COUSINS PROPERTIES INC - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-11312
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
GEORGIA (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
58-0869052 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
191 Peachtree Street, Suite 500, Atlanta, Georgia (Address of principal executive offices) |
30303-1740 (Zip Code) |
(404) 407-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at August 1, 2011 | |
Common Stock, $1 par value per share | 103,717,435 shares |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain matters contained in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the federal securities laws and are subject to uncertainties and risks, as itemized in Item 1A
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. These
forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of the
Companys business and the Companys financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans
and objectives. They also include, among other things, statements regarding subjects that are
forward-looking by their nature, such as:
| the Companys business and financial strategy; |
| the Companys ability to obtain future financing arrangements; |
| the Companys understanding of its competition and its ability to compete
effectively; |
| potential acquisitions, new investments and/or dispositions; |
| projected operating results; |
| market and industry trends; |
| estimates relating to future distributions; |
| projected capital expenditures; and |
| interest rates. |
The forward-looking statements are based upon managements beliefs, assumptions and
expectations of the Companys future performance, taking into account information currently
available. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations may change as a result of many possible
events or factors, not all of which are known. If a change occurs, the Companys business,
financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed
in forward-looking statements. Actual results may vary from forward-looking statements due to, but
not limited to, the following:
| availability and terms of capital and financing, both to fund operations and to
refinance indebtedness as it matures; |
| risks and uncertainties related to national and local economic conditions, the real
estate industry in general and in specific markets, and the commercial and residential
markets in particular; |
| continued adverse market and economic conditions requiring the recognition of
additional impairment losses; |
| leasing risks, including an inability to obtain new tenants or renew tenants on
favorable terms, or at all, upon the expiration of existing leases and the ability to
lease newly developed or currently unleased space; |
| financial condition of existing tenants; |
| rising interest rates and insurance rates; |
| the availability of sufficient development or investment opportunities; |
| competition from other developers or investors; |
| the risks associated with development projects (such as construction delay, cost
overruns and leasing/sales risk of new properties); |
| potential liability for uninsured losses, condemnation or environmental issues; |
| potential liability for a failure to meet regulatory requirements; |
| the financial condition and liquidity of, or disputes with, joint venture partners; |
| any failure to comply with debt covenants under credit agreements; and |
| any failure to continue to qualify for taxation as a real estate investment trust. |
The words believes, expects, anticipates, estimates, plans, may, intend, will,
or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although the Company
believes its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are
reasonable, the Company can give no assurance that such plans, intentions or expectations will be
achieved. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statement, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise, except as required
under U.S. federal securities laws.
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
PROPERTIES: |
||||||||
Operating properties, net of accumulated depreciation
of $298,085 and $274,925 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
$ | 868,155 | $ | 898,119 | ||||
Land held for investment or future development |
120,557 | 123,879 | ||||||
Residential lots |
63,725 | 63,403 | ||||||
Other |
738 | 2,994 | ||||||
Total properties |
1,053,175 | 1,088,395 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
4,349 | 7,599 | ||||||
RESTRICTED CASH |
14,544 | 15,521 | ||||||
NOTES AND OTHER RECEIVABLES, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $5,646 and $6,287 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
50,405 | 48,395 | ||||||
INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES |
179,149 | 167,108 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
35,510 | 44,264 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 1,337,132 | $ | 1,371,282 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
NOTES PAYABLE |
$ | 498,034 | $ | 509,509 | ||||
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES |
35,710 | 32,388 | ||||||
DEFERRED GAIN |
4,098 | 4,216 | ||||||
DEPOSITS AND DEFERRED INCOME |
17,419 | 18,029 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
555,261 | 564,142 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES |
||||||||
REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
9,444 | 14,289 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, 20,000,000 shares authorized, $1 par value: |
||||||||
7.75% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock, $25 liquidation
preference; 2,993,090 shares issued and outstanding in 2011 and 2010 |
74,827 | 74,827 | ||||||
7.50% Series B cumulative redeemable preferred stock, $25 liquidation
preference; 3,791,000 shares issued and outstanding in 2011 and 2010 |
94,775 | 94,775 | ||||||
Common stock, $1 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 107,283,901 and
106,961,959 shares issued in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
107,284 | 106,962 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
685,577 | 684,551 | ||||||
Treasury stock at cost, 3,570,082 shares in 2011 and 2010 |
(86,840 | ) | (86,840 | ) | ||||
Distributions in excess of cumulative net income |
(136,075 | ) | (114,196 | ) | ||||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
739,548 | 760,079 | ||||||
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests |
32,879 | 32,772 | ||||||
TOTAL EQUITY |
772,427 | 792,851 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
$ | 1,337,132 | $ | 1,371,282 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
REVENUES: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental property revenues |
$ | 36,736 | $ | 35,969 | $ | 72,884 | $ | 70,742 | ||||||||
Fee income |
3,435 | 3,728 | 6,820 | 7,272 | ||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing revenues |
4,605 | 4,485 | 8,693 | 9,279 | ||||||||||||
Multi-family residential unit sales |
7 | 7,943 | 4,664 | 18,089 | ||||||||||||
Residential lot and outparcel sales |
80 | 316 | 245 | 14,135 | ||||||||||||
Other |
556 | 171 | 1,069 | 295 | ||||||||||||
45,419 | 52,612 | 94,375 | 119,812 | |||||||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental property operating expenses |
15,472 | 15,246 | 29,720 | 29,777 | ||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing expenses |
4,080 | 4,214 | 8,173 | 9,172 | ||||||||||||
Multi-family residential unit cost of sales |
(13 | ) | 6,108 | 2,487 | 14,078 | |||||||||||
Residential lot and outparcel cost of sales |
76 | 275 | 145 | 9,371 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
6,133 | 6,763 | 13,533 | 14,780 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
7,358 | 10,286 | 14,902 | 20,067 | ||||||||||||
Reimbursed expenses |
1,371 | 1,398 | 2,883 | 3,257 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
13,375 | 14,231 | 26,850 | 27,407 | ||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
| 586 | 3,508 | 586 | ||||||||||||
Separation expenses |
77 | 33 | 178 | 101 | ||||||||||||
Other |
672 | 3,002 | 1,534 | 3,864 | ||||||||||||
48,601 | 62,142 | 103,913 | 132,460 | |||||||||||||
LOSS ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT |
| | | (592 | ) | |||||||||||
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES,
UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES AND SALE OF
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES |
(3,182 | ) | (9,530 | ) | (9,538 | ) | (13,240 | ) | ||||||||
(PROVISION) BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES FROM OPERATIONS |
(27 | ) | (14 | ) | 37 | 1,132 | ||||||||||
INCOME FROM UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES |
2,312 | 2,394 | 4,808 | 5,314 | ||||||||||||
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE GAIN
ON SALE OF INVESTMENT PROPERTIES |
(897 | ) | (7,150 | ) | (4,693 | ) | (6,794 | ) | ||||||||
GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMENT PROPERTIES |
59 | 1,061 | 118 | 1,817 | ||||||||||||
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
(838 | ) | (6,089 | ) | (4,575 | ) | (4,977 | ) | ||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
40 | 1,305 | 112 | 2,373 | ||||||||||||
Loss on sale of investment properties |
| | (384 | ) | | |||||||||||
40 | 1,305 | (272 | ) | 2,373 | ||||||||||||
NET LOSS |
(798 | ) | (4,784 | ) | (4,847 | ) | (2,604 | ) | ||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
(681 | ) | (584 | ) | (1,262 | ) | (1,110 | ) | ||||||||
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONTROLLING INTEREST |
(1,479 | ) | (5,368 | ) | (6,109 | ) | (3,714 | ) | ||||||||
DIVIDENDS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS |
(3,227 | ) | (3,227 | ) | (6,454 | ) | (6,454 | ) | ||||||||
NET LOSS AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
$ | (4,706 | ) | $ | (8,595 | ) | $ | (12,563 | ) | $ | (10,168 | ) | ||||
PER COMMON SHARE INFORMATION BASIC AND DILUTED: |
||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations attributable to controlling interest |
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 0.01 | | 0.02 | ||||||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders basic and diluted |
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | ||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES BASIC AND DILUTED |
103,659 | 101,001 | 103,588 | 100,538 | ||||||||||||
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 0.045 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited, in thousands)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited, in thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Loss on | Distributions in | Nonredeemable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | Paid-In | Treasury | Derivative | Excess of | Stockholders | Noncontrolling | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Stock | Capital | Stock | Instruments | Net Income | Investment | Interests | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2010 |
$ | 169,602 | $ | 106,962 | $ | 684,551 | $ | (86,840 | ) | $ | | $ | (114,196 | ) | $ | 760,079 | $ | 32,772 | $ | 792,851 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
| | | | | (6,109 | ) | (6,109 | ) | 1,233 | (4,876 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | | | (6,109 | ) | (6,109 | ) | 1,233 | (4,876 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Director stock grants |
82 | 625 | 707 | 707 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grants, net of amounts
withheld for income taxes |
| 244 | (247 | ) | | | | (3 | ) | | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issuance costs |
| | (16 | ) | | | | (16 | ) | | (16 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock options and
restricted stock, net of forfeitures |
| (4 | ) | 1,190 | | | | 1,186 | | 1,186 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | (1,126 | ) | (1,126 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of redeemable
noncontrolling interests |
| | (526 | ) | | | | (526 | ) | | (526 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash preferred dividends paid |
| | | | | (6,454 | ) | (6,454 | ) | | (6,454 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash common dividends paid |
| | | | | (9,316 | ) | (9,316 | ) | | (9,316 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2011 |
