Youngevity International, Inc. - Annual Report: 2019 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X]
|
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
|
OR
[ ]
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from_______ to______
|
Commission file number 000-54900
YOUNGEVITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
90-0890517
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
2400 Boswell Road,
|
|
|
Chula Vista, CA
|
|
91914
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
619-934-3980
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Title of each class
|
|
Trading Symbol(s)
|
|
Name of each exchange on which
registered–
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
9.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock,
$0.001 par value
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [
] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
[ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to submit such files). Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a
smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer, “accelerated
filer” “smaller reporting company” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated filer [X]
|
Non-accelerated filer [ ]
|
Smaller reporting company [X]
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company [ ]
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standard
provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [
]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on
and attestation to its management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting
under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b))
by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued
its audit report. [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of Act). Yes [ ] No
[X]
The aggregate market value of all of the common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 28, 2019, the last
business day of the registrant's recently completed
second quarter, was $83,002,648 based
upon $5.70, the closing stock price reported on the Nasdaq Capital
Market on that date.
The number of shares of registrant's common stock outstanding
on June 22, 2021 was
33,975,126.
Documents incorporated by reference: None.
YOUNGEVITY INTERNATIONAL,
INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
||
17
|
||
43
|
||
43
|
||
44
|
||
44
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
45
|
||
46
|
||
46
|
||
64
|
||
64
|
||
65
|
||
65
|
||
67
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
||
72
|
||
76
|
||
78
|
||
83
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
84
|
||
84
|
||
|
|
|
90
|
YOUNGEVITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019
PART I
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”)
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), that involve substantial risks and
uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are contained
principally in Part I, Item 1. “Business,” Part I, Item
1A. “Risk Factors,” and Part II, Item 7.
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations,” but are also contained
elsewhere in this Annual Report. Forward looking-statements can be
identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking
language, such as the words “plans,”
“intends,” “believes,”
“expects,” “anticipates,”
“estimates,” “projects,”
“potential,” “may,” “will,”
“would,” “could,” “should,”
“seeks,” or “scheduled to,” or other
similar words, the negative of these terms, other variations of
these terms or comparable language, or by discussion of strategy or
intentions. These statements are based on management’s
current beliefs, expectations, and assumptions and are subject to a
number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to
predict and generally beyond our control, that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those expressed, projected or
implied in or by the forward-looking statements. These risks and
uncertainties should be considered carefully, and readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements. As such, no assurance can be given that the future
results covered by the forward-looking statements will be achieved.
All information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is as of
December 31, 2019, unless otherwise indicated. The Company does not
intend to update this information to reflect events after the date
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
You should refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” section of
this Annual Report for a discussion of important factors that may
cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by our forward-looking statements. As a result of these
factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements
in this Annual Report will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, if
our forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the
inaccuracy may be material. In light of the significant
uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not
regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or
any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in
any specified time frame, or at all. We do not undertake any
obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to
“we,” “us,” “our,” and
“Youngevity,” refer to Youngevity International, Inc.
and its subsidiaries.
Summary Risk Factors
The following is a summary of the key risks relating to the
Company. A more detailed description of each of the risks as well
as other risks can be found below in Item 1A. Risk
Factors.
RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS
●
There is substantial
risk about our ability to continue as a going concern, which may
hinder our ability to obtain future
financing;
●
We have a history of
losses and there are no assurances we will report profitable
operations in future periods;
●
We are dependent upon access to external sources of capital to grow
our business;
●
Our failure to comply with the terms of our outstanding Notes has
resulted in a default under the terms of certain of the notes and,
if uncured, it could potentially result in action against our
pledged assets;
●
We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over
financial reporting, until the
material weaknesses are remediated, and our associated disclosure
controls and procedures improve, there is a risk that a material
error could occur and not be detected;
●
Our inability to file timely and accurate periodic reports has
caused us to incur significant additional costs and may continue to
affect our stock price and our ability to meet listing requirements
going forward.
●
We cannot assure you that our common stock and preferred stock will
regain listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market;
●
We face risks related to the intended restatement of our previously
issued financial statements for the fiscal quarters ended March 31,
2019, June 30, 2019, and September 30, 2019, and being further
delayed in complying with our Securities & Exchange Commission
reporting obligations if we are unable to resume a timely filing
schedule;
●
Our business is difficult to evaluate because we have recently
expanded our business segments, product offerings and customer
base;
●
We generate a substantial portion of our revenue from the sale of
The Beyond Tangy Tangerine line, Osteo-fx line and, Ultimate EFA
line of products. A decrease in sales of these products could
seriously harm our business;
●
The impact of the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak, or similar global
health concerns, could negatively impact our ability to source
certain products, impact product pricing, impact our
customers’ ability or that of our licensee to obtain
financing or have a negative impact on our business;
●
We face significant competition;
●
We may become involved in the future in legal proceedings that, if
adversely adjudicated or settled, could adversely affect our
financial results;
●
The loss of key management personnel could adversely affect our
business;
●
The inability to obtain adequate supplies of raw materials for
products at favorable prices, or at all, or the inability to obtain
certain products from third-party suppliers or from our
manufacturers, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, or results of
operations;
●
A failure of our information technology systems would harm our
business; and
●
Our
business is subject to online security risks, including security
breaches.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR DIRECT SELLING BUSINESS
●
Independent distributor activities that violate laws could result
in governmental actions against us and could otherwise harm our
business;
●
Network marketing is heavily regulated and subject to government
scrutiny and regulation;
●
Our principal business
segment is conducted worldwide in one channel, direct selling and
therefore any negative perceptive of direct
selling would greatly impact our sales;
●
As a network marketing
company, we are dependent upon an independent sales force and we do
not have direct control over the marketing of our
products;
●
The loss of a significant Youngevity distributor could adversely
affect our business; and
●
Nutritional
supplement products may be supported by only limited availability
of conclusive clinical studies.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMERCIAL COFFEE BUSINESS
●
Increases in the cost of high-quality arabica coffee beans or other
commodities or decreases in the availability of high-quality
arabica coffee beans or other commodities could have an adverse
impact on our business and financial results;
●
Adverse public or medical opinions about the health effects of
consuming our products, as well as reports of incidents involving
food-borne illnesses, food tampering, or food contamination,
whether or not accurate, could harm our business;
●
Because our green coffee operations are concentrated within
Nicaragua, we are subject to greater risks than if our green coffee
business was internationally diversified;
●
We are dependent upon H&H Coffee Group Export Corp., our
largest customer of our green coffee mill processing services for
the year ended December 31, 2019, and Hernandez, Hernandez Export Y
Compania Limitada to supply and assign unprocessed green coffee to
our mill for processing, as well as the provision of management
services to our Nicaraguan subsidiary;
●
Interruptions in our supply chain of green coffee or changes in our
relationships with our vendors could adversely affect our gross
margins, expenses, and results of operations; and
●
A
significant portion of our commercial coffee segment revenue and
purchases for the year ended December 31, 2019, has been generated
from sales from few customers and for the year ended December 31,
2018, has been generated from sales from a few customers and
suppliers.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMERCIAL HEMP BUSINESS
●
New
legislation or regulations which impose substantial new regulatory
requirements on the manufacture, packaging, labeling, advertising
and distribution and sale of hemp-derived products could harm our
business, results of operations, financial condition and
prospects.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INVESTING IN OUR COMPANY AND OUR
SECURITIES
●
Our Series D preferred
stock is subordinate to our existing and future debt, and interests
of the Series D preferred stock could be diluted by the issuance of
additional preferred shares and by other
transactions;
●
We could be prevented from paying cash dividends on the Series D
preferred stock due to prescribed legal requirements;
●
Our two principal stockholders who are
also our Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and director and our
Chief Operating Officer have significant influence over
us;
●
Our stock has historically had a limited market. If an active
trading market for our common stock does develop, trading prices
may be volatile; and
●
The requirements of being a public company, including compliance
with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
and the Dodd-Frank Act, have strained our resources and increased
our costs, and we may continue to be unable to comply with these
requirements in a timely or cost-effective manner; and
●
Our
stock price has been volatile and subject to various market
conditions.
Overview
Youngevity, formerly AL International, Inc., founded in 1996,
operates in three segments: (i) the direct selling segment where
products are offered through a global distribution network of
preferred customers and distributors, (ii) the commercial coffee
segment where products are sold directly to businesses and (iii)
the commercial hemp segment where we manufacture proprietary
systems to provide end-to-end extraction and processing that allow
for the conversion of hemp feed stock into hemp oil and hemp
extracts. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we operated in
two business segments, our direct selling segment, and our
commercial coffee segment. During the first quarter of 2019,
through the acquisition of the assets
of Khrysos Global, Inc. we added the commercial hemp as a third
business segment to our operations as further discussed
below.
Information on the operations of our three segments is as
follows:
●
Our direct
selling segment is operated through three domestic subsidiaries, AL
Global Corporation, 2400 Boswell LLC, and Youngevity Global LLC,
and twelve foreign subsidiaries; Youngevity Australia Pty. Ltd.,
Youngevity NZ, Ltd., Youngevity Mexico S.A. de CV, Youngevity
Russia, LLC, Youngevity Israel, Ltd., Youngevity Europe SIA
(Latvia), Youngevity Colombia S.A.S, Youngevity International
Singapore Pte. Ltd., Mialisia Canada, Inc., Youngevity Global LLC,
Taiwan Branch, Youngevity Global LLC, Philippine Branch and
Youngevity International (Hong Kong). We also operate in Indonesia,
Malaysia, and Japan through our sales force of independent
distributors.
|
●
Our commercial coffee segment is operated through CLR
Roasters, LLC (“CLR”) and
its wholly-owned subsidiary, Siles Plantation Family Group S.A.
(“Siles”).
●
Our commercial hemp segment is operated through our subsidiaries,
Khrysos Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(“KII”), which acquired the assets of Khrysos Global
Inc., a Florida corporation, (“Khrysos Global”) in
February 2019 and its wholly-owned subsidiaries of Khrysos Global,
INXL Laboratories, Inc., a Florida corporation (“INXL”)
and INX Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation
(“INXH”).
Non-reliance of Previously Issued Financial Statements
On October 16, 2020 the Company filed a notice of non-reliance on
previously issued financial statements with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”), reporting the
Company’s Audit Committee determined that the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended
March 31, 2019, June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019 contained in
the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q previously filed
with the SEC on May 20, 2019, August
14, 2019 and November 18, 2019 should no longer be relied upon.
Similarly, related press releases, earnings releases, and investor
communications describing the Company’s unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for those periods should no
longer be relied upon. As a result, the Company intends to file a
restatement related to these periods as soon as practicable. The
intended restatements are related to the Company’s commercial
coffee segment and the commercial hemp segment, further details are
summarized below:
Commercial Coffee Segment
During the Company’s 2019 annual audit, the Company reviewed
revenues related to CLR, specifically the 2019 green coffee sales
program, for sales made by the Company to its joint venture
partner, H&H Coffee Group Export Corp. (“H&H
Export”) and for sales recorded to major independent
customers. These sales were originally recorded at gross (revenue
recorded without reduction for cost to purchase the
inventory).
As part of the review, the Company assessed whether the 2019 green
coffee sales to H&H Export depicted the transfer of promised
goods or services to H&H Export in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in
exchange for those goods or services. For sales made to major
independent customers, the Company assessed whether revenue was
recognizable.
For both reviews, the following five steps were applied to review
if the core revenue recognition principles were meet:
●
Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer
●
Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the
contract
●
Step 3: Determine the transaction price
●
Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance
obligations in the contract
●
Step 5: Recognize revenue when the company satisfies a performance
obligation
During this review process the Company focused on identifying the
performance obligations in the contracts with H&H Export. The
Company’s review indicated that per the underlying terms and
conditions of the contracts entered into with H&H Export, (the
provider of the “wet” green coffee and the buyer of the
processed coffee), that CLR is assigned the green coffee beans as
coffee is delivered to its mill processing facility. Assignment of
the coffee is defined as taking of physical possession of the green
coffee for the purpose of processing the green coffee. Under the
assignment CLR is responsible for insuring all reasonable and
necessary actions to ensure the coffee beans are safeguarded during
processing at the Company’s coffee mill. CLR does not take
ownership and does not incur financial risk associated with the
coffee as it is delivered to its mill. Based on the above
assessment, management has concluded that CLR does not control the
green coffee before it is provided to H&H Export, at the point
of sale to H&H Export.
Management has determined that when CLR provides the processed
green coffee to H&H export, the goods or services provided to
H&H Export is the performance obligation to provide milling
services for the green coffee. As such, the Company is the agent
for the milling services.
Management has also determined that since the Company does not
control the green coffee beans at the point of delivery to the
mill, and that legal title to the green coffee beans is transferred
momentarily, before the green coffee beans are sold back to H&H
Export, that the Company is therefore an agent in sales
transactions of green coffee beans to H&H Export.
Therefore, management has determined that for green coffee sales
made by the Company to its joint venture partner, H&H Export,
the Company should have recorded these sales at net of costs to
purchase inventory, which reflects the value of the performance
obligation to provide milling services. For the year ended December
31, 2019, the Company is reporting its revenue for coffee when sold
to H&H Export at net.
With regard to sales made to major independent customers, the
Company focused on if recognition of revenue thresholds were met
and if the company had satisfied its performance obligation and
could reasonably expect payment for fulling these performance
obligations. The Company determined that for certain sales to major
customers, these thresholds were not met, and therefore revenue
should not have been recognized.
The Company intends to restate its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 2019, three and six months
ended June 30, 2019, and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2019 related to this change in revenue recognition.
(See Note 3 under “Other Related Party
Transactions” for further
discussion related to H&H Export.).
Commercial Hemp Segment
In conjunction with the Company’s 2019 annual audit the
Company concluded that certain fixed assets acquired in the
acquisition of KII and the share price valuation for the common
stock issued as consideration were not fairly valued as of the
closing date February 12, 2019 which resulted in a decrease to the
net assets acquired including; a) $1,127,000 related to the certain
fixed assets, and b) $1,351,000 related to a change in the fair
value of common stock issuance resulting in an increase to goodwill
of $2,478,000 acquired and an adjusted aggregate purchase price of
$15,894,000. The Company intends to restate its quarterly reports
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2019, three and
six months ended June 30, 2019, and for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2019. (See Note 2 under “Khrysos Global, Inc.” for further discussion regarding this
acquisition.)
Segment Information
The direct selling segment develops and distributes health and
wellness products through its global independent direct selling
network also known as multi-level marketing. The commercial coffee
segment is engaged in coffee roasting and distribution,
specializing in gourmet coffee and the sale and processing of green
coffee beans. The commercial hemp segment manufactures proprietary
systems to provide end-to-end extraction and processing that allow
for the conversion of hemp feed stock into hemp oil and hemp
extracts.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we derived approximately
86.1% of our revenue from our direct sales, approximately 13.3% of
our revenue from our commercial coffee sales and approximately 0.6%
from the commercial hemp segment. During the year ended December
31, 2018, we derived approximately 85.5% of our revenue from our
direct sales and approximately 14.5% of our revenue from our
commercial coffee sales.
Direct Selling Segment. In the
direct selling segment, we sell health and wellness, beauty product
and skin care, scrap booking and story booking items, packaged food
products and other service-based products on a global basis and
more recently our Hemp FX™ hemp-derived cannabinoid
(“CBD”) product line and offer a wide range of products
through an international direct selling network. Our direct sales
are made through our network, which is a web-based global network
of customers and distributors. Our independent sales force markets
a variety of products to an array of customers, through
friend-to-friend marketing and social networking. We consider our
Company to be an e-commerce company whereby personal interaction is
provided to customers by our independent sales network. Initially,
our focus was solely on the sale of products in the health, beauty,
and home care market through our marketing network; however, we
have since expanded our selling efforts to include a variety of
other products in other markets. Our direct selling segment offers
approximately 5,500 products to support a healthy lifestyle
including:
● Nutritional Supplements
|
|
● Skincare and Cosmetics
|
|
● Home and Garden
|
● Weight Management
|
|
● Nail and Beauty
|
|
● Pet Care
|
● Health and Wellness
|
|
● Gourmet Coffee
|
|
● Digital Products
|
● Lifestyle Products
|
|
● Packaged Foods
|
|
● Telecare Health Services
|
● Apparel and Accessories
|
|
● Hemp-derived CBD
Products
|
|
● Business Lending
|
Since 2012, we have expanded our operations through a series of
acquisitions of the assets and equity of 24 direct selling
companies including their product lines and sales forces. We have
also substantially expanded our distributor base by merging the
assets that we have acquired under our web-based independent
distributor network, as well as providing our distributors with
additional new products to add to their product
offerings.
Commercial Coffee Segment. In the commercial
coffee segment, we engage in the commercial sale of roasted coffee
products and distribution of green coffee beans, through CLR, our
wholly-owned subsidiary which was established in 2001.
During the year ended December 31,
2019, we derived approximately 5.4% of our coffee revenue from our
green coffee sales, 32.8% from our milling and processing services
and approximately 61.8% of our coffee revenue from our roasted
coffee sales.
We own a traditional coffee roasting business that sells roasted
coffee products under its own Café La Rica brand,
Josie’s Java House brand, Javalution brands, and Café
Cachita. CLR produces and sells a variety of private labels through
major national sales outlets and to major customers including
cruise lines and office coffee service operators, as well as through
our direct selling business. CLR produces and markets a unique line
of coffees with health benefits under the JavaFit® brand which
is sold directly to consumers. In April 2017, CLR
reached an agreement with Major League Baseball's Miami Marlins to
feature CLR’s Café La Rica Gourmet Espresso coffee as
the “Official Cafecito of the Miami Marlins” at Marlins
Park in Miami, Florida. The current agreement with the Miami Marlins is
through the 2021 baseball season. In January 2019, CLR
acquired the Café Cachita brand of espresso and in February
2019 we announced the expansion of our Café Cachita brand of
espresso into retail stores throughout Southeastern Grocers.
The new distribution footprint now includes all Winn Dixie, Bi-Lo,
Fresco Y Mas, Save Mart, and Harveys stores. In June 2019, we
announced all-store distribution for CLR’s Javalution™
Hemp Infused Coffee Brand, with orders shipping on the east coast
to Save Mart during the end of the first quarter of 2020 and
continue to ship orders to Save Mart throughout 2020 and now
2021.
Our roasting facility located in Miami, Florida, is 50,000 square
feet and is SQF Level 2 certified, which is a stringent food safety
process that verifies the coffee bean processing plant and
distribution facility is in compliance with Certified HACCP (Hazard
Analysis, Critical Control Points) food safety plans.
In March 2014, we expanded our commercial coffee segment and
started our new green coffee distribution business with CLR’s
acquisition of Siles, located in Matagalpa, Nicaragua. Siles
includes “La Pita,” a dry-processing facility on
approximately 26 acres of land and “El Paraiso,” a
coffee plantation consisting of approximately 500 acres of land and
thousands of coffee plants which produces 100 percent Arabica
coffee beans that are shade grown, Organic, Rainforest Alliance
Certified™ and Fair Trade Certified™. The plantation
and dry-processing facility allow CLR to control the coffee
production process from field-to-cup. The dry-processing plant
allows CLR to produce and sell green coffee to major coffee
suppliers in the United States (the “U.S.”) and around
the world.
As part of the 2014 Siles acquisition, CLR engaged the owners of
H&H Coffee Group Export Corp. (“H&H Export”)
and Hernandez, Hernandez, Export Y Compania Limitada
(“H&H”), Alain Piedra Hernandez (“Mr.
Hernandez”) and Marisol Del Carmen Siles Orozco (“Ms.
Orozco”), as employees to manage Siles and entered into an
operating agreement with them that provides for the sharing of
profits and losses generated by Siles after certain conditions are
met. CLR has made improvements to the land and facilities since
2014. Additionally, CLR has contracted with H&H who is an agent
of the local producers in Nicaragua to supply unprocessed green
coffee, to our mill. We do not grow the green coffee that we
process and sell and instead the green coffee that we process and
sell originates with local producers in Nicaragua. We do not have a
direct relationship with the local producers and are dependent on
H&H, who serves as an agent and assigns the unprocessed green
coffee beans acquired from local producers to our mill, insuring
that our mill has a supply of raw green coffee on a timely and
efficient manner. During the year ended December 31, 2019, all of
the unprocessed green coffee processed through our mill was
assigned from H&H.
CLR acquires processed green coffee beans from H&H Export, who
releases the processed green coffee beans and invoices CLR for
those processed green coffee beans as CLR sells processed green
coffee to major coffee suppliers in the U.S. and around the world.
CLR, from time to time will also supply H&H Export with milling
services that ultimately provide H&H Export with processed
green coffee. As CLR does not control the green coffee prior to
transferring control to H&H Export, these transactions are
recognized as milling services. The goods or services provided to
H&H Export for these transactions is the performance obligation
to provide milling services for the green coffee.
In
January 2019, to accommodate CLR’s green coffee purchase
contract, CLR entered into an
agreement with H&H, H&H Export, Mr. Hernandez and Ms.
Orozco, collectively referred to as (the “Nicaraguan
Partner”), pursuant to which the Nicaraguan Partner agreed to
transfer a 45-acre tract of land in Matagalpa, Nicaragua (the
“Matagalpa Property”) to be owned 50% by the Nicaraguan Partner
and 50% by CLR. In consideration for the land acquisition we issued
to H&H Export, 153,846 shares of our common stock. The fair
value of the shares issued was $1,200,000 and was based on the
stock price on the date of issuance of the shares. In addition, the
Nicaraguan Partner and CLR agreed to contribute $4,700,000 each
toward construction of a processing plant, office, and storage
facilities on the Matagalpa Property (collectively the
“Matagalpa Mill”) for processing coffee in Nicaragua.
The addition of the Matagalpa Mill will accommodate CLR’s
green coffee contract commitments. For the year ended December 31,
2019 and 2018, CLR made payments of $2,150,000 and $900,000,
respectively, towards the Matagalpa Mill project. At December 31,
2019, CLR contributed a total of $3,050,000 towards the Matagalpa
Mill project, in addition $391,117 was paid for operating equipment
and the Nicaraguan Partner contributed a total of $1,922,000.
CLR’s remaining portion of $1,650,000 was paid during 2020,
including an additional $912,606 related to operating equipment. As
of the date of this filing, the Matagalpa Mill is in construction
and was not ready for full operations.
Commercial Hemp Segment. In the
commercial hemp segment, we are a manufacturer of commercial
hemp-based CBD extraction and post-processing equipment, and
end-to-end processor of CBD isolate, distillate, water soluble
isolate and water-soluble distillate. We develop, manufacture, and
sell equipment and related services to customers which enable them
to extract CBD oils from hemp stock. We provide hemp growers,
feedstock suppliers, and CBD crude oil producers the use of
equipment, intellectual capital, production consultancy, tolling
services, and wholesale CBD channel sales capabilities. We are also
engaged in hemp-based CBD extraction technology including tolling
processing which converts hemp biomass to hemp extracts such as CBD
oil, distillate, and isolate. We offer customers turnkey
manufacturing solutions in extraction services and end-to-end
processing systems. In addition, we own a laboratory testing
facility that provides us with a broad range of capabilities in
regard to formulation, quality control, and testing standards with
our CBD products, including potency analysis for our supply
partners of hemp derived CBD products.
Acquisitions
Direct Selling Segment. We have
expanded our operations through a series of acquisitions of the
assets of other direct selling companies including their product
lines and sales forces. We have also substantially expanded our
distributor base by merging the assets that we have acquired under
our web-based independent distributor network, as well as providing
our distributors with additional new products to add to their
product offerings.
Set
forth below is information regarding each of our direct selling
segment acquisitions during 2019 and 2018.
BeneYOU, LLC. In November 2019,
we acquired certain assets of BeneYOU, LLC.,
(“BeneYOU”). BeneYOU is a nutritional and beauty
product company that brings customers and distributors of Jamberry,
Avisae and M.Global. BeneYOU’s, flagship brand Jamberry has
an extensive line of nail products with a core competency in social
selling whereas Avisae focuses on the gut health, and M.Global
delivers hydration products. We are obligated to make monthly
payments based on a percentage of the BeneYOU’s distributor revenue
derived from sales of our products and a percentage of royalty
revenue derived from sales of BeneYOU’s products until the
earlier of the date that is five years from the closing date or
such time as we have paid to BeneYOU aggregate cash payments of the
BeneYOU distributor revenue and royalty revenue equal to a
predetermined maximum aggregate purchase price. (See Note 2
to the consolidated financial statements.)
Doctor’s Wellness Solutions Global LP (ViaViente).
In March 2018, we acquired
certain assets of Doctor’s
Wellness Solutions Global LP (“ViaViente”).
ViaViente is the distributor of The ViaViente
Miracle, a highly concentrated,
energizing whole fruit puree blend that is rich in antioxidants and
naturally occurring vitamins and minerals. We are obligated to make monthly payments based on
a percentage of the ViaViente distributor revenue derived
from sales of our products and a percentage of royalty revenue
derived from sales of ViaViente’s products until the earlier
of the date that is five years from the closing date or such time
as the we have paid to ViaViente aggregate cash payments of the
ViaViente distributor revenue and royalty revenue equal to a
predetermined maximum aggregate purchase price. (See Note 2
to the consolidated financial statements.)
Nature Direct. In February 2018, we acquired certain assets
and assumed certain liabilities of
Nature Direct. Nature Direct, is a manufacturer and distributor of
essential oil based nontoxic cleaning and care products for
personal, home and professional use. We are obligated to make monthly payments based on
a percentage of the Nature
Direct distributor revenue derived from sales of our products
and a percentage of royalty revenue derived from sales of
the Nature Direct products until the earlier of the date
that is twelve years from the closing date or such time as we have
paid to Nature Direct aggregate cash payments of
the Nature Direct distributor revenue and royalty revenue
equal to a predetermined maximum aggregate purchase price.
(See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.)
Set forth below is information regarding each of our direct selling
segment acquisitions since 2012.
Business
|
|
Date of
Acquisition
|
|
Product Categories
|
BeneYOU,
LLC
|
|
November
1, 2019
|
|
Nutritional
supplements and beauty products
|
ViaViente
|
|
March
1, 2018
|
|
Nutritional
supplements
|
Nature
Direct
|
|
February
12, 2018
|
|
Essential oil based
nontoxic cleaning and care products for personal, home and
professional use
|
BeautiControl,
Inc.
|
|
December
13, 2017
|
|
Cosmetic and skin
care products
|
Future
Global Vision, Inc.
|
|
November
6, 2017
|
|
Nutritional
supplements and automotive fuel additive
products
|
Sorvana
International, LLC
(FreeLife
International, Inc.)
|
|
July 1,
2017
|
|
Health
and wellness products
|
Ricolife,
LLC
|
|
March
1, 2017
|
|
Teas
|
Bellavita
Group, LLC
|
|
March
1, 2017
|
|
Health
and beauty products
|
Legacy
for Life, LLC
|
|
September
1, 2016
|
|
Nutritional
supplements
|
Nature’s
Pearl Corporation
|
|
September
1, 2016
|
|
Nutritional
supplements and skin care products
|
Renew
Interest, LLC (SOZO Global, Inc.)
|
|
July
29, 2016
|
|
Nutritional
supplements and skin care products
|
South
Hill Designs Inc.
|
|
January
20, 2016
|
|
Jewelry
|
PAWS
Group, LLC
|
|
July 1,
2015
|
|
Pet
treats
|
Mialisia
& Co., LLC
|
|
June 1,
2015
|
|
Jewelry
|
JD
Premium LLC
|
|
March
4, 2015
|
|
Dietary
supplement company
|
Sta-Natural,
LLC
|
|
February
23, 2015
|
|
Vitamins, minerals
and supplements for families and their pets
|
Restart
Your Life, LLC
|
|
October
1, 2014
|
|
Dietary
supplements
|
Beyond
Organics, LLC
|
|
May 1,
2014
|
|
Organic
food and beverages
|
Good
Herbs, Inc.
|
|
April
28, 2014
|
|
Herbal
supplements
|
Biometics
International, Inc.
|
|
November
19, 2013
|
|
Liquid
supplements
|
GoFoods
Global, LLC
|
|
October
1, 2013
|
|
Packaged
foods
|
Heritage
Markers, LLC
|
|
August
14, 2013
|
|
Digital
products
|
Livinity,
Inc.
|
|
July
10, 2012
|
|
Nutritional
products
|
GLIE,
LLC (DBA True2Life)
|
|
March
20, 2012
|
|
Nutritional
supplements
|
Commercial Hemp Segment. In
February 2019, KII, our wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired
substantially all the assets of Khrysos Global and all the
outstanding equity of INXL and INXH. The collective business
manufactures
proprietary systems to provide end-to-end extraction and processing
that allow for the conversion of hemp feed stock into hemp oil and
hemp extracts. KII offers various
rental, sales, and service programs of their extraction and
processing systems. (See Note 2 & Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements.)
Products and Services
We employ certain web enabled systems to increase distributor
support, which allows distributors to run their business more
efficiently and allows us to improve our order-processing accuracy.
In many countries, distributors can utilize the internet to manage
their business electronically, including order submission, order
tracking, payment, and two-way communications. In addition,
distributors can further build their own business through
personalized web pages provided by us, enabling them to sell a
complete line of our products online. Self-paced online training is
also available in certain markets, as well as up-to-the-minute
news, about us.
In the U.S. and selected other markets, we also market our products
through the following consumer websites:
●
|
www.youngevity.com
|
●
|
www.beneyou.com
|
●
|
www.ygyi.com
|
●
|
www.clrroasters.com
|
●
|
www.heritagemakers.com
|
●
|
www.javalution.com
|
●
|
www.hempfx.com
|
●
|
www.khrysosglobal.com
|
Information contained on our websites are not incorporated by
reference into, and do not form any part of, this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. We have included the website address as a factual
reference and do not intend it to be an active link to the
website.
Direct Selling Segment. We
offer approximately 5,500 products to support a healthy lifestyle.
All of these products, which are sold through our direct selling
network, can be categorized into eight verticals: (i) Health &
Nutrition, (ii) Home & Family, (iii) Food & Beverage, (iv)
Spa & Beauty, (v) Fashion, (vi) Essential Oils, (vii) Photo,
and (viii) Services.
Our flagship health & nutrition line of products include our
Healthy Body Start Pak™, which includes Beyond Tangy
Tangerine® (a multivitamin/mineral/amino acid supplement),
Ultimate EFA Plus™ (an essential fatty acid supplement),
Beyond Osteofx™ (a bone and joint health supplement), and the
line of products from our acquisition of BeneYOU in November 2019.
This product category is continually evaluated and updated where
and when necessary. New products are introduced to take advantage
of new opportunities that may become available based on scientific
research and or marketing trends. Beyond Tangy Tangerine® 2.0
was added to the line to offer a second flavor and a non-GMO option
to our number one selling product. The Healthy Body Start
Pak™ comes in a variety of options to target specific health
concerns or goals. In addition, we offer many other products under
our health & nutrition line.
In
2018, we introduced our Hemp FX™ hemp-derived CBD product
line which is included with our Health and Nutrition line of
products. We currently offer seven products in this line, each
containing a proprietary blend of hemp-derived CBD oil, herbs,
minerals, and antioxidants. All products under the Hemp FXTM line
contain oil derived from hemp containing less than 0.3% THC on a
dry weight basis at the point of extraction. The products are
manufactured domestically and sold by our distributors in the 48
states that have not prohibited sales of products containing CBD.
See the risk factor “New legislation or regulations which
impose substantial new regulatory requirements on the manufacture,
packaging, labeling, advertising and distribution and sale of
hemp-derived products could harm our business, results of
operations, financial condition and prospects” for a
discussion regarding certain risks specific to these
products.
Our home and family line of products include our For Tails
Only™ line of pet products, Nature Direct product line of
environmentally safe products for the home, Hydrowash™ an
environmentally safe cleaner, Bloomin Minerals™, a line of
plant and soil revitalizers, scrape booking products for the family
through our Memories for Life brand of products and many other
products for the home and family.
Our food & beverage line of products include nutrient rich
energy drinks, probiotic chocolates, and organic gourmet coffee. We
offer through our direct selling our CLR brands of coffee. Our
flagship weight management program is marketed as the
Healthy Body
Challenge, a program that
involves three phases: detoxification, transformation, and the
healthy lifestyle phase. Each phase includes recommended products.
During the transformation phase, we recommend the Ketogenic 30-Day
Burst, consisting of the Slender FX™ Keto products to support
fat loss. In addition, we offer
many other products for the food & beverage
line.
Our spa & beauty line of
products offered through our Youngevity® Mineral
Makeup™, Soul Purpose, Beyond Organic, Simple Corp, Jamberry,
and other brands which include makeup & nail products, skin
& hair care products for both women and men, bath products. In
addition, we offer many other products for our spa & beauty
line of products.
Our fashion line of products includes our MK Collaboration line of
fashion and jewelry accessories to complement our nutritional and
makeup products. With the acquisition of BeneYOU in November 2019,
Mialisia in 2015, and the licensing agreement we entered into with
South Hill Designs (a proprietary jewelry company that sells
customized lockets and charms) in 2016, we have further expanded
our jewelry line and our distributors have access to offering more
variety and appealing to a broader consumer base.
Our essential oils line of products includes our own Youngevity
formulas. We offer a unique line of essential oil blends including
bath salts.
Our photo line of products includes our Heritage Makers line which
allows customers and distributors to create and publish a number of
products utilizing their personal photos, Our Memories For Life
products for scrapbooking and memory keepsake and Anthology DIY by
Lisa Bearnson, a creative new approach to start to finish
do-it-yourself projects. Heritage Makers provides ongoing access to
Studio, a user friendly, online program, where a person can make
one of a kind keepsake; storybooks, photo gifts and more, using
Heritage Makers rich library of digital art and product templates.
Products available include storybooks, digital scrapbooking, cards,
and photo gifts.
Our services are offered through David Allen Capital and include
business lending, telecare health services, discount services for
travel and entertainment and various other service type
products.
Commercial Coffee Segment. CLR
operates a traditional coffee roasting business which includes the
JavaFit® product line which is available to our network of
direct marketers. Javalution, through its JavaFit Brand, develops
products in the relatively new category of fortified coffee.
JavaFit fortified coffee is a blend of roasted ground coffee and
various nutrients and supplements.
Our JavaFit line of coffee is only sold through our direct selling
network. CLR produces and sells coffee under its own brands, as
well as under a variety of private labels through major national
retailers, various office coffee and convenience store
distributors, to wellness and retirement centers, to a number of
cruise lines and cruise line distributors, and direct to the
consumer through sales of the JavaFit Brand to our direct selling
division.
In addition, CLR produces coffee under several company owned brands
including: Café La Rica, Café Alma, Josie’s Java
House, Javalution Urban Grind, Javalution Daily Grind, and
Javalution Royal Roast. These brands are sold to various internet
and traditional brick and mortar retailers including WalMart®,
WinnDixie, Jetro, American Grocers, Publix, Home Goods, Marshalls,
Bi-Lo, Fresco Y Mas, Harveys, Save Mart and T.J.
Maxx®.
During 2015 CLR invested in the KCup® coffee equipment and
capabilities and began the production of the KCup® line of
single-serve coffee products. In addition, we registered our own
YCup® trademark for Youngevity identification to expand the
business brand name.
In April 2017, CLR reached an agreement with Major League
Baseball's Miami Marlins to feature CLR’s Café La Rica
Gourmet Espresso coffee as the “Official Cafecito of the
Miami Marlins” at Marlins Park in Miami, Florida.
The current agreement with the Miami
Marlins, which was recently renewed, is through the 2021 baseball
season. In January 2019, CLR acquired the Café Cachita
brand of espresso and in February 2019 we announced the expansion
of our Café Cachita brand of espresso into retail stores
throughout Southeastern Grocers.
CLR’s green coffee business provides for the sale of green
coffee beans to other importer and distributors who sell to the
roasters of coffee beans from Nicaragua and providing milling
services to H&H.
Our CLR products offered include:
●
|
100%
Colombian Premium Blend
|
●
|
Italian
Espresso
|
●
|
House
Blend
|
●
|
Decaffeinated
Coffee
|
●
|
Dark
Roast
|
●
|
Halfcaff 50/50
blend Espresso
|
●
|
Flavored
Coffees
|
●
|
Green
Coffee Beans
|
●
|
Espresso
|
●
|
Organic
Coffees
|
●
|
Hemp
Derived Cannabidiol Coffee
|
●
|
Select
Water Decaffeinated
|
Commercial Hemp Segment. Our
commercial hemp segment is a provider of hemp-based CBD oil,
isolate and distillate and offers a variety of products and
services. We manufacture hemp-based CBD extraction equipment and
CBD oil refiners and provide end-to-end processing of oil from hemp
biomass. In addition, we offer proprietary system rentals and
leases to provide extraction services, including post processing,
and laboratory testing services with capabilities regarding
formulation, quality control, genetic seed development, cloning,
and testing standards with our CBD products. We also produce
tinctures, balms, bath bombs, creams, ointments, in various
potencies, as well as Javalution™ Hemp Infused Coffee Brand
CBD coffee for CLR.
Distribution
Direct Selling Segment. We
presently sell products domestically in 50 states and
internationally, with operations in the U.S. and currently fourteen
international distribution centers. For the years ended December
31, 2019 and 2018 approximately 14% of our revenue were derived
from sales outside the U.S. We primarily sell our products to the
ultimate consumer through the direct selling channel. Our
distributors are required to pay a onetime enrollment fee and
receive a welcome kit specific to that country region that consists
of forms, policy and procedures, selling aids, and access to our
distributor website, prior to commencing services for us as a
distributor. Distributors are independent contractors and not our
employees. Distributors earn a profit by purchasing products
directly from us at a discount from a published brochure price and
selling them to their customers, the ultimate consumer of our
products. We generally have no arrangements with end users of our
products beyond the distributors, except as described
below.
A distributor may contact customers directly, selling primarily
through our online or printed brochures, which highlight new
products and special promotions for each of our sales campaigns. In
this sense, the distributor, together with the brochure, is the
“store” through which our products are sold. A brochure
introducing new sales campaigns is frequently produced and our
websites and social networking activity take place on a continuous
basis. Generally, distributors and customers forward orders using
the internet, mail, telephone, or fax and payments are processed
via credit card or other acceptable forms of payment at the time an
order is placed. Orders are processed, and the products are
assembled primarily at our distribution center in Chula Vista,
California and delivered to distributors, distribution centers and
customers through a variety of local, national and international
delivery companies.
Introducing new distributors and the training of the new
distributors are the primary responsibilities of key independent
distributors supported by our marketing home office staff. The
independent distributors are independent contractors compensated
exclusively based on total sales of products achieved by their
down-line distributors and customers. Although the independent
distributors are not paid a fee for recruiting or introducing
additional distributors, they have the incentive to recruit and
onboard additional distributors to increase their opportunities for
increasing their total product sales and related sales commissions.
Acquisitions of other direct selling businesses and personal
contacts, including recommendations from current distributors, and
local market advertising constitute the primary means of obtaining
new distributors and customers. Distributors also can earn bonuses
based on the net sales of products made by distributors they have
recruited and trained in addition to discounts earned on their own
sales of our products. This program can be unlimited based on the
level achieved in accordance with the compensation plan that can
change from time to time at our discretion. The primary
responsibilities of sales leaders are the prospecting, appointing,
training and development of their down-line distributors and
customers while maintaining a certain level of their own
sales.
Commercial Coffee Segment. Our coffee segment is operated by CLR. The segment
operates a coffee roasting plant and distribution facility located
in Miami, Florida. The 50,000-square foot plant contains two
commercial grade roasters and four commercial grade grinders
capable of roasting 10 million pounds of coffee annually. The plant
contains a variety of packaging equipment capable of producing
two-ounce fractional packs, vacuum sealed brick packaging for
espresso, various bag packaging configurations ranging from eight
ounces up to a five-pound bag package. The coffee segment’s
single-serve K-Cup filling equipment can produce 35 million K-Cups
annually of our own brands and private label
orders.
Commercial Hemp Segment. Our commercial hemp segment, located in central
Florida, includes an 82,000 square foot hemp processing and
manufacturing facility in Orlando, Florida, to house its processing
hemp derived products and finished goods manufacturing facility.
The Orlando facility holds the post processing equipment and the
extensive power systems. In addition to the Orlando facility, KII
owns a laboratory testing facility located in Clermont,
Florida, that provides capabilities in regard to
formulation, quality control, and testing standards with CBD
products. In addition, KII owns
a production shop located in Mascotte, Florida. In 2021, KII
shifted its focus back to its primary
core business of extraction of cannabinoids and the production of
products for sale with the cannabinoids. As a result, currently the
Clermont, Florida property is for sale. The Mascotte, Florida property is expected to be
listed for sale by the end of 2021. KII, expects to continue to
lease the Orlando, Florida. (See Note 2 & Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements.)
Seasonality and Back Orders
Our business in both the direct selling and commercial coffee
segment can experience weaker sales during the summer months;
however, based on recent experience, seasonality has not been
material to our operating results. Our business in the
commercial hemp segment has not experienced effects of seasonality
in its operating results, however due to the price fluctuations of
biomass the hemp segment can experience fluctuations in costs of
sales. We have not experienced significant back orders in any of
our segments.
Promotion and Marketing
Direct Selling Segment. Sales promotion and sales development activities
are directed at assisting distributors through sales aids such as
brochures, product samples, demonstration product videos and live
training sessions. To support the efforts of distributors to reach
new customers, specially designed sales aids, promotional pieces,
customer flyers, radio and print advertising are used. In addition,
we seek to motivate our distributors using special incentive
programs that reward superior sales performance. Periodic sales
meetings with our independent distributors are conducted by our
home office staff. The meetings are designed to keep distributors
abreast of product line changes, explain sales techniques and
provide recognition for sales performance.
Several merchandising techniques are used, including the
introduction of new products, the use of combination offers, the
use of trial sizes and samples, and the promotion of products
packaged as gift items. In general, for each sales campaign, a
distinctive brochure or flyer is published, in which new products
are introduced and selected items are offered as special promotions
or are given prominence in the brochure. A key current priority for
our merchandising is to continue the use of pricing and promotional
models to enable a deeper, fact-based understanding of the role and
impact of pricing within our product portfolio.
Commercial Coffee Segment. Sales promotion and sales development primarily
take place via the CLR in-house team. CLR works diligently to be
sure that CLR is invited to participate in the request-for-proposal
process that comes up each year on major coffee contracts. CLR's
in-house sales team consists of five people that devote the
majority of their time to obtaining new business. CLR has
established a direct store distribution route that it utilizes to
market, promote and ship its Café La Rica and Josie’s
Java House brands. Various promotion strategies and advertisements
in retail circulars are utilized to support the brands being
marketed through the direct store distribution
route.
The versatility of the plant supports a diverse customer base. The
coffee segment is a large supplier to the hospitality market with a
great focus prior to the COVID-19 pandemic on serving the cruise
line industry. A major revenue producing area is the private label
market where the Company produces coffee for various retailer owned
private brands. The segment supplies coffee and equipment to
retirement communities, services the office coffee service segment,
and markets through distributors to the convenient store market;
CLR also markets its own brands of coffee to various retailers. Our
CLR owned brands that are currently on retail shelves includes
Café La Rica and the Josie’s Java House of
brands.
The
commercial coffee segment also includes our green coffee business.
CLR is engaged in coffee roasting and distribution, specializing in
gourmet coffee and the sale of processed green coffee beans and
providing mill processing services of unprocessed green coffee
beans. CLR is supplied with unprocessed green coffee beans direct
from the plantation in Nicaragua, Central America and the nearby
farms, extracts green coffee beans from the procured coffee
cherries through the process of drying in the sun or the process of
pulping, fermentation, washing and drying of the coffee beans and
sells processed coffee beans to other coffee distributors. With the
addition of the Nicaragua plantation and dry-processing facility we
have further expanded our coffee segment with the ability to
process green coffee not only for our own use but also provide this
service to other coffee growers. CLR also purchases green
coffee beans from our non-Nicaragua sources as
well.
Commercial Hemp Segment. Sales
promotion and sales development for hemp-related products and
services primarily take place via in-house sales teams. The
in-house sales teams are divided into three groups that primarily
promote products and services at various regional and national
trade shows as well as through potential clients provided by sales
representatives.
Suppliers
Direct Selling Segment. We purchase raw materials from numerous domestic
and international suppliers. To achieve certain economies of scale,
best pricing and uniform quality, we rely primarily on a few
principal suppliers. Other than the coffee products produced
through CLR, all our products are manufactured by independent
suppliers.
Sufficient raw materials were available during the year ended
December 31, 2019 and we believe they will continue to be. We
monitor the financial condition of certain suppliers, their ability
to supply our needs, and the market conditions for these raw
materials. We believe we will be able to negotiate similar market
terms with alternative suppliers if needed. Though with the impact
of COVID-19, subsequent to 2019 as result of the pandemic we have
experienced a decline in availability of products and associated
time delays from our suppliers.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the direct selling segment
made purchases from two vendors, Global Health Labs, Inc. and
Michael Schaeffer, LLC, that individually comprised more than 10%
of total segment purchases and in aggregate approximated 41% of
total segment purchases. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the
direct selling segment made purchases from two vendors, Global
Health Labs, Inc. and Purity Supplements, that individually
comprised more than 10% of total segment purchases and in aggregate
approximated 41% of total segment purchases.
Commercial Coffee Segment. We primarily obtain green coffee from Nicaragua.
We primarily utilize H&H as an outside broker to supply our
mill with unprocessed green coffee. H&H is the outside brokers
that provides the largest supply of our unprocessed green coffee.
For large contracts, CLR works to negotiate a price lock with its
suppliers to protect CLR and its customers from price fluctuations
that take place in the commodities market.
We also produce green coffee from CLR’s own plantation it
acquired in Nicaragua in 2014. We do not believe that CLR is
substantially dependent upon nor exposed to any significant
concentration risk related to purchases from any single vendor,
given the availability of alternative sources from which we may
purchase inventory. The supply and price of coffee are subject to
high volatility. Supply and price of all coffee grades are affected
by multiple factors, such as weather, pest damage, politics,
competitive pressures, the relative value of the U.S. currency and
economics in the producing countries. To achieve certain
economies of scale, best pricing and uniform quality, we rely
primarily on a few principal suppliers, namely, Rothfos Corporation
and H&H.
For
the year ended December 31, 2019, the commercial coffee segment
made purchases of green coffee beans from four vendors, INTL FC
Stone Merchant Services, Rothfos Corporation, Sixto Packaging and
the Serengeti Trading Co., that individually comprised more than
10% of total segment purchases and in aggregate approximated 73% of
our total segment purchases. For the year ended December 31, 2018,
the commercial coffee segment made purchases of processed green
coffee beans from two vendors, H&H and Rothfos Corporation,
which individually comprised more than 10% of total segment
purchases and in aggregate approximated 83% of total segment
purchases.
Commercial Hemp Segment. We
purchase raw materials from numerous domestic suppliers to produce
hemp-CBD oil, isolate and distillate as well as to manufacture hemp
extraction equipment. To achieve certain economies of scale, best
pricing, and uniform quality, we rely primarily on a few principal
suppliers.
For the year ended December 31, 2019 the commercial hemp segment
made purchases from two vendors, BioProcessing Corp. Ltd. and
Xtraction Services, Inc., that individually comprised more than 10%
of total segment purchases and in aggregate approximated 47% of
total segment purchases.
Intellectual Property
We have developed, and we use registered trademarks in our
business, particularly relating to our corporate and product names.
We own several trademarks that are registered with the U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office and we also own trademarks in Canada,
Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Mexico, and Russia. Registration
of a trademark enables the registered owner of the mark to bar the
unauthorized use of the registered trademark in connection with a
similar product in the same channels of trade by any third-party in
the respective country of registration, regardless of whether the
registered owner has ever used the trademark in the area where the
unauthorized use occurs.
We also claim ownership and protection of certain product names,
unregistered trademarks, and service marks under common law. Common
law trademark rights do not provide the same level of protection
that is afforded by the registration of a trademark. In addition,
common law trademark rights are limited to the geographic area in
which the trademark is used. We believe these trademarks, whether
registered or claimed under common law, constitute valuable assets,
adding to recognition of our brands and the effective marketing of
our products. We intend to maintain and keep current all our
trademark registrations and to pay all applicable renewal fees as
they become due. The right of a trademark owner to use its
trademarks, however, is based on a number of factors, including
their first use in commerce, and trademark owners can lose
trademark rights despite trademark registration and payment of
renewal fees. We therefore believe that these proprietary rights
have been and will continue to be important in enabling us to
compete, and if for any reason we were unable to maintain our
trademarks, our sales of the related products bearing such
trademarks could be materially and negatively affected. See
“Risk Factors”.
We own certain intellectual property, including trade secrets that
we seek to protect, in part, through confidentiality agreements
with employees and other parties. Most of our products are not
protected by patents and therefore such agreements are often our
only form of protection. Even where these agreements
exist, there can be no assurance that these agreements will not be
breached, that we will have adequate remedies for any breach, or
that our trade secrets will not otherwise become known to or
independently developed by competitors. Our proprietary product
formulations are generally considered trade secrets but are not
otherwise protected under intellectual property laws.
We intend to protect our legal rights concerning intellectual
property by all appropriate legal action. Consequently, we may
become involved from time to time in litigation to determine the
enforceability, scope, and validity of any of the foregoing
proprietary rights. Any patent litigation could result in
substantial cost and divert the efforts of management and technical
personnel.
Industry
We are engaged in three industries, the direct selling industry,
the coffee industry, and the hemp industry.
Direct Selling Segment. Direct selling is a business distribution model
that allows a company to market its products directly to consumers
by means of independent contractors and relationship referrals.
Independent, unsalaried salespeople, referred to as distributors,
represent us and are awarded a commission based upon the volume of
product sold through each of their independent business
operations.
The World Federation of Direct Selling Association reported in its
June 2019 Global Sales by Product
Category - 2018 report that the
fastest growing product category in 2018 was wellness followed by
cosmetics & personal care, representing approximately 64% of
total retail sales. Wellness products include weight-loss products
and dietary supplements.
The Direct Selling Association reported in its 2019
Growth &
Outlook Report that retail
sales through the direct selling channel in the U.S. for 2018 grew
in two of the industry’s largest product categories of
wellness and services, representing 35.6% and 22.6% of retail sales
respectively. Strong macro-economic metrics like the gross domestic
product, overall retail sales, and consumer sentiment helped fuel
direct sales growth in these key categories, as well the industry
overall. In addition, the Direct Selling Association estimated
direct selling retail sales in the U.S. were $35.4 million in 2018
and estimated growth of 1-3% per year through
2021.
Commercial Coffee
Segment. Our
coffee segment includes coffee bean roasting, mill processing and
the sales of green coffee beans. Our roasting facility, located in
Miami, Florida, procures coffee primarily from Central America. Our
green coffee business primarily procures coffee beans from
Nicaragua by way of growing our own coffee beans and milling
unprocessed green coffee beans that we will later purchase as
processed green coffee beans. CLR sells coffee to domestic and
international customers, both green and roasted
coffee.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (the “USDA”)
reported in its December 2019 Coffee: World Markets and
Trade” report for
2019/2020 that world coffee production is forecasted to be 169.3
million bags, 5.3 million bags lower than the previous year. Global
consumption for 2020 is forecasted at 166.4 million bags. The
report further indicated that for 2020, Central America and Mexico
are forecasted to contribute 19.1 million bags of coffee beans of
which nearly half of the exports are destined to the European
Union, followed by about one-third to the U.S. The U.S. imports the
second-largest amount of coffee beans worldwide and is forecasted
at 26.2 million bags in 2020, 1 million bags lower than last
year.
Commercial Hemp Segment. Our
commercial hemp segment provides hemp extraction technology and
equipment and related services to customers which enable them to
extract CBD oils from hemp stock.
The 2018 Farm Bill, as further discussed in the government
regulations section below, brought immense change to the industrial
hemp industry, legalizing the cultivation of hemp and opening
opportunities for a brand-new CBD industry. With the move of hemp
from the controlled substances list to an agricultural commodity,
numerous companies entered the CBD space, including large
retailers. The Hemp Industry Daily reported that CBD sales in the
U.S. in 2019 were estimated at approximately $1.1 billion and would
grow up to $7.5 billion by 2023, a compounded annual growth rate of
over 46%.
Competition
Direct Selling Segment. The diet fitness and health food industries, as
well as the food and drink industries in general, are highly
competitive, rapidly evolving, and subject to constant change. The
number of competitors in the overall diet, fitness, health food,
and nutraceutical industries is virtually endless. We believe that
existing industry competitors are likely to continue to expand
their product offerings. Moreover, because there are few, if any,
substantial barriers to entry, we expect that new competitors are
likely to enter the “functional foods” and
nutraceutical markets and attempt to market “functional
food” or nutraceutical coffee products similar to our
products, which would result in greater competition. We cannot be
certain that we will be able to compete successfully in this
extremely competitive market.
We face competition from competing products in each of our lines of
business, in both the domestic and international markets.
Worldwide, we compete against products sold to consumers by other
direct selling and direct sales companies and through the Internet,
and against products sold through the mass market and prestige
retail channels. We also face increasing competition in our
developing and emerging markets.
Within the direct selling channel, we compete on a regional and
often country-by-country basis, with our direct selling
competitors. There are also a number of direct selling companies
that sell product lines similar to ours, some of which also have
worldwide operations and compete with us globally. We compete
against large and well-known companies that manufacture and sell
broad product lines through various types of retail establishments
such as General Foods and Nestlé. In addition, we compete
against many other companies that manufacture and sell in narrower
product lines sold through retail establishments. This industry is
highly competitive, and some of our principal competitors in the
industry are larger than we are and have greater resources than we
do. Competitive activities on their part could cause our sales to
suffer. We have many competitors in the highly competitive energy
drink, skin care and cosmetic, coffee, pet line and pharmacy card
industries globally, including retail establishments, principally
department stores, and specialty retailers, and direct-mail
companies specializing in these products. Our largest direct sales
competitors are Herbalife, Amway, USANA and NuSkin. In the energy
drink market, we compete with companies such as Red Bull, Gatorade
and Rock Star. Our beauty, skin care and cosmetic products compete
with Avon and Bare Essentials. From time to time, we need to reduce
the prices for some of our products to respond to competitive and
customer pressures or to maintain our position in the marketplace.
Such pressures also may restrict our ability to increase prices in
response to raw material and other cost increases. Any reduction in
prices as a result of competitive pressures, or any failure to
increase prices when raw material costs increase, would harm profit
margins and, if our sales volumes fail to grow sufficiently to
offset any reduction in margins, our results of operations would
suffer.
We are also subject to significant competition from other network
marketing organizations for the time, attention, and commitment of
new and existing distributors. Our ability to remain competitive
depends, in significant part, on our success in recruiting and
retaining distributors. There can be no assurance that our programs
for recruiting and retaining distributors will be successful. The
pool of individuals who may be interested in network marketing is
limited in each market and it is reduced to the extent other
network marketing companies successfully recruit these individuals
into their businesses. Although we believe we offer an attractive
opportunity for distributors, there can be no assurance that other
network marketing companies will not be able to recruit our
existing distributors or deplete the pool of potential distributors
in a given market.
Commercial Coffee Segment. With respect to our coffee products, we compete
not only with other widely advertised branded products, but also
with private label or generic products that generally are sold at
lower prices. Consumers’ willingness to purchase our products
will depend upon our ability to maintain consumer confidence that
our products are of a higher quality and provide greater value than
less expensive alternatives. If the difference in quality between
our brands and private label products narrows, or if there is a
perception of such a narrowing, then consumers may choose not to
buy our products at prices that are profitable for us. If we do not
succeed in effectively differentiating ourselves from our
competitors in specialty coffee, including by developing and
maintaining our brands, or our competitors adopt our strategies,
then our competitive position may be weakened and our sales of
specialty coffee, and accordingly our profitability, may be
materially adversely affected.
Commercial Hemp Segment. The
market for the sale of CBD-based products is fragmented and
intensely competitive. Competition within the
CBD industry is intense with many well-established companies within
the market and numerous start-up companies entering the market. We
believe we compete based upon the quality of our products and
through our competitive advantage of providing field-to-finish
products and services. We expect that the quantity and composition
of the competitive environment will continue to evolve as the
industry matures and new customers enter the
marketplace.
Government Regulations
The processing, formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling,
advertising, and distribution of our products are subject to
federal laws and regulation by one or more federal agencies,
including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the
“FDA”), the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the
“FTC”), the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
(the “CPSC”), the USDA, and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (the “EPA”). These activities are
also regulated by various state, local, and international laws and
agencies of the states and localities in which our products are
sold. Government regulations may prevent or delay the introduction,
result in current product being sold within those markets, to be
barred from importation into those markets that may significantly
decrease revenues and increase costs within, or require the
reformulation, of our products, which could result in lost revenues
and increased costs in all three of our segments. Additionally,
regulatory agencies within international markets may require the
Company adhere to local market registration requirements for our
products that may require reformulation, labeling and warehousing
controls to be established for those products that may also
significantly decrease revenues or increase costs.
The FDA regulates, among other things, the composition, safety,
labeling, and marketing of dietary supplements (including vitamins,
minerals, herbs, and other dietary ingredients for human use, as
well as CBD with the passage of the Farm Bill as further described
below). The FDA may not accept the evidence of safety for any new
dietary ingredient that we may wish to market, may determine that a
particular dietary supplement or ingredient presents an
unacceptable health risk, and may determine that a particular claim
or statement of nutritional value that we use to support the
marketing of a dietary supplement is an impermissible drug claim,
is not substantiated, or is an unauthorized version of a
“health claim.” Any of these actions could prevent us
from marketing particular dietary supplement products or making
certain claims or statements of nutritional support for them. The
FDA could also require us to remove a particular product from the
market. Any future recall or removal would result in additional
costs to us, including lost revenues from any additional products
that we are required to remove from the market, any of which could
be material. Any product recalls or removals could also lead to
liability, substantial costs, and reduced growth
prospects.
With respect to FTC matters, if the FTC has reason to believe the
law is being violated (e.g. failure to possess adequate
substantiation for product claims), it can initiate an enforcement
action. The FTC has a variety of processes and remedies available
to it for enforcement, both administratively and judicially,
including compulsory process authority, cease and desist orders,
and injunctions. FTC enforcement could result in orders requiring,
among other things, limits on advertising, consumer redress,
divestiture of assets, rescission of contracts, or such other
relief as may be deemed necessary. Violation of these orders could
result in substantial financial or other penalties. Any action
against us by the FTC could materially and adversely affect our
ability to successfully market our products.
Additional or more stringent regulations of dietary supplements and
other products have been considered from time to time. These
developments could require reformulation of some products to meet
new standards, recalls or discontinuance of some products not able
to be reformulated, additional record-keeping requirements,
increased documentation of the properties of some products,
additional or different labeling, additional scientific
substantiation, adverse event reporting, or other new requirements.
Any of these developments could increase our costs
significantly.
These regulations require dietary supplements to be prepared,
packaged, and held in compliance with certain rules. These
regulations could raise our costs and negatively impact our
business. Additionally, our third-party suppliers or vendors may
not be able to comply with these rules without incurring
substantial expenses. If our third-party suppliers or vendors are
not able to timely comply with these new rules, we may experience
increased cost or delays in obtaining certain raw materials and
third-party products. Also, the FDA has announced that it plans to
publish guidance governing the notification of new dietary
ingredients. Although FDA guidance is not mandatory, it is a strong
indication of the FDA’s current views on the topic discussed
in the guidance, including its position on
enforcement.
In December 2018, the Farm Bill became law. Among other things,
this new law changed certain federal authorities relating to the
production and marketing of hemp, defined as cannabis (Cannabis
sativa L.), and derivatives of cannabis with extremely low (less
than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis) concentrations of the
psychoactive compound delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). These
changes include removing hemp and derivatives of hemp from the
Controlled Substances Act, which means that it is no longer an
illegal substance under federal law. In October 2019, the USDA
published its interim final rule regarding the Establishment of a
Domestic Hemp Production Program which allows hemp to be grown and
processed legally in the U.S. and is legal to transport in
interstate commerce. Although this interim final rule became
effective on the date of publication, it is still subject to
comment and there is a possibility it will be modified from its
current application.
The Farm Bill recognizes hemp as distinct from its genetic cousin,
marijuana, and specifically industrial hemp has been excluded from
U.S. drug laws. The Farm Bill allows for each individual state to
regulate industrial hemp and industrial hemp-based products or
accept the USDA rules. Although no longer a controlled substance
under federal law, cannabinoids derived from industrial hemp (other
than THC) are still subject to a patchwork of state regulations. We
are actively monitoring the regulations and proposed regulations in
each state to ensure our operations are compliant.
In conjunction with the enactment of the Farm Bill, the FDA
released a statement about the status of CBD and the agency’s
actions in the short term with regards to CBD will guide the
industry. The statement noted that the Farm Bill explicitly
preserved the FDA’s authority to regulate products containing
cannabis or cannabis-derived compounds under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and Section 351 of the Public Health Service
Act. This authority allows the FDA to continue enforcing the law to
protect patients and the public while also providing potential
regulatory pathways for products containing cannabis and
cannabis-derived compounds. The statement also noted the growing
public interest in cannabis and cannabis-derived products,
including CBD, and informed the public that the FDA will treat
products containing cannabis or cannabis-derived compounds as it
does any other FDA-regulated products meaning the products will be
subject to the same authorities and requirements as FDA-regulated
products containing any other substance, regardless of the source
of the substance, including whether the substance is derived from a
plant that is classified as hemp under the Farm Bill.
We are subject to federal and state consumer protection laws,
including laws protecting the privacy of customer non-public
information and the handling of customer complaints and regulations
prohibiting unfair and deceptive trade practices. The growth and
demand for online commerce has and may continue to result in more
stringent consumer protection laws that impose additional
compliance burdens on online companies. These laws may cover issues
such as user privacy, spyware and the tracking of consumer
activities, marketing e-mails and communications, other advertising
and promotional practices, money transfers, pricing, product
safety, content and quality of products and services, taxation,
electronic contracts and other communications and information
security.
There are an increasing number of laws and regulations being
promulgated by the U.S. government, governments of individual
states and governments overseas that pertain to the Internet and
doing business online. In addition, a number of legislative and
regulatory proposals are under consideration by federal, state,
local, and foreign governments and agencies. Laws or regulations
have been or may be adopted with respect to the Internet relating
to:
●
|
liability for information retrieved from or transmitted over the
Internet;
|
●
|
online content regulation;
|
●
|
commercial e-mail;
|
●
|
visitor privacy; and
|
●
|
taxation and quality of products and services.
|
Moreover, the applicability to the Internet of existing laws
governing issues such as:
●
|
intellectual property ownership and infringement;
|
●
|
consumer protection;
|
●
|
obscenity;
|
●
|
defamation;
|
●
|
employment and labor;
|
●
|
the protection of minors;
|
●
|
health information; and
|
●
|
personal privacy and the use of personally identifiable
information.
|
This area is uncertain and developing. Any new legislation or
regulation or the application or interpretation of existing laws
may have an adverse effect on our business. Even if our activities
are not restricted by any new legislation, the cost of compliance
may become burdensome, especially as different jurisdictions adopt
different approaches to regulation.
We are also subject to laws and regulations, both in the U.S. and
internationally, that are directed at ensuring that product sales
are made to consumers of the products and that compensation,
recognition, and advancement within the marketing organization are
based on the sale of products rather than on investment in the
sponsoring company. These laws and regulations are generally
intended to prevent fraudulent or deceptive schemes, often referred
to as “pyramid” schemes, which compensate participants
for recruiting additional participants irrespective of product
sales, use high pressure recruiting methods and or do not involve
legitimate products. Complying with these rules and regulations can
be difficult and requires the devotion of significant resources on
our part.
Management Information, Internet and Telecommunication
Systems
The ability to efficiently manage distribution, compensation,
inventory control, and communication functions through the use of
sophisticated and dependable information processing systems is
critical to our success.
We continue to upgrade systems and introduce new technologies to
facilitate our continued growth and support of independent
distributor activities. These systems include: (i) an internal
network server that manages user accounts, print and file sharing,
firewall management, and wide area network connectivity;
(ii) a leading brand database server to manage sensitive
transactional data, corporate accounting and sales information;
(iii) a centralized host computer supporting our customized
order processing, fulfillment, and independent distributor
management software; (iv) a standardized telecommunication
switch and system; (v) a hosted independent distributor
website system designed specifically for network marketing and
direct selling companies; and (vi) procedures to perform daily
and weekly backups with both onsite and offsite storage of
backups.
Our technology systems provide key financial and operating data for
management, timely and accurate product ordering, commission
payment processing, inventory management and detailed independent
distributor records. Additionally, these systems deliver real-time
business management, reporting and communications tools to assist
in retaining and developing our sales leaders and independent
distributors. We intend to continue to invest in our technology
systems in order to strengthen our operating
infrastructure.
Product Returns
Product returns as a percentage of our net sales have been less
than 2% of our annual net sales over the last two years. Our return
policy in the direct selling segment provides that customers and
distributors may return to us any products purchased within 30 days
of their initial order for a full refund. Product damaged during
shipment is replaced. Commercial coffee segment sales are only
returnable if defective. Our hemp segment has minimal returns, if
products are returned for quality assurances, the product will be
corrected to the customers’ expectations.
Human Capital/Employees
At December 31, 2019, we had 415 employees
worldwide. We believe that our success depends upon our ability to
attract and retain key personnel. Although, management continually
seeks to add additional talent to its work force, we believe our
current personnel can meet our operating requirements in the near
term. We expect that as our business grows, we may hire additional
personnel to handle the increased demands on our operations and to
handle some of the services that are currently being outsourced,
such as brand management and sales efforts. As of May 31, 2021, we had 388 full time employees and 4 part time
employees. Of the employees 315 work in our direct selling segment,
46 work in our coffee segment and 31 work in our Hemp
segment.
Our human capital resources objectives include, as applicable,
identifying, recruiting, retaining, incentivizing and integrating
our existing and additional employees. We have no collective
bargaining agreements with our employees and have not experienced
any work stoppages. We consider our relations with our employees to
be good. We provide
employee wages that are competitive and consistent with employee
positions, skill levels, experience, knowledge and geographic
location. The principal
purposes of our equity incentive plans are to attract, retain and
motivate selected employees, consultants and directors through the
granting of stock-based compensation awards.
Emerging Growth Company
At
December 31, 2018, we were no longer an emerging growth company
under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act enacted in April 2012
(the “Jobs Act”). However,
during 2018 we were an emerging growth company until December 31,
2018. Under the Jobs Act a
company should be deemed an emerging growth company until the
earliest of:
(a)
the
last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross
revenues of $1.07 billion or more;
(b)
the
last day of the fiscal year of the issuer following the fifth
anniversary of the date of the first sale of common equity
securities of the issuer pursuant to an effective registration
statement;
(c)
the
date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in
non-convertible debt, during the previous three-year period,
issued; or
(d)
the
date on which we are deemed to be a large accelerated
filer.
