COMMUNITY BANCORP /VT - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC
20549
FORM
10-Q
[ x ] QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2017
OR
[ ] TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the transition period from to
Commission File
Number 000-16435
Vermont
|
03-0284070
|
(State
of Incorporation)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification Number)
|
|
|
4811
US Route 5, Derby, Vermont
|
05829
|
(Address of
Principal Executive Offices)
|
(zip
code)
|
|
|
Registrant's
Telephone Number: (802) 334-7915
|
Indicate by check
mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the Registrant was required to file for such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes ( X ) No
( )
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted
on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such files). YES ( X ) NO (
)
Indicate by check
mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer ( )
|
Accelerated filer
( )
|
Non-accelerated
filer ( ) (Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
|
Smaller reporting
company ( X )
|
|
Emerging growth
company ( )
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
( )
1
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES
( ) NO(X)
At
August 04, 2017, there were 5,086,739 shares outstanding of the
Corporation's common stock.
FORM
10-Q
|
||
Index
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
PART
I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1
|
Financial
Statements
|
3
|
Item
2
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
31
|
Item
3
|
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
53
|
Item
4
|
Controls and
Procedures
|
53
|
|
|
|
PART
II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
53
|
Item
1A
|
Risk
Factors
|
53
|
Item
2
|
Unregistered Sales
of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
54
|
Item
6
|
Exhibits
|
54
|
|
Signatures
|
55
|
|
Exhibit
Index
|
56
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The
following are the unaudited consolidated financial statements for
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary, "the Company".
2
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
June 30,
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
2017
|
2016
|
2016
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Cash
and due from banks
|
$21,659,982
|
$10,943,344
|
$20,573,382
|
Federal
funds sold and overnight deposits
|
15,365,739
|
18,670,942
|
3,760,906
|
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
37,025,721
|
29,614,286
|
24,334,288
|
Securities
held-to-maturity (HTM) (fair value $37,065,000 at
06/30/17,
|
|
|
|
$51,035,000
at 12/31/16 and $34,682,000 at 06/30/16)
|
36,418,414
|
49,886,631
|
34,013,002
|
Securities
available-for-sale (AFS)
|
35,634,716
|
33,715,051
|
28,079,675
|
Restricted
equity securities, at cost
|
1,942,550
|
2,755,850
|
2,610,050
|
Loans
held-for-sale
|
571,200
|
0
|
581,250
|
Loans
|
502,772,845
|
487,249,226
|
471,567,355
|
Allowance
for loan losses (ALL)
|
(5,374,378)
|
(5,278,445)
|
(5,077,420)
|
Deferred
net loan costs
|
323,371
|
310,130
|
320,298
|
Net
loans
|
497,721,838
|
482,280,911
|
466,810,233
|
Bank
premises and equipment, net
|
10,555,451
|
10,830,556
|
10,996,815
|
Accrued
interest receivable
|
1,746,403
|
1,818,510
|
1,557,749
|
Bank
owned life insurance (BOLI)
|
4,673,739
|
4,625,406
|
4,572,871
|
Core
deposit intangible
|
136,341
|
272,691
|
409,036
|
Goodwill
|
11,574,269
|
11,574,269
|
11,574,269
|
Other
real estate owned (OREO)
|
343,928
|
394,000
|
409,000
|
Other
assets
|
9,829,772
|
9,885,504
|
10,259,495
|
Total
assets
|
$648,174,342
|
$637,653,665
|
$596,207,733
|
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
Demand,
non-interest bearing
|
$110,398,464
|
$104,472,268
|
$95,419,388
|
Interest-bearing
transaction accounts
|
116,869,761
|
118,053,360
|
106,925,038
|
Money
market funds
|
73,279,696
|
79,042,619
|
70,354,509
|
Savings
|
97,929,768
|
86,776,856
|
86,733,253
|
Time
deposits, $250,000 and over
|
23,808,349
|
19,274,880
|
14,764,902
|
Other
time deposits
|
111,021,241
|
97,115,049
|
94,786,066
|
Total
deposits
|
533,307,279
|
504,735,032
|
468,983,156
|
Borrowed
funds
|
13,550,000
|
31,550,000
|
30,350,000
|
Repurchase
agreements
|
28,862,766
|
30,423,195
|
26,837,466
|
Capital
lease obligations
|
435,243
|
483,161
|
515,256
|
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
12,887,000
|
12,887,000
|
12,887,000
|
Accrued
interest and other liabilities
|
3,014,740
|
3,123,760
|
3,680,616
|
Total
liabilities
|
592,057,028
|
583,202,148
|
543,253,494
|
Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 25 shares issued
|
|
|
|
and
outstanding ($100,000 liquidation value)
|
2,500,000
|
2,500,000
|
2,500,000
|
Common
stock - $2.50 par value; 15,000,000 shares authorized,
|
|
|
|
5,297,753
shares issued at 06/30/17, 5,269,053 shares issued
|
|
|
|
at
12/31/16 and 5,236,891 shares issued at 06/30/16
|
13,244,383
|
13,172,633
|
13,092,228
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
31,227,266
|
30,825,658
|
30,449,175
|
Retained
earnings
|
11,809,846
|
10,666,782
|
9,302,122
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income
|
(41,404)
|
(90,779)
|
233,491
|
Less:
treasury stock, at cost; 210,101 shares at 06/30/17,
|
|
|
|
12/31/16,
and 06/30/16
|
(2,622,777)
|
(2,622,777)
|
(2,622,777)
|
Total
shareholders' equity
|
56,117,314
|
54,451,517
|
52,954,239
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$648,174,342
|
$637,653,665
|
$596,207,733
|
|
|
|
|
Book
value per common share outstanding
|
$10.54
|
$10.27
|
$10.04
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements
3
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
2017
|
2016
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$5,875,766
|
$5,478,997
|
Interest
on debt securities
|
|
|
Taxable
|
164,644
|
128,197
|
Tax-exempt
|
336,197
|
322,150
|
Dividends
|
40,864
|
29,334
|
Interest
on federal funds sold and overnight deposits
|
27,366
|
4,700
|
Total
interest income
|
6,444,837
|
5,963,378
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
Interest
on deposits
|
568,110
|
508,701
|
Interest
on borrowed funds
|
28,044
|
34,245
|
Interest
on repurchase agreements
|
22,235
|
19,314
|
Interest
on junior subordinated debentures
|
131,115
|
114,735
|
Total
interest expense
|
749,504
|
676,995
|
|
|
|
Net
interest income
|
5,695,333
|
5,286,383
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
150,000
|
150,000
|
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
5,545,333
|
5,136,383
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
Service
fees
|
772,238
|
655,540
|
Income
from sold loans
|
184,072
|
231,297
|
Other
income from loans
|
209,288
|
210,703
|
Net
realized gain on sale of securities available-for-sale
|
1,270
|
0
|
Other
income
|
214,863
|
221,159
|
Total
non-interest income
|
1,381,731
|
1,318,699
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
Salaries
and wages
|
1,703,751
|
1,725,000
|
Employee
benefits
|
692,418
|
685,082
|
Occupancy
expenses, net
|
661,294
|
606,358
|
Other
expenses
|
1,835,105
|
1,658,740
|
Total
non-interest expense
|
4,892,568
|
4,675,180
|
|
|
|
Income
before income taxes
|
2,034,496
|
1,779,902
|
Income tax
expense
|
534,983
|
484,703
|
Net
income
|
$1,499,513
|
$1,295,199
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
common share
|
$0.29
|
$0.25
|
Weighted
average number of common shares
|
|
|
used
in computing earnings per share
|
5,077,698
|
5,016,097
|
Dividends
declared per common share
|
$0.17
|
$0.16
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
4
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
2017
|
2016
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$11,492,633
|
$10,849,421
|
Interest
on debt securities
|
|
|
Taxable
|
316,370
|
255,646
|
Tax-exempt
|
660,729
|
602,247
|
Dividends
|
76,660
|
58,713
|
Interest
on federal funds sold and overnight deposits
|
54,838
|
15,606
|
Total
interest income
|
12,601,230
|
11,781,633
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
Interest
on deposits
|
1,105,899
|
1,025,295
|
Interest
on borrowed funds
|
80,279
|
53,403
|
Interest
on repurchase agreements
|
43,762
|
37,305
|
Interest
on junior subordinated debentures
|
253,975
|
224,254
|
Total
interest expense
|
1,483,915
|
1,340,257
|
|
|
|
Net
interest income
|
11,117,315
|
10,441,376
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
300,000
|
250,000
|
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
10,817,315
|
10,191,376
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
Service
fees
|
1,520,355
|
1,273,219
|
Income
from sold loans
|
374,367
|
452,491
|
Other
income from loans
|
394,905
|
406,591
|
Net
realized gain on sale of securities available-for-sale
|
3,400
|
0
|
Other
income
|
458,922
|
424,249
|
Total
non-interest income
|
2,751,949
|
2,556,550
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
Salaries
and wages
|
3,414,875
|
3,450,000
|
Employee
benefits
|
1,333,979
|
1,370,164
|
Occupancy
expenses, net
|
1,348,727
|
1,252,104
|
Other
expenses
|
3,526,106
|
3,285,204
|
Total
non-interest expense
|
9,623,687
|
9,357,472
|
|
|
|
Income
before income taxes
|
3,945,577
|
3,390,454
|
Income tax
expense
|
1,031,848
|
925,761
|
Net
income
|
$2,913,729
|
$2,464,693
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
common share
|
$0.57
|
$0.48
|
Weighted
average number of common shares
|
|
|
used
in computing earnings per share
|
5,070,453
|
5,008,121
|
Dividends
declared per common share
|
$0.34
|
$0.32
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
5
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$1,499,513
|
$1,295,199
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
Unrealized
holding gain on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
arising
during the period
|
95,682
|
87,670
|
Reclassification
adjustment for gain realized in income
|
(1,270)
|
0
|
Unrealized
gain during the period
|
94,412
|
87,670
|
Tax effect
|
(32,100)
|
(29,808)
|
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax
|
62,312
|
57,862
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
$1,561,825
|
$1,353,061
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$2,913,729
|
$2,464,693
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
Unrealized
holding gain on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
arising
during the period
|
78,212
|
422,553
|
Reclassification
adjustment for gain realized in income
|
(3,400)
|
0
|
Unrealized
gain during the period
|
74,812
|
422,553
|
Tax effect
|
(25,437)
|
(143,668)
|
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax
|
49,375
|
278,885
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
$2,963,104
|
$2,743,578
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
6
Community Bancorp. and Subsidiary
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$2,913,729
|
$2,464,693
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
|
|
|
operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization, bank premises and equipment
|
512,956
|
514,925
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
300,000
|
250,000
|
Deferred
income tax
|
(216,506)
|
(182,039)
|
Gain
on sale of securities available-for-sale
|
(3,400)
|
0
|
Gain
on sale of loans
|
(159,123)
|
(212,500)
|
Loss
on sale of bank premises and equipment
|
1,580
|
0
|
Loss
on sale of OREO
|
617
|
4,965
|
Income
from Trust LLC
|
(198,514)
|
(183,581)
|
Amortization
of bond premium, net
|
56,186
|
65,277
|
Write
down of OREO
|
0
|
26,000
|
Proceeds
from sales of loans held for sale
|
7,600,841
|
11,538,775
|
Originations
of loans held for sale
|
(8,012,918)
|
(10,708,125)
|
Increase
in taxes payable
|
539,738
|
164,820
|
Decrease
in interest receivable
|
72,107
|
75,464
|
Decrease
in mortgage servicing rights
|
59,454
|
28,931
|
Increase
in other assets
|
(462,492)
|
(126,928)
|
Increase
in cash surrender value of BOLI
|
(48,333)
|
(52,385)
|
Amortization
of core deposit intangible
|
136,350
|
136,350
|
Amortization
of limited partnerships
|
308,616
|
292,980
|
Increase
in unamortized loan costs
|
(13,241)
|
(3,807)
|
Increase
in interest payable
|
52,847
|
8,020
|
Decrease
in accrued expenses
|
(108,774)
|
(49,844)
|
(Decrease)
increase in other liabilities
|
(68,688)
|
4,964
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
3,263,032
|
4,056,955
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
Investments
- held-to-maturity
|
|
|
Maturities
and pay downs
|
22,418,808
|
22,584,457
|
Purchases
|
(8,950,591)
|
(13,243,040)
|
Investments
- available-for-sale
|
|
|
Maturities,
calls, pay downs and sales
|
2,324,014
|
3,954,848
|
Purchases
|
(4,221,653)
|
(5,206,847)
|
Proceeds
from redemption of restricted equity securities
|
813,300
|
822,100
|
Purchases
of restricted equity securities
|
0
|
(990,500)
|
Decrease
in limited partnership contributions payable
|
(27,000)
|
0
|
Increase
in loans, net
|
(16,101,325)
|
(14,070,392)
|
Capital
expenditures for bank premises and equipment
|
(239,431)
|
(51,533)
|
Proceeds
from sales of OREO
|
383,117
|
217,143
|
Recoveries
of loans charged off
|
39,977
|
42,900
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(3,560,784)
|
(5,940,864)
|
7
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in demand and interest-bearing transaction
accounts
|
4,742,597
|
(21,916,430)
|
Net
increase (decrease) in money market and savings
accounts
|
5,389,989
|
(6,574,416)
|
Net
increase in time deposits
|
18,439,661
|
1,988,440
|
Net
(decrease) increase in repurchase agreements
|
(1,560,429)
|
4,764,228
|
Net
(decrease) increase in short-term borrowings
|
(20,000,000)
|
20,000,000
|
Proceeds
from long-term borrowings
|
2,000,000
|
350,000
|
Decrease
in capital lease obligations
|
(47,918)
|
(43,109)
|
Dividends
paid on preferred stock
|
(48,438)
|
(43,750)
|
Dividends
paid on common stock
|
(1,206,275)
|
(1,158,656)
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
7,709,187
|
(2,633,693)
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
7,411,435
|
(4,517,602)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
Beginning
|
29,614,286
|
28,851,890
|
Ending
|
$37,025,721
|
$24,334,288
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Schedule of Cash Paid During the Period:
|
|
|
Interest
|
$1,431,068
|
$1,332,237
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes, net of refunds
|
$400,000
|
$650,000
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing and Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
Change
in unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale
|
$74,812
|
$422,553
|
|
|
|
Loans
transferred to OREO
|
$333,662
|
$395,108
|
|
|
|
Common Shares Dividends Paid:
|
|
|
Dividends
declared
|
$1,722,227
|
$1,600,917
|
Increase
in dividends payable attributable to dividends
declared
|
(42,594)
|
(1,589)
|
Dividends
reinvested
|
(473,358)
|
(440,672)
|
|
$1,206,275
|
$1,158,656
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The
interim consolidated financial statements of Community Bancorp. and
Subsidiary are unaudited. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation
of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
of the Company and its subsidiary, Community National Bank (the
Bank), contained herein have been made. The unaudited consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year
ended December 31, 2016 contained in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K. The results of operations for the interim period are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected
for the full annual period ending December 31, 2017, or for any
other interim period.
Certain amounts in
the 2016 unaudited consolidated income statements have been
reclassified to conform to the 2017 presentation. Reclassifications
had no effect on prior period net income or shareholders’
equity.
Note 2. Recent Accounting Developments
In
January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic
825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. This guidance changes how entities
account for equity investments that do not result in consolidation
and are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
This guidance also changes certain disclosure requirements and
other aspects of current accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (US GAAP). Public businesses must
use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of
financial instruments for disclosure purposes. This guidance is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017,
including interim periods within the fiscal year. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of the ASU on its
consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The ASU was issued
to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by
recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet
and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The ASU
is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018,
including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early
application of the amendments in the ASU is permitted for all
entities. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the
adoption of the ASU on its consolidated financial
statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.
2016-13, Financial
Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit
Losses on Financial Instruments. Under the new guidance, which will
replace the existing incurred loss model for recognizing credit
losses, banks and other lending institutions will be required to
recognize the full amount of expected credit
losses. The new guidance, which is referred to as the Current
Expected Credit Loss (CECL) model, requires that expected credit
losses for financial assets held at the reporting date that are
accounted for at amortized cost be measured and recognized based on
historical experience and current and reasonably supportable
forecasted conditions to reflect the full amount of expected credit
losses. A modified
version of these requirements also applies to debt securities
classified as available for sale, which will require that credit
losses on those securities be recorded through an allowance for
credit losses rather than a write-down. The ASU is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods
within such years. The Company is evaluating the
impact of
the adoption of the ASU on its consolidated financial
statements. The ASU may have a material impact on the
Company's consolidated financial statements upon adoption as it
will require a change in the Company's methodology for calculating
its ALL and allowance on unused commitments. The Company will
transition from an incurred loss model to an expected loss model,
which will likely result in an increase in the ALL upon adoption
and may negatively impact the Company and the Bank's regulatory
capital ratios. Additionally, ASU No. 2016-13 may reduce the
carrying value of the Company's HTM investment securities as it
will require an allowance on the expected losses over the life of
these securities to be recorded upon adoption. The Company has
formed a committee to assess the implications of this new
pronouncement and transitioned to a software solution for preparing
the ALL calculation and related reports that provides the Company
with stronger data integrity, ease and efficiency in ALL
preparation. The new software solution also provides numerous
training opportunities for the appropriate personnel within the
Company.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles -
Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The ASU was
issued to reduce the cost and complexity of the goodwill impairment
test. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, step two
of the goodwill impairment test was eliminated. Instead, a Company
will recognize an impairment of goodwill should the carrying value
of a reporting unit exceed its fair value (i.e. step one). The ASU
will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2020 and will be
applied prospectively.
9
The
Company has goodwill from its acquisition of LyndonBank in 2007 and
performs an impairment test annually or more frequently if
circumstances warrant (see Note 6). The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of the adoption of the ASU on its
consolidated financial statements, but does not anticipate any
material impact at this time.
The FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,
Revenue from
Contracts with Customers,
in 2014 to replace the current plethora of industry-specific rules
with a broad, principles-based framework for recognizing and
measuring revenue. Due to the complexity of the new pronouncement
and the anticipated effort required by entities in many industries
to implement ASU No. 2014-09, FASB delayed the effective date. ASU
2014-09 is effective for the Company for annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2017.
FASB formed a Transition Resource Group to
assist it in identifying implementation issues that may require
further clarification or amendment to ASU No. 2014-09. As a result
of that group’s deliberations, FASB has issued several
amendments, which will be effective concurrently with ASU No.
2014-09, including ASU No. 2016-08, Principal versus Agent
Considerations, which
clarifies whether an entity should record the gross amount of
revenue or only its ultimate share when a third party is also
involved in providing goods or services to a customer. Since the
guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial
instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for
under other US GAAP, the Company does not expect the new guidance
to have a material impact on revenue most closely associated with
financial instruments, including interest income and expense. The
Company is currently performing an overall assessment of revenue
streams and reviewing contracts potentially affected by the ASU
including
deposit related
fees, interchange fees, and merchant income, to determine the
potential impact the new guidance is expected to have on the
Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, the
Company continues to follow certain implementation issues relevant
to the banking industry which are still pending
resolution.
Note 3. Earnings per Common Share
Earnings per
common share amounts are computed based on the weighted average
number of shares of common stock issued during the period
(retroactively adjusted for stock splits and stock dividends, if
any), including Dividend Reinvestment Plan shares issuable upon
reinvestment of dividends declared, and reduced for shares held in
treasury.
