WVS FINANCIAL CORP - Quarter Report: 2013 September (Form 10-Q)

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 0-22444

WVS Financial Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Pennsylvania				25-1710500
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)				(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

9001 Perry Highway Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania				15237
(Address of principal executive offices)				(Zip Code)

(412) 364-1911

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days.

YES X NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES X NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer		Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12 b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES NO X

Shares outstanding as of November 14, 2013: 2,057,930 shares Common Stock, $.01 par value.

WVS FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

INDEX


PART I.	Financial Information	Page

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013 (Unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Statement of Income for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)	4

	Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)	5

	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 (Unaudited)	6

	Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)	7

	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	9

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013	33

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	39

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	47

PART II.	Other Information	Page

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	48
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	48
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	48
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	48
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	48
Item 5.	Other Information	48
Item 6.	Exhibits	48
	Signatures	49

WVS FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)


	September 30, 2013				June 30, 2013
Assets
Cash and due from banks		$	1,570			$	1,603
Interest-earning demand deposits			897				324

Total cash and cash equivalents			2,467				1,927
Certificates of deposit			598				598
Investment securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $63,578 and $77,067)			63,716				77,186
Investment securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $22,515 and $26,956)			22,172				26,420
Mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $160,983 and $139,998)			160,532				139,268
Net loans receivable (allowance for loan losses of $319 and $307)			34,296				31,531
Accrued interest receivable			1,464				1,371
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost			5,211				5,682
Premises and equipment, net			620				614
Bank owned life insurance			4,026				2,000
Deferred tax assets (net)			696				748
Other assets			160				231

TOTAL ASSETS		$	295,958			$	287,576


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits
Non-interest-bearing accounts		$	17,940			$	14,911
NOW accounts			20,930				20,654
Savings accounts			41,808				41,808
Money market accounts			24,431				23,772
Certificates of deposit			38,092				38,829
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance			251				550

Total deposits			143,452				140,524
Federal Home Loan Bank advances: long-term			17,500				17,500
Federal Home Loan Bank advances: short-term			102,070				96,712
Accrued interest payable			212				210
Other liabilities			655				802

TOTAL LIABILITIES			263,889				255,748


Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock:
5,000,000 shares, no par value per share, authorized; none Issued			-				-
Common stock:
10,000,000 shares, $.01 par value per share, authorized; 3,805,636 and 3,805,636 shares issued			38				38
Additional paid-in capital			21,483				21,478
Treasury stock: 1,747,706 and 1,747,706 shares at cost, respectively			(26,690	)			(26,690	)
Retained earnings, substantially restricted			37,872				37,744
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(634	)			(742	)

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY			32,069				31,828

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	295,958			$	287,576

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

WVS FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans, including fees		$ 414		$ 586
Investment securities – taxable		498		780
Mortgage-backed securities		474		247
Certificates of deposit		3		2
FHLB Stock		13		2

Total interest and dividend income		1,402		1,617


INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits		79		108
Federal Home Loan Bank advances – long-term		211		211
Federal Home Loan Bank advances – short-term		54		53

Total interest expense		344		372


NET INTEREST INCOME		1,058		1,245
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		12		(24)

NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		1,046		1,269


NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Service charges on deposits		52		51
Earnings on Bank Owned Life Insurance		26		-
Investment securities gains		-		8
Other		59		71

Total non-interest income		137		130


NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits		511		493
Occupancy and equipment		73		75
Data processing		60		61
Correspondent bank service charges		11		14
Federal deposit insurance premium		47		36
Other		157		254

Total non-interest expense		859		933


INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		324		466
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		114		81

NET INCOME		$ 210		$ 385


EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Basic		$ 0.10		$ 0.19
Diluted		$ 0.10		$ 0.19

AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic		2,057,930		2,057,930
Diluted		2,057,930		2,057,930

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

WVS FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013		2012

NET INCOME	$	210	$	385

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:

Investment securities available for sale not other-than-temporarily impaired:
Gains arising during the year		19		356
Income tax effect		(6)		(121)

		13		235

Gains recognized in earnings		-		8
Income tax effect		-		(3)

		-		5

Unrealized holdings gains on securities available for sale not other-than-temporarily impaired, net of tax		13		240


Investment securities held to maturity other-than-temporarily impaired:
Accretion of other comprehensive loss on other-than-temporarily impaired securities held to maturity		145		221
Income tax effect		(50)		(75)

		95		146

Unrealized holding gains on other-than-temporarily impaired securities held to maturity, net of tax		95		146


Unrealized holding gains on securities, net		108		386


Other comprehensive income		108		386


NET COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	318	$	771

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

WVS FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except per share data)


	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Treasury Stock		Retained Earnings Substantially Restricted		Accumulated Other Compre- hensive Income (Loss)		Total
Balance at June 30, 2013	$	38		$21,478	$	(26,690)		$37,744		$ (742)	$	31,828

Net Income								210				210

Other comprehensive income										108		108

Expense of stock options awarded				5								5

Cash dividends declared ($0.04 per share)								(82)				(82)


Balance at September 30, 2013	$	38		$21,483	$	(26,690)		$37,872		$ (634)	$	32,069

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

WVS FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net income	$	210	$	385
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		12		(24)
Depreciation		21		23
Gain on sale of investments		-		(8)
Amortization of discounts, premiums and deferred loan fees		570		668
Deferred income taxes		52		208
Increase in prepaid accrued income taxes		3		6
Earnings on bank owned life insurance		(26)		-
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(93)		(255)
Increase in accrued interest payable		2		1
Decrease in deferred director compensation payable		(8)		(8)
Decrease in prepaid federal deposit insurance premium		-		32
Other, net		(121)		(297)

Net cash provided by operating activities		622		731


INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Available-for-sale:
Purchase of investment securities		-		(31,511)
Proceeds from repayments of investments		12,936		2,803
Proceeds from sales of investments		-		1,891
Held-to-maturity:
Purchases of investment securities		(1,955)		-
Purchases of mortgage-backed securities		(29,158)		(23,529)
Proceeds from repayments of investments		6,182		4,511
Proceeds from repayments of mortgage-backed securities		8,043		18,145
Purchase of bank owned life insurance		(2,000)		-
Net (increase) decrease in net loans receivable		(2,778)		752
Redemption of FHLB stock		471		727
Capital improvements to other real estate owned		-		(4)
Acquisition of premises and equipment		(27)		(48)

Net cash used for investing activities		(8,286)		(26,263)

WVS FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012
FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Net increase in transaction and savings accounts	$	3,964	$	738
Net decrease in certificates of deposit		(737)		(1,066)
Net decrease in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		(299)		(369)
Net increase in CDARS one-way buy CDs		-		198
Net increase in FHLB short-term advances		5,358		26,168
Cash dividends paid		(82)		(81)

Net cash provided by financing activities		8,204		25,588


Increase in cash and cash equivalents		540		56

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD		1,927		2,506


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF THE PERIOD	$	2,467	$	2,562


SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Cash paid during the period for:
Interest on deposits, escrows and borrowings	$	342	$	371
Income taxes	$	115	$	141

Non-cash items:
Educational Improvement Tax Credit	$	9	$	86

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

WVS FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.	BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. However, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013, are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire fiscal year.

2.	RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04, Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date. The ASU requires the measurement of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement with its co-obligors as well as any additional amount that the entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The new standard is effective retrospectively for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, and early adoption is permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board FASB issued ASU 2013-07, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting. The amendments in this Update are being issued to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting. In addition, the guidance provides principles for the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities and requirements for financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting. The amendments require an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent. Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces (for example, involuntary bankruptcy). If a plan for liquidation was specified in the entity’s governing documents from the entity’s inception (for example, limited-life entities), the entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if the approved plan for liquidation differs from the plan for liquidation that was specified at the entity’s inception. The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted. Entities that use the liquidation basis of accounting as of the effective date in accordance with other Topics (for example, terminating employee benefit plans) are not required to apply the amendments. Instead, those entities should continue to apply the guidance in those other Topics until they have completed liquidation. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. This Update applies to all entities that have unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date. An unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar

tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The assessment of whether a deferred tax asset is available is based on the unrecognized tax benefit and deferred tax asset that exist at the reporting date and should be made presuming disallowance of the tax position at the reporting date. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

3.	EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of the weighted-average common shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share.


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012

Weighted average common shares issued		3,805,636		3,805,636
Average treasury stock shares		(1,747,706)		(1,747,706)


Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate basic earnings per share		2,057,930		2,057,930
Additional common stock equivalents (stock options) used to calculate diluted earnings per share		-		-


Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate diluted earnings per share		2,057,930		2,057,930

There are no convertible securities that would affect the numerator in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share; therefore, net income as presented on the Consolidated Statement of Income is used.

At September 30, 2013, there were 114,519 options outstanding with an exercise price of $16.20 which were anti-dilutive for the three month period. At September 30, 2012 there were 124,519 options outstanding with an exercise price of $16.20 which were anti-dilutive for the three month period.

4.	STOCK BASED COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE

The Company’s 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which was approved by shareholders in October 2008, permits the grant of stock options or restricted shares to its directors and employees for up to 152,000 shares (up to 38,000 restricted shares may be issued). Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant; those option awards generally vest over five years of continuous service and have ten-year contractual terms.

During the three month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded $5 thousand and $6 thousand, respectively, in compensation expense related to our share-based compensation awards. As of September 30, 2013, there was approximately $2 thousand of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation awards granted in fiscal 2009. That cost is expected to be recognized over the next four months.

For purposes of computing results, the Company estimated the fair values of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The model requires the use of subjective assumptions that can materially affect fair value estimates. The fair value of each option is amortized into compensation expense on a straight line basis between the grant date for the option and each vesting date. The fair value of each stock option granted was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions:


Assumptions
Volatility	7.49	%	to	11.63	%
Interest Rates	2.59	%	to	3.89	%
Dividend Yields	3.94	%	to	4.02	%
Weighted Average Life (in years)	10

The Company had 19,729 non-vested stock options outstanding at September 30, 2013, and 43,552 unvested stock options outstanding at September 30, 2012. There were no stock options exercised or issued during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

5.	INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair values of investments are as follows:


		Amortized Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
September 30, 2013	(Dollars in Thousands)

AVAILABLE FOR SALE
Corporate debt securities	$		60,444	$		204	$		(77)	$		60,571
Foreign debt securities ¹			3,134			12			(1)			3,145


Total	$		63,578	$		216	$		(78)	$		63,716


		Amortized Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
September 30, 2013	(Dollars in Thousands)

HELD TO MATURITY
U.S. government agency securities	$		11,954	$		4	$		(344)	$		11,614
Corporate debt securities			10,218			683			-			10,901


Total	$		22,172	$		687	$		(344)	$		22,515

¹	U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds of large foreign issuers.