As an emerging growth company, we were subject to reduced public
company reporting requirements and were exempt from Section 404(b)
of Sarbanes Oxley. Section 404(a) requires issuers to publish
information in their annual reports concerning the scope and
adequacy of the internal control structure and procedures for
financial reporting. This statement shall also assess the
effectiveness of such internal controls and procedures. Section
404(b) requires that the registered accounting firm shall, in the
same report, attest to and report on the assessment on the
effectiveness of the internal control structure and procedures for
financial reporting.
As an emerging growth company, we were also exempt from Section 14A
(a) and (b) of the Exchange Act which require the shareholder
approval, on an advisory basis, of executive compensation and
golden parachutes.
We elected to use the extended transition period for complying with
new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b)(2) of the
Jobs Act, that allowed us to delay the adoption of new or revised
accounting standards that have different effective dates for public
and private companies until those standards apply to private
companies. Our financial statements for the years ended December
31, 2019 and 2018, as presented in this Annual Report, are in
compliance with the public company effective dates.
Corporate Transactions
In June 2017, an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation
became effective which effectuated: (i) a 1-for-20 reverse stock
split (the “Reverse Split”) of the issued and
outstanding shares of common stock; (ii) a decrease in the number
of shares of (a) common stock authorized from 600,000,000 to
50,000,000 and (b) preferred stock authorized from 100,000,000 to
5,000,000.
On July 11, 2011, AL Global Corporation, a privately held
California corporation (“AL Global”), merged with
and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of Javalution Coffee Company, a
publicly traded Florida corporation (“Javalution”).
After the merger, Javalution reincorporated in Delaware and changed
its name to Youngevity International, Inc. In connection
with this merger, CLR, which had been a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Javalution prior to the merger, continued to be a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the public company. AL Global Corporation
was founded in 1996.
Our Corporate Headquarters
Our corporate headquarters are located at 2400 Boswell Road, Chula
Vista, California 91914. This is also the location of our
operations and distribution center. The facility consists of a 59,000 square foot
Class A single use building that is comprised approximately 40% of
office space and the balance is used for
distribution.
Our telephone number is (619) 934-3980 and our facsimile number is
(619) 934-3205.
Available Information
Our common stock, $0.001 par value is traded on the OTC Pink Market
operated by OTC Markets Group
(“OTC Market’s”) under the symbol
“YGYI”. From June 2017 until November 2020, our common
stock was traded on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol
“YGYI.” From June 2013 until June 2017, our common
stock was traded on the OTCQX
Market operated by OTC Markets under the symbol “YGYI”.
Previously, the common stock was quoted on the OTC Markets OTC Pink
market under the symbol “JCOF”.
Our 9.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock,
$0.001 par value is traded on the OTC Pink Market operated by OTC
Markets “YGYIP”. From September 2019 until November
2020, our 9.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred
Stock, was traded on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol
“YGYIP.”
Additional information about our Company is contained at our
website, http://www.youngevity.com. Information contained on our
website is not incorporated by reference into, and does not form
any part of, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have included our
website address as a factual reference and do not intend it to be
an active link to our website. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K and
amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge
through the investor relations page of our internet website as soon
as reasonably practicable after those reports are electronically
filed with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”). The following Corporate
Governance documents are also posted on our website: Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics and the Charters for the audit
committee and compensation committee.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk, and you
should be able to bear the complete loss of your investment. You
should carefully consider the risks described below and, the other
information in the documents incorporated by reference herein when
evaluating our Company and our business. If any of the following
risks actually occur, our business could be harmed. In such case,
the trading price of our securities could decline, and investors
could lose all or a part of the money paid to buy our
securities.
RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS
There is substantial risk about our ability to continue as a going
concern, which may hinder our ability to obtain future financing.
Our auditor’s report on our consolidated financial statements
contains an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue
as a going concern.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of December
31, 2019 and 2018 have been prepared and presented on a basis
assuming we will continue as a going concern. In addition, our
independent registered public accounting firm has issued a report
that includes an explanatory paragraph referring to our recurring
losses from operations (anticipated continued losses in the future)
and net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt in our
ability to continue as a going concern without additional capital
becoming available. We have sustained significant losses of
approximately $51,988,000 and $20,070,000 during the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The loss for the year
ended December 31, 2019 was primarily due to lower than anticipated
revenues across all our segments, impairment of goodwill and
long-lived intangibles related to our commercial hemp segment,
allowances for bad debt related to our commercial coffee segment
and significant costs related to financing events. Net cash used in
operating activities was $14,337,000 and $12,352,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Based on our
current cash levels at December 31, 2019, our current rate of cash
requirements, we will need to raise additional capital and we will
need to increase revenues and significantly reduce our expenses
from current levels to be able to continue as a going
concern. There can be no assurance that we can raise capital
upon favorable terms, if at all, or that we can significantly
reduce our expenses.
We have a history of losses and there are no assurances we will
report profitable operations in future periods.
We have sustained significant losses of approximately $51,988,000
and $20,070,000 during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2019, revenue from
the direct selling segment and the commercial coffee segment
decreased by 8.5% and 17.2%, respectively, which was partially
offset by the revenue recorded from our commercial hemp segment we
acquired in February 2019. In prior years, we acquired several
direct selling businesses which had increased our direct selling
revenue; however, during the year ended December 31, 2019, we only
acquired one direct selling business. To date, we have not
generated significant revenue from our commercial hemp segment and
there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so in the
future. Until such time, if ever, that we are successful in
generating significant revenue and operating profits which are
sufficient to pay our expenses it is likely we will continue to
report losses in future periods. There are no assurances we will
generate substantial revenues from the new businesses or that we
will ever generate sufficient revenues to report profitable
operations or a net profit.
We are dependent upon access to external sources of capital to grow
our business.
Our business strategy contemplates future access to debt and equity
financing to fund the expansion of our business. To date, revenue
generated from operations has been insufficient to meet our working
capital needs. The inability to obtain sufficient capital to fund
the expansion of our business could have a material adverse effect
on us. During the year ended December 31, 2019 and through the
filing of this report, we raised aggregate of approximately
$23,242,000 in gross proceeds from debt and equity
financings. Our ability to raise capital through the sale of
securities may be limited by the rules of the SEC that place limits
on the number and dollar amount of securities that may be sold. We
do not have any commitments from third parties for funding. A
failure otherwise to raise additional funds when needed in the
future could result in us being unable to complete planned
operations, or forced to delay, discontinue or curtail product
development, forego sales and marketing efforts, and forego
licensing in attractive business opportunities. There can be no
assurances that we will be able to raise the funds needed on
favorable terms, if at all, especially in light of the fact that we
will be unable to sell securities registered on our registration
statement on Form S-3 until at least June 1, 2022 and thereafter we
may be further limited until such time the market value of our
voting securities held by non-affiliates is $75 million or
more.
Our failure to comply with the terms of our outstanding Notes has
resulted in a default under the terms of certain of the notes and,
if uncured, it could potentially result in action against our
pledged assets.
We currently have outstanding an aggregate of $10,115,000 in
principal amount of outstanding Notes, which include $3,090,000 in
principal amount of secured debt related to the balance of our 2019
PIPE Notes from our 2019 private placement. The 2019 PIPE Notes are
secured by all of the equity we hold in KII. These PIPE Notes
originally were due between February 2021 and July 2021. We have
since amended 2019 PIPE Notes in the principal amount of $2,190,000
to extend due dates to between February and March 2022.
We have $2,000,000 in principal amount of secured debt which
related to two-year secured promissory notes we issued in March
2019 which are secured by all of the equity we hold in KII. On
February 18, 2021 we entered into an amendment with the holders of
these promissory notes, extending the maturity date to May 18, 2022
and increasing the interest rate to 16% paid monthly until the
notes are paid in full. As an inducement for the amendment to
extend the maturity date, we issued each note holder 200,000 shares
of our common stock. In addition, we issued one of the note holders
a two-year warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of our common stock
at a price per share of $1.00.
In March 2020, we issued a nine-month senior secured
promissory notes related to our March
2020 private placement debt offering, which is secured by certain
assets in CLR. On April 7, 2021, we entered into a settlement
agreement with the note holder to include an agreed upon payment
schedule of principal and interest payments until the note is paid
in full through January 2022. In addition, as part of the
settlement agreement we have issued the note holder 1,000,000
shares of the Company’s common stock.
In December 2018, CLR, entered into a credit agreement with one
lender pursuant to which CLR borrowed $5,000,000 from Carl Grover
and in exchange issued Mr. Grover a $5,000,000 credit note. In
addition, Siles, as guarantor, executed a separate Guaranty
Agreement. Stephan Wallach and Michelle Wallach, our Chief
Operating Officer and Director, pledged 1,500,000 shares of our
common stock held by them to secure the credit note under a
security agreement with Mr. Grover. The credit note matured on
December 12, 2020 and of date of this filing, remains outstanding;
however, no demand for repayment has been made.
If we fail to comply with the terms of any of our outstanding debt,
including the terms of any amendment or extension of such debt, the
holders of the debt could declare a default under the notes or
credit agreement and if the default were to remain uncured, and any
secured creditors they would have the right to proceed against the
collateral secured by the loans. Any action by secured creditors to
proceed against CLR assets, KII equity or our other
assets would likely have a serious disruptive effect on our
business operations.
In connection with our preparation of our financial statements, we
identified material weaknesses in our internal control over
financial reporting. Until the
material weaknesses are remediated, and our associated disclosure
controls and procedures improve, there is a risk that a material
error could occur and not be detected.
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).
During the preparation of our financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2019, we identified material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting. These material
weaknesses resulted in the determination that restatements to our
financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2019, June
30, 2019, and September 30, 2019 related to revenue recognition
within our commercial coffee segment are required.
In
addition, we determined that certain
fixed assets acquired in the acquisition of Khrysos Global, Inc.,
and the share price valuation for the common stock issued as
consideration were not fairly valued as of the closing date which
resulted in a decrease to the net assets acquired. These material
weaknesses resulted in the determination that restatements to our
financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2019, June
30, 2019, and September 30, 2019 related to the accounting for
acquisitions within our commercial hemp segment are
required.
During
the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2018 we
identified a material weakness in that our commercial coffee
segment did not have proper processes and controls in place to
require sufficient documentation of significant agreements and
arrangements with respect to certain operations in
Nicaragua.
The
material weaknesses we identified during the fourth quarter of the
years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were an aggregation of the
following control deficiencies commensurate with maintaining an effective control
environment to absorb its most recent acquisitions and to meet the
financial reporting requirements of a publicly traded company with
international operations:
●
The
lack of appropriate software and information
technology,
●
Information
technology control design and operating effectiveness
weaknesses,
●
Maintaining
sufficient accounting and information technology personnel with the
appropriate level of knowledge, experience, and training, required
to operate within an environment highly dependent on manual
controls and oversight, and
●
Failures
in operating effectiveness of the internal control over financial
reporting.
The material weaknesses identified in 2018 and in 2019 have not yet
been remediated. There can be no assurances that additional
material weaknesses will not occur in the future. Until the
material weaknesses are remediated, and our associated disclosure
controls and procedures improve, there is a risk that a material
error could occur and not be detected.
If we
are unable to assert that our internal control over financial
reporting is effective, investors may lose confidence in the
accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, the market
price of our common stock could be adversely affected and we could
become subject to litigation or investigations by the stock
exchange on which our securities are listed, the SEC or other
regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial
and management resources.
Our inability to file timely and accurate periodic reports has
caused us to incur significant additional costs and may continue to
affect our stock price and our ability to meet listing requirements
going forward.
As a public company, we are required to file annual and quarterly
periodic reports containing the financial statements with the SEC
within prescribed periods of time. We have not been able to and may
continue to be unable to produce timely financial statements and
file these financial statements as part of a periodic report in a
timely manner with the SEC. Any or all of the foregoing could also
result in the commencement of stockholder lawsuits against us. Any
such litigation, as well as any proceedings that could in the
future arise as a result of a filing delay and the circumstances
which gave rise to it, may be time consuming and expensive, may
divert management attention from the conduct of business, and could
have a material adverse effect on the business, consolidated
financial condition, and consolidated results of operations, and
may expose us to costly indemnification obligations to current or
former officers, directors, or other personnel, regardless of the
outcome of such matter, which may not be adequately covered by
insurance. In
addition, we or members of our management could be subject to
investigation and sanctions by the SEC and other regulatory
authorities.
We also expect to continue to face many of the risks and challenges
which were experienced during the recent extended filing delay
periods, including:
●
Continued
concern on the part of customers, partners, investors, and
employees about the consolidated financial condition and extended
filing delay status, including potential loss of business
opportunities;
●
Additional
significant time and expense required to complete beyond the
significant time and expense the Company has already incurred in
connection with the accounting review to date;
●
Continued
distraction to the senior management team and board of directors as
the Company works to complete future filings;
●
Due to
the limited capital available to the organization, the Company will
continue to operate with a limited number of accounting personnel
and professional resources that may continue to result in failures
to timely complete filings;
●
Limitations
on the ability to raise capital and make acquisitions;
Uncontrollable
impacts of COVID-19;
●
The
material weaknesses identified by management continue to contribute
to the delays in producing and filing the required periodic reports
on a timely basis; and
●
General
harm to reputation as a result of the foregoing.
Our inability to file timely and accurate periodic reports could
result in us being in breach of certain terms of our bank
loans.
As of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are
not in compliance with the covenants under the terms of our bank
loan agreement, specifically related to the delay in our filings of
our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 and
for the quarters ended March 31, 2020, June 30, 2020, September 30,
2020, December 31, 2020, and March 31, 2021, however we have
received a waiver of such covenants. Failure to file future reports
on time or further filing delays, could result in us being in
default for not providing the required quarterly financial
information in a timely manner and the bank could call the loan
balance due immediately.
We cannot assure you that our common stock and preferred stock will
regain listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
On February 2, 2021, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC removed our common
stock and 9.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred
Stock from listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market effective at the
opening of the trading session on February 12, 2021. We had been
notified of the Nasdaq staff determination to de-list its
securities on September 29, 2020 and had appealed the determination
to a Nasdaq Hearing Panel on October 6, 2020. On November 18, 2020,
upon review of the information provided by us, the Hearing Panel
determined to deny our request to remain listed on The Nasdaq
Capital Market and notified us that trading in the Company
securities would be suspended on November 20, 2020. The Nasdaq
Listing Council did not call the matter for review and the staff
determination to delist the Company became final on January 4,
2021.
As a result of the delisting from the Nasdaq Capital Market,
our common stock trade on the OTC Pink market operated by OTC
Markets. The delisting has depressed our stock price, substantially
limit liquidity of our common stock and materially adversely affect
our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms. Delisting from
the Nasdaq Capital Market could also continue to have other
negative results, including the potential loss of confidence by
suppliers and employees, the loss of institutional investor
interest and fewer business development opportunities.
We face risks related to the intended Restatement of our previously
issued financial statements for the fiscal quarters ended March 31,
2019, June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019, and being further
delayed in our complying with our SEC reporting obligations if we
are unable to resume a timely filing schedule.
As discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in Note 1 to our
consolidated financial statements under “Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Report,
our Audit Committee concluded that certain of our previously issued
financial statements should no longer be relied upon because of
certain errors in those financial statements (the
“Restatement”).
As a result of the intended Restatement, our SEC reporting
obligations have been delayed prior to the filing date of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, and we cannot assure when we will
resume a timely filing schedule with respect to our future SEC
reports, including our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
periods ending June 30, 2021,for which there is significant risk
that we will be unable to timely file. Even after we file the
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ending March 31,
2020, June 30, 2020, September 30, 2020 and March 31, 2021, and the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, we
expect to continue to face many of the risks and challenges related
to the Restatement, including the following:
●
we
may fail to remediate material weaknesses in our internal control
over financial reporting and other material weaknesses may be
identified in the future, which would adversely affect the accuracy
and timing of our financial reporting;
●
the
processes undertaken to effect the Restatement may not have been
adequate to identify and correct all errors in our historical
financial statements and, as a result, we may discover additional
errors and our financial statements remain subject to the risk of
future restatement;
●
our
failure to have current financial information
available;
●
the
risks associated with the failure to timely file all of our SEC
reports and consequences of prior or future defaults arising under
our line of credit related to our reporting obligations contained
therein;
●
the
risk that the delay in filing our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q
and Annual Reports on Form 10-K and any failure to satisfy other
stock exchange listing requirements could cause the stock exchange
to commence suspension or delisting procedures with respect to our
common stock;
●
the
outcome of litigation and claims as well as regulatory
examinations, investigations, proceedings and orders arising out of
the Restatement and the failure by us to file SEC reports on a
timely basis;
●
the
incurrence of significant Restatement-related
expenses;
●
diversion
of management and other human resources attention from the
operation of our business; and
●
the
possible unavailability or higher costs of financing options to
fund our ongoing operations or refinance existing indebtedness
resulting from the Restatement and the delayed filing of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q
for the periods ending March 31, 2020, June 30, 2020, September 30,
2020 and March 31, 2021, and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2020.
We cannot assure that all of the risks and challenges described
above will be eliminated and that lost business opportunities can
be recaptured or that general reputational harm will not persist.
If one or more of the foregoing risks or challenges persist, our
business, operations and financial condition are likely to be
materially and adversely affected.
The intended Restatement has caused substantial delays in filing
this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2020, June 30, 2020,
September 30, 2020 and March 31, 2021, and the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, which may result in
future delays in our SEC reporting.
Our ability to resume a timely filing schedule with respect to our
SEC reports is subject to a number of contingencies, including
whether we continue to identify errors in our consolidated
financial statements and effective remediation of the identified
material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting, including processes and training related
thereto.
If we become delayed again in our SEC reporting obligations,
investors would need to evaluate certain decisions with respect to
our securities in light of a lack of current financial information.
Accordingly, if in the future we are not current in our SEC
reporting obligations, any investment in our securities would
involve a greater degree of risk. Any such lack of current public
information may have an adverse impact on investor confidence,
which could lead to a reduction in our stock price and market
capitalization and an increase in our cost of capital. In addition,
if we become delayed again in our SEC reporting obligations, we
will be precluded from registering our securities with the SEC for
offer and sale. This may preclude us from raising debt or equity
financing in the public markets and limit our access to the private
markets and could also limit our ability to use stock options and
other equity-based awards to attract, retain and provide incentives
to our employees.
We are not currently eligible to use a registration statement on
Form S-3 to register the offer and sale of securities, which may
adversely affect our ability to raise future capital or complete
acquisitions.
We are not currently eligible to register the offer and sale of our
securities using a registration statement on Form S-3 and we will
not become eligible until at least June 1, 2022 assuming we timely
file certain periodic reports required under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the date hereof and prior to
such date and our public float exceeds $75,000,000 or our common
stock is once again listed on a national securities exchange. There
can be no assurance when we will meet these requirements, which
depends upon our ability to file our periodic reports on a timely
basis in the future. Should we wish to register the offer and sale
of our securities to the public before we are eligible to do so on
Form S-3, our transaction costs and the amount of time required to
complete the transaction could increase, making it more difficult
to execute any such transaction successfully and potentially having
an adverse effect on our financial condition.
Because we have recently acquired several businesses, recently
entered a new line of business and significantly increased our
investment in our green coffee and hemp businesses, it is difficult
to predict to what extent we will be able to maintain or improve
our current level of revenues and profitability.
No assurances can be given as to the amount of future revenue or
profits that we may generate. Until recently, our business was
comprised primarily of the direct sales of Youngevity® health
products. In the last five years, we completed 16 business
acquisitions of companies in the direct selling line of business,
substantially increasing our Youngevity® health and wellness
product lines. It is too early to predict whether consumers will
accept, and continue to use on a regular basis, the products we
added from these new acquisitions since we have had limited recent
operating history as a combined entity. In addition, in February
2019 we entered into a new business segment, our commercial
hemp segment, which includes field-to-finish hemp-CBD oil, isolate,
and distillate market and has required devotion of both time and
capital. In addition, we continue to
expand our coffee business product line with the single-serve
K-Cup® manufacturing capabilities and our investment in the
green coffee business. It is too early to predict the results of
these investments. In addition, since each acquisition involves the
addition of new distributors and new products, it is difficult to
assess whether initial product sales of any new product acquired
will be maintained, and if sales by new distributors will be
maintained.
Our business is difficult to evaluate because we have recently
expanded our business segments, product offerings and customer
base.
We have recently expanded our operations, engaging in a new line of
business in a fairly new industry as well as the sale of new
products through new distributors. There is a risk that we will be
unable to successfully integrate the newly acquired businesses with
our current management and structure or obtain sufficient financing
for this new business segment. Although we are based in California,
several of the businesses we acquired are based in other places
such as Utah and Florida, making the integration of our newly
acquired businesses difficult. In addition, our dry-processing
plant and coffee plantation is located overseas in the country of
Nicaragua. and we
further expanded our Nicaragua operations by entering into a
construction agreement with our Siles operators to transfer a
45-acre tract of land in Matagalpa and an agreement to build a
second mill to accommodate CLR’s 2019 green coffee contract
commitments. Our estimates of capital,
personnel and equipment required for our newly acquired businesses
are based on the historical experience of management and businesses
they are familiar with and may not be accurate. Our management has
limited direct experience in operating a business of our current
size as well as one that is the hemp industry.
Our ability to generate profit will be impacted by payments we are
required to make under the terms of our acquisition agreements, the
extent of which is uncertain.
Since many of our acquisition agreements are based on future
consideration, we could be obligated to make payments that exceed
expectations. Many of our acquisition agreements require us to make
future payments to the sellers based upon a percentage of sales of
products. The fair value of the contingent acquisition debt, which
requires re-measurement each reporting period, is based on our
estimates of future sales and therefore is difficult to accurately
predict. Profits could be adversely impacted in future periods if
adjustment of the fair value of the contingent acquisition debt is
required.
The impact of changes in the fair value of our derivative
liability associated with warrant may materially impact our results
of operations in future periods.
Several of our warrants that we have issued require that their fair
value be recorded as a derivative liability on the issuance
dates. We are obligated to reassess the obligations
associated with the warrants and, in the event our estimate of the
fair value of the contingent consideration changes, we will record
increases or decreases in the fair value as an adjustment to
earnings, which could have a material impact on our results of
operations, our shareholders’ equity and the market price of
our securities. In particular, changes in the market price of our
common stock, which is one of the inputs used in determining the
amount of the non-cash contingent liability, will result in
increases or decreases in this liability and positively or
negatively impact our net loss or profit for the period. Investors
should not place undue reliance on the impact of these non-cash
changes when evaluating our results of operations in future
periods, as they have no impact on the operations of the
business. Increases or
decreases in the fair value of the derivative liability are
included as a component of total other expense in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations for the respective period.
The changes to the derivative liability for warrants resulted in a
decrease of $5,502,000 and an increase of $4,645,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
We may have difficulty managing our future growth.
Since we initiated our network marketing sales channel in fiscal
1997, our business has grown significantly. This growth has placed
substantial strain on our management, operational, financial and
other resources. If we are able to continue to expand our
operations, we may experience periods of rapid growth, including
increased resource requirements. Any such growth could place
increased strain on our management, operational, financial and
other resources, and we may need to train, motivate, and manage
employees, as well as attract management, sales, finance and
accounting, international, technical, and other professionals. Any
failure to expand these areas and implement appropriate procedures
and controls in an efficient manner and at a pace consistent with
our business objectives could have a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations. In addition, the financing for
any of future acquisitions could dilute the interests of our
stockholders, resulting in an increase in our indebtedness or both.
Future acquisitions may entail numerous risks,
including:
●
|
difficulties in assimilating acquired operations or products,
including the loss of key employees from acquired businesses and
disruption to our direct selling channel;
|
●
|
diversion of management's attention from our core
business;
|
●
|
adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers
and customers; and
|
●
|
risks of entering markets in which we have limited or no prior
experience.
|
Our failure to successfully complete the integration of any
acquired business could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, and operating results. In addition,
there can be no assurance that we will be able to identify suitable
acquisition candidates or consummate acquisitions on favorable
terms.
We generate a substantial portion of our revenue from the sale of
The Beyond Tangy Tangerine line, Osteo-fx line and, Ultimate EFA
line of products. A decrease in sales of these products could
seriously harm our business.
A significant portion of our revenue during the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, approximately 34% and 41%,
respectively, was derived from sales of our Beyond Tangy Tangerine
line, Osteo-fx line and Ultimate EFA line of products. Any
disruption in the supply of the raw materials used for these
problems, any negative press associated with these products or
manufacture and sale of competitive products, could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
Our business is subject to strict government
regulations.
The processing, formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling,
advertising, and distribution of our products are subject to
federal laws and regulation by one or more federal agencies,
including the FDA, the FTC, the CPSC, the USDA, and the EPA. These
activities are also regulated by various state, local, and
international laws and agencies of the states and localities in
which our products are sold. Government regulations may prevent or
delay the introduction, result in current product being sold within
those markets, to be barred from importation into those markets
that may significantly decrease revenues and increase costs within,
or require the reformulation, of our products, which could result
in lost revenues and increased costs to us. Additionally,
regulatory agencies within international markets may require the
Company adhere to local market registration requirements for our
products that may require reformulation, labeling and warehousing
controls to be established for those products that may also
significantly decrease revenues or increase costs. For instance,
the FDA regulates, among other things, the composition, safety,
labeling, and marketing of dietary supplements (including vitamins,
minerals, herbs, and other dietary ingredients for human use). The
FDA may not accept the evidence of safety for any new dietary
ingredient that we may wish to market, may determine that a
particular dietary supplement or ingredient presents an
unacceptable health risk, and may determine that a particular claim
or statement of nutritional value that we use to support the
marketing of a dietary supplement is an impermissible drug claim,
is not substantiated, or is an unauthorized version of a
“health claim.”
Any of these actions could prevent us from marketing particular
dietary supplement products or making certain claims or statements
of nutritional support for them. The FDA could also require us to
remove a particular product from the market. Any future recall or
removal would result in additional costs to us, including lost
revenues from any additional products that we are required to
remove from the market, any of which could be material. Any product
recalls or removals could also lead to liability, substantial
costs, and reduced growth prospects. With respect to FTC matters,
if the FTC has reason to believe the law is being violated (e.g.
failure to possess adequate substantiation for product claims), it
can initiate an enforcement action. The FTC has a variety of
processes and remedies available to it for enforcement, both
administratively and judicially, including compulsory process
authority, cease and desist orders, and injunctions. FTC
enforcement could result in orders requiring, among other things,
limits on advertising, consumer redress, and divestiture of assets,
rescission of contracts, or such other relief as may be deemed
necessary. Violation of these orders could result in substantial
financial or other penalties. Any action against us by the FTC
could materially and adversely affect our ability to successfully
market our products.
Additional or more stringent regulations of dietary supplements and
other products have been considered from time to time. These
developments could require reformulation of some products to meet
new standards, recalls or discontinuance of some products not able
to be reformulated, additional record-keeping requirements,
increased documentation of the properties of some products,
additional or different labeling, additional scientific
substantiation, adverse event reporting, or other new requirements.
Any of these developments could increase our costs significantly.
For example, the Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug
Consumer Protection Act (S.3546), which was passed by Congress in
December 2006, imposes significant regulatory requirements on
dietary supplements including reporting of “serious adverse
events” to the FDA and recordkeeping requirements. This
legislation could raise our costs and negatively impact our
business. In June 2007, the FDA adopted final regulations on GMPs
in manufacturing, packaging, or holding dietary ingredients and
dietary supplements, which apply to the products we manufacture and
sell. These regulations require dietary supplements to be prepared,
packaged, and held in compliance with certain rules. These
regulations could raise our costs and negatively impact our
business. Additionally, our third-party suppliers or vendors may
not be able to comply with these rules without incurring
substantial expenses. If our third-party suppliers or vendors are
not able to timely comply with these new rules, we may experience
increased cost or delays in obtaining certain raw materials and
third-party products. Also, the FDA has announced that it plans to
publish guidance governing the notification of new dietary
ingredients. Although FDA guidance is not mandatory, it is a strong
indication of the FDA’s current views on the topic discussed
in the guidance, including its position on
enforcement.
See “Risks Related To Our Commercial Hemp Business” for
a description of the regulatory risks specifically related our Hemp
business.
Unfavorable publicity could materially hurt our
business.
We are highly dependent upon consumers’ perceptions of the
safety, quality, and efficacy of our products, as well as similar
products distributed by other companies, including other direct
selling companies. Future scientific research or publicity may not
be favorable to our industry or any particular product. Because of
our dependence upon consumer perceptions, adverse publicity
associated with illness or other adverse effects resulting from the
consumption of our product or any similar products distributed by
other companies could have a material adverse impact on us. Such
adverse publicity could arise even if the adverse effects
associated with such products resulted from failure to consume such
products as directed. Adverse publicity could also increase our
product liability exposure, result in increased regulatory scrutiny
and lead to the initiation of private lawsuits.
Product returns may adversely affect our business.
We are subject to regulation by a variety of regulatory
authorities, including the CPSC and the FDA. The failure of our
third-party manufacturers to produce merchandise that adheres to
our quality control standards could damage our reputation and
brands and lead to customer litigation against us. If our
manufacturers are unable or unwilling to recall products failing to
meet our quality standards, we may be required to remove
merchandise or issue voluntary or mandatory recalls of those
products at a substantial cost to us. We may be unable to recover
costs related to product recalls. We also may incur various
expenses related to product recalls, including product warranty
costs, sales returns, and product liability costs, which may have a
material adverse impact on our results of operations. While we
maintain a reserve for our product warranty costs based on certain
estimates and our knowledge of current events and actions, our
actual warranty costs may exceed our reserve, resulting in a need
to increase our accruals for warranty costs in the
future.
In addition, selling products for human consumption such as coffee
and energy drinks involve a number of risks. We may need to recall
some of our products if they become contaminated, are tampered with
or are mislabeled. A widespread product recall could result in
adverse publicity, damage to our reputation, and a loss of consumer
confidence in our products, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business results and the value of our brands. We also
may incur significant liability if our products or operations
violate applicable laws or regulations, or in the event our
products cause injury, illness or death. In addition, we could be
the target of claims that our advertising is false or deceptive
under U.S. federal and state laws as well as foreign laws,
including consumer protection statutes of some states. Even if a
product liability or consumer fraud claim is unsuccessful or
without merit, the negative publicity surrounding such assertions
regarding our products could adversely affect our reputation and
brand image.
Returns are part of our business. Our return rate since the
inception of selling activities has been minimal. We replace
returned products damaged during shipment wholly at our cost, which
historically has been negligible. Future return rates or costs
associated with returns may increase. In addition, to date, product
expiration dates have not played any role in product returns;
however, it is possible they will increase in the
future.
A general economic downturn, a recession globally or in one or more
of our geographic regions or sudden disruption in business
conditions or other challenges may adversely affect our business
and our access to liquidity and capital.
A downturn in the economies in which we sell our products,
including any recession in one or more of our geographic regions,
or the current global macro-economic pressures or the effects of
COVOD-19 on the economy, could adversely affect our business and
our access to liquidity and capital. Recent global economic events
over the past few years, including job losses, the tightening of
credit markets and failures of financial institutions and other
entities, have resulted in challenges to our business and a
heightened concern regarding further deterioration globally. We
could experience declines in revenues, profitability and cash flow
due to reduced orders, payment delays, supply chain disruptions or
other factors caused by economic or operational challenges. Any or
all of these factors could potentially have a material adverse
effect on our liquidity and capital resources, including our
ability to issue commercial paper, raise additional capital and
maintain credit lines and offshore cash balances. An adverse change
in our credit ratings could result in an increase in our borrowing
costs and have an adverse impact on our ability to access certain
debt markets, including the commercial paper market.
Consumer spending is also generally affected by a number of
factors, including general economic conditions, inflation, interest
rates, energy costs, gasoline prices and consumer confidence
generally, all of which are beyond our control. Consumer purchases
of discretionary items, such as beauty and related products, tend
to decline during recessionary periods, when disposable income is
lower, and may impact sales of our products. Any economic downturn
could result in customers having less money for discretionary
purchases as a result of job losses, foreclosures, bankruptcies,
reduced access to credit and sharply falling home prices, among
other things. A downturn in the economies in which we sell our
products, including any recession in one or more of our geographic
regions, or the current global macro-economic pressures or the
effects of COVID-19 on the economy, could adversely affect our
business and our access to liquidity and capital. Recent global
economic events over the past few years, including job losses, the
tightening of credit markets and failures of financial institutions
and other entities, have resulted in challenges to our business and
a heightened concern regarding further deterioration globally. We
could experience declines in revenues, profitability and cash flow
due to reduced orders, payment delays, supply chain disruptions or
other factors caused by economic or operational challenges. Any or
all of these factors could potentially have a material adverse
effect on our liquidity and capital resources, including our
ability to issue commercial paper, raise additional capital and
maintain credit lines and offshore cash balances. An adverse change
in our credit ratings could result in an increase in our borrowing
costs and have an adverse impact on our ability to access certain
debt markets, including the commercial paper market.ng other
things.
In addition, sudden disruptions in business conditions as a result
of a terrorist attack similar to the events of September 11, 2001,
including further attacks, retaliation and the threat of further
attacks or retaliation, war, adverse weather conditions and climate
changes or other natural disasters, such as Hurricane Katrina and
Maria, pandemic situations or large-scale power outages can have a
short or, sometimes, long-term impact on consumer
spending.
The impact of the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak, or similar global
health concerns, could negatively impact our ability to source
certain products, impact product pricing, impact our
customers’ ability or that of our licensee to obtain
financing or have a negative impact on our business.
The
COVID-19 coronavirus has spread to numerous countries, including
the U.S. where we conduct a majority of our business. The impact of
the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak, or similar global health
concerns, has and could continue to negatively impact our ability
to source certain products, impact product pricing, impact our
customers' ability or that of our licensee to obtain financing or
have a negative impact on our business.
Our use
of third-party suppliers for production and shipping of certain
products could be negatively impacted by the regional or global
outbreak of illnesses, including the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak.
Any quarantines, the timing and length of containment and
eradication solutions, travel restrictions, absenteeism by infected
workers, labor shortages or other disruptions to our suppliers and
their contract manufacturers or our customers would likely
adversely impact our sales and operating results. In addition, a
significant outbreak of epidemic, pandemic, or contagious diseases
in the human population could result in a widespread health crisis
that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets of
many countries, including the U.S., resulting in an economic
downturn that could affect the ability of our customers and
licensees to obtain financing and therefore impact demand for our
products. Order lead times could be extended or delayed, and
pricing could increase. Some products or services may become
unavailable if the regional or global spread were significant
enough to prevent alternative sourcing. To date, the outbreak of
the COVID-19 coronavirus has significantly impacted our operations,
and certain of our third-party suppliers have been negatively
impacted. Accordingly, we are considering alternative product
sourcing in the event that product supply becomes problematic. We
are unable to predict the possible future effect on our Company if
COVID-19 coronavirus or another such virus continues to expand
globally and throughout the U.S.
In
addition, the outbreak of the COVID-19 coronavirus could disrupt
our operations due to absenteeism by infected or ill members of
management or other employees, or absenteeism by members of
management and other employees who elect not to come to work due to
the illness affecting others in our office or other workplace, or
due to quarantines. COVID-19 illness could also impact members of
our board of directors resulting in absenteeism from meetings of
the directors or committees of directors, and making it more
difficult to convene the quorums of the full board of directors or
its committees needed to conduct meetings for the management of our
affairs.
The
global outbreak of the COVID-19 coronavirus continues to rapidly
evolve. The extent to which the COVID-19 coronavirus may impact our
business and clinical trials will depend on future developments,
which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence,
such as the ultimate geographic spread of the disease, the duration
of the outbreak, travel restrictions and social distancing in the
U.S. and other countries, business closures or business disruptions
and the effectiveness of actions taken in the U.S. and other
countries to contain and treat the disease.
We face significant competition.
We face competition from competing products in each of our lines of
business, in both the domestic and international markets.
Worldwide, we compete against products sold to consumers by other
direct selling and direct sales companies and through the Internet,
and against products sold through the mass market and prestige
retail channels. We also face increasing competition in our
developing and emerging markets.
Within the direct selling channel, we compete on a regional and
often country-by-country basis, with our direct selling
competitors. There are also a number of direct selling companies
that sell product lines similar to ours, some of which also have
worldwide operations and compete with us globally. We compete
against large and well-known companies that manufacture and sell
broad product lines through various types of retail establishments.
Our largest direct sales competitors are Herbalife, Amway, USANA
Health Sciences and NuSkin Enterprises. In the energy drink market,
we compete with companies such as Red Bull, Gatorade and Rock Star.
Our beauty, skin care and cosmetic products compete with Avon and
Bare Essentials. In addition, we compete against many other
companies that manufacture and sell in narrower product lines sold
through retail establishments. This industry is highly competitive
and some of our principal competitors in the industry are larger
than we are and have greater resources than we do. Competitive
activities on their part could cause our sales to suffer. From time
to time, we need to reduce the prices for some of our products to
respond to competitive and customer pressures or to maintain our
position in the marketplace. Such pressures also may restrict our
ability to increase prices in response to raw material and other
cost increases. Any reduction in prices as a result of competitive
pressures, or any failure to increase prices when raw material
costs increase, would harm profit margins and, if our sales volumes
fail to grow sufficiently to offset any reduction in margins, our
results of operations would suffer.
If our advertising, promotional, merchandising, or other marketing
strategies are not successful, if we are unable to deliver new
products that represent technological breakthroughs, if we do not
successfully manage the timing of new product introductions or the
profitability of these efforts, or if for other reasons our end
customers perceive competitors' products as having greater appeal,
then our sales and financial results may suffer.
If we do not succeed in effectively differentiating ourselves from
our competitors’ products, including by developing and
maintaining our brands or our competitors adopt our strategies,
then our competitive position may be weakened and our sales, and
accordingly our profitability, may be materially adversely
affected.
We are also subject to significant competition from other network
marketing organizations for the time, attention, and commitment of
new and existing distributors. Our ability to remain competitive
depends, in significant part, on our success in recruiting and
retaining distributors. There can be no assurance that our programs
for recruiting and retaining distributors will be successful. The
pool of individuals who may be interested in network marketing is
limited in each market, and it is reduced to the extent other
network marketing companies successfully recruit these individuals
into their businesses. Although we believe we offer an attractive
opportunity for distributors, there can be no assurance that other
network marketing companies will not be able to recruit our
existing distributors or deplete the pool of potential distributors
in a given market.
Our coffee segment also faces strong competition. The coffee
industry is highly competitive, and coffee is widely distributed
and readily available. Our competition will seek to create
advantages in many areas including better prices, more attractive
packaging, stronger marketing, more efficient production processes,
speed to market, and better-quality verses value opportunities.
Many of our competitors have stronger brand recognition and will
reduce prices to keep our brands out of the market. Our competitors
may have more automation built into their production lines allowing
for more efficient production at lower costs. We compete not only
with other widely advertised branded products, but also with
private label or generic products that generally are sold at lower
prices. Consumers’ willingness to purchase our products will
depend upon our ability to maintain consumer confidence that our
products are of a higher quality and provide greater value than
less expensive alternatives. If the difference in quality between
our brands and private label products narrows, or if there is a
perception of such a narrowing, then consumers may choose not to
buy our products at prices that are profitable for us.
Our success depends, in part, on the quality and safety of our
products.
Our success depends, in part, on the quality and safety of our
products, including the procedures we employ to detect the
likelihood of hazard, manufacturing issues, and unforeseen product
misuse. If our products are found to be, or are perceived to be,
defective or unsafe, or if they otherwise fail to meet our
distributors' or end customers' standards, our relationship with
our distributors or end customers could suffer, we could need to
recall some of our products, our reputation or the appeal of our
brand could be diminished, and we could lose market share and or
become subject to liability claims, any of which could result in a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and
financial condition.
Our ability to anticipate and respond to market trends and changes
in consumer preferences could affect our financial
results.
Our continued success depends on our ability to anticipate, gauge,
and react in a timely and effective manner to changes in consumer
spending patterns and preferences. We must continually work to
discover and market new products, maintain and enhance the
recognition of our brands, achieve a favorable mix of products, and
refine our approach as to how and where we market and sell our
products. While we devote considerable effort and resources to
shape, analyze, and respond to consumer preferences, consumer
spending patterns and preferences cannot be predicted with
certainty and can change rapidly. If we are unable to anticipate
and respond to trends in the market for beauty and related products
and changing consumer demands, our financial results will
suffer.
Furthermore, material shifts or decreases in market demand for our
products, including as a result of changes in consumer spending
patterns and preferences or incorrect forecasting of market demand,
could result in us carrying inventory that cannot be sold at
anticipated prices or increased product returns. Failure to
maintain proper inventory levels or increased product returns could
result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights,
specifically patents and trademarks, our ability to compete could
be negatively impacted.
Most of our products are not protected by patents. The labeling
regulations governing our nutritional supplements require that the
ingredients of such products be precisely and accurately indicated
on product containers. Accordingly, patent protection for
nutritional supplements often is impractical given the large number
of manufacturers who produce nutritional supplements having many
active ingredients in common. Additionally, the nutritional
supplement industry is characterized by rapid change and frequent
reformulations of products, as the body of scientific research and
literature refines current understanding of the application and
efficacy of certain substances and the interactions among various
substances. In this respect, we maintain an active research and
development program that is devoted to developing better, purer,
and more effective formulations of our products. We protect our
investment in research, as well as the techniques we use to improve
the purity and effectiveness of our products, by relying on trade
secret laws. Notwithstanding our efforts, there can be no assurance
that our efforts to protect our trade secrets and trademarks will
be successful. We intend to maintain and keep current all of our
trademark registrations and to pay all applicable renewal fees as
they become due. The right of a trademark owner to use its
trademarks, however, is based on a number of factors, including
their first use in commerce, and trademark owners can lose
trademark rights despite trademark registration and payment of
renewal fees. We therefore believe that these proprietary rights
have been and will continue to be important in enabling us to
compete and if for any reason we were unable to maintain our
trademarks, our sales of the related products bearing such
trademarks could be materially and negatively affected. Nor can
there be any assurance that third parties will not assert claims
against us for infringement of their intellectual proprietary
rights. If an infringement claim is asserted, we may be required to
obtain a license of such rights, pay royalties on a retrospective
or prospective basis, or terminate our manufacturing and marketing
of our infringing products. Litigation with respect to such matters
could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and
other resources and could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, or operating results.
We consider our roasting methods essential to the flavor and
richness of our coffee and, therefore, essential to our various
brands. Because our roasting methods cannot be patented, we would
be unable to prevent competitors from copying our roasting methods,
if such methods became known. If our competitors copy our roasting
methods, the value of our brands could be diminished, and we could
lose customers to our competitors. In addition, competitors could
develop roasting methods that are more advanced than ours, which
could also harm our competitive position.
Goodwill and other intangible assets represent significant assets
on our balance sheet, and we may experience further
impairments.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a loss on
impairment of goodwill of $6,831,000 which represented the full
amount of goodwill recognized in connection with the acquisition of
Khrysos Global in February 2019. The impairment was driven by a
decline in the estimated fair value primarily due to the reduction
in the profitability forecasts, as well as increased working
capital requirements which increased the commercial hemp
segment’s carrying value. During the year ended December 31,
2019, we also recorded a loss on impairment of intangible assets
related to the Khrysos acquisition of $8,461,000. For the year
ended December 31, 2018, we recorded a loss on impairment of
intangible assets related to our acquisitions of BeautiControl,
Inc. and Future Global Vision, Inc. and recorded a loss on
impairment of intangible assets of approximately $2,550,000 and
$625,000, respectively. While these charges had no impact on our
business operations, cash balances or operating cash flows, they
resulted in significant losses during the reporting
periods.
If we experience additional impairments in our goodwill, or if our
other intangible assets become impaired, then we will be required
to take further non-cash charges against earnings. Since goodwill
impairment calculations are based on estimates, including external
factors that are outside of our control such as our stock price and
future market and economic conditions, it is possible that we may
need to take additional goodwill impairment charges in the future.
We also perform an analysis of our intangible assets to test for
impairment whenever events occur that indicate impairment could
exist. Examples of such events include: significant adverse changes
in the intangible asset’s market value, useful life, or in
the business climate that could affect its value; a current-period
operating or cash flow loss or a projection or forecast that
demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of the
intangible asset; and a current expectation that, more likely than
not, the intangible asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of
before the end of its previously estimated useful
life.
We may become involved in the future in legal proceedings that, if
adversely adjudicated or settled, could adversely affect our
financial results.
We are a party to litigation at
the present time and may become party to litigation in the future.
In general, litigation claims can be expensive, and time consuming
to bring or defend against and could result in settlements or
damages that could significantly affect financial results. However,
it is not possible to predict the final resolution of any
litigation to which we are, or may be party to, and the impact of
certain of these matters on our business, results of operations,
and financial condition could be material.
Government reviews, inquiries, investigations, and actions could
harm our business or reputation.
As we operate in various locations around the world, our operations
in certain countries are subject to significant governmental
scrutiny and may be harmed by the results of such scrutiny. The
regulatory environment with regard to direct selling in emerging
and developing markets where we do business is evolving and
officials in such locations often exercise broad discretion in
deciding how to interpret and apply applicable regulations. In
addition, our coffee operations are subject to Nicaraguan
regulations. The regulatory environment with regard to our hemp
segment is still uncertain and evolving. From time to time, we may
receive formal and informal inquiries from various government
regulatory authorities about our business and compliance with local
laws and regulations. Any determination that our operations or
activities or the activities of our distributors, are not in
compliance with existing laws or regulations could result in the
imposition of substantial fines, interruptions of business, loss of
supplier, vendor or other third-party relationships, termination of
necessary licenses and permits, or similar results, all of which
could potentially harm our business and or reputation. Even if an
inquiry does not result in these types of determinations, it
potentially could create negative publicity which could harm our
business and or reputation.
The loss of key management personnel could adversely affect our
business.
Our founder, Dr. Joel Wallach, is a highly visible spokesman for
our products and our direct selling business, and our message is
based in large part on his vision and reputation, which helps
distinguish us from our competitors. Any loss or limitation on Dr.
Wallach as a lead spokesman for our mission, business, and products
could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial
condition, or results of operations. In addition, our executive
officers, including Stephan Wallach and David Briskie, are
primarily responsible for our day-to-day operations, with our
coffee operations and hemp operations significantly dependent upon
the services of David Briskie, and we believe our success depends
in part on our ability to retain our executive officers, to
compensate our executive officers at attractive levels, and to
continue to attract additional qualified individuals to our
management team. We cannot guarantee continued service by our key
executive officers. We do not maintain key man life insurance on
any of our executive officers. The loss or limitation of the
services of any of our executive officers or the inability to
attract additional qualified management personnel could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or
results of operations.
The inability to obtain adequate supplies of raw materials for
products at favorable prices, or at all, or the inability to obtain
certain products from third-party suppliers or from our
manufacturers, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, or results of
operations.
We contract with third-party manufacturers and suppliers for the
production of some of our products, including most of our powdered
drink mixes and nutrition bars, and certain of our personal care
products. These third-party suppliers and manufacturers produce
and, in most cases, package these products according to
formulations that have been developed by, or in conjunction with,
our in-house product development team. There is a risk that any of
our suppliers or manufacturers could discontinue manufacturing our
products or selling their products to us. Although we believe that
we could establish alternate sources for most of our products, any
delay in locating and establishing relationships with other sources
could result in product shortages or back orders for products, with
a resulting loss of net sales. In certain situations, we may be
required to alter our products or to substitute different products
from another source. We have, in the past, discontinued or
temporarily stopped sales of certain products that were
manufactured by third parties while those products were on back
order. There can be no assurance that suppliers will provide the
raw materials or manufactured products that are needed by us in the
quantities that we request or at the prices that we are willing to
pay. Because we do not control the actual production of certain raw
materials and products, we are also subject to delays caused by any
interruption in the production of these materials, based on
conditions not within our control, including weather, crop
conditions, transportation interruptions, strikes by supplier
employees, and natural disasters or other catastrophic
events.
Shortages of raw materials may temporarily adversely affect our
margins or our profitability related to the sale of those
products.
We may experience temporary shortages of the raw materials used in
certain of our nutritional products. While we periodically
experience price increases due to unexpected raw material shortages
and other unanticipated events, this has historically not resulted
in a material effect on our overall cost of goods sold. However,
there is no assurance that our raw materials will not be
significantly adversely affected in the future, causing our
profitability to be reduced. A deterioration of our relationship
with any of our suppliers, or problems experienced by these
suppliers, could lead to inventory shortages. In such case, we may
not be able to fulfill the demand of existing customers, supply new
customers, or expand other channels of distribution. A raw material
shortage could result in decreased revenue or could impair our
ability to maintain or expand our business. With respect to our
green coffee, we obtain a significant portion of our unprocessed
coffee beans from local farmers in Nicaragua through their agent
and we are dependent upon such farmers for the supply of our
product. Any decrease in supply of unprocessed beans from such
farmers either related to weather or competitors, could adversely
impact our business.
A failure of our information technology systems would harm our
business.
The global nature of our business and our seamless global
compensation plan requires the development and implementation of
robust and efficiently functioning information technology systems.
Such systems are vulnerable to a variety of potential risks,
including damage or interruption resulting from natural disasters,
telecommunication failures, and human error or intentional acts of
sabotage, vandalism, break-ins and similar acts. Although we have
adopted and implemented a business continuity and disaster recovery
plan, which includes routine back-up, off-site archiving and
storage, and certain redundancies, the occurrence of any of these
events could result in costly interruptions or failures adversely
affecting our business and the results of our
operations.
Our business is subject to online security risks, including
security breaches.
Our businesses involve the storage and transmission of users’
proprietary information, and security breaches could expose us to a
risk of loss or misuse of this information, litigation, and
potential liability. An increasing number of websites, including
several large companies, have recently disclosed breaches of their
security, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly
targeted attacks on portions of their sites. Because the techniques
used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or
sabotage systems, change frequently and often are not recognized
until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate
these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. A
party that is able to circumvent our security measures could
misappropriate our or our customers’ proprietary information,
cause interruption in our operations, damage our computers or those
of our customers, or otherwise damage our reputation and business.
Any compromise of our security could result in a violation of
applicable privacy and other laws, significant legal and financial
exposure, damage to our reputation, and a loss of confidence in our
security measures, which could harm our business.
Currently, a significant number of our customers authorize us to
bill their credit card accounts directly for all transaction fees
charged by us. We rely on encryption and authentication technology
licensed from third parties to provide the security and
authentication to effectively secure transmission of confidential
information, including customer credit card numbers. Advances in
computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography
or other developments may result in the technology used by us to
protect transaction data being breached or compromised.
Non-technical means, for example, actions by a suborned employee,
can also result in a data breach.
Under payment card rules and our contracts with our card
processors, if there is a breach of payment card information that
we store, we could be liable to the payment card issuing banks for
their cost of issuing new cards and related expenses. In addition,
if we fail to follow payment card industry security standards, even
if there is no compromise of customer information, we could incur
significant fines or lose our ability to give customers the option
of using payment cards to fund their payments or pay their fees. If
we were unable to accept payment cards, our business would be
seriously damaged.
Our servers are also vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or
electronic break-ins, “denial-of-service” type attacks
and similar disruptions that could, in certain instances, make all
or portions of our websites unavailable for periods of time. We may
need to expend significant resources to protect against security
breaches or to address problems caused by breaches. These issues
are likely to become more difficult as we expand the number of
places where we operate. Security breaches, including any breach by
us or by parties with which we have commercial relationships that
result in the unauthorized release of our users’ personal
information, could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of
loss or litigation and possible liability. Our insurance policies
carry coverage limits, which may not be adequate to reimburse us
for losses caused by security breaches.
Our web customers, as well as those of other prominent companies,
may be targeted by parties using fraudulent “spoof” and
“phishing” emails to misappropriate passwords, credit
card numbers, or other personal information or to introduce viruses
or other malware programs to our customers’ computers. These
emails appear to be legitimate emails sent by our Company, but they
may direct recipients to fake websites operated by the sender of
the email or request that the recipient send a password or other
confidential information via email or download a program. Despite
our efforts to mitigate “spoof” and
“phishing” emails through product improvements and user
education, “spoof” and “phishing” remain a
serious problem that may damage our brands, discourage use of our
websites, and increase our costs.
Our ability to conduct business in international markets may be
affected by political, legal, tax and regulatory
risks.
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
approximately 15% and 14%, respectively, of our revenue was derived
from sales outside the U.S. Our green coffee business in based in
Nicaragua. We own one plantation and intend to purchase another in
Nicaragua. We anticipate increasing our operations in Nicaragua and
in 2019 further expanded our Nicaragua operations by
entering into a construction agreement with our Siles operators to
purchase a 45-acre tract of land in Matagalpa and an agreement to build a
second mill to accommodate CLR’s 2020 green coffee contract
commitments. Additionally, on April 20 and July 29, 2020, CLR and
KII (the U.S. Partners) entered into agreements (“Hemp Joint
Venture Agreement”) with H&H Export and Fitracomex, Inc.
(“Fitracomex”) (collectively “The Nicaraguan
Partners”) and established the hemp joint venture (the
“Nicaraguan Hemp Grow and Extractions Group” or the
“Hemp Joint Venture”). Our
ability to capitalize on growth in new international markets and to
maintain the current level of operations in our existing
international markets is exposed to the risks associated with
international operations,
including:
●
|
the possibility that local civil unrest, political instability or
changes in diplomatic or trade relationships might disrupt our
operations in an international market;
|
●
|
the lack of well-established or reliable legal systems in certain
areas;
|
●
|
the presence of high inflation in the economies of international
markets;
|
●
|
the possibility that a foreign government authority might impose
legal, tax or other financial burdens on us or our coffee
operations, or sales force, due, for example, to the structure of
our operations in various markets;
|
●
|
the possibility that a government authority might challenge the
status of our sales force as independent contractors or impose
employment or social taxes on our sales force; and
|
●
|
the possibility that governments may impose currency remittance
restrictions limiting our ability to repatriate cash.
|
Currency exchange rate fluctuations could reduce our overall
profits.
In preparing our consolidated financial statements, certain
financial information is required to be translated from foreign
currencies to the U.S. dollar using either the spot rate or the
weighted-average exchange rate. If the U.S. dollar changes relative
to applicable local currencies, there is a risk our reported sales,
operating expenses, and net income could significantly fluctuate.
We are not able to predict the degree of exchange rate
fluctuations, nor can we estimate the effect any future
fluctuations may have upon our future operations. To date, we have
not entered into any hedging contracts or participated in any
hedging or derivative activities.
Taxation and transfer pricing affect our operations and we could be
subjected to additional taxes, duties, interest, and penalties in
material amounts, which could harm our business.
As a multinational corporation, in several countries, including the
U.S., we are subject to transfer pricing and other tax regulations
designed to ensure that our intercompany transactions are
consummated at prices that have not been manipulated to produce a
desired tax result, that appropriate levels of income are reported
as earned by the local entities, and that we are taxed
appropriately on such transactions. Regulators closely monitor our
corporate structure, intercompany transactions, and how we
effectuate intercompany fund transfers. If regulators challenge our
corporate structure, transfer pricing methodologies or intercompany
transfers, our operations may be harmed and our effective tax rate
may increase.
A change in applicable tax laws or regulations or their
interpretation could result in a higher effective tax rate on our
worldwide earnings and such change could be significant to our
financial results. In the event any audit or assessments are
concluded adversely to us, these matters could have a material
impact on our financial condition.
Non-compliance with anti-corruption laws could harm our
business.
Our international operations are subject to anti-corruption laws,
including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the
“FCPA”). Any allegations that we are not in compliance
with anti-corruption laws may require us to dedicate time and
resources to an internal investigation of the allegations or may
result in a government investigation. Any determination that our
operations or activities are not in compliance with existing
anti-corruption laws or regulations could result in the imposition
of substantial fines, and other penalties. Although we have
implemented anti-corruption policies, controls and training
globally to protect against violation of these laws, we cannot be
certain that these efforts will be effective. We are aware that one
of our direct marketing competitors is under investigation in the
U.S. for allegations that its employees violated the FCPA in China
and other markets. If this investigation causes adverse publicity
or increased scrutiny of our industry, our business could be
harmed.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR DIRECT SELLING BUSINESS
Independent distributor activities that violate laws could result
in governmental actions against us and could otherwise harm our
business.
Our independent distributors are independent contractors. They are
not employees and they act independently of us. The network
marketing industry is subject to governmental regulation. We
implement strict policies and procedures to try to ensure that our
independent distributors comply with laws. Any determination by the
FTC or other governmental agency that we or our distributors are
not in compliance with laws could potentially harm our business.
Even if governmental actions do not result in rulings or orders
against us, they could create negative publicity that could
detrimentally affect our efforts to recruit or motivate independent
distributors and attract customers.
Network marketing is heavily regulated and subject to government
scrutiny and regulation, which adds to the expense of doing
business and the possibility that changes in the law might
adversely affect our ability to sell some of our products in
certain markets.
Network marketing systems, such as ours, are frequently subject to
laws and regulations, both in the U.S. and internationally, that
are directed at ensuring that product sales are made to consumers
of the products and that compensation, recognition, and advancement
within the marketing organization are based on the sale of products
rather than on investment in the sponsoring company. These laws and
regulations are generally intended to prevent fraudulent or
deceptive schemes, often referred to as “pyramid”
schemes, which compensate participants for recruiting additional
participants irrespective of product sales, use high pressure
recruiting methods and or do not involve legitimate products.
Complying with these rules and regulations can be difficult and
requires the devotion of significant resources on our part.
Regulatory authorities, in one or more of our present or future
markets, could determine that our network marketing system does not
comply with these laws and regulations or that it is prohibited.
Failure to comply with these laws and regulations or such a
prohibition could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, or results of operations. Further, we may
simply be prohibited from distributing products through a
network-marketing channel in some countries, or we may be forced to
alter our compensation plan.
We are also subject to the risk that new laws or regulations might
be implemented or that current laws or regulations might change,
which could require us to change or modify the way we conduct our
business in certain markets. This could be particularly detrimental
to us if we had to change or modify the way we conduct business in
markets that represent a significant percentage of our net
sales.
Our principal business segment is conducted worldwide in one
channel, direct selling and therefore any negative
perceptive
of direct selling would greatly impact our
sales.
Our principal business segment is conducted worldwide in the direct
selling channel. Sales are made to the ultimate consumer
principally through independent distributors and customers
worldwide. There is a high rate of turnover among distributors,
which is a common characteristic of the direct selling business. As
a result, in order to maintain our business and grow our business
in the future, we need to recruit, retain and service distributors
on a continuing basis and continue to innovate the direct selling
model. Consumer purchasing habits, including reducing purchases of
products generally, or reducing purchases from distributors or
buying products in channels other than in direct selling, such as
retail, could reduce our sales, impact our ability to execute our
global business strategy or have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. If our
competitors establish greater market share in the direct selling
channel, our business, financial condition and operating results
may be adversely affected. Furthermore, if any government bans or
severely restricts our business method of direct selling, our
business, financial condition and operating results may be
adversely affected.
Our ability to attract and retain distributors and to sustain and
enhance sales through our distributors can be affected by adverse
publicity or negative public perception regarding our industry, our
competition, or our business generally. Negative public perception
may include negative publicity regarding the sales structure of
significant, pure network marketing companies which has been the
case recently with large network marketing companies, the quality
or efficacy of nutritional supplement products or ingredients in
general or our products or ingredients specifically, and regulatory
investigations, regardless of whether those investigations involve
us or our distributors or the business practices or products of our
competitors or other network marketing companies. Any adverse
publicity may also adversely impact the market price of our stock
and cause insecurity among our distributors. There can be no
assurance that we will not be subject to adverse publicity or
negative public perception in the future or that such adverse
publicity will not have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, or results of operations.
As a network marketing company, we are dependent upon an
independent sales force and we do not have direct control over the
marketing of our products.
We rely on non-employee, independent distributors to market and
sell our products and to generate our sales. Distributors typically
market and sell our products on a part-time basis and likely will
engage in other business activities, some of which may compete with
us. We have a large number of distributors and a relatively small
corporate staff to implement our marketing programs and to provide
motivational support to our distributors. We rely primarily upon
our distributors to attract, train and motivate new distributors.
Our sales are directly dependent upon the efforts of our
distributors. Our ability to maintain and increase sales in the
future will depend in large part upon our success in increasing the
number of new distributors, retaining and motivating our existing
distributors, and in improving the productivity of our
distributors.
We can provide no assurances that the number of distributors will
increase or remain constant or that their productivity will
increase. Our distributors may terminate their services at any
time, and, like most direct selling companies, we experience a high
turnover among new distributors from year-to-year. We cannot
accurately predict any fluctuation in the number and productivity
of distributors because we primarily rely upon existing
distributors to sponsor and train new distributors and to motivate
new and existing distributors. Our operating results in other
markets could also be adversely affected if we and our existing
distributors do not generate sufficient interest in our business to
successfully retain existing distributors and attract new
distributors.
The loss of a significant Youngevity distributor could adversely
affect our business.
We rely on the successful efforts of our distributors that become
leaders. If these downline distributors in turn sponsor new
distributors, additional business centers are created, with the new
downline distributors becoming part of the original sponsoring
distributor’s downline network. As a result of this network
marketing system, distributors develop business relationships with
other distributors. The loss of a key distributor or group of
distributors, large turnover or decreases in the size of the key
distributors force, seasonal or other decreases in purchase volume,
sales volume reduction, the costs associated with training new
distributors, and other related expenses may adversely affect our
business, financial condition, or results of operations. Moreover,
our ability to continue to attract and retain distributors can be
affected by a number of factors, some of which are beyond our
control, including:
●
|
General business and economic conditions;
|
●
|
Adverse publicity or negative misinformation about us or our
products;
|
●
|
Public perceptions about network marketing programs;
|
●
|
High-visibility investigations or legal proceedings against network
marketing companies by federal or state authorities or private
citizens;
|
●
|
Public perceptions about the value and efficacy of nutritional,
personal care, or weight management products
generally;
|
●
|
Other competing network marketing organizations entering into the
marketplace that may recruit our existing distributors or reduce
the potential pool of new distributors; and
|
●
|
Changes to our compensation plan required by law or implemented for
business reasons that make attracting and retaining distributors
more difficult.
|
There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to
attract and retain distributors in sufficient numbers to sustain
future growth or to maintain our present growth levels, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, or results of operations.
Nutritional supplement products may be supported by only limited
availability of conclusive clinical studies.
Some of our products include nutritional supplements that are made
from vitamins, minerals, herbs, and other substances for which
there is a long history of human consumption. Other products
contain innovative ingredients or combinations of ingredients.
Although we believe that all of our products are safe when taken as
directed, there is little long-term experience with human
consumption of certain of these product ingredients or combinations
of ingredients in concentrated form. We conduct research and test
the formulation and production of our products, but we have
performed or sponsored only limited clinical studies. Furthermore,
because we are highly dependent on consumers' perception of the
efficacy, safety, and quality of our products, as well as similar
products distributed by other companies, we could be adversely
affected in the event that those products prove or are asserted to
be ineffective or harmful to consumers or in the event of adverse
publicity associated with any illness or other adverse effects
resulting from consumers' use or misuse of our products or similar
products of our competitors.
Our manufacturers are subject to certain risks.
We are dependent upon the uninterrupted and efficient operation of
our manufacturers and suppliers of products. Those operations are
subject to power failures, the breakdown, failure, or substandard
performance of equipment, the improper installation or operation of
equipment, natural or other disasters, and the need to comply with
the requirements or directives of government agencies, including
the FDA. There can be no assurance that the occurrence of these or
any other operational problems at our facilities would not have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or
results of operations.
Challenges by private parties to the direct selling system could
harm our business.
Direct selling companies have historically been subject to legal
challenges regarding their method of operation or other elements of
their business by private parties, including their own
representatives, in individual lawsuits and through class actions,
including lawsuits claiming the operation of illegal pyramid
schemes that reward recruiting over sales. We can provide no
assurance that we would not be harmed if any such actions were
brought against any of our current subsidiaries or any other direct
selling company we may acquire in the future.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMERCIAL COFFEE BUSINESS
Increases in the cost of high-quality arabica coffee beans or other
commodities or decreases in the availability of high-quality
arabica coffee beans or other commodities could have an adverse
impact on our business and financial results.
We purchase, roast, and sell high-quality whole bean arabica coffee
beans and related coffee products. The price of coffee is subject
to significant volatility. The high-quality arabica coffee of the
quality we seek tends to trade on a negotiated basis at a premium
above the “C” price. This premium depends upon the
supply and demand at the time of purchase and the amount of the
premium can vary significantly. An increase in the “C”
coffee commodity price does increase the price of high-quality
arabica coffee and also impacts our ability to enter into
fixed-price purchase commitments. We frequently enter into supply
contracts whereby the quality, quantity, delivery period, and other
negotiated terms are agreed upon, but the date, and therefore
price, at which the base “C” coffee commodity price
component will be fixed has not yet been established.
These are known as price-to-be-fixed contracts. We also enter into
supply contracts whereby the quality, quantity, delivery period,
and price are fixed. The supply and price of coffee we purchase can
also be affected by multiple factors in the producing countries,
including weather, natural disasters, crop disease, general
increase in farm inputs and costs of production, inventory levels,
and political and economic conditions, as well as the actions of
certain organizations and associations that have historically
attempted to influence prices of green coffee through agreements
establishing export quotas or by restricting coffee supplies.
Speculative trading in coffee commodities can also influence coffee
prices. Because of the significance of coffee beans to our
operations, combined with our ability to only partially mitigate
future price risk through purchasing practices, increases in the
cost of high-quality arabica coffee beans could have an adverse
impact on our profitability. In addition, if we are not able to
purchase or receive assignments in sufficient quantities of green
coffee due to any of the above factors or to a worldwide or
regional shortage, we may not be able to fulfill the demand for our
coffee, which could have an adverse impact on our
profitability.
Adverse public or medical opinions about the health effects of
consuming our products, as well as reports of incidents involving
food-borne illnesses, food tampering, or food contamination,
whether or not accurate, could harm our business.
Some of our products contain caffeine and other active compounds,
the health effects of which are the subject of public scrutiny,
including the suggestion that excessive consumption of caffeine and
other active compounds can lead to a variety of adverse health
effects. In the U.S., there is increasing consumer awareness of
health risks, including obesity, due in part to increased publicity
and attention from health organizations, as well as increased
consumer litigation based on alleged adverse health impacts of
consumption of various food products, frequently including
caffeine. An unfavorable report on the health effects of caffeine
or other compounds present in our products, or negative publicity
or litigation arising from certain health risks could significantly
reduce the demand for our products.
