Bluerock Residential Growth REIT, Inc. - Annual Report: 2011 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______
Commission file number 333-153135
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
26-3136483 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
Heron Tower, 70 East 55th St., New York, NY (Address or principal executive offices) |
10022 (Zip Code) |
(212) 843-1601
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class None |
Name of each exchange on which registered None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer ¨ | Accelerated Filer | ¨ | |
Non-Accelerated Filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
There is no established market for the Registrant’s shares of Common Stock. The Registrant has registered an initial public offering of its shares of Common Stock pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11, which shares are being offered at $10.00 per share, with discounts available for certain categories of purchasers. The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2011 (the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $7.45 million assuming a market value of $10.00 per share.
As of March 2, 2012 the Registrant had 1,255,347 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
FORM 10-K
December 31, 2011
PART I | ||
Item 1. | Business | 5 |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 8 |
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 8 |
Item 2. | Properties | 8 |
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 9 |
Item 4. | (Removed and Reserved) | 9 |
PART II | ||
Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 10 |
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | 13 |
Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 13 |
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 26 |
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 26 |
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 26 |
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 26 |
Item 9B. | Other Information | 27 |
PART III | ||
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 27 |
Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 31 |
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 33 |
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 34 |
Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services | 38 |
PART IV | ||
Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules | 39 |
SIGNATURES | 40 |
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements, include discussion and analysis of the financial condition of Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. and our subsidiaries (which may be referred to herein as the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”), our anticipated capital expenditures required to complete projects, amounts of anticipated cash distributions to our stockholders in the future and other matters. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but are the intent, belief, or current expectations of our management based on their knowledge and understanding of the business and industry. Words such as “may,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “should” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. We intend for these forward-looking statements to be covered by the applicable safe harbor provisions created by Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.
Forward-looking statements that were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s view only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results. The forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risk factors identified in the “Risk Factors” section of our prospectus dated July 12, 2011 as supplemented to date.
In addition, the following are some of the more significant risks and uncertainties, although not all risks and uncertainties, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:
· | We are a recently formed entity and our limited operating history makes our future performance difficult to predict. |
· | Our officers and non-independent directors have substantial conflicts of interest because they also are officers and owners of our Advisor and its affiliates, including our sponsor and our dealer manager. |
· | During the early stages of our operations, until the proceeds of our public offering are invested in real estate and real estate-related investments, we have funded and expect to continue to fund distributions from the un-invested proceeds of our public offering and borrowings. Thereafter, we may pay distributions from un-invested proceeds of our public offering, borrowings and the sale of assets to the extent distributions exceed our earnings or cash flows from operations. |
· | We will rely on our Advisor, an affiliate of our officers and non-independent directors, to manage our business and select and manage investments. Our Advisor is a recently formed entity. The success of our business will depend on the success of our Advisor in performing these duties. |
· | To the extent we sell substantially less than the maximum number of shares in our public offering, we may not have sufficient funds, after the payment of offering and related expenses, to acquire a diverse portfolio of properties. |
· | We may fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. We would then be subject to corporate level taxation and we would not be required to pay any distributions to our stockholders. |
· | Our offering was suspended from November 17, 2010 until March 2, 2011 in connection with our determination to restate certain of our financial statements. These restatements resulted in substantial unanticipated costs in the form of accounting, legal fees, and similar professional fees, in addition to the substantial diversion of time and attention of our Chief Financial Officer and members of our accounting team in preparing the restatements. Our current corporate operating expenses exceed the cash flow received from our investments in real estate joint ventures. If the rate at which we raise offering proceeds does not improve significantly, our general and administrative costs will remain higher relative to the size of our portfolio. Moreover, we cannot predict the impact of the restatement on our ability to increase sales. |
3 |
· | If we have not sold all of the shares in this offering by October 15, 2012, we intend to extend the primary offering by an additional six months by filing a registration statement to register a follow-on offering of shares of our common stock prior to October 15, 2012. By filing a registration statement for a follow-on offering prior to October 15, 2012, we would be able to continue selling shares of common stock with the same terms and conditions pursuant to that registration statement following April 15, 2013. There is no assurance that the follow-on offering will become effective and to the extent our follow on offering does not become effective we would not be able to sell securities beyond April 15, 2013. |
Cautionary Note
The representations, warranties, and covenants made by us in any agreement filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are made solely for the benefit of the parties to the agreement, including, in some cases, for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties to the agreement, and should not be deemed to be representations, warranties, or covenants to or with any other parties. Moreover, these representations, warranties, or covenants should not be relied upon as accurately describing or reflecting the current state of our affairs.
4 |
PART I
Item 1. Business
Organization
Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on July 25, 2008 under the laws of the state of Maryland. We have elected to be treated, and currently qualify, as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes. As a REIT, we generally are not subject to corporate-level income taxes. To maintain our REIT status, we are required, among other requirements, to distribute annually at least 90% of our “REIT taxable income,” as defined by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. We were incorporated to raise capital and acquire a diverse portfolio of residential real estate assets.
On August 22, 2008, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to offer a maximum of $1,000,000,000 in shares of our common stock in our primary offering, at an offering price of $10.00 per share, with discounts available for certain categories of purchasers and up to $285,000,000 in shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at $9.50 per share (the “Initial Public Offering”). The SEC declared our registration statement effective on October 15, 2009. As of May 20, 2010, we had received gross offering proceeds sufficient to satisfy the minimum offering amount for the Initial Public Offering. Accordingly, we broke escrow with respect to subscriptions received from all states in which our shares were being offered. As of March 2, 2012, we had accepted aggregate gross offering proceeds of $11,670,291. We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from the Initial Public Offering to invest in a diverse portfolio of real estate and real estate-related assets.
On July 5, 2011, we provided our former dealer manager, Select Capital Corporation (“Select Capital”), with notice that it considers the Dealer Manager Agreement with Select Capital entered into on October 15, 2009 to have been terminated, effective immediately. In addition, on July 5, 2011, we entered into a Dealer Manager Agreement with Bluerock Capital Markets, LLC (“Bluerock Capital Markets”), our affiliate, pursuant to which it assumed dealer manager responsibilities for the remainder of the Initial Public Offering. The dealer manager is responsible for marketing the Company’s shares in the Initial Public Offering.
We have no employees and are supported by related-party service agreements. We are externally managed by Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Advisors, LLC (the “Advisor”), a Delaware limited liability company organized in 2007. Our day-to-day operations are managed by our Advisor, under an advisory agreement. Our advisory agreement has a one-year term expiring October 14, 2012, and may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon the mutual consent of our Advisor and us. The Advisor is responsible for managing our affairs on a day-to-day basis and for identifying and making real estate investments on our behalf. Substantially all our business is conducted through our operating partnership Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Holdings LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Bluerock Holdings”).
The principal executive offices of our company and the Advisor are located at Heron Building, 70 East 55th Street, New York, New York 10022. Our telephone number is (877) 826-BLUE (2583).
Equity Method Investments
As of December 31, 2011, we, through joint venture partnerships, own equity interests in five multifamily real estate properties. For more information regarding our investment, see "Item 2. Properties".
Investment Objectives
We intend to acquire a diversified portfolio of real estate and real estate-related investments, with a primary focus on well-located, institutional-quality multifamily properties with strong and stable cash flows. We intend to implement what we refer to as the “Enhanced Multifamily” strategy at these multifamily properties, which we believe will increase rents, tenant retention and property values, and generate attractive returns for our investors. We also intend to acquire well-located residential properties that we believe present significant opportunities for short-term capital appreciation, such as those requiring repositioning, renovation or redevelopment, and properties available at opportunistic prices from distressed or time-constrained sellers. In addition, we will seek to originate or invest in real estate-related securities that we believe present the potential for high current income or total return, including but not limited to mortgage, bridge or subordinated loans, debt securities and preferred or other equity securities of other real estate companies, which we refer to as real estate-related investments, and may invest in entities that make similar investments.
5 |
We may adjust our targeted portfolio allocation based on, among other things, prevailing real estate market conditions and the availability of attractive investment opportunities. We will not forego an attractive investment because it does not fit within our targeted asset class or portfolio composition. The volume and value of properties and real estate-related investments we acquire will depend initially on the proceeds of the Initial Public Offering.
Enhanced Multifamily Strategy
The Advisor’s Enhanced Multifamily strategy consists of a series of initiatives that we believe can create a sustainable competitive advantage and allow us to realize long-term increases in multifamily property value. This strategy seeks to transform the perception of the apartment from a purely functional one (i.e., as solely a place to live) to a lifestyle product / community (i.e., as a place to live, interact, and socialize) thereby creating an enhanced perception of value among residents, allowing for premium rental rates, and improving resident retention.
The initiatives consist of amenities and attributes that go beyond traditional features, and incorporate cosmetic and architectural improvements along with technology, music and activities to establish an enhanced sense of comfort and appeal to our target residents’ desire for a “sense of community” by creating places to gather, socialize and interact in a highly amenitized environment. This strategy is specifically targeted to appeal to the following two lucrative and rapidly growing segments of the multifamily market:
· | Lifestyle Renters are generally established, adult households with multiple housing choices open to them, that choose to rent an apartment for primarily nonfinancial reasons. They include Baby Boomers (individuals born in the U.S. between 1946 and 1964), who have become empty nesters and are seeking to live a simpler lifestyle without the responsibilities of home ownership, as well as older members of the Echo Boomers (the generation born in the U.S. between 1981 and 2000). |
· | Middle Market Renters are generally younger and more mobile than Lifestyle Renters, and while they can generally afford to own, they have chosen either to save their money (perhaps to purchase a larger house at a later date), to spend it on other goods and services or to invest in something other than housing, or they are in a personal or job transition. For Middle Market Renters an apartment can provide an inexpensive and maintenance-free residence. |
As a further benefit, by appealing to and attracting the Lifestyle Renters and Middle Market renters, we believe the Enhanced Multifamily strategy can generate significant additional revenue-enhancing options at our properties, including the ability to provide and charge for premium units, upgrade packages and equipment rentals such as washers and dryers, flat screen televisions and premium sound systems.
Borrowing Policies
Under our charter, the maximum amount of our indebtedness may not exceed 300% of our net assets as of the date of any borrowing, which is generally expected to approximate 75% of the cost of our investments; however, we may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors. There is no limit on the amount we may borrow for the purchase of any single property or other investment. Our Board of Directors must review our aggregate borrowings at least quarterly.
Distribution Policy
Generally, our policy will be to pay distributions from cash flow from operations. However, to date all of our distributions have been paid from the proceeds of the Initial Public Offering, and we expect that some or all of our future distributions will be paid from sources other than cash flow from operations, such as from the proceeds of the Initial Public Offering, cash advances to us by the Advisor, cash resulting from a waiver or deferral of asset management fees and borrowings (including borrowings secured by our assets) in anticipation of future operating cash flow until such time as we have sufficient cash flow from operations to fully fund the payment of distributions therefrom. Further, because we may receive income from interest or rents at various times during our fiscal year and because we may need cash flow from operations during a particular period to fund capital expenditures and other expenses, we expect that at least during the early stages of our development and from time to time during our operational stage, we will declare distributions in anticipation of cash flow that we expect to receive during a later period, and we will pay these distributions in advance of our actual receipt of these funds. We may fund such distributions from advances from the Advisor or sponsors or from the Advisor’s deferral of its asset management fee.
6 |
To the extent that we repurchase shares pursuant to our share repurchase plan or make payments or reimburse certain expenses to the Advisor pursuant to our advisory agreement, our cash flow and therefore our ability to make distributions from cash flow, as well as cash flow available for investment, will be negatively impacted. In addition, certain amounts we are required to pay to the Advisor, including the monthly asset management fee, the property management fee, the financing fee, the disposition fee and the payment made upon conversion of our convertible stock, depend on the assets acquired, gross revenues of the properties managed, indebtedness incurred, sales prices of investments sold or the value of our company at the time of conversion, respectively, and therefore cannot be quantified or reserved for until such fees have been earned. We are required to pay these amounts to the Advisor regardless of the amount of cash we distribute to our stockholders, and therefore our ability to make distributions from cash flow, as well as cash flow available for investment, to our stockholders may be negatively impacted. In addition, to the extent we invest in development or redevelopment projects or in properties that have significant capital requirements, these properties will not immediately generate operating cash flow. Thus, our ability to make distributions may be negatively impacted, especially during our early periods of operation.
We paid our first distribution on June 1, 2010 and we expect to declare distributions on a quarterly basis and to pay distributions to our stockholders on a monthly basis. We calculate these monthly distributions based on daily record dates so our investors will become eligible for distributions immediately upon the purchase of their shares. Distributions will be paid to stockholders as of the record dates selected by our Board of Directors.
We are required to make distributions sufficient to satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT for tax purposes. Generally, distributed income will not be taxable to us under the Code if we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income.
Distributions will be authorized at the discretion of our Board of Directors, in accordance with our earnings, cash flow, anticipated cash flow and general financial condition. The board’s discretion will be directed, in substantial part, by its intention to cause us to comply with the REIT requirements. Because we may receive income from interest or rents at various times during our fiscal year, distributions may not reflect our income earned in that particular distribution period but may be made in anticipation of cash flow that we expect to receive during a later period and may be made in advance of actual receipt of funds in an attempt to make distributions relatively uniform. We may utilize capital, borrow money, issue new securities or sell assets in order to make distributions. In addition, from time to time, the Advisor and its affiliates may, but are not required to, agree to waive or defer all or a portion of the acquisition, asset management or other fees or other incentives due to them, enter into lease agreements for un-leased space, pay general and administrative expenses or otherwise supplement investor returns in order to increase the amount of cash available to make distributions to our stockholders.
Many of the factors that can affect the availability and timing of cash distributions to stockholders are beyond our control, and a change in any one factor could adversely affect our ability to pay future distributions. There can be no assurance that future cash flow will support distributions at the rate that such distributions are paid in any particular distribution period.
Regulations
Our investments are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws, ordinances and regulations, including, among other things, zoning regulations, land use controls, environmental controls relating to air and water quality, noise pollution and indirect environmental impacts such as increased motor vehicle activity. We believe that we have all permits and approvals necessary under current law to operate our investments.
Environmental
As an owner of real estate, we are subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments. Compliance with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, and management does not believe it will have such an impact in the future. However, we cannot predict the impact of unforeseen environmental contingencies or new or changed laws or regulations on properties in which we hold an interest, or on properties that may be acquired directly or indirectly in the future.
7 |
Industry Segment
Our current business consists of investing in and operating multifamily communities. Substantially all of our consolidated net loss is from investments in real estate properties that we own through joint ventures which we account for under the equity method of accounting. We internally evaluate operating performance on an individual property level and view our real estate assets as one industry segment, and, accordingly, our properties are aggregated into one reportable segment.
Available Information
We electronically file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports with the SEC. We also have filed with the SEC registration statements on Form S-11 in connection with the Initial Public Offering of our common stock. Copies of our filings with the SEC may be obtained from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Access to these filings is free of charge.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We have omitted a discussion of risk factors because, as a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide such information. For a discussion of the significant factors that make an investment in our shares risky, see the prospectus that relates to the Initial Public Offering and the Liquidity and Capital Resources Section under Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations of this report.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
We have no unresolved staff comments.
Item 2. Properties
We, through wholly-owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership, have acquired five investments through unconsolidated joint ventures as further described below. The following is a summary of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2011($ amounts in thousands):
Joint
Venture Equity Investment Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily
Community Name/Location | Approx. Rentable Square Footage | Number of Units | Date Acquired | Property
Acquisition Cost(1) | Our
Ownership Interest in Property Owner | Approx. Annualized Base Rent (2) | Average Annual Effective Rent Per Unit(3) | Approx.
% Leased | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Springhouse at Newport News/Newport News, Virginia | 310,826 | 432 | 12/3/2009 | $ | 29,250 | 37.50 | % | $ | 4,220 | $ | 9 | 92 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
The Reserve at Creekside Village/Chattanooga, Tennessee | 211,632 | 192 | 3/31/2010 | $ | 14,250 | 23.31 | % | $ | 2,137 | $ | 11 | 95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
The Apartments at Meadowmont/Chapel Hill, North Carolina | 296,240 | 258 | 4/9/2010 | $ | 36,960 | 16.25 | % | $ | 4,058 | $ | 16 | 95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
The Estates at Perimeter/ Augusta, Georgia | 266,148 | 240 | 9/1/2010 | $ | 24,950 | 25.00 | % | $ | 2,916 | $ | 12 | 93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Gardens at Hillsboro Village/ Nashville, Tennessee | 187,430 | 201 | 9/30/2010 | $ | 32,394 | 12.50 | % | $ | 3,372 | $ | 17 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Total/Average | 1,272,276 | 1,323 | $ | 137,804 | $ | 16,703 | $ | 13 | 95 | % |
(1) | Property Acquisition Cost excludes acquisition fees and closing costs. |
8 |
(2) | Annualized base rent is calculated by annualizing the current, in-place monthly base rent for leases as of December 31, 2011 and does not take into account any rent concessions or prospective rent increases. |
(3) | Annual effective rent per unit includes the effect of tenant concessions over the term of the lease. |
Joint Ventures
We accounted for the acquisitions of our interests in properties through managing member LLCs in accordance with the provisions of the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).
A variable interest entity (“VIE”) is an entity that has (i) insufficient equity to permit it to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) equity holders that lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. VIE’s are consolidated by the primary beneficiary, which is the entity that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that potentially could be significant to the entity. Variable interests in a VIE are contractual, ownership, or other financial interests in a VIE that change with changes in the fair value of the VIE’s net assets. We continuously re-assesses whether our interest in the managing member LLC is (i) a VIE, and (ii) if we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE.
For Springhouse, Augusta and Hillsboro our contribution into the managing member LLC was funded through a loan from an affiliate who is another investor in the managing member LLC, thus our equity investment is not at risk. Since unanimous approval is required by all members to direct the activities that most significantly impact the managing member LLC’s economic performance, the holder of the equity investment at risk lacks that power and thus we concluded that the managing member LLC entities are VIE’s. We are not the primary beneficiary because we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the managing member LLC and would not be considered to be the investor that is most closely associated with the entity among the related party investors. As a result, our investments are reflected as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting.
For Creekside our initial contribution into the managing member LLC was funded through a loan from an affiliate and accounted for as discussed above, however on September 28, 2010 the loan was repaid and the managing member LLC was no longer considered a VIE. We then analyzed the managing member LLC under a voting interest model and determined that the investment in the unconsolidated joint venture should be accounted for under the equity method as each member had an equal voting interest.
For Meadowmont our initial contribution into the managing member LLC on April 9, 2010 was funded through a loan from an affiliate who is another investor in the managing member LLC, but this was subsequently repaid on June 8, 2010. However, the voting rights of the investors are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses or their rights to receive the expected residual returns of the managing member and substantially all of the activities are done on behalf of the single related party group (all of the investors are part of a single related party group); thus this would cause the managing member LLC to be a VIE. We are not the primary beneficiary because we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the managing member LLC and would not be considered to be the investor that is most closely associated with the entity among the related party investors. As a result our investment is reflected as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are not party to, and none of our properties are subject to, any material pending legal proceeding.
Item 4. [Removed and Reserved]
9 |
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Market Information
There is no established public trading market for our common stock. Therefore, there is a risk that a stockholder may not be able to sell our stock at a time or price acceptable to the stockholder. Pursuant to the Initial Public Offering, we are selling shares of our common stock to the public at a price of $10.00 per share and at a price of $9.50 per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. Unless and until our shares are listed on a national securities exchange, it is not expected that a public market for the shares will develop.
To facilitate Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) member participation in the Initial Public Offering, we disclose in each annual report distributed to stockholders a per share estimated value of our common stock, the method by which it was developed, and the date of the data used to develop the estimated value. In addition, beginning 18 months after the completion of our offering stage, we will prepare annual statements of estimated share values to assist both fiduciaries of retirement plans subject to the annual reporting requirements of ERISA and custodians of individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”) in the preparation of their reports relating to an investment in our shares. For these purposes, our estimated value of a share of our common stock is $10.00 per share as of December 31, 2011. The basis for this valuation is the fact that the current public offering price for our shares in the Initial Public Offering is $10.00 per share (ignoring purchase price discounts for certain categories of purchasers). However, this estimated value is likely to be higher than the price at which you could resell your shares because (1) our public offering involves the payment of underwriting compensation and other directed selling efforts, which payments and efforts are likely to produce a higher sales price than could otherwise be obtained, and (2) no public market exists for our shares.
