CubeSmart - Annual Report: 2011 (Form 10-K)

Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

x         ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

 

OR

 

o           TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                   to                 

 

Commission file number 001-32324 (CubeSmart)

Commission file number 000-54662 (CubeSmart, L.P.)

 

CUBESMART

CUBESMART, L.P.

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (610) 293-5700

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  Units of General Partnership Interest of CubeSmart, L.P.

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

 

CubeSmart	Yes x No o
CubeSmart, L.P.	Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

 

CubeSmart	Yes o No x
CubeSmart, L.P.	Yes o No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

CubeSmart	Yes x No o
CubeSmart, L.P.	Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 

CubeSmart	Yes x No o
CubeSmart, L.P.	Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

 

CubeSmart	Yes x No o
CubeSmart, L.P.	Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

 

CubeSmart:

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company o

 

CubeSmart, L.P.:

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer x

Smaller reporting company o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

CubeSmart	Yes o No x
CubeSmart, L.P.	Yes o No x

 

As of June 30, 2011, the last business day of CubeSmart’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of common shares held by non-affiliates of CubeSmart was $1,039,945,763. As of February 27, 2012, the number of common shares of CubeSmart outstanding was 122,851,716.

 

As of June 30, 2011, the aggregate market value of the 4,729,136 units of limited partnership (the “Units”) held by non-affiliates of CubeSmart, L.P. was $49,750,511 based upon the last reported sale price of $10.52 per share on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2011 of the common shares of CubeSmart, the sole general partner of CubeSmart, L.P. (For this computation, the market value of all Units beneficially owned by CubeSmart has been excluded.)

 

Documents incorporated by reference:  Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of CubeSmart to be filed subsequently with the SEC are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

 

 

Table of Contents

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

 

This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 of CubeSmart (the “Parent Company” or “CubeSmart”) and CubeSmart, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). The Parent Company is a Maryland real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns its assets and conducts its operations through the Operating Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, and subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership.  The Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and their consolidated subsidiaries are collectively referred to in this report as the “Company.” In addition, terms such as “we”, “us”, or “our” used in this report may refer to the Company, the Parent Company, or the Operating Partnership.

 

The Parent Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of December 31, 2011, owned a 96.3% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. The remaining 3.7% interest consists of common units of limited partnership issued by the Operating Partnership to third parties in exchange for contributions of properties to the Operating Partnership. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Parent Company has full and complete authority over the Operating Partnership’s day-to-day operations and management.

 

Management operates the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management teams of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership acting through its general partner are identical.

 

There are a few differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, which are reflected in the note disclosures in this report. The Company believes it is important to understand the differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership in the context of how these entities operate as a consolidated enterprise. The Parent Company is a REIT, whose only material asset is its ownership of the partnership interests of the Operating Partnership and subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership.  As a result, the Parent Company does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, issuing public equity from time to time and guaranteeing the debt obligations of the Operating Partnership and subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all the assets of the Company and, directly or indirectly, holds the ownership interests in the Company’s real estate ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the Company’s business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from equity issuances by the Parent Company, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units, the Operating Partnership generates the capital required by the Company’s business through the Operating Partnership’s operations, by the Operating Partnership’s direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness or through the issuance of partnership units of the Operating Partnership or equity interests in subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership.

 

The Company believes that combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership into a single report will:

 

·                                facilitate a better understanding by the investors of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling them to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;

·                                remove duplicative disclosures and provide a more straightforward presentation in light of the fact that a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership; and

·                                create time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

 

In order to highlight the differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, the separate sections in this report for the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership specifically refer to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership. In the sections that combine disclosures of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to such disclosures as those of the Company. Although the Operating Partnership is generally the entity that directly or indirectly enters into contracts and real estate ventures and holds assets and debt, reference to the Company is appropriate because the business is one enterprise and the Parent Company operates the business through the Operating Partnership.

 

As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, the Parent Company consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes. The Parent Company does not have significant assets other than its investment in the Operating Partnership. The substantive difference between the Parent Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s filings is the fact that the Parent Company is a REIT with public shares, while the Operating Partnership is a partnership with no publicly traded equity. In the financial statements, this difference is primarily reflected in the equity (or capital for Operating Partnership) section of the consolidated balance sheets and in the consolidated statements of equity (or capital) and

 

2

Table of Contents

 

comprehensive income (loss). Apart from the different equity treatment, the consolidated financial statements of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are nearly identical.  The separate discussions of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand the results of the Company’s operations on a consolidated basis and how management operates the Company.

 

This report also includes separate Item 9A (Controls and Procedures) disclosures and separate Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications for each of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership in order to establish that the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of each entity have made the requisite certifications and that the Parent Company and Operating Partnership are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350.

 

3

Table of Contents

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I		5
Item 1.	Business	6
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	12
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	24
Item 2.	Properties	25
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	33
Item 4.	Mining Safety Disclosures	33
PART II		34
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	34
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	36
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	41
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	56
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	56
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	56
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	57
Item 9B.	Other Information	58
PART III		59
Item 10.	Trustees, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	59
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	59
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters	59
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Trustee Independence	59
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	60
PART IV		61
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	61

 

4

Table of Contents

 

PART I

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and other statements and information publicly disseminated by the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such statements are based on assumptions and expectations that may not be realized and are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy and some of which might not even be anticipated. Although we believe the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, future events and actual results, performance, transactions or achievements, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results, performance, transactions or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Risks, uncertainties and other factors that might cause such differences, some of which could be material, include, but are not limited to:

 

·         national and local economic, business, real estate and other market conditions;

 

·         the competitive environment in which we operate, including our ability to raise rental rates;

 

·         the execution of our business plan;

 

·         the availability of external sources of capital;

 

·         financing risks, including the risk of over-leverage and the corresponding risk of default on our mortgage and other debt and potential inability to refinance existing indebtedness;

 

·         increases in interest rates and operating costs;

 

·         counterparty non-performance related to the use of derivative financial instruments;

 

·         our ability to maintain our status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes;

 

·         acquisition and development risks;

 

·         increases in taxes, fees, and assessments from state and local jurisdictions;

 

·         changes in real estate and zoning laws or regulations;

 

·         risks related to natural disasters;

 

·   regulatory risk- Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)/Governance

 

·         potential environmental and other liabilities;

 

·         other factors affecting the real estate industry generally or the self-storage industry in particular; and

 

·         other risks identified from time to time, in other reports we file with the SEC or in other documents that we publicly disseminate.

 

We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as may be required by applicable securities laws.

 

5

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

 

Overview

 

We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate company focused primarily on the ownership, operation, management, acquisition and development of self-storage facilities in the United States.

 

As of December 31, 2011, we owned 370 self-storage facilities located in 26 states and in the District of Columbia containing an aggregate of approximately 24.4 million rentable square feet.  As of December 31, 2011, approximately 78.4% of the rentable square footage at our owned facilities was leased to approximately 173,000 tenants, and no single tenant represented a significant concentration of our revenues.  As of December 31, 2011 we owned facilities in the District of Columbia and the following 26 states:  Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.  In addition, as of December 31, 2011, we managed 103 properties for third parties, bringing the total number of properties we owned and/or managed to 473.  As of December 31, 2011 we managed facilities in the District of Columbia and the following 26 states:  Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, New Hampshire, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas and Virginia.

 

Our self-storage facilities are designed to offer affordable and easily-accessible storage space for our residential and commercial customers.  Our customers rent storage cubes for their exclusive use, typically on a month-to-month basis. Additionally, some of our facilities offer outside storage areas for vehicles and boats.  Our facilities are designed to accommodate both residential and commercial customers, with features such as wide aisles and load-bearing capabilities for large truck access.  All of our facilities have an on-site manager during business hours, and 255, or approximately 69%, of our facilities have a manager who resides in an apartment at the facility.  Our customers can access their storage cubes during business hours, and some of our facilities provide customers with 24-hour access through computer controlled access systems.  Our goal is to provide customers with the highest standard of facilities and service in the industry. To that end, approximately 72% of our facilities include climate controlled cubes, compared to the national average of 36% reported by the 2011 Self-Storage Almanac.

 

The Parent Company was formed in July 2004 as a Maryland REIT.  The Parent Company owns its assets and conducts its business through its operating partnership, CubeSmart, L.P. (our “Operating Partnership”), and its subsidiaries.  The Parent Company controls the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner and, as of December 31, 2011, owned an approximately 96.3% interest in the Operating Partnership.  The Operating Partnership has been engaged in virtually all aspects of the self-storage business, including the development, acquisition, management, ownership and operation of self-storage facilities.

 

Acquisition and Disposition Activity

 

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, we owned 370 and 363 facilities, respectively, that contained an aggregate of 24.4 million and 23.6 million rentable square feet with occupancy rates of 78.4% and 76.3%, respectively.

