Annual Statements Open main menu

CALIFORNIA FIRST LEASING CORP - Annual Report: 2003 (Form 10-K)


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

   For the fiscal year ended

June 30, 2003    

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

   For the transition period from

______________ to _______________

Commission File number 0-15641

CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California 33-0964185
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

18201 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 800
Irvine, CA

92612

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:

          (949) 255-0500

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

          None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

          Common Stock

        (Title of each class)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes                 X                      No                                    

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.                     _____________________

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes                                          No                 X                 

The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant as of September 19, 2003 was $39,360,541.

Number of shares outstanding as of September 19, 2003: Common Stock 10,934,509

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III incorporates information by reference from Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the close of the Registrant's fiscal year.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

PAGE

Item 1. Business
2-12
Item 2. Properties
12
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
12
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
12
PART II

Item 5. Market for Company's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

13
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
14

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

15-21
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
21
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
22-40

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

40

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
41
Item 11. Executive Compensation
41

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

41
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
41
Item 14. Controls and Procedures
41

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
42

Signatures
Schedule II
Exhibit Index

43
44
45

 

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

       California First National Bancorp, a California corporation (the "Company"), is a bank holding company headquartered in Orange County, California with leasing and bank subsidiaries. Effective May 22, 2001, Amplicon, Inc., ("Amplicon"), reorganized itself as a holding company. In doing so, California First National Bancorp became the holding company and Amplicon became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company became a bank holding company on May 23, 2001 when it acquired all of the outstanding stock of California First National Bank ("CalFirst Bank" or the "Bank"). The Company has two leasing subsidiaries, Amplicon and California First Leasing Corporation ("CalFirst Leasing", collectively the "Leasing Companies"). The operations of CalFirst Leasing commenced July 2, 2001.

      The Leasing Companies focus on leasing and financing capital assets, primarily computers, computer networks and other high technology assets, through a centralized marketing program designed to offer cost-effective leasing alternatives. The Leasing Companies also re-market leased assets at lease expiration. CalFirst Bank, which commenced operations on May 23, 2001, is an FDIC-insured national bank that gathers deposits using the telephone, the Internet, and direct mail from a centralized location. The Bank leases capital assets to organizations and businesses and provides business loans to fund the purchase of assets leased by third parties.

Forward Looking Statements

       This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Factors that might affect forward-looking statements include, among other things:

  • General economic or industry conditions could be less favorable than expected, resulting in a reduced demand for capital assets, deterioration in credit quality, deterioration in the recoverability of our investment in leased property and lease residual values, and a change in the allowance for lease losses;

  • Changes in the domestic interest rate environment could reduce net interest income and negatively effect certain lessees, which could increase lease losses;

  • Over the past two years, the Company's subsidiaries have retained an increasing number of lease transactions in their own portfolios which has increased the Company's exposure to credit risk;

  • CalFirst Bank may not attract or retain sufficient deposits at attractive interest rates to fund its lease portfolio, and therefore could require additional investment by the Company, produce lower lease growth and continuing losses;

  • Security breaches, systems failures, computer viruses or other similar events could damage CalFirst Bank's reputation, or Internet banks in general, and inhibit the ability to raise deposits;

  • The conditions of the securities markets could change, adversely affecting certain leases and the value or credit quality of the Company's assets, or the availability and terms of non-recourse financing obtained to complete certain lease transactions;

  • The Company's Common Stock trades on the NASDAQ National Market System, but the volume of trading has been limited and the low volume of trading limits the liquidity of the Common Stock;

  • Changes in the extensive laws, regulations and policies governing financial services companies could alter the Company's business environment or affect operations;

  • Catastrophic events could impair the Company's business operations or systems, or that of its lessees, resulting in losses;

  • All the above factors could impact the Company's ability to remain in compliance with commitments made to federal bank regulators in connection with the formation of CalFirst Bank.

       The result of these and other factors could cause a difference from expectations of the risk characteristics of the lease portfolio, the level of defaults and a change in the provision for lease losses. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligations to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date on which they are made.

Leasing Companies

       The Leasing Companies lease and re-market most capital assets used by businesses and organizations, with a focus on high technology equipment and software systems. The Leasing Companies' leases are structured individually and can provide end-of-term options to accommodate a variety of objectives. Approximately 59% and 65% of the leases originated in fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively, involved computer workstations and networks, mid-range computers, computer automated design systems and computer software. Other major property groups included manufacturing equipment, furniture and fixtures, telecommunications systems, and point-of-sale systems.

       Computer Systems. The Leasing Companies concentrate on the market for computer servers and networks because this market is particularly receptive to leasing services. Advances in technology, including the rapidly expanding capabilities of personal computer systems and the Internet, have led to continued demand for more powerful systems and communications networks throughout the Leasing Companies' target markets. Computer networks typically consist of a central server, which may be a mid-range computer or high-end microcomputer, multiple personal computers and workstations, network communications hardware and software, printers and associated products. Computer networks generally range in cost from $100,000 to $3,000,000. The Leasing Companies' leased property is used primarily by middle-market companies for centralized data processing, by subsidiaries and divisions of large companies to supplement mainframe computer systems, and by non-profit associations and institutions.

       The Leasing Companies lease computer systems and network products manufactured by Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco"), Dell Computer Corporation ("Dell"), Gateway, Inc. ("Gateway"), Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP"), International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"), and Sun Microsystems, Inc. ("Sun"), among many others.

       Software. The Leasing Companies lease operating system software products and specialized application software packages. These application software packages typically range in cost from $50,000 to $1,000,000. In addition to leasing stand-alone software packages, an increasing percentage of the cost of computer systems and networks consists of operating and application software. The Leasing Companies lease software from vendors such as Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corporation, J.D. Edwards & Company, Jenzabar, Inc., Parametric Technology Corporation, PeopleSoft, Inc., Geac Computer Corporation Limited, MSC.Software Corporation, and SAP AG.

       Other Electronic Equipment. Advances in microcomputer technology have also expanded the scope of other electronic equipment utilized by the Leasing Companies' existing and targeted customer base. Retail point-of-sale systems include those produced by IBM, Knogo Corporation, NCR Corporation ("NCR"), and Fujitsu Limited, while bank automated teller machines also have been procured from NCR. The telecommunications property leased by the Leasing Companies include digital private branch equipment, switching equipment and voice mail systems manufactured by Lucent Technologies Inc., NEC Corporation, Nortel Networks Limited, and Siemens Information and Communications Networks, Inc., as well as satellite tracking systems manufactured by QUALCOMM Incorporated. The Leasing Companies also lease imaging systems, testing equipment, and copying equipment.

       Production Equipment and Other Personal Property. The Leasing Companies lease technology-related manufacturing and distribution management systems that include complex computer controlled manufacturing and production systems, printing presses and warehouse distribution systems. In addition, the Leasing Companies lease a wide variety of personal property in the "non-high technology" area, including machine tools, trucks and office furniture.

       Marketing Strategy

       The Leasing Companies market through a centralized marketing program and direct delivery channels, including the telephone, the Internet, facsimile and express mail. The marketing program includes a confidential database of current and potential users of business property; a training program to introduce new marketing employees to the Leasing Companies' leasing techniques, and an in-house computer and telecommunications system. The Leasing Companies have augmented their marketing programs through the development of interactive web sites that enable prospective customers to review a lease agreement, calculate lease payments and submit a credit application on-line.

       The Leasing Companies implemented their current marketing systems after having determined that a centralized marketing program is more cost effective than field sales representatives. Marketing through the telephone or the Internet, rather than through field sales representatives, has enabled the Leasing Companies to limit selling, general and administrative expenses and allows the Leasing Companies to offer more competitive lease rates to customers.

       The Leasing Companies identify potential customers through a variety of methods. The Leasing Companies purchase lists of target market participants and computer users from private sources, conduct direct mail and telephone campaigns to generate sales leads, and maintain proprietary records of contacts made with potential customers by its sales professionals. The Leasing Companies utilize prospect management software to enhance the productivity of the sales force. Specific information about potential customers is entered into an on-line confidential database accessible to sales professionals and their managers. As potential customers are contacted, the database is updated and supplemented with information about what computer and other property they are using, related lease expiration dates and any future system needs or replacement plans. The database allows sales professionals to efficiently identify the most likely purchaser or lessee of capital assets and to concentrate efforts on these prospective customers.

       The Leasing Companies' databases, combined with the respective prospect management software and an integrated in-house telecommunications system, permit the Leasing Companies' sales management to monitor account executive activity, daily prospect status and pricing information. The ability to monitor account activity and offer immediate assistance in negotiating or pricing a transaction makes it possible for the Leasing Companies to be responsive to their customers and prospects.

       Leasing Activities

       The Leasing Companies' leases are generally for initial terms ranging from two to five years. Substantially all of the Leasing Companies' leases are non-cancelable "net" leases which contain "hell-or-high-water" provisions under which the lessee must make all lease payments regardless of any defects in the property, and which require the lessee to maintain and service the property, insure the property against casualty loss and pay all property, sales and other taxes. The Leasing Companies retain ownership of the property they lease, and in the event of default by the lessee, the Leasing Companies or the lender to whom the lease had been assigned may declare the lessee in default, accelerate all lease payments due under the lease and pursue other available remedies, including repossession of the property. Upon the expiration of the leases, the lessee typically has an option, which is dependent upon each lease's defined end of term options, to either purchase the property at a negotiated price, or in the case of a "conditional sales contract," at a predetermined minimum price, or to renew the lease. If the purchase option is not exercised by the original lessee, once the leased property is returned, the Leasing Companies will endeavor to locate a new lessee; however, if a new lessee cannot be located, then the Leasing Companies will seek to sell the leased property. The terms of the Leasing Companies' software leases are substantially similar to its equipment leases.

       The Leasing Companies conduct their leasing business in a manner designed to minimize risk, however, they are subject to risks through their investment in lease receivables held in their own portfolio, lease transactions in process, and residual investments. The Leasing Companies do not purchase leased property until they have received a binding non-cancelable lease from the customer. A portion of lease originations are discounted to banks or finance companies on a non-recourse basis at fixed interest rates that reflect the customers' financial condition. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, 11% and 32%, respectively, of the total dollar amount of new leases completed by the Leasing Companies were discounted to unaffiliated financial institutions, compared to 36% in fiscal 2001. The institutional lender to which a lease has been assigned has no recourse against the Leasing Companies, unless the Leasing Companies are in default under the terms of the agreement by which the lease was assigned. The institution to which a lease has been assigned may take title to the leased property, but only in the event the lessee fails to make lease payments or otherwise defaults under the terms of the lease. If this occurs, the Leasing Companies may not realize their residual investment in the leased property.

       Lease Portfolio

       Over the past two years, the Leasing Companies have retained an increasing number of lease transactions in their own portfolio that meet credit standards set by their credit committees. Some of these transactions are entered into where the value of the underlying leased property, or the credit profile of the lessee, is not acceptable to other financial institutions. Each of these transactions must meet or exceed certain credit or profitability requirements established, on a case by case basis, by the Leasing Companies' credit committee. In addition, the Leasing Companies invest in lease transactions which the Leasing Companies believe could be placed at a later date with non-recourse lenders on a lease-by-lease basis or in a portfolio. At June 30, 2003 and 2002, the discounted minimum lease payments receivable related to leases retained in the Leasing Companies' portfolio amounted to $88.1 million and $79.7 million, respectively, compared to $93.5 million at June 30, 2001. Such amounts represented 75% and 86% of the Company's total investment in discounted lease payments receivable at June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively and 100% of the Company's total investment at June 30, 2001.

       The Leasing Companies often make payments to purchase leased property prior to the commencement of the lease. The disbursements for such lease transactions in process are generally made to facilitate the property implementation schedule of the lessees. The lessee is contractually obligated to make rental payments directly to the Leasing Companies during the period that the transaction is in process, and generally is obligated to reimburse the Leasing Companies for all disbursements under certain circumstances. At June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Leasing Companies' investment in property acquired for transactions in process amounted to $18.8 million and $17.7 million, respectively, compared to $20.5 million at June 30, 2001. Such amounts represented 93% and 86% of the Company's total investment in transactions in process in at June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and 100% of the Company's total investment at June 30, 2001.