		Amortized Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
June 30, 2013		(Dollars in Thousands)

AVAILABLE FOR SALE
Corporate debt securities	$		73,349	$		223	$		(107)	$		73,465
Foreign debt securities ¹			3,718			8			(5)			3,721


Total	$		77,067	$		231	$		(112)	$		77,186


		Amortized Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
June 30, 2013		(Dollars in Thousands)

HELD TO MATURITY
U.S. government agency securities	$		9,995	$		-	$		(328)	$		9,667
Corporate debt securities			14,425			853			-			15,278
Foreign debt securities ¹			2,000			11			-			2,011


Total	$		26,420	$		864	$		(328)	$		26,956

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, and 2012, the Company recorded gross realized investment security gains of $0 thousand, and $8 thousand, respectively. Proceeds from sales of investment securities during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, were $0 and $1.9 million, respectively.

The amortized cost and fair values of debt securities at September 30, 2013, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from the contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call securities prior to their final maturities.


		Due in one year or less			Due after one through two years			Due after two through three years			Due after three through five years			Due after five through ten years			Due after ten years			Total
		(Dollars in Thousands)
AVAILABLE FOR SALE
Amortized cost	$		35,846	$		13,908	$		11,829	$		1,004	$		991	$		-	$		63,578
Fair value			35,929			14,015			11,813			983			976			-			63,716

HELD TO MATURITY
Amortized cost	$		5,012	$		999	$		522	$		2,551	$		1,133	$		11,955	$		22,172
Fair value			5,072			1,075			594			2,834			1,326			11,614			22,515

At both September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, no investment securities were pledged to secure public deposits, repurchase agreements, or borrowings with the Federal Home Loan Bank. Excess collateral is maintained to support future borrowings and may be withdrawn by the Company at any time.

¹	U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds of large foreign issuers.

6.	MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES

Mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) include mortgage pass-through certificates (“PCs”) and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”). With a pass-through security, investors own an undivided interest in the pool of mortgages that collateralize the PCs. Principal and interest is passed through to the investor as it is generated by the mortgages underlying the pool. PCs and CMOs may be insured or guaranteed by Freddie Mac (“FHLMC”), Fannie Mae (“FNMA”) and the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”). CMOs may also be privately issued with varying degrees of credit enhancements. A CMO reallocates mortgage pool cash flow to a series of bonds (called traunches) with varying stated maturities, estimated average lives, coupon rates and prepayment characteristics.

The Company’s CMO portfolio is comprised of two segments: CMO’s backed by U.S. Government Agencies (“Agency CMO’s”) and CMO’s backed by single-family whole loans not guaranteed by a U.S. Government Agency (“Private-Label CMO’s”).

At September 30, 2013, the Company’s Agency CMO’s totaled $157.4 million as compared to $135.6 million at June 30, 2013. The Company’s private-label CMO’s totaled $3.1 million at September 30, 2013 as compared to $3.6 million at June 30, 2013. The $21.3 million increase in the CMO segment of our MBS portfolio was primarily due to purchases of U.S. Government Agency CMO’s totaling $29.2 million which more than offset repayments on our Agency CMO’s totaling $7.5 million and $688 thousand in repayments on our private-label CMO’s. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company received principal payments totaling $688 thousand on its private-label CMO’s. At September 30, 2013, approximately $160.5 million or 100.0% (book value) of the Company’s MBS portfolio, including CMO’s, were comprised of adjustable or floating rate investments, as compared to $139.3 million or 100.0% at June 30, 2013. Substantially all of the Company’s floating rate MBS adjust monthly based upon changes in the one month LIBOR. The Company has no investment in multi-family or commercial real estate based MBS.

Due to prepayments of the underlying loans, and the prepayment characteristics of the CMO traunches, the actual maturities of the Company’s MBS are expected to be substantially less than the scheduled maturities.

The Company retains an independent third party to assist it in the determination of a fair value for its three private-label CMO’s. This valuation is meant to be a “Level Three” valuation as defined by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The valuation does not represent the actual terms or prices at which any party could purchase the securities. There is currently no active secondary market for private-label CMO’s and there can be no assurance that any secondary market for private-label CMO’s will develop. The private-label CMO portfolio had three previously recorded other-than-temporary impairments at September 30, 2013. During the three months ending September 30, 2013, the Company reversed $145 thousand of non-credit unrealized holding losses on its three private-label CMO’s with OTTI due to principal repayments. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded no additional credit impairment charges on its private-label CMO portfolio.

The Company believes that the data and assumptions used to determine the fair values are reasonable. The fair value calculations reflect relevant facts and market conditions. Events and conditions occurring after the valuation date could have a material effect on the private-label CMO segment’s fair value.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s private-label CMO portfolio as of September 30, 2013. At the time of purchase, all of our private-label CMO’s were rated in the highest investment category by at least two ratings agencies.


		At September 30, 2013
		Rating			Book Value		Fair Value²		Life to Date Impairment Recorded in Earnings
Cusip #	Security Description	S&P	Moody’s	Fitch	(in thousands)
126694CP1	CWHL SER 21 A11	N/A	Caa2	C	$	1,805	$	2,199	$	201
126694KF4	CWHL SER 24 A15	D	N/A	D		312		348		33
126694KF4	CWHL SER 24 A15	D	N/A	D		622		697		66
126694MP0	CWHL SER 26 1A5	CC	N/A	C		365		381		36

					$	3,104	$	3,625	$	336

The amortized cost and fair values of mortgage-backed securities are as follows:


					Gross			Gross
		Amortized			Unrealized			Unrealized			Fair
		Cost			Gains			Losses			Value

		(Dollars in Thousands)
September 30, 2013
HELD TO MATURITY

Collateralized mortgage obligations:
Agency	$		157,428	$		1,053	$		(1,123)	$		157,358
Private-label			3,104			521			-			3,625


Total	$		160,532	$		1,574	$		(1,123)	$		160,983


					Gross			Gross
		Amortized			Unrealized			Unrealized			Fair
		Cost			Gains			Losses			Value

June 30, 2013			(Dollars in Thousands)
HELD TO MATURITY

Collateralized mortgage obligations:
Agency	$		135,621	$		368	$		(256)	$		135,733
Private-label			3,647			621			(3)			4,265


Total	$		139,268	$		989	$		(259)	$		139,998

² Fair value estimate provided by the Company’s independent third party valuation consultant.

The amortized cost and fair value of mortgage-backed securities at September 30, 2013, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from the contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


		Due in one year or less			Due after one through five years			Due after five through ten years			Due after ten years			Total
	(Dollars in Thousands)

HELD TO MATURITY
Amortized cost	$		-	$		-	$		308	$		160,224	$		160,532
Fair value	$		-	$		-	$		314	$		160,669	$		160,983

At September 30, 2013 mortgage-backed securities with amortized costs of $134.1 million and fair values of $133.7 million were pledged to secure borrowings with the Federal Home Loan Bank. Of the securities pledged, $25.6 million of fair value was excess collateral. At June 30, 2013 mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of $123.7 million and fair values of $123.8 million, were pledged to secured borrowings with the Federal Home Loan Bank. Of the securities pledged, $20.9 million of fair value was excess collateral. Excess collateral is maintained to support future borrowings and may be withdrawn by the Company at any time.

7.	ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following tables present the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income by component, for the three months ended September 30, 2013.


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
	(Dollars in Thousands – net of tax)

	Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available-for-sale Securities		Unrealized Gains and Losses on Held-to-maturity Securities		Total

Beginning Balance – June 30, 2013	$	78	$	(820)	$	(742)

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		13		95		108
Net current-period other comprehensive income		13		95		108


Ending Balance – September 30, 2013	$	91	$	(725)	$	(634)

8.	UNREALIZED LOSSES ON SECURITIES

The following table shows the Company’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013.


	September 30, 2013
	Less Than Six Months						Six through Twelve Months						Twelve Months or Greater						Total
		Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses
	(Dollars in Thousands)

U.S. government agencies securities	$		9,654	$		(344)	$		-	$		-	$		-	$		-	$		9,654	$		(344)
Corporate debt securities			4,537			(6)			5,341			(71)			-			-			9,878			(77)
Foreign debt securities¹			-			-			520			(1)			-			-			520			(1)
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
Agency			66,174			(794)			23,945			(286)			3,945			(43)			94,064			(1,123)


Total	$		80,365	$		(1,144)	$		29,806	$		(358)	$		3,945	$		(43)	$		114,116	$		(1,545)


	June 30, 2013
	Less Than Six Months						Six through Twelve Months						Twelve Months or Greater						Total
		Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses
	(Dollars in Thousands)

U.S. government agencies securities	$		9,667	$		(328)	$		-	$		-	$		-	$		-	$		9,667	$		(328)
Corporate debt securities			15,042			(78)			2,322			(29)			-			-			17,364			(107)
Foreign debt securities¹			-			-			518			(5)			-			-			518			(5)
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
Agency			49,176			(235)			782			(13)			4,900			(8)			54,858			(256)
Private-label			-			-			-			-			109			(3)			109			(3)


Total	$		73,885	$		(641)	$		3,622	$		(47)	$		5,009	$		(11)	$		82,516	$		(699)

¹	U.S. dollar-dominated investment-grade corporate bonds of large foreign issuers.

For debt securities, impairment is considered to be other than temporary if an entity (1) intends to sell the security, (2) more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovering its amortized cost basis, or (3) does not expect to recover the security’s entire amortized cost basis (even if the entity does not intend to sell the security). In addition, impairment is considered to be other than temporary if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security is less than the amortized cost basis of the security (any such shortfall is referred to as a credit loss).

The Company evaluates outstanding available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities in an unrealized loss position (i.e., impaired securities) for OTTI on a quarterly basis. In doing so, the Company considers many factors including, but not limited to: the credit ratings assigned to the securities by the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs); other indicators of the credit quality of the issuer; the strength of the provider of any guarantees; the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than amortized cost; and whether the Company has the intent to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. In the case of its private label residential MBS, the Company also considers prepayment speeds, the historical and projected performance of the underlying loans and the credit support provided by the subordinate securities. These evaluations are inherently subjective and consider a number of quantitative and qualitative factors.

The following table presents a roll-forward of the credit loss component of the amortized cost of mortgage-backed securities that we have written down for OTTI and the credit component of the loss that is recognized in earnings. OTTI recognized in earnings for credit impaired mortgage-backed securities is presented as additions in two components based upon whether the current period is the first time the mortgage-backed security was credit-impaired (initial credit impairment) or is not the first time the mortgage-backed security was credit impaired (subsequent credit impairments). The credit loss component is reduced if we sell, intend to sell or believe that we will be required to sell previously credit-impaired mortgage-backed securities. Additionally, the credit loss component is reduced if we receive cash flows in excess of what we expected to receive over the remaining life of the credit impaired mortgage-backed securities, the security matures or is fully written down.


