Annual Statements Open main menu

Brixmor Property Group Inc. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from_____ to_____
Commission File Number: 001-36160 (Brixmor Property Group Inc.)
Commission File Number: 333-201464-01 (Brixmor Operating Partnership LP)
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland (Brixmor Property Group Inc.)
 
45-2433192
Delaware (Brixmor Operating Partnership LP)
 
80-0831163
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
212-869-3000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share.
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Brixmor Property Group Inc. Yes þ No Brixmor Operating Partnership LP Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Brixmor Property Group Inc. Yes No þ Brixmor Operating Partnership LP Yes No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Brixmor Property Group Inc. Yes þ No Brixmor Operating Partnership LP Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Brixmor Property Group Inc. Yes þ No Brixmor Operating Partnership LP Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
 
 
Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
Large accelerated filer
þ
Non-accelerated filer
 
 
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
þ
Smaller reporting company
Accelerated filer
 
 
Smaller reporting company
Accelerated filer
Emerging growth company
 
 
 
 
Emerging growth company
 
 
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Brixmor Property Group Inc. Yes No þ Brixmor Operating Partnership LP Yes No þ
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants’ most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
Brixmor Property Group Inc. $5,429,779,394 Brixmor Operating Partnership LP N/A
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of February 1, 2018, Brixmor Property Group Inc. had 304,704,046 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive proxy statement to be filed by Brixmor Property Group Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A relating to the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 8, 2018 will be incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K in response to Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III. The definitive proxy statement will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.




EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2017 of Brixmor Property Group Inc. and Brixmor Operating Partnership LP. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to the “Parent Company” or “BPG” mean Brixmor Property Group Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries; and references to the “Operating Partnership” mean Brixmor Operating Partnership LP and its consolidated subsidiaries. The terms the “Company,” “Brixmor,” “we,” “our” and “us” mean the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, collectively.

The Parent Company is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that owns 100% of the common stock of BPG Subsidiary Inc. (“BPG Sub”), which, in turn, is the sole owner of Brixmor OP GP LLC, or the General Partner, the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2017, the Parent Company beneficially owned, through its direct and indirect interest in BPG Sub and the General Partner, 100% of the outstanding partnership common units of interest (the “OP Units”) in the Operating Partnership.

The Company believes combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership into this single report provides the following benefits:

Enhances investors’ understanding of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
Eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation; and
Creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

Management operates the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership as one business. The management of the Parent Company consists of the same individuals as the management of the Operating Partnership. These individuals are officers of both the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership.

We believe it is important to understand the few differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership in the context of how the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership operate as a consolidated company. The Parent Company is a REIT, whose only material asset is its indirect interest in the Operating Partnership. As a result, the Parent Company does not conduct business itself other than issuing public equity from time to time. The Parent Company does not incur any material indebtedness. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of our assets. Except for net proceeds from public equity issuances by the Parent Company, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units, the Operating Partnership generates all remaining capital required by the Company’s business. Sources of this capital include the Operating Partnership’s operations, its direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness, and the issuance of OP Units.

Stockholders’ equity, partners’ capital, and non-controlling interests are the primary areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of the Parent Company and those of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership’s capital currently includes OP Units owned by the Parent Company through BPG Sub and the General Partner and has in the past and may in the future include OP Units owned by third parties. OP Units owned by third parties, if any, are accounted for in partners’ capital in the Operating Partnership’s financial statements and outside of stockholders’ equity in non-controlling interests in the Parent Company’s financial statements.

In order to highlight the differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, there are sections in this report that separately discuss the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, including separate financial statements (but combined footnotes), separate controls and procedures sections, separate certification of periodic report under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and separate certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In the sections that combine disclosure for the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of the Company.

The Parent Company consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes, and the Parent Company does not have material assets other than its indirect investment in the Operating Partnership. Therefore, while stockholders’ equity, partners’ capital and non-controlling interests may differ as discussed above, the assets and liabilities of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are materially the same on their respective financial statements.

i



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item No.
 
Page
Part I
1.
Business
1A.
Risk Factors
1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
2.
Properties
3.
Legal Proceedings
4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Part II
5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
6.
Selected Financial Data
7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
9
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
9A.
Controls and Procedures
9B
Other Information
Part III
10.
Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
11.
Executive Compensation
12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Part IV
15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
16.
Form 10-K Summary




ii




Forward-Looking Statements


This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, our operations and financial performance. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “outlook,” “believes,” “expects,” “potential,” “continues,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “predicts,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “targets” or the negative version of these words or other comparable words. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe these factors include but are not limited to those described under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this report, as such factors may be updated from time to time in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), which are accessible on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. These factors include (1) changes in national, regional or local economic climates; (2) local market conditions, including an oversupply of space in, or a reduction in demand for, properties similar to those in our Portfolio; (3) changes in market rental rates; (4) changes in the regional demographics of our properties; (5) competition from other available properties and the attractiveness of properties in our Portfolio to our tenants; (6) the financial stability of tenants, including the ability of tenants to pay rent and expense reimbursements; (7) in the case of percentage rents, the sales volume of our tenants; and (8) litigation and governmental investigations discussed under the heading “Legal Matters” in Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements in this report. These factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this report and in our other periodic filings. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except to the extent otherwise required by law.





iii



PART I

Item 1.     Business
Brixmor Property Group Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, “BPG”) is an internally-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Brixmor Operating Partnership LP and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Operating Partnership”) is the entity through which BPG conducts substantially all of its operations and owns substantially all of its assets. BPG owns 100% of the common stock of BPG Subsidiary Inc. (“BPG Sub”), which, in turn, is the sole member of Brixmor OP GP LLC (the “General Partner”), the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. Unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us,” and “our” as used herein refer to each of BPG and the Operating Partnership, collectively. We believe we own and operate one of the largest open air retail portfolios by gross leasable area (“GLA”) in the United States, comprised primarily of community and neighborhood shopping centers. As of December 31, 2017, our portfolio consisted of 486 shopping centers (the “Portfolio”) with approximately 83 million square feet of GLA. In addition, we have one land parcel currently under development. Our high quality national Portfolio is primarily located within established trade areas in the top 50 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (“MSAs”), and our shopping centers are primarily anchored by non-discretionary and value-oriented retailers, as well as consumer-oriented service providers. Our three largest tenants by annualized base rent are The TJX Companies, Inc., The Kroger Co., and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

As of December 31, 2017, BPG beneficially owned, through its direct and indirect interest in BPG Sub and the General Partner, 100% of the outstanding partnership common units of interest (the “OP Units”) in the Operating Partnership. The number of OP Units in the Operating Partnership beneficially owned by BPG is equivalent to the number of outstanding shares of BPG’s common stock, and the entitlement of all OP Units to quarterly distributions and payments in liquidation is substantially the same as those of BPG’s common stockholders. BPG’s common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “BRX.”

Because the Operating Partnership is managed by BPG, and BPG conducts substantially all of its operations through the Operating Partnership. BPG’s executive officers are the Operating Partnership’s executive officers, and although, as a partnership, the Operating Partnership does not have a board of directors, we refer to BPG’s board of directors as the Operating Partnership’s board of directors.

Our Shopping Centers
The following table provides summary information regarding our Portfolio as of December 31, 2017.
Number of shopping centers
486
GLA (square feet)
82.8 million
Leased Occupancy
92%
Billed Occupancy
90%
Average annualized base rent (“ABR”) PSF(1)
$13.47
Average Total Rent Spread(2)
12.6%
Average New and Renewal Rent Spread(2)
15.5%
Average New Rent Spread(2)
34.1%
Percent grocery-anchored shopping centers(3)
69%
Percent of ABR in top 50 U.S. MSAs
65%
Average effective age(4)
24 years
(1)     ABR PSF is calculated as ABR divided by leased GLA, excluding the GLA of lessee owned leasehold improvements.
(2)    Based on comparable leases only.
(3)
Based on number of shopping centers.
(4) 
Effective age is calculated based on the year of the most recent redevelopment of the shopping center or based on year built if no redevelopment has occurred.

Business Objectives and Strategies
Our primary objective is to maximize total returns to our stockholders through consistent, sustainable growth in cash flow. We seek to achieve this objective through proactive management and accretive reinvestment in our existing Portfolio of high-quality open air shopping centers and through disciplined capital recycling activity focused on

1



maximizing asset value and achieving critical mass in attractive retail submarkets. Our key strategies to achieve growth in cash flow include:

Driving internal growth
Pursuing value-enhancing reinvestment opportunities
Prudently executing on acquisition and disposition activity
Maintaining a flexible capital structure positioned for growth

Driving Internal Growth. Our primary drivers of internal growth include (i) below market rents which may be reset to market as leases expire, (ii) occupancy growth, and (iii) embedded contractual rent bumps.  These drivers are supported by strong leasing productivity, which also enables us to improve the credit of our tenancy and the vibrancy and relevance of our Portfolio to retailers and consumers. During 2017, we executed 618 new leases representing approximately 3.2 million square feet and 1,894 total leases representing approximately 11.9 million square feet.

We believe that there is a significant rent mark-to-market opportunity across our portfolio, and we believe that our below market rent profile and resulting low occupancy cost provide us with key competitive advantages in attracting and retaining tenants.  During 2017, we achieved new lease rent spreads of 34.1% and blended new and renewal rent spreads of 15.5% excluding options or 12.6% including options. Looking forward, the weighted average expiring ABR PSF of lease expirations through 2020 is $12.29 compared to an average ABR PSF of $15.44 for new and renewal leases signed during 2017, excluding option exercises.  In addition, 4.3 million square feet of leases for spaces 10,000 square feet or greater expire through 2020, with no remaining options, at an average expiring ABR PSF of $8.61 compared to an average ABR PSF of $12.47 for new leases signed for such spaces in 2017.

We believe there is opportunity for occupancy gains in our Portfolio, especially for spaces below 10,000 square feet as such space will benefit from our continued efforts to improve the quality of our anchor tenancy.  For spaces below 10,000 square feet, leased occupancy was 84.5% at December 31, 2017 and our total leased occupancy was 92.2%, reflecting the impact of retailer bankruptcies experienced during 2017, as well as an increased pipeline of future reinvestment activity.

Over the past two years, we have heightened our focus on achieving higher contractual rent increases over the term of our new and renewal leases, providing for enhanced embedded contractual rent growth across our portfolio. During 2017, our executed new leases reflected an average in-place contractual rent increase over the lease term of 2.1% as compared to 1.7% in 2015.  Additionally, 95% of the executed new leases during 2017 had embedded contractual rent growth provisions, compared with only 78% of the executed new leases during 2015.

Pursuing value-enhancing reinvestment opportunities.  We believe that significant opportunity exists to achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns by investing incremental capital in the repositioning and/or redevelopment of certain assets in our Portfolio. During 2017, we completed 26 repositioning, redevelopment and outparcel development projects, with an average incremental net operating income (“NOI”) yield of approximately 12% and an aggregate cost of approximately $89.6 million. As of December 31, 2017, we had 47 projects in process at an expected average incremental NOI yield of approximately 9% and an aggregate cost of $294.9 million. In addition, we have identified a pipeline of future redevelopment projects aggregating approximately $1.0 billion of potential capital reinvestment and over the next several years we expect to accelerate the pace of reinvestment activity at expected NOI yields that are generally consistent with those which we have recently realized.

Prudently executing on acquisition and disposition activity. We intend to actively pursue acquisition and disposition activity in order to enhance concentrations in attractive retail submarkets and optimize the quality and long-term growth rate of our Portfolio. During 2017, we disposed of $330.8 million of properties, redeploying $190.5 million into acquisitions in markets where we already have a geographic presence. In general, our disposition strategy focuses on selling assets where we believe value has been maximized, where there is future downside risk to cash flow, or where we have limited ability or desire to build critical mass in the submarket, while our acquisition strategy focuses on buying assets with strong growth potential that are located in our existing markets and may allow us to more effectively leverage our operational platform and expertise. Acquisition activity may include acquisitions of other open-air shopping centers, non-owned anchor spaces, and retail buildings and/or outparcels at, or adjacent to, our shopping centers in addition to acquisitions of our common stock, pursuant to a $400.0 million share repurchase authorization announced during 2017.

2



Maintaining a Flexible Capital Structure Positioned for Growth. We believe our current capital structure provides us with the financial flexibility and capacity to fund our current capital needs as well as future growth opportunities. We have access to multiple forms of capital, including secured property level debt, unsecured corporate level debt, preferred equity, and common equity, which will allow us to efficiently execute on our strategic and operational objectives. We currently have investment grade credit ratings from all three major credit rating agencies. As of December 31, 2017, our revolving credit facility was undrawn, providing $1.25 billion of liquidity. We intend to continue to enhance our financial and operational flexibility through laddering and extending the duration of our debt, and further expanding our unencumbered asset base.

The strategies discussed above are periodically reviewed by our Board of Directors and while it does not have any present intention to amend or revise its strategies, the Board of Directors may do so at any time without a vote of the Company’s shareholders.
Competition
We face considerable competition in the leasing of real estate, which is a highly competitive market. We compete with a number of other companies in leasing space to prospective tenants and in re-leasing space to current tenants upon expiration of their respective leases. We believe that the principal competitive factors in attracting tenants include the quality of the location, co-tenants, physical conditions and the cost of occupancy of our shopping centers. In this regard, we proactively manage and, where and when appropriate, reinvest in and upgrade our shopping centers, with an emphasis on maintaining high occupancy rates with a strong base of nationally and regionally recognized anchor tenants that generate substantial daily traffic. In addition, we believe that the breadth of our national portfolio of shopping centers, the local market knowledge derived from our regional operating teams and the close relationships we have established with certain major national and regional retailers, allow us to maintain a strong competitive position.
Environmental Exposure
We are subject to federal, state and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operations conducted on real property. For further information regarding our risks related to environmental exposure see “Environmental conditions that exist at some of the properties in our Portfolio could result in significant unexpected costs” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors”.
Employees
As of December 31, 2017, we had 464 employees.
Financial Information about Industry Segments
Our principal business is the ownership and operation of community and neighborhood shopping centers. We do not distinguish or group our operations on a geographical basis when measuring performance. Accordingly, we have a single reportable segment for disclosure purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). In the opinion of our management, no material part of our and our subsidiaries’ business is dependent upon a single tenant, the loss of any one of which would have a material adverse effect on us, and during 2017 no single tenant or single shopping center accounted for 5% or more of our consolidated revenues.
REIT Qualification
We made a tax election to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2011 and expect to continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT. So long as we qualify as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on net taxable income that we distribute annually to our stockholders. In order to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the real estate qualification of sources of our income, the composition and values of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the diversity of ownership of our stock. In order to comply with REIT requirements, we may need to forego otherwise attractive opportunities and limit our expansion opportunities and the manner in which we conduct our operations. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to our REIT Status and Certain Other Tax Items.”


3



Corporate Headquarters
Brixmor Property Group Inc., a Maryland corporation, was incorporated in Delaware on May 27, 2011, changed its name to Brixmor Property Group Inc. on June 17, 2013 and changed its jurisdiction of incorporation to Maryland on November 4, 2013. The Operating Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, was formed on May 23, 2011. Our principal executive offices are located at 450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017, and our telephone number is (212) 869-3000.
Our website address is http://www.brixmor.com. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference herein and is not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make available free of charge on our website or provide a link on our website to our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. We also make available through our website other reports filed with or furnished to the SEC under the Exchange Act, including our proxy statements and reports filed by officers and directors under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. To access these filings, go to the “Financial Information” portion of our “Investors” page on our website, and then click on “SEC Filings.” You may also read and copy any document we file at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. In addition, these reports and the other documents we file with the SEC are available at a website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
From time to time, we may use our website as a channel of distribution of material information. Financial and other material information regarding our company is routinely posted on and accessible at http://www.brixmor.com. In addition, you may automatically receive e-mail alerts and other information about our company by enrolling your e-mail address by visiting “Email Alerts” under the “Information Request” section of the “Investors” portion of our website at http://www.brixmor.com.

Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Portfolio and Our Business
Adverse economic, market and real estate conditions may adversely affect our performance.
Our Portfolio is predominantly comprised of community and neighborhood shopping centers. Our performance is, therefore, subject to risks associated with owning and operating these types of real estate assets, including: (1) changes in national, regional and local economic climates; (2) local market conditions, including an oversupply of space in, or a reduction in demand for, properties similar to those in our Portfolio; (3) changes in market rental rates as a result of a decrease in the demand for retail space, including as a result of continuing growth of e-commerce sales; (4) changes in the regional demographics surrounding our properties; (5) competition from other available properties and e-commerce, and the attractiveness of properties in our Portfolio to our tenants; (6) the financial stability of our tenants and the overall financial condition of large retailing companies, including their ability to pay rent and expense reimbursements; (7) in the case of percentage rents, the sales volume of our tenants; (8) the need to periodically fund costs to repair, renovate and re-lease space; (9) increases in operating costs, including costs for maintenance, utilities, insurance and real estate taxes, which are relatively inflexible and generally do not decrease if revenues or occupancy decrease; (10) earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, damage from rising sea levels due to climate change and other natural disasters, civil unrest, terrorist acts or acts of war, which may result in uninsured or underinsured losses; and (11) changes in laws and governmental regulations, including those governing usage, zoning, the environment and taxes. A decline in demand for retail space generally due to these and other factors could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

We face considerable competition in the leasing market and may be unable to renew leases or re-lease space as leases expire. Consequently, we may be required to make rent or other concessions and/or incur significant capital expenditures to improve our Portfolio and/or to retain and attract tenants, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
We compete with a number of other landlords for tenants. As of December 31, 2017, leases are scheduled to expire on a total of approximately 8.5% of leased GLA in our Portfolio during 2018. If our tenants decide not to renew or extend their leases upon expiration, we may not be able to promptly re-lease the space on favorable terms or with reasonable capital investments. If our tenants decide to renew, rental rates upon renewal may be lower than current rates. In these situations, our financial condition and operating results could be adversely impacted.


4



We face considerable competition for tenants and the business of retail shoppers.
There are numerous shopping venues, including regional malls, outlet malls, other shopping centers and e-commerce, which compete with our Portfolio in attracting retailers and shoppers. In order to maintain our attractiveness to retailers and shoppers, we reinvest in our Portfolio in the form of capital improvements. These investments could adversely impact our liquidity and could adversely impact our earnings, particularly when capital improvement projects, including redevelopments, result in space being unavailable to lease for a certain period of time. If we fail to reinvest in our Portfolio, or maintain its attractiveness to retailers and shoppers, if our reinvestments are not successful, or if retailers or shoppers perceive that shopping at other venues is more convenient, cost-effective or otherwise more compelling, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

We may be unable to collect balances due from tenants that file for bankruptcy protection which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
We have seen an increase in retailer bankruptcies in recent years, including some current and former tenants. If a tenant files for bankruptcy, we may not be able to collect amounts owed by that party prior to filing for bankruptcy. In addition, after filing for bankruptcy, a tenant may terminate any or all of its leases with us, in which event we would have a general unsecured claim against such tenant that would likely be worth less than the full amount owed to us for the remainder of the lease term. In these situations, we cannot be certain that we will be able to re-lease space on similar or economically advantageous terms, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Our performance depends on the financial health of tenants in our Portfolio and our continued ability to collect rent when due. Significant retailer distress across our Portfolio could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
Our income is substantially derived from rental income from real property. As a result, our performance depends on the collection of rent from tenants in our Portfolio. Our income would be negatively affected if a significant number of tenants in our Portfolio fail to make rental payments when due or reject leases through bankruptcy. In addition, many of our tenants rely on external sources of financing to operate and grow their businesses, and any disruptions in credit markets could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to obtain debt financing at favorable rates or at all. If our tenants are unable to secure financing necessary to continue to operate or expand their businesses, they may be unable to meet their rent obligations or enter into new leases or renew leases with us, or be forced to declare bankruptcy and reject their leases with us, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

In certain circumstances, a tenant may have a right to terminate its lease. In addition, under certain lease agreements, lease terminations by an anchor tenant or a failure by an anchor tenant to occupy the premises could also result in lease terminations or reductions in rent paid by other tenants in such shopping centers. In these situations, we cannot be certain that we will be able to re-lease space on similar or economically advantageous terms. The loss of rental revenues from a significant number of tenants and difficulty replacing such tenants could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Our expenses may remain constant or increase, even if income from our Portfolio decreases, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
Costs associated with our business, such as real estate and personal property taxes, insurance, utilities, mortgage payments, corporate expenses and maintenance, are relatively inflexible and generally do not decrease in the event that a property is not fully occupied, rental rates decrease, a tenant fails to pay rent or other circumstances causing our revenues to decrease. If we are unable to lower our operating costs when our revenues decline, our financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected. In addition, inflation could result in higher operating costs for us and our tenants and, to the extent we are unable to pass along those cost increases to our tenants, could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

We intend to continue to sell non-strategic shopping centers. However, real estate property investments are illiquid, and it may not be possible to dispose of assets in a timely manner or on favorable terms.
Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms depends on factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers, and we cannot predict the various market conditions affecting real estate investments that will exist at any particular time in the future. Furthermore, we may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make capital improvements before a

5



property can be sold and we cannot assure that we will have funds available to make such capital improvements; and therefore, we may be unable to sell a property or may not be able to sell a property on favorable terms. In addition, the ability to sell assets in our Portfolio may also be restricted by certain covenants in our debt agreements and the credit agreement governing our senior unsecured credit facility agreement, as amended July 25, 2016, (the “Unsecured Credit Facility”). As a result, we may be unable to realize our investment objectives through dispositions, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Our real estate assets may be subject to impairment charges.
We periodically assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our real estate assets and other investments may be impaired. A property’s value is considered to be impaired only if the estimated aggregate future undiscounted property cash flows are less than the carrying value of the property. In our estimate of cash flows, we consider factors such as trends and prospects and the effects of demand and competition on expected future operating income. If we are evaluating the potential sale of an asset or redevelopment alternatives, the undiscounted future cash flows consider the most likely course of action as of the balance sheet date based on current plans, intended holding periods and available market information. We are required to make subjective assessments as to whether there is impairment in the value of our real estate assets and other investments. Impairment charges have an immediate direct impact on our earnings. There can be no assurance that we will not take additional charges in the future related to the impairment of our assets. Any future impairment could have a material adverse effect on our operating results in the period in which the charge is recorded.

We face competition in pursuing acquisition opportunities that could limit our ability to grow and/or increase the cost of such acquisitions, and we may not be able to generate expected returns or successfully integrate these new properties into our existing operations.
We continue to evaluate the market for available properties and may acquire properties when we believe strategic opportunities exist. Our ability to acquire properties on favorable terms and successfully integrate, operate or re-develop them is subject to a number of risks. We may be unable to acquire a desired property because of competition from other well-capitalized real estate investors, including from other REITs and institutional investment funds. Even if we are able to acquire a desired property, competition from other potential acquirers may significantly increase the purchase price. We may also abandon acquisition activities after expending significant resources to pursue such opportunities. Once we acquire new properties, these properties may not yield expected returns for a number of reasons, including: (1) failure to achieve expected occupancy and/or rent levels within the projected time frame, if at all; (2) inability to successfully integrate new properties into existing operations; and (3) exposure to fluctuations in the general economy due to the significant time lag between signing definitive documentation to acquire and the closing of the acquisition of a new property. If any of these events occur, the cost of the acquisition may exceed, or the expected returns may not achieve, initial estimates, which may result in lower returns or losses from such investments.

Current and future redevelopment projects may not yield expected returns.
We are active in the redevelopment of our properties, and these redevelopment activities are subject to a number of risks, including: (1) abandonment of redevelopment after expending resources to pursue such opportunities; (2) construction delays; (3) cost overruns, including construction costs that exceed original estimates; (4) failure to achieve expected occupancy and/or rent levels within the projected time frame, if at all; (5)  changes to zoning or land use laws or the delays or failures to obtain necessary zoning, occupancy, land use and other governmental permits; and (6) exposure to fluctuations in the general economy due to the significant time lag between commencement and completion of redevelopment projects. If any of these events occur, overall project costs may significantly exceed initial cost estimates, which may result in lower returns or losses from such investments.

We utilize a significant amount of indebtedness in the operation of our business.
As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $5.7 billion aggregate principal amount of indebtedness outstanding, including $0.9 billion of secured loans, excluding the impact of unamortized premiums. Our leverage could have important consequences to us. For example, it could (1) require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to principal and interest payments on our indebtedness, reducing the cash flow available to fund our business, to pay dividends, including those necessary to maintain our REIT qualification, or to use for other purposes; (2) increase our vulnerability to an economic downturn; (3) limit our ability to withstand competitive pressures; and (4) reduce our flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions. In addition, non-compliance with the terms of our debt agreements could result in (1) the acceleration of a significant amount of debt;

6



(2) in the case of secured debt, result in the loss of specific assets due to foreclosure; and (3) materially impair our ability to borrow unused amounts under existing financing arrangements or to obtain additional financing or refinancing on favorable terms or at all. Any of these outcomes could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flows or the per share trading price of our common stock.

Our cash flows and operating results could be adversely affected by required debt service payments and other risks related to our debt financing.
We are generally subject to risks associated with debt financing. These risks include: (1) our cash flow may not be sufficient to satisfy required payments of principal and interest; (2) debt service obligations reduce funds available for distributions to our stockholders; (3) required debt payments are not reduced if the economic performance of any property or the Portfolio as a whole declines; (4) we may not be able to refinance existing indebtedness as necessary or the terms of such refinancing may be less favorable to us than the terms of the existing debt; (5) a default on our indebtedness could result in acceleration of a significant amount of debt; and (6) in the case of secured debt, the loss of specific assets due to foreclosure. During 2018, we have $185.0 million of unsecured loans scheduled to mature and we have $18.1 million of scheduled mortgage amortization payments. We currently intend to fund the scheduled maturities and amortization payments with operating cash and borrowings on our Unsecured Credit Facility. Any of these risks could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results or cash flows.

Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, and an increase in our debt service obligations may adversely affect our cash flows and operating results.
Borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility, unsecured $600.0 million term loan agreement, as amended on July 25, 2016 (the “$600 Million Term Loan”), and unsecured $300.0 million term loan agreement, as entered into on July 28, 2017 (the “$300 Million Term Loan”) bear interest at variable rates. If interest rates were to increase, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed would remain the same, and our net income and cash flows would correspondingly decrease. In order to partially mitigate our exposure to increases in interest rates, we have entered into interest rate swaps on $1.4 billion of our variable rate debt, which involve the exchange of variable for fixed rate interest payments. Taking into account our current interest rate swap agreements, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in a $1.9 million increase in annual interest expense.

We may be unable to obtain additional capital through the debt and equity markets, which would have a material adverse effect on our growth strategy and our financial condition and operating results.
We cannot assure that we will be able to access the capital markets to obtain additional debt or equity financing or that we will be able to obtain capital on terms favorable to us. Our access to external capital depends upon a number of factors, including general market conditions, our current and potential future earnings, the market’s perception of our growth potential, cash distributions and the market price of our common stock. Our inability to obtain financing on favorable terms could result in: (1) a negative effect on our ability to operate, maintain or reinvest in our Portfolio; (2) an inability to acquire new properties; (3) an inability to repay or refinance our indebtedness on or before maturity; or (4) the need to dispose of some of our assets on terms which may be unfavorable to us.

Adverse changes in our credit rating could affect our borrowing capacity and borrowing terms.
Our credit worthiness is rated by nationally recognized credit rating agencies. The credit ratings assigned are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, financial condition and prospects, and other factors viewed by the credit rating agencies as relevant to our industry and the economic outlook in general. Our credit rating can affect our ability to access debt capital, as well as the terms of certain existing and future debt financing we obtain. Since we depend on debt financing to fund our business, an adverse change in our credit rating, including changes in our credit outlook, or even the initiation of a review of our credit rating that could result in an adverse change, could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Covenants in our debt agreements may restrict our operating activities and adversely affect our financial condition.
Our debt agreements contain various financial and operating covenants, including, among other things, certain coverage ratios, as well as limitations on the ability to incur secured and unsecured debt. In addition, certain of our mortgages contain customary negative covenants which, among other things, limit our ability, without the prior consent of the lender, to further mortgage or dispose of the property, to enter into new leases or materially modify certain existing leases at the property, or to redevelop the property. These covenants may limit our operational

7



flexibility and disposition activities. The breach of any of these covenants, if not cured within any applicable cure period, could result in a default under our indebtedness, which could result in the acceleration of certain indebtedness. If any of our indebtedness is accelerated prior to maturity, we may not be able to repay or refinance such indebtedness on favorable terms, or at all, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Legal proceedings related to the Audit Committee review may result in significant costs and expenses and divert resources from our operations and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows.
As discussed under the heading “Legal Matters” in Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements in this report, the Company is engaged in legal matters related to the Audit Committee review. As a result of these and possible future legal proceedings related to the Audit Committee review, we may incur significant professional fees and other costs, damages and fines, some of which may be in excess of our insurance coverage or not be covered by our insurance coverage. In addition, the SEC and the Department of Justice could impose other sanctions against us or our directors and officers, including injunctions, a cease and desist order and other equitable remedies. Our Board of Directors, management and employees may also expend a substantial amount of time on these legal proceedings and investigations, diverting resources and attention that would otherwise be directed toward our operations and implementation of our business strategy. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows.

An uninsured loss on properties or a loss that exceeds the limits of our insurance policies could result in a loss of our investment or related revenue in those properties.
We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage, business interruption and acts of terrorism insurance with policy specifications and insured limits customarily carried for similar properties. There are, however, certain types of losses, such as from hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, earthquakes, terrorism or wars, which may be uninsurable, or not economically justifiable based on the cost of insuring against such losses. In addition, tenants generally are required to indemnify and hold us harmless from liabilities resulting from injury to persons or damage to personal or real property, on the premises, due to activities conducted by tenants or their agents on the properties (including without limitation any environmental contamination), and at the tenant’s expense, to obtain and keep in full force during the term of the lease, liability and property damage insurance policies. However, tenants may not properly maintain their insurance policies or have the ability to pay the deductibles associated with such policies. In addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged. Should a loss occur that is uninsured or in an amount exceeding the combined aggregate limits for the policies noted above, or in the event of a loss that is subject to a substantial deductible under an insurance policy, we could lose all or part of the capital invested in, and anticipated revenue from, one or more of the properties, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Environmental conditions that exist at some of the properties in our Portfolio could result in significant unexpected costs.
We are subject to federal, state and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operations conducted on real property. Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, we may be or become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous substances released on or in our property or disposed of by us or our tenants, as well as certain other potential costs which could relate to hazardous or toxic substances (including governmental fines and injuries to persons and property). Such liability may be imposed whether or not we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence of these hazardous or toxic substances. As is the case with many community and neighborhood shopping centers, many of our properties had or have on-site dry cleaners and/or on-site gasoline retailing facilities and these prior or current uses could potentially increase our environmental liability exposure. The cost of investigation, remediation or removal of such substances may be substantial, and the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, may adversely affect our ability to lease such property, to borrow using such property as collateral, or to dispose of such property.

We are aware that soil and groundwater contamination exists at some of the properties in our Portfolio. The primary contaminants of concern at these properties include perchloroethylene and trichloroethylene (associated with the operations of on-site dry cleaners) and petroleum hydrocarbons (associated with the operations of on-site gasoline retailing facilities). There may also be asbestos-containing materials at some of the properties in our Portfolio.

8



Further, no assurance can be given that any environmental studies performed have identified or will identify all material environmental conditions that may exist with respect to any of the properties in our Portfolio.

Further information relating to recognition of remediation obligations in accordance with GAAP is discussed under the heading “Environmental matters” in Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements in this report.

Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and fire, safety and other regulations may require us to make expenditures that adversely affect our cash flows.
All of the properties in our Portfolio are required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities,” but generally requires that buildings be made accessible to people with disabilities. Compliance with the ADA requirements could require removal of access barriers, and non-compliance could result in the imposition of fines by the United States government or an award of damages to private litigants, or both. We are continuing to assess our Portfolio to determine our compliance with the current requirements of the ADA. We are required to comply with the ADA within the common areas of our Portfolio and we may not be able to pass on to our tenants the costs necessary to remediate any common area ADA issues. As a result, we could be required to expend funds to comply with the provisions of the ADA, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results. In addition, we are required to operate the properties in compliance with fire and safety regulations, building codes and other land use regulations, as they may be adopted by governmental agencies and bodies and become applicable to our Portfolio. As a result, we may be required to make substantial capital expenditures to comply with, and we may be restricted in our ability to renovate or redevelop the properties subject to, those requirements. The resulting expenditures and restrictions could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results or cash flows.

We and our tenants face risks relating to cybersecurity attacks that could cause loss of confidential information and other business disruptions.
We rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions and operate and manage our business, and our business is at risk from and may be impacted by cybersecurity attacks. These could include attempts to gain unauthorized access to our data and computer systems. Attacks can be both individual and highly organized attempts by very sophisticated hacking organizations. We employ a number of measures to prevent, detect and mitigate these threats, which include password protection, frequent mandatory password change events, firewall detection systems, frequent backups, a redundant data system for core applications and annual penetration testing; however, there is no guarantee that such efforts will be successful in preventing a cybersecurity attack. A cybersecurity attack could compromise the confidential information of our employees, tenants and vendors. A successful attack could disrupt and affect our business operations, damage our reputation, and result in significant litigation and remediation costs. Similarly, our tenants rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions and manage their businesses and thus are also at risk from and may be impacted by cybersecurity attacks. An interruption in the business operations of our tenants or in their reputation resulting from a cybersecurity attack could indirectly impact our business operations. As of December 31, 2017, we have not had any material incidences involving cybersecurity attacks.

We are highly dependent upon senior management, and failure to attract and retain key members of senior management could have a material adverse effect on us.
We are highly dependent on the performance and continued efforts of our senior management team. Our future success is dependent on our ability to continue to attract and retain qualified executive officers and senior management. Any inability to manage our operations effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows.

Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure
BPG’s board of directors may change significant corporate policies without stockholder approval.
BPG’s investment, financing and dividend policies and our policies with respect to all other business activities, including strategy and operations, will be determined by BPG’s board of directors. These policies may be amended or revised at any time and from time to time at the discretion of BPG’s board of directors without a vote of our stockholders. BPG’s charter also provides that BPG’s board of directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election without approval of BPG’s stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in BPG’s best interests to attempt to qualify, or to continue to qualify, as a REIT. In addition, BPG’s board of directors may change BPG’s policies with respect to conflicts of interest provided that such changes are consistent with applicable legal

9



requirements. A change in these policies or the termination of BPG’s REIT election could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, our operating results, our cash flow, the per share trading price of BPG’s common stock and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to pay dividends to BPG’s stockholders.

BPG’s board of directors may approve the issuance of stock, including preferred stock, with terms that may discourage a third party from acquiring us.
BPG’s charter permits its board of directors to authorize the issuance of stock in one or more classes or series. Our board of directors may also classify or reclassify any unissued stock and establish the preferences, conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption of any such stock, which rights may be superior to those of our common stock. Thus, BPG’s board of directors could authorize the issuance of shares of a class or series of stock with terms and conditions which could have the effect of discouraging an unsolicited acquisition of us or change of our control in which holders of some or a majority of BPG’s outstanding common stock might receive a premium for their shares over the then current market price of our common stock.

The rights of BPG and BPG stockholders to take action against BPG’s directors and officers are limited.
BPG’s charter eliminates the liability of BPG’s directors and officers to us and BPG’s stockholders for money damages to the maximum extent permitted under Maryland law. Under current Maryland law and BPG’s charter, BPG’s directors and officers do not have any liability to BPG or BPG’s stockholders for money damages other than liability resulting from:

actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; or
active and deliberate dishonesty by the director or officer that was established by a final judgment and is material to the cause of action adjudicated.

BPG’s charter authorizes BPG and BPG’s bylaws require BPG to indemnify each of BPG’s directors or officers who is or is threatened to be made a party to or witness in a proceeding by reason of his or her service in those or certain other capacities, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, from and against any claim or liability to which such person may become subject or which such person may incur by reason of his or her status as a present or former director or officer of BPG. In addition, BPG may be obligated to pay or reimburse the expenses incurred by BPG’s present and former directors and officers without requiring a preliminary determination of their ultimate entitlement to indemnification. As a result, BPG and BPG’s stockholders may have more limited rights to recover money damages from BPG’s directors and officers than might otherwise exist absent these provisions in BPG’s charter and bylaws or that might exist with other companies, which could limit the recourse of stockholders in the event of actions that are not in BPG’s best interests.

BPG’s charter contains a provision that expressly permits BPG’s non-employee directors to compete with us.
BPG’s charter provides that, to the maximum extent permitted from time to time by Maryland law, BPG renounce any interest or expectancy that BPG has in, or any right to be offered an opportunity to participate in, any business opportunities that are from time to time presented to or developed by BPG’s directors or their affiliates, other than to those directors who are employed by BPG or BPG’s subsidiaries, unless the business opportunity is expressly offered or made known to such person in his or her capacity as a director. Non-employee directors or any of their affiliates, will not have any duty to refrain from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the same business activities or similar business activities or lines of business in which we or our affiliates engage or propose to engage or to refrain from otherwise competing with us or our affiliates.