Similarly, instances or reports, whether true or not, of food-borne
illnesses, food tampering and food contamination, either during
manufacturing, packaging or preparation, have in the past severely
injured the reputations of companies in the food processing,
grocery and quick-service restaurant sectors and could affect us as
well. Any report linking us to the use of food tampering or food
contamination could damage our brand value, severely hurt sales of
our products, and possibly lead to product liability claims,
litigation (including class actions) or damages. If consumers
become ill from food-borne illnesses, tampering or contamination,
we could also be forced to temporarily stop selling our products
and consequently could materially harm our business and results of
operations.
Because our green coffee operations are concentrated within
Nicaragua, we are subject to greater risks than if our green coffee
business was internationally diversified.
Due to the fact that our green coffee operations are concentrated
within Nicaragua, we are subject to greater risks than a company
with coffee operations that are more geographically and
internationally diversified. Political or financial instability,
currency fluctuations, trade restrictions, the outbreak of
pandemics, labor unrest, transport capacity and costs, port
security, weather conditions, natural disasters or other events in
Nicaragua could slow or disrupt our coffee operations, disrupt our
supply of our green coffee and/or adversely affect our results of
operations.
We are dependent upon H&H Coffee Group Export Corp., our
largest customer of our green coffee mill processing services for
the year ended December 31, 2019, and Hernandez, Hernandez Export Y
Compania Limitada to supply and assign unprocessed green coffee to
our mill for processing, as well as the provision of management
services to our Nicaraguan subsidiary.
H&H is an agent of the local producers in Nicaragua and they
supply and assign unprocessed green coffee to our mill for
processing. We do not have a direct relationship with the local
producers and are dependent on H&H, to negotiate agreements
with local producers and assign raw green coffee to us in a timely
and efficient manner for processing at our mill. During the year
ended December 31, 2019, all of the unprocessed green coffee that
was assigned to our mill for processing was supplied to us by
H&H. In addition, H&H Coffee Group Export was our largest
customer for our mill processing services of green coffee beans
during the year ended December 31, 2019. The owners of H&H and
H&H Export have been engaged by CLR as employees to manage
Siles and we have a profit-sharing agreement with them in regard to
profits from green coffee sales and processing with respect to
profit generated from the sale of processed green coffee from La
Pita, a leased mill, or the new Matagalpa Mill. In addition, an
affiliated entity of H&H Export owns 50% of the
Matagalpa Property and has agreed to
contribute $4,700,000 toward construction of the Matagalpa Mill on
the property for processing coffee in
Nicaragua.
We have also collaborated with H&H, our green coffee supplier
and H&H Export, and other third parties in Nicaragua to develop
a sourcing solution by entering into the Finance, Security and
Accounts Receivable/Accounts Payable Monetization Agreement (the
“FSRP Agreement”.) The FSRP Agreement is designed to
provide us with access to a continued supply of green coffee beans
for the 2020 growing season and a solution for funding of the
continued operations of our raw green coffee distribution business.
Under the FSRP Agreement, management has assessed the
collectability of accounts receivable from H&H Export and
believes collectability is more than likely due to the contracted
FSRP Agreement, our history with H&H Export and our continual
communication about future contractual agreements. During the FSRP
Agreement negotiations any repayment or settlement of the accounts
receivable balances related to green coffee sales were
stayed.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, CLR recorded revenues from
mill processing services of approximately $6,416,000 and during the
year ended December 31, 2018 CLR recorded the sale of processed
green coffee beans and recorded green coffee sales revenue of
approximately $3,938,000, to H&H Export. At December 31, 2019
and 2018, CLR's accounts receivable balance for customer related
revenue to be derived from sales to H&H Export were $8,707,000
and $673,000, respectively, of which the full amount was past due
at December 31, 2019, as a result, CLR has reserved $7,871,000 as
bad debt related to this accounts receivable which is net of
collections through December 31, 2020.
In March 2021, CLR entered into a Master Relationship Agreement
(“MA Agreement”) with the owners of H&H in order to
memorialize the various agreement and modifications to those
agreements in order to memorialize each of those agreements.
Additionally, certain events have occurred that have kept the
parties from complying with the terms of each of the original
agreements and have caused there to be an imbalance with the
respect to the funds owed from one party to the other; therefore
this MA Agreement also sets forth a detailed accounting of the
different business relationships and reconciles the monetary
obligations between each party through the end of fiscal year 2020.
Failure of the agreed-up terms contained within the MRA by H&H
and their financial ability to meet their commercial debts, and
loan obligations could have a material impact on the financial
results for our commercial coffee segment.
Interruptions in our supply chain of green coffee or changes in our
relationships with our vendors could adversely affect our gross
margins, expenses, and results of operations.
All of our coffee is sourced, directly or indirectly, from outside
the U.S., and primarily from Nicaragua. For the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, approximately 38.2% and 52.1%,
respectively, of our coffee segment revenue was derived from mill
processing services of green coffee and the sale of green coffee,
for which all of the green coffee used within these revenue streams
was procured in Nicaragua. We do not grow the green coffee that we
mill, process and sell and instead the green coffee that we mill,
process and sell originates with local producers in Nicaragua.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, all our green coffee was
procured from one vendor, H&H, as the agent of the local
producers in Nicaragua. We did not procure any green coffee from
H&H, for the year ended December 31, 2019. We do not have a
direct relationship with the local producers and are dependent on
this vendor to negotiate agreements with local producers for the
supply of green coffee to our mill in a timely and efficient
manner.
In
January 2019, to accommodate CLR’s green coffee purchase
contract, CLR entered into an
agreement with the Nicaraguan Partner, pursuant to which the
Nicaraguan Partner agreed to transfer a 45-acre tract of land in
Matagalpa, Nicaragua to be owned 50% by the Nicaraguan Partner and
50% by CLR. In consideration for the land acquisition we issued to
H&H Export, 153,846 shares of our common stock. The fair value
of the shares issued was $1,200,000 and was based on the stock
price on the date of issuance of the shares. In addition, the
Nicaraguan Partner and CLR agreed to contribute $4,700,000 each
toward construction of a processing plant, office, and storage
facilities on the Matagalpa Property for processing coffee in
Nicaragua. As of the date
of this filing, the Matagalpa Mill project is still incomplete for
total operations. If our fulfillment network does not operate
properly or if a vendor fails to deliver on its commitments,
whether due to financial difficulties or other reasons, we could
experience delivery delays or an inability to meet required
commitments which could adversely affect our gross margins,
expenses and results of operations.
Our estimates of revenue derived from the sale of green coffee
have been based upon revenue recognition policies that have changed
and have resulted in decreased revenue recognition in
2019.
During the first three quarters of the year ended December 31,
2019, all of the revenue derived from our sale of processed green
coffee to H&H Export was initially recognized as green coffee
sales revenue, on a gross basis, without giving effect to
deductions for expenses directly attributed to the procurement and
processing of such green coffee. On October 12, 2020,
our Audit Committee determined that
our financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2019,
June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019 could no longer be relied upon
and were restated to reflect revenue from mill processing of green
coffee for H&H Export on a net basis. This change resulted in a
substantial decrease in revenue and cost of revenue reported in our
financial statements for such quarters despite having
no material impact on our net
income/loss.
A significant portion of our commercial coffee segment revenue and
purchases for the year ended December 31, 2019 has been generated
from sales from few customers and for the year ended December 31,
2018 has been generated from sales from a few customers and
suppliers.
The
agent that represents the producers that assigns green coffee for
processing at our mill, H&H, is related to our largest customer
of our mill processing of green coffee, H&H Export. The
termination of our relationship with either H&H Export or
Rothfos Corporation would adversely affect our business. For the
year ended December 31, 2019, our commercial coffee segment had
three customers, H&H
Export, Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. and Topco Associates, LLC, that individually
comprised more than 10% of our commercial coffee segment revenue
and in the aggregate approximated 54% of total segment revenue. For
the year ended December 31, 2018, our commercial coffee segment had
two customers, H&H Export and Rothfos Corporation that
individually comprised more than 10% of our commercial coffee
segment revenue and in the aggregate approximated 49% of total
segment revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded
revenues from green coffee milling and
processing services of approximately $6,416,000 that
approximated 33% of commercial coffee segment revenue from H&H
Export. During the year ended December
31, 2018, we recorded revenue from the sale of processed green
coffee beans of $3,938,000 that approximated 17% of
commercial coffee segment revenue from H&H
Export.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the commercial coffee segment
primarily made purchases of processed green coffee beans from four
vendors, INTL FC Stone Merchant Services, Rothfos Corporation,
Sixto Packaging and the Serengeti Trading Co., that individually
comprised more than 10% of total segment purchases and in aggregate
approximated 73% of our total segment purchases. For the year ended
December 31, 2018, the commercial coffee segment made purchases of
processed green coffee beans from two vendors, H&H and Rothfos
Corporation, which individually comprised more than 10% of total
segment purchases and in aggregate approximated 83% of total
segment purchases.
CLR made purchases from H&H Export of processed green coffee
for the year ended December 31, 2018, that approximated 45%,
of total coffee segment purchases for
use in selling processed green coffee to other third parties and
for use in CLR’s Miami roasting facilities. CLR did not have
any purchases of processed green coffee from H&H Export during
the year ended December 31, 2019.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMERCIAL HEMP BUSINESS
Uncertainty caused by potential changes to legal regulations could
impact the use of CBD products.
There is substantial uncertainty and different interpretations
among federal, state, and local regulatory agencies, legislators,
academics and businesses as to the scope of operation of Farm
Bill-compliant hemp programs relative to the emerging regulation of
cannabinoids. These different opinions include, but are not limited
to, the regulation of cannabinoids by the U.S. Drug Enforcement
Administration, or DEA, and/or the FDA and the extent to which
manufacturers of products containing Farm Bill-compliant
cultivators and processors may engage in interstate commerce. The
uncertainties cannot be resolved without further federal, and
perhaps even state-level, legislation, regulation or a definitive
judicial interpretation of existing legislation and rules. If these
uncertainties continue, they may have an adverse effect upon the
introduction of our products in different markets.
Changes to state laws pertaining to industrial hemp could slow the
use of industrial hemp which would materially impact our revenues
in future periods.
As of the date hereof, approximately 48 states authorized
industrial hemp programs pursuant to the Farm Bill. Continued
development of the industrial hemp industry will be dependent upon
new legislative authorization of industrial hemp at the state
level, and further amendment or supplementation of legislation at
the federal level. Any number of events or occurrences could slow
or halt progress all together in this space. While progress within
the industrial hemp industry is currently encouraging, growth is
not assured. While there appears to be ample public support for
favorable legislative action, numerous factors may impact or
negatively affect the legislative process(es) within the various
states where we have business interests. Any one of these factors
could slow or halt use of industrial hemp, which could negatively
impact the business up to possibly causing us to discontinue
operations as a whole.
New legislation or regulations which impose substantial new
regulatory requirements on the manufacture, packaging, labeling,
advertising and distribution and sale of hemp-derived products
could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition
and prospects.
For the
year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded revenue of $887,000
related to our commercial hemp segment. We believe that the sale of
our hemp-derived products are in compliance with all applicable
regulations since all of our hemp products contain less than 0.3%
THC and are sold only in states in the U.S. that have not
prohibited the sale of hemp products. The rapidly changing
regulatory landscape regarding hemp-derived products presents a
substantial risk to the success and ongoing viability of the hemp
industry in general and our ability to offer and market
hemp-derived products. New legislation or regulations may be
introduced at either the federal and/or state level which, if
passed, could impose substantial new regulatory requirements on the
manufacture, packaging, labeling, advertising and distribution and
sale of hemp-derived products, such as our Hemp FX™ CBD oil
products. New legislation or regulations may also require the
reformulation, elimination or relabeling of certain products to
meet new standards and revisions to certain sales and marketing
materials, and it is possible that the costs of complying with
these new regulatory requirements could be material.
“Marijuana”
is illegal under the federal Controlled Substances Act
(“CSA”). The 2018 Farm Bill modified the definition of
“marijuana” in the CSA so that the definition of
“marijuana” no longer includes hemp. The 2018 Farm Bill
defines hemp as the “plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of
that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives,
extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of
isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9
tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry
weight basis.” All of our hemp-derived products contain
less than 0.3% delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration content.
As such, we believe that the manufacture, packaging, labeling,
advertising, distribution and sale of our hemp-derived products do
not violate the CSA. If federal or state regulatory authorities,
however, were to determine that industrial hemp and derivatives
could be treated by federal and state regulatory authorities as
“marijuana”, we could no longer offer our Hemp
FX™ CBD oil products legally and could potentially be subject
to regulatory action. Although we are unaware of any enforcement
actions to date against the sale of hemp-related products, any
enforcement action could be detrimental to our business. Violations
of U.S. federal laws and regulations could result in significant
fines, penalties, administrative sanctions, convictions or
settlements arising from civil proceedings conducted by the U.S.
federal government including but not limited to disgorgement of
profits, cessation of business activities or divestiture. Any such
actions could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
The
FDA, the FTC and their state-level equivalents, also possess broad
authority to enforce the provisions of federal and state law,
respectively, applicable to consumer products and safeguards as
such relate to foods, dietary supplements and cosmetics, including
powers to issue a public warning or notice of violation letter to a
Company, publicize information about illegal products, detain
products intended for import or export (in conjunction with U.S.
Customs and Border Protection) or otherwise deemed illegal, request
a recall of illegal products from the market, and request the
Department of Justice, or the state-level equivalent, to initiate a
seizure action, an injunction action, or a criminal prosecution in
the U.S. or respective state courts. The initiation of any
regulatory action towards industrial hemp or hemp derivatives by
the FDA, the FTC or any other related federal or state agency,
would result in greater legal cost to the Company, may result in
substantial financial penalties and enjoinment from certain
business-related activities, and if such actions were publicly
reported, they may have a materially adverse effect on our business
and its results of operations.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INVESTING IN OUR COMPANY AND OUR
SECURITIES
Our Series D preferred stock is subordinate to our existing and
future debt, and interests of the Series D preferred stock could be
diluted by the issuance of additional preferred shares and by other
transactions.
The Series D preferred stock ranks junior to all of our existing
and future debt and to other non-equity claims on us and our assets
available to satisfy claims against us, including claims in
bankruptcy, liquidation or similar proceedings. Our future debt may
include restrictions on our ability to pay distributions to
preferred stockholders. Our charter currently authorizes the
issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or
more classes or series. At December 31, 2019, there were 161,135
shares of Series A preferred stock designated all of which are
outstanding, 1,052,631 shares of Series B preferred stock
designated of which 129,332 are outstanding, 700,000 shares of
Series C preferred stock designated of which no shares of Series C
preferred stock were outstanding, and 650,000 shares of Series D
preferred stock designated of which 578,898 shares of Series D
preferred stock are outstanding. Subject to limitations prescribed
by Delaware law and our charter, our board of directors is
authorized to issue, from our authorized but unissued shares of
capital stock, preferred stock in such classes or series as our
board of directors may determine and to establish from time to time
the number of shares of preferred stock to be included in any such
class or series. The issuance of additional shares of Series D
preferred stock or additional shares of Series A preferred stock,
Series B preferred stock or Series C preferred stock or another
series of preferred stock designated as ranking on parity with the
Series D preferred stock would dilute the interests of the holders
of shares of the Series D preferred stock and our other security
holders, and the issuance of shares of any class or series of our
capital stock expressly designated as ranking senior to the Series
D preferred stock or the incurrence of additional indebtedness
could affect our ability to pay distributions on, redeem or pay the
liquidation preference on the Series D preferred stock. The Series
D preferred stock does not contain any terms relating to or
limiting our indebtedness or affording the holders of shares of the
Series D preferred stock protection in the event of a highly
leveraged or other transaction, including a merger or the sale,
lease or conveyance of all or substantially all our assets, that
might adversely affect the holders of shares of the Series D
preferred stock, so long as the rights, preferences, privileges or
voting power of the Series D preferred stock or the holders thereof
are not materially and adversely affected.
None of our preferred stock has been rated.
None of our preferred stock has been rated by any nationally
recognized statistical rating organization, which may negatively
affect their market value and your ability to sell such shares. No
assurance can be given, however, that one or more rating agencies
might not independently determine to issue such a rating or that
such a rating, if issued, would not adversely affect the market
price of our Series D preferred stock. In addition, we may elect in
the future to obtain a rating of our Series D preferred stock,
which could adversely impact the market price of our Series D
preferred stock. Ratings only reflect the views of the rating
agency or agencies issuing the ratings and such ratings could be
revised downward or withdrawn entirely at the discretion of the
issuing rating agency if, in its judgment, circumstances so
warrant. Any such downward revision or withdrawal of a rating could
have an adverse effect on the market price of our Series D
preferred stock.
A holder of shares of the Series D preferred stock has extremely
limited voting rights.
The voting rights as a holder of shares of the Series D preferred
stock are limited. Our shares of common stock are the only class of
our securities carrying full voting rights. Voting rights for
holders of shares of the Series D preferred stock exist primarily
with respect to adverse changes in the terms of the Series D
preferred stock and the creation of additional classes or series of
preferred shares that are senior to the Series D preferred
stock.
Our cash available for distributions may not be sufficient to pay
distributions on the Series D preferred stock at expected levels,
and we cannot assure you of our ability to pay distributions in the
future. We may use borrowed funds or funds from other sources to
pay distributions, which may adversely impact our
operations.
We intend to pay regular monthly distributions to holders of our
Series D preferred stock. Distributions declared by us will be
authorized by our board of directors in its sole discretion out of
assets legally available for distribution and will depend upon a
number of factors, including our earnings, our financial condition,
restrictions under applicable law, our need to comply with the
terms of our existing financing arrangements, the capital
requirements of our company and other factors as our board of
directors may deem relevant from time to time. We may be required
to fund distributions from working capital, proceeds of this
offering or a sale of assets to the extent distributions exceed
earnings or cash flows from operations. Funding distributions from
working capital would restrict our operations. If we are required
to sell assets to fund distributions, such asset sales may occur at
a time or in a manner that is not consistent with our disposition
strategy. If we borrow to fund distributions, our leverage ratios
and future interest costs would increase, thereby reducing our
earnings and cash available for distribution from what they
otherwise would have been. We may not be able to pay distributions
in the future. In addition, some of our distributions may be
considered a return of capital for income tax purposes. If we
decide to make distributions in excess of our current and
accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions would
generally be considered a return of capital for federal income tax
purposes to the extent of the holder’s adjusted tax basis in
its shares. A return of capital is not taxable, but it has the
effect of reducing the holder’s adjusted tax basis in its
investment. If distributions exceed the adjusted tax basis of a
holder’s shares, they will be treated as gain from the sale
or exchange of such stock.
We could be prevented from paying cash dividends on the Series D
preferred stock due to prescribed legal requirements.
Holders of shares of Series D preferred stock do not have a right
to dividends on such shares unless declared or set aside for
payment by our board of directors. Under Delaware law, cash
dividends on capital stock may only be paid from
“surplus” or, if there is no “surplus,”
from the corporation’s net profits for the then-current or
the preceding fiscal year. Unless we operate profitably, our
ability to pay cash dividends on the Series D preferred stock would
require the availability of adequate “surplus,” which
is defined as the excess, if any, of net assets (total assets less
total liabilities) over capital. Our business may not generate
sufficient cash flow from operations to enable us to pay dividends
on the Series D preferred stock when payable. Further, even if
adequate surplus is available to pay cash dividends on the Series D
preferred stock, we may not have sufficient cash to pay dividends
on the Series D preferred stock.
Furthermore, no dividends on Series D preferred stock shall be
authorized by our board of directors or paid, declared or set aside
for payment by us at any time when the authorization, payment,
declaration or setting aside for payment would be unlawful under
Delaware law or any other applicable law.
We may redeem the Series D preferred stock and holders of the
Series D preferred may not receive dividends that you anticipate if
we do redeem the Series D.
On or after September 23, 2022 we may, at our option, redeem the
Series D preferred stock, in whole or in part, at any time or from
time to time. Also, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, we
may, at our option, redeem the Series D preferred stock, in whole
or in part, within 120 days after the first date on which such
Change of Control occurred. We may have an incentive to redeem the
Series D preferred stock voluntarily if market conditions allow us
to issue other preferred stock or debt securities at a rate that is
lower than the dividend rate on the Series D preferred stock. If we
redeem the Series D preferred stock, then from and after the
redemption date, dividends will cease to accrue on shares of Series
D preferred stock, the shares of Series D preferred stock shall no
longer be deemed outstanding and all rights as a holder of those
shares will terminate, except the right to receive the redemption
price plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, if any, payable upon
redemption.
Holders of shares of the Series D preferred stock should not expect
us to redeem the Series D preferred stock on or after the date they
become redeemable at our option.
The Series D preferred stock will be a perpetual equity security.
This means that it will have no maturity or mandatory redemption
date and will not be redeemable at the option of the holders. The
Series D preferred stock may be redeemed by us at our option either
in whole or in part, from time to time, at any time on or after
September 23, 2022, or upon the occurrence of a Change of Control.
Any decision we may make at any time to propose a redemption of the
Series D preferred stock will depend upon, among other things, our
evaluation of our capital position, the composition of our
stockholders’ equity and general market conditions at that
time.
The Series D preferred stock is not convertible, and investors will
not realize a corresponding upside if the price of the common stock
increases.
The Series D preferred stock is not convertible into shares of our
common stock and earns dividends at a fixed rate. Accordingly, an
increase in market price of our common stock will not necessarily
result in an increase in the market price of our Series D preferred
stock. The market value of the Series D preferred stock may depend
more on dividend and interest rates for other preferred stock,
commercial paper and other investment alternatives and our actual
and perceived ability to pay dividends on, and in the event of
dissolution satisfy the liquidation preference with respect to, the
Series D preferred stock.
The change of control provisions in the Series D preferred stock
may make it more difficult for a party to acquire us or discourage
a party from acquiring us.
The change of control provisions in the Series D preferred stock
may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an
acquisition proposal for us or of delaying, deferring or preventing
certain of our change of control transactions under circumstances
that otherwise could provide the holders of our Series D preferred
stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the
then-current market price of such equity securities or that
stockholders may otherwise believe is in their best
interests.
The market price and trading volume of the common stock and Series
D preferred stock may fluctuate significantly.
The market determines the trading price for our common stock and
the Series D preferred stock and may be influenced by many factors,
including our ability to timely complete our required filings with
the SEC, variations in our financial results, the market for
similar securities, investors’ perception of us, our history
of paying distributions on the Series D preferred stock, our
issuance of additional preferred equity or indebtedness and general
economic, industry, interest rate and market conditions. The
de-listing of our the common stock and Series D preferred from the
Nasdaq has limited investors’ ability to transfer or sell
shares of common stock or the Series D preferred stock and has
materially adversely affected the market value of the common stock
and Series D preferred stock Because the Series D preferred stock
carries a fixed distribution rate, its value in the secondary
market will also be influenced by changes in interest rates and
will tend to move inversely to such changes.
In the event of a liquidation, a holder of Series D preferred stock
may not receive the full amount of your liquidation
preference.
In the event of our liquidation of the Company, the proceeds will
be used first to repay indebtedness and then to pay holders of
shares of the Series D preferred stock and any other class or
series of our capital stock ranking senior to or on parity with the
Series D preferred stock as to liquidation the amount of each
holder’s liquidation preference and accrued and unpaid
distributions through the date of payment. In the event we have
insufficient funds to make payments in full to holders of the
shares of the Series D preferred stock and any other class or
series of our capital stock ranking senior to or on parity with the
Series D preferred stock as to liquidation, such funds will be
distributed ratably among such holders and such holders may not
realize the full amount of their liquidation preference.
We are generally restricted from issuing shares of other series of
preferred stock that rank senior the Series D preferred stock as to
dividend rights, rights upon liquidation or voting rights, but may
do so with the requisite consent of the holders of the Series D
preferred stock; and, further, no such consent is required for an
increase in the number of shares of Series D preferred stock or the
issuance of additional shares of Series D preferred stock or series
of preferred stock ranking pari passu with the Series D preferred
stock so long as such increase in the number of shares of Series D
preferred stock or issuance of such new series of preferred stock
does not provide for, in the aggregate (taken together with any
previously issued shares of Series D preferred stock), the payment
of annual dividends on (in the case of additional shares of Series
D preferred stock), or on parity with (in the case of any other
series of preferred stock) in excess of $2,437,500.
We are allowed to issue shares of other series of preferred stock
that rank above the Series D preferred stock as to dividend
payments and rights upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up
of our affairs, only with the approval of the holders of at least
two-thirds of the outstanding Series D preferred stock; however, we
are allowed to increase the number of shares of Series D preferred
stock and/or additional series of preferred stock that would rank
equally to the Series D preferred stock as to dividend payments and
rights upon our liquidation or winding up of our affairs without
first obtaining the approval of the holders of our Series D
preferred stock, so long as such increase in the number of shares
of Series D preferred stock or issuance of such new series of
preferred stock does not provide for, in the aggregate (taken
together with any previously issued shares of Series D preferred
stock), the payment of annual dividends on (in the case of
additional shares of Series D preferred stock), or on parity with
(in the case of any other series of preferred stock) in excess of
$2,437,500. The issuance of additional shares of Series D preferred
stock and/or additional series of preferred stock could have the
effect of reducing the amounts available to the Series D preferred
stock upon our liquidation or dissolution or the winding up of our
affairs. It also may reduce dividend payments on the Series D
preferred stock if we do not have sufficient funds to pay dividends
on all Series D preferred stock outstanding and other classes or
series of stock with equal or senior priority with respect to
dividends. Future issuances and sales of senior or
pari passu
preferred stock, or the perception
that such issuances and sales could occur, may cause prevailing
market prices for the Series D preferred stock and our common stock
to decline and may adversely affect our ability to raise additional
capital in the financial markets at times and prices favorable to
us.
The market price of the Series D preferred stock could be
substantially affected by various factors.
The market price of the Series D preferred stock could be subject
to wide fluctuations in response to numerous factors. On February
26, 2021, the last trading price of our Series D preferred stock
was $10.61 and on May 28, 2021 it was $13.82. The price of the
Series D preferred stock that will prevail in the market after this
offering may be higher or lower than the offering price depending
on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not
be directly related to our operating performance.
These factors include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
●
|
prevailing
interest rates, increases in which we expect may have an adverse
effect on the market price of the Series D preferred
stock;
|
|
●
|
trading
prices of similar securities;
|
|
●
|
our
history of timely dividend payments;
|
|
●
|
the
annual yield from dividends on the Series D preferred stock as
compared to yields on other financial instruments;
|
|
●
|
general
economic and financial market conditions;
|
|
●
|
government
action or regulation;
|
|
●
|
the
financial condition, performance and prospects of us and our
competitors;
|
|
●
|
changes
in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts
with respect to us or our competitors in our industry;
|
|
●
|
our
issuance of additional preferred equity or debt securities;
and
|
|
●
|
actual
or anticipated variations in quarterly operating results of us and
our competitors.
|
As a result of these and other factors, investors who purchase the
Series D preferred stock in this offering may experience a
decrease, which could be substantial and rapid, in the market price
of the Series D preferred stock, including decreases unrelated to
our operating performance or prospects.
Our two principal stockholders who are
also our Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and director and our
Chief Operating Officer have significant influence over
us.
Through their voting power, each of Stephan Wallach and Michelle
Wallach has the ability to significantly influence the election of
our directors and to control all other matters requiring the
approval of our stockholders. Stephan Wallach and Michelle Wallach,
his wife, together beneficially own approximately
42.3% of
our total equity securities (assuming exercise of the options to
purchase common stock held by Stephan Wallach and Michelle Wallach)
at May 31, 2021. As
our Chief Executive Officer, Stephan Wallach has the ability to
control our business affairs.
For the year ended December 31, 2018 we reported under an
“emerging growth company,” and any decision on our part
to comply with certain reduced disclosure requirements applicable
to emerging growth companies could make our common stock less
attractive to investors.
At December 31, 2018, we were no longer an emerging growth
company under the Jobs Act. However, during 2018 we were an
emerging growth company up until December 31, 2018.
An “emerging growth company,” as defined under
the Jobs Act, and, for as long
as we continued to be an emerging growth company, we could choose
to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements
applicable to other public companies including, but not limited to,
not being required to comply with the auditor attestation
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in
our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the
requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive
compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute
payments not previously approved.
Under the Jobs Act, a company
is deemed an emerging growth company until the earliest of:
(i) the last day of the fiscal year in
which we have total annual gross revenues of $1.07 billion or more;
(ii) the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth
anniversary of the date of our first sale of common equity
securities pursuant to an effective registration statement; (iii)
the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in
nonconvertible debt during the previous three years; or (iv) the
date on which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer. We
have elected to use the extended transition period for complying
with new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b)(2) of
the Jobs Act, that allowed us to delay the adoption of new or
revised accounting standards that had different effective dates for
public and private companies until those standards apply to private
companies. Further, as a result of these scaled regulatory
requirements, our disclosure for the year ended December 31, 2018
may be more limited than that of other public companies and you may
not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of such
companies.
We ceased to be an “emerging growth company,” which
means we will no longer be able to take advantage of certain
reduced disclosure requirements in our public filings.
We
ceased to be an “emerging growth company,” as defined
in the Jobs Act, on December 31, 2018. As a result, we
anticipate that costs and compliance initiatives will increase as a
result of the fact that we ceased to be an “emerging growth
company.” In particular, we are now, or will be, subject to
certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public
companies that had not been applicable to us as an emerging growth
company. These requirements include:
●
|
compliance
with the auditor attestation requirements in the assessment of our
internal control over financial reporting once we are an
accelerated filer or large accelerated filer;
|
●
|
compliance
with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation
or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional
information about the audit and the financial
statements;
|
●
|
full
disclosure and analysis obligations regarding executive
compensation; and
|
●
|
compliance
with regulatory requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote
on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden
parachute payments not previously approved.
|
There
can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the
applicable regulations in a timely manner, if at all.
Our stock has historically had a limited market. If an active
trading market for our common stock does develop, trading prices
may be volatile.
In the event that an active trading market develops, the market
price of the shares of common stock may be based on factors that
may not be indicative of future market performance. Consequently,
the market price of the common stock may vary greatly. If an active
market for the common stock develops, there is a significant risk
that the stock price may fluctuate dramatically in the future in
response to any of the following factors, some of which are beyond
our control:
●
|
variations in our quarterly operating results;
|
●
|
announcements that our revenue or income/loss levels are below
analysts’ expectations;
|
●
|
general economic slowdowns;
|
●
|
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
|
●
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts;
or
|
●
|
acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital
commitments.
|
The requirements of being a public company, including compliance
with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the
requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act, have
strained our resources and, increased our costs, and we may
continue to be unable to comply with these requirements in a timely
or cost-effective manner.
As a
public company, we must comply with the federal securities laws,
rules and regulations, including certain corporate governance
provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the
“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) and the Dodd-Frank Act, related
rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq, with which a private
company is not required to comply.
We have
been unable to comply with requirements in a timely or
cost-effective manner. Complying with these laws, rules and
regulations occupies a significant amount of the time of our Board
of Directors and management and significantly increases our costs
and expenses. Among other things, we must:
●
maintain a system
of internal control over financial reporting in compliance with the
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the
related rules and regulations of the SEC and the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board;
●
comply with rules
and regulations promulgated by OTC Markets;
●
prepare and
distribute periodic public reports in compliance with our
obligations under the federal securities laws;
●
maintain various
internal compliance and disclosures policies, such as those
relating to disclosure controls and procedures and insider trading
in our common stock;
●
involve and retain
to a greater degree outside counsel and accountants in the above
activities;
●
maintain a
comprehensive internal audit function; and
●
maintain an
investor relations function.
Sales by our shareholders of a substantial number of shares of our
common stock in the public market could adversely affect the market
price of our common stock.
A large number of outstanding shares of common stock are held by
two of our principal shareholders. If any of these principal
shareholders were to decide to sell large amounts of stock over a
short period of time such sales could cause the market price of the
common stock to decline.
Our stock price has been volatile and subject to various market
conditions.
The trading price of the common stock has been subject to wide
fluctuations. On May 11, 2021 the closing price of our common stock
was $0.39 and on May 21, 2021 it was $0.31. The price of the common
stock may fluctuate in the future in response to quarter-to-quarter
variations in operating results, material announcements by us or
our competitors, governmental regulatory action, conditions in the
nutritional supplement industry, negative publicity, or other
events or factors, many of which are beyond our control. In
addition, the stock market has historically experienced significant
price and volume fluctuations, which have particularly affected the
market prices of many dietary and nutritional supplement companies
and which have, in certain cases, not had a strong correlation to
the operating performance of these companies. Our operating results
in future quarters may be below the expectations of securities
analysts and investors. If that were to occur, the price of the
common stock would likely decline, perhaps
substantially.
Securities analysts may not cover our capital stock, and this may
have a negative impact on the market price of our capital
stock.
The
trading market for our capital stock depends, in part, on the
research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish
about us or our business. We do not currently have and may never
obtain research coverage by independent securities and industry
analysts. If no independent securities or industry analysts
commence coverage of us, the trading prices for our capital stock
would be negatively impacted. If we obtain independent securities
or industry analyst coverage and if one or more of the analysts who
covers us downgrades our capital stock, changes their opinion of
our shares or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about
our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more
of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports
on us regularly, demand for our capital stock could decrease and we
could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause
our stock price and trading volume to decline.
We may issue preferred stock with rights senior to the common
stock, Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred
stock.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to
five million shares of preferred stock without shareholder approval
and on terms established by our directors. We may issue shares of
preferred stock in order to consummate a financing or other
transaction, in lieu of the issuance of common stock. The rights
and preferences of any such class or series of preferred stock
would be established by our board of directors in its sole
discretion and may have dividend, voting, liquidation and other
rights and preferences that are senior to the rights of the common
stock and existing preferred stock.
You should not rely on an investment in our common stock for the
payment of cash dividends.
We intend to retain future profits, if any, to expand our business.
We have never paid cash dividends on the common stock and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends on the common stock in the
foreseeable future. You should not make an investment in the common
stock if you require dividend income. Any return on investment in
the common stock would only come from an increase in the market
price of our stock, which is uncertain and
unpredictable.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under
Delaware law could make an acquisition of us more difficult, limit
attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current
management and limit the market price of our common
stock.
Provisions
in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as amended and
restated, may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in
control or changes in our management. Our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
includes provisions that:
●
|
authorize
our board of directors to issue preferred stock, without further
stockholder action and with voting liquidation, dividend and other
rights superior to our common stock; and
|
●
|
provide
that vacancies on our board of directors may be filled only by the
vote of a majority of directors then in office, even though less
than a quorum.
|
These
provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our
stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making
it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our
board of directors, which is
responsible for appointing the members of our management. In
addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed
by the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), which generally
prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any of a broad
range of business combinations with any “interested”
stockholder for a period of three years following the date on which
the stockholder became an “interested” stockholder. Any
of the foregoing provisions could limit the price that investors
might be willing to pay in the future for shares of common stock,
and they could deter potential acquirers of our company, thereby
reducing the likelihood that you would receive a premium for the
common stock in an acquisition.
Reports published by securities or industry analysts, including
projections in those reports that exceed our actual results, could
adversely affect our common stock price and trading
volume.
Securities
research analysts, including those affiliated with our selling
agents establish and publish their own periodic projections for our
business. These projections may vary widely from one another and
may not accurately predict the results we actually achieve. Our
stock price may decline if our actual results do not match
securities research analysts' projections. Similarly, if one or
more of the analysts who writes reports on us downgrades our stock
or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business
or if one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company
or fails to publish reports on us regularly, our stock price or
trading volume could decline. While we expect securities research
analyst coverage following this offering, if no securities or
industry analysts begin to cover us, the trading price for our
stock and the trading volume could be adversely
affected.
Item 1B. Unresolved
Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Operation Properties
Our corporate headquarters are located at 2400 Boswell, Road in
Chula Vista, California. This is also the location of
Youngevity’s main operations and distribution center for the
direct selling segment. The facility consists of a 59,000 square
foot Class A single use building that is comprised 40% of office
space and the balance is used for distribution.
Our commercial coffee segment headquarters is a coffee roaster
processing facility, warehouse, and distribution center located in
Miami, Florida, consisting of over 50,000 square feet. Our lease
for this space expires in May 2023.
Our commercial hemp segment, located in central Florida, leases an
82,000 square foot hemp processing and manufacturing facility in
Orlando, Florida, to house its processing hemp derived products and
finished goods manufacturing facility. The Orlando facility holds
the post processing equipment and the extensive power
systems.
KII owns a laboratory testing facility located in Clermont,
Florida, that provides us with capabilities in regard to
formulation, quality control, and testing standards with CBD
products. In addition, KII owns
a production shop in Mascotte, Florida. In February 2019, KII purchased a 45-acre tract of
land in Groveland, Florida (“Groveland”), which was
intended to host a research and development facility, a greenhouse
and allocate a portion for farming. We determined that its original
plan for use is not viable at the present time as KII shifted its
focus back to its primary core business of extraction of
cannabinoids and the production of products for sale with the
cannabinoids. Currently KII has Clermont, Florida
properties. On May 26, 2021,
the Groveland property was sold for $800,000. KII’s remaining
production property in Mascotte, FL is expected to be listed for
sale by the end of 2021. KII, expects to continue to lease the
82,000 square foot hemp processing and manufacturing facility
located in Orlando, Florida.
Below
is a summary of our operating facilities by location at December
31, 2019:
Location
|
|
Own/Lease
|
Approximate Square Footage
|
Land in Acres
|
Facilities for our direct selling segment
|
|
|
|
|
Chula
Vista, CA, U.S.
|
|
Own
|
59,000
|
-
|
Lindon,
UT, U.S.
|
|
Lease
|
36,373
|
-
|
Provo,
UT, U.S.
|
|
Lease
|
7,156
|
-
|
Auckland,
New Zealand
|
|
Lease
|
3,570
|
-
|
Rosedale,
New Zealand
|
|
Lease
|
14,240
|
-
|
Moscow,
Russia
|
|
Lease
|
1,531
|
-
|
Singapore,
Singapore
|
|
Lease
|
1,539
|
-
|
Guadalajara,
Mexico
|
|
Lease
|
6,830
|
-
|
Zapopan,
Mexico
|
|
Lease
|
1,500
|
-
|
Manila,
Philippines
|
|
Lease
|
4,473
|
-
|
Bogota,
Colombia
|
|
Lease
|
2,153
|
-
|
Lai
Chi Kok Kin, Hong Kong
|
|
Lease
|
1,296
|
-
|
Taipei,
Taiwan
|
|
Lease
|
3,955
|
-
|
Jakarta,
Indonesia
|
|
Lease
|
1,884
|
-
|
Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia
|
|
Lease
|
3,945
|
-
|
Chiba
Chiba, Japan
|
|
Lease
|
98
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities for our commercial coffee segment:
|
|
|
|
|
Matagalpa, Nicaragua (1)
|
|
Own
|
60,505
|
500
|
Matagalpa,
Nicaragua
|
|
Own
|
-
|
45
|
Miami,
FL, U.S.
|
|
Lease
|
50,110
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities for our commercial hemp segment:
|
|
|
|
|
Clermont, FL, U.S. (2)
|
|
Own
|
2,000
|
-
|
Mascotte, FL, U.S. (3)
|
|
Own
|
14,000
|
-
|
Groveland,
FL, U.S. (4)
|
|
Own
|
-
|
45
|
Orlando,
FL, U.S.
|
|
Lease
|
82,000
|
-
|
(1) Arabica coffee bean plantation, dry-processing facility
and mill.
|
(2) Testing laboratory.
|
(3) Production shop. This property is currently
available-for-sale.
|
(4)
Property was sold on May 26, 2021 (Note 14, to the consolidated
financial statements.)
|
We believe that we have adequate space for our anticipated needs
and that suitable additional space will be available at
commercially reasonable prices as needed.
Item 3. Legal
Proceedings
We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings;
however, we are subject to litigation that we deem not to be
material. From time to time, we may be subject to various legal
proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its
business activities. Litigation, regardless of the outcome, could
have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement
costs, diversion of management resources and other
factors.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity,
Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on the OTC Pink Market operated by OTC
Markets under the symbol “YGYI”. From June 2017 until
November 2020, our common stock was traded on Nasdaq Capital Market
under the symbol “YGYI.” From June 2013 until June
2017, our common stock was traded on the OTCQX Marketplace operated
by OTC Markets under the symbol “YGYI”. Previously, the
common stock was quoted on the OTC Markets OTC Pink market system
under the symbol “JCOF”. Price quotations on the OTC
Pink Market reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up,
markdown, or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual
transactions.
Our 9.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock,
$0.001 par value is traded on OTC Pink market operated by OTC
Markets Group under the symbol “YGYIP”.
The
last reported sale price of our common stock on the OTC Pink market on June 22, was $0.30 per
share. The last reported sale price of our Series D Preferred Stock
on the OTC Pink market on June
22, 2021 was $14.43 per share.
Holders
At the close of business on June 23, 2021, there were 640 holders of record of our common
stock. The number of holders of record is based on the
actual number of holders registered on the books of our transfer
agent and does not reflect holders of shares in “street
name” or persons, partnerships, associations, corporations or
other entities identified in security position listings maintained
by depository trust companies.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock and we do not currently intend to pay any cash dividends on
the common stock in the foreseeable future. Other than the payment
of dividends on our Series D preferred stock, we expect to retain
all available funds and future earnings, if any, to fund the
development and growth of our business. Any future determination to
pay dividends, if any, on the common stock will be at the
discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among
other factors, our results of operations, financial condition,
capital requirements and contractual restrictions.
Series B Preferred Stock
In
March 2018, our board of
directors designated 1,052,631 shares as Series B preferred
stock, par value $0.001 per share. The
Series B preferred stock will pay cumulative dividends from the
date of issuance at a rate of 5% per annum payable quarterly in arrears on or about the last
day of March, June, September and December of each year beginning
June 30, 2018. During the year ended
December 31, 2019, we paid $51,000 in cash dividends to holders of
Series B preferred stock. During March 2020, all of our Series B
preferred stock mandatorily converted. Holders of the Series B
preferred stock received 50% share of common stock for each one
share of preferred stock they hold. In March 2020, all outstanding shares of Series B
preferred stock automatically converted into 2 shares of common
stock on the two-year anniversary date of the issuance of the
Series B preferred stock, pursuant to the automatic conversion
feature of the Series B preferred stock and all
unpaid dividends
were paid through that date.
Series C Preferred Stock
In
September 2018, our board of
directors designated 700,000 shares as Series C preferred
stock, par value $0.001 per share. The
Series C preferred stock paid cumulative dividends from the date of
issuance at a rate of 6% per annum payable quarterly in arrears on or about the last
day of March, June, September and December of each year beginning
September 30, 2018. At December 31, 2018, all Series C
preferred stock had been converted to common stock and all unpaid
dividends were paid through that date.
Series D Preferred Stock
In
December 2019, our board of
directors designated an additional 190,000 shares as Series
D preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, to a total of
650,000 shares designated. The holders of the
Series D preferred stock are entitled to cumulative dividends from
the first day of the calendar month in which the Series D preferred
stock is issued and payable on the fifteenth day of each calendar
month, when, as and if declared by the Company's board of
directors. The Company’s board of directors has declared an
annual cash dividend of $2.4375 per share or a monthly dividend of
$0.203125 per share on the Series D preferred stock. During the
year ended December 31, 2019, we paid $203,000 in cash dividends to
holders of Series D preferred stock. (See Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements.)
Equity Compensation Plan Information
See Part III, Item 11 for information regarding securities
authorized for issuance under our equity compensation
plans.
Sales of Unregistered Securities
All sales of our common stock that were not registered under the
Securities Act have been previously disclosed in our filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. There were no sales of
unregistered securities during the three months ended December 31,
2019.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
As a
Smaller Reporting Company as defined by Rule12b-2 of the Exchange
Act and in item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled
disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to
provide the information requested by this Item.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of
operation should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes, which are
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition
to historical information, the following discussion contains
certain forward-looking statements that involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. Where possible, we have tried to
identify these forward-looking statements by using words such as
“anticipate,” “believe,”
“intends,” or similar expressions. Our actual results
could differ materially from those anticipated expressed or implied
by the forward-looking statements due to important factors and
risks including, but not limited to, those set forth under
“Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual
Report. All share and per share numbers reflect the one-for-twenty
reverse stock split that we effected on June 5, 2017.
Overview
At December 31, 2019, we operated in three segments: (i) the direct
selling segment, where products are offered through a global
distribution network of preferred customers and distributors, (ii)
the commercial coffee segment, where products are sold directly to
businesses, the distribution of processed green coffee beans and
provides milling services for unprocessed green coffee beans, and
(iii) the commercial hemp segment, where we manufacture proprietary
systems to provide end-to-end extraction and processing that allow
for the conversion of hemp feed stock into hemp oil and hemp
extracts. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we derived
approximately 86.1% of our revenue from direct sales, approximately
13.3% of our revenue from our commercial coffee sales and
approximately 0.6% of our revenue from our commercial hemp
business. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we derived
approximately 85.5% of our revenue from direct sales and
approximately 14.5% of our revenue from our commercial coffee
sales.
In the direct selling segment, we sell health and wellness, beauty
product and skin care, scrap booking and story booking items,
packaged food products, other service-based products on a global
basis and more recently our Hemp FX™ hemp-derived CBD product
line and offer a wide range of products through an international
direct selling network. Our direct sales are made through our
network, which is a web-based global network of customers and
distributors. Our independent sales force markets a variety of
products to an array of customers, through friend-to-friend
marketing and social networking. We consider our company to be an
e-commerce company whereby personal interaction is provided to
customers by our independent sales network. Initially, our focus
was solely on the sale of products in the health, beauty and home
care market through our marketing network; however, we have since
expanded our selling efforts to include a variety of other products
in other markets. Our direct selling segment offers approximately
5,500 products to support a healthy lifestyle.
We have expanded our operations through a series of acquisitions of
the assets of other direct selling companies including their
product lines and sales forces. We have also substantially expanded
our distributor base by merging the assets that we have acquired
under our web-based independent distributor network, as well as
providing our distributors with additional new products to add to
their product offerings.
We also engage in the commercial sale of roasted coffee products,
the distribution of green coffee beans and provide milling
services, through CLR. CLR sells roasted and unroasted coffee and
produces coffee under its own Café La Rica brand,
Josie’s Java House brand and Javalution brands. CLR also
produces and sells coffee under a variety of private labels through
major national sales outlets and major customers including cruise
lines and office coffee service operators, as well as through
our direct selling business.
CLR acquired the Siles in 2014, a coffee plantation and
dry-processing facility located in Matagalpa, Nicaragua, an ideal
coffee growing region that is historically known for high quality
coffee production. The dry-processing facility is approximately 26
acres and the plantation is approximately 500 acres and produces
100 percent Arabica coffee beans that are shade grown, Rainforest
Alliance Certified™ and Fair Trade Certified™. The
plantation, dry-processing facility and existing U.S. based coffee
roaster facilities allows CLR to control the coffee production
process from field-to-cup.
In the commercial hemp segment, we are a manufacturer of commercial
hemp-based CBD extraction and post-processing equipment, and
end-to-end processor of CBD isolate, distillate, water soluble
isolate and water-soluble distillate. We develop, manufacture and
sell equipment and related services to customers which enable them
to extract CBD oils from hemp stock. We provide hemp growers,
feedstock suppliers, and CBD crude oil producers the use of
equipment, intellectual capital, production consultancy, tolling
services, and wholesale CBD channel sales capabilities. We are also
engaged in hemp-based CBD extraction technology including tolling
processing which converts hemp biomass to hemp extracts such as CBD
oil, distillate and isolate. We offer customers turnkey
manufacturing solutions in extraction services and end-to-end
processing systems. In addition, we own a laboratory testing
facility that provides us with a broad range of capabilities in
regard to formulation, quality control, and testing standards with
our CBD products, including potency analysis for our supply
partners of hemp derived CBD products.
We conduct our operations primarily in the U.S. For the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, approximately 15% and 14%,
respectively, of our revenues were derived from sales outside the
U.S.
Overview of Significant Events
Public Offering. Between
September and December 2019, we closed two tranches of our Series D
offering, pursuant to which we issued and sold a total of 578,898
shares of our 9.75% Series D preferred stock at a weighted average
price to the public of $24.05 per share, less underwriting
discounts and commissions, pursuant to the terms of the
underwriting agreement that we entered into with the Benchmark
Company, LLC (“Benchmark”) as representative of the
several underwriters. The 578,898 shares of Series D preferred
stock that were sold included 43,500 shares sold pursuant to the
overallotment option that we granted to the underwriters that was
exercised in full. In January 2020, the
Company issued an additional 11,375 shares of Series D preferred
stock upon the partial exercise by the
underwriters.
The Series D preferred stock was approved for listing on The Nasdaq
Capital Market under the symbol “YGYIP,” and had
commenced trading on Nasdaq September 20, 2019. The net proceeds
from this offering were approximately $12,269,000 after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses which were paid
by us. Trading in the Series D preferred stock was suspended on
Nasdaq on November 20, 2020, and on
February 2, 2021, the Series D preferred stock was removed from
listing on Nasdaq, effective at the opening of the trading session
on February 12, 2021. Our Series D preferred stock is now traded on
OTC Pink market under the same symbol YGYIP.
Stock Offerings. In February
2019, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with one
accredited investor that had a substantial pre-existing
relationship with us pursuant to which we sold 250,000 shares of
our common stock at an offering price of $7.00 per share. Pursuant
to the purchase agreement, we also issued to the investor a
three-year warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $7.00. We received proceeds of $1,750,000 from
the stock offering. Consulting fees for arranging the purchase
agreement include the issuance of 5,000 shares of restricted shares
of our common stock and a three-year warrant priced at $10.00 per
share convertible into 100,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock upon exercise. (See Note
10 to the consolidated financial statements.)
In June 2019, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with
one accredited investor that had a substantial pre-existing
relationship with us pursuant to which we sold 250,000 shares of
common stock at an offering price of $5.50 per share. We received
proceeds of $1,375,000 from the stock offering.
(See Note 10 to the consolidated
financial statements.)
At-the-Market Equity Offering Program. In January 2019, we entered into an
at-the-market offering agreement (the “ATM agreement”)
with Benchmark pursuant to which we may sell from time to time, at
our option, shares of our common stock through Benchmark, as sales
agent, for the sale of up to $60,000,000 of shares of our common
stock. We are not obligated to make any sales of common stock under
the ATM agreement and we cannot provide any assurances that we will
issue any shares pursuant to the ATM agreement. During the year
ended December 31, 2019, we received approximately $102,000 from
the sale of 17,524 shares of common stock under the ATM agreement.
We are not currently eligible to register the offer and sale of our
securities using a registration statement on Form S-3 and therefore
cannot make sales under the ATM agreement until such time as we
once again become S-3 eligible.
Convertible Notes. Between
February and July 2019, we closed five tranches related to the
January 2019 private placement debt offering, pursuant to which we
offered for sale up to $10,000,000 in principal amount of notes
(the “2019 PIPE Notes”), with each investor receiving
2,000 shares of common stock for each $100,000 invested. We entered
into subscription agreements with thirty-one accredited investors
that had a substantial pre-existing relationship with us pursuant
to which we received aggregate gross proceeds of $3,090,000 and
issued 2019 PIPE Notes in the aggregate principal amount of
$3,090,000 and an aggregate of 61,800 shares of common stock. The
placement agent received 15,450 shares of common stock for the
closed tranches as compensation. Each 2019 PIPE Note matures 24
months after issuance, bears interest at a rate of 6.00% per annum,
and the outstanding principal is convertible into shares of common
stock at any time after the 180th day anniversary of the issuance
of the 2019 PIPE Notes, at a conversion price of $10.00 per share,
subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends and
reclassification of the common stock. The 2019 PIPE Notes are secured by all equity in
KII. (See Note 7 & Note 14
to the consolidated financial statements.)
Promissory Notes. In March
2019, we entered into a two-year secured promissory note with two
accredited investors with whom we had a substantial pre-existing
relationship with and from whom we raised cash proceeds in the
aggregate of $2,000,000. The promissory notes are secured by all
equity in KII. In consideration of the promissory notes, we issued
20,000 shares of our common stock for each $1,000,000 invested as
well as for each $1,000,000 invested five-year warrants to purchase
20,000 shares of our common stock at a price per share of $6.00.
The promissory notes pay interest at a rate of 8.00% per annum and
interest is paid quarterly in arrears with all principal and unpaid
interest due at maturity on March 18, 2021. We issued in the aggregate 40,000 shares of common
stock and 40,000 warrants with the Notes. (See Note 6 & Note 14 to the consolidated
financial statements.)
In March 2020, we closed the initial tranche related to our March
2020 private placement debt offering, pursuant to offering up to an
aggregate of $5,000,000 in principal amount together with up to
250,000 shares of common stock with each investor receiving 50,000
shares of common stock for each $1,000,000 invested. On
March 20, 2020, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement
(“SPA”) with one accredited investor with whom
we had a substantial pre-existing
relationship, pursuant to which we issued a note in the
principal amount of $1,000,000, due December 31, 2020. The note matures 9 months after issuance and bears
interest at a rate of 18% per annum. In addition, we issued
50,000 shares of our common stock in connection with this Note.
(See Note 14 to the consolidated
financial statements.)
Small Business Administration – Paycheck Protection Program
Loan. In April 2020, our three
segments participated in the recent “The Coronavirus Aid,
Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”)”,
and the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) due to
losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We received cash in the
aggregate of $3,763,295 from qualified Small Business
Administrators (“SBA”) lenders. In addition, under the
SBA loans, our Direct Selling segment qualified for mortgage
assistance, whereby our corporate office’s mortgage has been
paid directly from the SBA lenders. We qualified for the mortgage
payment program for a period of six months. As of June 30, 2020,
the SBA has paid approximately $50,000 directly to our mortgage
holder. On November 5, 2020, KII received relief of $622,500
related its loan. On April 21, 2021, CLR received a second PPP loan
in the amount of $632,895, payable within 60 months if relief for
the loan is not granted.
We are in communication with the SBA lenders in regard to the
potential liability we will incur (if any) in respect for repayment
of the loans and consideration of any portion of loans forgiveness
of the debt.
H&H transactions
Mill Construction Agreement
In January 2019, to accommodate CLR's green coffee purchase
contract, CLR entered into an agreement with H&H and H&H
Export, Mr. Hernandez and Ms. Orozco, collectively referred to as
the Nicaraguan Partner, pursuant to which the Nicaraguan Partner
agreed to transfer the Matagalpa Property to be owned 50% by the
Nicaraguan Partner and 50% by CLR. In consideration for the land
acquisition we issued to H&H Export, 153,846 shares of common
stock. The fair value of the shares issued was $1,200,000 and was
based on the stock price on the date of issuance of the shares. In
addition, the Nicaraguan Partner and CLR agreed to contribute
$4,700,000 each toward construction of a processing plant, office,
and storage facilities on the Matagalpa Property for processing
coffee in Nicaragua. The addition of the mill will accommodate
CLR’s green coffee contract commitments. For the year ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, CLR made payments of $2,150,000 and
$900,000, respectively, towards the Matagalpa Mill project. At
December 31, 2019, CLR contributed a total of $3,050,000 towards
the Matagalpa Mill project, in addition $391,117 was paid for
operating equipment and the Nicaraguan Partner contributed a total
of $1,922,000. CLR’s remaining portion of $1,650,000 was paid
during 2020, including an additional $912,606 related to operating
equipment. As of the date of this filing, the Matagalpa Mill is in
construction and was not ready for full operations.
In January 2019, we issued 295,910 shares of our common stock to
H&H Export to pay for certain working capital, construction and
other payables. In connection with the issuance, we over issued
121,649 shares of common stock, resulting in the net issuance of
common stock to settle payables of 174,261 shares. H&H Export
agreed to reimburse CLR for the over issuance of the 121,649 shares
of common stock in cash. At December 31, 2019, the value of the
shares was approximately $397,000 based on the stock price at
December 31, 2019. Management has reviewed the amount due
and in conjunction with the impact of the underlying COVID crisis
and has determined that the receivable balance of $397,000, was
more than likely to be uncollected as of December 31, 2019, and
therefore the full amount was recognized as an allowance for
collectability at the end of December 31, 2019. (See Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements under “Other Related Party
Transactions” for further
discussion related to H&H Export.)
H&H Advance
In
December 2018, CLR advanced $5,000,000 to H&H Export to provide
services in support of a five-year contract for the sale and
processing of 41 million pounds of green coffee beans on an annual
basis. The services include providing hedging and financing
opportunities to producers and delivering harvested coffee to
CLR’s mills. In March 2019, this advance was converted
to a $5,000,000 loan agreement as a note receivable and bears
interest at 9.00% per annum and is due and payable by H&H
Export at the end of each year’s harvest season, but no later
than October 31 for any harvest year. In October 2019, CLR and
H&H Export amended the March 2019 agreement in terms of the
maturity date such that all outstanding principal and interest is
due and payable at the end of the 2020 harvest (or when the 2020
season’s harvest was exported and collected), but never to be
later than November 30, 2020. Management reviewed the security against the loan
and the impact of the underlying COVID crisis and determined that
the full amount of the note receivable including interest of
approximately $5,340,000, was not collected as of December 31,
2020, and therefore $5,340,000 was recognized as an allowance for
collectability at the end of December 31, 2019. (See Note 3
to the consolidated financial statements under “Other Related Party
Transactions” for further
discussion related to H&H Export.)
Amendment to Operating and Profit-Sharing Agreement
In January 2019, CLR entered into an amendment to the March 2014
operating and profit-sharing agreement with the owners of
H&H Export. In addition, CLR and H&H Export, Mr. Hernandez
and Ms. Orozco have restructured their profit-sharing agreement in
regard to profits from green coffee sales and processing that
increased CLR’s profit participation by an additional 25%.
Under the new terms of the agreement with respect to profit
generated from green coffee sales and processed from La Pita, a
leased mill, or the Matagalpa Mill, now will provide for a split of
profits of 75% to CLR and 25% to the Nicaraguan Partner, after
certain conditions are met. In addition, H&H Export has sold to
CLR its espresso brand Café Cachita in consideration of the
issuance of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The
shares of common stock issued were valued at $7.50 per share.
Profit-sharing expense for the year ended December 31, 2019
was $1,060,000
compared to a profit-sharing benefit of $910,000 in the same period last year, which is
recorded in accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets at
each respective year.
Joint Venture Agreement in Nicaragua for Hemp Processing Center
between the CLR and KII and Nicaraguan partner
On April 20 and July 29, 2020, CLR and KII (the “U.S.
Partners”) entered into agreements (“Hemp Joint Venture
Agreement”) with H&H Export and Fitracomex, Inc. (“Fitracomex”)
(collectively “The Nicaraguan Partners”) and
established the Hemp Joint Venture (the “Nicaraguan Hemp Grow
and Extractions Group” or the “Hemp Joint
Venture”).
The
agreement calls for H&H Export to contribute the 2,200-acre
Chaguitillo Farms in Sebaco-Matagalpa, Nicaragua which will be
owned by H&H Export and the U.S. Partners on a 50/50 basis
separate from the Hemp Joint Venture.
The
agreement calls for Nicaraguan Partners to contribute the
excavation and preparation for hemp growth of the 2,200 acres,
installation of electrical service, and the construction of 45,000
square feet of buildings to be used for office, processing,
storage, drying and green house space.
The
U.S. Partners will contribute all the necessary extraction
equipment to convert hemp to crude oil and will also provide the
feminized hemp seeds for the pilot grow program, along with their expertise in the hemp
business. The U.S. Partners will also provide all necessary
working capital as required.
Additionally,
we agreed, subject to the approval of The Nasdaq Stock Market
(“Nasdaq”) to issue 1,500,000 shares of our restricted
common stock, $0.001 par value, to Fitracomex. In accordance with
the Hemp Joint Venture Agreement, in July 2020 we issued to
Fitracomex the agreed upon shares of restricted common stock. We
also agreed to issue warrants to Fitracomex for the purchase
5,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of US
$1.50, exercisable for a term of five (5) years after completion
of the construction and upon the
approval by our stockholders of the proposed issuance. In
addition, we agreed to use our best efforts to register the
resale of the shares of our common stock issued to Fitracomex under
the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"),
and make any necessary applications with Nasdaq to list the
shares.
The
U.S. Partners and H&H Export will serve as the managing
partners with all business decisions will require prior consent and
agreement of both parties. The Net Profits and Net Losses for each
fiscal period shall be allocated among the partners as follows:
twenty five percent (25%) to the Nicaraguan Partners and seventy
five percent (75%) to the U.S. Partners.
Acquisitions During the Years Ended 2019 and 2018
In
November 2019, we acquired certain assets of BeneYOU. BeneYOU is a nutritional and beauty product
company that brings customers and distributors of brands of
Jamberry which offers a line of nail products, the brand Avisae
which focuses on gut health and the brand M.Global which delivers
hydration products. (See Note 2
to the consolidated financial statements.)
In February 2019, KII acquired substantially all the assets of
Khrysos Global and all the outstanding equity of INXL and INXH. The
collective business manufactures proprietary systems to provide
end-to-end extraction and processing that allow for the conversion
of hemp feed stock into hemp oil and hemp
extracts. (See
Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements.)
In
March 2018, we acquired certain assets of ViaViente. ViaViente is
the distributor of The ViaViente
Miracle, a highly concentrated, energizing whole fruit puree
blend that is rich in antioxidants and naturally occurring vitamins
and minerals. (See Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements.)
In
February 2018, we acquired certain assets and certain liabilities
of Nature Direct. Nature Direct, is a manufacturer and distributor
of essential oil based nontoxic cleaning and care products for
personal, home and professional use. (See Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements.)
Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared and presented on a basis assuming we will continue as a
going concern. At December 31, 2019, we had a significant
accumulated deficit and we have experienced significant losses and
incurred negative cash flows for the last few years. Net cash used
in operating activities was $14,337,000 and $12,352,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Our cash and
cash equivalents totaled $4,463,000 at December 31, 2019. We do not
currently believe that our existing cash resources are sufficient
to meet our anticipated needs over the next twelve months from the
date hereof. Based on our current cash levels and our current rate
of cash requirements, we will need to raise additional capital
and/or will need to further reduce our expenses from current
levels. Our independent registered public accounting firm has
issued a report that includes an explanatory paragraph referring to
our recurring losses from operations (anticipated continued losses
in the future) and net capital deficiency that raise substantial
doubt in our ability to continue as a going concern without
additional capital becoming available.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations are based upon financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an
on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates; including those related
to collection of receivables, inventory obsolescence, sales returns
and non-monetary transactions such as stock and stock options
issued for services, deferred taxes and related valuation
allowances, fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in
business combinations, asset impairments, useful lives of property,
equipment and intangible assets and value of contingent acquisition
debt. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies
affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue from product sales when the following five
steps are completed: i) Identify the contract with the customer;
ii) Identify the performance obligations in the contract; iii)
Determine the transaction price; iv) Allocate the transaction price
to the performance obligations in the contract; and v) Recognize
revenue when (or as) each performance obligation is satisfied. (See
Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.)
We ship the majority of our direct selling segment products
directly to the distributors primarily via UPS, USPS or FedEx and
receives substantially all payments for these sales in the form of
credit card transactions. We regularly monitor our use of credit
card or merchant services to ensure that its financial risk related
to credit quality and credit concentrations is actively managed.
Revenue is recognized upon passage of title and risk of loss to
customers when product is shipped from the fulfillment facility. We
ship the majority of our commercial coffee segment and commercial
hemp segment products via common carrier and invoice our customers
for the products. Revenue is recognized when the title and risk of
loss is passed to the customer under the terms of the shipping
arrangement, typically, FOB shipping point. In addition, our commercial coffee segment records
revenue at net for providing milling services of green coffee beans
at the CLR mill. Our commercial hemp segment records revenue also
related to lab testing services which are billed upon release of
results or delivery of product.
Sales revenue and a reserve for estimated returns are recorded net
of sales tax.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Certain of our financial instruments including cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses,
accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred revenue are
carried at cost, which is considered to be representative of their
respective fair values because of the short-term nature of these
instruments. Our notes payable and derivative liabilities are
carried at estimated fair value. (See Note 9 to the consolidated
financial statements.)
Derivative Financial Instruments
We do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash
flow, market or foreign currency.
We review the terms of convertible debt and equity instruments we
issue to determine whether there are derivative instruments,
including an embedded conversion option that is required to be
bifurcated and accounted for separately as a derivative financial
instrument. In circumstances where a host instrument contains more
than one embedded derivative instrument, including a conversion
option, that is required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated
derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound
derivative instrument. Also, in connection with the sale of
convertible debt and equity instruments, we may issue freestanding
warrants that may, depending on their terms, be accounted for as
derivative instrument liabilities, rather than as
equity.
Derivative instruments are initially recorded at fair value and are
then revalued at each reporting date with changes in the fair value
reported as non-operating income or expense. When the convertible
debt or equity instruments contain embedded derivative instruments
that are to be bifurcated and accounted for as liabilities, the
total proceeds allocated to the convertible host instruments are
first allocated to the fair value of all the bifurcated derivative
instruments. The remaining proceeds, if any, are then allocated to
the convertible instruments themselves, usually resulting in those
instruments being recorded at a discount from their face value.
(See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.)
The discount from the face value of the convertible debt, together
with the stated interest on the instrument, is amortized over the
life of the instrument through periodic charges to interest
expense, using the effective interest method.
Inventory and Cost of Revenues
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value.
Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. We record
an inventory reserve for estimated excess and obsolete inventory
based upon historical turnover, market conditions and assumptions
about future demand for its products. When applicable, expiration
dates of certain inventory items with a definite life are taken
into consideration.
Cost of revenues includes the cost of inventory, shipping and
handling costs incurred in connection with shipments to customers,
direct labor and benefits costs, royalties associated with certain
products, transaction merchant fees and depreciation on certain
assets.
Operating and Financing Leases
The Company leases certain office space, warehouses, distribution
centers, manufacturing centers, and equipment. A contract is or
contains a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the
use of identified property, plant, or equipment (an identified
asset) for a period of time in exchange for
consideration.
In general, the Company’s leases include one or more options
to renew, with renewal terms that generally vary from one to ten
years. The exercise of lease renewal options is generally at the
Company’s sole discretion. The depreciable life of assets and
leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term,
unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably
certain of exercise.
The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material
residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. Leases
with an initial term of twelve months or less are not
recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance
sheets, and the Company does not separate non-lease components from
lease components. Lease cost is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the lease term.
