Wolverine Resources Corp. - Annual Report: 2010 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from [          ] to [          ]

Commission file number 000-53767

Wolverine Exploration Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

N/A
(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 the Securities Act.
Yes [  ]      No[x]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act
Yes [  ]      No[x]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days.
Yes[x]     No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [   ]    No [   ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
[   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [   ]     No[x]

The value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on August 30, 2010 was $10,356,150, based on a market price of $0.105 per share. For purposes of this computation, all executive officers and directors have been deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such executive officers and directors are, in fact, affiliates of the Registrant.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

98,630,000 shares of common stock issued & outstanding as of August 31, 2010

     DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3

PART I

Item 1. Business

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors” that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States Dollars and all references to “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

As used in this annual report, the terms “we”, “us”, “our company”, “Wolverine”, mean Wolverine Exploration Inc., a Nevada corporation, unless otherwise indicated.

Corporate History

Our company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on February 23, 2006 and is quoted on the OTCQB and OTCBB under the symbol WOLV.

On February 28, 2007, we entered into a vend-in agreement with Shenin Resources Inc. (“Shenin”), a private Canadian corporation, for the purchase of a 90% interest 516 mineral claims located in Labrador Canada. The purchase price paid to Shenin was $374,000 satisfied by the issuance of 34,000,000 shares of our common stock at a fair value of $0.01 per share and a note payable of $34,000. Under the terms of the vend-in agreement we are required to incur the following expenditures on the claims: (i) CDN $150,000 on or before March 1, 2008; (ii) CDN $200,000 on or before March 1, 2009, and (iii) CDN $250,000 on or before March 1, 2010; provided that (iv) any excess amount spent in one year may be carried forward and applied towards fulfillment of the expenditure required in the later year. Shenin has also granted our company a first right of refusal to purchase a 90% interest in all further property in Labrador Canada that Shenin may obtain an interest in from time to time. To date, we have incurred expenditures of $271,711.

On August 15, 2007, we registered our company as an extra-provincially registered company in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador for the purpose of being able to register the Claims in the name of our company and for the purpose of being able to conduct our business in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.

Subsequent to the vend-in agreement, Richard Haderer, a consultant of Wolverine, staked twenty-four (24) additional mineral claims on behalf of Wolverine. The staking costs for these additional claims was Cdn $1,440 and the additional claims are contiguous to the 516 claims acquired pursuant to the vend-in agreement.

On August 27, 2009 we signed an amending agreement with Shenin. which waives all of the remaining work commitments required under the vend-in agreement subject to us incurring sufficient exploration expenditures on the claims to keep them in good standing with the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.

4

In March of 2010, as a result of the exploration carried out to date, Wolverine reduced the number of claims by 128 in order to concentrate its exploration efforts on the claims with anomalous mineralization.

In June of 2010, Ed Montague, transferred 37 claims to Wolverine which had been staked on behalf of Wolverine. Wolverine now holds a 90% interest and Shenin holds a 10% interest in a total of 449 claims.

Our Current Business

We are an exploration stage company engaged in the business of acquisition and exploration of base and precious metal mineral properties. Our current exploration is focused on mineral properties located in Labrador, Canada. We have not yet determined whether the Labrador Claims contain mineral reserves that are economically recoverable.

Claims Located in Labrador, Canada

Location and Means of Access to the Claims

The Claims (the “Labrador Claims”) are located about 120 kilometres (75 miles) west of Goose Bay, Labrador, a small town of 9,000 people on the Atlantic Coast of northern Canada. It takes approximately one and a half to two hours to drive to the Labrador Claims from Goose Bay.

The Labrador Claims lie within NTS map sheets 13E/01 and 13F/04 and extends approximately from 53^o 11’ 08’’ N latitude and 62^o 11’ 56’’ W longitude to 53^o 06’ 34’’ N latitude and 61^o 57’ 02’’ W longitude.

Goose Bay features an international airport. From there, the Labrador Claims can be accessed directly from the Trans-Labrador Highway. The Labrador Claims are easily accessible by the Trans-Labrador Highway, which runs through the central portion of the Labrador Claims. The Trans-Labrador Highway is a well maintained Provincial Highway with a gravel surface. There are no gas stations between Goose Bay and Churchill Falls, the next major community located 290 kilometres (180 miles) to the west of Goose Bay and 160 kilometres (105 miles) to the west of the Labrador Claims.

Access to the Labrador Claims is possible for most of the year given the proximity to Goose Bay and the fact that the highway is well maintained. Airborne geophysical surveys are best performed either in late winter (March-April) or during the summer (June-August). Ground geophysical surveys should be scheduled to avoid freeze-up (November-December) and breakup (late April to early June). Ground geological surveys are best conducted with no snow cover (mid June to mid November)

5

Figure 1. The Claims are located approximately 120 kilometers (75 miles) west of Goose Bay, Labrador.

Description of Labrador Claims

The Labrador Claims are unencumbered and in good standing and there are no third party conditions which affect the Labrador Claims other than conditions defined by the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador described below. The Labrador Claims together make up an aggregate area of 11,225 hectares. We have no insurance covering the Labrador Claims. Management believes that no insurance is necessary since the Labrador Claims are unimproved and contain no buildings or improvements. The Labrador Claims cover an area with approximate dimensions of 20 kilometers east-west (12.5 miles) and 10 kilometers north-south (6.25 miles).