BPG’s charter provides that, to the maximum extent permitted from time to time by Maryland law, each of BPG’s non-employee directors, and any of their affiliates, may:

acquire, hold and dispose of shares of BPG’s stock or OP Units for his or her own account or for the account of others, and exercise all of the rights of a stockholder of Brixmor Property Group Inc. or a limited partner of our Operating Partnership, to the same extent and in the same manner as if he, she or it were not BPG’s director or stockholder; and
in his, her or its personal capacity or in his, her or its capacity as a director, officer, trustee, stockholder, partner, member, equity owner, manager, advisor or employee of any other person, have business interests and engage, directly or indirectly, in business activities that are similar to ours or compete with us, that involve a business opportunity that we could seize and develop or that include the acquisition, syndication,

10



holding, management, development, operation or disposition of interests in mortgages, real property or persons engaged in the real estate business.

BPG’s charter also provides that, to the maximum extent permitted from time to time by Maryland law, in the event that any non-employee director, or any of their respective affiliates, acquires knowledge of a potential transaction or other business opportunity, such person will have no duty to communicate or offer such transaction or business opportunity to us or any of our affiliates and may take any such opportunity for itself, himself or herself or offer it to another person or entity unless the business opportunity is expressly offered to such person in their capacity as our director. These provisions may limit our ability to pursue business or investment opportunities that we might otherwise have had the opportunity to pursue, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, operating results, cash flows and the per share trading price of our common stock.

Risks Related to our REIT Status and Certain Other Tax Items
If BPG does not maintain its qualification as a REIT, it will be subject to tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability.
BPG expects to continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code. However, qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which only a limited number of judicial or administrative interpretations exist. Notwithstanding the availability of cure provisions in the Code, BPG could fail to meet various compliance requirements, which could jeopardize its REIT status. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for BPG to qualify as a REIT. H.R. 1, the tax reform legislation signed into law on December 22, 2017 and which generally takes effect for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, makes fundamental changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to businesses and their owners, including REITs and their stockholders.

If BPG fails to qualify as a REIT in any tax year and BPG is not entitled to relief under applicable statutory provisions:

BPG would be taxed as a non-REIT “C” corporation, which under current laws, among other things, means being unable to deduct dividends paid to stockholders in computing taxable income and being subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income at normal corporate income tax rates, which would reduce BPG’s cash available for distribution to stockholders; and
BPG would be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which it failed to qualify as a REIT.

Complying with REIT requirements may force BPG to liquidate or restructure otherwise attractive investments or forego otherwise attractive investment opportunities.
In order to qualify as a REIT, BPG must also ensure that, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of its assets consists of cash, cash equivalents, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets. BPG’s investments in securities cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer unless (1) such issuer is a REIT, (2) BPG and such issuer jointly elect for such issuer to be treated as a “taxable REIT subsidiary” under the Code, or (3) for purposes of the 10% value limitation only, the securities satisfy certain requirements and are not considered “securities” for this test. The total value of all of BPG’s investments in taxable REIT subsidiaries cannot exceed 25% (20% effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017) of the value of BPG’s total assets. In addition, no more than 5% of the value of BPG’s assets can consist of the securities of any one issuer other than a taxable REIT subsidiary, and no more than 25% of the value of BPG’s total assets may be represented by debt instruments issued by “publicly offered REITs” (as defined under the Code) that are “nonqualified” (e.g., not secured by real property or interests in real property). If BPG fails to comply with these requirements, BPG must dispose of a portion of its assets within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter in order to avoid losing its REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, BPG may be required to liquidate from its portfolio, or contribute to a taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”), otherwise attractive investments in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT. These actions could have the effect of reducing BPG’s income and amounts available for distribution to its stockholders. BPG may be unable to pursue investments that would otherwise be advantageous to it in order to satisfy the income or asset diversification requirements for qualifying as a REIT. Thus, compliance with REIT requirements may hinder BPG’s ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.


11



From time to time, BPG’s cash flows may be insufficient to fund distributions required to maintain our qualification as a REIT. If BPG does not have other funds available in these situations, we may need to borrow funds on a short-term basis or sell assets, even if the then-prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings or sales, in order to satisfy our REIT distribution requirements. These options could adversely affect BPG’s financial condition, operating results or cash flows.

In addition, the REIT provisions of the Code impose a 100% tax on income from “prohibited transactions.”  Prohibited transactions generally include sales of assets, other than foreclosure property, that constitute inventory or other property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.  This 100% tax could affect BPG’s decisions to sell property if it believes such sales could be treated as a prohibited transaction.  However, BPG would not be subject to this tax if it were to sell assets through its TRS.

Complying with REIT requirements may limit BPG’s ability to hedge effectively and may cause BPG to incur tax liabilities.
The REIT provisions of the Code substantially limit BPG’s ability to hedge its liabilities. Any income from a hedging transaction BPG enters into to manage the risk of interest rate changes with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets, or manage the risk of certain currency fluctuations, if clearly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations, does not constitute “gross income” for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests that BPG must satisfy in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT. To the extent that BPG enters into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions is likely to be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both of the gross income tests. As a result of these rules, BPG intends to limit its use of hedging techniques that are not clearly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations or implement those hedges through a domestic TRS. This could increase the cost of BPG’s hedging activities because its TRS would be subject to tax on gains or it could expose BPG to greater risks than BPG would otherwise want to bear.

BPG’s charter does not permit any person to own more than 9.8% of BPG’s outstanding common stock or of BPG’s outstanding stock of all classes or series, and attempts to acquire BPG’s common stock or BPG’s stock of all other classes or series in excess of these limits would not be effective without an exemption from these limits by BPG’s board of directors.
For BPG to qualify as a REIT under the Code, not more than 50% of the value of BPG’s outstanding stock may be owned directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (including certain entities treated as individuals for this purpose) during the last half of a taxable year. For the purpose of assisting BPG’s qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, among other purposes, BPG’s charter prohibits beneficial or constructive ownership by any person of more than a certain percentage, currently 9.8%, in value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of BPG’s common stock or 9.8% in value of the outstanding shares of BPG’s stock, which BPG refers to as the “ownership limit.” The constructive ownership rules under the Code and BPG’s charter are complex and may cause shares of the outstanding common stock owned by a group of related persons to be deemed to be constructively owned by one person. As a result, the acquisition of less than 9.8% of BPG’s outstanding common stock or BPG’s stock by a person could cause a person to own constructively in excess of 9.8% of BPG’s outstanding common stock or BPG’s stock, respectively, and thus violate the ownership limit. There can be no assurance that BPG’s board of directors, as permitted in the charter, will not decrease this ownership limit in the future. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of BPG’s stock in excess of the ownership limit without an exemption from BPG’s board of directors will result either in the shares in excess of the limit being transferred by operation of the charter to a charitable trust or the transfer being void, and the person who attempted to acquire such excess shares will not have any rights in such excess shares.

The ownership limit may have the effect of precluding a change in control of BPG by a third party, even if such change in control would be in the best interests of BPG’s stockholders or would result in BPG’s stockholders receiving a premium for their shares over the then current market price of our common stock (and even if such change in control would not reasonably jeopardize BPG’s REIT status). The exemptions to the ownership limit granted to date may limit BPG’s board of directors’ power to increase the ownership limit or grant further exemptions in the future.





12



Failure to qualify as a domestically-controlled REIT could subject BPG’s non-U.S. stockholders to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.
BPG will be a domestically-controlled REIT if, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of its shares are held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. stockholders. Because its shares are publicly traded, BPG cannot guarantee that it will, in fact, be a domestically-controlled REIT. If BPG fails to qualify as a domestically-controlled REIT, its non-U.S. stockholders that otherwise would not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the gain attributable to a sale of BPG’s shares would be subject to taxation upon such a sale if either (a) the shares were not considered to be “regularly traded” under applicable Treasury regulations on an established securities market, such as the NYSE, or (b) the shares were considered to be “regularly traded” on an established securities market and the selling non-U.S. stockholder owned, actually or constructively, more than 10% in value of the outstanding shares at any time during specified testing periods. If gain on the sale or exchange of BPG’s shares was subject to taxation for these reasons, the non-U.S. stockholder would be subject to federal income tax with respect to any gain on a net basis in a manner similar to the taxation of a taxable U.S. stockholder, subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax and special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals, and corporate non-U.S. stockholders may be subject to an additional branch profits tax.

BPG may choose to make distributions in BPG’s own stock, in which case stockholders may be required to pay income taxes without receiving any cash dividends.
In connection with BPG’s qualification as a REIT, BPG is required to annually distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain. Although it does not currently intend to do so, in order to satisfy this requirement, BPG is permitted, subject to certain conditions and limitations, to make distributions that are in part payable in shares of BPG’s stock. Taxable stockholders receiving such distributions will be required to include the full amount of such distributions as ordinary dividend income to the extent of BPG’s current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, U.S. stockholders may be required to pay income taxes with respect to such distributions in excess of the cash portion of the distribution received. Accordingly, U.S. stockholders receiving a distribution of BPG’s shares may be required to sell shares received in such distribution or may be required to sell other stock or assets owned by them, at a time that may be disadvantageous, in order to satisfy any tax imposed on such distribution. Furthermore, with respect to certain non-U.S. stockholders, BPG may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to such distribution, including in respect of all or a portion of such distribution that is payable in stock, by withholding or disposing of part of the shares included in such distribution and using the proceeds of such disposition to satisfy the withholding tax imposed. In addition, if a significant number of BPG’s stockholders determine to sell shares of BPG’s stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividend income, such sale may put downward pressure on the market price of BPG’s stock.

Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
The maximum tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income payable by non-REIT “C” corporations to certain non-corporate U.S. stockholders has been reduced by legislation to 23.8% (taking into account the 3.8% Medicare tax applicable to net investment income). Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates. Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, non-corporate U.S. stockholders may deduct 20% of their dividends from REITs (excluding qualified dividend income and capital gains dividends). For non-corporate U.S. stockholders in the top marginal tax bracket of 37%, the deduction for REIT dividends yields an effective income tax rate of 29.6% on REIT dividends, which is higher than the 20% tax rate on qualified dividend income paid by non-REIT “C” corporations. This does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs; however, the more favorable rates applicable to non-REIT “C” corporate qualified dividends could cause certain non-corporate investors to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT “C” corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including BPG.

Tax laws and related interpretations may change at any time, and any such legislative or other actions could have a negative effect on BPG.
The IRS, the United States Treasury Department and Congress frequently review U.S. federal income tax legislation, regulations and other guidance. BPG cannot predict whether, when or to what extent new U.S. federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will be adopted. Any legislative action may prospectively or retroactively modify BPG’s tax treatment and, therefore, may adversely affect taxation of BPG or BPG’s stockholders. In particular, H.R. 1 makes many significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws that will profoundly impact

13



the taxation of individuals and corporations (both non-REIT “C” corporations as well as corporations that have elected to be taxed as REITs). A number of changes that affect non-corporate taxpayers will expire at the end of 2025 unless Congress acts to extend them. These changes will impact BPG and BPG’s stockholders in various ways, some of which are adverse or potentially adverse compared to prior law. To date, the IRS has issued only limited guidance with respect to certain of the new provisions, and there are numerous interpretive issues that will require guidance. It is highly likely that technical corrections legislation will be needed to clarify certain aspects of the new law and give proper effect to Congressional intent. There can be no assurance, however, that technical clarifications or changes needed to prevent unintended or unforeseen tax consequences will be enacted by Congress in the near future.

Risks Related to Ownership of BPG’s Common Stock
The cash available for distribution to stockholders may not be sufficient to pay dividends at expected levels and, as a result, we may use borrowed funds to make distributions or we may be unable to make distributions in the future.
If cash available for distributions decreases in future periods, our inability to make expected distributions could result in a decrease in the market price of BPG’s common stock. See “Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.” All distributions will be made at the discretion of BPG’s board of directors and will depend on our earnings, our financial condition, maintenance of BPG’s REIT qualification and other factors as BPG’s board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. We may not be able to make distributions in the future or we may need to fund a portion or all of the distribution with borrowed funds. If we borrow to fund distributions, our future interest costs would increase, thereby reducing our earnings and cash available for distribution from what they otherwise would have been. To the extent that we decide to make distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions would generally be considered a return of capital for federal income tax purposes to the extent of the holder’s adjusted tax basis in their shares. A return of capital is not taxable, but it has the effect of reducing the holder’s adjusted tax basis in its investment. To the extent that distributions exceed the adjusted tax basis of a holder’s shares, they will be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of such stock.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they downgrade their recommendations regarding BPG’s common stock, BPG’s share price and trading volume may decline.
The trading market for BPG’s shares is influenced by the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. Events that could adversely affect BPG’s share price and trading volume include: (1) BPG’s operating results being below the expectations of securities and industry analysts and investors; (2) downgrades or inaccurate or unfavorable research about BPG’s business published by analysts; or (3) the termination of research coverage or the failure by analysts to regularly publish reports on us, which may cause us to lose visibility in the financial markets. A less liquid market for BPG’s shares may also impair our ability to raise additional equity capital by issuing shares and may impair our ability to acquire additional properties or other businesses by using BPG’s shares as consideration.

The market price of BPG’s common stock could be adversely affected by market conditions and by our actual and expected future earnings and level of distributions.
The stock market in general, and the NYSE and REIT markets in particular experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of shares without regard to our operating performance. For example, the trading prices of equity securities issued by REITs have historically been affected by changes in market interest rates. An increase in market interest rates, or a decrease in our distributions to stockholders, may lead prospective purchasers of shares of BPG’s common stock to demand a higher distribution rate or seek alternative investments. The market value of equity securities is also based upon the market’s perception of the growth potential and current and potential future cash distributions of a security, whether from operations, sales or refinancings, and, for REITs, is secondarily based upon the real estate market value of the underlying assets. Our failure to meet the market’s expectations with regard to future earnings and distributions would likely adversely affect the market price of BPG’s common stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.


14



Item 2.    Properties
As of December 31, 2017, our Portfolio consisted of 486 shopping centers with approximately 83 million square feet of GLA. In addition, we have one land parcel currently under development. Our high quality national Portfolio is primarily located within established trade areas in the top 50 MSAs, and our shopping centers are primarily anchored by non-discretionary and value-oriented retailers, as well as consumer-oriented service providers. Our three largest tenants by annualized base rent are The TJX Companies, Inc., The Kroger Co., and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

The following table summarizes the top 20 tenants by ABR in our Portfolio as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
Retailer
 
Owned Leases
 
Leased GLA
 
Percent of Total
Portfolio GLA
 
Leased ABR
 
Percent of Portfolio Leased ABR
 
 ABR PSF
The TJX Companies, Inc.
 
90

 
2,805,560

 
3.4
%
 
$
29,966

 
3.2
%
 
$
10.68

The Kroger Co.
 
65

 
4,258,570

 
5.1
%
 
29,890

 
3.1
%
 
7.02

Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
 
155

 
1,766,751

 
2.1
%
 
18,372

 
1.9
%
 
10.40

Publix Super Markets, Inc.
 
37

 
1,676,247

 
2.0
%
 
15,723

 
1.7
%
 
9.38

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
 
25

 
3,085,756

 
3.7
%
 
13,613

 
1.4
%
 
4.41

Ahold Delhaize
 
24

 
1,294,441

 
1.6
%
 
13,095

 
1.4
%
 
10.12

Burlington Stores, Inc.
 
23

 
1,572,515

 
1.9
%
 
12,883

 
1.4
%
 
8.19

Albertsons Companies, Inc.
 
21

 
1,194,862

 
1.4
%
 
12,758

 
1.3
%
 
10.68

Ross Stores, Inc
 
35

 
958,511

 
1.2
%
 
10,555

 
1.1
%
 
11.01

Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
 
33

 
809,213

 
1.0
%
 
10,411

 
1.1
%
 
12.87

Big Lots, Inc.
 
44

 
1,454,514

 
1.8
%
 
9,394

 
1.0
%
 
6.46

PetSmart, Inc.
 
29

 
646,099

 
0.8
%
 
9,390

 
1.0
%
 
14.53

L.A Fitness International, LLC
 
13

 
552,515

 
0.7
%
 
8,689

 
0.9
%
 
15.73

PETCO Animal Supplies, Inc.
 
37

 
491,801

 
0.6
%
 
8,302

 
0.9
%
 
16.88

Best Buy Co., Inc.
 
15

 
613,462

 
0.7
%
 
8,262

 
0.9
%
 
13.47

Office Depot, Inc.
 
32

 
700,208

 
0.8
%
 
7,814

 
0.8
%
 
11.16

Party City Holdco Inc.
 
35

 
510,998

 
0.6
%
 
7,452

 
0.8
%
 
14.58

DICK’S Sporting Goods, Inc.
 
14

 
539,639

 
0.7
%
 
7,430

 
0.8
%
 
13.77

Staples, Inc.
 
27

 
562,443

 
0.7
%
 
7,022

 
0.7
%
 
12.48

The Michaels Companies, Inc.
 
26

 
581,254

 
0.7
%
 
6,841

 
0.7
%
 
11.77

TOP 20 RETAILERS
 
780

 
26,075,359

 
31.5
%
 
$
247,862

 
26.1
%
 
$
9.51
























15



The following table summarizes the geographic diversity of our Portfolio by state as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands, expect per square foot information):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Percent of
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of
 
 
 
Percent
 
Percent
 
 
 
 
 
Number of
 
Percent
 
Percent
 
State
 
Properties
 
 GLA
 
Billed
 
Leased
 
 ABR
 
 ABR PSF(1) 
 
Properties
 
of GLA
 
of ABR
1

Texas
 
65

 
9,510,391

 
90.1
%
 
92.2
%
 
$
110,084

 
$
13.36

 
13.4
%
 
11.5
%
 
11.6
%
2

Florida
 
55

 
8,772,427

 
88.8
%
 
90.7
%
 
106,280

 
13.86

 
11.3
%
 
10.6
%
 
11.2
%
3

California
 
32

 
6,121,721

 
94.6
%
 
97.4
%
 
103,347

 
18.73

 
6.6
%
 
7.4
%
 
10.9
%
4

Pennsylvania
 
34

 
5,837,674

 
93.8
%
 
94.5
%
 
67,760

 
14.71

 
7.0
%
 
7.0
%
 
7.1
%
5

New York
 
28

 
3,559,268

 
92.0
%
 
93.7
%
 
60,817

 
18.72

 
5.8
%
 
4.3
%
 
6.4
%
6

Illinois
 
22

 
4,709,788

 
81.7
%
 
85.4
%
 
48,143

 
12.58

 
4.5
%
 
5.7
%
 
5.1
%
7

Georgia
 
35

 
4,856,395

 
89.5
%
 
91.2
%
 
45,817

 
10.62

 
7.2
%
 
5.9
%
 
4.8
%
8

New Jersey
 
18

 
3,089,307

 
89.9
%
 
92.8
%
 
42,963

 
15.89

 
3.7
%
 
3.7
%
 
4.5
%
9

North Carolina
 
20

 
4,241,985

 
92.6
%
 
93.2
%
 
42,210

 
11.43

 
4.1
%
 
5.1
%
 
4.4
%
10

Ohio
 
21

 
4,088,047

 
93.1
%
 
94.0
%
 
40,546

 
11.99

 
4.3
%
 
4.9
%
 
4.3
%
11

Michigan
 
19

 
3,902,104

 
90.2
%
 
91.1
%
 
37,742

 
13.22

 
3.9
%
 
4.7
%
 
4.0
%
12

Connecticut
 
13

 
2,162,501

 
93.5
%
 
95.1
%
 
30,065

 
15.66

 
2.7
%
 
2.6
%
 
3.2
%
13

Tennessee
 
15

 
3,062,513

 
91.1
%
 
92.7
%
 
29,688

 
11.03

 
3.1
%
 
3.7
%
 
3.1
%
14

Massachusetts
 
11

 
1,871,739

 
93.1
%
 
95.7
%
 
21,722

 
15.41

 
2.3
%
 
2.3
%
 
2.3
%
15

Colorado
 
6

 
1,473,147

 
87.0
%
 
90.8
%
 
19,293

 
14.49

 
1.2
%
 
1.8
%
 
2.0
%
16

Kentucky
 
9

 
2,074,205

 
94.0
%
 
94.9
%
 
18,721

 
10.45

 
1.9
%
 
2.5
%
 
2.0
%
17

Indiana
 
12

 
1,877,402

 
83.3
%
 
88.7
%
 
15,908

 
10.86

 
2.5
%
 
2.3
%
 
1.7
%
18

Minnesota
 
9

 
1,362,713

 
88.7
%
 
91.3
%
 
15,443

 
13.10

 
1.9
%
 
1.6
%
 
1.6
%
19

Virginia
 
10

 
1,392,586

 
90.9
%
 
91.0
%
 
14,342

 
11.92

 
2.1
%
 
1.7
%
 
1.5
%
20

South Carolina
 
7

 
1,307,923

 
90.1
%
 
91.4
%
 
14,172

 
12.11

 
1.4
%
 
1.6
%
 
1.5
%
21

New Hampshire
 
5

 
772,770

 
89.9
%
 
90.1
%
 
7,764

 
13.89

 
1.0
%
 
0.9
%
 
0.8
%
22

Missouri
 
6

 
865,816

 
88.6
%
 
92.2
%
 
6,782

 
8.67

 
1.2
%
 
1.0
%
 
0.7
%
23

Maryland
 
4

 
468,667

 
98.3
%
 
98.3
%
 
6,660

 
14.46

 
0.8
%
 
0.6
%
 
0.7
%
24

Wisconsin
 
4

 
704,098

 
90.7
%
 
91.6
%
 
6,656

 
10.76

 
0.8
%
 
0.9
%
 
0.7
%
25

Alabama
 
3

 
888,284

 
64.9
%
 
69.9
%
 
5,169

 
8.61

 
0.6
%
 
1.1
%
 
0.5
%
26

Iowa
 
4

 
723,408

 
94.3
%
 
94.3
%
 
4,312

 
6.42

 
0.8
%
 
0.9
%
 
0.5
%
27

Louisiana
 
4

 
619,143

 
79.6
%
 
80.7
%
 
3,432

 
7.48

 
0.8
%
 
0.7
%
 
0.4
%
28

Nevada
 
1

 
278,411

 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
3,269

 
11.89

 
0.2
%
 
0.3
%
 
0.3
%
29

Arizona
 
2

 
288,110

 
92.1
%
 
92.1
%
 
3,204

 
12.08

 
0.4
%
 
0.3
%
 
0.3
%
30

Kansas
 
2

 
370,239

 
92.6
%
 
93.2
%
 
3,178

 
11.85

 
0.4
%
 
0.4
%
 
0.3
%
31

Mississippi
 
2

 
333,275

 
88.6
%
 
88.6
%
 
3,077

 
10.91

 
0.4
%
 
0.4
%
 
0.3
%
32

Delaware
 
1

 
191,974

 
98.3
%
 
98.3
%
 
2,238

 
11.86

 
0.2
%
 
0.2
%
 
0.2
%
33

West Virginia
 
2

 
251,500

 
98.0
%
 
98.0
%
 
2,103

 
8.53

 
0.4
%
 
0.3
%
 
0.2
%
34

Vermont
 
1

 
224,514

 
98.6
%
 
98.6
%
 
1,973

 
8.92

 
0.2
%
 
0.3
%
 
0.2
%
35

Maine
 
1

 
287,513

 
90.0
%
 
90.0
%
 
1,872

 
20.69

 
0.2
%
 
0.3
%
 
0.2
%
36

Oklahoma
 
1

 
186,851

 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
1,850

 
9.90

 
0.2
%
 
0.2
%
 
0.2
%
37

New Mexico
 
2

 
83,800

 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
966

 
11.53

 
0.4
%
 
0.1
%
 
0.1
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL(2)
 
486

 
82,812,209

 
90.3
%
 
92.2
%
 
$
949,568

 
$
13.47

 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
(1)     ABR PSF is calculated as ABR divided by leased GLA, excluding the GLA of lessee owned leasehold improvements.
(2)     Individual values may not add up to totals due to rounding.















16



The following table summarizes certain information for our Portfolio by unit size as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands, expect per square foot information):
 
Number of
Units
 
GLA
 
Percent Billed
 
Percent Leased
 
Percent of Vacant GLA
 
 ABR
 
ABR PSF(1)
≥ 35,000 SF
551

 
33,701,794

 
95.7
%
 
96.4
%
 
18.5
%
 
$
264,145

 
$
9.49

20,000  34,999 SF
549

 
14,426,956

 
91.5
%
 
95.3
%
 
10.5
%
 
139,778

 
10.38

10,000  19,999 SF
726

 
9,898,302

 
90.2
%
 
92.5
%
 
11.5
%
 
118,542

 
13.27

5,000  9,999 SF
1,336

 
9,223,650

 
83.6
%
 
85.6
%
 
20.5
%
 
128,292

 
16.96

< 5,000 SF
7,456

 
15,561,507

 
81.8
%
 
83.8
%
 
39.0
%
 
298,811

 
23.59

TOTAL
10,618

 
82,812,209

 
90.3
%
 
92.2
%
 
100.0
%
 
$
949,568

 
$
13.47

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL ≥ 10,000 SF
1,826

 
58,027,052

 
93.7
%
 
95.5
%
 
40.5
%
 
$
522,465

 
$
10.40

TOTAL < 10,000 SF
8,792

 
24,785,157

 
82.4
%
 
84.5
%
 
59.5
%
 
427,103

 
21.11

(1)     ABR PSF is calculated as ABR divided by leased GLA, excluding the GLA of lessee owned leasehold improvements.

The following table summarizes lease expirations for leases in place within our Portfolio for each of the next ten calendar years and thereafter, assuming no exercise of renewal options over the lease term and including the GLA of lessee owned leasehold improvements, as of December 31, 2017:
 
 
Number of Leases
 
Leased GLA
 
% of Leased GLA
 
% of In-Place ABR
 
In-Place ABR PSF
 
ABR PSF at Expiration
M-M
 
398

 
1,066,381

 
1.4
%
 
1.8
%
 
$
16.47

 
$
16.47

2018
 
1,332

 
6,456,408

 
8.5
%
 
9.1
%
 
13.32

 
13.32

2019
 
1,473

 
10,799,806

 
14.1
%
 
13.3
%
 
11.66

 
11.72

2020
 
1,444

 
11,589,173

 
15.2
%
 
14.3
%
 
11.71

 
11.88

2021
 
1,167

 
10,099,929

 
13.2
%
 
12.6
%
 
11.87

 
12.14

2022
 
1,120

 
9,589,499

 
12.6
%
 
12.7
%
 
12.61

 
13.02

2023
 
561

 
5,776,001

 
7.6
%
 
7.4
%
 
12.14

 
13.05

2024
 
349

 
4,266,022

 
5.6
%
 
5.2
%
 
11.51

 
12.44

2025
 
286

 
3,271,952

 
4.3
%
 
4.6
%
 
13.46

 
14.62

2026
 
303

 
3,226,586

 
4.2
%
 
4.9
%
 
14.48

 
15.85

2027
 
342

 
3,453,920

 
4.5
%
 
5.0
%
 
13.83

 
15.79

2028+
 
366

 
6,745,145

 
8.8
%
 
9.0
%
 
12.73

 
14.81


More specific information with respect to each of our property interests is set forth in Exhibit 99.1, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Leases
Our anchor tenants generally have leases with original terms ranging from 10 to 20 years. Such leases frequently contain renewal options for one or more additional periods. Smaller tenants typically have leases with original terms ranging from five to 10 years, which may or may not contain renewal options. Leases in our Portfolio generally provide for the payment of fixed monthly rent. Leases may also provide for the payment of additional rent based upon a percentage of the tenant’s gross sales above a certain threshold level. Leases typically contain contractual increases in base rent over both the primary terms and renewal periods. Our leases generally include tenant reimbursements of common area expenses, insurance and real estate taxes. Utilities are generally paid by tenants either through separate meters or reimbursement.

The foregoing general description of the characteristics of the leases of our Portfolio is not intended to describe all leases, and material variations in the lease terms exist.

Insurance
We have a wholly owned captive insurance company, Brixmor Incap, LLC (“Incap”). Incap underwrites the first layer of general liability insurance programs for the Company’s properties. The Company formed Incap as part of its overall risk management program and to stabilize insurance costs, manage exposure and recoup expenses through the functions of the captive program. Incap is capitalized in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements.

17



We also maintain commercial liability, fire, extended coverage, earthquake, business interruption and rental loss insurance covering all of the properties in our Portfolio. We select coverage specifications and insured limits which we believe to be appropriate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage, industry practice, and the nature of the shopping centers in our Portfolio. In addition, tenants generally are required to indemnify and hold us harmless from liabilities resulting from injury to persons or damage to personal or real property due to activities conducted by tenants or their agents on the properties (including without limitation any environmental contamination), and at the tenant’s expense, to obtain and keep in full force during the term of the lease, liability and property damage insurance policies. In the opinion of our management, all of the properties in our Portfolio are currently adequately insured. We do not carry insurance for generally uninsured losses such as losses from war. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Portfolio and Our Business – An uninsured loss on properties or a loss that exceeds the limits of our insurance policies could result in a loss of our investment or related revenue in our Portfolio.”

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings
The information contained under the heading “Legal Matters” in Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements in this report is incorporated by reference into this Item 3.

Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.


18



PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 the high and low sales prices for each quarter of BPG’s common stock, which trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “BRX,” and the quarterly declared dividend per share of common stock:
 
 
Stock Price
 
 
Period
 
High
 
Low
 
Cash Dividends Declared
2017:
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter
 
$
25.34

 
$
20.66

 
$
0.260

Second Quarter
 
22.02

 
17.35

 
0.260

Third Quarter
 
20.59

 
17.47

 
0.260

Fourth Quarter
 
19.30

 
17.23

 
0.275

2016:
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter
 
$
26.98

 
$
19.91

 
$
0.245

Second Quarter
 
27.35

 
24.50

 
0.245

Third Quarter
 
29.14

 
26.39

 
0.245

Fourth Quarter
 
27.49

 
23.38

 
0.260


As of February 1, 2018, the number of holders of record of BPG’s common stock was 329.  This figure does not represent the actual number of beneficial owners of BPG’s common stock because shares of BPG’s common stock are frequently held in “street name” by securities dealers and others for the benefit of beneficial owners who may vote the shares.

The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), generally requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and imposes tax on any taxable income retained by a REIT, including capital gains. To satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT and generally not be subject to U.S. federal income and excise tax, BPG intends to make regular quarterly distributions of all or substantially all of BPG’s REIT taxable income to holders of BPG’s common stock out of assets legally available for such purposes.

BPG’s future distributions will be at the sole discretion of BPG’s Board of Directors. When determining the amount of future distributions, we expect that BPG’s Board of Directors will consider, among other factors; (1) the amount of cash recently and expected to be generated from our operating activities; (2) the amount of cash required for capital expenditures and leasing; (3) the amount of cash required for debt repayments, redevelopment, selective acquisitions of new properties and share repurchases; (4) the amount of cash required to be distributed to maintain BPG’s status as a REIT and to reduce any income and excise taxes that BPG otherwise would be required to pay; (5) any limitations on our distributions contained in our financing agreements, including, without limitation, in our Unsecured Credit Facility; (6) the sufficiency of legally-available assets; and (7) our ability to continue to access additional sources of capital.

To the extent BPG is prevented by provisions of our financing arrangements or otherwise from distributing 100% of BPG’s REIT taxable income or otherwise does not distribute 100% of BPG’s REIT taxable income, BPG will be subject to income tax, and potentially excise tax, on the retained amounts. If our operations do not generate sufficient cash flow to allow BPG to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements, we may be required to fund distributions with working capital, borrowed funds, asset sales or may be required to reduce such distributions. For more information regarding risk factors that could materially adversely affect our actual results of operations, please see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”

Distributions to the extent of the Company’s current and accumulated earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes will be taxable to shareholders as ordinary dividend income or capital gain income.  Distributions in excess of taxable earnings and profits generally will be treated as non-taxable return of capital.  These distributions, to the extent that they do not exceed the shareholder’s adjusted tax basis in its common shares, have the effect of deferring taxation until the sale of the shareholder’s common shares.  To the extent that distributions are both in excess of taxable earnings and profits and in excess of the shareholder’s adjusted tax basis in its common shares, the

19



distribution will be treated as capital gain from the sale of common shares.  For the taxable year ended December 31, 2017, 86.4% of the Company’s distributions to shareholders constituted taxable ordinary income and 13.6% constituted a return of capital.

