BOSTON PROPERTIES INC - Quarter Report: 2015 June (Form 10-Q)

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2015

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-13087

BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		04-2473675
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Prudential Center, 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1900, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-8103

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(617) 236-3300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer x		Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		153,573,619
(Class)		(Outstanding on August 3, 2015)

BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.

FORM 10-Q

for the quarter ended June 30, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)		1

	a) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014		1

	b) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014		2

	c) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014		3

	d) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014		4

	e) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014		5

	f) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements		7

ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		29

ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		78

ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures		79

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings		80

ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors		80

ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		80

ITEM 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		80

ITEM 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		80

ITEM 5.	Other Information		80

ITEM 6.	Exhibits		81

SIGNATURES			82

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1—Financial Statements.

BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)


	June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(in thousands, except for share and par value amounts)
ASSETS
Real estate, at cost	$	18,207,934		$	18,231,978
Construction in progress		880,996			736,311
Land held for future development		277,327			268,114
Less: accumulated depreciation		(3,753,926	)		(3,547,659	)

Total real estate		15,612,331			15,688,744
Cash and cash equivalents		1,342,751			1,763,079
Cash held in escrows		252,558			487,321
Investments in securities		20,953			19,459
Tenant and other receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,061 and $1,142, respectively)		55,183			46,595
Accrued rental income (net of allowance of $1,219 and $1,499, respectively)		730,797			691,999
Deferred charges, net		771,419			831,744
Prepaid expenses and other assets		117,993			164,432
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures		209,974			193,394

Total assets	$	19,113,959		$	19,886,767

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Mortgage notes payable	$	4,269,808		$	4,309,484
Unsecured senior notes (net of discount of $11,497 and $12,296, respectively)		5,288,503			5,287,704
Unsecured line of credit		—			—
Mezzanine notes payable		309,148			309,796
Outside members’ notes payable		180,000			180,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		231,900			243,263
Dividends and distributions payable		112,892			882,472
Accrued interest payable		178,548			163,532
Other liabilities		448,480			502,255

Total liabilities		11,019,279			11,878,506

Commitments and contingencies		—			—

Noncontrolling interests:
Redeemable preferred units of the Operating Partnership		—			633

Redeemable interest in property partnership		106,233			104,692

Equity:
Stockholders’ equity attributable to Boston Properties, Inc.:
Excess stock, $.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		—			—
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized;
5.25% Series B cumulative redeemable preferred stock, $.01 par value, liquidation preference $2,500 per share, 92,000 shares authorized, 80,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014		200,000			200,000
Common stock, $.01 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 153,552,831 and 153,192,845 issued and 153,473,931 and 153,113,945 outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively		1,535			1,531
Additional paid-in capital		6,293,556			6,270,257
Dividends in excess of earnings		(711,239	)		(762,464	)
Treasury common stock at cost, 78,900 shares at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014		(2,722	)		(2,722	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		1,848			(9,304	)

Total stockholders’ equity attributable to Boston Properties, Inc.		5,782,978			5,697,298
Noncontrolling interests:
Common units of the Operating Partnership		614,988			603,171
Property partnerships		1,590,481			1,602,467

Total equity		7,988,447			7,902,936

Total liabilities and equity	$	19,113,959		$	19,886,767

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Revenue
Rental
Base rent	$	486,609		$	463,239		$	977,291		$	918,257
Recoveries from tenants		86,795			81,382			175,388			163,316
Parking and other		26,552			26,300			51,340			50,633

Total rental revenue		599,956			570,921			1,204,019			1,132,206
Hotel revenue		13,403			12,367			22,488			20,560
Development and management services		4,862			6,506			10,190			11,722

Total revenue		618,221			589,794			1,236,697			1,164,488

Expenses
Operating
Rental		214,464			202,646			435,814			409,034
Hotel		8,495			7,315			16,071			14,112
General and administrative		22,284			23,271			51,075			53,176
Transaction costs		208			661			535			1,098
Depreciation and amortization		167,844			154,628			322,067			308,898

Total expenses		413,295			388,521			825,562			786,318

Operating income		204,926			201,273			411,135			378,170
Other income (expense)
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures		3,078			2,834			17,912			5,650
Interest and other income		1,293			2,109			2,700			3,420
Gains (losses) from investments in securities		(24	)		662			369			948
Interest expense		(108,534	)		(110,977	)		(217,291	)		(224,531	)

Income before gains on sales of real estate		100,739			95,901			214,825			163,657
Gains on sales of real estate		—			—			95,084			—

Net income		100,739			95,901			309,909			163,657
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships		(9,264	)		(7,553	)		(24,472	)		(11,907	)
Noncontrolling interest—redeemable preferred units of the Operating Partnership		(3	)		(320	)		(6	)		(939	)
Noncontrolling interest—common units of the Operating Partnership		(9,394	)		(8,883	)		(29,530	)		(15,010	)

Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc.		82,078			79,145			255,901			135,801
Preferred dividends		(2,618	)		(2,618	)		(5,207	)		(5,207	)

Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	79,460		$	76,527		$	250,694		$	130,594

Basic earnings per common share attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders:
Net income	$	0.52		$	0.50		$	1.63		$	0.85

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		153,450			153,078			153,341			153,054

Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders:
Net income	$	0.52		$	0.50		$	1.63		$	0.85

Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding		153,815			153,238			153,845			153,203

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Net income	$	100,739		$	95,901		$	309,909		$	163,657
Other comprehensive income:
Effective portion of interest rate contracts		15,639			—			12,106			—
Amortization of interest rate contracts(1)		628			624			1,255			1,253

Other comprehensive income		16,267			624			13,361			1,253

Comprehensive income		117,006			96,525			323,270			164,910
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(18,661	)		(16,756	)		(54,008	)		(27,856	)
Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(2,512	)		(64	)		(2,209	)		(126	)

Comprehensive income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc.	$	95,833		$	79,705		$	267,053		$	136,928

(1)	Amounts reclassified from comprehensive income primarily to interest expense within the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited and in thousands)


	Common Stock				Preferred Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Dividends in Excess of Earnings			Treasury Stock, at cost			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Noncontrolling Interests			Total
	Shares		Amount		Preferred Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Dividends in Excess of Earnings			Treasury Stock, at cost						Noncontrolling Interests			Total
Equity, December 31, 2014		153,114	$	1,531	$	200,000	$	6,270,257	$	(762,464	)	$	(2,722	)	$	(9,304	)	$	2,205,638		$	7,902,936
Redemption of operating partnership units to common stock		322		4		—		10,839		—			—			—			(10,843	)		—
Allocated net income for the year		—		—		—		—		255,901			—			—			49,561			305,462
Dividends/distributions declared		—		—		—		—		(204,676	)		—			—			(23,578	)		(228,254	)
Shares issued pursuant to stock purchase plan		2		—		—		313		—			—			—			—			313
Net activity from stock option and incentive plan		36		—		—		3,407		—			—			—			24,155			27,562
Contributions from noncontrolling interests in property partnerships		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			1,089			1,089
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in property partnerships		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			(34,022	)		(34,022	)
Effective portion of interest rate contracts		—		—		—		—		—			—			10,027			2,079			12,106
Amortization of interest rate contracts		—		—		—		—		—			—			1,125			130			1,255
Reallocation of noncontrolling interest		—		—		—		8,740		—			—			—			(8,740	)		—

Equity, June 30, 2015		153,474	$	1,535	$	200,000	$	6,293,556	$	(711,239	)	$	(2,722	)	$	1,848		$	2,205,469		$	7,988,447

Equity, December 31, 2013		152,983	$	1,530	$	200,000	$	5,662,453	$	(108,552	)	$	(2,722	)	$	(11,556	)	$	1,302,465		$	7,043,618
Redemption of operating partnership units to common stock		66		1		—		2,240		—			—			—			(2,241	)		—
Conversion of redeemable preferred units to common units		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			33,306			33,306
Allocated net income for the year		—		—		—		—		135,801			—			—			20,448			156,249
Dividends/distributions declared		—		—		—		—		(204,178	)		—			—			(22,673	)		(226,851	)
Shares issued pursuant to stock purchase plan		4		—		—		357		—			—			—			—			357
Net activity from stock option and incentive plan		40		—		—		3,543		—			—			—			12,899			16,442
Contributions from noncontrolling interests in property partnerships		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			1,675			1,675
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in property partnerships		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			(12,149	)		(12,149	)
Amortization of interest rate contracts		—		—		—		—		—			—			1,127			126			1,253
Reallocation of noncontrolling interest		—		—		—		10,985		—			—			—			(10,985	)		—

Equity, June 30, 2014		153,093	$	1,531	$	200,000	$	5,679,578	$	(176,929	)	$	(2,722	)	$	(10,429	)	$	1,322,871		$	7,013,900

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	For the six months ended June 30,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	309,909		$	163,657
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		322,067			308,898
Non-cash compensation expense		16,480			16,899
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures		(17,912	)		(5,650	)
Distributions of net cash flow from operations of unconsolidated joint ventures		5,769			2,205
Gains from investments in securities		(369	)		(948	)
Non-cash portion of interest expense		(21,852	)		(18,171	)
Settlement of accreted debt discount on repurchases of unsecured exchangeable senior notes		—			(92,979	)
Gains on sales of real estate		(95,084	)		—
Change in assets and liabilities:
Cash held in escrows		(175	)		(2,047	)
Tenant and other receivables, net		(8,588	)		8,116
Accrued rental income, net		(40,173	)		(21,984	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		63,545			51,442
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(5,973	)		(4,704	)
Accrued interest payable		15,016			(11,499	)
Other liabilities		(56,580	)		(39,253	)
Tenant leasing costs		(43,004	)		(44,989	)

Total adjustments		133,167			145,336

Net cash provided by operating activities		443,076			308,993

Cash flows from investing activities:
Construction in progress		(154,430	)		(206,603	)
Building and other capital improvements		(48,133	)		(37,285	)
Tenant improvements		(51,444	)		(53,935	)
Proceeds from sales of real estate		194,821			—
Proceeds from sales of real estate placed in escrow		(200,612	)		—
Proceeds from sales of real estate released from escrow		441,903			—
Cash placed in escrow for land sale contracts		(7,111	)		—
Cash released from escrow for land sale contracts		758			—
Deposit on real estate		(5,000	)		—
Capital contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures		(14,989	)		(47,767	)
Capital distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures		24,527			357
Investments in securities, net		(1,125	)		(1,338	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		179,165			(346,571	)

BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	For the six months ended June 30,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of mortgage notes payable		(12,909	)		(12,207	)
Repayment of unsecured exchangeable senior notes		—			(654,521	)
Proceeds from real estate financing transaction		6,000			—
Payments on real estate financing transaction		(1,523	)		—
Deferred financing costs		(163	)		(31	)
Net proceeds from equity transactions		332			1,162
Redemption of preferred units		(633	)		—
Dividends and distributions		(997,840	)		(612,612	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests in property partnerships		1,089			1,675
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in property partnerships		(36,922	)		(14,449	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(1,042,569	)		(1,290,983	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(420,328	)		(1,328,561	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		1,763,079			2,365,137

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	1,342,751		$	1,036,576

Supplemental disclosures:

Cash paid for interest	$	240,942		$	379,766

Interest capitalized	$	16,815		$	32,586

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Additions to real estate included in accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	17,604		$	4,831

Dividends and distributions declared but not paid	$	112,892		$	112,420

Conversions of noncontrolling interests to stockholders’ equity	$	10,843		$	2,241

Conversions of redeemable preferred units to common units	$	—		$	33,306

Issuance of restricted securities to employees	$	43,363		$	27,445

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization

Boston Properties, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”). The Company is the sole general partner of Boston Properties Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) and at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 owned an approximate 89.5% general and limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. Partnership interests in the Operating Partnership are denominated as “common units of partnership interest” (also referred to as “OP Units”), “long term incentive units of partnership interest” (also referred to as “LTIP Units”) or “preferred units of partnership interest” (also referred to as “Preferred Units”). In addition, in February 2012, the Company issued LTIP Units in connection with the granting to employees of outperformance awards (also referred to as “2012 OPP Units”). On February 6, 2015, the measurement period for the Company’s 2012 OPP Unit awards expired and the Company’s total return to shareholders (“TRS”) was sufficient for employees to earn and therefore become eligible to vest in a portion of the 2012 OPP Unit awards (See Notes 7 and 10). In February 2013, February 2014 and February 2015, the Company issued LTIP Units in connection with the granting to employees of multi-year, long-term incentive program (“MYLTIP”) awards (also referred to as “2013 MYLTIP Units,” “2014 MYLTIP Units” and “2015 MYLTIP Units,” respectively, and collectively as “MYLTIP Units”). Because the rights, preferences and privileges of MYLTIP Units differ from other LTIP Units granted to employees as part of the annual compensation process, unless specifically noted otherwise, all references to LTIP Units exclude MYLTIP Units (See Notes 7 and 10).

Unless specifically noted otherwise, all references to OP Units exclude units held by the Company. A holder of an OP Unit may present such OP Unit to the Operating Partnership for redemption at any time (subject to restrictions agreed upon at the time of issuance of OP Units to particular holders that may restrict such redemption right for a period of time, generally one year from issuance). Upon presentation of an OP Unit for redemption, the Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem such OP Unit for cash equal to the value of a share of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) at such time. In lieu of a cash redemption, the Company may elect to acquire such OP Unit for one share of Common Stock. Because the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at all times equals the number of OP Units that the Company owns, one share of Common Stock is generally the economic equivalent of one OP Unit, and the quarterly distribution that may be paid to the holder of an OP Unit equals the quarterly dividend that may be paid to the holder of a share of Common Stock. An LTIP Unit is generally the economic equivalent of a share of restricted common stock of the Company. LTIP Units, whether vested or not, will receive the same quarterly per unit distributions as OP Units, which equal per share dividends on Common Stock (See Note 8).

At June 30, 2015, there was one series of Preferred Units outstanding (i.e., Series B Preferred Units). The Series B Preferred Units were issued to the Company on March 27, 2013 in connection with the Company’s issuance of 80,000 shares (8,000,000 depositary shares each representing 1/100th of a share) of 5.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”). The Company contributed the net proceeds from the offering to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 80,000 Series B Preferred Units having terms and preferences generally mirroring those of the Series B Preferred Stock (See Note 8).

All references herein to the Company refer to Boston Properties, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership, collectively, unless the context otherwise requires.

Properties

At June 30, 2015, the Company owned or had interests in a portfolio of 170 commercial real estate properties (the “Properties”) aggregating approximately 46.3 million net rentable square feet, including thirteen properties under construction/redevelopment totaling approximately 4.2 million net rentable square feet. In

addition, the Company has structured parking for approximately 43,341 vehicles containing approximately 14.7 million square feet. At June 30, 2015, the Properties consisted of:

•

162 office properties, including 131 Class A office properties (including twelve properties under construction/redevelopment) and 31 Office/Technical properties;

•

one hotel;

•

five retail properties (including one property under construction); and

•

two residential properties.

The Company owns or controls undeveloped land parcels totaling approximately 484.4 acres.

The Company considers Class A office properties to be centrally located buildings that are professionally managed and maintained, attract high-quality tenants and command upper-tier rental rates, and that are modern structures or have been modernized to compete with newer buildings. The Company considers Office/Technical properties to be properties that support office, research and development, laboratory and other technical uses. The Company’s definitions of Class A Office and Office/Technical properties may be different than those used by other companies.

2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Boston Properties, Inc. does not have any other significant assets, liabilities or operations, other than its investment in the Operating Partnership, nor does it have employees of its own. The Operating Partnership, not Boston Properties, Inc., generally executes all significant business relationships other than transactions involving securities of Boston Properties, Inc. All majority-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures over which the Company has financial and operating control and variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which the Company has determined it is the primary beneficiary are included in the consolidated financial statements. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company accounts for all other unconsolidated joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the Company’s share of the earnings of these joint ventures and companies is included in consolidated net income.

The accompanying interim financial statements are unaudited; however, the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring matters) necessary for a fair statement of the financial statements for these interim periods have been included. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for other interim periods or for the full fiscal year. The year-end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosure required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report in the Company’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements when valuing its financial instruments for disclosure purposes. The Company determines the fair value of its unsecured senior notes using market prices. The inputs used in determining the fair value of the Company’s unsecured senior notes are categorized at a level 1 basis (as defined in the accounting standards for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures) due to the fact that the Company uses quoted market rates to value these instruments. However, the inputs used in determining the fair value could be categorized at a level 2 basis (as defined in the accounting standards for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures) if trading volumes are low. The Company determines

the fair value of its mortgage notes payable using discounted cash flow analyses by discounting the spread between the future contractual interest payments and hypothetical future interest payments on mortgage debt based on current market rates for similar securities. In determining the current market rates, the Company adds its estimates of market spreads to the quoted yields on federal government treasury securities with similar maturity dates to its debt. The inputs used in determining the fair value of the Company’s mortgage notes payable and mezzanine notes payable are categorized at a level 3 basis (as defined in the accounting standards for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures) due to the fact that the Company considers the rates used in the valuation techniques to be unobservable inputs.

Because the Company’s valuations of its financial instruments are based on these types of estimates, the actual fair values of its financial instruments may differ materially if the Company’s estimates do not prove to be accurate. The following table presents the aggregate carrying value of the Company’s indebtedness and the Company’s corresponding estimate of fair value as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):


	June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Mortgage notes payable	$	4,269,808	$	4,401,756	$	4,309,484	$	4,449,541
Mezzanine notes payable		309,148		306,130		309,796		306,156
Unsecured senior notes		5,288,503		5,602,523		5,287,704		5,645,819

Total	$	9,867,459	$	10,310,409	$	9,906,984	$	10,401,516

The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to manage its interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. To comply with the provisions of ASC 820, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. However, as of June 30, 2015, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Out-of-Period Adjustment

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded an additional allocation of net income to the noncontrolling interest holder in its Fountain Square consolidated joint venture totaling approximately $2.4 million related to the cumulative non-cash adjustment to the accretion of the changes in the redemption value of the noncontrolling interest. This resulted in the overstatement of Noncontrolling Interests in Property Partnerships by approximately $2.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and in the understatement of Noncontrolling Interests in Property Partnerships in the aggregate amount of approximately $2.4 million in previous periods. Because this adjustment was not material to the prior periods’ consolidated financial statements and the impact of recording the adjustment in the then-current period was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded the related adjustment during the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

an Entity” (“ASU 2014-08”). ASU 2014-08 clarifies that discontinued operations presentation applies only to disposals representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results (e.g., a disposal of a major geographical area, a major line of business, a major equity method investment or other major parts of an entity). ASU 2014-08 is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted, and the Company early adopted ASU 2014-08 during the first quarter of 2014. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2014-08 resulted in the operating results and gain on sale of real estate from the operating property sold during the six months ended June 30, 2015 not being reflected as Discontinued Operations in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations (See Note 3).

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASU 2015-02”). ASU 2015-02 affects reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. ASU 2015-02 modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership and affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. A reporting entity may apply the amendments in ASU 2015-02 using: (a) a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption; or (b) by applying the amendments retrospectively. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of ASU 2015-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”(“ASU 2015-03”), which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs is not affected. ASU 2015-03 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years and shall be applied on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-03 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

3. Real Estate Activity During the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Dispositions

On February 19, 2015, the Company completed the sale of a parcel of land within its Washingtonian North property located in Gaithersburg, Maryland for a gross sale price of $8.7 million. Net cash proceeds totaled approximately $8.3 million, resulting in a gain on sale of real estate totaling approximately $3.7 million. The parcel contains approximately 8.5 acres of the Company’s approximately 27 acre property.

On March 17, 2015, the Company completed the sale of its Residences on The Avenue property located in Washington, DC for a gross sale price of $196.0 million. Net cash proceeds totaled approximately $192.5 million, resulting in a gain on sale of real estate totaling approximately $91.4 million. The Company has agreed to provide net operating income support of up to $6.0 million should the property’s net operating income fail to achieve certain thresholds. This amount has been recorded as a reduction to the gain on sale. The Residences on The Avenue is comprised of 335 apartment units and approximately 50,000 net rentable square feet of retail space, subject to a ground lease that expires on February 1, 2068. The Residences on The Avenue contributed approximately $1.1 million of net income to the Company for the period from January 1, 2015 through March 16, 2015 and $0.9 million and $1.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

Redevelopment

On May 1, 2015, the Company commenced the redevelopment of Reservoir Place North, a Class A office project with approximately 73,000 net rentable square feet located in Waltham, Massachusetts.

4. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The investments in unconsolidated joint ventures consist of the following at June 30, 2015:


					Carrying Value of Investment(1)
Entity	Properties	Nominal % Ownership			June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
					(in thousands)
Square 407 Limited Partnership	Market Square North		50.0	%	$	(10,161	)	$	(8,022	)
The Metropolitan Square Associates LLC	Metropolitan Square		51.0	%		9,188			8,539
BP/CRF 901 New York Avenue LLC	901 New York Avenue		25.0	%(2)		(12,411	)		(1,080	)
WP Project Developer LLC	Wisconsin Place Land and Infrastructure		33.3	%(3)		44,597			45,514
Annapolis Junction NFM, LLC	Annapolis Junction		50.0	%(4)		26,812			25,246
540 Madison Venture LLC	540 Madison Avenue		60.0	%		68,627			68,128
500 North Capitol LLC	500 North Capitol Street, NW		30.0	%		(2,755	)		(2,250	)
501 K Street LLC	1001 6th Street		50.0	%(5)		42,704			41,736
Podium Developer LLC	North Station (Phase I—Air Rights)		50.0	%		6,609			4,231
1265 Main Office JV LLC	1265 Main Street		50.0	%		2,209			N/A
BNY Tower Holdings LLC	Dock72 at the Brooklyn Navy Yard		50.0	%		9,228			N/A

					$	184,647		$	182,042

(1)	Investments with deficit balances aggregating approximately $25.3 million and $11.4 million at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, have been reflected within Other Liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(2)	The Company’s economic ownership has increased based on the achievement of certain return thresholds.

(3)	The Company’s wholly-owned entity that owns the office component of the project also owns a 33.3% interest in the entity owning the land, parking garage and infrastructure of the project.

(4)	The joint venture owns two in-service buildings, two buildings under construction and two undeveloped land parcels.

(5)	Under the joint venture agreement, the partner will be entitled to up to two additional payments from the venture based on increases in total square footage of the project above 520,000 square feet and achieving certain project returns at stabilization.

Certain of the Company’s unconsolidated joint venture agreements include provisions whereby, at certain specified times, each partner has the right to initiate a purchase or sale of its interest in the joint ventures at an agreed upon fair value. Under these provisions, the Company is not compelled to purchase the interest of its outside joint venture partners.

The combined summarized balance sheets of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures are as follows:


	June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(in thousands)
ASSETS
Real estate and development in process, net	$	1,038,567		$	1,034,552
Other assets		243,773			264,097

Total assets	$	1,282,340		$	1,298,649

LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’/PARTNERS’ EQUITY
Mortgage and notes payable	$	832,860		$	830,075
Other liabilities		35,483			34,211
Members’/Partners’ equity		413,997			434,363

Total liabilities and members’/partners’ equity	$	1,282,340		$	1,298,649

Company’s share of equity	$	212,065		$	209,828
Basis differentials(1)		(27,418	)		(27,786	)

Carrying value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures(2)	$	184,647		$	182,042

(1)	This amount represents the aggregate difference between the Company’s historical cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level, which is typically amortized over the life of the related assets and

liabilities. Basis differentials occur from impairment of investments and upon the transfer of assets that were previously owned by the Company into a joint venture. In addition, certain acquisition, transaction and other costs may not be reflected in the net assets at the joint venture level.

(2)	Investments with deficit balances aggregating approximately $25.3 million and $11.4 million at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, have been reflected within Other Liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The combined summarized statements of operations of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures are as follows:


	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Total revenue(1)	$	39,152	$	38,437	$	78,684		$	76,471
Expenses
Operating		15,824		15,461		32,099			30,925
Depreciation and amortization		8,951		9,167		18,022			18,259

Total expenses		24,775		24,628		50,121			49,184

Operating income		14,377		13,809		28,563			27,287
Other expense
Interest expense		7,986		7,984		15,966			15,996

Net income	$	6,391	$	5,825	$	12,597		$	11,291

Company’s share of net income	$	2,902	$	2,578	$	17,544	(2)	$	5,203
Basis differential		176		256		368			447

Income from unconsolidated joint ventures	$	3,078	$	2,834	$	17,912		$	5,650

(1)

Includes straight-line rent adjustments of approximately $0.3 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and approximately $2.0 million and $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. Includes net above-/below-market rent adjustments of approximately $(0.1) million and $(0.1) million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and approximately $(0.1) million and $0.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(2)

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company received a distribution of approximately $24.5 million, which was generated from the excess loan proceeds from the refinancing of 901 New York Avenue’s mortgage loan to a new 10-year mortgage loan totaling $225.0 million. The Company’s allocation of income and distributions for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was not proportionate to its nominal ownership interest as a result of the achievement of specified investment return thresholds, as provided for in the joint venture agreement.

