AGREE REALTY CORP - Quarter Report: 2007 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Mark One
þ | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
OR
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For
the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 1-12928
Agree Realty Corporation
Maryland | 38-3148187 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
31850 Northwestern Highway, Farmington Hills, Michigan | 48334 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (248) 737-4190
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer þ Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of November 7, 2007, the Registrant had 7,751,746 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value,
outstanding.
Agree Realty Corporation
Form
10-Q
Index
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Real Estate Investments |
||||||||
Land |
$ | 81,868,958 | $ | 77,536,458 | ||||
Buildings |
193,827,554 | 189,117,421 | ||||||
Property under development |
4,524,364 | 1,593,828 | ||||||
280,220,876 | 268,247,707 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(52,020,712 | ) | (48,352,753 | ) | ||||
Net real estate investments |
228,200,164 | 219,894,954 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
146,354 | 463,730 | ||||||
Accounts Receivable Tenants, net of allowance of $20,000
for possible losses at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 |
337,595 | 732,141 | ||||||
Unamortized Deferred Expenses |
||||||||
Financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $4,620,272
and $4,482,272 at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 |
881,905 | 1,019,905 | ||||||
Leasing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $703,053
and $665,811 at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 |
404,095 | 421,229 | ||||||
Other Assets |
822,517 | 982,640 | ||||||
$ | 230,792,630 | $ | 223,514,599 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Mortgages Payable |
$ | 46,424,292 | $ | 48,291,247 | ||||
Notes Payable |
30,150,000 | 20,500,000 | ||||||
Dividends and Distributions Payable |
4,124,455 | 4,111,807 | ||||||
Deferred Revenue |
11,586,793 | 12,103,954 | ||||||
Accrued Interest Payable |
356,641 | 239,318 | ||||||
Accounts Payable |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
1,320,612 | 766,378 | ||||||
Operating |
353,093 | 1,140,617 | ||||||
Tenant Deposits |
64,085 | 64,085 | ||||||
Total Liabilities |
94,379,971 | 87,217,406 | ||||||
Minority Interest |
5,829,486 | 5,878,593 | ||||||
Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Common
stock, $0.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized, |
||||||||
7,751,746 and 7,750,496 shares issued and outstanding |
775 | 775 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
142,013,723 | 141,276,763 | ||||||
Deficit |
(11,431,325 | ) | (10,858,938 | ) | ||||
Total Stockholders Equity |
130,583,173 | 130,418,600 | ||||||
$ | 230,792,630 | $ | 223,514,599 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2007 | September 30, 2006 | |||||||
Revenues |
||||||||
Minimum rents |
$ | 7,754,457 | $ | 7,452,909 | ||||
Percentage rents |
13,778 | 13,606 | ||||||
Operating cost reimbursements |
681,445 | 638,900 | ||||||
Other income |
24 | 8,545 | ||||||
Total Revenues |
8,449,704 | 8,113,960 | ||||||
Operating Expenses
|
||||||||
Real estate taxes |
467,714 | 449,823 | ||||||
Property operating expenses |
380,541 | 389,237 | ||||||
Land lease payments |
168,550 | 195,465 | ||||||
General and administrative |
965,942 | 1,005,902 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,259,462 | 1,212,660 | ||||||
Total Operating Expenses |
3,242,209 | 3,253,087 | ||||||
Income From Operations |
5,207,495 | 4,860,873 | ||||||
Other (Expense) |
||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(1,280,051 | ) | (1,156,949 | ) | ||||
Income Before Minority Interest |
3,927,444 | 3,703,924 | ||||||
Minority Interest |
(314,200 | ) | (297,797 | ) | ||||
Net Income |
$ | 3,613,244 | $ | 3,406,127 | ||||
Earnings Per Share Basic |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.45 | ||||
Earnings Per Share Dilutive |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.44 | ||||
Dividend Declared Per Share |
$ | 0.49 | $ | 0.49 | ||||
Weighted Average Number of
Common Shares Outstanding Basic |
7,643,708 | 7,607,808 | ||||||
Weighted Average Number of
Common Shares Outstanding Dilutive |
7,692,118 | 7,672,549 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2007 | September 30, 2006 | |||||||
Revenues |
||||||||
Minimum rents |
$ | 23,084,371 | $ | 22,415,582 | ||||
Percentage rents |
29,804 | 40,891 | ||||||
Operating cost reimbursements |
2,163,902 | 2,060,329 | ||||||
Other income |
12,645 | 37,026 | ||||||
Total Revenues |
25,290,722 | 24,553,828 | ||||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||
Real estate taxes |
1,392,222 | 1,351,988 | ||||||
Property operating expenses |
1,327,150 | 1,317,509 | ||||||
Land lease payments |
507,150 | 586,395 | ||||||
General and administrative |
2,937,604 | 3,078,733 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,756,111 | 3,618,495 | ||||||
Total Operating Expenses |
9,920,237 | 9,953,120 | ||||||
Income From Operations |
15,370,485 | 14,600,708 | ||||||
Other (Expense) |
||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(3,608,021 | ) | (3,449,164 | ) | ||||
Income Before Minority Interest |
11,762,464 | 11,151,544 | ||||||
Minority Interest |
(941,009 | ) | (896,588 | ) | ||||
Net Income |
$ | 10,821,455 | $ | 10,254,956 | ||||
Earnings
Per Share Basic |
$ | 1.42 | $ | 1.35 | ||||
Earnings
Per Share Dilutive |
$ | 1.41 | $ | 1.34 | ||||
Dividend Declared Per Common Share |
$ | 1.47 | $ | 1.47 | ||||
Weighted Average Number of
Common Shares Outstanding Basic |
7,642,924 | 7,603,837 | ||||||
Weighted Average Number of
Common Shares Outstanding Dilutive |
7,697,212 | 7,666,366 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
4
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (Unaudited)
