XWELL, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-34785

FORM Holdings Corp.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code): (212) 309-7549

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x     No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x      No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter). ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes     ¨     No     x

As of August 7, 2017, 26,483,467 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

FORM Holdings Corp.

Table of Contents

Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FORM Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

FORM Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

FORM Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

FORM Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

FORM Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except for share and per share data)

Note 1. General

FORM Holdings Corp. (“FORM” or the “Company”) has three operating segments: wellness, technology and intellectual property.

The Company’s wellness operating segment consists of XpresSpa, which is a leading airport retailer of spa services. XpresSpa is a well-recognized airport spa brand with 52 locations, including 48 domestic and 4 international, as of June 30, 2017. XpresSpa offers travelers premium spa services, including massage, nail and hair as well as spa and travel products. The Company acquired XpresSpa in the fourth quarter of 2016.

The Company’s technology operating segment consists of Group Mobile as well as an 11% equity interest in InfoMedia Services Limited (“InfoMedia”). Group Mobile offers rugged hardware and software solutions, including laptops, tablets, and mobile printers, as well as installation and deployment services. The Company acquired Group Mobile in the fourth quarter of 2015 and Excalibur Integrated Systems Inc. (“Excalibur”), which was merged with Group Mobile, in the first quarter of 2017. The Company’s equity interest in InfoMedia increased from 8.25% to 11% in the first quarter of 2017 due to a realignment of ownership interests.

As further detailed in Note 10 “Discontinued Operations and Assets and Liabilities Held for Disposal,” during June 2017, the Company concluded that the requirement to report the results of FLI Charge as discontinued operations was triggered.

The Company is currently evaluating strategic alternatives with respect to Group Mobile in an attempt to enhance stockholder value. These strategic alternatives may include a possible sale, merger, spin-off or other separation of Group Mobile or other forms of business combinations or strategic transactions. The Company is seeking to enter into one or more strategic transactions involving Group Mobile in the first quarter of 2018.

The Company’s intellectual property operating segment is engaged in the monetization of patents related to content and ad delivery, remote monitoring and mobile technologies.

Note 2. Accounting and Reporting Policies

(a) Basis of presentation and principles of consolidation

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X, and should be read in conjunction with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. All adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation for the periods presented have been reflected by the Company. Such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The results of operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year or for any other interim period. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

(b) Use of estimates

The preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Actual results may differ from such estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the Company’s intangible assets, the useful lives of the Company’s intangible assets, the valuation of the Company’s derivative warrants, the valuation of stock-based compensation, deferred tax assets and liabilities, income tax uncertainties, and other contingencies.

(c) Revenue recognition

The Company recognizes revenue for the wellness operating segment from the sale of XpresSpa products and services at the point of sale, net of discounts and applicable sales taxes. Revenues from the XpresSpa wholesale and e-commerce businesses are recorded at the time goods are shipped. The Company excludes all sales taxes assessed to its customers. Sales taxes assessed on revenues are included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets until remitted to the state agencies.

The Company records revenue from product sales in the technology operating segment when title and risk of loss are passed to the customer, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement for sale, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company’s shipping terms typically specify F.O.B. destination, at which time title and risk of loss have passed to the customer. At the time of sale of hardware products, the Company records an estimate for sales returns and allowances based on historical experience. Hardware products sold by the Company are warranted by the vendor.

The Company has drop-shipment arrangements with many of its hardware vendors and suppliers to deliver products directly to customers. Revenue for drop-shipment arrangements is recorded on a gross basis upon delivery to the customer with contract terms that typically specify F.O.B. destination. Revenue is recognized on a gross basis, as the Company is the principal in the transaction, as the primary obligor in the arrangement, assumes the inventory risk if the product is returned by the customer, sets the price of the product to the customer, assumes credit risk for the amounts invoiced, and works closely with the customers to determine their hardware specifications.

Freight billed to customers is recognized as net product revenue and the related freight costs as a cost of sales.