On May 8, 2015, the Company entered into a joint venture with an unrelated third party to redevelop an existing building into a Class A office building totaling approximately 115,000 net rentable square feet at 1265 Main Street in Waltham, Massachusetts. The joint venture partner contributed real estate and improvements, with an aggregate fair value of approximately $9.4 million, for its initial 50% interest in the joint venture. For its initial 50% interest, the Company will contribute cash totaling approximately $9.4 million as the joint venture incurs costs. The joint venture has entered into a fifteen-year lease with a tenant to occupy 100% of the building.

On June 26, 2015, the Company entered into a joint venture with an unrelated third party to develop Dock72, an office building totaling approximately 670,000 net rentable square feet located at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in Brooklyn, New York. Each partner contributed cash totaling approximately $9.1 million for their initial 50% interest in the joint venture. The joint venture entered into a 96-year ground lease, comprised of an initial

term of 46 years, which may be extended by the joint venture to 2111, subject to certain conditions. The joint venture also entered into a 20-year lease with a tenant to occupy approximately 222,000 net rentable square feet at the building. In addition, the joint venture entered into an option agreement pursuant to which it may lease an additional land parcel at the site, which could support between 600,000 and 1,000,000 net rentable square feet of development. In connection with the execution of the option agreement, the joint venture paid a non-refundable option payment of $1.0 million.

5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

On February 19, 2015, the Company commenced a planned interest rate hedging program. The Company entered into eight forward-starting interest rate swap contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2015, which fix the 10-year swap rate at a weighted-average rate of approximately 2.458% per annum on notional amounts aggregating $325.0 million. These interest rate swap contracts were entered into in advance of a financing with a target commencement date in September 2016 and maturity in September 2026 (See Note 12). In addition, 767 Fifth Partners LLC, which is the consolidated entity (in which the Company has a 60% interest and owns 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building) in New York City), entered into five forward-starting interest rate swap contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2015, which fix the 10-year swap rate at a weighted-average rate of approximately 2.793% per annum on notional amounts aggregating $150.0 million. These interest rate swap contracts were entered into in advance of a financing with a target commencement date in June 2017 and maturity in June 2027 (See Note 12). The Company’s interest rate swap contracts consisted of the following at June 30, 2015:


Derivative Instrument	Notional Amount		Effective Date	Maturity Date	Strike Rate			Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
	(in thousands)								(in thousands)
Boston Properties Limited Partnership:

Interest Rate Swap	$	50,000	September 1, 2016	September 1, 2026		2.571	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets	$	1,003
Interest Rate Swap		75,000	September 1, 2016	September 1, 2026		2.476	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		2,172
Interest Rate Swap		50,000	September 1, 2016	September 1, 2026		2.523	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		1,215
Interest Rate Swap		50,000	September 1, 2016	September 1, 2026		2.480	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		1,402
Interest Rate Swap		25,000	September 1, 2016	September 1, 2026		2.348	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		1,008
Interest Rate Swap		25,000	September 1, 2016	September 1, 2026		2.249	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		1,208
Interest Rate Swap		25,000	September 1, 2016	September 1, 2026		2.242	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		1,242
Interest Rate Swap		25,000	September 1, 2016	September 1, 2026		2.541	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		567

	$	325,000				2.458	%		$	9,817

767 Fifth Partners LLC:

Interest Rate Swap	$	25,000	June 7, 2017	June 7, 2027		2.683	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets	$	618
Interest Rate Swap		50,000	June 7, 2017	June 7, 2027		2.677	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		1,261
Interest Rate Swap		25,000	June 7, 2017	June 7, 2027		2.913	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		123
Interest Rate Swap		25,000	June 7, 2017	June 7, 2027		2.857	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		244
Interest Rate Swap		25,000	June 7, 2017	June 7, 2027		2.950	%	Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets		43

	$	150,000				2.793	%		$	2,289

	$	475,000							$	12,106

The Company entered into the interest rate swap contracts designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to reduce its exposure to the variability in future cash flows attributable to changes in the 10-year swap rate in contemplation of obtaining 10-year fixed-rate financing in September 2016. The Company’s 767 Fifth Partners LLC consolidated entity entered into the interest rate swap contracts designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to reduce its exposure to the variability in future cash flows attributable to changes in the 10-year swap rate in contemplation of obtaining 10-year fixed-rate financing in June 2017. The Company has formally documented all of its relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Company also assesses and documents, both at the hedging instrument’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows associated with the hedged items. All components of the forward-starting interest rate swap contracts were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if repayment of the Company’s indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to the Company’s default on the indebtedness. As of June 30, 2015, the fair value of derivatives in a net asset position, which excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk and excludes accrued interest, related to these agreements was approximately $12.1 million. As of June 30, 2015, the Company has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at June 30, 2015, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value and would have received approximately $12.1 million. The Company accounts for the effective portion of changes in the fair value of a derivative in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassifies the effective portion to earnings over the term that the hedged transaction affects earnings. The Company accounts for the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of a derivative directly in earnings. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company has recorded the changes in fair value of the swap contracts related to the effective portion of the interest rate contracts aggregating approximately $12.1 million in Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) within the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company did not record any hedge ineffectiveness. The Company does not expect to reclassify into earnings any amounts recorded within Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) relating to the forward-starting interest rate swap contracts within the next twelve months.

The following table presents the location in the financial statements of the gains or losses recognized related to the Company’s cash flow hedges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Amount of gain related to the effective portion recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	15,639		$	—		$	12,106		$	—

Amount of loss related to the effective portion subsequently reclassified to earnings(1)	$	(628	)	$	(624	)	$	(1,255	)	$	(1,253	)

Amount of gain (loss) related to the ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

(1)	Consists of amounts from previous interest rate hedging programs.

The following table reflects the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):


Balance at December 31, 2014	$	(9,304	)
Effective portion of interest rate contracts		12,106
Amortization of interest rate contracts(1)		1,255
Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(2,209	)

Balance at June 30, 2015	$	1,848


Balance at December 31, 2013	$	(11,556	)
Amortization of interest rate contracts(1)		1,253
Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(126	)

Balance at June 30, 2014	$	(10,429	)

(1)	Consists of amounts from previous interest rate hedging programs.

6. Commitments and Contingencies

General

In the normal course of business, the Company guarantees its performance of services or indemnifies third parties against its negligence. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Company guarantees to certain tenants the obligations of its subsidiaries for the payment of tenant improvement allowances and brokerage commissions in connection with their leases and limited costs arising from delays in delivery of their premises.

The Company has letter of credit and performance obligations related to lender and development requirements that total approximately $23.5 million.

Certain of the Company’s joint venture agreements include provisions whereby, at certain specified times, each partner has the right to initiate a purchase or sale of its interest in the joint ventures. With limited exception, under these provisions, the Company is not compelled to purchase the interest of its outside joint venture partners (See also Note 7). Under certain of the Company’s joint venture agreements, if certain return thresholds are achieved the partners will be entitled to an additional promoted interest or payments.

In connection with the assumption of 767 Fifth Avenue’s (the General Motors Building) secured loan by the Company’s consolidated entity, 767 Venture, LLC, the Company guaranteed the consolidated joint venture’s obligation to fund various escrows, including tenant improvements, taxes and insurance in lieu of cash deposits. As of June 30, 2015, the maximum funding obligation under the guarantee was approximately $29.5 million. The Company earns a fee from the joint venture for providing the guarantee and has an agreement with the outside partners to reimburse the joint venture for their share of any payments made under the guarantee.

In connection with 767 Fifth Partners LLC entering into interest rate swap contracts (See Note 5), the Company guaranteed 767 Fifth Partners LLC’s obligations under the hedging agreements in favor of each hedge counterparty. 767 Fifth Partners LLC is the entity that owns 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building). It is a subsidiary of 767 Venture, LLC, a consolidated entity in which the Company has a 60% interest. The Company earns a fee from the joint venture for providing the guarantee and has an agreement with the outside partners to reimburse the joint venture for their share of any payments made under the guarantee.

In connection with the mortgage financing collateralized by the Company’s 200 Clarendon Street (formerly the John Hancock Tower) property located in Boston, Massachusetts, the Company has agreed to guarantee approximately $25.3 million related to its obligations to provide funds for certain tenant re-leasing costs. The mortgage financing will mature on January 6, 2017.

In connection with the mortgage financing collateralized by the Company’s consolidated joint venture’s Fountain Square property located in Reston, Virginia, the Company has agreed to guarantee approximately $0.7 million related to its obligation to provide funds for certain tenant re-leasing costs. The mortgage financing will mature on October 11, 2016.

From time to time, the Company (or the applicable joint venture) has also agreed to guarantee portions of the principal, interest or other amounts in connection with other unconsolidated joint venture borrowings. In addition to the financial guarantees referenced above, the Company has agreed to customary environmental indemnifications and nonrecourse carve-outs (e.g., guarantees against fraud, misrepresentation and bankruptcy) on certain of its unconsolidated joint venture loans.

In 2009, the Company filed a general unsecured creditor’s claim against Lehman Brothers, Inc. for approximately $45.3 million related to its rejection of a lease at 399 Park Avenue in New York City. On January 10, 2014, the trustee for the liquidation of the business of Lehman Brothers allowed the Company’s claim in the amount of approximately $45.2 million. During 2014, the Company received an initial distribution totaling approximately $7.7 million. On March 11, 2015, the Company received a second interim distribution totaling approximately $4.5 million, which is included in Base Rent in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015, leaving a remaining claim of approximately $33.0 million. The Company will continue to evaluate whether to attempt to sell the remaining claim or wait until the trustee distributes proceeds from the Lehman Brothers estate. Given the inherent uncertainties in bankruptcy proceedings, there can be no assurance as to the timing or amount of proceeds, if any, that the Company may ultimately realize on the remaining claim, whether by sale to a third party or by one or more distributions from the trustee. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any estimated recoveries associated with this gain contingency within its consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2015.

Insurance

The Company carries insurance coverage on its properties of types and in amounts and with deductibles that it believes are in line with coverage customarily obtained by owners of similar properties. In response to the uncertainty in the insurance market following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Federal Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (as amended, “TRIA”) was enacted in November 2002 to require regulated insurers to make available coverage for “certified” acts of terrorism (as defined by the statute). The expiration date of TRIA was extended to December 31, 2014 by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 and further extended to December 31, 2020 by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 (“TRIPRA”), and the Company can provide no assurance that it will be extended further. Currently, the Company’s property insurance program per occurrence limits are $1.0 billion for its portfolio insurance program, including coverage for acts of terrorism other than nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological terrorism (“Terrorism Coverage”). The Company also carries $250 million of Terrorism Coverage for 601 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York (“601 Lexington Avenue”) in excess of the $1.0 billion of coverage in the Company’s property insurance program. Certain properties, including the General Motors Building located at 767 Fifth Avenue in New York, New York (“767 Fifth Avenue”), are currently insured in separate insurance programs. The property insurance program per occurrence limits for 767 Fifth Avenue are $1.625 billion, including Terrorism Coverage. The Company also currently carries nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological terrorism insurance coverage for acts of terrorism certified under TRIA (“NBCR Coverage”), which is provided by IXP as a direct insurer, for the properties in our portfolio, including 767 Fifth Avenue, but excluding certain other properties owned in joint ventures with third parties or which the Company manages. The per occurrence limit for NBCR Coverage is $1.0 billion. Under TRIA, after the payment of the required deductible and coinsurance, the NBCR Coverage provided by IXP is backstopped by the Federal Government if the aggregate industry insured losses resulting from a certified act of terrorism exceed a “program trigger.” In 2015, the program trigger is $100 million and the coinsurance is 15%, however, both will increase in subsequent years pursuant to TRIPRA. If the Federal Government pays out for a loss under TRIA, it is mandatory that the Federal Government recoup the full amount of the loss from insurers offering TRIA coverage after the payment of the loss pursuant to a formula in TRIPRA. The Company may elect to terminate the NBCR Coverage if the Federal

Government seeks recoupment for losses paid under TRIA, if there is a change in its portfolio or for any other reason. The Company intends to continue to monitor the scope, nature and cost of available terrorism insurance and maintain terrorism insurance in amounts and on terms that are commercially reasonable.

The Company also currently carries earthquake insurance on its properties located in areas known to be subject to earthquakes in an amount and subject to self-insurance that the Company believes is commercially reasonable. In addition, this insurance is subject to a deductible in the amount of 5% of the value of the affected property. Specifically, the Company currently carries earthquake insurance which covers its San Francisco region (excluding Salesforce Tower) with a $170 million per occurrence limit (increased on March 1, 2015 from $120 million), and a $170 million annual aggregate limit (increased on March 1, 2015 from $120 million), $20 million of which is provided by IXP, as a direct insurer. The builders risk policy maintained for the development of Salesforce Tower in San Francisco includes a $60 million per occurrence and annual aggregate limit of earthquake coverage. The amount of the Company’s earthquake insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover losses from earthquakes. In addition, the amount of earthquake coverage could impact the Company’s ability to finance properties subject to earthquake risk. The Company may discontinue earthquake insurance or change the structure of its earthquake insurance program on some or all of its properties in the future if the premiums exceed the Company’s estimation of the value of the coverage.

IXP, a captive insurance company which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, acts as a direct insurer with respect to a portion of the Company’s earthquake insurance coverage for its Greater San Francisco properties and the Company’s NBCR Coverage. Insofar as the Company owns IXP, it is responsible for its liquidity and capital resources, and the accounts of IXP are part of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In particular, if a loss occurs which is covered by the Company’s NBCR Coverage but is less than the applicable program trigger under TRIA, IXP would be responsible for the full amount of the loss without any backstop by the Federal Government. IXP would also be responsible for any recoupment charges by the Federal Government in the event losses are paid out and its insurance policy is maintained after the payout by the Federal Government. If the Company experiences a loss and IXP is required to pay under its insurance policy, the Company would ultimately record the loss to the extent of the required payment. Therefore, insurance coverage provided by IXP should not be considered as the equivalent of third-party insurance, but rather as a modified form of self-insurance. In addition, the Operating Partnership has issued a guarantee to cover liabilities of IXP in the amount of $20.0 million.

The mortgages on the Company’s properties typically contain requirements concerning the financial ratings of the insurers who provide policies covering the property. The Company provides the lenders on a regular basis with the identity of the insurance companies in the Company’s insurance programs. The ratings of some of the Company’s insurers are below the rating requirements in some of the Company’s loan agreements and the lenders for these loans could attempt to claim that an event of default has occurred under the loan. The Company believes it could obtain insurance with insurers which satisfy the rating requirements. Additionally, in the future, the Company’s ability to obtain debt financing secured by individual properties, or the terms of such financing, may be adversely affected if lenders generally insist on ratings for insurers or amounts of insurance which are difficult to obtain or which result in a commercially unreasonable premium. There can be no assurance that a deficiency in the financial ratings of one or more of the Company’s insurers will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Company continues to monitor the state of the insurance market in general, and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism and California earthquake risk in particular, but the Company cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in future policy years. There are other types of losses, such as from wars, for which the Company cannot obtain insurance at all or at a reasonable cost. With respect to such losses and losses from acts of terrorism, earthquakes or other catastrophic events, if the Company experiences a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds policy limits, the Company could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties, as well as the anticipated future revenues from those properties. Depending on the specific circumstances of each affected property, it is possible that the Company could be liable for mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the property. Any such loss could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business and financial condition and results of operations.

7. Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests relate to the interests in the Operating Partnership not owned by the Company and interests in consolidated property partnerships not wholly-owned by the Company. As of June 30, 2015, the noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership consisted of 16,192,518 OP Units, 1,839,555 LTIP Units (including 216,960 2012 OPP Units), 309,818 2013 MYLTIP Units, 476,320 2014 MYLTIP Units and 368,415 2015 MYLTIP Units held by parties other than the Company.

Noncontrolling Interest—Redeemable Preferred Units of the Operating Partnership

On June 25, 2015, the Company’s Operating Partnership redeemed the remaining 12,667 Series Four Preferred Units for cash totaling approximately $0.6 million, plus accrued and unpaid distributions. The Series Four Preferred Units bore a preferred distribution equal to 2.00% per annum on a liquidation preference of $50.00 per unit and were not convertible into OP Units. The holders of Series Four Preferred Units had the right, at certain times and subject to certain conditions set forth in the Certificate of Designations establishing the rights, limitations and preferences of the Series Four Preferred Units, to require the Operating Partnership to redeem all of their units for cash at the redemption price of $50.00 per unit. The Operating Partnership also had the right, at certain times and subject to certain conditions, to redeem all of the Series Four Preferred Units for cash at the redemption price of $50.00 per unit. In order to secure the performance of certain post-issuance obligations by the holders, all of such outstanding Series Four Preferred Units were subject to forfeiture pursuant to the terms of a pledge agreement and not eligible for redemption until and unless such security interest was released. On May 19, 2014, the Company’s Operating Partnership released to the holders 319,687 Series Four Preferred Units that were previously subject to the security interest. On July 3, 2014, the Company’s Operating Partnership redeemed such units for cash totaling approximately $16.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid distributions. On October 16, 2014, the Company’s Operating Partnership released to the holders 27,773 Series Four Preferred Units that were previously subject to the security interest under the pledge agreement. On November 5, 2014, the Company’s Operating Partnership redeemed such units for cash totaling approximately $1.4 million. Due to the holders’ redemption option existing outside the control of the Company, the Series Four Preferred Units were presented outside of permanent equity in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

On February 17, 2015, the Operating Partnership paid a distribution on its outstanding Series Four Preferred Units of $0.25 per unit. On May 15, 2015, the Operating Partnership paid a distribution on its outstanding Series Four Preferred Units of $0.25 per unit.

The following table reflects the activity of the noncontrolling interests—redeemable preferred units of the Operating Partnership for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):


Balance at December 31, 2014	$	633
Net income		6
Distributions		(6	)
Redemption of redeemable preferred units (Series Four Preferred Units)		(633	)

Balance at June 30, 2015	$	—


Balance at December 31, 2013	$	51,312
Net income		939
Distributions		(939	)
Conversion of redeemable preferred units (Series Two Preferred Units) to common units		(33,306	)

Balance at June 30, 2014	$	18,006

Noncontrolling Interest—Redeemable Interest in Property Partnership

On October 4, 2012, the Company completed the formation of a joint venture that owns and operates Fountain Square located in Reston, Virginia. The joint venture partner contributed the property valued at

approximately $385.0 million and related mortgage indebtedness totaling approximately $211.3 million for a nominal 50% interest in the joint venture. The Company contributed cash totaling approximately $87.0 million for its nominal 50% interest, which cash was distributed to the joint venture partner. Pursuant to the joint venture agreement (i) the Company has rights to acquire the partner’s nominal 50% interest and (ii) the partner has the right to cause the Company to acquire the partner’s interest on January 4, 2016, in each case at a fixed price totaling approximately $102.0 million in cash. The fixed price option rights expire on January 31, 2016 (See Note 12). The Company is consolidating this joint venture due to the Company’s right to acquire the partner’s nominal 50% interest. The Company recorded the noncontrolling interest at its acquisition-date fair value as temporary equity, due to the redemption option existing outside the control of the Company. The Company accretes the changes in the redemption value quarterly over the period from the acquisition date to the earliest redemption date using the effective interest method. The Company records the accretion after the allocation of net income and distributions of cash flow to the noncontrolling interest account balance.

The following table reflects the activity of the noncontrolling interest—redeemable interest in property partnership in the Company’s Fountain Square consolidated entity for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):


Balance at December 31, 2014	$	104,692
Net loss		(24	)
Distributions		(2,900	)
Adjustment to reflect redeemable interest at redemption value		4,465

Balance at June 30, 2015	$	106,233


Balance at December 31, 2013	$	99,609
Net loss		(240	)
Distributions		(2,300	)
Adjustment to reflect redeemable interest at redemption value		6,709	(1)

Balance at June 30, 2014	$	103,778

(1)	Includes an out-of-period adjustment totaling approximately $2.4 million (See Note 2).

Noncontrolling Interest—Common Units of the Operating Partnership

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, 321,700 OP Units were presented by the holders for redemption (including 57,701 OP Units issued upon conversion of LTIP Units) and were redeemed by the Company in exchange for an equal number of shares of Common Stock.

At June 30, 2015, the Company had outstanding 309,818 2013 MYLTIP Units, 476,320 2014 MYLTIP Units and 368,415 2015 MYLTIP Units. Prior to the measurement date (February 4, 2016 for 2013 MYLTIP Units, February 3, 2017 for 2014 MYLTIP Units and February 4, 2018 for 2015 MYLTIP Units), holders of MYLTIP Units will be entitled to receive per unit distributions equal to one-tenth (10%) of the regular quarterly distributions payable on an OP Unit, but will not be entitled to receive any special distributions. After the measurement date, the number of MYLTIP Units, both vested and unvested, that MYLTIP award recipients have earned, if any, based on the establishment of a performance pool, will be entitled to receive distributions in an amount per unit equal to distributions, both regular and special, payable on an OP Unit.

On February 6, 2015, the measurement period for the Company’s 2012 OPP Unit awards ended and the Company’s TRS performance was sufficient for employees to earn and therefore become eligible to vest in a portion of the 2012 OPP Unit awards. The final outperformance pool was determined to be approximately $32.1 million, or approximately 80% of the total maximum outperformance pool of $40.0 million. As a result, 174,549 2012 OPP Units were automatically forfeited.

On January 28, 2015, the Operating Partnership paid a special cash distribution on the OP Units and LTIP Units in the amount of $4.50 per unit, a regular quarterly cash distribution on the OP Units and LTIP Units in the amount of $0.65 per unit, and a regular quarterly distribution on the 2012 OPP Units, 2013 MYLTIP Units and 2014 MYLTIP Units in the amount of $0.065 per unit, to holders of record as of the close of business on December 31, 2014. The special cash distribution was in addition to the regular quarterly distribution on the OP Units and LTIP Units. Unless and until they are earned, holders of OPP Units and MYLTIP Units are not entitled to receive any special distributions. On April 30, 2015, the Operating Partnership paid a distribution on the OP Units and LTIP Units in the amount of $0.65 per unit, a distribution on the 2012 OPP Units in the amount of $0.416 per unit (representing a blended rate for periods prior to and after February 6, 2015, which was the valuation date for the 2012 Outperformance Plan), and a distribution on the 2013 MYLTIP Units, 2014 MYLTIP Units and 2015 MYLTIP Units in the amount of $0.065 per unit, to holders of record as of the close of business on March 31, 2015. On June 17, 2015, Boston Properties, Inc., as general partner of the Operating Partnership, declared a distribution on the OP Units and LTIP Units (including the 2012 OPP Units) in the amount of $0.65 per unit and a distribution on the 2013 MYLTIP Units, 2014 MYLTIP Units and 2015 MYLTIP Units in the amount of $0.065 per unit, in each case payable on July 31, 2015 to holders of record as of the close of business on June 30, 2015.

A holder of an OP Unit may present such OP Unit to the Operating Partnership for redemption at any time (subject to restrictions agreed upon at the time of issuance of OP Units to particular holders that may restrict such redemption right for a period of time, generally one year from issuance). Upon presentation of an OP Unit for redemption, the Operating Partnership must redeem such OP Unit for cash equal to the then value of a share of common stock of the Company. The Company may, in its sole discretion, elect to assume and satisfy the redemption obligation by paying either cash or issuing one share of Common Stock. The value of the OP Units not owned by the Company and LTIP Units (including the 2012 OPP Units) assuming that all conditions had been met for the conversion thereof had all of such units been redeemed at June 30, 2015 was approximately $2.2 billion based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock of $121.04 per share on June 30, 2015. The Company’s calculation of Noncontrolling Interest—Common Units of the Operating Partnership in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations includes OP Units and vested LTIP Units (including vested 2012 OPP Units).

Noncontrolling Interests—Property Partnerships

The noncontrolling interests in property partnerships consist of the outside equity interests in ventures that are consolidated with the financial results of the Company because the Company exercises control over the entities that own the properties. The equity interests in these ventures that are not owned by the Company, totaling approximately $1.6 billion at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, are included in Noncontrolling Interests—Property Partnerships on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table reflects the activity of the noncontrolling interests in property partnerships for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):


Balance at December 31, 2014	$	1,602,467
Capital contributions		1,089
Net income		20,031
Accumulated other comprehensive income		916
Distributions		(34,022	)

Balance at June 30, 2015	$	1,590,481


Balance at December 31, 2013	$	726,132
Capital contributions		1,675
Net income		5,438
Distributions		(12,149	)

Balance at June 30, 2014	$	721,096

8. Stockholders’ Equity

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had 153,473,931 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

On June 3, 2014, the Company established an “at the market” (“ATM”) stock offering program through which it may sell from time to time up to an aggregate of $600.0 million of its common stock through sales agents over a three-year period. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from any offering for general business purposes, which may include investment opportunities and debt reduction. No shares of common stock have been issued under this ATM stock offering program since its inception.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company issued 321,700 shares of Common Stock in connection with the redemption of an equal number of redeemable OP Units from third parties.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company issued 11,447 shares of Common Stock upon the exercise of options to purchase Common Stock by certain employees.

