BSQUARE CORP /WA - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-27687
BSQUARE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Washington | 91-1650880 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
110 110th Avenue NE, Suite 200, Bellevue WA |
98004 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(425) 519-5900
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of July 31, 2012: 10,964,573
Table of Contents
BSQUARE CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2012
Page | ||||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 1 |
3 | |||||
Item 2 |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
15 | ||||
Item 3 |
20 | |||||
Item 4 |
20 | |||||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 1A |
21 | |||||
Item 6 |
21 |
2
Table of Contents
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
BSQUARE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
June 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 10,515 | $ | 8,505 | ||||
Short-term investments |
9,402 | 9,619 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $366 at June 30, 2012 and $311 at December 31, 2011 |
15,013 | 13,403 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
344 | 520 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1,168 | 1,281 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
36,442 | 33,328 | ||||||
Equipment, furniture and leasehold improvements, net |
895 | 1,037 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
1,214 | 1,390 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
875 | 875 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
2,537 | 2,302 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,738 | 3,738 | ||||||
Other non-current assets |
125 | 122 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 45,826 | $ | 42,792 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Third-party software fees payable |
$ | 10,683 | $ | 8,460 | ||||
Accounts payable |
338 | 695 | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
2,429 | 2,645 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses and liabilities |
2,666 | 2,330 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
1,790 | 1,233 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
17,906 | 15,363 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
178 | 184 | ||||||
Long-term tax liability |
211 | 210 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, no par value: 37,500,000 shares authorized; 10,947,478 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and 10,874,050 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 |
128,203 | 127,318 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(630 | ) | (631 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit |
(100,042 | ) | (99,652 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total shareholders equity |
27,531 | 27,035 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 45,826 | $ | 42,792 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
BSQUARE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Software |
$ | 17,794 | $ | 17,059 | $ | 36,010 | $ | 35,808 | ||||||||
Service |
6,711 | 6,363 | 14,043 | 13,622 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
24,505 | 23,422 | 50,053 | 49,430 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Software |
14,757 | 13,108 | 29,364 | 28,377 | ||||||||||||
Service |
5,358 | 5,207 | 11,497 | 10,696 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total cost of revenue |
20,115 | 18,315 | 40,861 | 39,073 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
4,390 | 5,107 | 9,192 | 10,357 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
3,552 | 4,108 | 7,691 | 8,039 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
1,108 | 985 | 2,048 | 1,899 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
4,660 | 5,093 | 9,739 | 9,938 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
(270 | ) | 14 | (547 | ) | 419 | ||||||||||
Other income, net |
103 | 34 | 94 | 42 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(167 | ) | 48 | (453 | ) | 461 | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
(35 | ) | (27 | ) | 63 | (256 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (202 | ) | $ | 21 | $ | (390 | ) | $ | 205 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic income (loss) per share |
$ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.02 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted income (loss) per share |
$ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.02 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Shares used in calculation of income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
10,922 | 10,563 | 10,898 | 10,497 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted |
10,922 | 11,529 | 10,898 | 11,657 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): Net income (loss) |
$ | (202 | ) | $ | 21 | $ | (390 | ) | $ | 205 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation, net of tax |
(29 | ) | (40 | ) | (11 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||||||
Change in unrealized gains on investments, net of tax |
(1 | ) | 4 | 12 | 3 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (expense) |
(30 | ) | (36 | ) | 1 | (64 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (232 | ) | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (389 | ) | $ | 141 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
BSQUARE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (390 | ) | $ | 205 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Realized gain on investments |
| (19 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
483 | 402 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
892 | 1,107 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
(58 | ) | 145 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
(1,608 | ) | 741 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
111 | (385 | ) | |||||
Third-party software fees payable |
2,223 | (2,011 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(241 | ) | 53 | |||||
Deferred revenue |
556 | 95 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
(6 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
1,962 | 298 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of equipment and furniture |
(164 | ) | (339 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments |
5,200 | 9,675 | ||||||
Purchases of short-term investments |
(4,965 | ) | (12,064 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of auction rate securities |
| 25 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used by) investing activities |
71 | (2,703 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activitiesproceeds from exercise of stock options |
66 | 209 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(89 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
2,010 | (2,304 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
8,505 | 10,814 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 10,515 | $ | 8,510 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
BSQUARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of BSQUARE Corporation (BSQUARE) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim financial reporting and include the accounts of BSQUARE and our wholly owned subsidiaries. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In our opinion, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all material adjustments, all of which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary to present fairly our financial position as of June 30, 2012 and our operating results and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The accompanying financial information as of December 31, 2011 is derived from audited financial statements. Preparing financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Examples include provisions for bad debts and income taxes, estimates of progress on professional engineering service arrangements and bonus accruals. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. All intercompany balances have been eliminated.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued amended guidance related to the presentation of comprehensive income which requires entities to present net income and other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income. We adopted the requirements of the new guidance effective January 1, 2012 using a single continuous statement for all periods presented. The adoption did not impact our financial position or results of operations.
Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic income or loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, and excludes any dilutive effects of common stock equivalent shares, such as options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. Restricted stock awards (RSAs) are considered outstanding and included in the computation of basic income or loss per share when underlying restrictions expire and the awards are no longer forfeitable. Restricted stock units (RSUs), which vest over a period of one to four years, are considered outstanding and included in the computation of basic income or loss per share only when vested. Diluted income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Common stock equivalent shares are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive. Unvested but outstanding RSUs and RSAs which are forfeitable are included in the diluted income per share calculation. In a period where we are in a net loss position, the diluted loss per share is computed using the basic share count.
6
Table of Contents
2. Cash and Investments
Cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and restricted cash consist of the following (in thousands):
June 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
Cash |
$ | 2,323 | $ | 1,428 | ||||
Cash equivalents: |
||||||||
Corporate debt |
750 | 501 | ||||||
Money market funds |
7,442 | 6,576 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cash equivalents |
8,192 | 7,077 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
10,515 | 8,505 | ||||||
Short-term investments: |
||||||||
U.S. agency securities |
| 1,751 | ||||||
Municipal securities |
355 | 355 | ||||||
Corporate commercial paper |
2,299 | 1,250 | ||||||
Foreign government bonds |
501 | 500 | ||||||
Corporate debt |
6,247 | 5,763 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total short-term investments |
9,402 | 9,619 | ||||||
Restricted cashmoney market fund |
875 | 875 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cash, cash equivalents, investments and restricted cash |
$ | 20,792 | $ | 18,999 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized gains and losses on our short-term investments were not material as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Our restricted cash balance at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 relates to a letter of credit which will continue to secure our corporate headquarter lease obligation through its expiration in 2014.
3. Fair Value Measurements
We measure our cash equivalents, marketable securities, and the earn-out liability associated with our acquisition of MPC Data Limited (MPC) (see Note 4) at fair value. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is established as a basis for considering such assumptions and for inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
Level 1: | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | |
Level 2: | Directly or indirectly observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs used in models or other valuation methodologies. | |
Level 3: | Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. The inputs require significant management judgment or estimation. |
We classify our cash equivalents and marketable securities within Level 1 or Level 2 because our cash equivalents and marketable securities are valued using quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market observable inputs. We classify our earn-out liability associated with MPC within Level 3 as it is valued using inputs such as managements estimation of future sales. Some of the inputs to these models are unobservable in the market and are significant.
7
Table of Contents
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized below (in thousands):
June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Direct or Indirect Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Total | |||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents: |
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 7,442 | $ | | $ | | $ | 7,442 | ||||||||
Corporate debt |
| 750 | | 750 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total cash equivalents |
7,442 | 750 | | 8,192 | ||||||||||||
Short-term investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
| 355 | | 355 | ||||||||||||
Corporate commercial paper |
| 2,299 | | 2,299 | ||||||||||||
Foreign government bonds |
| 501 | | 501 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt |
| 6,247 | | 6,247 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total short-term investments |
| 9,402 | $ | | 9,402 | |||||||||||
Restricted cashmoney market fund |
875 | | | 875 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 8,317 | $ | 10,152 | $ | | $ | 18,469 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
MPC earn-out liability |
$ | | $ | | $ | 696 | $ | 696 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Direct or Indirect Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Total | |||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents: |
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 6,576 | $ | | $ | | $ | 6,576 | ||||||||
Corporate debt |
| 501 | | 501 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total cash equivalents |
6,576 | 501 | | 7,077 | ||||||||||||
Short-term investments: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. agency securities |
| 1,751 | | 1,751 | ||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
| 355 | | 355 | ||||||||||||
Corporate commercial paper |
| 1,250 | | 1,250 | ||||||||||||
Foreign government bonds |
| 500 | | 500 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt |
| 5,763 | | 5,763 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total short-term investments |
| 9,619 | $ | | 9,619 | |||||||||||
Restricted cashmoney market fund |
875 | | | 875 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,451 | $ | 10,120 | $ | | $ | 17,571 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
MPC earn-out liability |
$ | | $ | | $ | 766 | $ | 766 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Acquisition
On September 11, 2011, we completed the acquisition of MPC, a United Kingdom based provider of embedded software engineering services.
We acquired all outstanding shares of MPC preferred and common stock in exchange for total consideration of $7.0 million, which included an earn-out which is re-measured to estimated fair value each reporting period based on specific revenue earned and forecasted in designated regions of Europe through September 30, 2012. This earn-out had an estimated fair value of $810,000 as of the acquisition date, and $696,000 as of June 30, 2012. If actual applicable revenue exceeds our estimates by 10%, the impact on the earn-out would be and additional $24,000. We also acquired $1.5 million in cash and cash equivalents as part of the acquisition, for a net estimated total cash price of $5.5 million.
