Yuma Energy, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2018 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2018
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period
from to
Commission File Number: 001-37932
Yuma Energy, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
|
|
94-0787340
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
1177 West Loop South, Suite 1825
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
|
|
77027
(Zip Code)
|
|
|
(713) 968-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area
code)
|
|
|
|
|
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed
since last report)
|
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting
company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☒
|
|
|
Emerging
growth company
|
☐
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐ No ☒
At
August 9, 2018, 23,243,763 shares of the registrant’s common
stock, $0.001 par value per share, were outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
5
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|||
|
|
|
|
36
|
|||
|
|
|
|
36
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
37
|
|||
|
|
|
|
37
|
|||
|
|
|
|
37
|
|||
|
|
|
|
37
|
|||
|
|
|
|
37
|
|||
|
|
|
|
37
|
|||
|
|
|
|
38
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
2
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements
Certain
statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may
contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”). All statements other than statements of historical
facts contained in this report are forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the
use of words such as “may,” “will,”
“could,” “should,” “project,”
“intends,” “plans,” “pursue,”
“target,” “continue,”
“believes,” “anticipates,”
“expects,” “estimates,”
“predicts,” or “potential,” the negative of
such terms or variations thereon, or other comparable terminology.
Statements that describe our future plans, strategies, intentions,
expectations, objectives, goals or prospects are also
forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially
from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Readers
should consider carefully the risks described under the “Risk
Factors” section included in our previously filed Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, and other
disclosures contained herein and therein, which describe factors
that could cause our actual results to differ from those
anticipated in forward-looking statements, including, but not
limited to, the following factors:
●
our ability to
repay outstanding loans when due;
●
our limited
liquidity gives substantial doubt about our ability to continue as
a going concern and our ability to finance our exploration,
acquisition and development strategies;
●
reductions in the
borrowing base under our credit facility;
●
impacts to our
financial statements as a result of oil and natural gas property
impairment write-downs;
●
volatility and
weakness in prices for oil and natural gas and the effect of prices
set or influenced by actions of the Organization of the Petroleum
Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) and other oil and natural
gas producing countries;
●
the possibility
that acquisitions and divestitures may involve unexpected costs or
delays, and that acquisitions may not achieve intended benefits and
will divert management’s time and energy, which could have an
adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or
cash flows;
●
risks in connection
with potential acquisitions and the integration of significant
acquisitions;
●
we may incur more
debt and higher levels of indebtedness make us more vulnerable to
economic downturns and adverse developments in our
business;
●
our ability to
successfully develop our inventory of undeveloped acreage in our
resource plays;
●
our oil and natural
gas assets are concentrated in a relatively small number of
properties;
●
access to adequate
gathering systems, processing facilities, transportation take-away
capacity to move our production to market and marketing outlets to
sell our production at market prices;
●
our ability to
generate sufficient cash flow from operations, borrowings or other
sources to enable us to fund our operations, satisfy our
obligations and seek to develop our undeveloped acreage
positions;
●
our ability to
replace our oil and natural gas reserves;
●
the presence or
recoverability of estimated oil and natural gas reserves and actual
future production rates and associated costs;
●
the potential for
production decline rates for our wells to be greater than we
expect;
●
our ability to
retain key members of senior management and key technical
employees;
●
environmental
risks;
3
●
drilling and
operating risks;
●
exploration and
development risks;
●
the possibility
that our industry may be subject to future regulatory or
legislative actions (including additional taxes and changes in
environmental regulations);
●
general economic
conditions, whether internationally, nationally or in the regional
and local market areas in which we do business, may be less
favorable than we expect, including the possibility that economic
conditions in the United States may decline and that capital
markets are disrupted, which could adversely affect demand for oil
and natural gas and make it difficult to access
capital;
●
social unrest,
political instability or armed conflict in major oil and natural
gas producing regions outside the United States, and acts of
terrorism or sabotage in other areas of the world;
●
other economic,
competitive, governmental, regulatory, legislative, including
federal, state and tribal regulations and laws, geopolitical and
technological factors that may negatively impact our business,
operations or oil and natural gas prices;
●
the effect of our
oil and natural gas derivative activities;
●
our insurance
coverage may not adequately cover all losses that we may
sustain;
●
title to the
properties in which we have an interest may be impaired by title
defects;
●
management’s
ability to execute our plans to meet our goals;
●
the cost and
availability of goods and services, such as drilling rigs;
and
●
our dependency on
the skill, ability and decisions of third party operators of the
oil and natural gas properties in which we have a non-operated
working interest.
All
forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their
entirety by the cautionary statements in this section and elsewhere
in this report. Other than as required under applicable securities
laws, we do not assume a duty to update these forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, subsequent
events or circumstances, changes in expectations or otherwise. You
should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the
date of this report or, if earlier, as of the date they were
made.
4
PART I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial
Statements.
Yuma Energy,
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$2,348,627
|
$137,363
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
Trade
|
3,522,107
|
4,496,316
|
Officer
and employees
|
7,781
|
53,979
|
Other
|
441,795
|
1,004,479
|
Prepayments
|
622,843
|
976,462
|
Other
deferred charges
|
387,108
|
347,490
|
|
|
|
Total
current assets
|
7,330,261
|
7,016,089
|
|
|
|
OIL
AND GAS PROPERTIES (full cost method):
|
|
|
Proved
properties
|
504,060,185
|
494,216,531
|
Unproved
properties - not subject to amortization
|
534,627
|
6,794,372
|
|
|
|
|
504,594,812
|
501,010,903
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
(425,547,424)
|
(421,165,400)
|
|
|
|
Net
oil and gas properties
|
79,047,388
|
79,845,503
|
|
|
|
OTHER
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
|
|
|
Assets
held for sale
|
2,309,243
|
-
|
Land,
buildings and improvements
|
-
|
1,600,000
|
Other
property and equipment
|
1,793,397
|
2,845,459
|
|
4,102,640
|
4,445,459
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(1,324,152)
|
(1,409,535)
|
|
|
|
Net
other property and equipment
|
2,778,488
|
3,035,924
|
|
|
|
OTHER
ASSETS AND DEFERRED CHARGES:
|
|
|
Deposits
|
467,592
|
467,592
|
Other
noncurrent assets
|
79,997
|
270,842
|
|
|
|
Total
other assets and deferred charges
|
547,589
|
738,434
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$89,703,726
|
$90,635,950
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
5
Yuma Energy, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS– CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
Current
maturities of debt
|
$35,094,226
|
$651,124
|
Accounts
payable, principally trade
|
8,904,037
|
11,931,218
|
Commodity
derivative instruments
|
2,613,690
|
903,003
|
Asset
retirement obligations
|
88,722
|
277,355
|
Other
accrued liabilities
|
1,555,117
|
2,295,438
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
48,255,792
|
16,058,138
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM
DEBT
|
-
|
27,700,000
|
|
|
|
OTHER
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
Asset
retirement obligations
|
10,492,311
|
10,189,058
|
Commodity
derivative instruments
|
783,338
|
336,406
|
Deferred
rent
|
272,506
|
290,566
|
Employee
stock awards
|
143,961
|
191,110
|
|
|
|
Total
other noncurrent liabilities
|
11,692,116
|
11,007,140
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 2 and 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY
|
|
|
Series
D convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
($0.001
par value, 7,000,000 authorized, 1,971,072 issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
as
of June 30, 2018, and 1,904,391 issued and outstanding as
of
|
|
|
December
31, 2017)
|
1,971
|
1,904
|
Common
stock
|
|
|
($0.001
par value, 100 million shares authorized, 23,242,969 outstanding as
of
|
|
|
June
30, 2018 and 22,661,758 outstanding as of December 31,
2017)
|
23,243
|
22,662
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
57,304,534
|
55,064,685
|
Treasury
stock at cost (380,069 shares as of June 30, 2018 and 13,343
shares
|
|
|
as
of December 31, 2017)
|
(438,890)
|
(25,278)
|
Accumulated
earnings (deficit)
|
(27,135,040)
|
(19,193,301)
|
|
|
|
Total
equity
|
29,755,818
|
35,870,672
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
$89,703,726
|
$90,635,950
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
6
Yuma Energy,
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
of natural gas and crude oil
|
$5,822,577
|
$6,554,704
|
$11,468,113
|
$13,699,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
operating and production costs
|
2,795,825
|
3,059,124
|
5,421,593
|
5,720,388
|
General
and administrative – stock-based
|
|
|
|
|
compensation
|
64,230
|
385,097
|
360,524
|
436,832
|
General
and administrative – other
|
1,587,628
|
1,906,629
|
3,336,866
|
4,082,631
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
2,245,170
|
2,763,444
|
4,462,491
|
5,904,384
|
Asset
retirement obligation accretion expense
|
140,161
|
141,454
|
283,101
|
280,023
|
Impairment
of long lived assets
|
176,968
|
-
|
176,968
|
-
|
Bad
debt expense
|
261,659
|
73,513
|
327,467
|
73,513
|
Total
expenses
|
7,271,641
|
8,329,261
|
14,369,010
|
16,497,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS
FROM OPERATIONS
|
(1,449,064)
|
(1,774,557)
|
(2,900,897)
|
(2,798,643)
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
|
|
|
|
Net
gains (losses) from commodity derivatives
|
(2,095,570)
|
2,138,080
|
(3,346,830)
|
5,694,863
|
Interest
expense
|
(567,635)
|
(482,285)
|
(1,033,927)
|
(978,376)
|
Gain
(loss) on other property and equipment
|
-
|
(70,874)
|
-
|
484,768
|
Other,
net
|
81,884
|
5,659
|
78,348
|
42,067
|
Total
other income (expense)
|
(2,581,321)
|
1,590,580
|
(4,302,409)
|
5,243,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME
(LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
(4,030,385)
|
(183,977)
|
(7,203,306)
|
2,444,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
-
|
(20,581)
|
-
|
5,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
INCOME (LOSS)
|
(4,030,385)
|
(163,396)
|
(7,203,306)
|
2,438,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED
STOCK:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
paid in kind
|
374,416
|
349,300
|
738,433
|
688,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO
|
|
|
|
|
COMMON
STOCKHOLDERS
|
$(4,404,801)
|
$(512,696)
|
$(7,941,739)
|
$1,749,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME
(LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$(0.19)
|
$(0.04)
|
$(0.35)
|
$0.14
|
Diluted
|
$(0.19)
|
$(0.04)
|
$(0.35)
|
$0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NUMBER OF
|
|
|
|
|
COMMON
SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
23,082,334
|
12,235,286
|
22,948,475
|
12,223,337
|
Diluted
|
23,082,334
|
12,235,286
|
22,948,475
|
12,407,996
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
7
Yuma Energy, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
Preferred Stock
|
Common Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in Capital
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Stockholders'
Equity
|
||
|
Shares
|
Value
|
Shares
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
1,904,391
|
$1,904
|
22,661,758
|
$22,662
|
$55,064,685
|
$(25,278)
|
$(19,193,301)
|
$35,870,672
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(7,203,306)
|
(7,203,306)
|
Payment of
Series "D" dividends in kind
|
66,681
|
67
|
-
|
-
|
738,366
|
-
|
(738,433)
|
-
|
Stock
awards vested
|
-
|
-
|
962,063
|
962
|
(962)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Restricted
stock awards forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
(14,126)
|
(14)
|
14
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Restricted
stock awards repurchased
|
-
|
-
|
(366,726)
|
(367)
|
367
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Amortization
of stock-based
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,502,064
|
-
|
-
|
1,502,064
|
Treasury
stock (surrendered to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
settle
employee tax liabilities)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(413,612)
|
-
|
(413,612)
|
June 30, 2018
|
1,971,072
|
$1,971
|
23,242,969
|
$23,243
|
$57,304,534
|
$(438,890)
|
$(27,135,040)
|
$29,755,818
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
8
Yuma Energy,
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
Reconciliation
of net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in)
|
|
|
operating
activities:
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$(7,203,306)
|
$2,438,729
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization of property and equipment
|
4,462,491
|
5,904,384
|
Impairment
of long lived assets
|
176,968
|
-
|
Amortization
of debt issuance costs
|
260,803
|
172,826
|
Deferred
rent liability, net
|
25,668
|
-
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
360,524
|
436,832
|
Settlement
of asset retirement obligations
|
(575,817)
|
(227,346)
|
Asset
retirement obligation accretion expense
|
283,101
|
280,023
|
Bad
debt expense
|
327,467
|
73,513
|
Net
(gains) losses from commodity derivatives
|
3,346,830
|
(5,694,863)
|
Gain
on sales of fixed assets
|
-
|
(556,141)
|
Loss
on write-off of abandoned facilities
|
-
|
71,373
|
(Gain)
loss on write-off of liabilities net of assets
|
(103,045)
|
(34,835)
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable
|
1,339,227
|
426,945
|
Decrease
in prepaids, deposits and other assets
|
297,321
|
521,167
|
(Decrease)
increase in accounts payable and other current and
|
|
|
non-current
liabilities
|
65,487
|
(923,200)
|
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
3,063,719
|
2,889,407
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures for oil and gas properties
|
(6,928,684)
|
(4,526,587)
|
Proceeds
from sale of oil and gas properties
|
1,000,000
|
5,400,563
|
Proceeds
from sale of other fixed assets
|
-
|
641,556
|
Derivative
settlements
|
(1,189,211)
|
550,675
|
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(7,117,895)
|
2,066,207
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
Proceeds
from borrowings on senior credit facility
|
14,300,000
|
-
|
Repayment
of borrowings on senior credit facility
|
(7,000,000)
|
(7,500,000)
|
Repayments
of borrowings - insurance financing
|
(556,898)
|
(512,783)
|
Debt
issuance costs
|
-
|
(2,152)
|
Shelf
registration costs
|
(64,050)
|
-
|
Treasury
stock repurchases
|
(413,612)
|
(23,270)
|
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
6,265,440
|
(8,038,205)
|
|
|
|
CHANGE
IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
2,211,264
|
(3,082,591)
|
|
|
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
137,363
|
3,625,686
|
|
|
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
$2,348,627
|
$543,095
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
Interest
payments (net of interest capitalized)
|
$773,150
|
$811,042
|
Interest
capitalized
|
$133,772
|
$112,136
|
Supplemental
disclosure of significant non-cash activity:
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in capital expenditures financed by accounts
payable
|
$3,252,112
|
$(386,337)
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
9
YUMA ENERGY,
INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization
Yuma Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Yuma” and
collectively with its subsidiaries, the “Company”), is
an independent Houston-based exploration and production company
focused on acquiring, developing and exploring for conventional and
unconventional oil and natural gas resources. Historically, the
Company’s operations have focused on onshore properties
located in central and southern Louisiana and southeastern Texas
where it has a long history of drilling, developing and producing
both oil and natural gas assets. In addition, during 2017 the
Company began acquiring acreage in Yoakum County, Texas, with plans
to explore and develop additional oil and natural gas assets in the
Permian Basin of West Texas. Finally, the Company has operated
positions in Kern County, California, and non-operated positions in
the East Texas Woodbine and the Bakken Shale in North
Dakota.