On certain occasions, the Company’s technology operating segment will enter into a bill and hold arrangement with a customer. When this occurs, the Company makes a determination as to when it will be the proper time to recognize revenue. In doing so, the Company takes the following into consideration:

For multiple-element arrangements in the Company’s technology operating segment that include hardware products, services and maintenance, the Company allocates revenue to all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. In such circumstances, the Company uses a hierarchy to determine the selling price to be used for allocating revenue to deliverables: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”) and (iii) best estimate of selling price (“ESP”). VSOE generally exists only when the Company sells the deliverable separately and is the price actually charged by the Company for that deliverable. ESPs reflect the Company’s best estimates of what the selling prices of elements would be if they were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. The Company allocates revenue to all deliverables based on the VSOE of each element, and if VSOE does not exist revenue is recognized when elements lacking VSOE are delivered.

Revenue from patent licensing is recognized if collectability is reasonably assured, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable and delivery of the service has been rendered. Currently, revenue arrangements related to intellectual property provide for the payment of contractually determined fees and other consideration for the grant of certain intellectual property rights related to the Company’s patents. These rights typically include some combination of the following: (i) the grant of a non-exclusive, retroactive and future license to manufacture and/or sell products covered by patents, (ii) the release of the licensee from certain claims, and (iii) the dismissal of any pending litigation. The intellectual property rights granted typically extend until the expiration of the related patents. Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, the Company has no further obligation with respect to the grant of the non-exclusive retroactive and future licenses, covenants-not-to-sue, releases, and other deliverables, including no express or implied obligation on the Company’s part to maintain or upgrade the related technology, or provide future support or services. Generally, the agreements provide for the grant of the licenses, covenants-not-to-sue, releases, and other significant deliverables upon execution of the agreement, or upon receipt of the upfront payment. As such, the earnings process is complete and revenue is recognized upon the execution of the agreement, upon receipt of the upfront fee, and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

(d) Cost of sales

Cost of sales for the Company’s wellness operating segment consists of store-level costs. Store-level costs include all costs that are directly attributable to the store operations and include:

Cost of sales for the Company’s technology operating segment includes costs to acquire or manufacture goods for inventory.

Cost of sales for the Company’s intellectual property operating segment mainly includes expenses incurred in connection with the Company’s patent licensing and enforcement activities, patent-related legal expenses paid to external patent counsel (including contingent legal fees), licensing and enforcement related research, consulting and other expenses paid to third parties, as well as related internal payroll expenses.

(e) Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01 (“ASU 2017-01”) “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” ASU 2017-01 provides guidance to evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. If substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single asset or a group of similar assets, the assets acquired (or disposed of) are not considered a business. The Company adopted ASU 2017-01 as of January 1, 2017 on a prospective basis.

(f) Recent issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted

ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04 (“ASU 2017-04”) “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” ASU 2017-04 eliminates step two of the goodwill impairment test and specifies that goodwill impairment should be measured by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. Additionally, the amount of goodwill allocated to each reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount of net assets should be disclosed. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted. The Company currently anticipates that the adoption of ASU 2017-04 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2017-09, Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting

In May 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-09 (“ASU 2017-09”) “Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting.” ASU 2017-09 provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The current disclosure requirements in Topic 718 apply regardless of whether an entity is required to apply modification accounting under the amendments in this update. ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017; early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the potential impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

(g) Reclassification

Certain balances have been reclassified to conform to presentation requirements, including presentation of discontinued operations and assets and liabilities held for disposal with respect to the Company’s FLI Charge business (refer to Note 10), as well as consistent presentation of cost of sales and general and administrative expenses to align presentation for operating segments.

Note 3. Net Loss per Share of Common Stock

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock plus dilutive potential common stock considered outstanding during the period. However, as the Company generated a net loss in all periods presented, some potentially dilutive securities, including certain warrants and stock options, were not reflected in diluted net loss per share because the impact of such instruments was anti-dilutive.

The table below presents the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock:

Note 4. Business Combinations

XpresSpa

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company learned new information about legal and other professional costs which existed as of the acquisition date of XpresSpa. As a result, the Company and the sellers of XpresSpa (the “XpresSpa Sellers”) agreed to reduce the total amount of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (“FORM Preferred Stock”), which was previously issued to the XpresSpa Sellers in conjunction with the acquisition of XpresSpa. The Company reduced the number of the FORM Preferred Stock by 16,219 shares and estimated that the fair value of the reduction of the consideration was $908, which was recorded as a reduction of preferred equity and goodwill.

Additionally, during the three months ended June 30, 2017, certain XpresSpa Sellers converted 45,260 shares of their FORM Preferred Stock into 362,077 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share.