$ | 169,602 | $ | 107,284 | $ | 685,577 | $ | (86,840 | ) | $ | | $ | (136,075 | ) | $ | 739,548 | $ | 32,879 | $ | 772,427 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2009 |
$ | 169,602 | $ | 103,352 | $ | 662,216 | $ | (86,840 | ) | $ | (9,517 | ) | $ | (51,402 | ) | $ | 787,411 | $ | 32,848 | $ | 820,259 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
| | | | | (3,714 | ) | (3,714 | ) | 1,140 | (2,574 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| | | | 141 | | 141 | | 141 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | | 141 | (3,714 | ) | (3,573 | ) | 1,140 | (2,433 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock dividend, net of issuance costs |
| 1,686 | 10,284 | | | (12,030 | ) | (60 | ) | | (60 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grants under director stock plan |
| 35 | 215 | | | | 250 | | 250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grants |
| 264 | (264 | ) | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock options and
restricted stock, net of forfeitures |
| | 1,212 | | | | 1,212 | | 1,212 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of redeemable
noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | 1,144 | 1,144 | | 1,144 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | (1,186 | ) | (1,186 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash preferred dividends paid |
| | | | | (6,454 | ) | (6,454 | ) | | (6,454 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash common dividends paid |
| | | | | (6,031 | ) | (6,031 | ) | | (6,031 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2010 |
$ | 169,602 | $ | 105,337 | $ | 673,663 | $ | (86,840 | ) | $ | (9,376 | ) | $ | (78,487 | ) | $ | 773,899 | $ | 32,802 | $ | 806,701 | |||||||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (4,847 | ) | $ | (2,604 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of investment properties, net |
266 | (1,817 | ) | |||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 592 | ||||||
Impairment loss |
3,508 | 586 | ||||||
Losses on abandoned predevelopment projects |
| 1,949 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
26,914 | 28,459 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
1,079 | 911 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,186 | 1,462 | ||||||
Effect of recognizing rental revenues on a straight-line or market basis |
(3,705 | ) | (2,225 | ) | ||||
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures |
(4,808 | ) | (5,314 | ) | ||||
Operating distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures |
4,692 | 4,838 | ||||||
Residential lot, outparcel and multi-family cost of sales, net of closing costs paid |
2,390 | 21,581 | ||||||
Residential lot acquisition and development expenditures |
(563 | ) | (894 | ) | ||||
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Change in other receivables and other assets |
1,114 | (1,647 | ) | |||||
Change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(140 | ) | 3,297 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
27,086 | 49,174 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds from investment property sales |
21,543 | 14,788 | ||||||
Property acquisition and development and tenant asset expenditures |
(14,915 | ) | (12,185 | ) | ||||
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
(9,841 | ) | (3,624 | ) | ||||
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures |
4,696 | 3,685 | ||||||
Payment of debt guarantee of unconsolidated joint venture |
| (17,250 | ) | |||||
Collection of notes receivable |
98 | 88 | ||||||
Change in other assets |
(2,386 | ) | (1,629 | ) | ||||
Change in restricted cash |
882 | (1,359 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
77 | (17,486 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds from credit facility |
52,900 | | ||||||
Repayment of credit facility |
(32,900 | ) | | |||||
Payment of loan issuance costs |
| (1,723 | ) | |||||
Repayment of notes payable |
(28,101 | ) | (9,830 | ) | ||||
Common stock issuance costs |
(16 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||
Cash common dividends paid |
(9,316 | ) | (6,031 | ) | ||||
Cash preferred dividends paid |
(6,454 | ) | (6,454 | ) | ||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
| 1,269 | ||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(6,526 | ) | (1,186 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(30,413 | ) | (24,015 | ) | ||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(3,250 | ) | 7,673 | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
7,599 | 9,464 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 4,349 | $ | 17,137 | ||||
SIGNIFICANT NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS: |
||||||||
Transfer from other assets to investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
$ | 6,050 | $ | | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2011
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2011
(UNAUDITED)
1. | BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein include the accounts of
Cousins Properties Incorporated (Cousins) and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Cousins
Real Estate Corporation and its subsidiaries (CREC). All of the entities included in the
condensed consolidated financial statements are hereinafter referred to collectively as the
Company.
Cousins has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) and intends to,
among other things, distribute 100% of its federal taxable income to stockholders, thereby
eliminating any liability for federal income taxes under current law. Therefore, the results
included herein do not include a federal income tax provision for Cousins. CREC operates as a
taxable REIT subsidiary and is taxed separately from Cousins as a C-Corporation. Accordingly, if
applicable, the Statements of Operations include a provision for, or benefit from, CRECs income
taxes.
The condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and were prepared by the Company
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) for interim financial information and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). In the opinion of management, these financial
statements reflect all adjustments necessary (which adjustments are of a normal and recurring
nature) for the fair presentation of the Companys financial position as of June 30, 2011 and the
results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The results of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of
results expected for the full year. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the SEC. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The accounting
policies employed are substantially the same as those shown in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements included in such Form 10-K.
The Company earns fees and incurs expenses related to the management, development and leasing
of properties owned both by third parties and by joint ventures in which the Company has an
ownership interest. In the first quarter of 2011, the Company began separately stating on the
Statements of Operations the third party management and leasing revenues, including reimbursements,
for Cousins Properties Services (CPS), a wholly-owned subsidiary that performs management and
leasing services for third-party owned office properties. The Company also began separately
stating expenses associated with CPS which were previously recognized in the General and
Administrative and Other expense line items. The amounts remaining in Fee Income on the Statements
of Operations relate to management, leasing and development fees, including reimbursements, earned
by the Company from certain other third party owners and joint ventures. Prior periods have been
revised to conform to this new presentation.
7
Table of Contents
2. | NOTES PAYABLE, INTEREST EXPENSE AND COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
The following table summarizes the terms and amounts of the Companys notes payable
outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Term/ | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
Description | Interest Rate | Period (Years) | Maturity | June 30, 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Terminus 100 mortgage note |
5.25% | 12/30 | 1/1/23 | $ | 139,190 | $ | 140,000 | |||||||||||
The American Cancer Society Center mortgage
note (interest only until October 1, 2011) |
6.45% | 10/30 | 9/1/17 | 136,000 | 136,000 | |||||||||||||
Credit Facility, unsecured (see note) |
LIBOR + 1.75% to 2.25% | 5/N/A | 8/29/12 | 125,400 | 105,400 | |||||||||||||
Meridian Mark Plaza mortgage note |
6.00% | 10/30 | 8/1/20 | 26,725 | 26,892 | |||||||||||||
100/200 North Point Center East mortgage note |
5.39% | 5/30 | 6/1/12 | 24,656 | 24,830 | |||||||||||||
Lakeshore Park Plaza mortgage note (see note) |
5.89% | 4/25 | 8/1/12 | 17,356 | 17,544 | |||||||||||||
The Points at Waterview mortgage note |
5.66% | 10/25 | 1/1/16 | 16,367 | 16,592 | |||||||||||||
600 University Park Place mortgage note |
7.38% | 10/30 | 8/10/11 | 12,163 | 12,292 | |||||||||||||
Callaway Gardens |
4.13% | N/A | 11/18/13 | 177 | 173 | |||||||||||||
333/555 North Point Center East mortgage note (see note) |
7.00% | 10/25 | 11/1/11 | | 26,412 | |||||||||||||
Handy Road Associates, LLC (see note) |
Prime + 1%, but not < 6% | 5/N/A | 3/30/2011 | | 3,374 | |||||||||||||
$ | 498,034 | $ | 509,509 | |||||||||||||||
The Companys Credit Facility bears interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) plus a spread, based on the Companys leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Facility.
At June 30, 2011, the spread over LIBOR under the Credit Facility was 2.0%. The amount that the
Company may draw under the Credit Facility is a defined calculation based on the Companys
unencumbered assets and other factors. Total borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility was
$345.4 million at June 30, 2011. In June 2011, the Company notified the bank of its intention to
exercise a one-year extension option under the Credit Facility, which will change the maturity date
to August 29, 2012.
On June 1, 2011, the Company prepaid, without penalty, the 333/555 North Point Center East
mortgage note. On July 1, 2011, the Company prepaid, without penalty, the Lakeshore Park Plaza
mortgage note.
The Company was released of its obligation under the Handy Road Associates, LLC (Handy Road)
mortgage note through foreclosure in May 2011.
Fair Value
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the estimated fair values of the Companys notes
payable were approximately $509.5 million and $521.8 million, respectively, calculated by
discounting future cash flows at estimated rates at which similar loans could have been obtained at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. This fair value calculation is considered to be a Level 2
calculation under the guidelines as set forth in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures, as the Company utilizes market rates for similar type loans from third party brokers.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
In 2010, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement to manage its interest rate risk
associated with its floating-rate, LIBOR-based borrowings. This swap expired in October 2010.
Also during 2010, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement to manage interest rate risk
under its former Term Facility, which swap was terminated in July 2010. The changes in fair value
of the interest rate swap agreements were recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss on the
Balance Sheets.
Other Debt Information
The real estate and other assets of The American Cancer Society Center (the ACS Center) are
restricted under the ACS Center loan agreement in that they are not available to settle debts of
the Company. However, provided that the ACS Center loan has not incurred any uncured event of
default, as defined in the loan agreement, the cash flows from the ACS Center, after payments of
debt service, operating expenses and reserves, are available for distribution to the Company.
At June 30, 2011, the Company had outstanding letters of credit and performance bonds of $6.1
million. As a lessor, the Company has $15.2 million in future obligations under leases to fund
tenant improvements and other funding commitments as of June 30, 2011. As a lessee, the Company has
future obligations under ground and office leases of approximately $16.4 million at June 30, 2011.
