ZION OIL & GAS INC - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
MARK
ONE
x Quarterly Report
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the
Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2010; or
o Transition Report
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the
transition period from
________
to ________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER:
001-33228
ZION
OIL & GAS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
20-0065053
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
6510
Abrams Rd., Suite 300
Dallas,
Texas
|
75231
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
Zip
Code
|
(214)
221-4610
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-accelerated
filer o (Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of
August 9, 2010, Zion Oil & Gas, Inc. had outstanding 21,220,515 shares of
common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
PART
1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page
|
|
Item
1 - Financial Statements – Unaudited
|
|
Balance
Sheets - June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
|
1
|
Statements
of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
and the period from April 6, 2000 (inception) to June 30,
2010
|
2
|
Statements
of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2010
and the period from April 6, 2000 (inception) to June 30,
2010
|
3
|
Statements
of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the
period from April 6, 2000 (inception) to June 30, 2010
|
13
|
Notes
to Unaudited Interim Financial Statements
|
15
|
Item
2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
|
34
|
Item
3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
40
|
Item
4 - Controls and Procedures
|
41
|
PART
II — OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1 – Legal Proceedings
|
41
|
Item
A – Risk Factors
|
41
|
Item
2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
41
|
Item
3 - Defaults upon Senior Securities
|
42
|
Item
4 – (Removed and Reserved)
|
42
|
Item
5 - Other Information
|
42
|
Item
6 – Exhibits
|
42
|
SIGNATURES
|
43
|
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Balance
Sheets (unaudited) as
of
|
June 30
|
December 31
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
|||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
9,579 | 20,734 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
645 | 647 | ||||||
Deferred
offering costs
|
123 | - | ||||||
Tax
refunds receivable
|
614 | 961 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
10,961 | 22,342 | ||||||
Unproved
oil and gas properties, full cost method (see Note 2A)
|
14,420 | 23,759 | ||||||
Property
and equipment at cost
|
||||||||
Net
of accumulated depreciation of $97,200 and $82,000, at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 respectively
|
164 | 78 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
||||||||
Assets
held for severance benefits
|
62 | 46 | ||||||
Total
other assets
|
62 | 46 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
25,607 | 46,225 | ||||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
769 | 159 | ||||||
Asset
retirement obligation
|
50 | 50 | ||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
201 | 1,915 | ||||||
Deferred
officers compensation
|
246 | 477 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
1,266 | 2,601 | ||||||
Provision
for severance pay
|
294 | 185 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
1,560 | 2,786 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies (see Note 6)
|
||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
||||||||
Common
stock, par value $.01; 50,000,000 shares authorized:
|
||||||||
2010
– 18,749,398 shares and 2009 – 18,706,601 shares
|
||||||||
issued
and outstanding
|
187 | 187 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
77,575 | 72,081 | ||||||
Deficit
accumulated in development stage
|
(53,715 | ) | (28,829 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
24,047 | 43,439 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
25,607 | 46,225 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited interim financial
statements.
1
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statements
of Operations (unaudited)
|
Period from
|
||||||||||||||||||||
April 6, 2000
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For the three month period
|
For the six month period
|
(inception) to
|
||||||||||||||||||
ended June 30
|
ended June 30
|
June 30
|
||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Legal
and professional
|
143 | 233 | 495 | 467 | 6,450 | |||||||||||||||
Salaries
|
753 | 900 | 1,439 | 1,400 | 9,507 | |||||||||||||||
Other
|
526 | 214 | 845 | 475 | 5,843 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment
of unproved oil and gas properties
|
22,022 | - | 22,022 | - | 31,516 | |||||||||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(23,444 | ) | (1,347 | ) | (24,801 | ) | (2,342 | ) | (53,316 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
expense, net
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Termination
of initial public offering
|
- | - | - | - | (527 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
- | - | - | 76 | 80 | |||||||||||||||
Interest
(expense) income, net
|
(82 | ) | 15 | (85 | ) | 18 | 48 | |||||||||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(23,526 | ) | (1,332 | ) | (24,886 | ) | (2,248 | ) | (53,715 | ) | ||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(23,526 | ) | (1,332 | ) | (24,886 | ) | (2,248 | ) | (53,715 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
loss per share of common stock -
basic
and diluted (in US$)
|
(1.25 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (1.33 | ) | (0.18 | ) | (6.39 | ) | ||||||||||
Weighted-average
shares outstanding –
basic
and diluted (in thousands)
|
18,749 | 12,251 | 18,740 | 12,222 | 8,400 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited interim financial
statements.
2
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statement
of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (unaudited)
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock
|
Common Stock
|
paid-in
|
in development
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
capital
|
stage
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
Thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances
April 6, 2000
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issued
for cash ($0.001 per share)
|
- | - | 2,400 | * - | 2 | - | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants in a private offering ($1 per
share)
|
- | - | 100 | * - | 100 | - | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Costs
associated with the issuance of shares
|
- | - | - | - | (24 | ) | - | (24 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Waived
interest on conversion of debt
|
- | - | - | - | * - | - | * - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Value
of warrants granted to employees
|
- | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2000
|
- | - | 2,500 | * - | 80 | (5 | ) | 75 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants in a private offering in January 2001 ($1 per
share)
|
- | - | 135 | * - | 135 | - | 135 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants in a private offering which
closed in September 2001 ($1 per share)
|
- | - | 125 | * - | 125 | - | 125 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment
of accounts payable through issuance of shares and
warrants
|
- | - | 40 | * - | 40 | - | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment
of note payable through issuance of shares and warrants
|
- | - | 25 | * - | 25 | - | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants in a private offering which closed in November 2001
($1 per share)
|
- | - | 175 | * - | 175 | - | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Costs
associated with the issuance of shares
|
- | - | - | - | (85 | ) | - | (85 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Waived
interest on conversion of debt
|
- | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Value
of warrants granted to employees
|
- | - | - | - | 37 | - | 37 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Value
of warrants granted to directors and consultants
|
- | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | (207 | ) | (207 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2001
|
- | - | 3,000 | * - | 536 | (212 | ) | 324 |
* Represents
an amount less than US$ 1 thousand.
3
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statement
of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
(unaudited)(cont’d)
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock
|
Common Stock
|
paid-in
|
in development
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
capital
|
stage
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
Thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in par value of common shares from $ 0.0001 per share to $0.01 per
share
|
- | - | - | 30 | (30 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants in a private offering which closed in January 2002
($1 per share)
|
- | - | 20 | * - | 20 | - | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants in a private offering which closed in November 2002
($10 per share)
|
25 | * - | 22 | * - | 254 | - | 254 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment
of accounts payable through issuance of preferred shares and
warrants
|
13 | * - | - | - | 127 | - | 127 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment
of accounts payable through issuance of common shares and
warrants
|
- | - | 111 | 1 | 131 | - | 132 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment
of note payable through issuance of shares and warrants
|
5 | * - | - | - | 50 | - | 50 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment
of accounts payable to employee through issuance of shares upon exercise
of warrants
|
- | - | 400 | 4 | 76 | - | 80 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Costs
associated with the issuance of shares
|
- | - | - | - | (160 | ) | - | (160 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Waived
interest on conversion of debt
|
- | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred
financing costs on debt conversions / modifications
|
- | - | - | - | 21 | - | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Value
of warrants granted to employees
|
- | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Value
of warrants granted to directors and consultants
|
- | - | - | - | 13 | - | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | (403 | ) | (403 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2002
|
43 | * - | 3,553 | 35 | 1,042 | (615 | ) | 462 |
* Represents
an amount less than US$ 1 thousand.
4
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statement
of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (unaudited) (cont’d)
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock
|
Common Stock
|
paid-in
|
in development
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
capital
|
stage
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
Thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares in connection with executive employment
|
- | - | 50 | 1 | 49 | - | 50 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of share on warrants exercise
|
- | - | 165 | 2 | 31 | - | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of dividend shares to record holders as of December 31,
2002
|
4 | * - | - | - | * - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants in a private offering which closed in February 2003
($10 per share):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for
cash consideration
|
10 | * - | - | - | 105 | - | 105 | |||||||||||||||||||||
for
reduction of accounts payable
|
5 | * - | - | - | 45 | - | 45 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants as compensation for extension of $100,000 line of
credit
|
1 | * - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment
of account payable through issuance of shares and warrants
|
* - | * - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of preferred shares to common shares in reincorporation
merger
|
(63 | ) | * - | 763 | 7 | (7 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares in a private offering which closed in July 2003 ($3 per
share):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for
cash consideration
|
- | - | 33 | * - | 99 | - | 99 | |||||||||||||||||||||
for
reduction of accounts payable
|
- | - | 3 | * - | 9 | - | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares upon exercise of warrants:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for
cash consideration
|
- | - | 25 | * - | 25 | - | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||
for
reduction of accounts payable
|
- | - | 124 | 1 | 142 | - | 143 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares upon exercise of warrants for cash consideration
|
- | - | 63 | 1 | 82 | - | 83 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment
of account payable through issuance of shares
|
- | - | 80 | 1 | 139 | - | 140 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Costs
associated with the issuance of shares
|
- | - | - | - | (58 | ) | - | (58 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Value
of warrants granted to employees
|
- | - | - | - | 47 | - | 47 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred
financing costs on debt conversions / modifications
|
- | - | - | - | (10 | ) | - | (10 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | (873 | ) | (873 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2003
|
- | - | 4,859 | 48 | 1,751 | (1,488 | ) | 311 |
* Represents
an amount less than US$ 1 thousand.
5
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statement
of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (unaudited)(cont’d)
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
paid-in
|
in development
|
||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amounts
|
capital
|
stage
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares on warrants exercise
|
123 | 1 | 183 | - | 184 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants in a private offering
|
251 | 3 | 1,002 | - | 1,005 | |||||||||||||||
Payment
of officer salaries through issuance of shares and
warrants
|
46 | 1 | 184 | - | 185 | |||||||||||||||
Payment
of accounts payable to officers and consultants upon exercise of
warrants
|
80 | 1 | 99 | - | 100 | |||||||||||||||
Payment
of director honorariums through issuance of shares and
warrants
|
11 | * - | 45 | - | 45 | |||||||||||||||
Payment
of account payable through issuance of shares and warrants
|
13 | * - | 50 | - | 50 | |||||||||||||||
Payment
of bridge loan through issuance of shares and warrants
|
125 | 1 | 499 | - | 500 | |||||||||||||||
Payment
of bridge loan interest and commitment fee through issuance of shares and
warrants
|
8 | * - | 30 | - | 30 | |||||||||||||||
Payment
of bridge loan finders fee through issuance of shares and
warrants
|
2 | * - | 7 | - | 7 | |||||||||||||||
Payment
of service bonus through issuance of shares and warrants
|
20 | * - | 20 | - | 20 | |||||||||||||||
Costs
associated with the issuance of shares
|
- | - | (59 | ) | - | (59 | ) | |||||||||||||
Value
of warrants granted to employees
|
- | - | 41 | - | 41 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred
financing costs on debt conversions / modifications
|
- | - | 30 | - | 30 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (1,737 | ) | (1,737 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2004
|
5,538 | 55 | 3,882 | (3,225 | ) | 712 |
* Represents
an amount less than US$ 1 thousand.