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013		2012
	(Dollars in Thousands)

Beginning balance		$ 316		$ 324
Initial credit impairment		-		-
Subsequent credit impairment		-		-
Reductions for amounts recognized in earnings due to intent or requirement to sell		-		-
Reductions for securities sold		-		-
Reduction for actual realized losses		(7)		-
Reduction for increase in cash flows expected to be collected		-		-

Ending Balance		$ 309		$ 324

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded no credit impairment charge, and no non-credit unrealized holding loss to accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company accreted back into other comprehensive income $95 thousand (net of income tax effect of $50 thousand), based on principal repayments on private-label CMO’s previously identified with OTTI.

In the case of its private-label residential CMO’s that exhibit adverse risk characteristics, the Company employs models to determine the cash flows that it is likely to collect from the securities. These models consider borrower characteristics and the particular attributes of the loans underlying the securities, in conjunction with assumptions about future changes in home prices and interest rates, to predict the likelihood a loan will default and the impact on default frequency, loss severity and remaining credit enhancement. A significant input to these models is the forecast of future housing price changes for the relevant states and metropolitan statistical areas, which are based upon an assessment of the various housing markets. In general, since the ultimate receipt of contractual payments on these securities will depend upon the credit and prepayment performance of the underlying loans and, if needed, the credit enhancements for the senior securities owned by the Company, the Company uses these models to assess whether the credit enhancement associated with each security is sufficient to protect against likely losses of principal and interest on the underlying mortgage loans. The development of the modeling assumptions requires significant judgment.

In conjunction with our adoption of ASC Topic 820 effective June 30, 2009, the Company retained an independent third party to assist it with assessing its investments within the private-label CMO portfolio. The independent third party utilized certain assumptions for producing the cash flow analyses used in the OTTI assessment. Key assumptions would include interest rates, expected market participant spreads and discount rates, housing prices, projected future delinquency levels and assumed loss rates on any liquidated collateral.

The Company reviewed the independent third party’s assumptions used in the September 30, 2013 OTTI process. Based on the results of this review, the Company deemed the independent third

party’s assumptions to be reasonable and adopted them. However, different assumptions could produce materially different results, which could impact the Company’s conclusions as to whether an impairment is considered other-than-temporary and the magnitude of the credit loss. Management believes that no additional private-label CMO’s in the portfolio had an other-than-temporary impairment at September 30, 2013, keeping the total at three private-label CMO’s with OTTI at September 30, 2013.

If the Company intends to sell an impaired debt security, or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, the impairment is other-than-temporary and is recognized currently in earnings in an amount equal to the entire difference between fair value and amortized cost. The Company does not anticipate selling its private-label CMO portfolio, nor does Management believe that the Company will be required to sell these securities before recovery of this amortized cost basis.

In instances in which the Company determines that a credit loss exists but the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis, the OTTI is separated into (1) the amount of the total impairment related to the credit loss and (2) the amount of the total impairment related to all other factors (i.e., the noncredit portion). The amount of the total OTTI related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings and the amount of the total OTTI related to all other factors is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The total OTTI is presented in the Consolidated Statement of Income with an offset for the amount of the total OTTI that is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Absent the intent or requirement to sell a security, if a credit loss does not exist, any impairment is considered to be temporary.

Regardless of whether an OTTI is recognized in its entirety in earnings or if the credit portion is recognized in earnings and the noncredit portion is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), the estimation of fair values has a significant impact on the amount(s) of any impairment that is recorded.

The noncredit portion of any OTTI losses on securities classified as available-for-sale is adjusted to fair value with an offsetting adjustment to the carrying value of the security. The fair value adjustment could increase or decrease the carrying value of the security. All of the Company’s private-label CMOs were originally, and continue to be classified, as held to maturity.

In periods subsequent to the recognition of an OTTI loss, the other-than-temporarily impaired debt security is accounted for as if it had been purchased on the measurement date of the OTTI at an amount equal to the previous amortized cost basis less the credit-related OTTI recognized in earnings. For debt securities for which credit-related OTTI is recognized in earnings, the difference between the new cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected is accreted into interest income over the remaining life of the security in a prospective manner based on the amount and timing of future estimated cash flows.

The Company had investments in 32 positions that were impaired at September 30, 2013. Based on its analysis, management has concluded that three private-label CMO’s are other-than-temporarily impaired, while the remaining securities portfolio has experienced unrealized losses and a decrease in fair value due to interest rate volatility, illiquidity in the marketplace, or credit deterioration in the U.S. mortgage markets.

9.	LOANS AND RELATED ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The following table summarizes the primary segments of the loan portfolio as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013.


		September 30, 2013								June 30, 2013
		Total Loans			Individually evaluated for impairment			Collectively evaluated for impairment			Total Loans			Individually evaluated for impairment			Collectively evaluated for impairment

		(Dollars in Thousands)
First mortgage loans:
1 – 4 family dwellings	$		16,238	$		-	$		16,238	$		13,611	$		-	$		13,611
Construction			3,792			701			3,091			2,546			701			1,845
Land acquisition & development			1,084			-			1,084			1,407			280			1,127
Multi-family dwellings			2,703			-			2,703			2,780			-			2,780
Commercial			5,174			-			5,174			5,787			-			5,787

Consumer Loans
Home equity			987			-			987			1,085			-			1,085
Home equity lines of credit			2,068			150			1,918			2,056			150			1,906
Other			243			-			243			180			-			180

Commercial Loans			1,849			-			1,849			1,890			-			1,890

Obligations (other than securities and leases) of states and political subdivisons			500			-			500			500			-			500

	$		34,638	$		851	$		33,787	$		31,842	$		1,131	$		30,711

Less: Deferred loan fees			(23)									(4)
Allowance for loan losses			(319)									(307)

Total	$		34,296							$		31,531

Impaired loans are loans for which it is probable the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The following loan categories are collectively evaluated for impairment. First mortgage loans: 1 – 4 family dwellings and all consumer loan categories (home equity, home equity lines of credit, and other). The following loan categories are individually evaluated for impairment. First mortgage loans: construction, land acquisition and development, multi-family dwellings, and commercial. The Company evaluates commercial loans not secured by real property individually for impairment.

The definition of “impaired loans” is not the same as the definition of “nonaccrual loans,” although the two categories overlap. The Company may choose to place a loan on nonaccrual status due to payment delinquency or uncertain collectability, while not classifying the loan as impaired if the loan is not a commercial or commercial real estate loan. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status and collateral value. The amount of impairment for these types of impaired loans is determined by the difference between the present value of the expected cash flows related to the loan, using the original interest rate, and its recorded value, or as a practical expedient in the case of collateralized loans, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the recorded amount of the loans. When foreclosure is probable, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral.

Loans that experience insignificant payment delays, which are defined as 90 days or less, generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration all circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

The following tables summarize of the loans considered to be impaired as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, and the related interest income recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012:


		September 30,			June 30,
		2013			2013
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Impaired loans with an allocated allowance:
Construction loans	$		701	$		701
Impaired loans without an allocated allowance:
Construction loans			-			-
Land acquisition & development loans			-			280
Home equity lines of credit			150			150

Total impaired loans	$		851	$		1,131

Allocated allowance on impaired loans:
Construction loans	$		109	$		107

		Three Months Ended
		September 30, 2013			September 30, 2012
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Average impaired loans:
Construction loans	$		701	$		701
Land acquisition & development loans			57			-
Home equity lines of credit			150			150

Total	$		908	$		851


Income recognized on impaired loans:
Construction loans	$		-	$		-
Land acquisition & development loans			-			-
Home equity lines of credit			1			2

Total	$		1	$		2

Total nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013 and the related interest income recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 are as follows:


		September 30,			June 30,
		2013			2013
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Principal outstanding
1 – 4 family dwellings	$		476	$		477
Construction			701			701
Land acquisition & development			-			280
Home equity lines of credit			150			150

Total	$		1,327	$		1,608



		Three Months Ended
		September 30, 2013			September 30, 2012

		(Dollars in Thousands)
Average nonaccrual loans
1 – 4 family dwellings	$		477	$		282
Construction			701			1,051
Land acquisition & development			57			290
Home equity lines of credit			150			150

Total	$		1,385	$		1,773


Income that would have been recognized	$		22	$		27
Interest income recognized			2			41


Interest income foregone	$		20	$		18

The Company’s loan portfolio also includes troubled debt restructurings (TDR’s), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced or are expected to experience financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from the Company’s loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions. Certain TDR’s are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructure and may only be returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally six months.

The following tables include the recorded investment and number of modifications for modified loans, as of September 30, 2013 and 2012. The Company reports the recorded investment in the loans prior to a modification and also the recorded investment in the loans after the loans were restructured.


	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment

	(Dollars in Thousands)
Troubled debt restructurings:
Home equity lines of credit	-	$	-	$	-

Troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted:
Home equity lines of credit	1	$	150	$	150


	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012

	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment

	(Dollars in Thousands)
Troubled debt restructurings:
Home equity lines of credit	-	$	-	$	-

Troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted:
Home equity lines of credit	-	$	-	$	-

There is one previously modified TDR in default as of September 30, 2013.

When the Company modifies a loan, management evaluates any possible impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan agreement, except when the sole (remaining) source of repayment for the loan is the operation or liquidation of the collateral. In these cases, management uses the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs, instead of discounted cash flows. If management determines that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized by segment or class of loan, as applicable, through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance. Segment and class status is determined by the loan’s classification at origination.

The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged against income. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance account. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb estimated potential loan losses. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio considering past experience, current economic conditions, composition of the loan portfolio and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change.

Effective December 13, 2006, the FDIC, in conjunction with the other federal banking agencies adopted a Revised Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (“ALLL”). The revised policy statement revised and replaced the banking agencies’ 1993 policy statement on the ALLL. The revised policy statement provides that an institution must maintain an ALLL at a level that is appropriate to cover estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans determined to be impaired, as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio. The banking agencies also revised the policy to ensure consistency with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The revised policy statement updates the previous guidance that describes the responsibilities of the board of directors, management, and bank examiners regarding the ALLL, factors to be considered in the estimation of the ALLL, and the objectives and elements of an effective loan review system.

Federal regulations require that each insured savings institution classify its assets on a regular basis. In addition, in connection with examinations of insured institutions, federal examiners have authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, classify them. There are three classifications for problem assets: “substandard”, “doubtful” and “loss”. Substandard assets have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the insured institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Doubtful assets have the weaknesses of those classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified as loss is

considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted. Another category designated “asset watch” is also utilized by the Bank for assets which do not currently expose an insured institution to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification as substandard, doubtful or loss. Assets classified as substandard or doubtful require the institution to establish general allowances for loan losses. If an asset or portion thereof is classified as loss, the insured institution must either establish specific allowances for loan losses in the amount of 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss, or charge-off such amount. General loss allowances established to cover possible losses related to assets classified substandard or doubtful may be included in determining an institution’s regulatory capital, while specific valuation allowances for loan losses do not qualify as regulatory capital.

