Annual Statements Open main menu

ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP. - Annual Report: 2013 (Form 10-K)

Anavex Life Sciences Corp. - Form 10-K - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________________ to________________

Commission file number: 000-51652

ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada 20-8365999
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
51 W 52nd Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10019-6163
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code 1-800-689-3939

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

None N/A
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
(Title of class)

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes [   ]     No [X]

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.
Yes [   ]     No [X]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X]     No [   ]

i


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X]     No [   ]

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [   ]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [   ]   Accelerated filer                 [   ]
     
Non-accelerated filer   [   ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting Smaller reporting company [X]
  company)      

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes [   ]     No [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $16,460,398 based on a price of $0.70 per share, being the closing price of the registrant’s common stock on March 29, 2013.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date 37,237,588 issued and outstanding as of December 24, 2013.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

ii


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I    
     
Item 1. Business. 1
Item 1A. Risk Factors. 9
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments. 19
Item 2. Properties. 19
Item 3. Legal Proceedings. 19
Item 4. Mine safety disclosures. 20
     
PART II    
     
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 21
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 23
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. 23
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. 29
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. 29
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. 30
Item 9A Controls and Procedures 30
Item 9B Other Information 33
     
PART III    
     
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. 34
Item 11. Executive Compensation. 36
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. 40
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 42
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 42
     
PART IV    
     
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 44
Signatures 50

iii


Forward Looking Statements.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including statements regarding our anticipated future clinical and regulatory milestone events, future financial position, business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the anticipated start dates, durations and completion dates of our ongoing and future clinical studies, statements regarding the anticipated designs of our future clinical studies, statements regarding our anticipated future regulatory submissions and statements regarding our anticipated future cash position. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events, including the responses we expect from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and other regulatory authorities and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, preclinical and clinical trials and financial needs. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions including without limitation the risks described in “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These risks are not exhaustive. Other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K include additional factors which could adversely impact our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We cannot assure you that the events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Except as required by applicable laws including the securities laws of the United States and Canada, we assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements.

As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Anavex” mean Anavex Life Sciences Corp., unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

iv


PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

We are a pharmaceutical company engaged in the development of drug candidates. Our lead compounds ANAVEX 2-73 and ANAVEX PLUS, a combination of ANAVEX 2-73 with donepezil (Aricept®) are being developed to treat Alzheimer’s disease and potentially other central nervous system (CNS) diseases.

In pre-clinical studies conducted in France, and in Greece, ANAVEX 2-73 demonstrated anti-amnesic and neuroprotective properties in various animal models including the transgenic mouse model Tg2576. Based on pre-clinical studies, we sponsored a Phase 1 single ascending dose study of ANAVEX 2-73 initiated and completed in 2011. This study was conducted in Germany in collaboration with ABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services (ABX-CRO). The study indicated that ANAVEX 2-73 was well tolerated by study subjects in doses up to 55mg. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we have not yet continued our clinical trials due to a lack of funding.

The Company plans to continue human clinical trials, among them a multiple ascending dose study of ANAVEX 2-73 and ANAVEX PLUS and a Phase 2 thereafter in the first half of fiscal year 2014. Additionally we intend to identify and initiate discussions with potential partners in the next 12 months. Further, we may acquire or develop new intellectual property and assign, license, or otherwise transfer our intellectual property to further our goals.

Our Pipeline

Our pipeline includes one drug candidate and several compounds in different stages of pre-clinical study.

Our proprietary SIGMACEPTOR™ Discovery Platform produced small molecule drug candidates with unique modes of action, based on our understanding of sigma receptors. Sigma receptors may be targets for therapeutics to combat many human diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease. When bound by the appropriate ligands, sigma receptors influence the functioning of multiple biochemical signals that are involved in the pathogenesis (origin or development) of disease.

Compounds that have been subjects of our research include the following:

ANAVEX 2-73

ANAVEX 2-73 may offer a disease-modifying approach in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) by using ligands that activate sigma-1 receptors.

In AD animal models, ANAVEX 2-73 has shown pharmacological, histological and behavioral evidence as a potential neuroprotective, anti-amnesic, anti-convulsive and anti-depressive therapeutic agent, due to its potent affinity to sigma-1 receptors and moderate affinities to M1-4 type muscarinic receptors. In addition, ANAVEX 2-73 has shown a potential dual mechanism which may impact both amyloid and tau pathology. In a transgenic AD animal model Tg2576 ANAVEX 2-73 induces a statistically significant neuroprotective effect against the development of oxidative stress in the mouse brain, as well as significantly increased the expression of functional and synaptic plasticity markers that is apparently amyloid-beta independent. It also statistically alleviated the learning and memory deficits developed over time in the animals, regardless of sex, both in terms of spatial working memory and long-term spatial reference memory.

1


Based on the results of pre-clinical testing, we initiated and completed a Phase 1 single ascending dose (SAD) clinical trial of ANAVEX 2-73 in 2011. In this Phase 1 SAD trial, the maximum tolerated single dose was defined per protocol as 55-60 mg. This dose is above the equivalent dose shown to have positive effects in mouse models of AD. There were no significant changes in laboratory or electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters. ANAVEX 2-73 was well tolerated below the 55-60 mg dose with only mild adverse events in some subjects. Observed adverse events at doses above the maximum tolerated single dose included headache and dizziness, which were moderate in severity and reversible. These side effects are often seen with drugs that target central nervous system (CNS) conditions, including AD.

The ANAVEX 2-73 Phase 1 SAD trial was conducted as a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Healthy male volunteers between the ages of 18 and 55 received single, ascending oral doses over the course of the trial. Study endpoints included safety and tolerability together with pharmacokinetic parameters. Pharmacokinetics includes the absorption and distribution of a drug, the rate at which a drug enters the blood and the duration of its effect, as well as chemical changes of the substance in the body. This study was conducted in Germany in collaboration with ABX-CRO, a clinical research organization that has conducted several Alzheimer’s disease studies, and the Technical University of Dresden.

ANAVEX PLUS

ANAVEX PLUS, a combination of ANAVEX 2-73 with donepezil (Aricept®) is a potential novel combination drug for Alzheimer’s disease. Aricept® (donepezil) is now generic and had until recently total sales of about $4 billion annually. ANAVEX 2-73 showed in combination with Aricept® (donepezil) results for memory improvement by up to 80% in animal models. A patent application was filed in the US for the combination of donepezil (Aricept®) and ANAVEX 2-73 and, if granted, would extend at least until 2033. ANAVEX PLUS showed an ADAS-Cog response of 7 points at 12 weeks and 5.5 points at 26 weeks. These data represent more than twice the ADAS-Cog response exhibited by Aricept® (donepezil) alone.

The animal data was consistent with a humanized calibrated cortical network computer model indicating synergy for ANAVEX 2-73 with Aricept® (donepezil) .

ANAVEX 19-144

ANAVEX 19-144 is the sole active metabolite of ANAVEX 2-73. Like ANAVEX 2-73, pre-clinical data reveals that ANAVEX 19-144 exhibits significant anti-amnesic, neuroprotective and anticonvulsant properties in a variety of in vitro systems and specialized animal models.

In animal models, ANAVEX 19-144 controls seizures and the epileptogenesis process. Moreover, its neuroprotective properties may prevent the process that causes long-term damage to tissue and cells as well as biochemical and physiological alterations to the brain from epileptic seizures.

ANAVEX 1-41

ANAVEX 1-41 is a sigma-1 agonist. Pre-clinical tests revealed significant neuroprotective benefits (i.e., protects nerve cells from degeneration or death) through the modulation of endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondrial and oxidative stress, which damages and destroys cells and is believed by some scientists to be a primary cause of AD. In addition, in animal models, ANAVEX 1-41 prevented the expression of caspase-3, an enzyme that plays a key role in apoptosis (programmed cell death) and loss of cells in the hippocampus, the part of the brain that regulates learning, emotion and memory. These activities involve both muscarinic and sigma-1 receptor systems through a novel mechanism of action.

2


ANAVEX 7-1037

ANAVEX 7-1037 is designed for the treatment of prostate cancer. It is a low molecular weight, synthetic compound exhibiting high affinity for sigma-1 receptors at nanomolar levels and moderate affinity for sigma-2 receptors and sodium channels at micromolar levels. In advanced pre-clinical studies, this compound revealed antitumor potential with no toxic side effects. It has also been shown to selectively kill human cancer cells without affecting normal/healthy cells and also to significantly suppress tumor growth in immune-deficient mice models.

Scientific publications describe sigma receptor ligands positively, highlighting the possibility that these ligands may stop tumor growth and induce selective cell death in various tumor cell lines. Sigma receptors are highly expressed in different tumor cell types. Binding by appropriate sigma-1 and/or sigma-2 ligands can induce selective apoptosis. In addition, through tumor cell membrane reorganization and interactions with ion channels, our drug candidates may play an important role in inhibiting the processes of metastasis (spreading of cancer cells from the original site to other parts of the body), angiogenesis (the formation of new blood vessels) and tumor cell proliferation.

Our compounds are in the pre-clinical and clinical testing stages of development, and there is no guarantee that the activity demonstrated in pre-clinical models will be shown in human testing.

Our Target Indications

We have developed compounds with potential application to two broad categories and several specific indications. The two categories are diseases of the central nervous system, and cancer. Specific indications include:

  • Alzheimer’s disease – In 2012, 5 million Americans suffered from Alzheimer’s disease. The Alzheimer’s Association® reports that by 2025, 6.7 million Americans will be afflicted by the disease. Medications on the market today treat only the symptoms of AD and do not have the ability to stop its onset or its progression. There is an urgent and unmet need for a disease modifying cure for Alzheimer’s disease.

  • Depression - Depression is a major cause of morbidity worldwide according to the World Health Organization (“WHO”). Pharmaceutical treatment for depression is dominated by blockbuster brands, with the leading nine brands accounting for approximately 75% of total sales. However, the dominance of the leading brands is waning, largely due to the effects of patent expiration and generic competition. Our market research leads us to believe that the worldwide market for pharmaceutical treatment of depression exceeds $11 billion annually.

  • seizures. These seizures are transient signs and/or symptoms of abnormal, excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the brain. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, epilepsy affects 2.2 million Americans. Today, epilepsy is often controlled, but not cured, with medication that is categorized as older traditional anti epileptic drugs and second generation anti epileptic drugs. Because epilepsy afflicts sufferers in different ways, there is a need for drugs used in combination with both traditional anti epileptic drugs and second generations anti epileptic drugs. Our market research leads us to believe the American market for pharmaceutical treatment of epilepsy exceeds $12 billion annually.

3


  • Neuropathic Pain – We define neuralgia, or neuropathic pain, as pain that is not related to activation of pain receptor cells in any part of the body. Neuralgia is more difficult to treat than some other types of pain because it does not respond well to normal pain medications. Special medications have become more specific to neuralgia and typically fall under the category of membrane stabilizing drugs or antidepressants. Our market research leads us to believe the worldwide market for pharmaceutical treatment of neuropathic pain exceeds $5 billion annually. Malignant Melanoma - Predominantly a skin cancer, malignant melanoma can also occur in melanocytes found in the bowel and the eye. Malignant melanoma accounts for 75% of all deaths associated with skin cancer. The treatment includes surgical removal of the tumor, adjuvant treatment, chemo and immunotherapy, or radiation therapy. Our market research leads us to believe the worldwide market for the pharmaceutical treatment of malignant melanoma exceeds $200 million annually.

  • Prostate Cancer – Specific to men, prostate cancer is a form of cancer that develops in the prostate, a gland in the male reproductive system. The cancer cells may metastasize from the prostate to other parts of the body, particularly the bones and lymph nodes. Our market research leads us to believe the worldwide market for the pharmaceutical treatment of prostate cancer exceeds $4 billion annually.

  • Pancreatic Cancer - Pancreatic cancer is a malignant neoplasm of the pancreas. In the United States approximately 45,000 new cases of pancreatic cancer will be diagnosed this year and approximately 38,000 patients will die as a result of their cancer. Our market research leads us to believe that the market for the pharmaceutical treatment of pancreatic cancer will exceed $1.2 billion by 2015.

Competition

The pharmaceutical industry is intensely competitive.

At this time, we view our competition as biomedical development companies that are trying to discover and develop compounds to be used in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, and those companies already doing so. Those companies include Prana Biotechnology Ltd. (NASDAQ:PRAN), Elan Corporation, PLC (NYSE:ELN), Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE), Forest Laboratories Inc. (NYSE:FRX), Novartis AG (NYSE:NVS), GlaxoSmithKline PLC (NYSE:GSK), Merck & Co. Inc. (NYSE:MRK), Eli Lilly & Co. (NYSE: LLY), Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) and Roche Holding AG (VTX:ROG).

Each of our competitors have greater capital resources, larger overall research and development staffs and facilities, and a longer history in drug discovery and development, obtaining regulatory approval, and pharmaceutical product manufacturing and marketing than we do. With these additional resources, our competitors will be able to respond to the rapid and significant technological changes in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries faster than we can. Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to acquire funding for our research and development. To continue to acquire funding for our research and development, we will likely have to show progress toward our goals and we will eventually be expected to develop a compound that may result in a transaction with another pharmaceutical company.

4


Our research and development is highly speculative and we may never discover or develop any compounds that we are capable of selling.

Rapid technological development, as well as new scientific developments, and economic circumstances may result in our compounds becoming obsolete before we can recover any of the expenses incurred to develop them.

Patents, Trademarks and Intellectual Property

We are pursuing three U.S. patent applications. Two of the three patent applications are based on parent Greek patent applications. There are corresponding international patent filings. The most recent of the three applications was independently drafted and filed July 12, 2013. On this most recent patent application, Anavex is awaiting a contractually obligated patent assignment document from one of the two named inventors.

Patents we currently own include:

Patent
Number

Jurisdiction

Filing and
Expiration Dates

Invention Title

1002616

Greece

February 21, 1996
February 22, 2016

Synthesis and method of synthesis of a molecular (AE 37) of anticonvulsant, antidepressant and neuroleptic tropic action.

1004208

Greece

October 15, 2001
October 14, 2021

AMINOTETRAHYDROFURAN DERIVATIVES, MUSCARINIC/SIGMA/SODIUM CHANNEL LIGANDS, WITH SYNERGIC SIGMA/MUSCARINIC (NEUROACTIVATING) AND SIGMA/SODIUM CHANNEL (NEUROPROTECTIVE) COMPONENTS, AS PROTOTYPICAL ACTIVATING - NEUROPROTECTORS AND NEUROREGENERATIVE DRUGS

1004868

Greece

April 22, 2003
April 21, 2023

AMINOTETRAHYDROFURAN DERIVATIVES, MUSCARINIC/SIGMA/SODIUM CHANNEL LIGANDS, ORTHO-AND ALLO-STERICALLY OPERATING, AS PROTOTYPICAL NEUROMEODULATING AND NEUROREGENERATIVE DRUGS.

1005865

Greece

January 17, 2007
January 16, 2027

NEW SIGMA LIGANDS with anti-apoptotic and/or pro-apoptotic action on the cells biochemical mechanisms and neuroprotective, anti-cancer, anti- metastatic, and anti-chronic inflammatory properties.

1006794

Greece

February 26, 2009
February 27, 2029

THE NEW SIGMA(σ)-RECEPTOR LIGANDS WITH ANTI-APOPTOTIC AND/OR PRO- APOPTOTIC PROPERTIES OVER CELLULAR BIOCHEMICAL MECHANISMS, WITH NEUROPROTECTIVE, ANTI-CANCER, ANTI-METASTATIC AND ANTI-(CHRONIC) INFLAMMATORY ACTION.


5



1007686 Greece July 8, 2011
July 9, 2031

SYNTHESIS OF (+)- AND (-)-1-(5,5- DIPHENYLTETRAHYDROFURAN-3-YL)-N,N- DIMETHYLMETHYLAMINE, (+)-AND (-)-1- (2,2-DIPHENYLTETRAHYDROFURAN-3-YL)- N,N-DIMETHYLMETHYLAMINE AND (+)- AND (-)-1-(2,2- DIPHENYLTETRAHYDROFURAN-3-YL)-N- METHYLMETHYLAMINE

1007322 Greece March 9, 2010
March 10, 2030

SYNTHESIS OF 1-METHYL-4-[4,4-DIPHENYL-4- (1-ADAMANTYL)-BUTYL] PIPERAZINE AND ANALOGUES THEREOF WITH ANTI-CANCER PROPERTIES

We regard patents and other proprietary technology rights as corporate assets. Accordingly, we attempt to optimize the value of intellectual property in developing our business strategy including the selective development, protection, and exploitation of our intellectual property rights.

In addition to filings made with intellectual property organizations, we protect our intellectual property and confidential information by means of carefully considered processes of communication and the sharing of information, and by the use of confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements and provisions for the same in contractor’s agreements. While no agreement offers absolute protection, such agreements provide some form of recourse in the event of disclosure, or anticipated disclosure.

Our patent position, like that of many biomedical companies, is uncertain and involves complex legal and technical questions for which important legal principles are unresolved. We may file additional patent applications in the United States, or in other jurisdictions for further inventions. We may not be successful in obtaining critical claims or in protecting our potential drug compounds or processes. Even if we do obtain patents, they may not adequately protect the technology we own or have licensed. In addition, others may challenge, seek to invalidate, infringe or circumvent any patents we own or license, and rights we receive under those patents may not provide competitive advantages to us. Further, the manufacture, use or sale of our potential drug compounds may infringe the patent rights of others.

Our success will also depend in part on our ability to commercialize our compounds without infringing the proprietary rights of others. We have not conducted extensive freedom of use patent searches and no assurance can be given that patents do not exist or could not be filed which would have an adverse effect on our ability to market our technology or maintain our competitive position with respect to our technology. If our compounds or other subject matter are claimed under other existing United States or other patents or are otherwise protected by third party proprietary rights, we may be subject to infringement actions. In such event, we may challenge the validity of such patents or other proprietary rights or we may be required to obtain licenses from such companies in order to develop, manufacture or market our technology. There can be no assurances that we would be able to obtain such licenses or that such licenses, if available, could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. Furthermore, the failure to either develop a commercially viable alternative or obtain such licenses could result in delays in marketing all of our potential drug compounds based on our drug technology or the inability to proceed with the development, manufacture or sale of potential drug compounds requiring such licenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we defend ourselves against charges of patent infringement or to protect our proprietary rights against third parties, substantial costs will be incurred regardless of whether we are successful. Such proceedings are typically protracted with no certainty of success. An adverse outcome could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties and force us to curtail or cease our research and development of our technology.

