Annual Statements Open main menu

Carter Bankshares, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2021 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2021
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to     
Commission File Number: 001-39731
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia
85-3365661
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1300 Kings Mountain Road
MartinsvilleVirginia24112
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (276) 656-1776
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $1 par value
CARE
Nasdaq Global Select Market
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232-405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of August 1, 2021 there were 26,466,748 shares of the registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding.
1

Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS


2

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
PART 1
ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands Except per Share Data)June 30, 2021 (unaudited)December 31, 2020 (audited)
ASSETS
Cash and Due From Banks$41,850 $38,535 
Interest-Bearing Deposits in Other Financial Institutions72,538 39,954 
Federal Reserve Bank Excess Reserves102,263 163,453 
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents216,651 241,942 
Securities Available-for-Sale, at Fair Value843,538 778,679 
Loans Held-for-Sale9,311 25,437 
Loans Held-for-Sale in Connection with Sale of Bank Branches, at the lower of cost or fair value— 9,835 
Portfolio Loans2,916,654 2,947,170 
Allowance for Credit Losses(109,319)(54,074)
Portfolio Loans, net2,807,335 2,893,096 
Bank Premises and Equipment, net73,301 85,307 
Bank Premises and Equipment, Held-for-Sale, net— 2,293 
Other Real Estate Owned, net21,250 15,722 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, at Cost3,215 5,093 
Bank Owned Life Insurance54,679 53,997 
Other Assets91,233 67,778 
Total Assets$4,120,513 $4,179,179 
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Noninterest-Bearing Demand$720,231 $699,229 
Interest-Bearing Demand414,677 366,201 
Money Market405,962 294,229 
Savings661,303 625,482 
Certificates of Deposit1,457,168 1,614,770 
Deposits Held-for-Assumption in Connection with Sale of Bank Branches— 84,717 
Total Deposits3,659,341 3,684,628 
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings30,000 35,000 
Other Liabilities32,064 19,377 
Total Liabilities3,721,405 3,739,005 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common Stock, Par Value $1.00 per share,
Authorized 100,000,000 Shares
Outstanding 26,466,748 at June 30, 2021 and 26,385,041 at December 31, 2020
26,467 26,385 
Additional Paid-in Capital143,874 143,457 
Retained Earnings218,692 254,611 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income10,075 15,721 
Total Shareholders’ Equity399,108 440,174 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity$4,120,513 $4,179,179 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
PART 1
ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in Thousands Except per Share Data)Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
2021202020212020
INTEREST INCOME
Loans, including fees
Taxable$28,417 $29,577 $56,562 $60,374 
Non-Taxable1,237 2,024 2,649 4,126 
Investment Securities
Taxable3,138 3,594 6,125 8,096 
Non-Taxable215 329 541 490 
FRB Excess Reserves33 26 59 162 
Interest on Bank Deposits23 — 47 74 
Dividend Income31 67 68 131 
Total Interest Income33,094 35,617 66,051 73,453 
Interest Expense
Interest Expense on Deposits5,760 9,237 12,055 19,732 
Interest Expense on Federal Funds Purchased— — — 
Interest on Other Borrowings131 118 264 194 
Total Interest Expense5,891 9,355 12,319 19,927 
NET INTEREST INCOME27,203 26,262 53,732 53,526 
Provision for Credit Losses967 5,473 2,824 10,271 
Provision for Unfunded Commitments(603)— (885)— 
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses26,839 20,789 51,793 43,255 
NONINTEREST INCOME
Gain on Sales of Securities, net1,499 2,321 5,109 3,535 
Service Charges, Commissions and Fees1,489 190 3,298 1,840 
Debit Card Interchange Fees1,874 1,468 3,705 2,711 
Insurance Commissions378 332 672 1,641 
Bank Owned Life Insurance Income342 350 682 703 
Gains on Sales of Other Real Estate Owned, net— 137 — — 
Other Real Estate Owned Income82 75 221 
Commercial Loan Swap Fee Income742 1,125 961 1,548 
Other910 196 1,688 817 
Total Noninterest Income7,238 6,201 16,190 13,016 
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and Employee Benefits13,686 12,489 26,268 26,070 
Occupancy Expense, net3,451 3,415 6,965 6,664 
FDIC Insurance Expense657 537 1,300 1,081 
Other Taxes718 788 1,480 1,534 
Advertising Expense220 394 390 1,006 
Telephone Expense588 573 1,188 1,147 
Professional and Legal Fees1,440 1,399 2,664 1,836 
Data Processing954 595 1,875 1,081 
Losses on Sales and Write-downs of Other Real Estate Owned, net2,603 — 2,815 52 
Losses on Sales and Write-downs on Bank Premises, net64 59 107 71 
Debit Card Expense713 671 1,345 1,225 
Tax Credit Amortization427 272 854 544 
Unfunded Loan Commitment Expense — (383)— 599 
Other Real Estate Owned Expense142 177 196 317 
Other2,096 2,037 3,917 4,407 
Total Noninterest Expense27,759 23,023 51,364 47,634 
Income Before Income Taxes6,318 3,967 16,619 8,637 
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)886 (488)1,812 (241)
Net Income$5,432 $4,455 $14,807 $8,878 
Earnings per Common Share
Basic Earnings per Common Share$0.21 $0.17 $0.56 $0.34 
Diluted Earnings per Common Share$0.21 $0.17 $0.56 $0.34 
Average Shares Outstanding – Basic & Diluted26,344,104 26,296,429 26,314,943 26,285,275 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
PART 1
ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)2021202020212020
Net Income$5,432 $4,455 $14,807 $8,878 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Securities Available-for-Sale:
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Arising during the Period8,456 14,422 (2,038)16,426 
Reclassification Adjustment for Gains included in Net Income(1,499)(2,321)(5,109)(3,535)
Tax Effect(1,461)(2,541)1,501 (2,707)
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 5,496 9,560 (5,646)10,184 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 5,496 9,560 (5,646)10,184 
Comprehensive Income $10,928 $14,015 $9,161 $19,062 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
PART 1
ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)
Common Stock
Additional Paid-in Capital
Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance at March 31, 2021$26,468 $143,582 $213,260 $4,579 $387,889 
Net Income5,432 5,432 
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax5,4965,496
Recognition of Restricted Stock Compensation Expense291291
Forfeitures of Restricted Stock (783 shares)
(1)1
Balance at June 30, 2021$26,467$143,874$218,692$10,075$399,108
Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Common StockAdditional Paid-in CapitalRetained EarningsAccumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeTotal Shareholders’ Equity
Balance March 31, 2020$26,386 $142,792 $304,892 $751 $474,821 
Net Income4,455 4,455 
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax9,560 9,560 
Recognition of Restricted Stock Compensation Expense223223
Forfeitures of Restricted Stock (384 shares)
(1)1
Balance at June 30, 2020$26,385$143,016$309,347$10,311$489,059

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)
Common Stock
Additional Paid-in Capital
Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2020$26,385 $143,457 $254,611 $15,721 $440,174 
Net Income14,807 14,807 
Cumulative Effect for Adoption of Credit Losses(50,726)(50,726)
Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax(5,646)(5,646)
Recognition of Restricted Stock Compensation Expense499499
Forfeitures of Restricted Stock (783 shares)
(1)1
Issuance of Restricted Stock (82,490 shares)
83(83)
Balance at June 30, 2021$26,467$143,874$218,692$10,075$399,108

Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Common StockAdditional Paid-in CapitalRetained EarningsAccumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeTotal Shareholders’ Equity
Balance December 31, 2019$26,334 $142,492 $304,158 $127 $473,111 
Net Income8,878 8,878 
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax10,184 10,184 
Dividends Declared ($0.14 per share)
(3,689)(3,689)
Recognition of Restricted Stock Compensation Expense575575
Forfeitures of Restricted Stock (2,484 shares)
(3)3
Issuance of Restricted Stock (53,056 shares)
54(54)
Balance at June 30, 2020$26,385$143,016$309,347$10,311$489,059
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
PART 1
ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)20212020
Net Income$14,807 $8,878 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Provision for Credit Losses1,939 10,271 
Origination of Loans Held-for-Sale(414,780)(266,307)
Proceeds From Loans Held-for-Sale431,090 276,740 
Depreciation/Amortization of Bank Premises and Equipment3,113 3,016 
Provision (Benefit) for Deferred Taxes1,999 (1,159)
Net Amortization of Securities1,879 1,724 
Tax Credit Amortization854 544 
Gains on Sales of Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale(184)(64)
Gains on Sales of Securities, net(5,109)(3,535)
Write-downs of Other Real Estate Owned3,211 70 
Gains on Sales of Other Real Estate Owned, Net(396)(18)
Losses on Sales and Write-downs of Bank Premises107 71 
Premiums on Branch Sales(506)— 
Increase in the Value of Life Insurance Contracts(682)(703)
Recognition of Restricted Stock Compensation Expense499 575 
Increase in Other Assets(8,957)(20,138)
Decrease in Other Liabilities(5,447)(1,010)
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities23,437 8,955 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Securities Available-for-Sale:
Proceeds from Sales108,300 96,669 
Proceeds from Maturities, Redemptions, and Pay-downs52,183 43,534 
Purchases(215,175)(128,688)
Purchase of Bank Premises and Equipment, Net(3,248)(6,873)
Net Cash Paid in Branch Sales(73,923)— 
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock— (1,062)
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock1,878 82 
Loan Originations and Payments, net28,891 (74,912)
Payments Received on Other Real Estate Owned230 245 
Other Real Estate Owned Improvements— (19)
Proceeds from Sales and Payments of Other Real Estate Owned3,440 1,742 
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities(97,424)(69,282)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net Change in Demand, Money Markets and Savings Accounts217,745 237,083 
Decrease in Certificates of Deposits(164,049)(134,621)
(Payments) Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings(5,000)25,000 
Cash Dividends Paid— (3,689)
Net Cash (Used In) Provided by Financing Activities48,696 123,773 
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents(25,291)63,446 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period241,942 125,812 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$216,651 $189,258 
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Cash Interest Paid$12,759 $20,272 
Cash Paid for Income Taxes820 240 
Transfer from Loans to Other Real Estate Owned— 707 
Transfer from Fixed Assets to Other Real Estate Owned12,013 235 
Security (Purchases) Settled in Subsequent Period(14,084)(3,225)
Right-of-use Asset Recorded in Exchange for Lease Liabilities$2,027 $— 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Principles of Consolidation: The interim Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Carter Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including Carter Bank & Trust (the “Bank”). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Basis of Presentation: The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), on March 12, 2021. In management’s opinion, the accompanying interim financial information reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our financial position and the results of operations for each of the interim periods presented. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative to the results of operations that may be expected for a full year or any future period.
Reorganization: The Company was incorporated on October 7, 2020, by and at the direction of the board of directors of the Bank, for the sole purpose of acquiring the Bank and serving as the Bank’s parent bank holding company pursuant to a corporate reorganization transaction (the “Reorganization”). The Reorganization was completed on November 20, 2020 pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization among the Bank, the Company and CBT Merger Sub, Inc., and the Bank survived the Reorganization as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In the Reorganization, each of the outstanding shares of the Bank’s common stock was converted into and exchanged for one newly issued share of the Company’s common stock.
Reclassification: Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. Reclassifications had no material effect on prior year net income or shareholders’ equity.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Those estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the disclosures provided. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Information available which could affect these judgments include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, changes in the performance of the economy, including COVID-19 related changes, and changes in the financial condition of borrowers.
The CARES Act: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) was enacted on March 27, 2020. The CARES Act provided approximately $2.2 trillion in emergency economic relief measures including, among other things, loan programs for small and mid-sized businesses and other economic relief for impacted businesses and industries, including financial institutions. Many of the CARES Act’s programs depend upon the direct involvement of U.S. financial institutions and have been implemented through rules and guidance adopted by federal departments and agencies, including the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”) and other federal bank regulatory authorities, including those with direct supervisory jurisdiction over the Company and the Bank.
Set forth below is a brief overview of certain provisions of the CARES Act and certain other regulations and supervisory guidance related to the COVID-19 pandemic that are applicable to the operations and activities of the Company and the Bank. The following description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the CARES Act and the statutes, regulations, and policies described herein. Such statutes, regulations, and policies are subject to ongoing review by U.S. Congress and federal regulatory authorities. Future amendments to the provisions of the CARES Act or changes to any of the statutes, regulations, or regulatory policies applicable to the Company or the Bank could have a material effect on the Company and the Bank. Many of the requirements called for in the CARES Act and related regulations and supervisory guidance continue to be implemented and most are subject to implementing regulations, many of which continue to be refined by federal banking agencies. The Company and the Bank continue to assess the impact of the CARES Act and other statutes, regulations and supervisory guidance related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
8

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION – (continued)
Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”)
PPP is a program administered as part of the Small Business Administration’s (“SBA”) 7-A loan program. The PPP is a guaranteed, unsecured loan program created to fund certain payroll and operating costs of eligible businesses, organizations and self-employed persons during the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, $349 billion was approved and designated for the PPP in order for the SBA to guarantee 100% of collective loans made under the program to eligible small businesses, nonprofits, veteran’s organizations, and tribal businesses. The Bank became an approved SBA 7-A lender in the second quarter of 2020. We participated in the initial round of funding through a referral relationship with a third-party, non-bank lender. When an additional $310 billion in funds were approved and designated for the PPP in April 2020, the Bank opted to set up an internal, automated loan process utilizing its core system provider.
Congress enacted the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (the “CAA”) on December 27, 2020, which amended the CARES Act and included (i) the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Non-profits, and Venues Act, (ii) the COVID-Related Tax Relief Act of 2020, and (iii) the Taxpayer Certainty and Disability Relief Act of 2020. These laws include significant clarifications and modifications to the PPP, which had terminated on August 8, 2020. In particular, Congress revived PPP and allocated an additional $284 billion in the PPP funds for 2021. As a participating PPP lender, the Bank continues to monitor legislative, regulatory, and supervisory developments related thereto.
Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) and Loan Modifications for Affected Borrowers
The CARES Act permits banks to suspend requirements under GAAP for certain loan modifications to borrowers affected by COVID-19 that would otherwise be characterized as TDRs and suspend any determination related thereto if (i) the loan modification is made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of December 31, 2020 or 60 days after the end of the COVID-19 emergency declaration and (ii) the applicable loan was not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. The provisions of the CARES Act dealing with temporary relief related to TDRs were extended pursuant to the CAA which was signed into law on December 27, 2020. The CAA extended the “applicable” period to the earlier of January 1, 2022 or 60 days after the date on which the national emergency concerning the COVID-19 pandemic terminates. The federal banking agencies also issued guidance to encourage banks to make loan modifications for borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and to assure banks that they will not be criticized by examiners for making such modifications. The Bank is currently applying this guidance to qualifying loan modifications.
FRB Programs and Initiatives Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic
In response to COVID-19, the FRB’s Federal Open Market Committee (the “FOMC”) on March 16, 2020, set the federal funds target rate at 0-0.25%. Consistent with FRB policy, the FRB has committed to the use of overnight reverse repurchase agreements as a supplementary policy tool, as necessary, to help control the federal funds rate and keep it in the target range set by the FOMC.
Newly Adopted Pronouncements in 2021: In December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The amendments in this ASU simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions and improves the consistent application of GAAP by clarifying and amending other existing guidance. The amendments in this ASU became effective on January 1, 2021 and did not have any material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”, universally referred to as Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”). The amendments in this ASU, among other things, require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today are still permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. For periodic report filers that are not smaller reporting companies, such as the Company, this standard (Topic 326) was effective as of January 1, 2020.
The Company elected to take advantage of Section 4014 of the CARES Act provision to temporarily delay adoption of the CECL methodology. The Company was subject to the adoption of the CECL accounting method under FASB ASU 2016-03
9

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION – (continued)
and related amendments, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326). The CARES Act allowed companies to defer the implementation of CECL until the earlier of when the national emergency related to the outbreak of COVID-19 ends or December 31, 2020 which was later extended to January 1, 2022. The Company adopted the CECL accounting method as of January 1, 2021 as allowed under the provisions of the CARES Act. The Bank’s CECL Committee, which includes members from Credit Administration, Accounting/Finance, Risk Management and Internal Audit, has oversight by the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Credit Officer. We engaged a third-party to assist us in developing our CECL model and to assist with evaluation of data and methodologies related to this standard.
As part of its process of adopting CECL, management implemented a third party software solution and determined appropriate loan segments, methodologies, model assumptions and qualitative components. Our CECL model includes portfolio loan segmentation based upon similar risk characteristics and both a quantitative and qualitative component of the calculation which incorporates a forecasting component of certain economic variables. Our implementation plan also includes the assessment and documentation of appropriate processes, policies and internal controls. Management had a third party independent consultant review and validate our CECL model.
In addition, Topic 326 amends the accounting for credit losses on certain debt securities. The Company did not record any allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) on its debt securities as a result of adopting Topic 326.
The ultimate impact of adopting Topic 326, and at each subsequent reporting period, is highly dependent on credit quality, macroeconomic forecasts and conditions, composition of our loans and available-for-sale securities portfolio, along with other management judgments. The Company adopted Topic 326 using the modified retrospective method. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2021 are presented under Topic 326 while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP.
In connection with our adoption of Topic 326, we made changes to our loan portfolio segments to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance under CECL. Refer to Note 5 Allowance for Credit Losses for further discussion of these portfolio segments. Our new segmentation breaks out Other loans from our original loan segments: Commercial Real Estate (“CRE”), Commercial and Industrial (“C&I”), Residential Mortgages and Construction. Other loans include unique risk attributes considered inconsistent with current underwriting standards. The Company recorded a net decrease to retained earnings of $50.7 million as of January 1, 2021 for the cumulative effect of adopting Topic 326.
The following table illustrates the impact of Topic 326:
January 1, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)As Reported Under
Topic 326
Pre
Topic 326
Impact of
Topic 326 Adoption
Assets
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans
Commercial Real Estate$41,458 $34,871 $6,587 
Commercial and Industrial4,071 2,692 1,379 
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions951 951 — 
Residential Mortgages5,356 2,000 3,356 
Other Consumer1,602 2,479 (877)
Construction6,277 6,357 (80)
Other 56,001 4,724 51,277 
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans$115,716 $54,074 $61,642 
Assets:
Total Loans Held for Investments, net$2,831,454 $2,893,096 $61,642 
Net deferred tax asset21,413 7,589 13,824 
Liabilities:
Life-of-loss Reserve on Unfunded Loan Commitments3,052 144 2,908 
Equity:
Retained Earnings$203,885 $254,611 $(50,726)
The adoption of Topic 326 resulted in a Day 1 adjustment of $64.5 million, including an increase to our ACL of $61.6 million and a $2.9 million life-of-loss reserve on our unfunded loan commitments recorded in other liabilities on our
10

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION – (continued)
Consolidated Balance Sheets on January 1, 2021. As of January 1, 2021, the Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment of $50.7 million to decrease retained earnings related to the adoption of Topic 326.
Allowance for Credit Losses Policy
The ACL represents an amount which, in management's judgment, is adequate to absorb expected losses on outstanding loans at the balance sheet date based on the evaluation of the size and current risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, past events, current conditions, reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions and prepayment experience. The ACL is measured and recorded upon the initial recognition of a financial asset. The ACL is reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries of previous losses, and is increased or decreased by a provision for credit losses, which is recorded as a current period operating expense.
Determination of an appropriate ACL is inherently complex and requires the use of significant and highly subjective estimates. The reasonableness of the ACL is reviewed quarterly by management.
Management believes it uses relevant information available to make determinations about the ACL and that it has established the existing allowance in accordance with GAAP. However, the determination of the ACL requires significant judgment, and estimates of expected losses in the loan portfolio can vary significantly from the amounts actually observed. While management uses available information to recognize expected losses, future additions to the ACL may be necessary based on changes in the loans comprising the portfolio, changes in the current and forecasted economic conditions, changes to the interest rate environment which may directly impact prepayment and curtailment rate assumptions, and changes in the financial condition of borrowers.
The adoption of CECL accounting did not result in a significant change to any other credit risk management and monitoring processes, including identification of past due or delinquent borrowers, nonaccrual practices, assessment of troubled debt restructurings or charge-off policy.
The Company’s methodology for estimating the ACL includes:
Segmentation. The Company’s loan portfolio is segmented by homogeneous loan types that behave similarly to economic cycles.
Specific Analysis. A specific reserve analysis is applied to certain individually evaluated loans. These loans are evaluated quarterly generally based on collateral value, observable market value or the present value of expected future cash flows. A specific reserve is established if the fair value is less than the loan balance. A charge-off is recognized when the loss is quantifiable. Individually evaluated loans, not specifically analyzed, reside in the Quantitative Analysis.
Quantitative Analysis. The Company elected to use Discounted Cash Flow (“DCF”). Economic forecasts include but are not limited to unemployment, the Consumer Price Index, the Housing Price Index and Gross Domestic Product. These forecasts are assumed to revert to the long-term average and utilized in the model to estimate the probability of default and loss given default through regression. Model assumptions include, but are not limited to, the discount rate, prepayments and curtailments. The product of the probability of default and the loss given default is the estimated loss rate, which varies over time. The estimated loss rate is applied within the appropriate periods in the cash flow model to determine the net present value. Net present value is also impacted by assumptions related to the duration between default and recovery. The reserve is based on the difference between the summation of the principal balances taking amortized costs into consideration and the summation of the net present values.
Qualitative Analysis. Based on management’s review and analysis of internal, external and model risks, management may adjust the model output. Management reviews the peaks and troughs of the model’s calibration, taking into account economic forecasts to develop guardrails that serve as the basis for determining the reasonableness of the model’s output and makes adjustments as necessary. This process challenges unexpected variability resulting from outputs beyond the model’s calibration that appear to be unreasonable. Additionally, management may adjust the economic forecast if it is incompatible with known market conditions based on management’s experience and perspective. At Day 1 adoption of CECL, current expected losses of $10.2 million were recorded due to economic uncertainties related to the Company's hospitality portfolio. Between the Day 1 CECL model and the model ended June 30, 2021, additional current expected losses of $1.5 million were recognized, which
11