Finance lease right-of-use assets are amortized over their
estimated useful lives, as the Company does believe that it is
reasonably certain that options which transfer ownership will be
exercised. In general, for the majority of the Company’s
material leases, the renewal options are not included in the
calculation of its right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, as
the Company does not believe that it is reasonably certain that
these renewal options will be exercised. Periodically, the Company
assesses its leases to determine whether it is reasonably certain
that these options and any renewal options could be reasonably
expected to be exercised.
The majority of the Company’s leases are for real estate and
equipment. In general, the individual lease contracts do not
provide information about the rate implicit in the lease. Because
the Company is not able to determine the rate implicit in its
leases, it instead generally uses its incremental borrowing rate to
determine the present value of lease liabilities. In determining
its incremental borrowing rate, the Company reviewed the terms of
its leases, its senior secured credit facility, swap rates, and
other factors.
Business Combinations
We account for business combinations under the acquisition method
and allocate the total purchase price for acquired businesses to
the tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values. When a
business combination includes the exchange of our common stock, the
value of the common stock is determined using the closing market
price at the date such shares were tendered to the selling parties.
The fair values assigned to tangible and identified intangible
assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management or
third-party estimates and assumptions that utilize established
valuation techniques appropriate for our industry and each acquired
business. Goodwill is recorded as the excess, if any, of the
aggregate fair value of consideration exchanged for an acquired
business over the fair value (measured at the acquisition date) of
total net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired. A
liability for contingent consideration, if applicable, is recorded
at fair value at the acquisition date. In determining the fair
value of such contingent consideration, management estimates the
amount to be paid based on probable outcomes and expectations on
financial performance of the related acquired business. The fair
value of contingent consideration is reassessed quarterly, with any
change in the estimated value charged to operations in the period
of the change. Increases or decreases in the fair value of the
contingent consideration obligations can result from changes in
actual or estimated revenue streams, discount periods, discount
rates, and probabilities that contingencies will be
met.
Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, including property and equipment and definite
lived intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated
amortization. Costs incurred to renew or extend the life of a
long-lived asset are reviewed for capitalization. All finite-lived
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis, which
approximates the pattern in which the estimated economic benefits
of the assets are realized, over their estimated useful lives. We
evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate their net book value may not be
recoverable. We first consider whether indicators of impairment are
present. If indicators are present, we perform a recoverability
test by comparing the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash
flows attributable to the asset (group) in question to its carrying
amount (as a reminder, entities cannot record an impairment for a
held and used asset unless the asset first fails this
recoverability test). If the undiscounted cash flows used in the test
for recoverability are less than the long-lived assets
(group’s) carrying amount, we then determine the fair value
of the long- lived asset (group) and recognize an impairment loss,
if any, if the carrying amount of the long-lived asset (group)
exceeds its fair value. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we
recorded a loss on impairment of intangible assets related to our
acquisitions of BeautiControl, Inc. and Future Global Vision, Inc.
and recorded a loss on impairment of intangible assets of
approximately $2,550,000 and $625,000, respectively. While these
charges had no impact on our business operations, cash balances or
operating cash flows, they resulted in significant losses during
the reporting periods. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we
determined that there were indicators of impairment present for
long-lived assets related to our commercial hemp segment, as result
a test for recoverability concluded that the carrying amount of the
long-lived asset (group) did not exceed its fair value. As a
result, we recorded a loss on impairment of intangible assets
related to our acquisition of Khrysos Global of approximately
$8,461,000. (See Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements.)
Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded as the excess, if any, of the aggregate fair
value of consideration exchanged for an acquired business over the
fair value (measured at the acquisition date) of total net tangible
and identified intangible assets acquired. Goodwill and other
intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but are
tested for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these
assets may not be recoverable. We first assess qualitative
factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the
quantitative goodwill impairment test. If the qualitative
assessment determines it is necessary, we will perform a
quantitative impairment test shall be used to identify goodwill
impairment and measure the amount of a goodwill impairment loss to
be recognized (if any). We determined
no impairment of our goodwill occurred for the year ended December
31, 2018.
At the end of 2019 the qualitative testing determined that a
quantitative test was not required for our direct selling segment
and our commercial coffee segment. The quantitative testing for our
commercial hemp segment led us recognizing a loss on impairment of
goodwill of $6,831,000.
Stock-based Compensation
We
account for stock-based compensation in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards
Board ("ASC") Topic 718, Compensation – Stock
Compensation, which establishes accounting for equity instruments
exchanged for employee services. Under such provisions, stock-based
compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the
calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an
expense, under the straight-line method, over the vesting period of
the equity grant. Forfeitures are recorded as they occur. The
Company uses the Black-Scholes to estimate the fair value of stock
options. The use of a valuation model requires the Company to make
certain assumptions with respect to selected model inputs. Expected
volatility is calculated based on the historical volatility of the
Company’s stock price over the expected term of the option.
The expected life is based on the contractual life of the option
and expected employee exercise and post-vesting employment
termination behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S.
Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the
expected life assumed at the date of the grant.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method
which includes the recognition of deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that
have been included in the consolidated financial statements. Under
this approach, deferred taxes are recorded for the future tax
consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities are recovered or paid. The provision for income
taxes represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year
plus the change in deferred taxes during the year. Deferred taxes
result from differences between the financial statement and tax
bases of our assets and liabilities and are adjusted for changes in
tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. The effects of
future changes in income tax laws or rates are not
anticipated.
Results of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2019 compared to year ended December 31,
2018
Revenues
For the year ended December 31, 2019, our revenues decreased
approximately $15,003,000 to
$147,442,000 as compared $162,445,000 for the year ended December
31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we derived
86.1% of our revenues from our direct sales, 13.3% of revenues from
our commercial coffee sales and 0.6% of our revenues from our
commercial hemp sales. During the year ended December 31,
2018, we derived 85.5% of our revenues from our direct sales and
14.5% of our revenues from our commercial coffee
sales.
Revenues
in the direct selling segment decreased by approximately $11,844,000 to $127,011,000
as compared to $138,855,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018.
This decrease was attributed to a decrease of $14,255,000 in
revenues from existing business, partially offset by revenues from
new acquisitions of $2,411,000. The decrease in existing business
was primarily due to a decline in the number of ordering preferred
customers, partially offset by an increase in distributor
revenues.
Revenues in the commercial coffee segment decreased by approximately $4,046,000 to $19,544,000 as
compared to $23,590,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018. This
decrease was attributed to a decrease in our green coffee business
of $4,819,000 primarily driven by the shift in revenue away from
green coffee sales to revenues related to mill processing services
that were partially offset by increased revenues of $773,000 from
our roasted coffee business. For the year ended
December 31, 2019, CLR recorded revenues from green coffee milling
and processing services of $6,416,000 to H&H Export; with the
related green coffee to be resold by H&H Export. Additionally,
we recorded revenue from the sale of processed green coffee of
$1,046,000.
CLR recorded net revenues from processed green coffee of
approximately $12,281,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018, of
which $3,938,000 was to H&H Export, to be resold by H&H
Export. Revenues in roasted coffee increased 6.8% to $12,082,000
for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Revenue
in the commercial hemp segment from our Khrysos Global acquisition
were approximately
$887,000.
The following table summarizes our revenue by segment (in
thousands):
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
Percentage
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Change (1)
|
Direct
selling
|
$127,011
|
$138,855
|
(8.5)%
|
As a % of Revenue
|
86.1%
|
85.5%
|
(0.6)%
|
Commercial
coffee:
|
|
|
|
Processed
green coffee
|
1,046
|
12,281
|
(91.5)%
|
As a % of Segment Revenue
|
5.4%
|
52.1%
|
(46.7)%
|
Milling
and processing services
|
6,416
|
-
|
N/A
|
As a % of Segment Revenue
|
32.8%
|
-%
|
N/A
|
Roasted
coffee and other
|
12,082
|
11,309
|
6.8%
|
As a % of Segment Revenue
|
61.8%
|
47.9%
|
13.9%
|
Commercial
coffee - total
|
19,544
|
23,590
|
(17.2)%
|
As a % of Revenue
|
13.3%
|
14.5%
|
(1.2)%
|
Commercial
hemp
|
887
|
-
|
N/A
|
As a % of Revenue
|
0.6%
|
-%
|
N/A
|
Total
Revenues
|
$147,442
|
$162,445
|
(9.2)%
|
(1)
Percentages denoted
as N/A do not contain prior period comparatives
Cost of Revenues
For the year ended December 31, 2019, cost of revenues decreased
approximately $13,931,000 or 20.7% to $53,482,000 as compared to $67,413,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2018.
Cost of revenues in the direct selling segment decreased by
approximately $3,094,000
or 7.0% to
$40,851,000 when compared to
the same period last year, primarily due to the
decrease in revenues discussed above, partially offset by an
increase in inventory adjustments to increase the inventory
reserve.
Cost of revenues in the commercial coffee segment decreased by
approximately $12,132,000
or 51.7% to $11,336,000 when
compared to the same period last year, primarily due to the
shift in revenue to milling and processing services for 2019 when
compared to 2018. As revenue for milling services does not contain
a cost of goods sold component, this shift in revenue from green
coffee processed sales to milling and processing services lowers
our cost of revenue. Cost of revenues for
processed green coffee the year ended December 31, 2019 was credit
of $754,000 as a result of a pricing adjustment related to a price
per pound settlement. During the year ended December 31, 2018, cost
of revenues for processed green coffee sales were $11,747,000. Cost
of revenues for roasted coffee sales the year ended December 31,
2019 increased 3.1% to approximately $12,090,000 compared to
$11,721,000 during the year ended December 31,
2018.
Cost of revenues in the commercial hemp segment from our Khrysos
Global acquisition was approximately $1,295,000.
Gross Profit (Loss)
For the year ended December 31, 2019, gross profit decreased
approximately $1,072,000 or 1.1% to $93,960,000 as compared to
$95,032,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018. Gross profit as a
percentage of revenues increased to 63.7% compared to 58.5% in the
same period last year.
Gross profit in the direct selling segment decreased by
approximately $8,750,000
or 9.2% to $86,160,000 when
compared to the same period last year, primarily as a result
of the decrease in revenues discussed above and the increase in
inventory adjustments to increase the inventory reserve.
Gross profit as a percentage of
revenues in the direct selling segment decreased to
67.8% compared to 68.4% in the same
period last year.
Gross profit in the commercial coffee segment increased by
approximately $8,086,000 to $8,208,000 when compared to the same
period last year. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues in the
commercial coffee segment increased to 42.0% for the year ended
December 31, 2019, compared to 0.5% in the same period last year.
The increase in gross profit in the commercial coffee segment was
primarily due to the overall increase in the processing and milling
of unprocessed green coffee that in turn drove higher gross profits
from the combination of processed green coffee sales and revenues
on milling and processing
services during the year ended
December 31, 2019, offset by the gross loss in the roasted coffee.
Gross profit from the sales of processed green coffee was
$1,800,000 and $534,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019 and
2018, respectively. Gross profits from milling and processing
services was $6,416,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019.
During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recognized a
loss related to roasted coffee of $8,000 and $412,000,
respectively.
Gross loss in the commercial hemp segment from our Khrysos Global
acquisition was approximately $408,000. Gross loss as a percentage of revenues in the
commercial hemp segment was 46.0%.
Below is a table of gross profit (loss) by segment (in thousands)
and gross profit (loss) as a percentage of segment
revenues:
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
Percentage
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Change (1)
|
Direct
selling
|
$86,160
|
$94,910
|
(9.2)%
|
Gross Profit % of Segment Revenues
|
67.8%
|
68.4%
|
(0.6)%
|
Commercial
coffee:
|
|
|
|
Processed
green coffee
|
1,800
|
534
|
237.1%
|
Gross Profit % of Segment Revenues
|
9.2%
|
2.3%
|
6.9%
|
Milling
and processing services
|
6,416
|
-
|
N/A
|
Gross Profit % of Segment Revenues
|
32.8%
|
-%
|
N/A
|
Roasted
coffee and other
|
(8)
|
(412)
|
(98.1)%
|
Gross Profit % of Segment Revenues
|
(0.0)%
|
(1.7)%
|
1.7%
|
Commercial
coffee - total
|
8,208
|
122
|
6,627.9%
|
Gross Profit % of Segment Revenues
|
42.0%
|
0.5%
|
41.5%
|
Commercial
hemp
|
(408)
|
-
|
N/A
|
Gross Profit % of Segment Revenues
|
(46.0)%
|
-%
|
N/A
|
Total
|
$93,960
|
$95,032
|
(1.1)%
|
Gross Profit % of Revenues
|
63.7%
|
58.5%
|
5.2%
|
(1)
Percentages denoted
as N/A do not contain prior period comparatives
Operating Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2019, our operating expenses
increased by approximately $50,078,000 or 51.3% to $147,747,000 as compared to $97,669,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase included
$12,892,000 in stock and equity-based compensation expense that was
recorded in the first quarter of 2019 for options granted that were
fully vested at the time of issuance when compared to the prior
year that did not have such grants. Excluding the effect of stock
and equity-based compensation expense in the first quarter of 2019,
operating expenses would have increased by 35.1%.
Distributor Compensation
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the distributor compensation
paid to our independent distributors in the direct selling segment
decreased by approximately $4,599,000
or 7.5% to $56,488,000 as
compared to $61,087,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2018. This decrease was
primarily attributable to the decrease in revenues.
Distributor compensation as a
percentage of direct selling revenues increased to
44.5% as compared to 44.0% for the
year ended December 31, 2018.
Sales and Marketing
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the sales and marketing
expense increased by approximately $769,000 or
5.7% to $14,167,000 as compared
to $13,398,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The
increase included $471,000 in stock and equity-based compensation
expense that was recorded in the first quarter of 2019 for options
granted that were fully vested at the time of issuance when
compared to the prior year that did not have such grants. Excluding
the effect of stock and equity-based compensation expense in the
first quarter of 2019, sales and marketing expense would have
increased by 2.2%.
Sales and marketing expenses in the direct selling segment
increased by approximately $363,000
or 2.9% to $12,823,000 as
compared to $12,460,000 for the same period last year.
The
increase included $471,000 in stock and equity-based compensation
expense that was recorded in the first quarter of 2019 for options
granted that were fully vested at the time of issuance when
compared to the prior year that did not have such grants. Excluding
the effect of stock and equity-based compensation expense in the
first quarter of 2019, sales and marketing expense
in the direct selling segment
would have
decreased by 0.9%.
Sales and marketing expenses in the commercial coffee segment
increased by approximately $180,000 or
19.2% to $1,118,000 as compared
to $938,000 for the same period last year, primarily due to
increased advertising costs and compensation
expense.
Sales and marketing expenses in the commercial hemp segment were
approximately $226,000 for
the year ended
December 31,
2019.
General and Administrative
For the year ended December 31, 2019, general and administrative expenses increased by
approximately $39,616,000 or
208.9% to $61,800,000 from $20,009,000 for the year ended December
31, 2018. The increase included
$12,421,000 in stock and equity-based compensation expense that was
recorded in the first quarter of 2019. Excluding the effect of this
stock and equity-based compensation expense in the first quarter of
2019, general and administrative expense would have increased
by 146.8%.
General and administrative expenses in the direct selling segment
increased approximately $20,226,000 or 122.9 to $36,680,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared
to $16,454,000 for the same period last year. These increases were
primarily the result of increases in accounting and computer
consulting costs and costs associated with the contingent liability
revaluation of $6,937,000. Other increases included $10,996,000 in
stock and equity-based compensation expense that was recorded in
the first quarter of 2019 for options granted that were fully
vested at the time of issuance when compared to the prior year that
did not have such grants. Excluding the effect of stock and
equity-based compensation expense in the first quarter of 2019,
general and administrative expenses in the direct selling segment would have increased
by 56.1%. For the year ended
December 31, 2018, the contingent debt revaluation adjustment included
gains of $2,520,000 related to the revaluation our acquisition of
BeautiControl, Inc. and $1,246,000 related to the elimination of
the contingent liability associated with our acquisition of
Nature’s Pearl Corporation due to breach of the asset
purchase agreement by the seller.
General and administrative expenses in the commercial coffee
segment increased by approximately $17,469,000 or 491.4% to $21,024,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2019 as compared to $3,555,000 for the same period last year.
This
increase included $1,425,000 in stock and equity-based compensation
expense that was recorded in the first quarter of 2019. Excluding
the effect of stock and equity-based compensation expense recorded
in the first quarter of 2019, general and administration expense in
the commercial coffee segment would have increased by
451.3%.
Also contributing was the increase in profit-sharing expense of $1,970,000
as well as higher wages and warehouse storage costs in 2019
compared to the same period last year.
At December 31, 2019 CLR's accounts receivable balance for customer
related revenue by H&H Export were approximately $8,707,000, of
which the full amount was past due at December 31, 2019. As a
result, the Company has reserved $7,871,000 as bad debt related to
this accounts receivable which is net of collections through
December 31, 2020. (See Note 3
to the consolidated financial statements under “Other Related Party
Transactions” for further
discussion related to H&H Export.)
In
addition, CLR recorded a reserve against an outstanding receivable
due from Alain Hernandez related to the over issuance of shares
against the amounts payable. Management has reviewed the amount due
and in conjunction with the impact of the underlying COVID crisis
and has determined that the net amount of the amount receivable for
$397,000, is more than likely to be uncollected as of December 31,
2019, and therefore approximately $397,000 has been recognized as
an allowance for collectability at the end of December 31, 2019.
(See Note 3 to the consolidated
financial statements under “Other Related Party
Transactions” for further
discussion related to H&H Export.)
In
December 2018, CLR advanced $5,000,000 to H&H Export to provide
services in support of a five-year contract for the sale and
processing of green coffee beans. In March 2019, this advance was
converted to a $5,000,000 loan agreement as a note receivable.
Management reviewed the security
against the loan and the impact of the underlying COVID crisis and
determined that the full amount of the note receivable including
interest of approximately $5,340,000, was not collected as of
December 31, 2020, and therefore $5,340,000 was recognized as an
allowance for collectability at the end of December 31,
2019. (See Note 3 to the
consolidated financial statements under “Other Related Party
Transactions” for further
discussion related to H&H Export.)
General and administrative expense in the commercial hemp segment
from our Khrysos Global acquisition was approximately $4,096,000 and was primarily
related to wages and general office costs.
Loss on Impairment of Intangible Assets
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a loss on
impairment of intangible assets related to our acquisition of
Khrysos Global of approximately $8,461,000. (See Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements.)
For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded a loss on
impairment of intangible assets related to our acquisitions of
BeautiControl, Inc. and Future Global Vision, Inc. and recorded a
loss on impairment of intangible assets of approximately $2,550,000
and $625,000, respectively. (See Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements.)
Loss on Impairment of Goodwill
During the fourth quarter of 2019, we recorded a loss on impairment
of goodwill of $6,831,000 related to the commercial hemp
segment. The impairment was driven by a decline in the
estimated fair value primarily due to the reduction in the
profitability forecasts, as well as increased working capital
requirements which increased its carrying value. (See Note 2 &
Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.)
Operating Loss
For the year ended December 31, 2019, our operating loss increased
by approximately $51,150,000 to
an operating loss of $53,787,000 as compared to $2,637,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in our operating loss
included $12,892,000 in stock and equity-based compensation expense
recorded in the first quarter of 2019 as discussed above under
operating expenses. Excluding the effect of stock and equity-based
compensation expense in the first quarter of
2019, the operating loss would
have been $40,821,000 or an increase of $36,009,000 compared to the
same period last year which was primarily due to the lower revenue
and higher operating expenses including the loss on impairment of
goodwill and intangible assets as discussed
above.
Total Other Income (Expenses), Net
For the year ended December 31, 2019, total net other income was
approximately $1,808,000 as compared to net other expense of
$17,017,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in
net other income of $18,825,000 was due to the increase in the
change in the fair value of derivative liabilities, the decrease in
net interest expense, the loss on the modification of warrants
recorded in 2019 and the loss on induced debt conversion and the
extinguishment loss on debt recorded in 2018.
The change in fair value of derivative liabilities increased by
approximately $10,147,000 to
$5,502,000 in other income for
the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $4,645,000 in other
expense for the year ended December 31, 2018. Various factors are
considered in the pricing models we use to value the warrants
including our current stock price, the remaining life of the
warrants, the volatility of our stock price, and the risk-free
interest rate. Future changes in these factors may have a
significant impact on the computed fair value of our derivative
liabilities. As such, we expect future changes in the fair value of
the warrants and may vary significantly from period to period. (See
Note 8 & Note 9 to the consolidated financial
statements.)
Net interest expense decreased by approximately $3,766,000
for the year ended December 31, 2019
to $2,818,000 compared to $6,584,000 for the year ended December
31, 2018.
Interest expense the year ended
December 31, 2019 included: (i)
interest payments to investors associated with our private
placements and debt transactions, (ii) interest payments related to
our Crestmark agreement, (iii) interest payments related to our short-term
note, and (iv) interest paid
for other operating debt. Non-cash interest of amortization expense
and other non-cash interest, offset by interest
income.
Interest expense in 2018 included: (i) interest payments related to
investors associated with our private placement transactions, (ii)
interest payments related to our short-term note, (iii) interest
payments related to our Crestmark agreement and, (iv) interest paid
for other operating debt. Non-cash interest includes amortization
expense and other non-cash interest, offset by interest
income.
During
the year ended December 31,
2019, we recorded a loss on modification of warrants of
approximately $876,000 related
to warrant modifications from
inducement of shares and the change in the terms of the warrants.
(See Note 10 to the consolidated
financial statements.)
During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded a non-cash
loss on an induced debt conversion as a result of an exchange of
debt for common stock. An investor in our 2014 private placement
exchanged their 2014 PIPE Note with a principal balance of
$4,000,000 for 747,664 shares of common stock in October 2018. We
concluded that the 2014 PIPE Note should be recognized as a debt
modification for an induced conversion of convertible debt and we
recognized all remaining unamortized discounts of approximately
$679,000 immediately subsequent to October 2018 as interest expense
and recorded a loss on the debt exchange in the amount of
$4,706,000 with the corresponding entry through equity. (See Note 7
to the consolidated financial statements.)
During 2018, we also recorded a non-cash extinguishment loss on
debt of approximately $1,082,000 as a result of the triggering of the
automatic conversion of the 2017 PIPE Notes associated with our
2017 private placement to common stock. This loss represents the
difference between the carrying value of the 2017 PIPE Notes and
embedded conversion feature and the fair value of the shares that
were issued. The fair value of the shares issued was based on the
stock price on the date of the conversion. (See Note 7 to the
consolidated financial statements.)
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and
tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using statutory tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities from a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the effective date of the
change. At December 31, 2019, we have evaluated the realizability
of the deferred tax asset, based upon achieved and estimated future
results and through consideration of all positive and negative
evidences and have determined that it is more likely than not that
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. A valuation allowance
remains on the U.S. state and foreign tax attributes that are
likely to expire before realization. We have approximately $75,000
in refundable credits, and expects that a substantial portion will
be refunded between 2020 and 2021. As such, we do not have a
valuation allowance relating to the refundable AMT credit
carryforward.
We recognized an income tax provision of approximately
$9,000 which was our estimated
federal, state and foreign income tax expense for the year ended
December 31, 2019 compared to an income tax provision of $416,000
for the year ended December 31, 2018. The difference between the
effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate of 21% was due to
the permanent differences, change in valuation allowance,
state taxes (net of federal benefit), and foreign tax rate
differential.
Net Loss
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company
reported a net loss of approximately $51,988,000 and $20,070,000,
respectively. The increase in net
loss of $31,918,000 when compared to the prior period was due to
the increase in operating loss of $48,975,000, partially offset by
the decrease in net other expense of $16,650,000 and a decrease in
the income tax provision of $407,000 as discussed
above.
Adjusted EBITDA
EBITDA (earnings or loss before interest, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization) as adjusted to remove the effect of
stock-based compensation expense, equity-based compensation
expense, amortization of debt discount and issuance costs, the
change in the fair value of the derivatives, the loss on the
modification of warrants, the loss on impairment of goodwill, the
loss on impairment of intangible assets, the loss on
induced debt conversion, the loss on induced debt conversion,
and the loss on extinguishment of debt or "Adjusted EBITDA."
Adjusted EBITDA was a loss of approximately $15,447,000
for the year ended
December 31, 2019 compared to $7,013,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2018.
Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA, when viewed with our
results under GAAP and the accompanying reconciliations, provides
useful information about our period-over-period results. Adjusted
EBITDA is presented because management believes it provides
additional information with respect to the performance of our
fundamental business activities and is also frequently used by
securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the
evaluation of comparable companies. We also rely on Adjusted EBITDA
as a primary measure to review and assess the operating performance
of our company and our management team.
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. We calculate
adjusted EBITDA by taking net income, and adding back the expenses
related to interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization,
stock-based compensation expense, equity-based compensation
expense, amortization of debt discount and issuance costs, change
in the fair value of the warrant derivative, loss on modification
of warrants, loss on impairment of goodwill, loss on impairment of
intangible assets, loss on induced debt conversion, and loss on
extinguishment of debt, and as each of those elements are
calculated in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA
should not be construed as a substitute for net income (loss) (as
determined in accordance with GAAP) for the purpose of analyzing
our operating performance or financial position, as Adjusted EBITDA
is not defined by GAAP.
A reconciliation of our adjusted EBITDA to net loss is included in
the table below (in thousands):
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Net
loss
|
$(51,988)
|
$(20,070)
|
Add/Subtract:
|
|
|
Interest,
net
|
2,818
|
6,584
|
Income
tax provision
|
9
|
416
|
Depreciation
|
2,134
|
1,819
|
Amortization
|
2,401
|
2,879
|
EBITDA
|
(44,626)
|
(8,372)
|
Add/Subtract:
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
12,697
|
1,453
|
Equity-based
compensation and amortization of issuance costs
|
4,597
|
324
|
Amortization
of debt discounts and issuance costs
|
1,219
|
-
|
Change
in the fair value of warrant derivatives
|
(5,502)
|
4,645
|
Loss
on modification of warrants
|
876
|
–
|
Loss
on impairment of goodwill
|
6,831
|
–
|
Loss
on impairment of intangible assets
|
8,461
|
3,175
|
Loss
on induced debt conversion
|
–
|
4,706
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
–
|
1,082
|
Adjusted
EBITDA
|
$(15,447)
|
$7,013
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
At December 31, 2019 we had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $4,463,000 as
compared to cash and cash equivalents of $2,879,000 at December 31,
2018.
Cash Flows
Cash used in operating activities. Net cash used in operating activities for the
year ended December 31, 2019 was approximately $14,337,000
as compared to $12,352,000 for the year ended December 31,
2018. Net cash used in operating activities in 2019 consisted of a
net loss of $51,988,000 and $10,339,000 in changes in operating
assets and liabilities, partially offset by net non-cash operating
activity of $47,990,000. Net cash used in operating activities in
2018 consisted of a net loss of approximately $20,070,000 and
$9,434,000 in changes in operating assets and
liabilities, partially offset by net non-cash operating
activity of $17,152,000.
Net non-cash operating expenses in 2019 included
approximately
$4,535,000
in depreciation and amortization, $12,697,000 in stock-based
compensation expense, $4,597,000 in equity-based compensation for
services, $876,000 loss on warrant
modification, $1,219,000 in amortization of debt discounts and
issuance costs, $1,141,000 in increase in inventory reserves,
$73,000 in deferred income taxes, $8,005,000 in increase in
allowance for accounts receivable, $8,461,000 related to the loss on impairment of
intangible assets, $6,831,000 related to the loss on impairment of
goodwill, $5,737,000 related to an allowance for notes and
other receivable and $1,158,000 related to noncash operating
leases partially offset by
$5,502,000 related to the
change in fair value of warrant derivative liability and
$1,838,000 related to the
change in fair value of contingent acquisition
debt.
Net non-cash operating expenses in 2018 included approximately
$4,698,000 in depreciation and amortization, $1,453,000 in
stock-based compensation expense, $2,033,000 related to the
amortization of debt discounts and issuance costs associated with
our private placements, $393,000 in equity-based
compensation, amortization of
issuance costs, $4,645,000 in
change in fair value of derivative liability, $1,082,000 from
extinguishment loss on debt, $1,204,000 related to increases in
inventory reserves, $4,706,000 loss on induced debt conversion of
convertible notes, $3,175,000 related to the loss on impairment of
intangible assets, $225,000 related to increase in allowance for
uncollectible accounts receivable, and $138,000 in deferred tax
assets, offset by $6,600,000 related to the change in the fair
value of contingent acquisition debt.
Changes in operating assets and liabilities in 2019 were
attributable to increases in working capital related to
changes in accounts receivable
of $6,524,000, inventory of approximately $600,000, other assets of
$1,309,000, income tax receivable of $7,000, accrued distributor
compensation of $219,000, deferred revenues of $407,000, accounts
payable of $102,000, operating lease liabilities of $1,158,000,
other long-term liabilities of $148,000 and accrued expenses and
other liabilities of $1,092,000, partially offset by
decreases
in working capital related to changes in prepaid expenses and other current assets of
$1,227,000.
Changes in operating assets and liabilities in 2018 were
attributable to increases in working
capital related to changes in inventory of approximately $907,000,
an advance of $5,000,000, accounts payable of $3,250,000, accrued
distributor compensation of $988,000, and deferred revenues of
$1,074,000, partially offset by decreases in working capital
related to changes in accounts receivable of $61,000, prepaid
expenses and other current assets of $158,000, income taxes
receivable of $32,000 and increases in accrued expenses and other
liabilities of $1,534,000.
Cash used in investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities for
the year ended December 31, 2019 was approximately $6,075,000 as
compared to $1,387,000 for the year ended December 31,
2018.
Payments related to acquisitions net of cash acquired from the
acquisitions for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
were approximately
$1,358,000 and $50,000,
respectively. Payments in 2019 consisted of $1,320,000 related to
the acquisition of Khrysos Global and $38,000 related to the
acquisition of BeneYOU net of $200,000 related to the payment of
certain liabilities.
Payments related to the purchase of property and equipment for the
year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $4,717,000
and $1,337,000, respectively. Payments in 2019 primarily consisted
of $3,441,000 towards the construction and equipment of the
Matagalpa Mill for the commercial coffee segment. The remaining
expenditures consisted of leasehold improvements and other
purchases of property and equipment and $288,000 for the purchase
of land related to the commercial hemp segment.
Payments in 2018 consisted primarily of $900,000 which was paid
towards the construction the Matagalpa Mill for the commercial
coffee segment and the remaining expenditures consisted primarily
of leasehold improvements and other purchases of property and
equipment.
Cash provided by financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was
$21,887,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to net
cash provided by financing activities of $15,709,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2018. Net cash provided by
financing activities in 2019 consisted of $2,000,000 of net
proceeds from the issuance of notes payable, $3,125,000 net
proceeds from the issuance of share purchase agreement,
$15,140,000 of net proceeds
from the issuance of equity through our preferred stock offerings
and convertible notes, $5,214,000 from the exercise
of stock options and warrants and $102,000 from at-the-market
issuance of shares, partially offset by $1,470,000 in payments
related to finance lease
obligations, $245,000 from net payments
related to the line of credit, $696,000 in payments to
reduce notes payable, $568,000 in payments to
reduce convertible notes payable, $460,000 in payments related to
contingent acquisition debt, and $255,000 in payments of
dividends related to preferred stock.
Net cash provided by financing activities in 2018
consisted
of $6,732,000 of net proceeds
from the issuance of notes payable, $12,487,000 of net proceeds
from the issuance of equity through our preferred stock offerings
and convertible notes,
$1,241,000 from the exercise of stock options and warrants,
partially offset by $1,282,000 in payments related to
finance
lease obligations, $1,552,000 of net
payments related to the line of credit, $1,625,000 in
payments to reduce notes payable, $165,000 in payments related to
contingent acquisition debt, and $127,000 in payments of
dividends related to preferred
stock.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our expected contractual obligations
and commitments subsequent to December 31, 2019 (in
thousands):
|
|
Current
|
Long-Term
|
||||
|
Total
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
Thereafter
|
Operating
lease liabilities
|
$10,050
|
$2,159
|
$1,900
|
$1,464
|
$969
|
$637
|
$2,921
|
Finance
lease liabilities
|
1,233
|
807
|
387
|
17
|
13
|
7
|
2
|
Line
of credit
|
2,011
|
2,011
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Notes
payable
|
12,208
|
5,191
|
554
|
2,175
|
325
|
532
|
3,431
|
Convertible
notes payable
|
3,115
|
25
|
900
|
2,190
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Contingent
acquisition debt
|
8,611
|
1,263
|
1,300
|
1,380
|
1,770
|
754
|
2,144
|
Purchase
obligations
|
4,219
|
4,219
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Construction
obligations
|
1,650
|
1,650
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$43,097
|
$17,325
|
$5,041
|
$7,226
|
$3,077
|
$1,930
|
$8,498
|
“Operating lease liabilities” include costs of certain office space, warehouses,
distribution centers and manufacturing centers and imputed
interest. These costs generally provide that property taxes,
insurance, and maintenance expenses are our responsibility. Such
expenses are not included in the operating lease amounts that are
outlined in the table above. (See Note 5 to the consolidated financial
statements.)
“Finance lease liabilities” include costs of equipment
and imputed interest. These costs generally provide that
maintenance expenses are our responsibility. Such expenses are not
included in the operating lease amounts that are outlined in the
table above. (See Note 5 to the
consolidated financial statements.)
“Line of credit” includes the principal balance of our
line of credit and bears interest based upon a year of 360-days
with interest being charged for each day the principal amount is
outstanding including the date of actual payment. The interest rate
is a rate equal to the prime rate plus 2.50% with a floor of 6.75%.
At December 31, 2019, the interest rate was 7.25%. In addition,
other fees are incurred for the maintenance of the loan in
accordance with the line of credit. Other fees may be incurred in
the event the minimum loan balance of $2,000,000 is not maintained.
Such fees are not included in the line of credit amounts that are
outlined in the table above. The line of credit was effective until
November 16, 2020 and will continue to be effective for additional
one-year terms unless written notice of termination is provided to
Crestmark not less than thirty days to the end of any renewal term.
The balances in the above table do not include interest expense
related to line of credit. (See Note 6 to the consolidated financial
statements.)
“Notes payable” includes the principal balance of
several borrowings as follows: (i) a credit note in the amount of
$5,000,000 entered into with Mr. Grover which bear interest at a
rate of 8.00% per annum and matures in December 2020, (ii) the
remaining principal balance of approximately $3,143,000 at December
31, 2019 on a mortgage for our corporate office property which
bears interest rate at the prime rate plus 2.50% per annum, or
7.50% at December 31, 2019,and matures in 2038 (iii) two promissory
notes totaling $2,000,000 which bear interest at a rate of 8.00%
per annum and matures in March 2021, in February 2021, respectively
and were extended by way of an amendment to the notes to extend the
maturity date to March 2022 which is reflected in the table above.
In addition, we agreed to increase the interest rate to 16% per
annum, (iv) an acquisition asset purchase liability in the amount
of approximately $1,027,000 at December 31, 2019 with no interest
rate or stated maturity, (v) the remaining principal balance of
approximately $440,000 at December 31, 2019 on a mortgage for a
45-acre tract of land in Groveland, FL (“Groveland”),
which bear interest at 6.00% per annum and matures in February
2024. This property was not available-for-sale at December 31,
2019, and was subsequently sold in 2021, (vi) a mortgage note assumed from the Khrysos Global
acquisition in the amount of $350,000 which bear interest at 8.00%
per annum with all principal due at maturity in September 2021,
(vii) the remaining principal balance of approximately$178,000 at
December 31, 2019 on a mortgage note for property in Clermont, FL
was assumed from the Khrysos Global acquisition which bear interest
at 7.00% and matures in June 2023. This property is currently
available-for-sale, and (viii) the remaining principal balance of
approximately $71,000 at December 31, 2019 of other notes related
to loans for commercial vans which mature at various dates through
2023. The balances in the above table do not include interest
expense related to the applicable notes payable.
On May 26, 2021, the Groveland
property was sold for $800,000. KII’s remaining production
property in Mascotte, FL is expected to be listed for sale by the
end of 2021. (See Note 6 & Note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements.)
“Convertible notes payable” includes our outstanding
senior secured convertible notes that are convertible into shares
of common stock at December 31, 2019 include our outstanding 2014
PIPE Note which is secured by certain of our pledged assets, bears
interest at a rate of 8.00% per annum and paid quarterly in arrears
with all principal and unpaid interest was due and paid in
September 2020. The outstanding 2019 PIPE Notes bear interest at a
rate of 6.00% per annum and paid quarterly in arrears with all
principal and unpaid interest due between February and July
2021. On February 18, 2021, the 2019 Notes that were
maturing in February and March 2021 were extended by way of an amendment to the
convertible notes, whereby we agreed to make certain principal
payments as agreed upon within the amendment, extending the
maturity dates between February 2022 and March 2022 which is
reflected in the table above. In addition, we agreed to increase
the interest rate between 12% and 16% per annum. (See Note 7
& Note 14 to the consolidated
financial statements.)
The balances in the above table do not include interest expense
related to the applicable convertible notes payable.
“Contingent acquisition debt” relates to
contingent liabilities related to business acquisitions. Generally,
these liabilities are payments to be made in the future based on a
level of revenue derived from the sale of products. These numbers
are estimates and actual numbers could be higher or lower because
many of our contingent liabilities relate to payments on sales that
have no maximum payment amount. In many of those transactions, we
have recorded a liability for contingent consideration as part of
the purchase price. All contingent consideration amounts are based
on management’s best estimates utilizing all known
information at the time of the calculation. (See Note 2
to the consolidated financial
statements.)
“Purchase obligations” are minimum future purchase
commitments for green coffee to be used in our commercial coffee
segment. Each individual contract requires us to purchase and take
delivery of certain quantities at agreed upon prices and delivery
dates. The contracts contain provisions whereby any delays in
taking delivery of the purchased product will result in additional
charges related to the extended warehousing of the coffee product.
The fees can average approximately $0.01 per pound for every month
of delay. To-date we have not incurred such
fees.
“Construction obligations” include the remaining
obligations towards our Matagalpa Mill construction agreement
entered into in January 2019. CLR has agreed to contribute
$4,700,000 towards the Matagalpa Mill. As of December 31,
2019, CLR contributed a total of $3,050,000 towards the Matagalpa
Mill project, in addition $391,117 was paid for operating
equipment. CLR’s remaining portion of $1,650,000 was paid in
2020, including an additional $912,606 for operating equipment. At
December 31, 2019, the Matagalpa Mill was not ready for full
operations.
Future Liquidity Needs
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared and presented on a basis assuming we will continue as a
going concern. At December 31, 2019, we had a significant
accumulated deficit and we have experienced significant losses and
incurred negative cash flows for the last few years. Net cash used
in operating activities was $15,014,000 and $12,352,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Our cash and
cash equivalents totaled $4,463,000 at December 31, 2019. We do not
currently believe that our existing cash resources are sufficient
to meet our anticipated needs over the next twelve months from the
date hereof. Based on our current cash levels and our current rate
of cash requirements, we will need to raise additional capital
and/or will need to further reduce our expenses from current
levels. Our independent registered public accounting firm has
issued a report that includes an explanatory paragraph referring to
our recurring losses from operations (anticipated continued losses
in the future) that raise substantial doubt in our ability to
continue as a going concern.
Historically, we have financed our operations primarily through
revenue generated from sales of our products and the public and
private sales of our securities and we expect to continue to seek
to obtain required capital in a similar manner. During the years
ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we did not generate sufficient
capital from operations to satisfy our expenses. We have spent, and
expect to continue to spend, a substantial amount of funds in
connection with implementing our business strategy. Additionally,
we may seek to access the public or private equity markets when
conditions are favorable due to our long-term capital requirements.
If we are unable to obtain additional capital (which is not assured
at this time), our long-term business plan may not be met, and we
may not be able to fulfill our debt obligations. Our ability
to raise capital through the sale of securities may be limited by
the rules of the SEC and Nasdaq that place limits on the number and
dollar amount of securities that may be sold. We do not have any
commitments from third parties for funding. A failure otherwise to
raise additional funds when needed in the future could result in us
being unable to complete planned operations, or forced to delay,
discontinue or curtail product development, forego sales and
marketing efforts, and forego licensing in attractive business
opportunities. Our ability to raise capital through the sale of
securities may be limited by the rules of the SEC and Nasdaq that
place limits on the number and dollar amount of securities that may
be sold. There can be no assurances that we will be able to raise
the funds needed on favorable terms, if at all, especially in light
of the fact that we will not be able to sell securities registered
on our registration statement on Form S-3 until at least June 1,
2022 and thereafter until such time the market value of our voting
securities held by non-affiliates is $75 million or more or our
common stock is once again listed on a national securities
exchange.
In January 2019, we entered into the ATM agreement with
Benchmark, as sales agent, pursuant to which we may sell from time
to time, at our option, shares of our common stock through
Benchmark, for the sale of up to $60,000,000 of shares of our
common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold
17,524 shares of common stock under the ATM agreement and received
net proceeds of approximately $102,000. We are not currently
eligible to register the offer and sale of our securities using a
registration statement on Form S-3 and therefore cannot make sales
under the ATM agreement until such time as we once again become S-3
eligible.
In February 2019, we entered into a securities purchase agreement
with one accredited investor that had a substantial pre-existing
relationship with us pursuant to which we sold 250,000 shares of
our common stock at an offering price of $7.00 per share. Pursuant
to the purchase agreement, we also issued to the investor a
three-year warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $7.00. We received proceeds of $1,750,000 from
the stock offering. In June 2019, we entered into a second
securities purchase agreement with this same accredited investor
pursuant to which we sold 250,000 shares of common stock at an
offering price of $5.50 per share. We received gross proceeds of
$1,375,000.
Between
February and July 2019, we closed five tranches related to the 2019
private placement debt offering, pursuant to which we offered for
sale up to $10,000,000 in principal amount of notes (the
“2019 PIPE Notes”), with each investor receiving 2,000
shares of common stock for each $100,000 invested. We entered into
subscription agreements with thirty-one accredited investors, that
had a substantial pre-existing relationship with us, pursuant to
which we received aggregate gross proceeds of $3,090,000 and issued
2019 PIPE Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $3,090,000 and
an aggregate of 61,800 shares of common stock. The 2019 PIPE Notes are secured by all equity in
KII. (See Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements.)
In
March 2019, we entered into a two-year secured promissory note
(“Note” or “Notes”) with two accredited
investors that had a substantial pre-existing relationship with us
pursuant to which we raised cash proceeds in the aggregate of
$2,000,000. At December 31, 2019, the outstanding principal balance
of the Notes was $2,000,000. The Notes
are secured by all equity in KII. In conjunction with the
Notes, we also issued 20,000 shares of our common stock for each
$1,000,000 invested and a five-year warrant to purchase 20,000
shares of common stock at a price of $6.00 per share for each
$1,000,000 invested. We issued in the
aggregate 40,000 shares of common stock and 40,000 warrants with
the Notes. (See Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements.)
Between September and December 2019, we closed two tranches of our
Series D offering, pursuant to which we issued and sold a total of
578,898 shares of our 9.75% Series D preferred stock at a weighted
average price to the public of $24.05 per share, less underwriting
discounts and commissions, pursuant to the terms of the
underwriting agreement that we entered into with Benchmark as
representative of the several underwriters. The 578,898 shares of
Series D preferred stock that were sold included 43,500 shares sold
pursuant to the overallotment option that we granted to the
underwriters that was exercised in full. At December 31, 2019,
36,809 overallotment shares were outstanding and were issued to the
underwriters in January 2020. The net proceeds from this offering
were approximately $12,269,000 after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and expenses which were paid by
us.
In March 2020, we closed one tranche related to our March 2020
private placement debt offering, pursuant to which we offered for
sale up to $5,000,000 in principal amount (the “2020 PIPE
Offering”), of senior secured promissory notes (the “Note or Notes”) with each
investor receiving 50,000 shares of common stock for each
$1,000,000 invested at an original issue discount of two
percent. The Notes bears interest at a
rate of 18.00% per annum. In March 2020, we entered into a
securities purchase agreement with Daniel J. Mangless pursuant to
which we issued a Note in the principal amount of $1,000,000, due
December 31, 2020. Mr. Mangless received 50,000 shares of the
Company’s stock from the Company in connection with his
investment. (See Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements.)
We do not believe that our existing cash resources are
sufficient to meet our anticipated needs over the next twelve
months from the date hereof. We are also considering additional
alternatives, including, but not limited to equity financings and
debt financings. Depending on market conditions, we cannot be sure
that additional capital will be available when needed or that, if
available, it will be obtained on terms favorable to us or to our
stockholders.
Failure to raise additional funds from the issuance of equity
securities and failure to implement cost reductions could adversely
affect our ability to operate as a going concern. There can be no
assurance that any cost reductions implemented will correct our
going concern issue. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might be necessary from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There were no off-balance sheet arrangements at either December 31,
2019 or 2018.
As a Smaller Reporting Company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act and in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are
electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are
not required to provide the information requested by this
Item.
Item 8. Consolidated Financial
Statements
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-1
|
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
F-4
|
|
F-5
|
|
F-6
|
|
F-6
|
|
F-9
|
|
F-10
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of:
Youngevity International, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Youngevity International, Inc.
and Subsidiaries (“Company”) as of December 31,
2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss,
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year
ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively
referred to as the “financial statements”). In our
opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31,
2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Adoption of New Accounting Standard
As
discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements, the Company
changed its method of accounting for revenue from contracts with
customers as a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers,
effective January 1, 2018, under the modified retrospective
method.
Going Concern Uncertainty
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note
1 to the financial statements, the Company has recurring losses and
is dependent on additional financing to fund operations. These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in
regard to these matters are also described in Note 1 to the
financial statements. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the
recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and
classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a
public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to
perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.
As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose
of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our
audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those
risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
/s/
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
We
served as the Company's auditor from 2011 to 2020.
San
Diego, California
April
15, 2019
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
To the
shareholders and board of directors of
Youngevity International, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Youngevity
International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the
“Company”) as of December 31, 2019, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss,
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended,
and the related notes (collectively referred to as the
“financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of December 31, 2019, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Going
Concern Matter
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note
1 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in
Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
Basis
for Opinion
These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a
public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to
perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.
As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose
of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express
no such opinion.
Our
audit includes performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those
risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
/s/
MaloneBailey, LLP
www.malonebailey.com
We have
served as the Company's auditor since 2020.
Houston,
Texas
June
24, 2021
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING–– FIRM
To the
shareholders and board of directors of
Youngevity International, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting
We have
audited the internal control over financial reporting of Youngevity
International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the
“Company”) as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria
established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). In our opinion, because of the effect of the
material weaknesses described below on the achievement of the
objectives of the control criteria, the Company did not maintain
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control —
Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We do
not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on
management’s statements referring to any corrective actions
taken by the Company after the date of management’s
assessment.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statement of the
Company as of December 31, 2019 and for the year then ended and our
report dated June 24, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on
those financial statements.
Basis
for Opinions
The
Company’s management is responsible for these financial
statements, for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the Company’s financial statements and an opinion on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on
our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud,
and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects.
A
material weakness is deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in
internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a
reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the
company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be
prevented or detected on timely basis. The following material
weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s
assessment: (i) Lack of effective risk assessment process; (ii)
Lack of effective overall control environment; (iii) Lack of
effective controls over monitoring; (iv) Lack of human resources
within finance and accounting functions; (v) Lack of information
technology control design and operating effectiveness; (vi) Lack of
controls or ineffectively designed controls impacting financial
reporting; (vii) Failures in operating effectiveness of the
internal control over financial reporting. These material
weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and
extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the December 31, 2019
consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect
our report on those financial statements.
Definition
and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A
company’s internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/
MaloneBailey, LLP
www.malonebailey.com
We have
served as the Company's auditor since 2020.
Houston,
Texas
June
24, 2021
Youngevity International, Inc.
and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
December
31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Assets
|
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$4,463
|
$2,879
|
Accounts
receivable trade (Note 3)
|
2,902
|
4,028
|
Income
tax receivable
|
81
|
74
|
Inventory
|
22,706
|
21,776
|
Advance
(Note 3)
|
–
|
5,000
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
3,982
|
5,263
|
Total
current assets
|
34,134
|
39,020
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
23,316
|
15,105
|
Operating
lease right-of-use assets
|
8,386
|
–
|
Deferred
tax assets, net
|
75
|
148
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
15,566
|
15,377
|
Goodwill
|
6,992
|
6,323
|
Other
assets
|
1,222
|
–
|
Total
assets
|
$89,691
|
$75,973
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$9,069
|
$8,478
|
Accrued
distributor compensation
|
3,164
|
3,289
|
Accrued
expenses
|
5,108
|
6,582
|
Deferred
revenues
|
1,943
|
2,312
|
Other
current liabilities
|
2,664
|
1,912
|
Operating
lease liabilities, current portion
|
1,740
|
–
|
Finance
lease liabilities, current portion
|
736
|
1,168
|
Line
of credit
|
2,011
|
2,256
|
Notes
payable, net of debt discounts, current portion (Note
3)
|
4,085
|
–
|
Notes
payable, net of debt discounts, current portion
|
191
|
141
|
Convertible
notes payable, net of debt discounts, current portion
|
25
|
647
|
Contingent
acquisition debt, current portion
|
1,263
|
795
|
Warrant
derivative liability
|
1,542
|
9,216
|
Total
current liabilities
|
33,541
|
36,796
|
Operating
lease liabilities, net of current portion
|
6,646
|
–
|
Finance
lease liabilities, net of current portion
|
408
|
1,107
|
Notes
payable, net of debt discounts, net of current portion
|
6,790
|
7,629
|
Convertible
notes payable, net of debt discounts, net of current
portion
|
2,675
|
–
|
Contingent
acquisition debt, net of current portion
|
7,348
|
7,466
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
2,115
|
–
|
Total
liabilities
|
59,523
|
52,998
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.001 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
Series
A – 8% convertible preferred stock; 161,135 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018
|
–
|
–
|
Series
B – 5% convertible preferred stock; 129,332 and 129,437
shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively; $1,244 liquidation preference at December 31,
2019
|
–
|
–
|
Series
D – 9.75% cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock;
578,898 and zero shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019
and 2018, respectively; $14,590 liquidation preference at December
31, 2019
|
–
|
–
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized; 30,274,601
and 25,760,708 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019
and 2018, respectively
|
30
|
26
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
265,825
|
206,757
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(235,751)
|
(183,763)
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
64
|
(45)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
30,168
|
22,975
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$89,691
|
$75,973
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
Youngevity International, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Revenues
|
$147,442
|
$162,445
|
Cost
of revenues
|
53,482
|
67,413
|
Gross
profit
|
93,960
|
95,032
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
Distributor
compensation
|
56,488
|
61,087
|
Sales
and marketing
|
14,167
|
13,398
|
General
and administrative
|
61,800
|
20,009
|
Loss
on impairment of intangible assets
|
8,461
|
3,175
|
Loss
on impairment of goodwill
|
6,831
|
–
|
Total
operating expenses
|
147,747
|
97,669
|
Operating
loss
|
(53,787)
|
(2,637)
|
Other
income (expenses), net
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net
|
(2,818)
|
(6,584)
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
5,502
|
(4,645)
|
Loss
on modification of warrants
|
(876)
|
–
|
Loss
on induced debt conversion
|
–
|
(4,706)
|
Extinguishment
loss on debt
|
–
|
(1,082)
|
Total
other income (expenses), net
|
1,808
|
(17,017)
|
Net
loss before income tax provision
|
(51,979)
|
(19,654)
|
Income
tax provision
|
9
|
416
|
Net
loss
|
(51,988)
|
(20,070)
|
Deemed
dividend on preferred stock
|
–
|
(3,276)
|
Deemed
dividend on common stock
|
(281)
|
-
|
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(399)
|
(151)
|
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$(52,668)
|
$(23,497)
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per share, basic
|
$(1.80)
|
$(1.09)
|
Net
loss per share, diluted
|
$(1.85)
|
$(1.09)
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding, basic
|
29,264,132
|
21,589,226
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding, diluted
|
29,285,064
|
21,589,226
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
Youngevity International, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(In thousands)
|
Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Net
loss
|
$(51,988)
|
$(20,070)
|
Foreign
currency translation
|
109
|
236
|
Total
other comprehensive income
|
109
|
236
|
Comprehensive
loss
|
$(51,879)
|
$(19,834)
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
Youngevity International, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Mezzanine
Equity
(In thousands, except shares)
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock
|
Total
|
||||||
|
Series A
|
Series B
|
Series D
|
Common Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Income
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders'
|
Series
C
|
Mezzanine
|
|||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
(Loss)
|
Deficit
|
Equity
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Equity
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
161,135
|
$–
|
–
|
$–
|
–
|
$–
|
19,723,285
|
$20
|
$171,405
|
$(281)
|
$(163,693)
|
$7,451
|
–
|
$–
|
$–
|
Net
loss
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(20,070)
|
(20,070)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
236
|
–
|
236
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance of Series
B preferred stock, net of issuance cost
|
–
|
–
|
381,173
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
3,289
|
–
|
–
|
3,289
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of Series C preferred stock, net of issuance cost
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
697,363
|
6,236
|
6,236
|
Issuance
of common stock, private placement, net of issuance
costs
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
780,526
|
1
|
1,272
|
–
|
–
|
1,273
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock pursuant to the exercise of stock options and
warrants
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
235,431
|
–
|
1,241
|
–
|
–
|
1,241
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock for services
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
340,000
|
–
|
1,815
|
–
|
–
|
1,815
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock and warrants related to the note exchange –
2014 Note
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
777,664
|
1
|
8,705
|
–
|
–
|
8,706
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock for conversion of Series B preferred
stock
|
–
|
–
|
(251,736)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
503,472
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock for conversion of Series C preferred
stock
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,394,726
|
2
|
6,234
|
–
|
–
|
6,236
|
(697,363)
|
(6,236)
|
(6,236)
|
Issuance
of common stock for conversion of notes – 2017
Notes
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,577,033
|
2
|
6,542
|
–
|
–
|
6,544
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance of common
stock for conversion of notes – 2015
Notes
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
428,571
|
–
|
3,000
|
–
|
–
|
3,000
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Fair value warrant
issuance
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,469
|
–
|
–
|
1,469
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Warrant
modification
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
284
|
–
|
–
|
284
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Release of warrant
liability upon warrant exercises
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
199
|
–
|
–
|
199
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Dividends on preferred
stock
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(151)
|
–
|
–
|
(151)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,453
|
–
|
–
|
1,453
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
161,135
|
–
|
129,437
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
25,760,708
|
26
|
206,757
|
(45)
|
(183,763)
|
22,975
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
|
Preferred
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock
|
Total
|
||||||
|
Series A
|
Series
B
|
Series
D
|
Common Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Income
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders'
|
Series
C
|
Mezzanine
|
|||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
(Loss)
|
Deficit
|
Equity
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(51,988)
|
(51,988)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
109
|
–
|
109
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of Series D preferred stock, net of issuance cost
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
578,898
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
12,269
|
–
|
–
|
12,269
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock for acquisition of Khrysos Global
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,794,972
|
1
|
13,999
|
–
|
–
|
14,000
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock for related to purchase of land -
H&H
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
153,846
|
–
|
1,200
|
–
|
–
|
1,200
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock for related to purchase of trademark -
H&H
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
100,000
|
–
|
750
|
–
|
–
|
750
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock pursuant to the exercise of stock options and
warrants
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,164,176
|
2
|
5,373
|
–
|
–
|
5,375
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock for share purchase agreement
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
505,000
|
–
|
3,125
|
–
|
–
|
3,125
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Equity
based compensation related to the issuance of common stock for
services
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
250,600
|
–
|
1,466
|
–
|
–
|
1,466
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock for inducement shares
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
64,250
|
–
|
478
|
–
|
–
|
478
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock for true-up shares
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
44,599
|
–
|
281
|
–
|
–
|
281
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Deemed Dividend on common stock – true up shares
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(281)
|
–
|
–
|
(281)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock for promissory note
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
40,000
|
–
|
350
|
–
|
–
|
350
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock for convertible note financing
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
77,250
|
–
|
451
|
–
|
–
|
451
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock related to advance for working capital, net of
settlement of debt (Note 3)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
174,261
|
1
|
1,359
|
–
|
–
|
1,360
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Fair
value of common stock issued in relation to advance for working
capital (Note 3)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
121,649
|
–
|
397
|
–
|
–
|
397
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock related to at-the-market financing
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
17,524
|
–
|
102
|
–
|
–
|
102
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Issuance
of common stock for conversion of Series B preferred
stock
|
–
|
–
|
(105)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
210
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Vesting
of restricted stock units
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
5,556
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Equity
based compensation related to the issuance of warrants for
services
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
414
|
–
|
–
|
414
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Equity
based compensation related to the warrant issued upon vesting for
services
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
2,466
|
–
|
–
|
2,466
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Release
of warrant liability upon warrant exercises
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,077
|
–
|
–
|
1,077
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Release
of warrant liability upon reclassification of liability to
equity
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
1,494
|
–
|
–
|
1,494
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(399)
|
–
|
–
|
(399)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
12,697
|
–
|
–
|
12,697
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
161,135
|
$–
|
129,332
|
$–
|
578,898
|
$–
|
30,274,601
|
$30
|
$265,825
|
$64
|
$(235,751)
|
$30,168
|
–
|
$–
|
$–
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
Youngevity International, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
|
Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(51,988)
|
$(20,070)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4,535
|
4,698
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
12,697
|
1,453
|
Equity-based
compensation for services
|
4,597
|
393
|
Change
in fair value of warrant derivative liability
|
(5,502)
|
4,645
|
Loss
on modification of warrants
|
876
|
–
|
Amortization
of debt discounts and issuance costs
|
1,219
|
2,033
|
Change
in fair value of contingent acquisition debt
|
(1,838)
|
(6,600)
|
Changes
in inventory reserve
|
1,141
|
1,204
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
73
|
138
|
Increase
in allowance for accounts receivable
|
8,005
|
225
|
Loss
on impairment of intangible assets
|
8,461
|
3,175
|
Loss
on impairment of goodwill
|
6,831
|
–
|
Loss
on induced debt conversion of convertible notes
|
–
|
4,706
|
Extinguishment
loss on debt
|
–
|
1,082
|
Allowance
for notes and other receivables (Note 3)
|
5,737
|
–
|
Noncash
operating lease expense
|
1,158
|
–
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect from business
combinations:
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
(6,524)
|
61
|
Inventory
|
(600)
|
(907)
|
Advance
(Note 3)
|
–
|
(5,000)
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
1,227
|
158
|
Other
assets
|
(1,309)
|
–
|
Income
taxes receivable
|
(7)
|
32
|
Accounts
payable
|
(102)
|
(3,250)
|
Accrued
distributor compensation
|
(219)
|
(988)
|
Deferred
revenues
|
(407)
|
(1,074)
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
(1,092)
|
1,534
|
Operating
lease liabilities
|
(1,158)
|
–
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
(148)
|
–
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(14,337)
|
(12,352)
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
Acquisitions,
net of cash acquired
|
(1,358)
|
(50)
|
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(4,717)
|
(1,337)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(6,075)
|
(1,387)
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of notes payable, net
|
2,000
|
6,732
|
Proceeds
from issuance of share purchase agreement
|
3,125
|
–
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock – Series B,
net
|
–
|
3,289
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock – Series C,
net
|
–
|
6,236
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock – Series D,
net
|
12,269
|
–
|
Proceeds
from issuance of convertible notes payable, net
|
2,871
|
2,962
|
Proceeds
from the exercise of stock options and warrants, net *
|
5,214
|
1,241
|
Proceeds
from at-the-market offering transactions
|
102
|
–
|
Payments
of finance leases
|
(1,470)
|
(1,282)
|
Payments of line of
credit, net of
proceeds
|
(245)
|
(1,552)
|
Payments
of notes payable
|
(696)
|
(1,625)
|
Payments
of convertible notes payable
|
(568)
|
–
|
Payments
of contingent acquisition debt
|
(460)
|
(165)
|
Payments
of dividends on preferred stock
|
(255)
|
(127)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
21,887
|
15,709
|
Foreign
currency effect on cash
|
109
|
236
|
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
1,584
|
2,206
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
2,879
|
673
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
$4,463
|
$2,879
|
*
Represents the cash portion related to the exercise of warrants
– see supplemental below for non-cash portion of exercises of
warrants in the amount of $161,000 related to the year ended
December 31, 2019.
Youngevity International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Continued
(In thousands)
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
Interest
|
$1,912
|
$4,623
|
Income
tax payments, net of refunds
|
$325
|
$20
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Noncash Investing and Financing
Activities
|
|
|
Purchases
of property and equipment funded by finance leases
|
$2,047
|
$1,880
|
Purchases
of property and equipment funded by mortgage
agreements
|
$450
|
$–
|
Acquisitions
of net assets in exchange for contingent debt, net of purchase
price adjustments (Note 2)
|
$–
|
$523
|
Fair
value of common stock issued for services (Note 10)
|
$–
|
$1,815
|
Fair
value of common stock issued for property and equipment
(land)
|
$1,200
|
$–
|
Fair
value of common stock issued for purchase of intangibles
(tradename)
|
$750
|
$–
|
Issuance of common
stock to pay for certain working capital, construction and other
payables (Note 3)
|
$1,360
|
$–
|
Fair
value of common stock issued for in relation to advance for working
capital (Note 3)
|
$397
|
$–
|
Issuance
of common stock for the noncash exercise of warrants
|
$161
|
$–
|
Issuance
of common stock for promissory note financing (Note
10)
|
$350
|
$-
|
Issuance
of common stock for convertible note financing (Note
10)
|
$451
|
$-
|
Beneficial
conversion feature associated with the issuance of Series C
preferred stock
|
$–
|
$3,276
|
Fair
value of common stock issued upon the conversion of 2015 PIPE Notes
(Note 7)
|
$–
|
$3,000
|
Fair
value of the warrants issued in connection with financing recorded
as a derivative liability (Note 8 & 10)
|
$–
|
$1,689
|
Fair
value of stock issued in connection with 2014 PIPE Note conversion
(Note 7)
|
$–
|
$4,000
|
Fair
value of warrants issued in connection with credit agreement (Note
6)
|
$–
|
$1,486
|
Fair
value of stock issued upon conversion of 2017 PIPE Notes to common
stock (Note 7)
|
$–
|
$6,544
|
Fair
value of stock issued in connection with the acquisition of Khrysos
Global, Inc. (Note 2)
|
$14,000
|
$–
|
Dividends
declared but not paid at the end of period (Note 10)
|
$144
|
$24
|
Change
in warrant derivative liability to equity classification due to
warrant modification (Note 8)
|
$–
|
$284
|
Release
of warrant liability upon exercise of warrants
|
$1,077
|
$199
|
Right
of use assets and right of use liabilities recognized
|
$9,544
|
$–
|
Deemed
divided on common stock related to true up shares
|
$281
|
$–
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
Youngevity International, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019 and 2018
Note 1. Description of Business and Basis of
Presentation
Nature of Business
Youngevity International, Inc. (the “Company”), founded
in 1996, operates in three segments: (i) the direct selling segment
where products are offered through a global distribution network of
preferred customers and distributors, (ii) the commercial coffee
segment where products are sold directly to businesses and (iii)
the commercial hemp segment where the Company manufactures
proprietary systems to provide end-to-end extraction and processing
that allow for the conversion of hemp feed stock into hemp oil and
hemp extracts. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company
operated in two business segments, its direct selling segment and
its commercial coffee segment. During the first quarter of
2019, through the acquisition
of the assets of Khrysos Global, Inc. the Company added the
commercial hemp as a third business segment to its operations as
further discussed below.
Information on the operations of the Company’s three segments
is as follows:
●
Direct selling segment is operated through three
domestic subsidiaries, AL Global Corporation, 2400 Boswell LLC, and
Youngevity Global LLC, and twelve foreign
subsidiaries;
Youngevity– Australia
Pty. Ltd., Youngevity NZ, Ltd., Youngevity Mexico S.A. de CV,
Youngevity Russia, LLC, Youngevity Israel, Ltd., Youngevity Europe
SIA (Latvia), Youngevity Colombia S.A.S, Youngevity International
Singapore Pte. Ltd., Mialisia Canada, Inc., Youngevity Global LLC,
Taiwan Branch, Youngevity Global LLC, Philippine Branch and
Youngevity International (Hong Kong). The Company also operates in
Indonesia, Malaysia, and Japan through its sales force of
independent distributors. .
●
Commercial coffee segment is operated through the Company’s
subsidiaries CLR Roasters LLC (“CLR”) and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Siles Plantation Family Group S.A.
(“Siles”).
●
Commercial hemp segment is operated through the Company’s
subsidiaries Khrysos Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(“KII”), which acquired the assets of Khrysos Global
Inc., a Florida corporation (“Khrysos Global”), in
February 2019, and the wholly-owned subsidiaries, Khrysos Global,
INXL Laboratories, Inc., a Florida corporation (“INXL”)
and INX Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation
(“INXH”).
In the following text, the terms “we,”
“our,” and “us” may refer, as the context
requires, to the Company or collectively to the Company and its
subsidiaries.
Non-reliance of Previously Issued Financial Statements
On October 16, 2020 the Company filed a notice of non-reliance on
previously issued financial statements with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”), reporting that the
Company’s Audit Committee determined that the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended
March 31, 2019, June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019 contained in
the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q previously filed
with the SEC on May 20, 2019, August
14, 2019 and November 18, 2019 should no longer be relied upon.
Similarly, related press releases, earnings releases, and investor
communications describing the Company’s unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for those periods should no
longer be relied upon. As a result, the Company intends to file a
restatement related to these periods as soon as practicable. The
intended restatements are related to the Company’s commercial
coffee segment and the commercial hemp segment, further details are
summarized below:
Commercial Coffee Segment
During the Company’s 2019 annual audit, the Company reviewed
revenues related to CLR, specifically the 2019 green coffee sales
program, for sales made by the Company to its joint venture
partner, Hernandez, Hernandez, Export Y Compania Limitada
(“H&H’) and for sales recorded to major independent
customers. These sales were originally recorded at gross (revenue
recorded without reduction for cost to purchase the
inventory).
As part of the review, the Company assessed whether the 2019 green
coffee sales to H&H depicted the transfer of promised goods or
services to H&H in an amount that reflects the consideration to
which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those
goods or services. For sales made to larger independent customers,
the Company assessed whether revenue was recognizable.
