DORCHESTER MINERALS, L.P. - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 or 15 (d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Or
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION
13 or 15 (d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from __________ to __________
For
the Quarterly Period Ended June 30,
2008
|
Commission
file number
000-50175
|
DORCHESTER
MINERALS, L.P.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State
or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation
or organization)
|
81-0551518
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
3838
Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75219
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (214)
559-0300
None
Former
name, former address and former fiscal
year, if
changed since last report
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of "large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer x | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do
not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.): Yes
o No x
As of
August 7, 2008, 28,240,431 common units of partnership interest were
outstanding.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
3
|
||
|
3
|
||
ITEM
1.
|
|
3
|
|
4
|
|||
AND
SIX MONTHS MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 AND 2007
(UNAUDITED)
|
5
|
||
|
6
|
||
|
7
|
||
ITEM
2.
|
|
8
|
|
ITEM
3.
|
|
13
|
|
ITEM
4
|
|
14
|
|
|
14
|
||
ITEM
1.
|
|
14
|
|
ITEM
1A.
|
|
14
|
|
ITEM
2.
|
|
14
|
|
ITEM
3.
|
|
14
|
|
ITEM
4.
|
|
14
|
|
ITEM
5.
|
|
14
|
|
ITEM
6.
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
||
|
16
|
||
17
|
2
Statements
included in this report that are not historical facts (including any statements
concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic
performance, or assumptions or forecasts related thereto), are forward-looking
statements. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking
terminology including “may,” “believe,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,”
“estimate,” “continue” or other similar words. These statements discuss future
expectations, contain projections of results of operations or of financial
condition or state other “forward-looking” information. In this report, the term
“Partnership,” as well as the terms “DMLP,” “us,” “our,” “we,” and “its” are
sometimes used as abbreviated references to Dorchester Minerals, L.P. itself or
Dorchester Minerals, L.P. and its related entities.
These
forward-looking statements are based upon management’s current plans,
expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events
impacting us and, therefore, involve a number of risks and uncertainties. We
caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual
results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the
forward-looking statements for a number of important reasons. Examples of such
reasons include, but are not limited to, changes in the price or demand for oil
and natural gas, changes in the operations on or development of our properties,
changes in economic and industry conditions and changes in regulatory
requirements (including changes in environmental requirements) and our financial
position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future
operations. These and other factors are set forth in our filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
You
should read these statements carefully because they discuss our expectations
about our future performance, contain projections of our future operating
results or our future financial condition, or state other “forward-looking”
information. Before you invest, you should be aware that the occurrence of any
of the events described in this report could substantially harm our business,
results of operations and financial condition and that upon the occurrence of
any of these events, the trading price of our common units could decline, and
you could lose all or part of your investment.
See
attached financial statements on the following pages.
3
DORCHESTER
MINERALS, L.P.
(A
Delaware Limited Partnership)
(In
Thousands)
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 23,175 | $ | 15,001 | ||||
Trade
receivables
|
11,066 | 7,053 | ||||||
Net
profits interests receivable - related party
|
6,116 | 3,576 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
25 | - | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
40,382 | 25,630 | ||||||
Other
non-current assets
|
19 | 19 | ||||||
Total
|
19 | 19 | ||||||
Property
and leasehold improvements - at cost:
|
||||||||
Oil
and natural gas properties (full cost method)
|
291,818 | 291,830 | ||||||
Less
accumulated full cost depletion
|
170,996 | 163,582 | ||||||
Total
|
120,822 | 128,248 | ||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
512 | 512 | ||||||
Less
accumulated amortization
|
182 | 158 | ||||||
Total
|
330 | 354 | ||||||
Net
property and leasehold improvements
|
121,152 | 128,602 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 161,553 | $ | 154,251 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and other current liabilities
|
$ | 926 | $ | 517 | ||||
Current
portion of deferred rent incentive
|
39 | 39 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
965 | 556 | ||||||
Deferred
rent incentive less current portion
|
227 | 248 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
1,192 | 804 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Partnership
capital:
|
||||||||
General
partner
|
6,575 | 6,417 | ||||||
Unitholders
|
153,786 | 147,030 | ||||||
Total
partnership capital
|
160,361 | 153,447 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and partnership capital
|
$ | 161,553 | $ | 154,251 |
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
DORCHESTER
MINERALS, L.P.