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION – (continued)
resulted in a total current expected loss balance of $11.7 million as of June 30, 2021. Certain hospitality loans exhibit more than expected deterioration and the risk rating has been downgraded to non-pass to reflect the increased risk.
“Other” Segmented Pool
CECL provides for the flexibility to model loans differently compared to the Incurred Loss model. With the adoption of CECL, management elected to evaluate certain loans based on shared but unique risk attributes. The loans included in the Other segment of the model were underwritten and approved based on standards that are inconsistent with our current underwriting standards. The model for the Other segment was developed with subjective assumptions that may cause volatility driven by the following key factors: prepayment speeds, timing of contractual payments, discount rate, as well as other factors. The discount rate is reflective of the inherit risk in the Other segment. A significant change in these assumptions could cause a significant impact to the model causing volatility. Management reviews the model output for appropriateness and subjectively makes adjustments as needed. The analysis applied to this pool resulted in an increase in reserves of $51.3 million and is disclosed in the Other segment in the table above.
Accounting Statements Issued but Not Yet Adopted: In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. The amendments in this ASU provide optional guidance for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for or recognizing the effects of reference rate reform on financial reporting. The amendments provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to loan and lease agreements, derivative contracts, and other transactions affected by the anticipated transition away from the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) toward new interest rate benchmarks. Modified contracts that meet certain scope guidance are eligible for relief from the modification accounting requirements in US GAAP. The optional guidance generally allows for the modified contract to be accounted for as a continuation of the existing contract and does not require contract remeasurement at the modification date or reassessment of a previous accounting determination. The amendments in this ASU are effective through December 31, 2022. We are evaluating the impacts of this ASU and have not yet determined whether LIBOR transition and this ASU will have material effects on our business operations or consolidated financial statements.
12

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 2 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the two-class method. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. For all periods presented, the dilutive effect on average shares outstanding is the result of unvested restricted stock grants.
The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted earnings per share calculations for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands, except share and per share data)2021202020212020
Numerator for Earnings per Share – Basic and Diluted
Net Income$5,432 $4,455 $14,807 $8,878 
Less: Income allocated to participating shares25 15 69 30 
Net Income Allocated to Common Shareholders$5,407 $4,440 $14,738 $8,848 
Denominator:
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding, including Shares Considered Participating Securities26,466,922 26,384,957 26,437,761 26,373,803 
Less: Average Participating Securities122,818 88,528 122,818 88,528 
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding26,344,104 26,296,429 26,314,943 26,285,275 
Earnings per Common Share – Basic$0.21 $0.17 $0.56 $0.34 
Earnings per Common Share – Diluted$0.21 $0.17 $0.56 $0.34 
All outstanding unvested restricted stock awards are considered participating securities for the earnings per share calculation. As such, these shares have been allocated to a portion of net income and are excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation.
NOTE 3 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The following tables present the amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities as of the dates presented:
June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
U.S. Treasury Securities$4,438 $27 $(25)$4,440 
U.S. Government Agency Securities3,445 32 — 3,477 
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities62,074 276 (456)61,894 
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities2,134 111 — 2,245 
Asset Backed Securities137,926 816 (536)138,206 
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations255,808 4,407 (405)259,810 
Small Business Administration102,392 941 (659)102,674 
States and Political Subdivisions221,818 8,544 (628)229,734 
Corporate Notes40,750 382 (74)41,058 
Total Debt Securities$830,785 $15,536 $(2,783)$843,538 
13

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES (continued)
December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities$44,057 $1,008 $(341)$44,724 
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities5,194 253 — 5,447 
Asset Backed Securities133,672 884 (999)133,557 
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations212,751 6,007 (399)218,359 
Small Business Administration99,604 346 (805)99,145 
States and Political Subdivisions239,251 13,490 (119)252,622 
Corporate Notes24,250 582 (7)24,825 
Total Debt Securities$758,779 $22,570 $(2,670)$778,679 
The Company did not have securities classified as held-to-maturity at June 30, 2021 or December 31, 2020.
The following table shows the composition of gross and net realized gains and losses for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)2021202020212020
Proceeds from Sales of Securities Available-for-Sale$43,430 $42,167 $108,300 $96,669 
Gross Realized Gains$1,565 $2,354 $5,194 $3,571 
Gross Realized Losses(66)(33)(85)(36)
Net Realized Gains1,499 2,321 5,109 3,535 
Tax Impact$318 $487 $1,076 $742 
Gains or losses are recognized in earnings on the trade date using the amortized cost of the specific security sold. The net realized gains above reflect reclassification adjustments in the calculation of other comprehensive income. The net realized gains are included in noninterest income as gains on sales of securities, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The tax impact is included in income tax provision in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale debt securities are shown below by contractual maturity as of the date presented. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date are shown separately.
June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Due in One Year or Less$1,157 $1,164 
Due after One Year through Five Years3,492 3,519 
Due after Five Years through Ten Years166,435 168,538 
Due after Ten Years201,759 208,162 
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities62,074 61,894 
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities2,134 2,245 
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations255,808 259,810 
Asset Backed Securities137,926 138,206 
Total Debt Securities$830,785 $843,538 
At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than those securities issued by or collateralized by the U.S. Government and its Agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of shareholders’ equity. The carrying value of securities pledged for various regulatory and legal requirements was $145.9 million at June 30, 2021 and $146.0 million at December 31, 2020.
14

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES (continued)
Available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, were as follows:
June 30, 2021
Less Than 12 Months12 Months or MoreTotal
(Dollars in Thousands)Number
of
Securities
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Number
of
Securities
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Number
of
Securities
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
U.S. Treasury Securities$2,430 $(25)— $— $— $2,430 $(25)
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities13 39,144 (454)27 (2)16 39,171 (456)
Asset Backed Securities21,883 (100)20 41,153 (436)29 63,036 (536)
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations12 37,980 (257)18,538 (148)20 56,518 (405)
Small Business Administration7,885 (196)58 26,895 (463)63 34,780 (659)
States and Political Subdivisions27 34,467 (602)696 (26)29 35,163 (628)
Corporate Notes12,426 (74)— — — 12,426 (74)
Total Debt Securities72 $156,215 $(1,708)91 $87,309 $(1,075)163 $243,524 $(2,783)
December 31, 2020
Less Than 12 Months12 Months or MoreTotal
(Dollars in Thousands)Number
of
Securities
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Number
of
Securities
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Number
of
Securities
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities7$21,109 $(339)3$40 $(2)10$21,149 $(341)
Asset Backed Securities1123,653 (219)2761,599 (780)3885,252 (999)
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations1348,318 (212)1438,615 (187)2786,933 (399)
Small Business Administration710,444 (53)7347,371 (752)8057,815 (805)
States and Political Subdivisions1212,558 (119)— — 1212,558 (119)
Corporate Notes12,493 (7)— — 12,493 (7)
Total Debt Securities51$118,575 $(949)117$147,625 $(1,721)168$266,200 $(2,670)
The Company adopted Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) on January 1, 2021 and did not record an ACL on its investment securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2021 as the Company did not have securities classified as held-to-maturity at June 30, 2021. The Company regularly reviews debt securities for expected credit loss using both qualitative and quantitative criteria, as necessary, based on the composition of the portfolio at period end.
Securities are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) quarterly and more frequently if economic or market concerns warrant. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, the credit quality of the issuer, and whether the Company intends to sell the security or may be required to sell the security prior to maturity. The Company has reviewed all securities for OTTI.
As of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, no OTTI has been identified for any investment securities in our portfolio. We do not believe any individual unrealized loss as of June 30, 2021 represents an OTTI. At June 30, 2021, there were 163 securities in an unrealized loss position and at December 31, 2020, there were 168 securities in an unrealized loss position. The unrealized losses on debt securities were primarily attributable to changes in interest rates and not related to the credit quality of these securities. All debt securities are determined to be investment grade and are paying principal and interest according to the contractual terms of the security. We generally do not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell any of the securities in an unrealized loss position before recovery of their amortized cost.
15

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND LOANS HELD-FOR-SALE
The composition of the loan portfolio by dollar amount is shown in the table below:
(Dollars in Thousands)
June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
Commercial
Commercial Real Estate
$1,337,792 $1,453,799 
Commercial and Industrial
413,842 557,164 
Total Commercial Loans
1,751,634 2,010,963 
Consumer
Residential Mortgages
425,642 472,170 
Other Consumer
43,336 57,647 
Total Consumer Loans
468,978 529,817 
Construction320,885 406,390 
Other (1)
375,157  
Total Portfolio Loans$2,916,654 $2,947,170 
Loans Held-for-Sale$9,311 $25,437 
Loans Held-for-Sale in Connection with Sale of Bank Branches, at the lower of cost or fair value$— $9,835 
Total Loans$2,925,965 $2,982,442 
(1) Refer to Note 1, Basis of Presentation for details of reclassification of our portfolio segments related to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.
We attempt to limit our exposure to credit risk by diversifying our loan portfolio by segment, geography, collateral and industry and actively managing concentrations. When concentrations exist in certain segments, this risk is mitigated by reviewing the relevant economic indicators and internal risk rating trends of the loans in these segments. The Company has specific loan segment limits in its loan policy. Total commercial real estate balances should not exceed the combination of 300% of total risk-based capital and growth in excess of 50% over the previous thirty-six months and construction loan balances should not exceed 100% of total risk-based capital. Investment real estate property types and purchased loan programs have individual dollar limits that should not be exceeded in the portfolio. In addition, there are specific limits in place for various categories of real estate loans with regards to loan-to-value ratios, loan terms, and amortization periods. We also have policy limits on loan-to-cost for construction projects.
Unsecured loans pose higher risk for the Company due to the lack of a well-defined secondary source of repayment. Commercial unsecured loans are reserved for the best quality customers with well-established businesses, operate with low financial and operating leverage. The repayment capacity of the borrower should exceed the policy and guidelines for secured loans. If the borrower is unable to comply with this requirement and the Company is willing to renew the credit facility, the line should be secured and/or begin amortization.
The Company provided deferrals to customers under Section 4013 of the CARES Act and regulatory interagency statements on loan modifications, which suspends the requirement to categorize these deferrals as TDRs. The Part I program was launched in March 2020 and expired at the end of August 2020. The deferrals in Part I typically provided deferral of both principal and interest through the expiry. The Part II program was launched in July 2020 and expired at the end of December 2020. The deferrals in this program were needs based and required the collection of updated financial information and in certain situations, the validation of liquidity to support the business. Prior to the extension of the CARES Act, the Company launched the Part III program that offered borrowers in the Part II program an extension of deferrals through June 2021. Those borrowers who opted into the Part III program were required to provide monthly financial statements and remit payments on a quarterly basis based on excess cash flows, if any, up to their otherwise contractual payment. The majority of deferrals in the Part III program were principal only deferrals. At the end of the deferral period in Part III, which expired at June 30, 2021, for term loans, payments were applied to accrued interest first and resumed principal payments once accrued interest was current. Deferred principal is due at maturity. For interest only loans, such as lines of credit, deferred interest was due at maturity. The expiration of the Part III program as of June 30, 2021 marked the end of any payment deferral programs for the Company.
16

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND LOANS HELD-FOR-SALE (continued)
In connection with our adoption of Topic 326, we made changes to our loan portfolio segments to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance under CECL. Our new segmentation breaks out Other loans from our original loan segments: CRE, C&I, Construction and Residential Mortgages. At March 31, 2021 related to the adoption of Topic 326, the initial break-out of other loans totaled $373.4 million consisting of loans that would otherwise have been included in the following loan segments: $136.3 million of CRE, $77.8 million of C&I, $49.6 million of Residential Mortgages and $109.7 million of Construction. This segment of loans includes unique risk attributes considered inconsistent with current underwriting standards. The analysis applied to the Other loans segment, at adoption, resulted in an increase in current expected credit losses of $51.3 million.
Deferred costs and fees included in the portfolio balances above were $2.9 million and $3.0 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Discounts on purchased 1-4 family loans included in the portfolio balances above were $205 thousand and $219 thousand at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.
Mortgage loans held-for-sale were $9.3 million and $25.4 million as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. In addition to mortgage loans held-for-sale, the Company had $9.8 million in loans held-for-sale in connection with the sale of bank branches at December 31, 2020, that closed in the second quarter of 2021.
Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDR”)
The following table summarizes the Company’s TDRs as of the dates presented:
June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Performing
TDRs
Nonperforming
TDRs
Total
TDRs
Performing
TDRs
Nonperforming
TDRs
Total
TDRs
Commercial
Commercial Real Estate$6,107 $146 $6,253 $6,151 $21,667 $27,818 
Commercial and Industrial— — — — — — 
Total Commercial TDRs6,107 146 6,253 6,151 21,667 27,818 
Consumer
Residential Mortgages— — — 50,618 — 50,618 
Other Consumer— — — — — — 
Total Consumer TDRs   50,618  50,618 
Construction541 3,071 3,612 52,481 3,319 55,800 
Other99,566 — 99,566 — — — 
Total TDRs(1)
$106,214 $3,217 $109,431 $109,250 $24,986 $134,236 
(1) Refer to Note 1, Basis of Presentation for details of reclassification of our portfolio segments related to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.
In order to maximize the collection of loan balances, the Company evaluates troubled loan accounts on a case-by-case basis to determine if a loan modification would be appropriate. Loan modifications may be utilized when there is a reasonable chance that an appropriate modification would allow our client to continue servicing the debt. A loan is a TDR if both of the following exist: 1) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, and 2) a creditor has granted a concession to the debtor that it would not normally grant. Nonaccrual loans that are modified can be placed back on accrual status when both principal and interest are current and it is probable that the Company will be able to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the terms of the loan agreement. As of June 30, 2021, there were minimal commitments to lend additional funds for loans identified as TDRs.
TDRs decreased $24.8 million, or 18.5% to $109.4 million at June 30, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020. The Company received $13.6 million and $16.6 million of pay-downs and had no new additions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively. The $24.8 million of pay-downs included $8.2 million in charge-offs for the resolution of our two largest nonperforming credits. There were no new TDRs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021. TDRs of $3.2 million and $25.0 million were nonaccrual as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2021, the Company modified no loans that constituted a TDR that had minimal commitments to lend additional funds. The Company had one consumer automobile loan modified as a TDR during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020. The customer was experiencing financial difficulties, but sold the vehicle and the proceeds from that sale were applied to the loan balance. The remaining balance was charged-off, but the loan has been re-amortized for the customer to repay the balance by the end of 2021.
17

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND LOANS HELD-FOR-SALE (continued)
There were no TDR payment defaults during the three and six months ended June 30, 2021. For purposes of this disclosure, a TDR payment default occurs when, within 12 months of the original TDR modification, either a full or partial charge-off occurs or a TDR becomes 90 days or more past due. At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, we had $3.2 million and $25.0 million, respectively, in loans modified as TDRs that had experienced a payment default subsequent to the rework date and were classified as nonperforming.
The specific reserve portion of the ACL on TDRs, if required, is determined by discounting the restructured cash flow at the original effective rate of the loan before modification or is based on the fair value of the collateral less cost to sell, if repayment of the loan is collateral dependent. If the resulting amount is less than the recorded book value, the Company either establishes a valuation allowance as a component of the ACL or charges off the individually evaluated loan balance if it determines that such amount is a confirmed loss. This method is used consistently for all segments of the portfolio.
The following table presents nonperforming assets as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
Nonperforming Assets
(Dollars in Thousands)June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
Nonperforming Assets
Nonaccrual loans$6,351 $7,018 
Nonaccrual TDRs3,217 24,986 
Total Nonaccrual Loans9,568 32,004 
Other Real Estate Owned, or (“OREO”)21,250 15,722 
Total Nonperforming Assets$30,818 $47,726 
As of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, we had $15 thousand and $67 thousand, respectively, of residential real estate in the process of foreclosure. We also had $57 thousand at June 30, 2021 and $109 thousand at December 31, 2020 in residential real estate included in OREO.
NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The Company maintains an ACL at a level determined to be adequate to absorb current expected credit losses over the life of loans inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. Refer to Note 1, Basis of Presentation for details of reclassification of our portfolio segments related to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instrument. The Company develops and documents a systematic ACL methodology based on the following portfolio segments: 1) CRE, 2) C&I, 3) Residential Mortgages, 4) Other Consumer, 5) Construction and 6) Other. The Company’s loan portfolio is segmented by homogeneous loan types that behave similarly to economic cycles. The segmentation in the CECL model is different from the segmentation in the Incurred Loss model. The following is a discussion of the key risks by portfolio segment that management assesses in preparing the ACL.
CRE loans are secured by commercial purpose real estate, including both owner occupied properties and investment properties, for various purposes such as hotels, strip malls and apartments. Operations of the individual projects as well as global cash flows of the debtors are the primary sources of repayment for these loans. The condition of the local economy is an important indicator of risk, but there are also more specific risks depending on the collateral type as well as the business.
C&I loans are made to operating companies or manufacturers for the purpose of production, operating capacity, accounts receivable, inventory or equipment financing. Cash flow from the operations of the borrower is the primary source of repayment for these loans. The condition of the local economy is an important indicator of risk, but there are also more specific risks depending on the industry of the borrower. Collateral for these types of loans often do not have sufficient value in a distressed or liquidation scenario to satisfy the outstanding debt. These loans are also made to local and state municipalities for various purposes including refinancing existing obligations, infrastructure up-fit and expansion, or to purchase new equipment. These loans may be secured by general obligations from the municipal authority or revenues generated by infrastructure and equipment financed by the Company. The primary repayment source for these loans include the tax base of the municipality, specific revenue streams related to the infrastructure financed, and other business operations of the municipal authority. The health and stability of state and local economies directly impacts each municipality’s tax basis and are important indicators of risk for this segment. The ability of each municipality to increase taxes and fees to offset debt service requirements give this type of loan a very low risk profile in the continuum of the Company’s loan portfolio.
18

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (continued)
Residential Mortgages are loans secured by first and second liens such as home equity loans, home equity lines of credit and 1-4 family residential mortgages, including purchase money mortgages. The primary source of repayment for these loans is the income of the borrower. The condition of the local economy, in particular the unemployment rate, is an important indicator of risk for this segment. The state of the local housing market can also have a significant impact on this segment because low demand and/or declining home values can limit the ability of borrowers to sell a property and satisfy the debt.
Other Consumer loans are made to individuals and may be either secured by assets other than 1-4 family residences or unsecured. This segment includes auto loans and unsecured loans and lines. The primary source of repayment for these loans is the income and assets of the borrower. The condition of the local economy, in particular the unemployment rate, is an important indicator of risk for this segment. The value of the collateral, if there is any, is less likely to be a source of repayment due to less certain collateral values.
Construction loans include both commercial and consumer. Commercial loans are made to finance construction of buildings or other structures, as well as to finance the acquisition and development of raw land for various purposes. While the risk of these loans is generally confined to the construction period, if there are problems, the project may not be completed, and as such, may not provide sufficient cash flow on its own to service the debt or have sufficient value in a liquidation to cover the outstanding principal. The condition of the local economy is an important indicator of risk, but there are also more specific risks depending on the type of project and the experience and resources of the developer. Consumer loans are made for the construction of residential homes for which a binding sales contract exists and generally are for a period of time sufficient to complete construction. Residential construction loans to individuals generally provide for the payment of interest only during the construction phase. Credit risk for residential real estate construction loans can arise from construction delays, cost overruns, failure of the contractor to complete the project to specifications and economic conditions that could impact demand for or supply of the property being constructed.
Other loans include unique risk attributes considered inconsistent with our current underwriting standards. The ACL reserve for the Other segment is based on a discounted cash flow methodology and reserves will fluctuate based on expected cash flow changes in the future. These inconsistencies may include, but are not limited to i) transaction and/or relationship sizes that exceed limits established in 2018, ii) overreliance on secondary, tertiary or guarantor cash flow, iii) land acquisition loans without a defined source of amortization, and iv) loan structures on operating lines of credit dependent on the value of real estate rather than trading assets. Management continuously assesses underwriting standards, but significantly enhanced these standards in 2018. Our model is based on our best estimate of facts known with the most current information. Certain portions of the CECL model are inherently subjective and include, but are not limited to estimates with respect to: prepayment speeds, the timing of prepayments, potential losses given default, discount rates and the timing of future cash flows. Management utilizes widely published economic forecasts as the basis for the regression analysis used to estimate the probability of default in the baseline model. The peaks and troughs of these forecasts serve as guardrails for potential subjective adjustments. In addition to considering the outcomes based on the range of forecasts, management recognizes that the assumptions used in economic forecasts may not perfectly align with our market area, risk profile or unique attributes of our portfolio along with other important considerations. Severe changes in forecasts can also create significant variability and management must assess not only the absolute balance of reserves but also consider the appropriateness of the velocity of change. Therefore, management developed a framework to assess the tolerance and reasonableness of the CECL modeling process by challenging certain elements of the forecasts, when appropriate. These outcomes, known as “challenger models” provide opportunities to examine and subjectively adjust the CECL model output and are designed to be counter cyclical, thereby reducing variability.
Credit Quality Indicators:
The Company’s portfolio grading analysis estimates the capability of the borrower to repay the contractual obligations of the loan agreements as scheduled or at all. The Company’s internal credit risk grading system is based on debt service coverage, collateral values and other subjective factors. Mortgage and consumer loans are defaulted to a pass grade until a loan migrates to past due status.
The Company has a loan review policy and annual scope report that details the level of loan review for commercial loans in a given year. Primary objectives of loan reviews include the identification of emerging risks and patterns that might influence potential future losses. In concert with significant enhancements to the underwriting process, the scope of loan review has been broadened since 2019 to include assurance testing with respect to the accuracy of the underwriting function. Since 2020 and continuing into 2021, the Company used a four step approach for loan review in the following categories:
19

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (continued)
A review of the largest twenty pass-rated loan relationships, which represents approximately a quarter of total loans;
A sampling of new loans originated to include an examination of the evidence of appropriate approval, adherence to loan policy and the completeness and accuracy of the analysis contained in the approval document;
A sampling of Large Loan Relationships (“LLRs”) which are defined as loan relationships with aggregate exposure of at least $2.0 million that are not part of the top twenty review; and
Concentration focus reviews of identified segments that represent concentration risk, represented by collateral types including but not limited to hospitality, multifamily and retail with the goal of examining patterns of loss history, document exceptions, policy exceptions and emerging trends in risk characteristics.
The Company’s internally assigned grades are as follows:
Pass – The Company uses six grades of pass. Generally, a pass rating indicates that the loan is currently performing and is of high quality.
Special Mention – Assets with potential weaknesses that warrant management’s close attention and if left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institutions credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant classified classification.
Substandard – Assets that are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. Such assets are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful – Assets with all the weaknesses inherent in one classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently known facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.
Loss – Assets considered of such little value that its continuance on the books is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless asset even though partial recovery may be affected in the future.
20