Until 18 months after the completion of our offering stage, we intend to use the price paid per share as the estimated value of a share of our common stock; provided, however, that if we have sold properties or other assets and have made one or more special distributions to stockholders of all or a portion of the net proceeds from such sales, the estimated value of a share of our common stock will be equal to the offering price of shares in our most recent offering less the amount of net sale proceeds per share that constitute a return of capital distributed to investors as a result of such sales. Beginning 18 months after the completion of our offering stage, our Advisor, or another firm we choose for that purpose, will estimate the value of our shares based on a number of assumptions that may not be accurate or complete.
This estimated value is not likely to reflect the proceeds you would receive upon our liquidation (in part because the estimated values do not necessarily indicate the price at which assets could be sold and because the estimate may not take into account the expenses of selling our assets) or upon the sale of your shares. Accordingly, we can make no assurances that such estimated value will satisfy the applicable annual valuation requirements under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code.
Shareholder Information
As of March 2, 2012, we had approximately 1,255,347 shares of common stock outstanding held by a total of 408 stockholders.
Distributions
As of May 20, 2010, we had received gross offering proceeds sufficient to satisfy the minimum offering amount for the Initial Public Offering and paid our first distribution on June 1, 2010. Until we generate sufficient cash flow from operations or funds from operations (“FFO”) to fully fund the payment of distributions, some or all of our distributions will be paid from other sources. We may generate cash to pay distributions from financing activities, components of which may include borrowings (including borrowings secured by our assets) in anticipation of future operating cash flow and proceeds of this offering. In addition, from time to time, the Advisor and its affiliates may agree to waive or defer all, or a portion, of the acquisition, asset management or other fees or other incentives due to them, enter into lease agreements for unleased space, pay general and administrative expenses or otherwise supplement investor returns in order to increase the amount of cash available to make distributions to our stockholders. In addition, to the extent we invest in development or redevelopment projects or in properties that have significant capital requirements, these properties may not immediately generate cash flow from operations or FFO. Thus, our ability to make distributions may be negatively impacted, especially during our early periods of operation.
We expect our Board of Directors to declare distributions on a quarterly basis and to pay distributions to our stockholders on a monthly basis. We calculate these monthly distributions based on daily record dates so our investors will become eligible for distributions immediately upon purchasing shares. Distributions will be paid to stockholders as of the record dates selected by the directors.
10 |
Distributions by quarter for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectfully, were as follows:
Distributions Paid | Sources of Cash Distributions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | Distributions Reinvested (DRIP) | Total | Cash Flow Used in Operations | Total Distributions Declared | Declared Distributions Per Share(1) | Cash Flow Provided by Operations/ Percent of Total Cash Distributions Paid | Offering Proceeds/ Percent of Total Cash Distributions Paid | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter | $ | 88,927 | $ | 28,113 | $ | 117,040 | $ | (18,644 | ) | $ | 117,538 | $ | 0.175 | $0.00/0 | $88,927/100% | |||||||||||||||
Second Quarter | 83,135 | 46,179 | 129,314 | (510,379 | ) | 134,526 | 0.175 | 0.00/0 | 83,135/100% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Third Quarter | 92,101 | 51,968 | 144,069 | (295,429 | ) | 148,402 | 0.175 | 0.00/0 | 92,101/100% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter | 102,000 | 61,779 | 163,779 | (227,241 | ) | 176,628 | 0.175 | 0.00/0 | 101,999/100% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 366,163 | $ | 188,039 | $ | 554,202 | $ | (1,051,693 | ) | $ | 577,094 | $ | 0.700 | $0.00/0 | $366,162/100% | |||||||||||||||
2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter(1) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 111,291 | $ | - | $ | - | $0.00/0 | $ -/- % | ||||||||||||||||
Second Quarter | 4,079 | 2,473 | 6,552 | (30,952 | ) | 27,655 | 0.078 | 0.00/0 | 4,079/100% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Third Quarter | 45,952 | 31,422 | 77,374 | (572,386 | ) | 89,432 | 0.175 | 0.00/0 | 45,952/100% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter | 79,343 | 29,439 | 108,782 | (378,058 | ) | 115,907 | 0.175 | 0.00/0 | 79,343/100% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 129,374 | $ | 63,334 | $ | 192,708 | $ | (870,105 | ) | $ | 232,994 | $ | 0.428 | $0.00/0 | $129,374/100% |
(1) Our first distribution was paid on June 1, 2010.
Distributions declared per share assumes the share was issued and outstanding each day during the period and was based on a declared daily distribution rate of $0.00191781 beginning May 20, 2010.
Equity Compensation Plan
We have adopted the Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the Incentive Plan, in order to enable us to (1) provide an incentive to our employees, officers, directors, and consultants and employees and officers of our Advisor to increase the value of our common stock, (2) give such persons a stake in our future that corresponds to the stake of each of our stockholders, and (3) obtain or retain the services of these persons who are considered essential to our long-term success, by offering such persons an opportunity to participate in our growth through ownership of our common stock or through other equity-related awards. We intend to issue awards only to our independent directors under our Incentive Plan (which awards will be granted under the independent director’s compensation plan). We have reserved and authorized an aggregate number of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under the Incentive Plan.
11 |
The following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under our incentive award plan, as of December 31, 2011.
Plan Category | Number of Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights | Weighted- Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | - | - | 1,970,000 | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | - | - | - | |||||||||
Total | - | - | 1,970,000 |
We have granted each of our independent directors 5,000 shares of restricted stock as of the commencement of the Initial Public Offering on October 15, 2009, and 2,500 shares of restricted stock as of their reelection to the Board of Directors on March 15, 2010 and again on August 8, 2011. The restricted stock vests as to 20% of the shares on the date of grant and as to 20% of the shares on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of the grant thereafter.
Use of Proceeds from Sales of Registered Securities and Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
On October 15, 2009, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-153135), covering a public offering of up to 130 million shares of common stock, was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933. We commenced our initial public offering on October 15, 2009. We are offering 100 million shares of common stock in our primary offering at an aggregate offering price of up to $1 billion, or $10 per share with discount available to certain categories of purchasers. The 30 million shares offered under our distribution reinvestment plan are initially being offered at an aggregate offering price of $285 million, or $9.50 per share.
On August 8, 2011, our Board of Directors approved an extension of this offering for an additional one-year period, and we expect to offer shares of common stock in our primary offering until October 15, 2012. If we have not sold all of the shares in this offering by October 15, 2012, we may extend the primary offering by an additional 6 months if we file a registration statement to register a follow-on public offering of shares of our common stock prior to October 15, 2012. We may sell shares under the distribution reinvestment plan beyond the termination of the primary offering until we have sold all shares under the plan.
As of December 31, 2011, including shares issued through our distribution reinvestment plan, we had sold approximately 1,120,693 shares of common stock in our ongoing public offering and raised gross offering proceeds of approximately $10,339,123. From this amount, we incurred approximately $958,385 in selling commissions and dealer manager fees payable to our dealer manager. We had used approximately $4,128,598 of net proceeds to purchase interests in real estate, net of notes payable.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, upon re-election to the Board of Directors on August 8, 2011, each of our non-employee directors received an automatic grant of 2,500 shares of restricted common stock pursuant to the Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. Independent Directors Compensation Plan. All such shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities
During the year ended December 31, 2011, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
Share Repurchase Plan
We have adopted a share repurchase program that may enable stockholders to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances. We amended and restated our share repurchase program on February 12, 2010. The effect of the amendment was to change the price at which we will repurchase the shares. As amended, prior to establishing the estimated value of our shares, the prices at which we will initially repurchase shares are as follows:
· | The lower of $9.25 or the price paid to acquire the shares from us for stockholders who have held their shares for at least one year; |
· | The lower of $9.50 or the price paid to acquire the shares from us for stockholders who have held their shares for at least two years; |
· | The lower of $9.75 or the price paid to acquire the shares from us for stockholders who have held their shares for at least three years; and |
· | The lower of $10.00 or the price paid to acquire the shares from us for stockholders who have held their shares for at least four years. |
As of December 31, 2011, we have repurchased $63,334 of common stock. Based on the amount of net proceeds raised from the sale of shares under the dividend reinvestment plan during 2010 totaling $63,334, we redeemed the entire amount available during 2011. We have received additional redemption requests that we are able to fill from the remaining net proceeds from the sale of the shares under the dividend reinvestment plan for 2011 totaling $212,767.
12 |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period | Total
Number of Shares Purchased | Average
Price Paid Per Share | Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum
Number (or Appropriate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||
October 1, 2011 through October 31, 2011 | 5,225 | $ | 9.25 | 5,225 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
November 1, 2011 through November 30, 2011 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
December 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total | 5,225 | $ | 9.25 | 5,225 | (1 | ) |
(1) | A description of the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under our share repurchase plan is included in the narrative preceding this table. |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
We have omitted presentation of selected financial data because, as a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide such information.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc., and the notes thereto. As used herein, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and, as required by context, Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Holdings, L.P. , a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer to as our “operating partnership,” and to their subsidiaries. Also see “Forward-Looking Statements” preceding Part I.
Overview
We were incorporated as a Maryland corporation on July 25, 2008, and have elected to be taxed, and currently qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
As of May 20, 2010 we had received gross offering proceeds sufficient to satisfy the minimum offering amount. Accordingly, we broke escrow with respect to subscriptions received from all states in which our shares are currently being offered. As of March 2, 2012 we had accepted aggregate gross offering proceeds of $11,670,291. We will experience a relative increase in liquidity as we accept additional subscriptions for shares and a relative decrease in liquidity as we spend net offering proceeds in connection with the acquisition, development and operation of our assets.
We intend to make reserve allocations as necessary to aid our objective of preserving capital for our investors by supporting the maintenance and viability of properties we acquire. If reserves and any other available income become insufficient to cover our operating expenses and liabilities, it may be necessary to obtain additional funds by borrowing, refinancing properties or liquidating our investment in one or more properties. There is no assurance that such funds will be available or, if available, that the terms will be acceptable to us.
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and have qualified since our taxable year ended December 31, 2010. In order to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our stockholders each calendar year at least 90% of our taxable income (excluding net capital gains). If we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify as a REIT for four years following the year in which our qualification is denied. Such an event could materially and adversely affect our net income and results of operations. We intend to continue to organize and operate in such a manner as to remain qualified for treatment as a REIT.
13 |
Our Investment Strategy
We intend to achieve our investment objectives by acquiring a diverse portfolio of real estate and real estate-related investments. We plan to diversify our portfolio by investment type, size, property location and risk with the goal of attaining a portfolio that will generate attractive returns for our investors, with the potential for capital appreciation. Our targeted portfolio allocation is as follows:
· | Enhanced Multifamily. We intend to allocate approximately 50% of our portfolio to investments in well-located, institutional quality multifamily properties that we believe demonstrate strong and stable cash flows, typically located in supply constrained sub-markets with relatively high expectations of rent growth. As appropriate, we intend to implement our Advisor’s Enhanced Multifamily strategy (as described in the prospectus relating to our ongoing Initial Public Offering) at these properties, which we anticipate will create sustainable long-term increases in property value and lead to increased returns to our investors by, among other benefits, generating higher rental revenue and reducing resident turnover. |
· | Value-Added Residential. We intend to allocate approximately 30% of our portfolio to investments in well-located, residential properties that offer a significant potential for short-term capital appreciation through repositioning, renovation or redevelopment. In addition, we will seek to acquire properties available at opportunistic prices from distressed or time-constrained sellers in need of liquidity. As appropriate, we intend to implement our Advisor’s Enhanced Multifamily strategy at these properties as well. |
· | Real Estate-Related Investments. We intend to allocate approximately 20% of our portfolio in other real estate-related investments with the potential for high current income or significant total returns. These investments could include first and second mortgages, subordinated, bridge and other loans, debt and other securities related to or secured by real estate assets, and common and preferred equity, which may include securities of other REITs and real estate companies. Excluded from this 20% allocation is joint venture investments in which we exercise some control. Subject to the provisions of our charter, some of these investments may be made in connection with programs sponsored, managed or advised by our affiliates or those of our Advisor. |
Although the above outlines our target portfolio, we may make adjustments based on, among other things, prevailing real estate market conditions and the availability of attractive investment opportunities. We will not forego an attractive investment because it does not fit within our targeted asset class or portfolio composition. We may use the proceeds of the Initial Public Offering to purchase or invest in any type of real estate or real estate-related investment which we determine is in the best interest of our stockholders, subject to the provisions of our charter which limit certain types of investments.
Our primary objectives are to raise capital and to take advantage of favorable investment opportunities. We believe that the current economic environment will result in investment opportunities for many high-quality real estate investments. To the extent that we have capital available to invest, we plan to actively pursue investment opportunities to continue to execute our business plan.
14 |
Results of Operations
The SEC declared the registration statement for our best efforts Initial Public Offering effective on October 15, 2009. On July 5, 2011, we provided our former dealer manager, Select Capital Corporation (“Select Capital”), with notice that we consider the Dealer Manager Agreement with Select Capital entered into on October 15, 2009 to have been terminated, effective immediately. In addition, on July 5, 2011, we entered into a dealer manager agreement with Bluerock Capital Markets, LLC (“Bluerock Capital Markets”), our affiliate, pursuant to which it assumed dealer manager responsibilities for the remainder of the Initial Public Offering. The dealer manager is responsible for marketing our shares in the Initial Public Offering. Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 are not indicative of those expected in future periods as we are still in our organizational and development stage.
Our management is not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, favorable or unfavorable, other than national economic conditions affecting our targeted portfolio, the apartment housing industry and real estate generally, which may be reasonably anticipated to have a material impact on the revenues or incomes to be derived from the operation of our assets.
Year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010
As of December 31, 2011, we have ownership interests in five joint ventures. In general, we expect that our income and expenses related to our portfolio will increase in future periods as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related investments. We did not acquire any properties or make other investments in the year ended December 31, 2011.
Asset management and oversight fees to affiliates increased $106,720 from $223,436 for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $330,156 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase is due to the acquisitions made during 2010 and represents the asset management fee due, but unpaid, to the Advisor. We expect asset management fees to increase in future periods as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related investments.
Acquisition costs to affiliates was zero for the year ended December 31, 2011 as there were no acquisitions.
General and administrative expenses increased $3,250,257 from $314,691 for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $3,564,948 for the year ended December 31, 2011. In 2010, we expensed allowable expenses up to the 2% limitation of our average invested assets in our income statement and the remainder was recorded as a receivable for the expenses exceeding the 2% threshold until approved by the board during the first quarter of 2011, resulting in a significant increase over the prior year’s recorded amount. Upon approval, these costs totaling $1,646,818 were expensed in 2011. All other amounts represent all expenses incurred during the periods.
Equity loss of unconsolidated joint ventures decreased by $1,073,559 from a loss of $1,147,224 for the year ended December 31, 2010 to a loss of $73,665 for the year ended December 31, 2011. This represents our ownership share of net income (loss) from our real estate investments as detailed in Note 4 (Equity Method Investments) to our consolidated financial statements. The 2011 results included a full year of operating activity at all owned properties. Additionally, 2010 included one-time acquisitions costs incurred during the year for the properties purchased. While revenue variations may occur at any of our properties, the Augusta and Springhouse properties’ revenues are specifically subject to unplanned troop deployment. The property management team is working to fully diversify the tenant mix to lessen a potential impact from unplanned deployments.
15 |
The table below reflects the components of equity loss of unconsolidated joint ventures of $73,665:
Springhouse | Creekside | Meadowmont | Augusta | Hillsboro | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Property Operating Results: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | 3,912,706 | $ | 2,080,133 | $ | 4,012,501 | $ | 2,681,509 | $ | 3,360,558 | $ | 16,047,407 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | (1,440,032 | ) | (873,017 | ) | (1,205,561 | ) | (865,519 | ) | (1,044,437 | ) | (5,428,566 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Operating Income (NOI)(1) | 2,472,674 | 1,207,116 | 2,806,940 | 1,815,990 | 2,316,121 | 10,618,841 | ||||||||||||||||||
Major renovation and other expenses | (166,952 | ) | (147,563 | ) | (199,872 | ) | (40,317 | ) | (142,534 | ) | (697,238 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income Before Debt Service and Depreciation and Amortization | 2,305,722 | 1,059,553 | 2,607,068 | 1,775,673 | 2,173,587 | 9,921,603 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense (2) | (1,342,835 | ) | (593,418 | ) | (1,603,719 | ) | (773,378 | ) | (933,228 | ) | (5,246,578 | ) | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | (1,047,213 | ) | (512,904 | ) | (1,111,263 | ) | (950,338 | ) | (1,117,701 | ) | (4,739,419 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income | (84,326 | ) | (46,769 | ) | (107,914 | ) | 51,957 | 122,658 | (64,394 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to JV partners | (43,477 | ) | (28,501 | ) | (88,064 | ) | 45,983 | 113,273 | (786 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company | (40,849 | ) | (18,268 | ) | (19,850 | ) | 5,974 | 9,385 | (63,608 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs paid on behalf of joint ventures | (4,388 | ) | - | (2,316 | ) | (1,283 | ) | (2,070 | ) | (10,057 | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures | $ | (45,237 | ) | $ | (18,268 | ) | $ | (22,166 | ) | $ | 4,691 | $ | 7,315 | $ | (73,665 | ) |
(1) | We evaluate the performance of our properties based upon NOI, which is a non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (“GAAP”) supplemental financial measure. We use NOI to evaluate the operating performance of our real estate and to make decisions concerning the operation of the property. We believe that NOI is essential to the investor in understanding the value of income-producing real estate. Net income is the GAAP measure that is most directly comparable to NOI; however, NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income as the primary indicator of operating performance as it excludes certain items such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense and corporate general and administrative expenses. Additionally, NOI as defined by us may not be comparable to other REITs or companies as their definitions of NOI may differ from our definition. |
(2) | Aggregate debt service ratio of 1.89. |
The following is a summary of our investments as of December 31, 2011.
Multifamily Community | Date Acquired | Number of Units | Our Ownership Interest in Property Owner | Occupancy % | NOI (1) (in thousands) | Debt Service Coverage Ratio | ||||||||||||||||||
Springhouse at Newport News | 12/03/2009 | 432 | 37.50 | % | 92 | % | $ | 2,473 | 1.72 | |||||||||||||||
The Reserve at Creekside Village | 03/31/2010 | 192 | 23.31 | % | 95 | % | $ | 1,207 | 1.79 | |||||||||||||||
The Apartments at Meadowmont | 04/09/2010 | 258 | 16.25 | % | 95 | % | $ | 2,807 | 1.63 | |||||||||||||||
The Estates at Perimeter | 09/01/2010 | 240 | 25.00 | % | 93 | % | $ | 1,816 | 2.30 | |||||||||||||||
Gardens at Hillsboro Village | 09/30/2010 | 201 | 12.50 | % | 100 | % | $ | 2,316 | 2.33 |
(1) | Please see table above for a reconciliation of our equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures to the NOI of our properties. |
16 |
Interest expense, net increased $87,809 from $258,753 for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $346,562 for the year ended December 31, 2011 and relates to the affiliate loans for the joint venture investments acquired during 2010 and the borrowing on the Meadowmont line of credit in 2011.
Year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009
Net loss increased $1.9 million when compared to the 2009 period. We began our operations on December 3, 2009 with our acquisition of our 37.5% indirect equity interest in the Springhouse property. During 2010 we acquired indirect equity interests in four additional properties.
We accounted for the acquisitions of our interests in properties through managing member LLCs in accordance with the provisions of the Consolidation Topic of the FASB ASC. We analyze our investments in joint ventures to determine if the joint venture is a variable interest entity (a “VIE”) and would require consolidation. We (a) evaluate the sufficiency of the total equity at risk, (b) review the voting rights and decision-making authority of the equity investment holders as a group, and whether there are any guaranteed returns, protection against losses, or capping of residual returns within the group and (c) establish whether activities within the venture are on behalf of an investor with disproportionately few voting rights in making this VIE determination. We would consolidate a venture that is determined to be a VIE if we were the primary beneficiary. Beginning January 1, 2010, a new accounting standard became effective and changed the method by which the primary beneficiary of a VIE is determined to a primarily qualitative approach whereby the variable interest holder, if any, that has the power to direct the VIE’s most significant activities is the primary beneficiary. To the extent that our joint ventures do not qualify as VIEs, we further assess the existence of a controlling financial interest under a voting interest model to determine whether the venture should be consolidated.
Management and Oversight fees were approximately $223,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. This represents the 1% asset management fee due to the Advisor for oversight of the properties and was $214,000 higher than 2009 due to the acquisitions made in 2010.
Acquisition costs were approximately $363,000 for the year ended December, 31, 2010 and relate to the acquisitions of Creekside, Meadowmont, Augusta and Hillsboro properties. Acquisition costs were approximately $192,000 in 2009 as a result of the Springhouse acquisition.