For both reviews, the following five steps were applied to review
if the core revenue recognition principles were meet:
●
Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer
●
Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the
contract
●
Step 3: Determine the transaction price
●
Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance
obligations in the contract
●
Step 5: Recognize revenue when the company satisfies a performance
obligation
During this review process the Company focused on identifying the
performance obligations in the contracts with H&H. The
Company’s review indicated that per the underlying terms and
conditions of the contracts entered into with H&H, (the
provider of the “wet” green coffee and the buyer of the
processed coffee), that CLR is assigned the green coffee beans as
coffee is delivered to its mill processing facility. Assignment of
the coffee is defined as taking of physical possession of the green
coffee for the purpose of processing the green coffee. Under the
assignment CLR is responsible for insuring all reasonable and
necessary actions to ensure the coffee beans are safeguarded during
processing at the Company’s coffee mill. CLR does not take
ownership and does not incur financial risk associated with the
coffee as it is delivered to its mill. Based on the above
assessment, management has concluded that CLR does not control the
green coffee before it is provided to H&H, at the point of sale
to H&H.
Management has determined that when CLR provides the processed
green coffee to H&H, the goods or services provided to H&H
is the performance obligation to provide milling services for the
green coffee. As such, the Company is the agent for the milling
services.
Management has also determined that since the Company does not
control the green coffee beans at the point of delivery to the
mill, and that legal title to the green coffee beans is transferred
momentarily, before the green coffee beans are sold back to
H&H, that the Company is therefore an agent in sales
transactions of green coffee beans to H&H.
Therefore, management has determined that for green coffee sales
made by the Company to its joint venture partner, H&H Export,
the Company should have recorded these sales at net of costs to
purchase inventory, which reflects the value of the performance
obligation to provide milling services. For the year ended December
31, 2019, the Company is reporting its revenue for coffee when sold
to H&H Export at net.
With regard to sales made to major independent customers, the
Company focused on if recognition of revenue thresholds were met
and if the company had satisfied its performance obligation and
could reasonably expect payment for fulling these performance
obligations. The Company determined that for certain sales to
larger customers, these thresholds were not met, and therefore
revenue should not have been recognized.
The Company intends to restate its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 2019, three and six months
ended June 30, 2019, and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2019 related to this change in revenue recognition.
(See Note 3 under “Other Related Party
Transactions” for further
discussion related to H&H Export.)
Commercial Hemp Segment
In conjunction with the Company’s 2019 annual audit the
Company concluded that certain fixed assets acquired in the
acquisition of KII and the share price valuation for the common
stock issued as consideration were not fairly valued as of the
closing date February 12, 2019 which resulted in a decrease to the
net assets acquired including; a) $1,127,000 related to the certain
fixed assets, and b) $1,351,000 related to a change in the fair
value of common stock issuance resulting in an increase to goodwill
of $2,478,000 acquired and an adjusted aggregate purchase price of
$15,894,000. The Company intends to restate its quarterly reports
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2019, three and
six months ended June 30, 2019, and for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2019. (See Note 2 under “Khrysos Global, Inc.” for further discussion regarding this
acquisition.)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies
consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying
consolidated financial statements follows:
Basis of Presentation
The Company consolidates all majority owned subsidiaries,
investments in entities in which the Company has controlling
influence and variable interest entities where it has been
determined to be the primary beneficiary. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Variable Interest Entities
The Company consolidates all variable interest entities in which it
holds a variable interest and is the primary beneficiary of the
entity. Generally, a variable interest entity (“VIE”)
is a legal entity with one or more of the following
characteristics: (a) the total at risk equity investment is not
sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without
additional subordinated financial support from other parties; (b)
as a group the holders of the equity investment at risk lack any
one of the following characteristics: (i) the power, through voting
or similar rights, to direct the activities of the entity that most
significantly impact its economic performance, (ii) the obligation
to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to
receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) some
equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to
their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity's
activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an
investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. The primary
beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE and is the
entity that has (a) the power to direct the activities of the VIE
that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, and
(b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to
receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant
to the VIE.
In determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, the
Company considers qualitative and quantitative factors, including,
but not limited to: which activities most significantly impact the
VIE's economic performance and which party has the power to direct
such activities; the amount and characteristics of Company's
interests and other involvements in the VIE; the obligation or
likelihood for the Company or other investors to provide financial
support to the VIE; and the similarity with and significance to the
business activities of Company and the other investors. Significant
judgments related to these determinations include estimates about
the current and future fair values and performance of these VIEs
and general market conditions.
Related Party Transaction Policy and Procedures
Pursuant to the Company’s Related Party Transaction and
Procedures, the Company’s executive officers, directors, and
principal stockholders, including their immediate family members
and affiliates, are prohibited from entering into a related party
transaction with the Company without the prior consent of its audit
committee or its independent directors. Any request for the Company
to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director,
principal stockholder, or any of such persons’ immediate
family members or affiliates, must first be presented to the
Company’s audit committee for review, consideration and
approval. The request shall include a description of the
transaction and the aggregate dollar amount. In determining whether
to approve, ratify, disapprove or reject a related party
transaction, the audit committee shall take into account,
among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the related party
transaction is entered into on terms no less favorable to the
Company than terms generally available to an unaffiliated
third-party under the same or similar circumstances; the results of
an appraisal, if any; whether there was a bidding process and the
results thereof; review of the valuation methodology used and
alternative approaches to valuation of the transaction; and the
extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction.
The Company’s audit committee
approves only those agreements that, in light of known
circumstances, are in, or are not inconsistent with, its best
interests, as its audit committee determines in the good faith
exercise of its discretion.
Segment Information
The Company has three reportable segments: direct selling,
commercial coffee and commercial hemp. The direct selling segment
develops and distributes health and wellness products through its
global independent direct selling network also known as multi-level
marketing. The commercial coffee segment is engaged in coffee
roasting and distribution, specializing in gourmet coffee. The
commercial hemp segment manufactures proprietary systems to provide
end-to-end extraction and processing that allow for the conversion
of hemp feed stock into hemp oil and hemp extracts. The
determination that the Company has three reportable segments is
based upon the guidance set forth in Accounting Standards
Codification (“ASC”) Topic 280, “Segment
Reporting.”
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(“GAAP”) requires the Company to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenue and expense for each reporting period. Estimates are
used in accounting for, among other things, allowances for doubtful
accounts, deferred taxes and related valuation allowances,
fair value of derivative liabilities, uncertain tax positions, loss
contingencies, fair value of options granted under the
Company’s stock-based compensation plan, fair value of assets
and liabilities acquired in business combinations, finance leases,
asset impairments, estimates of future cash flows used to evaluate
impairments, useful lives of property and equipment and intangible
assets, value of contingent acquisition debt, inventory
obsolescence and sales returns.
Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts and
such differences may be material to the consolidated financial
statements. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed
periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected
prospectively in the period they occur.
Liquidity and Going Concern
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
and presented on a basis assuming the Company will continue as a
going concern. The Company has sustained significant net losses
during the year ended December 31, 2019 of approximately
$51,998,000 and $20,070,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $14,337,000
and $12,352,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively. The Company anticipates similar continued results for
the year 2020.
Management has assessed the Company’s ability to continue as
a going concern and concluded that additional capital will be
required during the twelve-months subsequent to the filing date of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The timing of when the additional
capital will be required is uncertain and highly dependent on
factors discussed below. There can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to execute license or purchase agreements or to obtain
equity or debt financing, or on terms acceptable to it. Factors
within and outside the Company’s control could have a
significant bearing on its ability to obtain additional financing.
As a result, management has determined that there are material
uncertainties that cast substantial doubt upon the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company has and continues to take the following actions to
alleviate the cash used in operations.
The Company reported total revenue of $147,442,000 a decrease of
approximately 9.2% for the twelve-months ending December 31, 2019
when compared to the same period a year ago. The Company continues
to focus on revenue growth, but the Company cannot make assurances
that revenues will grow. Additionally, the Company has plans to
make the necessary cost reductions and to reduce non-essential
expenses, including international operations that are not
performing well to help alleviate the cash used in operating
activities.
With regard to the possible effect the COVID-19 coronavirus will
have on the Company, to date, the outbreak of the COVID-19
coronavirus has impacted the Company’s ability to properly
staff and maintain its domestic and international warehousing
operations due to stay at home orders issued within various
locations where the Company operates warehouse and shipping
operations. The Company has taken actions to mitigate the impact of
these stay at home orders have on warehouse and shipping operations
but cannot assert that continuing stay at home orders or further
restrictive orders will not have an impact on these operations. The
Company has experienced changes in product mix demand, with demand
increasing toward health-oriented products and weakening for
non-health related products. Such changes in demand may have a
significant impact on revenues, margins and net operating profit
moving forward. Additionally, certain of the Company’s
third-party suppliers may have been negatively impacted by stay at
home orders. Accordingly, the Company is considering alternative
product sourcing in the event that product supply becomes
problematic. Due to these current and possible incremental impacts
related to the COVID-19 virus, the Company is unable to predict the
possible future effect on the demand for products sold by the
Company, and the related revenues, margins and operating profit if
COVID-19 coronavirus or another such virus continues to expand
globally and throughout the U.S.
In addition, the outbreak of the COVID-19 coronavirus could disrupt
the Company’s operations due to absenteeism by infected or
ill members of management or other employees, or absenteeism by
members of management and other employees who elect not to come to
work due to the illness affecting others in our office or other
workplace, or due to quarantines. COVID-19 illness could also
impact members of our board of directors resulting in absenteeism
from meetings of the directors or committees of directors and
making it more difficult to convene the quorums of the full board
of directors or its committees needed to conduct meetings for the
management of our affairs.
In January 2020, the Company issued an additional 11,375 shares of
Series D preferred stock upon the partial exercise by the
underwriters in the Company’s public offering of Series D
preferred stock of the overallotment option granted to such
underwriters. The overallotment shares were sold at a price to the
public of $22.75 per share, generating additional gross proceeds of
approximately $259,000. (See Note 10)
In March 2020, the Company closed the initial
tranche of its March 2020 private placement debt offering of up to
an aggregate of $5,000,000 in the principal amount together with up
to 250,000 shares of common stock. The Company entered into a
securities purchase agreement with Daniel J. Mangless,
and issued to Mr. Mangless a note in
the principal amount of $1,000,000 due December 31, 2020 and
bearing interest at 18.00% per annum. The Company received proceeds
of $1,000,000. Mr. Mangless received 50,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock in connection with his
investment.
The Company continues to seek and obtain additional equity or debt
financing on terms that are acceptable to the Company.
Depending on market conditions, there can be no assurance that
additional capital will be available when needed or that, if
available, it will be obtained on terms favorable to the Company or
to its stockholders.
These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis, which asserts the Company has the ability in the near term
to continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and
commitments in a planned manner giving consideration to the above
and expected possible outcomes. The financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might be necessary from the outcome of
this uncertainty. Within the current operating environment due to
the declared national emergency, related to COVID 19 combined with
the management plans described above the Company cannot assert that
the doubt of the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern has been substantially alleviated, Conversely, if the going
concern assumption is not appropriate, adjustments to the carrying
amounts of the Company’s assets, liabilities, revenues,
expenses and balance sheet classifications may be necessary, and
these adjustments could be material.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers only its monetary liquid assets with original
maturities of three months or less as cash and cash
equivalents.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are recorded net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts. Accounts receivable are considered delinquent when the
due date on the invoice has passed. The Company records its
allowance for doubtful accounts based upon its assessment of
various factors including past experience, the age of the accounts
receivable balances, the credit quality of its customers, current
economic conditions and other factors that may affect
customers’ ability to pay. Accounts receivable are written
off against the allowance for doubtful accounts when all collection
efforts by the Company have been unsuccessful.
Inventory and Cost of Revenues
The Company purchases its inventory from multiple third-party
suppliers at competitive prices. Inventory is stated at the lower
of cost or net realizable value, net of a valuation allowance. Cost
is determined using the first-in, first-out method. The Company
records an inventory reserve for estimated excess and obsolete
inventory based upon historical turnover, market conditions and
assumptions about future demand for its products. When applicable,
expiration dates of certain inventory items with a definite life
are taken into consideration.
Cost of revenues includes the cost of inventory, shipping and
handling costs, royalties associated with certain products,
transaction banking costs, warehouse labor costs and depreciation
on certain assets.
Deferred Issuance Costs
Deferred issuance costs include stock and warrant issuance costs
and debt discounts of approximately $1,127,000 and $1,717,000, at
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which are associated
with the Company’s private placement transactions and its
credit agreement with Carl Grover. Issuance costs are included net
of convertible notes payable and notes payable on the Company's
consolidated balance sheets. Deferred issuance costs are
amortized over the life of the notes to interest expense. (See
Notes 6 and 7)
Plantation Costs
The
Company’s commercial coffee segment includes the results of
Siles, which is comprised of (i) a 500-acre coffee plantation and
(ii) a dry-processing facility located on 26 acres, both of which
are located in Matagalpa, Nicaragua. Siles is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of CLR, and the results of CLR include the
depreciation and amortization of capitalized costs, development and
maintenance and harvesting costs of Siles. In accordance with
GAAP plantation maintenance and harvesting costs for commercially
producing coffee farms are charged against earnings when
sold. Deferred harvest costs accumulate throughout the year
and are expensed over the remainder of the year as the coffee is
sold. The difference between actual harvest costs incurred and the
amount of harvest costs recognized as expense is recorded as either
an increase or decrease in deferred harvest costs, which is
reported as an asset and included with prepaid expenses and other
current assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Once the harvest
is complete, the harvest costs are then recognized as the inventory
value. Deferred costs associated with the harvest at December 31,
2019 and 2018 were approximately $350,000 and $400,000,
respectively, and are included in prepaid expenses and other
current assets on the Company’s consolidated balance
sheets.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at historical cost.
Depreciation is provided in amounts sufficient to relate the cost
of depreciable assets to operations over the estimated useful lives
of the related assets. The straight-line method of depreciation and
amortization is followed for financial statement purposes.
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the life
of the respective lease or the useful life of the improvements.
Estimated service lives range from 3 to 39 years. When such assets
are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain
or loss is reflected in operations in the period of disposal. The
cost of normal maintenance and repairs is charged to expense as
incurred. Significant expenditures that increase the useful life of
an asset are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful
life of the asset.
Coffee trees, land improvements and equipment specifically related
to the plantations are stated at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation of coffee trees and other equipment
is reported on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful
lives of the assets (25 years for coffee trees, between 5 and 15
years for equipment and land improvements).
Property and equipment are considered long-lived assets and are
evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate their net book value may not be recoverable.
Management has determined that no impairment of its property and
equipment occurred at December 31, 2019 or 2018.
Operating and Financing Leases
The Company leases certain office space, warehouses, distribution
centers, manufacturing centers, and equipment. A contract is or
contains a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the
use of identified property, plant, or equipment (an identified
asset) for a period of time in exchange for
consideration.
In general, the Company’s leases include one or more options
to renew, with renewal terms that generally vary from one to ten
years. The exercise of lease renewal options is generally at the
Company’s sole discretion. The depreciable life of assets and
leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term,
unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably
certain of exercise.
The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material
residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. Leases
with an initial term of twelve months or less are not
recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance
sheets, and the Company does not separate non-lease components from
lease components. Lease cost is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the lease term.
Finance lease right-of-use assets are amortized over their
estimated useful lives, as the Company does believe that it is
reasonably certain that options which transfer ownership will be
exercised. In general, for the majority of the Company’s
material leases, the renewal options are not included in the
calculation of its right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, as
the Company does not believe that it is reasonably certain that
these renewal options will be exercised. Periodically, the Company
assesses its leases to determine whether it is reasonably certain
that these options and any renewal options could be reasonably
expected to be exercised.
The majority of the Company’s leases are for real estate and
equipment. In general, the individual lease contracts do not
provide information about the rate implicit in the lease. Because
the Company is not able to determine the rate implicit in its
leases, it instead generally uses its incremental borrowing rate to
determine the present value of lease liabilities. In determining
its incremental borrowing rate, the Company reviewed the terms of
its leases, its senior secured credit facility, swap rates, and
other factors.
Business Combinations
The Company accounts for business combinations under the
acquisition method and allocates the total purchase price for
acquired businesses to the tangible and identified intangible
assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated
fair values. When a business combination includes the exchange of
the Company’s common stock, the value of the common stock is
determined using the closing market price at the date such shares
were tendered to the selling parties. The fair values assigned to
tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities
assumed are based on management or third-party estimates and
assumptions that utilize established valuation techniques
appropriate for the Company’s industry and each acquired
business. Goodwill is recorded as the excess, if any, of the
aggregate fair value of consideration exchanged for an acquired
business over the fair value (measured at the acquisition date) of
total net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired. A
liability for contingent consideration, if applicable, is recorded
at fair value at the acquisition date. In determining the fair
value of such contingent consideration, management estimates the
amount to be paid based on probable outcomes and expectations on
financial performance of the related acquired business. The fair
value of contingent consideration is reassessed quarterly, with any
change in the estimated value charged to operations in the period
of the change. Increases or decreases in the fair value of the
contingent consideration obligations can result from changes in
actual or estimated revenue streams, discount periods, discount
rates and probabilities that contingencies will be
met.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are comprised of distributor organizations,
trademarks and tradenames, customer relationships, internally
developed software and non-compete agreements. The
Company's acquired intangible assets, which are subject to
amortization over their estimated useful lives, are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an intangible asset may not be
recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying
amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value. The Company
evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate their net book value may not be
recoverable. The Company first considers whether indicators of
impairment are present. If indicators are present, the Company will
perform a recoverability test by comparing the sum of the estimated
undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the asset (group) in
question to its carrying amount (as a reminder, entities cannot
record an impairment for a held and used asset unless the asset
first fails this recoverability test). If the undiscounted cash flows used in the test
for recoverability are less than the long-lived assets
(group’s) carrying amount, the Company will then determine
the fair value of the long- lived asset (group) and recognize an
impairment loss, if any, if the carrying amount of the long-lived
asset (group) exceeds its fair value. For the year ended December
31, 2018, the Company recorded a loss on impairment of intangible
assets related to the Company’s acquisitions of
BeautiControl, Inc. and Future Global Vision, Inc. and recorded a
loss on impairment of intangible assets of approximately $2,550,000
and $625,000, respectively. While these charges had no impact on
the Company’s business operations, cash balances or operating
cash flows, they resulted in significant losses during the
reporting periods. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the
Company determined that there were indicators of impairment present
for long-lived assets related to the Company’s commercial
hemp segment, as result a test for recoverability concluded that
the carrying amount of the long-lived asset (group) did not exceed
its fair value. As a result, the Company recorded a loss on
impairment of intangible assets related to the acquisition of
Khrysos Global of approximately $8,461,000. (See Note
2)
Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded as the excess, if any, of the aggregate fair
value of consideration exchanged for an acquired business over the
fair value (measured at the acquisition date) of total net tangible
and identified intangible assets acquired. In accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic
350, “Intangibles —
Goodwill and Other”, goodwill and other intangible assets with
indefinite lives are not amortized but are tested for impairment on
an annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be
recoverable. The Company conducts annual reviews for goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets in the fourth quarter or
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amounts of the assets may not be fully
recoverable.
The Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether
it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that
goodwill is impaired. The testing is generally performed at the
“reporting unit” level. A reporting unit is the
operating segment, or a business one level below that operating
segment (referred to as a component) if discrete financial
information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management at the
component level. The Company has determined that its reporting
units for goodwill impairment testing are the Company’s
reportable segments. After considering the totality of events and
circumstances, the Company determines whether it is more likely
than not that goodwill is not impaired. If impairment is
indicated, the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the
reporting unit’s fair value is recognized as a goodwill
impairment, however, the loss recognized should not exceed the
total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting
unit.
The Company first assess qualitative factors to determine
whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill
impairment test. If the qualitative assessment determines it is
necessary, the Company the performs a quantitative impairment test
shall be used to identify goodwill impairment and measure the
amount of a goodwill impairment loss to be recognized (if any).
The Company determined no impairment
of its goodwill occurred for the year ended December 31,
2018. At the end of 2019 the Company’s qualitative
testing determined that a quantitative test was not required for
its direct selling segment and its commercial coffee segment. The
Company’s quantitative testing for its commercial hemp
segment led the Company to recognize an impairment loss of
$6,831,000.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company reviews the terms of convertible debt and equity
instruments it issues to determine whether there are derivative
instruments, including an embedded conversion option that is
required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as a
derivative financial instrument. In circumstances where a host
instrument contains more than one embedded derivative instrument,
including a conversion option, that is required to be bifurcated,
the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a
single, compound derivative instrument. In connection with the
Company’s private placements, the Company may issue warrants
to purchase shares of its common stock and record embedded
conversion features which are accounted for as derivative
liabilities, rather than as equity.
The Company recognizes and measures the warrants and the
embedded conversion features in accordance with ASC Topic
815, Derivatives and
Hedging. The accounting
guidance sets forth a two-step model to be applied in determining
whether a financial instrument is indexed to an entity’s own
stock, which would qualify such financial instruments for a scope
exception. This scope exception specifies that a contract that
would otherwise meet the definition of a derivative financial
instrument would not be considered as such if the contract is both
(i) indexed to the entity’s own stock and
(ii) classified in the stockholders’ equity section of
the entity’s balance sheet. The Company determined
that certain warrants and embedded conversion features issued in
the Company’s private placements are ineligible for equity
classification due to anti-dilution provisions set forth
therein.
Derivative liabilities are recorded at their estimated fair value
at the issuance date and are revalued at each subsequent reporting
date. The Company will continue to revalue the derivative liability
on each subsequent balance sheet date until the securities to which
the derivative liabilities relate are exercised or expire. (See
Note 8)
Various factors are considered in the pricing models the Company
uses to value the derivative liabilities, including its current
stock price, the remaining life, the volatility of its stock price,
and the risk-free interest rate. Future changes in these factors
may have a significant impact on the computed fair value of the
liability. As such, the Company expects future changes in the fair
values to continue and may vary significantly from period to
period. The warrant and embedded liability and revaluations
have not had a cash impact on working capital, liquidity or
business operations.
The discount from the face value of the convertible acquisition
debt, together with the stated interest on the instrument, is
amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges
to interest expense, using the effective interest
method.
The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures
to cash flow, market or foreign currency.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value measurements are performed in accordance with the
guidance provided by ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures.” ASC
Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received
from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or
parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where
observable prices or parameters are not available, valuation models
are applied.
ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an
entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the
use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Assets and
liabilities recorded at fair value in the financial statements are
categorized based upon the hierarchy of levels of judgment
associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value.
Hierarchical levels directly related to the amount of subjectivity
associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and
liabilities, are as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to
access.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included
in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by
observable market data.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supportable by little
or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of
the asset or liability.
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments,
including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities, finance lease obligations and
deferred revenue approximate their fair values based on their
short-term nature. The carrying amount of the Company’s
long-term notes payable approximates its fair value based on
interest rates available to the Company for similar debt
instruments and similar remaining maturities.
The fair value of the contingent acquisition debt is evaluated each
reporting period using projected revenues, discount rates, and
projected timing of revenues. Projected contingent payment amounts
are discounted back to the current period using a discount rate.
Projected revenues are based on the Company’s most recent
internal operational budgets and long-range strategic plans.
Increases in projected revenues will result in higher fair value
measurements. Increases in discount rates and the time to payment
will result in lower fair value measurements. Changes in any of
those inputs in isolation may result in a significantly different
fair value measurement.
The estimated fair value of the Company’s contingent
acquisition debt and warrant derivative liabilities is recorded
using significant unobservable measures and other fair value inputs
and is therefore classified as a Level 3 financial
instrument.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue from product sales when the
following five steps are completed: i) Identify the contract with
the customer; ii) Identify the performance obligations in the
contract; iii) Determine the transaction price; iv) Allocate the
transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract;
and v) Recognize revenue when (or as) each performance obligation
is satisfied. (See Note 4)
Revenue is recognized upon transfer of control of promised products
or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those
products or services. The Company enters into contracts that can
include various combinations of products and services, which are
generally capable of being distinct and accounted for as separate
performance obligations. Revenue is recognized net of allowances
for returns and any taxes collected from customers, which are
subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.
The transaction price for all sales is based on the price reflected
in the individual customer's contract or purchase order.
Variable consideration has not been identified as a significant
component of the transaction price for any of our
transactions.
Independent distributors receive compensation which is recognized
as distributor compensation in the Company’s consolidated
statements of operations. Due to the short-term nature of the
contract with the customers, the Company accrues all distributor
compensation expense in the month earned and pays the compensation
the following month.
The Company also charges fees to become a distributor, and earn a
position in the network genealogy, which are recognized as revenue
in the period received. The Company’s distributors are
required to pay a one-time enrollment fee and receive a welcome kit
specific to that country or region that consists of forms, policy
and procedures, selling aids, access to our distributor website and
a genealogy position with no down line distributors.
The
Company has determined that most contracts will be completed in
less than one year. For those transactions where all performance
obligations will be satisfied within one year or less, the Company
is applying the practical expedient outlined in ASC 606-10-32-18.
This practical expedient allows the Company not to adjust promised
consideration for the effects of a significant financing component
if the Company expects at contract inception the period between
when the Company transfers the promised good or service to a
customer and when the customer pays for that good or service will
be one year or less. For those transactions that are expected to be
completed after one year, the Company has assessed that there are
no significant financing components because any difference between
the promised consideration and the cash selling price of the good
or service is for reasons other than the provision of
financing.
Deferred Revenues and Costs
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the balance in deferred revenues was
approximately $1,943,000 and $2,312,000, respectively. Deferred
revenue related to the Company’s direct selling segment is
attributable to the Heritage Makers product line and for future
Company convention and distributor events.
Deferred revenues related to Heritage Makers were approximately
$1,795,000 and $2,153,000 at December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively. The deferred revenue represents Heritage
Maker’s obligation for points purchased by customers that
have not yet been redeemed for product. Cash received for points
sold is recorded as deferred revenue. Revenue is recognized when
customers redeem the points and the product is
shipped.
Deferred costs relate to Heritage Makers prepaid commissions that
are recognized in expense at the time the related revenue is
recognized. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the balance in deferred
costs was approximately $254,000 and $364,000, respectively, and
was included in prepaid expenses and other current
assets.
Deferred revenues related to pre-enrollment in upcoming conventions
and distributor events of approximately $148,000 and $159,000
at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, relate primarily to
the Company’s 2020 and 2019 events. The Company does not
recognize revenue until the conventions or distributor events have
occurred.
Product Return Policy
All products, except food products and commercial coffee products
are subject to a full refund within the first 30 days of receipt by
the customer, subject to an advance return authorization procedure.
Returned product must be in unopened resalable condition. At both
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had an allowance related to
product returns of $125,000 which is recorded with the direct
selling segment. Commercial coffee products are returnable only if
defective. Product returns for all three segments as a percentage
of our net sales during 2019 were less than 2% of our annual net
sales.
Shipping and Handling
Shipping and handling costs associated with inbound freight and
freight to customers, including independent distributors, are
included in cost of revenues. Shipping and handling fees charged to
customers are included in sales. Shipping expense was approximately
$8,179,000 and $8,801,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and
2018, respectively.
Distributor Compensation
In the direct selling segment, the Company utilizes a network of
independent distributors, each of whom has signed an agreement with
the Company, enabling them to purchase products at wholesale
prices, market products to customers, enroll new distributors for
their down-line and earn compensation on product purchases made by
those down-line distributors and customers.
The payments made under the compensation plans are the only form of
compensation paid to the distributors. Each product has a point
value, which may or may not correlate to the wholesale selling
price of a product. A distributor must qualify each month to
participate in the compensation plan by making a specified amount
of product purchases, achieving specified point levels. Once
qualified, the distributor will receive payments based on a
percentage of the point value of products sold by the
distributor’s downline. The payment percentage varies
depending on the qualification level of the distributor and the
number of levels of down-line distributors. There are also
additional incentives paid upon achieving predefined activity and
or down-line point value levels. There can be multiple levels of
independent distributors earning incentives from the sales efforts
of a single distributor. Due to the multi-layer independent sales
approach, distributor incentives are a significant component of the
Company’s cost structure. The Company accrues all distributor
compensation expense in the month earned and pays the compensation
the following month.
Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable
to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is
computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders
by the sum of the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the period and the weighted-average number of
dilutive common share equivalents outstanding during the period,
using the treasury stock method. Dilutive common share equivalents
are comprised of stock options, restricted stock, warrants,
convertible preferred stock and common stock associated with the
Company's convertible notes based on the average stock price for
each period using the treasury stock method. Potentially dilutive
shares are excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per
share when their effect is anti-dilutive.
In periods where a net loss is presented, all potentially dilutive
securities are anti-dilutive and are excluded from the computation
of diluted net loss per share. Potentially dilutive securities for
the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were 11,916,270 and
9,128,489, respectively, detailed as follows:
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Warrants
|
6,238,182
|
5,876,980
|
Preferred
stock conversions
|
275,931
|
274,990
|
Principal
conversions on convertible notes
|
312,571
|
107,140
|
Stock
options
|
4,637,642
|
2,394,379
|
Restricted
stock units
|
451,944
|
475,000
|
Total
|
11,916,270
|
9,128,489
|
The
calculation of diluted loss per share requires that, to the extent
the average market price of the underlying shares for the reporting
period exceeds the exercise price of the warrants and the presumed
exercise of such securities are dilutive to loss per share for the
period, an adjustment to net loss used in the calculation is
required to remove the change in fair value of the warrants, net of
tax from the numerator for the period. Likewise, an adjustment to
the denominator is required to reflect the related dilutive shares,
if any, under the treasury stock method. During the year ended
December 31, 2019, the Company recorded a valuation gain on the
fair value of the warrant derivative liability net of tax of
approximately $1,543,000 which had a dilutive impact on the loss
per share.
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Loss per Share - Basic
|
|
|
Numerator
for basic loss per share
|
$(52,668,000)
|
$(23,497,000)
|
Denominator
for basic loss per share
|
29,264,132
|
21,589,226
|
Loss
per common share – basic
|
$(1.80)
|
$(1.09)
|
|
|
|
Loss per Share - Diluted
|
|
|
Numerator
for basic loss per share
|
$(52,668,000)
|
$(23,497,000)
|
Adjust:
Fair value of dilutive warrants outstanding
|
(1,543,000)
|
–
|
Numerator
for diluted loss per share
|
$(54,211,000)
|
$(23,497,000)
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for basic loss per share
|
29,264,132
|
21,589,226
|
Plus:
Incremental shares underlying “in the money” warrants
outstanding
|
20,932
|
–
|
Denominator
for diluted loss per share
|
29,285,064
|
21,589,226
|
Loss
per common share - diluted
|
$(1.85)
|
$(1.09)
|
Foreign Currency Translation
The financial position and results of operations of the
Company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using each
foreign subsidiary’s local currency as the functional
currency. Revenues and expenses of such subsidiaries have been
translated into U.S. dollars at average exchange rates prevailing
during the period. Assets and liabilities have been translated at
the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date. The resulting
translation gain and loss adjustments are recorded directly as a
separate component of stockholders’ equity, unless there is a
sale or complete liquidation of the underlying foreign
investments. Translation gains or losses resulting from
transactions in currencies other than the respective entities
functional currency are included in the determination of income and
are not considered significant to the Company for the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net gains and losses
affecting stockholders’ equity that, under GAAP are excluded
from net income (loss). For the Company, the only items are the
cumulative foreign currency translation and net income
(loss).
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC
Topic 740, "Income Taxes,"
under the asset and liability method
which includes the recognition of deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that
have been included in the consolidated financial statements. Under
this approach, deferred taxes are recorded for the future tax
consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities are recovered or paid. The provision for income
taxes represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year
plus the change in deferred taxes during the year. Deferred taxes
result from differences between the financial statement and tax
basis of assets and liabilities and are adjusted for changes in tax
rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. The effects of future
changes in income tax laws or rates are not
anticipated.
The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States
(“U.S.”) and certain foreign jurisdictions. The
calculation of the Company’s tax provision involves the
application of complex tax laws and requires significant judgment
and estimates. The Company evaluates the realizability of its
deferred tax assets for each jurisdiction in which it operates at
each reporting date and establishes a valuation allowance when it
is more likely than not that all or a portion of its deferred tax
assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred
tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable
income of the same character and in the same jurisdiction. The
Company considers all available positive and negative evidence in
making this assessment, including, but not limited to, the
scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future
taxable income, and tax planning strategies. In circumstances where
there is sufficient negative evidence indicating that deferred tax
assets are not more likely than not realizable, the Company will
establish a valuation allowance.
ASC 740 requires that all tax positions be evaluated using a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. Differences between tax
positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the
financial statements are recorded as adjustments to income taxes
payable or receivable, or adjustments to deferred taxes, or both.
The Company believes that its accruals for uncertain tax positions
are adequate for all open audit years based on its assessment of
many factors including past experience and interpretation of tax
law. To the extent that new information becomes available, which
causes the Company to change its judgment about the adequacy of its
accruals for uncertain tax positions, such changes will impact
income tax expense in the period such determination is made. The
Company’s policy is to include interest and penalties related
to unrecognized income tax benefits as a component of income tax
expense.
In December 2017, H.R.1, known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
(the "TCJA") was signed into law and included widespread changes to
the Internal Revenue Code (the “IRC”) including, among
other items, creation of new taxes on certain foreign earnings, a
deduction for certain export sales by a domestic C corporation, a
minimum tax on certain related party expenses and transactions. The
TCJA subjects certain U.S. shareholders to current tax on global
intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI") earned by certain foreign
subsidiaries. Conversely, foreign-derived intangible income
("FDII") will be taxed at a lower effective rate than the statutory
rate by allowing a tax deduction against the income. In addition to
GILTI and FDII, Congress passed the base erosion and anti-abuse tax
as part of the TCJA, which will impose a 5% effective tax rate on
corporations by disallowing certain related party expenses and
transactions and eliminating any associated foreign tax credits. We
have considered these new provisions as they are effective for tax
years starting after December 31, 2017 but determined that none
will likely apply for fiscal year 2019.
Among other things, the TCJA reduced the U.S. federal corporate tax
rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018, required companies to pay a
one-time transition tax on previously unremitted earnings of
non-U.S. subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred, and
created new taxes on certain foreign sourced earnings. The
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) staff
issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 118, which
provided guidance on accounting for enactment effects of the TCJA.
SAB 118 provided a measurement period of up to one year from the
TCJA’s enactment date for companies to complete their
accounting under ASC 740. In accordance with SAB 118, to the extent
that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of
the TCJA is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable
estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in its financial
statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to
be included in its financial statements, it should continue to
apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that
were in effect immediately before the enactment of the
TCJA.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance
with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock
Compensation,” which
establishes accounting for equity instruments exchanged for
services from employees and non-employees. Under such provisions,
stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based
on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an
expense net of forfeitures, under the straight-line method, over
the vesting period of the equity grant. Forfeitures are recorded as
they occur.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes to estimate the fair value of
stock options. The use of a valuation model requires the Company to
make certain assumptions with respect to selected model inputs.
Expected volatility is calculated based on the historical
volatility of the Company’s stock price over
the expected term of the option. The expected life is based on
the contractual life of the option and expected employee
exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior. The
risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon
issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life assumed at
the date of the grant.
Other Income (Expense)
The Company records interest income, interest expense, and change
in derivative liabilities, as well as other non-operating
transactions, as other income (expense) on our consolidated
statements of operations.
Reclassification of Prior Year
Results
Certain prior year results reported in the consolidated statement
of operations deemed not to be material, have not been reclassified
within the 2018 prior year results and therefore will not reflect
the current year presentation. The Company has determined that the
reclassification would have no impact on the consolidated balance
sheet, the reported net loss in the consolidated statement of
operations, consolidated statements of stockholders' equity and on
the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.
2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic
820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements
for Fair Value Measurement.
Topic 820 removes or modifies certain current disclosures and
adds additional disclosures. The changes are meant to provide more
relevant information regarding valuation techniques and inputs used
to arrive at measures of fair value, uncertainty in the fair value
measurements, and how changes in fair value measurements impact an
entity's performance and cash flows. Certain disclosures
in Topic 820 will need to be applied on a retrospective
basis and others on a prospective basis. Topic 820 is
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted upon issuance.
The Company adopted the provisions of
this guidance early on January 1, 2019 and the adoption of this
standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
In June
2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation
(Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployees Share-Based
Payment Accounting. The intention of ASU 2018-07 is to
expand the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment
transactions in exchange for goods and services from nonemployees.
These share-based payments will now be measured at grant-date fair
value of the equity instrument issued. Upon adoption, only
liability-classified awards that have not been settled and
equity-classified awards for which a measurement date has not been
established should be remeasured through a cumulative-effect
adjustment to retained earnings at the beginning of the fiscal year
of adoption. Topic 718 was effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2018. The Company
adopted the provisions of this guidance on January 1, 2019 and the
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive
Income (Topic 220), Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Topic 220. The
amendments in this Update allow a reclassification from accumulated
other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax
effects resulting from the TCJA. Consequently, the amendments
eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA and will improve the usefulness of
information reported to financial statement users. However, because
the amendments only relate to the reclassification of the income
tax effects of the TCJA, the underlying guidance that requires that
the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income
from continuing operations is not affected. The amendments in this
Update also require certain disclosures about stranded tax effects.
Topic 220 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within
those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted the provisions of this
guidance on January 1, 2019 and the adoption of this standard did
not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In July
2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing
Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic
815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite
Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of
Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable
Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. Topic 260
allows companies to exclude a down round feature when determining
whether a financial instrument (or embedded conversion feature) is
considered indexed to the entity’s own stock. As a result,
financial instruments (or embedded conversion features) with down
round features may no longer be required to be classified as
liabilities. A company will recognize the value of a down round
feature only when it is triggered, and the strike price has been
adjusted downward. For equity-classified freestanding financial
instruments, such as warrants, an entity will treat the value of
the effect of the down round, when triggered, as a dividend and a
reduction of income available to common shareholders in computing
basic earnings per share. For convertible instruments with embedded
conversion features containing down round provisions, entities will
recognize the value of the down round as a beneficial conversion
discount to be amortized to earnings. The guidance in Topic 260 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and
interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is
permitted, and the guidance is to be applied using a full or
modified retrospective approach. The Company adopted Topic 260, Topic 480 and Topic
815 effective January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective
approach. The new guidance requires companies to exclude any down
round feature when determining whether a freestanding equity-linked
financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) is considered
indexed to the entity’s own stock when applying the
classification guidance in ASC 815-40. Upon adoption of the new
guidance, existing equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded
conversion options) with down round features must be reassessed as
liability classification may no longer be required. As a result,
the Company determined in regard to its 2018 warrants the
appropriate treatment of these warrants that were initially
classified as derivative liabilities should now be classified as
equity instruments. The Company determined that the liability
associated with the 2018 warrants should be remeasured and adjusted
to fair value on the date of the change in classification with the
offset to be recorded through earnings and then the fair value of
the warrants should be reclassified to equity. The Company
recorded the change in the fair value of the 2018 warrants as of
the date of change in classification to earnings. The fair value of
the 2018 warrants in the amount of $1,494,000 at the date of change
in classification was reclassified from warrant derivative
liability to additional paid in capital as a result of the change
in classification of the warrants. (See Note 8)
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic
350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. This ASU
simplifies the test for goodwill impairment by removing Step 2 from
the goodwill impairment test. Companies will now perform the
goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting
unit with its carrying amount, recognizing an impairment charge for
the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting
unit’s fair value not to exceed the total amount of goodwill
allocated to that reporting unit. An entity still has the option to
perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to
determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The
amendments in this update are effective for goodwill impairment
tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 for public companies, with early
adoption permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed after
January 1, 2017. The Company adopted
the provisions of this guidance on January 1, 2019 and the adoption
of this standard did not have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements. (See Notes 1 and
5)
In February
2016, FASB established
Topic 842, Leases, by issuing ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic
842) which required
lessees to recognize leases on-balance sheet and disclose key
information about leasing arrangements.
Topic 842 was
subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical
Expedient for Transition to Topic 842; ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to
Topic 842, Leases; ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted
Improvements; ASU No.
2018-20, Narrow-Scope Improvements for
Lessors; and ASU
2019-01, Codification
Improvements. The new standard
establishes a right-of-use model (ROU) that requires a lessee to
recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for
all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases are classified as finance or
operating, with classification affecting the pattern and
classification of expense recognition in the income statement. The
amendments were adopted by the
Company on January 1,
2019. A modified
retrospective transition approach is required, applying the
standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application.
The Company elects to use its effective date as its date of initial
application. Consequently, financial information
will not be
updated, and the disclosures required under the new standard
will not be
provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019. The new standard provides a number of optional
practical expedients in transition. The Company elected the
“package of practical expedients”, which permits the
Company not to reassess under the new standard prior conclusions
about lease identification, lease classification and initial
direction costs. In addition, the Company elected the practical
expedient to use hindsight when determining lease terms. The
practicable expedient pertaining to land easement is not applicable
to the Company. The Company continues to assess all of the effects
of adoption, with the most significant effect relating to the
recognition of new ROU assets and lease liabilities on the
Company’s consolidated balance sheet for real estate
operating leases. The
Company adopted the provisions of this guidance on January 1, 2019
and accordingly recognized additional operating liabilities of
approximately $5,509,000
with corresponding ROU assets of the same amount based on the
present value of the remaining minimum rental payments under
current leasing standards for existing operating
leases.
The
Company does not believe that any recently issued effective
pronouncements, or pronouncements issued but not yet effective, if
adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
Note 2. Acquisitions and Business Combinations
During 2019 and 2018, the Company entered into a total of four
acquisitions which are detailed below. The acquisitions were
conducted to allow the Company to enter into the hemp market and
expand the Company’s distributor network within the direct
selling segment, enhance and expand its product portfolio, and
diversify its product mix. As a result of the Company’s
business combinations, the Company’s distributors and
customers will have access to the acquired company’s products
and the acquired company’s distributors and customers will
gain access to products offered by the Company.
As such, the major purpose for the business combinations was to
increase revenue and profitability. The acquisitions were
structured as asset purchases which resulted in the recognition of
certain intangible assets.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company adjusted the
preliminary purchase price for one of its 2017 acquisitions which
resulted in an adjustment to the related intangibles and contingent
debt in the amount of $629,000. In addition, during the year ended
December 31, 2018, the Company removed the contingent debt
associated with the Nature’s Pearl acquisition from 2016 due
to a breach of the asset purchase agreement by Nature's Pearl and
amended certain terms of the existing agreement. As a result, the
Company is no longer obligated under the related asset purchase
agreement to make payments. During the year ended December 31,
2018, the Company recorded a reduction to the acquisition debt for
Nature’s Pearl in the amount of approximately $1,246,000 with
a corresponding credit to general and administrative expense in the
statements of operations.
2019 Acquisitions
BeneYOU
On October 31, 2019, the Company entered into an asset purchase
agreement with an effective date of November 1, 2019, with BeneYOU,
LLC, a Utah limited liability company (“BeneYOU”), and
Ryan Anderson (the “BeneYOU Representing Party”), for
the Company to acquire certain assets of BeneYOU including all of
the outstanding equity of BeneYOU Holding, LLC, a Utah limited
liability company (“BeneYOU Holding”), collectively
“BeneYOU”. In accordance with the asset purchase
agreement, the Company also acquired BeneYOU’s customer and
distributor organization lists, all intellectual property, product
formulations, products, product packaging, product registrations,
licenses, marketing materials, sales tools and swag, and all
saleable inventory. BeneYOU’s flagship brand Jamberry has an
extensive line of nail products with a core competency in social
selling, and two other brands including Avisae which focuses on the
gut health and the M.Global brand of products that includes
hydration products.
The Company is obligated to make monthly payments based on a
percentage of the BeneYOU
distributor revenue derived from sales of the Company’s
products and a percentage of royalty revenue derived from sales of
BeneYOU products until the earlier of the date that is ten years
from the closing date or such time as the Company has paid to
BeneYOU aggregate cash payments of the BeneYOU distributor revenue
and royalty revenue equal to the maximum aggregate purchase price
of $3,500,000. In addition, the Company paid an acquisition
liability payment of $200,000 on the closing date, which reduced
the maximum aggregate purchase price to $3,300,000.
The contingent consideration’s estimated fair value at the
date of acquisition was approximately $2,648,000
as determined by management using a
discounted cash flow methodology. The acquisition related costs,
such as legal costs and other professional fees were minimal and
expensed as incurred.
The purchase agreement contains customary representations,
warranties and covenants of the Company, BeneYOU and the BeneYOU
Representing Party. Subject to certain customary limitations the
BeneYOU Representing Party have agreed to indemnify the Company and
BeneYOU against certain losses related to, among other things,
breaches of the BeneYOU Representing Party’s representations
and warranties, certain specified liabilities and the failure to
perform covenants or obligations under the purchase
agreement.
The Company recorded the fair value (in thousands) at the date of
acquisition of the acquired tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities as follows:
Contingent
consideration
|
$2,648
|
Aggregate purchase
price
|
$2,648
|
The
following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in November 2019 (in
thousands):
Current assets
(excluding inventory)
|
$408
|
Inventory (net of
$469 reserve)
|
441
|
Trademarks and
trade name
|
343
|
Distributor
organization
|
1,175
|
Customer
relationships
|
44
|
Non-compete
agreement
|
277
|
Goodwill
|
669
|
Current
liabilities
|
(709)
|
Net assets
acquired
|
$2,648
|
The estimated fair value of intangible assets acquired of
$1,839,000 was determined through the use of a third-party
valuation firm using various income and cost approach
methodologies. Specifically, the intangibles identified in the
acquisition were trademarks and trade name, distributor
organization, customer relationships and non-compete agreement and
are being amortized over their estimated useful life of 5 years, 9
years, 5 years and 4 years, respectively. The straight-line method
is being used and is believed to approximate the timeline within
which the economic benefit of the underlying intangible asset will
be realized.
Goodwill of $669,000 was recognized as the excess purchase price
over the acquisition-date fair value of net assets acquired.
Goodwill is estimated to represent the synergistic values expected
to be realized from the combination of the two businesses. The
goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax
purposes.
Revenues from BeneYOU included in the consolidated statement of
operations within the direct selling segment for the year ended
December 31, 2019 were approximately $1,989,000.
The pro-forma effect assuming the business combination with
BeneYOU discussed above had occurred
at the beginning of the year is not presented as the information
was not available.
Khrysos Global, Inc.
On February 12, 2019, the Company and KII entered into an asset and
equity purchase agreement (the “AEPA”) with Khrysos
Global, and Leigh Dundore and Dwayne Dundore (collectively, the “Khrysos
Representing Party”), for KII to acquire substantially all
the assets of Khrysos Global and all the outstanding equity of INXL
and INXH. The collective business manufactures proprietary systems
to provide end-to-end extraction and processing that allow for the
conversion of hemp feed stock into hemp oil and hemp
extracts.
The aggregate consideration payable for the assets of Khrysos
Global and the equity of INXL and INXH of $16,000,000 is to be paid
as set forth under the terms of the AEPA and allocated between
Khrysos Global and Leigh Dundore in such manner as they determine
at their discretion.
At closing, Khrysos Global and the Khrysos Representing Party
received an aggregate of 1,794,972 shares of the Company’s
common stock. In addition, the Company agreed to pay the sellers
$1,500,000 in cash towards the AEPA of which $1,000,000 was paid to
Khrysos Global and the Khrysos Representing Party during 2019, and
the remaining cash payment of $500,000 is to be paid in 2020. At
December 31, 2019, the Company’s remaining liability of
$500,000 was outstanding and recorded as accrued expenses on the
consolidated balance sheet.
In conjunction with the acquisition and organization of KII, the
Company retained Dwayne Dundore as President of KII. Previously
agreed-upon equity compensation in the form of warrants that was to
be provided as part of the closing to Dwayne Dundore by the Company
were terminated as a result of Mr. Dundore’s acceptance as an
employee with the Company. Effective September 17, 2020, Mr.
Dundore was no longer employed with KII or the
Company.
The AEPA contains customary representations, warranties and
covenants of the Company, Khrysos Global and the Khrysos
Representing Party. Subject to certain customary limitations
Khrysos Global and the Khrysos Representing Party have agreed to
indemnify the Company and KII against certain losses related to,
among other things, breaches of the Khrysos Representing
Party’s representations and warranties, certain specified
liabilities and the failure to perform covenants or obligations
under the AEPA.
Restatement Note - related to the Acquisition of Khrysos Global,
Inc.
In conjunction with the Company’s 2019 annual audit the
Company concluded that certain fixed assets acquired in the
acquisition and the share price valuation for the common stock
issued as consideration were not fairly valued as of the closing
date February 12, 2019 which resulted in a decrease to the net
assets acquired including; a) $1,127,000 related to the certain
fixed assets, and b) $1,351,000 related to a change in the fair
value of common stock issuance resulting in an increase to goodwill
of $2,478,000 acquired and an adjusted aggregate purchase price of
$15,894,000. The Company intends to restate its quarterly reports
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2019, three and
six months ended June 30, 2019, and for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2019.
The Company has estimated fair value at the date of acquisition of
the acquired tangible and intangible assets and liabilities as
follows including the resulting adjustments in changes to the
aggregate purchase price (in thousands):
|
Consideration
as Originally Reported
|
Adjustments
|
Consideration as Currently Reported
|
Present value of
cash consideration
|
$1,894
|
$
|
$1,894
|
Estimated fair
value of common stock issued
|
12,649
|
1,351
|
14,000
|
Aggregate purchase
price
|
$14,543
|
$1,351
|
$15,894
|
The
following table summarizes the estimated and as adjusted fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in February
2019 (in thousands):
|
Fair
Value as Originally Reported
|
Adjustments
|
Fair Value as Currently Reported
|
Current
assets
|
$636
|
$-
|
$636
|
Inventory
|
1,264
|
-
|
1,264
|
Property, plant and
equipment
|
2,260
|
(1,127)
|
1,133
|
Trademarks and
trade name
|
1,876
|
-
|
1,876
|
Customer-related
intangible
|
5,629
|
-
|
5,629
|
Non-compete
intangible
|
956
|
-
|
956
|
Goodwill
|
4,353
|
2,478
|
6,831
|
Current
liabilities
|
(1,904)
|
-
|
(1,904)
|
Notes
payable
|
(527)
|
-
|
(527)
|
Net assets
acquired
|
$14,543
|
$1,351
|
$15,894
|
The reported fair value of intangible assets acquired in the amount
of $8,461,000 was determined through the use of a third-party
valuation firm using various income and cost approach
methodologies. Specifically, the intangibles identified in the
acquisition were trademarks and trade name, customer
relationships and non-compete
agreement. The trademarks and trade name,
customer relationships and
non-compete agreement are being amortized over their estimated
useful life of 8 years, 4 years and 6 years, respectively. The
straight-line method is being used and is believed to approximate
the timeline within which the economic benefit of the underlying
intangible asset will be realized. In connection with the
Company’s annual impairment test in 2019, the net book value
of intangible assets of $8,461,000 was determined to be impaired.
(See Note 5)
Goodwill
acquired as currently reported of $6,831,000 is recognized as the
excess purchase price over the acquisition-date fair value of net
assets acquired. In connection with the Company’s annual
impairment test in 2019, the full amount of goodwill recognized of
$6,831,000 was determined to be impaired. (See Note
5)
The costs related to the acquisition are included in legal and
accounting fees and were expensed as incurred.
Revenues from KII included in the consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 were approximately
$887,000.
The pro-forma effect assuming the business combination with KII
discussed above had occurred at the beginning of the year is not
presented as the information was not available.
2018 Acquisitions
Doctor’s Wellness Solutions Global LP
(ViaViente)
On
March 1, 2018, the Company
acquired certain assets of Doctor’s Wellness Solutions Global
LP (“ViaViente”).
ViaViente is the distributor of The ViaViente Miracle, a highly
concentrated, energizing whole fruit puree blend that is rich in
antioxidants and naturally occurring vitamins and
minerals.
The Company is obligated to make monthly payments based on a
percentage of the ViaViente
distributor revenue derived from sales of the Company’s
products and a percentage of royalty revenue derived from sales of
ViaViente’s products until the earlier of the date that is
five years from the closing date or such time as the Company has
paid to ViaViente aggregate cash payments of the ViaViente
distributor revenue and royalty revenue equal to the maximum
aggregate purchase price of $3,000,000. In addition, the Company
entered into an inventory consignment agreement whereby the Company
agreed to pay an additional royalty fee on specific inventory items
up to $750,000. The $750,000 is in addition to the $3,000,000
aggregate purchase price and is included in the estimated fair
value of the contingent debt. The inventory consignment royalty
fees are applied to the maximum aggregate purchase
price.
The contingent consideration’s estimated fair value at the
date of acquisition was $1,375,000 as determined by management
using a discounted cash flow methodology. The acquisition related
costs, such as legal costs and other professional fees were minimal
and expensed as incurred.
The assets acquired were recorded at estimated fair values as of
the date of the acquisition. During the year ended December 31,
2018, the Company reviewed the initial valuation of $1,375,000 and
reduced it by $749,000. The contingent liability was also reduced
by $749,000.
The revenue impact from the ViaViente acquisition, included in the
consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December
31, 2018 was approximately $1,542,000.
The pro-forma effect assuming the business combination with
ViaViente discussed above had occurred
at the beginning of the year is not presented as the information
was not available.
Nature Direct
On
February 12, 2018, the Company
acquired certain assets and liabilities of Nature Direct. Nature
Direct, is a manufacturer and distributor of essential oil based
nontoxic cleaning and care products for personal, home and
professional use.
The Company is obligated to make monthly payments based on a
percentage of the Nature Direct distributor revenue derived from sales of the
Company’s products and a percentage of royalty revenue
derived from sales of the Nature Direct products until the earlier of the date that is
twelve years from the closing date or such time as the Company has
paid to Nature Direct aggregate
cash payments of the Nature Direct distributor revenue and royalty revenue equal to
the maximum aggregate purchase price of
$2,600,000.
The contingent consideration’s estimated fair value at the
date of acquisition was $1,085,000 as determined by management
using a discounted cash flow methodology. The acquisition related
costs, such as legal costs and other professional fees were minimal
and expensed as incurred. The Company received approximately
$90,000 of inventories from Nature Direct and paid for the
inventory and assumed liabilities of $50,000. This payment is
applied to the maximum aggregate purchase price.
The assets acquired were recorded at estimated fair values as of
the date of the acquisition. During the year ended December 31,
2018, the Company reviewed the initial valuation of $1,085,000 and
reduced it by $560,000. The contingent liability was also reduced
by $560,000.
The revenue impact from the Nature Direct acquisition, included in the consolidated
statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 was
approximately $1,308,000.
The pro-forma effect assuming the business combination with
Nature Direct discussed above had
occurred at the beginning of the year is not presented as the
information was not available.
Contingent Acquisition Debt
The Company’s contingent acquisition debt at December 31,
2019 and 2018 was approximately $8,611,000 and $8,261,000,
respectively, and was attributable to debt associated with the
Company’s direct selling segment.
Note 3. Agreements with Variable Interest Entities and Related
Party Transactions
FDI Realty, LLC
FDI Realty, LLC (“FDI Realty”) is the owner and lessor
of the building previously partially occupied by the Company for
its sales and marketing office in Windham, NH until December 2015.
A former officer of the Company is the single member of FDI
Realty.
At December 31, 2017 the Company believed it held a variable
interest in FDI Realty, for which the Company was not deemed to be
the primary beneficiary. The Company concluded, based on its
qualitative consideration of the terminated lease agreement, and
the role of the single member of FDI Realty, that the single member
is the primary beneficiary of FDI Realty. In making these
determinations, the Company considered that the single member
conducts and manages the business of FDI Realty, is authorized to
borrow funds on behalf of FDI Realty, is the sole person authorized
and responsible for conducting the business of FDI Realty and is
obligated to fund the obligations of FDI Realty. The Company
believed it was a co-guarantor of FDI Realty’s mortgages on
the building, however, at December 31, 2017, the Company determined
that the fair value of the guarantees was not significant and
therefore did not record a related liability.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company determined
that based on the current circumstances as it relates to certain
agreements existing among the Company and FDI Realty, including but
not limited to an amended and restated equity purchase agreement
which was executed in October 2011 and FDI Realty’s failure
to meet its obligations under the amended purchase agreement, the
Company no longer holds a variable interest in FDI
Realty.
Other Related Party Transactions
Hernandez, Hernandez, Export Y Company and H&H Coffee Group
Export Corp.
The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, CLR, is associated
with Hernandez, Hernandez, Export Y Company
(“H&H”), a Nicaragua company, through sourcing
arrangements to procure Nicaraguan grown green coffee beans. As
part of the 2014 Siles acquisition, CLR engaged the owners of
H&H, Alain Piedra Hernandez (“Mr. Hernandez”) and
Marisol Del Carmen Siles Orozco (“Ms. Orozco”), as
employees to manage Siles.
H&H is a sourcing agent that purchases raw green coffee beans
from the local producers in Nicaragua and supplies CLR’s mill
with unprocessed green coffee for processing. CLR does not have a
direct relationship with the local producers and is dependent on
H&H to negotiate agreements with local producers for the supply
and provide to CLR’s mill raw unprocessed green coffee to CLR
in a timely and efficient manner. In addition, CLR’s largest
customer for green coffee beans was H&H Export during the year
ended December 31, 2019. In consideration for H&H's sourcing of
green coffee for processing within CLR’s mill, CLR and
H&H share in the green coffee profit from milling
operations.
CLR made purchases from H&H Export of
approximately $9,891,000 of unprocessed green coffee for the year
ended December 31, 2018, that approximated 45%, of total
coffee segment purchases for use in
selling processed green coffee to other third parties and for use
in CLR’s Miami roasting facilities. CLR did not have any
purchases of unprocessed green coffee from H&H Export during
the year ended December 31, 2019.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, CLR recorded net revenues
from green coffee milling and processing services of approximately
$6,416,000 and during the year ended December 31, 2018 recorded
revenues from sales of processed green coffee beans of $3,938,000,
to H&H Export. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, CLR's accounts
receivable balance for customer related revenue from H&H Export
were $8,707,000 and $673,000, respectively, of which the full
amount was past due at December 31, 2019. As a result, the
Company has reserved $7,871,000 as bad debt related to
H&H’s accounts receivable balance, which was net of collections through
December 31, 2020. (See Note
11)
In addition, the Company has collaborated with H&H, the
Company’s green coffee supplier and H&H Export, and other
third parties in Nicaragua to develop a sourcing solution by
entering into the Finance, Security and Accounts
Receivable/Accounts Payable Monetization Agreement (the “FSRP
Agreement”.) The FSRP Agreement is designed to provide the
Company with access to a continued supply of unprocessed green
coffee beans for the 2020 growing season and a solution for funding
of the continued operations of the Company’s green coffee
distribution business. Under the FSRP Agreement, management has
assessed the collectability of accounts receivable from H&H
Export.
The Company initially expected that through this agreed upon
financing arrangement that the Company would collect the
outstanding accounts receivable balance in full during the 2020
growing season. However, given the COVID crisis’ impact on
the 2020 growing season and the continued delay in full payment of
the 2019 receivable balances, management considers the H&H
Export receivable impaired at December 31, 2019.
Advance
In
December 2018, CLR advanced $5,000,000 to H&H Export to provide
services in support of a five-year contract for the sale and
processing of 41 million pounds of green coffee beans on an annual
basis. The services include providing hedging and financing
opportunities to producers and delivering harvested coffee to the
Company’s mills. In March 2019, this advance was
converted to a $5,000,000 loan agreement as a note receivable and
bears interest at 9.00% per annum and is due and payable by H&H
Export at the end of each year’s harvest season, but no later
than October 31 for any harvest year. In October 2019, CLR and
H&H Export amended the March 2019 agreement in terms of the
maturity date such that all outstanding principal and interest is
due and payable at the end of the 2020 harvest (or when the 2020
season’s harvest was exported and collected), but never to be
later than November 30, 2020.
Management reviewed the security against the loan and the impact of
the underlying COVID crisis and determined that the full amount of
the note receivable including interest of approximately $5,340,000,
was not collected as of December 31, 2020, and therefore $5,340,000
was recognized as an allowance for collectability at the end of
December 31, 2019.
Mill Construction Agreement between CLR and H&H
In
January 2019, to accommodate CLR’s green coffee purchase
contract, CLR entered into a mill construction agreement with
H&H and H&H Export, Mr. Hernandez and Ms. Orozco, together
with H&H, collectively referred to as the Nicaraguan Partner,
pursuant to which the Nicaraguan Partner agreed to transfer a
45-acre tract of land in Matagalpa, Nicaragua (the “Matagalpa
Property”) to be owned 50% by the Nicaraguan Partner and 50%
by CLR. In consideration for the land acquisition the Company
issued to H&H Export, 153,846 shares of common stock.
The fair value of the shares issued
was $1,200,000 and was based on the stock price on the date of
issuance of the shares. In addition, the Nicaraguan Partner
and CLR agreed to contribute $4,700,000 each toward construction of
a processing plant, office, and storage facilities on the Matagalpa
Property (collectively the “Matagalpa Mill”) for
processing coffee in Nicaragua. The addition of the mill will
accommodate CLR’s green coffee contract
commitments.
For the
years ended December 31, 2019 CLR made payments of approximately $2,150,000 and $900,000
during the year ended December 31, 2018 in advance of the
agreement, towards the Matagalpa Mill project. In addition,
$391,117 was paid for operating equipment in 2019.
At
December 31, 2019, CLR contributed a total of $3,441,000 towards
the Matagalpa Mill project, which is included in construction in
process within property and equipment, net on the Company's
consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2019, the Nicaraguan
Partner contributed a total of $1,922,000 towards the Matagalpa
Mill project. CLR’s remaining portion of $1,650,000 was paid
during 2020, in addition $912,606 was paid for operating equipment.
At December 31, 2019, the Matagalpa Mill was in construction and
was not ready for full operations.
During 2019, the Company issued 295,910 shares of common stock to
H&H Export to pay for certain working capital, construction and
other payables. In connection with the issuance, the Company over
issued 121,649 shares of common stock, resulting in the net
issuance of common stock to settle payables of 174,261 shares.
H&H Export agreed to reimburse CLR for the over issuance of the
121,649 shares of common stock in cash. At December 31, 2019, the
value of the shares was approximately $397,000 based on the stock
price at December 31, 2019. Management reviewed the amount due in
conjunction with the impact of the underlying COVID crisis and has
determined that the receivable balance of $397,000, was more than
likely to be uncollected as of December 31, 2019, and therefore the
full amount was recognized as an allowance for collectability at
December 31, 2019.
Amended Operating and Profit-Sharing Agreement between CLR and
H&H
In
January 2019, CLR entered into an amendment to the March 2014
operating and profit-sharing agreement with the owners of
H&H. In addition, CLR and H&H,
Mr. Hernandez and Ms. Orozco restructured their profit-sharing
agreement in regard to profits from green coffee sales and
processing that increased CLR’s profit participation by an
additional 25%. Under the new terms of the agreement with respect
to profit generated from green coffee sales and processed from La
Pita, a leased mill, or the Matagalpa Mill, now will provide for a split of profits of 75% to
CLR and 25% to the Nicaraguan Partner, after certain conditions are
met. Profit-sharing
expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $1,060,000
compared to a profit-sharing benefit of $910,000 in the same period
last year, which is included in accrued expenses on the
Company’s balance sheets.
In addition, H&H Export sold to CLR its espresso brand
Café Cachita in consideration of the issuance of 100,000
shares of the Company’s common stock in January 2019. The
shares of common stock issued were valued at $7.50 per
share.
Joint Venture Agreement in Nicaragua for Hemp Processing Center
between the CLR and KII and Nicaraguan partner
On April 20 and July 29, 2020, CLR and KII (the U.S.
Partners) entered into agreements (“Hemp Joint Venture
Agreement”) with H&H Export and Fitracomex, Inc. (“Fitracomex”)
(collectively “The Nicaraguan Partners”) and
established the hemp joint venture (the “Nicaraguan Hemp Grow
and Extractions Group” or the “Hemp Joint
Venture”).
The
agreement calls for H&H Export to contribute the 2,200-acre
Chaguitillo Farms in Sebaco-Matagalpa, Nicaragua which will be
owned by H&H Export and the U.S. Partners on a 50/50 basis
separate from the Hemp Joint Venture.
The
agreement calls for Nicaraguan Partners to contribute the
excavation and preparation for hemp growth of the 2,200 acres,
installation of electrical service, and the construction of 45,000
square feet of buildings to be used for office, processing,
storage, drying and green house space.
The
U.S. Partners will contribute all the necessary extraction
equipment to convert hemp to crude oil and will also provide the
feminized hemp seeds for the pilot grow program, along with their expertise in the hemp
business. The U.S. Partners will also provide all necessary
working capital as required.
Additionally,
the U.S. Partners’ parent company Youngevity International
Inc., subject to the approval of The Nasdaq Stock Market
(“Nasdaq”) agreed to issue 1,500,000 shares of its
restricted common stock, par value per share, to Fitracomex. In
accordance with the Hemp Joint Venture Agreement, in July 2020 the
Parent Company issued to Fitracomex the agreed upon shares of
restricted common stock. The U.S. Partners agreed to issue warrants
to Fitracomex for the purchase 5,000,000 shares of the Parent
Company common stock at an exercise price of US $1.50, exercisable
for a term of five (5) years after completion of the construction and upon the approval by the
Parent Company’s stockholders of the proposed
issuance. In addition, the U.S. Partners agreed to use
its best efforts to register the resale of the shares of the Parent
Company’s common stock to Fitracomex under the U.S.
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and make
any necessary applications with Nasdaq to list the
shares.
The
U.S. Partners and H&H Export will serve as the managing
partners with all business decisions will require prior consent and
agreement of both parties. The Net Profits and Net Losses for each
fiscal period shall be allocated among the partners as follows:
twenty five percent (25%) to the Nicaraguan Partners and seventy
five percent (75%) to the U.S. Partners.
Master Relationship Agreement
In March 2021, CLR entered into a Master Relationship Agreement
(“MA Agreement”) with the owners of H&H in order to
memorialize the various agreements and modifications to those
agreements. Additionally, certain events have occurred that have
kept the parties from complying with the terms of each of the
original agreements and have caused there to be an imbalance with
the respect to the funds owed by one party to the other; therefore
this MA Agreement also sets forth a detailed accounting of the
different business relationships and reconciles the monetary
obligations between each party through the end of fiscal year
2020.
This MA Agreement memorialized the key
settlement terms and established that H&H owes CLR
approximately $10,700,000, described as “H&H Coffee
Liability”, that is composed of:
●
past due accounts
receivable owed to CLR from H&H for 2019 and 2020;
●
the $5,000,000 note
due plus accrued interest on the note;
●
CLR lost profits in
2019 and 2020;
●
the return of
working capital provided by CLR for the 2019 and 2020 green coffee
program.