The
following tables illustrate the calculation of earnings per common
share for the periods presented, as adjusted for the cash dividends
declared on the preferred stock:
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Net
income, as reported
|
$1,499,513
|
$1,295,199
|
Less:
dividends to preferred shareholders
|
25,000
|
21,875
|
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$1,474,513
|
$1,273,324
|
Weighted average
number of common shares
|
|
|
used
in calculating earnings per share
|
5,077,698
|
5,016,097
|
Earnings per
common share
|
$0.29
|
$0.25
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Net
income, as reported
|
$2,913,729
|
$2,464,693
|
Less:
dividends to preferred shareholders
|
48,438
|
43,750
|
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$2,865,291
|
$2,420,943
|
Weighted average
number of common shares
|
|
|
used
in calculating earnings per share
|
5,070,453
|
5,008,121
|
Earnings per
common share
|
$0.57
|
$0.48
|
10
Note 4. Investment Securities
Securities AFS and
HTM as of the balance sheet dates consisted of the
following:
|
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
|
|
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Securities AFS
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Government sponsored enterprise (GSE) debt securities
|
$18,356,415
|
$14,654
|
$57,881
|
$18,313,188
|
Agency
mortgage-backed securities (Agency MBS)
|
13,128,034
|
23,950
|
73,365
|
13,078,619
|
Other
investments
|
4,213,000
|
31,180
|
1,271
|
4,242,909
|
|
$35,697,449
|
$69,784
|
$132,517
|
$35,634,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
GSE debt securities
|
$17,365,805
|
$24,854
|
$73,331
|
$17,317,328
|
Agency
MBS
|
13,265,790
|
3,896
|
115,458
|
13,154,228
|
Other
investments
|
3,221,000
|
24,947
|
2,452
|
3,243,495
|
|
$33,852,595
|
$53,697
|
$191,241
|
$33,715,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
GSE debt securities
|
$11,752,750
|
$138,140
|
$0
|
$11,890,890
|
Agency
MBS
|
13,000,152
|
166,905
|
15,410
|
13,151,647
|
Other
investments
|
2,973,000
|
64,138
|
0
|
3,037,138
|
|
$27,725,902
|
$369,183
|
$15,410
|
$28,079,675
|
|
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
|
|
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Securities HTM
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value*
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
States
and political subdivisions
|
$36,418,414
|
$646,586
|
$0
|
$37,065,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
States
and political subdivisions
|
$49,886,631
|
$1,148,369
|
$0
|
$51,035,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
States
and political subdivisions
|
$34,013,002
|
$668,998
|
$0
|
$34,682,000
|
*Method used to
determine fair value of HTM securities rounds values to nearest
thousand.
Investments
pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements consisted of U.S.
GSE debt securities, Agency MBS securities and certificates of
deposit (CDs). These repurchase agreements mature daily. These
investments as of the balance sheet dates were as
follows:
|
Amortized
|
Fair
|
|
Cost
|
Value
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
$35,697,449
|
$35,634,716
|
December 31,
2016
|
33,604,595
|
33,469,254
|
June
30, 2016
|
27,725,902
|
28,079,675
|
11
The
scheduled maturities of debt securities AFS as of the balance sheet
dates were as follows:
|
Amortized
|
Fair
|
|
Cost
|
Value
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
Due in
one year or less
|
$3,001,770
|
$3,001,473
|
Due
from one to five years
|
17,322,645
|
17,326,400
|
Due
from five to ten years
|
2,245,000
|
2,228,224
|
Agency
MBS
|
13,128,034
|
13,078,619
|
|
$35,697,449
|
$35,634,716
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
Due in
one year or less
|
$2,006,027
|
$2,010,287
|
Due
from one to five years
|
17,335,778
|
17,329,503
|
Due
from five to ten years
|
1,245,000
|
1,221,033
|
Agency
MBS
|
13,265,790
|
13,154,228
|
|
$33,852,595
|
$33,715,051
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
Due in
one year or less
|
$1,000,000
|
$1,003,413
|
Due
from one to five years
|
12,480,750
|
12,674,932
|
Due
from five to ten years
|
1,245,000
|
1,249,683
|
Agency
MBS
|
13,000,152
|
13,151,647
|
|
$27,725,902
|
$28,079,675
|
Because the actual
maturities of Agency MBS usually differ from their contractual
maturities due to the right of borrowers to prepay the underlying
mortgage loans, usually without penalty, those securities are not
presented in the table by contractual maturity date.
The
scheduled maturities of debt securities HTM as of the balance sheet
dates were as follows:
|
Amortized
|
Fair
|
|
Cost
|
Value*
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
Due in
one year or less
|
$11,987,857
|
$11,988,000
|
Due
from one to five years
|
3,987,322
|
4,149,000
|
Due
from five to ten years
|
3,744,385
|
3,906,000
|
Due
after ten years
|
16,698,850
|
17,022,000
|
|
$36,418,414
|
$37,065,000
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
Due in
one year or less
|
$25,368,725
|
$25,369,000
|
Due
from one to five years
|
4,030,900
|
4,318,000
|
Due
from five to ten years
|
4,013,242
|
4,300,000
|
Due
after ten years
|
16,473,764
|
17,048,000
|
|
$49,886,631
|
$51,035,000
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
Due in
one year or less
|
$11,824,312
|
$11,824,000
|
Due
from one to five years
|
4,152,445
|
4,320,000
|
Due
from five to ten years
|
3,466,701
|
3,634,000
|
Due
after ten years
|
14,569,544
|
14,904,000
|
|
$34,013,002
|
$34,682,000
|
*Method used to
determine fair value of HTM securities rounds values to nearest
thousand.
12
There
were no debt securities HTM in an unrealized loss position as of
the balance sheet dates. Debt securities AFS with unrealized losses
as of the balance sheet dates are presented in the table below.
There were no debt securities with unrealized losses of 12 months
or more as of the balance sheet dates presented.
|
Less than 12 months
|
||
|
Number of
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
|
Securities
|
Value
|
Loss
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
U.S.
GSE debt securities
|
9
|
$10,724,642
|
$57,881
|
Agency
MBS
|
13
|
8,751,252
|
73,365
|
Other
investments
|
4
|
990,729
|
1,271
|
|
26
|
$20,466,623
|
$132,517
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
U.S.
GSE debt securities
|
4
|
$5,176,669
|
$73,331
|
Agency
MBS
|
15
|
10,704,717
|
115,458
|
Other
investments
|
2
|
493,548
|
2,452
|
|
21
|
$16,374,934
|
$191,241
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
Agency
MBS
|
3
|
$1,548,890
|
$15,410
|
The
unrealized losses for all periods presented were principally
attributable to changes in prevailing interest rates for similar
types of securities and not deterioration in the creditworthiness
of the issuer.
Management
evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least
on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market
conditions, or adverse developments relating to the issuer, warrant
such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time
and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the
carrying value, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects
of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to
retain its investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for
any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer's
financial condition, management considers whether the securities
are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether
downgrades by bond rating agencies or other adverse developments in
the status of the securities have occurred, and the results of
reviews of the issuer's financial condition. As of June 30, 2017,
there were no declines in the fair value of any of the securities
reflected in the table above that were deemed by management to be
other than temporary.
Note 5. Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit
Quality
The
composition of net loans as of the balance sheet dates was as
follows:
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
June 30,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial &
industrial
|
$79,361,739
|
$68,730,573
|
$72,878,438
|
Commercial real
estate
|
209,886,793
|
201,728,280
|
185,950,674
|
Residential real
estate - 1st lien
|
164,398,836
|
166,691,962
|
161,361,864
|
Residential real
estate - Junior (Jr) lien
|
42,166,407
|
42,927,335
|
44,078,168
|
Consumer
|
6,959,070
|
7,171,076
|
7,298,211
|
Gross
Loans
|
502,772,845
|
487,249,226
|
471,567,355
|
Deduct
(add):
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
5,374,378
|
5,278,445
|
5,077,420
|
Deferred net loan
costs
|
(323,371)
|
(310,130)
|
(320,298)
|
Net
Loans
|
$497,721,838
|
$482,280,911
|
$466,810,233
|
13
The
following is an age analysis of past due loans (including
non-accrual) as of the balance sheet dates, by portfolio
segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 Days or
|
|
|
90 Days
|
Total
|
|
|
Non-Accrual
|
More and
|
June 30, 2017
|
30-89 Days
|
or More
|
Past Due
|
Current
|
Total Loans
|
Loans
|
Accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial &
industrial
|
$121,737
|
$86,994
|
$208,731
|
$79,153,008
|
$79,361,739
|
$135,379
|
$0
|
Commercial real
estate
|
2,398,960
|
228,621
|
2,627,581
|
207,259,212
|
209,886,793
|
728,093
|
15,011
|
Residential real
estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 1st
lien
|
1,886,256
|
1,225,362
|
3,111,618
|
161,287,218
|
164,398,836
|
1,403,312
|
354,988
|
- Jr
lien
|
252,557
|
237,483
|
490,040
|
41,676,367
|
42,166,407
|
398,862
|
71,614
|
Consumer
|
54,835
|
0
|
54,835
|
6,904,235
|
6,959,070
|
0
|
0
|
|
$4,714,345
|
$1,778,460
|
$6,492,805
|
$496,280,040
|
$502,772,845
|
$2,665,646
|
$441,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 Days or
|
|
|
90 Days
|
Total
|
|
|
Non-Accrual
|
More and
|
December 31, 2016
|
30-89 Days
|
or More
|
Past Due
|
Current
|
Total Loans
|
Loans
|
Accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial &
industrial
|
$328,684
|
$26,042
|
$354,726
|
$68,375,847
|
$68,730,573
|
$143,128
|
$26,042
|
Commercial real
estate
|
824,836
|
222,738
|
1,047,574
|
200,680,706
|
201,728,280
|
765,584
|
0
|
Residential real
estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 1st
lien
|
4,881,496
|
1,723,688
|
6,605,184
|
160,086,778
|
166,691,962
|
1,227,220
|
1,068,083
|
- Jr
lien
|
984,849
|
116,849
|
1,101,698
|
41,825,637
|
42,927,335
|
338,602
|
27,905
|
Consumer
|
53,972
|
2,176
|
56,148
|
7,114,928
|
7,171,076
|
0
|
2,176
|
|
$7,073,837
|
$2,091,493
|
$9,165,330
|
$478,083,896
|
$487,249,226
|
$2,474,534
|
$1,124,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 Days or
|
|
|
90 Days
|
Total
|
|
|
Non-Accrual
|
More and
|
June 30, 2016
|
30-89 Days
|
or More
|
Past Due
|
Current
|
Total Loans
|
Loans
|
Accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial &
industrial
|
$62,073
|
$120,111
|
$182,184
|
$72,696,254
|
$72,878,438
|
$256,456
|
$120,111
|
Commercial real
estate
|
793,208
|
432,638
|
1,225,846
|
184,724,828
|
185,950,674
|
966,071
|
406,451
|
Residential real
estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 1st
lien
|
1,432,806
|
905,157
|
2,337,963
|
159,023,901
|
161,361,864
|
1,467,171
|
694,007
|
- Jr
lien
|
212,319
|
0
|
212,319
|
43,865,849
|
44,078,168
|
377,911
|
0
|
Consumer
|
83,668
|
0
|
83,668
|
7,214,543
|
7,298,211
|
0
|
0
|
|
$2,584,074
|
$1,457,906
|
$4,041,980
|
$467,525,375
|
$471,567,355
|
$3,067,609
|
$1,220,569
|
For
all loan segments, loans over 30 days past due are considered
delinquent.
As of
the balance sheet dates presented, residential mortgage loans in
process of foreclosure consisted of the following:
|
Number of
loans
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
7
|
$448,622
|
December 31,
2016
|
8
|
322,663
|
June
30, 2016
|
3
|
84,458
|
Allowance for loan losses
The
ALL is established through a provision for loan losses charged to
earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when
management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is
probable. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the
allowance.
14
Unsecured loans,
primarily consumer loans, are charged off when they become
uncollectible and no later than 120 days past due. Unsecured loans
to customers who subsequently file bankruptcy are charged off
within 30 days of receipt of the notification of filing or by the
end of the month in which the loans become 120 days past due,
whichever occurs first. For secured loans, both residential and
commercial, the potential loss on impaired loans is carried as a
loan loss reserve specific allocation; the loss portion is charged
off when collection of the full loan appears unlikely. The
unsecured portion of a real estate loan is that portion of the loan
exceeding the "fair value" of the collateral less the estimated
cost to sell. Value of the collateral is determined in accordance
with the Company’s appraisal policy. The unsecured portion of
an impaired real estate secured loan is charged off by the end of
the month in which the loan becomes 180 days past due.
As
described below, the allowance consists of general, specific and
unallocated components. However, the entire allowance is available
to absorb losses in the loan portfolio, regardless of specific,
general and unallocated components considered in determining the
amount of the allowance.
General component
The
general component of the ALL is based on historical loss experience
and various qualitative factors and is stratified by the following
loan segments: commercial and industrial, commercial real estate,
residential real estate 1st lien, residential real estate Jr lien
and consumer loans. The Company does not disaggregate its portfolio
segments further into classes.
Loss
ratios are calculated by loan segment for one year, two year, three
year, four year and five year look back periods. Management uses an
average of historical losses based on a time frame appropriate to
capture relevant loss data for each loan segment in the current
economic climate. During periods of economic stability, a
relatively longer period (e.g., five years) may be appropriate.
During periods of significant expansion or contraction, the Company
may appropriately shorten the historical time period. The Company
is currently using an extended look back period of five
years.
Qualitative
factors include the levels of and trends in delinquencies and
non-performing loans, levels of and trends in loan risk groups,
trends in volumes and terms of loans, effects of any changes in
loan related policies, experience, ability and the depth of
management, documentation and credit data exception levels,
national and local economic trends, external factors such as
competition and regulation and lastly, concentrations of credit
risk in a variety of areas, including portfolio product mix, the
level of loans to individual borrowers and their related interests,
loans to industry segments, and the geographic distribution of
commercial real estate loans. This evaluation is inherently
subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to
revision as more information becomes available.
The
qualitative factors are determined based on the various risk
characteristics of each loan segment. The Company has policies,
procedures and internal controls that management believes are
commensurate with the risk profile of each of these segments. Major
risk characteristics relevant to each portfolio segment are as
follows:
Commercial & Industrial –
Loans in this segment include commercial and industrial loans and
to a lesser extent loans to finance agricultural production.
Commercial loans are made to businesses and are generally secured
by assets of the business, including trade assets and equipment.
While not the primary collateral, in many cases these loans may
also be secured by the real estate of the business. Repayment is
expected from the cash flows of the business. A weakened economy,
soft consumer spending, unfavorable foreign trade conditions and
the rising cost of labor or raw materials are examples of issues
that can impact the credit quality in this segment.
Commercial Real Estate – Loans
in this segment are principally made to businesses and are
generally secured by either owner-occupied, or non-owner occupied
commercial real estate. A relatively small portion of this segment
includes farm loans secured by farm land and buildings. As with
commercial and industrial loans, repayment of owner-occupied
commercial real estate loans is expected from the cash flows of the
business and the segment would be impacted by the same risk factors
as commercial and industrial loans. The non-owner occupied
commercial real estate portion includes both residential and
commercial construction loans, vacant land and real estate
development loans, multi-family dwelling loans and commercial
rental property loans. Repayment of construction loans is expected
from permanent financing takeout; the Company generally requires a
commitment or eligibility for the take-out financing prior to
construction loan origination. Real estate development loans are
generally repaid from the sale of the subject real property as the
project progresses. Construction and development lending entail
additional risks, including the project exceeding budget, not being
constructed according to plans, not receiving permits, or the
pre-leasing or occupancy rate not meeting expectations. Repayment
of multi-family loans and commercial rental property loans is
expected from the cash flow generated by rental payments received
from the individuals or businesses occupying the real estate.
Commercial real estate loans are impacted by factors such as
competitive market forces, vacancy rates, cap rates, net operating
incomes, lease renewals and overall economic demand. In addition,
loans in the recreational and tourism sector can be affected by
weather conditions, such as unseasonably low winter snowfalls.
Commercial real estate lending also carries a higher degree of
environmental risk than other real estate lending.
15
Residential Real Estate – 1st Lien
– All loans in this segment are collateralized by
first mortgages on 1 – 4 family owner-occupied residential
real estate and repayment is dependent on the credit quality of the
individual borrower. The overall health of the economy, including
unemployment rates and housing prices, has an impact on the credit
quality of this segment.
Residential Real Estate – Jr Lien
– All loans in this segment are collateralized by
junior lien mortgages on 1 – 4 family residential real estate
and repayment is primarily dependent on the credit quality of the
individual borrower. The overall health of the economy, including
unemployment rates and housing prices, has an impact on the credit
quality of this segment.
Consumer – Loans in this segment
are made to individuals for consumer and household purposes. This
segment includes both loans secured by automobiles and other
consumer goods, as well as loans that are unsecured. This segment
also includes overdrafts, which are extensions of credit made to
both individuals and businesses to cover temporary shortages in
their deposit accounts and are generally unsecured. The Company
maintains policies restricting the size and term of these
extensions of credit. The overall health of the economy, including
unemployment rates, has an impact on the credit quality of this
segment.
Specific component
The
specific component of the ALL relates to loans that are impaired.
Impaired loans include all troubled debt restructurings (TDR) and
loans to a borrower that in the aggregate are greater than $100,000
and that are in non-accrual status. A specific allowance is
established for an impaired loan when its estimated impaired basis
is less than the total recorded investment in the loan. For all
loan segments, except consumer loans, a loan is considered impaired
when, based on current information and events, in
management’s estimation it is probable that the Company will
be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or
interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Factors considered by management in determining
impairment include payment status, collateral value and probability
of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.
Loans that experience insignificant or temporary payment delays and
payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.
Management evaluates the significance of payment delays and payment
shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all
of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower,
including the length and frequency of the delay, the reasons for
the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount
of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis, by either the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the
loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable
market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is
collateral dependent.
A TDR
occurs when the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to
the borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to
the borrower that would otherwise not be granted. TDRs may include
the transfer of assets to the Company in partial satisfaction of a
troubled loan, a modification of a loan’s terms, or a
combination of the two.
Large
groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively
evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not
separately identify individual consumer loans for impairment
evaluation, unless such loans are subject to a restructuring
agreement.
Unallocated component
An
unallocated component of the ALL is maintained to cover
uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of
probable losses. The unallocated component reflects
management’s estimate of the margin of imprecision inherent
in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for
estimating specific and general losses in the
portfolio.
ALL methodology changes implemented as of June 30,
2017
During
the second quarter of 2017, the Company transitioned to a software
solution for preparing the ALL calculation and related reports,
replacing previously used Excel spreadsheets. The software solution
provides the Company with stronger data integrity, ease and
efficiency in ALL preparation, and helps ready the Company for the
future transition to the CECL model.
During
the implementation and testing of the software, several changes to
the underlying ALL methodology were made. Those changes included
(i) removing the government guaranteed balances from the
calculation of the ALL for both the pooled loans and impaired
loans, (ii) treating all TDRs as impaired regardless of size, and
(iii) using a fixed look back period for historical losses based on
loss history and economic conditions versus applying the highest
look back period of the last 5 years. The Company has a solid
history of collection of government guarantees. The impact of not
reserving for government guaranteed balances reduced required
reserves by approximately $207,000. The change to the historical
loss methodology saw required reserves fall by approximately
$151,000. Management expects this change will eliminate sharp
increases or decreases in loss ratios brought on by isolated losses
rolling into or out of the look back period and is more reflective
of the Company’s loss history during a period of economic
stability. The inclusion of all TDRs in the impaired calculation
required the individual analysis of fifty-seven loans versus eleven
loans, with nineteen of the additional loans requiring specific
reserves ranging from $400 to $30,000, increasing required reserves
by approximately $111,000. Loans individually evaluated for
impairment under the new method, that would not have been
individually evaluated under the old method, amount to $4,493,655
at June 30, 2017. The ability to individually analyze a greater
number of loans is facilitated by the new software. The net impact
of the foregoing methodology changes reduced required reserves by
approximately $247,000 for the quarter ended June 30,
2017.
16
The
second quarter required reserves increased by $29,396. The general
component of the ALL associated with strong loan growth accounted
for approximately $165,000 in required reserves, while increases in
qualitative factors for delinquency/non-accrual and criticized and
classified loan levels for the commercial real estate and
residential real estate portfolios accounted for an increase of
$110,000. These increases were largely offset by the one-time
adjustment to reflect the methodology changes noted
above.