6
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
|
Statement
of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (unaudited) (cont’d)
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
paid-in
|
in development
|
||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amounts
|
capital
|
stage
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares on warrants exercised:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For
cash
|
493 | 5 | 872 | - | 877 | |||||||||||||||
For
payment of deferred officer salaries
|
17 | * - | 21 | - | 21 | |||||||||||||||
For
exchange of shares of common stock
|
120 | 1 | (1 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants in a private offering that closed in March
2005:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For
cash
|
519 | 5 | 2,070 | - | 2,075 | |||||||||||||||
For
payment of deferred officer salaries
|
10 | * - | 40 | - | 40 | |||||||||||||||
For
payment of accounts payable
|
6 | * - | 25 | - | 25 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants in a private offering that closed in June
2005:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For
cash
|
259 | 3 | 1,292 | - | 1,295 | |||||||||||||||
For
payment of directors honoraria
|
14 | * - | 70 | - | 70 | |||||||||||||||
For
payment of accounts payable
|
3 | * - | 15 | - | 15 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares in a private offering that closed in October
2005:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For
cash
|
584 | 6 | 2,914 | - | 2,920 | |||||||||||||||
For
payment of deferred officer salaries
|
40 | * - | 200 | - | 200 | |||||||||||||||
For
payment of accounts payable
|
22 | * - | 110 | - | 110 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares in a private offering that closed in December
2005
|
80 | 1 | 439 | - | 440 | |||||||||||||||
Shares
to be issued for services provided by director
|
- | - | 42 | - | 42 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of warrants and options granted to employees
|
- | - | 216 | - | 216 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of warrants granted to directors and consultants
|
- | - | 16 | - | 16 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred
financing costs on debt conversions /modifications
|
- | - | 44 | - | 44 | |||||||||||||||
Costs
associated with the issuance of shares
|
- | - | (275 | ) | - | (275 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (1,605 | ) | (1,605 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2005
|
7,705 | 76 | 11,992 | (4,830 | ) | 7,238 |
* Represents
an amount less than US$ 1 thousand.
7
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statement of Changes in Stockholders'
Equity (unaudited) (cont’d)
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
paid-in
|
in development
|
||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amounts
|
capital
|
stage
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares on warrants exercised:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For
cash
|
253 | 3 | 1,151 | - | 1,154 | |||||||||||||||
For
debt
|
60 | 1 | 276 | - | 277 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants in private offering closings in first quarter
2006:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For
cash
|
66 | 1 | 362 | - | 363 | |||||||||||||||
For
payment of accounts
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Payable
|
3 | * - | 14 | - | 14 | |||||||||||||||
Shares
issued for services provided by officer
|
200 | 2 | 248 | - | 250 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares and warrants in a private offering that closed in September 2006
for cash
|
23 | * - | 126 | - | 126 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of options granted to employees
|
- | - | 162 | - | 162 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of warrants granted to underwriter
|
- | - | 20 | - | 20 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of shares gifted to directors, employees and service
providers
|
- | - | 147 | - | 147 | |||||||||||||||
Costs
associated with the issuance of shares
|
- | - | (681 | ) | - | (681 | ) | |||||||||||||
Funds
received from public offering for subscription shares:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For
cash
|
410 | 4 | 2,867 | - | 2,871 | |||||||||||||||
For
debt
|
27 | * - | 188 | - | 188 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (2,510 | ) | (2,510 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2006
|
8,747 | 87 | 16,872 | (7,340 | ) | 9,619 |
* Represents
an amount less than US$ 1 thousand.
8
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statement
of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (unaudited)
(cont’d)
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
paid-in
|
in development
|
||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amounts
|
capital
|
stage
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
Funds
received from public offering for subscription shares:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For
cash
|
1,336 | 14 | 9,338 | - | 9,352 | |||||||||||||||
For
debt
|
33 | * - | 235 | - | 235 | |||||||||||||||
Compensation
in respect of shares previously issued for services provided by
officer
|
- | - | 208 | - | 208 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of options granted to employees
|
- | - | 337 | - | 337 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of warrants granted to underwriter
|
- | - | 79 | - | 79 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of shares granted to employees
|
5 | *- | 25 | - | 25 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of shares gifted to employees
|
- | - | 7 | - | 7 | |||||||||||||||
Costs
associated with the issuance of shares
|
- | - | (1,027 | ) | - | (1,027 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (13,047 | ) | (13,047 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2007
|
10,121 | 101 | 26,074 | (20,387 | ) | 5,788 |
* Represents
an amount less than US$ 1 thousand.
9
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statement of Changes in Stockholders'
Equity (unaudited) (cont’d)
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
paid-in
|
in
development
|
||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amounts
|
capital
|
stage
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Thousands
|
US$
thousands
|
US$
thousands
|
US$
thousands
|
US$
thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
Funds
received from Unit Offering
for subscription shares:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For
cash
|
405 | 4 | 4,040 | - | 4,044 | |||||||||||||||
For
debt
|
12 | *- | 120 | - | 120 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of warrants granted to employees
|
- | - | 266 | - | 266 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of options granted to directors and consultants
|
- | - | 44 | - | 44 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of shares granted to employees
|
4 | *- | 25 | - | 25 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of shares gifted to employees
|
- | - | 101 | - | 101 | |||||||||||||||
Costs
associated with the issuance of shares
|
- | - | (815 | ) | - | (815 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (4,018 | ) | (4,018 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2008
|
10,542 | 105 | 29,855 | (24,405 | ) | 5,555 |
* Represents
an amount less than US$ 1 thousand.
10
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statement of Changes in Stockholders'
Equity (unaudited) (cont’d)
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
paid-in
|
in development
|
||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amounts
|
capital
|
stage
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
Funds
received from Unit Offering for subscription shares:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For
cash
|
237 | 3 | 2,370 | - | 2,373 | |||||||||||||||
For
debt
|
13 | *- | 126 | - | 126 | |||||||||||||||
Funds
received from Rights Offering
|
4,200 | 42 | 20,958 | - | 21,000 | |||||||||||||||
Funds
received from Second Rights Offering
|
3,600 | 36 | 17,964 | - | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||
Funds
received from warrant exercises
|
59 | 1 | 414 | - | 415 | |||||||||||||||
Underwriter
warrants exercised in cashless exercise
|
13 | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Director
warrants and options exercised in cashless exercises
|
37 | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Value
of options granted to employees
|
- | - | 494 | - | 494 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of options granted to directors and consultants
|
- | - | 328 | - | 328 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of shares granted to consultants for services
|
5 | *- | 46 | - | 46 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of shares gifted to employees
|
- | - | 4 | - | 4 | |||||||||||||||
Costs
associated with the issuance of shares
|
- | - | (478 | ) | - | (478 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (4,424 | ) | (4,424 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2009
|
18,706 | 187 | 72,081 | (28,829 | ) | 43,439 |
* Represents
an amount less than US$ 1 thousand.
11
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statement
of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
(unaudited) (cont’d)
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
paid-in
|
in development
|
||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amounts
|
capital
|
stage
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
Funds
received from warrant exercises
|
*- | *- | 3 |
-
|
3 | |||||||||||||||
Funds
received from option exercises
|
40 | *- | *- | - | *- | |||||||||||||||
Funds
received from Rights Offering
|
- | - | 5,042 | - | 5,042 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of shares granted to consultants for services
|
2 | *- | 15 | - | 15 | |||||||||||||||
Value
of options or warrants granted to employees
|
- | - | 447 | - | 447 | |||||||||||||||
Costs
associated with the issuance of shares
|
- | - | (13 | ) | - | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (24,886 | ) | (24,886 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balances
as of June 30, 2010
|
18,748 | 187 | 77,575 | (53,715 | ) | 24,047 |
* Represents
an amount less than US$ 1 thousand.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial
statements.
12
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statement
of Cash Flows (unaudited)
|
Period from
|
||||||||||||
April 6, 2000
|
||||||||||||
For the six month
|
(inception) to
|
|||||||||||
period ended June 30
|
June 30
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(24,886 | ) | (2,248 | ) | (53,715 | ) | ||||||
Adjustments
required to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
||||||||||||
used
in operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
15 | 10 | 103 | |||||||||
Officer,
director and other fees, paid via common stock
|
15 | 10 | 2,330 | |||||||||
Cost
of options or warrants issued to employees, directors &
others
|
447 | 682 | 2,553 | |||||||||
Interest
paid through issuance of common stock
|
- | - | 17 | |||||||||
Write-off
of costs associated with public offering
|
- | - | 507 | |||||||||
Loss
on disposal of equipment
|
- | - | 4 | |||||||||
Impairment
of unproved oil and gas properties
|
22,022 | - | 31,516 | |||||||||
Asset
retirement obligation
|
- | - | 50 | |||||||||
Change
in assets and liabilities, net:
|
||||||||||||
Decrease
in inventories
|
- | - | 150 | |||||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
2 | (113 | ) | (645 | ) | |||||||
Increase
in deferred offering costs
|
(123 | ) | 14 | (123 | ) | |||||||
Tax
refunds receivable
|
347 | (982 | ) | (614 | ) | |||||||
Provision
for severance pay, net
|
93 | 34 | 232 | |||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
610 | 29 | 1,417 | |||||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
(1,714 | ) | 1,965 | 201 | ||||||||
Increase
(decrease) in deferred officers' compensation
|
(231 | ) | (1,219 | ) | 486 | |||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(3,403 | ) | (1,818 | ) | (15,531 | ) | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
||||||||||||
Acquisition
of property and equipment
|
(101 | ) | (3 | ) | (269 | ) | ||||||
Investment
in unproved oil and gas properties
|
(12,683 | ) | (4,603 | ) | (46,086 | ) | ||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(12,784 | ) | (4,606 | ) | (46,355 | ) | ||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
||||||||||||
Deferred
financing costs on debt conversions and modification
|
- | - | 89 | |||||||||
Loan
proceeds – related party
|
- | - | 259 | |||||||||
Loan
principal repayments – related party
|
- | - | (259 | ) | ||||||||
Loan
proceeds – other
|
- | - | 500 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of stock
|
5,045 | 23,738 | 74,652 | |||||||||
Costs
associated with the issuance of shares
|
(13 | ) | (365 | ) | (3,776 | ) | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
5,032 | 23,373 | 71,465 | |||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(11,155 | ) | 16,949 | 9,579 | ||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents – beginning of period
|
20,734 | 1,726 | - | |||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents– end of period
|
9,579 | 18,675 | 9,579 |
13
Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statement
of Cash Flows (unaudited)
(cont'd)
|
Period from
|
||||||||||||
April 6, 2000
|
||||||||||||
For the six month
|
(inception) to
|
|||||||||||
period ended June 30
|
June 30
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||
Supplemental
information
|
||||||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
14 | 4 | 78 | |||||||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Payment
of accounts payable through issuance of common stock
|
- | 6 | 575 | |||||||||
Payment
of accounts payable through issuance of note payable
|
- | - | 35 | |||||||||
Financing
costs paid through issuance of common stock
|
- | - | 25 | |||||||||
Increase
in accounts payable for financing costs
|
- | - | 382 | |||||||||
Waived
interest on debt conversions
|
- | - | 4 | |||||||||
Shares
issued for debt conversion
|
- | 120 | 940 | |||||||||
Value
of warrants and options granted to directors and
consultants
|
328 | |||||||||||
Value
of warrants and options granted to employees
|
354 | |||||||||||
Value
of warrants granted to underwriters
|
- | - | 99 | |||||||||
Value
of shares gifted to directors, employees and service
providers
|
- | 4 | ||||||||||
Deferred
financing costs
|
- | - | 85 | |||||||||
Transfer
of inventory to oil and gas properties
|
- | - | 150 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited interim financial
statements.
