WILLAMETTE VALLEY VINEYARDS INC - Annual Report: 2018 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark
One)
|
|
|
|
⌧
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
☐
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from _________________ to
_______________________
|
Commission
file number: 000-21522
|
|
WILLAMETTE VALLEY VINEYARDS, INC.
|
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Oregon
|
93-0981021
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification No.) |
8800
Enchanted Way, S.E.
Turner, OR 97392 |
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (503) 588-9463
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock (Title of class) |
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock (Title of class) |
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:
Yes ☐ No ⌧
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act:
Yes ☐ No ⌧
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
Yes ⌧ No ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted
on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files): Yes ⌧ No ☐
1
Indicate by check
mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment
to this Form 10-K: ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act:
Large accelerated
filer ☐ Accelerated
filer ☐ Non-accelerated
filer ☐ Smaller reporting
company ⌧
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act):
Yes ☐ No ⌧
Yes ☐ No ⌧
The aggregate
market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of June 30, 2018 was approximately
$37,932,314.
The number of
outstanding shares of the registrant’s Common Stock as of
March 21, 2019 was 4,964,529.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
2
WILLAMETTE
VALLEY VINEYARDS, INC.
FORM 10-K
FORM 10-K
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
PAGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
||
|
14
|
||
|
20
|
||
|
20
|
||
|
20
|
||
|
20
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
||
|
21
|
||
|
21
|
||
|
30
|
||
|
30
|
||
|
48
|
||
|
48
|
||
|
48
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
||
|
52
|
||
|
53
|
||
|
54
|
||
|
55
|
||
|
56
|
3
WILLAMETTE
VALLEY VINEYARDS, INC.
FORM 10-K
FORM 10-K
As used in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, “we,”
“us,” “our” and “the Company”
refer to Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.
Forward Looking Statements
This Annual Report
on Form 10-K, including any information incorporated by reference,
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, referred to as the
“Securities Act”, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, referred to as the
“Exchange Act”. In some cases, you can identify
forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,”
“will,” “should,” “expect,”
“plan,” “intend,” “forecast,”
“anticipate,” “believe,”
“estimate,” “predict,”
“potential,” “seeks,”
“estimates” or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology, which when used are meant to signify the
statement as forward-looking. However, not all forward-looking
statements contain these words. Forward-looking statements include,
but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives,
expectations and intentions, statements concerning the long-term
prospects for growth in the Oregon wine industry, the availability
to us of high-quality grapes for purchase, and other statements
that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements are
not guaranteeing of future performance and involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and situations that are difficult to
predict and that may cause our own, or our industry’s actual
results, to be materially different from the future results that
are expressed or implied by these statements. Accordingly, actual
results may differ materially from those anticipated or expressed
in such statements as a result of a variety of factors, including
those set forth under Item 1A “Risk Factors” in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We urge you to carefully review the
disclosures we make concerning risks and other factors that may
affect our business and operations. We caution you not to place
undue reliance on forward looking statements, which speak only as
of the date of this report. We do not intend, and we undertake no
obligation, to update any forward information to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events, unless required by law to do
so.
Business
Introduction – Willamette Valley
Vineyards, Inc. (“the Company” or “WVV”)
was formed in May 1988 to produce and sell premium, super premium
and ultra-premium varietals. The Company was originally established
as a sole proprietorship by Oregon winegrower Jim Bernau in 1983.
The Company is headquartered in Turner, Oregon, which is just south
of the state capitol of Salem, Oregon. The Company’s wines
are made from grapes grown in vineyards owned, leased or contracted
by the Company, and from grapes purchased from other nearby
vineyards. The grapes are harvested, fermented and made into wine
at the Company’s Turner winery (the “Estate
Winery” or “Winery”) and the wines are sold
principally under the Company’s Willamette Valley Vineyards
label, but also under the Griffin Creek, Tualatin Estate, Pambrun,
Maison Bleue and Elton labels. The Company also owns the Tualatin
Estate Vineyards and Winery, located near Forest Grove, Oregon (the
“Tualatin Winery”).
Segments - The Company has identified
two operating segments, direct sales and distributor sales, based
upon their different distribution channels, margins and selling
strategies. Direct sales include retail sales in our tasting room
and remote sites, wine club sales, on-site events, kitchen and
catering sales and other sales made directly to the consumer
without the use of an intermediary. Distributor sales include all
sales through a third party where prices are given at a wholesale
rate.
Products – Under its Willamette
Valley Vineyards label, the Company produces and sells the
following types of wine in 750 ml bottles: Pinot Noir, the
brand’s flagship and its largest selling varietal in 2018,
$24 to $100 per bottle; Chardonnay, $25 to $45 per bottle; Pinot
Gris, $17 per bottle; Pinot Blanc, $24 per bottle; Rose, $18 to $24
per bottle; Methode Champenoise Brut, $55 per bottle; and Riesling,
$14 per bottle (all bottle prices included herein are the suggested
retail prices). The Company’s mission for this brand is to
become the premier producer of Pinot Noir from the Pacific
Northwest.
4
Under its Tualatin
Estate Vineyards label, the Company currently produces and sells
the following type of wine in 750 ml bottles: Semi-Sparkling
Muscat, $19 per bottle.
Under its Griffin
Creek label, the Company produces and sells the following types of
wine in 750 ml bottles: Syrah, the brand’s flagship, $45 per
bottle; Merlot, $45 per bottle; Cabernet Sauvignon, $45 per bottle;
Grenache, $45 per bottle; Cabernet Franc, $45 per bottle; The
Griffin (a Bordeaux style blend), $65 per bottle; and Viognier, $30
per bottle. This brand’s mission is to be the highest quality
producer of Bordeaux and Rhone varietals in Southern
Oregon.
Under its Elton
label, the Company produces and sells the following types of wine
in 750 ml bottles: Pinot Noir, $75 per bottle and Chardonnay, $75
per bottle.
Under its Pambrun
label, the Company produces and sells the following types of wine
in 750 ml bottles: Chrysologue, $65 per bottle; Merlot, $65 per
bottle; and Cabernet Sauvignon, $70 per bottle.
Under its Maison
Bleue label, the Company produces and sells the following types of
wine in 750 ml bottles: Graviéres Syrah, $65 per bottle;
Voyaguer Syrah, $50 per bottle; and Voltigeur Viognier, $40 per
bottle.
Under its Made in
Oregon Cellars label, the Company produces and sells the following
type of wine in 750 ml bottles: Oregon Blossom (off-dry rosé),
$12 per bottle.
The Company holds
U.S. federal and/or Oregon state trademark registrations for the
trademarks material to the business, including but not limited to,
the WILLAMETTE VALLEY VINEYARDS, BIO-CASK, DAEDALUS CELLARS,
OREGON’S LANDMARK WINERY, GRIFFIN CREEK, GRIFFIN, ELTON,
WILLAMETTE, WVV, SIP.SAVE, WHOLE CLUSTER, MADE IN OREGON CELLARS,
OREGON BLOSSOM, INGRAM ESTATE, IT’S WILLAMETTE, DAMMIT,
FULLER, and NATOMA marks. Additionally, the Company has allowed use
on PAMBRUN, PIERRE PAMBRUN and PINOT BLACK.
Market overview – The United
States wine industry has seen a rapid increase in the number of
wineries that are being established throughout the country. From
2009 to 2018, U.S. wineries grew in number from 6,357 to 9,654,
according to Statistica, and are one of the fastest growing
segments in agriculture with an annual growth of 5.8% during that
period. U.S. wineries increased production in 2016, the most recent
year such data is available, by 5% compared to 2015 and produced
approximately 339 million cases according to The Wine
Institute.
The United States
is the largest wine market in the world in terms of revenues and
volume representing 13.4% of world consumption in 2015, the last
year in which data is available. In 2018 U.S. wine sales reached
$46.6 billion, according to Wines and Vines, a 3% increase from
2017. Total U.S. wine shipments reached 408 million cases in 2018
with total US wine sales, domestic and import, revenue of $70.5
billion, according to Wines and Vines. U.S. wine sales have grown
for years and there were 644,647 locations in the United States
that sold wine in 2017, the last year in which such data is
available, an increase of more than 100,000 locations over the past
10 years according to Nielsen.
According to the
Wine Marketing Council, U.S. consumers continue to enjoy wine with
120 million Americans, approximately 40% of the adult population,
drinking wine in 2017. Of U.S. wine consumers in 2017, 59% were
female and 41% male with 35% of consumers drinking wine more than
once per week according to the Wine Marketing Council. Domestic
wine accounted for 66.7% of U.S. sales in 2017 according to Wines
and Vines. The five most popular wines in 2017 were chardonnay,
cabernet sauvignon, red blends, pinot gris and pinot noir,
according to Wine Business Monthly.
In 2017,
off-premise sales accounted for roughly 78% of the U.S. market with
an average bottle price of $10 according to Nielsen. Although
direct to consumer (DTC) sales represented less than 2% of the U.S.
volume in 2017, such sales increased by 15.5% in 2017 from 2016
according to Sovos.
In a 2018 American
Wine Consumer Preference Survey, by Sonoma State University and the
Wine Business Institute, American wine consumers from all 50 states
were sampled regarding their wine consumption. Of those sampled,
50% reported they consume wine daily or several times per week
making them “High Frequency Wine Drinkers” with 17%
reporting that they drink wine once per week and the remaining 33%
drinking wine less frequently. Respondents demonstrated a
preference for red wine, with 69% listing it as one of their
favorites, 67% listing white wine as one of their favorites and 40%
listing Rose. Price and brand topped the list of decision-making
reasons when purchasing wine for home consumption at 80% and 69%
respectively. Of those surveyed 32% listed the most common purchase
price being $11 to $15 however 46% indicated that they had paid $50
to $99 a bottle for a special occasion.
5
The Oregon wine industry – Oregon
is a relatively new wine-producing region in comparison to
California and France. In 1966, there were only two commercial
wineries licensed in Oregon. According to the University of Oregon
Institute of Policy Research (“UOIPR”) in 2017, the
most recent year such data is available, there were 769 commercial
wineries licensed in Oregon, an increase of 6.1% from 2016, and
33,996 planted acres of wine grape vineyards, an increase of 11.7%,
31,008 acres of which were harvested. Oregon wine grapes produced a
2017 crop with a total value of $192 million, an increase of 14.3%
from 2016 according to UOIPR. Pinot Noir leads all varieties
accounting for 58% of planted acreage and 59% of production.
According to UOIPR, Oregon case sales in 2017 are estimated at 3.6
million, up from 3.4 million in 2016, a 6% increase. UOIPR
estimated case sales in dollars for 2017 to be approximately $551
million, a 4.1% increase from 2016.
Because of climate,
soil and other growing conditions, we believe the Willamette Valley
in western Oregon is ideally suited to growing superior quality
Pinot Noir, Chardonnay, Pinot Gris and Riesling wine grapes. Some
of Oregon’s Pinot Noir, Pinot Gris and Chardonnay wines have
developed outstanding reputations, winning numerous national and
international awards. Though Oregon contributed only 1% of domestic
wine production, it accounted for 21% of domestic wines that
garnered a score of 90 points or higher by Wine Spectator in
2015.
Oregon does have
certain disadvantages as a wine-producing region. Oregon’s
wines are lesser known to consumers worldwide and the total wine
production of Oregon wineries is small relative to California and
French competitors. Greater worldwide label recognition and larger
production levels give Oregon’s competitors certain
financial, marketing, distribution and unit cost
advantages.
Furthermore,
Oregon’s Willamette Valley has an unpredictable rainfall
pattern in early autumn. If significantly above-average rains occur
just prior to the autumn grape harvest, the quality of harvested
grapes is often materially diminished, thereby affecting that
year’s wine quality.
Finally,
phylloxera, an aphid-like insect that feeds on the roots of
grapevines, has been found in several commercial vineyards in
Oregon. Contrary to the California experience, most Oregon
phylloxera infestations have expanded very slowly and done only
minimal damage. Nevertheless, phylloxera does constitute a
significant risk to Oregon vineyards. Prior to the discovery of
phylloxera in Oregon, all vine plantings in the Company’s
Estate Vineyard, in Turner, Oregon, were with non-resistant
rootstock. In 1997, the Company purchased Tualatin Vineyards at the
Tualatin Winery, which has phylloxera at its site. All current
plantings are with, and all future planting will be with,
phylloxera-resistant rootstock at that location. The Company takes
commercially reasonable precautions in an effort to prevent the
spread of phylloxera to its Turner site.
As a result of
these factors, subject to the risks and uncertainties identified in
this Annual Report, the Company believes that long-term prospects
for growth in the Oregon wine industry are excellent. The Company
believes that over the next several years the Oregon wine industry
will grow at a faster rate than the overall domestic wine industry,
and that much of this growth will favor producers of premium, super
premium and ultra-premium wines such as the Company’s Estate,
Elton, Pambrun, Maison Bleue and Griffin Creek brands.
2017 Oregon harvest – The Oregon
Vineyard and Winery Census Report states that 2017 saw increases in
sales for Oregon wine alongside increased vineyard production.
Pinot Noir continued to lead statewide production representing 58%
of planted acreage and 59% of production in 2017. The overall
number of wineries increased from 725 in 2016 to 769 in 2017 with
total tons crushed in Oregon increasing 9.3% from 70,579 tons in
2016 to 77,170 tons in 2017.
2018 Oregon harvest – There is no
official data available on the 2018 Oregon harvest as of the date
of this report.
6
Company Strategy
The Company, one of
the largest wine producers in Oregon by volume, believes its
success is dependent upon its ability to: (1) grow and purchase
high quality vinifera wine grapes; (2) vinify the grapes into
premium, super premium and ultra-premium wine; (3) achieve
significant brand recognition for its wines, first in Oregon and
then nationally and internationally; (4) effectively distribute and
sell its products nationally; and (5) continue to build on its base
of direct to consumer sales. The Company’s goal is to
continue to build on a reputation for producing some of
Oregon’s finest, most sought-after wines.
Based upon several
highly regarded surveys of the U.S. wine industry, the Company
believes that successful wineries exhibit the following four key
attributes: (i) focus on production of high-quality premium, super
premium and ultra-premium varietal wines; (ii) achieve brand
positioning that supports high bottle prices for its high quality
wines; (iii) build brand recognition by emphasizing restaurant
sales; and (iv) develop strong marketing advantages (such as a
highly visible winery location, successful support of distribution,
and life-long customer service programs).
To successfully
execute this strategy, the Company has assembled a team of
accomplished winemaking professionals and has constructed and
equipped the Estate Winery into a 12,784 square foot
state-of-the-art winery that includes a 12,500 square foot outdoor
production area for the harvesting, pressing and fermentation of
wine grapes.
The Company’s
marketing and selling strategy is to sell its premium, super
premium and ultra-premium cork-finished-wine through a combination
of direct sales at the Estate Winery, the McMinnville Tasting Room
in McMinnville, Oregon, the Maison Bleue Tasting Room in Walla
Walla, Washington and Tualatin Estate Winery and sales through
independent distributors and wine brokers who market the
Company’s wine in specific targeted areas.
The Company
believes the location of the Estate Winery next to Interstate 5,
Oregon’s major north-south freeway, significantly increases
direct sales opportunities to consumers. The Company believes this
location provides high visibility for the Winery to passing
motorists, thus enhancing recognition of the Company’s
products in retail outlets and restaurants. We also believe the
Company’s remodeled Hospitality Center, at the Estate Winery,
has further increased the Company’s direct sales and enhanced
public recognition of its wines.
To remain competitive in the premium, super premium and
ultra-premium market, the Company has embarked on a brand expansion
project and is in the process of developing a brand and future
winery in the Walla Walla AVA under the names Pambrun and Maison
Bleue. This future winery is expected to produce small vintages of
Cabernet Sauvignon and other Bordeaux-varietals, under the Pambrun
brand, and Syrah and other Rhone-varietals, under the Maison Bleue
brand, to compete in the ultra-premium wine market. The Company has
released wines under the Pambrun label beginning with the 2015
vintage year and Maison Bleue label beginning with the 2016
vintage. Additionally, the Company has developed a single vineyard
brand near Hopewell, Oregon adjacent to the current site of Elton
Vineyards to produce wine under the Elton label. This brand is
expected to produce primarily Pinot Noir and Chardonnay, also for
sale in the ultra-premium space. The Company has recently released
wines under the Elton label beginning with the 2015 vintage year.
In December 2016 the Company purchased approximately 40 acres in
the Dundee, Oregon area, purchased another 17 acres in January 2017
and through a lot line adjustment added 3 acres to the
property. The Company is in the process of developing a plan
for the use and development of that property as a new winery and
tasting room, called Bernau Estate. In 2019 the Company plans to
open a wine tasting and custom blending facility under the
name Willamette Wineworks, in historic Folsom, California, and sell
wine under the brand name Natoma as well as its other
brands.
Vineyards
The Company owns
and leases approximately 914 acres of land, of which 709 acres are
currently planted as vineyards or is suitable for future vineyard
planting. The vineyards the Company owns and leases are all
certified sustainable by LIVE (Low Input Viticulture and Enology)
and Salmon Safe. At full production, the Company anticipates these
vineyards would enable the Company to grow approximately 67% of the
grapes needed to meet the winery’s current production
capacity, of 524,000 gallons (220,000 cases), at its Estate
Winery.
7
The following table
summarizes the Company’s acreage:
|
|
ACRES
|
|
|
TONS
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Vineyard Name
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Producing
|
|
|
Pre-Production
|
|
|
Plantable
|
|
|
Non-Plantable
|
|
|
Harvest
2018
|
|
|
Harvest
2017
|
|
|||||||
Owned Vineyards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WVV Estate
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Tualatin Estate
Vineyard
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Ingram Vineyard
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Pambrun Vineyard
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loeza Vineyard
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Louisa Vineyard
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Rocks Vineyard
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Bernau Estate
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Dayton Vineyard
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sub-Total
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased Vineyards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Michael
Vineyard
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
Meadowview
Vineyard
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
Elton Vineyard
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
Ingram Vineyard
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Bernau Estate
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sub-Total
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracted
Vineyards*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
3,422
|
|
|
*
|
Contracted acreage
is estimated
|
WVV Estate – Established in 1983,
the Company’s Estate Vineyard (the “Estate
Vineyard”) is located at the Winery location south of Salem,
near Turner, Oregon. The Estate Vineyard uses an elaborate trellis
design known as the Geneva Double Curtain. The Company has incurred
the additional expense of constructing this trellis because it
doubles the number of canes upon which grape clusters grow and
spreads these canes for additional solar exposure and air
circulation. Research and practical applications of this trellis
design indicate that it should improve grape quality through
smaller clusters and berries over traditional designs. The Company
planted 1.5 acres in 2018. The Company does not intend to plant at
WVV Estate in 2019.
Tualatin Estate Vineyard –
Established in 1973 at the Tualatin Winery location near Forest
Grove, Oregon, the Company’s Tualatin Estate Vineyards is one
of the oldest vineyards in Oregon. It was purchased by the Company
in 1997. A series of sale-leaseback transactions split the property
into two additional vineyards, and the Company continues to lease
and manage the Peter Michael Vineyard and Meadowview Vineyard,
located adjacent to the Tualatin Vineyard. The Company replanted
2.5 acres in 2018 and does not intend to plant at Tualatin Estate
Vineyard in 2019.
Ingram Estate and Elton Vineyard
– In 2008 the Company purchased 86 acres near Hopewell,
Oregon, for vineyard plantings. Adjacent to the purchased land is
an additional 110 leased acres, also for vineyard development. The
Company believes the site is ideally situated to grow premium Pinot
Noir. The Ingram site is also adjacent to Elton Vineyards, where
the Company leases 54 acres of established vineyards. The Company
planted 17 acres at leased Ingram in 2018 and does not intend to
plant at Ingram or Elton Vineyards in 2019.
Pambrun Vineyards – In 2015, the
Company purchased 42 acres in the Walla Walla AVA near the town of
Milton-Freewater, Oregon. Additionally, the Company purchased an
additional 45 adjoining acres in 2017. The Company believes this
site is ideal to grow Cabernet Sauvignon and other
Bordeaux-varietals. Wines produced from this vineyard are sold
under the Pambrun label. The Company planted 4 acres in 2018 and
does not intend to plant in 2019.