Additional | ||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-In | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | |||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2007 |
7,750,496 | $ | 775 | $ | 141,276,763 | $ | (10,858,938 | ) | ||||||||
Issuance of shares under the Equity
Incentive Plan |
1,250 | | | | ||||||||||||
Vesting of restricted stock |
| | 736,960 | | ||||||||||||
Dividends declared for the period
January 1, 2007 to September
30, 2007 |
| | | (11,393,842 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income for the period
January 1, 2007 to September
30, 2007 |
| | | 10,821,455 | ||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2007 |
7,751,746 | $ | 775 | $ | 142,013,723 | $ | (11,431,325 | ) | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2007 | September 30, 2006 | |||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 10,821,455 | $ | 10,254,956 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities |
||||||||
Depreciation |
3,713,205 | 3,580,590 | ||||||
Amortization |
180,906 | 130,905 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
736,960 | 627,000 | ||||||
Minority interests |
941,009 | 896,588 | ||||||
Decrease in accounts receivable |
394,546 | 325,159 | ||||||
Decrease in other assets |
109,213 | 357,952 | ||||||
Decrease in accounts payable |
(787,524 | ) | (1,022,279 | ) | ||||
Decrease in deferred revenue |
(517,161 | ) | (517,162 | ) | ||||
Increase in accrued interest |
117,323 | 20,104 | ||||||
Increase in tenant deposits |
| 6,078 | ||||||
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities |
15,709,932 | 14,659,891 | ||||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
||||||||
Acquisition of real estate investments
(including capitalized interest of $401,000
in 2007 and $111,000 in 2006) |
(10,652,557 | ) | (4,168,937 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities |
(10,652,557 | ) | (4,168,937 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
||||||||
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock |
| 95,550 | ||||||
Payments of mortgages payable |
(1,866,955 | ) | (1,807,899 | ) | ||||
Dividends and distributions paid |
(12,371,310 | ) | (12,302,459 | ) | ||||
Line-of-credit net borrowings (payments) |
9,650,000 | (1,850,000 | ) | |||||
Repayments of capital expenditure payables |
(766,378 | ) | (112,687 | ) | ||||
Payment of leasing costs |
(20,108 | ) | (63,707 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities |
(5,374,751 | ) | (16,041,202 | ) | ||||
Net Decrease In Cash and Cash Equivalents |
(317,376 | ) | (5,550,248 | ) | ||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period |
463,730 | 5,714,540 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period |
$ | 146,354 | $ | 164,292 | ||||
6
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2007 | September 30, 2006 | |||||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest (net of amounts capitalized) |
$ | 3,378,355 | $ | 3,337,297 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Transactions |
||||||||
Dividends and distributions declared and unpaid |
$ | 4,124,455 | $ | 4,110,764 | ||||
Shares issued under Equity Incentive Plan |
$ | 40,062 | $ | 149,989 | ||||
Real estate investments financed with accounts payable |
$ | 1,320,612 | $ | 864,778 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of
Presentation
|
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007 or for any other interim period. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. | |
2. Stock Based
Compensation
|
On January 1, 2006, Agree Realty Corporation (the n Company) adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payments (SFAS 123R), under the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized for all awards granted after the adoption of this standard and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that are outstanding as of the adoption date. In accordance with SFAS 123R, the Company estimates the fair value of restricted stock and stock option grants at the date of grant and amortize those amounts into expense on a straight line basis or amount vested, if greater, over the appropriate vesting period. | |
As of September 30, 2007, there was $2,571,447 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to the outstanding restricted shares, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.83 years. The Company used a 0% discount factor and forfeiture rate for determining the fair value of restricted stock. The forfeiture rate was based on historical results and trends and the Company does not consider discount rates to be material. | ||
The holder of a restricted share award is generally entitled at all times on and after the date of issuance of the restricted shares to exercise the rights of a shareholder of the Company, including the right to vote the shares and the right to receive dividends on the shares. |
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Shares | Grant Date | |||||||
Outstanding | Fair Value | |||||||
Unvested restricted shares at December 31, 2006 |
131,120 | $ | 29.42 | |||||
Restricted shares granted |
1,250 | 32.05 | ||||||
Restricted shares vested |
(24,400 | ) | 24.47 | |||||
Restricted shares forfeited |
| | ||||||
Unvested restricted shares at September 30, 2007 |
107,970 | $ | 30.57 | |||||
8
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
3. Earnings Per
Share
|
Earnings per share has been computed by dividing the net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The per share amounts reflected in the consolidated statements of income are presented in accordance with SFAS No. 128 Earnings per Share. | |
The following is a reconciliation of the denominator of the basic net earnings per common share computation to the denominator of the diluted net earnings per common share computation for each of the periods presented: |
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
7,751,678 | 7,712,828 | ||||||
Unvested restricted stock |
(107,970 | ) | (105,020 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding used in basic earnings per share |
