.13 per share through December 31, 2013, under an option granted on December 31, 2003, with all such shares vesting on December 31, 2004. Does not include 12,500 shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by him at a price of $0.09 per share through April 24 2013, under an option granted on April 24, 2003, with all such shares vesting on April 24, 2005.

(5)     Includes (i) 865,000 shares of Common Stock purchased by Mr. McCubbin from the Company on July 8, 2002 in a private transaction without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, pursuant to the private offering exemption under Section 4(2) thereof, (ii) 500,000 shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by Mr. McCubbin from the Company at a price of $0.17 per share until January 2, 2011, pursuant to a stock option grant to him on January 2, 2001, (iii) 1,000 shares of Common stock that may be purchased by Mr. McCubbin from the Company at a price of $1.35 per share until July 3, 2010, pursuant to a stock option granted to him on July 3, 2000, and (iv) 333,333 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.235 per share through July 14, 2009 pursuant to a warrant granted to him on July 14, 2004. Does not include a warrant to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.235 granted to Mr. McCubbin on July 14, 2004, which shall vest upon a determination by the Compensation Committee that the Company has achieved certain performance goals which change each year.

43

(6)     Includes (i) 1,500 shares of Common Stock owned directly by Mr. Ritter, (ii) 37,500 shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by Mr. Ritter from the Company at a price of $0.09 per share until April 24, 2013, pursuant to a stock option granted to him on April 24, 2003 under the Plan, and (iii) 50,000 shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by him at a price of $0.13 per share through December 31, 2013, under an option granted on December 31, 2003, with all such shares vesting on December 31, 2004. Does not include 12,500 shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by him at a price of $0.09 per share through April 24 2013, under an option granted on April 24, 2003, with all such shares vesting on April 24, 2005.

(7)     Includes (i) 865,000 shares of Common Stock purchased by Mr. Mirabile from the Company on July 8, 2002 in a private transaction without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, pursuant to the private offering exemption under Section 4(2) thereof, (ii) 170,000 shares of Common Stock issued to Mr. Mirabile in December 1998 in connection with the Company’s prior acquisition of Eclipse, (iii) 500,000 shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by Mr. Mirabile from the Company at a price of $0.17 per share until January 2, 2011, pursuant to a stock option grant to him on January 2, 2001, (iv) 1,000 shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by Mr. Mirabile from the Company at a price of $1.35 per share until July 3, 2010, pursuant to a stock option granted to him on July 3, 2000, and (v) 333,333 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.235 per share through July 14, 2009 pursuant to a warrant granted to him on July 14, 2004. Does not include a warrant to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.235 granted to Mr. Mirabile on July 14, 2004, which shall vest upon a determination by the Compensation Committee that the Company has achieved certain performance goals which change each year.

(8)     Includes 1,360,991 shares of Common Stock issued to Mr. Fuller in March 2004 in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Chesapeake Government Technologies, Inc. (“Chesapeake”). Does not include a warrant to purchase up to 1,814,658 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.235 issued to Mr. Fuller in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Chesapeake, which warrant will become exercisable in the event Mr. Fuller achieves certain performance criteria as set forth in the acquisition agreements entered into between the Company, Chesapeake and Mr. Fuller in connection with such acquisition. Mr. Fuller formerly served as the CEO of Chesapeake, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

(9)     Includes 1,360,993 shares of Common Stock issued to Mr. Crowley in March 2004 in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Chesapeake. Does not include a warrant to purchase up to 1,814,658 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.235 issued to Mr. Crowley in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Chesapeake, which warrant will become exercisable in the event Mr. Crowley achieves certain performance criteria as set forth in the acquisition agreements entered into between the Company, Chesapeake and Mr. Crowley in connection with such acquisition. Mr. Crowley formerly served as the President of Chesapeake, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

44

(10)     Includes 1,360,993 shares of Common Stock issued to Mr. Wright in March 2004 in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Chesapeake. Does not include a warrant to purchase up to 1,814,658 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.235 issued to Mr. Wright in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Chesapeake, which warrant will become exercisable in the event Mr. Wright achieves certain performance criteria as set forth in the acquisition agreements entered into between the Company, Chesapeake and Mr. Wright in connection with such acquisition. Mr. Wright serves as a consultant to the Company.