Basis of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries have been prepared in
accordance with Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X for interim
financial statements required to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information furnished
herein reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for the fair presentation of the
Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2018; the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2018 and 2017; the Consolidated Statement of Changes
in Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2018; and the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June
30, 2018 and 2017. The Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet
at December 31, 2017 is derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements of the Company at that date.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with the
generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of
America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. For further information, see
Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2017.
Interim
period results are not necessarily indicative of results of
operations or cash flows for the full year and accordingly, certain
information normally included in financial statements and the
accompanying notes prepared in accordance with GAAP has been
condensed or omitted. These financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company has evaluated events
or transactions through the date of issuance of these unaudited
consolidated financial statements.
When required for comparability, reclassifications are made to the
prior period financial statements to conform to the current year
presentation.
The accounting standard-setting organizations frequently issue new
or revised accounting rules. The Company regularly reviews new
pronouncements to determine their impact, if any, on the financial
statements.
10
In May
2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09,
“Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which will
supersede most of the existing revenue recognition requirements in
GAAP and will require entities to recognize revenue at an amount
that reflects the consideration to which it expects to be entitled
in exchange for transferring goods or services to a customer. The
new standard also requires disclosures that are sufficient to
enable users to understand an entity’s nature, amount,
timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from
contracts with customers. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU
2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606):
Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross
versus Net). This update provides clarifications in the assessment
of principal versus agent considerations in the new revenue
standard. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow Scope Improvements and
Practical Expedients. The update reduces the potential for
diversity in practice at initial application of Topic 606 and the
cost and complexity of applying Topic 606. In December 2016, the
FASB issued ASU 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to
Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The update was
issued to increase stakeholders’ awareness of the proposals
for technical corrections and to expedite improvements. These ASUs
are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after
December 15, 2017. The Company adopted
these standards effective January 1, 2018 using the full
retrospective method. The Company finalized the detailed analysis
of the impact of the standard on its contracts. The Company found
that there was no significant impact on its financial position or
results of operations. With the adoption of these standards, the
Company was not required to record a cumulative effect adjustment
due to the new standards not having a quantitative impact compared
to existing GAAP (see Note 3 – Revenue Recognition –
Adoption of ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts with
Customers”).
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases,” a new lease
standard requiring lessees to recognize lease assets and lease
liabilities for most leases classified as operating leases under
previous GAAP. The codification was amended through additional
ASUs. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company will
be required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases
that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest
comparative period in the financial statements. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on
its consolidated financial statements, and plans to adopt it no
later than January 1, 2019.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,
“Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718):
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment
Accounting,” which simplifies the accounting for
share-based payment transactions, including the income tax
consequences, classification of awards as either equity or
liabilities, classification on the statement of cash flows, and
accounting for forfeitures. This ASU is effective for annual and
interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company
adopted this ASU on January 1, 2017. The adoption of this standard
did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In
August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash
Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash
Payments,” which provides clarification on how certain cash
receipts and cash payments are presented and classified on the
statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for annual and
interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and is required
to be adopted using a retrospective approach if practicable, with
early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this ASU in the first
quarter of 2018, and the adoption did not have a material impact on
its consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business
Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a
Business,” which assists in determining whether a transaction
should be accounted for as an acquisition or disposal of assets or
as a business. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods
beginning in 2018 and is required to be adopted using a prospective
approach, with early adoption permitted for transactions not
previously reported in issued financial statements. The Company
adopted this ASU on January 1, 2017. The adoption of this ASU did
not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements, however, the Company will apply the
provisions of ASU 2017-01 to future acquisitions.
11
NOTE 2 – Liquidity and Going Concern
The
Company has borrowings under its credit facility which require,
among other things, compliance with certain financial ratios and
covenants. Due to operating losses the Company sustained
during recent quarters, at June 30, 2018 the Company was not in
compliance under the credit facility with its (i) total debt to
EBITDAX covenant for the trailing four quarter period, (ii) current
ratio covenant, (iii) EBITDAX to interest expense covenant for the
trailing four quarter period, and (iv) the liquidity covenant
requiring the Company to maintain unrestricted cash and borrowing
base availability of at least $4.0 million. In addition, due to
this non-compliance, the Company classified its entire bank debt as
a current liability in its financial statements as of June 30,
2018. On July 31, 2018, the Borrowers entered into the Waiver and
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Third
Amendment”) with the Lender. Pursuant to the Third Amendment,
effective as of June 30, 2018, the Borrowers were granted a waiver
for non-compliance from the liquidity covenant to have cash and
cash equivalent investments together with borrowing base
availability under the Credit Agreement of at least $4.0 million.
In addition, as part of the Third Amendment, the Lenders requested
that the Borrowers provide weekly cash flow forecasts and a monthly
accounts payable report to the Lenders. The Third Amendment also
provides for a redetermination of the borrowing base on August 15,
2018.
As of
June 30, 2018, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $35.0
million under its credit facility, and its total borrowing base was
$35.0 million, leaving no undrawn borrowing base. Due to drilling
activities and other factors, the Company had a working capital
deficit of $40.93 million (inclusive of the Company's
outstanding debt under its credit facility) and a loss from
operations of $2.90 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.
See Note 11 – Debt and Interest Expense.
These
breaches of the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement could
result in acceleration of the Company’s indebtedness, in
which case the debt would become immediately due and payable
thereby giving our lenders various rights and remedies, including
foreclosure.
The
significant risks and uncertainties described above raise
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as
a going concern. The consolidated financial statements have been
prepared on a going concern basis of accounting, which contemplates
continuity of operations, realization of assets, and satisfaction
of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of the going concern
uncertainty.
The
Company initiated several strategic alternatives to remedy its
limited liquidity (defined as cash on hand and undrawn borrowing
base), its financial covenant compliance issues, and to provide it
with additional working capital to develop its existing assets.
During the second quarter, the Company entered into an Asset
Purchase and Sale Agreement on May 21, 2018 regarding its Kern
County, California properties, including the sale of all of the
Company’s oil and gas properties, fee properties, land,
buildings, and other property and equipment in consideration of
$4.7 million in gross proceeds and the buyer’s assumption of
certain plugging and abandonment liabilities. The transaction is
scheduled to close by August 31, 2018. Upon the closing of the
transaction, it is anticipated that the majority of the proceeds
will be applied to the repayment of borrowings under the credit
facility. In addition, the Company has reduced its personnel by
eight employees since December 31, 2017, a 24% decrease, including
five positions that were eliminated on June 30, 2018. This brings
the Company’s headcount to 26 employees at June 30, 2018. It
should also be noted that, during the second quarter of 2018, the
Company took additional steps to further reduce its general and
administrative costs by reducing subscriptions, consultants and
other non-essential services, as well as eliminating certain of its
capital expenditures planned for 2018.
Additionally,
the Company plans to take further steps to remedy its limited
liquidity, which may include, but are not limited to, further
reducing or eliminating capital expenditures; entering into
additional commodity derivatives for a portion of the
Company’s anticipated production; further reducing general
and administrative expenses; selling certain non-core assets;
seeking merger and acquisition related opportunities; and
potentially raising proceeds from capital markets transactions,
including the sale of debt or equity securities. There can be no
assurance that the exploration of strategic alternatives will
result in a transaction or otherwise remedy the Company’s
limited liquidity.
12
NOTE 3 – Revenue Recognition – Adoption of ASC 606,
“Revenue from Contracts with Customers”
The
Company recognizes revenues to depict the transfer of control of
promised goods or services to its customers in an amount that
reflects the consideration to which it expects to be entitled to in
exchange for those goods or services.
On
January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards
Codification (“ASC”) 606 using the full retrospective
method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of
December 31, 2016. As a result of electing the full retrospective
adoption approach as described above, results for reporting periods
beginning after December 31, 2016 are presented under ASC
606.
There
was no material impact upon the adoption of ASC 606, and the
Company did not record any adjustments to opening retained earnings
as of January 1, 2017, because its revenue is primarily products
sales revenue accounted for at a point in time.
Crude
oil and condensate are sold through month-to-month evergreen
contracts. The price for Louisiana production is tied to an index
or a weighted monthly average of posted prices with certain
adjustments for gravity, Basic Sediment and Water
(“BS&W”) and transportation. Generally, the index
or posting is based on customary industry spot prices. Pricing for
the Company’s California properties is based on an average of
specified posted prices, adjusted for gravity and transportation.
The Company’s natural gas is sold under month-to-month
contracts with pricing tied to either first of the month index or a
monthly weighted average of purchaser prices received. Natural gas
liquids are sold under month-to-month or year-to-year contracts
usually tied to the related natural gas contract. Pricing is based
on published prices for each product or a monthly weighted average
of purchaser prices received.
Sales
of crude oil, condensates, natural gas and natural gas liquids
(“NGLs”) are recognized at the point control of the
product is transferred to the customer. Virtually all of the
Company’s contracts’ pricing provisions are tied to a
market index, with certain adjustments based on, among other
factors, whether a well delivers to a gathering or transmission
line, quality of the oil or natural gas, and prevailing supply and
demand conditions. As a result, the price of the crude oil,
condensate, natural gas, and NGLs fluctuates to remain competitive
with other available crude oil, natural gas, and NGLs
supplies.