As a result of these events, the total number of shares of FORM Preferred Stock was reduced from 491,427 as of December 31, 2016 to 429,948 shares as of June 30, 2017 and the face value (and liquidation preference) was reduced from $23,588 to $20,638.

Group Mobile

On February 2, 2017, the Company acquired Excalibur, which is an end-to-end solutions provider of mobile hardware devices, wireless network security, data networking, telephony and mobile application development and software solutions. Following the acquisition, Excalibur was merged with Group Mobile within the Company’s technology operating segment.

In consideration for the acquisition, the Company issued 888,573 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, to the former stockholders of Excalibur (the “Excalibur Sellers”). In addition, the Excalibur Sellers will, in the three years following the closing of this transaction, also receive $500 for each $2,000 of gross profit generated by a specified list of Excalibur accounts annually, until such cumulative gross profit reaches $6,000, and an additional $500 when such cumulative profit reaches $10,000, such amounts are payable in either cash or the Company’s common stock, at the election of the Company.

The fair value of the total purchase price is $2,125 and includes a fair value of contingent consideration of $316 and fair value of unregistered shares of common stock issued of $1,809.

Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The purchase price for the acquisition was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets based on their fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible assets and intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The table below presents preliminary allocation of the purchase price:

The allocation of the purchase price was based upon a preliminary valuation performed using the Company's estimates and assumptions, which are subject to change within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date).

Note 5. Segment Information

The Company’s operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is regularly evaluated by the enterprise’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company concluded that it conducts its business through three operating segments, which are also its reportable segments:

Segment operating results reflect losses before corporate and unallocated shared expenses, interest expense and income taxes. Corporate and unallocated shared expenses principally consist of costs for corporate functions, rent for office space, stock-based compensation, executive management and certain unallocated administrative support functions.

General and administrative costs are allocated among the operating segments and non-operating corporate segment. The non-operating corporate segment does not have any revenue, but does incur expenses such as compensation expenses, rent and infrastructure costs. The non-operating corporate segment’s assets are mainly comprised of cash.

The Company currently operates in two geographical regions: United States and all other countries. The following table represents the geographical revenue, regional operating loss, and total asset information as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. There were no concentrations of geographical revenue, regional operating loss or total assets related to any single foreign country that were material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 6. Fair Value Measurements

Derivative Warrant Liabilities

The following table presents the placement in the fair value hierarchy of derivate warrant liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

The Company measures its derivative warrant liabilities at fair value. The May 2015 Warrants were classified within Level 3 because they were valued using the Black-Scholes-Merton model, which utilizes significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. These derivative warrant liabilities were initially measured at fair value and are marked to market at each balance sheet date.

In addition to the above, the Company’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consisted of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and Debt. The carrying amounts of all the aforementioned financial instruments approximate fair value because of the short-term maturities of these instruments.

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s derivative warrant liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017:

Valuation processes for Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurement of the derivative warrant liabilities falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value measurements are evaluated by management to ensure that changes are consistent with expectations of management based upon the sensitivity and nature of the inputs.

June 30, 2017:

December 31, 2016:

Sensitivity of Level 3 measurements to changes in significant unobservable inputs

The inputs to estimate the fair value of the Company’s derivative warrant liabilities were the current market price of the Company’s common stock, the exercise price of the derivative warrant liabilities, their remaining expected term, the volatility of the Company’s common stock price and the risk-free interest rate over the expected term. Significant changes in any of those inputs in isolation can result in a significant change in the fair value measurement.

Generally, an increase in the market price of the Company’s shares of common stock, an increase in the volatility of the Company’s shares of common stock, and an increase in the remaining term of the derivative warrant liabilities would each result in a directionally similar change in the estimated fair value of the Company’s derivative warrant liabilities. Such changes would increase the associated liability while decreases in these assumptions would decrease the associated liability. An increase in the risk-free interest rate or a decrease in the differential between the derivative warrant liabilities’ exercise price and the market price of the Company’s shares of common stock would result in a decrease in the estimated fair value measurement and thus a decrease in the associated liability. The Company has not, and does not plan to, declare dividends on its common stock and, as such, there is no change in the estimated fair value of the derivative warrant liabilities due to the dividend assumption.