8
Loeza Vineyard – The Company
purchased 62 acres near Gaston, Oregon in 2014, for vineyard
plantings, and believes the site is ideally situated to grow
premium Pinot Gris and Pinot Noir. The site is close to Tualatin
Vineyards which allows the Company to leverage existing crews for
vineyard development and operations. The Company planted 11 acres
in 2018 and intends to plant 2 acres in 2019.
Louisa Vineyard – The Company
purchased 53 acres in the Ribbon Ridge sub-AVA in 2016 for vineyard
plantings and believes the site is suitable for growing
ultra-premium Pinot Noir. The Company does not intend to plant at
Louisa Vineyard in 2019.
Rocks Vineyard –
The Company purchased approximately 37 acres in the new Rocks
District of Milton-Freewater appellation near Milton-Freewater,
Oregon in 2016. The Company planted 5 acres in 2018 and intends to
plant 10 acres in 2019. Grapes from this vineyard will go to
the Maison Bleue label.
Bernau Estate –
The Company purchased approximately 17 acres in Dundee, Oregon in
January 2017 comprised of 15 acres of producing Pinot Noir.
Additionally, the Company added 3 acres through a lot line
adjustment to add to the parcel. The Company leases 20
adjoining acres. The Company planted 4.5 acres in 2018 and intends
to plant 2.5 acres in 2019.
Dayton Vineyard – The Company
purchased 40 acres in Dayton, Oregon in December 2016. The Company
has no plans for planting this site in 2019.
Grape Vines - Beginning in 1997, the
Company embarked on a major effort to improve the quality of its
flagship varietal by planting new Pinot Noir clones that originated
directly from the cool climate growing region of Burgundy rather
than the previous source, Napa, California, where winemakers
believe the variety adapted to the warmer climate over the many
years it was grown there.
These new French
clones are called “Dijon clones” after the University
of Dijon in Burgundy, which assisted in their selection and
shipment to a U.S. government authorized quarantine site, and then
two years later to Oregon winegrowers. The most desirable of these
new Pinot Noir clones are numbered 113, 114, 115, 667, 777 and 943.
In addition to certain flavor advantages, these clones ripen up to
two weeks earlier, allowing growers to pick before heavy autumn
rains. Heavy rains can dilute concentrated fruit flavors and
promote bunch rot and spoilage. These Pinot Noir clones were
planted at the Tualatin Vineyards with phylloxera-resistant
rootstock and the 667 and 777 clones have been grafted onto seven
acres of self-rooted, non-phylloxera-resistant vines at the
Company’s Estate Vineyard.
New clones of
Chardonnay preceded Pinot Noir into Oregon and were planted at the
Company’s Estate Vineyard on phylloxera-resistant
rootstock.
Grape supply – In 2018, the
Company’s producing acres in the Estate Vineyard yielded
approximately 313 tons of grapes. Tualatin/Peter Michael/Meadowview
Vineyards produced an aggregate of 813 tons of grapes in 2018.
Elton and Ingram Vineyards produced 283 tons of grapes in 2018.
Bernau Estate produced 71 tons of grapes in 2018. Pambrun Vineyard
produced 21 tons of grapes in 2018.
The Company
fulfills its remaining grape needs by purchasing grapes from other
nearby vineyards at competitive prices. In 2018, the Company
purchased an additional 485 tons of grapes from other growers. The
Company cannot grow enough grapes to meet anticipated production
needs, and therefore contracts grape purchases to make up the
difference. Contracted grape purchases are considered an important
component of the Company’s long-term growth and
risk-management plan. The Company believes high quality grapes will
be available for purchase in sufficient quantity to meet the
Company’s requirements. Additionally, the Company will
continue to evaluate opportunities to purchase properties for
future vineyards.
Management believes
that the grapes grown on the Company’s vineyards establish a
foundation of quality through the Company’s farming
practices, upon which the quality of the Company’s wines is
built. Wine produced from grapes grown in the Company’s own
vineyards may be labeled as “Estate Bottled” wines.
These wines traditionally sell at a premium over non-estate bottled
wines.
Viticultural conditions –
Oregon’s Willamette Valley is recognized as a premier
location for growing certain varieties of high-quality wine grapes,
particularly Pinot Noir, Pinot Gris, Chardonnay and Riesling. The
Company believes that the Estate Vineyard’s growing
conditions, including its soil, elevation, slope, rainfall, evening
marine breezes and solar orientation are among the most ideal
conditions in the United States for growing certain varieties of
high-quality wine grapes. The Estate Vineyard’s grape growing
conditions compare favorably to those found in some of the famous
Viticultural regions of France. Western Oregon’s latitude
(42o–46o
North) and relationship to the eastern edge of a major ocean is
very similar to certain centuries-old wine grape growing regions of
France.
9
The Estate
Vineyard’s soil type is Jory/Nekia, a dark, reddish-brown,
silky clay loam over basalt bedrock, noted for being well drained,
acidic, of adequate depth, retentive of appropriate levels of
moisture and particularly suited to growing high quality wine
grapes.
The Estate
Vineyard’s elevation ranges from 533 feet to 800 feet above
sea level with slopes from 2% to 30% (predominately 12-20%). The
Estate Vineyard’s slope is oriented to the south, southwest
and west. Average annual precipitation at the Estate Vineyard is
41.3 inches; average annual air temperature is 52 to 54 degrees
Fahrenheit, and the length of each year’s frost-free season
averages from 190 to 210 days. These conditions compare favorably
with conditions found throughout the Willamette Valley viticultural
region and other domestic and foreign viticultural regions, which
produce high quality wine grapes.
In the Willamette
Valley, permanent vineyard irrigation generally is not required.
The average annual rainfall provides sufficient moisture to avoid
the need to irrigate the Estate Vineyard. However, if the need
should arise, the Company’s Estate property contains one
water well which can sustain sufficient volume to meet the needs of
the Winery and to provide auxiliary water to the Estate Vineyard
for new plantings and unusual drought conditions. At the Tualatin
Vineyard, the Company has water rights to a year-round spring that
feeds an irrigation pond. Additionally, the Company has water
rights at the Pambrun and Rocks Vineyards.
Susceptibility of vineyards to disease
– The Tualatin Vineyard and the adjacent leased
vineyards are known to be infested with phylloxera, an aphid-like
insect, which can destroy vines.
It is not possible
to estimate any range of loss that may be incurred due to the
phylloxera infestation of the Company’s vineyards. The
phylloxera at Tualatin Vineyard is believed to have been introduced
on the roots of the vines first planted on the property in the
southern most section Gewurztraminer in 1971 that the Company
partially removed in 2004. The remaining vines, and all others
infested, remain productive at low crop levels. The Company is in
the process of gradually replacing infested areas with new,
phylloxera-resistant vines.
Winery
Wine production facility – The
Company’s Winery and production facilities are capable of
efficiently producing up to 220,000 cases (524,000 gallons) of wine
per year, depending on the type of wine produced. In 2018, the
Winery produced approximately 164,590 cases (391,400 gallons) from
its 2016 and 2017 harvest. The Company expects to produce
approximately 154,500 cases (367,400 gallons) in 2019 from its 2017
and 2018 harvests.
The Winery is
12,784 square feet in size and contains areas for processing,
fermenting, aging and bottling wine, as well as an underground wine
cellar, and administrative offices. There is a 12,500 square foot
outside production area for harvesting, pressing and fermenting
wine grapes, and a 4,500 square foot insulated storage facility
with a capacity of approximately 30,000 cases of wine. The Company
also has a 23,000 square foot storage building to store its
inventory of bottled product with a capacity of approximately
135,000 cases of wine. The production area is equipped with a
settling tank and sprinkler system for disposing of wastewater from
the production process in compliance with environmental
regulations.
In addition to the
production capacity discussed above, the Tualatin Winery has 20,000
square feet of production capacity. This adds approximately 28,000
cases (66,000 gallons) of wine production capacity to the Company.
The capacity at the Tualatin Winery is available to the Company to
meet any anticipated future production needs. In 2008, the Company
replaced the roof and production floor, insulation and walls, in
anticipation of using it for wine storage and future
production.
10
Hospitality facility – The
Company has a renovated tasting and hospitality facility of 35,642
square feet (the “Hospitality Center”) at the Estate
Winery. The main floor of the Hospitality Center includes retail
sales space with the Estate Tasting Room, Club Room for Wine Club
Members, dining area and mezzanine, which altogether are designed
to accommodate approximately 300 persons for tastings, wine and
food pairing meals, public and private events and meetings. An
iconic observation tower and tiered decks around the Hospitality
Center enable visitors to enjoy the view of the Willamette Valley
and the Company’s Estate Vineyard. The tiered decks funnel
into an outdoor courtyard that hosts many seasonal gatherings. To
the south side of the tiered decks the Company has two hospitality
suites for overnight accommodations. The Hospitality Center sits
above the underground barrel cellar and tunnel that connects with
the Winery. The facility includes a basement cellar, tunnel and
barrel room of 11,090 square feet to store up to 1,800 barrels of
wine for aging in the proper environment.
Just outside the
Hospitality Center, the Company has a landscaped park setting
consisting of terraced lawns for outdoor events. The area between
the Winery and Hospitality Center form a 20,000 square foot
quadrangle. As designed, a removable fabric top can cover the
quadrangle, making it an all-weather outdoor facility to promote
the sale of the Company’s wines through festivals and social
events. Above the Company’s working Winery houses the Pinot
Room and Founders’ Room, which can accommodate 40 persons and
111 persons, respectively, for public and private
events.
The Company
believes the Hospitality Center and surrounding areas make the
Winery an attractive recreational and social destination for
tourists and residents, thereby enhancing the Company’s
ability to sell its wines.
Mortgages on properties – The
Company’s winery facilities at the Estate Winery are subject
to two mortgages with an aggregate principal balance of $6,816,928
at December 31, 2018. The two outstanding loans require monthly
principal and interest payments of $62,067 for the life of the
loans, at annual fixed interest rates of 4.75% and 5.21%, and with
maturity dates of 2028 and 2032.
Wine production – The Company
operates on the principle that winemaking is a natural but highly
technical process requiring the attention and dedication of the
winemaking staff. The Company’s Winery is equipped with
current technical innovations and uses modern laboratory equipment
and computers to monitor the progress of each wine through all
stages of the winemaking process.
The Company’s
recent annual grape harvest and wine production is as
follows:
|
|
Tons of
|
|
Tons of
|
|
Total
Tons
|
|
Gallons
of
|
|
|
|
|
Harvest
|
|
Grapes
|
|
Grapes
|
|
of Grapes
|
|
Bulk
|
|
Production
|
|
Cases
|
Year
|
|
Grown
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Harvested
|
|
Purchases
|
|
Year
|
|
Produced
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
1,107
|
|
25
|
|
1,132
|
|
-
|
|
2005
|
|
72,297
|
2006
|
|
1,454
|
|
34
|
|
1,488
|
|
-
|
|
2006
|
|
81,081
|
2007
|
|
850
|
|
896
|
|
1,746
|
|
-
|
|
2007
|
|
115,466
|
2008
|
|
551
|
|
874
|
|
1,425
|
|
57,736
|
|
2008
|
|
121,027
|
2009
|
|
1,033
|
|
1,100
|
|
2,133
|
|
74,954
|
|
2009
|
|
132,072
|
2010
|
|
674
|
|
371
|
|
1,045
|
|
4,276
|
|
2010
|
|
110,224
|
2011
|
|
718
|
|
609
|
|
1,327
|
|
9,620
|
|
2011
|
|
81,357
|
2012
|
|
658
|
|
670
|
|
1,328
|
|
7,910
|
|
2012
|
|
91,181
|
2013
|
|
755
|
|
1,020
|
|
1,775
|
|
6,257
|
|
2013
|
|
95,638
|
2014
|
|
1,211
|
|
970
|
|
2,181
|
|
520
|
|
2014
|
|
108,958
|
2015
|
|
1,266
|
|
1,012
|
|
2,278
|
|
-
|
|
2015
|
|
120,794
|
2016
|
|
921
|
|
1,052
|
|
1,973
|
|
47,780
|
|
2016
|
|
141,416
|
2017
|
|
1,631
|
|
1,622
|
|
3,253
|
|
15,900
|
|
2017
|
|
151,332
|
2018
|
|
1,501
|
|
485
|
|
1,986
|
|
800
|
|
2018
|
|
164,590
|
Cases produced per
ton harvested often vary between years mainly due to the timing of
when the cases are produced.
11
Sales and Distribution
Marketing strategy – The Company
markets and sells its wines through a combination of direct sales
at the Winery, directly through mailing lists, and through
distributors and wine brokers. As the Company has increased
production volumes and achieved greater brand recognition, sales to
out of state markets have increased, both in terms of absolute
dollars and as a percentage of total Company sales.
The Company uses a
variety of marketing channels to generate interest in its wines.
The Company has a highly functional website and maintains social
media sites. The Company controls a database of customers for email
and direct promotions. The Company continues to submit its wines to
competitions and state, regional and national media for editorials
and ratings.
Direct sales – The
Company’s Estate Winery is located on a visible hill adjacent
to Oregon’s major north-south freeway (Interstate 5),
approximately 2 miles south of the state’s second-largest
metropolitan area (Salem), and 50 miles in either direction from
the state’s first and third-largest metropolitan areas
(Portland and Eugene). We believe the unique location along
Interstate 5 has resulted in generally greater amount of wines sold
at the Estate Winery as compared to the Oregon industry standard.
Direct sales from the Winery are a vital and growing sales channel
and an effective means of product promotion. The Estate Winery
Tasting Room is open daily and offers wine tasting and education by
trained personnel. The Company offers a complimentary daily tour
along with by-appointment private tours offering a
behind-the-scenes look at the production process of the wines. The
Company has the largest wine club membership in Oregon and features
a Members-only Club Room at the Estate Winery.
In 2014, the Company launched “Pairings,” a focused
restaurant offering a wine and food pairing lunch. Led by the
Winery chef, the menu highlights Pacific Northwest inspired dishes
paired with the Company’s wines. The culinary offering has
now expanded to include “Pairings Wine Dinners,”
community-style wine dinners hosted regularly throughout each
month.
The Winery has
developed a Winery Ambassador program, which connects its
“Ambassadors” with customers throughout the United
States and offers personalized wine recommendations and easy
ordering by phone or email.
The Company also
operates three additional tasting rooms; one in historic downtown
McMinnville, in the heart of Oregon Wine Country, one in downtown
Walla Walla, Washington and at its Tualatin Vineyard (located 30
minutes west of Portland).
The Company holds
six major festivals at the Winery each year. In addition, open
houses are held at the Winery during major holiday weekends such as
Memorial Day and Thanksgiving. Numerous private events, charitable
and political events are also held at the Winery.
Direct sales
produce a higher profit margin because the Company can sell its
wine directly to consumers at retail prices rather than to
distributors at free-on-board or “FOB” prices. Sales
made directly to consumers at retail prices result in an increased
profit margin equal to the difference between retail prices and
distributor prices. For 2018 and 2017, direct sales contributed
approximately 39.5% and 40.0% of the Company’s net sales,
respectively.
Distributors and wine brokers –
The Company uses both independent distributors and wine brokers
primarily to market the Company’s wines in specific targeted
areas. Only those distributors and wine brokers who have
demonstrated knowledge of and a proven ability to market premium,
super premium, and ultra-premium wines are utilized. The
Company’s products are distributed in 49 states and the
District of Columbia, and there are 3 non-domestic (export)
customers. For 2018 and 2017, sales to distributors and wine
brokers contributed approximately 60.5% and 60.0% of the
Company’s revenue from operations, respectively.
Tourists – Oregon wineries are a
popular tourist destination with many bed & breakfasts, motels
and fine dining restaurants available. The Willamette Valley,
Oregon’s leading wine region has approximately 69% of the
state’s wineries and vineyards, is home to approximately 564
wineries and was selected by Wine Enthusiast Magazine as its 2016
Wine Region of the Year. An additional advantage for Willamette
Valley wine tourism is the proximity of the wineries to Portland
(Oregon’s largest city and most popular destination). From
Portland, tourists can visit the Willamette Valley winery of their
choice in anywhere from a 45 minute to a two-hour
drive.
12
The Company believes its convenient location, adjacent to
Interstate 5, enables the Winery to attract a significant number of
visitors. The Winery is approximately a 45-minute drive from
Portland and less than one mile from The Enchanted Forest, an
amusement park which operates from April through September each
year.
Dependence on Major
Customers
Historically, the
Company’s revenue has been derived from thousands of
customers annually. In 2018, sales to one distributor represented
approximately 21.0% of total Company revenue. In 2017, sales to one
distributor represented approximately 18.2% of total Company
revenue.
Research and Development
The nature of the
Company’s business does not require the Company to incur a
material amount of research and development expense.
Competition
The wine industry
is highly competitive. In a broad sense, wines may be considered to
compete with all alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages. Within the
wine industry, the Company believes that its principal competitors
include wineries in Oregon, California and Washington, which, like
the Company, produce premium, super premium, and ultra-premium
wines. Wine production in the United States is dominated by large
California wineries that have significantly greater financial,
production, distribution and marketing resources than the Company.
Currently, no Oregon winery dominates the Oregon wine market.
Several Oregon wineries, however, are older and better established
and have greater label recognition than that of the
Company.
The Company
believes that the principal competitive factors in the premium,
super premium, and ultra-premium segment of the wine industry are
product quality, price, label recognition, and product supply. The
Company believes it competes favorably with respect to each of
these factors. The Company has primarily received
“Excellent” to “Recommended” reviews in
tastings of its wines and believes its prices are competitive with
other Oregon wineries. Larger scale production is necessary to
satisfy retailers’ and restaurants’ demand and the
Company believes that additional production capacity will be needed
to meet estimated future demand. Furthermore, the Company believes
that its estimated aggregate production capacity of 590,000 gallons
(248,000 cases) per year at its Estate Vineyards and Tualatin
Vineyard locations give it significant competitive advantages over
most Oregon wineries in areas such as marketing, distribution
arrangements, grape purchasing, and access to financing. The
current production level of most Oregon wineries is generally much
smaller than the estimated production capacity level of the
Company’s Wineries. With respect to label recognition, the
Company believes that its unique structure as a publicly owned
company will give it a significant advantage in gaining market
share in Oregon, as well as penetrating other wine
markets.
Governmental Regulation of the Wine
Industry
The production and
sale of wine is subject to extensive regulation by the U.S.
Department of the Treasury, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau and the Oregon Liquor Control Commission. The Company is
licensed by and meets the bonding requirements of each of these
governmental agencies. Sale of the Company’s wine is subject
to federal alcohol tax, payable at the time wine is removed from
the bonded area of the Winery for shipment to customers or for sale
in its tasting room.
In December 2017,
the federal government passed comprehensive tax legislation which
included the Craft Beverage Modernization and Tax Reform Act. This
legislation modified federal alcohol tax rates by expanding the
lower $1.07 per gallon tax rate to wines up to 16.0% alcohol
content with wines containing higher alcohol levels being taxed at
$1.57 per gallon. Additionally, the legislation provides for a $1
credit per gallon for the first 30,000 gallons produced; $0.90 for
the next 100,000 gallons; and then $0.535 for up to 750,000
gallons. These modifications were effective January 2018 and are
effective for two years.
13
The Company also
pays the state of Oregon an excise tax of $0.67 per gallon for
wines with alcohol content at or below 14.0% and $0.77 per gallon
for wines with alcohol content above 14.0% on all wine sold in
Oregon. In addition, most states in which the Company’s wines
are sold impose varying excise taxes on the sale of alcoholic
beverages. As an agricultural processor, the Company is also
regulated by the Oregon Department of Agriculture and, as a
producer of wastewater, by the Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality. The Company has secured all necessary permits to operate
its business.
Prompted by growing
government budget shortfalls and public reaction against alcohol
abuse, government entities often consider legislation that could
potentially affect the taxation of alcoholic beverages. Excise tax
rates being considered are often substantial. The ultimate effects
of such legislation, if passed, cannot be assessed accurately. Any
increase in the taxes imposed on table wines can be expected to
have a potentially adverse impact on overall sales of such
products. However, the impact may not be proportionate to that
experienced by producers of other alcoholic beverages and may not
be the same in every state.
Costs and Effects of Compliance with Local,
State and Federal Environmental Laws
The Company
management is strongly focused on environmental stewardship and
maintains a variety of policies and processes designed to protect
the environment, the public and consumers of its wine. Although
much of the Company’s expenses for protecting the environment
are voluntary, the Company is regulated by various local, state and
federal agencies regarding environmental laws. However, these
regulatory costs and processes are effectively integrated into the
Company’s regular operations and consequently do not
generally cause significant alternative processes or
costs.