7,643,708 | 7,607,808 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding used in basic earnings per share |
7,643,708 | 7,607,808 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||
Restricted stock |
48,410 | 63,394 | ||||||
Common stock options |
| 1,347 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding used in diluted earnings per share |
7,692,118 | 7,672,549 | ||||||
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
7,750,894 | 7,708,857 | ||||||
Unvested restricted stock |
(107,970 | ) | (105,020 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding used in basic earnings per share |
7,642,924 | 7,603,837 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding used in basic earnings per share |
7,642,924 | 7,603,837 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||
Restricted stock |
54,288 | 61,244 | ||||||
Common stock options |
| 1,285 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding used in diluted earnings per share |
7,697,212 | 7,666,366 | ||||||
4.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), to clarify the accounting treatment for uncertain income tax positions when applying FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a financial statement recognition threshold and measurement attribute for any tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48. Upon adoption and as of September 30, 2007, there was no unrecognized income tax benefit and the adoption of FIN 48 had no effect on stockholders equity. The Company expects no significant increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits due to changes in tax positions within one year of September 30, 2007. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. At January 1, 2007 and September 30, 2007, the Company had accrued zero for the payment of tax related interest and penalties and there was no tax interest or penalties recognized in the statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. The Companys federal, state and local tax returns for fiscal years 2003-2006 remain subject to examination. |
9
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and expands the disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The definition focuses on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability at the measurement date (an exit price) and not the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability at the measurement date (an entry price). This statement also emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity specific measurement, and subsequently a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The statement also clarifies the market participant assumptions about risk and the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. This statement will be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this statement is initially applied. A limited form of retrospective application of SFAS No. 157 is allowed for certain financial instruments. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS No. 157 to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on the Companys financial position or results of operations. | ||
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). This statement permits companies and not-for-profit organizations to make a one-time election to carry eligible types of financial assets and liabilities at fair value, even if fair value measurement is not required under GAAP. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS No. 159 to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on the Companys financial position or results of operations. | ||
5. Other Taxes
|
In July 2007, the State of Michigan signed into law the Michigan Business Tax Act, replacing the Michigan single business tax with a business income tax and modified gross receipts tax. These new taxes take effect on January 1, 2008, and, because they are based on or derived from income-based measures, the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, apply as of the enactment date. In September 2007, the State of Michigan also enacted a new services tax law that takes effect on December 1, 2007. There is substantial uncertainty as to the applicability of the new law to certain of the Companys transactions and services, as well as the treatment of various items in the computation of the tax. The Company is currently evaluating the possible effects, if any, of the new taxes on future results of operations and closely monitoring local efforts aimed at clarifying, amending, and/or repealing the law. |
10
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Forward-Looking Statements
Management has included herein certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). These forward-looking statements represent
our expectations, plans and beliefs concerning future events and may be identified by terminology
such as anticipate, estimate, should, expect, believe, intend and similar
expressions. Although the forward-looking statements made in this report are based on good faith
beliefs, reasonable assumptions and our best judgment reflecting current information, certain
factors could cause actual results to differ materially from such forwardlooking statements,
including but not limited to; the effect of economic and market conditions; risks that our
acquisition and development projects will fail to perform as expected; financing risks, such as
the inability to obtain debt or equity financing on favorable terms; the level and volatility of
interest rates; loss or bankruptcy of one or more of our major retail tenants; a failure of our
properties to generate additional income to offset increases in operating expenses; and other
factors discussed elsewhere in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, including our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking
statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forwardlooking
statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.