General and administrative expenses were approximately $315,000 and include allowable operating expenses up to the 2% of average invested assets threshold. General and administrative expenses were approximately $45,000 in 2009. The increase in 2010 is due to increased assets on which to base the average invested assets calculation and a full year of operations compared to 2 ½ months in 2009.
Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures was approximately $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 and represents our ownership share of net loss from our investments in the managing member JV Entities.
17 |
The table below reflects the components of the $1,147,224 equity loss of unconsolidated joint ventures:
Springhouse | Creekside | Meadowmont | Augusta | Hillsboro | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Property Operating Results: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | 3,881,600 | $ | 1,423,900 | $ | 2,866,300 | $ | 931,900 | $ | 806,700 | $ | 9,910,400 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | (1,747,500 | ) | (690,100 | ) | (1,005,300 | ) | (338,800 | ) | (261,000 | ) | (4,042,700 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Operating Income (NOI)(1) | 2,134,100 | 733,800 | 1,861,000 | 593,100 | 545,700 | 5,867,700 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense (2) | (1,342,900 | ) | (567,100 | ) | (1,173,100 | ) | (258,500 | ) | (239,500 | ) | (3,581,100 | ) | ||||||||||||
Acquisition fees | - | (602,900 | ) | (499,700 | ) | (373,100 | ) | (463,800 | ) | (1,939,500 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | (1,670,000 | ) | (745,100 | ) | (1,598,000 | ) | (614,800 | ) | (511,400 | ) | (5,139,300 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net loss | (878,800 | ) | (1,181,300 | ) | (1,409,800 | ) | (653,300 | ) | (669,000 | ) | (4,792,200 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to JV partners | (544,019 | ) | (892,530 | ) | (1,177,400 | ) | (486,238 | ) | (580,292 | ) | (3,680,479 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to the Company | (334,781 | ) | (288,770 | ) | (232,400 | ) | (167,062 | ) | (88,708 | ) | (1,111,721 | ) | ||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs paid on behalf of joint ventures | (4,387 | ) | (28,433 | ) | (1,737 | ) | (428 | ) | (518 | ) | (35,503 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity loss of unconsolidated joint ventures | $ | (339,168 | ) | $ | (317,203 | ) | $ | (234,137 | ) | $ | (167,490 | ) | $ | (89,226 | ) | $ | (1,147.224 | ) |
(1) | We evaluate the performance of our properties based upon NOI, which is a non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (“GAAP”) supplemental financial measure. We use NOI to evaluate the operating performance of our real estate and to make decisions concerning the operation of the property. We believe that NOI is essential to the investor in understanding the value of income-producing real estate. Net income is the GAAP measure that is most directly comparable to NOI; however, NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income as the primary indicator of operating performance as it excludes certain items such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense and corporate general and administrative expenses. Additionally, NOI as defined by us may not be comparable to other REITs or companies as their definitions of NOI may differ from our definition. |
(2) | Aggregate debt service ratio of 1.64. |
Interest expense was approximately $259,000 and was for interest related to our affiliate notes used to fund our interests in the joint ventures. Interest expense was $15,000 for 2009 and was related to an affiliate loan to fund our interest in the Springhouse joint venture.
Organization and Offering Costs
Our organization and offering costs (other than selling commissions and dealer manager fees) may be paid by our Advisor, our dealer manager or their affiliates on our behalf. Other offering costs include all expenses to be incurred by us in connection with our Initial Public Offering. Organization costs include all expenses incurred by us in connection with our formation, including but not limited to legal fees and other costs to incorporate. Organization costs are expensed as incurred and offering costs, which include selling commissions and dealer manager fees, are charged as incurred as a reduction to stockholders’ equity.
Pursuant to the advisory agreement and the dealer manager agreement, we are obligated to reimburse our Advisor, the dealer manager or their affiliates, as applicable, for organization and other offering costs paid by them on our behalf; however, our Advisor is obligated to reimburse us to the extent selling commissions, dealer manager fees and organization and other offering costs incurred by us exceed 15% of gross proceeds from our Initial Public Offering. Through December 31, 2011, including shares issued through our distribution reinvestment plan, we had sold 1,120,693 shares in the offering for gross offering proceeds of $10,339,123 and recorded organization costs of $49,931, other offering costs of $2,256,663 and selling commissions and dealer manager fees of $958,386. In addition our Advisor has incurred on our behalf $2,407,524 of offering costs which will become payable as additional offering proceeds are raised to the extent that selling commissions, dealer manager fees and other organization and offering costs do not exceed 15% of gross offering proceeds.
Operating Expenses
Under our advisory agreement our Advisor and its affiliates have the right to seek reimbursement from us for all costs and expenses they incur in connection with their provision of services to us, including our allocable share of our Advisor’s overhead, such as rent, employee costs, utilities and information technology costs. We do not, however, reimburse our Advisor for personnel costs in connection with services for which our Advisor receives acquisition, origination or disposition fees or for personnel costs related to the salaries of our executive officers. From January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011, our Advisor and its affiliates incurred $677,415. Our charter limits our total operating expenses at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters to the greater of (A) 2% of our average invested assets, or (B) 25% of our net income determined (1) without reductions for any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves and (2) excluding any gain from the sale of our assets for the period, notwithstanding the above limitation, we may reimburse amounts in excess of the limitation if a majority or our independent directors determines that such excess amounts were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. Due to the limitations discussed above and because operating expenses incurred directly by us have exceeded the 2% threshold, the amount due to the Advisor had not been recorded in the financial statements as of December 31, 2010. Further, $973,607 had been recorded as a receivable from the Advisor as of December 31, 2010 for the excess operating expenses incurred directly by us over the 2% threshold. Our Board of Directors, including all of our independent directors, reviewed our total operating expenses for the four fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2009 (and the four fiscal quarters ended each quarter after) and an estimate of our total operating expenses for the four fiscal quarters to end March 31, 2011 and unanimously determined the excess amounts to be justified because of the costs of operating a public company in our early stages of operating. Upon approval of these costs on March 22, 2011, $1,646,818 of total costs, were expensed and $677,415 became a liability to us, payable to our Advisor and its affiliates. As of the Board of Directors has approved such expenses, all 2011 operating expenses have been and will be expensed as incurred. As of December 31, 2011, $4,204 has been reimbursed to the Advisor and the Advisor has agreed to defer further repayment of these costs until a later date.
18 |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We are offering a maximum of $1,000,000,000 in shares of our common stock in our primary offering, at an offering price of $10.00 per share, with discounts available for certain categories of purchasers. We also are offering up to $285,000,000 in shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at $9.50 per share.
Our principal demands for cash will be for acquisition costs, including the purchase price of any properties, loans or securities we acquire, and construction, renovation and development costs and the payment of our operating and administrative expenses, continuing debt service obligations and distributions to our stockholders. Generally, we will fund our acquisitions from the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering. We intend to acquire our assets with cash and mortgage or other debt, but we may acquire assets free and clear of permanent mortgage or other indebtedness by paying the entire purchase price for the asset in cash or in units of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership. Due to the delay between the sale of our shares and our acquisitions, there may be a delay in the benefits to our stockholders, if any, of returns generated from our investments.
We generally expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements, such as our operating and administrative expenses, continuing debt service obligations and the payment of distributions, through net cash provided by operations and net proceeds raised in our public offering. Operating cash flow is expected to increase as additional investments are added to our portfolio. We are continuing to raise proceeds in our ongoing Initial Public Offering; however, we suspended our offering on November 17, 2010 in order to restate certain of our financial statements and selling efforts did not recommence until March 2, 2011. In order to fund general working capital while our offering was suspended, on January 20, 2011 we entered a loan agreement for a line of credit with an affiliate of our sponsor that permits us to borrow up to $500,000 and we had borrowed $150,000 during 2011 and repaid the balance in full as of December 31, 2011. Our current corporate operating expenses exceed the cash flow received from our investments in real estate joint ventures. If the rate at which we raise offering proceeds does not improve significantly, our general and administrative costs will remain higher relative to the size of our portfolio and we may be required to incur additional debt to fund our operations. To the extent cash on hand is not sufficient to meet our short-term liquidity requirements, we expect to utilize credit facilities obtained from affiliates or unaffiliated third parties. Our sponsor also agreed to defer payment of asset management fees, acquisition fees and operating and offering costs advanced on our behalf and current year reimbursable operating expenses through 2012 as well as to fund any remaining cash shortfall, as necessary. In addition as our sponsor has management control of the affiliates that are lenders to us and thus extended the notes that had maturities in 2011 (including Augusta, Springhouse, Hillsboro and Meadowmont), and it has committed to further extend such notes based on our ability to repay those obligations.
In addition, our policy is generally to pay distributions from cash flow from operations. However, some or all of our distributions to date have been paid from proceeds from our public offering and may in the future be paid from additional sources, such as from borrowings, advances from our Advisor, and our Advisor’s deferral of its fees and expense reimbursements. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, such as scheduled debt maturities and repayment of short-term financing of future property acquisitions, through long-term secured and unsecured borrowings.
Potential future sources of capital include secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, establishing additional lines of credit, proceeds from the sale of properties and undistributed cash flow.
19 |
Our charter prohibits us from incurring debt that would cause our borrowings to exceed 300% of our net assets unless a majority of our independent directors approves the borrowing. Our charter also requires that we disclose the justification for any borrowings in excess of the 300% leverage guideline in the next quarterly report. Our independent directors approved the borrowing of up to approximately $10.3 million to purchase the Springhouse, Creekside, Meadowmont, Augusta and Hillsboro properties resulting in a leverage ratio in excess of the 300% guideline. The independent directors determined that the excess leverage was justified for the following reasons:
· | the loans enabled us to purchase the property and earn rental income more quickly; |
· | the property acquisition is likely to increase the net offering proceeds from our initial public offering, thereby improving our ability to meet our goal of acquiring a diversified portfolio of properties to generate current income for investors and preserve investor capital; |
· | the loans are non-recourse to us; and |
· | the prospectus for our initial public offering disclosed the likelihood that we would exceed the charter’s leverage guidelines during the early stages of the offering. |
As of July 5, 2011, Bluerock Capital Markets, an affiliate of us and our Advisor, assumed the role of dealer manager for the remainder of the Initial Public Offering. Prior to July 5, 2011, Select Capital Corporation, a third party, served as dealer manager for the Initial Public Offering. We expect that this transition to an affiliated dealer manager will lead to greater sales of shares in the Initial Public Offering; however, we can provide no assurances that this will be the case. If Bluerock Capital Markets is unsuccessful in its efforts to market the Initial Public Offering, our liquidity will be adversely affected which would adversely affect our ability to fund our ongoing operations and make acquisitions.
Cash Flows
Year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
As of December 31, 2011, we owned indirect equity interests in five real estate properties. During the year ended December 31, 2011, net cash used in operating activities was $1,051,693 and primarily consisted of our net loss of $4,315,331. This was offset by the following increases in our cash from operations:
· | cash distributions received from our unconsolidated joint ventures of $904,949; |
· | increase in due to affiliates of $2,144,589; and |
· | Non-cash adjustments that increase our cash flow from operations: |
o | a non-cash adjustment for director’s stock compensation of $68,125; |
o | loss in unconsolidated joint ventures of $73,665, which includes our pro-rata share of (1) non-cash adjustment for the depreciation and amortization at the property level, (2) any non-recurring acquisition costs incurred in the year we acquired our indirect equity interest in the property. |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Our cash used in investing for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $63,901 for the additional capital needs related to our indirect equity interests in the real estate properties indicated above.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Our cash flows from financing consist primarily of proceeds from the Initial Public Offering (which offering we temporarily suspended from November 17, 2010 until March 2, 2011 in connection with our determination to restate certain of our financial statements) and proceeds from affiliate loans less distributions paid to our stockholders.
20 |
For the year ended December 31, 2011, net cash provided by financing activities was $1,410,927, which consisted of the following:
· | $4,135,093 of gross offering proceeds related to our Initial Public Offering, net of (1) payments of commissions on sales of common stock and related dealer manager fees in the amount of $393,057, (2) and offering costs paid by us directly in the amount of $901,612; |
· | $150,000 of proceeds from affiliate loans. |
This was offset by:
· | $366,163 of net cash distributions, after giving effect to distributions reinvested by stockholders of $212,767; |
· | repayment on notes payable of $1,150,000; and |
· | redemption of common stock of $63,334. |
Year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
As of December 31, 2010, we owned indirect equity interests in five real estate properties. During the year ended December 31, 2010, net cash used in operating activities was $870,105 and consisted of the following:
· | A net loss of $2,306,870; |
· | Increase in receivables from affiliates of $542,529; and |
· | Increase in other assets of $82,679. |
This was offset by the following:
· | Cash distributions received for our unconsolidated joint ventures of $392,013; |
· | Non cash adjustments that increase our cash flow from operations: |
o | loss in unconsolidated joint ventures of $1.1 million. This amount includes our pro-rata share of (1) non cash adjustment for the depreciation and amortization at the property level and (2) any non-recurring acquisition costs incurred in the year we acquired our indirect equity interest in the property; |
o | Non cash adjustment for director’s stock compensation of $56,875; and |
· | Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $465,861. |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Our cash used in investing for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $5.5 million for the acquisition of the indirect equity interests in the real estate properties indicated above.
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Our cash flows from financing consist primarily of proceeds from our ongoing Initial Public Offering and proceeds from affiliate loans less distributions paid to our stockholders. For the year ended December 31, 2010, net cash provided by financing activities was $6.3 million and consisted of the following:
· | $6.2 million of gross offering proceeds related to our Initial Public Offering, net of (1) payments of commissions on sales of common stock and related dealer manager fees in the amount of $565,000, (2) reimbursement of other offering costs to affiliates in the amount of $508,000 and (3) offering costs paid by us directly in the amount of $832,000; |
· | $2.1 million of proceeds from affiliate loans, net of repayments. |
This was offset by $129,374 of net cash distributions, after giving effect to distributions reinvested by stockholders of $63,000.
21 |
Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations
Funds from operations (“FFO”) is a non-GAAP financial measure that is widely recognized as a measure of REIT operating performance. We consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of our operating performance as it is based on a net income analysis of property portfolio performance that excludes non-cash items such as depreciation. The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT, using historical accounting for depreciation, could be less informative. We define FFO, consistent with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREITs”) definition, as net income, computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property and impairment charges, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis.
In addition to FFO, we use modified funds from operations ("Modified Funds from Operations" or "MFFO"), as defined by the Investment Program Association (“IPA”). MFFO excludes from FFO the following items:
(1) | acquisition fees and expenses; |
(2) | straight line rent amounts, both income and expense; |
(3) | amortization of above or below market intangible lease assets and liabilities; |
(4) | amortization of discounts and premiums on debt investments; |
(5) | gains or losses from the early extinguishment of debt; |
(6) | gains or losses on the extinguishment or sales of hedges, foreign exchange, securities and other derivative holdings except where the trading of such instruments is a fundamental attribute of our operations; |
(7) | gains or losses related to fair value adjustments for derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting, including interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives; |
(8) | gains or losses related to consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting; |
(9) | gains or losses related to contingent purchase price adjustments; and |
(10) | adjustments related to the above items for unconsolidated entities in the application of equity accounting. |
We believe that MFFO is helpful in assisting management, investors and analysts assess the sustainability of our operating performance, and in particular, after our offering and acquisition stages are complete primarily because it excludes acquisition expenses that affect property operations only in the period in which the property is acquired. Because we are currently in our offering and acquisition stage, we expect that the exclusion of acquisition expense will be our most significant adjustment for the near future, although no acquisition expenses have been incurred for the year ended December 31, 2011. Thus, MFFO provides helpful information relevant to evaluating the Company’s operating performance in periods in which there is no acquisition activity.
In evaluating investments in real estate, including both business combinations and investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting, management's investment models and analysis differentiate costs to acquire the investment from the operations derived from the investment. Acquisition costs related to business combinations are to be expensed. We believe by excluding expensed acquisition costs, MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of our real estate investments and is consistent with management's analysis of the investing and operating performance of our properties. In addition, it provides investors with information about our operating performance so they can better assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our offering and acquisition stages are completed. Acquisition expenses include those incurred with our Advisor or third parties. Table 1 presents our calculation of FFO and MFFO for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
22 |
Because we have been raising capital in our Initial Public Offering since our inception, did not commence real estate operations until the end of 2009, made several additional equity investments in 2010 and made no investments in 2011, the results presented in Table 1 below are not directly comparable and should not be considered an indication of our future operating performance. Table 2 presents additional information about our MFFO on a property-level basis and presents our calculation of our pro-rata share of MFFO generated by our indirect equity interest in the properties for the year ended December 31, 2011.
TABLE 1 | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net Loss(1) | $ | (4,315,331 | ) | $ | (2,306,870 | ) | ||
Add: | ||||||||
Pro-rata share of unconsolidated JV depreciation and amortization(2) | 1,045,949 | 1,261,477 | ||||||
FFO | (3,269,382 | ) | (1,045,393 | ) | ||||
Add: | ||||||||
Pro-rata share of unconsolidated JV acquisition costs(2) | - | 426,211 | ||||||
Acquisition costs per statement of operations | - | 362,766 | ||||||
Organizational costs | - | 49,931 | ||||||
MFFO | $ | (3,269,382 | ) | $ | (206,485 | ) |
(1) | The net loss for the year ended December 31, 2011 includes $1,646,818 of excess operating expenses approved by our Board of Directors on March 22, 2011 relating to our total operating expenses for the four fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2009 and the four fiscal quarters ended each quarter thereafter through March 31, 2011. |
(2) | This represents our share of depreciation and amortization expense and acquisition costs at the properties that we account for under the equity method of accounting. |
TABLE 2 | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Springhouse | Creekside | Meadowmont | Augusta | Hillsboro | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity (loss) income of unconsolidated JV | $ | (45,237 | ) | $ | (18,268 | ) | $ | (22,166 | ) | $ | 4,691 | $ | 7,315 | $ | (73,665 | ) | ||||||||
Pro-rata share of unconsolidated JV depreciation and amortization | 383,827 | 118,009 | 176,717 | 230,383 | 137,013 | 1,045,949 | ||||||||||||||||||
338,590 | 99,741 | 154,551 | 235,074 | 144,328 | 972,284 | |||||||||||||||||||
Affiliate loan interest, net(1) | (114,608 | ) | - | (8,803 | ) | (135,159 | ) | (87,992 | ) | (346,562 | ) | |||||||||||||
Asset management and oversight fees | (109,688 | ) | (33,214 | ) | (74,110 | ) | (69,330 | ) | (43,814 | ) | (330,156 | ) | ||||||||||||
Corporate operating expenses(2)(3) | (971,006 | ) | (157,876 | ) | (733,724 | ) | (987,349 | ) | (714,993 | ) | (3,564,948 | ) | ||||||||||||
Consolidated MFFO | $ | (856,712 | ) | $ | (91,349 | ) | $ | (662,086 | ) | $ | (956,764 | ) | $ | (702,471 | ) | $ | (3,269,382 | ) |
(1) | Affiliate notes payable expected to be paid from proceeds of the equity raise. |
(2) | Corporate operating expenses have been allocated amongst our portfolio based on the percentage of our investment in the joint venture to our total investments in joint ventures. |
(3) | Corporate operating expenses include $1,646,818 of excess operating expenses approved by our Board of Directors relating to our total operating expenses for the four fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2009 and the four fiscal quarters ended each quarter thereafter through March 31, 2011. |
Operating cash flow, FFO and MFFO may also be used to fund all or a portion of certain capitalizable items that are excluded from FFO and MFFO, such as tenant improvements, building improvements and deferred leasing costs.
Presentation of this information is intended to assist the reader in comparing the sustainability of the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO or MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. FFO or MFFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), as an indication of our liquidity, nor is either indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions. Both FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in connection with other GAAP measurements.
23 |
Provided below is additional information related to selected non-cash items included in net loss above, which may be helpful in assessing our operating results.
· | Directors stock compensation of $68,125 and $56,875 was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
· | Amortization of deferred financing costs paid on behalf of our joint ventures of approximately $10,057 and $35,503 was recognized for years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
Distributions
On January 13, 2011, our Board of Directors declared distributions of $0.00191781 per common share based on daily record dates for the period from January 13, 2011 through March 31, 2011. On March 22, 2011, our Board of Directors declared distributions of $0.00191781 per common share based on daily record dates for the period from April 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011. Additionally, on August 8, 2011, our Board of Directors declared distributions of $0.00191781 per common share based on daily record dates for the period from July 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. Distributions payable to each stockholder of record were or will be paid in cash on or before the 15th day of the following month. A portion of each distribution may constitute a return of capital for tax purposes. We intend to make regular cash distributions to our stockholders, typically on a monthly basis. As current corporate operating expenses exceed cash flow received from our investments in real estate joint ventures we can make no assurance that our Board of Directors will continue to approve monthly distributions at the current rate; however the recently approved distributions and the distributions paid to date represent an amount that, if paid each month for a 12-month period, would equate to a 7.0% annualized rate based on a purchase price of $10.00 per share.
