AGREE REALTY CORP - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
Mark
One
x
|
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
o
|
Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
|
For the
transition period from __________ to __________
Commission
File Number 1-12928
Agree
Realty Corporation
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
|
38-3148187
|
(State
or other jurisdiction
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
of
incorporation or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
31850
Northwestern Highway, Farmington Hills, Michigan
|
48334
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (248) 737-4190
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes x
|
No ¨
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).
Yes ¨
|
No ¨
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
Accelerated Filer
¨ |
Accelerated
Filer
x |
Non-accelerated
Filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting
company ¨ |
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting
company) |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨
|
No x
|
As of May
8, 2009, the Registrant had 7,931,030 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value,
outstanding.
Agree
Realty Corporation
Form
10-Q
Index
|
|
Page
|
|
Part
I:
|
Financial
Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31,
2008
|
1-2
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Income (Unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
|
3
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) for the three months ended
March 31, 2009
|
4
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008
|
5-6
|
||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
7-11
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
12-18
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
18-19
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
19-20
|
|
Part
II:
|
Other
Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
20
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
20
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
20
|
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
20
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
20
|
|
Item
5
|
Other
Information
|
20
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
21
|
|
Signatures
|
22
|
Agree
Realty Corporation
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Real
Estate Investments
|
||||||||
Land
|
$ | 90,574,289 | $ | 87,309,289 | ||||
Buildings
|
215,962,155 | 210,650,491 | ||||||
Property under
development
|
6,665,632 | 13,383,102 | ||||||
313,202,076 | 311,342,882 | |||||||
Less accumulated
depreciation
|
(59,863,702 | ) | (58,502,384 | ) | ||||
Net
Real Estate Investments
|
253,338,374 | 252,840,498 | ||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
262,289 | 668,677 | ||||||
Accounts Receivable - Tenants,
net of allowance of $195,000
|
||||||||
for possible losses at March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008
|
876,461 | 964,802 | ||||||
Unamortized
Deferred Expenses
|
||||||||
Financing costs, net of
accumulated amortization of $4,907,518
and
$4,838,098 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
1,059,524 | 951,745 | ||||||
Leasing
costs, net of accumulated amortization of $791,473
and
$775,450 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
543,758 | 484,781 | ||||||
Other
Assets
|
941,295 | 986,332 | ||||||
$ | 257,021,701 | $ | 256,896,835 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
Agree
Realty Corporation
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Mortgages
Payable
|
$ | 66,795,430 | $ | 67,623,697 | ||||
Notes
Payable
|
34,505,000 | 32,945,000 | ||||||
Dividends
and Distributions Payable
|
4,250,979 | 4,233,232 | ||||||
Deferred
Revenue
|
10,552,467 | 10,724,854 | ||||||
Accrued
Interest Payable
|
246,766 | 500,796 | ||||||
Accounts
Payable
|
||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
617,631 | 850,225 | ||||||
Operating
|
955,357 | 1,261,810 | ||||||
Interest
Rate Swap
|
279,970 | — | ||||||
Deferred
Income Taxes
|
705,000 | 705,000 | ||||||
Tenant
Deposits
|
70,077 | 70,077 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities
|
118,978,677 | 118,914,691 | ||||||
Stockholders’
Equity
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $0.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized,
7,931,030 and 7,863,930 shares
issued and outstanding
|
793 | 786 | ||||||
Additional paid-in
capital
|
144,184,158 | 143,892,158 | ||||||
Deficit
|
(11,212,410 | ) | (11,257,541 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss
|
(260,092 | ) | — | |||||
Total
stockholders’ equity Agree Realty Corporation
|
132,712,449 | 132,635,403 | ||||||
Non-controlling
interest
|
5,330,575 | 5,346,741 | ||||||
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
|
138,043,024 | 137,982,144 | ||||||
$ | 257,021,701 | $ | 256,896,835 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Agree
Realty Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Income (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
|
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
March 31, 2009
|
March 31, 2008
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||
Minimum rents
|
$ | 8,510,626 | $ | 7,978,648 | ||||
Percentage rents
|
6,995 | 4,758 | ||||||
Operating cost
reimbursements
|
719,346 | 782,757 | ||||||
Other income
|
3,761 | 1,592 | ||||||
Total
Revenues
|
9,240,728 | 8,767,755 | ||||||
Operating
Expenses
|
||||||||
Real estate taxes
|
478,941 | 465,313 | ||||||
Property operating
expenses
|
458,510 | 594,378 | ||||||
Land lease
payments
|
214,800 | 168,550 | ||||||
General and
administrative
|
1,251,290 | 1,095,695 | ||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
1,394,498 | 1,295,266 | ||||||
Total
Operating Expenses
|
3,798,039 | 3,619,202 | ||||||
Income
From Operations
|
5,442,689 | 5,148,553 | ||||||
Other
Expense
|
||||||||
Interest expense,
net
|
(1,125,624 | ) | (1,260,076 | ) | ||||
Net
Income
|
4,317,065 | 3,888,477 | ||||||
Less
Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling
Interest
|
(306,419 | ) | (309,525 | ) | ||||
Net
Income Attributable to Agree Realty Corporation
|
$ | 4,010,646 | $ | 3,578,952 | ||||
Earnings
Per Share – Basic
|
$ | 0.52 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
Earnings
Per Share – Dilutive
|
$ | 0.52 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
Dividend
Declared Per Share
|
$ | 0.50 | $ | 0.50 | ||||
Weighted
Average Number of
Common Shares Outstanding – Basic |
7,774,640 | 7,669,992 | ||||||
Weighted
Average Number of
Common Shares Outstanding – Dilutive |
7,781,740 | 7,673,858 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Agree
