Wright Investors Service Holdings, Inc. - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
For the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
For the
transition period from ________ to _______
Commission
file Number: 000-50587
NATIONAL
PATENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
|
13-4005439
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
IRS
Employer Identification Number)
|
903
Murray Road, PO Box 1960
East Hanover NJ 07936
|
||
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)
|
(973)
428-4600
|
||
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
None
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
|
Common
Stock, $0.01 Par Value
|
|
(Title
of Class)
|
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of
delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part
III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer
|
o |
Accelerated
filer
|
o |
Non-accelerated
filer
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
o |
Smaller
reporting company
|
x |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The aggregate market value of the
registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by
reference to the price at which the common stock was last sold, or the average
bid and asked price of such common stock, as of the last business day of the
registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, is $ 35,534,000.
As of
March 13, 2009, 17,545,838 shares of the registrant’s common stock were
outstanding.
Portions
of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2009 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this
report.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
||||||||
PART
I
|
||||||||
1
|
||||||||
7
|
||||||||
9
|
||||||||
9
|
||||||||
10
|
||||||||
10
|
||||||||
PART
II
|
||||||||
11
|
||||||||
12
|
||||||||
12
|
||||||||
22
|
||||||||
23
|
||||||||
52
|
||||||||
52
|
||||||||
53
|
||||||||
PART
III
|
||||||||
53
|
||||||||
53
|
||||||||
53
|
||||||||
54
|
||||||||
54
|
||||||||
PART
IV
|
||||||||
55
|
||||||||
56
|
i
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward looking statements. Forward-looking
statements are not statements of historical facts, but rather reflect our
current expectations concerning future events and results. The words “may,”
“will,” “anticipate,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “could,”
“project,” “predict,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” and “intend,” as well as
other similar words and expressions of the future, are intended to identify
forward-looking statements.
These
forward-looking statements generally relate to our plans, objectives and
expectations for future events and include statements about our expectations,
beliefs, plans, objectives, intentions, assumptions and other statements that
are not historical facts. These statements are based upon our opinions and
estimates as of the date they are made. Although we believe that the
expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such
forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and
uncertainties that may be beyond our control, which could cause actual results,
performance and achievements to differ materially from results, performance and
achievements projected, expected, expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. While we cannot assess the future impact that any of these
differences could have on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows or the market price of shares of our common stock, the
differences could be significant. You are cautioned not to unduly rely on such
forward-looking statements when evaluating the information presented in this
report.
Factors
that may cause actual results to differ from historical results or those results
expressed or implied, include, but are not limited to, those listed below under
Item 1A. “Risk Factors”, an unexpected decline in revenue and/or net income
derived by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Five Star Products, Inc., due to the
loss of business from significant customers or otherwise. In addition, Five Star
Products, Inc. is subject to the intense competition in the do-it-yourself
industry. Although we have taken certain steps to mitigate any negative effect
of the aforementioned items, significant unfavorable changes could severely
impact the assumptions used and have an adverse effect on
profitability.
Additional
information concerning the factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in Item 1.
“Business”, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations”, and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and
in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”). We undertake no obligation to publicly revise any
forward-looking statements or cautionary factors, except as required by
law.
PART
I
Item
1. Business
General
Development of Business
National
Patent Development Corporation (the “Company”, “we” or “us”) was incorporated on
March 10, 1998 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of GP Strategies Corporation (“GP
Strategies”). The Company common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and
is traded under the symbol “NPDV.OB”.
1
On July
30, 2004, GP Strategies contributed its ownership interests in its optical
plastics and home improvement distribution businesses, as well as other non-core
assets, to the Company in exchange for common stock of the Company. The
separation of these businesses was accomplished through a pro-rata distribution
(the “Distribution” or “Spin-off”) of 100% of the outstanding common stock of
the Company to the stockholders of GP Strategies on November 18, 2004, the
record date of the Distribution. On November 24, 2004, holders of record
received one share of Company common stock for each share of GP Strategies
common stock or Class B capital stock owned.
The
Company owns the home improvement distribution business through its wholly owned
subsidiary Five Star Products, Inc. (“Five Star”) and also owns certain other
non-core assets, primarily consisting of certain real estate. The operations of
the optical plastics business were held in the Company’s wholly-owned
subsidiary, MXL Industries, Inc (“MXL Industries”) and disposed off in June
2008.
On June
19, 2008, pursuant to the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of June
16, 2008, by and among the Company, MXL Industries (the “MXL Industries” or the
“Seller”), MXL Operations, Inc. (“MXL Operations”), MXL Leasing, LP (“MXL
Leasing”) and MXL Realty, LP (“MXL Realty” and, collectively with MXL Operations
and MXL Leasing, the “MXL Buyers”), the MXL Buyers purchased substantially
all the assets and assumed certain liabilities of the Seller’s optical
plastics molding and precision coating businesses (the “MXL
Business”). As consideration, MXL Industries received approximately
$5,200,000 in cash, of which approximately $2,200,000 was utilized to fully pay
bank debt of MXL Industries. The sale resulted in a gain of $87,000,
net of $143,000 of related expenses. MXL Industries also made an
aggregate investment in the MXL Buyers of $275,000, allocated to each of MXL
Operations, MXL Leasing and MXL Realty in a manner so that as of the effective
time of the transaction, the Company has a 19.9% interest in MXL
Operations.
On June
26, 2008, pursuant to the terms of a tender offer and merger agreement (the
“Tender Offer Agreement”), among the Company, Five Star and NPDV Acquisition
Corp., a newly-formed wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“NPDV”), NPDV
commenced a tender offer to acquire all the outstanding shares of Five Star
common stock not held by the Company or NPDV at a purchase price of $0.40 per
share, net to the seller in cash, without interest thereon and less any required
withholding taxes. The tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) closed on
August 26, 2008, and on August 28, 2008, NPDV merged with and into Five Star,
with Five Star continuing as the surviving corporation, wholly-owned by the
Company (the “NPDV-Five Star Merger”).
Five
Star Products
General
Five Star
is engaged in the wholesale distribution of home decorating, hardware and
finishing products. It serves over 3,500 independent retail dealers in 12
states, making Five Star one of the largest distributors of its kind in the
Northeast. Five Star operates two distribution centers, located in Newington,
Connecticut and East Hanover, New Jersey. All operations are coordinated from
Five Star’s New Jersey headquarters.
Five Star
offers products from leading manufacturers such as Valspar/Cabot Stain, William
Zinsser & Company, DAP Inc., General Electric Corporation, American Tool,
USG Corporation, Stanley Tools, Minwax and 3M Company. Five Star distributes its
products to retail dealers, which include lumber yards, “do-it-yourself”
centers, hardware stores and paint stores principally in the northeast region.
It carries an extensive inventory of the products it distributes and provides
delivery, generally within 24 to 72 hours. Five Star has grown to be one of the
largest independent distributors in the Northeast by providing a complete line
of competitively priced products, timely delivery and attractive pricing and
financing terms to its customers. Much of Five Star’s success can be attributed
to a continued commitment to provide customers with the highest quality service
at reasonable prices.
2
As one of
the largest distributors of paint sundry items in the Northeast, Five Star
believes it enjoys cost advantages and favorable supply arrangements over the
smaller distributors in the industry. This enables Five Star to compete as a
“low cost” provider. Five Star uses a fully computerized warehouse system to
track all facets of its distribution operations. Nearly all phases of the
selling process from inventory management to receivable collection are automated
and tracked; all operations are overseen by senior management at the New Jersey
facility. Five Star is able to capitalize on manufacturer discounts by
strategically timing purchases involving large quantities.
Management
Information System
All of
Five Star’s inventory control, purchasing, accounts payable and accounts
receivable are fully automated on an IBM iSeries computer system. In addition,
its software alerts buyers to purchasing needs, and monitors payables and
receivables. This system allows senior management to control closely all phases
of our operations. Five Star also maintain a salesperson-order-entry system,
which allows the salesperson to scan product information and then download the
information to a hand held device. The hand held device contains all product and
customer information and interacts with the iSeries.
Competition
Competition
within Five Star’s industry is intense. There are large national distributors
commonly associated with national franchises such as Ace and TruServ as well as
smaller regional distributors, all of whom offer similar products and services.
Five Star’s customers face stiff competition from Home Depot and Lowe’s, which
purchase directly from manufacturers and dealer-owned distributors such as Ace
and TruServ. Moreover, in some instances manufacturers bypass the distributor
and choose to sell and ship their products directly to the retail outlet. Five
Star competes through its strategically placed distribution centers and its
extensive inventory of quality, name-brand products. Five Star intends to
continue to focus its efforts on supplying its products to its customers at a
competitive price and on a timely, consistent basis.
Management
believes that hardware stores that are affiliated with the large, dealer-owned
distributors, such as Ace, also utilize Five Star’s services because they are
uncomfortable with relying solely on their dealer network. Most cooperative-type
distributors lack the level of service and favorable credit terms that
independent hardware stores enjoy with Five Star. Five Star effectively competes
with the dealer-owned distributors because it believes that it provides more
frequent sales calls, faster deliveries, better financing terms and a full line
of vendors and products from which to choose.
Strategy
Five Star
carries an extensive inventory of the products it distributes and provides
delivery, generally within 24 to 72 hours. Five Star believes that it will
continue to grow its business by providing a complete line of competitively
priced products, timely delivery and attractive pricing and financing terms to
its customers. In the future, Five Star expects that it may attempt to acquire
complementary distributors and to expand the distribution of its use of
private-label products sold under the “Five Star” name.
3
Markets,
Products and Sales
The
do-it-yourself industry relies on distributors to link manufacturer’s products
to the various retail networks. The do-it-yourself market operates on this
two-step distribution process, i.e., manufacturers deal
through distributors, who in turn service retailers. This occurs principally
because most retailers are not equipped to carry sufficient inventory to be cost
effective in their purchases from manufacturers. Thus, distributors add
significant value by effectively coordinating and transporting products to
retail outlets on a timely basis. Five Star distributes and markets products
from hundreds of manufacturers to all of the various types of retailers from
regional paint stores, to lumber yards, to independent paint and hardware
stores.
The
marketing efforts are directed by regional sales managers. These individuals are
responsible for designing, implementing and coordinating marketing policies.
They work closely with senior management to coordinate company-wide marketing
plans as well as to service Five Star’s major multi-state customers. In
addition, each regional sales manager is responsible for overseeing the efforts
of his sales representatives.
The sales
representatives, by virtue of daily contact with Five Star’s customers, are the
most integral part of Five Star’s marketing strategy. It is their responsibility
to generate revenue, ensure customer satisfaction and expand the customer
base. Each representative covers an assigned geographic area. The
representatives are compensated based solely on commission. Five Star has
experienced low turnover in its sales force; most representatives have a minimum
of five years’ experience with Five Star. Many sales representatives had retail
experience in the paint or hardware industry when they were hired by Five
Star.
Five
Star’s size, solid reputation for service, large inventory and attractive
financing terms provide sales representatives with tremendous advantages
relative to competing sales representatives from other distributors. In
addition, the representatives’ efforts are supported by company-sponsored
marketing events. For example, in the first quarter of each year, Five Star
invites all of its customers to special trade shows for Five Star’s major
suppliers, so that suppliers may display their products and innovations. Five
Star also participates in advertising circular programs in the spring and the
fall which contain discount specials and information concerning new product
innovations.
Purchasing
Five Star
relies heavily upon its purchasing capabilities to gain a competitive advantage
relative to its competitors. Five Star’s capacity to stock the necessary
products in sufficient volume and its ability to deliver them promptly upon
demand is an essential component of their service and a major factor in Five
Star’s success.
Since
retail outlets depend upon their distributor’s ability to supply products
quickly upon demand, inventory is the primary working capital investment for
most distribution companies, including Five Star. Through its strategic
purchasing decisions, Five Star carries large quantities of inventory that
support fill ratios of approximately 96%.
All
purchasing decisions are made by the merchandising group, located in New Jersey,
in order to coordinate Five Star’s activities effectively. In addition to
senior management’s active involvement, regional sales managers play an
extremely critical role in this day-to-day process.
Five Star
has developed strong, long-term relationships with the leading suppliers since
its predecessor company, J. Leven, was founded in 1912. As a major distributor
of paint sundry items, suppliers rely on Five Star to introduce new products to
market. Furthermore, suppliers have grown to trust Five Star’s ability to
penetrate the market.
4
Customers
Five
Star’s largest customer accounted for approximately 5.4% of its sales in 2008
and its 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 19% of such sales.
All customers are unaffiliated and do not have a long-term contractual
relationship with Five Star.
Patents,
Trademarks, and other Intellectual Property
Except
for its line of private-label products, Five Star does not have any other
patents, trademarks or other intellectual property. Five Star intends to expand
the distribution of its line of private-label products sold under the “Five
Star” name.
Environmental Matters and
Governmental Regulations
Five
Star’s activities may subject it to federal, state and local environmental laws
and regulations and OSHA regulations. Five Star believes that it is in
compliance in all material respects with such environmental and federal laws and
regulations.
Employees
Five Star
employed 222 people as of December 31, 2008. Management-employee relations are
considered good at both of Five Star’s warehouse facilities. The International
Brotherhood of Teamsters union represents 75 union employees at the New Jersey
warehouse facility. The Connecticut warehouse facility is non-unionized. Five
Star has never experienced a labor strike at its facilities. Five Star’s
contract with Local No. 11, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of
Teamsters, expires on December 19, 2011.
Other
Non-Core Assets
Indevus
Pharmaceuticals
Indevus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Indevus”) is a biopharmaceutical company that
engages in the acquisition, development, and commercialization of products to
treat urological, gynecological, and men’s health conditions.
Effective
April 18, 2007 (the “Indevus Effective Time”), Indevus acquired all of the
outstanding common stock of Valera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Valera”), a Delaware
corporation in which the Company had owned 2,070,670 shares of common stock at
such time, in a merger (the “Valera Merger”) effected pursuant to the terms and
conditions of an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 11, 2006
(the “Valera Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the Valera Merger
Agreement, the Company received 1.1337 shares of Indevus common stock for each
share of Valera common stock held by the Company immediately prior to the
Indevus Effective Time. As a result, the 2,070,670 shares of Valera common stock
held by the Company were converted into an aggregate of 2,347,518 shares of
Indevus common stock. In April 2007, the Company recognized a pre-tax
gain of $14,961,000 in relation to the exchange of shares.
The
Indevus Merger was treated as a tax free merger under Internal Revenue Code
Section 368. In addition, for each share of Valera common stock held
by the Company immediately prior to the Indevus Effective Time, the Company
received one contingent stock right for each of three Valera product candidates
in development - Supprelin-LA, a ureteral stent and VP003 (Octreotide implant) –
convertible into $1.00, $1.00 and $1.50, respectively, worth of Indevus common
stock to the extent of the achievement of specific milestones with respect to
each product candidate are achieved. Thus, if all contingent milestones are
achieved, the Company would receive $2,070,670, $2,070,670 and $3,106,005,
respectively, worth of Indevus common stock on the date each milestone is met,
at which date additional gains will be recognized. On May 3, 2007, Indevus
announced that it had received FDA approval for
Supprelin-LA. Therefore, in May 2007, the Company received the first
$2,070,670 worth of Indevus common stock, consisting of 291,964 shares, and
recognized an additional pre-tax gain of $2,070,670. In the
year ended December 31, 2007, the Company sold 2,639,482 shares of Indevus
stock, which represents all of the shares of Indevus common stock held by the
Company.
5
On March
23, 2009, Indevus filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC announcing the
completion of an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Endo Merger Agreement”) with
Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Endo”) and BTB
Purchaser Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Endo,
pursuant to which Endo acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of the
common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Indevus. As a part of
the merger transaction, certain contingent rights to receive shares of Indevus
common stock upon FDA approval of two drug applications, acquired by the Company
in April 2007, were converted into the right to receive a cash
payment. This cash payment is also contingent upon FDA approval of
said drug applications. As a result of the consummation of the Endo
Merger Agreement, the Company has a contingent right to receive from Endo the
following cash payments; (i) upon FDA approval of the uteral stent drug
application on or before specified dates in 2012, of between $2,685,000 and
$2,327,000 depending on the terms contained in the FDA approval and (ii) upon
FDA approval of VP003(Octreotide implant) drug application on or before
specified dates in 2012, of between $4,028,000 and $3,491,000 depending on the
terms contained in the FDA approval.
Two
related parties, Bedford Oak Partners and Mr. Jerome I. Feldman received 50% of
the profit received from the sale on a pro-rata basis, of 458,019 shares of
Indevus common stock in excess of $3.47 per share, and in the future to
participate in 50% of the profits earned on 19.51% of shares of Indevus common
stock received by the Company upon conversion of the contingent stock rights,
described above, if any, at such time as such shares are sold by the Company. As
a result of the consummation of the Endo Merger Agreement and the conversion of
the contingent stock rights, described above, the two related parties would
receive the following portions of the Company’s cash payments set forth above;
(i) upon FDA approval of the uteral stent between $262,000 and $227,000, and
(ii) upon FDA approval of VP003 (Octreotide implant), between $393,000 and
$341,000.
