ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP - Quarter Report: 2015 October (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended October 3, 2015

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 000-19406

Zebra Technologies Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

3 Overlook Point, Lincolnshire, IL 60069

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (847) 634-6700

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of October 30, 2015, there were 52,100,278 shares of Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.

Table of Contents

ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

QUARTER ENDED October 3, 2015

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents

ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(Amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Table of Contents

ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

Table of Contents

ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

Management prepared these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for Zebra Technologies Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial information. These financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. Therefore, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

In the opinion of the Company, these interim financial statements include all adjustments (of a normal, recurring nature) necessary to present fairly its consolidated balance sheet as of October 3, 2015, the consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income for the three and nine months ended October 3, 2015 and September 27, 2014, and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended October 3, 2015 and September 27, 2014. These results, however, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.

Reclassifications: Prior-period amounts differ from amounts previously reported because certain immaterial amounts in the prior year’s financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

Note 2 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2015-03 “Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” This guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by this ASU. This standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those annual periods. As permitted, the Company early adopted this ASU beginning in the second quarter of calendar year 2015. The impact of this ASU reduced both long-term assets and long-term debt by $27.2 million at October 3, 2015. It also reduced long-term assets, short-term debt and long-term debt by $29.8 million, $3.3 million, and $26.5 million, respectively, at December 31, 2014. This ASU has no impact on the consolidated statements of operations or cash flows.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15 “Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line of Credit Arrangements- Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting (SEC Update).” This ASU indicates that the guidance in ASU 2015-03, discussed above, does not address presentation or subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. Given the absence of authoritative guidance within ASU 2015-03, the SEC staff has indicated that they would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. However, in conjunction with ASU 2015-03, the Company has elected to present debt issuance costs associated with its line-of-credit arrangement as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of its total debt liability regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement and amortizing these costs using the straight line method over its term. This ASU has no impact on the consolidated statements of operations or cash flows.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments,” which requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. This update is to be applied prospectively and is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 with earlier adoption permitted. The Company elected to early adopt this ASU during the third quarter of 2015. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

7

Table of Contents

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date” which deferred the effective date for all entities by one year so it is now effective for annual periods beginning after December 15,2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. Management is still assessing the impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement.” This update provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license or should be accounted for differently. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The guidance will not change generally accepted accounting principles for a customer’s accounting for service contracts. This update is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Management is still assessing the impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” which changes the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost or net realizable value for entities that measure inventory using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and for interim periods therein. Management is still assessing the impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 3 – Business Combinations

On October 27, 2014, the Company completed its acquisition of the Enterprise Business (“Enterprise”) from Motorola Solutions Inc. (“MSI”) for a purchase price of $3.45 billion (the “Acquisition”). This transaction positions the Company as a leading technology innovator, with the accelerating convergence of mobility, data analytics and cloud computing. It will enable the Company to further sharpen its strategic focus on providing mission-critical solutions for its customers. Certain assets and liabilities historically associated with the Enterprise business were retained by MSI, including MSI’s iDEN infrastructure business. The Acquisition was pursuant to the Master Acquisition Agreement dated April 14, 2014, as amended (the “Master Acquisition Agreement”) and was structured as a combination of stock and asset acquisitions and a merger of certain US entities, resulting in 100% ownership of Enterprise.

The Company financed the Acquisition through a combination of cash on hand and borrowings of $3.25 billion (the “Indebtedness”), including the sale of 7.25% senior notes due 2022 with an aggregate principal amount of $1.05 billion (the “Senior Notes”) and a credit agreement with various lenders that provided a term loan of $2.2 billion (the “Term Loan”) due 2021. See Note 13 Long-Term Debt. Consideration was paid in the form of cash to MSI in the amount of $3.45 billion.

During the nine months ended October 3, 2015, the Company paid additional consideration of $50.9 million to MSI in relation to the opening cash balance and settlement of working capital.