The Labrador Claims consist of a total of 449 mineral claims covering 11 separate licenses as described in Table 1 below. A layout of the Labrador Claims is shown in Figure 2 below.

6

Figure 2. The Claims extend for a distance of approximately 20 kilometers (12.5 miles) along the Trans-Labrador Highway.

There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on the Labrador Claims. Further exploration will be required before an evaluation as to the economic feasibility of the Labrador Claims is determined. Our consulting geophysicist has written a report and provided us with recommendations of how we should explore the Labrador Claims. Until management can validate otherwise, the Labrador Claims are without known reserves.

Conditions to Retain Title to the Labrador Claims

The Labrador Claims have varying expiry dates. In order to maintain the Labrador Claims in good standing it will be necessary for us to coordinate an agent to perform and record valid exploration work with value of CDN$200 per claim in anniversary year 1, CDN$250 per claim in anniversary year 2, CDN$300 per claim in anniversary year 3, CDN$350 per claim in anniversary year 4, CDN$400 per claim in anniversary year 5, CDN$600 per claim in anniversary years six to ten inclusive, CDN$900 per claim in anniversary years 11 to 15 inclusive and CDN$1,200 per claim in anniversary years 16 to 20 inclusive. Failure to perform and record valid exploration work on the anniversary dates will result in forfeiture of title to the Labrador Claims.

History of Labrador and the Labrador Claims

According to the report prepared by our consulting geophysicist, the geologic setting is based on information available from the Geological Survey of Canada (DNR Open File 013F/0055) and the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador (Open File 013F/0061). The regional geology as described by both Government Reports contains very little detail because the Trans-Labrador Highway was under construction during much of the mapping initiative, opening in 1992.

7

Also, the area has seen only limited geologic mapping on a regional scale, in part due to the remoteness of the area and the timing of the Federal and Provincial mapping initiatives that preceded construction of the Trans-Labrador Highway. The mapped geology within the area is part of a regional 1:500,000 compilation undertaken by the Newfoundland and Labrador Provincial Government during the early 1990’s. The survey area is located outside of the area of detailed mapping, in which case geologic mapping has been taken from previous publications, most notably a Federal Government regional mapping program from 1990-1994. During the period 1990 to 1994 the area was regionally mapped by the Geological Survey of Canada and by the Mines and Energy Branch of the Newfoundland and Labrador Government. Geologic mapping was performed on a very regional scale, due in part to the remoteness of the area (away from the Trans-Labrador Highway) and the lack of outcrop. In summary there is very little geological mapping within the survey area and there has never been a detailed mapping program.

In the fall of 2007 Wolverine completed an airborne survey of the Labrador Claims. The airborne survey identified 8 conductive targets that warrant ground follow-up. The most interesting response occured along four 100 metre flight lines showing an east-west strike length that occurs 200m north of the CR-11 (1.69% Cu) and CR-13 (2.17% Cu and 556 ppb Au) mineralized showings. There are also 3 higher conductance responses on the property. The magnetic field responses show east-west trends that could be associated with mineralization. The radiometrics data shows numerous uranium anomalies and some potassium responses that correspond with the EM trends (suggesting geological contacts). In general the EM responses are low amplitude and low conductance, which is consistent with copper and gold mineralization in low percent sulphide. The EM responses do not appear to be consistent with pyrrhotite-rich sulphide (iron formation) or graphite.

In the fall of 2009 Wolverine carried out geological reconnaissance along with prospecting and sampling on three of its eleven Labrador licenses. Some, but not all of the known mineralized zones were sampled as this was more of a reconnaissance exercise until a more systematic program is put in place. In addition, to the usual base metal sampling, scintillometer surveys were done on the exposed rock cuts along the highway and selected areas of the southern portions of the three licenses.

Activation Laboratories (ActLab) based in Ancaster, ON, carried out mineral analysis of the Wolverine samples which included uranium content. Results indicate that there are significant copper values in three of the samples as outlined in the table below. Elevated values in gold, zinc and rare earth elements along with minor silver, cobalt and chromium are also found associated with those samples. It appears that all of these elements are associated with the copper-bearing malachite that intrudes both the regional gneisses and the younger pegmatite dikes. Malachite is sometimes associated with near surface copper deposits and it appears here, that the copper bearing solutions that permeated up through fractures or weak areas of the gneisses contained percentages of the other potentially economic minerals.

The radiometric data shows numerous uranium anomalies and some potassium responses that correspond with the EM trends (suggesting geological contacts), There is a significant east-west trending radioactive anomaly that is in excess of two kilometres in length in the southern portion of the licenses. This has yet to be explored.

8

Scientillometer reading exceeds 1200 cps in some of the rock cuts along the highway which is moderately high. It should be noted that Aurora Energy’s giant Michelin deposit in Labrador’s Central Mineral Belt has an average grade of only 0.09% U3O8.

Work on the Property during June of 2010 consisted of prospecting, sampling and geological reconnaissance on and around electro-magnetic and radiometric anomalies that were identified during the 2007 airborne survey. Earlier sampling on rock cuts along the highway had shown significant values in Cu and Au that warranted further exploration. To date a total of 94 rock samples have been collected and sent to a laboratory for ICP-30 elements and Au analysis. Results have been received which indicates that several areas have elevated levels of Cu with minor Au, Pb and Zn.

