COMPX INTERNATIONAL INC - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 – For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
Commission
file number 1-13905
COMPX
INTERNATIONAL INC.
|
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
Delaware
|
57-0981653
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
|
5430
LBJ Freeway, Suite 1700,
Three
Lincoln Centre, Dallas, Texas
|
75240-2697
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code
|
(972)
448-1400
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
||
Title of each class
|
Name
of each exchange
on which registered
|
|
Class
A common stock
($.01
par value per share)
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None.
|
||
Indicate
by check mark:
If the
Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act. Yes £ No
S
If the
Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section
15(d) of the Act. Yes £ No
S
Whether
the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes S No
£
If
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
£
Whether
the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a
non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Large
accelerated filer £ Accelerated
filer £ Non-accelerated
filer S Smaller
reporting company £
Whether
the Registrant is a shell Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes £ No
S
- 1
-
The
aggregate market value of the 1.4 million shares of voting stock held by
nonaffiliates of CompX International Inc. as of June 30, 2008 (the last business
day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter)
approximated $8.3 million.
As of
February 23, 2009, 2,361,307 shares of Class A common stock were
outstanding.
Documents incorporated by
reference
The
information required by Part III is incorporated by reference from the
Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant
to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year
covered by this report.
- 2
-
PART
I
ITEM
1. BUSINESS
General
CompX
International Inc. (NYSE:CIX), incorporated in Delaware in 1993, is a leading
manufacturer of security products, precision ball bearing slides, and ergonomic
computer support systems used in the office furniture, transportation, postal,
tool storage, appliance and a variety of other industries. We are
also a leading manufacturer of stainless steel exhaust systems, gauges, and
throttle controls for the performance marine industry. Our products are
principally designed for use in medium to high-end product applications, where
design, quality and durability are valued by our customers.
At
December 31, 2008, (i) NL Industries, Inc. (NYSE: NL) owned 87% of our
outstanding common stock; (ii) Valhi, Inc. (NYSE: VHI) holds approximately 83%
of NL’s outstanding common stock; and (iii) subsidiaries of Contran Corporation
hold approximately 94% of Valhi's outstanding common stock. Substantially all of
Contran's outstanding voting stock is held by trusts established for the benefit
of certain children and grandchildren of Harold C. Simmons, (for which Mr.
Simmons is sole trustee) or is held by Mr. Simmons or other persons or related
companies to Mr. Simmons. Consequently, Mr. Simmons may be deemed to
control each of these companies and us.
Our
corporate offices are located at Three Lincoln Centre, 5430 LBJ Freeway, Suite
1700, Dallas, Texas 75240. Our telephone number is (972)
448-1400. We maintain a website at www.compx.com.
Unless
otherwise indicated, references in this report to “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to
CompX International Inc. and its subsidiaries taken as a whole.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K that are not historical in nature are forward-looking in
nature about our future, and are not statements of historical fact. Such
statements are found in this report, including, but not limited to, statements
found in Item 1 – "Business," Item 1A – “Risk Factors,” Item 3 - "Legal
Proceedings," Item 7 - "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" and Item 7A - "Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk." These statements are forward-looking statements
that represent our beliefs and assumptions based on currently available
information. In some cases you can identify these forward-looking
statements by the use of words such as "believes," "intends," "may,"
"should," "could," "anticipates," "expects" or comparable
terminology or by discussions of strategies or trends. Although we
believe the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are reasonable,
we do not know if these expectations will be correct. Forward-looking
statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties that
could significantly impact expected results. Actual future results
could differ materially from those predicted. Among the factors that
could cause actual future results to differ materially from those described
herein are the risks and uncertainties discussed in this Annual Report and those
described from time to time in our other filings with the SEC including, but not
limited to, the following:
·
|
Future
supply and demand for our products,
|
·
|
Changes
in our raw material and other operating costs (such as steel and energy
costs),
|
·
|
General
global economic and political conditions (such as changes in the level of
gross domestic product in various regions of the
world),
|
·
|
Demand
for office furniture,
|
·
|
Service
industry employment levels,
|
·
|
Demand
for high performance marine
components,
|
·
|
Competitive
products and prices, including competition from low-cost manufacturing
sources (such as China),
|
·
|
Substitute
products,
|
·
|
Customer
and competitor strategies,
|
·
|
The
introduction of trade barriers,
|
·
|
The
impact of pricing and production
decisions,
|
·
|
Fluctuations
in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies (such as the
Canadian dollar and New Taiwan
dollar),
|
·
|
Potential
difficulties in integrating completed or future
acquisitions,
|
·
|
Decisions
to sell operating assets other than in the ordinary course of
business,
|
·
|
Uncertainties
associated with the development of new product
features,
|
·
|
Environmental
matters (such as those requiring emission and discharge standards for
existing and new facilities),
|
·
|
Our
ability to comply with covenants contained in our revolving bank credit
facility,
|
·
|
The
ultimate outcome of income tax audits, tax settlement initiatives or other
tax matters,
|
·
|
The
impact of current or future government
regulations,
|
·
|
Possible
future litigation,
|
·
|
Possible
disruption of our business or increases in the cost of doing business
resulting from terrorist activities or global conflicts;
and
|
·
|
Operating
interruptions (including, but not limited to labor disputes, leaks,
natural disasters, fires, explosions, unscheduled or unplanned downtime
and transportation interruptions).
|
- 3
-
Should
one or more of these risks materialize or if the consequences worsen, or if the
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results could differ materially
from those currently forecasted or expected. We disclaim any
intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement
whether as a result of changes in information, future events or
otherwise.
Industry
Overview
We
manufacture components that are sold to a variety of industries including office
furniture, recreational transportation (including performance boats), mailboxes,
tool boxes, appliances, banking equipment, vending equipment and computers and
related equipment. Approximately 33% of our total sales in 2008 are
to the office furniture manufacturing industry, compared to 32% in 2007 and 36%
in 2006. The decrease in the percentage of sales to the office
furniture industry from 2006 is partially the result of our strategy to
diversify our sales in order to strengthen our customer base. We
believe that our emphasis on new product features and sales of our products to
additional markets has resulted in our potential for higher rates of earnings
growth and diversification of risk. See also Item 6 – "Selected
Financial Data" and Item 7 – "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations."
Business
Segments
We
currently have three operating business segments – Security Products, Furniture
Components, and Marine Components. For additional information
regarding our segments, see “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 2 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Manufacturing,
Operations, and Products
Security Products. Our Security
Products segment, with a manufacturing facility in South Carolina and a facility
in Illinois shared with Marine Components, manufactures locking mechanisms and
other security products for sale to the postal, transportation, office
furniture, banking, vending, and other industries. We believe we are
a North American market leader in the manufacture and sale of cabinet locks and
other locking mechanisms. Our security products are used in a variety
of applications including ignition systems, mailboxes, vending and gaming
machines, parking meters, electrical circuit panels, storage compartments,
office furniture and medical cabinet security. These products
include:
·
|
disc
tumbler locks which provide moderate security and generally represent the
lowest cost lock to produce;
|
·
|
pin
tumbler locking mechanisms which are more costly to produce and are used
in applications requiring higher levels of security, including our KeSet high security
system, which allows the user to change the keying on a single lock 64
times without removing the lock from its enclosure;
and
|
·
|
our
innovative eLock electronic locks which provide stand alone security and
audit trail capability for drug storage and other valuables through the
use of a proximity card, magnetic stripe, or keypad
credentials.
|
- 4
-
A
substantial portion of our Security Products’ sales consist of products with
specialized adaptations to an individual manufacturer’s specifications, some of
which are listed above. We also have a standardized product line
suitable for many customers which is offered through a North American
distribution network to lock distributors and smaller original equipment
manufacturers (“OEMs”) via our STOCK LOCKS distribution
program.
Furniture
Components. Our Furniture Components segment, with facilities
in Canada, Michigan and Taiwan, manufactures a complete line of precision ball
bearing slides and ergonomic computer support systems for use in applications
such as computer related equipment, appliances, tool storage cabinets, imaging
equipment, file cabinets, desk drawers, automated teller machines and other
applications. These products include:
·
|
our
patented Integrated
Slide Lock which allows a file cabinet manufacturer to reduce the
possibility of multiple drawers being opened at the same
time;
|
·
|
our
patented adjustable Ball
Lock which reduces the risk of heavily-filled drawers, such as auto
mechanic tool boxes, from opening while in
movement;
|
·
|
our
Self-Closing
Slide, which is designed to assist in closing a drawer and is used
in applications such as bottom mount
freezers;
|
·
|
articulating
computer keyboard support arms (designed to attach to desks in the
workplace and home office environments to alleviate possible user strains
and stress and maximize usable workspace), along with our patented LeverLock keyboard arm,
which is designed to make ergonomic adjustments to the keyboard arm
easier;
|
·
|
CPU
storage devices which minimize adverse effects of dust and moisture;
and
|
·
|
complementary
accessories, such as ergonomic wrist rest aids, mouse pad supports and
flat screen computer monitor support
arms.
|
Marine Components. Our Marine
Components segment, with a facility in Wisconsin and a facility in Illinois
shared with Security Products, manufactures and distributes marine instruments,
hardware and accessories for performance boats. Our specialty marine
component products are high performance components designed to operate within
precise tolerances in the highly corrosive marine environment. These
products include:
·
|
original
equipment and aftermarket stainless steel exhaust headers, exhaust pipes,
mufflers and other exhaust
components;
|
·
|
high
performance gauges such as GPS speedometers and
tachometers;
|
·
|
controls,
throttles, steering wheels and other billet accessories;
and
|
·
|
dash
panels, LED lighting, rigging and other
accessories.
|
Our
business segments operated six manufacturing facilities at December 31, 2008
including one facility in Grayslake, Illinois that houses operations relating to
Security Products and Marine Components. For additional information,
see also “Item 2 – Properties”, including information regarding leased and
distribution-only facilities.
Security Products
|
Furniture Components
|
Marine Components
|
||
Mauldin,
SC
Grayslake,
IL
|
Kitchener,
Ontario
Byron
Center, MI
Taipei,
Taiwan
|
Neenah,
WI
Grayslake,
IL
|
- 5
-
Raw
Materials
Our
primary raw materials are:
·
|
zinc,
copper and brass (used in the Security Products segment for the
manufacture of locking mechanisms);
|
·
|
coiled
steel (used in the Furniture Components segment for the manufacture of
precision ball bearing slides and ergonomic computer support
systems);
|
·
|
stainless
steel (used in the Marine Components segment for the manufacture of
exhaust headers and pipes and other components;
and
|
·
|
plastic
resins (used primarily in the Furniture Components segment for injection
molded plastics employed in the manufacturing of ergonomic computer
support systems).
|
These raw
materials are purchased from several suppliers and are readily available from
numerous sources.
We
occasionally enter into raw material arrangements to mitigate the short-term
impact of future increases in raw material costs. While these
arrangements do not necessarily commit us to a minimum volume of purchases, they
generally provide for stated unit prices based upon achievement of specified
purchase volumes. We utilize purchase arrangements to stabilize our
raw material prices provided we meet the specified minimum monthly purchase
quantities. Raw materials purchased outside of these arrangements are sometimes
subject to unanticipated and sudden price increases. Due to the competitive
nature of the markets served by our products, it is often difficult to recover
all increases in raw material costs through increased product selling prices or
raw material surcharges. Consequently, overall operating margins can
be affected by raw material cost pressures. All of our primary raw
materials are impacted by related commodity markets where prices are cyclical,
reflecting overall economic trends and specific developments in consuming
industries.
Patents
and Trademarks
We hold a
number of patents relating to our component products, certain of which are
believed to be important to us and our continuing business
activity. Patents generally have a term of 20 years, and our patents
have remaining terms ranging from less than one year to 15 years at December 31,
2008. Our major trademarks and brand names include:
Furniture
Components
|
Security
Products
|
Marine
Components
|
||
CompX
Precision Slides®
|
CompX
Security Products®
|
Custom
Marine®
|
||
CompX
Waterloo®
|
National
Cabinet Lock®
|
Livorsi
Marine®
|
||
CompX
ErgonomX®
|
Fort
Lock®
|
CMI
Industrial Mufflers™
|
||
CompX
DurISLide®
|
Timberline®
|
Custom
Marine Stainless
|
||
Dynaslide®
|
Chicago
Lock®
|
Exhaust™
|
||
Waterloo
Furniture
|
STOCK
LOCKS®
|
The
#1 Choice in
|
||
Components
Limited®
|
KeSet®
|
Performance
Boating®
|
||
TuBar®
|
Mega
Rim™
|
|||
ACE
II®
|
Race
Rim™
|
|||
CompX
eLock®
|
CompX
Marine™
|
|||
Lockview®
Software
|
Sales, Marketing
and Distribution.
We sell
components directly to large OEM customers through our factory-based sales and
marketing professionals and with engineers working in concert with field
salespeople and independent manufacturers' representatives. We select
manufacturers' representatives based on special skills in certain markets or
relationships with current or potential customers.
A
significant portion of our sales are also made through
distributors. We have a significant market share of cabinet lock
sales as a result of the locksmith distribution channel. We support
our distributor sales with a line of standardized products used by the largest
segments of the marketplace. These products are packaged and merchandised for
easy availability and handling by distributors and end users. Due to
our success with the STOCK
LOCKS inventory program within the Security Products segment, similar
programs have been implemented for distributor sales of ergonomic computer
support systems within the Furniture Components segment.
- 6
-
In 2008,
our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 35% of our total sales;
however, no one customer accounted for sales of 10% or more in
2008. Of the 35%, 15% was related to Security Products and 20% was
related to Furniture Components. Overall, our customer base is
diverse and the loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse
effect on our operations.
Competition
The
markets in which we participate are highly competitive. We compete
primarily on the basis of product design, including ergonomic and aesthetic
factors, product quality and durability, price, on-time delivery, service and
technical support. We focus our efforts on the middle and high-end
segments of the market, where product design, quality, durability and service
are valued by the customer.
Our
Marine Components segment competes with small domestic manufacturers and is
minimally affected by foreign competitors. Our Security Products and
Furniture Components segments compete against a number of domestic and foreign
manufacturers. Suppliers, particularly Asian based furniture
component suppliers, have put intense price pressure on our
products. In some cases, we have lost sales to these lower cost
manufacturers. We have responded by
·
|
shifting
the manufacture of some products to our lower cost
facilities,
|
·
|
working
to reduce costs and gain operational efficiencies through workforce
reductions and lean process improvements in all of our facilities,
and
|
·
|
by
working with our customers to be their value-added supplier of choice by
offering customer support services which Asian based suppliers are
generally unable to provide.
|
International
Operations
We have
substantial operations and assets located outside the United States, principally
Furniture Component operations in Canada and Taiwan. The majority of
our 2008 non-U.S. sales are to customers located in Canada. These
operations are subject to, among other things, currency exchange rate
fluctuations. Our results of operations have in the past been both
favorably and unfavorably affected by fluctuations in currency exchange
rates. Political and economic uncertainties in certain of the
countries in which we operate may expose us to risk of loss. We do
not believe that there is currently any likelihood of material loss through
political or economic instability, seizure, nationalization or similar
event. We cannot predict, however, whether events of this type in the
future could have a material effect on our operations. See Item 7 -
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations," Item 7A – "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk" and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Regulatory
and Environmental Matters
Our
operations are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations
relating to the use, storage, handling, generation, transportation, treatment,
emission, discharge, disposal, remediation of and exposure to hazardous and
non-hazardous substances, materials and wastes ("Environmental
Laws"). Our operations also are subject to federal, state, local and
foreign laws and regulations relating to worker health and safety. We
believe that we are in substantial compliance with all such laws and
regulations. To date, the costs of maintaining compliance with such
laws and regulations have not significantly impacted our results. We
currently do not anticipate any significant costs or expenses relating to such
matters; however, it is possible future laws and regulations may require us to
incur significant additional expenditures.
- 7
-
Employees
As of
December 31, 2008, we employed the following number of people:
United
States
|
658
|
Canada(1)
|
237
|
Taiwan
|
81
|
Total
|
976
|
(1) Approximately
75% of our Canadian employees are represented by a labor union covered by a
collective bargaining agreement. A new collective bargaining
agreement, providing for wage increases from 0% to 1%, was ratified in January
2009 and expires January 2012.
We
believe our labor relations are good at all of our facilities.
Available
Information
Our
fiscal year end is always the Sunday closest to December 31, and our operations
are reported on a 52 or 53-week fiscal year. We furnish our
stockholders with annual reports containing audited financial
statements. In addition, we file annual, quarterly and current
reports, proxy and information statements and other information with the
SEC. We also make our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports
on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all related amendments, available
free of charge through our website at www.compx.com as soon
as reasonably practical after they have been filed with the SEC. We
also provide to anyone, without charge, copies of the documents upon written
request. Requests should be directed to the attention of the
Corporate Secretary at our address on the cover page of this Form
10-K.
Additional
information, including our Audit Committee Charter, our Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, can also be found on our
website. Information contained on our website is not a part of this
Annual Report.
The
general public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s
Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The
public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We are an electronic
filer. The SEC maintains an Internet website at www.sec.gov that
contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including
us.
Item
1A. RISK
FACTORS
Listed
below are certain risk factors associated with us and our
businesses. In addition to the potential effect of these risk factors
discussed below, any risk factor which could result in reduced earnings or
operating losses, or reduced liquidity, could in turn adversely affect our
ability to service our liabilities or pay dividends on our common stock or
adversely affect the quoted market prices for our securities.