Employees
As of December 31,
2018, the Company had approximately 135 full-time employees and 90
part-time or seasonal employees. In addition, the Company hires
additional employees for seasonal work as required. The
Company’s employees are not represented by any collective
bargaining unit. The Company believes it maintains positive
relations with its employees.
Additional Information
The Company files
Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on Form 8-K, and proxy statements with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The public
may read and copy any materials that the Company files with the SEC
free of charge at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F
Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet
site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and
other information regarding issuers, including the Company, that
file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. You may learn more
about the Company by visiting the Company’s website at
www.wvv.com. All
websites referred to herein are inactive textual references only,
meaning that the information contained in such websites is not
incorporated by reference herein.
The following
disclosures should be read in conjunction with Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These disclosures
are intended to discuss certain material risks of the
Company’s business as they appear to Management at this time.
However, this list is not exhaustive. Other risks may, and likely
will, arise from time to time.
Agricultural risks could adversely affect the
Company
Winemaking and
grape growing are subject to a variety of agricultural risks.
Various diseases, pests, fungi, viruses, including Grapevine Red
Blotch Disease (GRBV), drought, frost and certain other weather
conditions can affect the quantity of grapes available to the
Company, decreasing the supply of the Company’s products and
negatively impacting profitability. In particular, certain of the
Company’s vines are not resistant to phylloxera; accordingly,
those vines are particularly at risk to the effects from an
infestation of phylloxera. Phylloxera is a pest that attacks the
rootstocks of wine grape plants. Vineyards in the United States,
including some in Oregon and some owned by us, have been infested
in recent years with phylloxera. In particular, Tualatin Estate
Vineyards have phylloxera. There can be no assurance that the
Company’s existing vineyards, or the rootstocks the Company
is now using in its planting programs, will not become susceptible
to current or new strains of phylloxera or that the phylloxera
present at the Tualatin Vineyards will not spread to our other
vineyards. Pierce’s Disease is a vine bacterial disease. It
kills grapevines and there is no known cure. Small insects called
Sharpshooters spread this disease. A new strain of the Sharpshooter
was discovered in Southern California and is believed to be
migrating north. The Company is actively supporting the efforts of
the agricultural industry to control this pest and is making every
reasonable effort to prevent an infestation in its own vineyards.
The Company cannot, however, guarantee that it will succeed in
preventing contamination in its vineyards. Additionally, any future
government restrictions created in connection with government
attempts to combat phylloxera, GRBV or other pests or viruses may
increase vineyard costs and/or reduce production.
14
Our operations are susceptible to changing
weather patterns and other environmental
factors
Over the past
several years, changing weather patterns and climatic conditions
have added to the unpredictability and frequency of natural
disasters, such as hail storms, wildfires and wind, snow and ice
storms. Any such extreme weather condition could negatively impact
the harvest of grapes at our vineyards and/or the other vineyards
that supply us with grapes for our wine. In particular,
Oregon’s Willamette Valley has an unpredictable rainfall
pattern in particularly in early autumn. If significantly
above-average rains occur just prior to the autumn grape harvest,
the quality of harvested grapes is often materially diminished,
thereby affecting that year’s wine quality.
Additionally,
long-term changes in weather patterns could adversely affect the
Company, especially if such changes impacted the amount or quality
of grapes harvested. We cannot anticipate changes in weather
patterns/conditions, and we cannot predict their impact on our
operations if they were to occur.
As weather patterns
evolve, the Company’s vineyards, and contracted vineyards,
have become susceptible to potential smoke damage as a result of
wildfires within the region. In extreme events, smoke can produce
effects on grapes that make them unusable in the production of
wine. The Company can not predict smoke events or their potential
impact were they to occur.
We may not be able to economically insure
certain risks
The Company
maintains insurance policies to cover certain risks. However not
all risks can be insured, or insured economically, and there may be
gaps in coverage that could expose the Company to liability should
an event occur. Additionally, we can not be certain that coverage
levels are adequate or that all of our insurers will be financially
viable if we make a claim.
Loss of key employees could harm the
Company’s reputation and business
The Company’s
success depends to some degree upon the continued service of a
number of key employees. The loss of the services of one or more of
these key employees, including James W. Bernau, our President and
Chief Executive Officer, Richard F. Goward Jr., our Chief Financial
Officer and Christine Clair, our Winery Director could harm the
Company and its reputation and negatively impact its profitability,
particularly if one or more of the Company’s key employees
resigns to join a competitor or to form a competing
company.
The Company’s ability to operate
requires utilization of the line of credit
The Company’s
cash flow from operations historically has not been sufficient to
provide all funds necessary for the Company’s operations. The
Company has entered into a line of credit agreement to provide such
funds and entered into term loan arrangements, the proceeds of
which were used to acquire the Tualatin Winery and the Tualatin
Vineyards, construct and remodel the Hospitality Center and pay
down the Company’s revolving line of credit. There is no
assurance that the Company will be able to comply with all
conditions under its credit facilities in the future or that the
amount available under its line of credit facility will be adequate
for the Company’s future needs. Failure to comply with all
conditions of the credit facilities, or to have sufficient funds
for operations could adversely affect the Company’s results
of operations and shareholder value.
As of December 31,
2018, the Company’s outstanding long-term debt was
approximately $6.8 million but did not have any outstanding
borrowings under its $2.0 million line of credit. Additionally, the
Company had notes payable to private parties of approximately $1.7
million as of December 31, 2018.
15
Costs of being a publicly-held company may put
the Company at a competitive disadvantage
As a public
company, the Company incurs substantial costs that are not incurred
by its competitors that are privately-held. These compliance costs
may result in the Company’s wines being more expensive than
those produced by its competitors and/or may reduce profitability
compared to such competitors.
The Company faces significant competition
which could adversely affect profitability
The wine industry
is intensely competitive and highly fragmented. The Company’s
wines compete in several premium wine market segments with many
other premium domestic and foreign wines, with imported wines
coming from the Burgundy and Bordeaux regions of France, as well as
Italy, Chile, Argentina, South Africa, New Zealand and Australia.
The Company’s wines also compete with popular priced generic
wines and with other alcoholic and, to a lesser degree,
non-alcoholic beverages, for shelf space in retail stores and for
marketing focus by the Company’s independent distributors,
many of which carry extensive brand portfolios. A result of this
intense competition has been and may continue to be upward pressure
on the Company’s selling and promotional expenses. In
addition, the wine industry has experienced significant
consolidation. Many of the Company’s competitors have greater
financial, technical, marketing and public relations resources than
the Company does. In particular, wine production in the United
States is dominated by large California wineries that have
significantly greater resources than the Company. Additionally,
greater worldwide label recognition and larger production levels
give many of the Company’s competitors certain unit cost
advantages. Company sales may be harmed to the extent it is not
able to compete successfully against such wine or alternative
beverage producers’ costs. There can be no assurance that in
the future the Company will be able to successfully compete with
its current competitors or that it will not face greater
competition from other wineries and beverage
manufacturers.
The Willamette Valley American Viticultural
Area (“AVA”) value may be eroded by out of state
competition who use it inappropriately or as fanciful
marketing.
Wine grape growing
regions in the United States are divided into American Viticultural
Areas (AVAs) by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(“TTB”), of the United States Department of the
Treasury, based on distinguishable geographic features. The Oregon
wine industry has historically embraced higher standards for wine
production than those established by the federal government and
other states. As a result, wines from Oregon AVA’s, and
specifically the Willamette Valley AVA, have achieved recognition
for their quality against other wines in their class. As a result,
these wines are often sold at a higher price point than wines not
produced in Oregon. Because of this recognition, out of state
competitors have used Oregon AVAs on bottles and packaging claiming
its use as fanciful marketing. Such use, inappropriate or
otherwise, could have a dilutive effect on the prestige of Oregon
AVAs and ultimately the prices that can be charged for wines from
Oregon AVAs as a result of reduced competitor quality and/or
pricing.
The Company competes for shelf space in retail
stores and for marketing focus by its independent distributors,
most of whom carry extensive product portfolios
Nationwide, the
Company sells its products primarily through independent
distributors and brokers for resale to retail outlets, restaurants,
hotels and private clubs across the United States and in some
overseas markets. Sales to distributors are expected to continue to
represent a substantial portion of the Company’s net revenue
in the future. A change in the relationship with any of the
Company’s significant distributors could harm the
Company’s business and reduce Company sales. The laws and
regulations of several states prohibit changes of distributors,
except under certain limited circumstances, making it difficult to
terminate a distributor for poor performance without reasonable
cause, as defined by applicable statutes. Any difficulty or
inability to replace distributors, poor performance of the
Company’s major distributors or the Company’s inability
to collect accounts receivable from its major distributors could
harm the Company’s business. There can be no assurance that
the distributors and retailers the Company uses will continue to
purchase the Company’s products or provide Company products
with adequate levels of promotional support. Consolidation at the
retail tier, among club and chain grocery stores in particular, can
be expected to heighten competitive pressure to increase marketing
and sales spending or constrain or reduce prices.
Loss of the “Willamette” trademark
could adversely affect the Company’s distinction within the
AVA
The Company has
long held the trade mark “Willamette” as used within
the product name. Because the name Willamette is also used as the
AVA name competitors are allowed to reference the Willamette AVA,
if their wine meets Oregon grape sourcing and production standards,
but are precluded from using the name “Willamette” in
the product name itself. This trademark has been challenged and,
should the Company lose this challenge or future challenges, the
Company could lose a competitive advantage within the
region.
16
Fluctuations in quantity and quality of grape
supply could adversely affect the Company
A shortage in the
supply of quality grapes may result from a variety of factors that
determine the quality and quantity of the Company’s grape
supply, including weather conditions, pruning methods, diseases and
pests, the ability to buy grapes on long and short term contracts
and the number of vines producing grapes. Any shortage in the
Company’s grape production could cause a reduction in the
amount of wine the Company is able to produce, which could reduce
sales and adversely impact the Company’s results from
operations. Factors that reduce the quantity of the Company’s
grapes may also reduce their quality, which in turn could reduce
the quality or amount of wine the Company produces. Deterioration
in the quality of the Company’s wines could harm its brand
name and could reduce sales and adversely impact the
Company’s results of operations.
Contamination of the Company’s wines
would harm the Company’s business
The Company is
subject to certain hazards and product liability risks, such as
potential contamination, through tampering or otherwise, of
ingredients or products. Contamination of any of the
Company’s wines could cause it to destroy its wine held in
inventory and could cause the need for a product recall, which
could significantly damage the Company’s reputation for
product quality. The Company maintains insurance against certain of
these kinds of risks, and others, under various insurance policies.
However, the insurance may not be adequate or may not continue to
be available at a price or on terms that are satisfactory to the
Company and this insurance may not be adequate to cover any
resulting liability.
A reduction in consumer demand for premium
wines could harm the Company’s business
There have been
periods in the past in which there were substantial declines in the
overall per capita consumption of beverage alcohol products in the
United States and other markets in which the Company participates.
A limited or general decline in consumption in one or more of the
Company’s product categories could occur in the future due to
a variety of factors, including: a general decline in economic
conditions; increased concern about the health consequences of
consuming alcoholic beverage products and about drinking and
driving; a trend toward a healthier diet including lighter, lower
calorie beverages such as diet soft drinks, juices and water
products; the increased activity of anti-alcohol consumer groups;
and increased federal, state or foreign excise and other taxes on
beverage alcohol products. The competitive position of the
Company’s products could also be affected adversely by any
failure to achieve consistent, reliable quality in the product or
service levels to customers.
Changes in consumer spending could have a
negative impact on the Company’s financial condition and
business results
Wine sales depend
upon a number of factors related to the level of consumer spending,
including the general state of the economy, federal and state
income tax rates, deductibility of business entertainment expenses
under federal and state tax laws, and consumer confidence in future
economic conditions. Changes in consumer spending in these and
other regions can affect both the quantity and the price of wines
that customers are willing to purchase at restaurants or through
retail outlets. Reduced consumer confidence and spending may result
in reduced demand for the Company’s products, limitations on
the Company’s ability to increase prices and increased levels
of selling and promotional expenses. This, in turn, may have a
considerable negative impact upon the Company’s sales and
profit margins.
Increased regulation and/or taxation could
adversely affect the Company
The wine industry
is subject to extensive regulation by the Federal Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (“TTB”) and various
foreign agencies, state liquor authorities, such as the Oregon
Liquor Control Commission (“OLCC”), and local
authorities. These regulations and laws dictate such matters as
licensing requirements, trade and pricing practices, permitted
distribution channels, permitted and required labeling, and
advertising and relations with wholesalers and retailers. Any
expansion of the Company’s existing facilities or development
of new vineyards or wineries may be limited by present and future
zoning ordinances, environmental restrictions and other legal
requirements. In addition, new regulations or requirements or
increases in excise taxes, income taxes, property and sales taxes
or international tariffs, could negatively affect the
Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
Recently, many states have considered proposals to increase, and
some of these states have increased, state alcohol excise taxes.
Additionally, many states have revised, or are revising, statutes
that broaden the definition of nexus to increase tax revenue from
out of state businesses.
17
On December 22,
2017, the President signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
(Public Law 115-97), which makes extensive changes to the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (IRC), including income tax rates and
provisions related to alcohol that are administered by TTB. Those
changes were effective January 1, 2018 and are applicable to any
wine removed or imported during calendar years 2018 and 2019. The
impact of the changes on the Company was a reduction in the Federal
excise taxes imposed on wines with an alcohol volume between
14-16%, which are now taxed at $1.07 per gallon compared to the
prior tax rate in 2017 of $1.57. The tax law also allows for
certain volume production credits that the Company may be eligible
to take which further decreases the Company’s excise tax
liability. If the alcohol excise tax provisions contained in the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are not extended beyond December 31, 2019,
the tax rates and credits will revert to where they were before the
bill was signed into law thus increasing the Company’s excise
tax liability.
New or revised
regulations, or increased licensing fees, requirements or taxes
could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
financial condition or results of operations. There can be no
assurance that new or revised regulations, taxes or increased
licensing fees and requirements will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s business and its results of
operations and its cash flows.
The Company’s common stock is thinly
traded, and therefore not as liquid as other
investments.
The trading volume
of the Company’s common stock on NASDAQ is consistently
“thin,” in that there is not a great deal of trading
activity on a daily basis. Because the average active trading
volume is thin, there is less opportunity for shareholders to sell
their shares of the Company’s common stock on the open
market, resulting in the common stock being less liquid than common
stock in other publicly traded companies.
The Company may face liabilities
associated with the offer and sale of our preferred
stock.
In August 2015, the Company commenced a public offering of our
Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock pursuant to a registration
statement filed with the SEC. The Company registered this
transaction with the securities authorities of the States of Oregon
and Washington and, in November 2015, achieved listing status on
NASDAQ under the trading symbol WVVIP. The terms of our Series A
Redeemable Preferred Stock are unusual for a company of our size,
and we believe the structure of these securities and of the
offering are not commonplace among issuers of any type. Federal and
state securities laws impose significant liabilities on issuers of
securities if the related offering documents contain material
misstatements of fact, or if the documents omit to state facts
necessary, in light of the circumstances as a whole, to prevent the
documents from being misleading. These liabilities can include
rescission liability to the purchasers of the securities, as well
as potential enforcement liability that could give rise to civil
money penalties. Securities litigation can be extraordinarily
expensive and protracted, and if we are accused of misstatements or
omissions in our offering documents, we may face economic harms and
management distractions regardless of the ultimate outcome of any
such litigation. Further, if we ultimately are adjudged to have
actually made a material misstatement or omission, the Company may
be liable for the repayment of the purchase price of the related
securities, plus interest from the date of purchase. Any one or
more of these events or circumstances would have a material adverse
impact upon our business, financial condition or results of
operations, and may make it more difficult or more expensive to
undertake capital-raising efforts in the
future.
The Company may be unable to pay accumulated
dividends on its Series A Redeemable Preferred
Stock.
The Company’s
Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock bears a cumulative 5.3%
dividend based upon the original issue price, or $0.22 per share
per annum. However, prior to the declaration and payment of
dividends our board of directors must determine, among other
things, that funds are available out of the surplus of the Company
and that the payment would not render us insolvent or compromise
our ability to pay our obligations as they come due in the ordinary
course of business. Additionally, our existing credit facility
limits, and future debt obligations in the future may limit, both
our legal and our practical ability to declare and pay dividends.
As a result, although the Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock will
continue to earn a right to receive dividends, the Company’s
ability to pay dividends will depend, among other things, upon our
ability to generate excess cash. However, although shares of our
Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock will earn cumulative dividends,
unpaid dividends will not, themselves, accumulate (as might
compounding interest on a debt security, for example).
18
The issuance of additional shares of our
preferred stock or common stock in the future could adversely
affect holders of common stock.
The market price of
our common stock may be influenced by any preferred stock we may
issue. Our board of directors is authorized to issue additional
classes or series of preferred stock without any action on the part
of our stockholders. This includes the power to set the terms of
any such classes or series of preferred stock that may be issued,
including voting rights, dividend rights and preferences over
common stock with respect to the liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of the business and other terms. If we issue preferred
stock in the future that has preference over our common stock with
respect to liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or if we issue
preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting power of
our common stock, the rights of holders of the common stock or the
market price of the common stock could be adversely
affected.
Failures or security breaches of our
information technology systems could disrupt our operations and
negatively impact our business.
We use information
technologies to manage our operations and various business
functions. We rely on various technologies to process, store and
report on our business and to communicate electronically between
our facilities, personnel, customers and suppliers as well as for
administrative functions and many of such technology systems are
independent on one another for their functionality. We also use
information technologies to process financial information and
results of operations for internal reporting purposes and to comply
with regulatory, legal and tax requirements. We rely on third party
providers for some of these information technologies and support.
Our ability to effectively manage our business and coordinate the
production, distribution and sale of our products is highly
dependent on our technology systems. Despite our security design
and controls and other operational safeguards, and those of our
third party providers, our information technology systems may be
vulnerable to a variety of interruptions, including during the
process of upgrading or replacing hardware, software, databases or
components thereof, natural disasters, terrorist attacks,
telecommunications failures, computer viruses, cyber-attacks,
hackers, unauthorized access attempts and other security issues or
may be breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other
disruptions. Any such interruption or breach could result in
operational disruptions or the misappropriation of sensitive data
that could subject us to civil and criminal penalties, litigation
or have a negative impact on our reputation. There can be no
assurance that such disruptions or misappropriations and the
resulting repercussions will not negatively impact our cash flows
and materially affect our results of operations or financial
condition.
In addition, many
of our information technology systems, such as those we use for
administrative functions, including human resources, payroll,
accounting and internal and external communications, as well as the
information technology systems of our third-party business partners
and service providers, whether cloud-based or hosted in proprietary
servers, contain personal, financial or other information that is
entrusted to us by our customers and personnel. Many of our
information technology systems also contain proprietary and other
confidential information related to our business, such as business
plans and research and development initiatives. To the extent we or
a third party were to experience a material breach of our or such
third party’s information technology systems that result in
the unauthorized access, theft, use, destruction or other
compromises of our customers’ or personnel’s data or
confidential information stored in such systems, including through
cyber-attacks or other external or internal methods could result in
a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, and subject us to
litigation and governmental investigations and proceedings, any of
which could result in our exposure to material
liability.
The provisions in our articles of
incorporation, our by-laws and Oregon law could delay or deter
tender offers or takeover attempts that may offer a premium for our
common stock.
Certain provisions
in our articles of incorporation, our by-laws and Oregon law could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us,
even if that transaction could be beneficial to stockholders. These
impediments include, but are not limited to; the classification of
our Board of Directors (the “Board”) into three classes
serving staggered three-year terms, which makes it more difficult
to quickly replace Board members; the ability of our Board, subject
to certain limitations under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market,
to issue shares of preferred stock with rights as it deems
appropriate without stockholder approval; a provision that special
meetings of our Board may be called only by our chief executive
officer or at the request of holders of not less than half of all
outstanding shares of our common stock; a provision that any member
of the Board, or the entire Board, may be removed from office only
for cause; and a provision that our stockholders comply with
advance-notice provisions to bring director nominations or other
matters before meetings of our stockholders. The Board may
implement other changes that further limit the potential for tender
offers or takeover attempts.
19
None.