Revenue is measured based on consideration specified in the
contract with the customer, and excludes any amounts collected on
behalf of third parties. The Company recognizes revenue in the
amount that reflects the consideration it expects to be entitled to
in exchange for transferring control of those goods to the
customer. The contract consideration in the Company’s
variable price contracts is typically allocated to specific
performance obligations in the contract according to the price
stated in the contract. Amounts allocated in the Company’s
fixed price contracts are based on the stand-alone selling price of
those products in the context of long-term, fixed price contracts,
which generally approximates the contract price.
The
Company records revenue in the month production is delivered to the
purchaser. However, settlement statements for certain natural gas
and NGL sales may not be received for 30 to 90 days after the date
production is delivered, and as a result, the Company is required
to estimate the amount of production delivered to the purchaser and
the price that will be received for the sale of the product. The
Company records the differences between its estimates and the
actual amounts received for product sales in the month that payment
is received from the purchaser. Any identified differences between
its revenue estimates and actual revenue received historically have
not been significant. For the period from January 1, 2017 through
December 31, 2017, revenue recognized in the reporting period
related to performance obligations satisfied in prior reporting
periods was not material.
Gain or loss on derivative instruments is outside the scope of ASC
606 and is not considered revenue from contracts with customers
subject to ASC 606. The Company may use financial or physical
contracts accounted for as derivatives as economic hedges to manage
price risk associated with normal sales, or in limited cases may
use them for contracts the Company intends to physically settle but
do not meet all of the criteria to be treated as normal
sales.
13
Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Sales
Under
the Company’s natural gas processing contracts, it delivers
natural gas to a midstream processing entity at the wellhead or the
inlet of the midstream processing entity’s system. The
midstream processing entity gathers and processes the natural gas
and remits proceeds to the Company for the resulting sales of NGLs
and residue gas. In these scenarios, the Company evaluates whether
it is the principal or the agent in the transaction. For those
contracts where the Company has concluded it is the principal and
the ultimate third party is its customer, the Company recognizes
revenue on a gross basis, with transportation, gathering,
processing and compression fees presented as an expense in its
lease operating and production costs in the Consolidated Statements
of Operations.
In
certain natural gas processing agreements, the Company may elect to
take its residue gas and/or NGLs in-kind at the tailgate of the
midstream entity’s processing plant and subsequently market
the product. Through the marketing process, the Company delivers
product to the ultimate third-party purchaser at a contractually
agreed-upon delivery point and receives a specified index price
from the purchaser. In this scenario, the Company recognizes
revenue when control transfers to the purchaser at the delivery
point based on the index price received from the purchaser. The
gathering, processing and compression fees attributable to the gas
processing contract, as well as any transportation fees incurred to
deliver the product to the purchaser, are presented as lease
operating and production costs in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
Crude Oil and Condensate Sales
The
Company sells oil production at the wellhead and collects an
agreed-upon index price, net of pricing differentials. In this
scenario, revenue is recognized when control transfers to the
purchaser at the wellhead at the net price received.
The
following table presents the Company’s revenues disaggregated
by product source. Sales taxes are excluded from
revenues.
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
Sales
of natural gas and crude oil:
|
|
|
|
|
Crude
oil and condensate
|
$3,203,260
|
$3,122,848
|
$6,269,517
|
$6,938,780
|
Natural
gas
|
1,775,919
|
2,587,968
|
3,567,170
|
5,141,410
|
Natural
gas liquids
|
843,398
|
843,888
|
1,631,426
|
1,618,938
|
Total
revenues
|
$5,822,577
|
$6,554,704
|
$11,468,113
|
$13,699,128
|
Transaction Price Allocated to Remaining Performance
Obligations
A
significant number of the Company’s product sales are
short-term in nature with a contract term of one year or less. For
those contracts, the Company has utilized the practical expedient
in ASC 606-10-50-14 exempting the Company from disclosure of the
transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations if
the performance obligation is part of a contract that has an
original expected duration of one year or less.
For the
Company’s product sales that have a contract term greater
than one year, it has utilized the practical expedient in ASC
606-10-50-14(a) which states that the Company is not required to
disclose the transaction price allocated to remaining performance
obligations if the variable consideration is allocated entirely to
a wholly unsatisfied performance obligation. Under these sales
contracts, each unit of product generally represents a separate
performance obligation; therefore future volumes are wholly
unsatisfied and disclosure of the transaction price allocated to
remaining performance obligations is not required.
14
Contract Balances
Receivables
from contracts with customers are recorded when the right to
consideration becomes unconditional, generally when control of the
product has been transferred to the customer. Receivables from
contracts with customers
were $2,367,596 and $2,636,867 as of June
30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, and
are reported in trade accounts receivable, net on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The Company currently has no other assets or
liabilities related to its revenue contracts, including no upfront
or rights to deficiency payments.
Practical Expedients
The
Company has made use of certain practical expedients in adopting
the new revenue standard, including not disclosing the value of
unsatisfied performance obligations for (i) contracts with an
original expected length of one year or less, (ii) contracts for
which the Company recognizes revenue at the amount to which the
Company has the right to invoice, (iii) variable consideration
which is allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied performance
obligation and meets the variable allocation criteria in the
standard and (iv) only contracts that are not completed at
transition.
The
Company has not adjusted the promised amount of consideration for
the effects of a significant financing component if the Company
expects, at contract inception, that the period between when the
Company transfers a promised good or service to the customer and
when the customer pays for that good or service will be one year or
less.
NOTE 4 – Asset Impairments
The
Company’s oil and natural gas properties are accounted for
using the full cost method of accounting, under which all
productive and nonproductive costs directly associated with
property acquisition, exploration and development activities are
capitalized. These capitalized costs (net of accumulated DD&A
and deferred income taxes) of proved oil and natural gas properties
are subject to a full cost ceiling limitation. The full cost
ceiling limitation limits these costs to an amount equal to the
present value, discounted at 10%, of estimated future net cash
flows from estimated proved reserves less estimated future
operating and development costs, abandonment costs (net of salvage
value) and estimated related future income taxes. In accordance
with SEC rules, prices used are the 12 month average prices,
calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the
first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12 month
period prior to the end of the reporting period, unless prices are
defined by contractual arrangements. Prices are adjusted for
“basis” or location differentials. Prices are held
constant over the life of the reserves. The Company’s second
quarter of 2018 full cost ceiling calculation was prepared by the
Company using (i) $57.67 per barrel for oil, and (ii) $2.92 per
MMBTU for natural gas as of June 30, 2018. If unamortized costs
capitalized within the cost pool exceed the ceiling, the excess is
charged to expense and separately disclosed during the period in
which the excess occurs. Amounts thus required to be written off
are not reinstated for any subsequent increase in the cost center
ceiling. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018
and 2017, the Company did not record any full cost ceiling
impairments.
NOTE 5 – Asset Retirement Obligations
The
Company has asset retirement obligations (“AROs”)
associated with the future plugging and abandonment of oil and
natural gas properties and related facilities. The accretion of the
ARO is included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Revisions to the liability typically occur due to changes in the
estimated abandonment costs, well economic lives and the discount
rate.
15
The
following table summarizes the Company’s ARO transactions
recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2018 in accordance
with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 410, “Asset Retirement
and Environmental Obligations”.
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
June 30,
2018
|
Asset
retirement obligations at December 31, 2017
|
$10,466,413
|
Liabilities
incurred
|
25,940
|
Liabilities
settled
|
(194,421)
|
Accretion
expense
|
283,101
|
Revisions
in estimated cash flows
|
-
|
|
|
Asset
retirement obligations at June 30, 2018
|
$10,581,033
|
Based
on expected timing of settlements, $88,722 of the ARO is classified
as current at June 30, 2018.
NOTE 6 – Fair Value Measurements
Certain financial instruments are reported at fair value on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under fair value measurement
accounting guidance, fair value is defined as the amount that would
be received from the sale of an asset or paid for the transfer of a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants,
i.e., an exit price. To estimate an exit price, a three-level
hierarchy is used. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs,
which refer broadly to assumptions market participants would use in
pricing an asset or a liability, into three levels. The Company
uses a market valuation approach based on available inputs and the
following methods and assumptions to measure the fair values of its
assets and liabilities, which may or may not be observable in the
market.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments (other than Commodity
Derivative Instruments, see below) – The carrying values of financial instruments,
excluding commodity derivative instruments, comprising current
assets and current liabilities approximate fair values due to the
short-term maturities of these instruments.
Derivatives – The fair
values of the Company’s commodity derivatives are considered
Level 2 as their fair values are based on third-party pricing
models which utilize inputs that are either readily available in
the public market, such as natural gas and oil forward curves and
discount rates, or can be corroborated from active markets or
broker quotes. These values are then compared to the values given
by the Company’s counterparties for reasonableness. The
Company is able to value the assets and liabilities based on
observable market data for similar instruments, which results in
the Company using market prices and implied volatility factors
related to changes in the forward curves. Derivatives are also
subject to the risk that counterparties will be unable to meet
their obligations.
16
|
Fair value measurements at June 30, 2018
|
|||
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices
|
other
|
Significant
|
|
|
in active
|
observable
|
unobservable
|
|
|
markets
|
inputs
|
inputs
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
derivatives – oil
|
$-
|
$3,317,684
|
$-
|
$3,317,684
|
Commodity
derivatives – gas
|
-
|
79,344
|
-
|
79,344
|
Total
liabilities
|
$-
|
$3,397,028
|
$-
|
$3,397,028
|
|
Fair value measurements at December 31, 2017
|
|||
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices
|
other
|
Significant
|
|
|
in active
|
observable
|
unobservable
|
|
|
markets
|
inputs
|
inputs
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
derivatives – oil
|
$-
|
$1,517,410
|
$-
|
$1,517,410
|
Commodity
derivatives – gas
|
-
|
(278,001)
|
-
|
$(278,001)
|
Total
liabilities
|
$-
|
$1,239,409
|
$-
|
$1,239,409
|
Derivative instruments listed above are related to swaps (see Note
7 – Commodity Derivative Instruments).
Debt – The
Company’s debt is recorded at the carrying amount on its
Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Note 11 – Debt and Interest
Expense). The carrying amount of floating-rate debt approximates
fair value because the interest rates are variable and reflective
of market rates.
Asset Retirement Obligations – The Company estimates the fair value of
AROs upon initial recording based on discounted cash flow
projections using numerous estimates, assumptions and judgments
regarding such factors as the existence of a legal obligation for
an ARO, amounts and timing of settlements, the credit-adjusted
risk-free rate to be used and inflation rates (see Note 5 –
Asset Retirement Obligations). Therefore, the Company has
designated the initial recording of these liabilities as Level
3.
Assets Held for Sale –
The fair values of property, plant and equipment, classified as
assets held for sale, and related impairments, which are calculated
using Level 3 inputs, are discussed in Note 14 – Divestitures
and Oil and Gas Asset Sales.
NOTE 7 – Commodity Derivative Instruments
Objective and Strategies for Using Commodity Derivative
Instruments – In order to mitigate the effect of
commodity price uncertainty and enhance the predictability of cash
flows relating to the marketing of the Company’s crude oil
and natural gas, the Company enters into crude oil and natural gas
price commodity derivative instruments with respect to a portion of
the Company’s expected production. The commodity derivative
instruments used include futures, swaps, and options to manage
exposure to commodity price risk inherent in the Company’s
oil and natural gas operations.
Futures
contracts and commodity price swap agreements are used to fix the
price of expected future oil and natural gas sales at major
industry trading locations such as Henry Hub, Louisiana for natural
gas and Cushing, Oklahoma for oil. Basis swaps are used to fix or
float the price differential between product prices at one market
location versus another. Options are used to establish a floor
price, a ceiling price, or a floor and ceiling price (collar) for
expected future oil and natural gas sales.