Many of the markets in which we
operate are mature and highly competitive resulting in pricing pressure and the
need to continuously reduce costs.
Many of
the markets we serve are highly competitive, with a number of competitors
offering similar products. We focus our efforts on the middle and
high-end segment of the market where we feel that we can compete due to the
importance of product design, quality and durability to the
customer. However, our ability to effectively compete is impacted by
a number of factors. The occurrence of any of these factors could
result in reduced earnings or operating losses.
·
|
Competitors
may be able to drive down prices for our products because their costs are
lower than our costs, especially those sourced from
Asia.
|
·
|
Competitors'
financial, technological and other resources may be greater than our
resources, which may enable them to more effectively withstand changes in
market conditions.
|
·
|
Competitors
may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or emerging
technologies and changes in customer
requirements.
|
·
|
Consolidation
of our competitors or customers in any of the markets in which we compete
may result in reduced demand for our
products.
|
·
|
New
competitors could emerge by modifying their existing production facilities
to manufacture products that compete with our
products.
|
·
|
Our
ability to sustain a cost structure that enables us to be
cost-competitive.
|
·
|
Our
ability to adjust costs relative to our
pricing.
|
·
|
Customers
may no longer value our product design, quality or durability over lower
cost products of our competitors.
|
- 8
-
Sales for certain precision slides
and ergonomic products are concentrated in the office furniture industry, which
has periodically experienced significant reductions in demand that could result
in reduced earnings or operating losses.
Sales of
our products to the office furniture manufacturing industry accounted for
approximately 33%, 32% and 36% for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, of our net
sales. The future growth, if any, of the office furniture industry
will be affected by a variety of macroeconomic factors, such as service industry
employment levels, corporate cash flows and non-residential commercial
construction, as well as industry factors such as corporate reengineering and
restructuring, technology demands, ergonomic, health and safety concerns and
corporate relocations. There can be no assurance that current or future economic
or industry trends will not materially and adversely affect our
business.
Our
failure to enter into new markets with our current businesses would result in
the continued significant impact of fluctuations in demand within the office
furniture manufacturing industry on our operating results.
In an
effort to reduce our dependence on the office furniture market for certain
products and to increase our participation in other markets, we have been
devoting resources to identify new customers and develop new applications for
those products in markets outside of the office furniture industry, such as home
appliances, tool boxes and server racks. Developing these new
applications for our products involves substantial risk and uncertainties due to
our limited experience with customers and applications in these markets as well
as facing competitors who are already established in these
markets. We may not be successful in developing new customers or
applications for our products outside of the office furniture
industry. Significant time may be required to develop new
applications and uncertainty exists as to the extent to which we will face
competition in this regard.
Our development of innovative
features for current products is critical to sustaining and growing our
sales.
Historically,
our ability to provide value-added custom engineered products that address
requirements of technology and space utilization has been a key element of our
success. We spend a significant amount of time and effort to refine,
improve and adapt our existing products for new customers and
applications. Since expenditures for these types of activities are
not considered research and development expense under accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, the amount of our research
and development expenditures, which is not significant, is not indicative of the
overall effort involved in the development of new product
features. The introduction of new product features requires the
coordination of the design, manufacturing and marketing of the new product
features with current and potential customers. The ability to
coordinate these activities with current and potential customers may be affected
by factors beyond our control. While we will continue to emphasize
the introduction of innovative new product features that target
customer-specific opportunities, there can be no assurance that any new product
features we introduce will achieve the same degree of success that we have
achieved with our existing products. Introduction of new product
features typically requires us to increase production volume on a timely basis
while maintaining product quality. Manufacturers often encounter
difficulties in increasing production volumes, including delays, quality control
problems and shortages of qualified personnel or raw materials. As we
attempt to introduce new product features in the future, there can be no
assurance that we will be able to increase production volume without
encountering these or other problems, which might negatively impact our
financial condition or results of operations.
- 9
-
Recent
and future acquisitions could subject us to a number of operational
risks.
A key
component of our strategy is to grow and diversify our business through
acquisitions. Our ability to successfully execute this component of
our strategy entails a number of risks, including:
·
|
the
identification of suitable growth
opportunities;
|
·
|
an
inaccurate assessment of acquired liabilities that were undisclosed or not
properly disclosed;
|
·
|
the
entry into markets in which we may have limited or no
experience;
|
·
|
the
diversion of management’s attention from our core
businesses;
|
·
|
the
potential loss of key employees or customers of the acquired
businesses;
|
·
|
difficulties
in realizing projected efficiencies, synergies and cost savings;
and
|
·
|
an
increase in our indebtedness and a limitation in our ability to access
additional capital
when needed.
|
Higher
costs of our raw materials may decrease our liquidity.
Certain
of the raw materials used in our products are commodities that are subject to
significant fluctuations in price in response to world-wide supply and
demand. Coiled steel is the major raw material used in the
manufacture of precision ball bearing slides and ergonomic computer support
systems. Plastic resins for injection molded plastics are also an
integral material for ergonomic computer support systems. Zinc is a
principal raw material used in the manufacture of security
products. Stainless steel tubing is the major raw material used in
the manufacture of marine exhaust systems. These raw materials are
purchased from several suppliers and are generally readily available from
numerous sources. We occasionally enter into raw material supply
arrangements to mitigate the short-term impact of future increases in raw
material costs. Materials purchased outside of these arrangements are
sometimes subject to unanticipated and sudden price increases. Should
our vendors not be able to meet their contractual obligations or should we be
otherwise unable to obtain necessary raw materials, we may incur higher costs
for raw materials or may be required to reduce production levels, either of
which may decrease our liquidity as we may be unable to offset the higher costs
with increased selling prices for our products.
Negative
worldwide economic conditions could continue to result in a decrease in our
sales and an increase in our operating costs, which could continue to adversely
affect our business and operating results.
If the
current worldwide economic downturn continues, many of our direct and indirect
customers may continue to delay or reduce their purchases of the components we
manufacture or products that utilize our components. In addition, many of our
customers rely on credit financing for their working capital needs. If the
negative conditions in the global credit markets continue to prevent our
customers' access to credit, product orders may continue to decrease which could
result in lower sales. Likewise, if our suppliers continue to face challenges in
obtaining credit, in selling their products or otherwise in operating their
businesses, they may become unable to continue to offer the materials we use to
manufacture our products. These actions could continue to result in reductions
in our sales, increased price competition and increased operating costs, which
could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Negative
global economic conditions increase the risk that we could suffer unrecoverable
losses on our customers' accounts receivable which would adversely affect our
financial results.
We extend
credit and payment terms to some of our customers. Although we have an ongoing
process of evaluating our customers' financial condition, we could suffer
significant losses if a customer fails and is unable to pay us. A significant
loss of an accounts receivable would have a negative impact on our financial
results.
- 10
-
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF
COMMENTS
None.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
Our
principal executive offices are located in approximately 1,000 square feet
of leased space at 5430 LBJ Freeway, Dallas,
Texas 75240. The following table sets forth the location,
size, business operating segment and general product types produced for each of
our operating facilities.
Facility Name
|
Business
Segment
|
Location
|
Size
(square
feet)
|
Products Produced
|
|||
Owned Facilities:
|
|||||||
Waterloo(1)
|
FC
|
Kitchener,
Ontario
|
276,000 |
Slides/ergonomic
products
|
|||
Durislide(1)
|
FC
|
Byron
Center, MI
|
143,000 |
Slides
|
|||
National
(1)
|
SP
|
Mauldin,
SC
|
198,000 |
Security
products
|
|||
Dynaslide(2)
|
FC
|
Taipei,
Taiwan
|
45,500 |
Slides
|
|||
Custom(2)
|
MC
|
Neenah,
WI
|
95,000 |
Specialty
marine products
|
|||
Fort,
Timberline and Livorsi(1)
|
SP/MC
|
Grayslake,
IL
|
120,000 |
Security
products/specialty marine products
|
|||
Leased Facilities:
|
|||||||
Dynaslide
|
FC
|
Taipei,
Taiwan
|
36,000 |
Slides
|
|||
Dynaslide
|
FC
|
Taipei,
Taiwan
|
22,000 |
Slides
|
|||
Distribution
Center
|
SP/FC/MC
|
Rancho
Cucamonga, CA
|
12,000 |
Product
distribution
|
|||
FC –
Furniture Components business segment
SP –
Security Products business segment
MC –
Marine Components business segment
(1) ISO-9001
registered facilities
(2) ISO-9002
registered facilities
We believe
all of our facilities are well maintained and satisfactory for their intended
purposes.
ITEM
3. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
We are
involved, from time to time, in various environmental, contractual, product
liability, patent (or intellectual property) and other claims and disputes
incidental to our business. In addition to the information that is
included below, we have included certain of the information called for by this
Item in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and we are
incorporating that information here by reference. On February
10,2009, a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission
(“ITC”) by Humanscale Corporation alleging the unlawful importation of certain
adjustable keyboard support systems and components into the U.S. by us and our
Canadian subsidiary, CompX Waterloo. Additionally, on February 13,
2009, a complaint for patent infringement was filed in the United States
District Court by Humanscale against us and CompX Waterloo. We have
not been served in this matter as of the date of the filing of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, however, we deny the allegations of patent
infringement. Currently no material environmental or other material
litigation is pending or, to our knowledge, threatened. We currently
believe that the disposition of all claims and disputes, individually or in the
aggregate, should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
- 11
-
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
PART
II
ITEM
5. MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
Common Stock and
Dividends. Our Class A common stock is listed and traded on the New York
Stock Exchange (symbol: CIX). As of February 23, 2009, there were
approximately 16 holders of record of CompX Class A common stock. The
following table sets forth the high and low closing sales prices per share for
our Class A common stock for the periods indicated, according to Bloomberg, and
dividends paid during each period. On February 23, 2009, the closing
price per share of our Class A common stock was $4.99.
High
|
Low
|
Dividends
paid
|
||||||||||
Year
ended December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||
First
Quarter
|
$ | 20.44 | $ | 15.19 | $ | .125 | ||||||
Second
Quarter
|
20.37 | 16.00 | .125 | |||||||||
Third
Quarter
|
20.87 | 14.23 | .125 | |||||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
20.13 | 12.05 | .125 | |||||||||
Year
ended December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||
First
Quarter
|
$ | 14.62 | $ | 8.07 | $ | .125 | ||||||
Second
Quarter
|
9.20 | 5.01 | .125 | |||||||||
Third
Quarter
|
7.70 | 5.02 | .125 | |||||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
7.53 | 4.76 | .125 | |||||||||
January 1, 2008 through
February 23, 2009
|
$ | 5.80 | $ | 4.99 | $ | - |
We paid
regular quarterly dividends of $.125 per share during 2007 and
2008. In February of 2009, our board of directors declared a first
quarter 2009 dividend of $.125 per share, to be paid on March 24, 2009 to CompX
shareholders of record as of March 10, 2009. However, declaration and
payment of future dividends and the amount thereof, if any, is discretionary and
is dependent upon our results of operations, financial condition, cash
requirements for our businesses, contractual requirements and restrictions and
other factors deemed relevant by our board of
directors. The amount and timing of past dividends is not
necessarily indicative of the amount or timing of any future dividends which we
might pay. In this regard, our revolving bank credit facility places
certain restrictions on the payment of dividends. We are limited to (i) a $.125
per share quarterly dividend, not to exceed $8.0 million in any calendar year,
plus (ii) $20.0 million plus 50% of net income since September 30, 2008 over the
term of the credit facility.
- 12
-
Performance
Graph. Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly
change in our cumulative total stockholder returns on our Class A common stock
against the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000 Index and an index of a
self-selected peer group of companies for the period from December 31, 2003
through December 31, 2008. The peer group index is comprised of The
Eastern Company and Leggett & Platt Inc. The graph shows the
value at December 31 of each year assuming an original investment of $100 at
December 31, 2003 and reinvestment of dividends.
December
31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CompX
International Inc.
|
$ | 100 | $ | 260 | $ | 260 | $ | 337 | $ | 251 | $ | 98 | ||||||||||||
Russell
2000 Index
|
100 | 118 | 124 | 146 | 144 | 95 | ||||||||||||||||||
Peer
Group
|
100 | 134 | 112 | 120 | 92 | 83 |
Equity
compensation
plan information. We
have an equity compensation plan, approved by our stockholders, which provides
for the discretionary grant to our employees and directors of, among other
things, options to purchase our Class A common stock and stock
awards. As of December 31, 2008, there were 134,000 options
outstanding to purchase an equivalent number of shares of our Class A common
stock, and approximately 878,820 shares of our Class A common stock were
available for future grant or issuance. We do not have any equity
compensation plans that were not approved by our stockholders. See
Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Treasury Stock
Purchases. Our board of directors
has previously authorized the repurchase of our Class A common stock in open
market transactions, including block purchases, or in privately-negotiated
transactions at unspecified prices and over an unspecified period of time, which
may include transactions with our affiliates. We may repurchase our
common stock from time to time as market conditions permit. The stock
repurchase program does not include specific price targets or timetables and may
be suspended at any time. Depending on market conditions, we may
terminate the program prior to its completion. We will use cash on
hand to acquire the shares. Repurchased shares will be added to our
treasury and cancelled. We did not purchase any shares of our common stock
during the fourth quarter of 2008. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
- 13
-
ITEM
6. SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The
following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our
Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 7 - "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Our
fiscal year end is always the Sunday closest to December 31, and our operations
are reported on a 52 or 53-week fiscal year. 2004 was a 53-week year,
all other years shown are 52-week years.
Years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
($
in millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Statements
of Operations Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 182.6 | $ | 186.3 | $ | 190.1 | $ | 177.7 | $ | 165.5 | ||||||||||
Gross
Margin
|
39.8 | 43.8 | 46.5 | 45.2 | 40.3 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
15.4 | 19.1 | 20.3 | 15.6 | 6.2 | (1) | ||||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
7.8 | 18.6 | 9.7 | 6.9 | 7.2 | |||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
9.5 | 0.9 | 11.7 | 9.0 | (3.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued
operations
|
(12.5 | ) | (0.5 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (3.0 | ) | $ | 0.4 | $ | 11.7 | $ | 9.0 | $ | (3.1 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted
Earnings Per Share Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing
operations
|
$ | .63 | $ | .06 | $ | .76 | $ | .61 | $ | (.25 | ) | |||||||||
Discontinued
operations
|
(.83 | ) | (.03 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
$ | (.20 | ) | $ | .03 | $ | .76 | $ | .61 | $ | (.25 | ) | |||||||||
Cash
dividends
|
$ | .125 | $ | .50 | $ | .50 | $ | .50 | $ | .50 | ||||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
15.2 | 15.2 | 15.3 | 14.8 | 12.4 | |||||||||||||||
Balance
Sheet Data (at year end):
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
and other current assets
|
$ | 78.3 | $ | 80.8 | $ | 76.2 | $ | 68.2 | $ | 59.5 | ||||||||||
Total
assets
|
186.3 | 188.6 | 192.0 | 187.7 | 163.4 | |||||||||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
26.0 | 20.3 | 17.8 | 18.9 | 17.0 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt and note payable to affiliate, including current
maturities
|
0.1 | 1.6 | - | 50.0 | 43.0 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
155.3 | 150.1 | 153.7 | 104.1 | 91.3 | |||||||||||||||
Statements
of Cash Flow Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
provided by (used in):
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
activities
|
$ | 30.2 | $ | 20.0 | $ | 27.4 | $ | 11.9 | $ | 15.7 | ||||||||||
Investing
activities
|
(3.2 | ) | (3.7 | ) | (19.3 | ) | (12.4 | ) | (5.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Financing
activities
|
(27.1 | ) | (7.2 | ) | (8.8 | ) | (11.7 | ) | (14.2 | ) |
(1)
Includes a $9.9 million goodwill impairment charge related to our Marine
Components Segment. See Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
- 14
-
ITEM
7. MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Business
Overview
We are a
leading manufacturer of security products, precision ball bearing slides, and
ergonomic computer support systems used in the office furniture, transportation,
postal, tool storage, home appliance and a variety of other
industries. We are also a leading manufacturer of stainless steel
exhaust systems, gauges and throttle controls for the performance boat
industry.
Operating
Income Overview
We
reported operating income of $6.2 million in 2008 compared to operating income
of $15.6 million in 2007 and $20.3 million in 2006. Our 2008 results
include a $9.9 million goodwill impairment charge related to our Marine
Components unit. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The
goodwill impairment charge has no impact on our liquidity, cash flows from
operating activities, or debt covenant compliance, and does not have any impact
on future operations. In an effort to provide investors with
additional information regarding our results of operations as determined by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”), we have disclosed below our operating income, excluding the impact of
the goodwill impairment charge, which is a non-GAAP measure that is used by our
management to assess the performance of our operations. We believe
the disclosure of operating income, exclusive of the goodwill impairment charge,
provides useful information to investors because it allows investors to analyze
the performance of our operations in the same way that our management assesses
performance.