The
tables below summarize changes in the ALL and select loan
information, by portfolio segment, for the periods
indicated.
As of or for the three months ended June 30, 2017
|
|
|
Residential
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
& Industrial
|
Real Estate
|
1st Lien
|
Jr Lien
|
Consumer
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
$719,773
|
$2,521,121
|
$1,312,795
|
$370,454
|
$61,322
|
$272,975
|
$5,258,440
|
Charge-offs
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
(15,311)
|
(37,326)
|
0
|
(52,637)
|
Recoveries
|
1,422
|
230
|
3,981
|
60
|
12,882
|
0
|
18,575
|
Provision
(credit)
|
(25,532)
|
8,864
|
46,548
|
19,161
|
14,417
|
86,542
|
150,000
|
Ending
balance
|
$695,663
|
$2,530,215
|
$1,363,324
|
$374,364
|
$51,295
|
$359,517
|
$5,374,378
|
As of or for the six months ended June 30, 2017
|
|
|
Residential
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
& Industrial
|
Real Estate
|
1st Lien
|
Jr Lien
|
Consumer
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
$726,848
|
$2,496,085
|
$1,369,757
|
$371,176
|
$83,973
|
$230,606
|
$5,278,445
|
Charge-offs
|
0
|
(160,207)
|
(4,735)
|
(15,311)
|
(63,791)
|
0
|
(244,044)
|
Recoveries
|
4,318
|
230
|
10,217
|
120
|
25,092
|
0
|
39,977
|
Provision
(credit)
|
(35,503)
|
194,107
|
(11,915)
|
18,379
|
6,021
|
128,911
|
300,000
|
Ending
balance
|
$695,663
|
$2,530,215
|
$1,363,324
|
$374,364
|
$51,295
|
$359,517
|
$5,374,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated for
impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually
|
$0
|
$74,249
|
$154,760
|
$126,053
|
$0
|
$0
|
$355,062
|
Collectively
|
695,663
|
2,455,966
|
1,208,564
|
248,311
|
51,295
|
359,517
|
5,019,316
|
|
$695,663
|
$2,530,215
|
$1,363,324
|
$374,364
|
$51,295
|
$359,517
|
$5,374,378
|
|
|||||||
Loans
evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually
|
$135,379
|
$1,968,144
|
$3,577,837
|
$419,550
|
$0
|
|
$6,100,910
|
Collectively
|
79,226,360
|
207,918,649
|
160,820,999
|
41,746,857
|
6,959,070
|
|
496,671,935
|
|
$79,361,739
|
$209,886,793
|
$164,398,836
|
$42,166,407
|
$6,959,070
|
|
$502,772,845
|
17
As of or for the year ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
Residential
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
& Industrial
|
Real Estate
|
1st Lien
|
Jr Lien
|
Consumer
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
$712,902
|
$2,152,678
|
$1,368,028
|
$422,822
|
$75,689
|
$279,759
|
$5,011,878
|
Charge-offs
|
(49,009)
|
0
|
(244,149)
|
0
|
(15,404)
|
0
|
(308,562)
|
Recoveries
|
36,032
|
0
|
23,712
|
240
|
15,145
|
0
|
75,129
|
Provision
(credit)
|
26,923
|
343,407
|
222,166
|
(51,886)
|
8,543
|
(49,153)
|
500,000
|
Ending
balance
|
$726,848
|
$2,496,085
|
$1,369,757
|
$371,176
|
$83,973
|
$230,606
|
$5,278,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated for
impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually
|
$0
|
$86,400
|
$6,200
|
$114,800
|
$0
|
$0
|
$207,400
|
Collectively
|
726,848
|
2,409,685
|
1,363,557
|
256,376
|
83,973
|
230,606
|
5,071,045
|
|
$726,848
|
$2,496,085
|
$1,369,757
|
$371,176
|
$83,973
|
$230,606
|
$5,278,445
|
|
|||||||
Loans
evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually
|
$48,385
|
$687,495
|
$946,809
|
$224,053
|
$0
|
|
$1,906,742
|
Collectively
|
68,682,188
|
201,040,785
|
165,745,153
|
42,703,282
|
7,171,076
|
|
485,342,484
|
|
$68,730,573
|
$201,728,280
|
$166,691,962
|
$42,927,335
|
$7,171,076
|
|
$487,249,226
|
As of or for the three months ended June 30, 2016
|
|
|
Residential
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
& Industrial
|
Real Estate
|
1st Lien
|
Jr Lien
|
Consumer
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
|||||||
Beginning
balance
|
$730,375
|
$2,295,303
|
$1,338,927
|
$423,025
|
$58,456
|
$263,402
|
$5,109,488
|
Charge-offs
|
0
|
0
|
(192,237)
|
0
|
(7,298)
|
0
|
(199,535)
|
Recoveries
|
1,180
|
0
|
5,374
|
60
|
10,853
|
0
|
17,467
|
Provision
(credit)
|
93,687
|
21,663
|
142,208
|
(9,003)
|
18,549
|
(117,104)
|
150,000
|
Ending
balance
|
$825,242
|
$2,316,966
|
$1,294,272
|
$414,082
|
$80,560
|
$146,298
|
$5,077,420
|
As of or for the six months ended June 30, 2016
|
|
|
Residential
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
& Industrial
|
Real Estate
|
1st Lien
|
Jr Lien
|
Consumer
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
|||||||
Beginning
balance
|
$712,902
|
$2,152,678
|
$1,368,028
|
$422,822
|
$75,689
|
$279,759
|
$5,011,878
|
Charge-offs
|
(10,836)
|
0
|
(192,549)
|
0
|
(23,973)
|
0
|
(227,358)
|
Recoveries
|
20,475
|
0
|
5,686
|
120
|
16,619
|
0
|
42,900
|
Provision
(credit)
|
102,701
|
164,288
|
113,107
|
(8,860)
|
12,225
|
(133,461)
|
250,000
|
Ending
balance
|
$825,242
|
$2,316,966
|
$1,294,272
|
$414,082
|
$80,560
|
$146,298
|
$5,077,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
|||||||
Evaluated for
impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually
|
$0
|
$0
|
$59,900
|
$121,500
|
$0
|
$0
|
$181,400
|
Collectively
|
825,242
|
2,316,966
|
1,234,372
|
292,582
|
80,560
|
146,298
|
4,896,020
|
|
$825,242
|
$2,316,966
|
$1,294,272
|
$414,082
|
$80,560
|
$146,298
|
$5,077,420
|
|
|||||||
Loans
evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually
|
$191,919
|
$895,626
|
$1,990,686
|
$373,028
|
$0
|
|
$3,451,259
|
Collectively
|
72,686,519
|
185,055,048
|
159,371,178
|
43,705,140
|
7,298,211
|
|
468,116,096
|
|
$72,878,438
|
$185,950,674
|
$161,361,864
|
$44,078,168
|
$7,298,211
|
|
$471,567,355
|
18
Impaired loans, by
portfolio segment, were as follows:
|
As of June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
Average
|
Average
|
Interest
|
|
Recorded
|
Principal
|
Related
|
Recorded
|
Recorded
|
Income
|
|
Investment
|
Balance
|
Allowance
|
Investment (1)
|
Investment (2)
|
Recognized (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related allowance
recorded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
real estate
|
$210,499
|
$228,074
|
$74,249
|
$212,451
|
$215,053
|
$0
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
1,038,752
|
1,074,246
|
154,760
|
545,895
|
454,686
|
15,720
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
283,626
|
348,416
|
126,053
|
252,853
|
243,253
|
1,301
|
|
1,532,877
|
1,650,736
|
355,062
|
1,011,199
|
912,992
|
17,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
related allowance recorded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& industrial
|
135,379
|
218,023
|
|
91,882
|
77,383
|
0
|
Commercial
real estate
|
1,763,013
|
2,324,546
|
|
1,109,536
|
895,437
|
32,923
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
2,556,076
|
2,802,565
|
|
1,484,683
|
1,214,864
|
57,116
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
136,821
|
136,821
|
|
136,821
|
91,214
|
0
|
|
4,591,289
|
5,481,955
|
|
2,822,922
|
2,278,898
|
90,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$6,124,166
|
$7,132,691
|
$355,062
|
$3,834,121
|
$3,191,890
|
$107,060
|
(1)
For the three months ended June 30, 2017
(2)
For the six months ended June 30, 2017
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
2016
|
||
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
Average
|
|
Recorded
|
Principal
|
Related
|
Recorded
|
|
Investment
|
Balance
|
Allowance
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related allowance
recorded
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
real estate
|
$220,257
|
$232,073
|
$86,400
|
$89,664
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
271,962
|
275,118
|
6,200
|
350,709
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
224,053
|
284,342
|
114,800
|
241,965
|
|
716,272
|
791,533
|
207,400
|
682,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
related allowance recorded
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& industrial
|
48,385
|
62,498
|
|
183,925
|
Commercial
real estate
|
467,238
|
521,991
|
|
1,059,542
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
674,847
|
893,741
|
|
877,237
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
0
|
0
|
|
15,888
|
|
1,190,470
|
1,478,230
|
|
2,136,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,906,742
|
$2,269,763
|
$207,400
|
$2,818,930
|
19
|
As of June 30, 2016
|
|
|
||
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
Average
|
Average
|
|
Recorded
|
Principal
|
Related
|
Recorded
|
Recorded
|
|
Investment
|
Balance
|
Allowance
|
Investment(1)
|
Investment(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related allowance
recorded
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
$871,603
|
$1,027,861
|
$59,900
|
$435,802
|
$209,078
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
293,587
|
348,757
|
121,500
|
262,589
|
151,836
|
|
1,165,190
|
1,376,618
|
181,400
|
698,391
|
360,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
related allowance recorded
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& industrial
|
191,919
|
263,839
|
|
198,137
|
136,542
|
Commercial
real estate
|
895,626
|
953,181
|
|
901,468
|
870,937
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
1,119,083
|
1,319,907
|
|
918,378
|
616,555
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
79,441
|
87,675
|
|
39,721
|
15,888
|
|
2,286,069
|
2,624,602
|
|
2,057,704
|
1,639,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3,451,259
|
$4,001,220
|
$181,400
|
$2,756,095
|
$2,000,836
|
(1)
For the three months ended June 30, 2016
(2)
For the six months ended June 30, 2016
Interest income
recognized on impaired loans was immaterial for the December 31,
2016 and June 30, 2016 periods presented.
For
all loan segments, the accrual of interest is discontinued when a
loan is specifically determined to be impaired or when the loan is
delinquent 90 days and management believes, after considering
collection efforts and other factors, that the borrower's financial
condition is such that collection of interest is considered by
management to be doubtful. Any unpaid interest previously accrued
on those loans is reversed from income. Interest income is
generally not recognized on specific impaired loans unless the
likelihood of further loss is considered by management to be
remote. Interest payments received on impaired loans are generally
applied as a reduction of the loan principal balance. Loans are
returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest
amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments
are considered by management to be reasonably assured.
Credit Quality Grouping
In
developing the ALL, management uses credit quality grouping to help
evaluate trends in credit quality. The Company groups credit risk
into Groups A, B and C. The manner the Company utilizes to assign
risk grouping is driven by loan purpose. Commercial purpose loans
are individually risk graded while the retail portion of the
portfolio is generally grouped by delinquency pool.
Group A loans - Acceptable
Risk –
are loans that are expected to perform as agreed under their
respective terms. Such loans carry a normal level of risk that does
not require management attention beyond that warranted by the loan
or loan relationship characteristics, such as loan size or
relationship size. Group A loans include commercial purpose loans
that are individually risk rated and retail loans that are rated by
pool. Group A retail loans include performing consumer and
residential real estate loans. Residential real estate loans are
loans to individuals secured by 1-4 family homes, including first
mortgages, home equity and home improvement loans. Loan balances
fully secured by deposit accounts or that are fully guaranteed by
the Federal Government are considered acceptable risk.
Group B loans – Management
Involved - are loans that require greater attention than the
acceptable loans in Group A. Characteristics of such loans may
include, but are not limited to, borrowers that are experiencing
negative operating trends such as reduced sales or margins,
borrowers that have exposure to adverse market conditions such as
increased competition or regulatory burden, or borrowers that have
had unexpected or adverse changes in management. These loans have a
greater likelihood of migrating to an unacceptable risk level if
these characteristics are left unchecked. Group B is limited to
commercial purpose loans that are individually risk
rated.
20
Group C loans – Unacceptable
Risk – are loans that have distinct shortcomings that
require a greater degree of management attention. Examples of these
shortcomings include a borrower's inadequate capacity to service
debt, poor operating performance, or insolvency. These loans are
more likely to result in repayment through collateral liquidation.
Group C loans range from those that are likely to sustain some loss
if the shortcomings are not corrected, to those for which loss is
imminent and non-accrual treatment is warranted. Group C loans
include individually rated commercial purpose loans and retail
loans adversely rated in accordance with the Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council’s Uniform Retail Credit
Classification Policy. Group C retail loans include 1-4 family
residential real estate loans and home equity loans past due 90
days or more with loan-to-value ratios greater than 60%, home
equity loans 90 days or more past due where the Bank does not hold
first mortgage, irrespective of loan-to-value, loans in bankruptcy
where repayment is likely but not yet established, and consumer
loans that are 90 days or more past due.
Commercial purpose
loan ratings are assigned by the commercial account officer; for
larger and more complex commercial loans, the credit rating is a
collaborative assignment by the lender and the credit analyst. The
credit risk rating is based on the borrower's expected performance,
i.e., the likelihood that the borrower will be able to service its
obligations in accordance with the loan terms. Credit risk ratings
are meant to measure risk versus simply record history. Assessment
of expected future payment performance requires consideration of
numerous factors. While past performance is part of the overall
evaluation, expected performance is based on an analysis of the
borrower's financial strength, and historical and projected factors
such as size and financing alternatives, capacity and cash flow,
balance sheet and income statement trends, the quality and
timeliness of financial reporting, and the quality of the
borrower’s management. Other factors influencing the credit
risk rating to a lesser degree include collateral coverage and
control, guarantor strength and commitment, documentation,
structure and covenants and industry conditions. There are
uncertainties inherent in this process.
Credit
risk ratings are dynamic and require updating whenever relevant
information is received. The risk ratings of larger or more complex
loans, and Group B and C rated loans, are assessed at the time of
their respective annual reviews, during quarterly updates, in
action plans or at any other time that relevant information
warrants update. Lenders are required to make immediate disclosure
to the Chief Credit Officer of any known increase in loan risk,
even if considered temporary in nature.
The
risk ratings within the loan portfolio, by segment, as of the
balance sheet dates were as follows:
As of June 30, 2017
|
|
|
Residential
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
& Industrial
|
Real Estate
|
1st Lien
|
Jr Lien
|
Consumer
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
A
|
$75,971,101
|
$199,768,226
|
$162,224,767
|
$41,503,823
|
$6,959,070
|
$486,426,987
|
Group
B
|
520,555
|
1,169,093
|
0
|
162,321
|
0
|
1,851,969
|
Group
C
|
2,870,083
|
8,949,474
|
2,174,069
|
500,263
|
0
|
14,493,889
|
|
$79,361,739
|
$209,886,793
|
$164,398,836
|
$42,166,407
|
$6,959,070
|
$502,772,845
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
Residential
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
& Industrial
|
Real Estate
|
1st Lien
|
Jr Lien
|
Consumer
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
A
|
$67,297,983
|
$191,755,393
|
$164,708,778
|
$42,289,062
|
$7,168,901
|
$473,220,117
|
Group
B
|
512,329
|
2,971,364
|
0
|
169,054
|
0
|
3,652,747
|
Group
C
|
920,261
|
7,001,523
|
1,983,184
|
469,219
|
2,175
|
10,376,362
|
|
$68,730,573
|
$201,728,280
|
$166,691,962
|
$42,927,335
|
$7,171,076
|
$487,249,226
|
21
As of June 30, 2016
|
|
|
Residential
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
& Industrial
|
Real Estate
|
1st Lien
|
Jr Lien
|
Consumer
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
A
|
$70,175,375
|
$173,220,709
|
$158,425,776
|
$43,400,606
|
$7,298,211
|
$452,520,677
|
Group
B
|
1,764,165
|
4,318,817
|
587,586
|
156,846
|
0
|
6,827,414
|
Group
C
|
938,898
|
8,411,148
|
2,348,502
|
520,716
|
0
|
12,219,264
|
|
$72,878,438
|
$185,950,674
|
$161,361,864
|
$44,078,168
|
$7,298,211
|
$471,567,355
|
Modifications of Loans and TDRs
A loan is classified as a TDR if, for economic or legal reasons
related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Company
grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise
consider.
The Company is deemed to have granted such a concession if it has
modified a troubled loan in any of the following ways:
●
Reduced accrued interest;
●
Reduced the original contractual interest rate to a rate that is
below the current market rate for the borrower;
●
Converted a variable-rate loan to a fixed-rate loan;
●
Extended the term of the loan beyond an insignificant
delay;
●
Deferred or forgiven principal in an amount greater than three
months of payments; or
●
Performed a refinancing and deferred or forgiven principal on the
original loan.
An insignificant delay or insignificant shortfall in the amount of
payments typically would not require the loan to be accounted for
as a TDR. However, pursuant to regulatory guidance, any payment
delay longer than three months is generally not considered
insignificant. Management’s assessment of whether a
concession has been granted also takes into account payments
expected to be received from third parties, including third-party
guarantors, provided that the third party has the ability to
perform on the guarantee.
The Company’s TDRs are principally a result of extending loan
repayment terms to relieve cash flow difficulties. The Company has
only, on a limited basis, reduced interest rates for borrowers
below the current market rate for the borrower. The Company has not
forgiven principal or reduced accrued interest within the terms of
original restructurings, nor has it converted variable rate terms
to fixed rate terms. However, the Company evaluates each TDR
situation on its own merits and does not foreclose the granting of
any particular type of concession.
There
were no new TDRs for the three months ended June 30, 2017. New
TDRs, by portfolio segment, during the periods presented were as
follows:
Six
months ended June 30, 2017
|
|
Pre-
|
Post-
|
|
|
Modification
|
Modification
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
Outstanding
|
|
Number
of
|
Recorded
|
Recorded
|
|
Contracts
|
Investment
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial &
industrial
|
1
|
$41,857
|
$57,418
|
22
Year ended December 31, 2016
|
|
Pre-
|
Post-
|
|
|
Modification
|
Modification
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
Outstanding
|
|
Number of
|
Recorded
|
Recorded
|
|
Contracts
|
Investment
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real
estate - 1st lien
|
8
|
$572,418
|
$598,030
|
Residential real
estate - Jr lien
|
2
|
62,819
|
64,977
|
|
10
|
$635,237
|
$663,007
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2016
|
Six months ended June 30, 2016
|
||||
|
|
Pre-
|
Post-
|
|
Pre-
|
Post-
|
|
|
Modification
|
Modification
|
|
Modification
|
Modification
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
Outstanding
|
|
Outstanding
|
Outstanding
|
|
Number of
|
Recorded
|
Recorded
|
Number of
|
Recorded
|
Recorded
|
|
Contracts
|
Investment
|
Investment
|
Contracts
|
Investment
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real
estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 1st
lien
|
0
|
$0
|
$0
|
5
|
$395,236
|
$412,923
|
- Jr
lien
|
1
|
52,558
|
54,637
|
2
|
62,819
|
64,977
|
|
1
|
$52,558
|
$54,637
|
7
|
$458,055
|
$477,900
|
The
TDR’s for which there was a payment default during the twelve
month periods presented were as follows:
Twelve months ended June 30, 2017
|
Number of
|
Recorded
|
|
Contracts
|
Investment
|
Residential real
estate – 1st lien
|
2
|
$80,485
|
Twelve months ended December 31, 2016
|
Number of
|
Recorded
|
|
Contracts
|
Investment
|
Residential real
estate - 1st lien
|
2
|
$93,230
|
Residential real
estate - Jr lien
|
1
|
54,557
|
|
3
|
$147,787
|
Twelve
months ended June 30, 2016
|
Number of
|
Recorded
|
|
Contracts
|
Investment
|
Commercial &
industrial
|
1
|
$71,808
|
Commercial real
estate
|
2
|
373,767
|
Residential real
estate - 1st lien
|
1
|
58,792
|
|
4
|
$504,367
|
TDRs
are treated as other impaired loans and carry individual specific
reserves with respect to the calculation of the ALL. These loans
are categorized as non-performing, may be past due, and are
generally adversely risk rated. The TDRs that have defaulted under
their restructured terms are generally in collection status and
their reserve is typically calculated using the fair value of
collateral method.