On January 28, 2015, the Company paid a special cash dividend and regular quarterly dividend aggregating $5.15 per share of Common Stock to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 31, 2014. On April 30, 2015, the Company paid a dividend of $0.65 per share of Common Stock to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 31, 2015. On June 17, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.65 per share of Common Stock payable on July 31, 2015 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on June 30, 2015.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had 80,000 shares (8,000,000 depositary shares each representing 1/100th of a share) outstanding of its 5.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock with a liquidation preference of $2,500.00 per share ($25.00 per depositary share). The Company pays cumulative cash dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock at a rate of 5.25% per annum of the $2,500.00 liquidation preference per share. The Company may not redeem the Series B Preferred Stock prior to March 27, 2018, except in certain circumstances relating to the preservation of the Company’s REIT status. On or after March 27, 2018, the Company, at its option, may redeem the Series B Preferred Stock for a cash redemption price of $2,500.00 per share ($25.00 per depositary share), plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series B Preferred Stock is not redeemable by the holders, has no maturity date and is not convertible into any other security of the Company or its affiliates.

On February 17, 2015, the Company paid a dividend on its outstanding Series B Preferred Stock of $32.8125 per share. On May 15, 2015, the Company paid a dividend on its outstanding Series B Preferred Stock of $32.8125 per share. On June 17, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $32.8125 per share of Series B Preferred Stock payable on August 17, 2015 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 5, 2015.

9. Earnings Per Share

The following table provides a reconciliation of both the net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders and the number of common shares used in the computation of basic earnings per share (“EPS”), which is calculated by dividing net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are also participating securities. As such, unvested restricted common stock of the Company, LTIP Units, 2012 OPP Units and MYLTIP Units are considered participating securities. Participating securities are included in the computation of basic EPS of the Company using the two-class method. Participating securities are included in the computation of diluted EPS of the Company using the if-converted method if the impact is dilutive. Because the 2012 OPP Units required and the MYLTIP Units require the Company to outperform absolute and relative return thresholds, unless such thresholds have been met by the end of the applicable reporting period, the Company excludes such units from the diluted EPS calculation. Other potentially dilutive common shares, including stock options, restricted stock and other securities of the Operating Partnership that are exchangeable for the Company’s Common Stock, and the related impact on earnings, are considered when calculating diluted EPS.


	For the three months ended June 30, 2015
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)		Per Share Amount
	(in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Basic Earnings:
Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	79,460		153,450	$	0.52
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
Stock Based Compensation		—		365		—

Diluted Earnings:
Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	79,460		153,815	$	0.52


	For the three months ended June 30, 2014
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)		Per Share Amount
	(in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Basic Earnings:
Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	76,527		153,078	$	0.50
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
Stock Based Compensation		—		160		—

Diluted Earnings:
Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	76,527		153,238	$	0.50


	For the six months ended June 30, 2015
	Income (Numerator)			Shares (Denominator)		Per Share Amount
	(in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Basic Earnings:
Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	250,694			153,341	$	1.63
Allocation of undistributed earnings to participating securities		(141	)		—		—

Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	250,553			153,341	$	1.63
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
Stock Based Compensation		—			504		—

Diluted Earnings:
Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	250,553			153,845	$	1.63


	For the six months ended June 30, 2014
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)		Per Share Amount
	(in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Basic Earnings:
Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	130,594		153,054	$	0.85
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
Stock Based Compensation		—		149		—

Diluted Earnings:
Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	130,594		153,203	$	0.85

10. Stock Option and Incentive Plan

On January 21, 2015, the Company’s Compensation Committee approved the 2015 Multi-Year, Long-Term Incentive Program awards under the Company’s 2012 Plan to certain officers and employees of the Company. The 2015 MYLTIP awards utilize TRS over a three-year measurement period, on an annualized, compounded basis, as the performance metric. Earned awards will be based on the Company’s TRS relative to (i) the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Portfolio Index (50% weight) and (ii) the NAREIT Office Index adjusted to exclude the Company (50% weight). Earned awards will range from $0 to a maximum of approximately $40.8 million depending on the Company’s TRS relative to the two indices, with three tiers (threshold: approximately $8.2 million; target: approximately $16.3 million; high: approximately $40.8 million) and linear interpolation between tiers. Earned awards measured on the basis of relative TRS performance are subject to an absolute TRS component in the form of relatively simple modifiers that (A) reduce the level of earned awards in the event the Company’s annualized TRS is less than 0% and (B) cause some awards to be earned in the event the Company’s annualized TRS is more than 12% even though on a relative basis alone the Company’s TRS would not result in any earned awards.

Earned awards (if any) will vest 50% on February 4, 2018 and 50% on February 4, 2019, based on continued employment. Vesting will be accelerated in the event of a change in control, termination of employment by the Company without cause, or termination of employment by the award recipient for good reason, death, disability or retirement. If there is a change of control prior to February 4, 2018, earned awards will be calculated based on TRS performance up to the date of the change of control. The 2015 MYLTIP awards are in the form of LTIP Units issued on the grant date which (i) are subject to forfeiture to the extent awards are not earned and (ii) prior to the performance measurement date are only entitled to one-tenth (10%) of the regular quarterly distributions payable on common partnership units.

Under the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718 “Compensation-Stock Compensation,” the 2015 MYLTIP awards have an aggregate value of approximately $15.7 million, which amount will generally be amortized into earnings over the four-year plan period under the graded vesting method.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company issued 34,150 shares of restricted common stock, 190,563 LTIP Units (including 85,962 LTIP Units issued on January 1, 2015 to Mortimer B. Zuckerman, non-executive Chairman of the Board, pursuant to the Transition Benefits Agreement dated March 10, 2013) and 375,000 2015 MYLTIP Units to employees and non-employee directors under the 2012 Plan. Employees and non-employee directors paid $0.01 per share of restricted common stock and $0.25 per LTIP Unit and 2015 MYLTIP Unit. An LTIP Unit is generally the economic equivalent of a share of restricted stock in the Company. The aggregate value of the LTIP Units is included in noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Grants of restricted stock and LTIP Units to employees vest in four equal annual installments. Restricted stock is measured at fair value on the date of grant based on the number of shares granted, as adjusted for forfeitures, and the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange. Such value is recognized as an expense ratably over the corresponding employee service period. The shares of restricted stock granted during the six months ended June 30, 2015 were valued at approximately $4.8 million ($140.88 per share weighted-average). The LTIP Units granted (excluding the number issued to Mr. Zuckerman, as discussed above) were valued at approximately $13.5 million ($128.94 per unit weighted-average fair value) using a Monte Carlo simulation method model. The per unit fair values of the LTIP Units granted were estimated on the dates of grant and for a substantial majority of such units were valued using the following assumptions: an expected life of 5.7 years, a risk-free interest rate of 1.47% and an expected price volatility of 26%. The value of the LTIP Units issued to Mr. Zuckerman was expensed between March 2013 and July 2014 in accordance with the vesting schedule set forth in the Transition Benefits Agreement. As the 2012 OPP Units, 2013 MYLTIP Units, 2014 MYLTIP Units and 2015 MYLTIP Units are subject to both a service condition and a market condition, the Company recognizes the compensation expense related to the 2012 OPP Units, 2013 MYLTIP Units, 2014 MYLTIP Units and 2015 MYLTIP Units under the graded vesting attribution method. Under the graded vesting attribution method, each portion of the award that vests at a different date is accounted for as a separate award and recognized over the period appropriate to that portion so that the compensation cost for each portion should be recognized in full by the time that portion vests. Dividends paid on both vested and unvested shares of restricted stock are charged directly to Dividends in Excess of Earnings in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Aggregate stock-based compensation expense associated with restricted stock, non-qualified stock options, LTIP Units, 2012 OPP Units, 2013 MYLTIP Units, 2014 MYLTIP Units and 2015 MYLTIP Units was approximately $5.1 million and $6.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and approximately $15.2 million and $16.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. At June 30, 2015, there was $23.3 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock and LTIP Units and $24.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested 2012 OPP Units, 2013 MYLTIP Units, 2014 MYLTIP Units and 2015 MYLTIP Units that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.7 years.

11. Segment Information

The Company’s segments are based on the Company’s method of internal reporting which classifies its operations by both geographic area and property type. The Company’s segments by geographic area are Boston, New York, San Francisco and Washington, DC. Segments by property type include: Class A Office, Office/Technical, Residential and Hotel.

Asset information by segment is not reported because the Company does not use this measure to assess performance. Therefore, depreciation and amortization expense is not allocated among segments. Interest and other income, development and management services income, general and administrative expenses, transaction costs, interest expense, depreciation and amortization expense, gains (losses) from investments in securities, income from unconsolidated joint ventures, gains on sales of real estate, noncontrolling interests and preferred dividends are not included in Net Operating Income as internal reporting addresses these items on a corporate level.

Net Operating Income is not a measure of operating results or cash flows from operating activities as measured by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and it is not indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. All companies may not calculate Net Operating Income in the same manner. The Company considers Net Operating Income to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because it helps both investors and management to understand the core operations of the Company’s properties. The Company’s management also uses Net Operating Income to evaluate regional property level performance and to make decisions about resource allocations. Further, the Company believes Net Operating Income is useful to investors as a performance measure because, when compared across periods, Net Operating Income reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs and acquisition and development activity on an unleveraged basis, providing perspectives not immediately apparent from net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders.

Information by geographic area and property type (dollars in thousands):

For the three months ended June 30, 2015:


	Boston			New York			San Francisco			Washington, DC			Total
Rental Revenue:
Class A Office	$	174,894		$	246,432		$	68,781		$	91,489		$	581,596
Office/Technical		6,042			—			5,554			2,953			14,549
Residential		1,131			—			—			2,680			3,811
Hotel		13,403			—			—			—			13,403

Total		195,470			246,432			74,335			97,122			613,359

% of Grand Totals		31.87	%		40.18	%		12.12	%		15.83	%		100.00	%
Rental Expenses:
Class A Office		67,874			85,661			23,416			32,180			209,131
Office/Technical		1,779			—			999			1,024			3,802
Residential		511			—			—			1,020			1,531
Hotel		8,495			—			—			—			8,495

Total		78,659			85,661			24,415			34,224			222,959

% of Grand Totals		35.28	%		38.42	%		10.95	%		15.35	%		100.00	%

Net operating income	$	116,811		$	160,771		$	49,920		$	62,898		$	390,400

% of Grand Totals		29.92	%		41.18	%		12.79	%		16.11	%		100.00	%

For the three months ended June 30, 2014:


	Boston			New York			San Francisco			Washington, DC			Total
Rental Revenue:
Class A Office	$	173,128		$	223,899		$	57,450		$	94,222		$	548,699
Office/Technical		5,912			—			6,341			3,671			15,924
Residential		1,089			—			—			5,209			6,298
Hotel		12,367			—			—			—			12,367

Total		192,496			223,899			63,791			103,102			583,288

% of Grand Totals		33.00	%		38.39	%		10.94	%		17.67	%		100.00	%
Rental Expenses:
Class A Office		65,818			74,962			21,282			32,481			194,543
Office/Technical		1,736			—			1,308			1,123			4,167
Residential		544			—			—			3,392			3,936
Hotel		7,315			—			—			—			7,315

Total		75,413			74,962			22,590			36,996			209,961

% of Grand Totals		35.92	%		35.70	%		10.76	%		17.62	%		100.00	%

Net operating income	$	117,083		$	148,937		$	41,201		$	66,106		$	373,327

% of Grand Totals		31.36	%		39.89	%		11.04	%		17.71	%		100.00	%

For the six months ended June 30, 2015:


	Boston			New York			San Francisco			Washington, DC			Total
Rental Revenue:
Class A Office	$	344,801		$	499,530		$	135,033		$	184,620		$	1,163,984
Office/Technical		12,162			—			11,213			5,995			29,370
Residential		2,309			—			—			8,356			10,665
Hotel		22,488			—			—			—			22,488

Total		381,760			499,530			146,246			198,971			1,226,507

% of Grand Totals		31.13	%		40.73	%		11.92	%		16.22	%		100.00	%
Rental Expenses:
Class A Office		142,339			170,722			45,325			64,460			422,846
Office/Technical		3,765			—			1,911			2,215			7,891
Residential		1,020			—			—			4,057			5,077
Hotel		16,071			—			—			—			16,071

Total		163,195			170,722			47,236			70,732			451,885

% of Grand Totals		36.12	%		37.78	%		10.45	%		15.65	%		100.00	%

Net operating income	$	218,565		$	328,808		$	99,010		$	128,239		$	774,622

% of Grand Totals		28.22	%		42.45	%		12.78	%		16.55	%		100.00	%

For the six months ended June 30, 2014:


	Boston			New York			San Francisco			Washington, DC			Total
Rental Revenue:
Class A Office	$	344,070		$	441,207		$	112,058		$	191,270		$	1,088,605
Office/Technical		11,732			—			12,558			7,331			31,621
Residential		2,252			—			—			9,728			11,980
Hotel		20,560			—			—			—			20,560

Total		378,614			441,207			124,616			208,329			1,152,766

% of Grand Totals		32.84	%		38.28	%		10.81	%		18.07	%		100.00	%
Rental Expenses:
Class A Office		137,216			149,333			40,595			65,920			393,064
Office/Technical		3,425			—			2,522			2,325			8,272
Residential		992			—			—			6,706			7,698
Hotel		14,112			—			—			—			14,112

Total		155,745			149,333			43,117			74,951			423,146

% of Grand Totals		36.81	%		35.29	%		10.19	%		17.71	%		100.00	%

Net operating income	$	222,869		$	291,874		$	81,499		$	133,378		$	729,620

% of Grand Totals		30.55	%		40.00	%		11.17	%		18.28	%		100.00	%

The following is a reconciliation of Net Operating Income to net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders:


	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2015			2014		2015		2014
	(in thousands)
Net Operating Income	$	390,400		$	373,327	$	774,622	$	729,620
Add:
Development and management services income		4,862			6,506		10,190		11,722
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures		3,078			2,834		17,912		5,650
Interest and other income		1,293			2,109		2,700		3,420
Gains (losses) from investments in securities		(24	)		662		369		948
Gains on sales of real estate		—			—		95,084		—
Less:
General and administrative expense		22,284			23,271		51,075		53,176
Transaction costs		208			661		535		1,098
Depreciation and amortization expense		167,844			154,628		322,067		308,898
Interest expense		108,534			110,977		217,291		224,531
Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships		9,264			7,553		24,472		11,907
Noncontrolling interest—redeemable preferred units of the Operating Partnership		3			320		6		939
Noncontrolling interest—common units of the Operating Partnership		9,394			8,883		29,530		15,010
Preferred dividends		2,618			2,618		5,207		5,207

Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	79,460		$	76,527	$	250,694	$	130,594

12. Subsequent Events

From July 1, 2015 through August 7, 2015, 767 Fifth Partners LLC, which is the consolidated entity (in which the Company has a 60% interest and owns 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building) in New York City), entered into four forward-starting interest rate swap contracts which fix the 10-year swap rate at a weighted-average rate of 2.813% per annum on notional amounts aggregating $100.0 million. The interest rate swap contracts were entered into in advance of a financing with a target commencement date in June 2017 and maturity in June 2027 (See Note 5). In addition, the Company entered into one forward-starting interest rate swap contract which fixes the 10-year swap rate at a rate of 2.532% per annum on a notional amount of $25.0 million. The interest rate swap contract was entered into in advance of a financing with a target commencement date in September 2016 and maturity in September 2026 (See Note 5).

On July 29, 2015, a consolidated entity in which the Company has a 50% interest executed a binding agreement for the sale of 505 9th Street, N.W. located in Washington, DC, for approximately $318.0 million (which exceeds its carrying value), including the assumption by the buyer of approximately $117.0 million of mortgage indebtedness. 505 9th Street, N.W. is an approximately 322,000 net rentable square foot Class A office building. The sale is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions and there can be no assurance that the sale will be consummated on the terms currently contemplated or at all.

On July 31, 2015, the Company entered into a 99-year ground and air rights lease (the “Lease”) with the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (“MDOT”) with respect to the parking garage located at 100 Clarendon Street (the “Clarendon Garage”) and the concourse level of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s Back Bay Station (the “Station”). The Lease amends and restates the air rights lease which the Company had assumed in 2010 at the time it acquired its interests in both the Clarendon Garage and the office tower located at 200 Clarendon Street (formerly the John Hancock Tower). The previous lease had 45 years remaining in its term. Upon execution of the Lease, the Company made a $5.0 million option payment which provides the Company with options under the Lease to acquire certain air rights above both the Clarendon Garage and the Station; the amount of developable square footage associated with the air rights will be determined at a later date. In consideration for MDOT entering into the new Lease, the Company has agreed to make improvements to the Station in an amount of $32.0 million, which amount will be credited against the Company’s rental obligations under the Lease.

On August 6, 2015, the Company executed an amendment to the joint venture agreement for its Fountain Square property located in Reston, Virginia. The amendment requires the Company to acquire its partner’s nominal 50% interest on September 15, 2015 for approximately $100.9 million in cash (See Note 7).

ITEM 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

As used herein, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer to Boston Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation organized in 1997, individually or together with its subsidiaries, including Boston Properties Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, and our predecessors.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the documents incorporated by reference, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe harbor provisions. Such statements are contained principally, but not only, under the captions “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” We caution investors that any such forward-looking statements are based on beliefs and on assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. When used, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “project,” “result,” “should,” “will” and similar expressions which do not relate solely to historical matters are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance, which may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties and factors that are beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected by the forward-looking statements. We caution you that, while forward-looking statements reflect our good-faith beliefs when we make them, they are not guarantees of future performance and are impacted by actual events when they occur after we make such statements. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on forward-looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.

Some of the risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:

•

If there is a negative change in the economy including but not limited to a reversal of current job growth trends and an increase in unemployment, it could have a negative effect on the following, among other things:

•

the fundamentals of our business, including overall market occupancy, tenant space utilization, and rental rates;

•

the financial condition of our tenants, many of which are financial, legal, media/telecommunication, technology and other professional firms, our lenders, counterparties to our derivative financial instruments and institutions that hold our cash balances and short-term investments, which may expose us to increased risks of default by these parties; and

•

the value of our real estate assets, which may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or obtain or maintain debt financing secured by our properties or on an unsecured basis;

•

general risks affecting the real estate industry (including, without limitation, the inability to enter into or renew leases, tenant space utilization, dependence on tenants’ financial condition, and competition from other developers, owners and operators of real estate);

•

failure to manage effectively our growth and expansion into new markets and sub-markets or to integrate acquisitions and developments successfully;

•

the ability of our joint venture partners to satisfy their obligations;

•

risks and uncertainties affecting property development and construction (including, without limitation, construction delays, increased construction costs, cost overruns, inability to obtain necessary permits, tenant accounting considerations that may result in negotiated lease provisions that limit a tenant’s liability during construction, and public opposition to such activities);

•

risks associated with the availability and terms of financing and the use of debt to fund acquisitions and developments or refinance existing indebtedness, including the impact of higher interest rates on the cost and/or availability of financing;

•

risks associated with forward interest rate contracts and the effectiveness of such arrangements;

•

risks associated with downturns in the national and local economies, increases in interest rates, and volatility in the securities markets;

•

risks associated with actual or threatened terrorist attacks;

•

costs of compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other similar laws;

•

potential liability for uninsured losses and environmental contamination;

•

risks associated with security breaches through cyber attacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions of our information technology (IT) networks and related systems, which support our operations and our buildings;

•

risks associated with our potential failure to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;

•

possible adverse changes in tax and environmental laws;

•

the impact of newly adopted accounting principles on our accounting policies and on period-to-period comparisons of financial results;

•

risks associated with possible state and local tax audits;

•

risks associated with our dependence on key personnel whose continued service is not guaranteed; and

•

the other risk factors identified in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, including those described under the caption “Risk Factors.”

The risks set forth above are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. Investors should also refer to our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for future periods and Current Reports on Form 8-K as we file them with the SEC, and to other materials we may furnish to the public from time to time through Forms 8-K or otherwise, for a discussion of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information, future events, or otherwise, and you should not rely upon these forward-looking statements after the date of this report.

Overview

We are a fully integrated self-administered and self-managed REIT and one of the largest owners and developers of Class A office properties in the United States. Our properties are concentrated in four markets-Boston, New York, San Francisco and Washington, DC. We generate revenue and cash primarily by leasing Class A office space to our tenants. Factors we consider when we lease space include the creditworthiness of the tenant, the length of the lease, the rental rate to be paid at inception and throughout the lease term, the costs of tenant improvements and other landlord concessions, current and anticipated operating costs and real estate taxes, our current and anticipated vacancy, current and anticipated future demand for office space and general economic factors. From time to time, we also generate cash through the sale of assets.

Our core strategy has always been to own, operate and develop properties in supply-constrained markets with high barriers-to-entry and to focus on executing long-term leases with financially strong tenants. Historically, this combination has tended to reduce our exposure in down cycles and enhance revenues as market conditions improve. To be successful in any leasing environment, we believe all aspects of the tenant-landlord relationship must be considered. In this regard, we believe that our understanding of tenants’ short- and long-term space utilization and amenity needs in the local markets in which we operate, our relationships with local brokers, our reputation as a premier developer, owner and operator of Class A office properties, our financial strength and our ability to maintain high building standards provide us with a competitive advantage.

Our overall leasing activity in the second quarter was in line with our ten-year average of leasing approximately 1.0 million square feet per quarter, and our occupancy improved from 90.3% at the end of the first quarter to 91.1% at June 30, 2015. We expect our occupancy to be relatively stable for the remainder of 2015. In addition, we saw roll-up in rents on second generation leases in Boston, San Francisco, New York City and Reston, Virginia.

New York continues to be a healthy market with solid leasing activity. However, we have limited current vacancy and limited rollover exposure through the end of 2015. Most of our current negotiations relate to future availability with the exception of 250 West 55th Street, where we completed eight new leases in the second quarter to bring the building to 89% leased. At 601 Lexington Avenue, we have approximately 140,000 square feet expiring in 2016 and are contemplating a repositioning of the retail and the low rise office space at that property. This vacancy and repositioning will result in a diminution of 2016 occupancy and revenue, but we believe it will significantly enhance the value of the asset over the long term. At 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building), we accelerated the lease expiration of a retail tenant that occupied approximately 60,000 square feet in order to allow an existing tenant to use the space on a temporary basis as it reconfigures its existing operations. This will reduce the revenue from this space in 2015 and 2016, but we believe it will position this building for even stronger performance over the long term.

In our Washington, DC region, the overall leasing activity continues to be slow, though we were able to complete approximately 191,000 square feet of leasing in the second quarter. For the first time in a number of quarters, there was positive absorption in the Washington, DC Central Business District (“CBD”). However, the Washington, DC CBD continues to be very competitive because there has not been any significant increase in demand and there is uncertainty with regard to the large amount of GSA-related expirations between 2015 and 2017. Public sector and defense contractor demand continues to be adversely impacted by continued federal budgetary uncertainty, corresponding risk of reductions in discretionary spending programs and mandated GSA occupancy densification. We have one near-term expiration at our 1330 Connecticut Avenue building for which we are actively involved in lease extension negotiations. Our development at 601 Massachusetts Avenue is scheduled to be delivered in September 2015 and is 83% leased. Our joint venture assets, including Market Square North, 901 New York Avenue and Metropolitan Square, face approximately 200,000 square feet of lease expirations in late 2015. Reston Town Center continues to be the best performing submarket in our Washington, DC region with vacancy of approximately 3% and rents significantly greater than other submarkets in Northern Virginia. We continue to see expansion with our existing tenants and strong tenant demand due to the combination of walkable retail, high-quality new multifamily, community programming and improving access to the Metro.