8
Table of Contents
The business combination was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, which requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date measured at their fair values, including intangible assets acquired consisting of trade names and trademarks, non-compete agreements, and customer relationships. The acquisition of MPC was structured as a stock purchase and therefore the values assigned to the intangible assets and goodwill are not deductible for tax purposes. Deferred tax liabilities of $233,000 were recognized as part of the transaction. The excess of the acquisition consideration, including the initial estimated fair value of the earn-out, over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. Our allocation of the acquisition consideration to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of the acquisition is as follows (in thousands):
Acquisition consideration |
$ | 7,038 | ||
Net assets acquired: |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
1,481 | |||
Other current assets |
1,124 | |||
Property, equipment, and furniture |
103 | |||
Intangible assetscustomer relationships |
973 | |||
Intangible assetsnon-compete agreements |
206 | |||
Intangible assetstrade names and trademarks |
96 | |||
Current liabilities |
(473 | ) | ||
Long-term tax liabilities |
(210 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net assets acquired |
3,300 | |||
|
|
|||
Goodwill |
$ | 3,738 | ||
|
|
Of the intangible assets acquired, customer relationships had a weighted-average useful life of 10 years, non-compete agreements had a weighted-average useful life of two years, and trade names and trademarks had a weighted-average useful life of one year. We assess the fair value of the earn-out associated with the acquisition each period using Level 3 inputs represented by managements estimation of future applicable engineering service revenue attributable to MPC through September 30, 2012. Changes to the estimated fair value of the earn-out are recognized as other income (expense), net in the period in which the changes occur.
Unaudited Pro Forma Results of Operations
Unaudited pro forma results of operations are being furnished solely for informational purposes and are not intended to represent or be indicative of the consolidated results of operations that we would have reported had the MPC acquisition been completed as of the dates and for the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of future results.
The unaudited pro forma results of operations data are derived from the consolidated financial statements of MPC and include pro forma adjustments relating to the MPC acquisition that are of a recurring nature representing pro forma amortization of intangible assets. The pro forma results were adjusted to assume all of the acquisition expenses directly related to MPC were incurred on January 1, 2011, and do not give effect to any cost savings, revenue synergies, integration or restructuring costs which may result from the MPC operations (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three months ended June 30, 2011 |
Six months ended June 30, 2011 |
|||||||
Net sales |
$ | 24,441 | $ | 51,988 | ||||
Gross profit |
$ | 5,383 | $ | 11,412 | ||||
Loss from operations |
$ | (293 | ) | $ | (254 | ) | ||
Loss before income taxes |
$ | (262 | ) | $ | (344 | ) | ||
Net loss |
$ | (289 | ) | $ | (586 | ) | ||
Basic loss per share |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||
Diluted loss per share |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) |
9
Table of Contents
5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
There was no change in the carrying amount of goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Intangible assets relate to developed technology, trade names and trademarks, customer relationships, and non-compete agreements that we acquired from TestQuest Inc. in November 2008 and from the acquisition of MPC in September 2011.
Information regarding our intangible assets as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is as follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Value |
||||||||||
Trade names and trademarks |
$ | 180 | $ | 151 | $ | 29 | ||||||
Customer relationships |
1,275 | 209 | 1,066 | |||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
196 | 77 | 119 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 1,651 | $ | 437 | $ | 1,214 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Value |
||||||||||
Trade names and trademarks |
$ | 180 | $ | 92 | $ | 88 | ||||||
Customer relationships |
1,275 | 142 | 1,133 | |||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
196 | 27 | 169 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 1,651 | $ | 261 | $ | 1,390 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense was $88,000 and $176,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and $83,000 and $167,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Amortization in future periods is expected to be as follows (in thousands):
Remainder of 2012 |
$ | 145 | ||
2013 |
206 | |||
2014 |
135 | |||
2015 |
135 | |||
2016 |
130 | |||
Thereafter |
463 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 1,214 | ||
|
|
6. Shareholders Equity
Stock Options
We have a Fourth Amended and Restated Stock Plan (the Stock Plan) and an inducement stock plan for newly hired employees (the Inducement Plan) (collectively, the Plans). Under the Plans, stock options may be granted with a fixed exercise price that is equivalent to fair market value on the date of grant. These options have a term of up to 10 years and vest over a predetermined period, generally four years. Incentive stock options granted under the Stock Plan may only be granted to our employees. The Plans also allow for awards of non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, RSAs and unrestricted stock awards, and RSUs. The Inducement Plan was established in connection with the MPC acquisition. Initially, 250,000 shares were allocated for award under the Inducement Plan. The number of shares available for award under the Inducement Plan may be modified by our Board of Directors, subject to SEC and NASDAQ limitations.