23
The
specific allowances related to TDRs as of the balance sheet dates
are presented in the table below.
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
June 30,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2016
|
Specific Allocation
|
$237,551
|
$92,600
|
$68,500
|
As of
the balance sheet dates, the Company evaluates whether it is
contractually committed to lend additional funds to debtors with
impaired, non-accrual or modified loans. The Company is
contractually committed to lend on one Small Business
Administration guaranteed line of credit to a borrower whose
lending relationship was previously restructured.
Note 6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
As a
result of a merger with LyndonBank on December 31, 2007, the
Company recorded goodwill amounting to $11,574,269. The goodwill is
not amortizable and is not deductible for tax
purposes.
The
Company also initially recorded $4,161,000 of acquired identified
intangible assets in the LyndonBank merger, representing the core
deposit intangible which is subject to amortization as a
non-interest expense over a ten year period. The accumulated
amortization expense was $4,024,659 and $3,751,964 as of June 30,
2017 and 2016, respectively.
Amortization
expense for the core deposit intangible for the first six months of
2017 and 2016 was $136,350. The future amortization expense related
to the remaining core deposit intangible is $136,341 and will be
fully expensed in 2017.
Management
evaluates goodwill for impairment annually and the core deposit
intangible for impairment if conditions warrant. As of the date of
the most recent evaluation (December 31, 2016), management
concluded that no impairment existed in either
category.
Note 7. Fair Value
Certain assets and
liabilities are recorded at fair value to provide additional
insight into the Company’s quality of earnings. The fair
values of some of these assets and liabilities are measured on a
recurring basis while others are measured on a non-recurring basis,
with the determination based upon applicable existing accounting
pronouncements. For example, securities available-for-sale are
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Other assets, such as
MSRs, loans held-for-sale, impaired loans, and OREO are recorded at
fair value on a non-recurring basis using the lower of cost or
market methodology to determine impairment of individual assets.
The Company groups assets and liabilities which are recorded at
fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the
assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the
assumptions used to determine fair value. The level within the fair
value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement (with Level 1 considered
highest and Level 3 considered lowest). A brief description of each
level follows.
Level
1
Quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets
and liabilities include debt and equity securities and derivative
contracts that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as
U.S. Treasury, other U.S. Government debt securities that are
highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter
markets.
Level
2
Observable inputs
other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets
and liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by
observable market data for substantially the full term of the
assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt
securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than
exchange-traded instruments and derivative contracts whose value is
determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in
the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by
observable market data. This category generally includes MSRs,
impaired loans and OREO.
Level
3
Unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose
value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow
methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for
which the determination of fair value requires significant
management judgment or estimation.
The
following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in
estimating its fair value measurements and
disclosures:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts
reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents
approximate their fair values. As such, the Company classifies
these financial instruments as Level 1.
24
Securities AFS and HTM: Fair
value measurement is based upon quoted prices for similar assets,
if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are
measured using matrix pricing models, or other model-based
valuation techniques requiring observable inputs other than quoted
prices such as yield curves, prepayment speeds and default rates.
Level 1 securities would include U.S. Treasury securities that are
traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets.
Level 2 securities include federal agency securities and securities
of local municipalities.
Restricted equity
securities: Restricted equity
securities are comprised of Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (FRBB)
stock and Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (FHLBB) stock. These
securities are carried at cost, which is believed to approximate
fair value, based on the redemption provisions of the FRBB and the
FHLBB. The stock is nonmarketable, and redeemable at par value,
subject to certain conditions. The Company classifies these
securities as Level 2.
Loans and loans
held-for-sale: For variable-rate loans
that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit
risk, fair values are based on carrying amounts. The fair values
for other loans (for example, fixed rate residential, commercial
real estate, and rental property mortgage loans, and commercial and
industrial loans) are estimated using discounted cash flow
analyses, based on interest rates currently being offered for loans
with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Loan
fair value estimates include judgments regarding future expected
loss experience and risk characteristics. Loan impairment is deemed
to exist when full repayment of principal and interest according to
the contractual terms of the loan is no longer probable. Impaired
loans are reported based on one of three measures: the present
value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s
effective interest rate; the loan’s observable market price;
or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral
dependent. If the fair value is less than an impaired loan’s
recorded investment, an impairment loss is recognized as part of
the ALL. Accordingly, certain impaired loans may be subject to
measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Management has
estimated the fair values of these assets using Level 2 inputs,
such as the fair value of collateral based on independent
third-party appraisals for collateral-dependent loans. All other
loans are valued using Level 3 inputs.
The
fair value of loans held-for-sale is based upon an actual purchase
and sale agreement between the Company and an independent market
participant. The sale is executed within a reasonable period
following quarter end at the stated fair value.
MSRs: MSRs represent the
value associated with servicing residential mortgage loans.
Servicing assets and servicing liabilities are reported using the
amortization method and compared to fair value for impairment. In
evaluating the carrying values of MSRs, the Company obtains third
party valuations based on loan level data including note rate, and
the type and term of the underlying loans. The Company classifies
MSRs as non-recurring Level 2.
OREO: Real estate acquired
through or in lieu of foreclosure and bank properties no longer
used as bank premises are initially recorded at fair value. The
fair value of OREO is based on property appraisals and an analysis
of similar properties currently available. The Company records OREO
as non-recurring Level 2.
Deposits, repurchase agreements and borrowed
funds: The fair values disclosed
for demand deposits (for example, checking accounts and savings
accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand
at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The
carrying value of repurchase agreements approximates fair value due
to their short term. The fair values for certificates of deposit
and borrowed funds are estimated using a discounted cash flow
calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on
certificates and indebtedness to a schedule of aggregated
contractual maturities on such time deposits and indebtedness. The
Company classifies deposits, repurchase agreements and borrowed
funds as Level 2.
Capital lease
obligations: Fair value is determined using a
discounted cash flow calculation using current rates. Based on
current rates, carrying value approximates fair value. The Company
classifies these obligations as Level 2.
Junior subordinated
debentures: Fair value is estimated using current
rates for debentures of similar maturity. The Company classifies
these instruments as Level 2.
Accrued interest: The carrying amounts of
accrued interest approximate their fair values. The Company
classifies accrued interest as Level 2.
25
Off-balance-sheet credit related
instruments: Commitments to extend
credit are evaluated and fair value is estimated using the fees
currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into
account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present
credit-worthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan
commitments, fair value also considers the difference between
current levels of interest rates and the committed
rates.
FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 825 “Financial
Instruments”, requires disclosures of fair value information
about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the
balance sheet, if the fair values can be reasonably determined.
Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices.
However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for
the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where
quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on
estimates using present value or other valuation techniques using
observable inputs when available. Those techniques are
significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the
discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the
fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement
of the instrument. Topic 825 excludes certain financial instruments
and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements.
Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not
necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the
Company.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring
Basis
Assets
measured at fair value on a recurring basis and reflected in the
consolidated balance sheets at the dates presented, segregated by
fair value hierarchy, are summarized below:
June 30, 2017
|
Level 2
|
Assets: (market
approach)
|
|
U.S.
GSE debt securities
|
$18,313,188
|
Agency
MBS
|
13,078,619
|
Other
investments
|
4,242,909
|
|
$35,634,716
|
December 31, 2016
|
Level 2
|
Assets: (market
approach)
|
|
U.S.
GSE debt securities
|
$17,317,328
|
Agency
MBS
|
13,154,228
|
Other
investments
|
3,243,495
|
|
$33,715,051
|
June 30, 2016
|
Level 2
|
Assets: (market
approach)
|
|
U.S.
GSE debt securities
|
$11,890,890
|
Agency
MBS
|
13,151,647
|
Other
investments
|
3,037,138
|
|
$28,079,675
|
There
were no Level 1 or Level 3 assets or liabilities measured on a
recurring basis as of the balance sheet dates
presented.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring
Basis
The
following table includes assets measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis that have had a fair value adjustment since
their initial recognition. Impaired loans measured at fair value
only include impaired loans with a related specific ALL and are
presented net of specific allowances as disclosed in Note
5.
26
Assets
measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and reflected in
the consolidated balance sheets at the dates presented, segregated
by fair value hierarchy, are summarized below:
June 30, 2017
|
Level 2
|
Assets: (market
approach)
|
|
MSRs
(1)
|
$1,151,241
|
Impaired loans,
net of related allowance
|
25,050
|
OREO
|
343,928
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
Level 2
|
Assets: (market
approach)
|
|
MSRs
(1)
|
$1,210,695
|
Impaired loans,
net of related allowance
|
508,872
|
OREO
|
394,000
|
June 30, 2016
|
Level 2
|
Assets: (market
approach)
|
|
MSRs
(1)
|
$1,264,148
|
Impaired loans,
net of related allowance
|
983,790
|
OREO
|
409,000
|
(1)
Represents MSRs at lower of cost or fair value, including MSRs
deemed to be impaired and for which a valuation allowance was
established to carry at fair value as of the balance sheet dates
presented.
There
were no Level 1 or Level 3 assets or liabilities measured on a
non-recurring basis as of the balance sheet dates
presented.
27
The
estimated fair values of commitments to extend credit and letters
of credit were immaterial as of the dates presented in the tables
below. The estimated fair values of the Company's financial
instruments were as follows:
June 30, 2017
|
|
Fair
|
Fair
|
Fair
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
Value
|
Value
|
Value
|
Value
|
|
Amount
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
||||
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$37,026
|
$37,026
|
$0
|
$0
|
$37,026
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
36,418
|
0
|
37,065
|
0
|
37,065
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
35,635
|
0
|
35,635
|
0
|
35,635
|
Restricted equity
securities
|
1,943
|
0
|
1,943
|
0
|
1,943
|
Loans
and loans held-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& industrial
|
78,609
|
0
|
0
|
79,311
|
79,311
|
Commercial
real estate
|
207,207
|
0
|
0
|
208,632
|
208,632
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
163,489
|
0
|
25
|
166,085
|
166,110
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
41,762
|
0
|
0
|
42,199
|
42,199
|
Consumer
|
6,903
|
0
|
0
|
7,147
|
7,147
|
MSRs
(1)
|
1,151
|
0
|
1,341
|
0
|
1,341
|
Accrued interest
receivable
|
1,746
|
0
|
1,746
|
0
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
deposits
|
479,131
|
0
|
478,412
|
0
|
478,412
|
Brokered
deposits
|
54,176
|
0
|
54,177
|
0
|
54,177
|
Short-term
borrowings
|
10,000
|
0
|
10,000
|
0
|
10,000
|
Long-term
borrowings
|
3,550
|
0
|
3,205
|
0
|
3,205
|
Repurchase
agreements
|
28,863
|
0
|
28,863
|
0
|
28,863
|
Capital lease
obligations
|
435
|
0
|
435
|
0
|
435
|
Subordinated
debentures
|
12,887
|
0
|
12,844
|
0
|
12,844
|
Accrued interest
payable
|
125
|
0
|
125
|
0
|
125
|
(1)
Reported fair value represents all MSRs for loans serviced by the
Company at June 30, 2017, regardless of carrying
amount.
28
December 31, 2016
|
|
Fair
|
Fair
|
Fair
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
Value
|
Value
|
Value
|
Value
|
|
Amount
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
||||
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$29,614
|
$29,614
|
$0
|
$0
|
$29,614
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
49,887
|
0
|
51,035
|
0
|
51,035
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
33,715
|
0
|
33,715
|
0
|
33,715
|
Restricted equity
securities
|
2,756
|
0
|
2,756
|
0
|
2,756
|
Loans
and loans held-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& industrial
|
67,972
|
0
|
48
|
68,727
|
68,775
|
Commercial
real estate
|
199,136
|
0
|
601
|
201,560
|
202,161
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
165,243
|
0
|
941
|
166,858
|
167,799
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
42,536
|
0
|
109
|
42,948
|
43,057
|
Consumer
|
7,084
|
0
|
0
|
7,371
|
7,371
|
MSRs(1)
|
1,211
|
0
|
1,302
|
0
|
1,302
|
Accrued interest
receivable
|
1,819
|
0
|
1,819
|
0
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
deposits
|
470,002
|
0
|
469,323
|
0
|
469,323
|
Brokered
deposits
|
34,733
|
0
|
34,745
|
0
|
34,745
|
Short-term
borrowings
|
30,000
|
0
|
30,000
|
0
|
30,000
|
Long-term
borrowings
|
1,550
|
0
|
1,376
|
0
|
1,376
|
Repurchase
agreements
|
30,423
|
0
|
30,423
|
0
|
30,423
|
Capital lease
obligations
|
483
|
0
|
483
|
0
|
483
|
Subordinated
debentures
|
12,887
|
0
|
12,849
|
0
|
12,849
|
Accrued interest
payable
|
73
|
0
|
73
|
0
|
73
|
(1)
Reported fair value represents all MSRs for loans serviced by the
Company at December 31, 2016, regardless of carrying
amount.
29
June 30, 2016
|
|
Fair
|
Fair
|
Fair
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
Value
|
Value
|
Value
|
Value
|
|
Amount
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
||||
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$24,334
|
$24,334
|
$0
|
$0
|
$24,334
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
34,013
|
0
|
34,682
|
0
|
34,682
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
28,080
|
0
|
28,080
|
0
|
28,080
|
Restricted equity
securities
|
2,610
|
0
|
2,610
|
0
|
2,610
|
Loans
and loans held-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& industrial
|
72,030
|
0
|
192
|
73,096
|
73,288
|
Commercial
real estate
|
183,577
|
0
|
896
|
188,112
|
189,008
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
160,599
|
0
|
1,931
|
162,930
|
164,861
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
43,650
|
0
|
252
|
44,080
|
44,332
|
Consumer
|
7,215
|
0
|
0
|
7,533
|
7,533
|
Mortgage servicing
rights
|
1,264
|
0
|
1,333
|
0
|
1,333
|
Accrued interest
receivable
|
1,558
|
0
|
1,558
|
0
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
deposits
|
448,752
|
0
|
449,061
|
0
|
449,061
|
Brokered
deposits
|
20,231
|
0
|
20,237
|
0
|
20,237
|
Short-term
borrowings
|
30,000
|
0
|
30,000
|
0
|
30,000
|
Long-term
borrowings
|
350
|
0
|
328
|
0
|
328
|
Repurchase
agreements
|
26,837
|
0
|
26,837
|
0
|
26,837
|
Capital lease
obligations
|
515
|
0
|
515
|
0
|
515
|
Subordinated
debentures
|
12,887
|
0
|
12,853
|
0
|
12,853
|
Accrued interest
payable
|
61
|
0
|
61
|
0
|
61
|
(1)
Reported fair value represents all MSRs for loans serviced by the
Company at June 30, 2016, regardless of carrying
amount.
Note 8. Loan Servicing
The
following table shows the changes in the carrying amount of the
mortgage servicing rights, included in other assets in the
consolidated balance sheets, for the periods
indicated:
|
Six Months Ended
|
Year Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
beginning of year
|
$1,210,695
|
$1,293,079
|
$1,293,079
|
Mortgage
servicing rights capitalized
|
54,603
|
176,705
|
98,054
|
Mortgage
servicing rights amortized
|
(114,057)
|
(266,603)
|
(134,499)
|
Change
in valuation allowance
|
0
|
7,514
|
7,514
|
Balance at end of
period
|
$1,151,241
|
$1,210,695
|
$1,264,148
|
Note 9. Legal Proceedings
In the
normal course of business, the Company and its subsidiary are
involved in litigation that is considered incidental to their
business. Management does not expect that any such litigation will
be material to the Company's consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.
Note 10. Subsequent Event
The
Company has evaluated events and transactions through the date that
the financial statements were issued for potential recognition or
disclosure in these financial statements, as required by US GAAP.
On June 15, 2017, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.17 per
common share payable August 1, 2017 to shareholders of record as of
July 15, 2017. This dividend, amounting to $862,376, was accrued at
June 30, 2017.
30
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Period Ended June 30, 2017
The
following discussion analyzes the consolidated financial condition
of Community Bancorp. (the Company) and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Community National Bank (the Bank), as of June 30,
2017, December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, and its consolidated
results of operations for the six-month interim period presented.
Under applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) the Company is eligible for relief from certain
disclosure requirements available to smaller reporting companies
until it files its first quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
2018.
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and
related notes contained in its 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the SEC.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations (MD&A) contains certain forward-looking
statements about the results of operations, financial condition and
business of the Company and its subsidiary. Words used in the
discussion below such as "believes," "expects," "anticipates,"
"intends," "estimates," "plans," "predicts," or similar
expressions, indicate that management of the Company is making
forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance. They
necessarily involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Future
results of the Company may differ materially from those expressed
in these forward-looking statements. Examples of forward looking
statements included in this discussion include, but are not limited
to, estimated contingent liability related to assumptions made
within the asset/liability management process, management's
expectations as to the future interest rate environment and the
Company's related liquidity level, credit risk expectations
relating to the Company's loan portfolio and its participation in
the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (FHLBB) Mortgage Partnership
Finance (MPF) program, and management's general outlook for the
future performance of the Company or the local or national economy.
Although forward-looking statements are based on management's
current expectations and estimates, many of the factors that could
influence or determine actual results are unpredictable and not
within the Company's control. Readers are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on such statements as they speak only as of the date
they are made. The Company does not undertake, and disclaims any
obligation, to revise or update any forward-looking statements to
reflect the occurrence or anticipated occurrence of events or
circumstances after the date of this Report, except as required by
applicable law. The Company claims the protection of the safe
harbor for forward-looking statements provided in the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Factors that may
cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated
by these forward-looking statements include, among others, the
following possibilities: (1) general economic conditions, either
nationally, regionally or locally deteriorate, resulting in a
decline in credit quality or a diminished demand for the Company's
products and services; (2) competitive pressures increase among
financial service providers in the Company's northern New England
market area or in the financial services industry generally,
including competitive pressures from non-bank financial service
providers, from increasing consolidation and integration of
financial service providers, and from changes in technology and
delivery systems; (3) interest rates change in such a way as to
negatively affect the Company's net income, asset valuations or
margins; (4) changes in laws or government rules, including the
rules of the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or the
way in which courts or government agencies interpret or implement
those laws or rules, increase our costs of doing business, causing
us to limit or change our product offerings or pricing, or
otherwise adversely affect the Company's business; (5) changes in
federal or state tax policy; (6) changes in the level of
nonperforming assets and charge-offs; (7) changes in estimates of
future reserve requirements based upon relevant regulatory and
accounting requirements; (8) changes in consumer and business
spending, borrowing and savings habits; (9) reductions in deposit
levels, which necessitate increased borrowings to fund loans and
investments; (10) the geographic concentration of the
Company’s loan portfolio and deposit base; (11) losses due to
the fraudulent or negligent conduct of third parties, including the
Company’s service providers, customers and employees; (12)
the effect of changes to the calculation of the Company’s
regulatory capital ratios which began in 2015 under the Basel III
capital framework and which, among other things, requires
additional regulatory capital, and changes the framework for
risk-weighting of certain assets; (13) the effect of and changes in
the United States monetary and fiscal policies, including the
interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) and its
regulation of the money supply; and (14) adverse changes in the
credit rating of U.S. government debt.