8
Table of Contents
Litigation
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings, claims and administrative proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are expected to be covered by liability
insurance. Management makes assumptions and estimates concerning the likelihood and amount of any
potential loss relating to these matters using the latest information available. The Company
records a liability for litigation if an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. If
an unfavorable outcome is probable and a reasonable estimate of the loss is a range, the Company
accrues the best estimate within the range. If no amount within the range is a better estimate
than any other amount, the Company accrues the minimum amount within the range. If an unfavorable
outcome is probable but the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated, the Company
discloses the nature of the litigation and indicates that an estimate of the loss or range of loss
cannot be made. If an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and the estimated loss is
material, the Company discloses the nature and estimate of the possible loss of the litigation.
The Company does not disclose information with respect to litigation where an unfavorable outcome
is considered to be remote. Based on current expectations, such matters, both individually and in
the aggregate, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, results of
operations, business or financial condition of the Company.
3. | EARNINGS PER SHARE |
Net income (loss) per share-basic is calculated as net income (loss) available to common
stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Net income (loss) per share-diluted is calculated as net income (loss) available to common
stockholders divided by the diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period, including nonvested restricted stock which has nonforfeitable dividend rights. Diluted
weighted average number of common shares is calculated to reflect the potential dilution under the
treasury stock method that would occur if stock options (or other contracts to issue common stock,
if any) were exercised and resulted in additional common shares outstanding. The numerator used in
the Companys per share calculations is reduced for the effect of preferred dividends and is the
same for both basic and diluted net income (loss) per share. Weighted average shares-basic and
diluted for the three and six months ending June 30, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Weighted average shares basic |
103,659 | 101,001 | 103,588 | 100,538 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive potential common shares stock options |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares diluted |
103,659 | 101,001 | 103,588 | 100,538 | ||||||||||||
Stock options are dilutive when the average market price of the Companys stock during
the period exceeds the option exercise price. Also, in periods where the Company is in a net loss
position, the dilutive effect of stock options is not included in the dilutive weighted average shares total.
Anti-dilutive stock options represent stock options which could not have been exercised during
the period because the strike price exceeded the average market value of the Companys stock.
These anti-dilutive stock options are not included in the calculation of dilutive weighted average
shares, but could be dilutive in the future. Total anti-dilutive stock options for each of the
periods are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Anti-dilutive options |
6,024 | 7,174 | 6,152 | 7,185 |
4. | STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
The Company has several types of stock-based compensation stock options, restricted stock
and restricted stock units (RSUs) which are described in Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010. The Company recorded net stock-based compensation expense of approximately $664,000 and
$776,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $1.7 million and $1.8 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
In the first quarter of 2011, the Company granted 211,729 stock options to key employees and
1,019 stock options to a new director. Also during the first quarter of 2011, the Company made
restricted stock grants of 214,206 shares to key employees with a three-year ratable vesting, and
29,411 shares to a key employee which cliff vest in three years.
9
Table of Contents
RSUs are accounted for as liability awards under ASC 718, Stock Compensation, and employees
are paid cash at vesting based upon the closing prices of the Companys stock. In the first
quarter of 2011, the Company awarded 401 RSUs to a new director, which cliff vest in three years.
Also in the first quarter of 2011, the Company awarded two types of performance-based RSUs to key
employees based on the following performance metrics: (1) Total Stockholder Return of the Company,
as defined, as compared to the companies in the SNL Financial US Office REIT index as of January 1,
2011 (TSR SNL RSUs), and (2) ratio of funds from operations per share to targeted cumulative
funds from operations per share amount (FFO RSUs). The performance period for both awards is
January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013, and the targeted number of TSR SNL RSUs and FFO RSUs is
99,970 and 64,266, respectively. The ultimate payout of these awards can range from 0% to 200% of
the targeted number of units depending on the achievement of the performance metrics described
above. Both of these types of RSUs cliff vest on February 15, 2014 and are dependent upon the
attainment of required service and performance criteria. The number of RSUs vesting will be
determined at that date, and the payout per unit will be equal to the average closing price on each
trading day during the 30-day period ending on December 31, 2013. The Company expenses an estimate
of the fair value of the TSR SNL RSUs over the vesting period using a quarterly Monte Carlo
valuation. The Company expenses the FFO RSUs over the vesting period using the fair market value
of the Companys stock at the reporting date multiplied by the anticipated number of units to be
paid based on the current estimate of what the ratio is expected to be upon vesting. Dividend
equivalents on the RSUs will also be paid based upon the percentage vested. The dividend
equivalent payments will equal the total cash dividends that would have been paid during the
performance period, and as if the cash dividends had been reinvested in Company stock.
5. | INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES |
The Company describes its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in Note 4 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010. The following table summarizes balance sheet data of the Companys unconsolidated joint
ventures as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands). The investments in joint
ventures which have negative balances are included in the Deposits and Deferred Income line item on
the Balance Sheets.
Total Assets | Total Debt | Total Equity | Companys Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL POSITION: | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CP Venture IV LLC entities |
$ | 308,009 | $ | 313,603 | $ | 36,329 | $ | 36,620 | $ | 261,228 | $ | 267,085 | $ | 15,013 | $ | 15,364 | ||||||||||||||||
Charlotte Gateway Village, LLC |
151,843 | 154,200 | 90,175 | 97,030 | 58,507 | 54,834 | 10,350 | 10,366 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CF Murfreesboro Associates |
127,195 | 129,738 | 100,724 | 103,378 | 24,441 | 24,263 | 14,316 | 14,246 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Palisades West LLC |
125,907 | 129,378 | | | 80,680 | 80,767 | 42,178 | 42,256 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CP Venture LLC entities |
102,269 | 106,066 | | | 100,704 | 104,067 | 3,427 | 3,779 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CL Realty, L.L.C. |
82,838 | 86,657 | 1,727 | 2,663 | 79,312 | 82,534 | 38,193 | 39,928 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSREF/Terminus 200 LLC |
69,803 | 65,164 | 50,861 | 46,169 | 13,347 | 13,956 | 2,670 | 2,791 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Temco Associates, LLC |
60,231 | 60,608 | 2,859 | 2,929 | 56,961 | 57,475 | 22,462 | 22,713 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cousins Watkins LLC |
56,987 | 57,184 | 28,725 | 28,850 | 27,683 | 28,334 | 15,706 | 14,850 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crawford Long CPI, LLC |
33,433 | 34,408 | 48,174 | 48,701 | (16,323 | ) | (15,341 | ) | (6,937 | ) | (6,431 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Wildwood Associates |
21,208 | 21,220 | | | 21,131 | 21,216 | (1,685 | ) | (1,642 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ten Peachtree Place Associates |
20,473 | 20,980 | 26,491 | 26,782 | (7,054 | ) | (6,263 | ) | (4,762 | ) | (4,581 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
EP I LLC |
16,815 | | 1 | | 15,009 | | 14,091 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TRG Columbus Development Venture, Ltd. |
3,116 | 3,574 | | | 1,872 | 2,115 | 8 | 58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pine Mountain Builders, LLC |
523 | 1,559 | | 896 | 360 | 403 | 735 | 757 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,180,650 | $ | 1,184,339 | $ | 386,066 | $ | 394,018 | $ | 717,858 | $ | 715,445 | $ | 165,765 | $ | 154,454 | |||||||||||||||||
10
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes statement of operations information of the Companys
unconsolidated joint ventures for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
Companys Share of Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Revenues | Net Income (Loss) | Income (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS: | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
CP Venture IV LLC entities |
$ | 15,430 | $ | 15,579 | $ | 1,890 | $ | 1,826 | $ | 539 | $ | 491 | ||||||||||||
Charlotte Gateway Village, LLC |
16,308 | 15,933 | 4,282 | 3,808 | 588 | 588 | ||||||||||||||||||
CF Murfreesboro Associates |
6,622 | 7,182 | 178 | 1,001 | (41 | ) | 401 | |||||||||||||||||
Palisades West LLC |
8,114 | 6,730 | 2,911 | 2,282 | 1,422 | 1,107 | ||||||||||||||||||
CP Venture LLC entities |
9,506 | 9,254 | 3,830 | 4,301 | 396 | 445 | ||||||||||||||||||
CL Realty, L.L.C. |
3,144 | 4,212 | 1,390 | 1,219 | 545 | 1,125 | ||||||||||||||||||
MSREF/Terminus 200 LLC |
2,197 | 245 | (2,173 | ) | (480 | ) | (434 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Temco Associates, LLC |
318 | 1,877 | (416 | ) | 813 | (202 | ) | 406 | ||||||||||||||||
Cousins Watkins LLC |
2,422 | | 17 | | 1,188 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Crawford Long CPI, LLC |
5,955 | 5,688 | 1,217 | 834 | 608 | 416 | ||||||||||||||||||
Wildwood Associates |
| | (85 | ) | (41 | ) | (43 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Ten Peachtree Place Associates |
3,611 | 3,847 | 407 | 481 | 212 | 248 | ||||||||||||||||||
EP I LLC |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
TRG Columbus Development Venture, Ltd. |
19 | 1,071 | 7 | 392 | 50 | 162 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pine Mountain Builders, LLC |
2,632 | 1,185 | (44 | ) | 91 | (22 | ) | 46 | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 533 | | 55 | 2 | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 76,278 | $ | 73,336 | $ | 13,411 | $ | 16,582 | $ | 4,808 | $ | 5,314 | |||||||||||||
On June 28, 2011, EP I LLC (EP I) was formed between the Company, with a 75% ownership
interest, and Lion Gables Realty Limited Partnership (Gables), with a 25% ownership interest, for
the purpose of developing and operating Emory Point, a mixed-used property in Atlanta, Georgia.