10
Table of Contents
Stock-Based Compensation
The estimated fair value of stock-based awards is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period of the award, net of estimated forfeitures. We estimate forfeitures of stock-based awards based on historical experience and expected future activity. The fair value of RSAs and RSUs is determined based on the number of shares granted and the quoted price of our common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of stock option awards is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of each vesting tranche as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option-pricing model. The BSM model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including expected volatility and option life. If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period. The fair values of our stock option grants were estimated with the following weighted average assumptions:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Dividend yield |
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||
Expected life |
4 years | 4 years | 4 years | 4 years | ||||||||||||
Expected volatility |
73 | % | 74 | % | 73 | % | 74 | % | ||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
0.6 | % | 1.3 | % | 0.6 | % | 1.5 | % |
The impact on our results of operations of recording stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Cost of revenue service |
$ | 100 | $ | 157 | $ | 207 | $ | 376 | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
278 | 415 | 622 | 654 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
30 | 35 | 63 | 77 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 408 | $ | 607 | $ | 892 | $ | 1,107 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Per diluted share |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Activity
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the Plans for the six months ended June 30, 2012:
Stock Options |
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2012 |
1,939,475 | $ | 4.49 | |||||||||||||
Granted at fair value |
164,875 | 3.44 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(29,476 | ) | 2.49 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(67,165 | ) | 3.73 | |||||||||||||
Expired |
(50,501 | ) | 9.84 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2012 |
1,957,208 | $ | 4.32 | 3.72 | $ | 395,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2012 |
1,872,527 | $ | 4.27 | 3.63 | $ | 391,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2012 |
1,373,749 | $ | 3.83 | 3.02 | $ | 353,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2012, total compensation cost related to stock options granted to employees but not yet recognized was $788,000, net of estimated forfeitures. This cost will be amortized on the straight-line method over a weighted-average period of approximately two years.
11
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes certain information about stock options for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Weighted-average grant-date fair value of option grants for the period |
$ | 1.88 | $ | 3.99 | $ | 2.23 | 4.61 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Options in-the-money at period end |
616,000 | 1,365,882 | 616,000 | 1,365,882 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised |
$ | 1,000 | $ | 209,000 | $ | 33,000 | $ | 751,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the quoted price of our common stock for the number of options that were in-the-money at period end or that were exercised during the period. We issue new shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options.
Restricted Stock Award Activity
The following table summarizes RSA activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012:
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per Share |
|||||||
Unvested at December 31, 2011 |
27,000 | $ | 6.49 | |||||
Granted |
| | ||||||
Vested |
(18,000 | ) | 7.33 | |||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Unvested at June 30, 2012 |
9,000 | $ | 4.82 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Expected to vest after June 30, 2012 |
8,100 | $ | 4.82 | |||||
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2012, total compensation cost related to RSAs granted but not yet recognized was $4,000, net of estimated forfeitures. This cost will be amortized on the straight-line method over a period of approximately 0.1 years.
Restricted Stock Unit Activity
The following table summarizes RSU activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012:
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|||||||
Unvested at December 31, 2011 |
241,248 | $ | 6.20 | |||||
Granted |
167,592 | 3.52 | ||||||
Vested |
(47,844 | ) | 5.15 | |||||
Forfeited |
(17,584 | ) | 6.28 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Unvested at June 30, 2012 |
343,412 | $ | 5.03 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Expected to vest after June 30, 2012 |
306,730 | $ | 4.94 | |||||
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2012, total compensation cost related to RSUs granted but not yet recognized was $1.2 million, net of estimated forfeitures. This cost will be amortized on the straight-line method over a period of approximately 2.1 years.
12
Table of Contents
Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance
The following table summarizes our shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the Plans at June 30, 2012:
June 30, 2012 |
||||
Stock options outstanding |
1,957,208 | |||
Restricted stock units outstanding |
343,412 | |||
Stock options available for future grant |
794,869 | |||
|
|
|||
Common stock reserved for future issuance |
3,095,489 | |||
|
|
7. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease and rent obligations
Our commitments include obligations outstanding under operating leases, which expire through 2018. We have lease commitments for office space in Bellevue, Washington; San Diego, California; Longmont, Colorado; Chanhassen, Minnesota; Dallas, Texas; Taipei, Taiwan; Beijing, China; Seoul, Korea; Nishi-Shinjuku, Japan; Munich, Germany; and Trowbridge, UK. We also lease office space on a month-to-month basis in Akron, Ohio.
If we default under the terms of our corporate headquarters lease in Bellevue, Washington, signed in February 2004, the landlord has the ability to demand payment for cash payments forgiven in 2004. The amount of the forgiven payments for which the landlord can demand repayment was $519,000 at June 30, 2012.
Rent expense was $423,000 and $903,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Rent expense was $385,000 and $767,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.
As of June 30, 2012, we had $875,000 pledged as collateral for a bank letter of credit under the terms of our headquarters facility lease. The pledged cash supporting the outstanding letter of credit is classified as restricted cash.
Future operating lease commitments are as follows by calendar year (in thousands):
Remainder of 2012 |
$ | 794 | ||
2013 |
1,366 | |||
2014 |
1,038 | |||
2015 |
268 | |||
2016 |
268 | |||
Thereafter |
235 | |||
|
|
|||
Total commitments |
$ | 3,969 | ||
|
|
8. Information about Geographic Areas
Our chief operating decision-makers (i.e., Chief Executive Officer and certain direct reports) review financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. There are no segment managers who are held accountable by our chief operating decision-makers, or anyone else, for operations, operating results, or planning for levels or components below the consolidated unit level. Accordingly, we consider ourselves to be in a single reporting segment and operating unit structure.