31
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Under
SEC Regulation G, public companies making disclosures containing
financial measures that are not in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States (US GAAP or
GAAP) must also disclose, along with each non-GAAP financial
measure, certain additional information, including a reconciliation
of the non-GAAP financial measure to the closest comparable GAAP
financial measure, as well as a statement of the company’s
reasons for utilizing the non-GAAP financial measure. The SEC has
exempted from the definition of non-GAAP financial measures certain
commonly used financial measures that are not based on GAAP.
However, three non-GAAP financial measures commonly used by
financial institutions, namely tax-equivalent net interest income
and tax-equivalent net interest margin (as presented in the tables
in the section labeled Interest Income Versus Interest Expense (Net
Interest Income)) and core earnings (as defined and discussed in
the Results of Operations section), have not been specifically
exempted by the SEC, and may therefore constitute non-GAAP
financial measures under Regulation G. We are unable to state with
certainty whether the SEC would regard those measures as subject to
Regulation G.
Management
believes that these non-GAAP financial measures are useful in
evaluating the Company’s financial performance and facilitate
comparisons with the performance of other financial institutions.
However, that information should be considered supplemental in
nature and not as a substitute for related financial information
prepared in accordance with GAAP.
OVERVIEW
The
Company’s consolidated assets on June 30, 2017 were
$648,174,342, an increase of $10,520,677, or 1.7%, from December
31, 2016 and an increase of $51,966,609, or 8.7%, from June 30,
2016. Net loans increased $15,440,927, or 3.2%, since December 31,
2016 and $30,911,605, or 6.6%, since June 30, 2016. The year over
year increase in the loan portfolio is attributable to growth in
commercial loans and was funded primarily through an increase in
deposit accounts and wholesale funding in the form of purchased
deposits. In the year to date comparison, while net loans increased
3.2%, this was offset by a decrease in the held-to-maturity
portfolio due to the maturing of tax anticipation loans with the
local school districts on June 30, 2017. The decrease in municipal
investments is cyclical in nature as June 30 is the end of the
annual municipal finance cycle for school districts in Vermont. Tax
anticipation loans for fiscal year 2018 were funded on July 1, 2017
in an amount comparable to the balances that matured on June
30.
Total
deposits increased $28,572,247, or 5.7%, since December 31, 2016
due to an $11.2 million, or 12.9%, increase in savings accounts,
and a $13.9 million, or 14.3%, increase in other time deposits. In
the year over year comparison, deposits increased $64,324,123, or
13.7%. Core deposits saw increases in all areas in the year over
year comparison, while a decrease is noted in money market
accounts, year to date, due to the seasonal runoff of municipal
deposits. Some of the increase in time deposits in both comparison
periods is attributable to the Company’s use of brokered
deposits, both the national certificate of deposit (CD) market and
the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service
(CDARS).
Despite three fed
funds rate increases of 25 basis points each since December 2015,
interest rates remain at historically low levels, and the yield
curve is still not providing any meaningful relief on margin
pressure as long-term rates have stayed in a tight range. Growth of
the commercial loan portfolio in recent years, which typically
carries higher yields than residential and consumer loans, has
helped to maintain a stable level of interest income. This shift in
asset mix is in line with the Company’s strategic plan to
increase its concentration in commercial loans while maintaining a
stable residential loan portfolio. While commercial loans
inherently carry more risk, the Company has dedicated significant
resources in the credit administration department to mitigate the
additional risk. The opportunities for growth continue to be
primarily in the Central Vermont market, where economic activity is
more robust than in the Company’s Orleans and Caledonia
county markets, and where the Company is increasing its presence
and market share. The Company opened a loan production office in
Chittenden County, the economic hub of Vermont, during the first
quarter of 2017, which should further drive commercial loan
activity.
Interest income
increased $481,459, or 8.1%, for the second quarter of 2017
compared to the same quarter in 2016, and $819,597, or 7.0%, for
the first six months of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
Interest expense increased $72,509, or 10.7%, for the second
quarter of 2017 compared to the same quarter in 2016, and $143,658,
or 10.7%, for the first six months of 2017 compared to the same
period in 2016. The increase in interest income year over year
reflects the higher balances in net loans, which exceeded the prior
year by $30.9 million, or 6.6%. While the increases in interest
income in both comparison periods are largely due to the increase
in the asset base, the increase in short-term rates is starting to
have an impact as well, as is reflected in interest income for the
three months ended June 30, 2017 when compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2016. The increase in interest paid on deposits is
attributable to a higher utilization of brokered time deposits,
which carry higher rates than core non-maturity deposits as well as
the impact the increase in fed funds rate has had on interest
expense on borrowed funds and the interest expense associated with
the Company’s s junior subordinated debentures.
32
Net
interest income after the provision for loan losses improved by
$408,950, or 8.0%, for the second quarter of 2017 compared to the
same quarter in 2016, and $625,939, or 6.1%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The charge
to income for the provision for loan losses increased $50,000, or
20.0%, for the six month comparison period due to a combination of
a low level of losses in the first quarter of 2016 and the increase
in the loan portfolio, year over year. Please refer to the
Allowance for loan losses and provisions discussion in the Credit
Risk section for more information.
Net
income for the second quarter of 2017 was $1,499,513, an increase
of $204,314, or 15.8%, over net income of $1,295,199 for the second
quarter of 2016 and net income for the first six months of 2017 was
$2,913,729, an increase of $449,036, or 18.2%, over net income of
$2,464,693 for the same period in 2016. As stated above, net
interest income contributed significantly to the Company’s
increase in earnings. Additionally, an increase in non-interest
income of $63,032, or 4.8% for the quarter and $195,399, or 7.6%
year to date helped to offset in part the impact of increases in
total non-interest expenses of $217,388, or 4.7% and 266,215, or
2.8%, respectively. The increases in non-interest income are
attributable mostly to the courtesy overdraft program implemented
in the third quarter of 2016. With the increase in market rates,
the opportunity for refinancing has diminished and the mortgage
business is primarily from new purchase financing. Residential
mortgage lending activity is lagging behind 2016 levels, with
residential mortgage originations totaling $21,770,230 for the
first six months of 2017 compared to $22,263,622 for the same
period of 2016, which is also reflected in the decrease in the
Company’s loan fee income. Of those originations during the
first six months of 2017, secondary market sales totaled
$7,441,718, compared to $11,326,275 for the first six months of
2016, providing points and premiums from the sales of these
mortgages of $374,367 and $452,491, respectively, a decrease of
17.3%.
The
increases in non-interest expenses are mostly attributable to
increases in occupancy expense, marketing expense and expenditures
related to technology initiatives. Please refer to the Non-interest
Income and Expense sections for more information.
On
June 15, 2017, the Company's Board of Directors declared a
quarterly cash dividend of $0.17 per common share, payable on
August 1, 2017 to shareholders of record on July 15, 2017. This
represents an increase in the quarterly dividend of $0.01 per
share, compared to 2016 and is attributable to the Bank’s
strong performance in 2016, demonstrating the confidence of the
Board of Directors and management team in the Company’s
ability to generate shareholder value. The Company is focused on
increasing the profitability of the balance sheet, and prudently
managing operating expenses and risk, particularly credit risk, in
order to remain a well-capitalized bank in this challenging
interest rate environment.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
Company’s significant accounting policies, are fundamental to
understanding the Company’s results of operations and
financial condition because they require management to use
estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of the
Company’s assets or liabilities and financial results. These
policies are considered by management to be critical because they
require subjective and complex judgments about matters that are
inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially
different amounts would be reported under different conditions or
using different assumptions. The Company’s critical
accounting policies govern:
● the allowance for
loan losses (ALL);
● other real estate
owned (OREO);
● valuation of
residential mortgage servicing rights (MSRs);
● other than
temporary impairment of investment securities; and
● the carrying value
of goodwill.
These
policies are described further in the Company’s 2016 Annual
Report on Form 10-K in the section titled “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations – Critical Accounting Policies” and in Note
1 (Significant Accounting Policies) to the audited consolidated
financial statements. Except for certain changes in the
Company’s methodology for calculating the ALL, which were
adopted during the second quarter of 2017 and which is described
below in the Credit Risk section of this MD&A, there were no
material changes during the first six months of 2017 in the
Company’s critical accounting policies.
33
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net
income for the second quarter of 2017 was $1,499,513 or $0.29 per
common share, compared to $1,295,199 or $0.25 per common share for
the same quarter of 2016, and net income for the first six months
of 2017 was $2,913,729 or $0.57 per common share, compared to
$2,464,693 or $0.48 per common share for the same period in 2016.
Core earnings (net interest income) for the second quarter of 2017
increased $408,950, or 7.7% compared to the same quarter in 2017
and $675,939, or 6.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2017
compared to the prior year. In light of the continued pressure on
net interest margin and spread in this flat yield curve
environment, the Company is pleased with these increases. To help
offset this pressure, the Company has continued to shift assets
from lower yielding taxable investments to loans, especially
commercial loans, and to shift a portion of the investment
portfolio to higher yielding small business administration
securities (SBA) and agency mortgage-backed securities (Agency MBS)
within its available-for-sale (AFS) portfolio. Compared to the same
period last year, during the first six months of 2017, the loan mix
continued to shift in favor of higher yielding commercial loans,
while the deposit mix experienced an increase in lower cost
non-maturity deposits, both of which have benefitted the
Company’s net interest income. Interest paid on deposits,
which is the major component of total interest expense, increased
$59,409, or 11.7%, for the second quarter of 2017 compared to the
same quarter of 2016, and $80,604, or 7.9%, in the first six months
of 2017 compared to the same period of 2016, reflecting the
increased deposit balances and reflecting the increases in rates on
wholesale funds and brokered deposits. The Company recorded a
provision for loan losses of $150,000 for the second quarter of
2017 and 2016, and six month provisions for loan losses of $300,000
and $250,000, respectively. Non-interest income increased $63,032,
or 4.8%, for the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same
quarter of 2016 and $195,399, or 7.6%, for the first six months of
2017 compared to 2016. Non-interest expense increased $217,388, or
4.7% for the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same quarter of
2016 and $266,215, or 2.8%, for the first six months of 2017
compared to the prior year. The section below labeled Non-Interest
Income and Non-Interest Expense provides a more detailed discussion
on the significant components of these items.
Return
on average assets, which is net income divided by average total
assets, measures how effectively a corporation uses its assets to
produce earnings. Return on average equity, which is net income
divided by average shareholders' equity, measures how effectively a
corporation uses its equity capital to produce
earnings.
The
following table shows these ratios annualized for the comparison
periods.
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Return
on Average Assets
|
0.93%
|
0.87%
|
Return
on Average Equity
|
10.80%
|
9.87%
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Return
on Average Assets
|
0.92%
|
0.84%
|
Return
on Average Equity
|
10.64%
|
9.46%
|
34
The
following table summarizes the earnings performance and certain
balance sheet data of the Company for the periods
presented.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)
|
|||
|
|
||
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
June 30,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2016
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
Net
loans
|
$497,721,838
|
$482,280,911
|
$466,810,233
|
Total
assets
|
648,174,342
|
637,653,665
|
596,207,733
|
Total
deposits
|
533,307,279
|
504,735,032
|
468,983,156
|
Borrowed
funds
|
13,550,000
|
31,550,000
|
30,350,000
|
Total
liabilities
|
592,057,028
|
583,202,148
|
543,253,494
|
Total
shareholders' equity
|
56,117,314
|
54,451,517
|
52,954,239
|
|
|
|
|
Book
value per common share outstanding
|
$10.54
|
$10.27
|
$10.04
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
Total
interest income
|
$12,601,230
|
$11,781,633
|
Total
interest expense
|
1,483,915
|
1,340,257
|
Net
interest income
|
11,117,315
|
10,441,376
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan
losses
|
300,000
|
250,000
|
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
10,817,315
|
10,191,376
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
income
|
2,751,949
|
2,556,550
|
Non-interest
expense
|
9,623,687
|
9,357,472
|
Income
before income taxes
|
3,945,577
|
3,390,454
|
Applicable income
tax expense(1)
|
1,031,848
|
925,761
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
$2,913,729
|
$2,464,693
|
|
|
|
Per Common Share Data
|
|
|
Earnings per
common share (2)
|
$0.57
|
$0.48
|
Dividends declared
per common share
|
$0.34
|
$0.32
|
Weighted average
number of common shares outstanding
|
5,070,453
|
5,008,121
|
Number
of common shares outstanding, period end
|
5,087,652
|
5,026,790
|
(1)
Applicable income tax expense assumes a 34% tax rate.
(2)
Computed based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the periods presented.
35
INTEREST INCOME VERSUS INTEREST EXPENSE (NET INTEREST
INCOME)
The
largest component of the Company’s operating income is net
interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on
loans and investments and the interest paid on deposits and other
sources of funds (i.e. other borrowings). The Company’s level
of net interest income can fluctuate over time due to changes in
the level and mix of earning assets and sources of funds (volume),
and from changes in the yield earned and costs of funds (rate). A
portion of the Company’s income from municipal investments is
not subject to income taxes. Because the proportion of tax-exempt
items in the Company's portfolio varies from year-to-year, to
improve comparability of information, the non-taxable income shown
in the tables below has been converted to a tax equivalent basis.
Because the Company’s corporate tax rate is 34%, to equalize
tax-free and taxable income in the comparison, we divide the
tax-free income by 66%, with the result that every tax-free dollar
is equivalent to $1.52 in taxable income.
The
Company’s tax-exempt interest income of $336,197 for the
three months ended June 30, 2017 and $660,729 for the first six
months of 2017, compared to $322,150 and $602,247, respectively,
for the same periods last year was derived from municipal
investments, which comprised the entire held-to-maturity (HTM)
portfolio of $36,418,414 at June 30, 2017, and $34,013,002 at June
30, 2016.
The
following table shows the reconciliation between reported net
interest income and tax equivalent, net interest income for the
quarterly comparison periods presented.
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Net
interest income as presented
|
$5,695,333
|
$5,286,383
|
Effect
of tax-exempt income
|
173,192
|
165,956
|
Net
interest income, tax equivalent
|
$5,868,525
|
$5,452,339
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Net
interest income as presented
|
$11,117,315
|
$10,441,376
|
Effect
of tax-exempt income
|
340,376
|
310,248
|
Net
interest income, tax equivalent
|
$11,457,691
|
$10,751,624
|
36
The
following tables present average interest-earning assets and
average interest-bearing liabilities supporting earning assets.
Interest income (excluding interest on non-accrual loans) and
interest expense are both expressed on a tax equivalent basis, both
in dollars and as a rate/yield for the comparison periods
presented.
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
Income/
|
Rate/
|
Average
|
Income/
|
Rate/
|
|
Balance
|
Expense
|
Yield
|
Balance
|
Expense
|
Yield
|
Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
(1)
|
$493,133,662
|
$5,875,766
|
4.78%
|
$464,865,518
|
$5,478,997
|
4.74%
|
Taxable
investment securities
|
33,512,371
|
164,644
|
1.97%
|
26,946,237
|
128,197
|
1.91%
|
Tax-exempt
investment securities
|
54,233,974
|
509,389
|
3.77%
|
51,697,883
|
488,106
|
3.80%
|
Sweep and
interest-earning accounts
|
11,456,863
|
27,366
|
0.96%
|
4,027,584
|
4,700
|
0.47%
|
Other
investments (2)
|
2,427,314
|
40,864
|
6.75%
|
2,542,707
|
29,334
|
4.64%
|
|
$594,764,184
|
$6,618,029
|
4.46%
|
$550,079,929
|
$6,129,334
|
4.48%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
transaction accounts
|
$118,247,103
|
$67,062
|
0.23%
|
$110,404,866
|
$50,133
|
0.18%
|
Money market
accounts
|
88,031,136
|
203,376
|
0.93%
|
85,507,052
|
211,138
|
0.99%
|
Savings
deposits
|
97,448,357
|
30,895
|
0.13%
|
85,898,605
|
26,410
|
0.12%
|
Time
deposits
|
122,874,075
|
266,777
|
0.87%
|
108,754,441
|
221,020
|
0.82%
|
Borrowed
funds
|
10,300,659
|
18,979
|
0.74%
|
17,496,525
|
23,578
|
0.54%
|
Repurchase
agreements
|
29,644,902
|
22,235
|
0.30%
|
26,355,146
|
19,314
|
0.29%
|
Capital
lease obligations
|
443,522
|
9,065
|
8.18%
|
522,626
|
10,667
|
8.16%
|
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
12,887,000
|
131,115
|
4.08%
|
12,887,000
|
114,735
|
3.58%
|
|
$479,876,754
|
$749,504
|
0.63%
|
$447,826,261
|
$676,995
|
0.61%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
interest income
|
|
$5,868,525
|
|
|
$5,452,339
|
|
Net
interest spread (3)
|
|
|
3.83%
|
|
|
3.87%
|
Net
interest margin (4)
|
|
|
3.96%
|
|
|
3.99%
|
(1)
Included in gross loans are non-accrual loans with an average
balance of $2,562,901 and $3,179,107 for the three
|
months
ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Loans are stated before
deduction of unearned discount
|
and
allowance for loan losses, less loans held-for-sale.
|
(2)
Included in other investments is the Company’s FHLBB Stock
with average balances of $1,452,164 and $1,567,557
|
for
the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and a
dividend rate of approximately 4.08%
|
and
3.63%, respectively, per quarter.
|
(3)
Net interest spread is the difference between the average yield on
average interest-earning assets and the average
|
rate
paid on average interest-bearing liabilities.
|
(4)
Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average
earning assets.
|
37
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
Income/
|
Rate/
|
Average
|
Income/
|
Rate/
|
|
Balance
|
Expense
|
Yield
|
Balance
|
Expense
|
Yield
|
Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
(1)
|
$489,232,619
|
$11,492,633
|
4.74%
|
$459,842,951
|
$10,849,421
|
4.74%
|
Taxable
investment securities
|
34,737,861
|
316,370
|
1.84%
|
29,081,460
|
255,646
|
1.77%
|
Tax-exempt
investment securities
|
53,102,100
|
1,001,105
|
3.80%
|
48,243,249
|
912,495
|
3.80%
|
Sweep and
interest-earning accounts
|
12,743,237
|
54,838
|
0.87%
|
6,557,888
|
15,606
|
0.48%
|
Other
investments (2)
|
2,722,976
|
76,660
|
5.68%
|
2,559,163
|
58,713
|
4.61%
|
|
$592,538,793
|
$12,941,606
|
4.40%
|
$546,284,711
|
$12,091,881
|
4.45%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
transaction accounts
|
$116,998,410
|
$124,276
|
0.21%
|
$112,926,874
|
$103,833
|
0.18%
|
Money market
accounts
|
86,341,709
|
407,273
|
0.95%
|
86,581,602
|
428,606
|
1.00%
|
Savings
deposits
|
95,020,360
|
59,320
|
0.13%
|
84,449,518
|
52,009
|
0.12%
|
Time
deposits
|
120,921,569
|
515,030
|
0.86%
|
108,910,228
|
440,847
|
0.81%
|
Borrowed
funds
|
16,005,359
|
61,667
|
0.78%
|
12,113,153
|
31,634
|
0.53%
|
Repurchase
agreements
|
29,532,936
|
43,762
|
0.30%
|
25,396,197
|
37,305
|
0.30%
|
Capital
lease obligations
|
455,473
|
18,612
|
8.17%
|
533,515
|
21,769
|
8.16%
|
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
12,887,000
|
253,975
|
3.97%
|
12,887,000
|
224,254
|
3.50%
|
|
$478,162,816
|
$1,483,915
|
0.63%
|
$443,798,087
|
$1,340,257
|
0.61%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
interest income
|
|
$11,457,691
|
|
|
$10,751,624
|
|
Net
interest spread (3)
|
|
|
3.77%
|
|
|
3.84%
|
Net
interest margin (4)
|
|
|
3.90%
|
|
|
3.96%
|
(1)
Included in gross loans are non-accrual loans with an average
balance of $2,549,410 and $3,597,146 for the six
|
months
ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Loans are stated before
deduction of unearned discount
|
and
allowance for loan losses, less loans held-for-sale.
|
(2)
Included in other investments is the Company’s FHLBB Stock
with average balances of $1,747,826 and $1,584,013
|
respectively,
and a dividend rate of approximately 4.11% and 3.86%, respectively,
for the first six months of
|
2017
and 2016, respectively.
|
(3)
Net interest spread is the difference between the average yield on
average interest-earning assets and the average
|
rate
paid on average interest-bearing liabilities.
|
(4)
Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average
earning assets.
|
38
The
average volume of interest-earning assets for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 increased 8.1% and 8.5%,
respectively, compared to the same periods last year. Average yield
on interest-earning assets for the second quarter decreased two
basis points, to 4.46%, compared to 4.48% for the same period last
year, and decreased five basis points for the six months ended June
30, 2017, to 4.40%, from 4.45% for the same period last
year.