Vineyards – The Company owns or
leases 914 acres of land, of which 599 acres is owned and 315 acres
leased. Of the 914 acres of land owned or leased, 370 acres are
productive vineyards, 339 acres are pre-productive vineyards or are
suitable for future vineyard plantings, and 205 acres are not
suitable for vineyard planting or are used or reserved for winery
or hospitality purposes. See Item 1 Business - Vineyards, of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the locations of each of the
Company’s vineyards (both owned and leased) and other
information pertaining to the production capacity, harvest totals
and other important characteristics of each such
vineyard.
Wine production facility – We
believe the Company’s Estate Winery and production facilities
are capable of efficiently producing up to 220,000 cases (524,000
gallons) of wine per year, depending on the type of wine produced.
In 2018, the Winery produced approximately 164,590 cases (391,400
gallons) from its 2016 and 2017 harvest. The Winery is 12,784
square feet in size and contains areas for processing, fermenting,
aging and bottling wine, as well as an underground wine cellar,
meeting rooms, and administrative offices. There is a 12,500 square
foot outside production area for harvesting, pressing and
fermenting wine grapes, and a 4,500 square foot insulated storage
facility with a capacity of 30,000 cases of wine. The Company also
has a 23,000 square foot storage building to store its inventory of
bottled product. The production area is equipped with a settling
tank and sprinkler system for disposing of wastewater from the
production process in compliance with environmental regulations.
The Hospitality Center located as the Company’s Estate Winery
is a large 35,642 square foot tasting and hospitality facility.
The
Hospitality Center sits above the underground barrel cellar and
tunnel that connects with the Winery. The
facility includes a basement cellar, tunnel and barrel room of
11,090 square feet used to store up to 1,800 barrels of wine for
aging in the proper environment.
The
Company owned Tualatin Estate Winery has 20,000 square feet
of production capacity. This adds approximately 28,000 cases
(66,000 gallons) of wine production capacity to the Company. The
production capacity at the Tualatin Estate Winery is not currently
used but is available to the Company to meet future production
needs. The storage capacity at the Tualatin Estate Winery is
periodically used to store excess bulk wine. Additionally, the
Company operates a small retail store and tasting room at the
Tualatin Estate Winery.
The Company carries
Property and Liability insurance coverage in amounts deemed
adequate by Management.
See additional
discussion of vineyard and wine production facility under Item 1.
Business.
Although the
Company from time to time may be involved with disputes, claims and
litigation related to the conduct of its business, there are no
material legal proceedings pending to which the Company is a party
or to which any of its property is subject, and the Company’s
management does not know of any such action being
contemplated.
Not
applicable.
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
Market Information
The Company’s
common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the
symbol “WVVI.”
20
The following table
below sets forth for the quarters indicated the high and low sales
prices for the Company’s common stock as reported on the
NASDAQ Capital Market:
Quarters ended
2018
|
|
12/31/2018
|
|
|
9/30/2018
|
|
|
6/30/2018
|
|
|
3/31/2018
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
High
|
|
$
|
7.97
|
|
|
$
|
8.55
|
|
|
$
|
8.55
|
|
|
$
|
8.37
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
6.66
|
|
|
$
|
7.88
|
|
|
$
|
7.85
|
|
|
$
|
7.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended
2017
|
|
12/31/2017
|
|
|
9/30/2017
|
|
|
6/30/2017
|
|
|
3/31/2017
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
High
|
|
$
|
8.86
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
|
$
|
8.23
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
7.86
|
|
|
$
|
7.81
|
|
|
$
|
7.62
|
|
|
$
|
7.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holders
As of March 21,
2019, the Company had approximately 2,227 common stock shareholders
of record. As some of our shares of common stock are held in
“street name” by brokers on behalf of shareholders, we
are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial holders of
our common stock represented by these record holders.
Dividends
The Company has not
paid any dividends on its Common Stock, and the Company does not
anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. The
Company intends to use its earnings to expand its vineyards,
winemaking and customer service facilities.
The Company has
paid a prorated annual dividend on its Preferred Stock. On December
30, 2018 the Company paid $.22 per share to Preferred Stock
shareholders of record as of December 7, 2018. Shares issued by the
Company after January 1, 2018 received a prorated dividend based
upon their original issue date. The Company offers a program that
allows Preferred Stock shareholders to use their dividends as
credits for wine purchases at additional discounts. Total dividends
paid, in cash and wine credits, were $1,018,915 and the payment
satisfied all accrued dividend liabilities through December 31,
2018. The Company anticipates paying Preferred Stock dividends
annually in December of each year.
Equity Compensation Plans
The Company had no
equity compensation plan pursuant to which equity awards could be
granted and no outstanding options or other equity awards as of
December 31, 2018.
Recent Sales of Unregistered
Securities
None.
Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
None.
Not
required.
The following
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the
Company’s financial statements and related notes. Some
statements and information contained in this Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations are not historical facts but are forward-looking
statements. For a discussion of these forward-looking statements,
and of important factors that could cause results to differ
materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this
report, see Item 1 of Part I, “Business –
Forward-Looking Statements.”
21
Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations discusses Willamette Valley Vineyards’ financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. As such, management is required to
make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that are believed
to be reasonable based upon the information available. On an
on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments,
including those related to product returns, bad debts, inventories,
investments, income taxes, financing operations, and contingencies
and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on
historical experience and on various other factors that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Revenue - The Company’s principal
sources of revenue are derived from sales and distribution of wine.
Distributor sales are recognized from wine sales at the time of
shipment and passage of title. The Company’s payment
arrangements with customers provide primarily 30-day terms and, to
a limited extent, 45-day, 60-day or longer terms for some
international customers. Direct sales from items sold through the
Company’s retail locations are recognized at the time of
sale.
The Company pays
depletion allowances to the Company’s distributors based on
their sales to their customers. The Company sets these allowances
on a monthly basis and the Company’s distributors bill them
back on a monthly basis. All depletion expenses associated with a
given month are recognized in that month as a reduction of
revenues. The Company also reimburses for samples used by
distributors up to 1.5% of product sold to the distributors. Sample
expenses are recognized at the time the Company is billed by the
distributor as a selling, general and administrative
expense.
Amounts paid by
customers to the Company for shipping and handling expenses are
included in the net revenue. Expenses incurred for outbound
shipping and handling charges are included in selling, general and
administrative expense.
Inventory - The Company values
inventories at the lower of actual cost to produce the inventory or
net realizable value. The Company regularly reviews inventory
quantities on hand and adjusts its production requirements for the
next twelve months based on estimated forecasts of product demand.
A significant decrease in demand could result in an increase in the
amount of excess inventory quantities on hand. In the future, if
the Company’s inventory cost is determined to be greater than
the net realizable value of the inventory upon sale, the Company
would be required to recognize such excess costs in its cost of
goods sold at the time of such determination. Therefore, although
the Company makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of its
forecasts of future product demand, any significant unanticipated
changes in demand could have a significant impact on the ultimate
selling price and cases sold and, therefore, the carrying value of
the Company’s inventory and its reported operating
results.
Additionally, the
Company regularly evaluates inventory for obsolescence and
marketability and if it determines that the inventory is obsolete,
or no longer suitable for use or marketable, the cost of that
inventory is recognized in its cost of sales at the time of such
determination.
Vineyard Development - The Company
capitalizes internal vineyard development costs prior to the
vineyard land becoming fully productive. These costs consist
primarily of the costs of the vines and expenditures related to
labor and materials to prepare the land and construct vine
trellises. Amortization of such costs as annual crop costs is done
on a straight-line basis for the estimated economic useful life of
the vineyard, which is estimated to be 30 years. The Company
regularly evaluates the recoverability of capitalized costs.
Amortization of vineyard development costs are included in
capitalized crop costs that in turn are included in inventory costs
and ultimately become a component of cost of goods
sold.
Income Taxes – The Company accounts for income taxes using the
asset and liability approach. This requires the recognition of
deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the financial
statement and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at the
applicable tax rates. The Company evaluates deferred tax assets,
and records a valuation allowance against those assets, if
available evidence suggests that some of those assets will not be
realized.
22
The effect of
uncertain tax positions would be recorded in the financial
statements only after determining a more likely than not
probability that the uncertain tax positions would withstand an
examination by tax authorities based on the technical merits of the
position. The tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the
largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely
of being realized upon ultimate settlement. As facts and
circumstances change, management reassesses these probabilities and
would record any changes in the financial statements as
appropriate.
Overview
The Company
generates revenue from the sales of wine to wholesalers and direct
to consumers. The Company is experiencing increased levels of
competition in traditional wholesale to retail grocery distribution
from large California based wineries that are acquiring, producing
and marketing Oregon branded wines. Direct to consumer sales
primarily include sales through the Company’s tasting rooms
and wine club. Direct to consumer sales provide a higher gross
profit to the Company due to prices received being closer to retail
than those prices paid by wholesalers. The Company continues to
emphasize growth in direct to consumer sales through use of the
Hospitality Center and growth in wine club membership. The Company
had 7,508 wine club memberships for the year ended December 31,
2018, a net increase of 458 when compared to 2017. Additionally,
the Company’s preferred stock sales since August 2015 have
resulted in approximately 5,744 preferred stockholders many of
which the Company believes are wine enthusiasts. When considering
joint ownership, we believe these new shareholders represent
approximately 9,000 potential customers of the Company. The Company
also has approximately 8,853 common shareholders which we believe
represent an estimated 13,700 potential customers when considering
joint ownership. Additionally, the Company has made significant
investment in developing alternative wine brands, products, direct
sales methods and venues.
Periodically, the
Company will sell grapes or bulk wine, which primarily consists of
inventory that does not meet Company standards or is in excess to
production targets. However, this activity is not a significant
part of the Company’s activities.
The Company sold
approximately 146,300 and 134,600 cases of produced wine during the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, an increase
of 11,700 cases, or 8.7% in the current year over the prior year.
The increase in case sales was primarily the result of increased
shipments to distributors in 2018 when compared to
2017.
Cost of Sales
includes grape costs, whether purchased or grown at Company
vineyards, crush costs, winemaking and processing costs, bottling,
packaging, warehousing and shipping and handling costs associated
with purchased production materials. For grapes grown at Company
vineyards, costs include farming expenditures and amortization of
vineyard development costs. The Company expects cost of sales to
decrease, as a percentage of net sales, over the next several
years, as higher yield vintages are released.
At December 31,
2018, wine inventory includes approximately 102,700 cases of
bottled wine and 496,200 gallons of bulk wine in various stages of
the aging process. Case wine is expected to be sold over the next
12 to 24 months and generally before the release date of the next
vintage. The winery bottled approximately 164,590 cases during the
year ended December 31, 2018.
Results of Operations
2018 compared to 2017
Net income was
$2,858,580 and $2,993,779, for the years ended December 31, 2018
and 2017, respectively, a decrease of $135,199, or 4.5%, for the
year ended December 31, 2018 over the prior year period. The
primary reason for this decrease was a higher income before taxes
being more than offset an increased income tax
provision.
Net income
applicable to common shareholders was $1,839,665 and $2,289,730,
for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, a
decrease of $450,065, or 19.7%, for the year ended December 31,
2018 over the prior year period. This decrease was primarily driven
by lower net income in addition to an increase in preferred stock
dividends in 2018 compared to 2017, mostly as a result of dividends
paid in 2018 to the outstanding shares of preferred stock issued in
2017.
23
The Company had net
sales of $23,079,739 and $20,853,527 for the years December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively, an increase of $2,226,212 or 10.7%,
for the year ended December 31, 2018 over the prior year period.
The reasons for this increase include increased sales in all
categories; retail sales (8.3%), in-state sales (25.6%),
out-of-state sales (2.5%) and sales of bulk products
(5.0%).
The following table
sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s
revenue, excluding excise taxes, from the Winery’s operations
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 and
2017:
|
|
Twelve months
ended
|
|
|||||
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|||||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Retail sales
|
|
$
|
8,818,483
|
|
|
$
|
8,145,291
|
|
In-state sales
|
|
|
4,918,276
|
|
|
|
3,914,662
|
|
Out-of-state
sales
|
|
|
9,201,200
|
|
|
|
8,975,313
|
|
Bulk wine/miscellaneous
sales
|
|
|
368,046
|
|
|
|
350,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
23,306,005
|
|
|
|
21,385,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less excise taxes
|
|
|
(226,266
|
)
|
|
|
(532,379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, net
|
|
$
|
23,079,739
|
|
|
$
|
20,853,527
|
|
Retail sales for
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $8,818,483 and
$8,145,291, respectively, an increase of $673,192, or 8.3%, for the
year ended December 31, 2018 over the prior year period. This
increase was primarily driven by growth in most major retail
categories as well as the addition of a tasting room in Walla
Walla, Washington in 2018.
Bulk
Wine/miscellaneous sales for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017 were $368,046 and $350,640, respectively, an increase of
$17,406 in 2018 compared to 2017. This increase was primarily the
result of normal fluctuations in production needs when compared to
bulk wine supplies.
In-state sales for
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $4,918,276 and
$3,914,662, respectively, an increase of $1,003,614, or 25.6%, for
the year ended December 31, 2018 over the prior year period.
Management believes this increase is primarily due to increased
visibility of our products in the Oregon market as well as enhanced
sales efforts in 2018.
Out-of-state sales
for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $9,201,200 and
$8,975,313, respectively, an increase of $225,887, or 2.5%.
Management believes this increase is related to increased sales and
promotion efforts in 2018.
The Company pays
alcohol excise taxes to both the OLCC and to the TTB. These taxes
are based on product sales volumes. The Company is liable for the
taxes upon the removal of product from the Company’s
warehouse on a per gallon basis. The Company also pays taxes on the
grape harvest on a per ton basis to the OLCC for the Oregon Wine
Board. The Company’s excise taxes for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $226,266 and $532,379, a decrease
of $306,113, or 57.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 over
the prior year period. This decrease was due primarily to increased
wine sales in 2018 being more than offset by a decrease in the
federal excise tax rate as a result of the Craft Beverage
Modernization and Tax Reform Act passed by Congress in December
2017.
Cost of Sales was
$8,298,240 and $7,971,676 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively, an increase of $326,564, or 4.1%, for the year
ended December 31, 2018 over the prior year period. The increase in
cost of sales can be attributed mainly to higher case sales volume
partially offset by lower product costs, as a result of selling
vintages from higher harvest years, as well as the write off of
inventory in 2017 that did not reoccur in 2018.
24
Gross profit was
$14,781,499 and $12,881,851 for the years ended December 31, 2018
and 2017, respectively, an increase of $1,899,648, or 14.7%, for
the year ended December 31, 2018 over the prior year period. This
increase was generally driven by an increase in sales at a lower
cost of sales percentage.
The gross margin
percentage was 64.0% and 61.8% for the years ended December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively, an increase of 3.6%, for the year
ended December 31, 2018 over the prior year period. This increase
in the gross profit percentage was primarily the result of an
overall increase in per case margins mostly due to the release of
wines from vintages produced from higher grape harvest yields, a
lower federal excise tax burden due to federal tax reform, as well
as the write down of obsolete inventory that occurred in 2017 but
did not reoccur in 2018.
Selling, general
and administrative expenses were $10,598,784 and $9,245,807 for the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, an increase
of $1,352,977, or 14.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 over
the prior year period. This increase was mainly the result of both
increased staffing and other selling expenses, the addition of a
new tasting room in Walla Walla, Washington in 2018 and increased
general and administrative costs associated with efforts to
increase sales and accommodate and develop retail growth and new
operations.
Income from
operations was $4,182,715 and $3,636,044 for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, an increase of $546,671,
or 15.0%, for the year ended December 31, 3018 over the prior year
period. The primary reason for this increase was increased gross
profit partially offset by increased selling expenses and
administrative expense.
Interest income was
$26,591 and $25,257 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively, an increase of $1,334 or 5.3%. The increase in
interest income was not due to a single factor. Interest expense
was $457,689 and $473,608 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively, a decrease of $15,919, or 3.4%, for the year
ended December 31, 2018 over the prior year period. The decrease in
interest expense was mainly due to the decrease in loan
balances.
Other income, net,
was $187,969 and $258,812 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively, a decrease of $70,843, or 27.4%, for the year
ended December 31, 2018 over the prior year period. The decrease in
other income in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily the result of a
decrease in revenue recognized from the amortization of a
distribution agreement due to that agreement completing the
amortization period during 2018.
Provision for
income taxes was $1,081,006 and $452,726 for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, an increase of $628,280,
or 138.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 over the prior year
period. This increase in income taxes in 2018 compared to 2017 were
primarily the result of higher income from operations in 2018 as
well as a reduced income tax provision in 2017 that resulted from
the implementation effects of the “Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act” by the U.S. government in December 2017, that did not
reoccur in 2018. The Company’s effective tax rate was 27.4%
and 13.1% in the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017, respectively. The change in effective tax rate was primarily
the result of the implementation of the “Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act” in 2017 causing that year’s rate to be lower due
to changes in the calculation of tax liabilities as of December 31,
2017.
Income per common
share after preferred dividends was $0.37 and $0.46 for the years
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, a decrease of
$0.09, or 19.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 over the
prior year period. The primary reason for this decrease is a
decrease in net income in 2018 compared to 2017.
The Company had
cash balances of $9,737,467, at December 31, 2018, and $13,776,257
at December 31, 2017. The Company had no outstanding line of credit
balance at December 31, 2018 or 2017.
EBITDA
In 2018, the
Company’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (“EBITDA”) increased 11.5% to $6,063,147
from $5,439,591 in 2017, primarily as a result of a decrease in net
income more than offset by an increase in depreciation and income
tax expense.
25
EBITDA does not
reflect the impact of a number of items that affect our net income,
including financing costs. EBITDA is not a measure of financial
performance under the accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America, referred to as “GAAP”,
and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or
income from operations as a measure of performance, nor as an
alternative to net cash from operating activities as a measure of
liquidity. We use EBITDA as a benchmark measurement of our own
operating results and as a benchmark relative to our competitors.
We consider it to be a meaningful supplement to operating income as
a performance measure primarily because depreciation and
amortization expense are not actual cash costs, and depreciation
expense varies widely from company to company in a manner that we
consider largely independent of the underlying cost efficiency of
our operating facilities.
EBITDA has
significant limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be
considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our
GAAP results as reported. Because of these limitations, EBITDA
should only be considered as a supplemental performance measure and
should not be considered as a measure of liquidity or cash
available to us to invest in the growth of our business. See the
Statement of Cash Flows set out in our consolidated financial
statements included herein.
The following table
provides a reconciliation of net income (the most comparable GAAP
measure) to EBITDA for the periods indicated:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|||||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
Net Income
|
|
$
|
2,858,580
|
|
|
$
|
2,993,779
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense
|
|
|
1,692,463
|
|
|
|
1,544,735
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
457,689
|
|
|
|
473,608
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
(26,591
|
)
|
|
|
(25,257
|
)
|
Income tax
expense
|
|
|
1,081,006
|
|
|
|
452,726
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
6,063,147
|
|
|
$
|
5,439,591
|
|
Sales
Wine case sales for
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and ending inventory
amounts for the year ended December 31, 2018, are shown on the
following table, as well as planned production quantities for the
year ending December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planned
Bottling
|
|
||||
|
|
Cases
Sold
|
|
|
Cases
Sold
|
|
|
Cases
On-Hand
|
|
|
Production
|
|
||||
Varietal/Product
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
(Cases)
2019
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pinot Noir/Estate
|
|
|
13,100
|
|
|
|
13,100
|
|
|
|
15,500
|
|
|
|
14,500
|
|
Pinot Noir/Barrel
Select
|
|
|
13,100
|
|
|
|
9,800
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Pinot Noir/Founders
Reserve
|
|
|
4,900
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
Pinot Noir/Special
Designates
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
|
|
11,400
|
|
|
|
5,800
|
|
Pinot Noir/Whole
Cluster
|
|
|
38,100
|
|
|
|
39,300
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
33,100
|
|
Pinot Gris
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
23,800
|
|
|
|
18,300
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Riesling
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
Chardonnay
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
5,800
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
Table Wine
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
11,400
|
|
|
|
6,100
|
|
|
|
19,800
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
15,400
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
146,300
|
|
|
|
134,600
|
|
|
|
102,700
|
|
|
|
154,500
|
|
Approximately 51%
of the Company’s case sales during 2018 were of the
Company’s flagship varietal, Pinot Noir. Case sales of Pinot
Gris and Riesling follow with approximately 19% and 14% of case
sales each, respectively. The Company sold approximately 146,300
and 134,600 cases of Company-produced wine during the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. This represents an
increase of approximately 11,700 cases, or 8.7% in 2018 compared to
2017. This increase in case sales in 2018 compared to 2017 was
primarily the result of increased shipments through
distributors.