       Credit Risk Management

       The Leasing Companies' strategy for credit risk management includes stringent credit authority centered at the most senior levels of management. The Leasing Companies apply a portfolio management system intended to develop portfolios with different risk/reward profiles. Through the use of non-recourse financing, the Leasing Companies avoid risks that do not meet their risk/reward requirements. The strategy also emphasizes diversification on both a geographic and customer level, and spreading the Leasing Companies' risk across a breadth of leases while minimizing the risk to any one area.

       The management and oversight of the Leasing Companies' portfolios is conducted on a day to day basis by an Asset Management ("AM") group that reports directly to the Chief Financial Officer. The Leasing Companies monitor the performance of all leases held in their own portfolio, transactions in process as well as lease transactions assigned to lenders, if the Leasing Companies retain a residual investment in the leased property subject to the lease. The AM Group conducts an ongoing review of all leases 10 or more days delinquent. The AM Group contacts the lessee directly and generally sends the lessee a notice of non-payment within 15 days after the due date. In the event that payment is not then received, senior management is involved. Delinquent leases are coded in the AM tracking system in order to provide management visibility, periodic reporting, and appropriate reserves. Legal recourse is considered and promptly undertaken if alternative resolutions are not obtained. At 90 days past due, leases generally will be placed on non-accrual status.

       Allowance for Losses on Leases

       The allowance for losses on leases is an estimate of probable and assessable losses in the Leasing Companies' lease portfolios. The allowance recorded is based on a quarterly review of all leases outstanding and transactions in process. The determination of the appropriate amount of any provision is based on management's judgment at that time and takes into consideration all known relevant internal and external factors that may affect the lease portfolio. The primary responsibility for setting reserves resides with the Chief Financial Officer, who reports quarterly to the Company's Audit Committee and Board of Directors regarding overall asset quality, problem leases and the adequacy of valuation allowances.

       The Company individually analyzes the carrying value of each non-performing or problem lease to determine whether the carrying value is less than or equal to the expected recoverability anticipated to be derived from lease payments, additional collateral or residual realization. The amount estimated as unrecoverable is recognized as a reserve specifically identified for the lease. An analysis of the remaining portfolio is conducted and available reserves are compared to the Company's total exposure, recent loss experience and current and anticipated economic conditions in the market. Regardless of the extent of the Company's analysis of customer performance or portfolio evaluation, certain inherent but undetected losses are probable within the lease portfolio. This is due to several factors including inherent delays in obtaining information regarding a lessee's financial condition or change in business conditions; the judgmental nature of individual lease evaluations and the interpretation of economic trends; volatility of economic or customer-specific conditions affecting the identification and estimation of losses and the sensitivity of assumptions utilized to establish allowances for leases, among other factors. Therefore, an estimated inherent loss not based directly on the specific problem assets is recorded as unallocated allowance. The level of such unallocated reserve is determined based on a review of prior years' loss experience, and may vary depending on general market conditions. The aggregate allowance in any one period is apportioned between allowance for doubtful accounts and allowance for valuation of residual value.

Banking Operations

       On May 23, 2001, the operations of CalFirst Bank commenced. The Bank is focused on gathering deposits from depositors nationwide for the primary purpose of funding capital assets that will be leased to small and mid-sized companies, not-for-profit organizations, associations and both private and public educational institutions. The leasing assets will be generated through direct origination of leases by the Bank's own lease organization and through the purchase of lease receivables from other lessors, including the Leasing Companies. Pursuant to the Bank's operating plan approved by regulators, no more than 50% of its lease portfolio will represent purchases of lease receivables from the Leasing Companies.

       The Bank operates in a cost-efficient way similar to the Leasing Companies, intending to be a low cost producer through marketing its products and services directly to end users. The Bank believes that its operating costs generally will be lower than those of traditional "bricks and mortar" banks because it does not have the expense of a traditional branch network to generate deposits and conduct operations.

       Deposit Products

       To date, the Bank has not aggressively sought to attract deposits, given the volume of lease originations and purchases and its available liquidity. Beginning in fiscal 2004, the Bank will more actively seek deposits. The Bank's strategy is to identify depositors through a variety of methods, including the Internet, direct mail, telephone campaigns, purchase of leads from private sources and print advertisements. The Bank offers two types of interest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts and three (3) month to three (3) year certificates of deposit ("CDs") to taxable and IRA depositors. CDs are offered with varying maturities in order to achieve a fair approximation or match of the average life of the Bank's expected lease portfolio. With leases generally providing for fixed rental rates, a matching fixed rate CD book should allow the Bank to minimize interest rate fluctuation risk. It is expected that the Bank generally will offer interest rates on deposit accounts that are higher than the national average.

       To open a new account, a customer can complete an on-line enrollment form on the Bank's Web site, or can call the Bank's toll-free customer service number and open an account telephonically. Signature cards and deposits are then mailed to the Bank. Customers can make deposits by wire transfer, via direct deposit programs, or by mail. No teller line is maintained. The Bank's customers have 24-hour access to account information. Customers can view their banking records and current balances, and transfer funds between accounts through the use of personal computers. They can also pay bills on-line. Each customer automatically receives a free ATM card upon opening an account. In order to obtain cash, the Bank's customers use other banks' automated teller machines that are affiliated with the Plus system. The Bank generally will reimburse customers for some portion of any ATM fees charged by other financial institutions. The Bank believes that any inconvenience resulting from the Bank not maintaining automated teller machines or a local branch office will be offset by the Bank's higher investment yields and lower banking fees.

       Bank Leasing Operations

       The Bank is developing its lease portfolio through direct lease originations meeting the Bank's underwriting standards, and through offering non-recourse lease financing to the Leasing Companies and to non-affiliated leasing companies. The Bank's strategy is to develop a conservative, diversified portfolio of leases with high credit quality lessees. The Bank's loan committee has established underwriting standards and criteria for the lease portfolio and monitors the portfolio on an ongoing basis. The Bank performs an independent credit analysis and due diligence on each lease transaction originated or purchased. The committee applies the same underwriting standards to all leases, regardless of how they are sourced. At June 30, 2003 and 2002, approximately 64% and 58%, respectively, of the Bank's lease portfolio, including transactions in process, represented leases originated directly by the Bank.

       The Bank's lease origination strategy, including marketing, target leased property types and terms are similar to that established in the Leasing Companies. Approximately 88% and 85% of the leases originated in fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively, involved computer workstations and networks, mid-range computers, computer automated design systems and computer software. Unlike the Leasing Companies, however, the Bank does not discount lease receivables related to Bank lease originations to other financial institutions, but will retain all lease receivables in its own portfolio. The Bank owns the underlying assets for these leases, and therefore retains all residual interests related to lease originations.

       Through its lease purchase operations, the Bank purchases lease receivables on a non-recourse basis at fixed interest rates that reflect the proposed lessee's financial condition and current market conditions. The Bank does not assume any obligations as lessor for these transactions, and the original lessor retains ownership of any underlying asset, with the Bank taking a priority first lien position. The Bank verifies the completeness of all lease documentation prior to purchase, to confirm that all documentation is correct and held, that liens have been perfected, and legal documentation has been filed as appropriate.

       The Bank funds internally all Bank originations and lease purchases, and consequently, the Bank retains the credit risk on such leases. The Bank's credit process includes a policy of classifying all leases in accordance with a risk rating classification system approved by its primary regulator, monitoring changes in the risk ratings of leases, identification of problem leases and special procedures for the collection of problem leases. At June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Bank's investment in discounted lease payments receivable amounted to $29.8 million and $13.2 million, or 25% and 14%, respectively, of the Company's total portfolio. As of June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Bank did not have any non-performing leases.

       The Bank has a policy of maintaining an allowance for losses on leases to provide for losses inherent in the lease portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance is evaluated monthly and Bank management reports monthly to the Bank's Board of Directors regarding overall asset quality, the adequacy of valuation allowances and adherence to policies and procedures regarding asset classification and valuation. A key component to the evaluation is the internal lease classification process. The Bank has been in business less than three years and does not have any historical data to use as a basis of comparison. The Bank's classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation allowances are subject to review by regulators who can order the establishment of additional loss allowances.

       The Bank has developed policies and procedures for identifying and qualifying third-party lessors. In sourcing third-party lease originations, the Bank will target those seasoned leasing companies whose principals are determined to be reputable, ethical and experienced with positive leasing operations histories. The Bank's due diligence, including background checks, qualifications verification and credit evaluation of the lessor firm and its principals, is considered to be as important as that conducted for each lessee.

       In addition to leases, the Bank will invest deposit funds in various investment securities. The securities portfolio will be comprised of federal funds sold, high-quality securities including United States agency obligations, mortgage pool securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, investment grade corporate bonds, and United States Treasury securities.

       Bank Operations

       The Bank's operations have been developed by outsourcing certain principal operational functions to leading bank industry service providers and by sharing established systems utilized by the Leasing Companies or the Company. Outsourced systems include the Bank's core processing and electronic banking system, electronic bill payment systems and depositary services, including item processing. The Bank believes it benefits from the service provider's expertise and investments in developing technology. A critical element to the Bank's success is the ability to provide secure transmission of confidential information over the Internet. The Bank's service providers utilize sophisticated technology to provide maximum security. All banking transactions are encrypted and all transactions are routed from the Internet server through a "firewall" that limits access to the Bank's and service provider's systems. Systems are in place to detect attempts by third parties to access other users' accounts and feature a high degree of physical security, secure modem access, service continuity and transaction monitoring.

       The Leasing Companies provide certain services to the Bank pursuant to formal agreements, including servicing the Bank's lease portfolio on the Bank's behalf. The Leasing Companies, as servicer, and the Bank maintain a delinquency reporting and monitoring system to identify potential problems in the lease portfolio early and address them in a timely manner.

Customers

       Leasing customers are primarily middle-market companies, subsidiaries and divisions of Fortune 1000 companies and organizations and institutions located throughout the United States with credit ratings acceptable to the Company's subsidiaries or lenders providing non-recourse loans. The Company does not believe that the loss of any one customer would have a material adverse effect on all of its operations taken as a whole.

       The Bank's deposit customers are expected to be primarily individuals from across the nation who place a substantial portion of their savings in safe, often government-insured, investments. Such individuals are seeking to maximize their interest income and, therefore, are more inclined to move their investments to a bank that offers the highest yield regardless of the geographic location of the depository.

Competition

       The Company competes for the lease financing of capital assets with other independent leasing companies, commercial finance companies, banks and other financial institutions, credit companies affiliated with equipment manufacturers, such as IBM, Dell, and HP, and equipment brokers and dealers. Many of the Company's competitors have substantially greater resources, capital, and more extensive and diversified operations than the Company. The Company believes that the principal competitive factors are price, responsiveness to customer needs, flexibility in structuring lease financing arrangements, financial technical proficiency and the offering of a broad range of lease financing options. The level of competition varies depending upon market and economic conditions, the interest rate environment, and availability of capital. Competition has increased in recent years as developments in the capital markets, and particularly the expansion of the securitization market, has increased access to capital to certain lenders that offer aggressive lease rates. Competition has also been heightened as credit companies affiliated with manufacturers have become more aggressive with respect to the financing terms offered.

       The Bank competes with other banks and financial institutions to attract deposits. As a new entity, the Bank faces competition from established local and regional banks and savings and loan institutions. Many of them have larger customer bases, greater name recognition and brand awareness, greater financial and other resources and longer operating histories. Additionally, new competitors and competitive factors are likely to emerge, particularly in view of the rapid development of Internet banking.

Supervision and Regulation

       The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and is registered with, regulated and examined by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "FRB"). In addition to the regulation of the Company, the Bank is subject to extensive regulation and periodic examination, principally by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC"). The Bank's deposits are insured up to $100,000 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") and the Bank is a member bank within the San Francisco Federal Reserve district.