Profits and losses are allocated to the partners based on their percentage ownership interests,
with no preferences or promotes. Upon formation, the Company contributed approximately $8.1
million in cash and $3.1 million in predevelopment assets, and Gables contributed a total of
approximately $3.8 million in cash and other assets. The Companys investment in EP I includes
other previously capitalized assets related to the venture, for a total investment balance of $14.1
million upon formation. The Company anticipates it will make approximately $19.6 million in
additional cash contributions to the venture for project development. Upon formation, EP I also
entered into a construction loan agreement, secured by the project, to provide for up to $61.1
million to fund construction. The venture may select from two interest rate options, as defined in
the loan agreement, which are based on floating-rate indices plus a spread. The loan matures June
28, 2014 and may be extended for two, one-year periods if certain conditions are met. The Company
and Gables will guarantee up to approximately $11.5 million and $3.8 million of the construction
loan, respectively.
6. | OTHER ASSETS |
Other Assets on the Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 included the
following (in thousands):
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Investment in Verde Realty |
$ | 5,868 | $ | 9,376 | ||||
FF&E and leasehold improvements, net of accumulated depreciation
of $17,084 and $16,117 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
5,056 | 4,673 | ||||||
Predevelopment costs and earnest money |
1,759 | 7,039 | ||||||
Lease inducements, net of accumulated amortization
of $3,540 and $2,991 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
11,531 | 11,899 | ||||||
Loan closing costs, net of accumulated amortization
of $4,188 and $3,109 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
1,625 | 2,703 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
3,448 | 2,296 | ||||||
Intangible Assets: |
||||||||
Goodwill |
5,430 | 5,430 | ||||||
Above market leases, net of accumulated amortization
of $8,760 and $8,741 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
508 | 526 | ||||||
In-place leases, net of accumulated amortization
of $2,529 and $2,492 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
285 | 322 | ||||||
$ | 35,510 | $ | 44,264 | |||||
11
Table of Contents
Goodwill relates entirely to the Office reportable segment. Investment in Verde Realty
(Verde) relates to a cost method investment in a non-public real estate investment trust. During
the first quarter of 2011, the Company determined that there were impairment indicators related to
its investment in Verde, including Verdes withdrawal of its proposed initial public offering. The
Company estimated the fair value of Verde by calculating discounted future cash flows using Level 3
inputs, such as market capitalization rates, discount rates and other items. The fair value
estimate was less than carrying value, and the Company determined the impairment was
other-than-temporary in accordance with accounting standards for investments in unconsolidated
entities. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $3.5 million.
7. | NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
The Company consolidates various ventures that are involved in the ownership and/or
development of real estate. The partners share of the entity, in cases where the entitys
documents do not contain a required redemption clause, is reflected in a separate line item called
Nonredeemable Noncontrolling Interests shown within Equity on the Balance Sheets. Correspondingly,
the partners share of income or loss is recorded in Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling
Interests in the Statements of Operations.
Other consolidated ventures contain provisions requiring the Company to purchase the partners
share of the venture at a certain value upon demand or at a future prescribed date. In these
situations, the partners share of the entity is recognized as Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
and is presented between liabilities and equity on the Balance Sheets, with the corresponding share
of income or loss in the venture recorded in Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests in
the Statements of Operations. The redemption values are evaluated each period and adjusted to the
higher of fair value or the partners cost basis within the equity section of the Balance Sheet.
The Company recognizes these changes in the estimated redemption value as they occur. The
following table details the components of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in consolidated
subsidiaries for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Beginning Balance Redeemable |
$ | 14,289 | $ | 12,591 | ||||
Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
29 | (30 | ) | |||||
Contributions from (distributions to) noncontrolling interests |
(5,400 | ) | 1,269 | |||||
Change in fair value of noncontrolling interests |
526 | (1,144 | ) | |||||
Ending Balance Redeemable |
$ | 9,444 | $ | 12,686 | ||||
The following reconciles the net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
as shown in the Statements of Equity, which only includes nonredeemable interests, to the net
income attributable to noncontrolling interests as shown in the Statements of Operations, for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income attributable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests |
$ | 1,233 | $ | 1,140 | ||||
Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
29 | (30 | ) | |||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
$ | 1,262 | $ | 1,110 | ||||
8. | REPORTABLE SEGMENTS |
The Company has six reportable segments: Office, Retail, Land, Third-Party Management and
Leasing, For-Sale Multi-Family and Other. These reportable segments represent an aggregation of
operating segments reported to the Chief Operating Decision Maker based on similar economic
characteristics that include the type of product and nature of service. Each segment includes both
consolidated operations and joint ventures. The Office and Retail segments show the results by
each product type. Net operating income is calculated as rental
property revenues less rental property operating expenses. The Land segment includes results
of operations for various tracts of land that are held for investment or future development, and
single-family residential communities that are parceled into lots and sold to various homebuilders
or sold as undeveloped tracts of land. The Third Party Management and Leasing segment includes fee
income and related expenses for the third party owned properties managed or leased by the Companys
CPS subsidiary. The For-Sale Multi-Family segment includes results of operations for the
development and sale of multi-family real estate projects.
12
Table of Contents
The Other segment includes:
| fee income for third party properties, other than those managed by CPS, and joint
venture properties for which the Company performs management, development and leasing
services (fee income related to residential joint ventures is included in the Land segment); |
| compensation for corporate employees, other than those in the CPS Third Party
Management and Leasing segment; |
| general corporate overhead costs, interest expense for consolidated entities (as
financing decisions are made at the corporate level, with the exception of joint venture
interest expense, which is included in joint venture results in the respective segment); |
| income attributable to noncontrolling interests; |
| income taxes; |
| depreciation; |
| preferred dividends; and |
| operations of the Industrial properties, which are not material for separate
presentation. |
Company management evaluates the performance of its reportable segments in part based on funds
from operations available to common stockholders (FFO). FFO is a supplemental operating
performance measure used in the real estate industry. The Company calculated FFO using the
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) definition of FFO, which is net
income (loss) available to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding
extraordinary items, cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and gains or losses from
sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures to reflect FFO on the same basis.
FFO is used by industry analysts, investors and the Company as a supplemental measure of an
equity REITs operating performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly
assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate
values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors
and analysts have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use
historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a
supplemental measure of a REITs operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation,
among other items, from GAAP net income. Management believes the use of FFO, combined with the
required primary GAAP presentations, has been fundamentally beneficial, improving the understanding
of operating results of REITs among the investing public and making comparisons of REIT operating
results more meaningful. Company management evaluates operating performance in part based on FFO.
Additionally, the Company uses FFO, along with other measures, to assess performance in connection
with evaluating and granting incentive compensation to its officers and other key employees.
Segment net income, investment in joint ventures and capital expenditures are not presented in
the following tables. Management does not utilize these measures when analyzing its segments or
when making resource allocation decisions, and therefore this information is not provided. FFO is
reconciled to net income (loss) on a total Company basis (in thousands).