Overview
Agree Realty Corporation is a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate
investment trust (REIT) focused primarily on the ownership, development and management of
retail properties net leased to national tenants. We were formed in December 1993 to continue
and expand the business founded in 1971 by our current President and Chairman, Richard Agree. We
specialize in developing retail properties for national tenants who have executed long-term net
leases prior to the commencement of construction. As of September 30, 2007, approximately 89% of
our annualized base rent was derived from national tenants. All of our freestanding property
tenants and the majority of our community shopping center tenants have triple-net leases, which
require the tenant to be responsible for property operating expenses, including property taxes,
insurance and maintenance. We believe this strategy provides a generally consistent source of
income and cash for distributions.
As of September 30, 2007, our portfolio consisted of 61 properties, located in 15 states
containing an aggregate of approximately 3.4 million square feet of gross leasable area (GLA).
As of September 30, 2007, our portfolio included 49 freestanding net leased properties and 12
community shopping centers that were 99.7% leased in aggregate. As of September 30, 2007,
approximately 67% of our annualized base rent was derived from our top three tenants: Borders
Group, Inc. 32%; Walgreen Co. (Walgreens) 23% and Kmart Corporation 12%.
We expect to continue to grow our asset base primarily through the development of retail
properties that are pre-leased on a long-term basis to national tenants. We focus on development
because we believe, based on the historical returns we have been able to achieve, it generally
provides us a higher return on investment than the acquisition of similarly located properties
and does not entail the risks associated with speculative development. Since our initial public
offering in 1994, we have developed 48 of our 61 properties, including 36 of our 49 freestanding
properties and all 12 of our community shopping centers. As of September 30, 2007, the
properties that we developed accounted for 82.8%
of our annualized base rent. We expect to continue to expand our tenant relationships and
diversify our tenant base to include other quality national tenants.
During October 2007, we announced that we would develop two additional projects located in Marion
County, Florida and Shelby Township, Michigan, respectively. Budgeted costs for the Florida and
Michigan developments are $3.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively, and the developments are
expected to be completed during the 2nd quarter of
11
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
2008. During October 2007, we also
completed the sale of our interest in a contract to acquire a 14.9 acre parcel of land to a
national home improvement superstore. The transaction resulted in a gain of approximately $1.5
million.
Our assets are held by, and all operations are conducted through, Agree Limited Partnership (the
Operating Partnership), of which Agree Realty Corporation is the sole general partner and held
a 92.01% and 92.00% interest as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. We are
operating so as to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
The following should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of Agree
Realty Corporation, including the respective notes thereto, which are included in this Form 10-Q.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), to clarify the accounting treatment
for uncertain income tax positions when applying FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a financial statement recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for any tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted
FIN 48. Upon adoption and as of September 30, 2007, there was no unrecognized income tax
benefit and the adoption of FIN 48 had no effect on stockholders equity. We do not expect any
significant increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits due to changes in tax positions
within one year of September 30, 2007. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. At January 1, 2007 and September 30, 2007, we had
accrued zero for the payment of tax related interest and penalties and there was no tax interest
or penalties recognized in the statements of operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007. Our federal, state and local tax returns for fiscal years 2003-2006 remain
subject to examination.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and expands the disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit
fair value measurements. The definition focuses on the price that would be received to sell the
asset or paid to transfer the liability at the measurement date (an exit price) and not the price
that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability at the measurement
date (an entry price). This statement also emphasizes that fair value is a market-based
measurement, not an entity specific measurement, and subsequently a fair value measurement should
be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. The statement also clarifies the market participant assumptions about risk and the
effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. This statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. This statement will be applied prospectively as of the
beginning of the fiscal year in which this statement is initially applied. A limited form of
retrospective application of SFAS No. 157 is allowed for certain financial instruments. We are
currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS No. 157 to determine the potential impact, if any,
the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our financial position or results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). This statement permits companies and not-for-profit
organizations to make a one-time election to carry eligible types of financial assets and
liabilities at fair value, even if fair value measurement is not required under GAAP. SFAS 159
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently
evaluating the provisions of SFAS No. 159 to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption
of SFAS No. 159 will have on our financial position or results of operations.