The
average volume of loans increased over the three- and six-month
comparison periods of 2017 versus 2016, by 6.1% and 6.4%,
respectively, while the average yield on loans increased four basis
points for the second quarter, to 4.78%, compared to 4.74% for the
second quarter of 2016, but remained flat for the six months ended
June 30, 2017, at 4.74%. The decline in average yields for the
first six months of 2017 compared to 2016, as well as the
calculation of the net interest spread and margin is attributable
to the fact that some of the recent growth in the loan portfolio
has been the larger, higher credit quality loans that command
slightly lower pricing. Interest earned on the loan portfolio as a
percentage of total interest income decreased for the three- and
six- month periods ended June 30, 2017, comprising approximately
88.8% of total interest income in both periods, versus 89.4% and
89.7%, respectively, for the same periods last year.
The
average volume of the taxable investment portfolio (classified as
available-for-sale) increased 24.4% during the second quarter of
2017 and 19.5% year to date, compared to the same periods last
year. Average yields on the taxable investment portfolio increased
six basis points and seven basis points, for the second quarter of
2017 and year to date, respectively, compared to the same periods
last year. These increases are due primarily to an effort to
continue to incrementally grow the investment portfolio as the
balance sheet grows in order to provide additional liquidity and
pledgeable assets. The average volume of the tax
exempt portfolio (classified as held-to-maturity and consisting of
municipal securities) increased 4.9% during the second quarter of
2017 and 10.1% year to date, compared to the same periods last year
due in part to the efforts of the Company to reach out into the
Central Vermont and Chittenden County markets for municipal
business. The average
tax-equivalent yield on the tax exempt portfolio decreased by three
basis points during the second quarter of 2017, but remained flat
for the six- month period ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same
periods last year, reflecting the continued low rate environment as
well as competitive pressures for municipal
investments.
The
average volume of sweep and interest-earning accounts, which
consists primarily of an interest bearing account at the Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston (FRBB) and two correspondent banks,
increased 184.5% during the three-month period and 94.3% during the
six-month period ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same periods
last year, and the average yield on these funds increased 49 basis
points and 39 basis points, respectively. This increase in volume
is attributable to a higher balance of cash periodically held on
hand in anticipation of funding loan growth.
In
comparison, the average volume of interest-bearing liabilities for
the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 increased 7.2%
and 7.7%, respectively, compared to the same period last year. The
average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased two
basis points during the second quarter of 2017 and the first six
months of 2017, compared to the same periods last
year.
The
average volume of interest-bearing transaction accounts increased
7.1% and 3.6%, respectively, during the second quarter and first
six months of 2017, compared to the same periods last year, and the
average rate paid on these accounts increased five basis points and
three basis points, respectively. The average volume of money
market accounts increased 3.0% during the three-month period ended
June 30, 2017, but decreased 0.3% during the six-month period ended
June 30, 2017, compared to the same periods in 2016, and the
average rate paid on these deposits decreased six basis points
during the second quarter of 2017 and five basis points in the year
to date comparison periods. The decrease in year-to-date average
balances is due to the seasonal runoff of municipal deposits.
The average volume
of savings accounts increased by 13.5% and 12.5%, respectively, for
the three-month and six-month comparison periods of 2017 versus
2016, partially due to several escrow accounts for deposits held
for the future purchase of properties in the Stowe area which
account for approximately half of the increase. Some of the
increase may still be due in part to the continued shift in product
mix from retail time deposits to savings accounts as consumers
anticipate higher rates in the near future. Compared to the same
periods in 2016, the average volume of retail time deposits
decreased 1.3% during the second quarter, and 2.6% year to date
2017, while the average volume of wholesale time deposits increased
during both the three- and six-month comparison periods in 2017.
With the recent increases in short term rates, there has been a
small amount of pressure from the more rate sensitive deposit
holders for higher rates. Otherwise, the market is not yet showing
any signs of higher rates being paid on deposit products. Wholesale
time deposits have been an increasingly beneficial source of
funding throughout 2016 and into 2017 as they have provided large
blocks of funding without the need to disrupt pricing in the
Company’s local markets. These funds can be obtained
relatively quickly on an as-needed basis, making them a valuable
alternative to traditional term borrowings from the
FHLBB.
39
The
average volume of borrowed funds decreased 41.1% and increased
32.1%, respectively, for the three-month and six-month comparison
periods of 2017 versus 2016, while the average rate paid on these
accounts increased in both periods by 20 basis points and 25 basis
points, respectively. The average volume of repurchase agreements
increased 12.5% and 16.3%, respectively, for three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same periods in 2016,
while the average rate paid on repurchase agreements increased one
basis point during the three-month period ended June 30, 2017, but
remained flat for the six-month period of 2017, compared to the
same periods in 2016.
For
the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016,
the average yield on interest-earning assets decreased two basis
points, while the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities
increased two basis points. For the six months ended June 30, 2017
and 2016, the average yield on interest-earning assets decreased
five basis points, while the average rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities increased two basis points. Net interest spread for the
second quarter of 2017 was 3.83%, a decrease of four basis points
from 3.87% for the same period in 2016, and for the six-month
comparison periods of 2017 and 2016, was 3.77% and 3.84%,
respectively. Net interest margin decreased three basis points
during the second quarter of 2017 compared to the second quarter of
2016, and six basis points during the six-month comparison periods
of 2017 and 2016.
The
following table summarizes the variances in interest income and
interest expense on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the periods
presented for 2017 and 2016 resulting from volume changes in
average assets and average liabilities and fluctuations in average
rates earned and paid.
Changes in Interest Income and Interest Expense
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||||
|
Variance
|
Variance
|
|
Variance
|
Variance
|
|
|
Due to
|
Due to
|
Total
|
Due to
|
Due to
|
Total
|
|
Rate (1)
|
Volume (1)
|
Variance
|
Rate (1)
|
Volume (1)
|
Variance
|
Average Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
$63,622
|
$333,147
|
$396,769
|
$(49,517)
|
$692,729
|
$643,212
|
Taxable
investment securities
|
5,266
|
31,182
|
36,448
|
10,938
|
49,786
|
60,724
|
Tax-exempt
investment securities
|
(2,678)
|
23,961
|
21,283
|
(3,204)
|
91,814
|
88,610
|
Sweep and
interest-earning accounts
|
13,984
|
8,682
|
22,666
|
24,468
|
14,764
|
39,232
|
Other
investments
|
13,471
|
(1,942)
|
11,529
|
14,192
|
3,755
|
17,947
|
|
$93,665
|
$395,030
|
$488,695
|
$(3,123)
|
$852,848
|
$849,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
transaction accounts
|
$13,419
|
$3,510
|
$16,929
|
$16,799
|
$3,644
|
$20,443
|
Money market
accounts
|
(13,975)
|
6,213
|
(7,762)
|
(20,203)
|
(1,130)
|
(21,333)
|
Savings
deposits
|
1,039
|
3,446
|
4,485
|
1,003
|
6,308
|
7,311
|
Time
deposits
|
16,970
|
28,787
|
45,757
|
25,803
|
48,380
|
74,183
|
Borrowed
funds
|
8,677
|
(13,276)
|
(4,599)
|
19,775
|
10,258
|
30,033
|
Repurchase
agreements
|
549
|
2,372
|
2,921
|
286
|
6,171
|
6,457
|
Capital
lease obligations
|
11
|
(1,613)
|
(1,602)
|
5
|
(3,162)
|
(3,157)
|
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
16,380
|
0
|
16,380
|
29,721
|
0
|
29,721
|
|
$43,070
|
$29,439
|
$72,509
|
$73,189
|
$70,469
|
$143,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in net interest income
|
$50,595
|
$365,591
|
$416,186
|
$(76,312)
|
$782,379
|
$706,067
|
(1)
Items which have shown a year-to-year increase in volume have
variances allocated as follows:
|
Variance
due to rate = Change in rate x new volume
|
Variance
due to volume = Change in volume x old rate
|
Items
which have shown a year-to-year decrease in volume have variances
allocated as follows:
|
Variance
due to rate = Change in rate x old volume
|
Variances
due to volume = Change in volume x new rate
|
40
NON-INTEREST INCOME AND NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Non-interest Income
The
components of non-interest income for the periods presented are as
follows:
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
||
|
June 30,
|
Change
|
June 30,
|
Change
|
||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
Income
|
Percent
|
2017
|
2016
|
Income
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
fees
|
$772,238
|
$655,540
|
$116,698
|
17.80%
|
$1,520,355
|
$1,273,219
|
$247,136
|
19.41%
|
Income
from sold loans
|
184,072
|
231,297
|
(47,225)
|
-20.42%
|
374,367
|
452,491
|
(78,124)
|
-17.27%
|
Other
income from loans
|
209,288
|
210,703
|
(1,415)
|
-0.67%
|
394,905
|
406,591
|
(11,686)
|
-2.87%
|
Net
realized gain on sale of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities
available-for-sale
|
1,270
|
0
|
1,270
|
100.00%
|
3,400
|
0
|
3,400
|
100.00%
|
Income
from CFSG Partners
|
85,334
|
101,002
|
(15,668)
|
-15.51%
|
198,514
|
183,581
|
14,933
|
8.13%
|
Exchange
income
|
23,500
|
24,000
|
(500)
|
-2.08%
|
44,500
|
51,500
|
(7,000)
|
-13.59%
|
SERP
fair value adjustment
|
17,377
|
7,935
|
9,442
|
118.99%
|
47,491
|
14,406
|
33,085
|
229.66%
|
Other
income
|
88,652
|
88,222
|
430
|
0.49%
|
168,417
|
174,762
|
(6,345)
|
-3.63%
|
Total
non-interest income
|
$1,381,731
|
$1,318,699
|
$63,032
|
4.78%
|
$2,751,949
|
$2,556,550
|
$195,399
|
7.64%
|
Total
non-interest income increased $63,032 for the second quarter of
2017 and $195,399 for the first six months of 2017 versus the same
periods in 2016, with significant changes noted in the
following:
●
Service fees on
deposit accounts increased $116,698, or 17.8%, for the second
quarter and $247,136, or 19.4%, year over year due to the
implementation of the Bank’s new courtesy overdraft
protection program at the beginning of the third quarter in 2016,
which provided an increase of $98,505, or 51.5% and $225,403, or
63.0%, compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2016,
respectively.
●
Income from sold
loans decreased $47,225, or 20.4%, for the second quarter and
$78,124, or 17.3%, year over year, due to a decrease in the volume
of secondary market sales year over year, resulting from the
increase in market rates as mentioned in the overview.
●
Income from CFSG
Partners decreased $15,668, or 15.5%, for the second quarter, but
increased $14,933, or 8.1%, year over year. The decrease for the
second quarter is due to an increase in expenses and the increase
year over year is attributable to an increase in asset management
fees due to an increase in the equity markets.
●
Exchange income
was flat when comparing the second quarter 2017 to 2016 but
decreased $7,000, or 13.6%, year over year due to fluctuations in
the currency rates during the first quarter of 2017 as the U.S.
dollar strengthened in relation to the Canadian
dollar.
●
SERP fair value
adjustment increased $9,442, or 119.0%, for the second quarter and
$33,085, or 230.0%, year over year due to increases in the equity
markets. The final payment of SERP benefits was paid on July 1,
2017 and the related asset liquidated shortly thereafter. A final
loss on the sale of $4,019 was recorded at the time of sale. Other
than this loss recorded in the third quarter of 2017, there will no
longer be an impact to earnings from this line item.
41
Non-interest Expense
The
components of non-interest expense for the periods presented are as
follows:
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
||
|
June 30,
|
Change
|
June 30,
|
Change
|
||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
Expense
|
Percent
|
2017
|
2016
|
Expense
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and
wages
|
$1,703,751
|
$1,725,000
|
$(21,249)
|
-1.23%
|
$3,414,875
|
$3,450,000
|
$(35,125)
|
-1.02%
|
Employee
benefits
|
692,418
|
685,082
|
7,336
|
1.07%
|
1,333,979
|
1,370,164
|
(36,185)
|
-2.64%
|
Occupancy
expenses, net
|
661,294
|
606,358
|
54,936
|
9.06%
|
1,348,727
|
1,252,104
|
96,623
|
7.72%
|
Other
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer
outsourcing
|
138,988
|
125,280
|
13,708
|
10.94%
|
277,106
|
247,975
|
29,131
|
11.75%
|
Service
contracts - administrative
|
101,655
|
96,217
|
5,438
|
5.65%
|
196,663
|
185,916
|
10,747
|
5.78%
|
Marketing
expense
|
126,992
|
92,400
|
34,592
|
37.44%
|
247,498
|
184,800
|
62,698
|
33.93%
|
Consultant
services
|
53,342
|
29,410
|
23,932
|
81.37%
|
101,822
|
64,460
|
37,362
|
57.96%
|
Collection
& non-accruing loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense
|
17,055
|
10,000
|
7,055
|
70.55%
|
20,710
|
38,000
|
(17,290)
|
-45.50%
|
Miscellaneous
computer expense
|
28,453
|
7,614
|
20,839
|
273.69%
|
56,812
|
25,863
|
30,949
|
119.67%
|
OREO
expense
|
6,000
|
36,463
|
(30,463)
|
-83.54%
|
12,804
|
31,969
|
(19,165)
|
-59.95%
|
Other
miscellaneous expenses
|
1,362,620
|
1,261,356
|
101,264
|
8.03%
|
2,612,691
|
2,506,221
|
106,470
|
4.25%
|
Total
non-interest expense
|
$4,892,568
|
$4,675,180
|
$217,388
|
4.65%
|
$9,623,687
|
$9,357,472
|
$266,215
|
2.84%
|
Total
non-interest expense increased $217,388, or 4.7%, for the second
quarter of 2017 and $266,215, or 2.8%, for the first six months of
2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 with significant changes
noted in the following:
●
Salaries and wages
decreased $21,249, or 1.2%, for the second quarter and $35,125, or
1.0%, due primarily to the retirement of an executive employee that
offset normal salary increases.
●
Occupancy expenses
increased $54,936, or 9.1% for the second quarter and $96,623, or
7.7%, year over year, due in part to the fact that the region
experienced a shift to more seasonable winter conditions compared
to the past few years causing an increase in heating costs and
maintenance costs for snow removal. The Company has also seen a
higher level of repairs and service to HVAC and sprinkler systems
and expenses for general maintenance and repair of branch premises.
Also contributing to the increase in occupancy is the cost of the
lease on the Burlington loan production office that opened in the
first quarter of 2017 in the amount of $16,950 for the first six
months of 2017.
●
Computer
outsourcing increased $13,708, or 10.9%, for the second quarter and
$29,131, or 11.8%, year over year due in part to an increase in
purchased electronic technology services from the Company’s
core vendor, particularly in the area of electronic and mobile
banking.
●
Marketing expense
increased $34,592, or 37.4%, for the second quarter and $62,698, or
33.9%, year over year due to the Company’s strategic decision
to enhance marketing efforts, including a shift to television ads
from paper and radio, in the 2017 calendar year.
●
Consultant
services increased $23,932, or 81.4%, for the second quarter and
$37,362, or 58.0%, year over year partly due to a contract with a
consultant for technology related projects.
●
Collection &
non-accruing loan expense increased $7,055, or 70.6%, for the
second quarter, while a decrease of $17,290, or 45.5%, is noted
year over year. The variance in both comparison periods is due to
non-recurring recovery of expenses of approximately $14,000 in the
second quarter of 2016 and $30,000 in the first quarter of
2017.
●
Miscellaneous
computer expense increased $20,839, or 273.7%, for the second
quarter and $30,949, or 119.7%, year over year, partly due to an
upgrade of the devices used for board and management reporting
which has eliminated the use and distribution of paper reports. As
the cost of some technology decreases, individual items are below
the depreciable threshold and become a direct expense.
42
●
OREO expense
decreased $30,463, or 83.5% for the second quarter and $19,165, or
60.0%, year over year. During the second quarter of 2016, a $26,000
write-down was taken on an OREO property, contributing to the
decrease for the second quarter in 2017 versus 2016, while, in the
first quarter of 2016, the Company recouped approximately $15,000
in condominium association fees on a former OREO property, helping
to offset expenses in 2016.
APPLICABLE INCOME TAXES
The
provision for income taxes increased $50,280, or 10.4%, to $534,983
for the second quarter of 2017 compared to $484,703 for the same
period in 2016 and $106,087, or 11.5%, to $1,031,848 for the first
six months of 2017 compared to $925,761 for the first six months of
2016. These increases are due primarily to an increase in income
before taxes of $254,594, or 14.3%, for the second quarter of 2017
compared to the same quarter in 2016, and an increase of $555,123,
or 16.4%, for the first six months of 2017 compared to the same
period in 2016. Tax credits related to limited partnerships
amounted to $106,599 and $98,475, respectively, for the second
quarter of 2017 and 2016, and $213,198 and $196,950 for the first
six months of 2017 and 2016.
Amortization
expense related to limited partnership investments is included as a
component of income tax expense and amounted to $105,414 and
$102,006, respectively, for the second quarter of 2017 and 2016,
and $210,828 and $204,012 for the first six months of 2017 and
2016, respectively. These investments provide tax benefits,
including tax credits, and are designed to provide an effective
yield of between 8% and 10%.
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION
The
following table reflects the composition of the Company's major
categories of assets and liabilities as a percentage of total
assets or liabilities and shareholders’ equity, as the case
may be, as of the dates indicated:
|
June 30, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
June 30, 2016
|
|||
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
$502,772,845
|
77.57%
|
$487,249,226
|
76.41%
|
$471,567,355
|
79.09%
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
35,634,716
|
5.50%
|
33,715,051
|
5.29%
|
28,079,675
|
4.71%
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
36,418,414
|
5.62%
|
49,886,631
|
7.82%
|
34,013,002
|
5.70%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand
deposits
|
110,398,464
|
17.03%
|
104,472,268
|
16.38%
|
95,419,388
|
16.00%
|
Interest-bearing
transaction accounts
|
116,869,761
|
18.03%
|
118,053,360
|
18.51%
|
106,925,038
|
17.93%
|
Money market
accounts
|
73,279,696
|
11.31%
|
79,042,619
|
12.40%
|
70,354,509
|
11.80%
|
Savings
deposits
|
97,929,768
|
15.11%
|
86,776,856
|
13.61%
|
86,733,253
|
14.55%
|
Time
deposits
|
134,829,590
|
20.80%
|
116,389,929
|
18.25%
|
109,550,968
|
18.37%
|
Federal
Funds Purchased
|
10,000,000
|
1.54%
|
0
|
0.00%
|
0
|
0.00%
|
Short-term
advances
|
0
|
0.00%
|
30,000,000
|
4.70%
|
30,000,000
|
5.03%
|
Long-term
advances
|
3,550,000
|
0.55%
|
1,550,000
|
0.24%
|
350,000
|
0.06%
|
The
Company's total loan portfolio at June 30, 2017 increased
$15,523,619, or 3.2%, from December 31, 2016 and $31,205,490, or
6.6%, year over year. Securities available-for-sale increased
$1,919,665, or 5.7%, year to date, and $7,555,041, or 26.9%, year
over year. Securities held-to-maturity decreased $13,468,217, or
27.0%, year to date reflecting the June 30 fiscal year cycle of
many municipal customers, but increased $2,405,412, or 7.1%, year
over year. Held-to-maturity securities are made up of investments
from the Company’s municipal customers in its service areas.