Other Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents the placement in the fair value hierarchy of shares of the contingent consideration assumed by the Company following the acquisition of Excalibur, which is measured at fair value on a recurring basis, and the decrease in shares of FORM Preferred Stock issued to the XpresSpa Sellers, which was measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of April 4, 2017 (the “Valuation Date”):

The purchase value of the contingent consideration assumed by the Company following the acquisition of Excalibur and the fair value of the decrease in shares of FORM Preferred Stock issued to the XpresSpa Sellers were determined using the Monte-Carlo simulation and, as such, were classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value measurements are evaluated by management to ensure that changes are consistent with expectations of management based upon the sensitivity and nature of the inputs.

Valuation processes for Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

To estimate the fair value of the decrease in shares of FORM Preferred Stock, the Monte-Carlo simulation was performed using the following variables:

Additionally, the Monte-Carlo simulation used the value of the underlying equity value issued to XpresSpa Sellers on the date of the XpresSpa acquisition, December 23, 2016, which is comprised of the aggregation of the fair value of the shares of the Company’s common stock, shares of FORM Preferred Stock and warrants.

Note 7. Stock-based Compensation

As of June 30, 2017, 1,258,603 shares of the Company’s common stock were available for future grants under the Company’s 2012 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan. Total stock-based compensation expense for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $1,473 and $962, respectively. Total stock-based compensation expense for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $732 and $499, respectively.

The following table illustrates the options granted during the six-month period ended June 30, 2017.

The following table illustrates the RSUs granted during the six-month period June 30, 2017.

The activity related to stock options and RSUs during the six-month period ended June 30, 2017 consisted of the following:

On January 20, 2017, the Company entered into amended employment agreements with its named executive officers. Under the terms of certain of these agreements, certain of these officers are entitled to a percentage of the amount equal to the total amount of cash and the fair market value of all noncash consideration paid or payable to the Company or its stockholders in connection with an initial public offering or a change of control of certain subsidiaries of the Company. The amended employment agreements also allow for the granting of equity awards to certain officers in connection with an initial public offering of certain subsidiaries of the Company.

The Company did not recognize tax benefits related to its stock-based compensation as there is a full valuation allowance recorded.

Note 8. Income Taxes

The Company’s provision for income taxes consists of federal, state, local, and foreign taxes in amounts necessary to align the Company’s year-to-date provision for income taxes with the effective tax rate that the Company expects to achieve for the full year. Each quarter, the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate and records cumulative adjustments as deemed necessary. The income tax provisions for the six months ended June 30, 2017 reflect an estimated global annual effective tax rate of approximately -3.96% from continuing operations. Discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017 reflect an annual effective tax rate of 0.58%.

As of June 30, 2017, deferred tax assets generated from the Company’s U.S. activities were offset by a valuation allowance because realization depends on generating future taxable income, which, in the Company’s estimation, is not more likely than not to be generated before such net operating loss carryforwards expire. The Company expects its effective tax rate for its current fiscal year to be significantly lower than the statutory rate as a result of a full valuation allowance; therefore, any loss before income taxes does not generate a corresponding income tax benefit.

Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2017 of approximately $227 was attributable primarily to tax deductions related to goodwill, for which there is no corresponding financial statement amortization expense, partially offset by the reduction in the valuation allowance needed following the acquisition of Excalibur's deferred tax liability. The final annual tax rate cannot be determined until the end of the fiscal year; therefore, the actual tax rate could differ from current estimates. Although the Company has an immaterial amount of uncertain tax positions, the Company does not expect to record any additional material provisions for unrecognized tax benefits with the next year.

Note 9. Related Parties Transactions

On April 22, 2015, XpresSpa entered into a credit agreement and secured promissory note (the “Debt”) with Rockmore Investment Master Fund Ltd. (“Rockmore”) that was amended on August 8, 2016. Rockmore is an investment entity controlled by the Company’s board member, Bruce T. Bernstein. The Debt had an outstanding balance of $6,500 as of both June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, which is included in long-term liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, XpresSpa paid $430 of interest and recorded $365 of interest expense. During May 2017, per the original agreement and with Rockmore’s consent, the Company elected to extend the maturity date of the Debt from May 1, 2018 to May 1, 2019. No other material terms of the Debt were modified.

In addition, the Company paid $212 to Mr. Bernstein in March 2017 for the legal costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition of XpresSpa and certain legal proceedings related to litigation with Amiral Holdings SAS (“Amiral”) prior to the completion of such acquisition, as Mr. Bernstein was indemnified by XpresSpa and was a defendant in the Amiral legal proceedings. These costs are included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016.