Operating
Income
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||
Including
the effect of the goodwill impairment charge
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
Excluding
the effect of the goodwill impairment charge
|
||||||||||
(GAAP)
|
charge
|
(Non-GAAP)
|
||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
$ | 6,186 | $ | 9,881 | $ | 16,067 | ||||||
Excluding the goodwill impairment charge, we reported operating income of $16.1
million in 2008 compared to $15.6 million in 2007, although 2007 operating
income was impacted by $2.7 million in facility consolidation
costs. The change in operating income compared to 2007, excluding the
goodwill impairment charge, was primarily the net result of lower order rates
from many of our customers due to unfavorable economic conditions in North
America and increased raw material costs, offset by the favorable effects of
facility consolidation costs incurred in 2007, the continuation of cost
reductions throughout 2008 and changes in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Our
operating income decreased from 2006 to 2007 primarily due to the unfavorable
effects of costs incurred in 2007 related to the consolidation of three of our
northern Illinois facilities into one facility, the unfavorable effect of
relative changes in foreign currency exchange rates, lower sales to the office
furniture industry due to competition from lower priced Asian manufacturers and
lower order rates from many of our customers due to unfavorable economic
conditions in North America.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates positively impacted sales by
$406,000, and positively impacted operating income by $1.3 million in 2008, as
compared to 2007. The positive impact on sales relates to sales
denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies translated into higher U.S. dollar
sales due to a strengthening of the local currency in relation to the U.S.
dollar. The positive impact on operating income is due to foreign
currency transaction gains in 2008 as compared to losses in
2007. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates positively
impacted sales in 2007 as compared to 2006 by $900,000, and negatively impacted
operating income by $2.4 million. The impact on net sales is
primarily due to the strengthening Canadian dollar in relation to the U.S.
dollar. The net impact on operating income primarily results from our
Canadian operations, due to the relative increase in costs as a result of the
stronger Canadian dollar.
- 15
-
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have
based the accompanying "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" upon our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We prepared our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). In
preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, and the reported amount of revenues and expenses
during the reported period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our
estimates, including those related to inventory reserves, the recoverability of
long-lived assets (including goodwill and other intangible assets) and the
realization of deferred income tax assets. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses. Our actual future results might differ from
previously-estimated amounts under different assumptions or
conditions.
We
believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant
judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial
Statements and are applicable to all of our operating segments:
·
|
Inventory reserves - We provide
reserves for estimated obsolete or unmarketable inventories equal to the
difference between the cost of inventories and the estimated net
realizable value using assumptions about future demand for our products
and market conditions. We also consider the age and the quantity of
inventory on hand in estimating the reserve. If actual market
conditions are less favorable than those we projected, we may be required
to recognize additional inventory
reserves.
|
·
|
Goodwill and other intangible
assets - In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and other Intangible
Assets, we review goodwill for impairment at least
annually. We are also required to review goodwill for
impairment at other times during each year when impairment indicators, as
defined, are present. The estimated fair values of our three reporting
units are determined based on discounted cash flow projections (Level 3
inputs). See Notes 1 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. Significant judgment is required in estimating cash
flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to
evaluate the impact of operating changes and to estimate future cash
flows. Assumptions used in our impairment evaluations, such as
forecasted growth rates and our cost of capital, are consistent with our
internal projections and operating plans.
During
the third quarter of 2008, we reviewed goodwill for impairment at each of
our reporting units. We concluded the fair value of our Marine
Reporting unit did not exceed the carrying value of its net assets as of
September 30, 2008. As a result, we recorded a goodwill
impairment charge of $9.9 million for our Marine Components reporting
unit, which represented all of the goodwill we had previously recognized
for this reporting unit. The factors that led us to conclude
goodwill associated with the Marine Components reporting unit was fully
impaired include the continued decline in consumer spending in the marine
market as well as the overall negative economic outlook, both of which
resulted in near-term and longer-term reduced revenue, profit and cash
flow forecasts for the Marine Components unit. While we
continue to believe in the long term potential of the Marine Components
unit, due to the extraordinary economic downturn in the marine industry we
are not currently able to foresee when the industry and our business will
recover. In response to the present economic conditions, we
have taken steps to reduce operating costs without inhibiting our ability
to take advantage of opportunities to expand our market
share.
When
we performed this analysis in the third quarter of 2008, we also reviewed
the goodwill associated with our Security Products and Furniture
Components reporting units as well as the other intangible assets
associated with our Marine Components unit (including customer lists,
trademarks and patents), and concluded there was no impairment of either
the goodwill for those reporting units or the other intangible assets of
our Marine Components unit. The estimated fair values were also
determined based on discounted cash flow
projections. Assumptions used in these impairment evaluations,
such as forecasted growth rates and our cost of capital, are consistent
with our internal projections and operating plans. However, different
assumptions and estimates could result in materially different findings
which could result in the recognition of a material asset
impairment. Due to the continued weakening of the economy, we
re-evaluated the goodwill associated with our Furniture Components
reporting unit again in the fourth quarter of 2008 and concluded no
additional impairments were present.
If
our future results were to be significantly below our current
expectations, it is reasonably likely that we would conclude additional
impairments of the goodwill and intangible assets associated with our
Furniture Components reporting unit would be present. As of
December 31, 2008 our Furniture Components reporting unit had
approximately $7.1 million of goodwill. Holding all other
assumptions constant at the re-evaluation date, a 100 to 200 basis point
increase in the discount rate would reduce the enterprise value for our
Furniture Components reporting unit, indicating potential
impairment. If we record additional impairment charges in the
future, it could cause us to fail to comply with one or more of the
financial covenants contained in our credit facility. See Note
6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In the event we
were to fail to comply with one or more covenants, we would attempt to
negotiate waivers of any noncompliance; however, there can be no assurance
that we would be able to negotiate any waivers. In addition, the
costs or conditions associated with any waivers could be
significant. At December 31, 2008 we had no balances
outstanding under the facility and we do not anticipate needing to utilize
the facility for operations in
2009.
|
- 16
-
·
|
Long-lived assets - We
assess our property and equipment costs for impairment only when
circumstances indicate an impairment may exist, in accordance with SFAS
No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Our
determination is based upon, among other things, our estimates of the
amount of future net cash flows to be generated by the long-lived asset
(Level 3 inputs) and our estimates of the current fair value of the
asset. Significant judgment is required in estimating cash
flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to
evaluate the impact of operating changes and to estimate future cash
flows. Assumptions used in our impairment evaluations, such as
forecasted growth rates and our cost of capital, are consistent with our
internal projections and operating plans. No impairment was
identified in 2008.
|
·
|
Income taxes – We
recognize deferred taxes for future tax effects of temporary differences
between financial and income tax reporting in accordance with the
recognition criteria of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. We record a reserve for uncertain tax positions in
accordance with FIN
No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertain
Tax Positions for tax positions where we believe it is
more-likely-than-not our position will not prevail with the applicable tax
authorities. While we have considered future taxable income and
ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need
for a valuation allowance, it is possible that in the future we may change
our estimate of the amount of the deferred income tax assets that would
more-likely-than-not be realized in the future resulting in an adjustment
to the deferred income tax asset valuation allowance that would either
increase or decrease, as applicable, reported net income in the period the
change in estimate was made.
In
addition, we make an evaluation at the end of each reporting period as to
whether or not some or all of the undistributed earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries are permanently reinvested (as that term is defined in
GAAP). While we may have concluded in the past that some of the
undistributed earnings are permanently reinvested, facts and circumstances
can change in the future, and it is possible that a change in facts and
circumstances, such as a change in the expectation regarding the capital
needs of our foreign subsidiaries, could result in a conclusion that some
or all of the undistributed earnings are no longer permanently
reinvested. In such an event, we would be required to recognize
a deferred income tax liability in an amount equal to the estimated
incremental U.S. income tax and withholding tax liability that would be
generated if all of the previously-considered permanently reinvested
undistributed earnings were distributed to us in the
U.S.
|
- 17
-
·
|
Accruals - We record
accruals for environmental, legal and other contingencies and commitments
when estimated future expenditures associated with the contingencies
become probable, and we can reasonably estimate the amounts of the future
expenditures. However, new information may become available to
us, or circumstances (such as applicable laws and regulations) may change,
thereby resulting in an increase or decrease in the amount we are required
to accrue for such matters (and, therefore, a corresponding decrease or
increase of our reported net income in the period of such
change.)
|
Results
of Operations - 2008 Compared to 2007 and 2007 Compared to 2006
Years ended December 31,
|
%Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2006-07 | 2007-08 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 190.1 | $ | 177.7 | $ | 165.5 | (7 | %) | (7 | %) | ||||||||||
Cost
of good sold
|
143.6 | 132.5 | 125.2 | (8 | %) | (6 | %) | |||||||||||||
Gross
margin
|
46.5 | 45.2 | 40.3 | (3 | %) | (11 | %) | |||||||||||||
Operating
costs and expenses
|
26.2 | 29.6 | 24.2 | 13 | % | (18 | )% | |||||||||||||
Goodwill
impairment
|
- | - | 9.9 | - |
n.m.
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
$ | 20.3 | $ | 15.6 | $ | 6.2 | (23 | %) | (60 | %) | ||||||||||
Percent
of net sales:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
76 | % | 75 | % | 76 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gross
margin
|
24 | % | 25 | % | 24 | % | ||||||||||||||
Operating
costs and expenses
|
14 | % | 17 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill
impairment
|
- | - | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
11 | % | 9 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||
n.m.
not meaningful
|
Net Sales. Net
sales decreased in 2008 as compared to 2007 principally due to lower order rates
from many of our customers resulting from unfavorable economic conditions in
North America, offset in part by the effect of sales price increases for certain
products to mitigate the effect of higher raw material costs.
Net sales
decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 principally due to lower sales of certain
products to the office furniture market where Asian competitors have established
selling prices at a level below which we consider would return a minimally
sufficient margin to us as well as lower order rates from many of our customers
due to unfavorable economic conditions, offset in part by the effect of sales
price increases for certain products to mitigate the effect of higher raw
material costs.
Costs of Goods Sold and Gross
Margin. Cost of goods sold decreased from 2007 to 2008
primarily due to decreased sales volumes. As a percentage of sales,
gross margin decreased in 2008 from the prior year. The decrease in
gross margin is primarily due to higher raw material costs, not all of which
could be recovered through sales price increases or surcharges, combined with
reduced coverage of fixed manufacturing costs from lower sales volume partially
offset by lower depreciation expense in 2008 due to a reduction in capital
expenditure requirements for shorter lived assets over the last several years in
response to lower sales.
- 18
-
Cost of
goods sold decreased from 2006 to 2007, and gross margin percentage increased
from the prior year. During 2007, we experienced the favorable
effects of an improved product mix due to the sales decline primarily occurring
in our lower margin Furniture Components segment and improved operating
efficiency within our recently acquired Marine operations partially offset by
the unfavorable effect of relative changes in foreign currency exchange rates,
lower sales to the office furniture industry due to competition from lower
priced Asian manufacturers and lower order rates from many of our customers due
to unfavorable economic conditions.
Operating Costs and
Expenses. Operating costs and expenses consists primarily of
salaries, commissions and advertising expenses directly related to product
sales, as well as, gains and losses on plant, property and equipment and
currency gains and losses. As a percentage of net sales, operating
costs and expenses decreased from 2007 to 2008 primarily as a result of $2.7
million of costs recorded in 2007 related to the consolidation of three of our
northern Illinois facilities into one facility (see Note 9 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements) and a $1.8 million favorable change in currency gains and
losses.
As a
percentage of net sales, operating costs and expenses increased from 2006 to
2007 primarily as a result of lower sales volumes in 2007, the increase in
foreign exchange transaction losses due to the strengthening of the Canadian
dollar in relation to the U.S. dollar (a loss increase over 2006 of $1.2
million) as well as $2.7 million of costs related to the consolidation of three
of our northern Illinois facilities into one facility in 2007.
Goodwill
impairment. In 2008, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge
of $9.9 million for our Marine Components reporting unit. See Note 4
to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Operating
Income. Excluding the goodwill impairment charge discussed
above, the comparison of operating income for 2008 to 2007 was primarily
impacted by:
·
|
a
negative impact of approximately $5.4 million relating to lower order
rates from many of our customers resulting from unfavorable economic
conditions in North America, and
|
·
|
increased
raw material costs that we were not able to fully recover through sales
price increases by approximately $1.0 million due to the competitive
nature of the markets we serve.
|
The above
decreases were primarily offset by:
·
|
the
one-time $2.7 million of facility consolidation costs incurred in
2007,
|
·
|
$1.8
million in lower depreciation expense in 2008 due to a reduction in
capital expenditures for shorter lived assets over the last several years
in response to lower sales, and
|
·
|
the
$1.3 million favorable effect on operating income of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates.
|
Operating
income for 2007 decreased $4.7 million, or 23% compared to 2006 and operating
margins decreased to 9% in 2007 compared to 11% for 2006. We
experienced the favorable effects of an improved product mix due
to:
·
|
a
higher portion of the sales decline in 2007 occurring among lower margin
products,
|
·
|
an
increased percentage of sales from our higher margin Marine business,
and
|
·
|
improved
operating efficiency within our recently acquired Marine
operations.
|
However,
these improvements were more than offset by the unfavorable effects
of:
·
|
the
$2.7 million one-time facility consolidation costs noted
above,
|
·
|
a
$2.4 million unfavorable effect of relative changes in foreign currency
exchange rates (including the $1.2 million related to foreign exchange
transaction losses noted above),
|
·
|
lower
sales to the office furniture industry due to competition from lower
priced Asian manufacturers, and
|
·
|
lower
order rates from many of our customers due to unfavorable economic
conditions.
|
- 19
-
Currency. Our
Furniture Components segment has substantial operations and assets located
outside the United States (in Canada and Taiwan). The majority of
sales generated from our non-U.S. operations are denominated in the U.S. dollar
with the remainder denominated in other currencies, principally the Canadian
dollar and the New Taiwan dollar. Most raw materials, labor and other
production costs for our non-U.S. operations are denominated primarily in local
currencies. Consequently, the translated U.S. dollar values of our
non-U.S. sales and operating results are subject to currency exchange rate
fluctuations which may favorably or unfavorably impact reported earnings and may
affect comparability of period-to-period operating results.
Overall,
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates had the following effects on our
Furniture Component segment’s net sales and operating income:
Increase
(decrease) –
Year ended December
31,
|
||||||||
2006 vs 2007
|
2007 vs 2008
|
|||||||
Impact
on:
|
(In
thousands)
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 886 | $ | 406 | ||||
Operating
income
|
(2,384 | ) | 1,304 |
The
positive impact on sales relates to sales denominated in non-U.S. dollar
currencies translating into higher U.S. dollar sales due to a strengthening of
the local currency in relation to the U.S. dollar. The negative
impact on operating income for the 2006 versus 2007 comparison results from the
U.S. dollar denominated sales of non-U.S. operations converted into lower local
currency amounts due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar. This
negatively impacts margin as it results in less local currency generated from
sales to cover the costs of non-U.S. operations which are denominated in the
local currency. The positive impact on operating income for the 2007
versus 2008 comparison is due to currency exchange gains in 2008 as compared to
losses in 2007.
General
Our
profitability primarily depends on our ability to utilize our production
capacity effectively, which is affected by, among other things, the demand for
our products and our ability to control our manufacturing costs, primarily
comprised of labor costs and raw materials such as zinc, copper, coiled steel,
stainless steel and plastic resins. Raw material costs represent approximately
51% of our total cost of sales. During 2006, 2007 and most of 2008,
worldwide raw material costs increased significantly. We occasionally
enter into raw material supply arrangements to mitigate the short-term impact of
future increases in raw material costs. While these arrangements do
not necessarily commit us to a minimum volume of purchases, they generally
provide for stated unit prices based upon achievement of specified volume
purchase levels. This allows us to stabilize raw material purchase prices to a
certain extent, provided the specified minimum monthly purchase quantities are
met. We enter into such arrangements for zinc, coiled steel and plastic
resins. While raw material purchase prices have recently declined, it
is uncertain whether the current prices will stabilize during
2009. Materials purchased on the spot market are sometimes subject to
unanticipated and sudden price increases. Due to the competitive
nature of the markets served by our products, it is often difficult to recover
increases in raw material costs through increased product selling prices or raw
material surcharges. Consequently, overall operating margins may be
affected by raw material cost pressures.
Other
non-operating income, net
As
summarized in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “other
non-operating income, net” primarily includes interest
income. Interest income decreased in 2008 compared to 2007 by
approximately $900,000 due to lower interest rates on lower invested cash
balances. Other non-operating income was comparable from 2007 to
2006.
- 20
-
Interest expense
Interest
expense increased approximately $1.6 million in 2008 compared to 2007 and
increased $550,000 in 2007 compared to 2006, as a result of financing the
October 2007 repurchase and/or cancellation of a net 2.7 million shares of our
Class A common stock from an affiliate with a promissory note. We expect 2009
interest expense to be lower than 2008 due to lower average debt outstanding and
lower interest rates. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Provision
for income taxes
As a
member of the Contran Tax Group, we compute our provision for income taxes on a
separate company basis, using the tax elections made by Contran. One
such election is whether to claim a deduction or a tax credit against U.S.
taxable income with respect to foreign income taxes paid. Consistent with
elections of the Contran Tax Group, in 2006, 2007 and 2008 we did not claim a
credit with respect to foreign income taxes paid but instead we claimed a tax
deduction for related withholding taxes. This resulted in an increase
in our effective income tax rate.
Excluding
the goodwill impairment charge, our effective income tax rate increased from 44%
in 2007 to 51% in 2008 primarily due to a higher percentage of our earnings
being sourced from Canada and as noted above, the taxes on these earnings are
not claimed as a credit on our U.S. tax return. Our effective income
tax rate was comparable at 45% and 44% in 2006 and 2007,
respectively. We currently expect our effective income tax rate for
2009 will approximate our effective income tax rate for 2008, excluding
the goodwill impairment charge.