Our Board of Directors will determine the amount of distributions to be distributed to our stockholders. The board’s determination will be based on a number of factors, including funds available from operations, our capital expenditure requirements and the annual distribution requirements necessary to maintain our REIT status under the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, our distribution rate and payment frequency may vary from time to time. However, to qualify as a REIT for tax purposes, we must make distributions equal to at least 90% of our “REIT taxable income” each year. Especially during the early stages of our operations, we may declare distributions in excess of funds from operations.
Distributions paid, cash flows from operations and FFO were as follows:
Distributions Paid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period | Cash | Reinvested | Total | Cash Flow from Operations | Distributions Declared | FFO | ||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter 2011 | $ | 88,927 | $ | 28,113 | $ | 117,040 | $ | (18,644 | ) | $ | 117,538 | $ | (2,091,045 | ) | ||||||||||
Second Quarter 2011 | 83,135 | 46,179 | 129,314 | (510,379 | ) | 134,526 | (461,662 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Third Quarter 2011 | 92,101 | 51,968 | 144,069 | (295,429 | ) | 148,402 | (419,260 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter 2011 | 102,000 | 61,779 | 163,779 | (227,241 | ) | 176,628 | (297,415 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 366,163 | $ | 188,039 | $ | 554,202 | $ | (1,051,693 | ) | $ | 577,094 | $ | (3,269,382 | ) |
Critical Accounting Policies
Below is a discussion of the accounting policies that management believes are critical. We consider these policies critical because they involve significant management judgments and assumptions, require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain and because they are important for understanding and evaluating our reported financial results. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. With different estimates or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported in our consolidated financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.
Accounting for Joint Ventures
We analyze our investments in joint ventures to determine if the joint venture is a variable interest entity (a “VIE”) and would require consolidation. A VIE is an entity that has (i) insufficient equity to permit it to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) equity holders that lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. VIE’s are consolidated by the primary beneficiary, which is the entity that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that potentially could be significant to the entity. Variable interests in a VIE are contractual, ownership, or other financial interests in a VIE that change with changes in the fair value of the VIE’s net assets. We continuously re-assesses whether its interest in the managing member LLC is (i) a VIE, and (ii) if the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE.
24 |
Under the equity method of accounting, our investments in the joint ventures are included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of “Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures”.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. Investments in entities that are VIE’s and where we are not the primary beneficiary, do not control through majority voting interest or where the other owner has substantial participating rights are not consolidated and are reflected as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
We have the following indirect equity interests in unconsolidated joint ventures that own and operate rental properties:
Property | Indirect Equity Interest in Property | |||
Springhouse | 37.50 | % | ||
Creekside | 23.31 | % | ||
Meadowmont | 16.25 | % | ||
Augusta | 25.00 | % | ||
Hillsboro | 12.50 | % |
Our unconsolidated subsidiaries are primarily engaged in the management and operation of multifamily real estate properties. The equity method of accounting (see Critical Accounting Policies) is used for these investments in which we have the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over operating and financial policies. As a result, the assets and liabilities of these joint ventures are not included on our balance sheet. Total assets of our unconsolidated subsidiaries were $133.9 million as of December 31, 2011.
Subsequent Events
Status of the Offering
For the period January 1, 2012 through March 2, 2012, we sold approximately 141,379 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $1,331,168 including issuances through our distribution reinvestment plan.
Distributions Paid
Distributions Declared Daily For Each Day in Month Listed | Date Paid | Total Distribution | Cash Distribution | Dollar amount of Shares Issued pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan | ||||
December 2011 | January 3, 2012 | $63,178 | $38,450 | $24,728 | ||||
January 2012 | February 1, 2012 | $67,095 | $40,637 | $26,458 | ||||
February 2012 | March 1, 2012 | $66,921 | $40,726 | $26,195 |
25 |
Distributions Declared
On March 7, 2012, our Board of Directors declared distributions based on daily record dates for the period from April 1, 2012 through July 31, 2012. Distributions payable to each stockholder of record were or will be paid in cash on or before the 15th day of the following month.
Distributions are calculated based on stockholders of record per day during the period at a rate of $0.00191781 per share per day and equal a daily amount that, if paid each day for a 365-day period, would equal a 7.0% annualized rate based on a purchase price of $10.00 per share.
Extension of Meadowmont Affiliate Loan
Pursuant to the terms of that certain Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement dated January 20, 2012 (the “Meadowmont Modification Agreement”), BEMT Meadowmont, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Holdings, L.P., of which we are the general partner, extended the maturity date of its $500,000 line of credit (the “Meadowmont Affiliate Loan”) from Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC, an affiliate of our sponsor. Under the terms of the Meadowmont Affiliate Loan, BEMT Meadowmont, LLC may borrow, from time to time, up to $500,000, for general working capital. The maturity date of the Meadowmont Affiliate Loan was previously extended to January 20, 2012. The Meadowmont Modification Agreement extends the maturity date of the Meadowmont Affiliate Loan to July 20, 2012. All other terms of the Meadowmont Affiliate Loan remain unchanged.
Extension of Augusta Affiliate Loan
Pursuant to the terms of that certain Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement dated February 28, 2012 (the “Augusta Modification Agreement”), BEMT Augusta, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Holdings, L.P., of which we are the general partner, extended the maturity date of its $1,931,484.17 affiliate loan (the “Augusta Affiliate Loan”) from Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC, an affiliate of our sponsor. The Augusta Affiliate Loan is related to our investment in the joint venture through which it acquired the 240-unit multifamily community known as the Estates at Perimeter (formerly known as St. Andrews Apartments) located in Augusta, Georgia. The maturity date of the Augusta Affiliate Loan was previously extended from February 28, 2011 to August 31, 2011 and again from August 31, 2011 to February 28, 2012. The Augusta Modification Agreement further extends the maturity date of the Augusta Affiliate Loan from February 28, 2012 to August 31, 2012. All other terms of the Augusta Affiliate Loan remain unchanged.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We have omitted a discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk because, as a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide such information.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The information required by this Item 8 is hereby included in our Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) and Rule 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of December 31, 2011, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2011, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in this report filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Exchange Act and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
26 |
We believe, however, that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls systems are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud or error, if any, within a company have been detected.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of December 31, 2011, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2011, were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
Sponsor’s Agreement to Provide Us Financial Support and to Defer Payment of Certain Fees
On March 13, 2012, our sponsor, Bluerock Real Estate, LLC, confirmed its agreement to provide financial support to us sufficient for us to satisfy all of our obligations and debt service requirements as they come due until at least January 1, 2013 and will satisfy, on a timely basis, all of our liabilities and obligations that we are unable to satisfy when due from March 13, 2012, through and including January 1, 2013. In addition, our sponsor has agreed to defer payment of current year property and asset management fees and operating expenses that are allocated to us, acquisition fees, property and asset management fees and other costs, and operating expenses which have been accrued as of December 31, 2011, and offering costs advanced on our behalf. In addition, our sponsor, which has management control of the affiliates that are lenders to us, has the authority to extend and will extend the notes beyond December 31, 2012, depending on our ability to repay those obligations.
Declaration of Distribution
On November 7, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized distributions payable to the stockholders of record each day for January 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012. Distributions payable to each stockholder of record will be paid in cash on or before the 15th day of the following month. The declared distributions equal a daily amount of $0.00191781 per share of common stock. If this rate were paid each day for a 365-day period, it would equal a 7% annualized rate based on a purchase price of $10.00 per share. A portion of each distribution may constitute a return of capital for tax purposes.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Our Executive Officers and Directors
The individuals listed as our executive officers below also serve as officers and employees of our Advisor. As executive officers of the Advisor, they manage our day-to-day affairs and carry out the directives of our Board of Directors in the review, selection and recommendation of investment opportunities, and operating our acquisitions and monitoring the performance of those acquisitions to ensure that they are consistent with our investment objectives. The duties our executive officers perform on our behalf, on the other hand, will not involve the review, selection and recommendation of investment opportunities, but rather the performance of corporate governance activities on our behalf that require the attention of one of our corporate officers, including signing certifications required under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, for filing with the our periodic reports. All of the individuals listed below as our directors have terms expiring on the date of the 2012 annual meeting or until his or her successor is elected and qualified.
27 |
Name* | Age** | Position | Year First Became Director | |||
R. Ramin Kamfar | 48 | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | 2008 | |||
James G. Babb, III | 47 | President, Chief Investment Officer and Director | 2008 | |||
Jordan B. Ruddy | 49 | Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | N/A | |||
Jerold E. Novack | 56 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | N/A | |||
Michael L. Konig | 51 | Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel | N/A | |||
Brian D. Bailey | 45 | Independent Director | 2009 | |||
I. Bobby Majumder | 43 | Independent Director | 2009 | |||
Romano Tio | 52 | Independent Director | 2009 |
* The address of each executive officer and director listed is Heron Tower, 70 East 55th Street, 9th Floor, New York, New York 10022.
** As of March 2, 2012.
R. Ramin Kamfar, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Kamfar serves as our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and is the Chief Executive Officer of our Advisor. He has also served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Bluerock Real Estate, LLC (“Bluerock”) since its inception in October 2002. Mr. Kamfar has approximately 20 years of experience in building operating companies, and in various aspects of real estate, mergers and acquisitions, private equity investing, investment banking, public and private financings, and retail operations.
From 1988 to 1993, Mr. Kamfar worked as an investment banker at Lehman Brothers Inc., New York, New York, where he specialized in mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance and private placements. From 1993 to 2002, Mr. Kamfar was the CEO and Chairman of New World Restaurant Group, Inc. (now known as Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc (NASDAQ: BAGL)), a company he founded and grew through a consolidation and turnaround of several companies to approximately 800 locations and $400 million in gross revenues and a portfolio of brands which included Einstein Bros. ® and Noah’s NY Bagels ®. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Kamfar served as an active investor, advisor and member of the Board of Directors of Vsource, Inc., a technology company subsequently sold to Symphony House (KL: SYMPHNY), a leading business process outsourcing company focused on the Fortune 500 and Global 500. Mr. Kamfar received an M.B.A. degree with distinction in Finance in 1988 from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and a B.S. degree with distinction in Finance in 1985 from the University of Maryland located in College Park, Maryland.
James G. Babb, III, President and Chief Investment Officer. Mr. Babb serves as our President and Chief Investment Officer and is on our Board of Directors, and is the President and Chief Investment Officer of our Advisor. Mr. Babb is also the Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Bluerock, which he joined in July 2007. He oversees all real estate sourcing, diligence, structuring and acquisitions for Bluerock. He has been involved exclusively in real estate acquisition, management, financing and disposition for more than 20 years, primarily on behalf of investment funds since 1992.
From 1992 to August 2003, Mr. Babb helped lead the residential and office acquisitions initiatives for Starwood Capital Group, or Starwood Capital, most recently as a Senior Vice President. Starwood Capital was formed in 1992 and during his tenure raised and invested funds on behalf of institutional investors through seven private real estate funds, each of which had investment objectives similar to ours (but not limited to multifamily investments), and which in the aggregate ultimately invested approximately $8 billion in approximately 250 separate transactions. During such period, Mr. Babb led or shared investment responsibility for over 75 investment transactions totaling approximately $2.5 billion of asset value in more than 20 million square feet of residential, office and industrial properties located in 25 states and seven foreign countries, including a significant number of transactions that were contributed to the initial public offering of Equity Residential Properties Trust (NYSE: EQR), and to create iStar Financial Inc. (NYSE: SFI). Mr. Babb was also active in Starwood Capital’s efforts to expand its platform to invest in Europe. From August 2003 to July 2007, Mr. Babb founded his own principal investment company, Bluepoint Capital, LLC. Bluepoint was a private real estate investment company focused on the acquisition, development and/or redevelopment of residential and commercial properties in the Northeast United States and Western Europe. Mr. Babb received a B.A. degree in Economics in 1987 from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
28 |
Jordan B. Ruddy, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Jordan Ruddy serves as the Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of our company and of our Advisor. Mr. Ruddy is also the President and Chief Operating Officer for Bluerock, which he joined in 2002. Mr. Ruddy has 20 years of experience in real estate acquisitions, financings, management and dispositions.
From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Ruddy served as an investment banker at Banc of America Securities LLC, where he was responsible for various types of real estate investment banking transactions including equity offerings, debt placements and asset sales. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Ruddy served as Vice President of Amerimar Enterprises, a real estate company specializing in value-added investments nationwide, where he managed acquisitions, financings, leasing, asset management and dispositions involving over 1,500,000 square feet of commercial and multifamily real estate. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Ruddy served as an investment banker at Smith Barney Inc., where he was responsible for various types of real estate investment banking transactions including equity offerings, debt placements and asset sales. From 1988 to 1993, Mr. Ruddy served in the real estate department of The Chase Manhattan Bank, most recently as a Second Vice President. Mr. Ruddy received an M.B.A. degree in Finance and Real Estate in 1995 from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and a B.S. degree with high honors in Economics in 1986 from the London School of Economics, located in London, England.
Jerold E. Novack, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Novack serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of our company and our Advisor. Mr. Novack has also served as the Senior Vice President — Chief Financial Officer of Bluerock since October 2004. Mr. Novack has over 25 years of experience in public and private financings, operations and management.
From June 1994 to April 2002, Mr. Novack served in senior financial positions of New World Restaurant Group, Inc. (now known as Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: BAGL)), including as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From 1982 to 1993, Mr. Novack held various senior financial positions at several specialty retail chains, including Mercantile Department Stores and Brooks Fashion Stores. Mr. Novack received a B.S. degree in Accounting in 1976 from Brooklyn College, City University of New York.
Michael L. Konig, Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel. Mr. Konig serves as the Senior Vice President and General Counsel of our company and our Advisor. Mr. Konig has also served as counsel for Bluerock and its affiliates since December 2004. Mr. Konig has over 20 years of experience in law and business.
From 1987 to 1997, Mr. Konig was an attorney at the firms of Greenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis and Ravin Sarasohn Cook Baumgarten Fisch & Baime, representing borrowers and lenders in numerous financing transactions, primarily involving real estate, distressed real estate and Chapter 11 reorganizations, as well with respect to a broad variety of litigation and corporate law matters. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Konig served as legal counsel, including as General Counsel, at New World Restaurant Group, Inc. (now known as Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: BAGL)). From 2002 to December 2004, Mr. Konig served as Senior Vice President of Roma Food Enterprises, Inc. where he led operations and the restructuring and sale of the privately held company with approximately $300 million in annual revenues. Mr. Konig received a J.D. degree cum laude in 1987 from California Western School of Law, located in San Diego, California, and an M.B.A. degree in Finance in 1988 from San Diego State University.
Brian D. Bailey, Independent Director. Mr. Bailey has served as one of our independent directors since January 2009. Mr. Bailey has more than 15 years of experience in sourcing, evaluating, structuring and managing private investments, as well as 8 years of experience with real estate and real estate-related debt financing.
Mr. Bailey founded and currently serves as the Managing Member of Carmichael Partners, LLC, a private equity investment firm based in Charlotte, North Carolina. From December 2008 to December 2009, Mr. Bailey served as a Senior Advisor of Carousel Capital, LLC, a private equity investment firm. From April 2000 to December 2008, Mr. Bailey served as a Managing Partner of Carousel Capital. Since its inception, Carousel has made portfolio investments in more than 25 operating companies and has completed numerous additional acquisitions and financings related to these portfolio companies, including sale leaseback transactions, and has utilized such financings in several of its investments. Mr. Bailey’s duties at Carousel Capital included sourcing and evaluating investment opportunities, managing the firm’s investment process, serving on the firm’s Investment Committee, managing the firm’s fundraising efforts and communications with its limited partners and Board of Advisors, and serving as a director on the boards of certain portfolio companies, some of which have meaningful real estate assets on their balance sheets. Thus, Mr. Bailey has been involved in the management of numerous real estate issues over the course of his involvement with such portfolio companies. From 1999 to 2000, Mr. Bailey was a team member of Forstmann Little & Co., a private equity firm in New York, New York. From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Bailey was a Principal at the Carlyle Group, a global private equity firm in Washington, D.C. Earlier in his career, Mr. Bailey worked in the leveraged buyout group at CS First Boston in New York, New York and in the mergers and acquisitions group at Bowles Hollowell Conner & Company in Charlotte, North Carolina. Mr. Bailey has also worked in the public sector, as Assistant to the Deputy Chief of Staff and Special Assistant to the President at the White House from 1994 to 1996 and as Director of Strategic Planning and Policy at the U.S. Small Business Administration in 1994. He currently serves as a director of the Telecommunications Development Fund, a private equity investment fund headquartered in Washington, DC, and as a trustee at the North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics. Mr. Bailey received a B.A. degree in Mathematics and Economics in 1988 from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and an M.B.A. degree in 1992 from the Stanford Graduate School of Business, located in Stanford, California.
29 |
I. Bobby Majumder, Independent Director. Mr. Majumder has served as one of our independent directors since January 2009. Mr. Majumder became a partner at the law firm of K&L Gates LLP in May 2005, where he specializes in corporate and securities transactions with an emphasis on the representation of underwriters, placement agents and issuers in both public and private offerings, private investment in public equity (PIPE) transactions and venture capital and private equity funds.
From January 2000 to April 2005, Mr. Majumder was a partner at the firm of Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP. Through his law practice, Mr. Majumder has gained significant experience relating to the acquisition of a number of types of real property assets including raw land, improved real estate and oil and gas interests. He is an active member of the Park Cities Rotary Club, a charter member of the Dallas Chapter of The Indus Entrepreneurs and an Associates Board member of the Cox School of Business at Southern Methodist University. Mr. Majumder received a J.D. degree in 1993 from Washington and Lee University School of Law, located in Lexington, Virginia, and a B.A. degree in 1990 from Trinity University, located in San Antonio, Texas.
Romano Tio, Independent Director. Mr. Tio has served as one of our independent directors since January 2009. Mr. Tio serves as Managing Director at RM Capital Management LLC, a boutique investment and advisory firm focused on investing in distressed commercial mortgages at discounts that provide attractive risk adjusted returns. From January 2008 to May 2009, Mr. Tio served as a Managing Director and co-head of the commercial real estate efforts of HCP Real Estate Investors, LLC, an affiliate of Harbinger Capital Partners Funds, a $10+ billion private investment firm specializing in event/distressed strategies. From August 2003 until December 2007, Mr. Tio was a Managing Director at Carlton Group Ltd., a boutique real estate investment banking firm where he was involved in over $2.5 billion worth of commercial real estate transactions. Earlier in his career, Mr. Tio was involved in real estate sales and brokerage for 25 years. Mr. Tio received a B.S. degree in Biochemistry in 1982 from Hofstra University located in Hempstead, New York.
Selection of Directors
In determining the composition of our Board of Directors, our goal was to assemble a group of individuals of sound character, judgment and business acumen, whose varied backgrounds, leadership experience and real estate experience would complement each other to bring a diverse set of skills and perspectives to the board.
Mr. Kamfar, who controls our sponsor, was chosen to serve as the Chairman of the Board because, as our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Kamfar is well positioned to provide essential insight and guidance to the board from the inside perspective of the day-to-day operations of the company. Furthermore, Mr. Kamfar brings to the board approximately 20 years of experience in building operating companies, and in various aspects of real estate, mergers and acquisitions, private equity investing, public and private financings, and retail operations. His experience with complex financial and operational issues in the real estate industry, as well as his strong leadership ability and business acumen make him critical to proper functioning of our board.
Our Board of Directors selected Mr. Babb to serve as one of our directors because of his extensive expertise in real estate acquisition, management, finance and disposition. With more than 20 years of experience investing in and managing real estate investments, Mr. Babb offers key insights and perspective with respect to our real estate portfolio. As one of our executive officers and the Chief Investment Officer of our Advisor, Mr. Babb also informs and advises the board with respect to the critical operational issues facing our company.
Our Board of Directors selected Mr. Bailey as one of our independent directors to leverage his extensive experience in sourcing, evaluating, structuring and managing private equity investments and his experience related to real estate and real-estate related debt financing. In addition, Mr. Bailey’s prior service on the audit committees of numerous privately held companies provides him with the requisite skills and knowledge to serve effectively on our audit committee.