(A
Delaware Limited Partnership)
(In
Thousands except Earnings per Unit)
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||
Operating
revenues:
|
|||||||||||||||
Royalties
|
$ | 18,604 | $ | 11,113 | $ | 33,375 | $ |
20,782
|
|||||||
Net
profits interests
|
10,204 | 6,257 | 16,569 | 11,201 | |||||||||||
Lease
bonus
|
140 | 224 | 257 | 317 | |||||||||||
Other
|
40 | 19 | 59 | 27 | |||||||||||
Total
operating revenues
|
28,988 | 17,613 | 50,260 | 32,327 | |||||||||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating,
including production taxes
|
1,345 | 1,023 | 2,536 | 1,991 | |||||||||||
Depletion
and amortization
|
3,648 | 3,873 | 7,438 | 7,694 | |||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
860 | 767 | 1,871 | 1,710 | |||||||||||
Total
costs and expenses
|
5,853 | 5,663 | 11,845 | 11,395 | |||||||||||
Operating
income
|
23,135 | 11,950 | 38,415 | 20,932 | |||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
31 | 132 | 161 | 273 | |||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 23,166 | $ | 12,082 | $ | 38,576 | $ | 21,205 | |||||||
Allocation
of net earnings:
|
|||||||||||||||
General
partner
|
$ | 662 | $ | 341 | $ | 1,125 | $ | 601 | |||||||
Unitholders
|
$ | 22,504 | $ | 11,741 | $ | 37,451 | $ | 20,604 | |||||||
Net
earnings per common unit (basic and diluted)
|
$ | 0.80 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 1.33 | $ | 0.73 | |||||||
Weighted
average common units outstanding
|
28,240 | 28,240 | 28,240 | 28,240 |
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
DORCHESTER
MINERALS, L.P.
(A
Delaware Limited Partnership)
(In
Thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months
Ended
|
||||||||
June 30,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
$ | 39,886 | $ | 27,908 | ||||
Cash
flows (used in) provided by investing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from related party note receivable
|
- | 26 | ||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(50 | ) | - | |||||
Total
cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(50 | ) | 26 | |||||
Cash
flows used in financing activities:
|
||||||||
Distributions
paid to general partner and unitholders
|
(31,662 | ) | (27,324 | ) | ||||
Increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
8,174 | 610 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
15,001 | 13,927 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 23,175 | $ | 14,537 |
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
DORCHESTER
MINERALS, L.P.
(A
Delaware Limited Partnership)
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of
Presentation:
Dorchester Minerals, L.P. is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership that
was formed in December 2001, and commenced operations on January 31,
2003. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Dorchester Minerals, L.P., Dorchester Minerals Oklahoma LP, Dorchester Minerals
Oklahoma GP, Inc., Dorchester Minerals Acquisition LP, and Dorchester Minerals
Acquisition GP, Inc. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting
only of normal and recurring adjustments unless indicated otherwise) that are,
in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of our
financial position and operating results for the interim period. Interim period
results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the calendar year. See
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” for additional information. Per-unit information is calculated by
dividing the earnings or loss applicable to holders of our Partnership’s common
units by the weighted average number of units outstanding. The Partnership has
no potentially dilutive securities and, consequently, basic and dilutive
earnings or loss per unit do not differ.
2. Contingencies:
In January 2002, some individuals and an association called Rural Residents for
Natural Gas Rights sued Dorchester Hugoton, Ltd., along with several other
operators in Texas County, Oklahoma regarding the use of natural gas from the
wells in residences. Dorchester Minerals Operating LP, the operating
partnership, now owns and operates the properties formerly owned by Dorchester
Hugoton. These properties contribute a major portion of the Net Profits
Interests amounts paid to us. On April 9, 2007, plaintiffs, for immaterial
costs, dismissed with prejudice all claims against the operating partnership
regarding such residential gas use. On October 4, 2004, the
plaintiffs filed severed claims against the operating partnership regarding
royalty underpayments, which the Texas County District Court subsequently
dismissed with a grant of time to replead. On January 27, 2006, one
of the original plaintiffs again sued the operating partnership for underpayment
of royalty, seeking class action certification. On October 1, 2007,
the Texas County District Court granted the operating partnership’s motion for
summary judgment finding no royalty underpayments. Subsequently, the
District Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, and on January
7, 2008, the plaintiff filed an appeal. On March 3, 2008, the appeal
was dismissed by the Oklahoma Supreme Court pending disposition by the District
Court of unresolved related claims. On June 23, 2008, the operating
partnership dismissed, without prejudice, its counterclaim. Other
unresolved claims are still pending at the District Court. An adverse
appellate decision could reduce amounts we receive from the Net Profits
Interests.
The
Partnership and the operating partnership are involved in other legal and/or
administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of their businesses,
none of which have predictable outcomes and none of which are believed to have
any significant effect on consolidated financial position, cash flows, or
operating results.