14
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
1 - Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
|
A.
|
Nature
of Operations
|
Effective
July 9, 2003, Zion Oil & Gas, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Zion Florida”)
was merged into its wholly owned Delaware subsidiary, Zion Oil & Gas, Inc.
(sometimes referred to herein as “we,” “our,” “us,” “Zion,” or the “Company,”),
the purpose of which was solely to reincorporate from Florida to Delaware in
anticipation of a public offering. Upon the reincorporation, all the
outstanding shares of common stock in Zion Florida were converted into common
stock, par value $0.01 (the “Common Stock”), of the Company on a one-to-one
basis and all the outstanding shares of preferred stock in Zion Florida were
converted into Common Stock of the Company at the ratio of twelve shares of
common stock for each share of preferred stock. All of the
outstanding warrants and options of Zion Florida were converted into equivalent
warrants and options of the Company.
The
Company currently holds two petroleum exploration licenses and one preliminary
exclusive petroleum exploration permit with priority rights under the Israeli
Petroleum Law, 5712-1952 (the “Petroleum Law”). Zion’s petroleum rights extend
from the Mediterranean at Caesarea across the Carmel Mountains to Megiddo and
through to the Jordan River immediately south of the Sea of
Galilee. Zion’s total petroleum exploration rights area is
approximately 327,100 acres. Below is a summary of the licenses and
the permit.
Licenses
(1) The
“Asher-Menashe License” covers an area of approximately 78,824 acres located on
the Israeli coastal plain and the Mt. Carmel range between Caesarea in the south
and Haifa in the north. The Asher-Menashe License had an initial three-year term
that ran from June 10, 2007 through June 9, 2010, and as of May 17, 2010, has
been extended for an additional one-year period ending June 9,
2011. At the option of the Israeli Petroleum Commissioner, the
Asher-Menashe License may be extended for additional one-year periods up to
2014, as provided by the Petroleum Law. The Asher-Menashe License was issued
following the Company's successful completion of the work program under the
121,000 acre Asher Permit, originally granted to the Company effective August 1,
2005, in the course of which the Company developed three leads. Under
the terms of the Asher-Menashe License, as extended, the Company is required (i)
to sign an agreement with an appropriate geological services provider to acquire
at least 30 kilometers of 2D seismic by August 1, 2010, (ii) to commence the
seismic survey by October 1, 2010, (iii) to process and integrate the results of
the new seismic survey with existing seismic lines and file a report with the
Israeli Petroleum Commissioner by February 1, 2011, (iv) to identify a new
drilling prospect in the Asher-Menashe License area by April 1, 2011 and (v) to
sign a drilling contract to drill to the Permian geological layer by May 1, 2011
and to complete such drilling during 2011. The areas covered by the
Asher-Menashe License include the Elihah-3 well.
On May
20, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with the Geophysical Institute
of Israel (“GII”) to acquire approximately 32 kilometers of field seismic in the
Asher-Menashe License area, thereby satisfying the first condition under the
Company’s Asher-Menashe License. On June 20, 2010, GII commenced
field acquisition of seismic data in the Company’s Asher-Menashe License area,
thereby satisfying the second condition under the Company’s Asher-Menashe
License.
15
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
1 - Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation (cont’d)
A.
|
Nature
of Operations (cont’d)
|
(2) The
“Joseph License” covers approximately 83,272 acres on the Israeli coastal plain
south of the Asher-Menashe License between Caesarea in the north and Netanya in
the south. The Joseph License had an initial three-year term that ran
from October 11, 2007 through October 10, 2010 and, as of April 22, 2010, has
been extended for an additional one-year period ending October 10,
2011. The Joseph License may be extended for additional one-year
periods up to 2014, as provided by the Petroleum Law. The area
covered by the Company’s Joseph License covers approximately 85% of the area
subject to the 98,100 acre Ma’anit-Joseph License which had been held by the
Company until it was formally surrendered on June 22, 2007 in accordance with
the provisions of the Petroleum Law following the abandonment of the Ma’anit #1
well, drilled by the Company. The areas covered by the Joseph License
include the Ma’anit structure, on which the company drilled the Ma’anit #1 and
Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 wells, as well as the planned Ma'anit Joseph #3
well. Under the terms of the Joseph License, as extended, the Company
is required (i) to submit to the Israeli Petroleum Commissioner a report as to
the production testing of Zion’s Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well by October 1, 2010 and
(ii) to start drilling, by January 1, 2011, a well to the Permian geological
layer. Between May 2009 and October 2009, the Company drilled the
Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well to a depth of approximately 5,460 meters (17,913
feet). In April 2010, the Company conducted production tests on
several zones of interest identified during the drilling of the Ma’anit-Rehoboth
#2 well. The productions tests indicated that commercial quantities
of hydrocarbons were not present in the Ma’anit Rehoboth #2
well. Work on this well was subsequently suspended and an impairment
charge was recognized during the quarter ended June 30, 2010. (See
Note 2A).
Additionally,
in April 2010, the Company commenced preparations to drill a new well, the
Ma’anit-Joseph #3 well, on the Company’s Joseph License. The Company
plans to commence drilling the Ma’anit-Joseph #3 well in August or September
2010 to assess the hydrocarbon potential of the Permian geological
layer.
In the
event of a discovery on either of the licenses held, Zion will be entitled to
convert the relevant portions of the license to a 30-year production lease,
extendable to 50 years, subject to compliance with a field development work
program and production.
Permit
In August
2009, Zion was awarded a preliminary exclusive petroleum exploration permit (the
“Issachar-Zebulun Permit”) on approximately 165,000 acres onshore
Israel. The Issachar-Zebulun Permit is adjacent to and to the east of
the Company's Asher-Menashe License and is in the area that was formerly within
Issachar’s and Zebulun’s ancient biblical tribal areas.
The
Issachar-Zebulun Permit allows the Company to conduct, on an exclusive basis
through February 23, 2011, preliminary investigations to ascertain the prospects
for discovering petroleum in the area covered by the permit. Unlike a
license area, where test drilling may take place, no test drilling is allowed on
a permit area.
16
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
1 - Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation (cont’d)
A.
|
Nature
of Operations (cont’d)
|
The
Company contracted with GII on May 20, 2010 to acquire 32 kilometers of field
seismic on its Issachar-Zebulun Permit. In June 2010, field
acquisition of seismic was successfully completed
and it is anticipated that, by October 2010, the collected data will be
processed and interpreted for use in the Company's geologic model of the
area.
Drilling
Activities
In 2005,
in accordance with terms of the Ma’anit-Joseph License, the Company drilled the
Ma’anit #1 well on the Ma’anit prospect. Drilling breaks and shows of
hydrocarbons were recorded from approximately 12,000 feet to the total depth of
approximately 15,500 feet. Due to mechanical problems that prevented the Company
from isolating highly conductive water bearing zones from the tighter
hydrocarbon bearing formations, the shows were never successfully tested.
Despite the encouraging, but inconclusive results, the Company determined that
the well was incapable of producing oil and/or gas in commercial
quantities. As a result, the well was abandoned in June 2007,
following analysis of the results of the remedial workover operations conducted
between April and June 2007. (See Note 2A).
In May
2009, the Company commenced drilling the Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well to a depth of
approximately 5,460 meters (17,913 feet), utilizing a 2,000 horsepower drilling
rig and rig crews. The Company completed drilling and logging the well in
September 2009. During the drilling of this well, the Company reported that it
had positive indications that the well contained hydrocarbon bearing zones and
identified several such ‘zones of interest'. In December 2009, using
a workover rig, swabbing and preliminary completion testing took place. During
the preliminary completion testing, small quantities of crude oil were produced,
but further testing procedures were required to determine whether the Company
made a discovery of a hydrocarbon reservoir and, if so, whether it is
commercially viable. Production testing of the Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2
well commenced in February 2010. In April 2010, following the
completion of the production testing procedures, the Company determined that
commercial quantities of hydrocarbons were not present in the Ma'anit-Rehoboth
#2 well. The Company accordingly suspended drilling operations on the
Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well and took an impairment charge during the quarter ended
June 30, 2010. (See Note 2A).
On
October 20, 2009, the Company commenced drilling the Elijah #3 well on the
Asher-Menashe License. The Company targeted the Elijah #3 well to be drilled
toward the Triassic geological formation. The Company also planned to
continue drilling to the Permian geological formation, down to a total depth
below 5,182 meters (17,000 feet). As of January 15, 2010, the Company
drilled the Elijah #3 well to a depth of 10,938 feet (3,334
meters). In early February 2010, the Company temporarily suspended
drilling operations in the well following unsuccessful efforts to retrieve a
stuck pipe. The Company decided to acquire approximately 32
kilometers of additional field seismic data (in Zion’s Asher-Menashe License
area) to help resolve certain questions regarding the geology of the area
surrounding the Elijah #3 well. The acquisition of seismic and
subsequent processing is anticipated to be completed by the end of
2010.
17
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
1 - Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation (cont’d)
A.
|
Nature
of Operations (cont’d)
|
The
drilling rig and crew, utilized in the Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well and the Elijah
#3 well, are owned and operated by Aladdin Middle East Ltd. (“Aladdin”), a
Turkish based drilling rig operator. (See Note 6J).
Operations
in Israel are conducted through a branch office. The Asher-Menashe License, the
Joseph License and the Issachar-Zebulun Permit are held directly in the name of
the Company.
At
present it is expected that, other than investment income, any and all future
income will be derived from Israeli based operations.
|
B.
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
The
unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis, which contemplates realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities
in the ordinary course of business. Since the Company is in the development
stage, it has limited capital resources, no revenue, and a loss from operations.
The appropriateness of using the going concern basis is dependent upon the
Company's ability to obtain additional financing or equity capital to finance
its current operations and, ultimately, to realize profitable
operations.