Revenue by geography is based on the billing address of the customer. The following table sets forth revenue and long-lived assets by geographic area (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Total revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 17,804 | $ | 18,347 | $ | 35,764 | $ | 37,703 | ||||||||
Asia |
5,456 | 4,368 | 11,218 | 10,050 | ||||||||||||
Europe |
1,244 | 677 | 3,044 | 1,634 | ||||||||||||
Other foreign |
1 | 30 | 27 | 43 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 24,505 | $ | 23,422 | $ | 50,053 | $ | 49,430 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Table of Contents
June 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
Long-lived assets: |
||||||||
North America |
$ | 4,363 | $ | 4,334 | ||||
Asia |
144 | 111 | ||||||
Europe |
4,877 | 5,019 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total long-lived assets |
$ | 9,384 | $ | 9,464 | ||||
|
|
|
|
9. Significant Risk Concentrations
Significant Customer
No customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenue for the three or six months ended June 30, 2012. Ford Motor Company (Ford) accounted for $2.4 million, or 10% of total revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $4.7 million, or 10% of total revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft) had an accounts receivable balance of $1.9 million, or 12% of total accounts receivable, as of June 30, 2012, all of which was subsequently collected. Ford had an accounts receivable of $1.6 million, or 12% of total accounts receivable, as of December 31, 2011, all of which was subsequently collected. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of total accounts receivable as of June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
Significant Supplier
We have OEM Distribution Agreements (ODAs) with Microsoft which enable us to sell Microsoft Windows Embedded operating systems to our customers in the United States, Canada, the Caribbean (excluding Cuba), Mexico, the European Union and the European Free Trade Association, which expire on December 31, 2012 or June 30, 2013, depending on the territory. We also have ODAs with Microsoft which allow us to sell Microsoft Windows Mobile operating systems in the Americas, Japan, Taiwan, Korea, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, which will expire on August 31, 2012 or December 31, 2012, depending on the territory.
Software sales under these agreements constitute a significant portion of our software revenue and total revenue. These agreements are typically renewed annually or semi-annually; however, there is no automatic renewal provision in any of these agreements. Further, these agreements can be terminated unilaterally by Microsoft at any time. Microsoft currently offers a rebate program to sell Microsoft Windows Embedded operating systems pursuant to which we earn money for achieving certain predefined objectives. Under this rebate program we earned $184,000 and $413,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and $161,000 and $343,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. These rebates are accounted for as a reduction in software cost of revenue.
14
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we, us, our and the Company refer to BSQUARE Corporation, a Washington corporation, and its subsidiaries.
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes. Some statements and information contained in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are not historical facts but are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act). In some cases, readers can identify forward- looking statements by terms such as may, will, should, expect, plan, intend, forecast, anticipate, believe, estimate, predict, potential, continue, or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology, which when used are meant to signify the statement as forward-looking. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and situations that are difficult to predict and that may cause our own, or our industrys actual results, to be materially different from the future results that are expressed or implied by these statements. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those anticipated or expressed in such statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those discussed in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 entitled Risk Factors, as well as those contained from time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We provide software solutions to companies that develop smart, connected devices. A smart, connected device is a dedicated purpose computing device that typically has a display, runs an operating system and may be connected to a network via a wired or wireless connection. Examples of smart devices include set-top boxes, home gateways, point-of-sale terminals, kiosks, voting machines, gaming platforms, tablets, handheld data collection devices, personal media players, smart phones and devices targeted at automotive applications. We primarily focus on smart devices that utilize embedded versions of the Microsoft Windows family of operating systems, specifically Windows CE, Windows XP Embedded and Windows Mobile. We also provide software solutions to customers developing devices utilizing other operating systems such as Android, QNX and Linux.
We have been providing software solutions to the smart device marketplace since our inception. Our customers include original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), original design manufacturers (ODMs) and enterprises, as well as silicon vendors (SVs) and peripheral vendors which purchase our software solutions for purposes of facilitating processor and peripheral sales to the aforementioned customer categories. In the case of enterprises, our customers include those which develop, market and distribute smart devices on their own behalf as well as those that purchase devices from OEMs or ODMs and require additional device software or testing. The software solutions we provide are utilized and deployed throughout various phases of our customers device life cycle, including design, development, customization, quality assurance and deployment.
Critical Accounting Judgments
Managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales, cost of sales and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. There have been no significant changes to the Companys critical accounting policies and estimates as described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
15
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table presents certain financial data as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated. Our historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results for any future period.