 

On October 24, 2011, we entered into a purchase agreement with the ownership entities to acquire a portfolio of 22 self-storage facilities branded under the name Storage Deluxe that contain an aggregate of approximately 1.6 million rentable square feet (the “Storage Deluxe Acquisition”). The aggregate purchase price for all the properties in the Storage Deluxe Acquisition is approximately $560 million, comprised of approximately $472 million payable in cash and the assumption of approximately $88 million of existing fixed-rate debt.  On November 3, 2011, we acquired 16 of the properties for approximately $357.3 million. The 16 properties purchased are located in New York, Connecticut and Pennsylvania.  We anticipate closing on the purchase of the remaining properties with a purchase price of approximately $202.7 million, including the assumption of $88 million of secured fixed-rate debt, immediately following completion of the loan assumption process, which we expect to conclude during the first quarter of 2012.

 

A complete listing of, and additional information about, our facilities is included in Item 2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The following is a summary of our 2011, 2010 and 2009 acquisition and disposition activity:

 

6

Table of Contents

 

Facility/Portfolio		Location		Transaction Date		Number of Facilities		Purchase / Sales Price (in thousands)
2011 Acquisitions:
Burke Lake Asset		Fairfax Station, VA		January 2011		1		$	14,000
West Dixie Asset		Miami, FL		April 2011		1		13,500
White Plains Asset		White Plains, NY		May 2011		1		23,000
Phoenix Asset		Phoenix, AZ		May 2011		1		612
Houston Asset		Houston, TX		June 2011		1		7,600
Duluth Asset		Duluth, GA		July 2011		1		2,500
Atlanta Assets		Atlanta, GA		July 2011		2		6,975
District Heights Asset		District Heights, MD		August 2011		1		10,400
Storage Deluxe Assets		Multiple locations in NY, CT, PA and VA		November 2011		16		357,310
Leesburg Asset		Leesburg, VA		November 2011		1		13,000
Washington, DC Asset		Washington, DC		December 2011		1		18,250
						27		$	467,147
2011 Dispositions:
Flagship Assets		Multiple locations in IN and OH		August 2011		18		$	43,500
Portage Asset		Portage, MI		November 2011		1		1,700
						19		$	45,200
2010 Acquisitions:
Frisco Asset		Frisco, TX		July 2010		1		$	5,800
New York City Assets		New York, NY		September 2010		2		26,700
Northeast Assets		Multiple locations in NJ, NY and MA		November 2010		5		18,560
Manassas Asset		Manassas, VA		November 2010		1		6,050
Apopka Asset		Orlando, FL		November 2010		1		4,235
Wyckoff Asset		Queens, NY		December 2010		1		13,600
McLearen Asset		McLearen, VA		December 2010		1		10,200
						12		$	85,145
2010 Dispositions:
Sun City Asset		Sun City, CA		October 2010		1		$	3,100
Inland Empire/Fayetteville Assets		Multiple locations in CA amd NC		December 2010		15		35,000
						16		$	38,100
2009 Dispositions:
68th Street Asset		Miami, FL		January 2009		1		$	2,973
Albuquerque, NM Asset		Albuquerque, NM		April 2009		1		2,825
S. Palmetto Asset		Ontario, CA		June 2009		1		5,925
Hotel Circle Asset		Albuquerque, NM		July 2009		1		3,600
Jersey City Asset		Jersey City, NJ		August 2009		1		11,625
Dale Mabry Asset		Tampa, FL		August 2009		1		2,800
Winner Assets 1		Multiple locations in CO		September 2009		6		17,300
Baton Rouge Asset (Eminent Domain)		Baton Rouge, LA		September 2009		(b)		1,918
North H Street Asset (Eminent Domain)		San Bernardino, CA		September 2009		1		(c)
Boulder Assets (a)		Boulder, CO		September 2009		4		32,000
Winner Assets 2		Multiple locations in CO		October 2009		2		6,600
Brecksville Asset		Brecksville, OH		November 2009		1		3,300
						20		$	90,866

 

7

Table of Contents

 

(a)          The Company provided $17.6 million in seller financing to the buyer as part of the Boulder Assets disposition, which was subsequently repaid during 2010.

 

(b)         Approximately one third of the Baton Rouge Asset was taken in conjunction with eminent domain proceedings.  The Company continues to own and operate the remaining two thirds of the asset and includes the asset in the Company’s total portfolio property count.

 

(c)          The entirety of the North H Street Asset was taken in conjunction with eminent domain proceedings and the Company removed this asset from its total portfolio asset count.  During 2011, the Company received compensation from the state of California.  Accordingly, the Company recognized $1.9 million of income during 2011.

 

The comparability of our results of operations is affected by the timing of acquisition and disposition activities during the periods reported.  At December 31, 2011 and 2010, we owned 370 and 363 self-storage facilities and related assets, respectively.  The following table summarizes the change in number of owned self-storage facilities from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2011:

 

		2011		2010
Balance - January 1		363		367
Facilities acquired		1		—
Facilities sold		—		—
Balance - March 31		364		367
Facilities acquired		4		—
Facilities consolidated		(1	)	—
Facilities sold		—		—
Balance - June 30		367		367
Facilities acquired		4		3
Facilities sold		(18	)	—
Balance - September 30		353		370
Facilities acquired		18		9
Facilities sold		(1	)	(16	)
Balance - December 31		370		363

 

Financing and Investing Activities

 

The following summarizes certain financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2011:

 

·      Storage Deluxe Acquisition.  On November 3, 2011, we acquired 16 properties from Storage Deluxe with a purchase price of approximately $357.3 million. The 16 properties purchased are located in New York, Connecticut and Pennsylvania.  In connection with this acquisition, we allocated a portion of the purchase price to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $18.1 million.

 

·      Facility Acquisitions.  In addition to the Storage Deluxe Acquisition, during the year ended December 31, 2011, we acquired 11 self-storage facilities located throughout the United States for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $109.8 million.  In connection with these acquisitions, we allocated a portion of the purchase price to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $7.0 million.

 

·      Facility Dispositions.  During the year ended December 31, 2011, we sold 19 self-storage facilities located throughout Indiana, Ohio and Michigan for an aggregate sales price of approximately $45.2 million.  These sales resulted in the recognition of gains that totaled $3.9 million.

 

·      Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures.  On September 26, 2011, we contributed $15.4 million to the capital of a limited partnership (the “HSRE Venture” or “HSREV”) in exchange for a 50% interest in the partnership.  HSREV owns nine storage facilities in Pennsylvania, Virginia, New York, New Jersey and Florida.  The other partner in HSRE, which holds the remaining 50% interest, is unaffiliated with the Company.

 

8

Table of Contents

 

·       Entered into Term Loan Facility and the 2011 Credit Facility. On June 20, 2011, we entered into an unsecured Term Loan Agreement (the “Term Loan Facility”) which consisted of a $100 million term loan with a five-year maturity and a $100 million term loan with a seven-year maturity. A portion of these proceeds were used to repay a $100 million term loan that was part of the prior unsecured credit facility (the “Prior Facility”). We incurred costs of $2.1 million in connection with executing the agreement and capitalized such costs as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization on our consolidated balance sheet. Additionally, we wrote off deferred financing fees related to the repayment of a portion of the Prior Facility, which totaled $2.1 million. On December 9, 2011, we entered into a Credit Agreement providing for a credit facility comprised of a $100 million unsecured term loan maturing in December 2014; a $200 million unsecured term loan maturing in March 2017; and a $300 million unsecured revolving facility maturing in December 2015 (the “2011 Credit Facility”). The 2011 Credit Facility replaces in its entirety our Prior Facility, which was last amended on September 29, 2010, and which, as of the date of its replacement, consisted of a $100 million unsecured term loan and a $250 million unsecured revolving credit facility. In connection with obtaining the new 2011 Credit Facility, we paid additional deferred financing costs of $3.4 million and wrote off deferred financing fees related to the Prior Facility of $6.1 million.

 

·      Offering Proceeds.  During October 2011, we completed a public offering of 23 million common shares at a public offering price of $9.20, which reflects the full exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase 3 million shares to cover over-allotments. We received approximately $202.5 million in net proceeds from the offering after deducting the underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses.  During November 2011, we completed a public offering of 3.1 million Series A preferred shares at a public offering price of $25.00 per share for gross proceeds of $77.5 million. We received approximately $74.8 million in net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses. We used proceeds from both these offerings to pay a portion of the cash purchase price of the Storage Deluxe Acquisition.  On September 16, 2011, we further amended our sales agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (the “Sales Agent”) dated April 3, 2009, as amended on January 26, 2011 (as amended, the “Sales Agreement”), to increase the number of common shares that the Sales Agent may sell under the Sales Agreement from 15 million to 20 million. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we sold 140,000 shares under the program at an average sales price of $10.75 per share resulting in net proceeds of $1.5 million.  We have sold 8.2 million shares with an average sales price of $7.30 per share resulting in net proceeds of $60.1 million since the inception of the program in 2009.