6


Government Approval

Regulation by governmental authorities in the United States and foreign countries is a significant factor in the development, manufacture, and expected marketing of our potential drug compounds and in potential future research and development activities. The nature and extent to which such regulation will apply to us will vary depending on the nature of any potential drug compounds developed. We anticipate that all of our potential drug compounds will require regulatory approval by governmental agencies prior to commercialization.

In particular, human therapeutic products are subject to rigorous non-clinical and clinical testing and other approval procedures of the FDA and similar regulatory authorities in other countries. Various federal statutes and regulations also govern or influence testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage, and record-keeping related to such products and their marketing. The process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent compliance with the appropriate federal statutes and regulations requires substantial time and financial resources. Any failure by us or our collaborators to obtain, or any delay in obtaining, regulatory approval could adversely affect the marketing of any potential drug compounds developed by us, our ability to receive product revenues, and our liquidity and capital resources.

The steps ordinarily required before a new drug may be marketed in the United States, which are similar to steps required in most other countries, include:

  • non-clinical laboratory tests, non-clinical studies in animals, formulation studies and the submission to the FDA of an investigational new drug application;
  • adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the drug;
  • the submission of a new drug application or biologic license application to the FDA; and
  • FDA review and approval of the new drug application or biologics license application.

Non-clinical tests include laboratory evaluation of potential drug compound chemistry, formulation and toxicity, as well as animal studies. The results of non-clinical testing are submitted to the FDA as part of an investigational new drug application. A 30-day waiting period after the filing of each investigational new drug application is required prior to commencement of clinical testing in humans. At any time during the 30-day period or at any time thereafter, the FDA may halt proposed or ongoing clinical trials until the FDA authorizes trials under specified terms. The investigational new drug application process may be extremely costly and substantially delay the development of our potential drug compounds. Moreover, positive results of non-clinical tests will not necessarily indicate positive results in subsequent clinical trials. The FDA may require additional animal testing after an initial investigational new drug application is approved and prior to Phase III trials.

Clinical trials to support new drug applications are typically conducted in three sequential phases, although the phases may overlap. During Phase I, clinical trials are conducted with a small number of subjects to assess metabolism, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacological actions and safety, including side effects associated with increasing doses. Phase II usually involves studies in a limited patient population to assess the efficacy of the drug in specific, targeted indications; assess dosage tolerance and optimal dosage; and identify possible adverse effects and safety risks.

7


If a compound is found to be potentially effective and to have an acceptable safety profile in Phase I and II evaluations, Phase III trials are undertaken to further demonstrate clinical efficacy and to further test for safety within an expanded patient population at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites.

After successful completion of the required clinical trials, a new drug application is generally submitted. The FDA may request additional information before accepting the new drug application for filing, in which case the new drug application must be resubmitted with the additional information. Once the submission has been accepted for filing, the FDA reviews the new drug application and responds to the applicant. The FDA’s requests for additional information or clarification often significantly extends the review process. The FDA may refer the new drug application to an appropriate advisory committee for review, evaluation, and recommendation as to whether the new drug application should be approved, although the FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee.

Sales outside the United States of potential drug compounds we develop will also be subject to foreign regulatory requirements governing human clinical trials and marketing for drugs. The requirements vary widely from country to country, but typically the registration and approval process takes several years and requires significant resources. In most cases, if the FDA has not approved a potential drug compound for sale in the United States, the potential drug compound may be exported for sale outside of the United States, only if it has been approved in any one of the following: the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Israel, Switzerland and South Africa. There are specific FDA regulations that govern this process.

Research and Development Expenses

Historically, a significant portion of our operating expenses has related to research and development. Recently, we have significantly curtailed our spending on research and development. See Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for costs and expenses related to research and development, and other financial information for fiscal years 2013 and 2012.

Scientific Advisors

We are advised by scientists and physicians with experience relevant to our company and our product candidates. In the past twelve months, our advisors included Alexandre Vamvakides, Ph.D., Tangui Nicolas Maurice, Ph.D., Christopher Missling, Ph.D., Dr. Paul Aisen, Dr. Rachelle Doody, and Dr. Jeffrey Cummings.

Officers

One of our directors is engaged as an officer-employee of the Company serving in the capacity of president, secretary, treasurer, chief executive officer and chief financial officer.

Employees

We currently have one (1) full-time employee, and we retain several independent contractors on an as-needed basis. We believe that we have good relations with our employees.

8


ITEM 1 A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. As a result of the risk factors set forth below, actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently consider to be immaterial, may also impact our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. If any such risks occur, our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition could be materially affected in an adverse manner. Under such circumstances, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to our Company

We have had a history of losses and no revenue, which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Since inception on January 23, 2004 through September 30, 2013, we have accumulated losses of $40,654,168. As of September 30, 2013, we had a working capital deficiency of $1,559,211. We can offer no assurance that we will ever operate profitably or that we will generate positive cash flow in the future. To date, we have not generated any revenues from our operations. Our history of losses and no revenues raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As a result, our management expects the business to continue to experience negative cash flow for the foreseeable future and cannot predict when, if ever, our business might become profitable. We will need to raise additional funds, and such funds may not be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to raise funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to execute our business plan, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements. This may seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are an early development stage pharmaceutical research and development company and may never be able to successfully develop marketable products or generate any revenue. We have a very limited relevant operating history upon which an evaluation of our performance and prospects can be made. There is no assurance that our future operations will result in profits. If we cannot generate sufficient revenues, we may suspend or cease operations.

We are an early development stage company and have not generated any revenues to date and have no operating history. All of our potential drug compounds are in the concept stage or early clinical development stage. Moreover, we cannot be certain that our research and development efforts will be successful or, if successful, that our potential drug compounds will ever be approved for sales to pharmaceutical companies or generate commercial revenues. We have no relevant operating history upon which an evaluation of our performance and prospects can be made. We are subject to all of the business risks associated with a new enterprise, including, but not limited to, risks of unforeseen capital requirements, failure of potential drug compounds either in non-clinical testing or in clinical trials, failure to establish business relationships and competitive disadvantages against larger and more established companies. If we fail to become profitable, we may suspend or cease operations.

We will need additional funding and may be unable to raise additional capital when needed, which would force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development activities.

9


We will need to raise additional funding and the current economic conditions may have a negative impact on our ability to raise additional needed capital on terms that are favorable to our company or at all. We may not be able to generate significant revenues for several years, if at all. Until we can generate significant revenues, if ever, we expect to satisfy our future cash needs through equity or debt financing. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our research and development activities.

We may be unable to continue as a going concern in which case our securities will have little or no value.

Our independent auditors have noted in their report concerning our annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 that we have incurred substantial losses since inception, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. In the event we are not able to continue operations you will likely suffer a complete loss of your investment in our securities.

Risks Related to our Business

Even if we are able to develop our potential drug compounds, we may not be able to receive regulatory approval, or if approved, we may not be able to generate significant revenues or successfully commercialize our products, which will adversely affect our financial results and financial condition and we will have to delay or terminate some or all of our research and development plans and we may be forced to cease operations.

All of our potential drug compounds will require extensive additional research and development, including non-clinical testing and clinical trials, as well as regulatory approvals, before we can market them. We cannot predict if or when any of the potential drug compounds we intend to develop will be approved for marketing. There are many reasons that we may fail in our efforts to develop our potential drug compounds. These include:

  • the possibility that non-clinical testing or clinical trials may show that our potential drug compounds are ineffective and/or cause harmful side effects;

  • our potential drug compounds may prove to be too expensive to manufacture or administer to patients;

  • our potential drug compounds may fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals from the United States Food and Drug Administration or foreign regulatory authorities in a timely manner, or at all;

  • even if our potential drug compounds are approved, we may not be able to produce them in commercial quantities or at reasonable costs;

  • even if our potential drug compounds are approved, they may not achieve commercial acceptance;

  • regulatory or governmental authorities may apply restrictions to any of our potential drug compounds, which could adversely affect their commercial success; and

  • the proprietary rights of other parties may prevent us or our potential collaborative partners from marketing our potential drug compounds.

10


If we fail to develop our potential drug compounds, our financial results and financial condition will be adversely affected, we will have to delay or terminate some or all of our research and development plans and may be forced to cease operations.

Our research and development plans will require substantial additional future funding which could impact our operational and financial condition. Without the required additional funds, we will likely cease operations.

It will take several years before we are able to develop potentially marketable products, if at all. Our research and development plans will require substantial additional capital, arising from costs to:

  • conduct research, non-clinical testing and human studies;

  • establish pilot scale and commercial scale manufacturing processes and facilities; and

  • establish and develop quality control, regulatory, marketing, sales, finance and administrative capabilities to support these programs.

Our future operating and capital needs will depend on many factors, including:

  • the pace of scientific progress in our research and development programs and the magnitude of these programs;

  • the scope and results of pre-clinical testing and human studies;

  • the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals;

  • the time and costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patents;

  • competing technological and market developments;

  • our ability to establish additional collaborations;

  • changes in our existing collaborations;

  • the cost of manufacturing scale-up; and

  • the effectiveness of our commercialization activities.

We base our outlook regarding the need for funds on many uncertain variables. Such uncertainties include the success of our research initiatives, regulatory approvals, the timing of events outside our direct control such as negotiations with potential strategic partners and other factors. Any of these uncertain events can significantly change our cash requirements as they determine such one-time events as the receipt or payment of major milestones and other payments.

Additional funds will be required to support our operations and if we are unable to obtain them on favorable terms, we may be required to cease or reduce further research and development of our drug product programs, sell some or all of our intellectual property, merge with another entity or cease operations.

If we fail to demonstrate efficacy in our non-clinical studies and clinical trials our future business prospects, financial condition and operating results will be materially adversely affected.

11


The success of our research and development efforts will be greatly dependent upon our ability to demonstrate potential drug compound efficacy in non-clinical studies, as well as in clinical trials. Non-clinical studies involve testing potential drug compounds in appropriate non-human disease models to demonstrate efficacy and safety. Regulatory agencies evaluate these data carefully before they will approve clinical testing in humans. If certain non-clinical data reveals potential safety issues or the results are inconsistent with an expectation of the potential drug compound’s efficacy in humans, the regulatory agencies may require additional more rigorous testing, before allowing human clinical trials. This additional testing will increase program expenses and extend timelines. We may decide to suspend further testing on our potential drug compounds if, in the judgment of our management and advisors, the non-clinical test results do not support further development.

Moreover, success in non-clinical testing and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful, and we cannot be sure that the results of later clinical trials will replicate the results of prior clinical trials and non-clinical testing. The clinical trial process may fail to demonstrate that our potential drug compounds are safe for humans and effective for indicated uses. This failure would cause us to abandon a drug candidate and may delay development of other potential drug compounds. Any delay in, or termination of, our non-clinical testing or clinical trials will delay the filing of an investigational new drug application and new drug application with the Food and Drug Administration or the equivalent applications with pharmaceutical regulatory authorities outside the United States and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize our potential drug compounds and generate product revenues. In addition, we expect that our early clinical trials will involve small patient populations. Because of the small sample size, the results of these early clinical trials may not be indicative of future results.

Following successful non-clinical testing, potential drug compounds will need to be tested in a clinical development program to provide data on safety and efficacy prior to becoming eligible for product approval and licensure by regulatory agencies. From the first human trial through to regulatory approval can take many years and 10-12 years is not unusual for certain compounds.

If any of our future clinical development potential drug compounds become the subject of problems, our ability to sustain our development programs will become critically compromised. For example, efficacy or safety concerns may arise, whether or not justified, that could lead to the suspension or termination of our clinical programs. Examples of problems that could arise include, among others:

  • efficacy or safety concerns with the potential drug compounds, even if not justified;

  • manufacturing difficulties or concerns;

  • regulatory proceedings subjecting the potential drug compounds to potential recall;

  • publicity affecting doctor prescription or patient use of the potential drug compounds;

  • pressure from competitive products; or

  • introduction of more effective treatments.

Each clinical phase is designed to test attributes of the drug and problems that might result in the termination of the entire clinical plan can be revealed at any time throughout the overall clinical program. The failure to demonstrate efficacy in our clinical trials would have a material adverse effect on our future business prospects, financial condition and operating results.

If we do not obtain the support of qualified scientific collaborators, our revenue, growth and profitability will likely be limited, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

12


We will need to establish relationships with leading scientists and research institutions. We believe that such relationships are pivotal to establishing products using our technologies as a standard of care for various indications. Additionally, although in discussion, there is no assurance that our current research partners will continue to work with us or that we will be able to attract additional research partners. If we are not able to establish scientific relationships to assist in our research and development, we may not be able to successfully develop our potential drug compounds. If this happens, our business will be adversely affected.

We may not be able to develop market or generate sales of our products to the extent anticipated. Our business may fail and investors could lose all of their investment in our company.

Assuming that we are successful in developing our potential drug compounds and receiving regulatory clearances to market our products, our ability to successfully penetrate the market and generate sales of those products may be limited by a number of factors, including the following:

  • If our competitors receive regulatory approvals for and begin marketing similar products in the United States, the European Union, Japan and other territories before we do, greater awareness of their products as compared to ours will cause our competitive position to suffer;

  • Information from our competitors or the academic community indicating that current products or new products are more effective or offer compelling other benefits than our future products could impede our market penetration or decrease our future market share; and

  • The pricing and reimbursement environment for our future products, as well as pricing and reimbursement decisions by our competitors and by payers, may have an effect on our revenues.

If this happens, our business will be adversely affected.

None of our potential drug compounds may reach the commercial market for a number of reasons and our business may fail.

Successful research and development of pharmaceutical products is high risk. Most products and development candidates fail to reach the market. Our success depends on the discovery of new drug compounds that we can commercialize. It is possible that our products may never reach the market for a number of reasons. They may be found ineffective or may cause harmful side-effects during non-clinical testing or clinical trials or fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals. We may find that certain products cannot be manufactured at a commercial scale and, therefore, they may not be economical to produce. Our potential products could also fail to achieve market acceptance or be precluded from commercialization by proprietary rights of third parties. Our patents, patent applications, trademarks and other intellectual property may be challenged and this may delay or prohibit us from effectively commercializing our products. Furthermore, we do not expect our potential drug compounds to be commercially available for a number of years, if at all. If none of our potential drug compounds reach the commercial market, our business will likely fail and investors will lose all of their investment in our company. If this happens, our business will be adversely affected.

If our competitors succeed in developing products and technologies that are more effective or with a better profile than our own, or if scientific developments change our understanding of the potential scope and utility of our potential products, then our technologies and future products may be rendered undesirable or obsolete.

13


We face significant competition from industry participants that are pursuing technologies in similar disease states to those that we are pursuing and are developing pharmaceutical products that are competitive with our products. Nearly all of our industry competitors have greater capital resources, larger overall research and development staffs and facilities, and a longer history in drug discovery and development, obtaining regulatory approval and pharmaceutical product manufacturing and marketing than we do. With these additional resources, our competitors may be able to respond to the rapid and significant technological changes in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries faster than we can. Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to maintain a competitive position with respect to these technologies. Rapid technological development, as well as new scientific developments, may result in our products becoming obsolete before we can recover any of the expenses incurred to develop them. For example, changes in our understanding of the appropriate population of patients who should be treated with a targeted therapy like we are developing may limit the drug’s market potential if it is subsequently demonstrated that only certain subsets of patients should be treated with the targeted therapy.

Our reliance on third parties, such as university laboratories, contract manufacturing organizations and contract or clinical research organizations, may result in delays in completing, or a failure to complete, non-clinical testing or clinical trials if they fail to perform under our agreements with them.

In the course of product development, we may engage university laboratories, other biotechnology companies or contract or clinical manufacturing organizations to manufacture drug material for us to be used in non-clinical and clinical testing and contract research organizations to conduct and manage non-clinical and clinical studies. If we engage these organizations to help us with our non-clinical and clinical programs, many important aspects of this process have been and will be out of our direct control. If any of these organizations we may engage in the future fail to perform their obligations under our agreements with them or fail to perform non-clinical testing and/or clinical trials in a satisfactory manner, we may face delays in completing our clinical trials, as well as commercialization of any of our potential drug compounds. Furthermore, any loss or delay in obtaining contracts with such entities may also delay the completion of our clinical trials, regulatory filings and the potential market approval of our potential drug compounds.

If we fail to compete successfully with respect to partnering, licensing, mergers, acquisitions, joint venture and other collaboration opportunities, we may be limited in our ability to research and develop our potential drug compounds.

Our competitors compete with us to attract established biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies or organizations for partnering, licensing, mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures or other collaborations. Collaborations include contracting with academic research institutions for the performance of specific scientific testing. If our competitors successfully enter into partnering arrangements or license agreements with academic research institutions, we will then be precluded from pursuing those specific opportunities. Since each of these opportunities is unique, we may not be able to find a substitute. Other companies have already begun many drug development programs, which may target diseases that we are also targeting, and have already entered into partnering and licensing arrangements with academic research institutions, reducing the pool of available opportunities.

Universities and public and private research institutions also compete with us. While these organizations primarily have educational or basic research objectives, they may develop proprietary technology and acquire patent applications and patents that we may need for the development of our potential drug compounds. We will attempt to license this proprietary technology, if available. These licenses may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to compete successfully with respect to acquisitions, joint venture and other collaboration opportunities, we may be limited in our ability to develop new products.

14


The use of any of our products in clinical trials may expose us to liability claims, which may cost us significant amounts of money to defend against or pay out, causing our business to suffer.

The nature of our business exposes us to potential liability risks inherent in the testing, manufacturing and marketing of our products. We currently have one drug compound in clinical trials, however, when any of our products enter into clinical trials or become marketed products they could potentially harm people or allegedly harm people and we may be subject to costly and damaging product liability claims. Some of the patients who participate in clinical trials are already ill when they enter a trial or may intentionally or unintentionally fail to meet the exclusion criteria. The waivers we obtain may not be enforceable and may not protect us from liability or the costs of product liability litigation. Although we intend to obtain product liability insurance that we believe is adequate, we are subject to the risk that our insurance will not be sufficient to cover claims. The insurance costs along with the defense or payment of liabilities above the amount of coverage could cost us significant amounts of money and management distraction from other elements of the business, causing our business to suffer.

The patent positions of biopharmaceutical products are complex and uncertain and we may not be able to protect our patented or other intellectual property. If we cannot protect this property, we may be prevented from using it or our competitors may use it and our business could suffer significant harm. Also, the time and money we spend on acquiring and enforcing patents and other intellectual property will reduce the time and money we have available for our research and development, possibly resulting in a slow down or cessation of our research and development.

We own patents and patent applications (or have contractual obligations of assignment) related to our potential drug compounds. However, neither the patents nor patent applications ensure the protection of our intellectual property for a number of reasons, including the following:

  1.