Three
Months Ended June 30, |
Six
Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Software |
73 | % | 73 | % | 72 | % | 72 | % | ||||||||
Service |
27 | 27 | 28 | 28 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Software |
60 | 56 | 59 | 57 | ||||||||||||
Service |
22 | 22 | 23 | 22 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total cost of revenue |
82 | 78 | 82 | 79 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
18 | 22 | 18 | 21 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
15 | 18 | 15 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
19 | 22 | 19 | 20 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
(1 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||
Other income, net |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(1 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(1 | )% | 0 | % | (1 | )% | 0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Our revenue is generated from the sale of software, both our own proprietary software and software of third parties that we resell, and the sale of engineering services. Total revenue increased $1.1 million, or 5%, to $24.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $23.4 million in the year-ago period. Total revenue increased $623,000, or 1%, to $50.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, from $49.4 million in the year-ago period. These increases were driven by higher sales of Microsoft Windows Embedded operating systems.
A year ago, our operations outside of North America consisted principally of operations in Taiwan, as well as relatively minor sales and/or support presences in China, India, Japan, Korea, and the United Kingdom. During 2011, we expanded our sales teams across Asia and our development presence in China and, in September, acquired the operations of MPC Data Limited (MPC) in the United Kingdom. The MPC acquisition positively impacted revenue by $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and drove total revenue in Europe to increase $567,000 and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to the year-ago periods. Additionally, sales to Asia increased $1.1 million and $1.2 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to the year-ago periods, primarily due to increased engineering services revenue from new customers in Japan. Revenue from our customers outside of North America represented 27% and 29% of our total revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to 22% and 24% in the year-ago periods, respectively.
16
Table of Contents
Software revenue
Software revenue consists of sales of third-party software and revenue realized from our own proprietary software products, which include software license sales, royalties from our software products, and support and maintenance revenue. Software revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was as follows (dollars in thousands):
Three months Ended June 30, |
Six months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Software revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Third-party software |
$ | 17,006 | $ | 15,336 | $ | 34,085 | $ | 32,666 | ||||||||
Proprietary software |
788 | 1,723 | 1,925 | 3,142 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total software revenue |
$ | 17,794 | $ | 17,059 | $ | 36,010 | $ | 35,808 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Software revenue as a percentage of total revenue |
73 | % | 73 | % | 72 | % | 72 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Third-party software revenue as a percentage of total software revenue |
96 | % | 90 | % | 95 | % | 91 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The vast majority of our third-party software revenue is comprised of sales of Microsoft Windows Embedded and Windows Mobile operating systems. Third-party software revenue increased $1.7 million, or 11%, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from the year-ago period. The increase was due primarily to higher sales of Microsoft Windows Embedded operating systems across all customer segments, offset in part by a decline in Microsoft Windows Mobile operating system sales, particularly in the APAC region, and a decline in Adobe Flash sales.
Third-party software revenue increased $1.4 million, or 4%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the year-ago period, driven by the same factors that accounted for the three-month increase.
Proprietary software revenue decreased $935,000, or 54%, to $788,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $1.7 million in the year-ago period. This decrease was driven by a significant sale of our Texas Instruments OMAP software during the three months ended June 30, 2011, which did not reoccur in the current period. Additionally, $263,000 in Snapdragon devkit sales were classified as proprietary software revenue in the year-ago period, which are now classified as third-party software revenue.
Proprietary software revenue decreased $1.2 million, or 39%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the year-ago period, driven by the same factors that accounted for the three-month decrease.
Service revenue
Service revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was as follows (dollars in thousands):
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Service revenue |
$ | 6,711 | $ | 6,363 | $ | 14,043 | $ | 13,622 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Service revenue as a percentage of total revenue |
27 | % | 27 | % | 28 | % | 28 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenue increased $348,000, or 5%, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from the year-ago period. This increase was the result of $1.1 million in service revenue from MPC as a result of our acquisition in September 2011 coupled with growth in APAC driven by a new major customer in Japan which contributed $624,000 in revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012. This increase was offset in part by a $1.2 million decline in North America service revenue led by a $690,000 decline in revenue associated with the MyFord Touch project. Our billed hours increased 1% and our realized rate per hour increased 6% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the year-ago period.
Service revenue increased $421,000, or 3%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the year-ago period. This increase was primarily the result of $2.4 million in service revenue from MPC and a new major customer in Japan which contributed $1.5 million to revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012, offset by a $2.9 million decline in North America service revenue which was led by a $1.2 million decline in MyFord Touch revenue. Our billed hours increased 4% and our realized rate per hour remained flat for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the year-ago period.
17
Table of Contents
Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft) became our largest engineering services customer during the first quarter of this year, replacing Ford Motor Company (Ford), as Microsoft replaced Ford as the invoiced customer on the MyFord Touch program. We continue to work on the MyFord Touch, a project we began with Ford during the second quarter of 2008, however we now conduct these services through an agreement with Microsoft. During the initial project with Ford, we provided hardware design and implementation, platform level software development, application level software development, quality assurance services and systems integration services. The project has transitioned since the initial project such that we are now primarily focused on developing and integrating new user applications for the MyFord Touch, enhancing existing applications and customizing the MyFord Touch platform for additional vehicle models. Service revenue from the MyFord Touch program declined $690,000 to $1.7 million, or 26% of total service revenue, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $2.4 million, or 38% of total service revenue, in the year-ago period. Service revenue from the MyFord Touch program declined $1.2 million to $3.5 million, or 25% of total service revenue, for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $4.7 million, or 35% of total service revenue, in the year-ago period. The number of engineers working on the MyFord Touch project has declined in the current year under the new agreement with Microsoft.