17
A
three-way collar is a combination of three options: a sold call, a
purchased put, and a sold put. The sold call establishes the
maximum price that the Company will receive for the contracted
commodity volumes. The purchased put establishes the minimum price
that the Company will receive for the contracted volumes unless the
market price for the commodity falls below the sold put strike
price, at which point the minimum price equals the reference price
(e.g., NYMEX) plus the excess of the purchased put strike price
over the sold put strike price.
While
these instruments mitigate the cash flow risk of future reductions
in commodity prices, they may also curtail benefits from future
increases in commodity prices.
The
Company does not apply hedge accounting to any of its derivative
instruments. As a result, gains and losses associated with
derivative instruments are recognized currently in
earnings.
Counterparty Credit Risk – Commodity derivative
instruments expose the Company to counterparty credit risk. The
Company’s commodity derivative instruments are with
Société Générale (“SocGen”) and BP
Energy Company. Commodity derivative contracts are executed under
master agreements which allow the Company, in the event of default,
to elect early termination of all contracts. If the Company chooses
to elect early termination, all asset and liability positions would
be netted and settled at the time of election.
Commodity
derivative instruments open as of June 30, 2018 are provided below.
Natural gas prices are New York Mercantile Exchange
(“NYMEX”) Henry Hub prices, and crude oil prices are
NYMEX West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”).
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
|
Settlement
|
Settlement
|
Settlement
|
NATURAL
GAS (MMBtu):
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
887,533
|
1,660,297
|
1,095,430
|
Price
|
$2.97
|
$2.75
|
$2.68
|
|
|
|
|
CRUDE
OIL (Bbls):
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
89,995
|
156,320
|
|
Price
|
$53.17
|
$53.77
|
|
Derivatives for each commodity are netted on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The following table presents the fair value and
balance sheet location of each classification of commodity
derivative contracts on a gross basis without regard to
same-counterparty netting:
|
Fair value as of
|
|
|
June 30,
2018
|
December 31,
2017
|
Asset
commodity derivatives:
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
$52,439
|
$295,304
|
Noncurrent
assets
|
69,622
|
118
|
Total
asset commodity derivatives
|
122,061
|
295,422
|
|
|
|
Liability
commodity derivatives:
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
(2,666,129)
|
(1,198,307)
|
Noncurrent
liabilities
|
(852,960)
|
(336,524)
|
Total
liability commodity derivatives
|
(3,519,089)
|
(1,534,831)
|
|
|
|
Total
commodity derivative instruments
|
$(3,397,028)
|
$(1,239,409)
|
18
Net gains (losses) from commodity derivatives on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations are comprised of the
following:
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
settlements
|
$(659,847)
|
$451,975
|
$(1,189,211)
|
$550,675
|
Mark
to market on commodity derivatives
|
(1,435,723)
|
1,686,105
|
(2,157,619)
|
5,144,188
|
Net
gains (losses) from commodity derivatives
|
$(2,095,570)
|
$2,138,080
|
$(3,346,830)
|
$5,694,863
|
NOTE 8 – Preferred Stock
Each
share of the Company’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock,
$0.001 par value per share (the “Series D Preferred
Stock”), is convertible into a number of shares of common
stock determined by dividing the original issue price, which was
$11.0741176, by the conversion price, which is currently
$6.5838109. The conversion price is subject to adjustment for stock
splits, stock dividends, reclassification, and certain issuances of
common stock for less than the conversion price. As of June 30,
2018, the Series D Preferred Stock had a liquidation preference of
approximately $21.8 million. The Series D Preferred Stock provides
for cumulative dividends of 7.0% per annum, payable in-kind. The
Company issued 33,810 shares of Series D Preferred Stock during the
three months ended June 30, 2018. The Company does not have any
dividends in arrears at June 30, 2018.
NOTE 9 – Stock-Based Compensation
2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan
On
October 26, 2016, Yuma assumed the Yuma Energy, Inc., a California
corporation (“Yuma California”), 2014 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which was approved by
the shareholders of Yuma California. Under the 2014 Plan, Yuma
could grant stock options, restricted stock awards
(“RSAs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”),
stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), performance units,
performance bonuses, stock awards and other incentive awards to
employees of Yuma and its subsidiaries and affiliates.
At June
30, 2018, 14,126 shares of the 2,495,000 shares of common stock
originally authorized under the 2014 Plan remained available for
future issuance. However, upon adoption of the Company’s 2018
Long-Term Incentive Plan on June 7, 2018, none of these remaining
shares will be issued.
2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan
The
Company’s Board adopted the Yuma Energy, Inc. 2018 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”), and its stockholders
approved the 2018 Plan at the Annual Meeting on June 7, 2018. The
2018 Plan will replace the 2014 Plan; however, the terms and
conditions of the 2014 Plan and related award agreements will
continue to apply to all awards granted under the 2014
Plan.
The
2018 Plan expires on June 7, 2028, and no awards may be granted
under the 2018 Plan after that date. However, the terms and
conditions of the 2018 Plan will continue to apply after that date
to all 2018 Plan awards granted prior to that date until they are
no longer outstanding.
Under
the 2018 Plan, the Company may grant stock options, RSAs, RSUs,
SARs, performance units, performance bonuses, stock awards and
other incentive awards to employees or those of the Company’s
subsidiaries or affiliates, subject to the terms and conditions set
forth in the 2018 Plan. The Company may also grant nonqualified
stock options, RSAs, RSUs, SARs, performance units, stock awards
and other incentive awards to any persons rendering consulting or
advisory services and non-employee directors, subject to the
conditions set forth in the 2018 Plan. Generally, all classes of
the Company’s employees are eligible to participate in the
2018 Plan.
The
2018 Plan provides that a maximum of 4,000,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock may be issued in conjunction with
awards granted under the 2018 Plan. Shares of common stock
cancelled, settled in cash, forfeited, withheld, or tendered by a
participant to satisfy exercise prices or tax withholding
obligations will be available for delivery pursuant to other
awards. At June 30, 2018, all of the 4,000,000 shares of common
stock authorized under the 2018 Plan remain available for future
issuance.
19
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with
FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock
Compensation”. The guidance requires that all
stock-based payments to employees and directors, including grants
of RSUs, be recognized over the requisite service period in the
financial statements based on their fair values.
RSAs,
SARs and Stock Options granted to officers and employees generally
vest in one-third increments over a three-year period, or with
three year cliff vesting, and are contingent on the
recipient’s continued employment. RSAs granted to directors
generally vest in quarterly increments over a one-year
period.
Equity Based Awards – During the three months ended
June 30, 2018, the Company did not grant any RSAs under the 2014
Plan or the 2018 Plan.
Liability Based Awards – During the three months ended
June 30, 2018, the Company did not grant any liability based awards
under the 2014 Plan or the 2018 Plan.
Share Buy-back – During the three months ended June
30, 2018, the Company purchased 10,831 common shares from employees
at a cost of $4,332 in satisfaction of employee tax obligations
upon the vesting of RSAs. During the six months ended June 30,
2018, the Company purchased 366,726 common shares from employees at
a cost of $413,612 in satisfaction of employee tax obligations of
vested RSAs.
Total
share-based compensation expenses recognized for the three months
ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were $64,230 (none capitalized) and
$385,097 (none capitalized), respectively. Total share-based
compensation expenses recognized for the six months ended June 30,
2018 and 2017 were $360,524 (none capitalized) and $436,832 (none
capitalized), respectively.
NOTE 10 – Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Net
Income (Loss) per common share – Basic is calculated by
dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during the period. Net Income (Loss) per common share –
Diluted assumes the conversion of all potentially dilutive
securities, and is calculated by dividing net income (loss)
attributable to common stockholders by the sum of the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus
potentially dilutive securities. Net Income (Loss) per common share
– Diluted considers the impact of potentially dilutive
securities except in periods where their inclusion would have an
anti-dilutive effect.
A
reconciliation of earnings (loss) per common share is as
follows:
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
$(4,404,801)
|
$(512,696)
|
$(7,941,739)
|
$1,749,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
23,082,334
|
12,235,286
|
22,948,475
|
12,223,337
|
Add
potentially dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
restricted stock awards
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
184,659
|
Stock
appreciation rights
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Stock
options
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Series
D preferred stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Diluted
weighted average common shares outstanding
|
23,082,334
|
12,235,286
|
22,948,475
|
12,407,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$(0.19)
|
$(0.04)
|
$(0.35)
|
$0.14
|
Diluted
|
$(0.19)
|
$(0.04)
|
$(0.35)
|
$0.14
|
20
NOTE 11 – Debt and Interest Expense
Long-term
debt consisted of the following:
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
|
|
Senior
credit facility
|
$35,000,000
|
$27,700,000
|
Installment
loan due 7/22/18 originating from the financing of
|
|
|
insurance
premiums at 5.14% interest rate
|
94,226
|
651,124
|
Total
debt
|
35,094,226
|
28,351,124
|
Less:
current maturities
|
(35,094,226)
|
(651,124)
|
Total
long-term debt
|
$-
|
$27,700,000
|
Senior Credit Facility
On
October 26, 2016, Yuma and three of its subsidiaries, as the
co-borrowers (collectively, the “Borrowers”), entered
into a Credit Agreement providing for a $75.0 million three-year
senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Credit
Agreement”) with SocGen, as administrative agent, SG Americas
Securities, LLC, as lead arranger and bookrunner, and the Lenders
signatory thereto (collectively with SocGen, the
“Lender”).
As of
June 30, 2018, the credit facility had a borrowing base of $35.0
million. On July 31, 2018, the Borrowers entered into the Waiver
and Third Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Third
Amendment”) with the Lender. Pursuant to the Third Amendment,
effective as of June 30, 2018, the Borrowers were granted a waiver
for non-compliance from the liquidity covenant to have cash and
cash equivalent investments together with borrowing base
availability under the Credit Agreement of at least $4.0 million.
In addition, as part of the Third Amendment, the Lenders requested
that the Borrowers provide weekly cash flow forecasts and a monthly
accounts payable report to the Lenders. The Third Amendment also
provides for a redetermination of the borrowing base on August 15,
2018.
On May
8, 2018, the Borrowers entered into the Limited Waiver and Second
Amendment to Credit Agreement and Borrowing Base Redetermination
(the “Second Amendment”) with the Lender. Pursuant to
the Second Amendment, which was effective as of March 31, 2018, the
Borrowers were required to enter into additional hedging
arrangements with respect to a substantial portion of the Borrowers
projected production, which the Company complied with in the second
quarter. In addition, in the Second Amendment the terms of the
covenant related to the current ratio were revised to exclude the
current portion of long-term indebtedness outstanding under the
Credit Agreement from current liabilities, and Yuma was required to
provide monthly production and lease operating expense statements
to the Lender. The Second Amendment also provided a waiver of the
financial covenant related to the maximum ratio of total debt to
EBITDAX for the four fiscal quarter period ended March 31, 2018.
The Second Amendment also reduced the borrowing base under the
credit facility to $35.0 million as of May 8, 2018.
The
Credit Agreement governing the Company’s credit facility
provides for interest-only payments until October 26, 2019, when
the Credit Agreement matures and any outstanding borrowings are
due. The borrowing base under the Credit Agreement is subject to
redetermination on April 1st and October
1st of
each year, as well as special redeterminations described in the
Credit Agreement, in each case which may reduce the amount of the
borrowing base.
The
Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are
guaranteed by its subsidiaries and are secured by liens on
substantially all of the Company’s assets, including a
mortgage lien on oil and natural gas properties covering at least
95% of the PV10 value of the proved oil and gas properties included
in the determination of the borrowing base.
21
The
amounts borrowed under the Credit Agreement bear annual interest
rates at either (a) the London Interbank Offered Rate
(“LIBOR”) plus 3.00% to 4.00% or (b) the prime lending
rate of SocGen plus 2.00% to 3.00%, depending on the amount
borrowed under the credit facility and whether the loan is drawn in
U.S. dollars or Euro dollars. The interest rate for the credit
facility at June 30, 2018 was 6.10% for LIBOR-based debt and 8.00%
for prime-based debt. Principal amounts outstanding under the
credit facility are due and payable in full at maturity on October
26, 2019. Additional payments due under the Credit Agreement
include paying a commitment fee to the Lender in respect of the
unutilized commitments thereunder. The commitment rate is 0.50% per
year of the unutilized portion of the borrowing base in effect from
time to time. The Company is also required to pay customary letter
of credit fees.