3. Distributions
to Holders of Common Units: Since commencing operations on
January 31, 2003, unitholder cash distributions per common unit have
been:
Per
Unit Amount
|
||||||||||||
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
|||||||
First
quarter
|
$0.206469
|
$0.415634
|
$0.481242
|
$0.729852
|
$0.461146
|
$0.572300
|
||||||
Second
quarter
|
$0.458087
|
$0.415315
|
$0.514542
|
$0.778120
|
$0.473745
|
$0.769206
|
||||||
Third
quarter
|
$0.422674
|
$0.476196
|
$0.577287
|
$0.516082
|
$0.560502
|
|||||||
Fourth
quarter
|
$0.391066
|
$0.426076
|
$0.805543
|
$0.478596
|
$0.514625
|
Distributions
beginning with the third quarter of 2004 were paid on 28,240,431 units; previous
distributions were paid on 27,040,431 units. Fourth quarter
distributions shown above are paid in the first calendar quarter of the
following year. Our partnership agreement requires the next cash
distribution to be paid by November 15, 2008.
7
4. New
Accounting Pronouncements: In September 2006, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework to measure
assets and liabilities, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. This statement applies whenever other statements
require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. SFAS 157
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, except for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value in financial statements on a recurring basis, for which application has
been deferred for one year. We adopted SFAS 157 in the first quarter
of 2008 with no material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Overview
We own
producing and nonproducing mineral, royalty, overriding royalty, net profits and
leasehold interests. We refer to these interests as the Royalty Properties. We
currently own Royalty Properties in 573 counties and parishes in 25
states.
Dorchester
Minerals Operating LP, a Delaware limited partnership owned directly and
indirectly by our general partner, holds working interest properties and a minor
portion of mineral and royalty interest properties. We refer to Dorchester
Minerals Operating LP as the “operating partnership” or “DMOLP.” We directly and
indirectly own a 96.97% net profits overriding royalty interest in property
groups made up of four NPIs created when we commenced operations in 2003. We
refer to our net profits overriding royalty interest in these property groups as
the Net Profits Interests. We currently receive monthly payments equaling 96.97%
of the preceding month’s net profits actually realized by the operating
partnership from three of the property groups. The purpose of such
Net Profits Interests is to avoid the participation as a working interest or
other cost-bearing owner that could result in unrelated business taxable
income. Net profits interest payments are not considered unrelated
business taxable income for tax purposes. One such Net Profits
Interest, referred to as the Minerals NPI, has continuously had costs that
exceed revenues. As of June 30, 2008, cumulative operating and
development costs presented in the following table, which include amounts
equivalent to an interest charge, exceeded cumulative revenues of the Minerals
NPI, resulting in a cumulative deficit. All cumulative deficits (which represent
cumulative excess of operating and development costs over revenue received) are
borne 100% by our general partner until the Minerals NPI recovers the deficit
amount. Once in profit status, we will receive the Net Profits Interest payments
attributable to these properties. Our consolidated financial statements do not
reflect activity attributable to properties subject to Net Profits Interests
that are in a deficit status. Consequently, net profits interest
payments and production sales volumes and prices set forth in other portions of
this quarterly report do not reflect amounts attributable to the Minerals NPI,
which includes all of the operating partnership’s Fayetteville Shale working
interest properties in Arkansas.
The
following table sets forth cash receipts and disbursements attributable to the
Minerals NPI:
Minerals
NPI Cash Basis Results
(in
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Cumulative
Total
at
12/31/07
|
Six
Months
Ended
6/30/08
|
Cumulative
Total
at
6/30/08
|
||||||||||
Cash
received for revenue
|
$ | 8,200 | $ | 2,253 | $ | 10,453 | ||||||
Cash
paid for operating costs
|
1,373 | 326 | 1,699 | |||||||||
Cash
paid for development costs
|
6,946 | 2,404 | 9,350 | |||||||||
Net
cash paid
|
$ | (119 | ) | $ | (477 | ) | $ | (596 | ) | |||
Cumulative
NPI deficit
|
$ | (119 | ) | $ | (596 | ) | $ | (596 | ) |
The
development costs pertain to more properties than the properties producing
revenue due to timing differences between operating partnership expenditures and
oil and natural gas production and payments to the operating
partnership. Amounts in the above table include budgeted capital
expenditures of $1,152,000 at June 30, 2008. The amounts also reflect
the operating partnership’s ownership of the subject properties. Net
Profits Interest payments to us, if any, will equal 96.97% of the cumulative net
profits actually received by the operating partnership attributable to subject
properties. The above financial information attributable to the
Minerals NPI may not be indicative of future results of the Minerals NPI and may
not indicate when the deficit status may end and when Net Profits Interest
payments may begin from the Minerals NPI.
8
Commodity
Price Risks
Our
profitability is affected by volatility in prevailing oil and natural gas
prices. Oil and natural gas prices have been subject to significant volatility
in recent years in response to changes in the supply and demand for oil and
natural gas in the market along with domestic and international political
economic conditions.