MXL
Operations
The
Company operated a molder and precision coater of optical plastics business
through its wholly-owned subsidiary MXL until June 19, 2008, when MXL disposed
of substantially all of its assets and transferred certain liabilities (see Note
4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and on the same date the Company
purchased an interest of 19.9% in the sold business. The disposed
operations specialize in manufacturing polycarbonate parts requiring adherence
to strict optical quality specifications, and in the application of abrasion and
fog resistant coatings to those parts. Polycarbonate is the most impact
resistant plastic utilized in optical quality molded parts. Products include
shields, face masks, security domes, and non-optical plastic products, produced
for over 50 clients in the safety, recreation, security, and military
industries.
Millennium
Cell
Millennium
Cell is a publicly traded emerging technology company engaged in the business of
developing innovative fuel systems for the safe storage, transportation and
generation of hydrogen for use as an energy source. At December 31, 2008, the
Company owned 364,771 shares of common stock of Millennium with a market value
of $7,000, representing approximately a 1% ownership interest.
6
Pawling Property
We own an
approximately 950 acre parcel of undeveloped land in Pawling, New York, with a
carrying amount of approximately $2,500,000. The site is currently
unoccupied.
Connecticut
Property
We own
property in East Killingly, Connecticut with a carrying amount of approximately
$400,000.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
Risks
Related to our Business
If
Five Star is unable to compete successfully, our revenues may be adversely
affected.
Competition
within the do-it-yourself industry is intense. There are large national
distributors commonly associated with national franchises such as Ace and
TruServ as well as smaller regional distributors, all of whom offer products and
services similar to those offered by Five Star. Moreover, in some instances,
manufacturers will bypass distributors and choose to sell and ship their
products directly to retail outlets. In addition, Five Star’s customers face
stiff competition from Home Depot, Lowe’s and other large direct distributors,
which purchase directly from manufacturers, and national franchises such as Ace
and TruServ. Five Star competes principally through its strategically placed
distribution centers and its extensive inventory of quality, name-brand
products. Five Star will continue to focus its efforts on supplying its products
to its customers at a competitive price and on a timely, consistent
basis.
Adverse
changes in general business conditions in the United States and worldwide may
reduce the demand for some of Five Star’s products and adversely affect its
results of operations and financial condition. Higher inflation rates, interest
rates, tax rates and unemployment rates, higher labor and healthcare costs,
recessions, changing governmental policies, laws and regulations, and other
economic factors that adversely affect the demand for its home decorating,
hardware and finishing and related products could adversely affect their results
of operations and financial condition.
Five
Star’s business involves the sale of home decorating, hardware and finishing and
related products to segments of the economy that are cyclical in nature,
particularly segments relating to construction, housing and manufacturing. Their
sales to these segments are affected by the levels of discretionary consumer and
business spending in these segments. During economic downturns in these
segments, the levels of consumer and business discretionary spending may
decrease. This decrease in spending will likely reduce the demand for some of
Five Star’s products and adversely affect their sales and earnings.
Five
Star’s inability to compete successfully would materially affect our results of
operations and working capital.
The
loss of our key personnel, including our executive management team, could harm
our business.
The
Company’s success is largely dependent upon the experience and continued
services of its executive management team and their other key personnel. The
loss of one or more of the Company’s key personnel and a failure to attract or
promote suitable replacements for them may adversely affect their
business.
7
Expiration
or Cancellation of Leases for Warehouse Facilities
The
Company’s leases for its Connecticut and New Jersey facilities expire in the
first quarter of 2010. The landlord at our Connecticut facility has the option,
upon six months written notice, to cancel the lease if there is a signed
contract to sell the building. Exercise by the landlord of such option and our
inability to enter into a new lease under favorable terms could have an adverse
impact on our business.
The
current volatility in global economic conditions and the financial markets may
adversely affect our industry, business and results of operations.
The
current volatility and disruption to the capital and credit markets has reached
unprecedented levels and has significantly adversely impacted global economic
conditions, resulting in additional significant recessionary pressures and
further declines in consumer confidence and economic growth. These conditions,
which have already impacted the Company, could lead to further reduced consumer
spending in the foreseeable future. Reduced consumer spending may cause changes
in customer order patterns including changes in the level of inventory at our
customers, which may adversely affect our industry, business and results of
operations.
These
conditions have also resulted in a substantial tightening of the credit markets,
including lending by financial institutions, which is a source of credit for our
borrowing and liquidity. This tightening of the credit markets has
increased the cost of capital and reduced the availability of
credit. It is difficult to predict how long the current economic and
capital and credit market conditions will continue, whether they will continue
to deteriorate and which aspects of our products or business may be adversely
affected. However, if current levels of economic and capital and
credit market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no
assurance that we will not continue to experience an adverse impact, which may
be material, on our business, the cost of and access to capital and credit
markets, and our results of operations.
The
global economic conditions may negatively impact our ability to implement our
business strategy, including the achievement of anticipated cost savings,
profitability or growth targets.
We are
committed to those particular business strategies and initiatives which we have
previously announced and which are generally described in this
report. We believe these are likely to drive future growth. The
global economic conditions may impact our ability to fully implement one or more
of these business strategies and initiatives or our ability to achieve some or
all of the benefits we expect from these strategies and
initiatives. If we are unable to successfully and timely implement
these strategies and initiatives, it would adversely impact our financial
condition and results of operations.
If
our intangible assets become impaired, we may need to record non-cash impairment
charges.
We review
our intangible assets for impairment annually, or when events indicate that the
carrying value of such assets may be impaired. If an impairment is
identified, the carrying value is compared to its estimated fair value and
provisions for impairment are recorded as appropriate. Impairment losses are
significantly impacted by estimates of future operating cash flows and estimates
of fair value. Our estimates of future operating cash flows are based upon our
experience, knowledge and expectations; however, these estimates can be affected
by such factors as our future operating results and future economic conditions,
all of which can be difficult to predict. It is difficult to predict
how long these economic conditions will continue, whether they will continue to
deteriorate, and which aspects of our business may be adversely affected. These
conditions and the continuation of these conditions could impact the fair value
of our intangible assets and could result in future impairment charges, which
would adversely impact our results of operations.
8
Future
results and events beyond our control may impact our ability to satisfy existing
or future financial covenants
Our
ability to satisfy existing or future financial covenants under credit
facilities would be impacted by our future results and by causes and events
beyond our control and there can be no assurance that we will at all times
achieve operating results which will comply with all such covenants, a breach of
which could result in a default under any such credit facility. In
the event of a default the lender could elect to declare the outstanding debt
and interest in other amounts payable under such credit facility to be
immediately due and payable.
Risks
Related to Our Stock
We
have agreed to restrictions and adopted policies that could have possible
anti-takeover effects and reduce the value of our stock.
Several
provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws could deter or delay
unsolicited changes in control of the Company. These include limiting the
stockholders’ powers to amend the Bylaws or remove directors, and prohibiting
the stockholders from increasing the size of the Board of Directors or acting by
written consent instead of at a stockholders’ meeting. Our Board of Directors
has the authority, without further action by the stockholders to fix the rights
and preferences of and issue preferred stock. These provisions and others that
could be adopted in the future could deter unsolicited takeovers or delay or
prevent changes in control or management of the Company including transactions
in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over
then current market prices. These provisions may limit the ability of
stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best
interests.
Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not
applicable.
Item
2. Properties
The
following information describes the material physical properties owned or leased
by the Company and its subsidiaries.
Five Star
leases a warehouse facility in New Jersey totaling 236,000 square feet, a
warehouse facility in Connecticut totaling 98,000 square feet, and a 300 square
foot sales office in New York. GP Strategies and the Company have guaranteed the
leases for our New Jersey and Connecticut warehouses, having annual rentals of
approximately $2,150,000 and expiring in the first quarter of 2010. In February
2008, Five Star extended the lease for the New Jersey warehouse for 12 months to
March 31, 2010. In March 2009, the landlord of the Connecticut
facility released GP Strategies from its guarantee, and accepted the guarantee
from the Company. The landlord at the Connecticut facility has the option, upon
six months prior written notice, to cancel the lease if there is a signed
contract to sell the building. In November 2008, Five Star entered into a two
year lease for a new New York sales office, at an annual rental rate of $11,000
for the first year and $11,544 for the second year. In January 2009, the Company
moved its corporate office from 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY to Five Star’s
headquarters in East Hanover, New Jersey.
9
On April
5, 2007, Five Star, as Tenant, entered into the Agreement of Lease with Kampner
Realty, LLC (“Kampner Realty”), as Landlord (the “Lease”), to lease a 40,000
square foot warehouse located at 1202 Metropolitan Avenue, Brooklyn, New York,
as part of Five Star’s acquisition of substantially all the assets of Right-Way
Dealer Warehouse, Inc. (“Right Way”). The Lease has an initial term
of five years with two successive five-year renewal options and with an annual
lease rent of $325,000 subject to adjustment as provided in the
Lease. Based upon the formula in the lease, the annual payment will
be reduced to $280,000 for the 12 month period commencing January 1,
2009. Five Star also has an option to purchase the premises at any
time during the initial term of the Lease for a purchase price of $7,750,000,
subject to an annual 3% adjustment as provided in the Lease, which represents
the average of the appraisals of the premises undertaken by appraisers retained
by Five Star and the landlord, Kampner Realty, respectively, after the closing
of the transaction. The purchase price was memorialized in an
amendment to the Lease entered into by the parties on June 11,
2007. Kampner Realty is owned by Ronald Kampner, who was hired and
employed by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Five Star as part of Five Star’s
acquisition of the assets from Right-Way. Ronald Kampner is the
principal owner and operator of Right-Way.
The
facilities owned or leased by us are considered to be suitable and adequate for
their intended uses and are considered to be well maintained and in good
condition.
Item 3. Legal
Claims
Relating to Learning Technologies Acquisition
In 2001,
GP Strategies initiated legal proceedings in connection with its 1998
acquisition of Learning Technologies from various subsidiaries (“Systemhouse”)
of MCI Communications Corporation (“MCI”), which were subsequently acquired by
Electronic Data Systems Corporation (“EDS”). The action against MCI was stayed
as a result of MCI’s bankruptcy filing in 2002. GP Strategies settled its claims
against EDS and Systemhouse in 2005, but continued to have a claim in bankruptcy
against MCI as an unsecured creditor. In September 2008, the Bankruptcy Court
approved a settlement between GP Strategies and MCI, which allowed GP Strategies
a Class 6 General Unsecured Claim (as defined in MCI’s Modified Second Amended
Joint Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code) in the
amount of $1,700,000 (the “Allowed Claim”). The Allowed Claim
was satisfied in December 2008 through the distribution of $337,000 in cash and
shares of stock of Verizon Communications Inc. valued at $226,000 on the
distribution date. In connection with the spin-off of the Company, GP
Strategies agreed to contribute to the Company 50% of the proceeds received, net
of legal fees and taxes, with respect to the MCI claims, which is estimated to
be $75,000. See Note 16(c) to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The
Company is not a party to any legal proceeding, the outcome of which is believed
by management to have a reasonable likelihood of having a material adverse
effect upon the financial condition of the Company.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
Not
applicable.
10
PART
II
Item
5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity and
Related Stockholder Matters
The
following table presents the high and low bid and asked prices for the Company’s
common stock for 2008 and 2007. The Company’s common stock, $0.01 par
value, is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. Such quotations reflect
inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not
necessarily represent actual transactions.
Quarter
|
High
|
Low
|
||
2008
|
First
|
$2.38
|
$2.33
|
|
Second
|
$2.28
|
$2.25
|
||
Third
|
$2.12
|
$2.05
|
||
Fourth
|
$1.44
|
$1.35
|
||
2007
|
First
|
$2.47
|
$2.41
|
|
Second
|
$2.75
|
$2.71
|
||
Third
|
$2.50
|
$2.46
|
||
Fourth
|
$2.37
|
$2.31
|
The
number of stockholders of record of the Company’s common stock as of March 13,
2009 was 1,068 and the closing price on the OTC Bulletin Board of such common
stock on that date was $1.15 per share.
The
Company did not declare or pay any cash dividends on its common stock in 2008 or
2007. The Company currently intends to retain future earnings to finance the
growth and development of its business and does not intend to pay cash dividends
in the foreseeable future.
Issuer
Issuances of Equity Securities
On
October 2, 2007, the Company issued without registration under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), to each of Lawrence G. Schafran
and Talton R. Embry, each of whom is a director of the Company, 526 shares of
Company common stock in payment of their quarterly directors
fees. The aggregate value of the 1,052 shares of common stock issued
to Messrs. Schafran and Embry was approximately $2,500 on the date of
issuance. These shares were issued pursuant to exemptions from
registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D
promulgated thereunder.
This
issuance qualified for exemption from registration under the Securities Act
because (i) each of Messrs. Schafran and Embry is an accredited investor, (ii)
the Company did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising in
connection with the issuance, and (iii) Messrs. Schafran and Embry received
restricted securities.
On
December 15, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to
repurchase up to 2,000,000 shares, or approximately 11%, of its outstanding
shares of common stock on that date, from time to time either in open market or
privately negotiated transactions. The Company undertook this repurchase program
in an effort to increase shareholder value.
On August
13, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase of 2,000,000
shares, or approximately 11% of the Company’s then-outstanding shares of common
stock, to the Company’s stock repurchase program originally adopted in December
2006. Immediately prior to this increase, a total of 255,038 shares
remained available for repurchase under this repurchase program.
11
There
were no common stock repurchases made by or on behalf of the Company during the
fourth quarter ended December 31, 2008.
Item
6. Selected Financial Data.
Not
required.
Item
7.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
General
Overview
Five Star
represents the Company’s only operating segment. The Company also
owns certain other non-core assets, including an investment in MXL Operations
Inc., certain contingent stock rights in Indevus and certain real estate in
Pawling, New York and Killingly, Connecticut. For the year ended December
31, 2007 and through June 2008, MXL Operations operated as a separate operating
segment (see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company
monitors Indevus for progress in achieving the milestones related to contingent
stock rights. In the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company sold
2,639,482 shares of Indevus stock, which represents all of the shares of Indevus
common stock held by the Company in 2007. On March 23,
2009, Indevus filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC announcing the
completion of the Endo Merger Agreement with Endo and BTB Purchaser Inc., a
Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Endo, pursuant to which Endo
acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of the common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, of Indevus. As a part of the merger transaction,
certain contingent rights to receive shares of Indevus common stock upon FDA
approval of two drug applications, acquired by the Company in April 2007, were
converted into the right to receive a cash payment. This cash payment
is also contingent upon FDA approval of said drug applications. As a
result of the consummation of the Endo Merger Agreement, the Company has a
contingent right to receive from Endo the following cash payments; (i) upon FDA
approval of the uteral stent drug application on or before specified dates in
2012, of between $2,685,000 and $2,327,000 depending on the terms contained in
the FDA approval and (ii) upon FDA approval of VP003(Octreotide implant) drug
application on or before specified dates in 2012, of between $4,028,000 and
$3,491,000 depending on the terms contained in the FDA approval. See
“Item 1. Business – Other Non-Core Assets” and Note 7 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
On June
19, 2008, pursuant to the terms of the MXL Agreement, by and among the Company,
MXL Industries, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as the Seller, MXL
Operations, MXL Leasing, and MXL Realty, the MXL Buyers (MXL Realty, MXL
Operations and MXL Leasing, collectively) purchased substantially all the assets
and assumed certain liabilities (except the “Excluded Liabilities,” as defined
in the MXL Agreement) of the MXL Business (the Seller’s optical plastics molding
and precision coating business). As consideration, the Seller
received approximately $5,200,000 in cash, of which approximately $2,200,000 was
utilized to fully pay the bank debt relating to the MXL Business. See “Item 1.
Business – General Development of the Business” and Note 4 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
MXL
Industries also made an aggregate capital contribution to the MXL Buyers of
$275,000, allocated to each of MXL Operations, MXL Leasing and MXL Realty in a
manner so that, as of the effective time of the transaction, the Seller has a
19.9% interest in the total capital of each of MXL Leasing and MXL Realty and a
40.95% interest in the total capital of MXL Operations. MXL
Operations has the right to issue additional shares which, if issued, would
reduce the Seller’s interest in each of the MXL Buyers on a pro rata basis to a
minimum of 19.9%. Those shares have been issued and the Company currently owns
19.9% of MXL Operations.