The strongest anomalous area (Sample CR-11;-1.69 % Cu) was traced southwest for over a strike length of 100 meters (328 ft) in bedrock when excessive overburden prevented further examination of the zone. This exploration will be continued utilizing an excavator. The northern center of this anomaly is directly on strike, 250 meters (820 ft) from the sample site indicating a possible continuation of the zone to the north. This is scheduled for the diamond drill as the marshy area is considered unfit for trenching.

A second anomalous area that is of considerable interest to Wolverine lies one kilometer to the east (Sample RS-04-02, 2.17% Cu and 556 ppb Au) could not be traced further than the rock cut due to overburden thickness.

Continued prospecting during July 2010 on other areas of the property has revealed additional outcrops containing malachite alteration on the western end of the property near anomaly number one with assays of up to 5.1% Cu. This sample was taken within 300 metres of a previous sample which had an assay of 6.4% Cu.

Present Condition of the Labrador Claims

The mineralization found to date on the Labrador Claims consists primarily of copper and gold mineralization in sulphide with associated pyrite (a non-economic sulphide mineral). There are also a number of malachite veins (and malachite stained outcrops).

The country rocks have been identified as meta-sedimentary gneiss. Locally gabbros and diorites have been identified by surface prospecting.

Based on the mineralization and the known geologic rock types, there appear to be three possible deposit types that could host mineralization within the Labrador Claims; 1) porphyry copper-gold in sulphide, 2) volcanogenic (Cu-Pb-Zn) massive sulphide, or 3) magmatic nickel-copper sulphide.

Copper-gold (Cu-Au) deposits occur within sedimentary rocks when a stock intrudes into the sediments and heats up the ground water. The heated fluids pick up copper and other metals as they percolate through fractures opened up within the sediments. Mineralization is mostly disseminated, but significant veins of chalcopyrite, rich in gold, are also present. The presence of chalcopyrite in meta-sediment and malchite staining are excellent indicators for a copper-gold system.

VMS deposits are commonly formed by deposition of hot metals into seawater from volcanic vents on the seafloor. The main metals include copper, zinc, lead, gold and silver. Within the Labrador Claims there are no mapped volcanic rocks, although the known mineralization has been found within gabbro and diorite.

Magmatic nickel-copper sulphide deposits are hosted in mafic to ultramafic rocks such as gabbro, norite, and troctolite. Other rock types commonly associated with these host rocks are diorites and anorthosites. Within the Labrador Claims chalcopyrite mineralization was identified in a gabbro and separately associated with a diorite dyke.

The Labrador Claims are almost completely covered by overburden and tree cover. Rock outcrops are best observed along the highway where they have been uncovered.

9

The climate within the area is typically northern with short hot summers and long cold winters. Winter temperatures can range from -15^o C to -35^o C and occasionally fall to below -42^o C.

There is no equipment, infrastructure or electricity currently on the Labrador Claims.

There have been no previous airborne surveys in this area that are within 35 kilometers (22 miles) of the Labrador Claims. The area would have been covered as part of the Federal Government regional airborne magnetic survey, but this survey would not have the sufficient resolution to identify magnetic units less than 1 kilometer in size and could not detect any conductive mineralization.

Geology of the Labrador Claims

Geologically the area is mapped as early to late Proterozoic meta-sediments that have been metamorphosed to gneisses. Major gabbroic and anorthositic intrusives have intruded the gneisses several kilometers to the east and local gabbros and diorites occur throughout the area along with several quartz veins. Large tourmaline crystals have also been identified on the Labrador Claims. The area has little outcrop and is covered by overburden, generally sand and gravel. Spruces trees are abundant but are not very tall.

The presence of several copper showings and malachite staining in the limited outcrop suggests that a mineralizing event of copper and gold has intruded into the meta-sedimentary rocks. The nature of the mineralization is likely to be copper veins and disseminations with associated gold. It is also possible that magmatic nickel and copper mineralization could be present with associated platinum group elements within gabbros.

Competition

The mining industry is intensely competitive. We compete with numerous individuals and companies, including many major mining companies, which have substantially greater technical, financial and operational resources and staffs. Accordingly, there is a high degree of competition for access to funds. There are other competitors that have operations in the area and the presence of these competitors could adversely affect our ability to compete for financing and obtain the service providers, staff or equipment necessary for the exploration and exploitation of our properties.

Compliance with Government Regulation

Mining operations and exploration activities are subject to various national, state, provincial and local laws and regulations in Canada and the United States, as well as other jurisdictions, which govern prospecting, development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, protection of the environment, mine safety, hazardous substances and other matters.

We believe that we are and will continue to be in compliance in all material respects with applicable statutes and the regulations passed in Canada and the United States. There are no current orders or directions relating to our company with respect to the foregoing laws and regulations.

Employees

Currently we do not have only one employee, the project geologist, Ed Montague. The Company utilizes consultants for the management, regulatory, administrative, investor relations and some geological functions of the Company. We do not expect any material changes in the number of employees over the next 12 month period. We will continue to retain consultants as required.

