Chatham Lodging Trust - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-34693
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland | 27-1200777 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
50 Cocoanut Row, Suite 216 Palm Beach, Florida |
33480 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(561) 802-4477
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
* The registrant became subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, on April 15, 2010.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o
Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at November 8, 2010 | |
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest ($0.01 par value per share) | 9,208,750 |
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Investment in hotel properties, net |
$ | 154,040 | $ | | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
26,845 | 24 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
5,689 | | ||||||
Hotel receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of approximately $20 and $0, respectively) |
859 | | ||||||
Deferred costs, net |
1,047 | | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
592 | | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 189,072 | $ | 24 | ||||
Liabilities and Equity: |
||||||||
Debt |
$ | 12,410 | $ | | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
3,039 | 14 | ||||||
Accrued underwriter fees |
5,175 | | ||||||
Distributions payable |
1,657 | | ||||||
Total liabilities |
22,281 | 14 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Shareholders Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized and unissued at September 30, 2010 |
| | ||||||
Common shares, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares
authorized; 9,208,750 and 1,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively |
92 | | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
170,250 | 10 | ||||||
Unearned compensation |
(1,284 | ) | | |||||
Retained deficit |
(2,542 | ) | | |||||
Total shareholders equity |
166,516 | 10 | ||||||
Noncontrolling Interests: |
||||||||
Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership |
275 | | ||||||
Total equity |
166,791 | 10 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 189,072 | $ | 24 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||
Room |
$ | 8,147 | $ | 12,691 | ||||
Other operating |
237 | 350 | ||||||
Total revenues |
8,384 | 13,041 | ||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||
Hotel operating expenses: |
||||||||
Room |
1,925 | 2,995 | ||||||
Other operating |
3,002 | 4,597 | ||||||
Total hotel operating expenses |
4,927 | 7,592 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
798 | 1,200 | ||||||
Property taxes and insurance |
471 | 718 | ||||||
General and administrative |
1,368 | 2,340 | ||||||
Hotel property acquisition costs |
1,161 | 2,165 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
8,725 | 14,015 | ||||||
Operating loss |
(341 | ) | (974 | ) | ||||
Interest income |
72 | 109 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(19 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||
Loss before income tax expense |
(288 | ) | (884 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense |
| (46 | ) | |||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (288 | ) | $ | (930 | ) | ||
Earnings per Common Share Basic: |
||||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | ||
Earnings per Common Share Diluted: |
||||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | ||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
9,125,000 | 5,448,663 | ||||||
Diluted |
9,125,000 | 5,448,663 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
CHATHAM LODGING
TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(In thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(In thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
Noncontrolling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Total | Interest in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Shares | Paid-In | Unearned | Retained | Shareholders | Operating | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Compensation | Deficit | Equity | Partnership | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
1,000 | $ | | $ | 10 | $ | | $ | | $ | 10 | $ | | $ | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares, net of
offering costs of $13,752 |
9,125,000 | 91 | 168,657 | | | 168,748 | | 168,748 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares |
(1,000 | ) | | (10 | ) | | | (10 | ) | | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted shares |
87,000 | 1 | 1,654 | (1,655 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture of restricted shares |
(3,250 | ) | | (61 | ) | 61 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of share based
compensation |
| | | 310 | | 310 | 320 | 630 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends delcared on common
shares |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($0.175 per share) |
| | | | (1,612 | ) | (1,612 | ) | | (1,612 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on LTIP units
($0.175 per unit) |
| | | | | | (45 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | (930 | ) | (930 | ) | | (930 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2010 |
9,208,750 | $ | 92 | $ | 170,250 | $ | (1,284 | ) | $ | (2,542 | ) | $ | 166,516 | $ | 275 | $ | 166,791 | |||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
For the nine months ended | ||||
September 30, 2010 | ||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net loss |
$ | (930 | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash |
||||
provided by operating activities: |
||||
Depreciation |
1,182 | |||
Amortization of deferred costs |
18 | |||
Share based compensation |
630 | |||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||
Hotel receivables |
(350 | ) | ||
Deferred costs |
(862 | ) | ||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(168 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
2,201 | |||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
1,721 | |||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Improvements and additions to hotel properties |
(930 | ) | ||
Acquisition of hotel properties, net of cash acquired |
(144,609 | ) | ||
Restricted cash |
(3,047 | ) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(148,586 | ) | ||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||
Payments of debt |
(24 | ) | ||
Payment of financing costs |
(203 | ) | ||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares |
182,490 | |||
Payment of common share offering costs |
(8,577 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
173,686 | |||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
26,821 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
24 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 26,845 | ||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing information:
The Company has accrued underwriter fees of $5,175. These fees were paid on October 21, 2010.
The Company has accrued distributions payable of $1,657. These distributions were paid on October 29, 2010.
The Company assumed the mortgages on the purchase of the Altoona and Washington hotels for $12,434.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. Organization
Chatham Lodging Trust (the Company) was formed as a Maryland real estate investment trust
(REIT) on October 26, 2009 and intends to elect to qualify as a REIT for U.S. Federal Income Tax
purposes beginning with its short taxable year ending December 31, 2010. The Company is
internally-managed and was organized to invest primarily in premium-branded upscale extended-stay
and select-service hotels.
The Company completed its initial public offering (the IPO) on April 21, 2010. The IPO
resulted in the sale of 8,625,000 common shares at a $20.00 price per share, generating $172.5
million in gross proceeds. Net proceeds, after underwriters discounts and commissions and other
offering costs paid or payable to third parties as of September 30, 2010, were approximately $158.7
million. Concurrently with the closing of the IPO, in a separate private placement pursuant to
Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), the Company sold
500,000 of its common shares to Jeffrey H. Fisher, the Companys Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, at the public offering price of $20.00 per share, for proceeds to the Company of
$10 million.
The Company had no operations prior to the consummation of the IPO. Following the closing of
the IPO, the Company contributed the net proceeds from the IPO and the concurrent private placement
to Chatham Lodging, L.P (the Operating Partnership) in exchange for partnership interests in the
Operating Partnership. Substantially all of the Companys assets are held by and all of its
operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership. The Company is the sole general partner
of the Operating Partnership and currently owns 100% of the units of the limited partnership
interest in the Operating Partnership at September 30, 2010. As discussed in Note 10 Equity
Incentive Plan, certain of the Companys executive officers hold unvested long-term incentive plan
units in the Operating Partnership, which are presented as noncontrolling interests on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company owned 11 hotels with an aggregate of 1,381 rooms located
in 8 states. For the Company to qualify as a REIT, it cannot operate the hotels. Therefore, the
Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries lease the hotels to the Companys wholly owned taxable
REIT subsidiaries (the TRS). Each hotel is leased to a TRS under a percentage lease
that provides for rental payments equal to the greater of (i) a fixed base rent amount or (ii) a
percentage rent based on hotel room revenue. The initial term of each of the TRS leases is 5 years.
Lease revenue from each TRS and its wholly-owned subsidiaries is eliminated in consolidation.
Island Hospitality Management Inc. (IHM), a related party, manages 3 hotels, Homewood Suites
Management LLC (IAH Manager), a subsidiary of Hilton Worldwide Inc. (Hilton) manages 6 hotels
and Concord Hospitality Enterprises Company (Concord) manages 2 hotels.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and in conformity with
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) applicable to interim
financial information. These unaudited consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of
management, include all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the
consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of
equity, and consolidated statement of cash flows for the periods presented. Interim results are not
necessarily indicative of full year performance due to seasonal and other factors.
7
Table of Contents
The consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in
consolidation. Amounts included in the unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009
have been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet as of that date. The accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
balance sheet and notes thereto as of December 31, 2009 included in Amendment No. 7 to Form
S-11, which was filed with the SEC on April 5, 2010.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the balance
sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Investment in Hotel Properties
The Company allocates the purchase prices of hotel properties acquired based on the fair value
of the acquired real estate, furniture, fixtures and equipment, identifiable intangible assets and
assumed liabilities. In making estimates of fair value for purposes of allocating the purchase
price, the Company utilizes a number of sources of information that are obtained in connection with
the acquisition of a hotel property, including valuations performed by independent third parties
and information obtained about each hotel property resulting from pre-acquisition due diligence.
Hotel property acquisition costs, such as transfer taxes, title insurance, environmental and
property condition reviews, and legal and accounting fees, are expensed in the period incurred.
The Companys investments in hotel properties are carried at cost and are depreciated using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, 40 years for buildings, 15
years for building improvements, seven years for land improvements and three to ten years for
furniture, fixtures and equipment. Renovations and/or replacements at the hotel properties that
improve or extend the life of the assets are capitalized and depreciated over their useful lives,
while repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Upon the sale or retirement of property and
equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the Companys accounts
and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company will periodically review its hotel properties for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the hotel properties may not be
recoverable. Events or circumstances that may cause a review include, but are not limited to,
adverse changes in the demand for lodging at the properties due to declining national or local
economic conditions and/or new hotel construction in markets where the hotels are located. When
such conditions exist, management will perform an analysis to determine if the estimated
undiscounted future cash flows, without interest charges, from operations and the proceeds from the
ultimate disposition of a hotel property exceed its carrying value. If the estimated undiscounted
future cash flows are less than the carrying amount, an adjustment to reduce the carrying amount to
the related hotel propertys estimated fair market value is recorded and an impairment loss
recognized. The Company does not believe that there currently are any facts or circumstances
indicating impairment in the carrying value of any of its hotel properties.