Gross profit and gross margin
Cost of software revenue consists primarily of the cost of third-party software products payable to third-party vendors and support costs associated with our proprietary software products. Cost of service revenue consists primarily of salaries and benefits, contractor costs and re-billable expenses, related facilities and depreciation costs, and amortization of certain intangible assets related to acquisitions. Gross profit on the sale of third-party software products is also positively affected by rebate credits we receive from Microsoft for the sale of Windows Embedded operating systems earned through the achievement of defined objectives and treated as a reduction in the cost of software revenue. Under this rebate program we earned $184,000 and $413,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $161,000 and $343,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.
Gross profit and related gross margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Three months Ended June 30, |
Six months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Software gross profit |
$ | 3,037 | $ | 3,951 | $ | 6,646 | $ | 7,431 | ||||||||
Software gross margin |
17 | % | 23 | % | 18 | % | 21 | % | ||||||||
Service gross profit |
$ | 1,353 | $ | 1,156 | $ | 2,546 | $ | 2,926 | ||||||||
Service gross margin |
20 | % | 18 | % | 18 | % | 21 | % | ||||||||
Total gross profit |
$ | 4,390 | $ | 5,107 | $ | 9,192 | $ | 10,357 | ||||||||
Total gross margin |
18 | % | 22 | % | 18 | % | 21 | % |
Software gross profit and gross margin
Software gross profit decreased by $914,000, or 23%, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from the year-ago period, while software gross margin declined by six percentage points. These declines were primarily driven by the $935,000 reduction in proprietary software revenue, compared to a relatively fixed cost of sales base. Third-party software gross margin was 15% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 17% in the year-ago period. This decline was primarily due to higher sales of non-Microsoft third-party products in the year-ago period which carry a higher margin. Proprietary software gross margin was 61% in the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 80% in the year-ago period. This decline was due to lower proprietary software revenue compared to a relatively fixed cost base.
Software gross profit decreased by $785,000, or 11%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012, from the year-ago period, while software gross margin declined by three percentage points. The decreases in software gross profit and gross margin were driven by the same factors that accounted for the three-month decline. Third-party software margin was 15% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011. Proprietary software margin was 71% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 81% in the year-ago period. This decline was due to the same factors that accounted for the three-month decline in software gross profit and gross margin.
Service gross profit and gross margin
Service gross profit increased $197,000, or 17%, to $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $1.2 million in the year-ago period, while service gross margin increased by two percentage points to 20% in the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 18% in the year-ago period. The improvements in service gross profit and gross margin were due primarily to a 6% improvement in our realized rate per hour, as well as project overruns in the year-ago period, which did not reoccur in the current year.
18
Table of Contents
These increases were offset in part by higher costs per billable hour in the current year, as we have seen our utilization rate drop six percentage points for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the year-ago period.
Service gross profit decreased $380,000, or 13%, to $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, from $2.9 million in the year-ago period. Service gross margin was 18% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a three percentage point decrease from 21% in the year-ago period. These declines were primarily the result of a three percentage point decline in our utilization rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the year-ago period.
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related benefits, commissions for our sales teams, marketing and administrative personnel and related facilities and depreciation costs, as well as professional services fees (e.g., consulting, legal, tax and audit). Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $556,000, or 14%, to $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $4.1 million in the year-ago period. This decrease was due primarily to a reduction in selling expense of $673,000 due to net reductions in our sales teams both domestically and internationally, coupled with a $137,000 decline in stock compensation expense across all selling, general, and administrative departments. These declines were offset partially by an increase in general and administrative expense associated with our international expansion. Selling, general and administrative expenses represented 15% of our total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 18% in the year-ago period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $348,000, or 4%, to $7.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, from $8.0 million in the year-ago period. This decrease was driven by the same factors that accounted for the three-month decrease. Selling, general and administrative expenses represented 15% of our total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 16% for the year-ago period.
Research and development
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for software development and quality assurance personnel, contractor and consultant costs and related facilities and depreciation costs. Research and development expenses increased $123,000, or 12%, to $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $985,000 in the year-ago period. The increase was driven by development efforts associated with a new initiative with Texas Instruments which is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2012. Research and development expenses represented 4% of our total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 4% in the year-ago period.
Research and development expenses increased $149,000, or 8%, to $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, from $1.9 million in the year-ago period. This increase was driven by the same factor that accounted for the three-month increase. Research and development expenses represented 4% of our total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 4% for the year-ago period.