Competitors may interfere with our patenting process in a variety of ways. Competitors may claim that they invented the claimed invention prior to us. Competitors may also claim that we are infringing their patents and restrict our freedom to operate. Competitors may also contest our patents and patent application, if issued, by showing the patent examiner that the invention was not original, was not novel or was obvious. In litigation, a competitor could claim that our patents and patent application are not valid for a number of reasons. If a court agrees, we would lose that patents or patent application. As a company, we have no meaningful experience with competitors interfering with our patents or patent applications.

  2.

Because of the time, money and effort involved in obtaining and enforcing patents, our management may spend less time and resources on developing potential drug compounds than they otherwise would, which could increase our operating expenses and delay product programs.

  3.

Issuance of a patent may not provide much practical protection. If we receive a patent with a narrow scope, then it may be easier for competitors to design products that do not infringe our patent(s).

  4.

No patents have been issued yet in the United States.

  5.

Our primary patent application for the combination of ANAVEX 2-73 with donepezil is pending only in the United States Patent and Trademark Office The lack of patent protection in global markets may inhibit our ability to advance our compounds and may make Anavex less attractive to potential partners We would scale this paragraph back. We have discussed Greece IP before. Also India, Russia and China. The edit is my take on a far more limited statement.


15


  (a)

Defending a lawsuit takes significant time and can be very expensive.

  (b)

If a court decides that our drug compound, its method of manufacture or use, infringes on the competitor’s patent, we may have to pay substantial damages for past infringement.

  (c)

The court may prohibit us from making, selling or licensing the potential drug compound unless the patent holder grants a license. The patent holder is not required to grant us a license. If a license is available, we may have to pay substantial royalties or grant cross licenses to our patents, and the license terms may be unacceptable.

  (d)

Redesigning our potential drug compounds so that they do not infringe on other patents may not be possible or could require substantial funds and time.

It is also unclear whether our trade secrets are adequately protected. While we use reasonable efforts to protect our trade secrets, our employees or consultants may unintentionally or willfully disclose our information to competitors. Enforcing a claim that someone illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets, like patent litigation, is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the United States are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets. Our competitors may independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how.

We may also support and collaborate in research conducted by government organizations, hospitals, universities or other educational institutions. These research partners may be unable or unwilling to grant us exclusive rights to technology or products derived from these collaborations prior to entering into the relationship.

If we do not obtain required licenses or rights, we could encounter delays in our product development efforts while we attempt to design around other patents or even be prohibited from developing, manufacturing or selling potential drug compounds requiring these rights or licenses. There is also a risk that disputes may arise as to the rights to technology or potential drug compounds developed in collaboration with other parties.

Our substantial debt and other financial obligations could impair our financial condition and our ability to fulfill our debt obligations. Any refinancing of this substantial debt could be at significantly higher interest rates.

As of September 30, 2013, we had total liabilities of $2,856,660 and accumulated deficit of $41,204,972. Our substantial indebtedness and other current financial obligations and any that we may become a party to in the future could:

  • impair our ability to obtain financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, or general corporate purposes;

  • have a material adverse effect on us if we fail to comply with financial and affirmative and restrictive covenants in debt agreements and an event of default occurs as a result of a failure that is not cured or waived;

  • require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow for interest payments on our indebtedness and other financial obligations, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital and capital expenditures;

  • limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; and

16


  • place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have proportionally less debt.

If we are unable to meet our debt service obligations and other financial obligations, we could be forced to restructure or refinance our indebtedness and other financial transactions, seek additional equity capital, sell our assets or curtail our operations. We might then be unable to obtain such financing or capital or sell our assets on satisfactory terms, if at all. Any refinancing of our indebtedness could be at significantly higher interest rates, and/or incur significant transaction fees.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

A decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise further working capital and adversely impact our operations and would severely dilute existing or future investors if we were to raise funds at lower prices.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in our ability to raise capital. Because our operations have been financed through the sale of equity securities, a decline in the price of our common stock could be especially detrimental to our continued operations. Any reduction in our ability to raise equity capital in the future would force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and would have a significant negative effect on our business plans and operations, including our ability to develop new products and continue our current operations. If our stock price declines, there can be no assurance that we can raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our obligations. We believe the following factors could cause the market price of our common stock to continue to fluctuate widely and could cause our common stock to trade at a price below the price at which you purchase your shares of common stock:

  • actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results;

  • announcements of new services, products, acquisitions or strategic relationships by us or our competitors;

  • changes in accounting treatments or principles;

  • changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts and in analyst recommendations; and

  • general political, economic, regulatory and market conditions.

The market price for our common stock may also be affected by our ability to meet or exceed expectations of analysts or investors. Any failure to meet these expectations, even if minor, could materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

If we issue additional shares of common stock in the future it will result in the dilution of our existing stockholders.

Our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of 150,000,000 shares of common stock. Our board of directors has the authority to issue additional shares of common stock up to the authorized capital stated in the articles of incorporation. Our board of directors may choose to issue some or all of such shares of common stock to acquire one or more businesses or to provide additional financing in the future. The issuance of any such shares of common stock will result in a reduction of the book value or market price of the outstanding shares of our common stock. If we do issue any such additional shares of common stock, such issuance also will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other stockholders. Further, any such issuance may result in a change of control of our corporation.

17


Trading of our common stock may be volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for our stockholders to resell their shares.

There is currently a limited market for our common stock and the volume of our common stock traded on any day may vary significantly from one period to another. Our common stock is quoted on OTC Market’s OTCQB. Trading in stock quoted on OTC Market’s OTCQB is often thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices, due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. The availability of buyers and sellers represented by this volatility could lead to a market price for our common stock that is unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, OTC Market’s OTCQB is not a stock exchange, and trading of securities quoted on OTC Market’s OTCQB is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a stock exchange like NASDAQ. There is no assurance that a sufficient market will develop in the stock, in which case it could be difficult for our stockholders to resell their stock.

Our stock is classed as a “penny stock”. Trading of our stock may be restricted by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s penny stock regulations which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

Our stock is a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 (excluding the value of the primary residence of such individuals) or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

18


In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for shares of our common stock.

The sale or issuance of our common stock to Lincoln Park may cause dilution and the sale of the shares of common stock acquired by Lincoln Park, or the perception that such sales may occur, could cause the price of our common stock to fall

On July 5, 2013, we entered into a Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”), pursuant to which Lincoln Park committed to purchase up to $10,000,000 of our common stock. Concurrently with the execution of the Purchase Agreement, we issued 341,858 shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park as a fee for its commitment to purchase shares of our common stock under the Purchase Agreement. The purchase shares that may be sold pursuant to the Purchase Agreement may be sold by us to Lincoln Park at our discretion from time to time over a 25-month period commencing after the SEC declared effective the related registration statement. The purchase price for the shares that we may sell to Lincoln Park under the Purchase Agreement will fluctuate based on the price of our common stock. Depending on market liquidity at the time, sales of such shares may cause the trading price of our common stock to fall.

We generally have the right to control the timing and amount of any sales of our shares to Lincoln Park, except that, pursuant to the terms of our agreements with Lincoln Park, we would be unable to sell shares to Lincoln Park if and when the closing sale price of our common stock is below $0.50 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Purchase Agreement. Additional sales of our common stock, if any, to Lincoln Park will depend upon market conditions and other factors to be determined by us. Lincoln Park may ultimately purchase all of the shares of our common stock that may be sold pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and, after it has acquired shares, Lincoln Park may sell all, some or none of those shares. Therefore, sales to Lincoln Park by us could result in substantial dilution to the interests of other holders of our common stock. Additionally, the sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park, or the anticipation of such sales, could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and at a price that we might otherwise wish to effect sales.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We do not own or lease any property. We expect to enter into a lease agreement for principal executive office space in New York City, during the first half of fiscal 2014.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

19


We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which any of our properties is the subject. In addition, we do not know of any such proceedings contemplated by any governmental authorities. We know of no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder is a party adverse to our company or has a material interest adverse to our company.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

20


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market information

Our common stock is quoted on OTCQB under the symbol “AVXL.”

The following table shows the quarterly range of high and low bid information for our common stock over the fiscal quarters for the last two fiscal years as quoted on OTCQB. We obtained the following high and low bid information from OTCQB. These over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions. Investors should not rely on historical prices of our common stock as an indication of its future price performance. On December 24, 2013, the closing price of our common stock as reported by OTCQB was $0.25 per share.

Quarter Ended High Low
September 30, 2013 $0.75 $0.49
June 30, 2013 $0.83 $0.45
March 31, 2013 $0.81 $0.51
December 31, 2012 $1.12 $.072
September 30, 2012 $1.35 $0.75
June 30, 2012 $1.26 $0.51
March 31, 2012 $1.94 $1.10
December 31, 2011 $1.90 $1.20
September 30, 2011 $2.50 $1.29

Transfer Agent

Shares of our common stock are issued in registered form. The Nevada Agency and Trust Company, 50 West Liberty Street, Reno, Nevada (Telephone: (775) 322-0626; Facsimile: (775) 322-5623) is the registrar and transfer agent for shares of our common stock.

Holders of Common Stock

As of December 24, 2013, there were 89 holders of record of our common stock. As of such date, 37,237,588 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no intention of paying any dividends on the shares of our common stock. Our current policy is to retain earnings, if any, for use in our operations and in the development of our business. Our future dividend policy will be determined from time to time by our board of directors.

21


Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans or Individual Compensation Arrangements

The following table summarizes certain information regarding our equity compensation plan or individual compensation arrangements as at September 30, 2013:

 Equity Compensation Plan Information 






Plan Category




Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)



Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuances
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column
(a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3,075,000 1.26 925,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders Nil NA NA
Total 3,075,000 1.26 925,000

Stock Option Plan

On April 17, 2007, our directors adopted the 2007 Stock Option Plan. On May 25, 2007, our stockholders ratified and approved the 2007 Stock Option Plan at the annual meeting of stockholders. As of September 30, 2013, 3,075,000 options have been granted to employees, directors, officers and consultants of our company.

The purpose of the 2007 Stock Option Plan is to retain the services of valued key employees and consultants of our company and such other persons as will be select in accordance with the 2007 Stock Option Plan, and to encourage such persons to acquire a greater proprietary interest in our company, thereby strengthening their incentive to achieve the objectives of the shareholders of our company, and to serve as an aid and inducement in the hiring of new employees and to provide an equity incentive to consultants.

On February 2, 2011 we amended and restated our 2007 stock option plan to increase the number of shares authorized to be issued under the plan to 4,000,000.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

22


Since the beginning of our fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, we have not sold any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 that were not previously reported in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q or in a current report on Form 8-K.

Purchases of Equity Securities by Our Company and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide information under this item.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are generally written in the future tense and/or are preceded by words such as “may,” “should,” “forecast,” “could,” “expect,” “suggest,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” or other similar words. The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K involve a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are expressly advised to review and consider those Risk Factors, which include risks associated with (1) our ability to successfully conduct clinical and preclinical trials for our product candidates, (2) our ability to obtain required regulatory approvals to develop and market our product candidates, (3) our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms, (4) our ability to execute our development plan on time and on budget, (5) our ability to obtain commercial partners, (6) our ability, whether alone or with commercial partners, to successfully commercialize any of our product candidates that may be approved for sale, and (7) our ability to identify and obtain additional product candidates. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore there can be no assurance that such statements will be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved. Furthermore, past performance in operations and share price is not necessarily indicative of future performance. Except as required by applicable laws including the securities laws of the United States and Canada, we disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Our Business

23


We are a pharmaceutical company engaged in the development of drug candidates. Our lead compounds ANAVEX 2-73 and ANAVEX PLUS, a combination of ANAVEX 2-73 with donepezil (Aricept®) are being developed to treat Alzheimer’s disease and potentially other central nervous system (CNS) diseases.

In pre-clinical studies conducted in France, and in Greece, ANAVEX 2-73 demonstrated anti-amnesic and neuroprotective properties in various animal models including the transgenic mouse model Tg2576. Based on pre-clinical studies, we sponsored a Phase 1 single ascending dose study of ANAVEX 2-73 initiated and completed in 2011. This study was conducted in Germany in collaboration with ABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services. The study indicated that ANAVEX 2-73 was well tolerated by study subjects in doses up to 55mg.

Recent Corporate Developments

Since the commencement of our fourth quarter ended September 30, 2013, we have experienced the following significant corporate developments:

  • On July 5, 2013, we issued 4,208,910 units in settlement of $549,000 in promissory notes, $26,058 of accrued interest on these notes, and $1,108,506 in other accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $0.75 per share until July 5, 2018.

  • On July 5, 2013, we issued 2,196,133 units at $0.40 per unit for gross proceeds of $878,453 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $0.75 per share until July 5, 2018. We paid finder’s fees of $89,680 and issued warrants to purchase 43,923 shares of our common stock at $0.75 per share until July 5, 2018 in connection with this private placement. In addition, we incurred share issuance costs of $16,494.

  • On July 5, 2013, we entered into the $10,000,000 Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (the “Financing”) pursuant to which we may sell and issue to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park is obligated to purchase, up to $10,000,000 in value of our shares of common stock from time to time over a 25 month period. In connection with the Financing, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with Lincoln Park whereby we agreed to file a registration statement with the SEC covering the shares of our common stock that may be issued to Lincoln Park under the Purchase Agreement. On October 23, 2013, the registration statement was declared effective by the SEC.

  • On July 5, 2013, Christopher U. Missling, PhD. accepted the appointment by our board of directors to serve as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer, and to serve as a director of the company. Dr. Missling has over twenty (20) years of healthcare industry experience in big pharmaceutical, biotech industry and investment banking. Most recently, from March, 2007 until his appointment, Dr. Missling served as the head of healthcare investment banking at Brimberg & Co. in New York, New York. Also, Dr. Missling served as the Chief Financial Officer of Curis, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRIS) and ImmunoGen, Inc. (NASDAQ:IMGN). Dr. Missling earned his MS and PhD from the University of Munich and an MBA from Northwestern University Kellogg School of Management.

24


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenue

We have not earned any revenues since our inception on January 23, 2004. We are still in the development stage and do not anticipate earning any revenues until we can establish an alliance with other companies to develop, co-develop, license, acquire or market our products.

Expenses

Our expenses for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

    Year ended September 30,     Change  
    2013     2012     $     %  
Accounting and audit fees $  136,758   $ 139,761     (3,003 )   (2.1% )
Amortization   576     1,858     (1,282 )   (69.0% )
Bank charges and interest   4,397     5,963     (1,566 )   (26.3% )
Consulting   271,898     1,155,366     (883,468 )   (76.5% )
Insurance   16,125     10,844     5,281     48.7%  
Investor relations   128,575     108,138     20,437     18.9%  
Legal fees   176,318     142,923     33,395     23.4%  
Office and miscellaneous   4,019     9,147     (5,128 )   (56.1% )
Registration and filing fees   33,634     26,794     6,840     25.5%  
Rent   12,000     -     12,000     NA  
Research and development   263,847     2,653,860     (2,390,013 )   (90.1% )
Salaries and wages   1,067,294     -     1,067,294     NA  
Travel   19,695     66,837     (47,142 )   (70.5% )
Website design and maintenance   2,231     -     2,231     NA  
Total expenses $ 2,137,367   $ 4,321,491     2,184,124     (50.5% )

Year ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Expenses for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 decreased by $2,184,124 over the same period in 2012. The principal contributors to the decrease were:

  1.

A decrease in consulting fees of $883,468 primarily as a result of decreased management infrastructure as well as a decrease in stock based compensation expense from stock options granted to consultants and vesting during the comparative period;

  2.

A decrease in research and development expenses of $2,390,013 due to the delay of clinical trials pending the closing of financing to fund these trials. This included the termination of lab fees of $125,000 per month accruing during the comparative period;


25



  3.

These decreases were offset by an increase in salaries and wages expense of $1,067,294 in connection with the appointment of our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer, which included stock based compensation expense of $1,002,500 associated with the granting of fully vested options upon his appointment.

Other income

Other income and (loss) for the year ended September 30, 2013, amounted to $(1,562,679) as compared to a loss of $(3,980,214) for the year ended September 30, 2012. The decrease in net other losses is primarily attributable to

  a)

a reduction of losses from the extinguishment of debt of $3,334,005, offset by an increase in losses on extinguishment of accounts payable of $976,880. During fiscal 2013, we recorded a loss of $1,472,208 in connection with the extinguishment of five promissory notes plus accrued interest totaling $575,058, and trade accounts payable totaling $1,108,506. During fiscal 2012, we recorded a loss of $3,829,333 for the extinguishment of four promissory notes and accrued interest totaling $1,350,251. The reduced loss is a result of different settlement terms agreed to with the lenders;

  b)

a reduction in interest expense of $87,000 as a result of the decreased debt levels during the current period from the settlement of promissory notes in the fourth quarter of 2013;

  c)

a reduction of accretion expense of $98,081 as a result of promissory notes settled during the 2012 fiscal year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital

  2013 2012
Current Assets 393,449 12,577
Current Liabilities 1,952,660 2,888,324
Working Capital Deficiency $ (1,559,211) (2,875,747)

As of September 30, 2013, we had $345,074 in cash, an increase of $333,712 from September 30, 2012. As of September 30, 2013, we had a working capital deficiency of $1,559,211, a decrease in deficit of $1,316,536 from September 30, 2012.

The principal reason for the increase in working capital relates to the extinguishment of five promissory notes plus accrued interest totaling $575,058, and trade accounts payable totaling $1,108,506, in exchange for shares of our common stock.

The increase in cash during the period relates to cash generated through financing activities from debt and equity issuances. We generated cash of $861,285, after issuance costs, from the issuance of capital stock, and we generated cash of $250,000 through the issuance of promissory notes. Some of these promissory notes issued were also settled in exchange for the issuance of capital stock during the year.

26


We do not have sufficient capital to execute our business plan over the next twelve months. We anticipate that we will require $6,000,000 for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2014 to continue our operations. If we are not able to secure additional financing, we will not be able to implement and fund this work.

Going Concern

At September 30, 2013, we had an accumulated deficit of $41,204,972 since our inception and incurred a net loss of $3,700,046 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. We expect to incur further losses in the development of our business, all of which casts substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph regarding substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern in their report on our annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.

Future Financing

We will require additional financing to fund our planned operations, including further strengthening our patent portfolio, securing licensing or patent rights for other compounds and related technology and any further intellectual property that we may acquire and commencing clinical development.

On July 5, 2013, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Lincoln Park initially purchased 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $100,000. The Company has the right, in its sole discretion over a 25-month period, to sell to Lincoln Park up to the additional aggregate commitment of $9.9 Million of shares of common stock. There are no upper limits on the per share price that Lincoln Park may pay to purchase such common stock. Furthermore, the Company controls the timing and amount of any future sales, if any, of shares of common stock to Lincoln Park except that, pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, we would be unable to sell shares to Lincoln Park if and when the closing sale price of our common stock is below $0.50 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Purchase Agreement.. Lincoln Park has no right to require any sales and is obligated to purchase common stock as directed by the Company.