The Company will consider a hotel property as held for sale when a binding agreement to
purchase the property has been signed under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of
nonrefundable cash, no significant financing contingencies exist which could cause the transaction
not to be completed in a timely manner and the sale is expected to occur within one year. If these
criteria are met, depreciation and amortization of the hotel property will cease and an impairment
loss if any will be recognized if the fair value of the hotel property, less the costs to sell, is
lower than the carrying amount of the hotel property. The Company will classify the loss, together
with the related operating results, as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of
operations and classify the assets and related liabilities as held for sale in the consolidated
balance sheets. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had no hotel properties held for sale.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, demand deposits with financial institutions
and short term liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash balances
in individual banks may exceed federally insurable limits.
8
Table of Contents
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents purchase price deposits held in escrow for potential hotel
acquisitions currently under contract and escrows for reserves required pursuant to the Companys
loans or management agreements with Hilton.
Included in restricted cash on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at September 30,
2010 are deposits for hotel acquisitions of $2.6 million and $3.1 million of other escrows. The
hotel mortgage loan agreements require the Company to fund 4% of gross revenues on a monthly basis
for furnishings, fixtures, equipment and general repair maintenance reserve (Replacement Reserve)
of the hotels in an account to be held by Berkadia Commercial Mortgage (Lender). In
addition, insurance and real estate tax reserves are required to be deposited into an escrow
account to be held by Lender.
Hotel Receivables
Hotel receivables consist of amounts owed by guests staying at the Companys hotels at quarter
end and amounts due from business and group customers. An allowance for doubtful accounts is
provided and maintained at a level believed to be adequate to absorb estimated probable receivable
losses. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $20
thousand and $0, respectively.
Deferred Costs
Deferred costs consist of franchise agreement fees for the Companys hotels and deferred loan
costs. Franchise fees are recorded at cost and amortized over a straight-line basis over the term
of the franchise agreements. Loan costs are recorded at cost and amortized over a straight-line
basis which approximates the interest rate method over the term of the loan. Amortization expense
was $13 thousand and $18 thousand for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
The Companys prepaid expenses and other assets consist of prepaid insurance, deposits and
hotel supplies inventory.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from hotel operations are recognized when rooms are occupied and when services are
provided. Revenues consist of amounts derived from hotel operations, including sales from room,
meeting room, gift shop, in-room movie and other ancillary amenities. Sales, use, occupancy, and
similar taxes are collected and presented on a net basis (excluded from revenues) in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company measures compensation expense for the restricted share awards based upon the fair
market value of its common shares at the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period and is included in general and administrative expense
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company will pay dividends on
nonvested restricted shares.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income (loss) available for
common shareholders, adjusted for dividends on unvested share grants, by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income
(loss) available for common shareholders, adjusted for dividends on unvested share grants, by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potentially dilutive securities such as
share grants or shares issuable in the event of conversion of operating partnership units. No
adjustment is made for shares that are anti-dilutive during the period. The Companys restricted
share awards and long-term incentive plan units are entitled to receive dividends, if declared.
The rights to dividends declared are non-forfeitable, and therefore, the unvested restricted shares
and long-term incentive plan units qualify as participating securities requiring the allocation of
earnings under the two-class method to calculate EPS. The percentage of earnings allocated to the
unvested restricted shares is based on the proportion of the weighted average unvested restricted
shares outstanding to the total of the basic weighted average common shares outstanding and the
weighted average unvested restricted shares outstanding. Basic EPS is then computed by
9
Table of Contents
dividing income less earnings allocable to unvested restricted shares by the basic weighted average number
of shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed similar to basic EPS, except the weighted average
number of shares outstanding is increased to include the effect of potentially dilutive securities.
Because the Company reported a net loss for the periods, no allocation was made to the unvested
restricted shares or the long-term incentive plan units.
Income Taxes
The Company is currently subject to corporate federal and state income taxes. Prior to April
21, 2010, the Company had no operating results subject to taxation.
The Company intends to elect to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes under
Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet
certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least
90% of the Companys annual REIT taxable income to its shareholders (which is computed without
regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain, and which does not necessarily equal
net income as calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP). As a REIT, the Company generally will not
be subject to federal income tax to the extent it distributes qualifying dividends to its
shareholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to
federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates, and generally will
not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four
taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost, unless the Internal Revenue
Service grants the Company relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could
materially adversely affect the Companys net income and net cash available for distribution to
shareholders. However, the Company intends to organize and operate in such a manner as to qualify
for treatment as a REIT.
The
Company leases its hotels to lessee subsidiaries of the TRS (TRS lessees). The TRS is subject to federal
and state income taxes and the Company accounts for taxes, where applicable, in accordance with the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 740 using the
asset and liability method which recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax
consequences arising from differences between financial statement carrying amounts and income tax
bases.
Organizational and Offering Costs
The Company expenses organizational costs as incurred. Offering costs, which include selling
commissions, are recorded as a reduction in additional paid-in capital in shareholders equity.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended guidance
related to the consolidation of variable-interest entities, which requires enterprises to
qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity
(VIE) based on whether the entity (1) has the power to direct matters that most significantly
impact the activities of the VIE, and (2) has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The amendments change
the consideration of kick-out rights in determining if an entity is a VIE which may cause certain
additional entities to now be considered VIEs. Additionally, they require an ongoing
reconsideration of the primary beneficiary and provide a framework for the events that trigger a
reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. This guidance is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company analyzed and considered the
structure of each of its management agreements with its hotel managers and determined that it had
appropriately consolidated the results of operations of the 11 owned hotels at September 30, 2010.
3. Acquisition of Hotel Properties
Acquisition of Hotel Properties
On April 23, 2010, wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisition of six
hotel properties (the Initial Acquisition Hotels) from wholly owned subsidiaries of RLJ
Development, LLC for an aggregate purchase price of $73.5 million, plus customary pro-rated amounts
and closing costs. Each of the Initial Acquisition Hotels operates under the Homewood Suites by
Hilton® brand. The Initial Acquisition Hotels contain an aggregate of 813 rooms and are located in
the
10
Table of Contents
major metropolitan statistical areas of Boston, Massachusetts; Minneapolis, Minnesota;
Nashville, Tennessee; Dallas, Texas; Hartford, Connecticut and Orlando, Florida.
On July 2, 2010, the Company acquired the 120-room Hampton Inn & Suites®
Houston-Medical Center in Houston, Texas (the Houston hotel) for $16.5 million, plus customary
pro-rated amounts and closing costs, from Moody National 1715 OST Houston S, LLC.
On August 3, 2010, the Company acquired the 124-room Residence Inn by Marriott® -
Long Island Holtsville on Long Island, New York (the Holtsville hotel) for $21.3 million, plus
customary pro-rated amounts and closing costs, from Holtsville Hotel Group, LLC and FB Holtsville
Utility LLC.
On August 24, 2010, the Company completed the acquisitions of the 105-room Courtyard by
Marriott® in Altoona, Pennsylvania (the Altoona hotel) and the 86-room SpringHill Suites by Marriott®
in Washington, Pennsylvania (the Washington hotel) for a total cash purchase price of $23.3 million,
plus customary pro-rated amounts and closing costs, including the assumption of $12.4 million of
debt on the Hotels. The Altoona hotel was purchased from Moody National CY Altoona PA, LLC and the
Washington hotel was purchased from Moody National SHS Washington PA, LLC.
On September 23, 2010, the Company acquired the 133-room Residence Inn by Marriott®
- White Plains in White Plains, New York (the White Plains hotel) for $24.4 million, plus customary
pro-rated amounts and closing costs, from Moody National White Plains S, LLC.
Hotel Management Agreements
The Initial Acquisition Hotels are managed by the IAH Manager, a subsidiary of Hilton. A
TRS lessee assumed each of the existing hotel management agreements for these
hotels. Each hotel management agreement previously became effective on December 20, 2000, has an
initial term of 15 years and is renewable for an additional five-year period at the IAH Managers
option by written notice to the Company no later than 120 days prior to the expiration of the
initial term. Under the hotel management agreements, the IAH Manager receives a base management fee
equal to 2% of the hotels gross room revenue and, if certain financial thresholds are met or
exceeded, an incentive management fee equal to 10% of the hotels net operating income, less fixed
costs, base management fees, agreed-upon return on the owners original investment and debt service
payments. Prior to April 23, 2013, each of these six management agreements may be terminated for
cause, including the failure of the managed hotel to meet specified performance levels, and may be
terminated by the manager in the event the Company undergoes a change in control. If the new owner
does not assume the existing management agreements and does not obtain a Homewood Suites franchise
license upon such a change of control, the Company will be required to pay a termination fee to the
IAH Manager. Beginning on April 23, 2013, the Company may terminate the six Hilton management
agreements upon six months notice to the manager.