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (continued)
The following table presents loan balances by year of origination and internally assigned risk rating for our portfolio segments as of June 30, 2021:
Risk Rating
(Dollars in Thousands)202120202019201820172016 and PriorRevolvingTotal
Commercial Real Estate
Pass$58,201 $161,432 $196,469 $330,423 $118,980 $354,304 $52,651 $1,272,460 
Special Mention— — 5,852 8,143 3,046 931 — 17,972 
Substandard230 — 471 4,553 34,889 7,217 — 47,360 
Total Commercial Real Estate$58,431 $161,432 $202,792 $343,119 $156,915 $362,452 $52,651 $1,337,792 
Commercial and Industrial
Pass$25,615 $58,536 $14,819 $37,315 $23,016 $241,028 $12,815 $413,144 
Special Mention— 10 — 13 — — — 23 
Substandard— — 455 220 — — — 675 
Total Commercial and Industrial$25,615 $58,546 $15,274 $37,548 $23,016 $241,028 $12,815 $413,842 
Residential Mortgages
Pass$74,684 $98,690 $79,166 $95,260 $8,937 $53,540 $10,896 $421,173 
Special Mention— — — — — 570 — 570 
Substandard— — 1,193 822 225 1,659 — 3,899 
Total Residential Mortgages$74,684 $98,690 $80,359 $96,082 $9,162 $55,769 $10,896 $425,642 
Other Consumer
Pass$4,314 $13,420 $1,803 $794 $272 $22,268 $341 $43,212 
Special Mention— — — — — — — — 
Substandard— 19 68 36 — — 124 
Total Other Consumer$4,314 $13,439 $1,804 $862 $308 $22,268 $341 $43,336 
Construction
Pass$75,794 $104,595 $85,487 $10,913 $16,658 $4,337 $17,172 $314,956 
Special Mention— — 179 — — 442 — 621 
Substandard— 107 3,223 97 1,741 140 — 5,308 
Total Construction$75,794 $104,702 $88,889 $11,010 $18,399 $4,919 $17,172 $320,885 
Other
Pass$— $— $— $— $— $4,659 $219 $4,878 
Special Mention— — — — 122,895 61,651 — 184,546 
Substandard— — — 88,345 48,524 48,864 — 185,733 
Total Other Loans$ $ $ $88,345 $171,419 $115,174 $219 $375,157 
Total Portfolio Loans
Pass$238,608 $436,673 $377,744 $474,705 $167,863 $680,136 $94,094 $2,469,823 
Special Mention— 10 6,031 8,156 125,941 63,594 — 203,732 
Substandard230 126 5,343 94,105 85,415 57,880 — 243,099 
Total Portfolio Loans$238,838 $436,809 $389,118 $576,966 $379,219 $801,610 $94,094 $2,916,654 
21

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (continued)
The following table presents loan balances by year of origination and performing and nonperforming status for our portfolio segments as of June 30, 2021.
(Dollars in Thousands)202120202019201820172016 and PriorRevolvingTotal
Commercial Real Estate
Performing$58,201 $161,432 $202,321 $343,119 $156,915 $362,375 $52,651 $1,337,014 
Nonperforming230 — 471 — — 77 — 778 
Total Commercial Real Estate$58,431 $161,432 $202,792 $343,119 $156,915 $362,452 $52,651 $1,337,792 
Commercial and Industrial
Performing$25,615 $58,546 $14,820 $37,328 $23,016 $241,028 $12,815 $413,168 
Nonperforming— — 454 220 — — — 674 
Total Commercial and Industrial$25,615 $58,546 $15,274 $37,548 $23,016 $241,028 $12,815 $413,842 
Residential Mortgages
Performing$74,684 $98,690 $79,165 $95,727 $8,937 $54,702 $10,896 $422,801 
Nonperforming— — 1,194 355 225 1,067 — 2,841 
Total Residential Mortgages$74,684 $98,690 $80,359 $96,082 $9,162 $55,769 $10,896 $425,642 
Other Consumer
Performing$4,314 $13,427 $1,804 $794 $298 $22,268 $341 $43,246 
Nonperforming— 12 — 68 10 — — 90 
Total Other Consumer$4,314 $13,439 $1,804 $862 $308 $22,268 $341 $43,336 
Construction
Performing$75,794 $104,595 $85,666 $11,010 $16,658 $4,805 $17,172 $315,700 
Nonperforming— 107 3,223 — 1,741 114 — 5,185 
Total Construction$75,794 $104,702 $88,889 $11,010 $18,399 $4,919 $17,172 $320,885 
Other
Performing$— $— $— $88,345 $171,419 $115,174 $219 $375,157 
Nonperforming— — — — — — — — 
Total Other Loans$ $ $ $88,345 $171,419 $115,174 $219 $375,157 
Total Portfolio Loans
Performing$238,608 $436,690 $383,776 $576,323 $377,243 $800,352 $94,094 $2,907,086 
Nonperforming230 119 5,342 643 1,976 1,258 — 9,568 
Total Portfolio Loans$238,838 $436,809 $389,118 $576,966 $379,219 $801,610 $94,094 $2,916,654 

22

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (continued)
The following table presents the aging of the amortized cost basis in past due loans for our portfolio segments as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020:
June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Current
Loans
Loans
30-59 Days
Past Due
Loans
60-89 Days
Past Due
Total
30-89 Days
Past Due
Nonaccrual
Loans
Total Portfolio
Loans
Commercial Real Estate$1,331,082 $80 $5,852 $5,932 $778 $1,337,792 
Commercial and Industrial413,044 31 93 124 674 413,842 
Residential Mortgages422,296 505 — 505 2,841 425,642 
Other Consumer42,919 207 120 327 90 43,336 
Construction315,684 16 — 16 5,185 320,885 
Other375,157 — — — — 375,157 
Total (1)
$2,900,182 $839 $6,065 $6,904 $9,568 $2,916,654 
(1) Refer to Note 1, Basis of Presentation for details of reclassification of our portfolio segments related to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.
December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Current
Loans
Loans
30-59 Days
Past Due
Loans
60-89 Days
Past Due
Total
30-89 Days
Past Due
Nonaccrual
Loans
Total Portfolio
Loans
Commercial Real Estate$1,428,092 $3,487 $329 $3,816 $21,891 $1,453,799 
Commercial and Industrial556,324 194 190 384 456 557,164 
Construction400,775 193 91 284 5,331 406,390 
Residential Mortgages466,688 1,347 — 1,347 4,135 472,170 
Other Consumer56,890 278 295 573 184 57,647 
Total$2,908,769 $5,499 $905 $6,404 $31,997 $2,947,170 
The following table presents loans on nonaccrual status and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing by class of loan as of June 30, 2021. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, the amount of interest income on nonaccrual loans was immaterial. There were no loans at June 30, 2021 that were past due more than 90 days and still accruing.
June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Beginning of
Period
Nonaccrual
End of
Period
Nonaccrual
Nonaccrual
With No
Related
Allowance
Past Due
90+ Days
Still Accruing
Commercial Real Estate$21,891 $778 $146 $— 
Commercial and Industrial456 674 — — 
Residential Mortgages4,135 2,841 — — 
Other Consumer184 90 — — 
Construction5,331 5,185 3,073 — 
Other— — — — 
Total Portfolio Loans$31,997 $9,568 $3,219 $ 
A loan is considered impaired when it is transferred to nonaccrual status, or remains on accrual status but is considered a TDR. Impaired loans with a commitment of $1.0 million or more are individually evaluated. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, no material amount of interest income was recognized on individually evaluated loans subsequent to their classification as individually evaluated loans.
23

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (continued)
The following table presents the amortized cost basis of individually evaluated loans as of June 30, 2021. Changes in the fair value of the collateral for individually evaluated loans are reported as credit loss expense or a reversal of credit loss expense in the period of change.
June 30, 2021
Type of Collateral
(Dollars in Thousands)Real Estate
Commercial Real Estate$3,208 
Commercial and Industrial— 
Residential Mortgages— 
Other Consumer— 
Construction4,811 
Other 
Total$8,019 
The following table presents activity in the ACL and ALL for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, respectively:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
and
Industrial
Residential
Mortgage
Other
Consumer
Construction
Other (1)
Total
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans:
Balance at Beginning of Period$42,342$4,905 $5,171$1,347$7,106$56,001$116,872
Provision for Credit Losses on Loans(6,103)(185)2172691,0395,730967
Charge-offs(8,238)(7)(22)(539)(8,806)
Recoveries1401144286
Net (Charge-offs) / Recoveries(8,098)(6)(21)(395)(8,520)
Balance at End of Period$28,141$4,714 $5,367$1,221$8,145$61,731$109,319
(1) In connection with our adoption of Topic 326, we made changes to our loan portfolio segments to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance under CECL. Our new segmentation breaks out Other loans from our original loan segments: CRE, C&I , residential mortgages and construction. The allowance balance at the beginning of period was reclassified to Other from their original loan segments: CRE, C&I, residential mortgages and construction to conform to current presentation.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
and
Industrial
Residential
Mortgage
Other
Consumer
Construction
Other (1)
Total
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans:
Balance at Beginning of Period$34,871$3,643 $2,000$2,479$6,357$4,724$54,074
Impact of CECL Adoption6,5871,379 3,356(877)(80)51,27761,642
Provision for Credit Losses on Loans(5,219)(302)617471,8075,7302,824
Charge-offs(8,238)(8)(217)(1,409)(9,872)
Recoveries14016728161651
Net (Charge-offs) / Recoveries(8,098)(6)(50)(1,128)61(9,221)
Balance at End of Period$28,141$4,714 $5,367$1,221$8,145$61,731$109,319
(1) In connection with our adoption of Topic 326, we made changes to our loan portfolio segments to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance under CECL. Our new segmentation breaks out Other loans from our original loan segments: CRE, C&I , residential mortgages and construction. The allowance balance at the beginning of period was reclassified to Other from their original loan segments: CRE, C&I, residential mortgages and construction to conform to current presentation.
24

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (continued)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
and
Industrial

Construction
Residential
Mortgage
Other
Consumer
Total
Allowance for Loan Losses on Loans:
Balance at Beginning of Period$26,073$3,990 $7,334$1,811$3,734$42,942
Provision for Loan Losses on Loans2,513848 1,0433906795,473
Charge-offs(40)(8)(15)(1,094)(1,157)
Recoveries146147
Net (Charge-offs) / Recoveries(40)(7)(15)(948)(1,010)
Balance at End of Period$28,546$4,831 $8,377$2,186$3,465$47,405
Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
and
Industrial
ConstructionResidential
Mortgage
Other
Consumer
Total
Allowance for Loan Losses on Loans:
Balance at Beginning of Period$24,706$3,601 $5,420$1,736$3,299$38,762
Provision for Loan Losses on Loans3,1731,274 2,9574702,39710,271
Charge-offs(40)(46)(20)(2,621)(2,727)
Recoveries7073901,099
Net Recoveries / (Charge-offs) 667(44)(20)(2,231)(1,628)
Balance at End of Period$28,546$4,831 $8,377$2,186$3,465$47,405
The adoption of Topic 326 resulted in an increase to our ACL of $61.6 million on January 1, 2021. The Day 1 model introduced a segmented pool of loans for discrete analysis. This segmented pool had an aggregate principal balance of $373.4 million at March 31, 2021, the initial break-out, and included unique risk attributes considered inconsistent with current underwriting standards. The analysis applied to this pool resulted in an increase in expected credit losses of $51.3 million, at adoption, and is disclosed in the Other segment in the 2021 tables below.
At December 31, 2020, the aforementioned Other segment within the probable incurred loss model included $102.5 million of impaired loans and the remaining $270.9 million were not impaired and remained in their respective segments. Based on the fair value of collateral, the specific reserves on the impaired loans totaled zero and the general reserves for the remainder of these loans totaled $4.7 million at December 31, 2020.
Our CECL methodology introduced a modified discounted cash flow methodology based on expected cash flow changes in the future for the Other segment. A significant population of the Other segment was not impaired under the probable incurred loss model and therefore not subject to a collateral dependent specific reserve analysis. For the population of the Other segment that was impaired under the incurred loss model, based on collateral values, the specific reserves totaled zero. Certain portions of the CECL model are inherently subjective and include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to: prepayment speeds, the timing of prepayments, potential losses given default, discount rates and the timing of future cash flows. Management utilizes widely published economic forecasts as the basis for the regression analysis used to estimate the probability of default in the baseline model. The peaks and troughs of these forecasts serve as guardrails for potential subjective adjustments. In addition to considering the outcomes based on the range of forecasts, management recognizes that the assumptions used in economic forecasts may not perfectly align with our market area, risk profile or unique attributes of our portfolio along with other important considerations. Severe changes in forecasts can also create significant variability and management must assess not only the absolute balance of reserves but also consider the appropriateness of the velocity of change. Therefore, management developed a framework to assess the tolerance and reasonableness of the CECL modeling process by challenging certain elements of the forecasts, when appropriate. These outcomes, known as “challenger models,” provide opportunities to examine and subjectively adjust the CECL model output and are designed to be counter cyclical, thereby reducing variability. An expected credit loss of $56.0 million upon adoption, which is an increase from the $4.7 million under the probable incurred loss model, was established based on the discounted cash flow method with a discount rate, which was quantitatively adjusted.
The ACL increased $55.2 million to $109.3 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $54.1 million at December 31, 2020 primarily due to the Day 1 adoption of CECL of $61.6 million. In the first six months of 2021, adjustments to the CECL model were made to account for additional potential deterioration in credit quality with respect to certain hospitality loans on deferral.
25

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (continued)
Management reviews and analyzes the monthly operating statements of commercial clients in the deferral program. The recovery has not been as sharp as management had anticipated as observed in other hospitality credits. Hospitality loans on deferral at the end of Phase III of the deferral program, which expired on June 30, 2021, had an aggregate principal balances of $50.9 million, which resulted in a current expected credit loss of $11.7 million. The Day 1 model recognized the deterioration of loans with an aggregate principal balance of $42.8 million which resulted in current expected losses of $10.2 million as of January 1, 2021. Between the Day 1 model and the model ended June 30, 2021 a loan with a principal balance of $8.1 million experienced additional deterioration resulting in additional current expected losses of $1.5 million in the first quarter of 2021.
Included in the provision for unfunded commitments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 was a release of $0.6 million and $0.9 million for the life-of-loss reserve for unfunded commitments.
The following table presents the recorded investment in commercial loan classes by internally assigned risk ratings and loan classes by performing and nonperforming status as of June 30, 2021:
June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
and
Industrial
Residential MortgageOther ConsumerConstructionOtherTotal Portfolio
Loans
Pass$1,272,460 $413,144 $421,173 $43,212 $314,956 $4,878 $2,469,823 
Special Mention17,972 23 570 — 621 184,546 203,732 
Substandard47,360 675 3,899 124 5,308 185,733 243,099 
Doubtful— — — — — — — 
Loss— — — — — — — 
Total Portfolio Loans$1,337,792 $413,842 $425,642 $43,336 $320,885 $375,157 $2,916,654 
Performing$1,337,014 $413,168 $422,801 $43,246 $315,700 $375,157 $2,907,086 
Nonperforming778 674 2,841 90 5,185 — 9,568 
Total Portfolio Loans$1,337,792 $413,842 $425,642 $43,336 $320,885 $375,157 $2,916,654 
Prior to the adoption of Topic 326 on January 1, 2021, we calculated our allowance for loan losses using an incurred loan loss methodology. The following tables are disclosures related to the allowance for loan losses in prior periods.
The following table presents the recorded investment in commercial loan classes by internally assigned risk ratings and loan classes by performing and nonperforming status as of December 31, 2020:
December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
and
Industrial
ConstructionResidential
Mortgage
Other
Consumer
Total
Portfolio Loans
Pass$1,281,106 $478,536 $289,781 $415,773 $57,418 $2,522,614 
Special Mention126,535 48 58,899 723 186,211 
Substandard46,158 78,580 57,710 55,674 223 238,345 
Doubtful— — — — — — 
Loss— — — — — — 
Total Portfolio Loans$1,453,799 $557,164 $406,390 $472,170 $57,647 $2,947,170 
Performing$1,431,908 $556,708 $401,059 $468,035 $57,463 $2,915,173 
Nonperforming21,891 456 5,331 4,135 184 31,997 
Total Portfolio Loans$1,453,799 $557,164 $406,390 $472,170 $57,647 $2,947,170 
26

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (continued)
The following tables present the balances in the ALL and the recorded investment in the loan balances based on impairment method as of December 31, 2020:
December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
and
Industrial
ConstructionResidential
Mortgage
Other
Consumer
Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Individually Evaluated for Impairment$13,773 $— $1,477 $— $— $15,250 
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment22,655 5,064 6,527 2,099 2,479 38,824 
Total Allowance for Loan Losses$36,428 $5,064 $8,004 $2,099 $2,479 $54,074 
Total Portfolio Loans:
Individually Evaluated for Impairment$27,666 $— $56,987 $50,618 $— $135,271 
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment1,426,133 557,164 349,403 421,552 57,647 2,811,899 
Total Portfolio Loans$1,453,799 $557,164 $406,390 $472,170 $57,647 $2,947,170 
The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable. Individually evaluated loans do not include certain TDR loans which are less than $1.0 million. The following table includes the recorded investment and unpaid principal balance for impaired loans with the associated allowance, if applicable, at December 31, 2020.
(Dollars in Thousands)Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Balance
Specific
Reserve
Loans without a Specific Valuation Allowance
Commercial Real Estate$3,236 $3,236 $— 
Construction55,248 55,248 — 
Residential Mortgages50,618 50,618 — 
Loans with a Specific Valuation Allowance
Commercial Real Estate24,430 24,430 13,773 
Commercial & Industrial— — — 
Construction1,739 1,739 1,477 
Total by Category
Commercial Real Estate27,666 27,666 13,773 
Commercial & Industrial— — — 
Construction56,987 56,987 1,477 
Residential Mortgages50,618 50,618 — 
Total Impaired Loans$135,271 $135,271 $15,250 
27

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (continued)
The following table presents the year-to-date average recorded investment and interest income recognized on individually evaluated loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020:
June 30, 2020Three Months Ended June 30, 2020Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Average Investment on Impaired LoansInterest Income RecognizedInterest Income Recognized
Loans without a Specific Valuation Allowance
Commercial Real Estate$3,816 $32 $64 
Construction5,247 — — 
Residential Mortgages— — — 
Loans with a Specific Valuation Allowance
Commercial Real Estate28,727 — — 
Commercial & Industrial307 — — 
Construction53,752 595 1,008 
Residential Mortgages52,099 428 1,048 
Total by Category
Commercial Real Estate32,543 32 64 
Commercial & Industrial307 — — 
Construction58,999 595 1,008 
Residential Mortgages52,099 428 1,048 
Total Impaired Loans$143,948 $1,055 $2,120 
NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets or liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. In determining fair value, we use various valuation approaches, including market, income and cost approaches. The fair value standard establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, which are developed based on market data we have obtained from independent sources. Unobservable inputs reflect our estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, which are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that an entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date, or observable inputs.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. We recognize transfers between any of the fair value hierarchy levels at the end of the reporting period in which the transfer occurred.
28

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (continued)
The following are descriptions of the valuation methodologies used for financial instruments recorded at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis.
Recurring Basis
Securities Available-for-Sale: The fair values of securities available-for-sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges, if available. This valuation method is classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated on market prices of similar securities, or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique, used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. Matrix pricing relies on the securities’ relationship to similarly traded securities, benchmark curves, and the benchmarking of like securities. Matrix pricing utilizes observable market inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, reference data, and industry and economic events. In instances where broker quotes are used, these quotes are obtained from market makers or broker-dealers recognized to be market participants. This valuation method is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators. This valuation method is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities: The Company uses derivative instruments such as interest rate swaps for commercial loans with our customers. Upon entering into swaps with the borrower, the Company entered into offsetting positions with counterparties to minimize risk to the Company. The back-to-back swaps qualify as derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments. Interest rate swap contracts involve the risk of dealing with borrower and counterparties and their ability to meet contractual terms. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is positive, this generally indicates that the counterparty or customer owes the Company, and results in credit risk to the Company. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is negative, the Company owes the customer or counterparty, and, therefore, has no risk.
The Company also enters into commitments to originate mortgage loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding (rate lock commitments). Rate lock commitments on mortgage loans to be held-for-sale are considered to be derivatives. The period of time between issuance of a loan commitment and closing and sale of the loan generally ranges from 15 to 90 days. The Company protects itself from changes in interest rates through the use of best efforts forward delivery commitments, whereby the Company commits to sell a loan at the time the borrower commits to an interest rate with the intent that the buyer has assumed interest rate risk on rate lock commitments dues to changes in interest rates.
Nonrecurring Basis
Individually Evaluated Loans: Individually evaluated loans with an outstanding balance greater than or equal to $1.0 million are evaluated for potential specific reserves and adjusted, if a shortfall exists, to fair value less costs to sell. Fair value is measured based on the value of the underlying collateral securing the loan if repayment is expected solely from the sale or operation of the collateral or present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the loan’s contractual interest rate if the loan is not determined to be collateral dependent. All loans with a specific reserve are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Fair value for individually evaluated loans is determined using several methods. Generally, the fair value of real estate is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. These routine adjustments are made to adjust the value of a specific property relative to comparable properties for variations in qualities such as location, size, and income production capacity relative to the subject property of the appraisal. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.
Subsequent to the initial impairment date, existing individually evaluated loans are reevaluated quarterly for additional impairment and adjustments to fair value less costs to sell are made, where appropriate. For individually evaluated loans, the first stage of our impairment analysis involves inspection of the property in question to affirm the condition has not deteriorated since the previous impairment analysis date. Management also engages in conversations with local real estate professionals and market participants to determine the likely marketing time and value range for the property. The second stage involves an
29