Other than our rights related to the Lincoln Park financing, there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, if and when it is needed, we will be forced to delay or scale down some or all of our research and development activities or perhaps even cease the operation of our business.

Since inception we have funded our operations primarily through equity and debt financings and we expect that we will continue to fund our operations through the equity and debt financing. If we raise additional financing by issuing equity securities, our existing stockholders’ ownership will be diluted. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

27


There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain operations at a level sufficient for investors to obtain a return on their investment in our common stock. Further, we may continue to be unprofitable.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our stockholders.

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. We believe that understanding the basis and nature of the estimates and assumptions involved with the following aspects of our financial statements is critical to an understanding of our financials.

We base our assumptions and estimates on historical experience and other sources that we believe to be reasonable at the time. Actual results may vary from our estimates due to changes in circumstances, weather, politics, global economics, mechanical problems, general business conditions and other factors. Our significant estimates are related to the valuation of warrants and options.

There are accounting policies that we believe are significant to the presentation of our financial statements. The most significant of these accounting policies relates to the accounting for our research and development expenses and stock-based compensation expense.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and developments costs are expensed as incurred. These expenses are comprised of the costs of our proprietary research and development efforts, including salaries, facilities costs, overhead costs and other related expenses as well as costs incurred in connection with third-party collaboration efforts. Milestone payments made by us to third parties are expensed when the specific milestone has been achieved.

In addition, we incur expenses in respect of the acquisition of intellectual property relating to patents and trademarks. The probability of success and length of time in developing commercial applications of the drugs subject to the acquired patents and trademarks is difficult to determine and numerous risks and uncertainties exist with respect to the timely completion of the development projects. There is no assurance the acquired patents and trademarks will ever be successfully commercialized. Due to these risks and uncertainties, we expense the acquisition of patents and trademarks.

Stock-based Compensation

We account for all stock-based payments and awards under the fair value based method.

28


Stock-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, or liabilities incurred, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of stock-based payments to non-employees is periodically re-measured until the counterparty performance is complete, and any change therein is recognized over the vesting period of the award and in the same manner as if we had paid cash instead of paying with or using equity based instruments. The cost of the stock-based payments to non-employees that is fully vested and non-forfeitable as at the grant date is measured and recognized at that date, unless there is a contractual term for services in which case such compensation would be amortized over the contractual term.

We account for the granting of share purchase options to employees using the fair value method whereby all awards to employees will be recorded at fair value on the date of the grant. The fair value of all share purchase options are expensed over their vesting period with a corresponding increase to additional capital surplus. Upon exercise of share purchase options, the consideration paid by the option holder, together with the amount previously recognized in additional capital surplus, is recorded as an increase to share capital.

We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value of share purchase options at the date of the grant. Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate and therefore the Black-Scholes model does not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our share purchase options.

Derivative Liabilities

From time to time, we may issue convertible promissory notes which include embedded conversion options which, dependent on their specific contractual terms, may be required to be accounted for as separate derivative liabilities. These liabilities are required to be measured at fair value. These instruments are then adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end. Any increase or decrease in the fair value is recorded in results of operations as change in fair value of derivative liabilities. In determining the appropriate fair value, we use the binomial pricing model.

Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate and therefore the binomial model does not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of these instruments.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

New accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standards setting bodies that we adopt according to the various timetables the FASB specifies. We do not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements will have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide information under this item.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

29


 

 

 

 

ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2013 and 2012

 

 

F-1


 
Tel: 212-885-8000
Fax: 212-697-1299
www.bdo.com
100 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Directors and Stockholders,
Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(a Development Stage Company)
New York, NY

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. (a corporation in the development stage) as of September 30, 2013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and changes in capital deficit for the year then ended and for the period from inception (January 23, 2004) to September 30, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in capital deficit for the period from inception (January 23, 2004) to September 30, 2012. Such statements are included in the cumulative inception to September 30, 2013 totals of the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows and reflect total revenues and net loss of $0 and $36,954,122, respectively, of the related cumulative totals. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to amounts for the period from inception (January 23, 2004) to September 30, 2012, included in the cumulative totals, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors.

We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. at September 30, 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended and for the period from inception to September 30, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms.

BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.

F-2




 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $41,204,972 and negative working capital of $1,559,211 at September 30, 2013 and incurred a net loss of $3,700,046 for the year then ended. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

New York, NY
December 30, 2013

F-3



Tel: 604  688 5421
Fax: 604  688 5132
www.bdo.ca

BDO Canada LLP
600 Cathedral Place
925 West Georgia Street
Vancouver BC  V6C 3L2  Canada

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Directors and Stockholders,
Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(a Development Stage Company)

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2012 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in capital deficit for the year then ended and for the period from January 23, 2004 (date of inception) to September 30, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. at September 30, 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended and for the period from January 23, 2004 (date of inception) to September 30, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying financial statements were prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As at September 30, 2012, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $37,504,926 and had incurred a net loss of $8,301,705 for the year then ended. These conditions raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters were described in Note 1 to the financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2012. The financial statements did not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ BDO Canada LLP

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

December 28, 2012

 

 

BDO Canada LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership, is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms.

F-4


ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, 2013 and 2012

ASSETS            
    2013     2012  
             
Current            
Cash $  345,074   $  11,362  
Prepaid expenses   48,375     -  
Deferred financing charge   -     1,215  
    393,449     12,577  
Equipment   -     576  
  $  393,449   $  13,153  
             
LIABILITIES            
             
Current            
   Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 1,741,797   $  2,589,324  
   Promissory notes payable   210,863     299,000  
    1,952,660     2,888,324  
Derivative liability   904,000     -  
    2,856,660     2,888,324  
             
             
CAPITAL DEFICIT            
             
Capital stock            
   Authorized: 
         150,000,000 common shares, par value $0.001 per share 
   Issued and outstanding: 
         37,237,588 common shares (September 30, 2012 - 30,240,687)
  37,238     30,241  
Additional paid-in capital   38,644,523     34,599,514  
Share subscriptions received   60,000     -  
Deficit accumulated during the development stage   (41,204,972 )   (37,504,926 )
    (2,463,211 )   (2,875,171 )
  $  393,449   $  13,153  

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

F-5


ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
and for the period from January 23, 2004 (Date of Inception) to September 30, 2013

                January 23, 2004  
    Year ended September 30,     (Date of Inception) to  
    2013     2012     September 30, 2013  
Expenses                  
Accounting and audit fees $  136,758   $  139,761   $  798,872  
Amortization and depreciation   576     1,858     5,631  
Bank charges and interest   4,397     5,963     46,704  
Consulting fees - Note 8 and 9   271,898     1,155,366     12,015,989  
Insurance   16,125     10,844     75,121  
Investor relations   128,575     108,138     960,282  
Legal fees   176,318     142,923     846,343  
Management fees - Note 8   -     -     14,625  
Office and miscellaneous expense   4,019     9,147     151,703  
Registration and filing fees   33,634     26,794     188,032  
Rent and administration   12,000     -     236,670  
Research and development - Note 9   263,847     2,653,860     12,822,796  
Salaries and wages - Notes 8 and 9   1,067,294     -     1,067,294  
Travel   19,695     66,837     760,850  
Website design and maintenance   2,231     -     30,648  
                   
Loss before other income (expenses)   (2,137,367 )   (4,321,491 )   (30,021,560 )
                   
Other income (expenses)                  
Interest and financing fees   (51,341 )   (138,341 )   (677,362 )
Accretion of debt discount   -     (98,081 )   (2,174,661 )
Change in fair value of derivative liability   15,000     67,500     (448,274 )
Debt conversion expense   -     -     (504,160 )
Loss on settlement of accounts payable   (976,880 )   -     (1,754,933 )
Loss on extinguishment of debt   (495,328 )   (3,829,333 )   (5,010,868 )
Foreign exchange gain (loss)   (54,130 )   18,041     (62,350 )
                   
Net loss for the period $  (3,700,046 ) $  (8,301,705 ) $  (40,654,168 )
                   
Basic and diluted loss per share $  (0.12 ) $  (0.29 )      
                   
Weighted average number of shares outstanding   31,908,441     28,168,784        

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

F-6


ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
and for the period from January 23, 2004 (Date of Inception) to September 30, 2013

                January 23, 2004  
    Year ended September 30,     (Date of Inception) to  
    2013     2012     September 30, 2013  
                   
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities                  
Net loss for the period $  (3,700,046 ) $  (8,301,705 ) $  (40,654,168 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:                  
Amortization and depreciation   576     1,858     5,631  
Accretion of debt discount   -     98,081     2,174,661  
Stock-based compensation   1,002,500     302,208     5,845,047  
Amortization of deferred financing charge   1,215     62,399     163,927  
Change in fair value of derivative liability   (15,000 )   (67,500 )   448,274  
Consulting expense recorded in exchange for shares to be issued   -     -     236,337  
Common shares issued for consulting expenses   -     15,895     406,405  
Promissory note issued for severance   -     -     71,500  
Common shares issued for severance   -     75,000     415,600  
Common shares issued for research and development expenses   -     -     800,000  
Management fees contributed   -     -     14,625  
Debt conversion expense   -     -     504,160  
Loss on settlement of accounts payable   976,880     -     1,754,933  
Loss on extinguishment of debt   495,328     3,829,333     5,010,868  
Rent contributed   -     -     3,750  
Unrealized foreign exchange   (4,937 )   -     (4,937 )
Changes in non-cash working capital balances related to operations:                  
VAT recoverable   -     809     -  
Prepaid expenses   -     9,630     -  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   465,911     2,281,052     6,238,459  
Net cash used in operating activities   (777,573 )   (1,692,940 )   (16,564,928 )
                   
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities                  
Acquisition of equipment   -     -     (5,631 )
Net cash used in investing activities   -     -     (5,631 )
                   
Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities                  
Issuance of common shares, net of share issue costs   801,285     996,250     11,048,118  
Share subscriptions received   60,000     -     60,000  
Proceeds from promissory notes   250,000     581,500     5,649,000  
Financing fees   -     (8,150 )   (108,150 )
Repayment of promissory note   -     -     (100,000 )
Due to related parties   -     -     33,665  
Shareholder advances   -     -     333,000  
Net cash provided by financing activities   1,111,285     1,569,600     16,915,633  
                   
Increase (decrease) in cash during the period   333,712     (123,340 )   345,074  
Cash, beginning of period   11,362     134,702     -  
Cash, end of period $  345,074   $  11,362   $  345,074  

Supplemental Cash Flow Information - Note 11

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

F-7


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Capital Deficit
For the period from January 23, 2004 (Date of Inception) to September 30, 2013

                            Deficit        
    Common Stock     Accumulated        
    Shares     Par Value     Additional     Common     During the        
                Paid-in     Shares to be     Development        
                Capital     Issued     Stage     Total  
                                     
Capital stock issued for cash on January 23, 2004 - at $0.0033   12,000,000   $  12,000   $  28,000   $  -   $ -   $  40,000  
Net loss from January 23, 2004 to September 30, 2004   -     -     -     -     (14,395 )   (14,395 )
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2004   12,000,000     12,000     28,000     -     (14,395 )   25,605  
Capital stock issued for cash on December 31, 2004 - at $0.0033                                    
    7,200,000     7,200     16,800     -     -     24,000  
Management fees contributed   -     -     13,000     -     -     13,000  
Rent contributed   -     -     3,000     -     -     3,000  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     -     (91,625 )   (91,625 )
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2005   19,200,000     19,200     60,800     -     (106,020 )   (26,020 )
Management fees contributed   -     -     1,625     -     -     1,625  
Rent contributed   -     -     750     -     -     750  
Debt forgiven by directors   -     -     33,666     -     -     33,666  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     -     (25,532 )   (25,532 )
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2006   19,200,000     19,200     96,841     -     (131,552 )   (15,511 )
Capital stock issued for research and development services on September 24, 2007 - at $3.60   222,222     222     799,778     -     -     800,000  
Capital stock issued for settlement of loan payable on September 25, 2007 - at $3.60   92,500     93     332,907     -     -     333,000  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     -     (1,579,993 )   (1,579,993 )
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2007   19,514,722   $  19,515   $  1,229,526   $  -   $ (1,711,545 ) $  (462,504 )

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

F-8


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Capital Deficit
For the period from January 23, 2004 (Date of Inception) to September 30, 2013

                            Deficit        
    Common Stock     Accumulated        
    Shares     Par Value     Additional     Common     During the        
                Paid-in     Shares to be     Development        
                Capital     Issued     Stage     Total  
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2007 - brought forward   19,514,722   $  19,515   $  1,229,526   $  -   $  (1,711,545 ) $  (462,504 )
Capital stock issued for cash on December 10, 2007 - at $3.50   150,000     150     524,850     -     -     525,000  
Capital stock issued for consulting services on December 18, 2007 - at $3.86   50,000     50     192,950     -     -     193,000  
Capital stock issued in settlement of debt on December 18, 2007 - at $4.50   10,000     10     44,990     -     -     45,000  
Stock-based compensation for shares issued at a discount   -     -     65,000     -     -     65,000  
Capital stock issued for severance on May 15, 2008 - at $5.24   65,000     65     340,535     -     -     340,600  
Common shares to be issued for consulting services   -     -     -     252,599     -     252,599  
Common stock issued for consulting services on August 19, 2008 - at $5.07   25,000     25     126,725     (126,750 )   -     -  
Capital stock issued for cash on August 19, 2008 - at $4.25   142,698     142     606,325     -     -     606,467  
Stock-based compensation   -     -     1,493,937     -     -     1,493,937  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     -     (5,351,269 )   (5,351,269 )
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2008   19,957,420   $  19,957   $  4,624,838   $  125,849   $  (7,062,814 ) $  (2,292,170 )

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

F-9


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Capital Deficit
For the period from January 23, 2004 (Date of Inception) to September 30, 2013

                            Deficit        
    Common Stock     Accumulated        
    Shares     Par Value     Additional     Common     During the        
                Paid-in     Shares to be     Development        
                Capital     Issued     Stage     Total  
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2008 - brought forward   19,957,420   $  19,957   $  4,624,838   $  125,849   $  (7,062,814 ) $  (2,292,170 )
Stock-based compensation   -     -     812,336     -     -     812,336  
Capital stock issued for consulting services on November 20, 2008 - $2.63   25,000     25     65,725     (65,750 )   -     -  
Capital stock issued for consulting services on February 20, 2009 - $2.50   25,000     25     62,475     (62,500 )   -     -  
Capital stock issued for cash on March 6, 2009 - at $2.25   89,148     89     200,494     -     -     200,583  
Capital stock issued for consulting services on March 20, 2009 - at $2.00   2,500     3     4,997     -     -     5,000  
Capital stock issued for cash on March 20, 2009 - at $2.25   10,800     11     24,289     -     -     24,300  
Capital stock issued for cash on June 11, 2009 - at $2.25   36,000     36     80,964     -     -     81,000  
Capital stock issued for services on June 11, 2009 - at $2.25   29,227     29     65,731     -     -     65,760  
Capital stock issued for cash on June 19, 2009 - at $2.25   495,556     496     1,114,504     -     -     1,115,000  
Capital stock issued for finders' fees on June 26, 2009 - at $2.51   22,222     22     55,755     -     -     55,777  
Shares to be issued for consulting services - Note 8   -     -     -     236,337     -     236,337  
Capital stock issued for cash on August 19, 2009 - at $2.25   128,888     129     289,869     -     -     289,998  
Less: Finders fees               (72,850 )   -     -     (72,850 )
Beneficial conversion features on convertible debt issuances   -     -     333,056     -     -     333,056  
Extinguishment of debt   -     -     487,469     -     -     487,469  
Cancellation of common shares   (75,000 )   (75 )   234,011     (233,936 )   -     -  
Share subscriptions received   -     -     -     300,000     -     300,000  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     -     (5,499,419 )   (5,499,419 )
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2009   20,746,761   $  20,747   $  8,383,663   $  300,000   $  (12,562,233 ) $  (3,857,823 )

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

F-10


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Capital Deficit
For the period from January 23, 2004 (Date of Inception) to September 30, 2013

                            Deficit        
    Common Stock     Accumulated        
    Shares     Par Value     Additional     Common     During the        
                Paid-in     Shares to be     Development        
                Capital     Issued     Stage     Total  
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2009 - brought forward   20,746,761   $  20,747   $  8,383,663   $  300,000   $  (12,562,233 ) $  (3,857,823 )
Cumulative effect of accounting changes   -     -     (333,056 )   -     (550,804 )   (883,860 )
Capital stock issued for cash on October 2, 2009 - at $2.25   266,666     267     599,733     (300,000 )   -     300,000  
Capital stock issued in settlement of promissory note on February 2, 2010 - at $2.02   49,505     49     99,951     -     -     100,000  
Capital stock issued for cash on April 9, 2010 - at $2.60   92,499     93     240,405     -     -     240,498  
Capital stock issued in settlement of debt on April 30, 2010 - at $2.85   9,825     9     27,991     -     -     28,000  
Finders' fees paid in cash   -     -     (24,050 )   -     -     (24,050 )
Capital stock issued for cash on June 29, 2010 - at $2.50   941,000     941     2,351,559     -     -     2,352,500  
Finders' fees paid in cash   -     -     (206,500 )   -     -     (206,500 )
Capital stock issued in settlement of debt on July 5, 2010 - at $2.50   400,000     400     999,600     -     -     1,000,000  
Capital stock issued for cash on September 3, 2010 - at $2.75   163,000     163     448,087     -     -     448,250  
Capital stock issued for finders' fees on September 3, 2010 - at $2.75   9,000     9     (9 )   -     -     -  
Finders' fees paid in cash   -     -     (15,125 )   -     -     (15,125 )
Shares issud on conversion of promissory note on September 30, 2010 - at $2.25   328,058     328     737,802     -     -     738,130  
Shares issud on conversion of promissory note on September 30, 2010 - at $2.35   510,638     511     1,199,489     -     -     1,200,000  
Reclassification of dervative liability on modification of note   -     -     3,144,520     -     -     3,144,520  
Settlementterms of accounts payable   -     -     444,000     -     -     444,000  
Stock-based compensation   -     -     770,055     -     -     770,055  
Equity component of convertible promissory note   -     -     44,220     -     -     44,220  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     -     (8,783,037 )   (8,783,037 )
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2010   23,516,952   $  23,517   $  18,912,335   $  -   $  (21,896,074 ) $  (2,960,222 )

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

F-11


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Capital Deficit
For the period from January 23, 2004 (Date of Inception) to September 30, 2013