Results
of Operations
Three
and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 as compared to Three and Six Months Ended
June 30, 2007
Normally,
our period-to-period changes in net earnings and cash flows from operating
activities are principally determined by changes in oil and natural gas sales
volumes and prices. Our portion of oil and natural gas sales and weighted
average prices were:
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
March
31,
|
June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
Accrual
basis sales volumes:
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
|||||||||||||
Royalty
properties gas sales (mmcf)
|
872 | 838 | 992 | 1,864 | 1,696 | ||||||||||||||
Royalty
properties oil sales (mbbls)
|
80 | 79 | 72 | 152 | 153 | ||||||||||||||
Net
profits interests gas sales (mmcf)
|
974 | 1,035 | 987 | 1,961 | 2,051 | ||||||||||||||
Net
profits interests oil sales (mbbls)
|
3 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
Accrual
basis weighted average sales price:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Royalty
properties gas sales ($/mcf)
|
$ | 10.73 | $ | 7.71 | $ | 7.96 | $ | 9.26 | $ | 7.15 | |||||||||
Royalty
properties oil sales ($/bbl)
|
$ | 116.43 | $ | 59.13 | $ | 94.88 | $ | 106.14 | $ | 56.58 | |||||||||
Net
profits interests gas sales ($/mcf)
|
$ | 11.90 | $ | 7.82 | $ | 8.04 | $ | 9.96 | $ | 7.28 | |||||||||
Net
profits interests oil sales ($/bbl)
|
$ | 116.81 | $ | 56.62 | $ | 80.10 | $ | 98.18 | $ | 51.66 | |||||||||
Accrual
basis production costs deducted
|
|||||||||||||||||||
under
the net profits interests ($/mcfe)
(1)
|
$ | 1.94 | $ | 2.06 | $ | 1.99 | $ | 1.96 | $ | 2.07 |
|
(1)
|
Provided to
assist in determination of revenues; applies only to Net Profits Interest
sales volumes and prices.
|
Oil sales
volumes attributable to our Royalty Properties during the second quarter were
virtually unchanged at 79 mbbls in 2007 compared to 80 mbbls in 2008. Oil sales
volumes attributable to our Royalty Properties during the first six months were
also virtually unchanged at 153 mbbls in 2007 compared to 152 mbbls in 2008.
Natural gas sales volumes attributable to our Royalty Properties during the
second quarter increased 4.1% from 838 mmcf in 2007 to 872 mmcf in 2008. Natural
gas sales volumes attributable to our Royalty Properties during the first six
months increased 9.9% from 1,696 in 2007 to 1,864 mmcf in 2008. The increases in
natural gas sales volumes were primarily attributable to weather-related
problems that negatively affected production in the first quarter and portions
of the second quarter of 2007.
Oil sales
volumes attributable to our Net Profits Interests during the second quarter and
first six months of 2008 were virtually unchanged when compared to the same
periods of 2007. Natural gas sales volumes attributable to our Net
Profits Interests during the second quarter and first six months of 2008
decreased from the same periods of 2007. Second quarter sales of 974
mmcf during 2008 were 5.9% less than 1,035 mmcf during 2007. First
six month sales of 1,961 mmcf during 2008 were 4.4% less than 2,051 mmcf during
2007. Both natural gas sales volume decreases were a result of
natural reservoir decline. Production sales volumes and prices from
the Minerals NPI are excluded from the above table. See “Overview”
above.
Weighted
average oil sales prices attributable to our interest in Royalty Properties
increased 96.9% from $59.13/bbl during the second quarter of 2007 to $116.43/bbl
during the second quarter of 2008 and increased 87.6% from $56.58/bbl during the
first six months of 2007 to $106.14/bbl during the same period of
2008. Second quarter weighted average natural gas sales prices from
Royalty Properties increased 39.2% from $7.71/mcf during 2007 to $10.73/mcf
during 2008. The six months ended June 30 weighted average Royalty
Properties natural gas sales prices increased 29.5% from $7.15/mcf during 2007
to $9.26/mcf during 2008. Both oil and natural gas price changes
resulted from changing market conditions.
Second
quarter weighted average oil sales prices from the Net Profits Interests’
properties increased 106.3% from $56.62/bbl in 2007 to $116.81/bbl in
2008. The first six months Net Profits Interests’ oil sales prices
increased 90.1% from $51.66/bbl in 2007 to $98.18/bbl in
2008. Changing market conditions resulted in increased oil
prices. Weighted average natural gas sales prices attributable to the
Net Profits Interests increased during the second quarter of 2008 compared to
the same period of 2007 and increased from the first six months of 2007 to the
same period of 2008. Second quarter natural gas sales prices of
$11.90/mcf
9
in 2008
were 52.2% more than $7.82/mcf in 2007. The six months ended June 30,
2008 natural gas prices increased 36.8% to $9.96/mcf from $7.28/mcf in the same
period of 2007. Natural gas sales price increases during the three
and six month periods resulted from changing market conditions plus a natural
gas liquid payment received in 2008 that related to prior year
production. The natural gas liquids payment is based on an Oklahoma
Guymon-Hugoton field 1994 gas delivery agreement that is in effect through
2015. Under the terms of the agreement when the market price of
natural gas liquids increases sufficiently disproportionately to natural gas
market prices, the operating partnership receives a portion of that increase in
an annual payment. We will accrue such payment at the end of each
annual contract period. Only immaterial amounts were received prior
to 2007.