The Company’s general policy is to internally classify its assets on a regular basis and establish prudent general valuation allowances that are adequate to absorb losses that have not been identified but that are inherent in the loan portfolio. The Company maintains general valuation allowances that it believes are adequate to absorb losses in its loan portfolio that are not clearly attributable to specific loans. The Company’s general valuation allowances are within the following general ranges: (1) 0% to 5% of assets subject to special mention; (2) 5.00% to 100% of assets classified substandard; and (3) 50% to 100% of assets classified doubtful. Any loan classified as loss is charged-off. To further monitor and assess the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, loan delinquencies are reviewed to consider any developing problem loans. Based upon the procedures in place, considering the Company’s past charge-offs and recoveries and assessing the current risk elements in the portfolio, management believes the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2013, is adequate.

The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing loans and nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013:


		Current			30 – 59 Days Past Due			60 – 89 Days Past Due			90 Days + Past Due Accruing			90 Days + Past Due Non-accrual			Total Past Due			Total Loans

		(Dollars in Thousands)
September 30, 2013
First mortgage loans:
1 – 4 family dwellings	$		15,762	$		-	$		-	$		-	$		476	$		476	$		16,238
Construction			3,091			-			-			-			701			701			3,792
Land acquisition & development			1,084			-			-			-			-			-			1,084
Multi-family dwellings			2,703			-			-			-			-			-			2,703
Commercial			5,174			-			-			-			-			-			5,174

Consumer Loans:
Home equity			987			-			-			-			-			-			987
Home equity lines of credit			1,918			-			-			-			150			150			2,068
Other			243			-			-			-			-			-			243

Commercial Loans			1,849			-			-			-			-			-			1,849

Obligations (other than securities and leases) of states and political subdivisions			500			-			-			-			-			-			500

	$		33,311	$		-	$		-	$		-	$		1,327	$		1,327			34,638

Less: Deferred loan fees																					(23)
Allowance for loan loss																					(319)

Net Loans Receivable																			$		34,296


		Current			30 – 59 Days Past Due			60 – 89 Days Past Due			90 Days + Past Due Accruing			90 Days + Past Due Non-accrual			Total Past Due			Total Loans

		(Dollars in Thousands)
June 30, 2013
First mortgage loans:
1 – 4 family dwellings	$		13,089	$		45	$		-	$		-	$		477	$		522	$		13,611
Construction			1,845			-			-			-			701			701			2,546
Land acquisition & development			1,127			-			-			-			280			280			1,407
Multi-family dwellings			2,780			-			-			-			-			-			2,780
Commercial			5,787			-			-			-			-			-			5,787

Consumer Loans:
Home equity			1,085			-			-			-			-			-			1,085
Home equity lines of credit			1,906			-			-			-			150			150			2,056
Other			180			-			-			-			-			-			180

Commercial Loans			1,884			6			-			-			-			6			1,890

Obligations (other than securities and leases) of states and political subdivisions			500			-			-			-			-			-			500

	$		30,183	$		51	$		-	$		-	$		1,608	$		1,659			31,842

Less: Deferred loan fees																					(4)
Allowance for loan loss																					(307)

Net Loans Receivable																			$		31,531

Credit quality information

The following tables represent credit exposure by internally assigned grades for the period ended September 30, 2013. The grading system analysis estimates the capability of the borrower to repay the contractual obligations of the loan agreements as scheduled or not at all. The Company’s internal credit risk grading system is based on experiences with similarly graded loans.

The Company’s internally assigned grades are as follows:

Pass – loans which are protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the value of the underlying collateral.

Special Mention – loans where a potential weakness or risk exists, which could cause a more serious problem if not corrected.

Substandard – loans that have a well-defined weakness based on objective evidence and can be characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard loan. In addition, these weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, based on existing circumstances.

Loss – loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible, or of such value that continuance as a loan is not warranted.

The primary credit quality indicator used by management in the 1 – 4 family and consumer loan portfolios is the performance status of the loans. Payment activity is reviewed by Management on a monthly basis to determine how loans are performing. Loans are considered to be non-performing when they become 90 days delinquent, have a history of delinquency, or have other inherent characteristics which Management deems to be weaknesses.

The following tables presents the Company’s internally classified construction, land acquisition and development, multi-family residential, commercial real estate and commercial (not secured by real estate) loans at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013.


	September 30, 2013
		Construction			Land Acquisition & Development Loans			Multi-family Residential			Commercial Real Estate			Commercial			Obligations (other than securities and leases) of States and Political Subdivisions
	(Dollars in Thousands)

Pass	$		3,091	$		1,084	$		2,703	$		5,174	$		1,848	$		500
Special Mention			-			-			-			-			-			-
Substandard			701			-			-			-			1			-
Doubtful			-			-			-			-			-			-


Ending Balance	$		3,792	$		1,084	$		2,703	$		5,174	$		1,849	$		500


	June 30, 2013
		Construction			Land Acquisition & Development Loans			Multi-family Residential			Commercial Real Estate			Commercial			Obligations (other than securities and leases) of States and Political Subdivisions
	(Dollars in Thousands)

Pass	$		1,845	$		1,127	$		2,780	$		5,787	$		1,889	$		500
Special Mention			-			-			-			-			-			-
Substandard			701			280			-			-			1			-
Doubtful			-			-			-			-			-			-


Ending Balance	$		2,546	$		1,407	$		2,780	$		5,787	$		1,890	$		500

The following table presents performing and non-performing 1 – 4 family residential and consumer loans based on payment activity for the periods ended September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013.


	September 30, 2013
		1 – 4 Family			Consumer
	(Dollars in Thousands)

Performing	$		15,762	$		3,148
Non-performing			476			150


Total	$		16,238	$		3,298


	June 30, 2013
		1 – 4 Family			Consumer
	(Dollars in Thousands)

Performing	$		13,134	$		3,171
Non-performing			477			150


Total	$		13,611	$		3,321

The Company determines its allowance for loan losses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company uses a systematic methodology as required by Financial Reporting Release No. 28 and the various Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council guidelines. The Company also endeavors to adhere to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 102 in connection with loan loss allowance methodology and documentation issues.

Our methodology used to determine the allocated portion of the allowance is as follows. For groups of homogenous loans, we apply a loss rate to the groups’ aggregate balance. Our group loss rate reflects our historical loss experience. We may adjust these group rates to compensate for changes in environmental factors; but our adjustments have not been frequent due to a relatively stable charge-off experience. The Company also monitors industry loss experience on similar loan portfolio segments. We then identify loans for individual evaluation under ASC Topic 310. If the individually identified loans are performing, we apply a segment specific loss rate adjusted for relevant environmental factors, if necessary, for those loans reviewed individually and considered individually impaired, we use one of the three methods for measuring impairment mandated by ASC Topic 310. Generally the fair value of collateral is used since our impaired loans are generally real estate based. In connection with the fair value of collateral measurement, the Company generally uses an independent appraisal and determines costs to sell. The Company’s appraisals for commercial income based loans, such as multi-family and commercial real estate loans, assess value based upon the operating cash flows of the business as opposed to merely “as built” values. The Company then validates the reasonableness of our calculated allowances by: (1) reviewing trends in loan volume, delinquencies, restructurings and concentrations; (2) reviewing prior period (historical) charge-offs and recoveries; and (3) presenting the results of this process, quarterly, to the Asset Classification Committee and the Savings Bank’s Board of Directors. We then tabulate, format and summarize the current loan loss allowance balance for financial and regulatory reporting purposes.

The Company had no unallocated loss allowance balance at September 30, 2013.

The allowance for loan losses represents the amount which management estimates is adequate to provide for probable losses inherent in its loan portfolio. The allowance method is used in providing for loan losses. Accordingly, all loan losses are charged to the allowance, and all recoveries are credited to it. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to operations. The provision for loan losses is based on management’s periodic evaluation of individual loans, economic factors, past loan loss experience, changes in the composition and volume of the portfolio, and other relevant factors. The estimates used in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected on impaired loans, are particularly susceptible to changes in the near term.

The following tables present the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.


		As of September 30, 2013
		First Mortgage Loans
		1 – 4 Family			Construction			Land Acquisition & Development			Multi- family			Commercial			Consumer Loans			Commercial Loans			Total
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Beginning ALLL Balance at June 30, 2013	$		47	$		117	$		8	$		14	$		57	$		53	$		11	$		307
Charge-offs			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-
Recoveries			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-
Provisions			3			13			-			-			(2)			(1)			(1)			12

Ending ALLL Balance at September 30, 2013	$		50	$		130	$		8	$		14	$		55	$		52	$		10	$		319


		As of September 30, 2012
		First Mortgage Loans
		1 – 4 Family			Construction			Land Acquisition & Development			Multi- family			Commercial			Consumer Loans			Commercial Loans			Total
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Beginning ALLL Balance at June 30, 2012	$		73	$		122	$		21	$		26	$		76	$		53	$		14	$		385
Charge-offs			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-
Recoveries			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-
Provisions			(46)			20			(5)			(1)			4			4			-			(24)

Ending ALLL Balance at September 30, 2012	$		27	$		142	$		16	$		25	$		80	$		57	$		14	$		361

The following tables summarize the primary segments of the ALLL, segregated into the amount required for loans individually evaluated for impairment and the amount required for loans collectively evaluated for impairment as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013.


		As of September 30, 2013
		First Mortgage Loans
		1 – 4 Family			Construction			Land Acquisition & Development			Multi- family			Commercial			Consumer Loans			Commercial Loans			Total
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Individually evaluated for impairment	$		-	$		109	$		-	$		-	$		-	$		-	$		-	$		109
Collectively evaluated for impairment			50			21			8			14			55			52			10			210

	$		50	$		130	$		8	$		14	$		55	$		52	$		10	$		319


		As of June 30, 2013
		First Mortgage Loans
		1 – 4 Family			Construction			Land Acquisition & Development			Multi- family			Commercial			Consumer Loans			Commercial Loans			Total
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Individually evaluated for impairment	$		-	$		107	$		-	$		-	$		-	$		-	$		-	$		107
Collectively evaluated for impairment			47			10			8			14			57			53			11			200

	$		47	$		117	$		8	$		14	$		57	$		53	$		11	$		307

10.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for an asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. GAAP established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation methodologies into the following three levels:

Level I:

Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.

Level II:

Pricing inputs are other than the quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently and items that are fair-valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.