Segment
Results
The key
performance indicator for our segments is the level of their operating income
(see discussion below). For additional information regarding our
segments refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Years ended December 31,
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2006 – 2007 | 2007 – 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
(In
millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Security
Products
|
$ | 81.7 | $ | 80.1 | $ | 77.1 | (2 | %) | (4 | %) | ||||||||||
Furniture
Components
|
93.0 | 81.3 | 76.4 | (13 | %) | (6 | %) | |||||||||||||
Marine
Components
|
15.4 | 16.3 | 12.0 | 6 | % | (26 | %) | |||||||||||||
Total
net sales
|
$ | 190.1 | $ | 177.7 | $ | 165.5 | (7 | %) | (7 | %) | ||||||||||
Gross
margin:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Security
Products
|
$ | 23.9 | $ | 24.1 | $ | 21.7 | 1 | % | (10 | %) | ||||||||||
Furniture
Components
|
18.9 | 16.7 | 16.1 | (12 | %) | (4 | %) | |||||||||||||
Marine
Components
|
3.7 | 4.4 | 2.5 | 19 | % | (43 | %) | |||||||||||||
Total
gross margin
|
$ | 46.5 | $ | 45.2 | $ | 40.3 | (3 | %) | (11 | %) | ||||||||||
Operating
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Security
Products
|
$ | 14.6 | $ | 12.2 | $ | 12.7 | (16 | %) | 4 | % | ||||||||||
Furniture
Components
|
10.1 | 8.0 | 9.2 | (21 | %) | 15 | % | |||||||||||||
Marine
Components
|
0.8 | 0.8 | (10.4 | ) | - |
n.m.
|
||||||||||||||
Corporate
operating expenses
|
(5.2 | ) | (5.4 | ) | (5.3 | ) | 4 | % | (2 | %) | ||||||||||
Total
operating income
|
$ | 20.3 | $ | 15.6 | $ | 6.2 | (23 | %) | (60 | %) | ||||||||||
Operating
income margin:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Security
Products
|
18 | % | 15 | % | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||
Furniture
Components
|
11 | % | 10 | % | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||
Marine
Components
|
5 | % | 5 | % | (87 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Total
operating income margin
|
11 | % | 9 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||
n.m.
not meaningful
|
- 21
-
Security
Products. Security Products net sales decreased 4% to $77.1
million in 2008 compared to $80.1 million in 2007. The decrease in
sales is primarily due to lower order rates from many of our customers resulting
from unfavorable economic conditions in North America, offset in part by the
effect of sales price increases for certain products to mitigate the effect of
higher raw material costs. As a percentage of sales, gross margin
decreased in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily due to increased raw material costs
that were not fully recovered through price increases. Operating
income percentage increased slightly in 2008 primarily as a result of $2.7
million of costs incurred in 2007 related to the consolidation of two of our
northern Illinois Security Products facilities shared with a Marine Components
operation.
Security
Products net sales decreased 2% to $80.1 million in 2007 compared to $81.7
million in 2006. Gross margin percentage was comparable year over
year. Operating income margin percentage decreased in 2007 compared
to 2006, which resulted in a 16% decrease in operating income. The
operating income margin percentage decrease was primarily due to the 2007
facility consolidation discussed above and the lower sales volumes resulting
from lower order rates from many of our customers due to unfavorable economic
conditions offset by lower raw material costs in 2007.
Furniture
Components. Furniture Components net sales decreased 6% to
$76.4 million in 2008 from $81.3 million in 2007, primarily due
to lower order rates from many of our customers resulting from unfavorable
economic conditions in North America, offset in part by the effect of sales
price increases for certain products to mitigate the effect of higher raw
material costs. Gross margin percentage was comparable year over
year. Operating income percentage increased in 2008 compared to 2007
primarily due to a $1.3 million favorable change in the effect of currency
exchange rates.
Furniture
Components net sales decreased 13% to $81.3 million in 2007 from $93.0
million in 2006,
primarily due to lower sales volumes to the office furniture industry where, for
certain products Asian competitors have established selling prices at a level
below which we consider would return a minimally sufficient margin to us and the
effect of lower order rates from many of our customers due to unfavorable
economic conditions. Gross margin percentage increased slightly in
2007 compared to 2006 due to $1.3 million in lower depreciation expense
resulting from a reduction in capital expenditures over the last several years
in response to lower sales and improvements in operational efficiencies through
lean manufacturing and other process improvements.
Marine
Components. Marine Components net sales decreased 26% in 2008
as compared to 2007 primarily due to a dramatic overall downturn in the marine
industry. Gross margin percentage decreased from 27% in 2007 to 21%
in 2008. Operating income for the Marine Components segment includes
a goodwill impairment charge of approximately $9.9 million as a result of our
third quarter goodwill evaluation analysis. Excluding the goodwill
impairment charge, operating income decreased from approximately $800,000 of
income in 2007 to an operating loss of approximately $500,000 in
2008. The decreases in gross margin and operating income are the
result of reduced coverage of fixed costs from lower sales volume.
Marine
Components net sales increased in 2007 from 2006 due to the impact of a Marine
acquisition in April 2006. Operating income was comparable from 2006
to 2007 as improvements in gross margin relating to improved production
efficiency were offset by increased selling and administrative costs relating to
creating more robust support functions for those recently acquired
businesses.
Outlook
Demand
for our products continues to slow, especially during the fourth quarter of
2008, as customers react to the condition of the overall
economy. While all segments of our business are being affected, we
are experiencing a greater softness in demand in the industries we serve which
are more directly connected to lower consumer spending, as further explained
below.
·
|
Our
Security Products segment is the least affected by the softness in
consumer demand, because we sell products to a diverse number of business
customers across a wide range of markets, most of which are not directly
impacted by changes in consumer demand. While demand within
this segment is not as significantly affected by softness in the overall
economy, we expect sales to be lower over the next twelve
months.
|
- 22
-
·
|
Our
Furniture Components segment sales are primarily concentrated in the
office furniture, toolbox, home appliance and a number of other
industries. Several of these industries, primarily toolbox and
home appliance, are more directly affected by consumer demand than those
served by our Security Products segment. We expect many of the
markets served by Furniture Components to continue to experience low
demand over the next twelve months.
|
·
|
Our
Marine segment has been the most affected by the slowing economy as the
decrease in consumer confidence, the decline in home values, a tighter
credit market and volatile fuel costs have resulted in a significant
reduction in consumer spending in the marine market. We do not
expect the marine market to recover until consumer confidence returns and
home values stabilize.
|
While
changes in market demand are not within our control, we are focused on the areas
we can impact. We expect our lean manufacturing and cost improvement
initiatives to continue to positively impact our productivity and result in a
more efficient infrastructure that we can leverage when demand growth
returns. Additionally, we continue to seek opportunities to gain
market share in markets we currently serve, expand into new markets and develop
new product features in order to mitigate the impact of reduced demand as
well as broaden our sales base.
In
addition to challenges with overall demand, volatility in the cost of raw
materials is ongoing. While the cost of commodity raw materials
declined in the second half of 2008, we currently expect these costs to continue
to be volatile in 2009. If raw material prices increase, we may not
be able to fully recover the cost by passing them on to our customers through
price increases due to the competitive nature of the markets we serve and the
depressed economic conditions.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Summary.
Our
primary source of liquidity on an on-going basis is our cash flow from operating
activities, which is generally used to (i) fund capital expenditures, (ii) repay
short-term or long-term indebtedness incurred primarily for working capital,
capital expenditures or reducing our outstanding stock and (iii) provide for the
payment of dividends (if declared). From time-to-time, we will incur
indebtedness, primarily for short-term working capital needs, or to fund capital
expenditures or business combinations. In addition, from
time-to-time, we may also sell assets outside the ordinary course of business,
the proceeds of which are generally used to repay indebtedness (including
indebtedness which may have been collateralized by the assets sold) or to fund
capital expenditures or business combinations.
Consolidated
cash flows.
Operating
activities. Trends in cash flows from operating activities,
excluding changes in assets and liabilities, for 2006, 2007 and 2008 have
generally been similar to the trends in our earnings. Depreciation and
amortization expense decreased in 2008 compared to 2007, and in 2007 compared to
2006 due to the timing of capital expenditures placed into service each
year. See Notes 1 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Changes
in assets and liabilities result primarily from the timing of production, sales
and purchases. Such changes in assets and liabilities generally tend
to even out over time. However, year-to-year relative changes in
assets and liabilities can significantly affect the comparability of cash flows
from operating activities. Cash provided by operating activities was
$15.7 million in 2008, an increase of $3.8 million over 2007 cash provided by
operating activities. The increase in cash provided by operating
activities in 2008 compared to 2007 is primarily the net result of:
- 23
-
·
|
Higher
operating income in 2008 of approximately $500,000 (exclusive of the $9.9
million goodwill impairment
charge);
|
·
|
Lower
depreciation and amortization in 2008 of $1.8
million;
|
·
|
Lower
net cash provided by relative changes in our inventories, receivables,
payables and non-tax related accruals of $1.8 million in
2008;
|
·
|
Lower
cash paid for income taxes in 2008 of $6.3 million due to lower
repatriations of non-US earnings in
2008;
|
·
|
Higher
cash paid for interest in 2008 of $2.2 million due to the October
2007 issuance of our promissory note to an affiliate;
and
|
·
|
Lower
interest income of approximately $900,000 in 2008 due to lower average
cash balances during 2008 resulting from the use of excess cash to prepay
principle on our promissory note.
|
Cash
provided by operating activities was $11.9 million in 2007, a decrease of $15.5
million over 2006 cash provided by operating activities. The decrease
in our cash provided by operating activities in 2007 as compared to 2006 is
primarily the result of:
· |
higher
cash paid for income taxes in 2007 of $6.9 million primarily relating to
U.S. taxes on dividends repatriated from our non-U.S.
subsidiaries,
|
·
|
lower
operating income of $4.7 million,
and
|
·
|
a
$2.6 million decrease in 2007 in cash provided by relative changes in
assets and liabilities (excluding taxes) primarily due to higher raw
materials costs resulting in an increase in our inventory
balance.
|
Our
average days’-sales-outstanding (“DSO”) at December 31, 2008 was 41 days
compared to 44 days at December 31, 2007. The decrease is primarily
due to the timing of collections on a lower accounts receivable balance as of
December 31, 2008. For comparative purposes, our average DSO was 44
days for December 31, 2007 and 41 days at December 31, 2006. Our
average number of days-in-inventory (“DII”) was 70 days at December 31, 2008 and
63 days at December 31, 2007. The increase in DII is primarily due to
lower sales in the fourth quarter of 2008 which impacted the DII calculation
although in absolute terms, we reduced inventory by $1.6 million from 2007 to
2008. For comparative purposes our average DII was 63 days at
December 31, 2007 and 57 days at December 31, 2006. The increase is
primarily due to the higher cost of commodity raw materials during 2007 and
higher inventory balances associated with the facility consolidation in
2007.
Investing activities. Net
cash used by investing activities totaled $19.3 million, $12.4 million, and $5.2
million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively. Capital expenditures in the past three years have
primarily emphasized improving our manufacturing facilities and investing in
manufacturing equipment which utilizes new technologies and increases automation
of the manufacturing process to provide for increased productivity and
efficiency.
During
2007, we constructed a new facility and consolidated three of our northern
Illinois facilities into one facility at a cost of approximately $9.6
million. As a part of the facility consolidation project, the Lake
Bluff, Illinois facility was sold in 2006 for approximately $1.3 million which
approximated book value and was leased-back until we vacated the facility in
October 2007. The River Grove, Illinois facility is no longer being
utilized and is being actively marketed for sale. See Note 9 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
During
2006, we built a new facility for one of our Marine Components subsidiaries at a
cost of $4.1 million. The facility is expected to provide the
subsidiary with sufficient capacity to take advantage of sales growth
opportunities in the future.
In April
2006, we completed the acquisition of a marine component products business for
$9.8 million, net of cash acquired. See Note 2 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In April
of 2006, 2007, and 2008 we collected payments of $1.3 million, respectively,
related to the sale of our European Thomas Regout operations, completed in 2005,
which required annual payments over a period of four years.
- 24
-
Capital
expenditure projects in 2008 emphasized improved production efficiency including
$2.6 million spent to replace our waste water treatment equipment at our South
Carolina facility. Capital expenditures for 2009 are estimated at
approximately $4.0 million compared to capital expenditures of $6.8 million in
2008 and $13.8 million in 2007. We have lowered our planned capital
expenditures in 2009 in response to the current economic conditions and are
limiting investments to those expenditures required to meet the lower expected
customer demand and those required to properly maintain our
facilities. Capital spending for 2009 is expected to be funded
through cash on hand and cash generated from operations.
Financing activities. Net
cash used by financing activities totaled $8.8 million, $11.7 million, and $14.2
million in 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Cash dividends paid
totaled $7.6 million, $7.3 million, and $6.2 million ($.50 per share) in 2006,
2007, and 2008, respectively. Dividends paid decreased in 2008 as a
result of the repurchase and/or cancellation of a net 2.7 million shares of our
Class A common stock held by TIMET, an affiliate in the fourth quarter of
2007. We purchased these shares for $19.50 per share, or aggregate
consideration of $52.6 million, which we paid in the form of a consolidated
promissory note. We prepaid approximately $2.6 million and $7.0
million toward the promissory note in 2007 and 2008,
respectively. See Notes 8 and 11 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In 2008,
we repurchased approximately 126,000 shares of our Class A common stock in
market transactions for an aggregate of $1.0 million. In 2007, we
also repurchased approximately 179,100 shares of our Class A common stock in
market transactions for an aggregate of $3.3 million. See Note 8 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2006
we prepaid $1.6 million of indebtedness we assumed in our 2005 marine components
acquisition.
In
January 2009, we amended our secured revolving bank credit facility which
extended the facility until January 15, 2012. Additionally, we
reduced the size of the credit facility from $50 million to $37.5 million, which
more appropriately reflects our potential borrowing needs. The credit
facility is collateralized by 65% of the ownership interests in our first-tier
non-United States subsidiaries. Provisions contained in our Revolving
Bank Credit Agreement could result in the acceleration of outstanding
indebtedness prior to its stated maturity for reasons other than defaults from
failing to comply with typical financial covenants. For example, our
Credit Agreement allows the lender to accelerate the maturity of the
indebtedness upon a change of control (as defined) of the
borrower. The terms of the Credit Agreement could result in the
acceleration of all or a portion of the indebtedness following a sale of assets
outside of the ordinary course of business. At December 31, 2008 we
had no balances outstanding under the facility. See Note 6 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Off balance sheet financing
arrangements. Other than certain operating leases discussed in
Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, neither we nor any of our
subsidiaries or affiliates are parties to any off-balance sheet financing
arrangements.
Other
We
believe that cash generated from operations and borrowing availability under our
credit agreement, together with cash on hand, will be sufficient to meet our
liquidity needs for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service and
dividends (if declared). To the extent that our actual operating
results or other developments differ from our expectations, our liquidity could
be adversely affected.
We
periodically evaluate our liquidity requirements, alternative uses of capital,
capital needs and available resources in view of, among other things, our
capital expenditure requirements, dividend policy and estimated future operating
cash flows. As a result of this process, we have in the past and may
in the future seek to raise additional capital, refinance or restructure
indebtedness, issue additional securities, repurchase shares of our common
stock, modify our dividend policy or take a combination of such steps to manage
our liquidity and capital resources. In the normal course of
business, we may review opportunities for acquisitions, joint ventures or other
business combinations in the component products industry. In the
event of any such transaction, we may consider using available cash, issuing
additional equity securities or increasing our indebtedness or that of our
subsidiaries; however, there are no assurances that we could obtain additional
financing on favorable terms.
- 25
-
Contractual
obligations. As more fully described in the notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, we are a party to various debt, lease and
other agreements which contractually and unconditionally commit the Company to
pay certain amounts in the future. See Notes 6 and 12 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. The following table summarizes
such contractual commitments as of December 31, 2008 by the type and date of
payment.
Payments due by period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
2009
|
2010–2011
|
2012-2013
|
2014
and after
|
||||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Note
and interest payable to affiliate
|
$ | 54,572 | $ | 3,128 | $ | 6,146 | $ | 5,905 | $ | 39,393 | ||||||||||
Operating
leases
|
717 | 400 | 301 | 16 | - | |||||||||||||||
Purchase
obligations
|
16,469 | 16,469 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
1,167 | 1,167 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Fixed
asset acquisitions
|
649 | 649 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Total
contractual cash obligations
|
$ | 73,574 | $ | 21,813 | $ | 6,447 | $ | 5,921 | $ | 39,393 |
The
timing and amount shown for our commitments related to long-term debt, operating
leases and fixed asset acquisitions are based upon the contractual payment
amount and the contractual payment date for those commitments. The
timing and amount shown for purchase obligations, which consist of all open
purchase orders and contractual obligations (primarily commitments to purchase
raw materials) is also based on the contractual payment amount and the
contractual payment date for those commitments. The amount shown for
income taxes is the consolidated amount of income taxes payable at December 31,
2008, which is assumed to be paid during 2009. Fixed asset
acquisitions include firm purchase commitments for capital
projects.
Commitments and
contingencies. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Recent accounting
pronouncements. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
General. We are
exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates
and raw materials prices.