26
The Company has
three primary sales channels: direct-to-consumer sales, in-state
sales to distributors, and out-of-state sales to distributors.
These three sales channels represent 39.4%, 21.1% and 39.5%, of net
sales for the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively. This
compares to 39.7%, 18.3% and 42.0%of net sales for the year ended
December 31, 2017, respectively. Miscellaneous and grape sales are
included in direct-to-consumer sales.
The Company’s
direct-to-consumer sales and national sales to distributors offer
comparable products to customers and utilize similar processes and
share resources for production, selling and distribution.
Direct-to-consumer sales generate a higher gross profit margin than
national sales to distributors due to differentiated pricing
between these segments.
Wine Inventory
The Company had
approximately 102,700 cases of bottled wine on-hand at the end of
2018. Management believes sufficient bulk wine inventory is on-hand
to bottle approximately 154,500 cases of wine in 2019 and that
sufficient stock is on hand to meet current demand levels until the
2019 vintage becomes available.
Production Capacity
Current production
volumes are within the current production capacity constraints of
the Winery when including storage capacity at the Tualatin Winery
and utilization of temporary storage when appropriate. In 2018,
approximately 164,590 cases were produced, and Management
anticipates bottling approximately 154,500 cases in 2019. The
Winery has capacity to store and process about 220,000 cases of
wine per year at the Estate Winery but can expand that capacity by
utilizing storage at the Tualatin Winery as well as temporary
storage. Management continues to invest in new production
technologies intended to increase the efficiency and quality of
wine production. During 2018, the Company did not choose to utilize
the wine production facilities at the Tualatin Winery but did
utilize it for wine storage. The Tualatin Winery has capacity to
produce approximately 28,000 cases of wine. The facility is
maintained in good condition and is occasionally used by other
local wineries. Management intends to fully utilize the production
capacity at the Estate Winery before expanding into the Tualatin
Winery.
Grape Supply
For the 2018 and
2017 vintages, the Company grew approximately 60% and 50% of all
grapes harvested, respectively. The remaining grapes harvested were
purchased from other growers. In 2018 and 2017, 32% and 45% of
grapes harvested were purchased under short-term contracts, and 8%
and 5% of grapes harvested were purchased under long-term
contracts, respectively. The Company considers short-term contracts
to be for single vintage years and long-term contracts to cover
multiple vintage years.
Grapes are
typically harvested and received in October of the vintage year.
Upon receipt, the grapes are weighed, and a quality analysis is
performed to ensure the grapes meet the standards set forth in the
purchase contract. Based on the quantity of qualifying grapes
received, the full amount payable to the grower is recorded to the
grapes payable liability account. Approximately 50% of the grapes
payable amount is due in November of the vintage year. The
remaining amount is due in March of the following year. The grapes
are processed into wine, which is typically bottled and available
for sale between five months and two years from date of
harvest.
The Company
received $191,189 and $1,126,326 worth of grapes from long-term
contracts during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively. The Company received $1,256,444 and $2,047,616 worth
of grapes from short-term contracts during the years ended December
31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The decrease in grape purchases
contracts in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily the result of
purchases made to increase the base stock of bulk wine in 2017 that
did not recur in 2018. Total grapes payable was $1,019,129 and
$1,455,569 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Grapes
payable includes $96,910 and $205,475 of grapes payable from
long-term contracts as of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
27
The Company plans
to address long-term grape supply needs by developing new vineyards
on properties currently owned or secured by lease. The Company has
approximately 158 acres of vineyards that have been planted but are
in the pre-productive stage. We anticipate that these vineyards
will begin producing grapes within the next one to three years. The
Company has approximately 181 acres of land that is suitable for
future vineyard development. Management currently has plans to
plant approximately 15 acres and 25 acres in the years 2019 and
2020, which we anticipate will begin producing grapes in years 2023
and 2024, respectively. Additionally, the Company intends to seek
out opportunities to acquire land for future grape plantings in
order to continue to increase available quantities, maintain
control over farming practices, more effectively manage grape costs
and mitigate uncertainty associated with long-term
contracts.
Wine Quality
Continued awareness
of the Willamette Valley Vineyards brand and the quality of its
wines was enhanced by national and regional media coverage
throughout 2018.
Wine Enthusiast awarded the
Company’s 2017 Whole Cluster Pinot Noir with 91 points and
Editors’ Choice, the 2016 Estate Pinot Noir with 90 points
and the 2017 Whole Cluster Rosé of Pinot Noir with 90 points
and Editors’ choice. They also rated the
Company’s 2016 Tualatin Estate Chardonnay with 91 points
and Editors’ Choice, the 2016 Elton Chardonnay with 90
points, the Elton 2016 Florine Pinot Noir with 92 points, the
2016 O’Brien Pinot Noir with 91 points, the 2016 Bernau Block
Pinot Noir with 90 points and the 2016 Hannah Pinot
Noir with 90 points.
Wine
Enthusiast included the Company in an article
highlighting the increase of sparkling wines being produced in
Oregon and the Company’s plans for the Bernau Estate, which
is intended to be dedicated to biodynamic farming and méthode
champenoise sparkling wines.
Robert
Parker’s Wine
Advocate awarded the Company’s 2016 Estate
Chardonnay with a score of 93 points, the 2016 Estate Pinot Noir
with 92 points, the 2015 Méthode Champenoise Brut with 92
points, the 2016 Vintage 43 Pinot Noir with 91+ points and the
Tualatin Estate Pinot Noir with 90 points.
Wine & Spirits
Magazine rated the Company’s 2016
O’Brien Pinot Noir with 91 points, the 2016 Tualatin
Estate Chardonnay with 92 points, the 2016 Founder’s Reserve
Pinot Noir with 92 points and the 2016 Bernau Block Chardonnay with
90 points. They also named the Company’s 2016 Estate
Chardonnay a “Best Buy” and among the
“Year’s Best US Chardonnay.”
James Suckling awarded the Company’s 2016 O’Brien
Pinot Noir with 93 points, the 2016 Bernau Block Pinot Noir with 93
points, the 2016 Elton Self-Rooted Pinot Noir with 94 points, the
2016 Elton Florine Pinot Noir with 94 points and the 2016 Elton
Chardonnay with 93 points.
The Company was selected as a 2017 Impact Hot Prospect Brand by M.
Shanken Communications, Inc., the parent company
of Wine Spectator. The
criteria for this prestigious award are depletions between 50,000
and 200,000 cases in 2017 and at least 15% growth in 2017 and
consistent growth in 2016 and 2015.
The Company’s 2016 Estate Pinot earned a Gold Medal
and 91 points at the San Francisco International Wine
Competition.
The Company’s 2015 Méthode Champenoise Brut won a
Gold Medal, “Best of Class” Sparkling
Wine and was awarded 92 points at the American
Wine Society Wine Competition.
Sip Northwest
Magazine awarded the Company’s 2015 Méthode
Champenoise Brut with a Double Gold and Best of the
Northwest.
Tastings awarded the
Company’s 2015 Tualatin Estate Pinot Noir with 94 points, the
2015 Elton Pinot Noir with 91 points and the 2015 Méthode
Champenoise Brut with 91 points.
The Company’s Winery Director, Christine Clair, was featured
in a video and quoted in The
Associated Press article titled “Wineries Hedge
Against Climate Change, Move to Cool Climates.” This same
article was syndicated to various news networks and appeared in
such news outlets as ABC
News, The National Post, CBS Chicago, The Oregonian, Oregon Public
Broadcasting and the Statesman Journal, among
others.
28
The Company was announced as a finalist in the
2018 Sunset
Magazine Travel Awards. The awards honor excellence and
innovation in the tourism industry across the 13 Western states,
British Columbia and Alberta.
The Company was named “Best Winery”
in Willamette
Week’s “Best of Portland Readers’
Poll.”
The Company won “Gold” in the following categories for
the 2018 Best of the Mid-Valley Awards based on community votes:
Best Winery, Best Place to Buy Wine, Best Date Night, Best Local
Chef and Best Place to Take Out of Town Guests.
The Company’s Whole Cluster Pinot Noir was highlighted in
a Forbes article
titled, “Why it’s Time to Try Oregon Pinot Noir
Now” and Forbes also
featured the Company’s Elton and Tualatin Estate Vineyards in
another article about the Willamette Valley.
The Company was
named one of the best picks of the Willamette Valley by Gerry Frank
in The
Oregonian.
The Company’s progress on Willamette Wineworks, located
in the new Roundhouse building in the revitalized Historic Folsom
Station of Folsom, California, was highlighted in two articles
in The Folsom
Telegraph.
The Company’s
McMinnville Tasting Room was mentioned in the LA Times article “Detours
worth taking on your next road trip” and in the United
Kingdom’s The
Telegraph.
Oregon Business
Magazine named the Company a 100 Best Fan-Favorite
Destination, based on the amount of positive reviews the Company
received on TripAdvisor, Yelp and Google.
The Company’s Consulting Winemaker and Founder of the
Company’s Tualatin Estate Vineyard, Bill Fuller, was featured
in the cover story of Oregon
Wine Press titled “Pioneering the Willamette
Valley.”
Vacay Network, a
Canadian travel website, featured the Company’s Estate
Tasting Room in the article titled, “6 Wineries to Sip and
Savor in Oregon.”
Seasonality
The Company has
historically experienced and expects to continue to experience
seasonal fluctuations in its revenue and net income. Typically,
first quarter sales are the lowest of any given year, and sales
volumes increase progressively through the fourth quarter mostly
because of consumer buying habits.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
At December 31,
2018, the Company had a working capital balance of $23.2 million
and a current ratio of 5.31:1. The Company had cash balances of
$9,737,467, at December 31, 2018.
Total cash provided
from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 was
$2,302,113, which resulted primarily from cash provided by net
income combined with increased non-cash operating expenses, such as
depreciation, being partially offset by cash used in connection
with increased inventory, increased accounts receivable and
decreased grapes payable.
Total cash used in
investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 was
$5,261,865, which was primarily due to cash used to acquire
property and equipment and to develop vineyards on the
Company’s properties.
Total cash used in
financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2018 was
$1,079,038, which primarily resulted from cash received in
connection with the issuance of Preferred Stock being more than
offset by the repayment of debt and payment of a preferred stock
dividend.
At December 31,
2018, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its
$2,000,000 line of credit. The current line of credit loan
agreement with Umpqua Bank is due to expire in
July 2019.
As of December 31,
2018, the Company had a long-term debt balance of $6,816,928 owed
to NW Farm Credit Services. The debt with NW Farm Credit Services
was used to finance the Hospitality Center and subsequent remodels,
invest in winery equipment to increase the Company’s
winemaking capacity, complete the storage facility, and acquire new
vineyard land for future development. Additionally, the Company had
a long-term debt balance of $23,906 owed to Toyota Credit
Corporation for the purchase of a vehicle.
29
As of December 31,
2018, the Company had an installment note payable of $137,667, due
on March 15, 2019, associated with the purchase of 45 acres of
farmland in the Walla Walla AVA.
As of December 31,
2018, the Company had a callable installment note payable of
$1,547,514, due in quarterly payments of $42,534 through February
2032, associated with the purchase of property in the Dundee Hills
AVA.
The Company
believes that cash flow from operations and funds available under
its existing credit facilities will be sufficient to meet the
Company’s foreseeable short and long-term operating
needs.
The Company’s
contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018 including long-term
debt, note payable, grape payables and commitments for future
payments under non-cancelable lease arrangements are summarized
below:
|
|
Payments Due by
Period
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
1
|
|
|
1 –
3
|
|
|
3 –
5
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
|||||
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
|
$
|
6,840,834
|
|
|
$
|
417,293
|
|
|
$
|
888,416
|
|
|
$
|
969,386
|
|
|
$
|
4,565,739
|
|
Notes
payable
|
|
|
1,685,181
|
|
|
|
216,708
|
|
|
|
172,931
|
|
|
|
194,806
|
|
|
|
1,100,736
|
|
Grape
payables
|
|
|
1,019,129
|
|
|
|
1,019,129
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Operating
leases
|
|
|
4,939,501
|
|
|
|
500,740
|
|
|
|
1,016,974
|
|
|
|
814,480
|
|
|
|
2,607,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual
obligations
|
|
$
|
14,484,645
|
|
|
$
|
2,153,870
|
|
|
$
|
2,078,321
|
|
|
$
|
1,978,672
|
|
|
$
|
8,273,782
|
|
Inflation
The Company’s
management does not believe inflation has had a material impact on
the Company’s revenues or income during 2018 or
2017.
Off Balance Sheet
Arrangements
At December 31,
2018 and 2017, the Company had no off-balance sheet
arrangements.
Not
required.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
PAGE
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36-47
|
30
The Board of
Directors and Shareholders
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.
Opinion on the
Financial Statements
We have audited the
accompanying balance sheets
of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. (the “Company”) as
of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related statements of income,
shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then
ended. In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Basis for
Opinion
These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S.
federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our
audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an
audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of
our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express
no such opinion.
Our audits included
performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement
of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and
performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures
included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts
and disclosures in financial statements. Our audits also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation
of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Moss Adams
LLP
Portland,
Oregon
March 21, 2019
March 21, 2019
We have served as
the Company’s auditor since 2004.
31
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$
|
9,737,467
|
|
|
$
|
13,776,257
|
|
Accounts receivable, net (Note
2)
|
|
|
2,352,890
|
|
|
|
1,760,039
|
|
Inventories (Note
3)
|
|
|
16,247,109
|
|
|
|
14,793,594
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets
|
|
|
219,800
|
|
|
|
108,102
|
|
Income tax
receivable
|
|
|
77,063
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
28,634,329
|
|
|
|
30,437,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
34,836
|
|
|
|
49,153
|
|
Vineyard development costs,
net
|
|
|
7,028,920
|
|
|
|
6,006,250
|
|
Property and equipment, net
(Note 4)
|
|
|
25,784,451
|
|
|
|
23,201,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
61,482,536
|
|
|
$
|
59,695,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
844,820
|
|
|
$
|
993,598
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
911,129
|
|
|
|
871,427
|
|
Investor deposits for
preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
430,305
|
|
Current portion of note
payable
|
|
|
1,685,181
|
|
|
|
1,759,652
|
|
Current portion of long-term
debt
|
|
|
417,293
|
|
|
|
397,251
|
|
Income taxes
payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
125,297
|
|
Current portion of deferred
revenue-distribution agreement
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
95,220
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
517,710
|
|
|
|
306,564
|
|
Grapes payable
|
|
|
1,019,129
|
|
|
|
1,455,569
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
5,395,262
|
|
|
|
6,434,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable, net of current
portion
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
137,667
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current
portion and debt issuance costs
|
|
|
6,251,316
|
|
|
|
6,655,384
|
|
Deferred rent
liability
|
|
|
50,480
|
|
|
|
82,024
|
|
Deferred gain
|
|
|
24,983
|
|
|
|
57,077
|
|
Deferred income
taxes
|
|
|
2,200,227
|
|
|
|
1,587,227
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
13,922,268
|
|
|
|
14,954,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note
12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred stock, no
par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 4,662,768 shares issued
and outstanding, liquidation preference $19,350,487, at December
31, 2018 and 4,427,991 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation
preference $18,375,831, at December 31, 2017,
respectively.
|
|
|
18,319,102
|
|
|
|
17,339,508
|
|
Common stock, no par value,
10,000,000 shares authorized, 4,964,529 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017,
respectively.
|
|
|
8,512,489
|
|
|
|
8,512,489
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
20,728,677
|
|
|
|
18,889,012
|
|
Total shareholders’
equity
|
|
|
47,560,268
|
|
|
|
44,741,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
$
|
61,482,536
|
|
|
$
|
59,695,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of the financial
statements.
32
|
|
Twelve months ended
|
|
|||||
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|||||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SALES, NET
|
|
$
|
23,079,739
|
|
|
$
|
20,853,527
|
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
8,298,240
|
|
|
|
7,971,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
|
|
14,781,499
|
|
|
|
12,881,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and
marketing
|
|
|
6,701,837
|
|
|
|
5,912,977
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
3,896,947
|
|
|
|
3,332,830
|
|
Total operating
expenses
|
|
|
10,598,784
|
|
|
|
9,245,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
4,182,715
|
|
|
|
3,636,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
26,591
|
|
|
|
25,257
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(457,689
|
)
|
|
|
(473,608
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
187,969
|
|
|
|
258,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
3,939,586
|
|
|
|
3,446,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX PROVISION
|
|
|
(1,081,006
|
)
|
|
|
(452,726
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
2,858,580
|
|
|
|
2,993,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(1,018,915
|
)
|
|
|
(704,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON
SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
$
|
1,839,665
|
|
|
$
|
2,289,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per common share after preferred
dividends
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of basic common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
4,964,529
|
|
|
|
4,985,219
|
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of the financial
statements.
33
|
|
Redeemable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance at December 31,
2016
|
|
|
2,396,954
|
|
|
$
|
9,061,307
|
|
|
|
5,016,685
|
|
|
$
|
8,971,575
|
|
|
$
|
16,599,282
|
|
|
$
|
34,632,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock,
net
|
|
|
2,030,957
|
|
|
|
8,278,201
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,278,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
declared
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(704,049
|
)
|
|
|
(704,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued and options
exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
21,630
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock repurchased
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(59,156
|
)
|
|
|
(480,716
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(480,716
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,993,779
|
|
|
|
2,993,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2017
|
|
|
4,427,911
|
|
|
|
17,339,508
|
|
|
|
4,964,529
|
|
|
|
8,512,489
|
|
|
|
18,889,012
|
|
|
|
44,741,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock,
net
|
|
|
234,857
|
|
|
|
979,594
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
979,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
declared
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,018,915
|
)
|
|
|
(1,018,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,858,580
|
|
|
|
2,858,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2018
|
|
|
4,662,768
|
|
|
$
|
18,319,102
|
|
|
|
4,964,529
|
|
|
$
|
8,512,489
|
|
|
$
|
20,728,677
|
|
|
$
|
47,560,268
|
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of the financial
statements.
34
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|||||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,858,580
|
|
|
$
|
2,993,779
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
1,692,463
|
|
|
|
1,544,735
|
|
(Gain)/loss on disposition of
property & equipment
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
(3,269
|
)
|
Non-cash loss from other
assets
|
|
|
14,317
|
|
|
|
10,033
|
|
Loan fee
amortization
|
|
|
13,248
|
|
|
|
11,028
|
|
Deferred rent
liability
|
|
|
(31,544
|
)
|
|
|
(31,543
|
)
|
Deferred income
taxes
|
|
|
613,000
|
|
|
|
(343,773
|
)
|
Deferred gain
|
|
|
(32,094
|
)
|
|
|
(32,095
|
)
|
Change in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable,
net
|
|
|
(592,851
|
)
|
|
|
111,411
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(1,453,515
|
)
|
|
|
(2,822,938
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets
|
|
|
(111,698
|
)
|
|
|
291,638
|
|
Income tax
receivable
|
|
|
(77,063
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Income taxes
payable
|
|
|
(125,297
|
)
|
|
|
(264,501
|
)
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
211,146
|
|
|
|
92,952
|
|
Deferred revenue-distribution
agreement
|
|
|
(95,220
|
)
|
|
|
(142,860
|
)
|
Grapes payable
|
|
|
(436,440
|
)
|
|
|
761,903
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(185,426
|
)
|
|
|
468,405
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
39,702
|
|
|
|
(123,978
|
)
|
Net cash from operating
activities
|
|
|
2,302,113
|
|
|
|
2,520,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to vineyard
development
|
|
|
(1,215,704
|
)
|
|
|
(1,186,046
|
)
|
Additions to property and
equipment
|
|
|
(4,046,161
|
)
|
|
|
(2,782,366
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property
and equipment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53,000
|
|
Net cash from investing
activities
|
|
|
(5,261,865
|
)
|
|
|
(3,915,412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term
debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,672,659
|
|
Proceeds from investor
deposits held as liability
|
|
|
(430,305
|
)
|
|
|
430,305
|
|
Payment on installment note
for property purchase
|
|
|
(212,138
|
)
|
|
|
(298,431
|
)
|
Payments on long-term
debt
|
|
|
(397,274
|
)
|
|
|
(455,208
|
)
|
Issuance of preferred stock,
net
|
|
|
979,594
|
|
|
|
8,278,201
|
|
Payment of preferred stock
dividend
|
|
|
(1,018,915
|
)
|
|
|
(704,049
|
)
|
Proceeds from stock options
exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,630
|
|
Repurchase of common
stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(480,716
|
)
|
Net cash from financing
activities
|
|
|
(1,079,038
|
)
|
|
|
9,464,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(4,038,790
|
)
|
|
|
8,069,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of
year
|
|
|
13,776,257
|
|
|
|
5,706,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of
year
|
|
$
|
9,737,467
|
|
|
$
|
13,776,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property with
notes payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,950,333
|
|
Purchases of property and
equipment and vineyard development costs included in accounts
payable
|
|
|
136,544
|
|
|
|
120,004
|
|
|
|
$
|
136,544
|
|
|
$
|
2,070,337
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of
cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year
for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid (net of
capitalized interest)
|
|
$
|
454,902
|
|
|
$
|
428,194
|
|
Income tax paid
|
|
$
|
670,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,061,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of the financial
statements.