                            Deficit        
    Common Stock     Accumulated        
    Shares     Par Value     Additional     Common     During the        
                Paid-in     Shares to be     Development        
                Capital     Issued     Stage     Total  
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2010 - brought forward   23,516,952   $  23,517   $  18,912,335   $  -   $  (21,896,074 ) $  (2,960,222 )
Capital stock issued for cash on November 18, 2010 - at $2.75   393,846     393     1,082,682     -     -     1,083,075  
Less: Share issue costs   -     -     (65,363 )   -     -     (65,363 )
Capital stock issued for finders' fees on November 18, 2010 - at $2.75   3,636     4     (4 )   -     -     -  
Shares issued on the conversion of promissory note on November 18, 2010 - at $2.25   853,075     853     1,918,565     -     -     1,919,418  
Debt conversion expense   -     -     504,160     -     -     504,160  
Shares issued on the conversion of a promissory note on November 18, 2010 - at $4.12   145,063     145     597,515     -     -     597,660  
Capital stock issued in settlement of debt on November 18, 2010 - at $4.12   181,818     182     748,908     -     -     749,090  
Capital stock issued for cash on November 25, 2010 - at $3.35 29,851 30 99,970 - - 100,000
Capital stock issued for finders' fees on on November 25, 2010 - at $3.35   2,985     3     (3 )   -     -     -  
Capital stock issued for cash on February 1, 2011 - at $3.75                                    
    61,014     61     228,739     -     -     228,800  
Capital stock issued for cash on May 3, 2011 - at $3.00   33,334     34     99,966     -     -     100,000  
Capital stock issued on exercise of warrants for cash on June 19, 2011 - at $2.25   700,000     700     1,574,300     -     -     1,575,000  
Equity units issued in settlement of an account payable on September 28, 2011   650,000     650     1,059,313             1,059,963  
Stock-based compensation   -     -     1,273,162     -     -     1,273,162  
Net loss for the period   -     -     -     -     (7,307,147 )   (7,307,147 )
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2011   26,571,574   $  26,572   $  28,034,245   $  -   $  (29,203,221 ) $  (1,142,404 )

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

F-12


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Capital Deficit
For the period from January 23, 2004 (Date of Inception) to September 30, 2013

                            Deficit        
    Common Stock     Accumulated        
    Shares     Par Value     Additional     Common     During the        
                Paid-in     Shares to be     Development        
                Capital     Issued     Stage     Total  
Balance, September 30, 2011 - brought forward   26,571,574   $  26,572   $  28,034,245   $  -   $  (29,203,221 ) $  (1,142,404 )
                                     
Capital stock issued for cash on December 6, 2011 - at $1.25   615,600     616     768,884     -     -     769,500  
Less: Share issue costs   -     -     (77,000 )   -     -     (77,000 )
                                     
Capital stock issued for cash on February 9, 2012 - at $1.25   270,000     270     337,230     -     -     337,500  
Less: Share issue costs   -     -     (33,750 )   -     -     (33,750 )
                                     
Equity units issued for services on February 9, 2012 - at $1.99   8,000     8     15,888     -     -     15,896  
Equity units issued for settlement of loans payable on May 31, 2012   2,700,513     2,700     5,176,884     -     -     5,179,584  
Capital stock issued for services on July 12, 2012 - at $1.00   75,000     75     74,925     -     -     75,000  
Stock-based compensation   -     -     302,208     -     -     302,208  
Net loss for the period   -     -     -     -     (8,301,705 )   (8,301,705 )
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2012   30,240,687     30,241     34,599,514     -     (37,504,926 )   (2,875,171 )
Equity units issued for settlement of loans payable on July 5, 2013 - Note 5   4,208,910     4,209     2,563,011     -     -     2,567,220  
                                     
Capital stock issued for cash on July 5, 2013 - at $0.40 - Note 6   2,196,133     2,196     563,257     -     -     565,453  
Less: Share issue costs               (112,174 )   -     -     (112,174 )
Initial purchase shares issued under equity line on July 5, 2013 - at $0.40 - Note 7   591,858     592     99,750     -     -     100,342  
Less: Share issue costs   -     -     (71,335 )   -     -     (71,335 )
Common stock to be issued for cash - at $0.50   -     -     -     60,000     -     60,000  
Stock-based compensation   -     -     1,002,500                 1,002,500  
Net loss for the period   -     -     -     -     (3,700,046 )   (3,700,046 )
                                     
Balance, September 30, 2013   37,237,588   $  37,238   $  38,644,523   $  60,000   $  (41,204,972 ) $  (2,463,211 )

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

F-13


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012

Note 1 Business Description, Basis of Presentation and Liquidity
   
 

Business

   

Anavex Life Sciences Corp. (the “Company”) is a pharmaceutical company engaged in the development of drug candidates.

   

The Company’s lead compound, ANAVEX 2-73 is being developed to treat Alzheimer’s disease through disease modification.

   

In pre-clinical studies conducted in France, and in Greece, ANAVEX 2-73 demonstrated anti- amnesic and neuroprotective properties. Based on these pre-clinical studies, the Company sponsored a Phase 1 single ascending dose study of ANAVEX 2-73, which was initiated and completed in 2011. This study was conducted in Germany in collaboration with ABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services. The study indicated that ANAVEX 2-73 was well tolerated by study subjects in doses up to 55mg. During the year ended September 30, 2013, clinical trials had been delayed due to lack of funding. On July 5, 2013, the Company completed the closing of a private placement offering and a $10,000,000 purchase agreement (Note 7), the proceeds from which the Company will use to further its business plan and clinical trials of ANAVEX 2-73.

   

The Company plans to initiate a multiple ascending dose study of ANAVEX 2-73 in the first half of fiscal year 2014. Additionally we intend to identify and initiate discussions with potential partners in the next 12 months. Further, we may acquire or develop new intellectual property and assign, license, or otherwise transfer our intellectual property to further our goals.

   
 

Basis of Presentation and Liquidity

   

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the instructions to Form 10-K.


F-14


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 2

Note 1 Business Description, Basis of Presentation and Liquidity – (cont’d)
   

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its obligations and commitments in the normal course of operations. Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown, and these financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. At September 30, 2013, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $41,204,972 (2012 - $37,504,926), had a working capital deficit of $1,559,211 and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which casts substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management has no formal plan in place to address this but considers obtaining additional funds by equity financing and/or from issuing promissory notes. Management expects the Company's cash requirement over the next twelve months to be approximately $6,000,000. While the Company is expending its best efforts to achieve the above plans, there is no assurance that any such activity will generate funds for operations.

   
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

  a)

Use of Estimates

     
 

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses in the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to deferred income tax asset valuations, asset impairment, conversion features embedded in convertible notes payable, derivative valuations, stock based compensation and loss contingencies. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.


F-15


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 3

Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)

  b)

Principles of Consolidation

     
 

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Anavex Life Sciences (France) SA, a company incorporated under the laws of France. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.

     
  c)

Development Stage Company

     
 

The Company is devoting substantially all of its present efforts to establish a new business and none of its planned principal operations have commenced. All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

     
  d)

Equipment

     
 

Equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated at 33% per annum on the straight-line basis.

     
  e)

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

     
 

The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are grouped with other assets to the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made.

     
  f)

Financial Instruments

     
 

The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments, consisting of cash and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturity of such instruments. Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for similar terms and based on the short term duration of the debt instruments, the carrying value of the promissory notes payable approximate their fair value. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.


F-16


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 4

Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)

  g)

Foreign Currency Translation

     
 

The functional currency of the Company is the US dollar. Monetary items denominated in a foreign currency are translated into US dollars at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date and non-monetary items are translated at exchange rates prevailing when the assets were acquired or obligations incurred. Foreign currency denominated expense items are translated at exchange rates prevailing at the transaction date. Unrealized gains or losses arising from the translations are credited or charged to income in the period in which they occur.

     
  h)

Research and Development Expenses

     
 

Research and developments costs are expensed as incurred. These expenses are comprised of the costs of the Company’s proprietary research and development efforts, including salaries, facilities costs, overhead costs and other related expenses as well as costs incurred in connection with third-party collaboration efforts. Milestone payments made by the Company to third parties are expensed when the specific milestone has been achieved.

     
 

In addition, the Company incurs expenses in respect of the acquisition of intellectual property relating to patents. The probability of success and length of time to developing commercial applications of the drugs subject to the acquired patents and trademarks is difficult to determine and numerous risks and uncertainties exist with respect to the timely completion of the development projects. There is no assurance the acquired patents will ever be successfully commercialized. Due to these risks and uncertainties, the acquisition costs of patents do not meet the definition of an asset and thus are expensed as incurred.

     
  i)

Income Taxes

     
 

The Company has adopted the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.


F-17


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 5

Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)

  i)

Income Taxes – (cont’d)

     
 

The Company has adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740 "Income Taxes" regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The Company initially recognizes tax positions in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions are initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Application requires numerous estimates based on available information. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating its tax positions and tax benefits, and its recognized tax positions and tax benefits may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. As additional information is obtained, there may be a need to periodically adjust the recognized tax positions and tax benefits. These periodic adjustments may have a material impact on the consolidated statements of operations.

     
  j)

Basic and Diluted Loss per Share

     
 

The basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per common share is computed similar to basic loss per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. For the year ended September 30, 2013, loss per share excludes 12,224,479 (2012 – 6,025,141) potentially dilutive common shares (related to outstanding options and warrants) as their effect was anti-dilutive.


F-18


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 6

Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)

  k)

Stock-based Compensation

     
 

The Company accounts for all stock-based payments and awards under the fair value based method.

     
 

Stock-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, or liabilities incurred, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of stock-based payments to non-employees is periodically re-measured until the counterparty performance is complete, and any change therein is recognized over the vesting period of the award and in the same manner as if the Company had paid cash instead of paying with or using equity based instruments. Compensation costs for stock-based payments with graded vesting are recognized on a straight-line basis. The cost of the stock-based payments to non- employees that are fully vested and non-forfeitable as at the grant date is measured and recognized at that date, unless there is a contractual term for services in which case such compensation would be amortized over the contractual term.

     
 

The Company accounts for the granting of share purchase options to employees using the fair value method whereby all awards to employees will be recorded at fair value on the date of the grant. The fair value of all share purchase options are expensed over their vesting period with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital.

     
 

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value of share purchase options at the date of the grant. Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates.

     
  l)

Fair Value Measurements

     
 

The fair value hierarchy under GAAP is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:


  Level 1 -

quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

     
Level 2 -

observable inputs other than Level I, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, and model-derived prices whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable; and

     
Level 3 -

assets and liabilities whose significant value drivers are unobservable by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.


F-19


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 7

Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)

  l)

Fair Value Measurements – (cont’d)

     
 

The book value of cash and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to the short term maturity of those instruments. Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company under similar terms, the book value of promissory notes payable approximates their fair values. The Company’s promissory notes payable are based on Level 2 inputs in the ASC 820 fair value hierarchy.

     
 

At September 30, 2013, the Company’s Level 3 liabilities consisted of share purchase warrants that are required to be accounted for as liabilities pursuant to ASC 815 because the terms of the warrants contain provisions that are in violation of the fixed for fixed criteria of that guidance.

     
 

The Company calculated the fair value at the inception of these contracts and as at September 30, 2013 using the binomial option pricing model to determine the fair value, using the following assumptions:


      At September
    At inception 30, 2013
       
  Risk-free interest rate 0.28% 0.10%
       
  Expected life (years) 1.49 1.25
       
  Expected volatility 81.57% 77.51%
       
  Stock price $0.61 $0.65
       
  Dividend yields 0.00% 0.00%

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

F-20


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 8

Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (cont’d)

  m)

Derivative Liabilities

     
 

The Company evaluates its financial instruments and other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked- to-market at each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability and the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.

     
 

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instruments that become subject to reclassification are reclassified at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

     
 

The Company uses the binomial option pricing model to value derivative liabilities. This model uses Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy established by ASC 820 Fair Value Measurement.

     
  n)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     
 

There are no new accounting pronouncements that the Company recently adopted or are pending the Company’s adoption that are expected to have a material impact on the company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.


F-21


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 9

Note 3 Equipment

            September 30, 2013        
            Accumulated        
      Cost     Depreciation     Net  
                     
  Computer equipment $  5,631   $  5,631   $  -  

            September 30, 2012        
            Accumulated        
      Cost     Depreciation     Net  
                     
  Computer equipment $  5,631   $  5,055   $  576  

Note 4 Derivative Liabilities
   

During the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 6,448,966 share purchase warrants that are required to be accounted for as liabilities pursuant to ASC 815 because the terms of the warrants contain provisions that are in violation of the fixed for fixed criteria of that guidance such that the warrant agreements provide the holder with a full ratchet down adjustment to the exercise price such that in the event the Company, during the term of the warrants, issues common stock or common stock equivalents at a price per share lower than the exercise price of the warrants, the exercise price of the warrants will be adjusted to equal the price at which the new common stock or common stock equivalents are issued.

   

At September 30, 2013, these share purchase warrants were still outstanding and were being accounted for as liabilities carried at fair value.

   

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company had derivative liabilities that consisted of embedded conversion features in the Company’s convertible promissory notes.

   

Pursuant to the guidance of ASC 815, these derivative instruments are required to be recorded as liabilities on the balance sheet measured at fair value and are marked-to-market at each balance sheet date with the change in fair value being recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as other income or expense.


F-22


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 10

Note 4 Derivative Liabilities – (cont’d)
   

A summary of the Company’s derivative liabilities for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:


      2013     2012  
               
  Balance, beginning of the period $  -   $  67,500  
  Fair value at issuance of derivative liability   919,000     -  
  Change in fair value of derivative liability   (15,000 )   (67,500 )
  Balance, end of the period $  904,000   $  -  

The convertible promissory notes containing embedded conversion features that were required to be separately accounted for as derivative liabilities matured during the year ended September 30, 2012 and consequently, the liability was extinguished as at September 30, 2012.

F-23


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 11

Note 5 Promissory Notes Payable

      September 30,  
      2013     2012  
  Promissory note dated June 6, 2012 bearing interest at 8% per annum, due on demand $  -   $  49,000  
               
  Promissory note dated June 26, 2012 bearing interest at 8% per annum, due on demand   -     250,000  
               
  Promissory note dated December 31, 2012 bearing interest at 12% per annum, due on December 31, 2013   100,000     -  
               
  Promissory note dated January 9, 2013 with a principal balance of $84,060 (CDN$86,677), bearing interest at 12% per annum, secured by all the present and future assets of the Company; due on demand   84,060     -  
               
  Promissory note dated January 9, 2013 with a principal balance of $26,803 (CDN$27,639), bearing interest at 12% per annum, secured by all the present and future assets of the Company; due on demand   26,803     -  
      210,863     299,000  
  Less: current portion   (210,863 )   (299,000 )
    $  -   $  -  

On June 6, 2012, the Company issued a promissory note having a principal balance of $49,000 with terms that included interest at 8% per annum and matured on December 3, 2012. On July 5, 2013, this note, along with accrued interest of $3,200, was settled in exchange for 130,501 units of the Company. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one share purchase warrant, with each warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $0.75 per share for a period of five years from the date of issuance. In connection with the issuance of this note, the Company paid a finder’s fee totaling $4,900 which was deferred and amortized to income using the effective interest method over the terms of the note. As at September 30, 2013, there remained an unamortized balance of $Nil (September 30, 2012: $1,215) in respect of this deferred financing charge.

On June 26, 2012, the Company issued a promissory note having a principal balance of $250,000 with terms that included interest at 8% per annum and matured on March 31, 2013. On July 5, 2013, this note, along with accrued interest of $15,233, was settled in exchange for 663,082 units of the Company. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one share purchase warrant, with each warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $0.75 per share for a period of five years from the date of issuance.

F-24


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 12

Note 5 Promissory Notes Payable – (cont’d)
   

On October 17, 2012, the Company issued a promissory note having a principal balance of $150,000 with terms that included interest at 8% per annum and matured on March 31, 2013. On July 5, 2013, this note, along with accrued interest of $5,425 was settled in exchange for 388,562 units of the Company. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one share purchase warrant, with each warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $0.75 per share for a period of five years from the date of issuance.

   

On November 14, 2012, the Company issued a promissory note having a principal balance of $50,000 with terms that included interest at 8% per annum and matured on March 31, 2013. On July 5, 2013, this note, along with accrued interest of $1,501 was settled in exchange for 128,753 units of the Company. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one share purchase warrant, with each warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $0.75 per share for a period of five years from the date of issuance.

   

On December 31, 2012, the Company issued a promissory note having a principal balance of $100,000 with terms that included interest at 12% per annum and matured on June 30, 2013, in exchange for an accounts payable owing in respect of unpaid consulting fees. This note was not repaid on June 30, 2013 and the maturity date has been extended to December 31, 2013.

   

On February 8, 2013, the Company issued a promissory note having a principal balance of $50,000 with terms that included interest at 10% per annum and matured on June 8, 2013. On July 5, 2013, this note, along with accrued interest of $699 was settled in exchange for 126,747 units of the Company. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one share purchase warrant, with each warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $0.75 per share for a period of five years from the date of issuance.


F-25


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 13

Note 5 Promissory Notes Payable – (cont’d)
   
  On January 9, 2013, the Company issued two promissory notes (the “Secured Notes”);

  a)

The Company issued a promissory note in the amount of $87,865 (CDN$86,677) to the former President, Secretary, Treasurer, CFO and director of the Company (the “President”) in exchange for unpaid consulting fees owing to the President. The note is bearing interest at 12% per annum and was due June 30, 2013.

     
  b)

The Company issued a promissory note in the amount of $28,017 (CDN$27,639) to a former director of the Company (the “Director”) in exchange for unpaid consulting fees owing to the Director. The note is bearing interest at 12% per annum and was due June 30, 2013.

The Secured Notes are secured by a right to delay the transfer of any or all of the Company’s assets until the obligations of the Secured Notes are satisfied, including a restriction on the transfer of cash by the Company and a security interest over the intellectual property of the Company. The security interests of the Secured Notes is ranked senior to any and all security interests granted prior to the issuance of the notes and to all subsequent security interests granted, unless the holders agree in writing to other terms.

In addition, if the promissory notes are not repaid within 10 days of their maturity dates, they shall bear late fees in addition to interest accruing, at a rate of $100 per day per note.

In an event of default by the Company under the terms of the promissory notes, the notes shall bear additional late fees of $500 per day per note.

Subsequent to the issuance of these promissory notes, the President resigned as President, Secretary, Treasurer, CFO and director of the Company and the Director resigned as director of the Company.