12
On June
26, 2008, pursuant to the terms of the Tender Offer Agreement among the Company,
Five Star and NPDV, a newly-formed wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, NPDV
commenced a tender offer to acquire all the outstanding shares of Five Star
common stock not held by the Company or NPDV at a purchase price of $0.40 per
share, net to the seller in cash, without interest thereon and less any required
withholding taxes. The Tender Offer closed on August 26, 2008, and on
August 28, 2008, the NPDV-Five Star Merger, in which NPDV merged with and into
Five Star, with Five Star continuing as the surviving corporation, wholly-owned
by the Company, was effected. The Company paid approximately
$1,028,000 for the tendered shares, $661,000 for the remaining shares to be
tendered and incurred expenses related to the NPDV-Five Star Merger of
approximately $642,000. See “Item 1. Business – General Development
of the Business” and Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Due to
recent market events that have adversely affected all industries and the economy
as a whole, management has placed increased emphasis on monitoring the risks
associated with the current environment, including the collectability of
receivables, the fair value of assets, and the Company’s liquidity. At this
point in time, there has not been a material impact on the Company’s assets and
liquidity. Management will continue to monitor the risks associated with the
current environment and their impact on the Company’s results.
Five
Star Overview
Five
Star, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (see Note 3 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements) is a distributor in the United States of home decorating,
hardware, and finishing products. Five Star offers products from
leading manufacturers in the home improvement industry and distributes those
products to retail dealers, which include lumber yards, “do-it yourself”
centers, hardware stores and paint stores. Five Star has grown to be
one of the largest independent distributors in the Northeast United States by
providing a complete line of competitively priced products, timely delivery and
attractive pricing and financing terms to its customers.
Five Star
operates in the home improvement market. Five Star faces intense
competition from large national distributors, smaller regional distributors, and
manufacturers that bypass the distributor and sell directly to the retail
outlet. The principal means of competition for Five Star are its
strategically placed distribution centers and its extensive inventory of
quality, name-brand products. In addition, Five Star’s customers face
stiff competition from Home Depot and Lowe’s, which purchase directly from
manufacturers and dealer-owned distributors. Management of Five Star believes
that the independent retailers that are Five Star’s customers remain a viable
alternative to Home Depot and Lowe’s, due to the shopping preferences of and the
retailer’s geographic convenience for some consumers.
On April
5, 2007, Five Star acquired substantially all the assets (except “Excluded
Assets”, as defined) and assumed the “Assumed Liabilities” (as defined) of
Right-Way Dealer Warehouse, Inc. (“Right-Way”) for approximately $3,200,000 in
cash and the assumption of liabilities of $50,000 (the “Right-Way Transaction”).
Transaction costs of $200,000 were incurred by Five Star in connection with the
Right-Way Transaction. The assets consisted primarily of $1,186,000
of accounts receivable at fair value and $2,213,000 of inventory at fair value.
The acquisition included all of Right-Way’s Brooklyn Cash & Carry business
and operations which sells paint sundry and hardware supplies to local retail
stores.
13
Upon
closing of the Right-Way Transaction, Five Star leased a warehouse at which the
Right-Way Brooklyn Cash & Carry business is conducted from an affiliate of
the principal of Right-Way, with an option to purchase the
warehouse. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Five Star
acquired the assets of Right-Way in order to increase its presence and market
share in its current geographic area. To further expand, Five Star is
considering strategies intended to grow its revenue base in the Northeast and
Mid-Atlantic States through internal initiatives and to acquire complementary
distributors outside its current geographic area. There is no
assurance that these growth plans can be executed and, if executed, will be
successful from an operational or financial standpoint. These plans
could require capital in excess of the funds presently available to Five
Star.
Management
discussion of critical accounting policies
The
following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of
operations are based on the consolidated financial statements and notes to
consolidated financial statements contained in this report that have been
prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and include all
the disclosures normally required in annual consolidated financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires
us to make estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
sales and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities. We base these estimates on historical results and various other
assumptions believed to be reasonable, all of which form the basis for making
estimates concerning the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily available from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates.
Certain
of our accounting policies require higher degrees of judgment than others in
their application. These include valuation of accounts receivable,
accounting for investments, vendors’ allowance, impairment of long-lived assets
and accounting for income taxes which are summarized below.
Revenue
recognition
Revenue
on product sales is recognized at the point in time when the product has been
shipped, title and risk of loss has been transferred to the customer, and the
following conditions are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the
price is fixed and determinable, and collectability of the resulting receivable
is reasonably assured. Allowances for estimated returns and discounts
are recognized when sales are recorded.
Stock
based compensation
The
Company accounts for stock based compensation pursuant to Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”
(“SFAS 123R”). Under SFAS 123R, compensation cost is recognized over the vesting
period based on the fair value of the award at the grant date.
Valuation
of accounts receivable
Provisions
for allowance for doubtful accounts are made based on historical loss experience
adjusted for specific credit risks. Measurement of such losses
requires consideration of the Company’s historical loss experience, judgments
about customer credit risk, and the need to adjust for current economic
conditions.
14
Impairment
of long-lived tangible assets
Long-lived
tangible assets with finite lives are tested are for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived tangible assets to
be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset
to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the
asset. If costs of such assets are considered not recoverable, the
impairment to be recognized is measured by determining the amount by which the
carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the
asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their
carrying amount or fair value less cost of sale.
The
measurement of the future net cash flows to be generated is subject to
management’s reasonable expectations with respect to the Company’s future
operations and future economic conditions which may affect those cash
flows.
The
Company owns undeveloped land in Pawling, New York with a carrying amount of
approximately $2,500,000, which management believes is less than its fair value,
less cost of sale and property in East Killingly, Connecticut with a carrying
amount of approximately $400,000. See Note 2 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Accounting for
investments
The
Company’s investment in marketable securities are classified as
available-for-sale and recorded at their market value with unrealized gains and
losses recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. A
decline in market value of any available-for-sale security below cost that is
deemed to be other than temporary, results in an impairment loss, which is
charged to earnings.
Determination
of whether an investment is impaired and whether an impairment is other than
temporary requires management to evaluate evidence as to whether an investment’s
carrying amount is recoverable within a reasonable period of time considering
factors which include the length of time that an investment’s market value is
below its carrying amount and the ability of the investee to sustain an earnings
capacity that would justify the carrying amount of the investment.
Vendor
allowances
The
Company accounts for vendor allowances under the guidance provided by
Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer
(Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor,”
and EITF Issue No. 03-10, “Application of EITF Issue No. 02-16 by Resellers to
Sales Incentives Offered to Consumers by Manufacturers.” Vendor allowances
reduce the carrying cost of inventory unless they are specifically
identified as a reimbursement for promotional programs and/or other
services provided. Any such allowances received in excess of the actual
cost incurred also reduce the carrying cost
of inventory.
15
Income
taxes
Income
taxes are provided for based on the asset and liability method of accounting
pursuant to SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”) and
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48 Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”.
Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS No. 109, the
effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date.
Year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31,
2007
For the
year ended December 31, 2008, the Company had a loss from continuing operations
before income tax benefit and minority interest of $4,577,000 compared to income
from continuing operations before income tax expense and minority interest of
$13,235,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in pre-tax
income from continuing operations is primarily the net result of the following
changes: (i) reduced operating income of $3,503,000 for Five Star for
the year ended December 31, 2008; (ii) a net gain of $17,031,000 recognized on
the merger of Valera and Indevus in the year ended December 31, 2007 (see Note 7
to the Consolidated Financial Statements); (iii) a charge of $680,000
representing the profit paid to related parties upon the sale of Indevus (iv) an
impairment charge of $138,000 and $346,000, in 2008 and 2007, respectively,
related to the Company’s investment in Millennium Cell; and (v) a realized loss
of $1,023,000 on the sale of 2,639,482 shares of Indevus common stock in
2007.
Five
Star’s operating income was $220,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
compared to $3,723,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007. The reduced
operating income of $3,503,000 was primarily attributable to: (i) a $1,096,000
non-cash compensation expense related to the termination of the Five
Star’s agreement with Mr. S. Leslie Flegel during 2008 (see Note 18(a) to
the Consolidated Financial Statements); (ii) a non-cash compensation
charge of $489,000 related to the cancellation of certain Five Star equity
awards in 2008 (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements); (iii)
reduced gross margin of $1,139,000 due to reduced sales in 2008 as compared to
2007; (iv) increased general and administrative expenses of $1,268,000,
primarily due to: (a) the acquisition of Right-Way, which was not consummated
until April 2007, (b) approximately $300,000 of expenses related to the Tender
Offer and NPDV-Five Star Merger that were incurred by Five Star in 2008 (see
Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), and (c) reduced vendor
marketing revenue recognized in 2008.
16
Sales
The
Company had sales, which are comprised solely of the sales of Five Star, of
$115,461,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to sales of
$123,713,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in
Five Star sales for the year ended December 31, 2008 of $8,252,000, or 6.7%, as
compared to the prior year period was due to an overall weakness in the economy
and the Company’s marketplace, offset by sales generated by Right-Way Brooklyn,
Five Star’s Cash and Carry facility purchased in April 2007.
Gross margin
Five
Star’s gross margin was $20,328,000, or 17.6% of net sales, for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to $21,467,000, or 17.4% of net sales, for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in gross margin dollars of
$1,139,000, or 5.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the
year ended December 31, 2007 was a direct result of reduced sales, offset by the
increased gross margin percentage. The increase in gross margin percentage
for the year ended December 31, 2008 was attributable principally to improved
product margins, partially offset by increased warehouse costs as a percentage
of sales. The improved gross margin percentage was the result of
increased vendor allowances as a percentage of sales due to achieving certain
growth and threshold rebates during 2008, as well as the positive effect of
certain purchasing opportunities during the year.
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses
For the
year ended December 31, 2008, selling, general and administrative expenses
(“SG&A”) increased by $308,000 from $22,229,000 for the year ended December
31, 2007 to $22,537,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily
attributable to increased SG&A expenses incurred by Five Star for the
period, partially offset by reduced expenses at the corporate
level. Five Star had increased SG&A expenses of $1,268,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2007
due to: (i) approximately $300,000 of costs incurred related to the Tender Offer
and NPDV-Five Star Merger for the 2008 period incurred by Five Star (see Note 3
to the Consolidated Financial Statements); (ii) a non-cash compensation charge
of $489,000 related to the cancellation of certain Five Star equity awards (see
Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and (iii) reduced vendor
marketing revenue of $1,411,000 recognized by Five Star, partially offset by:
(a) reduced equity based compensation expense of $362,000, (b) reduced personnel
related costs of $264,000, and (c) reduced professional fees of approximately
$392,000. In addition, there were reduced expenses at the corporate
level of $918,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily due to reduced
professional fees and personnel costs in 2008.
17
Gain
on exchange of Valera shares for Indevus shares
For the
year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized a gain of $17,031,000 as a
result of the merger of Valera, in which the Company had an approximately 14%
interest, and Indevus, in which the Company obtained an approximate 3% interest
as a result of such merger. The gain includes the receipt of the first of three
contingent tranches of consideration, which was valued at $2,070,000 and was
received in May 2007. The Company continues to hold contingent stock rights for
certain products in development by Indevus that will become convertible into
shares of Indevus common stock to the extent specific milestones with respect to
each product are achieved. On March 23, 2009, Indevus filed a Current
Report on Form 8-K with the SEC announcing the completion of the Endo Merger
Agreement with Endo and BTB Purchaser Inc., a Delaware corporation and
wholly-owned subsidiary of Endo, pursuant to which Endo acquired all of the
issued and outstanding shares of the common stock, par value $0.001 per share,
of Indevus. As a part of the merger transaction, certain contingent
rights to receive shares of Indevus common stock upon FDA approval of two drug
applications, acquired by the Company in April 2007, were converted into the
right to receive a cash payment. This cash payment is also contingent
upon FDA approval of said drug applications. As a result of the
consummation of the Endo Merger Agreement, the Company has a contingent right to
receive from Endo the following cash payments; (i) upon FDA approval of the
uteral stent drug application on or before specified dates in 2012, of between
$2,685,000 and $2,327,000 depending on the terms contained in the FDA approval
and (ii) upon FDA approval of VP003(Octreotide implant) drug application on or
before specified dates in 2012, of between $4,028,000 and $3,491,000 depending
on the terms contained in the FDA approval. See Note 17(a) to the Consolidated
Financial Statements. The merger between Valera and Indevus was
treated as a tax free merger under Internal Revenue Code Section
368.
Investment
and other income (loss), net
The
Company recognized Investment and other income (loss), net of $94,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to a loss of ($1,605,000) for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The change in Investment and other
income (loss), net is mainly due to the following: (i) the profit sharing
of $680,000, which was paid upon sale of all the Company’s Indevus shares in
2007 (see Note 17(a) to the Consolidated Financial Statements); (ii) a loss of
$1,023,000 on the sale of the Indevus shares in 2007 (See Note 7 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements); and (iii) an impairment charge
of $138,000 and $346,000 related to the Company’s investment in
Millenium Cell in 2008 and 2007, respectively. At December 31, 2007, the Company
had sold all its shares of Indevus. As discussed above, the Company has two
additional contingent tranches of consideration remaining upon the achievement
of certain milestones relating to particular products in development (see Note 7
to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Income
taxes
For the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded an income tax
(benefit) expense of $(940,000), and $1,269,000, respectively, which represents
the Company’s applicable federal, state and local tax (benefit) expense for the
periods. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the provision for
income taxes differed from the tax computed at the federal statutory income tax
rate primarily due to state and local income taxes, non-deductible expenses, and
an increase in the valuation allowance with respect to losses incurred by the
Company. In connection with the increase in ownership of Five Star
from less than 80% to 100% during 2008, the excess of the financial reporting
basis over tax basis in Five Star was no longer considered to be a taxable
temporary difference and accordingly, a related $279,000 deferred income tax
liability was reflected as an income tax benefit in 2008. For the
year ended December 31, 2007, the provision for income taxes differed from the
tax computed at the federal statutory income tax rate primarily due to recording
income tax expense on the income of Five Star, which was a 57% owned subsidiary,
and was not included in the Company’s consolidated return, and state income
taxes recorded on the sale of Indevus stock. A federal tax provision
was not recorded for the year ended December 31, 2007 with respect to the gain
recognized on the exchange of Valera for Indevus shares or the subsequent gain
recognized for tax purposes on the sale of Indevus shares, since it was offset
by the Company’s net operating and capital loss
carryforwards. The Company recorded a state income tax expense
of $345,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007 related to the Indevus
transaction. Income tax expense of $185,000 was recorded as part of discontinued
operations for the year ended December 31, 2008, as it relates to tax on the
operations of MXL Industries and the gain related to its sale.
18
Financial
condition
The
decrease in inventory, accounts receivables and accounts payable is due to
reduced sales volumes at Five Star, as well as a concerted effort to reduce
inventory levels to better manage working capital. At December 31,
2008, the Company had $13,021,000 of cash at the corporate level.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At
December 31, 2008, the Company had cash and cash equivalents totaling
$13,089,000. The Company believes that cash and borrowing availability
under existing credit agreement will be sufficient to fund the Company’s working
capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. On August 13, 2008, the
holders of certain warrants to acquire shares of Company common stock exercised
their warrants and the Company issued and sold 1,423,886 shares of its common
stock to such warrant holders for cash consideration of $2.50 per share, or an
aggregate of $3,560,000 (see Note 18(b) to the Consolidated Financial
Statements).
For the
year ended December 31, 2008, the Company’s working capital decreased by
$3,451,000 to $20,803,000 from $24,254,000 as of December 31, 2007.
The
decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $2,609,000 for the year ended December
31, 2008 as compared to December 31, 2007 resulted from:
·
|
net
cash used in operations of $1,241,000, due primarily to a net loss of
$3,394,000;
|
·
|
an
decrease in accounts receivable of $1,530,000, and a decrease in inventory
of $3,667,000, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable and
accrued expenses of $4,940,000;
|
·
|
net
cash used in investing activities of $140,000, primarily due to net cash
proceeds of $4,661,000 from the sales of certain assets of MXL Industries
(see Note 4 to the Financial Statements), offset by
additions to property, plant and equipment of $672,000 and the acquisition
of additional interest in Five Star of $3,854,000, which is comprised
of:
|
§
|
$2,331,000
related to the Tender Offer and the NPDV-Five Star Merger (see Note 3 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements);
and
|
§
|
purchases
of Five Star common stock for $1,523,000, which was comprised of $763,000
in open market purchases and $1,200,000 from S. Leslie Flegel, the former
Chairman of Five Star, and his family, of which $440,000 was charged to
operations (see Note 18(a) to the Consolidated Financial
Statements);
|
·
|
net
cash used in financing activities of $1,228,000, consisting of repayments
of short term borrowings of $1,553,000, purchases of treasury stock of
$1,115,000 and repayments of long-term debt of $1,698,000, partially
offset by proceeds from the exercise of common stock warrants of
$3,560,000 (see Note 18(b) to the Consolidated Financial
Statements).
|
19
On June
27, 2008, Five Star entered into a Restated and Amended Loan and Security
Agreement (the “Amended Loan Agreement”), with Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of
America”). The Amended Loan Agreement extends the maturity date of that
certain Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2003, entered into by
Five Star and Bank of America (through its predecessor Fleet Capital
Corporation), as amended (the “2003 Loan Agreement”), until June 30,
2011. The 2003 Loan Agreement, as amended by the Amended Loan
Agreement, is referred to herein as the “Loan Agreement”.