Going Concern

We anticipate that additional funding will be required in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock. At this time, we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock or through a loan from our directors to meet our obligations over the next twelve months. We do not have any arrangements in place for any future equity financing.

10

Subsidiaries

We do not have any subsidiaries.

Intellectual Property

We do not own, either legally or beneficially, any patent or trademark.

REPORTS TO SECURITY HOLDERS

We are not required to deliver an annual report to our stockholders but will voluntarily send an annual report, together with our annual audited financial statements upon request. We are required to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements, and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Securities and Exchange Commission filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov.

The public may read and copy any materials filed by us with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We are an electronic filer. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The Internet address of the site is http://www.sec.gov.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Much of the information included in this annual report includes or is based upon estimates, projections or other “forward looking statements”. Such forward looking statements include any projections and estimates made by us and our management in connection with our business operations. While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein.

Such estimates, projections or other “forward looking statements” involve various risks and uncertainties as outlined below. We caution the reader that important factors in some cases have affected and, in the future, could materially affect actual results and cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in any such estimates, projections or other “forward looking statements”.

If we do not obtain additional financing, the business plan will fail.

Our current operating funds are insufficient to complete the next phases of our proposed exploration program on our Labrador mineral claims. We will need to obtain additional financing in order to complete our business plan and our proposed exploration program. Our business plan calls for significant expenses in connection with the exploration of the Labrador Claims. We have not made arrangements to secure any additional financing.

Because we have only recently commenced business operations, we face a high risk of business failure and this could result in a total loss of your investment.

We recently begun the initial stages of exploration of the Labrador Claims, and thus has no way to evaluate the likelihood whether our company will be able to operate our business successfully. Our Company was incorporated on February 23, 2006 and to date we have been involved primarily in organizational activities, obtaining financing and preliminary exploration of the Labrador Claims. We have not earned any revenues and we have never achieved profitability as of the date of this annual report. Potential investors should be aware of the difficulties normally encountered by new mineral exploration companies and the high rate of failure of such enterprises. The likelihood of success must be considered in the light of problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays encountered in connection with the exploration of the mineral properties that our company plans to undertake. These potential problems include, but are not limited to, unanticipated problems relating to exploration and additional costs and expenses that may exceed current estimates. We have no history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood that its business will prove successful, and we can provide no assurance to investors that our company will generate any operating revenues or ever achieve profitable operations. If our company is unsuccessful in addressing these risks its business will likely fail and you will lose your entire investment in this offering.

11

Because our company has only recently commenced business operations, we expect to incur operating losses for the foreseeable future.

Our company has never earned any revenue and our company has never been profitable. Prior to completing exploration on the Labrador Claims, we may incur increased operating expenses without realizing any revenues from the Labrador Claims, this could cause our company to fail and you will lose your entire investment in this offering.

If we do not find a joint venture partner for the continued development of our mineral claims, we may not be able to advance exploration work.

If the results of the exploration program are successful, we may try to enter into a joint venture agreement with a partner for the further exploration and possible production of the Labrador Claims. Our company would face competition from other junior mineral resource exploration companies who have properties that they deem to be attractive in terms of potential return and investment cost. In addition, if our company entered into a joint venture agreement, our company would likely assign a percentage of our interest in the Labrador Claims to the joint venture partner. If our company is unable to enter into a joint venture agreement with a partner, our company may fail and you may lose your entire investment in this offering.

Because of the speculative nature of mineral property exploration, there is substantial risk that no commercially viable deposits will be found and our business will fail.

Exploration for base and precious metals is a speculative venture involving substantial risk. We can provide investors with no assurance that the Labrador Claims contain commercially viable mineral deposits. The exploration program that our company will conduct on the Labrador Claims may not result in the discovery of commercial viable mineral deposits. Problems such as unusual and unexpected rock formations and other conditions are involved in base and precious metal exploration and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts. In such a case, we may be unable to complete our business plan and you could lose your entire investment.

Because of the inherent dangers involved in base and precious metal exploration, there is a risk that our company may incur liability or damages as we conducts our business.

The search for base and precious metals involves numerous hazards. As a result, our company may become subject to liability for such hazards, including pollution, cave-ins and other hazards against which we cannot insure or against which we may elect not to insure. Our company currently has no such insurance nor do we expect to get such insurance in the foreseeable future. If a hazard were to occur, the costs of rectifying the hazard may exceed our asset value and cause our company to liquidate all of our assets resulting in the loss of your entire investment.

Because access to our company’s mineral claims is often restricted by inclement weather, we will be delayed in exploration and any future mining efforts.

Access to the Labrador mineral claims is restricted to the period between May and November of each year due to snow in the area. As a result, any attempts to visit, test, or explore the property are largely limited to these few months of the year when weather permits such activities. These limitations can result in significant delays in exploration efforts, as well as mining and production in the event that commercial amounts of minerals are found. Such delays can result in our company’s inability to meet deadlines for exploration expenditures as defined by the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador. This could cause the business venture to fail and the loss of your entire investment unless our company can meet the deadlines.

12

As our company undertakes exploration of the Labrador Claims, we will be subject to compliance with government regulation that may increase the anticipated time and cost of its exploration program.