BPG’s Total Stockholder Return Performance
The following performance chart compares, for the period from October 30, 2013 through December 31, 2017, the cumulative total stockholder return on BPG’s common stock with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index and the FTSE NAREIT Equity Shopping Centers Index. Equity real estate investment trusts are defined as those which derive more than 75% of their income from equity investments in real estate assets. All stockholder return performance assumes the reinvestment of dividends. The information in this paragraph and the following performance chart are deemed to be furnished, not filed.

item5graph2017a01.jpg
Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On December 5, 2017, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program for up to $400.0 million of shares of the Company’s common stock. The program is scheduled to expire on December 5, 2019, unless extended by the Board of Directors. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repurchased 326,958 shares of common stock under the program at an average price per share of $17.96 for a total of approximately $5.9 million.
Period
2017
 
Total Number of Shares Repurchased
 
Average Price Paid Per Share
 
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Repurchased (in millions)
October
 

 
$

 
N/A

November
 

 

 
N/A

December
 
326,958

 
17.96

 
$
394.1

Total
 
326,958

 
$
17.96

 
 

20



Item 6.    Selected Financial Data
The following table shows our selected consolidated financial data for BPG and the Operating Partnership and their respective subsidiaries for the periods indicated. This information should be read together with the audited financial statements and notes thereto of BPG and its subsidiaries and the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries and with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
997,089

 
$
998,118

 
$
984,548

 
$
960,715

 
$
887,466

 
Expense reimbursements
278,636

 
270,548

 
276,032

 
268,035

 
242,803

 
Other revenues
7,455

 
7,106

 
5,400

 
7,849

 
16,135

 
Total revenues
1,283,180

 
1,275,772

 
1,265,980

 
1,236,599

 
1,146,404

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating costs
136,092

 
133,429

 
129,477

 
129,148

 
116,522

 
Real estate taxes
179,097

 
174,487

 
180,911

 
179,504

 
168,468

 
Depreciation and amortization
375,028

 
387,302

 
417,935

 
441,630

 
438,547

 
Provision for doubtful accounts
5,323

 
9,182

 
9,540

 
11,537

 
10,899

 
Impairment of real estate assets
40,104

 
5,154

 
1,005

 

 
1,531

 
General and administrative
92,247

 
92,248

 
98,454

 
80,175

 
121,082

 
Total operating expenses
827,891

 
801,802

 
837,322

 
841,994

 
857,049

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income (expense)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends and interest
365

 
542

 
315

 
602

 
832

 
Interest expense
(226,660
)
 
(226,671
)
 
(245,012
)
 
(262,812
)
 
(343,193
)
 
Gain on sale of real estate assets and acquisition of joint venture interest
68,847

 
35,613

 
11,744

 
378

 
2,223

 
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, net
498

 
(832
)
 
1,720

 
(13,761
)
 
(20,028
)
 
Other
(2,907
)
 
(4,957
)
 
(348
)
 
(8,431
)
 
(11,014
)
 
Total other expense
(159,857
)
 
(196,305
)
 
(231,581
)
 
(284,024
)
 
(371,180
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
295,432

 
277,665

 
197,077

 
110,581

 
(81,825
)
 
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
381

 
477

 
459

 
370

 
1,167

 
Gain on disposition of unconsolidated joint venture interests
4,556

 

 

 
1,820

 

 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
300,369

 
278,142

 
197,536

 
112,771

 
(80,658
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discontinued operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 
4,909

 
3,505

 
Gain on disposition of operating properties

 

 

 
15,171

 
3,392

 
Impairment of real estate held for sale

 

 

 

 
(45,122
)
 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

 

 
20,080

 
(38,225
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
300,369

 
278,142

 
197,536

 
132,851

 
(118,883
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests
(76
)
 
(2,514
)
 
(3,816
)
 
(43,849
)
 
25,349

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Brixmor Property Group Inc.
300,293

 
275,628

 
193,720

 
89,002

 
(93,534
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock dividends
(39
)
 
(150
)
 
(150
)
 
(150
)
 
(162
)
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
300,254

 
$
275,478

 
$
193,570

 
$
88,852

 
$
(93,696
)
 
Per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

 
$
0.36

 
$
(0.33
)
 
Diluted
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

 
$
0.36

 
$
(0.33
)
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

 
$
0.36

 
$
(0.50
)
 
Diluted
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

 
$
0.36

 
$
(0.50
)
 
Weighted average shares:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
304,834

 
301,601

 
298,004

 
243,390

 
188,993

 
Diluted
305,281

 
305,060

 
305,017

 
244,588

 
188,993

 
Cash dividends declared per common share
$
1.055

 
$
0.995

 
$
0.92

 
$
0.825

 
$
0.127

 

21



BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
SELECT BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
December 31,
 
Balance sheet data as of the end of each year
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
Real estate, net
 
$
8,560,421

 
$
8,842,004

 
$
9,052,165

 
$
9,253,015

 
$
9,647,558

 
Total assets
 
$
9,153,926

 
$
9,319,685

 
$
9,498,007

 
$
9,681,913

 
$
10,143,487

 
Debt obligations, net(1)
 
$
5,676,238

 
$
5,838,889

 
$
5,974,266

 
$
6,022,508

 
$
5,952,860

 
Total liabilities
 
$
6,245,578

 
$
6,392,525

 
$
6,577,705

 
$
6,701,610

 
$
6,837,500

 
Redeemable non-controlling interests
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
21,467

 
Total equity
 
$
2,908,348

 
$
2,927,160

 
$
2,920,302

 
$
2,980,303

 
$
3,284,520

 
(1) Debt includes secured loans, notes payable, and credit agreements, including unamortized premium or net of unamortized discount and unamortized debt issuance costs.





















































22



BRIXMOR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
997,089

 
$
998,118

 
$
984,548

 
$
960,715

 
$
887,466

 
Expense reimbursements
278,636

 
270,548

 
276,032

 
268,035

 
242,803

 
Other revenues
7,455

 
7,106

 
5,400

 
7,849

 
16,135

 
Total revenues
1,283,180

 
1,275,772

 
1,265,980

 
1,236,599

 
1,146,404

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating costs
136,092

 
133,429

 
129,477

 
129,148

 
116,522

 
Real estate taxes
179,097

 
174,487

 
180,911

 
179,504

 
168,468

 
Depreciation and amortization
375,028

 
387,302

 
417,935

 
441,630

 
438,547

 
Provision for doubtful accounts
5,323

 
9,182

 
9,540

 
11,537

 
10,899

 
Impairment of real estate assets
40,104

 
5,154

 
1,005

 

 
1,531

 
General and administrative
92,247

 
92,248

 
98,454

 
80,175

 
121,078

 
Total operating expenses
827,891

 
801,802

 
837,322

 
841,994

 
857,045

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income (expense)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends and interest
365

 
542

 
315

 
602

 
825

 
Interest expense
(226,660
)
 
(226,671
)
 
(245,012
)
 
(262,812
)
 
(343,193
)
 
Gain on sale of real estate assets and acquisition of joint venture interest
68,847

 
35,613

 
11,744

 
378

 
2,223

 
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, net
498

 
(832
)
 
1,720

 
(13,761
)
 
(20,028
)
 
Other
(2,907
)
 
(4,957
)
 
(348
)
 
(8,431
)
 
(11,005
)
 
Total other expense
(159,857
)
 
(196,305
)
 
(231,581
)
 
(284,024
)
 
(371,178
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
295,432

 
277,665

 
197,077

 
110,581

 
(81,819
)
 
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
381

 
477

 
459

 
370

 
1,167

 
Gain on disposition of unconsolidated joint venture interests
4,556

 

 

 
1,820

 

 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
300,369

 
278,142

 
197,536

 
112,771

 
(80,652
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discontinued operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 
4,909

 
3,505

 
Gain on disposition of operating properties

 

 

 
15,171

 
3,392

 
Impairment on real estate held for sale

 

 

 

 
(45,122
)
 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

 

 
20,080

 
(38,225
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
300,369

 
278,142

 
197,536

 
132,851

 
(118,877
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

 
(1,181
)
 
(1,355
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
$
300,369

 
$
278,142

 
$
197,536

 
$
131,670

 
$
(120,232
)
 
Net income (loss) attributable to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Series A interest
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
21,014

 
$
3,451

 
  Partnership common units
300,369

 
278,142

 
197,536

 
110,656

 
(123,683
)
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
$
300,369

 
$
278,142

 
$
197,536

 
$
131,670

 
$
(120,232
)
 
Per common unit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

 
$
0.36

 
$
(0.33
)
 
Diluted
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

 
$
0.36

 
$
(0.33
)
 
Net income (loss) attributable to partnership common units:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

 
$
0.36

 
$
(0.50
)
 
Diluted
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

 
$
0.36

 
$
(0.50
)
 
Weighted average number of partnership common units:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
304,913

 
304,600

 
303,992

 
302,540

 
250,109

 
Diluted
305,281

 
305,059

 
305,017

 
303,738

 
250,109

 


23



BRIXMOR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
SELECT BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
December 31,
 
Balance sheet data as of the end of each year
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
Real estate, net
 
$
8,560,421

 
$
8,842,004

 
$
9,052,165

 
$
9,253,015

 
$
9,647,558

 
Total assets
 
$
9,153,677

 
$
9,319,434

 
$
9,497,775

 
$
9,681,566

 
$
10,142,381

 
Debt obligations, net(1)
 
$
5,676,238

 
$
5,838,889

 
$
5,974,266

 
$
6,022,508

 
$
5,952,860

 
Total liabilities
 
$
6,245,578

 
$
6,392,525

 
$
6,577,705

 
$
6,701,610

 
$
6,837,490

 
Redeemable non-controlling interests
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
21,467

 
Total capital
 
$
2,908,099

 
$
2,926,909

 
$
2,920,070

 
$
2,979,956

 
$
3,283,424

 
(1) Debt includes secured loans, notes payable, and credit agreements, including unamortized premium or net of unamortized discount and unamortized debt issuance costs.


24



Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes thereto. Historical results and percentage relationships set forth in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and contained in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes, including trends which might appear, should not be taken as indicative of future operations.

Executive Summary
Our Company
Brixmor Property Group Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, “BPG”) is an internally-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Brixmor Operating Partnership LP and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Operating Partnership”) is the entity through which BPG conducts substantially all of its operations and owns substantially all of its assets. BPG owns 100% of the common stock of BPG Subsidiary Inc. (“BPG Sub”), which, in turn, is the sole member of Brixmor OP GP LLC (the “General Partner”), the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. Unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us,” and “our” as used herein refer to each of BPG and the Operating Partnership, collectively. We believe we own and operate one of the largest open air retail portfolios by gross leasable area (“GLA”) in the United States, comprised primarily of community and neighborhood shopping centers. As of December 31, 2017, our portfolio consisted of 486 shopping centers (the “Portfolio”) with approximately 83 million square feet of GLA. In addition, we have one land parcel currently under development. Our high quality national Portfolio is primarily located within established trade areas in the top 50 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (“MSAs”), and our shopping centers are primarily anchored by non-discretionary and value-oriented retailers, as well as consumer-oriented service providers. Our three largest tenants by annualized base rent are The TJX Companies, Inc., The Kroger Co., and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. BPG has been organized and operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the United States federal income tax laws, commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2011, and has maintained such requirements through our taxable year ended December 31, 2017, and expects to satisfy such requirements for subsequent taxable years.

Our primary objective is to maximize total returns to our stockholders through consistent, sustainable growth in cash flow. We seek to achieve this objective through proactive management and accretive reinvestment in our existing Portfolio of high-quality open air shopping centers and through disciplined capital recycling activity focused on maximizing asset value and achieving critical mass in attractive retail submarkets. Our key strategies to achieve growth in cash flow include driving internal growth, pursuing value-enhancing reinvestment opportunities and prudently executing on acquisition and disposition activity, while also maintaining a flexible capital structure positioned for growth.

We believe the following set of competitive advantages positions us to successfully execute on our key strategies:

Expansive Retailer Relationships – We believe that the scale of our asset base and our nationwide footprint, represent a competitive advantage in supporting the growth objectives of the nation’s largest retailers. We believe that we are one of the largest landlords by GLA to TJX Companies and Kroger, as well as a key landlord to most major grocers and major retail category leaders. We believe that our strong relationships with leading retailers afford us insight into their strategies and priority access to their expansion plans.

Fully-Integrated Operating Platform – We manage a fully-integrated operating platform, leveraging our national scope and demonstrating our commitment to operating with a strong regional and local presence. We provide our tenants with dedicated service through both our national accounts leasing team based in New York and our network of four regional offices in Atlanta, Chicago, Philadelphia and San Diego, as well as 11 leasing and property management satellite offices throughout the country. We believe that this structure enables us to obtain critical market intelligence and to benefit from the regional and local expertise of our workforce.

Experienced Management – Senior members of our management team are seasoned real estate operators with public company leadership experience.  Our management team has deep industry knowledge and extensive, well-established relationships with retailers, brokers and vendors through many years of transactional experience, as well as significant expertise in executing value-enhancing reinvestment opportunities.


25



Other Factors That May Influence our Future Results
We derive our revenues primarily from rent and expense reimbursements paid by tenants to us under existing leases at each of our properties. Expense reimbursements primarily consist of payments made by tenants to us under contractual lease obligations for their proportional share of a property’s operating costs, insurance and real estate taxes and certain capital expenditures related to maintenance of the properties.

The amount of revenue we receive is primarily dependent on our ability to maintain or increase rental rates, renew expiring leases and/or lease available space. Factors that could affect our rental income include: (1) changes in national, regional or local economic climates; (2) local market conditions, including an oversupply of space in, or a reduction in demand for, properties similar to those in our Portfolio; (3) changes in market rental rates; (4) changes in the regional demographics of our properties; (5) competition from other available properties and the attractiveness of properties in our Portfolio to our tenants; (6) the financial stability of tenants, including the ability of tenants to pay rent and expense reimbursements; and (7) in the case of percentage rents, the sales volume of our tenants.

Our operating costs represent property-related costs, such as repairs and maintenance, landscaping, snow removal, utilities, property insurance, security, ground rent related to properties for which we are the lessee and various other property related costs. Increases in our operating costs, to the extent they are not offset by revenue increases, may impact our overall performance. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could impact our future results, performance or transactions, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”

Leasing Highlights
As of December 31, 2017, billed and leased occupancy was 90.3% and 92.2%, respectively, as compared to 90.7% and 92.8%, respectively, as of December 31, 2016. In addition, the following table summarizes our executed leasing activity for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands, except for per square foot (“PSF”) amounts):
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
Leases
 
GLA
 
New ABR PSF
 
Rent Spread(1)
 
Tenant Improvements and Allowances PSF(2)
 
Third Party Leasing Commissions PSF
New, renewal and option leases
1,894

 
11,898,523

 
$
14.48

 
12.6
%
 
$
7.34

 
$
1.10

New and renewal leases
1,605

 
8,129,836

 
15.44

 
15.5
%
 
10.73

 
1.61

New leases
618

 
3,195,154

 
16.00

 
34.1
%
 
22.26

 
3.97

Renewal leases
987

 
4,934,682

 
15.08

 
9.8
%
 
3.27

 
0.08

Option leases
289

 
3,768,687

 
12.41

 
7.2
%
 
0.02

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
Leases
 
GLA
 
New ABR PSF
 
Rent Spread(1)
 
Tenant Improvements and Allowances PSF(2)
 
Third Party Leasing Commissions PSF
New, renewal and option leases
2,017

 
13,683,327

 
$
12.90

 
12.0
%
 
$
5.39

 
$
0.85

New and renewal leases
1,665

 
7,879,398

 
14.82

 
16.5
%
 
9.36

 
1.48

New leases
697

 
3,385,418

 
15.07

 
31.3
%
 
19.71

 
3.35

Renewal leases
968

 
4,493,980

 
14.63

 
11.5
%
 
1.57

 
0.07

Option leases
352

 
5,803,929

 
10.30

 
6.0
%
 
0.01

 

(1) 
Based on comparable leases only.
(2) 
Includes tenant specific landlord work.
Includes new development property. Excludes leases executed for terms of less than one year.
ABR PSF includes the GLA of lessee owned leasehold improvements.

Acquisition Activity
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we acquired four shopping centers, one building, two outparcel buildings and two outparcels for $190.5 million.


26



During the year ended December 31, 2016, we acquired one shopping center, one building, two land parcels and one outparcel building for $48.0 million.

Disposition Activity
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we disposed of 29 wholly owned shopping centers and two outparcel buildings for net proceeds of $330.8 million resulting in an aggregate gain of $68.7 million and aggregate impairment of $22.9 million. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, we disposed of our unconsolidated joint venture interest for net proceeds of $12.4 million resulting in a gain of $4.6 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we disposed of six shopping centers, one office building and one outparcel building for net proceeds of $102.9 million resulting in an aggregate gain of $35.6 million and aggregate impairment of $2.0 million.

Results of Operations
The results of operations discussion is combined for BPG and the Operating Partnership because there are no material differences in the results of operations between the two reporting entities.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2017 to the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Revenues (in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
$ Change
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
997,089

 
$
998,118

 
$
(1,029
)
Expense reimbursements
278,636

 
270,548

 
8,088

Other revenues
7,455

 
7,106

 
349

Total revenues
$
1,283,180

 
$
1,275,772

 
$
7,408


Rental income
The decrease in rental income for the year ended December 31, 2017, of $1.0 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016, was primarily due to (i) a $9.3 million decrease in above and below market lease accretion and tenant inducements, net; and (ii) a $6.4 million decrease in lease settlement income; partially offset by (iii) a $10.5 million increase in base rent; and (iv) a $4.0 million increase in straight-line rent. The base rent increase was driven primarily by contractual rent increases as well as positive rent spreads for new and renewal leases and option exercises of 12.6% and 12.0% during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, partially offset by a decline in occupancy.

Expense reimbursements
The increase in expense reimbursements for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $8.1 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016, was primarily due to an increase in reimbursable real estate taxes and operating costs.

Other revenues
Other revenues remained generally consistent for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the corresponding period in 2016.










27



Operating Expenses (in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
$ Change
Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
Operating costs
$
136,092

 
$
133,429

 
$
2,663

Real estate taxes
179,097

 
174,487

 
4,610

Depreciation and amortization
375,028

 
387,302

 
(12,274
)
Provision for doubtful accounts
5,323

 
9,182

 
(3,859
)
Impairment of real estate assets
40,104

 
5,154

 
34,950

General and administrative
92,247

 
92,248

 
(1
)
Total operating expenses
$
827,891

 
$
801,802

 
$
26,089


Operating costs
The increase in operating costs for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $2.7 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016, was primarily due to an increase in repair and maintenance costs.

Real estate taxes
The increase in real estate taxes for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $4.6 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016, was primarily due to increased tax rates and assessments from several jurisdictions.

Depreciation and amortization
The decrease in depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $12.3 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016, was primarily due to the continued decrease in acquired in-place lease intangibles.

Provision for doubtful accounts
The decrease in the provision for doubtful accounts for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $3.9 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016, was primarily due to increased recoveries of previously reserved receivables and overall strength in collection efforts.

Impairment of real estate assets
During the year ended December 31, 2017, aggregate impairment of $40.1 million was recognized on 11 shopping centers as a result of disposition activity and five operating properties as a result of a change in the estimated hold period of these properties in connection with our capital recycling program. During the year ended December 31, 2016, aggregate impairment of $5.2 million was recognized on one shopping center and one office building as a result of disposition activity and two operating properties as a result of a change in the estimated hold period of these properties in connection with our capital recycling program.

General and administrative
General and administrative costs remained generally consistent for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the corresponding period in 2016, with decreased severance expenses associated with the separation of former executives of the Company in 2016, partially offset by increased payroll expenses.

During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, construction compensation costs of $8.1 million and $6.6 million, respectively, were capitalized to building and improvements and leasing compensation costs of $14.2 million and $14.5 million, respectively, were capitalized to deferred charges and prepaid expenses, net.







28



Other Income and Expenses (in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
$ Change
Other income (expense)
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends and interest
$
365

 
$
542

 
$
(177
)
Interest expense
(226,660
)
 
(226,671
)
 
11

Gain on sale of real estate assets
68,847

 
35,613

 
33,234

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, net
498

 
(832
)
 
1,330

Other
(2,907
)
 
(4,957
)
 
2,050

        Total other expense
$
(159,857
)
 
$
(196,305
)
 
$
36,448


Dividends and interest
The decrease in dividend and interest for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $0.2 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016, was primarily due to interest income recognized in 2016 in connection with a tax refund.

Interest expense
Interest expense remained generally consistent for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the corresponding period in 2016. Debt obligations refinanced at lower rates and decreased debt obligations during 2017 were partially offset by a decrease in debt premium amortization, net of discounts.

Gain (loss) on the sale of real estate assets
During the year ended December 31, 2017, 18 of the shopping centers and the two outparcel buildings that were disposed for net proceeds of $283.7 million resulted in an aggregate gain of $68.7 million. During the year ended December 31, 2016, five of the shopping centers and the one outparcel building that were disposed for net proceeds of $93.8 million resulted in an aggregate gain of $35.6 million.

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, net
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we repaid $389.1 million of secured loans and $815.0 million of an unsecured term loan under our senior unsecured credit facility agreement, as amended July 25, 2016, (the “Unsecured Credit Facility”), resulting in a $0.5 million gain on extinguishment of debt, net. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we repaid $892.4 million of secured loans, resulting in a $1.7 million gain on extinguishment of debt. In addition, we recognized a $2.5 million loss on extinguishment of debt in connection with the execution of the Unsecured Credit Facility.

Other
The decrease in other expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $2.1 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016, was primarily due to a decrease in shareholder equity offering expenses and a decrease in tenant litigation settlement expenses.

Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures (in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
$ Change
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint venture
$
381

 
$
477

 
$
(96
)
Gain on disposition of unconsolidated joint venture interest
4,556

 

 
4,556


Equity in income of unconsolidated joint venture
The decrease in equity in income of unconsolidated joint venture for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $0.1 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016, was primarily due to the disposition of our unconsolidated joint venture interest during the year ended December 31, 2017.

29



Gain on disposition of unconsolidated joint venture interest
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we disposed of our unconsolidated joint venture interest for net proceeds of $12.4 million resulting in a gain of $4.6 million.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2016 to the Year Ended December 31, 2015
Revenues (in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
$ Change
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
998,118

 
$
984,548

 
$
13,570

Expense reimbursements
270,548

 
276,032

 
(5,484
)
Other revenues
7,106

 
5,400

 
1,706

Total revenues
$
1,275,772

 
$
1,265,980

 
$
9,792


Rental income
The increase in rental income for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $13.6 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015, was primarily due to (i) a $20.2 million increase in base rent and (ii) a $9.4 million increase in lease settlement income primarily from a former bankrupt tenant, partially offset by (iii) a $10.0 million decrease in accretion income from above and below market lease intangibles, (iv) a $3.2 million decrease in straight-line rent and (v) a $0.9 million increase in amortization of tenant inducements. The base rent increase was driven primarily by contractual rent increases as well as positive rent spreads for new and renewal leases and option exercises of 12.0% and 14.9% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Expense reimbursements
The decrease in expense reimbursements for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $5.5 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015, was primarily due to a decrease in reimbursable real estate tax expenses as a result of annual real estate tax reconciliations and the receipt of tax refunds.

Other revenues
The increase in other revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $1.7 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015, was primarily due to an increase of $2.3 million in percentage rents, partially offset by a reduction in management fees as a result of fewer properties being managed. The increase in percentage rents was primarily due to the timing of recognition.

Operating Expenses (in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
$ Change
Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
Operating costs
$
133,429

 
$
129,477

 
$
3,952

Real estate taxes
174,487

 
180,911

 
(6,424
)
Depreciation and amortization
387,302

 
417,935

 
(30,633
)
Provision for doubtful accounts
9,182

 
9,540

 
(358
)
Impairment of real estate assets
5,154

 
1,005

 
4,149

General and administrative
92,248

 
98,454

 
(6,206
)
Total operating expenses
$
801,802

 
$
837,322

 
$
(35,520
)

Operating costs
The increase in operating costs for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $4.0 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015, was primarily due to an increase in repair and maintenance costs and insurance expenses, partially offset by a decrease in utility expenses.

30



Real estate taxes
The decrease in real estate taxes for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $6.4 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015, was primarily due to annual real estate tax reconciliations and the receipt of tax refunds.

Depreciation and amortization
The decrease in depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $30.6 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015, was primarily due to the continued decrease in acquired in-place lease intangibles.

Provision for doubtful accounts
The decrease in provision for doubtful accounts for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $0.4 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015, was primarily due to an increase in recoveries of amounts previously written off.

Impairment of real estate assets
During the year ended December 31, 2016, aggregate impairment of $5.2 million was recognized on one shopping center and one office building as a result of disposition activity and two operating properties as a result of a change in the estimated hold period of these properties in connection with our capital recycling program. During the year ended December 31, 2015, aggregate impairment of $1.0 million was recognized on one shopping center and one outparcel as a result of disposition activity in connection with our capital recycling program.

General and administrative
The decrease in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $6.2 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015, was primarily due to (i) $9.9 million of expense associated with the vesting of certain pre-IPO equity awards in 2015 and (ii) a decrease in corporate office rent, partially offset by (iii) increased expenses associated with the Audit Committee review and (iv) 2016 severance expenses associated with former executives of BPG as well as expenses associated with the interim and new executive team.

During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, construction compensation costs of $6.6 million and $6.3 million, respectively, were capitalized to building and improvements and leasing compensation costs of $14.5 million and $15.1 million, respectively, were capitalized to deferred charges and prepaid expenses, net.

Other Income and Expenses (in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
$ Change
Other income (expense)
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends and interest
$
542

 
$
315

 
$
227

Interest expense
(226,671
)
 
(245,012
)
 
18,341

Gain on sale of real estate assets
35,613

 
11,744

 
23,869

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, net
(832
)
 
1,720

 
(2,552
)
Other
(4,957
)
 
(348
)
 
(4,609
)
        Total other expense
$
(196,305
)
 
$
(231,581
)
 
$
35,276


Dividends and interest
The increase in dividends and interest for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $0.2 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015, was primarily due to interest income recognized in 2016 in connection with a tax refund.

Interest expense
The decrease in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $18.3 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015, was primarily due to the 2016 and 2015 secured loan and unsecured note repayments

31



of $2.0 billion with a weighted-average interest rate of 5.70%, partially offset by the issuance of $2.3 billion of senior unsecured notes with a weighted average interest rate of 3.80%. The balance on the $1.25 billion revolving facility component of the Unsecured Credit Facility decreased by $397.5 million during 2015 and 2016 from a balance of $519.5 million on January 1, 2015 to $122.0 million at December 31, 2016.

Gain on sale of real estate assets
During the year ended December 31, 2016, five of the shopping centers and one outparcel building that were disposed for net proceeds of $93.8 million resulted in an aggregate gain of $35.6 million. During the year ended December 31, 2015, four of the shopping centers and two of the outparcel buildings that were disposed for net proceeds of $40.4 million resulted in an aggregate gain of $11.7 million.

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, net
During the year ended December 31, 2016, we repaid $892.4 million of secured loans, resulting in a $1.7 million gain on extinguishment of debt. In addition, we recognized a $2.5 million loss on extinguishment of debt in connection with the execution of the Unsecured Credit Facility. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we repaid $868.9 million of secured loans and $225.0 million of unsecured notes, resulting in a $1.7 million gain on extinguishment of debt, net.

Other
The increase in other expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $4.6 million, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015, was primarily due to (i) $4.7 million of income in 2015 related to net adjustments to pre-IPO tax reserves and receivables; (ii) $1.8 million of income in 2015 related to the resolution of an environmental contingency; (iii) $0.8 million of income in 2015 related to the resolution of certain contingencies for disposed properties; partially offset by (v) a $1.8 million decrease in transaction expenses.

Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures (in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
$ Change
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
$
477

 
$
459

 
$
18


Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures remained generally consistent for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the corresponding period in 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
We anticipate that our cash flows from the sources listed below will provide adequate capital for the next 12 months for all anticipated uses, including all scheduled principal and interest payments on our outstanding indebtedness, current and anticipated tenant and other capital improvements, stockholder distributions to maintain our qualification as a REIT and other obligations associated with conducting our business.

Our primary expected sources and uses of capital are as follows:
Sources
cash and cash equivalent balances;
operating cash flow;
available borrowings under our existing Unsecured Credit Facility;
issuance of long-term debt;
dispositions; and
issuance of equity securities.
Uses
recurring maintenance capital expenditures;

32



leasing related capital expenditures;
anchor space repositioning, redevelopment and development projects;
debt maturities and repayment requirements;
acquisitions;
dividend/distribution payments; and
repurchase of equity securities.

We believe our current capital structure provides us with the financial flexibility and capacity to fund our current capital needs as well as future growth opportunities. We have access to multiple forms of capital, including secured property level debt, unsecured corporate level debt, preferred equity, and common equity, which will allow us to efficiently execute on our strategic and operational objectives. We currently have investment grade credit ratings from all three major credit rating agencies. As of December 31, 2017, our revolving credit facility was undrawn providing for $1.25 billion of liquidity. We intend to continue to enhance our financial and operational flexibility through laddering and extending the duration of our debt, and further expanding our unencumbered asset base.

In March 2017, the Operating Partnership issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.90% Senior Notes due 2027 (the “2027 Notes”), the proceeds of which were utilized to repay outstanding indebtedness, including borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility and for general corporate purposes.  The 2027 Notes bear interest at a rate of 3.90% per annum, payable semi-annually on September 15 and March 15 of each year, commencing September 15, 2017. The 2027 Notes will mature on March 15, 2027.

In June 2017, the Operating Partnership issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.65% Senior Notes due 2024 (the “2024 Notes”), the proceeds of which were utilized to repay outstanding indebtedness, including borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility and for general corporate purposes.  The 2024 Notes bear interest at a rate of 3.65% per annum, payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing December 15, 2017. The 2024 Notes will mature on June 15, 2024.

In July 2017, the Operating Partnership entered into a $300.0 million variable rate unsecured term loan facility (the “$300 Million Term Loan”). The term loan facility has a seven-year term maturing on July 26, 2024, with no available extension options, and will bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 190 basis points (based on the Operating Partnership’s current credit ratings). Proceeds from the $300 Million Term Loan were used to prepay $300.0 million of an unsecured term loan under the Company’s Unsecured Credit Facility maturing July 31, 2018.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we repaid a total of $815.0 million of unsecured term loan debt under our Unsecured Credit Facility and $389.1 million of secured loans, resulting in a $0.5 million gain on extinguishment of debt, net. These repayments were funded primarily with proceeds from the issuance of the 2027 Notes and 2024 Notes and the execution of the $300 Million Term Loan.

In December 2017, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program for up to $400.0 million of the Company’s common stock. The program is scheduled to expire on December 5, 2019, unless extended by the Board of Directors. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repurchased approximately 0.3 million shares of common stock under the program at an average price per share of $17.96 for a total of approximately $5.9 million.

In connection with our intention to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we expect to continue paying regular dividends to our stockholders. Our Board of Directors will continue to evaluate the dividend policy on a quarterly basis, evaluating sources and uses of capital and operating fundamentals among other things.  We generally intend to maintain a conservative dividend payout ratio, reserving such amounts as the Board of Directors considers necessary for reinvestment in our Portfolio, debt reduction, acquisitions of new properties, share repurchases, other investments as suitable opportunities arise, and such other factors as the Board of Directors considers appropriate. Cash dividends paid to common stockholders and OP Unitholders for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $317.5 million and $298.8 million, respectively.  Our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.275 per common share in October 2017 for the fourth quarter of 2017. The dividend was paid on January 16, 2018 to shareholders of record on January 4, 2018. Our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.275 per common share in February 2018 for the first quarter of 2018. The dividend is payable on April 16, 2018 to shareholders of record on April 5, 2018.


33



Our cash flow activities are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Cash flows provided by operating activities
 
$
551,941

 
$
567,467

 
$
523,998

Cash flows used in investing activities
 
(52,874
)
 
(141,881
)
 
(190,743
)
Cash flows used in financing activities
 
(491,159
)
 
(433,707
)
 
(336,024
)

Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Cash flows provided by operating activities
 
$
551,941

 
$
567,467

 
$
523,998

Cash flows used in investing activities
 
(52,872
)
 
(141,873
)
 
(190,740
)
Cash flows used in financing activities
 
(491,157
)
 
(433,727
)
 
(335,904
)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash for BPG were $110.8 million and $102.9 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash for the Operating Partnership were $110.7 million and $102.8 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities primarily consist of cash inflows from tenant rental payments and expense reimbursements and cash outflows for property operating costs, real estate taxes, general and administrative expenses and interest.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, our net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $15.5 million as compared to the corresponding period in 2016. The decrease is primarily due to (i) a decrease in net working capital, (ii) a decrease in lease settlement income, and (iii) an increase in cash outflows for general and administrative expense, partially offset by (iv) an increase in net operating income and (v) a decrease in cash outflows for interest expense.

Investing Activities
Net cash flow used in investing activities is impacted by the nature, timing and extent of improvements and investments in our shopping centers, including capital expenditures associated with leasing and redevelopment efforts and our acquisition and disposition programs. Capital used to fund these activities, and the source thereof, can vary significantly from period to period based on the volume and timing of these activities.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, our net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $89.0 million as compared to the corresponding period in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to (i) an increase of $240.2 million in proceeds from sales of real estate assets and unconsolidated joint venture interest, partially offset by (ii) an increase of $143.7 million in acquisitions of real estate assets, and (iii) an increase of $10.4 million in improvements to and investments in real estate assets.

Improvements to and investments in real estate assets
During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we expended $202.9 million and $192.4 million, respectively, on improvements to and investments in real estate assets.

Maintenance capital expenditures represent costs to fund major replacements and betterments to our properties. Leasing related capital expenditures represent tenant specific costs incurred to lease space including tenant improvements and tenant allowances. In addition, we evaluate our Portfolio on an ongoing basis to identify value-enhancing anchor space repositioning, redevelopment and development opportunities. Such initiatives are tenant driven and focus on upgrading our centers with strong, best-in-class retailers and enhancing the overall merchandise

34



mix and tenant quality of our Portfolio. As of December 31, 2017, we had 47 projects in process with an aggregate anticipated cost of $294.9 million, of which $112.1 million has been incurred to date.

Acquisitions of and proceeds from sales of real estate assets
We continue to evaluate the market for available properties and may acquire shopping centers when we believe strategic opportunities exist, particularly where we can enhance our concentration in attractive retail submarkets and the long-term growth rate of our Portfolio. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we acquired four shopping centers, one building, two outparcel buildings and two outparcels for an aggregate purchase price, including transaction costs, of $190.5 million.

We may also dispose of properties when we feel growth has been maximized or the assets are no longer a strategic fit for our Portfolio. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we disposed of 29 wholly owned shopping centers and two outparcel buildings for net proceeds of $330.8 million. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, we disposed of our sole unconsolidated joint venture interest for net proceeds of $12.4 million.

Financing Activities
Net cash flow used in financing activities is impacted by the nature, timing and extent of issuances of debt and equity securities, as well as principal and other payments associated with our outstanding indebtedness.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, our net cash used in financing activities increased $57.5 million as compared to the corresponding period in 2016. The increase was primarily due to (i) a $38.8 million increase in debt repayments, net of borrowings, (ii) an increase of $19.2 million in distributions to common stock holders, partners and non-controlling interests, and (iii) an increase of $5.9 million in repurchases of common stock, partially offset by (iv) a decrease of $6.5 million in deferred financing costs.

Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations relate to our debt, including secured loans, unsecured notes payable and unsecured credit facilities, with maturities ranging from one year to 12 years, in addition to non-cancelable operating leases pertaining to shopping centers where we are the lessee and to our corporate offices.

The following table summarizes our debt maturities (excluding extension options), interest payment obligations (excluding debt premiums and discounts and deferred financing costs) and obligations under non-cancelable operating leases (excluding extension options) as of December 31, 2017:
Contractual Obligations
(in thousands)
 
Payment due by period
 
 
2018
 
2019
 
2020
 
2021
 
2022
 
Thereafter
 
Total
Debt(1)
 
$
203,118

 
$
618,679

 
$
672,695

 
$
686,225

 
$
500,000

 
$
3,025,453

 
$
5,706,170

Interest payments(2)
 
215,686

 
201,526

 
187,060

 
140,010

 
131,991

 
289,559

 
1,165,832

Operating leases
 
7,092

 
7,010

 
7,027

 
7,231

 
7,215

 
71,860

 
107,435

Total
 
$
425,896

 
$
827,215

 
$
866,782

 
$
833,466

 
$
639,206

 
$
3,386,872

 
$
6,979,437

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) 
Debt includes scheduled principal amortization and maturities for secured loans, unsecured credit facilities and unsecured notes payable.
(2) 
As of December 31, 2017, we incur variable rate interest on (i) $185.0 million of a term loan under our Unsecured Credit Facility; (ii) a $500.0 million term loan under our Unsecured Credit Facility; (iii) a $600.0 million term loan under our $600 Million Term Loan, and (iv) a $300 million term loan under our $300 Million Term Loan. Additionally, we have in-place nine interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional value of $1.4 billion, which effectively convert a portion of the variable interest payments to fixed interest payments. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could impact interest payments please see Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures.” Interest payments for these variable rate loans are presented using rates (including the impact of interest rate swaps) as of December 31, 2017.

Non-GAAP Disclosures
We present the non-GAAP performance measures set forth below. These measures should not be considered as alternatives to, or more meaningful than, net income (presented in accordance with GAAP) or other GAAP financial measures, as an indicator of financial performance and are not alternatives to, or more meaningful than, cash flow from operating activities (presented in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of liquidity. Non-GAAP performance

35



measures have limitations as they do not include all items of income and expense that affect operations, and accordingly, should always be considered as supplemental financial results to those presented in accordance with GAAP. Our computation of these non-GAAP measures may differ in certain respects from the methodology utilized by other REITs and, therefore, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by such other REITs. Investors are cautioned that items excluded from these non-GAAP measures are relevant to understanding and addressing financial performance.

Funds From Operations
NAREIT FFO is a supplemental non-GAAP performance measure utilized to evaluate the operating performance of real estate companies. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines FFO as net income (loss) presented in accordance with GAAP excluding (i) gain (loss) on disposition of operating properties, and (ii) extraordinary items, plus (iii) depreciation and amortization of operating properties, (iv) impairment of operating properties and real estate equity investments, and (v) after adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis.

We believe NAREIT FFO assists investors in analyzing our comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains and losses related to dispositions of previously depreciated operating properties, real estate-related depreciation and amortization of continuing operations, impairment of operating properties and real estate equity investments, extraordinary items, and after adjustments for joint ventures calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis, investors can compare the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods.

Our reconciliation of BPG’s net income to NAREIT FFO for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):  
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Net income
$
300,369

 
$
278,142

 
$
197,536

Gain on disposition of operating properties
(68,847
)
 
(35,613
)
 
(11,744
)
Gain on disposition of unconsolidated joint venture interest
(4,556
)
 

 

Depreciation and amortization-real estate related-continuing operations
371,255

 
384,187

 
413,470

Depreciation and amortization-real estate related-unconsolidated joint venture
56

 
88

 
85

Impairment of operating properties
40,104

 
5,154

 
807

NAREIT FFO
$
638,381

 
$
631,958

 
$
600,154

NAREIT FFO per share/OP Unit  diluted
$
2.09

 
$
2.07

 
$
1.97

Weighted average shares/OP Units outstanding  basic and diluted(1)
305,281

 
305,059

 
305,023

 

(1)
Basic and diluted shares/OP Units outstanding reflects an assumed conversion of vested OP Units to common stock of the Company and the vesting of certain equity awards.

Same Property Net Operating Income
Same Property Net Operating Income (“NOI”) is a supplemental, non-GAAP performance measure utilized to evaluate the operating performance of real estate companies. Same property NOI is calculated (using properties owned for the entirety of both periods and excluding properties under development), as total property revenues (base rent, ancillary and other, expense reimbursements, and percentage rents) less direct property operating expenses (operating costs, real estate taxes and provision for doubtful accounts). Same property NOI excludes corporate level income (including management, transaction, and other fees), lease termination fees, straight-line rental income, amortization of above- and below-market rent and tenant inducements, straight-line ground rent expense, and income / expense associated with the Company’s captive insurance company.

We believe Same Property NOI assists investors in analyzing our comparative operating and financial performance because it eliminates disparities in NOI due to the acquisition, disposition or stabilization of development properties during the period presented, and therefore provides a more consistent metric for comparing the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods.