While the Company has used maturing securities to fund loan growth
in recent periods, the liquidity provided by these investments is
very important, and the portfolio has increased year over year to
help support the growth in the loan portfolio, as this asset growth
requires additional liquidity.
Total
deposits increased $28,572,247, or 5.7%, from December 31, 2016 to
June 30, 2017, and an increase of $64,324,123, or 13.7%, is noted
year over year. Demand deposits increased $5,926,196, or 5.7%, year
to date and $14,979,076, or 15.7%, year over year, split between
growth in business checking ($10.1 million, or 17.6%) and regular
checking ($4.9 million, or 12.8%). The Company is seeing growth in
the business customer base and improvements in financial health of
existing business customers. Money market accounts decreased
$5,762,923, or 7.3%, year to date, and increased $2,925,187, or
4.2% year over year, due in part to the seasonal year-to-date
municipal deposit decline and a growth in regular money market
accounts both year-to-date and year-over-year. Savings deposits
increased significantly in both periods, with increases of
$11,152,912, or 12.9%, year to date and $11,196,515, or 12.9%, year
over year. As mentioned earlier, this is due to multiple
construction escrow accounts. Time deposits increased $18,439,661,
or 15.8%, year to date and $25,278,622, or 23.1%, year over year,
which is entirely attributable to an increase in wholesale
purchased time deposits. Overnight purchases and short-term
advances from the FHLBB totaling $10,000,000 were reported at June
30, 2017, $30,000,000 at December 31, 2016 and $30,000,000 at June
30, 2016. In addition, there were outstanding long-term advances
from the FHLBB of $3,550,000 at June 30, 2017, $1,550,000 at
December 31, 2016, and $350,000 at June 30, 2016.
43
Interest Rate Risk and Asset and Liability
Management - Management actively monitors and manages the
Company’s interest rate risk exposure and attempts to
structure the balance sheet to maximize net interest income while
controlling its exposure to interest rate risk. The Company's
Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO) is made up of the
Executive Officers and certain Vice Presidents of the Bank
representing major business lines. The ALCO formulates strategies
to manage interest rate risk by evaluating the impact on earnings
and capital of such factors as current interest rate forecasts and
economic indicators, potential changes in such forecasts and
indicators, liquidity and various business strategies. The ALCO
meets at least quarterly to review financial statements, liquidity
levels, yields and spreads to better understand, measure, monitor
and control the Company’s interest rate risk. In the ALCO
process, the committee members apply policy limits set forth in the
Asset Liability, Liquidity and Investment policies approved and
periodically reviewed by the Company’s Board of Directors.
The ALCO's methods for evaluating interest rate risk include an
analysis of the effects of interest rate changes on net interest
income and an analysis of the Company's interest rate sensitivity
"gap", which provides a static analysis of the maturity and
repricing characteristics of the entire balance sheet. The ALCO
Policy also includes a contingency funding plan to help management
prepare for unforeseen liquidity restrictions, including
hypothetical severe liquidity crises.
Interest rate risk
represents the sensitivity of earnings to changes in market
interest rates. As interest rates change, the interest income and
expense streams associated with the Company’s financial
instruments also change, thereby impacting net interest income
(NII), the primary component of the Company’s earnings.
Fluctuations in interest rates can also have an impact on
liquidity. The ALCO uses an outside consultant to perform rate
shock simulations to the Company's net interest income, as well as
a variety of other analyses. It is the ALCO’s function to
provide the assumptions used in the modeling process. Assumptions
used in prior period simulation models are regularly tested by
comparing projected NII with actual NII. The ALCO utilizes the
results of the simulation model to quantify the estimated exposure
of NII and liquidity to sustained interest rate changes. The
simulation model captures the impact of changing interest rates on
the interest income received and interest expense paid on all
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities reflected
on the Company’s balance sheet. The model also simulates the
balance sheet’s sensitivity to a prolonged flat rate
environment. All rate scenarios are simulated assuming a parallel
shift of the yield curve; however further simulations are performed
utilizing non-parallel changes in the yield curve. The results of
this sensitivity analysis are compared to the ALCO policy limits
which specify a maximum tolerance level for NII exposure over a
1-year horizon, assuming no balance sheet growth, given a 200 basis
point (bp) shift upward and a 100 bp shift downward in interest
rates.
Under
the Company’s interest rate sensitivity modeling, with the
continued asset sensitive balance sheet, in a rising rate
environment NII is expected to trend upward as the short-term asset
base (cash and adjustable rate loans) quickly cycle upward while
the retail funding base (deposits) lags the market. If rates paid
on deposits have to be increased more and/or more quickly than
projected, the expected benefit to rising rates would be reduced.
In a falling rate environment, NII is expected to trend slightly
downward compared with the current rate environment scenario for
the first year of the simulation as asset yield erosion is not
fully offset by decreasing funding costs. Thereafter, net interest
income is projected to experience sustained downward pressure as
funding costs reach their assumed floors and asset yields continue
to reprice into the lower rate environment. The recent increase in
the federal funds rate, the third in the past two years, is
expected to generate a positive impact to the Company’s NII
in 2017 as variable rate loans reprice in the second quarter of the
year; however the behavior of the long end of the curve will also
be very important to the Company’s margins going forward, as
funding costs continue to rise.
The
following table summarizes the estimated impact on the Company's
NII over a twelve month period, assuming a gradual parallel shift
of the yield curve beginning June 30, 2017:
Rate Change
|
Percent Change in NII
|
|
|
Down
100 basis points
|
-2.7%
|
Up 200
basis points
|
3.5%
|
The
amounts shown in the table are well within the ALCO Policy limits.
However, those amounts do not represent a forecast and should not
be relied upon as indicative of future results. While assumptions
used in the ALCO process, including the interest rate simulation
analyses, are developed based upon current economic and local
market conditions, and expected future conditions, the Company
cannot provide any assurances as to the predictive nature of these
assumptions, including how customer preferences or competitor
influences might change.
44
Credit Risk - As a financial
institution, one of the primary risks the Company manages is credit
risk, the risk of loss stemming from borrowers’ failure to
repay loans or inability to meet other contractual obligations. The
Company’s Board of Directors prescribes policies for managing
credit risk, including Loan, Appraisal and Environmental policies.
These policies are supplemented by comprehensive underwriting
standards and procedures. The Company maintains a Credit
Administration department whose function includes credit analysis
and monitoring of and reporting on the status of the loan
portfolio, including delinquent and non-performing loan trends. The
Company also monitors concentration of credit risk in a variety of
areas, including portfolio mix, the level of loans to individual
borrowers and their related interest, loans to industry segments,
and the geographic distribution of commercial real estate loans.
Loans are reviewed periodically by an independent loan review firm
to help ensure accuracy of the Company's internal risk ratings and
compliance with various internal policies, procedures and
regulatory guidance.
Residential
mortgages represent approximately half of the Company’s loan
balances; that level has been on a gradual decline in recent years,
with a strategic shift to commercial lending. The Company maintains
a mortgage loan portfolio of traditional mortgage products and does
not engage in higher risk loans such as option adjustable rate
mortgage products, high loan-to-value products, interest only
mortgages, subprime loans and products with deeply discounted
teaser rates. Residential mortgages with loan-to-values exceeding
80% are generally covered by private mortgage insurance
(“PMI”). A 90% loan-to-value residential mortgage
product without PMI is only available to borrowers with excellent
credit and low debt-to-income ratios and has not been widely
originated. Junior lien home equity products make up 20.4% of the
residential mortgage portfolio with maximum loan-to-value ratios
(including prior liens) of 80%. The Company also originates some
home equity loans greater than 80% under an insured loan program
with stringent underwriting criteria.
The
Company’s strategy is to continue growing the commercial
& industrial and commercial real estate portfolios. Consistent
with the strategic focus on commercial lending, both segments saw
solid growth during 2016 despite some significant loan payoffs
during the period. The 2016 growth included balances being drawn on
commercial construction loans and higher balances on commercial
lines of credit. Commercial and commercial real estate loan demand
has continued into 2017 and is expected to increase with the
funding of construction projects and draws on lines of credit that
are at a seasonal low point. Commercial and commercial real estate
loans together comprised 54.9% of the Company’s loan
portfolio at June 30, 2016, growing to 55.5% at December 31, 2016
and to 57.5% at June 30, 2017. The increase in the absolute and
relative size of the commercial loan portfolio has also increased
geographic diversification, with much of the growth in commercial
loans occurring along the I-89 corridor from White River Junction
through Chittenden County.
The
following table reflects the composition of the Company's loan
portfolio, by portfolio segment, as a percentage of total loans as
of the dates indicated:
|
June 30, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
June 30, 2016
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial &
industrial
|
$79,361,739
|
15.78%
|
$68,730,573
|
14.11%
|
$72,878,438
|
15.45%
|
Commercial real
estate
|
209,886,793
|
41.75%
|
201,728,280
|
41.40%
|
185,950,674
|
39.43%
|
1 - 4
family residential - 1st lien
|
164,398,836
|
32.70%
|
166,691,962
|
34.21%
|
161,361,864
|
34.22%
|
1 - 4
family residential - Jr lien
|
42,166,407
|
8.39%
|
42,927,335
|
8.81%
|
44,078,168
|
9.35%
|
Consumer
|
6,959,070
|
1.38%
|
7,171,076
|
1.47%
|
7,298,211
|
1.55%
|
Total
loans
|
502,772,845
|
100.00%
|
487,249,226
|
100.00%
|
471,567,355
|
100.00%
|
Deduct
(add):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
5,374,378
|
|
5,278,445
|
|
5,077,420
|
|
Deferred net loan
costs
|
(323,371)
|
|
(310,130)
|
|
(320,298)
|
|
Net
loans
|
$497,721,838
|
|
$482,280,911
|
|
$466,810,233
|
|
Risk
in the Company’s commercial & industrial and commercial
real estate loan portfolios is mitigated in part by government
guarantees issued by federal agencies such as the U.S. Small
Business Administration (SBA) and U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) Rural Development. At June 30, 2017, the Company had
$25,530,712 in guaranteed loans with guaranteed balances of
$19,318,996, compared to $23,929,426 in guaranteed loans with
guaranteed balances of $18,128,676 at December 31, 2016 and
$23,426,836 in guaranteed loans with guaranteed balances of
$17,764,760 at June 30, 2016.
45
The
Company works actively with customers early in the delinquency
process to help them to avoid default and foreclosure. Commercial
& industrial and commercial real estate loans are generally
placed on non-accrual status when there is deterioration in the
financial position of the borrower, payment in full of principal
and interest is not expected, and/or principal or interest has been
in default for 90 days or more. However, such a loan need not be
placed on non-accrual status if it is both well secured and in the
process of collection. Residential mortgages and home equity loans
are considered for non-accrual status at 90 days past due and are
evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The Company obtains current
property appraisals or market value analyses and considers the cost
to carry and sell collateral in order to assess the level of
specific allocations required. Consumer loans are generally not
placed in non-accrual but are charged off by the time they reach
120 days past due. When a loan is placed in non-accrual status, the
Company's policy is to reverse the accrued interest against current
period income and to discontinue the accrual of interest until the
borrower clearly demonstrates the ability and intention to resume
normal payments, typically demonstrated by regular timely payments
for a period of not less than six months. Interest payments
received on non-accrual or impaired loans are generally applied as
a reduction of the loan principal balance.
The
Company’s non-performing assets decreased $541,553 or 13.6%
during the first six months of 2017. The change in non-performing
assets is primarily the result of several residential loans moving
under ninety days past due. Claims receivable on related government
guarantees were $0 at June 30, 2017 compared to $56,319 at December
31, 2016 and $126,909 at June 30, 2016, with numerous USDA and SBA
claims settled and paid throughout 2016. Non-performing loans as of
June 30, 2017 carried USDA and SBA guarantees totaling $137,468,
compared to $146,323 at December 31, 2016 and $149,341 at June 30,
2016.
The
following table reflects the composition of the Company's
non-performing assets, by portfolio segment, as a percentage of
total non-performing assets as of the dates indicated:
|
June 30, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
June 30, 2016
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans past due 90 days or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and still accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& industrial
|
$0
|
0.00%
|
$26,042
|
0.65%
|
$120,111
|
2.56%
|
Commercial
real estate
|
15,011
|
0.43%
|
0
|
0.00%
|
406,451
|
8.65%
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
354,988
|
10.29%
|
1,068,083
|
26.75%
|
694,007
|
14.77%
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
71,614
|
2.07%
|
27,905
|
0.70%
|
0
|
0.00%
|
Consumer
|
0
|
0.00%
|
2,176
|
0.05%
|
0
|
0.00%
|
|
441,613
|
12.79%
|
1,124,206
|
28.15%
|
1,220,569
|
25.98%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& industrial
|
135,379
|
3.92%
|
143,128
|
3.59%
|
256,456
|
5.46%
|
Commercial
real estate
|
728,093
|
21.10%
|
765,584
|
19.17%
|
966,071
|
20.57%
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
1,403,312
|
40.66%
|
1,227,220
|
30.74%
|
1,467,171
|
31.23%
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
398,862
|
11.56%
|
338,602
|
8.48%
|
377,911
|
8.05%
|
|
2,665,646
|
77.24%
|
2,474,534
|
61.98%
|
3,067,609
|
65.31%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
343,928
|
9.97%
|
394,000
|
9.87%
|
409,000
|
8.71%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3,451,187
|
100.00%
|
$3,992,740
|
100.00%
|
$4,697,178
|
100.00%
|
(1) No
consumer loans were in non-accrual status as of the consolidated
balance sheet dates. In accordance with Company policy, delinquent
consumer loans are charged off at 120 days past due.
The
Company’s OREO portfolio at June 30, 2017 consisted of two
residential properties and one commercial property compared to two
residential properties at December 31, 2016 and two residential
properties at June 30, 2016. All of the residential properties were
acquired through the normal foreclosure process. The Company took
control of two commercial properties in 2017, one in January and
the other in March. One of the commercial properties sold in April,
2017 and the other failed to sell at auction in May, 2017 and will
be listed for sale.
The
Company’s troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) are principally
a result of extending loan repayment terms to relieve cash flow
difficulties. The Company has only infrequently reduced interest
rates for borrowers below the current market rate. The Company has
not forgiven principal or reduced accrued interest within the terms
of original restructurings. Management evaluates each TDR situation
on its own merits and does not foreclose the granting of any
particular type of concession.
46
The
non-performing assets in the table above include the following TDRs
that were past due 90 days or more or in non-accrual status as of
the dates presented:
|
June 30, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
June 30, 2016
|
|||
|
Number of
|
Principal
|
Number of
|
Principal
|
Number of
|
Principal
|
|
Loans
|
Balance
|
Loans
|
Balance
|
Loans
|
Balance
|
Commercial &
industrial
|
2
|
$135,379
|
2
|
$143,127
|
3
|
$191,919
|
Commercial real
estate
|
2
|
337,516
|
2
|
354,811
|
2
|
373,767
|
Residential real
estate - 1st lien
|
7
|
427,170
|
9
|
516,886
|
10
|
684,636
|
Residential real
estate - Jr lien
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
117,158
|
1
|
52,130
|
|
12
|
$900,065
|
15
|
$1,131,982
|
16
|
$1,302,452
|
The
remaining TDRs were performing in accordance with their modified
terms as of the dates presented and consisted of the
following:
|
June 30, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
June 30, 2016
|
|||
|
Number of
|
Principal
|
Number of
|
Principal
|
Number of
|
Principal
|
|
Loans
|
Balance
|
Loans
|
Balance
|
Loans
|
Balance
|
Commercial &
industrial
|
0
|
$0
|
0
|
$0
|
2
|
$35,340
|
Commercial real
estate
|
5
|
1,312,535
|
5
|
1,350,480
|
5
|
1,391,990
|
Residential real
estate - 1st lien
|
53
|
2,742,449
|
28
|
2,722,973
|
27
|
2,558,079
|
Residential real
estate - Jr lien
|
2
|
63,452
|
2
|
63,971
|
3
|
132,822
|
|
60
|
$4,118,436
|
35
|
$4,137,424
|
37
|
$4,118,231
|
As of
the balance sheet dates, the Company evaluates whether it is
contractually committed to lend additional funds to debtors with
impaired, non-accrual or modified loans. The Company is
contractually committed to lend on one SBA guaranteed line of
credit to a borrower whose lending relationship was previously
restructured.
Allowance for loan losses and
provisions - The Company maintains an ALL at a level that
management believes is appropriate to absorb losses inherent in the
loan portfolio as of the measurement date (See Note 5 of the
Company’s unaudited financial statements). Although the
Company, in establishing the ALL, considers the inherent losses in
individual loans and pools of loans, the ALL is a general reserve
available to absorb all credit losses in the loan portfolio. No
part of the ALL is segregated to absorb losses from any particular
loan or segment of loans.
When
establishing the ALL each quarter, the Company applies a
combination of historical loss factors and qualitative factors to
loan segments, including residential first and junior lien
mortgages, commercial real estate, commercial & industrial, and
consumer loan portfolios. The Company applies numerous qualitative
factors to each segment of the loan portfolio. Those factors
include the levels of and trends in delinquencies and non-accrual
loans, criticized and classified assets, volumes and terms of
loans, and the impact of any loan policy changes. Experience,
ability and depth of lending personnel, levels of policy and
documentation exceptions, national and local economic trends, the
competitive environment, and concentrations of credit are also
factors considered.
Specific
allocations to the ALL are made for certain impaired loans.
Impaired loans include all troubled debt restructurings and loans
to a borrower that in aggregate are greater than $100,000 and that
are in non-accrual status. A loan is considered impaired when it is
probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts
due, including interest and principal, according to the contractual
terms of the loan agreement. The Company will review all the facts
and circumstances surrounding non-accrual loans and on a
case-by-case basis may consider loans below the threshold as
impaired when such treatment is material to the financial
statements. See Note 5 to the accompanying unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements for information on the recorded
investment in impaired loans and their related
allocations.
During
the second quarter of 2017, the Company transitioned to a software
solution for preparing the ALL calculation and related reports,
replacing previously used Excel spreadsheets. The software solution
provides the Company with stronger data integrity, ease and
efficiency in ALL preparation, and helps ready the company for the
future transition to the Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL)
model.
47
During
the implementation and testing of the software, several changes to
the underlying ALL methodology were made. Those changes included
(i) removing the government guaranteed balances from both the
pooled loans and impaired loans, (ii) treating all TDRs as impaired
regardless of size, and (iii) using a fixed look back period for
historical losses based on loss history and economic conditions
versus the highest look back period of the last 5 years. The impact
of not reserving for government guaranteed balances reduced
required reserves by approximately $207,000 and the change to
historical loss methodology saw required reserves fall by
approximately $151,000, while the inclusion of all TDRs in the
impaired calculation increased required reserves by approximately
$111,000. The net impact of methodology changes reduced required
reserves by approximately $247,000 for the quarter ended June 30,
2017.
The
second quarter required reserves increased by $29,396. Pooled
reserves associated with strong loan growth accounted for
approximately $165,000 in required reserves, while increases in
qualitative factors for delinquency/non-accrual and criticized and
classified loans levels for the commercial real estate and
residential real estate portfolios accounted for an increase of
$110,000. These increases were largely offset by the one-time
methodology changes noted above.