35
Organization and operations –
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. (the “Company”) owns
and operates vineyards and a winery located in the state of Oregon,
and produces and distributes premium, super premium, and
ultra-premium wines, primarily Pinot Noir, Pinot Gris, Chardonnay,
and Riesling.
The Company has direct-to-consumer sales and national sales to
distributors. These sales channels offer comparable products to
customers and utilize similar processes and share resources for
production, selling and distribution. Direct-to-consumer sales
generate a higher gross profit margin than national sales to
distributors due to differentiated pricing between these
segments.
Basis of presentation – The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America, which require management to make certain estimates and
assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements,
and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical
experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances at the time. Actual results
could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
Financial instruments and concentrations of risk – The Company has the following
financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, grapes payable
and long-term debt.
Cash and cash
equivalents are maintained at five financial institutions. Deposits
held with these financial institutions may exceed the amount of
insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may
be redeemed upon demand and are maintained with a financial
institution of reputable credit and therefore bear minimal credit
risk.
In 2018, sales to
one distributor represented approximately 21.0% of total Company
revenue. In 2017, sales to one distributor represented
approximately 18.2% of total Company revenue.
Other comprehensive income – The
nature of the Company’s business and related transactions do
not give rise to other comprehensive income.
Cash and cash equivalents – Cash
and cash equivalents include money market funds.
Accounts receivable – The Company performs
ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and does not require
collateral. A reserve is maintained for potential credit losses.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on an assessment of
the collectability of customer accounts. The Company regularly
reviews the allowance by considering factors such as historical
experience, credit quality, the age of the accounts receivable
balances, and current economic conditions that may affect a
customer’s ability to pay. The Company has credit risk
associated with uncollateralized trade accounts receivable from all
operations totaling $2,352,890 and $1,760,039 as of December 31,
2018 and 2017 exclusive of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
allowance for doubtful accounts is further discussed in Note
2.
Inventories – For Company produced
wines, after a portion of the vineyard becomes commercially
productive, the annual crop and production costs relating to such
portion are recognized as work-in-process inventories. Such costs
are accumulated with related direct and indirect harvest costs,
wine processing and production costs, and are transferred to
finished goods inventories when the wine is produced, bottled, and
ready for sale.
The cost of
finished goods is recognized as cost of sales when the wine product
is sold. Inventories are stated at the lower of first-in, first-out
(“FIFO”) cost or net realizable value by
variety.
In accordance with
general practices in the wine industry, wine inventories are
generally included in current assets in the accompanying balance
sheets, although a portion of such inventories may be aged for more
than one year (Note 3).
36
Vineyard development costs –
Vineyard development costs consist primarily of the costs of the
vines and expenditures related to labor and materials to prepare
the land and construct vine trellises. The costs are capitalized
until the vineyard becomes commercially productive, at which time
annual amortization is recognized using the straight-line method
over the estimated economic useful life of the vineyard, which is
estimated to be 30 years. Accumulated amortization of vineyard
development costs aggregated $1,447,545 and $1,287,682 at December
31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Amortization of
vineyard development costs are included in capitalized crop costs
that in turn are included in inventory costs and ultimately become
a component of cost of goods sold. For the years ending December
31, 2018 and 2017, approximately $159,863 and $101,860,
respectively, was amortized into inventory costs.
Property and equipment – Property
and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated on the
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Land
improvements are depreciated over 15 years. Winery buildings are
depreciated over 30 years. Equipment is depreciated over 3 to 10
years, depending on the classification of the asset. Depreciation
is discussed further in Note 4.
Expenditures for
repairs and maintenance are charged to operating expense as
incurred. Expenditures for additions and betterments are
capitalized. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the
cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the
accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is included in
operations.
Review of long-lived assets for impairment
- The Company evaluates long-lived assets for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be
recoverable. Long-lived assets consist primarily of property and
equipment. Circumstances that might cause the Company to evaluate
its long-lived assets for impairment could include a significant
decline in the prices the Company or the industry can charge for
its products, which could be caused by general economic or other
factors, changes in laws or regulations that make it difficult or
more costly for the Company to distribute its products to its
markets at prices which generate adequate returns, natural
disasters, significant decrease in demand for the Company’s
products or significant increase in the costs to manufacture the
Company’s products.
Recoverability of
assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an
asset group to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be
generated by the asset group. If such assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount
by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value
of the assets. The Company groups its long-lived assets with other
assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable
cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other
assets and liabilities (or asset group). This would typically be at
the winery level. The Company did not recognize any impairment
charges associated with long-lived assets during the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Distribution agreement receivable
– Effective September 1, 2011, the Company entered into an
agreement with Young’s Market Company for distribution of
Company-produced wines in Oregon and Washington. The terms of this
contract include exclusive rights to distribute Willamette Valley
Vineyard’s wines in Oregon and Washington for seven years. In
an effort to facilitate the transition, with as little disruption
as possible, Young’s Market Company agreed to compensate
Willamette Valley Vineyards for ongoing Oregon sales and branding
efforts. As a result, the Company was due to receive $250,000 per
year starting on September 2011 for each of the next four years for
a total of $1,000,000. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the
Company has no distribution agreement receivable with the final
payment having been made in 2014. The total amount of $1,000,000
received by the Company related to this agreement is being
recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the seven-year
life of the agreement. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, the Company has recognized revenue related to this agreement
in the amount of $95,220 and $142,860, respectively, recorded to
other income. As of December 31, 2018 this distribution agreement
has been fully amortized.
Income taxes – Income taxes are recognized
using enacted tax rates and are composed of taxes on financial
accounting income that is adjusted for requirements of current tax
law, and deferred taxes. Deferred taxes are estimated using the
asset and liability approach whereby deferred income taxes are
calculated for the expected future tax consequences of temporary
differences between the book basis and tax basis of the
Company’s assets and liabilities.
37
The Company had no
unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2018 or 2017. The
Company recognizes interest assessed by taxing authorities as a
component of tax expense. The Company recognizes any penalties
assessed by taxing authorities as a component of tax expense.
Interest and penalties for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017 were not material.
The Company files
U.S. federal income tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service
(“IRS”) as well as income tax returns in Oregon,
California, South Carolina and Connecticut. The Company may be
subject to examination by the IRS for tax years 2015 through 2018.
Additionally, the Company may be subject to examinations by state
taxing jurisdictions for tax years 2014 through 2018. The Company
is not aware of any current examinations by the IRS or the state
taxing authorities.
Deferred rent liability – The
Company leases land under a sale-leaseback agreement. The long-term
operating lease has minimum lease payments that escalate every
year. For accounting purposes, rent expense is recognized on the
straight-line basis by dividing the total minimum rents due during
the lease by the number of months in the lease. In the early years
of a lease with escalation clauses, this treatment results in
rental expense recognition in excess of rents paid, and the
creation of a long-term deferred rent liability. As the lease
matures, the deferred rent liability will decrease, and the rental
expense recognized will be less than the rents actually paid. For
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, rent costs paid in
excess of amounts recognized totaled $31,543 and $31,543,
respectively.
Revenue recognition – The Company recognizes revenue
once its performance obligation to the customer is completed and
control of the product or service is transferred to the customer.
Revenue reflects the total amount the Company receives, or expects
to receive, from the customer and includes shipping costs that are
billed and included in the consideration. Excise taxes that are
accrued and paid, as a result of transaction, are accounted for as
an offset to sales in the net sales calculation. The
Company’s contractual obligations to customers generally have
a single point of obligation and are short term in
nature.
Distributor Sales Segment –
Wholesale wine sales are through distributors and the Company
recognizes revenue when the product is shipped, and title passes to
the distributor. The Company’s standard terms are
‘FOB’ shipping point, with no customer acceptance
provisions. The cost of price promotions and rebates are treated as
reductions of revenue. No products are sold on consignment. Credit
sales are recorded as trade accounts receivable and no collateral
is required.
The Company has
price incentive programs with its distributors to encourage product
placement and depletions. The Company estimates the depletion
liability and accrues it as a reduction to revenue in the same
period the revenue is recognized. Incentive program payments are
made when completed incentive program payment requests are received
from the customers. Incentive payments to a customer reduce the
incentive program accrued liability and any differences between the
accrued liability and the actual depletion incentive are recognized
when the payment is made. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, the Company recorded incentive program expenses of $970,462
and $799,942, respectively, as a reduction in sales on the income
statement. As of December 31, 2018, and 2017, the Company has
recorded an incentive program liability in the amount of $41,015
and $49,075, respectively, which is included in accrued expenses on
the balance sheet.
Direct Sales Segment – The
Company sells wine directly to customers through its tasting rooms,
web site and wine club. Additionally, the Company sells
merchandise, food and hospitality related services through its
tasting rooms.
Tasting room and
web site sales are paid for and recognized as revenue at the point
of sale. Hospitality sales, that are paid in advance of the event,
are accrued as unearned revenue and are subsequently recognized as
revenue in the period of the event. Wine club sales are made under
an agreement with the customer which specifies the quantity and
timing of the wine club shipment. Wine club charges are billed to
the customer’s credit card, at the time of shipment, and
revenue is then recognized.
The Company
periodically sells bulk wine or grapes that either do not meet the
Company’s quality standards or are in excess of production
requirements. These sales are recognized when ownership transfers
to the buyer which occurs at the point of shipment.
38
Cost of goods sold – Costs of
goods sold include costs associated with grape growing, external
grape costs, packaging materials, winemaking and production costs,
vineyard and production administrative support and overhead costs,
purchasing and receiving costs and warehousing costs.
Administrative
support, purchasing, receiving and most other fixed overhead costs
are expensed as selling, general and administrative expenses
without regard to inventory units. Warehouse and winery production
and facilities costs, which make up approximately 12% of total
costs, are allocated to inventory units on a per gallon basis
during the production of wine, prior to bottling the final product.
No further costs are allocated to inventory units after
bottling.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
– Selling, general and administrative expenses consist
primarily of non-manufacturing administrative and overhead costs,
advertising and other marketing promotions. Advertising costs are
expensed as incurred or the first time the advertising takes place.
For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, advertising costs
incurred were approximately $212,984 and $136,935
respectively.
The Company
provides an allowance to distributors for providing sample of
products to potential customers. For the years ended December 31,
2018 and 2017, these costs, which are included in selling, general
and administrative expenses, totaled approximately $101,638 and
$116,816, respectively.
Shipping and handling costs –
Amounts paid by customers to the Company for shipping and handling
costs are included in the net revenue. Costs incurred for shipping
and handling charges are included in selling, general and
administrative expense. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, such costs totaled approximately $530,223 and $502,018,
respectively. The Company’s gross margins may not be
comparable to other companies in the same industry as other
companies may include shipping and handling costs as a cost of
goods sold.
Excise taxes – The Company pays alcohol
excise taxes based on product sales to both the Oregon Liquor
Control Commission and to the U.S. Department of the Treasury,
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. The Company is liable for
the taxes upon the removal of product from the Company’s
warehouse on a per gallon basis. The federal tax rate is affected
by a small winery tax credit provision which declines based upon
the number of gallons of wine production in a year rather than the
quantity sold. The Company also pays taxes on the grape harvest on
a per ton basis to the Oregon Liquor Control Commission for the
Oregon Wine Advisory. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, excise taxes incurred were approximately $226,265 and
$532,379 respectively.
Income per common share after preferred
dividends –
Income per share is computed based on the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding each year.
Recently issued accounting standards
(adopted) – In May 2014,
the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606) (“ASU 2014-09”), a new standard to achieve
a consistent application of revenue recognition within the U.S.,
resulting in a single revenue model to be applied by reporting
companies under GAAP. The original effective date for ASU 2014-09
would have required adoption by the Company in the first quarter of
fiscal 2017 with early adoption prohibited. In August 2015, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606) - Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU
2015-14”), which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for
one year and permits early adoption in accordance with the original
effective date of ASU 2014-09.
The new revenue
standard was required to be applied retrospectively to each prior
reporting period presented or prospectively with the cumulative
effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of
initial application. The Company adopted the standard in the first
quarter of 2018 using the modified prospective method. The Company
evaluated the effect of the standard and concluded it was not
material to the Company’s financial reporting. Additionally,
the Company concluded that the application of the standard did not
have a material effect that would require a retrospective
adjustment.
39
The Company
recognizes revenue when obligations under the terms of a contract
with its customer are satisfied, generally, this occurs when the
product is shipped, and title passes to the customer. The
Company’s standard terms are ‘FOB’ shipping
point, with no customer acceptance provisions. Revenue is measured
as the amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange
for transferring products. The cost of price promotions and rebates
are treated as reductions of revenue. No products are sold on
consignment. Credit sales are recorded as trade accounts receivable
and no collateral is required. Revenue from items sold through the
Company’s retail locations is recognized at the time of sale.
Net revenue reported herein is shown net of sales allowances and
excise taxes. If the conditions for revenue recognition are not
met, the Company defers the revenue until all conditions are met.
As of December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017, the Company has
recorded deferred revenue in the amount of $224,848 and $103,246,
respectively, which is included in unearned revenue on the balance
sheet.
The Company has
price incentive programs with its distributors to encourage product
placement and depletions. When recording a sale to the customer, an
incentive program liability is recorded to accrued liabilities and
sales are reported net of incentive program expenses. Incentive
program payments are made when completed incentive program payment
requests are received from the customers. Incentive payments to a
customer reduce the incentive program accrued liability. For the
year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded
incentive program expenses of $970,462 and $799,942, respectively,
as a reduction in sales on the Statement of Income. As of December
31, 2018, and 2017, the Company has recorded an incentive program
liability in the amount of $41,015 and $49,075, respectively, which
is included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet. Estimates are based on historical and
projected experience for each type of program or customer and have
historically been in line with actual costs
incurred.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash
Flows (Topic 320) (“ASU 2016-15”), which clarifies the
presentation of certain cash receipts and cash payment in the
statement of cash flows. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 on January
1, 2018. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact
to the Company’s financial statements.
Recently issued accounting standards (not yet
adopted) - In February 2016,
the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”).
This update requires that lessees recognize assets and liabilities
on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by all
leases with terms of more than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 also will
require disclosures designed to give financial statement users
information on the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows
arising from leases. These disclosures include both qualitative and
quantitative information. The effective date for ASU 2016-02 is for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2018 with earlier adoption permitted.
The Company has evaluated the
impact of the pending adoption of this new standard on its
financial statements and has determined right-of-use assets to be
approximately $5.0 million as of December 31, 2018 of which
approximately $4.8 million, or 96.0%, represent the lease of
vineyard property. The Company will recognize these right-of-use
assets, and their respective liabilities, and amortize them
prospectively beginning in first quarter 2019. The Company believes
implementing this standard will have a material impact on its
Balance Sheet but a minimal direct impact on its Statement of
Income. Because 96.0% of the Company’s leases are for
vineyard land, lease costs are recognized either as part of
capitalized vineyard development costs or inventory valuation
depending on the productive or pre-productive nature of the
vineyard. Therefore, most changes to lease expenses as a result of
this standard will flow through inventory and ultimately become
part of cost of sales.
The accounting
standards that have been issued by the FASB or other
standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a
future date are not expected to have a material impact on our
financial statements upon adoption.
40
NOTE 2 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE,
NET
The Company’s
accounts receivable balance is net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts of $7,098 and $3,977 at December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively. Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts are as
follows:
|
|
Year ended December
31,
|
|
|||||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Balance at Beginning of
Period
|
|
$
|
3,977
|
|
|
$
|
15,921
|
|
Charged to costs and
expenses
|
|
|
4,618
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Charged to other
accounts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Write-offs, net of
recoveries
|
|
|
(1,497
|
)
|
|
|
(11,944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of
Period
|
|
$
|
7,098
|
|
|
$
|
3,977
|
|
NOTE 3 – INVENTORIES
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Winemaking and packaging
materials
|
|
$
|
736,902
|
|
|
$
|
849,825
|
|
Work-in-process (costs
relating to unprocessed and/or unbottled wine
products)
|
|
|
8,527,814
|
|
|
|
8,126,838
|
|
Finished goods (bottled wine
and related products)
|
|
|
6,982,393
|
|
|
|
5,816,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
inventories
|
|
$
|
16,247,109
|
|
|
$
|
14,793,594
|
|
NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND
EQUIPMENT
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Construction in
progress
|
|
$
|
1,747,047
|
|
|
$
|
1,036,615
|
|
Land, improvements and other
buildings
|
|
|
11,135,596
|
|
|
|
10,197,388
|
|
Winery buildings and
hospitality center
|
|
|
15,993,490
|
|
|
|
15,055,935
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
12,750,152
|
|
|
|
11,221,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,626,285
|
|
|
|
37,511,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
(15,841,834
|
)
|
|
|
(14,310,026
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,784,451
|
|
|
$
|
23,201,876
|
|
Depreciation
expense was $1,532,600 and $1,442,875 during the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
NOTE 5 – LINE OF CREDIT
FACILITY
In December of 2005
the Company entered into a revolving line of credit agreement with
Umpqua Bank that allows borrowings of up to $2,000,000 against
eligible accounts receivable and inventories as defined in the
agreement. The revolving line bears interest at prime, is payable
monthly, and is subject to annual renewal. In June of 2018, the
Company renewed the credit agreement until July 31, 2019. The
interest rate was 4.00% at December 31, 2018 and 2017. At December
31, 2018 and 2017 there was no outstanding balance on this
revolving line of credit.
The line of credit
agreement includes various covenants, which among other things,
requires the Company to maintain minimum amounts of tangible net
worth, debt-to-equity, and debt service coverage as defined, and
limits the level of acquisitions of property and equipment. As of
December 31, 2018, the Company was in compliance with these
financial covenants.
41
NOTE 6 – NOTES
PAYABLE
In March of 2017
the Company purchased approximately 45 acres of farmland in the
Walla Walla AVA under terms that included paying one third of the
price upon closing, one third on March 15, 2018 and one third on
March 15, 2019. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had a balance
of $137,667 due on this note. No interest accrues under the terms
of this note.
In February of 2017
the Company purchased property, including vineyard land, bare land
and structures in the Dundee Hills AVA under terms that included a
15 year note payable with quarterly payments of $42,534 at 6%. The
note may be called by the owner, up to the outstanding balance,
with 180 days written notice. As of December 31, 2018, the Company
had a balance of $1,547,514 due on this note.
NOTE 7 – LONG-TERM
DEBT
Long-term debt
consists of:
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|||||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Northwest Farm Credit Services
Loan #4
|
|
|
1,483,733
|
|
|
|
1,597,002
|
|
Northwest Farm Credit Services
Loan #5
|
|
|
5,333,195
|
|
|
|
5,605,725
|
|
Toyota Credit
Corporation
|
|
|
23,906
|
|
|
|
35,381
|
|
|
|
|
6,840,834
|
|
|
|
7,238,108
|
|
Debt issuance
costs
|
|
|
(172,225
|
)
|
|
|
(185,473
|
)
|
Current portion of long-term
debt
|
|
|
(417,293
|
)
|
|
|
(397,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,251,316
|
|
|
$
|
6,655,384
|
|
The Company has two
long term debt agreements with Farm Credit Services with an
aggregate outstanding balance of $6,816,928 and $7,202,727 as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The outstanding loans
require monthly principal and interest payments of $62,067 for the
life of the loans, at annual fixed interest rates of 4.75% and
5.21%, and with maturity dates of 2028 and 2032. The general
purposes of these loans were to make capital improvements to the
winery and vineyard facilities.