There are several governmental regulations that materially restrict the exploration of minerals. Our company will be subject to the mining laws and regulations as contained in the Mineral Act of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador as we carry out our exploration program. We may be required to obtain work permits, post bonds and perform remediation work for any physical disturbance to the land in order to comply with these regulations. While our company’s planned exploration program budgets for regulatory compliance, there is a risk that new regulations could increase our time and costs of doing business and prevent our company from carrying out our exploration program.

Because market factors in the mining business are out of our control, our company may not be able to market any minerals that may be found.

The mining industry, in general, is intensely competitive and we can provide no assurance to investors even if minerals are discovered that a ready market will exist from the sale of any base or precious metals found. Numerous factors beyond our control may affect the marketability of base or precious metals. These factors include market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of natural resource markets and processing equipment, government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in our company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital and you may lose your entire investment.

Because our company holds a significant portion of our cash reserves in United States dollars, we may experience weakened purchasing power in Canadian dollar terms.

Our company holds a significant portion of our cash reserves in United States dollars. Due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, the value of these United States dollar reserves can result in both translation gains or losses in Canadian dollar terms. If there was to be a significant decline in the United States dollar versus the Canadian Dollar, our US dollar purchasing power in Canadian dollars would also significantly decline. Our company has not entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations.

Our auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that our company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the May 31, 2010 financial statements, our company was incorporated on February 23, 2006, and does not have a history of earnings, and as a result, our company’s auditor have expressed substantial doubt about the ability of our company to continue as a going concern. Continued operations are dependent on our ability to complete equity or debt financings or generate profitable operations. Such financings may not be available or may not be available on reasonable terms. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Our stock is a penny stock. Trading of our stock may be restricted by the SEC’s penny stock regulations which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

Our stock is a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

13

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

We do not own any real property. Our principal business offices are located at 4055 McLean Road, Quesnel, British Columbia Canada V2J 6V5. Our office space is currently provided by a relative of a director of our company at a no cost. We believe that our current lease arrangements provide adequate space for our foreseeable future needs. In addition, Cdn $1,000 per month is paid to Texada Consulting Inc. for an administrative office located in Richmond, BC.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Other than as set out below, our company is not a party to any pending legal proceeding and no legal proceeding is contemplated or threatened as of the date of this annual report.

Item 4. Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There were no matters submitted to a vote of our security holders either through solicitation of proxies or otherwise in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Public Market for Common Stock

Our stock is quoted on the OTCQB and OTCBB under the symbol WOLV.

Stockholders of Our Common Shares

As of the date of this annual report, we have 158 registered shareholders.

Stock Option Grants

On May 28, 2010, we granted stock options to our officer and director, and five consultants, pursuant to our 2010 Stock Plan, to purchase up to an aggregate of 5,100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.14 per share, exercisable until May 28, 2015. We issued the stock options to six (6) non-U.S. persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933), in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

14

Warrants

We have not issued and do not have outstanding any warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.

Dividends

There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that prevent us from declaring dividends. The Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where, after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:

We have not declared any dividends, and we do not plan to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

On May 28, 2010 our directors approved the adoption of our 2010 Stock Plan which permits our company to issue up to 5,147,250 shares of our common stock, and 5,147,250 options to acquire shares of common stock, to directors, officers, employees and consultants of our company upon the grant of stock or the exercise of stock options granted under the 2010 Plan.

Transfer Agent

Our common shares are issued in registered form. Empire Stock Transfer, Inc. Telephone: (702) 818-5898; Facsimile: (702) 974-1444 is the registrar and transfer agent for our common shares.

On August 25, 2010, the list of stockholders for our shares of common stock showed 158 registered stockholders and 98,630,000 shares of common stock outstanding.

Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

On February 9, 2010 our President Lee Costerd acquired 300,000 common shares at a fair value of $0.03 per share in settlement of outstanding debt in the amount of $9,000.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Effective June 23, 2009, we issued 1,500,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $45,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective August 17, 2009, we issued 150,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $4,500. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective September 9, 2009, we issued 500,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $15,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

15

Effective October 2, 2009, we issued 500,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $15,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective October 23, 2009, we issued 550,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $16,500. We have issued all of the shares to two non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective November 30, 2009, we issued 500,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $15,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective December 7, 2009, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $30,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective December 7, 2009, we issued 700,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to debt settlement agreements with two individuals. The fair value of the shares issued was $0.03 per share. We have issued all of the shares to two non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective December 9, 2009, we issued 400,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to debt settlement agreements with one individual. The fair value of the shares issued was $0.03 per share. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective December 14, 2009, we issued 400,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to debt settlement agreements with one individual. The fair value of the shares issued was $0.04 per share. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective December 29, 2009, we issued 250,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $7,500. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective December 29, 2009, we issued 400,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $12,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective January 11, 2010, we issued 250,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $7,500. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective January 14, 2010, we issued 200,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $6,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

16

Effective January 26, 2010, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $3,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective January 27, 2010, we issued 400,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to debt settlement agreements with two individuals. The fair value of the shares issued was $0.05 per share. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective February 9, 2010, we issued 300,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to debt settlement agreements with one individual. The fair value of the shares issued was $0.05 per share. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 10, 2010, we issued 5,850,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to debt settlement agreements with twenty individuals. The fair value of the shares issued was $266,425. We have issued all of the shares to non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective March 31, 2010, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $3,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective April 15, 2010, we issued 2,000,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $60,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective April 29, 2010, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $3,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 14, 2010, we issued 300,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $9,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 17, 2010, we issued 600,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $18,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 19, 2010, we issued 300,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $9,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 21, 2010, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $3,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