The
following table summarizes the Company's loan loss experience for
the periods presented:
|
As of or Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Loans
outstanding, end of period
|
$502,772,845
|
$471,567,355
|
Average loans
outstanding during period
|
$489,232,619
|
$459,842,951
|
Non-accruing
loans, end of period
|
$2,665,646
|
$3,067,609
|
Non-accruing
loans, net of government guarantees
|
$2,528,178
|
$2,918,268
|
|
|
|
Allowance,
beginning of period
|
$5,278,445
|
$5,011,878
|
Loans
charged off:
|
|
|
Commercial
& industrial
|
0
|
(10,836)
|
Commercial
real estate
|
(160,207)
|
0
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
(4,735)
|
(192,549)
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
(15,311)
|
0
|
Consumer
loans
|
(63,791)
|
(23,973)
|
Total
loans charged off
|
(244,044)
|
(227,358)
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
Commercial
& industrial
|
4,318
|
20,475
|
Commercial
real estate
|
230
|
0
|
Residential
real estate - 1st lien
|
10,217
|
5,686
|
Residential
real estate - Jr lien
|
120
|
120
|
Consumer
loans
|
25,092
|
16,619
|
Total
recoveries
|
39,977
|
42,900
|
Net
loans charged off
|
(204,067)
|
(184,458)
|
Provision charged
to income
|
300,000
|
250,000
|
Allowance, end of
period
|
$5,374,378
|
$5,077,420
|
|
|
|
Net
charge offs to average loans outstanding
|
0.042%
|
0.040%
|
Provision charged
to income as a percent of average loans
|
0.061%
|
0.054%
|
Allowance to
average loans outstanding
|
1.099%
|
1.104%
|
Allowance to
non-accruing loans
|
201.616%
|
165.517%
|
Allowance to
non-accruing loans net of government guarantees
|
212.579%
|
173.987%
|
The
provision increased $50,000, or 20.0%, for the first six months of
2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The lower provision in
2016 was principally related to the comparatively low level of net
loan losses experienced during the first three months of 2016. The
first quarter 2017 provision supported higher losses driven by one
particular commercial real estate charge off. The decrease in the
size of the overall portfolio at March 31, 2017 compared to
year-end precluded the need for any additional first quarter
provision. The second quarter of 2017 saw light loan losses coupled
with strong loan growth and as such the provision remained on
budget at $300,000 year-to-date.
48
The
Company has an experienced collections department that continues to
work actively with borrowers to resolve problem loans and manage
the OREO portfolio, and management continues to monitor the loan
portfolio closely.
The
second quarter ALL analysis shows the reserve balance of $5,374,378
at June 30, 2017 is sufficient to cover losses that are probable
and estimable with an unallocated reserve of approximately
$360,000. The reserve balance and unallocated amount continue to be
directionally consistent with the overall risk profile of the
Company’s loan portfolio and credit risk appetite. The
portion of the ALL termed "unallocated" is established to absorb
inherent losses that exist as of the measurement date although not
specifically identified through management's process for estimating
credit losses. While the ALL is described as consisting of separate
allocated portions, the entire ALL is available to support loan
losses, regardless of category. Unallocated reserves are considered
by management to be appropriate in light of the Company’s
continued growth strategy and shift in the portfolio from
residential loans to commercial and commercial real estate loans
and the risk associated with the relatively new, unseasoned loans
in those portfolios. The adequacy of the ALL is reviewed quarterly
by the risk management committee of the Board of Directors and then
presented to the full Board of Directors for approval.
Market Risk - In addition to credit
risk in the Company’s loan portfolio and liquidity risk in
its loan and deposit-taking operations, the Company’s
business activities also generate market risk. Market risk is the
risk of loss in a financial instrument arising from adverse changes
in market prices and rates, foreign currency exchange rates,
commodity prices and equity prices. Declining capital markets can
result in fair value adjustments necessary to record decreases in
the value of the investment portfolio for
other-than-temporary-impairment. The Company does not have any
market risk sensitive instruments acquired for trading purposes.
The Company’s market risk arises primarily from interest rate
risk inherent in its lending and deposit taking activities. During
recessionary periods, a declining housing market can result in an
increase in loan loss reserves or ultimately an increase in
foreclosures. Interest rate risk is directly related to the
different maturities and repricing characteristics of
interest-bearing assets and liabilities, as well as to loan
prepayment risks, early withdrawal of time deposits, and the fact
that the speed and magnitude of responses to interest rate changes
vary by product. As discussed above under "Interest Rate Risk and
Asset and Liability Management", the Company actively monitors and
manages its interest rate risk through the ALCO
process.
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND OFF-BALANCE-SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS
The
Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet
risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs
of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments
to extend credit, standby letters of credit and risk-sharing
commitments on certain sold loans. Such instruments involve, to
varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in
excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The contract
or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of
involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial
instruments. During the first six months of 2017, the Company did
not engage in any activity that created any additional types of
off-balance sheet risk.
The
Company generally requires collateral or other security to support
financial instruments with credit risk. The Company's financial
instruments whose contract amount represents credit risk were as
follows:
|
Contract or Notional Amount
|
|
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Unused
portions of home equity lines of credit
|
$28,897,210
|
$25,535,104
|
Residential
construction lines of credit
|
3,856,723
|
3,676,176
|
Commercial real
estate and other construction lines of credit
|
36,544,468
|
25,951,345
|
Commercial and
industrial commitments
|
36,661,726
|
36,227,213
|
Other
commitments to extend credit
|
42,448,589
|
42,459,454
|
Standby letters of
credit and commercial letters of credit
|
1,870,247
|
2,009,788
|
Recourse on sale
of credit card portfolio
|
269,005
|
258,555
|
MPF
credit enhancement obligation, net of liability
recorded
|
596,101
|
748,239
|
Since
many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn
upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent
future cash requirements.
In
connection with its 2007 trust preferred securities financing, the
Company guaranteed the payment obligations under the $12,500,000 of
capital securities of its subsidiary, CMTV Statutory Trust I. The
source of funds for payments by the Trust on its capital securities
is payments made by the Company on its debentures issued to the
Trust. The Company's obligation under those debentures is fully
reflected in the Company's balance sheet, in the gross amount of
$12,887,000 for each of the comparison periods, of which
$12,500,000 represents external financing through the issuance to
investors of capital securities by CMTV Statutory Trust
I.
49
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Managing liquidity
risk is essential to maintaining both depositor confidence and
stability in earnings. Liquidity management refers to the ability
of the Company to adequately cover fluctuations in assets and
liabilities. Meeting loan demand (assets) and covering the
withdrawal of deposit funds (liabilities) are two key components of
the liquidity management process. The Company’s principal
sources of funds are deposits, amortization and prepayment of loans
and securities, maturities of investment securities, sales of loans
available-for-sale, and earnings and funds provided from
operations. Maintaining a relatively stable funding base, which is
achieved by diversifying funding sources, competitively pricing
deposit products, and extending the contractual maturity of
liabilities, reduces the Company’s exposure to roll over risk
on deposits and limits reliance on volatile short-term borrowed
funds. Short-term funding needs arise from declines in deposits or
other funding sources and from funding requirements for loan
commitments. The Company’s strategy is to fund assets to the
maximum extent possible with core deposits that provide a sizable
source of relatively stable and low-cost funds.
The
Company recognizes that, at times, when loan demand exceeds deposit
growth or the Company has other liquidity demands, it may be
desirable to utilize alternative sources of deposit funding to
augment retail deposits and borrowings. One-way deposits acquired
through the CDARS program provide an alternative funding source
when needed. Such deposits are generally considered a form of
brokered deposits.
At June 30, 2017, the Company had one-way CDARS outstanding
totaling $15,000,923 compared to no one way CDARS at December 31,
2016 and June 30, 2016. In addition, two-way CDARS deposits allow
the Company to provide Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
deposit insurance to its customers in excess of account coverage
limits by exchanging deposits with other CDARS members. At June 30,
2017, the Company reported $3,058,649 in two-way CDARS deposits,
representing exchanged deposits with other CDARS participating
banks, compared to $3,141,773 at December 31, 2016 and $2,865,275
at June 30, 2016. The balance in insured cash sweep (ICS)
reciprocal money market deposits was $13,110,607 at June 30, 2017,
compared to $11,909,300 at December 31, 2016 and $11,411,879 at
June 30, 2016, and the balance in ICS demand deposits was
$4,903,771, $5,706,882 and $5,954,280, respectively.
At
June 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, borrowing
capacity of $85,030,206, $68,163,543 and $71,600,549, respectively,
was available through the FHLBB, secured by the Company's
qualifying loan portfolio (generally, residential mortgage loans),
reduced by outstanding advances and by collateral pledges securing
FHLBB letters of credit collateralizing public unit deposits. The
Company also has an unsecured Federal Funds credit line with the
FHLBB with an available balance of $500,000 and no outstanding
advances during any of the respective comparison periods. Interest
is chargeable at a rate determined daily, approximately 25 basis
points higher than the rate paid on federal funds
sold.
The
following table reflects the Company’s outstanding FHLBB
advances against the respective lines as of the dates
indicated:
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
June 30,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2016
|
Long-Term Advances(1)
|
|
|
|
FHLBB
term advance, 0.00%, due February 26, 2021
|
$350,000
|
$350,000
|
$350,000
|
FHLBB
term advance, 0.00%, due November 22, 2021
|
1,000,000
|
1,000,000
|
0
|
FHLBB
term advance, 0.00%, due June 09, 2022
|
2,000,000
|
0
|
0
|
FHLBB
term advance, 0.00%, due September 22, 2023
|
200,000
|
200,000
|
0
|
|
3,550,000
|
1,550,000
|
350,000
|
Short-Term Advances
|
|
|
|
FHLBB
term advances, 0.77% and 0.65% fixed rate, due
|
|
|
|
February
8, 2017 and August 10, 2016, respectively
|
0
|
10,000,000
|
5,000,000
|
FHLBB
term advance 0.77% and 0.54% fixed rate, due
|
|
|
|
February
24, 2017 and August 24, 2016, respectively
|
0
|
10,000,000
|
10,000,000
|
FHLBB
term advance 0.92% and 0.54% fixed rate, due
|
|
|
|
June
14, 2017 and August 26, 2016, respectively
|
0
|
10,000,000
|
15,000,000
|
|
0
|
30,000,000
|
30,000,000
|
Overnight Borrowings
|
|
|
|
Federal funds
purchased (FHLBB), 1.30%
|
10,000,000
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
$13,550,000
|
$31,550,000
|
$30,350,000
|
(1)
The Company has
borrowed a total of $3,550,000 under the FHLBB’s Jobs for New
England (JNE) program, a program dedicated to supporting job growth
and economic development throughout New England. The FHLBB is
providing a subsidy, funded by the FHLBB’s earnings, to write
down interest rates to zero percent on advances that finance
qualifying loans to small businesses. JNE advances must support
small business in New England that create and/or retain jobs, or
otherwise contribute to overall economic development
activities.
50
The
Company has a Borrower-in-Custody (BIC) arrangement with the FRBB
secured by eligible commercial loans, commercial real estate loans
and home equity loans, resulting in an available credit line of
$62,615,763, $77,862,708, and $70,424,270, respectively, at June
30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016. Credit advances
under this FRBB lending program are overnight advances with
interest chargeable at the primary credit rate (generally referred
to as the discount rate), currently 175 basis points. The Company
had no outstanding advances against this credit line during any of
the periods presented.
The
Company has unsecured lines of credit with three correspondent
banks with aggregate available borrowing capacity totaling
$12,500,000 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and unsecured
lines of credit with two correspondent banks with aggregate
available borrowing capacity of $7,500,000 as of June 30, 2016.
There were no outstanding advances against any of these lines
during any of the respective comparison periods.
Securities sold
under agreements to repurchase provide another funding source for
the Company. At June 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016,
the Company had outstanding repurchase agreement balances of
$28,862,766, $30,423,195 and $26,837,466, respectively. These
repurchase agreements mature and are repriced daily.
The
following table illustrates the changes in shareholders' equity
from December 31, 2016 to June 30, 2017:
Balance at
December 31, 2016 (book value $10.27 per common share)
|
$54,451,517
|
Net
income
|
2,913,729
|
Issuance
of stock through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan
|
473,358
|
Dividends
declared on common stock
|
(1,722,227)
|
Dividends
declared on preferred stock
|
(48,438)
|
Unrealized
loss on available-for-sale securities during the period, net of
tax
|
(49,375)
|
Balance at June
30, 2017 (book value $10.54 per common share)
|
$56,117,314
|
The
primary objective of the Company’s capital planning process
is to balance appropriately the retention of capital to support
operations and future growth, with the goal of providing
shareholders an attractive return on their investment. To that end,
management monitors capital retention and dividend policies on an
ongoing basis.
As
described in more detail in the Company’s 2016 Annual Report
on Form 10-K in Note 20 to the audited consolidated financial
statements contained therein and under the caption “LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES” in the MD&A section of such
report, the Company (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are
subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by
the federal banking agencies pursuant to which they must meet
specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of
their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items.
Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative
judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and
other factors.
Beginning in 2016,
an additional capital conservation buffer has been added to the
minimum requirements for capital adequacy purposes, subject to a
three year phase-in period. The capital conservation buffer will be
fully phased-in on January 1, 2019 at 2.5 percent. A banking
organization with a conservation buffer of less than 2.5 percent
(or the required phase-in amount in years prior to 2019) will be
subject to limitations on capital distributions, including dividend
payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive
officers. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital
conservation buffer was 5.45% and 5.29%, respectively, at June 30,
2017. As of June 30, 2017, both the Company and the Bank exceeded
the required capital conservation buffer of 1.25% and, on a pro
forma basis, would be compliant with the fully phased-in capital
conservation buffer requirement.
As of
June 30, 2017, the Bank was considered well capitalized under the
regulatory capital framework for Prompt Corrective Action and the
Company exceeded applicable consolidated regulatory guidelines for
capital adequacy.
51
The
following table shows the Company’s actual capital ratios and
those of its subsidiary, as well as applicable regulatory capital
requirements, as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
To Be Well
|
||
|
|
|
For Capital
|
Capitalized Under
|
||
|
|
|
Adequacy
|
Prompt Corrective
|
||
|
Actual
|
Purposes:
|
Action Provisions(1):
|
|||
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|||||
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
equity tier 1 capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to
risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
$57,417
|
12.29%
|
$21,025
|
4.50%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Bank
|
$56,624
|
12.13%
|
$21,001
|
4.50%
|
$30,335
|
6.50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1
capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
$57,417
|
12.29%
|
$28,033
|
6.00%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Bank
|
$56,624
|
12.13%
|
$28,001
|
6.00%
|
$37,335
|
8.00%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
$62,835
|
13.45%
|
$37,378
|
8.00%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Bank
|
$62,042
|
13.29%
|
$37,335
|
8.00%
|
$46,669
|
10.00%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1
capital (to average assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
$57,417
|
9.05%
|
$25,370
|
4.00%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Bank
|
$56,624
|
8.93%
|
$25,352
|
4.00%
|
$31,690
|
5.00%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
equity tier 1 capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(to
risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
$55,690
|
12.34%
|
$20,304
|
4.50%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Bank
|
$55,120
|
12.23%
|
$20,274
|
4.50%
|
$29,285
|
6.50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1
capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
$55,690
|
12.34%
|
$27,072
|
6.00%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Bank
|
$55,120
|
12.23%
|
$27,032
|
6.00%
|
$36,043
|
8.00%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
$61,012
|
13.52%
|
$36,096
|
8.00%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Bank
|
$60,443
|
13.42%
|
$36,043
|
8.00%
|
$45,054
|
10.00%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1
capital (to average assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
$55,690
|
9.17%
|
$24,305
|
4.00%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Bank
|
$55,120
|
9.08%
|
$24,281
|
4.00%
|
$30,351
|
5.00%
|
(1)
Applicable to banks, but not bank holding companies.
52
The
Company's ability to pay dividends to its shareholders is largely
dependent on the Bank's ability to pay dividends to the Company. In
general, a national bank may not pay dividends that exceed net
income for the current and preceding two years regardless of
statutory restrictions, as a matter of regulatory policy, banks and
bank holding companies should pay dividends only out of current
earnings and only if, after paying such dividends, they remain
adequately capitalized.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
The
Company's management of the credit, liquidity and market risk
inherent in its business operations is discussed in Part 1, Item 2
of this report under the captions "CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION",
“COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND OFF-BALANCE-SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS” and “LIQUIDITY & CAPITAL
RESOURCES”, which are
incorporated herein by reference. Management does not believe that
there have been any material changes in the nature or categories of
the Company's risk exposures from those disclosed in the
Company’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management is
responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
As of June 30, 2017, an evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of management, including the
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation,
management concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures as
of June 30, 2017 were effective in ensuring that material
information required to be disclosed in the reports it files with
the Commission under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported on a timely basis.
For
this purpose, the term “disclosure controls and
procedures” means controls and other procedures of the
Company that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by it in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures
include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in
the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management,
including its principal executive and principal financial officers,
or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30,
2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
In the
normal course of business, the Company and its subsidiary are
involved in litigation that is considered incidental to their
business. Management does not expect that any such litigation will
be material to the Company's consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
The
Risk Factors identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2016, continue to represent the most
significant risks to the Company's future results of operations and
financial condition.
53
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
The
following table provides information as to the purchases of the
Company’s common stock during the three months ended June 30,
2017, by the Company or by any affiliated purchaser (as defined in
SEC Rule 10b-18). As of the period presented, there were no
Publicly Announced Plans of the Company requiring disclosure of the
“Total number of shares purchased as part of the publicly
announced plan” and the “maximum number of shares that
may yet be purchased under the plan at the end of the
period”.
|
Total
Number
|
Average
|
|
of
Shares
|
Price
Paid
|
For
the period:
|
Purchased(1)(2)
|
Per
Share
|
|
|
|
April
1 - April 30
|
0
|
$0.00
|
May 1
- May 30
|
3,530
|
17.00
|
June 1
- June 30
|
791
|
17.50
|
Total
|
4,321
|
$17.09
|
(1) All
4,321 shares were purchased for the account of participants
invested in the Company Stock Fund under the Company’s
Retirement Savings Plan by or on behalf of the Plan Trustee, the
Human Resources Committee of Community National Bank. Such share
purchases were facilitated through CFSG, which provides certain
investment advisory services to the Plan. Both the Plan Trustee and
CFSG may be considered affiliates of the Company under Rule
10b-18.
(2) Shares
purchased during the period do not include fractional shares
repurchased from time to time in connection with the participant's
election to discontinue participation in the Company's Dividend
Reinvestment Plan.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
The
following exhibits are filed with this report:
Exhibit 31.1 -
Certification from the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) of the Company pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 31.2 -
Certification from the Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of
the Company pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
Exhibit 32.1 -
Certification from the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002*
Exhibit 32.2 -
Certification from the Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of
the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002*
Exhibit 101--The
following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 formatted in
eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the unaudited
consolidated balance sheets, (ii) the unaudited consolidated
statements of income for the three and six month interim periods
ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, (iii) the unaudited consolidated
statements of comprehensive income, (iv) the unaudited consolidated
statements of cash flows and (v) related notes.
* This
exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COMMUNITY
BANCORP.
DATED:
August 11, 2017
|
/s/Kathryn M.
Austin
|
|
|
Kathryn M. Austin,
President
|
|
|
&
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
DATED:
August 11, 2017
|
/s/Louise M.
Bonvechio
|
|
|
Louise
M. Bonvechio, Corporate
|
|
|
Secretary &
Treasurer
|
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
55
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC
20549
FORM 10-Q
[ x ] QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2017
COMMUNITY BANCORP.
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
31.1
|
Certification from
the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the
Company pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
Exhibit
31.2
|
Certification from
the Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company pursuant
to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
Exhibit
32.1
|
Certification from
the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the
Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
Exhibit
32.2
|
Certification from
the Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company pursuant
to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
101
|
The
following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 formatted in
eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the unaudited
consolidated balance sheets, (ii) the unaudited consolidated
statements of income for the six month interim periods ended June
30, 2017 and 2016, (iii) the unaudited consolidated statements of
comprehensive income, (iv) the unaudited consolidated statements of
cash flows and (v) related notes.
|
* This
exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
56