 

Business Strategy

 

Our business strategy consists of several elements:

 

·         Maximize cash flow from our facilities — Our operating strategy focuses on maximizing sustainable rents at our facilities while achieving and sustaining occupancy targets.  We utilize our operating systems and experienced personnel to manage the balance between rental rates, discounts, and physical occupancy with an objective of maximizing our rental revenue.

 

·         Acquire facilities within targeted markets — During 2012, we intend to pursue selective acquisitions in markets that we believe have high barriers to entry, strong demographic fundamentals and demand for storage in excess of storage capacity.  We believe the self-storage industry will continue to afford us opportunities for growth through acquisitions due to the highly fragmented composition of the industry.

 

·         Dispose of facilities not in targeted markets — During 2012, we intend to continue to reduce exposure in slower growth, lower barrier-to-entry markets.  We intend to use proceeds from these transactions to fund acquisitions within target markets.

 

·         Grow our third party management business — We intend to pursue additional third party management opportunities in markets where we currently maintain management that can be extended to additional facilities.  We intend to leverage our current platform to take advantage of consolidation in the industry.  We plan to utilize our relationships with third party owners to help source future acquisitions.

 

9

Table of Contents

 

Investment and Market Selection Process

 

We maintain a disciplined and focused process in the acquisition and development of self-storage facilities.  Our investment committee, comprised of our named executive officers and led by Dean Jernigan, our Chief Executive Officer, oversees our investment process.  Our investment process involves six stages — identification, initial due diligence, economic assessment, investment committee approval (and when required, Board approval), final due diligence, and documentation.  Through our investment committee, we intend to focus on the following criteria:

 

·   Targeted markets — Our targeted markets include areas where we currently maintain management that can be extended to additional facilities, or where we believe that we can acquire a significant number of facilities efficiently and within a short period of time.  We evaluate both the broader market and the immediate area, typically five miles around the facility, for their ability to support above-average demographic growth.  We seek to increase our presence primarily in areas that we expect will experience growth, including areas within Illinois, Texas, Florida, Georgia, California and the Northeastern and Middle Atlantic areas of the United States and to enter new markets should suitable opportunities arise.

 

·   Quality of facility — We focus on self-storage facilities that have good visibility and are located near retail centers, which typically provide high traffic corridors and are generally located near residential communities and commercial customers.

 

·   Growth potential — We target acquisitions that offer growth potential through increased operating efficiencies and, in some cases, through additional leasing efforts, renovations or expansions.  In addition to acquiring single facilities, we seek to invest in portfolio acquisitions, including those offering significant potential for increased operating efficiency and the ability to spread our fixed costs across a large base of facilities.

 

Segment

 

We have one reportable segment:  we own, operate, develop, manage and acquire self-storage facilities.

 

Concentration

 

Our self-storage facilities are located in major metropolitan areas as well as suburban areas and have numerous tenants per facility. No single tenant represented a significant concentration of our 2011 revenues.  Our facilities in Florida, California, Texas and Illinois provided approximately 17%, 12%, 10% and 7%, respectively, of our total 2011 revenues.  Our facilities in Florida, California, Texas and Illinois provided approximately 18%, 15%, 10% and 7%, respectively, of our total 2010 revenues.

 

Seasonality

 

We typically experience seasonal fluctuations in occupancy levels at our facilities, with the levels generally slightly higher during the summer months due to increased moving activity.

 

Financing Strategy

 

Although our organizational documents do not limit the amount of debt that we may incur, we maintain a capital structure that we believe is reasonable and prudent and that will enable us to have ample cash flow to cover debt service and make distributions to our shareholders.  As of December 31, 2011, our debt to total capitalization ratio (determined by dividing the carrying value of our total indebtedness by the sum of (a) the market value of the Parent Company’s outstanding common shares and units of the Operating Partnership held by third parties and (b) the carrying value of our total indebtedness) was approximately 36.0% compared to approximately 38.5% as of December 31, 2010.  Our ratio of debt to the depreciated cost of our real estate assets as of December 31, 2011 was approximately 42.4% compared to approximately 43.1% as of December 31, 2010.  We expect to finance additional investments in self-storage facilities through the most attractive available sources of capital at the time of the transaction, in a manner consistent with maintaining a strong financial position and future financial flexibility.  These capital sources may include borrowings under the revolving portion of our 2011 Credit Facility and additional secured or unsecured financings, sales of common or preferred shares of the Parent Company in public offerings or private placements, and issuances of common or preferred units in our Operating Partnership in exchange

 

10

Table of Contents

 

for contributed properties or cash and formations of joint ventures.  We also may sell facilities that we no longer view as core assets and reallocate the sales proceeds to fund other acquisitions.

 

Competition

 

Over the last decade, new self-storage facility development has intensified the competition among self-storage operators in many market areas in which we operate.  Self-storage facilities compete based on a number of factors, including location, rental rates, security, suitability of the facility’s design to prospective customers’ needs and the manner in which the facility is operated and marketed.  In particular, the number of competing self-storage facilities in a particular market could have a material effect on our occupancy levels, rental rates and on the overall operating performance of our facilities.  We believe that the primary competition for potential customers of any of our self-storage facilities comes from other self-storage facilities within a three-mile radius of that facility.  We believe our facilities are well-positioned within their respective markets and we emphasize customer convenience, security and professionalism.

 

Our key competitors include local and regional operators as well as the other public self-storage REITS, including Public Storage, Sovran Self Storage and Extra Space Storage Inc.  These companies, some of which operate significantly more facilities than we do and have greater resources than we have, and other entities may generally be able to accept more risk than we determine is prudent for us, including risks with respect to the geographic proximity of facility investments and the payment of higher facility acquisition prices.  This competition may generally reduce the number of suitable acquisition opportunities available to us, increase the price required to consummate the acquisition of particular facilities and reduce the demand for self-storage space in areas where our facilities are located.  Nevertheless, we believe that our experience in operating, managing acquiring, developing and obtaining financing for self-storage facilities should enable us to compete effectively.

 

Government Regulation

 

We are subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to lien sale rights and procedures and various federal, state and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operation of self-storage facilities.

 

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real property may become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances released on or in its property.  These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release of such hazardous substances.  The presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, when released, may adversely affect the property owner’s ability to sell the real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral, and may cause the property owner to incur substantial remediation costs.  In addition to claims for cleanup costs, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in a claim by a private party for personal injury or a claim by an adjacent property owner or user for property damage.  We may also become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances stored at the facilities by a customer even though storage of hazardous substances would be without our knowledge or approval and in violation of the customer’s storage lease agreement with us.

 

Our practice is to conduct or obtain environmental assessments in connection with the acquisition or development of facilities. Whenever the environmental assessment for one of our facilities indicates that a facility is impacted by soil or groundwater contamination from prior owners/operators or other sources, we work with our environmental consultants and, where appropriate, state governmental agencies, to ensure that the facility is either cleaned up, that no cleanup is necessary because the low level of contamination poses no significant risk to public health or the environment, or that the responsibility for cleanup rests with a third party.  In certain cases, the Company has purchased environmental liability insurance coverage to indemnify the Company against claims for contamination or other adverse environmental conditions that may affect a property.

 

We are not aware of any environmental cleanup liability that we believe will have a material adverse effect on us.  We cannot assure you, however, that these environmental assessments and investigations have revealed or will reveal all potential environmental liabilities, that no prior owner created any material environmental condition not known to us or the independent consultant or that future events or changes in environmental laws will not result in the imposition of environmental liability on us.

 

11

Table of Contents

 

We have not received notice from any governmental authority of any material noncompliance, claim or liability in connection with any of our facilities, nor have we been notified of a claim for personal injury or property damage by a private party in connection with any of our facilities relating to environmental conditions.

 

We are not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of our facilities that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, and we do not expect that the cost of compliance with environmental regulations will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.  We cannot assure you, however, that this will continue to be the case.

 

Insurance

 

We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss insurance covering all of the facilities in our portfolio.  We carry environmental insurance coverage on certain properties in our portfolio.  We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice.  We do not carry insurance for losses such as loss from riots, war or acts of God, and, in some cases, environmental hazards, because such coverage is not available or is not available at commercially reasonable rates.  Some of our policies, such as those covering losses due to terrorist activities, hurricanes, floods and earthquakes, are insured subject to limitations involving large deductibles or co-payments and policy limits that may not be sufficient to cover losses.  We also carry liability insurance to insure against personal injuries that might be sustained on our properties and director and officer liability insurance.

 

Offices

 

Our principal executive office is located at 460 E. Swedesford Road, Suite 3000, Wayne, PA 19087.  Our telephone number is (610) 293-5700.  We believe that our current facilities are adequate for our present and future operations.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2011, we employed 1,276 employees, of whom 193 were corporate executive and administrative personnel and 1,083 were property level personnel.  We believe that our relations with our employees are good.  Our employees are not unionized.