12
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are those that are both significant to the overall presentation of
our financial condition and results of operations and require management to make difficult,
complex or subjective judgments. For example, significant estimates and assumptions have been
made with respect to revenue recognition, capitalization of costs related to real estate
investments, potential impairment of real estate investments, operating cost reimbursements, and
taxable income.
Minimum rental income attributable to leases is recorded when due from tenants. Certain leases
provide for additional percentage rents based on tenants sales volumes. These percentage rents
are recognized when determinable by us. In addition, leases for certain tenants contain rent
escalations and/or free rent during the first several months of the lease term; however such
amounts are generally not material.
Real estate assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. All costs related to
planning, development and construction of buildings prior to the date they become operational,
including interest and real estate taxes during the construction period, are capitalized for
financial reporting purposes and recorded as property under development until construction has
been completed. Subsequent to the completion of construction, expenditures for property
maintenance are charged to operations as incurred, while significant renovations are capitalized.
Depreciation of the buildings is recorded in accordance with the straight-line method using an
estimated useful life of 40 years.
In determining the fair value of real estate investments, we consider future cash flow
projections on a property by property basis, current interest rates and current market conditions
of the geographical location of each property.
Substantially all of our leases contain provisions requiring tenants to pay as additional rent a
proportionate share of operating expenses (operating cost reimbursements) such as real estate
taxes, repairs and maintenance, insurance, etc. The related revenue from tenant billings is
recognized in the same period the expense is recorded.
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), commencing with our 1994 tax year. As a result, we are not subject to federal income
taxes to the extent that we distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our
stockholders and satisfy certain other requirements defined in the Code. Accordingly, no
provision was made for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 to Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
Minimum rental income increased $301,000, or 4%, to $7,754,000 in 2007, compared to $7,453,000 in
2006. The increase was primarily the result of the development of a Walgreens at our Capital
Plaza shopping center in December 2006, the acquisition of a Rite Aid drug store in Summit
Township, Michigan in September 2006, and the development of a Walgreens in Livonia, Michigan
which opened in June of 2007.
Percentage rental income remained constant at $14,000 in 2007 and 2006.
Operating cost reimbursements increased $42,000, or 7%, to $681,000 in 2007, compared to $639,000
in 2006. Operating cost reimbursements increased due to the increase in property operating
expenses as explained below and a higher recovery ratio.
Other income decreased $9,000, to $-0- in 2007.
Real estate taxes increased $18,000, or 4%, to $468,000 in 2007, compared to $450,000 in 2006.
The increase was the result of general assessment adjustments.
Property operating expenses (shopping center maintenance, snow removal, insurance and utilities)
decreased $8,000, or 2%, to $381,000 in 2007 compared to $389,000 in 2006. The net decrease was
the result of: a decrease in shopping
13
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
center maintenance costs of ($6,000); an increase in
utility costs of $4,000; and a decrease in insurance costs of ($6,000) in 2007 versus 2006.
Land lease payments decreased $26,000, or 14%, to $169,000 in 2007 compared to $195,000 in 2006.
The decrease was the result of our purchase of the fee interest in the land located at our
Lawrence, Kansas property previously leased.
General and administrative expenses decreased by $40,000, or 4%, to $966,000 in 2007, compared to
$1,006,000 in 2006. The net decrease was the result of increased compensation related expenses as
a result of: an increase in salaries and the value of employee stock awards of $44,000; a
decrease in contracted services to investigate development opportunities of ($24,000); a decrease
in legal and auditing costs of ($44,000); and a decrease in property related expenses of
($16,000). General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total rental income (minimum
and percentage rents) decreased from 13.5% for 2006 to 12.4% for 2007.
Depreciation and amortization increased $46,000, or 4%, to $1,259,000 in 2007, compared to
$1,213,000 in 2006. The increase was the result of the development and acquisition of two
properties in 2006 and the development of one property in 2007.