36



Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2017 to the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of properties
479

 
479

 

Percent billed
90.3
%
 
90.7
%
 
(0.4
%)
Percent leased
92.2
%
 
92.9
%
 
(0.7
%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
Base rent
$
895,447

 
$
877,117

 
$
18,330

 
Ancillary and other
15,804

 
15,599

 
205

 
Expense reimbursements
268,690

 
259,261

 
9,429

 
Percentage rents
7,023

 
5,711

 
1,312

 
 
 
 
1,186,964

 
1,157,688

 
29,276

Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating costs
(134,172
)
 
(128,027
)
 
(6,145
)
 
Real estate taxes
(172,644
)
 
(167,796
)
 
(4,848
)
 
Provision for doubtful accounts
(4,809
)
 
(8,780
)
 
3,971

 
 
 
 
(311,625
)
 
(304,603
)
 
(7,022
)
Same property NOI
$
875,339

 
$
853,085

 
$
22,254

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOI margin
73.7
%
 
73.7
%
 
 
Expense recovery ratio
87.6
%
 
87.6
%
 
 

The following table provides a reconciliation of Net income attributable to common stockholders to Same Property NOI for the periods presented (in thousands):
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
300,254

 
$
275,478

Adjustments:
 
 
 
Non-same property NOI
(34,705
)
 
(41,320
)
Lease termination fees
(6,542
)
 
(12,920
)
Straight-line rental income, net
(18,451
)
 
(14,444
)
Amortization of above- and below-market rent and tenant inducements, net
(27,445
)
 
(36,719
)
Fee income
(320
)
 
(1,221
)
Straight-line ground rent expense
134

 
1,035

Depreciation and amortization
375,028

 
387,302

Impairment of real estate assets
40,104

 
5,154

General and administrative
92,247

 
92,248

Total other expense
159,857

 
196,305

Equity in income of unconsolidated joint venture
(381
)
 
(477
)
Gain on disposition of unconsolidated joint venture interest
(4,556
)
 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
76

 
2,514

Preferred stock dividends
39

 
150

Same property NOI
$
875,339

 
$
853,085


Our Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of the historical financial condition and results of operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could ultimately differ from those estimates. For a discussion of recently-issued and adopted accounting standards, see Note 1 to financial statements contained elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.


37



Revenue Recognition and Receivables
Rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases.  The cumulative difference between rental revenue recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and contractual payment terms is recorded as deferred rent and presented on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets within Receivables, net. 

The Company commences recognizing rental revenue based on an evaluation of a number of factors. In most cases, revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset.

Certain leases also provide for percentage rents based upon the level of sales achieved by a lessee.  These percentage rents are recognized upon the achievement of certain pre-determined sales levels. Leases also typically provide for reimbursement of common area expenses, real estate taxes and other operating expenses by the lessee and are recognized in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred. 

Gains from the sale of depreciated operating properties are generally recognized under the full accrual method, provided that various criteria relating to the terms of the sale and subsequent involvement by the Company with the applicable property are met.

The Company periodically evaluates the collectability of its receivables related to rental revenue, straight-line rent, expense reimbursements and those attributable to other revenue generating activities. The Company analyzes its receivables and historical bad debt levels, tenant credit-worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, tenants in bankruptcy are analyzed and estimates are made in connection with the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims.

Real Estate
Real estate assets are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Upon acquisition of real estate operating properties, management estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings, and tenant improvements), identifiable intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above and below-market leases, in-place leases and tenant relationships), and assumed debt based on an evaluation of available information. Based on these estimates, the estimated fair value is allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities.

The fair value of tangible assets is determined as if the acquired property is vacant. Fair value is determined using an exit price approach, which contemplates the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

In allocating fair value to identifiable intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired operating property, the value of above-market and below-market leases is estimated based on the present value (using a discount rate reflecting the risks associated with leases acquired) of the difference between: (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the leases negotiated and in-place at the time of acquisition and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the property or an equivalent property, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease, which includes renewal periods with fixed rental terms that are considered to be below-market. The capitalized above-market or below-market intangible is amortized as a reduction of, or increase to, rental income over the remaining non-cancelable term of each lease.

In determining the value of in-place leases and tenant relationships, management evaluates the specific characteristics of each lease and the Company’s overall relationship with each tenant. Factors considered include, but are not limited to: the nature of the existing relationship with a tenant, the credit risk associated with a tenant, expectations surrounding lease renewals, estimated carrying costs of a property during a hypothetical expected lease-up period, current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. Management also considers information obtained about a property in connection with its pre-acquisition due diligence. Estimated carrying costs include property operating costs, insurance, real estate taxes and estimates of lost rentals at market rates. Costs to execute similar leases include leasing commissions and legal costs to the extent that such costs are not already incurred with a new lease that has been negotiated in connection with the purchase of a property. The values assigned to in-place leases and tenant relationships are amortized to Depreciation and amortization expense over the remaining term of each lease.

38




Certain real estate assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
Building and building and land improvements
20 – 40 years
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
5 – 10 years
Tenant improvements
The shorter of the term of the related lease or useful life

Costs to fund major replacements and betterments, which extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their respective useful lives, while costs for ordinary repairs and maintenance activities are expensed to Operating costs as incurred.

When a real estate asset is identified by management as held-for-sale, the Company discontinues depreciation and estimates its sales price, net of estimated selling costs. If the estimated net sales price of an asset is less than its net carrying value, a loss is recognized to reflect the estimated fair value. Properties classified as real estate held-for-sale generally represent properties that are under contract for sale and are expected to close within 12 months.

On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are indicators, including property operating performance, changes in anticipated holding period and general market conditions, that the value of the Company’s real estate assets (including any related intangible assets or liabilities) may be impaired. If an indicator is identified, a real estate asset is considered impaired only if management’s estimate of current and projected operating cash flows (undiscounted and unleveraged), taking into account the anticipated and probability weighted holding period, are less than a real estate asset’s carrying value. Various factors are considered in the estimation process, including trends and prospects and the effects of demand, competition and other economic factors. Changes in any estimates and/or assumptions, including the anticipated holding period, could have a material impact on the projected operating cash flows. If management determines that the carrying value of a real estate asset is impaired, a loss is recognized for the excess of its carrying amount over its fair value.

In situations in which a lease or leases with a tenant have been, or are expected to be, terminated early, the Company evaluates the remaining useful lives of depreciable or amortizable assets in the asset group related to the lease that will be terminated (i.e., tenant improvements, above and below market lease intangibles, in-place lease value and leasing commissions). Based upon consideration of the facts and circumstances surrounding the termination, the Company may accelerate the depreciation and amortization associated with the asset group.

Stock Based Compensation
The Company accounts for equity awards in accordance with the FASB’s Stock Compensation guidance which requires that all share based payments to employees and non-employee directors be recognized in the statement of operations over the service period based on their fair value. Fair value is determined based on the type of award using either the grant date market price of the Company’s stock, the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model or a Monte Carlo simulation model. Share-based compensation expense is included in General and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Inflation
Inflation has been historically low and has had a minimal impact on the operating performance of our shopping centers; however, inflation may increase in the future. Most of our long-term leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation, including requirements for tenants to pay their share of operating costs, including common area expenses, real estate taxes and insurance, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in property-level costs resulting from inflation. In addition, we believe that many of our existing rental rates are below current market levels for comparable space and that upon renewal or re-leasing, such rates may be increased to be consistent with, or closer to, current market rates. In addition, with respect to our outstanding indebtedness, we periodically evaluate our exposure to interest rate fluctuations, and may enter into interest rate protection agreements which mitigate, but do not eliminate, the impact of changes in interest rates on our variable rate loans.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2017.

39



Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We may be exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of long-term debt used to fund operations and capital expenditures. Our objective in using interest rate derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To achieve our objectives we borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest spreads available.

With regard to variable rate financing, we assess interest rate risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. We maintain risk management control systems to monitor interest rate cash flow risk attributable to both our outstanding or forecasted debt obligations as well as our potential offsetting hedge positions. The risk management control systems involve the use of analytical techniques, including cash flow sensitivity analysis, to estimate the expected impact of changes in interest rates on our future cash flows.

We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates. To the extent we do, we are exposed to market and credit risk. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of the financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. The market risk associated with derivative instruments is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk to us. The credit risk associated with derivative instruments is managed by entering into transactions with highly-rated counterparties.

As of December 31, 2017, we had $1.6 billion of outstanding variable rate borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility, $600 Million Term Loan and $300 Million Term Loan which bore interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus a spread of 1.35%, 1.40% and 1.90%, respectively. We have interest rate swap agreements on $1.4 billion of our variable rate borrowings, which effectively convert the base rate on the borrowings from variable to fixed. If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt increased by 100 basis points, the increase in annual interest expense on our variable rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.9 million (after taking into account the impact of the $1.4 billion of interest rate swap agreements). If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt decreased by 100 basis points, the decrease in annual interest expense on our variable rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.9 million (after taking into account the impact of the $1.4 billion of interest rate swap agreements).

The table below presents the maturity profile, weighted average interest rates and fair value of total debt as of December 31, 2017. The table has limited predictive value as average interest rates for variable rate debt included in the table represent rates that existed as of December 31, 2017 and are subject to change. Further, the table below incorporates only those exposures that exist as of December 31, 2017 and does not consider exposures or positions that may have arisen or expired after that date. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, our hedging strategies at that time, and actual interest rates. 
(dollars in thousands)
 
2018
 
2019
 
2020
 
2021
 
2022
 
Thereafter
 
Total
 
Fair Value
Secured Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed rate
 
$
18,118

 
$
18,679

 
$
672,695

 
$
186,225

 
$

 
$
7,000

 
$
902,717

 
$
963,702

Weighted average interest rate(1)
 
6.16
%
 
6.16
%
 
6.17
%
 
4.40
%
 
4.40
%
 
4.40
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unsecured Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed rate
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
500,000

 
$
2,718,453

 
$
3,218,453

 
$
3,224,877

Weighted average interest rate(1)
 
3.81
%
 
3.81
%
 
3.81
%
 
3.81
%
 
3.79
%
 
3.79
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Variable rate(2) (3)
 
$
185,000

 
$
600,000

 
$

 
$
500,000

 
$

 
$
300,000

 
$
1,585,000

 
$
1,586,206

Weighted average interest rate(1)
 
2.50
%
 
2.68
%
 
2.68
%
 
3.05
%
 
3.05
%
 
3.05
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) 
Weighted average interest rates are on the debt balances as of the end of each year and assumes repayment of debt on its scheduled maturity date.





40



(2) 
Our variable rate debt is based on a credit rating grid. The credit rating grid and all-in-rate on outstanding variable rate debt as of December 31, 2017 is as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Credit Spread Grid
 
 
As of December 31, 2017
 
LIBOR Rate Loans
 
Base Rate Loans
Variable Rate Debt
 
LIBOR Rate
 
Credit Spread
 
All-in-Rate
 
Credit Spread
 
Facility Fee
 
Credit Spread
 
Facility Fee
Unsecured Credit Facility (term loans)
 
1.38%
 
1.35%
 
2.73%
 
0.90% – 1.75%
 
N/A
 
0.00% – 0.75%
 
N/A
Unsecured Credit Facility (Revolving Facility)
 
1.50%
 
1.20%
 
2.70%
 
0.88% – 1.55%
 
0.13% – 0.30%
 
0.00% – 0.55%
 
0.13% – 0.30%
$600 Million Term Loan
 
1.38%
 
1.40%
 
2.78%
 
0.95% – 1.95%
 
N/A
 
0.00% – 0.95%
 
N/A
$300 Million Term Loan
 
1.36%
 
1.90%
 
3.26%
 
1.50% – 2.45%
 
N/A
 
0.50% – 1.45%
 
N/A

(3) 
The Company has in place nine interest rate swaps agreements that convert the variable interest rates on portions of our variable rate debt to fixed rates. The balances subject to interest rates swaps as of December 31, 2017 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
 
As of December 31, 2017
Variable Rate Debt
 
Amount
 
Weighted Average Fixed LIBOR Rate
 
Credit Spread
 
Swapped All-in-Rate
Unsecured Credit Facility (term loans)
 
$
685,000

 
1.03%
 
1.35%
 
2.38%
$600 Million Term Loan
 
$
600,000

 
0.86%
 
1.40%
 
2.26%
$300 Million Term Loan
 
$
115,000

 
0.82%
 
1.90%
 
2.72%

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
See the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and financial statements commencing on page F-1.

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Controls and Procedures (Brixmor Property Group Inc.)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
BPG maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. BPG’s management, with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation BPG’s principal executive officer, James M. Taylor, and principal financial officer, Angela Aman, concluded that BPG’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
BPG’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of BPG’s financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. BPG’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of BPG’s assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of BPG are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of BPG; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of its assets that could have a material effect on BPG’s financial statements.


41



All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, BPG conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission. Based on its assessment and those criteria, BPG’s management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued a report, included herein, on the effectiveness of BPG’s internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in BPG’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, BPG’s internal control over financial reporting.

Controls and Procedures (Brixmor Operating Partnership LP)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Operating Partnership maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. The Operating Partnership’s management, with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation the Operating Partnership’s principal executive officer, James M. Taylor, and principal financial officer, Angela Aman, concluded that the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Operating Partnership’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Operating Partnership’s financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Operating Partnership’s assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Operating Partnership are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Operating Partnership; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of its assets that could have a material effect on the Operating Partnership’s financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Operating Partnership conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the

42



Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission. Based on its assessment and those criteria, the Operating Partnership’s management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued a report, included herein, on the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information
None.





43



PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by Item 10 will be included in the definitive proxy statement relating to the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Brixmor Property Group Inc. to be held on May 8, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference. Brixmor Property Group Inc. will file such definitive proxy statement with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s 2017 fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by Item 11 will be included in the definitive proxy statement relating to the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Brixmor Property Group Inc. to be held on May 8, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference. Brixmor Property Group Inc. will file such definitive proxy statement with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s 2017 fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by Item 12 will be included in the definitive proxy statement relating to the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Brixmor Property Group Inc. to be held on May 8, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference. Brixmor Property Group Inc. will file such definitive proxy statement with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s 2017 fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

Item 13.     Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by Item 13 will be included in the definitive proxy statement relating to the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Brixmor Property Group Inc. to be held on May 8, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference. Brixmor Property Group Inc. will file such definitive proxy statement with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s 2017 fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by Item 14 will be included in the definitive proxy statement relating to the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Brixmor Property Group Inc. to be held on May 8, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference. Brixmor Property Group Inc. will file such definitive proxy statement with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s 2017 fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.


44



PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Documents filed as part of this report
 
 
Form 10-K Page
1
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
 
 
 
 
 
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Brixmor Property Group Inc.:
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Brixmor Operating Partnership LP:
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Capital for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 
 
2
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
 
 
 
 
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
 
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
 
 
 
 
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
 




45



(b) Exhibits. The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report:
 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
File No.
 
Date of
Filing
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Articles of Incorporation of Brixmor Property Group Inc., dated as of November 4, 2013
 
8-K
 
001-36160
 
11/4/2013
 
3.1
 
 
 
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Brixmor Property Group Inc., dated as of February 28, 2017
 
8-K
 
001-36160
 
3/3/2017
 
3.1
 
 
 
Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
 
10-K
 
001-36160
 
3/12/2014
 
10.7
 
 
 
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, dated as of October 29, 2013, by and between Brixmor OP GP LLC, as General Partner, BPG Subsidiary Inc., as Special Limited Partner, and the other limited partners from time to time party thereto
 
8-K
 
001-36160
 
11/4/2013
 
10.1
 
 
 
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, dated as of October 29, 2013, by and between Brixmor OP GP LLC, as General Partner, and the limited partners from time to time party thereto
 
8-K
 
001-36160
 
11/4/2013
 
10.2
 
 
 
Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, dated as of March 11, 2014
 
8-K
 
001-36160
 
3/14/2014
 
10.1
 
 
 
Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, dated as of March 28, 2014
 
8-K
 
001-36160
 
4/3/2014
 
10.1
 
 
 
Indenture, dated January 21, 2015, between Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, as issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee.
 
8-K
 
001-36160
 
1/21/2015
 
4.1
 
 
 
First Supplemental Indenture, dated January 21, 2015, among Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, as issuer, and Brixmor OP GP LLC and BPG Subsidiary Inc., as possible future guarantors, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee.
 
8-K
 
001-36160
 
1/21/2015
 
4.2
 
 
 
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated August 10, 2015, among Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, as issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee.
 
8-K
 
00-36160
 
8/10/2015
 
4.2
 
 
 
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated June 13, 2016, among Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, as issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee.
 
8-K
 
00-36160
 
6/13/2016
 
4.2
 
 

46



 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
File No.
 
Date of
Filing
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 24, 2016, among Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, as issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee.
 
8-K
 
00-36160
 
8/24/2016
 
4.2
 
 
 
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 8, 2017, among Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, as issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee.
 
8-K
 
00-36160
 
3/8/2017
 
4.2
 
 
 
Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated June 5, 2017, among Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, as issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee.
 
8-K
 
00-36160
 
6/5/2017
 
4.2
 
 
 
Indenture, dated as of March 29, 1995, between New Plan Realty Trust and The First National Bank of Boston, as Trustee (the “1995 Indenture”)
 
S-3
 
33-61383
 
7/28/1995
 
4.2
 
 
 
First Supplemental Indenture to the 1995 Indenture, dated as of August 5, 1999, by and among New Plan Realty Trust, New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust Company
 
10-Q
 
001-12244
 
11/12/1999
 
10.2
 
 
 
Successor Supplemental Indenture to the 1995 Indenture, dated as of April 20, 2007, by and among Super IntermediateCo LLC and U.S. Bank Trust National Association
 
10-Q
 
001-12244
 
8/9/2007
 
4.2
 
 
 
Third Supplemental Indenture to the 1995 Indenture, dated as of October 30, 2009, by and among Centro NP LLC and U.S. Bank Trust National Association
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
8/23/2013
 
4.4
 
 
 
Supplemental Indenture to the 1995 Indenture, dated as of October 16, 2014, between Brixmor LLC and U.S. Bank Trust National Association
 
8-K
 
001-36160
 
10/17/2014
 
4.1
 
 
 
 Indenture, dated as of February 3, 1999, among the New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc., as Primary Obligor, New Plan Realty Trust, as Guarantor, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee (the “1999 Indenture”)
 
8-K
 
001-12244
 
2/3/1999
 
4.1
 
 
 
Successor Supplemental Indenture to the 1999 Indenture, dated as of April 20, 2007, by and among Super IntermediateCo LLC, New Plan Realty Trust, LLC and U.S. Bank Trust National Association
 
10-Q
 
001-12244
 
8/9/2007
 
4.3
 
 
 
Term Loan Agreement, dated March 18, 2014, among Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, as borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders from time to time party thereto
 
8-K
 
001-36160
 
3/18/2014
 
10.1
 
 

47



 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
File No.
 
Date of
Filing
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Amendment No. 1 to Term Loan Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2015, among Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, as borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent
 
8-K
 
001-36160
 
2/9/2015
 
10.2
 
 
 
Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2010, by and among Centro NP New Garden SC Owner, LLC, Centro NP Clark, LLC, Centro NP Hamilton Plaza Owner, LLC, Centro NP Holdings 11 SPE, LLC, Centro NP Holdings 12 SPE, LLC, Centro NP Atlantic Plaza, LLC, Centro NP 23rd Street Station Owner, LLC, Centro NP Coconut Creek Owner, LLC, Centro NP Seminole Plaza Owner, LLC, Centro NP Ventura Downs Owner, LLC, Centro NP Augusta West Plaza, LLC, Centro NP Banks Station, LLC, Centro NP Laurel Square Owner, LLC, Centro NP Middletown Plaza Owner, LLC, Centro NP Miracle Mile, LLC, Centro NP Ridgeview, LLC, Centro NP Surrey Square Mall, LLC, Centro NP Covington Gallery Owner, LLC, Centro NP Stone Mountain, LLC, Centro NP Greentree SC, LLC, Centro NP Arbor Faire Owner, LP, Centro NP Holdings 10 SPE, LLC, HK New Plan Festival Center (IL), LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as lender
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
8/23/2013
 
10.9
 
 
 
Guaranty, dated as of July 28, 2010, made by Centro NP LLC for the benefit of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as lender (regarding Loan Agreement with Centro NP New Garden SC Owner, LLC, et al.)
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
8/23/2013
 
10.10
 
 
 
Senior Mezzanine Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2010, by and among Centro NP New Garden Mezz 1, LLC, Centro NP Senior Mezz Holding, LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as lender
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
8/23/2013
 
10.11
 
 
 
Senior Mezzanine Guaranty, dated as of July 28, 2010, made by Centro NP LLC for the benefit of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as lender
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
8/23/2013
 
10.12
 
 
 
Omnibus Amendment to the Mezzanine Loan Documents, dated as of September 1, 2010, by and among Centro NP New Garden Mezz 1, LLC, Centro NP Senior Mezz Holding, LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as lender
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
8/23/2013
 
10.13
 
 
 
Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2010, by and between Centro NP Roosevelt Mall Owner, LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as lender
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
8/23/2013
 
10.14
 
 

48



 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
File No.
 
Date of
Filing
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Guaranty, dated as of July 28, 2010, made by Centro NP LLC for the benefit of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as lender (regarding Loan Agreement with Centro NP Roosevelt Mall Owner, LLC)
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
8/23/2013
 
10.15
 
 
 
2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
9/23/2013
 
10.18
 
 
 
Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
8/23/2013
 
10.19
 
 
 
Employment Agreement, dated November 1, 2011, between BPG Subsidiary Inc. and Steven F. Siegel
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
8/23/2013
 
10.23
 
 
 
Form of Brixmor Property Group Inc. Restricted Stock Grant and Acknowledgment
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
10/4/2013
 
10.26
 
 
 
Form of Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement
 
S-11
 
333-190002
 
10/4/2013
 
10.30
 
 
 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
 
10-Q
 
001-36160
 
4/26/2016
 
10.6
 
 
 
Employment Agreement, dated April 12, 2016 by and between Brixmor Property Group Inc. and James M. Taylor
 
10-Q
 
001-36160
 
7/25/2016
 
10.1
 
 
 
Employment Agreement, dated April 26, 2016, by and between Brixmor Property Group Inc. and Angela Aman
 
10-Q
 
001-36160
 
7/25/2016
 
10.2
 
 
 
Employment Agreement, dated May 11, 2016 by and between Brixmor Property Group Inc. and Mark T. Horgan
 
10-K
 
001-36160
 
2/13/2017
 
10.22
 
 
 
Employment Agreement, dated December 5, 2014 by and between Brixmor Property Group Inc. and Brian T. Finnegan
 
10-K
 
001-36160
 
2/13/2017
 
10.23
 
 
 
Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2016, among Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, as borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto.
 
10-Q
 
001-36160
 
7/25/2016
 
10.5
 
 
 
Amendment No. 2 to Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2016, among Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, as borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto.
 
10-Q
 
001-36160
 
7/25/2016
 
10.6
 
 
 
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2017, among Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, as borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto.
 
8-K
 
001-36160
 
7/31/2017
 
10.1
 
 
 
Computation of Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
 
 
 
 
 
x
 
Subsidiaries of the Brixmor Property Group Inc.
 
 
 
 
 
x

49



 
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
File No.
 
Date of
Filing
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Subsidiaries of the Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
 
 
 
 
 
x
 
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP for Brixmor Property Group Inc.
 
 
 
 
 
x
 
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP for Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
 
 
 
 
 
x
 
Brixmor Property Group Inc. Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
x
 
Brixmor Property Group Inc. Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
x
 
Brixmor Operating Partnership LP Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
x
 
Brixmor Operating Partnership LP Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
x
 
Brixmor Property Group Inc. Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
x
 
Brixmor Operating Partnership LP Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
x
 
Property List
 
 
 
 
 
x
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
 
 
x
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
 
 
 
x
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
 
 
x
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
 
 
 
x
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
 
 
 
x
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
 
 
x
* Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.


50



The agreements and other documents filed as exhibits to this report are not intended to provide factual information or other disclosure other than with respect to the terms of the agreements or other documents themselves, and you should not rely on them for that purpose. In particular, any representations and warranties made by us in these agreements or other documents were made solely within the specific context of the relevant agreement or document and may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.


51



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC.
 
 
 
Date: February 12, 2018
By:
/s/ James M. Taylor
 
 
James M. Taylor
 
 
Chief Executive Officer and President
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
BRIXMOR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LP
 
 
 
Date: February 12, 2018
By:
/s/ James M. Taylor
 
 
James M. Taylor
 
 
Chief Executive Officer and President
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date: February 12, 2018
By:
/s/ James M. Taylor
 
 
James M. Taylor
 
 
Chief Executive Officer and President
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer, Director, Sole Director of Sole Member of General Partner of Operating Partnership)
 
 
 
Date: February 12, 2018
By:
/s/ Angela Aman
 
 
Angela Aman
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 
Date: February 12, 2018
By:
/s/ Steven Gallagher
 
 
Steven Gallagher
 
 
Chief Accounting Officer
 
 
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
Date: February 12, 2018
By:
/s/ John G. Schreiber
 
 
John G. Schreiber
 
 
Chairman of the Board of Directors
 
 
 
Date: February 12, 2018
By:
/s/ Michael Berman
 
 
Michael Berman
 
 
Director
 
 
 
Date: February 12, 2018
By:
/s/ Sheryl M. Crosland
 
 
Sheryl M. Crosland
 
 
Director
 
 
 
Date: February 12, 2018
By:
/s/ Thomas W. Dickson
 
 
Thomas W. Dickson
 
 
Director
 
 
 
Date: February 12, 2018
By:
/s/ Daniel B. Hurwitz
 
 
Daniel B. Hurwitz
 
 
Director
 
 
 
Date: February 12, 2018
By:
/s/ William D. Rahm
 
 
William D. Rahm
 
 
Director
 
 
 
Date: February 12, 2018
By:
/s/ Gabrielle Sulzberger
 
 
Gabrielle Sulzberger
 
 
Director

52



INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 
 
Form 10-K Page
1
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
 
 
 
 
 
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Brixmor Property Group Inc.:
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Brixmor Operating Partnership LP:
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Capital for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 
 
2
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
 
 
 
 
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
 
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
 
 
 
 
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
 


F-1




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Brixmor Property Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Brixmor Property Group Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 12, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


New York, New York   
February 12, 2018  

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.












F-2




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Brixmor Property Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Brixmor Property Group Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, of the Company and our report dated February 12, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


New York, New York   
February 12, 2018


F-3




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Partners and Board of Directors of Brixmor Operating Partnership LP and Subsidiaries
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Brixmor Operating Partnership LP and Subsidiaries (the “Operating Partnership”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 12, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


New York, New York   
February 12, 2018  

We have served as the Operating Partnership’s auditor since 2015.












F-4




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Partners and the Board of Directors of Brixmor Operating Partnership LP and Subsidiaries
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Brixmor Operating Partnership LP and Subsidiaries (the “Operating Partnership”) as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Operating Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, of the Operating Partnership and our report dated February 12, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Operating Partnership’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


New York, New York   
February 12, 2018 


F-5



BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 (in thousands, except share information)
 
December 31,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
Assets
 
 
 
Real estate
 
 
 
Land
$
1,984,309

 
$
2,006,655

Buildings and improvements
8,937,182

 
9,002,403

 
10,921,491

 
11,009,058

Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(2,361,070
)
 
(2,167,054
)
Real estate, net
8,560,421

 
8,842,004

 
 
 
 
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture

 
7,921

Cash and cash equivalents
56,938

 
51,402

Restricted cash
53,839

 
51,467

Marketable securities
28,006

 
25,573

Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $17,205 and $16,756
232,111

 
178,216

Deferred charges and prepaid expenses, net
147,508

 
122,787

Other assets
75,103

 
40,315

Total assets
$
9,153,926

 
$
9,319,685

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
Debt obligations, net
$
5,676,238

 
$
5,838,889

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
569,340

 
553,636

Total liabilities
6,245,578

 
6,392,525

 
 
 
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)

 

 
 
 
 
Equity
 
 
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 3,000,000,000 shares; 304,947,144 and 304,343,141 shares issued and 304,620,186 and 304,343,141 shares outstanding
3,046

 
3,043

Additional paid-in capital
3,330,466

 
3,324,874

Accumulated other comprehensive income
24,211

 
21,519

Distributions in excess of net income
(449,375
)
 
(426,552
)
Total stockholders’ equity
2,908,348

 
2,922,884

Non-controlling interests

 
4,276

Total equity
2,908,348

 
2,927,160

Total liabilities and equity
$
9,153,926

 
$
9,319,685

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-6



BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
997,089

 
$
998,118

 
$
984,548

Expense reimbursements
278,636

 
270,548

 
276,032

Other revenues
7,455

 
7,106

 
5,400

Total revenues
1,283,180

 
1,275,772

 
1,265,980

 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
Operating costs
136,092

 
133,429

 
129,477

Real estate taxes
179,097

 
174,487

 
180,911

Depreciation and amortization
375,028

 
387,302

 
417,935

Provision for doubtful accounts
5,323

 
9,182

 
9,540

Impairment of real estate assets
40,104

 
5,154

 
1,005

General and administrative
92,247

 
92,248

 
98,454

Total operating expenses
827,891

 
801,802

 
837,322

 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income (expense)
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends and interest
365

 
542

 
315

Interest expense
(226,660
)
 
(226,671
)
 
(245,012
)
Gain on sale of real estate assets
68,847

 
35,613

 
11,744

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, net
498

 
(832
)
 
1,720

Other
(2,907
)
 
(4,957
)
 
(348
)
Total other expense
(159,857
)
 
(196,305
)
 
(231,581
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income before equity in income of unconsolidated joint venture
295,432

 
277,665

 
197,077

Equity in income of unconsolidated joint venture
381

 
477

 
459

Gain on disposition of unconsolidated joint venture interest
4,556

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
300,369

 
278,142

 
197,536

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
(76
)
 
(2,514
)
 
(3,816
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Brixmor Property Group Inc.
300,293

 
275,628

 
193,720

Preferred stock dividends
(39
)
 
(150
)
 
(150
)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
300,254

 
$
275,478

 
$
193,570

Per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common stockholders:
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

Diluted
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

Weighted average shares:
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
304,834

 
301,601

 
298,004

Diluted
305,281

 
305,060

 
305,017

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7



BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Net income
$
300,369

 
$
278,142

 
$
197,536

Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
Change in unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net (Note 6)
2,815

 
24,042

 
1,986

Change in unrealized loss on marketable securities
(123
)
 
(14
)
 
(60
)
Total other comprehensive income
2,692

 
24,028

 
1,926

Comprehensive income
303,061

 
302,170

 
199,462

Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests
(76
)
 
(2,514
)
 
(3,816
)
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders
$
302,985

 
$
299,656

 
$
195,646

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




F-8



BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(in thousands, except per share data)

 
Common Stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number
 
Amount
 
Additional Paid-in Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Distributions in Excess of Net Income
 
Non-controlling Interests
 
Total
Beginning balance, January 1, 2015
296,552

 
$
2,966

 
$
3,223,941

 
$
(4,435
)
 
$
(318,762
)
 
$
76,593

 
$
2,980,303

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock dividends ($0.92 per common share)

 

 

 

 
(275,903
)
 

 
(275,903
)
Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 
(5,843
)
 
(5,843
)
Equity based compensation expense

 

 
22,841

 

 

 
490

 
23,331

Preferred stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 
(150
)
 
(150
)
Issuance of common stock and OP Units
67

 

 
(743
)
 

 

 
765

 
22

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 
1,926

 

 

 
1,926

Share-based awards retained for taxes

 

 
(920
)
 

 

 

 
(920
)
Conversion of Operating Partnership units into common stock
2,519

 
25

 
25,127

 

 

 
(25,152
)
 

Net income

 

 

 

 
193,720

 
3,816

 
197,536

Ending balance, December 31, 2015
299,138

 
$
2,991

 
$
3,270,246

 
$
(2,509
)
 
$
(400,945
)
 
$
50,519

 
$
2,920,302

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock dividends ($0.995 per common share)

 

 

 

 
(301,235
)
 

 
(301,235
)
Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 
(2,403
)
 
(2,403
)
Equity based compensation expense

 

 
11,478

 

 

 
91

 
11,569

Preferred stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 
(150
)
 
(150
)
Issuance of common stock and OP Units
229

 
2

 
(1,395
)
 

 

 
1,604

 
211

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 
24,028

 

 

 
24,028

Conversion of Operating Partnership units into common stock
4,976

 
50

 
47,849

 

 

 
(47,899
)
 

Shared-based awards retained for taxes

 

 
(3,304
)
 

 

 

 
(3,304
)
Net income

 

 

 

 
275,628

 
2,514

 
278,142

Ending balance, December 31, 2016
304,343

 
$
3,043

 
$
3,324,874

 
$
21,519

 
$
(426,552
)
 
$
4,276

 
$
2,927,160

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock dividends ($1.055 per common share)

 

 

 

 
(322,475
)
 

 
(322,475
)
Equity based compensation expense

 

 
10,474

 

 

 
3

 
10,477

Preferred stock dividends

 

 

 

 
(641
)
 
(648
)
 
(1,289
)
Other comprehensive income

 

 

 
2,692

 

 

 
2,692

Issuance of Common Stock and OP units
201

 
6

 

 

 

 
(6
)
 

Repurchases of common stock
(327
)
 
(3
)
 
(5,869
)
 

 

 

 
(5,872
)
Share-based awards retained for taxes

 

 
(2,714
)
 

 

 

 
(2,714
)
Conversion of Operating Partnership units into common stock
403

 

 
3,701

 

 

 
(3,701
)
 

Net income

 

 

 

 
300,293

 
76

 
300,369

Ending balance, December 31, 2017
304,620

 
$
3,046

 
$
3,330,466

 
$
24,211

 
$
(449,375
)
 
$

 
$
2,908,348

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-9



BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
300,369

 
$
278,142

 
$
197,536

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
375,028

 
387,302

 
417,935

Debt premium and discount amortization
(5,323
)
 
(12,436
)
 
(18,065
)
Deferred financing cost amortization
6,971

 
7,708

 
8,302

Above- and below-market lease intangible amortization
(29,634
)
 
(37,730
)
 
(47,757
)
Provisions for impairment
40,104

 
5,154

 
1,005

Gain on disposition of operating properties
(68,847
)
 
(35,613
)
 
(11,744
)
Gain on disposition of unconsolidated joint venture interest
(4,556
)
 

 

Equity based compensation
10,477

 
11,569

 
23,331

Other
2,511

 
1,121

 
358

(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, net
(505
)
 
814

 
(5,306
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Receivables
(26,458
)
 
1,566

 
1,829

Deferred charges and prepaid expenses
(53,316
)
 
(33,819
)
 
(40,460
)
Other assets
(3,575
)
 
(644
)
 
(43
)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
8,695

 
(5,667
)
 
(2,923
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
551,941

 
567,467

 
523,998

 
 
 
 
 
 
Investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Improvements to and investments in real estate assets
(202,873
)
 
(192,428
)
 
(189,934
)
Acquisitions of real estate assets
(190,487
)
 
(46,833
)
 
(52,208
)
Proceeds from sales of real estate assets
330,757

 
102,904

 
54,236

Contributions to unconsolidated joint venture

 
(2,846
)
 

Proceeds from sale of unconsolidated joint venture interest
12,369

 

 

Purchase of marketable securities
(28,263
)
 
(46,325
)
 
(24,278
)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
25,623

 
43,647

 
21,441

Net cash used in investing activities
(52,874
)
 
(141,881
)
 
(190,743
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Repayment of debt obligations and financing liabilities
(409,575
)
 
(914,471
)
 
(1,122,118
)
Repayment of borrowings under unsecured revolving credit facility
(603,000
)
 
(840,000
)
 
(1,118,475
)
Proceeds from borrowings under unsecured revolving credit facility
481,000

 
546,000

 
1,015,000

Proceeds from unsecured term loans and notes
1,193,916

 
1,094,648

 
1,195,821

Repayment of borrowings under unsecured term loan
(815,000
)
 

 

Deferred financing costs
(11,135
)
 
(17,639
)
 
(10,834
)
Distributions to common stockholders
(317,389
)
 
(295,205
)
 
(268,281
)
Distributions to non-controlling interests
(1,390
)
 
(3,736
)
 
(26,314
)
Repurchase of common shares
(5,872
)
 

 

Repurchase of common shares in conjunction with equity award plans
(2,714
)
 
(3,304
)
 
(823
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(491,159
)
 
(433,707
)
 
(336,024
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
7,908

 
(8,121
)
 
(2,769
)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period
102,869

 
110,990

 
113,759

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period
$
110,777

 
$
102,869

 
$
110,990

 
 
 
 
 
 
Reconciliation to consolidated balance sheets
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
56,938

 
$
51,402

 
$
69,528

Restricted cash
53,839

 
51,467

 
41,462

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period
$
110,777

 
$
102,869

 
$
110,990

 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
 
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized of $2,945, $2,870 and $2,749
$
223,198

 
$
228,378

 
$
244,067

State and local taxes paid
2,199

 
2,067

 
2,278

Supplemental non-cash investing and/or financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Assumed mortgage debt through acquisition

 

 
7,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-10



BRIXMOR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 (in thousands, except unit information)
 
December 31,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
Assets
 
 
 
Real estate
 
 
 
Land
$
1,984,309

 
$
2,006,655

Buildings and improvements
8,937,182

 
9,002,403

 
10,921,491

 
11,009,058

Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(2,361,070
)
 
(2,167,054
)
Real estate, net
8,560,421

 
8,842,004

 
 
 
 
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures

 
7,921

Cash and cash equivalents
56,908

 
51,368

Restricted cash
53,839

 
51,467

Marketable securities
27,787

 
25,356

Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $17,205 and $16,756
232,111

 
178,216

Deferred charges and prepaid expenses, net
147,508

 
122,787

Other assets
75,103

 
40,315

Total assets
$
9,153,677

 
$
9,319,434

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
Debt obligations, net
$
5,676,238