In
addition, the Credit Agreement requires the Company to maintain the
following financial covenants: a current ratio of not less than 1.0
to 1.0 on the last day of each quarter, a ratio of total debt to
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion,
amortization and exploration expenses (“EBITDAX”) ratio
of not greater than 3.5 to 1.0 for the four fiscal quarters ending
on the last day of the fiscal quarter immediately preceding such
date of determination, and a ratio of EBITDAX to interest expense
of not less than 2.75 to 1.0 for the four fiscal quarters ending on
the last day of the fiscal quarter immediately preceding such date
of determination, and cash and cash equivalent investments together
with borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement of at least
$4.0 million. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative
covenants and defines events of default for credit facilities of
this type, including failure to pay principal or interest, breach
of covenants, breach of representations and warranties, insolvency,
judgment default, and a change of control. Upon the occurrence and
continuance of an event of default, the Lender has the right to
accelerate repayment of the loans and exercise its remedies with
respect to the collateral.
As of
June 30, 2018, the Company was not in compliance under the credit
facility with its (i) total debt to EBITDAX covenant for the
trailing four quarter period, (ii) current ratio covenant, (iii)
EBITDAX to interest expense covenant for the trailing four quarter
period, and (iv) the liquidity covenant requiring the Company to
maintain unrestricted cash and borrowing base availability of at
least $4.0 million. Due to this non-compliance, the Company
classified its entire bank debt as a current liability in its
financial statements as of June 30, 2018. On July 31, 2018, the
Company received a waiver from its lenders to its lack of
compliance with its liquidity covenant requiring unrestricted cash
and borrowing base availability of at least $4.0 million. The
Borrowers’ bank covenant calculations for the second quarter
ended June 30, 2018 are due by August 29, 2018. Upon submission of
these covenant calculations the Borrower intends to seek a waiver
for the covenant violations related to the i) total debt to EBITDAX
covenant, (ii) current ratio covenant, and (iii) EBITDAX to
interest expense covenant for the second quarter. There can be no
assurance that the Lenders will grant these waivers, as they
represent breaches of the terms and conditions of the Credit
Agreement and could result in acceleration of the Company’s
indebtedness, in which case the debt would become immediately due
and payable thereby giving the Lenders various rights and remedies,
including foreclosure. The Company currently anticipates
non-compliance with various financial covenants at September 30,
2018. See Note 2 – Liquidity and Going Concern.
The
Company incurred commitment fees in connection with our Credit
Agreement of $4,735 and $6,751 during the three months ended June
30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $19,170 and $12,376 during the
six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
NOTE 12 – Stockholders’ Equity
Yuma is authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common
stock, $0.001 par value per share, and 20,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share. The holders of common
stock are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock,
except as otherwise required by law. The Company has designated
7,000,000 shares of preferred stock as Series D Preferred
Stock.
See Note 9 – Stock-Based Compensation, which describes
outstanding stock options, RSAs and SARs granted under the 2014
Plan and the provisions of the 2018 Plan adopted on June 7,
2018.
22
NOTE 13 – Income Taxes
The
Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended June
30, 2018 and 2017 was 0.00% and 11.19%, respectively. The
difference between the statutory federal income taxes calculated
using a U.S. Federal statutory corporate income tax rate of 21% and
the Company’s effective tax rate of 0.00% for the three
months ended June 30, 2018 was primarily related to the valuation
allowance on the deferred tax assets and state income taxes. The
difference between the statutory federal income taxes calculated
using a U.S. Federal statutory corporate income tax rate of 35% and
the Company’s effective tax rate of 11.19% for the three
months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily related to the valuation
allowance on the deferred tax assets and state income
taxes.
The
Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June
30, 2018 and 2017 was 0.00% and 0.24%, respectively. The difference
between the statutory federal income taxes calculated using a U.S.
Federal statutory corporate income tax rate of 21% and the
Company’s effective tax rate of 0.00% for the six months
ended June 30, 2018 was primarily related to the valuation
allowance on the deferred tax assets and state income taxes. The
difference between the statutory federal income taxes calculated
using a U.S. Federal statutory corporate income tax rate of 35% and
the Company’s effective tax rate of 0.24% for the six months
ended June 30, 2017 was primarily related to the valuation
allowance on the deferred tax assets and state income
taxes.
As of
June 30, 2018, the Company had federal and state net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $176.9 million which expire between
2022 and 2038. Of this amount, approximately $59.5 million is
subject to limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), which could
result in some amounts expiring prior to being utilized.
Realization of a deferred tax asset is dependent, in part, on
generating sufficient taxable income prior to expiration of the
loss carryforwards.
The
Company provides for deferred income taxes on the difference
between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its carrying
amount in the financial statements in accordance FASB ASC Topic
740, “Income Taxes”. This difference will result in
taxable income or deductions in future years when the reported
amount of the asset or liability is recovered or settled,
respectively. In recording deferred tax assets, the Company
considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred income tax asset will be realized. The ultimate
realization of deferred income tax assets, if any, is dependent
upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in
which those deferred income tax assets would be deductible. Based
on the available evidence, the Company has recorded a full
valuation allowance against its net deferred tax
assets.
NOTE 14 – Divestitures and Oil and Gas Asset
Sales
The
Company entered into an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement on May
21, 2018 regarding its Kern County, California properties,
including the sale of all of the Company’s oil and gas
properties, fee properties, land, buildings, and other property and
equipment for gross proceeds of $4.7 million and the buyer’s
assumption of certain plugging and abandonment liabilities. The
transaction is scheduled to close by August 31, 2018. In relation
to the sale, the Company classified its land, buildings and other
property and equipment located in Kern County as Held for sale in
the second quarter, which required valuation of these assets at the
lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Valuation
of these assets resulted in an impairment charge of $176,968. The
assets held for sale consist of land and building and other
property and equipment with estimated fair values less costs to
sell of $1,511,884 and $797,359, respectively, at June 30,
2018.
In
January 2018, the Company sold a 12.5% working interest in ten
sections of the project in Yoakum County, Texas, known as Mario,
for $500,000. Additionally, the December 2017 sale of a 12.5%
working interest under the same terms was settled in January 2018
for $500,000, bringing the total sales proceeds received to
$1,000,000.
23
NOTE 15 – Commitments and Contingencies
Joint Development Agreement
On
March 27, 2017, the Company entered into a Joint Development
Agreement (“JDA”) with two privately held companies,
both unaffiliated entities, covering an area of approximately 52
square miles (33,280 acres) in the Permian Basin of Yoakum County,
Texas. In connection with the JDA, the Company held a 75% working
interest in approximately 3,669 acres (2,752 net acres) as of
December 31, 2017. As the operator of the property covered by the
JDA, the Company was committed as of June 30, 2018 to spend an
additional $276,708 by March 2020.
Throughput Commitment Agreement
On
August 1, 2014, Crimson Energy Partners IV, LLC, as operator of the
Company’s Chalktown properties, in which the Company has a
working interest, entered into a throughput commitment (the
“Commitment”) with ETC Texas Pipeline, Ltd. effective
April 1, 2015 for a five year throughput commitment. In connection
with the Commitment, the operator and the Company failed to reach
the volume commitments in year two, and the Company anticipates
that a shortfall will exist through the expiration of the five year
term, which expires in March 2020. Accordingly, the Company is
accruing the expected volume commitment shortfall amounts of
approximately $29,000 per month to lease operating expense
(“LOE”) based on production, which represents the
maximum amounts that could be owed based upon the
Commitment.
Lease Agreements
On July
26, 2017, the Company entered into a tenth amendment to its office
lease whereby the term of the lease was extended to August 31,
2023. The lease amendment covers a period of 68 calendar
months and went into effect on January 1, 2018. In addition,
the lease amendment included seven months of abated rent and
operating expenses from June 1, 2017 through February 1, 2018, as
well as other incentives, including abated parking cost and tenant
lease improvement allowances. The base rent amount (which
began on January 1, 2018) starts at $258,060 per annum and
escalates to $288,420 per annum during the final 19 months of the
lease extension. In addition to the base rent amount, the
Company will also be responsible for additional operating expenses
of the building as well as parking charges once the abatement
period ends. The Company accounts for the lease as an
operating lease under GAAP.
The Company also currently leases approximately 3,200 square feet
of office space at an off-site location as a storage facility. The
current lease expires on April 30, 2020.
Certain Legal Proceedings
From
time to time, the Company is party to various legal proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company expenses or
accrues legal costs as incurred. A summary of the Company’s
legal proceedings is as follows:
Yuma Energy, Inc. v. Cardno PPI Technology Services, LLC
Arbitration
On May
20, 2015, counsel for Cardno PPI Technology Services, LLC
(“Cardno PPI”) sent a notice of the filing of liens
totaling $304,209 on the Company’s Crosby 14 No. 1 Well and
Crosby 14 SWD No. 1 Well in Vernon Parish, Louisiana. The Company
disputed the validity of the liens and of the underlying invoices,
and notified Cardno PPI that applicable credits had not been
applied. The Company invoked mediation on August 11, 2015 on the
issues of the validity of the liens, the amount due pursuant to
terms of the parties’ Master Service Agreement
(“MSA”), and PPI Cardno’s breaches of the MSA.
Mediation was held on April 12, 2016; no settlement was
reached.
24
On May
12, 2016, Cardno filed a lawsuit in Louisiana state court to
enforce the liens; the Court entered an Order Staying Proceeding on
June 13, 2016, ordering that the lawsuit “be stayed pending
mediation/arbitration between the parties.” On June 17, 2016,
the Company served a Notice of Arbitration on Cardno PPI, stating
claims for breach of the MSA billing and warranty provisions. On
July 15, 2016, Cardno PPI served a Counterclaim for $304,209 plus
attorneys’ fees. The parties selected an arbitrator, and the
arbitration hearing was held on March 29, April 12 and April 13,
2018. The parties submitted closing statements on April 30, 2018.
Management intends to pursue the Company’s claims and to
defend the counterclaim vigorously. At this point in the legal
process, no evaluation of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome
or associated economic loss can be made; therefore no liability has
been recorded on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
The Parish of St. Bernard v. Atlantic Richfield Co., et
al
On
October 13, 2016, two subsidiaries of the Company, Yuma Exploration
and Production Company, Inc. (“Exploration”) and Yuma
Petroleum Company (“YPC”), were named as defendants,
among several other defendants, in an action by the Parish of St.
Bernard in the Thirty-Fourth Judicial District of Louisiana. The
petition alleges violations of the State and Local Coastal
Resources Management Act of 1978, as amended, in the St. Bernard
Parish. The Company has notified its insurance carrier of the
lawsuit. Management intends to defend the plaintiffs’
claims vigorously. The case was removed to federal district
court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. A motion to remand was
filed and the Court officially remanded the case on July 6, 2017.
Exceptions for Exploration, YPC and the other defendants were
filed; however, the hearing for such exceptions was continued from
the original date of October 6, 2017 to November 22, 2017. The
November 22, 2017 hearing was continued without date because the
parties agreed the case will be de-cumulated into subcases, but the
details of this are yet to be determined. The case was removed
again on other grounds on May 23, 2018. On May 25, 2018, a Motion
was filed on behalf of certain defendants with the United States
Judicial Panel for Multi District Litigation (“JPMDL”)
for consolidated proceedings for all 41 pending cases filed in
Louisiana with claims that are substantially the same as those in
this case. A 42nd case has been added
as a “tag-along”. In the interim, plaintiffs timely
filed their Motion to Remand in the case. Hearing on the Motion
before the JPMDL was held on July 26, 2018 in Santa Fe, New Mexico,
and the JPMDL denied centralization by Order dated July 31, 2018.