Interest expense increased $123,000, or 11%, to $1,280,000 in 2007, from $1,157,000 in 2006. The
increase in interest expense resulted from increased borrowings to fund the development and
acquisition of the two properties in 2006 and the development of one property in 2007.
Our income before minority interest increased $223,000, or 6%, to $3,927,000 in 2007 from
$3,704,000 in 2006 as a result of the foregoing factors.
Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
Minimum rental income increased $668,000, or 3%, to $23,084,000 in 2007, compared to $22,416,000
in 2006. The increase was primarily the result of the development of a Walgreens at our Capital
Plaza shopping center in December 2006,; the acquisition of a Rite Aid drug store in Summit
Township, Michigan in September 2006 and the development of a Walgreens in Livonia, Michigan
which opened in June 2007.
Percentage rental income decreased $11,000, to $30,000 in 2007, compared to $41,000 in 2006. The
decrease was the result of decreased tenant sales.
Operating cost reimbursements increased $104,000, or 5%, to $2,164,000 in 2007, compared to
$2,060,000 in 2006. Operating cost reimbursements increased due to the increase in property
operating expenses as explained below and a higher recovery ratio.
Other income decreased $24,000 to $13,000 in 2007, compared to $37,000 in 2006.
Real estate taxes increased $40,000, or 3%, to $1,392,000 in 2007, compared to $1,352,000 in
2006. The increase was the result of general assessment adjustments.
Property operating expenses (shopping center maintenance, snow removal, insurance and utilities)
increased $9,000, or 1%, to $1,327,000 in 2007 compared to $1,318,000 in 2006. The net increase
was the result of: decreased shopping center maintenance costs of ($6,000); an increase in snow
removal costs of $5,000; an increase in utility costs of $12,000; and a decrease in insurance
costs of ($2,000) in 2007 versus 2006.
Land lease payments decreased $79,000, or 14%, to $507,000 in 2007 compared to $586,000 in 2006.
The decrease was the result of our purchase of the fee interest in the land located at our
Lawrence, Kansas property previously leased.
14
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
General and administrative expenses decreased by $141,000, or 5%, to $2,938,000 in 2007, compared
to $3,079,000 in 2006. The net decrease was the result of increased compensation related expenses
as a result of: an increase in salaries and the value of employee stock awards of $144,000; a
decrease in contracted services to investigate development opportunities of ($51,000); a decrease
in legal and auditing costs of ($157,000); and a decrease in property related expenses of
($77,000). General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total rental income decreased
from 13.7% for 2006 to 12.7% for 2007.
Depreciation and amortization increased $138,000, or 4%, to $3,756,000 in 2007, compared to
$3,618,000 in 2006. The increase was the result of the development and acquisition of two
properties in 2006 and the development of one property in 2007.
Interest expense increased $159,000, or 5%, to $3,608,000 in 2007, from $3,449,000 in 2006. The
increase in interest expense resulted from increased borrowings to fund the development and
acquisition of the two properties in 2006 and the development of one property in 2007.
Our income before minority interest increased $610,000, or 5%, to $11,762,000 in 2007 from
$11,152,000 in 2006 as a result of the foregoing factors.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal demands for liquidity are distributions to our stockholders, debt repayment,
development of new properties, redevelopment of existing properties and future property
acquisitions. We intend to meet our short-term liquidity requirements, including capital
expenditures related to the leasing and improvement of the properties, through cash flow provided
by operations and the Line of Credit and the Credit Facility. We believe that adequate cash flow
will be available to fund our operations and pay dividends in accordance with REIT requirements
for at least the next 12 months. We may obtain additional funds for future development or
acquisitions through other borrowings or the issuance of additional shares of common stock. We
intend to incur additional debt in a manner consistent with our policy of maintaining a ratio of
total debt (including construction and acquisition financing) to total market capitalization of
65% or less. We believe that these financing sources will enable us to generate funds sufficient
to meet both our short-term and long-term capital needs.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share.
We paid the dividend on October 11, 2007 to holders of record on September 28, 2007.
As of September 30, 2007, we had total mortgage indebtedness of $46,424,292 with a weighted
average interest rate of 6.64%. This mortgage debt is all fixed rate debt.
In addition, the Operating Partnership has in place a $50 million credit facility (the Credit
Facility) with LaSalle Bank, as the agent, which is guaranteed by the Company. The Credit
Facility matures in November 2009 and can be extended at our option subject to specified
conditions, for two additional one-year periods. Advances under the Credit Facility bear
interest within a range of one-month to twelve-month LIBOR plus 100 basis points to 150 basis
points or the lenders prime rate, at our option, based on certain factors such as the ratio of
our indebtedness to the capital value of our properties. The Credit Facility generally is used
to fund property acquisitions and development activities. As of September 30, 2007, $26,500,000
was outstanding under the Credit Facility bearing a weighted average interest rate of 6.38%.