Interest rates. We
are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, primarily related to
indebtedness.
At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had no amounts outstanding under our secured
Revolving Bank Credit Agreement. In conjunction with the repurchase
and/or cancellation of a net 2.7 million shares of our class A common stock,
during the fourth quarter of 2007, we issued a promissory note for $52.6
million. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. At December 31, 2008, there was $43.0 million outstanding
on the promissory note ($50.0 million at December 31, 2007) which bears interest
at LIBOR plus 1%, (5.05% and 5.98% and December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively)
and the fair value of such indebtedness approximates its carrying
value. The interest rate is reset quarterly based on the three month
LIBOR.
Currency exchange
rates. We are exposed to market risk arising from changes in
currency exchange rates as a result of manufacturing and selling our products
outside the United States (principally Canada and Taiwan). A portion
of our sales generated from our non-U.S. operations are denominated in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar, principally the Canadian dollar and the
New Taiwan dollar. In addition, a portion of our sales generated from
our non-U.S. operations are denominated in the U.S. dollar. Most raw
materials, labor and other production costs for these non-U.S. operations are
denominated primarily in local currencies. As a result, the
translated U.S. dollar value of our non-U.S. sales and operating results are
subject to currency exchange rate fluctuations which may favorably or
unfavorably impact reported earnings and may affect comparability of
period-to-period operating results.
- 26
-
As
already mentioned certain of our sales generated by our Canadian operations are
denominated in U.S. dollars. Consequently, we periodically enter into
forward currency contracts to mitigate the financial statement impact of changes
in currency exchange rates. At each balance sheet date, outstanding
forward currency contracts are marked-to-market with any resulting gain or loss
recognized in income currently unless the contract is designated as a hedge upon
which the mark-to-market adjustment is recorded in other comprehensive
income. To manage a portion of the currency exchange rate market risk
associated with receivables, or similar exchange rate risk associated with
future sales, at December 31, 2008 we had entered into a series of short-term
forward currency exchange contracts to exchange an aggregate of $7.5 million for
an equivalent value of Canadian dollars at exchange rates of Cdn. $1.25 to $1.26
per U.S. dollar. These contracts qualified for hedge accounting and
mature through June 2009. At December 31, 2008, the actual exchange
rate was Cdn. $1.22 per U.S. dollar. The estimated fair value of such
contracts was not material at December 31, 2008. We had no forward
currency contracts outstanding at December 31, 2007.
Raw materials. We will occasionally
enter into raw material arrangements to mitigate the short-term impact of future
increases in raw material costs. Otherwise, we generally do not have
long-term supply agreements for our raw material requirements because either we
believe the risk of unavailability of those raw materials is low and we believe
the price to be stable or because long-term supply agreements for those
materials are generally not available. We do not engage in commodity
hedging programs.
Other. The above
discussion includes forward-looking statements of market risk which assumes
hypothetical changes in market prices. Actual future market
conditions will likely differ materially from such
assumptions. Accordingly, such forward-looking statements should not
be considered to be our projections of future events, gains or
losses. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks
and uncertainties some of which are listed in “Business-General.”
ITEM
8.
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The
information called for by this Item is contained in a separate section of this
Annual Report. See "Index of Financial Statements" (page
F-1).
ITEM
9.
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM
9A. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. We maintain a system of disclosure controls and
procedures. The term "disclosure controls and procedures," as defined
by regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), means
controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit to the SEC under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit to the SEC
under the Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including its
principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, or persons
performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions to be
made regarding required disclosure. Each of David A. Bowers, the
Company's Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and
Darryl R. Halbert, the Company's Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Controller, have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of December
31, 2008. Based upon their evaluation, these executive officers have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the
date of such evaluation.
- 27
-
Scope of Management Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. We also maintain a
system of internal control over financial reporting. The term
“internal control over financial reporting,” as defined by regulations of the
SEC, means a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal
executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other
personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“GAAP”), and includes those policies and procedures
that:
·
|
Pertain
to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our
assets.
|
·
|
Provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that
receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of our management and directors,
and
|
·
|
Provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have
a material effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
|
Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, requires us to include a management
report on internal control over financial reporting in the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Our independent registered
public accounting firm will also be required to annually attest to the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, but under the
rules of the SEC this attestation is not required until our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Management’s Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our
evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
is based upon the framework established in Internal Control - Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (commonly referred to as the “COSO” framework). Based on our
evaluation under that framework, our management has concluded that our internal
control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2008. This annual report does not include an attestation report of
our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our
registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in
this annual report. See “Scope of Management’s Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting” above.
Changes in Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. There has been no change to our system of
internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31,
2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our system of internal control over financial reporting.
Certifications. Our
chief executive officer is required to annually file a certification with the
New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), certifying our compliance with the corporate
governance listing standards of the NYSE. During 2008, our chief
executive officer filed such annual certification with the NYSE, indicating we
were in compliance with such listed standards. Our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer are also required to, among other things,
quarterly file a certification with the SEC regarding the quality of our public
disclosures, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. We have filed the certifications for the quarter ended December
31, 2008 as exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
ITEM
9B. OTHER
INFORMATION
Not
applicable.
- 28
-
PART
III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The
information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive
Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant
to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by
this report ("Proxy Statement").
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The
information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy
Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The
information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy
Statement.
ITEM
13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The
information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy
Statement. See also Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The
information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy
Statement.
PART
IV
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS,
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) and
(c) Financial
Statements
The
consolidated financial statements listed on the accompanying Index of Financial
Statements (see page F-1) are filed as part of this Annual Report.
All
financial statement schedules have been omitted either because they are not
applicable or required, or the information that would be required to be included
is disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
(b) Exhibits
We have
retained a signed original of any of these exhibits that contain signatures, and
we will provide such exhibits to the Commission or its
staff. Included as exhibits are the items listed in the Exhibit
Index. We, upon request, will furnish a copy of any of the exhibits
listed below upon payment of $4.00 per exhibit to cover our costs of furnishing
the exhibits. Instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term
debt issues which do not exceed 10% of consolidated total assets will be
furnished to the Commission upon request. We, upon request, will also
furnish, without charge, a copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as
adopted by the board of directors on February 24, 2004, upon
request. Such requests should be directed to the attention of our
Corporate Secretary at our corporate offices located at 5430 LBJ Freeway, Suite
1700, Dallas, Texas 75240.
Item
No. Exhibit
Item
3.1
|
Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant - incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-42643).
|
- 29
-
Item
No. Exhibit Item
(continued)
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Registrant, adopted by the Board of Directors
October 24, 2007 – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 30, 2007 (File No
1-13905).
|
10.1
|
Share
Purchase Agreement with Subordinated Loan schedule between the Registrant
and Anchor Holding B.V. dated January 24, 2005 - incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004. All related schedules and annexes
will be provided to the SEC upon request.
|
10.2
|
Intercorporate
Services Agreement between the Registrant and Contran Corporation
effective as of January 1, 2004 – incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003.
|
10.3*
|
CompX
International Inc. 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan – incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-42643).
|
10.4
|
Tax
Sharing Agreement between the Registrant, NL Industries, Inc. and Contran
Corporation dated as of October 5, 2004 - incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004.
|
10.5
|
Stock
Purchase Agreement dated October 16, 2007 between the Registrant and TIMET
Finance Management Company – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2007 (File
No. 1-13905).
|
10.6
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated as of October 16, 2007 among Registrant, CompX
Group, Inc. and CompX KDL LLC - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2007
(File No. 1-13905).
|
10.7
|
Form
of Subordination Agreement among the Registrant, TIMET Finance Management
Company, CompX Security Products Inc., CompX Precision Slides Inc., CompX
Marine Inc., Custom Marine Inc., Livorsi Marine Inc., Wachovia Bank,
National Association as administrative agent for itself, Compass Bank and
Comerica Bank – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2007 (File
No. 1-13905).
|
10.8
|
Subordinated
Term Loan Promissory Note dated October 26, 2007 executed by the
Registrant and payable to the order of TIMET Finance Management Company –
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2007 (File No.
1-13905).
|
10.9
|
Agreement
Regarding Shared Insurance between the Registrant, Contran Corporation,
Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc., Kronos Worldwide, Inc., NL
Industries, Inc., Titanium Metals Corporation, and Valhi, Inc. dated
October 30, 2003 – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003.
|
10.10
|
$50,000,000
Credit Agreement between the Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Agent and various lending institutions dated December 23,
2005 – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006 Certain exhibits, annexes and similar attachments to this
Exhibit 10.12 have not been filed; upon request, the Registrant will
furnish supplementally to the SEC a copy of any omitted exhibit, annex, or
attachment.
|
- 30
-
Item
No. Exhibit Item
(continued)
10.11
|
First
Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of October 16, 2007 among CompX
International Inc., CompX Security Products Inc., CompX Precision Slides
Inc., CompX Marine Inc., Custom Marine Inc., Livorsi Marine Inc., Wachovia
Bank, National Association for itself and as administrative agent for
Compass Bank and Comerica Bank - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3
of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2007
(File No. 1-13905).
|
10.12
|
Second
Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of January 15, 2009 among CompX
International Inc., CompX Security Products Inc., CompX Precision Slides
Inc., CompX Marine Inc., Custom Marine Inc., Livorsi Marine Inc., Wachovia
Bank, National Association for itself and as administrative agent for
Compass Bank and Comerica Bank - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 21, 2009
(File No. 1-13905).
|
21.1
|
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant.
|
23.1
|
Consent
of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
|
31.1
|
Certification
|
31.2
|
Certification
|
32.1
|
Certification
|
*
Management contract, compensatory plan or
agreement.
|
- 31
-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
COMPX
INTERNATIONAL INC.
Date: February
25,
2009 By: /s/ David A.
Bowers
David A.
Bowers
Vice Chairman of the Board,
President
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
/s/ Glenn R.
Simmons
Glenn
R. Simmons
|
Chairman
of the Board
|
February
25, 2009
|
||
/s/ David A.
Bowers
David
A. Bowers
|
Vice
Chairman of the
Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
February
25, 2009
|
||
/s/ Darryl R.
Halbert
Darryl
R. Halbert
|
Vice
President,
Chief
Financial Officer
and
Controller
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
February
25, 2009
|
||
/s/ Paul M. Bass,
Jr.
Paul
M. Bass, Jr.
|
Director
|
February
25, 2009
|
||
/s/ Norman S.
Edelcup
Norman
S. Edelcup
|
Director
|
February
25, 2009
|
||
/s/ Edward J.
Hardin
Edward
J. Hardin
|
Director
|
February
25, 2009
|
||
/s/ Ann Manix
Ann
Manix
|
Director
|
February
25, 2009
|
||
/s/ Steven L.
Watson
Steven
L. Watson
|
Director
|
February
25, 2009
|
||
- 32
-
Annual
Report on Form 10-K
Items
8 and 15(a)
Index
of Financial Statements
Financial
Statements
|
Page
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-2
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets - December 31, 2007 and 2008
|
F-3
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations -
|
|
Years
ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008
|
F-5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) -
|
|
Years
ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008
|
F-6
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows -
|
|
Years
ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008
|
F-7
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders' Equity -
|
|
Years
ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008
|
F-9
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-10
|
All
financial statement schedules have been omitted either because they are not
applicable or required, or the information that would be required to be included
is disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of CompX International Inc.:
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CompX
International Inc. and its Subsidiaries at December 31, 2007 and 2008, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Dallas,
Texas
February 25,
2009
F-2
COMPX
INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands, except share data)
December 31,
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 18,399 | $ | 14,411 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $682 and $711
|
20,447 | 16,837 | ||||||
Receivables
from affiliates
|
223 | 1,472 | ||||||
Refundable
income taxes
|
68 | 83 | ||||||
Inventories
|
24,277 | 22,661 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
1,324 | 1,300 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,123 | 1,841 | ||||||
Current
portion of note and interest receivable
|
1,306 | 943 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
68,167 | 59,548 | ||||||
Other
assets:
|
||||||||
Goodwill
|
40,784 | 30,827 | ||||||
Other
intangible assets
|
2,569 | 1,991 | ||||||
Note
receivable
|
261 | - | ||||||
Assets
held for sale
|
3,117 | 3,517 | ||||||
Other
|
666 | 90 | ||||||
Total
other assets
|
47,397 | 36,425 | ||||||
Property
and equipment:
|
||||||||
Land
|
11,612 | 11,858 | ||||||
Buildings
|
38,990 | 36,642 | ||||||
Equipment
|
124,238 | 110,915 | ||||||
Construction
in progress
|
2,659 | 4,406 | ||||||
177,499 | 163,821 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
105,348 | 96,392 | ||||||
Net
property and equipment
|
72,151 | 67,429 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 187,715 | $ | 163,402 | ||||
F-3
COMPX
INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)
(In
thousands, except share data)
December 31,
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Current
maturities of note payable to affiliate
|
$ | 250 | $ | 1,000 | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
17,652 | 14,256 | ||||||
Interest
payable to affiliate
|
559 | 528 | ||||||
Income
taxes payable to affiliates and other
|
282 | 20 | ||||||
Income
taxes
|
170 | 1,167 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
18,913 | 16,971 | ||||||
Noncurrent
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Note
payable to affiliate
|
49,730 | 41,980 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes and other
|
14,969 | 13,174 | ||||||
Total
noncurrent liabilities
|
64,699 | 55,154 | ||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized,
none issued
|
- | - | ||||||
Class
A common stock, $.01 par value; 20,000,000
shares authorized; 2,478,760 and 2,361,307
shares issued and outstanding
|
25 | 24 | ||||||
Class
B common stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000
shares authorized, issued and outstanding
|
100 | 100 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
55,824 | 54,873 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
37,080 | 27,798 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
11,074 | 8,482 | ||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
104,103 | 91,277 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 187,715 | $ | 163,402 | ||||
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 12)
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
F-4
COMPX
INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
thousands, except per share data)
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 190,123 | $ | 177,683 | $ | 165,502 | ||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
143,649 | 132,455 | 125,248 | |||||||||
Gross
margin
|
46,474 | 45,228 | 40,254 | |||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expense
|
26,060 | 25,846 | 24,818 | |||||||||
Goodwill
impairment
|
- | - | 9,881 | |||||||||
Facility
consolidation expense
|
- | 2,665 | - | |||||||||
Other
operating income (expense):
|
||||||||||||
Currency
transaction gains (losses), net
|
145 | (1,086 | ) | 679 | ||||||||
Disposition
of property and equipment
|
(258 | ) | (75 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||||
Operating
income
|
20,301 | 15,556 | 6,186 | |||||||||
Other
non-operating income, net
|
1,270 | 1,133 | 240 | |||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(219 | ) | (760 | ) | (2,362 | ) | ||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
21,352 | 15,929 | 4,064 | |||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
9,696 | 6,949 | 7,165 | |||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 11,656 | $ | 8,980 | $ | (3,101 | ) | |||||
Basic
and diluted earnings (loss) per common
share
|
$ | .76 | $ | .61 | $ | (.25 | ) | |||||
Cash
dividends per share
|
$ | .50 | $ | .50 | $ | .50 | ||||||
Shares
used in the calculation of earnings per
share amounts for:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
15,244 | 14,764 | 12,386 | |||||||||
Dilutive
impact of stock options
|
13 | 8 | - | |||||||||
Diluted
shares
|
15,257 | 14,772 | 12,386 | |||||||||
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
F-5
COMPX
INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In
thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 11,656 | $ | 8,980 | $ | (3,101 | ) | |||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
||||||||||||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
(883 | ) | 2,996 | (2,718 | ) | |||||||
Impact
from cash flow hedges, net
|
(110 | ) | - | 126 | ||||||||
Total
other comprehensive income (loss), net
|
(993 | ) | 2,996 | (2,592 | ) | |||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
$ | 10,663 | $ | 11,976 | $ | (5,693 | ) | |||||
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
F-6
COMPX
INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands)
Years
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 11,656 | $ | 8,980 | $ | (3,101 | ) | |||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
11,797 | 11,010 | 9,231 | |||||||||
Goodwill
impairment
|
- | - | 9,881 | |||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,536 | (6,549 | ) | (45 | ) | |||||||
Other,
net
|
1,375 | 1,079 | 522 | |||||||||
Change
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
1,035 | 633 | 2,441 | |||||||||
Inventories
|
2,258 | (1,813 | ) | 389 | ||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(2,891 | ) | (619 | ) | (2,810 | ) | ||||||
Accounts
with affiliates
|
(274 | ) | 182 | (1,531 | ) | |||||||
Income
taxes
|
890 | (715 | ) | 1,047 | ||||||||
Other,
net
|
63 | (296 | ) | (307 | ) | |||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
27,445 | 11,892 | 15,717 | |||||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(12,044 | ) | (13,820 | ) | (6,791 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition,
net of cash acquired
|
(9,832 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Proceeds
from disposal of assets held for sale
|
- | - | 250 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of fixed assets
|
1,316 | 73 | 127 | |||||||||
Cash
collected on note receivable
|
1,306 | 1,306 | 1,306 | |||||||||
Net
cash used by investing activities
|
(19,254 | ) | (12,441 | ) | (5,108 | ) | ||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Principal
payments on long-term debt
|
(1,563 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Repayment
of loan from affiliate
|
- | (2,600 | ) | (7,000 | ) | |||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
347 | 1,395 | - | |||||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(7,623 | ) | (7,294 | ) | (6,181 | ) | ||||||
Tax
benefit from exercise of stock options
|
111 | 73 | - | |||||||||
Treasury
stock acquired
|
- | (3,309 | ) | (1,006 | ) | |||||||
Other,
net
|
(110 | ) | - | (56 | ) | |||||||
Net
cash used by financing activities
|
(8,838 | ) | (11,735 | ) | (14,243 | ) | ||||||
Net
decrease
|
$ | (647 | ) | $ | (12,284 | ) | $ | (3,634 | ) |
F-7
COMPX
INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(In
thousands)
Years
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||||||
Net
decrease from -
|
||||||||||||
Operating,
investing and financing activities
|
$ | (647 | ) | $ | (12,284 | ) | $ | (3,634 | ) | |||
Effect
of exchange rate on cash
|
(257 | ) | 995 | (354 | ) | |||||||
Balance
at beginning of year
|
30,592 | 29,688 | 18,399 | |||||||||
Balance
at end of year
|
$ | 29,688 | $ | 18,399 | $ | 14,411 | ||||||
Supplemental
disclosures:
|
||||||||||||
Cash
paid for:
|
||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 139 | $ | 109 | $ | 2,278 | ||||||
Income
taxes
|
7,418 | 14,365 | 8,062 | |||||||||
Noncash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Note
payable to affiliate issued for repurchase
of common stock
|
$ | - | $ | 52,580 | $ | - | ||||||
Accrual
for capital expenditures
|
$ | - | $ | 665 | $ | 511 | ||||||
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
F-8
COMPX
INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Years
ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008
(In
thousands)
Accumulated
other
comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock
|
Additional
paid-in
|
Retained
|
Currency
|
Hedging
|
Treasury
|
Total
stockholders'
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A
|
Class B
|
Capital
|
earnings
|
translation
|
derivatives
|
stock
|
equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
$ | 52 | $ | 100 | $ | 109,556 | $ | 31,320 | $ | 8,961 | $ | 110 | $ | - | $ | 150,099 | ||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | 11,656 | - | - | - | 11,656 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
- | - | - | - | (883 | ) | (110 | ) | - | (993 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends
|
- | - | - | (7,623 | ) | - | - | - | (7,623 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock and other, net
|
1 | - | 550 | - | - | - | - | 551 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
53 | 100 | 110,106 | 35,353 | 8,078 | - | - | 153,690 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | 8,980 | - | - | - | 8,980 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
- | - | - | - | 2,996 | - | - | 2,996 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in accounting principle-
FIN
No. 48
|
- | - | - | 41 | - | - | - | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends
|
- | - | - | (7,294 | ) | - | - | - | (7,294 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock and other, net
|
- | - | 1,579 | - | - | - | - | 1,579 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
stock:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (55,889 | ) | (55,889 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retired
|
(28 | ) | - | (55,861 | ) | - | - | - | 55,889 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
25 | 100 | 55,824 | 37,080 | 11,074 | - | - | 104,103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | (3,101 | ) | - | - | - | (3,101 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
- | - | - | - | (2,718 | ) | 126 | - | (2,592 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends
|
- | - | - | (6,181 | ) | - | - | - | (6,181 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock and other, net
|
- | - | 54 | - | - | - | - | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
stock:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (1,006 | ) | (1,006 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retired
|
(1 | ) | - | (1,005 | ) | - | - | - | 1,006 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$ | 24 | $ | 100 | $ | 54,873 | $ | 27,798 | $ | 8,356 | $ | 126 | $ | - | $ | 91,277 |
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
F-9
COMPX
INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
Note
1 - Summary of significant accounting policies:
Organization. We
(NYSE: CIX) are 87% owned by NL Industries, Inc. (NYSE: NL) at December 31,
2008. We manufacture and sell component products (security products,
precision ball bearing slides, ergonomic computer support systems and
performance marine components). At December 31, 2008, (i) Valhi, Inc.