Note 10. Discontinued Operations and Assets and Liabilities Held For Disposal

During June 2017, the Company concluded that the requirement to report the results of FLI Charge, a wholly-owned subsidiary included in its technology operating segment, as discontinued operations was triggered. The Company is currently negotiating the terms of an agreement to sell FLI Charge to a third-party investor in exchange for a minority investment in the form of shares of preferred stock in the newly created entity, which will own and operate FLI Charge. The Company will not be providing any continued management or financing support to FLI Charge. The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2017. In connection with this agreement, a non-cash impairment loss of $1,092 relating to FLI Charge’s technology assets and goodwill was recorded as of June 30, 2017. The following table represents the components of operating results from discontinued operations, as presented in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss:

In addition, the following table presents the carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities held for sale as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, as presented in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation and legal proceedings

Certain of the Company’s outstanding legal matters include speculative claims for substantial or indeterminate amounts of damages. The Company regularly evaluates developments in its legal matters that could affect the amount of any potential liability and makes adjustments as appropriate. Significant judgment is required to determine both the likelihood of there being a liability and the estimated amount of a loss related to such matters.

With respect to the Company’s outstanding legal matters, based on its current knowledge, the Company’s management believes that the amount or range of a potential loss will not, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, the outcome of such legal matters is inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties. The Company evaluated the matters described below, and assessed the probability and likelihood of the occurrence of liability. Based on management’s estimates, the Company recorded $650, which is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2017.

The Company expenses legal fees in the period in which they are incurred.

Cordial

Effective October 2014, XpresSpa terminated its former Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (“ACDBE”) partner, Cordial Endeavor Concessions of Atlanta, LLC (“Cordial”), in several store locations at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport.

On January 3, 2017, XpresSpa filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York against Cordial and several related parties. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent inducement, fraudulent concealment, tortious interference, and breach of good faith and fair dealing related to XpresSpa’s former partnership with Cordial as XpresSpa’s ACDBE partner in several store locations at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (the “Cordial Litigation”). On March 3, 2017, XpresSpa filed a first amended complaint against Cordial. On April 5, 2017, Cordial filed a motion to dismiss the Cordial Litigation.

On January 4, 2017, XpresSpa filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against its former attorney, Kevin Ross, and his law firm, alleging malpractice, unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent inducement, fraudulent concealment, tortious interference, and promissory estoppel related to XpresSpa’s former partnership with Cordial, as well as XpresSpa’s engagement of Kevin Ross as its attorney (the “Ross Litigation”). On March 17, 2017, XpresSpa filed a First Amended Complaint against the defendants. On June 2, 2017, the Ross Defendants filed their answer.

Both the Cordial Litigation and Ross Litigation are pending before the respective courts.

In re Chen et al.

On March 16, 2015, four former employees of XpresSpa who worked at locations in John F. Kennedy International Airport and LaGuardia Airport filed a putative class and collective action wage-hour litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, claiming that they and other spa technicians were misclassified, and that overtime was unpaid. On September 23, 2016, the Court conditionally certified the class. The parties held a mediation on February 28, 2017 and reached an agreement on a settlement in principle. The parties are in the process of finalizing a formal settlement agreement, and preparing a motion to the Court for preliminary approval of a classwide settlement.

Other

XpresSpa is involved in various other claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these actions will have a material adverse effect on XpresSpa’s financial position, results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. However, a significant increase in the number of these claims, or one or more successful claims under which the Company incurs greater liabilities than the Company currently anticipates, could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The Company’s intellectual property operating segment is engaged in litigation, for which no liability is recorded, as the Company does not expect a material negative outcome.

Note 12. Subsequent Events

On July 26, 2017, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Roth Capital Partners, LLC, acting as the representative of the several underwriters named therein (collectively, the “Underwriters”), relating to the issuance and sale (the “Offering”) of 6,900,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“FORM Common Stock”) including 900,000 shares subject to the Underwriters’ over-allotment option, which was exercised on August 2, 2017 and closed on August 4, 2017. The price to the public in the Offering was $1.10 per share and the Underwriters agreed to purchase the shares of FORM Common Stock from the Company pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement at a purchase price of $1.023 per share. The net proceeds to the Company from the Offering were approximately $6,700 after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The statements contained herein that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are often identified by the use of words such as, but not limited to, “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continues,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “will be,” “plans,” “projects,” “seeks,” “should,” “targets,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions or variations intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management based on information currently available to management. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed on March 30, 2017 (the “2016 Annual Report”) and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and any future reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The forward-looking statements set forth herein speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements, except as required by law.