 

Available Information

 

We file registration statements, proxy statements, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, with the SEC.  You may obtain copies of these documents by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 or by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.  Our internet website address is www.cubesmart.com.  You also can obtain on our website, free of charge, a copy of our annual report on Form 10-K, the Operating Partnership’s registration statement on Form 10, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports or amendments with, or furnish them to, the SEC.  Our internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Also available on our website, free of charge, are copies of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters for each of the committees of our Board of Trustees — the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Compensation Committee. Copies of each of these documents are also available in print free of charge, upon request by any shareholder.  You can obtain copies of these documents by contacting Investor Relations by mail at 460 E. Swedesford Road, Suite 3000, Wayne, PA 19087.

 

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

 

Overview

 

Investors should carefully consider, among other factors, the risks set forth below. These risks are not the only ones that we may face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations and hinder our ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

 

12

Table of Contents

 

Risks Related to our Business and Operations

 

Adverse macroeconomic and business conditions may significantly and negatively affect our revenues, profitability and results of operations.

 

The United States recently experienced an economic slowdown that has resulted in higher unemployment, shrinking demand for products, large-scale business failures and tight credit markets.  Our results of operations may be sensitive to changes in overall economic conditions that impact consumer spending, including discretionary spending, as well as to increased bad debts due to recessionary pressures.  A continuation of, or slow recovery from, ongoing adverse economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income, such as employment levels, business conditions, interest rates, tax rates, fuel and energy costs, and other matters could reduce consumer spending or cause consumers to shift their spending to other products and services.  A general reduction in the level of discretionary spending or shifts in consumer discretionary spending could adversely affect our growth and profitability.

 

It is difficult to determine the breadth and duration of the economic and financial market problems and the many ways in which they may affect our customers and our business in general.  Nonetheless, continuation or further worsening of these difficult financial and macroeconomic conditions could have a significant adverse effect on our sales, profitability and results of operations.

 

Many states and local jurisdictions are facing severe budgetary problems which may have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

 

Many states and jurisdictions are facing severe budgetary problems.  Action that may be taken in response to these problems, such as increases in property taxes on commercial properties, changes to sales taxes or other governmental efforts, including mandating medical insurance for employees, could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

 

Our financial performance is dependent upon the economic and other conditions of the markets in which our facilities are located.

 

We are susceptible to adverse developments in the markets in which we operate, such as business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, changing demographics and other factors.  Our facilities in Florida, California, Texas, New York,  Tennessee, Illinois, and Ohio accounted for approximately 16%, 13%, 11%, 7%, 7%, 7% and 6%, respectively, of our total rentable square feet as of December 31, 2011.  As a result of this geographic concentration of our facilities, we are particularly susceptible to adverse market conditions in these areas.  Any adverse economic or real estate developments in these markets, or in any of the other markets in which we operate, or any decrease in demand for self-storage space resulting from the local business climate could adversely affect our rental revenues, which could impair our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and pay distributions to our shareholders.

 

We face risks associated with facility acquisitions.

 

We intend to continue to acquire individual and portfolios of self-storage facilities that would increase our size and may potentially alter our capital structure.  Although we believe that the acquisitions that we expect to undertake in the future will enhance our future financial performance, the success of such transactions is subject to a number of factors, including the risks that:

 

·      we may not be able to obtain financing for acquisitions on favorable terms;

 

·      acquisitions may fail to perform as expected;

 

·      the actual costs of repositioning or redeveloping acquired facilities may be higher than our estimates;

 

·      acquisitions may be located in new markets where we may have limited knowledge and understanding of the local economy, an absence of business relationships in the area or an unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures;

 

·      there is only limited recourse, or no recourse, to the former owners of newly acquired facilities for unknown or undisclosed liabilities such as the clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination; claims by tenants, vendors

 

13

Table of Contents

 

or other persons arising on account of actions or omissions of the former owners of the facilities; ordinary course of business expenses; and claims by local governments, adjoining property owners, property owner associations, and easement holders for fees, assessments, taxes on other property-related changes.

 

As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of an acquired facility, we might be required to pay significant sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our financial results and cash flow.

 

We will incur costs and will face integration challenges when we acquire additional facilities.

 

As we acquire or develop additional self-storage facilities, we will be subject to risks associated with integrating and managing new facilities, including customer retention and mortgage default risks. In the case of a large portfolio purchase, we could experience strains in our existing management information capacity.  In addition, acquisitions or developments may cause disruptions in our operations and divert management’s attention away from day-to-day operations.  Furthermore, our profitability may suffer because we will be required to expense acquisition-related costs and amortize in future periods costs for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets.  Our failure to successfully integrate any future facilities into our portfolio could have an adverse effect on our operating costs and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

 

The acquisition of new facilities that lack operating history with us will make it more difficult to predict revenue potential.

 

We intend to continue to acquire additional facilities.  These acquisitions could fail to perform in accordance with expectations.  If we fail to accurately estimate occupancy levels, rental rates, operating costs or costs of improvements to bring an acquired facility up to the standards established for our intended market position, the performance of the facility may be below expectations.  Acquired facilities may have characteristics or deficiencies affecting their valuation or revenue potential that we have not yet discovered.  We cannot assure you that the performance of facilities acquired by us will increase or be maintained under our management.

 

We depend on external sources of capital that are outside of our control; the unavailability of capital from external sources could adversely affect our ability to acquire or develop facilities, satisfy our debt obligations and/or make distributions to shareholders.

 

We depend on external sources of capital to fund acquisitions and facility development, to satisfy our debt obligations and to make the required distributions to our shareholders in order to maintain our status as a REIT, which may or may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.  Our access to external sources of capital depends on a number of things, including the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.  If we are unable to obtain external sources of capital, we may not be able to acquire or develop facilities when strategic opportunities exist, satisfy our debt obligations or make distributions to shareholders that would permit us to qualify as a REIT or avoid paying tax on our REIT taxable income.

 

Rising operating expenses could reduce our cash flow and funds available for future distributions.

 

Our facilities and any other facilities we acquire or develop in the future are and will be subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any or all of which may negatively affect us.  Our facilities are subject to increases in operating expenses such as real estate and other taxes, personnel costs including the cost of providing specific medical coverage to our employees, utilities, insurance, administrative expenses and costs for repairs and maintenance.  If operating expenses increase without a corresponding increase in revenues, our profitability could diminish and limit our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

 

We cannot assure you of our ability to pay dividends in the future.

 

Historically, we have paid quarterly distributions to our shareholders, and we intend to continue to pay quarterly dividends and to make distributions to our shareholders in amounts such that all or substantially all of our taxable income in each year, subject to certain adjustments, is distributed.  This, along with other factors, should enable us to continue to qualify for the tax benefits accorded to a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.  We have not established a minimum dividends payment level and all future distributions will be made at the discretion of our Board of Trustees.  Our ability to pay dividends will depend upon, among other factors:

 

·      the operational and financial performance of our facilities;

 

14

Table of Contents

 

·      capital expenditures with respect to existing and newly acquired facilities;

 

·      general and administrative costs associated with our operation as a publicly-held REIT;

 

·      maintenance of our REIT status;

 

·      the amount of, and the interest rates on, our debt;

 

·      the absence of significant expenditures relating to environmental and other regulatory matters; and

 

·      other risk factors described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Certain of these matters are beyond our control and any significant difference between our expectations and actual results could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and our ability to make distributions to shareholders.

 

If we are unable to promptly re-let our cubes or if the rates upon such re-letting are significantly lower than expected, then our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.

 

We derive revenues principally from rents received from customers who rent cubes at our self-storage facilities under month-to-month leases.  Any delay in re-letting cubes as vacancies arise would reduce our revenues and harm our operating results.  In addition, lower than expected rental rates upon re-letting could adversely affect our revenues and impede our growth.

 

Property ownership through joint ventures may limit our ability to act exclusively in our interest.

 

We have in the past, and may continue to, co-invest with third parties through joint ventures.  In any such joint venture, we may not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the facilities owned through joint ventures. Investments in joint ventures may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present when a third party is not involved, including the possibility that joint venture partners might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions.  Joint venture partners may have business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives.  Such investments also have the potential risk of impasse on strategic decisions, such as a sale, in cases where neither we nor the joint venture partner would have full control over the joint venture. In other circumstances, joint venture partners may have the ability without our agreement to make certain major decisions, including decisions about sales, capital expenditures and/or financing.  Any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners could result in litigation or arbitration that could increase our expenses and distract our officers and/or Trustees from focusing their time and effort on our business.  In addition, we might in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our joint venture partners, and the activities of a joint venture could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT, even though we do not control the joint venture.