The Loan
Agreement provides Five Star with a $35,000,000 revolving credit facility
(“Revolving Credit Facility”), subject to a $3,500,000 sub-limit for letters of
credit. The Revolving Credit Facility allows Five Star to borrow up
to (a) 85% of eligible receivables plus (b) the greater of (i) the lesser of
$20,000,000 or 65% (to be reduced by 1% per quarter commencing July 1, 2008) of
eligible inventory, or (ii) the lesser of $20,000,000 or 85% of the appraised
net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory minus (c) the amount of
outstanding letter of credit obligations, as those terms are defined
therein. All obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility are
secured by first priority liens on all of Five Star’s existing and future
assets. In connection with the Amended Loan Agreement, on June 27,
2008, Five Star executed the Restated and Amended Promissory Note, dated as of
June 26, 2008, payable to Bank of America in the principal amount of $35,000,000
(the “Promissory Note”). The Promissory Note restates and replaces a
certain $35,000,000 Revolving Note, dated as of June 1, 2005, made by Five Star
in favor of Bank of America. The principal amount under the
Promissory Note is due and payable on June 30, 2011.
Loans
made to Five Star under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a per
annum rate based on the Base Rate of Bank of America, as defined, plus 2.25%, as
modified, or at a per annum rate based on LIBOR plus 325 basis points, as
modified, at Five Star’s election. The LIBOR and Base Rate
margins are subject to adjustment based on certain performance benchmarks. At
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $18,375,000 and $19,303,000 was
outstanding under the Loan Agreement and $3,677,000 and $5,579,000 was available
to be borrowed, respectively. Substantially all of Five Star’s assets
are pledged as collateral for these borrowings.
In
connection with the 2003 Loan Agreement, Five Star also entered into a
derivative transaction with Bank of America. The derivative
transaction is an interest rate swap and has been designated as a cash flow
hedge. Effective June 30, 2008 through June 30, 2011, Five Star is to
pay a fixed interest rate of 3.62% to Bank of America on notional principal of
$20,000,000. In return, Bank of America is to pay to Five Star a
floating rate, namely, LIBOR, on the same notional principal
amount. The credit spread under the Amended Loan Agreement is not
included in, and will be paid in addition to, this fixed interest rate of
3.62%. The fair value of the interest rate swap amounted to
$(1,111,000) at December 31, 2008 and is included in Liability
related to interest rate swap in the accompanying balance sheets.
Under the
Loan Agreement, Five Star is subject to covenants requiring minimum net worth,
limitations on losses, if any, and minimum or maximum values for certain
financial ratios. As of December 31, 2008, Five Star was in compliance with
these covenants. The Company anticipates being in violation of its
original fixed charge coverage ratio during 2009, and, therefore, Bank of
America has amended the quarterly ratios through the quarter ended March 31,
2010. There is no assurance that Five Star can comply with these covenants in
future quarters.
20
The
following table sets forth the significant debt covenants at December 31,
2008:
Covenant
|
Required
|
Calculated
|
||
Minimum
tangible net worth
|
$7,000,000
|
$9,347,000
|
||
Debt
to tangible net worth
|
<
6
|
1.97
|
||
Fixed
charge coverage (*)
|
>1.0
|
1.03
|
||
Quarterly
income (loss)
|
No
loss in consecutive quarters
|
$115,000 – third
quarter profit (**)
$125,000
– fourth quarter loss
|
||
|
*
|
Amended
by Bank of America through the quarter ended March 31,
2010.
|
**
|
The
Loan Agreement excludes non-cash charges related to any equity instruments
(common stock, options and warrants) issued to any employee, director, or
consultant from the covenant
calculations.
|
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS
No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measurement of
fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
clarifies that fair value should be based on assumptions that market
participants will use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair
value hierarchy of three levels that prioritize the information used
to develop those assumptions. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January
1, 2008 with respect of financial statements and liabilities. The adoption of
SFAS No. 157 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-2 “Partial Deferral of
the Effective Date of Statement 157” (“FSP 157-2”). FSP 157-2 delays the
effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2008. The Company does not expect adoption of SFAS 157-2 for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009 to have a material effect
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
February, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. This statement provides
companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at
fair value. Although, this statement became effective for the Company beginning
January 1, 2008, the Company did not elect to value any financial assets and
liabilities at fair value.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations”
(“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R), replaces
SFAS No. 141,
“Business Combinations”, and establishes principles and requirements for
how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree, and any goodwill acquired in a business combination.
SFAS No. 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the
evaluation of the nature and financial effects of a business combination.
SFAS No. 141(R) is to be applied prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The
impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will have on the Company’s financial
statements is not presently determinable, since it is dependant on future
acquisitions, if any.
21
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 requires that
ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, be
clearly identified, labeled, and presented in the consolidated financial
statements within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. It also
requires once a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity
investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value.
Sufficient disclosures are required to clearly identify and distinguish between
the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling
owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and is to be applied retrospectively for all periods
presented.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (“SFAS No. 161”), “Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133”. SFAS No. 161 gives financial statement users better information about
the reporting entity's hedges by providing for qualitative disclosures about the
objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative data about the
fair value of and gains and losses on derivative contracts, and details of
credit-risk-related contingent features in their hedged positions. The standard
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged,
but not required. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No.
161 will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
GP
Strategies and the Company have guaranteed the leases for Five Star’s New Jersey
and Connecticut warehouses, totaling approximately $2,150,000 per year through
the first quarter of 2010. GP Strategies’ guarantee of such leases was in effect
when Five Star was a wholly-owned subsidiary of GP Strategies. As part of the
spin-off, the landlord of the New Jersey and Connecticut did not consent to the
release of GP Strategies’ guarantee. In March 2009, the landlord of the
Connecticut facility released GP Strategies from its guarantee, and accepted the
guarantee from the Company.
Item
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Not
required
22
Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data
INDEX
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial
Statements of National Patent Development Corporation and
Subsidiaries
23
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board
of Directors and Stockholders of
National
Patent Development Corporation:
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National
Patent Development Corporation (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and
2007 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
(loss) income, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for the years
then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were
not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits include consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of National
Patent Development Corporation as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years
then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
EISNER
LLP
New York,
New York
March 26,
2009
24
NATIONAL
PATENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in
thousands, except per share data)
Year
Ended
|
||||||||
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Sales
|
$ | 115,461 | $ | 123,713 | ||||
Cost
of sales
|
95,133 | 102,246 | ||||||
Gross
margin
|
20,328 | 21,467 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
expenses
|
(22,537 | ) | (22,229 | ) | ||||
Charge
related to resignation of Chairman of Five Star
|
(1,096 | ) | ||||||
Operating loss
|
(3,305 | ) | (762 | ) | ||||
Interest
expense
|
(1,366 | ) | (1,429 | ) | ||||
Gain
on exchange of Valera for Indevus shares
|
- | 17,031 | ||||||
Investment
and other income (loss), net
|
94 | (1,605 | ) | |||||
(Loss)
income from continuing operations before income taxes
and minority interest
|
(4,577 | ) | 13,235 | |||||
Income
tax benefit (expense)
|
940 | ( 1,269 | ) | |||||
(Loss)
income from continuing operations before minority interest
|
(3,637 | ) | 11,966 | |||||
Minority
interest
|
(34 | ) | (514 | ) | ||||
(Loss)
income from continuing operations
|
(3,671 | ) | 11,452 | |||||
Income
from discontinued operations, net of taxes, including an $87 gain on sale
of assets in 2008
|
277 | 270 | ||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (3,394 | ) | $ | 11,722 | |||
Basic
and diluted net (loss) income per share:
|
||||||||
Continuing
operations
|
$ | (0.22 | ) | $ | 0.65 | |||
Discontinued
operations
|
0.02 | 0.02 | ||||||
Net
(loss) income per share
|
$ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 0.67 | |||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
25
NATIONAL
PATENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(in
thousands)
Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(3,394
|
) |
$
|
11,722
|
|||
Other
comprehensive income (loss), before tax:
|
||||||||
Net
unrealized loss on available-for-sale-securities
|
(102
|
)
|
(1,036
|
)
|
||||
Reclassification
adjustment principally for gain on exchange of Valera securities
recognized in merger included in net income
|
(4,598
|
)
|
||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for realized losses on sales of Indevus shares
included in net income
|
1,023
|
|||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for loss on impairment of investment in Millenium Cell included
in net income (loss)
|
138
|
346
|
||||||
Net
unrealized loss on interest rate swap, net of minority interest in
2007
|
(1,112
|
)
|
(143
|
)
|
||||
Comprehensive
(loss) income before tax
|
(4,470
|
)
|
7,314
|
|||||
Income
tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive income (loss),
net of minority interest
|
426
|
57
|
||||||
Comprehensive
(loss) income
|
$
|
(4,044
|
)
|
$
|
7,371
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
26
NATIONAL
PATENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
13,089
|
$
|
15,698
|
||||
Accounts
and other receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $420 and
$271
|
9,814
|
12,755
|
||||||
Inventories
|
23,045
|
27,720
|
||||||
Deferred
tax asset
|
132
|
470
|
||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
1,334
|
1,326
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
47,414
|
57,969
|
||||||
Marketable
securities available for sale
|
7
|
109
|
||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
912
|
3,534
|
||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
599
|
|||||||
Deferred
tax asset
|
1,537
|
|||||||
Other
assets
|
3,202
|
3,293
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
53,671
|
$
|
64,905
|
||||
Liabilities
and stockholders’ equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
$
|
$
|
257
|
|||||
Short
term borrowings
|
18,375
|
19,928
|
||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
8,236
|
13,530
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
26,611
|
33,715
|
||||||
Long-term
debt less current maturities
|
1,441
|
|||||||
Deferred
tax liability
|
279
|
|||||||
Liability
related to interest rate swap
|
1,111
|
|||||||
Minority
interest
|
2,902
|
|||||||
Common
stock subject to exchange rights
|
493
|
|||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share authorized 10,000,000
shares;
issued
none
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Common
stock, par value $0.01 per share authorized 30,000,000
shares;
issued
18,105,148 shares in 2008 and 18,086,006 shares in 2007
|
181
|
180
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
28,642
|
26,825
|
||||||
Retained
earnings (deficit)
|
(849
|
)
|
2,545
|
|||||
Treasury
stock, at cost (564,569 shares in 2008 and 1,528,462 shares in
2007)
|
(1,358
|
)
|
(3,458
|
)
|
||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income
|
(667
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
25,949
|
26,075
|
||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
53,671
|
$
|
64,905
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
NATIONAL
PATENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(3,394
|
)
|
$
|
11,722
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
656
|
783
|
||||||
Minority
interest
|
34
|
514
|
||||||
Gain
on sale of MXL assets
|
(87
|
)
|
||||||
Impairment
of investment
|
138
|
346
|
||||||
Gain
on exchange of Valera for Indevus shares
|
(17,031
|
)
|
||||||
Expenses
paid in common stock
|
52
|
60
|
||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
2,160
|
1,253
|
||||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
278
|
123
|
||||||
Loss
on sale of Indevus shares
|
1,023
|
|||||||
Gain
on issuance of stock by subsidiary
|
(1
|
)
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(1,027
|
)
|
426
|
|||||
Changes
in other operating items net of acquisition:
|
||||||||
Accounts
and other receivables
|
1,530
|
247
|
||||||
Inventories
|
3,667
|
(2,972
|
)
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
(308
|
)
|
(476
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(4,940
|
)
|
3,305
|
|||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(1,241
|
)
|
(678
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Additions
to property, plant and equipment
|
(672
|
)
|
(1,392
|
)
|
||||
Acquisition
of minority interest in Five Star
|
(3,854
|
)
|
(106
|
)
|
||||
Acquisition
of Right Way by Five Star
|
(3,399
|
)
|
||||||
Net
proceeds from sales of assets of MXL
|
4,661
|
|||||||
Investment
in MXL
|
(275
|
)
|
||||||
Proceeds
from sale of investment
|
17,598
|
|||||||
Repayment
of receivable from GP Strategies
|
251
|
|||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
$
|
(140
|
)
|
$
|
12,952
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
(Continued)
28
NATIONAL
PATENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of common stock
|
$
|
$
|
480
|
|||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(1,115
|
)
|
(3,270
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from exercise of common stock warrants
|
3,560
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of long-term debt
|
407
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from (repayment of) short-term borrowings
|
(1,553
|
)
|
1,514
|
|||||
Settlement
of option and repurchase of Five Star options
|
(422
|
)
|
||||||
Repayment
of long-term debt
|
(1,698
|
)
|
(192
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(1,228
|
)
|
(1,061
|
)
|
||||
Net (decrease)
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(2,609
|
)
|
11,213
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
15,698
|
4,485
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
13,089
|
$
|
15,698
|
||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$
|
1,543
|
$
|
1,616
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
564
|
651
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
29
NATIONAL
PATENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(in
thousands, except per share data)
Common
Stock
|
Additional
paid-in
|
Retained
|
Treasury
stock,
at
|
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
|
Total
stockholders’
|
||||||||||||||||||||
shares
|
amount
|
capital
|
earnings
|
cost
|
income
(loss)
|
equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
17,861,670
|
$
|
178
|
$
|
25,990
|
$
|
(9,177
|
)
|
$
|
(188
|
)
|
$
|
4,334
|
$
|
21,137
|
||||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of
common
stock
|
200,000
|
2
|
478
|
480
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment,
principally
for gain on exchange of
Valera
securities recognized in
merger
included in net income
|
(4,598
|
)
|
(4,598
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for
realized
losses on sale of Indevus
shares
included in net income
|
1,023
|
1,023
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for
impairment
of investment in
Millenium
Cell measured in net
income
|
346
|
346
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized loss on available for
sale
securities
|
(1,036
|
)
|
(1,036
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized loss on interest rate
swap,
net of tax and minority
interest
|
(86
|
)
|
(86
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
11,722
|
11,722
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock subject to exchange
rights
reclassified to temporary
equity
|
(493
|
)
|
(493
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Equity
based compensation expense
|
790
|
790
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of 1,428,462 shares of
treasury
stock
|
(3,270
|
)
|
(3,270
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock to MXL
Retirement
and Savings Plan
|
19,161
|
47
|
47
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock to
directors
|
5,175
|
13
|
13
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
18,086,006
|
$
|
180
|
$
|
26,825
|
$
|
2,545
|
$
|
(3,458
|
)
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
$
|
26,075
|
30
NATIONAL
PATENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(continued)
(in
thousands, except per share data)
Common
Stock
|
Additional
paid-in
|
Retained
|
Treasury
stock,
at
|
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
|
Total
stockholders’
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
shares
|
amount
|
capital
|
earnings
|
cost
|
income
(loss)
|
equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
18,086,006
|
$
|
180
|
$
|
26,825
|
$
|
2,545
|
$
|
(3,458
|
)
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
$
|
26,075
|
|||||||||||||
Net
unrealized loss on available
for
sale securities
|
(102
|
)
|
(102
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment related to loss on impairment of available for sale securities
included in net loss
|
138
|
138
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized loss on interest rate swap, net of tax of $472 and
minority interest of $14
|
(686
|
)
|
(686
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(3,394
|
)
|
(3,394
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity
based compensation expense
|
1,318
|
1,318
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchased
equity options of Five Star, net of minority interest of
$32
|
(150
|
)
|
(150
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement
of option to acquire shares of Five Star
|
(240
|
)
|
(240
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of 1,423,886 treasury shares upon exercise of warrants
|
351
|
3,209
|
3,560
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of 462,859 shares of
Treasury
Stock
|
(1,115
|
)
|
(1,115
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of 2,866 shares of treasury stock to directors
|
6
|
6
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of common stock subject to exchange rights
|
493
|
493
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock to MXL Retirement and Savings
Plan
|
10,260
|
1
|
24
|
25
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock to directors
|
8,882
|
|
21
|
21
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
|
18,105,148
|
$
|
181
|
$
|
28,642
|
$
|
(849
|
)
|
$
|
(1,358
|
)
|
$
|
(667
|
)
|
$
|
25,949
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
31
NATIONAL
PATENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Description
of business
National
Patent Development Corporation (the “Company”), through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Five Star Products, Inc. (“Five Star”), is engaged in the wholesale
distribution of home decorating, hardware and finishing products, which
represents the only operating segment of the Company as of December 31, 2008.
Five Star serves independent retail dealers in 12 states in the Northeast.
Products distributed include paint sundry items, interior and exterior stains,
brushes, rollers, caulking compounds and hardware products.