Level III:

Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

Fair values for securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. The Company has no Level I or Level III investment securities. Level II investment securities were primarily comprised of investment-grade corporate bonds and U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds of large foreign issuers.

The following tables present the assets reported on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by GAAP, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.


		September 30, 2013
		Level I			Level II			Level III			Total
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Investment securities – available for sale:
Corporate securities	$		-	$		60,571	$		-	$		60,571
Foreign debt securities ⁽¹⁾			-			3,145			-			3,145

	$		-	$		63,716	$		-	$		63,716


		June 30, 2013
		Level I			Level II			Level III			Total
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Investment securities – available for sale:
Corporate securities	$		-	$		73,465	$		-	$		73,465
Foreign debt securities ⁽¹⁾			-			3,721			-			3,721

	$		-	$		77,186	$		-	$		77,186

(1)

U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds of large foreign issuers

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market value that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period.

Impaired Loans

Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 310. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. Collateral values are estimated using Level II inputs based on observable market data or Level III inputs based on customized discounting criteria. For a majority of impaired real estate related loans, the Company obtains a current external appraisal. Other valuation techniques are used as well, including internal valuations, comparable property analysis and contractual sales information. The Company has no Level I or Level II impaired loans. Level III impaired loans were primarily comprised of one single-family residential construction loan, one land loan, and one home equity line of credit.

The following tables present the assets reported on a non-recurring basis on the consolidated balance sheet at their fair values as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by GAAP, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.


		September 30, 2013
		Level I			Level II			Level III			Total
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans	$		-	$		-	$		742	$		742


Total	$		-	$		-	$		742	$		742


		June 30, 2013
		Level I			Level II			Level III			Total
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans	$		-	$		-	$		1,024	$		1,024


Total	$		-	$		-	$		1,024	$		1,024

For Level III assets measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, the significant observable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:

Fair Value at

September 30,

2013

June 30,

2013

Valuation
Technique

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

Significant Unobservable
Input Range (Weighted
Average)

(Dollars in Thousands)

Impaired loans

742

1,024

Appraisal of
collateral⁽¹⁾

Discounted
appraisal⁽²⁾

0% to 9.8% / 7.7%

⁽¹⁾

Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various level III inputs which are not identifiable.

⁽²⁾

Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions. The range and weighted average of appraisal adjustments are presented as a percentage of the appraisals.

When evaluating the value of the collateral on impaired loans, the Company will consider the age of the most current appraisal, and discount the appraised value from 1.0% to 15.0%.

The Company classifies financial instruments in Level III of the fair value hierarchy when there is reliance on at least one significant unobservable input to the valuation model. In addition to these unobservable inputs, the valuation model for Level III financial instruments typically also rely on a number of inputs that are readily observable, either directly or indirectly.

11.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values are as follows:


		September 30, 2013
		Carrying			Fair
		Amount			Value			Level I			Level II			Level III
		(Dollars in Thousands)

FINANCIAL ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$		2,467	$		2,467	$		2,467	$		-	$		-
Certificates of deposit			598			598			598			-			-
Investment securities – available for sale			63,716			63,716			-			63,716			-
Investment securities – held to maturity			22,172			22,515			-			22,515			-
Mortgage-backed securities – held to maturity:
Agency			157,428			157,358			-			157,358			-
Private-label			3,104			3,625			-			-			3,625
Net loans receivable			34,296			35,801			-			-			35,801
Accrued interest receivable			1,464			1,464			1,464			-			-
FHLB stock			5,211			5,211			5,211			-			-
Bank owned life insurance			2,000			2,000			2,000			-			-

FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing deposits	$		17,940	$		17,940	$		17,940	$		-	$		-
NOW accounts			20,930			20,930			20,930			-			-
Savings accounts			41,808			41,808			41,808			-			-
Money market accounts			24,431			24,431			24,431			-			-
Certificates of deposit			38,092			38,131			-			-			38,131
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance			251			251			251			-			-
FHLB long-term advances			17,500			18,057			-			-			18,057
FHLB short-term advances			102,070			102,070			102,070			-			-
Accrued interest payable			212			212			212			-			-


		June 30, 2013
		Carrying			Fair
		Amount			Value			Level I			Level II			Level III
		(Dollars in Thousands)

FINANCIAL ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$		1,927	$		1,927	$		1,927	$		-	$		-
Certificates of deposit			598			598			598			-			-
Investment securities – available for sale			77,186			77,186			-			77,186			-
Investment securities – held to maturity			26,420			26,956			-			26,956			-
Mortgage-backed securities – held to maturity:
Agency			135,621			135,733			-			135,733			-
Private-label			3,647			4,265			-			109			4,156
Net loans receivable			31,531			33,194			-			-			33,194
Accrued interest receivable			1,371			1,371			1,371			-			-
FHLB stock			5,682			5,682			5,682			-			-
Bank owned life insurance			4,026			4,026			4,026			-			-

FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing deposits	$		14,911	$		14,911	$		14,911	$		-	$		-
NOW accounts			20,654			20,654			20,654			-			-
Savings accounts			41,808			41,808			41,808			-			-
Money market accounts			23,772			23,772			23,772			-			-
Certificates of deposit			38,829			38,885			-			-			38,885
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance			550			550			550			-			-
FHLB long-term advances			17,500			18,525			-			-			18,525
FHLB short-term advances			96,712			96,712			96,712			-			-
Accrued interest payable			210			210			210			-			-

Financial instruments are defined as cash, evidence of an ownership interest in an entity, or a contract which creates an obligation or right to receive or deliver cash or another financial instrument from or to a second entity on potentially favorable or unfavorable terms.

Fair value is defined as the amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. If a quoted market price is available for a financial instrument, the estimated fair value would be calculated based upon the market price per trading unit of the instrument.

If no readily available market exists, the fair value estimates for financial instruments should be based upon management’s judgment regarding current economic conditions, interest rate risk, expected cash flows, future estimated losses, and other factors, as determined through various option pricing formulas or simulation modeling. As many of these assumptions result from judgments made by management based upon estimates, which are inherently uncertain, the resulting estimated values may not be indicative of the amount realizable in the sale of a particular financial instrument. In addition, changes in the assumptions on which the estimated values are based may have a significant impact on the resulting estimated values.

As certain assets and liabilities, such as deferred tax assets, premises and equipment, and many other operational elements of the Company, are not considered financial instruments, but have value, this estimated fair value of financial instruments would not represent the full market value of the Company.

Estimated fair values have been determined by the Company using the best available data, as generally provided in internal Savings Bank regulatory, or third party valuation reports, using an estimation methodology suitable for each category of financial instruments. The estimation methodologies used are as follows:

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Certificates of Deposit, Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable, and FHLB Short-term Advances

The fair value approximates the current carrying value.

Investment Securities, Mortgage-Backed Securities, and FHLB Stock

The fair value of investment and mortgage-backed securities is equal to the available quoted market price. If no quoted market price is available, fair value is estimated using the quoted market price for similar securities. For discussion of valuation of private-label CMOs, see Note 8 “Unrealized Losses on Securities”. Since the FHLB stock is not actively traded on a secondary market and held exclusively by member financial institutions, the estimated fair market value approximates the carrying amount.

Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”)

The fair value of BOLI at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013 approximated the cash surrender value of the policies at these dates.

Net Loans Receivable and Deposits

Fair value for consumer mortgage loans is estimated using market quotes or discounting contractual cash flows for prepayment estimates. Discount rates were obtained from secondary market sources, adjusted to reflect differences in servicing, credit, and other characteristics.

The estimated fair values for consumer, fixed-rate commercial, and multi-family real estate loans are estimated by discounting contractual cash flows for prepayment estimates. Discount rates are based upon rates generally charged for such loans with similar credit characteristics.

The estimated fair value for nonperforming loans is the appraised value of the underlying collateral adjusted for estimated credit risk.

Demand, savings, and money market deposit accounts are reported at book value. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based upon the discounted value of the contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using average market rates for deposits with similar average terms.

FHLB Long-term Advances

The fair values of fixed-rate advances are estimated using discounted cash flows, based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying amount on variable rate advances approximates their fair value.

Commitments to Extend Credit

These financial instruments are generally not subject to sale, and estimated fair values are not readily available. The carrying value, represented by the net deferred fee arising from the unrecognized commitment, and the fair value, determined by discounting the remaining contractual fee over the term of the commitment using fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements with similar credit risk, is not considered material for disclosure.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

In the normal course of business, we, in an effort to help keep our shareholders and the public informed about our operations, may from time to time issue or make certain statements, either in writing or orally, that are or contain forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in the U.S. federal securities laws. Generally, these statements relate to business plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits from acquisitions made by or to be made by us, projections involving anticipated revenues, earnings, profitability or other aspects of operating results or other future developments in our affairs or the industry in which we conduct business. Forward-looking statements may be identified by reference to a future period or periods or by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “anticipated,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate” or similar expressions.

Although we believe that the anticipated results or other expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that those results or expectations will be attained. Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions (some of which are beyond our control), and as a result actual results may differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following, as well as those discussed elsewhere herein:

•

our investments in our businesses and in related technology could require additional incremental spending, and might not produce expected deposit and loan growth and anticipated contributions to our earnings;

•

general economic or industry conditions could be less favorable than expected, resulting in a deterioration in credit quality, a change in the allowance for loan losses or a reduced demand for credit or fee-based products and services;

•

changes in the interest rate environment could reduce net interest income and could increase credit losses;

•

the conditions of the securities markets could change, which could adversely affect, among other things, the value or credit quality of our assets, the availability and terms of funding necessary to meet our liquidity needs and our ability to originate loans and leases;

•

changes in the extensive laws, regulations and policies governing financial holding companies and their subsidiaries could alter our business environment or affect our operations;

•

the potential need to adapt to industry changes in information technology systems, on which we are highly dependent, could present operational issues or require significant capital spending;

•

competitive pressures could intensify and affect our profitability, including as a result of continued industry consolidation, the increased availability of financial services from non-banks, technological developments such as the internet or bank regulatory reform; and

•

acts or threats of terrorism and actions taken by the United States or other governments as a result of such acts or threats, including possible military action, could further adversely affect

business and economic conditions in the United States generally and in our principal markets, which could have an adverse effect on our financial performance and that of our borrowers and on the financial markets and the price of our common stock.

You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update them in light of new or future events except to the extent required by federal securities laws.

GENERAL

WVS Financial Corp. (the “Company”) is the parent holding company of West View Savings Bank (“West View” or the “Savings Bank”). The Company was organized in July 1993 as a Pennsylvania-chartered unitary bank holding company and acquired 100% of the common stock of the Savings Bank in November 1993.