holds approximately 83% of NL’s outstanding common stock and (ii) subsidiaries
of Contran Corporation hold approximately 94% of Valhi’s outstanding common
stock. Substantially all of Contran's outstanding voting stock is
held by trusts established for the benefit of certain children and grandchildren
of Harold C. Simmons (of which Mr. Simmons is sole trustee), or is held by Mr.
Simmons or persons or other entities related to Mr.
Simmons. Consequently, Mr. Simmons may be deemed to control each of
these companies and us.
Unless
otherwise indicated, references in this report to “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to
CompX International Inc. and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
Management
estimates. In preparing our financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”) we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at each balance sheet date and the reported amounts of our
revenues and expenses during each reporting period. Actual results
may differ significantly from previously-estimated amounts under different
assumptions or conditions.
Principles of
consolidation. Our consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of CompX International Inc. and our
majority-owned subsidiaries. We eliminate all material intercompany
accounts and balances. We have no involvement with any variable
interest entity covered by the scope of FASB Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities.
Fiscal
year. Our
fiscal year end is always the Sunday closest to December 31, and our operations
are reported on a 52 or 53-week fiscal year. Each of the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 consisted of 52 weeks.
Translation of
foreign currencies. We translate the
assets and liabilities of our subsidiaries whose functional currency is other
than the U.S. dollar at year-end rates of exchange, while we translate their
revenues and expenses at average exchange rates prevailing during the
year. We accumulate the resulting translation adjustments in
stockholders' equity as part of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
related deferred income taxes. We recognize currency transaction
gains and losses in income.
Cash and cash
equivalents. We classify as
cash and cash equivalents bank time deposits and government and commercial notes
and bills with original maturities of three months or less.
F-10
Net
sales. We record sales
when products are shipped and title and other risks and rewards of ownership
have passed to the customer. Amounts charged to customers for
shipping and handling are not material. Sales are stated net of
price, early payment and distributor discounts and volume rebates. We
report any tax assessed by a governmental authority that we collect from our
customers that is both imposed on and concurrent with our revenue producing
activities (such as sales, use, value added and excise taxes) on a net basis
(meaning we do not recognize these taxes either in our revenues or in our costs
and expenses.)
Accounts
receivable. We provide an allowance
for doubtful accounts for known and estimated potential losses rising from our
sales to customers based on a periodic review of these accounts.
Inventories and
cost of sales. We state inventories at the lower
of cost or market, net of allowance for obsolete and slow-moving
inventories. We generally base inventory costs on average cost that
approximates the first-in, first-out method. We allocate fixed
manufacturing overheads based on normal production capacity and recognize
abnormal manufacturing costs as period costs. Our cost of sales
includes costs for materials, packing and finishing, utilities, salary and
benefits, maintenance and depreciation.
Selling, general
and administrative expenses; advertising costs. Selling, general and
administrative expenses include costs related to marketing, sales, distribution,
research and development and administrative functions such as accounting,
treasury and finance, and includes costs for salaries and benefits, travel and
entertainment, promotional materials and professional fees. We
expense advertising and research development costs as
incurred. Advertising costs were approximately $872,000 in 2006,
$804,000 in 2007, and $840,000 in 2008.
Goodwill and
other intangible assets; amortization expense. Goodwill
represents the excess of cost over fair value of individual net assets acquired
in business combinations. Goodwill is not subject to periodic
amortization. We amortize other intangible assets, consisting
principally of certain acquired patents and tradenames, using the straight line
method over their estimated lives (approximately 3 to 8 years remaining at
December 31, 2008). We assess goodwill and other intangible assets
for impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. See Note 4.
Property and
equipment; depreciation expense. We state property and
equipment, including purchased computer software for internal use, at
cost. We compute depreciation of property and equipment for financial
reporting purposes principally by the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of 15 to 40 years for buildings and 3 to 20 years for equipment and
software. We use accelerated depreciation methods for income tax
purposes, as permitted. Depreciation expense was $11.4 million in
2006, $10.4 million in 2007, and $8.6 million in 2008. Upon sale or
retirement of an asset, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are
removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is recognized in income
currently. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and minor renewals
are expensed; expenditures for major improvements are capitalized.
We
evaluate assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate
that assets may be impaired to determine if an impairment
exists. Such events or changes in circumstances include, among other
things, (i) significant current and prior periods or current and projected
periods with operating losses, (ii) a significant decrease in the market value
of an asset or (iii) a significant change in the extent or manner in which an
asset is used. We consider all relevant factors. We
perform the impairment evaluation by comparing the estimated future undiscounted
cash flows (exclusive of interest expense) associated with the asset to the
asset's net carrying value to determine if a write-down to market value or
discounted cash flow value is required. We assess impairment of
property and equipment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. See Note 9.
F-11
Employee benefit
plans. We maintain various defined contribution plans in which
we make contributions based on matching or other formulas. Defined
contribution plan expense approximated $2.2 million in 2006, $2.5 million in
2007 and $2.1 million in 2008.
Self-insurance. We are partially
self-insured for workers' compensation and certain employee health benefits and
self-insured for most environmental issues. We purchase coverage in
order to limit our exposure to any significant levels of workers' compensation
or employee health benefit claims. We accrue self-insured losses
based upon estimates of the aggregate liability for uninsured claims incurred
using certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry and our
own historical claims experience.
Derivatives and
hedging activities. Certain of our sales generated by our
non-U.S. operations are denominated in U.S. dollars. We periodically
use currency forward contracts to manage a portion of currency exchange rate
market risk associated with receivables, or similar exchange rate risk
associated with future sales, denominated in a currency other than the holder's
functional currency. We have not entered into these contracts for
trading or speculative purposes in the past, nor do we anticipate entering into
such contracts for trading or speculative purposes in the
future. Most of our currency forward contracts meet the criteria for
hedge accounting under GAAP and are designated as cash flow
hedges. For these currency forward contracts, gains and losses
representing the effective portion of our hedges are deferred as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income, and are subsequently recognized in
earnings at the time the hedged item affects earnings. Occasionally,
we enter into currency forward contracts which do not meet the criteria for
hedge accounting. For these contracts, we mark-to-market
the estimated fair value of the contracts at each balance sheet date based on
quoted market prices for the forward contracts, with any resulting gain or loss
recognized in income currently as part of net currency
transactions. The quoted market prices for the forward contracts are
a Level 1 input as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. See Note 13. To manage such currency
exchange rate risk, at December 31, 2008, we held a series of contracts to
exchange an aggregate of U.S. $7.5 million for an equivalent value of Canadian
dollars at exchange rates ranging from Cdn. $1.25 to $1.26 per U.S.
dollar. These contracts qualified for hedge accounting and mature
through June 2009. The exchange rate was $1.22 per U.S. dollar at
December 31, 2008. The estimated fair value of the contracts was not
material at December 31, 2008. We had no currency forward contracts
outstanding at December 31, 2007.
Income
taxes. We are a member
of the Contran Tax Group. We have been and currently are a part of
the consolidated tax returns filed by Contran in certain United States state
jurisdictions. As a member of the Contran Tax Group, we are jointly
and severally liable for the federal income tax liability of Contran and the
other companies included in the Contran Tax Group for all periods in which we
are included in the Contran Tax Group. See Note 12.
As a
member of the Contran Tax Group, we are a party to a tax sharing agreement which
provides that we compute our provision for U.S. income taxes on a
separate-company basis. Pursuant to the tax sharing agreement, we make payments
to or receive payments from NL in amounts we would have paid to or received from
the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or the applicable state tax authority had we
not been a member of the Contran Tax Group. The separate company provisions and
payments are computed using the tax elections made by Contran. Under
certain circumstances, such tax regulations could require Contran to treat items
differently than we would on a stand alone basis, and in such instances GAAP
requires us to conform to Contran’s tax election. We made net cash
payments for taxes of $5.6 million in 2006, $9.5 million in 2007, and $5.2
million in 2008 to NL Industries, Inc.
F-12
Deferred
income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the income tax and financial
reporting carrying amounts of assets and liabilities, including undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries which are not permanently reinvested. Earnings
of foreign subsidiaries subject to permanent reinvestment plans aggregated $5.6
million, $5.7 million, and $5.6 million at December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability
on such permanent reinvestment plans was not practicable. We
periodically evaluate our deferred tax assets in the various taxing
jurisdictions in which we operate and adjust any related valuation allowance
based on the estimate of the amount of such deferred tax assets which we believe
do not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition criteria.
Prior to
2007, we provided a reserve for uncertain income tax positions when we believed
it was probable a tax position would not prevail with the applicable tax
authority and the amount of the lost benefit associated with such tax position
was reasonably estimable. Beginning in 2007, we record a reserve for
uncertain tax positions in accordance with FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertain Tax
Positions, for each tax position where we believe it is
more-likely-than-not our position will not prevail with the applicable tax
authorities. See Note 13.
Earnings per
share. Basic earnings
per share of common stock is computed using the weighted average number of
common shares actually outstanding during each period. Diluted
earnings per share of common stock includes the impact of outstanding dilutive
stock options. The weighted average number of outstanding stock
options excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because
their impact would have been antidilutive aggregated approximately 397,000 in
2006, 368,000 in 2007 and 172,000 in 2008.
Fair value of
financial instruments. The carrying amounts of
accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value due to their
short-term nature. We adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
which establishes a framework for measuring fair value on January 1,
2008. The statement requites fair value measurements to be classified
and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
·
|
Level 1 – Unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement
date for identical, unrestricted assets or
liabilities;
|
·
|
Level 2 – Quoted prices
in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the assets or
liability; and
|
·
|
Level 3 – Prices or
valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the
fair value measurement and
unobservable.
|
These
estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market
information or other appropriate valuation methodologies. The
carrying amount of our indebtedness approximates fair value due to the stated
variable interest rate approximating a market rate. The fair value of
our indebtedness is a Level 2 input. See Note 13.
Note
2 - Business and geographic segments:
Our
operating segments are defined as components of our operations about which
separate financial information is available that is regularly evaluated by our
chief operating decision maker in determining how to allocate resources and in
assessing performance. Our chief operating decision maker is Mr.
David A. Bowers, our president and chief executive officer. We have
three operating segments – Security Products, Furniture Components and Marine
Components. The Security Products segment, with a facility in South
Carolina and a facility shared with Marine Components in Illinois, manufactures
locking mechanisms and other security products for sale to the office furniture,
transportation, postal, banking, vending and other industries. The
Furniture Components segment, with facilities in Canada, Michigan and Taiwan,
manufactures and distributes a complete line of precision ball bearing slides
and ergonomic computer support systems for use in office furniture,
computer-related equipment, tool storage cabinets, appliances and other
applications. Our Marine Components segment with a facility in
Wisconsin and a facility shared with Security Products in Illinois manufactures
and distributes marine instruments, hardware and accessories for performance
boats.
F-13
In April
2006, we completed a marine component product business acquisition for aggregate
cash consideration of $9.8 million, net of cash acquired. The
purchase price was allocated among tangible and intangible net assets acquired
based upon an estimate of the fair value of such net assets.
The chief
operating decision maker evaluates segment performance based on segment
operating income, which is defined as income before income taxes, and interest
expense, exclusive of certain general corporate income and expense items
(primarily interest income) and certain non-recurring items (such as gains or
losses on the disposition of business units and other long-lived assets outside
the ordinary course of business). The accounting policies of the
reportable operating segments are the same as those described in Note
1. Capital expenditures include additions to property and equipment,
but exclude amounts attributable to business combinations.
Segment
assets are comprised of all assets attributable to the reportable
segments. Corporate assets are not attributable to the operating
segments and consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and notes receivable
and, at December 31, 2007 and 2008, assets held for sale. See Note
9. For geographic information, net sales are attributable to the
place of manufacture (point of origin) and the location of the customer (point
of destination); property and equipment are attributable to their physical
location. At December 31, 2007 and 2008, the net assets of non-U.S.
subsidiaries included in consolidated net assets approximated $40.5 million and
$32.8 million, respectively.
F-14
Years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||||
Security
Products
|
$ | 81,684 | $ | 80,085 | $ | 77,094 | ||||||
Furniture
Components
|
92,983 | 81,331 | 76,405 | |||||||||
Marine
Components
|
15,456 | 16,267 | 12,003 | |||||||||
Total
net sales
|
$ | 190,123 | $ | 177,683 | $ | 165,502 | ||||||
Operating
income:
|
||||||||||||
Security
Products
|
$ | 14,620 | $ | 12,218 | * | $ | 12,715 | |||||
Furniture
Components
|
10,036 | 8,001 | 9,205 | |||||||||
Marine
Components
|
822 | 799 | (10,456 | )** | ||||||||
Corporate
operating expenses
|
(5,177 | ) | (5,462 | ) | (5,278 | ) | ||||||
Total
operating income
|
20,301 | 15,556 | 6,186 | |||||||||
Other
non-operating income, net
|
1,270 | 1,133 | 240 | |||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(219 | ) | (760 | ) | (2,362 | ) | ||||||
Income
from continuing operations before income
taxes
|
$ | 21,352 | $ | 15,929 | $ | 4,064 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization:
|
||||||||||||
Security
Products
|
$ | 4,309 | $ | 4,574 | $ | 3,557 | ||||||
Furniture
Components
|
6,798 | 5,457 | 4,583 | |||||||||
Marine
Components
|
666 | 958 | 1,080 | |||||||||
Corporate
Depreciation
|
24 | 21 | 11 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 11,797 | $ | 11,010 | $ | 9,231 | ||||||
Capital
expenditures:
|
||||||||||||
Security
Products
|
$ | 5,335 | $ | 12,240 | $ | 4,348 | ||||||
Furniture
Components
|
1,504 | 1,349 | 1,823 | |||||||||
Marine
Components
|
5,205 | 896 | 1,131 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 12,044 | $ | 14,485 | $ | 7,302 | ||||||
Goodwill:
|
||||||||||||
Security
Products
|
$ | 23,742 | $ | 23,742 | $ | 23,742 | ||||||
Furniture
Components
|
7,135 | 7,160 | 7,085 | |||||||||
Marine
Components
|
9,882 | 9,882 | - | ** | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 40,759 | $ | 40,784 | $ | 30,827 |
* Includes
$2.7 million of costs related to the consolidation of three of our northern
Illinois facilities into one facility. See Note 9.