In the Boston region, the expansion of the life sciences and technology industry continues to positively impact each of the submarkets in which we operate. The lack of available supply in Cambridge is a challenge given the continued organic growth of the companies looking to grow within their existing market. While there are companies migrating to the Back Bay, Financial District, Seaport and suburban markets, Kendall Center (formerly Cambridge Center) continues to dramatically outperform the rest of the Boston submarkets. Our Cambridge portfolio is essentially 100% leased and we have no short-term availability or near-term expirations. However, there are a number of large expansion requirements in the market, including some from our own tenants. We are working on increasing our developable square footage at Kendall Center (formerly Cambridge Center) which we are hopeful will provide us the ability to develop an additional 600,000 square feet of office

and 400,000 square feet of residential space. In the Back Bay, our repositioning and rebranding at 120 St. James Street, where we have approximately 170,000 square feet of availability, is underway and activity is positive. We also have approximately 150,000 square feet expiring at the top of 200 Clarendon Street (formerly the John Hancock Tower) which will not be in market ready condition until the end of 2015, with rent commencement likely not occurring on both of these spaces until the end of 2016 or 2017. Based on current market rates, when fully leased, we expect the incremental contribution from the available space at 120 St. James Street and 200 Clarendon Street (formerly the John Hancock Tower) to be approximately $25 million. Our development at 888 Boylston Street continues on schedule and we have signed another full floor lease bringing the total office space leased to 71%. We also have significant interest in the 65,000 square feet of retail space and are negotiating our first major lease. At 100 Federal Street, a property in which we have a 55% interest, we are in active discussions with two existing tenants to restack their existing space in order to accommodate a major lease with a new tenant. These transactions involve more than 1.0 million square feet and would bring the building to 100% leased. However, we do not expect revenue recognition to occur in the currently available space until late 2016 or 2017. We believe these transactions will enhance the value of the assets even though they will have a negative impact on our short-term financial performance. Our Waltham submarket also continues to get stronger, driven by the expansion of life science and technology tenants, much of this from organic growth. We are currently in negotiations for all of the remaining space at our 10 CityPoint project that will deliver in mid 2016 at rents that are 25% higher than they were 18 months ago.

Leasing activity in the San Francisco CBD and Silicon Valley submarkets remains healthy and, given the regulations surrounding zoning in San Francisco, will likely continue to face available supply limitations. Other than new developments, there are extremely limited large blocks of space available in the city. At Embarcadero Center, where we are currently approximately 95% leased, we completed approximately 112,000 square feet of office leasing during the quarter. The largest deal was for approximately 75,000 square feet with substantial markup in the rental rate which will have a positive impact throughout the remainder of 2015. We are also actively engaged with additional full floor tenants with 2016 and 2017 expirations. In total, we have over 1.0 million square feet of lease expirations at Embarcadero Center, through the end of 2017, where we believe the current market rents are well in excess of the expiring rents. In Mountain View, the lack of available supply has led to an increase in market rents, and at 3100-3130 Zanker Road we have a number of active full building prospects as well as the potential to expand the project by up to 500,000 square feet. At Gateway, we expect our largest tenant to vacate between 185,000 and 285,000 square feet in early 2016. We believe the upgrade to the Caltrain station and its proximity to our Gateway properties will enhance our leasing prospects. At 535 Mission Street, we have completed additional leasing bringing us to 81% leased and we continue to have strong activity. Lastly, there is a continuous flow of users that have expressed interest at Salesforce Tower, our approximately 1.4 million square foot Class A office tower currently under construction with an estimated initial occupancy in the second quarter of 2017.

The table below details the leasing activity during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2015			Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
	Square Feet

Vacant space available at the beginning of the period		4,011,639			3,442,468
Property dispositions/properties taken out of service		(73,258	)		(73,258	)
Properties placed in-service		25,945			58,220
Leases expiring or terminated during the period		1,256,792			3,218,234

Total space available for lease		5,221,118			6,645,664

1^st generation leases		159,367			294,521
2^nd generation leases with new tenants		1,043,237			1,479,642
2^nd generation lease renewals		343,902			1,196,889

Total space leased		1,546,506			2,971,052

Vacant space available for lease at the end of the period		3,674,612			3,674,612

Second generation leasing information:(1)
Leases commencing during the period, in square feet		1,387,139			2,676,531
Average Lease Term		87 Months			96 Months
Average Free Rent Period		40 Days			41 Days
Total Transaction Costs Per Square Foot(2)	$	39.18		$	40.90
Increase in Gross Rents(3)		14.56	%		5.21	%
Increase in Net Rents(4)		22.30	%		7.21	%

(1)

Second generation leases are defined as leases for space that had previously been leased. Of the 1,387,139 and 2,676,531 square feet of second generation leases that commenced during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, leases for 1,223,146 and 2,085,576 square feet were signed in prior periods for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

(2)	Total transaction costs include tenant improvements and leasing commissions and exclude free rent concessions and other inducements in accordance with GAAP.

(3)

Represents the increase in gross rent (base rent plus expense reimbursements) on the new vs. expired leases on the 896,470 and 2,015,641 square feet of second generation leases (1) that had been occupied within the prior 12 months and (2) for which the new lease term is greater than six months for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

(4)

Represents the increase in net rent (gross rent less operating expenses) on the new vs. expired leases on the 896,470 and 2,015,641 square feet of second generation leases (1) that had been occupied within the prior 12 months and (2) for which the new lease term is greater than six months for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

Investor enthusiasm for real estate assets remains robust as positive rent growth, a significant yield gap and the potential for an appreciating U.S. dollar attracts both domestic and foreign investors to high-quality office assets in our core markets. We continue to actively underwrite acquisitions, but acquiring high-quality assets at acceptable returns is challenging in the current environment. We intend to remain disciplined in our underwriting and may seek to acquire existing buildings in ventures with private capital sources and enhance our returns through fees earned for providing our real estate management expertise.

The same factors that create challenges to acquiring assets present opportunities for us to continue to review our portfolio to identify properties that may have limited opportunities for cash flow growth, no longer fit within our portfolio strategy or can attract premium pricing in the current market environment as potential sales candidates. We expect to continue to recycle capital from the sales of our properties into new development or redevelopment projects with higher returns. For example, in July 2015, we announced that we had executed an agreement to sell 505 9th Street, an approximately 322,000 square foot Class A office building in Washington,

DC in which we have a 50% interest, for approximately $318 million. We are also considering additional asset sales, targeting total sales volume for 2015 of approximately $750 million. Due to the uncertainties inherent in marketing assets for sale, there can be no assurance as to the amount or timing of future asset sales activity. In general, we structure asset sales for possible inclusion in like-kind exchanges within the meaning of Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. The ability to complete a like-kind exchange depends on many factors, including, among others, identifying and acquiring suitable replacement property within limited time periods and the ownership structure of the properties being sold and acquired, and therefore we are not always able to sell an asset as part of a like-kind exchange. When successful, a like-kind exchange enables us to defer the taxable gain on the asset sold and thus limit our REIT distribution requirement and preserve capital. If we are unable to identify and acquire suitable replacement property in a like-kind exchange, then we expect to distribute at least the amount of proceeds necessary to avoid paying a corporate level tax on the gain realized from the sale (See “Liquidity and Capital Resources—REIT Tax Distribution Considerations—Application of Recent Regulations”).

During the second quarter, we commenced three new development projects. The most significant is Dock72, in which we have a 50% interest, an approximately 670,000 square foot, 16-story building located in the Brooklyn Navy Yard. We have pre-leased approximately 33% of the building to a tenant for 20 years and we expect to deliver the building in the first half of 2018. We believe this investment could lead to additional development opportunities in Brooklyn, a new sub-market which presents opportunities for us to expand our presence in New York and build long-term relationships with growth companies. In addition, we recently formed a joint venture to develop 1265 Main Street in Waltham, Massachusetts, another project in which we have a 50% interest. 1265 Main Street will be a three-story, approximately 115,000 square foot building that is 100% pre-leased. Importantly, this investment in Waltham provides us an opportunity to develop up to an additional 1.0 million square feet of commercial space on a site adjacent to our CityPoint portfolio. The last of the three projects is a redevelopment of Reservoir Place North, our approximately 73,000 square foot building in Waltham, Massachusetts. Although the incremental cost to us is only approximately $25 million, we again expect to generate returns that exceed the returns we could expect by acquiring an existing office building.

With these new projects, as of June 30, 2015, our current development pipeline consists of 14 projects totaling approximately 4.2 million square feet. Our share of the total projected investment is approximately $2.4 billion, of which approximately $1.3 billion remains to be funded. Additionally, we are working on several new developments in each of our markets, including land parcels, options on sites or existing asset redevelopment opportunities, some of which could commence later in 2015. These include the first phase of North Station consisting of 360,000 square feet of retail and loft office space in Boston, a 160,000 square foot residential development located in Kendall Center (formerly Cambridge Center) in Cambridge, a 600,000 square foot residential and retail development located in Reston Town Center, three different potential office build-to-suit opportunities in our Washington, DC region representing over 1.3 million square feet and significant improvement projects at 601 Lexington Avenue in New York City and 100 Federal Street in Boston, which will enhance and add high-value retail amenities to the buildings. The actual amount and timing of new development activities will depend on the completion of the entitlement and planning processes and in many cases some level of pre-leasing.

Consistent with our core strategy and philosophy, we make decisions with a long-term view to maximizing the value of individual assets and the portfolio. As discussed above, we have made decisions to reposition certain assets and facilitate lease transitions and building “restackings” to accommodate tenants, which will negatively impact our Same Property Portfolio Net Operating Income in 2016. We expect the downtime associated with a tenant vacating approximately 140,000 square feet at 601 Lexington Avenue, the rent differential and downtime from the retail tenant vacating 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building) for a temporary user during part of 2016 and the lease transition at 100 Federal Street in Boston, combined with the loss of approximately 200,000 square feet of occupancy in our Washington, DC joint venture properties and the leases expiring at our Gateway properties in South San Francisco, to reduce our 2016 net operating income by approximately $35 million. This reflects specific tenant activity at a small subset of our properties that will impact our 2016 Same Property Portfolio Net Operating Income performance but is not an indication of the projected performance of

the portfolio as a whole. We believe certain events may offset this reduction, including growth from the completion of the lease up of 250 West 55th Street in New York City and 535 Mission Street in San Francisco, as well as the delivery of approximately $850 million of new developments through the end of 2016. We do not, however, expect to realize the full impact of these deliveries in 2016 because several of the projects will not deliver until late in 2016 and they will be in lease up. We project this pipeline of near-term deliveries to stabilize by the end of 2017, and based on projected market rental rates, estimate that they will generate approximately $70 million of net operating income at stabilization. In addition, we expect our organic growth to accelerate in late 2016 and into 2017 with the lease up of our vacant space at 200 Clarendon Street (formerly the John Hancock Tower) and 100 Federal Street in Boston, the releasing of the retail space at 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building) and the roll up on expiring leases at Embarcadero Center.

Transactions during the three months ended June 30, 2015 included the following:

•

During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we entered into three forward-starting interest rate swap contracts, which fix the 10-year swap rate on notional amounts aggregating $75.0 million. We have now entered into a total of nine forward-starting interest rate swap contracts, including one contract entered into subsequent to June 30, 2015, which fix the 10-year swap rate at a weighted-average rate of approximately 2.463% per annum on notional amounts aggregating $350.0 million. The interest rate swap contracts were entered into in advance of a financing with a target commencement date in September 2016 and maturity in September 2026.

In addition, 767 Fifth Partners LLC, which is the consolidated entity (in which we have a 60% interest and owns 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building) in New York City), entered into nine forward-starting interest rate swap contracts, including four contracts entered into subsequent to June 30, 2015, which fix the 10-year swap rate at a weighted-average rate of approximately 2.801% per annum on notional amounts aggregating $250.0 million. These interest rate swap contracts were entered into in advance of a financing with a target commencement date in June 2017 and maturity in June 2027.

•

On May 1, 2015, we commenced the redevelopment of Reservoir Place North, a Class A office project with approximately 73,000 net rentable square feet located in Waltham, Massachusetts.

•

On May 8, 2015, we entered into a joint venture with an unrelated third party to redevelop an existing building into a Class A office building totaling approximately 115,000 net rentable square feet at 1265 Main Street in Waltham, Massachusetts. The joint venture partner contributed real estate and improvements, with an aggregate fair value of approximately $9.4 million, for its initial 50% interest in the joint venture. For our initial 50% interest, we will contribute cash totaling approximately $9.4 million as the joint venture incurs costs. The joint venture has entered into a fifteen-year lease with a tenant to occupy 100% of the building.

•

On June 25, 2015, our Operating Partnership redeemed the remaining 12,667 Series Four Preferred Units for cash totaling approximately $0.6 million.

•

On June 26, 2015, we entered into a joint venture with an unrelated third party to develop Dock72, an office building totaling approximately 670,000 net rentable square feet located at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in Brooklyn, New York. Each partner contributed cash totaling approximately $9.1 million for their initial 50% interest in the joint venture. The joint venture entered into a 96-year ground lease, comprised of an initial term of 49 years, which may be extended by the joint venture to 2111, subject to certain conditions. The joint venture also entered into a 20-year lease with a tenant to occupy approximately 222,000 net rentable square feet at the building. In addition, the joint venture entered into an option agreement pursuant to which it may lease an additional land parcel at the site, which could support between 600,000 and 1,000,000 net rentable square feet of development. In connection with the execution of the option agreement, the joint venture paid a non-refundable option payment of $1.0 million.

Transactions completed subsequent to June 30, 2015 included the following:

•

On July 29, 2015, a consolidated entity in which we have a 50% interest executed a binding agreement for the sale of 505 9th Street, N.W. located in Washington, DC, for approximately $318.0 million (which exceeds its carrying value), including the assumption by the buyer of approximately $117.0 million of mortgage indebtedness. 505 9th Street, N.W. is an approximately 322,000 net rentable square foot Class A office building. The sale is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions and, although there can be no assurance that the sale will be consummated on the terms currently contemplated or at all, it is expected to close by the end of the third quarter of 2015.

•

On July 31, 2015, we entered into a 99-year ground and air rights lease (the “Lease”) with the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (“MDOT”) with respect to the parking garage located at 100 Clarendon Street (the “Clarendon Garage”) and the concourse level of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s Back Bay Station (the “Station”). The Lease amends and restates the air rights lease which we had assumed in 2010 at the time we acquired an interest in both the Clarendon Garage and the office tower located at 200 Clarendon Street (formerly the John Hancock Tower). The previous lease had 45 years remaining in its term. Upon execution of the Lease, we made a $5.0 million option payment which provides us with options under the Lease to acquire certain air rights above both the Clarendon Garage and the Station; the amount of developable square footage associated with the air rights will be determined at a later date. In consideration for MDOT entering into the new Lease, we have agreed to make improvements to the Station in an amount of $32.0 million, which amount will be credited against our rental obligations under the Lease.

•

On August 6, 2015, we executed an amendment to the joint venture agreement for our Fountain Square property located in Reston, Virginia. The amendment requires us to acquire our partner’s nominal 50% interest on September 15, 2015 for approximately $100.9 million in cash (See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. From time to time, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. Below is a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Real Estate

Upon acquisitions of real estate that constitutes a business, which includes the consolidation of previously unconsolidated joint ventures, we assess the fair value of acquired tangible and intangible assets, (including land, buildings, tenant improvements, “above-” and “below-market” leases, leasing and assumed financing origination costs, acquired in-place leases, other identified intangible assets and assumed liabilities) and allocate the purchase price to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including land and buildings as if vacant. We assess and consider fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize discount and/or capitalization rates that we deem appropriate, as well as available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known and anticipated trends, and market and economic conditions.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant. We also consider an allocation of purchase price of other acquired intangibles, including acquired in-place leases that may have a customer relationship intangible value, including (but not limited to) the nature and extent of the existing relationship with the tenants, the tenants’ credit quality and expectations of lease renewals. Based on our acquisitions to date, our allocation to customer relationship intangible assets has been immaterial.

We record acquired “above-” and “below-market” leases at their fair values (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) equal to the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (2) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. Acquired “above-” and “below-market” lease values have been reflected within Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values that are based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. Factors to be considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, we include real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, we consider leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.

Management reviews its long-lived assets for impairment every quarter and when there is an event or change in circumstances that indicates an impairment in value. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of its assets is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. If such criteria are present, an impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value. The evaluation of anticipated cash flows is highly subjective and is based in part on assumptions regarding anticipated hold periods, future occupancy, rental rates and capital requirements that could differ materially from actual results in future periods. Since cash flows on properties considered to be “long-lived assets to be held and used” are considered on an undiscounted basis to determine whether an asset has been impaired, our established strategy of holding properties over the long term directly decreases the likelihood of recording an impairment loss. If our hold strategy changes or market conditions otherwise dictate an earlier sale date, an impairment loss may be recognized and such loss could be material. If we determine that an impairment has occurred, the affected assets must be reduced to their fair value, less cost to sell.

Guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360 “Property Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”) requires that qualifying assets and liabilities and the results of operations that have been sold, or otherwise qualify as “held for sale,” be presented as discontinued operations in all periods presented if the property operations are expected to be eliminated and we will not have significant continuing involvement following the sale. The components of the property’s net income that is reflected as discontinued operations include the net gain (or loss) upon the disposition of the property held for sale, operating results, depreciation and interest expense (if the property is subject to a secured loan). We generally consider assets to be “held for sale” when the transaction has been approved by our Board of Directors, or a committee thereof, and there are no known significant contingencies relating to the sale, such that a sale of the property within one year is considered probable. Following the classification of a property as “held for sale,” no further depreciation is recorded on the assets, and the asset is written down to the lower of carrying value or fair market value, less cost to sell. On April 10, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity” (“ASU 2014-08”). ASU 2014-08 clarifies that discontinued operations presentation applies only to disposals representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results (e.g., a disposal of a major geographical area, a major line of business, a major equity method investment or other major parts of an entity). ASU 2014-08 is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted, and we early adopted ASU 2014-08 during the first quarter of 2014. Our adoption of ASU 2014-08 resulted in the operating results and gain on sale of real

estate from the operating property sold during the six months ended June 30, 2015 not being reflected as Discontinued Operations in our Consolidated Statements of Operations (See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Real estate is stated at depreciated cost. A variety of costs are incurred in the acquisition, development and leasing of properties. The cost of buildings and improvements includes the purchase price of property, legal fees and other acquisition costs. We expense costs that we incur to effect a business combination such as legal, due diligence and other closing related costs. Costs directly related to the development of properties are capitalized. Capitalized development costs include interest, internal wages, property taxes, insurance, and other project costs incurred during the period of development. After the determination is made to capitalize a cost, it is allocated to the specific component of a project that is benefited. Determination of when a development project commences and capitalization begins, and when a development project is substantially complete and held available for occupancy and capitalization must cease, involves a degree of judgment. Our capitalization policy on development properties is guided by guidance in ASC 835-20 “Capitalization of Interest” and ASC 970 “Real Estate-General.” The costs of land and buildings under development include specifically identifiable costs.

The capitalized costs include pre-construction costs necessary to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, salaries and related costs and other costs incurred during the period of development. We begin the capitalization of costs during the pre-construction period which we define as activities that are necessary to the development of the property. We consider a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy upon the completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from cessation of major construction activity. We cease capitalization on the portion (1) substantially completed, (2) occupied or held available for occupancy, and we capitalize only those costs associated with the portion under construction or (3) if activities necessary for the development of the property have been suspended.

Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

We consolidate variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which we are considered to be the primary beneficiary. VIEs are entities in which the equity investors do not have sufficient equity at risk to finance their endeavors without additional financial support or that the holders of the equity investment at risk do not have a controlling financial interest. The primary beneficiary is defined by the entity having both of the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities that, when taken together, most significantly impact the variable interest entity’s performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and right to receive the returns from the variable interest entity that would be significant to the variable interest entity. For ventures that are not VIEs we consolidate entities for which we have significant decision making control over the ventures’ operations. Our judgment with respect to our level of influence or control of an entity involves the consideration of various factors including the form of our ownership interest, our representation in the entity’s governance, the size of our investment (including loans), estimates of future cash flows, our ability to participate in policy making decisions and the rights of the other investors to participate in the decision making process and to replace us as manager and/or liquidate the venture, if applicable. Our assessment of our influence or control over an entity affects the presentation of these investments in our consolidated financial statements. In addition to evaluating control rights, we consolidate entities in which the outside partner has no substantive kick-out rights to remove us as the managing member.

Accounts of the consolidated entity are included in our accounts and the non-controlling interest is reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of equity or in temporary equity between liabilities and equity. Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are recorded initially at cost, and subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings and cash contributions and distributions. Any difference between the carrying amount of these investments on the balance sheet and the underlying equity in net assets is amortized as an adjustment to equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures over the life of the related asset. Under the equity method of accounting, our net equity investment is reflected within the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and our share of net

income or loss from the joint ventures is included within the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The joint venture agreements may designate different percentage allocations among investors for profits and losses; however, our recognition of joint venture income or loss generally follows the joint venture’s distribution priorities, which may change upon the achievement of certain investment return thresholds. We may account for cash distributions in excess of our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture as income when we are not the general partner in a limited partnership and when we have neither the requirement nor the intent to provide financial support to the joint venture. Our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are reviewed for impairment periodically and we record impairment charges when events or circumstances change indicating that a decline in the fair values below the carrying values has occurred and such decline is other-than-temporary. The ultimate realization of the investment in unconsolidated joint ventures is dependent on a number of factors, including the performance of each investment and market conditions. We will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the value below the carrying value of an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture is other-than-temporary.

To the extent that we contribute assets to a joint venture, our investment in the joint venture is recorded at our cost basis in the assets that were contributed to the joint venture. To the extent that our cost basis is different than the basis reflected at the joint venture level, the basis difference is amortized over the life of the related asset and included in our share of equity in net income of the joint venture. In accordance with the provisions of ASC 970-323 “Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures” (“ASC 970-323”), we will recognize gains on the contribution of real estate to joint ventures, relating solely to the outside partner’s interest, to the extent the economic substance of the transaction is a sale.

The combined summarized financial information of the unconsolidated joint ventures is disclosed in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition

In general, we commence rental revenue recognition when the tenant takes possession of the leased space and the leased space is substantially ready for its intended use. Contractual rental revenue is reported on a straight-line basis over the terms of our respective leases. We recognize rental revenue of acquired in-place “above-” and “below-market” leases at their fair values over the original term of the respective leases. Accrued rental income as reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets represents rental income recognized in excess of rent payments actually received pursuant to the terms of the individual lease agreements.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the impact of the net adjustments of rents from “above-” and “below-market” leases increased rental revenue by approximately $13.6 million and $23.6 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the impact of the straight-line rent adjustment increased rental revenue by approximately $17.8 million and $43.7 million, respectively. Those amounts exclude the adjustment of rents from “above-” and “below-market” leases and straight-line income from unconsolidated joint ventures, which are disclosed in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our leasing strategy is generally to secure creditworthy tenants that meet our underwriting guidelines. Furthermore, following the initiation of a lease, we continue to actively monitor the tenant’s creditworthiness to ensure that all tenant related assets are recorded at their realizable value. When assessing tenant credit quality, we:

•

review relevant financial information, including:

•

financial ratios;

•

net worth;

•

revenue;

•

cash flows;

•

leverage; and

•

liquidity;

•

evaluate the depth and experience of the tenant’s management team; and

•

assess the strength/growth of the tenant’s industry.

As a result of the underwriting process, tenants are then categorized into one of three categories:

(1)

acceptable-risk tenants;

(2)

the tenant’s credit is such that we may require collateral, in which case we:

•

may require a security deposit; and/or

•

may reduce upfront tenant improvement investments; or

(3)

the tenant’s credit is below our acceptable parameters.

We consistently monitor the credit quality of our tenant base. We provide an allowance for doubtful accounts arising from estimated losses that could result from the tenant’s inability to make required current rent payments and an allowance against accrued rental income for future potential losses that we deem to be unrecoverable over the term of the lease.

Tenant receivables are assigned a credit rating of 1 through 4. A rating of 1 represents the highest possible rating and no allowance is recorded. A rating of 4 represents the lowest credit rating, in which case we record a full reserve against the receivable balance. Among the factors considered in determining the credit rating include:

•

payment history;

•

credit status and change in status (credit ratings for public companies are used as a primary metric);

•

change in tenant space needs (i.e., expansion/downsize);

•

tenant financial performance;

•

economic conditions in a specific geographic region; and

•

industry specific credit considerations.

If our estimates of collectability differ from the cash received, the timing and amount of our reported revenue could be impacted. The average remaining term of our in-place tenant leases, including unconsolidated joint ventures, was approximately 6.7 years as of June 30, 2015. The credit risk is mitigated by the high quality of our existing tenant base, reviews of prospective tenants’ risk profiles prior to lease execution and consistent monitoring of our portfolio to identify potential problem tenants.

Recoveries from tenants, consisting of amounts due from tenants for common area maintenance, real estate taxes and other recoverable costs, are recognized as revenue in the period during which the expenses are incurred. Tenant reimbursements are recognized and presented in accordance with guidance in ASC 605-45 “Principal Agent Considerations” (“ASC 605-45”). ASC 605-45 requires that these reimbursements be recorded on a gross basis, as we are generally the primary obligor with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, have discretion in selecting the supplier and have credit risk. We also receive reimbursement of payroll and payroll related costs from third parties which we reflect on a net basis.

Our parking revenues are derived from leases, monthly parking and transient parking. We recognize parking revenue as earned.