The loan agreements
contain covenants, which require the Company to maintain certain
financial ratios and balances. At December 31, 2018, the Company
was in compliance with these covenants. In the event of future
noncompliance with the Company’s debt covenants, FCS would
have the right to declare the Company in default, and at FCS’
option without notice or demand, the unpaid principal balance of
the loan, plus all accrued unpaid interest thereon and all other
amounts due shall immediately become due and payable.
The Company has an
outstanding loan with Toyota Credit Corporation maturing in
February 2021, at zero interest, with an outstanding balance of
$23,906 and $35,381 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The purpose of this loan was to purchase a vehicle.
Future minimum
principal payments of long-term debt mature as follows for the
years ending December 31:
2019
|
|
|
417,293
|
|
2020
|
|
|
438,377
|
|
2021
|
|
|
450,039
|
|
2022
|
|
|
472,418
|
|
2023
|
|
|
496,968
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,565,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,840,834
|
|
The
weighted-average interest rates on the aforementioned borrowings
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was 5.09% and
5.09% respectively.
42
NOTE 8 – SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
The Company is
authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of its common stock. Each
share of common stock is entitled to one vote. At its discretion,
the Board of Directors may declare dividends on shares of common
stock so long as the Company has paid or set aside funds for all
cumulative dividends on its preferred stock. The Board does not
anticipate paying dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable
future.
The Company is
authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Each
share of the Company’s currently issued preferred stock is
non-voting. The Company’s Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock
includes an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and is payable
annually. Additionally, the Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock
contains a liquidation preference over the Company’s common
stock and is subject to optional redemption after June 1, 2021 at
the sole discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. The
liquidation preference is calculated at the original issue price of
$4.15 per share plus all accrued but unpaid dividends. The optional
redemption, if implemented, would be at the original issue price of
$4.15 per share plus all accrued but unpaid dividends plus a
redemption premium of 3% of the original issue price. In November
2018, the Company declared a dividend on its Series A Redeemable
Preferred stock payable to shareholders of record at the close of
business on December 7, 2018 and paid the dividend on December 31,
2018. The Company is current on its dividend
obligations.
NOTE 9 – STOCK INCENTIVE
PLAN
The Company had a
stock incentive plan, originally created in 1992, most recently
amended in 2001. No additional grants may be made under the plan.
All stock options contained an exercise price that was equal to the
fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date the
options were granted.
The following table
presents information on stock options outstanding for the periods
shown:
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Outstanding at beginning of
period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.09
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of
period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The following table
presents information on stock options outstanding for the periods
shown:
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Intrinsic value of options
exercised in the period
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
33,440
|
|
Stock options fully vested and
expected to vest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Weighted average exercise
price
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic
value
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Weighted average contractual
term of options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock options vested and
currently exercisable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Weighted average exercise
price
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic
value
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Weighted average contractual
term of options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no
options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2018 and
2017.
No stock
compensation expense was recognized for the years ended December
31, 2018 and 2017. As of December 31, 2018, there was no
unrecognized compensation expense related to stock
options.
43
NOTE 10 – INCOME
TAXES
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax
legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the
“Tax Act”). The Tax Act made broad and complex changes
to the U.S. tax code, which included reducing the U.S. federal
corporate tax rate from 34 percent to 21 percent in tax years
beginning after December 31, 2017.
The provision
(benefit) for income taxes consists of:
|
|
Year Ended December
31,
|
|
|||||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current tax
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
292,951
|
|
|
$
|
520,984
|
|
State
|
|
|
175,055
|
|
|
|
192,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
468,006
|
|
|
|
713,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense
(benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
478,106
|
|
|
|
(227,632
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
134,894
|
|
|
|
(33,141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613,000
|
|
|
|
(260,773
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,081,006
|
|
|
$
|
452,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective
income tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate as
follows:
|
|
Year Ended December
31,
|
|
|||||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Federal statutory
rate
|
|
|
21.00
|
%
|
|
|
34.00
|
%
|
State taxes, net of federal
benefit
|
|
|
5.93
|
%
|
|
|
4.95
|
%
|
Permanent
differences
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
|
|
-1.69
|
%
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Prior year
adjustments
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
-2.16
|
%
|
Changes in tax rates and
other
|
|
|
-0.07
|
%
|
|
|
-21.97
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.44
|
%
|
|
|
13.13
|
%
|
Permanent differences for the periods consist primarily of changes
in tax treatment of meals and entertainment as well as political
contributions. Changes in tax rate are described
above.
Net deferred tax
assets and (liabilities) at December 31 consist of:
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred gain on
sale-leaseback
|
|
|
6,727
|
|
|
|
15,368
|
|
Other
|
|
|
48,263
|
|
|
|
35,469
|
|
Prepaids
|
|
|
(40,692
|
)
|
|
|
(27,909
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(1,989,100
|
)
|
|
|
(1,487,036
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(225,425
|
)
|
|
|
(123,119
|
)
|
Net noncurrent deferred tax
liability
|
|
|
(2,200,227
|
)
|
|
|
(1,587,227
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
allowance
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net deferred tax
liability
|
|
$
|
(2,200,227
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,587,227
|
)
|
44
NOTE 11 – RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
The Company
provides living accommodations in a residence on the
Company’s premises, at its convenience, for the
Company’s President. The President provides security and
lock-up services and is required to live on premises as a condition
of his employment. Over the years the Company has recorded annual
expenses less than $12,000, exclusive of depreciation, related to
the housing provided for its president.
NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
Litigation – From time to time, in
the normal course of business, the Company is a party to legal
proceedings. Management believes that these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position,
results of operations or cash flows, but, due to the nature of
litigation, the ultimate outcome of any potential actions cannot
presently be determined.
Operating leases – Vineyard - In December 1999,
under a sale-leaseback agreement, the Company sold approximately 79
acres of the Tualatin Vineyards property with a net book value of
approximately $1,000,000 for approximately $1,500,000 cash and
entered into a 20-year operating lease agreement, with three
five-year extension options, and contains an escalation provision
of 2.5% per year. The gain of approximately $500,000 is being
amortized over the life of the lease. This property is referred to
as the Peter Michael
Vineyard and includes approximately 66 acres of producing
vineyards.
In December 2004,
under a sale-leaseback agreement, the Company sold approximately 75
acres of the Tualatin Vineyards property with a net book value of
approximately $551,000 for approximately $727,000 cash and entered
into a 15-year operating lease agreement, with three five-year
extension options, for the vineyard portion of the property. The
lease contains a formula-based escalation provision with a maximum
increase of 4% every three years. Approximately $99,000 of the
total gain of $176,000 has been deferred and is being amortized
over the life of the lease. This property is referred to as the
Meadowview
Vineyard, and includes approximately 49 acres of producing
vineyards.
The amortization of
the deferred gain totals approximately $25,000 per year for the
1999 sale-leaseback agreement and $7,000 for the 2004
sale-leaseback agreement and is recorded as an offset to the
related lease expense in selling, general and administrative
expenses.
In February 2007,
the Company entered into a lease agreement for 59 acres of vineyard
land at Elton
Vineyards. This lease is for a 10-year term with four
five-year renewals at the Company’s option. The lease
contains an escalation provision tied to the CPI not to exceed 2%
per annum. In 2017 the Company exercised its option to renew the
lease until December 31, 2022.
In July 2008, the
Company entered into a 34-year lease agreement with a property
owner in the Eola Hills for approximately 110 acres adjacent to the
existing Elton Vineyards site. These 110 acres are being developed
into vineyards. Terms of this agreement contain rent increases,
that rises as the vineyard is developed, and contains an escalation
provision of CPI plus .5% per year capped at 4%. This property is
referred to as part of Ingram Vineyard.
In March 2017, the
Company entered into a 25-year lease for approximately 18 acres of
agricultural land in Dundee, Oregon. These acres are being
developed into vineyards. This lease contains an annual payment
that remains constant throughout the term of the lease. This
property is referred to as part of Bernau Estate
Vineyard.
Operating Leases – Non-Vineyard -
In September 2018, the Company renewed an existing lease for three
years, with two one-year renewal options, for its McMinnville tasting room. The
lease contains an escalation provision with a cap at 3% per
year.
In January 2018,
the Company assumed a lease, with four remaining years, for its
Maison Bleue tasting
room in Walla Walla, Washington. The lease contains fixed
payments that increase over the term of the agreement.
45
As of December 31,
2018, future minimum lease payments are as follows for the years
ending December 31:
2019
|
|
|
500,740
|
|
2020
|
|
|
509,576
|
|
2021
|
|
|
507,398
|
|
2022
|
|
|
486,595
|
|
2023
|
|
|
327,885
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2,607,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,939,501
|
|
The Company is also
committed to lease payments for various pieces of office equipment
and temporary property rentals. Total rental expense for these
operating leases amounted to $14,422 and $12,866 in 2018 and 2017,
respectively. In addition, payments for the leased vineyards have
been included in inventory or vineyard developments costs and
aggregate approximately $404,920 and $379,230 for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Grape Purchases – The Company has
entered into a long-term grape purchase agreement with one of its
Willamette Valley wine grape growers. This contract amended and
extended three separate contracts and purchases fruit through the
2023 harvest year. With this agreement the Company purchases an
annually agreed upon quantity of fruit, at pre-determined prices,
within strict quality standards and crop loads. The Company cannot
calculate the minimum or maximum payment as such a calculation is
dependent in large part on unknowns such as the quantity of fruit
needed by the Company and the availability of grapes produced that
meet the strict quality standards in any given year. If no grapes
are produced that meet the contractual quality levels, the grapes
may be refused, and no payment would be due.
NOTE 13 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
PLAN
In February 2006,
the Company instituted a 401(k) profit sharing plan (the
“Plan”) covering all eligible employees. Employees who
participate may elect to make salary deferral contributions to the
Plan up to 100% of the employees’ eligible payroll subject to
annual Internal Revenue Code maximum limitations. The Company may
make a discretionary contribution to the entire qualified employee
pool, in accordance with the Plan. For the years ended December 31,
2018 and 2017 there were $105,258 and $74,651 contributions made by
the Company to the 401(k) plan, respectively.
NOTE 14 – SALE OF PREFERRED
STOCK
In August 2015, the Company commenced a public offering of our
Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock pursuant to a registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
preferred stock under this issue is non-voting and ranks senior in
rights and preferences to the Company’s common stock.
Shareholders of this issue are entitled to receive dividends, when
and as declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, at a
rate of $0.22 per share. Dividends accrued but not paid will be
added to the liquidation preference of the stock until the dividend
is declared and paid. At any time after June 1, 2021, the Company
has the option, but not the obligation, to redeem all of the
outstanding preferred stock in an amount equal to the original
issue price of $4.15 per share plus accrued but unpaid dividends
and a redemption premium equal to 3% of the original issue price of
$4.15 per share. The Company registered this transaction with the
securities authorities of the States of Oregon and Washington and
subsequently obtained a listing on the NASDAQ under the trading
symbol WVVIP. This issue had an aggregate initial offering price
not to exceed $6,000,000 and was fully subscribed as of December
31, 2015.
On December 23, 2015 the Company filed a Registration Statement on
Form S-3 with the SEC pertaining to the potential future issuance
of one or more classes or series of debt, equity or derivative
securities. On February 28, 2016 shareholders of the Series A
Redeemable Preferred Stock approved an increase in shares
designated as Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock, from 1,445,783
to 2,857,548 shares, and amended the certificate of designation for
those shares to allow the Company’s Board of Directors to
make future increases.
On March 10, 2016 the Company filed with the SEC a Prospectus
Supplement to the December 2015 Form S-3, pursuant to which the
Company proposed to offer and sell, on a delayed or continuous
basis, up to 970,588 additional shares of Series A Redeemable
Preferred stock having proceeds not to exceed $4,125,000. This
stock was established to be sold in four offering periods beginning
with an offering price of $4.25 per share and concluding at $4.55
per share. The Company sold all preferred stock available under
this offering.
46
On May 3, 2017, the
Company filed with the SEC a Prospectus Supplement to the
December 2015 Form S-3,
pursuant to which the Company proposed to offer and sell, on a
delayed or continuous basis, up to 2,298,851 additional shares of
Series A Redeemable Preferred stock having proceeds not to exceed
$10,000,000. This stock was established to be sold in four offering
periods beginning with an offering price of $4.35 per share and
concluding at $4.65 per share. The Company sold all preferred stock
available under this offering.
NOTE 15 – SEGMENT
REPORTING
The Company has
identified two operating segments, Direct Sales and Distributor
Sales, based upon their different distribution channels, margins
and selling strategies. Direct Sales includes retail sales in the
tasting room and remote sites, Wine Club sales, on-site events,
kitchen and catering sales and other sales made directly to the
consumer without the use of an intermediary. Distributor Sales
include all sales through a third party where prices are given at a
wholesale rate.
The two segments
reflect how the Company’s operations are evaluated by senior
management and the structure of its internal financial reporting.
The Company evaluates performance based on the gross profit of the
respective business segments. Selling expenses that can be directly
attributable to the segment, including depreciation of segment
specific assets, are included however centralized selling expenses
and general and administrative expenses are not allocated between
operating segments. Therefore, net income information for the
respective segments is not available. Discrete financial
information related to segment assets, other than segment specific
depreciation associated with selling, is not available and that
information continues to be aggregated.
The following table
outlines the sales, cost of sales, gross margin, directly
attributable selling expenses, and contribution margin of the
segments for the twelve-month periods ending December 31, 2018 and
2017. Sales figures are net of related excise taxes.
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Direct
Sales
|
|
|
Distributor
Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Sales, net
|
|
$
|
9,115,074
|
|
|
$
|
8,340,366
|
|
|
$
|
13,964,665
|
|
|
$
|
12,513,161
|
|
|
$
|
23,079,739
|
|
|
$
|
20,853,527
|
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
2,430,148
|
|
|
|
2,237,599
|
|
|
|
5,868,092
|
|
|
|
5,734,077
|
|
|
|
8,298,240
|
|
|
|
7,971,676
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
6,684,926
|
|
|
|
6,102,767
|
|
|
|
8,096,573
|
|
|
|
6,779,084
|
|
|
|
14,781,499
|
|
|
|
12,881,851
|
|
Selling Expenses
|
|
|
4,255,324
|
|
|
|
3,854,772
|
|
|
|
2,134,665
|
|
|
|
1,805,840
|
|
|
|
6,389,989
|
|
|
|
5,660,612
|
|
Contribution
Margin
|
|
$
|
2,429,602
|
|
|
$
|
2,247,995
|
|
|
$
|
5,961,908
|
|
|
$
|
4,973,244
|
|
|
$
|
8,391,510
|
|
|
$
|
7,221,239
|
|
Percent of
Sales
|
|
39.5%
|
|
|
40.0%
|
|
|
60.5%
|
|
|
60.0%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
Direct sales
include $368,046 and $350,640 of bulk wine and grape sales in the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Net
direct-to-consumer sales, including bulk wine, miscellaneous sales,
and grape sales, represented approximately 39.5% and 40.0% of total
net revenue for 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Net sales through
distributors represented approximately 60.5% and 60.0% of total net
revenue for 2018 and 2017, respectively.
NOTE 16 – SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
Subsequent events
are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date
but before financial statements are issued. The Company recognizes
in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events
that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at
the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in
the process of preparing the financial statements. The
Company’s financial statements do not recognize subsequent
events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at
the date of the balance sheet but arose after the balance sheet
date and before financial statements are issued. The Company has
not identified any material subsequent events.
47
None
Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
We carried out an
evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-5(e) under the Exchange Act) pursuant to
paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-5 under the Exchange Act.
Based on that review, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period
covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our disclosure controls
and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the
Exchange Act (1) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported
within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
It should be noted
that any system of controls is based in part upon certain
assumptions designed to obtain reasonable (and not absolute)
assurance as to its effectiveness, and there can be no assurance
that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
goals.
Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Management’s report on internal control
over financial reporting
The Company’s
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the
Company’s financial reporting and the preparation of the
Company’s financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal
control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act and includes those
policies and procedures that: (a) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s
assets; (b) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that the Company’s receipts and expenditures are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of the Company’s
management and directors; and (c) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the Company’s financial
statements. All internal controls, no matter how well designed,
have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined
to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect
to financial statement preparation and presentation.
The Company’s
management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.
In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework
(2013). Based on this assessment, management has concluded
that, as of December 31, 2018, our internal control over financial
reporting was effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Beginning January
1, 2018, we implemented internal controls to ensure we have
adequately evaluated our contracts and properly assessed the impact
of the new accounting standard related to revenue recognition to
facilitate adoption on that date. We do not expect any further
significant changes to our internal control over financial
reporting due to the adoption of the new standard.
There have not been
any other changes in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the Company’s fourth
fiscal quarter that our certifying officers concluded materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
None.
48
The following table
sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s
directors and executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
Term
|
Name
|
|
Position(s) with the
Company
|
|
Age
|
|
Number
|
|
Ends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Bernau
(3)
|
|
Chairperson of the Board,
CEO
President and Director |
|
65
|
|
I
|
|
2020
|
Craig Smith
(2)(3)(4)
|
|
Secretary and
Director
|
|
72
|
|
II
|
|
2021
|
Richard F. Goward
Jr.
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
63
|
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
James L. Ellis
(3)
|
|
Director
|
|
74
|
|
III
|
|
2019
|
Sean M. Cary (2)
|
|
Director
|
|
45
|
|
I
|
|
2020
|
Christopher L. Sarles
(1)(4)
|
|
Director
|
|
54
|
|
I
|
|
2020
|
Stan G. Turel
(1)(2)(3)(4)
|
|
Director
|
|
70
|
|
II
|
|
2021
|
Heather Westing
(1)(4)
|
|
Director
|
|
60
|
|
III
|
|
2019
|
(1)
|
Member of the
Compensation Committee
|
(2)
|
Member of the Audit
Committee
|
(3)
|
Member of the
Executive Committee
|
(4)
|
Member of the
Capital Development Committee
|
All directors hold
office until the end of their term’s respective annual
meeting of shareholders or until their successors have been elected
and qualified. Executive officers are appointed by the Board of
Directors and serve at the pleasure of the Board. The Board is
divided into three groups (I, II, and III). Each director
shall serve for a term ending on the date of the third annual
meeting following the annual meeting at which such director was
elected.
Except for Mr.
Goward’s stepdaughter who is married to Mr. Smith’s
son, there are no family relationships among any of our current
directors or executive officers. Set forth below is additional
information as to each director and executive officer of the
Company.
James W. Bernau – Mr. Bernau has
been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
Chairperson of the Board of Directors of the Company since its
inception in May 1988. Mr. Bernau, an Oregon winegrower, originally
established Willamette Valley Vineyards as a sole proprietorship in
1983, and he co-founded the Company in 1988 with Salem grape
grower, Donald Voorhies. From 1981 to September 1989, Mr. Bernau
was Director of the Oregon Chapter of the National Federation of
Independent Businesses (“NFIB”), an association of
15,000 independent businesses in Oregon. Mr. Bernau has served as
the President of the Oregon Winegrowers Association and the
Treasurer of the association’s Political Action Committee
(PAC) and Chair of the Promotions Committee of the Oregon Wine
Advisory Board, the State of Oregon’s agency dedicated to the
development of the industry. In March 2005, Mr. Bernau received the
industry’s Founder’s Award for his service. Mr.
Bernau’s qualifications to serve on the Company’s Board
of Directors include his more than 30 years of leadership of the
Company and his industry experience and contacts.
Craig Smith, MBA, JD – Mr. Smith
has served as a director since October 2007 and as Secretary since
2009. For over 20 years Mr. Smith served as the Vice
President/Chief Financial Officer of Chemeketa Community College in
Salem, Oregon. He was an Adjunct Professor at the Atkinson Graduate
School of Management at Willamette University, as well as Managing
Partner of Faler, Grove, Mueller & Smith, a large local CPA
firm. He has served on many State of Oregon commissions and as the
Board Chairperson for many of the local non-profit and educational
institutions including the Salem Keizer School Board, Chemeketa
Community College Board of Education, Oregon State Fair Council,
State Fair Dismissal Appeals Board, Mid-Willamette Valley Council
of Governments, Oregon School Boards Association and the United
Way. Mr. Smith is a member of the Oregon State Bar and a retired
Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Smith’s qualifications to
serve on the Company’s Board of Directors include his
financial and accounting experience.