13
Table of Contents
Third Party | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management | For-Sale | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | Office | Retail | Land | and Leasing | Multi-Family | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income, including discontinued operations |
$ | 15,458 | $ | 4,847 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 911 | $ | 21,216 | ||||||||||||||
Fee income, net of reimbursed expenses |
| | 56 | 2,396 | | 2,008 | 4,460 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential lot, outparcel and multi-family unit sales, net of cost of sales |
| | 4 | | 20 | | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
447 | 10 | | | | 187 | 644 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing expenses |
| | | (1,871 | ) | | | (1,871 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
| | | | | (6,133 | ) | (6,133 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | | (7,358 | ) | (7,358 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of non-real estate assets |
| | | | | (372 | ) | (372 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Separation expenses |
| | | | | (77 | ) | (77 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | | (672 | ) | (672 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations from unconsolidated joint ventures |
2,685 | 2,125 | 127 | | 33 | | 4,970 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | (681 | ) | (681 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Benefit for income taxes from operations |
| | | | | (27 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | (3,227 | ) | (3,227 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations available to common stockholders |
$ | 18,590 | $ | 6,982 | $ | 187 | $ | 525 | $ | 53 | $ | (15,441 | ) | 10,896 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including Companys
share of joint ventures |
(15,661 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of depreciated investment properties |
59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (4,706 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third Party | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management | For-Sale | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 | Office | Retail | Land | and Leasing | Multi-Family | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income, including discontinued operations |
$ | 14,992 | $ | 6,735 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 615 | $ | 22,342 | ||||||||||||||
Fee income, net of reimbursed expenses |
| | 126 | 2,097 | | 2,204 | 4,427 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential lot, multi-family unit, tract and outparcel sales, net of cost
of sales, including gain on sale of undepreciated investment properties |
| (8 | ) | 175 | | 1,835 | 876 | 2,878 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
| 33 | | | | 157 | 190 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing expenses |
| | | (1,826 | ) | | | (1,826 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
| | | | | (6,763 | ) | (6,763 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | | (10,286 | ) | (10,286 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
| | | | (586 | ) | | (586 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of non-real estate assets |
| | | | | (463 | ) | (463 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Separation expenses |
| | | | | (33 | ) | (33 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | | (3,002 | ) | (3,002 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations from unconsolidated joint ventures |
2,426 | 1,644 | 727 | | 45 | | 4,842 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | (584 | ) | (584 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes from operations |
| | | | | (14 | ) | (14 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | (3,227 | ) | (3,227 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations available to common stockholders |
$ | 17,418 | $ | 8,404 | $ | 1,028 | $ | 271 | $ | 1,294 | $ | (20,520 | ) | 7,895 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including Companys
share of joint ventures |
(16,549 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of depreciated investment properties |
59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (8,595 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14
Table of Contents
Third Party | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management | For-Sale | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 | Office | Retail | Land | and Leasing | Multi-Family | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income, including discontinued operations |
$ | 30,709 | $ | 10,582 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,961 | $ | 43,252 | ||||||||||||||
Fee income, net of reimbursed expenses |
| | 91 | 4,236 | | 3,846 | 8,173 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential lot, outparcel and multi-family unit sales, net of cost of sales |
| 50 | 50 | | 2,177 | | 2,277 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
818 | 34 | | | | 305 | 1,157 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing expenses |
| | | (3,716 | ) | | | (3,716 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
| | | | | (13,533 | ) | (13,533 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | | (14,902 | ) | (14,902 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
| | | | | (3,508 | ) | (3,508 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of non-real estate assets |
| | | | | (935 | ) | (935 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Separation expenses |
| | | | | (178 | ) | (178 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | | (1,534 | ) | (1,534 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations from unconsolidated joint ventures |
5,449 | 4,366 | 279 | | 50 | | 10,144 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | (1,262 | ) | (1,262 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Benefit for income taxes from operations |
| | | | | 37 | 37 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | (6,454 | ) | (6,454 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations available to common stockholders |
$ | 36,976 | $ | 15,032 | $ | 420 | $ | 520 | $ | 2,227 | $ | (36,157 | ) | 19,018 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including Companys
share of joint ventures |
(31,315 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of depreciated investment properties, net |
(266 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (12,563 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third Party | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management | For-Sale | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | Office | Retail | Land | and Leasing | Multi-Family | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income, including discontinued operations |
$ | 29,710 | $ | 13,513 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,148 | $ | 44,371 | ||||||||||||||
Fee income, net of reimbursed expenses |
| | 294 | 4,332 | | 3,721 | 8,347 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential lot, multi-family unit, tract and outparcel sales, net of cost
of sales, including gain on sale of undepreciated investment properties |
| 4,585 | 674 | | 4,011 | 1,204 | 10,474 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
| 41 | | | | 273 | 314 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | | | | (592 | ) | (592 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing expenses |
| | | (4,225 | ) | | | (4,225 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
| | | | | (14,780 | ) | (14,780 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | | (20,067 | ) | (20,067 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
| | | | (586 | ) | | (586 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of non-real estate assets |
| | | | | (1,034 | ) | (1,034 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Separation expenses |
| | | | | (101 | ) | (101 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | | (3,864 | ) | (3,864 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations from unconsolidated joint ventures |
4,842 | 3,447 | 1,599 | | 162 | | 10,050 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | (1,110 | ) | (1,110 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Benefit for income taxes from operations |
| | | | | 1,132 | 1,132 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | (6,454 | ) | (6,454 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations available to common stockholders |
$ | 34,552 | $ | 21,586 | $ | 2,567 | $ | 107 | $ | 3,587 | $ | (40,524 | ) | 21,875 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including Companys
share of joint ventures |
(32,161 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of depreciated investment properties |
118 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (10,168 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
When reviewing the results of operations for the Company, management analyzes the
following revenue and income items net of their related costs:
| Rental property operations, including discontinued; |
||
| Reimbursements of third-party and joint venture personnel costs; |
||
| Residential, tract and outparcel sales; |
||
| Multi-family unit sales; and |
||
| Gains or losses on sales of investment properties. |
15
Table of Contents
These amounts are shown in the segment tables above in the same net manner as shown to
management. Certain adjustments are required to reconcile the above segment information to the
Companys consolidated revenues, including removing gains on sales of investment properties from
revenues, as they are not presented within revenues in the Statements of Operations. The following
table reconciles information presented in the tables above to the Companys consolidated revenues
(in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net operating income |
$ | 21,216 | $ | 22,342 | $ | 43,252 | $ | 44,371 | ||||||||
Plus rental property operating expenses |
15,472 | 15,246 | 29,720 | 29,777 | ||||||||||||
Fee income |
2,064 | 2,330 | 3,937 | 4,015 | ||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing revenues |
2,396 | 2,097 | 4,236 | 4,332 | ||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing expense reimbursements |
2,209 | 2,388 | 4,457 | 4,947 | ||||||||||||
Reimbursed expenses |
1,371 | 1,398 | 2,883 | 3,257 | ||||||||||||
Residential lot, outparcel, and multi-family unit sales, net of cost of sales, including
gain on sale of undepreciated investment properties |
24 | 2,878 | 2,277 | 10,474 | ||||||||||||
Less gain on sale of undepreciated investment properties not included in revenues |
| (1,002 | ) | | (1,699 | ) | ||||||||||
Plus residential lot, outparcel, multi-family unit and outparcel cost of sales |
63 | 6,383 | 2,632 | 23,449 | ||||||||||||
Net operating income from discontinued operations not included in revenues |
48 | (1,619 | ) | (88 | ) | (3,406 | ) | |||||||||
Other income |
644 | 190 | 1,157 | 314 | ||||||||||||
Other income discontinued operations |
(88 | ) | (19 | ) | (88 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Total consolidated revenues |
$ | 45,419 | $ | 52,612 | $ | 94,375 | $ | 119,812 | ||||||||
9. | PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS |
In February 2011, the Company sold Jefferson Mill Business Park Building A, a 459,000 square
foot industrial property in suburban Atlanta, Georgia. The sales price was $22.0 million, and a
loss of approximately $384,000 was recognized on the sale. In July 2010, the Company sold San Jose
MarketCenter, a 213,000 square foot retail center in San Jose, California, and recognized a gain of
$6.6 million. Also, in October 2010, the Company sold 8995 Westside Parkway, a 51,000 square foot
office building in suburban Atlanta, Georgia, and recognized a gain of $654,000. The combined
results of these properties operations and any gains or losses on sale are included in
Discontinued Operations in the Statements of Operations for all periods presented.
The components of Discontinued Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010 are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Rental property revenues |
$ | (48 | ) | $ | 2,292 | $ | 97 | $ | 4,732 | |||||||
Other income |
88 | 19 | 88 | 19 | ||||||||||||
Rental property operating expenses |
| (673 | ) | (9 | ) | (1,326 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (333 | ) | (64 | ) | (1,052 | ) | |||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | 40 | $ | 1,305 | $ | 112 | $ | 2,373 | ||||||||
Loss on sale of investment properties |
$ | | $ | | $ | (384 | ) | $ | | |||||||
16
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Overview:
Cousins Properties Incorporated (Cousins), a Georgia corporation, is a self-administered and
self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT). Cousins Real Estate Corporation (CREC) is a
taxable entity wholly-owned by and consolidated with Cousins. CREC owns, develops, and manages its
own real estate portfolio and performs certain real estate related services for other parties.
Cousins, CREC and their subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) develop, manage and own
office, retail, industrial and residential real estate projects. As of June 30, 2011, the
Companys portfolio of real estate assets consisted of interests in 7.4 million square feet of
office space, 4.8 million square feet of retail space, 1.5 million square feet of industrial space,
and a mixed use project under development. The Company also had interests in both commercial and
residential land tracts held for investment or future development and single-family lots in
residential projects. The Company also provides leasing and/or management services to
approximately 12.7 million square feet of office and retail space owned by third parties.
During the quarter, the Company leased 225,000 square feet of office space and 199,000 square
feet of retail space in a still-challenged leasing environment. While base rents for office space
have deteriorated only marginally in the recent economic downturn, concessions in the form of free
rent and tenant allowances have increased significantly. In the Atlanta and Dallas markets, rates
and concessions have stabilized, but management does not believe that there will be significant
improvement until employment recovers. The Companys Austin and North Carolina markets, by
contrast, have experienced positive job growth and lease absorption, resulting in a decrease in
lease concessions and an increase in rental rates. With respect to retail leasing, the Company
experienced an increase in the number of leases containing percentage rent and higher allowances
for tenant construction during the downturn. Recently, the Company has seen an improvement in
tenant sales and an uptick in activity by some national retailers. As a result, terms for leases
executed in the current quarter were more traditional in nature as they included standard base rent
clauses and tenant construction allowances more in line with the structure of those seen prior to the downturn,
although at lower rental rates. Management expects this trend to continue as its markets improve and consumer spending increases.
In June 2011, the Company began constructing its first development project since 2007 with the
formation of a joint venture to develop Emory Point, a mixed-use project that is expected to
contain 443 apartment units and 80,000 square feet of retail space at a location adjacent to Emory
University and the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia. The Company is also actively
pursuing other development and acquisition opportunities in the Southeastern United States, one or
more of which could close during 2011.
The Company, mainly through joint ventures in which it has an ownership interest, sold 108
residential lots in the quarter, primarily in its Texas projects. The Texas markets continue to
outperform the Georgia and Florida residential markets and management expects this trend to
continue for the remainder of 2011. Management expects to continue its strategy of selling its
non-strategic land, residential lot and industrial holdings and anticipates selling one or more of
its existing operating assets in 2011 in order to fund its investment activities.