 

We face risks and significant competition associated with actions taken by our competitors.

 

Actions by our competitors may decrease or prevent increases of the occupancy and rental rates of our properties.  We compete with numerous developers, owners and operators of self-storage, including other REITs, some of which own or may in the future own properties similar to ours in the same submarkets in which our properties are located and some of which may have greater capital resources.  In addition, due to the relatively low cost of each individual self-storage facility, other developers, owners and operators have the capability to build additional facilities that may compete with our facilities.

 

If our competitors build new facilities that compete with our facilities or offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose potential tenants, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to retain tenants when our tenants’ leases expire.  As a result, our financial condition, cash flow, cash available for distribution, market price of our stock and ability to satisfy our debt service obligations could be materially adversely affected.  In addition, increased competition for customers may require us to make capital improvements to facilities that we would not have otherwise made.  Any unbudgeted capital improvements we undertake may reduce cash available for distributions to our shareholders.

 

15

Table of Contents

 

We also face significant competition for acquisitions and development opportunities.  Some of our competitors have greater financial resources than we do and a greater ability to borrow funds to acquire facilities.  These competitors may also be willing to accept more risk than we can prudently manage, including risks with respect to the geographic proximity of investments and the payment of higher facility acquisition prices.  This competition for investments may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us, may increase acquisition costs and may reduce demand for self-storage space in certain areas where our facilities are located and, as a result, adversely affect our operating results.

 

We may become subject to litigation or threatened litigation which may divert management’s time and attention, require us to pay damages and expenses or restrict the operation of our business.

 

We may become subject to disputes with commercial parties with whom we maintain relationships or other parties with whom we do business.  Any such dispute could result in litigation between us and the other parties.  Whether or not any dispute actually proceeds to litigation, we may be required to devote significant management time and attention to its successful resolution (through litigation, settlement or otherwise), which would detract from our management’s ability to focus on our business.  Any such resolution could involve the payment of damages or expenses by us, which may be significant.  In addition, any such resolution could involve our agreement with terms that restrict the operation of our business.

 

One type of commercial dispute could involve our use of our brand name and other intellectual property (for example, logos, signage and other marks), for which we generally have common law rights but no federal trademark registration.  There are other commercial parties, at both a local and national level, that may assert that our use of our brand names and other intellectual property conflict with their rights to use brand names and other intellectual property that they consider to be similar to ours.  Any such commercial dispute and related resolution would involve all of the risks described above, including, in particular, our agreement to restrict the use of our brand name or other intellectual property.

 

We also could be sued for personal injuries and/or property damage occurring on our properties.  We maintain liability insurance with limits that we believe adequate to provide for the defense and/or payment of any damages arising from such lawsuits.  There can be no assurance that such coverage will cover all costs and expenses from such suits.

 

Potential losses may not be covered by insurance, which could result in the loss of our investment in a facility and the future cash flows from the facility.

 

We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss insurance covering all of the facilities in our portfolio.  We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice.  We do not carry insurance for losses such as loss from riots, war or acts of God, and, in some cases, flooding and environmental hazards, because such coverage is not available or is not available at commercially reasonable rates.  Some of our policies, such as those covering losses due to terrorism, hurricanes, floods and earthquakes, are insured subject to limitations involving large deductibles or co-payments and policy limits that may not be sufficient to cover losses.  If we experience a loss at a facility that is uninsured or that exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in that facility as well as the anticipated future cash flows from that facility.  Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations, and other factors also might make it impractical or undesirable to use insurance proceeds to replace a facility after it has been damaged or destroyed.  In addition, if the damaged facilities are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these facilities were irreparably damaged.

 

Our insurance coverage may not comply fully with certain loan requirements.

 

Certain of our properties serve as collateral for our mortgage-backed debt, some of which was assumed in connection with our acquisition of facilities and requires us to maintain insurance at levels and on terms that are not commercially reasonable in the current insurance environment.  We may be unable to obtain required insurance coverage if the cost and/or availability make it impractical or impossible to comply with debt covenants.  If we cannot comply with a lender’s requirements in any respect, the lender could declare a default that could affect our ability to obtain future financing and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows and our ability to obtain future financing.  In addition, we may be required to self-insure against certain losses or our insurance costs may increase.

 

16

Table of Contents

 

Potential liability for environmental contamination could result in substantial costs.

 

We are subject to federal, state and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operation of self-storage facilities.  If we fail to comply with those laws, we could be subject to significant fines or other governmental sanctions.

 

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at a facility and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean up costs incurred by such parties in connection with contamination.  Such liability may be imposed whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of these hazardous or toxic substances.  The cost of investigation, remediation or removal of such substances may be substantial, and the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such facility or to borrow using such facility as collateral.  In addition, in connection with the ownership, operation and management of real properties, we are potentially liable for property damage or injuries to persons and property.

 

Our practice is to conduct or obtain environmental assessments in connection with the acquisition or development of additional facilities.  We carry environmental insurance coverage on certain properties in our portfolio.  We obtain or examine environmental assessments from qualified and reputable environmental consulting firms (and intend to conduct such assessments prior to the acquisition or development of additional facilities).  The environmental assessments received to date have not revealed, nor do we have actual knowledge of, any environmental liability that we believe will have a material adverse effect on us.  However, we cannot assure you that any environmental assessments performed have identified or will identify all material environmental conditions, that any prior owner of any facility did not create a material environmental condition not actually known to us or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist with respect to any of our facilities.

 

Americans with Disabilities Act and applicable state accessibility act compliance may require unanticipated expenditures.

 

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and applicable state accessibility act laws (collectively, the “ADA”), all places of public accommodation are required to meet federal requirements related to physical access and use by disabled persons.  A number of other federal, state and local laws may also impose access and other similar requirements at our facilities.  A failure to comply with the ADA or similar state or local requirements could result in the governmental imposition of fines or the award of damages to private litigants affected by the noncompliance.  Although we believe that our facilities comply in all material respects with these requirements (or would be eligible for applicable exemptions from material requirements because of adaptive assistance provided), a determination that one or more of our facilities is not in compliance with the ADA or similar state or local requirements would result in the incurrence of additional costs associated with bringing the facilities into compliance.  If we are required to make substantial modifications to comply with the ADA or similar state or local requirements, we may be required to incur significant unanticipated expenditures, which could have an adverse effect on our operating costs and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

 

Privacy concerns could result in regulatory changes that may harm our business.

 

Personal privacy has become a significant issue in the jurisdictions in which we operate.  Many jurisdictions in which we operate have imposed restrictions and requirements on the use of personal information by those collecting such information. Changes to law or regulations affecting privacy, if applicable to our business, could impose additional costs and liability on us and could limit our use and disclosure of such information.

 

We face system security risks as we depend upon automated processes and the Internet.

 

We are increasingly dependent upon automated information technology processes.  While we attempt to mitigate this risk through offsite backup procedures and contracted data centers that include, in some cases, redundant operations, we could still be severely impacted by a catastrophic occurrence, such as a natural disaster or a terrorist attack.  In addition, an increasing portion of our business operations are conducted over the Internet, increasing the risk of viruses that could cause system failures and disruptions of operations despite our deployment of anti-virus measures.  Experienced computer programmers may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate our confidential information, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns.

 

17

Table of Contents

 

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may adversely impact our performance and may affect the markets on which our securities are traded.

 

Terrorist attacks against our facilities, the United States or our interests, may negatively impact our operations and the value of our securities.  Attacks or armed conflicts could negatively impact the demand for self-storage facilities and increase the cost of insurance coverage for our facilities, which could reduce our profitability and cash flow.  Furthermore, any terrorist attacks or armed conflicts could result in increased volatility in or damage to the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy.

 

Risks Related to the Real Estate Industry

 

Our performance and the value of our self-storage facilities are subject to risks associated with our properties and with the real estate industry.

 

Our rental revenues and operating costs and the value of our real estate assets, and consequently the value of our securities, are subject to the risk that if our facilities do not generate revenues sufficient to meet our operating expenses, including debt service and capital expenditures, our cash flow and ability to pay distributions to our shareholders will be adversely affected.  Events or conditions beyond our control that may adversely affect our operations or the value of our facilities include but are not limited to:

 

·      downturns in the national, regional and local economic climate;

 

·      local or regional oversupply, increased competition or reduction in demand for self-storage space;

 

·      vacancies or changes in market rents for self-storage space;

 

·      inability to collect rent from customers;

 

·      increased operating costs, including maintenance, insurance premiums and real estate taxes;

 

·      changes in interest rates and availability of financing;

 

·      hurricanes, earthquakes and other natural disasters, civil disturbances, terrorist acts or acts of war that may result in uninsured or underinsured losses;

 

·      significant expenditures associated with acquisitions and development projects, such as debt service payments, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs which are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in revenues from a property;

 

·      costs of complying with changes in laws and governmental regulations, including those governing usage, zoning, the environment and taxes; and

 

·      the relative illiquidity of real estate investments.