We also have in place a $5 million line of credit (the Line of Credit), which matures in
November 2009, and can be extended extended at our option subject to specified conditions for two
additional one year periods. The Line of Credit bears interest at the lenders prime rate less
75 basis points or 150 basis points in excess of the one-month to twelve-month LIBOR rate, at our
option. The purpose of the Line of Credit is generally to provide working capital and fund land
options and start-up costs associated with new projects. As of September 30, 2007, $3,650,000
was outstanding under the Line of Credit bearing a weighted average interest rate of 7.00%.
15
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
The following table outlines our contractual obligations for the periods presented below (in
thousands).
Oct. 1, 2007 - | Oct. 1, 2008 - | Oct. 1, 2010 - | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | Sep. 30, 2008 | Sep. 30, 2010 | Sep. 30, 2012 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgages Payable |
$ | 46,424 | $ | 2,709 | $ | 5,975 | $ | 6,818 | $ | 30,922 | ||||||||||
Notes Payable |
30,150 | | 30,150 | | | |||||||||||||||
Land Lease Obligation |
11,272 | 674 | 1,305 | 1,387 | 7,906 | |||||||||||||||
Interest Payments on |
25,319 | 4,834 | 7,688 | 4,595 | 8,202 | |||||||||||||||
Mortgages And Notes
Payable |
||||||||||||||||||||
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 113,165 | $ | 8,217 | $ | 45,118 | $ | 12,800 | $ | 47,030 | ||||||||||
At September 30, 2007 we had four development projects under construction that will add an
additional 43,290 square feet of GLA to our portfolio. The projects are expected to be completed
during the fourth quarter of 2007 and the first quarter of 2008. Additional funding required to
complete the projects is estimated to be $4,659,000, which is not reflected in the table above,
and will be funded through advances under the Credit Facility.
During October 2007, we announced that we would develop two additional projects located in Marion
County, Florida and Shelby Township, Michigan, respectively. Budgeted costs for the Florida and
Michigan developments are $3.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively, and the developments are
expected to be completed during the second quarter of 2008. These development
projects will also be funded through advances under the Credit Facility.
During October 2007, we completed the sale of our interest in a contract to acquire a 14.9 acre
parcel of land to a national home improvement superstore. The transaction resulted in a gain of
approximately $1.5 million. We established a taxable REIT subsidiary to facilitate this
transaction. We expect to elect to defer the recognition of the gain from the transaction for
income tax purposes by making an election under Section 1031 of the Code.
We plan to begin construction of additional pre-leased developments and may acquire additional
properties, which will initially be financed by the Credit Facility and Line of Credit. We will
periodically refinance short-term construction and acquisition financing with long-term debt
and/or equity.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not engage in any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or financial
partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities, that have or are reasonably
likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition,
revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditure or capital resources.
Inflation
Our leases generally contain provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on
net income. These provisions include clauses enabling the us to pass through to tenants certain
operating costs, including real estate taxes, common area maintenance, utilities and insurance,
thereby reducing the our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from
inflation. Certain of our leases contain clauses enabling us to receive percentage rents based on
tenants gross sales, which generally increase as prices rise, and, in certain cases, escalation
clauses, which generally increase rental rates during the terms of the leases. In addition,
expiring tenant leases permit us to seek increased rents upon re-lease at market rates if rents
are below the then existing market rates.
16
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
Other Taxes
In July 2007, the State of Michigan signed into law the Michigan Business Tax Act, replacing the
Michigan single business tax with a business income tax and modified gross receipts tax. These
new taxes take effect on January 1, 2008, and, because they are based on or derived from
income-based measures, the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, apply as of
the enactment date. In September 2007, the State of Michigan also enacted a new services tax law
that takes effect on December 1, 2007. There is substantial uncertainty as to the applicability
of the new law to certain of the Companys transactions and services, as well as the treatment of
various items in the computation of the tax. The Company is currently evaluating the possible
effects, if any, of the new taxes on future results of operations and closely monitoring local
efforts aimed at clarifying, amending, and/or repealing the law.