Results of Operations:
Rental Property Revenues. Rental property revenues increased approximately $767,000
(2%) and $2.1 million (3%) in the three and six month 2011 periods compared to the same 2010
periods, respectively, due to:
| Increase of $407,000 and $442,000 in the three and six month periods,
respectively, at the American Cancer Society Center, where average economic occupancy
increased from 84% for the six month 2010 period to 90% for the six month 2011 period; |
| Increase of $348,000 and $947,000 in the three and six month periods,
respectively, at The Avenue Forsyth, where the Company recognized higher revenues as a
result of the elimination of certain co-tenancy contingencies in the 2011 periods; |
| Increase of $340,000 and $795,000 in the three and six month periods,
respectively, at 191 Peachtree Tower, where average economic occupancy increased from
72% for the 2010 six month period to 74% for the six month 2011 period. Rental
property revenues increased further in the six month 2011 period compared to the same
2010 period due to an increase in tenant expense reimbursements of approximately
$221,000; and |
||
| Decrease of $287,000 and $251,000 in the three and six month periods,
respectively, at The Avenue Carriage Crossing, where average economic occupancy
decreased from 90% for the six month 2010 period to 87% for the six month 2011 period. |
17
Table of Contents
Third Party Management and Leasing Revenues and Expenses. Third party management and
leasing revenues represent revenues and expense reimbursements from the Companys wholly-owned
subsidiary, Cousins Properties Services (CPS), which performs management and leasing for certain
third party owned office properties. These revenues increased approximately $120,000 (3%) between
the three month 2011 and 2010 periods, and decreased approximately $586,000 (6%) between the six
month 2011 and 2010 periods. The increase in the three month period is a result of slightly higher
leasing fee income recognized and the decrease in the six month period is a result of lower leasing
fees recognized in the first quarter of 2011 than in the first quarter 2010. Leasing fees
fluctuate based on the rollover activity at individual properties and on the overall supply and
demand for leased office space within individual markets. The related expenses of CPS decreased
approximately $134,000 (3%) and $999,000 (11%) between the three and six month 2011 and 2010
periods, respectively. The decrease in the six month period is primarily the result of the
recognition of bad debt expense of $466,000 in the six month 2010 period related to a management
contract that was prematurely terminated by the customer and to decreases in leasing commission
expense.
Other Income. Other income increased $385,000 and $774,000 between the three and six
month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively, primarily due to an increase in termination fee income
between the periods.
Multi-family Residential Unit Sales and Cost of Sales. Multi-family residential unit
sales and cost of sales decreased significantly between the three and six month 2011 and 2010
periods. These decreases are due to the closing of 22 and 43 condominium units in the three and
six month 2010 periods, respectively, at the 10 Terminus Place and 60 North Market projects. The
Company did not close any condominiums in the three month 2011 period and closed five condominiums
in the six month 2011 period. There are no residential units remaining for sale as of June 30,
2011.
Residential Lot and Outparcel Sales and Cost of Sales.
Residential Lots Residential lot sales and cost of sales decreased between the three
and six month 2011 and 2010 periods. The Company sold one lot in the 2011 three month period
compared to five lots in the comparable 2010 period, and sold two lots in the 2011 six month period
compared to seven lots in the comparable 2010 period.
Outparcels Outparcel sales and cost of sales decreased significantly between the six
month 2011 and 2010 periods because there were no outparcel sales in 2011, compared to eight
outparcel sales in 2010.
General and Administrative Expense (G&A). G&A expense decreased approximately
$630,000 (9%) and $1.2 million (8%) between the three and six month 2011 and 2010 periods,
respectively, primarily as a result of the following:
| Decrease in salaries and benefits of employees of approximately $312,000 and $418,000
between the three and six month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively, primarily due a
decrease in the number of employees at the Company between the periods; |
| Additional decrease in salaries and benefits
of approximately $482,000 and $596,000 between the three and six month 2011
and 2010 periods, respectively, from higher capitalized personnel costs due to an increase in the number of leases executed and an
increase in costs associated with probable development projects during the 2011 period.
The Company capitalizes salaries and benefits of personnel who work on qualified
development projects or on leases that have been executed or are probable of being
executed; |
| Increase of $352,000 and $324,000 between the three and six month periods,
respectively, due to a change in the board of directors compensation program between the
periods; and |
| Decrease of $211,000 and $160,000 in the three and six month periods, respectively,
due to a decrease in professional fees. |
Impairment Loss. During the first quarter 2011 period, the Company recorded an
impairment loss of $3.5 million on its investment in Verde Realty, a cost method investment. In
the second quarter 2010, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $586,000 related to its 60
North Market condominium project.
18
Table of Contents
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased approximately $2.9 million (28%) and
$5.2 million (26%) in the three and six month 2011 periods compared to the same 2010 periods,
respectively. This decrease is partially due to lower average debt outstanding, which was reduced
using proceeds from condominium and operating property sales in 2010 and 2011, of approximately
$85.9 million and $84.2 million in the three and six month 2011 periods, respectively.
Specifically, the Terminus 100 mortgage note was refinanced in 2010 at a lower interest rate and a
$40.0 million reduction in principal. In addition, interest expense decreased as a result of the
termination of two interest rates swaps which had effectively fixed certain variable-rate debt at a
rate higher than the variable rate paid in 2011.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased approximately
$856,000 (6%) and $557,000 (2%) in the three and six month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively,
primarily due to accelerated amortization in 2010 of tenant assets for tenants who terminated their
leases prior to the originally scheduled end date at certain retail properties, with a lower level
of terminations in 2011. Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase in depreciation
expense at several properties due to increased occupancy.
Benefit for Income Taxes from Operations. Benefit for income taxes from operations
decreased approximately $1.1 million between the six month 2011 and 2010 periods, and there was no
significant change in the three month periods. In 2010, the Company recognized a tax benefit for
certain net operating loss carrybacks, with no corresponding benefit in the 2011 period. The
Company is recognizing a valuation allowance against its tax benefits generated from operations at
CREC in the 2010 and 2011 periods. The Company will commence tax benefit recognition if it
determines these benefits are more likely than not to be realized from future operations.
Income from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. Income from unconsolidated joint ventures
decreased approximately $82,000 (3%) and $506,000 (10%) in the three and six month 2011 periods
compared to the same 2010 periods, respectively, due to the following (all amounts discussed
reflect the Companys share of joint venture income based on its ownership interest in each joint
venture):
| Decrease in income from Temco Associates, LLC (Temco) of approximately $608,000 in
the six month 2011 period, primarily due to receipt of additional proceeds in 2010 from a
property sold in a prior year, offset by an increase in lot sales from one lot sold in the
2010 period to five lots sold in the 2011 period. There were no significant changes in
income from Temco between the three month 2011 and 2010 periods; |
| Decrease of $656,000 and $580,000 at CL Realty, L.L.C. between the three and six
month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively. The decrease in the three and six month
periods is a result of a $250,000 impairment charge recognized in the 2011 period, a
decrease in oil and gas revenues and a decrease in lot sales; |
| Decrease in income of approximately $170,000 and $442,000 between the three and six
month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively, from CF Murfreesboro Associates, mainly due to
the amendment of this ventures construction facility in 2010 at a higher interest rate;
and |
| Increase in income of approximately $594,000 and $1.2 million in the three and six
month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively, from Cousins Watkins LLC, as this joint venture
was formed at the end of 2010. |
Gain on Sale of Investment Properties. Gain on sale of investment properties
(excluding discontinued operations) decreased $1.0 million and $1.7 million between the three and
six month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively. The Company sold Glenmore Garden Villas, a townhome
project in Charlotte, North Carolina, and three land tracts in the 2010 periods. There were no
investment property sales, other than those which qualify as discontinued operations, in the 2011
periods.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations. In February 2011, the Company sold
Jefferson Mill Business Park Building A, a 459,000 square foot industrial property in suburban
Atlanta, Georgia, for a sales price of $22.0 million and a capitalization rate of approximately 7%.
In 2010, the Company sold San Jose MarketCenter, a 213,000 square foot retail center in San Jose,
California for a sales price of $85.0 million and a capitalization rate of approximately 8%, and
sold 8995 Westside Parkway, a 51,000 square foot office building in suburban Atlanta, Georgia for
$3.2 million. The capitalization rate of 8995 Westside Parkway was not a significant determinant
of the sales price because this building was unleased at the time of sale. Capitalization rates
are generally calculated by dividing annualized revenues less
expenses by the sales price. If the revenues in place at the date of the sale are not indicative of the future revenues
expected by the buyer and seller, projected annualized revenues are utilized in the calculation.
19
Table of Contents
Funds From Operations. The table below shows Funds from Operations Available to Common
Stockholders (FFO) and the related reconciliation to net income (loss) available to common
stockholders for the Company. The Company calculated FFO in accordance with the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) definition, which is net income available
to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding extraordinary items,
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and gains or losses from sales of depreciable
property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures to reflect FFO on the same basis.