       The Bank Holding Company Act, the Federal Reserve Act, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Act subject the Company and the Bank to a number of laws and regulations. These laws and regulations impose restrictions on activities, minimum capital requirements, lending and deposit restrictions and numerous other requirements. The federal banking agencies possess broad powers to take corrective action as deemed appropriate for an insured depository institution and its holding company. The OCC, which has primary supervisory authority over the Bank, regularly examines banks in such areas as reserves, loans, investments, management practices, and other aspects of operations. These examinations are designed for the protection of the Bank's depositors rather than the Company's shareholders. The Bank must furnish annual and quarterly reports to the OCC, which has the authority under the Financial Institutions Supervisory Act to prevent a national bank from engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice in conducting its business. Many of these laws and regulations have undergone significant change in recent years. Future changes to these laws and regulations, and other new financial services laws and regulations are likely, and cannot be predicted with certainty.

       Under FRB policy, the Company is expected to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to the Bank and, under appropriate circumstances, to commit resources to support the Bank. Certain loans by the Company to the Bank would be subordinate in right of payment to deposits in, and certain other indebtedness of, the Bank.

       Among the regulations that affect the Company and the Bank are provisions of Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. Section 23A places limits on the amount of loans or extensions of credit the Bank may make to affiliates and the amount of assets purchased from affiliates, except for transactions exempted by the FRB. The aggregate of all of the above transactions is limited in amount, as to any one affiliate, to 10% of a bank's capital and surplus and, as to all affiliates combined, to 20% of a bank's capital and surplus. The Bank and the Company must also comply with certain provisions designed to avoid the Bank buying low-quality assets. The Company and the Bank are also subject to the provisions of Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act which, among other things, prohibits an institution from engaging in transactions with affiliates unless the transactions are on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the institution as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies. All services provided by the Company or its subsidiaries to the Bank are in accordance with this provision.

       In December 2002, the FRB approved Regulation W ("Reg W") which implements, interprets and applies statutory provision in sections 23A and 23B, and became effective April 1, 2003. Under Reg. W, a bank does not have to comply with the quantitative limits of Section 23A when making a loan or extension of credit to an affiliate if 1) the extension of credit was originated by the affiliate; 2) the bank makes an independent evaluation of the creditworthiness of the borrower and commits to purchase the extension of credit before the affiliate makes or commits to make the extension of credit; 3) the bank does not make a blanket advance commitment to purchase loans form the affiliate and 4) the dollar amount of all purchases over any 12 month period by the bank from an affiliate does not represent more than 50% of that affiliate's credit extensions during such period. The Company believes the Bank's purchase of lease receivables from the Leasing Companies conform to the requirements of Reg. W. In addition, the Company has agreed with the FRB that the Bank's purchase of leases from the Leasing Companies will not exceed 50% of the Bank's lease portfolio.

       At the time that Reg. W was published in December 2002, the FRB proposed for public comment an amendment to Reg. W that would limit the amount of extensions of credit that a bank could purchase from an affiliate to 100% of the bank's capital and surplus. If Reg. W is amended in accordance with this proposal, the ability of the Bank to purchase lease receivables from the Leasing Companies would be impacted. The final structure of Reg. W cannot be determined at this time, and there are no assurances that future regulations or interpretations from the FRB will not limit further or prohibit the Bank's purchases of leases from the Leasing Companies.

       In connection with its approval of the Company's purchase of the stock of the Bank, the FRB and the OCC required the Company and the Bank to make certain commitments with respect to the operation of the Bank. These commitments included: (i) the Bank and the Company entering into a binding written agreement setting forth the Company's obligations to provide capital maintenance and liquidity support to the Bank, if and when necessary; (ii) the Bank's Board of Directors executing a binding written agreement with the OCC setting forth certain actions that the Bank would take if the Bank did not achieve certain operating results; (iii) during the first three years of operation, or until the Bank has reported four consecutive quarters of profitability, the Bank must obtain prior approval from the OCC before implementing any significant deviation or change from its original operating plan; (iv) the Company must comply with Reg. W; and (v) the Bank's purchases of leases from affiliates will represent no more than 50% of the Bank's lease portfolio.

       Bank holding companies are subject to risk-based capital guidelines adopted by the FRB. The Company currently is required to maintain (i) Tier 1 capital equal to at least six percent of its risk-weighted assets and (ii) total capital (the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital) equal to ten percent of risk-weighted assets. The FRB also requires the Company to maintain a minimum Tier 1 "leverage ratio" (measuring Tier 1 capital as a percentage of adjusted total assets) of at least five percent. At June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company exceeded all these requirements by a significant amount.

       The Bank is also subject to risk-based and leverage capital requirements mandated by the OCC. In general, banks are required to maintain a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-adjusted assets of 8% and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets of 4%. In addition to the risk-based guidelines, banks are generally required to maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets, referred to as the leverage ratio, of 4%. As a condition of the approval to commence banking operations, for the first three years of the Bank's existence, the Bank is required to maintain a Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets ratio, or leverage ratio, of not less than 8%. At June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Bank had significant capital in excess of all minimum risk-based and leverage capital requirements.

       The principal source of cash flow to the Company, including cash flow to pay dividends on its common shares, is dividends from its subsidiaries and fees for services rendered to its subsidiaries. Various statutory and regulatory provisions limit the amount of dividends or fees that may be paid to the Company by the Bank. The Company does not depend on the Bank for such amounts, and believes the Leasing Companies have sufficient cash flow and assets to meet the Company's requirements.

       On November 12, 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act ("Gramm-Leach") became law. Gramm-Leach significantly changed the regulatory structure and oversight of the financial services industry. Most importantly for the Company and the Bank, Gramm-Leach established new requirements for financial institutions to provide new privacy protections to consumers. In June of 2000, the Federal banking agencies jointly adopted a final regulation providing for the implementation of these protections. It requires a financial institution to provide notice to customers about its privacy policies and practices, describes under what conditions a financial institution may disclose nonpublic personal information about consumers to non-affiliated third parties, and provides an "opt-out" method for consumers to prevent the financial institution from disclosing that information to non-affiliated third parties. Financial institutions were required to be in compliance with the final regulation by July 1, 2001, and the Bank and the Company believe that they were in compliance at such date, and continue to be in compliance.

       On October 26, 2001, the USA Patriot Act became law. The USA Patriot Act requires financial institutions, including the Bank, to help prevent, detect and prosecute international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. With its existing systems and controls required as an Internet bank, the Bank believes it complies with the USA Patriot Act. The Secretary of the Treasury has proposed additional regulations to implement the USA Patriot Act. Although the Company cannot predict when and in what form these regulations will be adopted, the Company believes that the cost of compliance with the USA Patriot Act is not likely to be material to it.

       The commercial banking business is also influenced by the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government and the policies of the FRB. The FRB implements national monetary policies through its management of the discount rate, the money supply, and reserve requirements on bank deposits. Indirectly, such policies and actions may impact the ability of non-bank financial institutions to compete with the Bank. Monetary policies of the FRB have had, and will continue to have, a significant effect on the operating results of financial institutions. The nature and impact of any future changes in monetary or other policies of the FRB cannot be predicted.

       The laws, regulations and policies affecting financial services businesses are continually under review by Congress and state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies. From time to time, legislation is enacted which has the effect of increasing the cost of doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities or affecting the competitive balance between banks and other financial intermediaries. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the operations and taxation of banks, bank holding companies and other financial intermediaries are frequently made in Congress, in the California legislature and before various bank regulatory agencies and other professional agencies. Changes in the laws, regulations or policies that impact the Company cannot necessarily be predicted, and they may have a material effect on the business and earnings of the Company.

Employees

       The Company and its subsidiaries, as of June 30, 2003, had 195 employees, including 139 sales managers and account executives and 18 professionals engaged in finance and credit. None of the Company's employees are represented by a labor union. The Company believes that its relations with its employees are satisfactory.

Available Information

       Our Internet address is www.calfirstbancorp.com. There we make available, free of charge, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our SEC reports can be accessed through the Investor Information section of our Web site. The information found on our Web site is not part of this or any other report we file with or furnish to the SEC.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

       At June 30, 2003, the Company and its subsidiaries occupied approximately 43,000 square feet of office space in Irvine, California leased from an unaffiliated party. The lease provides for monthly rental payments that average $75,060 from July 2003 through August 2009.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

       The Company is sometimes named as a defendant in litigation relating to its business operations. Management does not expect the outcome of any existing suit to have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

       None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

       The common stock of California First National Bancorp trades on the NASDAQ National Market System under the symbol CFNB. The following high and low closing sale prices for the periods shown reflect inter-dealer prices without retail markup, markdown or commissions and may not necessarily reflect actual transactions.

High

Low

Fiscal year ended June 30, 2003

First Quarter

$17.03

$10.96

Second Quarter

14.20

10.45

Third Quarter

12.89

10.11

Fourth Quarter

10.58

8.20

Fiscal year ended June 30, 2002

First Quarter

$12.93

$11.20

Second Quarter

12.50

10.75

Third Quarter

12.25

10.55

Fourth Quarter

16.08

11.20

       The Company had approximately 55 stockholders of record and in excess of 400 beneficial owners as of September 19, 2003.

      The Board of Directors of the Company has adopted a policy of paying a regular quarterly cash dividends, subject to an ongoing review of the Company's profitability, liquidity and future operating cash requirements. For each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company declared cash dividends totaling $.16 per common share. In August 2003, following changes in tax laws and based on the strength on the Company's financial position, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the quarterly dividend on the Company's common stock to $.10 a share from $.04 a share.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

       The following table provides information about the Company's Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options under all of our existing equity compensation plans as of June 30, 2003 .

Plan category
Number of shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options
Number of shares of common stock remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding shares in the first column)
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders
1,021,074
$10.25
504,911 (1)
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders
      None
   N/A
      N/A     
Total
1,021,074
$10.25
504,911 (1)

(1) The maximum number of shares that may be issued under our equity compensation plans increases each year by an amount equal to 1% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of June 30 of the fiscal year immediately preceding such fiscal year.

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

       The following table sets forth selected financial data and operating information of the Company and its subsidiaries. Certain reclassifications have been made to the fiscal years prior to 2002 to conform with this year's financial statement presentation. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and notes thereto and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition contained herein.

INCOME STATEMENT DATA
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,
     (in thousands, except per share amounts)
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
                   
Direct finance income
$ 19,638
 
$ 17,487
$ 16,907
$ 15,407
$ 21,704
Interest income on investments
   1,068
 
   1,551
   3,642
   3,973
   2,003
     Total direct finance and interest income
20,706
 
19,038
20,549
19,380
23,707
Interest expense on deposits
237
 
129
-
-
-
Provision for lease losses
     554
 
   5,354
   1,950
   1,510
   3,076
     Net direct finance and interest income
 
     after provision for lease losses
19,915
 
13,555
18,599
17,870
20,631
 
               
Other income
               
Operating and sales-type lease income
6,384
 
8,822
12,844
15,243
14,850
Gain on sale of leases and leased property
7,926
 
15,122
12,136
15,683
13,512
Other income
     876
 
   1,302
     919
     583
     508
     Total other income
15,186
 
25,246
25,899
31,509
28,870
 
               
     Gross profit
35,101
 
38,801
44,498
49,379
49,501
Selling, general and administrative expenses
17,653
 
14,729
18,723
16,844
17,419
     Earnings before income taxes
17,448
 
24,072
25,775
32,535
32,082
Income taxes
   6,717
 
   9,268
   9,923
 12,526
 12,352
     Net earnings
$ 10,731
 
$ 14,804
$ 15,852
$ 20,009
$ 19,730
 
               
Diluted earnings per share
$0.96
 
$1.29
$1.39
$1.67
$1.60
Diluted common shares outstanding
11,223
 
11,435
11,422
11,942
12,299
 
               
Cash dividends per share
$0.16
 
$0.16
$0.16
$0.16
$0.16
Dividend payout ratio
16.67%
 
12.40%
11.51%
9.58%
10.00%
 
               
Return on average assets
3.72%
 
4.68%
4.32%
4.59%
4.08%
Return on average equity
5.55%
 
8.00%
9.18%
12.53%
13.62%
 
               
BALANCE SHEET DATA
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,
     (in thousands, except per share amounts)
2003
 
2002
2001
2000
1999
 
               
Net investment in capital leases
$131,677
 
$108,091
$116,288
$ 80,645
$ 84,617
Total assets
278,691
 
308,641
336,666
409,857
466,769
 
               
Nonrecourse debt
40,056
 
72,754
121,000
196,778
263,462
Stockholders' equity
$197,277
 
$191,391
$179,253
$167,184
$153,575
 
               
Average equity to average assets ratio
67.11%
 
58.44%
47.03%
36.63%
29.96%
Book value per common share
$18.04
 
$17.12
$15.97
$14.63
$12.98

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General

      The Company's results include the operations of Amplicon, CalFirst Leasing, and CalFirst Bank. The Company's direct finance income includes interest income earned on the Company's investment in lease receivables and residuals. Other income primarily includes gains realized on the sale of leased property, income from sales-type and operating leases and gains realized on the sale of leases, and other fee income. Income from sales-type leases relates to the re-lease of off-lease property ("lease extensions") and new lease transactions that qualify as sales-type leases, generally where the fair value of the property subject to the lease differs from the Company's carrying cost. Income from operating leases generally involves the re-lease of off-lease property that is booked as an operating lease rather than as a sales-type lease.