 
$
5,838,889

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
569,340

 
553,636

Total liabilities
6,245,578

 
6,392,525

 
 
 
 
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 14)

 

 
 
 
 
Capital
 
 
 
Partnership common units; 304,947,144 and 304,720,842 units issued and 304,620,186 and 304,720,842 units outstanding
2,883,875

 
2,905,378

Accumulated other comprehensive income
24,224

 
21,531

Total capital
2,908,099

 
2,926,909

Total liabilities and capital
$
9,153,677

 
$
9,319,434

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-11



BRIXMOR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
997,089

 
$
998,118

 
$
984,548

Expense reimbursements
278,636

 
270,548

 
276,032

Other revenues
7,455

 
7,106

 
5,400

Total revenues
1,283,180

 
1,275,772

 
1,265,980

 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
Operating costs
136,092

 
133,429

 
129,477

Real estate taxes
179,097

 
174,487

 
180,911

Depreciation and amortization
375,028

 
387,302

 
417,935

Provision for doubtful accounts
5,323

 
9,182

 
9,540

Impairment of real estate assets
40,104

 
5,154

 
1,005

General and administrative
92,247

 
92,248

 
98,454

Total operating expenses
827,891

 
801,802

 
837,322

 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income (expense)
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends and interest
365

 
542

 
315

Interest expense
(226,660
)
 
(226,671
)
 
(245,012
)
Gain on sale of real estate assets
68,847

 
35,613

 
11,744

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, net
498

 
(832
)
 
1,720

Other
(2,907
)
 
(4,957
)
 
(348
)
Total other expense
(159,857
)
 
(196,305
)
 
(231,581
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income before equity in income of unconsolidated joint venture
295,432

 
277,665

 
197,077

Equity in income of unconsolidated joint venture
381

 
477

 
459

Gain on disposition of unconsolidated joint venture interest
4,556

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
$
300,369

 
$
278,142

 
$
197,536

 
 
 
 
 
 
Per common unit:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to partnership common units:
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

Diluted
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

Weighted average number of partnership common units:
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
304,913

 
304,600

 
303,992

Diluted
305,281

 
305,059

 
305,017

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-12



BRIXMOR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Net income attributable to Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
$
300,369

 
$
278,142

 
$
197,536

Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
Change in unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net (Note 6)
2,815

 
24,042

 
1,986

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities
(122
)
 
(16
)
 
(56
)
Total other comprehensive income
2,693

 
24,026

 
1,930

Comprehensive income attributable to Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
$
303,062

 
$
302,168

 
$
199,466

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-13



BRIXMOR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL

(in thousands)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Partnership Common Units
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Total
Beginning balance, January 1, 2015
$
2,984,381

 
$
(4,425
)
 
$
2,979,956

Distributions to partners
(281,785
)
 

 
(281,785
)
Equity based compensation expense
23,331

 

 
23,331

Other comprehensive income

 
1,930

 
1,930

Issuance of OP Units
22

 

 
22

Share-based awards retained for taxes
(920
)
 

 
(920
)
Net income attributable to Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
197,536

 

 
197,536

Ending balance, December 31, 2015
$
2,922,565

 
$
(2,495
)
 
$
2,920,070

 
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions to partners
(303,805
)
 

 
(303,805
)
Equity based compensation expense
11,569

 

 
11,569

Other comprehensive income

 
24,026

 
24,026

Issuance of OP Units
211

 

 
211

Share-based awards retained for taxes
(3,304
)
 

 
(3,304
)
Net income attributable to Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
278,142

 

 
278,142

Ending balance, December 31, 2016
$
2,905,378

 
$
21,531

 
$
2,926,909

 
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions to partners
(323,763
)
 

 
(323,763
)
Equity based compensation expense
10,477

 

 
10,477

Other comprehensive income

 
2,693

 
2,693

Repurchases of OP Units
(5,872
)
 

 
(5,872
)
Share-based awards retained for taxes
(2,714
)
 

 
(2,714
)
Net income attributable to Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
300,369

 

 
300,369

Ending balance, December 31, 2017
$
2,883,875

 
$
24,224

 
$
2,908,099

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-14



BRIXMOR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
$
300,369

 
$
278,142

 
$
197,536

Adjustments to reconcile net income attributable to Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
375,028

 
387,302

 
417,935

Debt premium and discount amortization
(5,323
)
 
(12,436
)
 
(18,065
)
Deferred financing cost amortization
6,971

 
7,708

 
8,302

Above- and below-market lease intangible amortization
(29,634
)
 
(37,730
)
 
(47,757
)
Provisions for impairment
40,104

 
5,154

 
1,005

Gain on disposition of operating properties
(68,847
)
 
(35,613
)
 
(11,744
)
Gain on disposition of unconsolidated joint venture interest
(4,556
)
 

 

Equity based compensation
10,477

 
11,569

 
23,331

Other
2,511

 
1,121

 
358

(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, net
(505
)
 
814

 
(5,306
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Receivables
(26,458
)
 
1,566

 
1,829

Deferred charges and prepaid expenses
(53,316
)
 
(33,819
)
 
(40,460
)
Other assets
(3,575
)
 
(644
)
 
(43
)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
8,695

 
(5,667
)
 
(2,923
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
551,941

 
567,467

 
523,998

 
 
 
 
 
 
Investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Improvements to and investments in real estate assets
(202,873
)
 
(192,428
)
 
(189,934
)
Acquisitions of real estate assets
(190,487
)
 
(46,833
)
 
(52,208
)
Proceeds from sales of real estate assets
330,757

 
102,904

 
54,236

Contributions to unconsolidated joint venture

 
(2,846
)
 

Proceeds from sale of unconsolidated joint venture interest
12,369

 

 

Purchase of marketable securities
(28,261
)
 
(46,317
)
 
(24,275
)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
25,623

 
43,647

 
21,441

Net cash used in investing activities
(52,872
)
 
(141,873
)
 
(190,740
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Repayment of debt obligations and financing liabilities
(409,575
)
 
(914,471
)
 
(1,122,118
)
Repayment of borrowings under unsecured revolving credit facility
(603,000
)
 
(840,000
)
 
(1,118,475
)
Proceeds from borrowings under unsecured revolving credit facility
481,000

 
546,000

 
1,015,000

Proceeds from unsecured term loan and notes
1,193,916

 
1,094,648

 
1,195,821

Repayment of borrowings under unsecured term loan
(815,000
)
 

 

Deferred financing costs
(11,135
)
 
(17,639
)
 
(10,834
)
Partner distributions
(327,363
)
 
(302,265
)
 
(275,428
)
Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 
(19,870
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(491,157
)
 
(433,727
)
 
(335,904
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
7,912

 
(8,133
)
 
(2,646
)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period
102,835

 
110,968

 
113,614

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period
$
110,747

 
$
102,835

 
$
110,968

 
 
 
 
 
 
Reconciliation to consolidated balance sheets
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
56,908

 
$
51,368

 
$
69,506

Restricted cash
53,839

 
51,467

 
41,462

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period
$
110,747

 
$
102,835

 
$
110,968

 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
 
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized of $2,945, $2,870 and $2,749
$
223,198

 
$
228,378

 
$
244,067

State and local taxes paid
2,199

 
2,067

 
2,278

Supplemental non-cash investing and/or financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Assumed mortgage debt through acquisition

 

 
7,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-15



BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC. AND BRIXMOR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands, unless otherwise stated)

1. Nature of Business and Financial Statement Presentation
Description of Business
Brixmor Property Group Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Parent Company”) is an internally-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Brixmor Operating Partnership LP and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Operating Partnership”) is the entity through which the Parent Company conducts substantially all of its operations and owns substantially all of its assets. The Parent Company owns 100% of the common stock of BPG Subsidiary Inc. (“BPG Sub”), which, in turn, is the sole member of Brixmor OP GP LLC (the “General Partner”), the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Parent Company engages in the ownership, management, leasing, acquisition, disposition and redevelopment of retail shopping centers through the Operating Partnership, and has no other substantial assets or liabilities other than through its investment in the Operating Partnership. The Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and their controlled subsidiaries on a consolidated basis (collectively the “Company” or “Brixmor”) believes it owns and operates one of the largest open air retail portfolios by gross leasable area (“GLA”) in the United States, comprised primarily of community and neighborhood shopping centers. As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s portfolio was comprised of 486 shopping centers totaling approximately 83 million square feet of gross leasable area (the “Portfolio”). In addition, the Company has one land parcel currently under development. The Company’s high quality national Portfolio is primarily located within established trade areas in the top 50 Metropolitan Statistical Areas, and our shopping centers are primarily anchored by non-discretionary and value-oriented retailers, as well as consumer-oriented service providers.
 
The Company does not distinguish its principal business or group its operations on a geographical basis for purposes of measuring performance. Accordingly, the Company has a single reportable segment for disclosure purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

Basis of Presentation
The financial information included herein reflects the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. The Company has determined that it is preferable to present underwriter fees associated with the Company’s issuance of unsecured senior notes in the line item Deferred financing costs as opposed to deducting the amount of the fees within the line item Proceeds from unsecured term loans and notes within financing activities in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.  In connection with this revised presentation, certain prior year balances have been adjusted to conform to the current year presentation described above.

Principles of Consolidation and Use of Estimates
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, each of their wholly owned subsidiaries and all other entities in which they have a controlling financial interest. The portions of consolidated entities not owned by the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are presented as non-controlling interests as of and during the periods presented. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

When the Company obtains an economic interest in an entity, management evaluates the entity to determine: (i) whether the entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”), (ii) in the event the entity is a VIE, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the entity, and (iii) in the event the entity is not a VIE, whether the Company otherwise has a controlling financial interest.

The Company consolidates: (i) entities that are VIEs for which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and (ii) entities that are not VIEs which the Company controls.  If the Company has an interest in a VIE but it is not determined to be the primary beneficiary, the Company accounts for its interest under the equity method of accounting. Similarly, for those entities which are not VIEs and the Company does not have a controlling financial interest, the Company accounts for its interests under the equity method of accounting. The Company continually reconsiders its determination of whether an entity is a VIE and whether the Company qualifies as its primary beneficiary. The Company has evaluated the Operating Partnership and has determined it is not a VIE as of December 31, 2017.


F-16



GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during a reporting period. The most significant assumptions and estimates relate to impairment of real estate, recovery of receivables and depreciable lives. These estimates are based on historical experience and other assumptions which management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Management evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis and makes revisions to these estimates and related disclosures as new information becomes known. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Non-controlling Interests
The Company accounts for non-controlling interests in accordance with the Consolidation guidance and the Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). Non-controlling interests represent the portion of equity that the Company does not own in those entities that it consolidates. The Company identifies its non-controlling interests separately within the Equity section of the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amounts of consolidated net earnings attributable to the Company and to the non-controlling interests are presented separately on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of presentation on both the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers instruments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.
 
The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents at major financial institutions.  The cash and cash equivalent balance at one or more of these financial institutions exceeds the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance coverage. The Company periodically assesses the credit risk associated with these financial institutions and believes that the risk of loss is minimal.

Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents cash deposited in escrow accounts, which generally can only be used for the payment of real estate taxes, debt service, insurance, and future capital expenditures as required by certain loan and lease agreements as well as legally restricted tenant security deposits and funds held in escrow for pending transactions.

Real Estate
Real estate assets are recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Upon acquisition of real estate operating properties, management estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings, and tenant improvements), identifiable intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above and below-market leases, in-place leases and tenant relationships), and assumed debt based on an evaluation of available information. Based on these estimates, the estimated fair value is allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities. Transaction costs incurred during the acquisition process are capitalized as a component of the asset’s value.

The fair value of tangible assets is determined as if the acquired property is vacant. Fair value is determined using an exit price approach, which contemplates the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

In allocating the fair value to identifiable intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired operating property, the value of above-market and below-market leases is estimated based on the present value (using a discount rate reflecting the risks associated with leases acquired) of the difference between: (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the leases negotiated and in-place at the time of acquisition and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the property or an equivalent property, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease, which includes renewal periods with fixed rental terms that are considered to be below-market. The capitalized above-market or below-market intangible is amortized as a reduction of, or increase to, rental income over the remaining non-cancelable term of each lease.

In determining the value of in-place leases and tenant relationships, management evaluates the specific characteristics of each lease and the Company’s overall relationship with each tenant. Factors considered include, but are not limited to: the nature of the existing relationship with a tenant, the credit risk associated with a tenant, expectations surrounding lease renewals, estimated carrying costs of a property during a hypothetical expected lease-up period, current market

F-17



conditions and costs to execute similar leases. Management also considers information obtained about a property in connection with its pre-acquisition due diligence. Estimated carrying costs include property operating costs, insurance, real estate taxes and estimates of lost rentals at market rates. Costs to execute similar leases include leasing commissions and legal costs to the extent that such costs are not already incurred with a new lease that has been negotiated in connection with the purchase of a property. The values assigned to in-place leases and tenant relationships are amortized to Depreciation and amortization expense over the remaining term of each lease.

Certain real estate assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
Building and building and land improvements
20 – 40 years
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
5 – 10 years
Tenant improvements
The shorter of the term of the related lease or useful life

Costs to fund major replacements and betterments, which extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their respective useful lives, while costs for ordinary repairs and maintenance activities are expensed as incurred.

When a real estate asset is identified by management as held-for-sale, the Company discontinues depreciation and estimates its sales price, net of estimated selling costs. If the estimated net sales price of an asset is less than its net carrying value, a loss is recognized to reflect the estimated fair value. Properties classified as real estate held-for-sale generally represent properties that are under contract for sale and are expected to close within 12 months.

On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are indicators, including property operating performance, changes in anticipated holding period and general market conditions, that the value of the Company’s real estate assets (including any related intangible assets or liabilities) may be impaired. If an indicator is identified, a real estate asset is considered impaired only if management’s estimate of current and projected operating cash flows (undiscounted and unleveraged), taking into account the anticipated and probability weighted holding period, are less than a real estate asset’s carrying value. Various factors are considered in the estimation process, including trends and prospects and the effects of demand, competition and other economic factors. Changes in any estimates and/or assumptions, including the anticipated holding period, could have a material impact on the projected operating cash flows. If management determines that the carrying value of a real estate asset is impaired, a loss is recognized for the excess of its carrying amount over its fair value.

In situations in which a lease or leases with a tenant have been, or are expected to be, terminated early, the Company evaluates the remaining useful lives of depreciable or amortizable assets in the asset group related to the lease that will be terminated (i.e., tenant improvements, above and below market lease intangibles, in-place lease value and leasing commissions). Based upon consideration of the facts and circumstances surrounding the termination, the Company may accelerate the depreciation and amortization associated with the asset group.

Real Estate Under Development and Redevelopment
Certain costs are capitalized related to the development and redevelopment of real estate including pre-construction costs, real estate taxes, insurance, construction costs and salaries and related costs of personnel directly involved. Additionally, the Company capitalizes interest costs related to development and redevelopment activities. Capitalization of these costs begin when the activities and related expenditures commence and cease when the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, at which time the project is placed in service and depreciation commences. Additionally, the Company makes estimates as to the probability of certain development and redevelopment projects being completed. If the Company determines the development or redevelopment is no longer probable of completion, the Company expenses all capitalized costs which are not recoverable. 

Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company accounted for its investment in the unconsolidated joint venture using the equity method of accounting as the Company exercised significant influence over, but did not control this entity. This investment was initially recorded at cost and was subsequently adjusted for cash contributions and distributions. Earnings for the investment were recognized in accordance with the terms of the underlying agreement. Intercompany fees and gains on transactions with the unconsolidated joint venture were eliminated to the extent of the Company’s ownership interest.

F-18




On a periodic basis, management assessed whether there were indicators, including the property operating performance, changes in anticipated holding period and general market conditions, that the value of the Company’s investment in the unconsolidated joint venture may have been impaired. An investment’s value was impaired only if management’s estimate of the fair value of the Company’s investment was less than its carrying value and such difference was deemed to be other-than-temporary. To the extent impairment had occurred, a loss was recognized for the excess of its carrying amount over its fair value.

Deferred Leasing and Financing Costs
Costs incurred in executing tenant leases (including internal leasing costs) and long-term financing are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the related lease or debt agreement, which approximates the effective interest method. Costs incurred in executing tenant leases which are capitalized include a portion of salaries, lease incentives and the related costs of personnel directly involved in successful leasing efforts. Costs incurred in executing long-term financing which are capitalized include bank and legal fees. The amortization of deferred leasing and financing costs is included in Depreciation and amortization and Interest expense, respectively, in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and within Operating activities on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Marketable Securities
The Company classifies its marketable securities, which include both debt and equity securities, as available-for-sale. These securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The fair value of marketable securities are based primarily on publicly traded market values in active markets and are classified accordingly on the fair value hierarchy.

On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are indicators that the value of the Company’s marketable securities may be impaired. A marketable security is impaired if the fair value of the security is less than its carrying value and the difference is determined to be other-than-temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, a loss is recognized for the excess of the carrying value over its fair value.

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of the Company’s marketable securities portfolio approximated its cost basis.

Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivatives, including certain derivatives embedded in other contracts, are measured at fair value and are recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets or liabilities, depending on the Company’s rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative varies based on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the necessary criteria.

Revenue Recognition and Receivables
Rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases.  The cumulative difference between rental revenue recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and contractual payment terms is recorded as deferred rent and presented on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets within Receivables, net. 

The Company commences recognizing rental revenue based on an evaluation of a number of factors. In most cases, revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset.

Certain leases also provide for percentage rents based upon the level of sales achieved by a lessee.  These percentage rents are recognized upon the achievement of certain pre-determined sales levels. Leases also typically provide for reimbursement of common area expenses, real estate taxes and other operating expenses by the lessee and are recognized in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred. 

Gains from the sale of depreciated operating properties are generally recognized under the full accrual method, provided that various criteria relating to the terms of the sale and subsequent involvement by the Company with the applicable property are met.

F-19




The Company periodically evaluates the collectability of its receivables related to rental revenue, straight-line rent, expense reimbursements and those attributable to other revenue generating activities. The Company analyzes its receivables and historical bad debt levels, tenant credit-worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, tenants in bankruptcy are analyzed and estimates are made in connection with the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims.

Stock Based Compensation
The Company accounts for equity awards in accordance with the FASB’s Stock Compensation guidance which requires that all share based payments to employees and non-employee directors be recognized in the statement of operations over the service period based on their fair value. Fair value is determined based on the type of award using either the grant date market price of the Company’s stock, the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model or a Monte Carlo simulation model. Share-based compensation expense is included in General and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Income Taxes
The Parent Company has elected to qualify as a REIT in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). To qualify as a REIT, the Parent Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, to its stockholders. It is management’s intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Parent Company’s REIT status.

On April 3, 2017, BPG Sub’s status as a REIT terminated when BPG Sub became a disregarded subsidiary of the Parent Company for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Prior to its termination of REIT status, BPG Sub had also elected to qualify as a REIT under the Code and was subject to the same tax requirements and tax treatment as the Parent Company.

As a REIT, the Parent Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that distributions to its stockholders equal at least the amount of its REIT taxable income as defined under the Code. The Parent Company conducts substantially all of its operations through the Operating Partnership which is organized as a limited partnership and treated as a pass-through entity for U.S. federal tax purposes. Therefore, U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income do not materially impact the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

If the Parent Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to U.S. federal taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Parent Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company is subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income.

The Company has elected to treat certain of its subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”), and the Company may in the future elect to treat newly formed and/or existing subsidiaries as TRSs. A TRS may participate in non-real estate-related activities and/or perform non-customary services for tenants and are subject to certain limitations under the Code. A TRS is subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes. Income taxes related to the Company’s TRSs do not materially impact the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

The Company has considered the tax positions taken for the open tax years and has concluded that no provision for income taxes related to uncertain tax positions is required in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Open tax years generally range from 2014 through 2017, but may vary by jurisdiction and issue. The Company recognizes penalties and interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense, which is included in Other on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815).” ASU 2017-12 amends guidance to more closely align the results of cash flow and fair value hedge accounting with risk management activities through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results in the financial statements. The standard is effective on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-12 to have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

F-20




In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718).” ASU 2017-09 clarifies guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. The standard is effective on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-09 to have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805).” ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The new guidance will result in many real estate transactions being classified as an asset acquisition and transaction costs being capitalized.  The standard is effective on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. ASU 2017-01 was early adopted by the Company on January 1, 2017. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-01 the Company has begun capitalizing transaction costs associated with the acquisition of real estate assets. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company capitalized $0.9 million of transaction costs. The Company determined that these amounts did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230).” ASU 2016-18 requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.  The standard is effective on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. ASU 2016-18 was early adopted by the Company on January 1, 2017. As a result of adopting ASU 2016-18 the Company now presents the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows inclusive of restricted cash balances and also provides a reconciliation to the cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash amounts presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company determined that these changes did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230).” ASU 2016-15 provides classification guidance for certain cash receipts and cash payments including payment of debt extinguishment costs, settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments, insurance claim payments and distributions from equity method investees. The standard is effective on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718).” ASU 2016-09 sets out amendments to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The new standard impacts certain aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statements of cash flows. The new standard became effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. As a result of adopting ASU 2016-09 the Company has elected to account for share-based award forfeitures on an actual basis as opposed to the use of an estimated forfeiture rate. The Company determined that these changes did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU 2016-02 sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e., lessees and lessors). The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. A lessee is also required to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases today. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. The pronouncement requires a modified retrospective method of adoption and is effective on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company will continue to evaluate the effect the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company. However, the Company currently believes that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will not have a material impact for operating leases where it is a lessor and will continue to record revenues from rental properties for its operating leases on a straight-line basis. However, for leases where the Company is a lessee, primarily for the Company’s ground leases and administrative office leases, the Company will be required to record a lease liability and a right of use asset on its Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair

F-21



value upon adoption. In addition, direct internal leasing overhead costs will continue to be capitalized, however, indirect internal leasing overhead costs previously capitalized will be expensed under ASU 2016-02.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” ASU 2014-09 contains a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance.  The guidance in ASU 2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of non-financial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards.  The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  The pronouncement allows either a full or modified retrospective method of adoption and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period.  Early adoption was permitted for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. A majority of the Company’s tenant-related revenue is recognized pursuant to lease agreements and will be governed by the recently issued leasing guidance discussed above. Based on an evaluation of the impact ASU 2014-09 will have on the Company’s sources of revenue, the Company has concluded that ASU 2014-09 will not have a material impact on the process for, timing of, and presentation and disclosure of revenue recognition from contracts with tenants and other customers. The majority of its revenue is out of the scope of ASU 2014-09. The Company will continue to follow the guidance under Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 840 until the guidance within ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2019.

Any other recently issued accounting standards or pronouncements not disclosed above have been excluded as they either are not relevant to the Company, or they are not expected to have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

2. Acquisition of Real Estate
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company acquired the following assets, in separate transactions (dollars in thousands):
Description(1)
 
Location
 
Month Acquired
 
GLA
 
Aggregate purchase price
Outparcel building adjacent to Annex of Arlington
 
Arlington Heights, IL
 
Feb-17
 
5,760

 
$
1,006

Outparcel adjacent to Northeast Plaza
 
Atlanta, GA
 
Feb-17
 
N/A

 
1,537

Arborland Center
 
Ann Arbor, MI
 
Mar-17
 
403,536

 
102,268

Building adjacent to Preston Park
 
Plano, TX
 
Apr-17
 
31,080

 
4,015

Outparcel building adjacent to Cobblestone Village
 
St. Augustine, FL
 
May-17
 
4,403

 
1,306

Outparcel adjacent to Wynnewood Village
 
Dallas, TX
 
May-17
 
N/A

 
1,658

Venice Village Shoppes
 
Venice, FL
 
Nov-17
 
175,054

 
33,486

Upland Town Square
 
Upland, CA
 
Nov-17
 
100,350

 
31,859

Plaza By The Sea
 
San Clemente, CA
 
Dec-17
 
49,089

 
13,352

 
 
 
 
 
 
769,272

 
$
190,487

(1) 
No debt was assumed related to any of the listed acquisitions.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company acquired the following assets, in separate transactions (dollars in thousands):
Description(1)
 
Location
 
Month Acquired
 
GLA
 
Aggregate purchase price
Building at Rose Pavilion
 
Pleasanton, CA
 
Sept-16
 
28,530

 
$
6,733

Felicita Town Center
 
Escondido, CA
 
Dec-16
 
126,502

 
40,100

 
 
 
 
 
 
155,032

 
$
46,833

(1) 
No debt was assumed related to any of the listed acquisitions.



F-22



The aggregate purchase price of the properties acquired during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, has been allocated as follows:
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
Assets
2017
 
2016
 
Land
$
45,055

 
$
14,059

 
Buildings
117,347

 
29,277

 
Building and tenant improvements
17,415

 
2,749

 
Above market leases(1)
3,051

 
652

 
In-place leases(2)
13,044

 
2,608

Total assets
195,912

 
49,345

 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
Below market leases(3)
4,103

 
2,512

 
Other liabilities
1,322

 

Total liabilities
5,425

 
2,512

Net assets acquired
$
190,487

 
$
46,833


(1) 
The weighted average amortization period at the time of acquisition for above market leases related to properties acquired during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was 5.5 years and 4.5 years, respectively.
(2) 
The weighted average amortization period at the time of acquisition for in-place leases related to properties acquired during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was 7.5 years and 6.3 years, respectively.
(3) 
The weighted average amortization period at the time of acquisition for below market leases related to properties acquired during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was 16.3 years and 11.9 years, respectively.

In addition, the Company acquired two land parcels and one outparcel building adjacent to existing Company owned shopping centers for an aggregate purchase price of $1.2 million in connection with its repositioning activities at those centers during the year ended December 31, 2016. This amount is included in Improvements to and investments in real estate assets on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred transaction costs of $1.4 million, of which $0.9 million was capitalized and included in Buildings and tenant improvements on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and $0.5 million was included in Other on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred transaction costs of $0.5 million and $2.3 million, respectively. These amounts are included in Other on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

3. Dispositions and Assets Held for Sale
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company disposed of 29 wholly owned shopping centers and two outparcel buildings for net proceeds of $330.8 million resulting in a gain of $68.7 million and impairment of $22.9 million. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company disposed of its unconsolidated joint venture interest for net proceeds of $12.4 million resulting in a gain of $4.6 million. The Company had one property held for sale as of December 31, 2017 with a carrying value of $27.1 million, which is included in Other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company disposed of six shopping centers, one office building and one outparcel building for net proceeds of $102.9 million resulting in a gain of $35.6 million and impairment of $2.0 million. The Company had no properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016.

For purposes of measuring provisions for impairments, fair value was determined based on contracts with buyers or purchase offers from potential buyers, adjusted to reflect associated transaction costs. The Company believes the inputs utilized were reasonable in the context of applicable market conditions; however, due to the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measures, including forecasted revenues and expenses based upon market conditions and future expectations, the Company determined that such fair value measurements were classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. For additional information regarding impairments taken by the Company, please see Note 5 and Note 8.


F-23


There were no discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 as none of the dispositions represented a strategic shift in the Company’s business that would qualify as discontinued operations.
 
4. Real Estate
The Company’s components of Real estate, net consisted of the following:
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Land
$
1,984,309

 
$
2,006,655

Buildings and improvements:
 
 
 
Buildings and tenant improvements(1)
8,145,085

 
8,165,672

Lease intangibles(2)
792,097

 
836,731

 
10,921,491

 
11,009,058

Accumulated depreciation and amortization(3)
(2,361,070
)
 
(2,167,054
)
Total
$
8,560,421

 
$
8,842,004

(1) 
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, Buildings and tenant improvements included accrued amounts of $22.8 million and $10.5 million, respectively, related to construction in progress, net of any anticipated insurance proceeds. 
(2) 
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, Lease intangibles consisted of $715.1 million and $758.0 million, respectively, of in-place leases and $77.0 million and $78.7 million, respectively, of above-market leases. These intangible assets are amortized over the term of each related lease.
(3) 
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, Accumulated depreciation and amortization included $629.1 million and $632.8 million, respectively, of accumulated amortization related to Lease intangibles.

In addition, at December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had intangible liabilities relating to below-market leases of $463.3 million and $485.2 million, respectively, and accumulated accretion of $281.5 million and $261.7 million, respectively. These intangible liabilities are included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. These intangible assets are accreted over the term of each related lease.

Below-market lease accretion income, net of above-market lease amortization for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $29.6 million, $37.7 million and $47.8 million, respectively. These amounts are included in Rental income in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amortization expense associated with in-place lease value for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $46.2 million, $60.0 million and $88.1 million, respectively. These amounts are included in Depreciation and amortization in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company’s estimated below-market lease accretion income, net of above-market lease amortization, and in-place leases amortization expense, for the next five years are as follows:
Year ending December 31,
 
Below-market lease accretion (income), net of above-market lease amortization
 
In-place leases amortization expense
2018
 
$
(24,568
)
 
$
34,062

2019
 
(20,737
)
 
26,939

2020
 
(16,924
)
 
19,956

2021
 
(13,985
)
 
14,382

2022
 
(11,741
)
 
10,898













F-24


5. Impairments
On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators, including property operating performance, changes in anticipated holding period and general market conditions, that the value of the Company’s real estate assets (including any related intangible assets or liabilities) may be impaired. If management determines that the carrying value of a real estate asset is impaired, a loss is recognized for the excess of its carrying amount over its fair value. The Company recognized the following impairments during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Property Name(1)
 
Location
 
GLA
 
Impairment Charge
The Plaza at Salmon Run
 
Watertown, NY
 
68,761

 
$
3,486

Smith’s
 
Socorro, NM
 
48,000

 
2,200

The Manchester Collection
 
Manchester, CT
 
342,247

 
9,026

Renaissance Center East(2)
 
Las Vegas, NV
 
144,216

 
1,658

Lexington Road Plaza(2)
 
Versailles, KY
 
197,668

 
6,393

Shops at Seneca Mall(2)
 
Liverpool, NY
 
231,024

 
2,226

Remount Village Shopping Center(2)
 
North Charleston, SC
 
60,238

 
921

Fashion Square
 
Orange Park, FL
 
36,029

 
2,125

The Shoppes at North Ridgeville(2)
 
North Ridgeville, OH
 
59,852

 
389

Milford Center(2)
 
Milford, CT
 
25,056

 
45

Highland Commons(2)
 
Glasgow, KY
 
130,466

 
2,499

The Vineyards(2)
 
Eastlake, OH
 
144,820

 
3,008

Salisbury Marketplace(2)
 
Salisbury, NC
 
79,732

 
1,544

Austin Town Center(2)
 
Austin, MN
 
110,680

 
1,853

Parkway Pointe(2)
 
Springfield, IL
 
38,737

 
2,373

Crossroads Centre
 
Fairview Heights, IL
 
242,752

 
358

 
 
 
 
1,960,278

 
$
40,104

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Property Name(1)
 
Location
 
GLA
 
Impairment Charge
Inwood Forest(3)
 
Houston, TX
 
77,553

 
$
52

Plymouth Plaza(3)
 
Plymouth Meeting, PA
 
30,013

 
1,997

Parcel at Country Hills Shopping Center
 
Torrance, CA
 
3,500

 
550

Milford Center(2)
 
Milford, CT
 
25,056

 
2,626

Other
 
 
N/A

 
(71
)
 
 
 
 
136,122

 
$
5,154

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2015
Property Name(1)
 
Location
 
GLA
 
Impairment Charge
Parkwest Crossing(4)
 
Durham  Chapel Hill, NC
 
85,602

 
$
807

Land Parcel(4)
 
Omaha Council Bluffs, NE-IA
 
N/A

 
198

 
 
 
 
85,602

 
$
1,005

(1) 
The Company recognized impairment charges based upon a change in the estimated hold period of these properties in connection with the Company’s capital recycling program.
(2) 
The Company disposed of this property during the year ended December 31, 2017.
(3) 
The Company disposed of this property during the year ended December 31, 2016.
(4) 
The Company disposed of this property during the year ended December 31, 2015.

The Company can provide no assurance that material impairment charges with respect to its Portfolio will not occur in future periods. See Note 3 for additional information regarding impairment charges taken in connection with the Company’s dispositions. See Note 8 for additional information regarding the fair value of impairments taken on operating properties.



F-25



6. Financial Instruments – Derivatives and Hedging
The Company’s use of derivative instruments is limited to the utilization of interest rate agreements or other instruments to manage interest rate risk exposures and not for speculative purposes. In certain situations, the Company may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements that result in the receipt and/or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company’s objective in using interest rate derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without changing the underlying notional amount. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company did not enter into any new interest rate swap agreements. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company entered into nine forward starting interest rate swap agreements (“Swaps”) with an effective date of November 1, 2016 and an aggregate notional value of $1.4 billion to partially hedge the variable cash flows associated with variable LIBOR based interest rate debt.

Detail on the Company’s interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
 
 
Number of Instruments
 
Notional Amount
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Interest Rate Swaps
 
9
 
9
 
$
1,400,000

 
$
1,400,000


The Company has elected to present its interest rate derivatives on its Consolidated Balance Sheets on a gross basis as interest rate swap assets and interest rate swap liabilities. Detail on the Company’s fair value of interest rate derivatives on a gross and net basis as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, is as follows:
 
 
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
Interest rate swaps classified as:
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Gross derivative assets
 
$
24,420

 
$
21,605

Gross derivative liabilities
 

 

Net derivative assets
 
$
24,420

 
$
21,605


The gross derivative assets are included in Other assets and the gross derivative liabilities are included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. All of the Company’s outstanding interest rate swap agreements for the periods presented were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate derivatives is determined using market standard valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. These inputs are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as, and that qualify as, cash flow hedges is recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and is reclassified into earnings as interest expense in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.

The effective portion of the Company’s interest rate swaps that was recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
(Interest Rate Swaps)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps
 
$
4,976

 
$
19,081

 
$
(7,612
)
Amortization (accretion) of interest rate swaps to interest expense
 
(2,161
)
 
4,961

 
9,598

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps, net
 
$
2,815

 
$
24,042

 
$
1,986


The Company estimates that $9.6 million will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income as a decrease to interest expense over the next twelve months. No gain or loss was recognized related to hedge ineffectiveness

F-26



or to amounts excluded from effectiveness testing on the Company’s cash flow hedges during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Non-Designated (Mark-to Market) Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not have any non-designated hedges.

Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with its derivative counterparties that contain a provision whereby if the Company defaults on certain of its indebtedness and the indebtedness has been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. If the Company were to breach any of the contractual provisions of the derivative contracts, it would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value including accrued interest.

7. Debt Obligations
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had the following indebtedness outstanding:
 
 
Carrying Value as of
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
Stated
Interest
Rate(1)
 
Scheduled
Maturity
Date
Secured loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured loans(2)(3)
 
$
902,717

 
$
1,312,292

 
4.40% – 7.89%
 
2018 – 2024
Net unamortized premium
 
15,321

 
25,189

 
 
 
 
Net unamortized debt issuance costs
 
(93
)
 
(387
)
 
 
 
 
Total secured loans, net
 
$
917,945

 
$
1,337,094

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes payable
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unsecured notes(4)
 
$
3,218,453

 
$
2,318,453

 
3.25% – 7.97%
 
2022 – 2029
Net unamortized discount
 
(13,485
)
 
(9,097
)
 
 
 
 
Net unamortized debt issuance costs
 
(22,476
)
 
(17,402
)
 
 
 
 
Total notes payable, net
 
$
3,182,492

 
$
2,291,954

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unsecured Credit Facility and term loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unsecured Credit Facility(5)
 
$
685,000

 
$
1,622,000

 
2.73%
 
2018 – 2021
Unsecured $600 Million Term Loan(6)
 
600,000

 
600,000

 
2.78%
 
2019
Unsecured $300 Million Term Loan(7)
 
300,000

 

 
3.26%
 
2024
Net unamortized debt issuance costs
 
(9,199
)
 
(12,159
)
 
 
 
 
Total Unsecured Credit Facility and term loans
 
$
1,575,801

 
$
2,209,841

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total debt obligations, net
 
$
5,676,238

 
$
5,838,889

 
 
 
 
(1) 
The stated interest rates are as of December 31, 2017 and do not include the impact of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements (described below).
(2) 
The Company’s secured loans are collateralized by certain properties and the equity interests of certain subsidiaries. These properties had a carrying value as of December 31, 2017 of approximately $1.7 billion.
(3) 
The weighted average stated interest rate on the Company’s fixed rate secured loans was 6.16% as of December 31, 2017.
(4) 
The weighted average stated interest rate on the Company’s unsecured notes was 3.81% as of December 31, 2017.
(5) 
Effective November 1, 2016, the Company has in place an interest rate swap agreement that converts the variable interest rate on $185.0 million of a term loan under the Company’s senior unsecured credit facility agreement, as amended July 25, 2016, (the “Unsecured Credit Facility”) to a fixed interest rate of 0.82% (plus a spread of 135 bps) through July 31, 2018, and three interest rate swap agreements that convert the variable interest rate on a $500.0 million term loan under the Unsecured Credit Facility to a fixed, combined interest rate of 1.11% (plus a spread of 135 bps) through July 30, 2021.
(6) 
Effective November 1, 2016, the Company has in place two interest rate swap agreements that convert the variable interest rate on $200.0 million of the Company’s $600 million term loan agreement, as amended July 25, 2016, (the “$600 Million Term Loan”) to a fixed, combined interest rate of 0.82% (plus a spread of 140 bps) through July 31, 2018, and three interest rate swap agreements that convert the variable interest rate on $400.0 million of the $600 Million Term Loan to a fixed, combined interest rate of 0.88% (plus a spread of 140 bps) through March 18, 2019.