The Order indicates Plaintiffs may be willing to consolidate all
cases pending in the Western District with those in the Eastern
District, although Defendants may not be amenable to same. It is
impossible to predict at this time how this case will now proceed
other than that there will be a schedule set for opposition to the
Motion to Remand and eventually a decision will be made as to
whether this second removal will keep the case in federal court. At
this point in the legal process, no evaluation of the likelihood of
an unfavorable outcome or associated economic loss can be made;
therefore no liability has been recorded on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
Cameron Parish vs. BEPCO LP, et al & Cameron Parish vs. Alpine
Exploration Companies, Inc., et al.
The
Parish of Cameron, Louisiana, filed a series of lawsuits against
approximately 190 oil and gas companies alleging that the
defendants, including Davis Petroleum Acquisition Corp.
(“Davis”), have failed to clear, revegetate, detoxify,
and restore the mineral and production sites and other areas
affected by their operations and activities within certain coastal
zone areas to their original condition as required by Louisiana
law, and that such defendants are liable to Cameron Parish for
damages under certain Louisiana coastal zone laws for such
failures; however, the amount of such damages has not been
specified. Two of these lawsuits, originally filed February 4, 2016
in the 38th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Cameron,
State of Louisiana, name Davis as defendant, along with more than
30 other oil and gas companies. Both cases have been removed to
federal district court for the Western District of Louisiana. The
Company denies these claims and intends to vigorously defend them.
Davis has become a party to the Joint Defense and Cost Sharing
Agreements for these cases. Motions to remand were filed and the
Magistrate Judge recommended that the cases be remanded. The
Company was advised that the new District Judge assigned to these
cases is Judge Terry A. Doughty, and on May 9, 2018, Judge Doughty
agreed with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and the
cases were remanded to the 38th Judicial District
Court, Cameron Parish, Louisiana. The cases were removed again on
other grounds on May 23, 2018. On May 25, 2018, a Motion was filed
on behalf of certain defendants with the United States Judicial
Panel for Multi District Litigation (“JPMDL”) for
consolidated proceedings for all 41 pending cases filed in
Louisiana with claims that are substantially the same as those in
these cases. A 42nd case has been added
as a “tag-along”. In the interim, plaintiffs timely
filed their Motion to Remand in the cases. Hearing on the Motion
before the JPMDL was held on July 26, 2018 in Santa Fe, New Mexico,
and the JPMDL denied centralization by Order dated July 31, 2018.
The Order indicates Plaintiffs may be willing to consolidate all
cases pending in the Western District with those in the Eastern
District, although Defendants may not be amenable to same. It is
impossible to predict at this time how these cases will now proceed
other than that there will be a schedule set for opposition to the
Motions to Remand and eventually a decision will be made as to
whether this second removal will keep the cases in federal court.
At this point in the legal process, no evaluation of the likelihood
of an unfavorable outcome or associated economic loss can be made;
therefore no liability has been recorded on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
25
Louisiana, et al. Escheat Tax Audits
The
States of Louisiana, Texas, Minnesota, North Dakota and Wyoming
have notified the Company that they will examine the
Company’s books and records to determine compliance with each
of the examining state’s escheat laws. The review is being
conducted by Discovery Audit Services, LLC. The Company has engaged
Ryan, LLC to represent it in this matter. The exposure related to
the audits is not currently determinable and therefore, no
liability has been recorded on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
Louisiana Severance Tax Audit
The
State of Louisiana, Department of Revenue, notified Exploration
that it was auditing Exploration’s calculation of its
severance tax relating to Exploration’s production from
November 2012 through March 2016. The audit relates to the
Department of Revenue’s recent interpretation of
long-standing oil purchase contracts to include a disallowable
“transportation deduction,” and thus to assert that the
severance tax paid on crude oil sold during the contract term was
not properly calculated. The Department of Revenue sent a
proposed assessment in which they sought to impose $476,954 in
additional state severance tax plus associated penalties and
interest. Exploration engaged legal counsel to protest
the proposed assessment and request a hearing. Exploration
then entered a Joint Defense Group of operators challenging similar
audit results. Since the Joint Defense Group is challenging
the same legal theory, the Board of Tax Appeals proposed to hear a
motion brought by one of the taxpayers that would address the rule
for all through a test case. Exploration’s case has
been stayed pending adjudication of the test case. The hearing for
the test case was held on November 7, 2017, and on December 6,
2017, the Board of Tax Appeals rendered judgment in favor of the
taxpayer in the first of these cases. The Department of Revenue
filed an appeal to this decision on January 5, 2018 and the Company
is still waiting for the case record to be lodged at the Louisiana
Third Circuit Court of Appeal. At this point in the legal process,
no evaluation of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or
associated economic loss can be made; therefore no liability has
been recorded on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
The
Company received notice from the Louisiana Department of Wildlife
and Fisheries (“LDWF”) in July 2017 stating that
Exploration has open Coastal Use Permits (“CUPs”)
located within the Louisiana Public Oyster Seed Grounds dating back
from as early as November 1993 and through a period ending in
November 2012. The majority of the claims relate to permits
that were filed from 2000 to 2005. Pursuant to the conditions
of each CUP, LDWF is alleging that damages were caused to the
oyster seed grounds and that compensation of an aggregate amount of
approximately $500,000 is owed by the Company. The Company is
currently evaluating the merits of the claim, is reviewing the LDWF
analysis, and has now requested that the LDWF revise downward the
amount of area their claims of damages pertain to. At this point in
the regulatory process, no evaluation of the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome or associated economic loss can be made;
therefore no liability has been recorded on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
Miami Corporation – South Pecan Lake Field Area
P&A
The
Company, along with several other exploration and production
companies in the chain of title, received letters in June 2017 from
representatives of Miami Corporation demanding the performance of
well plugging and abandonment, facility removal and restoration
obligations for wells in the South Pecan Lake Field Area, Cameron
Parish, Louisiana. Apache is one of the other companies in the
chain of title, and after taking a field tour of the area, has sent
to the Company, along with BP and other companies in the chain of
title, a proposed work plan to comply with the Miami Corporation
demand. The Company is currently evaluating the merits of the claim
and the proposed work plan. At this point in the process, no
evaluation of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or
associated economic loss can be made; therefore no liability has
been recorded on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
26
John Hoffman v. Yuma Exploration & Production Company, Inc., et
al.
This
lawsuit, filed on June 15, 2018 in Livingston Parish, Louisiana,
relates to a slip and fall injury to Mr. Hoffman that occurred on
August 28, 2017. Mr. Hoffman was apparently an employee of a
subcontractor of a contractor performing services for Exploration.
The Company believes that its contractor is responsible for
injuries to employees of the contractor or subcontractor and that
their insurance coverage, or insurance coverage maintained by the
Company, should cover damages awarded to Mr. Hoffman, if any. The
Company has notified its insurance carrier of the
lawsuit.
Hall-Degravelles, L.L.C. v. Cockrell Oil Corporation, et
al.
Exploration,
as a successor in interest from another company years ago, along
with 41 other companies in the chain of title, was named as a
defendant in this lawsuit brought in St. Mary’s Parish,
Louisiana on July 9, 2018. The plaintiff alleges that it owns
property in St. Mary’s Parish and that it has acquired rights
from former owners of the property to pursue claims for monetary
and punitive damages, property remediation and other relief against
the defendants for alleged contamination and damage to the property
from their oil and gas exploration and production activities over
the years. The Company has notified its insurance carrier of the
claim but believes that the suit is without merit. No evaluation of
the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or associated economic
loss can be made at this early stage, therefore no liability has
been recorded on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
NOTE 16 – Subsequent Events
The
Company is not aware of any subsequent events which would require
recognition or disclosure in its consolidated financial statements,
except as noted below or disclosed in the Company’s filings
with the SEC.
On July
31, 2018, the Company entered into the Waiver and Third Amendment
to its Credit Agreement with its lender (see Note 2 –
Liquidity and Going Concern and Note 11 – Debt and Interest
Expense).
Item
2.
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and
related notes thereto, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q and should further be read in conjunction with
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2017.
Statements in this
discussion may be forward-looking. These forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below,
which cause actual results to differ from those expressed. For more
information, see “Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 1 above.
Overview
Yuma
Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Yuma” and
collectively with its subsidiaries, the “Company,”
“we,” “us” and “our”), is an
independent Houston-based exploration and production company
focused on acquiring, developing and exploring for conventional and
unconventional oil and natural gas resources. Historically, our
operations have focused on onshore properties located in central
and southern Louisiana and southeastern Texas where we have a long
history of drilling, developing and producing both oil and natural
gas assets. In addition, during 2017 we began acquiring acreage in
an extension of the San Andres formation in Yoakum County, Texas,
with plans to explore and develop additional oil and natural gas
assets in the Permian Basin of West Texas. Finally, we have
operated positions in Kern County, California, and non-operated
positions in the East Texas Woodbine and the Bakken Shale in North
Dakota. Our common stock is listed on the NYSE American under the
trading symbol “YUMA.”
27
Permian Basin
In
2017, we entered the Permian Basin through a joint venture with two
privately held energy companies and established an Area of Mutual
Interest (“AMI”) covering approximately 33,280 acres in
Yoakum County, Texas, located in the Northwest Shelf of the Permian
Basin. The primary target within the AMI is the San Andres
formation, which has been one of the largest producing formations
in Texas to date. As of June 30, 2018, we held a 62.5% working
interest in approximately 4,823 gross acres (3,014 net acres)
within the AMI. In November 2017, we drilled a salt water disposal
well, the Jameson SWD #1. In December 2017, we spudded the State
320 #1H horizontal San Andres well, which was subsequently
completed in February 2018. We opened the well on March 1, 2018 and
placed the well on production. As of July 17, 2018, the well
has produced a total of 1,708 barrels of oil, 12,748 Mcf of gas,
and 421,603 barrels of water. The well is currently shut-in pending
evaluation of the commerciality and future development of the
prospect area. Given the well performance to date, the ability to
establish commercial production in the prospect area is uncertain
at this time.
Preferred Stock
As of
June 30, 2018, we had 1,971,072 shares of our Series D preferred
stock outstanding with an aggregate liquidation preference of
approximately $21.8 million and a conversion price of $6.5838109
per share. If all of our outstanding shares of Series D preferred
stock were converted into common stock, we would need to issue
approximately 3.3 million shares of common stock. The Series D
preferred stock is paid dividends in the form of additional shares
of Series D preferred stock at a rate of 7% per annum
(cumulative).
Results of Operations
Production
The
following table presents the net quantities of oil, natural gas and
natural gas liquids produced and sold by us for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and the average sales price
per unit sold.
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
Production
volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
Crude
oil and condensate (Bbls)
|
47,322
|
66,242
|
94,479
|
142,640
|
Natural
gas (Mcf)
|
538,241
|
786,111
|
1,171,681
|
1,685,538
|
Natural
gas liquids (Bbls)
|
28,974
|
35,092
|
54,217
|
68,566
|
Total (Boe) (1)
|
166,003
|
232,353
|
343,976
|
492,129
|
Average
prices realized:
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil and condensate (per Bbl)
|
$67.69
|
$47.14
|
$66.36
|
$48.65
|
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
$3.30
|
$3.29
|
$3.04
|
$3.05
|
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl)
|
$29.11
|
$24.05
|
$30.09
|
$23.61
|
(1)
Barrels of oil
equivalent have been calculated on the basis of six thousand cubic
feet (Mcf) of natural gas equal to one barrel of oil equivalent
(Boe).
Revenues
The
following table presents our revenues for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
Sales
of natural gas and crude oil:
|
|
|
|
|
Crude
oil and condensate
|
$3,203,260
|
$3,122,848
|
$6,269,517
|
$6,938,780
|
Natural
gas
|
1,775,919
|
2,587,968
|
3,567,170
|
5,141,410
|
Natural
gas liquids
|
843,398
|
843,888
|
1,631,426
|
1,618,938
|
Total
revenues
|
$5,822,577
|
$6,554,704
|
$11,468,113
|
$13,699,128
|
28
Sale of Crude Oil and Condensate
Crude
oil and condensate are sold through month-to-month evergreen
contracts. The price for Louisiana production is tied to an index
or a weighted monthly average of posted prices with certain
adjustments for gravity, Basic Sediment and Water
(“BS&W”) and transportation. Generally, the index
or posting is based on customary industry spot prices. Pricing for
our California properties is based on an average of specified
posted prices, adjusted for gravity and
transportation.