Our hotel revenues are derived from room rentals and other sources such as charges to guests for telephone service, movie and vending commissions, meeting and banquet room revenue and laundry services. Hotel revenues are recognized as earned.

We receive management and development fees from third parties. Property management fees are recorded and earned based on a percentage of collected rents at the properties under management, and not on a straight-line basis, because such fees are contingent upon the collection of rents. We review each development agreement and record development fees as earned depending on the risk associated with each project. Profit on development fees earned from joint venture projects are recognized as revenue to the extent of the third-party partners’ ownership interest.

Gains on sales of real estate are recognized pursuant to the provisions included in ASC 360-20 “Real Estate Sales” (“ASC 360-20”). The specific timing of the sale is measured against various criteria in ASC 360-20 related to the terms of the transaction and any continuing involvement in the form of management or financial assistance associated with the properties. If the sales criteria for the full accrual method are not met, we defer some or all of the gain recognition and account for the continued operations of the property by applying the finance, leasing, profit sharing, deposit, installment or cost recovery methods, as appropriate, until the sales criteria are met.

Depreciation and Amortization

We compute depreciation and amortization on our properties using the straight-line method based on estimated useful asset lives. We allocate the acquisition cost of real estate to its components and depreciate or amortize these assets over their useful lives. The amortization of acquired “above-” and “below-market” leases and acquired in-place leases is recorded as an adjustment to revenue and depreciation and amortization, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, escrows, receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other assets and liabilities are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of the short maturities of these instruments.

We follow the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements when valuing our financial instruments for disclosure purposes. We determine the fair value of our unsecured senior notes and unsecured exchangeable senior notes using market prices. The inputs used in determining the fair value of our unsecured senior notes and unsecured exchangeable senior notes is categorized at a level 1 basis (as defined in the accounting standards for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures) due to the fact that we use quoted market rates to value these instruments. However, the inputs used in determining the fair value could be categorized at a level 2 basis if trading volumes are low. We determine the fair value of our mortgage notes payable using discounted cash flow analyses by discounting the spread between the future contractual interest payments and hypothetical future interest payments on mortgage debt based on current market rates for similar securities. In determining the current market rates, we add our estimates of market spreads to the quoted yields on federal government treasury securities with similar maturity dates to our debt. The inputs used in determining the fair value of our mortgage notes payable and mezzanine notes payable are categorized at a level 3 basis (as defined in the accounting standards for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures) due to the fact that we consider the rates used in the valuation techniques to be unobservable inputs.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivative instruments and hedging activities require management to make judgments on the nature of its derivatives and their effectiveness as hedges. These judgments determine if the changes in fair value of the derivative instruments are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of net income or as a component of comprehensive income (loss) and as a component of equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. While management believes its judgments are reasonable, a change in a derivative’s effectiveness as a hedge could materially affect expenses, net income and equity. We account for the effective portion of changes in the fair value of a derivative in other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassify the effective portion to earnings over the term that the hedged transaction affects earnings. We account for the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of a derivative directly in earnings.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On April 10, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity” (“ASU 2014-08”). ASU No. 2014-08 clarifies that discontinued operations presentation applies only to disposals representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results (e.g., a disposal of a major geographical area, a major line of business, a major equity method investment or other major parts of an entity). ASU 2014-08 is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted, and we early adopted ASU 2014-08 during the first quarter of 2014. Our adoption of ASU 2014-08 resulted in the operating results and gain on sale of real estate from the operating property sold during the six months ended June 30, 2015 not being reflected as Discontinued Operations in our Consolidated Statements of Operations (See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASU 2015-02”). ASU 2015-02 affects reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. ASU 2015-02 modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership and affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. A reporting entity may apply the amendments in ASU 2015-02 using: (a) a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption; or (b) by applying the amendments retrospectively. We are currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of ASU 2015-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”(“ASU 2015-03”), which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs is not affected. ASU 2015-03 is effective for financial statements issued fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years and shall be applied on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-03 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

The following discussion is based on our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

At June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, we owned or had interests in a portfolio of 170 and 180 properties, respectively (in each case, the “Total Property Portfolio”). As a result of changes within our Total Property Portfolio, the financial data presented below shows significant changes in revenue and expenses from period-to-period. Accordingly, we do not believe that our period-to-period financial data with respect to the Total Property Portfolio is necessarily meaningful. Therefore, the comparison of operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 show separately the changes attributable to the properties that were owned by us and in-service throughout each period compared (the “Same Property Portfolio”) and the changes attributable to the properties included in the Placed In-Service, Acquired, Development or Redevelopment or Sold Portfolios.

In our analysis of operating results, particularly to make comparisons of net operating income between periods meaningful, it is important to provide information for properties that were in-service and owned by us

throughout each period presented. We refer to properties acquired or placed in-service prior to the beginning of the earliest period presented and owned by us and in-service through the end of the latest period presented as our Same Property Portfolio. The Same Property Portfolio therefore excludes properties placed in-service, acquired or in development or redevelopment after the beginning of the earliest period presented or disposed of prior to the end of the latest period presented.

Net operating income, or “NOI,” is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, plus income attributable to noncontrolling interests, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, transaction costs, general and administrative expense, less gains on sales of real estate, gains (losses) from investments in securities, income from unconsolidated joint ventures, interest and other income and development and management services revenue. We use NOI internally as a performance measure and believe NOI provides useful information to investors regarding our financial condition and results of operations because it reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level. Therefore, we believe NOI is a useful measure for evaluating the operating performance of our real estate assets.

Our management also uses NOI to evaluate regional property level performance and to make decisions about resource allocations. Further, we believe NOI is useful to investors as a performance measure because, when compared across periods, NOI reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs and acquisition and development activity on an unleveraged basis, providing perspectives not immediately apparent from net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders. NOI excludes certain components from net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders in order to provide results that are more closely related to a property’s results of operations. For example, interest expense is not necessarily linked to the operating performance of a real estate asset and is often incurred at the corporate level as opposed to the property level. In addition, depreciation and amortization, because of historical cost accounting and useful life estimates, may distort operating performance at the property level. NOI presented by us may not be comparable to NOI reported by other REITs that define NOI differently. We believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our operating results, NOI should be examined in conjunction with net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements. NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. For a reconciliation of NOI to net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. commons shareholders, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2015 to the six months ended June 30, 2014.

The table below shows selected operating information for the Same Property Portfolio and the Total Property Portfolio. The Same Property Portfolio consists of 146 properties totaling approximately 38.0 million net rentable square feet of space, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures. The Same Property Portfolio includes properties acquired or placed in-service on or prior to January 1, 2014 and owned and in service through June 30, 2015. The Total Property Portfolio includes the effects of the other properties either placed in-service, acquired or in development or redevelopment after January 1, 2014 or disposed of on or prior to June 30, 2015. This table includes a reconciliation from the Same Property Portfolio to the Total Property Portfolio by also providing information for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 with respect to the properties that were placed in-service, in development or redevelopment or sold. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 we had no properties that were acquired.


	Same Property Portfolio										Properties Placed In-Service Portfolio					Properties in Development or Redevelopment Portfolio					Properties Sold Portfolio				Total Property Portfolio
(dollars in thousands)	2015		2014		Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change			2015		2014			2015			2014		2015		2014		2015			2014			Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change
Rental Revenue:
Rental Revenue	$	1,124,487	$	1,091,573	$	32,914			3.02	%	$	46,604	$	8,586		$	661		$	1,077	$	—	$	16,894	$	1,171,752		$	1,118,130		$	53,622			4.80	%
Termination Income		21,604		2,096		19,508			930.73	%		—		—			—			—		—		—		21,604			2,096			19,508			930.73	%

Total Rental Revenue		1,146,091		1,093,669		52,422			4.79	%		46,604		8,586			661			1,077		—		16,894		1,193,356			1,120,226			73,130			6.53	%

Real Estate Operating Expenses		413,546		391,784		21,762			5.55	%		16,939		4,105			254			531		—		4,916		430,739			401,336			29,403			7.33	%

Net Operating Income, excluding residential and hotel		732,545		701,885		30,660			4.37	%		29,665		4,481			407			546		—		11,978		762,617			718,890			43,727			6.08	%

Residential Net Operating Income(1)		1,207		1,259		(52	)		(4.13	)%		3,171		(625	)		—			—		1,210		3,648		5,588			4,282			1,306			30.50	%
Hotel Net Operating Income(1)		6,417		6,448		(31	)		(0.48	)%		—		—			—			—		—		—		6,417			6,448			(31	)		(0.48	)%

Consolidated Net Operating Income(1)		740,169		709,592		30,577			4.31	%		32,836		3,856			407			546		1,210		15,626		774,622			729,620			45,002			6.17	%

Other Revenue:
Development and management services		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			—		—		—		10,190			11,722			(1,532	)		(13.07	)%
Other Expenses:
General and administrative expense		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			—		—		—		51,075			53,176			(2,101	)		(3.95	)%
Transaction costs		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			—		—		—		535			1,098			(563	)		(51.28	)%
Depreciation and amortization		302,219		297,747		4,472			1.50	%		18,921		4,200			806			285		121		6,666		322,067			308,898			13,169			4.26	%

Total Other Expenses		302,219		297,747		4,472			1.50	%		18,921		4,200			806			285		121		6,666		373,677			363,172			10,505			2.89	%

Operating Income		437,950		411,845		26,105			6.34	%		13,915		(344	)		(399	)		261		1,089		8,960		411,135			378,170			32,965			8.72	%
Other Income:
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures																										17,912			5,650			12,262			217.03	%
Interest and other income																										2,700			3,420			(720	)		(21.05	)%
Gains from investments in securities																										369			948			(579	)		(61.08	)%
Other Expenses:
Interest expense																										217,291			224,531			(7,240	)		(3.22	)%

Income Before Gains On Sales Of Real Estate																										214,825			163,657			51,168			31.27	%
Gains on sales of real estate																										95,084			—			95,084			100.00	%

Net Income																										309,909			163,657			146,252			89.36	%
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests:
Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships																										(24,472	)		(11,907	)		(12,565	)		(105.53	)%
Noncontrolling interest—redeemable preferred units of the Operating Partnership																										(6	)		(939	)		933			99.36	%
Noncontrolling interest—common units of the Operating Partnership																										(29,530	)		(15,010	)		(14,520	)		(96.74	)%

Net Income Attributable to Boston Properties, Inc.																										255,901			135,801			120,100			88.44	%
Preferred dividends																										(5,207	)		(5,207	)		—			—	%

Net Income Attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. Common Shareholders																									$	250,694		$	130,594		$	120,100			91.96	%

(1)

For a detailed discussion of NOI, including the reasons management believes NOI is useful to investors, see page 43. Residential Net Operating Income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are comprised of Residential Revenue of $10,665 and $11,980 less Residential Expenses of $5,077 and $7,698, respectively. Hotel Net Operating Income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are comprised of Hotel Revenue of $22,488 and $20,560 less Hotel Expenses of $16,071 and $14,112, respectively, per the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Same Property Portfolio

Rental Revenue

Rental revenue from the Same Property Portfolio increased approximately $32.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014. The increase was primarily the result of increases in revenue from our leases, other recoveries and parking income and other income of approximately $28.7 million, $2.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Rental revenue from our leases increased approximately $28.7 million as a result of our average revenue per square foot increasing by approximately $2.34, contributing approximately $40.3 million, partially offset by a decrease of approximately $11.6 million due to a decrease in average occupancy from 93.0% to 91.8%.

For fiscal 2015, we project our occupancy will average approximately 91% due to several large lease expirations, which occurred during early 2015, in our Boston region. We expect our Same Property Portfolio NOI for 2015 to range from a decrease of 0.50% to an increase of 0.50% when compared to 2014.

Termination Income

Termination income increased by approximately $19.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014.

Termination income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 related to twenty-four tenants across the Same Property Portfolio and totaled approximately $21.6 million of which approximately $12.9 million, $2.6 million, $1.3 million and $0.3 million related to early terminations in our New York, San Francisco, Boston and Washington, DC regions, respectively. The termination income from the New York region was primarily due to our early termination of a tenant at 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building) and a negotiated termination with a tenant in Princeton, New Jersey in order to accommodate leasing the building to a new tenant. Approximately $5.2 million of our termination income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was non-cash and due to the acceleration of “above-” and “below-market” lease revenue and straight-line rent adjustments.

In addition, on March 11, 2015, we received a second interim distribution from our unsecured creditor claim against Lehman Brothers, Inc. totaling approximately $4.5 million, leaving a remaining claim of approximately $33.0 million (See Note 6 of the Consolidated Financial Statements). Recently, claims of similar priority to that of our remaining claim were quoted privately reflecting a value for our remaining claim of approximately $6.1 million. We were notified on August 4, 2015 that the bankruptcy court approved the trustee’s motion to make a third interim distribution to holders of claims as of July 10, 2015.

Termination income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 related to sixteen tenants across the Same Property Portfolio and totaled approximately $2.1 million of which approximately $0.5 million was related to a negotiated termination with a former tenant at Kendall Center (formerly Cambridge Center).

Real Estate Operating Expenses

Operating expenses from the Same Property Portfolio increased approximately $21.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 due primarily to (1) an increase of approximately $10.7 million, or 6.0%, in real estate taxes, which we primarily experienced in our New York CBD properties, (2) an increase of approximately $4.0 million, or 6.6%, in repairs and maintenance expense, which we primarily experienced in our Boston and New York CBD buildings and the Washington, DC region, (3) an increase of approximately $3.4 million, or 5.7%, in utilities expense in the Boston region and New York CBD buildings, (4) an increase of approximately $2.7 million, or 12.9%, in roads and grounds expense, which we primarily experienced in the Boston region and (5) an increase of approximately $1.0 million, or 1.3%, in other operating expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense for the Same Property Portfolio increased approximately $4.5 million, or 1.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to accelerated

depreciation and amortization at 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building) in New York City due to lease terminations. This was partially offset by a decrease in depreciation and amortization at 200 Clarendon Street (formerly the John Hancock Tower) in Boston, Massachusetts due to several lease expirations during 2014. Leasehold improvements and leasing commissions are depreciated and amortized over their respective lease terms, as such, when the lease term expires these assets are fully depreciated therefore causing the increase in depreciation for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014.

Properties Placed In-Service Portfolio

We placed in-service or partially placed in-service six properties between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015. Rental revenue, real estate operating expenses and depreciation and amortization expense from our Properties Placed In-Service Portfolio increased approximately $42.2 million, $13.2 million and $14.7 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 as detailed below.


Name	Quarter Initially Placed In-Service	Quarter Fully Placed In-Service	Square Feet		Rental Revenue						Real Estate Operating Expenses						Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Name	Quarter Initially Placed In-Service	Quarter Fully Placed In-Service	Square Feet		2015		2014		Change		2015		2014		Change		2015		2014		Change
					(dollars in thousands)
Office
250 West 55th Street	Third Quarter, 2013	Third Quarter, 2014		988,679	$	27,928	$	6,022	$	21,906	$	11,432	$	3,248	$	8,184	$	10,155	$	1,895	$	8,260
680 Folsom Street(1)	Fourth Quarter, 2013	Third Quarter, 2014		524,793		14,530		2,564		11,966		4,040		857		3,183		6,012		1,032		4,980
535 Mission Street	Fourth Quarter, 2014	N/A		307,000		3,708		—		3,708		1,370		—		1,370		1,127		—		1,127
690 Folsom Street	Fourth Quarter, 2014	N/A		26,080		438		—		438		97		—		97		177		—		177

				1,846,552	$	46,604	$	8,586	$	38,018	$	16,939	$	4,105	$	12,834	$	17,471	$	2,927	$	14,544

Residential
The Avant at Reston Town Center(2)	Fourth Quarter, 2013	First Quarter, 2014		355,347	$	5,185	$	996	$	4,189	$	2,014	$	1,621	$	393	$	1,450	$	1,273	$	177

				2,201,899	$	51,789	$	9,582	$	42,207	$	18,953	$	5,726	$	13,227	$	18,921	$	4,200	$	14,721

(1)	This property is a two-building complex.

(2)	This property has 359 apartment units and 26,179 net rentable square feet of retail space.

Properties in Development or Redevelopment Portfolio

During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Properties in Development or Redevelopment Portfolio consisted of our Reservoir Place North property located in Waltham, Massachusetts. We commenced redevelopment of this approximately 73,000 net rentable Class A Office property on May 1, 2015 and it has an expected stabilization date in the first quarter of 2017. Prior to the commencement of redevelopment, this building was operational and during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, had revenue of approximately $0.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively, and approximately $0.3 million and $0.5 million of operating expenses, respectively. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the building had approximately $0.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of depreciation and amortization expense.

Properties Sold Portfolio

The table below lists the properties we sold between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015. Rental revenue, real estate and operating expenses and depreciation and amortization expense from our Properties Sold Portfolio decreased approximately $22.4 million, $8.0 million and $6.5 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 as detailed below.


				Rental Revenue							Real Estate Operating Expenses							Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Name	Date sold	Property Type	Square Feet (sf) / Acres	2015		2014		Change			2015		2014		Change			2015		2014		Change
											(dollars in thousands)
Class A Office, Office/Technical and Land
Mountain View Technology Park(1)	July 29, 2014	Office / Technical	135,000 sf	$	—	$	2,244	$	(2,244	)	$	—	$	360	$	(360	)	$	—	$	1,413	$	(1,413	)
Mountain View Research Park Building Sixteen	July 29, 2014	Office / Technical	63,000 sf		—		1,283		(1,283	)		—		175		(175	)		—		864		(864	)
Broad Run Business Park	August 22, 2014	Land Parcel	15.5 acres		—		734		(734	)		—		187		(187	)		—		7		(7	)
Patriots Park(2)	October 2, 2014	Class A Office	706,000 sf		—		12,241		(12,241	)		—		4,010		(4,010	)		—		2,773		(2,773	)
130 Third Avenue	October 24, 2014	Land Parcel	N/A(3)		—		162		(162	)		—		184		(184	)		—		—		—
75 Ames Street	December 30, 2014	Land Parcel	N/A(4)		—		230		(230	)		—		—		—			—		—		—

				$	—	$	16,894	$	(16,894	)	$	—	$	4,916	$	(4,916	)	$	—	$	5,057	$	(5,057	)

Residential
Residences on The Avenue	March 17, 2015	Residential	323,050 sf (5)	$	3,230	$	8,733	$	(5,503	)	$	2,020	$	5,085	$	(3,065	)	$	121	$	1,609	$	(1,488	)

				$	3,230	$	25,627	$	(22,397	)	$	2,020	$	10,001	$	(7,981	)	$	121	$	6,666	$	(6,545	)

(1)	This property is a seven-building complex.

(2)	This property is a three-building complex.

(3)	This site is permitted for 129,000 square feet.

(4)	This sale was a conveyance to an unrelated third-party of a condominium interest.

(5)	This property has 335 apartment units and approximately 50,000 net rentable square feet of retail space.

Other Operating Income and Expense Items

Residential Net Operating Income

Net operating income for our residential properties increased by approximately $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014.

The following reflects our occupancy and rate information for The Lofts at Atlantic Wharf, the Residences on The Avenue and The Avant at Reston Town Center for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. On March 17, 2015, we sold the Residences on the Avenue and therefore there is no information shown for the six months ended June 30, 2015.


	The Lofts at Atlantic Wharf									Residences on The Avenue(1)							The Avant at Reston Town Center(2)
	2015			2014			Percentage Change			2015		2014			Percentage Change		2015			2014			Percentage Change
Average Physical Occupancy(3)		97.5	%		96.1	%		1.5	%		N/A		91.9	%		N/A		87.1	%		18.1	%		381.2	%
Average Economic Occupancy(4)		97.9	%		96.8	%		1.1	%		N/A		91.1	%		N/A		84.5	%		14.6	%		478.8	%
Average Monthly Rental Rate(5)	$	4,013		$	3,919			2.4	%		N/A	$	3,173			N/A	$	2,254		$	2,108			6.9	%
Average Rental Rate Per Occupied Square Foot	$	4.46		$	4.38			1.8	%		N/A	$	3.89			N/A	$	2.44		$	2.30			6.1	%

(1)	This property was sold during the first quarter of 2015. For the operating results refer to “Results of Operations—Properties Sold Portfolio” within “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” and Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)

This property was initially placed in-service during the fourth quarter of 2013 and fully placed in-service during the first quarter of 2014. For the operating results refer to “Results of Operations—Properties Placed in-Service Portfolio” within “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

(3)	Average Physical Occupancy is defined as the average number of occupied units divided by the total number of units, expressed as a percentage.

(4)

Average Economic Occupancy is defined as total possible revenue less vacancy loss as a percentage of total possible revenue. Total possible revenue is determined by valuing average occupied units at contract rates and average vacant units at Market Rents. Vacancy loss is determined by valuing vacant units at current Market Rents. By measuring vacant units at their Market Rents, Average Economic Occupancy takes into account the fact that units of different sizes and locations within a residential property have different economic impacts on a residential property’s total possible gross revenue. Market Rents used by us in calculating Economic Occupancy are based on the current market rates set by the managers of our residential properties based on their experience in renting their residential property’s units and publicly available market data. Trends in market rents for a region as reported by others could vary. Market Rents for a period are based on the average Market Rents during that period and do not reflect any impact for cash concessions.

(5)	Average Monthly Rental Rates are calculated by us as rental revenue in accordance with GAAP, divided by the weighted monthly average number of occupied units.

Hotel Net Operating Income

Net operating income for the Boston Marriott Cambridge hotel property decreased by approximately $31,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014. We expect our hotel net operating income for fiscal 2015 to be between $12 million and $14 million.

The following reflects our occupancy and rate information for the Boston Marriott Cambridge hotel for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.


	2015			2014			Percentage Change
Occupancy		82.8	%		82.5	%		0.4	%
Average daily rate	$	263.05		$	239.30			9.9	%
Revenue per available room, REVPAR	$	217.71		$	197.44			10.3	%

Development and Management Services

Development and management services income decreased approximately $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014. The decrease was due to a decrease in development income of approximately $2.4 million partially offset by an increase in management service income of approximately $0.9 million. The decrease in development income is primarily due to decreases in fees associated with tenant improvement project management and the development fees earned from our Boston third-party developments and our Washington, DC joint ventures. The increase in management fees is due primarily to an increase in tenant service income from our tenants. We expect our fiscal 2015 development and management services income to be between $18 million and $22 million.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses decreased approximately $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 due primarily to the timing of the recognition of expenses under the Transition Benefits Agreement that we entered into with Mortimer B. Zuckerman in 2013. Because Mr. Zuckerman remained employed by us through July 1, 2014, he received, on January 1, 2015, a lump sum payment of $6.7 million and an equity award of LTIP Units with a targeted value of approximately $11.1 million. The cash

payment and equity award vested in three equal installments on each of March 10, 2013, October 1, 2013 and July 1, 2014. As a result, we recognized approximately $4.0 million of compensation expense during the six months ended June 30, 2014 related to the Transition Benefits Agreement that did not recur in 2015. We also had an approximately $0.6 million decrease in the value of our deferred compensation plan. These decreases were partially offset by the following increases: (1) approximately $1.6 million related to the net effect of the end of the measurement period for the 2012 OPP Awards and the issuance of the 2015 MYLTIP Units (See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), (2) an approximately $0.8 million increase in health care costs and (3) approximately $0.1 million related to other general and administrative expenses, which includes compensation expense. We expect our fiscal 2015 general and administrative expenses to be between $96 million and $100 million.

Wages directly related to the development and leasing of rental properties are capitalized and included in real estate assets or deferred charges on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized over the useful lives of the real estate. Capitalized wages for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were approximately $7.6 million and $7.6 million, respectively. These costs are not included in the general and administrative expenses discussed above.

Transaction Costs

Transaction costs decreased approximately $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014. Transaction costs for both periods were primarily related to the formation of several new and pending joint ventures, pending and completed asset sales and the pursuit of other transactions, including acquisitions.

Other Income and Expense Items

Income from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

For the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014, income from unconsolidated joint ventures increased by approximately $12.3 million due primarily to an approximately $11.8 million increase in our share of net income from 901 New York Avenue in Washington, DC. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we received a distribution of approximately $24.5 million, which was generated from the excess loan proceeds from the joint venture’s refinancing of its mortgage loan to a new 10-year mortgage loan totaling $225.0 million. Our allocation of income and distributions for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was not proportionate to our nominal ownership interest as a result of the achievement of specified investment return thresholds, as provided for in the joint venture agreement.