FFO is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental measure of an equity REITs
operating performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that
the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead
have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have
considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost
accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of
REIT operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation, among other items, from GAAP
net income. The use of FFO, combined with the required primary GAAP presentations, has been
fundamentally beneficial, improving the understanding of operating results of REITs among the
investing public and making comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful. Company
management evaluates operating performance in part based on FFO. Additionally, the Company uses
FFO, along with other measures, to assess performance in connection with evaluating and granting
incentive compensation to its officers and other key employees. The reconciliation of net income
(loss) available to common stockholders to FFO is as follows for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands, except per share information):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net Loss Available to Common Stockholders |
$ | (4,706 | ) | $ | (8,595 | ) | $ | (12,563 | ) | $ | (10,168 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Consolidated properties |
13,375 | 14,231 | 26,850 | 27,407 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued properties |
| 333 | 64 | 1,052 | ||||||||||||
Share of unconsolidated joint ventures |
2,663 | 2,453 | 5,346 | 4,747 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation of furniture, fixtures and equipment: |
||||||||||||||||
Consolidated properties |
(372 | ) | (462 | ) | (935 | ) | (1,029 | ) | ||||||||
Discontinued properties |
| (1 | ) | | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Share of unconsolidated joint ventures |
(5 | ) | (5 | ) | (10 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of investment properties: |
||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
(59 | ) | (1,061 | ) | (118 | ) | (1,817 | ) | ||||||||
Discontinued properties |
| | 384 | | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of undepreciated investment properties |
| 1,002 | | 1,699 | ||||||||||||
Funds From Operations Available to Common Stockholders |
$ | 10,896 | $ | 7,895 | $ | 19,018 | $ | 21,875 | ||||||||
Per Common Share Basic and Diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Net Loss Available |
$ | (.05 | ) | $ | (.09 | ) | $ | (.12 | ) | $ | (.10 | ) | ||||
Funds From Operations |
$ | .11 | $ | .08 | $ | .18 | $ | .22 | ||||||||
Weighted Average Shares Basic |
103,659 | 101,001 | 103,588 | 100,538 | ||||||||||||
Weighted
Average Shares Diluted |
103,684 | 101,001 | 103,606 | 100,538 | ||||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources:
The Companys primary liquidity sources are:
| Cash from operations; |
||
| Borrowings under its Credit Facility; |
||
| Mortgage notes payable; |
||
| Proceeds from equity offerings; |
||
| Joint venture formations; and |
||
| Sales of assets. |
The Companys primary liquidity uses are:
| Corporate expenses; |
||
| Expenditures on predevelopment and development projects; |
||
| Payments of tenant improvements and other leasing costs; |
||
| Principal and interest payments on debt obligations; |
||
| Dividends to common and preferred stockholders; and |
||
| Property investments. |
Financial Condition
During 2010 and 2011, the Company improved its financial position by reducing leverage,
extending maturities, replacing higher cost mortgage notes with lower cost financing and modifying
credit agreements, all of which increased overall financial flexibility. The Company has
relatively low debt maturities for the remainder of 2011. The Company expects to fund its debt
maturities and other commitments over the next 12 months with borrowings under its Credit Facility,
borrowings under new or renewed mortgage loans and proceeds from the sale of assets. The Company
may also seek additional capital to fund its activities, which could include joint venture equity
from third parties and/or the issuance of common or preferred equity.
If opportunities arise, the Company may acquire operating, development or redevelopment
projects in the second half of 2011, or make other investments. The Company currently has
commitments under existing leases to fund a certain level of tenant assets and anticipates
additional tenant costs in 2011 based on lease-up expectations, which would increase the use of
cash.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
At June 30, 2011, the Company was subject to the following contractual obligations and
commitments (in thousands):
Less than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | 5 years | ||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Company debt: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unsecured Credit Facility (1) |
$ | 125,400 | $ | | $ | 125,400 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Mortgage notes payable |
372,634 | 40,698 | 26,744 | (2) | 24,041 | 281,151 | ||||||||||||||
Interest commitments (3) |
152,637 | 23,328 | 36,855 | 35,092 | 57,362 | |||||||||||||||
Ground leases |
14,920 | 100 | 208 | 219 | 14,393 | |||||||||||||||
Other operating leases |
1,520 | 653 | 626 | 187 | 54 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 667,111 | $ | 64,779 | $ | 189,833 | $ | 59,539 | $ | 352,960 | ||||||||||
Commitments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Letters of credit |
$ | 4,129 | $ | 4,129 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Performance bonds |
1,943 | 1,943 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Unfunded tenant improvements and other |
15,191 | 15,191 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total commitments |
$ | 21,263 | $ | 21,263 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
(1) | The Company has notified the bank of its intention to exercise a one-year extension option,
which will change the maturity to August 29, 2012.
Maturity is shown in the table above reflecting the one-year extension. |
|
(2) | The Lakeshore Park Plaza mortage note is due on August 1, 2012, but was prepaid without penalty
on July 1, 2011. It is shown in the table above based on the contractual maturity. |
|
(3) | Interest on variable rate obligations is based on rates effective as of June 30, 2011. |
21
Table of Contents
In addition, the Company has several standing or renewable service contracts mainly related to
the operation of buildings. These contracts are in the ordinary course of business and are
generally one year or less. These contracts are not included in the above table and are usually
reimbursed in whole or in part by tenants.
Other Debt Information
The real estate and other assets of The American Cancer Society Center (the ACS Center) are
restricted under the ACS Center loan agreement in that they are not available to settle debts of
the Company. However, provided that the ACS Center loan has not incurred any uncured event of
default, as defined in the loan agreement, the cash flows from the ACS Center, after payments of
debt service, operating expenses and reserves, are available for distribution to the Company.
The Companys Credit Facility bears interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
plus a spread, based on the Companys leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Facility. At June
30, 2011, the spread over LIBOR under the Credit Facility was 2.0%. The amount that the Company
may draw under the Credit Facility is a defined calculation based on the Companys unencumbered
assets and other factors. Total borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility was $345.4 million at
June 30, 2011. In June 2011, the Company notified the bank of its intention to exercise a one-year
extension option under the Credit Facility, which will change the maturity date to August 29, 2012.
On June 28, 2011, EP I LLC (EP I) was formed between the Company, with a 75% ownership
interest, and Lion Gables Realty Limited Partnership (Gables), with a 25% ownership interest, for
the purpose of developing and operating Emory Point, a mixed-used property in Atlanta, Georgia.
Upon formation, EP I entered into a construction loan agreement, secured by the project, to provide
for up to $61.1 million to fund construction. The venture may select from two interest rate
options, as defined in the loan agreement, which are based on floating-rate indices plus a spread.
The loan matures June 28, 2014 and may be extended for two, one-year periods if certain conditions
are met. The Company and Gables will guarantee up to approximately $11.5 million and $3.8 million
of the construction loan, respectively.
On June 1, 2011, the Company prepaid, without penalty, the 333/555 North Point Center East
mortgage note. On July 1, 2011, the Company prepaid, without penalty, the Lakeshore Park Plaza
mortgage note. The 600 University Park Plaza mortgage note matures August 10, 2011, and the
Company expects to repay this note in full at maturity.
The Company was released of its obligation under the Handy Road Associates, LLC (Handy Road)
mortgage note through foreclosure in May 2011.
Future Capital Requirements
The Companys mortgage debt is primarily non-recourse, fixed-rate mortgage notes secured by
various real estate assets. Some of the Companys non-recourse mortgages contain covenants which,
if not satisfied, could result in acceleration of the maturity of the debt. The Company generally
expects that it will either refinance the non-recourse mortgages at maturity or repay the mortgages
with proceeds from other financings. As of June 30, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on
the Companys consolidated debt was 4.94%, and the Companys consolidated debt to total market
capitalization ratio was 32.1%.
The Company expects sales of assets and amounts available under the Credit Facility to be the
primary funding sources for current contractual obligations and commitments. The Company may also
fund its commitments by obtaining long-term mortgage debt on some of its unencumbered assets, to
the extent available and with acceptable terms, or by forming new joint ventures.
The Company may generate capital through the issuance of securities that include common or
preferred stock, warrants, debt securities or depositary shares. The Company has an active shelf
registration statement which allows for the issuance of up to $500 million of such securities, of
which $482 million remains to be drawn as of June 30, 2011. Management will continue to evaluate
all public equity sources and select the most appropriate options as capital is required.
The Company may raise or recycle capital to meet obligations. If one or more sources of
capital are not available when required, the Company may be forced to reduce the number of projects
it acquires or develops and/or raise capital on potentially unfavorable terms, or may be unable to
raise capital, which could have an adverse effect on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
22
Table of Contents
Cash Flows
The reasons for significant increases and decreases in cash flows between the periods are as
follows:
Cash Flows from Operating Activities. Cash flows from operating activities decreased
approximately $22.1 million between the six month 2011 period and the corresponding 2010 period due
to the following:
| Cash inflows decreased $12.5 million from multi-family unit sales, due to a decrease in
the number of units sold at both the Companys 10 Terminus and 60 North Market condominium
projects. There are no multi-family units for sale as of June 30, 2011; |
| Cash inflows decreased $12.4 million in net proceeds from outparcel sales. There were
no outparcel sales in 2011, compared to eight outparcel sales in 2010; |
| Cash outflows increased $4.7 million for incentive compensation awards. In 2011, $4.7
million of cash incentive compensation awards were paid compared to none in 2010; and |
| Cash outflows decreased $5.4 million due to a reduction in interest paid due to lower
average borrowings outstanding in 2011, the termination of two interest rate swaps in late
2010, and the refinancing of the Terminus 100 mortgage note. |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities decreased
approximately $17.6 million between the six month 2011 period and the corresponding 2010 period,
due to the following:
| Increase in proceeds from the sale of investment properties of $6.8 million. The
Company sold Jefferson Mill in 2011 for net proceeds of approximately $21.5 million. In
2010, the Company sold Glenmore Garden Villas and three tracts of land for net proceeds of
approximately $14.7 million; |
| Decrease in cash used of $17.3 million due to the payment of a debt guarantee in 2010
related to the old Terminus 200 joint venture; and |
| Increase of $6.2 million in contributions to joint ventures, mainly related to $8.1
million contributed for the formation of the EP I joint venture in the second quarter of
2011. In the 2010 period, the Company contributed $2.7 million for the formation of the
MSREF/Terminus 200 LLC joint venture. |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities increased
approximately $6.4 million between the six month 2011 period and the corresponding 2010 period, due
to the following:
| Repayments of notes payable increased $18.3 million between 2011 and 2010. In 2011,
the Company prepaid the 333/555 North Point Center East mortgage note for $26.4 million,
and, in 2010, the Company repaid the $8.7 million Glenmore Garden Villas note in
conjunction with its sale; |
| Cash common dividends increased $3.3 million in 2011 compared to 2010. The 2011
quarterly dividends were $0.045 per share paid all in cash. The 2010 quarterly dividends
were $0.09 per share paid in a combination of cash and stock; |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests increased $5.3 million between 2010 and 2011.