Funds from Operations
Funds from Operations (FFO) is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts, Inc. (NAREIT) to mean net income computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or
losses) from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management uses FFO as a
supplemental measure to conduct and evaluate our business because there are certain limitations
associated with using GAAP net income by itself as the primary measure of our operating
performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP
implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since
real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, management
believes that the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical
cost accounting is insufficient by itself.
FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income as the primary indicator of our
operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. Further, while
we adhere to the NAREIT definition of FFO, our presentation of FFO is not necessarily comparable
to similarly titled measures of other REITs due to the fact that not all REITs use the same
definition.
The following tables illustrate the calculation of FFO for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,613,244 | $ | 3,406,127 | ||||
Depreciation of real estate assets |
1,229,708 | 1,185,432 | ||||||
Amortization of leasing costs |
12,550 | 11,751 | ||||||
Minority interest |
314,200 | 297,797 | ||||||
Funds from Operations |
$ | 5,169,702 | $ | 4,901,107 | ||||
Weighted Average Shares and
Operating Partnership Units
Outstanding Dilutive |
8,365,665 | 8,346,096 | ||||||
17
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 10,821,455 | $ | 10,254,956 | ||||
Depreciation of real estate assets |
3,673,623 | 3,540,228 | ||||||
Amortization of leasing costs |
37,242 | 32,241 | ||||||
Minority interest |
941,009 | 896,588 | ||||||
Funds from Operations |
$ | 15,473,329 | $ | 14,724,013 | ||||
Weighted Average Shares and
Operating Partnership Units
Outstanding Dilutive |
8,370,759 | 8,339,913 | ||||||
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily through borrowing activities. There is inherent
roll-over risk for borrowings as they mature and are renewed at current market rates. The extent
of this risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest
rates and our future financing requirements.
Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the
principal payments (in thousands) and the weighted average interest rates on outstanding debt, by
year of expected maturity, to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate
changes.
Year Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt |
$ | 2,709 | $ | 2,889 | $ | 3,086 | $ | 3,297 | $ | 3,521 | $ | 30,922 | $ | 46,424 | ||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
6.64 | % | 6.64 | % | 6.64 | % | 6.64 | % | 6.64 | % | 6.64 | % | | |||||||||||||||
Variable rate debt |
| | $ | 30,150 | | | | $ | 30,150 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
| | 6.46 | % | | | | |
The fair value (in thousands) is estimated at $46,500 and $30,150 for fixed rate debt and
variable rate debt, respectively, as of
September 30, 2007.
September 30, 2007.
The table above incorporates those exposures that exist as of September 30, 2007; it does not
consider those exposures or positions, which could arise after that date. As a result, our
ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the
exposures that arise during the period and interest rates.
We do not enter into financial instrument transactions for trading or other speculative purposes
or to manage interest rate exposure.
As of September 30, 2007, a 10% adverse change in interest rates on the portion of our debt
bearing interest at variable rates would result in an increase in interest expense of
approximately $196,000.
18
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
At December 31, 2006, management identified the following material weakness in our internal
controls:
| We lack segregation of duties in the period-end financial reporting process. Our chief financial officer is the only employee with any significant knowledge of generally accepted accounting principles. The chief financial officer is also the sole employee in charge of the general ledger (including the preparation of routine and non-routine journal entries and journal entries involving accounting estimates), the preparation of accounting reconciliations, the selection of accounting principles, and the preparation of interim and annual financial statements (including report combinations, consolidation entries and footnote disclosures) in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. |
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined
in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by
this report.
Based on this evaluation as of September 30, 2007, and due to the material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting as described above, our chief executive officer and
chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified by the SEC. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting
during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably
likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Our audit committee has engaged independent third party consultants to perform periodic reviews
of our financial reporting closing process.
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are not presently involved in any litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any other litigation
threatened against us, except for routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business
which is expected to be covered by our liability insurance.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There were no material changes in our risk factors set forth under Item 1A of Part I of our most
recently filed Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
19
Table of Contents
Agree Realty Corporation
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation and Articles of Amendment of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration Statement No. 33-73858, as amended) | |
3.2
|
Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006) | |
*31.1
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Richard Agree, President and Chief Executive Officer | |
*31.2
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Kenneth R. Howe, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
*32.1
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Richard Agree, President and Chief Executive Officer | |
*32.2
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Kenneth R. Howe, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
* | Filed herewith |
20
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Agree Realty Corporation
/s/ RICHARD AGREE |
||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
||
(Principal Executive Officer) |
/s/ KENNETH R. HOWE |
||
Vice-President and Financial Officer |
||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
||
Date: November 8, 2007 |
21