All references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “we,” “us” and “our” refer to FORM Holdings Corp. (prior to May 5, 2016, known as “Vringo, Inc.”), a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Overview

FORM Holdings Corp. (“FORM” or the “Company”) has three operating segments: wellness, technology and intellectual property.

Our wellness operating segment consists of XpresSpa, which is a leading airport retailer of spa services. XpresSpa is a well-recognized airport spa brand with 52 locations, including 48 domestic and 4 international, as of June 30, 2017. XpresSpa offers travelers premium spa services, including massage, nail and hair as well as spa and travel products. We acquired XpresSpa in the fourth quarter of 2016.

Our technology operating segment consists of Group Mobile as well as an 11% equity interest in InfoMedia Services Limited (“InfoMedia”). Group Mobile offers rugged hardware and software solutions, including laptops, tablets, and mobile printers, as well as installation and deployment services. In the first quarter 2017, we completed the acquisition of Excalibur Integrated Systems, Inc. (“Excalibur”) which is an end-to-end solutions provider of mobile hardware devices, wireless network security, data networking, telephony and mobile application development and software solutions. Following the acquisition, Excalibur was merged with Group Mobile within our technology operating segment. Our equity interest in InfoMedia, which is accounted for under the cost method of investment, increased from 8.25% to 11% in the first quarter of 2017 due to a realignment of ownership interests.

As of June 30, 2017, our FLI Charge business is reflected as discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss and assets held for disposal and liabilities held for disposal in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as a result of an offer from a third party to finance its ongoing operations.

We are currently evaluating strategic alternatives with respect to Group Mobile in an attempt to enhance stockholder value. These strategic alternatives may include a possible sale, merger, spin-off or other separation of Group Mobile or other forms of business combinations or strategic transactions. We are seeking to enter into one or more strategic transactions involving Group Mobile in the first quarter of 2018.

Our intellectual property operating segment is engaged in the monetization of patents related to content and ad delivery, remote monitoring and mobile technologies.

Subsequent to June 30, 2017, we completed a public offering of 6,900,000 shares of our common stock, at $1.10 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $6.7 million.

Second Quarter 2017 Highlights

We use GAAP and non-GAAP measurements to assess the trends in our business. With respect to XpresSpa, we review XpresSpa’s Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, which we define as earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization expense, excluding one-time costs (e.g., merger and acquisition and integration related costs) and stock-based compensation.

Adjusted EBITDA has been presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is a supplemental measure of financial performance that is not required by, or presented in accordance with, GAAP. We consider Adjusted EBITDA to be an important indicator for the performance of our business, but not a measure of performance or liquidity calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We have included this non-GAAP financial measure because management utilizes this information for assessing our performance and liquidity, and as an indicator of our ability to make capital expenditures and finance working capital requirements. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is a measurement that is commonly used by analysts and some investors in evaluating the performance and liquidity of companies such as us. In particular, we believe that it is useful for analysts and investors to understand this relationship because it excludes transactions not related to our core cash operating activities. We believe that excluding these transactions allows investors to meaningfully analyze the performance of our core cash operations. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as an alternative to operating income or as an indicator of operating performance or any other measure of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. In evaluating our performance as measured by Adjusted EBITDA, we recognize and consider the limitations of this measurement. Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our obligations for the payment of income taxes, interest expense, or other obligations such as capital expenditures. Accordingly, Adjusted EBITDA is only one of the measurements that management utilizes.

The following table provides a reconciliation of operating loss from continuing operations for our three operating segments and corporate to Adjusted EBITDA income (loss) for the three months ended June 30, 2017:

Our operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is regularly evaluated by the enterprise’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. We concluded that we conduct our business through three operating segments, which are also our reportable segments: wellness, technology and intellectual property.

Segment operating results reflect losses before corporate and unallocated shared expenses, interest expense, income taxes and noncontrolling interests.