30 |
Our Board of Directors selected Mr. Majumder as one of our independent directors due to his depth of legal experience in advising clients with respect to corporate and securities transactions, including representations of underwriters, placement agents and issuers in both public and private offerings. Mr. Majumder also brings with him significant legal experience relating to the acquisition of a number of types of real estate assets.
Our Board of Directors selected Mr. Tio as one of our independent directors as a result of his demonstrated leadership skill and industry-specific experience developed through a number of high-level management positions with investment and advisory firms specialized in the commercial real estate sector.
Code of Ethics and Whistleblower Policy
Our Board of Directors adopted a Code of Ethics, Whistleblower Policy, and Corporate Governance Guidelines on January 14, 2009 that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller and persons performing similar functions and all members of our Board of Directors. We believe these policies are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct; full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in our reporting to our stockholders and the SEC; compliance with applicable laws; reporting of violations of the code; and accountability for adherence to the code. Copies of our Code of Ethics, Whistleblower Policy, and Corporate Governance Guidelines are filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Compensation of Executive Officers
We are externally managed by our Advisor and have no employees; therefore, we do not pay compensation directly to our named executive officers. Pursuant to our advisory agreement we pay our Advisor certain fees and reimburse certain expenses. See “Certain Transactions with Related Persons” below. Included in the expenses for which we reimburse our Advisor are compensation reimbursements for the portion of certain of our named executive officers’ salaries and benefits allocated to us for their services related to our operations. We do not reimburse compensation expenses to the extent such individuals perform services in transactions for which our Advisor receives an acquisition fee, origination fee or disposition fee.
For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we are obligated to reimburse our Advisor for compensation amounts it paid to our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer for services rendered on our behalf. The amounts we are obligated to reimburse to our Advisor for compensation paid to our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer were less than $100,000, and since we reimbursed no amounts related to our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, as a smaller reporting company we have omitted a discussion of compensation paid to our executive officers. To the extent necessary to discharge any board responsibilities in the future relating to compensation of our executives, our board intends to appoint a compensation committee composed of our independent directors. Officers will be eligible for awards under our Incentive Plan, however, we currently do not intend to grant any such awards, and no awards have been granted to our executive officers under our Incentive Plan.
Compensation of Directors
If a director is also one of our executive officers, we do not pay any compensation for services rendered as a director. The amount and form of compensation payable to our independent directors for their service to us is determined by our Board of Directors, based upon recommendations from our Advisor. Two of our executive officers, Messrs. Kamfar and Babb, manage and control our Advisor, and through the Advisor, they are involved in recommending and setting the compensation to be paid to our independent directors.
31 |
We have provided below certain information regarding compensation earned by and paid to our directors during fiscal year 2011.
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash in | Restricted Stock Awards(2) | Total | |||||||||
Brian D. Bailey | $ | 34,500 | $ | 20,000 | $ | 54,500 | ||||||
I. Bobby Majumder | 34,500 | 20,000 | 54,500 | |||||||||
Romano Tio | 34,500 | 20,000 | 54,500 | |||||||||
R. Ramin Kamfar(3) | - | - | - | |||||||||
James G. Babb, III(3) | - | - | - |
(1) | Includes seven $1,000 payments related to joint Board of Directors/audit committee teleconference meetings held during 2011, one $2,500 payment for the board meeting attended, and the $25,000 annual retainer paid in 2011, which retainer also compensated for services to be rendered in 2012 in the amount of $8,333. |
(2) | Value of vested portion of October 15, 2009, March 15, 2010 and August 8, 2011 restricted stock grants as of March 2, 2012. |
(3) | Directors who are also our executive officers do not receive compensation for services rendered as a director. |
We pay each of our independent directors:
· | an annual retainer of $25,000; |
· | $2,500 for each board meeting attended; |
· | $2,000 for each committee meeting attended; and |
· | $1,000 for each teleconference meeting of the board or any committee. |
All directors receive reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors.
We have approved and adopted an independent directors’ compensation plan, which operates as a sub-plan of our Incentive Plan. Under the independent directors compensation plan and subject to such plan’s conditions and restrictions, each of our current independent directors received 5,000 shares of restricted stock on October 15, 2009, the date our offering was declared effective by the SEC. Going forward, each new independent director that joins the board will receive 5,000 shares of restricted stock upon election or appointment to the board. In addition, on the date following an independent director’s re-election to the board, he or she will receive 2,500 shares of restricted stock. Restricted stock will vest as to 20% of the shares on the date of grant and as to 20% of the shares on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the restricted stock will become fully vested on the earlier occurrence of (1) the termination of the grantee’s service as a director due to his or her death, disability or termination without cause or (2) the occurrence of a change in our control.
32 |
Item 12. | Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management And Related Stockholder Matters |
Stock Ownership
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 2, 2012, for each person or group that holds more than 5% of our common stock, for each director and executive officer and for our directors and executive officers as a group:
Name of Beneficial Owner(1) | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(2) | Percent of All Shares | ||||||
R. Ramin Kamfar(3) | 24,089 | 2.16 | % | |||||
James G. Babb, III | - | - | ||||||
Jordan B. Ruddy | - | - | ||||||
Jerold E. Novak | - | - | ||||||
Michael L. Konig | - | - | ||||||
Brian D. Bailey | 10,917 | 0.98 | ||||||
I. Bobby Majumder | 10,300 | 0.92 | ||||||
Romano Tio | 10,344 | 0.93 | ||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group | 55,650 | 4.99 | % |
(1) | The address of each beneficial owner listed is Heron Tower, 70 East 55th Street, 9th Floor, New York, New York 10022. |
(2) | None of the shares are pledged as security. |
(3) | As of March 2, 2012, BER Holdings, LLC owned 23,089 shares of our common stock, all of which is issued and outstanding stock, and our Advisor owned 1,000 shares of convertible stock, all of which is issued and outstanding. Our Advisor is controlled by BER Holdings, LLC, which is controlled by Mr. Kamfar. Thus, Mr. Kamfar has the power to direct how BER Holdings, LLC votes its shares of common stock. |
Equity Compensation Plan
We have adopted the Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the Incentive Plan, in order to enable us to (1) provide an incentive to our employees, officers, directors, and consultants and employees and officers of our Advisor to increase the value of our common stock, (2) give such persons a stake in our future that corresponds to the stake of each of our stockholders, and (3) obtain or retain the services of these persons who are considered essential to our long-term success, by offering such persons an opportunity to participate in our growth through ownership of our common stock or through other equity-related awards. We intend to issue awards only to our independent directors under our Incentive Plan (which awards will be granted under the independent director’s compensation plan). We have reserved and authorized an aggregate number of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under the Incentive Plan.
33 |
The following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under our incentive award plan, as of December 31, 2011:
Plan Category | Number of Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights | Weighted- Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | - | - | 1,970,000 | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | - | - | - | |||||||||
Total | - | - | 1,970,000 |
We have granted each of our independent directors 5,000 shares of restricted stock as of the commencement of the Initial Public Offering on October 15, 2009, and 2,500 shares of restricted stock as of their reelection to the Board of Directors on March 15, 2010 and again on August 8, 2011. The restricted stock vests as to 20% of the shares on the date of grant and as to 20% of the shares on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of the grant thereafter.
Item 13. Certain Relationships And Related Transactions And Director Independence
Director Independence
Although our shares are not listed for trading on any national securities exchange, a majority of the members of our Board of Directors, and all of the members of the audit committee are “independent.” An “independent” director is a person who is not one of our officers or employees or an officer or employee of our Advisor or its affiliates and has not been so for the previous two years. Serving as a director of, or having an ownership interest in, another program sponsored by Bluerock will not, by itself, preclude independent director status. The Board of Directors has determined that Brian D. Bailey, I. Bobby Majumder and Romano Tio each satisfy these criteria. None of these directors has ever served as (or is related to) an employee of ours or any of our predecessors or acquired companies or received or earned any compensation from us or any such other entities except for compensation directly related to service as a director of us. Therefore, we believe that all of these directors are independent directors.
Certain Transactions with Related Persons
As described further below, we have entered into agreements with certain affiliates pursuant to which they will provide services to us. Our independent directors have reviewed the material transactions between our affiliates and us since the beginning of 2011 as well as any such currently proposed transactions. Set forth below is a description of such transactions and the independent directors’ determination of their fairness.
Our Relationship with Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Advisor, LLC (our Advisor)
R. Ramin Kamfar, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, indirectly owns BER Holdings, LLC, the sole owner of our Advisor. Mr. Kamfar actively participates in the management and operations of the Advisor. Since our inception, our Advisor has provided day-to-day management of our business. Among the services provided by our advisor under the terms of the advisory agreement are the following:
· | finding, presenting and recommending to us real estate investment opportunities consistent with our investment policies and objectives; |
· | structuring the terms and conditions of our real estate investments, sales and joint ventures; |
· | acquiring properties and other investments on our behalf in compliance with our investment objectives and policies; |
· | sourcing and structuring our loan originations; |
· | arranging for financing and refinancing of properties and our other investments; |
· | entering into leases and service contracts for our properties; |
· | supervising and evaluating each property manager’s performance; |
34 |
· | reviewing and analyzing the properties’ operating and capital budgets; |
· | assisting us in obtaining insurance; |
· | generating an annual budget for us; |
· | reviewing and analyzing financial information for each of our assets and the overall portfolio; |
· | formulating and overseeing the implementation of strategies for the administration, promotion, management, operation, maintenance, improvement, financing and refinancing, marketing, leasing and disposition of our properties and other investments; |
· | performing investor-relations services; |
· | maintaining our accounting and other records and assisting us in filing all reports required to be filed with the SEC, the IRS and other regulatory agencies; |
· | engaging and supervising the performance of our agents, including our registrar and transfer agent; and |
· | performing any other services reasonably requested by us. |
Our Advisor is subject to the supervision of our Board of Directors and only has such authority as we may delegate to it as our agent. The Advisory Agreement had an initial term of one year, expiring October 14, 2011, and was renewable for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon the mutual consent of our Advisory and us. On October 14, 2011, we renewed the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor, extending the Advisory Agreement through October 14, 2012. The advisory agreement may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon the mutual consent of our Advisor and us. Additionally, either party may terminate the advisory agreement without penalty upon 60 days’ written notice and, in such event, our Advisor must cooperate with us and our directors in making an orderly transition of the advisory function. We have compensated our Advisor pursuant to the advisory agreement as set forth below.
Our Advisor or its affiliates may pay some of our organization and offering costs (other than selling commissions and dealer manager fees) incurred in connection with our ongoing public offering, including our legal, accounting, printing, mailing and filing fees. We reimburse our Advisor for these costs, but only to the extent that the reimbursement would not cause selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and other organization and offering expenses borne by us to exceed 15% of the gross offering proceeds of our ongoing Initial Public Offering. In addition, our Advisor is obligated to reimburse us to the extent selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and other organization and offering costs incurred by us in the offering exceed 15% of gross offering proceeds. As of December 31, 2011, approximately $2.97 million of organizational and offering costs have been incurred on our behalf. We are liable to reimburse these costs only to the extent selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and other organization and offering costs do not exceed 15% of the gross proceeds of the Initial Public Offering. When recorded by us, organizational costs are expensed and third-party offering costs are charged to shareholders’ equity. Organizational and offering costs will be reimbursed from the gross proceeds of the offering. As of December 31, 2011, approximately $49,931 of organizational costs have been expensed in 2010 and were included in general and administrative expense and approximately $2.26 million of offering costs have been charged to shareholders equity.
We incur acquisition fees payable to our Advisor equal to 1.75% of the cost of our acquired investments, including acquisition expenses and any debt attributable to such investments. With respect to investments in and originations of loans, in lieu of an acquisition fee we pay our Advisor an origination fee equal to 1.75% of the amount funded by us to acquire or originate mortgage, mezzanine, bridge or other loans, including any expenses related to such investment and any debt we use to fund the acquisition or origination of the loan. Acquisition and origination fees relate to services provided in connection with the selection and acquisition or origination of real estate and real estate-related investments. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we incurred no acquisition fees as no properties were purchased. Acquisition fees totaled approximately $362,766 and $191,953, respectively for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, which were expensed when incurred. We paid no origination fees during the periods.
In addition to acquisition and origination fees, we reimburse our Advisor for amounts that it pays in connection with the selection, acquisition or development of a property or the selection and acquisition or origination of a real estate-related investment, whether or not we ultimately acquire the asset. From January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, our Advisor and its affiliates did not incur any such costs.
For asset management services, we pay our advisor a monthly fee equal to one-twelfth of 1.0% of the higher of the cost or value of each asset, where cost excludes acquisition fees and expenses but includes any debt attributable to the asset, as well as any costs we expend to develop, construct or improve an asset and where value is the fair market value established by an independent valuation report. However, 50% of the asset management fee will not be payable until stockholders have received distributions in an amount equal to at least a 6.0% per annum cumulative, non-compounded return. As of June 1, 2010, we had satisfied this requirement and 100% of the asset management fee is payable. Asset management and oversight fees totaled approximately $330,156, $223,436 and $9,140, respectively for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 and were expensed when incurred.
35 |
Under our advisory agreement our Advisor and its affiliates have the right to seek reimbursement from us for all costs and expenses they incur in connection with their provision of services to us, including our allocable share of our Advisor’s overhead, such as rent, employee costs, utilities and information technology costs. We do not, however, reimburse our Advisor for personnel costs in connection with services for which our Advisor receives acquisition, origination or disposition fees or for personnel costs related to the salaries of our executive officers. Our charter limits our total operating expenses at the end of four preceding fiscal quarters to the greater of (A) 2% of our average invested assets, or (B) 25% of our net income determined (1) without reductions for any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves and (2) excluding any gain from the sale of our assets for the period unless a majority or our independent directors determines that such expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. From January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011, the Advisor and its affiliates incurred approximately $677,415 of operating expenses on our behalf. Due to the limitations discussed above and because operating expenses incurred directly by us have exceeded the 2% threshold the amount due to the Advisor had not been recorded on our income statement as of December 31, 2010. Further, $973,607 had been recorded as a receivable from the Advisor as of December 31, 2010 for the excess operating expenses over the 2% threshold. Our Board of Directors, including all of its independent directors, reviewed the total operating expenses for the four fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2009 (and the four fiscal quarters ended each quarter after) and an estimate of our total operating expenses for the four fiscal quarters to end March 31, 2011 and unanimously determined the excess amount to be justified because of the costs of operating a public company in its early stage of operation. Upon approval of these costs on March 22, 2011, $1,646,818 of these costs were expensed and $677,415 became a liability to us, payable to our Advisor and its affiliates. As the Board of Directors has previously approved such expenses, all 2011 operating expenses have been and will be expensed as incurred. As of December 31, 2011, $4,204 has been reimbursed to the Advisor and the Advisor has agreed to defer further repayment of these costs until a later date.
The independent directors reviewed our relationship with our Advisor during 2010 and considered it to be fair. The independent directors believe that the amounts payable to the Advisor under the advisory agreement are similar to those paid by other publicly offered, unlisted, externally advised REITs and that this compensation is necessary in order for the Advisor to provide the desired level of services to us and our stockholders.
Other Services Provided by Affiliates
In addition to the services described above to be provided by our Advisor and its affiliates, affiliates of our Advisor may provide other property-level services to our company and may receive compensation for such services, including leasing, loan servicing, property tax reduction and risk management fees. However, under no circumstances will such compensation exceed an amount that would be paid to non-affiliated third parties for similar services. A majority of the independent directors must approve all compensation for such other services paid to our Advisor or any of its affiliates.
Sponsor’s Agreement to Provide Us Financial Support and to Defer Payment of Certain Fees
On March 13, 2012, our sponsor, Bluerock Real Estate, LLC, confirmed its agreement to provide financial support to us sufficient for us to satisfy all of our obligations and debt service requirements as they come due until at least January 1, 2013 and will satisfy, on a timely basis, all of our liabilities and obligations that we are unable to satisfy when due from March 13, 2012, through and including January 1, 2013. In addition, our sponsor has agreed to defer payment of current year property and asset management fees and operating expenses that are allocated to us, acquisition fees, property and asset management fees and other costs, and operating expenses which have been accrued as of December 31, 2011, and offering costs advanced on our behalf. In addition, our sponsor, which has management control of the affiliates that are lenders to us, has the authority to extend and will extend the notes beyond December 31, 2012, depending on our ability to repay those obligations.
Transition to Affiliated Dealer Manager
On July 5, 2011, we provided our former dealer manager, Select Capital Corporation (“Select Capital”), with notice that it considers the Dealer Manager Agreement with Select Capital entered into on October 15, 2009 to have been terminated, effective immediately. In addition, on July 5, 2011, we entered into a dealer manager agreement with Bluerock Capital Markets, LLC (“Bluerock Capital Markets”), our affiliate, pursuant to which it assumed dealer manager responsibilities for the remainder of the Initial Public Offering. The dealer manager is responsible for marketing the Company’s shares in the Initial Public Offering.
36 |
Affiliate Loans
In connection with our investment in the Springhouse joint venture, on December 3, 2009, BEMT Springhouse LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership (“BEMT Springhouse”), entered into a loan agreement with Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund (“BEMT Co-Investor”) pursuant to which BEMT Springhouse borrowed $2.8 million (the “BEMT Co-Investor Springhouse Loan”). The BEMT Co-Investor Springhouse Loan initially had a six-month term, maturing June 3, 2010, which was subsequently extended to December 3, 2010 and again to June 3, 2011, and again to December 3, 2011. On December 3, 2011, BEMT Springhouse entered into a Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement (the “Springhouse Agreement”) with BEMT Co-Investor to extend the maturity date of the BEMT Co-Investor Springhouse Loan for an additional six-month period, to June 3, 2012. A partial repayment in the amount of $1.1 million was made on June 23, 2010. An additional partial repayment in the amount of $1.0 million was made on December 29, 2011. It bears interest compounding monthly at a rate of 30-day LIBOR + 5.00%, subject to a minimum rate of 7.00%, annualized. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2009, the interest rate on the BEMT Co-Investor Springhouse Loan was 7.00%. Interest on the loan will be paid on a current basis from cash flow distributed to us from BR Springhouse Managing Member, LLC (the “Springhouse Managing Member JV Entity”). The BEMT Co-Investor Springhouse Loan is secured by a pledge of our indirect membership interest in the Springhouse property and a pledge of BEMT Springhouse’s membership interest in the Springhouse Managing Member JV Entity.
In connection with our investment in the Meadowmont joint venture, on January 20, 2011, BEMT Meadowmont, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership (“BEMT Meadowmont”) entered into an agreement with Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, an affiliate of the Company’s sponsor (“SOIF II”) for a line of credit represented by a promissory note (the “Note”). Under the terms of the Note, BEMT Meadowmont was authorized to borrow, from time to time, up to $500,000, for general working capital (the “BEMT Co-Investor II Meadowmont Loan”). The BEMT Co-Investor II Meadowmont Loan had a six-month term, maturing on July 20, 2011, was subsequently extended to January 20, 2012 and again to July 20, 2012. It bears interest compounding monthly at a rate of 30-day LIBOR + 5.00%, subject to a minimum rate of 7.00%, annualized. Interest on the loan was paid on a current basis from cash flow distributed to us from BR Meadowmont JV Member, LLC (the “Meadowmont JV Member”). The BEMT Co-Investor II Meadowmont Loan was secured by a pledge of our indirect membership interest in the Meadowmont Property and a pledge of our direct membership interest in the Meadowmont JV Member. The BEMT Co-Investor II Meadowmont Loan plus accrued interest was paid in full on November 22, 2011.
In connection with our investment in the Augusta joint venture, on September 1, 2010, BEMT Augusta LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership (“BEMT Augusta”), entered into a loan agreement with BEMT Co-Investor pursuant to which it borrowed $1.9 million (the “BEMT Co-Investor Augusta Loan”), in connection with the Augusta Property closing. The BEMT Co-Investor Augusta Loan initially had a six-month term with a three month extension. The initial maturity date was February 28, 2011, and was subsequently extended to August 31, 2011. On August 31, 2011, BEMT Augusta entered into a Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement (the “Augusta Agreement”) with BEMT Co-Investor II to further extend the maturity date of the BEMT Co-Investor II Augusta Loan for an additional six-month period from August 31, 2011 to February 28, 2012 and again to August 28, 2012. The BEMT Co-Investor II Augusta Loan may be prepaid without penalty. It bears interest compounding monthly at a rate of 30-day LIBOR + 5.00%, subject to a minimum rate of 7.00%, annualized. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the interest rate on the BEMT Co-Investor II Augusta Loan was 7.00%. Interest on the BEMT Co-Investor II Augusta Loan will be paid on a current basis from cash flow distributed to us from the Augusta Managing Member JV Entity. The BEMT Co-Investor Augusta Loan is secured by a pledge of our indirect membership interest in the Augusta property and a pledge of BEMT Augusta’s membership interest in the Augusta Managing Member JV Entity.