The
accompanying unaudited interim financial statements were prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for the
preparation of interim financial statements and, therefore, do not include all
disclosures necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles used in annual financial statements. All adjustments,
which are, in the opinion of management, of a normal recurring nature and are
necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements, have been
included. Nevertheless, these financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and related notes included in the Company's annual
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year or any
other interim period.
Note
2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
A.
|
Oil
and Gas Properties and Impairment
|
The
Company follows the full-cost method of accounting for oil and gas
properties. Accordingly, all costs associated with acquisition,
exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, including directly related
overhead costs, are capitalized.
All
capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, including the estimated future
costs to develop proved reserves, are amortized by the unit-of-production method
using estimates of proved reserves. Investments in unproved
properties and major development projects are not amortized until proved
reserves associated with the projects can be determined or until impairment
occurs. If the results of an assessment indicate that the properties are
impaired, the amount of the impairment is included in income from continuing
operations before income taxes and the adjusted carrying amount of the unproved
properties is amortized by the unit-of-production method.
18
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)
|
A.
|
Oil
and Gas Properties and Impairment
(cont’d)
|
The
Company’s oil and gas property represents our investment in our unproved
properties. These costs are excluded from the amortized cost pool
until proved reserves are found or until it is determined that the costs are
impaired. All costs excluded are reviewed at least quarterly to
determine if impairment has occurred. The amount of any impairment is
charged to expense since a reserve base has not yet been
established. A further impairment requiring a charge to expense may
be indicated through evaluation of drilling results, relinquishing drilling
rights or other information.
An
abandonment of properties is accounted for as an adjustment to capitalized
costs. The net capitalized costs are subject to a “ceiling test,” which limits
such costs to the aggregate of the estimated present value of future net
revenues from proved reserves discounted at ten percent based on current
economic and operating conditions, plus the lower of cost or fair market value
of unproved properties. The recoverability of amounts capitalized for oil and
gas properties is dependent upon the identification of economically recoverable
reserves, together with obtaining the necessary financing to exploit such
reserves and the achievement of profitable operations.
In June 2007, following the analysis
of the results of the testing of the Company’s Ma’anit #1 well workover and an
evaluation of the mechanical condition of the well, the Company determined that
the well was incapable of producing oil and/or gas in commercial quantities. As
a result of the unsuccessful Ma’anit #1 well and formal relinquishment of the
Ma’anit-Joseph License, the Company recorded in June 2007 an impairment charge
of $9,494,000 to its unproved oil and gas properties.
As
planned, the Company used the Ma’anit #1 wellbore, down to approximately 3,000
meters (9,842 feet), as the upper part of the wellbore for the Ma’anit-Rehoboth
#2 well. This well was directionally drilled from that point to
penetrate the middle and the lower Triassic. The Company drilled this
well to a depth of 5,460 meters (17,913 feet). In April 2010, following
production and other testing, management concluded that commercial quantities of
hydrocarbons were not present in the Ma'anit-Rehoboth # 2 well. Accordingly, the
Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $22,022,000 in the quarter
ended June 30, 2010 to its unproved oil and gas properties.
The
Company’s ability to maintain present operations is dependent on two petroleum
exploration licenses and one petroleum exploration permit: (a) The Joseph
License, in respect of which two wells have been drilled and planning is under
way for a third well, the Ma’anit-Joseph #3 well; (b) the Asher-Menashe License,
in respect of which drilling operations have been temporarily suspended on the
Elijah #3 well pending the acquisition, processing and interpretation of
additional seismic data; and (c) the Issachar-Zebulun Permit, in respect of
which a work program to interpret and process seismic data (which was obtained
in June 2010) is currently underway.
19
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)
|
A.
|
Nature
of Operations (cont’d)
|
The
Company has no economically recoverable reserves and no amortization base.
Excluding the impairment charges discussed above in the aggregate amount of
$22,022,000 the Company’s unproved oil and gas properties consist of capitalized
exploration costs of $14,420,000 at June 30, 2010.
Unproved
oil and gas properties, under the full cost method, are comprised as
follows:
June 30
2010
|
December 31
2009
|
|||||||
US$ thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
|||||||
Excluded from amortization base:
|
||||||||
Drilling
operations, completion costs and other related costs
|
11,936 | 20,823 | ||||||
Capitalized
salary costs
|
561 | 1,003 | ||||||
Legal
costs and license fees
|
1,385 | 922 | ||||||
Other
costs
|
538 | 1,011 | ||||||
$ | 14,420 | $ | 23,759 |
Impairment
of unproved oil and gas properties comprised as follows:
For the six month period ended
|
||||||||||||
June 30 2010
|
June 30 2009
|
Period from April 6,
2000 (inception) to
June 30, 2010
|
||||||||||
US$
thousands
|
US$
thousands
|
US$ thousands
|
||||||||||
Drilling
operations, completion costs and other related costs
|
20,419 | - | 28,378 | |||||||||
Capitalized
salary costs
|
620 | - | 1,303 | |||||||||
Legal
costs and license fees
|
- | - | 509 | |||||||||
Other
costs
|
983 | - | 1,326 | |||||||||
22,022 | - | 31,516 |
B. Net
Loss per Share Data
Diluted
net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share as the inclusion of
1,016,729 and 1,101,753, common stock equivalents in the second quarter of 2010
and 2009, respectively, would be anti-dilutive.
20
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)
|
C.
|
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
|
|
1.
|
SEC
Final Rule - Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting / Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) 2010-03 – Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and
Disclosures
|
|
In
December 2008, the SEC published authoritative guidance as the Final Rule
“Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting” and in January 2010, ASU 2010-03
was issued in order to align the oil and gas reserve estimation and
disclosure requirements of Extractive Activities – Oil and Gas (Topic 932)
with the requirements in the SEC’s final rule. The new guidance
permits the use of new technologies to determine proved reserves if those
technologies have been demonstrated to lead to reliable conclusions about
reserves volumes. The new requirements also will allow
companies to disclose their probable and possible reserves to
investors. In addition, the new disclosure requirements require
companies to, among other things: (a) report the independence
and qualifications of its reserves preparer or auditor; (b) file reports
when a third party is relied upon to prepare reserves estimates or
conducts a reserves audit; and (c) report oil and gas reserves using an
average price based upon the prior 12-month period rather than period-end
prices. The use of the new proved reserve definitions and
average prices in developing the Company’s reserve estimates will affect
future impairment and depletion
calculations.
|
The new
disclosure requirements are effective for annual reports on Form 10-K for fiscal
years ending on or after December 31, 2009. A company may not apply
the new rules to disclosures in quarterly reports prior to the first annual
report in which the revised disclosures are required. Since the
Company does not yet have any proved reserves, the adoption of this Final Rule
has had no material effect on the Company’s disclosures, financial position or
results of operations.
Note
3 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company’s financial assets and liabilities consist of cash and cash equivalents
and trade payables. The carrying amount of these financial
instruments approximate fair value. Assets held for severance
benefits are recorded at their current cash redemption value.
Note
4 - Stockholders’ Equity
A.
|
Third
Rights Offering
|
On
January 28, 2010, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with
the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to a shelf offering. The
registration statement, as subsequently amended on March 26, 2010, was declared
effective on April 16, 2010.
21
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
4 - Stockholders’ Equity (cont’d)
A.
|
Third
Rights Offering
(cont’d)
|
Utilizing
the effective registration statement, in May 2010, the Company launched a rights
offering to raise up to $50 million (the “Third Rights
Offering”). Under the Third Rights Offering, the Company
distributed to each holder of record as of the close of business on May 6, 2010,
at no charge, .5 of a subscription right for each share held as of such date
(i.e., one subscription right for each two shares). Each whole subscription
right entitled the stockholder to purchase one share of common stock at the
purchase price of $5.00 per share. Shareholders who exercised their rights in
full were entitled to purchase additional shares pursuant to an
over-subscription right to the extent holders did not fully subscribe for their
basic subscription rights. The Third Rights offering, originally scheduled to
terminate on June 30, 2010, was extended to July 15, 2010, whereupon it
terminated. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had received
subscriptions for 1,008,400 shares of common stock, resulting in proceeds of
$5,042,000 at quarter end. Between July 1, 2010 and July 15, 2010,
the Company received additional subscriptions of 1,462,717 shares of common
stock, resulting in additional proceeds of $7,313,585. In total, the
Company received subscriptions for a total of 2,471,117 shares, resulting in
gross proceeds of $12,355,585. After deducting $123,000 in offering
costs, the Company received net proceeds of $12,232,585. (See Note
7).
|
B.
|
2005
Stock Option Plan
|
In
January 2010, the Company’s Board agreed to and approved the following option
award grants under the 2005 Stock Option Plan: (a) to one employee for the
purchase of 20,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per
share through January 31, 2020 (these options vest in four equal tranches of
four vesting periods of 5,000 options each, on March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010,
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010), which will be charged according to
the vesting periods (b) to one employee for the purchase of 40,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share through December 3, 2017
(these options vest in four equal tranches of four vesting periods of 10,000
options each, on March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010, September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2010), which will be charged according to the vesting periods (c) to one
employee for the purchase of 25,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price
of $7.15 per share through December 31, 2014 (these options vest in four equal
tranches of four vesting periods of 6,250 options each, on March 31, 2010, June
30, 2010, September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010), which will be charged
according to the vesting periods (e) to one employee for the purchase of 12,000
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.15 per share through December
31, 2014 (these options vest in four equal tranches of four vesting periods of
3,000 options each, on March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010, September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2010), which will be charged according to the vesting periods. In
January 2010, the Company’s Board agreed to and approved an option award grant
under the 2005 Stock Option Plan to one employee pursuant to which such employee
is to be awarded, at the end of each quarter, fully vested options exercisable
through January 31, 2020 at a per share exercise price of $0.01, to purchase
such number of shares of the Company Common Stock as shall equal $12,500 divided
by the closing price on the last trading day of the calendar quarter of the
Company’s publicly traded share of Common Stock, but in no event at a per share
price of less than $5.00. Pursuant thereto, the employee received a
first quarter award to purchase up to 2,022 shares of common stock and a second
quarter option award to purchase up to 2,481 shares of common
stock. The expenses are amortized based on the vesting periods,
posting appropriate amounts each quarter.