The Company did not repay the notes on June 30, 2013. The Company has disputed the issuance of the Secured Notes and should there be an attempt to enforce the Secured Notes or collection on them, the Company will consider a legal remedy. The Company had not accrued any late fees in connection with these promissory notes as at September 30, 2013 as the Company does not consider these amounts to be legally enforceable.

F-26


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 14

Note 5 Promissory Notes Payable – (cont’d)
   
  Extinguishment of promissory notes payable and accounts payable
   

On July 5, 2013, the Company issued equity units in settlement of certain of its promissory notes and trade accounts payable. Each unit consisted of one common share and common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $0.75 until July 5, 2018.

   
  The promissory note and accounts payable settlements are summarized as follows:

Amount Settled     Units issued        
            Accrued                 Loss on  
             Date of Note     Principal     Interest     Number     Fair Value     Settlement  
Promissory notes payable                                
June 6, 2012     49,000     3,200     130,501     98,205     46,005  
June 26, 2012     250,000     15,233     663,082     498,972     233,739  
October 17, 2012     150,000     5,425     388,562     292,394     136,969  
November 14, 2012     50,000     1,501     128,753     96,887     45,386  
February 8, 2013     50,000     699     126,747     95,377     44,678  
      549,000     26,058     1,437,645     1,081,835   $  506,777  
                                 
Accounts payable     1,108,506     -     2,771,265     2,085,386     976,880  
                                 
    $  1,657,506   $  26,058     4,208,910   $  3,167,221   $  1,483,657  

The fair value of each unit issued was determined to be $0.753 determined by aggregating (i) the fair value of $0.61 for the Company’s common shares based on their quoted market price on the date of settlement and (ii) the fair value of $0.143 for each warrant included in the Company’s units. The fair value of the Company’s warrants was determined using the binomial option pricing model with the following assumptions:

Stock price $0.61
Exercise price $0.75
Expected volatility 81.57%
Risk-free discount rate 0.28%
Expected term 1.49 years
Expected dividend yield 0.00%

The loss on settlement of debt was reduced by an amount of $11,449 relating to the interest that accrued on the promissory notes that was forgiven upon settlement of the notes payable in exchange for shares.

F-27


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 15

Note 6

Capital Stock

 

 

On May 24, 2006, the board of directors approved a six (6) for one (1) forward split of the authorized issued and outstanding common stock. The Company’s authorized capital increased from 25,000,000 shares of common stock to 150,000,000 shares of common stock.

 

 

On September 24, 2007, the Company issued 222,222 common shares at $3.60 per share for a total of $800,000 for research and development expenses. The common shares were recorded based upon the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the agreement date.

 

 

On September 25, 2007, the Company settled a loan payable in the amount of $333,000 by issuing 92,500 common shares at $3.60 per share, being the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the settlement date.

 

 

On December 10, 2007, the Company issued 150,000 units at $3.50 per unit for proceeds of $525,000. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $5.00 per share until December 10, 2009.

 

 

On December 18, 2007, the Company issued 10,000 shares at $4.50 per share for a total of $45,000 pursuant to an agreement to settle a debt and issued 50,000 shares at $3.86 per share for a total of $193,000 pursuant to a consulting agreement. The Company recorded compensation expense of $65,000 in respect of these issuances based on the excess of the fair value of these shares over the balances at which they were recorded by the Company.

 

 

On May 15, 2008, the Company issued 65,000 common shares at $5.24 per share for a total of $340,600 to its former CEO in accordance with the terms of a severance agreement upon the termination of his services. The common shares were recorded based upon the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the agreement date.

 

 

On August 19, 2008, the Company issued 25,000 common shares at $5.07 per share for a total of $ 126,750 to a director of the Company pursuant to an agreement to provide consulting services. The common shares were recorded based upon the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the agreement date.

 

 

On August 19, 2008, the Company issued 142,698 units at $4.25 per unit for proceeds of $606,467 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $5.00 per share until August 19, 2009.

 

 

On November 20, 2008, the Company issued 25,000 common shares at $2.63 per share for a total of $65,750 to a director of the Company pursuant to an agreement to provide consulting services. The common shares were recorded based upon the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the issuance date.

 

 

On February 20, 2009, the Company issued 25,000 common shares at $2.50 per share for a total of $62,500 to a director of the Company pursuant to an agreement to provide consulting services. The common shares were recorded based upon the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the issuance date.


F-28


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 16

Note 6 Capital Stock – (cont’d)
   

On March 6, 2009, the Company issued 89,148 units at $2.25 per unit for proceeds of $200,583 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $4.00 per share until March 6, 2010.

 

 

On March 20, 2009, the Company issued 10,800 units at $2.25 per unit for proceeds of $24,300 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $4.00 per share until March 20, 2010.

 

 

On March 20, 2009, the Company issued 2,500 common shares at $2.00 per share for a total of $5,000 to a public relations consultant pursuant to an agreement to provide consulting services. The common shares were recorded based upon the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the issuance date.

 

 

On May 14, 2009, the Company entered into a revised consulting agreement with a director whereby the consultant returned 75,000 common shares to the Company for cancellation. The return of shares was recorded in the same amount at which they were originally issued. On June 11, 2009 the Company issued 36,000 units at $2.25 per unit for proceeds of $81,000 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $4.00 per share until June 11, 2010. The Company paid finders’ fees in the amount of $8,100 in relation to this private placement.

 

 

On June 11, 2009 the Company issued 29,227 common shares at $2.25 per share for service rendered by consultants. The common shares were recorded based upon the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the issuance date of the shares.

 

 

On June 19, 2009, the Company issued 495,556 units at $2.25 per unit for total proceeds of $1,115,000 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one and one-half of a common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $2.25 per share until June 19, 2011.

 

 

On June 26, 2009, the Company issued 22,222 common shares at $2.51 per share for finder’s fees related to the issuance of a $500,000 note payable. The common shares were recorded based upon the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the issue date.

 

 

On August 19, 2009, the Company issued 128,888 units at $2.25 per unit for total proceeds of $289,998. Of these placements, 40,000 units consisted of one common share and one share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $4.00 per share until July 9, 2010 and 88,888 Units consisted of one common share and one and one- eighth share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common shares at $2.25 per share until August 4, 2011. The Company paid finders’ fees totalling $19,000 in respect of these private placements.


F-29


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 17

Note 6 Capital Stock – (cont’d)
   

On October 2, 2009 the Company issued 266,666 units at $2.25 per unit for proceeds of $600,000 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one and one-eighth common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common shares at $2.25 per share until October 2, 2011. The Company had received $300,000 of this amount in the year ended September 30, 2010.

   

On February 2, 2010 the Company issued 49,505 common shares of the Company, at their fair value of $2.02 per share pursuant to an agreement with a former officer to settle an outstanding amount owed.

 

 

On April 9, 2010, the Company issued 92,499 units at $2.60 per unit for proceeds of $240,498 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $3.50 per share until April 9, 2011.

 

 

On April 30, 2010, the Company issued 9,825 common shares of the Company, at $2.85 per share as consideration for terminating a consulting agreement and for services rendered under the agreement. The common shares were recorded based upon the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the termination of the agreement.

 

 

On June 29, 2010, the Company issued 941,000 units at $2.50 per unit for total proceeds of $2,352,500 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half of a common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $3.50 per share until December 29, 2011.

 

 

On July 5, 2010, the Company issued 400,000 units in settlement of $1,000,000 owing to a creditor. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at 3.50 per share until January 5, 2012. The fair value of the units issued was determined to be $1,444,000 on the date they were issued and thus the Company recorded a loss on settlement of accounts payable of $444,000 with a corresponding credit to additional paid-in capital of the same amount on date of issuance. The fair value of the shares included in the units was determined with reference to their quoted market price and the value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: exercise price - $3.50, stock price - $3.15, expected volatility – 68.45%, expected life – 1.5 years, dividend yield – 0.00%.

 

 

On September 3, 2010, the Company issued 163,000 units at $2.75 per unit for proceeds of $448,250 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $3.75 per share until March 3, 2012.

 

 

On September 3, 2010, the Company issued 9,000 units at $2.75 per unit for finder’s fees related to the private placement of the same date. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $3.75 per share until March 3, 2012.


F-30


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 18

Note 6

Capital Stock – (cont’d)

 

 

On September 30, 2010, the Company issued 510,638 common shares at $2.35 per share pursuant to the terms of a convertible note payable.

 

 

On September 30, 2010, the Company issued 82,310 units at $2.25 per unit pursuant to the terms of convertible notes payable. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $3.50 per share until September 30, 2011.

 

 

On September 30, 2010, the Company issued 245,748 units at $2.25 per unit pursuant to the terms of convertible notes payable. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $3.00 per share until September 30, 2012.

 

 

On November 18, 2010, the Company issued 393,846 units at $2.75 per unit for proceeds of $1,083,075 pursuant to a private placement agreement. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $4.50 per share until May 18, 2012. The Company paid a finder’s fee totalling $65,363 in respect of this private placement.

   

On November 18, 2010, the Company issued 3,636 units at $2.75 per unit for finder’s fees related to the private placement of the same date. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $4.50 per share until May 18, 2012.

   

On November 18, 2010, the Company issued 853,075 units in the conversion of two notes payable originally convertible at $2.50. The Company recorded debt conversion expense of $504,160, related to the fair value of the additional units issued as a result of converting at the lower conversion price. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $3.00 per share until November 18, 2012. The fair value of the shares included in the units was determined with reference to their quoted market price and the value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: exercise price - $3.00, stock price - $4.12, expected volatility – 78.33%, expected life – 2.0 years, dividend yield – 0.00%, risk-free rate – 0.52%.

 

 

On November 18, 2010, the Company issued 145,063 shares of common stock at their fair value of $4.12 per share based on their quoted market price pursuant to settling non- convertible interest bearing notes payable outstanding in the amount of $398,922, including accrued interest of $26,032. The Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $198,738 based on the difference between the carrying value of the debt settled and the fair value of the shares issued.

 

 

On November 18, 2010, the Company issued 181,818 shares of common stock at their fair value of $4.12 per share based on the quoted value of units issued in a private placement on the same date to one creditor in settlement of $500,000 of debt owing. The Company recorded a loss on settlement of accounts payable of $249,090 based on the difference of the carrying value of the account payable and the fair value of the shares issued.


F-31


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 19

Note 6 Capital Stock – (cont’d)
 

 

On November 25, 2010, the Company issued 29,851 units at $3.35 per unit for proceeds of $100,000 pursuant to a private placement agreement. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $4.50 per share until November 25, 2012.

 

 

On November 25, 2010, the Company issued 2,985 units at $3.35 per unit for finder’s fees related to the private placement of the same date. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $4.50 per share until November 25, 2012.

 

 

On February 1, 2011, the Company issued 61,014 units at $3.75 per unit for proceeds of $228,800 pursuant to a private placement agreement. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $5.25 per share until August 1, 2012.

   

On May 3, 2011, the Company issued 33,334 units at $3.00 per unit for proceeds of $100,000 pursuant to a private placement agreement. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $4.00 per share until April 20, 2013.

 

 

On June 19, 2011, the Company issued 700,000 common shares at $2.25 per share for proceeds of $1,575,000 pursuant to the exercise of warrants.

 

 

On September 26, 2011, the Company issued 650,000 units in settlement of $975,000 of debt owing. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $2.00 per share until September 26, 2012. The Company recorded a loss on settlement of accounts payable in the amount of $84,963 based on the fair value of shares being $975,000 at their issuance and the fair value of the warrants determined to be $84,963. The fair value of the shares included in the units was determined with reference to their quoted market price and the value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: exercise price - $2.00, stock price - $1.50, expected volatility – 69%, expected life – 1.0 years, dividend yield – 0.00%, risk-free interest rate – 0.10%.

 

 

On December 6, 2011, the Company issued 615,600 units at $1.25 per unit for proceeds of $769,500 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $2.00 per share until December 6, 2012. The Company paid finder’s fees of $77,000 in connection with this private placement.


F-32


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 20

Note 6 Capital Stock – (cont’d)
   

On February 9, 2012 the Company issued 8,000 units for service rendered by a director and officer of the Company. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $2.00 per share until February 9, 2013. The fair value of the units issued was determined to be $15,896 on the date they were issued and the Company recorded consulting fees of $15,896 on the statement of operations for the year ended September 30, 2012. The fair value of the shares included in the units was determined with reference to their quoted market price and the value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: exercise price - $2.00, stock price - $1.74, expected volatility – 84.88%, expected life – 1.0 years, risk free interest rate – 0.15%, dividend yield – 0.00%.

 

 

On February 9, 2012, the Company issued 270,000 units at $1.25 per unit for proceeds of $337,500 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $2.00 per share until February 9, 2013. The Company paid a finder’s fee of $33,750 in connection with this private placement.

 

 

On May 31, 2012, the Company issued 2,700,513 units in settlement of $1,297,889 in promissory notes and $52,367 of accrued interest on these notes, which was included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $0.75 per share until November 30, 2013.

 

 

On June 26, 2012, the Company agreed to issue 75,000 common shares to the former president of the Company for past services and in final settlement of a consulting agreement dated February 1, 2007. These shares were issued on July 12, 2012.

 

 

On July 5, 2013, the Company issued 4,208,910 units in settlement of $549,000 in promissory notes, $26,058 of accrued interest on these notes, which was included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and $1,108,506 in other accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $0.75 per share until July 5, 2018 (Note 5).

 

 

On July 5, 2013, the Company issued 2,196,133 units at $0.40 per unit for gross proceeds of $878,453 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $0.75 per share until July 5, 2018. The Company paid finder’s fees of $89,680 and issued warrants to purchase 43,923 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share until July 5, 2018 in connection with this private placement. In addition, the Company incurred share issuance costs of $16,494.


F-33


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 21

Note 6 Capital Stock – (cont’d)
   
All of the 6,448,966 warrant agreements issued on July 5, 2013 contain the following provisions:

  (i)

a full ratchet down adjustment to the exercise price such that in the event the Company, during the term of the warrants, issues common stock or common stock equivalents at a price per share lower than the exercise price of the warrants, the exercise price of the warrants will be adjusted to equal the price at which the new common stock or common stock equivalents are issued;

     
  (ii)

a put option whereby in the event of certain fundamental transactions, as defined in the warrant agreements, the Company may be required to pay the Holder an amount of cash equal to the value of the warrant as determined in accordance with the Black Scholes option pricing model, for each warrant held by the Holder; and

     
  (iii)

a contingent call provision whereby the Company may have the option to call for cancellation all of any portion of the warrants for consideration equal to $0.001 per share, provided the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $1.50 for a period of twenty consecutive trading days, subject to certain minimum volume restrictions and other restrictions as provided in the warrant agreements.


  Common stock to be issued
   

During the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company received $60,000 in share subscriptions in respect of the issuance of 120,000 units at $0.50 per unit. Each unit will consist of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $1.00 per share for a period of five years from the date of issuance.

   
Note 7

Equity Line of Credit

   

On July 5, 2013, the Company entered into a $10,000,000 purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC, (“Lincoln Park”) an Illinois limited liability company (the “Financing”) pursuant to which the Company may sell and issue to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park is obligated to purchase, up to $10,000,000 in value of its shares of common stock from time to time over a 36 month period. In connection with the Financing, the Company also entered into a registration rights agreement with Lincoln Park whereby the Company agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) covering the shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued to Lincoln Park under the Purchase Agreement.


F-34


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 22

The Company will determine, at its own discretion, the timing and amount of its sales of common stock, subject to certain conditions and limitations. The purchase price of the shares that may be sold to Lincoln Park under the Purchase Agreement will be based on the market price of the Company’s shares of common stock immediately preceding the time of sale without any fixed discount, provided that in no event will such shares be sold to Lincoln Park when the closing sale price is less than $0.50 per share. There are no upper limits on the per share price that Lincoln Park may pay to purchase such common stock. The purchase price will be equitably adjusted for any reorganization, recapitalization, non-cash dividend, stock split or similar transaction occurring during the business days used to compute such price.

   

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Lincoln Park initially purchased 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $100,000. In consideration for entering into the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to Lincoln Park 341,858 shares of common stock as a commitment fee and shall issue up to 133,409 shares pro rata, when and if, Lincoln Park purchases at the Company’s discretion the remaining $10,000,000 aggregate commitment. The Purchase Agreement may be terminated by the Company at any time at its discretion without any cost to the Company.

   
 

On October 23, 2013, the registration statement was declared effective by the SEC.

   

The Company incurred $71,335 in direct expenses in connection with the Purchase Agreement and registration statement. These were recorded as share issuance costs as a charge against additional paid in capital during the year ended September 30, 2013.

   
Note 8

Related Party Transactions

 

 

 

The following amounts have been donated to the Company by the directors:


                  January 23, 2004  
      Year ended September 30,     (Date of Inception)  
      2013     2012     to September 30, 2013    
                     
  Management fees $  -   $ -   $ 14,625  
  Rent   -     -     3,750  
  Debt forgiven by directors   -     -     33,666  
    $  -   $ -   $ 52,041  

During the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company was charged consulting fees totaling $81,072 (2012: $479,434) by directors, officers and a significant shareholder of the Company. As at September 30, 2013, included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is $30,447 (2012: $127,452) owing to directors and officers of the Company and a former director and officer of the Company.

F-35


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 23

On July 5, 2013, pursuant to an employment agreement with the newly appointed President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer, and Director, of the Company, the Company:

  i)

granted 2,000,000 fully vested share purchase options exercisable at $0.40 per share until July 5, 2023. The Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $1,002,500 (2012: $Nil) during the year ended September 30, 2013 in connection with these options.

     
  ii)

issued 4,000,000 shares of restricted common stock that vest as follows:


  25% upon the Company starting a Phase Ib/IIb human study
  25% upon the Company in-licensing additional assets in clinical or pre-clinical stage

25% upon the Company securing additional non-dilutive equity funding in 2013 of at least $5,000,000 with a share price higher than the previous funding.

  25% upon the Company obtaining a listing on a major stock exchange.

No stock-based compensation has been recorded in connection with the issuance of these shares in the financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2013 as none of the performance conditions have yet been met.

F-36


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 24

Note 9 Commitments

  a)

Share Purchase Warrants

     
 

A summary of the Company’s share purchase warrants outstanding is presented below:


          Weighted  
          Average  
          Exercise  
    Number of Shares     Price  
             
Balance, September 30, 2011   2,655,479   $  3.16  
Expired   (1,552,651 ) $  3.16  
Issued   3,147,313   $  0.93  
Balance, September 30, 2012   4,250,141   $  1.16  
Expired   (1,549,628 ) $  2.56  
Issued   6,448,966   $  0.75  
Balance, September 30, 2013   9,149,479   $  0.75  

At September 30, 2013, the Company has 9,149,479 currently exercisable share purchase warrants outstanding as follows:

  Number     Exercise Price     Expiry Date  
  2,700,513   $  0.75     November 30, 2013  
  6,448,966   $  0.75     July 5, 2018  
  9,149,479              

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the exercise price and expiry of 200,000 warrants exercisable at $3.50 and expiring January 5, 2012 were modified and extended such that these warrants were exercisable at $1.50 until January 5, 2013. The fair value of this modification was determined to be $80,200 and was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate: 0.11%, expected life: 1.0 year, annualized volatility: 79.46%, dividend rate: 0%.