F-27


(7) 
Effective July 28, 2017, the Company has in place an interest rate swap agreement that converts the variable interest rate on $115.0 million of the $300 Million Term Loan (defined below) to a fixed, combined interest rate of 0.82% (plus a spread of 190 bps) through July 31, 2018.

2017 Debt Transactions
In March 2017, the Operating Partnership issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.90% Senior Notes due 2027 (the “2027 Notes”), the proceeds of which were utilized to repay outstanding indebtedness, including borrowings under the Company’s Unsecured Credit Facility, and for general corporate purposes.  The 2027 Notes bear interest at a rate of 3.90% per annum, payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing September 15, 2017. The 2027 Notes will mature on March 15, 2027. The 2027 Notes are the Operating Partnership’s unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of the Operating Partnership’s existing and future senior unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. The Operating Partnership may redeem the 2027 Notes at any time in whole or from time to time in part at the applicable make-whole redemption price specified in the Indenture with respect to the 2027 Notes.  If the 2027 Notes are redeemed on or after December 15, 2026 (three months prior to the maturity date), the redemption price will be equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2027 Notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to, but not including, the redemption date.

In June 2017, the Operating Partnership issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.65% Senior Notes due 2024 (the “2024 Notes”), the proceeds of which were utilized to repay outstanding indebtedness, including borrowings under the Company’s Unsecured Credit Facility, and for general corporate purposes.  The 2024 Notes bear interest at a rate of 3.65% per annum, payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing December 15, 2017. The 2024 Notes will mature on June 15, 2024. The 2024 Notes are the Operating Partnership’s unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of the Operating Partnership’s existing and future senior unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. The Operating Partnership may redeem the 2024 Notes at any time in whole or from time to time in part at the applicable make-whole redemption price specified in the Indenture with respect to the 2024 Notes.  If the 2024 Notes are redeemed on or after April 15, 2024 (two months prior to the maturity date), the redemption price will be equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2024 Notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to, but not including, the redemption date.

In July 2017, the Operating Partnership entered into a $300.0 million variable rate unsecured term loan facility (the “$300 Million Term Loan”). The $300 Million Term Loan has a seven-year term maturing on July 26, 2024, with no available extension options, and bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 190 basis points (based on the Operating Partnership’s current credit ratings). Proceeds from the $300 Million Term Loan were used to prepay $300.0 million of an unsecured term loan under the Company’s Unsecured Credit Facility maturing July 31, 2018.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repaid at total of $815.0 million of unsecured term loan debt under the Company’s Unsecured Credit Facility and $389.1 million of secured loans, resulting in a $0.5 million gain on extinguishment of debt, net. These repayments were funded primarily with proceeds from the issuance of the 2027 Notes and 2024 Notes and the execution of the $300 Million Term Loan. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repaid $122.0 million, net of borrowings on the Revolving Facility.

Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s unsecured debt agreements, the Company among other things is subject to maintenance of various financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2017.














F-28


Debt Maturities
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had accrued interest of $35.9 million and $34.1 million outstanding, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, scheduled amortization and maturities of the Company’s outstanding debt obligations were as follows:
Year ending December 31,
 
 
2018
 
$
203,118

2019
 
618,679

2020
 
672,695

2021
 
686,225

2022
 
500,000

Thereafter
 
3,025,453

Total debt maturities
 
5,706,170

Net unamortized premiums and discounts
 
1,836

Net unamortized debt issuance costs
 
(31,768
)
Total debt obligations, net
 
$
5,676,238

As of the date the financial statements were issued, the Company’s scheduled debt maturities for the next 12 months are comprised of an unsecured term loan under the Company’s Unsecured Credit Facility and a non-recourse secured loan. The Company has sufficient capacity under the Unsecured Credit Facility to satisfy these scheduled debt maturities.

8. Fair Value Disclosures
All financial instruments of the Company are reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at amounts which, in management’s judgment, reasonably approximate their fair values, except those instruments listed below:
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Carrying
Amounts
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amounts
 
Fair
Value
 
 
Secured loans
$
917,945

 
$
963,702

 
$
1,337,094

 
$
1,410,698

 
Notes payable
3,182,492

 
3,224,877

 
2,291,954

 
2,302,048

 
Unsecured Credit Facility and term loans
1,575,801

 
1,586,206

 
2,209,841

 
2,223,807

 
Total debt obligations, net
$
5,676,238

 
$
5,774,785

 
$
5,838,889

 
$
5,936,553

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, a fair value hierarchy is included in GAAP that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs that are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

The valuation methodology used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s debt obligations is based on a discounted cash flow analysis, with assumptions that include credit spreads, estimated property values, loan amounts and debt maturities. Based on these inputs, the Company has determined that the valuations of its debt obligations are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Such fair value estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized upon disposition.

Recurring Fair Value
The Company’s marketable securities and interest rate derivatives are measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value of marketable securities is based primarily on publicly traded market values in active markets and is classified within Level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 6 for fair value information regarding the Company’s interest rate derivatives.

F-29


The following table presents the placement in the fair value hierarchy of assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2017
 
Balance
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Marketable securities(1)
$
28,006

 
$
725

 
$
27,281

 
$

Interest rate derivatives
$
24,420

 
$

 
$
24,420

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2016
 
Balance
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Marketable securities(1)
$
25,573

 
$
5,679

 
$
19,894

 
$

Interest rate derivatives
$
21,605

 
$

 
$
21,605

 
$

(1) 
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, marketable securities included $0.2 million and $0.1 million of net unrealized losses, respectively.

Non-Recurring Fair Value
On a non-recurring basis, the Company evaluates the carrying value of its properties when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Fair value is determined by purchase price offers, market comparable data, third party appraisals or by discounted cash flow analysis. These cash flows are comprised of unobservable inputs which include forecasted rental revenue and expenses based upon market conditions and future expectations. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these models are based upon unobservable rates that we believe to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties. Based on these inputs, the Company has determined that the valuations of these properties are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents the placement in the fair value hierarchy of assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The table includes information related to properties remeasured to fair value as a result of impairment testing:

 
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2017
 
Balance
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Properties(1)(2)
$
73,303

 
$

 
$

 
$
73,303

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2016
 
Balance
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Properties(3)
$
135

 
$

 
$

 
$
135

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) 
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized $28.0 million of impairment based upon offers from third party buyers and $12.1 million of impairment based upon discounted cash flow analysis. The capitalization rates (ranging from 7.0% to 8.5%) and discount rates (ranging from 7.9% to 9.5%) which were utilized in the analysis were based upon unobservable rates that the Company believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for each respective investment.

F-30


(2) 
The carrying value of properties remeasured to fair value during the year ended December 31, 2017 include: (i) $7.8 million related to The Plaza at Salmon Run, (ii) $1.9 million related to Smith’s, (iii) $46.9 million related to The Manchester Collection, (iv) $2.4 million related to Fashion Square, and (v) $14.3 million related to Crossroads Centre.
(3) 
The carrying value of a parcel at Country Hills Shopping Center was remeasured to fair value during the year ended December 31, 2016.

9. Revenue Recognition
Future minimum annual base rents as of December 31, 2017 to be received over the next five years pursuant to the terms of non-cancelable operating leases are included in the table below, assuming that no leases are renewed and no renewal options are exercised. Future minimum annual base rents also do not include payments which may be received under certain leases for percentage rent or the reimbursement of operating expenses such as real estate taxes, insurance and other common area expenses.
Year ending December 31,
 
 
2018
 
$
886,593

2019
 
778,828

2020
 
652,304

2021
 
531,335

2022
 
412,230

Thereafter
 
1,442,980

The Company recognized $7.1 million, $5.9 million and $3.6 million of rental income based on percentage rent for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the estimated allowance associated with Company’s outstanding rent receivables, included in Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets was $12.1 million and $13.2 million, respectively. In addition, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, receivables associated with the effects of recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis were $113.9 million and $98.1 million, respectively net of the estimated allowance of $5.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively.

10. Equity and Capital
ATM
In 2015, the Parent Company entered into an at-the-market equity offering program (“ATM”) through which the Parent Company may sell from time to time up to an aggregate of $400.0 million of its common stock through sales agents over a three-year period. No shares have been issued under the ATM, and as a result, $400.0 million of common stock remained available for issuance under the ATM as of December 31, 2017. The ATM is scheduled to expire on June 8, 2018, unless extended by the Parent Company and the sales agents.

Share Repurchase Program
On December 5, 2017, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program for up to $400.0 million of the Company’s common stock. The program is scheduled to expire on December 5, 2019, unless extended by the Board of Directors. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repurchased approximately 0.3 million shares of common stock under the program at an average price per share of $17.96 for a total of approximately $5.9 million.

Common Stock
In connection with the vesting of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the Company’s equity-based compensation plan, the Company withholds shares to satisfy statutory minimum tax withholding obligations. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company withheld 0.1 million shares.

Dividends and Distributions
Because Brixmor Property Group, Inc. is a holding company and has no material assets other than its ownership of BPG Sub and no material operations other than those conducted by BPG Sub, distributions are funded as follows:

first, the Operating Partnership makes distributions to those of its partners which are holders of OP Units, including BPG Sub. When the Operating Partnership makes such distributions, in addition to BPG Sub and its wholly owned subsidiaries, the other partners of the Operating Partnership are also entitled to receive equivalent distributions on their partnership interests in the Operating Partnership on a pro rata basis;

F-31


second, BPG Sub distributes to Brixmor Property Group Inc. its share of such distributions; and
third, Brixmor Property Group Inc. distributes the amount authorized by its Board of Directors and declared by Brixmor Property Group Inc. to its common stockholders on a pro rata basis.

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company declared common stock dividends and OP Unit distributions of $1.055 per share/unit, $0.995 per share/unit and $0.92 per share/unit, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had declared but unpaid common stock dividends and OP Unit distributions of $85.6 million and $80.6 million, respectively. These amounts are included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Non-controlling interests
As of December 31, 2017, the Parent Company beneficially owned, through its direct and indirect interest in BPG Sub and the General Partner, 100.0% of the outstanding OP Units. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company exchanged 0.4 million shares and 4.8 million shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock for an equal number of outstanding OP Units held by Blackstone and certain members of the Parent Company’s current and former management.

During the years ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, Blackstone completed multiple secondary offerings of the Parent Company’s common stock. In connection with these offerings, during the years ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, the Company incurred $0.9 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of expenses which are included in Other on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Preferred Stock
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company redeemed all 125 shares of BPG Sub Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock for the stated liquidation preference of $10,000 per share plus accrued but unpaid dividends.

11. Stock Based Compensation
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan provides for a maximum of 15.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued for qualified and non-qualified options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and RSUs, OP Units, performance awards and other stock-based awards.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company granted RSUs to certain employees. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company granted RSUs to certain employees, or at the election of certain employees, long-term incentive plan units (“LTIP Units”) in the Operating Partnership. The RSUs and LTIP Units are divided into multiple tranches, with each tranche subject to separate performance-based, market-based and service-based vesting conditions. Each award contains a threshold, target, and maximum number of units in respect of each tranche. The number of units actually earned for each tranche is determined based on performance during a specified performance period, and the earned units are then further subject to service-based vesting conditions. The aggregate number of RSUs and LTIP Units granted, assuming that the target level of performance is achieved, was 0.6 million, 0.8 million and 0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, with vesting periods ranging from one to five years. For the performance-based and service-based RSUs and LTIP Units granted under the Plan, fair value is based on the Company grant date stock price. For the market-based RSUs and LTIP Units granted during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company calculated the grant date fair values per unit using a Monte Carlo simulation based on the probability of satisfying the market performance hurdles over the remainder of the performance period based on the Company’s historical common stock performance relative to the other companies within the FTSE NAREIT Equity Shopping Centers Index as well as the following significant assumptions: (i) volatility of 22.0% to 23.0% and 23.5% to 26.5%, respectively; (ii) a weighted average risk-free interest rate of 1.2% to 1.41% and 1.0%, respectively; and (iii) the Company’s weighted average common stock dividend yield of 4.0% to 4.6% and 3.8%, respectively. 







F-32


Information with respect to RSUs and LTIP Units for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in thousands):
 
Restricted Shares
 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2014
1,821

 
$
29,641

Vested
(1,341
)
 
(19,828
)
Granted
735

 
16,766

Forfeited
(43
)
 
(930
)
Outstanding, December 31, 2015
1,172

 
25,649

Vested
(519
)
 
(12,550
)
Granted
881

 
18,842

Forfeited
(519
)
 
(8,861
)
Outstanding, December 31, 2016
1,015

 
23,080

Vested
(343
)
 
(7,614
)
Granted
633

 
12,762

Forfeited
(69
)
 
(1,254
)
Outstanding, December 31, 2017
1,236

 
$
26,974


During the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company recognized $10.5 million of equity compensation expense. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized $11.6 million of equity compensation expense, which included the reversal of $2.6 million of previously recognized expense as a result of forfeitures and the acceleration of $2.7 million of expense associated with the issuance of shares, both in connection with the separation of certain Company executives. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recognized $23.3 million of equity compensation expense, which included $9.9 million of expense associated with the vesting of awards issued prior to the IPO as a result of it becoming probable that the Company’s pre-IPO owners would receive a 15% internal rate of return on their investment. These amounts are included in General and administrative expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $11.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock compensation expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.1 years.

F-33


12.     Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net income attributable to the Company’s common stockholders, including any participating securities, by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Certain restricted shares issued pursuant to the Company’s share-based compensation program are considered participating securities, as such shares have rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends. Fully-diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into shares of common stock. Unvested RSUs are not allocated net losses and/or any excess of dividends declared over net income, as such amounts are allocated entirely to the common stockholders.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the EPS calculations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Computation of Basic Earnings Per Share:
 
 
 
 
 
 Net income
$
300,369

 
$
278,142

 
$
197,536

 Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
(76
)
 
(2,514
)
 
(3,816
)
 Non-forfeitable dividends on unvested restricted shares
(37
)
 
(40
)
 
(23
)
 Preferred stock dividends
(39
)
 
(150
)
 
(150
)
 Net income attributable to the Company’s common stockholders for basic earnings per share
$
300,217

 
$
275,438

 
$
193,547

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Weighted average number shares outstanding – basic
304,834

 
301,601

 
298,004

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Basic Earnings Per Share Attributable to the Company’s Common Stockholders:
 
 
 
 
 
 Net income
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

 

 

 

Computation of Diluted Earnings Per Share:
 
 
 
 
 
 Net income attributable to the Company’s common stockholders for basic earnings per share
$
300,217

 
$
275,438

 
$
193,547

 Allocation of net income to dilutive convertible non-controlling interests
76

 
2,514

 
3,816

 Net income attributable to the Company’s common stockholders for diluted earnings per share
$
300,293

 
$
277,952

 
$
197,363

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Weighted average shares outstanding – basic
304,834

 
301,601

 
298,004

 Effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
 
 
    Conversion of OP Units
79

 
3,000

 
5,988

    Equity awards
368

 
459

 
1,025

 Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted
305,281

 
305,060

 
305,017

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Diluted Earnings Per Share Attributable to the Company’s Common Stockholders:
 
 
 
 
 
 Net income
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65



F-34


13. Earnings per Unit
Basic earnings per unit is calculated by dividing net income attributable to the Operating Partnership’s common unitholders, including any participating securities, by the weighted average number of partnership common units outstanding for the period. Certain restricted units issued pursuant to the Company’s share-based compensation program are considered participating securities, as such shares have rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends. Fully-diluted earnings per unit reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common units were exercised or converted into common units. Unvested RSUs are not allocated net losses and/or any excess of dividends declared over net income, as such amounts are allocated entirely to the Operating Partnership’s common units.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the earnings per unit calculations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Computation of Basic Earnings Per Unit:
 
 
 
 
 
 Net income attributable to Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
$
300,369

 
$
278,142

 
$
197,536

 Non-forfeitable dividends on unvested restricted units
(37
)
 
(40
)
 
(23
)
 Net income attributable to the Operating Partnership’s common units for basic earnings per unit
$
300,332

 
$
278,102

 
$
197,513

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Weighted average number common units outstanding – basic
304,913

 
304,600

 
303,992

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Basic Earnings Per Unit Attributable to the Operating Partnership’s Common Units:
 
 
 
 
 
 Net income
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65

 
 
 
 
 
 
Computation of Diluted Earnings Per Unit:
 
 
 
 
 
 Net income attributable to the Operating Partnership’s common units for diluted earnings per unit
$
300,332

 
$
278,102

 
$
197,513

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Weighted average common units outstanding – basic
304,913

 
304,600

 
303,992

 Effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
 
 
    Equity awards
368

 
459

 
1,025

 Weighted average common units outstanding – diluted
305,281

 
305,059

 
305,017

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Diluted Earnings Per Unit Attributable to the Operating Partnership’s Common Units:
 
 
 
 
 
 Net income
$
0.98

 
$
0.91

 
$
0.65



F-35


14. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
Except as described below, the Company is not presently involved in any material litigation arising outside the ordinary course of business. However, the Company is involved in routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which the Company believes, individually or in the aggregate, taking into account existing reserves, will have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows, or financial position.

On February 8, 2016, the Company issued a press release and filed a Form 8-K reporting the completion of a review by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors that began after the Company received information in late December 2015 through its established compliance processes. The Audit Committee review led the Board of Directors to conclude that specific Company accounting and financial reporting personnel, in certain instances, were smoothing income items, both up and down, between reporting periods in an effort to achieve consistent quarterly same property net operating income growth.

As a result of the Audit Committee review and the conclusions reached by the Board of Directors, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, its President and Chief Financial Officer, its Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer, and an accounting employee all resigned. Following these resignations the Company appointed a new Interim Chief Executive Officer and President, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Chief Accounting Officer. A new Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer were appointed effective May 20, 2016. A new Chief Accounting Officer was appointed effective March 8, 2017.

Prior to the Company’s February 8, 2016 announcement, the Company voluntarily reported these matters to the SEC.  As a result, the SEC and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York are conducting investigations of certain aspects of the Company’s financial reporting and accounting for prior periods and the Company is cooperating fully.

On December 13, 2017, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted final approval of the settlement of the previously disclosed putative securities class action complaint filed in March 2016 by the Westchester Putnam Counties Heavy & Highway Laborers Local 60 Benefit Funds related to the review conducted by the Audit Committee of the Company. Pursuant to the approved settlement, without any admission of liability, the Company will pay $28 million to settle the claims. This amount is within the coverage amount of the Company’s applicable insurance policies. The settlement provides for the release of, among others, the Company, its subsidiaries, and their respective current and former officers, directors and employees from the claims that were or could have been asserted in the class action litigation. Certain institutional investors elected to opt out of the settlement and will not be bound by the release or receive any settlement proceeds. The Company expects that the resolution of any future related claims asserted by such opt-outs will also be within the coverage amount of the Company’s applicable insurance policies.

Based on current information, the Company accrued $28.0 million as of December 31, 2017 with respect to the settlement agreement. This amount is included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Because the settlement amount is within the coverage amount of the Company’s applicable insurance policies, the Company accrued a receivable of $28.0 million as of December 31, 2017. This amount is included in Accounts receivable, net in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
















F-36


Leasing commitments
The Company periodically enters into ground leases for neighborhood and community shopping centers that it operates and enters into office leases for administrative space. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized rent expense associated with these leases of $7.5 million, $8.3 million and $9.4 million, respectively. Minimum annual rental commitments associated with these leases during the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
Year ending December 31,
 
 
2018
 
$
7,092

2019
 
7,010

2020
 
7,027

2021
 
7,231

2022
 
7,215

Thereafter
 
71,860

Total minimum annual rental commitments
 
$
107,435


Insurance captive
The Company has a wholly owned captive insurance company, Brixmor Incap, LLC (“Incap”). Incap underwrites the first layer of general liability insurance programs for the Company’s Portfolio. The Company formed Incap as part of its overall risk management program and to stabilize insurance costs, manage exposure and recoup expenses through the functions of the captive program. The Company has capitalized Incap in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements. Incap established annual premiums based on projections derived from the past loss experience of the Company’s properties. An actuarial analysis is performed to estimate future projected claims, related deductibles and projected expenses necessary to fund associated risk management programs. Premiums paid to Incap may be adjusted based on this estimate and may be reimbursed by tenants pursuant to specific lease terms.

Activity in the reserve for losses for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
 
 
Year End December 31,
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at the beginning of the year
 
$
15,045

 
$
14,393

 
 
 
 
 
 
Incurred related to:
 
 
 
 
 
Current year
 
4,205

 
4,625

 
Prior years
 
(3,157
)
 
(828
)
Total incurred
 
1,048

 
3,797

 
 
 
 

 
 

Paid related to:
 
 
 
 
 
Current year
 
(299
)
 
(171
)
 
Prior years
 
(2,499
)
 
(2,974
)
Total paid
 
(2,798
)
 
(3,145
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at the end of the year
 
$
13,295

 
$
15,045


Environmental matters
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, the Company may be considered an owner or operator of real property or may have arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances. As a result, the Company may be liable for certain costs including removal, remediation, government fines and injuries to persons and property. The Company does not believe that any resulting liability from such matters will have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows, or financial position.

15. Income Taxes
The Parent Company has elected to qualify as a REIT in accordance with the Code. To qualify as a REIT, the Parent Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and

F-37


excluding net capital gains, to its stockholders. It is management’s intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Parent Company’s REIT status.

As a REIT, the Parent Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that distributions to its stockholders equal at least the amount of its REIT taxable income as defined under the Code. The Parent Company conducts substantially all of its operations through the Operating Partnership which is organized as a limited partnership and treated as a pass-through entity for U.S. federal tax purposes. Therefore, U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income do not materially impact the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

If the Parent Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to U.S. federal taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Parent Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company is subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income. In addition, taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through a TRS are subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes.

The Company incurred income and non-income taxes of $2.4 million, $3.3 million and $4.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recognized $4.7 million of income related to net adjustments to pre-IPO tax reserves and receivables. These amounts are included in Other on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

16. Related-Party Transactions
In the ordinary course of conducting its business, the Company enters into agreements with its affiliates in relation to the leasing and management of its and/or its related parties’ real estate assets.

Pursuant to the employment agreement dated April 12, 2016 between the Company and James M. Taylor, the Company’s chief executive officer, the Company was contingently obligated to purchase Mr. Taylor’s former residence for an amount equal to the appraised value of the residence as of a date within 120 days of the execution of the employment agreement.  Based upon the contingency being triggered in May 2017, the Company purchased the residence on July 5, 2017 for the appraised value of $4.4 million. The Company intends to sell the residence. Based on an August 2017 appraisal, the value of the residence was $3.9 million.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no material receivables from or payables to related parties.

17. Retirement Plan
The Company has a Retirement and 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”) covering officers and employees of the Company. Participants in the Savings Plan may elect to contribute a portion of their earnings to the Savings Plan and the Company makes a matching contribution to the Savings Plan to a maximum of 3% of the employee’s eligible compensation. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s expense for the Savings Plan was approximately $1.2 million, $1.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively. These amounts are included in General and administrative in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.


F-38


18. Supplemental Financial Information (unaudited)
The following table summarizes selected Quarterly Financial Data for the Company on a historical basis for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and has been derived from the accompanying consolidated financial statements (in thousands except per share and per unit data):

Brixmor Property Group Inc.
 
First Quarter
 
Second Quarter
 
Third Quarter
 
Fourth Quarter
Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
$
325,806

 
$
322,818

 
$
314,496

 
$
320,060

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
71,579

 
$
75,399

 
$
83,380

 
$
69,896

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common stockholders per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Basic(1)
$
0.23

 
$
0.25

 
$
0.27

 
$
0.23

     Diluted(1)
$
0.23

 
$
0.25

 
$
0.27

 
$
0.23

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
$
323,104

 
$
310,057

 
$
318,577

 
$
324,034

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
60,477

 
$
64,456

 
$
57,492

 
$
93,053

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common stockholders per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Basic(1)
$
0.20

 
$
0.21

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.31

     Diluted(1)
$
0.20

 
$
0.21

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.31

(1)  
The sum of the quarterly Basic and Diluted earnings per share may not equal the Basic and Diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 due to rounding.

Brixmor Operating Partnership LP
 
First Quarter
 
Second Quarter
 
Third Quarter
 
Fourth Quarter
Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
$
325,806

 
$
322,818

 
$
314,496

 
$
320,060

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to partnership common units
$
71,655

 
$
75,438

 
$
83,380

 
$
69,896

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common unitholders per unit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Basic(1)
$
0.23

 
$
0.25

 
$
0.27

 
$
0.23

     Diluted(1)
$
0.23

 
$
0.25

 
$
0.27

 
$
0.23

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
$
323,104

 
$
310,057

 
$
318,577

 
$
324,034

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to partnership common units
$
61,549

 
$
65,470

 
$
57,805

 
$
93,318

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to common unitholders per unit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Basic(1)
$
0.20

 
$
0.21

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.31

     Diluted(1)
$
0.20

 
$
0.21

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.31

(1)  
The sum of the quarterly Basic and Diluted earnings per share may not equal the Basic and Diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 due to rounding.
    
19. Subsequent Events
In preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring after December 31, 2017 for recognition or disclosure purposes. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events from December 31, 2017 through the date the financial statements were issued.


F-39



BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)


 
 
 
 Additions
 
Deductions
 
 
 
Balance at Beginning of Period
 
Charged / (Credited) to
Bad Debt Expense
 
Accounts Receivable
Written Off
 
Balance at
End of
Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
Year ended December 31, 2017
$
16,756

 
$
5,323

 
$
(4,874
)
 
$
17,205

Year ended December 31, 2016
$
16,587

 
$
9,182

 
$
(9,013
)
 
$
16,756

Year ended December 31, 2015
$
14,070

 
$
9,540

 
$
(7,023
)
 
$
16,587



F-40



BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subsequent to Acquisition
 
Gross Amount at Which Carried
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Life on Which Depreciated - Latest Income Statement
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
 
at the Close of the Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Encumbrances
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
Total
 
Accumulated Depreciation
 
Year Constructed(1)
 
Date Acquired
 
Winchester Plaza
Huntsville, AL
 
$

 
$
2,634

 
$
12,105

 
$
434

 
$
2,634

 
$
12,539

 
$
15,173

 
$
(2,105
)
 
2006
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Springdale
Mobile, AL
 

 
7,460

 
33,085

 
4,452

 
7,460

 
37,537

 
44,997

 
(12,155
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Payton Park
Sylacauga, AL
 
(9,372
)
 
1,830

 
14,335

 
435

 
1,830

 
14,770

 
16,600

 
(5,222
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Glendale Galleria
Glendale, AZ
 

 
4,070

 
6,894

 
9,127

 
4,070

 
16,021

 
20,091

 
(2,608
)
 
1991
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Northmall Centre
Tucson, AZ
 

 
3,140

 
17,966

 
1,816

 
3,140

 
19,782

 
22,922

 
(5,173
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Applegate Ranch Shopping Center
Atwater, CA
 

 
4,033

 
25,510

 
1,519

 
4,033

 
27,029

 
31,062

 
(5,790
)
 
2006
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Bakersfield Plaza
Bakersfield, CA
 

 
4,000

 
24,929

 
10,482

 
4,502

 
34,909

 
39,411

 
(9,950
)
 
1970
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Carmen Plaza
Camarillo, CA
 

 
5,410

 
19,522

 
952

 
5,410

 
20,474

 
25,884

 
(5,900
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Plaza Rio Vista
Cathedral, CA
 

 
2,465

 
12,575

 
100

 
2,465

 
12,675

 
15,140

 
(2,218
)
 
2005
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Clovis Commons
Clovis, CA
 

 
12,943

 
38,688

 
1,120

 
12,943

 
39,808

 
52,751

 
(8,961
)
 
2004
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Cudahy Plaza
Cudahy, CA
 

 
4,490

 
13,111

 
1,384

 
4,778

 
14,207

 
18,985

 
(3,597
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
University Mall
Davis, CA
 

 
4,270

 
18,056

 
1,502

 
4,270

 
19,558

 
23,828

 
(5,238
)
 
1964
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Felicita Plaza
Escondido, CA
 

 
4,280

 
12,434

 
947

 
4,280

 
13,381

 
17,661

 
(3,690
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Felicita Town Center
Escondido, CA
 

 
11,231

 
31,381

 
214

 
11,231

 
31,595

 
42,826

 
(1,888
)
 
1987
 
Dec-16
 
40 years
Arbor - Broadway Faire
Fresno, CA
 
(9,540
)
 
5,940

 
33,885

 
2,295

 
5,940

 
36,180

 
42,120

 
(10,208
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Lompoc Center
Lompoc, CA
 

 
4,670

 
15,965

 
1,975

 
4,670

 
17,940

 
22,610

 
(6,893
)
 
1960
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Briggsmore Plaza
Modesto, CA
 

 
2,140

 
11,224

 
2,787

 
2,140

 
14,011

 
16,151

 
(3,628
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Montebello Plaza
Montebello, CA
 

 
13,360

 
32,554

 
6,943

 
13,360

 
39,497

 
52,857

 
(11,197
)
 
1974
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
California Oaks Center
Murrieta, CA
 

 
5,180

 
13,666

 
5,605

 
5,180

 
19,271

 
24,451

 
(3,399
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Esplanade Shopping Center
Oxnard, CA
 

 
6,630

 
60,377

 
15,922

 
16,229

 
66,700

 
82,929

 
(15,495
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Pacoima Center
Pacoima, CA
 

 
7,050

 
15,932

 
672

 
7,050

 
16,604

 
23,654

 
(6,530
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Paradise Plaza
Paradise, CA
 

 
1,820

 
8,711

 
933

 
1,820

 
9,644

 
11,464

 
(3,670
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Metro 580
Pleasanton, CA
 

 
10,500

 
19,243

 
1,661

 
10,500

 
20,904

 
31,404

 
(5,815
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Rose Pavilion
Pleasanton, CA
 

 
19,619

 
60,325

 
8,494

 
19,619

 
68,819

 
88,438

 
(13,159
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Puente Hills Town Center
Rowland Heights, CA
 

 
15,670

 
39,159

 
3,930

 
15,670

 
43,089

 
58,759

 
(10,039
)
 
1984
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
San Bernardino Center
San Bernardino, CA
 

 
2,510

 
9,537

 
191

 
2,510

 
9,728

 
12,238

 
(4,979
)
 
2003
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Ocean View Plaza
San Clemente, CA
 

 
15,750

 
29,826

 
1,527

 
15,750

 
31,353

 
47,103

 
(7,773
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Plaza By The Sea
San Clemente, CA
 

 
9,607

 
5,461

 
44

 
9,607

 
5,505

 
15,112

 
(32
)
 
1976
 
Dec-17
 
40 years
Village at Mira Mesa
San Diego, CA
 

 
14,870

 
70,974

 
5,480

 
14,870

 
76,454

 
91,324

 
(16,213
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
San Dimas Plaza
San Dimas, CA
 

 
11,490

 
20,570

 
7,505

 
15,100

 
24,465

 
39,565

 
(5,477
)
 
1986
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Bristol Plaza
Santa Ana, CA
 

 
9,110

 
21,169

 
2,975

 
9,722

 
23,532

 
33,254

 
(5,664
)
 
2003
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Gateway Plaza
Santa Fe Springs, CA
 

 
9,980

 
30,135

 
1,185

 
9,980

 
31,320

 
41,300

 
(8,612
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Santa Paula Center
Santa Paula, CA
 

 
3,520

 
17,896

 
1,071

 
3,520

 
18,967

 
22,487

 
(6,229
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Vail Ranch Center
Temecula, CA
 

 
3,750

 
22,137

 
1,553

 
3,750

 
23,690

 
27,440

 
(6,883
)
 
2003
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Country Hills Shopping Center
Torrance, CA
 

 
3,630

 
8,683

 
(217
)
 
3,630

 
8,466

 
12,096

 
(2,031
)
 
1977
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Upland Town Square
Upland, CA
 

 
9,051

 
23,171

 
33

 
9,051

 
23,204

 
32,255

 
(230
)
 
1994
 
Nov-17
 
40 years
Gateway Plaza - Vallejo
Vallejo, CA
 

 
11,880

 
72,127

 
17,706

 
12,946

 
88,767

 
101,713

 
(21,694
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Arvada Plaza
Arvada, CO
 

 
1,160

 
7,378

 
430

 
1,160

 
7,808

 
8,968

 
(3,360
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Arapahoe Crossings
Aurora, CO
 

 
13,676

 
54,851

 
8,687

 
13,676

 
63,538

 
77,214

 
(11,776
)
 
1996
 
Jul-13
 
40 years
Aurora Plaza
Aurora, CO
 

 
3,910

 
9,146

 
1,735

 
3,910

 
10,881

 
14,791

 
(5,235
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Villa Monaco
Denver, CO
 

 
3,090

 
6,282

 
3,357

 
3,090

 
9,639

 
12,729

 
(2,258
)
 
1978
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Superior Marketplace
Superior, CO
 
(16,387
)
 
7,090

 
35,654

 
3,838

 
7,090

 
39,492

 
46,582

 
(9,773
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Westminster City Center
Westminster, CO
 

 
6,040

 
42,944

 
9,468

 
6,040

 
52,412

 
58,452

 
(12,215
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Freshwater - Stateline Plaza
Enfield, CT
 

 
3,350

 
30,149

 
1,662

 
3,350

 
31,811

 
35,161

 
(9,455
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
The Shoppes at Fox Run
Glastonbury, CT
 

 
3,550

 
22,693

 
2,986

 
3,600

 
25,629

 
29,229

 
(6,488
)
 
1974
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Groton Square
Groton, CT
 

 
2,730

 
28,034

 
1,552

 
2,730

 
29,586

 
32,316

 
(8,342
)
 
1987
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Parkway Plaza
Hamden, CT
 

 
4,100

 
7,709

 
137

 
4,100

 
7,846

 
11,946

 
(2,555
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
The Manchester Collection
Manchester, CT
 

 
9,180

 
51,850

 
(3,900
)
 
9,180

 
47,950

 
57,130

 
(12,283
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Chamberlain Plaza
Meriden, CT
 
(2,981
)
 
1,260

 
4,480

 
774

 
1,260

 
5,254

 
6,514

 
(1,919
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Turnpike Plaza
Newington, CT
 

 
3,920

 
23,847

 
20

 
3,920

 
23,867

 
27,787

 
(6,849
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
North Haven Crossing
North Haven, CT
 
(9,948
)
 
5,430

 
15,959

 
1,459

 
5,430

 
17,418

 
22,848

 
(4,461
)
 
1993
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Christmas Tree Plaza
Orange, CT
 
(569
)
 
4,870

 
14,844

 
925

 
4,870

 
15,769

 
20,639

 
(4,836
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years

F-41



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subsequent to Acquisition
 
Gross Amount at Which Carried
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Life on Which Depreciated - Latest Income Statement
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
 
at the Close of the Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Encumbrances
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
Total
 
Accumulated Depreciation
 
Year Constructed(1)
 
Date Acquired
 
Stratford Square
Stratford, CT
 

 
5,970

 
11,758

 
6,865

 
5,970

 
18,623

 
24,593

 
(3,948
)
 
1984
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Torrington Plaza
Torrington, CT
 

 
2,180

 
12,967

 
3,284

 
2,180

 
16,251

 
18,431

 
(4,184
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Waterbury Plaza
Waterbury, CT
 
(15,554
)
 
5,030

 
17,366

 
1,650

 
5,030

 
19,016

 
24,046

 
(6,074
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Waterford Commons
Waterford, CT
 
(23,979
)
 
4,990

 
45,070

 
4,089

 
4,990

 
49,159

 
54,149

 
(12,947
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
North Dover Center
Dover, DE
 

 
3,100

 
19,938

 
2,062

 
3,100

 
22,000

 
25,100

 
(6,571
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Brooksville Square
Brooksville, FL
 

 
4,140

 
12,095

 
2,119

 
4,140

 
14,214

 
18,354

 
(4,558
)
 
1987
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Coastal Way - Coastal Landing
Brooksville, FL
 
(26,831
)
 
8,840

 
33,020

 
4,181

 
8,840

 
37,201

 
46,041

 
(11,148
)
 
2008
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Midpoint Center
Cape Coral, FL
 

 
4,251

 
13,184

 
131

 
4,251

 
13,315

 
17,566

 
(2,611
)
 