Acquired goodwill represents the consideration paid in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The Company paid this premium for a number of reasons, including acquiring an experienced workforce and enhanced technology capabilities as further described above. Currently, goodwill is assigned to the Enterprise segment. The final valuation of deferred income taxes as well as the assignment of goodwill to reporting units has not been completed as of the date these financial statements are issued.

The purchase price was allocated to identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values resulting in goodwill of $2.335 billion. See Note 7 Goodwill and Other Intangibles. During 2015, the Company adjusted certain preliminary values. The fair value adjustments resulted in a decrease of $14.0 million in assets, a decrease of $6.4 million in liabilities and a corresponding increase to goodwill of $7.6 million. Certain intangible assets including goodwill are denominated in foreign currency and, as such, include the effects of foreign currency translation.

8

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in thousands):

ASU 2015-16 “Business Combinations (Topic 805):Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments”

During September 2015, the Company received a revised valuation report from a third party valuation firm. After reviewing the results of the valuation reports, the Company reduced the value of intangible assets $20.0 million, property and equipment $2.8 million and deferred revenue $0.4 million and increased inventory $1.5 million with a corresponding $21.7 million increase to goodwill. As discussed in Note 2 Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, the Company has adopted ASU 2015-16 “Business Combinations (Topic 805):Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments,” which requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined.

The following table summarizes the fair value balance sheet adjustments recorded during the third quarter of 2015 as well as the amount of adjustments to the current period income statement line items relating to the income effects that would have been recognized in previous periods if the adjustments to provisional amounts were recognized as of the acquisition date (in thousands):

9

Table of Contents

Note 4 – Fair Value Measurements

Financial assets and liabilities are to be measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value hierarchy in accordance with ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements.” Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into the following three broad levels:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets but corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible. In addition, the Company considers counterparty credit risk in the assessment of fair value.

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of October 3, 2015, are classified below (in thousands):

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of December 31, 2014, are classified below (in thousands):

10

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of investments (in thousands):

The carrying value for the Company’s financial instruments are classified as current assets (other than short-term investments) and current liabilities’ approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

Note 5 – Accounts Receivable

The components of accounts receivable, net are as follows (in thousands):

Note 6 – Inventories

The components of inventories, net are as follows (in thousands):

11

Table of Contents

Note 7 – Goodwill and Other Intangibles

In 2014, the Company acquired intangible assets in the amount of $994.4 million for developed technology, customer relationships and trade names associated with the Acquisition. These intangible assets have an estimated useful lives ranging from one to eight years. See Note 3 Business Combinations for specific information regarding the Acquisition.

Other intangibles, net, are as follows (in thousands):

Amortization of intangible assets was $189.8 million and $7.9 million for the nine months ended October 3, 2015 and September 27, 2014, respectively. Certain intangible assets including goodwill are denominated in foreign currency and, as such, include the effects of foreign currency translation.

In 2014, the Company acquired goodwill in the amount of $2.335 billion. See Note 3 Business Combinations for specific information regarding the Acquisition.

In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company acquired all of the outstanding membership interests in Hart Systems, LLC (“Hart”). Hart which is a component within our Retail Solutions Group reporting unit, with total goodwill of $58.6 million as of October 3, 2015, performs its annual impairment test as of the first day of our fourth quarter. During the third quarter of 2015, management identified an indicator of impairment within the Retail Solutions Group reporting unit based on a change in forecasted revenue and earnings results. Based on this event, management performed “step one” of the goodwill impairment test in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, on the Retail Solutions Group as of October 3, 2015. Based on this analysis, management determined that the fair value was less than the carrying value of the net assets for this reporting unit. The Company has not yet completed “step two” of the impairment test, and, as of the filing date of this Form 10-Q, impairment is possible but is not reasonably estimable.

Note 8 – Other Long-Term Assets

Other long-term assets consist of the following (in thousands):

The long-term investments are primarily in venture-capital backed technology companies, and the Company’s ownership interest is between 1.9% to 17.4%.