F-37


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 25

Note 9 Commitments – (cont’d)

  b)

Stock–based Compensation Plan

     
 

In April, 2007, the Company adopted a stock option plan which provides for the granting of stock options to selected directors, officers, employees or consultants in an aggregate amount of up to 3,000,000 common shares of the Company and, in any case, the number of shares to be issued to any one individual pursuant to the exercise of options shall not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding share capital. The granting of stock options, exercise prices and terms are determined by the Company's Board of Directors. If no vesting schedule is specified by the Board of Directors on the grant of options, then the options shall vest over a 4-year period with 25% of the options granted vesting each year commencing 1 year from the grant date. For stockholders who have greater than 10% of the outstanding common shares of the Company and who have granted options, the exercise price of their options shall not be less than 110% of the fair of the stock on grant date. Otherwise, options granted shall have an exercise price equal to their fair value on grant date.

     
 

On February 2, 2011, the Company amended and restated the 2007 stock option plan to increase the number of options authorized to 4,000,000.

     
 

A summary of the status of Company’s outstanding stock purchase options for the year ended September 30, 2013 is presented below:


            Weighted     Weighted  
      Number of     Average     Average Grant  
      Shares     Exercise Price     Date fair value  
  Outstanding at September 30, 2011   2,375,000   $  3.18        
  Forfeited   (1,100,000 ) $  2.82        
  Granted   500,000   $  1.50   $  0.72  
  Outstanding at September 30, 2012   1,775,000   $  2.94        
  Expired   (550,000 ) $  3.86        
  Forfeited   (150,000 ) $  3.72        
  Granted   2,000,000   $  0.40   $  0.50  
  Outstanding at September 30, 2013   3,075,000   $  1.26        
  Exercisable at September 30, 2013   2,305,000   $  0.79        
  Exercisable at September 30, 2012   905,000   $ 2.81        

F-38


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 26

Note 9 Commitments – (cont’d)

  b)

Stock–based Compensation Plan – (cont’d)

     
 

At September 30, 2013, the following stock options were outstanding:


Number of Shares                 Aggregate     Remaining  
    Number     Exercise           Intrinsic     Contractual  
Total   Vested     Price     Expiry Date     Value     Life (yrs)  
150,000 (1)   150,000   $  3.10     June 30, 2014     -     0.75  
500,000 (2)   -   $  2.50     October 19, 2013     -     0.05  
5,000 (3)   5,000   $  2.50     March 2, 2014     -     0.42  
50,000 (4)   50,000   $  3.50     June 30, 2014     -     0.75  
100,000 (5)   100,000   $  3.67     March 30, 2016     -     2.50  
270,000 (6)   -   $  3.00     February 8, 2017     -     3.36  
2,000,000 (7)   2,000,000   $  0.40     July 5, 2023     500,000     9.77  
3,075,000        2,305,000                 500,000        

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted market price of the Company’s stock for the options that were in-the-money at September 30, 2013.

  (1)

As at September 30, 2013 and 2012, these options had fully vested. During the year ended September 30, 2012, the expiry of these options was extended from June 3, 2013 to June 30, 2014. The fair value of this modification was determined to be $18,600 and was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate: 0.31%, expected life: 2.0 years, annualized volatility: 84.74%, dividend rate: 0%. The Company did not recognize any stock-based compensation for these options during the year ended September 30, 2013 (2012: $18,600).

     
  (2)

As at September 30, 2013 and 2012, none of these options have vested. The options vest as to 100,000 per compound entered into a phase II trial. The fair value of these options was calculated to be $740,000, which the Company has not yet recognized in the financial statements as the performance conditions have not yet been met.

     
  (3)

As at September 30, 2013 and 2012, these options had fully vested. The Company did not recognize any stock-based compensation for these options during the year ended September 30, 2013 (2012: $nil).


F-39


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 27

Note 9 Commitments – (cont’d)

  b)

Stock–based Compensation Plan – (cont’d)


  (4)

As at September 30, 2013 and 2012, these options had fully vested. The Company did not recognize any stock-based compensation during the year ended September 30, 2013 (2012: $nil). During the year ended September 30, 2012, the expiry of these options was shortened from June 29, 2015 to June 30, 2014. The Company did not recognize any stock based compensation expense in connection with this modification because the fair value of the modified options was less than the fair value of the options under the old terms.

     
  (5)

As at September 30, 2013 and 2012, these options had fully vested. The fair value of these options at issuance was calculated to be $267,000. The Company did not recognize any stock-based compensation during the year ended September 30, 2013 (2012: $6,500).

     
  (6)

As at September 30, 2013 and 2012, these options had not vested. The options vest upon one or more compounds: entering Phase II trial – 90,000 options; entering Phase III trial – 90,000 options; and receiving FDA approval – 90,000 options. No stock-based compensation has been recorded in the financial statements as none of the performance conditions have yet been met.

     
  (7)

As at September 30, 2013 these options had fully vested (2012: None of these options had vested). These options were granted during the year ended September 30, 2013 and vested immediately upon granting. The Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $1,002,500 (2012: $Nil) during the year ended September 30, 2013 in connection with these options.

During the year ended September 30, 2013, 150,000 options were forfeited for which the Company had recognized stock-based compensation of $Nil (2012: $163,415) during the year ended September 30, 2013.

During the year ended September 30, 2012, 1,100,000 options were forfeited for which the Company had recognized stock-based compensation of $33,493 during the year ended September 30, 2012.

The fair value of stock options granted has been determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions applied to stock options granted during the periods:

  2013 2012
Risk-free interest rate 2.73% 0.83% - 2.19%
Expected life of options 10.0 years 4.25 - 5.0 years
Annualized volatility 71.39% 57.87% - 95.25%
Dividend rate 0.00% 0.00%

F-40


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 28

Note 9 Commitments – (cont’d)

  b)

Stock–based Compensation Plan – (cont’d)

     
 

At September 30, 2013, the following summarizes the unvested stock options:


            Weighted     Weighted  
            Average     Average  
      Number of     Exercise     Grant-Date  
      Shares     Price     Fair Value  
  Unvested options at September 30, 2011   1,445,000   $  3.33   $  2.17  
  Granted   500,000   $  1.50   $  0.72  
  Forfeited   (900,000 ) $  2.74   $  1.60  
  Vested   (175,000 ) $  3.71   $  2.70  
  Unvested options at September 30, 2012   870,000   $  2.81   $  1.82  
  Granted   2,000,000   $  0.40   $  0.50  
  Expired   (100,000 ) $  3.86   $  2.49  
  Vested   (2,000,000 ) $  0.40   $  0.50  
  Unvested options at September 30, 2013   770,000   $  2.68   $  1.74  

As at September 30, 2013, there was no unrecognized compensation cost associated with unvested share-based compensation awards that will become vested exclusive of achieving any performance milestones that is expected to be recognized in the current fiscal year. There has been no stock-based compensation recognized in the financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2013 (2012: $nil) for options that will vest upon the achievement of performance milestones because the Company has determined that satisfaction of the performance milestones was not probable. Compensation relating to stock options exercisable upon achieving performance milestones will be recognized in the period the milestones are achieved.

Stock-based compensation amounts, including those relating to shares issued for services during the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, are classified in the Company’s Statement of Operations as follows:

    2013     2012  
Consulting fees $  -   $  312,903  
Research and development   -     80,200  
Salaries and wages   1,002,500     -  
  $  1,002,500   $  393,103  

F-41


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 29

Note 10 Income Taxes
   

The tax effects of the temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:


      2013     2012  
  Tax rate   34%     34%  
               
  Net operating loss carryforwards $  7,141,000   $  6,775,000  
  Research and development tax credits   705,000     741,000  
  Foreign exchange   (19,000 )   28,000  
  Accrued bonuses   34,000     34,000  
  Intangible asset costs   51,000     34,000  
  Stock-based compensation   633,000     -  
  Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets   (8,545,000 )   (7,612,000 )
               
  Net deferred tax assets $  -   $  -  

The provision for income taxes differ from the amount established using the statutory income tax rate as follows:

      2013     2012  
               
  Income benefit at statutory rate $  (1,258,000 ) $  (2,823,000 )
  Foreign income taxed at foreign statutory rate   -     (2,000 )
  Debt extinguishment   501,000     1,302,000  
  Research and development tax credit   (17,000 )   (175,000 )
  Fair value of derivative liability   7,000     (23,000 )
  Debt accretion   -     33,000  
  Other permanent differences   (5,000 )   113,000  
  Adjustment to prior years' tax provision   (161,000 )   -  
  Change in valuation allowance   933,000     1,575,000  
               
  Income Tax Expense $  -   $  -  

As of September 30, 2013, the Company had net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $21,022,000 (2012: $20,196,000) available to offset future taxable income. The carry-forwards will begin to expire in 2027 unless utilized in earlier years. The Company has not yet filed any tax returns in France as they are not yet due.

F-42


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 30

Note 10 Income Taxes – (cont’d)
   

The Company evaluates its valuation allowance requirements based on projected future operations. When circumstances change and this causes a change in management’s judgment about the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the impact of the change on the valuation allowance is reflected in current income. Because management of the Company does not currently believe that it is more likely than not that the Company will receive the benefit of these assets, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has been established at both September 30, 2013 and 2012.

   
 

Uncertain Tax Positions

   

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s tax returns are subject to tax examinations by U.S. federal and state tax authorities, or examinations by foreign tax authorities until respective statute of limitation. The Company is subject to tax examinations by tax authorities for all taxation years commencing on or after 2005.

   
Note 11

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

   

Investing and financing activities that do not have a direct impact on current cash flows are excluded from the statement of cash flows.

   
 

During the year ended September 30, 2013;


  a)

The Company issued three promissory notes in the principal amounts of $100,000, $87,865 (CDN$86,677) and $28,017 (CDN$27,639) in exchange for accounts payable owing to three vendors in respect of unpaid consulting fees.

     
  b)

The Company issued 4,208,910 units of the Company at their fair value of $1.02 per unit to settle (i) interest bearing notes payable outstanding in the amount of $549,000; (ii) accrued interest in connection with the notes payable of $26,058 included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities; and (iii) accounts payable of $1,108,506. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional common share for $0.75 per share until July 5, 2018. In addition, in connection with the settlement, $11,449 of accrued interest with respect to the notes payable was forgiven. The Company recorded a loss on debt settlement of $1,472,208 as a result of this transaction.


F-43


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012 – Page 31

Note 11 Supplemental Cash Flow Information – (cont’d)
   
  During the year ended September 30, 2012:

  a)

The Company issued 544,667 units of the Company at their fair value of $1.918 per unit to settle a convertible interest bearing note payable outstanding in the amount of $272,333, including accrued interest of $22,333 included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and 2,155,846 units of the Company at their fair value of $1.918 per unit to settle non- convertible interest bearing notes payable outstanding in the amount of $1,077,923 including accrued interest of $30,034 included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional common share for $0.75 per share until November 30, 2013. The Company recorded a loss on debt settlement of $3,829,333 as a result of this transaction.

     
  b)

The Company issued 75,000 common shares at their fair value of $1.00 per share for a total of $75,000 to the former President of the Company pursuant to a severance agreement.


F-44


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL MATTERS

On November 12, 2013, the board of directors, approved the dismissal of BDO Canada LLC (“BDO Canada”) as the company's independent registered public accounting firm, effective November 12, 2013

No report prepared by BDO Canada included in our financial statements for the past two fiscal years, as well as the subsequent interim periods through the November 12, 2013, contained an adverse opinion, disclaimers of opinion or was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, and included explanatory paragraphs.

During the two most recent fiscal years, as well as the subsequent interim period through November 12, 2013, there have been no disagreements (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) between us and BDO Canada on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosures, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of BDO Canada, would have caused it to make reference to the subject of such disagreements in connection with any report prepared by BDO Canada. Further, there have been no reportable events (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

On November 12, 2013, the Board approved the engagement of BDO USA, LLC (“BDO USA”) as the company's independent registered public accounting firm to perform independent audit services. Neither the company, nor anyone on its behalf, has consulted BDO USA regarding the application of accounting principles related to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements or as to any disagreement or reportable event as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) and Item 304(a)(1)(v), respectively, of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on its evaluation, our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. The ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures was due to internal control deficiencies related to internal control over financial reporting.

30


Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2013.

Based on its evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of September 30, 2013. The ineffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting was due to the existence of significant deficiencies constituting material weaknesses, as described in greater detail below. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Material Weaknesses Identified

(1) Control environment - We did not maintain an effective control environment. The control environment, which is the responsibility of senior management, sets the tone of the organization, influences the control consciousness of its people, and is the foundation for all other components of internal control over financial reporting. Each of the following control environment material weaknesses also contributed to the material weaknesses discussed in items (2) and (3) below. Our control environment was ineffective because of the following material weaknesses:

  (a)

We did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) commensurate with our financial reporting requirements and business environment. This material weakness resulted in a material post closing adjustment which has been reflected in the financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2013. This adjustment caused changes in current liabilities, stockholders' equity, and expenses, which were not originally recorded in accordance with ASC Topic 815 Derivatives and Hedging.

     
  (b)

There was insufficient segregation of duties in our finance and accounting functions due to limited personnel. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, we had limited staff that performed nearly all aspects of our financial reporting process, including, but not limited to, access to the underlying accounting records and systems, the ability to post and record journal entries and responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements. This creates certain incompatible duties and a lack of review over the financial reporting process that would likely result in a failure to detect errors in spreadsheets, calculations, or assumptions used to compile the financial statements and related disclosures as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These control deficiencies could result in a material misstatement to our interim or annual financial statements that would not be prevented or detected; and


31


(2) Monitoring of internal control over financial reporting—We did not maintain effective monitoring controls to determine the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting and related policies and procedures because of the following material weaknesses:

  (a)

Our policies and procedures with respect to the review, supervision and monitoring of our accounting operations throughout the organization were either not designed and in place or not operating effectively.

     
  (b)

We did not maintain an effective internal control monitoring function. Specifically, there were insufficient policies and procedures to effectively determine the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting and to monitoring the ongoing effectiveness thereof.

(3) Equity Transactions—We did not establish and maintain effective controls to ensure the correct application of GAAP related to equity transactions. Specifically, we did not adequately review private placement agreements to identify potential derivative instruments.

Plan for Remediation of Material Weaknesses

We intend to take appropriate and reasonable steps to make improvements to remediate these deficiencies. We intend to consider the results of our remediation efforts and related testing as part of our year-end 2014 assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in light of our strategic plan.

Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties has not always been possible and may not be economically feasible. However, we are in the process of implementing processes and procedures intended to mitigate any material weaknesses identified.

We believe that the foregoing steps will remediate the deficiencies identified above, and we intend to continue to monitor the effectiveness of these steps and make any changes that our management deems appropriate.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additional controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

32


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

On July 5, 2013 we appointed Christopher Missling as our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to his appointment, these roles and related internal control functions were temporarily vacant as a result of the resignation of our former principal executive officers during the second fiscal quarter.

ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION

None.

33


PART III

ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

Our directors are to be elected at our annual meeting and each director elected is to hold office until his or her successor is elected and qualified. Our board of directors may remove our officers at any time.

Our directors and executive officers, their age, positions held, and duration of such, are as follows:

Name Position Age Date first appointed
Christopher Missling,
PhD


Director, President,
Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary,
Treasurer
47



July 5, 2013



Athanasios Skarpelos Director 46 January 9, 2013

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of directors and executive officers during at least the past five years, indicating their principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which they were employed.

Christopher Missling, PhD. Christopher Missling has over twenty (20) years of healthcare industry experience in big pharmaceutical, biotech industry and investment banking. Most recently, from March, 2007 until his appointment by our company, Mr. Missling served as the head of healthcare investment banking at Brimberg & Co. in New York, New York. Also, Mr. Missling served as the Chief Financial Officer of Curis, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRIS) and ImmunoGen, Inc. (NASDAQ:IMGN). Mr. Missling earned his MS and PhD from the University of Munich and an MBA from Northwestern University Kellogg School of Management.

Athanasios Skarpelos. Athanasios (Tom) Skarpelos is a self-employed investor with 17 years of experience working with private and public companies. For the past 10 years, he has been focused on biotechnology companies involved in drug discovery and drug development projects. Mr. Skarpelos was engaged as a consultant to our company for one year effective August 2, 2010. His experience has led to relationships with researchers at academic institutes in Europe and North America. Mr. Skarpelos is a founder of Anavex.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any director or executive officer.

34


Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

There are no material proceedings to which any director or executive officer or any associate of any such director or officer is a party adverse to our company or has a material interest adverse to our company.

No director or executive officer has been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years:

  1.

any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

  2.

any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);

  3.

being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities;

  4.

being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

  5.

being the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of: (i) any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation; or (ii) any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease- and- desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or (iii) any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

  6.

being the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common stock and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% percent beneficial owners were complied.

35


Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. We have posted our policy on our website at www.anavex.com.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Experts

We do not have a standing audit committee at the present time. We believe that our board of directors is capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. The board of directors of our company does not believe that it is necessary to have an audit committee at this time because management believes the functions of an audit committee can be adequately performed by the board of directors.

We do not deem either of our directors as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Nominating and Compensation Committees

We do not have standing nominating or compensation committees, or committees performing similar functions. Our board of directors believes that it is not necessary to have a standing compensation committee at this time because the functions of such committee are adequately performed by our board of directors. Our board of directors has not adopted a charter for the compensation committee.