17

Effective May 24, 2010, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $3,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 25, 2010, we issued 800,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $24,000. We have issued all of the shares to three non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 25, 2010, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $3,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 26, 2010, we issued 600,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $18,000. We have issued all of the shares to three non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 26, 2010, we issued 300,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $9,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 27, 2010, we issued 200,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $6,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 27, 2010, we issued 200,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $6,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 28, 2010, we issued 1,400,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $42,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 28, 2010, we issued 300,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $9,000. We have issued all of the shares to two non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 29, 2010, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $3,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective May 31, 2010, we issued 200,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $6,000. We have issued all of the shares to two non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

18

Effective June 1, 2010, we issued 200,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $6,000. We have issued all of the shares to two non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 2, 2010, we issued 500,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $15,000. We have issued all of the shares to four non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 3, 2010, we issued 700,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $21,000. We have issued all of the shares to three non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 4 2010, we issued 250,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $7,500. We have issued all of the shares to two non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 4, 2010, we issued 300,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $9,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 7, 2010, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $3,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 8, 2010, we issued 800,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $24,000. We have issued all of the shares to four non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 10, 2010, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $3,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 11, 2010, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $3,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 14, 2010, we issued 400,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $12,000. We have issued all of the shares to three non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 15, 2010, we issued 1,300,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $39,000. We have issued all of the shares to three non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

19

Effective June 17, 2010, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $30,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 18, 2010, we issued 300,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $9,000. We have issued all of the shares to one non-US person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 23, 2010, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $3,000. We have issued all of securities to one U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) relying upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 25, 2010, we issued 1,200,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $36,000. We have issued all of the shares to five non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Effective June 30, 2010, we issued 600,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.03 raising gross proceeds of $18,000. We have issued all of the shares to four non-US persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during our fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended May 31, 2010.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the related notes for the years ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009 that appear elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report, particularly in the section entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page 11 of this annual report.

Our audited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Cash Requirements

There is limited historical financial information about us upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. We are an exploration stage company and have not generated any revenues from activities. We cannot guarantee we will be successful in our business activities. Our business is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including limited capital resources, possible delays in the exploration of our properties, and possible cost overruns due to price and cost increases in services.

20

Over the next twelve months we intend to use any funds that we may have available to fund our operations and conduct exploration on our Labrador Claims. We expect to review other potential exploration projects from time to time as they are presented to us.

Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion for our year ended May 31, 2010. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until we begin removing and selling minerals. As we had cash in the amount of $96,712 and a working capital deficit in the amount of $52,030 as of May 31, 2010, we do not have sufficient working capital to enable us to carry out our stated plan of operation for the next twelve months. We plan to complete debt financings and/or private placement sales of our common stock in order to raise the funds necessary to pursue our plan of operation and to fund our working capital deficit in order to enable us to pay our accounts payable and accrued liabilities. We currently do not have any arrangements in place for the completion of any debt financings or private placement financings and there is no assurance that we will be successful in completing any debt financing or private placement financing. Our success or failure will be determined by what we find under the ground.

Exploration Plan

Wolverine is currently conducting a drill program on its Labrador Claims. Upon completion of the drill program we will disclose our exploration plan for the next 12 months.

As at May 31, 2010, we had a cash balance of $96,712. We will need to raise additional financing to fund our exploration program over the next 12 months.

The continuation of our business is dependent upon obtaining further financing, a successful program of exploration and/or development, and, finally, achieving a profitable level of operations. The issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

There are no assurances that we will be able to obtain further funds required for our continued operations. As noted herein, we are pursuing various financing alternatives to meet our immediate and long-term financial requirements. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, we will be unable to conduct our operations as planned, and we will not be able to meet our other obligations as they become due. In such event, we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease our operations.

Purchase of Significant Equipment

We do intend to purchase any significant equipment over the twelve months ending May 31, 2011.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended May 31, 2010 and 2009

The following summary of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009.

Our operating results for the years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows:

21

Operating expenses include stock-based compensation expense of $746,277.

Revenues

We have not earned any revenues since our inception and we do not anticipate earning revenues in the near future.

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses for the year ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009 are outlined in the table below:

The increase in operating expenses comprised of general and administrative expenses and mineral exploration costs, for the year ended May 31, 2010, compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, was mainly due to stock-based compensation expense arising from the granting of stock options during the year. There was no write-down of mineral property costs during the year ended May 31, 2010.

Cash Flows

22

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities during the year ended May 31, 2010, was $262,836 compared to $56,643 during the year ended May 31, 2009.

Investing Activities

We did not have any investing activities during the years ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009.

Financing Activities

During the year ended May 31, 2010, we received net proceeds of $366,875 from share subscriptions; proceeds form a loan payable of $7,000 and repaid a loan in the amount of $15,000. During the year ended May 31, 2009, we received a $36,000 loan.

Contractual Obligations

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide tabular disclosure obligations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our audited financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles used in the United States. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management's application of accounting policies. We believe that understanding the basis and nature of the estimates and assumptions involved with the following aspects of our financial statements is critical to an understanding of our financials.