The MA
Agreement also includes an offset against amounts owed by H&H
to CLR consisting of:
●
H&H’s 25%
profit sharing participation for 2019 and 2020;
●
and an offset of
H&H’s open payables owed by CLR to H&H in the amount
of approximately $243,000.
The MA
Agreement provides that approximately $10,700,000 is owed to CLR by
H&H and H&H agrees to satisfy this obligation by providing
CLR a minimum of 20 containers of strictly high grown coffee
(approximately 825,000 pounds of coffee) per month, commencing at
the end of March 2021 and continuing monthly until the aforesaid
amount is paid in full. The MA Agreement stipulates that the
parties have agreed that the coffee to be provided to CLR by
H&H for the shipments described above, that in order to satisfy
H&H’s debt to CLR, shall not be produced on any
plantation that the parties have a joint interest in. CLR has
recorded allowances of $7,871,000 related to the H&H trade
accounts receivable $5,340,000 related to the H&H notes
receivable during the year ended December 31, 2019 due to
H&H’s repayment history and risks associated with
redemption of the receivable in coffee.
Other Agreement between CLR and H&H
In May 2017, CLR entered a settlement agreement, as amended, with
Mr. Hernandez who was issued a warrant for the purchase of 75,000
shares of our common stock at a price of $2.00 with an expiration
date of three years, in lieu of an obligation due from CLR to
H&H as relates to a sourcing and supply agreement with H&H
and H&H Export. The warrants were outstanding at both December
31, 2019 and 2018.
Related Party Transactions
Richard Renton
Richard
Renton was a member of the board of directors until February 11,
2020 and owns and operates WVNP, Inc., a supplier of certain
inventory items sold by the Company. The Company made
purchases of approximately $228,000 and $151,000 from WVNP Inc.,
for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
In addition, Mr. Renton is a distributor of the Company and was
paid distributor commissions for the years ended December 31, 2019
and 2018 of approximately $366,000 and $363,000,
respectively.
Carl Grover
Carl Grover was the sole beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the
Company’s outstanding common shares and beneficial owner of
3,293,643 shares of common stock at December 31, 2019.
In July
2019, Mr. Grover acquired 600,242 shares of the Company's common
stock upon the partial exercise at $4.60 per share of a 2014
warrant to purchase 782,608 shares of common stock held by him. In
connection with such exercise, the Company received approximately
$2,761,000 from Mr. Grover, issued to Mr. Grover 50,000 shares of
restricted common stock as an inducement fee and agreed to extend
the expiration date of the July 2014 warrant held by him to
December 15, 2020, and the exercise price of the warrant was
adjusted to $4.75 with respect to 182,366 shares of common stock
remaining for exercise thereunder.
In December 2018, CLR entered into a credit agreement with Mr.
Grover pursuant to which CLR borrowed $5,000,000 from Mr. Grover
and in exchange issued to him a $5,000,000 credit note. In
addition, Siles, as guarantor, executed a separate Guaranty
Agreement (“Guaranty”). In connection with the
credit agreement, the Company issued
to Mr. Grover a four-year warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of its
common stock, exercisable at $6.82 per share, and a four-year
warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock, exercisable at $7.82 per share, pursuant to a warrant
purchase agreement with Mr. Grover. At December 31, 2019, the
balance of the borrowing from the credit agreement with Mr. Grover
was approximately $4,085,000, net of debt discounts. (See Note
6)
Mr. Grover held the following warrants exercisable into an
aggregate of 2,248,975 shares of common stock at December 31, 2019:
(i) a 2014 warrant exercisable for 182,366 shares of common stock, (ii) a 2015 warrant
exercisable for 200,000 shares of common stock, (iii) three 2017
warrants exercisable for an aggregate of 735,030 shares of common
stock, (iv) a 2018 warrant exercisable for 631,579 shares of common
stock, and (v) two 2018 warrants exercisable for an aggregate of
500,000 shares of common stock.
In addition, Mr. Grover owned 2,986,908 shares of common stock at
December 31, 2019 which included: (i) 1,122,233 shares issued from
the conversion of his 2017 PIPE Notes to common stock, (ii) 428,571
shares issued from the conversion of his 2015 Note to common stock,
(iii) 747,664 shares issued from the conversion of his 2014 PIPE
Notes to common stock, (iv) 650,242 shares from the partial
exercise and inducement shares issued with the exercise of the 2014
warrants, and (v) 38,198 shares of common stock. (See Note
7)
Paul Sallwasser
Mr. Paul Sallwasser is a member of the board directors and prior to
joining the Company’s board of directors he acquired in the
Company’s 2014 private placement, a note in the principal
amount of $75,000 convertible into 10,714 shares of common stock
and a warrant exercisable for 14,673 shares of common stock. Mr.
Sallwasser additionally acquired in the Company’s 2017
private placement, a note in the principal amount of $38,000
convertible into 8,177 shares of common stock and a warrant issued
to purchase 5,719 shares of common stock. Mr. Sallwasser also
acquired, as part of the 2017 private placement in exchange for the
2015 note that he acquired in the Company’s 2015 private
placement, an additional 2017 note in the principal amount of
$5,000 convertible into 1,087 shares of common stock and a 2017
warrant exercisable for 543 shares of common stock.
In March 2018, the Company completed its Series B offering and in
accordance with the terms of the 2017 notes, Mr. Sallwasser’s
2017 notes converted to 9,264 shares of the Company’s common
stock. Mr. Sallwasser’s aggregate 2017 warrants of to
purchase 6,262 shares of common stock remained outstanding at
December 31, 2019.
In
August 2019, Mr. Sallwasser acquired 14,673 shares of the Company's
common stock upon the exercise of his 2014 warrant. In connection
with the exercise, Mr. Sallwasser applied approximately $67,000 of
the proceeds of his 2014 note due to him from the Company as
consideration for the warrant exercise. The warrant exercise
proceeds to the Company would have been approximately $67,000. The
Company paid the balance owed to him under his 2014 note including
accrued interest of approximately $8,000.
At December 31, 2019, Mr. Sallwasser owned 76,924 shares of common
stock and options to purchase an aggregate of 116,655 shares of
common stock, which are immediately exercisable.
2400 Boswell LLC
In March 2013, the Company acquired 2400 Boswell for approximately
$4,600,000. 2400 Boswell is the owner and lessor of the building
occupied by the Company for its corporate office and warehouse in
Chula Vista, California. The purchase was from an immediate family
member of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and consisted
of approximately $248,000 in cash, approximately $334,000 of debt
forgiveness and accrued interest, and a promissory note of
approximately $393,000, payable in equal payments over 5 years and
bears interest at 5.0%. Additionally, the Company assumed a
long-term mortgage of $3,625,000, payable over 25 years with an
initial interest rate of 5.75%. The interest rate is the prime rate
plus 2.5%. The current interest rate as of December 31, 2019 was
7.5%. The lender will adjust the interest rate on the first
calendar day of each change period. The Company and its Chief
Executive Officer are both co-guarantors of the mortgage. As of
December 31, 2019, the balance on the long-term mortgage is
approximately $3,143,000 and the balance on the promissory note is
zero.
JJL Equipment Holding, LLC
In connection with the acquisition of Khrysos Global, the Company
held a deposit of $233,000 on December 31, 2019 from JJL Equipment
Holding, LLC (“JJL Equipment”) for an equipment
purchase. Temple Leigh Dundore, a member of the Khrysos
Representing Party and wife of Dwayne Dundore, who was the
President of KII through September 2020, is a member and part owner
of JJL Equipment. The deposit is to be applied to future machinery
and equipment orders from JJL Equipment and is recorded in other
current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December
31, 2019.
Daniel J. Mangless
Daniel J. Mangless, was a beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of
the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock due to his
beneficial ownership of 1,780,000 shares of common stock at
December 31, 2019 which included 63,000 shares of common stock
issued from the conversion of his Series C convertible preferred
stock to common stock, and 63,000 shares of common stock issued
from the exercise of his December 2018 warrant, 250,000 shares of
common stock issued from his February 2019 securities purchase
agreement, 250,000 shares of common stock issued from his June 2019
securities purchase agreement, and 904,000 shares of common stock
held by him at December 31, 2019. Mr. Mangless also owns a February
2019 warrant exercisable for 250,000 shares of common stock which
he acquired in connection with a February 2019 securities purchase
agreement. During 2021, Mr. Mangless liquated some of his
Youngevity common stock and is no longer a beneficial owner of in
excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of common
stock.
In February 2019, the Company entered into a securities purchase
agreement with Mr. Mangless pursuant to which the Company sold
250,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of $7.00 per
share. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the Company also issued
Mr. Mangless a three-year warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $7.00. The Company received
proceeds of $1,750,000 from the stock offering. (See Note
10)
In June 2019, the Company entered into a second securities purchase
agreement with Mr. Mangless pursuant to which the Company sold
250,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of $5.50 per
share. The Company received proceeds of $1,375,000 from the stock
offering. (See Note 10)
Note 4. Revenues
Following the expiration of the Company’s EGC status on
December 31, 2018 the Company adopted ASC Topic 606,
Revenue from
Contracts with Customer (“Topic 606”) on January 1, 2018 using
the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which
were not completed as of January 1, 2018.
There was no impact to retained earnings at January 1, 2018, or to
revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018, after adopting Topic
606, as revenue recognition and timing of revenue did not change as
a result of implementing Topic 606.
Revenue Recognition
Direct Selling. Direct
distribution sales are made through the Company’s network
(direct selling segment), which is a web-based global network of
customers and distributors. The Company’s independent sales
force markets a variety of products to an array of customers,
through friend-to-friend marketing and social networking. The
Company considers itself to be an e-commerce company whereby
personal interaction is provided to customers by its independent
sales network. Sales generated from direct distribution includes;
health and wellness, beauty product and skin care, scrap booking
and story booking items, packaged food products and other
service-based products.
Revenue is recognized when the Company satisfies its performance
obligations under the contract. The Company recognizes revenue by
transferring the promised products to the customer, with revenue
recognized at shipping point, the point in time the customer
obtains control of the products. The majority of the
Company’s contracts have a single performance obligation and
are short term in nature. Sales taxes in domestic and foreign
jurisdictions are collected from customers and remitted to
governmental authorities, all at the local level, and are accounted
for on a net basis and therefore are excluded from
revenues.
Commercial Coffee - Roasted Coffee. The Company engages in the commercial sale of
roasted coffee through CLR, which is sold under a variety of
private labels through major national sales outlets and to
customers including cruise lines and office coffee service
operators, and under its own Café La Rica brand, Josie’s
Java House Brand, Javalution brands and Café Cachita as well
as through its distributor network within the direct selling
segment.
Revenue is recognized when the title and risk of loss is passed to
the customer under the terms of the shipping arrangement,
typically, FOB shipping point. At this point the customer has a
present obligation to pay, takes physical possession of the
product, takes legal title to the product, bears the risks and
rewards of ownership, and as such, revenue will be recognized at
this point in time. Sales taxes in domestic and foreign
jurisdictions are collected from customers and remitted to
governmental authorities, all at the local level, and are accounted
for on a net basis and therefore are excluded from
revenues.
Commercial Coffee - Green Coffee. The commercial coffee segment includes the sale of
green coffee beans, which are sourced from the Nicaraguan
rainforest.
Revenue is recognized when the title and risk of loss is passed to
the customer under the terms of the shipping arrangement,
typically, FOB shipping point. At this point the customer has a
present obligation to pay, takes physical possession of the
product, takes legal title to the product, bears the risks and
rewards of ownership, and as such, revenue will be recognized at
this point in time. Revenues where the Company sells green coffee
beans that it has milled and where the Company has determined it is
the agent with regard to the green coffee beans is recorded at net
or recorded to reflect only the milling services provided. Sales
taxes in domestic and foreign jurisdictions are collected from
customers and remitted to governmental authorities, all at the
local level, and are accounted for on a net basis and therefore are
excluded from revenues.
Commercial Hemp. In the
commercial hemp segment, the Company manufactures commercial
hemp-based CBD extraction and post-processing equipment, and
end-to-end processor of CBD isolate, distillate, water soluble
isolate and water-soluble distillate. The Company develops,
manufactures and sells equipment and related services to customers
which enable them to extract CBD oils from hemp stock. The Company
provides hemp growers, feedstock suppliers, and CBD crude oil
producers the use of equipment, intellectual capital, production
consultancy, tolling services, and wholesale CBD channel sales
capabilities. The Company is also engaged in hemp-based CBD
extraction technology including tolling processing which converts
hemp biomass to hemp extracts such as CBD oil, distillate and
isolate. The Company offers customers turnkey manufacturing
solutions in extraction services and end-to-end processing systems.
In addition, the Company owns a laboratory testing facility that
provides a broad range of capabilities in regard to formulation,
quality control, and testing standards with our CBD products,
including potency analysis for the Company’s supply partners
of hemp derived CBD products.
Revenue is recognized when the title and risk of loss is passed to
the customer under the terms of the shipping arrangement,
typically, FOB shipping point. At this point the customer has a
present obligation to pay, takes physical possession of the
product, takes legal title to the product, bears the risks and
rewards of ownership, and as such, revenue will be recognized at
this point in time. Sales taxes in domestic and foreign
jurisdictions are collected from customers and remitted to
governmental authorities, all at the local level, and are accounted
for on a net basis and therefore are excluded from
revenues.
Disaggregated Revenue
The following table summarizes disaggregated revenue by segment (in
thousands):
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Direct
selling
|
$127,011
|
$138,855
|
Processed
green coffee
|
1,046
|
12,281
|
Milling
and processing services
|
6,416
|
–
|
Roasted
coffee and other
|
12,082
|
11,309
|
Commercial
coffee
|
19,544
|
23,590
|
Commercial
hemp
|
887
|
–
|
Total
|
$147,442
|
$162,445
|
Contract Balances
Timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of
invoicing to customers. The Company records contract assets when
performance obligations are satisfied prior to
invoicing.
Contract liabilities are reflected as deferred revenues in current
liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and
includes deferred revenue and customer deposits. Contract
liabilities relate to payments invoiced or received in advance of
completion of performance obligations and are recognized as revenue
upon the fulfillment of performance obligations. Contract
Liabilities are classified as short-term as all performance
obligations are expected to be satisfied within the next twelve
months.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, deferred revenues were approximately
$1,943,000 and $2,312,000, respectively. The Company records
deferred revenue related to its direct selling segment which is
primarily attributable to the Heritage Makers product line and
represents Heritage Maker’s obligation for points purchased
by customers that have not yet been redeemed for product. In
addition, deferred revenues include future Company convention and
distributor events.
Of the
deferred revenue at December 31, 2018, the Company recognized
revenue of approximately $1,549,000 from the Heritage Makers
product line and approximately $228,000 from the Company’s
convention and distributor events during the year ended December
31, 2019. No deferred revenues were recognized with the commercial
coffee or the commercial hemp segment for the year ended December
31, 2019.
As part of the adoption of the ASC Topic 606, the Company elected
to use the practical expedient to account for shipping and handling
activities as fulfillment costs, which are recorded in cost of
revenues.
Note 5. Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet
Information
Accounts Receivable, net
Net accounts receivable consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Accounts
receivable
|
$11,142
|
$4,263
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(8,240)
|
(235)
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
$2,902
|
$4,028
|
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, CLR's accounts receivable balance
for customer related revenue by H&H Export were approximately
$8,707,000 and $673,000, respectively, of which the full amount was
past due at December 31, 2019. As a result, we have reserved
$7,871,000 as bad debt related to the accounts receivable balance
at December 31, 2019 which is net of collections through
December 31, 2020. (See Note
11)
Inventory
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Finished
goods
|
$14,890
|
$11,300
|
Raw
materials
|
11,694
|
12,744
|
Total
inventory
|
26,584
|
24,044
|
Reserve
for excess and obsolete inventory
|
(3,878)
|
(2,268)
|
Inventory,
net
|
$22,706
|
$21,776
|
The inventory reserve amount for excess and obsolete inventory as
of December 31, 2019, includes the addition of approximately
$469,000 acquired in the Company’s acquisition of BeneYOU LLC
(See Note 2.) Excluding, the addition of BeneYou, LLC the change in
the Company’s reserve for excess and obsolete inventory is
$1,141,000.
Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Building
|
$4,789
|
$3,879
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
2,948
|
3,024
|
Land
|
3,307
|
2,544
|
Land
improvements
|
606
|
606
|
Producing
coffee trees
|
553
|
553
|
Manufacturing
equipment
|
9,568
|
5,825
|
Furniture
and other equipment
|
2,050
|
1,885
|
Computer
software
|
1,420
|
1,420
|
Computer
equipment
|
2,648
|
2,665
|
Vehicles
|
326
|
222
|
Construction
in process
|
6,562
|
1,966
|
Total property and
equipment, gross
|
34,777
|
24,589
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(11,461)
|
(9,484)
|
Total
property and equipment, net
|
$23,316
|
$15,105
|
Depreciation expense totaled approximately $2,134,000 and
$1,819,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
Operating and Financing Leases
The Company’s operating and financing lease assets and
liabilities recognized within its consolidated balance sheets were
classified as follows (in thousands):
|
December 31,
2019
|
Assets
|
|
Operating
lease right-of-use assets
|
$8,386
|
Finance lease right-of-use assets
(1)
|
10,521
|
Total
lease assets
|
$18,907
|
Liabilities
|
|
Operating
lease liabilities, current portion
|
$1,740
|
Finance
lease liabilities, current portion
|
736
|
Total
lease liabilities, current portion
|
2,476
|
Operating
lease liabilities, net of current portion
|
6,646
|
Finance
lease liabilities, net of current portion
|
408
|
Total
lease liabilities
|
$9,530
|
(1)
|
Finance lease right-of-use assets are recorded within property and
equipment, net of accumulated amortization of approximately
$1,367,000 at December 31, 2019.
|
Operating and finance lease costs were as follows (in
thousands):
Lease Cost
|
Classification
|
December 31,
2019
|
Operating
lease cost
|
Sales
and marketing, general and administrative
|
$1,508
|
Finance
lease cost:
|
|
|
Amortization
of leased assets
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
712
|
Interest
on lease liabilities
|
Interest
expense, net
|
128
|
Total
operating and finance lease cost
|
|
$2,348
|
Operating lease cost for the year ended December 31, 2018 was
approximately $1,475,000.
Scheduled annual lease payments were as follows (in
thousands):
|
Operating
Leases
|
Finance
Leases
|
Years
ending December 31:
|
|
|
2020
|
$2,159
|
$807
|
2021
|
1,900
|
387
|
2022
|
1,464
|
17
|
2023
|
969
|
13
|
2024
|
637
|
7
|
Thereafter
|
2,921
|
2
|
Total
lease payments
|
10,050
|
1,233
|
Less
imputed interest
|
(1,664)
|
(89)
|
Present
value of lease liabilities
|
$8,386
|
$1,144
|
The weighted-average remaining lease term and weighted-average
discount rate used to calculate the present value of lease
liabilities are as follows:
Lease Term and Discount Rate
|
December 31,
2019
|
Weighted-average
remaining lease term (in years)
|
|
Operating
leases
|
6.8
|
Finance
leases
|
1.6
|
Weighted-average
discount rate
|
|
Operating
leases
|
5.47%
|
Finance
leases
|
4.57%
|
Assets
Intangible assets consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
December 31, 2019
|
December 31, 2018
|
||||
|
Cost
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Net
|
Cost
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Net
|
Distributor
organizations
|
$15,735
|
$10,418
|
$5,317
|
$14,559
|
$9,575
|
$4,984
|
Trademarks
and trade names
|
8,430
|
2,539
|
5,891
|
7,337
|
1,781
|
5,556
|
Customer
relationships
|
10,442
|
6,413
|
4,029
|
10,398
|
5,723
|
4,675
|
Internally
developed software
|
720
|
657
|
63
|
720
|
558
|
162
|
Non-compete
agreement
|
277
|
11
|
266
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Intangible
assets
|
$35,604
|
$20,038
|
$15,566
|
$33,014
|
$17,637
|
$15,377
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was approximately
$2,401,000 and $2,879,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and
2018, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded a loss
on impairment of intangible assets related to the acquisition of
Khrysos Global of approximately $8,461,000. (See Note
2)
At December 31, 2019, future expected amortization expense related
to definite lived intangible
assets was as follows (in thousands):
Years
ending December 31,
|
|
2020
|
$2,439
|
2021
|
2,358
|
2022
|
2,336
|
2023
|
2,257
|
2024
|
1,638
|
Thereafter
|
2,889
|
Total
|
$13,917
|
The weighted-average remaining amortization period for intangibles
assets at December 31, 2019 was approximately 5.3
years.
Trademarks and trade names, which do not have legal, regulatory,
contractual, competitive, economic, or other factors that limit the
useful lives are considered indefinite lived assets and are not
amortized but are tested for impairment on an annual basis or
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. At December
31, 2019 and 2018, approximately $1,649,000 in trademarks and
tradenames from business combinations have been identified as
having indefinite lives.
During
the year ended December 31, 2018, the
Company also determined that the underlying intangible assets
associated with its BeautiControl, Inc. and Future Global Vision,
Inc., acquisitions were impaired and recorded a loss on impairment
of intangible assets in our direct selling segment of approximately
$3,175,000.
Goodwill
Goodwill activity by reportable segment consists of the following
(in thousands):
|
Direct
Selling
|
Commercial Coffee
|
Commercial Hemp
|
Total
|
Balance
at December 31, 2018
|
$3,009
|
$3,314
|
$–
|
$6,323
|
Goodwill
recognized
|
669
|
–
|
6,831
|
7,500
|
Loss
on impairment of goodwill
|
–
|
–
|
(6,831)
|
(6,831)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2019
|
$3,678
|
$3,314
|
$–
|
$6,992
|
Based on results of the 2019 annual goodwill impairment test, the
Company recorded a loss on impairment of goodwill of $6,831,000
which represented the full amount of goodwill recognized in
connection with the acquisition of Khrysos Global in February 2019.
The impairment was driven by a decline in the estimated fair value
primarily due to the reduction in the profitability forecasts, as
well as increased working capital requirements which increased the
commercial hemp segment’s carrying value. (See Note
2)
A
hybrid method valuation approach was used to determine the fair
value of the commercial hemp segment which included (i) the income
approach (also referred to as a discounted cash flow or DCF), which
is dependent upon estimates for future revenue, operating income,
depreciation and amortization, income tax payments, working capital
changes, and capital expenditures, as well as, expected long-term
growth rates for cash flows; (ii) the guideline public company
method, which uses valuation metrics from similar publicly-traded
companies, and (iii) the transactional method, which compares
valuation results from other businesses that have recently been
sold or acquired in the same industry. All of these approaches are
affected by economic conditions related to industry as well as
conditions in the U.S. capital markets.
To
determine fair value, the income approach method, guideline public
company method and transactional method were weighted 50%, 25% and
25%, respectively. The three methods returned value indications
that were supportive of one another and corroborative of the value
conclusion.
The
fair value measurement was calculated using unobservable inputs to
the discounted cash flow method, which are classified as Level 3
within the fair value hierarchy under GAAP. The key assumptions
used to estimate the fair values of the commercial hemp segment
were:
●
Discount
rates;
●
Compounded
annual revenue growth rates;
●
Average
operating margins;
●
Terminal
value capitalization rate (capitalization rate); and
●
Guideline
company valuations.
Of the
key assumptions, the discount rates and the capitalization rate are
market driven. These rates are derived from the use of market data
and employment of the capital asset pricing model. The
Company-dependent key assumptions are the compounded annual revenue
growth rates and the average operating margins and are subject to
much greater influence from the Company’s actions. The
Company used discount rates that are commensurate with the risk and
uncertainty inherent in the commercial hemp segment and in its
internally developed forecasts. Actual results may differ from
those assumed in the forecasts and changes in assumptions or
estimates could materially affect the determination of the fair
value of a reporting unit, and therefore could affect the amount of
potential impairment.
Inherent
in the development of the present value of future cash flow
projections are assumptions and estimates derived from a review of
the Company’s expected revenue growth rates, profit margins,
business plans, cost of capital, and tax rates. The Company also
makes assumptions about future market conditions, market prices,
interest rates, and changes in business strategies. Changes in
assumptions or estimates could materially affect the determination
of the fair value of a reporting unit and, therefore, could
eliminate the excess of fair value over the carrying value of a
reporting unit entirely and, in some cases, could result in
impairment.
The Company determined no impairment of its goodwill occurred for
the year ended December 31, 2018.
Note 6. Notes Payable and Line of Credit
Credit Note
In December 2018, CLR entered into a credit agreement
(“Credit Note”) with Mr. Grover pursuant to which CLR
borrowed $5,000,000 from Mr. Grover and in exchange issued to him a
$5,000,000 Credit Note. In addition,
CLR’s subsidiary Siles, as guarantor, executed a separate
Guaranty Agreement (“Guaranty”). The
Credit Note is secured by CLR’s green coffee inventory,
subordinate to certain debt owed to Crestmark Bank and pari passu with certain holders of
notes issued by the borrowers of the company in 2014. At both
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the outstanding principal balance of
the Credit Note was $5,000,000. As of the date of this filing, CLR
is in default regarding the settlement terms of the Credit Note and
the Credit Note remains outstanding; however, demand for payment
has not been made.
The
credit note accrues interest at 8.00% per annum and is paid
quarterly. All principal and accrued interest under the credit note
is due and payable on December 12, 2020. The credit note contains
customary events of default including the Company or Siles failure
to pay its obligations, commencing bankruptcy or liquidation
proceedings, and breach of representations and warranties. Upon the
occurrence of an event of default, the unpaid balance of the
principal amount of the credit note together with all accrued but
unpaid interest thereon, may become, or may be declared to be, due
and payable by Mr. Grover and shall bear interest from the due date
until such amounts are paid at the rate of 10.00% per annum. In
connection with the credit agreement, the Company issued to Mr.
Grover a four-year warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of its common
stock, exercisable at $6.82 per share (“Warrant 1”),
and a four-year warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of its common
stock, exercisable at $7.82 per share (“Warrant
2”).
In
connection with the credit note, the Company also entered into an
advisory agreement with a third party not affiliated with Mr.
Grover, pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay to the advisor
a 3.00% fee on the transaction with Mr. Grover and issued to the
advisor’s designee a four-year warrant to purchase 50,000
shares of the Company’s common stock, exercisable at $6.33
per share.
The Company recorded debt discounts of approximately $1,469,000
related to the fair value of warrants issued in the transaction and
$175,000 of transaction issuance costs both of which are amortized
to interest expense over the life of the credit note. The Company
recorded amortization of approximately $699,000 and $30,000 related
to the debt discount and issuance cost during the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. At December 31, 2019 and
2018, the combined remaining balance of the debt discounts and
issuance cost was approximately $915,000 and $1,614,000,
respectively.
Promissory Notes
In
March 2019, the Company entered into a two-year secured promissory
note (“Note” or “Notes”) with two
accredited investors that had a substantial pre-existing
relationship with the Company pursuant to which the Company raised
cash proceeds in the aggregate of $2,000,000. The Notes pay interest at a rate of 8.00% per
annum and interest is paid quarterly in arrears with all principal
and unpaid interest due at maturity on March 18, 2021. At
December 31, 2019, the outstanding principal balance of the Notes
was $2,000,000. The promissory notes
are secured by all equity in KII.
On
February 18, 2021, the Company entered into amendment agreements
extending the Notes, see Note 14 for further discussion. As of the
date of this filing the Notes remain outstanding and the Company is
in default of the terms of settlement set forth in the amendment
agreements.
In
conjunction with the promissory note, the Company also issued
20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for each
$1,000,000 invested and a five-year warrant to purchase 20,000
shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $6.00
per share for each $1,000,000
invested. The Company issued in the aggregate 40,000 shares of
common stock and 40,000 warrants with the
Notes.
The Company recorded debt discounts of approximately $212,000
related to transaction issuance costs and $139,000 related to the
fair value of warrants issued in the transaction both of which are
amortized to interest expense over the life of the promissory
notes. The Company recorded amortization of approximately $123,000
related to the debt discount and issuance cost related to the
promissory notes during the year ended December 31, 2019. At
December 31, 2019, the combined remaining balance of the debt
discount and issuance costs was approximately
$228,000.
2400 Boswell Mortgage Note
In March 2013, the Company acquired 2400 Boswell for approximately
$4,600,000. 2400 Boswell is the owner and lessor of the building
occupied by the Company for its corporate office and warehouse in
Chula Vista, California. The purchase was from an immediate family
member of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and consisted
of approximately $248,000 in cash, approximately $334,000 of debt
forgiveness and accrued interest, and a promissory note of
approximately $393,000, payable in equal payments over 5 years and
bears interest at 5.0%. Additionally, the Company assumed a
long-term mortgage of $3,625,000, payable over 25 years with an
initial interest rate of 5.75%. The interest rate is the prime rate
plus 2.5%. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the interest rate was
7.50% and 7.75%, respectively. The lender will adjust the interest
rate on the first calendar day of each change period. The Company
and its Chief Executive Officer are both co-guarantors of the
mortgage. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the balance on the
long-term mortgage was approximately $3,143,000 and $3,217,000,
respectively, and the balance on the promissory note is
zero.
Khrysos Mortgage Notes
In conjunction with the Company’s acquisition of Khrysos
Global, the Company assumed an interest only mortgage for
properties located in Clermont, FL in the amount of $350,000 with
all principal due in September 2021 and interest paid monthly at a
rate of 8.00% per annum. In addition, the Company assumed a
mortgage of approximately $177,000 for properties located in
Mascotte, FL with all unpaid principal due in June 2023 and
interest paid monthly at a rate of 7.00% per annum. At December 31,
2019, the aggregate outstanding principal balance on the mortgages
was approximately $528,000.
In February 2019, the Company purchased a 45-acre tract of land in
Groveland, FL (“Groveland”), for $750,000, which is
intended to host a research and development facility, a greenhouse
and allocate a portion for farming. The Company paid $300,000 as a
down payment and assumed a mortgage of $450,000. Unpaid principal
is due in February 2024 and interest is paid monthly at a rate of
6.00% per annum. At December 31, 2019, the remaining mortgage
balance was approximately $440,000.
In February 2021, the Company determined that
certain properties acquired with the February 2019 KII acquisition
were redundant after KII moved its primary operations to Orlando,
FL thereby no longer needing multiple locations.
The Company determined that its
original plan for use of the 45-acres discussed above is no longer
viable as KII shifted its focus back to its primary core business
of extraction of cannabinoids and the production of products for
sale with the cannabinoids. Currently KII has listed for sale its
Clermont, FL property which was used as a testing laboratory
facility. On May 26, 2021, the Groveland property was sold for
$800,000. KII’s remaining
production property in Mascotte, FL is expected to be listed for
sale by the end of 2021.
Lending Agreements
In July 2018, the Company entered into lending
agreements with three separate entities and received loans in the
total amount of $1,907,000, net of loan fees to be paid back over
an eight-month period on a monthly basis. Payments were made
monthly and comprised of principal and accrued interest with an
effective interest rate between 15% and 20%. The
Company’s outstanding balance related to the lending
agreements was approximately $504,000 at December 31, 2018, and is
included in other current liabilities on the Company’s
balance sheet. The loans were paid in full in the first quarter of
2019.
M2C Purchase Agreement
In March 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase
certain assets of M2C Global, Inc., a Nevada corporation, for
$4,500,000. The agreement required payments totaling
$500,000 in three installments during 2007, followed by monthly
payments in the amount of 10.00% of the sales related to the
acquired assets until the entire note balance is paid. At
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying value of the liability was
approximately $1,027,000 and $1,071,000, respectively.
Other Notes
The Company’s other notes relate to loans for commercial vans
at CLR in the amount of $71,000 and $96,000 at December 31, 2019
and 2018, respectively, which expire at various dates through
2023.
Line of Credit
In November 2017, CLR entered into a loan and security agreement
with Crestmark Bank (“Crestmark”) providing for a line
of credit related to accounts receivables resulting from sales of
certain products that includes borrowings to be advanced against
acceptable eligible inventory related to CLR. In December 2017, the
loan and security agreement were amended to increase the maximum
overall borrowing to $6,250,000. The line of credit may not exceed
an amount which is the lesser of (a) $6,250,000 or (b) the sum of
up (i) to 85% of the value of the eligible accounts; plus, (ii) the
lesser of $1,000,000 or 50% of eligible inventory or 50% of the
amount calculated in (i) above, plus (iii) the lesser of $250,000
or eligible inventory or 75% of certain specific inventory
identified within the agreement.
The agreement contains certain financial and nonfinancial covenants
with which the Company must comply to maintain its borrowing
availability and avoid penalties. At December 31, 2019, the Company
was in compliance with the covenants. As of the filing date of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company is not in compliance with
the covenants under the terms of the agreement, specifically
related to the delay in the Company’s filings of its
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 and for
the quarters ended March 31, 2020, June 30, 2020, September 30,
2020, December 31, 2020, and March 31, 2021, however the Company
has received a waiver of such covenants. Delays could result in the
Company being in default for not providing the required quarterly
financial information in a timely manner and Crestmark calling the
loan balance due immediately.
The outstanding principal balance of the line of credit bears
interest based upon a 360-day year with interest charged for each
day the principal amount is outstanding including the date of
actual payment. The interest rate is a rate equal to the prime rate
plus 2.50% with a floor of 6.75%. At December 31, 2019 and 2018,
the interest rate was 7.25% and 8.00%, respectively. In addition,
other fees are incurred for the maintenance of the loan in
accordance with the agreement. Other fees may be incurred in the
event the minimum loan balance of $2,000,000 is not maintained. The
agreement was effective until November 16, 2020 and will continue
to be effective for additional one-year terms unless written notice
of termination is provided to Crestmark not less than thirty days
to the end of any renewal term.
The Company and Stephan Wallach entered into a corporate guaranty
and personal guaranty, respectively, with Crestmark guaranteeing
payments in the event that the Company’s commercial coffee
segment CLR were to default. In addition, David Briskie, the
Company’s president and chief financial officer, personally
entered into a guaranty of validity representing the
Company’s financial statements so long as the indebtedness is
owed to Crestmark, maintaining certain covenants and
guarantees.
The Company’s outstanding line of credit liability related to
the Crestmark Loan was approximately $2,011,000 and $2,256,000 at
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Note 7. Convertible Notes Payable
The Company’s total convertible notes payable at December 31,
2019 and 2018, net of debt discount outstanding consisted of the
amount set forth in the following table (in
thousands):
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
6.00%
Convertible Notes (2019 PIPE Notes), principal
|
$3,090
|
$–
|
Debt
discounts
|
(415)
|
–
|
Carrying
value of 2019 PIPE Notes
|
2,675
|
–
|
|
|
|
8.00%
Convertible Notes (2014 PIPE Notes), principal
|
25
|
750
|
Debt
discounts
|
–
|
(103)
|
Carrying
value of 2014 PIPE Notes
|
25
|
647
|
Total
carrying value of convertible notes payable
|
$2,700
|
$647
|
Unamortized debt discounts and issuance costs are included with
convertible notes payable, net of debt discount on the consolidated
balance sheets.
2014 PIPE Notes
Between July and September 2014, the Company entered into note
purchase agreements (the “2014 PIPE Note” or
“2014 PIPE Notes”) related to its private placement
offering (the “2014 private placement”) with seven
accredited investors pursuant to which the Company raised aggregate
gross proceeds of $4,750,000 and sold units consisting of five year
senior secured convertible 2014 PIPE Notes in the aggregate
principal amount of $4,750,000 that were convertible into 678,568
shares of our common stock, at a conversion price of $7.00 per
share, and warrants to purchase 929,346 shares of common stock at
an exercise price of $4.60 per share. The 2014 PIPE Notes bear
interest at a rate of 8.00% per annum and interest is paid
quarterly in arrears.
In September 2019, the Company extended the maturity date of one
holder of a 2014 PIPE Note for one year, with interest being paid
under the original terms of 8.00% per annum and interest paid
quarterly in arrears. All other 2014 PIPE Notes have been settled.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the remaining principal balance of
the 2014 PIPE Notes was $25,000 and $750,000, respectively. The
remaining 2014 PIPE Note of $25,000 was paid in September
2020.
In October 2018, the Company entered into an a stockholder approved
agreement with Mr. Grover to exchange all amounts owed under the
2014 PIPE Note held by him in the principal amount of $4,000,000
for (i) 747,664 shares of the Company’s common stock at a
conversion price of $5.35 per share and (ii) a four-year warrant to
purchase 631,579 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$4.75 per share. Upon the closing, the Company issued Ascendant Alternative
Strategies, LLC (or its designees), which acted as the
Company’s advisor in connection with a debt exchange
transaction, 30,000 shares of common stock in accordance with an
advisory agreement and four-year warrants to purchase 80,000 shares
of common stock at an exercise price of $5.35 per share and
four-year warrants to purchase 70,000 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $4.75 per share.
The Company considered the guidance of ASC 470-20, Debt:
Debt with
Conversion and Other Options and ASC 470-60, Debt: Debt Troubled Debt
Restructuring by Debtors and
concluded that the 2014 PIPE Note held by Mr. Grover should be
recognized as a debt modification for an induced conversion of
convertible debt under the guidance of ASC 470-20. The Company
recognized all remaining unamortized discounts of approximately
$679,000 immediately subsequent to the transaction date as interest
expense. The fair value of the warrants and additional shares
issued were recorded as a loss on induced debt conversion on the
consolidated statement of operations in the amount of $4,706,000
during the year ended December 31, 2018, with the corresponding
entry recorded to equity.
In 2014, the Company initially recorded debt discounts of
$4,750,000 related to the beneficial conversion feature and related
detachable warrants. The beneficial conversion feature discount and
the detachable warrants discount are amortized to interest expense
over the life of the 2014 PIPE Notes. The unamortized debt
discounts recognized with the debt exchange was approximately
$679,000. The Company recorded approximately $94,000 and $795,000,
respectively, of amortization of the debt discounts during the
years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. At December 31, 2018, the
remaining balance of the debt discounts was approximately $94,000.
At December 31, 2019, the debt discounts relating to the 2014 PIPE
Notes were fully amortized.
In 2014, the Company paid approximately $490,000 in expenses
including placement agent fees relating to issuance costs with
the 2014 private placement. The unamortized issuance costs
recognized with the debt exchange was approximately $63,000. The
issuance costs were amortized to interest expense over the term of
the 2014 PIPE Notes. The Company recorded approximately $10,000 and
$82,000 of amortization of the issuance costs during the years
ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. At December 31,
2018, the remaining balance of the issuance costs was approximately
$10,000. At December 31, 2019, all issuance costs relating to the
2014 private placement and debt exchange were fully
amortized.
2015 PIPE Notes
Between October and November 2015, the Company entered into note
purchase agreements (the “2015 PIPE Note” or
“2015 PIPE Notes”) related to its private placement
offering (the “2015 private placement”) with three
accredited investors pursuant to which the Company raised cash
proceeds of $3,188,000 in the offering and converted $4,000,000 of
debt from the Company’s private placement in January 2015 to
this offering in consideration of the sale of aggregate units
consisting of three-year senior secured convertible 2015 PIPE Notes
in the aggregate principal amount of $7,188,000, convertible into
1,026,784 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $7.00 per
share, subject to adjustment as provided therein; and five-year
warrants exercisable to purchase 479,166 shares of the
Company’s common stock at a price of $9.00 per share. The
2015 PIPE Notes paid interest at a rate of 8.00% per annum and
interest was paid quarterly in arrears with all principal and
unpaid interest due at maturity on October 12, 2018.
In October 2018, Mr. Grover exercised his right to convert all
amounts owed under the 2015 PIPE Note in the principal amount of
$3,000,000 into 428,571 shares of common stock at a conversion rate
of $7.00 per share. At December 31, 2018, the 2015 PIPE Notes were
fully converted, and no principal remained
outstanding.
During 2017, in connection with the 2017 private placement three
investors from the 2015 private placement converted their 2015 PIPE
Notes in the aggregate amount of $4,200,000 including principal and
accrued interest thereon into new convertible notes for an equal
principal amount in the 2017 private placement as discussed below.
The Company accounted for the conversion of the notes as an
extinguishment in accordance with ASC 470-20 and ASC
470-50.
The Company recorded issuance debt discounts associated with the
2015 PIPE Notes of $309,000 related to the beneficial conversion
feature and the detachable warrants. The beneficial conversion
feature discount and the detachable warrants discount were
amortized to interest expense over the term of the 2015 PIPE Notes.
The Company recorded approximately $36,000 of the debt discounts
amortization during the year ended December 31, 2018 and was
recorded as interest expense. At December 31, 2018, the debt
discounts related to the 2015 PIPE Notes were fully
amortized.
The Company paid $786,000 in expenses including placement
agent fees relating to issuance costs with the 2015 private
placement. The issuance costs were amortized to interest expense
over the term of the 2015 PIPE Notes. The Company recorded
approximately $92,000 of the amortization of issuance costs during
the year ended December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2018, all
issuance costs relating to the 2015 PIPE Notes were fully
amortized.
In addition, the Company issued warrants to the placement agent in
connection with the 2015 PIPE Notes which were valued at
approximately $384,000. These warrants were not protected against
down-round financing and accordingly, were classified as equity
instruments and the corresponding deferred issuance costs were
amortized to interest expense over the term of the 2015 PIPE Notes.
At December 31, 2018, the Company recorded approximately $45,000 of
amortization relating to the issuance costs from the warrants. At
December 31, 2018, the issuance costs related to the warrants were
fully amortized.
2017 PIPE Notes
Between July and August 2017, the Company entered into note
purchase agreements (the
“2017 PIPE Note” or “2017 PIPE Notes”)
related to its private placement offering (“2017 private
placement”) with accredited investors pursuant to
which the Company raised aggregate gross cash proceeds of
approximately $3,054,000 in the offering and converted $4,200,000
of debt from the 2015 PIPE Notes for an aggregate principal amount of approximately
$7,254,000. The Company's used the proceeds from the 2017
private placement for working capital purposes.
In March 2018, the Company completed the Series B offering pursuant
to which the Company sold 381,173 shares of Series B convertible
preferred stock and received aggregate gross proceeds of
$3,621,000, which triggered the automatic conversion of the 2017
PIPE Notes to common stock. The 2017 PIPE Notes consisted of
three-year senior secured convertible notes in the aggregate
principal amount of approximately $7,254,000, which converted into
1,577,033 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $4.60 per
share, and three-year warrants exercisable to purchase 970,581
shares of the Company’s common stock at a price per share of
$5.56 (the “2017 Warrants”). The 2017 Warrants were not
impacted by the automatic conversion of the 2017 PIPE
Notes.
As a result of the Company completing a preferred stock transaction
with aggregate gross proceeds of more than $3,000,000 for the
purpose of raising capital, the 2017 PIPE Notes automatically
converted to common stock prior to the maturity date.
The
Company accounted for the automatic conversion of the 2017 PIPE Notes as an extinguishment in
accordance with ASC 470-20 and ASC 470-50, and as such the related
debt discounts, issuance costs and bifurcated embedded conversion
feature were adjusted as part of accounting for the conversion.
The Company recorded a non-cash
extinguishment loss on debt of $1,082,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2018 as a result of the conversion of the 2017 PIPE
Notes. This loss represents the difference between the carrying
value of the 2017 PIPE Notes and embedded conversion feature and
the fair value of the shares that were issued. The fair value of
the shares issued was based on the stock price on the date of the
conversion.
At December 31, 2018, the 2017 PIPE Notes were fully converted, and
no principal remained outstanding. The 2017 PIPE Notes would have matured in July
2020 and bore interest at a rate of 8.00% per annum. For twelve
months following the closing, the investors in the 2017 private
placement had the right to participate in any future equity
financings, subject to certain conditions.
The
Company recorded debt discounts associated with the 2017 PIPE Notes of $330,000 related to the
bifurcated embedded conversion feature. The embedded conversion
feature was amortized to interest expense over the term of the
2017 PIPE Notes. During the
year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded approximately
$28,000 of amortization related to the debt discount
cost.
The Company paid $1,922,000 in expenses including placement
agent fees relating to the issuance costs with the 2017
private placement. The issuance costs were being amortized to
interest expense over the term of the 2017 PIPE Notes.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded
approximately $136,000 of amortization related to the warrant
issuance cost.
The
Company issued the placement agent a three-year warrant to purchase
179,131 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise
price of $5.56 per share and 22,680 shares of the Company’s
common stock. The issuance costs were
amortized to interest expense over the term of the 2017 PIPE
Notes. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded approximately $53,000 of
amortization related to the issuance costs.
2019 PIPE Notes
Between
February and July 2019, the Company closed five tranches related to
the 2019 private placement debt offering, pursuant to which the
Company offered for sale up to $10,000,000 in principal amount of
notes (the “2019 PIPE Notes”), with each investor
receiving 2,000 shares of common stock for each $100,000 invested.
The Company entered into subscription agreements with thirty-one
accredited investors, that had a substantial pre-existing
relationship with the Company, pursuant to which the Company
received aggregate gross proceeds of $3,090,000 and issued 2019
PIPE Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $3,090,000 and an
aggregate of 61,800 shares of common stock. The placement agent
received 15,450 shares of common stock for the closed tranches.
Each 2019 PIPE Note matures 24 months after issuance, bears
interest at a rate of 6.00% per annum which is paid quarterly, and
the outstanding principal is convertible into shares of common
stock at any time after the 180th day anniversary of the issuance
of the 2019 PIPE Notes, at a conversion price of $10.00 per share,
subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends and
reclassification of the common stock. The 2019 PIPE Notes are secured by all equity in
KII. (See Note 14)
Upon issuance of the 2019 PIPE Notes, the Company recognized debt
discounts of approximately $671,000, resulting from the allocated
portion of offering proceeds to the separable common stock
issuance. The debt discount will be amortized to interest expense
over the term of the 2019 PIPE Notes. During the year
ended December 30, 2019, the Company recorded approximately
$256,000 of amortization related to the debt
discounts.
Debt Maturities
The following summarizes the maturities of notes payable and line
of credit (See Note 6) and convertible notes payable (in
thousands):
Years
ending December 31,
|
|
2020
|
$7,227
|
2021
|
1,454
|
2022
|
4,365
|
2023
|
325
|
2024
|
532
|
Thereafter
|
3,431
|
Total
|
$17,334
|
In February 2021, the two March 2019 promissory notes totaling
$2,000,000 which bear interest at a rate of 8.00% per annum and
matured in March 2021, were extended by way of an amendment to the
notes (the “8% Note Amendment”) to extend the maturity
date to March 2022 which is reflected in the table above. In
addition, the Company agreed to increase the interest rate to 16%
per annum. As of the date of this filing, the Company is in default
of the terms of settlement set forth in the 8% Note
Amendment.
Between February and March 2021, the 2019 6% Notes totaling
$1,190,000 that were maturing in February and March 2021 were
extended by way of an amendment to the convertible notes (the
“6% Note Amendments”), whereby the Company agreed to
make certain principal payments as agreed upon within the
amendment, extending the maturity dates between February 2022 and
March 2022 which is reflected in the table above. In addition, the
Company agreed to increase the interest rate between 12% and 16%
per annum. As of the date of this filing, the Company is in default
of the terms of settlement set forth in the 6% Note
Amendments.
Note 8. Derivative Financial Instruments
Warrants
Between August and October of 2018, the Company issued 630,526
three-year warrants to investors in the 2018 private placement. The
exercise price of the warrants is protected against down-round
financing throughout the term of the warrant. Pursuant to ASC Topic
815, the fair value of the warrants of approximately $1,689,000 was
recorded as a derivative liability on the issuance
dates. The estimated fair values of the warrants were
computed at issuance using a Monte Carlo pricing model. The
Company adopted ASU No. 2017-11 effective January 1, 2019 and
determined that it’s 2018 warrants were to no longer be
classified as a derivative, as a result of the adoption and
subsequent change in classification of the 2018 warrants, the
Company reclassed approximately $1,494,000 of warrant derivative
liability to equity.
In January 2018, the Company approved an amendment to its warrant
agreements issued to the placement agent, pursuant to which
warrants were issued to purchase 179,131 shares of the
Company’s common stock as compensation associated with the
Company’s 2017 private placement. The warrant amendment
amended the transfer provisions of the warrants and removed the
down-round price protection provision. As a result of this change
in terms, the Company considered the guidance of ASC 815-40-35-8 in
regard to the appropriate treatment related to the modification of
these warrants that were initially classified as derivative
liabilities. In accordance with the guidance, the warrants should
now be classified as equity instruments.
The Company determined that the liability associated with the 2018
warrants should be remeasured and adjusted to fair value on the
date of the modification with the offset to be recorded through
earnings and then the fair value of the warrants should be
reclassified to equity. The Company recorded the change in the
fair value of the July 2017 warrants as of the date of modification
to earnings. The fair value of the modified warrants at the date of
modification, in the amount of $284,000 was reclassified from
warrant derivative liability to additional paid in capital as a
result of the change in classification of the
warrants.
The estimated fair value of the outstanding warrant derivative
liabilities was $1,542,000 and $9,216,000 at December 31, 2019 and
2018, respectively.
Increases or decreases in the fair value of the derivative
liability are included as a component of total other expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the
respective period. The changes to the derivative liability for
warrants resulted in a decrease of $5,502,000 and an increase of
$4,645,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
The estimated fair value of the warrants was computed at December
31, 2019 and 2018 using the Monte Carlo option pricing models,
using the following assumptions:
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Stock
price volatility
|
64.10
|
83.78% –
136.76%
|
Risk-free
interest rates
|
1.59% –
1.60%
|
2.47% –
2.58%
|
Annual
dividend yield
|
0
|
0
|
Expected
life (in years)
|
0.58 – 0.96
|
0.58 – 2.76
|
In addition, management assessed the probabilities of future
financing assumptions in the valuation models.
Embedded Conversion Derivatives
In
March 2018, the Company completed the Series B offering and raised
in excess of $3,000,000 of aggregate gross proceeds which triggered
an automatic conversion of the 2017
PIPE Notes to common stock. As a result, the related
embedded conversion option was extinguished with the 2017 PIPE Notes. The Company did not
revalue the embedded conversion liability associated with the
2017 PIPE Notes as the change
in the fair value was insignificant.
Note 9. Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
The following table details the fair value measurement within the
fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial instruments,
which includes the Level 3 liabilities (in thousands):
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2019
|
|||
|
Total
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent
acquisition debt, current portion
|
$1,263
|
$–
|
$–
|
$1,263
|
Contingent
acquisition debt, less current portion
|
7,348
|
–
|
–
|
7,348
|
Warrant
derivative liability
|
1,542
|
–
|
–
|
1,542
|
Total
derivative liabilities
|
$10,153
|
$–
|
$–
|
$10,153
|
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2018
|
|||
|
Total
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent
acquisition debt, current portion
|
$795
|
$–
|
$–
|
$795
|
Contingent
acquisition debt, less current portion
|
7,466
|
–
|
–
|
7,466
|
Warrant
derivative liability
|
9,216
|
–
|
–
|
9,216
|
Total
derivative liabilities
|
$17,477
|
$–
|
$–
|
$17,477
|
The following table reflects the activity for the Company’s
warrant derivative liability associated with the Company’s
private placements measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs (in
thousands):
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
$3,365
|
Issuance
|
1,689
|
Adjustments
to estimated fair value
|
4,645
|
Adjustment
related to warrant exercises
|
(199)
|
Adjustment
related to the modification of warrants (Note 10)
|
(284)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2018
|
9,216
|
Issuance
|
399
|
Adjustments
to estimated fair value
|
(5,502)
|
Adjustment
related to warrant exercises
|
(1,077)
|
Adjustments
related to the reclassification of warrants to equity
|
(1,494)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2019
|
$1,542
|
The following table reflects the activity for the Company’s
embedded conversion feature derivative liability associated with
the 2017 PIPE Notes measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs (in
thousands):
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
$200
|
Adjustment
related to the conversion of the 2017 PIPE Notes
|
(200)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2019 and 2018
|
$–
|
The following table reflects the activity for the Company’s
contingent acquisition debt measured at fair value using Level 3
inputs (in thousands):
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
$14,404
|
Liabilities
acquired
|
2,460
|
Liabilities
settled
|
(165)
|
Adjustments
to liabilities included in earnings
|
(6,600)
|
Adjustment
to purchase price
|
(1,838)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2018
|
8,261
|
Liabilities
acquired
|
2,648
|
Liabilities
settled
|
(460)
|
Adjustments
to liabilities included in earnings
|
(1,838)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2019
|
$8,611
|
The weighted-average discount rate used to determine the fair value
of contingent acquisition debt was 18.42% at both December 31, 2019
and 2018.
During
the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the net adjustment to
the fair value of the contingent acquisition debt was a decrease of
approximately $1,838,000 and $6,600,000, respectively, and was
included in the Company’s statement of operations in general
and administrative expenses.
In 2018, the Company recorded a decrease to the contingent
acquisition debt of $1,246,000 as a result of the removal of the
debt associated with its 2016 acquisition of Nature's Pearl whereby
the Company was no longer obligated under the related asset
purchase agreement to make payments.
Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity
The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended,
authorizes the issuance of two classes of stock to be designated
“common stock” and “preferred
stock”.
At December 31, 2019, the total number of shares of stock which the
Company has authority to issue was 50,000,000 shares of common
stock, par value $0.001 per share and 5,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which (i) 161,135 shares was
designated as Series A preferred stock (ii) 1,052,631 was
designated as Series B preferred stock, (iii) 700,000 was
designated as Series C preferred stock, and (iv) 650,000 was
designated as Series D preferred stock.
The Company’s common stock is traded on the OTC Pink Market
operated by OTC Markets under the symbol “YGYI”. From
June 2017 until November 2020, the Company’s common stock was
traded on Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol
“YGYI.” From June 2013 until June 2017, the
Company’s common stock was traded on the OTCQX Marketplace
operated by OTC Markets under the symbol “YGYI”.
Previously, the common stock was quoted on the OTC Markets OTC Pink
market system under the symbol “JCOF”.
The Company’s 9.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value is traded on OTC Pink market
operated by OTC Markets Group under the symbol
“YGYIP”.
Shelf Registration
In May 2018, the SEC declared the Company’s shelf
registration statement on Form S-3 effective to register shares of
the Company’s common stock for sale of up to $75,000,000
giving the Company the opportunity to raise funding when considered
appropriate at prices and on terms to be determined at the time of
any such offerings. The Company’s ability to sell securities
registered on its registration statement on Form S-3 (the
“Shelf”) was limited until such time the market value
of its voting securities held by non-affiliates is $75 million or
more. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company raised
net proceeds under the Shelf in the aggregate of approximately
$12,371,000 from the issuance of the Company’s preferred
stock series D offering and the ATM noted below. During the year
ended December 31, 2018, the Company did not use the Shelf. The
Company is no longer eligible to use the Shelf.
Common Stock
At December 31, 2019 and 2018 there were 30,274,601 and 25,760,708
shares of common stock outstanding, respectively. The
holders of the common stock are entitled to one vote for each share
held at all meetings of stockholders (and written actions in lieu
of meetings).
Stock Offerings
2019 Share Purchase Agreements
In June 2019, the Company entered into a securities purchase
agreement with one accredited investor that had a substantial
pre-existing relationship with the Company pursuant to which the
Company sold 250,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of
$5.50 per share. The Company received gross proceeds of
$1,375,000.
In February 2019, the Company entered into a purchase agreement
with one accredited investor that had a substantial pre-existing
relationship with the Company pursuant to which the Company sold
250,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of $7.00 per
share. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the Company also issued
to the investor a three-year warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $7.00. The Company received
gross proceeds of $1,750,000. Consulting fees to the placement
agent for arranging the purchase agreement included the issuance of
5,000 shares of restricted shares of the Company’s common
stock with a fair value of $7.00 per share, and three-year warrants
to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock expiring in February
2022 priced at $10.00. The Company used the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the warrants
issued to the selling agent to be $324,000 at the time of issuance
as direct issuance costs and recorded in equity. No cash
commissions were paid.
2019 Promissory Notes
In March 2019, the Company entered into a two-year secured
promissory note with two accredited investors that the Company had
a substantial pre-existing relationship with and from whom the
Company raised cash proceeds in the aggregate of $2,000,000. The
promissory notes are secured by all equity in KII. In consideration
of the promissory notes, the Company issued 20,000 shares of common
stock and five-year warrants to purchase 20,000 shares of common
stock at a price per share of $6.00 for each $1,000,000 invested.
The promissory notes pay interest at a rate of 8.00% per annum and
interest is paid quarterly in arrears with all principal and unpaid
interest due at maturity on March 18, 2021. The Company issued in
the aggregate 40,000 shares of common stock and 40,000 warrants
with the Notes. The Company used the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model to estimate the aggregate fair value of the
warrants issued to be $138,000 at the time of issuance as direct
issuance costs and recorded as a debt discount and is being
amortized as expense over the life of the promissory notes. The
aggregate fair value of the shares issued was based on the closing
price of the Company’s common stock on the closing date was
approximately $212,000 was recorded as a debt discount and is being
amortized as expense over the life of the promissory
notes.
2019 Private Placement - Convertible Notes
Between February and July 2019, the Company closed five tranches
related to the 2019 January private placement debt offering,
pursuant to which the Company offered the 2019 PIPE Notes, with
each investor receiving in addition to a 2019 PIPE Notes, 2,000
shares of common stock for each $100,000 invested. The Company
issued an aggregate of 61,800 shares of common stock as a result of
the 2019 private placement. The placement agent received 15,450
shares of common stock for the closed tranches. The 2019 PIPE Notes
are secured by all equity in KII. The aggregate fair value of the
shares issued was based on the closing price of the Company’s
common stock on the closing date was approximately $451,000 was
recorded as a debt discount and is being amortized as expense over
the life of the promissory notes. (See Note 14)
2018 Private Placement
Between
August 2018 and October 2018, the Company completed its 2018
private placement and entered into securities purchase agreements
with nine investors with whom the Company had a substantial
pre-existing relationship pursuant to which the Company sold an
aggregate of 630,526 shares of common stock at an offering price of
$4.75 per share. In addition, the Company issued the investors an
aggregate of 150,000 additional shares of common stock as an
advisory fee and issued the investors three-year warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 630,526 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $4.75 per share. The
fair value of the warrants as issuance was approximately
$1,689,000.
The Company adopted ASU No. 2017-11 effective January 1, 2019 and
determined that the 2018 warrants were to no longer be classified
as a derivative, as a result of the adoption and subsequent change
in classification of the 2018 warrants, the Company reclassed
approximately $1,494,000 of warrant derivative liability to equity.
(See Note 8) At December 31,
2019 and 2018, 448,420 and 630,526 warrants, respectively, were
outstanding.
The
purchase agreement requires the Company to issue the investor
additional shares of the Company’s common stock in the event
that the average of the 15 lowest closing prices for the
Company’s common stock during the period beginning on August
31, 2018 and ending on the date 90 days from the effective date of
the registration statement (the “subsequent pricing
period”) is less than $4.75 per share. The additional common
shares to be issued are calculated as the difference between the
common stock that would have been issued using the average price of
such lowest 15 closing prices during the subsequent pricing period
less shares of common stock already issued pursuant to the 2018
private placement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event may
the aggregate number of shares issued by the Company, including
shares of common stock issued, shares of common stock underlying
the warrants, the shares of common stock issued as advisory shares
and true-up shares exceed 2.9% of the Company’s issued and
outstanding common stock at August 31, 2018 for each $1,000,000
invested in the Company.
The
true-up share feature was considered to be embedded in the specific
common shares purchased by each investor, by way of the purchase
agreement. As the economic characteristics and risks of the true-up
share feature are clearly and closely related to the common stock
host contract, the true-up share feature was not separately
recognized in the private placement transaction.
The
aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $2,995,000 from the aggregate
closings of the 2018 private placement were first allocated to the
investor warrants, with an aggregate initial fair value of
approximately $1,689,000, with the residual amount allocated to the
common stock issued in the offering, including the common stock
issued to each investor as an advisory fee. The net cash proceeds to the Company from the
2018 private placement were
approximately $2,962,000 after deducting advisory fees, closing and
issuance costs.
2015 Convertible Note
In
October 2018, Mr. Grover, an investor in the Company’s 2014
and 2015 private placements, exercised his right to convert all
amounts owed under the note issued to him in the 2015 private
placement in the principal amount of $3,000,000 which matured in
October 2018, into 428,571 shares of common stock (at a conversion
rate of $7.00 per share), in accordance with its stated terms. (See
Note 7)
2014 Convertible Note – Debt Exchange
In October 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr.
Grover to exchange all amounts owed under the 2014 Note held by him
in the principal amount of $4,000,000 which matured in July 2019,
for 747,664 shares of the Company’s common stock, at a
conversion price of $5.35 per share and a four-year warrant to
purchase 631,579 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$4.75 per share. The warrant to purchase 747,664 shares of common
stock remained outstanding at both December 31, 2019 and 2018. The
agreement was subject to shareholder approval which was received on
December 5, 2018.
A FINRA
broker dealer acted as the Company’s advisor in connection
with the debt exchange. Upon the closing of the debt exchange, the
Company subsequently received shareholder approval to issue the
broker dealer 30,000 shares of common stock, a four-year warrant to
purchase 80,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$5.35 per share and a four-year warrant to purchase 70,000 shares
of common stock at an exercise price of $4.75 per share.
The warrants to purchase an aggregate
150,000 shares remained outstanding at both December 31, 2019 and
2018.
2018 Note Payable
In
December 2018, CLR entered into a credit agreement with Mr. Grover
pursuant to which CLR borrowed $5,000,000 from Mr. Grover and in
exchange issued to him a $5,000,000 credit note. In addition, CLR’s subsidiary Siles, as
guarantor, executed a separate Guaranty Agreement
(“Guaranty”). In connection with the credit
agreement, the Company issued to Mr. Grover a four-year warrant to
purchase 250,000 shares of its common stock, exercisable at $6.82
per share and a four-year warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of its
common stock, exercisable at $7.82 per share, pursuant to a warrant
purchase agreement with Mr. Grover. The Company also entered into
an advisory agreement with Ascendant, a third party not affiliated
with Mr. Grover, in connection with the credit agreement, pursuant
to which the Company agreed to pay to Ascendant a 3.00% fee on the
transaction with Mr. Grover and issued to Ascendant a four-year
warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of its common stock, exercisable
at $6.33 per share.
2019 At-the-Market Equity Offering Program
In January 2019, the Company entered into the “ATM
agreement with the Benchmark Company LLC (“Benchmark”)
pursuant to which the Company may sell from time to time, at the
Company’s option, shares of its common stock through
Benchmark as sales agent, for the sale of up to $60,000,000 of
shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company is not
obligated to make any sales of common stock under the ATM agreement
and the Company cannot provide any assurances that it will continue
to issue any shares pursuant to the ATM agreement. During the year
ended December 31, 2019, the Company sold 17,524 shares of common
stock under the ATM agreement and received net proceeds of
approximately $102,000. The Company paid the Benchmark 3.0%
commission of the gross sales proceeds. The Company is not
currently eligible to register the offer and sale of the
Company’s securities using a registration statement on Form
S-3 and therefore cannot make sales under the ATM agreement until
such time that the Company once again becomes S-3
eligible.
Preferred Stock
Series A Preferred Stock
The Company has 161,135 shares of Series A preferred stock
outstanding at December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018 and accrued
dividends of approximately $150,000 and $137,000, respectively. The
holders of the Series A preferred stock are entitled to receive a
cumulative dividend at a rate of 8.00% per year, payable annually
either in cash or shares of the Company's common stock at the
Company's election. Each share of Series A preferred
stock is convertible into common stock at a conversion rate of
one-tenth of a share. The holders of Series A preferred stock are
entitled to receive payments upon liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of the Company before any amount is paid to the holders
of common stock. The holders of Series A preferred stock have no
voting rights, except as required by law.
Series B Preferred Stock
In March 2018, the Company completed the Series B offering,
pursuant to which the Company sold 381,173 shares of Series B
preferred stock at an offering price of $9.50 per share. Each share
of Series B preferred stock is initially convertible at any time,
in whole or in part, at the option of the holders, at a conversion
price of $4.75 per share, into 2 shares of common stock and
automatically converts into 2 shares of common stock on its
two-year anniversary of issuance.
In connection with the Series B offering, the Company issued the
placement agent 38,117 warrants as compensation, exercisable at
$5.70 per share and expire in February 2023. The Company determined
that the warrants should be classified as equity instruments and
used Black-Scholes to estimate the fair value of the warrants
issued to the placement agent of $75,000 at the issuance date March
30, 2018. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, 6,098 warrants issued to
the placement agent remain outstanding.
The Company received gross proceeds in aggregate of $3,621,000. The
net proceeds to the Company from the Series B offering were
$3,289,000 after deducting commissions, closing and issuance
costs.
The Company has 129,332 and 129,437 shares of Series B preferred
stock outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company received
notice of conversion for 105 shares of Series B preferred stock
which converted to 210 shares of common stock. During the year
ended December 31, 2018, the Company received notice of conversion
for 251,736 shares of Series B preferred stock which converted to
503,472 shares of common stock.
The shares of Series B preferred stock issued in the Series B
offering were sold pursuant to the Company’s registration
statement, which was declared effective on February 13, 2018. Upon
the receipt of the proceeds of the Series B offering, the 2017 PIPE
Notes in the principal amount of approximately $7,254,000
automatically converted into 1,577,033 shares of common
stock.
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, each
holder of Series B preferred stock shall be entitled to receive a
distribution, to be paid in an amount equal to $9.50 for each and
every share of Series B preferred stock held by the holders of
Series B preferred stock, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends in
preference to any distribution or payments made or any asset
distributed to the holders of common stock, the Series A preferred
stock, or any other class or series of stock ranking junior to the
Series B preferred stock.
Pursuant to the certificate of designation, the Company has agreed
to pay cumulative dividends on the Series B preferred stock from
the date of original issue at a rate of 5.0% per annum payable
quarterly in arrears on or about the last day of March, June,
September and December of each year, beginning June 30,
2018.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, accrued dividends were approximately
$15,000 and $11,000, respectively. During the years ended December
31, 2019 and 2018, a total of approximately $51,000 and $77,000,
respectively, of dividends was paid to the holders of the Series B
preferred stock. The Series B preferred stock ranks senior to the
Company’s outstanding Series A preferred stock and the common
stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation,
dissolution or winding up. Holders of the Series B preferred stock
have no voting rights.
Series C Preferred Stock
Between August and October 2018, the Company closed three tranches
of its Series C offering, pursuant to which the Company sold
697,363 shares of Series C preferred stock at an offering price of
$9.50 per share and agreed to issue two-year warrants to
purchase up to 1,394,726 shares of the Company’s common stock
at an exercise price of $4.75 per share to Series C preferred
holders that voluntary convert their shares of Series C preferred
stock to the Company’s common stock within two-years from the
issuance date. Each share of Series C preferred stock was
initially convertible at any time, in whole or in part, at the
option of the holders, at an initial conversion price of $4.75 per
share, into 2 shares of common stock and automatically converts
into 2 shares of common stock on its two-year anniversary of
issuance.