Realty Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
Additional
|
Accumulated
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Paid-In
|
Non-Controlling
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Interest
|
Deficit
|
Income (loss)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1,
2009
|
7,863,930 | $ | 786 | $ | 143,892,158 | $ | 5,346,741 | $ | (11,257,541 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares under the Equity Incentive
Plan
|
67,100 | 7 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Vesting
of restricted stock
|
— | — | 292,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
and distributions declared
for the period January 1, 2009 to
March 31, 2009
|
— | — | — | (302,707 | ) | (3,965,515 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss
|
— | — | — | (19,878 | ) | — | (260,092 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net
income for the period January
1, 2009 to March 31, 2009
|
— | — | — | 306,419 | 4,010,646 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31,
2009
|
7,931,030 | $ | 793 | $ | 144,184,158 | $ | 5,330,575 | $ | (11,212,410 | ) | $ | (260,092 | ) |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Agree
Realty Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
|
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
March 31, 2009
|
March 31, 2008
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
|
||||||||
Net income attributable to Agree
Realty Corporation
|
$ | 4,010,646 | $ | 3,578,952 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net
income attributable to Agree Realty
Corporation
to net cash provided by operating activities
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
1,378,475 | 1,278,359 | ||||||
Amortization
|
85,443 | 54,907 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
292,000 | 290,000 | ||||||
Net income attributable to
non-controlling interest
|
306,419 | 309,525 | ||||||
Decrease in accounts
receivable
|
88,341 | 126,646 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in other
assets
|
27,880 | (177,674 | ) | |||||
Decrease in accounts
payable
|
(306,453 | ) | (576,228 | ) | ||||
Decrease in deferred
revenue
|
(172,387 | ) | (172,388 | ) | ||||
(Decrease) in accrued
interest
|
(254,030 | ) | (4,592 | ) | ||||
Increase in tenant
deposits
|
- | 10,294 | ||||||
Net
Cash Provided By Operating Activities
|
5,456,334 | 4,717,801 | ||||||
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities
|
||||||||
Acquisition
of real estate investments (including capitalized interest of $76,273 in
2009 and $138,000 in 2008)
|
(1,241,563 | ) | (2,953,920 | ) | ||||
Net
Cash Used In Investing Activities
|
(1,241,563 | ) | (2,953,920 | ) | ||||
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
|
||||||||
Payments
of mortgages payable
|
(828,267 | ) | (670,537 | ) | ||||
Dividends and limited partners’
distributions paid
|
(4,250,468 | ) | (4,233,602 | ) | ||||
Line-of-credit net
borrowings
|
1,560,000 | 3,950,000 | ||||||
Repayments of capital expenditure
payables
|
(850,225 | ) | (1,069,734 | ) | ||||
Payments
of financing costs
|
(177,199 | ) | — | |||||
Payments of leasing
costs
|
(75,000 | ) | (105,901 | ) | ||||
Net
Cash Used In Financing Activities
|
(4,621,159 | ) | (2,129,774 | ) | ||||
Net
Decrease In Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
(406,388 | ) | (365,893 | ) | ||||
Cash and Cash
Equivalents, beginning of period
|
668,677 | 544,639 | ||||||
Cash and Cash
Equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 262,289 | $ | 178,746 |
5
Agree
Realty Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
|
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
March 31, 2009
|
March 31, 2008
|
|||||||
Supplemental
Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
|
||||||||
Cash paid for interest (net of
amounts capitalized)
|
$ | 1,310,234 | $ | 1,226,667 | ||||
Supplemental
Disclosure of Non-Cash Transactions
|
||||||||
Dividends and limited partners’
distributions declared and unpaid
|
$ | 4,250,979 | $ | 4,213,412 | ||||
Real estate investments financed
with accounts payable
|
$ | 617,631 | $ | 1,122,482 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Agree
Realty Corporation
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
Basis of
Presentation
|
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information
and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting
principles for audited financial statements. In the opinion of management,
all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The consolidated
balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements at that date. Operating results for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31,
2009 or for any other interim period. For further information, refer to
the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
|
2.
Stock Based
Compensation
|
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.
123 (R), “Share-Based
Payments” (“SFAS No. 123R”), Agree Realty Corporation (the
“Company”) estimates the fair value of restricted stock and
stock option grants at the date of grant and amortizes those amounts into
expense on a straight line basis or amount vested, if greater, over the
appropriate vesting period.
|
As
of March 31, 2009, there was $3,209,780 of total unrecognized compensation
costs related to the outstanding restricted shares, which is expected to
be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.46 years. The
Company used a 0% discount factor and forfeiture rate for determining the
fair value of restricted stock. The forfeiture rate was based
on historical results and trends and the Company does not consider
discount rates to be material.
The
holder of a restricted share award is generally entitled at all times on
and after the date of issuance of the restricted shares to exercise the
rights of a shareholder of the Company, including the right to vote the
shares and the right to receive dividends on the
shares.
|
Shares
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|||||||
Unvested
restricted shares at January 1, 2009
|
104,050 | $ | 30.57 | |||||
Restricted
shares granted
|
67,100 | 15.14 | ||||||
Restricted
shares vested
|
(21,470 | ) | 29.95 | |||||
Restricted
shares forfeited
|
— | — | ||||||
Unvested
restricted shares at March 31, 2009
|
149,680 | $ | 23.74 |
7
Agree
Realty Corporation
3. Earnings
Per
Share
|
Earnings
per share has been computed by dividing the net income attributable to
Agree Realty Corporation by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. The per share amounts reflected in the consolidated
statements of income are presented in accordance with SFAS No. 128
“Earnings per
Share.”