** We
recorded a $9.9 million goodwill impairment charge for Marine Components in
2008. This represents all of the goodwill we had previously
recognized for this reporting unit. See Note 4.
F-15
Years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||||
Point
of origin:
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 127,620 | $ | 118,460 | $ | 115,470 | ||||||
Canada
|
52,395 | 52,684 | 46,519 | |||||||||
Taiwan
|
15,910 | 11,714 | 8,268 | |||||||||
Eliminations
|
(5,802 | ) | (5,175 | ) | (4,755 | ) | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 190,123 | $ | 177,683 | $ | 165,502 | ||||||
Point
of destination:
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 153,942 | $ | 147,716 | $ | 134,247 | ||||||
Canada
|
19,985 | 19,251 | 16,920 | |||||||||
Other
|
16,196 | 10,716 | 14,335 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 190,123 | $ | 177,683 | $ | 165,502 | ||||||
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Total
assets:
|
||||||||||||
Security
Products
|
$ | 74,887 | $ | 80,051 | $ | 77,681 | ||||||
Furniture
Components
|
77,781 | 67,184 | 59,148 | |||||||||
Marine
Components
|
26,607 | 26,436 | 14,953 | |||||||||
Corporate
and eliminations
|
12,751 | 14,044 | 11,620 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 192,026 | $ | 187,715 | $ | 163,402 | ||||||
Net
property and equipment:
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 47,865 | $ | 50,876 | $ | 51,327 | ||||||
Canada
|
14,144 | 13,912 | 8,987 | |||||||||
Taiwan
|
7,679 | 7,363 | 7,115 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 69,688 | $ | 72,151 | $ | 67,429 | ||||||
Note
3 - Inventories:
December 31,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 6,341 | $ | 7,552 | ||||
Work
in process
|
9,783 | 8,225 | ||||||
Finished
products
|
8,153 | 6,884 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 24,277 | $ | 22,661 |
F-16
Note
4 – Goodwill and other intangible assets:
We have
assigned goodwill to each of our reporting units (as that term
is defined in SFAS No. 142) which correspond to our operating
segments. In accordance with SFAS No. 142 we test for goodwill
impairment at the reporting unit level. In accordance with the
requirements of SFAS No. 142, we review goodwill for each of our three reporting
units for impairment during the third quarter of each year or when circumstances
arise that indicate an impairment might be present. In determining
the estimated fair value of the reporting units, we use appropriate valuation
techniques, such as discounted cash flows. Such discounted cash flows
are a Level 3 input as defined by SFAS No. 157. If the fair value of
an evaluated asset is less than its book value, the asset is written down to
fair value.
During
the third quarter of 2008, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $9.9
million for our Marine Components reporting unit, which represented all of the
goodwill we had previously recognized for this reporting unit. We
used a discounted cash flow methodology in determining the estimated fair value
of our Marine Components reporting unit. The factors that led us to
conclude goodwill associated with our Marine Components reporting unit was fully
impaired include the continued decline in consumer spending in the marine market
as well as the overall negative economic outlook, both of which resulted
in near-term and longer-term reduced revenue, profit and cash flow
forecasts for the Marine Components unit. While we continue to
believe in the long term potential of the Marine Components reporting unit, due
to the extraordinary economic downturn in the marine industry we are not
currently able to foresee when the industry and our business will recover.
In response to the present economic conditions, we have taken steps to reduce
operating costs without inhibiting our ability to take advantage of
opportunities to expand our market share. When we performed this
analysis in the third quarter, we also reviewed the goodwill associated with our
Security Products and Furniture Components reporting units and concluded there
was no impairment of goodwill for those reporting units. Due to the
continued weakening of the economy, we re-evaluated the goodwill associated with
our Furniture Components reporting unit again in the fourth quarter of 2008 and
concluded no additional impairments were present. Our 2006 and 2007
annual impairment reviews of goodwill indicated no impairments.
Changes
in the carrying amount of goodwill related to our operations during the past
three years are presented in the table below. Goodwill was generated
principally from acquisitions of certain business units during 1998, 1999, 2000,
and Marine Components acquisitions in August 2005 and April 2006.
Security
Products
|
Furniture
Components
|
Marine
Components
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
(In
millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
$ | 23.7 | $ | 6.6 | $ | 5.4 | $ | 35.7 | ||||||||
Goodwill
acquired during the year
|
- | 0.4 | 4.5 | 4.9 | ||||||||||||
Changes
in currency exchange rates
|
- | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
23.7 | 7.1 | 9.9 | 40.7 | ||||||||||||
Changes
in currency exchange rates
|
- | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
23.7 | 7.2 | 9.9 | 40.8 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill
impairment
|
- | - | (9.9 | ) | (9.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Changes
in currency exchange rates
|
- | (0.1 | ) | - | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$ | 23.7 | $ | 7.1 | $ | - | $ | 30.8 |
F-17
Other
intangible assets are stated net of accumulated amortization of $3.1 million at
December 31, 2007 and $2.0 million at December 31, 2008.
Amortization
of intangible assets was $441,000 in 2006, $604,000 in 2007, and $591,000 in
2008, respectively. Estimated aggregate intangible asset amortization
expense for the next five years is as follows:
Years
ending December 31,
|
Amount
|
|||
(In
thousands)
|
||||
2009
|
$ | 600 | ||
2010
|
600 | |||
2011
|
400 | |||
2012
|
300 | |||
2013
|
100 | |||
Total
|
$ | 2,000 |
Note
5 - Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
December 31,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 7,139 | $ | 4,985 | ||||
Accrued
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Employee
benefits
|
7,196 | 6,571 | ||||||
Customer
tooling
|
736 | 787 | ||||||
Taxes
other than on income
|
572 | 447 | ||||||
Insurance
|
502 | 458 | ||||||
Professional
|
252 | 222 | ||||||
Reserve
for uncertain tax positions
|
237 | - | ||||||
Other
|
1,018 | 786 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 17,652 | $ | 14,256 |
Note
6 - Credit facility:
At
December 31, 2008, we had a $50 million revolving bank credit facility that
matured in January 2009. At December 31, 2008, we had no outstanding
draws against the credit facility and the full amount of the facility was
available for borrowing. In January 2009, we amended the terms of the
credit facility to extend the maturity date to January 15, 2012 and to reduce
the size of the facility from $50.0 million to $37.5 million. The
amended credit facility bears interest, at our option, at either the prime rate
plus a margin or LIBOR plus a margin. The credit facility is
collateralized by 65% of the ownership interests in our first-tier non-U.S.
subsidiaries. The facility contains certain covenants and
restrictions customary in lending transactions of this type, which among other
things, restricts our ability and that of our subsidiaries to incur debt, incur
liens, pay dividends or merge or consolidate with, or transfer all or
substantially all assets to, another entity. The facility also
requires maintenance of specified levels of net worth (as
defined). In the event of a change of control, as defined, the
lenders would have the right to accelerate the maturity of the
facility.
The
credit facility permits us to pay dividends and/or repurchase common stock in an
amount equal to the sum of (i) a dividend of $.125 per share in any calendar
quarter, not to exceed $8.0 million in any calendar year, plus (ii) $20.0
million plus 50% of aggregate net income over the term of the credit
facility. In addition to the permitted $.125 per share amount to
repurchase our common stock and/or to pay dividends, at December 31, 2008, $20.4
million was available for dividends and/or repurchases of our common stock under
the terms of the facility.
F-18
Note
7 - Income taxes:
The
components of pre-tax income, the provision for income taxes attributable to
continuing operations, the difference between the provision for income taxes and
the amount that would be expected using the U.S. federal statutory income tax
rate of 35%, and the comprehensive provision for income taxes are presented
below.
Years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Components
of pre-tax income:
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 14,022 | $ | 8,647 | $ | (5,253 | ) | |||||
Non-U.S.
|
7,330 | 7,282 | 9,317 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 21,352 | $ | 15,929 | $ | 4,064 | ||||||
Provision
for income taxes:
|
||||||||||||
Currently
payable:
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
federal and state
|
$ | 5,651 | $ | 9,902 | $ | 3,570 | ||||||
Foreign
|
2,509 | 3,596 | 3,640 | |||||||||
8,160 | 13,498 | 7,210 | ||||||||||
Deferred
income taxes (benefit):
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
federal and state
|
2,074 | (6,503 | ) | 117 | ||||||||
Foreign
|
(538 | ) | (46 | ) | (162 | ) | ||||||
1,536 | (6,549 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 9,696 | $ | 6,949 | $ | 7,165 | ||||||
Expected
tax expense, at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of
35%
|
$ | 7,473 | $ | 5,575 | $ | 1,422 | ||||||
Non-U.S.
tax rates
|
(298 | ) | (237 | ) | (328 | ) | ||||||
Incremental
U.S. tax on earnings of foreign subsidiaries
|
2,138 | 1,384 | 2,777 | |||||||||
State
income taxes and other, net
|
535 | 404 | 255 | |||||||||
No
income tax benefit on goodwill impairment
|
- | - | 3,459 | |||||||||
Canadian
tax rate change
|
(142 | ) | 152 | (4 | ) | |||||||
Tax
credits
|
(432 | ) | (329 | ) | (195 | ) | ||||||
Tax
contingency reserve adjustments, net
|
422 | - | (221 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 9,696 | $ | 6,949 | $ | 7,165 | ||||||
Comprehensive
provision for income taxes allocable to:
|
||||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
$ | 9,696 | $ | 6,949 | $ | 7,165 | ||||||
Other
comprehensive income – currency translation
|
1,210 | 1,580 | 1,479 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 10,906 | $ | 8,529 | $ | 8,644 |
F-19
The
goodwill impairment charge is not deductible for income tax purposes, and
therefore we did not recognize an income tax benefit related to the
charge.
The
components of net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are summarized
below.
December 31,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||
Tax
effect of temporary differences related to:
|
||||||||
Inventories
|
$ | 1,049 | $ | 850 | ||||
Tax
on unremitted earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries
|
(8,265 | ) | (5,615 | ) | ||||
Property
and equipment
|
(4,669 | ) | (5,442 | ) | ||||
Accrued
liabilities and other deductible differences
|
1,113 | 987 | ||||||
Tax
loss and credit carryforwards
|
4,191 | 4,112 | ||||||
Other
taxable differences
|
(2,364 | ) | (2,291 | ) | ||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(3,901 | ) | (3,901 | ) | ||||
Total
|
$ | (12,846 | ) | $ | (11,300 | ) | ||
Net
current deferred tax assets
|
2,123 | 1,821 | ||||||
Net
noncurrent deferred tax liabilities
|
(14,969 | ) | (13,121 | ) | ||||
Total
|
$ | (12,846 | ) | $ | (11,300 | ) | ||
At
December 31, 2008, we had, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, net operating
loss carryforwards of approximately $400,000 which expire in 2009 through
2017. Utilization of such net operating loss carryforwards is limited
to approximately $400,000 per tax year, and we utilized such $400,000 amount of
the carryforwards in each of 2006, 2007, and 2008. We believe it is
more-likely-than-not that the carryforwards will be utilized to reduce future
income tax liabilities, and accordingly we have not provided a deferred income
tax asset valuation allowance to offset the benefit of the
carryforwards.
We
generated a $3.9 million federal income tax benefit associated with a U.S.
capital loss realized in 2005. We determined based on the weight of
the available evidence that realization of the benefit of the capital loss did
not and continues not to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition
criteria. Therefore, we have also recognized a deferred income tax
asset valuation allowance to fully offset the deferred tax asset related to the
capital loss carryforward. The capital loss carryforward discussed
above expires in 2010.
F-20
Note
8 – Stockholders’ equity:
Shares of common stock
|
||||||||||||||||
Class A
|
Class B
|
|||||||||||||||
Issued
|
Treasury
|
Outstanding
|
Issued
and
outstanding
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
5,234,280 | - | 5,234,280 | 10,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Issued
|
32,700 | - | 32,700 | - | ||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
5,266,980 | - | 5,266,980 | 10,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Affiliate
repurchase:
|
||||||||||||||||
Issued
|
374,000 | - | 374,000 | 10,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Reacquired
|
- | (483,600 | ) | (483,600 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Retirement
|
(3,070,420 | ) | 483,600 | (2,586,820 | ) | (10,000,000 | ) | |||||||||
Total
affiliate repurchase
|
(2,696,420 | ) | - | (2,696,420 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Other:
|
||||||||||||||||
Issued
|
87,300 | - | 87,300 | - | ||||||||||||
Reacquired
|
- | (179,100 | ) | (179,100 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Retirement
|
(179,100 | ) | 179,100 | - | - | |||||||||||
Total
other
|
(91,800 | ) | - | (91,800 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
2,478,760 | - | 2,478,760 | 10,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Issued
|
9,000 | - | 9,000 | - | ||||||||||||
Reacquired
|
- | (126,453 | ) | (126,453 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Retirement
|
(126,453 | ) | 126,453 | - | - | |||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
2,361,307 | - | 2,361,307 | 10,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Class A and Class B common
stock. The shares of Class A common stock and Class B common
stock are identical in all respects, except for certain voting rights and
certain conversion rights in respect of the shares of the Class B common
stock. Holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per
share. NL Industries, Inc. (“NL”), which holds all of the outstanding
shares of Class B common stock, is entitled to one vote per share in all matters
except for election of directors, for which NL is entitled to ten votes per
share. Holders of all classes of common stock entitled to vote will
vote together as a single class on all matters presented to the stockholders for
their vote or approval, except as otherwise required by applicable
law. Each share of Class A common stock and Class B common stock have
an equal and ratable right to receive dividends to be paid from our assets when,
and if declared by the board of directors. In the event of the
dissolution, liquidation or winding up of our operations, the holders of Class A
common stock and Class B common stock will be entitled to share equally and
ratably in the assets available for distribution after payments are made to our
creditors and to the holders of any of our preferred stock that may be
outstanding at the time. Shares of the Class A common stock have no
conversion rights. Under certain conditions, shares of Class B common
stock will convert, on a share-for-share basis, into shares of Class A common
stock.
Share repurchases and
cancellations. In August 2007, our board of directors
authorized the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares of our Class A common stock in
open market transactions, including block purchases, or in privately-negotiated
transactions at unspecified prices and over an unspecified period of
time. This authorization was in addition to the 467,000 shares of
Class A common stock that remained available at the close of business on August
9, 2007 for repurchase under prior authorizations of our board of
directors. We may repurchase our common stock from time to time as
market conditions permit. The stock repurchase program does not
include specific price targets or timetables and may be suspended at any
time. Depending on market conditions, we may terminate the program
prior to its completion. We will use cash on hand to acquire the
shares. Repurchased shares will be added to our treasury and
cancelled.
F-21
During
2007 and 2008, we purchased approximately 179,100 and 126,453 shares of our
Class A common stock in market transactions for an aggregate of $3.3 million and
$1.0 million in cash, respectively. We cancelled these treasury
shares and allocated their cost to common stock at par value and additional
paid-in capital. At December 31, 2008, approximately 678,000 shares
were available for purchase under these repurchase authorizations.
In
October 2007, our board of directors authorized the repurchase or cancellation
of a net 2.7 million shares of our Class A common stock held directly and
indirectly by TIMET. We purchased or cancelled these shares for
$19.50 per share, or aggregate consideration of $52.6 million, which we paid in
the form of a promissory note. The price per share was determined
based on our open market repurchases of our Class A common stock around the time
the repurchase or cancellation of these shares was approved. The
authorization for the repurchase or cancellation of these Class A shares from
TIMET was in addition to the share repurchase authorizations discussed
above. See Note 11. We allocated the cost of these
repurchases and/or cancellations to common stock at par value and additional
paid-in capital.
Incentive compensation
plan. The CompX International Inc. 1997 Long-Term Incentive
Plan provides for the award or grant of stock options, stock appreciation
rights, performance grants and other awards to employees and other individuals
who provide services to us. Up to 1.5 million shares of Class A
Common Stock may be issued pursuant to the plan. Employee stock
options are granted at prices not less than the market price of our stock on the
date of grant, vest over five years and expire ten years from the date of
grant. The following table sets forth changes in outstanding options
during the past three years.