       The Company's operating results are subject to quarterly and annual fluctuations resulting from a variety of factors, including the volume of new lease originations, the volume and profitability of leased property being re-marketed through re-lease or sale, variations in the mix of lease originations, the size and credit quality of the lease portfolio, interest rates and economic conditions in general. The Company has very little interest bearing liabilities, and therefore, reductions in interest rates in general can reduce the yield earned on the investment in lease receivables and on the investment in securities and other interest earning assets with little offsetting benefit from lower interest expense. CalFirst Bank incurred losses during its first two years of operation ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.

       The Company conducts its business in a manner designed to mitigate risks. However, the assumption of risk is a key source of earnings in the leasing and banking industries and the Company is subject to risks through its investment in lease receivables held in its own portfolio, lease transactions in process, and residual investments. The Company takes steps to manage risks through the implementation of strict credit management processes and on-going risk management review procedures.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

       The preparation of the Company's financial statements requires management to make certain critical accounting estimates that impact the stated amount of assets and liabilities at a financial statement date and the reported amount of income and expenses during a reporting period. These accounting estimates are based on management's judgment and are considered to be critical because of their significance to the financial statements and the possibility that future events may differ from current judgments, or that the use of different assumptions could result in materially different estimates. The following is a description of the most critical accounting policies management applies, all of which require the use of accounting estimates and management's judgment, based on the relevant information available at the end of each period.

       Residual Values -- For capital leases that qualify as direct financing leases, the aggregate lease payments receivable and estimated residual value, if any, are recorded on the balance sheet, net of unearned income, as net investment in capital leases. Of the capital leases booked during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, approximately 47% and 53%, respectively, were structured as "true leases", where the Company owns the leased asset at the end of the term and therefore, the Company recorded a residual value. The residual value is an estimate for accounting purposes of the fair value of the leased property at lease termination and is determined at the inception of the lease based on the property leased and the terms and conditions of the underlying lease contract. The realizability of any estimated residual value depends on future collateral values, contractual options available to the lessee, the credit of the lessee, market conditions and other subjective and qualitative factors. The estimated residual values established at lease inception are periodically reviewed to determine if values are realizable and any identified losses are recognized at such time.

       Allowance for Lease Losses -- The allowance for lease losses provides coverage for probable and estimatable losses in the Company's lease portfolios. The allowance recorded is based on a quarterly review of all leases outstanding and transactions in process. The determination of the appropriate amount of any provision is based on management's judgment at that time and takes into consideration all known relevant internal and external factors that may affect the lease portfolio, including levels of non-performing leases, lessees' financial condition, leased property values as well as general economic conditions and credit quality indicators. The Company's allowance includes an estimate of reserves needed to cover specifically identified lease losses and certain unidentified but inherent risks in the portfolio.

       Income Taxes -- Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences between the time income or expense items are recognized for financial statement purposes and for tax reporting. Such amounts are calculated using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The determination of current and deferred income taxes is based on complex analyses of many factors including interpretation of Federal and state income tax laws, the difference between tax and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities (temporary differences), estimates of amounts due or owed such as the timing of reversals of temporary differences and current financial accounting standards. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates and interpretations used in determining the current and deferred income tax liabilities.

       The Company's estimates are reviewed continuously to ensure reasonableness. However, the amounts the Company may ultimately realize could differ from such estimated amounts.

Consolidated Statement of Earnings Analysis

        Summary -- For fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, net earnings decreased 28% to $10.7 million, compared to $14.8 million for fiscal 2002 and $15.9 million in 2001. Diluted earnings per share decreased 26% to $0.96 for fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, compared to $1.29 per share for fiscal 2002 and $1.39 per share in 2001. The volume of new lease transactions booked during the year ended June 30, 2003 was approximately $118 million, compared to $96 million in fiscal 2002 and $133 million during fiscal 2001. Of the new leases booked during fiscal 2003, approximately 92% were retained in the Company's own portfolios, compared to 71% in the prior year. The higher volume of leases booked in 2003, and the higher percentage retained by the Company, contributed to a 22% increase in the net investment in capital leases from $108.1 million at June 30, 2002 to $131.7 million at June 30, 2003. The resulting increase in direct finance income, and the benefit from a significant reduction in the provision for lease losses, was offset by lower interest rates earned on a continued high level of liquid investments, decreased income from end of term transactions and higher expense levels.

        Net Direct Finance and Interest Income -- Net direct finance and interest income is the difference between interest earned on the investment in capital leases, securities and other interest earning investments and interest paid on deposits or other borrowings. Net direct finance and interest income is affected by changes in the volume and mix of interest earning assets and liabilities, the movement of interest rates, and funding and pricing strategies.

        Net direct finance and interest income was $20.5 million for fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 compared to $18.9 million for fiscal 2002 and $20.5 million in fiscal 2001. The increase in fiscal 2003 was due to an increase of $2.2 million in direct finance income, offset by a decline of $484,000 in interest income on investments and a $108,000 increase in interest expense on deposits. The increase in direct finance income reflects an increase in the average investment in capital leases directly held by the Company, together with a slight increase in yields on such investment. The decrease in interest income on investments resulted from the decline in interest rates earned, as the level of average balances of cash and cash equivalents increased slightly.

        The decrease in net direct finance and interest income in the year ended June 30, 2002 was a due to a decline of $2.1 million in interest income on investments, offset by a $580,000 increase in direct finance income from capital leases. The decrease in interest income on investments resulted from the decline in interest rates earned, which was offset by an increase in the average balances of cash and cash equivalents. The increase in direct finance income reflects an increase in the average investment in capital leases directly held by the Company, which was offset slightly by lower yields on such investment.

The following table presents the components of the increases (decreases) in net direct finance and interest income by volume and rate:

Year Ended June 30,
2003 compared to 2002

2002 compared to 2001

Volume
Rate
Total

Volume

Rate

Total

Direct Finance and Interest income

         

  Net investment in capital leases

$ 1,821,046
$ 330,497
$ 2,151,543

$ 1,343,561

$  (763,633)

$     579,928

  Discounted lease rentals assigned
    to lenders

(3,614,396)
(49,256)
(3,663,652)

(4,403,403)

1,248,280

(3,155,123)

  Federal funds sold

(211,216)
(32,267)
(243,483)

237,449

45,081

282,530

  Interest-bearing deposits with banks

     212,095
(452,403)
  (240,308)

     (89,545)

(2,284,295)

(2,373,840)

    Total finance and interest income

(1,792,471)
(203,429)
(1,995,900)

(2,911,938)

(1,754,567)

(4,666,505)

Interest expense

  Non-recourse debt

(3,614,396)
(49,256)
(3,663,652)

(4,403,403)

1,248,280

(3,155,123)

  Demand and savings deposits

3,547
(304)
3,243

527

964

1,491

  Time deposits

    144,817
   (40,235)
    104,582

     110,141

        17,332

     127,473

    Total interest expense

(3,466,032)
   (89,795)
(3,555,827)

 (4,292,735)

   1,266,576

(3,026,159)

Net direct finance and interest income

$ 1,673,561
$(113,634)
$ 1,559,927

$ 1,380,797

$(3,021,143)

$(1,640,346)

       The following table presents the Company's average balance sheets, direct finance income and interest earned or interest paid, the related yields and rates on major categories of the Company's interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

 
Year ended June 30, 2003
Year ended June 30, 2002
Assets
Average
Balance
Interest Yield/
Rate
 
Average
Balance
Interest
Yield/
Rate
Interest-earning assets              
  Interest-bearing deposits with banks
$  67,665,581
$    938,381
1.4%
$  57,346,572
$  1,178,689
2.1%
  Federal funds sold
6,055,455
129,071
2.1%
13,983,000
372,554
2.7%
  Net investment in capital leases
    including discounted lease rentals (1,2)
177,486,681
24,208,943
13.6%
206,838,701
25,721,052
12.4%
Total interest-earning assets
251,207,717
25,276,395
10.1%
278,168,273
27,272,295
9.8%
Other assets
  36,929,325
  38,283,021
 
$288,137,042
$316,451,294
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity              
Interest-bearing liabilities              
  Demand and savings deposits
$       253,688
4,746
1.9%
$         75,497
1,502
2.0%
  Time deposits
6,924,385
232,131
3.4%
3,242,690
127,550
3.9%
  Non-recourse debt
  52,576,413
4,570,668
8.7%
  93,709,555
8,234,320
8.8%
Total interest bearing liabilities
  59,754,486
4,807,545
8.1%
  97,027,742
8,363,372
8.6%
Other liabilities
35,023,167
34,476,744
Stockholders' equity
193,359,389
184,946,808
 
$288,137,042
$316,451,294
Net direct finance and interest income  
$20,468,850
2.0%
$18,908,923
2.2%
Net direct finance and interest income to  
  average interest-earning assets  
8.1%
6.8%
Average interest-earning assets over  
  average interest bearing liabilities  
420.4%
286.7%

  1. 1. Direct finance income and interest expense on discounted lease rentals and non-recourse debt of $52,576,413 and $93,709,555 at June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, offset each other and do not contribute to the Company's net interest and finance income.
  2. Average balance is based on quarter-end balances, includes non-accrual leases, and is presented net of unearned income.

        Provision for Lease Losses -- The Company's provision for lease losses in fiscal 2003 was $554,000, compared to $5.4 million in fiscal 2002 and $2.0 million in 2001. The $4.8 million decline in fiscal 2003 was due to the fact that the overall level of reserves required in fiscal 2003 remained relatively unchanged. In fiscal 2002, the significant increase in the provision was due in large part to the deterioration in the underlying credit of two large lease transactions. In addition, the increase in 2002 reflects a general increase in the level of delinquencies and charge-offs in the portfolio.

       Other Income -- Other income is a significant source of income for the Company, accounting for 43% of the Company's gross profit during the year ended June 30, 2003, 65% during fiscal 2002 and 58% during 2001. Total other income for the year ended June 30, 2003 decreased by $10.1 million, or 40%, to $15.2 million, compared to $25.2 million in 2002 and $25.9 million in 2001. The decrease in other income during fiscal 2003 is primarily due to a decrease of $7.2 million, or 48%, in gain on sale of leases and leased property and a $2.4 million, or 28%, decrease in operating and sales-type lease income. Both decreases were due to a lower volume of leases reaching their end of term during fiscal 2003 as compared to the prior year.

       During the year ended June 30, 2002, other income decreased by $653,000, or 3%, to $25.2 million, compared to $25.9 million for 2001. The decrease in other income during fiscal 2002 reflects a $4.0 million, or 31%, decrease in operating and sales-type lease income due to a lower volume of lease extensions. The decrease in operating and sales-type lease income was offset by a $3.0 million, or 25%, increase in the gain on sale of leases and leased property which resulted from better realization of values on leased property sold.

        Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses -- The Company's selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") increased $2.9 million, or 20%, to $17.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2003. This compared to SG&A expenses in fiscal 2002 of $14.7 million, which had decreased by $4.0 million, or 21%, from $18.7 million in fiscal 2001. The increase in SG&A expenses during fiscal 2003 is primarily the result of the expansion of the sales organization, which almost doubled its headcount over the year. The decrease in SG&A expenses during fiscal 2002 was the result of steps taken to reduce sales and overhead expenses during a period of economic uncertainty.