Our board of directors also is of the view that it is appropriate for us not to have a standing nominating committee because our board of directors has performed and is expected to perform adequately the functions of a nominating committee. Our board of directors has not adopted a charter for the nominating committee. There has not been any defined policy or procedure requirements for stockholders to submit recommendations or nomination for directors. Our board of directors does not believe that a defined policy with regard to the consideration of candidates recommended by stockholders is necessary at this time because we believe that, at this stage of our development, a specific nominating policy would be premature and of little assistance until our business operations are at a more advanced level. There are no specific, minimum qualifications that our board of directors believes must be met by a candidate recommended by our board of directors. There is neither a defined, nor a typical process of identifying and evaluating nominees for director.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation

The particulars of compensation paid to the following persons for the last two completed fiscal years:

  a)

our principal executive officers;

  b)

each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 who had total compensation exceeding $100,000; and


36



  c)

up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the most recently completed financial year, who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers, for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, are set out in the following summary compensation table:





Name and Principal
Position




Year



Salary
($)



Bonus
($)


Stock
Awards
($)


Option
Awards
($)
Other
Annual
Compen-
sation
($)



Total
($)
               
Christopher Missling,
PhD(1)
President, Chief
Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and
Director
2013
2012



60,000
Nil



Nil
Nil



1,600,000(5)
Nil



1,002,500
Nil



Nil
Nil



2,662,500
Nil



               
Robert Chisholm(2)
President, Chief
Financial Officer and
Director
2013
2012

24,677
96,217

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

24,677
96,217

               
Harvey Lalach (3)
Former President,
Former Chief
Operating, Former
Director
2013
2012


Nil
130,000


Nil
Nil


Nil
75,000


Nil
18,600


Nil
Nil


Nil
223,600


               
George Tidmarsh (4)
Former Executive
Director
2013
2012
Nil
42,012
Nil
Nil
Nil
15,896
Nil
33,493
Nil
Nil
Nil
91,401

  (1)

Christopher Missling was appointed as director, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer on July 5, 2013.

     
  (2)

Robert Chisholm was appointed President and Chief Financial Officer on June 26, 2012. Prior to that date, Mr. Chisholm served as a director to the company. Mr. Chisholm resigned as President and Chief Financial Officer and director on January 9, 2013. These fees are included in consulting fees in our consolidated financial statements.

     
  (3)

Harvey Lalach was appointed President and Secretary on April 25, 2006. On August 27, 2011, Mr. Lalach was appointed Chief Operating Officer and on May 13, 2011 he was appointed interim Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Lalach resigned as an officer and director of our company on June 26, 2012.

     
  (4)

George Tidmarsh was appointed as an executive director on October 12, 2011 and received consulting fees and stock option awards in his capacity as Executive Director. Mr. Tidmarsh resigned on March 17, 2012.

     
  (5)

Mr. Missling was granted 4,000,000 shares of restricted common stock that vest upon the occurrence of certain financial and clinical milestones. The value of stock awards issued to Christopher Missling is presented at the quoted market price of these shares on the date of issuance in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for the awards that are expected to vest.


37


Consulting Agreements

Robert Chisholm

Effective June 26, 2012, Robert Chisholm was appointed President and Chief Financial Officer of the company. Mr. Chisholm was remunerated at a rate of CDN$7,500 per month through a company with which he is associated. Effective January 9, 2013, Mr. Chisholm resigned from his positions as both an officer and a director and his agreement was terminated in connection therewith.

Harvey Lalach

We had a consulting agreement dated February 1, 2007 with Harvey Lalach to provide management services to our company for consideration of $7,000 per month. The contract had a two year term, and was extended for an additional two year term expiring January 31, 2011. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, we agreed to increase the compensation of Mr. Lalach to $12,500 per month. Effective February 1, 2011 we entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Lalach whereby Mr. Lalach agreed to continue to provide management services to our company in return for compensation of $12,500 per month for an additional two years.

Effective June 26, 2012 Mr. Lalach resigned his positions as both an officer and a director. Mr. Lalach continued to consult for the company until September 30, 2012 and was paid $15,000. In addition, we issued an aggregate of 75,000 shares of our common stock at a deemed value of $1.00 per share to Mr. Lalach for his past services and in final settlement of his Consulting Agreement dated February 1, 2007 and we extended the expiry date to June 30, 2014 of 200,000 stock options held by Mr. Lalach.

Dr. George Tidmarsh

Effective October 10, 2011 we entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Tidmarsh to act as our executive director for the following consideration:

  a)

a monthly consulting fee of $10,000;

  b)

500,000 Share purchase options exercisable at $1.50 per option share until October 10, 2016 (subject to certain vesting provisions);

  c)

reimbursement of all reasonable expenditures.

On February 9, 2012 we issued an aggregate of 8,000 units of our securities at a price of $1.25 per unit to George Tidmarsh, a former director of our company, for his services during the month of January, 2012. Each unit consisted of one share of our common stock and one-half of one share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant is exercisable at $2.00 for one share of common stock for a period of 12 months.

On March 18, 2012 Dr. Tidmarsh delivered notice to us of his resignation as both an officer and a director. On March 21, 2012, Dr. Tidmarsh withdrew his original notice, and issued an amended notice of resignation.

Christopher Missling

38


In connection with Mr. Missling’s appointment as Chief Executive Officer, the Company and Mr. Missling entered into an employment agreement commencing on July 5, 2013 and ending on July 5, 2016, whereby: (a) the Company shall pay to Mr. Missling an initial monthly base salary of $20,000 with Mr. Missling being eligible for bonuses and salary increases; (b) Mr. Missling received a sign-on stock option grant; (c) Mr. Missling shall receive a restricted stock grant subject to certain vesting milestones; (d) Mr. Missling shall be able to participate in the Company’s employee benefit plans; and (e) the Company agreed to indemnify Mr. Missling in connection with his provision of services to the Company.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth for each named executive officer and director certain information concerning the outstanding equity awards as of September 30, 2013.

    Option Awards         Stock Awards    













Name





Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Exercisable
Options
(#)







Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercisable
Options
(#)

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)










Option
Exercise
Price
($)



Option
Expiration
Date

Number
of
Shares of
Units of
Stock
that have
not
Vested
(#)

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
have not
Vested
($)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
that
have
not
Vested
(#)

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights that
have not
Vested
($)
                   
Christopher Missling 2,000,000 Nil Nil 0.40 July 5, 2023 4,000,000 1,600,000 Nil Nil
                   
Athanasios Skarpelos Nil Nil Nil N/A N/A Nil N/A Nil N/A
                   
Robert Chisholm Nil Nil Nil N/A N/A Nil N/A Nil N/A
                   
Sean Lowry Nil Nil Nil N/A N/A Nil N/A Nil N/A
                   
Harvey
Lalach
150,000
50,000
Nil
Nil
3.10
3.50
June 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
Nil
N/A
Nil
N/A

We have not adopted any other equity compensation plan other than our 2007 Stock Option Plan.

Compensation of Directors

39


The table below shows the compensation of our directors who were not our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013:




Name

Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)

Stock
Awards
($)

Option
Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)

All Other
Compensation
($)


Total
($)
               
Athanasios Skarpelos Nil    Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
               
Sean Lowry (1) 30,977 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil 30,977

  (1)

Sean Lowry was paid a fee for his service as chairman of the company’s audit committee.

We reimburse our directors for expenses incurred in connection with attending board meetings.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, there were no standard arrangements pursuant to which any of our directors were compensated for services provided in their capacity as directors.

We currently have no formal plan for compensating our directors for their services in their capacity as directors, although we may elect to issue stock options to such persons in the future. Directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our board of directors. Our board of directors may award special remuneration to any director undertaking any special services on our behalf other than services ordinarily required of a director.

Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide retirement or similar benefits for our directors or executive officers.

Resignation, Retirement, Other Termination, or Change in Control Arrangements

Our employment agreement with Christopher Missling, PhD contains provisions regarding our obligations to Mr. Missling upon his termination and upon a change of control. In the event of a change of control, as such term is defined in the employment agreement, all of the restricted stock granted to Mr. Missling shall vest. Depending on the nature of the termination of Mr. Missling’s services, certain of his salary, bonus and granted securities shall vest in the amounts at such time as set forth in the agreement. A copy of the employment agreement is set forth in its entirety as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 14, 2013.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

40


The following table sets forth, as of December 24, 2013, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock and by each of our current directors and our named executive officers and by our current directors and executive officers as a group. We have determined the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by such person in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose.


Title of class
Name and address of
beneficial owner
Amount and nature of
beneficial ownership

Percent of
class (1)
         
Common Stock Athanasios Skarpelos
2, Place du Port
Geneva, Switzerland CH 1204
5,225,832 Direct 14.0%
         
Common Stock


Christopher Missling
51 W 552nd Street,
7th floor
New York, NY 10019
2,000,000(2)





5.1%


         
Common Stock Directors & Executive
Officers as a group (2
persons)
7,225,832 18.4%
         
Common Stock


Euro Genet Labs S.A.
27 Marathonos Avenue
15351 Pallini
Athens, Greece
2,771,265


Direct


7.4%


         
Common Stock


The Stone Hedge Ltd.
Maritime House
Frederick Street
Nassau, Bahamas
2,306,179


Direct


6.2%



  (1)

Percentage of ownership is based on 37,237,588 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of December 24, 2013. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners of the common stock listed above, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares, subject to community property laws where applicable. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days, are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such option or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

     
  (2)

Includes 2,000,000 stock options that have vested. Does not include 4,000,000 shares of restricted common stock that vest pursuant to the achievement of certain objectives

Changes in Control

41


We are unaware of any contract or other arrangement the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Transactions with related persons

Prior to his appointment as an officer and director of the Company, Christopher Missling, PhD was employed by the Company’s financial advisor and placement agent that participated in our July, 2013 private placement. There have been no other transactions, since October 1, 2012, or currently proposed transactions, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any of the following persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

i.  

any director or executive officer of our company;

     
ii.  

any beneficial owner of shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to our outstanding shares of common stock; and

     
iii.  

any member of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings and in-laws) of any of the foregoing persons.

Compensation of Named Executive Officers and Directors

For information regarding compensation of named executive officers and directors, please see “Item 11. Executive Compensation.”

Director Independence

We deem that Christopher Missling, PhD is not independent as that term is defined by NASDAQ 5605(a)(2) because Mr. Missling serves as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer. We have also determined that Athanasios Skarpelos is not independent.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Fees Paid to Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed to our company for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firms, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

BDO USA LLP

  2013 2012
     
Audit Fees $50,000 Nil
     
Audit Related Fees Nil Nil

42



Tax Fees Nil Nil
     
All Other Fees Nil Nil
     
Total Fees $50,000 Nil

The fees included above to BDO USA, LLP during the year ended September 30, 2013 relates to an estimate of the audit fees of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements filed on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2013.

BDO Canada LLP

  2013 2012
     
Audit Fees $30,522 $78,187
     
Audit Related Fees $16,214 Nil
     
Tax Fees $6,019 $5,161
     
All Other Fees Nil Nil
     
Total Fees $52,755 $83,348

Audit Fees. Consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements, reviews of our interim financial statements included in quarterly reports, services performed in connection with regular filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other services that are normally provided by BDO Canada LLP for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit Related Fees. Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered in connection with the Company’s filing on form S-1 Registration Statement.

Tax Fees. Consist of fees billed for the preparation of corporate tax returns

Policy on Pre-Approval by Audit Committee of Services Performed by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by our board of directors before the respective services were rendered.

Our board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed or expected to be billed by BDO Canada LLP and BDO USA, LLP and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit was compatible with maintaining BDO Canada LLP and BDO USA, LLP’s independence.

43


PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Exhibit
Number


Description

(3)

Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1

Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on January 13, 2005)

3.2

Bylaws (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 28, 2007)

3.3

Articles of Merger filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on January 10, 2007 and which is effective January 25, 2007 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2007)

(4)

Instruments defining rights of security holders, including indentures

4.1

Specimen Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on January 13, 2005)

4.2

Form of Convertible Loan Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Form 8- K filed on April 3, 2009)

4.3

8% Convertible Loan Agreement dated June 3, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

4.4

8% Convertible Loan Agreement dated June 19, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2009)

(10)

 Material Contracts

10.1

Agreement between Anavex Life Sciences Corp. and Dr. Alexandre Vamvakides dated January 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2007)

10.2

Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2007)

10.3

Shares for Services and Subscription Agreement dated September 11, 2007 between our company and Eurogenet Labs S.A. (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2007)

10.4

2007 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 28, 2007)

10.5

Consulting Agreement with Cameron Durrant dated May 20, 2008 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on August 18, 2008

10.6

Form of Convertible Loan Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2009)

10.7

Consulting Agreement with Tariq Arshad dated March 2, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2009)

10.8

Consulting Agreement with Dr. Mark Smith dated January 13, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2009)


44



Exhibit
Number


Description

10.9

Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2009)

10.10

Form of Warrant Certificate (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2009)

10.11

Amended Consulting Agreement with Cameron Durrant dated May 14, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.12

CEO Consulting Agreement with Dr. Herve de Kergrohen dated June 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.13

Form of Private Placement subscription agreement dated June 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.14

Shares for Services Agreement with Andreas Eleuthariadis dated June 10, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.15

Shares for Services Agreement with Vasileios Kourafalos dated June 10, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.16

Shares for Services Agreement with George Kalkanis dated June 10, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.17

Stock Option Agreement with Alexandre Vamvakides dated June 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.19

Form of Private Placement Subscription Agreement Convertible Loan (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2009)

10.20

Form of Private Placement Subscription Agreement for Units (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2009)

10.21

Consultant Services Agreement with NAD Ltd. dated July 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2009)

10.22

Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2009)

10.23

Form of Warrant Certificate (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2009)

10.24

Stock Option Agreement with Alexander Vamvakides dated October 19, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2009)

10.25

Promissory note issued to Stonehedge Limited on January 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on March 31, 2010)

10.26

Second Amended Consulting Agreement with Dr. Cameron Durrant dated January 2, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2010)

10.27

Contract Lease Agreement with Euro Genet Labs SA dated February 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2010)

10.28

Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2010)

10.29

Form of Warrant Certificate (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2010)


45



Exhibit
Number


Description

10.30

Form of Convertible Loan Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2010)

10.31

Form of Subscription Agreement for US subscribers (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2010)

10.32

Form of Subscription Agreement for non-US subscribers (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2010)

10.33

Form of Warrant Certificate for US warrant holders (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2010)

10.34

Form of Warrant Certificate for non-US warrant holders (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2010)

10.35

Shares for Services Agreement dated July 5, 2010 with Eurogenet Labs SA (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 9, 2010)

10.36

Form of Warrant Certificate for non-US warrant holders (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 9, 2010)

10.37

Agreement for Services with Genesis Biopharma Group LLC dated August 10, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2010) (portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment)

10.38

Agreement for Services with ABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services dated August 10, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2010) (portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment)

10.39

Form of Subscription Agreement (US Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2010)

10.40

Form of Subscription Agreement (Canadian and Offshore Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2010)

10.41

Form of Warrant Certificate (US warrant holders)(incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2010)

10.42

Form of Warrant Certificate (Canadian and Offshore warrant holders) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2010)

10.43

Consulting Agreement dated August 2, 2010 with Tom Skarpelos (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2010)

10.44

Independent Contractor Agreement dated September 1, 2010 with David Tousley (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2010)

10.45

Sublease Contract with Genesis Research LLC dated September 15, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2010)

10.46

Form of Subscription Agreement (US Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010)

10.47

Form of Subscription Agreement (non-US Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010)


46



Exhibit
Number


Description

10.48

Form of Warrant Certificate (US Warrant Holders) (US Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010)

10.49

Form of Warrant Certificate (non-US Warrant Holders) (US Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010)

10.50

Shares for Service and Subscription Agreement dated November 1, 2010 with Eurogenet Labs SA (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010)

10.51

Subscription Agreement with Stonehedge Limited dated November 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010)

10.52

Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2010)

10.53

Form of Warrant Certificate Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2010)

10.54

Shares for Services Agreement Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2010)

10.55

Form of Subscription Agreement (non-US Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2011)

10.56

Form of Warrant Certificate (non-US Warrant Holders) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2011)

10.57

Termination Agreement dated February 2, 2011 with Genesis BioPharma Group, LLC (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2011)

10.58

Independent Contractor Agreement with Harvey Lalach dated February 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2011)

10.59

Independent Contractor Agreement with Dr. Angelos Stergiou dated February 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2011)

10.60

Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 8, 2011)

10.61

Form of Advisory Board Consulting Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 28, 2011)

10.62

Consulting Agreement dated March 30, 2011 with Shackleton Consulting Corp. (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2011)

10.63

Form of subscription agreement for convertible debenture (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2011)

10.64

Form of subscription agreement for convertible debenture (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2011)

10.65

Form of warrant certificate (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2011)


47



Exhibit
Number


Description

10.66

Amended Stock Option Agreement dated September 16, 2011 with Cameron Durrant (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2011)

10.67

Consulting Agreement dated effective October 10, 2011, with George Tidmarsh (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2011)

10.68

Form of subscription agreement for services (US purchaser) (incorporated by reference to our current report on Form 8-K filed on February 10, 2012)

10.69

Form of subscription agreement for units (Offshore purchasers) (incorporated by reference to our current report on Form 8-K filed on February 10, 2012)

10.70

Unsecured Promissory Note dated April 20, 2012 issued to Georgia Georgopoulou (incorporated by reference to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2012)

10.71

Form of subscription agreements for convertible debenture and promissory notes (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2012)

10.72

Promissory Note dated October 17, 2012 issued to Akira International Limited (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 31, 2012)

10.73

Promissory Note dated November 12, 2012 issued to Akira International Limited (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 31, 2012)

10.74

Form of SPA (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2013)

10.75

Form of Exchange Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8- K filed on July 8, 2013)

10.76

Form of Warrant (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2013)

10.77

Form of Registration Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2013)

10.78

Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2013, by and between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2013)

10.79

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2013, by and between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2013)

10.80

Employment Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2013, by and between the Company and Christopher Missling, PhD (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2013)

10.81*

2012 Addendum to the Contract for the Transfer of a Patent Invention and Scientific Collaboration dated January 11, 2013

10.82*

Appendix A to the 2012 Addendum to the Contract for the Transfer of a Patent Invention and Scientific Collaboration dated January 11, 2013


48



Exhibit
Number

Description
(14) Code of Ethics
14.1

Code of Conduct (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 28, 2007)

(21)

Subsidiaries

21.1

Anavex Life Sciences (France) SA, incorporated under the laws of France

(31)

Section 302 Certifications

31.1*

Section 302 Certification of Christopher Missling, PhD.

(32)

Section 906 Certifications

32.1*

Section 906 Certification of Christopher Missling, PhD.

(99)

Additional Exhibits

99.1

Insider Trading Policy Adopted August 27, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2010)

(101)

XBRL

101.INS*

XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT

101.SCH*

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA

101.CAL*

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE

101.DEF*

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE

101.LAB*

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE

101.PRE*

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE

* Filed herewith.

49


SIGNATURES

            Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: December 30, 2013 ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.

  By: /s/ Christopher Missling, PhD
  Name: Christopher Missling, PhD
  Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
Financial Officer, Principal Accounting
Officer)

            Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures   Title(s)   Date
         
/s/ Christopher Missling   Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial   December 30, 2013
Christopher Missling   Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal    
    Financial Officer, Principal Accounting    
    Officer)    
         
/s/ Athanasios Skarpelos   Director   December 30, 2013
Athanasios Skarpelos        

50