22
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
4 - Stockholders’ Equity (cont’d)
|
C.
|
Fair
Value of Warrants and Options
|
The
Company has reserved 1,516,679 shares of common stock as of June 30, 2010 for
the exercise of warrants and options to employees and non-employees, of which
1,016,729 are outstanding. These warrants and options have been excluded from
earnings per share calculations because they are anti-dilutive at June 30, 2010
and 2009 and the period from April 6, 2000 (inception) to June 30, 2010. These
warrants and options could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in future
years. The warrants and options exercise prices and expiration dates are as
follows:
Exercise
|
Number
of
|
Expiration
|
Warrants
or
|
||||||||
price
|
shares
|
Date
|
Options
|
||||||||
US$
|
|||||||||||
To
non-employees
|
|||||||||||
8.25 | 58,000 |
June
16, 2012
|
Options
|
||||||||
To
employees and directors
|
|||||||||||
5.00 | 66,667 |
December
31, 2010
|
Options
|
||||||||
8.25 | 50,000 |
June
16, 2012
|
Options
|
||||||||
7.97 | 50,000 |
December
31, 2014
|
Options
|
||||||||
7.15 | 37,000 |
December
31, 2014
|
Options
|
||||||||
0.01 | 123,882 |
December
3, 2017
|
Options
|
||||||||
0.01 | 24,501 |
January
31, 2020
|
Options
|
||||||||
To
investors
|
|||||||||||
7.00 | 606,679 |
January
31, 2012
|
Warrants
|
||||||||
6.04 | * | 1,016,729 |
* Weighted
Average
The
warrant and option transactions since April 6, 2000 (inception) are shown in the
table below:
Number
of
|
Weighted Average
|
|||||||
shares
|
exercise
price
|
|||||||
US$
|
||||||||
Granted
from April 6, 2000 (inception) to December 31, 2008 to:
|
||||||||
Employees,
officers and directors
|
1,884,818 | 1.76 | ||||||
Underwriters
(in connection with IPO)
|
46,621 | 8.75 | ||||||
Private
placement investors and others
|
1,105,492 | 2.84 | ||||||
Investors
in Follow On Public Offering
|
416,404 | 7.00 | ||||||
Expired/Cancelled
|
(705,684 | ) | 2.61 | |||||
Exercised
|
(1,984,077 | ) | 1.59 | |||||
Outstanding,
December 31, 2008
|
763,574 | 4.52 | ||||||
Granted
to:
|
||||||||
Employees,
officers and directors
|
202,000 | 6.55 | ||||||
Investors
in Follow On Public Offering
|
249,939 | 7.00 | ||||||
Expired/Cancelled
|
(40,000 | ) | 5.22 | |||||
Exercised
|
(180,810 | ) | 6.62 | |||||
Outstanding,
December 31, 2009
|
994,703 | 6.14 | ||||||
Granted
to:
|
||||||||
Employees,
officers and directors
|
101,501 | 2.61 | ||||||
Exercised
|
(40,475 | ) | 0.09 | |||||
Expired/Cancelled
|
(39,000 | ) | 5.87 | |||||
Outstanding,
June 30, 2010
|
1,016,729 | 6.04 |
23
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
4 - Stockholders’ Equity (cont’d)
|
C.
|
Fair
Value of Warrants and Options
(cont’d)
|
The
following table summarizes information about stock warrants and options
outstanding as of June 30, 2010:
Shares
underlying outstanding
|
Shares
underlying outstanding
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
warrants
and options (nonvested)
|
warrants
and options (all fully vested)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
average
|
average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
remaining
|
Weighted
|
remaining
|
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Range
of
|
Number
|
contractual
|
Average
|
Range
of
|
Number
|
contractual
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
exercise
price
|
outstanding
|
life
(years)
|
Exercise
|
exercise
|
Outstanding
|
Life
(years)
|
exercise
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
price
|
price
|
price
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$
|
US$
|
US$
|
US$
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
0.01
|
20,000 | 7.43 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 103,882 | 7.43 | 0.01 | |||||||||||||||||||||
0.01
|
10,000 | 9.59 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 14,501 | 9.59 | 0.01 | |||||||||||||||||||||
-
|
- | - | - | 5.00 | 66,667 | 0.5 | 5.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
7.00 | 606,679 | 1.59 | 7.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.15
|
18,500 | 4.51 | 7.15 | 7.15 | 18,500 | 4.51 | 7.15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
7.97
|
30,000 | 4.51 | 7.97 | 7.97 | 20,000 | 4.51 | 7.97 | |||||||||||||||||||||
-
|
- | - | - | 8.25 | 108,000 | 1.96 | 8.25 | |||||||||||||||||||||
0.01-7.97
|
78,500 | 4.73 | 0.01-8.25 | 938,229 | 6.14 |
Granted
to employees
The
following table sets forth information about the weighted-average fair value of
warrants granted to employees and directors during the six month period ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the period from April 6, 2000 (inception) to June
30, 2010, using the Black Scholes option-pricing model and the weighted-average
assumptions used for such grants:
24
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
4 - Stockholders’ Equity (cont’d)
|
C.
|
Fair
Value of Warrants and Options
(cont’d)
|
For
the six month period
|
Period
from April 6,
|
|||||||||||
ended
June 30,
|
2000
(inception) to
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
June
30, 2010
|
||||||||||
US$
|
US$
|
US$
|
||||||||||
Weighted-average
fair value of underlying stock at grant date
|
6.47 | 7.71 | 3.00 – 7.71 | |||||||||
Dividend
yields
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Expected
volatility
|
71-79 | % | 59.0 – 71.0 | % | 28.2% - 79 | % | ||||||
Risk-free
interest rates
|
2.38-3.84 | % | 1.79 – 2.47 | % | 1.79% - 5.15 | % | ||||||
Expected
lives
|
2.19-4.88 | 1.5 – 4.81 |
1.74
– 4.88 years
|
|||||||||
Weighted-average
grant date fair
value
|
2.80-6.51 | 4.93 | 0.76 - 6.51 |
Granted
to non-employees
The
following table sets forth information about the weighted-average fair value of
warrants granted to non-employees during the six month periods ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 and the period from April 6, 2000 (inception) to June 30, 2010,
using the Black Scholes option-pricing model and the weighted-average
assumptions used for such grants:
For
the six month period
|
Period
from April 6,
|
|||||||||||
ended
June 30,
|
2000
(inception) to
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
June
30, 2010
|
||||||||||
US$
|
US$
|
US$
|
||||||||||
Weighted-average
fair value of underlying stock at grant date
|
- | 8.23 | 1.00 – 8.75 | |||||||||
Dividend
yields
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Expected
volatility
|
- | 71 | % | 32.2% - 99.8 | % | |||||||
Risk-free
interest rates
|
- | 1.79 | % | 2.8% - 5.50 | % | |||||||
Contractual
lives
|
- | 3.00 |
0.56
– 3.17 years
|
|||||||||
Weighted-average
grant date fair value
|
- | 3.91 | 0.68 – 2.74 |
The risk-free interest rate is based
on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods
corresponding with the expected life of the options.
The
expected life represents the weighted average period of time that options
granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected life of the options granted
to employees and directors during 2009 is calculated based on the Simplified
Method as allowed under Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 (“SAB 110”), giving
consideration to the contractual term of the options and their vesting
schedules, as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data at
this time. The expected life of the option granted to non-employees equals their
contractual term. In the case of an extension of the option life, the
calculation was made on the basis of the extended life.
Prior to
2008, due to the lack of sufficient history of the Company’s stock volatility,
the Company estimated its own expected stock volatility based on the historic
volatility for other oil exploration companies. Beginning in 2008 and
continuing through June 30, 2010, the Company’s stock volatility is based on
actual trading of the Company’s stock.
25
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note 4 - Stockholders’ Equity
(cont’d)
D.
|
Compensation
Cost for Warrant and Option
Issuances
|
The
compensation cost of warrant and option issuances recognized for the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and from April 6, 2000
(inception) to June 30, 2010 amounted to $176,000, $447,000, $198,000, $354,000
and $2,049,000, respectively.
26
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
4 - Stockholders’ Equity (cont’d)
D.
|
Compensation
Cost for Warrant and Option Issuances
(cont’d)
|
As of
June 30, 2010, there was $171,000 of unrecognized compensation cost, related to
nonvested stock options granted under the Company’s various stock option plans.
That cost is expected to be recognized as follows:
US$
thousands
|
||||
July
1 - December 31, 2010
|
142 | |||
For
the year ended December 31, 2011
|
27 | |||
For
the year ended December 31, 2012
|
2 | |||
171 |
|
E.
|
Warrant
Descriptions
|
Through
the balance sheet date the Company issued nine different series of warrants to
employees, non-employees and investors. The price and the expiration dates are
as follows:
Period of Grant
|
US$
|
Expiration Date
|
|||||
A
Warrants
|
January
2001 – December 2001
|
1.00 |
January
31, 2005
|
||||
B
Warrants
|
November
2001 – February 2003
|
1.50 |
January
31, 2005
|
||||
C
Warrants
|
July
2003 – March 2004
|
3.00 |
December
31, 2005
|
||||
$3.00
Warrants
|
June
2004 – August 2004
|
3.00 |
December
31, 2006
|
||||
D
Warrants
|
September
2004 – April 2005
|
4.00 |
December
31, 2006
|
||||
E
Warrants
|
September
2004 – June 2005
|
5.00 |
December
31, 2006
|
||||
F
and FF Warrants
|
October
2005
|
5.00 |
*
December 31, 2008
|
||||
G
Warrants
|
December
2005 – January 2006
|
5.50 |
December
31, 2008
|
||||
H
Warrants
|
December
2006 –May 2007
|
8.75 |
September
26, 2009
|
||||
Unit
Warrants
|
October
2008 – December 2008
|
7.00 |
January
31,
2012
|
* Subsequently
extended to December 31, 2009 for some of this class of warrants
Other
than price and date details, all of the warrants, except for the Unit Warrants,
were issued on the same conditions, except that the F, FF and G Warrants were
not exercisable before July 1, 2007, on which date the Company had the right to
extend for up to six months (which right was not exercised by the Company), and
H warrants were not exercisable before November 25, 2007, which was six months
following the final closing date of the Initial Public Offering. The
Unit Warrants were issued as a component of a Unit that consisted of one share
of common stock and one warrant during the Company’s Follow On Public
Offering. On February 9, 2009, the Unit split into its two
components. The warrant became exercisable as of February 9,
2009.
|
F.
|
Gift
Shares
|
During
the third quarter of 2007, three employees received 1,042 registered shares from
one of the executive officers. The related cost of $7,000 was charged
to the statement of operations and credited as additional paid in
capital.
27
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
4 - Stockholders’ Equity (cont’d)
F.
|
Gift
Shares (cont’d)
|
During
the fourth quarter of 2008, sixteen persons who were either employees, vendors
or other affiliates of the company received a total of 15,600
shares. Since the gift was being issued from shares that were subject
to 144 restrictions, held by one of the executive officers, the
shares were transferred with the restrictive legend
affixed. Recipients could seek the removal of this restriction on an
individual basis as the donor had held the shares in excess of the required time
period under Rule 144. The related cost of $101,000 was charged to
the statement of operations and credited as additional paid in
capital.
During
the second quarter of 2009, two persons who are employees of the Company
received a total of 400 shares from one of the executive
officers. The related value of $4,000 was charged to the statement of
operations and credited as additional paid in capital.
Note
5 - Related Party Transactions
The
Company had $246,000 of deferred officers’ compensation at June 30, 2010 which
represents payables to officers and directors of the Company. This
amount was paid in full on August 2, 2010. (See Note
7). Such officers have committed to defer payments of these sums
through 2010. (See Note 6F).