Interest and Other Income

Interest and other income decreased approximately $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014, primarily due to a tax refund we received from the District of Columbia during the six months ended June 30, 2014 that did not recur during the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Gains from Investments in Securities

Gains from investments in securities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 related to investments that we have made to reduce our market risk relating to a deferred compensation plan that we maintain for our officers. Under this deferred compensation plan, each officer who is eligible to participate is permitted to defer a portion of the officer’s current income on a pre-tax basis and receive a tax-deferred return on these deferrals based on the performance of specific investments selected by the officer. In order to reduce our market risk relating to this plan, we typically acquire, in a separate account that is not restricted as to its use, similar or identical investments as those selected by each officer. This enables us to generally match our liabilities to our officers under the deferred compensation plan with equivalent assets and thereby limit our market risk. The performance of these investments is recorded as gains from investments in securities. During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we recognized

gains of approximately $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, on these investments. By comparison, our general and administrative expense increased by approximately $0.4 million and $1.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, as a result of increases in our liability under our deferred compensation plan that were associated with the performance of the specific investments selected by our officers participating in the plan.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased approximately $7.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 as detailed below:


Component	Change in interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to June 30, 2014
	(in thousands)
Increases to interest expense due to:
Reduction in capitalized interest(1)	$	15,770

Total increases to interest expense	$	15,770
Decreases to interest expense due to:
Redemption of $300.0 million in aggregate principal of our Operating Partnership’s 5.625% senior notes due 2015 on December 15. 2014	$	(8,470	)
Redemption of $250.0 million in aggregate principal of our Operating Partnership’s 5.000% senior notes due 2015 on December 15, 2014		(6,426	)
Repayment of $747.5 million in aggregate principal of our Operating Partnership’s 3.625% exchangeable senior notes due 2014 on February 18, 2014		(3,343	)
Interest expense associated with the adjustment for the equity component allocation of our Operating Partnership’s unsecured exchangeable debt(2)		(2,438	)
Repayment of mortgage financings(3)		(1,769	)
Other interest expense (excluding senior notes)		(307	)
Amortization of finance fees		(257	)

Total decreases to interest expense	$	(23,010	)

Total change in interest expense	$	(7,240	)

(1)	The decrease was primarily due to the completion of several development projects, including 250 West 55th Street, 680 Folsom Street and The Avant at Reston Town Center.

(2)	All of our Operating Partnership’s exchangeable senior notes were repaid as of February 18, 2014.

(3)	Represents the repayment of New Dominion Technology Park Building Two mortgage loan.

Interest expense directly related to the development of rental properties are capitalized and included in real estate assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized over the useful lives of the real estate. As properties are placed in-service, we cease capitalizing interest and interest is then expensed. Interest capitalized for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was approximately $16.8 million and $32.6 million, respectively. These costs are not included in the interest expense referenced above.

We anticipate net interest expense for 2015 will be approximately $422 million to $431 million. This estimate assumes approximately $31 million to $38 million of capitalized interest. These estimates also assume that we will not incur any additional indebtedness, make additional prepayments or repurchases of existing indebtedness and that there will not be any fluctuations in interest rates or any changes in our development activity.

At June 30, 2015, our variable rate debt consisted of our Operating Partnership’s $1.0 billion Unsecured Line of Credit, of which no amount was outstanding at June 30, 2015. For a summary of our consolidated debt as of June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 refer to the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capitalization—Debt Financing” within “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Gains on Sales of Real Estate

On March 17, 2015, we completed the sale of our Residences on The Avenue property located in Washington, DC for a gross sale price of $196.0 million. Net cash proceeds totaled approximately $192.5 million, resulting in a gain on sale of real estate totaling approximately $91.4 million. We have agreed to provide net operating income support of up to $6.0 million should the property’s net operating income fail to achieve certain thresholds, which has been recorded as a reduction to the gain on sale. The Residences on The Avenue is comprised of 335 apartment units and approximately 50,000 net rentable square feet of retail space, subject to a ground lease that expires on February 1, 2068.

Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships

Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships increased by approximately $12.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 as detailed below.


Property	Date of Consolidation	Partners’ noncontrolling interest for the six months ended June 30,
Property	Date of Consolidation	2015			2014			Change
		(in thousands)
505 9th Street(1)	October 1, 2007	$	1,283		$	1,177		$	106
Fountain Square(2)	October 4, 2012		4,441			6,469			(2,028	)
767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building)(3)	May 31, 2013		(10,639	)		(9,168	)		(1,471	)
Times Square Tower	October 9, 2013		13,514			13,429			85
601 Lexington Avenue	October 30, 2014		9,129			—			9,129
100 Federal Street	October 30, 2014		2,030			—			2,030
Atlantic Wharf Office	October 30, 2014		4,714			—			4,714

		$	24,472		$	11,907		$	12,565

(1)

On July 29, 2015, we executed a binding agreement for the sale of this property. The sale is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions and, although there can be no assurance that the sale will be consummated on the terms currently contemplated or at all, it is expected to close by the end of the third quarter of 2015.

(2)

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we made an out-of-period adjustment of approximately $2.4 million related to the cumulative non-cash adjustment to the accretion of the changes in the redemption value of the noncontrolling interest (See Notes 2 and 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(3)

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the partners’ noncontrolling interest allocation of net income decreased due to the acceleration of depreciation and amortization expense associated with our termination of a tenant at this building. The net loss allocation is primarily due to the partners’ share of the interest expense for the outside members’ notes payable which was $15.0 million and $13.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Noncontrolling interest—Common Units of the Operating Partnership

Noncontrolling interest-common units of the Operating Partnership increased by approximately $14.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 due primarily to increases in allocable income, which included an approximately $9.9 million gain related to the sale of real estate and the noncontrolling interest’s ownership percentage.

Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2015 to the three months ended June 30, 2014.

The table below shows selected operating information for the Same Property Portfolio and the Total Property Portfolio. The Same Property Portfolio consists of 147 properties totaling approximately 38.3 million net rentable square feet of space, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures. The Same Property Portfolio includes properties acquired or placed in-service on or prior to April 1, 2014 and owned and in service through June 30, 2015. The Total Property Portfolio includes the effects of the other properties either placed in-service, acquired or in development or redevelopment after April 1, 2014 or disposed of on or prior to June 30, 2015. This table includes a reconciliation from the Same Property Portfolio to the Total Property Portfolio by also providing information for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 with respect to the properties that were placed in-service, acquired, in development or redevelopment or sold. For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 we had no properties that were acquired.


	Same Property Portfolio										Properties Placed In-Service Portfolio				Properties in Development or Redevelopment Portfolio					Properties Sold Portfolio				Total Property Portfolio
(dollars in thousands)	2015		2014		Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change			2015		2014		2015			2014		2015		2014		2015			2014			Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change
Rental Revenue:
Rental Revenue	$	564,499	$	546,459	$	18,040			3.30	%	$	24,819	$	7,977	$	147		$	557	$	—	$	8,644	$	589,465		$	563,637		$	25,828			4.58	%
Termination Income		6,680		986		5,694			577.48	%		—		—		—			—		—		—		6,680			986			5,694			577.48	%

Total Rental Revenue		571,179		547,445		23,734			4.34	%		24,819		7,977		147			557		—		8,644		596,145			564,623			31,522			5.58	%

Real Estate Operating Expenses		204,312		193,335		10,977			5.68	%		8,586		2,697		35			289		—		2,389		212,933			198,710			14,223			7.16	%

Net Operating Income, excluding residential and hotel		366,867		354,110		12,757			3.60	%		16,233		5,280		112			268		—		6,255		383,212			365,913			17,299			4.73	%

Residential Net Operating Income(1)		2,280		469		1,811			386.14	%		—		—		—			—		—		1,893		2,280			2,362			(82	)		(3.47	)%
Hotel Net Operating Income(1)		4,908		5,052		(144	)		(2.85	)%		—		—		—			—		—		—		4,908			5,052			(144	)		(2.85	)%

Consolidated Net Operating Income(1)		374,055		359,631		14,424			4.01	%		16,233		5,280		112			268		—		8,148		390,400			373,327			17,073			4.57	%

Other Revenue:
Development and management services		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—		—		—		4,862			6,506			(1,644	)		(25.27	)%
Other Expenses:
General and administrative expense		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—		—		—		22,284			23,271			(987	)		(4.24	)%
Transaction costs		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—		—		—		208			661			(453	)		(68.53	)%
Depreciation and amortization		157,898		148,632		9,266			6.23	%		9,280		2,525		666			142		—		3,329		167,844			154,628			13,216			8.55	%

Total Other Expenses		157,898		148,632		9,266			6.23	%		9,280		2,525		666			142		—		3,329		190,336			178,560			11,776			6.59	%

Operating Income		216,157		210,999		5,158			2.44	%		6,953		2,755		(554	)		126		—		4,819		204,926			201,273			3,653			1.81	%
Other Income:
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures																									3,078			2,834			244			8.61	%
Interest and other income																									1,293			2,109			(816	)		(38.69	)%
Gains (losses) from investments in securities																									(24	)		662			(686	)		(103.63	)%
Other Expenses:
Interest expense																									108,534			110,977			(2,443	)		(2.20	)%

Net Income																									100,739			95,901			4,838			5.04	%
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests:
Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships																									(9,264	)		(7,553	)		(1,711	)		(22.65	)%
Noncontrolling interest—redeemable preferred units of the Operating Partnership																									(3	)		(320	)		317			99.06	%
Noncontrolling interest—common units of the Operating Partnership																									(9,394	)		(8,883	)		(511	)		(5.75	)%

Net Income Attributable to Boston Properties, Inc.																									82,078			79,145			2,933			3.71	%
Preferred dividends																									(2,618	)		(2,618	)		—			—	%

Net Income Attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. Common Shareholders																								$	79,460		$	76,527		$	2,933			3.83	%

(1)

For a detailed discussion of NOI, including the reasons management believes NOI is useful to investors, see page 43. Residential Net Operating Income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are comprised of Residential Revenue of $3,811 and $6,298 less Residential Expenses of $1,531 and $3,936, respectively. Hotel Net Operating Income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are comprised of Hotel Revenue of $13,403 and $12,367 less Hotel Expenses of $8,495 and $7,315, respectively, per the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Same Property Portfolio

Rental Revenue

Rental revenue from the Same Property Portfolio increased approximately $18.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014. The increase was primarily the result of an increase of approximately $16.1 million in revenue from our leases and increases in other recoveries, parking income and other income of approximately $0.9 million, $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Rental revenue from our leases increased approximately $16.1 million as a result of our average revenue per square foot increasing by approximately $2.66, contributing approximately $22.8 million, partially offset by a decrease of approximately $6.7 million due to a decrease in average occupancy from 92.7% to 91.4%.

Termination Income

Termination income increased by approximately $5.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014.

Termination income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 related to fifteen tenants across the Same Property Portfolio and totaled approximately $6.7 million, of which approximately $4.3 million, $1.2 million, $1.1 million and $0.1 million related to early terminations in our New York, San Francisco, Boston and Washington, DC regions, respectively. The termination income from the New York region was primarily due to our early termination of a tenant at 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building) and a negotiated termination with a tenant in Princeton, New Jersey in order to accommodate leasing the building to a new tenant. Approximately $4.7 million of our termination income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was non-cash and due to the acceleration of “above-” and “below-market” lease revenue and straight-line rent adjustments.

Termination income for the three months ended June 30, 2014 related to twelve tenants across the Same Property Portfolio and totaled approximately $1.0 million.

Real Estate Operating Expenses

Operating expenses from the Same Property Portfolio increased approximately $11.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 due primarily to (1) an increase of approximately $5.6 million, or 6.3%, in real estate taxes, which we primarily experienced in our New York region, (2) an increase of approximately $2.5 million, or 7.9%, in repairs and maintenance expense in the Boston and New York regions, (3) an increase of approximately $1.3 million, or 4.8%, in utilities expense primarily due to an increase in electricity expense in the Boston and New York regions and (4) an increase of approximately $1.6 million, or 3.5%, in other operating expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense for the Same Property Portfolio increased approximately $9.3 million, or 6.2%, for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to accelerated depreciation and amortization at 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building) in New York City due to lease terminations. This was partially offset by a decrease in depreciation and amortization at 200 Clarendon Street (formerly the John Hancock Tower) in Boston, Massachusetts due to several lease expirations during 2014. Leasehold improvements and leasing commissions are depreciated and amortized over their respective lease terms, as such, when the lease term expires these assets are fully depreciated therefore causing the increase in depreciation for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014.

Properties Placed In-Service Portfolio

We placed in-service or partially placed in-service five properties between April 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015. Rental revenue, real estate operating expenses and depreciation and amortization expense from our Properties Placed In-Service Portfolio increased approximately $16.8 million, $5.9 million and $6.8 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 as detailed below.


Name	Quarter Initially Placed In-Service	Quarter Fully Placed In-Service	Square Feet		Rental Revenue						Real Estate Operating Expenses						Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Name	Quarter Initially Placed In-Service	Quarter Fully Placed In-Service	Square Feet		2015		2014		Change		2015		2014		Change		2015		2014		Change
											(dollars in thousands)
250 West 55th Street	Third Quarter, 2013	Third Quarter, 2014		988,679	$	15,022	$	5,421	$	9,601	$	5,661	$	1,881	$	3,780	$	5,112	$	1,508	$	3,604
680 Folsom Street(1)	Fourth Quarter, 2013	Third Quarter, 2014		524,793		7,279		2,556		4,723		2,167		816		1,351		3,483		1,017		2,466
535 Mission Street	Fourth Quarter, 2014	N/A		307,000		2,255		—		2,255		695		—		695		594		—		594
690 Folsom Street	Fourth Quarter, 2014	N/A		26,080		263		—		263		63		—		63		91		—		91

				1,846,552	$	24,819	$	7,977	$	16,842	$	8,586	$	2,697	$	5,889	$	9,280	$	2,525	$	6,755

(1)	This property is a two-building complex.

Properties in Development or Redevelopment Portfolio

During the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Properties in Development or Redevelopment Portfolio consisted of our Reservoir Place North property located in Waltham, Massachusetts. We commenced redevelopment of this approximately 73,000 net rentable Class A Office property on May 1, 2015 and it has an expected stabilization date in the first quarter of 2017. Prior to the commencement of redevelopment, this building was operational and during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, had revenue of approximately $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and approximately $35,000 and $0.3 million of operating expenses, respectively. In addition, during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the building had approximately $0.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of depreciation and amortization expense.

Properties Sold Portfolio

The table below lists the properties we sold between April 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015. Rental revenue, real estate and operating expenses and depreciation and amortization expense from our Properties Sold Portfolio decreased approximately $13.1 million, $4.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 as detailed below.


				Rental Revenue							Real Estate Operating Expenses							Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Name	Date sold	Property Type	Square Feet (sf) / Acres	2015		2014		Change			2015		2014		Change			2015		2014		Change
											(dollars in thousands)
Class A Office, Office/Technical and Land
Mountain View Technology Park(1)	July 29, 2014	Office / Technical	135,000 sf	$	—	$	1,126	$	(1,126	)	$	—	$	184	$	(184	)	$	—	$	707	$	(707	)
Mountain View Research Park Building Sixteen	July 29, 2014	Office / Technical	63,000 sf		—		640		(640	)		—		87		(87	)		—		434		(434	)
Broad Run Business Park	August 22, 2014	Land Parcel	15.5 acres		—		367		(367	)		—		93		(93	)		—		4		(4	)
Patriots Park(2)	October 2, 2014	Class A Office	706,000 sf		—		6,320		(6,320	)		—		1,949		(1,949	)		—		1,379		(1,379	)
130 Third Avenue	October 24, 2014	Land Parcel	N/A(3)		—		76		(76	)		—		76		(76	)		—		—		—
75 Ames Street	December 30, 2014	Land Parcel	N/A(4)		—		115		(115	)		—		—		—			—		—		—

				$	—	$	8,644	$	(8,644	)	$	—	$	2,389	$	(2,389	)	$	—	$	2,524	$	(2,524	)

Residential
Residences on The Avenue	March 17, 2015	Residential	323,050 sf (5)	$	—	$	4,445	$	(4,445	)	$	—	$	2,552	$	(2,552	)	$	—	$	805	$	(805	)

				$	—	$	13,089	$	(13,089	)	$	—	$	4,941	$	(4,941	)	$	—	$	3,329	$	(3,329	)

(1)	This property is a seven-building complex.

(2)	This property is a three-building complex.

(3)	This site is permitted for 129,000 square feet.

(4)	This sale was a conveyance to an unrelated third-party of a condominium interest.

(5)	This property has 335 apartment units and approximately 50,000 net rentable square feet of retail space.

Operating Income and Expense Items

Residential Net Operating Income

Net operating income for our residential properties decreased by approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014.

The following reflects our occupancy and rate information for The Lofts at Atlantic Wharf and The Avant at Reston Town Center for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. On March 17, 2015, we sold the Residences on The Avenue and therefore there is no information shown for the three months ended June 30, 2015.


	The Lofts at Atlantic Wharf									Residences on The Avenue(1)							The Avant at Reston Town Center(2)
	2015			2014			Percentage Change			2015		2014			Percentage Change		2015			2014			Percentage Change
Average Physical Occupancy(3)		96.9	%		95.4	%		1.6	%		N/A		91.3	%		N/A		93.9	%		25.7	%		265.4	%
Average Economic Occupancy(4)		96.9	%		95.8	%		1.1	%		N/A		90.5	%		N/A		92.1	%		21.9	%		320.5	%
Average Monthly Rental Rate(5)	$	4,013		$	3,912			2.6	%		N/A	$	3,165			N/A	$	2,263		$	2,203			2.7	%
Average Rental Rate Per Occupied Square Foot	$	4.48		$	4.39			2.1	%		N/A	$	3.88			N/A	$	2.42		$	2.40			0.8	%

(1)	This property was sold during the first quarter of 2015. For the operating results refer to “Results of Operations—Properties Sold Portfolio” within “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)	This property was initially placed in-service during the fourth quarter of 2013 and fully placed in-service during the first quarter of 2014.

(3)	Average Physical Occupancy is defined as the average number of occupied units divided by the total number of units, expressed as a percentage.

(4)

(5)	Average Monthly Rental Rates are calculated by us as rental revenue in accordance with GAAP, divided by the weighted monthly average number of occupied units.

Hotel Net Operating Income

Net operating income for the Boston Marriott Cambridge hotel property decreased by approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014.

The following reflects our occupancy and rate information for the Boston Marriott Cambridge hotel for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.


	2015			2014			Percentage Change
Occupancy		86.7	%		87.3	%		(0.7	)%
Average daily rate	$	298.70		$	273.22			9.3	%
Revenue per available room, REVPAR	$	259.10		$	238.55			8.6	%

Development and Management Services

Development and management services income decreased approximately $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014. Development income decreased by approximately $1.9 million, which was partially offset by an increase in management service income of approximately $0.3 million. The decrease in development income is primarily due to decreases in tenant improvement project management fees and in development fees from our Boston third-party developments and our Washington, DC joint ventures.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses decreased approximately $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 due primarily to a decrease in overall compensation expense.

Wages directly related to the development and leasing of rental properties are capitalized and included in real estate assets or deferred charges on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized over the useful lives of the real estate. Capitalized wages for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were approximately $4.0 million and $4.1 million, respectively. These costs are not included in the general and administrative expenses discussed above.

Transaction Costs

Transaction costs decreased approximately $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014. Transaction costs for both periods were primarily related to the formation of several new and pending joint ventures, pending and completed asset sales and the pursuit of other transactions, including acquisitions.

Other Income and Expense Items

Income from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

For the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014, income from unconsolidated joint ventures increased by approximately $0.2 million, which was primarily due to termination income we received from a tenant at 540 Madison Avenue in New York City.

Interest and Other Income

Interest and other income decreased approximately $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014, primarily due to a tax refund we received from the District of Columbia during the three months ended June 30, 2014 that did not recur during the three months ended June 30, 2015.

Gains (losses) from Investments in Securities

Gains (losses) from investments in securities for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 related to investments that we have made to reduce our market risk relating to a deferred compensation plan that we maintain for our officers. Under this deferred compensation plan, each officer who is eligible to participate is permitted to defer a portion of the officer’s current income on a pre-tax basis and receive a tax-deferred return on these deferrals based on the performance of specific investments selected by the officer. In order to reduce our market risk relating to this plan, we typically acquire, in a separate account that is not restricted as to its use, similar or identical investments as those selected by each officer. This enables us to generally match our liabilities to our officers under the deferred compensation plan with equivalent assets and thereby limit our market risk. The performance of these investments is recorded as gains (losses) from investments in securities. During the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we recognized gains (losses) of approximately $(24,000) and $0.7 million, respectively, on these investments. By comparison, our general and administrative expense increased (decreased) by approximately $(24,000) and $0.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, as a result of increases (decreases) in our liability under our deferred compensation plan that were associated with the performance of the specific investments selected by our officers participating in the plan.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased approximately $2.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 as detailed below:


Component	Change in interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to June 30, 2014
	(in thousands)
Increases to interest expense due to:
Reduction in capitalized interest(1)	$	6,026

Total increases to interest expense	$	6,026
Decreases to interest expense due to:
Redemption of $300.0 million in aggregate principal of our Operating Partnership’s 5.625% senior notes due 2015 on December 15, 2014	$	(4,235	)
Redemption of $250.0 million in aggregate principal of our Operating Partnership’s 5.000% senior notes due 2015 on December 15, 2014		(3,213	)
Repayment of mortgage financings(2)		(889	)
Other interest expense (excluding senior notes)		(132	)

Total decreases to interest expense	$	(8,469	)

Total change in interest expense	$	(2,443	)

(1)	The decrease was primarily due to the completion of several development projects, including 250 West 55th Street, 680 Folsom Street and The Avant at Reston Town Center.

(2)	Represents the repayment of New Dominion Technology Park Building Two mortgage loan.

Interest expense directly related to the development of rental properties are capitalized and included in real estate assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized over the useful lives of the real estate. As properties are placed in-service, we cease capitalizing interest and interest is then expensed. Interest capitalized for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was approximately $8.9 million and $14.9 million, respectively. These costs are not included in the interest expense referenced above.

Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships

Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships increased by approximately $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 as detailed below.


Property	Date of Consolidation	Partners’ noncontrolling interests for the three months ended June 30,
Property	Date of Consolidation	2015			2014			Change
		(in thousands)
505 9th Street(1)	October 1, 2007	$	615		$	602		$	13
Fountain Square(2)	October 4, 2012		2,213			4,701			(2,488	)
767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building)(3)	May 31, 2013		(7,853	)		(4,524	)		(3,329	)
Times Square Tower	October 9, 2013		6,759			6,774			(15	)
601 Lexington Avenue	October 30, 2014		4,023			—			4,023
100 Federal Street	October 30, 2014		1,142			—			1,142
Atlantic Wharf Office	October 30, 2014		2,365			—			2,365

		$	9,264		$	7,553		$	1,711

(1)

(2)

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we made an out-of-period adjustment of approximately $2.4 million related to the cumulative non-cash adjustment to the accretion of the changes in the redemption value of the noncontrolling interest (See Notes 2 and 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(3)

During the three months ended June 30, 2015, the partners’ noncontrolling interest allocation of net income decreased due to the acceleration of depreciation and amortization expense associated with our termination of a tenant at this building. The net loss allocation is primarily due to the partners’ share of the interest expense for the outside members’ notes payable which was $7.6 million and $7.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Noncontrolling interest—Common Units of the Operating Partnership

Noncontrolling interest-common units of the Operating Partnership increased by approximately $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014 due primarily to increases in allocable income and the noncontrolling interest’s ownership percentage.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Our principal liquidity needs for the next twelve months and beyond are to:

•

fund normal recurring expenses;

•

meet debt service and principal repayment obligations, including balloon payments on maturing debt;

•

fund capital expenditures, including major renovations, tenant improvements and leasing costs;

•

fund development costs;

•

fund possible property acquisitions;

•

fund dividend requirements on our Series B Preferred Stock; and

•

make the minimum distribution required to maintain our REIT qualification under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

We expect to satisfy these needs using one or more of the following:

•

cash flow from operations;

•

distribution of cash flows from joint ventures;

•

cash and cash equivalent balances;

•

issuances of our equity securities and/or additional preferred or common units of partnership interest in our Operating Partnership;

•

our Operating Partnership’s Unsecured Line of Credit or other short-term bridge facilities;

•

construction loans;

•

long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness (including unsecured exchangeable indebtedness); and

•

sales of real estate or ownership interests in our assets.

We draw on multiple financing sources to fund our long-term capital needs. Our current consolidated development properties are expected to be funded with our available cash balances. Our Operating Partnership’s Unsecured Line of Credit is utilized primarily as a bridge facility to fund acquisition opportunities, refinance outstanding indebtedness and meet short-term development and working capital needs. Although we may seek to fund our development projects with construction loans, which may be guaranteed by our Operating Partnership, the financing for each particular project ultimately depends on several factors, including, among others, the project’s size and duration, the extent of pre-leasing and our available cash and access to cost effective capital at the given time.