Note 9 –Accrued Liabilities

The components of accrued liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

12

Table of Contents

Note 10 – Costs Associated with Exit and Restructuring Activities

Total exit and restructuring charges of $40.4 million life to date specific to the Acquisition have been recorded through October 3, 2015: $8.0 million in the Legacy Zebra segment and $32.4 million in the Enterprise segment related to organizational design changes. See Note 3 Business Combinations for specific information regarding the Acquisition.

During the first nine months of 2015, the Company incurred exit and restructuring costs specific to the Acquisition as follows (in thousands):

Exit and restructuring charges for the three and nine month periods ended October 3, 2015 were $1.1 million and $8.0 million for the Legacy Zebra segment and $4.6 million and $26.9 million for the Enterprise segment, respectively. The Company expects additional charges related to the Acquisition through the end of 2016.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company incurred the following exit and restructuring costs related to 2014 organization design changes, Location Solutions business management structure and manufacturing operations relocation and restructuring, which included the Acquisition (in thousands):

A rollforward of the exit and restructuring accruals is as follows (in thousands):

Liabilities related to exit and restructuring activities are included in accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities. Payments of the related, long-term liabilities will be completed by October 2024.

13

Table of Contents

Note 11 – Derivative Instruments

The Company conducts business on a multinational basis in a wide variety of foreign currencies; as such, the Company manages these risks using derivative financial instruments. The exposure to market risk for changes in foreign currency exchange rates arises from cross-border financing activities between subsidiaries and foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. The objective is to preserve the economic value of non-functional currency denominated cash flows. Therefore, the goal is to hedge transaction exposures with natural offsets to the fullest extent possible and, once these opportunities have been exhausted, through foreign exchange forward and option contracts with third parties.

The Company entered into a credit agreement which provides for a term loan of $2.2 billion (“Term Loan”) and a revolving credit facility of $250.0 million (“Revolving Credit Facility”). See Note 13 Long-Term Debt. As such, the Company has exposure to market risk for changes in interest expense calculated off of variable interest rates on the term facility that was used to fund the Acquisition. The Company entered into forward interest rate swaps to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk associated with the Term Loan.

The fair value of the forward starting interest rate swap contracts is estimated using market quoted forward interest rates for the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) at the balance sheet date and the application of such rates subject to the interest rate swap terms. In accordance with ASC 815, “Derivative and Hedging,” the Company recognizes derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measures them at fair value. Gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value are accounted for depending on the use of the derivative and whether it is designated as and qualifies for hedge accounting. The Company’s master netting and other similar arrangements with the respective counterparties allow for net settlement under certain conditions, which are designed to reduce credit risk by permitting net settlement with the same counterparty.

Credit and Market Risk

Financial instruments, including derivatives, expose the Company to counterparty credit risk for nonperformance and to market risk related to interest and currency exchange rates. The Company manages its exposure to counterparty credit risk through specific minimum credit standards, diversification of counterparties, and procedures to monitor concentrations of credit risk. Its counterparties in derivative transactions are commercial banks with significant experience using derivative instruments. The Company monitors the impact of market risk on the fair value and cash flows of its derivative and other financial instruments considering reasonably possible changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates and restricts the use of derivative financial instruments to hedging activities. The Company continually monitors the creditworthiness of its customers to which it grants credit terms in the normal course of business. The terms and conditions of the Company’s credit sales are designed to mitigate or eliminate concentrations of credit risk with any single customer.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

The Company has determined that derivative instruments for hedges that have traded but have not settled are considered Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy, and hedges that have not traded are considered Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Derivative instruments are used to manage risk and are not used for trading or other speculative purposes, nor does the Company use leveraged derivative financial instruments. The foreign currency exchange contracts are valued using broker quotations or market transactions, in either the listed or over-the-counter markets.