At
December 2009, deferred officers’ compensation was $477,000, which was paid
during the first quarter of 2010.
In
December 2008 and January 2009 two of the Company’s then senior officers
purchased Units in the Follow On Public Offering through the non-cash conversion
of amounts then owed to them in respect of deferred salaries and other payments
in the aggregate amount of $140,000.
Richard J. Rinberg
In
October 2005 Mr. Rinberg was elected President of the Company and effective
November 1, 2005, entered into a two year Retention and Management Agreement
with the Company (the “Retention Agreement”). Pursuant to the
Retention Agreement, Mr. Rinberg was awarded 200,000 shares of common stock (the
“Rinberg Shares”) of the Company valued at $500,000 as compensation for his
services during the two-year period beginning November 1, 2005, subject to
restrictions and vesting requirements. The Rinberg Shares were
subject to repurchase by the Company at $0.01 per share if Mr. Rinberg had left
his position with the Company prior to October 31, 2007. In May 2006,
the Company issued the Rinberg Shares to a trust company for the benefit of Mr.
Rinberg.
Note
6 - Commitments and Contingencies
A.
|
Environmental
Matters
|
The
Company is engaged in oil and gas exploration and production and may become
subject to certain liabilities as they relate to environmental cleanup of well
sites or other environmental restoration procedures as they relate to the
drilling of oil and gas wells or the operation thereof.
28
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
6 - Commitments and Contingencies (cont’d)
A.
|
Environmental
Matters (cont’d)
|
The
Company currently estimates that environmental clean up/restoration of the well
sites will be approximately $50,000. Although the timing of such
payment is uncertain a provision has been made and is included in the oil and
gas properties. No other environmental claims have been made, nor is
the Company aware of any contingent demands relating thereto. Liabilities for
expenditures are recorded when environmental assessment and/or remediation is
probable and the timing and costs can be reasonably estimated.
B.
|
Royalty
Commitments
|
The
Company is obligated, according to the Petroleum Law, to pay royalties to the
Government of Israel on the gross production of oil and gas from the oil and gas
properties of the Company located in Israel (except those reserves serving to
operate the wells and related equipment and facilities). The royalty rate stated
in the Petroleum Law is 12.5% of the produced reserves. At June 30,
2010 or December 31, 2009, the Company did not have any outstanding obligation
with respect to royalty payments, since it is at the “exploration stage” and, to
this date, no proved reserves have been found.
C.
|
Long-term
Incentive Plan
|
The
Company may initiate the establishment of a long-term management incentive plan
for key employees whereby a 1.5% overriding royalty or equivalent interest in
the Asher-Menashe License and Joseph License and such other oil and gas
exploration and development rights as may in the future be acquired by the
Company would be assigned to key employees. As the plan has not been
established as of June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009, the Company did not have
any outstanding obligation in respect of the plan.
D.
|
Charitable
Foundations
|
The
Company has established two charitable foundations, one in Israel and one in
Switzerland, for the purpose of supporting charitable projects and other
charities in Israel, the United States and internationally. A 3% overriding
royalty in the Company's current Israeli oil and gas interests has been assigned
to each charitable organization (6% overriding interest in the
aggregate). At June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009, the Company did
not have any outstanding obligation in respect of the charitable foundations,
since it is at the “exploration stage” and, to this date, no proved reserves
have been found.
E.
|
Surface
Rights of Drilling Operations
|
The
surface rights to the drill site from which the Company drilled the Ma’anit #1
and Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 and plan to drill the Ma’anit-Joseph #3 well, are held
under long-term lease by Kibbutz Ma’anit (the “Kibbutz”) with the Israel Lands
Authority (the “Authority”). Permission necessary to use the drill
site for the Ma’anit Joseph #3 well, to conduct petroleum operations has been
granted to the Company by the Kibbutz in consideration for a fee of
approximately $50,000 for the period up to October 10, 2010 and $5,000 for each
year thereafter.
The
surface rights to the drill site from which the Company drilled the Elijah #3
are held under long-term lease by Kibbutz Ein Carmel with the Authority.
Permission necessary to enter and use the drill site to conduct petroleum
operations on the Elijah #3 has been granted to the Company by the Kibbutz in
consideration for a one-time fee of approximately $124,000.
29
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
6 - Commitments and Contingencies (cont’d)
E.
|
Surface
Rights of Drilling Operations
(cont’d)
|
Permission
of the Israel Lands Authority for the use of the surface rights is also
required. The consent for Ma'anit Rehoboth #2 and Elijah #3 were obtained but
such consents are scheduled to terminate on August 13, 2010 with respect to
Ma'anit Rehoboth #2 well and October 11, 2010 with respect to Elijah #3 well.
The Company is in the process of obtaining an extension to the consent for
Ma'anit-Rehoboth #2 well. The Company is also in the process of obtaining the
requisite permission for Ma'anit-Joseph 3.
F.
|
Payments
to executives and deferral of
compensation
|
Under
existing compensation agreements, the Company is committed to pay certain of its
executive officers and other employees an aggregate amount of $1,277,000 on an
annual basis. Most of these officers and employees have agreed to
continue to defer a portion of their pay during 2010 (See Note
5). During the six month period ended June 30, 2010, $435,000 of
amounts previously deferred was paid to executives and employees.
H.
|
Lease
Commitments
|
The
Company leases approximately 3,600 square feet of office space in Dallas, Texas
under a lease which expires on October 31, 2011. The monthly rent was $4,000
during the twelve-month period ending October 31, 2008, was $4,500 during the
twelve-month period ending October 31, 2009, is $4,600 for the twelve-month
period ending October 31, 2010 and will be $4,700 during the twelve-month period
ending October 31, 2011.
During
July 2005, the Company entered into a rental agreement for approximately 3,165
square feet of office space in the industrial area of Caesarea, Israel. The
rental was for a six-month period commencing August 1, 2005 with two additional
three-month option periods at a monthly rental cost of $3,000. The Company
subsequently extended the rental agreement through January 31, 2009, and then
exercised the option to extend the lease for two additional periods of six
months each (through January 31, 2010). The Company has subsequently
entered into an additional six-month extension, followed by two additional
six-month option periods. The monthly rental cost during this
extended period continues at $3,000.
In March
2010, the Company leased approximately 500 square feet of office space in State
College, Pennsylvania for its President and Chief Operating
Officer. The initial lease is for 12 months, expiring at the end of
February 2011. The monthly rental amount is $525.
30
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
6 - Commitments and Contingencies (cont’d)
H.
|
Lease
Commitments (cont’d)
|
The
future minimum lease payments as of June 30, 2010 are as follows:
US$
thousands
|
||||
2010
|
46 | |||
2011
|
57 | |||
103 |
I.
|
Contract
with Geophysical Institute of
Israel
|
On
January 31, 2010, in connection with planned seismic, magnetic and gravimetric
surveys on the Issachar-Zebulun permit area, the Company entered into another
agreement with GII to acquire necessary data. On May 14, 2010, the
Company entered into an amended agreement with GII to obtain additional seismic
data in the Company’s Asher Menashe License from the area surrounding the Elijah
#3 well. The agreement, as amended, provides for a 64-kilometer
program, subject to increase or decrease by the Company, with approximately 32
kilometers to be acquired on the Issachar-Zebulun Permit and another 32
kilometers to be acquired on the Asher Menashe License. The
agreement, as amended, provides for the survey to be performed by GII on a per
kilometer basis at a rate of NIS 44,000 (approximately $11,430) per
kilometer. An initial amount of NIS 150,000 (approximately US
$39,000) was paid upon signing of the initial agreement. Additional
amounts of (i) NIS 100,000 (approximately US $26,000) and (ii) a prepayment of
NIS 1,000,000 (approximately US $260,000) were paid in connection with the
signing of the amended agreement.
J.
|
Drilling
Contract and Memorandum of
Understanding
|
On
September 12, 2008, the Company entered into a drilling contract with Aladdin
Middle East Ltd. pursuant to which Aladdin shipped into Israel its 2,000
horsepower rig for use in the drilling contemplated by the Company’s business
plan. The rig arrived in Israel, cleared customs in April 2009 and was used to
drill the Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well and subsequently the Elijah #3 well. The
contract provided for the wells to be drilled on a daywork basis with payment to
Aladdin at the rate of $28,500 per drilling day, and other scheduled rates for
non-operating days. The contract originally provided for mobilization and
de-mobilization fees of $675,000 each. The Company paid Aladdin $475,000 on
account of mobilization fees, which are included in the well cost. Subsequent
amendments provided that the remaining $200,000 payment was to be offset against
the amount paid by the Company for the drilling and no additional cash outlay
was due upon mobilization. The contract, as further amended, provided for a
demobilization fee of $550,000, but also provided that, in the event that
Aladdin enters into a drilling contract with another operator in Israel, then
the demobilization fee will be reduced if and to the extent that Aladdin
receives funds from such other operator. As security for these and related fees,
the contract, as amended, called for the Company to provide a letter of credit
to Aladdin in the amount of $550,000.
31
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
6 - Commitments and Contingencies (cont’d)
J.
|
Drilling
Contract and Memorandum of Understanding
(cont’d)
|
However,
in April 2009, the parties further amended the contract to eliminate the letter
of credit requirement. In exchange, the Company provided Aladdin with
a cash advance in the amount of $300,000 that was to be offset against future
payments to Aladdin under the contract. The contract was again
amended, in December 2009, and the Company paid to Aladdin an additional
$250,000 cash advance in exchange for the Company being released of its
obligation to pay the $550,000 demobilization fee. Aladdin continues
to be bound to reimburse the Company with respect to any demobilization fee it
may receive from another operator.
In May
2010, the contract was further amended. Under the terms of the May 2010
amendment, Aladdin and the Company extended the term of the agreement to cover
the drilling of the Company’s planned Ma’anit-Joseph #3 well to a depth of 5,900
meters. In addition, the agreement was further amended in order to
transfer to Aladdin the obligation to pay certain taxes that may be
owed. Also under the May 2010 amendment, Aladdin agreed to reimburse
the Company for certain insurance premiums incurred by the
Company. The amendment also memorialized an advance, previously
remitted by the Company to Aladdin, in an amount of $750,000 and provided that
the amount of the advance would be offset against future Aladdin
invoices.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009 and through June 30, 2010, the Company made
payments of $8,854,000 to Aladdin after the deduction of $935,000 for
reimbursement of the drill pipe expenditures, $151,000 for reimbursement of
expenses paid by the Company on Aladdin’s behalf and $750,000 for reimbursement
of a cash advance previously provided by the Company to Aladdin. The
Company has also paid $355,000 to Aladdin for corporate taxes due by Aladdin and
paid an advance payment of $550,000 for payment of the demobilization fee, which
amount is classified as a prepayment. The Company remains entitled to
a reimbursement or credit of the $550,000 demobilization fee in the event the
rig is not moved from Israel.