2002
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Clearwater Mall
Clearwater, FL
 
(46,906
)
 
15,300

 
53,002

 
2,528

 
15,300

 
55,530

 
70,830

 
(12,494
)
 
1973
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Coconut Creek Plaza
Coconut Creek, FL
 
(10,190
)
 
7,400

 
24,799

 
3,858

 
7,400

 
28,657

 
36,057

 
(6,522
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Century Plaza Shopping Center
Deerfield Beach, FL
 

 
3,050

 
8,043

 
1,420

 
3,050

 
9,463

 
12,513

 
(2,647
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Northgate Shopping Center
DeLand, FL
 

 
3,500

 
10,902

 
1,128

 
3,500

 
12,030

 
15,530

 
(4,047
)
 
1993
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Sun Plaza
Ft. Walton Beach, FL
 

 
4,480

 
12,629

 
517

 
4,480

 
13,146

 
17,626

 
(4,681
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Normandy Square
Jacksonville, FL
 

 
1,930

 
5,384

 
698

 
1,930

 
6,082

 
8,012

 
(2,458
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Regency Park Shopping Center
Jacksonville, FL
 
(11,646
)
 
6,240

 
14,222

 
1,116

 
6,240

 
15,338

 
21,578

 
(4,614
)
 
1985
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
The Shoppes at Southside
Jacksonville, FL
 

 
6,720

 
18,597

 
125

 
6,720

 
18,722

 
25,442

 
(5,017
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Ventura Downs
Kissimmee, FL
 
(3,967
)
 
3,580

 
8,130

 
296

 
3,580

 
8,426

 
12,006

 
(2,660
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Marketplace at Wycliffe
Lake Worth, FL
 

 
7,930

 
13,500

 
1,612

 
7,930

 
15,112

 
23,042

 
(2,925
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Venetian Isle Shopping Ctr
Lighthouse Point, FL
 

 
8,270

 
14,805

 
1,553

 
8,270

 
16,358

 
24,628

 
(4,548
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Marco Town Center
Marco Island, FL
 

 
7,235

 
26,539

 
604

 
7,235

 
27,143

 
34,378

 
(4,533
)
 
1998
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Mall at 163rd Street
Miami, FL
 

 
9,450

 
34,892

 
2,955

 
9,450

 
37,847

 
47,297

 
(9,094
)
 
2007
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Miami Gardens
Miami, FL
 

 
8,876

 
17,567

 
608

 
8,876

 
18,175

 
27,051

 
(6,717
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Freedom Square
Naples, FL
 

 
4,735

 
15,116

 
1,004

 
4,735

 
16,120

 
20,855

 
(5,191
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Naples Plaza
Naples, FL
 

 
9,200

 
20,513

 
10,038

 
9,200

 
30,551

 
39,751

 
(7,641
)
 
2013
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Park Shore Plaza
Naples, FL
 

 
4,750

 
13,821

 
18,782

 
7,245

 
30,108

 
37,353

 
(4,956
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Chelsea Place
New Port Richey, FL
 

 
3,303

 
9,821

 
419

 
3,303

 
10,240

 
13,543

 
(2,456
)
 
1992
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Southgate Center
New Port Richey, FL
 

 
6,730

 
14,286

 
4,056

 
6,730

 
18,342

 
25,072

 
(5,503
)
 
1966
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Presidential Plaza West
North Lauderdale, FL
 

 
2,070

 
5,430

 
562

 
2,070

 
5,992

 
8,062

 
(1,437
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Fashion Square
Orange Park, FL
 

 
1,770

 
3,557

 
(1,679
)
 
1,770

 
1,878

 
3,648

 
(1,302
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Colonial Marketplace
Orlando, FL
 
(14,236
)
 
4,230

 
19,813

 
2,562

 
4,230

 
22,375

 
26,605

 
(5,674
)
 
1986
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Conway Crossing
Orlando, FL
 

 
3,163

 
12,181

 
782

 
3,163

 
12,963

 
16,126

 
(2,710
)
 
2002
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Hunter's Creek Plaza
Orlando, FL
 

 
3,589

 
5,891

 
894

 
3,589

 
6,785

 
10,374

 
(1,320
)
 
1998
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Pointe Orlando
Orlando, FL
 

 
6,120

 
55,051

 
24,283

 
6,120

 
79,334

 
85,454

 
(17,100
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Martin Downs Town Center
Palm City, FL
 

 
1,660

 
9,749

 
147

 
1,660

 
9,896

 
11,556

 
(1,609
)
 
1996
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Martin Downs Village Center
Palm City, FL
 

 
5,319

 
28,399

 
1,456

 
5,319

 
29,855

 
35,174

 
(5,367
)
 
1987
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
23rd Street Station
Panama City, FL
 
(5,092
)
 
3,120

 
9,016

 
1,017

 
3,120

 
10,033

 
13,153

 
(2,729
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Panama City Square
Panama City, FL
 

 
5,690

 
14,874

 
3,144

 
5,690

 
18,018

 
23,708

 
(4,760
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Pensacola Square
Pensacola, FL
 

 
2,630

 
9,716

 
1,624

 
2,630

 
11,340

 
13,970

 
(3,866
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
East Port Plaza
Port St. Lucie, FL
 

 
4,099

 
22,325

 
283

 
4,099

 
22,608

 
26,707

 
(4,529
)
 
1991
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Shoppes of Victoria Square
Port St. Lucie, FL
 

 
3,450

 
6,242

 
667

 
3,450

 
6,909

 
10,359

 
(2,231
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Lake St. Charles
Riverview, FL
 

 
2,801

 
6,909

 
67

 
2,801

 
6,976

 
9,777

 
(1,180
)
 
1999
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Cobblestone Village
Royal Palm Beach, FL
 

 
2,700

 
4,974

 
597

 
2,700

 
5,571

 
8,271

 
(1,142
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Beneva Village Shoppes
Sarasota, FL
 

 
3,489

 
17,369

 
1,648

 
3,489

 
19,017

 
22,506

 
(3,581
)
 
2018
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Sarasota Village
Sarasota, FL
 

 
5,190

 
12,476

 
3,598

 
5,190

 
16,074

 
21,264

 
(3,978
)
 
1972
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Atlantic Plaza
Satellite Beach, FL
 
(5,378
)
 
2,630

 
10,959

 
1,007

 
2,630

 
11,966

 
14,596

 
(3,001
)
 
2008
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Seminole Plaza
Seminole, FL
 
(4,243
)
 
3,870

 
7,934

 
2,083

 
3,870

 
10,017

 
13,887

 
(1,814
)
 
1964
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Cobblestone Village
St. Augustine, FL
 
(25,918
)
 
7,710

 
33,352

 
2,511

 
7,710

 
35,863

 
43,573

 
(9,177
)
 
2003
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Dolphin Village
St. Pete Beach, FL
 

 
9,882

 
15,835

 
848

 
9,882

 
16,683

 
26,565

 
(3,280
)
 
1990
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Bay Pointe Plaza
St. Petersburg, FL
 

 
4,025

 
11,745

 
7,939

 
4,025

 
19,684

 
23,709

 
(2,159
)
 
2016
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Rutland Plaza
St. Petersburg, FL
 
(6,682
)
 
3,880

 
8,143

 
982

 
3,880

 
9,125

 
13,005

 
(2,888
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Skyway Plaza
St. Petersburg, FL
 

 
2,200

 
7,178

 
84

 
2,200

 
7,262

 
9,462

 
(2,817
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Tyrone Gardens
St. Petersburg, FL
 

 
5,690

 
9,807

 
1,422

 
5,690

 
11,229

 
16,919

 
(3,704
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Downtown Publix
Stuart, FL
 
(10,684
)
 
1,770

 
12,630

 
986

 
1,770

 
13,616

 
15,386

 
(3,421
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Sunrise Town Center
Sunrise, FL
 

 
7,856

 
9,601

 
679

 
7,856

 
10,280

 
18,136

 
(3,605
)
 
1989
 
Oct-13
 
40 years

F-42



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subsequent to Acquisition
 
Gross Amount at Which Carried
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Life on Which Depreciated - Latest Income Statement
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
 
at the Close of the Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Encumbrances
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
Total
 
Accumulated Depreciation
 
Year Constructed(1)
 
Date Acquired
 
Carrollwood Center
Tampa, FL
 

 
3,749

 
14,818

 
851

 
3,749

 
15,669

 
19,418

 
(3,550
)
 
2002
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Ross Plaza
Tampa, FL
 

 
2,808

 
11,847

 
688

 
2,808

 
12,535

 
15,343

 
(2,586
)
 
1996
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Shoppes at Tarpon
Tarpon Springs, FL
 

 
7,800

 
13,765

 
3,792

 
7,800

 
17,557

 
25,357

 
(5,194
)
 
2003
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Venice Plaza
Venice, FL
 

 
3,245

 
14,504

 
359

 
3,245

 
14,863

 
18,108

 
(2,194
)
 
1999
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Venice Shopping Center
Venice, FL
 

 
2,555

 
6,847

 
461

 
2,555

 
7,308

 
9,863

 
(1,535
)
 
2000
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Venice Village Shoppes
Venice, FL
 

 
7,157

 
26,773

 
48

 
7,157

 
26,821

 
33,978

 
(283
)
 
1989
 
Nov-17
 
40 years
Governors Towne Square
Acworth, GA
 

 
2,605

 
14,037

 
126

 
2,605

 
14,163

 
16,768

 
(2,521
)
 
2005
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Albany Plaza
Albany, GA
 
(2,738
)
 
1,840

 
3,072

 
286

 
1,840

 
3,358

 
5,198

 
(1,055
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Mansell Crossing
Alpharetta, GA
 

 
19,840

 
33,230

 
5,764

 
19,840

 
38,994

 
58,834

 
(10,059
)
 
1993
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Perlis Plaza
Americus, GA
 

 
1,170

 
4,743

 
704

 
1,170

 
5,447

 
6,617

 
(2,071
)
 
1972
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Northeast Plaza
Atlanta, GA
 
(19,493
)
 
6,907

 
37,718

 
1,518

 
6,907

 
39,236

 
46,143

 
(9,901
)
 
1952
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Augusta West Plaza
Augusta, GA
 
(3,219
)
 
1,070

 
8,208

 
538

 
1,070

 
8,746

 
9,816

 
(4,094
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Sweetwater Village
Austell, GA
 

 
1,080

 
3,052

 
796

 
1,080

 
3,848

 
4,928

 
(1,344
)
 
1985
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Vineyards at Chateau Elan
Braselton, GA
 

 
2,202

 
14,512

 
461

 
2,202

 
14,973

 
17,175

 
(2,643
)
 
2002
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Cedar Plaza
Cedartown, GA
 

 
1,550

 
4,342

 
96

 
1,550

 
4,438

 
5,988

 
(1,650
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Conyers Plaza
Conyers, GA
 

 
3,870

 
11,741

 
1,645

 
3,870

 
13,386

 
17,256

 
(4,284
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Cordele Square
Cordele, GA
 

 
2,050

 
5,540

 
563

 
2,050

 
6,103

 
8,153

 
(2,466
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Covington Gallery
Covington, GA
 
(4,214
)
 
3,280

 
8,416

 
691

 
3,280

 
9,107

 
12,387

 
(2,906
)
 
1991
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Salem Road Station
Covington, GA
 

 
670

 
11,395

 
336

 
670

 
11,731

 
12,401

 
(2,441
)
 
2000
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Keith Bridge Commons
Cumming, GA
 

 
1,501

 
14,868

 
268

 
1,601

 
15,036

 
16,637

 
(3,451
)
 
2002
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Northside
Dalton, GA
 

 
1,320

 
3,950

 
836

 
1,320

 
4,786

 
6,106

 
(1,811
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Cosby Station
Douglasville, GA
 
(5,282
)
 
2,650

 
6,582

 
507

 
2,650

 
7,089

 
9,739

 
(2,012
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Park Plaza
Douglasville, GA
 

 
1,470

 
2,505

 
1,196

 
1,470

 
3,701

 
5,171

 
(685
)
 
1986
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Dublin Village
Dublin, GA
 

 
1,876

 
8,961

 
212

 
1,876

 
9,173

 
11,049

 
(2,388
)
 
2005
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Westgate
Dublin, GA
 

 
1,450

 
3,991

 
439

 
1,450

 
4,430

 
5,880

 
(1,497
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Venture Pointe
Duluth, GA
 

 
2,460

 
7,933

 
5,556

 
2,460

 
13,489

 
15,949

 
(4,480
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Banks Station
Fayetteville, GA
 
(4,423
)
 
3,490

 
12,254

 
1,441

 
3,490

 
13,695

 
17,185

 
(5,066
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Barrett Place
Kennesaw, GA
 

 
6,990

 
13,953

 
1,373

 
6,990

 
15,326

 
22,316

 
(5,230
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Shops of Huntcrest
Lawrenceville, GA
 

 
2,093

 
17,790

 
555

 
2,093

 
18,345

 
20,438

 
(3,044
)
 
2003
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Mableton Walk
Mableton, GA
 

 
1,645

 
9,384

 
974

 
1,645

 
10,358

 
12,003

 
(2,651
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
The Village at Mableton
Mableton, GA
 

 
2,040

 
6,443

 
2,387

 
2,040

 
8,830

 
10,870

 
(3,117
)
 
1959
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Marshalls at Eastlake
Marietta, GA
 

 
2,650

 
2,667

 
1,002

 
2,650

 
3,669

 
6,319

 
(1,038
)
 
1982
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
New Chastain Corners
Marietta, GA
 

 
3,090

 
8,071

 
975

 
3,090

 
9,046

 
12,136

 
(2,759
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Pavilions at Eastlake
Marietta, GA
 

 
4,770

 
12,085

 
1,919

 
4,770

 
14,004

 
18,774

 
(4,950
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Creekwood Village
Rex, GA
 

 
1,400

 
4,752

 
327

 
1,400

 
5,079

 
6,479

 
(1,770
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Shops of Riverdale
Riverdale, GA
 

 
640

 
2,109

 
209

 
640

 
2,318

 
2,958

 
(518
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Holcomb Bridge Crossing
Roswell, GA
 

 
1,170

 
5,418

 
596

 
1,170

 
6,014

 
7,184

 
(2,738
)
 
1988
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Victory Square
Savannah, GA
 

 
6,080

 
14,651

 
344

 
6,080

 
14,995

 
21,075

 
(3,677
)
 
2007
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Stockbridge Village
Stockbridge, GA
 

 
6,210

 
16,418

 
3,525

 
6,210

 
19,943

 
26,153

 
(6,314
)
 
2008
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Stone Mountain Festival
Stone Mountain, GA
 
(7,755
)
 
5,740

 
16,730

 
1,538

 
5,740

 
18,268

 
24,008

 
(6,796
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Wilmington Island
Wilmington Island, GA
 

 
2,630

 
7,894

 
1,089

 
2,630

 
8,983

 
11,613

 
(1,957
)
 
1985
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Kimberly West Shopping Center
Davenport, IA
 

 
1,710

 
6,329

 
604

 
1,710

 
6,933

 
8,643

 
(2,447
)
 
1987
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Haymarket Mall
Des Moines, IA
 
(3,846
)
 
2,320

 
9,604

 
523

 
2,320

 
10,127

 
12,447

 
(3,890
)
 
1979
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Haymarket Square
Des Moines, IA
 
(6,481
)
 
3,360

 
9,192

 
4,327

 
3,360

 
13,519

 
16,879

 
(3,613
)
 
1979
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Warren Plaza
Dubuque, IA
 

 
1,740

 
6,155

 
387

 
1,740

 
6,542

 
8,282

 
(1,257
)
 
1993
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Annex of Arlington
Arlington Heights, IL
 

 
3,769

 
15,006

 
10,929

 
4,373

 
25,331

 
29,704

 
(5,602
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Ridge Plaza
Arlington Heights, IL
 

 
3,720

 
10,168

 
4,741

 
3,720

 
14,909

 
18,629

 
(5,523
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Bartonville Square
Bartonville, IL
 

 
480

 
3,580

 
149

 
480

 
3,729

 
4,209

 
(1,417
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Festival Center
Bradley, IL
 
(658
)
 
390

 
2,211

 
37

 
390

 
2,248

 
2,638

 
(798
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Southfield Plaza
Bridgeview, IL
 
(13,350
)
 
5,880

 
18,251

 
1,550

 
5,880

 
19,801

 
25,681

 
(7,009
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Commons of Chicago Ridge
Chicago Ridge, IL
 

 
4,310

 
39,027

 
4,892

 
4,310

 
43,919

 
48,229

 
(12,315
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Rivercrest Shopping Center
Crestwood, IL
 

 
7,010

 
39,886

 
15,608

 
11,010

 
51,494

 
62,504

 
(14,164
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
The Commons of Crystal Lake
Crystal Lake, IL
 

 
3,660

 
31,770

 
3,889

 
3,660

 
35,659

 
39,319

 
(8,804
)
 
1987
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Elk Grove Town Center
Elk Grove Village, IL
 

 
3,730

 
19,113

 
970

 
3,730

 
20,083

 
23,813

 
(5,710
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Crossroads Centre
Fairview Heights, IL
 

 
3,230

 
8,928

 
6,379

 
3,230

 
15,307

 
18,537

 
(4,660
)
 
1975
 
Jun-11
 
40 years

F-43



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subsequent to Acquisition
 
Gross Amount at Which Carried
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Life on Which Depreciated - Latest Income Statement
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
 
at the Close of the Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Encumbrances
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
Total
 
Accumulated Depreciation
 
Year Constructed(1)
 
Date Acquired
 
Freeport Plaza
Freeport, IL
 

 
660

 
5,614

 
80

 
660

 
5,694

 
6,354

 
(2,675
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Westview Center
Hanover Park, IL
 

 
6,130

 
27,797

 
6,222

 
6,130

 
34,019

 
40,149

 
(8,047
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
The Quentin Collection
Kildeer, IL
 
(20,743
)
 
5,780

 
26,232

 
1,610

 
5,780

 
27,842

 
33,622

 
(7,083
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Butterfield Square
Libertyville, IL
 

 
3,430

 
13,306

 
2,796

 
3,430

 
16,102

 
19,532

 
(4,205
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
High Point Centre
Lombard, IL
 

 
7,510

 
19,134

 
1,887

 
7,510

 
21,021

 
28,531

 
(4,672
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Long Meadow Commons
Mundelein, IL
 

 
4,700

 
11,447

 
1,703

 
4,700

 
13,150

 
17,850

 
(4,917
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Westridge Court
Naperville, IL
 

 
10,560

 
66,986

 
12,870

 
10,560

 
79,856

 
90,416

 
(17,702
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Sterling Bazaar
Peoria, IL
 

 
2,050

 
6,581

 
469

 
2,050

 
7,050

 
9,100

 
(2,754
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Rollins Crossing
Round Lake Beach, IL
 

 
3,040

 
23,180

 
1,317

 
3,040

 
24,497

 
27,537

 
(7,361
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Twin Oaks Shopping Center
Silvis, IL
 

 
1,300

 
6,896

 
141

 
1,300

 
7,037

 
8,337

 
(2,113
)
 
1991
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Sangamon Center North
Springfield, IL
 

 
2,350

 
9,420

 
851

 
2,350

 
10,271

 
12,621

 
(3,873
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Tinley Park Plaza
Tinley Park, IL
 
(17,869
)
 
12,250

 
20,639

 
4,669

 
12,250

 
25,308

 
37,558

 
(5,539
)
 
1973
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Meridian Village
Carmel, IN
 

 
2,089

 
7,231

 
2,215

 
2,089

 
9,446

 
11,535

 
(2,684
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Columbus Center
Columbus, IN
 
(9,372
)
 
1,480

 
13,913

 
2,598

 
1,480

 
16,511

 
17,991

 
(4,180
)
 
1964
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Elkhart Plaza West
Elkhart, IN
 

 
770

 
6,326

 
232

 
770

 
6,558

 
7,328

 
(2,050
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Apple Glen Crossing
Fort Wayne, IN
 

 
2,550

 
19,742

 
752

 
2,550

 
20,494

 
23,044

 
(5,481
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Market Centre
Goshen, IN
 

 
1,765

 
14,231

 
4,032

 
1,765

 
18,263

 
20,028

 
(5,276
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Marwood Plaza
Indianapolis, IN
 

 
1,720

 
5,479

 
960

 
1,720

 
6,439

 
8,159

 
(1,664
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Westlane Shopping Center
Indianapolis, IN
 

 
870

 
2,603

 
1,048

 
870

 
3,651

 
4,521

 
(1,170
)
 
1968
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Valley View Plaza
Marion, IN
 
(1,053
)
 
440

 
3,020

 
162

 
440

 
3,182

 
3,622

 
(853
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Bittersweet Plaza
Mishawaka, IN
 

 
840

 
6,677

 
527

 
840

 
7,204

 
8,044

 
(1,969
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Lincoln Plaza
New Haven, IN
 

 
780

 
6,277

 
809

 
780

 
7,086

 
7,866

 
(1,948
)
 
1968
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Speedway Super Center
Speedway, IN
 

 
8,410

 
48,942

 
6,937

 
8,410

 
55,879

 
64,289

 
(13,474
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Sagamore Park Centre
West Lafayette, IN
 

 
2,390

 
10,865

 
1,874

 
2,390

 
12,739

 
15,129

 
(3,959
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Westchester Square
Lenexa, KS
 

 
3,250

 
13,982

 
2,439

 
3,250

 
16,421

 
19,671

 
(4,345
)
 
1987
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
West Loop Shopping Center
Manhattan, KS
 

 
2,800

 
10,299

 
6,263

 
2,800

 
16,562

 
19,362

 
(4,303
)
 
2013
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
North Dixie Plaza
Elizabethtown, KY
 

 
2,370

 
4,521

 
454

 
2,370

 
4,975

 
7,345

 
(1,029
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Florence Plaza - Florence Square
Florence, KY
 

 
9,380

 
46,030

 
18,620

 
11,013

 
63,017

 
74,030

 
(14,987
)
 
2014
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Jeffersontown Commons
Jeffersontown, KY
 

 
3,920

 
14,437

 
952

 
3,920

 
15,389

 
19,309

 
(5,459
)
 
1959
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Mist Lake Plaza
Lexington, KY
 

 
4,200

 
10,452

 
979

 
4,200

 
11,431

 
15,631

 
(3,488
)
 
1993
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
London Marketplace
London, KY
 

 
1,400

 
10,293

 
334

 
1,400

 
10,627

 
12,027

 
(3,930
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Eastgate Shopping Center
Louisville, KY
 

 
4,300

 
13,515

 
2,316

 
4,300

 
15,831

 
20,131

 
(5,244
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Plainview Village
Louisville, KY
 

 
2,600

 
9,709

 
1,301

 
2,600

 
11,010

 
13,610

 
(3,004
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Stony Brook I & II
Louisville, KY
 

 
3,650

 
17,554

 
1,653

 
3,650

 
19,207

 
22,857

 
(5,124
)
 
1988
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Towne Square North
Owensboro, KY
 
(4,210
)
 
2,230

 
9,037

 
444

 
2,230

 
9,481

 
11,711

 
(3,681
)
 
1988
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Karam Shopping Center
Lafayette, LA
 
(1,944
)
 
410

 
2,955

 
446

 
410

 
3,401

 
3,811

 
(1,315
)
 
1970
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Iberia Plaza
New Iberia, LA
 

 
2,590

 
5,728

 
1,281

 
2,590

 
7,009

 
9,599

 
(3,075
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Lagniappe Village
New Iberia, LA
 

 
3,170

 
11,023

 
1,097

 
3,170

 
12,120

 
15,290

 
(5,502
)
 
2010
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
The Pines Shopping Center
Pineville, LA
 
(3,438
)
 
3,080

 
7,035

 
133

 
3,080

 
7,168

 
10,248

 
(1,609
)
 
1991
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Points West Plaza
Brockton, MA
 
(7,397
)
 
2,200

 
10,492

 
1,226

 
2,200

 
11,718

 
13,918

 
(4,105
)
 
1960
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Burlington Square I, II & III
Burlington, MA
 

 
4,690

 
12,717

 
1,832

 
4,690

 
14,549

 
19,239

 
(3,679
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Chicopee Marketplace
Chicopee, MA
 

 
3,470

 
24,980

 
1,293

 
3,470

 
26,273

 
29,743

 
(6,469
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Holyoke Shopping Center
Holyoke, MA
 

 
3,110

 
11,903

 
817

 
3,110

 
12,720

 
15,830

 
(4,135
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
WaterTower Plaza
Leominster, MA
 

 
10,400

 
39,499

 
2,534

 
10,400

 
42,033

 
52,433

 
(12,442
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Lunenberg Crossing
Lunenburg, MA
 
(2,041
)
 
930

 
1,668

 
901

 
930

 
2,569

 
3,499

 
(392
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Lynn Marketplace
Lynn, MA
 

 
3,100

 
5,615

 
2,178

 
3,100

 
7,793

 
10,893

 
(1,964
)
 
1968
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Webster Square Shopping Center
Marshfield, MA
 

 
5,532

 
27,223

 
203

 
5,532

 
27,426

 
32,958

 
(3,288
)
 
2005
 
Jun-15
 
40 years
Berkshire Crossing
Pittsfield, MA
 

 
5,210

 
38,733

 
2,551

 
5,210

 
41,284

 
46,494

 
(12,164
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Westgate Plaza
Westfield, MA
 

 
2,250

 
9,669

 
970

 
2,250

 
10,639

 
12,889

 
(3,515
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Perkins Farm Marketplace
Worcester, MA
 

 
2,150

 
16,766

 
2,632

 
2,150

 
19,398

 
21,548

 
(6,027
)
 
1967
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
South Plaza Shopping Center
California, MD
 

 
2,174

 
23,209

 
109

 
2,174

 
23,318

 
25,492

 
(4,005
)
 
2005
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Campus Village Shoppes
College Park, MD
 

 
1,660

 
4,980

 
647

 
1,660

 
5,627

 
7,287

 
(1,226
)
 
1986
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Fox Run
Prince Frederick, MD
 

 
3,560

 
31,086

 
2,430

 
3,560

 
33,516

 
37,076

 
(9,803
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Liberty Plaza
Randallstown, MD
 

 
782

 
6,134

 
2,306

 
782

 
8,440

 
9,222

 
(1,936
)
 
1962
 
Jun-11
 
40 years

F-44



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subsequent to Acquisition
 
Gross Amount at Which Carried
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Life on Which Depreciated - Latest Income Statement
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
 
at the Close of the Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Encumbrances
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
Total
 
Accumulated Depreciation
 
Year Constructed(1)
 
Date Acquired
 
Pine Tree Shopping Center
Portland, ME
 

 
2,860

 
18,988

 
1,494

 
2,860

 
20,482

 
23,342

 
(7,590
)
 
1958
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Arborland Center
Ann Arbor, MI
 

 
14,184

 
90,938

 
283

 
14,184

 
91,221

 
105,405

 
(4,850
)
 
2000
 
Mar-17
 
40 years
Maple Village
Ann Arbor, MI
 

 
3,200

 
15,895

 
19,199

 
3,200

 
35,094

 
38,294

 
(4,690
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Grand Crossing
Brighton, MI
 
(2,692
)
 
1,780

 
7,487

 
2,059

 
1,780

 
9,546

 
11,326

 
(2,954
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Farmington Crossroads
Farmington, MI
 

 
1,620

 
4,340

 
1,939

 
1,620

 
6,279

 
7,899

 
(1,855
)
 
1986
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Silver Pointe Shopping Center
Fenton, MI
 
(2,590
)
 
3,840

 
12,258

 
1,298

 
3,840

 
13,556

 
17,396

 
(4,822
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Cascade East
Grand Rapids, MI
 

 
1,280

 
4,802

 
1,317

 
1,280

 
6,119

 
7,399

 
(2,277
)
 
1983
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Delta Center
Lansing, MI
 
(5,185
)
 
1,580

 
9,394

 
1,853

 
1,580

 
11,247

 
12,827

 
(4,425
)
 
1985
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Lakes Crossing
Muskegon, MI
 

 
1,440

 
13,457

 
2,277

 
1,440

 
15,734

 
17,174

 
(4,509
)
 
2008
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Redford Plaza
Redford, MI
 

 
7,510

 
18,348

 
3,178

 
7,510

 
21,526

 
29,036

 
(7,410
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Hampton Village Centre
Rochester Hills, MI
 

 
5,370

 
47,612

 
10,002

 
5,370

 
57,614

 
62,984

 
(16,418
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Fashion Corners
Saginaw, MI
 

 
1,940

 
17,703

 
644

 
1,940

 
18,347

 
20,287

 
(5,700
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Green Acres
Saginaw, MI
 

 
2,170

 
8,225

 
4,402

 
2,170

 
12,627

 
14,797

 
(4,120
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Southfield Plaza
Southfield, MI
 

 
1,320

 
3,608

 
2,166

 
1,320

 
5,774

 
7,094

 
(1,867
)
 
1970
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
18 Ryan
Sterling Heights, MI
 
(5,503
)
 
3,160

 
8,794

 
366

 
3,160

 
9,160

 
12,320

 
(2,143
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Delco Plaza
Sterling Heights, MI
 
(3,624
)
 
2,860

 
6,682

 
1,263

 
2,860

 
7,945

 
10,805

 
(3,524
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Grand Traverse Crossing
Traverse City, MI
 

 
3,100

 
31,047

 
1,947

 
3,100

 
32,994

 
36,094

 
(8,550
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
West Ridge
Westland, MI
 

 
1,800

 
5,244

 
4,571

 
1,800

 
9,815

 
11,615

 
(2,209
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Roundtree Place
Ypsilanti, MI
 

 
3,520

 
8,249

 
6,603

 
3,520

 
14,852

 
18,372

 
(3,262
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Washtenaw Fountain Plaza
Ypsilanti, MI
 

 
2,030

 
6,890

 
701

 
2,030

 
7,591

 
9,621

 
(2,997
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Southport Centre I - VI
Apple Valley, MN
 

 
4,602

 
18,375

 
505

 
4,602

 
18,880

 
23,482

 
(4,375
)
 
1985
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Burning Tree Plaza
Duluth, MN
 

 
4,790

 
15,761

 
616

 
4,790

 
16,377

 
21,167

 
(4,693
)
 
1987
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Elk Park Center
Elk River, MN
 

 
3,770

 
18,255

 
1,027

 
3,770

 
19,282

 
23,052

 
(6,144
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Westwind Plaza
Minnetonka, MN
 

 
2,630

 
11,452

 
904

 
2,630

 
12,356

 
14,986

 
(2,976
)
 
2007
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Richfield Hub
Richfield, MN
 

 
7,748

 
18,517

 
1,591

 
7,748

 
20,108

 
27,856

 
(4,552
)
 
1952
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Roseville Center
Roseville , MN
 

 
1,620

 
8,364

 
145

 
1,620

 
8,509

 
10,129

 
(2,189
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Marketplace @ 42
Savage, MN
 

 
5,150

 
11,489

 
4,807

 
5,150

 
16,296

 
21,446

 
(2,823
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Sun Ray Shopping Center
St. Paul, MN
 

 
5,250

 
20,617

 
2,692

 
5,250

 
23,309

 
28,559

 
(6,827
)
 
1958
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
White Bear Hills Shopping Center
White Bear Lake, MN
 

 
1,790

 
6,157

 
252

 
1,790

 
6,409

 
8,199

 
(2,621
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Ellisville Square
Ellisville, MO
 

 
2,130

 
2,907

 
9,368

 
2,130

 
12,275

 
14,405

 
(2,029
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Clocktower Place
Florissant, MO
 

 
3,590

 
8,395

 
2,730

 
3,590

 
11,125

 
14,715

 
(3,350
)
 
1987
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Hub Shopping Center
Independence, MO
 

 
850

 
7,600

 
345

 
850

 
7,945

 
8,795

 
(3,331
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Watts Mill Plaza
Kansas City, MO
 

 
2,610

 
13,282

 
1,291

 
2,610

 
14,573

 
17,183

 
(3,726
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Liberty Corners
Liberty, MO
 

 
2,530

 
8,567

 
2,242

 
2,530

 
10,809

 
13,339

 
(3,790
)
 
1987
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Maplewood Square
Maplewood, MO
 

 
1,450

 
4,494

 
425

 
1,450

 
4,919

 
6,369

 
(1,764
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Clinton Crossing
Clinton, MS
 
(4,048
)
 
2,760

 
9,216

 
706

 
2,760

 
9,922

 
12,682

 
(2,778
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
County Line Plaza
Jackson, MS
 

 
2,820

 
23,157

 
6,607

 
2,820

 
29,764

 
32,584

 
(6,249
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Devonshire Place
Cary, NC
 
(4,671
)
 
940

 
3,674

 
5,526

 
940

 
9,200

 
10,140

 
(2,241
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
McMullen Creek Market
Charlotte, NC
 

 
10,590

 
22,874

 
4,406

 
10,590

 
27,280

 
37,870

 
(6,573
)
 
1988
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
The Commons at Chancellor Park
Charlotte, NC
 

 
5,240

 
19,587

 
2,262

 
5,240

 
21,849

 
27,089

 
(6,140
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Macon Plaza
Franklin, NC
 

 
770

 
3,783

 
195

 
770

 
3,978

 
4,748

 
(1,687
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Garner Towne Square
Garner, NC
 

 
6,233

 
23,097

 
1,523

 
6,233

 
24,620

 
30,853

 
(5,223
)
 
1997
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Franklin Square
Gastonia, NC
 

 
7,060

 
27,871

 
2,746

 
7,060

 
30,617

 
37,677

 
(7,774
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Wendover Place
Greensboro, NC
 

 
15,990

 
39,032

 
2,865

 
15,990

 
41,897

 
57,887

 
(14,127
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
University Commons
Greenville, NC
 

 
5,350

 
26,023

 
3,976

 
5,350

 
29,999

 
35,349

 
(8,157
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Valley Crossing
Hickory, NC
 

 
2,130

 
5,884

 
8,826

 
2,130

 
14,710

 
16,840

 
(3,987
)
 
2014
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Kinston Pointe
Kinston, NC
 

 
2,180

 
8,479

 
337

 
2,180

 
8,816

 
10,996

 
(3,886
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Magnolia Plaza
Morganton, NC
 

 
730

 
3,059

 
211

 
730

 
3,270

 
4,000

 
(599
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Roxboro Square
Roxboro, NC
 

 
1,550

 
8,935

 
305

 
1,550

 
9,240

 
10,790

 
(3,273
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Innes Street Market
Salisbury, NC
 

 
12,180

 
27,275

 
766

 
12,180

 
28,041

 
40,221

 
(11,037
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Crossroads
Statesville, NC
 

 
6,220

 
15,098

 
1,320

 
6,220

 
16,418

 
22,638

 
(4,488
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Anson Station
Wadesboro, NC
 
(1,229
)
 
910

 
3,895

 
267

 
910

 
4,162

 
5,072

 
(1,876
)
 
1988
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
New Centre Market
Wilmington, NC
 

 
5,730

 
14,673

 
2,595

 
5,730

 
17,268

 
22,998

 
(3,507
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
University Commons
Wilmington, NC
 

 
6,910

 
26,445

 
1,946

 
6,910

 
28,391

 
35,301

 
(7,992
)
 
2007
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Whitaker Square
Winston Salem, NC
 

 
2,923

 
11,824

 
887

 
2,923

 
12,711

 
15,634

 
(2,432
)
 
1996
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Parkway Plaza
Winston-Salem, NC
 

 
6,910

 
17,009

 
1,414

 
6,910

 
18,423

 
25,333

 
(5,950
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Stratford Commons
Winston-Salem, NC
 

 
2,770

 
9,402

 
268

 
2,770

 
9,670

 
12,440

 
(2,873
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years

F-45



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subsequent to Acquisition
 
Gross Amount at Which Carried
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Life on Which Depreciated - Latest Income Statement
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
 
at the Close of the Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Encumbrances
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
Total
 
Accumulated Depreciation
 
Year Constructed(1)
 
Date Acquired
 
Bedford Grove
Bedford, NH
 

 
3,400

 
17,627

 
3,650

 
3,400

 
21,277

 
24,677

 
(6,132
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Capitol Shopping Center
Concord, NH
 

 
2,160

 
11,361

 
1,290

 
2,160

 
12,651

 
14,811

 
(4,655
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Willow Springs Plaza
Nashua , NH
 
(13,739
)
 
3,490

 
19,290

 
1,195

 
3,490

 
20,485

 
23,975

 
(5,384
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Seacoast Shopping Center
Seabrook , NH
 
(4,634
)
 
2,230

 
7,956

 
819

 
2,230

 
8,775

 
11,005

 
(1,459
)
 
1991
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Tri-City Plaza
Somersworth, NH
 

 
1,900

 
9,682

 
4,985

 
1,900

 
14,667

 
16,567

 
(4,138
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Laurel Square
Brick, NJ
 
(9,072
)
 
5,400

 
19,256

 
1,454

 
5,400

 
20,710

 
26,110

 
(5,113
)
 
2003
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
the Shoppes at Cinnaminson
Cinnaminson, NJ
 