Hedging of Net Assets

The Company uses forward contracts to manage exposure related to its British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Czech Koruna, Brazilian Real, Malaysian Ringgit and Euro denominated net assets. Forward contracts typically mature within three months after execution of the contracts. The Company records monetary gains and losses on these contracts and options in income each quarter along with the transaction gains and losses related to its net asset positions, which would ordinarily offset each other.

Summary financial information related to these activities included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations as other (expense) income is as follows (in thousands):

14

Table of Contents

Hedging of Anticipated Sales

The Company manages the exchange rate risk of anticipated Euro denominated sales using put options, forward contracts, and participating forwards. The Company designates these contracts as cash flow hedges which mature within twelve months after the execution of the contracts. Gains and losses on these contracts are deferred in other comprehensive income until the contracts are settled and the hedged sales are realized. The deferred gain or loss will then be reported as an increase or decrease to sales.

Summary financial information related to the cash flow hedges within comprehensive income is as follows (in thousands):

Summary financial information related to the cash flow hedges of future revenues is as follows (in thousands, except percentages):

15

Table of Contents

Forward Contracts

The Company records its forward contracts at fair value on its consolidated balance sheets as a current asset or liability, depending upon the fair value calculation as detailed in Note 4 Fair Value Measurements. The amounts recorded on the consolidated balance sheets are as follows (in thousands):

Forward Interest Rate Swaps

The forward interest rate swaps hedge the interest rate risk associated with the variable interest payments on the Company’s Term Loan that was used to fund the Acquisition.

In June 2014, the Company entered into a commitment letter for a new variable rate credit facility to fund the Acquisition and also entered into two tranches of floating-to-fixed forward interest rate swaps (“Original Swaps”). These Original Swaps were used to economically hedge interest rate risk associated with the variable rate commitment until July 30, 2014, and as such, changes in their fair value were recognized in earnings in other (expense) income. Effective July 30, 2014, the Original Swaps were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate exposure associated with variability in future cash flows on the variable rate commitment. On October 27, 2014, the variable rate commitment was funded and the Company entered into a Term Loan that accrues interest at a variable rate of LIBOR (subject to a floor of 0.75% per annum) plus a margin of 4.0%. On October 30, 2014, the Company discontinued hedge accounting for the Original Swaps due to the syndication of the Original Swaps to a group of commercial banks (“Syndicated Swaps”), which resulted in their termination. The changes in fair value of the Original Swaps between July 30, 2014 and their termination were included in other comprehensive (loss) income and any ineffectiveness was insignificant. The amounts included in other comprehensive (loss) income will be amortized to earnings in other (expense) income as the interest payments under the Term Loan affect earnings. The Syndicated Swaps were not designated as hedges and the changes in fair value are recognized in earnings in other (expense) income.

On November 20, 2014, the Company entered into additional floating-to-fixed forward starting interest rate swaps (“New Swaps”) and designated these as cash flow hedges of interest rate exposure associated with variability in future cash flows on its Term Loan. To offset the impact to earnings of the changes in fair value of the Syndicated Swaps, the Company also entered into fixed-to-floating forward starting interest rate swaps (“Offsetting Swaps”), which were not designated in a hedging relationship and the changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings in other income (expense). Changes in fair value of the New Swaps that are designated as cash flow hedges and are effective at offsetting variability in the future cash flows on the Company’s Term Loan are recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income. Ineffectiveness is immediately recognized in earnings.

The balance sheet position of the forward interest rate swaps designated in a hedge relationship is as follows (in thousands):

The forward interest rate swaps not designated in a hedging relationship are recorded in a net liability position of $11.2 million as of October 3, 2015 and $14.5 million December 31, 2014 in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

16

Table of Contents

The gross and net amounts offset at October 3, 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

The volume of the New Swaps designated in a hedge relationship is as follows (in thousands):

The New Swaps, each with a term of one year, are designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate exposure associated with variability in future cash flows on the Term Loan. The notional amount of the designated New Swaps effective in each year of the cash flow hedge relationships does not exceed the principal amount of the Term Loan which is hedged. The New Swaps have the following notional amounts per year (in thousands):

The gain (loss) recognized on the forward interest rate swaps not designated in a hedge relationship is as follows (in thousands):

The loss recognized in other comprehensive unrealized loss on the forward interest rate swaps designated in a hedging relationship is as follows (in thousands):

No significant (loss) gain was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income into interest expense on the forward interest rate swaps designated in a hedging relationship during the three and nine month periods ended October 3, 2015 and September 27, 2014.