In an
effort to provide the reader with information concerning prices of oil and
natural gas sales that correspond to our quarterly distributions, management
calculates the weighted average price by dividing gross revenues received by the
net volumes of the corresponding product without regard to the timing of the
production to which such sales may be attributable. This “indicated
price” does not necessarily reflect the contract terms for such sales and may be
affected by transportation costs, location differentials, and quality and
gravity adjustments. While the relationship between our cash receipts and the
timing of the production of oil and natural gas may be described generally,
actual cash receipts may be materially impacted by purchasers’ release of
suspended funds and by purchasers’ prior period adjustments.
Cash
receipts attributable to our Royalty Properties during the 2008 second quarter
totaled $14,842,000. These receipts generally reflect oil sales during March
through May 2008 and natural gas sales during February through April
2008. The weighted average indicated prices for oil and natural gas
sales during the 2008 second quarter attributable to the Royalty Properties were
$103.92/bbl and $8.54/mcf, respectively.
Cash
receipts attributable to our Net Profits Interests during the 2008 second
quarter totaled $8,619,000. These receipts reflect oil and natural gas sales
from the properties underlying the Net Profits Interests generally during
February through April 2008 and include a payment received by the operating
partnership during May 2008 attributable to 2007 natural gas liquids in the
Oklahoma Guymon-Hugoton field, which increased the weighted average price by
$1.90/mcf. The weighted average indicated prices received during the
2008 second quarter for oil and natural gas sales, including the natural gas
liquids payment, were $94.16/bbl and $10.58/mcf, respectively.
Our
second quarter net operating revenues increased 64.6% from $17,613,000 during
2007 to $28,988,000 during 2008. Net operating revenues for the first
six months of 2008 increased 55.5% from $32,327,000 during 2007 to $50,260,000
during 2008. Both the quarterly and six month increase resulted from increased
gas and oil sales prices including a 2007 natural gas liquid payment received
during the second quarter 2008.
Costs and
expenses increased 3.4% from $5,663,000 during the second quarter of 2007 to
$5,853,000 during the second quarter of 2008, while six months ended June 30
costs and expenses increased 3.9% from $11,395,000 during 2007 to $11,845,000
during 2008. Such increases primarily resulted from increased
production tax on higher operating revenues.
Depletion
and amortization decreased 5.8% during the second quarter ended June 30, 2008
and 3.3% during the six months ended June 30, 2008 when compared to the same
periods of 2007. The decreases from $3,873,000 and $7,694,000 during
the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, to
$3,648,000 and $7,438,000 during the same periods of 2008 respectively, resulted
from a lower depletable base due to effects of previous depletion and upward
revisions in oil and natural gas reserve estimates at 2007 year
end.
Second
quarter net earnings allocable to common units increased 91.7% from
$11,741,000 during 2007 to $22,504,000 during 2008. First six months
common unit net earnings increased 81.8% from $20,604,000 during 2007 to
$37,451,000 during 2008. The 2008 increase from the second quarter
2007 and the first six months 2007 net earnings is primarily the result of
increased oil and natural gas sales prices.
Net cash
provided by operating activities increased 60.4% from $14,143,000 during
the second quarter of 2007 to $22,683,000 during the second quarter of 2008 and
increased 42.9% from $27,908,000 for the first six months during 2007 to
$39,886,000 during the same period of 2008. Increases in both periods
are primarily due to increased oil and natural gas sales prices along with
abnormal natural gas liquid payments. See discussion above on net
operating revenues for more details.
We
received cash payments in the amount of $268,000 from various sources during the
second quarter of 2008 including lease bonuses attributable to 17 consummated
leases and pooling elections located in 8 counties and parishes in two states.
The consummated leases reflected royalty terms ranging up to 25% and lease
bonuses ranging up to $500/acre.
10
We
received division orders for, or otherwise identified, 122 new wells completed
on our Royalty Properties and Net Profits Interests located in 49 counties and
parishes in eight states during the second quarter of 2008. The operating
partnership elected to participate in 14 wells to be drilled on our Net Profits
Interests located in five counties in two states. Selected new wells and the
royalty interests owned by us and the working and net revenue interests owned by
the operating partnership are summarized in the following table.
This
table does not include wells drilled in the Fayetteville Shale trend as they are
detailed in a subsequent discussion and table.