Other income, net
Other income consists of interest income on our cash, cash equivalents and investments, gains and/or losses recognized on our investments, changes in the estimated fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration, as well as gains or losses on foreign exchange transactions. Other income increased $69,000, or 203%, to $103,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $34,000 in the year-ago period. This increase was primarily the result of a reduction in our estimated earn-out payment associated with our purchase of MPC in the prior year, which resulted in $73,000 of other income.
Other income increased $52,000, or 124%, to $94,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, from $42,000 in the year-ago period. This increase was due primarily to the $73,000 of other income realized during the second quarter for the reduction in the estimated earn-out associated with our purchase of MPC.
Income tax benefit (expense)
Income tax expense increased $8,000 to $35,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $27,000 in the year-ago period primarily related to taxable income generated in the United Kingdom by MPC. Income tax expense decreased $319,000 to a benefit of $63,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to expense of $256,000 in the year-ago period primarily related to U.S. federal and state income taxes incurred as a result of our taxable income during the six months ended June 30, 2011. This is compared to a tax benefit incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2012 for the net loss recognized in the U.S. during the period.
19
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2012, we had $20.8 million of cash, cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments and restricted cash, compared to $19.0 million at December 31, 2011. Of these amounts, $10.5 million and $8.5 million were classified as cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and $875,000 was classified as long-term at both June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Net cash generated by operating activities was $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, driven by a $2.2 million increase in our third-party software fees payable to Microsoft as a result of increased sales of Windows Embedded operating systems during the period. Additionally, non-cash charges increased our net cash generated by operating activities by $1.4 million for the period, which were offset in part by a $1.6 million increase in our accounts receivable. Net cash provided by operating activities was $298,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, driven by our net income during the period and $1.5 million of non-cash charges offset by a $2.0 million decrease in our third-party software fees payable.
Investing activities provided cash of $71,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily due to net maturities of short-term investments of $235,000 offset by $164,000 in equipment purchases. Investing activities used cash of $2.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to net purchases of short-term investments for $2.4 million coupled with $339,000 in equipment purchases.
Financing activities generated $66,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2012, and $209,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011, as a result of employees exercise of stock options.
We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and investments will be sufficient to meet our needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months.
Cash Commitments
We have the following future or potential cash commitments:
| Minimum rents payable under operating leases total $794,000 for the remainder of 2012, $1.4 million in 2013, $1.0 million in 2014, $268,000 in 2015, $268,000 in 2016 and $235,000 thereafter; |
| Under the terms of our corporate headquarters lease signed in February 2004, the landlord has the ability to demand payment for cash payments forgiven in 2004 if we default under the lease. The amount of the forgiven payments for which the landlord can demand repayment was $519,000 at June 30, 2012; and |
| Under the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement for MPC, we will pay an earn-out to the sellers of MPC in the fourth quarter of 2012 if certain revenue milestones are met in certain countries of Europe. We currently estimate this earn-out payment to be $696,000 as of June 30, 2012 based on our probability weighted revenue forecasts. There is no cap on this contingent obligation and this amount is accrued as of June 30, 2012. See Note 4, Acquisition of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 for further discussion of this amount. |
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Not applicable.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
There were no changes to our disclosure controls during the three months ended June 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
20
Table of Contents
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
There has been no material change in the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
21
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BSQUARE CORPORATION | ||||
(Registrant) | ||||
Date: August 9, 2012 |
By: | /s/ BRIAN T. CROWLEY | ||
| ||||
Brian T. Crowley President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: August 9, 2012 |
By: | /s/ SCOTT C. MAHAN | ||
| ||||
Scott C. Mahan Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
22
Table of Contents
BSQUARE CORPORATION
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Filed Here |
Incorporated by Reference | |||||||||||||||||||
with | Form | Filing Date | Exhibit | File No. | ||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation | S-1 | 8/17/1999 | 3.1 | (a) | 333-85351 | ||||||||||||||||
3.1(a) | Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation | 10-Q | 8/7/2000 | 3.1 | 000-27687 | |||||||||||||||||
3.1(b) | Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation | 8-K | 10/11/2005 | 3.1 | 000-27687 | |||||||||||||||||
3.2 | Bylaws and all amendments thereto | 10-K | 3/19/2003 | 3.2 | 000-27687 | |||||||||||||||||
10.12+*** | Microsoft OEM Distribution Agreement for Software Products for Embedded Systems with Microsoft Licensing, GP effective as of July 1, 2012 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.18(b)+ | Statement of Work effective as of July 1, 2012 under the Microsoft Master Vendor Agreement between the Company and Microsoft Corporation dated effective as of June 8, 2008 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.19* | Fourth Amended and Restated Stock Plan | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.19(a)* | Form of Stock Option Agreement | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.19(b)* | Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.19(c)* | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
101.INS** | XBRL Instance Document | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
101.SCH** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
101.CAL** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
101.LAB** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
101.PRE** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase | X |
+ | Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the redacted portions of the referenced exhibit. |
* | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
** | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability. |
*** | Replaces previously filed exhibit |
23