Mineral Property Costs

Our company has been in the exploration stage since its inception on February 23, 2006 and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations. It is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties. Mineral property exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Mineral property acquisition costs are initially capitalized when incurred. Our company assesses the carrying costs for impairment under ASC 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment.”at each fiscal quarter end. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs then incurred to develop such property, are capitalized. Such costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable reserve. If mineral properties are subsequently abandoned or impaired, any capitalized costs will be charged to operations.

Long-lived Assets

In accordance with ASC 360, ”Property, Plant, and Equipment”, our company tests long-lived assets or asset groups for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Circumstances which could trigger a review include, but are not limited to: significant decreases in the market price of the asset; significant adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of the asset; current period cash flow or operating losses combined with a history of losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset; and current expectation that the asset will more likely than not be sold or disposed significantly before the end of its estimated useful life. Recoverability is assessed based on the carrying amount of the asset and its fair value which is generally determined based on the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and the eventual disposal of the asset, as well as specific appraisal in certain instances. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds fair value.

23

Stock-based Compensation

Our company records stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, “Share Based Payments”, using the fair value method. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASC 855, Subsequent Events, which establishes general standards of for the evaluation, recognition and disclosure of events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. Although there is new terminology, the standard is based on the same principles as those that currently exist in the auditing standards. The standard, which includes a new required disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events, is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

statements in conformity with US GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC. ASC 105 does not change current US GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative US GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, but did eliminate all references to pre-codification standards.

In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. This standard also provides further guidance on how to determine a separate unit of accounting in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard will be adopted on June 1, 2011 but is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure”, to require reporting entities to separately disclose the amounts and business rationale for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and separately present information regarding purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures on a gross basis. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of disclosures regarding the beginning after December 15, 2010.

In March 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-11 (ASU 2010-11), “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives”. The amendments in this update are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after issuance of this update. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-11 to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

24

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Our audited financial statements are stated in United States dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

The following audited financial statements are filed as part of this annual report:

25

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Wolverine Exploration Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Wolverine Exploration Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company) as of May 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended and accumulated from June 1, 2008 to May 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of May 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and accumulated from June 1, 2008 to May 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has not generated any revenues, has a working capital deficit, and has incurred operating losses since inception. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ SATURNA GROUP CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS LLP

Saturna Group Chartered Accountants LLP

Vancouver, Canada

August 26, 2010 

F-1

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

F-2

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

F-3

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

F-4

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

F-5

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

F-6

F-7

F-8

Level 1

Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3

Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, amounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, loans payable, and amount due to a related party. Pursuant to ASC 820, the fair value of cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The recorded values of all other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.

F-9

In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. This standard also provides further guidance on how to determine a separate unit of accounting in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard will be adopted on June 1, 2011 but is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure”, to require reporting entities to separately disclose the amounts and business rationale for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and separately present information regarding purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures on a gross basis. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of disclosures regarding the beginning after December 15, 2010.

In March 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-11 (ASU 2010-11), “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives”. The amendments in this update are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after issuance of this update. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-11 to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

F-10

Subsequent to the vend-in agreement, the Company acquired an additional 24 mineral claims contiguous to the 516 claims acquired pursuant to the vend-in agreement described above for $501. Pursuant to the vend-in agreement, the Company has a 90% interest in these additional 24 mineral claims and the optionor has a 10% interest.

On March 16, 2010, the Company relinquished its interest in 128 of the mineral claims described above.

F-11

F-12

The significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities at May 31, 2010 and 2009, are as follows:

F-13

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

There were no disagreements related to accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, internal controls or auditing scope or procedure during the two fiscal years and interim periods.

Item 9A (T). Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

As at May 31, 2010, the end of the year covered by this annual report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended May 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This annual report does not include a report of management's assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.

Material Weaknesses Identified

Based on our management’s evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 and of Rule 15d-15 of the Exchange Act, certain significant deficiencies in internal control became evident to management that our management believes represent material weaknesses, including:

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (2), (3) and (4) above did not have an affect on our financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures can result in our detriment to our financial statements for the future years.

26

We are committed to improving our financial organization. As part of this commitment, we intend to create a position when funds are available to us to segregate duties consistent with control objectives and will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function: i) appointing one or more outside directors to our board of directors who will also be appointed to the audit committee of our company resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; and ii) preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists that will set forth procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements.

Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who will also be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors. In addition, management believes that preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists will remedy the following material weaknesses: (i) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and (ii) ineffective controls over period end financial close and reporting processes. Further, management believes that the hiring of additional personnel who have the technical expertise and knowledge will result proper segregation of duties and provide more checks and balances within the department. Additional personnel will also provide the cross training needed to support our company if personnel turn over issues within the department occur. This coupled with the appointment of additional outside directors will greatly decrease any control and procedure issues we may encounter in the future.

Management will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and are committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds allow.