Shares
|
Exercise
price
per
share
|
Amount
payable
upon
exercise
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
|||||||||||||
(In
000’s)
|
||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
470 | $ | 10.00 – 20.00 | $ | 8,637 | $ | 18.38 | |||||||||
Exercised
|
(27 | ) | 13.00 | (347 | ) | 13.00 | ||||||||||
Canceled
|
(6 | ) | 20.00 | (120 | ) | 20.00 | ||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
437 | $ | 10.00 – 20.00 | $ | 8,170 | $ | 18.70 | |||||||||
Exercised
|
(81 | ) | 10.00 – 20.00 | (1,394 | ) | 17.21 | ||||||||||
Canceled
|
(7 | ) | 17.94 - 20.00 | (133 | ) | 19.00 | ||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
349 | $ | 12.15 – 20.00 | $ | 6,643 | $ | 19.03 | |||||||||
Canceled
|
(215 | ) | 20.00 | (4,300 | ) | 20.00 | ||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
134 | $ | 12.15 – 19.25 | $ | 2,343 | $ | 17.49 |
F-22
Outstanding
options at December 31, 2008 represent approximately 1% of our total outstanding
shares of common stock at that date and expire at various dates through 2012
with a weighted-average remaining term of approximately 1 year. Our
market price per share at December 31, 2008 was $5.28. Of the 134,000
outstanding options, which were fully vested at December 31, 2008, all 134,000
options were exercisable at prices higher than the December 31, 2008 market
price per share. At December 31, 2008, an aggregate of 878,820 shares
were available for future grants. Shares issued under the incentive
stock plan are generally newly-issued shares. The intrinsic value of
our options exercised aggregate approximately $123,900 in 2006 and $241,400 in
2007 and the related income tax benefit from the exercises was $44,000 in 2006
and $77,000 in 2007. No stock options were exercised in
2008.
Note
9 – Facility consolidation
Prior to
2007, we had three facilities in northern Illinois, two Security Products
facilities (located in Lake Bluff, Illinois and River Grove, Illinois) and one
Marine Components facility (located in Grayslake, Illinois). In order
to create opportunities to reduce operating costs and improve operating
efficiencies, we determined that it would be more effective to consolidate these
three operations into one location. In 2006, we acquired land
adjacent to the Marine Components facility for approximately $1.8 million in
order to expand the facility, and during 2007 we incurred approximately $9.6
million of capital expenditures in connection with the expansion.
In
addition to the capital expenditures, during 2007, we incurred approximately
$2.7 million in expenses relating to the facility consolidation including
physical move costs, equipment installation, redundant labor and recruiting fees
and write downs for fixed assets no longer in use, all of which are included in
facility consolidation expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of
Income. The majority of these costs were incurred during the fourth
quarter of 2007.
The fixed
asset write downs amounted to $765,000 of which $600,000 related to the
classification of the River Grove facility as an “asset held for sale” in
November 2007 as it was no longer being utilized and met all of the criteria
under GAAP to be classified as an “asset held for sale.” In
classifying the facility and related assets (primarily land, building, and
building improvements) as held for sale, we concluded that the carrying amount
of the assets exceeded the estimated fair value less costs to sell such
assets. In determining the estimated fair value of such assets, we
considered recent sales prices for other property near the facility, Level 2
inputs as defined by SFAS No. 157. Accordingly, we recognized
$600,000 to write-down the assets to their estimated net realizable value of
approximately $3.1 million at December 31, 2007. We expect to dispose
of the River Grove facility during 2009. The Lake Bluff, Illinois
facility was sold in 2006 for approximately $1.3 million which approximated book
value and was leased-back until we vacated the facility in October
2007.
Note
10 – Other non-operating income, net:
Years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$ | 1,278 | $ | 1,324 | $ | 389 | ||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
(8 | ) | (191 | ) | (149 | ) | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,270 | $ | 1,133 | $ | 240 | ||||||
F-23
Note
11 - Related party transactions:
We may be
deemed to be controlled by Harold C. Simmons. See Note
1. Corporations that may be deemed to be controlled by or affiliated
with Mr. Simmons sometimes engage in (a) intercorporate transactions such as
guarantees, management and expense sharing arrangements, shared fee
arrangements, joint ventures, partnerships, loans, options, advances of funds on
open account, and sales, leases and exchanges of assets, including securities
issued by both related and unrelated parties and (b) common investment and
acquisition strategies, business combinations, reorganizations,
recapitalizations, securities repurchases, and purchases and sales (and other
acquisitions and dispositions) of subsidiaries, divisions or other business
units, which transactions have involved both related and unrelated parties and
have included transactions which resulted in the acquisition by one related
party of a publicly-held minority equity interest in another related
party. We continuously consider, review and evaluate, and understand
that Contran and related entities consider, review and evaluate such
transactions. Depending upon the business, tax and other objectives
then relevant, it is possible that we might be a party to one or more such
transactions in the future.
In 2007,
we purchased and/or cancelled a net 2.7 million shares of our Class A common
stock from TIMET. A subsidiary of Contran and persons and other
entities related to Mr. Simmons own an aggregate of approximately 52% of TIMET’s
outstanding common stock at December 31, 2007. We purchased and/or
cancelled these shares for $19.50 per share, or aggregate consideration of $52.6
million, which we paid in the form of a promissory note. The price
per share was determined based on our open market repurchases of our Class A
common stock around the time the repurchase from TIMET was
approved. The promissory note bears interest at LIBOR plus 1% (5.05%
at December 31, 2008) and provides for quarterly principal repayments of
$250,000 commencing in September 2008, with the balance due at maturity in
September 2014. The promissory note is subordinated to our U.S.
revolving bank credit agreement. See Note 6. We may make
prepayments on the promissory note payable to TIMET at any time, in any amount,
without penalty. During 2007 and 2008, we prepaid approximately $2.6
million and $7.0 million, respectively, of the promissory note. At
December 31, 2007 and 2008, approximately $50.0 million and $43.0 million,
respectively, was outstanding under the promissory note, of which $250,000 and
$1.0 million, respectively, was classified as a current liability. The scheduled
repayments of the promissory note are shown in the table below.
Years ending December 31,
|
Amount
|
|||
(In
thousands)
|
||||
2009
|
$ | 1,000 | ||
2010
|
1,000 | |||
2011
|
1,000 | |||
2012
|
1,000 | |||
2013
|
1,000 | |||
2014
|
37,980 | |||
Total
|
$ | 42,980 |
Under the
terms of various Intercorporate Service Agreements (“ISAs”) with Contran,
employees of Contran perform certain management, tax planning, financial, legal
and administrative services for us on a fee basis. Such fees are
based upon estimates of time devoted to our affairs by individual Contran
employees and the compensation of such persons. Because of the large
number of companies affiliated with Contran, we believe we benefit from cost
savings and economies of scale gained by not having certain management,
financial and administrative staffs duplicated at each entity, thus allowing
certain individuals to provide services to multiple companies but only be
compensated by one entity. Fees pursuant to these agreements
aggregated $2.7 million in 2006, $2.9 million in 2007 and $3.1 million in
2008.
F-24
Tall Pines
Insurance Company and EWI RE, Inc. provide for or broker certain insurance
policies for Contran and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, including
us. Tall Pines and EWI are subsidiaries of
Valhi. Consistent with insurance industry practices, Tall Pines and
EWI receive commissions from the insurance and reinsurance underwriters and/or
assess fees for the policies that they provide or broker. The
aggregate premiums paid to Tall Pines and EWI were approximately $1.2 million in
2006, $1.1 million in 2007 and $1.2 million in 2008. These amounts
principally included payments for insurance, but also included commissions paid
to Tall Pines and EWI. Tall Pines purchases reinsurance for
substantially all of the risks it underwrites. We expect that these
relationships with Tall Pines and EWI will continue in
2009.
Contran and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, including us, purchase certain of their insurance policies as a group, with the costs of the jointly-owned policies being apportioned among the participating companies. With respect to certain of these policies, it is possible that unusually large losses incurred by one or more insureds during a given policy period could leave the other participating companies without adequate coverage under that policy for the balance of the policy period. As a result, Contran and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, including us, have entered into a loss sharing agreement under which any uninsured loss is shared by those entities who have submitted claims under the relevant policy. We believe the benefits in the form of reduced premiums and broader coverage associated with the group coverage for such policies justifies the risk associated with the potential for any uninsured loss.
Note
12 - Commitments and contingencies:
Legal
proceedings. We are
involved, from time to time, in various contractual, product liability, patent
(or intellectual property), employment and other claims and disputes incidental
to our business. On February 10, 2009, a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) by Humanscale Corporation requesting
that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930 to determine allegations concerning the unlawful importation of certain
adjustable keyboard related products into the U.S. by our Canadian
subsidiary. The products are alleged to infringe certain claims under
a U.S. patent held by Humanscale. The complaint seeks as relief the
barring of future imports of the products into the U.S. until the expiration of
the related patent in March 2011. Additionally, on February 13, 2009, a
complaint for patent infringement was filed in the United States District Court,
Eastern District of Virginia, by Humanscale against us and our Canadian
subsidiary. We have not been served in this matter as of the filing
of our annual report on Form 10-K, however, we deny the allegations of
infringement noted in this complaint. We intend to deny the
infringement before the ITC and seek to dismiss the complaint. We
currently believe that the disposition of all claims and disputes, individually
or in the aggregate, if any, should not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial condition, results of operations or
liquidity.
Environmental matters and litigation. Our operations are governed by various federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations. Our policy is to comply with environmental laws and regulations at all of our plants and to continually strive to improve environmental performance in association with applicable industry initiatives. We believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable requirements of environmental laws. From time to time, we may be subject to environmental regulatory enforcement under various statutes, resolution of which typically involves the establishment of compliance programs.
Income taxes. From
time to time, we undergo examinations of our income tax returns, and tax
authorities have or may propose tax deficiencies. We believe that we
have adequately provided accruals for additional income taxes and related
interest expense which may ultimately result from such examinations and we
believe that the ultimate disposition of all such examinations should not have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or liquidity.
We have
agreed to a policy with Contran providing for the allocation of tax liabilities
and tax payments as described in Note 1. Under applicable law, we, as
well as every other member of the Contran Tax Group, are each jointly and
severally liable for the aggregate federal income tax liability of Contran and
the other companies included in the Contran Tax Group for all periods in which
we are included in the Contran Tax Group. NL has agreed, however, to
indemnify us for any liability for income taxes of the Contran Tax Group in
excess of our tax liability previously computed and paid by us in accordance
with the tax allocation policy.
F-25
Concentration of credit
risk. Our products are sold primarily in North America to
original equipment manufacturers. The ten largest customers accounted
for approximately 38% of sales in 2006, 31% in 2007 and 35% in
2008. No customer accounted for sales of 10% or more in 2006, 2007,
or 2008.
Rent
expense, principally for buildings, was $787,000 in 2006, $429,000 in 2007 and
$461,000 in 2008. At December 31, 2008, future minimum rentals under
noncancellable operating leases are shown below.
Years ending December 31,
|
Amount
|
|||
(In
thousands)
|
||||
2009
|
$ | 400 | ||
2010
|
156 | |||
2011
|
145 | |||
2012
|
16 | |||
Total
|
$ | 717 |
Note
13 – Recent accounting pronouncements:
Fair Value Measurements – In September 2006, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements, which became effective for us on January 1,
2008. SFAS No. 157 generally provides a consistent, single fair value
definition and measurement techniques for GAAP pronouncements. SFAS
No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy for different measurement
techniques based on the objective nature of the inputs in various valuation
methods. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
157 which will delay the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for one year for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis (at least annually). All of our fair value measurements are in
compliance with SFAS No. 157, on a prospective basis, beginning in the first
quarter of 2008, except for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, which we will
be required to be in compliance with SFAS No. 157 prospectively beginning in the
first quarter of 2009. In addition, we have expanded our disclosures
regarding the valuation methods and level of inputs we utilize, except for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities, which will require disclosure in the first
quarter of 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a
material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fair Value Option – In the
first quarter of 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS 159 permits companies to
choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value,
with unrealized gains and losses included in the determination of net
income. The decision to elect the fair value option is generally applied
on an instrument-by-instrument basis, is irrevocable unless a new election date
occurs, and is applied to the entire instrument and not to only specified risks
or cash flows or a portion of the instrument. Items eligible for the fair
value option include recognized financial assets and liabilities, other than an
investment in a consolidated subsidiary, defined benefit pension plans, OPEB
plans, leases and financial instruments classified in equity. An
investment accounted for by the equity method is an eligible item. The
specified election dates include the date the company first recognizes the
eligible item, the date the company enters into an eligible commitment, the date
an investment first becomes eligible to be accounted for by the equity method
and the date SFAS No. 159 first becomes effective for the
company. SFAS No. 159 became effective for us on January 1,
2008. We did not elect to measure any eligible items at fair value in
accordance with this new standard either at the date we adopted the new standard
or subsequently during the first nine months of 2008; therefore the adoption of
this standard did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
F-26
Business Combinations –
Also in December
2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, which
applies to us prospectively for business combinations that close in 2009 and
beyond. The statement expands the definition of a business
combination to include more transactions including some asset purchases and
requires an acquirer to recognize assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date at fair value as
of that date with limited exceptions. The statement also requires
that acquisition costs be expensed as incurred and restructuring costs that are
not a liability of the acquiree at the date of the acquisition be recognized in
accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with
Exit or Disposal Activities. Due to the unpredictable nature
of business combinations and the prospective application of this statement we
are unable to predict the impact of the statement on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Derivative Disclosures – In
March 2008 the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No.
133. SFAS No. 161 changes the disclosure requirements for
derivative instruments and hedging activities to provide enhanced disclosures
about how and why we use derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and
related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect our financial position and
performance and cash flows. This statement will become effective for us in
the first quarter of 2009. We periodically use currency forward contracts
to manage a portion of our foreign currency exchange rate market risk associated
with trade receivables or future sales. The contracts we have outstanding
at December 31, 2008 are accounted for under hedge accounting. See
Note 1. Because our prior disclosures regarding these forward contracts
have substantially met all of the applicable disclosure requirements of the new
standard, we do not believe the enhanced disclosure requirements of this new
standard will have a significant effect on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Uncertain tax positions -
In the
second quarter of 2006 the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertain Tax
Positions, which we adopted on January 1, 2007. FIN 48
clarifies when and how much of a benefit we can recognize in our consolidated
financial statements for certain positions taken in our income tax returns under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
and enhances the disclosure requirements for our income tax policies and
reserves. Among other things, FIN 48 prohibits us from recognizing
the benefits of a tax position unless we believe it is more-likely-than-not our
position will prevail with the applicable tax authorities and limits the amount
of the benefit to the largest amount for which we believe the likelihood of
realization is greater than 50%. FIN 48 also requires companies to
accrue penalties and interest on the difference between tax positions taken on
their tax returns and the amount of benefit recognized for financial reporting
purposes under the new standard. We are required to classify any
future reserves for uncertain tax positions in a separate current or noncurrent
liability, depending on the nature of the tax position. Our adoption
of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position
or results of operations. Upon adopting FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, we
recognized a $41,000 increase to retained earnings.
We accrue
interest and penalties on our uncertain tax positions as a component of our
provision for income taxes. The amount of interest and penalties we
accrued at December 31, 2007 was $45,000 and nil at December 31,
2008.
The
following table shows the changes in the amount of our uncertain tax positions
(exclusive of the effect of interest and penalties) during 2007 and
2008:
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||
Unrecognized
tax benefits:
|
||||||||
Amount
at adoption of FIN 48 (or beginning of
the year)
|
$ | (585 | ) | $ | (192 | ) | ||
Tax
positions take in prior periods:
|
||||||||
Gross
increases
|
- | - | ||||||
Gross
decreases
|
6 | - | ||||||
Tax
positions taken in current period:
|
||||||||
Gross
increases
|
- | - | ||||||
Gross
decreases
|
- | - | ||||||
Settlements
with taxing authorities – cash paid
|
301 | - | ||||||
Lapse
of applicable statute of limitations
|
86 | 192 | ||||||
Amount
at end of the year
|
$ | (192 | ) | $ | - | |||
F-27
Pursuant
to the expiration of certain statue of limitations, we released the balance of
the FIN 48 liability in the third quarter of 2008.
We file
income tax returns in various U.S. federal, state and local jurisdictions.
We also file income tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions, principally in
Canada and Taiwan. Our domestic income tax returns prior to 2005 are
generally considered closed to examination by applicable tax authorities.
Our foreign income tax returns are generally considered closed to examination
for years prior to 2003 for Taiwan, and 2004 for Canada.
Note
14 – Quarterly results of operations (unaudited):
Quarter ended
|
||||||||||||||||
March 31
|
June 30
|
Sept. 30
|
Dec. 31
|
|||||||||||||
(In
millions, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||
2007:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 43.6 | $ | 45.2 | $ | 46.4 | $ | 42.5 | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
12.1 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 9.3 | ||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
5.4 | 4.6 | 4.3 | (a) | 1.2 | (a) | ||||||||||
Net
income
|
3.0 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted earnings per share
|
$ | .20 | $ | .17 | $ | .18 | $ | .04 |
2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 40.5 | $ | 43.7 | $ | 43.9 | $ | 37.4 | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
9.9 | 11.0 | 11.2 | 8.1 | ||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
3.5 | 4.5 | (4.9 | )(b) | 3.1 | |||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
1.6 | 2.1 | (7.5 | )(b) | 0.7 | |||||||||||
Basic
and diluted earnings (loss) per
share
|
$ | .13 | $ | .17 | $ | (.61 | ) | $ | .06 |
The sum
of the quarterly per share amounts may not equal the annual per share amounts
due to relative changes in the weighted-average number of shares used in the per
share computations.
(a) Quarterly
operating income for the quarters ended September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007
was impacted by $808,000 and $1.9 million, respectively, of costs related to the
consolidation of three of our northern Illinois facilities into one new facility
including a $600,000 charge to write-down a vacated facility to its estimated
net realizable value. See Note 9.
F-28
(b)
We recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $9.9 million for our
Marine Components reporting unit in the third quarter of 2008. See
Note 4.
F-29