The following table presents information on properties under construction as of June 30, 2015 (dollars in thousands):


Construction Properties	Estimated Stabilization Date	Location	# of Buildings		Estimated Square Feet		Investment to Date(1)		Estimated Total Investment(1)		Percentage Leased(2)
Annapolis Junction Building Seven (50% ownership)(3)	Third Quarter, 2015	Annapolis, MD		1		127,229	$	17,235	$	17,500		100	%
690 Folsom Street(4)	First Quarter, 2016	San Francisco, CA		1		26,080		14,637		17,900		100	%
804 Carnegie Center	First Quarter, 2016	Princeton, NJ		1		130,000		22,548		47,000		100	%
99 Third Avenue Retail	Second Quarter, 2016	Waltham, MA		1		16,500		14,877		16,900		84	%
535 Mission Street(5)	Third Quarter, 2016	San Francisco, CA		1		307,000		185,491		215,000		81	%
1265 Main Street (50% ownership)	Fourth Quarter, 2016	Waltham, MA		1		115,000		3,621		26,090		100	%
Prudential Center Retail Expansion	Fourth Quarter, 2016	Boston, MA		—		15,000		6,233		9,980		100	%
Annapolis Junction Building Eight (50% ownership)(3)	First Quarter, 2017	Annapolis, MD		1		125,000		12,000		18,500		—	%
10 CityPoint	Second Quarter, 2017	Waltham, MA		1		245,000		41,245		100,400		74	%
601 Massachusetts Avenue	Fourth Quarter, 2017	Washington, DC		1		478,000		280,715		360,760		83	%
888 Boylston Street	Fourth Quarter, 2017	Boston, MA		1		425,000		80,973		271,500		63	%
Salesforce Tower (95% ownership)	First Quarter, 2019	San Francisco, CA		1		1,400,000		380,556		1,073,500		51	%
Dock72 at the Brooklyn Navy Yard (50% ownership)	First Quarter, 2020	Brooklyn, NY		1		670,000		9,303		204,900		33	%

Total Properties under Construction				12		4,079,809		1,069,434		2,379,930		60	%
Redevelopment properties
Reservoir Place North	First Quarter, 2017	Waltham, MA		1		73,000		752		24,510		—	%

Total Properties under Construction and Redevelopment				13		4,152,809	$	1,070,186	$	2,404,440		59	%

(1)	Represents our share. Includes net revenue during lease up period, acquisition expenses and approximately $87.0 million of construction cost and leasing commission accruals.

(2)	Represents percentage leased as of August 3, 2015, includes leases with future commencement dates.

(3)	This project has a construction loan.

(4)	As of August 3, 2015, this property was 55% placed in-service.

(5)	As of August 3, 2015, this property was 41% placed in-service.

Contractual rental revenue, recoveries from tenants, other income from operations, available cash balances and draws on our Operating Partnership’s Unsecured Line of Credit are our principal sources of capital used to pay operating expenses, debt service, recurring capital expenditures and the minimum distribution required to enable us to maintain our REIT qualification. We seek to maximize income from our existing properties by maintaining quality standards for our properties that promote high occupancy rates and permit increases in rental rates while reducing tenant turnover and controlling operating expenses. Our sources of revenue also include third-party fees generated by our property management, leasing, and development and construction businesses, as well as the sale of assets from time to time. We believe our revenue, together with our cash balances and proceeds from financing activities, will continue to provide the necessary funds for our short-term liquidity needs.

Material adverse changes in one or more sources of capital may adversely affect our net cash flows. Such changes, in turn, could adversely affect our ability to fund dividends and distributions, debt service payments and tenant improvements. In addition, a material adverse change in the cash provided by our operations may affect our ability to comply with the financial covenants under our Operating Partnership’s Unsecured Line of Credit and unsecured senior notes.

Our primary uses of capital will be the completion of our ongoing developments, which, through 2019, have remaining costs to fund of approximately $1.3 billion, and our 2016 and 2017 debt maturities, which are discussed below. We believe that our strong liquidity, including available cash as of August 3, 2015 of

approximately $1.1 billion, which includes approximately $192.4 million of cash held in escrows which is being held for possible investment in a like-kind exchange in accordance with Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, the approximately $969.9 million available under our Operating Partnership’s Unsecured Line of Credit and proceeds from potential asset sales provide sufficient liquidity to fund our remaining capital requirements on existing development projects and pursue additional attractive investment opportunities. We also have full availability under our $600 million ATM program.

In 2015, we commenced approximately $486 million, on a gross basis, of new projects with a target of approximately $1 billion in new development and redevelopment project starts for the year.

We have no significant debt maturities during 2015. However, we are focused on our maturities in 2016 and 2017, which, excluding our 505 9th Street, N.W. property in Washington, DC that is under agreement for sale, consist of eight mortgage loans totaling approximately $3.6 billion (of which our share of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures is approximately $2.9 billion). These loans have a weighted-average coupon/stated interest rate of approximately 5.8% per annum.

To reduce the risk associated with future interest rate increases, we have entered into nine forward-starting interest rate swap contracts which fix the 10-year swap rate at a weighted-average rate of 2.46% per annum on notional amounts aggregating $350 million. These swaps are targeting the refinancing of our $750 million mortgage loan at 599 Lexington Avenue in New York, which has a maturity date of March 1, 2017, and can be prepaid without penalty beginning in September 2016. In addition, 767 Fifth Partners LLC, which is the consolidated entity (in which we have a 60% interest and owns 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building) in New York City), entered into nine forward-starting interest rate swap contracts, which fix the 10-year swap rate at a weighted-average rate of approximately 2.80% per annum on notional amounts aggregating $250 million. These swaps are targeting the refinancing of the property’s mortgage loans totaling $1.6 billion that mature on October 7, 2017 but can be prepaid without penalty beginning in June 2017.

We plan on refinancing in late 2016 and early 2017 our remaining maturing mortgage loans that are not being targeted by our interest rate swap strategy. We continue to monitor opportunities to accelerate these financings which could occur earlier in 2016 or even late in 2015 and may result in a one-time charge for the prepayment premium.

The bond market has experienced some rate and spread volatility over the past few months from global events but debt issuances continue to be well received in both the public and private markets and we believe our current borrowing cost for unsecured senior notes having a maturity in 10 years is attractive and less than 4% per annum. Given the relatively low interest rates currently available to us in the debt markets, we may seek to enhance our liquidity in the future, which may result in us carrying additional cash and cash equivalents pending our Operating Partnership’s use of the proceeds. In order to reduce future cash interest payments, as well as future amounts due at maturity or upon redemption, we may also, from time to time, purchase unsecured senior notes for cash in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, or both. We will evaluate any such potential transactions in light of then-existing market conditions, taking into account the trading prices of the notes, our current liquidity and prospects for future access to capital.

REIT Tax Distribution Considerations

Dividend

As a REIT we are subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we currently distribute at least 90% of our annual taxable income. Our policy is to distribute at least 100% of our taxable income to avoid paying federal tax. On December 8, 2014, we announced that our Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $4.50 per common share payable on January 28, 2015 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 31, 2014. The decision to declare a special dividend was primarily a result of the taxable gains associated with the sale of approximately $2.3 billion of

assets during 2014, partially offset by our election to deduct costs that were capitalized in prior years that may now be deducted under the new Tangible Property Regulations, discussed below. The Board of Directors did not make any change in our policy with respect to regular quarterly dividends. Holders of common units of limited partnership interest in Boston Properties Limited Partnership, our Operating Partnership, as of the close of business on December 31, 2014 received the same distribution on January 28, 2015. Our Board of Directors will continue to evaluate our dividend rate in light of our actual and projected taxable income, liquidity requirements and other circumstances, and there can be no assurance that the future dividends declared by our Board of Directors will not differ materially (See “Application of Recent Regulations” and “Sales” below).

Application of Recent Regulations

In September 2013, the Internal Revenue Service released final regulations governing when taxpayers like us must capitalize and depreciate costs for acquiring, maintaining, repairing and replacing tangible property and when they can deduct such costs. These final regulations are effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2014. These regulations permitted us to deduct certain types of expenditures that were previously required to be capitalized by us. They also allowed us to make a one-time election to immediately deduct certain amounts that were capitalized in previous years that are not required to be capitalized under the new regulations. We analyzed how the application of the new regulations affects our business and decided to make the election for the 2014 tax year. Although such an election did not have a material impact on our GAAP financial statements or Funds from Operations, it materially reduced our taxable income and therefore our dividend payout requirements under applicable REIT tax regulations for 2014. It also could have an impact on our dividend payout requirements in subsequent years, as the amounts deducted in 2014 will no longer be depreciated over time, and amounts expended and deducted in future periods will vary, potentially resulting in more variation in our distribution requirement from year to year depending on our annual cost of now-deductible expenditures that previously would have been capitalized. Although we made the election for tax year 2014, there can be no assurance concerning the impact, if any, on the dividends declared by our Board of Directors in subsequent taxable years.

Sales

To the extent that we sell assets at a taxable gain and cannot efficiently use the proceeds in a tax deferred manner for either our development activities or attractive acquisitions, we would, at the appropriate time, decide whether it is better to declare a special dividend, adopt a stock repurchase program, reduce our indebtedness or retain the cash for future investment opportunities. Such a decision will depend on many factors including, among others, the timing, availability and terms of development and acquisition opportunities, our then-current and anticipated leverage, the cost and availability of capital from other sources, the price of our common stock and REIT distribution requirements. At a minimum, we expect that we would distribute at least that amount of proceeds necessary for us to avoid paying corporate level tax on the applicable gains realized from any asset sales.

Cash Flow Summary

The following summary discussion of our cash flows is based on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and is not meant to be an all-inclusive discussion of the changes in our cash flows for the periods presented below.

Cash and cash equivalents were approximately $1.3 billion and $1.0 billion at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, representing an increase of approximately $0.3 billion. The following table sets forth changes in cash flows:


	Six months ended June 30,
	2015			2014			Increase (Decrease)
	(in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	443,076		$	308,993		$	134,083
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		179,165			(346,571	)		525,736
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,042,569	)		(1,290,983	)		248,414

Our principal source of cash flow is related to the operation of our properties. The average term of our in-place tenant leases, including our unconsolidated joint ventures, is approximately 6.7 years with occupancy rates historically in the range of 90% to 94%. Our properties generate a relatively consistent stream of cash flow that provides us with resources to pay operating expenses, debt service and fund quarterly dividend and distribution payment requirements. In addition, over the past several years, we have raised capital through the sale of some of our properties, secured and unsecured borrowings and equity offerings.

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, our total dividends payments exceeded our cash flow from operating activities due to the special dividend which was declared in December 2014 and paid to common stockholders and common unitholders of our Operating Partnership in January 2015. The cash flows distributed were primarily a result of the taxable gains associated with the sale of approximately $2.3 billion of assets during 2014 partially offset by our election to deduct costs that were capitalized in prior years that may now be deducted under the new Tangible Property Regulations and were included as part of cash flows provided by financing activities. Dividends will generally exceed cash flows from operating activities during periods in which we sell significant real estate assets and the distribution of gains occurs in a different period.

Cash is provided by (used in) investing activities to fund acquisitions, development, net investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and recurring and nonrecurring capital expenditures. We selectively invest in new projects that enable us to take advantage of our development, leasing, financing and property management skills and invest in existing buildings to enhance or maintain their market position. Cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 consisted primarily of the proceeds from the sales of real estate partially offset by funding of our development projects. Cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 consisted primarily of funding our development projects, as detailed below:


	Six months ended June 30,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Construction in progress(1)	$	(154,430	)	$	(206,603	)
Building and other capital improvements		(48,133	)		(37,285	)
Tenant improvements		(51,444	)		(53,935	)
Proceeds from the sales of real estate(2)		194,821			—
Proceeds from sales of real estate placed in escrow(2)		(200,612	)		—
Proceeds from sales of real estate released from escrow(2)		441,903			—
Cash placed in escrow for land sale contracts		(7,111	)		—
Cash released from escrow for land sale contracts		758			—
Deposit on real estate		(5,000	)		—
Capital contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures(3)		(14,989	)		(47,767	)
Capital distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures(4)		24,527			357
Investments in securities, net		(1,125	)		(1,338	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	$	179,165		$	(346,571	)

(1)

Construction in progress for the six months ended June 30, 2014 includes ongoing expenditures associated with The Avant at Reston Town Center, 250 West 55th Street and 680 Folsom Street, which were fully or partially placed in service during the six months ended June 30, 2014. In addition, we incurred costs associated with our continued development of 535 Mission Street, 601 Massachusetts Avenue, 804 Carnegie Center, Salesforce Tower, 888 Boylston Street, 10 CityPoint, 99 Third Avenue Retail and 690 Folsom Street. Construction in progress for the six months ended June 30, 2015 includes ongoing expenditures associated with 690 Folsom Street and 535 Mission Street, which were partially placed in-service during the six months ended June 30, 2015. In addition, we incurred costs associated with our continued development of 601 Massachusetts Avenue, 804 Carnegie Center, Salesforce Tower, 888 Boylston Street, 10 CityPoint, 99 Third Avenue Retail and the Prudential Center retail expansion.

(2)

On February 19, 2015, we completed the sale of a parcel of land within our Washingtonian North property located in Gaithersburg, Maryland for a gross sale price of $8.7 million. Net cash proceeds totaled approximately $8.3 million, resulting in a gain on sale of real estate totaling approximately $3.7 million. The parcel contains approximately 8.5 acres of our approximately 27 acre property. As of June 30, 2015, we had released from escrow approximately $8.3 million of the proceeds that were being held for possible investment in a like-kind exchange in accordance with Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

On October 24, 2014, we completed the sale of a parcel of land at 130 Third Avenue in Waltham, Massachusetts that is permitted for 129,000 square feet for a sale price of approximately $14.3 million. Net cash proceeds totaled approximately $13.6 million. As of June 30, 2015, we had released from escrow approximately $13.6 million of the proceeds that were being held for possible investment in a like-kind exchange in accordance with Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

On October 2, 2014, we completed the sale of Patriots Park located in Reston, Virginia for a gross sale price of $321.0 million. Patriots Park consists of three Class A office properties aggregating approximately 706,000 net rentable square feet. Net cash proceeds totaled approximately $319.1 million. As of June 30, 2015, we had released from escrow approximately $320.0 million of the proceeds that were being held for possible investment in a like-kind exchange in accordance with Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

On August 22, 2014, we completed the sale of a parcel of land within our Broad Run Business Park property located in Loudoun County, Virginia for a sale price of approximately $9.8 million. Net cash proceeds totaled approximately $9.7 million. As of June 30, 2015, we had released from escrow approximately $9.7 million of the proceeds that were being held for possible investment in a like-kind exchange in accordance with Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

On July 29, 2014, we completed the sale of our Mountain View Technology Park properties and Mountain View Research Park Building Sixteen property located in Mountain View, California for an aggregate sale price of approximately $92.1 million. Net cash proceeds totaled approximately $90.6 million. As of June 30, 2015, we had released from escrow approximately $90.2 million of the proceeds that were being held for possible investment in a like-kind exchange in accordance with Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

(3)

Capital contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures for the six months ended June 30, 2015 were primarily due to cash contributions of approximately $2.3 million, $2.2 million and $9.1 million to our North Station (Phase I—Air Rights), 1265 Main Street and Dock72 at the Brooklyn Navy Yard joint ventures, respectively.

Capital contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures for the six months ended June 30, 2014 were primarily due to cash contributions of approximately $39.0 million and approximately $5.4 million to our 1001 6th Street (formerly 501 K Street) and Annapolis Junction joint ventures, respectively.

(4)

Capital distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures increased due to a distribution made by the joint venture that owns 901 New York Avenue located in Washington, DC. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we received a distribution of approximately $24.5 million, which was generated from the excess loan proceeds from the joint venture’s refinancing of its mortgage loan to a new 10-year mortgage loan totaling $225.0 million. Our allocation of income and distributions for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was not proportionate to our nominal ownership interest as a result of the achievement of specified investment return thresholds, as provided for in the joint venture agreement.

Cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 totaled approximately $1.0 billion. This consisted primarily of the payments of regular and special dividends and distributions to our shareholders and unitholders. Future debt payments are discussed below under the heading “Capitalization—Debt Financing.”

Capitalization

At June 30, 2015, our total consolidated debt was approximately $9.9 billion. The GAAP weighted-average annual interest rate on our consolidated indebtedness was 4.41% (with a coupon/stated rate of 4.98%) and the weighted-average maturity was approximately 4.5 years.

Consolidated debt to total consolidated market capitalization ratio, defined as total consolidated debt as a percentage of the value of our outstanding equity securities plus our total consolidated debt, is a measure of leverage commonly used by analysts in the REIT sector. Our total consolidated market capitalization was approximately $30.8 billion at June 30, 2015. Our total consolidated market capitalization was calculated using the June 30, 2015 closing stock price of $121.04 per common share and the following: (1) 153,473,931 shares of our common stock, (2) 16,192,518 outstanding common units of partnership interest in our Operating Partnership (excluding common units held by us), (3) an aggregate of 1,622,595 common units issuable upon conversion of all outstanding LTIP Units, assuming all conditions have been met for the conversion of the LTIP Units, (4) 216,960 2012 OPP Units that were issued in the form of LTIP Units and earned as of February 6, 2015, (5) 80,000 shares (8,000,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share) of our 5.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, at a price of $2,500 per share ($25 per depositary share), and (6) our consolidated debt totaling approximately $9.9 billion. At June 30, 2015, our total consolidated debt, which excludes debt collateralized by our unconsolidated joint ventures, represented approximately 32.01% of our total consolidated market capitalization.

Following the consolidation of 767 Venture, LLC (the entity that owns 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building)), effective June 1, 2013, our consolidated debt increased significantly compared to prior periods even though our economic interest in 767 Venture, LLC remained substantially unchanged. As a result, we believe the presentation of total adjusted debt may provide investors with a more complete picture of our share of consolidated and unconsolidated debt. Total adjusted debt is defined as our total consolidated debt, plus our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt, minus our joint venture partners’ share of consolidated debt, and was approximately $9.1 billion at June 30, 2015. For a tabular reconciliation refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capitalization—Debt Financing” within “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” In addition, in light of the difference between our total consolidated debt and our total adjusted debt, we believe that also presenting our total adjusted debt to total adjusted market capitalization ratio may provide investors with a more complete picture of our leverage in relation to the overall size of our company. The calculation of the total adjusted debt to total adjusted market capitalization ratio is the same as consolidated debt to total consolidated market capitalization ratio except that the total adjusted debt balance is used in lieu of the total consolidated debt balance. At June 30, 2015 our total adjusted debt represented approximately 30.16% of our total adjusted market capitalization.

The calculation of total consolidated market capitalization and total adjusted market capitalization does not include 309,818 2013 MYLTIP Units, 476,320 2014 MYLTIP Units and 368,415 2015 MYLTIP Units because, unlike other LTIP Units, they are not earned until certain return thresholds are achieved. These percentages will fluctuate with changes in the market value of our common stock and do not necessarily reflect our capacity to incur additional debt to finance our activities or our ability to manage our existing debt obligations. However, for a company like ours, whose assets are primarily income-producing real estate, the total consolidated debt to total consolidated market capitalization ratio and the total adjusted debt to total adjusted market capitalization ratio may provide investors with alternate indications of leverage, so long as they are evaluated along with other financial ratios and the various components of our outstanding indebtedness.

For a discussion of our unconsolidated joint venture indebtedness, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capitalization—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements—Joint Venture Indebtedness” within “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” and for a discussion of our consolidated joint venture indebtedness see “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capitalization—Mortgage Notes Payable” and “—Mezzanine Notes Payable” within “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Debt Financing

As of June 30, 2015, we had approximately $9.9 billion of outstanding consolidated indebtedness, representing approximately 32.01% of our total consolidated market capitalization as calculated above consisting of approximately (1) $5.3 billion (net of discount) in publicly traded unsecured senior notes having a GAAP weighted-average interest rate of 4.42% per annum and maturities in 2018 through 2024; (2) $4.3 billion of property-specific mortgage debt having a GAAP weighted-average interest rate of 4.31% per annum and weighted-average term of 2.7 years and (3) $0.3 billion of mezzanine notes payable associated with 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building), having a GAAP interest rate of 5.53% per annum and maturing in 2017. The table below summarizes our mortgage and mezzanine notes payable, our Operating Partnership’s unsecured senior notes and our Operating Partnership’s Unsecured Line of Credit at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014:


	June 30,
	2015			2014
	(dollars in thousands)
Debt Summary:
Balance
Fixed rate mortgage notes payable	$	4,269,808		$	4,411,453
Unsecured senior notes, net of discount		5,288,503			5,836,729
Unsecured Line of Credit		—			—
Mezzanine notes payable		309,148			310,427

Total consolidated debt		9,867,459			10,558,609
Add:
Our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt		352,882			328,711
Deduct:
Partners’ share of consolidated mortgage notes payable		(1,044,387	)		(748,668	)
Partners’ share of consolidated mezzanine notes payable		(123,659	)		(124,171	)

Total adjusted debt	$	9,052,295		$	10,014,481


	June 30,
	2015			2014
Consolidated Debt Financing Statistics:
Percent of total debt:
Fixed rate		100.00	%		100.00	%
Variable rate		—	%		—	%

Total		100.00	%		100.00	%

GAAP Weighted-average interest rate at end of period:
Fixed rate		4.41	%		4.46	%
Variable rate		—	%		—	%

Total		4.41	%		4.46	%

Coupon/Stated Weighted-average interest rate at end of period:
Fixed rate		4.98	%		5.01	%
Variable rate		—	%		—	%

Total		4.98	%		5.01	%

Unsecured Line of Credit

Our Operating Partnership has a $1.0 billion revolving credit facility (the “Unsecured Line of Credit”) with a maturity date of July 26, 2018. The Operating Partnership may increase the total commitment to $1.5 billion, subject to syndication of the increase and other conditions. At the Operating Partnership’s option, loans

outstanding under the Unsecured Line of Credit will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to (1), in the case of loans denominated in Dollars, Euro or Sterling, LIBOR or, in the case of loans denominated in Canadian Dollars, CDOR, in each case, plus a margin ranging from 0.925% to 1.70% based on the Operating Partnership’s credit rating or (2) an alternate base rate equal to the greatest of (a) the Administrative Agent’s prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5% or (c) LIBOR for a one month period plus 1.00%, in each case, plus a margin ranging from 0.0% to 0.70% based on the Operating Partnership’s credit rating. The Unsecured Line of Credit also contains a competitive bid option that allows banks that are part of the lender consortium to bid to make loan advances to the Operating Partnership at a reduced interest rate. In addition, the Operating Partnership is also obligated to pay (1) in quarterly installments a facility fee on the total commitment at a rate per annum ranging from 0.125% to 0.35% based on the Operating Partnership’s credit rating and (2) an annual fee on the undrawn amount of each letter of credit equal to the LIBOR margin. Based on the Operating Partnership’s current credit rating, the LIBOR and CDOR margin is 1.00%, the alternate base rate margin is 0.0% and the facility fee is 0.15%. Our ability to borrow under our Operating Partnership’s Unsecured Line of Credit is subject to our compliance with a number of customary financial and other covenants on an ongoing basis, including:

•

a leverage ratio not to exceed 60%, however the leverage ratio may increase to no greater than 65% provided that it is reduced back to 60% within one year;

•

a secured debt leverage ratio not to exceed 55%;

•

a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.40;

•

an unsecured leverage ratio not to exceed 60%, however the leverage ratio may increase to no greater than 65% provided that it is reduced back to 60% within one year;

•

an unsecured debt interest coverage ratio of at least 1.75; and

•

limitations on permitted investments.

We believe we are in compliance with the financial and other covenants listed above.

As of June 30, 2015, we had no borrowings and outstanding letters of credit totaling approximately $16.5 million outstanding under the Unsecured Line of Credit, with the ability to borrow approximately $983.5 million. As of August 3, 2015, we had no borrowings and outstanding letters of credit totaling approximately $30.1 million outstanding under the Unsecured Line of Credit, with the ability to borrow approximately $969.9 million.

Unsecured Senior Notes

The following summarizes the unsecured senior notes outstanding as of June 30, 2015 (dollars in thousands):


	Coupon/ Stated Rate			Effective Rate(1)			Principal Amount			Maturity Date(2)
10 Year Unsecured Senior Notes		5.875	%		5.967	%	$	700,000		October 15, 2019
10 Year Unsecured Senior Notes		5.625	%		5.708	%		700,000		November 15, 2020
10 Year Unsecured Senior Notes		4.125	%		4.289	%		850,000		May 15, 2021
7 Year Unsecured Senior Notes		3.700	%		3.853	%		850,000		November 15, 2018
11 Year Unsecured Senior Notes		3.850	%		3.954	%		1,000,000		February 1, 2023
10.5 Year Unsecured Senior Notes		3.125	%		3.279	%		500,000		September 1, 2023
10.5 Year Unsecured Senior Notes		3.800	%		3.916	%		700,000		February 1, 2024

Total principal								5,300,000
Net unamortized discount								(11,497	)

Total							$	5,288,503

(1)	Yield on issuance date including the effects of discounts on the notes and the amortization of financing costs.