 

In addition, prolonged periods of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates or declining demand for self-storage, or the public perception that any of these events may occur, could result in a general decline in rental revenues, which could impair our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders.

 

Rental revenues are significantly influenced by demand for self-storage space generally, and a decrease in such demand would likely have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.

 

Because our portfolio of facilities consists primarily of self-storage facilities, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry.  A decrease in the demand for self-storage space would have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.  Demand for self-storage space has been and could be adversely affected by ongoing weakness in the national, regional and local economies, changes in supply of, or demand for, similar or competing self-storage facilities in an area and the excess amount of self-storage space in a particular market. To

 

18

Table of Contents

 

the extent that any of these conditions occur, they are likely to affect market rents for self-storage space, which could cause a decrease in our rental revenue.  Any such decrease could impair our ability to satisfy debt service obligations and make distributions to our shareholders.

 

Because real estate is illiquid, we may not be able to sell properties when appropriate.

 

Real estate property investments generally cannot be sold quickly.  Also, the tax laws applicable to REITs require that we hold our facilities for investment, rather than sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forgo or defer sales of facilities that otherwise would be in our best interest.  Therefore, we may not be able to dispose of facilities promptly, or on favorable terms, in response to economic or other market conditions, which may adversely affect our financial position.

 

Risks Related to our Qualification and Operation as a REIT

 

Failure to qualify as a REIT would subject us to U.S. federal income tax which would reduce the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

 

We operate our business to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.  We have not requested and do not plan to request a ruling from the IRS that we qualify as a REIT, and the statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not binding on the IRS or any court.  As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on the income that we distribute currently to our shareholders.  Many of the REIT requirements, however, are highly technical and complex.  The determination that we are a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters and circumstances that may not be totally within our control.  For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income must come from specific passive sources, such as rent, that are itemized in the REIT tax laws.  In addition, to qualify as a REIT, we cannot own specified amounts of debt and equity securities of some issuers.  We also are required to distribute to our shareholders with respect to each year at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains.  The fact that we hold substantially all of our assets through the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements for us.  Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status and, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs and the ongoing importance of factual determinations, we cannot provide any assurance that we will continue to qualify as a REIT.  Furthermore, Congress and the IRS might make changes to the tax laws and regulations, and the courts might issue new rulings, that make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to remain qualified as a REIT.  If we fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and are able to avail ourselves of one or more of the statutory savings provisions in order to maintain our REIT status, we would nevertheless be required to pay penalty taxes of $50,000 or more for each such failure.

 

If we fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and are unable to avail ourselves of certain savings provisions set forth in the Internal Revenue Code, we would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates on all of our income.  As a taxable corporation, we would not be allowed to take a deduction for distributions to shareholders in computing our taxable income or pass through long term capital gains to individual shareholders at favorable rates.  We also could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes.  We would not be able to elect to be taxed as a REIT for four years following the year we first failed to qualify unless the IRS were to grant us relief under certain statutory provisions.  If we failed to qualify as a REIT, we would have to pay significant income taxes, which would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to our shareholders.  This likely would have a significant adverse effect on our earnings and likely would adversely affect the value of our securities. In addition, we would no longer be required to pay any distributions to shareholders.

 

Failure of the Operating Partnership (or a subsidiary partnership) to be treated as a partnership would have serious adverse consequences to our shareholders.

 

If the IRS were to successfully challenge the tax status of the Operating Partnership or any of its subsidiary partnerships for federal income tax purposes, the Operating Partnership or the affected subsidiary partnership would be taxable as a corporation.  In such event we would cease to qualify as a REIT and the imposition of a corporate tax on the Operating Partnership or a subsidiary partnership would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution from the Operating Partnership to us and ultimately to our shareholders.

 

19

Table of Contents

 

To maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to borrow funds on a short term basis during unfavorable market conditions.

 

As a REIT, we are subject to certain distribution requirements, including the requirement to distribute 90% of our REIT taxable income, that may result in our having to make distributions at a disadvantageous time or to borrow funds at unfavorable rates.  Compliance with this requirement may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

 

We will pay some taxes even if we qualify as a REIT, which will reduce the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

 

Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we will be required to pay certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property.  For example, we will be subject to income tax to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including capital gains.  Additionally, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which dividends paid by us in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. Moreover, if we have net income from “prohibited transactions,” that income will be subject to a 100% penalty tax.  In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.  The determination as to whether a particular sale is a prohibited transaction depends on the facts and circumstances related to that sale.  We cannot guarantee that sales of our properties would not be prohibited transactions unless we comply with certain statutory safe-harbor provisions.

 

In addition, any net taxable income earned directly by our taxable REIT subsidiaries, or through entities that are disregarded for federal income tax purposes as entities separate from our taxable REIT subsidiaries, will be subject to federal and possibly state corporate income tax.  We have elected to treat some of our subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries, and we may elect to treat other subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries in the future.  In this regard, several provisions of the laws applicable to REITs and their subsidiaries ensure that a taxable REIT subsidiary will be subject to an appropriate level of federal income taxation.  For example, a taxable REIT subsidiary is limited in its ability to deduct certain interest payments made to an affiliated REIT.  In addition, the REIT has to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments that it receives or on some deductions taken by a taxable REIT subsidiary if the economic arrangements between the REIT, the REIT’s customers, and the taxable REIT subsidiary are not comparable to similar arrangements between unrelated parties.  Finally, some state and local jurisdictions may tax some of our income even though as a REIT we are not subject to federal income tax on that income because not all states and localities follow the federal income tax treatment of REITs.  To the extent that we and our affiliates are required to pay federal, state and local taxes, we will have less cash available for distributions to our shareholders.

 

We face possible federal, state and local tax audits.

 

Because we are organized and qualify as a REIT, we are generally not subject to federal income taxes, but are subject to certain state and local taxes.  Certain entities through which we own real estate either have undergone, or are currently undergoing, tax audits.  Although we believe that we have substantial arguments in favor of our positions in the ongoing audits, in some instances there is no controlling precedent or interpretive guidance on the specific point at issue.  Collectively, tax deficiency notices received to date from the jurisdictions conducting the ongoing audits have not been material.  However, there can be no assurance that future audits will not occur with increased frequency or that the ultimate result of such audits will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

Risks Related to our Debt Financings

 

We face risks related to current debt maturities, including refinancing risk.

 

Certain of our mortgages, bank loans, and unsecured debt will have significant outstanding balances on their maturity dates, commonly known as “balloon payments.”  We may not have the cash resources available to repay those amounts, and we may have to raise funds for such repayment either through the issuance of capital stock, additional borrowings (which may include extension of maturity dates), joint ventures or asset sales.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance the debt on favorable terms or at all.  To the extent we cannot refinance debt on favorable terms or at all, we may be forced to dispose of properties on disadvantageous terms or pay higher interest rates, either of which would have an adverse impact on our financial performance and ability to pay dividends to investors

 

20

Table of Contents

 

As a result of our interest rate hedges, swap agreements and other, similar arrangements, we face counterparty risks.

 

We may be exposed to the potential risk of counterparty default or non-payment with respect to interest rate hedges, swap agreements, floors, caps and other interest rate hedging contracts that we may enter into from time to time, in which event we could suffer a material loss on the value of those agreements.  Although these agreements may lessen the impact of rising interest rates on us, they also expose us to the risk that other parties to the agreements will not perform or that we cannot enforce the agreements.  There is no assurance that our potential counterparties on these agreements are likely to perform their obligations under such agreements.

 

Financing our future growth plan or refinancing existing debt maturities could be impacted by negative capital market conditions.

 

Recently, domestic financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and uncertainty.  Overall liquidity has tightened in the domestic financial markets, including the investment grade debt and equity capital markets for which we historically sought financing.  Consequently, there is greater uncertainty regarding our ability to access the credit markets in order to attract financing on reasonable terms nor can there be any assurance we can issue common or preferred equity securities at a reasonable price.  Our ability to finance new acquisitions and refinance future debt maturities could be adversely impacted by our inability to secure permanent financing on reasonable terms, if at all.

 

The terms and covenants relating to our indebtedness could adversely impact our economic performance.

 

Like other real estate companies that incur debt, we are subject to risks associated with debt financing, such as the insufficiency of cash flow to meet required debt service payment obligations and the inability to refinance existing indebtedness.  If our debt cannot be paid, refinanced or extended at maturity, we may not be able to make distributions to shareholders at expected levels or at all and may not be able to acquire new properties.  Failure to make distributions to our shareholders could result in our failure to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.  Furthermore, an increase in our interest expense could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders.  If we do not meet our debt service obligations, any facilities securing such indebtedness could be foreclosed on, which would have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and ability to make distributions and, depending on the number of facilities foreclosed on, could threaten our continued viability.