West View Savings Bank is a Pennsylvania-chartered, FDIC-insured stock savings bank conducting business from six offices in the North Hills suburbs of Pittsburgh. The Savings Bank converted from the mutual to the stock form of ownership in November 1993. The Savings Bank had no subsidiaries at September 30, 2013.

The operating results of the Company depend primarily upon its net interest income, which is determined by the difference between income on interest-earning assets, principally loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, which consist primarily of deposits and borrowings. The Company’s net income is also affected by its provision for loan losses, as well as the level of its non-interest income, including loan fees and service charges, and its non-interest expenses, such as compensation and employee benefits, income taxes, deposit insurance and occupancy costs.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

The Company’s assets totaled $296.0 million at September 30, 2013, as compared to $287.6 million at June 30, 2013. The $8.4 million or 2.9% increase in total assets was primarily comprised of a $21.3 million increase in mortgage-backed securities – held to maturity, a $2.0 million increase in bank owned life insurance, a $2.8 million increase in net loans receivable, a $540 thousand increase in cash and cash equivalents, and a $93 thousand increase in accrued interest receivable, which were partially offset by a $13.5 million decrease in investment securities available for sale, a $4.2 million decrease in investment securities held to maturity, a $71 thousand decrease in other assets, and a $471 thousand decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. The increase in mortgage-backed securities held to maturity was primarily due to purchases of floating-rate U.S. Government agency CMO’s totaling $29.2 million, which was partially offset by repayments on floating-rate U.S. Government agency CMO’s and floating-rate private-label CMO’s totaling $7.4 million and $688 thousand, respectively. The decrease in investment securities available for sale was primarily due to maturities and early redemptions of investment-grade corporate bonds and U.S. dollar denominated investment-grade foreign bonds totaling $12.2 million and $550 thousand, respectively. The decrease in investment securities held to maturity was primarily due to maturities and early redemptions of investment-grade corporate bonds and U.S. dollar denominated investment-grade foreign bonds totaling $4.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock was due to the continued redemption of excess stock by the FHLB of Pittsburgh. See “Asset and Liability Management”.

The Company’s total liabilities increased $8.1 million or 3.2% to $263.9 million as of September 30, 2013 from $255.7 million as of June 30, 2013. The $8.1 million increase in total liabilities was primarily comprised of a $5.4 million or 5.5% increase in short-term FHLB advances and a $2.9 million or 2.1% increase in total savings deposits, which were partially offset by a $147 thousand or 18.3% decrease in other liabilities. The increase in FHLB short-term advances was primarily a result of funding needs for the

purchase of mortgage-backed securities. The increase in total deposits was primarily due to a $3.2 million seasonal increase in non-interest bearing accounts applicable to local real estate tax collectors, which was partially offset by a $299 thousand seasonal decrease in advance payments by borrowers for real estate taxes. See also “Asset and Liability Management”.

Total stockholders’ equity increased $241 thousand or 0.8% to $32.1 million as of September 30, 2013, from approximately $31.8 million as of June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily attributable to Company net income of $210 thousand and other comprehensive income totaling $108 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2013, which were partially offset by cash dividends totaling $82 thousand. The other comprehensive income was primarily attributable to a $95 thousand (net of tax effect) reversal of unrealized holding losses on three private-label CMO’s with previously identified OTTI, and $13 thousand (net of tax effect) of unrealized holding gains on the Company’s available for sale investment portfolio.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General. WVS reported net income of $210 thousand or $0.10 earnings per share (basic and diluted) for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Net income decreased by $175 thousand or 45.5% and earnings per share (basic and diluted) decreased $0.09 or 47.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease in net income was primarily attributable to a $187 thousand decrease in net-interest income, a $36 thousand increase in the provision for loan losses, and a $33 thousand increase in income tax expense, which were partially offset by a $74 thousand decrease in non-interest expense, and a $7 thousand increase in non-interest income.

Net Interest Income. The Company’s net interest income decreased by $187 thousand or 15.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease in net interest income was attributable to a $215 thousand decrease in interest income, which was partially offset by a $28 thousand decrease in interest expense. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to lower average balances on the Company’s investment and loan portfolios, and lower realized yields on the Company’s loan, investment, and private-label CMO portfolios, which were partially offset by higher average balances on the Company’s U.S. Government agency CMO portfolio and higher realized yields on the Company’s holding of FHLB stock, when compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease in interest expense was primarily attributable to lower rates paid on the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities during the quarter ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012.

Interest Income. Interest income on investment securities decreased $282 thousand or 36.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to a $60.0 million decrease in the average balance of investment securities outstanding, when compared to the same period in 2012.

Interest income on net loans receivable decreased $172 thousand or 29.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to a $5.3 million decrease in the average balance of net loans receivable outstanding, and a decrease of 1.10 basis points in the weighted average yield earned on net loans receivable for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease in the average balance of loans outstanding was primarily attributable to lower construction and mortgage loans outstanding. The decrease in the yield on loans was primarily attributable to payoffs of higher yielding construction loans. The quarter ended September 30, 2012, also included non-recurring collection of past due interest and late charges of approximately $36 thousand.

Interest income on mortgage-backed securities increased $227 thousand or 91.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The increase for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to a $79.4 million increase in the average balance of U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities outstanding, which were partially offset by a $5.9 million decrease in the average balance of private-label mortgage-backed securities outstanding, and a 79 basis point decrease in the weighted average yield earned on U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed

securities for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease in the average balances of private-label mortgage-backed securities during the three months ended September 30, 2013 was attributable to principal paydowns of private-label mortgage-backed securities during the period. The increase in the average balance of U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities for the three months ended September 30, 2013, was primarily attributable to $29.2 million in purchases of U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities during the quarter, which was partially offset by $7.4 million in repayments on the U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities portfolio, when compared to the same period in 2012.

Interest income on Federal Home Loan Bank stock increased $11 thousand or 550.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The increase for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to an 81 basis point increase in the weighted average yield earned when compared to the same period in 2012.

Interest income on FDIC insured bank certificates of deposit increased $1 thousand or 50.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The increase for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to a $248 thousand decrease in the average portfolio balance of certificates of deposit which was more than offset by a 106 basis point increase in the weighted average yield earned when compared to the same period in 2012. The certificates have remaining maturities ranging from eleven to one hundred fourteen months. Due to decreases in yields in this investment sector, the Company has decided to redeploy maturities and early issuer redemptions to other investment portfolio segments.

Interest Expense. Interest expense on deposits and escrows decreased $29 thousand or 26.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease in interest expense on deposits for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to a 20 basis point decrease in the weighted average rate paid on time deposits, a $1.3 million decrease in the average balance of time deposits, a 2 basis point decrease in the weighted average rate paid on savings accounts, and a 3 basis point decrease in the weighted average rate paid on money market accounts.

Interest paid on FHLB advances increased $1 thousand or 0.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The increase for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to a $7.9 million increase in the average balance of FHLB short-term advances, which was partially offset by a 2 basis point decrease in the weighted average rate paid on FHLB short-term advances, when compared to the same period in 2012. The Company increased its average balances of FHLB short-term borrowings during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 primarily to fund purchases of mortgage-backed securities.

Provision for Loan Losses. A provision for loan losses is charged to earnings to maintain the total allowance at a level considered adequate by management to absorb potential losses in the portfolio. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on an evaluation of the portfolio considering past experience, current economic conditions, volume, growth and composition of the loan portfolio, and other relevant factors.

Provisions for loan losses increased $36 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The change in the provisions for loan losses was primarily attributable to provisions recorded due to higher quarter end loan balances at September 30, 2013, as opposed to a credit provision recorded during the quarter ended September 30, 2012, related to lower classified loan balances during that period. At September 30, 2013, the Company’s total allowance for loan losses amounted to $319 thousand or 0.9% of the Company’s total loan portfolio, as compared to $307 thousand or 1.0% at June 30, 2013. At September 30, 2013, the Company’s non-performing loans totaled $1.3 million as compared to $1.6 million at June 30, 2013.

Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income increased by $7 thousand or 5.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The increase for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to a $26 thousand increase in earnings on

bank-owned life insurance, which was partially offset by a $10 thousand decrease in mortgage-loan correspondent fee income, an $8 thousand decrease in realized gains on the sale of investment securities, and a $2 thousand decrease in automated teller machine fee income, when compared to the same period in 2012.

Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense decreased $74 thousand or 7.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was principally attributable to a decrease of $85 thousand in charitable contributions which are eligible for PA tax credits, which was partially offset by an $18 thousand increase in employee related expenses, and an $11 thousand increase in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) deposit insurance expense, when compared to the same period in 2012.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased $33 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012. The increase for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily due to lower levels of PA tax credits during the three months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the same period in 2012.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $622 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2013. Net cash provided by operating activities was primarily comprised of net income of $210 thousand, $570 thousand of amortization of investment premiums, a $52 thousand decrease in deferred income taxes, and $21 thousand in depreciation of the Company’s fixed assets, which were partially offset by a $147 thousand decrease in other liabilities, a $93 thousand decrease in accrued interest receivable, and a $26 thousand increase in the cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance.

Funds used for investing activities totaled $8.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2013. Primary uses of funds during the three months ended September 30, 2013 were purchases of: mortgage-backed securities held to maturity and investment securities held to maturity of $29.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively, a $2.8 million increase in net loans receivable, and a $2.0 purchase of bank-owned life insurance. Primary sources of funds during the three months ended September 30, 2013 consisted of proceeds from investments and mortgage-backed securities within the held to maturity portfolio totaling $6.2 million and $8.0 million, respectively, proceeds from investment securities in the available for sale portfolio of $12.9 million and $471 thousand of FHLB stock redemptions.

Funds provided by financing activities totaled $8.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The primary sources included a $5.4 million increase in FHLB short-term borrowings, and a $4.0 million increase in transaction and savings deposits, which were partially offset by a $737 thousand decrease in retail certificates of deposit, a $299 thousand decrease in escrow accounts, and $82 thousand in cash dividends paid on the Company’s common stock. The $5.4 million increase in FHLB short-term borrowings was primarily used to fund investment and mortgage-backed securities purchases. Management believes that a significant portion of our local maturing deposits will remain with the Company.

The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, amortization, repayments and maturities of existing loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities, funds from operations, and funds obtained through FHLB advances and other borrowings. Certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in one year or less at September 30, 2013 totaled $29.1 million.

Historically, the Company used its sources of funds primarily to meet its ongoing commitments to pay maturing savings certificates and savings withdrawals, fund loan commitments and maintain a substantial portfolio of investment securities. At September 30, 2013, total approved loan commitments outstanding were $235 thousand. At the same date, commitments under unused lines of credit amounted to $5.8 million and the unadvanced portion of construction loans approximated $3.7 million. The Company has been able to generate sufficient cash through the retail deposit market, its traditional funding source, and through FHLB advances, and other borrowings, to provide the cash utilized in investing activities. The Company’s available

for sale segment of the investment portfolio totaled $63.4 million at September 30, 2013. Management believes that the Company currently has adequate liquidity available to respond to liquidity demands.