The Houston, Holtsville and White Plains hotels are managed by IHM, a hotel management company
90 percent-owned by Jeffrey H. Fisher, the Companys chief executive officer, pursuant to
management agreements between a TRS lessee and IHM. The management agreements with IHM are for a five-year
term and provide for base management fees of 3% of the hotels gross room revenue and incentive
management fees of 10% of net operating income in excess of a return threshold as defined in the
agreements plus a monthly accounting fee of $1 thousand per hotel property. Incentive management
fees are capped at 1% of gross hotel revenue. IHM may extend the management agreements for two
additional 5-year renewal terms upon 90 days written notice to the Company. The management
agreements may be terminated upon the sale of the hotels for no termination fee upon six months
advance notice. The management agreements may also be terminated for cause, including the failure
of the hotels operating performance to meet specified levels.
The Altoona and Washington hotels are managed by Concord pursuant to management agreements
between a TRS lessee and Concord. The management agreements with Concord provide for base management fees
equal to 4% of the managed hotels gross room revenue. The initial ten-year term of each
management agreement is set to expire on February 28, 2017 and will renew automatically for
successive one-year terms unless terminated by the TRS or Concord by written notice to the other
party no later than 90 days prior to the terms expiration. The management agreements may be
terminated for cause, including the failure of the hotels operating performance to meet specified
levels.
11
Table of Contents
Hotel Franchise Agreements
The Companys TRS lessees have entered into franchise agreements for its 11 hotels.
Upon acquisition of the Initial Acquisition Hotels, a TRS lessee entered into new hotel
franchise agreements with Promus Hotels, Inc., a subsidiary of Hilton, as manager for these hotels.
Each of the new hotel franchise agreements has an initial term of 15 years and may be renewed for
an additional 5-year term. These Hilton hotel franchise agreements provide for a franchise royalty
fee equal to 4% of the hotels gross room revenue and a program fee equal to 4% of the hotels
gross room revenue. The Hilton franchise agreements generally have no termination rights unless the
franchisee fails to cure an event of default in accordance with the franchise agreements.
Certain of the Companys TRS lessees have entered into franchise agreements with Marriott
International, Inc. (Marriott), relating to the Residence Inn properties in Holtsville, New York,
and White Plains, New York, in addition to a Courtyard property in Altoona, Pennsylvania and a
SpringHill Suites property in Washington, Pennsylvania. These franchise agreements have initial
terms ranging from 15 to 20 years and will expire between 2025 and 2030. None of the agreements has
a renewal option. The Marriott franchise agreements provide for franchise fees ranging from 5.0% to
5.5% of the hotels gross room sales and marketing fees equal to 2.5% of the hotels gross room
sales. The Marriott franchise agreements are terminable by Marriott in the event that the
applicable franchisee fails to cure an event of default or, in certain circumstances such as the
franchisees bankruptcy or insolvency, are terminable by Marriott at will.
The Hampton Inn & Suites Houston-Medical Center is governed by a franchise agreement with
Hampton Inns Franchise LLC, or Hampton Inns. The franchise agreement has an initial term of
approximately 10 years and expires on July 31, 2020. There is no renewal option. The Hampton Inns
franchise agreement provides for a monthly program fee equal to 4% of the hotels gross rooms
revenue and a monthly royalty fee equal to 5% of the hotels gross rooms revenue. Hampton Inns may
terminate the franchise agreement in the event that the franchisee fails to cure an event of
default or, in certain circumstances such as the franchisees bankruptcy or insolvency, Hampton
Inns may terminate the agreement at will.
Franchise fees were
approximately $0.6 million and $1.0 million for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010.
Hotel Purchase Price Allocation
The allocation of the purchase price to the hotels based on their fair value, were as follows
(in thousands):
Hampton Inn & | ||||||||||||||||||||
Initial | Suites | Residence Inn | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition | Houston | Holtsville | Moody Three | |||||||||||||||||
Hotels | Houston, TX | Holtsville, NY | Portfolio | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Land |
$ | 12,120 | $ | 3,200 | $ | 2,200 | $ | 3,200 | $ | 20,720 | ||||||||||
Building and improvements |
57,976 | 12,708 | 18,765 | 39,099 | 128,548 | |||||||||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
3,421 | 325 | 335 | 943 | 5,024 | |||||||||||||||
Cash |
30 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 41 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
| | | 2,642 | 2,642 | |||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
379 | 24 | | 106 | 509 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
31 | | 83 | 310 | 424 | |||||||||||||||
Debt |
| | | (12,434 | ) | (12,434 | ) | |||||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(440 | ) | (148 | ) | (56 | ) | (180 | ) | (824 | ) | ||||||||||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 73,517 | $ | 16,111 | $ | 21,329 | $ | 33,693 | $ | 144,650 | ||||||||||
Net assets acquired, net of cash |
$ | 73,487 | $ | 16,109 | $ | 21,327 | $ | 33,686 | $ | 144,609 | ||||||||||
The Altoona, Washington and White Plains hotels were acquired from
parties under common control and their acquisition is referred to the Moody Three Portfolio in
the above chart.
All of the Companys hotel revenue and expenses are comprised of hotel revenue and expenses
from the hotels acquired during the year to date September 30, 2010.
12
Table of Contents
Pro Forma Financial Information
The following condensed pro forma financial information presents the results of operations as
if the acquisition of the Initial Acquisition, Houston, Holtsville, Altoona, Washington and White
Plains hotels had taken place on January 1, 2010. Since the Company commenced operations on April
21, 2010 upon completion of the IPO, pro forma adjustments have been included for corporate general
and administrative expense and income taxes for the periods presented. The pro forma results have
been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what actual
results of operations would have been had the acquisition taken place on January 1, 2010, nor do
they purport to represent the results of operations for future periods (in thousands, except share
and per share data).
For the nine months ended | ||||
September 30, 2010 | ||||
Pro forma total revenues |
$ | 32,503 | ||
Pro forma total hotel expense |
19,542 | |||
Pro forma total operating expenses |
32,063 | |||
Pro forma operating income |
440 | |||
Pro forma net loss |
$ | (477 | ) | |
Pro forma loss income per share: |
||||
Basic and diluted |
$ | (0.05 | ) | |
Weighted average Common Shares Outstanding |
||||
Basic and diluted |
9,125,000 |
4. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts at a level believed to be adequate to
absorb estimated probable losses. That estimate is based on past loss experience, current economic
and market conditions and other relevant factors. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $20
thousand and $0 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
5. Investment in Hotel Properties
The Company did not own any hotel properties at December 31, 2009. Investment in hotel
properties as of September 30, 2010, consisted of the following (in thousands):
September 30, 2010 | ||||
Land and improvements |
$ | 20,720 | ||
Building and improvements |
128,546 | |||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
5,956 | |||
155,222 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(1,182 | ) | ||
Investment in hotel properties, net |
$ | 154,040 | ||
6. Debt
The Company assumed a $7.0 million loan on the Altoona hotel and a $5.4 million loan on the
Washington hotel in connection with their acquisition. Each loan is collateralized by the hotel and
requires a minimum debt service coverage ratio and the Company was in compliance with these
covenants at September 30, 2010. Key information regarding the loans is as
follows (in thousands):
13
Table of Contents
Altoona Loan | Washington Loan | |||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 6,966 | $ | 5,444 | ||||
Interest rate |
5.96 | % | 5.84 | % | ||||
Maturity |
April 1, 2016 | April 1, 2015 | ||||||
Monthly principal and interest payment |
$ | 49 | $ | 39 | ||||
Minimum debt service coverage ratio |
1.5 | x | 1.65 | x |
7. Dividends Declared and Paid
The Company declared common share dividends of $0.175 per share and distributions on LTIP
units of $0.175 per LTIP unit for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The dividends and
distributions were paid on October 29, 2010 to common shareholders and LTIP unit holders of record on October 15, 2010.
The Company did not pay any dividends during the three months ended September 30, 2010.
8. Shareholders Equity
Under the initial Declaration of Trust of the Company, the total number of shares initially
authorized for issuance was 1,000 common shares. On October 30, 2009, the Company issued the sole
shareholder of the Company 1,000 common shares at $10.00 per share. Following the close of the IPO, the Company repurchased the
1,000 shares in October 2009 at his cost of $10.00 per share.