        Income Taxes -- Income taxes were accrued at a tax rate of 38.5% for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001, representing the Company's estimated annual tax rates for each respective year.

Financial Condition Analysis

       Lease Portfolio Analysis

       The Company retains leases in its own portfolio that are not assigned to financial institutions. Over the past three fiscal years, the Company has funded a significantly greater percentage of new lease transactions internally. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, approximately 91% of the total dollar amount of new leases booked by the Company were held in its own portfolio, compared to 71% during fiscal 2002 and 64% during 2001. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, the Company's net investment in capital leases increased by $23.6 million. This increase includes a $25.0 million increase in the Company's investment in lease receivables, and a $1.4 million reduction in the investment in estimated residual values. The increase in the investment in capital leases is primarily due to the higher volume of new lease transactions booked and retained by the Company.

      The Company often makes payments to purchase leased property prior to the commencement of the lease. The disbursements for these lease transactions in process are generally made to facilitate the lessees' property implementation schedule. The lessee is contractually obligated by the lease to make rental payments directly to the Company during the period that the transaction is in process, and the lessee is generally obligated to reimburse the Company for all disbursements under certain circumstances. At June 30, 2003, the Company's investment in property acquired for transactions in process was $20.3 million, relatively unchanged from $20.6 million at June 30, 2002, and $20.5 million at June 30, 2001.

       The Company's risk assets are comprised almost exclusively of leases for capital assets to businesses and other commercial or non-profit organizations. All leases are secured by the underlying property being leased. The Company's strategy is to develop lease portfolios with risk/reward profiles that meet its objectives. Through the use of non-recourse financing, the Company avoids risks that do not meet these requirements. The strategy also emphasizes diversification on both a geographic and customer level, and spreading the Company's risk across a breadth of leases while minimizing the risk to any one area. At June 30, 2003, no lessee accounted for more than 5% of the Company's net investment in capital leases, and two lessees each represented approximately 4% of the Company's net investment in capital leases. The investment in capital leases is diversified by geographic regions, with the Company's portfolio spread across all fifty states. At June 30, 2003, California (16%), Florida (15%), and New York (11%) were the only states that represented more than 10% of the Company's net investment in capital leases. The Company has no exposure to foreign lessees. The Company's leases are with lessees in a wide spectrum of industries, however, at June 30, 2003 approximately 25% of the Company's net investment in capital leases was with colleges and universities located throughout the United States. The college and university portfolio includes over 400 leases with over 242 different lessees, and no leases are included among the Company's non-performing leases. One university represented approximately 4% of the Company's net investment in capital leases.

       The Company monitors the performance of all leases held in its own portfolio, transactions in process, as well as lease transactions assigned to lenders, if the Company retains a residual investment in the leased property subject to those leases. An ongoing review of all leases 10 or more days delinquent is conducted. Lessees who are delinquent with the Company or an assignee are coded in the Company's accounting and tracking systems in order to provide management visibility, periodic reporting, and appropriate reserves. The accrual of interest income on leases will generally be discontinued when the lessee becomes 90 days or more past due on its lease payments with the Company, unless the Company believes the investment is otherwise recoverable. Leases may be placed on non-accrual earlier if the Company has significant doubt about the ability of the lessee to meet its lease obligations, as evidenced by consistent delinquency, deterioration in the lessee's financial condition or other relevant factors.

        The following table summarizes the Company's non-performing capital leases:

            At June 30,

Non-Performing Capital Leases

2003

2002

Non-accrual leases

$ 3,978,564

$ 1,295,594

Restructured leases

1,122,293

90,150

Leases past due 90 days (other than above)

                 -

    278,172

    Total non-performing capital leases

$ 5,100,857

$ 1,663,916

Non-performing assets as % of

    total investment in capital leases

3.3%

1.3%

 

       Direct finance income that would have been recorded had non-performing leases at each respective fiscal year end been current in accordance with their original terms would have been $325,338 and $45,238 during fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, respectively. The amount of direct finance income actually recorded on non-performing capital leases was $322,614 and $112,977 during fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively.

       In addition to the non-performing capital leases identified above, there were $2.8 million of investment in capital leases at June 30, 2003 for which management has concerns regarding the ability of the lessees to continue to meet existing lease obligations, compared with $6.8 million at June 30, 2002. This amount consists of leases classified as substandard or doubtful, or with lessees that currently are experiencing financial difficulties or that management believes may experience financial difficulties in the future.

       Allowance for Lease Losses

       The allowance for lease losses provides coverage for probable and estimatable losses in the Company's lease portfolios. The allowance recorded is based on a quarterly review of all leases outstanding and transactions in process. Lease receivables or residuals are charged off when they are deemed completely uncollectible. The determination of the appropriate amount of any provision is based on management's judgment at that time and takes into consideration all known relevant internal and external factors that may affect the lease portfolio.

 

(dollars in thousands)

Years Ended June 30,

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Net Investment in capital leases at year end

$ 131,677
 

$ 108,091

$ 116,288

$   80,645

$   84,617

 

Allowance for lease losses at beginning of year

$     5,502
 

$     3,401

$     4,340

$     5,474

$     2,969

    Charge-off of lease receivables

(2,215)
 

(3,440)

(2,889)

(2,644)

(571)

    Recovery of amounts previously written off

450
 

187

-

-

-

    Provision for lease losses

         554
 

      5,354

      1,950

      1,510

      3,076

Allowance for lease losses at end of year

$     4,291
 

$     5,502

$     3,401

$     4,340

$     5,474

Allowance for lease losses as percent of
    net investment in capital leases

3.2%
 

5.1%

2.9%

5.4%

6.5%

 

       The allowance for lease losses decreased to $4.3 million (3.2% of net investment in capital leases) at June 30, 2003 from $5.5 million (5.1% of net investment in capital leases) at June 30, 2002. The allowance at June 30, 2003 consisted of $2.5 million allocated to specific accounts and $1.8 million that was unallocated. This compared to $3.7 million allocated to specific accounts at June 30, 2002 and $1.8 million that was unallocated at such date. The decrease in the 2003 allowance relates to a reduction in specific non-performing or problem leases, and the write-off of non-performing leases. The Company considers the allowance for doubtful accounts of $4.3 million at June 30, 2003 adequate to cover losses specifically identified as well as inherent in the lease portfolios. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will not, in any particular period, sustain lease losses that are sizeable in relation to the amount reserved, or that subsequent evaluations of the lease portfolio, in light of factors then prevailing, including economic conditions and the on-going credit review process, will not require significant increases in the allowance for lease losses. Among other factors, a continued economic slowdown may have an adverse impact on the adequacy of the allowance for lease losses by increasing credit risk and the risk of potential loss even further. As the Company has retained a significantly greater percentage of leases in its own portfolio, this creates increased exposure to delinquencies, repossessions, foreclosures and losses than the Company has historically experienced.

       Liquidity and Capital Resources

       The Company funds its operating activities through internally generated funds, non-recourse debt and bank deposits. The Leasing Companies' capital expenditures for leased property purchases are sometimes financed by assigning certain base lease term payments to banks or other financial institutions, including CalFirst Bank. The assigned lease payments are discounted at fixed rates such that the lease payments are sufficient to fully amortize the aggregate outstanding debt. At June 30, 2003, the Company had outstanding non-recourse debt aggregating $40.1 million relating to property under capital leases. In the past, the Company has been able to obtain adequate non-recourse funding commitments, and the Company believes it will be able to do so in the future.

       Deposits have not been an important source of funds for the Company. Deposits totaled $7.6 million at June 30, 2003, compared to $9.0 at June 30, 2002. The following table presents average balances and average rates paid on deposits for years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:

Years ended June 30,

2003

2002

Average

Average

Average

Average

Balance

Rate Paid

Balance

Rate Paid

Non-interest bearing demand deposits

$ 1,011,622

n/a

$  528,003

n/a

Interest-bearing demand deposits

21,182

0.50%

13,723

0.50%

Savings deposits

232,506

2.00%

61,774

2.32%

Time deposits less than $100,000

4,268,305

3.31%

2,269,989

3.86%

Time deposits, $100,000 or more

$ 2,656,080

3.42%

$  972,701

4.11%

 

       In April 2001, the Board of Directors authorized management, at its discretion, to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock. During the year ended June 30, 2003, the Company repurchased 268,900 shares at an aggregate cost of $3.3 million. As of September 20, 2003, 612,956 shares remain available under this authorization.

       At June 30, 2003, the Company's cash and cash equivalents were $67.3 million. The need for cash for operating activities will increase as the Company expands. The Company believes that existing cash balances, cash flow from operations, cash flows from its financing and investing activities, and assignments (on a non-recourse basis) of lease payments will be sufficient to meet its foreseeable financing needs.

       Stockholders' equity at June 30, 2003 was $197.3 million, or 71% of total assets, compared to $191.4 million, or 62% of total assets, at June 30, 2002. At June 30, 2003, the Company and the Bank exceed their regulatory capital requirements and are considered "well-capitalized" under guidelines established by the FRB and the OCC.

       Inflation has not had a significant impact upon the operations of the Company.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

       The Company's exposure to market risk related to interest rate risk is currently not material because it does not have any interest bearing recourse debt and at June 30, 2003, the Bank's deposits were not material. Non-recourse debt does not represent an interest rate risk to the Company because it is fully amortized through direct payments from lessees to the purchaser of the lease receivable. The Company's cash and due from banks is invested in securities of very short duration, and therefore, any immediate 10% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the fair market value of the portfolio. The Company is exposed to some interest rate risk, because as interest rates decrease, interest income on its cash will decrease, and future lease rates from direct financing leases, which often are based on United States Treasury rates, may be lower. Conversely, as interest rates rise, the Company's earnings will benefit as yields on cash investments and lease investments improve. The only other interest rate risk the Company currently faces relates to the Bank's investment in federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell. This investment matures in less than ninety days and therefore, the fair value approximates the carrying value. The interest rate on this investment was 1.28% at June 30, 2003. As the banking operations of the Company grow, and the Bank is more active in raising deposits, the Company will be subject to increased interest rate risk. The Bank has an Asset/Liability Management Committee and policies established for managing its interest rate risk.

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The following financial statements and supplementary financial information are included herein at the pages indicated below:

Page Number

Report of Independent Auditors

23
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2003 and 2002 24
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended
   June 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001
25
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the
   years ended June 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001
26

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years
   ended June 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001

27

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

28-40
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule for the years
   ended June 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
44

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of California First National Bancorp

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of California First National Bancorp and subsidiaries, at June 30, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the consolidated financial statement schedules listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Los Angeles, California
July 31, 2003

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

                         June 30,

ASSETS

2003

2002

       

Cash and due from banks

$  61,284,987

 

$  78,502,896

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under
   agreements to resell

     6,055,000

    9, 890,000

     Total cash and cash equivalents (Note 1)

67,339,987

 

88,392,896

Security held to maturity (Note 1)

552,750

 

583,150

Net receivables (Note 2)

16,683,172

 

15,960,664

Property acquired for transactions in process (Note 1)

20,286,788

 

20,569,682

Net investment in capital leases (Note 3)

131,677,158

 

108,091,366

Property on operating leases, less accumulated depreciation of    $150,443 (2003) and $95,881 (2002)
83,251
5,592

Income taxes receivable (Note 4)

-

 

1,141,622

Other assets

2,012,126

 

1,142,006

Discounted lease rentals assigned to lenders (Note 3)

    40,055,682

    72,753,929

 

$ 278,690,914

$ 308,640,907

       

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

     

Liabilities:

     

   Accounts payable

$     1,597,848

 

$     1,422,031

   Accrued liabilities

3,310,785

 

3,995,836

   Demand deposits

1,166,982

 

1,332,967

   Time certificates of deposit

6,427,232

 

7,636,176

   Customer deposits

6,470,172

 

7,607,573

   Non-recourse debt (Note 3)

40,055,682

 

72,753,929

   Deferred income taxes -- including income taxes
     payable, net (Note 4)

    22,385,318

    22,501,549

 

    81,414,019

  117,250,061

       

Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)

     
       

Stockholders' equity (Note 1):

     

   Preferred stock; 2,500,000 shares
     authorized; none issued

-

 

-

   Common stock; $.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares
     authorized; 10,933,509 (2003) and 11,179,728 (2002)
     issued and outstanding

 

109,335

 

 

111,797

Additional paid in capital

1,448,572

 

2,900,270

Retained earnings

  195,718,988

  188,378,779

 

  197,276,895

  191,390,846

 

$ 278,690,914

$ 308,640,907

 

The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

 
       Years ended June 30,
 
2003
 

2002

2001

 
       

Direct finance income

$19,638,275
 

$17,486,732

 

$16,906,804

Interest income on investments

   1,067,452
 

    1,551,243

    3,642,553

   Total direct finance and interest income

20,705,727
 

19,037,975

 

20,549,357

           

Interest expense on deposits

236,877
 

129,052

 

88

Provision for lease losses

      554,000
 

    5,354,000

    1,950,000

   Net direct finance and interest income after
     provision for lease losses

 19,914,850
 

  13,554,923

  18,599,269

Other income

       

   Operating and sales-type lease income

6,383,683
 

8,821,948

 

12,843,872

   Gain on sale of leases and leased property

7,926,475
 

15,122,533

 

12,135,721

   Other income

      875,837
 

    1,301,535

       919,591

     Total other income

 15,185,995
 

  25,246,016

  25,899,184

 
       

Gross profit

35,100,845
 

38,800,939

 

44,498,453

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 17,652,896
 

  14,729,202

 

  18,723,263

Earnings before income taxes

17,447,949
 

24,071,737

 

25,775,190

Income taxes

   6,717,000
 

    9,268,000

 

    9,923,000

Net earnings

$10,730,949
 

$14,803,737

 

$15,852,190

 
       

Basic earnings per common share

$ 0.97
 

$ 1.32

 

$ 1.40

Diluted earnings per common share

$ 0.96
 

$ 1.29

$ 1.39

 
 

Dividends declared per common share outstanding

$   .16
 

$   .16

$   .16

 
 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

11,034,594
 

11,204,491

11,283,718

Diluted common shares outstanding

11,223,181
 

11,434,950

11,422,154

 

The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Additional

       Common Stock     

paid in    

Retained

Shares

Amount

Capital    

Earnings

Total

Balance, June 30, 2000

11,430,718

$114,307

$4,264,541

$162,804,922

$167,183,770

  Shares issued -

     Stock options exercised

49,110

491

345,790

-

346,281

  Shares repurchased

(252,500)

(2,525)

(1,545,300)

(780,057)

(2,327,882)

  Dividends declared

-

-

-

(1,801,372)

(1,801,372)

  Net earnings

                  -

               -

                  -

  15,852,190

  15,852,190

Balance, June 30, 2001

11,227,328

112,273

3,065,031

176,075,683

179,252,987

  Shares issued -                
     Stock options exercised
79,900
799
615,539
-
616,338
  Shares repurchased
(127,500)
(1,275)
(780,300)
(707,485)
(1,489,060)
  Dividends declared
-
-
-
(1,793,156)
(1,793,156)
  Net earnings
                -
             -
                -
   14,803,737
   14,803,737
Balance, June 30, 2002
11,179,728
111,797
2,900,270
188,378,779
191,390,846
  Shares issued -                
     Stock options exercised
22,681
227
193,970
-
194,197
  Shares repurchased
(268,900)
(2,689)
(1,645,668)
(1,628,106)
(3,276,463)
  Dividends declared
-
-
-
(1,762,634)
(1,762,634)
  Net earnings
                -
              -
                -
   10,730,949
   10,730,949
Balance, June 30, 2003
10,933,509
$109,335
$1,448,572
$195,718,988
$197,276,895

 

The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  Years ended June 30,

2003
2002
2001
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net earnings
$10,730,949
$14,803,737
$15,852,190
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash flows used
     for operating activities:
     Depreciation
169,080
127,976
4,496
     Sale of leased property previously on operating leases, net
29,841
3,400
577
     Interest accretion of estimated residual values
(1,996,182
)
(2,691,548
)
(4,126,939
)
     Decrease in estimated residual values
6,330,529
12,732,340
17,330,959
     Provision for lease losses
554,000
5,354,000
1,950,000
     Net (decrease) increase in income taxes payable, including
       deferred taxes
(116,231
) 945,972   (8,715,354 )
     Net (increase) decrease in net receivables
(722,508
)
(6,655,218
)
2,991,620
 
     Decrease (increase) in income taxes receivable
1,141,622
7,056,099
(8,197,721
)
     Net decrease (increase) in property acquired for
       transactions in process
282,894
(2,929,687 ) 5,419,142  
     Net decrease in accounts payable and
       accrued liabilities
(509,234
) (1,160,421 ) (701,025 )
     Decrease in customer lease deposits
(1,137,401
) (601,396 ) (136,164 )



Net cash provided by operating activities
14,757,359
26,985,254
21,671,781



CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
     Net increase in minimum lease payments receivable
(25,517,971
)
(1,289,215
)
(46,904,229
)
     Sales (purchases) of security held to maturity, net
30,400
16,850
(600,000
)
     Purchase of equipment on operating leases
(276,580
)
(133,568
)
(6,496
)
     Net (increase) decrease in other assets
(870,120
)
200,997
 
(106,210
)
     Estimated residual values recorded on leases
(2,956,168
) (2,709,031 ) (3,793,101 )



Net cash used for investing activities
(29,590,439
) (3,913,967 ) (51,410,036 )



CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
     Net (decrease) increase in time deposits
(1,208,944
)
7,595,331
 
40,845
     Net (decrease) increase in demand and money market deposits
(165,985
)
1,303,612
 
29,355
     Payments to repurchase common stock
(3,276,463
)
(1,489,060
)
(2,327,882
)
     Dividends to stockholders
(1,762,634
)
(1,793,156
)
(1,801,372
)
     Proceeds from exercise of stock options
194,197
616,338
346,281



Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities
(6,219,829
)
6,233,065
 
(3,712,773
)



NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(21,052,909
)
29,304,352
 
(33,451,028
)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
88,392,896
59,088,544
92,539,572



CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
$67,339,987
$88,392,896
$59,088,544



SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
     Decrease in lease rentals assigned to lenders and
          related non-recourse debt
($32,698,247
) ($48,245,759 ) ($75,778,148 )



SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
     Cash paid during the year for:
       Interest
$      60,923
$       57,060
$       24,562



       Income taxes
$ 5,645,009
$  1,265,929
$26,836,075



The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Nature of Operations

Effective May 22, 2001, Amplicon, Inc. ("Amplicon") reorganized itself as a holding company and Amplicon became a wholly-owned subsidiary of California First National Bancorp, a California corporation (the "Company"). California First National Bancorp and its subsidiaries have two principal lines of business, leasing and banking. The Company leases high-technology and other capital assets to customers located throughout the United States. The Company is also engaged in the re-marketing of leased assets at lease expiration. The Company's banking subsidiary, California First National Bank ("CalFirst Bank"), which commenced operations on May 23, 2001, is an FDIC-insured national bank that gathers deposits using the telephone, the Internet, and direct mail from a centralized location and leases capital assets to businesses and organizations and provides business loans to fund the purchase of assets leased by third parties.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of California First National Bancorp and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Amplicon, California First Leasing Corporation ("CalFirst Leasing"), and CalFirst Bank. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of these statements, cash and cash equivalents includes cash in banks, cash in demand deposit accounts, money market accounts and federal funds sold, all of which have initial maturities of less than ninety days. Included in cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2003 was $6,055,000 that was held by the Bank and was not available to fund the Company's other operations.

Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell

The Company enters into purchases of securities under agreements to resell substantially identical securities. These agreements are classified as secured loans. Securities purchased under agreements to resell at June 30, 2003 consist of U.S. Treasury securities.

The amounts advanced under these agreements are reflected as assets in the consolidated balance sheet. It is the Company's policy to not take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. Agreements with third parties specify the Company's rights to request additional collateral, based on its monitoring of the fair value of the underlying securities on a daily basis. At June 30, 2003 and 2002, these agreements matured within 90 days and no material amount of agreements to resell securities purchased was outstanding with any individual dealer.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company has estimated the fair value of its financial instruments in compliance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments" ("SFAS No. 107"). For cash, accounts receivable and deposits, the book value is a reasonable estimate of fair value. For cash equivalents, the estimated fair value is based on respective market prices which was equal to book value for all periods presented. The fair value of the Company's net investment in capital leases is not a required disclosure under SFAS No. 107.

Security Held to Maturity

The Company has an investment security at fiscal years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 which has been classified as held to maturity under the criteria established with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities".

Leases

     Capital Leases

New lease transactions are generally structured as direct financing leases or sales-type leases. The re-lease of property that has come off lease may be accounted for as a sales-type lease or as an operating lease, depending on the terms of the re-lease. Leased property that comes off lease and is re-marketed through a sale to the lessee or a third party is accounted for as sale of leased property.

For capital leases that qualify as direct financing leases, the aggregate lease payments receivable and estimated residual value, if any, are recorded on the balance sheet net of unearned income as net investment in capital leases. The unearned income is recognized as direct finance income over the lease term on an internal rate of return method. There are no costs or expenses related to direct financing leases since lease income is recorded on a net basis.

For capital leases that qualify as sales-type leases, the Company recognizes profit or loss at lease inception to the extent the fair value of the property leased differs from the Company's carrying value. The difference between discounted value of the aggregate lease payments receivable and the property cost, less the discounted value of the residual, if any, and any initial direct costs is recorded as sales-type lease income. For balance sheet purposes, the aggregate lease payments receivable, and estimated residual value, if any, are recorded on the balance sheet net of unearned income as net investment in capital leases. Unearned income is recognized as direct finance income over the lease term on an internal rate of return method.

The residual value is an estimate for accounting purposes of the fair value of the lease property at lease termination. The estimates are reviewed continuously to ensure reasonableness, however the amounts the Company may ultimately realize could differ from the estimated amounts.

The Company assigns, on a non-recourse basis, the minimum lease payments receivable related to certain leases to financial institutions at fixed interest rates. When leases are assigned to unaffiliated financial institutions without recourse, the discounted value of the minimum lease payments receivable is recategorized on the balance sheet as discounted lease rentals assigned to lenders. The related obligations resulting from the discounting of the leases are recorded as non-recourse debt. The unearned income related to the lease is reduced by the interest expense from the non-recourse debt. In the event of default by a lessee, the lender has a first lien against the underlying leased property with no further recourse against the Company. If this occurs, the Company may not realize its residual investment in the leased property.

A portion of the Company's selling, general and administrative costs directly related to originating direct financing lease transactions is deferred as an increase to direct finance income and amortized over the lease term as a reduction to direct finance income utilizing the effective interest method.

     Operating Leases

Lease contracts which do not meet the criteria of capital leases are accounted for as operating leases. Property on operating leases is recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lease term to the estimated residual value at the termination of the lease. Most operating leases involve the re-lease of off-lease property and the associated cost is the Company's previously booked residual. Rental income is recorded monthly or quarterly when due. Selling costs directly associated with operating leases are deferred and amortized over the lease term.

Reserve for Lease Losses

The reserve for doubtful accounts and residual valuation allowance ("reserve") is periodically reviewed for adequacy considering levels of past due leases and non-performing assets, lessees' financial condition, leased property values as well as general economic conditions and credit quality indicators. The need for reserves is subject to future events, which by their nature are uncertain. Therefore, changes in economic conditions or other events affecting specific lessees or industries may necessitate additions or deductions to the reserve for doubtful accounts or the residual valuation allowance.

Property Acquired for Transactions in Process

Property acquired for transactions in process primarily represents partial deliveries of property which the lessee has accepted on in-process lease transactions. Such amounts are stated at cost.

Earnings Per Share

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share includes the effect of the potential shares outstanding, including dilutive stock options, using the treasury stock method. The following table reconciles the components of the basic net income per share calculation to diluted net income per share.