On April
9, 2010, the Company and Aladdin, signed a Memorandum of Understanding which
outlines plans to establish a subsidiary, tentatively named Zion Drilling, Inc.,
for the purpose of purchasing and operating Aladdin’s 2,000 horsepower drilling
rig (currently located at Zion's Ma'anit-Rehoboth #2 wellsite, in
Israel). The planned subsidiary, which would be 51% owned by the
Company and 49% by Aladdin, is to purchase Aladdin’s drilling rig for an initial
payment of $7 million and a series of $1 million additional payments that are
anticipated to coincide with our planned drilling of seven additional wells in
Israel during the next few years. The funds for the purchase of the rig are to
be provided by the Company. The Company plans with Aladdin are subject to a
number of events, including satisfactory completion of due diligence, the
raising of sufficient capital and the negotiation and execution of definitive
agreements relating to the establishment of Zion Drilling, Inc.
Note
7 - Subsequent Events
(i) On
July 15, 2010, the Company's Third Rights Offering, originally scheduled to
terminate on June 30, 2010, was terminated. The Company received subscriptions
for a total of 2,471,117 shares, resulting in gross proceeds of
$12,355,585. After deducting $123,000 in offering costs, the Company
received net proceeds of $12,235,585. Net proceeds are being applied to the
Company’s drilling program and other operations.
32
Zion
Oil & Gas Inc
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial
Statements as of June 30,
2010
|
Note
7 - Subsequent Events (cont’d)
Under the
Third Rights Offering, the Company distributed to each holder of record as of
close of business on May 6, 2010, at no charge, .5 of a subscription right for
each share held as of such date (i.e., one subscription right for each two
shares). Each whole subscription right entitled the stockholder to purchase one
share of common stock at the purchase price of $5.00 per share. Shareholders who
exercised their rights in full were entitled to purchase additional shares
pursuant to an over-subscription right to the extent holders did not fully
subscribe for their basic subscription rights.
(ii) By mutual agreement of the
Company and Sandra Green, effective July 8, 2010, Ms. Green has resigned from
her position as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Vice President. Ms.
Green’s resignation stemmed from personal reasons. In connection with her
resignation, on July 8, 2010, the Company and Ms. Green entered into a
settlement agreement terminating Ms. Green’s employment agreement with the
Company. Under the agreement, the Company agreed to remit to Ms. Green amounts
payable to her in respect of deferred compensation in the approximate amount of
$20,000. In accordance with the terms of her employment agreement, the Company
will pay to Ms. Green all amounts payable under the employment agreement through
January 31, 2011, the scheduled expiration date of her employment. Under the
settlement agreement, Ms. Green furnished to the Company a general
release.
(iii) On
August 2, 2010, the Company paid $246,000 of deferred officers’ compensation
which amount represents the balance owed to certain officers of the Company at
June 30, 2010.
33
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATION
THE
FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR UNAUDITED INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE RELATED NOTES TO THOSE STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS
FORM 10-Q. SOME OF OUR DISCUSSION IS FORWARD-LOOKING AND INVOLVES RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. FOR INFORMATION REGARDING RISK FACTORS THAT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL
ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS, REFER TO THE DISCUSSION OF RISK FACTORS IN
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS SECTION OF OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION.
Forward-Looking
Statements
Certain
statements made in this discussion are “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements may materially differ from actual results.
Forward-looking
statements can be identified by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”,
“intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, or “continue” or
the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology and include, without
limitation, statements regarding:
|
·
|
exploration,
development, and drilling plans;
|
|
·
|
future
general and administrative
expenses;
|
|
·
|
future
exploration;
|
|
·
|
future
geophysical and geological data;
|
|
·
|
growth
strategies;
|
|
·
|
new
prospects and drilling locations;
|
|
·
|
future
capital expenditures;
|
|
·
|
sufficiency
of working capital;
|
|
·
|
plans
regarding and ability to raise additional
capital;
|
|
·
|
drilling
plans;
|
|
·
|
timing
or results of any wells;
|
|
·
|
interpretation
and results of seismic surveys or seismic
data;
|
|
·
|
permit,
license and lease rights;
|
|
·
|
participation
of operating partners;
|
|
·
|
legislative
and regulatory initiatives, their potential results and effects;
and
|
|
·
|
any
other statements regarding future operations, financial results,
opportunities, growth, business plans, and
strategies.
|
Because
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Although we believe
that expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we
cannot guarantee future results, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither
we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness
of these forward-looking statements. We undertake no duty to update any
forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform such
statements to actual results.
34
Overview
Zion Oil
is an initial stage oil and gas exploration company with a history of over ten
years of oil and gas exploration in Israel. We have no revenues or operating
income and we are classified as an "exploration stage" company. The
Company currently holds two petroleum exploration licenses, named by the
Company, the “Joseph License” and the “Asher-Menashe License” and one
preliminary exclusive petroleum exploration permit, named by the Company, the
"Issachar-Zebulun” permit. Zion’s total petroleum exploration area is
approximately 327,100 acres.
The
Joseph License and Asher-Menashe License areas, as well as the Issachar-Zebulun
permit area, are contiguous in a similar geologic environment. They are located
on a continuous regional high associated with the basement to a Paleozoic Age
structure (approximately 280 million years old) that runs parallel to the
current coast of Israel primarily onshore, from just off of Haifa to south of
Tel Aviv. The regional high is evidenced by gravimetric anomalies in both
license areas. This structure and other geologic elements common to both areas,
including particularly the Triassic Age (approximately 205-245 million years
ago) Ma'anit structure that extends from the Joseph License area into the
Asher-Menashe License area, lend themselves to an integrated exploratory program
(and, if successful, may lend themselves to an integrated development
program).
To date,
we have completed drilling two exploratory wells in the Joseph License area and
are in the process of drilling one exploratory well in the Asher Menashe License
Area. The first exploratory well, named the Ma’anit #1 well, was drilled to a
depth of 15,842 feet (4,829 meters) to the Triassic formation with encouraging
but inconclusive results. However, notwithstanding these results, due to the
mechanical condition of the well-bore, we determined that the well was incapable
of producing oil and/or gas in commercial quantities and, consequently, in June
2007 we abandoned the well. In 2009, we drilled an additional well (the
Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well), ‘directionally’ to a depth of 17,913 feet (5,460
meters). The purpose of the Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well was both to appraise the
apparent findings of the Ma’anit #1 in the Triassic (at a depth of between
approximately 12,000 and 15,400 feet) and to test the deeper Permian horizons at
a depth of between approximately (16,000 and 18,000 feet). The well penetrated a
number of geologic formations that have been preliminarily deemed to have
hydrocarbon potential and, during the drilling, we retrieved a small quantity of
crude oil. In February 2010, we began completions/testing of the
Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well. In April 2010, following the completion
of testing procedures, we determined that commercial quantities of
hydrocarbons were not present in the Ma'anit-Rehoboth #2 well and, accordingly,
we suspended drilling operations in that well. In connection with
this decision, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge to our unproved oil
and gas properties for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
In
October 2009, utilizing the 2,000 horsepower drilling rig used to drill Zion’s
Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well, we commenced drilling an additional well (the Elijah
#3 well), within the Asher-Menashe License area, toward the Triassic geological
formation, which is expected below approximately 10,000 feet (3,048 meters). As
of February 2, 2010, we drilled to a depth of 10,938 feet (3,334 meters). In
early February 2010, we temporarily suspended drilling operations in the well
following our unsuccessful efforts to retrieve a stuck pipe pending further
analysis of the situation. The Company has recently acquired
approximately 32 kilometers of additional field seismic data that will hopefully
help to resolve certain questions regarding the geology of the area surrounding
the Elijah #3 well.
35
As the
Ma'anit-Rehoboth #2 well did not reach the Permian geological formation beneath
the Joseph license area, we are currently planning to drill a subsequent well,
named by us the "Ma'anit-Joseph #3 well" at a location near to the
Ma'anit-Rehoboth #2 well. The drilling of the Ma'anit-Joseph #3 well
is planned to test the Permian geological formation. We are in the process of
obtaining the requisite permits and have signed an agreement with the owners of
our current drilling rig to drill this future well. We are currently
constructing the well site platform and anticipate ‘spudding’ (commence
drilling) the well in August or September 2010.
Recent
Development
On July
15, 2010, our rights offering (the “Third Rights Offering”) expired. Under the
Third Rights Offering, we distributed to each holder of record as of close of
business on May 6, 2010, at no charge, .5 of a subscription right for each share
held as of such date (i.e., one subscription right for each two shares). Each
whole subscription right entitled the stockholder to purchase one share of
common stock at the purchase price of $5.00 per share. Shareholders who
exercised their rights in full were entitled to purchase additional shares
pursuant to an over-subscription right to the extent holders did not fully
subscribe for their basic subscription rights. The Third Rights offering,
originally scheduled to terminate on June 30, 2010, was extended to July 15,
2010. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had received subscriptions for
1,008,400 shares of common stock, resulting in proceeds of $5,042,000 at quarter
end. Between July 1, 2010 and July 15, 2010, the Company received
additional subscriptions of 1,462,717 shares of common stock, resulting in
additional proceeds of $7,313,585. In total, the Company received
subscriptions for a total of 2,471,117 shares, resulting in gross proceeds of
$12,355,585. After deducting $123,000 in offering costs, the Company
received net proceeds of $12,232,585. Net proceeds are being applied to the
Company’s drilling program and other operations.
Going
Concern Basis
Our
unaudited interim financial statements for the period ended June 30, 2010 have
been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates realization of assets
and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of
business. Since we are in the development stage, we have limited
capital resources, no revenue, and a loss from operations. The
appropriateness of using the going concern basis is dependent upon our ability
to obtain additional financing or equity capital and, ultimately, to achieve
profitable operations. The uncertainty of these conditions in the
past has raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern. The unaudited financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expense
during the reporting period.
We have
identified the accounting principles which we believe are most critical to the
reported financial status by considering accounting policies that involve the
most complex of subjective decisions or assessment.
36
Accounting
for Oil and Gas Properties
We follow
the full-cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties. Accordingly, all
costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas
reserves, including directly related overhead costs, are
capitalized.
All
capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, including the estimated future
costs to develop proved reserves, are amortized on the unit-of-production method
using estimates of proved reserves. Investments in unproved
properties and major development projects are not amortized until proved
reserves associated with the projects can be determined or until impairment
occurs. If the results of an assessment indicate that the properties are
impaired, the amount of the impairment is included in income from continuing
operations before income taxes and the adjusted carrying amount of the unproved
properties is amortized on the unit-of-production method.
The
Company’s oil and gas property represents an investment in unproved properties
and two major development projects on that property. These costs are
excluded from the amortized cost pool until proved reserves are found or until
it is determined that the costs are impaired. All costs excluded are
reviewed at least quarterly to determine if impairment has
occurred. The amount of any impairment is charged to expense since a
reserve base has not yet been established. A further impairment
requiring a charge to expense may be indicated through evaluation of drilling
results, relinquishing drilling rights or other information.