 
6,030

 
45,126

 
3,639

 
6,030

 
48,765

 
54,795

 
(11,746
)
 
2010
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Acme Clark
Clark, NJ
 
(4,155
)
 
2,630

 
8,351

 
28

 
2,630

 
8,379

 
11,009

 
(2,391
)
 
2007
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Collegetown Shopping Center
Glassboro, NJ
 

 
1,560

 
15,512

 
7,856

 
1,560

 
23,368

 
24,928

 
(7,250
)
 
1966
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Hamilton Plaza
Hamilton, NJ
 
(2,555
)
 
1,580

 
8,573

 
3,459

 
1,580

 
12,032

 
13,612

 
(2,749
)
 
1972
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Bennetts Mills Plaza
Jackson, NJ
 
(12,144
)
 
3,130

 
16,922

 
509

 
3,130

 
17,431

 
20,561

 
(4,237
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Lakewood Plaza
Lakewood, NJ
 

 
5,090

 
25,781

 
842

 
5,090

 
26,623

 
31,713

 
(7,650
)
 
1966
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Marlton Crossing
Marlton, NJ
 

 
5,950

 
45,186

 
11,103

 
5,950

 
56,289

 
62,239

 
(15,394
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Middletown Plaza
Middletown, NJ
 
(16,534
)
 
5,060

 
40,870

 
2,482

 
5,060

 
43,352

 
48,412

 
(10,034
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Larchmont Centre
Mount Laurel, NJ
 
(7,000
)
 
4,421

 
14,787

 
133

 
4,421

 
14,920

 
19,341

 
(1,872
)
 
1985
 
Jun-15
 
40 years
Old Bridge Gateway
Old Bridge, NJ
 

 
7,200

 
36,889

 
3,931

 
7,200

 
40,820

 
48,020

 
(10,422
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Morris Hills Shopping Center
Parsippany, NJ
 

 
3,970

 
28,892

 
5,401

 
3,970

 
34,293

 
38,263

 
(7,393
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Rio Grande Plaza
Rio Grande, NJ
 

 
1,660

 
11,840

 
1,071

 
1,660

 
12,911

 
14,571

 
(3,407
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Ocean Heights Plaza
Somers Point, NJ
 

 
6,110

 
34,462

 
1,868

 
6,110

 
36,330

 
42,440

 
(7,575
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Springfield Place
Springfield, NJ
 

 
1,150

 
4,310

 
2,070

 
1,773

 
5,757

 
7,530

 
(1,257
)
 
1965
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Tinton Falls Plaza
Tinton Falls, NJ
 

 
3,080

 
11,550

 
548

 
3,080

 
12,098

 
15,178

 
(3,303
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Cross Keys Commons
Turnersville, NJ
 

 
5,840

 
32,004

 
4,681

 
5,840

 
36,685

 
42,525

 
(8,588
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Dover Park Plaza
Yardville, NJ
 

 
1,030

 
7,280

 
733

 
1,030

 
8,013

 
9,043

 
(1,803
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
St Francis Plaza
Santa Fe, NM
 

 
1,110

 
4,843

 

 
1,110

 
4,843

 
5,953

 
(1,171
)
 
1993
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Smith's
Socorro, NM
 
(1,331
)
 
600

 
5,312

 
(2,061
)
 
600

 
3,251

 
3,851

 
(2,074
)
 
1976
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Parkway Plaza
Carle Place, NY
 

 
5,790

 
19,234

 
2,615

 
5,790

 
21,849

 
27,639

 
(4,498
)
 
1993
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Erie Canal Centre
Dewitt, NY
 
(2,283
)
 
1,080

 
3,957

 
14,940

 
1,080

 
18,897

 
19,977

 
(1,759
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Unity Plaza
East Fishkill, NY
 
(5,414
)
 
2,100

 
13,935

 
134

 
2,100

 
14,069

 
16,169

 
(3,067
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Suffolk Plaza
East Setauket, NY
 

 
2,780

 
9,937

 
758

 
2,780

 
10,695

 
13,475

 
(2,032
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Three Village Shopping Center
East Setauket, NY
 

 
5,310

 
15,704

 
322

 
5,310

 
16,026

 
21,336

 
(3,744
)
 
1991
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Stewart Plaza
Garden City, NY
 

 
6,040

 
20,987

 
1,478

 
6,040

 
22,465

 
28,505

 
(6,460
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Dalewood I, II & III Shopping Center
Hartsdale, NY
 

 
6,900

 
56,902

 
2,874

 
6,900

 
59,776

 
66,676

 
(11,454
)
 
1972
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Cayuga Mall
Ithaca, NY
 
(6,873
)
 
1,180

 
9,104

 
3,652

 
1,180

 
12,756

 
13,936

 
(3,570
)
 
1969
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Kings Park Plaza
Kings Park, NY
 

 
4,790

 
11,100

 
2,128

 
4,790

 
13,228

 
18,018

 
(3,021
)
 
1985
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Village Square Shopping Center
Larchmont, NY
 

 
1,320

 
4,808

 
883

 
1,320

 
5,691

 
7,011

 
(1,025
)
 
1981
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Falcaro's Plaza
Lawrence, NY
 

 
3,410

 
8,822

 
1,829

 
3,410

 
10,651

 
14,061

 
(1,927
)
 
1972
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Mamaroneck Centre
Mamaroneck, NY
 

 
1,460

 
765

 
4,203

 
2,198

 
4,230

 
6,428

 
(210
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Sunshine Square
Medford, NY
 

 
7,350

 
23,359

 
1,906

 
7,350

 
25,265

 
32,615

 
(6,130
)
 
2007
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Wallkill Plaza
Middletown, NY
 

 
1,360

 
7,814

 
3,027

 
1,360

 
10,841

 
12,201

 
(4,114
)
 
1986
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Monroe Plaza
Monroe, NY
 
(8,054
)
 
1,840

 
16,111

 
573

 
1,840

 
16,684

 
18,524

 
(5,094
)
 
1985
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Rockland Plaza
Nanuet, NY
 
(28,385
)
 
10,700

 
59,163

 
9,021

 
11,097

 
67,787

 
78,884

 
(13,438
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
North Ridge Shopping Center
New Rochelle, NY
 

 
4,910

 
9,253

 
966

 
4,910

 
10,219

 
15,129

 
(2,080
)
 
1971
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Nesconset Shopping Center
Port Jefferson Station, NY
 

 
5,510

 
20,215

 
3,122

 
5,510

 
23,337

 
28,847

 
(5,775
)
 
1961
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Roanoke Plaza
Riverhead, NY
 

 
5,050

 
15,110

 
1,436

 
5,050

 
16,546

 
21,596

 
(4,419
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Rockville Centre
Rockville Centre, NY
 

 
3,590

 
6,935

 
140

 
3,590

 
7,075

 
10,665

 
(1,766
)
 
1975
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Mohawk Acres Plaza
Rome, NY
 
(4,574
)
 
1,720

 
13,408

 
1,024

 
1,720

 
14,432

 
16,152

 
(4,200
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
College Plaza
Selden, NY
 

 
6,330

 
11,494

 
15,608

 
6,865

 
26,567

 
33,432

 
(6,457
)
 
2013
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Campus Plaza
Vestal, NY
 

 
1,170

 
16,075

 
633

 
1,170

 
16,708

 
17,878

 
(5,551
)
 
2003
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Parkway Plaza
Vestal, NY
 

 
2,168

 
18,651

 
1,577

 
2,168

 
20,228

 
22,396

 
(7,267
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Shoppes at Vestal
Vestal, NY
 

 
1,340

 
14,730

 
72

 
1,340

 
14,802

 
16,142

 
(2,942
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Town Square Mall
Vestal, NY
 

 
2,520

 
40,790

 
5,198

 
2,520

 
45,988

 
48,508

 
(12,003
)
 
1991
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
The Plaza at Salmon Run
Watertown, NY
 

 
1,420

 
12,243

 
(3,102
)
 
1,420

 
9,141

 
10,561

 
(3,112
)
 
1993
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Highridge Plaza
Yonkers, NY
 

 
6,020

 
16,388

 
2,562

 
6,020

 
18,950

 
24,970

 
(3,695
)
 
1977
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Brunswick Town Center
Brunswick, OH
 
(10,459
)
 
2,930

 
18,531

 
656

 
2,930

 
19,187

 
22,117

 
(4,184
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years

F-46



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subsequent to Acquisition
 
Gross Amount at Which Carried
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Life on Which Depreciated - Latest Income Statement
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
 
at the Close of the Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Encumbrances
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
Total
 
Accumulated Depreciation
 
Year Constructed(1)
 
Date Acquired
 
30th Street Plaza
Canton, OH
 

 
1,950

 
14,383

 
676

 
1,950

 
15,059

 
17,009

 
(4,704
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Brentwood Plaza
Cincinnati, OH
 

 
5,090

 
19,703

 
2,336

 
5,090

 
22,039

 
27,129

 
(5,831
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Delhi Shopping Center
Cincinnati, OH
 

 
3,690

 
7,897

 
1,804

 
3,690

 
9,701

 
13,391

 
(2,986
)
 
1973
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Harpers Station
Cincinnati, OH
 

 
3,110

 
25,054

 
6,739

 
3,987

 
30,916

 
34,903

 
(7,683
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Western Hills Plaza
Cincinnati, OH
 

 
8,690

 
27,598

 
655

 
8,690

 
28,253

 
36,943

 
(9,106
)
 
1954
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Western Village
Cincinnati, OH
 

 
3,370

 
12,423

 
602

 
3,420

 
12,975

 
16,395

 
(3,598
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Crown Point
Columbus, OH
 

 
2,120

 
14,518

 
1,579

 
2,120

 
16,097

 
18,217

 
(4,648
)
 
1980
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Greentree Shopping Center
Columbus, OH
 
(4,858
)
 
1,920

 
12,024

 
277

 
1,920

 
12,301

 
14,221

 
(3,983
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Brandt Pike Place
Dayton, OH
 

 
616

 
1,694

 
16

 
616

 
1,710

 
2,326

 
(621
)
 
2008
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
South Towne Centre
Dayton, OH
 
(14,573
)
 
4,990

 
42,539

 
6,534

 
4,990

 
49,073

 
54,063

 
(13,966
)
 
1972
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Southland Shopping Center
Middleburg Heights, OH
 
(34,996
)
 
5,940

 
54,258

 
7,598

 
5,940

 
61,856

 
67,796

 
(18,190
)
 
1951
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
The Shoppes at North Olmsted
North Olmsted, OH
 

 
510

 
3,987

 
16

 
510

 
4,003

 
4,513

 
(1,193
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Surrey Square
Norwood, OH
 
(5,062
)
 
3,900

 
17,865

 
1,784

 
3,900

 
19,649

 
23,549

 
(5,893
)
 
2010
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Market Place
Piqua, OH
 

 
390

 
3,993

 
1,257

 
390

 
5,250

 
5,640

 
(2,096
)
 
1972
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Brice Park
Reynoldsburg, OH
 

 
2,820

 
12,075

 
1,227

 
2,820

 
13,302

 
16,122

 
(3,711
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Streetsboro Crossing
Streetsboro, OH
 

 
640

 
5,716

 
728

 
640

 
6,444

 
7,084

 
(2,129
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Miracle Mile Shopping Plaza
Toledo, OH
 
(4,291
)
 
1,510

 
15,374

 
2,153

 
1,510

 
17,527

 
19,037

 
(5,791
)
 
1955
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Southland Shopping Plaza
Toledo, OH
 

 
2,440

 
10,390

 
1,972

 
2,440

 
12,362

 
14,802

 
(3,909
)
 
1988
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Wadsworth Crossings
Wadsworth, OH
 

 
7,004

 
13,375

 
2,085

 
7,004

 
15,460

 
22,464

 
(3,656
)
 
2005
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Northgate Plaza
Westerville, OH
 

 
300

 
1,204

 
340

 
300

 
1,544

 
1,844

 
(519
)
 
2008
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Marketplace
Tulsa, OK
 

 
5,040

 
12,401

 
2,869

 
5,040

 
15,270

 
20,310

 
(5,035
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Village West
Allentown, PA
 

 
4,180

 
23,200

 
1,480

 
4,180

 
24,680

 
28,860

 
(6,402
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Park Hills Plaza
Altoona, PA
 

 
4,390

 
22,521

 
1,994

 
4,390

 
24,515

 
28,905

 
(7,348
)
 
1985
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Bensalem Square
Bensalem, PA
 

 
1,800

 
5,826

 
149

 
1,800

 
5,975

 
7,775

 
(1,797
)
 
1986
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Bethel Park Shopping Center
Bethel Park, PA
 
(9,358
)
 
3,060

 
18,299

 
1,865

 
3,060

 
20,164

 
23,224

 
(6,999
)
 
1965
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Bethlehem Square
Bethlehem, PA
 

 
8,830

 
36,724

 
1,746

 
8,830

 
38,470

 
47,300

 
(11,138
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Lehigh Shopping Center
Bethlehem, PA
 

 
6,980

 
32,744

 
3,344

 
6,980

 
36,088

 
43,068

 
(12,601
)
 
1955
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Bristol Park
Bristol, PA
 

 
3,180

 
20,972

 
1,463

 
3,180

 
22,435

 
25,615

 
(7,300
)
 
1993
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Chalfont Village Shopping Center
Chalfont, PA
 

 
1,040

 
3,714

 
(82
)
 
1,040

 
3,632

 
4,672

 
(914
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
New Britain Village Square
Chalfont, PA
 

 
4,250

 
24,130

 
1,619

 
4,250

 
25,749

 
29,999

 
(5,974
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Collegeville Shopping Center
Collegeville, PA
 

 
3,410

 
6,564

 
3,798

 
3,410

 
10,362

 
13,772

 
(2,168
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Whitemarsh Shopping Center
Conshohocken, PA
 

 
3,410

 
11,607

 
537

 
3,410

 
12,144

 
15,554

 
(3,053
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Valley Fair
Devon, PA
 

 
1,810

 
8,128

 
1,468

 
1,810

 
9,596

 
11,406

 
(3,984
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Dickson City Crossings
Dickson City, PA
 

 
3,780

 
30,213

 
1,670

 
4,800

 
30,863

 
35,663

 
(9,650
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Dillsburg Shopping Center
Dillsburg, PA
 

 
1,670

 
15,799

 
1,433

 
1,670

 
17,232

 
18,902

 
(4,935
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Barn Plaza
Doylestown, PA
 

 
8,780

 
28,452

 
2,078

 
8,780

 
30,530

 
39,310

 
(9,281
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Pilgrim Gardens
Drexel Hill, PA
 

 
2,090

 
4,890

 
4,526

 
2,090

 
9,416

 
11,506

 
(2,541
)
 
1955
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Mount Carmel Plaza
Glenside, PA
 

 
380

 
839

 
69

 
380

 
908

 
1,288

 
(228
)
 
1975
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Kline Plaza
Harrisburg, PA
 

 
2,300

 
12,834

 
1,534

 
2,300

 
14,368

 
16,668

 
(6,697
)
 
1952
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
New Garden Center
Kennett Square, PA
 
(2,019
)
 
2,240

 
6,752

 
1,684

 
2,240

 
8,436

 
10,676

 
(2,567
)
 
1979
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Stone Mill Plaza
Lancaster, PA
 

 
2,490

 
12,445

 
477

 
2,490

 
12,922

 
15,412

 
(4,060
)
 
2008
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Woodbourne Square
Langhorne, PA
 

 
1,640

 
4,081

 
454

 
1,640

 
4,535

 
6,175

 
(1,087
)
 
1984
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
North Penn Market Place
Lansdale, PA
 

 
3,060

 
5,008

 
1,191

 
3,060

 
6,199

 
9,259

 
(1,453
)
 
1977
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
New Holland Shopping Center
New Holland, PA
 

 
890

 
3,340

 
545

 
890

 
3,885

 
4,775

 
(1,426
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Village at Newtown
Newtown, PA
 

 
7,690

 
36,534

 
7,289

 
7,690

 
43,823

 
51,513

 
(8,529
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Cherry Square
Northampton, PA
 

 
950

 
6,804

 
131

 
950

 
6,935

 
7,885

 
(2,655
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Ivyridge
Philadelphia, PA
 
(13,054
)
 
7,100

 
18,292

 
1,749

 
7,100

 
20,041

 
27,141

 
(3,925
)
 
1963
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Roosevelt Mall
Philadelphia, PA
 
(46,536
)
 
8,820

 
87,603

 
5,658

 
8,820

 
93,261

 
102,081

 
(23,831
)
 
1964
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Shoppes at Valley Forge
Phoenixville, PA
 

 
2,010

 
12,590

 
595

 
2,010

 
13,185

 
15,195

 
(4,798
)
 
2003
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
County Line Plaza
Souderton, PA
 

 
910

 
7,608

 
2,077

 
910

 
9,685

 
10,595

 
(3,628
)
 
1971
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
69th Street Plaza
Upper Darby, PA
 

 
640

 
4,362

 
81

 
640

 
4,443

 
5,083

 
(1,441
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Warminster Towne Center
Warminster, PA
 

 
4,310

 
35,284

 
1,503

 
4,310

 
36,787

 
41,097

 
(9,255
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Shops at Prospect
West Hempfield, PA
 

 
760

 
6,454

 
487

 
760

 
6,941

 
7,701

 
(2,058
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years

F-47



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subsequent to Acquisition
 
Gross Amount at Which Carried
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Life on Which Depreciated - Latest Income Statement
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
 
at the Close of the Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Encumbrances
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
Total
 
Accumulated Depreciation
 
Year Constructed(1)
 
Date Acquired
 
Whitehall Square
Whitehall, PA
 

 
4,350

 
31,016

 
1,606

 
4,350

 
32,622

 
36,972

 
(8,503
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Wilkes-Barre Township Marketplace
Wilkes-Barre , PA
 

 
2,180

 
16,636

 
2,066

 
2,180

 
18,702

 
20,882

 
(5,992
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Belfair Towne Village
Bluffton, SC
 

 
4,265

 
31,129

 
1,073

 
4,265

 
32,202

 
36,467

 
(5,563
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Milestone Plaza
Greenville, SC
 

 
2,563

 
15,506

 
2,309

 
2,563

 
17,815

 
20,378

 
(2,670
)
 
1995
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Circle Center
Hilton Head, SC
 

 
3,010

 
5,773

 
428

 
3,010

 
6,201

 
9,211

 
(2,034
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Island Plaza
James Island, SC
 

 
2,940

 
8,805

 
1,790

 
2,940

 
10,595

 
13,535

 
(4,080
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Festival Centre
North Charleston, SC
 

 
3,630

 
8,449

 
5,879

 
3,630

 
14,328

 
17,958

 
(4,341
)
 
1987
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Fairview Corners I & II
Simpsonville, SC
 

 
2,370

 
16,672

 
1,981

 
2,370

 
18,653

 
21,023

 
(4,941
)
 
2003
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Hillcrest Market Place
Spartanburg, SC
 

 
4,190

 
34,172

 
5,250

 
4,190

 
39,422

 
43,612

 
(11,423
)
 
1965
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Shoppes at Hickory Hollow
Antioch, TN
 

 
3,650

 
10,206

 
603

 
3,650

 
10,809

 
14,459

 
(3,664
)
 
1986
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
East Ridge Crossing
Chattanooga , TN
 
(3,305
)
 
1,230

 
4,007

 
179

 
1,230

 
4,186

 
5,416

 
(1,533
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Watson Glen Shopping Center
Franklin, TN
 

 
5,220

 
13,451

 
2,382

 
5,220

 
15,833

 
21,053

 
(5,147
)
 
1988
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Williamson Square
Franklin, TN
 

 
7,730

 
22,403

 
6,606

 
7,730

 
29,009

 
36,739

 
(10,704
)
 
1988
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Greensboro Village
Gallatin, TN
 

 
1,503

 
13,369

 
280

 
1,503

 
13,649

 
15,152

 
(2,518
)
 
2005
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Greeneville Commons
Greeneville, TN
 

 
2,880

 
13,074

 
548

 
2,880

 
13,622

 
16,502

 
(5,606
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Oakwood Commons
Hermitage, TN
 

 
6,840

 
17,835

 
3,369

 
6,840

 
21,204

 
28,044

 
(7,243
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Kimball Crossing
Kimball, TN
 

 
1,860

 
18,473

 
993

 
1,860

 
19,466

 
21,326

 
(9,466
)
 
2007
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Kingston Overlook
Knoxville, TN
 
(5,574
)
 
2,060

 
5,499

 
1,743

 
2,060

 
7,242

 
9,302

 
(2,087
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Farrar Place
Manchester, TN
 
(1,083
)
 
470

 
2,760

 
432

 
470

 
3,192

 
3,662

 
(1,287
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
The Commons at Wolfcreek
Memphis, TN
 

 
22,530

 
50,197

 
20,404

 
23,239

 
69,892

 
93,131

 
(16,222
)
 
2014
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Georgetown Square
Murfreesboro, TN
 
(5,709
)
 
3,250

 
7,405

 
2,011

 
3,716

 
8,950

 
12,666

 
(2,595
)
 
2003
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Nashboro Village
Nashville, TN
 

 
2,243

 
11,564

 
205

 
2,243

 
11,769

 
14,012

 
(2,497
)
 
1998
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Commerce Central
Tullahoma, TN
 
(6,558
)
 
1,240

 
12,143

 
365

 
1,240

 
12,508

 
13,748

 
(5,004
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Merchant's Central
Winchester, TN
 

 
1,480

 
11,904

 
425

 
1,480

 
12,329

 
13,809

 
(4,216
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Palm Plaza
Aransas, TX
 
(1,214
)
 
680

 
2,218

 
552

 
680

 
2,770

 
3,450

 
(927
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Bardin Place Center
Arlington, TX
 

 
10,690

 
30,907

 
2,040

 
10,690

 
32,947

 
43,637

 
(7,861
)
 
1993
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Parmer Crossing
Austin, TX
 
(4,898
)
 
3,730

 
10,065

 
1,425

 
3,730

 
11,490

 
15,220

 
(3,316
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Baytown Shopping Center
Baytown, TX
 
(3,643
)
 
3,410

 
6,465

 
592

 
3,410

 
7,057

 
10,467

 
(2,812
)
 
1987
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Cedar Bellaire
Bellaire, TX
 
(2,107
)
 
2,760

 
4,179

 
84

 
2,760

 
4,263

 
7,023

 
(1,036
)
 
1994
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
El Camino
Bellaire, TX
 
(1,579
)
 
1,320

 
3,632

 
274

 
1,320

 
3,906

 
5,226

 
(1,521
)
 
2008
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Bryan Square
Bryan, TX
 
(1,229
)
 
820

 
2,358

 
110

 
820

 
2,468

 
3,288

 
(1,006
)
 
2008
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Townshire
Bryan, TX
 

 
1,790

 
6,356

 
661

 
1,790

 
7,017

 
8,807

 
(2,650
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Plantation Plaza
Clute, TX
 

 
1,090

 
7,207

 
115

 
1,090

 
7,322

 
8,412

 
(3,208
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Central Station
College Station, TX
 
(11,121
)
 
4,340

 
21,179

 
2,325

 
4,340

 
23,504

 
27,844

 
(6,075
)
 
1976
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Rock Prairie Crossing
College Station, TX
 

 
2,401

 
13,436

 
95

 
2,401

 
13,531

 
15,932

 
(4,736
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Carmel Village
Corpus Christi, TX
 
(1,990
)
 
1,900

 
4,198

 
701

 
1,900

 
4,899

 
6,799

 
(1,369
)
 
1993
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Five Points
Corpus Christi, TX
 

 
2,760

 
16,464

 
12,066

 
2,760

 
28,530

 
31,290

 
(7,164
)
 
1985
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Claremont Village
Dallas, TX
 
(1,619
)
 
1,700

 
2,953

 
154

 
1,700

 
3,107

 
4,807

 
(1,864
)
 
1976
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Jeff Davis
Dallas, TX
 
(2,065
)
 
1,390

 
2,937

 
259

 
1,390

 
3,196

 
4,586

 
(1,025
)
 
1975
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Stevens Park Village
Dallas, TX
 
(1,756
)
 
1,270

 
2,350

 
1,382

 
1,270

 
3,732

 
5,002

 
(1,309
)
 
1974
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Webb Royal Plaza
Dallas, TX
 
(3,198
)
 
2,470

 
4,666

 
1,810

 
2,470

 
6,476

 
8,946

 
(2,026
)
 
1961
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Wynnewood Village
Dallas, TX
 
(11,910
)
 
16,427

 
40,688

 
4,216

 
16,427

 
44,904

 
61,331

 
(12,602
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Parktown
Deer Park, TX
 
(3,512
)
 
2,790

 
6,930

 
862

 
2,790

 
7,792

 
10,582

 
(3,614
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Kenworthy Crossing
El Paso, TX
 

 
2,370

 
5,396

 
369

 
2,370

 
5,765

 
8,135

 
(1,726
)
 
2003
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Preston Ridge
Frisco, TX
 

 
25,820

 
122,667

 
13,436

 
25,820

 
136,103

 
161,923

 
(32,844
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Forest Hills Village
Ft. Worth, TX
 
(1,457
)
 
1,220

 
2,779

 
139

 
1,220

 
2,918

 
4,138

 
(1,233
)
 
1968
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Ridglea Plaza
Ft. Worth, TX
 
(6,275
)
 
2,770

 
16,033

 
342

 
2,770

 
16,375

 
19,145

 
(5,524
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Trinity Commons
Ft. Worth, TX
 

 
5,780

 
26,015

 
2,103

 
5,780

 
28,118

 
33,898

 
(9,349
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Village Plaza
Garland, TX
 
(3,239
)
 
3,230

 
6,529

 
984

 
3,230

 
7,513

 
10,743

 
(2,298
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
North Hills Village
Haltom City, TX
 
(453
)
 
940

 
2,378

 
114

 
940

 
2,492

 
3,432

 
(955
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Highland Village Town Center
Highland Village, TX
 
(3,562
)
 
3,370

 
5,269

 
482

 
3,370

 
5,751

 
9,121

 
(1,235
)
 
1996
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Bay Forest
Houston, TX
 
(2,868
)
 
1,500

 
6,541

 
87

 
1,500

 
6,628

 
8,128

 
(2,246
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Beltway South
Houston, TX
 

 
3,340

 
9,666

 
473

 
3,340

 
10,139

 
13,479

 
(3,164
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Braes Heights
Houston, TX
 
(4,916
)
 
1,700

 
14,971

 
1,505

 
1,700

 
16,476

 
18,176

 
(3,805
)
 
2018
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Braes Link
Houston, TX
 

 
850

 
6,479

 
175

 
850

 
6,654

 
7,504

 
(1,381
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years

F-48



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subsequent to Acquisition
 
Gross Amount at Which Carried
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Life on Which Depreciated - Latest Income Statement
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Cost to Company
 
 
at the Close of the Period
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Encumbrances
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
 
Land
 
Building & Improvements
 
Total
 
Accumulated Depreciation
 
Year Constructed(1)
 
Date Acquired
 
Braes Oaks Center
Houston, TX
 
(1,317
)
 
1,310

 
3,743

 
594

 
1,310

 
4,337

 
5,647

 
(1,030
)
 
1992
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Braesgate
Houston, TX
 

 
1,570

 
2,723

 
118

 
1,570

 
2,841

 
4,411

 
(1,501
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Broadway
Houston, TX
 
(2,429
)
 
1,720

 
5,362

 
997

 
1,720

 
6,359

 
8,079

 
(1,954
)
 
2006
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Clear Lake Camino South
Houston, TX
 
(4,939
)
 
3,320

 
11,916

 
872

 
3,320

 
12,788

 
16,108

 
(3,466
)
 
1964
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Hearthstone Corners
Houston, TX
 

 
5,240

 
13,586

 
1,023

 
5,240

 
14,609

 
19,849

 
(5,556
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Jester Village
Houston, TX
 

 
1,380

 
4,411

 
326

 
1,380

 
4,737

 
6,117

 
(1,114
)
 
1988
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Jones Plaza
Houston, TX
 

 
2,110

 
9,561

 
1,919

 
2,110

 
11,480

 
13,590

 
(1,906
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Jones Square
Houston, TX
 

 
3,210

 
10,614

 
237

 
3,210

 
10,851

 
14,061

 
(3,557
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Maplewood
Houston, TX
 
(2,634
)
 
1,790

 
5,438

 
314

 
1,790

 
5,752

 
7,542

 
(2,096
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Merchants Park
Houston, TX
 
(12,349
)
 
6,580

 
31,453

 
2,890

 
6,580

 
34,343

 
40,923

 
(9,812
)
 
2009
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Northgate
Houston, TX
 
(936
)
 
740

 
1,320

 
223

 
740

 
1,543

 
2,283

 
(615
)
 
1972
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Northshore
Houston, TX
 
(9,969
)
 
5,970

 
21,998

 
3,005

 
5,970

 
25,003

 
30,973

 
(6,793
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Northtown Plaza
Houston, TX
 
(7,489
)
 
4,990

 
17,014

 
1,977

 
4,990

 
18,991

 
23,981

 
(4,486
)
 
1960
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Northwood Plaza
Houston, TX
 

 
2,730

 
10,023

 
1,107

 
2,730

 
11,130

 
13,860

 
(3,817
)
 
1972
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Orange Grove
Houston, TX
 

 
3,670

 
15,444

 
1,487

 
3,670

 
16,931

 
20,601

 
(5,913
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Pinemont Shopping Center
Houston, TX
 

 
1,673

 
4,563

 
3

 
1,673

 
4,566

 
6,239

 
(2,227
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Royal Oaks Village
Houston, TX
 

 
4,620

 
29,379

 
752

 
4,620

 
30,131

 
34,751

 
(7,617
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Tanglewilde Center
Houston, TX
 
(2,915
)
 
1,620

 
7,088

 
378

 
1,620

 
7,466

 
9,086

 
(2,353
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Westheimer Commons
Houston, TX
 

 
5,160

 
11,529

 
4,287

 
5,160

 
15,816

 
20,976

 
(5,141
)
 
1984
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Fry Road Crossing
Katy, TX
 

 
6,030

 
19,659

 
1,121

 
6,030

 
20,780

 
26,810

 
(6,887
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Washington Square
Kaufman, TX
 
(891
)
 
880

 
1,930

 
791

 
880

 
2,721

 
3,601

 
(842
)
 
1978
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Jefferson Park
Mount Pleasant, TX
 
(2,226
)
 
870

 
4,919

 
1,516

 
870

 
6,435

 
7,305

 
(2,184
)
 
2001
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Winwood Town Center
Odessa, TX
 

 
2,850

 
27,507

 
2,533

 
2,850

 
30,040

 
32,890

 
(9,367
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Crossroads Centre - Pasadena
Pasadena, TX
 
(7,786
)
 
4,660

 
10,870

 
521

 
4,660

 
11,391

 
16,051

 
(4,081
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Spencer Square
Pasadena, TX
 
(11,330
)
 
5,360

 
19,356

 
991

 
5,360

 
20,347

 
25,707

 
(6,411
)
 
1998
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Pearland Plaza
Pearland, TX
 

 
3,020

 
8,431

 
1,356

 
3,020

 
9,787

 
12,807

 
(3,010
)
 
1995
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Market Plaza
Plano, TX
 
(7,257
)
 
6,380

 
19,762

 
1,085

 
6,380

 
20,847

 
27,227

 
(6,409
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Preston Park Village
Plano, TX
 

 
8,506

 
79,829

 
3,144

 
8,506

 
82,973

 
91,479

 
(13,404
)
 
1985
 
Oct-13
 
40 years
Northshore Plaza
Portland, TX
 

 
3,510

 
7,979

 
884

 
3,510

 
8,863

 
12,373

 
(3,981
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Klein Square
Spring, TX
 
(3,219
)
 
1,220

 
6,715

 
835

 
1,220

 
7,550

 
8,770

 
(1,921
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Keegan's Meadow
Stafford, TX
 

 
3,300

 
9,671

 
1,279

 
3,300

 
10,950

 
14,250

 
(3,200
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Texas City Bay
Texas City, TX
 
(5,999
)
 
3,780

 
15,360

 
760

 
3,780

 
16,120

 
19,900

 
(4,329
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Windvale Center
The Woodlands, TX
 
(4,295
)
 
3,460

 
9,282

 
574

 
3,460

 
9,856

 
13,316

 
(2,689
)
 
2002
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
The Centre at Navarro
Victoria, TX
 
(3,356
)
 
1,490

 
6,389

 
335

 
1,490

 
6,724

 
8,214

 
(1,110
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Spradlin Farm
Christiansburg, VA
 

 
3,860

 
22,355

 
1,969

 
3,860

 
24,324

 
28,184

 
(6,676
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Culpeper Town Square
Culpeper, VA
 

 
3,200

 
9,061

 
1,147

 
3,200

 
10,208

 
13,408

 
(4,148
)
 
1999
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Hanover Square
Mechanicsville, VA
 

 
3,540

 
14,621

 
1,882

 
3,540

 
16,503

 
20,043

 
(3,633
)
 
1991
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Tuckernuck Square
Richmond, VA
 

 
2,400

 
9,294

 
1,426

 
2,400

 
10,720

 
13,120

 
(2,417
)
 
1981
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Cave Spring Corners
Roanoke, VA
 

 
3,060

 
11,178

 
646

 
3,060

 
11,824

 
14,884

 
(4,256
)
 
2005
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Hunting Hills
Roanoke, VA
 

 
1,150

 
7,406

 
2,248

 
1,150

 
9,654

 
10,804

 
(2,648
)
 
1989
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Valley Commons
Salem , VA
 
(2,074
)
 
220

 
1,041

 
130

 
220

 
1,171

 
1,391

 
(237
)
 
1988
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Lake Drive Plaza
Vinton, VA
 
(7,437
)
 
2,330

 
12,336

 
1,110

 
2,330

 
13,446

 
15,776

 
(4,753
)
 
2008
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Hilltop Plaza
Virginia Beach, VA
 

 
5,154

 
21,305

 
2,470

 
5,154

 
23,775

 
28,929

 
(6,535
)
 
2010
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Ridgeview Centre
Wise, VA
 
(3,906
)
 
2,080

 
8,044

 
2,225

 
2,080

 
10,269

 
12,349

 
(2,751
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Rutland Plaza
Rutland, VT
 

 
2,130

 
20,904

 
454

 
2,130

 
21,358

 
23,488

 
(6,054
)
 
1997
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Spring Mall
Greenfield, WI
 

 
2,540

 
15,864

 
594

 
2,540

 
16,458

 
18,998

 
(3,902
)
 
2003
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Mequon Pavilions
Mequon, WI
 

 
7,520

 
28,244

 
5,206

 
7,520

 
33,450

 
40,970

 
(8,241
)
 
1967
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Moorland Square Shopping Ctr
New Berlin, WI
 

 
2,080

 
9,050

 
1,015

 
2,080

 
10,065

 
12,145

 
(3,240
)
 
1990
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Paradise Pavilion
West Bend, WI
 

 
1,510

 
15,536

 
965

 
1,510

 
16,501

 
18,011

 
(5,845
)
 
2000
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Moundsville Plaza
Moundsville, WV
 

 
1,650

 
10,103

 
1,221

 
1,650

 
11,324

 
12,974

 
(4,238
)
 
2004
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Grand Central Plaza
Parkersburg, WV
 

 
670

 
5,704

 
242

 
670

 
5,946

 
6,616

 
(1,658
)
 
1986
 
Jun-11
 
40 years
Remaining portfolio
Various
 

 
5,385

 

 
24,228

 
5,805

 
23,808

 
29,613

 
(364
)
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
$
(902,717
)
 
$
1,953,915

 
$
7,863,216

 
$
1,104,360

 
$
1,984,309

 
$
8,937,182

 
$
10,921,491

 
$
(2,361,070
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
        (1) Year constructed is calculated based on the year of the most recent redevelopment of the shopping center or based on year built if no redevelopment has occurred.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes was approximately $11.9 billion at December 31, 2017.

F-49



 
Year Ending December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
[a] Reconciliation of total real estate carrying value is as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
      Balance at beginning of period
$
11,009,058

 
$
10,932,850

 
$
10,802,249

      Acquisitions and improvements
408,570

 
236,590

 
252,242

      Real estate held for sale
(34,169
)
 

 

      Impairment of real estate
(27,300
)
 
(3,176
)
 

      Cost of property sold
(358,972
)
 
(88,585
)
 
(51,264
)
      Write-off of assets no longer in service
(75,696
)
 
(68,621
)
 
(70,377
)
      Balance at end of period
$
10,921,491

 
$
11,009,058

 
$
10,932,850

 
 
 
 
 
 
[b] Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
      Balance at beginning of period
$
2,167,054

 
$
1,880,685

 
$
1,549,234

      Depreciation expense
342,035

 
361,723

 
396,380

      Property sold
(87,169
)
 
(19,733
)
 
(7,034
)
      Write-off of assets no longer in service
(60,850
)
 
(55,621
)
 
(57,895
)
      Balance at end of period
$
2,361,070

 
$
2,167,054

 
$
1,880,685


F-50