On June
19, 2008, the Company sold substantially all the operating assets of its optical
plastics molding and precision coating operating segment, MXL Industries, Inc
(“MXL”) (see Note 4). The results of operations for MXL have been
accounted for as a discontinued operation in 2008 and the 2007 results of
operations have been reclassified to be consistent with the current year
presentation.
On August
28, 2008, Five Star, which was 57% owned at December 31, 2007, became a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Company upon the consummation of a tender offer and a
merger between Five Star and a newly formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, with Five Star continuing as the surviving corporation (see Note
3).
2. Summary
of significant accounting policies
Principles of consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements include the financial
statements of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation.
Cash
equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of money market
funds.
Marketable securities.
Marketable securities consist of U.S. corporate equity securities
classified as available-for-sale investments and recorded at their fair
value. Unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities
are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of
stockholders’ equity in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of the
related tax effect, until realized. A decline in the market value of any
available-for-sale security below cost, that is deemed to be other than
temporary, results in a reduction in carrying amount to fair value. Such other
than temporary decline is charged to earnings, and a new cost basis is
established. Realized gains and losses are derived using the average cost
method for determining the cost of securities sold.
Inventories. Inventories are
valued at the lower of cost, using the first-in, first-out method, or
market.
Revenue recognition.
Revenue on product sales is recognized at the point in time when
the product has been shipped, title and risk of loss has been transferred to the
customer, and the following conditions are met: persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, the price is fixed and determinable, and collectability of
the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Allowances for
estimated returns and discounts are recognized when sales are
recorded.
Stock based compensation. The
Company accounts for stock based compensation pursuant to Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”
(“SFAS 123R”). Under SFAS 123R, compensation cost is recognized over the vesting
period based on the fair value of the award at the grant date.
32
Valuation of accounts receivable.
Provisions for doubtful accounts are made based on historical loss
experience adjusted for specific credit risks. Measurement of such
losses requires consideration of the Company’s historical loss experience,
judgments about customer credit risk, and the need to adjust for current
economic conditions. The allowance for doubtful accounts as a
percentage of total gross trade receivables was 4.1% and 3.1% at December 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Impairment of long-lived tangible
assets. Long-lived tangible assets with finite lives are tested for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of
long-lived tangible assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of
the carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected
to be generated by the asset. If carrying amount is not considered to
be recoverable, the impairment to be recognized is measured by determining the
amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their
carrying amount or fair value less cost of sale.
The
measurement of the future net cash flows to be generated is subject to
management’s reasonable expectations with respect to the Company’s future
operations and future economic conditions which may affect those cash
flows.
The
Company has investments in undeveloped land in Pawling, New York with a carrying
value of approximately $2,500,000, which management believes is less
than fair value and in Killingly, Connecticut with a carrying
value of $400,000, which are included in Other assets in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
Vendor allowances.
Vendor allowances reduce the carrying cost of inventory unless they are
specifically identified as a reimbursement for promotional programs and/or
other services provided. Any such allowances received in excess of the
actual cost incurred also reduce the carrying cost
of inventory.
Income taxes. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the
year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date.
Shipping and handling costs.
Shipping and handling costs, which are included as a part of selling,
general and administrative expense, amounted to $5,403,000 and $5,390,000 for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Property, plant and
equipment. Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost, net of
allowance for depreciation. Major additions and improvements are capitalized
while maintenance and repairs which do not extend the lives of the assets
are expensed as incurred. Gain or loss on the disposition of property,
plant and equipment is recognized in operations when realized. Depreciation
is provided on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of 5 to 40
years for buildings and improvements and 3 to 7 years for
machinery, equipment and furniture and fixtures.
Fair value of financial
instruments. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate estimated fair values
because of short maturities. The carrying value of short term borrowings
approximates estimated fair value because borrowings accrue interest which
fluctuates with changes in LIBOR or prime.
33
Marketable
securities are carried at fair value based upon quoted market prices.
Derivative instruments are carried at fair value representing the
amount the Company would receive or pay to terminate the
derivative.
Derivatives and hedging
activities. In the normal course of business, the Company enters
into derivative financial instruments in order to manage exposures resulting
from fluctuations in interest rates. The interest rate swap entered into by Five
Star in connection with its loan agreement (see Note 11) is being accounted for
under SFAS No. 133, as amended, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 133 requires all derivatives to be recognized
in the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be
adjusted to fair value through earnings. If the derivative is a cash flow
hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recognized in other
comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The
ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value is immediately
recognized in earnings. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate
swap, which has been designated as a cash flow hedge, were recognized
in other comprehensive income.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS
No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measurement of
fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
clarifies that fair value should be based on assumptions that market
participants will use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair
value hierarchy of three levels that prioritize the information used
to develop those assumptions. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January
1, 2008 with respect to financial assets and financial liabilities. The adoption
of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-2 “Partial Deferral of
the Effective Date of Statement 157” (“FSP 157-2”). FSP 157-2 delays the
effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2008. The Company does not expect adoption of SFAS 157-2 for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009 to have a material effect
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
February, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. This statement provides
companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at
fair value. Although, this statement became effective for the Company beginning
January 1, 2008, the Company did not elect to value any financial assets and
liabilities at fair value.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations”
(“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R), replaces
SFAS No. 141,
“Business Combinations”, and establishes principles and requirements for
how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree, and any goodwill acquired in a business combination.
SFAS No. 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the
evaluation of the nature and financial effects of a business combination.
SFAS No. 141(R) is to be applied prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The
impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will have on the Company’s financial
statements is not presently determinable, since it is dependant on future
acquisitions, if any.
34
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 requires that
ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, be
clearly identified, labeled, and presented in the consolidated financial
statements within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. It also
requires once a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity
investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value.
Sufficient disclosures are required to clearly identify and distinguish between
the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling
owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and is to be applied retrospectively for all periods
presented.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (“SFAS No. 161”), “Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133”. SFAS No. 161 gives financial statement users better information about
the reporting entity's hedges by providing for qualitative disclosures about the
objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative data about the
fair value of and gains and losses on derivative contracts, and details of
credit-risk-related contingent features in their hedged positions. The standard
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged,
but not required. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No.
161 will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Use of estimates. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Concentrations of credit
risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash
investments, and accounts receivable from customers. The Company places its cash
investments with high quality financial institutions and limits the amount
of credit exposure to any one institution.
35
Income (loss) per share.
Income (loss) per share for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 is
calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Year
Ended
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Basic
EPS
|
||||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
$
|
(3,671
|
)
|
$
|
11,452
|
|||
Income
from discontinued operation
|
277
|
270
|
||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
(3,394
|
)
|
$
|
11,722
|
|||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
16,784
|
17,450
|
||||||
Continuing
operations
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
$
|
0.65
|
|||
Discontinued
operations
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
||||||
Net
earnings (loss) per share
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
$
|
0.67
|
|||
Diluted
EPS
|
||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
16,784
|
17,450
|
||||||
Dilutive
effect of stock options
|
13
|
|||||||
Diluted
weighted average shares outstanding
|
16,784
|
17,463
|
||||||
Continuing
operations
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
$
|
0.65
|
|||
Discontinued
operations
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
||||||
Net
earnings (loss) per share
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
$
|
0.67
|
The
following were not included in the diluted computation, as their effect would be
anti-dilutive:
December
31, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||
Options
|
3,350,000 | 782,830 | ||||||
Warrants
|
* | 1,423,887 | ||||||
Five
Star’s convertible note
|
** | 2,800,000 | ||||||
Five
Star’s options
|
*** | 975,000 |
* 1,423,887 warrants were exercised in
August 2008 (see Note 19(b))
** $2,800,000 convertible note was
converted in July 2008 (see Note 3)
*** 975,000
options were terminated in July 2008 (see Note 3)
36
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss. The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as
follows (in thousands):
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Net
unrealized loss on available-for-sale-securities
|
$
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
||||
Net
unrealized (loss) gain on interest rate swap
|
(1,147
|
)
|
33
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss before tax
|
(1,147
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
||||
Accumulated
income tax benefit (expense) related to items of other comprehensive
income
|
480
|
(14
|
)
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
$
|
(667
|
)
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
3. Acquisition
of minority interest in Five Star
On June
26, 2008, the Company, Five Star and NPDV Acquisition Corp., a newly-formed
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“NPDV”), entered into a Tender Offer and
Merger Agreement (the “Tender Offer Agreement”). Pursuant to the
Tender Offer Agreement, on July 24, 2008, NPDV commenced a tender offer to
acquire all the outstanding shares of Five Star common stock not held by the
Company or NPDV at a purchase price of $0.40 per share, net to the seller in
cash, without interest thereon and less any required withholding taxes (the
“Tender Offer”).
The
Tender Offer expired on August 26, 2008, and on August 28, 2008, NPDV merged
with and into Five Star (the “NPDV-Five Star Merger”) with Five Star continuing
as the surviving corporation, wholly-owned by the Company. Each
share of Five Star common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective
time of the NPDV-Five Star Merger (other than shares held by the Company, Five
Star or NPDV, all of which were cancelled and retired and ceased to exist), were
converted in the NPDV-Five Star Merger into the right to receive the price paid
pursuant to the Tender Offer, in cash. The Company paid approximately $1,028,000
for the tendered shares, $661,000 for the remaining outstanding shares pursuant
to the merger and incurred expenses related to the NPDV-Five Star Merger of
approximately $642,000. The total purchase price for the 17.7%
minority interest was $2,331,000. The excess ($642,000) of purchase price over
the book value of the minority interest has been recorded as customer lists.
This intangible asset is being amortized over a five year
period. Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 was
$43,000.
In
addition, concurrently with the execution of the Tender Offer Agreement, the
Company and Five Star entered into letter agreements with certain executive
officers, employees and directors of Five Star, certain of whom are also
directors and executive officers of the Company (collectively the “Letter
Agreements”), pursuant to which such persons received cash payments of
approximately $182,000, in exchange for the termination of their vested and
unvested options to purchase shares of Five Star common stock and unvested
shares of Five Star restricted stock promptly following the completion of the
NPDV-Five Star Merger, which was recorded as a charge to Additional paid-in
capital.
Further,
the termination of the agreements related to the options and shares resulted in
$489,000 of previously unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested
share-based compensation arrangements of Five Star which was charged to
operations in 2008.
Prior to
the commencement of the Tender Offer, in accordance with the Tender Offer
Agreement, (i) the Company transferred to NPDV: (A) all of the shares of Five
Star common stock held by the Company (representing a 75% interest) and (B) a
convertible note issued by Five Star’s wholly-owned subsidiary, and (ii) NPDV
converted such note into an aggregate of 7,000,000 shares of Five Star common
stock, increasing the Company’s indirect ownership interest in Five Star to
82.3%.
37
4. Discontinued
Operation - Sale of Assets of MXL Industries
On June
19, 2008, pursuant to the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of June
16, 2008, by and among the Company, MXL Industries, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company (“MXL Industries” or the “Seller”), MXL Operations,
Inc. (“MXL Operations”), MXL Leasing, LP (“MXL Leasing”) and MXL Realty, LP
(“MXL Realty” and, collectively with MXL Operations and MXL Leasing, the “MXL
Buyers”), the MXL Buyers purchased substantially all the assets and assumed
certain liabilities of Seller’s optical plastics molding and precision coating
businesses (the “MXL Business”). As consideration, the Seller
received approximately $5,200,000 in cash, of which approximately $2,200,000 was
utilized to fully pay bank debt of MXL Industries. The sale resulted
in a gain of $87,000, net of $143,000 of related expenses.
The
Seller also made an aggregate investment in the MXL Buyers of $275,000,
allocated to each of MXL Operations, MXL Leasing and MXL Realty in a manner so
that, as of the effective time of the transaction, the Seller has a 19.9%
interest in the total capital of each of MXL Leasing and MXL Realty and a 40.95%
non-voting interest in the total capital of MXL Operations. MXL
Operations issued additional shares before December 31, 2008 which reduced the
Seller’s interest in MXL Operations to 19.9%. The Company accounts for the
investment in MXL Operations, MXL Leasing and MXL Realty under the cost method
from the date of sale.
Investors
in the MXL Buyers include certain senior managers of the MXL
Business.
The
results for MXL Industries have been accounted for as a discontinued operation.
Sales of MXL amounted to $4,052,000 in 2008 and $9,174,000 in 2007.
Assets
and liabilities of the discontinued operation included in consolidated balance
sheet at December 31, 2007 are summarized as follows (in
thousands):
Current
assets (including $755 of inventories and $1,453 of accounts
receivable)
|
$ | 2,924 | ||
Non
current assets (including $2,587 of property, plant and equipment,
net)
|
2,609 | |||
Total
assets
|
5,533 | |||
Current
liabilities (including $625 of short-term borrowings)
|
(1,444 | ) | ||
Non
current liabilities (including $1,441 long-term debt net of $257 current
maturities)
|
(1,709 | ) | ||
Net
assets
|
$ | 2,380 |
5. Acquisition
of Right-Way Dealer Warehouse
On April
5, 2007, Five Star acquired substantially all the assets of Right-Way Dealer
Warehouse, Inc. (“Right-Way”) for approximately $3,200,000 in cash and the
assumption of liabilities in the approximate amount of $50,000. Transaction
costs of approximately $200,000 were incurred by Five Star. The assets consisted
primarily of approximately $1,186,000 of accounts receivable at fair value and
approximately $2,213,000 of inventory at fair value. The acquisition included
all of Right-Way’s Brooklyn Cash & Carry business and
operations. Five Star acquired the assets of Right-Way in order to
increase its presence and market share in its current geographic
area.
38
The
results of operations of Right-Way are included in the consolidated financial
statements from the date of acquisition. The following unaudited pro
forma consolidated amounts give effect to the acquisition of Right-Way as if it
had occurred on January 1, 2007. Right-Way had filed for reorganization under
Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act prior to the acquisition by Five
Star. The pro forma results of operations have been prepared for
comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the operating
results that would have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of
the above date, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating
results.
Year ended December 31,
2007
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
||||
Sales
|
$ | 137,221 | ||
Net
income
|
11,359 | |||
Earnings from
continuing operations per share basic and fully diluted
|
$ | 0.65 |
6. Inventories
Inventories
are comprised of the following (in thousands):
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Raw
materials *
|
$
|
$
|
410
|
|||||
Work
in process *
|
141
|
|||||||
Finished
goods
|
23,045
|
27,169
|
||||||
$
|
23,045
|
$
|
27,720
|
* Relate
to MXL
7. Investment
in Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Indevus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Indevus”) is a biopharmaceutical company that engages in
the acquisition, development, and commercialization of products to treat
urological, gynecological, and men’s health conditions.
Effective
April 18, 2007 (the “Indevus Effective Time”), all of the outstanding common
stock of Valera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Valera”), a Delaware corporation in
which the Company had owned 2,070,670 shares of common stock at such time, was
acquired by Indevus pursuant to the terms and conditions of an Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of December 11, 2006 (the “Valera Merger
Agreement”). As a result, the 2,070,670 shares of Valera common stock held
by the Company at the Indevus Effective Time were converted into an aggregate of
2,347,518 shares of Indevus common stock at such time.
In April
2007, the Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $14,961,000 resulting from the
exchange of shares. On May 3, 2007, Indevus announced that it had received
FDA approval for Supprelin-LA. Therefore, in May 2007, as a result of
contingent rights received in the Valera Merger Agreement, the Company received,
291,964 shares of Indevus common stock, and recognized an additional pre-tax
gain of $2,070,670. The Company is entitled to two additional
contingent tranches of shares of Indevus common stock, to the extent certain
milestones with respect to specific product candidates are achieved. If each of
the contingent milestones is achieved, the Company would receive up to
$5,176,675 worth of Indevus common stock on the date the milestone is met, at
which date additional gain will be recognized. During the year ended December
31, 2007, the Company sold 2,639,482 shares of Indevus on the open market,
(which comprised all the Company’s shares of Indevus common stock at this time)
for total net proceeds of $17,598,000 and recognized losses of $1,023,000, which
are included in Investment and other income (loss), net.
39
On March
23, 2009, Indevus filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC announcing the
completion of an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Endo Merger Agreement”) with
Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Endo”) and BTB
Purchaser Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Endo,
pursuant to which Endo acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of the
common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Indevus. As a part of
the merger transaction, certain contingent rights to receive shares of Indevus
common stock upon FDA approval of two drug applications, acquired by the Company
in April 2007, were converted into the right to receive a cash
payment. This cash payment is also contingent upon FDA approval of
said drug applications. As a result of the consummation of the Endo
Merger Agreement, the Company has a contingent right to receive from Endo the
following cash payments; (i) upon FDA approval of the uteral stent drug
application on or before specified dates in 2012, of between $2,685,000 and
$2,327,000 depending on the terms contained in the FDA approval and (ii) upon
FDA approval of VP003(Octreotide implant) drug application on or before
specified dates in 2012, of between $4,028,000 and $3,491,000 depending on the
terms contained in the FDA approval. See Note 17(a).