49
Richard F. Goward Jr., CPA, CMA, MBA
– Mr. Goward has been the Company’s Chief
Financial Officer since May of 2013. Prior to being appointed, Mr.
Goward served as Chief Financial Officer for Oregon’s largest
city, the City of Portland, a position he retired from after
serving from April 2010 to May 2013. From June 1997 to April 2010,
Mr. Goward served as Chief Financial Officer at Salem-Keizer Public
Schools, the second largest school district in the State of Oregon.
From November 1986 to June 1997, Mr. Goward worked at Chemeketa
Community College as manager of the Business Office and Director of
Auxiliary Services. Mr. Goward has also worked as a partner in
Faler, Grove, Mueller & Smith CPAs, has 26 years of experience
as an officer in the United States Navy and Navy Reserve; retiring
at the rank of Captain, for 20 years was an Adjunct Professor in
Accounting at Willamette University’s Atkinson Graduate
School of Management and has served on many community boards and
committees. Mr. Goward is licensed as a CPA in the State of Oregon
and is a Certified Management Accountant. He holds a Bachelor of
Science Degree in Business from Oregon State University and a
Masters in Business Administration from Willamette
University.
James L. Ellis – Mr. Ellis has
served as a director since July 1991. Mr. Ellis retired from full
time duties with the Company in July of 2009. He currently serves
as the Company’s ombudsman and works part-time on selected
projects. Mr. Ellis previously served as the Company’s
Director of Human Resources from 1993 to 2009. He was the
Company’s Secretary from 1997 to 2009, and Vice President
/Corporate from 1998 to 2009. From 1990 to 1992, Mr. Ellis was a
partner in Kenneth L. Fisher, Ph.D. & Associates, a
management-consulting firm. From 1980 to 1990, Mr. Ellis was Vice
President and General Manager of R.A. Kevane & Associates, a
Pacific Northwest personnel-consulting firm. From 1962 to 1979, Mr.
Ellis was a member of and administrator for the Christian Brothers
of California, owner of Mont La Salle Vineyards and producer of
Christian Brothers wines and brandy. Mr. Ellis’
qualifications to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors
include his prior experience as a member of the Company’s
senior management, as well as more than 40 years of business
experience.
Sean M. Cary –
Mr. Cary has served as a director since July 2007. Mr. Cary is the
Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Excavation, Inc., a Eugene,
Oregon based heavy and civil engineering contractor. Previously,
Mr. Cary served as the CFO of CBT Nuggets, LLC, the Corporate
Controller of National Warranty Corporation, the CFO of Cascade
Structural Laminators and prior to that as Controller of Willamette
Valley Vineyards. Mr. Cary served in the U.S. Air Force as a
Financial Officer. Mr. Cary holds a Master of Business
Administration degree from the University of Oregon and a Bachelor
of Science Degree in Management from the U.S. Air Force Academy.
Mr. Cary’s qualifications to serve on the Company’s
Board of Directors include his financial and accounting
expertise.
Christopher L. Sarles – Mr.
Sarles has served as a director since January of 2015. Mr. Sarles
is the President/CEO of Oregon Fruit Products, a position he has
held since July of 2014. From May of 1998 until June of 2014 Mr.
Sarles worked in various executive capacities in Columbia
Distributing/Young’s Market, most recently as Executive Vice
President of Sales from 2011 to 2014. From 1987 to 1995 he was
President/Chief Operating Officer of Alehouse Distributing Company
in Seattle Washington. Mr. Sarles has been actively involved in the
wine industry, been a speaker on Wine Industry issues, and served
as President of the Oregon Beer and Wine Wholesalers Association.
He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Marketing from
Oregon State University. Mr. Sarles is qualified to serve on the
Company’s Board of Directors as a result of his many years of
executive experience in the alcohol distribution
industry.
Stan G. Turel – Mr. Turel has
served as a director since November 1994. Mr. Turel is President of
Turel Enterprises, a real estate management company managing his
own properties in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and is president of
Columbia Pacific Tax in Bend, Oregon. Prior to his current
activities, Mr. Turel was the Principal and CEO of Columbia Turel,
(formerly Columbia Bookkeeping, Inc.) a position which he held from
1974 to 2001. Prior to the sale of the company to Fiducial, one of
Europe’s largest accounting firms, Columbia had approximately
26,000 annual tax clients including approximately 4,000 small
business clients. Additionally, Mr. Turel successfully operated as
majority owner of two cable TV companies during the 80’s and
90’s which were eventually sold to several public
corporations. Mr. Turel is a pilot, author, was a former delegate
to the White House Conference on Small Business and held positions
on several state and local Government committees. Mr. Turel’s
qualifications to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors
include his more than 20 years of accounting and business
management experience.
50
Heather Westing – Ms. Westing has
served as a director since March 2016. Ms. Westing owns several
real estate developments, restaurant and financial companies in
Oregon. She is the former owner of The Subway Group –
franchisor agency for over 350 Subway Restaurants and served on
Subway’s Worldwide Advisory Board. Ms. Westing is an active
member in the Oregon Venture Fund, and oversees the Westing Family
Foundation. Previously, Ms. Westing owned an advertising and
marketing agency, with offices in Eugene, Portland and Bend. She
has also owned and operated a 50-acre farm of filberts, grass seed
and Christmas trees. She served on Umpqua Bank’s Regional
Board of Advisory and The Oregon Bach Festival’s Board of
Directors. She is a Lifetime Alumni of University of Oregon, where
she studied finance and real estate. Ms. Westing’s
qualifications to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors
include her extensive business experience and expertise in
marketing.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s
officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of a
registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file
certain reports with the SEC regarding ownership of, and
transactions in, the Company’s securities. These officers,
directors and stockholders are also required by SEC rules to
furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports
that are filed with the SEC. Based solely on a review of copies of
such forms received by the Company and written representations
received by the Company from certain reporting persons, the Company
believes that for the year ended December 31, 2018 all Section
16(a) reports required to be filed by the Company’s executive
officers, directors and 10% stockholders were filed on a timely
basis with the exception of one Form 4 filing for James Bernau that
was filed late and one Form 4 filing for Heather Westing that was
filed late.
Code of Ethics
The Company has
adopted a code of ethics applicable to its principal executive
officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer
or controller, or persons performing similar functions, which is a
“code of ethics” as defined by applicable rules of the
SEC. A copy of the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics is posted on the Company’s web site, www.wvv.com.
Amendments to the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics or any grant of a waiver from a provision of the
Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requiring
disclosure under applicable SEC rules, if any, will be disclosed on
the Company website at www.wvv.com. Any person may request a copy
of the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, at no
cost, by writing to the Company at the following
address:
Willamette Valley
Vineyards, Inc.
Attention: Corporate Secretary
8800 Enchanted Way SE
Turner, OR 97392
Attention: Corporate Secretary
8800 Enchanted Way SE
Turner, OR 97392
Audit Committee
The Company has a
separately designated standing audit committee established in
accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The
members of the Audit Committee are Craig Smith, Sean Cary and Stan
G. Turel. All members of the Audit Committee are independent as
defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and
the director independence standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market, as
currently in effect. Sean Cary serves as chair of the
committee.
Audit Committee Financial
Expert
Craig Smith serves
as the Audit Committee’s “financial expert” as
defined in applicable SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards. Mr.
Smith is independent as defined under the applicable rules and
regulations of the SEC and the director independence standards of
the NASDAQ Stock Market, as currently in effect.
51
Summary Compensation Table
The following table
sets forth certain information concerning compensation paid or
accrued by the Company, to or on behalf of the Company’s
principal executive officer, James W. Bernau and Chief Financial
Officer Richard F. Goward Jr. for the fiscal years ended December
31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. No other executive officer of the
Company other than Mr. Bernau and Mr. Goward received total
compensation in 2018 in excess of $100,000, and thus disclosure is
not required for any other person. Summary compensation information
is as follows:
Summary Compensation
Table
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Name,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive
Plan
|
|
|
Comp.
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Principal
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Comp.*
|
|
|
Total
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Bernau, James W.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President, Chief
Executive
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
265,441
|
|
|
$
|
265,441
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
48,675
|
|
|
$
|
579,557
|
|
President, Chief
Executive
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
259,564
|
|
|
$
|
214,738
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
46,833
|
|
|
$
|
521,135
|
|
Goward, Richard F.
Jr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
128,944
|
|
|
$
|
15,315
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,320
|
|
|
$
|
150,579
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
126,090
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,183
|
|
|
$
|
147,273
|
|
|
*
|
All other
compensation includes Company payments for medical insurance, value
of lodging, Board of Director stipends, life insurance payments and
Company 401(k) matching contributions.
|
Bernau Employment Agreement – The
Company and Mr. Bernau are parties to an employment agreement dated
August 3, 1988 as amended on February 20, 1997, in January of 1998,
in November 2010, and again on November 8, 2012. Under the amended
agreement, Mr. Bernau is paid an annual salary of $235,000 with
annual increases tied to increases in the consumer price index. Mr.
Bernau’s 2018 bonus is calculated as a percentage of Company
net income before taxes; 5% on the first $1.75 million of pre-tax
income, and 7.5% on the pre-tax net income over $1.75 million, not
to exceed his current year base salary. Additionally, Mr. Bernau
participates in the employer sponsored 401(k) plan. Pursuant to the
terms of the employment agreement, the Company is to provide Mr.
Bernau with housing on the Company’s property. Mr. Bernau
resides in the estate house, free of rent, which is also used to
accommodate overnight stays for Company guests. Mr. Bernau resides
in the residence for the convenience of the Company and must
continue to reside there for the duration of his employment in
order to provide additional security and lock-up services for late
evening events at the Winery and Vineyard. The employment agreement
provides that Mr. Bernau’s employment may be terminated only
for cause, which is defined as non-performance of his duties or
conviction of a crime.
Goward Employment Agreement – The
Company and Mr. Goward are parties to an employment agreement dated
April 16, 2013 as amended on July 15, 2015. Under the agreement Mr.
Goward is paid an annual salary of $131,078 and is reviewed
annually for potential meritorious awards. Additionally, Mr. Goward
receives the equivalent of a board stipend for board meetings
outside of the normal working schedule. Mr. Goward also
participates in the employer sponsored 401(k) plan.
52
Director compensation
The following table
sets forth information concerning compensation of the
Company’s directors other than Mr. Bernau for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Fees
Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
or
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive
Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Name
|
|
Paid in
Cash
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
James L. Ellis
|
|
$
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
360
|
|
|
$
|
13,360
|
|
Sean M. Cary
|
|
|
4,900
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,900
|
|
Christopher L.
Sarles
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Craig Smith
|
|
|
3,850
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,850
|
|
Stan G. Turel
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
Heather Westing
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
Betty
O’Brien*
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Retired from the
Board of Directors on July 15, 2018
|
Other compensation
for James L. Ellis includes a monthly stipend for ongoing
consultation services as well as serving as administrator of any
potential employee complaint that might rise to the board of
directors’ level. The members of the Board received cash
compensation for their service on the Board in 2018 and were
reimbursed for out-of-pocket and travel expenses incurred in
attending Board meetings.
In January 2009,
the Board, upon recommendation of the Board’s Compensation
Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), who had
sought outside counsel regarding revision of the Company’s
Board Compensation Plan, adopted the final version of the revised
WVV Board Member Compensation Plan. Under the terms of the revised
plan, any Board member may elect not to receive any or all of the
compensation components. The Board also reserved the right to
suspend this plan at any time on the basis of prevailing economic
conditions and their impact on the company. The basic elements of
the revised plan are: $1,000 yearly stipend for service on the
Board, $500 per Board meeting attended in person, $250 per Board
meeting via teleconference, $200 per committee meeting in person
and $100 per committee meeting via teleconference. A set per diem
for expenses associated with meeting attendance, as well as a
yearly wine allowance were also approved.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Equity compensation plan
information
The Company does
not have active equity compensation plans and no options or other
equity awards outstanding.
Security ownership of certain beneficial owners
and management
The following table
sets forth certain information with respect to beneficial ownership
of the Company’s Common Stock as of March 21, 2019, by (i)
each person who beneficially owns more than 5% of the
Company’s Common Stock, (ii) each Director of the Company,
(iii) each of the Company’s named executive officers, and
(iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. Except as
indicated in the footnotes to this table, each person has sole
voting and investment power with respect to all shares attributable
to such person.
Information
concerning persons who beneficially own more than 5% of the
Company’s common stock who are not otherwise affiliated with
the Company is based solely upon statements made in filings with
the SEC or other information we believe to be
reliable.
53
Unless otherwise
noted, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table is
8800 Enchanted Way SE Turner, OR 97392.
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
of
|
|
||
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
||
|
|
Shares
Outstanding
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
||
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Owned (1)
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
James W. Bernau,
President/CEO, Chair of the Board
|
|
|
432,926
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard F. Goward Jr.,
CFO
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James L. Ellis,
Director
|
|
|
19,865
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher L. Sarles,
Director
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sean M. Cary,
Director
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stan G. Turel,
Director
|
|
|
14,192
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig Smith,
Director
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heather Westing,
Director
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
Riccardi
|
|
|
385,485
|
(2)
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
100 Tall Pine Ln., Apt 2102,
Naples, FL 34105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl D. Thoma
|
|
|
336,189
|
(3)
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
300 N. LaSalle St, Suite 4350.
Chicago, IL 60654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Directors and Executive
Officers as a group (8 persons)
|
|
|
479,003
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
Less than one
percent
|
(1)
|
The percentage of
outstanding shares of common stock is calculated out of a total of
4,964,529 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 21, 2019.
Shares owned do not include ownership of preferred stock
shares.
|
(2)
|
Based on a Form 4
filed by Mr. Riccardi with the SEC on December 29,
2015
|
(3)
|
Based on a Schedule
13G/A filed by Mr. Thoma with the SEC on February 8, 2017.
Beneficial ownership includes 139,429 shares held by the Carl D.
Thoma Roth IRA, TD Ameritrade Clearing Custodian for the benefit of
Mr. Thoma.
|
In 2007, the
Company entered into a long-term lease for Elton vineyards which
consists of 54 acres of mature grapevines, of which approximately
42 acres are Pinot Noir. The agreement was for an initial 10-year
lease with the option to renew for four successive terms of five
years each, plus a first right of refusal on the property’s
sale. Betty O’ Brien, a member of the Board through the
annual meeting in 2018, is the owner of the lessor, Elton
Vineyards, LLC. As such, she is therefore entitled to the net
income of Elton Vineyards, LLC. In 2018, the Company paid Elton
Vineyards, LLC $135,749 in lease payments and utility
reimbursements.
The Company
believes that the transactions set forth above were made on terms
no less favorable to the Company than could have been obtained from
unaffiliated third parties. All future transactions between the
Company and its officers, directors, and principal shareholders
will be approved by a disinterested majority of the members of the
Board and will be on terms no less favorable to the Company than
could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties. After reviewing
the relationship between the Company and Elton Vineyards, LLC, in
each of the last three years, the Board has determined that Ms.
O’Brien was “independent” within the meaning of
the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the director
independence standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market
(“NASDAQ”).
54
Except for payments
to Elton Vineyards, LLC described above, during 2018 the Company
did not participate in any transactions with related persons that
had a direct or indirect material interest in an amount exceeding
$120,000 and there are no currently proposed transactions with
related persons that exceed $120,000.
The Board has
determined that each of our directors, except Mr. Bernau and
Mr. Ellis is “independent” within the meaning of the
applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the director
independence standards of NASDAQ, as currently in effect.
Furthermore, the Board has determined that, with the exception of
the Executive Committee, each of the members of each of the
committees of the Board is “independent” under the
applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the director
independence standards of NASDAQ, as currently in
effect.
Moss Adams LLP
served as the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Fees for professional services provided by our independent
registered public accounting firm in each of the last two fiscal
years, in each of the following categories are:
|
|
Years Ended December
31,
|
|
|||||
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Audit fees (1)
|
|
$
|
167,000
|
|
|
$
|
141,000
|
|
Tax fees (2)
|
|
|
71,500
|
|
|
|
38,940
|
|
All other fees
(3)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
238,500
|
|
|
$
|
179,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Audit fees
represent fees for services rendered for the audit of the
Company’s annual financial statements and review of the
Company’s quarterly financial statements.
|
(2)
|
Tax fees represent
fees for services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax
planning
|
(3)
|
All other fees
represent limited engagement activity.
|
The Company did not
incur any audit related fees in either 2018 or 2017.
Pre-approval policies and
procedures
It is the policy of
the Company not to enter into any agreement for Moss Adams LLP to
provide any non-audit services to the Company unless (a) the
agreement is approved in advance by the Audit Committee or
(b) (i) the aggregate amount of all such non-audit
services constitutes no more than 5% of the total amount the
Company pays to Moss Adams LLP during the fiscal year in which such
services are rendered, (ii) such services were not recognized
by the Company as constituting non-audit services at the time of
the engagement of the non-audit services and (iii) such
services are promptly brought to the attention of the Audit
Committee and prior to the completion of the audit were approved by
the Audit Committee or by one or more members of the Audit
Committee who are members of the Board to whom authority to grant
such approvals has been delegated by the Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee will not approve any agreement in advance for non-audit
services unless (1) the procedures and policies are detailed
in advance as to such services, (2) the Audit Committee is
informed of such services prior to commencement and (3) such
policies and procedures do not constitute delegation of the Audit
Committee’s responsibilities to management under the Exchange
Act.
55
|
(a)
|
The following
documents are filed as part of this report:
|
|
(1)
|
Financial
Statements
|
See “Index to
Financial Statements” in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
|
(2)
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
All financial
statement schedules are omitted either because they are not
required, not applicable or the required information is included in
the financial statements or notes thereto.
|
(3)
|
Exhibits
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. (incorporated by reference from the
Company’s Regulation A Offering Statement on Form 1-A [File
No. 24S-2996])
|
|
||
|
||
10.1
|
|
Employment Agreement between
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. and James W. Bernau dated August
3, 1988 as amended on February 20, 1997, in January of 1998, in
November 2010, and on November 8, 2012 (incorporated by reference from the
Company’s Regulation A Offering Statement on Form 1-A [File
No. 24S-2996])
|
10.2
|
|
Indemnity Agreement between
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. and James W. Bernau dated May 2,
1988 (incorporated by reference
from the Company’s Regulation A Offering Statement on Form
1-A [File No. 24S-2996])
|
10.3
|
|
Revolving Note and Loan Agreement
dated May 28, 1992 by and between Northwest Farm Credit Services,
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. and James W. and Cathy Bernau
(incorporated by reference from
the Company’s Regulation A Offering Statement on Form 1-A
[File No. 24S-2996])
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
101
|
|
The following
financial information from the Corporation’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, furnished
electronically herewith, and formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business
Reporting Language); (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii)
Consolidated Statements of Income; (iii) Consolidated Statements of
Shareholders’ Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged
as blocks of text. (Filed herewith)
|
|
*
|
Confidential
treatment of certain portions of this exhibit has been granted by
the SEC pursuant to a request for confidential treatment dated
November 10, 2011.
|
|
(1)
|
The exhibits listed
under Item 15(a)(3) hereof are filed as part of this Form
10-K, other than Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2, which shall be deemed
furnished.
|
|
(2)
|
All financial
statement schedules are omitted either because they are not
required, not applicable or the required information is included in
the financial statements or notes thereto.
|
56
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
WILLAMETTE VALLEY VINEYARDS, INC.
(Registrant)
(Registrant)
By:
|
/s/ James W.
Bernau
|
|
James W.
Bernau,
|
|
|
Chairperson of the Board,
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 21,
2019
|
|
57
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James W.
Bernau
|
|
Chairperson of the
Board,
|
|
March 21,
2019
|
James W.
Bernau
|
|
President
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive
Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard F. Goward
Jr.
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
March 21,
2019
|
Richard F. Goward
Jr.
|
|
(Principal
Financial
|
|
|
|
|
and Accounting
Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James L.
Ellis
|
|
Director
|
|
March 21,
2019
|
James L.
Ellis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Christopher L.
Sarles
|
|
Director
|
|
March 21,
2019
|
Christopher L.
Sarles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Craig
Smith
|
|
Director
|
|
March 21,
2019
|
Craig Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stan G.
Turel
|
|
Director
|
|
March 21,
2019
|
Stan G. Turel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Sean M.
Cary
|
|
Director
|
|
March 21,
2019
|
Sean M. Cary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Heather
Westing
|
|
Director
|
|
March 21,
2019
|
Heather
Westing
|
|
|
|
|
58