Inherent limitations on effectiveness of controls

Internal control over financial reporting has inherent limitations which include but is not limited to the use of independent professionals for advice and guidance, interpretation of existing and/or changing rules and principles, segregation of management duties, scale of organization, and personnel factors. Internal control over financial reporting is a process which involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis, however these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process and it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

27

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

All of the directors of our company hold office until the next annual meeting of the stockholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office. Our directors and executive officers, their ages, positions held, and duration as such, are as follows:

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of each director and executive officer during at least the past five years, indicating each person's principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which he was employed.

Lee Costerd

Mr. Costerd has acted as Wolverine’s sole Director and Officer since its inception on February 23, 2006. Mr. Costerd has been involved in the mining industry for the past 20 years. Mr. Costerd was the mine manager for a placer mining operation in British Columbia and a supervisor at a hard rock mining operation also in British Columbia.

Luke Rich

Mr. Rich is a member of the Innu Nation and Mushuau Innu First Nations and is a former VP of the Innu Nation. Prior to joining Wolverine, Mr. Rich was also Co-CEO of the Innu Development Limited Partnership (“IDLP”) from October 2007 to April 2010. IDLP participated in the construction of the mine and mill for the Voisey Bay Nickel Project. Mr. Rich is also a board member of various IDLP owned companies including Innu Mikun Airlines, Innu Keiwit Constructor LP and the Innu/SNC Lavalin Partnership.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors or officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Our directors, executive officers and control persons have not been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:

1. any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

2. any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);

28

3. being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

4. being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common stock and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal year ended May 31, 2010, all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% percent beneficial owners were complied with.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

We do not have an audit committee; our entire board of directors performs the function of an audit committee. Our board of directors has determined that it does not have a member that qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, and is "independent" as the term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

We believe that the members of our board of directors are collectively capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an "audit committee financial expert" would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated any material revenues to date. In addition, we currently do not have nominating, compensation or audit committees or committees performing similar functions nor do we have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our board of directors does not believe that it is necessary to have such committees because it believes the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by our board of directors.

Code of Ethics

We adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to all of our directors, officers, employees and consultants, which is a "code of ethics" as defined by applicable rules of the SEC. Our Code of Ethics is attached as an exhibit to our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on July 15, 2008. If we make any amendments to our Code of Ethics other than technical, administrative, or other non-substantive amendments, or grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of our Code of Ethics to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, or certain other finance executives, we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date and to whom it applies in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The particulars of the compensation paid to the following persons:

• our principal executive officer;

• each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009; and

29

• up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009,

who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers of our company, are set out in the following summary compensation table, except that no disclosure is provided for any named executive officer, other than our principal executive officers, whose total compensation did not exceed $100,000 for the respective fiscal year:

Stock Options/SAR Grants

During the period from inception (February 23, 2006) to May 31, 2010, we granted 1,100,000 stock options options with an exercise price of $0.14 per share and an expiry date of May 28, 2015 to our executive officers.

Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Values

There were no options exercised during our fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 or May 31, 2009 by any officer or director of our company.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

No equity awards were outstanding as of the year ended May 31, 2010.

Compensation of Directors

We reimburse our directors for expenses incurred in connection with attending board meetings. We have not paid any director's fees or other cash compensation for services rendered as a director since our inception to May 31, 2010.

We have no formal plan for compensating our directors for their service in their capacity as directors, although such directors are expected in the future to receive stock options to purchase common shares as awarded by our board of directors or (as to future stock options) a compensation committee which may be established. Directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our board of directors. Our board of directors may award special remuneration to any director undertaking any special services on our behalf other than services ordinarily required of a director. No director received and/or accrued any compensation for their services as a director, including committee participation and/or special assignments.

30

Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements

We have not entered into any employment agreement or consulting agreement with our directors and executive officers.

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. Our directors and executive officers may receive stock options at the discretion of our board of directors in the future. We do not have any material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of our board of directors.

We have no plans or arrangements with respect to remuneration received or that may be received by our executive officers to compensate such officers in the event of termination of employment (as a result of resignation, retirement, change of control) or a change of responsibilities following a change of control, where the value of such compensation exceeds $60,000 per executive officer.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of August 30, 2010, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock and by each of our current directors and executive officers. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated.

31

Changes in Control

We are unaware of any contract or other arrangement or provisions of our Articles or Bylaws the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company. There are not any provisions in our Articles or Bylaws, the operation of which would delay, defer, or prevent a change in control of our company.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Except as disclosed herein, there have been no transactions or proposed transactions in which the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last three completed fiscal years in which any of our directors, executive officers or beneficial holders of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, or any of their respective relatives, spouses, associates or affiliates, has had or will have any direct or material indirect interest.

Director Independence

We currently act with two directors, Mr. Lee Costerd and Mr. Luke Rich. We have determined that we do not have a director that qualifies as an “independent director” as defined in NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15).

We do not have a standing audit, compensation or nominating committee, but our entire board of directors act in such capacity. We believe that our directors are capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. Our directors do not believe that it is necessary to have an audit committee because we believe that the functions of an audit committee can be adequately performed by the board of directors. In addition, we believe that retaining additional independent directors who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development.

Item 14. Principal Accountants Fees and Services

The aggregate fees billed for the most recently completed fiscal years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 and for fiscal year ended May 31, 2009 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for these fiscal periods were as follows:

32

Our board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

Our board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by our independent auditors and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining our independent auditors’ independence.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K

33

*Filed herewith.

34

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

35