The
original gain on exchange of Valera stock resulted from a tax free
reorganization and accordingly was not subject to current federal income
tax. In addition, the deferred income tax liability attributable to
the excess of accounting basis over tax basis in Indevus stock received in the
exchange was offset by a reduction of the deferred tax asset valuation
allowance. The gain recognized for federal tax purposes on the sale
of Indevus stock was offset by the Company’s net operating and capital loss
carryforwards. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is included
in the accompanying Statement of Operations related to the gain on the exchange
or the sale of the Indevus stock for the year ended December 31,
2007. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recorded a
provision for state income tax expense of approximately $345,000 related to the
gain on the exchange and the sale of the Indevus stock.
8. Investment
and other income (loss), net
Investment
and other income (loss), net is comprised of the following (in
thousands):
Year
Ended
|
||||||||
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Loss
on sale of Indevus
|
$
|
$
|
(1,023
|
)
|
||||
Indevus
profit sharing
|
(680
|
)
|
||||||
Impairment
of Investment in Millenium Cell
|
(138
|
)
|
(346
|
)
|
||||
Interest
income
|
200
|
236
|
||||||
Other
|
32
|
208
|
||||||
$
|
94
|
$
|
(1,605
|
)
|
40
9. Marketable
securities
Marketable
securities, which are carried at market value, is comprised of the Company’s
investment in Millenium Cell Inc. (“Millennium”). Millennium is a publicly
traded emerging technology company engaged in the business of developing
innovative fuel systems for the safe storage, transportation and generation
of hydrogen for use as an energy source. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the
Company owned 364,771 shares of common stock of Millennium with a market
value of $7,000 and $109,000, respectively, representing approximately a 1%
ownership interest, and an unrealized loss of $36,000 in 2007. For the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company considered their investment
to be other than temporarily impaired and accordingly recorded an impairment
loss of $138,000 and $346,000, respectively, related to such
shares.
10. Property,
plant and equipment
Property,
plant and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Land
|
$
|
$
|
90
|
|||||
Buildings
and improvements
|
429
|
2,754
|
||||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
1,041
|
7,033
|
||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
961
|
1,197
|
||||||
2,431
|
11,074
|
|||||||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(1,519
|
)
|
(7,540
|
)
|
||||
$
|
912
|
$
|
3,534
|
Depreciation
expense related to continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 amounting to $423,000 and $400,000, respectively.
11. Short-term
borrowings
On June
27, 2008, Five Star entered into a Restated and Amended Loan and Security
Agreement (the “Amended Loan Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of
America”). The Amended Loan Agreement extends the maturity date of that
certain Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2003, entered into by
Five Star and Bank of America (through its predecessor Fleet Capital
Corporation), as amended (the “2003 Loan Agreement”), until June 30,
2011. The 2003 Loan Agreement, as amended by the Amended Loan Agreement, is
referred to herein as the “Loan Agreement”.
The Loan
Agreement provides Five Star with a $35,000,000 revolving credit facility
(“Revolving Credit Facility”), subject to a $3,500,000 sub-limit for letters of
credit. The Revolving Credit Facility allows Five Star to borrow up
to (a) 85% of eligible receivables plus (b) the greater of (i) the lesser of
$20,000,000 or 65% (to be reduced by 1% per quarter commencing July 1, 2008) of
eligible inventory, or (ii) the lesser of $20,000,000 or 85% of the appraised
net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory minus (c) the amount of
outstanding letter of credit obligations, as those terms are defined
therein. All obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility are
collateralized by first priority liens on all of Five Star’s existing and future
assets.
41
Loans
made to Five Star under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a per
annum rate based on the Base Rate of Bank of America, as defined, plus 2.25%, as
modified, or at a per annum rate based on LIBOR plus 325 basis points, as
modified, at Five Star’s election. The LIBOR and Base Rate
margins are subject to adjustment based on certain performance benchmarks. At
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, approximately $18,375,000 and
$19,303,000 was outstanding under the Loan Agreement and approximately
$3,677,000 and $5,579,000 was available to be borrowed,
respectively. Substantially all of Five Star’s assets are pledged as
collateral for these borrowings.
In
connection with Loan Agreement, on June 30, 2003, Five Star entered an interest
rate swap with the lender which has been designated as cash flow hedge. Under
the swap, effective July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2008, Five Star paid a fixed
interest rate of 3.38% to the Lender on notional principal of $12,000,000. In
return, the Lender paid to Five Star a floating rate, namely, LIBOR, on the same
notional principal amount. The credit spread of 1.5% was paid in addition to the
3.38%.
In
connection with the Amended Loan Agreement, Five Star also entered into a
derivative transaction with Bank of America. The derivative
transaction is an interest rate swap and has been designated as a cash flow
hedge. Effective June 30, 2008 through June 30, 2011, Five Star will
pay a fixed interest rate of 3.62% to Bank of America on notional principal of
$20,000,000. In return, Bank of America will pay to Five Star a
floating rate, namely, LIBOR, on the same notional principal
amount. The credit spread under the Amended Loan Agreement is not
included in, and will be paid in addition to this fixed interest rate of
3.62%. The fair value of the interest rate swap amounted to a
liability of $1,111,000 at December 31, 2008 and an asset of $69,000 at December
31, 2007. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap were recognized in
other comprehensive income.
Under the
Loan Agreement, Five Star is subject to covenants, as amended, requiring minimum
net worth, limitations on losses, if any, and minimum or maximum values for
certain financial ratios. As of December
31, 2008, Five Star was in compliance with these covenants. The
Company anticipates being in violation of its original fixed charge coverage
ratio during 2009, and therefore Bank of America has amended the quarterly
ratios through the quarter ended March 31, 2010. There is no
assurance that Five Star can comply with these covenants in future
quarters.
42
12. Income
taxes
For the
year ended December 31, 2007, the Company filed a consolidated federal
income tax return with its subsidiaries, except for Five Star, which was
less than 80% owned and filed its own separate consolidated federal income
tax return. In July 2008, Five Star became more than 80% owned by the
Company and in August 2008, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company. As such, the Company will include Five Star in its
consolidated federal income tax return for the year ended December 31, 2008,
which will include activity of Five Star since July 2008. In
addition, the Company and Five Star file separate state and local income
tax returns.
The
components of income tax expense related to continued operations are as follows
(in thousands):
Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Current
|
||||||||
Federal
|
$ | 83 | $ | 348 | ||||
State
and local
|
4 | 495 | ||||||
Total
current
|
87 | 843 | ||||||
Deferred
|
||||||||
Federal
|
(956 | ) | 357 | |||||
State
and local
|
(71 | ) | 69 | |||||
Total
deferred
|
(1,027 | ) | 426 | |||||
Total
income tax expense (benefit)
|
$ | (940 | ) | $ | 1,269 |
The
deferred tax expense (benefit) excludes activity in the net deferred
tax asset relating to tax on appreciation (depreciation) in
available-for-sale securities and the interest rate swap, which is recorded
directly to stockholders’ equity.
The
difference between the (benefit) expense for income taxes computed at
the statutory rate and the reported amount of tax expense (benefit) is as
follows:
Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Federal
income tax rate
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
34.0
|
%
|
||||
State
and local taxes, net of federal effect
|
2.5
|
2.9
|
||||||
Non-deductible
expenses
|
7.5
|
0.3
|
||||||
Benefit
from increase in ownership of Five Star
|
(6.1
|
)
|
||||||
Increase
in valuation allowance
|
9.6
|
(27.8
|
)
|
|||||
Effective
tax rate
|
(20.5)
|
%
|
9.4
|
%
|
43
The tax
effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting and
tax bases of assets and liabilities that are included in the net deferred
tax asset are summarized as follows (in thousands):
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Deferred tax
assets:
|
||||||||
Property
and equipment
|
$
|
342
|
$
|
285
|
||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
170
|
89
|
||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
56
|
507
|
||||||
Marketable
securities
|
7
|
165
|
||||||
Interest
rate swap
|
451
|
|
||||||
Net
operating loss carryforward
|
2,105
|
1,173
|
||||||
Charitable
contributions carryforward
|
7
|
|
||||||
Inventory
|
93
|
67
|
||||||
Equity-based
compensation
|
508
|
17
|
||||||
Alternative
minimum tax credit carryforward
|
172
|
|
||||||
Gross deferred tax
assets
|
3,911
|
2,303
|
||||||
Less:
valuation allowance
|
(2,242
|
)
|
(1,805
|
)
|
||||
Deferred tax assets after
valuation allowance
|
1,669
|
498
|
||||||
Deferred tax
liabilities:
|
|
|
||||||
Investment
in subsidiary
|
|
279
|
||||||
Interest
rate swap
|
|
28
|
||||||
Deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
307
|
||||||
Net deferred tax
asset
|
1,669
|
191
|
As a
result of the increase in ownership of Five Star and the ability to file a
consolidated tax return, the excess of the financial reporting basis over tax
basis in Five Star was no longer considered to be a taxable temporary difference
and accordingly, the related deferred tax liability of $279,000 was eliminated
and reflected as a deferred tax benefit in 2008.
As of
December 31, 2008, the Company has federal net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $6,200,000, which expire from 2017 to 2028, and alternative
minimum tax credit carryforwards of approximately $200,000 which do not
expire.
A
valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some
portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. The valuation allowance
increased by approximately $400,000 during the year ended December 31, 2008, and
decreased by approximately $2,900,000 during the year ended December 31,
2007.
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes (an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109)” (“FIN
48”). This interpretation was issued in July 2006 to clarify the uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in the financial statements by prescribing a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. As
required by FIN 48, the Company applied the “more-likely-than-not” recognition
threshold to all tax positions, commencing at the adoption date, which resulted
in no unrecognized tax benefits reflected in the accompanying financial
statements. Pursuant to FIN 48, the Company has opted to classify interest and
penalties that would accrue according to the provisions of relevant tax law as
interest and other expense, respectively, in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
44
The
Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various
states. For federal income tax purposes, the 2005 through 2008 tax years remain
open for examination by the tax authorities under the normal three year statute
of limitations. For state tax purposes, the 2004 through 2008 tax years remain
open for examination by the tax authorities under a four year statute of
limitations.
13. Capital
Stock
The
Company’s Board of Directors without any vote or action by the holders of common
stock is authorized to issue preferred stock from time to time in one or
more series and to determine the number of shares and to fix the powers,
designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other
special rights of any series of preferred stock.
On
December 15, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the Company
to repurchase up to 2,000,000 shares, or approximately 11%, of its
outstanding shares of common stock from time to time either in open market
or privately negotiated transactions. On August 13, 2008, the Company’s
Board of Directors authorized an increase of 2,000,000 common shares to be
repurchased. At December 31, 2008, the Company had repurchased 1,791,321 shares
of its common stock for $4,092,000 and, a total of 2,208,679 shares remained
available for repurchase.
14. Incentive
stock plans and stock based compensation
The
Company has a stock-based compensation plan for employees and non-employee
members of its Board of Directors. The plan provides for discretionary grants of
stock options, restricted stock shares, and other stock-based awards. The
Company’s plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors, which consists solely of non-employee directors.
On
November 3, 2003, GP Strategies, which at the time was the Company’s sole
stockholder, adopted an Incentive Stock Plan (the “2003 Plan”) under
which 1,750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock are available for grant to
employees, directors and outside service providers. The 2003 Plan
permits awards of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options,
restricted stock, stock units, performance shares, performance units and other
incentives payable in cash or in shares of the Company common
stock. The term of any option granted under the 2003 Plan will not
exceed ten years from the date of grant and, in the case of incentive stock
options granted to a 10% or greater holder in the total voting stock of the
Company, three years from the date of grant. The exercise price of
any option granted under the 2003 Plan may not be less than the fair market
value of the common stock on the date of grant or, in the case of incentive
stock options granted to a 10% or greater holder in the total voting stock, 110%
of such fair market value.
On March
1, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved and adopted an amendment,
subject to stockholder approval (the “Amendment”), to the 2003 Plan (the “2003
Plan Amendment”) increasing the aggregate number of shares of Company common
stock issuable under the 2003 Plan from 1,750,000 shares to 3,500,000 shares
(subject to adjustment as provided in the 2003 Plan), and increasing the per
person annual limitation in the 2003 Plan from 250,000 shares to 2,500,000
shares. The 2003 Plan Amendment was approved in December 2007 at the
Company’s 2007 Annual Stockholders Meeting.
In March
2007, the Company granted an aggregate of 3,200,000 nonqualified stock options
to officers and directors under the 2003 Plan, of which 632,830 were granted
under the terms of the 2003 Plan as had then been approved by the Company’s
stockholders and the remainder were granted subject to stockholder approval of
the 2003 Plan Amendment. The Company determined the estimated
aggregate fair value of the 632,830 options that were not subject to stockholder
approval on the date of grant and upon stockholder approval, which under
SFAS 123R is considered the date of grant, determined the estimated aggregate
fair value of the remaining 2,567,170 options. On July 30, 2007, the Company
granted an aggregate of 150,000 non-qualified stock options under the 2003
Plan. The stock options granted on July 30, 2007 were not subject to
stockholder approval of the 2003 Plan Amendment. The Company recorded
compensation expense related to the above option grants of $916,000 and $771,000
for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
45
On July
30, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the National Patent Development
Corporation 2007 Incentive Stock Plan (the “2007 NPDC Plan”), subject to
stockholder approval. The 2007 NPDC Plan was approved by the
Company’s stockholders in December 2007 at the Company’s 2007 Annual
Stockholders Meeting. As of December 31, 2008, no awards have been
granted under the 2007 NPDC Plan. As of December 31, 2008, the number
of shares of common stock reserved and available for awards under the 2007 NPDC
Plan (subject to certain adjustments as provided therein) is
7,500,000.
Information
with respect to the Company’s outstanding stock options at the beginning and end
of 2008 is presented below. There was no stock option activity under the
plans in 2008.
Stock
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
||||||||
Options
outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
3,350,000
|
$
|
2.49
|
8.9
|
$
|
768,000*
|
|||||
Options
outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
3,350,000
|
2.49
|
7.9
|
$
|
0
*
|
||||||
Options
exercisable at December 31, 2008
|
1,250,000
|
$
|
2.45
|
7.9
|
$
|
0
*
|
|
*
|
The
intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value
of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the
option.
|
The
weighted average grant-date fair value of the options granted during year ended
December 31, 2007 was $0.82 per share.
As of
December 31, 2008, there was $1,062,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested options. This cost is expected to be recognized over the
vesting periods of the options, which on a weighted-average basis is
approximately 1.2 years.
The fair
value of each option award granted during 2007 was estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following
weighted-average assumptions:
Dividend
yield
|
0 | % | ||
Expected
volatility
|
46.90 | % | ||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
3.46 | % | ||
Expected
life (in years)
|
4 |
The
Company took into consideration guidance contained in SFAS No. 123R and SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB No. 107”) when reviewing and developing
assumptions for the 2007 grants. The weighted average expected life for 2007
grants of 4 years reflects the alternative simplified method permitted by SAB
No. 107, which defines the expected life as average of the contractual term of
the option and the weighted-average vesting period for all option tranches.
Expected volatility for the 2007 options grants is based on historical
volatility over the same number of years as the expected life, prior to option
grant date.
46
As a
result of the NPDV-Five Star Merger (see Note 3), all vested and unvested
options and restricted stock granted under the Five Star plan were cancelled for
a cash payment of $182,000. In 2008 and 2007, Five Star recognized
compensation expense related to the terminated options and restricted stock of
$589,000 and $463,000, respectively.
15. Other
benefit plans
Five
Star Employee Benefit Plan
Five Star
maintains a 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”) for employees who have
completed one year of service. The Savings Plan permits pre-tax contributions to
the Savings Plan of 2% to 50% of compensation by participants pursuant to
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Five Star matches 40% of the
participants’ first 6% of compensation contributed, not to exceed an amount
equivalent to 2.4% of that participant’s compensation.
The
Savings Plan is administered by a trustee appointed by the Board of Directors of
Five Star and all contributions are held by the trustee and invested at the
participants’ directions in various mutual funds. Five Star’s expense associated
with the Savings Plan was approximately $142,000 and $137,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
MXL
Employee Benefit Plan
NPDC
Holdings, Inc. (formerly MXL Industries) maintains a 401(k) Savings Plan, the
MXL Industries, Inc. Retirement and Savings Plan (the “MXL Plan”), for
employees who have completed at least one hour of service coincident with
the first day of each month. The MXL Plan permits pre-tax contributions by
participants. The Company matches up to 50% of the participants’ first 7%
of compensation contributed. The Company also matched participants’
contributions in shares of Company common stock through August 28, 2008, and
subsequent to that date, matched in cash, which totaled $2,000 in
2008. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
the Company contributed 10,260 and 19,161 shares of Company’s common stock with
a value of approximately $25,000 and $48,000, respectively as a matching
contribution to the MXL Plan.