Abandonment
of properties is accounted for as adjustments to capitalized costs. The net
capitalized costs are subject to a “ceiling test” which limits such costs to the
aggregate of the estimated present value of future net revenues from proved
reserves discounted at ten percent based on current economic and operating
conditions, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of unproved properties.
The recoverability of amounts capitalized for oil and gas properties is
dependent upon the identification of economically recoverable reserves, together
with obtaining the necessary financing to exploit such reserves and the
achievement of profitable operations.
In June
2007, following the analysis of the results of the testing of the Company’s
Ma’anit #1 well workover and an evaluation of the mechanical condition of the
well, the Company determined that the well was incapable of producing oil and/or
gas in commercial quantities. In order to optimize drilling
operations on the Company’s planned Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well, the Company ceased
operations on the Ma’anit #1 well and, as required by the Petroleum Law,
formally relinquished the Ma’anit-Joseph License. Immediately after the
relinquishment of the Ma’anit-Joseph License, the Company filed an application
with the Petroleum Commissioner for a petroleum exploration license, the Joseph
License, covering approximately 83,272 acres of the original Ma’anit-Joseph
License including the Ma’anit structure on which the Ma’anit #1 well was
drilled, which license was subsequently granted on October 11,
2007. As a result of the abandonment of the Ma’anit #1 well and
formal relinquishment of the Ma’anit-Joseph License, the Company recorded in
June 2007 an impairment of $9,494,000 to its unproved oil and gas
properties.
37
As
planned, the Company used the Ma’anit #1 wellbore, down to approximately 9,842
feet (3,000 meters), as the upper part of the wellbore for the Ma’anit-Rehoboth
#2 well. This well was directionally drilled from that point to
penetrate the middle and the lower Triassic. The Company drilled this
well to a depth of 17,913 feet (5,460 meters) and, after initial testing of the
lower open hole section of the well using a workover rig, in December 2009,
conducted further testing of the well in 2010. Subsequent to drilling
the Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well and after analysis of all the data collected, we
identified several ‘zones of interest' warranting further investigation. In
February 2010, we began completion and production testing of the
Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well. In April 2010, following the completion of our testing
procedures, we determined that commercial quantities of hydrocarbons were not
present in the Ma'anit-Rehoboth #2 well and have accordingly suspended drilling
operations in that well. As a result, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge
of $22,022,000 to our unproved oil and gas properties for the quarter ending
June 30, 2010.
Financial
Statements in United States Dollars
Although
both our properties and our principal operations are in Israel, we report all
our transactions in United States dollars. Certain of the dollar amounts in the
financial statements may represent the dollar equivalent of other
currencies.
Accounting
for Income Taxes
We record
a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax asset to the amount that we
believe, is likely to be realized in the future. In assessing the
need for the valuation allowance we have considered not only future taxable
income but also feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. In the event that
we were to determine that it would be likely that we would, in the future,
realize our deferred tax assets in excess of the net recorded amount, an
adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be made. In the period
that such a determination was made, the adjustment to the deferred tax asset
would produce an increase in our net income.
We do not
participate in, nor have we created, any off-balance sheet special purpose
entities or other off-balance sheet financing. In addition, we do not enter into
any derivative financial instruments.
Asset
Retirement Obligation
We record
a liability for asset retirement obligation at fair value in the period in which
it is incurred and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the
related long lived assets.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We
believe that our currently available cash resources will be sufficient to enable
us to meet our operating requirements in carrying out our plans through December
2010. We will need to raise additional funds to maintain operations beyond that
date and in order to realize our business plan, including establishing Zion
Drilling, Inc. We will need to raise funds by attracting additional investment
in our company or additional parties to join our drilling operations. We have no
commitments for any such financing or participation and no assurance can be
provided that we will be successful in attracting any such
investment.
Our
working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) was $9,695,000 at
June 30, 2010 and $19,741,000 at December 31, 2009. The decrease in working
capital is primarily attributable to drilling-related
expenditures.
38
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded expenses paid, relating to the
second 2009 rights offering, in the amount of $13,000. Net cash used
for financing activities was $10,000 during the six month period ended June 30,
2010 compared to net cash provided of $23,373,000 during the six month period
ended June 30, 2009. The difference is attributable to proceeds from
the Second Rights Offering that closed during the period ended June 30,
2009. Net cash used for investment in the Company's unproved oil and
gas properties was $12,784,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
$4,603,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009; these amounts were
primarily drilling related expenditures.
On June
30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents in the amount of $9,579,000, compared
to $20,734,000 at December 31, 2009. On August 6, 2010, we had cash
and cash equivalents in the amount of $14,889,000. The decrease in
cash resources from December 31, 2009 compared to June 30, 2010 is primarily
attributable to costs related to the production testing of the Company’s Ma’anit
Rehoboth # 2 well and preparation costs related to the Company’s Ma’anit Joseph
# 3 well. The increase in cash resources as of August 6, 2010
compared to June 30, 2010 is primarily attributable to the results of our Third
Rights Offering.
To date,
we have funded our operations primarily through the issuance of our securities.
Our recent financings are discussed below.
Between
October 24, 2008 and January 9, 2009, we raised from a follow-on public offering
gross proceeds of $6,663,000 from the sale of units of our securities, of which
$240,000 was for debt conversion. Each unit offered in the follow-on
offering consisted of (i) one share of common stock, par value $.01 per share
and (ii) one warrant to purchase one share of common stock at a per share
exercise price equal to $7.00. We utilized the amounts raised in the follow on
public offering to commence drilling the above referenced Ma’anit Rehoboth #2
well.
In June
2009, we raised gross proceeds of $21 million from a rights offering to common
stockholders of up to 4.2 million shares of our common stock. The rights
offering was fully subscribed, resulting in our distribution of all of the 4.2
million shares that were offered.
In
November 2009, we raised an additional $18 million from a follow-on rights
offering to common stockholders of up to 3.6 million shares of our common stock.
The rights offering was fully subscribed, resulting in our distribution of all
of the 3.6 million shares that were offered.
Most
recently, in July 2010, we raised approximately $12.4 million from our 2010
Rights Offering discussed above under the caption "Recent
Development".
Results
of Operations
COMPARISON
OF THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 COMPARED TO THE THREE AND SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
Revenue. We have
no revenue generating operations as we are still an exploration stage
company.
39
General and administrative
expenses. General and administrative expenses were $23,444,000
and $24,801,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010,
respectively, compared to $1,347,000 and 2,342,000, respectively, for the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2009. The increase in general
and administrative expenses during each of the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2010 compared to the corresponding periods in 2009 is primarily
attributable to the impairment charge of $22,022,000 recorded during the three
months ended June 30, 2010 in respect of the Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well. Legal and
professional fees were $143,000 and $495,000 for the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $233,000 and $467,000,
respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009. The
decrease in legal and professional fees during the three months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the corresponding period in 2009 is primarily attributable to
additional legal fees incurred in the second quarter of 2009. The
increase in legal and professional fees during the six months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the corresponding period in 2009 is primarily attributable to
accounting fees incurred in connection with Sarbanes Oxley compliance
consultants. Salary expenses were $753,000 and $1,439,000 for the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 compared to $900,000 and
1,400,000 for the three and six months period ended June 30, 2009. The decrease
in salary expenses for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to
the corresponding period in 2009 is related to expense recognition of option
grants in the second quarter of 2009. The increase in salary expenses for the
six month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to the corresponding period in
2009 is related to the hiring of additional staff and
management. Other general and administrative expenses
were $526,000 and $845,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2010 compared to $214,000 and $475,000 for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2009. The increase in other general and administrative
expenses during each of the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 as
compared to the corresponding periods in 2009 is attributable to increased
investor relations efforts and related travel costs.
Interest income/Expense,
net. Interest income/Expense, net was ($82,000) and ($85,000)
for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 as compared to $15,000
and $18,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The
decline in interest income was due to a decline in the interest rates being paid
on cash balances by the banks as well as a significant currency exchange loss in
an amount of approximately $88,000. Interest expense for these
periods was negligible.
Net
Loss. Net loss was $23,526,000 and $24,886,000 for the
three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 compared to $1,332,000 and
$2,248,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009. The increase
in net loss during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the
corresponding periods in 2009 is attributable to the impairment charge being
recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2010 in respect of the
Ma’anit-Rehoboth #2 well.
ITEM
3.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
Market
risk is a broad term for the risk of economic loss due to adverse changes in the
fair value of a financial instrument. These changes may be the result of various
factors, including interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices
and/or equity prices. In the normal course of doing business, we are exposed to
the risks associated with foreign currency exchange rates and changes in
interest rates.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate
Risks. A portion of our expenses, primarily labor expenses and certain
supplier contracts, are nominated in New Israeli Shekels “NIS”. As a result, we
have significant exposure to the risk of fluctuating exchange rates with the US
Dollar, our primary reporting currency. The recent weakness of the US Dollar in
the international markets has been equally reflected against NIS and this may
continue in the future. Since December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, to the current
date, the US Dollar has devalued by approximately 1%, 2% and 11% respectively
against the NIS. Continuing devaluation of the US dollar against the NIS will
result in higher operating costs from NIS denominated expenses. We do not
currently hedge against currency exchange rate risks.
40
Interest Rate
Risk. Our exposure to market risk relates to our cash and
investments. We maintain an investment portfolio of short term bank deposits and
money market funds. The securities in our investment portfolio are not
leveraged, and are, due to their very short-term nature, subject to minimal
interest rate risk. We currently do not hedge interest rate exposure. Because of
the short-term maturities of our investments, we do not believe that a change in
market interest rates would have a significant negative impact on the value of
our investment portfolio except for reduced income in a low interest rate
environment. At June 30, 2010, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities of approximately $9,579,000. The weighted average annual
interest rate related to our cash and cash equivalents for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 was approximately 1%.
The
primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at
the same time maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. To
achieve this objective, we invest our excess cash in short-term bank deposits
and money market funds that may invest in high quality debt
instruments.
ITEM
4.
|
CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
|
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time period specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. As of June 30, 2010, our chief executive officer and our
chief financial officer conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our chief
executive officer and our chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2010.
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, there have been no changes in our internal
controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, these controls.
PART
II—OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM
1A. RISK
FACTORS
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, there were no material changes to the risk
factors previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF
SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
41
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR
SECURITIES
None.
ITEM
4. (REMOVED
AND RESERVED)
ITEM
5. OTHER
INFORMATION
None.
ITEM
6.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit Index:
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 under the Exchange Act
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (furnished only).
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 o4f the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (furnished
only).
|
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
ZION
OIL & GAS, INC.
|
||||
(Registrant)
|
||||
By:
|
/s/ Richard J. Rinberg
|
By:
|
/s/ Kent S. Siegel
|
|
Richard
J. Rinberg
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
Kent
S. Siegel,
Senior
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|||
Date:
|
August
9, 2010
|
Date:
|
August
9, 2010
|
43