 

Our 2011 Credit Facility contains (and any new or amended facility we may enter into from time to time will likely contain) customary affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants that, among other things, require us to comply with certain liquidity and net worth tests.  Our ability to borrow under the 2011 Credit Facility is (and any new or amended facility we may enter into from time to time will be) subject to compliance with such financial and other covenants.  In the event that we fail to satisfy these covenants, we would be in default under the 2011 Credit Facility and may be required to repay such debt with capital from other sources.  Under such circumstances, other sources of debt or equity capital may not be available to us, or may be available only on unattractive terms.  Moreover, the presence of such covenants in our credit agreements could cause us to operate our business with a view toward compliance with such covenants, which might not produce optimal returns for shareholders.

 

Increases in interest rates on variable rate indebtedness would increase our interest expense, which could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders.  Rising interest rates could also restrict our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures.  In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amounts that third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to alter our portfolio promptly in relation to economic or other conditions.

 

Our organizational documents contain no limitation on the amount of debt we may incur.  As a result, we may become highly leveraged in the future.

 

Our organizational documents contain no limitations on the amount of indebtedness that we or our Operating Partnership may incur.  We could alter the balance between our total outstanding indebtedness and the value of our assets at any time.  If we become more highly leveraged, then the resulting increase in debt service could adversely affect our ability to make payments on our outstanding indebtedness and to pay our anticipated distributions and/or the distributions required to maintain our REIT status, and could harm our financial condition.

 

21

Table of Contents

 

Risks Related to our Organization and Structure

 

We are dependent upon our senior management team whose continued service is not guaranteed.

 

Our executive team, including our named executive officers, have extensive self-storage, real estate and public company experience.  Although we have employment agreements with these members of our senior management team, we cannot provide any assurance that any of them will remain in our employment.  The loss of services of one or more members of our senior management team could adversely affect our operations and our future growth.

 

We are dependent upon our on-site personnel to maximize customer satisfaction; any difficulties we encounter in hiring, training and retaining skilled field personnel may adversely affect our rental revenues.

 

As of December 31, 2011, we had 1,083 field personnel involved in the management and operation of our facilities.  The customer service, marketing skills and knowledge of local market demand and competitive dynamics of our facility managers are contributing factors to our ability to maximize our rental income and to achieve the highest sustainable rent levels at each of our facilities.  We compete with various other companies in attracting and retaining qualified and skilled personnel. Competitive pressures may require that we enhance our pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel.  If there is an increase in these costs or if we fail to attract and retain qualified and skilled personnel, our business and operating results could be harmed.

 

Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes in control, which may discourage third parties from conducting a tender offer or seeking other change of control transactions that could involve a premium price for our shares or otherwise benefit our shareholders.

 

Certain provisions of Maryland law may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change of control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our common shares with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of those shares, including:

 

·         “business combination moratorium/fair price” provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested shareholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate thereof) for five years after the most recent date on which the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder, and thereafter imposes stringent fair price and super-majority shareholder voting requirements on these combinations; and

 

·         “control share” provisions that provide that “control shares” of our company (defined as shares which, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the shareholder, entitle the shareholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing Trustees) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of “control shares” from a party other than the issuer) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by our shareholders by the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares, and are subject to redemption in certain circumstances.

 

We have opted out of these provisions of Maryland law.  However, our Board of Trustees may opt to make these provisions applicable to us at any time without shareholder approval.

 

Our Trustees also have the discretion, granted in our bylaws and Maryland law, without shareholder approval to, among other things (1) create a staggered Board of Trustees, and (2) amend our bylaws or repeal individual bylaws in a manner that provides the Board of Trustees with greater authority.  Any such action could inhibit or impede a third party from making a proposal to acquire us at a price that could be beneficial to our shareholders.

 

Our shareholders have limited control to prevent us from making any changes to our investment and financing policies.

 

Our Board of Trustees has adopted policies with respect to certain activities.  These policies may be amended or revised from time to time at the discretion of our Board of Trustees without a vote of our shareholders.  This means that our shareholders have limited control over changes in our policies.  Such changes in our policies intended to improve, expand or diversify our business may not have the anticipated effects and consequently may adversely affect our business and prospects, results of operations and share price.

 

22

Table of Contents

 

Our rights and the rights of our shareholders to take action against our Trustees and officers are limited.

 

Maryland law provides that a trustee or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances.  Our declaration of trust and bylaws require us to indemnify our Trustees and officers for actions taken on behalf of the Company by them in those capacities to the extent permitted by Maryland law.  Accordingly, in the event that actions taken in good faith by any Trustee or officer impede our performance, our shareholders’ ability to recover damages from that Trustee or officer will be limited.

 

Our declaration of trust permits our Board of Trustees to issue preferred shares with terms that may discourage third parties from conducting a tender offer or seeking other change of control transactions that could involve a premium price for our shares or otherwise benefit our shareholders.

 

Our declaration of trust permits our Board of Trustees to issue up to 40,000,000 preferred shares, of which 3,100,000 shares have already been issued, having those preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemption as determined by our Board.  In addition, our Board may reclassify any unissued common shares into one or more classes or series of preferred shares.  Thus, our Board could authorize, without shareholder approval, the issuance of preferred shares with terms and conditions that could have the effect of discouraging a takeover or other transaction in which holders of some or a majority of our shares might receive a premium for their shares over the then-prevailing market price of our shares.  We currently do not expect that the Board would require shareholder approval prior to such a preferred issuance.  In addition, any preferred shares that we issue would rank senior to our common shares with respect to the payment of distributions, in which case we could not pay any distributions on our common shares until full distributions have been paid with respect to such preferred shares.

 

Risks Related to our Securities

 

Additional issuances of equity securities may be dilutive to shareholders.

 

The interests of our shareholders could be diluted if we issue additional equity securities to finance future acquisitions or developments or to repay indebtedness.  Our Board of Trustees may authorize the issuance of additional equity securities, including preferred shares, without shareholder approval.  Our ability to execute our business strategy depends upon our access to an appropriate blend of debt financing, including unsecured lines of credit and other forms of secured and unsecured debt, and equity financing, including the issuance of common and preferred equity.

 

Many factors could have an adverse effect on the market value of our securities.

 

A number of factors might adversely affect the price of our securities, many of which are beyond our control.  These factors include:

 

·                  increases in market interest rates, relative to the dividend yield on our shares.  If market interest rates go up, prospective purchasers of our securities may require a higher yield.  Higher market interest rates would not, however, result in more funds for us to distribute and, to the contrary, would likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for distribution.  Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our equity securities to go down;

 

·                  anticipated benefit of an investment in our securities as compared to investment in securities of companies in other industries (including benefits associated with tax treatment of dividends and distributions);

 

·                  perception by market professionals of REITs generally and REITs comparable to us in particular;

 

·                  level of institutional investor interest in our securities;

 

·                  relatively low trading volumes in securities of REITs;

 

·                  our results of operations and financial condition;

 

23

Table of Contents

 

·                  investor confidence in the stock market generally; and

 

·                  additions and departures of key personnel.

 

The market value of our equity securities is based primarily upon the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions.  Consequently, our equity securities may trade at prices that are higher or lower than our net asset value per equity security.  If our future earnings or cash distributions are less than expected, it is likely that the market price of our equity securities will diminish.

 

The market price of our common shares has been, and may continue to be, particularly volatile, and our shareholders may be unable to resell their shares at a profit.

 

The market price of our common shares has been subject to significant fluctuations and may continue to fluctuate or decline.  Between 2009 and December 31, 2011, our common stock has been particularly volatile as the price of our common stock has ranged from a high of $11.39 to a low of $1.50.  In the past several years, REIT stocks have experienced high levels of volatility and significant declines in value from their historic highs.  Additionally, as a result of the current global credit crisis and the concurrent economic downturn in the U.S. and globally, there have been significant declines in the values of equity securities generally in the U.S. and abroad.

 

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company.  If our stock price is volatile, we may become the target of securities litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources from our business.

 

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

24

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

 

Overview

 

As of December 31, 2011, we owned 370 self-storage facilities located in 26 states and the District of Columbia; and aggregating approximately 24.4 million rentable square feet.  The following table sets forth certain summary information regarding our facilities by state as of December 31, 2011.