37 |
In connection with our investment in the Hillsboro joint venture, on September 30, 2010, BEMT Hillsboro, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership (“BEMT Hillsboro”), entered into a loan agreement with BEMT Co-Investor II pursuant to which it borrowed $1.3 million (the “BEMT Co-Investor II Hillsboro Loan”). The BEMT Co-Investor II Hillsboro Loan had a six-month term with a three month extension. The initial maturity date was March 31, 2011, and was subsequently extended to September 30, 2011. On September 30, 2011, BEMT Hillsboro entered into a Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement (the “Hillsboro Agreement”) with BEMT Co-Investor II to further extend the maturity date of the BEMT Co-Investor II Hillsboro Loan for an additional six-month period to March 31, 2012. The BEMT Co-Investor II Hillsboro Loan may be prepaid without penalty. It bears interest compounding monthly at a rate of 30-day LIBOR + 5.00%, subject to a minimum rate of 7.00%, annualized. Interest on the loan will be paid on a current basis from cash flow distributed to us from the Hillsboro Managing Member JV Entity. The BEMT Co-Investor II Hillsboro Loan is secured by a pledge of our indirect membership interest in the Hillsboro property and a pledge of BEMT Hillsboro’s membership interest in the Hillsboro Managing Member JV Entity.
In accordance with the requirements of our charter, the affiliate loans were reviewed and approved by a majority of our Board of Directors (including a majority of our independent directors) as being fair, competitive, and commercially reasonable and no less favorable to us than loans between unaffiliated parties under the same circumstances. Furthermore, due to the unique investment opportunities presented, including the opportunity to distinguish ourselves competitively from other early-stage non-traded REITs, our Board of Directors expressly considered and approved leverage in excess of our general charter-imposed limitations in connection with entering into the affiliate loans.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Independent Auditors
KPMG, LLP has served as our independent auditors since August 23, 2010. The appointment of KPMG, LLP as our independent public accountants was unanimously approved by the Board of Directors. KPMG, LLP is the successor to our former independent auditors, Freedman & Goldberg (“Freedman”). Freedman served as our independent auditors from our formation until August 23, 2010.
The aggregate fees billed to us for professional accounting services, including the audit of our annual financial statements by KPMG, LLP for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and Freedman & Goldberg (“F&G”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, are set forth in the table below:
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Audit fees | ||||||||
KPMG | $ | 167,300 | $ | 95,000 | ||||
F&G | 48,655 | 85,440 | ||||||
Audit-related fees | ||||||||
KPMG | - | - | ||||||
F&G | 12,487 | 97,560 | ||||||
Tax fees | ||||||||
KPMG | 39,028 | - | ||||||
F&G | 1,252 | - | ||||||
All other fees | - | - | ||||||
Total | $ | 268,722 | $ | 278,000 |
For purposes of the preceding table professional fees are classified as follows:
· | Audit fees – These are fees for professional services performed for the audit of our annual financial statements and the required review of quarterly financial statements and other procedures performed by the independent auditors in order for them to be able to form an opinion on our consolidated financial statements. These fees also cover services that are normally provided by independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. |
· | Audit-related fees – These are fees for assurance and related services that traditionally are performed by independent auditors that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements, such as due diligence related to acquisitions and dispositions, attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation, internal control reviews and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. |
· | Tax fees – These are fees for all professional services performed by professional staff in our independent auditor’s tax division, except those services related to the audit of our financial statements. These include fees for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice, including federal, state and local issues. Services may also include assistance with tax audits and appeals before the IRS and similar state and local agencies, as well as federal, state and local tax issues related to due diligence. |
· | All other fees – These are fees for any services not included in the above-described categories. |
Pre-Approval Policies
In order to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditors’ independence, the audit committee approved, on January 14, 2009, an Audit Committee Pre-approval Policy for Audit and Non-audit Services. In establishing this policy, the audit committee considered whether the service is a permissible service under the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. In addition, the audit committee, may, in its discretion, delegate one or more of its members the authority to pre-approve any audit or non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors, provided any such approval is presented to and approved by the full audit committee at its next scheduled meeting.
38 |
Since October 15, 2009, when we became a reporting company under Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, all services rendered by our independent auditors have been pre-approved in accordance with the policies and procedures described above.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) | List of Documents Filed. |
1. | Financial Statements |
The list of the financial statements filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is set forth on page F-1 herein.
(b) | Exhibits. |
The exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
(c) | Financial Statement Schedules. |
All financial statement schedules, have been omitted because the required information of such schedules is not present, is not present in amounts sufficient to require a schedule or is included in the financial statements.
39 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC. | |
Date: March 13, 2012 | /s/ R. Ramin Kamfar |
R. Ramin Kamfar | |
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | |
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC. | |
Date: March 13, 2012 | /s/ R. Ramin Kamfar |
R. Ramin Kamfar | |
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | |
(Principal Executive Officer) | |
Date: March 13, 2012 | /s/ Jerold E. Novack |
Jerold E. Novack | |
Chief Financial Officer | |
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | |
Date: March 13, 2012 | /s/ Brian D. Bailey |
Brian D. Bailey | |
Director | |
Date: March 13, 2012 | /s/ I. Bobby Majumder |
I. Bobby Majumder | |
Director | |
Date: March 13, 2012 | /s/ Romano Tio |
Romano Tio | |
Director |
40 |
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||
Financial Statements | ||
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms | F-2 | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 | F-4 | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 | F-5 | |
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 | F-6 | |
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 | F-7 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-8 |
F-1 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ (deficit) equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG, LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 13, 2012
F-2 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statement of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flow for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. as of December 31, 2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flow for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Freedman & Goldberg, CPAs, PC
Farmington Hills, MI
March 31, 2010
F-3 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures | $ | 5,387,147 | $ | 6,301,860 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 420,570 | 125,237 | ||||||
Due from affiliates | - | 524,248 | ||||||
Other assets | 109,165 | 82,679 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 5,916,882 | $ | 7,034,024 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY | ||||||||
Notes payable to affiliates | $ | 3,834,578 | $ | 4,834,578 | ||||
Accounts payable | 119,899 | 219,686 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 471,927 | 261,495 | ||||||
Due to affiliates | 1,791,440 | - | ||||||
Distributions payable | 63,178 | 40,286 | ||||||
Total Liabilities | 6,281,022 | 5,356,045 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) | ||||||||
Redeemable common stock | 20,745 | 63,334 | ||||||
Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | - | - | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 749,999,000 shares authorized; 1,113,968 and 677,618 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively | 11,140 | 6,776 | ||||||
Nonvoting convertible stock, $0.01 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding | 10 | 10 | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital, net of costs | 7,475,175 | 4,586,644 | ||||||
Cumulative distributions and net losses | (7,871,210 | ) | (2,978,785 | ) | ||||
Total Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity | (384,885 | ) | 1,614,645 | |||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY | $ | 5,916,882 | $ | 7,034,024 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-4 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Expenses | ||||||||||||
Asset management and oversight fees to affiliates | $ | 330,156 | $ | 223,436 | $ | 9,140 | ||||||
Acquisition costs to affiliates | - | 362,766 | 191,953 | |||||||||
General and administrative | 3,564,948 | 314,691 | 45,391 | |||||||||
Total Expenses | 3,895,104 | 900,893 | 246,484 | |||||||||
Other operating activities | ||||||||||||
Equity loss of unconsolidated joint ventures | (73,665 | ) | (1,147,224 | ) | (177,117 | ) | ||||||
Operating Loss | (3,968,769 | ) | (2,048,117 | ) | (423,601 | ) | ||||||
Interest expense, net | (346,562 | ) | (258,753 | ) | (15,320 | ) | ||||||
Net Loss | $ | (4,315,331 | ) | $ | (2,306,870 | ) | $ | (438,921 | ) | |||
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share | $ | (5.34 | ) | $ | (6.95 | ) | $ | (17.28 | ) | |||
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding | 809,304 | 333,701 | 25,405 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-5 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY
Convertible Stock | Common Stock | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares | Par Value | Number of Shares | Par Value | Additional
Paid-in Capital | Cumulative Distributions | Net Loss | Total Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2009 | 1,000 | $ | 10 | 22,200 | $ | 222 | $ | 200,769 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 201,001 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock, net | - | - | 15,000 | 150 | 36,100 | - | - | 36,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred offering costs | - | - | - | - | (14,138 | ) | - | - | (14,138 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | - | - | - | - | - | - | (438,921 | ) | (438,921 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 | 1,000 | 10 | 37,200 | 372 | 222,731 | - | (438,921 | ) | (215,808 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock, net | - | - | 7,500 | 75 | 56,800 | - | - | 56,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock, net | - | - | 632,918 | 6,329 | 4,370,447 | - | - | 4,376,776 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers to redeemable common stock | - | - | - | - | (63,334 | ) | - | - | (63,334 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared | - | - | - | - | - | (232,994 | ) | - | (232,994 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | - | - | - | - | - | - | (2,306,870 | ) | (2,306,870 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 | 1,000 | 10 | 677,618 | 6,776 | 4,586,644 | (232,994 | ) | (2,745,791 | ) | 1,614,645 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock, net | - | - | 7,500 | 75 | 68,050 | - | - | 68,125 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock, net | - | - | 435,575 | 4,352 | 3,033,185 | - | - | 3,037,537 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemptions of common stock | - | - | (6,725 | ) | (63 | ) | 63 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers to redeemable common stock | - | - | - | - | (212,767 | ) | - | - | (212,767 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared | - | - | - | - | - | (577,094 | ) | - | (577,094 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | - | - | - | - | - | - | (4,315,331 | ) | (4,315,331 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 | 1,000 | $ | 10 | 1,113,968 | $ | 11,140 | $ | 7,475,175 | $ | (810,088 | ) | $ | (7,061,122 | ) | $ | (384,885 | ) |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-6 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (4,315,331 | ) | $ | (2,306,870 | ) | $ | (438,921 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Equity loss of unconsolidated joint ventures | 73,665 | 1,147,224 | 177,117 | |||||||||
Distributions from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures | 904,949 | 392,013 | - | |||||||||
Share-based compensation attributable to director’s stock compensation plan | 68,125 | 56,875 | 36,250 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in due to affiliates | 2,144,589 | (542,529 | ) | 18,281 | ||||||||
Decrease in other assets | (1,758 | ) | (82,679 | ) | - | |||||||
Decrease in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities | 74,068 | 465,861 | 15,320 | |||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (1,051,693 | ) | (870,105 | ) | (191,953 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures | (63,901 | ) | (5,455,647 | ) | (2,562,567 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (63,901 | ) | (5,455,647 | ) | (2,562,567 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||
Distributions on common stock | (366,163 | ) | (129,374 | ) | - | |||||||
Proceeds from notes payable | 150,000 | 5,086,713 | 2,754,520 | |||||||||
Repayment on notes payable | (1,150,000 | ) | (3,006,655 | ) | - | |||||||
Issuance of common stock, net | 2,840,424 | 4,313,442 | - | |||||||||
Payments to redeem common stock | (63,334 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Payment of offering costs | - | - | (14,138 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,410,927 | 6,264,126 | 2,740,382 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 295,333 | (61,626 | ) | (14,138 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 125,237 | 186,863 | 201,001 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 420,570 | $ | 125,237 | $ | 186,863 | ||||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information – Interest Paid | $ | 358,368 | $ | 262,864 | $ | - | ||||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Transactions: | ||||||||||||
Distributions payable | $ | 63,178 | $ | 40,286 | $ | - | ||||||
Redemptions payable | $ | 192,022 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Distributions to common stockholders through common stock issuances pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan including $24,728 declared but not yet reinvested in 2011 | $ | 212,767 | $ | 63,334 | $ | - | ||||||
Receivable for common stock issuances pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan | $ | (24,728 | ) | $ | - | $ | - |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-7 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 – Organization and Nature of Business
Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on July 25, 2008 under the laws of the state of Maryland. The Company has elected to be treated, and currently qualifies, as a real estate investment trust or REIT for Federal income tax purposes. The Company was incorporated to raise capital and acquire a diverse portfolio of residential real estate assets. Our day-to-day operations are managed by Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Advisor, LLC, or our Advisor, under an advisory agreement. The advisory agreement has a one-year term expiring October 14, 2012, and may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon the mutual consent of our Advisor and us. The use of the words “we,” “us” or “our” refers to Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. and its subsidiary Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Holdings, L.P., or our operating partnership, except where the context otherwise requires.
On August 22, 2008, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to offer a maximum of $1,000,000,000 in shares of its common stock in a primary offering, at an offering price of $10.00 per share, with discounts available for certain categories of purchasers and up to $285,000,000 in shares pursuant to its distribution reinvestment plan at $9.50 per share (the “Initial Public Offering”). The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) declared the Company’s registration statement effective on October 15, 2009. As of May 20, 2010, the Company had received gross offering proceeds sufficient to satisfy the minimum offering amount for the Initial Public Offering. Accordingly, the Company broke escrow with respect to subscriptions received from all states in which the shares are currently being offered. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had accepted aggregate gross offering proceeds of $10,339,123. Also as of December 31, 2011, the Company had redeemed 6,725 shares sold in the Initial Public Offering for $63,334.
On July 5, 2011, the Company provided its former dealer manager, Select Capital Corporation (“Select Capital”), with notice that it considers the Dealer Manager Agreement with Select Capital entered into on October 15, 2009 to have been terminated, effective immediately. In addition, on July 5, 2011, the Company entered into a dealer manager agreement with Bluerock Capital Markets, LLC (“Bluerock Capital Markets”), the Company’s affiliate, pursuant to which it assumed dealer manager responsibilities for the remainder of the Initial Public Offering. The dealer manager is responsible for marketing the Company’s shares in the Initial Public Offering.
The Initial Public Offering was suspended from November 17, 2010 until March 2, 2011 in connection with the Company’s determination to restate certain of its financial statements. These restatements, which were filed on January 19, 2011, resulted in unanticipated costs in the form of accounting, legal fees, and similar professional fees, in addition to the time and attention of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and members of its accounting team in preparing the restatements. The Company’s current corporate operating expenses exceed the cash flow received from its investments in real estate joint ventures. If the rate at which the Company raises offering proceeds does not improve significantly, its general and administrative costs will remain higher relative to the size of the Company’s portfolio, its portfolio may not be as diversified as it would be otherwise and the Company may need to seek additional sources of funding to address short and long term liquidity requirements. To the extent cash on hand is not sufficient to meet the Company’s short-term liquidity requirements it expects to utilize credit facilities obtained from affiliates or unaffiliated third parties. The Company’s Sponsor has also agreed to defer payment of asset management fees, acquisition fees and operating and offering costs advanced on its behalf and current year reimbursable operating expenses through 2012 as well as to fund any remaining cash shortfall, as necessary. In addition, as the Company’s sponsor has management control of the affiliates that are lenders to us and thus have the authority to extend the notes that have maturities in 2012; it has committed to extend such notes based on the Company’s ability to repay those obligations. The notes obtained from the Company’s affiliates, Augusta, Springhouse, Hillsboro and Meadowmont were all extended in 2011.
If the Company has not sold all of the shares in this offering by October 15, 2012, the Company intends to extend the primary offering by an additional six months by filing a registration statement to register a follow-on offering of shares of its common stock prior to October 15, 2012. By filing a registration statement for a follow-on offering prior to October 15, 2012, the Company would be able to continue selling shares of common stock with the same terms and conditions pursuant to that registration statement following April 15, 2013. There is no assurance that the follow-on offering will become effective and to the extent our follow-on offering does not become effective we would not be able to sell securities beyond April 15, 2013. To the extent the Company cannot sell shares of common stock to raise capital after its current offering ends, the Company would need to seek alternative financing arrangements to continue our operations and investment activities. The Company can make no assurances that it will be able to secure alternative financing arrangements if that becomes necessary.
The Company intends to use substantially all of the net proceeds from the Initial Public Offering to invest in a diverse portfolio of real estate and real estate-related assets. As of December 31, 2011, the Company owned, through joint venture partnerships, five multifamily real estate properties discussed in detail in Note 3 – Investments in Real Estate.
F-8 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 2 – Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The Company operates as an umbrella partnership REIT in which our wholly owned subsidiary, Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, or wholly owned subsidiaries of its operating partnership, owns substantially all of the property interests acquired on its behalf.
Because the Company is the sole general partner of its operating partnership and has unilateral control over its management and major operating decisions (even if additional limited partners are admitted to the operating partnership), the accounts of its operating partnership are consolidated in its consolidated financial statements. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The Company will consider future majority owned and controlled joint ventures for consolidation in accordance with the provisions required by the Consolidation Topic 810 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. At the property level these estimates include such items as purchase price allocation of real estate acquisitions, impairment of long-lived assets, depreciation and amortization and allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Joint Ventures
The Company analyzes its investments in joint ventures to determine if the joint venture is a variable interest entity (a “VIE”) and would require consolidation. A VIE is an entity that has (i) insufficient equity to permit it to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) equity holders that lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. VIE’s are consolidated by the primary beneficiary, which is the entity that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that potentially could be significant to the entity. Variable interests in a VIE are contractual, ownership, or other financial interests in a VIE that change with changes in the fair value of the VIE’s net assets. The Company continuously re-assesses whether the managing member LLC is (i) a VIE, and (ii) if the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. If it was determined an interest in the joint venture qualified as a VIE and the Company was the primary beneficiary it would be consolidated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents may include cash and short-term investments. Short-term investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. There are no restrictions on the use of the Company’s cash as of December 31, 2011.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company maintains cash balances with high quality financial institutions and periodically evaluates the creditworthiness of such institutions and believes that the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk. Cash balances may be in excess of the amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Deferred Financing Fees
Deferred financing fees, paid by the Company on behalf of its joint ventures, are recorded at cost within investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and are amortized to equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method over the life of the related joint venture debt.
F-9 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of the Stock Compensation Topic of the FASB ASC. This topic established a fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation and requires the fair value of stock-based compensation awards to amortize as an expense over the vesting period.
Distribution Policy
The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT, to operate as a REIT and has qualified since its taxable year ending December 31, 2010. To maintain its qualification as a REIT, the Company is required to make distributions each taxable year equal to at least 90% of its REIT annual taxable income (excluding net capital gains and income from operations or sales through a taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS). The Company expects to authorize and declare daily distributions that will be paid on a monthly basis.
Distributions to stockholders will be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors and will be dependent upon a number of factors relating to the Company, including funds available for the payment of distributions, financial condition, the timing of property acquisitions, capital expenditure requirements, and annual distribution requirements in order to maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and other considerations as our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Related Party Transactions
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company is obligated to pay the Advisor specified fees upon the provision of certain services related to, the investment of funds in real estate and real estate-related investments, management of our investments and for other services (including, but not limited to, the disposition of investments). The Company is also obligated to reimburse the Advisor for organization and offering costs incurred by the Advisor on our behalf, and is obligated to reimburse the Advisor for acquisition and origination expenses and certain operating expenses incurred on our behalf or incurred in connection with providing services to us. The Company records all related party fees as incurred, subject to any limitations described in the Advisory Agreement.
Selling Commissions and Dealer Manager Fees
The Company pays the dealer manager up to 7% and 2.6% of the gross offering proceeds from the primary offering as selling commissions and dealer manager fees, respectively. A reduced sales commission and dealer manager fee is paid with respect to certain volume discount sales. No sales commission or dealer manager fee is paid with respect to shares issued through the distribution reinvestment plan. The dealer manager may re-allow all or a portion of sales commissions earned to participating broker-dealers. The dealer manager may re-allow, in its sole discretion, to any participating broker-dealer a portion of its dealer manager fee as a marketing fee. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company has incurred $958,386 and $565,629, respectively, of selling commissions and dealer manager fees. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company had incurred no selling commissions and dealer manager fees as the minimum number of shares of common stock had not been issued.
Acquisition and Origination Fees
The Company pays the Advisor an acquisition fee equal to 1.75% of the cost of investments acquired, including acquisition expenses and any debt attributable to such investments. With respect to investments in and originations of loans, the Company pays an origination fee equal to 1.75% of the amount funded by us to acquire or originate mortgage, mezzanine, bridge or other loans, including any expenses related to such investments and any debt the Company uses to fund the acquisition or origination of these loans. The Company does not pay an acquisition fee with respect to investments in loans. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred no acquisition fees as no properties were purchased and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had incurred approximately $362,766 and $191,953, respectively, of acquisition fees.