County
|
DMLP
|
DMOLP
|
Test Rates per day
|
||||||||
State
|
/Parish
|
Operator
|
Well Name
|
NRI(2)
|
WI(1)
|
NRI(2)
|
Gas, mcf
|
Oil, bbls
|
|||
AR
|
Logan
|
Highland
Oil & Gas
|
Gregory
#1
|
0.000%
|
6.250%
|
6.250%
|
1,025
|
--
|
|||
LA
|
Bienville
|
El
Paso E & P Co.
|
Poole
A #3 Alt
|
0.878%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
3,182
|
7
|
|||
LA
|
De
Soto
|
Comstock
Oil & Gas
|
Crews,
Lena #3 Alt
|
2.734%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
2,041
|
--
|
|||
ND
|
Mountrail
|
EOG
Resources
|
Risan
#1-34A
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
1.046%
|
308
|
817
|
|||
OK
|
Ellis
|
Crusader
Energy
|
Raiders
#4-27H
|
0.000%
|
3.750%
|
9.063%
|
732
|
192
|
|||
TX
|
Hidalgo
|
El
Paso E & P Co.
|
Coates
A #38
|
6.423%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
1,821
|
--
|
|||
TX
|
Starr
|
Ascent
Operating
|
Garza
Hitchcock #13
|
2.653%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
2,260
|
--
|
|||
TX
|
Starr
|
El
Paso E & P Co.
|
Guerra
– USA GU “D” #15
|
8.194%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
2,088
|
--
|
|||
TX
|
Val
Verde
|
TEMA
Oil and Gas Co.
|
Meadows
#1107
|
0.000%
|
12.383%
|
12.383%
|
391
|
--
|
|||
TX
|
Val
Verde
|
Noble
Energy
|
R N
Byers #2305
|
3.125%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
1,362
|
18
|
|
(1)
|
WI
means the working interest owned by the operating partnership and subject
to a Net Profits Interest.
|
|
(2)
|
NRI
means the net revenue interest attributable to our royalty interest or to
the operating partnership’s royalty and working interest, which is subject
to a Net Profits Interest.
|
FAYETTEVILLE
SHALE TREND OF NORTHERN ARKANSAS -- We own varying undivided perpetual mineral
interests totaling 23,336/11,464 gross/net acres located in Cleburne, Conway,
Faulkner, Franklin, Johnson, Pope, Van Buren, and White counties, Arkansas in an
area commonly referred to as the “Fayetteville Shale” trend of the Arkoma
Basin. Ninety-four wells have been permitted on the lands as of
June 30, 2008. Wells that have been proposed to be drilled
by the operator but for which permits have not yet been issued by the Arkansas
Oil & Gas Commission are not reflected in this number. Available
test results for wells completed in the second quarter, along with ownership
interests owned by us and interests owned by the operating partnership subject
to the Minerals NPI, are summarized in the following table.
DMLP
|
DMOLP
|
Gas
Test Rates
|
||||||||
County
|
Operator
|
Well Name
|
NRI(2)
|
WI(1)
|
NRI(2)
|
mcf per day
|
||||
Conway
|
Petrohawk
|
Morrow
8-15 #1-30H
|
1.875%
|
5.000%
|
5.000%
|
516
|
||||
Conway
|
SEECO
|
Green
Bay Packaging 9-15 #1-19H
|
0.059%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
3,216
|
||||
Conway
|
SEECO
|
Green
Bay Packaging 9-15 #2-19H
|
0.059%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
5,453
|
||||
Conway
|
SEECO
|
Deltic
Timber 9-16 #1-25H
|
1.563%
|
1.250%
|
0.938%
|
1,629
|
||||
Conway
|
SEECO
|
Deltic
Timber 9-16 #2-25H
|
1.563%
|
1.250%
|
0.938%
|
1,207
|
||||
Conway
|
SEECO
|
Jerome
Carr 9-15 #3-31H
|
2.189%
|
3.796%
|
2.847%
|
3,847
|
||||
Faulkner
|
Petrohawk
|
Jolly
8-12 #1-9H
|
0.977%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
--
|
||||
Van
Buren
|
Chesapeake
|
Douglas
Krahn 11-13 #1-5H
|
0.478%
|
0.383%
|
0.287%
|
204
|
||||
Van
Buren
|
Petrohawk
|
Lewis
11-13 #3-30H
|
0.684%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
513
|
||||
Van
Buren
|
Petrohawk
|
Smith
11-13 #1-30H
|
0.684%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
--
|
||||
Van
Buren
|
SEECO
|
Howard
Family Trust 10-12 #1-9H
|
2.344%
|
4.375%
|
3.281%
|
2,574
|
||||
Van
Buren
|
SEECO
|
Breeding
9-13 #2-25H
|
0.781%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
2,738
|
||||
Van
Buren
|
SEECO
|
Breeding
9-13 #1-25H
|
0.781%
|
0.000%
|
0.000%
|
2,601
|
||||
Van
Buren
|
SEECO
|
Crow
10-15 #4-28H33
|
0.000%
|
5.276%
|
5.259%
|
2,882
|
||||
Van
Buren
|
SEECO
|
Handy
10-12 #2-18H
|
2.656%
|
5.000%
|
3.750%
|
3,328
|
|
(1)
|
WI
means the working interest owned by the operating partnership and subject
to the Minerals NPI.