The Series C preferred stock was automatically redeemable at a
price equal to its original purchase price plus all accrued but
unpaid dividends in the event the average of the daily volume
weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the
30 days preceding the two-year anniversary date of issuance is less
than $6.00 per share. As redemption was outside of the
Company’s control, the Series C preferred stock was
classified in temporary equity at issuance. At December 31, 2018,
all of the shares of Series C preferred stock were converted to
common stock and the Company issued 1,394,726 warrants. At December
31, 2018, no shares of Series C preferred stock remained
outstanding.
In connection with the Series C offering, the Company issued the
placement agent 116,867 warrants as compensation, exercisable at
$4.75 per share and expire in December 2020. The Company determined
that the warrants should be classified as equity instruments and
used Black-Scholes to estimate the fair value of the warrants
issued to the placement agent of $458,000 at the issuance date in
December 2018. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, 17,724 and 116,867,
respectively, of warrants issued to the placement agent remained
outstanding.
The Company received aggregate gross proceeds totaling
approximately $6,625,000. The net proceeds to the Company from the
Series C offering were approximately $6,236,000 after deducting
commissions, closing and issuance costs.
The Company paid cumulative dividends on the Series C preferred
stock from the date of original issue at a rate of 6.00% per
annum payable quarterly in arrears on or about the last day of
March, June, September and December of each year, beginning
September 30, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018,
approximately $51,000 of dividends was paid to the holders of the
Series C preferred stock.
The contingent obligation to issue warrants was considered an
outstanding equity-linked financial instrument and therefore was
recognized as equity-classified warrants, initially measured at
relative fair value of approximately $3,727,000, resulting in an
initial discount to the carrying value of the Series C preferred
stock.
Due to the reduction of allocated proceeds to the contingently
issuable common stock warrants and Series C preferred stock, the
effective conversion price of the Series C preferred stock was less
than the Company’s common stock price on each commitment
date, resulting in an aggregate beneficial conversion feature of
approximately $3,276,000, which reduced the carrying value of the
Series C preferred stock. Since the conversion option of the Series
C preferred stock was immediately exercisable, the beneficial
conversion feature was immediately accreted as a deemed dividend,
resulting in an increase in the carrying value of the Series C
preferred stock of approximately $3,276,000.
Series D Preferred Stock
In September and December 2019, the Company closed
two tranches of its Series D offering (the “Series D
Offering”), pursuant to which the Company issued and sold a
total of 578,898 shares of its 9.75% Series D cumulative preferred
stock at a weighted average price to the public of $24.05 per
share, less underwriting discounts and commissions, pursuant to the
terms of the underwriting agreements that the Company entered into
with Benchmark, as representative of the several
underwriters. The 578,898 shares of Series D preferred stock
that were sold included 43,500 shares sold pursuant to the
overallotment option– that the Company granted to the underwriters. At
December 31, 2019, 36,809 overallotment shares were unissued and
available for purchase by the underwriters within 45 days from
December 17, 2019. In January 2020 the Company issued an additional
11,375 shares of Series D preferred stock upon the partial exercise
by the underwriters of the overallotment option granted to such
underwriters. (See Note 14)
The Series D preferred stock was approved for listing on the Nasdaq
Capital Market under the symbol “YGYIP,” and trading
the Series D preferred stock on Nasdaq commenced on September 20,
2019. The net proceeds to the Company from the Series D
Offering were approximately $12,269,000 after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses which were paid
by the Company.
At December 31, 2019, a total of 650,000 shares of the preferred
stock was designated as Series D preferred stock. At December 31,
2019, the Company has available for issuance an additional 71,102
shares of Series D preferred stock. The Series D preferred stock
does not have a stated maturity date and is not subject to any
sinking fund or mandatory redemption provisions. The holders of the
Series D preferred stock are entitled to cumulative dividends from
the first day of the calendar month in which the Series D preferred
stock is issued and payable on the fifteenth day of each calendar
month, when, as and if declared by the Company's board of
directors. The Company’s board of directors has declared an
annual cash dividend of $2.4375 per share, or a monthly dividend of
$0.203125 per share, on the Series D preferred stock.
During the
year ended December 31, 2019, the Company paid $203,000 in cash
dividends to holders of Series D preferred stock.
At December 31, 2019, accrued
dividends payable to holders of record at December 31, 2019 were
approximately $118,000, which were paid in January
2020.
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, each
holder of Series D preferred stock would be entitled to receive a
distribution, to be paid in an amount equal to $25.00 per share
held by the holders of Series D preferred stock, plus all accrued
and unpaid dividends in preference to any distribution or payments
made or any asset distributed to the holders of common stock, the
Series A preferred stock, the Series B preferred stock, the Series
C preferred stock or any other class or series of stock ranking
junior to the Series D preferred stock.
The Series D preferred stock is not redeemable by the Company prior
to September 23, 2022, except upon a change of control (as defined
in the certificate of designations). On and after such date, the
Company may, at its option, redeem the Series D preferred stock, in
whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a
redemption price equal to $25.00 per share, plus any accumulated
and unpaid dividends to, but not including, the redemption date.
Upon the occurrence of a change of control, the Company may, at its
option, redeem the Series D preferred stock, in whole or in part,
within 120 days after the first date on which such change of
control occurred, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per
share, plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends to, but not
including, the redemption date. Holders of the Series D
preferred stock generally have no voting rights. The Company has
578,898 shares of Series D preferred stock outstanding at December
31, 2019.
Advisory Agreements
The
Company records the fair value of common stock issued in
conjunction with advisory service agreements based on the closing
stock price of the Company’s common stock on the measurement
date. The fair value of the stock issued was recorded through
equity and prepaid advisory fees included in prepaid expenses and other current
assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets
and amortized over the life of the service agreement. The stock issuance expense associated with the
amortization of advisory fees was recorded as stock issuance
expense and was included in general and administrative expense on
the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the
years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Capital Market Solutions, LLC
In July
2018, the Company entered into an agreement with Capital Market
Solutions, LLC (“Capital Market”), pursuant to which
Capital Market agreed to provide investor relations services for a
period of 18 months in exchange for 100,000 shares of restricted
common stock which were issued in advance of the service
period. In addition, the Company agreed to pay a cash base fee
of $300,000 of which $50,000 was paid in August 2018 and the
remaining balance was to be paid monthly in the amount of $25,000.
The Company subsequently extended the term of the Capital Market
agreement for an additional 24 months through December 31, 2021.
The Company also issued an additional 100,000 shares of restricted
common stock to Capital Market in advance of the service period and
paid $125,000 for additional fees. The
fair value of the shares issued was approximately
$1,226,000.
In January 2019, the Capital Market agreement was amended pursuant
to which the aggregate base fee increased to $525,000 and the
Company issued an additional 75,000 of restricted common stock,
with a fair value of $417,000. In addition, the Company issued to
Capital Market a four-year warrant to purchase 925,000 shares of
the Company’s common stock at $6.00 per share, vesting 50% at
issuance, 25% vesting in January 2020 and 25% vesting in January
2021.
During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the
Company recorded expense of $100,000 and $425,000,
respectively, in connection with the base fee. During the years
ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded
expense of approximately $514,000 and $102,000, respectively, in
connection with amortization of the stock issuance expense. During
the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded
expense of approximately $2,466,000
in connection with amortization of
equity issuance expense related to fair value of the vested portion
of the warrant.
Corinthian Partners, LLC
In August 2019, the Company issued 600 shares of restricted common
stock to Corinthian Partners, LLC, the initial placement agent for
the issuance of the 2018 warrants which represented 10% of the
shares issued to certain investors. The fair value of the shares
issued of approximately $3,000 was fully expensed in
2019.
Greentree Financial Group, Inc.
In March 2018, the Company entered into an agreement
with Greentree Financial Group,
Inc. (“Greentree”), pursuant to which Greentree
agreed to provide investor relations services for a period of 21
months in exchange for 75,000 shares of restricted common stock
which were issued in advance of the service period. The fair
value of the shares issued was approximately $311,000. During
the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the
Company recorded expense of approximately $178,000 and
$133,000, respectively, in connection with amortization of the
stock issuance.
I-Bankers Securities Incorporated
In April 2019, the Company entered into an agreement
with I-Bankers Securities Incorporated
(“I-Bankers”), pursuant to which I-Bankers agreed to
provide financial advisory services for a period of twelve months
in exchange for 100,000 shares of restricted common stock which
were issued in advance of the service period. The fair value
of the shares issued was approximately $571,000. During the
year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded
expense of approximately $428,000 in connection with amortization
of the stock issuance expense. In addition, the Company agreed to
pay in cash a base fee for debt arrangements and equity offerings
in conjunction with any transactions I-Bankers closes with the
Company in accordance with the agreement. During the year ended
December 31, 2019, the Company did not engage in any financing
activity with I-Bankers.
Ignition Capital, LLC
In April 2018, the Company entered into an agreement
with Ignition Capital, LLC (“Ignition”),
pursuant to which Ignition agreed to provide investor relations
services for a period of 21 months in exchange for 50,000 shares of
restricted common stock which were issued in advance of the service
period. The fair value of the shares issued was approximately
$208,000. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and
2018, the Company recorded expense of approximately
$119,000 and $89,000, respectively, in connection with amortization
of the stock issuance.
In
March 2019, the Ignition agreement was amended to provide
additional compensation of 55,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock for advisory fees and additionally 5,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock were issued in conjunction with one of
the Company’s equity transactions. Under the amended Ignition
agreement, the Company also issued a warrant convertible upon
exercise of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock
exercisable at $10.00 per share for a period of three years for
services provided by Ignition at the amendment date. The fair value
of the shares issued was approximately $384,000 and the fair value
of the warrant issued was approximately $414,000 and was fully
expensed as equity issuance cost and recorded as equity in
2019.
ProActive Capital Resources Group, LLC
The Company entered into an agreement with ProActive
Capital Resources Group, LLC (“PCG”) in
2015 pursuant to which PCG agreed to provide investor relations
services in exchange for fees paid in cash of $6,000 per month and
5,000 shares of restricted common stock to be issued upon
successfully meeting certain criteria in accordance with the
agreement. The Company issued in the aggregate 30,000 shares
of restricted common stock in connection with the PCG agreement
which ended in August 2018.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the
Company issued 15,000 shares of restricted common stock under
this agreement and recorded equity issuance expense in general and
administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated
statement of operations of approximately $31,000 in connection with
amortization of the stock issuance.
The Benchmark Company, LLC
In August 2019, the board of directors approved the issuance of
20,000 shares of restricted common stock to Benchmark for
investment banking services provided to the Company. The fair value
of shares issued was approximately $91,000 and was fully expensed
in 2019.
Warrants
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, warrants to purchase 6,238,182 and
5,876,980 shares, respectively, of the Company's common
stock at prices ranging from $2.00 to $10.00 were outstanding. At
December 31, 2019, 6,006,932 warrants are exercisable and expire at
various dates through March
2024 and have a weighted
average remaining term of approximately 1.8 years, a
weighted average exercise price of $4.65, and are included in the
table below at December 31, 2019.
The Company uses a combination of option-pricing models to estimate
the fair value of the warrants including the Monte Carlo, Lattice
and Black-Scholes.
A summary of the warrant activity is presented in the following
table:
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
2,710,066
|
Issued
|
3,511,815
|
Expired
/ cancelled
|
(120,606)
|
Exercised
|
(224,295)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2018
|
5,876,980
|
Issued
|
1,415,000
|
Expired
/ cancelled
|
–
|
Exercised
|
(1,053,798)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2019
|
6,238,182
|
Warrant Modification – loss on modification of
warrants
In July
2019, Mr. Grover, a beneficial owner of in excess of five percent
of the Company’s outstanding common shares, acquired 600,242
shares of common stock, upon the partial exercise at $4.60 per
share of a 2014 Warrant to purchase 782,608 shares of common stock
held by him. In connection with such exercise, the Company received
approximately $2,761,000 from Mr. Grover and issued to Mr. Grover
50,000 shares of restricted common stock as an inducement fee
(“Inducement Shares”) and agreed to extend the
expiration date of the remaining unexercised 2014 Warrant held by
him to December 15, 2020 with respect to 182,366 shares of common
stock, in addition the warrant exercise price was adjusted to
$4.75. The 2014 Warrant was classified as a liability.
Between
July and August 2019, two investors from the Company’s 2014
private placement acquired 34,238 shares in the aggregate of the
Company’s common stock upon exercise of their 2014 Warrants.
The investors used the proceeds from their 2014 Note in the amount
of $100,000 and $75,000 which was payable on July 31, 2019 and
August 14, 2019, respectively, by the Company and applied this
amount to the exercise of the warrants. In connection with the
exercise, the Company paid to the investor’s the remaining
balance due on their respective 2014 Note including interest in the
aggregate of approximately $19,000, In addition, as an inducement
to exercise the 2014 Warrant an additional 2,500 Inducement Shares
was issued to one of the investors. The Company recorded in the
aggregate approximately $161,000 related to the noncash portion of
the warrant exercises. The 2014 Warrant was classified as a
liability.
In
August 2019, one investor from the Company’s 2014 private
placement acquired 48,913 shares of the Company’s common
stock upon exercise of their 2014 Warrant. In connection with the
exercise, the Company received approximately $225,000 and issued as
an inducement to exercise the 2014 Warrant issued an additional
5,750 Inducement Shares. The 2014 Warrant was classified as a
liability. The Company also agreed to amend a warrant issued to the
placement agent for the 2014 private placement to purchase 44,107
shares of common stock at $7.00 per share, and a warrant issued to
purchase 60,407 shares of common stock at $4.60 per share of common
stock, both of which were to expire on September 10, 2019
(collectively, the “placement agent warrants”), to
extend the expiration date of the placement agent warrants to
December 15, 2020 for assistance in connection with the above
transaction with Mr. Grover. The placement agent warrants were
classified as equity.
In
August 2019, one investor from the Company’s Series C
offering acquired 63,156 shares of common stock of the Company,
upon the exercise at $4.75 per share of a preferred warrant to
purchase 63,156 shares of common stock held by them. In connection
with such exercise, the Company received approximately $300,000
from the investor, issued to the investor 6,000 Inducement Shares.
The preferred warrant was classified as equity.
The
Company considered the guidance of ASC 470-20-40, Debt with Conversion and Other
Options, ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees and ASC
718-20-35, Awards Classified as Equity to determine the
appropriate accounting treatment to record the impact of the
modification of the warrants and the inducement shares issued upon
the exercise of the warrants. The Company concluded that the
inducement of shares and the change in the terms of the warrants
were considered modification of the warrant terms.
The
liability classified warrants were measured before and after the
modification with changes in the fair value recorded to earnings.
The fair value of the inducement shares was recorded as a loss on
modification of warrants and a credit to additional paid in
capital/common stock. Some of the equity-classified warrants were
modified by issuing common shares, not called for by the warrant
agreement, to induce exercise of the warrant. Other
equity-classified warrants, such as the Placement Agent Warrants,
were modified by increasing the exercise period of the warrants.
All of these changes are considered modifications of the warrant
terms.
These
modifications result in the recognition of incremental fair value.
Incremental fair value is equal to the difference between the fair
value of the modified warrant and the fair value of the original
warrant immediately before it was modified. Based on the above
guidance, the incremental fair value of the warrants was recognized
immediately, as a non-operating expense, since the warrants were
not subject to vesting conditions.
The
fair value of the placement agent warrants was estimated in July
2019 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model both before and
after modification. The increase in fair value was recognized as a
debit to loss on modification of warrants expense and a credit to
additional paid-in capital. The fair value of the inducement shares
issued with the preferred warrant was calculated as the number of
shares issued times the per share price of the Company’s
common stock on the exercise date in August 2019. The recorded a
loss on modification of warrants of approximately $876,000 related to the
above warrant modifications.
The Company concluded that the 2014 Warrant held by Mr. Grover
would continue to be treated as a liability
Stock-based Compensation
The Company’s 2012 Stock Option Plan, as amended (the
“2012 Stock Plan”), authorizes the granting of awards
for up to 9,000,000 shares of common stock. In February 2019, the
Company’s board of
directors received consent of the Company’s majority
stockholders to further amend the 2012 Stock Plan to increase the
number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be
delivered pursuant to awards granted during the life of the 2012
Stock Plan from 4,000,000 to 9,000,000 shares
authorized.
The purpose of the 2012 Stock Plan is to promote the long-term
growth and profitability of the Company by (i) providing key people
and consultants with incentives to improve stockholder value and to
contribute to the growth and financial success of the Company and
(ii) enabling the Company to attract, retain and reward the best
available persons for positions of substantial responsibility. The
2012 Stock Plan allows for the grant of: (a) incentive stock
options; (b) nonqualified stock options; (c) stock appreciation
rights; (d) restricted stock; and (e) other stock-based and
cash-based awards to eligible individuals qualifying under Section
422 of the IRC, in any combination. At December 31, 2019, the
Company had 3,753,656 shares of common stock remaining available
for future issuance under the 2012 Stock Plan.
Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and
restricted stock units included in the consolidated statements of
operations was charged as follows (in thousands):
|
Years
Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Cost
of revenues
|
$95
|
$20
|
Sales
and marketing
|
594
|
117
|
General
and administrative
|
12,008
|
1,316
|
Total
stock-based compensation
|
$12,697
|
$1,453
|
Stock Options
During the year-ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued
2,340,000 10-year incentive stock options to certain employees and
executive officers. The options vest immediately with an exercise
price between $5.56 and $7.47.
During the year-ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 387,586
10-year non-qualified stock options to its nonemployee board
members other nonemployee service providers. The options vest
immediately with an exercise price between $3.60 and
$5.60.
During the year-ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued 537,500
10-year incentive stock options to certain employees and executive
officers. The options vest monthly over 36 months with an exercise
price of $3.92.
During the year-ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued 356,795
10-year non-qualified stock options to its nonemployee board
members other nonemployee service providers. The options vest
immediately with an exercise price between $3.92 and
$4.80.
A summary of stock option activity is presented in the following
table:
|
Number of
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining Contract Life (years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)
|
Outstanding
December 31, 2017
|
1,584,523
|
$4.76
|
6.2
|
$126
|
Issued
|
894,295
|
4.02
|
|
|
Canceled/expired
|
(73,303)
|
5.81
|
|
|
Exercised
|
(11,136)
|
3.80
|
|
33
|
Outstanding
December 31, 2018
|
2,394,379
|
4.45
|
6.9
|
3,049
|
Issued
|
2,727,586
|
6.51
|
|
|
Canceled
/ expired
|
(373,945)
|
5.00
|
|
|
Exercised
|
(110,378)
|
4.23
|
|
252
|
Outstanding
December 31, 2019
|
4,637,642
|
$5.63
|
7.8
|
–
|
Exercisable
December 31, 2019
|
4,145,382
|
$5.75
|
|
–
|
The weighted-average fair value per share of the granted options
for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was approximately
$4.18 and $2.39, respectively.
At December 31, 2019, there was approximately $1,294,000 of total
unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options
granted under the 2012 Stock Plan. The expense is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.9
years.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes to estimate the fair value of
stock options. The use of a valuation model requires the Company to
make certain assumptions with respect to selected model inputs.
Expected volatility is calculated based on the historical
volatility of the Company’s stock price over
the expected term of the option. The expected life is based on
the contractual life of the option and expected employee
exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior. The
risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon
issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life assumed at
the date of the grant.
The following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes model to
calculate the compensation cost of stock options:
|
Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Dividend
yield
|
–
|
–
|
Stock
price volatility
|
77% - 101%
|
67% - 75%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
1.47% - 2.6%
|
2.73% - 2.85%
|
Expected
life of options (in years)
|
1.5 - 6.5
|
3.0 - 6.0
|
Restricted Stock Units
In August 2019, the Company issued 50,000 restricted stock units to one of its
consultants. Vesting occurs monthly over a three-year period with
the first vesting period commencing one month from the grant date.
The fair value of the restricted stock units issued to the
consultant was based on the grant date closing stock price of $4.55
and is recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the
vesting term of the award. As
of December 31, 2019, 5,556 restricted stock units vested from the
August 2019 issuance.
In August 2017, the Company issued restricted stock units for an
aggregate of 500,000 shares of common stock, to its employees and
consultants. These shares of common stock will be issued upon
vesting of the restricted stock units. Full vesting occurs on the
sixth-year anniversary of the grant date, with 10% vesting on the
third-year, 15% on the fourth-year, 50% on the fifth-year and 25%
on the sixth-year anniversary of the vesting commencement date. The
fair value of each restricted stock unit issued to employees was
based on the closing price on the grant date of $4.53 and
restricted stock units issued to consultants were revalued with the
closing stock price at each change in financial period. As of
December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were no restricted stock units
vested from the August 2017 issuance.
The Company adopted ASU 2018-07 on January 1, 2019 and the
stock-based compensation expense for non-employee grants was based
on the closing price of our common stock of $5.72 on December 31,
2018, which was the last business day before we adopted ASU
2018-07.
A summary of restricted stock unit activity is presented in the
following table:
|
Number of Shares
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
500,000
|
Issued
|
–
|
Canceled
|
(25,000)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2018
|
475,000
|
Issued
|
50,000
|
Canceled
|
(67,500)
|
Vested
|
(5,556)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2019
|
451,944
|
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized
approximately $289,000 stock-based compensation expense. At
December 31, 2019, total unrecognized stock-based compensation
expense related to restricted stock units to employees and
consultants was approximately $1,340,000, which will be recognized
over a weighted average period of 3.6 years. As of December 31,
2019 and 2018, there were no restricted stock units
vested.
Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies
Credit Risk
The Company maintains cash balances at various financial
institutions primarily located in the U.S. Accounts held at the
U.S. institutions are secured, up to certain limits, by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation. At times, balances may exceed
federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any
losses in such accounts. There is credit risk related to the
Company’s ability to collect on its accounts receivables from
its major customers. Management believes that the Company is not
exposed to any significant credit risk with respect to its cash and
cash equivalent balances and accounts receivables.
Litigation
The Company is party to litigation at the present time and may
become party to litigation in the future. In general, litigation
claims can be expensive, and time consuming to bring or defend
against and could result in settlements or damages that could
significantly affect financial results. However, it is not possible
to predict the final resolution of any litigation to which the
Company is, or may be party to, and the impact of certain of these
matters on the Company’s business, results of operations, and
financial condition could be material. At December 31, 2019, the
Company believes that existing litigation has no merit and it is
not likely that the Company would incur any losses with respect to
litigation.
Vendor Concentration
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s direct
selling segment made purchases from two vendors, Global Health
Labs, Inc. and Michael Schaeffer, LLC, that individually comprised
more than 10% of total segment purchases and in aggregate
approximated 41% of total segment purchases. For the year ended
December 31, 2018, the Company’s direct selling segment made
purchases from two vendors, Global Health Labs, Inc. and Purity
Supplements, that individually comprised more than 10% of total
segment purchases and in aggregate approximated 41% of total
segment purchases.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the commercial coffee segment
primarily made purchases of processed green coffee beans from four
vendors, INTL FC Stone Merchant Services, Rothfos Corporation,
Sixto Packaging and the Serengeti Trading Co., that individually
comprised more than 10% of total segment purchases and in aggregate
approximated 73% of our total segment purchases. For the year ended
December 31, 2018, the commercial coffee segment made purchases of
processed green coffee beans from two vendors, H&H and Rothfos
Corporation, which individually comprised more than 10% of total
segment purchases and in aggregate approximated 83% of total
segment purchases.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s
commercial hemp segment made purchases from two vendors,
BioProcessing Corp. Ltd. and Xtraction Services, Inc., that
individually comprised more than 10% of total segment purchases and
in aggregate approximated 47% of total segment
purchases.
Customer Concentration
For the
year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s commercial coffee
segment had three customers,
H&H Export, Carnival Cruise
Lines, Inc. and Topco Associates,
LLC, that individually comprised more than 10% of segment
revenue and in aggregate approximated 54% of total segment revenue. For the year
ended December 31, 2018, the Company’s commercial coffee
segment had two customers, H&H Export and Rothfos Corporation,
that individually comprised more than 10% of segment revenue and in
aggregate approximated 52% of total segment revenue.
At
December 31, 2019 and 2018, CLR's accounts receivable balance for
customer related revenue by H&H Export were approximately
$8,707,000 and $673,000, respectively, of which the full amount was
past due at December 31, 2019. As a result, the Company has
reserved $7,871,000 as bad debt related to this accounts receivable
which is net of collections through December 31, 2020.
The Company has purchase obligations related to minimum future
purchase commitments for green coffee to be used in the
Company’s commercial coffee segment. Each individual contract
requires the Company to purchase and take delivery of certain
quantities at agreed upon prices and delivery dates. The
contracts have minimum future purchase commitments of approximately
$4,219,000 at December 31, 2019, which are to be delivered in
2020. The contracts contain provisions whereby any
delays in taking delivery of the purchased product will result in
additional charges related to the extended warehousing of the
coffee product. The Company has not incurred fees
however fees can average approximately $0.01 per pound for every
month of delay.
For the
year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s commercial hemp
segment had three customers, Air Spec, Inc., BioProcessing Corp. Ltd., and Vash Holding,
LLC that individually comprised more than 10% of revenue and
in aggregate approximated 72% of total revenue generated by the
commercial hemp segment.
Note 12. Income Taxes
The income tax provision contains the following components (in
thousands):
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Current:
|
|
|
Federal
|
$(66)
|
$(146)
|
State
|
(59)
|
292
|
Foreign
|
59
|
132
|
Total
current
|
(66)
|
278
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
Federal
|
75
|
239
|
State
|
–
|
(112)
|
Foreign
|
–
|
11
|
Total
deferred
|
75
|
138
|
Income
tax provision
|
$9
|
$416
|
During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the loss before
income taxes related to international operations was $699,000 and
$258,000, respectively.
The reconciliation of income tax computed at the Federal statutory
tax rate to the provision for income taxes is as follows (in
percentages):
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Federal
tax provision at statutory rates
|
21.00%
|
21.00%
|
State
taxes, net of federal benefit
|
4.11%
|
(2.52)%
|
Warrant
modification and debt discount
|
1.97%
|
(6.05)%
|
Effect
of permanent differences and other adjustments
|
(0.22)%
|
(0.60)%
|
Stock
compensation
|
(4.53)%
|
(0.37)%
|
Decrease
in valuation allowance
|
(22.15)%
|
(7.32)%
|
Tax
rate change
|
0.03%
|
(0.87)%
|
Loss
on debt modification
|
(0.35)%
|
(6.12)%
|
AMT
Refund credit
|
0.13%
|
0.73%
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
(0.01)%
|
(2.12)%
|
The material items increasing or decreasing the effective tax rate
include the removal of the change in the fair value of the warrant
liability, accounting for state income taxes, the disallowance of
the stock compensation expense associated with Income Stock
Options, and the change in the valuation allowance associated with
the increase in deferred tax assets that are not "more likely than
not" to be realized in future years.
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount of income
tax determined by applying the applicable U.S. statutory federal
income tax rate to pretax income (loss) as a result of the
following differences (in thousands):
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Income
tax benefit at federal statutory rate
|
$(10,916)
|
$(4,171)
|
Adjustments
for tax effects of:
|
|
|
Foreign
rate differential
|
–
|
74
|
State
taxes, net
|
(2,134)
|
540
|
Warrant
modification and debt discount
|
(1,025)
|
-
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
2,356
|
122
|
Other
nondeductible items
|
53
|
40
|
Deferred
tax asset adjustment
|
-
|
1,202
|
Change
in valuation allowance
|
11,513
|
1,411
|
Loss
on debt modification
|
184
|
1,216
|
AMT
tax refund
|
(66)
|
(146)
|
Tax
rate change
|
(17)
|
173
|
Other
|
61
|
(45)
|
Income tax provision
|
$9
|
$416
|
Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and
liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
Net
operating loss carry-forward
|
$8,203
|
$6,150
|
Amortizable
assets
|
4,229
|
548
|
Inventory
|
1,337
|
884
|
Accruals
and reserves
|
2,249
|
34
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
595
|
312
|
Credit
carry-forward
|
73
|
148
|
Disallowed interest
expense
|
1,886
|
–
|
Operating lease
liability
|
2,092
|
–
|
Charitable
contributions
|
132
|
104
|
Warrants
|
772
|
–
|
Total
deferred tax asset
|
21,568
|
8,180
|
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
|
|
Prepaids
|
(428)
|
(540)
|
Depreciable
assets
|
(95)
|
(148)
|
Right-of-use
|
(2,091)
|
-
|
Debt
discount - Warrants
|
(22)
|
-
|
Total
deferred tax liability
|
(2,636)
|
(688)
|
Deferred
tax
|
18,932
|
7,492
|
Less
valuation allowance
|
(18,857)
|
(7,344)
|
Net
deferred tax asset
|
$75
|
$148
|
The Company has determined through consideration of all positive
and negative evidence that the U.S. deferred tax assets are not
more likely than not to be realized. The Company records a
valuation allowance in the U.S. Federal tax jurisdiction for the
year ended December 31, 2019 to all deferred tax assets and
liabilities. The TCJA enacted
in December 2017 repealed the corporate AMT for tax years beginning
on or after January 1, 2018 and provides for existing AMT tax
credit carryovers to be refunded beginning in 2018. The Company has
approximately $75,000 in refundable credits, and it expects that a
substantial portion will be refunded between 2020 and 2021. As
such, the Company does not have a valuation allowance relating to
the refundable AMT credit carryforward. A valuation allowance
remains on the U.S. state and foreign tax attributes that are
likely to expire before realization. The change in valuation
allowance increased $11,513,000 and $1,411,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
At December 31, 2019, the Company had approximately $13,727,000 in
federal net operating loss carryforwards, which does not expire and
is limited to 80% of federal taxable income when utilized,
$12,636,000 in federal net operating loss carryforwards which begin
to expire in 2029, and $45,222,000 in net operating loss
carryforwards from various states. The Company had $2,965,000 in
net operating losses in foreign jurisdictions.
Pursuant to IRC Section 382, use of net operating loss and credit
carryforwards may be limited if the Company experiences a
cumulative change in ownership of greater than 50% in a moving
three-year period. Ownership changes could impact the
Company's ability to utilize the net operating loss and credit
carryforwards remaining at an ownership change date. The
Company has not completed a Section 382 study.
As a general rule, the Company’s tax returns for fiscal years
after 2016 currently remain subject to examinations by appropriate
tax authorities. None of the Company's tax returns are under
examination at this time.
There was no uncertain tax position related to federal, state and
foreign reporting at December 31, 2019 or 2018.
Note 13. Segment and Geographical
Information
The
Company operates in three
segments: the direct selling segment where products are offered
through a global distribution network of preferred customers and
distributors, the commercial coffee segment where roasted and green
coffee bean products are sold directly to businesses, and the
commercial hemp segment manufactures proprietary systems to provide
end-to-end extraction and processing that allow for the conversion
of hemp feed stock into hemp oil and hemp
extracts.
The Company’s segments reflect the manner in which the
business is managed and how the Company allocates resources and
assesses performance. The Company’s chief operating decision
maker is the Chief Executive Officer. The Company’s chief
operating decision maker evaluates segment performance primarily
based on revenue and segment operating income (loss). The principal
measures and factors the Company considered in determining the
number of reportable segments were revenue, gross margin
percentage, sales channel, customer type and competitive
risks.
The accounting policies of the segments are consistent with those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Segment revenue excludes intercompany revenue eliminated in the
consolidation.
The following tables present selected financial information for
each segment (in thousands):
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Direct
selling
|
$127,011
|
$138,855
|
Commercial
coffee
|
19,544
|
23,590
|
Commercial
hemp
|
887
|
-
|
Total
revenues
|
$147,442
|
$162,445
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
Direct
selling
|
$86,160
|
$94,910
|
Commercial
coffee
|
8,208
|
122
|
Commercial
hemp
|
(408)
|
-
|
Total
gross profit
|
$93,960
|
$95,032
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
Direct
selling
|
$(19,830)
|
$1,733
|
Commercial
coffee
|
(13,934)
|
(4,370)
|
Commercial
hemp
|
(20,023)
|
-
|
Total
operating loss
|
$(53,787)
|
$(2,637)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
Direct
selling
|
$(20,665)
|
$(3,328)
|
Commercial
coffee
|
(11,238)
|
(16,742)
|
Commercial
hemp
|
(20,085)
|
-
|
Total
net loss
|
$(51,988)
|
$(20,070)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
Direct
selling
|
$983
|
$356
|
Commercial
coffee
|
3,683
|
2,866
|
Commercial
hemp
|
5,739
|
-
|
Total
capital expenditures
|
$10,405
|
$3,222
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
Direct
selling
|
$43,221
|
$38,947
|
Commercial
coffee
|
34,348
|
37,026
|
Commercial
hemp
|
12,122
|
-
|
Total
assets
|
$89,691
|
$75,973
|
Total net property and equipment assets located outside the U.S.
were approximately $7,787,000 and $6,217,000 at December 31, 2019
and 2018, respectively.
The Company conducts its operations primarily in the U.S. For the
years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 approximately 14%, of the
Company’s revenue were derived from sales outside the
U.S.
The following table displays revenues attributable to customers
located in the U.S. and internationally (in
thousands):
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Revenues
|
|
|
United
States
|
$125,725
|
$139,985
|
International
|
21,717
|
22,460
|
Total
revenues
|
$147,442
|
$162,445
|
Note 14. Subsequent Events
Series D Preferred Stock
In January 2020, the
Company issued an additional 11,375 shares of Series D preferred
stock upon the partial exercise by the underwriters in the
Company’s public offering of Series D preferred stock of the
overallotment option granted to such underwriters. The
overallotment shares were sold at a price to the public of $22.75
per share, generating additional gross proceeds of approximately
$259,000. (See Note 10)
Series B Preferred Conversion
In March 2020, all outstanding shares of Series B preferred stock
automatically converted into 2 shares of common stock on the
two-year anniversary date of the issuance of the Series B preferred
stock, pursuant to the automatic conversion feature of the Series B
preferred stock. A total of 129,332 shares of Series B preferred
stock outstanding automatically converted into 258,664 shares of
common stock.
Ivan Gandrud Chevrolet, Inc.
In March 2020, the Company entered into an agreement
with Ivan Gandrud Chevrolet, Inc. (“IGC”),
pursuant to which IGC agreed to
provide consulting services for the Company’s commercial hemp
segment in exchange for 125,000 shares of restricted common stock
which were issued as fully earned. The fair value of the
shares issued was approximately $158,000. In addition, the
Company issued a 5-year warrant exercisable for 250,000 shares of
the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $4.75. The
warrant was deemed fully earned. IGC is 100% owned by Daniel
J. Mangless.
March 2020 Private Placement
In March 2020, the Company closed the initial tranche of its March
2020 private placement debt offering of up to an aggregate
principal amount of $5,000,000 together with up to 250,000 shares
of common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the securities purchase
agreement the Company entered into, the Company received proceeds
of $1,000,000 from one investor, Daniel J. Mangless and issued to
Mr. Mangless, (i) a Senior Secured Promissory Note (the
“Mangless Note”) in the principal amount of $1,000,000,
due December 31, 2020, bearing interest at 18.00% per annum,
receiving proceeds of $1,000,000, and (ii) 50,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock in connection with his
investment.
The Mangless Note provided the Company with an option to prepay the
Mangless Note, at any time without permission or penalty. The
Mangless Note is secured pursuant to the terms of a Pledge and
Security Agreement, entered into by the Company and CLR with Mr.
Mangless, whereby the Mangless Note is secured by a first priority
lien granted by CLR in its rights under the pledge and security
agreement, dated March 6, 2020 by and between H&H, H&H
Export and CLR to receive certain payments (the
“Mangless Pledge and Security
Agreement”).
On
December 31, 2020, CLR defaulted on the settlement of the Mangless
Note. On April 13, 2021, the Company entered into a Settlement
Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”), effective as of
April 2, 2021, by and among the Company, CLR, and Mr. Mangless to
settle all claims related to a lawsuit filed by Mr. Mangless
against the Company and CLR, on February 10, 2021, for the alleged
breach by the Company and CLR of their obligations under the
Mangless Note and the Mangless Pledge and Security Agreement (See
Mangless v. Youngevity
International, Inc. and CLR Roasters LLC, Case No. 2021-CA-996-O
(Fla. Cir. Ct.)) (the “Lawsuit”). Pursuant to
the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Mangless has agreed to dismiss the
Lawsuit, with prejudice within five days of the Company making all
of the payments required under the Settlement Agreement. The
Settlement Agreement provides that the Company shall make a
$195,000 payment to Mr. Mangless no later than April 10, 2021 and
make a $101,668 payment to Mr. Mangless beginning on May 1, 2021,
and on the first day of every month thereafter through and
including January 1, 2022, inclusive. In addition, pursuant to the
Settlement Agreement, the Company has agreed to issue Mr. Mangless
1,000,000 shares of its common stock (the “Settlement
Shares”) and that following the date the Company has
completed the audit of its financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2020, if it is then necessary to register the
Settlement Shares with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”) to allow Mr. Mangless to resell the Settlement
Shares in the open market, to file a registration statement on Form
S-1 within 60 days after bringing its audit filings up to date. As
of the date of this filing, the Company is compliant under the
terms of the Settlement Agreement, whereby all required cash
payments have been made timely and the Company has issued Mr.
Mangless the Settlement Shares.
Small Business Administration – Paycheck Protection Program
Loan
In April 2020, the Company’s three segments participated in
the recent “The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act (the “CARES Act”)”, and the Paycheck
Protection Program (the “PPP”) due to losses caused by
the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company received cash in the aggregate
of $3,763,295 from qualified Small Business Administration
(“SBA”) lenders. In addition, under the SBA loans, the
Company’s Direct Selling segment qualified for mortgage
assistance, whereby the Company’s corporate office’s
mortgage has been paid directly from the SBA lenders. The Company
qualified for the mortgage payment program for a period of six
months, as such the SBA has paid approximately $50,000 directly to
the Company’s mortgage holder.
On April 21, 2021, CLR received a second PPP loan in the amount of
$632,895, payable within 60 months if relief for the loan is not
granted. As of the date of this filing, the Company received relief
of $622,500 related to KII.
The Company is currently in communication with the SBA lenders
regarding the potential liability the Company will incur (if any)
in respect for repayment of all the Company’s remaining
unforgiven loans and consideration of any portion of loans
forgiveness of the debt.
Joint Venture Agreement in Nicaragua for Hemp Processing Center
between the CLR and KII and Nicaraguan partner
On April 20 and July 29, 2020, CLR and KII (the “U.S.
Partners”) entered into agreements (“Hemp Joint Venture
Agreement”) with H&H Export and Fitracomex, Inc. (“Fitracomex”)
(collectively “The Nicaraguan Partners”) and
established the hemp joint venture (the “Nicaraguan Hemp Grow
and Extractions Group” or the “Hemp Joint
Venture”).
The
agreement calls for H&H Export to contribute the 2,200-acre
Chaguitillo Farms in Sebaco-Matagalpa, Nicaragua which will be
owned by H&H Export and the U.S. Partners on a 50/50 basis
separate from the Hemp Joint Venture.
The
agreement calls for Nicaraguan Partners to contribute the
excavation and preparation for hemp growth of the 2,200 acres,
installation of electrical service, and the construction of 45,000
square feet of buildings to be used for office, processing,
storage, drying and green house space.
The
U.S. Partners will contribute all the necessary extraction
equipment to convert hemp to crude oil and will also provide the
feminized hemp seeds for the pilot grow program, along with their expertise in the hemp
business. The U.S. Partners will also provide all necessary
working capital as required.
Additionally,
the U.S. Partners’ parent company Youngevity International
Inc., subject to the approval of Nasdaq agreed to issue 1,500,000
shares of its restricted common stock, par value per share, to
Fitracomex. In accordance with the Hemp Joint Venture Agreement, in
July 2020 the Parent Company issued to Fitracomex the agreed upon
shares of restricted common stock. The U.S. Partners agreed to
issue warrants to Fitracomex for the purchase 5,000,000 shares of
the Parent Company common stock at an exercise price of US $1.50,
exercisable for a term of five (5) years after completion
of the construction and upon the
approval by the Parent Company’s stockholders of the proposed
issuance. In addition, the U.S. Partners agreed to use
its best efforts to register the resale of the shares of the Parent
Company’s common stock to Fitracomex under the U.S.
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and make
any necessary applications with Nasdaq to list the
shares.
The
U.S. Partners and H&H Export will serve as the managing
partners with all business decisions will require prior consent and
agreement of both parties. The Net Profits and Net Losses for each
fiscal period shall be allocated among the partners as follows:
twenty five percent (25%) to the Nicaraguan Partners and seventy
five percent (75%) to the U.S. Partners.
Restricted Stock Units
In
August 2020, the Company issued 39,750 shares of common stock due
to partial vesting of restricted stock units, issued to certain
employees and consultants of the Company. (See Note 10,
“Restricted Stock Units”)
Resignation of Certain Board Members
On February 11, 2020, in order to maintain compliance with the
corporate governance requirements of The Nasdaq Capital Market, and
specifically Listing Rule 5605(b) which provides that a listed
company’s board of directors shall be comprised of a majority
of independent directors, Michelle Wallach and Richard Renton, two
non-independent members of the Board of Directors of the Company,
resigned as members of the Board of Directors of the Company. The
notices of resignation provided by each director specifically
stated that the resignations were not the result of any
disagreement with the Company on any matter related to the
Company’s operations, policies or practices.
Appointment of Certain Officers and Board Members
On
October 25, 2020, William G. Thompson resigned from the Board of
Directors of the Company and as a member and chairman of the Audit
Committee to accept the position of Chief Financial Officer of the
Company effective October 26, 2020. In connection with Mr.
Thompson’s appointment, David S. Briskie was appointed Chief
Investment Officer of the Company and resigned as the
Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Briskie also retains
his title as the Company’s President.
On October 27, 2020, Daniel Dorsey was appointed to the Board of
Directors of the Company to fill the vacancy created by Mr.
Thompson’s resignation. Mr. Dorsey serves on the Audit
Committee and his term as a director continues until such time as
his successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his earlier
resignation or removal.
Credit Note
On
December 12, 2020, that certain 8% Credit Note, in the principal
amount of $5,000,000 (the “Credit Note”), issued by
CLR, under that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of December 13,
2018, by and between CLR, Siles Family Plantation Group and Carl
Grover became due and matured in accordance with its terms. CLR did
not make the payment due upon the maturity date of the Credit Note
and is in negotiations with the estate of Mr. Grover regarding a
forbearance. Pursuant to a Security Agreement, dated December 13,
2018, entered into by CLR with Mr. Grover, the Credit Note is
secured by a first priority lien granted by CLR in its green
coffee inventory. In addition, CLR’s subsidiary, Siles Family
Plantation Group S.A. executed a separate Guaranty Agreement,
dated December 13, 2018, and Stephan Wallach and Michelle
Wallach, pledged 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s Common
Stock held by them to secure the Credit Note. As of the date of
this filing, the Company is in default
of the terms of settlement of the Credit Note. (See Note
6)
2019 Private Placement Notes – Convertible Notes
On February 18, 2021, the Company entered into note amendments (the
“6% Note Amendments”) with certain holders of an
aggregate of $1,000,000 in principal amount of those 6% secured
convertible notes (the “6% Notes”), issued by the
Company to such investors (the “Investors”) on February
15, 2019. The 6% Notes had been in default and the 6% Note
Amendments extend the maturity date of the 6% Notes held by the
Investors by one year, to February 15, 2022, as applicable, and
increase the interest rate to 16%. In connection with the
foregoing, as an inducement to enter into the 6% Note Amendments,
the Company issued to certain holders of the 6% Notes an aggregate
of 150,000 shares of its restricted common stock, par value $0.001
per share. As of the date of this filing, the Company is in default
of the terms of settlement set forth in the 6% Note
Amendments. (See Note
7)
On March 16, 2021, the Company entered into note amendments (the
“6% Note Amendments”) with certain note holders of an
aggregate of $1,190,000 in principal amount of those 6% secured
convertible notes (the “6% Notes”), issued by the
Company to such investors (the “Investors”) on February
15, 2019 and March 13, 2019. The 6% Notes had been in default and
the 6% Note Amendments extend the maturity date of the 6% Notes
held by the Investors by one year, to February 15, 2022 and March
15, 2022, as applicable, and increase the interest rate to 12%. In
connection with the foregoing, as an inducement to enter into the
6% Note Amendments, the Company issued to the holders of the 6%
Notes an aggregate of 178,500 shares of its restricted common
stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of the date of this
filing, the Company is in default of the terms of settlement set
forth in the 6% Note
Amendments. (See Note
7)
March 2019 Promissory Note
On February 18, 2021, the Company entered into note amendments (the
“8% Note Amendments”) with the holders of an aggregate
of $2,000,000 in principal amount of those certain 8% secured
promissory notes (the “8% Notes”), issued by the
Company to such investors (the “Investors”) on March
18, 2019. The 8% Notes were not in default at the time of the
amendment. The 8% Note Amendments extend the maturity date of the
8% Notes held by the Investors by one year, to March 18, 2022, as
applicable, and increase the interest rate to 16%. In connection
with the foregoing, as an inducement to enter into the 8% Note
Amendments, the Company issued to certain holders of the 8% Notes
an aggregate of 400,000 shares of its restricted common stock, par
value $0.001 per share. In addition, we issued one of the note
holders a two-year warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of our common
stock at a price per share of $1.00. As of the date of this
filing, the Company is in default of the terms of settlement set
forth in the 8% Note
Amendments. (See Note
7)
Dividends
Declaration of Monthly Dividends for Series "D" Cumulative
Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock
During
the year ended December 31, 2020, the
Company announced the declaration of its regular monthly dividend
of $0.203125 per share of its 9.75% Series D Cumulative
Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock for each calendar quarter
to holders of record as of the last day of the month in 2020,
payable on the fifteenth day of each calendar month. The
Company paid cash dividends of approximately $1,434,000 during
2020.
Declaration of Monthly Dividend for the 1st Quarter of 2021 for Series "D"
Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock
On January 1, 2021, the Company announced the declaration of its
regular monthly dividend of $0.203125 per share of its
9.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock
(OTCM:YGYIP) for each of January, February and March 2021.
The dividend will be payable on February 15, 2021, March
15, 2021 and April 15, 2021 to holders of record as of January
31, February 28 and March 31, 2021. The Company paid cash dividends
of approximately $360,000 for the three months declared
above.
Declaration of Monthly Dividend for the 2nd Quarter of 2021 for Series "D"
Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock
On April 12, 2021, the Company announced the declaration of its
regular monthly dividend of $0.203125 per share of its
9.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock
(OTCM:YGYIP) for each of April, May and June 2021. The
dividend will be payable on May 17, 2021, June 15, 2021 and
July 15, 2021 to holders of record as of April 30, May 31 and
June 30, 2021. The Company paid cash dividends of approximately
$120,000 for each month of April and May 2021 on May 17, 2021 and
June 15, 2021, respectively. The Company intends to pay in cash
approximately $120,000 for the month of June 2021 declared
above.
Auditor Appointment & Nasdaq Delisting
On October 25, 2020, the Company’s Audit Committee
approved the appointment of MaloneBailey,
LLP (“MaloneBailey”) as its new independent
registered public accounting firm responsible for auditing its
financial statements. On October 12, 2020, the Board of Directors
was notified by its then registered independent certified public
accounting firm, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., of San Diego, CA that
it had resigned, effective immediately. Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
had served as the Company’s registered independent certified
public accountants since 2011.
On November 18, 2020, the Company received notice from the Nasdaq
Hearings Panel (the “Panel”) that it had determined to
delist the Company’s securities from The Nasdaq Stock Market
LLC (“Nasdaq”) based upon the Company’s
non-compliance with the filing requirements set forth in Nasdaq
Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) for failing to file its Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2019, and Forms 10-Q for the periods
ended March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020. Effective with the
open of the markets on Friday, November 20, 2020, the
Company’s common stock and Series D preferred stock commenced
trading under its trading symbols YGYI and YGYIP on the OTC Markets
system.
Updates with H&H
On
March 6, 2020, CLR entered into a Finance, Security and ARAP
Monetization Agreement (the “Agreement”)
with H&H Export Y CIA. LTDA, and H&H Coffee Group
Export Corp (collectively, “H&H”). H&H is the
agent for the independent green coffee growers from which CLR
purchases its unprocessed coffee beans and H&H also purchases
processed coffee beans from CLR that it sells to third parties. The
owners of H&H are also employees of CLR and manage the La Pita
plantation in Nicaragua for which they receive a percentage of
profit derived from green coffee sales processed in Nicaragua.
Pursuant to the Agreement, H&H has agreed to allow a Nicaraguan
agency (the “Agency”), to advance on behalf of H&H,
approximately $22,000,000 of the $30,100,000 of accounts receivable
owed by H&H to CLR for its purchase of processed green coffee
during the 2019 season. The Agency has also entered into a
$46,500,000 credit facility with H&H to provide funding for
H&H’s future coffee purchases of unprocessed green coffee
from independent producers. Of the 2020 sales amounts to be billed
by CLR for future coffee purchases of processed coffee, CLR will be
paid an additional amount, at a rate of $.225 per pound of
processed green coffee shipped to customers, to be applied to the
remaining outstanding 2019 accounts receivable balance owed by
H&H to CLR. Until such time as the entire accounts receivable
balance is paid in full, H&H has agreed not take any profit
interest. However, given the COVID crisis’ impact on the 2020
growing season and the continued delay in full payment of the 2019
receivable balances, management considers the H&H receivable
impaired at December 31, 2019. Subsequent to the Agreement, CLR
adopted the recognition of recording revenues at net for sales
between CLR and H&H.
On March 2, 2021, CLR entered into a Master Relationship Agreement
(“MA Agreement”) with the owners of H&H in order to
memorialize the various agreements and modifications to those
agreements. Additionally, certain events have occurred that have
kept the parties from complying with the terms of each of the
original agreements and have caused there to be an imbalance with
the respect to the funds owed by one party to the other; therefore
this MA Agreement also sets forth a detailed accounting of the
different business relationships and reconciles the monetary
obligations between each party through the end of fiscal year
2020.
This MA Agreement memorialized the key settlement terms and
established that H&H owes CLR approximately $10,700,000,
described as “H&H Coffee Liability”, that is
composed of:
●
|
past
due accounts receivable owed to CLR from H&H for 2019 and
2020;
|
●
|
the
$5,000,000 note due plus accrued interest on the note;
|
●
|
CLR
lost profits in 2019 and 2020;
|
●
|
the
return of working capital provided by CLR for the 2019 and 2020
green coffee program.
|
The
agreement also includes an offset against amounts owed by H&H
to CLR consisting of:
●
|
H&H’s
25% profit sharing participation for 2019 and 2020;
|
●
|
and an
offset of H&H’s open payables owed by CLR to H&H in
the amount of approximately $243,000.
|
The MA
Agreement provides that approximately $10,700,000 is owed to CLR by
H&H and H&H agrees to satisfy this obligation by providing
CLR a minimum of 20 containers of strictly high grown coffee
(approximately 825,000 pounds of coffee) per month, commencing at
the end of March 2021 and continuing monthly until the aforesaid
amount is paid in full. The MA Agreement stipulates that the
parties have agreed that the coffee to be provided to CLR by
H&H for the shipments described above, that in order to satisfy
H&H’s debt to CLR, shall not be produced on any
plantation that the parties have a joint interest in. CLR has
recorded allowances of $7,871,000 related to the H&H trade
accounts receivable $5,340,000 related to the H&H notes
receivable during the year ended December 31, 2019 due to
H&H’s repayment history and risks associated with
redemption of the receivable in coffee.
Properties Available-for-Sale
In February 2021, the Company determined that certain properties
acquired with the February 2019 KII acquisition were redundant
after KII moved its primary operations to Orlando, FL thereby no
longer needing multiple locations.
In addition, subsequent to the acquisition closing, KII
purchased in February 2019
45-acres in Groveland, FL (“Groveland”). The Company
determined that its original plan for use is not viable at the
present time as KII shifted its focus back on its primary core
business of extraction of cannabinoids and the production of
products for sale with the cannabinoids. Currently KII has listed
for sale its Clermont, FL property which was used as a testing
laboratory facility. On May 26,
2021, the Groveland property was sold for $800,000. KII’s
remaining production property in Mascotte, FL is expected to be
listed for sale by the end of 2021.
Item 9. Changes in
and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
None.
Item 9A.
Controls and
Procedures
Update on Prior Period Disclosure Controls and Procedures and
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Commercial Coffee Segment
On
April 15, 2019, we filed our 2018 Form 10-K disclosing that during
the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2018, we
identified a material weakness (“2018 Material
Weakness”) for our commercial
coffee segment with respect to certain operations in Nicaragua,
relating to not having proper processes and controls in place to
require sufficient documentation of significant agreements and
arrangements in accounting for significant transactions. During the
preparation of our financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2019, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control
over financial reporting associated with revenue recognition within
the coffee segment. These material weaknesses resulted in the
determination that restatements to our financial statements for the
quarters ended March 31, 2019, June 30, 2019, and September 30,
2019 related to revenue recognition within our coffee segment are
required.
During
2019, management implemented a remediation plan that included
updating our current policies and
implementing procedures and controls over the documentation of
significant agreements and arrangements with respect to certain
operations in our commercial coffee segment. This remediation plan
is still in process and we determined that the controls were not
operating effectively,
therefore management determined that these material weaknesses were
not remediated and remained open at the time of this
filing.
Commercial Hemp Segment
On February 12, 2019, we completed the acquisition of Khrysos
Global, Inc. (related to our commercial hemp segment), detailed in
Note 2, to the consolidated financial statements. During our 2019
annual audit we determined that certain fixed assets acquired in
the acquisition and the share price valuation for the common stock
issued as consideration were not fairly valued as of the closing
date which resulted in a decrease to the net assets acquired
including; a) $1,127,000 related to the certain fixed assets, and
b) $1,351,000 related to a change in the fair value of common stock
issuance resulting in an increase to goodwill of $2,478,000
acquired and an adjusted aggregate purchase price of $15,894,000.
Our management concluded that we have a material weakness in our
control procedures related to acquisitions.
These material weaknesses resulted in the determination that
restatements to our financial statements for the quarters ended
March 31, 2019, June 30, 2019, and September 30, 2019 related to
the accounting for acquisitions within our commercial hemp segment
are required.
During
2020, management implemented a remediation plan that included
updating our current policies and
implementing procedures and controls over future acquisitions.
Until the material weaknesses are remediated, and our associated
disclosure controls and procedures improve, there is a risk that a
material error could occur and not be
detected.
Other
At the
end of the second fiscal quarter 2019, we determined that the
aggregate market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates
exceeded $75 million, resulting in accelerated filer status. As a
result, we are now required to obtain an auditor’s
attestation of management’s assessment of internal control
over financial reporting required under Sarbanes-Oxley
Act Section 404(b).
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act
reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and
procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives.
As required by Rule 13a15(b) under the Exchange Act, our management
conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this Annual Report and as disclosed below
determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective as of December 31, 2019. During the course of the quarter ended December
31, 2019, we identified a material weakness in our internal
controls for our commercial coffee segment relating to revenue
recognition on revenue related to green coffee processing that was
initially recorded at gross but should have been recorded at net.
In addition, we identified a material weakness in controls related
to our accounting for acquisitions. During the course of the quarter ended December 31, 2019,
we identified control deficiencies, that individually, or when
aggregated, represent material weaknesses in our internal controls.
As described below a material weakness is a deficiency, or
combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a
reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual
or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected
on a timely basis.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). With the participation
of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019
based on the framework and criteria established by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(“COSO”) in Internal Control Integrated
Framework (2013), and concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as
of the end of the period covered by this annual report, as a result
of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting which is discussed further below.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, has determined that due to the underlying
critical lack of automated reporting systems, trained accounting
and information technology personnel, control designs and
effectiveness, management was unable to review the risk assessment
and the design of the organization's internal control systems to
establish a baseline for ongoing and separate evaluations that
includes assessment of fraud risk, therefore management does not
expect that our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal
control processes will prevent all errors and all
fraud.
Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of the end of the period covered by this report and upon that
discovery, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report
our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that
we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management has assessed these deficiencies and has determined that
they individually and in aggregate led to material
weaknesses. These material weaknesses led to material
misstatements in our financial statements for the periods ending
March 31, 2019, June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019 related to the
recognition of revenue within our commercial coffee segment and our
commercial hemp segment. In order to consider these material
weaknesses fully remediated, we believe additional time is needed
to demonstrate sustainability as it relates to the revised
controls. There were seven general
categories of deficiencies in our internal control over financial
reporting.
Risk
Assessment. We did not have an
effective risk assessment process that defined clear financial
reporting objectives and evaluated risks, including fraud risks,
and risks resulting from changes in the external environment and
business operations, at a sufficient level of detail to identify
all relevant risks of material misstatement across the
entity.
Deficiencies
in the Overall Control Environment. We
have not maintained an effective control environment to provide
reasonable assurance relating to operations, reporting, and
compliance for the purpose of meeting the requirements set forth in
the 2013 COSO Framework. More specifically, we did not have (a)
adequate segregation of duties and oversight over material
agreements and arrangements entered into by the Company (b)
adequate information technology systems required to develop
controls and oversight over our existing operations and most recent
acquisitions (c) a sufficient number of personnel with an
appropriate level of US GAAP knowledge and experience to create the
proper environment for effective internal control over financial
reporting and to ensure that (i) there were adequate processes for
oversight, and (ii) there was accountability for the performance of
internal control over financial reporting
responsibilities.
Deficiencies
in the Controls over Monitoring. We
have not maintained effective controls over monitoring to provide
reasonable assurance relating to operations, reporting, and
compliance for the purpose of meeting the requirements set forth in
the 2013 COSO Framework. More specifically, we did not have
adequate oversight processes and procedures that guide individuals
in applying internal control and proper documentation to support
reporting of certain transactions within the financial reporting
and that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of our financial statements will not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis.
Deficiencies
pertaining to a lack of human resources within our finance and
accounting functions. We have not maintained
sufficient accounting personnel with the appropriate level of
knowledge, experience and training commensurate with maintaining an
effective control environment, within the current operational
environment, to meet the financial reporting requirements of a
publicly traded company with international operations. We did not
have a sufficient number of trained resources with assigned
responsibility and accountability for the design, operation and
documentation of internal control over financial reporting in
accordance with the 2013 COSO Framework. The result of the lack of
sufficient accounting personnel has led to us not having effective
and codified accounting policies and procedures throughout our
Company, including our subsidiaries, which can lead to inconsistent
accounting treatment of transactions. The lack of sufficient
personnel has also resulted in a failure to maintain appropriate
segregation of duties throughout the internal control over
financial reporting process. We have had numerous instances where
review and approval is performed by the same employee negating any
monitoring or approval controls.
Deficiencies
pertaining to the lack of controls or ineffectively designed
controls impacting our financial reporting. Our control design analysis and process
walkthroughs disclosed a number of instances where review approvals
were not sufficiently documented and retained, where established
policies and procedures were not defined, and controls were not in
place to adequately (i) address relevant risks, (ii) provide
evidence of performance, (iii) provide appropriate segregation of
duties, or (iv) operate at a level of precision to identify all
potentially material errors.
Deficiencies
related to information technology control design and operating
effectiveness weaknesses. The
Company did not have formalized information technology policies and
procedures which the lack thereof could result in (1) unauthorized
system access, (2) application changes being implemented without
adequate reliability testing, and (3) over reliance on spreadsheet
applications without quality control
assurances.
Deficiencies
related to failures in operating effectiveness of the internal
control over financial reporting. Certain internal control procedures were developed
or enhanced during the latter part of 2019. When testing occurred
to confirm the effectiveness of the internal control over financial
reporting, controls were not operating effectively. Insufficient
time remained to remediate these material weaknesses prior to
year-end.
The
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2019 has been audited by MaloneBailey LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, and expressed an
adverse opinion on the operating effectiveness of the Company's
internal control over financial reporting as stated in their report
which appears herein.
Changes in Our Controls
Management’s Remediation Efforts
Management
has been implementing and continues to implement measures designed
to ensure that control deficiencies contributing to the material
weaknesses are remediated, such that these controls are designed,
implemented, and operating effectively. The remediation measures include or are expected
to include the following:
●
Implementing
or enhancing the Company’s infrastructure to ensure
appropriate software and reporting tools are in place to ensure
financial reporting systems and processes are reporting
effectively. Pending the Company’s ability to secure timely
financial resources to implement such improvements in its
processes.
●
Review
and update, as necessary, documentation of relevant processes,
policies and procedures, and design of relevant controls, with
respect to the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. The Company intends to implement any necessary changes
as a result of the deficiencies identified in its relevant
processes, policies and procedures as promptly as practical and to
satisfy documentation requirements under Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
●
Seek
to ensure that the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting is properly designed, implemented, operating effectively,
and appropriately documented by (i) enhancing the design of
existing control activities and/or implementing additional control
activities, as needed, (ii) monitoring the operating effectiveness
of those controls, and (iii) ensuring that sufficient documentation
exists to evidence the design, implementation, and operation of
those controls.
●
Execute
and monitor the remediation plan, with appropriate executive
sponsorship and with the assistance of outside consultants, to
enhance the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting and accomplish the goals of the remediation as set forth
above.
●
Continue
to seek, train and retain individuals that have the appropriate
skills and experience related to designing, operating and
documenting internal controls.
We intend to adopt additional remediation measures related to the
identified control deficiencies as necessary as well as to continue
to evaluate our internal controls on an ongoing basis in order to
upgrade and enhance when appropriate. Our audit committee has taken
an active role in reviewing and discussing the internal control
deficiencies with our auditors and financial management. Our
management and the audit committee will actively monitor the
implementation and effectiveness of the remediation efforts
undertaken by our financial management. We believe that
these actions will remediate material weaknesses. The material
weaknesses will not be considered remediated, however, until the
applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time and
management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are
operating effectively.
Item 9B.
Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate
Governance
Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Executive
Officers
Information with respect to our current directors and executive
officers as of May 28, 2021 is shown below.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position held Since
|
|
Position
|
Stephan Wallach
|
|
54
|
|
2011*
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
William Thompson
|
|
60
|
|
2020
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
David Briskie
|
|
60
|
|
2011
|
|
President, Chief Investment Officer and Director
|
Michelle Wallach
|
|
50
|
|
2011
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Sallwasser
|
|
66
|
|
2017
|
|
Director
|
Kevin Allodi
|
|
64
|
|
2017
|
|
Director
|
Daniel Dorsey
|
|
44
|
|
2020
|
|
Director
|
* Since 1996, Stephan Wallach
has been a director of AL Global, Corporation the private company
that merged with and into Javalution Coffee Company, our
predecessors in 2011.
Stephan Wallach, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
Mr. Stephan Wallach was appointed to the position of Chief
Executive Officer on July 11, 2011 pursuant to the terms of the
merger agreement between Youngevity® and Javalution. He
previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of AL
Global Corporation. He has served as a director of our Company
since inception and was appointed Chairman of the Board on January
9, 2012. In 1996, Mr. Wallach and the Wallach family together
launched our Youngevity® division and served as its co-founder
and Chief Executive Officer from inception until the merger with
Javalution. Mr. Wallach’s extensive knowledge about our
business operations and our products makes him an exceptional board
member.
David Briskie, President, Chief Investment
Officer and Director
Mr. David Briskie was appointed to the position of President on
October 30, 2015 and Chief Investment Officer on October 25, 2020.
Mr. Briskie was appointed to the position of Chief Financial
Officer on May 15, 2012 and resigned his position on October 25,
2020. Prior to that, Mr. Briskie served as President of Commercial
Development, a position he was appointed to on July 11, 2011
pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement between
Youngevity® and Javalution. From February 2007 until the
merger he served as the Chief Executive Officer and director of
Javalution and since September 2007 has served as the Managing
Director of CLR Roasters. Prior to joining Javalution in 2007, Mr.
Briskie had an 18-year career with Drew Pearson Marketing
(“DPM”), a consumer product company marketing headwear
and fashion accessories. He began his career at DPM in 1989 as
Executive Vice President of Finance and held numerous positions in
the Company, including vice president of marketing, chief financial
officer, chief operating officer and president. Mr. Briskie
graduated magna cum laude from Fordham University with a major in
marketing and finance. Mr. Briskie’s experience in financial
matters, his overall business understanding, as well as his
familiarity and knowledge regarding public companies make him an
exceptional board member.
Michelle G. Wallach,
Chief Operating
Officer
Ms. Michelle Wallach was appointed to the position of Chief
Operating Officer on July 11, 2011 pursuant to the terms of the
merger agreement between Youngevity® and Javalution. She
previously served as Corporate Secretary and Manager of AL Global
Corporation and served as a director on the Board of Directors from
2011 until February 11, 2020. She has a background in network
marketing, including more than 10 years in distributor management.
Her career in network marketing began in 1991 in Portland, Oregon,
where she developed a nutritional health product distributorship.
In 1996, Ms. Wallach and the Wallach family together launched our
Youngevity® division and served as its co-founder and Chief
Operations Officer from inception until the merger with Javalution.
Ms. Wallach has an active role in promotion, convention and event
planning, domestic and international training, and product
development.
William Thompson, Director
Mr. William Thompson was appointed to the position of Chief
Financial Officer on October 25, 2020. Mr. William Thompson was
appointed to our board of directors on June 10, 2013 until his
resignation from our board of directors on October 25, 2020. He
served as the Chief Financial Officer of Broadcast Company of the
Americas, a radio station operator in San Diego, California from
2013 to 2019. He served as Corporate Controller for the Company
from 2011 to March 2013 and for Breach Security, a developer of web
application firewalls, from 2007 to 2010. Prior to 2007, Mr.
Thompson was Divisional Controller for Mediaspan Group and Chief
Financial Officer of Triathlon Broadcasting Company.
Mr. Thompson’s achievements in
financial matters and his overall business understanding make him
an exceptional board member.
Paul Sallwasser, Director
Mr. Paul Sallwasser was appointed to our board of directors on June
5, 2017. Mr. Sallwasser is a certified public accountant, joined
the audit staff of Ernst & Young LLP in 1976 and remained with
Ernst & Young LLP for 38 years. Mr. Sallwasser served a broad
range of clients primarily in the healthcare and biotechnology
industries of which a significant number were SEC registrants. He
became a partner of Ernst & Young in 1988 and from 2011 until
he retired from Ernst & Young LLP Mr. Sallwasser served in the
national office as a member of the Quality and Regulatory Matters
Group working with regulators and the PCAOB. Mr. Sallwasser has
served as the chief executive officer of Florida Community Health
Network, a private equity fund that is focused on investing in
healthcare companies in the South Florida area since 2015. Mr.