Crude
oil volumes sold were 28.6%, or 18,920 Bbls, lower for the three
months ended June 30, 2018 compared to crude oil volumes sold
during the three months ended June 30, 2017, due primarily to a
decrease of 5,478 Bbls resulting from divesting the El Halcón
Field during the second quarter of 2017. Additional decreases
included the Cameron Canal Field (2,381 Bbls), the Livingston Field
(2,730 Bbls), La Posada (2,164 Bbls) and Main Pass 4 (2,785 Bbls).
Realized crude oil prices experienced a 43.6% increase from the
three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2018.
Crude
oil volumes sold were 33.8%, or 48,161 Bbls, lower for the six
months ended June 30, 2018 compared to crude oil volumes sold
during the three months ended June 30, 2017, due primarily to a
decrease of 15,300 Bbls resulting from divesting the El Halcón
Field during the second quarter of 2017. Additional decreases
included the Cameron Canal Field (8,458 Bbls), the Livingston Field
(5,289 Bbls), Main Pass 4 (4,919 Bbls), La Posada (4,707 Bbls) and
the Chalktown Field (2,820 Bbls). Realized crude oil prices
experienced a 36.4% increase from the six months ended June 30,
2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018.
Sale of Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids
Our
natural gas is sold under month-to-month contracts with pricing
tied to either first of the month index or a monthly weighted
average of purchaser prices received. Natural gas liquids are sold
under month-to-month or year-to-year contracts usually tied to the
related natural gas contract. Pricing is based on published prices
for each product or a monthly weighted average of purchaser prices
received.
For the
three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2017, we experienced a 31.5%, or 247,870 Mcf, decrease in
natural gas volumes sold and a decrease in natural gas liquids sold
of 17.4%, or 6,118 Bbls. The decreases were due primarily to
decreases at the Cameron Canal Field (66,705 Mcf), the Lac Blanc
Field (70,302 Mcf) and La Posada (113,509 Mcf). During the same
period, realized natural gas prices increased by 0.3% and realized
natural gas liquids prices increased by 21.0%.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2017, we experienced a 30.5%, or 513,857 Mcf, decrease in
natural gas volumes sold and a decrease in natural gas liquids sold
of 20.9%, or 14,349 Bbls. The decreases were due primarily to
decreases at La Posada (254,773 Bbls), the Cameron Canal Field
(185,931 Bbls) and the Lac Blanc Field (30,033 Bbls). During the
same period, realized natural gas prices decreased by 0.3% and
realized natural gas liquids prices increased by
27.4%.
29
Expenses
Lease Operating Expenses
Our
lease operating expenses (“LOE”) and LOE per Boe for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, are set
forth below:
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
Lease
operating expenses
|
$1,890,809
|
$1,844,896
|
$3,556,129
|
$3,542,804
|
Severance,
ad valorem taxes and
|
|
|
|
|
marketing
|
905,016
|
1,214,228
|
1,865,464
|
2,177,584
|
Total LOE
|
$2,795,825
|
$3,059,124
|
$5,421,593
|
$5,720,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOE
per Boe
|
$16.84
|
$13.17
|
$15.76
|
$11.62
|
LOE
per Boe without severance,
|
|
|
|
|
ad
valorem taxes and marketing
|
$11.39
|
$7.94
|
$10.34
|
$7.20
|
LOE
includes all costs incurred to operate wells and related
facilities, both operated and non-operated. In addition to direct
operating costs such as labor, repairs and maintenance, equipment
rentals, materials and supplies, fuel and chemicals, LOE also
includes severance taxes, product marketing and transportation
fees, insurance, ad valorem taxes and operating agreement allocable
overhead.
The
8.6% decrease in total LOE for the three months ended June 30, 2018
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017 was due to a
decrease of $82,534 related to the sale of the El Halcón Field
during the second quarter of 2017, a decrease of $48,916 in the
Livingston Field due to a reduction of active wells, a decrease of
$38,912 at Lac Blanc due to decreased field-related costs, and a
$27,123 decrease in costs related to our California field
operations. These reductions were offset by an increase of
$136,690 for our Permian operations which came online in the first
quarter of 2018, and a $37,773 increase for the Main Pass 4
workover. LOE per barrel of oil equivalent increased by 27.9%
from the same period of the prior year generally due to the
decrease in volumes noted above while a substantial portion of LOE
is related to fixed costs.
The
5.2% decrease in total LOE for the six months ended June 30, 2018
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017 was due to a
decrease of $227,891 related to the sale of the El Halcón
Field during the second quarter of 2017, a decrease of $73,570 in
the Livingston Field due to a reduction of active wells, and a
$90,159 decrease in costs related to our California field
operations. These reductions were offset by an increase of
$162,576 for our Permian operations which came online in the first
quarter of 2018, a $73,116 increase at La Posada from production
facility expenses, and a $66,033 increase for the Main Pass 4
workover. LOE per barrel of oil equivalent increased by 35.6%
from the same period of the prior year generally due to the
decrease in volumes noted above while a substantial portion of LOE
is related to fixed costs.
30
General and Administrative Expenses
Our
general and administrative (“G&A”) expenses for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, are summarized
as follows:
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
General
and administrative:
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
$64,230
|
$385,097
|
$360,524
|
$436,832
|
Capitalized
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Net stock-based compensation
|
64,230
|
385,097
|
360,524
|
436,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
1,853,316
|
2,329,938
|
3,980,513
|
4,926,860
|
Capitalized
|
(265,688)
|
(423,309)
|
(643,647)
|
(844,229)
|
Net other
|
1,587,628
|
1,906,629
|
3,336,866
|
4,082,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
general and administrative expenses
|
$1,651,858
|
$2,291,726
|
$3,697,390
|
$4,519,463
|
G&A
Other primarily consists of overhead expenses, employee
remuneration and professional and consulting fees. We capitalize
certain G&A expenditures relating to oil and natural gas
acquisition, exploration and development activities following the
full cost method of accounting.
For the
three months ended June 30, 2018, net G&A expenses were 27.9%,
or $639,868, lower than the amount for the same period in 2017.
Variances include a decrease in accounting and audit fees of
$45,078, a decrease in consulting fees of $71,297, a decrease in
salaries and stock compensation of $178,337 and $320,867,
respectively, a decrease in franchise taxes of $97,351, a decrease
in costs associated with the Company’s acquisition of Davis
Petroleum Acquisition Corp. (“Davis”) of $75,000,
offset by an increase in termination benefits of $169,825. The
decrease in stock compensation was primarily a result of the
reevaluation of liability-based SARs in the second
quarter.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2018, net G&A expenses were 18.2%, or
$822,073, lower than the amount for the same period in 2017.
Variances include a decrease in accounting and audit fees of
$202,467, a decrease in consulting fees of $128,718, a decrease in
salaries and stock compensation of $321,951 and $76,308,
respectively, a decrease in costs associated with the
Company’s acquisition of Davis of $251,195, offset by an
increase in termination benefits of $169,825.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
Our
depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”)
for oil and gas properties (excluding DD&A related to other
property, plant and equipment) for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2018 and 2017, is summarized as follows:
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Eneded
June 30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
DD&A
|
$2,204,936
|
$2,763,444
|
$4,382,023
|
$5,904,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
DD&A
per Boe
|
$13.28
|
$11.89
|
$12.74
|
$12.00
|
DD&A decreased
by 20.2% and 25.8% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018
compared to the same periods in 2017, primarily as a result of the
decrease in the net quantities of crude oil and natural gas
sold.
31
Impairment of Oil and Natural Gas Properties
We
utilize the full cost method of accounting to account for our oil
and natural gas exploration and development activities. Under this
method of accounting, we are required on a quarterly basis to
determine whether the book value of our oil and natural gas
properties (excluding unevaluated properties) is less than or equal
to the “ceiling,” based upon the expected after tax
present value (discounted at 10%) of the future net cash flows from
our proved reserves, excluding gains or losses from derivatives.
Any excess of the net book value of our oil and natural gas
properties over the ceiling must be recognized as a non-cash
impairment expense. During the three and six months ended June 30,
2018 and 2017, we did not record any full cost ceiling impairments.
Changes in production rates, levels of reserves, future development
costs, transfers of unevaluated properties, and other factors will
determine our actual ceiling test calculation and impairment
analyses in future periods.
Interest Expense
Our
interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and 2017, is summarized as follows:
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
Interest
expense
|
$585,866
|
$549,871
|
$1,167,699
|
$1,090,512
|
Interest
capitalized
|
(18,231)
|
(67,586)
|
(133,772)
|
(112,136)
|
Net
|
$567,635
|
$482,285
|
$1,033,927
|
$978,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
debt
|
$35,000,000
|
$32,000,000
|
$35,000,000
|
$32,000,000
|
Interest expense
(net of amounts capitalized) increased $85,350 and $55,551 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018 over the same periods in
2017 as a result of higher amounts outstanding under our credit
facility during the three months ended June 30, 2018, in addition
to less capitalized interest in the three months ended June 30,
2018 compared to the same period in 2017.
For a
more complete narrative of interest expense, and terms of our
credit agreement, refer to Note 11 – Debt and Interest
Expense in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Part I of this report.
Income Tax Expense
The
following summarizes our income tax expense (benefit) and effective
tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and
2017:
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
Consolidated
net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
before
income taxes
|
$(4,030,385)
|
$(183,977)
|
$(7,203,306)
|
$2,444,679
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
$-
|
$(20,581)
|
$-
|
$5,950
|
Effective
tax rate
|
0.00%
|
11.19%
|
0.00%
|
0.24%
|
Differences between
the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% in 2018 and 35% in 2017 and
our effective tax rates are due to the tax effects of valuation
allowances recorded against our deferred tax assets and state
income taxes. Refer to Note 13 – Income Taxes in the Notes to
the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I
of this report.
32
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our
primary and potential sources of liquidity include cash on hand,
cash from operating activities, borrowings under our revolving
credit facility, proceeds from the sales of assets, and potential
proceeds from capital market transactions, including the sale of
debt and equity securities. Our cash flows from operating
activities are subject to significant volatility due to changes in
commodity prices, as well as variations in our production. We are
subject to a number of factors that are beyond our control,
including commodity prices, our bank’s determination of our
borrowing base, production declines, and other factors that could
affect our liquidity and ability to continue as a going
concern.
We initiated several strategic
alternatives to remedy our limited liquidity (defined as cash on
hand and undrawn borrowing base), our financial covenant compliance
issues, and to provide us with additional working capital to
develop our existing assets. During the second quarter, we entered
into an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement on May 21, 2018 regarding
our Kern County, California properties, including the sale of all
of our oil and gas properties, fee properties, land, buildings, and
other property and equipment in consideration of $4.7 million in
gross proceeds and the buyer’s assumption of certain plugging
and abandonment liabilities. The transaction is scheduled to close
by August 31, 2018. Upon the closing of the transaction, it is
anticipated that the majority of the proceeds will be applied to
the repayment of borrowings under our credit facility. In addition,
we have reduced our personnel by eight employees since December 31,
2017, a 24% decrease, including five positions that were eliminated
on June 30, 2018. This brings the Company’s headcount to 26
employees as of June 30, 2018. It should also be noted that, during
the second quarter of 2018, we took additional steps to further
reduce our general and administrative costs by reducing
subscriptions, consultants and other non-essential services, as
well as eliminating certain of our capital expenditures planned for
2018.
Additionally, we
plan to take further steps to remedy our limited liquidity, which
may include, but are not limited to, further reducing or
eliminating capital expenditures; entering into additional
commodity derivatives for a portion of our anticipated production;
further reducing general and administrative expenses; selling
certain non-core assets; seeking merger and acquisition related
opportunities; and potentially raising proceeds from capital
markets transactions, including the sale of debt or equity
securities. There can be no assurance that the exploration of
strategic alternatives will result in a transaction or otherwise
remedy our limited liquidity.