16. Commitments
and Contingencies
(a) |
Five Star has
several noncancellable leases for real property and machinery
and equipment. Such leases expire at various dates with, in some
cases, options to extend their terms. As of December 31, 2008,
minimum rentals under long-term operating leases are as follows (in
thousands):
|
Real
Property
|
Machinery
&
Equipment
|
Total
|
||||||||||
2009
|
$
|
2,463
|
$
|
760
|
$
|
3,223
|
||||||
2010
|
841
|
367
|
1,208
|
|||||||||
2011
|
280
|
136
|
416
|
|||||||||
2012
|
70
|
70
|
||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
3,654
|
$
|
1,263
|
$
|
4,917
|
47
Several of the
leases contain provisions for rent escalation based primarily
on increases in real estate taxes and operating costs incurred by the
lessor. Rent expense was approximately $3,676,000, and $3,964,000 for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. GP
Strategies and the Company have guaranteed the leases for Five Star’s
New Jersey and Connecticut warehouses, having annual rentals of
approximately $2,150,000 and expiring in the first quarter of 2010.
In March 2009, the landlord of the Connecticut facility released GP
Strategies from its guarantee, and accepted the guarantee from the
Company. The landlord at Five Star’s Connecticut facility has
the option to cancel the lease if there is a signed contract to sell
the building, upon six months written notice.
|
|
(b) |
In connection with
its land investments, the Company has certain ownership interests in
several dams and related reservoirs located in the State of
Connecticut. Under relevant Connecticut law, the Company is
responsible for maintaining the safety of these dams. The
Company has been notified by certain landowners adjoining one of the
reservoirs that the water level in the reservoir has decreased; allegedly
causing harm to such landowners. While the Company is currently
investigating the cause of the decline in the water level, it does not
presently know the cause of the decrease in water level or have any
reasonable estimation of the cost of repairs, if any, that may be
required. Further, the Company cannot presently determine the
extent of its legal liability, if any, with respect to the
landowners. The Company has not received any claims with
respect to any of the other reservoirs. The Company cannot
reasonably estimate at this time the costs which may be incurred with
respect to this matter and while these costs could be material to the
Company’s results of operations in the period incurred, based upon the
present state of its knowledge, the Company has no reason to believe that
these costs will be material to its financial position. No
amounts have been provided for this matter in the accompanying financial
statements.
|
(c) |
In 2001, GP
Strategies initiated legal proceedings in connection with its 1998
acquisition of Learning Technologies from various subsidiaries
(“Systemhouse”) of MCI Communications Corporation (“MCI”) which were
subsequently acquired by Electronic Data Systems Corporation (“EDS”). The
action against MCI was stayed as a result of MCI’s bankruptcy filing in
2002. GP Strategies settled its claims against EDS and Systemhouse in
2005, but continued to have a claim in bankruptcy against MCI as an
unsecured creditor. In September 2008, the Bankruptcy Court approved a
settlement between GP Strategies and MCI which allowed GP Strategies a
Class 6 General Unsecured Claim (as defined in MCI’s Modified Second
Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code) in the amount of $1,700,000 (the “Allowed
Claim”). The Allowed Claim was satisfied in December 2008
through the distribution of $337,000 in cash and shares of stock of
Verizon Communications Inc. valued at $226,000 on the distribution
date. In connection with the spin-off of the Company, GP Strategies
agreed to contribute to the Company 50% of the proceeds received, net of
legal fees and taxes, with respect to the MCI claims. No contribution has
been reflected in the accompanying financial statements for the Company’s
share of the Allocated Claim, which will be recorded as capital
contribution when received.
|
(d)
|
Contingencies |
The notes issued by
GP Strategies with an outstanding balance of $2,885,000 at December 31,
2007 were secured by a non-recourse mortgage on the property located in
Pawling, New York, which was transferred to MXL. GP Strategies had
indemnified the Company for loss of the property value in case of
foreclosure of the mortgage for payment of the note. GP Strategies has
settled its obligations under the note in August 2008 and the non-recourse
mortgage was canceled.
|
48
17. | Related party transactions |
(a)
|
On
November 12, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement to borrow
approximately $1,022,000 from Bedford Oak Partners, which is controlled by
Harvey P. Eisen, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the
Company, and approximately $568,000 from Jerome I. Feldman, who was at the
time Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, which was
utilized to exercise an option held by the Company to purchase Series B
Convertible Preferred shares of Valera. The loans bore interest
at 6% per annum, matured on October 31, 2009, and were secured by all
shares of Valera owned by the Company, including the purchased
shares. On January 11, 2005, the Company
prepaid the loans and all accrued interest in full. As further
consideration for making these loans, Bedford Oak Partners and Mr. Feldman
became entitled to a portion of the consideration received by the Company
on the sale of certain Valera shares. As a result of the
acquisition of Valera by Indevus (see Note 7), this obligation related to
the sale of Indevus shares by the Company. From June 2007 through and
including September 12, 2007, the Company sold, in a series of open market
transactions, all of the 2,639,482 shares of Indevus common stock held by
the Company for an aggregate of approximately $17,598,000, net of
commissions and brokerage fees. The November 12, 2004 agreement
among the Company, Bedford Oak Partners and Mr. Feldman provides for
Bedford Oak Partners and Mr. Feldman to (i) receive 50% of any amount in
excess of $3.47 per share which is received by the Company upon the sale
of Indevus common stock and (ii) participate in 50% of the profits earned
on 19.51% of shares of Indevus common stock received by the Company upon
conversion of the contingent rights, described below, if any, at such time
as such shares are sold by the Company. The aggregate amount
paid towards the profit sharing in 2007 was $922,000 of which $680,000 is
included in Investment and other income (loss), net for the year ended
December 31 2007 and $242,000 had been accrued at December 31,
2006.
|
As
a result of the consummation of the Endo Merger Agreement (see Note 7),
the Company has a contingent right to receive from Endo certain cash
payments. The two related parties would receive the following portions of
the Company’s cash payments: (i) upon FDA approval of the uteral stent
between $262,000 and $227,000, and (ii) upon FDA approval of
VP003 (Octreotide implant), between $393,000 and
$341,000.
|
(b)
|
Concurrently
with its spin-off from GP Strategies, the Company and GP Strategies
entered into a management agreement under which certain of the Company’s
executive officers who were also executive officers of GP Strategies were
paid by GP Strategies subject to reimbursement by the Company.
Additionally, GP Strategies provided support with respect to corporate
federal and state income taxes, corporate legal services, corporate
secretarial administrative support, and executive management
consulting. The agreement terminated on November 24,
2007.
|
Expenses
of $335,000 incurred by the Company under this agreement for the
year ended December 31, 2007, which includes approximately 80% of the
cost of the compensation and benefits required to be provided by GP
Strategies to Jerome Feldman, who served as the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer until May 31, 2007.
|
|
Scott
N. Greenberg, a director of the Company, serves as the Chief Executive
Officer and a director of GP Strategies. Harvey P. Eisen, the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, also serves as
the non-executive Chairman of the Board of GP
Strategies.
|
(c)
|
On
April 5, 2007, Five Star, in connection with its acquisition of Right-Way
(see Note 5), entered into a lease for a warehouse with a company
owned by the former principal of Right-Way who presently serves as an
executive of Five Star. The lease has an initial term of five years with
two successive five-year renewal options and provides for an annual rent
of $325,000, subject to adjustment. The adjusted rent expense for the 12
months commencing January 1, 2009 will be $280,000. Rent expense for the
warehouse for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $325,000 and
$217,000 respectively. Five Star also has an option to
purchase the warehouse at any time during the initial term of the lease
for $7,750,000, subject to 3% annual
adjustment.
|
49
18. | Stockholders equity |
|
|
(a)
|
Mr. S.
Leslie Flegel was named a director of the Company on March 2, 2007 and on
March 1, 2007 was appointed as Chairman and elected as a director of Five
Star. Effective March 2, 2007, Mr. Flegel entered into a
three-year agreement with Five Star (the “FS Agreement”) which provided
for an annual fee of $100,000 and reimbursement (i) for all travel
expenses incurred in connection with his performance of services for Five
Star and (ii) beginning in November 2007, for up to $125,000 per year of
the cost of maintaining an office. In addition, pursuant to the FS
Agreement, Mr. Flegel was issued 2,000,000 shares of Five Star common
stock, all of which were fully vested upon issuance and not subject to
forfeiture. The 2,000,000 shares were valued at $720,000 based
on the closing price of Five Star common stock on March 2, 2007. Such
amount was to be charged to compensation expense over the term of the FS
Agreement. At December 31, 2007, the unrecognized compensation was
$520,000, of which $240,000 was included in Prepaid expenses and other
current assets and $280,000 was included in Other assets. In addition, the
Company recognized a gain of $1,000 on the reduction in ownership interest
of Five Star at the time of
issuance.
|
|
On
March 2, 2007, the Company and Mr. Flegel entered into an agreement
pursuant to which the Company sold to Mr. Flegel 200,000 shares of Company
common stock for $480,000 ($2.40 per share). The agreement gave
Mr. Flegel the right to exchange any or all of the 200,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock into shares of Five Star common stock held by the
Company at the fixed rate of six shares of Five Star common stock for each
share of Company common stock. The value of the option to convert the
shares of Company common stock held by Mr. Flegel into shares of Five
Star common stock which amounted to $264,000, was valued using a
Black Scholes formula and recognized as compensation expense by Five Star
over the three year term of the FS Agreement. During the year ended
December 31, 2007 Five Star recognized $73,000 of such compensation
expense. In addition, as the exchange rights, if exercised, would require
the Company to effectively surrender net assets to redeem common stock,
the Company accounted for the issuance of the 200,000 shares of Company
common stock as temporary equity at an amount equivalent to the carrying
value of Five Star’s equity that could be acquired by the holder of such
shares ($493,000 at December 31,
2007).
|
|
On
March 25, 2008, Mr. Flegel resigned as director and Chairman of the Board
of Five Star, and as a director of the Company, effective
immediately. In connection with Mr. Flegel’s resignation, Five
Star, the Company and Mr. Flegel entered into an agreement, dated March
25, 2008, pursuant to which Mr. Flegel sold to the Company (i) 200,000
shares of Company common stock, which was exchangeable into 1,200,000
shares of Five Star common stock owned by the Company, at $3.60 per share,
which equates to $0.60 per share of Five Star common stock had Mr. Flegel
exercised his right to exchange these shares of Company common
stock into shares of Five Star common stock and (ii) 1,698,336 shares of
Five Star common stock at $0.60 per share. In addition, Mr.
Flegel’s children and grandchildren sold to the Company an additional
301,664 shares Five Star common stock that they had received from Mr.
Flegel at $0.60 per share. The market value of Company common stock
on March 25, 2008 was $2.40 per share. The excess cash paid of
$1.20 per share over the market value on the 200,000 shares of Company
common stock purchased from Mr. Flegel, or $240,000, was deemed to be the
settlement of the option to exchange Company common stock for Five
Star common stock and was charged to Additional paid-in capital. Five Star
recorded a compensation charge of $1,096,000 in 2008 related to the above
transactions, including the unrecognized value of the 2,000,000 shares of
Five Star common stock issued and the option to convert the 200,000 shares
of Company common stock discussed above. In addition, the
expense included $440,000, which represents the excess of the purchase
price over the quoted market price of the 2,000,000 shares of Five Star
common stock on the date of the agreement to acquire such shares. As a
result of the repurchase of the 200,000 shares of Company stock, which
were also convertible into Five Star shares, the carrying value of the
Company’s shares was reclassified from temporary to permanent
equity.
|
50
|
The
agreement also contained one-year non-compete, standstill and
non-solicitation provisions. In addition, the three year FS Agreement was
terminated upon his resignation.
|
(b)
|
On
August 11, 2008, the Company, The Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund, The
Gabelli Equity Income Fund, The Gabelli ABC Fund and The Gabelli
Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc. (collectively, the
“Warrantholders”), holders of warrants to purchase an aggregate of
1,423,886 shares of Company common stock, dated as of December 3, 2004
(the “Warrants”), amended the Warrants to (i) extend the
expiration date of the Warrants from August 14, 2008 to August 15, 2008
and (ii) reduce the exercise price of the Warrants from $3.57 per share to
$2.50, per share, which was in excess of the closing price on August 11,
2008. On August 13, 2008, the Warrantholders exercised the
warrants and the Company issued and sold 1,423,886 shares of treasury
stock to the Warrantholders for cash consideration of $2.50 per share,
representing an aggregate purchase price of
$3,560,000.
|
19. Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
5,021
|
$
|
8,051
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
2,139
|
3,846
|
||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
1,074
|
785
|
||||||
Other
|
2
|
848
|
||||||
$
|
8,236
|
$
|
13,530
|
20. Valuation
and qualifying accounts
The
following is a summary of the allowance for doubtful accounts related to
accounts receivable for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (in
thousands):
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Balance
at beginning of year
|
$
|
412
|
$
|
566
|
||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
279
|
123
|
||||||
Elimination
of MXL allowance in connection with sale of its assets (Note
4)
|
(192
|
)
|
||||||
Uncollectible
accounts written off, net of recoveries
|
(79
|
)
|
(277
|
)
|
||||
Balance
at end of year
|
$
|
420
|
$
|
412
|
*
|
*
Includes $141 applicable to MXL
51
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
“Disclosure
controls and procedures” are the controls and other procedures of an issuer that
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer
in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC’s rules and forms. These controls and procedures are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by an issuer in its Exchange Act reports is
accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal
executive and financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
The
Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, with the
assistance of other members of the Company’s management, have evaluated the
effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
the Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) as of December 31, 2008. Based on
such evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal
financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of such time.
The
Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have also
concluded that there have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2008 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management
of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f)). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting
is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management
of the Company, including its principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making this
assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control
— Integrated Framework.
Based on
their assessment using those criteria, management concluded that, as of December
31, 2008, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is
effective.
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered
public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the
Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the
SEC that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this annual
report.
52
Item
9B. Other Information
None.
PART
III
The
information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s
Proxy Statement for its 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the captions
[“Directors and Executive Officers”], [“Corporate Governance”], [“Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act”], [“Code of Ethics”] and [“Audit
Committee.”]
The
information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the
Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
under the caption [“Executive Compensation.”]
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The
following table provides information as of December 31, 2008 with respect to
shares of Company common stock that may be issued under existing equity
compensation plans.
Plan
category
|
Number
of securities
to
be issued upon
exercise
of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
(a)
|
Weighted-average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
(b)
|
Number
of securities
remaining
available
for future
issuance
under
equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected
in column (a))
(c)
|
Equity
compensation
plans
approved by
security
holders (1)
|
3,350,000
|
$2.49
|
7,650,000
|
Equity
compensation
plans
not approved by
security
holders
|
―
|
―
|
―
|
Total
|
3,350,000
|
$2.49
|
7,650,000
|
53
(1)
|
Consists
of (i) the 2003 Stock Plan, as amended, which was originally adopted by
the Board of Directors and approved by the sole stockholder of the Company
on November 3, 2003 and the amendment to which was approved by the Board
of Directors of the Company on March 1, 2007 and by the stockholders of
the Company on December 20, 2007; and (ii) the 2007 Incentive Stock Plan,
which was approved by the Board of Directors on July 30, 2007 and by the
stockholders of the Company on December 20,
2007.
|
Additional
information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the
Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the
caption [“Stock Ownership of Management and Principal
Stockholders”].
This
information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the
Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under
the captions [“Certain Transactions with Management”] and [“Director
Independence”].
The
information regarding principal accountant fees and services and the
Company’s pre-approval policies and procedures for audit and
non-audit services provided by the Company’s independent accountants is
incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2009
Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption [“Principal Accountant
Fees and Services.”]