|
|
(2)
|
NRI
means the net revenue interest attributable to our royalty interest or to
the operating partnership’s royalty and working interest, which is subject
to the Minerals NPI.
|
11
Set forth
below is a summary of all permitting, drilling and completion activity through
June 30, 2008 for wells in which we have a royalty or net profits
interest. This includes wells subject to the Minerals NPI, which is
currently in a deficit status.
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
Q1
2007
|
Q2
2007
|
Q3
2007
|
Q4
2007
|
Q1
2008
|
Q2
2008
|
Total
|
||||||||||
New
Well Permits
|
1
|
2
|
11
|
4
|
9
|
12
|
11
|
18
|
26
|
94
|
|||||||||
Wells
Spud
|
0
|
1
|
9
|
4
|
7
|
9
|
13
|
12
|
18
|
73
|
|||||||||
Wells
Completed
|
0
|
1
|
5
|
2
|
4
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
15
|
54
|
|||||||||
Wells
in Pay Status (1)
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
6
|
4
|
7
|
26
|
|
(1)
|
Wells
in pay status means wells for which revenue was initially received during
the indicated period.
|
Net cash
receipts for the Royalty Properties attributable to interests in these lands
totaled $303,000 in the first quarter from 11 wells and $369,000 in the second
quarter from 18 wells. Net cash receipts for the Minerals NPI
Properties attributable to interests in these lands totaled $263,000 and
$338,000 in the first and second quarters, respectively.
APPALACHIAN
BASIN — We own varying undivided perpetual mineral interests in approximately
31,000/22,000 gross/net acres in 19 counties in southern New York and northern
Pennsylvania. Approximately 75% of these net acres are located in
eastern Allegany and western Steuben Counties in New York, an area which some
industry press reports suggest may be prospective for gas production from
unconventional reservoirs including the Marcellus Shale. We
circulated a Request for Proposal to industry participants in May, 2008 to
solicit expressions of interest to lease or jointly develop our interests in
this area. As of July 29, 2008, we have not received any
proposals. We will continue to monitor industry activity and
encourage dialogue with industry participants to determine the proper course of
action regarding our interests.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Capital
Resources
Our
primary sources of capital are our cash flow from the Net Profits Interests and
the Royalty Properties. Our only cash requirements are the distributions to our
unitholders, the payment of oil and natural gas production and property taxes
not otherwise deducted from gross production revenues and general and
administrative expenses incurred on our behalf and allocated in accordance with
our partnership agreement. Since the distributions to our unitholders are, by
definition, determined after the payment of all expenses actually paid by us,
the only cash requirements that may create liquidity concerns for us are the
payments of expenses. Since most of these expenses vary directly with oil and
natural gas sales prices and volumes, we anticipate that sufficient funds will
be available at all times for payment of these expenses. See Note 3 of the Notes
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the amounts and dates of
cash distributions to unitholders.
We are
not directly liable for the payment of any exploration, development or
production costs. We do not have any transactions, arrangements or other
relationships that could materially affect our liquidity or the availability of
capital resources. We have not guaranteed the debt of any other party, nor do we
have any other arrangements or relationships with other entities that could
potentially result in unconsolidated debt.
Pursuant
to the terms of our partnership agreement, we cannot incur indebtedness, other
than trade payables, (i) in excess of $50,000 in the aggregate at any given time
or (ii) which would constitute “acquisition indebtedness” (as defined in Section
514 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended).
Expenses
and Capital Expenditures
The
operating partnership has drilled and completed a well in the Oklahoma Council
Grove formation at a cost of approximately $440,000. The well was
connected to a gas sales pipeline during the second quarter of 2008 and is
currently producing 75 mcf per day.
The
operating partnership plans to continue its efforts to increase production in
Oklahoma with techniques that may include fracture treating, deepening,
recompleting, and replacing existing wells. Based on prior efforts,
costs vary widely and are not predictable as each effort requires specific
engineering. Such activities by the operating partnership could
influence the amount we receive from the Net Profits Interests as reflected in
the accrual basis production costs $/mcfe in the table under “Results of
Operations.”