 

          Years ended June 30,

2003

2002

2001

Net earnings

$10,730,949

$14,803,737

$15,852,190

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
     assuming no exercise of outstanding options

11,034,594

11,204,491

11,283,718

Dilutive stock options using the treasury stock method

     188,587

     230,459

     138,436

Dilutive common shares outstanding

11,223,181

11,434,950

11,422,154

Basic earnings per common share

$0.97

$1.32

$1.40

Diluted earnings per common share

$0.96

$1.29

$1.39

 

Capital Structure

At June 30, 2003, the Company had two stock option plans that are more fully described below. The Company accounts for these Plans under APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stocks Issued to Employees," under which no compensation cost has been recognized. In accordance with Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123"), as amended by SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure," (SFAS No. 148), the Company adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148.

At June 30, 2003, the Company has 20,000,000 authorized shares of Common Stock and is authorized to issue 2,500,000 shares of preferred stock, from time to time, in one or more series and to fix the voting powers, designations, preferences and the relative participating, optional or other rights, if any, of any wholly unissued series of preferred stock.

In August 1985, the Company's stockholders approved a Stock Option Plan (the "1985 Plan"). Stock options that were granted entitled the recipient to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at prices greater than, equal to or less than the estimated fair market value at the date of the grant. Under the 1985 Plan, stock options become exercisable over a three or five year period, commencing with the first anniversary of the date of the grant, and expire ten years from the date of the grant. The Company had reserved 1,300,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 1985 Plan. No further grants will be made under the 1985 Plan.

In November 1995, the Company's stockholders approved the 1995 Equity Participation Plan (the "1995 Plan") which succeeds the 1985 Plan. The 1995 Plan provides for the granting of options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights ("SARs") to key employees, directors and consultants of the Company. Under the 1995 Plan, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options or SARs, or upon the vesting of restricted stock awards, is 1,000,000. The maximum number of available shares of Common Stock will increase by an amount equal to 1% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of June 30 of the fiscal year immediately preceding such fiscal year. Each grant or issuance under the 1995 Plan will be set forth in a separate agreement and will indicate, as determined by the stock option committee, the type, terms, vesting period and conditions of the award.

The following table summarizes the activity in the 1985 Plan and 1995 Plan (the "Plans") for the periods indicated:

As of June 30,
2003
   
2002
2001

Shares

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Shares

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 

Shares

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Options outstanding at
   the beginning of the year

1,034,874

$10.08

 

1,254,440

$ 9.72

 

1,118,000

$ 8.66

 
 
 
 

Granted

59,000

14.00

 

17,500

11.54

 

642,000

8.61

Exercised

(  22,681)

8.56

 

(  79,900)

7.71

 

(  49,110)

7.05

Canceled/expired

(  50,119)

11.91

 

(157,166)

8.53

 

(456,450)

5.85

 
 
 
 

Options outstanding at
   the end of the year

1,021,074

$ 10.25

 

1,034,874

$10.08

 

1,254,440

$ 9.72

                 

Shares available for
   issuance

504,911

452,114

357,341

                 

Options exercisable

617,791

520,707

493,790

 

Weighted average fair
   value of options granted

$ 6.71

$ 5.66

$ 4.02

 

 

    As of June 30, 2003
    Options outstanding Options exercisable
 

Range of
Exercise prices

Number
Outstanding

Weighted
Average remaining
Contractual life
(in years)

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Number
Exercisable

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

  $  6.00 - $ 7.875

   154,700

5.77

$ 6.66

121,367

$ 6.85

 

  8.125 - 10.50

   518,724

5.77

   9.32

274,224

   9.38

 

11.375 - 17.75

   347,650

5.96

 13.25

222,200

 13.24

 

$  6.00 - $17.75

1,021,074

5.84

$10.25

617,791

$10.27

 

The Company accounts for these Plans under APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stocks Issued to Employees," under which no compensation cost has been recognized. Had compensation cost for these plans been determined consistent with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (SFAS No. 123), as amended by SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure an Amendment to FASB No 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (SFAS No. 148), the Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the following proforma amounts:

 
Years ended June 30,
 
2003
2002
2001

Net earnings

$10,730,949

$14,803,737

$15,852,190

Proforma compensation cost

(     464,879)

(    483,875)

(    502,158)

Proforma net earnings

$10,266,070

$14,319,862

$15,350,032

       

Proforma Basic EPS

$           0.93

$           1.28

$           1.36

       

Proforma Diluted EPS

$           0.91

$           1.25

$           1.34

 

Since the SFAS No. 123 method of accounting, as amended by SFAS No. 148, has not been applied to options granted prior to July 1, 1995, the resulting proforma compensation cost may not be indicative of that to be expected in future periods.

The fair value of each grant is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2003, 2002 and 2001.

 
                    Years ended June 30,
 
2003
2002

2001

Risk free interest rate

2.46%

4.09%

4.97%

Option life (in years)

5

5

5

Dividend yield

1.40%

1.30%

1.60%

Volatility

60.46%

58.76%

57.88%

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions" (SFAS 147). SFAS 147 removes acquisition of financial institutions from the scope of both SFAS No. 72, "Accounting for Certain Acquisitions of Banking and Thrift Institutions," and FASB Interpretation No. 9, "Applying APB Opinion No. 16 and 17 When a Savings and Loan Association or Similar Institution Is Acquired in a Business Combination Accounted for by the Purchase Method" and requires those transactions be accounted for in accordance with SFAS Statements No. 141, "Business Combinations" and No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." In addition, SFAS 147 amends SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" to include in its scope long-term customer-relationship intangible assets of financial institutions. The Company anticipates the adoption of SFAS147 will not have an impact on the financial statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities - an Interpretation of ARB No. 51" (FIN 46). A Variable Interest Entity ("VIE") is created when: (i) the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity from financing its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or (ii) equity holders either (a) lack direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity, (b) are not obligated to absorb expected losses of the entity or (c) do not have the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur. If an entity is deemed to be a VIE, pursuant to FIN 46, an enterprise that absorbs a majority of the expected losses or residual returns of the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. It is not expected that FIN 46 will have an impact on the Company.

In April 2003, FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 149). SFAS 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This Statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, except as stated specifically in the statement and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. In addition, except as stated specifically in the Statement, all provisions of this Statement should be applied prospectively. SFAS 149 is not expected to have an impact on the Company.

In May 2003, FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity" (SFAS 150). SFAS 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability. The Company anticipates the adoption of SFAS 150 will not have an impact on the financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the fiscal 2001 and 2002 financial statements to conform to the presentation of the fiscal 2003 financial statements.

Note 2 - Receivables:

The Company's net receivables consist of the following:

 

          June 30,

2003

2002

Lessees

$15,620,727

$12,908,501

Financial institutions

1,310,290

3,206,802

Other

     156,752

    287,975

17,087,769

16,403,278

Less allowance for doubtful accounts

    (404,597)

   (442,614)

Net receivables

$16,683,172

$15,960,664

 

Note 3 - Capital Leases:

The Company's net investment in capital leases consists of the following:

 

          June 30,

2003

2002

Minimum lease payments receivable, less allowance for
     doubtful accounts of $3,011,028 in 2003 and $3,699,653
     in 2002

$132,220,337

$106,900,267

Estimated residual value, less valuation
     allowance of $797,115 in 2003 and $1,280,702 in 2002

   16,715,122

   18,721,840

148,935,459

125,622,107

Less unearned income

(17,258,301)

(17,530,741)

Net investment in capital leases

$131,677,158

$108,091,366

The minimum lease payments receivable and estimated residual value are discounted using the internal rate of return method related to each specific capital lease. Unearned income includes the offset of initial direct costs of $4,787,247 and $4,680,098 at June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

At June 30, 2003, a summary of the installments due on minimum lease payments receivable and the expected maturity of the Company's estimated residual value, net of allowances, is as follows:

Years ending
June 30,

Minimum      
Lease Payments
Receivable     

Estimated    
Residual Value

Total

2004

$  75,202,025

$  7,690,832

$  82,892,857

2005

39,818,770

4,211,311

44,030,081

2006

12,489,783

4,428,379

16,918,162

2007

3,541,760

297,715

3,839,475

2008

1,018,461

86,885

1,105,346

Thereafter

       149,538

                  -

       149,538

132,220,337

16,715,122

148,935,459

Less unearned income

(14,325,866)

(2,932,435)

(17,258,301)

Net investment in capital leases

$117,894,471

$13,782,687

$131,677,158

 

Non-recourse debt, which relates to the discounting of capital lease receivables, bears interest at rates ranging from 4.26% to 10.50%. Maturities of such obligations at June 30, 2003 are as follows:

Years ending
    June 30,

Capital
Leases

      2004

$23,050,505

      2005

11,644,222

      2006

2,588,508

      2007

201,087

      2008

        38,665

Total non-recourse debt

37,522,987

Deferred interest expense

   2,532,695

Discounted lease rentals assigned to lenders

$40,055,682

 

Deferred interest expense of $2,532,695 at June 30, 2003 will be amortized against direct finance income related to the Company's discounted lease rentals assigned to lenders of $40,055,682 using the effective yield method over the applicable lease term.

Note 4 - Income Taxes:

The Company accounts for its income taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." Among other provisions, this standard requires deferred tax balances to be determined using the enacted income tax rate for the years in which taxes will be paid or refunds received. From time to time, the Company is audited by various governmental taxing authorities. The Company believes that its accrual for income taxes is adequate for adjustments, if any, which may result from these examinations.

The provision for income taxes is summarized as follows:

   
Years ended June 30,
 

2003

2002

2001

Current tax expense:

Federal

$4,748,229

$5,343,516

$ 8,378,941

State

  2,452,150

  2,561,867

  2,598,814

  7,200,379

  7,905,383

10,977,755

Deferred tax expense (benefit):

Federal

(1,092,397

)

2,796,111

 

(805,058

)

State

    609,018

 

 (1,433,494

)

   (249,697

)

   (483,379

)

  1,362,617

 

 (1,054,755

)

$6,717,000

$9,268,000

$ 9,923,000

Deferred taxes result principally from the method of recording lease income on capital leases and depreciation methods for tax reporting, which differ from financial statement reporting.

Deferred income tax liabilities (assets) are comprised of the following:

     

               June 30,

 

2003

2002

Deferred income tax liabilities:

   Tax operating leases

$22,434,221

$23,146,754

   Deferred selling expenses

  1,962,771

  1,918,840

Total liabilities

24,396,992

25,065,594

Deferred income tax assets:

   Allowances and reserves

(734,270

)

(1,123,044

)

   Depreciation other than on operating leases

(419,151

)

(544,348

)

   State income taxes

    (858,253

)

    (896,653

)

Total assets

 (2,011,674

)

 (2,564,045

)

Net deferred income tax liabilities

$22,385,318

$22,501,549

At June 30, 2003 and 2002 the Company had an income taxes receivable balance of zero and $1,141,622, respectively.

The sources of differences between the federal statutory income tax rate and the Company's effective tax rate are as follows:

     

Years ended June 30,

2003

2002

2001

Federal statutory rate

35.0%

35.0%

35.0%

State tax, net of federal benefit

4.7    

4.7    

4.6    

Other

(1.2)  

(1.2)  

(1.1)  

Effective rate

38.5%

38.5%

38.5%

 

Note 5 - Regulatory Capital Requirements:

The Company and CalFirst Bank are subject to regulatory capital adequacy guidelines administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in the initiation of certain actions by the federal agencies that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. The Company currently is required to maintain (i) Tier 1 capital equal to at least six percent (6%) of its risk-weighted assets; (ii) total capital (the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital) equal to ten percent (10%) of risk-weighted assets; and (iii) a minimum Tier 1 "leverage ratio" (measuring Tier 1 capital as a percentage of adjusted total assets) of at least five percent (5%). CalFirst Bank is subject to risk-based and leverage capital requirements mandated by the Office of Comptroller of the Currency. The Bank is required to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets of four percent (4%); (ii) a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-adjusted assets of eight percent (8%) and (iii) for the first three years of operations, a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets, leverage ratio, of 5%.

The following table presents capital and capital ratio information for the Company and its banking subsidiary as of June 30, 2003 and 2002. At June 30, 2003, the Company and CalFirst Bank exceeded all capital requirements by a significant amount.

   
Years ended June 30,
   
2003
2002

California First National Bancorp

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Tier 1 risk-based capital

$ 197,277,000

105.7%

$ 191,391,000

115.2%

Total risk-based capital

$ 199,633,000

107.0%

$ 193,510,000

116.5%

Tier 1 Leverage capital

$ 238,361,000

82.8%

$ 230,774,000

82.9%

California First National Bank

Tier 1 risk-based capital

$  18,422,000

51.2%

$  18,658,000

96.0%

Total risk-based capital

$  18,873,000

52.4%

$  18,901,000

97.2%

Tier 1 Leverage Capital

$  41,762,000

44.1%

$  27,069,000

68.9%

Note 6 - Commitments and Contingencies:

Leases

The Company leases its corporate offices under an operating lease that expires in fiscal 2009. Rent expense was $1,084,209 (2003), $946,151, (2002) and $929,131 (2001). Future remaining lease payments on this lease are $4,653,709.

Years ending
June 30,

Future minimum
Lease payments
2004
$   882,600     
2005
882,600     
2006
882,600     
2007
882,600     
2008
962,836     
Thereafter
    160,473     
$4,653,709     

Litigation

The Company is party to various legal actions and administrative proceedings and subject to various claims arising out of the Company's normal business activities. Management does not expect the outcome of any of these matters, individually and in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

401(k) Plan

Employees of the Company may participate in a voluntary defined contribution plan (the "401K Plan") qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Under the 401K Plan, employees who have met certain age and service requirements may contribute up to a certain percentage of their compensation. The Company has made contributions during the years ended June 30, 2003, 2002, and 2001 of $143,789, $140,846 and $68,928, respectively.

Note 7 - Segment Reporting:

The Company has two leasing subsidiaries, Amplicon and CalFirst Leasing ("Leasing Companies"), involved in leasing and financing capital assets, primarily computers, computer networks and other high technology assets. The Leasing Companies also re-market leased assets at lease expiration.

The Company's banking subsidiary, CalFirst Bank, is an FDIC-insured national bank that gathers deposits from a centralized location and leases capital assets to businesses and organizations and provides business loans to fund the purchase of assets leased by third parties.

The accounting policies of each segment are the same as those described in "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (see Note 1)." Below is a summary of each segment's financial results for 2003 and 2002:

Leasing
Companies

CalFirst Bank

Other

Consolidated

Year end June 30, 2003

Net direct finance and interest income
   after provision for lease losses

$  17,285,287

$  2,614,858

$         14,705

$  19,914,850

Other income

    15,087,885

         98,110

                     -

    15,185,995

Gross profit

$  32,373,172

$  2,712,968

$         14,705

$  35,100,845

Net earnings (loss)

$  12,030,528

$  (236,145)

$  (1,063,434)

$  10,730,949

Total assets

$302,455,033

$42,189,659

$(65,953,778)

$278,690,914

Year End June 30, 2002

Net direct finance and interest income
   after provision for lease losses

$  12,656,348

  $     894,511

  $           4,064

  $ 13,554,923

Other income

    25,214,500

         31,516

                    -

     25,246,016

Gross profit

$  37,870,848

$     926,027

$           4,064

$ 38,800,939

Net earnings (loss)

$  16,910,858

$(1,511,918)

$     (595,203)

$ 14,803,737

Total assets

$302,874,601

$28,324,821

$(22,558,515)

$308,640,907

 

Note 8 - California First National Bancorp (Parent Only) Financial Information:

The condensed financial statements of California First National Bancorp as of June 30, 2003, and 2002 and for each of the years in the period ended June 30, 2003 are presented below:

  Condensed Balance Sheets  

          June 30,

(in thousands)

2003

2002

Assets

   Cash and cash equivalents

$        751

$     1,633

   Intercompany receivables

226

124

   Investments in bank subsidiary

18,422

18,658

   Investments in non-bank subsidiaries

188,325

191,294

   Intercompany note receivable
10,072
-

   Other assets

2,444

1,902

   Premises and other fixed assets

          404

            17

$ 220,644

$ 213,628

Liabilities

   Accrued liabilities

$        833

$        783

   Payable to non-bank subsidiaries

103

100

   Loan from non-bank subsidiaries

    22,431

    21,354

    23,367

    22,237

Stockholders' Equity

   Preferred stock; 2,500,000 shares
     authorized, none issued

-

-

   Common stock, $0.01 par value;
     20,000,000 shares authorized;
     10,933,509 (2003) and 11,179,728
     (2002) issued and outstanding

109

112

   Additional paid-in capital

1,600

3,051

   Retained earnings

 195,568

 188,228

 197,277

 191,391

$ 220,644

$ 213,628

 

 
Condensed Statements of Earnings
 

          June 30,

(in thousands)

2003

2002

Income

   Dividends from non-bank subsidiary

$20,000

  $21,278

   Management fee income bank subsidiary

130

110

   Management fee income non-bank subsidiaries

1,280

1,758

   Other interest income

        15

           4

 21,425

  23,150

Expenses

   Selling, general and administrative

2,147

2,313

   Interest expense

   1,202

   1,473

   3,349

   3,786

Income before taxes and equity in over distributed
   earnings of subsidiaries

18,076

19,364

Income tax credits

 

     860

   1,319

18,936

20,683

Equity in over distributed earnings of subsidiaries

 (8,205)

  (5,879)

$10,731

$14,804

 

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

 

          June 30,

(in thousands)

2003

2002

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net earnings

$ 10,731

$ 14,804

   Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash flows used for:

     Provision for deferred income taxes

(860)

(1,319)

     Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

8,205

5,879

     Net change in other liabilities

50

332

     Net change in other assets

318

(583)

     Other, net

    (387)

       (17)

Net cash provided by operating activities

  18,057

   19,096

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

   Payments for investments in and advances to subsidiaries

(15,174)

(16,408)

Net cash used for investing activities

(15,174)

(16,408)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

   Proceeds from advances in subsidiaries

1,080

1,238

   Proceeds from issuance of common stock

194

691

   Payments to repurchase common stock

(3,276)

(1,565)

   Dividends paid

  (1,763)

  (1,792)

Net cash used for financing activities

  (3,765)

  (1,428)

NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

(882)

1,260

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

    1,633

       373

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

$      751

$   1,633

 

Note 10 - Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited):

Summarized quarterly financial data for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:

Three months ended

September 30,

December 31,

March 31,

June 30,

(In thousands except per share amounts)

2003

Net direct finance and interest income
   after provision for lease losses

$ 4,646

$ 5,147

$ 5,120

$ 5,002

Gross profit

8,802

9,012

8,358

8,928

Net earnings

$ 3,039

$ 2,895

$ 2,287

$ 2,510

Basic earnings per common share

$   0.27

$   0.26

$   0.21

$   0.23

Diluted earnings per common share

$   0.27

$   0.26

$   0.21

$   0.22

Dividends declared per common share

$   0.04

$   0.04

$   0.04

$   0.04

 

Three months ended

September 30,

December 31,

March 31,

June 30,

(in thousands except per share amounts)

2002

Net direct finance and interest income
   after provision for lease losses

$ 3,316

$ 3,840

$ 3,139

$ 3,260

Gross profit

8,623

9,477

9,945

10,756

Net earnings

$ 2,988

$ 3,593

$ 3,852

$ 4,371

Basic earnings per common share

$   0.27

$   0.32

$   0.34

$   0.39

Diluted earnings per common share

$   0.26

$   0.32

$   0.34

$   0.37

Dividends declared per common share

$   0.04

$   0.04

$   0.04

$   0.04

 

 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

 

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than October 28, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than October 28, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than October 28, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than October 28, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, based on their evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are adequate and effective for the purposes set forth in the definition in Exchange Act rules. There were no significant changes made during the most recent fiscal quarter to the Company's internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)         List of documents filed as part of this Report

             (1)  Financial Statements
                   All financial statements of the Registrant as set forth under Part II
                   Item 8 of this report on Form 10-K

             (2)  Financial Statement Schedules:

             Schedule Number           Description

Page Number

                       II. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts          44

All other schedules are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because all material information required to be reported is included in the financial statements and notes thereto.

             (3)  Exhibits:

                   See Index to Exhibits filed as part of this Form 10-K            45

                         

(b)          Reports on Form 8-K

There was one report filed on Form 8-K filed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. The report filed on April 23, 2003 was regarding the Company's press release on the financial results for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2003 and certain other information.

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP

By: S. Leslie Jewett/s/
Date: September 26, 2003
  S. Leslie Jewett
 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes each of Patrick E. Paddon, S. Leslie Jewett and Glen T. Tsuma as attorney-in-fact to sign on his behalf, individually in each capacity stated below, and to file all amendments and/or supplements to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature
Title
        Date
     
Patrick E. Paddon/s/
Patrick E. Paddon
President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director
September 26, 2003
   
Glen T. Tsuma/s/
Glen T. Tsuma
Vice President, Chief Operating
Officer and Director
September 26, 2003
   
S. Leslie Jewett/s/
S. Leslie Jewett
Chief Financial Officer September 26, 2003
   
Michael H. Lowry/s/
Michael H. Lowry
Director September 26, 2003
   
Harris Ravine/s/
Harris Ravine
Director September 26, 2003
   
Danilo Cacciamatta/s/
Danilo Cacciamatta
Director September 26, 2003

 

SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

 

Balance
beginning
of period

Additions
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses

Accounts
written off

Balance
at end
of period

Year ended June 30, 2001:

Allowance for doubtful accounts

$2,944,793

$1,550,000

$(2,115,210)

$2,379,583

Allowance for valuation of
   residual value

$1,395,329

$   400,000

$   (774,061)

$1,021,268

Year ended June 30, 2002:

Allowance for doubtful accounts

$2,379,583

$5,054,000

$(3,212,927)

$4,220,656

Allowance for valuation of
   residual value

$1,021,268

$   300,000

$     (40,566)

$1,280,702

Year ended June 30, 2003:
Allowance for doubtful accounts
$4,220,656
$  554,000
$(1,280,641)
$3,494,015
Allowance for valuation of
   residual value
$1,280,702
$              -
$   (483,587)
$   797,115

Note: The allowance for doubtful accounts includes balances related to receivables, capital leases and operating leases described in Notes 1, 2 and 3 of the Notes to Financial Statements.

 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.                                      Description of Exhibit

Page No.

     

2.1

Agreement of Merger dated as of May 22, 2001 among
     Amplicon, Inc., California First National Bancorp and
     CFNB Merger Sub (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1
     to Registrant's Statement on Form 8-K dated May 25, 2001)
 

3.1

Articles of Incorporation of California First National Bancorp
     (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's
     Statement on Form 8-K dated May 25, 2001)

 

3.2

Bylaws of California First National Bancorp (incorporated by reference
     to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Statement on Form 8-K
     dated May 25, 2001)

 
10.1

1984 Stock Option Plan, as amended to date
     (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
     Registrant's Statement on Form S-8 File No. 33-27283)

 
10.2

1995 Equity Participation Plan, as amended to date
     (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
     Registrant's Statement on Form S-8 File No. 333-15683)

 

10.3

Business Loan Agreement dated as of December 23, 1997 between
     Amplicon, Inc. and Bank of America (incorporated by
     reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant's
     December 31, 1997 Form 10-Q)

 
10.4

Office Lease dated September 17, 1997, between Amplicon, Inc. and
     GT Partners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20
     to the Registrant's March 31, 1998 Form 10-Q)

 

10.5

Amendment One to Business Loan Agreement, dated as of December
     20, 1999, between Amplicon, Inc. and Bank of America
     (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21
     to the Registrant's December 31, 1999 Form 10-Q)

 
10.6

Capital Assurances and Liquidity Maintenance Agreement between
     California First National Bancorp and California First National
     Bank, effective as of May 23, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
     Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Statement on Form 8-K dated May 25, 2001)

 

10.7

Agreement by and between California First National Bank and the
     Office of the Comptroller of the Currency dated as of
     May 23, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
     to Registrant's Statement on Form 8-K dated May 25, 2001)

 
10.8
Office Lease dated January 30, 2003, between California First National Bancorp
     and World Trade Center Building, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8
     to the Registrant's March 31, 2003 Form 10-Q)
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Executive Officer 46
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Financial Officer 47
32
Section 1350 Certifications by Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer 48