Chatham Lodging Trust - Quarter Report: 2014 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-34693
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland | 27-1200777 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
50 Cocoanut Row, Suite 211 | ||
Palm Beach, Florida | 33480 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(561) 802-4477
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at May 8, 2014 |
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest ($0.01 par value per share) | 26,390,788 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||
Item 1. | ||
Item 2. | ||
Item 3. | ||
Item 4. | ||
Item 1. | ||
Item 1A. | ||
Item 2. | ||
Item 3. | ||
Item 4. | ||
Item 5. | ||
Item 6. |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
March 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||
Assets: | |||||||
Investment in hotel properties, net | $ | 650,428 | $ | 652,877 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | 5,821 | 4,221 | |||||
Restricted cash | 5,286 | 4,605 | |||||
Investment in unconsolidated real estate entities | 764 | 774 | |||||
Hotel receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $53 and $30, respectively) | 2,205 | 2,455 | |||||
Deferred costs, net | 6,763 | 7,113 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 3,091 | 1,879 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 674,358 | $ | 673,924 | |||
Liabilities and Equity: | |||||||
Mortgage debt | $ | 223,158 | $ | 222,063 | |||
Revolving credit facility | 55,000 | 50,000 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 12,944 | 12,799 | |||||
Distributions and losses in excess of investments of unconsolidated real estate entities | 2,331 | 1,576 | |||||
Distributions payable | 1,934 | 1,950 | |||||
Total liabilities | 295,367 | 288,388 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||
Equity: | |||||||
Shareholders’ Equity: | |||||||
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized and unissued at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 | — | — | |||||
Common shares, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 26,390,788 and 26,295,558 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | 261 | 261 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 434,505 | 433,900 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (58,084 | ) | (50,792 | ) | |||
Total shareholders’ equity | 376,682 | 383,369 | |||||
Noncontrolling Interests: | |||||||
Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership | 2,309 | 2,167 | |||||
Total equity | 378,991 | 385,536 | |||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 674,358 | $ | 673,924 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
For the three months ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Revenue: | |||||||
Room | $ | 33,958 | $ | 24,235 | |||
Food and beverage | 628 | 150 | |||||
Other | 1,608 | 1,011 | |||||
Cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities | 672 | 383 | |||||
Total revenue | 36,866 | 25,779 | |||||
Expenses: | |||||||
Hotel operating expenses: | |||||||
Room | 7,755 | 5,551 | |||||
Food and beverage expense | 466 | 134 | |||||
Telephone expense | 287 | 191 | |||||
Other hotel operating expense | 443 | 348 | |||||
General and administrative | 3,426 | 2,578 | |||||
Franchise and marketing fees | 2,793 | 1,901 | |||||
Advertising and promotions | 831 | 657 | |||||
Utilities | 1,620 | 1,065 | |||||
Repairs and maintenance | 1,999 | 1,445 | |||||
Management fees | 1,094 | 671 | |||||
Insurance | 215 | 171 | |||||
Total hotel operating expenses | 20,929 | 14,712 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 6,316 | 3,756 | |||||
Property taxes and insurance | 2,650 | 1,987 | |||||
General and administrative | 2,321 | 1,982 | |||||
Hotel property acquisition costs and other charges | 1,482 | 177 | |||||
Reimbursed costs from unconsolidated real estate entities | 672 | 383 | |||||
Total operating expenses | 34,370 | 22,997 | |||||
Operating income | 2,496 | 2,782 | |||||
Interest and other income | 13 | 5 | |||||
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred fees | (3,738 | ) | (2,841 | ) | |||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | (184 | ) | (933 | ) | |||
Loss from unconsolidated real estate entities | (316 | ) | (631 | ) | |||
Loss before income tax expense | (1,729 | ) | (1,618 | ) | |||
Income tax expense | (3 | ) | — | ||||
Net loss | $ | (1,732 | ) | $ | (1,618 | ) | |
Loss per Common Share - Basic: | |||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders (Note 11) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | |
Loss per Common Share - Diluted: | |||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders (Note 11) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: | |||||||
Basic | 26,271,678 | 17,212,124 | |||||
Diluted | 26,271,678 | 17,212,124 | |||||
Distributions per common share: | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.21 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
Common Shares | Additional Paid - In Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Total Shareholders’ Equity | Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership | Total Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2013 | 13,908,907 | $ | 137 | $ | 240,355 | $ | (35,491 | ) | $ | 205,001 | $ | 1,611 | $ | 206,612 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of shares pursuant to Equity Incentive Plan | 22,536 | — | 337 | — | 337 | — | 337 | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares, net of offering costs of $3,040 | 3,592,677 | 37 | 49,736 | — | 49,773 | — | 49,773 | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted time-based shares | 40,829 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of performance based shares | 17,731 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares | (445 | ) | — | (7 | ) | — | (7 | ) | — | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of share based compensation | — | — | 268 | — | 268 | 195 | 463 | |||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared on common shares ($0.21 per share) | — | — | — | (3,700 | ) | (3,700 | ) | — | (3,700 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared on LTIP units ($0.21 per unit) | — | — | — | — | — | (54 | ) | (54 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | (1,618 | ) | (1,618 | ) | — | (1,618 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2013 | 17,582,235 | $ | 174 | $ | 290,689 | $ | (40,809 | ) | $ | 250,054 | $ | 1,752 | $ | 251,806 | ||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2014 | 26,295,558 | $ | 261 | $ | 433,900 | $ | (50,792 | ) | $ | 383,369 | $ | 2,167 | $ | 385,536 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of shares pursuant to Equity Incentive Plan | 16,542 | — | 337 | — | 337 | — | 337 | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted time-based shares | 48,213 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of performance based shares | 31,342 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares | (867 | ) | — | (18 | ) | — | (18 | ) | — | (18 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of share based compensation | — | — | 286 | — | 286 | 196 | 482 | |||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared on common shares ($0.21 per share) | — | — | — | (5,560 | ) | (5,560 | ) | — | (5,560 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared on LTIP units ($0.21 per unit) | — | — | — | — | — | (54 | ) | (54 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | (1,732 | ) | (1,732 | ) | — | (1,732 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2014 | 26,390,788 | $ | 261 | $ | 434,505 | $ | (58,084 | ) | $ | 376,682 | $ | 2,309 | $ | 378,991 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
For the three months ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,732 | ) | $ | (1,618 | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Depreciation | 6,288 | 3,737 | |||||
Amortization of deferred franchise fees | 28 | 19 | |||||
Amortization of deferred financing fees included in interest expense | 394 | 308 | |||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 184 | 933 | |||||
Loss on write-off of deferred franchise fee | — | 64 | |||||
Share based compensation | 585 | 548 | |||||
Loss from unconsolidated real estate entities | 316 | 631 | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||
Hotel receivables | 250 | 115 | |||||
Deferred costs | 130 | 369 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (1,223 | ) | (504 | ) | |||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (242 | ) | 94 | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 4,978 | 4,696 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||
Improvements and additions to hotel properties | (3,207 | ) | (3,078 | ) | |||
Acquisition of hotel properties, net of cash acquired | — | (34,764 | ) | ||||
Distributions from unconsolidated entities | 449 | — | |||||
Restricted cash | (681 | ) | 681 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (3,439 | ) | (37,161 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||
Borrowings on revolving credit facility | 38,000 | 66,500 | |||||
Repayments on revolving credit facility | (33,000 | ) | (49,500 | ) | |||
Payments on debt | (719 | ) | (354 | ) | |||
Proceeds from the issuance of debt | 34,000 | 72,858 | |||||
Principal prepayment of mortgage debt | (32,186 | ) | (100,130 | ) | |||
Payment of financing costs | (156 | ) | (680 | ) | |||
Payment of offering costs | (230 | ) | (3,040 | ) | |||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares | — | 52,812 | |||||
In-substance repurchase of vested common shares | (18 | ) | (7 | ) | |||
Distributions-common shares/units | (5,630 | ) | (5,345 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 61 | 33,114 | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 1,600 | 649 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 4,221 | 4,496 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 5,821 | $ | 5,145 | |||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 3,260 | $ | 2,736 | |||
Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 90 | $ | 50 |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing information:
On January 15, 2014, the Company issued 16,542 shares to its independent trustees pursuant to the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan as compensation for services performed in 2013. On January 15, 2013, the Company issued 22,536 shares to its independent trustees pursuant to the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan as compensation for services performed in 2012.
As of March 31, 2014, the Company had accrued distributions payable of $1,934. These distributions were paid on April 25, 2014 except for $70 related to accrued but unpaid distributions on unvested performance based shares (See Note 12). As of March 31, 2013, the Company had accrued distributions payable of $1,284. These distributions were paid on April 26, 2013 except for $35 related to accrued but unpaid distributions on unvested performance based shares.
Accrued share based compensation of $103 and $84 is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Accrued share based compensation of $337 and $337 was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Accrued capital improvements of $945 and $366 are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. Organization
Chatham Lodging Trust (“we,” “us” or the “Company”) was formed as a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) on October 26, 2009. The Company is internally-managed and was organized to invest primarily in premium-branded upscale extended-stay and select-service hotels.