(11)     Includes 875,000 shares of Common Stock issued to Mr. Turissini in connection with the Company’s acquisition in October 2004 of Operational Research Consultants, Inc. (“ORC”). Does not include 1,851,852 shares which are held in escrow and subject to possible return to the Company in the event ORC does not achieve certain performance levels of a post-closing basis as provided in such acquisition agreements. Mr. Turissini serves as the C.E.O. of ORC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

(12)     Includes the shares referred to as included in notes (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9) and (11) above. Does not include the shares referred to as not included in notes (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10) and (11) above.

Barron Partners Stock Ownership

        In October 2004, the Company completed a financing with Barron Partners L.P. (“Barron”) for an aggregate amount of $3,580,000, under a preferred stock purchase agreement and related agreements. As a result of the financing, Barron owns 2,045,714 shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, which are convertible into a total of 20,457,140 shares of Common Stock, and Barron owns warrants entitling it to purchase a total of 10,228,571 shares of Common Stock. Barron’s rights to convert such Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and/or to exercise such warrants are subject to contractual limitations which restrict its ability to acquire such shares at any time in the event Barron would own more than a total of 4.99% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock following such conversion and/or exercise. The aforementioned restriction may be removed by Barron upon 61 days notice to the Company from Barron, but in the event that Barron elects to remove such restriction, then Barron and its affiliates can only vote the shares of Common Stock held by Barron and its affiliates which result in Barron and its affiliates having no more than 22% of the total voting power of all outstanding shares of Common Stock at any time. Assuming that Barron elects to remove the restriction on its ability to own no more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, then in the event Barron were to convert all of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of Common Stock and Barron were to exercise all of its warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock, then it would own an aggregate of 43% of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock, subject to the above-described voting restriction. On April 8, 2005, Barron converted 100,000 shares of preferred stock into 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock.

45

Acquisition of Chesapeake Government Technologies, Inc.

        On April 30, 2004, the Company closed upon the acquisition of all the issued and outstanding shares of Chesapeake Government Technologies, Inc. (“Chesapeake”), pursuant to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 24, 2004, by and among the Company, Chesapeake Acquisition Corporation, Chesapeake and Mark Fuller, John Crowley and Jay Wright, who were the sole stockholders of Chesapeake. The Company issued 4,082,980 shares of Common Stock to Messrs. Fuller, Crowley and Wright as the sole stockholders in consideration for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Chesapeake owned by them. In conjunction with this closing, the sole stockholders also entered into an escrow agreement with the Company and deposited 3,266,384 shares of the 4,082,980 newly issued shares of Common Stock into escrow.

        The 3,266,384 shares of Common Stock placed into escrow will be released to Messrs. Fuller, Crowley and Wright in the event of the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the merger agreement, which provides that during the period commencing after the closing of the merger and ending on December 31, 2005, the 3,266,384 shares of Common Stock will be released to Messrs. Fuller, Crowley and Wright in a ratio based on the amount of revenues actually received by the Company from the business acquired from Chesapeake. The December 31, 2005, escrow expiration date may be extended for one additional year by the Company in the event we determine that Messrs. Fuller, Crowley and Wright have achieved certain performance levels in the latter part of 2005. In the event the Company does not receive certain levels of revenues from the business acquired from Chesapeake, then any of the 3,266,384 shares of Common Stock to which Messrs. Fuller, Crowley and Wright have not become entitled to receive will be returned to the Company. For the period ending December 31, 2004, 542,220 escrow shares representing 180,740 escrow shares each were released to Messrs. Fuller, Crowley and Wright, respectively.

        The merger agreement also provides that in the event the revenues actually received by the Company from the business acquired from Chesapeake equals or exceeds certain levels before December 31, 2005, then the Company will prepare a proxy statement for its then next ensuing Annual Meeting of Stockholders to ask the Company’s stockholders to vote upon a proposal to increase the size of the Board of Directors from a total of seven persons to a total of nine persons, with one of the candidates for such two newly created director positions to be nominated by the sole stockholders and with the other candidate to be mutually agreed upon between the Company and the sole stockholders; provided, however that at any time after Messrs. Fuller, Crowley or Wright are no longer employed by the Company, then the persons who are serving on our Board of Directors as designees of Messrs. Fuller, Crowley and Wright shall resign from their positions as directors of WidePoint.