The Company distributed approximately $5.1 million to the partner in Jefferson Mill for
its share of sale proceeds; and |
| Higher net proceeds of $20.0 million from the Credit Facility in 2011 compared to 2010,
partially offsetting the increase in cash used in financing activities. |
Capital Expenditures. The Company incurs costs related to its real estate assets that include
acquisition of undeveloped land, development and construction, redevelopment of existing
properties, leasing costs for tenants, and ongoing property repairs and maintenance. In addition,
the Company may purchase existing operating properties.
23
Table of Contents
Capital expenditures for certain types of real estate are categorized as operating activities
in the Statements of Cash Flows, such as those for the development of residential lots, retail
outparcels and for-sale multi-family residential projects. During the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, the Company incurred $563,000 and $894,000, respectively, in residential project
expenditures. The Company does not anticipate entering into any new residential or for-sale,
multi-family projects in the near term, and upcoming expenditures are anticipated to be used to
complete current projects in inventory.
Capital expenditures for other types of real estate, mainly office and retail assets the
Company intends to hold and operate, are included in property acquisition and development and
tenant asset expenditures as an investing activity in the Statements of Cash Flows. Amounts
accrued are removed from the table below to show the components of these costs on a cash basis.
These costs for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Redevelopment property building improvements |
$ | 3,870 | $ | 1,334 | ||||
Redevelopment property tenant improvements and leasing costs |
2,338 | 4,146 | ||||||
Operating properties building improvements |
112 | 159 | ||||||
Operating properties tenant improvements and leasing costs |
10,273 | 10,166 | ||||||
Capitalized personnel costs |
610 | 396 | ||||||
Accrual to cash adjustment |
(2,288 | ) | (4,016 | ) | ||||
Total property acquisition and development expenditures |
$ | 14,915 | $ | 12,185 | ||||
Capital expenditures increased in 2011 mainly due to building improvements at the
Companys redevelopment property and to increased tenant improvements and leasing costs at its
operating properties. Tenant improvements and leasing costs as well as capitalized personnel costs
are a function of the number and size of newly executed leases or renewals of existing leases. The
amount of tenant improvement and leasing costs on a per square foot basis varies by lease and by
market. As discussed in the Overview section above, tenant improvement and leasing costs per
square foot have increased during the period of economic downturn, but amounts have stabilized
overall and are decreasing in some of the Companys markets. Given the level of expected leasing
and renewal activity, in future periods, management expects tenant improvements and leasing costs
to remain consistent with or greater than that experienced in the six months of 2011.
Dividends. The Company paid cash common and preferred dividends of $15.8 million and $12.5
million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which it funded with cash
provided by operating activities. The 2011 common stock dividends were paid all in cash, and the
2010 common stock dividends were paid in a combination of cash and common stock. The total value
of the common dividends paid in the 2010 period totaled $18.1 million. The Company currently
intends to pay future dividends in cash, and expects to fund its quarterly distributions to common
and preferred stockholders with cash provided by operating activities, proceeds from investment
property sales, distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures, and indebtedness, if necessary.
The Company reviews, on a quarterly basis, the amount of the common dividend in light of
current and projected future cash flows from the sources noted above and also considers the
requirements needed to maintain its REIT status. In addition, the Company has certain covenants
under its Credit Facility which could limit the amount of dividends paid. In general, dividends of
any amount can be paid as long as leverage, as defined in the facility, is less than 55%, and the
Company is not in default under its facility. Certain conditions also apply in which the Company
can still pay dividends if leverage is above that amount. The Company routinely monitors the
status of its dividend payments in light of the Credit Facility covenants.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
General. The Company has a number of off balance sheet joint ventures with varying
structures, as described in Note 4 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. Most of the joint
ventures in which the Company has an interest are involved in the ownership, acquisition and/or
development of real estate. The venture will fund capital requirements or operational needs with
cash from operations or financing proceeds, if possible. If additional capital is deemed
necessary, the venture may request a contribution from the partners, and the Company will evaluate
such request. In particular, the Company anticipates approximately $19.6 million in additional
equity to fund project construction at the EP I joint venture. Additionally, subsequent to
quarter-end, a large lease was signed at Ten Peachtree Place Associates, which the Company
estimates contributions of approximately $6.3 million will be needed to fund tenant improvement
costs. Except as previously discussed, based on the nature of the activities conducted in these
ventures, management cannot estimate with any degree of accuracy amounts that the Company may be
required to fund in the short or long-term. However, management does not believe that additional
funding of these ventures will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results
of operations.
24
Table of Contents
Debt. At June 30, 2011, the Companys share of unconsolidated joint venture debt to third
parties was approximately $163.9 million. These loans are generally mortgage or construction loans,
most of which are non-recourse to the Company, except as described in the paragraph below. In
addition, in certain instances, the Company provides non-recourse carve-out guarantees on these
non-recourse loans. Certain of these loans have variable interest rates, which creates exposure to
the ventures in the form of market risk to interest rate changes.
At June 30, 2011, approximately $29.1 million of the loans at unconsolidated joint ventures
were recourse to the Company. CF Murfreesboro Associates (CF Murfreesboro) constructed and owns
a retail center, and the Company is a 50% partner. CF Murfreesboro has a $113.2 million facility
that matures on July 20, 2013, of which approximately $100.7 million was drawn at June 30, 2011.
The Company has a $26.2 million repayment guarantee on the loan.
The Company guarantees 25%
of two of the four outstanding loans at the Cousins Watkins LLC joint venture, which
owns four retail shopping centers. The loans have a total capacity of $16.3 million, of
which the Company guarantees approximately $4.1 million. At June 30, 2011,
the Company guaranteed $2.9 million, based on current amounts outstanding under these loans.
EP I, a venture formed in the second quarter of 2011, in which the Company has a 75% interest,
entered into a $61.1 million construction loan agreement upon venture formation to fund the
construction of a mixed-use project in Atlanta, Georgia. In connection with the loan, the Company
guaranteed repayment of 18.75% of the amount available, or $11.5 million, of the outstanding
balance. The amount outstanding under this loan is minimal as of June 30, 2011.
Bonds. The unconsolidated joint ventures also had performance bonds of $824,000 at June 30,
2011, which the Company guarantees through an indemnity agreement with the bond issuer. These
performance bonds relate to construction projects at the retail center owned by CF Murfreesboro.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes in the Companys critical accounting policies from those
disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
There have been no material changes in the market risk associated with the Companys notes
payable at June 30, 2011 compared to that as disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information
is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls
and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding
managements control objectives. We also have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. As
we do not always control or manage these entities, our disclosure controls and procedures with
respect to such entities are necessarily more limited than those we maintain with respect to our
consolidated subsidiaries.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer along
with the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness, design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon the
foregoing, the Chief Executive Officer along with the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective. In
addition, based on such evaluation we have identified no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
25
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings, claims and administrative proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are expected to be covered by liability
insurance. Management makes assumptions and estimates concerning the likelihood and amount of any
potential loss relating to these matters using the latest information available. The Company
records a liability for litigation if an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss or
range of loss can be reasonably estimated. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and a reasonable
estimate of the loss is a range, the Company accrues the best estimate within the range. If no
amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, the Company accrues the minimum
amount within the range. If an unfavorable outcome is probable but the amount of the loss cannot
be reasonably estimated, the Company discloses the nature of the litigation and indicates that an
estimate of the loss or range of loss cannot be made. If an unfavorable outcome is reasonably
possible and the estimated loss is material, the Company discloses the nature and estimate of the
possible loss of the litigation. The Company does not disclose information with respect to
litigation where an unfavorable outcome is considered to be remote. Based on current expectations,
such matters, both individually and in the aggregate, are not expected to have a material adverse
effect on the liquidity, results of operations, business or financial condition of the Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There has been no material change in the Companys risk factors from those outlined in Item 1A
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
For information on the Companys equity compensation plans, see Note 6 of the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
On May 6, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a common stock repurchase
plan of up to 5,000,000 shares, which was in effect through May 9, 2011. The Company repurchased
878,500 shares under this plan. In total, under all repurchase plans, the Company has repurchased
3,570,082 shares of common stock at an average price of $24.32. On November 10, 2008, the common
stock repurchase plan was expanded to include authorization to repurchase up to $20 million of
preferred shares. This program was expanded on November 18, 2008 to include all 4,000,000 shares
of both of the Companys Series A and Series B Preferred Stock (totaling 8,000,000 shares). The
Company has repurchased 1,215,090 preferred shares under this plan at an average price of $12.99.
No purchases of common or preferred stock occurred during the second quarter of 2011. The
repurchase plan expired on May 9, 2011 and was not extended or replaced.
During the second quarter 2011, the Company did not repurchase any common shares outside of
its publicly-announced repurchase plan. Repurchases outside the plan generally relate to shares
turned in or tax remittances related to stock-based compensation activities.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
26
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits.
3.1
|
Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended
August 9, 1999, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
3.1.1
|
Articles of Amendment to Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended July 22, 2003, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2003, and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
3.1.2
|
Articles of Amendment to Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended December 15, 2004, filed as Exhibit 3(a)(i) to the
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
3.1.3
|
Articles of Amendment to Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended May 4, 2010, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 6, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
3.2
|
Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended and restated June 6, 2009, filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 8, 2009, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
11
|
Computation of Per Share Earnings* |
|
31.1
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
* | Data required by ASC 260, Earnings per Share, is provided in Note 3 to the Condensed
Consolidated financial statements included in this report. |
27
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED |
||||
/s/ Gregg D. Adzema | ||||
Gregg D. Adzema | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
August 3, 2011
28