The net proceeds from any share offerings are contributed to Chatham Lodging, L.P., our operating partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), in exchange for partnership interests. Substantially all of the Company’s assets are held by, and all operations are conducted through, the Operating Partnership. Chatham Lodging Trust is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and owns 100% of the common units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. Certain of the Company’s executive officers hold vested and unvested long-term incentive plan units in the Operating Partnership, which are presented as non-controlling interests on our consolidated balance sheets.
As of March 31, 2014, the Company owned 25 hotels with an aggregate of 3,591 rooms located in 15 states and the District of Columbia, held a 10.3% noncontrolling interest in a joint venture (the “Innkeepers JV”) with Cerberus Capital Management (“Cerberus”) which owns 51 hotels comprising an aggregate of 6,847 rooms, and held a 5.0% noncontrolling interest in a joint venture (the "Torrance JV") with Cerberus that owns the 248-room Residence Inn by Marriott in Torrance, CA.
To qualify as a REIT, the Company cannot operate the hotels. Therefore, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries lease our wholly owned hotels to taxable REIT subsidiary lessees (“TRS Lessees”), which are wholly owned by one of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) holding companies. The Company indirectly owns its interest in 51 of the Innkeepers JV hotels and its interest in the Torrance JV through the Operating Partnership. All of the Innkeepers JV hotels and the Torrance JV hotel are leased to TRS Lessees, in which the Company indirectly owns noncontrolling interests through one of its TRS holding companies. Each hotel is leased to a TRS Lessee under a percentage lease that provides for rental payments equal to the greater of (i) a fixed base rent amount or (ii) a percentage rent based on hotel room revenue. The initial term of each of the TRS leases is 5 years. Lease revenue from each TRS Lessee is eliminated in consolidation.
The TRS Lessees have entered into management agreements with third party management companies that provide day-to-day management for the hotels. As of March 31, 2014, Island Hospitality Management Inc. (“IHM”), which is 90% owned by Jeffrey H. Fisher, the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, managed 23 of the Company’s wholly owned hotels and Concord Hospitality Enterprises Company managed two of the Company’s wholly owned hotels. As of March 31, 2014, all of the Innkeepers JV hotels were managed by IHM. The Torrance JV hotel is managed by Marriott International, Inc. ("Marriott").
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) applicable to interim financial information. These unaudited consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of equity, and consolidated statements of cash flows for the periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of full year performance due to seasonal and other factors including the timing of the acquisition of hotels.
The consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, and the related notes thereto as of December 31, 2013, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
7
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to be comparable to the current period presentation. The reclassification did not have any impact on the previously reported loss or equity.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
3. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In April 2014, the FASB issued amendments to guidance for reporting discontinued operations and disposals of components of an entity. The amended guidance requires that a disposal representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results or a business activity classified as held for sale upon acquisition should be reported as discontinued operations. The amendments also expand the disclosure requirements for discontinued operations and adds new disclosures for individually significant dispositions that do not qualify as discontinued operations. The amendments are effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014 (early adoption is permitted only for disposals that have not been previously reported). The implementation of the amended guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations but could have an impact on our financial statement presentation and required disclosures. Early adoption is permitted for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. We adopted this accounting standard update effective January 1, 2014.
4. Acquisition of Hotel Properties
Hotel Purchase Price Allocation
No acquisitions were completed in the three months ended March 31, 2014. The Company incurred acquisition costs of $0.3 million during three months ended March 31, 2014 and $0.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Pro Forma Financial Information
The following condensed pro forma financial information presents the unaudited results of operations as if the hotels acquired in 2013 had taken place on January 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what actual results of operations would have been had the acquisitions taken place on January 1, 2013, nor do they purport to represent the results of operations for future periods (in thousands, except share and per share data).
For the three months ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Pro forma total revenue | $ | 36,866 | $ | 34,014 | |||
Pro forma net loss | $ | (1,732 | ) | $ | (1,074 | ) | |
Pro forma income per share: | |||||||
Basic | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | |
Diluted | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | |
Weighted average Common Shares Outstanding | |||||||
Basic | 26,390,788 | 26,390,788 | |||||
Diluted | 26,390,788 | 26,390,788 |
8
5. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts at a level believed to be adequate to absorb estimated probable losses. That estimate is based on past loss experience, current economic and market conditions and other relevant factors. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $53 thousand and $30 thousand as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
6. Investment in Hotel Properties
Investment in hotel properties as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||
Land and improvements | $ | 94,847 | $ | 94,847 | |||
Building and improvements | 560,424 | 559,713 | |||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 37,051 | 36,628 | |||||
Renovations in progress | 6,701 | 4,006 | |||||
699,023 | 695,194 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (48,595 | ) | (42,317 | ) | |||
Investment in hotel properties, net | $ | 650,428 | $ | 652,877 |
7. Investment in Unconsolidated Entities
On April 17, 2013, the Company acquired a 5.0% interest for $1.7 million in the Torrance JV. The Torrance JV acquired the 248-room Residence Inn by Marriott in Torrance, CA for $31.0 million. The Company accounts for this investment under the equity method. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company received cash distributions from the Torrance JV as follows (in thousands):
For the three months ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Cash generated from other activities and excess cash | $ | 38 | $ | — | |||
Total | $ | 38 | $ | — |
The Company owns a 10.3% interest in the Innkeepers JV. The Company accounts for this investment under the equity method. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company received cash distributions from the Innkeepers JV as follows (in thousands):
For the three months ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Cash generated from other activities and excess cash | $ | 411 | $ | — | |||
Total | $ | 411 | $ | — |
The Company’s ownership interests in the Innkeepers JV and the Torrance JV (the "JV's) are subject to change in the event that either the Company or Cerberus calls for additional capital contributions to the JV's necessary for the conduct of business, including contributions to fund costs and expenses related to capital expenditures. The Company manages each JV and will receive a promote interest in each applicable JV if it meets certain return thresholds. Cerberus may also approve certain actions by each JV without the Company’s consent, including certain property dispositions conducted at arm’s length, certain actions related to the restructuring of each JV and removal of the Company as managing member in the event the Company fails to fulfill its material obligations under the applicable joint venture agreement.
9
The Innkeepers JV incurred $11.6 million and $12.1 million in depreciation expense during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Torrance JV incurred $0.2 million and $0.0 million in depreciation expense during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Innkeepers JV investment is a liability of $(2.3) million at March 31, 2014 representing that distributions and losses exceed the initial investment. The Company's investment in the Torrance JV is $0.8 million at March 31, 2014. The following table sets forth the combined components of net loss, including the Company’s share, related to the Innkeepers JV for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
For the three months ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Revenue | $ | 63,714 | $ | 61,292 | |||
Total hotel operating expenses | 36,998 | 36,830 | |||||
Operating income | $ | 26,716 | $ | 24,462 | |||
Net loss from continuing operations | $ | (3,335 | ) | $ | (5,995 | ) | |
Net loss | $ | (3,339 | ) | $ | (6,136 | ) | |
Total loss from unconsolidated real estate entities attributable to Chatham | $ | (343 | ) | $ | (631 | ) |
8. Debt
The Company’s mortgage loans and its senior secured revolving credit facility are collateralized by first-mortgage liens on certain of the Company’s properties. The mortgages are non-recourse except for instances of fraud or misapplication of funds. Mortgage debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
Collateral | Interest Rate | Maturity Date | 3/31/14 Property Carrying Value | Balance Outstanding on Loan as of | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility (1) | 2.66 | % | November 5, 2016 | $ | 234,233 | $ | 55,000 | $ | 50,000 | |||||||
Courtyard by Marriott Altoona, PA | 5.96 | % | April 1, 2016 | 10,741 | 6,327 | 6,378 | ||||||||||
SpringHill Suites by Marriott Washington, PA | 5.84 | % | April 1, 2015 | 11,837 | 4,893 | 4,937 | ||||||||||
Residence Inn by Marriott New Rochelle, NY | 5.75 | % | September 1, 2021 | 21,441 | 15,070 | 15,150 | ||||||||||
Residence Inn by Marriott Garden Grove, CA (2) | 4.79 | % | April 6, 2024 | 44,085 | 34,000 | 32,253 | ||||||||||
Residence Inn by Marriott San Diego, CA | 4.66 | % | February 6, 2023 | 47,986 | 30,422 | 30,546 | ||||||||||
Homewood Suites by Hilton San Antonio, TX | 4.59 | % | February 6, 2023 | 30,079 | 17,382 | 17,454 | ||||||||||
Residence Inn by Marriott Vienna, VA | 4.49 | % | February 6, 2023 | 33,631 | 23,825 | 23,925 | ||||||||||
Courtyard by Marriott Houston, TX | 4.19 | % | May 6, 2023 | 33,337 | 19,726 | 19,812 | ||||||||||
Hyatt Place Pittsburgh, PA | 4.65 | % | July 6, 2023 | 39,111 | 23,933 | 24,028 | ||||||||||
Residence Inn by Marriott Bellevue, WA | 4.97 | % | December 6, 2023 | $ | 70,743 | 47,580 | 47,580 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 577,224 | $ | 278,158 | $ | 272,063 |
(1) | Thirteen properties in the borrowing base serve as collateral for borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility at March 31, 2014. Interest rate is variable and based on LIBOR plus 2.5%. |
(2) | On March 21, 2014, the Company refinanced the mortgage for the Residence Inn Garden Grove hotel. The new loan has a 10-year term and a 30-year amortization payment schedule. |
10
The Company entered into an amendment (the "Amendment") to its amended and restated senior secured revolving credit facility on December 11, 2013. The amendment extends the maturity date to November 5, 2016 and includes an option to extend the maturity date by an additional year. The senior secured revolving credit facility also includes limitations on the extent of allowable distributions to the Company not to exceed the greater of 95% of Adjusted Funds from Operations (as defined i the senior secured revolving credit facility) and the minimum amount of distributions required for the Company to maintain its REIT status. Other key terms are as follows:
Facility amount | $175 million | |
Accordion feature | Increase additional $50 million | |
LIBOR floor | None | |
Interest rate applicable margin | 200-300 basis points, based on leverage ratio | |
Unused fee | 25 basis points if less than 50% unused, 35 basis points if more than 50% unused | |
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio | 1.5x |
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had $55.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively, of outstanding borrowings under its senior secured revolving credit facility. At March 31, 2014, the maximum borrowing availability under the senior secured revolving credit facility was $175.0 million.
The Company estimates the fair value of its fixed rate debt, which is all of the Company's mortgage loans, by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates. Rates take into consideration general market conditions, quality and estimated value of collateral and maturity of debt with similar credit terms and are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 3 typically consists of mortgages because of the significance of the collateral value to the value of the loan. The estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $222.9 million and $220.0 million, respectively.
The Company estimates the fair value of its variable rate debt by taking into account general market conditions and the estimated credit terms it could obtain for debt with similar maturity and is classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s only variable rate debt is under its senior secured revolving credit facility. The estimated fair value of the Company’s variable rate debt as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $55.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively.
As of March 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants. At March 31, 2014, the Company’s consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio was 2.82. Future scheduled principal payments of debt obligations as of March 31, 2014, for each of the next five calendar years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
Amount | |||
2014 (remaining nine months) | $ | 1,910 | |
2015 | 8,315 | ||
2016 | 64,533 | ||
2017 | 3,832 | ||
2018 | 3,948 | ||
Thereafter | 195,620 | ||
Total | $ | 278,158 |
11
9. Income Taxes
The Company’s TRSs are subject to federal and state income taxes. The Company’s TRSs are structured under two TRS holding companies, which are referred to as TRS 1 and TRS 2, that are treated separately for income tax purposes.
The components of income tax expense for the following periods are as follows (in thousands):
For the three months ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Federal | $ | 2 | $ | — | |||
State | 1 | — | |||||
Tax expense | $ | 3 | $ | — |
At March 31, 2014, TRS 1 had a gross deferred tax asset associated with future tax deductions of $2.0 million. TRS 1 has continued to record a full valuation allowance equal to 100% of the gross deferred tax asset due to the uncertainty of realizing the benefit of its deferred assets due to the cumulative taxable losses incurred by TRS 1 since its inception. TRS 2 has a gross deferred tax asset of $0.0 million as of March 31, 2014 and no valuation allowance has been recorded in connection with the gross deferred tax assets of TRS 2 for March 31, 2014.
10. Dividends Declared and Paid
The Company declared total common share dividends of $0.21 per share and distributions on long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) units of $0.21 per unit for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The dividends and distributions were as follows:
Record Date | Payment Date | Common share distribution amount | LTIP unit distribution amount | |||||||||
January | 1/31/2014 | 2/28/2014 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||
February | 2/28/2014 | 3/28/2014 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||||||||
March | 3/31/2014 | 4/25/2014 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||||||||
1st Quarter 2014 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.21 |
12
11. Earnings Per Share
The two class method is used to determine earnings per share because unvested restricted shares and unvested long-term incentive plan units are considered to be participating shares. Unvested restricted shares and unvested long-term incentive plan units that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future would not be included in the computation of diluted loss per share, for the periods where a loss has been recorded, because they would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented. The following is a reconciliation of the amounts used in calculating basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except share and per share data):
For the three months ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Numerator: | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,732 | ) | $ | (1,618 | ) | |
Dividends paid on unvested shares and units | (76 | ) | (78 | ) | |||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders | $ | (1,808 | ) | $ | (1,696 | ) | |
Denominator: | |||||||
Weighted average number of common shares - basic | 26,271,678 | 17,212,124 | |||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | |||||||
Unvested shares (1) | — | — | |||||
Weighted average number of common shares - diluted | 26,271,678 | 17,212,124 | |||||
Basic loss per Common Share: | |||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders per weighted average common share | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | |
Diluted loss per Common Share: | |||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders per weighted average common share | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) |
(1) Unvested restricted shares and unvested long-term incentive plan units that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share, for the periods where a loss has been recorded, because they would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented.
12. Equity Incentive Plan
The Company maintains its Equity Incentive Plan to attract and retain independent trustees, executive officers and other key employees and service providers. The plan provides for the grant of options to purchase common shares, share awards, share appreciation rights, performance units and other equity-based awards. The plan was amended and restated as of May 17, 2013 to increase the maximum number of shares available under the plan to 3,000,000 shares. Share awards under this plan generally vest over three years, though compensation for the Company’s independent trustees includes shares granted that vest immediately. The Company pays dividends on unvested shares and units, except for performance based shares, for which dividends on unvested performance based shares are not paid until those shares are vested. Certain awards may provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control. In January 2014 and 2013, the Company issued 16,542 and 22,536 common shares, respectively, to its independent trustees as compensation for services performed in 2013 and 2012. The quantity of shares was calculated based on the average of the closing prices for the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange for the last ten trading days preceding the reporting date. The Company would have distributed 5,028 common shares had this liability classified award been satisfied as of March 31, 2014. As of March 31, 2014, there were 2,296,458 common shares available for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan.
13
Restricted Share Awards
A summary of the shares granted to executive officers pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan as of March 31, 2014 are:
Award Type | Award Date | Total Shares Granted | Vested as of March 31, 2014 | ||||
2012 Time-based Awards | 2/23/2012 | 61,376 | 40,918 | ||||
2012 Performance-based Awards | 2/23/2012 | 53,191 | 35,462 | ||||
2013 Time-based Awards | 1/29/2013 | 40,829 | 13,611 | ||||
2013 Performance-based Awards | 5/17/2013 | 40,829 | 13,611 | ||||
2014 Time-based Awards | 1/31/2014 | 48,213 | — | ||||
2014 Performance-based Awards | 1/31/2014 | 38,805 | — |
Time-based shares will vest over a three-year period. The performance-based shares will be issued and vest over a three-year period only if and to the extent that long-term performance criteria established by the Board of Trustees are met and the recipient remains employed by the Company through the vesting date.
The Company measures compensation expense for time-based vesting restricted share awards based upon the fair market value of its common shares at the date of grant. For the performance-based shares granted in 2012, 2013 and 2014, compensation expense is based on a valuation of $10.20, $10.93 and $13.17, respectively, per performance share granted, which takes into account that some or all of the awards may not vest if long-term performance criteria are not met during the vesting period. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period and is included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company pays dividends on non-vested time-based restricted shares. Dividends for performance-based shares are accrued and paid annually only if and to the extent that long-term performance criteria established by the Board of Trustees are met and the recipient remains employed by the Company on the vesting date.
A summary of the Company’s restricted share awards for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and year ended December 31, 2013 is as follows:
March 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Number of Shares | Weighted - Average Grant Date Fair Value | Number of Shares | Weighted - Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||||||
Non-vested at beginning of the period | 158,035 | $ | 12.39 | 140,077 | $ | 12.70 | |||||||
Granted | 87,018 | 17.46 | 81,658 | 13.43 | |||||||||
Vested | (65,412 | ) | 12.17 | (63,700 | ) | 14.39 | |||||||
Non-vested at end of the period | 179,641 | $ | 14.92 | 158,035 | $ | 12.39 |
As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were $2.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted share awards. As of March 31, 2014, these costs were expected to be recognized over a weighted–average period of approximately 2.3 years. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized approximately $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of expense related to the restricted share awards. This expense is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
14
Long-Term Incentive Plan Units
The Company recorded $0.2 million and $0.2 million in compensation expense related to the LTIP Units for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there was $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to LTIP Units. This cost is expected to be recognized over approximately 1.1 years, which represents the weighted average remaining vesting period of the LTIP Units. Upon the closing of the Company's equity offering on September 30, 2013, the Company determined that a revaluation event occurred, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and 26,250 LTIPS units of one of the officers of the Company achieved full parity with the common Operating Partnership units with respect to liquidating distributions and all other purposes. Three-fifths of these units have vested. Accordingly, these LTIP units will be allocated their pro-rata share of the Company's net loss.
13. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The nature of the operations of the hotels exposes the hotels, the Company and the Operating Partnership to the risk of claims and litigation in the normal course of their business. The Company is not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to the Company’s knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company or its properties.
Hotel Ground Rent
The Altoona hotel is subject to a ground lease with an expiration date of April 30, 2029 with an extension option of up to 12 additional terms of five years each. Monthly payments are determined by the quarterly average room occupancy of the hotel. Rent is equal to approximately $7,500 per month when monthly occupancy is less than 85% and can increase up to approximately $20,000 per month if occupancy is 100%, with minimum rent increased on an annual basis by two and one-half percent (2.5%).
At the New Rochelle Residence Inn, there is an air rights lease and garage lease that each expire on December 1, 2104. The lease agreements with the City of New Rochelle cover the space above the parking garage that is occupied by the hotel as well as 128 parking spaces in a parking garage that is attached to the hotel. The annual base rent for the garage lease is the hotel’s proportionate share of the city’s adopted budget for the operations, management and maintenance of the garage and established reserves to fund for the cost of capital repairs.
Future minimum rental payments under the terms of all non-cancellable operating ground leases under which the Company is the lessee are expensed on a straight-line basis regardless of when payments are due. The following is a schedule of the minimum future obligation payments required under the ground, air rights and garages leases as of March 31, 2014, for the remainder of 2014 and for each of the next four calendar years and thereafter (in thousands):
Amount | |||
2014 (remaining nine months) | $ | 156 | |
2015 | 210 | ||
2016 | 212 | ||
2017 | 214 | ||
2018 | 217 | ||
Thereafter | 11,228 | ||
Total | $ | 12,237 |
Management Agreements
The management agreements with Concord have an initial ten-year term that expires on February 28, 2017 and will renew automatically for successive one-year terms unless terminated by the TRS lessee or the manager by written notice to the other party no later than 90 days prior to the then current term’s expiration date. The management agreements may be terminated for cause, including the failure of the managed hotel operating performance to meet specified levels. If the Company were to terminate the management agreements during the first nine years of the term other than for breach or default by the manager, the Company would be responsible for paying termination fees to the manager.
15
The management agreements with IHM have an initial term of five years and may be renewed for two five-year periods at IHM’s option by written notice to us no later than 90 days prior to the then current term’s expiration date. The IHM management agreements provide for early termination at the Company’s option upon sale of any IHM-managed hotel for no termination fee, with six months advance notice. The IHM management agreements may be terminated for cause, including the failure of the managed hotel to meet specified performance levels.
Terms of the Company's management agreements are:
Property | Management Company | Base Management Fee | Monthly Accounting Fee | Monthly Revenue Management Fee | Incentive Management Fee | ||||
Courtyard Altoona | Concord | 4.0 | % | 1,211 | — | — | % | ||
Springhill Suites Washington | Concord | 4.0 | % | 991 | — | — | % | ||
Homewood Suites by Hilton Boston-Billerica/ Bedford/ Burlington | IHM | 2.0 | % | 1,000 | 550 | 1.0 | % | ||
Homewood Suites by Hilton Minneapolis-Mall of America | IHM | 2.0 | % | 1,000 | 550 | 1.0 | % | ||
Homewood Suites by Hilton Nashville-Brentwood | IHM | 2.0 | % | 1,000 | 550 | 1.0 | % | ||
Homewood Suites by Hilton Dallas-Market Center | IHM | 2.0 | % | 1,000 | 550 | 1.0 | % | ||
Homewood Suites by Hilton Hartford-Farmington | IHM | 2.0 | % | 1,000 | 550 | 1.0 | % | ||
Homewood Suites by Hilton Orlando-Maitland | IHM | 2.0 | % | 1,000 | 550 | 1.0 | % | ||
Homewood Suites by Hilton Carlsbad (North San Diego County) | IHM | 3.0 | % | 1,000 | — | 1.0 | % | ||
Hampton Inn & Suites Houston-Medical Center | IHM | 3.0 | % | 1,000 | — | 1.0 | % | ||
Residence Inn Long Island Holtsville | IHM | 3.0 | % | 1,000 | — | 1.0 | % | ||
Residence Inn White Plains | IHM | 3.0 | % | 1,000 | — | 1.0 | % | ||
Residence Inn New Rochelle | IHM | 3.0 | % | 1,000 | — | 1.0 | % | ||
Residence Inn Garden Grove | IHM | 2.5 | % | 1,000 | — | 1.0 | % | ||
Residence Inn Mission Valley | IHM | 2.5 | % | 1,000 | — | 1.0 | % | ||
Homewood Suites by Hilton San Antonio River Walk | IHM | 2.5 | % | 1,000 | — | 1.0 | % | ||
Residence Inn Washington DC | IHM | 2.5 | % | 1,000 | — | 1.0 | % | ||
Residence Inn Tysons Corner | IHM | 2.5 | % | 1,000 | — | 1.0 | % | ||
Hampton Inn Portland Downtown | IHM | 3.0 | % | 1,000 | 550 | 1.0 | % | ||
Courtyard Houston | IHM | 3.0 | % | 1,000 | 550 | 1.0 | % | ||
Hyatt Place Pittsburgh North Shore | IHM | 3.0 | % | 1,500 | 1,000 | 1.0 | % | ||
Hampton Inn Exeter | IHM | 3.0 | % | 1,200 | 1,000 | 1.0 | % | ||
Hilton Garden Inn Denver Tech | IHM | 3.0 | % | 1,500 | 1,000 | 1.0 | % | ||
Residence Inn Bellevue | IHM | 3.0 | % | 1,200 | 1,000 | 1.0 | % | ||
Springhill Suites Savannah | IHM | 3.0 | % | 1,200 | 1,000 | 1.0 | % |
Management fees totaled approximately $1.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
16
Franchise Agreements
Terms of the Company's Franchise agreements are:
Property | Franchise/Royalty Fee | Marketing/Program Fee | Expiration | ||
Homewood Suites by Hilton Boston-Billerica/ Bedford/ Burlington | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 2025 |
Homewood Suites by Hilton Minneapolis-Mall of America | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 2025 |
Homewood Suites by Hilton Nashville-Brentwood | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 2025 |
Homewood Suites by Hilton Dallas-Market Center | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 2025 |
Homewood Suites by Hilton Hartford-Farmington | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 2025 |
Homewood Suites by Hilton Orlando-Maitland | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 2025 |
Homewood Suites by Hilton Carlsbad (North San Diego County) | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 2028 |
Hampton Inn & Suites Houston-Medical Center | 5.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 2020 |
Courtyard Altoona | 5.5 | % | 2.0 | % | 2030 |
Springhill Suites Washington | 5.0 | % | 2.5 | % | 2030 |
Residence Inn Long Island Holtsville | 5.5 | % | 2.5 | % | 2025 |
Residence Inn White Plains | 5.5 | % | 2.5 | % | 2030 |
Residence Inn New Rochelle | 5.5 | % | 2.5 | % | 2030 |
Residence Inn Garden Grove | 5.0 | % | 2.5 | % | 2031 |
Residence Inn Mission Valley | 5.0 | % | 2.5 | % | 2031 |
Homewood Suites by Hilton San Antonio River Walk | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 2026 |
Residence Inn Washington DC | 5.5 | % | 2.5 | % | 2033 |
Residence Inn Tysons Corner | 5.0 | % | 2.5 | % | 2031 |
Hampton Inn Portland Downtown | 6.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 2032 |
Courtyard Houston | 5.5 | % | 2.0 | % | 2030 |
Hyatt Place Pittsburgh North Shore | 5.0 | % | 3.5 | % | 2030 |
Hampton Inn Exeter | 6.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 2031 |
Hilton Garden Inn Denver Tech | 4.3 | % | 5.5 | % | 2028 |
Residence Inn Bellevue | 5.5 | % | 2.5 | % | 2033 |
Springhill Suites Savannah | 5.0 | % | 2.5 | % | 2033 |
Franchise fees totaled approximately $2.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
14. Related Party Transactions
Mr. Fisher owns 90% of IHM. As of March 31, 2014, the Company had hotel management agreements with IHM to manage 23 of its hotels. As of March 31, 2014, all 51 hotels owned by the Innkeepers JV are managed by IHM. Hotel management, revenue management and accounting fees paid to IHM for the Chatham properties for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were $1.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the amounts due to IHM were $0.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
17
Cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities revenue represents reimbursements of costs incurred on behalf of the Innkeepers JV. These costs relate primarily to corporate payroll costs at the Innkeepers JV where the Company is the employer. As the Company records cost reimbursements based upon costs incurred with no added markup, the revenue and related expense has no impact on the Company’s operating income or net income. Cost reimbursements from the Innkeepers JV are recorded based upon the occurrence of a reimbursed activity.
15. Subsequent Events
Announced in late January, the joint venture began marketing for sale its 51-hotel, 6,848- room portfolio. The joint venture agreed to sell the portfolio for a gross purchase price of $1.3 billion, before capital expenditure reserves credited to the buyers of $39.7 million, in which a joint venture between Northstar and Chatham will acquire 47 of the hotels and Chatham will acquire 4 of the hotels. Northstar will acquire Cerberus’ 89.7 percent interest in the joint venture, and Chatham will retain its 10.3 percent ownership stake. The joint venture will acquire 47 of the 51 hotels for a gross purchase price of $958.5 million, a net cash purchase price of $933.9 million. Chatham will acquire four Silicon Valley Residence Inn hotels from the Cerberus/Chatham portfolio, comprising 751 rooms, for a net cash purchase price of $272.6 million. The Company currently has a non-refundable deposit of $7.9 million in escrow for the Innkeepers transactions. There can be no assurances that the transactions will close at the aforementioned amounts or at all.
The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events from the balance sheet date through May 9, 2014, the date of the issuance of the financial statements, and concluded there were no other events or transactions during this period that required recognition or disclosure in its financial statements.
18
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. In this report, we used the terms “the Company, “we” or “our” to refer to Chatham Lodging Trust and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
The following information contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of the lodging industry, our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, cash flow and plans and objectives. These statements generally are characterized by the use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “continue,” “intend,” “should,” “may” or similar expressions. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Some factors that might cause such a difference include the following: the local, national and global economic conditions, increased direct competition, changes in government regulations or accounting rules, changes in local, national and global real estate conditions, declines in lodging industry fundamentals, increased operating costs, seasonality of the lodging industry, our ability to obtain debt and equity financing on satisfactory terms, changes in interest rates, our ability to identify suitable investments, our ability to close on identified investments and inaccuracies of our accounting estimates. Given these uncertainties, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. The forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risk factors identified in the “Risk Factors” section in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as updated elsewhere in this report.
Overview
We are a self-advised hotel investment company organized in October 2009 that commenced operations in April 2010. Our investment strategy is to invest in premium-branded upscale extended-stay and select-service hotels in geographically diverse markets with high barriers to entry near strong demand generators. We may acquire portfolios of hotels or single hotels. We expect that a significant portion of our portfolio will consist of hotels in the upscale extended-stay or select-service categories, including brands such as Homewood Suites by Hilton®, Residence Inn by Marriott®, Hyatt Place®, Courtyard by Marriott®, Hilton Garden Inn by Hilton®, Hampton Inn® and Hampton Inn and Suites®.
Our long-term goal is to maintain our leverage at a ratio of net debt to investment in hotels (at cost) at less than 35%. However, we and our Board of Trustees are comfortable at levels in excess of that amount at this point of the hotel economic cycle especially given the borrowing rates available in today's credit markets. This provides us with balance sheet flexibility to use debt to fund external growth via acquisitions. Our leverage ratio at March 31, 2014 is 37%, which is up from 36% at December 31, 2013.
Future growth through acquisitions could be funded by issuances of both common and preferred shares, draw-downs under our credit facility, the incurrence or assumption of debt, available cash, proceeds from dispositions of assets or distributions from our 10.3% investment in INK Acquisition, LLC and affiliates, a joint venture (the “Innkeepers JV”) with Cerberus Capital Management (“Cerberus”) that owns 51 hotels (the “Innkeepers JV”) or distributions from our 5.0% investment in a joint venture with Cerberus that owns the Residence Inn by Marriott in Torrance, CA (the "Torrance JV") as of March 31, 2014. We intend to acquire quality assets at attractive prices, improve their returns through knowledgeable asset management and seasoned, proven hotel management while remaining prudently leveraged.
We believe the remainder of 2014 and beyond will offer attractive growth for the lodging industry and for us because lodging demand is projected to surpass supply growth for the next few years. Increased demand is correlative to economic growth in the U.S. and with Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) expected to moderately grow, we believe demand will increase.
We elected to qualify for treatment as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), we cannot operate our hotels. Therefore, our operating partnership, Chatham Lodging, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), and its subsidiaries lease our hotel properties to taxable REIT lessee subsidiaries (“TRS Lessees”), who will in turn engage eligible independent contractors to manage the hotels. Each of these lessees is treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary for federal income tax purposes and is consolidated within our financial statements for accounting purposes. However, since we control both the Operating
19
Partnership and the TRS Lessees, our principal source of funds on a consolidated basis is from the operations of our hotels. The earnings of the TRS Lessees are subject to taxation as regular C corporations, as defined in the Code, potentially reducing the TRS Lessees’ cash available to pay dividends to us, and therefore our funds from operations and the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
Financial Condition and Operating Performance Metrics
We measure financial condition and hotel operating performance by evaluating financial metrics and measures such as:
• | Revenue Per Available Room (“RevPAR”), |
• | Average Daily Rate (“ADR”), |
• | Occupancy percentage, |
• | Funds From Operations (“FFO”), |
• | Adjusted FFO, |
• | Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), and |
• | Adjusted EBITDA. |
We evaluate the hotels in our portfolio and potential acquisitions using these metrics to determine each hotel’s contribution toward providing income to our shareholders through increases in distributable cash flow and increasing long-term total returns through appreciation in the value of our common shares. RevPAR, ADR and Occupancy are hotel industry measures commonly used to evaluate operating performance. RevPAR, which is calculated as total room revenue divided by total number of available rooms, is an important metric for monitoring hotel operating performance, and more specifically hotel revenue.
“Non-GAAP Financial Measures” provides a detailed discussion of our use of FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net income or loss, measurements recognized by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”).
Results of Operations
Industry outlook
We believe that the hotel industry’s performance is correlated to the performance of the economy overall, and specifically key economic indicators such as GDP growth, employment trends, corporate travel and corporate profits. We expect a continuing improvement in the performance of the hotel industry as GDP is forecast to grow approximately 3.0% in 2014, unemployment is forecast to continue to decline and corporate profits and travel expense are expected to continue to rise. As reported by Smith Travel Research, monthly industry RevPAR has been higher year over year since March 2010. As reported by Smith Travel Research, industry RevPAR in 2013 was up 6.4% and was up 6.8% year to date through March 31, 2014 compared to the same periods in the respective prior year. Industry analysts such as Smith Travel Research and PKF Hospitality are projecting industry RevPAR to grow 5-6% in 2014 based on sustained economic growth, lack of new supply and increased business travel spending. Of the projected growth, industry analysts believe growth in ADR will comprise the majority of the expected RevPAR growth. Primary hotel franchisors Marriott, Hilton, Hyatt and Starwood are projecting 2014 RevPAR growth in North America in a range of 4-7%. We are currently projecting RevPAR at our hotels to grow 5-6% in 2014 with ADR comprising most of our RevPAR growth. Looking further ahead to 2015, Smith Travel Research and PKF Hospitality, predict that RevPAR will continue to grow in 2015 with preliminary estimates between 4.7% and 7.5%.
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2014 (“2014”) to the three months ended March 31, 2013 (“2013”)
Results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 include the operating activities of our 25 wholly-owned hotels and our investments in the Innkeepers JV and the Torrance JV. We owned 20 hotels at March 31, 2013. Accordingly, the comparisons below are influenced by the fact that five hotels and the Torrance JV were not owned by us for all of the first quarter of 2013, whereas they were owned by us for all of the first quarter of 2014.
As reported by Smith Travel Research, industry RevPAR for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was up 6.8% and up 6.4%, respectively, as compared to the first quarter for 2013 and 2012. RevPAR at our hotels was up 7.8% and 4.2%, respectively, in the 2014 and 2013 periods as compared to the first quarter of 2013 and 2012. The first quarter of 2013 was adversely impacted by renovations that occurred at our Washington, D.C. hotel, which operated without a brand for two months in the first quarter of 2013 until it was rebranded to a Residence Inn by Marriott on September 20, 2013.
20
Revenues
Revenue consists of the following (in thousands):
For the three months ended | ||||||||||
March 31, 2014 | March 31, 2013 | % Change | ||||||||
Room | $ | 33,958 | $ | 24,235 | 40.1 | % | ||||
Food and beverage | 628 | 150 | 318.7 | % | ||||||
Other | 1,608 | 1,011 | 59.1 | % | ||||||
Cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities | 672 | 383 | 75.5 | % | ||||||
Total revenue | $ | 36,866 | $ | 25,779 | 43.0 | % |
Total revenue was $36.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, up $11.1 million compared to total revenue of $25.8 million for the 2013 period. Total revenue related to the five hotels not owned in the 2013 first quarter contributed $7.9 million of the increase. Since all of our hotels are select service or limited service hotels, room revenue is the primary revenue source as these hotels do not have significant food and beverage revenue or large group conference facilities. Room revenue was $34.0 million and $24.2 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, with $7.0 million of this increase attributable to the five recently acquired hotels. For the 20 comparable hotels, room revenue was up $2.8 million, or 11.6%, driven primarily by RevPAR growth of 7.8%.
Food and beverage revenue was $0.6 million and $0.2 million for three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase relates to the Hyatt Place Pittsburgh Hotel and the Houston Courtyard hotel, which were acquired during or after the first quarter of 2013 and have food and beverage operations.
Other operating revenue, comprised of meeting room, gift shop, in-room movie and other ancillary amenities revenue, was $1.6 million and $1.0 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Total other operating revenue related to the five hotels not owned in the 2013 first quarter contributed $0.5 million of the increase.
Cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities, comprised of payroll costs at the Innkeepers JV where the Company is the employer, were $0.7 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase is due to higher annual incentive compensation for dedicated joint venture employees.
Since room revenue is the primary component of total revenue, our revenue results are dependent on maintaining and improving hotel occupancy, ADR and RevPAR at our hotels. Occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR results for the 25 wholly owned hotels are presented in the following table in each period to reflect operation of the hotels regardless of our ownership interest during the periods presented:
For the three months ended | For the three months ended | ||||||
March 31, 2014 | March 31, 2013 | ||||||
Occupancy | 77.3 | % | 74.0 | % | |||
ADR | $ | 135.84 | $ | 131.67 | |||
RevPar | $ | 105.01 | $ | 97.37 |
The RevPar increase of 7.8% was due to an increase in ADR of 3.2% and an increase in occupancy of 4.5%. Occupancy at the D.C. hotel increased 44.3% in the 2014 first quarter over the first quarter of 2013. Excluding the D.C. hotel, 2014 first quarter RevPar was up 6.5%.
21
Hotel Operating Expenses
Hotel operating expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
For the three months ended | ||||||||||
March 31, 2014 | March 31, 2013 | % Change | ||||||||
Hotel operating expenses: | ||||||||||
Room | $ | 7,755 | $ | 5,551 | 39.7 | % | ||||
Food and beverage expense | 466 | 134 | 247.8 | % | ||||||
Telephone expense | 287 | 191 | 50.3 | % | ||||||
Other expense | 443 | 348 | 27.3 | % | ||||||
General and administrative | 3,426 | 2,578 | 32.9 | % | ||||||
Franchise and marketing fees | 2,793 | 1,901 | 46.9 | % | ||||||
Advertising and promotions | 831 | 657 | 26.5 | % | ||||||
Utilities | 1,620 | 1,065 | 52.1 | % | ||||||
Repairs and maintenance | 1,999 | 1,445 | 38.3 | % | ||||||
Management fees | 1,094 | 671 | 63.0 | % | ||||||
Insurance | 215 | 171 | 25.7 | % | ||||||
Total hotel operating expenses | $ | 20,929 | $ | 14,712 | 42.3 | % |
Hotel operating expenses increased $6.2 million to $20.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 from $14.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Total hotel operating expenses related to the five hotels not owned in the 2013 first quarter contributed $4.6 million of the increase. Excluding the five hotels, total room operating expenses increased $1.6 million or 10.9%.
Room expenses, which are the most significant component of hotel operating expenses, increased $2.2 million from $5.6 million in 2013 to $7.8 million in 2014. Total room expenses related to the five hotels not owned in the 2013 first quarter contributed $1.7 million of the increase. Excluding these five hotels, total room operating expenses increased $0.5 million or 8.9%. Expenses increased due to occupancy and salaries.
The remaining hotel operating expenses increased $4.0 million, from $9.2 million in 2013 to $13.2 million in 2014, which 43.8% increase is consistent with the increase in the number of rooms owned in 2014 compared to 2013 of 31.5%. The number of rooms for the quarter increased from 2,731 rooms in 2013 to 3,591 rooms in 2014 due to acquisitions. The increase in remaining hotel operating expenses attributable to the recent acquisitions is $2.9 million. Food and beverage expense increased due to the Hyatt Place Pittsburgh and Houston Courtyard hotels that were acquired during or after the first quarter of 2013 and have food and beverage operations where as most of our other hotels have limited for sale food and beverage activities.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.5 million from $3.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to $6.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The increase is due to the five hotels not owned in the 2013 first quarter, which contributed $1.8 million of the increase. The remaining increase is attributable to renovations performed in 2013 and 2014. Depreciation is recorded on our hotel buildings over 40 years from the date of acquisition. Depreciable lives of hotel furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally three to ten years between the date of acquisition and the date that the furniture, fixtures and equipment will be replaced. Amortization of franchise fees is recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective franchise agreement.
Property Taxes and Insurance
Total property taxes and insurance expenses increased $0.7 million from $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The five hotels not owned in the 2013 first quarter contributed $0.5 million of the increase.
22
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses principally consist of employee-related costs, including base payroll, bonuses and amortization of restricted stock and awards of long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) units. These expenses also include corporate operating costs, professional fees and trustees’ fees. Total general and administrative expenses (excluding amortization of stock based compensation of $0.6 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively) increased $0.2 million to $1.7 million in 2014 from $1.5 million in 2013 with the increase due to higher employee compensation.
Hotel Property Acquisition Costs and Other Charges
Hotel property acquisition costs and other charges increased $1.3 million from $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Hotel property acquisition cost in the 2014 period related to our acquisitions of the five recently acquired hotels was $0.3 million. Acquisition-related costs are expensed when incurred. The Company incurred other charges of $1.2 million in the 2014 period related to matters associated with the unsolicited offer from Blue Mountain Capital Management and matters related to its proxy settlement agreement with the HG Vora Group. The expense is primarily comprised of attorney's fees of $0.4 million, financial advisory expenses of $0.7 million and other costs of $0.1 million.
Reimbursed Costs from Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities
Reimbursed costs from unconsolidated real estate entities, comprised of corporate payroll costs at the Innkeepers JV where the Company is the employer were $0.7 million and $0.4 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These costs were offset by the cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities included in revenues.
Interest and Other Income
Interest on cash and cash equivalents and other income increased $8 thousand from $5 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to $13 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2014.
Interest Expense, including amortization of deferred fees
Interest expense increased $0.9 million from $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to $3.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and is comprised of the following (in thousands):
For the three months ended | ||||||||||
March 31, 2014 | March 31, 2013 | % Change | ||||||||
Mortgage debt interest | $ | 2,822 | $ | 1,902 | 48.4 | % | ||||
Credit facility interest and unused fees | 521 | 631 | (17.4 | )% | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 395 | 308 | 28.2 | % | ||||||
Total | $ | 3,738 | $ | 2,841 | 31.6 | % |
The increase in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013 is due to interest expense of $1.1 million on loans of $91.2 million acquired after March 31, 2013 offset by reduced interest expense on three loans refinanced in the 2013 first quarter and the full repayment of the Washington, D.C. hotel loan on January 31, 2013. Lower credit facility interest is due to a decrease in the weighted average borrowings to $60.0 million in 2014 compared to $81.4 million in 2013. The increase in deferred financing costs relates to the new loans issued in 2013.
Loss from Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities
Loss from unconsolidated real estate entities decreased $0.3 million from a loss of $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to a loss of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The decrease is due to increased hotel EBITDA, a reduction in interest expense and the elimination of all amortization related to franchise conversion costs which ended in 2013.
23
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense increased $3 thousand from $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to an expense of $3 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2014. We are subject to income taxes based on the taxable income of our taxable REIT subsidiary holding companies at a combined federal and state tax rate of approximately 40%.
Net income
Net loss was $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to a net loss of $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The net loss was due to the factors discussed above.
Material Trends or Uncertainties
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, favorable or unfavorable, that may be reasonably anticipated to have a material impact on either the capital resources or the revenues or income to be derived from the acquisition and operation of properties, loans and other permitted investments, other than those referred to in the risk factors identified in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We consider the following non-GAAP financial measures useful to investors as key supplemental measures of our operating performance: (1) FFO, (2) Adjusted FFO, (3) EBITDA, and (4) Adjusted EBITDA. These non-GAAP financial measures could be considered along with, but not as alternatives to, net income or loss as prescribed by GAAP as a measure of our operating performance.
FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent cash generated from operating activities under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or loss, cash flows from operations or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP. FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of our liquidity, nor are FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. These measurements do not reflect cash expenditures for long-term assets and other items that have been and will be incurred. FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may include funds that may not be available for management’s discretionary use due to functional requirements to conserve funds for capital expenditures, property acquisitions, and other commitments and uncertainties.
We calculate FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts (NAREIT), which defines FFO as net income or loss (calculated in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate, impairment write-downs, items classified by GAAP as extraordinary, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, plus depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs), and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures following the same approach. We believe that the presentation of FFO provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance because it measures our performance without regard to specified non-cash items such as real estate depreciation and amortization, gain or loss on sale of real estate assets and certain other items that we believe are not indicative of the performance of our underlying hotel properties. We believe that these items are more representative of our asset base and our acquisition and disposition activities than our ongoing operations, and that by excluding the effects of the items, FFO is useful to investors in comparing our operating performance between periods and between REITs that report FFO using the NAREIT definition.
We further adjust FFO for certain additional items that are not in NAREIT’s definition of FFO, including hotel property acquisition costs and other charges, losses on the early extinguishment of debt and similar items related to our unconsolidated real estate entities that we believe do not represent recurring operations. We believe that Adjusted FFO provides investors with another financial measure that may facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between REITs that make similar adjustments to FFO.
24
The following is a reconciliation of net income to FFO and Adjusted FFO for the three months ended March 31 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except share data):
For the three months ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Funds From Operations (“FFO”): | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,732 | ) | $ | (1,618 | ) | |
Loss on the sale of assets within the unconsolidated real estate entity | 1 | 15 | |||||
Depreciation | 6,288 | 3,737 | |||||
Adjustments for unconsolidated real estate entity items | 1,205 | 1,241 | |||||
FFO | 5,762 | 3,375 | |||||
Hotel property acquisition costs and other charges | 1,482 | 177 | |||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 184 | 933 | |||||
Adjustments for unconsolidated real estate entity items | 2 | 3 | |||||
Adjusted FFO | $ | 7,430 | $ | 4,488 | |||
Weighted average number of common shares | |||||||
Basic | 26,271,678 | 17,212,124 | |||||
Diluted | 26,536,763 | 17,408,275 |
Diluted per share count may differ from GAAP per share count when FFO or Adjusted FFO is positive. Unvested restricted shares and unvested long-term incentive plan units that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share, for the periods where a loss has been recorded, because they would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented.
We calculate EBITDA for purposes of the credit facility debt covenants as net income or loss excluding: (1) interest expense; (2) provision for income taxes, including income taxes applicable to sale of assets; (3) depreciation and amortization; and (4) unconsolidated real estate entity items including interest, depreciation and amortization excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate. We believe EBITDA is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because it helps investors compare our operating performance between periods and between REITs by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense) and asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) from our operating results. In addition, we use EBITDA as one measure in determining the value of hotel acquisitions and dispositions.
We further adjust EBITDA for certain additional items, including hotel property acquisition costs and other charges, losses on the early extinguishment of debt, amortization of non-cash share-based compensation and similar items related to our unconsolidated real estate entities which we believe are not indicative of the performance of our underlying hotel properties entities. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides investors with another financial measure that may facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between REITs that report similar measures.
25
The following is a reconciliation of net increase to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
For the three months ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”): | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,732 | ) | $ | (1,618 | ) | |
Interest expense | 3,738 | 2,841 | |||||
Income tax expense | 3 | — | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 6,316 | 3,756 | |||||
Adjustments for unconsolidated real estate entity items | 2,624 | 2,736 | |||||
EBITDA | 10,949 | 7,715 | |||||
Hotel property acquisition costs and other charges | 1,482 | 177 | |||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 184 | 933 | |||||
Adjustments for unconsolidated real estate entity items | 2 | 3 | |||||
Loss on the sale of assets within the unconsolidated real estate entity | 1 | 15 | |||||
Share based compensation | 585 | 548 | |||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 13,203 | $ | 9,391 |
Although we present FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because we believe they are useful to investors in comparing our operating performance between periods and between REITs that report similar measures, these measures have limitations as analytical tools. Some of these limitations are:
• | FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
• | FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; |
• | FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect funds available to make cash distributions; |
• | EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debts; |
• | Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may need to be replaced in the future, and FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; |
• | Non-cash compensation is and will remain a key element of our overall long-term incentive compensation package, although we exclude it as an expense when evaluating our ongoing operating performance for a particular period using Adjusted EBITDA; |
• | Adjusted FFO and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the impact of certain cash charges (including acquisition transaction costs) that result from matters we consider not to be indicative of the underlying performance of our hotel properties; and |
• | Other companies in our industry may calculate FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as a comparative measure. |
In addition, FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent cash generated from operating activities as determined by GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or loss, cash flows from operations or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP. FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of our liquidity. Because of these limitations, FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally. Our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere are prepared in accordance with GAAP.
26
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our principal sources of cash include net cash from operations and proceeds from debt and equity issuances. Our principal uses of cash include acquisitions, capital expenditures, operating costs, corporate expenditures, interest costs and debt repayments and distributions to equity holders.
As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $5.8 million and $4.2 million, respectively. We typically maintain approximately $5.0 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. Additionally, we had $120.0 million available under our $175.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility as of March 31, 2014.
For the three months ended March 31, 2014, net cash flows provided by operations were $5.0 million, comprised of net loss of $1.7 million and primarily significant non-cash expenses, including $6.7 million of depreciation and amortization, $0.2 million from the extinguishment of debt, $0.6 million of share-based compensation expense and $0.3 million related to the loss from unconsolidated entities. In addition, changes in operating assets and liabilities due to the timing of cash receipts, payments for real estate taxes, payments of corporate compensation and payments from our hotels resulted in net cash outflow of $1.1 million. Net cash flows used in investing activities were $3.4 million, primarily related to capital improvements on our 25 wholly owned hotels of $3.2 million, $0.7 million related to the required escrow deposits of restricted cash, reduced by distributions of $0.5 million from unconsolidated real estate entities. Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $0.1 million, comprised of proceeds from the issuance of refinanced and new mortgage loans of $34.0 million, offset by net borrowings on our secured credit facility of $5.0 million, principal payments or payoffs on mortgage debt of $32.9 million, payments of deferred financing costs of $0.4 million and distributions to shareholders of $5.6 million.
For the three months ended March 31, 2013, net cash flows provided by operations were $4.7 million, comprised of net loss of $1.6 million and primarily significant non-cash expenses, including $4.1 million of depreciation and amortization, $0.9 million from the extinguishment of debt, $0.6 million of share-based compensation expense and a $0.6 million from the loss from unconsolidated entities. In addition, changes in operating assets and liabilities due to the timing of cash receipts, payments for real estate taxes, payments of corporate compensation and payments from our hotels resulted in net cash inflow of $0.1 million. Net cash flows used by investing activities were $37.2 million, primarily related to the purchase of the Houston CY Hotel of $34.8 million, capital improvements on our 20 wholly owned hotels of $3.1 million, offset by $0.7 million related to the receipt of restricted cash for four of our mortgage loans which were either refinanced or paid off. Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $33.1 million, comprised primarily of net borrowings on our secured credit facility of $17.0 million, $52.8 million raised from our January 2013 follow-on common share offering, and proceeds from the issuance of refinanced mortgage loans of $72.8 million, offset by principal payments on mortgage debt of $100.5 million, payments of deferred financing and offering costs of $3.7 million and distributions to shareholders of $5.3 million.
We paid regular quarterly dividends and distributions on common shares and LTIP units beginning with the third quarter of 2010 through 2012. In January 2013, we changed our dividend payment frequency from a quarterly dividend to a monthly dividend. We declared total dividends of $0.21 per common share and LTIP unit for the first quarter of 2013 and 2014 ($0.07 per month), respectively. In April 2014, we changed the monthly dividend to $0.08 per month per common share and LTIP unit.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We intend to maintain our leverage over the long term at a ratio of net debt to investment in hotels (at cost) (defined as our initial acquisition price plus the gross amount of any subsequent capital investment and excluding any impairment charges) to less than 35% measured at the time we incur debt, and a subsequent decrease in hotel property values will not necessarily cause us to repay debt to comply with this limitation. However, our Board of Trustees believes that temporarily increasing our leverage limit at this stage of the lodging recovery cycle is appropriate, so we will continue to make acquisitions where suitable. Our leverage ratio at March 31, 2014 is 37%, which is up from 36% at December 31, 2013. We will pay down borrowings on our secured revolving credit facility with excess cash flow until we find other uses of cash such as investments in our existing hotels, hotel acquisitions or further joint venture investments.
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $55.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively, in borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility. At March 31, 2014, there were 13 properties in the borrowing base under the credit agreement and the maximum borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility was approximately $175.0 million. We also had mortgage debt on individual hotels aggregating $223.2 million and $222.1 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
27
The maturity date of the credit facility is November 5, 2016 and includes an option to extend the maturity date by an additional year. Other key features of the credit facility are as follows:
Facility amount | $175 million | |
Accordion feature | Increase additional $50 million | |
LIBOR floor | None | |
Interest rate applicable margin | 200-300 basis points, based on leverage ratio | |
Unused fee | 25 basis points if less than 50% unused, 35 basis points if more than 50% unused | |
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio | 1.5x |
The credit facility contains representations, warranties, covenants, terms and conditions customary for transactions of this type, including a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum net worth financial covenants, limitations on (i) liens, (ii) incurrence of debt, (iii) investments, (iv) distributions, and (v) mergers and asset dispositions, covenants to preserve corporate existence and comply with laws, covenants on the use of proceeds of the credit facility and default provisions, including defaults for non-payment, breach of representations and warranties, insolvency, non-performance of covenants, cross-defaults and guarantor defaults. We were in compliance with all financial covenants at March 31, 2014. We expect to meet all financial covenants during the remainder of 2014 based upon our current projections.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by operations, existing cash balances and, if necessary, short-term borrowings under our credit facility or through the encumbrance of any unencumbered hotels. We believe that our net cash provided by operations will be adequate to fund operating obligations, pay interest on any borrowings and fund dividends in accordance with the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, such as hotel property acquisitions and debt maturities or repayments through additional long-term secured and unsecured borrowings, the issuance of additional equity or debt securities, including through our dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan ("DRSPP") or controlled equity offering program ("ATM offering program"), each as described below, or the possible sale of existing assets.
Through our DRSPP, which was established in January 2014, shareholders may purchase additional common shares by reinvesting some or all of the cash dividends received on our common shares. Shareholders may also make optional cash purchases of our common shares subject to certain limitations detailed in the prospectus for the DRSPP. As of March 31, 2014, we had not issued any shares under the DRSPP. As of March 31, 2014, there was approximately $25 million of common shares available for issuance under the DRSPP.
In January 2014, we also established an ATM offering program whereby, from time to time, we may publicly offer and sell up to $50 million of our common shares by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the New York Stock Exchange, in negotiated transactions or in transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. acting as sales agent. As of March 31, 2014, we had not issued any shares under the ATM offering program.
We intend to continue to invest in hotel properties only as suitable opportunities arise. We intend to finance our future investments with the net proceeds from additional issuances of common and preferred shares, issuances of units of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership or other securities or borrowings. The success of our acquisition strategy depends, in part, on our ability to access additional capital through issuances of equity securities and borrowings. There can be no assurance that we will continue to make investments in properties that meet our investment criteria. Additionally, we may choose to dispose of certain hotels that do not meet our long-term investment objectives as a means to provide liquidity.
Dividend Policy
Our current common share dividend policy is generally to distribute, annually, at least 100% of our annual taxable income. The amount of any dividends is determined by our Board of Trustees. Our Board of Trustees approved a change in the frequency of our dividend payments to monthly in January 2013, with a targeted monthly dividend of $0.07 per common share and LTIP unit for 2013. The aggregate amount of dividends declared for the three months ended March 31 2014 were $0.21 per common share and LTIP unit. In April 2014, our Board of Trustees approved an increase to our monthly dividend to $0.08 per common share and LTIP unit.
28
Capital Expenditures
We intend to maintain each hotel property in good repair and condition and in conformity with applicable laws and regulations and in accordance with the franchisor’s standards and any agreed-upon requirements in our management and loan agreements. After we acquire a hotel property, we may be required to complete a property improvement plan (“PIP”) in order to be granted a new franchise license for that particular hotel property. PIPs are intended to bring the hotel property up to the franchisor’s standards. Certain of our loans require that we escrow for property improvement purposes, at the hotels collateralizing these loans, amounts up to 5% of gross revenue from such hotels. We intend to spend amounts necessary to
comply with any reasonable loan or franchisor requirements and otherwise to the extent that such expenditures are in the best interest of the hotel. To the extent that we spend more on capital expenditures than is available from our operations, we intend to fund those capital expenditures with available cash and borrowings under the revolving credit facility.
For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, we invested approximately $3.7 million and $3.9 million, respectively, on capital investments in our hotels. We expect to invest an additional $12.3 million on capital improvements on our existing hotels for the remainder of 2014.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2014, and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands). We had no other material off-balance sheet arrangements at March 31, 2014 other than non-recourse debt associated with the Innkeepers JV and the Torrance JV as discussed below.
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Less Than One Year | One to Three Years | Three to Five Years | More Than Five Years | ||||||||||||||
Corporate office lease | $ | 54 | $ | 30 | $ | 24 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Revolving credit facility, including interest (1) | 60,021 | 1,412 | 58,609 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Ground leases | 12,237 | 156 | 422 | 431 | 11,228 | ||||||||||||||
Property loans, including interest (1) | 293,703 | 10,113 | 38,134 | 27,052 | 218,404 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 366,015 | $ | 11,711 | $ | 97,189 | $ | 27,483 | $ | 229,632 |
(1) | Does not reflect paydowns or additional borrowings under the revolving credit facility after March 31, 2014. Interest payments are based on the interest rate in effect as of March 31, 2014. See Note 8, “Debt” to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information relating to our property loans. |
In addition, we pay management fees to our hotel management companies based on the revenues of our hotels.
The Company’s ownership interests in the Innkeepers JV and the Torrance JV are subject to change in the event that either Chatham or Cerberus calls for additional capital contributions to the Innkeepers JV or the Torrance JV, as applicable, necessary for the conduct of that JV's business, including contributions to fund costs and expenses related to capital expenditures. We manage the Innkeepers JV and the Torrance JV and will receive a promote interest in the applicable JV if it meets certain return thresholds. Cerberus may also approve certain actions by either JV without the Company’s consent, including certain property dispositions conducted at arm’s length, certain actions related to the restructuring of either JV and removal of the Company as managing member in the event the Company fails to fulfill its material obligations under either joint venture agreement.
In connection with certain non-recourse mortgage loans in either the Innkeepers JV or the Torrance JV, our Operating Partnership could require us to repay our pro rata share of portions of their indebtedness in connection with certain customary non-recourse carve-out provisions such as environmental conditions, misuse of funds, and material misrepresentations.
Inflation
Operators of hotels, in general, possess the ability to adjust room rates daily to reflect the effects of inflation. However, competitive pressures may limit the ability of our management companies to raise room rates.
29
Seasonality
Demand for our hotels is affected by recurring seasonal patterns. Generally, we expect that we will have lower revenue, operating income and cash flow in the first and fourth quarters and higher revenue, operating income and cash flow in the second and third quarters. These general trends are, however, influenced by overall economic cycles and the geographic locations of our hotels.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. While we do not believe the reported amounts would be materially different, application of these policies involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies, including certain critical accounting policies, are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In April 2014, the FASB issued amendments to guidance for reporting discontinued operations and disposals of components of an entity. The amended guidance requires that a disposal representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s opeations and financial results or a business activity classified as held for sale upon acquisition should be reported as discontinued operations. The amendments also expand the disclosure requirements for discontinued operations and add new disclosures for individually significant dispositions that do not qualify as discontinued operations. The amendments are effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014 (early adoption is permitted only for disposals that have not been previously reported). The implementation of the amended guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations but could have an impact on our financial statement presentation and required disclosures. Early adoption is permitted for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. We adopted this accounting standard update effective January 1, 2014.
30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
We may be exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our assumption of long-term debt in connection with our acquisitions. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we will seek to borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to fixed rates. With respect to variable rate financing, we will assess interest rate risk by identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.
The Company estimates the fair value of its fixed rate debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates. Rates take into consideration general market conditions and maturity and fair value of the underlying collateral. The estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $222.9 million and $220.0 million, respectively.
At March 31, 2014, our consolidated debt was comprised of floating and fixed interest rate debt. The fair value of our fixed rate debt indicates the estimated principal amount of debt having the same debt service requirements that could have been borrowed at the date presented, at then current market interest rates. The following table provides information about the maturities of our financial instruments as of March 31, 2014 that are sensitive to changes in interest rates (in thousands):
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||
Floating rate: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt | — | — | $ | 55,000 | — | — | — | $ | 55,000 | $ | 54,993 | |||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate (1) | — | — | 2.66 | % | — | — | — | 2.66 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt | $1,910 | $8,315 | $9,533 | $ | 3,832 | $ | 3,948 | $195,620 | $ | 223,158 | $ | 222,860 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 4.91 | % | 5.41 | % | 5.51 | % | 4.77 | % | 4.78 | % | 4.76 | % | 4.81 | % |
(1) | LIBOR of 0.16% plus a margin of 2.50% at March 31, 2014. |
We estimate that a hypothetical one-percentage point increase in the variable interest rate would result in additional interest expense of approximately $0.6 million annually. This assumes that the amount outstanding under our floating rate debt remains at $55.0 million, the balance as of March 31, 2014.
31
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us or our properties. See Note 13 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Commitments and Contingencies – Litigation”.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes in the risk factors described in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
32
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
Exhibit Number | Description of Exhibit | |
3.1 | Form of Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Chatham Lodging Trust(1) | |
3.2 | Articles Supplementary(2) | |
3.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Chatham Lodging Trust(2) | |
10.1 | Sales Agreement, dated January 31, 2014, by and among Chatham Lodging Trust, Chatham Lodging L.P. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.(3) | |
10.2 | Share Award Agreement, dated January 31, 2014, between Chatham Lodging Trust and Jeffrey H. Fisher | |
10.3 | Share Award Agreement, dated January 31, 2014, between Chatham Lodging Trust and Dennis M. Craven | |
10.4 | Share Award Agreement, dated January 31, 2014, between Chatham Lodging Trust and Peter Willis | |
10.5 | Share Award Agreement, dated January 31, 2014, between Chatham Lodging Trust and Jeffrey H. Fisher (Performance-Based Share Awards) | |
10.6 | Share Award Agreement, dated January 31, 2014, between Chatham Lodging Trust and Dennis Craven (Performance-Based Share Awards) | |
10.7 | Share Award Agreement, dated January 31, 2014, between Chatham Lodging Trust and Peter Willis (Performance-Based Share Awards) | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the SEC on February 12, 2010 (File No. 333-162889). |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 13, 2013. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 31, 2014. |
33
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST | |||
Dated: | May 9, 2014 | /s/ DENNIS M. CRAVEN | |
Dennis M. Craven | |||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
34