17

Table of Contents

At October 3, 2015, the Company expects that approximately $10.5 million in losses on the forward interest rate swaps designated in a hedging relationship will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings during the next four quarters.

Note 12 – Warranty

In general, the Company provides warranty coverage of one year on Enterprise’s mobile computers and WLAN products. Advanced data capture products are warranted from one to five years, depending on the product. Printers are warranted for one year against defects in material and workmanship. Thermal printheads are warranted for six months and batteries are warranted for one year. Battery-based products, such as location tags, are covered by a ninety-day warranty. A provision for warranty expense is recorded at the time of sale and is adjusted quarterly based on historical warranty experience.

The following table is a summary of the Company’s accrued warranty obligation (in thousands):

Note 13 – Long-Term Debt

Private Offering

On October 15, 2014, the Company completed a private offering of $1.05 billion aggregate principal of 7.25% Senior Notes due October 15, 2022. The Senior Notes yielded an effective interest rate of 7.61% at issuance. The Senior Notes are governed by the terms of an indenture, dated as of October 15, 2014, by and among the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable in cash on April 15 and October 15 of each year.

The Indenture covering the Senior Notes contains certain various restrictive and affirmative covenants. In addition, the Senior Notes are guaranteed jointly and severally, on a senior and unsecured basis by the Company’s direct and indirect wholly-owned existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions.

Credit Facilities

Borrowings under the Term Loan bear interest at a variable rate plus an applicable margin, subject to an all-in floor of 4.75%. As of October 3, 2015, the Term Loan interest rate was 4.75%. Interest payments are payable quarterly. The Company has entered into interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk on its long-term debt. See Note 11 Derivative Instruments.

The credit agreement requires the Company to prepay the Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility, under certain circumstances or transactions defined in the credit agreement. Also, the Company may make optional prepayments of the Term Loans, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. The Company made such optional principal prepayments of $130.0 million during the nine months ended October 3, 2015. On November 3, 2015, the Company made an additional optional principal prepayment of $20.0 million. Unless satisfied by further optional prepayments, the Company is required to make a scheduled principal payment of $2.05 billion due on October 27, 2021.

The Revolving Credit Facility is available for working capital and other general corporate purposes including letters of credit. The amount (including letters of credit) shall not exceed $250.0 million. As of October 3, 2015, the Company had established letters of credit amounting to $3.2 million, which reduced funds available for other borrowings under the agreement to $246.8 million. The Revolving Credit Facility will mature and the commitments thereunder will terminate on October 27, 2019.

Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a variable rate plus an applicable margin. As of October 3, 2015, the Revolving Credit Facility interest rate was 3.25%. Interest payments are payable quarterly. As of October 3, 2015 and December 31 2014, the Company did not have any borrowings against the Revolving Credit Facility.

18

Table of Contents

The Credit Facilities contains various restrictive and affirmative covenants and are collateralized by a security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets as defined in the security agreement and guaranteed by its direct and indirect wholly-owned existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions.

The following table summarizes the carrying value of the Company’s debt (in thousands):

The estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt approximated $3.2 billion at October 3, 2015 and $3.3 billion at December 31, 2014. These fair value amounts represent the estimated value at which the Company’s lenders could trade its debt within the financial markets and does not represent the settlement value of these long-term debt liabilities to the Company. The fair value of the long-term debt will continue to vary each period based on fluctuations in market interest rates, as well as changes to the Company’s credit ratings. This methodology resulted in a Level 2 classification in the fair value hierarchy.