On October 29, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.04 per share payable November 21, 2013, to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 11, 2013. Dividends are subject to determination and declaration by the Board of Directors, which take into account the Company’s financial condition, statutory and regulatory restrictions, general economic conditions and other factors. There can be no assurance that dividends will in fact be paid on the Common Stock in future periods or that, if paid, such dividends will not be reduced or eliminated.

As of September 30, 2013, WVS Financial Corp. exceeded all regulatory capital requirements and maintained Tier I and total risk-based capital equal to $32.7 million or 22.7% and $33.1 million or 22.9%, respectively, of total risk-weighted assets, and Tier I leverage capital of $32.7 million or 11.1% of average quarterly assets.

Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans and real estate owned. A loan is placed on nonaccrual status when, in the judgment of management, the probability of collection of interest is deemed insufficient to warrant further accrual. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, previously accrued but uncollected interest is deducted from interest income. The Company normally does not accrue interest on loans past due 90 days or more, however, interest may be accrued if management believes that it will collect on the loan.

The Company’s nonperforming assets at September 30, 2013 totaled approximately $1.3 million or 0.4% of total assets as compared to $1.6 million or 0.6% of total assets at June 30, 2013. Nonperforming assets at September 30, 2013 consisted of: three single-family real estate loans totaling $476 thousand, one single-family construction loans totaling $701 thousand, and one home equity line of credit totaling $150 thousand. The loans are in various stages of collection activity.

The $281 thousand decrease in nonperforming assets during the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to the sale of one land loan totaling $280 thousand.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company collected $2 thousand of interest income on non-accrual loans. Approximately $22 thousand of interest income would have been recorded on non-accrual loans if such loans had been current according to the original loan agreements for the entire period. These amounts were not included in the Company’s interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The Company continues to work with the borrowers in an attempt to cure the defaults and is also pursuing various legal avenues in order to collect on these loans.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

The Company’s primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk and, to a lesser extent, liquidity risk. All of the Company’s transactions are denominated in US dollars with no specific foreign exchange exposure. The Savings Bank has no agricultural loan assets and therefore would not have a specific exposure to changes in commodity prices. Any impacts that changes in foreign exchange rates and commodity prices would have on interest rates are assumed to be exogenous and will be analyzed on an ex post basis.

Interest rate risk (“IRR”) is the exposure of a banking organization’s financial condition to adverse movements in interest rates. Accepting this risk can be an important source of profitability and shareholder value, however excessive levels of IRR can pose a significant threat to the Company’s earnings and capital base. Accordingly, effective risk management that maintains IRR at prudent levels is essential to the Company’s safety and soundness.

Evaluating a financial institution’s exposure to changes in interest rates includes assessing both the adequacy of the management process used to control IRR and the organization’s quantitative level of exposure. When assessing the IRR management process, the Company seeks to ensure that appropriate policies, procedures, management information systems and internal controls are in place to maintain IRR at prudent levels with consistency and continuity. Evaluating the quantitative level of IRR exposure requires the Company to assess the existing and potential future effects of changes in interest rates on its consolidated financial condition, including capital adequacy, earnings, liquidity, and, where appropriate, asset quality.

On September 13, 2012, the FOMC issued a press release indicating that economic activity has continued to expand at a moderate pace, growth in employment has been slow and the unemployment rate remains elevated. The FOMC noted its concern that, without further policy accommodation, economic growth might not be strong enough to generate sustained improvement in labor market conditions. Strains in global financial markets continue to pose significant downside risks to the economic outlook. The FOMC also anticipates that inflation over the medium term likely would run at or below its 2 percent objective. To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with its dual mandate to foster maximum employment and price stability, the FOMC agreed to increase policy accommodation by purchasing additional agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $40 billion per month. The FOMC also indicated that it would continue through the end of calendar year 2012 a program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities announced in June 2012, and it is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and mortgage-backed securities into mortgage-backed securities. These actions, which together will increase the FOMC’s holdings of longer-term securities by about $85 billion each month through the end of calendar year 2012, is expected to put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative.

On December 12, 2012, the FOMC issued a press release outlining its plans for securities purchases in calendar year 2013 and provided additional guidance for the targeted federal funds rate and the expected duration of the highly accommodative stance of monetary policy. The FOMC also indicated that it expects that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable period of time after the economic recovery strengthens. The FOMC decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¹/₄ percent and currently anticipates that exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate to be warranted at least through mid-2015. To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with its dual mandate, the FOMC will continue purchasing additional agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $40 billion per month. The FOMC also will purchase longer-term Treasury securities after its program to

extend the average maturity of its holdings of Treasury securities is completed at the end of the year, initially at a pace of $45 billion per month. The FOMC is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and, in January, will resume rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. Taken together, these actions should maintain downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative.

The FOMC will closely monitor incoming information on economic and financial developments in coming months. If the outlook for the labor market does not improve substantially, the FOMC will continue its purchases of Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities, and employ its other policy tools as appropriate, until such improvement is achieved in a context of price stability. In determining the size, pace, and composition of its asset purchases, the FOMC will take appropriate account of the likely efficacy and costs of such purchases.

To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the FOMC expects that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the asset purchase program ends and the economic recovery strengthens. In particular, the FOMC decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that this exceptionally low range for the federal funds rate will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6-1/2 percent, inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than a half percentage point above the FOMC’s 2 percent longer-run goal, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well anchored. The FOMC views these thresholds as consistent with its earlier date-based guidance. In determining how long to maintain a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy, the FOMC will also consider other information, including additional measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments. When the FOMC decides to begin to remove policy accommodation, it will take a balanced approach consistent with its longer-run goals of maximum employment and inflation of 2 percent.

The FOMC has continued to purchase additional mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $40 billion per month and longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of $45 billion per month. The FOMC also maintained its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. Taken together, these actions should maintain downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company continued to adjust its asset/liability management tactics in two ways. First, the Company increased total assets by about $8.4 million while continuing to manage its Tier 1 capital. The primary segments of asset growth for the three months ended September 30, 2013 were: mortgage-backed securities – held to maturity, $21.3 million, bank-owned life insurance - $2.0 million, and net loans receivable - $2.8 million, which were partially offset by decreases in investment securities available for sale - $13.5 million, investment securities – held to maturity - $4.2 million, and FHLB stock - $471 thousand. Second, we increased Tier 1 capital primarily through earnings retention. We anticipate maintaining our asset base in the range of $285 - $300 million for the remainder of calendar year 2013, subject to economic and market conditions.

Financial institutions derive their income primarily from the excess of interest collected over interest paid. The rates of interest an institution earns on its assets and owes on its liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Since market interest rates change over time, an institution is exposed to lower profit margins (or losses) if it cannot adapt to interest-rate changes. For example, assume that an institution’s assets carry intermediate- or long-term fixed rates and that those assets were funded with short-term liabilities. If market interest rates rise by the time the short-term liabilities must be refinanced, the increase in the institution’s interest expense on its liabilities may not be sufficiently offset if assets continue to earn at the long-term fixed rates. Accordingly, an institution’s profits could decrease on existing assets because the institution will either have lower net interest income or, possibly, net interest expense. Similar

risks exist when assets are subject to contractual interest-rate ceilings, or rate sensitive assets are funded by longer-term, fixed-rate liabilities in a decreasing-rate environment.

During the fiscal year 2013 and into fiscal year 2014, intermediate and long-term market interest rates fluctuated considerably. Many central banks, including the Federal Reserve, continued above normal levels of monetary accommodation including quantitative easing and targeted asset purchase programs. The desired outcomes of these programs are to stimulate aggregate demand, reduce high levels of unemployment and to further lower market interest rates.

The table below shows the targeted federal funds rate and the benchmark two and ten year treasury yields at quarter ends beginning in June 30, 2007, and extending through September 30, 2013. The difference in yields on the two year and ten year Treasury’s is often used to determine the steepness of the yield curve and to assess the term premium of market interest rates.


		Yield on:
	Targeted Federal Funds	Two (2) Year Treasury	Ten (10) Year Treasury	Shape of Yield Curve

June 30, 2007	5.25%	4.87%	5.03%	Slightly Positive
September 30, 2007	4.75%	3.97%	4.59%	Moderately Positive
December 31, 2007	4.25%	3.05%	4.04%	Positive
March 31, 2008	2.25%	1.62%	3.45%	Positive
June 30, 2008	2.00%	2.63%	3.99%	Positive
September 30, 2008	2.00%	2.00%	3.85%	Positive
December 31, 2008	0.00% to 0.25%	0.76%	2.25%	Positive
March 31, 2009	0.00% to 0.25%	0.81%	2.71%	Positive
June 30, 2009	0.00% to 0.25%	1.11%	3.53%	Positive
September 30, 2009	0.00% to 0.25%	0.95%	3.31%	Positive
December 31, 2009	0.00% to 0.25%	1.14%	3.85%	Positive
March 31, 2010	0.00% to 0.25%	1.02%	3.84%	Positive
June 30, 2010	0.00% to 0.25%	0.61%	2.97%	Positive
September 30, 2010	0.00% to 0.25%	0.42%	2.53%	Positive
December 31, 2010	0.00% to 0.25%	0.61%	3.30%	Positive
March 31, 2011	0.00% to 0.25%	0.80%	3.46%	Positive
June 30, 2011	0.00% to 0.25%	0.45%	3.18%	Positive
September 30, 2011	0.00% to 0.25%	0.25%	1.92%	Positive
December 31, 2011	0.00% to 0.25%	0.25%	1.89%	Positive
March 31, 2012	0.00% to 0.25%	0.33%	2.23%	Positive
June 30, 2012	0.00% to 0.25%	0.33%	1.67%	Positive
September 30, 2012	0.00% to 0.25%	0.23%	1.65%	Positive
December 31, 2012	0.00% to 0.25%	0.24%	1.85%	Positive
March 31, 2013	0.00% to 0.25%	0.25%	1.87%	Positive
June 30, 2013	0.00% to 0.25%	0.36%	2.52%	Positive
September 30, 2013	0.00% to 0.25%	0.33%	2.64%	Positive

These changes in intermediate and long-term market interest rates, the changing slope of the Treasury yield curve, and higher levels of interest rate volatility have impacted prepayments on the Company’s loan, investment and mortgage-backed securities portfolios. Principal repayments on the Company’s loan, investment, and mortgage-backed securities portfolios for the three months ended September 30, 2013, totaled $1.8 million, $19.1 million, and $8.0 million, respectively. Despite stagnant global interest rates and Treasury yields the Company continued to grow its balance sheet and used proceeds from maturities and Corporate calls of bonds, repayments on its mortgage-backed securities, and borrowings to purchase U.S. Government agency bonds, and U.S. Government agency CMO’s.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Company increased its originations of: fixed rate single-family mortgages by approximately $2.3 million, and residential construction loans by $700 thousand, which were partially offset by a $323 thousand decrease in land acquisition and development loans. The Company also makes available for origination residential mortgage loans with interest rates which adjust pursuant to a designated index, although customer acceptance has been somewhat limited in the Savings Bank’s market area. We expect that the housing market will continue to be weak throughout fiscal 2014. The Company will continue to selectively offer commercial real estate, land acquisition and development, and shorter-term construction loans (primarily on residential properties), and commercial loans on business assets to partially increase interest income while limiting credit and interest rate risk. The Company has also offered higher yielding commercial and small business loans to existing customers and seasoned prospective customers.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, principal investment purchases were comprised of: floating rate U.S. Government agency CMO’s - $29.2 million with a weighted average yield of 1.84% and callable U.S. Government agency multiple step-up bonds with initial lock out periods of 1 – 12 months - $2.0 million with a weighted average yield to call of 2.01%. Single step-up bonds have one “step” or increase in coupon. Multiple step-up bonds have more than one “step” or increase in coupon. All of the purchases were classified as held to maturity for accounting purposes. The Company believes that the purchases will earn a return above the Company’s cost of funds.