The
following is a reconciliation of the denominator of the basic net earnings
per common share computation to the denominator of the diluted net
earnings per common share computation for each of the periods
presented:
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
7,924,320 | 7,790,292 | ||||||
Unvested
restricted stock
|
(149,680 | ) | (120,300 | ) | ||||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding used in basic earnings per
share
|
7,774,640 | 7,669,992 | ||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding used in basic earnings per
share
|
7,774,640 | 7,669,992 | ||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||
Restricted
stock
|
7,100 | 3,866 | ||||||
Common
stock options
|
— | — | ||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding used in diluted earnings per
share
|
7,781,740 | 7,673,858 |
4. Derivative
Instruments
and
Hedging
Activity
|
On
January 2, 2009, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement
for a notional amount of $24,501,280, effective on January 2, 2009 and
ending on July 1, 2013. The notional amount decreases over the term to
match the outstanding balance of the hedge borrowing. The Company entered
into this derivative instrument to hedge against the risk of changes in
future cash flows related to changes in interest rates on $24,501,280 of
the total variable-rate borrowings outstanding. Under the terms of the
interest rate swap agreement, the Company will receive from the
counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1.5% plus one-month
LIBOR and will pay to the counterparty a fixed rate of 3.744%. This swap
effectively converted $24,501,280 of variable-rate borrowings to
fixed-rate borrowings beginning on January 2, 2009 and through July 1,
2013.
SFAS No. 133,
“Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS
No. 133”), requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments
as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the balance sheet. In
accordance with SFAS No. 133, we have designated this derivative
instrument as a cash flow hedge. As such, changes in the fair value of the
derivative instrument are recorded as a component of other comprehensive
income (loss) (“OCI”) to the extent of effectiveness. The ineffective
portion of the change in fair value of the derivative instrument is
recognized in interest expense.
|
We
do not use derivative instruments for trading or other speculative
purposes and we did not have any other derivative instruments or hedging
activities as of March 31,
2009.
|
8
Agree
Realty Corporation
5. Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
Certain
of our assets and liabilities are measured at fair value. As defined in
SFAS No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements,” fair value is the price that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. In
determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation methods
including the market, income and cost approaches. The
assumptions used in the application of these valuation methods are
developed from the perspective of market participants, pricing the asset
or liability. Inputs used in the valuation methods can be
either readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable
inputs. Whenever possible the Company attempts to utilize
valuation methods that maximize the uses of observable inputs and
minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. Based on the
operability of the inputs used in the valuation methods the Company is
required to provide the following information according to the fair value
hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and
reliability of the information used to determine fair
values. Assets and liabilities measured, reported and/or
disclosed at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the
following three categories:
Level
1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets of
liabilities.
Level
2 – Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are
corroborated by market date.
Level
3 – Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market
data.
The
table below sets forth our fair value hierarchy for liabilities measured
or disclosed at fair value as of March 31,
2009.
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||
Liability:
|
||||||||||||
Interest
rate swap
|
$ | — | $ | 279,970 | $ | — | ||||||
Fixed
rate debt
|
$ | — | $ | 47,587,238 | $ | — | ||||||
Variable
rate debt
|
$ | — | $ | 56,823,478 | $ | — |
6. Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements”
(“SFAS No. 160”), an amendment to Accounting Research Board
No. 51. SFAS No. 160’s objective is to improve the
relevance, comparability and transparency of financial information that a
reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements. The
key aspects of SFAS No. 160 are (i) the non-controlling interest in
subsidiaries should be presented in the consolidated balance sheet within
equity of the consolidated group, separate from the parent’s shareholders’
equity, (ii) acquisitions or dispositions of noncontrolling interests
in a subsidiary that do not result in a change of control should be
accounted for as equity transactions, (iii) a parent recognizes a
gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, measured
using the fair value of the non-controlling equity investment,
(iv) the acquirer should attribute net income and each component of
other comprehensive income between controlling and noncontrolling
interests based on any contractual arrangements or relative ownership
interests, and (v) a reconciliation of beginning to ending total
equity is required for both controlling and noncontrolling interests. SFAS
No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008 and should be applied prospectively. We adopted
SFAS No. 160 effective beginning on January 1, 2009, and as a result,
non-controlling interest is presented as a separate item in the equity
section of our balance sheet rather than in the mezzanine section of the
balance sheet.
|
9
Agree
Realty Corporation
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS
No. 141”). SFAS No. 141(R) will significantly
change the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS
No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the
acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS
No. 141(R) will change the accounting treatment for certain
specific acquisition related items including: (1) expensing
acquisition related costs as incurred; (2) valuing noncontrolling
interests at fair value at the acquisition date; and (3) expensing
restructuring costs associated with an acquired business. SFAS
No. 141(R) also includes a substantial number of new disclosure
requirements. SFAS No. 141(R) is to be applied
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is
on or after January 1, 2009. We expect SFAS
No. 141(R) will have an impact on our accounting for future
business combinations but it had no current impact on our consolidated
results of operations and financial position.
In
December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-06, “Accounting for the Sale of
Real Estate Subject to the Requirements of FASB Statement No. 66 When the
Agreement Includes a Buy-Sell Clause”
(“EITF 07-06”). EITF 07-06 requires companies to determine
whether the terms of the buy-sell clause indicate that the seller has
transferred the usual risks and rewards of ownership and does not have
substantial continuing involvement pursuant to SFAS 66. It
clarifies that a buy-sell clause, in and of itself, does not
constitute a prohibited form of continuing involvement that would preclude
partial sales treatment under SFAS 66, but should be evaluated in
consideration of all the relevant facts and circumstances. EITF 07-06
was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The
adoption of EITF 07-06 did not have a material impact on our
financial position and results of operations.
In March 2008,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS
No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative
and hedging activities. It clarifies (a) how and why an entity
uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No.133 and its related
interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged
items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. We adopted SFAS No. 161 effective beginning on
January 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement resulted in new
disclosures in the notes to our financial statements.
In
May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles,” (“SFAS No. 162”). The current
hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles is set forth in the
American Institute of Certified Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Auditing
Standards (SAS) No. 69, “The meaning of Present Fairly
in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS No. 162 is intended to improve
financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework or hierarchy for
selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial
statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles for nongovernmental entities. This
Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public
Company Oversight Board Auditing amendments to SAS 69. The
implementation of this Statement did not have a material effect on the
Company’s results of operations or financial position, as the Statement does
not directly impact the accounting principles applied in the preparation
of the Company’s financial statements.
In
June 2008, the FASB ratified FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-01 “Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities” (“FSP EITF 03-6-01”). FSP EITF 03-6-01
addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions
are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be
included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share
(“EPS”) under the two-class method of SFAS 128. It clarifies
that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable right
to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are
participating securities and shall be included in the computation of EPS
pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-01 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The
implementation of FSP EITF 06-6-01 did not have a material impact on our
computation of
EPS.
|
10
7.
Total
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
|
The
following is a reconciliation of net income to comprehensive income
attributable to Agree Realty Corporation for the three months ended March
31, 2009.
|
Net
Income
|
$ | 4,317,065 | ||
Other
Comprehensive Loss
|
(279,970 | ) | ||
Total
Comprehensive Income before non-controlling interest
|
4,037,095 | |||
Less: Non-controlling
interest
|
306,419 | |||
Total
Comprehensive Income after non-controlling interest
|
3,730,676 | |||
Add: Non-controlling
interest of comprehensive loss
|
19,878 | |||
Comprehensive
Income attributable to Agree Realty Corporation
|
$ | 3,750,554 |
11
Agree
Realty Corporation
ITEM
2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
Management
has included herein certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
These forward-looking statements represent our expectations, plans and beliefs
concerning future events and may be identified by terminology such as
“anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend” and similar
expressions. Although the forward-looking statements made in this report are
based on good faith beliefs, reasonable assumptions and our best judgment
reflecting current information, certain factors could cause actual results to
differ materially from such forward–looking statements, including but not
limited to: the
ongoing U.S. recession, the existing global credit and financial crisis and
other changes in general economic, financial and real estate market
conditions; risks that our acquisition and development projects will fail
to perform as expected; financing risks, such as the inability to obtain debt or
equity financing on favorable terms; the level and volatility of interest rates;
loss or bankruptcy of one or more of our major retail tenants; a failure of our
properties to generate additional income to offset increases in operating
expenses; and other factors discussed elsewhere in this report and our other
reports furnished or filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
including our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance
on our forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we
assume no obligation to update these forward–looking statements, even if new
information becomes available in the future.
Overview
Agree
Realty Corporation is a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed
real estate investment trust (“REIT”) focused primarily on the ownership,
development, acquisition and management of retail properties net leased to
national tenants. In this report, the terms “Company,” “we,” “ours”
and “us” and similar terms refer to Agree Realty Corporation and its
subsidiaries as the context may require. We were formed in December
1993 to continue and expand the business founded in 1971 by our current
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Richard Agree. We
specialize in developing retail properties for national tenants who have
executed long-term net leases prior to the commencement of
construction. As of March 31, 2009, approximately 89% of our
annualized base rent was derived from national tenants. All of our
freestanding property tenants and the majority of our community shopping center
tenants have triple-net leases, which require the tenant to be responsible for
property operating expenses, including property taxes, insurance and
maintenance. We believe this strategy provides a generally consistent
source of income and cash for distributions.
As of
March 31, 2009, our portfolio consisted of 70 properties, located in 16 states
containing an aggregate of approximately 3.5 million square feet of gross
leasable area (“GLA”). As of March 31, 2009, our portfolio included
58 freestanding net leased properties and 12 community shopping centers that
were 98.2% leased in aggregate with a weighted average lease term of
approximately 10.6 years remaining. As of March 31, 2009,
approximately 69% of our annualized base rent was derived from our top three
tenants: Borders Group, Inc. – 30%; Walgreen Co.
(“Walgreens”) – 28% and Kmart Corporation – 11%. During the period
April 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011 we have 51 leases that are scheduled to
expire assuming that none of the tenants exercise renewal options or terminate
their leases prior to the contractual expiration date. These leases
represent 522,427 square feet of gross leasable area and $3,408,262 of
annualized base rent.
We expect
to continue to grow our asset base primarily through the development of retail
properties that are pre-leased on a long-term basis to national
tenants. We focus on development because we believe, based on the
historical returns we have been able to achieve, it generally provides us a
higher return on investment than the acquisition of similarly located properties
and does not entail the risks associated with speculative
development. Since our initial public offering in 1994, we have
developed 57 of our 70 properties, including 45 of our 58 freestanding
properties and all 12 of our community shopping centers. As of March
31, 2009, the properties that we developed accounted for 85.7% of our annualized
base rent. We expect to continue to expand our existing tenant
relationships and diversify our tenant base to include other quality national
tenants.
12
Agree
Realty Corporation
Our
assets are held by, and all operations are conducted through, Agree Limited
Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), of which Agree Realty Corporation is
the sole general partner and held a 92.91% and 92.85% interest as of March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. We are operating so as to qualify as a
REIT for federal income tax purposes.
The
following should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements of Agree Realty Corporation, including the respective notes thereto,
which are included in this Form 10-Q.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial
Statements” (“SFAS No. 160”), an amendment to Accounting Research Board
No. 51. SFAS No. 160’s objective is to improve the relevance,
comparability and transparency of financial information that a reporting entity
provides in its consolidated financial statements. The key aspects of SFAS No.
160 are (i) the non-controlling interest in subsidiaries should be
presented in the consolidated balance sheet within equity of the consolidated
group, separate from the parent’s shareholders’ equity, (ii) acquisitions
or dispositions of noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary that do not result
in a change of control should be accounted for as equity transactions,
(iii) a parent recognizes a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is
deconsolidated, measured using the fair value of the non-controlling equity
investment, (iv) the acquirer should attribute net income and each
component of other comprehensive income between controlling and noncontrolling
interests based on any contractual arrangements or relative ownership interests,
and (v) a reconciliation of beginning to ending total equity is required
for both controlling and noncontrolling interests. SFAS No. 160 is effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and should be applied
prospectively. As a result of implementing SFAS 160, non-controlling interest is
presented as a separate item in the equity section of our balance sheet rather
than in the mezzanine section of the balance sheet.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No.
141”). SFAS No. 141(R) will significantly change the
accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS No. 141(R), an
acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with
limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) will change the accounting
treatment for certain specific acquisition related items including:
(1) expensing acquisition related costs as incurred; (2) valuing
noncontrolling interests at fair value at the acquisition date; and
(3) expensing restructuring costs associated with an acquired
business. SFAS No. 141(R) also includes a substantial number of
new disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 141(R) is to be applied
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after January 1, 2009. We expect SFAS No. 141(R) will have
an impact on our accounting for future business combinations but it had no
current impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial
position.
In
December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-06, “Accounting for the Sale of Real
Estate Subject to the Requirements of FASB Statement No. 66 When the Agreement
Includes a Buy-Sell
Clause” (“EITF 07-06”). EITF 07-06 requires companies
to determine whether the terms of the buy-sell clause indicate that the
seller has transferred the usual risks and rewards of ownership and does not
have substantial continuing involvement pursuant to SFAS 66. It
clarifies that a buy-sell clause, in and of itself, does not constitute a
prohibited form of continuing involvement that would preclude partial sales
treatment under SFAS 66, but should be evaluated in consideration of all the
relevant facts and circumstances. EITF 07-06 was effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2007. The adoption of EITF 07-06 did not
have a material impact on our financial position and results of
operations.
13
Agree
Realty Corporation
In March 2008,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS
No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and
hedging activities. It clarifies (a) how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for under SFAS No.133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The
implementation of SFAS No. 161 resulted in new disclosures in the notes to
our financial statements.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles,” (“SFAS No. 162”). The current hierarchy
of generally accepted accounting principles is set forth in the American
Institute of Certified Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Auditing Standards (SAS)
No. 69, “The meaning of
Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS No. 162 is intended to improve financial
reporting by identifying a consistent framework or hierarchy for selecting
accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are
presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for
nongovernmental entities. This Statement is effective 60 days
following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Oversight Board Auditing
amendments to SAS 69. The implementation of this Statement did not
have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial
position, as the Statement does not
directly impact the accounting principles applied in the preparation of the
Company’s financial statements.
In June
2008, the FASB ratified FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-01 “Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (“FSP
EITF 03-6-01”). FSP EITF 03-6-01 addresses whether instruments
granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior
to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in
computing earnings per share (“EPS”) under the two-class method of SFAS
128. It clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards that
contain nonforfeitable right to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid
or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation
of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-01 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The
implementation of FSP EITF 06-6-01 did not have a material impact on our
computation of EPS.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Critical
accounting policies are those that are both significant to the overall
presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require
management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments. For
example, significant estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to
revenue recognition, capitalization of costs related to real estate investments,
potential impairment of real estate investments, operating cost reimbursements,
and taxable income.
Minimum
rental income attributable to leases is recorded when due from
tenants. Certain leases provide for additional percentage rents based
on tenants’ sales volumes. These percentage rents are recognized when
determinable by us. In addition, leases for certain tenants contain
rent escalations and/or free rent during the first several months of the lease
term; however such amounts are not material.
Real
estate assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. All costs
related to planning, development and construction of buildings prior to the date
they become operational, including interest and real estate taxes during the
construction period, are capitalized for financial reporting purposes and
recorded as property under development until construction has been completed.
The viability of all projects under construction or development are regularly
evaluated under applicable accounting requirements, including requirements
relating to abandonment of assets or changes in use. To the extent a project, or
individual components of the project, are no longer considered to have value,
the related capitalized costs are charged against operations. Subsequent to
the completion of construction, expenditures for property maintenance are
charged to operations as incurred, while significant renovations are
capitalized. Depreciation of the buildings is recorded in accordance with the
straight-line method using an estimated useful life of 40 years.
14
Agree
Realty Corporation
We
evaluate real estate for impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable through
estimated undiscounted future cash flows from the use of these
assets. When any such impairment exists, the related assets will be
written down to fair value and such excess carrying value is charged to
income. The expected cash flows of a project are dependent on
estimates and other factors subject to change, including (1) changes in the
national, regional, and/or local economic climates, (2) competition from other
shopping centers, stores, clubs, mailings, and the internet, (3) increases in
operating costs, (4) bankruptcy and/or other changes in the condition of third
parties, including tenants, (5) expected holding period, and (6) availability of
credit. These factors could cause our expected future cash flows from a project
to change, and, as a result, an impairment could be considered to have
occurred.
Substantially
all of our leases contain provisions requiring tenants to pay as additional rent
a proportionate share of operating expenses (“operating cost reimbursements”)
such as real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, insurance, etc. The related
revenue from tenant billings is recognized in the same period the expense is
recorded.
We have
elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”), commencing with our 1994 tax year. As a result, we are not
subject to federal income taxes to the extent that we distribute annually at
least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders and satisfy certain
other requirements defined in the Code.
In
October 2007, we established a taxable REIT subsidiary pursuant to the
provisions of the REIT Modernization Act. Our TRS is able to engage
in activities resulting in income that previously would have been disqualified
from being eligible REIT income under the federal income tax
regulations. As a result, certain activities of the Company which
occur within its TRS entity are subject to federal and state income
taxes. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had
accrued a deferred income tax amount of $705,000 which was netted against the
gain on sale .
Comparison
of Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 to Three Months Ended March 31,
2008
Minimum
rental income increased $532,000, or 7%, to $8,511,000 in 2009, compared to
$7,979,000 in 2008. The increase was the result of the development of a
Walgreens drug store and a bank land lease in Macomb Township, Michigan in March
2008, the development of a Walgreens drug store in Ypsilanti, Michigan in May
2008, the development of a Walgreens drug store in Ocala, Florida in June 2008,
the development of a Walgreens drug store in Shelby Township, Michigan in July
2008, the development of a Walgreens drug store in Silver Springs Shores,
Florida in January 2009 and the development of a Walgreens drug store in
Brighton, Michigan in February 2009. Our revenue increase from these
developments amounted to $484,000. In addition, rental income from
our Big Rapids, Michigan shopping center increased by $74,000 as a result of
redevelopment activities.
Percentage
rents increased $2,000 to $7,000 in 2009.
Operating
cost reimbursements decreased $64,000, or 8%, to $719,000 in 2009,
compared to $783,000 in 2008. Operating cost reimbursements decreased due to the
decrease in property operating expenses as explained below.
Other
income remained constant from 2009 to 2008.
Real
estate taxes increased $14,000, or 3%, to $479,000 in 2009, compared to $465,000
in 2008. The change was the result of general assessment
adjustments.
Property
operating expenses (shopping center maintenance, snow removal, insurance and
utilities) decreased $135,000, or 23%, to $459,000 in 2009 compared to $594,000
in 2008. The net decrease was the result of: a decrease in shopping center
maintenance costs of ($23,000); a decrease in snow removal costs of ($105,000);
an increase in utility costs of $5,000; and a decrease in insurance costs of
($12,000) in 2009 versus 2008.
15
Agree
Realty Corporation
Land
lease payments increased $46,000, or 27%, to $215,000 in 2009, compared to
$169,000 for 2008. The increase was the result of the Company leasing
land for our Shelby Township, Michigan property.
General
and administrative expenses increased by $155,000, or 14%, to $1,251,000 in 2009,
compared to $1,096,000 in 2008. The increase was the result of increased dead
deal costs related to property searches in Michigan and
Florida. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total
rental income (minimum and percentage rents) increased from 13.7% for 2008 to
14.7% for 2009.
Depreciation
and amortization increased $99,000, or 8%, to $1,394,000 in 2009, compared to
$1,295,000 in 2008. The increase was the result of the development of
four properties in 2008 and two properties in 2009.
Interest
expense decreased $134,000, or 11%, to $1,126,000 in 2009, compared to
$1,260,000 in 2008. The decrease in interest expense resulted from substantial
reductions in interest rates in 2009 as compared to 2008.
Our
income before income attributable to non-controlling interest increased
$429,000, or 11%, to $4,317,000 in 2009 from $3,888,000 in 2008 as a result of
the foregoing factors.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our
principal demands for liquidity are operations, distributions to our
stockholders, debt repayment, development of new properties, redevelopment of
existing properties and future property acquisitions. We intend to
meet our short-term liquidity requirements, including capital expenditures
related to the leasing and improvement of the properties, through cash flow
provided by operations and the Line of Credit and the Credit
Facility. We believe that adequate cash flow will be available to
fund our operations and pay dividends in accordance with REIT requirements for
at least the next 12 months. We may obtain additional funds for future
development or acquisitions through other borrowings or the issuance of
additional shares of common stock, although current market conditions have
limited the availability of new sources of financing and capital, which will
likely have an impact on our ability to obtain construction financing for
planned new development projects in the near term. We believe that
these financing sources will enable us to generate funds sufficient to meet both
our short-term and long-term capital needs.
We intend
to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness (including construction or acquisition
financing) to market capitalization of 65% or less. Nevertheless, we
may operate with debt levels which are in excess of 65% of market capitalization
for extended periods of time. At March 31, 2009, our ratio of
indebtedness to market capitalization was approximately 75.7%. This
ratio increased from 65.4% as of December 31, 2008 as a result of a decline in
the market value of our common stock.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.50
per share. We paid the dividend on April 14, 2009 to holders of record on
March 31, 2009.
Our cash
flows from operations increased $738,000 to $5,456,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2009, compared to $4,718,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2008. Cash used in investing activities decreased $1,712,000 to
$1,242,000 in 2009, compared to $2,954,000 in 2008. Cash used in
financing activities increased $2,491,000 to $4,621,000 in 2009, compared to
$2,130,000 in 2008.
As of
March 31, 2009, we had total mortgage indebtedness of $66,795,430. Of this
total mortgage indebtedness, $42,294,150 is fixed rate, self-amortizing debt
with a weighted average interest rate of 6.64% and the remaining mortgage debt
of $24,501,280 has a maturity date of July 14, 2013, can be extended at our
option for two additional years and bears interest a 150 basis points over LIBOR
(or 2.06% as of March 31, 2009). In January 2009, the Company entered into an
interest rate swap agreement that will fix the interest rate during the initial
term of the mortgage at 3.744%.
16
Agree
Realty Corporation
In
addition, the Operating Partnership has in place a $55 million credit facility
(the “Credit Facility”) with Bank of America, as the agent, which is guaranteed
by the Company. The Credit Facility was extended in January 2009 and
now matures in November 2011. Advances under the Credit
Facility bear interest within a range of one-month to twelve-month LIBOR plus
100 basis points to 150 basis points or the lender’s prime rate, at our option,
based on certain factors such as the ratio of our indebtedness to the capital
value of our properties. The Credit Facility generally is used to
fund property acquisitions and development activities. As of March
31, 2009, $34,500,000 was outstanding under the Credit Facility bearing a
weighted average interest rate of 1.52%.
We also
have in place a $5 million line of credit (the “Line of Credit”), which matures
in November 2009 and can be extended at our option, subject to specified
conditions, for two additional one-year periods. The Line of Credit
bears interest at the lender’s prime rate less 75 basis points or 150 basis
points in excess of the one-month to twelve-month LIBOR rate, at our
option. The purpose of the Line of Credit is generally to provide
working capital and fund land options and start-up costs associated with new
projects. As of March 31, 2009, $5,000 was outstanding under the Line
of Credit bearing a weighted average interest rate of 2.50%.
The
following table outlines our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2009 for
the periods presented below (in thousands).
Total
|
April 1, 2009 –
March 31, 2010
|
April 1, 2010 –
March 31, 2012
|
April 1, 2012 –
March 31, 2014
|
Thereafter
|
||||||||||||||||
Mortgages
Payable
|
$ | 66,795 | $ | 3,452 | $ | 7,616 | $ | 30,544 | $ | 25,183 | ||||||||||
Notes
Payable
|
34,505 | 5 | 34,500 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Land
Lease Obligation
|
13,951 | 867 | 1,813 | 1,813 | 9,458 | |||||||||||||||
Estimated
Interest Payments on Mortgages and Notes Payable
|
22,255 | 4,153 | 7,407 | 5,301 | 5,394 | |||||||||||||||
Other
Long-Term Liabilities
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 137,506 | $ | 8,477 | $ | 51,336 | $ | 37,658 | $ | 40,035 |
At March
31, 2009, we had two development projects under construction that will add an
additional 28,470 square feet of GLA to our portfolio. The projects
are expected to be completed during the second and third quarters of 2009,
respectively. Additional funding required to complete the projects is
estimated to be $2,171,000, which is not reflected in the table above, and will
be funded through advances under the Credit Facility.
We plan
to begin construction of additional pre-leased developments and may acquire
additional properties, which will initially be financed by the Credit Facility
and Line of Credit. We will periodically refinance short-term
construction and acquisition financing with long-term debt and/or equity to the
extent available.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not
engage in any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or
financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose
entities.
Inflation
Our
leases generally contain provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact of
inflation on net income. These provisions include clauses enabling the us to
pass through to tenants certain operating costs, including real estate taxes,
common area maintenance, utilities and insurance, thereby reducing the our
exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
Certain of our leases contain clauses enabling us to receive percentage rents
based on tenants' gross sales, which generally increase as prices rise, and, in
certain cases, escalation clauses, which generally increase rental rates during
the terms of the leases. In addition, expiring tenant leases permit us to seek
increased rents upon re-lease at market rates if rents are below the then
existing market rates.
17
Agree
Realty Corporation
Funds from
Operations
Funds
from Operations (“FFO”) is defined by the National Association of Real Estate
Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”) to mean net income computed in accordance
with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus real estate
related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated
partnerships and joint ventures. Management uses FFO as a
supplemental measure to conduct and evaluate our business because there are
certain limitations associated with using GAAP net income by itself as the
primary measure of our operating performance. Historical cost
accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes
that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over
time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or
fallen with market conditions, management believes that the presentation of
operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting
is insufficient by itself.
FFO
should not be considered as an alternative to net income as the primary
indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow as a
measure of liquidity. Further, while we adhere to the NAREIT definition of FFO,
our presentation of FFO is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled
measures of other REITs due to the fact that not all REITs use the same
definition.
The
following table provides a reconciliation of FFO and net income for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 4,010,646 | $ | 3,578,952 | ||||
Depreciation
of real estate assets
|
1,361,318 | 1,262,496 | ||||||
Amortization
of leasing costs
|
16,023 | 14,800 | ||||||
Income
attributable to non-controlling interest
|
306,419 | 309,525 | ||||||
Funds
from Operations
|
$ | 5,694,407 | $ | 5,165,773 | ||||
Weighted
Average Shares and Operating Partnership Units Outstanding –
Dilutive
|
8,387,153 | 8,347,405 |
ITEM
3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
We are
exposed to interest rate risk primarily through borrowing
activities. There is inherent roll-over risk for borrowings as they
mature and are renewed at current market rates. The extent of this
risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future
interest rates and our future financing requirements. Our interest
rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below
presents the principal payments (in thousands) and the weighted average interest
rates on outstanding debt, by year of expected maturity, to evaluate the
expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes.
18
Agree
Realty Corporation
Year ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
Thereafter
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed
rate mortgage
|
$ | 2,986 | $ | 3,191 | $ | 3,407 | $ | 3,640 | $ | 3,887 | $ | 25,183 | $ | 42,294 | ||||||||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
6.64 | % | 6.64 | % | 6.64 | % | 6.64 | % | 6.64 | % | 6.64 | % | — | |||||||||||||||
Variable
rate mortgage
|
$ | 466 | $ | 494 | $ | 524 | $ | 556 | $ | 22,461 | — | $ | 24,501 | |||||||||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
3.74 | % | 3.74 | % | 3.74 | % | 3.74 | % | 3.74 | % | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other
variable rate debt
|
$ | 5 | — | $ | 34,500 | — | — | — | $ | 34,505 | ||||||||||||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
2.50 | % | — | 1.52 | % | — | — | — | — |
The fair
value (in thousands) is estimated at $47,587, $22,318 and $34,505 for fixed rate
mortgages, variable rate mortgage and other variable rate debt, respectively, as
of March 31, 2009.
The table
above incorporates those exposures that exist as of March 31, 2009; it does
not consider those exposures or positions, which could arise after that
date. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to
interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the
period and interest rates.
We
entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge interest rates on $24.5
million in variable-rate borrowings outstanding. Under the terms of the interest
rate swap agreement, we will receive from the counterparty interest on the
notional amount based on 1.5% plus one-month LIBOR and will pay to the
counterparty a fixed rate of 3.744%. This swap effectively converted $24.5
million of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings. As of
March 31, 2009, the interest rate swap was valued at $279,970 and included in
other liabilities on the balance sheet. We do not use derivative
instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and we did not have any
other derivative instruments or hedging activities as of March 31,
2009.
As of
March 31, 2009, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on the portion of
our debt bearing interest at variable rates would result in an annual increase
in interest expense of approximately $590,000.
ITEM
4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
At
December 31, 2008, management identified the following material weakness in our
internal controls:
·
|
We
lack segregation of duties in the period-end financial reporting
process. Our chief financial officer and director of finance
are the only employees with any significant knowledge of generally
accepted accounting principles. The chief financial officer and
the director of accounting are the only employees in charge of the general
ledger (including the preparation of routine and non-routine journal
entries and journal entries involving accounting estimates), the
preparation of accounting reconciliations, the selection of accounting
principles, and the preparation of interim and annual financial statements
(including report combinations, consolidation entries and footnote
disclosures) in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
|
We, under
the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including the
chief executive officer and chief financial officer, conducted an evaluation of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act,
as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on
this evaluation as of March 31, 2009, and due to the material weakness in our
internal control over financial reporting as described above, our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified by the SEC.
19
Agree
Realty Corporation
Our audit
committee has engaged independent third party consultants to perform periodic
reviews of our financial reporting closing process to help mitigate the material
weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. There was
no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the most
recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably
likely to materially affect our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II—OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are
not presently involved in any litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any other
litigation threatened against us, except for routine litigation arising in the
ordinary course of business which is expected to be covered by our liability
insurance.
ITEM
1A.
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
There
were no material changes in our risk factors set forth under Item 1A of Part I
of our most recently filed Form 10-K.
ITEM
2.
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
None
ITEM
3.
|
DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
None
ITEM
4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
|
None
ITEM
5.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None
20
Agree
Realty Corporation
ITEM
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation and Articles of Amendment of the Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form
S-11 (Registration Statement No. 33-73858, as amended)
|
|
3.2
|
Articles
Supplementary, establishing the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed
on December 9, 2008)
|
|
3.3
|
Articles
Supplementary, classifying additional shares of Common Stock and Excess
Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K
filed on December 9, 2008)
|
|
3.4
|
Bylaws
of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006)
|
|
*31.1
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Richard Agree,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
Directors
|
|
*31.2
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Kenneth R.
Howe, Vice President, Finance
|
|
*32.1
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Richard Agree,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
Directors
|
|
*32.2
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Kenneth R.
Howe, Vice President,
Finance
|
__________________
* Filed
herewith
21
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Agree
Realty Corporation
|
|
/s/
RICHARD AGREE
|
|
Richard
Agree
|
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
/s/
KENNETH R. HOWE
|
|
Kenneth
R. Howe
|
|
Vice
President, Finance and
|
|
Secretary
|
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
Date:
May 8, 2009
|
22