F-10 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Asset Management Fee
With respect to investments in real estate, the Company pays the Advisor a monthly asset management fee equal to one-twelfth of 1% of the amount paid or allocated to acquire the investment excluding acquisition fees and expenses related thereto and the amount of any debt associated with or used to acquire such investment. In the case of investments made through joint ventures, the asset management fee will be determined based on our proportionate share of the underlying investment. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 the Company had incurred approximately $330,156, $223,436 and $9,140, respectively, of asset management fees.
Financing Fee
The Company pays the Advisor a financing fee equal to 1% of the amount, under any loan or line of credit, made available to us. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred no financing fees and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, incurred $75,000 and $44,000, respectively, of financing fees.
Independent Director Compensation
The Company pays each of its independent directors an annual retainer of $25,000. In addition, the independent directors are paid for attending meetings as follows: (i) $2,500 for each board meeting attended, (ii) $2,000 for each committee meeting attended, (iii) $1,000 for each teleconference board meeting attended, and (iv) $1,000 for each teleconference committee meeting attended. All directors also receive reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors. In addition 5,000 shares of restricted stock were granted upon initial election to the board and 2,500 shares of restricted stock will be granted upon re-election to the board. Director compensation is an operating expense of the Company that is subject to the operating expense reimbursement obligation of the Advisor discussed in Note 7, “Related Party Transactions.”
Income Taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and has qualified since the taxable year ended December 31, 2010. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income to stockholders (which is computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent it distributes qualifying dividends to its stockholders. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect the Company’s net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, the Company intends to continue to organize and operate in such a manner as to remain qualified for treatment as a REIT.
For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 all distributions received by the shareholders were classified as return of capital for tax purposes due to the net loss recorded by the Company.
The Company has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our financial statements. Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries have been assessed interest or penalties by any major tax jurisdictions. The Company’s evaluations were performed for the tax years ending December 31, 2011 and 2010. As of December 31, 2011, returns for the calendar years 2008 through 2010 remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions. Management has considered all positions taken on the 2008 through 2010 tax returns (where applicable) and those positions expected to be taken on the 2011 tax returns.
Reportable Segment
The Company’s current business consists of investing in and operating multifamily communities. Substantially all of its consolidated net loss is from investments in real estate properties that the Company owns through co-investment ventures which it accounts for under the equity method of accounting. The Company evaluates operating performance on an individual property level and views its real estate assets as one industry segment, and, accordingly, its properties will be aggregated into one reportable segment.
F-11 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2010, the FASB issued an update to its existing guidance on business combinations. This guidance requires a public entity that presents comparative financial statements to present in its pro forma disclosure the revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the prior annual reporting period. In addition, this guidance expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2010, which is calendar year 2011 for the Company. The guidance did not have an impact on our disclosures for the year ended December 31, 2011 as the Company has not acquired properties in the reporting period.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
There has been no issued accounting guidance not yet adopted by the Company that it believes is material or potentially material to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 3 – Investments in Real Estate
As of December 31, 2011, the Company’s portfolio consists of five properties acquired through unconsolidated joint ventures. The following table provides summary information regarding the Company’s investments ($ in thousands).
Joint Venture Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Our | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Approx. | Ownership | Annual | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily | Rentable | Property | Amount of | Interest in | Approx. | Effective | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community | Square | Number of | Date | Acquisition | Our | Property | Annualized | Rent Per | Approx. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name/Location | Footage | Units | Acquired | Cost(1) | Investment | Owner | Base Rent (2) | Unit(3) | % Leased | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (unaudited) | (unaudited) | (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Springhouse at Newport News/Newport News, Virginia | 310,826 | 432 | 12/03/2009 | $ | 29,250 | $ | 1,469 | 37.50 | % | $ | 4,220 | $ | 9 | 92 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
The Reserve at Creekside Village/Chattanooga, Tennessee | 211,632 | 192 | 03/31/2010 | $ | 14,250 | $ | 237 | 23.31 | % | $ | 2,137 | $ | 11 | 95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
The Apartments at Meadowmont/Chapel Hill, North Carolina | 296,240 | 258 | 04/09/2010 | $ | 36,960 | $ | 1,110 | 16.25 | % | $ | 4,058 | $ | 16 | 95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
The Estates at Perimeter/ Augusta, Georgia | 266,148 | 240 | 09/01/2010 | $ | 24,950 | $ | 1,491 | 25.00 | % | $ | 2,916 | $ | 12 | 93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gardens at Hillsboro Village/ Nashville, Tennessee | 187,430 | 201 | 09/30/2010 | $ | 32,394 | $ | 1,081 | 12.50 | % | $ | 3,372 | $ | 17 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1,272,276 | 1,323 | $ | 137,804 | $ | 5,388 | $ | 16,703 |
(1) | Property Acquisition Cost excludes acquisition fees and closing costs. |
(2) | Annualized base rent is calculated by annualizing the current, in-place monthly base rent for leases as of December 31, 2011 and does not take into account any rent concessions or prospective rent increases. |
(3) | Annual effective rent per unit includes the effect of tenant concessions over the term of the lease. |
F-12 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 4 – Equity Method Investments
The Company accounted for the acquisitions of our interests in properties through managing member LLCs in accordance with the provisions of the Consolidation Topic 810 of the FASB ASC. Following is a summary of the Company’s ownership interest by property as of December 31, 2011.
Joint Venture | Managing Member | Indirect Equity | ||||||||||
Property | Interest | LLC Interest | Interest in Property | |||||||||
Springhouse | 75.00 | % | 50.00 | % | 37.50 | % | ||||||
Creekside | 69.93 | % | 33.33 | % | 23.31 | % | ||||||
Meadowmont | 50.00 | % | 32.50 | % | 16.25 | % | ||||||
Augusta | 50.00 | % | 50.00 | % | 25.00 | % | ||||||
Hillsboro | 37.57 | % | 33.27 | % | 12.50 | % |
For Springhouse, Augusta and Hillsboro, the Company’s contribution into the managing member LLC was funded through a loan from an affiliate who is another investor in the managing member LLC; thus its equity investment is not at risk. Since unanimous approval is required by all members to direct the activities that most significantly impact the managing member LLC’s economic performance, the holder of the equity investment at risk lacks that power and thus the Company concluded that the managing member LLC entities are VIE’s. The Company is not the primary beneficiary because the Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the managing member LLC and would not be considered to be the investor that is most closely associated with the entity among the related party investors. As a result, the Company’s investments are reflected as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting.
For Creekside, the Company’s initial contribution into the managing member LLC was funded through a loan from an affiliate and accounted for as discussed above; however, on September 28, 2010 the loan was repaid and the managing member LLC was no longer considered a VIE. The Company then analyzed the managing member LLC under a voting interest model and determined that the investment in the unconsolidated joint venture should be accounted for under the equity method as each member had an equal voting interest.
For Meadowmont, the Company’s initial contribution into the managing member LLC on April 9, 2010 was funded through a loan from an affiliate who is another investor in the managing member LLC, but this was subsequently repaid on June 8, 2010. However, the voting rights of the investors are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses or their rights to receive the expected residual returns of the managing member and substantially all of the activities are done on behalf of the single related party group (all of the investors are part of a single related party group); thus this would cause the managing member LLC to be a VIE. The Company is not the primary beneficiary because the Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the managing member LLC and would not be considered to be the investor that is most closely associated with the entity among the related party investors. As a result the Company’s investment is reflected as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting.
The carrying amount of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures was $5,387,147 and $6,301,860 as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Summary unaudited financial information for the operating properties, Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and Operating Statements for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
December 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Balance Sheet: | ||||||||
Real estate, net of depreciation | $ | 129,269,044 | $ | 133,126,052 | ||||
Other assets | 4,603,031 | 4,622,311 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 133,872,075 | $ | 137,748,363 | ||||
Mortgage payable | $ | 105,900,779 | $ | 106,016,772 | ||||
Other current liabilities | 1,969,824 | 1,789,209 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 107,870,603 | $ | 107,805,981 | ||||
Stockholders’ equity | 26,001,472 | 29,942,382 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 133,872,075 | $ | 137,748,363 |
F-13 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Operating Statements: | ||||||||||||
Rental revenues | $ | 16,047,407 | $ | 9,910,400 | $ | 309,000 | ||||||
Operating expenses | (6,125,804 | ) | (4,042,700 | ) | (100,800 | ) | ||||||
Income before debt service, acquisition costs, and depreciation and amortization | 9,921,603 | 5,867,700 | 208,200 | |||||||||
Mortgage interest | (5,246,578 | ) | (3,581,100 | ) | (106,700 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition costs | - | (1,939,500 | ) | (361,800 | ) | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | (4,739,419 | ) | (5,139,300 | ) | (211,000 | ) | ||||||
Net income (loss) | (64,394 | ) | (4,792,200 | ) | (471,300 | ) | ||||||
Net (income) loss attributable to JV partners | 786 | 3,680,479 | 294,548 | |||||||||
(63,608 | ) | (1,111,721 | ) | (176,752 | ) | |||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs paid on behalf of joint ventures | (10,057 | ) | (35,503 | ) | (365 | ) | ||||||
Equity income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures | $ | (73,665 | ) | $ | (1,147,224 | ) | $ | (177,117 | ) |
Note 5 – Notes Payable
The carrying amounts of the notes payable as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
Principal Outstanding | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate as of | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Note Payable | Maturity | and 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Augusta | August 28, 2012 | 7.0 | % | $ | 1,931,484 | $ | 1,931,484 | |||||||||
Springhouse | June 3, 2012 | 7.0 | % | 646,067 | 1,646,067 | |||||||||||
Hillsboro | March 31, 2012 | 7.0 | % | 1,257,027 | 1,257,027 | |||||||||||
$ | 3,834,578 | $ | 4,834,578 |
On January 20, 2011, BEMT Meadowmont, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership (“BEMT Meadowmont”) entered into an agreement with Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, an affiliate of the Company’s sponsor (“SOIF II”) for a line of credit represented by a promissory note (the “Note”). Under the terms of the Note, BEMT Meadowmont was authorized to borrow, from time to time, up to $500,000, for general working capital. The Note had a six-month term from the date of the first advance which matured on July 20, 2011, and was subsequently extended to January 20, 2012 and again to July 20, 2012. It bears interest compounding monthly at a rate of 30-day LIBOR + 5.00%, subject to a minimum rate of 7.00%, annualized. Interest on the loan was paid on a current basis from cash flow distributed to the Company from BR Meadowmont JV Member, LLC (the “Meadowmont JV Member”). The Note is secured by a pledge of the Company’s indirect membership interest in the Meadowmont Property and a pledge of the Company’s direct membership interest in the Meadowmont JV Member. The loan plus accrued interest was paid in full on November 22, 2011.
On December 3, 2009, BEMT Springhouse LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership (“BEMT Springhouse”), entered into a loan agreement with Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund (“BEMT Co-Investor”) pursuant to which BEMT Springhouse borrowed $2.8 million (the “BEMT Co-Investor Springhouse Loan”). The BEMT Co-Investor Springhouse Loan initially had a six-month term, maturing June 3, 2010, which was subsequently extended to December 3, 2010, and again to June 3, 2011, and again to December 3, 2011 and again to June 3, 2012. A partial repayment in the amount of $1.1 million was made on June 23, 2010. An additional partial repayment in the amount of $1.0 million was made on December 29, 2011. It bears interest compounding monthly at a rate of 30-day LIBOR + 5.00%, subject to a minimum rate of 7.00%, annualized. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the interest rate on the BEMT Co-Investor Springhouse Loan was 7.00%. Interest on the loan is paid on a current basis from cash flow distributed to us from BR Springhouse Managing Member, LLC (the “Springhouse Managing Member JV Entity”). The BEMT Co-Investor Springhouse Loan is secured by a pledge of our indirect membership interest in the Springhouse property and a pledge of BEMT Springhouse’s membership interest in the Springhouse Managing Member JV Entity.
F-14 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On September 1, 2010, BEMT Augusta LLC (“BEMT Augusta”), entered into a loan agreement with BEMT Co-Investor pursuant to which it borrowed $1.9 million (the “BEMT Co-Investor Augusta Loan”), in connection with the Augusta Property closing. The BEMT Co-Investor Augusta Loan initially had a six-month term maturing February 28, 2011, which was subsequently extended to August 31, 2011, and again to February 28, 2012 and again to August 28, 2012. The loan may be prepaid without penalty. It bears interest compounding monthly at a rate of 30-day LIBOR + 5.00%, subject to a minimum rate of 7.00%, annualized. Interest on the loan is paid on a current basis from cash flow distributed to us from the Augusta Managing Member JV Entity. The BEMT Co-Investor Augusta Loan is secured by a pledge of our indirect membership interest in the Augusta property and a pledge of BEMT Augusta’s membership interest in the Augusta Managing Member JV Entity.
On September 30, 2010, BEMT Hillsboro LLC entered into a loan agreement with BEMT Co-Investor II pursuant to which it borrowed $1.3 million (the “BEMT Co-Investor II Hillsboro Loan). The BEMT Co-Investor II Hillsboro Loan initially had a six-month term maturing March 31, 2011, which was subsequently extended to September 30, 2011, and again to March 31, 2012. It bears interest compounding monthly at a rate of 30-day LIBOR + 5.00%, subject to a minimum rate of 7.00%, annualized. Interest on the loan is paid on a current basis from cash flow distributed to us from the Hillsboro Managing Member JV Entity. The BEMT Co-Investor II Hillsboro Loan is secured by a pledge of our indirect membership interest in the Hillsboro property and a pledge of BEMT Hillsboro’s membership interest in the Hillsboro Managing Member JV Entity.
The Company expects to repay the notes with the proceeds to be raised from the Initial Public Offering. If the Company is unable to repay the principal amounts upon maturity, its sponsor, who has management control of the affiliates that are lenders to the Company and thus has the authority to extend the notes that have maturities in 2012, has committed to extend such notes based on the Company’s ability to repay those obligations. The notes obtained from the Company’s affiliates, Augusta, Hillsboro and Springhouse have all been extended.
Note 6 – Fair Value Disclosure
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
· | Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities; |
· | Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and |
· | Level 3 – Prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available that requires inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
If the inputs used to measure the fair value of a financial instrument fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the financial instrument is categorized based upon the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Whenever possible, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine fair value. In the absence of quoted market prices, the Company uses independent sources and data to determine fair value.
As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company believes the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents and receivables and payables from affiliates, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, distribution payable and notes payable approximate their fair values based on their highly-liquid nature and/or short-term maturities, including prepayment options. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had no significant assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. The Company estimates fair values for financial instruments based on interest rates with similar terms and remaining maturities that management believes it could obtain.
F-15 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 7 – Related Party Transactions
In connection with the Company’s investments it entered into loan agreements with Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC, the terms of which are described above in Note 5 - Notes Payable (Springhouse, Augusta, Hillsboro and Meadowmont).
As of December 31, 2011, $2,965,111 of organizational and offering costs have been incurred on the Company’s behalf. The Company is liable to reimburse these costs only to the extent selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and other organization and offering costs do not exceed 15% of the gross proceeds of the Initial Public Offering. When recorded by the Company, organizational costs are expensed and third-party offering costs are charged to stockholders’ equity. Organizational and offering costs will be reimbursed from the gross proceeds of the Initial Public Offering. Through December 31, 2011, $49,931 of organizational costs were expensed in 2010 and $2,256,663 million of offering costs have been charged to stockholders’ equity. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had recognized offering costs, other than selling commissions and dealer manager fees, of $1,339,397 of which $831,741 was paid directly by the Company and $507,656 was reimbursed to the Advisor, and $49,931 of organizational costs.
The Advisor performs its duties and responsibilities as the Company’s fiduciary under an advisory agreement. The advisory agreement has a one-year term expiring October 14, 2012, and may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon the mutual consent of the Company and its Advisor. The Advisor conducts the Company’s operations and manages its portfolio of real estate and real estate-related investments under the terms of the advisory agreement. Certain of the Company’s affiliates will receive fees and compensation in connection with the Initial Public Offering, and the acquisition, management and sale of its real estate investments.
The Company pays its Advisor a monthly asset management fee for the services it provides pursuant to the advisory agreement. The asset management fee equals one-twelfth of 1.0% of the higher of the cost or the value of each asset, where (A) cost equals the amount actually paid, excluding acquisition fees and expenses, to purchase each asset it acquires, including any debt attributable to the asset (including any debt encumbering the asset after acquisition), provided that, with respect to any properties the Company develops, constructs or improves, cost will include the amount expended by the Company for the development, construction or improvement, and (B) the value of an asset is the value established by the most recent independent valuation report, if available, without reduction for depreciation, bad debts or other non-cash reserves. The asset management fee will be based only on the portion of the cost or value attributable to our investment in an asset if the Company does not own all of an asset.
The Advisor receives 1.75% of the purchase price of a property or investment for its services in connection with the investigation, selection, sourcing, due diligence and acquisition of that property or investment. The purchase price of a property or investment will equal the amount paid or allocated to the purchase, development, construction or improvement of a property, inclusive of expenses related thereto, and the amount of debt associated with such real property or investment. The purchase price allocable for joint venture investments will equal the product of (1) the purchase price of the underlying property and (2) the Company’s ownership percentage in the joint venture. The Company will pay the Advisor an origination fee in lieu of an acquisition fee for services in connection with the investigation, selection, sourcing, due diligence, and acquisition of mortgage, subordinated, bridge or other loans of 1.75% of the principal amount of the borrower’s loan obligation or of the purchase price of any loan the Company purchases including third- party expenses.
F-16 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Advisor also receives a financing fee equal to 1% of the amount, under any loan or line of credit, made available to the Company. The Advisor may re-allow some or all of this fee to reimburse third parties with whom it may subcontract to procure such financing for the Company. In addition, to the extent the Advisor provides a substantial amount of services in connection with the disposition of one or more of our properties or investments (except for securities that are traded on a national securities exchange), the Advisor will receive fees equal to the lesser of (A) 1.5% of the sales price of each property or other investment sold or (B) 50% of the selling commission that would have been paid to a third-party broker in connection with such a disposition. In no event may disposition fees paid to the Advisor or its affiliates and unaffiliated third parties exceed in the aggregate 6% of the contract sales price. In addition to the fees payable to the Advisor, the Company reimburses the Advisor for all reasonable expenses incurred in connection with services provided to the Company, subject to the limitation that it will not reimburse any amount that would cause the Company’s total operating expenses at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters to exceed the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of its net income determined (1) without reductions for any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves and (2) excluding any gain from the sale of our assets for the period. Notwithstanding the above, the Company may reimburse amounts in excess of the limitation if a majority of its independent directors determines such excess amount was justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. If such excess expenses are not approved by a majority of the Company’s independent directors, its Advisor must reimburse us at the end of the four fiscal quarters the amount by which the aggregate expenses during the period paid or incurred by us exceeded the limitations provided above. The Company will not reimburse the Advisor for personnel costs in connection with services for which the Advisor receives acquisition, origination or disposition fees. From January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011, the Company’s Advisor and its affiliates incurred $677,415 of operating expenses on our behalf. Due to the limitation discussed above and because operating expenses incurred directly by the Company exceeded the 2% threshold, the amount due to the Advisor had not been recorded in the financial statements as of December 31, 2010. Further, $973,607 had been recorded as a receivable from the Advisor as of December 31, 2010 for the excess operating expenses incurred directly by the Company over the 2% threshold. The Company’s Board of Directors, including all of its independent directors, reviewed the total operating expenses for the four fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2009 (and the four fiscal quarters ended each quarter after) and an estimate of the Company’s total operating expenses for the four fiscal quarters to end March 31, 2011 and unanimously determined the excess amount to be justified because of the costs of operating a public company in its early stage of operation. Upon approval of these costs on March 22, 2011, $1,646,818 of these costs were expensed and $677,415 became a liability to the Company, payable to its Advisor and its affiliates. As the Board of Directors has previously approved such expenses, all 2011 operating expenses have been and will be expensed as incurred. As of December 31, 2011, $4,204 has been reimbursed to the Company’s Advisor and the Advisor has agreed to defer further repayment of these costs until a later date.
The Company has issued 1,000 shares of convertible stock, par value $0.01 per share to the Company’s Advisor. The convertible stock will convert to shares of common stock if and when: (A) the Company has made total distributions on the then outstanding shares of its common stock equal to the original issue price of those shares plus an 8% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on the original issue price of those shares or (B) subject to specified conditions, the Company lists its common stock for trading on a national securities exchange. A “listing” will be deemed to have occurred on the effective date of any merger of the Company in which the consideration received by the holders of its common stock is the securities of another issuer that are listed on a national securities exchange. Upon conversion, each share of convertible stock will convert into a number of shares of common stock equal to 1/1000 of the quotient of (A) 15% of the excess of (1) the Company’s “enterprise value” (as defined in the Company’s charter) plus the aggregate value of distributions paid to date on the outstanding shares of its common stock over the (2) aggregate purchase price paid by the stockholders for those shares plus an 8% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on the original issue price of those shares, divided by (B) the Company’s enterprise value divided by the number of outstanding shares of common stock, in each case calculated as of the date of the conversion. In the event an event triggering the conversion occurs after the advisory agreement with the Advisor is not renewed or terminates (other than because of a material breach by the Advisor), the number of shares of common stock the Advisor will receive upon conversion will be prorated to account for the period of time the advisory agreement was in force.