Sallwasser’s qualification as an “audit committee
financial expert,” as defined by the rules of the SEC, and
his vast audit experience serves as the basis for his position on
the Board and its audit committee. Mr. Sallwasser serves as a
director on the Board of Directors of Elys Game Technology, Corp.
(Nasdaq:ELYS).
Kevin Allodi, Director
Mr. Kevin Allodi was appointed to our board of directors on June 5,
2017. Mr. Allodi has served as the CEO and Co-Founder of Philo
Broadcasting, a media holding company that includes award-winning
digital content studio Philo Media and a commercial television
production company, Backyard Productions since 2012. Philo is
headquartered in Chicago with production offices in Los Angeles.
Prior to joining Philo, Mr. Allodi spent six years with
infrastructure software startup Portal Software (NASDAQ:PRSF) where
he was President/Corporate VP and ten years with the Communications
Industry Division of Computer Sciences Corporation (NYSE:CSC) where
he was VP Global Billing & Customer Care practice. Currently,
Mr. Allodi also serves as a Managing Partner of KBA Holdings, LLC,
a private equity investment firm active in the digital media,
hi-tech, alternative energy and bio-tech industries. Mr. Allodi
serves as a partner, limited partner, director and/or advisory
board member to several portfolio companies including G2T3V LLC,
uBid, Ridge Partners LLC, IMI Innovations and is on the board of
directors of FNBC Bank & Trust. Mr. Allodi’s business experience and
investment experience serves as the basis for his position on the
Board and its audit committee.
Daniel Dorsey, Director
Mr. Daniel Dorsey was appointed to our board of directors on
October 27, 2020. Mr. Dorsey’s past corporate experience
includes serving roles in financial and/or accounting management
and/or as a financial officer for private companies. Since July
2019, Mr. Dorsey has been the Senior Vice President of Finance for
MacuLogix, Inc., a medical device equipment manufacturer providing
eye care professionals with the instrument, tools and education
needed to effectively diagnose, manage, and treat patients with
age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Mr. Dorsey was a
partner of Capital Market Solutions, LLC, from September 2018 to
June 2019 where he was involved with creating strategic initiatives
with companies ranging from legacy media enterprises to digital
start-ups. From October 2016 to August 2018, he was Vice President
and Corporate Controller of Rodale, Inc., an American publisher of
health and wellness magazines, books, and digital properties. From
August 2015-September 2016, Mr. Dorsey also served as the Chief
Financial Officer of Hudson News Distributors, LLC, the second
largest distributor of magazines and books in the USA. From March
2014-March 2015, he served as the Senior Vice President and
Corporate Controller of the Tribune Publishing Company, (NASDAQ:
TPCO).
Family Relationships
Other than Stephan Wallach and Michelle Wallach, who are husband
and wife, none of our officers or directors has a family
relationship with any other officer or director.
INFORMATION REGARDING THE COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
Committees of the Board of Directors
The board of directors has a standing audit committee, compensation
committee and nominating and corporate governance committee. The
following table shows the directors who are currently members or
Chairman of each of these committees.
Board Members
|
Audit
Committee
|
Compensation
Committee
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee
|
Stephan
Wallach
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
David
Briskie
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Paul
Sallwasser
|
Chairman
|
Chairman
|
Member
|
Kevin
Allodi
|
Member
|
Member
|
Chairman
|
Daniel
Dorsey
|
Member
|
-
|
-
|
William Thompson (1)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1)
|
Mr. William Thompson was a member of the board of directors until
October 25, 2020. On
October 25, 2020, Mr. Thompson resigned from the Board of Directors
of the Company and as a member and chairman of the Audit Committee
to accept the position of Chief Financial Officer of the
Company.
|
Director Independence
Our
board of directors has determined that Daniel Dorsey, Paul
Sallwasser and Kevin Allodi are each an independent director in
accordance with the definition of independence applied by the
Nasdaq Stock Market. Although our securities are not listed on the
Nasdaq Capital Market, we apply the Nasdaq Capital Market
independence standards when evaluating the independence of our
directors. Stephan Wallach and David Briskie are not independent
due to their management roles.
Board Committees
Audit Committee. The
audit committee of the board of directors currently consists of
Paul Sallwasser (Chair), Daniel Dorsey and Kevin Allodi. The
functions of the audit committee include the retention of our
independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing and
approving the planned scope, proposed fee arrangements and results
of the Company’s annual audit, reviewing the adequacy of the
Company’s accounting and financial controls and reviewing the
independence of the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm. The Board has determined that Paul Sallwasser,
Daniel Dorsey and Kevin Allodi are each an “independent
director” under the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock
Market. The board of directors has also determined that Mr.
Sallwasser is an “audit committee financial expert”
within the applicable definition of the SEC. The audit committee is
governed by a written charter approved by the board of directors, a
copy of which is available on our website at www.ygyi.com.
Information contained on our website are not incorporated by
reference into and do not form any part of this registration
statement. We have included the website address as a factual
reference and do not intend it to be an active link to the
website.
Compensation Committee. The compensation committee of the board of
directors currently consists of Paul Sallwasser (Chair) and Kevin
Allodi. The functions of the compensation committee include the
approval of the compensation offered to our executive officers and
recommending to the full board of directors the compensation to be
offered to our directors, including our Chairman. Both of the
members of the compensation committee are independent under the
listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market. In addition, the
members of the compensation committee qualify as
“non-employee directors” for purposes of Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act and as “outside directors” for
purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. The compensation committee is governed by a written
charter approved by the board of directors, a copy of which is
available on our website at www.ygyi.com.
Information contained on our website
are not incorporated by reference into and do not form any part of
this registration statement. We have included the website
address as a factual reference and do not intend it to be an active
link to the website.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The nominating
and corporate governance committee of the board of directors
currently consists of Kevin Allodi (Chair) and Paul Sallwasser. All
of the members of the nominating and corporate governance committee
are independent under the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock
Market. Our nominating and corporate governance committee performs
several functions including identifying individuals to become
members of the board of directors, recommending appointments to the
board of directors and committees as well as assessing the
appropriate size of the board of directors. In the event that
vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the nominating and
corporate governance committee will consider various potential
candidates who may come to their attention through current board
members, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons.
The committee seeks individuals who have an inquisitive and
objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment, and
the talent and expertise to understand, and provide sound and
prudent guidance with respect to, our activities, operations and
interests. Candidates must also be individuals who have the highest
personal and professional integrity, who have demonstrated
exceptional ability and judgment, and who are likely to be the most
effective, in conjunction with the other members of the board of
directors, in collectively serving the long-term interests of
stockholders. The nominating and corporate governance committee
will consider candidates proposed for nomination by our significant
stockholders. Stockholders may propose candidates by submitting the
names and supporting information to: board of directors in care of
the Corporate Secretary, Youngevity International, Inc., 2400
Boswell, Chula Vista, California 91914. Supporting information
should include (a) the name and address of the candidate and the
proposing stockholder, (b) a comprehensive biography of the
candidate and an explanation of why the candidate is qualified to
serve as a director taking into account the criteria identified in
our corporate governance guidelines, (c) proof of ownership, the
class and number of shares, and the length of time that the shares
of our voting securities have been beneficially owned by each of
the candidate and the proposing stockholder, and (d) a letter
signed by the candidate stating his or her willingness to serve, if
elected. The nominating
and corporate governance committee is governed by a written charter
approved by the board of directors, a copy of which is available on
our website at www.ygyi.com.
Information contained on our website
are not incorporated by reference into and do not form any part of
this registration statement. We have included the website
address as a factual reference and do not intend it to be an active
link to the website.
Other Committees. From time to
time the board of directors may establish ad hoc committees to
address matters. During 2020, the board of directors established a
special transaction committee comprised of Kevin Allodi (Chair) and
Paul Sallwasser.
Board Leadership Structure
We currently have the same person serving as our Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer and we do not have a formal
policy on whether the same person should (or should not) serve as
both the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Mr.
Briskie currently serves as our President and Chief Investment
Officer. Due to the size of our Company, we believe that this
structure is appropriate. Mr. Wallach has served as the Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer since AL Global Corporation,
the private company that he owned, merged into our predecessor in
2011 and he served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of AL Global Corporation, since inception. In serving as
Chairman of the Board, Mr. Wallach serves as a significant resource
for other members of management and the board of
directors.
We
believe that our Company and its stockholders are best served by
having Mr. Wallach, our Chief Executive Officer, serve as
Chairman of the board of directors. Mr. Wallach’s
combined role as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer promotes
unified leadership and direction for the board of directors and
executive management, and it allows for a single, clear focus for
the chain of command to execute our strategic initiatives and
business plans.
We do not have a separate lead director. We believe the combination
of Mr. Wallach as our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer and Mr. Briskie as our President and Chief Investment
Officer has been an effective structure for our Company. Our
current structure is operating effectively to foster productive,
timely and efficient communication among the independent directors
and management. We do have active participation in our committees
by our independent directors. Each committee performs an active
role in overseeing our management and there are complete and open
lines of communication with the management and independent
directors.
Oversight of Risk Management
The board of directors has an active role, as a whole and also at
the committee level, in overseeing management of our risks. The
board of directors regularly reviews information regarding our
strategy, finances and operations, as well as the risks associated
with each.
Overview
Corporate Governance Guidelines
We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of business
conduct and corporate governance, which we believe are fundamental
to the overall success of our business, serving our stockholders
well and maintaining our integrity in the marketplace. Our
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics, together with our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws and
the charters of our Board Committees, form the basis for our
corporate governance framework. As discussed above, our board of
directors has established three standing committees to assist it in
fulfilling its responsibilities to us and our stockholders: the
audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and
corporate governance committee.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are designed to ensure
effective corporate governance of our Company. Our Corporate
Governance Guidelines cover topics including, but not limited to,
director qualification criteria, director responsibilities,
director compensation, director orientation and continuing
education, communications from stockholders to the Board,
succession planning and the annual evaluations of the Board and its
Committees. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed
regularly by the Board and revised when appropriate.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies
to all of our employees, officers and directors. This Code
constitutes a “code of ethics” as defined by the rules
of the SEC. Copies of the code may be obtained free of charge from
our website, www.ygyi.com.
Any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of our code of
ethics that applies to any of our executive officers will be posted
on our website in accordance with the rules of the
SEC.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section
16 of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission require our directors and executive officers
and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock to file
reports, within specified time periods, indicating their holdings
of and transactions in our common stock and derivative securities.
Based solely on a review of such reports provided to us and written
representations from such persons regarding the necessity to file
such reports, we are not aware of any failures to file reports or
report transactions in a timely manner during our fiscal year ended
December 31, 2019.
Item 11. Executive
Compensation.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth a summary of cash and non-cash
compensation awarded, earned or paid for services rendered to us
during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 by our
“named executive officers,” consisting of each
individual serving as (i) principal Chief Executive Officer, (ii)
our principal Chief Financial Officer, and (iii) Chief Operating
Officer.
Named
Executive Officer
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Option
Awards (2)
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Stephan Wallach (1)
|
2019
|
375,000
|
-
|
2,390,900
|
2,765,900
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
2018
|
375,000
|
59,439
|
-
|
434,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Briskie (1)(2)(3)
|
2019
|
375,000
|
-
|
4,119,797
|
4,494,797
|
President and Former Chief Financial Officer
|
2018
|
375,000
|
59,439
|
566,500
|
1,000,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michelle Wallach (1)
|
2019
|
222,660
|
-
|
2,390,900
|
2,613,560
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
2018
|
214,583
|
-
|
-
|
214,583
|
(1)
|
Mr.
Stephan Wallach, Mr. David Briskie, and Ms. Michelle Wallach have
direct and or indirect (beneficially) distributor positions in our
Company that pay income based on the performance of those
distributor positions in addition to their base salaries, and the
people and or companies supporting those positions based upon the
contractual agreements that each and every distributor enter into
upon engaging in the network marketing business. The contractual
terms of these positions are the same as those of all the other
individuals that become distributors in our Company. There are no
special circumstances for these officers/directors. Mr. Stephan
Wallach and Ms. Michelle Wallach received or beneficially received
an aggregate of $289,096 and $330,429 in 2019 and 2018,
respectively related to their distributor positions, which are not
included above. Mr. Briskie beneficially received $16,299 and
$17,209 in 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to his
spouse’s distributor position, which is not included
above.
|
|
|
(2)
|
We
use a Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value
of the stock option grant in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
Expected volatility is calculated based on the historical
volatility of the Company’s stock. The risk-free interest
rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a term equal to the
expected life of the options at the time of grant. The amounts do
not represent the actual amounts paid to or released by any of the
Named Executive Officers during the respective periods. See the
table below Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-End.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Mr.
David Briskie was the Company’s Chief Financial Officer
through December 31, 2019. On October 25, 2020, Mr. Briskie was
appointed Chief Investment Officer of the Company and resigned as
the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The
table below reflects all outstanding equity awards made to each of
the named executive officers that are outstanding as of December
31, 2019. We currently grant stock-based awards pursuant to our
2012 Stock Option Plan.
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
No. Of
|
|
No. Of
|
|
|
No.
|
Market Value
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Of Shares
|
Of Shares or
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
Option
|
|
or Units
|
Units of
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
Exercise
|
Option
|
of Stock
|
Stock That
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Options (#)
|
Price
|
Expiration
|
That Have Not
|
Have Not
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
($)
|
Date
|
Vested (#)
|
Vested ($)
|
Stephan
Wallach
|
125,000
|
(1)
|
-
|
$4.4
|
5/31/2022
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
(2)
|
-
|
$7.47
|
2/5/2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David
Briskie
|
250,000
|
(3)
|
-
|
$4.4
|
5/31/2022
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(4)
|
-
|
$3.6
|
10/31/2023
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(5)
|
-
|
$3.8
|
10/30/2024
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(6)
|
150,000
|
$5.4
|
12/27/2026
|
|
|
|
118,150
|
(7)
|
131,850
|
$3.92
|
7/24/2028
|
250,000(8)
|
$815,000
|
|
541,471
|
(9)
|
-
|
$5.56
|
1/9/2029
|
|
|
|
458,529
|
(10)
|
-
|
$7.47
|
2/5/2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michelle
Wallach
|
125,000
|
(11)
|
-
|
$4.4
|
5/31/2022
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
(12)
|
-
|
$7.47
|
2/5/2029
|
|
|
(1)
|
125,000
stock options granted on May 31, 2012, vested and
exercisable.
|
(2)
|
500,000
stock options granted on February 5, 2019, vested and
exercisable.
|
(3)
|
250,000
stock options granted on May 31, 2012, vested and
exercisable.
|
(4)
|
50,000
stock options granted on October 31, 2013, vested and
exercisable.
|
(5)
|
100,000
stock options granted on October 30,
2014, vested and are exercisable.
|
(6)
|
250,000
stock options granted on December 27,
2016, 100,000 stock options vested and are exercisable, with the
remaining option shares vesting in equal annual amounts over the
next three years as of December 31, 2019.
|
(7)
|
250,000
stock options granted on July 24,
2018, 118,150 stock options vested and are exercisable, with the
remaining option shares vesting in equal annual amounts over the
next three years as of December 31, 2019.
|
(8)
|
250,000
restricted stock units were granted on
August 9, 2017, each unit representing contingent right to receive
one share of common stock, vesting as follows: (i) Year 3 - 25,000
shares; (ii) Year 4 – 37,500 shares; (iii) Year 5 - 125,000
shares; and (iv) Year 6 – 62,500 shares; if Mr. Briskie
continues to serve as an executive officer or otherwise is not
terminated for cause prior to such dates. The market value of the
restricted stock units was multiplied by the closing market price
of our common stock at the end of the 2019 fiscal year, which was
$3.26 on December 31, 2019 (the last business day of the 2019
fiscal year.)
|
(9)
|
541,471
stock options granted on January 9, 2019, vested and
exercisable.
|
(10)
|
458,
529 stock options granted on February 5, 2019, vested and
exercisable.
|
(11)
|
125,000
stock options granted on May 31, 2012, vested and
exercisable.
|
(12)
|
500,000
stock options granted on February 5, 2019, vested and
exercisable.
|
Employment Agreements
Our executive officers work as at-will employees. We do not have
any written employment agreements with any of our executive
officers.
Code Section 162(m) Provisions
Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, or the Code,
generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for
compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the Chief Executive
Officer or any of the four most highly compensated officers.
Performance-based compensation arrangements may qualify for an
exemption from the deduction limit if they satisfy various
requirements under Section 162(m). Although we consider the impact
of this rule when developing and implementing our executive
compensation programs, we believe it is important to preserve
flexibility in designing compensation programs. Accordingly, we
have not adopted a policy that all compensation must qualify as
deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code. While our stock
options are intended to qualify as “performance-based
compensation” (as defined by the Code), amounts paid under
our other compensation programs may not qualify as
such.
2019 Director Compensation
The following table sets forth information for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2019 regarding the compensation of our directors
who at December 31, 2019 were not also named executive
officers.
Director
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
|
Option
Awards ($)(1)
|
Other
Compensation ($)
|
Total ($)
|
Richard Renton (2)
|
-
|
275,611
|
-
|
275,611
|
William
Thompson (3)
|
-
|
275,611
|
-
|
275,611
|
Paul
Sallwasser
|
-
|
271,446
|
-
|
271,446
|
Kevin
Allodi
|
-
|
271,446
|
-
|
271,446
|
(1)
|
The amounts in the “Option Awards” column reflect the
dollar amounts recognized as compensation expense for financial
statement reporting purposes for stock options for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2019 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The
fair value of the options was determined using the Black-Scholes
model.
|
(2)
|
Richard Renton was a member of the board of directors until
February 11, 2020.
|
(3)
|
William Thompson was a member of the board of directors until
October 25, 2020.
|
As of December 31, 2019, the following table sets forth the number
of aggregate outstanding option awards held by each of our
directors who were not also named executive officers:
Director
|
Aggregate
Number of
Option Awards
|
Richard Renton (1)
|
117,155
|
William
Thompson (2)
|
129,155
|
Paul
Sallwasser
|
116,655
|
Kevin
Allodi
|
116,655
|
(1)
|
Richard Renton was a member of the board of directors until
February 11, 2020.
|
(2)
|
William Thompson was a member of the board of directors until
October 25, 2020.
|
We grant to non-employee members of the Board of directors upon
appointment, stock options to purchase shares of our common stock
at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common
stock on the date of grant, and additional stock options each year
thereafter for their service. We also reimburse the non-employee
directors for travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
attending board of director and committee meetings. On January 9,
2019, we granted to each non-executive member of the Board of
directors an option to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock,
having an exercise price of $5.56 per share, vesting upon issuance
and expiring ten (10) years from the date of the grant, unless
terminated earlier.
2012 Equity Compensation Plan Information
The 2012 Plan, is our only active equity incentive plan pursuant to
which options to acquire common stock have been granted and are
currently outstanding.
As of December 31, 2019, the number of stock options and restricted
common stock outstanding under the 2012 Plan, the weighted average
exercise price of outstanding options and restricted common stock
and the number of securities remaining available for issuance were
as follows:
Plan category
|
Number of
securities to be issued upon exercise/vesting of outstanding
options and restricted units
under the 2012 Plan (1)
|
Weighted-
Average
exercise
price
of
outstanding
options and restricted units (2)
|
Number of securities remaining available for
future issuance under the 2012 Plan
|
Equity
compensation plan approved by stockholders under 2012
Plan
|
5,089,586
|
$5.63
|
3,753,656
|
Equity
compensation plan not approved by stockholders
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
5,089,586
|
$5.63
|
3,753,656
|
(1)
|
Includes
stock options to purchase 4,637,642 shares of common stock with a
weighted average exercise per share price of $5.63. Also includes
451,944 restricted common stock units with no exercise
price.
|
(2)
|
The
calculation of weighted average exercise price does not include
outstanding restricted units which do not have an exercise
price.
|
On February 23, 2017, our Board of directors received the approval of our stockholders, to
amend the 2012 Plan to increase the number of shares of common
stock available for grant and to expand the types of awards
available for grant under the 2012 Plan. The amendment to the 2012
Plan increased the number of shares of our common stock that may be
delivered pursuant to awards granted during the life of the 2012
Plan from 2,000,000 to 4,000,000 shares authorized (as adjusted for
the 1-for-20 reverse stock split, which was effective on June 7,
2017). On February 15, 2019, our Board of directors received
approval of our stockholder to further amend our 2012 Plan to
increase the number of shares of our common stock that may be
delivered pursuant to awards granted during the life of the 2012
Plan from 4,000,000 to 9,000,000 shares authorized (the “2019
Amendment”). The 2012 Plan as amended allows for the grant
of: (i) incentive stock options; (ii) nonqualified stock options;
(iii) stock appreciation rights; (iv) restricted stock; and (v)
other stock-based and cash-based awards to eligible individuals.
The terms of the awards will be set forth in an award agreement,
consistent with the terms of the 2012 Plan. No stock option is
exercisable later than ten years after the date it is
granted.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial
ownership of our common stock as of June 18, 2021
by:
(1)
|
each
person or group of affiliated persons known by us to be the
beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock;
|
(2)
|
each of
our named executive officers;
|
(3)
|
each of
our directors; and
|
(4)
|
all of
current our executive officers and directors as a
group.
|
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the
rules of the SEC and the information is not necessarily indicative
of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Unless otherwise
indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named
in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with
respect to all shares that they beneficially own, subject to
community property laws where applicable. To our knowledge, no
person or entity, except as set forth below, is the beneficial
owner of more than 5% of the voting power of our common stock as of
the close of business on June 18, 2021.
Under SEC rules, the calculation of the number of shares of our
common stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage
ownership of that person includes both outstanding shares of our
common stock then owned as well as any shares of our common stock
subject to options or warrants held by that person that are
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
June 18, 2021. Shares subject to those
options or warrants for a particular person are not included as
outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of any other person. We have based percentage ownership
of our common stock on 33,975,126 shares of our common
stock outstanding as of June
18, 2021.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned
|
Percentage
Ownership
|
Executive Officers &
Directors (1)
|
|
|
Stephan Wallach, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|
14,627,811(2)
|
42.3%
|
David Briskie, President, Chief Investment Officer and
Director
|
2,395,457(3)
|
6.7%
|
Michelle Wallach, Chief Operating
Officer
|
14,625,000(2)
|
42.3%
|
William Thompson, Chief Financial
Officer
|
128,155(4)
|
*
|
Paul Sallwasser, Director
|
193,579(5)
|
*
|
Kevin Allodi, Director
|
143,145(6)
|
*
|
All
Current Executive Officers & Directors, as a group
(6 persons)
|
18,113,147
|
48.4%
|
|
|
|
Stockholders owning 5% or more
|
|
|
Carl
Grover
|
3,507,160(7)
|
9.99%
|
*less than 1%
(1)
|
Unless otherwise set forth below, the mailing address of Executive
Officers, Directors and 5% or greater holders is c/o Youngevity
International, Inc., 2400 Boswell Road, Chula Vista, California
91914.
|
(2)
|
Stephan Wallach, our Chief Executive Officer, owns 14,000,000
shares of common stock through joint ownership with his wife,
Michelle Wallach, with whom he shares voting and dispositive
control. Mr. Wallach also owns 2,811 shares and options to purchase
625,000 shares of common stock that are exercisable within
sixty (60) days of June 18,
2021 and are included in the
number of shares beneficially owned by him and Michelle Wallach
also owns options to purchase 625,000 shares of common stock that
are exercisable within sixty (60) days of June 18, 2021 and are included in the number of shares
beneficially owned by her. Stephan Wallach and Michelle Wallach
have pledged 1,500,000 shares of our common stock held by them to
secure the Credit Note under a Security Agreement, dated
December 13, 2018 with Carl Grover.
|
(3)
|
David Briskie, our President and Chief Financial Officer, owns
195,429 shares of common stock, and beneficially owns 100,028
shares of common stock owned by Brisk Investments, LP, 250,000
shares of common stock owned by Brisk Management, LLC. Mr. Briskie
also owns options to purchase 1,850,000 shares of common stocks
that are exercisable within sixty (60) days of June 18, 2021
and are included in the number of
shares beneficially owned by him. Does not include the remaining
unvested 200,000 restricted stock units issued to Mr. Briskie in
August 2017, of which each unit represents a contingent right to
receive one share of common stock, vesting as follows: (i) Year 3 -
25,000 shares (fully earned as of the valuation date); (ii) Year 4
– 37,500 shares; (iii) Year 5 - 125,000 shares; and (iv) Year
6 – 62,500 shares; provided that Mr. Briskie continues to
serve as an executive officer or otherwise is not terminated for
cause prior to such dates.
|
(4)
|
William Thompson is a director of the Company, owns options to
purchase an aggregate of 128,155 shares of common stock that are
exercisable within sixty (60) days June 18, 2021.
|
(5)
|
Paul Sallwasser is a director of the Company and owns 76,924 shares
of common stock, which includes 9,264 shares from the conversion of
his 2017 Notes to common stock and 14,673 from the exercise of his
2014 Warrant. Mr. Sallwasser also owns options to purchase an
aggregate of 116,655 shares of common stock that are exercisable
within sixty (60) days of June 18, 2021.
|
(6)
|
Kevin Allodi is a director of the Company and owns 13,888 shares of
common stock directly and 12,602 shares of common stock through
joint ownership with his wife, Nancy Larkin Allodi. Mr. Allodi also
owns options to purchase an aggregate of 116,655 shares of common
stock that are exercisable within sixty (60) days of June 18,
2021.
|
(7)
|
Shares ownership is based on information contained in a Schedule
13D/A filed with the SEC on March 12, 2020 and has been updated
through June 18, 2021 to reflect expired warrants. Carl Grover is
the sole beneficial owner of 3,507,160 shares of common stock. Mr.
Grover holds (i) 2,986,908 shares of the Issuer’s outstanding
common stock, and (ii) common stock purchase warrants to purchase
an aggregate of 1,131,579 shares of the Issuer’s common stock
(the “Warrants”), including (1) December 2018 note
warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $6.82 per share, (2) December 2018 note warrants to
purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$7.82 per share, and (3) the Exchange Warrant to purchase 631,579
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.75 per share.
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Warrants, each Warrant is not
exercisable into shares of common stock to the extent that the
issuance of common stock upon the exercise, after taking into
account the common stock then owned by the Mr. Grover, would result
in the beneficial ownership by Mr. Grover of more than 9.99% of the
outstanding common stock of the Company (the “Beneficial
Ownership Limitation”). Mr. Grover’s address is 1010 S.
Ocean Blvd., Apt. 1017, Pompano Beach, Florida 33062.
|
|
|
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,
and Director Independence.
The
following is a summary of transactions since January 1, 2018 to
which we have been a party in which the amount involved exceeded
$120,000 and in which any of our executive officers, directors or
beneficial holders of more than 5% of our capital stock have or
will have a direct or indirect interest, other than compensation
arrangements which are described in the sections of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K entitled Part III, Item 10 “Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance” and Item 11
“Executive Compensation.”
FDI Realty, LLC
FDI Realty, LLC (“FDI Realty”) was the owner and lessor
of the building previously partially occupied for its sales and
marketing office in Windham, NH until December 2015. One of our
former officers is the single member of FDI Realty.
At December 31, 2017 we believed we held a variable interest in FDI
Realty, for which we were not deemed to be the primary beneficiary.
We concluded, based on its qualitative consideration of the
terminated lease agreement, and the role of the single member of
FDI Realty, that the single member is the primary beneficiary of
FDI Realty. In making these determinations, we considered that the
single member conducts and manages the business of FDI Realty, is
authorized to borrow funds on behalf of FDI Realty, is the sole
person authorized and responsible for conducting the business of
FDI Realty and is obligated to fund the obligations of FDI Realty.
We believed we were a co-guarantor of FDI Realty’s mortgages
on the building, however, at December 31, 2017, we determined that
the fair value of the guarantees was not significant and therefore
did not record a related liability.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, we determined that based
on the current circumstances as it relates to certain agreements
existing among us and FDI Realty, including but not limited to an
amended and restated equity purchase agreement which was executed
in October 2011 and FDI Realty’s failure to meet its
obligations under the amended purchase agreement, we no longer
holds a variable interest in FDI Realty. (See Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements.)
2400 Boswell, LLC
2400 Boswell, LLC (“2400 Boswell”) is the owner and
lessor of the building occupied by us for our corporate office and
warehouse in Chula Vista, CA. As of December 31, 2012, an immediate
family member of a greater than 5% shareholder of us was the single
member of 2400 Boswell and the Company was a co-guarantor of the
2400 Boswell mortgage on the leased building. During 2013 we
acquired 2400 Boswell for $248,000 in cash, $334,000 of debt
forgiveness and accrued interest, and a promissory note of
approximately $393,000, payable in equal payments over 5 years and
bears interest at 5.00%. Additionally, we assumed a long-term
mortgage of $3,625,000, payable over 25 years. Interest is paid
monthly at the prime rate plus 2.50% and is adjusted by the lender
on the first calendar day of month. At December 31, 2019 and 2018,
the interest rate was 7.50% and 7.75%, respectively. As of December
31, 2019 and 2018, the balance on the long-term mortgage was
$3,143,000 and $3,217,000, respectively, the balance on the
promissory note was zero.
Richard Renton
Richard
Renton was a member of the board of directors until February 11,
2020 and owns and operates WVNP, Inc., a supplier of certain
inventory items sold by us. We made purchases of approximately
$228,000 and $151,000 from WVNP Inc., for the years ended December
31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. In addition, Mr. Renton is a
distributor of ours and was paid distributor commissions for the
years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 of approximately $366,000
and $363,000, respectively.
JJL Equipment Holding, LLC
In connection with the acquisition of Khrysos Global, we held a
deposit of $233,000 on December 31, 2019 from JJL Equipment
Holding, LLC (“JJL Equipment”) for an equipment
purchase. Temple Leigh Dundore, a member of the Khrysos
Representing Party and wife of Dwayne Dundore, who was the
President of KII through September 2020, is a member and part owner
of JJL Equipment. The deposit is to be applied to future machinery
and equipment orders from JJL Equipment and is recorded in other
current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December
31, 2019.
Carl Grover
Carl Grover was the sole beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of our
outstanding common shares and beneficial owner of 3,293,643 shares
of common stock at December 31, 2019.
In July
2019, Mr. Grover acquired 600,242 shares of common stock upon the
partial exercise at $4.60 per share of a 2014 warrant to purchase
782,608 shares of common stock held by him. In connection with such
exercise, we received approximately $2,761,000 from Mr. Grover,
issued to Mr. Grover 50,000 shares of restricted common stock as an
inducement fee and agreed to extend the expiration date of the July
2014 warrant held by him to December 15, 2020, and the exercise
price of the warrant was adjusted to $4.75 with respect to 182,366
shares of common stock remaining for exercise
thereunder.
In December 2018, CLR entered into a credit agreement with Mr.
Grover pursuant to which CLR borrowed $5,000,000 from Mr. Grover
and in exchange issued to him a $5,000,000 credit note. In
addition, Siles, as guarantor, executed a separate Guaranty
Agreement (“Guaranty”). In connection with the
credit agreement, the Company issued
to Mr. Grover a four-year warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of its
common stock, exercisable at $6.82 per share, and a four-year
warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at
$7.82 per share, pursuant to a warrant purchase agreement with Mr.
Grover. At December 31, 2019, the balance of the borrowing from the
credit agreement with Mr. Grover was approximately $4,085,000, net
of debt discounts. (See Note 6)
Mr. Grover held the following warrants exercisable into an
aggregate of 2,248,975 shares of common stock at December 31, 2019:
(i) a 2014 warrant exercisable for 182,366 shares of common stock, (ii) a 2015 warrant
exercisable for 200,000 shares of common stock, (iii) three 2017
warrants exercisable for an aggregate of 735,030 shares of common
stock, (iv) a 2018 warrant exercisable for 631,579 shares of common
stock, and (v) two 2018 warrants exercisable for an aggregate of
500,000 shares of common stock.
In addition, Mr. Grover owned 2,986,908 shares of common stock at
December 31, 2019 which included: (i) 1,122,233 shares issued from
the conversion of his 2017 PIPE Notes to common stock, (ii) 428,571
shares issued from the conversion of his 2015 Note to common stock,
(iii) 747,664 shares issued from the conversion of his 2014 PIPE
Notes to common stock, (iv) 650,242 shares from the partial
exercise and inducement shares issued with the exercise of the 2014
warrants, and (v) 38,198 shares of common stock.
Paul Sallwasser
As of December 31, 2019, Mr. Paul Sallwasser was a member of the
board of directors and prior to joining our board of directors
he acquired a 2014 Note issued in our private placement consummated
in 2014 in the principal amount of $75,000 convertible into 10,714
shares of common stock and a warrant (the “2014
Warrant”) issued, in the 2014 private placement, exercisable
for 14,673 shares of common stock. Prior to joining our Board of
directors, Mr. Sallwasser acquired in the 2017 private placement a
2017 Note in the principal amount of approximately $38,000
convertible into 8,177 shares of common stock and a warrant (the
“2017 Warrant”) issued, in the 2017 private placement,
exercisable for 5,719 shares of common stock. Mr. Sallwasser also
acquired in the 2017 private placement in exchange for the
“2015 Note” that he acquired in our private placement
consummated in 2015, a 2017 Note in the principal amount of $5,000
convertible into 1,087 shares of common stock and a 2017 Warrant
exercisable for 543 shares of common stock.
In March 2018, we completed our Series B Offering, and in
accordance with the terms of the 2017 Notes, Mr. Sallwasser’s
2017 Notes converted to 9,264 shares of common stock.
In
August 2019, Mr. Sallwasser acquired 14,673 shares of our common
stock upon the exercise at $4.60 per share of his 2014 Warrant held
by him. In connection with such exercise, Mr. Sallwasser applied
$67,495 of the proceeds of his $75,000 2014 Note due to him us as
consideration for the warrant exercise. The warrant exercise
proceeds to us would have been $67,495. We paid the balance owed to
him under his 2014 Note of $8,260 in cash, which amount include
accrued interest of the 2014 Note.
Daniel J. Mangless
Daniel J. Mangless, was a beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of
the outstanding shares of our common stock due to his beneficial
ownership of 1,780,000 shares of common stock at December 31, 2019
which includes 63,000 shares of common stock issued from the
conversion of his Series C convertible preferred stock to common
stock, and 63,000 shares of common stock issued from the exercise
of his December 2018 warrant, 250,000 shares of common stock issued
from his February 2019 securities purchase agreement, 250,000
shares of common stock issued from his June 2019 securities
purchase agreement, and 904,000 shares of common stock held by him
at December 31, 2019. Mr. Mangless also owns a February 2019
warrant exercisable for 250,000 shares of common stock which he
acquired in connection with a February 2019 securities purchase
agreement. During 2021, Mr. Mangless liquated some of his
Youngevity common stock and is no longer a beneficial owner of in
excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of common
stock.
In February 2019, we entered into a securities purchase agreement
with Mr. Mangless pursuant to which we sold 250,000 shares of our
common stock at an offering price of $7.00 per share. Pursuant to
the purchase agreement, we also issued Mr. Mangless a three-year
warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $7.00. We received proceeds of $1,750,000 from the stock
offering. (See Note 10 to the
consolidated financial statements.)
In June 2019, we entered into a second securities purchase
agreement with Mr. Mangless pursuant to which we sold 250,000
shares of common stock at an offering price of $5.50 per share. We
received proceeds of $1,375,000 from the stock offering.
(See Note 10 to the consolidated
financial statements.)
In March 2020, we entered into an agreement with Ivan
Gandrud Chevrolet, Inc. (“IGC”), pursuant to which IGC agreed to provide consulting
services for our commercial hemp segment in exchange for 125,000
shares of restricted common stock which were issued as fully
earned. The fair value of the shares issued was approximately
$158,000. In addition, we issued a five-year warrant
exercisable for 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise
price of $4.75. The warrant was deemed fully earned. IGC is
100% owned by Mr. Mangless.
In March 2020, CLR entered into a senior secured promissory note
and securities purchase agreement with Mr. Mangless related to our
March 2020 private placement offering pursuant to which we issued a
note in the principal amount of $1,000,000 due December 31, 2020
(the “Mangless Note”) and bearing interest at 18.00%
per annum. Mr. Mangless received 50,000 shares of our common stock
in connection with his investment. (See Note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements.)
On
December 31, 2020, CLR defaulted on the settlement of the Mangless
Note. On April 13, 2021, the CLR entered into a Settlement
Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”), effective as of
April 2, 2021, by and among the Company, CLR, and Mr. Mangless to
settle all claims related to a lawsuit filed by Mr. Mangless
against the Company and CLR, on February 10, 2021, for the alleged
breach by the Company and CLR of their obligations under the
Mangless Note and the Mangless Pledge and Security Agreement (See
Mangless v. Youngevity
International, Inc. and CLR Roasters LLC, Case No. 2021-CA-996-O
(Fla. Cir. Ct.)) (the “Lawsuit”). Pursuant to
the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Mangless has agreed to dismiss the
Lawsuit, with prejudice within five days of the Company making all
of payments required under the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement
Agreement provides that the Company shall make a $195,000 payment
to Mr. Mangless no later than April 10, 2021 and make a $101,668
payment to Mr. Mangless beginning on May 1, 2021, and on the first
day of every month thereafter through and including January 1,
2022, inclusive. In addition, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement,
we have agreed to issue Mr. Mangless 1,000,000 shares of our common
stock (the “Settlement Shares”) and that following the
date the Company has completed the audit of its financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2020, if it is
then necessary to register the Settlement Shares with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to allow
Mr. Mangless to resell the Settlement Shares in the open market, to
file a registration statement on Form S-1 within 60 days after
bringing its audit filings up to date.
Other Related Party Transactions
Hernandez, Hernandez Export Y Compania Limitada and H&H Coffee
Group Export Corp.
Our commercial coffee segment CLR, is associated with Hernandez,
Hernandez, Export Y Company (“H&H”), a Nicaragua
company, through sourcing arrangements to procure Nicaraguan grown
green coffee beans. As part of the 2014 Siles acquisition, CLR
engaged the owners of H&H, Alain Piedra Hernandez (“Mr.
Hernandez”) and Marisol Del Carmen Siles Orozco (“Ms.
Orozco”), as employees to manage Siles.
H&H is a sourcing agent that purchases raw green coffee beans
from the local producers in Nicaragua and supplies CLR’s mill
with unprocessed green coffee for processing. CLR does not have a
direct relationship with the local producers and is dependent on
H&H to negotiate agreements with local producers for the supply
and to provide to CLR’s mill raw unprocessed green coffee to
CLR in a timely and efficient manner. In addition, CLR’s
largest customer for green coffee beans during the year ended
December 31, 2019 was H&H Export. In consideration for
H&H's sourcing of green coffee for processing within
CLR’s mill, CLR and H&H share in the green coffee profit
from milling operations.
CLR made purchases from H&H Export of approximately $9,891,000
of unprocessed green coffee for the year ended December 31, 2018,
for use in selling processed green coffee to other third parties
and for use in CLR’s Miami roasting facilities. CLR did not
have any purchases of unprocessed green coffee from H&H Export
during the year ended December 31, 2019.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, CLR recorded net revenues
from green coffee milling and processing services of approximately
$6,416,000 and during the year ended December 31, 2018 processed
green coffee beans and recorded revenues of approximately
$3,938,000, to H&H Export. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, CLR's
accounts receivable balance for customer related revenue by H&H
Export were approximately $8,707,000 and $673,000, respectively, of
which the full amount was past due at December 31, 2019. As a
result, we have reserved $7,871,000 as bad debt related to this
account receivable, which is net of collections through December
31, 2020. (See Note 11 to the consolidated financial
statements.)
On March 6, 2020, CLR entered into a Finance, Security and ARAP
Monetization Agreement (the “Agreement”)
with H&H Export and H&H (collectively,
“H&H”). H&H is the agent for the independent
green coffee growers from which CLR purchases its unprocessed
coffee beans and H&H also purchases processed coffee beans from
CLR that it sells to third parties. The owners of H&H receive a
percentage of profit derived from green coffee sales processed in
Nicaragua. Pursuant to the Agreement, H&H has agreed to allow a
Nicaraguan agency (the “Agency”), to advance on behalf
of H&H, approximately $22,000,000 of the $30,100,000 of
accounts receivable owed by H&H to CLR for its purchase of
processed green coffee during the 2019 season. The Agency has also
entered into a $46,500,000 credit facility with H&H to provide
funding for H&H’s future coffee purchases of unprocessed
green coffee from independent producers. Of the 2020 sales amounts
to be billed by CLR for future coffee purchases of processed
coffee, CLR will be paid an additional amount, at a rate of $.225
per pound of processed green coffee shipped to customers, to be
applied to the remaining outstanding 2019 accounts receivable
balance owed by H&H to CLR. Until such time as the entire
accounts receivable balance is paid in full, H&H has agreed not
take any profit interest. However, given the COVID crisis’
impact on the 2020 growing season and the continued delay in full
payment of the 2019 receivable balances, management considers the
H&H receivable impaired at December 31, 2019. Subsequent to the
Agreement, CLR adopted the recognition of recording revenues at net
for sales between CLR and H&H.
In December 2018, CLR advanced $5,000,000 to H&H Export to
provide services in support of a five-year contract for the sale
and processing of 41 million pounds of green coffee beans on an
annual basis. The services include providing hedging and financing
opportunities to producers and delivering harvested coffee to the
Company’s mills. In March 2019, this advance was
converted to a $5,000,000 loan agreement as a note receivable and
bears interest at 9.00% per annum and is due and payable by H&H
Export at the end of each year’s harvest season, but no later
than October 31 for any harvest year. In October 2019, CLR and
H&H Export amended the March 2019 agreement in terms of the
maturity date such that all outstanding principal and interest is
due and payable at the end of the 2020 harvest (or when the 2020
season’s harvest was exported and collected), but never to be
later than November 30, 2020. The loan is secured by H&H
Export’s hedging account with INTL FC Stone, accounts
receivables, green coffee inventory in the possession of H&H
Export and all green coffee contracts. At December 31, 2019, the
note receivable including accrued interest was $5,340,000.
Management has reviewed the security against the loan and the
impact of the underlying COVID crisis and has determined that the
net amount of the note receivable for $5,340,000, was not collected
as of December 31, 2020, and therefore approximately $5,340,000 has
been recognized as an allowance for collectability at the end of
December 31, 2019.
Mill Construction Agreement between CLR and H&H
In January 2019, to accommodate CLR’s green coffee purchase
contract, CLR entered into a mill construction agreement with
H&H and H&H Export, Mr. Hernandez and Ms. Orozco, together
with H&H, collectively referred to as (the “Nicaraguan
Partner”), pursuant to which the Nicaraguan Partner agreed to
transfer a 45-acre tract of land in Matagalpa, Nicaragua (the
“Matagalpa Property”) to be owned 50% by the Nicaraguan
Partner and 50% by CLR. In consideration for the land acquisition
the Company issued to H&H Export, 153,846 shares of common
stock. The fair value of the shares issued was $1,200,000 and was
based on the stock price on the date of issuance of the shares. In
addition, the Nicaraguan Partner and CLR agreed to contribute
$4,700,000 each toward construction of a processing plant, office,
and storage facilities on the Matagalpa property (collectively the
“Matagalpa Mill”) for processing coffee in Nicaragua.
The addition of the mill will accommodate CLR’s green coffee
contract commitments. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and
2018, CLR made payments of $2,150,000 and $900,000, respectively,
towards the Matagalpa Mill project. At December 31, 2019, CLR
contributed a total of $3,050,000 towards the Matagalpa Mill
project, in addition $391,117 was paid for operating equipment
which is included in construction in process within property and
equipment, net on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. At
December 31, 2019, the Nicaraguan Partner contributed a total of
$1,922,000 towards the Matagalpa Mill project. CLR’s
remaining portion of $1,650,000 was paid during 2020, including an
additional $912,606 for operating equipment. At December 31, 2019,
the Matagalpa mill was in construction and was not ready for full
operations.
During 2019, we issued 295,910 shares of our common stock to
H&H Export to pay for certain working capital, construction and
other payables. In connection with the issuance, we over issued
121,649 shares of common stock, resulting in the net issuance of
common stock to settle payables 174,261 shares. H&H Export
agreed to reimburse CLR for the over issuance of the 121,649 shares
of common stock in cash. At December 31, 2019, the value of the
shares was approximately $397,000 based on the stock price at
December 31, 2019. Management has reviewed the amount due and in
conjunction with the impact of the underlying COVID crisis and has
determined that the receivable balance of $397,000, was more than
likely to be uncollected as of December 31, 2019, and therefore the
full amount was recognized as an allowance for collectability at
the end of December 31, 2019.
Amendment to Operating and Profit-Sharing Agreement between CLR and
H&H
In
January 2019, CLR entered into an amendment to the March 2014
operating and profit-sharing agreement with the owners of H&H.
In addition, CLR and H&H, Mr. Hernandez and Ms. Orozco
restructured their profit-sharing agreement in regard to profits
from green coffee sales and processing that increased CLR’s
profit participation by an additional 25%. Under the new terms of
the agreement with respect to profit generated from green coffee
sales and processed from La Pita, a leased mill, or the Matagalpa
Mill. now will provide for a split of profits of 75% to CLR and 25%
to the Nicaraguan Partner, after certain conditions are
met.
In addition, in January 2019 H&H Export has sold to CLR its
espresso brand Café Cachita in consideration of the issuance
of 100,000 shares of common stock. The shares of common stock
issued were valued at $7.50 per share. Profit-sharing expense for
the year ended December 31, 2019 was $1,060,000
compared to a profit-sharing benefit of $910,000 in the same period
last year, which is included in accrued expenses on the
Company’s balance sheets.
Joint Venture Agreement in Nicaragua for Hemp Processing Center
between the CLR and KII and Nicaraguan partner
On April 20 and July 29, 2020, CLR and KII (the U.S.
Partners) entered into agreements (“Hemp Joint Venture
Agreement”) with H&H Export and Fitracomex, Inc. (“Fitracomex”)
(collectively “The Nicaraguan Partners”) and
established the hemp joint venture (the “Nicaraguan Hemp Grow
and Extractions Group” or the “Hemp Joint
Venture”).
The
agreement calls for H&H Export to contribute the 2,200-acre
Chaguitillo Farms in Sebaco-Matagalpa, Nicaragua which will be
owned by H&H Export and the U.S. Partners on a 50/50 basis
separate from the Hemp Joint Venture.
The
agreement calls for Nicaraguan Partners to contribute the
excavation and preparation for hemp growth of the 2,200 acres,
installation of electrical service, and the construction of 45,000
square feet of buildings to be used for office, processing,
storage, drying and green house space.
The
U.S. Partners will contribute all the necessary extraction
equipment to convert hemp to crude oil and will also provide the
feminized hemp seeds for the pilot grow program, along with their expertise in the hemp
business. The U.S. Partners will also provide all necessary
working capital as required.
Additionally,
we agreed, subject to the approval of The Nasdaq Stock Market
(“Nasdaq”) to issue 1,500,000 shares of our restricted
common stock, $0.001 par value, to Fitracomex. In accordance with
the Hemp Joint Venture Agreement, in July 2020 we issued to
Fitracomex the agreed upon shares of restricted common stock.
We also agreed to issue warrants to Fitracomex for the purchase
5,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of US
$1.50, exercisable for a term of five (5) years after completion of
the construction and upon the approval by our stockholders of the
proposed issuance. In addition, we agreed to use our best
efforts to register the resale of the shares of our common stock
issued to Fitracomex under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Securities Act"), and make any necessary applications
with Nasdaq to list the shares.
The
U.S. Partners and H&H Export will serve as the managing
partners with all business decisions will require prior consent and
agreement of both parties. The Net Profits and Net Losses for each
fiscal period shall be allocated among the partners as follows:
twenty five percent (25%) to the Nicaraguan Partners and seventy
five percent (75%) to the U.S. Partners.
Master Relationship Agreement
In March 2021, CLR entered into a Master Relationship Agreement
(“MA Agreement”) with the owners of H&H in order to
memorialize the various agreements and modifications to those
agreements. Additionally, certain events have occurred that have
kept the parties from complying with the terms of each of the
original agreements and have caused there to be an imbalance with
the respect to the funds owed by one party to the other; therefore
this MA Agreement also sets forth a detailed accounting of the
different business relationships and reconciles the monetary
obligations between each party through the end of fiscal year
2020.
This MA Agreement memorialized the key settlement terms and
established that H&H owes CLR approximately $10,700,000,
described as “H&H Coffee Liability”, that is
composed of:
●
past due accounts
receivable owed to CLR from H&H for 2019 and 2020;
●
the $5,000,000 note
due plus accrued interest on the note;
●
CLR lost profits in
2019 and 2020;
●
the return of
working capital provided by CLR for the 2019 and 2020 green coffee
program.
The
agreement also includes an offset against amounts owed by H&H
to CLR consisting of:
●
H&H’s 25%
profit sharing participation for 2019 and 2020;
●
and an offset of
H&H’s open payables owed by CLR to H&H in the amount
of approximately $243,000.
The MA
Agreement provides that approximately $10,700,000 is owed to CLR by
H&H and H&H agrees to satisfy this obligation by providing
CLR a minimum of 20 containers of strictly high grown coffee
(approximately 825,000 pounds of coffee) per month, commencing at
the end of March 2021 and continuing monthly until the aforesaid
amount is paid in full. The MA Agreement stipulates that the
parties have agreed that the coffee to be provided to CLR by
H&H for the shipments described above, that in order to satisfy
H&H’s debt to CLR, shall not be produced on any
plantation that the parties have a joint interest in. CLR has
recorded allowances of $7,871,000 related to the H&H trade
accounts receivable $5,340,000 related to the H&H notes
receivable during the year ended December 31, 2019 due to
H&H’s repayment history and risks associated with
redemption of the receivable in coffee.
Other Agreement between CLR & H&H
In May 2017, CLR entered a settlement agreement, as amended, with
Mr. Hernandez who was issued a warrant for the purchase of 75,000
shares of our common stock at a price of $2.00 with an expiration
date of three years, in lieu of an obligation due from CLR to
H&H as relates to a sourcing and supply agreement with H&H
and H&H Export. The warrants were outstanding at both December
31, 2019 and 2018.
Compensation of Our Current Directors and Executive
Officers
For information with respect to the compensation offered to our
current directors and executive officers, please see the
descriptions under the heading “Executive and Director
Compensation” of this Annual Report.
Related Party Transaction Policy and Procedures
Pursuant to our Related Party Transaction and
Procedures, our executive officers, directors, and principal
stockholders, including their immediate family members and
affiliates, are prohibited from entering into a related party
transaction with us without the prior consent of our audit
committee or our independent directors. Any request for us to enter
into a transaction with an executive officer, director, principal
stockholder, or any of such persons’ immediate family members
or affiliates, must first be presented to our audit committee for
review, consideration and approval. The request shall
include a description of the transaction and the aggregate dollar
amount. In determining whether to approve, ratify, disapprove or
reject a related party transaction, the audit committee, shall
take into account, among other factors it deems appropriate,
whether the related party transaction is entered into on terms no
less favorable to the Company than terms generally available to an
unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances;
the results of an appraisal, if any; whether there was a bidding
process and the results thereof; review of the valuation
methodology used and alternative approaches to valuation of the
transaction; and the extent of the related person’s interest
in the transaction. Our audit
committee approves only those agreements that, in light of known
circumstances, are in, or are not inconsistent with, our best
interests, as our audit committee determines in the good faith
exercise of its discretion.
Item 14. Principal Accountant
Fees and Services.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fee
Summary
The following table provides information regarding the fees billed
to us by Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. for the year ended December 31,
2018, and fees billed to us by MaloneBailey, LLP for the year ended
December 31, 2019. All fees described below were approved by the
Board or the audit committee:
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Audit Fees and Expenses (1)
|
$675,000
|
$805,000
|
Audit Related Fees
|
-
|
-
|
All
Other Fees
|
-
|
-
|
|
$675,000
|
$805,000
|
(1)
|
Audit
fees and expenses were for professional services rendered for the
audit and reviews of the consolidated financial statements of the
Company, professional services rendered for issuance of consents
and assistance with review of documents filed with the
SEC.
|
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence,
the audit committee has responsibility for appointing, setting
compensation and overseeing the work of the independent registered
public accounting firm. In recognition of this responsibility, the
audit committee has established a policy to pre-approve all audit
and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent
registered public accounting firm.
Prior to the engagement of the independent registered public
accounting firm for the next year’s audit, management will
submit a list of services and related fees expected to be rendered
during that year for audit services, audit-related services, tax
services and other fees to the audit committee for
approval.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement
Schedules
(a)
The
following documents have been filed as part of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K:
1.
Consolidated
Financial Statements of Youngevity International, Inc.: The
information required by this item is included in Item 8 of Part II
of this Annual Report.
2.
Financial
Statement Schedules: Financial statement schedules required under
the related instructions are not applicable for the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018 and have therefore been
omitted.
3.
The exhibits listed in the accompanying index to exhibits are filed
as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
Not applicable
EXHIBIT INDEX
The
following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report pursuant
to Item 601 of Regulation S-K:
Exhibit No.
|
|
Title of Document
|
|
Form of
Selling Agent Agreement (Incorporated by reference to the
Company’s Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1, File No. 333-221847,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 23,
2018)
|
|
|
Form of
Selling Agent Agreement (Amendment) (Incorporated by reference to
the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1, File No.
333-221847, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 23, 2018)
|
|
|
Form of
Selling Agency Agreement between Youngevity International, Inc. and
Tripoint Global Equities, LLC (Incorporated by reference to the
Company’s Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1, File No. 333-221847,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7,
2018)
|
|
|
At-The-Market
Offering Agreement dated January 7, 2019 by and between Youngevity
International, Inc. and The Benchmark Company, LLC (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 7,
2019, File No. 001-38116).
|
|
|
Underwriting
Agreement, dated September 19, 2019, by and between Youngevity
International, Inc. and The Benchmark Company, LLC, as
representative of the several underwriters named therein
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-54900, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 24,
2019)
|
|
|
Underwriting
Agreement, dated December 17, 2019, by and between Youngevity
International, Inc. and The Benchmark Company, LLC, as
representative of the several underwriters named therein
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-54900, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19,
2019)
|
|
|
Certificate
of Incorporation Dated July 15, 2011 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-12G, File No. 000-54900,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2013)
|
|
|
Bylaws
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s
Form 10-12G, File No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 12, 2013)
|
|
|
Certificate
of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation dated June 5, 2017
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-54900, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7, 2017)
|
|
|
Certificate
of Designations for Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 8, 2018)
|
|
|
Certificate
of Correction to Certificate of Designation of Powers, Preferences
and Rights of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 16, 2018)
|
|
Certificate
of Designations for Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 21, 2018)
|
|
Certificate
of Increase to the Certificate of Designation of Powers,
Preferences and Rights of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2018)
|
|
|
Certificate
of Designations, Rights and Preferences of the 9.75% Series D
Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 24, 2019)
|
|
|
Certificate
of Increase to the Certificate of Designations, Rights and
Preferences of the 9.75%Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual
Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K,File No. 000-54900,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19,
2019)
|
|
|
Specimen
Common Stock certificate (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-12G, File No. 000-54900,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2013)
|
|
|
Stock
Option issued to Stephan Wallach (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 1012G, File No.
000-54900, Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 12, 2013)
|
|
|
Stock
Option issued to Michelle Wallach (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Form 10-12G, File No.
000-54900, Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 12, 2013)
|
|
|
Stock
Option issued to David Briskie (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Form 10-12G, File No. 000-54900,
Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2013)
|
|
|
Stock
Option issued to Richard Renton (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.6 the Company’s Form 10-12G, File No. 000-54900,
Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2013)
|
|
|
Form of
Note Purchase Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 5, 2014)
|
|
|
Form of
Secured Convertible Notes (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 5, 2014)
|
|
|
Form of
Series A Warrants (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 5, 2014)
|
|
|
Form of
Registration Rights Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 5, 2014)
|
|
|
Form of
Note Purchase Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 7, 2015)
|
|
|
Form of
Secured Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-54900,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 7,
2015)
|
|
|
Form of
Note Purchase Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 16, 2015)
|
|
|
Form of
Secured Convertible Note (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 16, 2015)
|
|
Form of
Series A Warrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 16, 2015)
|
|
|
Form of
Notice of Award of Restricted Stock Units (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form S-8
Registration Statement, File No. 333-219027 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2017)
|
|
|
Form of
Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form S-8
Registration Statement, File No. 333-219027 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2017)
|
|
|
Form of
Note Purchase Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 3, 2017)
|
|
|
Form of
Convertible Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-38116, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 3, 2017)
|
|
|
Form of
Series D Warrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-38116, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 3, 2017)
|
|
Form of
Selling Agent’s Warrant (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.23 to the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1,
File No. 333-221847, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 23, 2018)
|
|
|
Form of
First Amendment to Series D Warrant Agreement (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on January 23, 2018)
|
|
|
Form of
Senior Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.27 to
the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No.
333-225053 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May
18, 2018)
|
|
|
Form of
Subordinated Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.28
to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No.
333-225053 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May
18, 2018)
|
|
|
Form of
Warrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.29 to the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No.
333-225053 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May
18, 2018)
|
|
|
Form of
Warrant Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.30
to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No.
333-225053 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May
18, 2018)
|
|
|
Form of
Unit Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.21 to
the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No.
333-225053 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May
18, 2018)
|
|
|
Form of
Warrant Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 7, 2018 (File No.
001-38116)
|
|
|
Form of
Warrant Agreement with Carl Grover (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on October 29, 2018)
|
|
|
Form of
$5.35 Warrant Agreement with Ascendant Alternative Strategies, LLC
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29,
2018)
|
|
|
Form of
$4.75 Warrant Agreement with Ascendant Alternative Strategies, LLC
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29,
2018)
|
|
Warrant,
dated December 13, 2018, issued to Carl Grover (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 19, 2018)
|
|
Warrant,
dated December 13, 2018, issued to Carl Grover (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 19, 2018)
|
|
|
Warrant,
dated December 13, 2018, issued to Ascendant Alternative
Strategies, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19,
2018)
|
|
|
Form of
Investor Warrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-38116, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 12, 2019)
|
|
|
Form of
Contingent Warrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-38116, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 12, 2019)
|
|
|
Form of
Contingent Warrant #2 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-38116, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 12, 2019)
|
|
|
Form of
6% Convertible Notes (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-38116, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 15, 2019)
|
|
|
Form of
8% Secured Promissory Note dated March 18, 2019 by and between
Youngevity International, Inc. and certain investors.
*
|
|
|
Warrant
Purchase Agreement, dated December 13, 2018, between Youngevity
International, Inc. and Carl Grover (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.39 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, File 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 15, 2019)
|
|
|
Description
of Capital Securities as of December 31, 2019 of Youngevity
International, Inc. *
|
|
|
18%
Senior Secured Promissory Note, dated March 20, 2020 issued by
Youngevity International, Inc. in favor of Daniel Mangless
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2020 (File No.
001-38116))
|
|
|
Purchase
Agreement with M2C Global, Inc. dated March 9, 2007 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form
10-12G, File No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 12, 2013)
|
|
|
First
Amendment to Purchase Agreement with M2C Global, Inc. dated
September 7, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Company’s Form 10-12G, File No. 000-54900, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2013)
|
|
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement with MLM Holdings, Inc. dated June 10, 2010
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Company’s Form 10-12G, File No. 000-54900, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2013)
|
|
|
Agreement
of Purchase and Sale with Price Plus, Inc. dated September 21, 2010
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Company’s Form 10-12G, File No. 000-54900, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive
License/Marketing Agreement with GLIE, LLC dba True2Life dated
March 20, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13
to the Company’s Form 10-12G, File No. 000-54900, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-12G, File No. 000-54900, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2013)
|
|
Form of
Stock Option (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
the Company’s Form 10-12G, File No. 000-54900, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2013)
|
|
|
Lease
with 2400 Boswell LLC dated May 1, 2001 (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Form 10-12G, File
No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 12, 2013)
|
|
|
Promissory
Note with Plaza Bank dated March 14, 2013 (incorporated herein by
reference to the Company’s Form 10-12G, File No. 000-54900,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2013)
|
|
|
Form of
Security Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 5, 2014)
|
|
Guaranty
Agreement made by Stephan Wallach (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
File No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 5, 2014)
|
|
|
Form of
Security Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 7, 2015)
|
|
|
Guaranty
Agreement made by Stephan Wallach (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
File No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 7, 2015)
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (Previously filed with the
Company’s Definitive Information Statement on Schedule 14C
File No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 21, 2017)
|
|
|
Form of
Stock Option (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 000-54900,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2017)
|
|
|
Third
Amendment with Crestmark Bank dated May 1, 2016 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K, File No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2017)
|
|
|
Form of
Subscription Agreement (BANQ and other subscribers) (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, File No. 333-221847, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7,
2018)
|
|
|
Form of
Registration Rights Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-38116, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 3, 2017)
|
|
|
Form of
Subscription Agreement (Folio subscribers) (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Company’s Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1, File No. 333-221847, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 7, 2018)
|
|
|
Loan
and Security Agreement with Crestmark Bank and related schedules
dated November 16, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.43 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K,
File No. 000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2018)
|
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the Loan and Security Agreement with Crestmark Bank, dated
December 29, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.44 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No.
000-54900, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 30, 2018)
|
|
|
Form of
Securities Purchase Agreement between Youngevity International,
Inc. and Investor (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 7, 2018 (File No.
001-38116))
|
|
|
Form of
Registration Rights Agreement between Youngevity International,
Inc. and Investor (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 7, 2018 (File No.
001-38116)
|
|
Exchange
Agreement between the Company and Carl Grover dated October 23,
2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29,
2018)
|
|
|
Advisory
Agreement between the Company and Corinthian Partners LLC dated
October 23, 2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-38116, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 29, 2018)
|
|
|
Credit
Agreement, dated December 13, 2018, by and among CLR Roasters, LLC,
Siles Family Plantation Group, S.A. and Carl Grover (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on December 19, 2018)
|
|
|
Security
Agreement, dated December 13, 2018, by and among CLR Roasters, LLC,
Siles Family Plantation Group, S.A. and Carl Grover (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on December 19, 2018)
|
|
Guaranty,
dated December 13, 2018, executed by Siles Family Plantation Group,
S.A. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19,
2018)
|
|
Security
Agreement, dated December 13, 2018, by and among Stephan Wallach,
Michelle Wallach and Carl Grover (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 19, 2018)
|
|
|
Warrant
Purchase Agreement, dated December 13, 2018, between Youngevity
International, Inc. and Carl Grover (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 19, 2018)
|
|
|
Exclusive
Agreement with Icelandic Water Holdings hf., dated January 10, 2019
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 11,
2019)
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated 2012 Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on January 11, 2019)
|
|
|
CLR
Siles Mill Construction Agreement date January 15, 2019
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 18,
2019)
|
|
|
Amendment
to the March 2014 Operating and Profit-Sharing Agreement between
Hernandez, Hernandez, Export Y Company and CLR Roasters, LLC dated
January 15, 2019.*
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated February 6, 2019, with Daniel Mangless
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2019)
|
|
|
Asset
and Equity Purchase Agreement by and between Youngevity
International, Inc., Khrysos Industries, Inc., Khrysos Global,
Inc., INX Holdings, LLC, Leigh Dundore and Dwayne Dundore
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2019)
|
|
|
Form of
Subscription Agreement to purchase 6% Convertible Notes
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 15,
2019)
|
|
Security
Agreement between Youngevity International, Inc. and investors
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 15,
2019)
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated June 17, 2019 by and between Youngevity
International, Inc. and certain investors.*
|
|
|
Letter
Agreement with Carl Grover, dated July 29, 2019 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 5, 2019)
|
|
|
Finance,
Security and AR AP Monetization Agreement, dated March 6, 2020 by
and between H&H Coffee Group Export Corp, H&H Export Y CIA.
LTDA. and CLR Roasters, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2020
(File No. 000-38116)).
|
|
|
Amendment
One to Loan Agreement Loan Agreement dated March 31, 2019, by and
between CLR Roasters, Inc., and H&H Coffee Group Export Corp.,
dated October 31, 2019 and Loan Agreement dated March 31, 2019, by
and between CLR Roasters, Inc., and H&H Coffee Group Export
Corp.*
|
|
10.43 |
|
18%
Senior Secured Promissory Note, dated March 20, 2020, with Daniel
Mangless (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26,
2020)
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, by and between Youngevity International, Inc.
and Daniel Mangless, dated March 20, 2020, (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2020)
|
|
|
Pledge
and Security Agreement, by and between Youngevity International,
Inc. and Daniel Mangless, dated March 20, 2020, (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2] to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2020)
|
|
|
Joint
Venture Agreement, dated April 20, 2020, by and among CLR Roasters,
LLC, Khrysos Industries, Inc., H&H Coffee Group Export Corp.
and P&S Corporation Trading Investments Inc. d/b/a: The Nica
Hemp Cooperative (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
001-38116, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 5, 2020)
|
|
|
Amendment
to Joint Venture Agreement, dated July 29, 2020, by and among CLR
Roasters, LLC, Khrysos Industries, Inc., H&H Coffee Group
Export Corp. and Fitracomex, Inc., as successor in interest to
P&S Corporation Trading Investments Inc. d/b/a: The Nica Hemp
Cooperative (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-38116,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5,
2020)
|
|
|
Master
Relationship Agreement, dated March 2, 2021, by and among CLR
Roasters, LLC, Hernandez, Hernandez Export Y Compania Limitida,
H&H Coffee Group Export Corp., Alain Piedra Hernandez, Marisol
Del Carmen Siles Orozco. *
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
of Youngevity International, Inc. *
|
|
|
Consent
of Consent of
MaloneBailey, LLP *
|
|
|
Consent of Mayer Hoffman
McCann P.C. *
|
|
|
Certification
of Stephan Wallach, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) *
|
|
|
Certification
of William Thompson, Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)*
|
|
|
Certification
of Stephan Wallach, Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
|
*
|
Filed
herewith
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
YOUNGEVITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|
|
|
|
June 24, 2021
|
By:
|
/s/ Stephan Wallach
|
|
|
Stephan Wallach,
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stephan Wallach
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman
|
June 24,
2021
|
Stephan Wallach
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William Thompson
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
June 24,
2021
|
William Thompson
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David Briskie
|
President,
Chief Investment Officer and Director
|
June 24,
2021
|
David Briskie
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kevin Allodi
|
Director
|
June 24,
2021
|
Kevin Allodi
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel Dorsey
|
Director
|
June 24,
2021
|
Daniel Dorsey
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paul Sallwasser
|
Director
|
June 24,
2021
|
Paul Sallwasser
|
|
|
- 90 -