(2)	No principal amounts are due prior to maturity.

Our unsecured senior notes are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of their principal amount or (ii) the sum of the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted at a rate equal to the yield on U.S. Treasury securities with a comparable maturity plus 35 basis points (or 20 basis points in the case of the $500 million of notes that mature on September 1, 2023, 25 basis points in the case of the $700 million of notes that mature on February 1, 2024, 40 basis points in the case of the $700 million of notes that mature on October 15, 2019 and 30 basis points in the case of the $700 million and $850 million of notes that mature on November 15, 2020 and May 15, 2021, respectively), in each case plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The indenture under which our unsecured senior notes were issued contains restrictions on incurring debt and using our assets as security in other financing transactions and other customary financial and other covenants, including (1) a leverage ratio not to exceed 60%, (2) a secured debt leverage ratio not to exceed 50%, (3) an interest coverage ratio of greater than 1.50, and (4) unencumbered asset value to be no less than 150% of our unsecured debt. As of June 30, 2015, we believe we were in compliance with each of these financial restrictions and requirements.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

On February 19, 2015, we commenced a planned interest rate hedging program. We entered into eight forward-starting interest rate swap contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2015, which fix the 10-year swap rate at a weighted-average rate of approximately 2.458% per annum on notional amounts aggregating $325.0 million. These interest rate swap contracts were entered into in advance of a financing with a target commencement date in September 2016 and maturity in September 2026. We entered into the interest rate swap contracts designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to reduce our exposure to the variability in future cash flows attributable to changes in the 10-year swap rate in contemplation of obtaining 10-year fixed-rate financing in September 2016. In addition, 767 Fifth Partners LLC, which is the consolidated entity (in which we have a 60% interest and owns 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building) in New York City), entered into five forward-starting interest rate swap contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2015, which fix the 10-year swap rate at a weighted-average rate of approximately 2.793% per annum on notional amounts aggregating $150.0 million. These interest rate swap contracts were entered into in advance of a financing with a target commencement date in June 2017 and maturity in June 2027. Our 767 Fifth Partners LLC consolidated entity entered into the interest rate swap contracts designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to reduce its exposure to the variability in future cash flows attributable to changes in the 10-year swap rate in contemplation of obtaining 10-year fixed-rate financing in June 2017 (See Notes 5 and 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Mortgage Notes Payable

The following represents the outstanding principal balances due under the mortgage notes payable at June 30, 2015:


Properties	Stated Interest Rate			GAAP Interest Rate(1)			Stated Principal Amount		Historical Fair Value Adjustment		Carrying Amount		Carrying Amount (partners’ share)			Maturity Date
	(dollars in thousands)
Wholly-owned
599 Lexington Avenue		5.57	%		5.41	%	$	750,000	$	—	$	750,000		N/A	(2)(3)	March 1, 2017
200 Clarendon Street (formerly the John Hancock Tower)		5.68	%		5.05	%		640,500		6,623		647,123		N/A	(2)(4)	January 6, 2017
Embarcadero Center Four		6.10	%		7.02	%		351,827		—		351,827		N/A	(5)	December 1, 2016
New Dominion Tech Park, Bldg. One		7.69	%		7.84	%		39,757		—		39,757		N/A		January 15, 2021
Kingstowne Two and Retail		5.99	%		5.61	%		30,267		69		30,336		N/A		January 1, 2016
University Place		6.94	%		6.99	%		11,552		—		11,552		N/A		August 1, 2021

							$	1,823,903	$	6,692	$	1,830,595		N/A
Consolidated Joint Ventures
767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building)		5.95	%		2.44	%		1,300,000		99,665		1,399,665		559,866	(2)(6)(7)	October 7, 2017
601 Lexington Avenue		4.75	%		4.79	%		705,067		—		705,067		317,280	(8)	April 10, 2022
Fountain Square		5.71	%		2.56	%		211,250		5,587		216,837		108,419	(2)(9)(10)	October 11, 2016
505 9th Street		5.73	%		5.87	%		117,644		—		117,644		58,822	(9)	November 1, 2017

							$	2,333,961	$	105,252	$	2,439,213	$	1,044,387

Total							$	4,157,864	$	111,944	$	4,269,808	$	1,044,387

(1)

GAAP interest rate differs from the stated interest rate due to the inclusion of the amortization of financing charges, effects of hedging transactions and adjustments required to reflect loans at their fair values upon acquisition or consolidation. All adjustments to reflect loans at their fair value upon acquisition or consolidation are noted above.

(2)	The mortgage loan requires interest only payments with a balloon payment due at maturity.

(3)

On December 19, 2006, we terminated the forward-starting interest rate swap contracts related to this financing and received approximately $10.9 million, which amount is reducing our GAAP interest expense for this mortgage over the term of the financing, resulting in an effective interest rate of 5.41% per annum for the financing. The stated interest rate is 5.57% per annum.

(4)	In connection with the mortgage financing we have agreed to guarantee approximately $25.3 million related to our obligation to provide funds for certain tenant re-leasing costs.

(5)

Under a previous interest rate hedging program, we are reclassifying into earnings over the eight-year term of the loan as an increase in interest expense approximately $26.4 million (approximately $3.3 million per year) of the amounts recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets within Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) resulting in an effective interest rate of 7.02% per annum.

(6)	This property is owned by a consolidated entity in which we have a 60% interest.

(7)

In connection with the assumption of the loan, we guaranteed the joint venture’s obligation to fund various escrows, including tenant improvements, taxes and insurance in lieu of cash deposits. As of June 30, 2015, the maximum funding obligation under the guarantee was approximately $29.5 million. We earn a fee from the joint venture for providing the guarantee and have an agreement with our partners to reimburse the joint venture for their share of any payments made under the guarantee.

(8)	This property is owned by a consolidated entity in which we have a 55% interest.

(9)	This property is owned by a consolidated entity in which we have a 50% interest (See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(10)	In connection with the mortgage financing we have agreed to guarantee approximately $0.7 million related to our obligation to provide funds for certain tenant re-leasing costs.

Mezzanine Notes Payable

The following represents the outstanding principal balances due under the mezzanine notes payable at June 30, 2015:


Property Debt is Associated With	Stated Interest Rate			GAAP Interest Rate(1)			Stated Principal Amount		Historical Fair Value Adjustment		Carrying Amount		Carrying Amount (partners’ share)			Maturity Date
	(dollars in thousands)
767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building)		6.02	%		5.53	%	$	306,000	$	3,148	$	309,148	$	123,659	(2)(3)		October 7, 2017

(1)	GAAP interest rate differs from the stated interest rate due to adjustments required to reflect loans at their fair values upon acquisition or consolidation. The adjustment to reflect the loan at its fair value upon consolidation is noted above.

(2)	This property is owned by a consolidated joint venture in which we have a 60% interest.

(3)	The mortgage loan requires interest only payments with a balloon payment due at maturity.

Outside Members’ Notes Payable

In conjunction with the consolidation of 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building), we recorded loans payable to the joint venture’s partners totaling $450.0 million and related accrued interest payable totaling approximately $175.8 million. The partner loans bear interest at a fixed rate of 11.0% per annum and mature on June 9, 2017. We have eliminated in consolidation our partner loan totaling $270.0 million and our share of the related accrued interest payable of approximately $155.4 million at June 30, 2015. The remaining notes payable to the outside joint venture partners and related accrued interest payable totaling $180.0 million and approximately $103.6 million as of June 30, 2015 have been reflected as Outside Members’ Notes Payable and within Accrued Interest Payable, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The related interest expense from the Outside Members’ Notes Payable totaling approximately $7.6 million and $15.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 is fully allocated to the outside joint venture partners as an adjustment to Noncontrolling Interests in Property Partnerships in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements—Joint Venture Indebtedness

We have investments in unconsolidated joint ventures with our effective ownership interests ranging from 25% to 60%. Six of these ventures have mortgage indebtedness. We exercise significant influence over, but do not control, these entities and therefore they are presently accounted for using the equity method of accounting. See also Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. At June 30, 2015, the aggregate carrying amount of debt, including both our and our partners’ share, incurred by these ventures was approximately $832.9 million (of which our proportionate share is approximately $352.9 million). The table below summarizes the outstanding debt of these joint venture properties at June 30, 2015. In addition to other guarantees specifically noted in the table, we have agreed to customary environmental indemnifications and nonrecourse carve-outs (e.g., guarantees against fraud, misrepresentation and bankruptcy) on certain of the loans.


Properties	Venture Ownership %			Stated Interest Rate			GAAP Interest Rate(1)			Carrying Amount		Carrying Amount (Our Share)			Maturity Date
	(dollars in thousands)
540 Madison Avenue		60	%		1.68	%		1.85	%	$	120,000	$	72,000	(2)(3)	June 5, 2018
Metropolitan Square		51	%		5.75	%		5.81	%		170,160		86,781		May 5, 2020
Market Square North		50	%		4.85	%		4.91	%		126,662		63,331		October 1, 2020
Annapolis Junction Building One		50	%		1.93	%		2.10	%		40,434		20,217	(4)	March 31, 2018
Annapolis Junction Building Six		50	%		2.44	%		2.58	%		13,539		6,770	(2)(5)	November 17, 2015
Annapolis Junction Building Seven		50	%		1.83	%		2.39	%		18,289		9,145	(2)(6)	April 4, 2016
Annapolis Junction Building Eight		50	%		1.68	%		2.12	%		13,776		6,888	(2)(7)	June 23, 2017
500 North Capitol Street		30	%		4.15	%		4.19	%		105,000		31,500	(2)	June 6, 2023
901 New York Avenue		25	%		3.61	%		3.68	%		225,000		56,250		January 5, 2025

Total										$	832,860	$	352,882

(1)	GAAP interest rate differs from the stated interest rate due to the inclusion of the amortization of financing charges.

(2)	The loan requires interest only payments with a balloon payment due at maturity.

(3)	Mortgage loan bears interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.50% per annum.

(4)	Mortgage loan bears interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.75% per annum and matures on March 31, 2018 with one, three-year extension option, subject to certain conditions.

(5)	The construction financing bears interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum.

(6)	The construction financing bears interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.65% per annum and matures on April 4, 2016 with two, one-year extension options, subject to certain conditions.

(7)	The construction financing bears interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.50% per annum and matures on June 23, 2017 with two, one-year extension options, subject to certain conditions.

State and Local Tax Matters

Because we are organized and qualify as a REIT, we are generally not subject to federal income taxes, but subject to certain state and local taxes. In the normal course of business, certain entities through which we own real estate either have undergone, or are currently undergoing, tax audits or other inquiries. Although we believe that we have substantial arguments in favor of our positions in the ongoing audits, in some instances there is no controlling precedent or interpretive guidance on the specific point at issue. Collectively, tax deficiency notices received to date from the jurisdictions conducting the ongoing audits have not been material. However, there can be no assurance that future audits will not occur with increased frequency or that the ultimate result of such audits will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Insurance

We carry insurance coverage on our properties of types and in amounts and with deductibles that we believe are in line with coverage customarily obtained by owners of similar properties. In response to the uncertainty in the insurance market following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Federal Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (as amended, “TRIA”) was enacted in November 2002 to require regulated insurers to make available coverage for “certified” acts of terrorism (as defined by the statute). The expiration date of TRIA was extended to December 31, 2014 by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 and further extended to December 31, 2020 by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 (“TRIPRA”), and we can provide no assurance that it will be extended further. Currently, the per occurrence limits of our portfolio property insurance program are $1.0 billion, including coverage for acts of terrorism other than nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological terrorism (“Terrorism Coverage”). We also carry $250 million of Terrorism Coverage for 601 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York (“601 Lexington Avenue”) in excess of the $1.0 billion of Terrorism Coverage in our property insurance program. Certain properties, including the General Motors Building located at 767 Fifth Avenue in New York, New York (“767 Fifth Avenue”), are currently insured in separate insurance programs. The property insurance program per occurrence limits for 767 Fifth Avenue are $1.625 billion, including Terrorism Coverage. We also currently carry nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological terrorism insurance coverage for acts of terrorism certified under TRIA (“NBCR Coverage”), which is provided by IXP, as a direct insurer, for the properties in our portfolio, including 767 Fifth Avenue, but excluding certain other properties owned in joint ventures with third parties or which we manage. The per occurrence limit for NBCR Coverage is $1 billion. Under TRIA, after the payment of the required deductible and coinsurance, the NBCR Coverage provided by IXP is backstopped by the Federal Government if the aggregate industry insured losses resulting from a certified act of terrorism exceed a “program trigger.” In 2015, the program trigger is $100.0 million and the coinsurance is 15%, however both will increase in subsequent years pursuant to TRIPRA. If the Federal Government pays out for a loss under TRIA, it is mandatory that the Federal Government recoup the full amount of the loss from insurers offering TRIA coverage after the payment of the loss pursuant to a formula in TRIPRA. We may elect to terminate the NBCR Coverage if the Federal Government seeks recoupment for losses paid under TRIA, if there is a change in our portfolio or for any other reason. We intend to continue to monitor the scope, nature and cost of available terrorism insurance and maintain terrorism insurance in amounts and on terms that are commercially reasonable.

We also currently carry earthquake insurance on our properties located in areas known to be subject to earthquakes in an amount and subject to self-insurance that we believe is commercially reasonable. In addition, this insurance is subject to a deductible in the amount of 5% of the value of the affected property. Specifically, we currently carry earthquake insurance which covers our San Francisco region (excluding Salesforce Tower) with a $170 million per occurrence limit (increased on March 1, 2015 from $120 million) and a $170 million annual aggregate limit (increased on March 1, 2015 from $120 million), $20 million of which is provided by IXP, as a direct insurer. The builders risk policy maintained for the development of Salesforce Tower in San Francisco includes a $60 million per occurrence and annual aggregate limit of earthquake coverage. The amount of our earthquake insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover losses from earthquakes. In addition, the amount of earthquake coverage could impact our ability to finance properties subject to earthquake risk. We may discontinue earthquake insurance or change the structure of our earthquake insurance program on some or all of our properties in the future if the premiums exceed our estimation of the value of the coverage.

IXP, a captive insurance company which is a wholly-owned subsidiary, acts as a direct insurer with respect to a portion of our earthquake insurance coverage for our Greater San Francisco properties and our NBCR Coverage. Insofar as we own IXP, we are responsible for its liquidity and capital resources, and the accounts of IXP are part of our consolidated financial statements. In particular, if a loss occurs which is covered by our NBCR Coverage but is less than the applicable program trigger under TRIA, IXP would be responsible for the full amount of the loss without any backstop by the Federal Government. IXP would also be responsible for any recoupment charges by the Federal Government in the event losses are paid out and its insurance policy is maintained after the payout by the Federal Government. If we experience a loss and IXP is required to pay under its insurance policy, we would ultimately record the loss to the extent of the required payment. Therefore,

insurance coverage provided by IXP should not be considered as the equivalent of third-party insurance, but rather as a modified form of self-insurance. In addition, our Operating Partnership has issued a guarantee to cover liabilities of IXP in the amount of $20.0 million.

The mortgages on our properties typically contain requirements concerning the financial ratings of the insurers who provide policies covering the property. We provide the lenders on a regular basis with the identity of the insurance companies in our insurance programs. The ratings of some of our insurers are below the rating requirements in some of our loan agreements and the lenders for these loans could attempt to claim an event of default has occurred under the loan. We believe we could obtain insurance with insurers which satisfy the rating requirements. Additionally, in the future our ability to obtain debt financing secured by individual properties, or the terms of such financing, may be adversely affected if lenders generally insist on ratings for insurers or amounts of insurance which are difficult to obtain or which result in a commercially unreasonable premium. There can be no assurance that a deficiency in the financial ratings of one or more of our insurers will not have a material adverse effect on us.

We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market in general, and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism and California earthquake risk in particular, but we cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in future policy years. There are other types of losses, such as from wars, for which we cannot obtain insurance at all or at a reasonable cost. With respect to such losses and losses from acts of terrorism, earthquakes or other catastrophic events, if we experience a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties, as well as the anticipated future revenues from those properties. Depending on the specific circumstances of each affected property, it is possible that we could be liable for mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the property. Any such loss could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition and results of operations.

Funds from Operations

Pursuant to the revised definition of Funds from Operations adopted by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, we calculate Funds from Operations, or “FFO,” by adjusting net income (loss) attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders (computed in accordance with GAAP, including non-recurring items) for gains (or losses) from sales of properties, impairment losses on depreciable real estate of consolidated real estate, impairment losses on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures driven by a measurable decrease in the fair value of depreciable real estate held by the unconsolidated joint ventures, real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustment for unconsolidated partnerships, joint ventures and preferred distributions. FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure. The use of FFO, combined with the required primary GAAP presentations, has been fundamentally beneficial in improving the understanding of operating results of REITs among the investing public and making comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful. Management generally considers FFO to be a useful measure for reviewing our comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains and losses related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets, impairment losses on depreciable real estate of consolidated real estate, impairment losses on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures driven by a measurable decrease in the fair value of depreciable real estate held by the unconsolidated joint ventures and excluding real estate asset depreciation and amortization (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies. Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently.

FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP and is not a measure of liquidity or an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions. We believe that to further understand our

performance, FFO should be compared with our reported net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders and considered in addition to cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders to FFO for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:


	Three months ended June 30,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	79,460		$	76,527
Add:
Preferred dividends		2,618			2,618
Noncontrolling interest—common units of the Operating Partnership		9,394			8,883
Noncontrolling interest—redeemable preferred units of the Operating Partnership		3			320
Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships		9,264			7,553

Income from continuing operations		100,739			95,901
Add:
Real estate depreciation and amortization(1)		171,384			159,272
Less:
Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships’ share of funds from operations		36,699			21,825
Noncontrolling interest—redeemable preferred units of the Operating Partnership		3			320
Preferred dividends		2,618			2,618

Funds from Operations (FFO) attributable to the Operating Partnership common unitholders (including Boston Properties, Inc.)	$	232,803		$	230,410
Less:
Noncontrolling interest—common units of the Operating Partnership’s share of funds from operations		24,072			23,400

Funds from Operations (FFO) attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders	$	208,731		$	207,010

Boston Properties, Inc.’s percentage share of Funds from Operations—basic		89.66	%		89.84	%
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic		153,450			153,078

(1)

Real estate depreciation and amortization consists of depreciation and amortization from the Consolidated Statements of Operations of $167,844 and $154,628, our share of unconsolidated joint venture real estate depreciation and amortization of $3,886 and $4,986, less corporate related depreciation and amortization of $346 and $342 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Reconciliation to Diluted Funds from Operations:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2015				Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)		Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)
	(in thousands)
Basic FFO	$	232,803		171,146	$	230,410		170,382
Effect of Dilutive Securities
Convertible Preferred Units		—		—		230		385
Stock Based Compensation		—		365		—		160

Diluted FFO	$	232,803		171,511	$	230,640		170,927
Less:
Noncontrolling interest—common units of the Operating Partnership’s share of diluted FFO		24,021		17,696		23,349		17,304

Boston Properties, Inc.’s share of Diluted FFO(1)	$	208,782		153,815	$	207,291		153,623

(1)	Our share of diluted Funds from Operations was 89.68% and 89.88% for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Contractual Obligations

We have various service contracts with vendors related to our property management. In addition, we have certain other contracts we enter into in the ordinary course of business that may extend beyond one year. These contracts include terms that provide for cancellation with insignificant or no cancellation penalties. Contract terms are generally between three and five years.

During the second quarter of 2015, we paid approximately $39.9 million to fund tenant-related obligations, including tenant improvements and leasing commissions, and incurred approximately $66.1 million of new tenant-related obligations associated with approximately 900,000 square feet of second generation leases, or approximately $73 per square foot. In addition, we signed leases for approximately 124,000 square feet at our development properties. The tenant-related obligations for the development properties are included within the projects’ “Estimated Total Investment” referred to in “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” In the aggregate, during the second quarter of 2015, we signed leases for approximately 1,024,000 square feet of space and incurred aggregate tenant-related obligations of approximately $82.0 million, or approximately $80 per square foot.

ITEM 3—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

As of June 30, 2015, approximately $9.9 billion of our consolidated borrowings bore interest at fixed rates and none of our consolidated borrowings bore interest at variable rates. The fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in market interest rates. The table below does not include our unconsolidated joint venture debt. For a discussion concerning our unconsolidated joint venture debt, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Capitalization—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements—Joint Venture Indebtedness.”


	2015			2016			2017			2018			2019			2020+			Total			Estimated Fair Value
	(dollars in thousands) Mortgage debt
Fixed Rate	$	40,395		$	659,511		$	2,855,942		$	18,633		$	19,670		$	675,657		$	4,269,808		$	4,401,756
Average Interest Rate		5.87	%		5.33	%		3.93	%		5.52	%		5.53	%		4.93	%		4.31	%
Variable Rate		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

	Mezzanine debt
Fixed Rate	$	666		$	1,389		$	307,093		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	309,148		$	306,130
Average Interest Rate		—			—			5.53	%		—			—			—			5.53	%
Variable Rate		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

	Unsecured debt
Fixed Rate	$	(845	)	$	(1,681	)	$	(1,749	)	$	848,226		$	698,447		$	3,746,105		$	5,288,503		$	5,602,523
Average Interest Rate		—			—			—			3.85	%		5.97	%		4.26	%		4.42	%
Variable Rate		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

Total Debt	$	40,216		$	659,219		$	3,161,286		$	866,859		$	718,117		$	4,421,762		$	9,867,459		$	10,310,409

At June 30, 2015, the weighted-average coupon/stated rates on our fixed rate debt was 4.98% per annum. The weighted-average coupon/stated rates for our unsecured debt was 4.34% per annum.

At June 30, 2015, we had no outstanding variable rate debt.

The fair value amounts were determined solely by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. Due to the uncertainty of specific actions we may undertake to minimize possible effects of market interest rate increases, this analysis assumes no changes in our financial structure.

On February 19, 2015, we commenced a planned interest rate hedging program. We entered into eight forward-starting interest rate swap contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2015, which fix the 10-year swap rate at a weighted-average rate of approximately 2.458% per annum on notional amounts aggregating $325.0 million. These interest rate swap contracts were entered into in advance of a financing with a target commencement date in September 2016 and maturity in September 2026. In addition, 767 Fifth Partners LLC, which is the consolidated entity (in which we have a 60% interest and owns 767 Fifth Avenue (the General Motors Building), in New York City) entered into five forward-starting interest rate swap contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2015, which fix the 10-year swap rate at a weighted-average rate of approximately 2.793% per annum on notional amounts aggregating $150.0 million. These interest rate swap contracts were entered into in advance of a financing with a target commencement date in June 2017 and maturity in June 2027. We entered into the interest rate swap contracts designated and qualifying as a cash flow hedges to reduce our exposure to the variability in future cash flows attributable to changes in the 10-year swap rate in contemplation of obtaining 10-year fixed-rate financing in September 2016. Our 767 Fifth Partners LLC consolidated entity entered into the interest rate swap contracts designated and qualifying as a cash flow hedges to reduce its exposure to the variability in future cash flows attributable to changes in the 10-year swap rate in contemplation of obtaining 10-year fixed-rate financing in June 2017 (See Notes 5 and 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Our usage of derivative instruments also involves certain additional risks such as counter party credit risk, the enforceability of hedging contracts and the risk that unanticipated and significant changes in interest rates will cause a significant loss of basis in the contract. We believe that there is a low likelihood that these counterparties will fail to meet our obligations and we minimize our exposure by limiting counterparties to major banks who meet established credit and capital guidelines. There can be no assurance that we will adequately protect against the foregoing risks.

ITEM 4—Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the second quarter of our fiscal year ending December 31, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1—Legal Proceedings.

We are subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance. Management believes that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

ITEM 1A—Risk Factors.

Except to the extent updated below or previously updated or to the extent additional factual information disclosed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates to such risk factors (including, without limitation, the matters discussed in Part I, “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”), there were no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

ITEM 2—Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a)

During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we issued an aggregate of 63,101 common shares in exchange for 63,101 common units of limited partnership held by certain limited partners of BPLP. Of these shares, 50,816 shares were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We relied on the exemption under Section 4(2) based upon factual representations received from the limited partners who received the common shares.

(b)

Not applicable.

(c)

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. None.

ITEM 3—Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

ITEM 4—Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

ITEM 5—Other Information.

(a) None.

(b) None.

ITEM 6—Exhibits.

(a) Exhibits



12.1	—	Calculation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Calculation of Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends.

31.1	—	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2	—	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1	—	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2	—	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

101	—	The following materials from Boston Properties, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) related notes to these financial statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.

August 7, 2015		/s/ MICHAEL E. LABELLE
		Michael E. LaBelle
		Chief Financial Officer
		(duly authorized officer and
		principal financial officer)