 

						Total		% of Total
		Number of		Number of		Rentable		Rentable
State		Facilities		Units		Square Feet		Square Feet		Occupancy
Florida		53		37,244		3,938,456		16.1	%	75.7	%
Texas		45		21,952		2,772,168		11.4	%	79.9	%
California		44		27,261		3,202,117		13.1	%	75.2	%
Illinois		27		13,843		1,607,718		6.6	%	83.6	%
New York		27		25,929		1,744,197		7.1	%	79.3	%
Arizona		24		11,939		1,284,038		5.3	%	79.0	%
Tennessee		24		12,794		1,684,629		6.9	%	78.1	%
Ohio		23		11,854		1,420,533		5.8	%	78.8	%
Connecticut		18		7,945		925,026		3.8	%	82.0	%
New Jersey		16		10,360		1,039,610		4.3	%	75.2	%
New Mexico		9		3385		387,590		1.6	%	81.9	%
Georgia		9		6,026		759,585		3.1	%	77.8	%
Colorado		8		4,070		492,998		2.0	%	81.5	%
Virginia		7		5,271		528,117		2.2	%	80.8	%
North Carolina		6		3,856		462,948		1.9	%	79.2	%
Maryland		5		4,158		518,252		2.1	%	81.0	%
Massachusetts		4		2,383		206,519		0.8	%	77.1	%
Utah		4		2,226		239,723		1.0	%	76.9	%
Louisiana		3		1,411		195,017		0.8	%	79.0	%
Michigan		3		1,499		220,589		0.9	%	74.0	%
Pennsylvania		3		2,151		225,620		0.9	%	81.5	%
Nevada		2		886		97,182		0.4	%	79.3	%
Washington DC		2		1,798		146,101		0.6	%	87.9	%
Wisconsin		1		485		58,500		0.2	%	76.3	%
Indiana		1		710		73,014		0.3	%	82.3	%
Mississippi		1		511		61,251		0.3	%	75.2	%
Alabama		1		793		128,871		0.5	%	73.4	%
Total/Weighted Average		370		222,740		24,420,369		100.0	%	78.4	%

 

Our Facilities

 

The following table sets forth certain additional information with respect to each of our facilities as of December 31, 2011. Our ownership of each facility consists of a fee interest in the facility held by our Operating Partnership, or one of its subsidiaries, except for five of our facilities, which are subject to ground leases.  In addition, small parcels of land at four of our other facilities are subject to ground leases.

 

25

Table of Contents

 

		Year Acquired/		Year		Rentable						Manager		% Climate
Facility Location		Developed (1)		Built		Square Feet		Occupancy (2)		Units		Apartment (3)		Controlled (4)
Mobile, AL †		1997		1974/90		128,871		73.4	%	793		Y		1.2	%
Chandler, AZ		2005		1985		47,545		70.7	%	434		Y		6.9	%
Glendale, AZ		1998		1987		56,850		81.9	%	518		Y		0.0	%
Green Valley, AZ		2005		1985		25,050		61.6	%	255		N		8.0	%
Mesa I, AZ		2006		1985		52,375		82.8	%	482		N		0.0	%
Mesa II, AZ		2006		1981		45,445		83.3	%	386		Y		9.3	%
Mesa III, AZ		2006		1986		58,189		63.7	%	490		Y		4.5	%
Phoenix I, AZ		2006		1987		100,387		86.3	%	747		Y		9.0	%
Phoenix II, AZ		2006		1974		83,340		69.7	%	825		Y		2.6	%
Scottsdale, AZ		1998		1995		80,425		76.2	%	658		Y		9.6	%
Tempe, AZ		2005		1975		53,890		75.2	%	403		Y		13.0	%
Tucson I, AZ		1998		1974		59,350		83.6	%	482		Y		0.0	%
Tucson II, AZ		1998		1988		43,950		82.2	%	530		Y		100.0	%
Tucson III, AZ		2005		1979		49,832		79.3	%	482		Y		0.0	%
Tucson IV, AZ		2005		1982		48,040		80.0	%	481		Y		3.7	%
Tucson V, AZ		2005		1982		45,184		69.8	%	417		Y		3.0	%
Tucson VI, AZ		2005		1982		40,766		81.5	%	410		Y		3.4	%
Tucson VII, AZ		2005		1982		52,688		90.8	%	591		Y		2.0	%
Tucson VIII, AZ		2005		1979		46,600		85.1	%	440		Y		0.0	%
Tucson IX, AZ		2005		1984		67,720		76.7	%	600		Y		1.9	%
Tucson X, AZ		2005		1981		46,350		85.0	%	411		N		0.0	%
Tucson XI, AZ		2005		1974		42,850		86.7	%	409		Y		0.0	%
Tucson XII, AZ		2005		1974		42,325		79.8	%	434		Y		4.8	%
Tucson XIII, AZ		2005		1974		45,792		77.6	%	508		Y		0.0	%
Tucson XIV, AZ		2005		1976		49,095		83.2	%	546		Y		8.8	%
Apple Valley I, CA		1997		1984		73,440		71.2	%	486		Y		0.0	%
Apple Valley II, CA		1997		1988		61,555		73.7	%	445		Y		5.3	%
Benicia, CA		2005		1988/93/05		74,770		86.9	%	739		Y		0.0	%
Cathedral City, CA †		2006		1982/92		109,239		67.3	%	660		Y		2.3	%
Citrus Heights, CA		2005		1987		75,620		75.3	%	664		Y		0.0	%
Diamond Bar, CA		2005		1988		103,034		80.4	%	898		Y		0.0	%
Escondido, CA		2007		2002		142,870		83.1	%	1,228		Y		6.5	%
Fallbrook, CA		1997		1985/88		46,620		81.5	%	446		Y		0.0	%
Lancaster, CA		2001		1987		60,675		71.1	%	328		N		0.0	%
Long Beach, CA		2006		1974		125,091		63.3	%	1,350		Y		0.0	%
Murrieta, CA		2005		1996		49,835		88.1	%	421		Y		2.9	%
North Highlands, CA		2005		1980		57,244		77.1	%	467		Y		0.0	%
Orangevale, CA		2005		1980		50,317		79.1	%	529		Y		0.0	%
Palm Springs I, CA		2006		1989		72,675		70.6	%	548		Y		0.0	%
Palm Springs II, CA †		2006		1982/89		122,250		63.2	%	588		Y		8.5	%
Pleasanton, CA		2005		2003		85,045		88.6	%	691		Y		0.0	%
Rancho Cordova, CA		2005		1979		53,978		79.1	%	459		Y		0.0	%
Rialto I, CA		1997		1987		57,411		74.8	%	453		Y		0.0	%
Rialto II, CA		2006		1980		99,803		78.9	%	717		N		0.0	%
Riverside I, CA		2006		1977		67,120		82.1	%	629		Y		0.0	%
Riverside II, CA		2006		1985		85,166		61.0	%	815		Y		3.9	%
Roseville, CA		2005		1979		59,869		80.3	%	546		Y		0.0	%
Sacramento I, CA		2005		1979		50,664		77.7	%	543		Y		0.0	%
Sacramento II, CA		2005		1986		61,888		67.4	%	550		Y		0.0	%
San Bernardino I, CA		1997		1987		31,070		77.5	%	231		N		0.0	%
San Bernardino II, CA		1997		1991		41,546		74.4	%	375		Y		0.0	%
San Bernardino III, CA		1997		1985/92		35,446		74.9	%	382		N		0.0	%
San Bernardino IV, CA		2005		2002/04		83,307		71.4	%	705		Y		11.6	%
San Bernardino V, CA		2006		1974		56,795		60.9	%	483		Y		4.2	%
San Bernardino VI, CA		2006		1975		103,530		60.3	%	876		Y		0.0	%
San Bernardino VII, CA		2006		1978		78,729		86.4	%	607		Y		1.3	%
San Bernardino VIII, CA		2006		1977		94,529		66.5	%	838		Y		0.0	%
San Marcos, CA		2005		1979		37,430		85.9	%	242		Y		0.0	%
Santa Ana, CA		2006		1984		64,071		76.1	%	714		Y		2.3	%
South Sacramento, CA		2005		1979		52,165		72.1	%	415		Y		0.0	%
Spring Valley, CA		2006		1980		55,045		79.8	%	713		Y		0.0	%
Temecula I, CA		1998		1985/2003		81,550		76.2	%	691		Y		46.5	%
Temecula II, CA		2006		2003		84,398		78.9	%	630		Y		51.3	%
Thousand Palms, CA		2006		1988/01		75,345		68.9	%	699		Y		26.9	%
Vista I, CA		2001		1988		74,405		85.6	%	618		Y		0.0	%
Vista II, CA		2005		2001/02/03		147,981		78.7	%	1,270		Y		2.3	%
Walnut, CA		2005		1987		50,708		83.3	%	536		Y		9.2	%
West Sacramento, CA		2005		1984		39,790		77.6	%	478		Y		0.0	%
Westminster, CA		2005		1983/98		68,098		80.4	%	558		Y		0.0	%
Aurora, CO		2005		1981		75,827		79.9	%	598		Y		0.0	%
Colorado Springs I, CO		2005		1986		47,975		78.1	%	461		Y		0.0	%
Colorado Springs II, CO		2006		2001		62,300		86.8	%	430		Y		0.0	%
Denver, CO		2006		1997		59,200		78.0	%	449		Y		0.0	%

 

26