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (continued)
assessment of current trends in the regional market. After thorough consideration of these factors, management will order a new appraisal.
For non-individually evaluated loans, the fair value is determined by updating the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate to reflect the payment schedule for the remaining life of the loan.
OREO
OREO is evaluated at the time of acquisition and is recorded at fair value as determined by an appraisal or evaluation, less costs to sell. After acquisition, most OREO assets are revalued every twelve months, or more frequently when deemed necessary by management based upon changes in market or collateral conditions. For smaller OREO assets with existing carrying values less than $0.5 million, management may elect to re-value the assets, at minimum, once every twenty-four months based on the size of the exposure. At June 30, 2021 OREO assets were in compliance with the OREO policy as set forth above, and substantially all of the assets were listed for sale with credible third-party real estate brokers.
Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below for the periods presented:
June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Carrying
Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets
Securities Available-for-Sale$843,538 $4,440 $825,418 $13,680 
Derivatives2,774 — 2,774 — 
Total$846,312 $4,440 $828,192 $13,680 
Liabilities
Derivatives$2,884 $— $2,884 $— 
Total$2,884 $ $2,884 $ 
December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Carrying
Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets
Securities Available-for-Sale$778,679 $— $768,316 $10,363 
Derivatives4,493 — 4,493 — 
Total$783,172 $ $772,809 $10,363 
Liabilities
Derivatives$4,756 $— $4,756 $— 
Total$4,756 $ $4,756 $ 
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the six months ended June 30, 2021 or the year ended December 31, 2020.
We have invested in subordinated debt of other financial institutions. We have three securities totaling $13.7 million that are considered to be Level 3 securities at June 30, 2021 and two totaling $10.4 million at December 31, 2020. The change in the fair value of Level 3 securities available-for-sale from $10.4 million at December 31, 2020 to $13.7 million at June 30, 2021 is attributable to the calculated change in fair value as further detailed below as well as a new security in the second quarter of 2021 for $3.5 million. The Level 3 fair value is benchmarked to other securities that have observable market values in Level 2 using comparable financial ratio analysis specific to the industry in which the underlying company operates. The underwriting includes considerations of capital adequacy, asset quality trends, management’s ability to continue efficient and profitable
30

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (continued)
operations, and the institution’s core earnings ability, liquidity management platform and current on and off balance sheet interest rate risk exposures.
Financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below for the periods presented:
June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Level 1Level 2Level 3Fair Value
OREO$— $— $21,250 $21,250 
Individually Evaluated Loans$— $— $2,928 $2,928 
December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Level 1Level 2Level 3Fair Value
OREO$— $— $15,722 $15,722 
Impaired Loans$— $— $10,919 $10,919 
Individually evaluated loans had a net carrying amount of $2.9 million at June 30, 2021 with a valuation allowance of $1.9 million. Impaired loans had a net carrying amount of $10.9 million at December 31, 2020 with a valuation allowance of $15.3 million.
OREO, which is measured at the lower of carrying or fair value less costs to sell, had a net carrying amount of $21.3 million as of June 30, 2021, compared with $15.7 million at December 31, 2020. Write-downs of $3.2 million were recorded on OREO for the six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to $0.1 million for the same period in 2020.
The following table summarizes the Company’s assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for the periods presented:
June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Fair
Value
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable
Inputs
Weighted
Range
Average
Assets
Individually Evaluated Loans$2,698 Discounted AppraisalsEstimated Selling Costs & Qualitative Adjustments
12.0 – 50.0%
20.8 %
Individually Evaluated Loans230 Discounted AppraisalsEstimated Selling Costs20.9 %20.9 %
Total Individually Evaluated Loans$2,928 
Other Real Estate Owned$9,511 AppraisalsEstimated Selling Costs
6.0 – 10.0%
6.5 %
Other Real Estate Owned1,033 Discounted Cash FlowDiscount Rate6.3 %6.3 %
Other Real Estate Owned1,469 Internal ValuationsEstimated Selling Costs5.0 %5.0 %
Other Real Estate Owned9,237 Discounted Internal ValuationsManagement’s Discount & Estimated Selling Costs
0.0 % – 50.7%
2.4 %
Total Other Real Estate Owned$21,250 
31

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (continued)
December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Fair
Value
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable
Inputs
Weighted
Range
Average
Assets
Impaired Loans$1,163 Discounted AppraisalsEstimated Selling Costs43.0 %43.0 %
Impaired Loans9,494 Discounted AppraisalsEstimated Selling Costs & Qualitative Adjustments
12.0 – 50.0%
33.2 %
Impaired Loans262 Discounted AppraisalsEstimated Selling Costs20.9 %20.9 %
Total Impaired Loans$10,919 
Other Real Estate Owned$11,972 AppraisalsEstimated Selling Costs
6.0 – 10.0%
6.5 %
Other Real Estate Owned1,260 Discounted Cash FlowDiscount Rate6.3 %6.3 %
Other Real Estate Owned1,583 Internal ValuationsEstimated Selling Costs5.0 %5.0 %
Other Real Estate Owned907 Discounted Internal ValuationsManagement’s Discount & Estimated Selling Costs
33.7 – 73.5%
55.5 %
Total Other Real Estate Owned$15,722 
A baseline discount rate has been established for impairment measurement. This baseline discount rate was back tested against historical OREO sales and therefore represents an average recovery rate based on the transaction sizes and asset types in the population examined. Management considers the unique attributes and characteristics of each specific impaired loan and may use judgement to adjust the baseline discount rate when appropriate.
The carrying values and estimated fair values of our financial instruments at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 are presented in the following tables. Fair values for June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 are estimated under the exit price notion in accordance with ASU 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.”
GAAP requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments carried at book value on the consolidated balance sheet. in cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.
32

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (continued)
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Carrying ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Financial Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents$216,651 $41,850 $174,801 $— $216,651 
Securities Available-for-Sale843,538 4,440 825,418 13,680 843,538 
Loans Held-for-Sale9,311 — — 9,311 9,311 
Portfolio Loans, net2,807,335 — — 2,768,885 2,768,885 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, at Cost3,215 — — NANA
Other Assets- Interest Rate Derivatives2,774 — 2,774 — 2,774 
Accrued Interest Receivable31,619 17 2,998 28,604 31,619 
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits$3,659,341 $720,231 $1,481,942 $1,480,465 $3,682,638 
Other Liabilities- Interest Rate Derivatives2,884 — 2,884 — 2,884 
FHLB Borrowings30,000 — — 30,198 30,198 
Accrued Interest Payable1,691 — — 1,691 1,691 
 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Carrying ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Financial Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents$241,942 $38,535 $203,407 $— $241,942 
Securities Available-for-Sale778,679 — 768,316 10,363 778,679 
Loans Held-for-Sale25,437 — — 25,437 25,437 
Portfolio Loans, net2,893,096 — — 2,854,244 2,854,244 
Loans Held-for-Sale in Connection with Sale of Bank Branches, at the lower of cost or fair value9,835 — — 9,835 9,835 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, at Cost5,093 — — NANA
Other Assets- Interest Rate Derivatives4,493 — 4,493 — 4,493 
Accrued Interest Receivable32,157 — 2,887 29,270 32,157 
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits$3,599,911 $699,229 $1,285,912 $1,640,587 $3,625,728 
Deposits Held for Assumption in Connection with Sale of Bank Branches84,717 9,506 18,699 56,512 84,717 
Other Liabilities- Interest Rate Derivatives4,756 — 4,756 — 4,756 
FHLB Borrowings35,000 — — 35,461 35,461 
Accrued Interest Payable2,131 — — 2,131 2,131 
NOTE 7 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
In accordance with applicable accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging, all derivatives are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value. Interest rate swaps are contracts in which a series of interest rate flows (fixed and variable) are exchanged over a prescribed period. The notional amounts on which the interest payments are based are not exchanged. These derivative positions relate to transactions in which the Company enters into an interest rate swap with a commercial customer while at the same time entering into an offsetting interest rate swap with another financial institution, or counterparty. In connection with each transaction, the Company originates a floating rate loan to the customer at a notional amount. In turn, the customer contracts with the counterparty to swap the stream of cash flows associated with the floating interest rate loan with the Company for a stream of fixed interest rate cash flows based on the same notional amount as the Company’s loan. The transaction allows the customer to effectively convert a variable rate loan to a fixed rate loan with the Company receiving a variable rate. These agreements could have floors or caps on the contracted interest rates.
Pursuant to agreements with various financial institutions, the Company may receive collateral or may be required to post collateral based upon mark-to-market positions. Beyond unsecured threshold levels, collateral in the form of cash or securities may be made available to counterparties of interest rate swap transactions. Based upon current positions and related future collateral requirements relating to them, management believes any effect on our cash flow or liquidity position to be immaterial.
33

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 7 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES – (continued)
Derivatives contain an element of credit risk, the possibility that the Company will incur a loss because a counterparty, which may be a financial institution or a customer, fails to meet its contractual obligations. All derivative contracts with financial institutions may be executed only with counterparties approved by the Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”) and all derivatives with customers are approved by a team of qualified members from senior management who have been trained to understand the risk associated with interest rate swaps and have past industry experience. Interest rate swaps are considered derivatives but are not accounted for using hedge accounting. As such, changes in the estimated fair value of the derivatives are recorded in current earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The following table indicates the amounts representing the fair value of derivative assets and derivative liabilities for the periods presented:
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
Asset Derivatives (Included in Other Assets)
June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Number of TransactionsNotional AmountFair ValueNumber of TransactionsNotional AmountFair Value
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Interest Rate Lock Commitments – Mortgage Loans2$327 $1$151 $— 
Interest Rate Swap Contracts – Commercial Loans52330,726 2,772 38255,572 4,493 
Total Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments54$331,053 $2,774 39$255,723 $4,493 
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
Liability Derivatives (Included in Other Liabilities)
June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Number of TransactionsNotional AmountFair ValueNumber of TransactionsNotional AmountFair Value
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Forward Sale Contracts – Mortgage Loans2$327 $1$151 $— 
Interest Rate Swap Contracts – Commercial Loans52330,726 2,882 38255,572 4,756 
Total Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments54$331,053 $2,884 39$255,723 $4,756 
The following table indicates the income (loss) recognized in income on derivatives for the periods presented:
For the Three Months Ended June 30,For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)2021202020212020
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Interest Rate Lock Commitments – Mortgage Loans$$(5)$$
Forward Sale Contracts – Mortgage Loans(2)(2)(6)
Interest Rate Swap Contracts – Commercial Loans(276)(108)153 (199)
Total Derivative (Loss) Income$(276)$(108)$153 $(199)
Presenting offsetting derivatives that are subject to legally enforceable netting arrangements with the same party is permitted. For example, we may have a derivative asset and a derivative liability with the same counterparty to a swap transaction and are permitted to offset the asset position and the liability position resulting in a net presentation.
34

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 7 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES – (continued)
The following table indicates the gross amounts of commercial loan swap derivative assets and derivative liabilities, the amounts offset and the carrying values in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at the dates presented:
Asset Derivatives (Included in Other Assets)Liability Derivatives (Included in Other Liabilities)
(Dollars in Thousands)June 30,
2021
December 31,
2020
June 30,
2021
December 31,
2020
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Gross Amounts Recognized$2,772 $4,493 $2,882 $4,756 
Gross Amounts Offset— — — — 
Net Amounts Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets2,772 4,493 2,882 4,756 
Gross Amounts Not Offset (1)— — (1,310)(5,220)
Net Amount$2,772 $4,493 $1,572 $(464)
(1)Amounts represent collateral posted for the periods presented.

35

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 8 – FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BORROWINGS
Borrowings are an additional source of liquidity the Company. Federal Home Loan Bank, or (“FHLB”) borrowings were $30.0 million and $35.0 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. FHLB borrowings are fixed rate advances for various terms and are secured by a blanket lien on select residential mortgages, select multifamily loans, and select commercial real estate loans at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. Total loans pledged as collateral were $846.4 million and $804.2 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. There were no securities available-for-sale pledged as collateral at both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. The Company continues to methodically pledge additional eligible loans and expect continued progress in additional pledging throughout the year. The Company is eligible to borrow up to an additional $547.9 million based upon current qualifying collateral and has a maximum borrowing capacity of approximately $1.0 billion, or 25.0% of the Company’s assets, as of June 30, 2021. The Company had the capacity to borrow up to an additional $510.5 million from the FHLB at December 31, 2020.
The following table represents the balance of long-term borrowings and the weighted average interest rate as of the periods presented:
(Dollars in Thousands)June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
Long-term Borrowings$30,000 $35,000 
Weighted Average Interest Rate1.15 %1.13 %
Scheduled annual maturities and weighted average interest rates for FHLB borrowings for each of the five years subsequent to June 30, 2021 and thereafter are as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)BalanceWeighted
Average Rate
1 year$3,000 1.68 %
2 years14,000 1.09 %
3 years10,000 0.94 %
4 years3,000 1.63 %
5 years— — %
Thereafter— — %
Total FHLB Borrowings$30,000 1.15 %
NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments to extend credit, which amounted to $460.2 million at June 30, 2021 and $591.2 million at December 31, 2020, represent agreements to lend to customers with fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. The Company provides lines of credit to our clients to finance the completion of construction projects and revolving lines of credit to operating companies to finance their working capital needs. Lines of credit for construction projects represent $284.6 million, or 61.8%, and $391.4 million, or 66.2%, of the commitments to extend credit at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company guaranteeing the performance of a customer to a third-party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $31.4 million at June 30, 2021 and $29.3 million at December 31, 2020.
Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and unconditional obligations as it does for on balance sheet instruments. Unless noted otherwise, collateral or other security is required to support financial instruments with credit risk.
Life-of-Loss Reserve on Unfunded Loan Commitments
We maintain a life-of-loss reserve on unfunded commercial lending commitments and letters of credit to provide for the risk of loss inherent in these arrangements. The life-of-loss reserve is computed using a methodology similar to that used to determine the ACL for loans, modified to take into account the probability of a draw-down on the commitment. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2021 are presented under Topic 326, while prior period amounts continue to be reported in
36

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
other expense on our Consolidated Statements of Income. The life-of-loss reserve for unfunded commitments is included in other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The activity in the life-of-loss reserve on unfunded loan commitments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 were as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
Life-of-Loss Reserve on Unfunded Loan Commitments
March 31, 2021$2,770 
Provision for unfunded commitments(603)
June 30, 2021$2,167 
(Dollars in Thousands)Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
Life-of-Loss Reserve on Unfunded Loan Commitments
Balance at beginning of period$144 
Impact of Adopting ASU 2016-132,908 
January 1, 2021$3,052 
Provision for unfunded commitments(885)
June 30, 2021$2,167 
Our life-of-loss reserve for unfunded commitments is determined using a methodology similar to that used to determine the ACL. Amounts are added to the provision for unfunded commitments through a charge to current earnings in the provision for unfunded commitments. The provision for unfunded commitments was a release of $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021.
Litigation
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to various legal and administrative proceedings and claims. Legal and administrative proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings could occur, and the timing and outcome of any legal or administrative proceeding cannot be predicted with certainty. Other than as set forth below, as of June 30, 2021, the Company is not involved in any other material pending legal proceedings other than proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business.
On May 31, 2021, the Bank and its directors were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia by James C. Justice, II, Cathy L. Justice, James C. Justice, III and various related entities that he and/or they own and control (such entities, the “Justice Entities” and collectively, the “Plaintiffs”). The allegations contained in the lawsuit relate to a series of loans (the “Loans”) made by the Bank to certain Justice Entities that are secured by collateral pledged by certain Justice Entities and are backed by personal guarantees from James C. Justice, II and Cathy L. Justice and, in certain cases, by personal guarantees from James C. Justice, III. In the lawsuit the Plaintiffs allege that the Bank (i) breached an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (ii) breached fiduciary duties of care and loyalty, and (iii) violated anti-tying restrictions of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and allege that the Bank’s directors aided and abetted breaches of fiduciary duties of care and loyalty by the Bank. The Plaintiffs seek monetary damages of $421 million, additional punitive damages and interest on damages as allowed by law, payment of costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees, and a declaratory judgment from the court that certain confessions of judgment, release and affirmation agreements, and forbearance agreements executed by the Plaintiffs in favor of the Bank and relating to the Loans and/or their origination, extension, restructuring or forbearance, are unenforceable.
On July 14, 2021, the Bank filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit for improper venue or, in the alternative, to transfer the lawsuit from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia (the “WDVA”), including on the grounds that Plaintiffs executed approximately 90 documents between 2017 and 2020 that contain forum selection clauses that mandate either the WDVA or the Circuit Court in the City of Martinsville, Virginia as the exclusive forum to adjudicate disputes arising from the lending relationship between the Bank and the Plaintiffs. Also, on July 14, 2021, the Bank’s directors filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit for lack of personal jurisdiction, including because the complaint contains no allegations that tie any of the Bank’s directors to West Virginia. Both motions are pending.
37

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company and the Bank deny the allegations contained in the lawsuit and intend to vigorously defend the matter and the validity of the confessions of judgment, release and affirmation agreements and forbearance agreements. Based on information presently available to the Company and the Bank and based on consultation with legal counsel, the Company believes that the Bank has meritorious defenses to all allegations contained in the lawsuit.
At this early stage of the lawsuit, the Company is not yet able to make a determination as to the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in this matter or to estimate the range of any possible loss.
NOTE 10 – TAX EFFECTS ON OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following table presents the change in components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the periods presented, net of tax effects:

Three Months Ended June 30, 2021Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Pre-Tax AmountTax (Expense) BenefitNet of Tax AmountPre-Tax AmountTax (Expense) BenefitNet of Tax Amount
Net Unrealized Gains Arising during the period$8,456 $(1,776)$6,680 $14,422 $(3,029)$11,393 
Reclassification Adjustment for Gains included in Net Income(1,499)315 (1,184)(2,321)488 (1,833)
Other Comprehensive Income $6,957 $(1,461)$5,496 $12,101 $(2,541)$9,560 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)Pre-Tax AmountTax BenefitNet of Tax AmountPre-Tax AmountTax (Expense) BenefitNet of Tax Amount
Net Unrealized (Losses) Gains Arising during the period$(2,038)$428 $(1,610)$16,426 $(3,449)$12,977 
Reclassification Adjustment for Gains included in Net Income(5,109)1,073 (4,036)(3,535)742 (2,793)
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income$(7,147)$1,501 $(5,646)$12,891 $(2,707)$10,184 


38

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), represents an overview of our consolidated results of operations and financial condition and highlights material changes in our financial condition and results of operations as of and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020. Our MD&A should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto. The results of operations reported in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future periods.
Important Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains or incorporates statements that we believe are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements related to the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential impact on the Company, its markets and its customers, potential asset quality developments, and the Company’s efficiency initiatives, pending branch sales, and deferral programs and may otherwise relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, outlook for earnings, revenues, expenses, capital and liquidity levels and ratios, asset levels, asset quality, financial position, litigation to which the Company is a party and the potential impacts thereof, and other matters regarding or affecting the Company and its future business and operations. Forward looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as “will likely result,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “intend,” “ believe,” “assume,” “strategy,” “trend,” “plan,” “outlook,” “outcome,” “continue,” “remain,” “potential,” “opportunity,” “believe,” “comfortable,” “current,” “position,” “maintain,” “sustain,” “seek,” “achieve” and variations of such words and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as will, would, should, could or may. Although we believe the assumptions upon which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of these assumptions could prove to be inaccurate and the forward-looking statements based on these assumptions could be incorrect. The matters discussed in these forward-looking statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results and trends to differ materially from those made, projected, or implied in or by the forward-looking statements depending on a variety of uncertainties or other factors including, but not limited to: changes in accounting policies, practices, or guidance, including for example, our adoption of Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”); technological risks and developments; cyber-security, threats, attacks or events; rapid technological developments and changes; the Company’s liquidity and capital positions; the potential adverse effects of unusual and infrequently occurring events, such as weather-related disasters, terrorist acts or public health events (such as the current COVID-19 pandemic), and of governmental and societal responses thereto; these potential adverse effects may include, without limitation, adverse effects on the ability of the Company's borrowers to satisfy their obligations to the Company, on the value of collateral securing loans, on the demand for the Company's loans or its other products and services, on incidents of cyberattack and fraud, on the Company’s liquidity or capital positions, on risks posed by reliance on third-party service providers, on other aspects of the Company's business operations and on financial markets and economic growth; the effect of steps the Company takes or has taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the severity and duration of the pandemic, the uncertainty regarding new variants of COVID-19 that have emerged, the speed and efficacy of vaccine and treatment developments, the impact of loosening or tightening of government restrictions, the pace of economic recovery when the pandemic subsides and the heightened impact it has on exacerbation of many of the risks described herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020; legislative or regulatory changes and requirements, including the impact of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, of 2021 (the “CAA”), and other legislative and regulatory reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic; potential claims, damages, and fines related to litigation or government actions, including litigation or actions arising from the Company’s participation in and administration of programs related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including, among other things, under the CARES Act, as amended by the CAA; sensitivity to the interest rate environment including a prolonged period of low interest rates, a rapid increase in interest rates or a change in the shape of the yield curve; a change in spreads on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; regulatory supervision and oversight; legislation affecting the financial services industry as a whole, and the Company, in particular; the outcome of pending and future litigation and governmental proceedings; increasing price and product/service competition; the ability to continue to introduce competitive new products and services on a timely, cost-effective basis; the Company’s strategic branch network optimization plan; managing our internal growth and acquisitions; the possibility that the anticipated benefits from acquisitions cannot be fully realized in a timely manner or at all, or that integrating the acquired operations will be more difficult, disruptive or more costly than anticipated; containing costs and expenses; reliance on significant customer relationships; credit losses; general economic or business conditions; deterioration of the housing market and reduced demand for mortgages; deterioration in the overall macroeconomic conditions or the state of the banking industry that could impact the re-emergence of turbulence in significant portions of the global financial and real estate markets that could impact our performance, both directly, by affecting our revenues and the value of our assets and liabilities, and indirectly, by affecting the economy generally and access to capital in the amounts, at the times and on the terms required to support our future businesses. Many of these factors, as well as other factors, are described throughout this Quarterly Report, including and in Part I, Item 1A,
39

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
“Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 and any of our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or (“SEC”). Forward-looking statements are based on beliefs and assumptions using information available at the time the statements are made. We caution you not to unduly rely on forward-looking statements because the assumptions, beliefs, expectations and projections about future events may, and often do, differ materially from actual results. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as to the date on which it is made, and we undertake no obligation to update, revise or clarify any forward-looking statement to reflect developments occurring after the statement is made.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our critical accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2021 have remained unchanged from the disclosures presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 under the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” except we have updated our allowance for credit losses (ACL) policy and included required disclosures in response to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Please refer to the CECL disclosure contained in Notes 1 and 5 to the financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Overview
Carter Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Martinsville, Virginia with assets of $4.1 billion at June 30, 2021. The Company is the parent company of its wholly owned subsidiary, Carter Bank & Trust (the “Bank”). The Bank is an insured, Virginia state-chartered bank, which operates branches in Virginia and North Carolina. The Company provides a full range of financial services with retail, and commercial banking products and insurance. Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol “CARE.”
The Company earns revenue primarily from interest on loans and securities and fees charged for financial services provided to our customers. The Company incurs expenses for the cost of deposits, provision for credit losses and other operating costs such as salaries and employee benefits, data processing, occupancy and tax expense.
Our mission is that the Company strives to be the preferred lifetime financial partner for our customers and shareholders, and the employer of choice in the communities the Company is privileged to serve. Our strategic plan focuses on restructuring the balance sheet to provide more diversification and higher yielding assets to increase the net interest margin. Another area of focus is the transformation of the infrastructure of the Company to provide a foundation for operational efficiency and provide new products and services for our customers that will ultimately increase noninterest income.
Our focus continues to be on loan and deposit growth with a shift in the composition of deposits to more low cost core deposits with less dependence in higher cost certificates of deposits (“CDs”), as well as, implementing opportunities to increase fee income while closely monitoring our operating expenses. The Company is focused on executing our strategy to successfully build our brand and grow our business in our markets.
COVID-19
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020. The CARES Act is an emergency stimulus measure providing assistance and relief in a variety of ways to certain individuals, businesses, and industries. The CARES Act established a $2 trillion economic stimulus package, including cash payments to individuals, supplemental unemployment insurance benefits and a $349 billion loan program administered through the Small Business Administration (“SBA”), referred to as the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). In addition to the general impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the Company, certain provisions of the CARES Act, as well as other legislative and regulatory relief efforts, may have a material impact on our operations. The full extent of these impacts at the date of this filing is unknown; however, we have disclosed the material items of which we are aware.
Many of the CARES Act’s programs are dependent upon the direct involvement of U.S. financial institutions and will be implemented through rules and guidance adopted by federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB” or “Federal
40

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
Reserve”) and other federal bank regulatory authorities, including those with direct supervisory jurisdiction over the Company and the Bank.
Set forth below is a brief overview of certain provisions of the CARES Act and certain other regulations and supervisory guidance related to the COVID-19 pandemic that are applicable to the operations and activities of the Company. The following description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the CARES Act and the statutes, regulations, and policies described herein. Such statutes, regulations, and policies are subject to ongoing review by U.S. Congress and federal regulatory authorities. Future amendments to the provisions of the CARES Act or changes to any of the statutes, regulations, or regulatory policies applicable to the Bank could have a material effect on the Bank. The Bank will continue to assess the impact of the CARES Act and other statutes, regulations and supervisory guidance related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
FRB Reserve Programs and Initiatives
The CARES Act encourages the FRB, in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury, to establish or implement various programs to help midsize businesses, nonprofits, and municipalities, including (i) a Midsize Business/Nonprofit Organization Program to provide financing to banks and other lenders to make direct loans to eligible businesses and nonprofit organizations with between 500 and 10,000 employees and (ii) the Municipal Liquidity Facility, provide liquidity to the financial system that supports states and municipalities. On April 9, 2020, the FRB announced and solicited comments regarding the Main Street Lending Program, which would implement certain of these recommendations.
Separately, and in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the FRB’s Federal Open Market Committee (the “FOMC”) has set the federal funds target rate – i.e., the interest rate at which depository institutions such as the Company lend reserve balances to other depository institutions overnight on an uncollateralized basis – to a historic low. On March 16, 2020, the FOMC set the federal funds target rate at 0-0.25%. Consistent with FRB policy, the FRB has committed to the use of overnight reverse repurchase agreements as a supplementary policy tool, as necessary, to help control the federal funds rate and keep it in the target range set by the FOMC.
In addition, the FRB has expanded the size and scope of three existing programs to mitigate the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: (i) the Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility; (ii) the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility; and (iii) the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility. The FRB has also established two new program facilities – the Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility and the Commercial Paper Funding Facility – to broaden its support for the flow of credit to households and businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Temporary Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) Reporting Relief
The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) has provided targeted relief from certain BSA reporting requirements and have provided updated guidance to financial institutions on complying with such requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, FinCEN has (i) granted targeted relief to financial institutions participating in the PPP, stating that PPP loans to existing customers will not require reverification under applicable BSA requirements, unless reverification is otherwise required under the financial institution’s risk-based BSA compliance program, (ii) acknowledged that there may be “reasonable delays in compliance” due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and (iii) temporarily suspended implementation of its February 2020 ruling, which would have entailed significant changes to currency transaction reporting filing requirements for transactions involving sole proprietorships and entities operating under a “doing business as” or other assumed name.
The Company’s Response to COVID-19
Lending Operations
The Company elected to take advantage of Section 4014 of the CARES Act provision to temporarily delay adoption of the CECL methodology. The Company was subject to the adoption of the CECL accounting method under the FASB ASU 2016-03 and related amendments, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) on January 1, 2020 and has since implemented CECL January 1, 2021. Refer to Note 1, Basis of Presentation and Note 5 Allowance for Credit Losses, of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial statements for additional disclosures related to CECL.
41

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
The Company quickly responded to the pandemic and the CARES Act, offering the option of payment deferrals, participation in the PPP, fee waivers and other relief actions to customers. Banks have been identified as essential services and have remained open during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since April 28, 2021, all of the Company’s branch lobbies are open. Every opportunity is being taken to protect both customers and employees through enhanced cleaning services, social distancing and personal protective equipment requirements for both. Approximately 20% of the Company’s workforce is working remotely.
Under the CARES Act, the PPP is an amendment to a program administered as part of the Small Business Administration’s (“SBA”) 7-A loan program. The Company became an approved SBA 7A lender in November 2019. The PPP is a guaranteed, unsecured loan program created to fund certain payroll and operating costs of eligible businesses, organizations and self-employed persons during the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, $349 billion was approved and designated for the PPP in order for the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) to guarantee 100% of collective loans made under the program to eligible small businesses, nonprofits, veteran’s organizations, and tribal businesses. The Company participated in the initial round of funding through a referral relationship with a third-party, non-bank lender. When an additional $310 billion in funds were approved and designated for the PPP, we opted to set up an internal, automated loan process utilizing our core system provider. As of June 30, 2021 we processed either through a third-party or internally 1,102 PPP loans totaling $68.9 million, represented by $17.9 million processed in rounds one and two related to loans approved that were referred to an online small business lender, $39.9 million processed in rounds one and two and $11.1 million in round three. The Company has continued making PPP loans pursuant to the additional PPP authorization that was contained in the December 2020 COVID-19 relief law.
The FRB implemented a liquidity facility available to financial institutions participating in the PPP. However, we opted to fund all PPP loans through our internal liquidity sources. These loans are fully guaranteed by the SBA and do not represent a credit risk. We expect the vast majority of these PPP loans will be forgiven based upon a preliminary review of the loans. As of June 30, 2021, the Company thus far has had 361 loans totaling $29.6 million fully forgiven by the SBA.
The Company provided deferrals to customers under Section 4013 of the CARES Act and regulatory interagency statements on loan modifications. The Company launched successive deferral programs with short-term expirations. The Part I program was launched in March 2020 and expired at the end of August 2020. The deferrals in Part I typically provided deferral of both principal and interest through the expiry. The Part II program was launched in July 2020 and expired at the end of December 2020. The deferrals in this program were needs based and required the collection of updated financial information and in certain situations, the validation of liquidity to support the business. Prior to the extension of the CARES Act, the Company launched the Part III program that offered borrowers in the Part II program an extension of deferrals through June 2021. Borrowers who opted into the Part III program were required to provide monthly financial statements and remit payments on a quarterly basis based on excess cash flows (“recapture payment”), if any, up to their otherwise contractual payment. In the quarter ended March 31, 2021 recapture payments due from deferral clients totaled $2.2 million and the Bank has collected $1.8 million to date. The second quarter 2021 recapture payments are in the process of being determined. At the end of these deferral periods, for term loans, payments will be applied to accrued interest first and will resume principal payments once accrued interest is current. Deferred principal will be due at maturity. For interest only loans, such as lines of credit, deferred interest will be due at maturity. At June 30, 2021, Part III of the program expired and we expect the majority of our clients to resume regularly scheduled payments.
Our interest income could be reduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In keeping with guidance from regulators, we are actively working with borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic to defer their payments, interest, and fees. Interest and fees will still accrue to income through normal GAAP accounting. Should eventual credit losses on these deferred payments emerge, interest income and fees accrued would need to be reversed. In such a scenario, interest income in future periods could be negatively impacted. At this time, we are unable to project the significance of such an impact, but recognize the breadth of the economic impact may affect our borrowers’ ability to repay in future periods.
Our exposure to hospitality at June 30, 2021 equated to approximately $486.4 million, or 16.7% of total portfolio loans. These were mostly loans secured by upscale or top tier flagged hotels, which have historically exhibited low leverage and strong operating cash flows. However, we anticipate that a significant portion of our borrowers in the hotel industry will continue to operate at occupancy levels at or below breakeven which has caused, or will cause, them to draw on their existing lines of credit with other financial institutions or other sources of liquidity and may adversely affect their ability to repay existing indebtedness. These developments, together with the current economic conditions generally, may adversely impact the value of real estate collateral in hospitality and other commercial real estate exposure. These risk considerations were factored into qualitative adjustments included in the ACL. As a result, we anticipate that our financial condition, capital levels and results of operations could be adversely affected.
42

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
Retail Operations
The Company continues to promote digital banking options through our website. Customers are encouraged to utilize online and mobile banking tools and our customer contact center for personal and automated telephone banking services. Retail branches are staffed and available to assist customers by offering lobby appointments, drive-up and virtual servicing.
In March 2020, we closed all branch lobbies to customer activity, offering drive-up and appointment only services. On October 31, 2020, we opened 36 branch lobbies and as of April 28, 2021, we opened our remaining branch lobbies. Retail leadership continues to monitor branch traffic and local conditions daily and makes adjustments as needed. All branches are equipped with video conferencing and online tools that enable virtual servicing. We continue to pay all employees according to their normal work schedule, even if their hours have been reduced. No employees have been furloughed. Employees whose job responsibilities can be effectively carried out remotely are working from home. Employees whose critical duties require their continued presence on-site are utilizing personal protection equipment and observing social distancing and cleaning protocols.
Our fee income for 2020 was negatively impacted due to COVID-19 by approximately $1.5 million. Beginning on July 20, 2020, certain account fees were reinstated. In keeping with guidance from regulators, we actively worked with customers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic to waive fees from a variety of sources, such as, but not limited to, insufficient funds and overdraft fees and account maintenance fees. As of June 30, 2021 we had no fee waivers specific to the COVID-19 pandemic. We believe these reductions in fees were temporary.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
As of June 30, 2021, all of the Company’s capital ratios were in excess of all regulatory requirements. The economic recession brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic has improved during the first six months of 2021.
We maintain access to multiple sources of liquidity. Funding sources accessible to the Company include borrowing availability at the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), equal to 25.0% of the Company’s assets approximating $1.0 billion, subject to the amount of eligible collateral pledged, and of which $547.9 million remains available at June 30, 2021, federal funds unsecured lines with six other correspondent financial institutions in the amount of $145.0 million and access to the institutional CD market through brokered CDs. In addition to the above resources, the Company also has $697.6 million of unpledged available-for-sale securities as an additional source of liquidity at June 30, 2021. If an extended recession caused large numbers of our deposit customers to withdraw their funds, we might become more reliant on volatile or more expensive sources of funding.
The Company is monitoring and will continue to monitor the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and has taken and will continue to take steps to mitigate the potential risks and impact on our liquidity and capital resources. Due to the economic uncertainty, we are taking a prudent approach to capital management and have established access to the FRB’s PPP Lending Facility.
Earnings Summary
Net income increased $1.0 million, or 21.9%, and $5.9 million, or 66.8%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020. Net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 was $5.4 million and $14.8 million, or $0.21 and $0.56 diluted earnings per share, respectively, compared to net income of $4.5 million and $8.9 million, or $0.17 and $0.34 diluted earnings per share, respectively, for the same periods in 2020. The increase in net income for the three months ended June 30, 2021 of $1.0 million was due to lower provision for credit losses of $4.5 million as well as the release of $0.6 million for the provision for unfunded commitments, a $1.0 million increase in noninterest income and an increase in net interest income of $0.9 million offset by an increase in noninterest expense of $4.7 million and higher provision for income taxes of $1.4 million. The increase in net income for the six months ended June 30, 2021 of $5.9 million was due to lower provision for credit losses of $7.4 million, as well as, the release of $0.9 million for the provision for unfunded commitments, and increases of $3.2 million in noninterest income and $0.2 million in net interest income offset by higher noninterest expenses of $3.7 million and an increase in the provision for income taxes of $2.1 million.
Net interest income increased $0.9 million, or 3.6%, to $27.2 million and increased $0.2 million, or 0.4%, to $53.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020. Net interest margin decreased one basis point and 11 basis points to 2.75% and 2.74% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to 2.76% and 2.85% for the same periods in 2020. These impacts were primarily due to the lower yields
43

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
on interest-earning assets, offset by a decline in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent (“FTE”) basis (non-GAAP), decreased four and 14 basis points to 2.79% and 2.78% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to 2.83% and 2.92% for the same periods in 2020. The decreases in short-term interest rates had a negative impact on both net interest income and the net interest margin, but continues to be offset by lower cost of funds. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased 43 and 57 basis points for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, partially offset by 47 and 52 basis points reduction in funding costs compared to the same periods in 2020. Net interest margin is reconciled to net interest income adjusted to an FTE basis in the “Net Interest Income” section of the “Results of Operations - Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 in this MD&A. Also refer to the “Explanation of Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional discussion of the non-GAAP measures.
The provision for credit losses decreased $4.5 million and $7.4 million to $1.0 million and $2.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to $5.5 million and $10.3 million for the same periods in 2020. Provision for credit losses during the second quarter of 2021 was primarily driven by the release of $4.8 million of specific reserves in connection with the resolution of our two largest nonperforming relationships, offset by an increase to the CECL model to account for uncertainty in credit quality with respect to loans in the “Other” loan segment. These resolutions contributed to net charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30, 2021 totaling $8.5 million; however, $13.1 million was previously reserved. The provision for credit losses also decreased due to qualitative adjustments of $2.6 million in the second quarter of 2020 for the decline in economic and market conditions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The first six months of 2021 provision for credit losses was primarily driven by adjustments to the CECL model to account for additional expected deterioration in credit quality with respect to loans on deferral. Management reviews and analyzes the monthly operating statements of commercial clients in the deferral program. During the first six months of 2021, management observed continued deterioration on a loan in deferral with an aggregate principal balance of $8.1 million that was not previously recognized in the Day 1 model. This adjustment resulted in additional reserves of $1.5 million during the first quarter of 2021.
Prior to the adoption of CECL at January 1, 2021, the life-of-loss reserves on unfunded commitments was a component of noninterest expense and has not been reclassified for comparable periods. The life-of-loss reserves on unfunded commitments totaled $2.2 million at June 30, 2021.
Net charge-offs were $8.5 million and $9.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to $1.0 million and $1.6 million for the same periods in 2020. As a percentage of average portfolio loans, on an annualized basis, net charge-offs were 1.15% and 0.63% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to 0.14% and 0.11% for the same periods in 2020. At June 30, 2021, nonperforming loans decreased $22.4 million to $9.6 million, compared to $32.0 million at December 31, 2020. The decline is due to the aforementioned resolution of our two largest nonperforming credits during the second quarter of 2021 which resulted in net charge-offs of $6.3 million and $1.9 million, respectively, of which $13.1 million was previously reserved. Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total portfolio loans were 0.33%, 1.09% and 1.37% as of June 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020, respectively.
Total noninterest income increased $1.0 million and $3.2 million to $7.2 million and $16.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to $6.2 million and $13.0 million for the same periods in 2020. The increase of $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same period in 2020 was primarily the result of increases of $1.3 million in service charges on deposit accounts due to reinstating fees that we previously waived during 2020 for customers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, a premium of $0.5 million on the sale of four bank branches included in other income, and higher debit card interchange fees of $0.4 million due to usage. These increases were offset by declines in net security gains of $0.8 million, lower commercial loan swap fee income of $0.4 million and lower gains on other real estate owned (“OREO”) of $0.1 million. The fluctuations of commercial loan swap fee income were due to the timing and demand for this product in the current low interest rate environment.
The increase of $3.2 million in total noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same period in 2020 was driven by the same variances as the second quarter period with higher net security gains of $1.6 million, service charges on deposit accounts increasing $1.5 million, debit card interchange fees up $1.0 million, a year-to-date premium of $0.5 million on the sale of four bank branches included in other income, offset by lower commercial loan swap fee income of $0.6 million and lower gains on OREO of $0.1 million. However, for the six months ended June 30, 2021, insurance commissions declined $1.0 million compared to the prior year period. The increase in security gains of $1.6 million for the six months ended
44

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
June 30, 2021, to $5.1 million, compared to $3.5 million for the same period in 2020 was due to the Company taking advantage of market opportunities, and repositioning and diversifying holdings in its securities portfolio.
Total noninterest expense increased $4.7 million and $3.7 million to $27.8 million and $51.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to $23.0 million and $47.6 million for the same periods in 2020. The primary driver of the increase for both the three and six month periods was the nonrecurring write-down of $3.0 million for closed bank branches. These branches were closed in the second quarter of 2021, transferred to OREO and marketed for sale resulting in the $3.0 million nonrecurring write-down. Other variances for the three-month period ended June 30, 2021 were higher salaries and employee benefits $1.2 million due to increased medical expenses for several large critical illness claims and a $0.4 million nonrecurring severance and stay bonus for impacted employees from the branch closures in the second quarter of 2021. Also offsetting the three-month increase was $0.4 million unfunded loan commitment expense, $0.4 million in data processing expenses due to new products and $0.2 million in tax credit amortization. The $0.4 million decline in unfunded loan commitment expense is a result of the adoption of CECL as unfunded loan commitment expense is now recorded as part of provision for credit losses instead of noninterest expense.
Along with the above mentioned nonrecurring write-down for closed bank branches, total noninterest expense increases during the six months ended June 30, 2021 included $0.8 million higher professional and legal fees, $0.8 million higher data processing expenses due to an increase in customer accounts and new modules added to our core processor, $0.3 million increase in the amortization of tax credits, $0.3 million in occupancy expenses. These increases were offset by decreases of $0.6 million in advertising expenses due to the sunset of our deposit acquisition strategy in the fourth quarter of 2020, lower unfunded loan commitment expense of $0.6 million and a $0.5 million decrease in other noninterest expense.
The provision for income taxes increased $1.4 million and $2.1 million to $0.9 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to tax benefits of $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the same periods in 2020. Pretax income increased $2.4 million and $8.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020. Our effective tax rate was 14.0% and 10.9% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to negative 12.3% and negative 2.8% for the same periods in 2020. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to a higher level of pretax income, offset by a lower level of tax-exempt interest income. The Company ordinarily generates an annual effective tax rate that is less than the statutory rate of 21% due to benefits resulting from tax-exempt interest income, tax credit projects and Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”), which are relatively consistent regardless of the level of pretax income.
Explanation of Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to the results of operations presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States, management uses, and this quarterly report references net interest income and net interest margin on a FTE basis, each of which is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management believes these non-GAAP financial measures provide information useful to investors in understanding our underlying business, operational performance and performance trends as it facilitates comparisons with the performance of other companies in the financial services industry. Although management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures enhance an investor’s understanding of our business and performance, these non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered an alternative to financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP or considered to be more important than financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to similar non-GAAP financial measures which may be presented by us or other companies.
The Company believes the presentation of net interest income on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) ensures the comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources and we believe is consistent with industry practice. Net interest income is reconciled to net interest income adjusted to an FTE basis (non-GAAP) in the Net Interest Income section of the "Results of Operations – Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2020."


45

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Net Interest Income
Our principal source of revenue is net interest income. Net interest income represents the difference between the interest and fees earned on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is affected by changes in the average balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and changes in interest rates and spreads. The level and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is managed by our Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”), in order to mitigate interest rate and liquidity risks of the balance sheet. A variety of ALCO strategies were implemented, within prescribed ALCO risk parameters, to produce what the Company believes is an acceptable level of net interest income.
Net interest income and the net interest margin are presented on an FTE basis (non-GAAP). The FTE basis (non-GAAP) adjusts net interest income and net interest margin for the tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and securities using the applicable federal statutory tax rate for each period (which was 21% for the periods presented) and the dividend-received deduction for equity securities. The Company believes this FTE basis (non-GAAP)presentation provides a relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable sources of interest income. Refer to the “Explanation of Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for additional discussion of non-GAAP measures.
Total net interest income increased $0.9 million, or 3.6%, to $27.2 million, and $0.2 million, or 0.4%, to $53.7 million, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to $26.3 million and $53.5 million for the same periods in 2020. These increases were primarily due to the increase in the volume of interest-earning assets, offset by the decline in the interest rate environment. Net interest income, on an FTE basis (non-GAAP), increased $0.7 million, or 2.6%, to $27.6 million and decreased $0.2 million, or 0.3%, to $54.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to $26.9 million and $54.8 million for the same periods in 2020. The increase in net interest income, on an FTE basis (non-GAAP), was driven by $2.8 million and $7.8 million decreases in interest income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020, partially offset by $3.5 million and $7.6 million decreases in interest expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020. Net interest margin decreased one basis point and 11 basis points to 2.75% and 2.74% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to 2.76% and 2.85% for the same periods in 2020. These impacts were primarily due to the lower yields on interest-earning assets, offset by a decline in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest margin, on an FTE basis (non-GAAP), decreased four basis points and 14 basis points to 2.79% and 2.78% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to 2.83% and 2.92% for the same periods in 2020, primarily due to the lower interest rate environment. The lower interest rate environment and the intentional runoff of higher cost CDs has significantly contributed to lower the overall cost of funds.
The following table reconciles net interest income per the Consolidated Statements of Income to net interest income on an FTE basis, and net interest margin to net interest margin on an FTE basis (non-GAAP), for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)2021202020212020
Total Interest Income$33,094 $35,617 $66,051 $73,453 
Total Interest Expense5,891 9,355 12,319 19,927 
Net Interest Income per Consolidated Statements of Net Income27,203 26,262 53,732 53,526 
Adjustment to FTE Basis386 626 848 1,227 
Net Interest Income (FTE)(non-GAAP)$27,589 $26,888 $54,580 $54,753 
Net Interest Margin2.75 %2.76 %2.74 %2.85 %
Adjustment to FTE Basis0.04 %0.07 %0.04 %0.07 %
Net Interest Margin (FTE)(non-GAAP)2.79 %2.83 %2.78 %2.92 %
46

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
Average Balance Sheet and Net Interest Income Analysis (FTE)
The following table provides information regarding the average balances, interest and rates earned on interest-earning assets and the average balances, interest and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)
Average Balance(3)
Income/ ExpenseRateAverage BalanceIncome/ ExpenseRate
ASSETS
Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks$190,851 $56 0.12 %$106,710 $26 0.10 %
Tax-Free Investment Securities(2)
33,027 273 3.32 %49,633 416 3.37 %
Taxable Investment Securities765,286 3,138 1.64 %685,468 3,594 2.11 %
Total Securities798,313 3,411 1.71 %735,101 4,010 2.19 %
Tax-Free Loans(1)(2)
197,393 1,565 3.18 %322,739 2,563 3.19 %
Taxable Loans(1)
2,782,802 28,417 4.10 %2,651,873 29,577 4.49 %
Total Loans2,980,195 29,982 4.04 %2,974,612 32,140 4.35 %
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock3,215 31 3.87 %5,093 67 5.29 %
Total Interest-Earning Assets3,972,574 $33,480 3.38 %3,821,516 $36,243 3.81 %
Noninterest Earning Assets170,885 288,435 
Total Assets$4,143,459 $4,109,951 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-Bearing Demand$404,084 $234 0.23 %$297,815 $242 0.33 %
Money Market351,820 305 0.35 %183,542 211 0.46 %
Savings657,803 169 0.10 %592,193 157 0.11 %
Certificates of Deposit1,512,923 5,052 1.34 %1,845,294 8,627 1.88 %
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits$2,926,630 $5,760 0.79 %$2,918,844 $9,237 1.27 %
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings30,000 91 1.22 %35,000 100 1.15 %
Other Borrowings3,514 40 4.57 %1,245 18 5.81 %
Total Borrowings33,514 131 1.57 %36,245 118 1.31 %
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities2,960,144 5,891 0.80 %2,955,089 9,355 1.27 %
Noninterest-bearing Liabilities790,537 673,815 
Shareholders' Equity392,778 481,047 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity$4,143,459 $4,109,951 
Net Interest Income(2)
$27,589 $26,888 
Net Interest Margin(2)
2.79 %2.83 %
(1)Nonaccruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding.
(2)Tax-exempt income is on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) using the statutory federal corporate income tax rate of 21 percent.
(3)Loan and deposit balances include held-for-assumption transactions in connection with sale of Bank branches.
47

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)
Average Balance(3)
Income/ ExpenseRateAverage BalanceIncome/ ExpenseRate
ASSETS
Interest-Bearing Deposits with Banks$182,835 $106 0.12 %$84,836 $236 0.56 %
Tax-Free Investment Securities(2)
42,256 685 3.27 %35,543 620 3.51 %
Taxable Investment Securities736,926 6,125 1.68 %698,786 8,096 2.33 %
Total Securities779,182 6,810 1.76 %734,329 8,716 2.39 %
Tax-Free Loans(1)(2)
210,132 3,353 3.22 %330,298 5,223 3.18 %
Taxable Loans(1)
2,780,127 56,562 4.10 %2,618,395 60,374 4.64 %
Total Loans2,990,259 59,915 4.04 %2,948,693 65,597 4.47 %
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock4,006 68 3.42 %4,755 131 5.54 %
Total Interest-Earning Assets3,956,282 $66,899 3.41 %3,772,613 $74,680 3.98 %
Noninterest Earning Assets176,553 284,455 
Total Assets$4,132,835 $4,057,068 
LIABILITIES
Interest-Bearing Demand$391,555 $449 0.23 %$297,605 $688 0.46 %
Money Market330,838 570 0.35 %169,053 481 0.57 %
Savings651,340 331 0.10 %577,453 302 0.11 %
Certificates of Deposit1,566,436 10,705 1.38 %1,882,067 18,261 1.95 %
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits$2,940,169 $12,055 0.83 %$2,926,178 $19,732 1.36 %
Federal Funds Purchased— — — %110 1.83 %
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings31,934 187 1.18 %26,209 159 1.22 %
Other Borrowings2,914 77 5.33 %1,363 35 5.16 %
Total Borrowings34,848 264 1.53 %27,682 195 1.42 %
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities2,975,017 12,319 0.84 %2,953,860 19,927 1.36 %
Noninterest-bearing Liabilities765,852 621,978 
Shareholders' Equity391,966 481,230 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity$4,132,835 $4,057,068 
Net Interest Income(2)
$54,580 $54,753 
Net Interest Margin(2)
2.78 %2.92 %
(1)Nonaccruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding.
(2)Tax-exempt income is on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) using the statutory federal corporate income tax rate of 21 percent.
(3)Loan and deposit balances include held-for-assumption transactions in connection with sale of Bank branches.
Interest income decreased $2.5 million, or 7.1% and $7.4 million, or 10.1%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020. Interest income, on an FTE basis (non-GAAP), decreased $2.8 million, or 7.6% and $7.8 million, or 10.4%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020. We are currently maintaining higher liquidity levels as a result of COVID-19. The change was primarily due to increases in average interest-earning assets of $151.1 million and $183.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, offset by lower short-term interest rates compared to the same periods in 2020. Average interest-bearing deposits with banks increased $98.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021, and the average rate earned decreased 44 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same period in 2020. Average loan balances increased $5.6 million and $41.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020, which included PPP loan production that began in the second quarter of 2020. Average PPP loans totaled $29.8 million through June 30, 2021. The average rate earned on loans decreased 31 and 43 basis points for the second quarter and the first six months of 2021 compared to the same periods in 2020 primarily due to lower short-term interest rates. Average investment securities increased $63.2 million and $44.9 million and the average rate earned decreased 48 and 63 basis points for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020. The change in investment securities is the result of active balance sheet management as our portfolio has been diversified as to bond types, maturities, and interest rate structures.
Interest expense decreased $3.5 million and $7.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower short-term interest rates in 2021 as compared to 2020 as well as the intentional runoff of higher cost CDs. Interest expense on deposits decreased $3.5 million and $7.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020 primarily due to the
48

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
decline in the average balance of CDs and interest-bearing demand accounts. The decrease of $332.4 million and $315.6 million in the average balance of CDs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020 was primarily due to the intentional runoff of these higher cost CDs. Interest-bearing demand accounts increased $106.3 million and $94.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020. The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased 48 and 53 basis points for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020 primarily due to lower short-term interest rates. Overall, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 47 and 52 basis points for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020.
The following table sets forth for the periods presented a summary of the changes in interest earned and interest paid resulting from changes in volume and changes in rates:
Three Month Ended June 30, 2021
Compared to June 30, 2020
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
Compared to June 30, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)
Volume(3)
Rate(3)
Increase/
(Decrease)
Volume(3)
Rate(3)
Increase/
(Decrease)
Interest Earned on:
Interest-bearing Deposits with Banks$24 $$30 $145 $(275)$(130)
Tax-free Investment Securities(2)
(136)(7)(143)110 (45)65 
Taxable Investment Securities390 (846)(456)419 (2,390)(1,971)
Total Securities254 (853)(599)529 (2,435)(1,906)
Tax-free Loans(1)(2)
(987)(11)(998)(1,931)61 (1,870)
Taxable Loans(1)
1,442 (2,602)(1,160)3,524 (7,336)(3,812)
Total Loans455 (2,613)(2,158)1,593 (7,275)(5,682)
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock(21)(15)(36)(18)(45)(63)
Total Interest-earning Assets$712 $(3,475)$(2,763)$2,249 $(10,030)$(7,781)
Interest Paid on:
Interest-bearing Demand$73 $(81)$(8)$175 $(414)$(239)
Money Market156 (62)94 331 (242)89 
Savings17 (5)12 37 (8)29 
Certificates of Deposit(1,376)(2,199)(3,575)(2,746)(4,810)(7,556)
Total Interest-bearing Deposits(1,130)(2,347)(3,477)(2,203)(5,474)(7,677)
Federal Funds Purchased— — — — (1)(1)
FHLB Borrowings(15)(9)(5)33 28 
Other Borrowings27 (5)22 41 42 
Total Borrowings12 1 13 (4)73 69 
Total Interest-bearing Liabilities$(1,118)$(2,346)$(3,464)$(2,207)$(5,401)$(7,608)
Change in Net Interest Margin$1,830 $(1,129)$701 $4,456 $(4,629)$(173)
(1)Nonaccruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding. 
(2)Tax-exempt income is on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) using the statutory federal corporate income tax rate of 21 percent.
(3)Changes to rate/volume are allocated to both rate and volume on a proportionate dollar basis.
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses, which includes a provision for losses on unfunded commitments, is the amount to be added to the ACL, after considering loan charge-offs and recoveries, to bring the ACL to a level determined to be appropriate in management's judgment to absorb expected losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The Company elected to defer its adoption of CECL in accordance with relief provided under the CARES Act effective January 1, 2021. At January 1, 2021, we increased the ACL by $64.5 million for the Day 1 CECL adjustment which includes $61.6 million to the ACL and $2.9 million related to the life-of-loss reserve on unfunded loan commitments.
The provision for credit losses decreased $4.5 million to $1.0 million and $7.4 million to $2.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to $5.5 million and $10.3 million for the same periods in 2020. The provision for unfunded commitments included a release of $0.6 million and a release of $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021. For the three months ended June 30, 2021 the provision for credit losses was primarily driven by an increase of $5.7 million to the CECL model to account for uncertainty in credit quality with respect to loans in the “Other”
49

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
loan segment. This increase was offset by the release of $4.8 million of specific reserves in connection with the resolution of our two largest nonperforming relationships. These resolutions contributed to net charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30, 2021 totaling $8.5 million; however, $13.1 million was previously reserved.
Adjustments to the CECL model were made to account for additional potential deterioration in credit quality with respect to loans on deferral. Management reviews and analyzes the monthly operating statements of commercial clients in the deferral program. During the six months ended June 30, 2021, management observed continued deterioration on hospitality loans with aggregate principal balances of $50.9 million that are on deferral as of June 30, 2021. This adjustment resulted in current expected credit losses of $11.7 million at June 30, 2021. The Day 1 model recognized the deterioration of loans with an aggregate principal balance of $42.8 million which resulted in current expected credit losses of $10.2 million as of January 1, 2021. Between the Day 1 model and the model ended June 30, 2021 a loan with a principal balance of $8.1 million experienced additional deterioration resulting in additional current expected losses of $1.5 million in the first quarter of 2021.
During the three months ended June 30, 2021, we recognized charge-offs of $8.2 million related to the resolution of our two largest nonperforming credits. Net charge-offs were $8.5 million and $9.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to $1.0 million and $1.6 million for the same periods in 2020. As a percentage of average portfolio loans, on an annualized basis, net charge-offs were 1.15% and 0.63% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to 0.14% and 0.11% for the same periods in 2020.
At June 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020, nonperforming loans were $9.6 million, $32.0 million and $40.6 million, respectively. Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total portfolio loans were 0.33%, 1.09% and 1.37% as of June 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020, respectively.
At June 30, 2021, the adoption of Topic 326 and subsequent measurement under this standard, resulted in an increase to our ACL of $55.2 million, to $109.3 million compared to $54.1 million at December 31, 2020. The ACL as a percentage of total portfolio loans was 3.75% at June 30, 2021 and 1.83% at December 31, 2020.

Noninterest Income
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)20212020$ Change% Change20212020$ Change% Change
Gain on Sales of Securities, net$1,499 $2,321 $(822)(35.4)%$5,109 $3,535 $1,574 44.5 %
Service Charges, Commissions and Fees1,489 190 1,299 683.7 %3,298 1,840 1,458 79.2 %
Debit Card Interchange Fees1,874 1,468 406 27.6 %3,705 2,711 994 36.7 %
Insurance Commissions378 332 46 13.8 %672 1,641 (969)(59.1)%
Bank Owned Life Insurance Income342 350 (8)(2.3)%682 703 (21)(3.0)%
Gains on Sales of Other Real Estate Owned, net— 137 (137)(100.0)%— — — NM
Other Real Estate Owned Income82 (78)(94.5)%75 221 (146)(65.8)%
Commercial Loan Swap Fee Income742 1,125 (383)(34.1)%961 1,548 (587)(37.9)%
Other910 196 714 364.3 %1,688 817 871 106.6 %
Total Noninterest Income$7,238 $6,201 $1,037 16.7 %$16,190 $13,016 $3,174 24.4 %
NM - Not Meaningful
Total noninterest income increased $1.0 million, or 16.7%, to $7.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and increased $3.2 million, or 24.4%, to $16.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same periods in 2020. The increase of $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same period in 2020 was primarily the result of increases of $1.3 million in service charges on deposit accounts due to reinstating fees that we previously waived during 2020 for customers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, a premium of $0.5 million premium on the sale of four bank branches included in other income, and higher debit card interchange fees of $0.4 million due to usage. These increases were offset by declines in net security gains of $0.8 million, lower commercial loan swap fee income of $0.4 million and lower gains on OREO of $0.1 million. The fluctuations of commercial loan swap fee income were due to the timing and demand for this product in the current low interest rate environment.
50

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
For the six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same period in 2020, the increase of $3.2 million in total noninterest income was driven by the same variances as the second quarter period with higher net security gains of $1.6 million, service charges on deposit accounts increasing $1.5 million, debit card interchange fees up $1.0 million, a year-to-date premium of $0.5 million on the sale of four bank branches included in other income, lower commercial loan swap fee income of $0.6 million and lower gains on sale of OREO of $0.1 million. However, insurance commissions, for the six months ended June 30, 2021, declined $1.0 million compared to the prior year period. The increase in security gains of $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021, to $5.1 million compared to $3.5 million for the same period in 2020 was due to the Company taking advantage of market opportunities, and repositioning and diversifying holdings in its securities portfolio.
Noninterest Expense
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)20212020$ Change% Change20212020$ Change% Change
Salaries and Employee Benefits$13,686 $12,489 $1,197 9.6 %$26,268 $26,070 $198 0.8 %
Occupancy Expense, net3,451 3,415 36 1.1 %6,965 6,664 301 4.5 %
FDIC Insurance Expense657 537 120 22.3 %1,300 1,081 219 20.3 %
Other Taxes718 788 (70)(8.8)%1,480 1,534 (54)(3.5)%
Advertising Expense220 394 (174)(44.0)%390 1,006 (616)(61.2)%
Telephone Expense588 573 15 2.6 %1,188 1,147 41 3.5 %
Professional and Legal Fees1,440 1,399 41 2.9 %2,664 1,836 828 45.1 %
Data Processing954 595 359 60.3 %1,875 1,081 794 73.4 %
Losses on Sales and Write-downs of Other Real Estate Owned, net2,603 — 2,603 NM2,815 52 2,763 NM
Losses on Sales and Write-downs on Bank Premises, net64 59 8.5 %107 71 36 50.7 %
Debit Card Expense713 671 42 6.3 %1,345 1,225 120 9.8 %
Tax Credit Amortization427 272 155 57.0 %854 544 310 57.0 %
Unfunded Loan Commitment Expense — (383)383 (100.0)%— 599 (599)(100.0)%
Other Real Estate Owned Expense142 177 (35)(19.8)%196 317 (121)(38.2)%
Other2,096 2,037 59 2.9 %3,917 4,407 (490)(11.1)%
Total Noninterest Expense$27,759 $23,023 $4,736 20.6 %$51,364 $47,634 $3,730 7.8 %
NM - Not Meaningful
Total noninterest expense increased $4.7 million, or 20.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and increased $3.7 million, or 7.8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same periods in 2020. The primary driver of the increase for both the three and six month periods was the nonrecurring write-down of $3.0 million for closed bank branches. These branches were closed in the second quarter of 2021, transferred to OREO and marketed for sale resulting in the $3.0 million nonrecurring write-down. Other variances for the three-month period ended June 30, 2021 were higher salaries and employee benefits of $1.2 million due to increased medical expenses for several large critical illness claims and a $0.4 million nonrecurring severance and stay bonus for impacted employees in the second quarter of 2021. Also offsetting the three-month increase was $0.4 million unfunded loan commitment expense, $0.4 million in data processing expenses due to new products and $0.2 million in tax credit amortization. The $0.4 million decline in unfunded loan commitment expense is a result of the adoption of CECL as unfunded loan commitment expense is now recorded as part of provision for credit losses instead of noninterest expense.
Along with the above mentioned nonrecurring write-down for closed bank branches the increase during the six months ended June 30, 2021 included $0.8 million higher professional and legal fees, $0.8 million higher data processing expenses due to an increase in customer accounts and new modules added to our core processor, $0.3 million increase in the amortization of tax credits, and $0.3 million in occupancy expenses. These increases were offset by decreases of $0.6 million in advertising expenses due to the sunset of our deposit acquisition strategy in the fourth quarter of 2020, lower unfunded loan commitment expense of $0.6 million and a $0.5 million decrease in other noninterest expense.
51

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes increased $1.4 million and $2.1 million to $0.9 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to tax benefits of $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the same periods in 2020. Pretax income increased $2.4 million and $8.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2020. Our effective tax rate was 14.0% and 10.9% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to negative 12.3% and negative 2.8% for the same periods in 2020. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to a higher level of pretax income and a lower level of tax-exempt interest income. The Company ordinarily generates an annual effective tax rate that is less than the statutory rate of 21% due to benefits resulting from tax-exempt interest income, tax credit projects and BOLI, which are relatively consistent regardless of the level of pretax income.
Financial Condition
June 30, 2021
Total assets decreased $58.7 million, to $4.1 billion at June 30, 2021 compared to $4.2 billion at December 31, 2020. Federal Reserve Bank excess reserves decreased $61.2 million to $102.3 million at June 30, 2021 from $163.5 million at December 31, 2020 due to active balance sheet management.
Total portfolio loans decreased $30.5 million, or 2.1% on an annualized basis, to $2.9 billion at June 30, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020 primarily due to several large commercial loan payoffs. The variances in loan segments for portfolio loans is primarily related to the adoption of Topic 326. We made changes to our loan portfolio segments to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance under CECL. The new segmentation breaks out an Other category from the original loan categories, which applies only to the current year 2021 and was not applied to periods during 2020 and prior years, therefore showing fluctuations in all categories. At March 31, 2021, the initial break-out of Other loans related to the adoption of Topic 326 totaled $373.4 million consisting of $136.3 million of CRE, $77.8 million of C&I, $49.6 million of Residential Mortgages and $109.7 million of Construction. This segment of loans has unique risk attributes considered inconsistent with current underwriting standards. The analysis applied to this segment resulted in an increase in reserves of $51.3 million.
OREO increased $5.5 million at June 30, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020 due to 20 branches that were closed during the second quarter of 2021, and moved to OREO and marketed for sale resulting in a $3.0 million nonrecurring write-down. These closures were completed as part of our branch network optimization project that aligns with our strategic goals to enhance franchise value and improve operating efficiency. Closed retail bank offices increased $8.2 million with a remaining book value of $10.7 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $2.5 million at December 31, 2020.
The securities portfolio increased $64.9 million and is currently 20.5% of total assets at June 30, 2021 compared to 18.6% of total assets at December 31, 2020. The increase is a result of active balance sheet management. We have further diversified the securities portfolio as to bond types, maturities and interest rate structures.
Total deposits decreased $25.3 million to $3.7 billion at June 30, 2021 as compared to December 31, 2020. The decline from December 31, 2020 was due to $84.7 million of deposits held-for-assumption in connection with the sale of four bank branches which were sold during the second quarter of 2021. Core deposits, including noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand deposits, money market accounts and savings, increased by $217.0 million, or 10.9%, at June 30, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020. Offsetting these increases was the intentional runoff of $157.6 million of higher cost CDs. Noninterest-bearing deposits comprised 19.7% and 19.0% of total deposits at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. CDs comprised 39.8% and 43.8% of total deposits at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.
Total capital decreased by $41.1 million to $399.1 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $440.2 million at December 31, 2020. The decrease in equity was primarily due to the $50.7 million cumulative-effect adjustment related to the adoption of Topic 326, a $5.6 million, net of tax, decrease in other comprehensive loss due to changes in the fair value of available-for-sale securities partially offset by net income of $14.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021. The remaining difference of $0.5 million is related to stock-based compensation during the six months ended June 30, 2021.
The ACL was 3.75% of total portfolio loans at June 30, 2021 compared to an allowance for loan losses of 1.83% as of December 31, 2020. General reserves as a percentage of total portfolio loans were 3.68% at June 30, 2021 compared to 1.32% at December 31, 2020. Management believes, the ACL is adequate to absorb expected losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
52

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
The Company remains well capitalized. Our Tier 1 capital ratio increased to 13.40% at June 30, 2021 compared to 13.08% at December 31, 2020. Our leverage ratio was 10.23% at June 30, 2021, compared to 10.26% at December 31, 2020 and total risk-based capital ratio was 14.66% at June 30, 2021 compared to 14.33% at December 31, 2020. We adopted CECL effective January 1, 2021 and elected to implement the regulatory agencies’ capital transition relief over the permissible three-year period.
Securities Activity
The following table presents the composition of available-for-sale securities:
(Dollars in Thousands)June 30, 2021December 31, 2020$ Change
U.S. Treasury Securities$4,440 $— $4,440 
U.S. Government Agency Securities3,477 — 3,477 
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities61,894 44,724 17,170 
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities2,245 5,447 (3,202)
Asset Backed Securities138,206 133,557 4,649 
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations259,810 218,359 41,451 
Small Business Administration102,674 99,145 3,529 
States and Political Subdivisions229,734 252,622 (22,888)
Corporate Notes41,058 24,825 16,233 
Total Debt Securities$843,538 $778,679 $64,859 
The Company invests in various securities in order to maintain a source of liquidity, to satisfy various pledging requirements, to increase net interest income and as a tool of the ALCO to diversify and reposition the balance sheet for interest rate risk purposes. Securities are subject to market risks that could negatively affect the level of liquidity available to us. Security purchases are subject to our investment policy that is approved annually by our Board and administered through ALCO and our treasury function.
The securities portfolio increased by $64.9 million to $843.5 million at June 30, 2021 as compared to $778.7 million at December 31, 2020. Securities comprise 20.5% of total assets at June 30, 2021 as compared to 18.6% at December 31, 2020. The increase is a result of active balance sheet management. We have further diversified the securities portfolio as to bond types, maturities and interest rate structures.
At June 30, 2021 total gross unrealized gains in the available-for-sale portfolio were $15.5 million, offset by $2.8 million of gross unrealized losses. At December 31, 2020, total gross unrealized gains in the available-for-sale portfolio were $22.6 million offset by $2.7 million of gross unrealized losses.
Management evaluates the securities portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on a quarterly basis. At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company did not record any OTTI. The performance of the debt and equity securities markets could generate impairments in future periods requiring realized losses to be reported.
53

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
Loan Composition
The following table summarizes our loan portfolio for the periods presented:
(Dollars in Thousands)June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
Commercial
Commercial Real Estate$1,337,792 $1,453,799 
Commercial and Industrial413,842 557,164 
Total Commercial Loans1,751,634 2,010,963 
Consumer
Residential Mortgages425,642 472,170 
Other Consumer43,336 57,647 
Total Consumer Loans468,978 529,817 
Construction320,885 406,390 
Other 375,157 — 
Total Portfolio Loans2,916,654 2,947,170 
Loans Held-for-Sale9,311 25,437 
Loans Held-for-Sale in Connection with Sale of Bank Branches, at the lower of cost or fair value— 9,835 
Total Loans$2,925,965 $2,982,442 
Our loan portfolio represents our most significant source of interest income. The risk that borrowers will be unable to pay such obligations is inherent in the loan portfolio. Other conditions such as downturns in the borrower's industry or the overall economic climate can significantly impact the borrower’s ability to pay. For a discussion of the risk factors relevant to our business and operations, please refer to Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Total portfolio loans decreased $30.5 million, or 1.0%, to $2.9 billion at June 30, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020. The variances in loan segments for portfolio loans is primarily related to the adoption of Topic 326. We made changes to our loan portfolio segments to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance under CECL. The new segmentation breaks out an Other category from the original loan categories, which applies only to the current year 2021 and was not adjusted to the comparable period, therefore showing fluctuations in all categories. At March 31, 2021 the initial break-out of Other loans related to the adoption of Topic 326 totaled $373.4 million consisting of $136.3 million of Commercial Real Estate, (“CRE”), $77.8 million of Commercial and Industrial (“C&I”), $49.6 million of Residential Mortgages and $109.7 million of Construction. This segment of loans includes unique risk attributes considered inconsistent with current underwriting standards. The analysis applied to this segment resulted in an increase in reserves of $51.3 million.
Nonperforming loans decreased $22.4 million, or 70.1%, to $9.6 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $32.0 million at December 31, 2020. OREO increased $5.5 million at June 30, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020 due to 20 branches that were closed during the second quarter of 2021, and moved to OREO and marketed for sale resulting in a $3.0 million nonrecurring write-down. These closures were completed as part of our branch network optimization project that aligns with our strategic goals to enhance franchise value and improve operating efficiency. Closed retail bank offices increased $8.2 million with a remaining book value of $10.7 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $2.5 million at December 31, 2020.
The commercial portfolio is monitored for potential concentrations of credit risk by market, type of lending, CRE property type, C&I and owner-occupied CRE by industry, investment CRE dependent on common tenants and industries or property types that are similarly impacted by external factors.
Our exposure to hospitality at June 30, 2021 equated to approximately $486.4 million, or 16.7% of total portfolio loans. These were mostly loans secured by upscale or top tier flagged hotels, which have historically exhibited low leverage and strong operating cash flows. During the second quarter of 2021, we have observed a sharp increase in occupancy and the average daily rate for our hotel clients, however our clients are now facing enormous challenges when it comes to attracting labor, which has caused, or will cause, them to draw on their existing lines of credit with other financial institutions or other sources of liquidity and may adversely affect their ability to repay existing indebtedness. These developments, together with the current economic conditions generally, may adversely impact the value of real estate collateral in hospitality and other commercial real estate exposure. As a result, our financial condition, capital levels and results of operations could be adversely affected.
54

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
Portfolio loan balances of our top 10 credit relationships were $740.7 million at June 30, 2021, with a total commitment exposure of $752.0 million. These loans are in the hospitality, golf course, agricultural, land holdings, commercial real estate (multi-family and office/retail), energy, land development, and lumber industries. The other segment is comprised of 49.5% of the top 10 credit relationships.
Line utilization, unused commitments, excluding consumer overdraft lines, were $409.8 million at June 30, 2021 as compared to $410.7 million at December 31, 2020. The majority of unused commitments are for construction projects that will be drawn as the construction completes. Total utilization, excluding consumer overdraft lines, was 53.0% at June 30, 2021, as compared to 52.2% at December 31, 2020. Commercial line utilization was 52.9% at June 30, 2021, as compared to 51.7% at December 31, 2020.
From time to time, we have mortgage loans held-for-sale derived from two sources. First, we purchase mortgage loans on a short-term basis from a partner financial institution that have fully executed sales contracts to end investors. Secondly, we originate and close mortgages with fully executed contracts with investors to purchase shortly after closing. We then hold these mortgage loans from both sources until funded by the investor, typically a two-week period. Mortgage loans held-for-sale were $9.3 million and $25.4 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.
In addition to mortgage loans held-for-sale, the Company had $9.8 million in loans held-for-sale in connection with sale of Bank branches at December 31, 2020 that all closed during the second quarter of 2021.
Credit Quality
On a monthly basis, a criticized asset committee meets to review all special mention and substandard loans within prescribed policy thresholds. These loans typically represent the highest risk of loss to the Company. Action plans are established and these loans are monitored through regular contact with the borrower and loan officer, review of current financial information and other documentation, review of all loan or potential loan restructures or modifications and the regular re-evaluation of assets held as collateral.
We attempt to limit our exposure to credit risk by diversifying our loan portfolio by segment, geography, collateral and industry and actively managing concentrations. When concentrations exist in certain segments, we mitigate this risk by reviewing the relevant economic indicators and interest risk rating trends and through stress testing of the loans in these segments. The Company has specific loan segment limits in its loan policy. Total commercial real estate balances should not exceed the combination of 300% of total risk based capital and growth in excess of 50% over the previous thirty-six months and construction loan balances should not exceed 100% of total risk based capital. Investment real estate property types and purchased loan programs have individual dollar limits that should not be exceeded in the portfolio. In addition, there are specific limits in place for various categories of real estate loans with regards to loan-to-value ratios, loan terms, and amortization periods. We also have policy limits on loan-to-cost for construction projects.
Unsecured loans pose a higher risk for the Company due to the lack of a well-defined secondary source of repayment. Commercial unsecured loans are reserved for the best quality customers with well-established businesses, operate with low financial and operating leverage and demonstrate an ability to clear the outstanding balance on lines of credit for at least thirty consecutive days annually. The repayment capacity of the borrower should exceed all policy and guidelines for secured loans. If the borrower is unable to comply with this requirement and the Company is willing to renew the credit facility, the line should be secured and/or begin amortization.
On a quarterly basis, the Credit Risk Committee of the Board meets to review our loan portfolio metrics, segmentation guidelines, and loan review findings from the previous quarter. Annually, this same committee reviews credit related policies and policy enhancements as they become available.
Additional credit risk management practices include periodic review and update of our lending policies and procedures to support sound underwriting practices and portfolio management through portfolio stress testing. Our loan review serves as a mechanism to individually monitor credit quality and assess the effectiveness of credit risk management practices to provide oversight of all corporate lending activities. The loan review function has the primary responsibility for assessing commercial credit administration and credit decision functions of consumer and mortgage underwriting, as well as providing input to the loan risk rating process. Our policy is to place loans in all categories in nonaccrual status when collection of interest or principal is doubtful, or generally when interest or principal payments are 90 days or more past due based on contractual terms.
55

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
The Company has a loan review policy and annual scope report that details the level of loan review for commercial loans in a given year. Primary objectives of loan reviews include the identification of emerging risks and patterns that might influence potential future losses. In concert with significant enhancements to the underwriting process, the scope of loan review has been broadened since 2019 to include assurance testing with respect to the accuracy of the underwriting function. Since 2020 and continuing into 2021, the Company used a four step approach for loan review in the following categories:
A review of the largest twenty pass-rated loan relationships, which represents approximately a quarter of total loans;
A sampling of new loans originated to include an examination of the evidence of appropriate approval, adherence to loan policy and the completeness and accuracy of the analysis contained in the approval document;
A sampling of large loan relationships which are defined as loan relationships with aggregate exposure of at least $2.0 million that are not part of the top 20 review; and
Concentration focus reviews of identified segments that represent concentration risk, represented by collateral types including but not limited to hospitality, multifamily and retail with the goal of examining patterns of loss history, document exceptions, policy exceptions and emerging trends in risk characteristics. The Company does not typically structure these with a 30-day cleanout feature since that is difficult to measure and enforce. Instead we usually set higher debt service standards and underwrite to the ability to amortize the loan on unsecured terms.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The ACL represents an amount which, in management's judgment, is adequate to absorb current expected credit losses on outstanding loans at the balance sheet date based on the evaluation of the size and current risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, past events, current conditions, reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions and prepayment experience. The ACL is measured and recorded upon the initial recognition of a financial asset. The ACL is reduced by charge-offs previously reserved for, net of recoveries of previous losses, and is increased or decreased by a provision for credit losses, which is recorded as a current period operating expense.
Determination of an appropriate ACL is inherently complex and requires the use of significant and highly subjective estimates. The reasonableness of the ACL is reviewed quarterly by management.
Management believes it uses relevant information available to make determinations about the ACL and that it has established the existing allowance in accordance with GAAP. However, the determination of the ACL requires significant judgment, and estimates of expected losses in the loan portfolio can vary significantly from the amounts actually observed. While management uses available information to recognize expected losses, future additions to the ACL may be necessary based on changes in the loans comprising the portfolio, changes in the current and forecasted economic conditions, changes to the interest rate environment which may directly impact prepayment and curtailment rate assumptions, and changes in the financial condition of borrowers.
The adoption of CECL guidance did not result in a significant change to any other credit risk management and monitoring processes, including identification of past due or delinquent borrowers, nonaccrual practices, assessment of troubled debt restructurings or charge-off policy.
The Company’s methodology for estimating the ACL includes:
Segmentation. The Company’s loan portfolio is segmented by homogeneous loan types that behave similarly to economic cycles.
Specific Analysis. A specific reserve analysis is applied to certain individually evaluated loans. These loans are evaluated quarterly generally based on collateral value, observable market value or the present value of expected future cash flows. A specific reserve is established if the fair value is less than the loan balance. A charge-off is recognized when the loss is quantifiable. Individually evaluated loans not specifically analyzed reside in the Quantitative Analysis.
Quantitative Analysis. The Company elected to use Discounted Cash Flow (“DCF”), which calculates a net present value of expected future cash flows, adjusted for the expected life of the portfolio. Economic forecasts include but are not limited to
56

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
unemployment, the Consumer Price Index, the Housing Price Index and Gross Domestic Product. These forecasts are assumed to revert to the long-term average and utilized in the model to estimate the probability of default and loss given default through regression. Model assumptions include, but are not limited to the discount rate, prepayments and curtailments. The product of the probability of default and the loss given default is the estimated loss rate, which varies over time. The estimated loss rate is applied within the appropriate periods in the cash flow model to determine the net present value. Net present value is also impacted by assumptions related to the duration between default and recovery. Economic forecasts spanning four quarters are utilized and then reverted to the long term average to form the estimation of expected future cash flows. The reserve is based on the difference between the summation of the principal balances taking amortized costs into consideration and the summation of the net present values.
Qualitative Analysis. Based on management’s review and analysis of internal, external and model risks, management may adjust the model output. Management reviews the peaks and troughs of the model’s calibration, taking into account economic forecasts to develop guardrails that serve as the basis for determining the reasonableness of the model’s output, analyzes the forecast inputs in relation to the model’s calibration and makes adjustments as necessary. This process challenges unexpected variability resulting from outputs beyond the model’s calibration that appear to be unreasonable. Additionally, management may adjust the economic forecast if it is incompatible with known market conditions based on management’s experience and perspective. At Day 1 adoption of CECL, current expected losses of $10.2 million were recorded due to economic uncertainties related to the Company's hospitality portfolio. Between the Day 1 CECL model and the model ended June 30, 2021, additional current expected losses of $1.5 million were recognized, which resulted in a total current expected loss balance of $11.7 million as of June 30, 2021. Certain hospitality loans exhibit more than expected deterioration and the risk rating has been downgraded to non-pass to reflect the increased risk.
Management elected to create reserves with the adoption of the CECL model. These reserves were developed in addition to the model’s methodology. The model introduced a segmented portfolio of loans for discrete analysis. This segmented pool has unique risk attributes considered inconsistent with current underwriting standards.
“Other” Segmented Pool
CECL provides for the flexibility to model loans differently compared to the incurred loss model. With the adoption of CECL, management elected to separately evaluate certain loans from the Quantitative Analysis based on shared but unique risk attributes. These loans are included in the Other segment of the model. These loans were underwritten and approved based on standards that are inconsistent with our current underwriting standards, which have been enhanced by current management. These inconsistencies may include, but are not limited to i) transaction and/or relationship sizes that exceed limits established in 2018, ii) overreliance on secondary, tertiary or guarantor cash flow, iii) land acquisition loans without a defined source of amortization, and iv) loan structures on operating lines of credit dependent on the value of real estate rather than trading assets. A general reserve of $56.0 million, which is an increase from the $4.7 million under the probable incurred loss model, was established based on the discounted cash flow method with a discount rate, which was quantitatively adjusted.
The following tables summarize activity in the ACL during the period presented and present supplemental asset quality information as of the dates presented.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
and
Industrial
Residential
Mortgage
Other
Consumer
Construction
Other (1)
Total
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans:
Balance at Beginning of Period$42,342$4,905 $5,171$1,347$7,106$56,001$116,872
Provision for Credit Losses on Loans(6,103)(185)2172691,0395,730967
Charge-offs(8,238)(7)(22)(539)(8,806)
Recoveries1401144286
Net (Charge-offs) / Recoveries(8,098)(6)(21)(395)(8,520)
Balance at End of Period$28,141$4,714 $5,367$1,221$8,145$61,731$109,319
(1) In connection with our adoption of Topic 326, we made changes to our loan portfolio segments to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance under CECL. Our new segmentation breaks out Other loans from our original loan segments: CRE, C&I, residential mortgages and construction. The allowance balance at the beginning of period were reclassified to Other from their original loan segments: CRE, C&I, residential mortgages and construction to conform to current presentation.
57

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
and
Industrial
Residential
Mortgage
Other
Consumer
Construction
Other (1)
Total
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans:
Balance at Beginning of Period$34,871$3,643 $2,000$2,479$6,357$4,724$54,074
Impact of CECL Adoption6,5871,379 3,356(877)(80)51,27761,642
Provision for Credit Losses on Loans(5,219)(302)617471,8075,7302,824
Charge-offs(8,238)(8)(217)(1,409)(9,872)
Recoveries14016728161651
Net (Charge-offs) / Recoveries(8,098)(6)(50)(1,128)61(9,221)
Balance at End of Period$28,141$4,714 $5,367$1,221$8,145$61,731$109,319
(1) In connection with our adoption of Topic 326, we made changes to our loan portfolio segments to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance under CECL. Our new segmentation breaks out Other loans from our original loan segments: CRE, C&I, residential mortgages and construction. The allowance balance at the beginning of period were reclassified to Other from their original loan segments: CRE, C&I, residential mortgages and construction to conform to current presentation.
June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
Net Charge-offs to Average Portfolio Loans0.63 %*0.09 %
Allowance for Credit Losses to Total Portfolio Loans3.75 %1.83 %
*Annualized
The adoption of Topic 326 resulted in an increase to our ACL of $61.6 million on January 1, 2021. The Day 1 model introduced a segmented portfolio of loans for discrete analysis. This segmented pool had an aggregate principal balance of $380.0 million at adoption and includes unique risk attributes considered inconsistent with current underwriting standards. These inconsistencies may include, but are not limited to i) transaction and/or relationship sizes that exceed limits established in 2018, ii) overreliance on secondary, tertiary or guarantor cash flow, iii) land acquisition loans without a defined source of amortization, and iv) loan structures on operating lines of credit dependent on the value of real estate rather than trading assets. Management continuously assesses underwriting standards but significantly enhanced these standards in 2018. The analysis applied to this pool resulted in expected credit losses of $51.3 million, at adoption and is disclosed in the Other segment item in the table above.
At December 31, 2020, the aforementioned Other segment within the probable incurred loss model included $102.5 million of impaired loans and the remaining $277.5 million were not impaired and remained in their respective segments. Based on the fair value of collateral, the specific reserves on the impaired loans totaled zero and the general reserves for the remainder of these loans totaled $4.7 million at December 31, 2020.
As of January 1, 2021, our CECL methodology introduced a modified discounted cash flow methodology based on expected cash flow changes in the future for the Other segment. This methodology produced a significantly higher level of reserves from the incurred loss model. Certain portions of the CECL model are inherently subjective and include, but are not limited to estimates with respect to: prepayment speeds, the timing of prepayments, potential losses given default, discount rates and the timing of future cash flows. Management utilizes widely published economic forecasts as the basis for the regression analysis used to estimate the probability of default in the baseline model. The peaks and troughs of these forecasts serve as guardrails for potential subjective adjustments. In addition to considering the outcomes based on the range of forecasts, management recognizes that the assumptions used in economic forecasts may not perfectly align with our market area, risk profile or unique attributes of our portfolio along with other important considerations. Severe changes in forecasts can also create significant variability and management must assess not only the absolute balance of reserves but also consider the appropriateness of the velocity of change. Therefore, management developed a framework to assess the tolerance and reasonableness of the CECL modeling process by challenging certain elements of the forecasts, when appropriate. These outcomes, known as “challenger models” provide opportunities to examine and subjectively adjust the CECL model output and are designed to be countercyclical, thereby reducing variability. This methodology resulted in an increase in other reserves totaling $51.3 million.
The ACL increased $55.2 million to $109.3 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $54.1 million at December 31, 2020 primarily due to the Day 1 adoption of CECL of $61.6 million. The first six months of 2021 adjustments to the CECL model were made to account for additional potential deterioration in credit quality with respect to certain loans on deferral. Management reviews and analyzes the monthly operating statements of commercial clients in the deferral program. The
58

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
recovery has not been as sharp as management had anticipated as observed in other hospitality credits. Hospitality loans on deferral at the end of Phase III of the deferral program, which expired on June30, 2021, had an aggregate principal balances of $50.9 million, which resulted in a current expected credit loss of $11.7 million. This adjustment resulted in expected credit losses of $11.7 million at June 30, 2021. The Day 1 model recognized the deterioration of loans with an aggregate principal balance of $42.8 million which resulted in current expected credit losses of $10.2 million as of January 1, 2021. Between the Day 1 model and the model ended June 30, 2021 a loan with a principal balance of $8.1 million was recognized resulting in additional expected credit losses of $1.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2021.
The ACL was $109.3 million, or 3.75%, of total portfolio loans at June 30, 2021, as compared to an allowance for loans losses of $54.1 million, or 1.83% of total portfolio loans at December 31, 2020.
Net charge-offs were $8.5 million and $9.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, compared to $1.0 million and $1.6 million for the same periods in 2020. The resolution of our two largest nonperforming credits resulted in charge-offs of $8.2 million during the second quarter of 2021 and were previously reserved. As a percentage of average portfolio loans, on an annualized basis, net charge-offs were 0.63% and 0.09% for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and year ended December 31, 2020, respectively. Nonperforming loans decreased $22.4 million, or 70.1%, to $9.6 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $32.0 million at December 31, 2020. Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total portfolio loans were 0.33%, 1.09% and 1.37% as of June 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020, respectively.
Loans that amortize monthly, such as closed-end installment loans and amortizing loans secured by real estate are reported past due when the borrower is in arrears two or more monthly payments. Loans that amortize on a schedule other than monthly and interest only loans are reported past due when one scheduled payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more. We monitor delinquency on a monthly basis for early identification of potential problem loans.
Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) are loans that we, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grant a concession to the borrower that we would not otherwise grant. The Company strives to identify borrowers in financial difficulty early and work with them to modify the terms before their loan reaches nonaccrual status. These modified terms generally include extension of maturity dates at a stated interest rate lower than the current market rate for a new loan with similar characteristics, reductions in contractual interest rates or principal deferment. While unusual, there may be instances of principal forgiveness. Modifications structured with deferments for significant periods are generally considered TDRs. However, related to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have modified certain loans since March 2020 without considering them TDRs if consistent with the CARES Act and guidance issued by the federal bank regulatory agencies. Generally, modifications that have not been considered a TDR are relatively short-term in nature.
An accruing loan that is modified and determined to be a TDR can remain in accrual status if, based on a current credit analysis, collection of principal and interest in accordance with the modified terms is reasonably assured, and the borrower has demonstrated sustained historical performance for a reasonable period before the modification. TDRs are considered impaired loans and reported as a TDR in the calendar year in which they are determined. The Company individually evaluates all impaired loans, which includes TDRs, greater than or equal to $1.0 million as individually evaluated loans unless otherwise accounted for in the CECL model. Nonaccrual TDRs can be returned to accrual status if the ultimate collectability of all contractual amounts due, according to the restructured agreement, is not in doubt and there is a period of a minimum of six months of satisfactory payment performance by the borrower subsequent to the restructuring.
As an example, consider a substandard commercial construction loan that is currently 90 days past due where the loan is restructured to extend the maturity date for a period longer than would be considered an insignificant period of time. The post-modification interest rate given to the borrower is considered to be lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk and all other terms remain the same according to the original loan agreement. This loan will be considered a TDR as the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and a concession has been granted due to the long extension, resulting in payment delay as well as the rate being lower than current market rate for new debt with similar risk. The loan will be reported as a nonaccrual TDR and an individually evaluated loan. In addition, the loan could be charged down to the fair value of the collateral if a confirmed loss exists. If the loan subsequently performs, by means of making on-time principal and interest payments according to the newly restructured terms for a period of six months, and it is expected that all remaining principal and interest will be collected according to the terms of the restructured agreement, the loan will be returned to accrual status and reported as an accruing TDR. For the loan’s remaining life, it will continue to be individually evaluated because the interest rate was not adjusted to be equal to or greater than the rate that would be accepted at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk.
59

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
TDRs decreased $24.8 million, or 18.5% to $109.4 million at June 30, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020. The Company received $13.6 million and $16.6 million of pay-downs and had no new additions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively. The $24.8 million of pay-downs included $8.2 million in charge-offs for the resolution of our two largest nonperforming credits. There were no new TDRs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021. TDRs of $3.2 million and $25.0 million were nonaccrual as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2021, we modified no loans that constituted a TDR that had minimal commitments to lend additional funds.
Our charge-off policy for commercial loans requires that loans and other obligations that are not collectible be promptly charged-off when the loss becomes quantifiable, regardless of the delinquency status of the loan. The Company may elect to recognize a partial charge-off when management has determined that the value of collateral is less than the remaining investment in the loan. A loan or obligation does not need to be charged-off, regardless of delinquency status, if (i) management has determined there exists sufficient collateral to protect the remaining loan balance and (ii) there exists a strategy to liquidate the collateral. Management may also consider a number of other factors to determine when a charge-off is appropriate. These factors may include, but are not limited to:
The status of a bankruptcy proceeding;
The value of collateral and probability of successful liquidation; and/or;
The status of adverse proceedings or litigation that may result in collection.
Consumer unsecured loans and secured loans are evaluated for charge-off after the loan becomes 90 days past due. Unsecured loans are fully charged-off and secured loans are charged-off to the estimated fair value of the collateral less the cost to sell.
Our policy is to place loans in all categories in nonaccrual status when collection of interest or principal is doubtful, or generally when interest or principal payments are 90 days or more past due.
60

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans, nonaccrual TDRs and OREO. The following table summarizes nonperforming assets for the dates presented:
(Dollars in Thousands)June 30, 2021December 31, 2020$ Change
Nonperforming Loans
Commercial Real Estate$632 $224 $408 
Commercial and Industrial674 456 218 
Construction2,114 2,012 102 
Residential Mortgages2,841 4,135 (1,294)
Other Consumer90 191 (101)
Other— — — 
Total Nonperforming Loans6,351 7,018 (667)
Nonperforming Troubled Debt Restructurings
Commercial Real Estate146 21,667 (21,521)
Commercial and Industrial— — — 
Construction3,071 3,319 (248)
Residential Mortgages— — — 
Other Consumer— — — 
Other — — — 
Total Nonperforming Troubled Debt Restructurings3,217 24,986 (21,769)
Total Nonperforming Loans and Troubled Debt Restructurings9,568 32,004 (22,436)
Other Real Estate Owned21,250 15,722 5,528 
Total Nonperforming Assets$30,818 $47,726 $(16,908)
June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
Nonperforming Loans and Troubled Debt Restructurings to Total Portfolio Loans0.33 %1.09 %
Nonperforming Assets to Total Portfolio Loans plus Other Real Estate Owned1.05 %1.61 %
Nonperforming assets decreased $16.9 million to $30.8 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $47.7 million at December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily related to the resolution of our two largest nonperforming credits, offset by a 5.5 million net increase in OREO. The increase in OREO was primarily due to closed retail offices during the second quarter of 2021. Closed retail bank offices have a remaining book value of $10.7 million at June 30, 2021 and $2.5 million at December 31, 2020. The gross amount of interest that would have been recorded under original terms had these loans not been placed on nonaccrual status was $0.8 million and $1.9 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively. There were $7 thousand nonaccrual loans related to loans held-for-sale at December 31, 2020.
The CARES Act permits banks to suspend requirements under GAAP for loan modifications to borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic that would otherwise be characterized as TDRs and suspend any determination related thereto if (i) the loan modification is made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of December 31, 2020 or 60 days after the end of the COVID-19 emergency declaration and (ii) the applicable loan was not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. The provisions of the CARES Act dealing with temporary relief related to TDRs was extended pursuant to the CAA, which was signed into law on December 27, 2020. This amendment extended the “applicable” period to the earlier of January 1, 2022 or 60 days after the date on which the national emergency concerning the COVID-19 pandemic terminates. The federal banking agencies also issued guidance to encourage banks to make loan modifications for borrowers affected by COVID-19 and to assure banks that they will not be criticized by examiners for doing so. We are currently applying this guidance to qualifying loan modifications. At this time, it is uncertain what future impact loan and lease modifications related to COVID-19 will have on our financial condition, results of operations and ACL.
61

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
The following table summarizes loans past due 30-89 days for the periods presented:
(Dollars in Thousands)June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
Loans 30 to 89 Days Past Due
Commercial
Commercial Real Estate$5,932 $3,816 
Commercial and Industrial124 384 
Total Commercial Loans6,056 4,200 
Consumer
Residential Mortgages505 1,347 
Other Consumer327 580 
Total Consumer Loans832 1,927 
Construction16 284 
Other— — 
Total Loans 30 to 89 Days Past Due$6,904 $6,411 
Loans past due 30 to 89 days or more and still accruing, including held-for-sale loans, increased $0.5 million to $6.9 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $6.4 million at December 31, 2020. The variances in loan segments for past due 30 to 89 days is primarily related to the adoption of Topic 326. We made changes to our loan portfolio segments to align with the methodology applied in determining the allowance under CECL. The new segmentation breaks out an Other category from the original loan categories, which applies only to the current year 2021 and was not adjusted to the comparable period, therefore showing fluctuations in all categories.
Deposits
The following table presents the composition of deposits for the periods presented:
(Dollars in Thousands)June 30,
2021
December 31,
2020
$ Change% Change
Noninterest-bearing Demand$720,231 $699,229 $21,002 3.0 %
Interest-bearing Demand414,677 366,201 48,476 13.2 %
Money Market405,962 294,229 111,733 38.0 %
Savings661,303 625,482 35,821 5.7 %
Certificate of Deposits1,457,168 1,614,770 (157,602)(9.8)%
Deposits Held for Assumption in Connection with Sale of Bank Branches— 84,717 (84,717)(100.0)%
Total Deposits$3,659,341 $3,684,628 $(25,287)(0.7)%
Deposits are our primary source of funds. We believe that our deposit base is stable and that we have the ability to attract new depositors while diversifying the deposit composition. Total deposits at June 30, 2021 decreased $25.3 million, or 0.7%, from December 31, 2020. The decrease in deposits primarily related to the $157.6 million, or 9.8%, decline in CDs at June 30, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020 due to the intentional runoff of higher cost CDs, and $84.7 million of deposits held-for-assumption, at December 31, 2020, in connection with the sale of four bank branches which were sold during the second quarter of 2021. These decreases were offset by increases in our core deposits of $111.7 million in money market accounts due to our deposit acquisition strategy, a $48.5 million increase in interest-bearing demand deposits, a $35.8 million increase in savings accounts due to promotions and an increase of $21.0 million in noninterest-bearing demand accounts. Noninterest-bearing deposits comprised 19.7% and 19.0% of total deposits at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.
62

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings (“FHLB”)
Borrowings are an additional source of liquidity for the Company. FHLB borrowings were $30.0 million and $35.0 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. FHLB borrowings are fixed rate advances for various terms and are secured by a blanket lien on select residential mortgages, select multifamily loans, and select commercial real estate loans at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. Total loans pledged as collateral were $846.4 million and $804.2 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. There were no securities available-for-sale pledged as collateral at both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. The Company continues to methodically pledge additional eligible loans and expect continued progress in additional pledging throughout the year. The Bank is eligible to borrow up to an additional $547.9 million based upon current qualifying collateral and has a maximum borrowing capacity of approximately $1.0 billion, or 25.0% of the Company’s assets, as of June 30, 2021. The Company had the capacity to borrow up to an additional $510.5 million from the FHLB at December 31, 2020.
Information pertaining to long-term FHLB borrowings is summarized in the following table:
(Dollars in Thousands)June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
Balance at Period End$30,000 $35,000 
Average Balance during the Period$31,934 $30,628 
Average Interest Rate during the Period1.18 %1.18 %
Maximum Month-end Balance during the Period$35,000 $35,000 
Average Interest Rate at Period End1.15 %1.13 %
The Company held FHLB Atlanta stock of $3.2 million and $5.1 million at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Dividends recorded on this restricted stock were $31 thousand and $68 thousand for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively. Dividends recorded on this restricted stock were $67 thousand and $131 thousand for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively. The investment is carried at cost and evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value. We hold FHLB stock because we are a member of the FHLB of Atlanta. The FHLB requires members to purchase and hold a specified level of FHLB stock based upon the members’ asset values, level of borrowings and participation in other programs offered. Stock in the FHLB is non-marketable and is redeemable at the discretion of the FHLB. Members do not purchase stock in the FHLB for the same reasons that traditional equity investors acquire stock in an investor-owned enterprise. Rather, members purchase stock to obtain access to the products and services offered by the FHLB. Unlike equity securities of traditional for-profit enterprises, the stock of the FHLB does not provide its holders with an opportunity for capital appreciation because, by regulation, FHLB stock can only be purchased, redeemed and transferred at par value.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is defined as a financial institution’s ability to meet its cash and collateral obligations at a reasonable cost. This includes the ability to satisfy the financial needs of depositors who want to withdraw funds or of borrowers needing to access funds to meet their credit needs. In order to manage liquidity risk the Company’s Board has delegated authority to the ALCO for formulation, implementation and oversight of liquidity risk management for the Company. The ALCO’s goal is to maintain adequate levels of liquidity at a reasonable cost to meet funding needs in both a normal operating environment and for potential liquidity stress events. The ALCO monitors and manages liquidity through various ratios, reviewing cash flow projections, performing stress tests and by having a detailed contingency funding plan. The ALCO policy guidelines define graduated risk tolerance levels. If our liquidity position moves to a level that has been defined as high risk, specific actions are required, such as increased monitoring or the development of an action plan to reduce the risk position.
Our primary funding and liquidity source is a stable customer deposit base. Management believes that we have the ability to retain existing deposits and attract new deposits, mitigating any funding dependency on other more volatile sources. Although deposits are the primary source of funds, the Company has identified various other funding sources that can be used as part of our normal funding program when either a structure or cost efficiency has been identified. Additional funding sources accessible to the Company include borrowing availability at the FHLB, equal to 25.0% of the Company’s assets approximating $1.0 billion, subject to the amount of eligible collateral pledged, federal funds lines with six other correspondent financial institutions in the amount of $145.0 million, access to the institutional CD market, and the brokered deposit market. In addition to the lines referenced above, the Company also has $697.6 million of unpledged available-for-sale investment securities as an additional source of liquidity.
63

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
An important component of our ability to effectively respond to potential liquidity stress events is maintaining a cushion of highly liquid assets. Highly liquid assets are those that can be converted to cash quickly, with little or no loss in value, to meet financial obligations. ALCO policy guidelines define a ratio of highly liquid assets to total assets by graduated risk tolerance levels of minimal, moderate and high. At June 30, 2021, the Bank had $881.7 million in highly liquid assets, which consisted of $72.5 million in interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions, $102.3 million in FRB Excess Reserves, $697.6 million in unpledged securities, $9.3 million in mortgage loans held-for-sale. This resulted in highly liquid assets to total assets ratio of 21.4% at June 30, 2021.
If an extended recession caused large numbers of our deposit customers to withdraw their funds, we might become more reliant on volatile or more expensive sources of funding.
The following table provides detail of liquidity sources as of the periods presented:
(Dollars in Thousands)June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
Cash and Due From Banks$41,850 $38,535 
Interest-bearing Deposits in Other Financial Institutions72,538 39,954 
Federal Reserve Bank Excess Reserves102,263 163,453 
Unpledged Investment Securities697,606 632,724 
Excess Pledged Securities9,263 7,857 
FHLB Borrowing Availability547,881 510,533 
Unsecured Lines of Credit145,000 145,000 
Total Liquidity Sources$1,616,401 $1,538,056 
Regulatory Capital Requirements
Total shareholders’ equity decreased by $41.1 million to $399.1 million at June 30, 2021 compared to $440.2 million at December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily due to the $50.7 million cumulative-effect adjustment related to the adoption of Topic 326, a $5.6 million, net of tax, decrease in other comprehensive loss due to changes in the fair value of available-for-sale securities partially offset by net income of $14.8 million. The remaining difference of $0.5 million is related to stock-based compensation during the six months ended June 30, 2021.
The Company and the Bank are subject to various capital requirements administered by the federal banking regulators. Failure to meet the minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies. Quantitative measures established by regulations to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios as shown in the following table.
Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required. At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution’s category.
At June 30, 2021, the Bank continues to maintain its capital position with a leverage ratio of 10.21% as compared to the regulatory guideline of 5.00% to be well-capitalized and a risk-based Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of 13.37% compared to the regulatory guideline of 6.50% to be well-capitalized. The Bank’s risk-based Tier 1 and Total Capital ratios were 13.37% and 14.63%, respectively, which places the Bank above the federal bank regulatory agencies’ well-capitalized guidelines of 8.00% and 10.00%, respectively. We believe that we have the ability to raise additional capital, if necessary.
64

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (continued)
The final rules implementing Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. Banks (“Basel III rules”) became effective on January 1, 2015 with full compliance with all of the requirements being phased in over a multi-year schedule, and fully phased in by January 1, 2019. Under the Basel III rules, we must hold a capital conservation buffer above the adequately capitalized risk-based capital ratios. The capital conservation buffer was phased in at the rate of 0.625% per year and was 2.5% on January 1, 2019. Management believes as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which we are subject and satisfied the applicable capital conservation buffer requirements.
The following table summarizes risk-based capital amounts and ratios for the Company and the Bank for the dates presented:
(Dollars in Thousands)Adequately
Capitalized
Well
Capitalized
June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
AmountRatioAmountRatio
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
Leverage Ratio4.00 %NA$427,078 10.23 %$424,453 10.26 %
Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk-weighted Assets)4.50 %NA427,078 13.40 %424,453 13.08 %
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)6.00 %NA427,078 13.40 %424,453 13.08 %
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)8.00 %NA467,215 14.66 %465,198 14.33 %
Carter Bank & Trust
Leverage Ratio4.00 %5.00 %$426,191 10.21 %$423,832 10.24 %
Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk-weighted Assets)4.50 %6.50 %426,191 13.37 %423,832 13.06 %
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)6.00 %8.00 %426,191 13.37 %423,832 13.06 %
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)8.00 %10.00 %466,328 14.63 %464,578 14.31 %
The Company was incorporated on October 7, 2020, by and at the direction of the Board of Directors of the Bank, for the sole purpose of acquiring the Bank and serving as the Bank’s parent bank holding company pursuant to a corporate reorganization transaction (the “Reorganization”). The Reorganization was completed on November 20, 2020 pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization among the Bank, the Company and CBT Merger Sub, Inc., and the Bank survived the Reorganization as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In the Reorganization, each of the outstanding shares of the Bank’s common stock was converted into and exchanged for one newly issued share of the Company’s common stock.
In December 2018, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, (the “OCC”), the FRB, and the FDIC approved a final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under GAAP, including banking organizations’ implementation of CECL. The final rule provides banking organizations the option to phase in over a three-year period the day-one adverse effects on regulatory capital that may result from the adoption of the new accounting standard. On March 27, 2020, the regulators issued interim final rule (“IFR”), “Regulatory Capital Rule: Revised Transition of the Current Expected Credit Losses Methodology for Allowances” in response to the disrupted economic activity from the spread of COVID-19. The IFR maintains the three-year transition option in the previous rule and provides banks the option to delay for two years an estimate of CECL’s effect on regulatory capital, relative to the incurred loss methodology’s effect on regulatory capital, followed by a three-year transition period (five-year transition option). We adopted CECL effective January 1, 2021 and elected to implement the capital transition relief over the permissible three-year period.
Contractual Obligations
As of June 30, 2021, there have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of business to the contractual obligations disclosed in Part II, Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis," under the heading “Contractual Obligations” in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2021, there have been no material changes to the off-balance sheet arrangements disclosed in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis," under the heading "Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements" in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

65

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk
Market risk is defined as the degree to which changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, or equity prices can adversely affect a financial institution’s earnings or capital. For financial institutions, market risk primarily reflects exposures to changes in interest rates. Interest rate fluctuations affect earnings by changing net interest income and other interest-sensitive income and expense levels. Interest rate changes affect capital by changing the net present value of a financial institution’s future cash flows, and the cash flows themselves, as rates change. Accepting this risk is a normal part of banking and can be an important source of profitability and enhancement of shareholder value. However, excessive interest rate risk can threaten a financial institution’s earnings, capital, liquidity and solvency. Our sensitivity to changes in interest rate movements is continually monitored by the ALCO.
The ALCO utilizes an asset liability model (“ALM”) to monitor and manage market risk through net interest income simulation for various rate shock scenarios and economic value of equity (“EVE”), simulation for various rate shock scenarios. The rate shock scenarios used in the ALM span over multiple time horizons and yield curve shapes and include parallel and non-parallel shifts to ensure the ALCO can mitigate future earnings and market value fluctuations due to changes in market interest rates.
Within the context of the ALM, net interest income rate shock simulations explicitly measure the exposure to earnings from changes in market rates of interest over a defined time horizon. These robust simulations include assumptions of how the balance sheet will react in different rate environments including loan pre-payment speeds, average life of non-maturing deposits, and how sensitive each interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability is to changes in market rates (betas). Under simulation analysis, our current financial position is combined with assumptions regarding future business to calculate net interest income under various hypothetical rate scenarios. Reviewing these various measures provides us with a more comprehensive view of our interest rate risk profile.
Net interest income rate shock simulation results are compared to a base case to provide an estimate of the impact that market rate changes may have on 12 months and 24 months of pretax net interest income. The base case and rate shock analyses are performed on a static and growth balance sheet. A static balance sheet is a no growth balance sheet in which all maturing and/or repricing cash flows are reinvested in the same product at the existing product spread. Rate shock analyses assume an immediate parallel shift in market interest rates and also include management assumptions regarding the impact of interest rate changes on non-maturity deposit products (noninterest-bearing demand, interest-bearing demand, money market and savings) and changes in the prepayment behavior of loans and securities with optionality. Our policy guidelines limit the change in pretax net interest income over a 12-month horizon using rate shocks of +/- 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points. We have temporarily suspended the -100, -200, -300 and -400 basis point rate shock analyses. Due to the low interest rate environment, we believe the impact to net interest income when evaluating the -100, -200, -300 and -400 basis point rate shock scenarios does not provide meaningful insight into our interest rate risk position.
In order to monitor interest rate risk beyond the 24-month time horizon of rate shocks, we also perform EVE analyses. EVE represents the present value of all asset cash flows minus the present value of all liability cash flows. EVE rate change results are compared to a base case to determine the impact that market rate changes may have on our EVE. As with rate shock analysis, EVE analyses incorporate management assumptions regarding prepayment behavior of fixed rate loans and securities with optionality and the behavior and value of non-maturity deposit products. Our policy guidelines limit the change in EVE given changes in rates of +/- 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points. We have also temporarily suspended the EVE -100, -200, -300 and -400 basis point scenarios in 2020 and 2021 due to the low interest rate environment.
66

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK (continued)
The following tables reflect the net interest income rate shock analyses and EVE analyses results for the periods presented utilizing a forecasted static balance sheet over the next twelve months. All percentage changes presented are within prescribed ranges set by management.
June 30, 2021December 31, 2020
Change in Interest Rate (basis points)
% Change in Pretax Net Interest Income% Change in Economic Value of Equity% Change in Pretax Net Interest Income% Change in Economic Value of Equity
40038.8 %23.5 %39.6%20.1%
30029.9 %19.4 %30.7%17.5%
20020.7 %14.5 %21.1%13.8%
10010.4 %8.2 %10.7%8.1%
The results from the net interest income rate shock analysis are consistent with having an asset sensitive balance sheet, when adjusted for repricing correlations (betas). The above table indicates that in a rising interest rate environment, the Company is positioned to have increased pretax net interest income for the same asset base due to the balance sheet composition, related maturity structures and repricing correlations to market interest rates for assets and liabilities. Conversely, in a declining interest rate environment we are positioned to have decreased pretax net interest income for the same reasons discussed above.
In addition to rate shocks and EVE analyses, sensitivity analyses are performed to help us identify which model assumptions are critical and cause the greatest impact on pretax net interest income. Sensitivity analyses include changing prepayment behavior of loans and securities with optionality, repricing correlations, and the impact of interest rate changes on non-maturity deposit products (decay rates).
ITEM 4 - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) (its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2021. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including our CEO and CFO as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based on and as of the date of such evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in all material respects, as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2021 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
67

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1- LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to various legal and administrative proceedings and claims. Legal and administrative proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings could occur, and the timing and outcome of any legal or administrative proceeding cannot be predicted with certainty. Other than as set forth below, as of June 30, 2021, the Company is not involved in any other material pending legal proceedings other than proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business.
On May 31, 2021, the Bank and its directors were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia by James C. Justice, II, Cathy L. Justice, James C. Justice, III and various related entities that he and/or they own and control (such entities, the “Justice Entities” and collectively, the “Plaintiffs”). The allegations contained in the lawsuit relate to a series of loans (the “Loans”) made by the Bank to certain Justice Entities that are secured by collateral pledged by certain Justice Entities and are backed by personal guarantees from James C. Justice, II and Cathy L. Justice and, in certain cases, by personal guarantees from James C. Justice, III. In the lawsuit the Plaintiffs allege that the Bank (i) breached an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (ii) breached fiduciary duties of care and loyalty, and (iii) violated anti-tying restrictions of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and allege that the Bank’s directors aided and abetted breaches of fiduciary duties of care and loyalty by the Bank. The Plaintiffs seek monetary damages of $421 million, additional punitive damages and interest on damages as allowed by law, payment of costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees, and a declaratory judgment from the court that certain confessions of judgment, release and affirmation agreements, and forbearance agreements executed by the Plaintiffs in favor of the Bank and relating to the Loans and/or their origination, extension, restructuring or forbearance, are unenforceable.
The Company and the Bank deny the allegations contained in the lawsuit and intend to vigorously defend the matter and the validity of the confessions of judgment and release and affirmation agreements and forbearance agreements. Based on information presently available to the Company and the Bank and based on consultation with legal counsel, the Company believes that the Bank has meritorious defenses to all allegations contained in the lawsuit. However, because the lawsuit is in its early stages, no prediction can be made as to the outcome thereof.
ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS
As of June 30, 2021, there have been no material changes in the risk factors faced by the Company from those disclosed in our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K other than as provided below.
The Company is a defendant in a variety of litigation and other actions, which may have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operation or business.
The Company may be involved from time to time in a variety of litigation arising out of its business, and the Company operates in a legal and regulatory environment that exposes it to potential significant litigation risk. The Company’s insurance may not cover all claims that may be asserted against it in legal or administrative actions or costs that it may incur defending such actions, and any claims asserted against it, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm the Company’s reputation. Should the ultimate judgments or settlements and/or costs incurred in any litigation exceed any applicable insurance coverage, they could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operation for any period.
ITEM 2 – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3 - DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
ITEM 5 - OTHER INFORMATION
None.
68

Table of Contents
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION (continued)
ITEM 6 - EXHIBITS
Exhibits:
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and among Carter Bank & Trust, Cater Bankshares, Inc. and CBT Merger Sub, Inc. dated November 9, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 23, 2020)
Articles of Incorporation of Carter Bankshares, Inc., effective October 7, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 23, 2020)
Bylaws of Carter Bankshares, Inc., as adopted October 28, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 23, 2020)
Certification by principal executive officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith)
Certification by principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith)
Certification by principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (filed herewith)
101.INSInline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibits 101)
69

Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CARTER BANKSHARES, INC. (Registrant)
Date: August 5, 2021/s/ Litz H. Van Dyke
Litz H. Van Dyke
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 5, 2021/s/ Wendy S Bell
Wendy S. Bell
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
70