46

        Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the Company caused Chesapeake to enter into employment/non-competition agreements with each of Mark Fuller and John Crowley and a consulting agreement with Jay Wright. As part of the potential compensation that may be earned by each of Messrs. Fuller, Crowley and Wright, the Company issued to each such person a warrant to purchase 1,814,658 additional shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.235 per share, with each such warrant only being exercisable in the event that the revenues actually received by the Company from the business acquired from Chesapeake exceed the maximum levels required for the sole stockholders to receive all of the 3,266,384 shares of Common Stock placed in escrow.

        In order to allow WidePoint to consummate the financing transactions with Barron in which WidePoint needed a sufficient number of authorized but unreserved shares of Common Stock to underlie a portion of the shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and a portion of the warrants issued by WidePoint to Barron and Westcap, Messrs. Komar, McCubbin, Mirabile, Fuller, Crowley and Wright agreed in October 2004 with WidePoint to make the aggregate amount of 9,443,974 shares of Common Stock underlying their warrants to be thereafter subject to the approval by WidePoint’s stockholders of an increase in the total number of authorized shares of Common Stock of WidePoint. On January 27, 2005, the stockholders of the Company approved the required amendment to increase the total number of authorized shares of Common Stock of WidePoint.

Acquisition of Operational Research Consultants, Inc.

        On October 25, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of Operational Research Consultants, Inc. (“ORC”) a privately held IT and engineering firm providing mission-critical sensitive and strategic information security solutions to the United States Government. To finance the acquisition, the Company completed a convertible preferred financing with Barron, an accredited investor, and utilized a line of credit which the Company maintains with RBC-Centura Bank. The Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with ORC and Fred Thornton, Richard Montgomery and Daniel Turissini, the sole stockholders of ORC, to effectuate the acquisition, and entered into a preferred stock purchase agreement and a registration rights agreement with Barron in connection with the financing.

        Pursuant to the stock purchase agreement between the Company, ORC and Messrs. Thornton, Montgomery and Turissini, the Company agreed to purchase and acquire all of ORC’s outstanding Common Stock. In consideration for the ORC stock, the Company paid Messrs. Thornton, Montgomery and Turissini an aggregate of $5,000,000 payable in a combination of cash, promissory note and Common Stock, less a receivables holdback. The receivables holdback will be held in escrow and released at certain milestone dates over a three-year period pursuant to a certain formula. The promissory note was extinguished in November of 2005.

47

        The aggregate consideration to be paid by the Company to Messrs. Thornton, Montgomery and Turissini shall be adjusted in the event that ORC’s 2004 revenue is less than $8,000,000 and for any set-offs, recoupments and/or payments of losses. The agreement also provides a clawback provision in the event that the losses or indemnity amounts exceed the receivables holdback.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

Promissory Notes with Executive Officers of the Company

        Pursuant to stock purchase agreements entered into on July 8, 2002, between the Company and each of Messrs. Komar, McCubbin and Mirabile, the Company privately sold 865,000 shares of Common Stock to each such person without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, pursuant to the private offering exemption under Section 4(2) thereof, in consideration for the issuance by each such person to the Company of a three-year full-recourse promissory note in the principal amount of $181,650 (which equals $0.07 per share, being the closing price of the Common Stock on July 8, 2002) and bearing interest at 5% per annum, with equal annual principal payments of $60,550 being due on July 5th of each year. In 2004, the largest aggregate amount of indebtedness outstanding under these promissory notes equaled the total of the following approximate amounts for each such person: Mr. Komar – $64,000; Mr. McCubbin – $64,000; and Mr. Mirabile – $64,000. As of December 31, 2004, the amount of indebtedness outstanding under these promissory notes equaled the total of the following approximate amounts for each such person: Mr. Komar — $24,000; Mr. McCubbin — $24,000; and Mr. Mirabile — $24,000.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

48

Part IV.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

All other schedules are omitted either because they are not applicable or required, or because the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto:

49

* — Management contract or compensatory plan

50

* — Management contract or compensatory plan

51

* — Management contract or compensatory plan

52

* — Management contract or compensatory plan

53

* — Management contract or compensatory plan

54

55

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons, on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

56

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
WidePoint Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of WidePoint Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of WidePoint Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of their operations and their consolidated cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Chicago, Illinois
April 14, 2005

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements

F-1

WIDEPOINT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements

F-2

WIDEPOINT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated statements of operations

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements

F-3

WIDEPOINT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements

F-4

WIDEPOINT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows