Clipper Realty Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ☒ |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-38010
CLIPPER REALTY INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland |
|
47-4579660 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
4611 12TH Avenue, Suite 1L
Brooklyn, New York 11219
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(718) 438-2804
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
||
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: |
None |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer |
|
Accelerated filer |
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) ☒ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
Emerging growth company ☒ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of July 27, 2017, there were 17,812,755 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | |
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
4 |
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
4 |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 2017 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2016 |
4 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016 (UNAUDITED) |
5 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 (UNAUDITED) |
6 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016 (UNAUDITED) |
7 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) |
8 |
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
21 |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
30 |
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
30 |
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION |
31 |
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
31 |
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS |
31 |
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
32 |
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE |
32 |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS |
32 |
SIGNATURES |
33 |
PART I. – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Clipper Realty Inc. (the “Company”), including, without limitation, statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” regarding the Company’s financial position, business strategy and the plans, objectives, expectations, or assumptions of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “continue,” “potential,” “plan,” “goal” or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which are generally not historical in nature. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in such statements. These risks, contingencies and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
● |
market and economic conditions affecting occupancy levels, rental rates, the overall market value of our properties, our access to capital and the cost of capital and our ability to refinance indebtedness; |
● |
economic or regulatory developments in New York City; |
● |
the single government tenant in our commercial buildings may suffer financial difficulty; |
● |
our ability to control operating costs to the degree anticipated; |
● |
the risk of damage to our properties, including from severe weather, natural disasters, climate change, and terrorist attacks; |
● |
risks related to financing, cost overruns, and fluctuations in occupancy rates and rents resulting from development or redevelopment activities and the risk that we may not be able to pursue or complete development or redevelopment activities or that such development or redevelopment activities may not be profitable; |
● |
concessions or significant capital expenditures that may be required to attract and retain tenants; |
● |
the relative illiquidity of real estate investments; |
● |
competition affecting our ability to engage in investment and development opportunities or attract or retain tenants; |
● |
unknown or contingent liabilities in properties acquired in formative and future transactions; |
● |
changes in rent stabilization regulations or claims by tenants in rent-stabilized units that their rents exceed specified maximum amounts under current regulations; |
● |
the possible effects of departure of key personnel in our management team on our investment opportunities and relationships with lenders and prospective business partners; |
● |
conflicts of interest faced by members of management relating to the acquisition of assets and the development of properties, which may not be resolved in our favor; |
● |
a transfer of a controlling interest in any of our properties may obligate us to pay transfer tax based on the fair market value of the real property transferred; and |
● |
other risks and risk factors or uncertainties identified from time to time in our filings with the SEC. |
Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Reference is made to a more complete discussion of forward-looking statements and applicable risks contained under the captions “Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the SEC on March 31, 2017. Clipper Realty Inc. undertakes no obligation to update or revise any of its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Clipper Realty Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except for share data)
June 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||
(unaudited) |
||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investment in real estate |
||||||||
Land and improvements |
$ | 433,666 | $ | 433,666 | ||||
Building and improvements |
442,395 | 435,318 | ||||||
Tenant improvements |
3,001 | 2,986 | ||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
9,601 | 9,281 | ||||||
Real estate under development |
89,313 | — | ||||||
Total Investment in real estate |
977,976 | 881,251 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(65,712 | ) | (58,174 | ) | ||||
Investment in real estate, net |
912,264 | 823,077 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
68,484 | 37,547 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
13,395 | 11,105 | ||||||
Tenant and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,109 and $2,768, respectively |
4,571 | 4,485 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
3,669 | 3,825 | ||||||
Deferred costs and intangible assets, net |
12,682 | 13,953 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
12,330 | 11,216 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 1,027,395 | $ | 905,208 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Notes payable, net of unamortized loan costs of $12,393 and $10,134, respectively |
810,519 | 754,459 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
6,018 | 8,982 | ||||||
Security deposits |
6,562 | 6,248 | ||||||
Below-market leases, net |
5,968 | 6,862 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
2,982 | 2,441 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
$ | 832,049 | $ | 778,992 | ||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 12.5% Series A Cumulative Non-Voting Preferred Stock; $137,500 liquidation preference, 0 and 132 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
— | — | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 17,812,755 and 11,422,606, respectively, issued and outstanding |
178 | 114 | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital |
91,579 | 46,671 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(12,909 | ) | (8,584 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity |
78,848 | 38,201 | ||||||
Non-controlling interests |
116,498 | 88,015 | ||||||
TOTAL EQUITY |
$ | 195,346 | $ | 126,216 | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
$ | 1,027,395 | $ | 905,208 |
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
Clipper Realty Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2017 |
2016 |
2017 |
2016 |
|||||||||||||
REVENUES |
||||||||||||||||
Residential rental income |
$ | 18,079 | $ | 15,911 | $ | 36,116 | $ | 31,738 | ||||||||
Commercial income |
5,471 | 4,520 | 10,942 | 8,959 | ||||||||||||
Tenant recoveries |
1,017 | 1,070 | 2,061 | 1,883 | ||||||||||||
Garage and other income |
791 | 704 | 1,502 | 1,351 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL REVENUES |
25,358 | 22,205 | 50,621 | 43,931 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
6,564 | 6,142 | 13,669 | 12,684 | ||||||||||||
Real estate taxes and insurance |
4,817 | 4,089 | 9,469 | 8,140 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
2,588 | 2,090 | 4,784 | 3,922 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition costs |
6 | 401 | 27 | 407 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,063 | 3,348 | 7,998 | 6,638 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES |
18,038 | 16,070 | 35,947 | 31,791 | ||||||||||||
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS |
7,320 | 6,135 | 14,674 | 12,140 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(8,931 | ) | (9,652 | ) | (17,583 | ) | (18,863 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss |
(1,611 | ) | (3,517 | ) | (2,909 | ) | (6,723 | ) | ||||||||
Less: |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests |
965 | 2,452 | 1,798 | 4,688 | ||||||||||||
Dividends attributable to preferred shares |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | (8 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (650 | ) | $ | (1,069 | ) | $ | (1,119 | ) | $ | (2,042 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted loss per share |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) |
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
Clipper Realty Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(In thousands, except for share data)
(Unaudited)
Number of preferred |
Number of |
Common |
Additional |
Accumulated |
Total |
Non- |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2016 |
132 | 11,422,606 | $ | 114 | $ | 46,671 | $ | (8,584 | ) | $ | 38,201 | $ | 88,015 | $ | 126,216 | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
— | 6,390,149 | 64 | 78,747 | — | 78,811 | — | 78,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from redemption of preferred shares |
(132 | ) | — | — | (145 | ) | — | (145 | ) | — | (145 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of LTIP grants |
— | — | — | — | — | — | 1,429 | 1,429 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends and distributions |
— | — | — | — | (3,214 | ) | (3,214 | ) | (4,842 | ) | (8,056 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
— | — | — | — | (1,111 | ) | (1,111 | ) | (1,798 | ) | (2,909 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reallocation of noncontrolling interest |
— | — | — | (33,694 | ) | — | (33,694 | ) | 33,694 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2017 |
— | 17,812,755 | $ | 178 | $ | 91,579 | $ | (12,909 | ) | $ | 78,848 | $ | 116,498 | $ | 195,346 |
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
Clipper Realty Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2017 |
2016 |
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (2,909 | ) | $ | (6,723 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
7,538 | 6,197 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
1,442 | 3,095 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred costs and intangible assets |
1,243 | 1,110 | ||||||
Amortization of above and below market leases |
(866 | ) | (919 | ) | ||||
Deferred rent |
156 | (19 | ) | |||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,429 | 1,112 | ||||||
Change in fair value of interest rate caps |
329 | 9 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Restricted cash |
(2,290 | ) | 77 | |||||
Accounts and other receivables |
(86 | ) | (1,785 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses, other assets and deferred costs |
(293 | ) | 721 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(2,220 | ) | 771 | |||||
Security deposits |
314 | 914 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
541 | 431 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
4,328 | 4,991 | ||||||
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Additions to land, buildings, and improvements |
(8,578 | ) | (8,539 | ) | ||||
Acquisition deposit |
(2,144 | ) | — | |||||
Cash paid in connection with acquisition of real estate |
(87,586 | ) | (102,845 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(98,308 | ) | (111,384 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Proceeds and costs from sale of common stock |
78,811 | (438 | ) | |||||
Redemption / sale of preferred stock |
(145 | ) | 132 | |||||
Payments of notes payable |
(681 | ) | (55,354 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from notes payable |
59,000 | 149,500 | ||||||
Dividends and distributions |
(8,056 | ) | (4,969 | ) | ||||
Loan costs and other |
(4,012 | ) | (3,751 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
124,917 | 85,120 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
30,937 | (21,273 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period |
37,547 | 125,332 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period |
$ | 68,484 | $ | 104,059 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest of $180 in 2017 |
$ | 15,771 | $ | 16,448 | ||||
Other non-cash items capitalized to real estate under development | $ | 561 | $ | — |
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
Clipper Realty Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands except share data)
1. Organization
Clipper Realty Inc. (the “Company” or “We”) was organized in the state of Maryland on July 7, 2015. On August 3, 2015, we completed certain formation transactions and the sale of shares of common stock in a private offering. We contributed the net proceeds of the private offering to Clipper Realty L.P., our operating partnership subsidiary (the “Operating Partnership”), in exchange for units in the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership in turn contributed such net proceeds to the limited liability companies (“LLC’s”) that comprised the predecessor of the Company (the “Predecessor”) in exchange for class A LLC units in such LLC’s and became the managing member of such LLC’s. The owners of the LLC’s exchanged their interests for class B LLC units and an equal number of special, non-economic, voting stock in the Company. The class B LLC units, together with the special voting shares, are convertible into common shares of the Company on a one-for-one basis and are entitled to distributions.
On February 9, 2017, the Company priced an initial public offering of 6,390,149 primary shares of its common stock (including the exercise of the over-allotment option, which closed on March 10, 2017) at a price of $13.50 per share (the “IPO”). The net proceeds of the IPO were approximately $78.8 million. We contributed the proceeds of the IPO to Clipper Realty L.P., our Operating Partnership, in exchange for units in the Operating Partnership.
On May 9, 2017, the Company completed the purchase of 107 Columbia Heights, a 161-unit apartment community located in Brooklyn Heights, New York, for $87.5 million, financed with a $59 million secured mortgage loan.
As of June 30, 2017, the properties owned by the Company consist of the following (collectively, the “Properties”):
• |
Tribeca House properties in Manhattan, comprising two buildings, one with 21 stories and one with 12 stories, containing residential and retail space with an aggregate of approximately 480,000 square feet of residential rental Gross Leasable Area (“GLA”) and 77,236 square feet of rental retail and parking GLA; |
• |
Flatbush Gardens in Brooklyn, comprised of a 59-building multi-family housing complex with 2,496 rentable units; |
• |
141 Livingston Street in Brooklyn, a 15-story office building with approximately 216,073 square feet of GLA; |
• |
250 Livingston Street in Brooklyn, a 12-story office and residential building with approximately 294,378 square feet of GLA; |
• |
Aspen property in Manhattan, a seven-story building containing residential and retail space with approximately 166,000 square feet of residential rental GLA and approximately 21,000 square feet of rental retail GLA; and | |
• | 107 Columbia Heights in Brooklyn Heights (“107 Columbia Heights”), currently a ten-story 161-unit building containing 154,058 square feet of residential space. |
The operations of Clipper Realty, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries are carried on primarily through the Operating Partnership. The Company has elected to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership is the sole managing member of the LLC’s that comprised the Predecessor.
At June 30, 2017, the Company’s interest, through the Operating Partnership, in the LLC’s that own the properties generally entitles it to 40.4% of the aggregate cash distributions from, and the profits and losses of, the LLC’s.
As further discussed in Note 3, upon adoption of ASU 2015-02, the Company determined that the Operating Partnership and the LLC’s are variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and that the Company was the primary beneficiary. The assets and liabilities of these VIEs represented substantially all of the Company’s assets and liabilities.
2. Sale of Common Stock, Formation Transactions and Preferred Stock Redemption
As discussed in Note 1, on February 9 and March 10, 2017, the Company sold an aggregate of 6,390,149 primary shares of common stock to investors in a public offering at $13.50 per share. The proceeds, net of offering costs, were approximately $78,811.
On August 3, 2015, the Company sold 10,666,667 shares of common stock to private investors at a price of $13.50 per share. The proceeds, net of offering costs, were approximately $130,199.
The Company contributed the net proceeds of the common stock offerings to the Operating Partnership in exchange for units in the Operating Partnership as described in Note 1.
On June 21, 2017, the Company redeemed its preferred stock with a payment of $145.
3. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The effect of all intercompany balances has been eliminated. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all entities in which the Company have a controlling interest. The ownership interests of other investors in these entities are recorded as non-controlling interest.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of commitments and contingencies at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates.
Investment in Real Estate
Real estate assets held for investment are carried at historical cost and consist of land, buildings and improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment. Expenditures for ordinary repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for improvements, renovations, and replacements of real estate assets are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives if the expenditures qualify as betterment or the life of the related asset will be substantially extended beyond the original life expectancy.
Upon acquisition of real estate, the Company assesses the fair values of acquired tangible and intangible assets including land, buildings, tenant improvements, above and below-market leases, in-place leases and any other identified intangible assets and assumed liabilities. The Company allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values. In estimating fair value of tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Company assesses and considers fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs, net of depreciation, and available market information. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.
The Company records acquired above-market and below-market lease values initially based on the present value, using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired based on the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed renewal options for the below-market leases. Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values (if any) that are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with the respective tenant. Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commission, legal and other related expenses.
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. A property’s value is impaired if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, a write-down is recorded and measured by the amount of the difference between the carrying value of the asset and the fair value of the asset. Management of the Company does not believe that any of its properties within the portfolio are impaired as of June 30, 2017.
For long-lived assets to be disposed of, impairment losses are recognized when the fair value of the assets less estimated cost to sell is less than the carrying value of the assets. Properties classified as real estate held for sale generally represent properties that are actively marketed or contracted for sale with closing expected to occur within the next twelve months. Real estate held for sale is carried at the lower of cost, net of accumulated depreciation, or fair value less cost to sell, determined on an asset-by-asset basis. Expenditures for ordinary repair and maintenance costs on held for sale properties are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for improvements, renovations, and replacements related to held-for-sale properties are capitalized at cost. Depreciation is not recorded on real estate held for sale.
If a tenant vacates its space prior to the contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balances of the related intangibles are written off. The tenant improvements and origination costs are amortized to expense over the remaining life of the lease (or charged against earnings if the lease is terminated prior to its contractual expiration date).
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
Building and improvements (years) |
10 |
– |
44 |
Tenant improvements |
Shorter of useful life or lease term | ||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment (years) |
3 |
– |
15 |
The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases. The value of in-place leases is amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash on hand and in banks plus all short-term investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. The Company maintains some of its cash in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed the federally insured limit. No losses have been experienced related to such accounts.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash generally consists of escrows for future real estate taxes and insurance expenditures, repairs and capital improvements and security deposits.
Tenant and Other Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Tenant and other receivables are comprised of amounts due for monthly rents and other charges. The Company periodically performs a detailed review of amounts due from tenants to determine if accounts receivable balances are impaired based on factors affecting the collectability of those balances. If a tenant fails to make contractual payments beyond any allowance, the Company may recognize additional bad debt expense in future periods.
Deferred Costs
Deferred lease costs consist of fees incurred to initiate and renew operating leases. Lease costs are being amortized using the straight-line method over the terms of the respective leases.
Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal and other third-party costs associated with obtaining financing. These costs are amortized over the term of the financing and are recorded in interest expense in the consolidated financial statements. Unamortized deferred financing costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions which do not close are expensed in the period the financing transaction is terminated.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income adjusted for changes in unrealized gains and losses, reported in equity, for financial instruments required to be reported at fair value under GAAP. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not own any financial instruments for which the change in value was not reported in net income accordingly and its comprehensive income was its net income as presented in the consolidated statements of operations.
Revenue Recognition
Rental revenue for commercial leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Rental income attributable to residential leases and parking is recognized as earned, which is not materially different from the straight-line basis. Leases entered into by residents for apartment units are generally for one year terms, renewable upon consent of both parties on an annual or monthly basis. Deferred rents receivable represents the amount by which straight-line rental revenue exceeds rents currently billed in accordance with lease agreements.
Reimbursements for operating expenses due from tenants pursuant to their lease agreements are recognized as revenue in the period the applicable expenses are incurred. These costs generally include real estate taxes, utilities, insurance, common area maintenance costs and other recoverable costs.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation.” As such, all equity-based awards are reflected as compensation expense in the Company’s consolidated financial statements over their vesting period based on the fair value at the date of grant.
In April 2017, the Company granted 151,853 LTIP units with a weighted average grant date fair value of $10.96 per unit.
At June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, there were 653,338 and 501,485 LTIP units outstanding, respectively, with a weighted grant-date fair value of $12.95 and $13.50 per unit, respectively. As of June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, there was $3.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under share incentive plans. As of June 30, 2017, the weighted average period over which the unrecognized compensation expense will be recorded is approximately 2.2 years.
Income Taxes
The Company elected to be taxed and to operate in a manner that will allow it to qualify as a REIT under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2015. To qualify as a REIT, the Company is required to distribute dividends equal to at least 90% of the REIT taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and net capital gains) to its stockholders, and meet the various other requirements imposed by the Code relating to matters such as operating results, asset holdings, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership. Provided the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it is generally not subject to U.S. federal corporate-level income tax on the earnings distributed currently to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal and state income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates and any applicable alternative minimum tax. In addition, the Company may not be able to re-elect as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years. The entities comprising the Predecessor are limited liability companies and are treated as pass-through entities for income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal, state or local income or franchise taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
In accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 740, the Company believes that it has appropriate support for the income tax positions taken and, as such, does not have any uncertain tax positions that, if successfully challenged, could result in a material impact on its or the Predecessor’s financial position or results of operation. The prior three years’ income tax returns are subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service.
Fair Value Measurements
Refer to Note 9, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments”.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The FASB derivative and hedging guidance establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. As required by the FASB guidance, the Company records all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation.
Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecast transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative and the hedged item related to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings. The Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction. For derivatives not designated as hedges, changes in fair value would be recognized in earnings. As of June 30, 2017, the Company has no derivatives for which it applies hedge accounting.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding. As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company has unvested LTIP Units which provide for non-forfeitable rights to dividend equivalent payments. Accordingly, these unvested LTIP Units are considered participating securities and are included in the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share pursuant to the two-class method. The Company does not have dilutive securities as of June 30, 2017 or 2016.
The effect of the conversion of the 26,317 Class B LLC units outstanding is not reflected in the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share, as the effect would be anti-dilutive. The income (loss) allocable to such units is reflected as noncontrolling interests in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the periods indicated (unaudited):
(dollar in thousands, except per share amounts) |
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||
2017 |
2016 |
2017 |
2016 |
|||||||||||||
Numerator |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (650 | ) | $ | (1,069 | ) | $ | (1,119 | ) | $ | (2,042 | ) | ||||
Less: net loss attributable to participating securities |
(62 | ) | (15 | ) | (105 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | (712 | ) | $ | (1,084 | ) | $ | (1,224 | ) | $ | (2,098 | ) | ||||
Denominator |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
17,813 | 11,423 | 16,228 | 11,423 | ||||||||||||
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) |
Recently Issued Pronouncements
In May 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting. ASU 2017-09 clarifies Topic 718 such that an entity must apply modification accounting to changes in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award unless all of the following criteria are met:
1. |
The fair value of the modified award is the same as the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification. The standard indicates that if the modification does not affect any of the inputs to the valuation technique used to value the award, the entity is not required to estimate the value immediately before and after the modification. |
2. |
The vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the modification. |
3. |
The classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the modification. |
The amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of ASU 2017-05 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-05, Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20) to add guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets, including partial sales of real estate. Historically, U.S. GAAP contained several different accounting models to evaluate whether the transfer of certain assets qualified for sale treatment. ASU 2017-05 reduces the number of potential accounting models that might apply and clarifies which model does apply in various circumstances. ASU 2017-05 is effective for annual reporting periods after December 16, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The adoption of ASU 2017-05 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01 "Business Combinations – Clarifying the Definition of a Business." ASU 2017-01 clarifies that to be considered a business, the elements must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output. The new standard illustrates the circumstances under which real estate with in-place leases would be considered a business and provides guidance for the identification of assets and liabilities in purchase accounting. ASU 2017-01 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 207-01 in 2017. The new standard is expected to reduce the number of future real estate acquisitions that will be accounted for as business combinations and, therefore, reduce the amount of acquisition costs that will be expensed.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18 “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Restricted Cash”. The ASU requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The ASU does not provide a definition of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating when to adopt ASU No. 2016-18.
4. Acquisitions
On June 27, 2016, the Company acquired the Aspen property for $103,000.
The purchase price was allocated as follows:
Land |
$ | 49,139 | ||
Buildings |
42,753 | |||
Tenant improvements |
26 | |||
Site improvements |
91 | |||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
302 | |||
Above-market leases |
444 | |||
Below-market leases |
(783 | ) | ||
In-place leases |
1,093 | |||
Lease origination costs |
793 | |||
Real estate tax abatements |
9,142 | |||
Total |
$ | 103,000 |
We have prepared the following unaudited pro forma income statement information for the six months ended June 30, 2016, as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2016. The pro forma data is not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the acquisition had been consummated on January 1, 2016.
Six Months Ended |
||||
Revenue |
$ | 47,092 | ||
Total expenses |
(54,239 | ) | ||
Net loss |
$ | (7,147 | ) | |
Basic and diluted loss per share |
$ | (0.19 | ) |
On May 9, 2017, the Company purchased 107 Columbia Heights, in vacant condition, for $87.5 million. In connection with the acquisition and redevelopment of the property, the Company obtained acquisition and construction financing secured by mortgages on the property (see Note 7). The purchase price was preliminarily allocated 50% to land and 50% to building.
During the second quarter of 2017, the Company made a refundable deposit of approximately $2.1 million, in connection with a proposed acquisition of a residential property at 10 West 65th Street. The proposed acquisition is subject to certain conditions, including the seller’s success in acquiring a replacement property.
5. Deferred Costs and Intangible Assets
Deferred costs and intangible assets consist of the following:
June 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||
Deferred costs |
$ | 266 | $ | 266 | ||||
Above-market leases |
480 | 480 | ||||||
Lease origination costs |
3,092 | 3,092 | ||||||
In-place lease |
7,347 | 7,347 | ||||||
Real estate tax abatements |
12,571 | 12,571 | ||||||
Total deferred costs and intangible assets |
23,756 | 23,756 | ||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(11,074 | ) | (9,803 | ) | ||||
Total deferred costs and intangible assets, net |
$ | 12,682 | $ | 13,953 |
Amortization of lease origination costs and in-place lease intangible assets was $230 and $224 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $460 and $441 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization of real estate abatements of $392 and $331 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $783 and $669 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, is included in real estate taxes and insurance in the consolidated statements of operations. Amortization of above-market leases of $15 and $28 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, is included in commercial income in the consolidated statements of operations.
Deferred costs and intangible assets as of June 30, 2017, amortize in future years as follows:
2017 (Remainder) |
$ | 1,284 | ||
2018 |
1,284 | |||
2019 |
1,056 | |||
2020 |
812 | |||
2021 |
812 | |||
Thereafter |
7,434 | |||
Total |
$ | 12,682 |
6. Below-Market Lease Intangibles
The Company’s below-market lease intangibles liabilities are as follows:
June 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||
Below-market leases |
$ | 23,178 | $ | 23,178 | ||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(17,210 | ) | (16,316 | ) | ||||
$ | 5,968 | $ | 6,862 |
Rental income includes amortization of below-market leases of $447 and $489 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $894 and $919 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The balance of below-market leases as of June 30, 2017, amortize in future years as follows:
2017 (Remainder) |
$ | 893 | ||
2018 |
1,787 | |||
2019 |
1,269 | |||
2020 |
489 | |||
2021 |
488 | |||
Thereafter |
1,042 | |||
Total |
$ | 5,968 |
7. Notes Payable
The first mortgages and mezzanine notes payable collateralized by the respective properties, or the Company’s interest in the entities that own the properties and assignment of leases, were as follows:
Property |
Maturity |
Interest Rate |
June 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||||
Flatbush Gardens, Brooklyn, NY (a) |
10/1/2024 |
3.88 | % | $ | 149,779 | $ | 150,000 | ||||||
Flatbush Gardens, Brooklyn, NY(b) |
10/1/2024 |
3.88 | % | 19,971 | 20,000 | ||||||||
250 Livingston Street, Brooklyn, NY(c) |
5/6/2023 |
4.00 | % | 34,662 | 35,093 | ||||||||
141 Livingston Street, Brooklyn, NY(d) |
6/1/2028 |
3.875 | % | 79,500 | 79,500 | ||||||||
Tribeca House properties, NY(e) |
11/9/2018 |
LIBOR + 3.75 |
% | 410,000 | 410,000 | ||||||||
Aspen property, NY(f) |
7/1/2028 |
3.68 | % | 70,000 | 70,000 | ||||||||
107 Columbia Heights property, NY (g) |
5/9/2020 |
LIBOR + 3.85 |
% | 59,000 | — | ||||||||
$ | 822,912 | $ | 764,593 | ||||||||||
Unamortized debt issuance costs |
(12,393 | ) | (10,134 | ) | |||||||||
Total debt, net of debt issuance costs |
$ | 810,519 | $ | 754,459 |
(a) The $150,000 mortgage note agreement with New York Community Bank (“NYCB”) matures on October 1, 2024 and bears interest at a fixed-rate of interest of 3.88%. The note requires interest-only payments through April 2017 and monthly principal and interest payments thereafter based on a 30-year amortization.
(b) The additional $20,000 note with NYCB matures coterminous with the $150,000 mortgage, and bears interest at 3.88% through September 2019 and thereafter at prime plus 2.75%, subject to an option to fix the rate. The note requires interest-only payments through April 2017, monthly principal and interest payments of $94 from May 2017 through September 2019 based on a 30-year amortization schedule and principal and interest payments thereafter based on the remaining period of the initial 30-year amortization schedule.
(c) The mortgage note agreement with Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. for $37,500 requires monthly principal and interest payments of $179, bears interest at 4.00% and matures on May 6, 2023.
(d) On May 11, 2016, the Company repaid the $55,000 loan secured by the property at 141 Livingston Street, Brooklyn, New York, from the proceeds of a $79,500 loan from NYCB. The NYCB loan matures on June 1, 2028, and bears interest at 3.875%. The note requires interest-only payments through June 2017, and monthly principal and interest payments of $374 from July 2017 through June 2028 based on a 30-year amortization schedule.
(e) On November 9, 2016, the Company repaid the $360,000 of mortgage notes and the $100,000 mezzanine notes assumed in connection with the acquisition of the Tribeca House properties, utilizing the proceeds from a $410,000 loan package with Deutsche Bank and SL Green Finance, and cash on hand. The loan package bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 3.75% (equivalent to 5.0% as of June 30, 2017), matures on November 9, 2018 and is subject to three one-year extension options.
(f) On June 27, 2016, the Company entered into a $70,000 mortgage note agreement with Capital One Multifamily Finance LLC, related to the Aspen property acquisition. The note matures on July 1, 2028 and bears interest at 3.68%. The note requires interest-only payments through July 2017, and monthly principal and interest payments of $321 from August 2017 through July 2028 based on a 30-year amortization schedule.
(g) On May 9, 2017, the Company entered into a $59,000 mortgage note agreement with a unit of Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. The Company also entered into a construction loan secured by the building with the same lender that will provide up to $14,700 for eligible capital improvements and carrying costs. The notes mature on May 9, 2020, are subject to two one-year extensions, and bear interest at one-month LIBOR plus 3.85% (equivalent to 5.1% as of June 30, 2017).
The following table summarizes principal payment requirements under terms as of June 30, 2017:
2017 (Remainder) |
$ | 3,809 | ||
2018 |
416,731 | |||
2019 |
6,678 | |||
2020 |
64,332 | |||
2021 |
5,560 | |||
Thereafter |
325,802 | |||
Total |
$ | 822,912 |
8. Rental Income under Operating Leases
The Company’s commercial properties are leased to commercial tenants under operating leases with fixed terms of varying lengths. As of June 30, 2017, the minimum future cash rents receivable (excluding tenant reimbursements for operating expenses) under non-cancelable operating leases for the commercial tenants in each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
2017 (Remainder) |
$ | 10,770 | ||
2018 |
21,648 | |||
2019 |
16,813 | |||
2020 |
10,247 | |||
2021 |
4,749 | |||
Thereafter |
24,025 | |||
Total |
$ | 88,252 |
The Company has commercial leases with the City of New York that comprised approximately 20% of total revenue for each of the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. In December 2016, the City of New York executed a new lease for a portion of the Company’s property at 250 Livingston Street that terminates in August 2020, coterminous with the lease for the remainder of the office space at the property.
9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
GAAP requires the measurement of certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, GAAP requires the measure of other financial instruments and balances at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired real estate and long-lived assets). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities; | ||
• |
Level 2: quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and |
• |
Level 3: prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available that requires inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
When available, the Company utilizes quoted market prices from an independent third-party source to determine fair value and classifies such items in Level 1 or Level 2. In instances where the market for a financial instrument is not active, regardless of the availability of a nonbinding quoted market price, observable inputs might not be relevant and could require the Company to make a significant adjustment to derive a fair value measurement. Additionally, in an inactive market, a market price quoted from an independent third party may rely more on models with inputs based on information available only to that independent third party. When the Company determines the market for a financial instrument owned by the Company to be illiquid or when market transactions for similar instruments do not appear orderly, the Company uses several valuation sources (including internal valuations, discounted cash flow analysis and quoted market prices) and establishes a fair value by assigning weights to the various valuation sources.
Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these estimated fair values. In this regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
The financial assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses, including interest rate caps, and mortgages. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, and accounts payable and accrued expenses reported in the consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of mortgages, which is classified as Level 2, is estimated by discounting the contractual cash flows of each debt instrument to their present value using adjusted market interest rates.
The carrying amount and fair value of the mortgage notes payable were as follows:
June 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||
(unaudited) |
||||||||
Carrying amount (excluding unamortized debt issuance costs) |
$ | 822,912 | $ | 764,593 | ||||
Fair value |
811,863 | 749,324 |
The Company purchased interest rate caps in connection with the mortgage loans on November 9, 2016, for the Tribeca House property and May 10, 2017, for the 107 Columbia Heights acquisition, that expire coterminous with the related debt as follows:
Notional Amount |
Related Property Loans |
Type of Instrument |
Maturity Date |
Strike Rate |
Estimated Fair Market Value at June 30, 2017 |
Estimated Fair Market Value at December 31, 2016 |
|||||||||||||
$410,000 |
Tribeca House |
Interest rate cap |
December 31, 2018 |
2.0 | % | $ | 80 | $ | 409 | ||||||||||
$73,700 |
107 Columbia Heights |
Interest rate cap |
May 3, 2020 |
3.0 | % | $ | 70 |
|
NA | ||||||||||
Total fair value of derivative instruments included in prepaid and other assets |
$ | 150 | $ | 409 |
Their fair value, which is classified as Level 2, is estimated using market inputs and credit valuation inputs. These instruments were not designated as hedges and accordingly the change in fair value for the Tribeca House instrument is recognized in earnings and, for the 107 Columbia Heights instrument, in real estate under development. As a result, the change in fair value for the Tribeca House instrument of $192 and $0 is included in interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $329 and $9 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The change in fair value of $63 for the 107 Columbia Heights instrument for the three months ended June 30, 2017, is included in real estate under development.
Disclosures about fair value of financial instruments were based on pertinent information available as of June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016. Although the Company is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the reasonable fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since that date and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal
On July 3, 2017, the New York Supreme Court (the “Court”) ruled in favor of 41 present or former tenants of apartment units at the Company’s buildings located at 50 Murray Street and 53 Park Place in Manhattan, New York, who brought an action against the Company alleging that they were subject to applicable rent stabilization laws with the result that rental payments charged by the Company exceeded amounts permitted under these laws because the buildings were receiving certain tax abatements under Real Property Tax Law 421-g. The Court also awarded the plaintiffs, their attorney’s fees and costs. The Court declared that the plaintiff-tenants were subject to rent stabilization requirements and referred the matter to a special referee to determine the amount of rent over-charges, if any. Two other cases have resulted in similar decisions. The Company believes that these court decisions are incorrect and conflict with other recent court decisions that directly uphold the Company’s position. On July 18, 2017, the Court stayed the above decision, and the Company intends to expeditiously appeal the Court’s decision to the Appellate Division, First Department. Due to the inherent uncertainty and unpredictability of litigation, we cannot determine at this time with any specificity the Company’s potential liability if the Court’s decision is upheld.
In addition to the above, the Company is subject to certain legal proceedings and claims arising in connection with its business. Management believes, based in part upon consultation with legal counsel, that the ultimate resolution of all such claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
Commitments
The Company is obligated to provide parking availability through August 2020 under a lease with a tenant at the 250 Livingston Street property; the current cost to the Company is approximately $240 per year.
Concentrations
The Company’s properties are located in the Boroughs of Manhattan and Brooklyn in New York City, which exposes the Company to greater economic risks than if it owned a more geographically dispersed portfolio. For each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, commercial properties accounted for approximately 26%, and residential properties accounted for approximately 74%, of total revenue.
11. Related-Party Transactions
Included in general and administrative expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, are office and overhead expenses of approximately $134 and $232, respectively, pertaining to a related company.
12. Segment Reporting
The Company has classified its reporting segments into commercial and residential rental properties. The commercial reporting segment includes the 141 Livingston Street property and portions of the 250 Livingston Street, Tribeca House, and Aspen properties. The residential reporting segment includes the Flatbush Gardens property, the 107 Columbia Heights property and portions of the 250 Livingston Street, Tribeca House and Aspen properties.
The Company’s income from operations by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
Three months ended June 30, 2017 |
Commercial |
Residential |
Total |
|||||||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 5,471 | $ | 18,079 | $ | 23,550 | ||||||
Tenant recoveries |
1,017 | — | 1,017 | |||||||||
Garage and other revenue income |
215 | 576 | 791 | |||||||||
Total revenues |
6,703 | 18,655 | 25,358 | |||||||||
Property operating expenses |
1,026 | 5,538 | 6,564 | |||||||||
Real estate taxes and insurance |
1,066 | 3,751 | 4,817 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
208 | 2,380 | 2,588 | |||||||||
Acquisition costs |
— | 6 | 6 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
835 | 3,228 | 4,063 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
3,135 | 14,903 | 18,038 | |||||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 3,568 | $ | 3,752 | $ | 7,320 |
Three months ended June 30, 2016 |
Commercial |
Residential |
Total |
|||||||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 4,520 | $ | 15,911 | $ | 20,431 | ||||||
Tenant recoveries |
1,070 | — | 1,070 | |||||||||
Garage and other revenue income |
243 | 461 | 704 | |||||||||
Total revenues |
5,833 | 16,372 | 22,205 | |||||||||
Property operating expenses |
936 | 5,206 | 6,142 | |||||||||
Real estate taxes and insurance |
990 | 3,099 | 4,089 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
173 | 1,917 | 2,090 | |||||||||
Acquisition costs |
— | 401 | 401 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
648 | 2,700 | 3,348 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
2,747 | 13,323 | 16,070 | |||||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 3,086 | $ | 3,049 | $ | 6,135 |
Six months ended June 30, 2017 |
Commercial |
Residential |
Total |
|||||||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 10,942 | $ | 36,116 | $ | 47,058 | ||||||
Tenant recoveries |
2,061 | — | 2,061 | |||||||||
Garage and other revenue income |
427 | 1,075 | 1,502 | |||||||||
Total revenues |
13,430 | 37,191 | 50,621 | |||||||||
Property operating expenses |
2,107 | 11,562 | 13,669 | |||||||||
Real estate taxes and insurance |
2,123 | 7,346 | 9,469 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
396 | 4,388 | 4,784 | |||||||||
Acquisition costs |
— | 27 | 27 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,603 | 6,395 | 7,998 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
6,229 | 29,718 | 35,947 | |||||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 7,201 | $ | 7,473 | $ | 14,674 |
Six months ended June 30, 2016 |
Commercial |
Residential |
Total |
|||||||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 8,959 | $ | 31,738 | $ | 40,697 | ||||||
Tenant recoveries |
1,883 | — | 1,883 | |||||||||
Garage and other revenue income |
789 | 562 | 1,351 | |||||||||
Total revenues |
11,631 | 32,300 | 43,931 | |||||||||
Property operating expenses |
1,895 | 10,789 | 12,684 | |||||||||
Real estate taxes and insurance |
1,956 | 6,184 | 8,140 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
330 | 3,592 | 3,922 | |||||||||
Acquisition costs |
— | 407 | 407 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,284 | 5,354 | 6,638 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
5,465 | 26,326 | 31,791 | |||||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 6,166 | $ | 5,974 | $ | 12,140 |
The Company’s total assets by segment are as follows, as of:
Commercial |
Residential |
Total |
||||||||||
June 30, 2017 |
$ | 225,629 | $ | 801,766 | $ | 1,027,395 | ||||||
December 31, 2016 |
225,608 | 679,600 | 905,208 |
The Company’s interest expense by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
Commercial |
Residential |
Total |
||||||||||
Three months ended June 30: |
||||||||||||
2017 |
$ | 1,942 | $ | 6,989 | $ | 8,931 | ||||||
2016 |
1,879 | 7,773 | 9,652 | |||||||||
Six months ended June 30: |
||||||||||||
2017 |
$ | 3,823 | $ | 13,760 | $ | 17,583 | ||||||
2016 |
3,673 | 15,190 | 18,863 |
The Company’s capital expenditures by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
Commercial |
Residential |
Total |
||||||||||
Three months ended June 30: |
||||||||||||
2017 |
$ | 2,002 | $ | 4,035 | $ | 6,037 | ||||||
2016 |
369 | 4,812 | 5,181 | |||||||||
Six months ended June 30: |
||||||||||||
2017 |
$ | 3,013 | $ | 6,126 | $ | 9,139 | ||||||
2016 |
399 | 8,140 | 8,539 |
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the more detailed information set forth under the captions “Selected Historical Financial Data,” “Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” and in our financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The financial statements for periods and as of dates prior to the formation transactions represent consolidated historical financials of the Predecessor.
Overview of Our Company
We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate company that acquires, owns, manages, operates and repositions multi-family residential and commercial properties in the New York metropolitan area, with an initial portfolio in Manhattan and Brooklyn. Our primary focus is to own, manage and operate our portfolio and to acquire and reposition additional multi-family residential and commercial properties in the New York metropolitan area. The Company has been organized and operates in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the U.S. federal income tax law and elected to be treated as a REIT commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2015.
Clipper Realty was incorporated on July 7, 2015. On August 3, 2015, we closed a private offering of shares of our common stock, in which we raised net proceeds of approximately $130.2 million. In connection with the private offering, we consummated a series of investment and other formation transactions that were designed, among other things, to enable us to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
On February 9, 2017, and March 10, 2017, the Company sold 6,390,149 primary shares of common stock to investors in a public offering at $13.50 per share (the “IPO”). The proceeds, net of offering costs, were approximately $78,811. The Company contributed the IPO proceeds to the Operating Partnership in exchange for units in the Operating Partnership.
On May 9, 2017, the Company completed the purchase of 107 Columbia Heights, a 161-unit apartment community located in Brooklyn Heights, New York, for $87.5 million.
As of June 30, 2017, the Company owns:
• |
two neighboring residential/retail rental properties at 50 Murray Street and 53 Park Place in the Tribeca neighborhood of Manhattan; |
• |
one residential property complex in the East Flatbush neighborhood of Brooklyn consisting of 59 buildings; |
• |
two primarily commercial properties in Downtown Brooklyn (one of which includes 36 residential apartment units); |
• |
one residential/retail rental property at 1955 1st Avenue in Manhattan; and |
|
• |
one vacant residential property at 107 Columbia Heights in Brooklyn Heights. |
These properties are located in the most densely populated major city in the United States, each with immediate access to mass transportation.
The operations of Clipper Realty, Inc., and its consolidated subsidiaries are carried on primarily through the Operating Partnership. The Company has elected to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership is the sole managing member of the LLC’s that comprised the Predecessor.
At June 30, 2017, the Company’s interest, through the Operating Partnership, in the LLC’s that own the properties generally entitles it to 40.4% of the aggregate cash distributions from, and the profits and losses of, the LLC’s.
Internal Controls and Procedures
We have had limited accounting personnel and systems to adequately execute accounting processes and limited other supervisory resources with which to address internal controls over financial reporting. As such, our internal controls may not be sufficient to ensure that (1) all transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and (2) the design and execution of our controls has consistently resulted in effective review of our financial statements and supervision by individuals with financial reporting oversight roles.
We are not currently required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and are, therefore, not required to make a formal assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for that purpose. As of December 31, 2017, we will be required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which will require our management to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. To comply with the requirements of being a public company, we may need to implement additional financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures and hire additional accounting and finance staff.
Further, our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting for as long as we are an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act. Once it is required to do so, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed.
Results of Operations
Our focus throughout 2016 and the first half of 2017 has been to manage our properties to optimize revenue and control costs at each property while continuing to renovate and reposition certain properties. The discussions below will identify the specific properties contributing to the changes in the results of operations. The discussion will focus on the properties the Company held for the full period in each comparison.
Income Statement for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands)
2017 |
Less: Aspen |
2017 excluding Aspen |
2016 |
Less: Aspen |
2016 excluding Aspen |
Increase (decrease) |
% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential rental revenue |
$ | 18,079 | $ | 1,381 | $ | 16,698 | $ | 15,911 | $ | 66 | $ | 15,845 | $ | 853 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial rental revenue |
5,471 | 362 | 5,109 | 4,520 | 15 | 4,505 | 604 | 13.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenant recoveries |
1,017 | 1 | 1,016 | 1,070 | - | 1,070 | (54 | ) | (5.1 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Garage and other income |
791 | 5 | 786 | 704 | - | 704 | 82 | 11.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
25,358 | 1,749 | 23,609 | 22,205 | 81 | 22,124 | 1,485 | 6.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
6,564 | 272 | 6,292 | 6,142 | 9 | 6,133 | 159 | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate taxes and insurance |
4,817 | 152 | 4,665 | 4,089 | 11 | 4,078 | 587 | 14.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
2,588 | 117 | 2,471 | 2,090 | 3 | 2,087 | 384 | 18.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition costs |
6 | - | 6 | 401 | 399 | 2 | 4 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,063 | 310 | 3,753 | 3,348 | 19 | 3,329 | 424 | 12.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
18,038 | 851 | 17,187 | 16,070 | 441 | 15,629 | 1,557 | 10.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
7,320 | 898 | 6,422 | 6,135 | (360 | ) | 6,495 | (73 | ) | (1.1 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(8,931 | ) | (701 | ) | (8,230 | ) | (9,652 | ) | (2 | ) | (9,650 | ) | 1,420 | (14.7 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (1,611 | ) | $ | 197 | $ | (1,808 | ) | $ | (3,517 | ) | $ | (362 | ) | $ | (3,155 | ) | $ | 1,347 | (42.7 | )% |
Revenue. Residential rental revenue, excluding Aspen, increased from $15,845 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, to $16,698 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, due to higher revenues on new leases and routine annual increases on renewed rentals primarily at the Flatbush Gardens property complex and higher revenues on new leases at Tribeca House. Base rent per square foot increased at the Flatbush Gardens property from $20.83 (96.5% occupancy) at June 30, 2016 to $21.59 (97.0% leased occupancy) at June 30, 2017.
Commercial rental revenue, excluding Aspen, increased from $4,505 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, to $5,109 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to the commencement of the new office lease at our 250 Livingston Street property in January 2017.
Tenant recoveries, excluding Aspen, decreased from $1,070 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, to $1,016 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to higher recovery estimates in the 2016 period at 141 Livingston.
Garage and other income, excluding Aspen, increased from $704 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, to $786 for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The increase was across several categories, including garage, deposit forfeitures, laundry and leasing application fees.
Property Operations Expense. Property operating expenses include property-level costs including compensation costs for property-level personnel, repairs and maintenance, supplies, utilities and landscaping. Property operating expenses, excluding Aspen, increased from $6,133 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, to $6,292 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to increased collection activities and costs at the Flatbush Gardens property.
Real estate taxes and insurance expenses, excluding Aspen, increased from $4,078 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 to $4,665 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to increased taxes at the Flatbush Gardens and Tribeca House properties due in part to the cessation of real estate tax abatements.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense, excluding Aspen, increased from $2,087 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 to $2,471 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to increased staffing levels, transitional legal costs, an executive bonus and an increase in non-cash amortization of incentive compensation awards.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense, excluding Aspen, increased from $3,329 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 to $3,753 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, due to additions to real estate.
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net, excluding Aspen, was $9,650 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, and $8,229 for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The decrease results from lower balances and rates obtained in refinancing the Tribeca House property in November 2016 and the 141 Livingston Street property in May 2016 and lower amortization of loan costs. Interest expense includes amortization of loan costs and change in fair value of interest rate cap of $913 and $1,587 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Net Loss. As a result of the foregoing, net loss, excluding Aspen, decreased from $3,155 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, to $1,808 for the three months ended June 30, 2017.
Income Statement for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands)
2017 |
Less: Aspen |
2017 excluding Aspen |
2016 |
Less: Aspen |
2016 excluding Aspen |
Increase (decrease) |
% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential rental revenue |
$ | 36,116 | $ | 2,743 | $ | 33,373 | $ | 31,738 | $ | 66 | $ | 31,672 | $ | 1,701 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial rental revenue |
10,942 | 721 | 10,221 | 8,959 | 15 | 8,944 | 1,277 | 14.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenant recoveries |
2,061 | 2 | 2,059 | 1,883 | - | 1,883 | 176 | 9.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Garage and other income |
1,502 | 7 | 1,495 | 1,351 | - | 1,351 | 144 | 10.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
50,621 | 3,473 | 47,148 | 43,931 | 81 | 43,850 | 3,298 | 7.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
13,669 | 535 | 13,134 | 12,684 | 9 | 12,675 | 459 | 3.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate taxes and insurance |
9,469 | 297 | 9,172 | 8,140 | 11 | 8,129 | 1,043 | 12.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
4,784 | 203 | 4,581 | 3,922 | 3 | 3,919 | 662 | 16.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition costs |
27 | - | 27 | 407 | 399 | 8 | 19 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
7,998 | 619 | 7,379 | 6,638 | 19 | 6,619 | 760 | 11.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
35,947 | 1,654 | 34,293 | 31,791 | 441 | 31,350 | 2,943 | 9.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
14,674 | 1,819 | 12,855 | 12,140 | (360 | ) | 12,500 | 355 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(17,583 | ) | (1,397 | ) | (16,186 | ) | (18,863 | ) | (2 | ) | (18,861 | ) | 2,675 | (14.2 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (2,909 | ) | $ | 422 | $ | (3,331 | ) | $ | (6,723 | ) | $ | (362 | ) | $ | (6,361 | ) | $ | 3,030 | (47.6 | )% |
Revenue. Residential rental revenue, excluding Aspen, increased from $31,672 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $33,373 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, due to higher revenues on new leases and routine annual increases on renewals primarily at the Flatbush Gardens property complex and higher revenues on new leases at Tribeca House. Base rent per square foot increased at the Flatbush Gardens property from $20.83 (96.5% occupancy) at June 30, 2016 to $21.59 (97.0% leased occupancy) at June 30, 2017.
Commercial rental revenue, excluding Aspen, increased from $8,944 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $10,221 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to the commencement of the new office lease at the 250 Livingston Street property in January 2017.
Tenant recoveries, excluding Aspen, increased from $1,883 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $2,059 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to recoveries for higher real estate taxes and the change in terms in a retail lease at the Tribeca House property which provided for escalation payments commencing in July 2016.
Garage and other income, excluding Aspen, increased from $1,351 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $1,495 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase was across several categories, including garage, deposit forfeitures, laundry and leasing application fees.
Property Operations Expense. Property operating expenses include property-level costs including compensation costs for property-level personnel, repairs and maintenance, supplies, utilities and landscaping. Property operating expenses, excluding Aspen, increased from $12,675 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, to $13,134 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to higher payroll, utilities and collection expenses partially offset by lower repairs and maintenance, supplies and commission expenses.
Real estate taxes and insurance expenses, excluding Aspen, increased from $8,129 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, to $9,172 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to increased taxes at our Flatbush Gardens and Tribeca House properties due in part to the cessation of real estate tax abatements.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense, excluding Aspen, increased from $3,919 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, to $4,581 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to increase in staffing levels, transitional legal costs, an executive bonus and an increase in non-cash amortization of incentive compensation awards.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense, excluding Aspen, increased from $6,619 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, to $7,379 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, due to additions to real estate.
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net, excluding Aspen, was $18,861 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, and $16,186 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The decrease results from lower balances and rates obtained in refinancing the Tribeca House property in November 2016 and the 141 Livingston Street property in May 2016 and lower amortization of loan costs. Interest expense includes amortization of loan costs and change in fair value of interest rate cap of $1,771 and $3,104 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Net Loss. As a result of the foregoing, net loss, excluding Aspen, decreased from $6,361 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, to $3,331 for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2017, we had $810.5 million, net of unamortized issuance costs, of mortgage indebtedness secured by our properties and $68.5 million of cash, of which we expect to use approximately $26.0 million in the remainder of 2017 for capital projects. Apart from regularly scheduled amortization, we have $410.0 million of debt maturing in November 2018 subject to three one-year extension options as a result of the Tribeca House refinancing, $59.0 million of debt maturing in May 2020, $34.7 million of debt maturing in May 2023, $169.7 million of debt maturing in October 2024, $79.5 million maturing in June 2028 and $70.0 million of debt maturing in July 2028. No assurance can be given that we will be able to refinance any of these loans on favorable terms or at all.
On February 9, 2017, and March 10, 2017, we completed an IPO which provided net proceeds of approximately $78.8 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses payable by us.
As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gains, to stockholders on an annual basis. We expect that these needs will be met from cash generated from operations and other sources, including proceeds from secured mortgages and unsecured indebtedness, proceeds from additional equity issuances and cash generated from the sale of property.
Short-Term and Long-Term Liquidity Needs
Our short-term liquidity needs will primarily be to fund operating expenses, recurring capital expenditures, property taxes and insurance, interest and scheduled debt principal payments, general and administrative expenses and distributions to stockholders and unit holders. We generally expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through net cash provided by operations, and we believe we will have sufficient resources to meet our short-term liquidity requirements.
Our principal long-term liquidity needs will primarily be to fund additional property acquisitions, major renovation and upgrading projects, and debt payments and retirements at maturity. We do not expect that net cash provided by operations will be sufficient to meet all of these long-term liquidity needs. We anticipate meeting our long-term liquidity requirements by using cash as an interim measure and funds from public and private equity offerings and long-term secured and unsecured debt offerings.
We believe that as a publicly traded REIT, we will have access to multiple sources of capital to fund our long-term liquidity requirements. These sources include the incurrence of additional debt and the issuance of additional equity. However, we cannot assure you that this will be the case. Our ability to secure additional debt will depend on a number of factors, including our cash flow from operations, our degree of leverage, the value of our unencumbered assets and borrowing restrictions that may be imposed. Our ability to access the equity capital markets will depend on a number of factors as well, including general market conditions for REITs and market perceptions about our company.
We believe that our current cash flows from operations, coupled with additional mortgage debt, will be sufficient to allow us to continue operations, satisfy our contractual obligations and make distributions to our stockholders and the members of our LLC subsidiaries.
Property-Level Debt
The mortgages and mezzanine notes which are collateralized by their respective properties, member’s interest in the properties and assignment of leases, and the principal amounts outstanding as of June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, were as follows:
Property |
Maturity |
Interest Rate |
June 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||||
Flatbush Gardens, Brooklyn, NY |
10/1/2024 |
3.88 | % | $ | 149,779 | $ | 150,000 | ||||||
Flatbush Gardens, Brooklyn, NY |
10/1/2024 |
3.88 | % | 19,971 | 20,000 | ||||||||
250 Livingston Street, Brooklyn, NY |
5/6/2023 |
4.00 | % | 34,662 | 35,093 | ||||||||
141 Livingston Street, Brooklyn, NY |
6/1/2028 |
3.875 | % | 79,500 | 79,500 | ||||||||
Tribeca House properties, NY |
11/9/2018 |
LIBOR + 3.75 | % | 410,000 | 410,000 | ||||||||
Aspen property, NY |
7/1/2028 |
3.68 | % | 70,000 | 70,000 | ||||||||
107 Columbia Heights property, NY |
5/9/2020 |
LIBOR + 3.85 | % | 59,000 | — | ||||||||
$ | 822,912 | $ | 764,593 |
Tribeca House properties
There is $410 million of mortgage and mezzanine debt related to the Tribeca House properties, in the form of a mortgage note of $335 million to Deutsche Bank and a $75 million mezzanine note to SL Green Finance. Both the mortgage note and the mezzanine note mature on November 9, 2018, and give us the option to extend the maturity date up to three one-year terms. Under the mortgage note, we have the option to prepay the balance in whole, but not in part, without a prepayment penalty. Under the mezzanine note, we have the option to prepay the balance in whole, but not in part. In connection with both the mortgage and mezzanine debt, our Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and entities controlled by our Co-Chairman, Head of Investment Committee, entered into guaranties of recourse obligations.
Flatbush Gardens
There is $169.7 million of mortgage debt secured by Flatbush Gardens, as of June 30, 2017, in the form of two mortgage notes to New York Community Bank. A $150 million principal-amount mortgage note matures on October 1, 2024, and has a fixed interest rate of 3.88%. A $20 million principal-amount mortgage note also matures on October 1, 2024, and has an interest rate of 3.88% through September 2019, after which the interest rate is equal to Prime plus 2.75% (subject to an option to fix the rate). Both loans began principal amortization in June 2017 on a 30 year basis. Under both notes, we have the option to prepay all (but not less than all) of the unpaid balance of the loan prior to the maturity date, but must pay a prepayment premium of 3% if the prepayment occurs prior to October 1, 2017, 2% if it occurs from October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018, and 1% if it occurs from October 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. Our Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer entered into guarantees of recourse obligations in connection with both notes.
141 Livingston Street
There is $79.5 million in mortgage debt secured by 141 Livingston Street, as of June 30, 2017, in the form of a mortgage note to New York Community Bank. The note bears interest at 3.875% and matures on June 1, 2028. We may prepay the debt in whole or in part, subject to a prepayment premium. Our Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and entities controlled by our Co-Chairman, Head of Investment Committee, entered into a guaranty of recourse obligations in connection with this loan for which we will indemnify them.
250 Livingston Street
There is $34.7 million in mortgage debt secured by 250 Livingston Street, as of June 30, 2017, in the form of a mortgage note to Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp, which has been securitized. The note requires monthly principal and interest payments of $179,000, bears interest at 4.00% and matures on May 6, 2023. We may prepay the debt within two months of May 6, 2023, in whole without having to pay a prepayment premium. Our Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer entered into a guaranty of recourse obligations in connection with this loan for which we will indemnify him.
The Aspen Property
There is $70 million in mortgage debt secured by Aspen as of June 30, 2017, in the form of a mortgage note with Capital One Multifamily Finance LLC. The note matures on July 1, 2028, and bears interest at 3.68%. The note requires interest-only payments through July 2017, and monthly principal and interest payments of $321,000 from August 2017 through July 2028 based on a 30-year amortization schedule.
The 107 Columbia Heights Property
There is a $59 million mortgage note agreement with a unit of Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. secured by 107 Columbia Heights, entered into on May 9, 2017, in connection with the acquisition of the property. There is also a construction loan secured by the building with the same lender that will provide up to $14,700 for 100% of eligible capital improvements and carry costs. The notes mature on May 9, 2020, are subject to two one-year extensions and bear interest at one-month LIBOR plus 3.85%.
Cash Flows for the Six Months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands)
Six Months Ended |
||||||||
2017 |
2016 |
|||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 4,328 | $ | 4,991 | ||||
Investing activities |
(98,308 | ) | (111,384 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
124,917 | 85,120 |
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
Net cash flow provided by operating activities was $4,328 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $4,991 for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The change principally reflects $4,500 of higher cash flow from operating results (including the inclusion of the Aspen property purchased in late June 2016) offset by $5,163 of cash used by operating assets and liabilities including increases in restricted cash and payments of accounts payable.
Net cash used in investing activities was $98,308 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $111,384 for the six months ended June 30, 2016. In addition to capital spending in excess of $8,000 in both periods, cash was used in the six months ended June 30, 2017, to fund an acquisition deposit for 10 West 65th Street and the acquisition of 107 Columbia Heights and, in the six months ended June 30, 2016, to fund the acquisition of Aspen.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $124,917 and $85,120 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Cash was provided in the six months ended June 30, 2017, by the IPO completed in February and March ($78,811) and proceeds from the loan used in the 107 Columbia Heights acquisition ($55,146); and in the six months ended June 30, 2016, by refinancing the mortgage loan at 141 Livingston in May 2016 and the mortgage loan used in the Aspen acquisition in June 2016 ($90,395). The Company paid distributions of $8,056 and $4,969 in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Income Taxes
No provision has been made for income taxes since all of the Company’s operations are held in pass-through entities and accordingly the income or loss of the Company is included in the individual income tax returns of the partners or members.
We elected to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, beginning with our first taxable three months ended March 31, 2015. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. We believe that we are organized and operate in a manner that will enable us to qualify and be taxed as a REIT and we intend to continue to operate so as to satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
Inflation
Inflation in the United States has been relatively low in recent years and did not have a significant impact on the results of operations for the Company’s business for the periods shown in the consolidated historical financial statements. We do not believe that inflation currently poses a material risk to the Company. The leases at our residential rental properties which comprise approximately 75% of our revenue are short-term in nature. Our longer-term commercial and retail leases would generally allow us to recover some increased costs in the event of significant inflation.
Although the impact of inflation has been relatively insignificant in recent years, it does remain a factor in the United States economy and could increase the cost of acquiring or replacing properties in the future.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2017, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have had or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital resources or capital expenditures.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we disclose and discuss funds from operations (“FFO”), adjusted funds from operations (“AFFO”), Adjusted EBITDA, and net operating income (“NOI”) all of which meet the definition of “non-GAAP financial measure” set forth in Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.
While management and the investment community in general believes that presentation of these measures provides useful information to investors, neither FFO, AFFO, Adjusted EBITDA, nor NOI should be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) or income from operations as an indication of our performance. We believe that to understand our performance further, FFO, AFFO, Adjusted EBITDA, and NOI should be compared with our reported net income or net loss or income from operations and considered in addition to cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements.
Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations
FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) from sales of property (and impairment adjustments), plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Our calculation of FFO is consistent with FFO as defined by NAREIT.
AFFO is defined by us as FFO excluding amortization of identifiable intangibles incurred in property acquisitions, straight line rent adjustments to revenue from long-term leases and amortization costs incurred in originating debt.
Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. In fact, real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions. FFO is intended to be a standard supplemental measure of operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation and valuation adjustments from net income. We consider FFO useful in evaluating potential property acquisitions and measuring operating performance. We further consider AFFO useful in determining funds available for payment of distributions. FFO and AFFO do not represent net income or cash flows from operations as defined by GAAP. You should not consider FFO and AFFO to be alternatives to net income as a reliable measure of our operating performance; nor should you consider FFO and AFFO to be alternatives to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities (as defined by GAAP) as measures of liquidity.
FFO and AFFO do not measure whether cash flow is sufficient to fund all of our cash needs, including principal amortization, capital improvements and distributions to stockholders. FFO and AFFO do not represent cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as defined by GAAP. Further, FFO and AFFO as disclosed by other REITs might not be comparable to our calculations of FFO and AFFO.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of FFO and AFFO for the periods presented to net loss before allocation to non-controlling interests, as computed in accordance with GAAP (amounts in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2017 |
2016 |
2017 |
2016 |
|||||||||||||
FFO |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (1,611 | ) | $ | (3,517 | ) | $ | (2,909 | ) | $ | (6,723 | ) | ||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
4,063 | 3,348 | 7,998 | 6,638 | ||||||||||||
FFO |
$ | 2,452 | $ | (169 | ) | $ | 5,089 | $ | (85 | ) | ||||||
AFFO |
||||||||||||||||
FFO |
$ | 2,452 | $ | (169 | ) | $ | 5,089 | $ | (85 | ) | ||||||
Real estate tax intangible amortization |
392 | 330 | 784 | 668 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of above and below-market leases |
(432 | ) | (489 | ) | (866 | ) | (919 | ) | ||||||||
Straight-line rent adjustment |
78 | (22 | ) | 156 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of debt origination costs |
721 | 1,587 | 1,442 | 3,095 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate cap mark-to-market |
192 | - | 329 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of LTIP awards |
834 | 602 | 1,429 | 1,112 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition costs |
6 | 401 | 27 | 407 | ||||||||||||
Recurring capital spending |
(141 | ) | (195 | ) | (277 | ) | (414 | ) | ||||||||
AFFO |
$ | 4,102 | $ | 2,045 | $ | 8,113 | $ | 3,854 |
Adjusted earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and stock based compensation
We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is a useful measure of our operating performance. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before allocation to non-controlling interests plus real estate depreciation and amortization, amortization of identifiable intangibles, interest expense, net, and acquisition costs and stock-based compensation. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating Adjusted EBITDA, and accordingly, our Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other REITs.
We believe that this measure provides an operating perspective not immediately apparent from GAAP operating income or net income. We use Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate our performance because Adjusted EBITDA allows us to evaluate the operating performance of our company by measuring the core operations of property performance and administrative expenses available for debt service.
However, Adjusted EBITDA should only be used as an alternative measure of our financial performance. The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2017 |
2016 |
2017 |
2016 |
|||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (1,611 | ) | $ | (3,517 | ) | $ | (2,909 | ) | $ | (6,723 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,063 | 3,348 | 7,998 | 6,638 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of real estate tax intangible |
392 | 330 | 784 | 668 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of above and below-market leases |
(432 | ) | (489 | ) | (866 | ) | (919 | ) | ||||||||
Straight-line rent adjustment |
78 | (22 | ) | 156 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of LTIP awards |
834 | 602 | 1,429 | 1,112 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
8,931 | 9,652 | 17,582 | 18,863 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition costs |
6 | 401 | 27 | 407 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 12,261 | $ | 10,305 | $ | 24,201 | $ | 20,027 |
Net operating income
We believe that Net Operating Income (“NOI”) is a useful measure of our operating performance. We define Net Operating Income as income from operations plus real estate depreciation and amortization, acquisition costs, general and administrative costs and amortization of identifiable intangibles. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating NOI, and accordingly, our NOI may not be comparable to other REITs. We believe that this measure is widely recognized and provides an operating perspective not immediately apparent from GAAP operating income or net income. We use NOI to evaluate our performance because NOI allows us to evaluate the operating performance of our company by measuring the core operations of property performance and capturing trends in rental housing and property operating expenses. NOI is also a widely used metric in valuation of properties. However, NOI should only be used as an alternative measure of our financial performance.
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2017 |
2016 |
2017 |
2016 |
|||||||||||||
NOI |
||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 7,320 | $ | 6,135 | $ | 14,674 | $ | 12,140 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,063 | 3,348 | 7,998 | 6,638 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
2,588 | 2,090 | 4,784 | 3,922 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition costs |
6 | 401 | 27 | 407 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of real estate tax intangible |
392 | 330 | 784 | 668 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of above and below-market leases |
(432 | ) | (489 | ) | (866 | ) | (919 | ) | ||||||||
Straight-line rent adjustment |
78 | (22 | ) | 156 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
NOI |
$ | 14,015 | $ | 11,793 | $ | 27,557 | $ | 22,837 |
Critical Accounting Policies
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe that there have been no material changes to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our 2016 Form 10-K.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 for information relating to new accounting pronouncements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our future income, cash flows and fair value relevant to our financial instruments depends upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Based upon the nature of our operations, the principal market risk to which we are exposed is the risk related to interest rate fluctuations. Many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations, and other factors that are beyond our control contribute to interest rate risk. To manage this risk, we purchased interest rate caps on approximately $469 million of the $822.9 million principal amount of mortgage debt outstanding as of June 30, 2017, that would provide interest protection if one month LIBOR exceeds 2.0% for the Tribeca House loans and 3.0% for the 107 Columbia Heights loan.
A one percent change in interest rates on our $469 million of variable rate mortgage debt would impact annual net income by approximately $4.7 million.
The fair value of the Company’s notes payable was approximately $811.9 million and $749.3 million as of June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act)), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that as of June 30, 2017, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in management’s evaluation pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d) or 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDIngs
On July 3, 2017, the New York Supreme Court (the “Court”) ruled in favor of 41 present or former tenants of apartment units at the Company’s buildings located at 50 Murray Street and 53 Park Place in Manhattan, New York, who brought an action against the Company alleging that they were subject to applicable rent stabilization laws with the result that rental payments charged by the Company exceeded amounts permitted under these laws because the buildings were receiving certain tax abatements under Real Property Tax Law 421-g. The Court also awarded the plaintiffs, their attorney’s fees and costs. The Court declared that the plaintiff-tenants were subject to rent stabilization requirements and referred the matter to a special referee to determine the amount of rent over-charges, if any. Two other cases have resulted in similar decisions. The Company believes that these court decisions are incorrect and conflict with other recent court decisions that directly uphold the Company’s position. On July 18, 2017, the Court stayed the above decision and the Company intends to expeditiously appeal the Court’s decision to the Appellate Division, First Department. Due to the inherent uncertainty and unpredictability of litigation, we cannot determine at this time with any specificity the Company’s potential liability.
In addition to the above, from time to time, we are party to various lawsuits, claims for negligence and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims or litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations if determined adversely to us.
item 1a. RISK FACTORS
The risk factors disclosed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, set forth information relating to various risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Such risk factors continue to be relevant to an understanding of our business, financial condition and operating results. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there have been no material changes with respect to such risk factors.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities:
On February 9, 2017, our registration statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-214021) was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission for our IPO, pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 6,390,149 primary shares of our common stock (including the exercise of the over-allotment option, which closed on March 10, 2017) at a price to the public of $13.50 per share. FBR Capital Markets & Co., Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Janney Montgomery Scott LLC and Wunderlich Securities, Inc. served as underwriters. On February 9, 2017, we closed the sale of such shares and on March 10, 2017, we closed the sale of the over-allotment option, resulting in aggregate net proceeds of approximately $78.8 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $5.1 million and other offering expenses of approximately $3.0 million. No payments were made by us to directors, officers or persons owning ten percent or more of our common stock or to their associates, or to our affiliates. There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our initial public offering as described in our final prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2017, pursuant to Rule 424(b).
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
Exhibit Number |
Description | ||
*31.1 |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer | ||
*31.2 |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer | ||
*32.1 |
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
*32.2 |
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
**101.INS |
XBRL Instance Document. | ||
**101.SCH |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | ||
**101.CAL |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | ||
**101.LAB |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | ||
**101.PRE |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | ||
**101 DEF |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
*Filed herewith
**Submitted electronically with the report
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned.
|
Clipper realty inc. | |
|
|
|
July 27, 2017 |
By: |
/s/ David Bistricer |
|
|
David Bistricer |
Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit Number |
Description | ||
*31.1 |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer | ||
*31.2 |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer | ||
*32.1 |
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
*32.2 |
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
**101.INS |
XBRL Instance Document. | ||
**101.SCH |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | ||
**101.CAL |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | ||
**101.LAB |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | ||
**101.PRE |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | ||
**101 DEF |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
*Filed herewith
**Submitted electronically with the report
34