Note 14 – Contingencies

The Company is subject to a variety of investigations, claims, suits and other legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business, including but not limited to, intellectual property, employment, tort and breach of contract matters. The Company currently believes that the outcomes of such proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on its business, cash flows, financial position, or results of operations. Any legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties, and the Company’s view of these matters and its potential effects may change in the future.

In re Symbol Technologies, Inc. Securities Litigation

In connection with the Acquisition, the Company acquired Symbol Technologies, Inc., a subsidiary of Motorola Solutions. A putative federal class action lawsuit, Waring v. Symbol Technologies, Inc., et al., was filed on August 16, 2005 against Symbol Technologies, Inc. and two of its former officers in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York by Robert Waring. After the filing of the Waring action, several additional purported class actions were filed against Symbol and the same former officers making substantially similar allegations (collectively, the “New Class Actions”). The Waring action and the New Class Actions were consolidated for all purposes and on April 26, 2006, the Court appointed the Iron Workers Local # 580 Pension Fund as lead plaintiff and approved its retention of lead counsel on behalf of the putative class. On August 30, 2006, the lead plaintiff filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the “Amended Complaint”), and named additional former officers and directors of Symbol as defendants. The lead plaintiff alleges that the defendants misrepresented the effectiveness of Symbol’s internal controls and forecasting processes, and that, as a result, all of the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the individual defendants violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Amended Complaint alleges that it was damaged by the decline in the price of Symbol’s stock following certain purported corrective disclosures and seeks unspecified damages. By orders entered on June 25 and August 3, 2015, the court granted lead plaintiff’s motion for class certification, certifying a class of investors that includes those that purchased Symbol common stock between April 29, 2003 and August 1, 2005. The parties have substantially completed fact discovery. Pursuant to the Court’s current scheduling order, expert discovery is expected to be completed by January 15, 2016, and dispositive motions are to be filed by February 12, 2016. The Company establishes an accrued liability for loss contingencies related to legal matters when the loss is both probable and estimable. In addition, for some matters for which a loss is probable or reasonably possible, an estimate of the amount of loss or range of loss is not possible, and we may be unable to estimate the possible loss or range of losses that could potentially result from the application of non-monetary remedies. Currently, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the amount of reasonably possible losses for this matter.

19

Table of Contents

Note 15 – Earnings per Share

Earnings per share were computed as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Anti-dilutive securities consist primarily of stock appreciation rights (SARs) with an exercise price greater than the average market closing price of the Class A common stock.

Due to a net loss for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2015, options, awards and warrants were anti-dilutive and therefore excluded from the earnings per share calculation. These excluded outstanding options, awards and warrants are as follows:

Note 16 – Share-Based Compensation

The Company has share-based compensation and employee stock purchase plans under which shares of the Company’s common stock are available for future grants and sales. The Company recognizes compensation costs using the straight-line method over the vesting period upon grant of up to five years.

Pre-tax share-based compensation expense recognized in the statements of operations was $26.4 million and $10.3 million for the nine-month periods ended October 3, 2015 and September 27, 2014, respectively. Tax related benefits of $8.9 million and $3.5 million were also recognized for the nine-month periods ended October 3, 2015 and September 27, 2014, respectively.

The Company issued 458,823 and 564,815 shares in connection with share-based compensation and employee stock purchase programs during the nine months ended October 3, 2015 and September 27, 2014 respectively.

20

Table of Contents

The fair value of share-based compensation is estimated on the date of grant using a binomial model. Volatility is based on an average of the implied volatility in the open market and the annualized volatility of the Company’s stock prices over its entire stock history. Stock option grants in the table below include both stock options, all of which were non-qualified, and stock appreciation rights (SARs) that will be settled in the Company stock or cash. Restricted stock grants are valued at the market closing price on the grant date. The following table shows the weighted-average assumptions used for grants of SARs as well as the fair value of the grants based on those assumptions:

Stock option activity was as follows:

SAR activity was as follows: