ALEXANDERS INC - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

Or

ALEXANDER’S, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(212) 587-8541

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x Yes  o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section  232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  o Yes  o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes  x No

As of June 30, 2009, there were 5,105,936 shares of common stock, par value $1 per share, outstanding.

ALEXANDER’S, INC.

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Alexander’s, Inc. (NYSE: ALX) is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), incorporated in Delaware, engaged in leasing, managing, developing and redeveloping its properties. All references to “we,” “us,” “our,” or “Company” refer to Alexander’s, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. We are managed by, and our properties are leased and developed by, Vornado Realty Trust (“Vornado”) (NYSE: VNO).

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited. In our opinion, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been made. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation S-X and the instructions to Form 10-Q. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our consolidated subsidiaries. All significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain prior year balances have been reclassified in order to conform to current year presentation as a result of the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS 160”).

We currently operate in one business segment.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141R, Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R broadens the guidance of SFAS 141, extending its applicability to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. It also broadens the fair value measurement and recognition of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and interests transferred as a result of business combinations; and acquisition related costs will generally be expensed rather than included as part of the basis of the acquisition. SFAS 141R expands required disclosures to improve the ability to evaluate the nature and financial effects of business combinations. SFAS 141R became effective for all transactions entered into, on or after January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 141R on January 1, 2009, did not have any effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160. SFAS 160 requires a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary to be reported as equity and the amount of consolidated net income specifically attributable to the noncontrolling interest to be identified in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 also calls for consistency in the manner of reporting changes in the parent’s ownership interest and requires fair value measurement of any noncontrolling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. SFAS 160 became effective on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009, resulted in (i) the reclassification of our minority interest in consolidated subsidiary to “noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiary,” a component of permanent equity on our consolidated balance sheets, and (ii) the reclassification of minority interest expense to “net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest” on our consolidated statements of operations.

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

On May 28, 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS 165”).  Although SFAS 165 does not significantly change current practice surrounding the disclosure of subsequent events, it provides guidance on management’s assessment of subsequent events and the requirement to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated.  SFAS 165 became effective on June 30, 2009.  We have evaluated subsequent events through August 2, 2009 for this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

On June 12, 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS 167”).  SFAS 167 modifies the existing quantitative guidance used in determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) by requiring entities to qualitatively assess whether an enterprise is a primary beneficiary, based on whether the entity has (i) power over the significant activities of the VIE, and (ii) an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE.  SFAS 167 becomes effective for all new and existing VIEs on January 1, 2010.  The adoption of SFAS 167 will not have a material affect on our consolidated financial statements. 

On June 29, 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the primary source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS 168 and the Codification become effective on September 30, 2009. When effective, the Codification will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards and the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve only to: (a) update the Codification; (b) provide background information about the guidance; and (c) provide the basis for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. The adoption of SFAS 168 and the Codification on September 30, 2009 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

At June 30, 2009, Vornado owned 32.4% of our outstanding common stock. We are managed by, and our properties are leased and developed by, Vornado, pursuant to the agreements described below, which expire in March of each year and are automatically renewable.

Management and Development Agreements

We pay Vornado an annual management fee equal to the sum of (i) $3,000,000, (ii) 3% of gross income from the Kings Plaza Regional Shopping Center, (iii) $0.50 per square foot of the tenant-occupied office and retail space at 731 Lexington Avenue and (iv) $241,000, escalating at 3% per annum, for managing the common area of 731 Lexington Avenue.

In addition, Vornado is entitled to a development fee of 6% of development costs, as defined, with minimum guaranteed fees of $750,000 per annum. The development fee for the Rego Park II project (see Note 5) is estimated to be approximately $17,500,000, of which $2,996,000 has been paid as of June 30, 2009. The balance is due on substantial completion of the construction.

Leasing Agreements

Vornado also provides us with leasing services for a fee of 3% of rent for the first ten years of a lease term, 2% of rent for the eleventh through the twentieth year of a lease term, and 1% of rent for the twenty-first through thirtieth year of a lease term, subject to the payment of rents by tenants. In the event third-party real estate brokers are used, the fees to Vornado increase by 1% and Vornado is responsible for the fees to the third-party real estate brokers. Vornado is also entitled to a commission upon the sale of any of our assets equal to 3% of gross proceeds, as defined, for asset sales less than $50,000,000 and 1% of gross proceeds, as defined, for asset sales of $50,000,000 or more. The total of these amounts is payable in annual installments in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000, with interest on the unpaid balance at one-year LIBOR plus 1.0% (3.02% at June 30, 2009).

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(UNAUDITED)

Other Agreements

We have also entered into agreements with Building Maintenance Services, a wholly owned subsidiary of Vornado, to supervise cleaning, engineering and security services at our Lexington Avenue and Kings Plaza properties for an annual fee of the cost for such services plus 6%.

The following is a summary of fees to Vornado that were incurred under the agreements discussed above.

At June 30, 2009, we owed Vornado $42,867,000 for leasing fees, $13,266,000 for the earned portion of the Rego II development fee discussed above, and $1,383,000 for management, property management and cleaning fees.

We own approximately 6.6 acres of land adjacent to our Rego Park I property in Queens, New York, which comprises the entire square block bounded by the Horace Harding Service Road (of the Long Island Expressway), 97^th Street, 62^nd Drive and Junction Boulevard. The development at Rego Park II consists of a 600,000 square foot shopping center on four levels and a parking deck containing approximately 1,400 spaces. Construction is expected to be substantially completed by the end of this year and estimated to cost approximately $410,000,000, of which $332,532,000 has been expended as of June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, we have leased 138,000 square feet to Home Depot, 134,000 square feet to Century 21 department store, and 132,000 square feet to Kohl’s, (collectively, the “anchor tenants”). During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we tendered possession to our anchor tenants and and placed that portion of the asset into service; accordingly we transferred approximately $222,000,000 from “Construction in progress” to “Buildings, leaseholds and leasehold improvements.” There can be no assurance that the balance of the project will be completed, completed on time, or completed for the budgeted amount.

On March 25, 2009, Citibank N.A. completed the assignment of its lease aggregating 176,000 square feet to Bloomberg L.P., which now occupies all of the office space at this property.

In February 2009, we sub-leased the Flushing property to a developer for the remainder of our ground lease term.

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(UNAUDITED)

The following is a summary of our outstanding debt.

_____________________________

The fair value of our consolidated debt is calculated by discounting the future contractual cash flows of our existing debt using the current rates available to borrowers with similar credit ratings for the remaining terms of such debt. As of June 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008, the estimated fair value of our consolidated debt was less then its carrying amount by approximately $175,813,000 and $118,485,000, respectively. Such fair value estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized upon disposition of our financial instruments.

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had $49,176,000 and $47,868,000, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized, would result in non-cash income and reduce our effective tax rate. These amounts, which include $11,195,000 and $9,888,000 of accrued interest as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, are included as a component of “liability for income taxes and other” on our consolidated balance sheets.

We recognize interest related to the unrecognized tax benefits in “interest and debt expense” in our consolidated statements of operations. In the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we recognized $659,000 and $643,000, respectively, and in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we recognized $1,308,000 and $1,277,000, respectively, of interest related to the unrecognized tax benefits.

As of June 30, 2009, Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”) tax returns for the years 2003 through 2008 and REIT tax returns for the years 2006 through 2008 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject.

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(UNAUDITED)

Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) are granted at 100% of the market price of our common stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense for each SAR is measured by the excess of stock price at the current balance sheet date over the stock price at the previous balance sheet date. If the stock price is lower at the current balance sheet date, previously recognized expense is reversed but not below zero. On March 2, 2009, Steven Roth, the Chairman of our Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and Michael Fascitelli, our President, each exercised 150,000 SARs, which were scheduled to expire on March 4, 2009. Mr. Roth and Mr. Fascitelli each received gross proceeds of $11,419,000. As a result of the March 2, 2009 exercises, we reversed $34,275,000 of previously recognized SARs compensation expense in the six months ended June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, there are no SARs outstanding. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we reversed $21,950,000 and $21,325,000, respectively, of previously recognized expense, based on our closing stock price of $310.60 at June 30, 2008, compared to $354.50 at March 31, 2008 and $353.25 at December 31, 2007.

Insurance

We carry commercial liability with limits of $200,000,000 per location and all risk property insurance for (i) fire, (ii) flood, (iii) rental loss, (iv) extended coverage, and (v) “acts of terrorism,” as defined in the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (“TRIPRA”) of 2007, with respect to our assets, with limits of $1.7 billion per occurrence for all of our properties. To the extent that we incur losses in excess of our insurance coverage, these losses would be borne by us and could be material.

Our debt instruments, consisting of mortgage loans secured by our properties (which are generally non-recourse to us), contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for the purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. Further, if lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain, it could adversely affect our ability to finance and/or refinance our properties.

Environmental Remediation

In July 2006, we discovered an oil spill at our Kings Plaza Regional Shopping Center. We have notified the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“NYSDEC”) about the spill and have developed a remediation plan. The NYSDEC has approved a portion of the remediation plan and clean up is ongoing. The estimated costs associated with the clean up will aggregate approximately $2,500,000. We have paid $500,000 of such amount and the remainder is covered under our insurance policy.

Flushing Property

In the fourth quarter of 2003, we recognized $1,289,000 of income representing a non-refundable deposit of $1,875,000, net of $586,000 of costs associated with the transaction, from a party that had agreed to purchase this property, as such party had not met its obligations under a May 30, 2002 purchase contract. On September 10, 2002, November 7, 2002, and July 8, 2004, we received letters from the party demanding return of the deposit. On December 28, 2005, the party filed a complaint against us in the Supreme Court of the State of New York alleging that we failed to honor the terms and conditions of the agreement. The complaint seeks specific performance and, if specific performance is denied, it seeks the return of the deposit plus interest and $50,000 in costs. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, we do not believe the party is entitled to either specific performance or a return of the deposit and we are defending against the action. Accordingly, we have not recorded a loss contingency for this matter.

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(UNAUDITED)

Paramus

In 2001 we leased 30.3 acres of land located in Paramus, New Jersey to IKEA Property, Inc. The lease has a 40-year term with a purchase option in 2021 for $75,000,000. We have a $68,000,000 interest only, non-recourse mortgage loan on the property from a third party lender. The fixed interest rate on the loan is 5.92% with interest payable monthly until maturity in October 2011. The annual triple-net rent is the sum of $700,000 plus the amount of debt service on the mortgage loan. If the purchase option is exercised, we will receive net cash proceeds of approximately $7,000,000 and recognize a gain on sale of land of approximately $62,000,000. If the purchase option is not exercised, the triple-net rent for the last 20 years must include the debt service sufficient to fully amortize $68,000,000 over the remaining 20-year lease term.

Letters of Credit

At June 30, 2009, we had approximately $7,998,000 of standby letters of credit that were issued and outstanding.

Other

There are various legal proceedings pending against us that arise in the ordinary course of our business. In our opinion, the outcome of such matters, in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income per share, including a reconciliation of net income and the number of shares used in computing basic and diluted earning per share. Basic earnings per share is determined using the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is determined using the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during the period and assumes all potentially dilutive securities were converted into common shares at the earliest date possible.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Alexander’s, Inc.

Paramus, New Jersey

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Alexander’s, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and statements of changes in equity and cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2009 the Company changed its method of accounting for minority interest to conform to the FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements (“SFAS 160”), and, retrospectively, adjusted the 2008 consolidated financial statements for the changes.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Alexander’s, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended prior to retrospective adjustments for the adoption of SFAS 160, (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 23, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey

August 2, 2009

Certain statements contained herein constitute forward-looking statements as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our future results, financial condition, results of operations and business may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “approximates,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “would,” “may” or other similar expressions in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We also note the following forward-looking statements: in the case of our development project, the estimated completion date, estimated project costs and costs to complete. These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Many of the factors that will determine these items are beyond our ability to control or predict. For a further discussion of factors that could materially affect the outcome of our forward-looking statements, see “Item 1A - Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or the date of any document incorporated by reference. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly, any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes a discussion of our consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Overview

Alexander’s, Inc. (NYSE: ALX) is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), incorporated in Delaware, engaged in leasing, managing, developing and redeveloping its properties. All references to “we,” “us,” “our,” or “Company” refer to Alexander’s, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. We are managed by, and our properties are leased and developed by, Vornado Realty Trust (“Vornado”). We have seven properties in the greater New York City metropolitan area including the 731 Lexington Avenue property, a 1.3 million square foot multi-use building in Manhattan, and the Kings Plaza Regional Shopping Center located in Brooklyn.

We compete with a large number of real estate property owners and developers, some of which may be willing to accept lower returns on their investments. Principal factors of competition are rents charged, attractiveness of the location, the quality of the property and breadth and quality of the services provided. Our success depends upon, among other factors, trends of national and local economies, the financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants and customers, availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, taxes, governmental regulations, legislation and population trends.

In the second half of 2007 the residential mortgage and capital markets began showing signs of stress, primarily in the form of escalating default rates on sub-prime mortgages, declining home values and increasing inventory nationwide. In 2008, the “credit crisis” spread to the broader commercial credit and financial markets resulting in illiquidity and volatility in the bond and equity markets. These trends have continued in 2009. We are currently in an economic recession which has negatively affected substantially all businesses, including ours. Real estate transactions have diminished significantly and capitalization rates have risen. Our real estate portfolio may continue to be affected by declining demand for office and retail space due to bankruptcies, layoffs, downsizing, cost cutting as well as general economic conditions, which would result in lower occupancy rates and effective rents and a corresponding decrease in net income, funds from operations and cash flow. During the first half of 2009, our allowance for doubtful accounts increased, primarily related to Circuit City, which filed for bankruptcy in 2008 and rejected its lease at Rego Park I in March 2009. It is not possible for us to quantify the impact of the above trends, which may persist for the remainder of 2009 and beyond, on our future financial results.

Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”)

On March 2, 2009, Steven Roth, the Chairman of our Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and Michael Fascitelli, our President, each exercised 150,000 SARs, which were scheduled to expire on March 4, 2009. Mr. Roth and Mr. Fascitelli each received gross proceeds of $11,419,000. As a result of the March 2, 2009 exercises, we reversed $34,275,000 of previously recognized SARs compensation expense. As of June 30, 2009, there are no SARs outstanding. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we reversed $21,950,000 and $21,325,000, respectively, of previously recognized expense, based on our closing stock price of $310.60 at June 30, 2008, compared to $354.50 at March 31, 2008 and $353.25 at December 31, 2007.

Flushing

In February 2009, we sub-leased the Flushing property to a developer for the remainder of our ground lease term.

Rego Park I

On March 10, 2009, we repaid the $78,246,000 outstanding balance of the Rego Park I mortgage loan which was scheduled to mature in June 2009, and simultaneously completed a refinancing in the same amount. The new loan bears interest at 75 basis points, is secured by the property and is 100% cash collateralized. The proceeds of the new loan were placed in a non-interest bearing restricted mortgage escrow account. The loan is pre-payable at any time without penalty.

731 Lexington Avenue

On March 25, 2009, Citibank N.A. completed the assignment of its lease aggregating 176,000 square feet to Bloomberg L.P., which now occupies all of the office space at this property.

Rego Park II

The development at Rego Park II consists of a 600,000 square foot shopping center on four levels and a parking deck containing approximately 1,400 spaces. As of June 30, 2009, we have leased 138,000 square feet to Home Depot, 134,000 square feet to Century 21 department store, and 132,000 square feet to Kohl’s, (collectively, the “anchor tenants”). During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we tendered possession to our anchor tenants and placed that portion of the asset into service; accordingly, we transferred approximately $222,000,000 from “Construction in progress” to “Buildings, leaseholds and leasehold improvements.”

Critical Accounting Policies

A summary of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements included therein. There have been no significant changes to those policies during 2009.

Recently Issued Accounting Literature

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 141R, Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R broadens the guidance of SFAS 141, extending its applicability to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. It also broadens the fair value measurement and recognition of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and interests transferred as a result of business combinations; and acquisition related costs will generally be expensed rather than included as part of the basis of the acquisition. SFAS 141R expands required disclosures to improve the ability to evaluate the nature and financial effects of business combinations. SFAS 141R became effective for all transactions entered into, on or after January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 141R on January 1 2009, did not have any effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 requires a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary to be reported as equity and the amount of consolidated net income specifically attributable to the noncontrolling interest to be identified in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 also calls for consistency in the manner of reporting changes in the parent’s ownership interest and requires fair value measurement of any noncontrolling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. SFAS 160 became effective on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009, resulted in (i) the reclassification of our minority interest in consolidated subsidiary to noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiary, a component of permanent equity on our consolidated balance sheet and (ii) the reclassification of minority interest expense to net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest on our consolidated statements of operations.

On May 28, 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS 165”).  Although SFAS 165 does not significantly change current practice surrounding the disclosure of subsequent events, it provides guidance on management’s assessment of subsequent events and the requirement to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated.  SFAS 165 became effective on June 30, 2009.  We have evaluated subsequent events through August 2, 2009 for this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

On June 12, 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS 167”).  SFAS 167 modifies the existing quantitative guidance used in determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) by requiring entities to qualitatively assess whether an enterprise is a primary beneficiary, based on whether the entity has (i) power over the significant activities of the VIE, and (ii) an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE.  SFAS 167 becomes effective for all new and existing VIEs on January 1, 2010.  The adoption of SFAS 167 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. 

On June 29, 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the primary source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS 168 and the Codification become effective on September 30, 2009. When effective, the Codification will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards and the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve only to: (a) update the Codification; (b) provide background information about the guidance; and (c) provide the basis for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. The adoption of SFAS 168 and the Codification on September 30, 2009 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Significant Tenants

Bloomberg L.P. accounted for approximately 34% and 31% of our consolidated revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 34% and 32% of our consolidated revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No other tenant accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

Net income attributable to common stockholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was $13,005,000, compared to $38,454,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Net income attributable to common stockholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 includes $21,950,000 for the reversal of a portion of previously recognized SARs compensation expense.

Property Rentals

Property rentals were $37,878,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared to $35,413,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $2,465,000. This increase was primarily attributable to tendering possession to our anchor tenants at the Rego Park II property, whose space was placed into service during the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

Expense Reimbursements

Tenant expense reimbursements were $16,997,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared to $16,065,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $932,000. This increase was primarily due to reimbursements for higher real estate taxes.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses were $18,252,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared to $17,371,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $881,000. This increase was primarily due to higher real estate taxes.

General and Administrative Expenses

Excluding $21,950,000 for the reversal of previously recognized SARs compensation expense in the quarter ended June 30, 2008, general and administrative expenses decreased by $245,000 from the prior year’s quarter.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization was $6,841,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared to $5,608,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $1,233,000. This increase was primarily due to depreciation on the portion of the asset placed into service at Rego Park II.

Interest and Other Income, net

Interest and other income, net was $668,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared to $5,607,000 in the prior year’s quarter, a decrease of $4,939,000. This decrease was primarily comprised of (i) $1,784,000 from lower average yields on investments, from 2.25% in the quarter ended June 30, 2008, to 0.61% in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, (ii) $1,872,000 for the net gain on the sale of real estate tax abatement certificates in 2008, and (iii) $988,000 from lower average cash balances of $175,730,000 at an average yield of 2.25%.

Interest and Debt Expense

Interest and debt expense was $15,950,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared to $15,562,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $388,000. This increase was due to $2,136,000 of lower capitalized interest as a result of placing a portion of the Rego Park II property in service during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, partially offset by $1,716,000 of interest savings, primarily from the refinancing of the Rego Park I mortgage loan on March 10, 2009.

Income Tax Expense of the Taxable REIT Subsidiary

Income tax expense was $30,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, compared to $622,000 in the prior year’s quarter, a decrease of $592,000. The decrease was due to the liquidation of 731 Residential LLC, our taxable REIT subsidiary, in September 2008.

Net (Income) Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interest

Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest represents our venture partner’s 75% pro rata share of income or loss in our consolidated partially owned entity, the Kings Plaza energy plant joint venture.

Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

Net income attributable to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $59,059,000, compared to $53,606,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Net income attributable to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2009 includes $34,275,000 for the reversal of a portion of previously recognized SARs compensation expense, compared to $21,325,000 for such reversal in the six months ended June 30, 2008.

Property Rentals

Property rentals were $74,075,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $71,446,000 in the prior year’s six months, an increase of $2,629,000. This increase was primarily attributable to tendering possession to our anchor tenants at the Rego Park II property, whose space was placed into service during the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

Expense Reimbursements

Tenant expense reimbursements were $33,890,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $31,798,000 in the prior year’s six months, an increase of $2,092,000. This increase was primarily due to reimbursements for higher real estate taxes.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses were $37,287,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $35,038,000 in the prior year’s six months, an increase of $2,249,000. This increase was primarily due to higher real estate taxes.

General and Administrative Expenses

Excluding (i) $34,275,000 and $21,325,000 for the reversal of a portion of previously recognized SARs compensation expense in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and (ii) $1,407,000 for the write-off of previously capitalized costs at our Flushing property, in the six months ended June 30, 2009, general and administrative expenses decreased by $282,000 from the prior year’s six months.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization was $12,558,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $11,209,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $1,349,000. This increase was primarily due to depreciation on the portion of the asset placed into service at Rego Park II.

Interest and Other Income, net

Interest and other income, net was $1,632,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $10,023,000 in the prior year’s six months, a decrease of $8,391,000. This decrease was primarily comprised of (i) $5,112,000 from lower average yields on investments, from 2.74% in the six months ended June 30, 2008, to 0.59% in the six months ended June 30, 2009, (ii) $1,872,000 for the net gain on the sale of real estate tax abatement certificates in 2008, and (iii) $1,254,000 from lower average cash balances of $91,530,000 at an average yield of 2.74%.

Interest and Debt Expense

Interest and debt expense was $30,846,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $31,243,000 in the prior year’s six months, a decrease of $397,000. This decrease was primarily comprised of (i) interest savings of $2,354,000, principally from the refinancing of the Rego Park I mortgage loan on March 10, 2009 and (ii) a $324,000 decrease in interest on the leasing commissions due to Vornado, mainly due to a lower rate in the current period, partially offset by (iii) $2,246,000 of lower capitalized interest as a result of placing a portion of the Rego Park II property in service during the current period.

Income Tax Expense of the Taxable REIT Subsidiary

Income tax expense was $118,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $1,124,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008, a decrease of $1,006,000. This decrease was due to the liquidation of 731 Residential LLC, our taxable REIT subsidiary, in September 2008.

Net (Income) Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interest

Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest represents our venture partner’s 75% pro rata share of net income or loss in our consolidated partially owned entity, the Kings Plaza energy plant joint venture.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We anticipate that cash from operations, together with existing cash balances, will be adequate to fund our business operations, recurring capital expenditures, and debt amortization over the next twelve months.

Rego Park II Development Project

We own approximately 6.6 acres of land adjacent to our Rego Park I property in Queens, New York, which comprises the entire square block bounded by the Horace Harding Service Road (of the Long Island Expressway), 97^th Street, 62^nd Drive and Junction Boulevard. The development at Rego Park II consists of a 600,000 square foot shopping center on four levels and a parking deck containing approximately 1,400 spaces. Construction is expected to be substantially completed by the end of this year and estimated to cost approximately $410,000,000, of which $332,532,000 has been expended as of June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, $217,054,000 was drawn on the $350,000,000 construction loan. The loan has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.20% (1.52% at June 30, 2009), and matures in December 2010, with a one-year extension option. As of June 30, 2009, we have leased 138,000 square feet to Home Depot, 134,000 square feet to Century 21 department store, and 132,000 square feet to Kohl’s, (collectively, the “anchor tenants”). During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we tendered possession to our anchor tenants and placed that portion of the asset into service. There can be no assurance that the balance of the project will be completed, completed on time, or completed for the budgeted amount.

Insurance

We carry commercial liability with limits of $200,000,000 per location and all risk property insurance for (i) fire, (ii) flood, (iii) rental loss, (iv) extended coverage, and (v) “acts of terrorism,” as defined in the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (“TRIPRA”) of 2007, with respect to our assets, with limits of $1.7 billion per occurrence for all of our properties. To the extent that we incur losses in excess of our insurance coverage, these losses would be borne by us and could be material.

Our debt instruments, consisting of mortgage loans secured by our properties (which are generally non-recourse to us), contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for the purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. Further, if lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain, it could adversely affect our ability to finance and/or refinance our properties.

Liquidity and Capital Resources - continued

Cash Flows

Rental income from our properties is our principal source of operating cash flow. Our property rental income is dependent on a number of factors including the occupancy level and rental rates of our properties, as well as our tenants’ ability to pay their rents. Our properties provide us with a relatively consistent stream of cash flow that enables us to pay our operating expenses, non-development capital improvements and interest expense. Other sources of liquidity to fund our cash requirements include our existing cash, proceeds from debt financings, including mortgage or construction loans secured by our properties, and proceeds from asset sales.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009

Cash and cash equivalents were $438,669,000 at June 30, 2009, compared to $515,940,000 at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $77,271,000. This decrease resulted from $118,280,000 of net cash used in investing activities, partially offset $28,617,000 of net cash provided by financing activities and $12,392,000 of net cash provided by operating activities.

Net cash provided by operating activities of $12,392,000 was comprised of net income of $59,286,000, partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items of $26,755,000 and the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $20,139,000. The adjustments for non-cash items were comprised of (i) a reversal of the liability for SARs compensation expense of $34,275,000 and (ii) straight-lining of rental income of $8,383,000, partially offset by (iii) depreciation and amortization of $14,019,000 and (iv) other non-cash adjustments of $1,884,000, primarily due to a $1,407,000 write-off of previously capitalized costs at our Flushing property. The net change in operating assets and liabilities of $20,139,000 included a $22,838,000 payment for SARs compensation expense.

Net cash used in investing activities of $118,280,000 was primarily comprised of restricted cash of $80,695,000, primarily related to the fully cash-collateralized mortgage at Rego Park I, and capital expenditures of $37,585,000, primarily related to the development of our Rego Park II project.

Net cash provided by financing activities of $28,617,000 was primarily comprised of borrowings under the construction loan to fund expenditures at our Rego Park II project. Financing activities also include the $78,246,000 refinancing of the Rego Park I mortgage loan.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

Cash and cash equivalents were $590,036,000 at June 30, 2008, compared to $560,231,000 at December 31, 2007, an increase of $29,805,000. This increase resulted from $39,485,000 of net cash provided by operating activities and $49,460,000 of net cash provided by financing activities, partially offset by $59,140,000 of net cash used in investing activities.

Net cash provided by operating activities of $39,485,000 was comprised of (i) net income of $53,326,000 and (ii) the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $2,409,000, partially offset by (iii) adjustments for non-cash items of $16,250,000. The adjustments for non-cash items were primarily comprised of (a) a $21,325,000 reversal of previously recognized stock appreciation rights compensation expense, (b) $5,586,000 for the straight-lining of rental income and (c) a net gain on the sale of real estate tax abatement certificates of $1,872,000, partially offset by (d) depreciation and amortization of $12,533,000.

Net cash used in investing activities of $59,140,000 was primarily comprised of capital expenditures of $61,654,000 primarily related to the development of our Rego Park II project, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of real estate tax abatement certificates of $2,986,000.

Net cash provided by financing activities of $49,460,000 was primarily comprised of $55,831,000 of borrowings under the construction loan to fund expenditures at our Rego Park II project and the exercise of share options of $1,617,000, partially offset by repayments of borrowings of $7,313,000.

Funds from Operations (“FFO”)

FFO is computed in accordance with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). NAREIT defines FFO as net income or loss determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), excluding extraordinary items as defined under GAAP and gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets, plus specified non-cash items, such as real estate asset depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

FFO and FFO per diluted share are used by management, investors and industry analysts as supplemental measures of operating performance of equity REITs. FFO and FFO per diluted share should be evaluated along with GAAP net income and income per diluted share (the most directly comparable GAAP measures), as well as cash flow from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities, in evaluating the operating performance of equity REITs. Management believes that FFO and FFO per diluted share are helpful to investors as supplemental performance measures because these measures exclude the effect of depreciation, amortization and gains or losses from sales of real estate, all of which are based on historical costs which implicitly assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, these non-GAAP measures can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and among other equity REITs.

FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs as disclosed in our Statements of Cash Flows. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance or as an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity.

FFO Attributable to Common Stockholders for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

FFO attributable to common stockholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was $19,717,000, or $3.86 per diluted share, compared to $44,264,000, or $8.68 per diluted share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. FFO attributable to common stockholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 includes $21,950,000, or $4.31 per diluted share, for the reversal of previously recognized SARs compensation expense.

FFO attributable to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $71,360,000 or $13.98 per diluted share, compared to $64,617,000, or $12.68 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2008. FFO for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 includes $34,275,000, or $6.71 per diluted share, and $21,325,000, or $4.19 per diluted share, respectively, for the reversal of previously recognized SARs compensation expense.

The following table reconciles our net income to FFO:

We have exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, which are sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control. Our exposure to a change in interest rates is summarized in the table below.

As of June 30, 2009, the fair value of our debt, estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows of our existing debt using the current rates available to borrowers with similar credit ratings for the remaining terms of such debt, was less than the aggregate carrying amount by approximately $175,813,000. Such fair value estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized upon disposition of our financial instruments.

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures: Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We are from time to time involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with our legal counsel, the outcome of such matters, in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

There have been no material changes in our “Risk Factors” as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

None.