The Company may pay Bluerock REIT Property Management, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Advisor, a property management fee equal to 4% of the monthly gross income from any properties it manages. In general, the Company contracts property management services for certain properties directly to non-affiliated third parties, in which event it will pay the Advisor an oversight fee equal to 1% of monthly gross revenues of such properties.
All of the Company’s executive officers and some of its directors are also executive officers, managers and/or holders of a direct or indirect controlling interest in the Advisor and other Bluerock-affiliated entities. As a result, they owe fiduciary duties to each of these entities, their members and limited partners and investors, which fiduciary duties may from time to time conflict with the fiduciary duties that they owe to the Company and its stockholders.
Some of the material conflicts that the Advisor or its affiliates face are: 1) the determination of whether an investment opportunity should be recommended to us or another Bluerock-sponsored program or Bluerock-advised investor; 2) the allocation of the time of key executive officers, directors, and other real estate professionals among the Company, other Bluerock-sponsored programs and Bluerock-advised investors, and the activities in which they are involved; 3) the fees received by the Advisor and its affiliates in connection with transactions involving the purchase, origination, management and sale of investments regardless of the quality of the asset acquired or the service provided us; and 4) the fees received by the Advisor and its affiliates in connection with the Initial Public Offering.
F-17 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Pursuant to the terms of the advisory agreement, summarized below are the related-party amounts payable and receivable as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:
Payable | Receivable | Payable | Receivable | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Asset Management and Oversight Fees | $ | 562,732 | $ | - | $ | 232,576 | $ | - | ||||||||
Acquisitions Fees | 81,776 | - | 81,776 | - | ||||||||||||
Financing Fees | 14,491 | - | 14,491 | - | ||||||||||||
Reimbursable Operating Expenses | 900,512 | - | - | 973,607 | ||||||||||||
Reimbursable Offering Costs | 171,099 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Reimbursable Organizational Costs | 49,931 | - | 49,931 | - | ||||||||||||
Other | 10,899 | - | 70,585 | - | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,791,440 | $ | - | $ | 449,359 | $ | 973,607 |
In addition to the amounts shown above, the Company’s Advisor has incurred on the Company’s behalf $2,407,524 of offering costs which will become payable as additional offering proceeds are raised to the extent that selling commissions, dealer manager fees and other organization and offering costs do not exceed 15% of gross offering proceeds
Note 8 – Stockholders’ Equity
Net Loss Per Common Share
Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common shareholders by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and any potential dilutive shares for the period. Under the two-class method of computing earnings per share, net loss attributable to common shareholders is computed by adjusting net loss for the non-forfeitable dividends paid on non-vested restricted stock.
The following tables reconcile the components of basic and diluted net loss per common share:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Net Loss | $ | (4,315,331 | ) | $ | (2,306,870 | ) | $ | (438,921 | ) | |||
Dividends on restricted stock expected to vest | (10,891 | ) | (11,300 | ) | - | |||||||
Gain on redemption of common stock(2) | 7,688 | - | - | |||||||||
Basic net loss attributable to common shareholders | $ | (4,318,534 | ) | $ | (2,318,170 | ) | $ | (438,921 | ) | |||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 809,304 | 333,701 | 25,405 | |||||||||
Potential dilutive shares (1) | - | - | - | |||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding and potential dilutive shares | 809,304 | 333,701 | 25,405 | |||||||||
Basic and diluted loss per share | $ | (5.34 | ) | $ | (6.95 | ) | $ | (17.28 | ) |
(1) Excludes 15,559, 16,142, and 9,436 shares related to non-vested restricted stock for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively as the effect would be anti-dilutive. Also excludes any dilution related to the 1,000 shares of convertible stock as the conversion would be anti-dilutive and currently there would be no conversion into common shares. |
(2)Represents the difference between the fair value and carrying amount of the common stock upon redemption.
Common Stock
The Company is offering and selling to the public up to 100,000,000 shares of its $.01 par value common stock for $10.00 per share, with discounts available for certain categories of purchasers. The Company is also offering up to 30,000,000 shares of its $.01 par value common stock to be issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at $9.50 per share.
F-18 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Convertible Stock
The Company has issued to its Advisor 1,000 shares of its convertible stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000. Upon certain conditions, the convertible stock will convert to shares of common stock with a value equal to 15% of the excess of (i) our enterprise value (as defined in our charter) plus the aggregate value of distributions paid to stockholders over (ii) the aggregate purchase price paid by stockholders for our shares plus a 8% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on the original issue price paid for those outstanding shares
Share Repurchase Plan and Redeemable Common Stock
The Company has adopted a share repurchase plan that may enable stockholders to sell their shares to the Company in limited circumstances.
There are several limitations on the Company’s ability to repurchase shares under the share repurchase plan:
· | The Company may not repurchase shares until the stockholder has held the shares for one year. |
· | During any calendar year, the share repurchase plan limits the number of shares the Company may repurchase to those that the Company could purchase with the net proceeds from the sale of shares under the distribution reinvestment plan during the previous fiscal year. |
· | During any calendar year, the Company may not repurchase in excess of 5% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of the same date in the prior calendar year. |
Pursuant to the plan, the Company will initially repurchase shares at prices determined as follows:
· | The lower of $9.25 or the price paid to acquire the shares from the Company for stockholders who have held their shares for at least one year; |
· | The lower of $9.50 or the price paid to acquire the shares from the Company for stockholders who have held their shares for at least two years; |
· | The lower of $9.75 or the price paid to acquire the shares from the Company for stockholders who have held their shares for at least three years; and |
· | The lower of $10.00 or the price paid to acquire the shares from the Company for stockholders who have held their shares for at least four years |
The Company’s Board of Directors may amend or modify any provision of the plan at any time in its discretion without prior notice to participants. In the event that the Company’s Board of Directors amends, suspends or terminates the share repurchase plan, however, the Company will send stockholders notice of the change(s) following the date of such amendment, suspension or modification, and will disclose the change(s) in a report filed with the SEC on either Form 8-K, Form 10-Q or Form 10-K, as appropriate.
The Company records amounts that are redeemable under the share repurchase plan as redeemable common stock in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets because the shares are redeemable at the option of the holder and therefore their redemption is outside the Company’s control. The maximum amount redeemable under the Company’s share repurchase plan is limited to the number of shares the Company could repurchase with the amount of the net proceeds from the sale of shares under the distribution reinvestment plan during the prior fiscal year. However, because the amounts that can be repurchased in future periods are determinable and only contingent on an event that is likely to occur (e.g., the passage of time), the Company presents the net proceeds from the current dividend reinvestment plan, net of current year redemptions, as redeemable common stock in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company classifies financial instruments that represent a mandatory obligation to the Company to repurchase shares as liabilities. When the Company determines it has a mandatory obligation to repurchase shares under the share repurchase plan the Company will reclassify such obligations from temporary equity to a liability based upon their respective settlement values. In addition, upon reclassification of such obligation to a liability, the difference between the fair value of the instrument and the carrying amount should be added to (or subtracted from) net earnings available to common shareholders in the calculation of earnings per share.
F-19 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company limits the dollar value of shares that may be repurchased under the program as described above. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company redeemed $63,334 of common stock. Based on the amount of net proceeds raised from the sale of shares under the dividend reinvestment plan during 2010 totaling $63,334, the Company redeemed the entire amount available during 2011. As the Company has received additional redemption requests that they are able to fill from the remaining net proceeds from the sale of the shares under the dividend reinvestment plan for 2011 totaling $212,767, $192,022 has been reclassified from redeemable common stock to other accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2011.
Equity Compensation Plan
The Company has adopted the Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan, which the Company refers to as the Incentive Plan, in order to enable us to (1) provide an incentive to our employees, officers, directors, and consultants and employees and officers of our Advisor to increase the value of our common stock, (2) give such persons a stake in our future that corresponds to the stake of each of our stockholders, and (3) obtain or retain the services of these persons who are considered essential to our long-term success, by offering such persons an opportunity to participate in our growth through ownership of our common stock or through other equity-related awards. The Company intends to issue awards only to its independent directors under its Incentive Plan (which awards will be granted under the independent director’s compensation plan). The Company has reserved and authorized an aggregate number of 2,000,000 shares of its common stock for issuance under the Incentive Plan.
Stock-based Compensation for Independent Directors
The Company’s independent directors received an automatic grant of 5,000 shares of restricted stock on the effective date of the Initial Public Offering and will receive an automatic grant of 2,500 shares of restricted stock when such directors are reelected at each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders thereafter. Each person who thereafter is elected or appointed as an independent director will receive an automatic grant of 5,000 shares of restricted stock on the date such person is first elected as an independent director and an automatic grant of 2,500 shares of restricted stock when such director is reelected at each annual meeting of our stockholders thereafter. To the extent allowed by applicable law, the independent directors will not be required to pay any purchase price for these grants of restricted stock. The restricted stock will vest 20% at the time of the grant and 20% on each anniversary thereafter over four years from the date of the grant. All restricted stock may receive distributions, whether vested or unvested. The value of the restricted stock to be granted is not determinable until the date of grant.
On August 8, 2011, the Company’s three independent directors received an automatic grant of 2,500 shares each of restricted stock after their re-election to the Board of Directors at the Company’s annual meeting.
A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested shares as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, is as follows:
Weighted average | ||||||||
grant-date fair | ||||||||
Non Vested shares | Shares | value | ||||||
Balance at January 1, 2009 | - | $ | - | |||||
Granted | 15,000 | 150,000 | ||||||
Vested | (3,000 | ) | (30,000 | ) | ||||
Forfeited | - | - | ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 | 12,000 | 120,000 | ||||||
Granted | 7,500 | 75,000 | ||||||
Vested | (4,500 | ) | (45,000 | ) | ||||
Forfeited | - | - | ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 | 15,000 | 150,000 | ||||||
Granted | 7,500 | 75,000 | ||||||
Vested | (6,000 | ) | (60,000 | ) | ||||
Forfeited | - | - | ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 | 16,500 | $ | 165,000 |
At December 31, 2011, there was $138,750 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of four years. The total fair value of shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2011, was $60,000.
The Company currently uses authorized and unissued shares to satisfy share award grants.
F-20 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Distributions
Distributions, including distributions paid by issuing shares under the distribution reinvestment plan, for the year ended December 31, 2011 were as follows:
Distributions | ||||||||
2011 | Declared | Paid | ||||||
First Quarter | $ | 117,538 | $ | 117,040 | ||||
Second Quarter | 134,526 | 129,314 | ||||||
Third Quarter | 148,402 | 144,069 | ||||||
Fourth Quarter | 176,628 | 163,779 | ||||||
$ | 577,094 | $ | 554,202 |
Distributions are calculated based on stockholders of record each day during the period at a rate of $0.00191781 per share per day and equal a daily amount that, if paid each day for a 365-day period, would equal a 7.0% annualized rate based on a purchase price of $10.00 per share.
Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to various legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of any legal matter cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not believe that any of these legal proceedings or matters will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
Note 10 – Economic Dependency
The Company is dependent on the Advisor for certain services that are essential to the Company, including the identification, evaluation, negotiation, purchase and disposition of properties and other investments; management of the daily operations of its real estate portfolio; and other general and administrative responsibilities. In the event that these companies are unable to provide the respective services, the Company will be required to obtain such services from other sources.
Note 11 – Subsequent Events
The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through the date the Company’s consolidated financial statements were issued. No material subsequent events, other than the items disclosed below, have occurred that required recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.
Status of the Offering
For the period January 1, 2012 through March 2, 2012, the Company sold approximately 141,379 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $1,331,168 including issuances through its distribution reinvestment plan.
Distributions Paid
Dollar amount of | ||||||||||||||
Distributions | Shares Issued | |||||||||||||
Declared Daily | pursuant to the | |||||||||||||
For Each Day in | distribution | |||||||||||||
Month Listed | Date Paid | Total Distribution | Cash Distribution | reinvestment plan | ||||||||||
December 2011 | January 3, 2012 | $ | 63,178 | $ | 38,450 | $ | 24,728 | |||||||
January 2012 | February 1, 2012 | $ | 67,095 | $ | 40,637 | $ | 26,458 | |||||||
February 2012 | March 1, 2012 | $ | 66,921 | $ | 40,726 | $ | 26,195 |
F-21 |
BLUEROCK ENHANCED MULTIFAMILY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Distributions Declared
On March 7, 2012, our Board of Directors declared distributions based on daily record dates for the period from April 1, 2012 through July 31, 2012. Distributions payable to each stockholder of record were or will be paid in cash on or before the 15th day of the following month.
Distributions are calculated based on stockholders of record per day during the period at a rate of $0.00191781 per share per day and equal a daily amount that, if paid each day for a 365-day period, would equal a 7.0% annualized rate based on a purchase price of $10.00 per share.
Extension of Meadowmont Affiliate Loan
Pursuant to the terms of that certain Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement dated January 20, 2012 (the “Meadowmont Modification Agreement”), BEMT Meadowmont, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Holdings, L.P., of which the Company is the general partner, extended the maturity date of its $500,000 line of credit (the “Meadowmont Affiliate Loan”) from Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC, an affiliate of the Company’s sponsor. Under the terms of the Meadowmont Affiliate Loan, BEMT Meadowmont, LLC may borrow, from time to time, up to $500,000, for general working capital. The maturity date of the Meadowmont Affiliate Loan was previously extended to January 20, 2012. The Meadowmont Modification Agreement extends the maturity date of the Meadowmont Affiliate Loan to July 20, 2012. All other terms of the Meadowmont Affiliate Loan remain unchanged.
Extension of Augusta Affiliate Loan
Pursuant to the terms of that certain Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement dated February 28, 2012 (the “Augusta Modification Agreement”), BEMT Augusta, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Holdings, L.P., of which the Company is the general partner, extended the maturity date of its $1,931,484 affiliate loan (the “Augusta Affiliate Loan”) from Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC, an affiliate of the Company’s sponsor. The Augusta Affiliate Loan is related to the Company’s investment in the joint venture through which it acquired the 240-unit multifamily community known as the Estates at Perimeter (formerly known as St. Andrews Apartments) located in Augusta, Georgia. The maturity date of the Augusta Affiliate Loan was previously extended from February 28, 2011 to August 31, 2011 and again from August 31, 2011 to February 28, 2012. The Augusta Modification Agreement further extends the maturity date of the Augusta Affiliate Loan from February 28, 2012 to August 31, 2012. All other terms of the Augusta Affiliate Loan remain unchanged.
F-22 |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | |||
Number | Description | ||
3.1 | Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135). | ||
3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135). | ||
4.1 | Distribution Reinvestment Plan, included as Exhibit B to the Prospectus dated July 12, 2011 | ||
4.2 | Form of Subscription Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.1 | Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement between Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. and Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Advisor, LLC, dated March 30, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 24, 2011 | ||
10.2 | Form of Escrow Agreement between Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. and UMB Bank, N.A. , incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.3 | Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. Independent Directors Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.4 | Limited Liability Company/Joint Venture Agreement of BR Springhouse Managing Member, LLC, dated as of December 3, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.5 | Limited Liability Company/Joint Venture Agreement of BR Hawthorne Springhouse JV, LLC, dated as of December 3, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.6 | Property Management Agreement by and between BR Springhouse, LLC and Hawthorne Residential Partners, LLC, dated as of December 3, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.7 | Multifamily Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement by BR Springhouse, LLC for the benefit of CW Capital, LLC date December 3, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.8 | Loan Agreement by and between Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund, LLC, as lender, and BEMT Springhouse, LLC, dated as of December 3, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-13135) | ||
10.9 | Pledge and Security Agreement by Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Holdings L.P. and BEMT Springhouse LLC for Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund, LLC dated December 3, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.10 |
Pledge and Security Agreement by BEMT Springhouse LLC for Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund, LLC dated December 3, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.11 | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of BR Creekside Managing Member, LLC, dated as of March 31, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 17, 2010 | ||
10.12 | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of BR Hawthorne Creekside JV, LLC, dated as of March 31, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 17, 2010 |
F-23 |
10.13 | Property Management Agreement by and between BR Creekside, LLC and Hawthorne Residential Partners, LLC, dated as of March 31, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 17, 2010 | ||
10.14 | General Warranty Deed from the Reserve at Creekside, a Florida limited partnership to BR Creekside LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.15 | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of BR Meadowmont Managing Member, LLC, dated as of April 9, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.16 | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Bell BR Meadowmont JV, LLC, dated as of April 9, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.17 | Promissory Note by and between BEMT Meadowmont, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC dated April 9, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.18 | Pledge and Security Agreement by and between BEMT Meadowmont, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC dated April 9, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.19 | Multifamily Note - CME by and between Bell BR Meadowmont, LLC and CWCapital, LLC dated April 9, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.20 | Property Management Agreement by and between Bell BR, LLC and Bell Partners, Inc dated as of April 9, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.21 | Modification of the Secured Promissory Note between BEMT Springhouse, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund, LLC dated as of June 3, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 | ||
10.22 | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of BR Augusta JV Member, LLC, dated as of September 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.23 | Limited Liability Company Agreement of BSF/BR Augusta JV, LLC, dated as of July 29, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135). | ||
10.24 | Promissory Note by and between BEMT Augusta, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC dated September 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135). | ||
10.25 | Pledge and Security Agreement by and between BEMT Augusta, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC dated September 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135). | ||
10.26 | Multifamily Note - by and between BSF/BR Augusta, LLC and CWCapital dated September 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135). | ||
10.27 | Property Management Agreement by and between BSF-St. Andrews, LLC and Hawthorne Residential Partners, Inc dated as of September 7, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135). | ||
10.28 | Limited Liability Company/Joint Venture Agreement of Bell BR Hillsboro Village JV, LLC, dated as of September 30, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.29 | Promissory Note by and between BEMT Hillsboro Village, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC dated September 30, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135). |
F-24 |
10.30 | Pledge and Security Agreement by and between BEMT Hillsboro Village, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC dated September 30, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135). | ||
10.31 | Multifamily Deed of Trust - by and between Bell BR Hillsboro Village JV, LLC and CBRE Multifamily Capital, Inc. dated September 30, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135). | ||
10.32 | Property Management Agreement by and between Bell BR Hillsboro Village JV, LLC and Bell Partners, Inc dated as of September 27, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135). | ||
10.33 | Deed of Trust Note between BR Creekside, LLC and Walker & Dunlop, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 20, 2010 | ||
10.34 | Promissory Note between BEMT Meadowmont, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, dated as of January 20, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2011 | ||
10.35 | Pledge and Security Agreement between BEMT Meadowmont LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity & Income Fund II, dated as of January 20, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2011 | ||
10.36 | Promissory Note between BEMT Meadowmont, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, dated as of January 20, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2011 | ||
10.37 | Pledge and Security Agreement between BEMT Meadowmont LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity & Income Fund II, dated as of January 20, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2011 | ||
10.38 | Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement between Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Advisors LP and the Company dated March 30, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 13, 2011 | ||
10.39 | Letter Agreement between Bluerock Real Estate, LLC and the Company dated March 28, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 13, 2011 | ||
10.40 | Dealer Manager Agreement between Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc. and Bluerock Capital Markets dated July 5, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.3 to Post-effective Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.41 | Participating Broker-Dealer Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.4 to Post-effective Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
10.42 | Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement dated July 20, 2011 between BEMT Meadowmont, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2011 | ||
10.43 | Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement dated August 31, 2011 between BEMT Augusta, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2011 | ||
10.44 | Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement dated September 30, 2011 between BEMT Hillsboro Village, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2011 |
F-25 |
10.45 | Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement dated December 3, 2011 between BEMT Springhouse, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund, LLC | ||
10.46 | Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement dated January 20, 2012 between BEMT Meadowmont, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC | ||
10.47 | Secured Promissory Note Modification Agreement dated February 28, 2012 between BEMT Augusta, LLC and Bluerock Special Opportunity + Income Fund II, LLC | ||
21.1 | List of Subsidiaries incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Registrants’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-153135) | ||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
101.1 | The following information from the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Balance Sheets; (ii) Statements of Operations; (iii) Statement of Stockholders’ Equity; (iv) Statements of Cash Flows |
F-26 |