54
PART
IV
Item
15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) The
following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data:
Page
|
|
Financial
Statements of National Patent Development Corporation and
Subsidiaries:
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
24
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations - Years ended December 31,
2008
and 2007
|
25
|
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Years
ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
26
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets - December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
27
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended December 31,
2008
and 2007
|
28
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity – Years
ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
30
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
32
|
(a)(2)
|
Schedules
have been omitted because they are not required or are not applicable, or
the required information has been included in the financial statements or
the notes thereto.
|
(a)(3) See
accompanying Index to Exhibits
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
NATIONAL
PATENT DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
|
||||
Date: March
30, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ HARVEY
P. EISEN
|
||
Name:
|
Harvey
P. Eisen
|
|||
Title:
|
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
Capacity
|
Date
|
|
/s/
HARVEY P. EISEN
|
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
March
30, 2009
|
|
Harvey
P. Eisen
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
/s/
JOHN C. BELKNAP
|
Vice
President and Director
|
March
30, 2009
|
|
John
C. Belknap
|
|||
/s/
LAWRENCE G. SCHAFRAN
|
Director
|
March
30, 2009
|
|
Lawrence
G. Schafran
|
|||
/s/
TALTON R. EMBRY
|
Director
|
March
30, 2009
|
|
Talton
R. Embry
|
|||
/s/
SCOTT N. GREENBERG
|
Director
|
March
30, 2009
|
|
Scott
N. Greenberg
|
|||
/s/
IRA J. SOBOTKO
|
Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer
|
March
30, 2009
|
|
Ira
J. Sobotko
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
56
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
||
2
|
Form
of Distribution Agreement between GP Strategies Corporation and the
Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Registrant’s Form S-1, Registration No. 333-118568 filed with the SEC on
August 26, 2004)
|
||
3
|
(i)
|
Form
of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of National Patent
Development Corporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to the Registrant’s Form S-1, Registration No. 333-118568 filed with the
SEC on August 26, 2004)
|
|
3
|
(ii)
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of National Patent Development Corporation
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Form
S-1, Registration No. 333-118568 filed with the SEC on August 26,
2004)
|
|
4.1
|
Form
of certificate representing shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, of National Patent Development Corporation (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form S-1, Registration No.
333-118568 filed with the SEC on August 26, 2004)
|
||
4.2
|
Form
of National Patent Development Corporation Warrant Certificate dated
August 14, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.03 to GP
Strategies Corporation Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed
with the SEC on August 19, 2003)
|
||
10.1
|
#
|
Form
of Management Agreement between GP Strategies Corporation and the
Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Form S-1, Registration No. 333-118568 filed with the SEC on
August 26, 2004)
|
|
10.2
|
#
|
Amendment,
dated July 1, 2005, to the Management Agreement dated July 30, 2004,
between GP Strategies Corporation and the Registrant (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to GP Strategies Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2005 filed with the SEC on August 9,
2005)
|
|
10.3
|
#
|
Form
of Management Agreement between the Registrant and GP Strategies
Corporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant’s Form S-1, Registration No. 333-118568 filed with the SEC on
August 26, 2004)
|
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
||
10.4
|
#
|
Termination
Agreement, dated June 30, 2005, of the Management Agreement dated July 30,
2004, between the Registrant and GP Strategies Corporation (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to GP Strategies Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed with the SEC on August 9,
2005)
|
|
10.5
|
Financing
and Security Agreement dated August 13, 2003 by and between General
Physics Corporation, MXL Industries, Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National
Association (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to GP
Strategies Corporation Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed
with the SEC on August 19, 2003)
|
||
10.6
|
Form
of Tax Sharing Agreement between GP Strategies Corporation and the
Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant’s Form S-1, Registration No. 333-118568 filed with the SEC on
August 26, 2004)
|
||
10.7
|
Note
and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2003, among GP
Strategies Corporation, the Registrant, MXL Industries, Inc., Gabelli
Funds, LLC, as Agent, and the Purchasers listed in Schedule 1.2
thereof (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to GP
Strategies Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed with the
SEC on August 19, 2003)
|
||
10.8
|
Registration
Rights Agreement dated August 14, 2003 between the Registrant and Gabelli
Funds, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.06 to GP
Strategies’ Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed with the
SEC on August 19, 2003)
|
||
10.9
|
Mortgage,
Security Agreement and Assignment of Leases dated August 14, 2003, between
GP Strategies Corporation and Gabelli Funds, LLC (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.04 to GP Strategies Corporation Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed with the SEC on August 19,
2003)
|
||
10.10
|
Indemnity
Agreement dated August 14, 2003 by GP Strategies Corporation for the
benefit of the Registrant and MXL Industries, Inc. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.07 to GP Strategies Corporation Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed with the SEC on August 19,
2003)
|
||
10.11
|
#
|
National
Patent Development Corporation 2003 Incentive Stock Plan (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Form S-1,
Registration No. 333-118568 filed with the SEC on August 26,
2004)
|
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
||
10.12
|
#
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2001, between Charles Dawson and Five
Star Group, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to
Five Star Products, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001
filed with the SEC on April 1, 2002)
|
|
10.13
|
Loan
and Security Agreement dated as of June 20, 2003 by and between Five Star
Group, Inc. and Fleet Capital Corporation (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Five Star Products, Inc. Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed with the SEC on August 14,
2003)
|
||
10.14
|
First
Modification Agreement dated as of May 28, 2004 by and between Five Star
Group, Inc. as borrower and Fleet Capital Corporation, as Lender
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Five Star Products,
Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on
March 31, 2005)
|
||
10.15
|
Second
Modification Agreement dated as of March 22, 2005 by and between Five Star
Group, Inc. as borrower and Fleet Capital Corporation, as Lender.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Five Star Products,
Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on
March 31, 2005)
|
||
10.16
|
Third
Modification Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005 by and between Five Star
Group, Inc. as borrower and fleet Capital Corporation, as Lender.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Five Star Products,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed with the SEC on
August 12, 2005)
|
||
10.17
|
Fourth
Modification Agreement dated September 26, 2005, but effective as of
August 1, 2005, by and between Five Star Group, Inc., as borrower and
Fleet Capital Corporation, as Lender (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Five Star Products, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 filed with the SEC on November 15,
2005)
|
||
10.18
|
Fifth
Modification Agreement dated November 14, 2005 - Waiver of minimum Fixed
Charge Coverage Ratio requirement for the three months ended September 30,
2005 by and between Five Star Group, Inc. as borrower and Fleet Capital
Corporation, as Lender (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the third quarter ended September 30,
2005)
|
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
||
10.19
|
Sixth
Modification Agreement dated March 23, 2006 - Waiver of Fixed Charge
Coverage for the fiscal quarter and fiscal year ending December 31, 2005
by and between Five Star Group, Inc. as borrower and Fleet Capital
Corporation, as Lender (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14
to Five Star Products, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005
filed with the SEC on March 31, 2006)
|
||
10.20
|
Agreement
of Subordination & Assignment dated as of June 20, 2003, by JL
Distributors, Inc. in favor of Fleet Capital Corporation as Lender to Five
Star Group, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Five
Star Products, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed
with the SEC on August 14, 2003)
|
||
10.21
|
Amended
Promissory Note in the amount of $2,800,000 dated June 30, 2005, between
the Five Star Products, Inc. and National Patent Development Corporation
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Five Star Products,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed with the SEC on
August 12, 2005)
|
||
10.22
|
Agreement
dated as of January 22, 2004, between Five Star Products, Inc. and GP
Strategies Corporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99(d)
to Five Star Products, Inc. Schedule TO filed with the SEC on February 6,
2004)
|
||
10.23
|
Tax
Sharing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2004 between Five Star Products,
Inc. and GP Strategies Corporation (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.19 to Five Star Products, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 filed with the SEC on April 2, 2004)
|
||
10.24
|
Lease
dated as of February 1, 1986 between Vernel Company and Five Star Group,
Inc., as amended on July 25, 1994 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to Five Star Products, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998 filed with the SEC on March 31, 1998)
|
||
10.25
|
Lease
dated as of May 4, 1983 between Vornado, Inc., and Five Star Group, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Five Star Products,
Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 filed with the SEC on
March 31, 1998)
|
||
10.26
|
Credit
Agreement dated March 8, 2001 by and between Allfirst Bank and MXL
Industries, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the
Registrant’s Form S-1, Registration No. 333-118568 filed with the SEC on
August
26, 2004)
|
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
||
10.27
|
Mortgage,
Security Agreement, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Fixture
Filing dated June 26, 2001 by MXL Industries, Inc. to LaSalle
Bank National Association (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Form S-1, Registration No.
333-118568 filed with the SEC on August 26, 2004)
|
||
10.28
|
Credit
Agreement dated March 1, 2005 by and between M&T Bank and
MXL Industries, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on May 2,
2005)
|
||
10.29
|
Continuing
Guaranty Agreement dated March 1, 2005 by the Registrant for the benefit
of M&T Bank. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.23 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004 filed with the SEC on May 2, 2005)
|
||
10.30
|
Amended
and Restated Investor Rights Agreement dated as of May 30, 2003
by and among Hydro Med Sciences and certain Institutional
Investors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to
GP Strategies’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
filed with the SEC on April 14, 2004)
|
||
10.31
|
Amended
and Restated Investor Right of First Refusal and Co-Sale Agreement dated
as of May 30, 2003 by and among Hydro Med Sciences, Inc. and certain
Institutional Investors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.35
to the GP Strategies’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed
with the SEC on April 14, 2004)
|
||
10.32
|
Stock
Purchase Option Agreement dated as of June 30, 2004 by and among GP
Strategies Corporation, National Patent Development Corporation, Valera
Pharmaceuticals Inc. and certain Institutional Investors (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Form S-1,
Registration No. 333-118568 filed with the SEC on August 26,
2004)
|
||
10.33
|
#
|
Note
Purchase Agreement dated as of November 12, 2004 by and between the
Registrant, MXL Industries, Inc., Bedford Oak Partners L.P. and Jerome
Feldman (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the
Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the
SEC on April 15, 2005)
|
|
10.34
|
The
Registrant’s 6% Secured Note due 2009 dated as of November 12, 2004
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Registrant’s
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on April
15, 2005)
|
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
||
10.35
|
Release
and Settlement Agreement dated as of July 8, 2005 by and between AOtec,
LLC and MXL Industries, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2005 filed with the SEC on November 14, 2005)
|
||
10.36
|
#
|
Form
of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
May 15, 2006)
|
|
10.37
|
Amended
and Restated Convertible Promissory Note dated June 30, 2005 between Five
Star Products, Inc. and JL Distributors, Inc. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on March 7, 2007)
|
||
10.38
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2007, between Five Star Products,
Inc. and JL Distributors, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March
7, 2007)
|
||
10.39
|
#
|
Agreement,
dated as of March 2, 2007, between Five Star Products, Inc. and Leslie
Flegel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 7,
2007)
|
|
10.40
|
#
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2007, between Five Star Products,
Inc. and Leslie Flegel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 7,
2007)
|
|
10.41
|
#
|
Purchase
Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2007, between National Patent Development
Corporation and Leslie Flegel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5
to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March
7, 2007)
|
|
10.42
|
#
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2007, between National Patent
Development Corporation. and Leslie Flegel (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on March 7, 2007)
|
|
10.43
|
#
|
Restricted
Stock Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2007, between Five Star Products,
Inc. and John Belknap (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 7,
2007)
|
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
||
10.44
|
#
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2007, between Five Star Products,
Inc. and John Belknap (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 7,
2007)
|
|
10.45
|
#
|
Non-Qualified
Stock Option Agreement, dated March 1, 2007, between the Registrant and
Harvey P. Eisen (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the SEC on March 7,
2007)
|
|
10.46
|
#
|
Stock
Option Agreement, dated March 1, 2007, between National Patent Development
Corporation and John Belknap (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10
to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March
7, 2007)
|
|
10.47
|
#
|
Stock
Option Agreement, dated March 1, 2007, between National Patent Development
Corporation and Talton Embry (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11
to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March
7, 2007)
|
|
10.48
|
#
|
Stock
Option Agreement, dated March 1, 2007, between National Patent Development
Corporation and Scott Greenberg (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.12 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
March 7, 2007)
|
|
10.49
|
#
|
Stock
Option Agreement, dated March 1, 2007, between National Patent Development
Corporation and Lawrence Schafran (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.13 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
March 7, 2007)
|
|
10.50
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement dated as of March 13, 2007 between Five Star Products,
Inc. and Right-Way Dealer Warehouse, Inc. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on March 19, 2007)
|
||
10.51
|
Agreement
of Lease, dated as of April 5, 2007, between Kampner Realty, LLC, as
Landlord, and Five Star Products, Inc., as Tenant, for premises located at
1202 Metropolitan Avenue, Brooklyn, NY (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on April 11, 2007)
|
||
10.52
|
#
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of April 5, 2007, between Five Star Group, Inc. and
Ronald Kampner (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 11,
2007)
|
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
||
10.53
|
Amendment
to Agreement of Lease between Kampner Realty, LLC, as Landlord, and Five
Star Products, Inc., as Tenant, for premises located at 1202 Metropolitan
Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, agreed upon and entered into on June 11, 2007
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC on June 14,
2007)
|
||
10.54
|
#
|
Stock
Option Agreement dated as of July 30, 2007 between the Company and Ira J.
Sobotko (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 filed with
the SEC on November 14, 2007)
|
|
10.55
|
#
|
Stock
Option Agreement dated as of July 17, 2007 between Five Star Products,
Inc. and Ira J. Sobotko (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007
filed with the SEC on November 14, 2007)
|
|
10.56
|
#
|
National
Patent Development Corporation 2003 Incentive Stock Plan, as amended
(incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Registrant’s Proxy
Statement filed by the Registrant with the SEC on November 16,
2007)
|
|
10.57
|
#
|
National
Patent Development Corporation 2007 Incentive Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Appendix B to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement filed by the
Registrant with the SEC on November 16, 2007)
|
|
10.58
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2008, by and among National
Patent Development Corporation, MXL Industries, Inc., MXL Operations,
Inc., MXL Leasing, LP and MXL Realty, LP (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Five Star Products,
Inc. filed with the SEC on June 19, 2008).
|
||
10.59
|
Stockholders
Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2008, by and among MXL Operations, Inc.,
MXL Industries, Inc. and the other stockholders of MXL Operations, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC on June 19,
2008).
|
||
10.60
|
Limited
Partnership Agreement of MXL Leasing, LP, dated as of June 16, 2008, by
and between MXL GP, LLC and the limited partners of MXL Leasing, LP
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC on June 19,
2008).
|
||
10.61
|
Limited
Partnership Agreement of MXL Realty, LP, dated as of June 16, 2008, by and
between MXL GP, LLC and the limited partners of MXL Realty, LP
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC on June 19,
2008).
|
10.62
|
Put
and Call Option Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2008, by and between MXL
Operations, Inc., MXL Leasing, LP, MXL Realty, LP and MXL Industries, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC on June 19,
2008).
|
||
10.63
|
Tender
Offer and Merger Agreement, dated June 26, 2008, among the Company, NPDV
Acquisition Corp. and Five Star Products, Inc. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Five Star
Products, Inc. filed with the SEC on June 26, 2008).
|
||
10.64
|
#
|
Letter
Agreement, dated June 26, 2008 among Bruce Sherman, Company and Five Star
Products, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC
on June 26, 2008).
|
|
10.65
|
#
|
Letter
Agreement, dated June 26, 2008 among Ronald Kampner, Company and Five Star
Products, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC
on June 26, 2008).
|
|
10.66
|
#
|
Letter
Agreement, dated June 26, 2008 among Charles Dawson, Company and Five Star
Products, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC
on June 26, 2008).
|
|
10.67
|
#
|
Letter
Agreement, dated June 26, 2008 among Joseph Leven, Company and Five Star
Products, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC
on June 26, 2008).
|
|
10.68
|
#
|
Letter
Agreement, dated June 26, 2008 among Ira Sobotko, Company and Five Star
Products, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC
on June 26, 2008).
|
|
10.69
|
#
|
Letter
Agreement, dated June 26, 2008 among Mr. John C. Belknap, Company and Five
Star Products, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Current Report on Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the
SEC on June 26, 2008).
|
|
10.
70
|
Letter
Agreement amending certain warrant certificates, dated as of August 11,
2008, by and among National Patent Development Corporation, The Gabelli
Small Cap Growth Fund, The Gabelli Equity Income Fund, The Gabelli ABC
Fund, and The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC on August 12,
2008)
|
||
10.71
|
National
Patent Development Corporation Warrant Certificate, dated as of December
3, 2004, issuing 379,703 warrants to The Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC on August 12,
2008).
|
10.72
|
National
Patent Development Corporation Warrant Certificate, dated as of December
3, 2004, issuing 379,703 warrants to The Gabelli Convertible Securities
and Income Fund Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Current Report on Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the
SEC on August 12, 2008)
|
||
10.73
|
National
Patent Development Corporation Warrant Certificate, dated as of December
3, 2004, issuing 379,703 warrants to The Gabelli Equity Income Fund
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K of Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC on August 12,
2008).
|
||
10.74
|
National
Patent Development Corporation Warrant Certificate, dated as of December
3, 2004, issuing 284,777 warrants to The Gabelli ABC Fund (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of
Five Star Products, Inc. filed with the SEC on August 12,
2008).
|
||
14
|
Code
of Ethics Policy (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the
Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the
SEC on April 15, 2005)
|
||
21
|
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the
Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the
SEC on April 3, 2007) [NOTE: Determine whether this changed since the one
filed in April 2007.]
|
||
23
|
*
|
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
31.1
|
*
|
Certification
of the principal executive officer of the Registrant, pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)
|
|
31.2
|
*
|
Certification
of the principal financial officer of the Registrant, pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)
|
|
32
|
*
|
Certifications
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by the principal executive officer
and the principal financial officer of the
Registrant
|
___________________________
* Filed
herewith.
# Management
contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.