Wellness

Our wellness operating segment recognized revenue of $12,927,000 during the second quarter of 2017, which was generated by XpresSpa for services provided and health and beauty products sold. We acquired XpresSpa on December 23, 2016 and are actively integrating its corporate functions and optimizing the operating segment’s performance. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, we opened three new flagship locations, consisting of one location at John F. Kennedy International Airport’s Terminal 4 and two locations at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. We also closed two small temporary kiosks to better align our resources. During the second quarter of 2017, we also started a major renovation to another location in John F. Kennedy International Airport’s Terminal 4; this renovation is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2017. A number of our stores will be undergoing maintenance or renovations during the third quarter of 2017. Wherever possible, we seek to receive lease extensions or other concessions when we undergo these processes. As of June 30, 2017, we operated a total of 52 XpresSpa locations.

Store-level costs include all costs that are directly attributable to the store operations and include:

General and administrative costs include insurance, infrastructure, payroll and benefits, inventory planning, marketing and other costs. Also included in general and administrative costs are expenses related to the integration of XpresSpa as well as office consolidation and moving costs, which amounted to $310,000 during the second quarter of 2017.

Depreciation and amortization costs include the depreciation of leasehold improvements and equipment and the amortization of the brand and customer relationship intangible assets, which were recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date.

Technology

Our technology operating segment predominantly includes revenues and cost of sales generated by Group Mobile and Excalibur. During the second quarter of 2017, Group Mobile’s revenue increased 40.8% from $2,450,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 to $3,450,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2017, respectively. This was mainly due to the increased sales pipeline throughout 2016 and early 2017.

Intellectual Property

The intellectual property operating segment includes revenues from one-time patent licenses as well as expenses incurred in connection with our patent licensing and related internal payroll expenses.

Corporate

Corporate and unallocated shared expenses principally consist of costs for corporate functions, rent for office space, stock-based compensation, executive management and certain unallocated administrative support functions.

Discontinued Operations

During June 2017, we concluded that the requirement to report the results of FLI Charge, a wholly-owned subsidiary included in our technology operating segment, as discontinued operations was triggered. We are currently negotiating the terms of an agreement to sell FLI Charge to a third-party investor in exchange for a minority investment in the form of shares of preferred stock in the newly created entity which will own and operate FLI Charge. We will not be providing any continued management or financing support to FLI Charge. The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2017. In connection with this agreement, a non-cash impairment loss of $1,092,000 relating to FLI Charge’s technology assets and goodwill was recorded as of June 30, 2017. The results of operations for FLI Charge are presented on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss as consolidated net loss from discontinued operations, which totaled $1,552,000 and $2,113,000 for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017, respectively. In addition, the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities belonging to FLI Charge are presented on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as assets held for disposal and liabilities held for disposal, respectively.

Results of Operations

Three-month period ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2016

Revenue

During the three-month period ended June 30, 2017, we recorded total revenue of $16,377,000, which represents an increase of $5,027,000 (or 44.3%) compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2016. XpresSpa generated $12,927,000 of revenue in the second quarter of 2017. Our technology operating segment demonstrated 40.8% growth in quarterly revenues from $2,450,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 to $3,450,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2017.

During the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, our intellectual property operating segment recognized a one-time lump sum payment of $8,900,000 in connection with an executed confidential license agreement. 

Cost of sales

During the three-month period ended June 30, 2017, we recorded total cost of sales of $13,209,000, which represents an increase of $6,786,000 (or 105.7%) compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2016. XpresSpa recorded total cost of sales of $10,401,000, which represent direct costs incurred for store operations. As result, our wellness operating segment’s gross profit for the quarter was 19.6%. Our technology operating segment recorded $2,690,000 of cost of sales, which is driven by the increase in sales during the quarter. As a result, our technology operating segment generated 22.0% gross margin during the quarter.  

During the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, our intellectual property costs were $4,243,000, which include legal and consulting costs related to the confidential license agreement reached during the quarter and royalty expenses to a previous owner of some of our patents. These costs decreased to $118,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2017.

As a percentage of total revenue, cost of sales were 80.7% in the second quarter of 2017 compared to 56.6% in the second quarter of 2016, which is driven by the direct cost of sales generated by XpresSpa.

We expect our cost of sales will grow over time as our revenues increase. We expect that total cost of sales as a percentage of sales will decline gradually over time as a result of the improvement of store-level performance by our wellness operating segment and as our technology operating segment implements new offerings.

Depreciation, amortization and impairment