Major investment proceeds received during the three months ended September 30, 2013 were: investment grade corporate bonds - $14.2 million with a weighted average yield of approximately 2.00%; investment grade corporate utility first mortgage bonds - $2.2 million with a weighted average yield of 4.89%; and investment grade foreign bonds - $2.6 million with a weighted average yield of 4.60%.

As of September 30, 2013, the implementation of these asset and liability management initiatives resulted in the following:

$168.3 million or 56.9% of the Company’s assets were comprised of floating rate investment and mortgage-backed securities. Of this $168.3 million, approximately $160.5 million float on a monthly basis based upon changes in the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and about $7.8 million reprice on a quarterly basis based upon the three-month LIBOR.

$160.5 million or 65.2% of the Company’s total investment portfolio was comprised of floating rate mortgage-backed securities (including collateralized mortgage obligations – “CMOs”) that reprice on a monthly basis;

$66.0 million or 26.8% of the Company’s investment portfolio consisted of investment grade fixed-rate corporate bonds with remaining maturities as follows: 3 months or less - $10.4 million or 15.8%; 3 – 12 months - $24.6 million or 37.3%; 1 – 2 years - $14.9 million or 22.6%; 2 – 3 years - $12.4 million or 18.7%; 3 – 5 years - $2.6 million or 3.9%; and over 5 years - $1.1 million or 1.7%;

$12.0 million or 4.9% of the Company’s investment portfolio was comprised of callable U.S. Government Agency multiple step-up bonds which are callable as follows: less than 3 months - $10.0 million or 83.3%; and 3 – 6 months - $2.0 million or 16.7%. These bonds may or may not actually be redeemed prior to maturity (i.e. called) depending upon the level of market interest rates at their respective call dates;

$63.7 million or 21.5% of the Company’s assets were comprised of investment securities classified as available for sale;

An aggregate of $14.0 million or 41.0% of the Company’s net loan portfolio had adjustable interest rates or maturities of less than 12 months; and

The maturity distribution of the Company’s borrowings is as follows: 3 months or less - $102.1 million or 85.4%; 3 – 12 months - $5.0 million or 4.2%; 2 – 3 years - $2.5 million or 2.1%; and over 3 years - $10.0 million or 8.3%.

The effect of interest rate changes on a financial institution’s assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the “interest rate sensitivity” of the assets and liabilities and by monitoring an institution’s interest rate sensitivity “gap”. An asset or liability is said to be interest rate sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within a given time period. A gap is considered positive (negative) when the

amount of rate sensitive assets (liabilities) exceeds the amount of rate sensitive liabilities (assets). During a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of rising interest rates, a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income.

As part of its asset/liability management strategy, the Company maintained an asset sensitive financial position due to unusually low market interest rates. An asset sensitive financial position may benefit earnings during a period of rising interest rates and reduce earnings during a period of declining interest rates.

The following table sets forth certain information at the dates indicated relating to the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities which are estimated to mature or are scheduled to reprice within one year.


	September 30,		June 30,
	2013		2013		2012
			(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within one year		$239,706		$236,125		$180,617
Interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within one year		194,229		188,841		165,879


Interest sensitivity gap		$ 45,477		$ 47,284		$ 14,738

Interest sensitivity gap as a percentage of total assets		15.37%		16.44%		5.39%
Ratio of assets to liabilities maturing or repricing within one year		123.41%		125.04%		108.88%

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company managed its one-year interest sensitivity gap by: (1) purchasing $29.2 million of floating-rate U.S. Government agency CMO’s which reprice monthly; (2) increasing by approximately $5.4 million the Company’s borrowings that mature within one year. All of the referenced purchases were designated as held to maturity for accounting purposes. At September 30, 2013, investments available for sale totaled $63.7 million or 21.5% of total assets.

The following table illustrates the Company’s estimated stressed cumulative repricing gap – the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities expected to reprice at a given point in time – at September 30, 2013. The table estimates the impact of an upward or downward change in market interest rates of 100 and 200 basis points.

Cumulative Stressed Repricing Gap


	Month 3			Month 6			Month 12			Month 24			Month 36			Month 60			Long Term
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Base Case Up 200 bp
Cumulative Gap ($’s)		$56,569			$50,955			$43,373			$45,206			$52,326			$38,459			$25,401
% of Total Assets		19.1	%		17.2	%		14.7	%		15.3	%		17.7	%		13.0	%		8.6	%
Base Case Up 100 bp
Cumulative Gap ($’s)		$56,820			$51,403			$44,156			$46,386			$53,561			$39,706			$25,401
% of Total Assets		19.2	%		17.4	%		14.9	%		15.7	%		18.1	%		13.4	%		8.6	%
Base Case No Change
Cumulative Gap ($’s)		$57,050			$52,053			$45,477			$48,588			$55,944			$42,044			$25,401
% of Total Assets		19.3	%		17.6	%		15.4	%		16.4	%		18.9	%		14.2	%		8.6	%
Base Case Down 100 bp
Cumulative Gap ($’s)		$57,809			$53,188			$47,175			$50,894			$58,285			$43,738			$25,401
% of Total Assets		19.5	%		18.0	%		15.9	%		17.2	%		19.7	%		14.8	%		8.6	%
Base Case Down 200 bp
Cumulative Gap ($’s)		$58,096			$53,697			$47,964			$51,883			$59,164			$43,984			$25,401
% of Total Assets		19.6	%		18.1	%		16.2	%		17.5	%		20.0	%		14.9	%		8.6	%

The Company utilizes an income simulation model to measure interest rate risk and to manage interest rate sensitivity. The Company believes that income simulation modeling may enable the Company to better estimate the possible effects on net interest income due to changing market interest rates. Other key model parameters include: estimated prepayment rates on the Company’s loan, mortgage-backed securities and investment portfolios; savings decay rate assumptions; and the repayment terms and embedded options of the Company’s borrowings.

The following table presents the simulated impact of a 100 and 200 basis point upward or downward (parallel) shift in market interest rates on net interest income, return on average equity, return on average assets and the market value of portfolio equity at September 30, 2013. This analysis was done assuming that the interest-earning assets will average approximately $308 million and $341 million over a projected twelve and twenty-four month period, respectively, for the estimated impact on change in net interest income, return on average equity and return on average assets. The estimated changes in market value of equity were calculated using balance sheet levels at September 30, 2013. Actual future results could differ materially from our estimates primarily due to unknown future interest rate changes and the level of prepayments on our investment and loan portfolios and future FDIC regular and special assessments.

Analysis of Sensitivity to Changes in Market Interest Rates


	Twelve Month Forward Modeled Change in Market Interest Rates
	September 30, 2014					September 30, 2013
Estimated impact on:	-200	-100	0	+100	+200	-200	-100	0	+100	+200
Change in net interest income	-11.7%	-8.7%	-	16.3%	33.1%	-8.1%	-6.5%	-	14.6%	30.0%
Return on average equity	3.82%	4.14%	5.02%	6.62%	8.19%	3.01%	3.16%	3.76%	5.10%	6.49%
Return on average assets	0.38%	0.41%	0.48%	0.65%	0.82%	0.32%	0.33%	0.39%	0.53%	0.67%
Market value of equity (in thousands)						$34,575	$35,585	$36,290	$36,548	$36,174

The table below provides information about the Company’s anticipated transactions comprised of firm loan commitments and other commitments, including undisbursed letters and lines of credit, at September 30, 2013. The Company used no derivative financial instruments to hedge such anticipated transactions as of September 30, 2013.


Anticipated Transactions
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Undisbursed construction and land development loans
Fixed rate		$2,308
		5.23%

Adjustable rate		$1,419
		5.10%

Undisbursed lines of credit
Adjustable rate		$5,808
		3.74%

Loan origination commitments
Fixed rate		$ 235
		5.18%

Letters of credit
Adjustable rate		$ 454
		4.25%


		$10,224

In the ordinary course of its construction lending business, the Savings Bank enters into performance standby letters of credit. Typically, the standby letters of credit are issued on behalf of a builder to a third party to ensure the timely completion of a certain aspect of a construction project or land development. At September 30, 2013, the Savings Bank had four performance standby letters of credit outstanding totaling approximately $454 thousand. All four performance letters of credit are secured by developed property. The letters of credit will mature within twenty-one months. In the event that the obligor is unable to perform its obligations as specified in the applicable letter of credit agreement, the Savings Bank would be obligated to disburse funds up to the amount specified in the letter of credit agreement. The Savings Bank maintains adequate collateral that could be liquidated to fund these contingent obligations.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of September 30, 2013, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, on the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2013.

Disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports filed and submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal accounting officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) has occurred that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

(a)The Company is involved with various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes the outcome of these matters will have no material effect on the consolidated operations or consolidated financial condition of WVS Financial Corp.

(b)Not applicable.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

There are no material changes to the risk factors included in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) Not applicable.

(b) Not applicable.

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. Other Information

(a) Not applicable.

(b) Not applicable.

ITEM 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 10-Q, and this list includes the Exhibit Index.


Number	Description	Page
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer	E-1
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Accounting Officer	E-2
32.1	Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer	E-3
32.2	Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Accounting Officer	E-4
99	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	E-5
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	WVS FINANCIAL CORP.

November 14, 2013	BY:	/s/ David J. Bursic
Date		David J. Bursic President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

November 14, 2013	BY:	/s/ Keith A. Simpson
Date		Keith A. Simpson Vice-President, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)