The
significant risks and uncertainties described in Note 2 –
Liquidity and Going Concern in the Notes to the Unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I of this report
raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net
cash provided by operating activities was $3,063,719 for the six
months ended June 30, 2018 compared to $2,889,407 in cash provided
during the same period in 2017. This increase was primarily caused
by changes in assets and liabilities, including a decrease in
accounts receivable of $1,339,227 offset by a decrease in revenue
as a result of decreased production.
One of
the primary sources of variability in our cash flows from operating
activities is fluctuations in commodity prices, the impact of which
we partially mitigate by entering into commodity derivatives. Sales
volume changes also impact cash flow. Our cash flows from operating
activities are also dependent on the costs related to continued
operations.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
During
the six months ended June 30, 2018, we had a total of $7,117,895 of
cash used in investing activities. Of that, $4,000,449 related to
the drilling of the State 320 #1H, $2,186,791 related to the
drilling of the Jameson #1 salt water disposal well, $889,108
related to lease acquisition costs for our Permian Basin
acquisition, and realized cash derivatives resulting in a decrease
of $1,189,211, offset by $1,000,000 related to proceeds from the
sale of additional working interests in the Mario
Prospect.
33
During
the six months ended June 30, 2017, we had a total of $2,066,207 of
cash provided by investing activities. Of that, $5,175,063 was
related to proceeds from the sale of the El Halcón field,
offset by $1,001,444 related to the SL 18090 #2 well to establish
production from the SIPH-D1 zone and $744,401 spent on lease
acquisition costs related to our Permian Basis acquisition. In
addition, $844,229 was capitalized G&A related to land,
geological and geophysical costs.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
We
expect to finance future acquisition, development and exploration
activities through available working capital, cash flows from
operating activities, sale of non-strategic assets, and the
possible issuance of additional equity/debt securities. In
addition, we may slow or accelerate the development of our
properties to more closely match our projected cash
flows.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2018, we had net cash provided by
financing activities of $6,265,440. Of that amount, $14,300,000 was
borrowed on our credit facility, $7,000,000 was used for repayments
on our credit facility, $413,612 of treasury stock was repurchased
in connection with the satisfaction of tax obligations upon the
vesting of employees’ restricted stock awards, and $556,898
was used for payments on our insurance financing. In addition, we
paid costs related to a shelf registration statement of $64,050. As
of June 30, 2018, we had a $35,000,000 borrowing base under our
credit facility with the full amount advanced. Other than our
credit facility, we had debt of $94,226 at June 30, 2018 from
installment loans financing oil and natural gas property insurance
premiums. We had a cash balance of $2,348,627 at June 30,
2018.
At June
30, 2017, we had a $40,500,000 conforming borrowing base under our
credit facility with $32,000,000 advanced, leaving a borrowing
capacity of $8,500,000. Other than the credit facility, we had debt
of $86,558 at June 30, 2017 from installment loans financing oil
and natural gas property insurance premiums. We had a cash balance
of $543,095 at June 30, 2017.
Credit Facility
On
October 26, 2016, Yuma and three of its subsidiaries, as the
co-borrowers (collectively, the “Borrowers”), entered
into a credit agreement providing for a $75.0 million three-year
senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Credit
Agreement”) with SocGen, as administrative agent, SG Americas
Securities, LLC, as lead arranger and bookrunner, and the Lenders
signatory thereto (collectively with SocGen, the
“Lender”).
As of
June 30, 2018, the credit facility had a borrowing base of $35.0
million. On July 31, 2018, the Borrowers entered into the Waiver
and Third Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Third
Amendment”) with the Lender. Pursuant to the Third Amendment,
effective as of June 30, 2018, the Borrowers were granted a waiver
for non-compliance from the liquidity covenant to have cash and
cash equivalent investments together with borrowing base
availability under the Credit Agreement of at least $4.0 million.
In addition, as part of the Third Amendment, the Lenders requested
that the Borrowers provide weekly cash flow forecasts and a monthly
accounts payable report to the Lenders. The Third Amendment also
provides for a redetermination of the borrowing base on August 15,
2018.
On May
8, 2018, the Borrowers entered into the Limited Waiver and Second
Amendment to Credit Agreement and Borrowing Base Redetermination
(the “Second Amendment”) with the Lender. Pursuant to
the Second Amendment, which was effective as of March 31, 2018, the
Borrowers were required to enter into additional hedging
arrangements with respect to a substantial portion of the Borrowers
projected production, which the Company complied with in the second
quarter. In addition, in the Second Amendment the terms of the
covenant related to the current ratio were revised to exclude the
current portion of long-term indebtedness outstanding under the
Credit Agreement from current liabilities; and Yuma was required to
provide monthly production and lease operating expense statements
to the Lender. The Second Amendment also provided a waiver of the
financial covenant related to the maximum ratio of total debt to
EBITDAX for the four fiscal quarter period ended March 31, 2018.
The Second Amendment also reduced the borrowing base under the
credit facility to $35.0 million as of May 8, 2018.
34
The
borrowing base under the Credit Agreement is subject to
redetermination on April 1st and October
1st of
each year, as well as special redeterminations described in the
Credit Agreement, in each case which may reduce the amount of the
borrowing base. Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are
guaranteed by our subsidiaries and are secured by liens on
substantially all of our assets, including a mortgage lien on oil
and natural gas properties covering at least 95% of the PV10 value
of the proved oil and gas properties included in the determination
of the borrowing base.
The
amounts borrowed under the Credit Agreement bear annual interest
rates at either (a) the London Interbank Offered Rate
(“LIBOR”) plus 3.00% to 4.00% or (b) the prime lending
rate of SocGen plus 2.00% to 3.00%, depending on the amount
borrowed under the credit facility and whether the loan is drawn in
U.S. dollars or Euro dollars. The interest rate for the credit
facility at June 30, 2018 was 6.10% for LIBOR-based debt and 8.00%
for prime-based debt. Principal amounts outstanding under the
credit facility are due and payable in full at maturity on October
26, 2019. Additional payments due under the Credit Agreement
include paying a commitment fee to the Lender in respect of the
unutilized commitments thereunder. The commitment rate is 0.50% per
year of the unutilized portion of the borrowing base in effect from
time to time. We are also required to pay customary letter of
credit fees.
The
Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants that, among other
things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our ability to
incur additional indebtedness, create liens on assets, make
investments, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, pay
dividends and distributions or repurchase its capital stock, engage
in mergers or consolidations, sell certain assets, sell or discount
any notes receivable or accounts receivable, and engage in certain
transactions with affiliates.
In
addition, the Credit Agreement requires us to maintain the
following financial covenants: a current ratio of not less than 1.0
to 1.0 on the last day of each quarter, a ratio of total debt to
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion,
amortization and exploration expenses (“EBITDAX”) ratio
of not greater than 3.5 to 1.0 for the four fiscal quarters ending
on the last day of the fiscal quarter immediately preceding such
date of determination, and a ratio of EBITDAX to interest expense
of not less than 2.75 to 1.0 for the four fiscal quarters ending on
the last day of the fiscal quarter immediately preceding such date
of determination, and cash and cash equivalent investments together
with borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement of at least
$4.0 million. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative
covenants and defines events of default for credit facilities of
this type, including failure to pay principal or interest, breach
of covenants, breach of representations and warranties, insolvency,
judgment default, and a change of control. Upon the occurrence and
continuance of an event of default, the Lender has the right to
accelerate repayment of the loans and exercise its remedies with
respect to the collateral. As of June 30, 2018, we were not in
compliance with several of our financial covenants under the Credit
Agreement. On July 31, 2018, we received a waiver from our lenders
to our lack of compliance with our liquidity covenant requiring
unrestricted cash and borrowing base availability of at least $4.0
million. The Borrowers’ bank covenant calculations for the
second quarter ended June 30, 2018 are due by August 29, 2018. Upon
submission of these covenant calculations the Borrower intends to
seek a waiver for the covenant violations related to the i) total
debt to EBITDAX covenant, (ii) current ratio covenant, and (iii)
EBITDAX to interest expense covenant for the second quarter. There
can be no assurance that the Lenders will grant these waivers, as
they represent breaches of the terms and conditions of the Credit
Agreement and could result in acceleration of the Company’s
indebtedness, in which case the debt would become immediately due
and payable thereby giving our Lenders various rights and remedies,
including foreclosure. We currently anticipate non-compliance with
various financial covenants at September 30, 2018. See Note 2
– Liquidity and Going Concern in the Notes to the Unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I of this
report.
Hedging Activities
Current Commodity Derivative Contracts
We seek
to reduce our sensitivity to oil and natural gas price volatility
and secure favorable debt financing terms by entering into
commodity derivative transactions which may include fixed price
swaps, price collars, puts, calls and other derivatives. We believe
our hedging strategy should result in greater predictability of
internally generated funds, which in turn can be dedicated to
capital development projects and corporate
obligations.
35
Fair Market Value of Commodity Derivatives
|
June 30, 2018
|
December 31, 2017
|
||
|
Oil
|
Natural Gas
|
Oil
|
Natural Gas
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
Noncurrent
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Liabilities)
assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
$(2,587,919)
|
$(25,771)
|
$(1,198,307)
|
$295,304
|
Noncurrent
|
$(729,764)
|
$(53,574)
|
$(319,104)
|
$(17,302)
|
Assets
and liabilities are netted within each commodity on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the balances without netting,
refer to Note 7 – Commodity Derivative Instruments in the
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included
in Part I of this report.
The
fair market value of our commodity derivative contracts in place at
June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were net liabilities of
$3,397,028 and $1,239,409, respectively.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do
not have any off balance sheet arrangements, special purpose
entities, financing partnerships or guarantees (other than our
guarantee of our wholly owned subsidiary’s credit
facility).
Item 3.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are
a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under
this Item.
Item 4.
Controls
and Procedures.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange
Act reports is accurately recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules
and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and
evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired control objectives, and management
necessarily applied its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As of
June 30, 2018, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision
and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)). Based on
that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2018 our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective.
Changes in internal control over financial
reporting.
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the three month period ended June 30, 2018
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
36
PART II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1.
Legal
Proceedings.
From
time to time, we are a party to various legal proceedings arising
in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these
matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we are not currently a
party to any proceeding that we believe, if determined in a manner
adverse to us, could have a potential material adverse effect on
our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. See
Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to the
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1 of
this report, which is incorporated herein by reference, for a
discussion of our legal proceedings.
Item 1A.
Risk
Factors.
In
addition to the other information set forth in this report, you
should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part 1,
“Item 1A – Risk Factors” in our Annual Report for
the year ended December 31, 2017 on Form 10-K, which could
materially affect our business, financial condition or future
results. The risks described in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K
may not be the only risks facing our Company. There are no material
changes to the risk factors as disclosed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Additional risks
and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently
deem to be immaterial may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2.
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)
|
Average Price Paid Per Share
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
|
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of
Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or
Programs
|
April 2018
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
May 2018
|
10,831
|
$0.40
|
-
|
-
|
June 2018
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1)
All of the shares
were surrendered by employees (via net settlement) in satisfaction
of tax obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock awards. The
acquisition of the surrendered shares was not part of a publicly
announced program to repurchase shares of our common
stock.
Item
3.
Defaults
upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item
4.
Mine
Safety Disclosures.
Not
Applicable.
Item
5.
Other
Information.
None.
37
Item 6.
Exhibits.
EXHIBIT INDEX
FOR
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by
Reference
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Form
|
|
SEC File
No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing
Date
|
|
Filed
Herewith
|
|
Furnished
Herewith
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
101.INS
|
|
XBRL
Instance Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL
Schema Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL
Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL
Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL
Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL
Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
YUMA ENERGY, INC.
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Sam
L. Banks
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Sam L.
Banks
|
|
Date:
August 9, 2018
|
|
Title:
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/
James J. Jacobs
|
|
Date:
August 9, 2018
|
|
Name:
|
|
James
J. Jacobs
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
39