Effective March 31, 2010, the Companys Declaration of Trust was amended and restated to
authorize the issuance of 500,000,000 common shares and 100,000,000 preferred shares. On April 21,
2010, the Company completed its IPO. The IPO resulted in the sale of 8,625,000 common shares at a
$20.00 price per share, generating $172.5 million in gross proceeds. Net proceeds, after net
underwriters discounts and commissions and other offering costs, were approximately $158.7
million. Underwriting discounts and offering costs of $13.8 million have been recorded as a
reduction in additional paid-in capital. This includes underwriters commission of $5.2 million
which, in accordance with the underwriting agreement entered into in connection with the IPO, is
payable once the Company invests at least 85% of the net proceeds from the offering in hotel
properties. Payment was made on October 21, 2010. Concurrently with the closing of the IPO, in a
separate private placement pursuant to Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
the Company sold 500,000 of its common shares to Jeffrey H. Fisher, the Companys Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer, at the public offering price of $20.00 per share, for
proceeds to the Company of $10 million. There were no
preferred shares issued or outstanding as of September 30, 2010.
14
Table of Contents
9. Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the amounts used in calculating basic and diluted net
loss per share (in thousands, except share and per share data):
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (288 | ) | $ | (930 | ) | ||
Dividends paid on unvested restricted shares |
| | ||||||
Undistributed earnings attributable to unvested
restricted shares |
| | ||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders excluding
amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares |
$ | (288 | ) | $ | (930 | ) | ||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares basic |
9,125,000 | 5,448,663 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||
Unvested restricted shares |
| | ||||||
Compensation-related shares |
| | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares diluted |
9,125,000 | 5,448,663 | ||||||
Basic Earnings per Common Share: |
||||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
per weighted average common share excluding
amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | ||
Diluted Earnings per Common Share: |
||||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
per weighted average common share excluding
amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | ||
10. Equity Incentive Plan
On April 9, 2010, the Companys sole shareholder approved the Equity Incentive Plan (the
Equity Incentive Plan) to attract and retain independent trustees, executive officers and other
key employees and service providers. The Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of options to
purchase common shares, share awards, share appreciation rights, performance units and other
equity-based awards, including grants of restricted common shares and long-term incentive plan
units (LTIP Units). Share awards under this plan generally vest over a period of three to five
years based on continued employment. The Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation
Committee of the Companys Board of Trustees (the Compensation Committee), which has the ability to
approve all terms of awards under the Equity Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee also has
the ability to approve who will receive grants under the Equity Incentive Plan and the number of
common shares subject to the grant. The Equity Incentive Plan is scheduled to terminate on April 8,
2020.
The number of common shares authorized for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan is
565,359. In connection with share splits, dividends, recapitalizations and certain other events,
the Companys Board of Trustees will make adjustments that it deems appropriate in the aggregate
number of common shares that may be issued under the Equity Incentive Plan and the terms of
outstanding awards. On April 21, 2010, the Companys Operating Partnership granted 246,960 LTIP
Units to the Companys executive officers pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, on
April 26, 2010 and May 20, 2010, the Company issued 40,000 and 36,550 restricted common shares to
the Companys Independent Trustees and executive officers, respectively, pursuant to the Equity
Incentive Plan. During the third quarter, 7,200 shares granted to the Companys former Chief
Financial Officer (CFO) vested, 3,250 restricted shares granted to the Companys former CFO were forfeited
and 15,435 LTIP Units granted to the Companys former CFO were forfeited. Also, during the third
quarter 10,450 restricted common shares and 26,250 LTIP Units were granted to the Companys current
CFO. As of September 30, 2010,
there were 223,834 common shares available for future grant under
the Equity Incentive Plan.
15
Table of Contents
Restricted Share Awards
The Company measures compensation expense for restricted share awards based upon the fair
market value of its common shares at the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period and is included in general and administrative expense
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company will pay dividends on
nonvested restricted shares.
A summary of the Companys restricted share awards for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 is as follows:
Weighted - | ||||||||
Number of | Average Grant | |||||||
Shares | Date Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2010 |
| $ | | |||||
Granted |
87,000 | 19.02 | ||||||
Vested |
(7,200 | ) | 18.86 | |||||
Forfeited |
(3,250 | ) | 18.86 | |||||
Nonvested at September 30, 2010 |
76,550 | $ | 19.04 | |||||
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were $1.3 million and $0,
respectively, of unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted share awards. As of
September 30, 2010, these costs were expected to be recognized over a weightedaverage period of
approximately 2.6 years. For each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
Company recognized approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in expense related to
the restricted share awards. This expense is included in general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of September 30, 2010, 7,200 shares were
vested.
Long-Term Incentive Plan Units
LTIP Units are a special class of partnership interests in the Operating Partnership which may
be issued to eligible participants for the performance of services to or for the benefit of the
Company. Under the Equity Incentive Plan, each LTIP Unit issued is deemed equivalent to an award of
one common share thereby reducing the availability for other equity awards on a one-for-one basis.
The Company will not receive a tax deduction for the value of any LTIP Units granted to employees.
LTIP Units, whether vested or not, will receive the same per unit profit distributions as other
outstanding units of the Operating Partnership, which profit distribution will generally equal per
share dividends on the Companys common shares. Initially, LTIP Units have a capital account
balance of zero, and will not have full parity with common Operating Partnership units with respect
to liquidating distributions. The Operating Partnership will revalue its assets upon the occurrence
of certain specified events and any increase in valuation will be allocated first to the holders of
LTIP Units to equalize the capital accounts of such holders with the capital accounts of the
Operating Partnership unit holders. If such parity is reached, vested LTIP Units may be converted,
at any time, into an equal number of common units of limited partnership interest in the Operating
Partnership (OP Units), which may, in the Companys sole and absolute discretion, be redeemed by
the Company for cash or exchanged for an equivalent number of the Companys common shares.
On April 21, 2010, the Companys Operating Partnership granted 246,960 LTIP Units to the
Companys executive officers pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan, all of which are accounted for
in accordance with FASB Codification Topic (ASC) 718, Stock Compensation. The LTIP Units
granted to the Companys executive officers vest ratably over a five-year period beginning on the
date of grant. On September 9, 2010, the Companys Operating Partnership granted 26,250 LTIP units
to the Companys new CFO and 15,435 LTIP units granted to the Companys former CFO were forfeited.
The LTIP Units fair value was determined by using a discounted value approach. In determining
the discounted value of the LTIP Units, the Company considered the inherent uncertainty that the
LTIP Units would never reach parity with the other OP Units and thus have an economic value of zero
to the grantee. Additional factors considered in reaching the assumptions of uncertainty included
discounts for illiquidity; expectations for future dividends; no operating history as of the date
of the grant; significant dependency on the efforts and services of our executive officers and
other key members of management to implement the Companys business plan; available acquisition
opportunities; and economic environment and conditions. The Company used an expected stabilized
dividend yield of 5.0% and a risk free interest rate of 2.33% based on
a five-year U.S. Treasury yield.
16
Table of Contents
The Company recorded $0.2 million and $0.3 million in compensation expense related to the LTIP
Units for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. As of September 30,
2010, there was $3.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to LTIP Units. This
cost is expected to be recognized over 4.6 years, which represents the weighted average remaining
vesting period of the LTIP Units. As of September 30, 2010, none of the LTIP Units have reached
parity.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The nature of the operations of the hotels exposes the hotels, the Company and the Operating
Partnership to the risk of claims and litigation in the normal course of their business. The
Company is not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to the Companys knowledge, is any
litigation threatened.
Hotel Ground Rent
The Altoona hotel is subject to a ground lease with an expiration date of April 30, 2029 with
an option of up to 12 additional terms of five years each. Monthly payments are determined by the
quarterly average room occupancy of the hotel as follows with base rent equal to $5,500 per month
which shall be increased on an annual basis by two and one-half percent (2.5%):
Avg Occupancy | Lease Amount | |
> 85% |
Base Rent | |
85% but less than 90% |
$4/room/day | |
90% but less than 100% |
$5/room/day | |
100% |
$6/room/day |
The following is a schedule of the minimum future obligation payments required under the
ground lease (in thousands):
2010 |
82 | |||
2011 |
84 | |||
2012 |
87 | |||
2013 |
89 | |||
2014 |
91 | |||
Thereafter |
1,992 | |||
Total |
2,425 | |||
Condo Leases
The White Plains hotel is part of a condominium known as La Reserva Condominium (the
Condominium). The Condominium is comprised of 143 residential units and four commercial units.
The four commercial units are owned by the Company and are part of the White Plains Hotel. The
White Plains Hotel is comprised of 129 of the residential units owned by the Company and four
residential units leased by the Company from unaffiliated third party owners. The remaining 10
residential units are owned and occupied by unaffiliated third party owners.
The Company leases 4 residential units in the White Plains hotel from individual owners (the
Condo Owner). The lease agreements are for 6 years with a one-time 5 year renewal option. The
White Plains hotel shall have the right to sublease the unit to any third party (a Hotel Guest)
for such rent and on such terms as the White Plains hotel may
determine. Each Condo Owner may reserve the unit for seven (7) days in any calendar quarter
or two (2) weeks in any calendar year. The White Plains hotel will have no obligation to pay rent
during such period. Each Condo Owner is also
17
Table of Contents
obligated to reimburse the White Plains hotel for renovations that were completed in 2008.
Minimum annual rents payable to the Condo Owner are approximately $70 thousand per year and amounts
receivable from the Condo Owner for its renovation reimbursements are approximately $11 thousand
per year, subject to a balloon repayment at the end of the lease term of any remaining
reimbursements. The White Plains hotel is responsible for paying assessments to the Condominium
association on a monthly basis for all residential units owned and leased. The White Plains hotel
provides certain services to the Condominium association for housekeeping, maintenance and certain
other services and receives compensation from the Condominium association for said services.
12. Related Party Transactions
The Company paid $3.2 million to reimburse Mr. Fisher for expenses he incurred in connection
with the Companys formation and the IPO, including $2.5 million he funded as earnest money
deposits for the Companys purchase of the Initial Acquisition Hotels. Mr. Fisher had also advanced
$14 thousand to the Company which was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 which was reimbursed following the
close of the IPO.
Mr. Fisher owns 90% of Island Hospitality Management, Inc. (IHM), a hotel management
company. The Company has entered into hotel management agreements with IHM to manage three of its
hotels. Management and accounting fees paid to IHM for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2010 were $69 thousand.
13. Subsequent Events
On October 5, 2010, the Company acquired the 124-room Residence Inn by Marriott® -
New Rochelle in New Rochelle, New York for $21 million, plus customary pro-rated amounts and
closing costs, from New Roc Hotels, LLC. The hotel will be managed by IHM pursuant to a 5-year
management agreement.
On October 12, 2010, the REIT, as parent guarantor and the Operating Partnership, as borrower
(the Borrower), entered into a $85.0 million, three-year, secured revolving credit agreement (the
Credit Agreement) with the lenders party thereto, Barclays Capital and Regions Capital Markets as
joint lead arrangers, Barclays Bank PLC as administrative agent, Regions Bank as syndication agent,
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, UBS Securities and US Bank National Association
acting as co-documentation agents.
Subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement, the Borrower may
increase the original principal amount of the Credit Agreement by an additional $25.0 million.
Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Company and certain indirect subsidiaries of the Company
guarantee to the Lenders all of the obligations of the Borrower under the Credit Agreement, any
notes and the other loan documents, including any obligations under hedging arrangements. From time
to time, the Borrower may be required to cause additional subsidiaries to become guarantors under
the Credit Agreement.
Availability under the Credit Agreement is based on the least of the following: (i) the
aggregate commitments of all Lenders, (ii) a percentage of the as-is appraised value of
qualifying borrowing base properties (subject to certain concentration limitations and other
deductions) and (iii) a percentage of net operating income from qualifying borrowing base
properties (subject to certain limitations and other deductions). The Credit Agreement is secured
by each borrowing base property, including all personal property assets related thereto, and the
equity interests of borrowing base entities and certain other subsidiaries of the Company. There
are currently seven properties in the borrowing base under the Credit Agreement.
The Credit Agreement provides for revolving credit loans to the Company. All borrowings under
the Credit Agreement will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at the option of the Company,
(i) the greater of (A) 1.25% plus a margin that fluctuates based upon the Companys leverage ratio
or (B) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus a margin that fluctuates based
upon the Companys leverage ratio; or (ii) the greatest of (A) 2.25%, (B) the prime lending rate as
set forth on the Reuters Screen RTRTSY1 (or such other comparable publicly available rate if such
rate no longer appears on the Reuters Screen RTRTSY1), (C) the weighted average of the rates on
overnight federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by federal
funds brokers, plus 1/2 of 1%, or (D) 1% plus the Eurodollar Rate (as
defined in the Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement also permits the issuance of letters of
credit and provides for swing line loans.
18
Table of Contents
The Credit Agreement contains representations, warranties, covenants, terms and conditions
customary for transactions of this type, including a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio and minimum net worth financial covenants, limitations on (i) liens, (ii) incurrence
of debt, (iii) investments, (iv) distributions, and (v) mergers and asset dispositions, covenants
to preserve corporate existence and comply with laws, covenants on the use of proceeds of the
credit facility and default provisions, including defaults for non-payment, breach of
representations and warranties, insolvency, non-performance of covenants, cross-defaults and
guarantor defaults. The occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Agreement could result
in all loans and other obligations becoming immediately due and payable and the credit facility
being terminated and allow the Lenders to exercise all rights and remedies available to them with
respect to the collateral.
On November 3, 2010, the Company acquired the 145-room Homewood Suites by Hilton
Carlsbad-North San Diego County in Carlsbad, CA for $32.0 million, plus customary pro-rated amounts
and closing costs, from Royal Hospitality Washington, LLC and Lee Estates, LLC. The Hotel will be
managed by IHM pursuant to a 5-year management agreement.
The allocation of the purchase price of the hotels acquired after September 30, 2010 is based
on preliminary estimates of fair value as follows (in thousands):
Residence Inn | Homewood Suites | |||||||||||
New Rochelle | Carlsbad, CA | Total | ||||||||||
Acquistion date |
10/05/10 | 11/04/10 | ||||||||||
Land |
$ | | $ | 3,900 | $ | 3,900 | ||||||
Building and improvements |
20,281 | 27,520 | 47,801 | |||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
434 | 580 | 1,014 | |||||||||
Cash |
3 | 4 | 7 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
46 | | 46 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
170 | 9 | 179 | |||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(36 | ) | (13 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 20,898 | $ | 32,000 | $ | 52,898 | ||||||
Net assets acquired, net of cash |
$ | 20,895 | $ | 31,996 | $ | 52,891 | ||||||
The following condensed pro forma financial information presents the results of
operations as if the Residence Inn by Marriott® New Rochelle in New Rochelle, New York
was acquired on January 1, 2010. Pro forma information for the Homewood Suites by
Hilton® Carlsbad-North San Diego County in Carlsbad, CA is unavailable at this time and
has not been included. Since the Company commenced operations on April 21, 2010 upon completion of
the IPO, pro forma adjustments have been included for corporate general and administrative expense
and income taxes for the periods presented. The pro forma results have been prepared for
comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what actual results of operations
would have been had the acquisition taken place on January 1, 2010, nor do they purport to
represent the results of operations for future periods (in thousands, except share and per share
data).
For the nine months ended | ||||
September 30, 2010 | ||||
Pro forma total revenues |
$ | 17,682 | ||
Pro forma total hotel expense |
10,477 | |||
Pro forma total operating expenses |
20,391 | |||
Pro forma operating income |
(2,709 | ) | ||
Pro forma net loss |
$ | (2,592 | ) | |
Pro forma net loss per share: |
||||
Basic and diluted |
$ | (0.28 | ) | |
Weighted average Common Shares Outstanding |
||||
Basic and diluted |
9,125,000 |
19
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
The following information contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements
include information about possible or assumed future results of the lodging industry, our business,
financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, cash flow and plans and objectives. These
statements generally are characterized by the use of the words believe, expect, anticipate,
estimate, plan, continue, intend, should, may or similar expressions. Although we
believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon
reasonable assumptions, our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the
forward-looking statements. Some factors that might cause such a difference include the following:
the current global economic downturn, increased direct competition, changes in government
regulations or accounting rules, changes in local, national and global real estate conditions,
declines in the lodging industry, seasonality of the lodging industry, our ability to obtain lines
of credit or permanent financing on satisfactory terms, changes in interest rates, availability of
proceeds from offerings of our common shares, our ability to identify suitable investments, our
ability to close on identified investments and inaccuracies of our accounting estimates. Given
these uncertainties, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no
obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements
that may be made to reflect future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events. The forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risk factors
identified in the Risk Factors section of our Registration Statement on Form S-11, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC.
Overview
We are a self-advised hotel investment company organized in October 2009. We raised gross
proceeds of $172.5 million upon completion of our initial public offering of common shares (IPO)
on April 21, 2010. We raised an additional $10 million through a concurrent private placement of
our common shares with Jeffrey H. Fisher, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. We
had no operating assets on the date of our IPO.
Our investment strategy is to invest in premium-branded upscale extended-stay and
select-service hotels in geographically diverse markets with high barriers to entry near strong
demand generators. We may acquire portfolios of hotels or single hotel transactions. Consistent
with our investment strategy, on April 23, 2010, two days after the completion of our IPO, we
invested $73.5 million of the offering proceeds in the acquisition of a portfolio of six Homewood
Suites by Hilton® hotels. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we acquired
five additional hotels comprising an aggregate of 568 rooms for approximately $82.3 million, funded
by proceeds from our IPO and the assumption of $12.4 million of debt on two of the hotels.
Subsequent to September 30, 2010, we acquired the 124-room Residence Inn by Marriott®
New Rochelle, New York and the 145-room Homewood Suites by Hilton Carlsbad, California. We expect
that a significant portion of our portfolio will consist of hotels in the upscale extended-stay or
select-service categories, including brands such as Homewood Suites by Hilton®,
Residence Inn by Marriott®, Summerfield Suites by Hyatt®, Courtyard by
Marriott®, Hampton Inn® and Hampton Inn and Suites®.
As of September 30, 2010, we have financed all 11 of our acquisitions with proceeds of our IPO
and the assumption of $12.4 million of debt on two of our hotels. We financed the acquisition of
the two hotels acquired subsequent to September 30, 2010 with the remaining proceeds from our IPO
and borrowings under our recently completed credit facility. On October 28, 2010, we filed a
Registration Statement on Form S-11 to issue additional common shares in an underwritten public
offering. Proceeds from this offering will be used to pay down our credit facility, fund future
acquisitions, capital improvements at our hotels and other general corporate purposes. We expect to
fund subsequent acquisitions from both debt and equity sources.
We intend to elect to qualify for treatment as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for
federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the Code), we cannot operate the hotels that we acquire. Therefore, our operating
partnership, Chatham Lodging, L.P. (the Operating Partnership), and its
20
Table of Contents
subsidiaries will lease our hotel properties to lessee subsidiaries (TRS Lessees) of our taxable REIT subsidiaries
(TRS), who will in turn engage eligible independent contractors to manage the hotels. Each of
these lessees will be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary for federal income tax purposes and will
be evaluated for consolidation within our financial statements for accounting purposes. However,
since we will control both the Operating Partnership and the TRS Lessees, our principal source of
funds on a consolidated basis will be from the operations of our hotels. The earnings of the TRS
Lessees will be subject to taxation as regular C corporations, as defined in the Code, reducing the
TRS Lessees ability to pay dividends, and therefore our funds from operations and the cash
available for distribution to our shareholders.
Financial Condition and Operating Performance Metrics
We measure financial condition and hotel operating performance by evaluating financial metrics
such as:
| Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR), | ||
| Average Daily Rate (ADR), | ||
| Occupancy percentage, | ||
| Funds From Operations (FFO), | ||
| Adjusted FFO, | ||
| Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), and | ||
| Adjusted EBITDA. |
We evaluate the hotels in our portfolio and potential acquisitions using these metrics to
determine each hotels contribution towards providing income to our shareholders through increases
in distributable cash flow and increasing long-term total returns through appreciation in the value
of our common shares. RevPAR, ADR and Occupancy are hotel industry measures commonly used to
evaluate operating performance. RevPAR, which is calculated as total room revenue divided by total
number of available rooms, is an important metric for monitoring hotel operating performance.
Please refer to Non-GAAP Financial Measures for a detailed discussion of our use of FFO,
Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA to net income or loss, a GAAP measurement.
Results of Operations
Industry outlook
Operating performance for the U.S. lodging industry declined 16.7% in 2009, as reported by
Smith Travel Research, due to the challenging economic conditions created by declining GDP, high
levels of unemployment, low consumer confidence, the significant decline in home prices and a
reduction in available credit. We believe that the hotel industrys performance is correlated to
the performance of the economy and with key economic indicators such as GDP growth, employment
trends, corporate profits and consumer confidence improving, we expect a rebound in the performance
of the hotel industry. After 19 consecutive months of declining year over year RevPAR, monthly
RevPAR has been higher year over year since March, as reported by Smith Travel Research.
While the U.S. hotel industry has shown improvement since the time of our IPO and we are
encouraged by these improvements, industry operating performance remains significantly below
pre-2008 levels. In addition to facing weakened operating performance, hotel owners have been
adversely impacted by a significant decline in the availability of debt financing. We believe that
the combination of a decline in operating performance and reduction in the availability of debt
financing has caused hotel values to decline in recent years and will continue to lead to increased
hotel loan foreclosures and distressed hotel property sales. In addition, we believe that the
supply of new hotels is likely to remain low for the next several years due to limited availability
of debt financing. Hotel industry operating performance historically has correlated with U.S. GDP
growth, and a number of economists and government agencies currently predict that the U.S. economy
will grow over the next several years. We believe that U.S. GDP growth, coupled with limited supply
of new hotels, will lead to increases in lodging industry RevPAR and hotel operating profits.
21
Table of Contents
Three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010
Prior to April 21, 2010, operations had not commenced because we were in our developmental
stage. For the third quarter and year to date of 2010, the Company had a net loss of $0.3 million,
or a loss of $0.03 per diluted share and $0.9 million, or a loss of $0.17 per diluted share,
respectively. For the quarter, FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA were $0.5 million,
$2.0 million, $0.9 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Year to date, FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA
and Adjusted EBITDA were $0.3 million, $2.7 million, $0.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively.
Results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 include the
operating activities of the 11 hotels owned at September 30, 2010 since their acquisition.
Revenues
Total revenue was $8.4 million and $13.0 million for the quarter and year to date,
respectively. Since all of our hotels are select service or limited service hotels, room revenue is
the primary revenue source as these hotels do not have a meaningful food and beverage source or
large group conference facilities. As such, room revenue was $8.1 million and $12.7 million for the
quarter and year to date, respectively, which revenue comprised 97% of total revenue for the
quarter and year to date. Other operating revenue, comprised of meeting room, gift shop, in-room
movie and other ancillary amenities revenue, was $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the quarter and
year to date, respectively.
Since room revenue is the primary component of total revenue, the Companys revenue results
are dependent on maintaining and improving occupancy, ADR and RevPAR at our hotels. Occupancy, ADR,
and RevPAR results are presented in the following table based on the period since our acquisition
of the hotels:
Quarter ended | Year to date | |||||||
September 30, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||
Portfolio |
||||||||
ADR |
$ | 107.93 | $ | 106.32 | ||||
Occupancy |
74.3 | % | 75.7 | % | ||||
RevPar |
$ | 80.21 | $ | 80.49 |
Hotel Operating Expenses
Hotel operating expenses were $4.9 million and $7.6 million for the quarter and year to date,
respectively. As a percentage of total revenue, hotel operating expenses were 59% and 58% for the
quarter and year to date, respectively. Direct hotel operating expenses included rooms expense of
$1.9 million and $3.0 million for the quarter and year to date, respectively. Other direct
expenses, which include management and franchise fees, insurance, utilities, repairs and
maintenance, advertising and sales, and general and administrative expenses, were $3.0 million and
$4.6 million for the quarter and year to date, respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense was $0.8 million and $1.2 million for the quarter and
year to date, respectively. Depreciation is recorded on our hotel buildings over 40 years from the
date of acquisition. Depreciable lives of hotel furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally
three to ten years between the date of acquisition and the date that the furniture, fixtures and
equipment will be replaced. Amortization of franchise fees is recorded over the term of the
respective franchise agreement.
Real Estate and Personal Property Taxes
Total real estate and personal property taxes expenses were $0.5 million and $0.7 million for
the quarter and year to
date, respectively.
Corporate General and Administrative
Corporate general and administrative expenses principally consist of employee-related costs,
including base payroll
22
Table of Contents
and amortization of restricted stock and LTIP awards. These expenses also
include corporate operating costs, professional fees and trustees fees. Total corporate general
and administrative expenses were $1.4 million and $2.3 million for the quarter and year to date,
respectively. Payroll related costs were $0.4 million and $0.6 million and share based compensation
was $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the quarter and year to date, respectively. During the
quarter, payroll costs included expenses of $0.2 million and share-based compensation included an
expense of $0.1 million related to the departure of the former CFO. Organization costs of $0 and
$0.1 million are included in corporate general and administrative expenses for the quarter and year
to date, respectively, and we do not expect these costs to recur as the costs were related to our
start-up as an organization.
Hotel Property Acquisition Costs
We incurred hotel property acquisition costs of $1.2 million and $2.2 million for the quarter
and year to date, respectively. These expenses represent costs associated with the purchase of the
eleven hotels owned at September 30, 2010, costs associated with the purchase of two hotels
acquired subsequent to the end of the quarter as well as costs for potential hotel acquisitions.
These acquisition-related costs are expensed when incurred rather than capitalized. Including the
acquisitions completed subsequent to the end of the quarter, year to date acquisition costs were
approximately 1% of total assets.
Interest Income
Interest income on cash and cash equivalents was $0.1 million for the quarter and year to
date, respectively.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $19 thousand for the quarter and year to date, respectively. In
connection with the acquisition of two hotels during the quarter, we assumed two loans with a
principal balance of approximately $12.4 million. The average interest rate of the two fixed rate
loans is 5.9%.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $0 and $46 thousand for the quarter and year to date, respectively. Our
TRSs are subject to income taxes and this expense is based on the taxable income of the TRS for
the periods at a tax rate of approximately 40%.
Material Trends or Uncertainties
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, favorable or unfavorable, that may
be reasonably anticipated to have a material impact on either the capital resources or the revenues
or income to be derived from the acquisition and operation of properties, loans and other permitted
investments, other than those referred to in the risk factors identified in the Risk Factors
section of our Registration Statement on Form S-11, as filed with the SEC.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We consider the following non-GAAP financial measures useful to investors as key supplemental
measures of our performance: (1) FFO, (2) Adjusted FFO, (3) EBITDA, and (4) Adjusted EBITDA. These
non-GAAP financial measures could be considered along with, but not as alternatives to, net income
or loss as a measure of our operating performance.
FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent cash generated from operating
activities as determined by GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or
loss, cash flows from operations or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP.
FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of our liquidity, nor are FFO,
Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs,
including our ability to make cash distributions. These measurements do not reflect cash
expenditures for
long-term assets and other items that have been and will be incurred. FFO, Adjusted FFO,
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may include funds that may not be available for managements
discretionary use due to functional requirements to conserve funds for capital expenditures,
property acquisitions, and other commitments and uncertainties.
We calculate FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real
Estate Investment
23
Table of Contents
Trusts (NAREIT), which defines FFO as net income or loss (calculated in accordance with GAAP),
excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate, items classified by GAAP as extraordinary, the
cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, plus depreciation and amortization, and
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Historical cost accounting for real
estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over
time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions,
many real estate industry investors consider FFO to be helpful in evaluating a real estate
companys operations. We believe that by excluding the effect of depreciation and amortization,
gains or losses from sales for real estate, extraordinary items and the portion of items related to
unconsolidated entities, all of which are based on historical cost accounting, and which may be of
lesser significance in evaluating current performance, that FFO can facilitate comparisons of
operating performance between periods and between REITs.
We further adjust FFO for certain additional recurring and non-recurring items that are not in
NAREITs definition of FFO such as hotel property acquisition costs and costs associated with the
departure of our former CFO which are referred to as other charges below. We believe that
Adjusted FFO provides investors with another financial measure that may facilitate comparisons of
operating performance between periods and between REITs.
We calculate EBITDA as net income or loss excluding: (1) interest expense; (2) provision for
income taxes, including income taxes applicable to sale of assets; and (3) depreciation and
amortization. We consider EBITDA useful to an investor in evaluating and facilitating comparisons
of our operating performance between periods and between REITs by removing the impact of our
capital structure and asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) from our operating
results. In addition, EBITDA is used as one measure in determining the value of hotel acquisitions
and dispositions.
We further adjust EBITDA for certain additional recurring and non-recurring items such as
hotel property acquisition costs and costs associated with the departure of our former CFO which
are referred to as other charges below. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides investors with
another financial measure that can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods
and between REITs.
The following is a reconciliation between net loss to FFO and Adjusted FFO for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 (in thousands, except share data):
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Funds From Operations (FFO): |
||||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (288 | ) | $ | (930 | ) | ||
Depreciation |
798 | 1,200 | ||||||
FFO |
510 | 270 | ||||||
Hotel property acquisition costs |
1,161 | 2,165 | ||||||
Other charges included in general and administrative expenses |
270 | 270 | ||||||
Adjusted FFO |
$ | 1,941 | $ | 2,705 | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares |
||||||||
Basic |
9,125,000 | 5,448,663 | ||||||
Diluted |
9,125,000 | 5,448,663 |
24
Table of Contents
The following is a reconciliation between net loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA): |
||||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (288 | ) | $ | (930 | ) | ||
Interest expense |
19 | 19 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
| 46 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
798 | 1,200 | ||||||
Share based compensation |
406 | 630 | ||||||
EBITDA |
935 | 965 | ||||||
Hotel property acquisition costs |
1,161 | 2,165 | ||||||
Other charges included in general and administrative expenses |
183 | 183 | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 2,279 | $ | 3,313 | ||||
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our principal sources of cash include net cash from operations and proceeds from debt and
equity issuances. Our principal uses of cash include acquisitions, capital expenditures, operating
costs, corporate expenditures, debt repayments and distributions to equity holders.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net cash flows provided by operations were $1.7
million driven by EBITDA of $1.0 million as well as the timing of cash receipts and payments from
our hotels. Net cash flows used in investing activities were $148.6 million, which represents the
acquisition of the eleven hotels as well as additional improvements in those hotels of $0.9 million
and $5.7 million of funds placed into escrows for future acquisitions and lender or manager
required escrows. Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $173.7 million, comprised
primarily from proceeds generated from the IPO and our concurrent private placement of common
shares to our Chief Executive Officer, net of underwriting fees and offering costs paid or payable
to third parties of $173.9 million.
As of September 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $26.8 million.
Subsequent to September 30, 2010, we used $19.0 million of cash and cash equivalents and $2.0
million of restricted cash on the acquisition of the Residence Inn New Rochelle, New York and paid
$5.2 million of deferred underwriting fees once we had invested 85% of the IPO proceeds in hotel
properties. Payment of the deferred underwriting fees was made on October 21, 2010. On October
29, 2010, we paid $1.7 million in third quarter dividends on our common shares and distributions on
our LTIP units.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We intend to limit the outstanding principal amount of our consolidated indebtedness to not
more than 35% of the investment in our hotel properties at cost (defined as our initial acquisition
price plus the gross amount of any subsequent capital investment and excluding any impairment
charges), measured at the time the debt is incurred, and a subsequent decrease in hotel property
values will not necessarily cause us to repay debt to comply with this limitation. Our board of
trustees may modify or eliminate this policy at any time without the approval of our shareholders.
Following completion of the hotel acquisitions described in Note 13 to our financial statements, we
have fully invested the net proceeds of our IPO and the concurrent private placement of common
shares to our Chief Executive Officer in hotel properties.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by
operations, existing cash balances and, if necessary, short-term borrowings under our revolving
credit facility (see Note 13 to our financial statements). We believe that our net cash provided
by operations will be adequate to fund operating requirements, pay interest on any borrowings and
fund dividends in accordance with the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the U.S.
Federal Tax Code. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements whether in relation to
investments in hotel properties or scheduled debt maturities through the net proceeds from
additional issuances of common and preferred shares, issuances of units of limited partnership
interest in the Operating Partnership or long-term secured and unsecured borrowings. The success of
our acquisition strategy may depend, in part, on our ability to access additional capital through
issuances of equity or debt securities.
On October 12, 2010, the REIT, as parent guarantor and the Operating Partnership, as borrower
(the Borrower), entered into a $85.0 million, three-year, secured revolving credit agreement (the
Credit Agreement) with the lenders party
25
Table of Contents
thereto, Barclays Capital and Regions Capital Markets as
joint lead arrangers, Barclays Bank PLC as administrative agent, Regions Bank as syndication agent,
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, UBS Securities and US Bank National Association
acting as co-documentation agents.
Subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement, the Borrower may
increase the original principal amount of the Credit Agreement by an additional $25.0 million.
Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Company and certain indirect subsidiaries of the Company
guarantee to the Lenders all of the obligations of the Borrower under the Credit Agreement, any
notes and the other loan documents, including any obligations under hedging arrangements. From time
to time, the Borrower may be required to cause additional subsidiaries to become guarantors under
the Credit
Agreement.
Availability under the Credit Agreement is based on the least of the following: (i) the
aggregate commitments of all Lenders, (ii) a percentage of the as-is appraised value of
qualifying borrowing base properties (subject to certain concentration limitations and other
deductions) and (iii) a percentage of net operating income from qualifying borrowing base
properties (subject to certain limitations and other deductions). The Credit Agreement is secured
by each borrowing base property, including all personal property assets related thereto, and the
equity interests of borrowing base entities and certain other subsidiaries of the Company. There
are currently seven properties in the borrowing base under the Credit Agreement.
The Credit Agreement provides for revolving credit loans to the Company. All borrowings under
the Credit Agreement will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at the option of the Company,
(i) the greater of (A) 1.25% plus a margin that fluctuates based upon the Companys leverage ratio
or (B) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus a margin that fluctuates based
upon the Companys leverage ratio; or (ii) the greatest of (A) 2.25%, (B) the prime lending rate as
set forth on the Reuters Screen RTRTSY1 (or such other comparable publicly available rate if such
rate no longer appears on the Reuters Screen RTRTSY1), (C) the weighted average of the rates on
overnight federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by federal
funds brokers, plus 1/2 of 1%, or (D) 1% plus the Eurodollar Rate (as
defined in the Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement also permits the issuance of letters of
credit and provides for swing line loans.
The Credit Agreement contains representations, warranties, covenants, terms and conditions
customary for transactions of this type, including a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio and minimum net worth financial covenants, limitations on (i) liens, (ii) incurrence
of debt, (iii) investments, (iv) distributions, and (v) mergers and asset dispositions, covenants
to preserve corporate existence and comply with laws, covenants on the use of proceeds of the
credit facility and default provisions, including defaults for non-payment, breach of
representations and warranties, insolvency, non-performance of covenants, cross-defaults and
guarantor defaults. The occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Agreement could result
in all loans and other obligations becoming immediately due and payable and the credit facility
being terminated and allow the Lenders to exercise all rights and remedies available to them with
respect to the collateral.
Debt
During the third quarter, we assumed $12.4 million of fixed rate mortgage loans in connection
with two hotel acquisitions. The carrying value of the mortgage debt was approximately equal to the
fair value of the debt on the date of assumption. The weighted average interest rate of the two
loans is approximately 5.9%.
Financial Covenants
The two mortgage loans we assumed contain financial covenants concerning the maintenance of a
minimum debt service coverage ratio. The loan encumbering the Altoona hotel requires a minimum
ratio of 1.5x and our ratio is 1.8x. The loan encumbering the Washington hotel requires a minimum
ratio of 1.65x and our ratio is 2.6x. We are in compliance with these covenants at September 30,
2010.
Dividend Policy
We are required to distribute at least 90% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital
gains, to our stockholders in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, including taxable
income recognized for federal income tax
26
Table of Contents
purposes but with regard to which we do not receive cash.
Funds used by us to pay dividends on our common shares are provided through distributions from the
Operating Partnership.
Our current policy on common dividends is generally to distribute, over time, 100% of our
annual taxable income. The amount of any dividends will be determined by our Board of Trustees. On
September 27, 2010, our Board of Trustees declared a dividend of $0.175 per common share and LTIP
unit. The dividends to our common shareholders and the distributions to our LTIP unit holders were
paid on October 29, 2010 to holders of record as of October 15, 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2010.
Contractual Obligations
On October 12, 2010, the REIT, as parent guarantor and the Operating Partnership, as borrower
(the Borrower), entered into a $85.0 million, three-year, secured revolving credit agreement (the
Credit Agreement) with the lenders party thereto, Barclays Capital and Regions Capital Markets as
joint lead arrangers, Barclays Bank PLC as administrative agent, Regions Bank as syndication agent,
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, UBS Securities and US Bank National Association
acting as co-documentation agents.
On October 5, 2010, the Company acquired the 124-room Residence Inn by Marriott® -
New Rochelle in New Rochelle, New York for $21 million, plus customary pro-rated amounts and
closing costs, from New Roc Hotels, LLC. The hotel will be managed by IHM pursuant to a 5-year
management agreement. On November 3, 2010, the Company acquired the 145-room Homewood Suites by
Hilton Carlsbad in Carlsbad, California for $32 million, plus customary pro-rated amounts and
closing costs, from Royal Hospitality Washington, LLC and Lee Estates, LLC. The hotel will be
managed by IHM pursuant to a 5-year management agreement.
Critical Accounting Policies
We consider the following policies critical because they require estimates about matters that
are inherently uncertain, involve various assumptions and require management judgment. The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the
balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.
Investment in Hotel Properties
The Company allocates the purchase prices of hotel properties acquired based on the fair value
of the acquired real estate, furniture, fixtures and equipment, identifiable intangible assets and
assumed liabilities. In making estimates of fair value for purposes of allocating the purchase
price, the Company utilizes a number of sources of information that are obtained in connection with
the acquisition of a hotel property, including valuations performed by independent third parties
and information obtained about each hotel property resulting from pre-acquisition due diligence.
Hotel property acquisition costs, such as transfer taxes, title insurance, environmental and
property condition reviews, and legal and accounting fees, are expensed in the period incurred.
The Companys investment in hotel properties are carried at cost and are depreciated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 40 years for
buildings, 15 years for building improvements, seven years for land improvements and three to ten
years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Renovations and/or replacements at the hotel
properties that improve or extend the life of the assets are capitalized and depreciated over their
useful lives, while repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Upon the sale or retirement
of property and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the
Companys accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of
operations.
The Company will periodically review its hotel properties for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the hotel properties may not be
recoverable. Events or circumstances that may cause a review include, but are not limited to,
adverse changes in the demand for lodging at the properties due to
27
Table of Contents
declining national or local
economic conditions and/or new hotel construction in markets where the hotels are located. When
such conditions exist, management will perform an analysis to determine if the estimated
undiscounted future cash flows, without interest charges, from operations and the proceeds from the
ultimate disposition of a hotel property exceed its carrying value. If the estimated undiscounted
future cash flows are less than the carrying amount, an adjustment to reduce the carrying amount to
the related hotel propertys estimated fair market value is recorded and an impairment loss
recognized. We do not believe that there are any facts or circumstances indicating impairment in
the carrying value of any of our hotel properties.
The Company will consider a hotel property as held for sale when a binding agreement to
purchase the property has been signed under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of
nonrefundable cash, no significant financing
contingencies exist which could cause the transaction not to be completed in a timely manner
and the sale is expected to occur within one year. If these criteria are met, depreciation and
amortization of the hotel property will cease and an impairment loss if any will be recognized if
the fair value of the hotel property, less the costs to sell, is lower than the carrying amount of
the hotel property. The Company will classify the loss, together with the related operating
results, as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and classify the
assets and related liabilities as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets. As of September
30, 2010, the Company had no hotel properties held for sale.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from hotel operations are recognized when rooms are occupied and when services are
provided. Revenues consist of amounts derived from hotel operations, including sales from room,
meeting room, gift shop, in-room movie and other ancillary amenities. Sales, use, occupancy, and
similar taxes are collected and presented on a net basis (excluded from revenues) in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company measures compensation expense for the restricted share awards based upon the fair
market value of our common shares at the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period and is included in general and administrative expense
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company will pay dividends on
nonvested restricted shares.
28
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
We may be exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our assumption of
long-term debt in connection with our acquisitions. Our interest rate risk management objectives
are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall
borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we will borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable
rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable
rates to fixed rates. With respect to variable rate financing, we will assess interest rate risk
by identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected
future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.
At September 30, 2010, our consolidated debt was comprised only of fixed interest rate loans.
The fair value of our fixed rate debt indicates the estimated principal amount of debt having the
same debt service requirements that could have been borrowed at the date presented, at then current
market interest rates. The following table provides information about our financial instruments
that are sensitive to changes in interest rates (in thousands):
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed-rate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt |
$ | 80 | $ | 334 | $ | 354 | $ | 375 | $ | 398 | $ | 10,894 | $ | 12,435 | $ | 12,346 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
5.90 | % | 5.90 | % | 5.90 | % | 5.90 | % | 5.90 | % | 5.91 | % | 5.91 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
29
Table of Contents
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the
effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as
of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and
procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during
our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
The nature of the operations of the hotels exposes the hotels, the Company and the Operating
Partnership to the risk of claims and litigation in the normal course of their business. The
Company is not presently subject to any litigation nor, to the Companys knowledge, is any
litigation threatened against the Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Risk Factors
section of Amendment No. 7 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the SEC
on April 5, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
In connection with its formation and initial capitalization, on October 30, 2009, the Company
issued 1,000 of its common shares to Jeffrey H. Fisher, the Companys Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, for $10.00 per share. These shares were repurchased by the Company in connection
with completion of the IPO.
Concurrently with the closing of the IPO on April 21, 2010, in a separate private placement
pursuant to Regulation D under the Securities Act, the Company sold 500,000 of its common shares to
Jeffrey H. Fisher at the public offering price of $20.00 per share.
Use of Proceeds
Our registration statement on Form S-11, as amended (Registration No. 333-162889) (the
Registration Statement), with respect to the IPO, registered up to $172.5 million of our common
shares, par value $0.01 per share, and was declared effective on April 15, 2010. We sold a total
of 8,625,000 common shares in the IPO, including 1,125,000 common shares issued and sold pursuant
to the underwriters exercise of the overallotment option for gross proceeds of $172.5 million.
The IPO was completed on April 21, 2010. As of the date of filing of this report, the IPO has
terminated and all of the securities registered pursuant to the Registration Statement have been
sold. The joint book-running managers of the IPO were Barclays Capital Inc. and FBR Capital
Markets & Co. Co-managers of the IPO were Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc., Stifel, Nicolaus &
Company, Incorporated, Credit Agricole Securities (USA) Inc. and JMP Securities LLC. The expenses
of the IPO were as follows (in millions):
Underwriting discounts and commissions |
$ | 12.1 | ||
Expenses paid to or for our underwriters |
0.0 | |||
Other expenses |
1.7 | |||
Total underwriting discounts and expenses |
$ | 13.8 | ||
30
Table of Contents
All of the foregoing underwriting discounts and expenses were direct or indirect payments to
persons other than: (i) our trustees, officers or any of their associates; (ii) persons owning ten
percent (10%) or more of our common shares; or (iii) our affiliates.
The net proceeds to us of the IPO were approximately $158.7 million, after payment in full of
fees to the underwriters and offering expenses. In accordance with the underwriting agreement,
$5.2 million of the underwriting discount and commissions were accrued and scheduled to be paid
when we purchase hotel properties in accordance with our investment strategy in an amount equal to
at least 85% of the amount of the net proceeds. Payment was made on October 21, 2010. Until that
time, the net proceeds including the unpaid underwriting discount and commission were invested in
short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade securities, and money market accounts that are
consistent with our intention to qualify as a REIT.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
Item 5. Other information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
Exhibit Number | Description of Exhibit | |||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
31
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST |
||||
Dated: November 9, 2010 | /s/ DENNIS M. CRAVEN | |||
Dennis M. Craven | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
32
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit Number | Description of Exhibit | |||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
33