The
operating partnership owns and operates the wells, pipelines and natural gas
compression and dehydration facilities located in Kansas and Oklahoma. The
operating partnership anticipates gradual
12
increases
in expenses as repairs to these facilities become more frequent and anticipates
gradual increases in field operating expenses as reservoir pressure declines.
The operating partnership does not anticipate incurring significant expense to
replace these facilities at this time. The operating partnership believes it now
has sufficient field compression and permits for vacuum operation for the
foreseeable future. These capital and operating costs are reflected
in the Net Profits Interests payments we receive from the operating
partnership.
In 1998,
Oklahoma regulations removed production quantity restrictions in the
Guymon-Hugoton field and did not address efforts by third parties to persuade
Oklahoma to permit infill drilling in the Guymon-Hugoton field. Infill drilling
could require considerable capital expenditures. The outcome and the cost of
such activities are unpredictable and could influence the amount we receive from
the Net Profits Interests.
Liquidity
and Working Capital
Cash and
cash equivalents totaled $23,175,000 at June 30, 2008 and $15,001,000 at
December 31, 2007.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We
utilize the full cost method of accounting for costs related to our oil and
natural gas properties. Under this method, all such costs are capitalized and
amortized on an aggregate basis over the estimated lives of the properties using
the units-of-production method. These capitalized costs are subject to a ceiling
test, however, which limits such pooled costs to the aggregate of the present
value of future net revenues attributable to proved oil and natural gas reserves
discounted at 10% plus the lower of cost or market value of unproved properties.
Oil and natural gas properties are evaluated using the full cost ceiling test at
the end of each quarter and when events indicate possible
impairment.
The
discounted present value of our proved oil and natural gas reserves is a major
component of the ceiling calculation and requires many subjective judgments.
Estimates of reserves are forecasts based on engineering and geological
analyses. Different reserve engineers may reach different conclusions as to
estimated quantities of natural gas reserves based on the same information. Our
reserve estimates are prepared by independent consultants. The passage of time
provides more qualitative information regarding reserve estimates, and revisions
are made to prior estimates based on updated information. However, there can be
no assurance that significant revisions will not be necessary in the future.
Significant downward revisions could result in an impairment representing a
non-cash charge to earnings. In addition to the impact on calculation of the
ceiling test, estimates of proved reserves are also a major component of the
calculation of depletion.
While the
quantities of proved reserves require substantial judgment, the associated
prices of oil and natural gas reserves that are included in the discounted
present value of our reserves are objectively determined. The ceiling test
calculation requires use of prices and costs in effect as of the last day of the
accounting period, which are generally held constant for the life of the
properties. As a result, the present value is not necessarily an indication of
the fair value of the reserves. Oil and natural gas prices have historically
been volatile and the prevailing prices at any given time may not reflect our
Partnership’s or the industry’s forecast of future prices.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. For example, estimates of uncollected revenues and
unpaid expenses from royalties and net profits interests in properties operated
by non-affiliated entities are particularly subjective due to our inability to
gain accurate and timely information. Therefore, actual results could differ
from those estimates.
The
following information provides quantitative and qualitative information about
our potential exposures to market risk. The term “market risk” refers to the
risk of loss arising from adverse changes in oil and natural gas prices,
interest rates and currency exchange rates. The disclosures are not meant to be
precise indicators of expected future losses but, rather, indicators of possible
losses.
13
Market
Risk Related to Oil and Natural Gas Prices
Essentially
all of our assets and sources of income are from Royalty Properties and the Net
Profits Interests, which generally entitle us to receive a share of the proceeds
based on oil and natural gas production from those properties. Consequently, we
are subject to market risk from fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices.
Pricing for oil and natural gas production has been volatile and unpredictable
for several years. We do not anticipate entering into financial hedging
activities intended to reduce our exposure to oil and natural gas price
fluctuations.
Absence
of Interest Rate and Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We do not
anticipate having a credit facility or incurring any debt, other than trade
debt. Therefore, we do not expect interest rate risk to be material to us. We do
not anticipate engaging in transactions in foreign currencies that could expose
us to foreign currency related market risk.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the
end of the period covered by this report, our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation, they have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures effectively ensure that
the information required to be disclosed in the reports we file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Changes
in Internal Controls
There
were no changes in our internal controls (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures.
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
|||
See
Note 2 – Contingencies in Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
|||
RISK
FACTORS
|
|||
None.
|
|||
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
|||
None.
|
|||
DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
|||
None.
|
|||
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
|||
(a) We
held our Annual Unitholders meeting on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 in Dallas,
Texas.
|
|||
(b) Proxies
were solicited by the Board of Managers pursuant to Regulation 14A under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. There were no solicitations in
opposition to the nominees listed in the proxy statement and all of such
nominees were duly elected.
(c) The
only matter voted on at the meeting was the election of the three nominees
to the Board of Managers. Out of the 28,240,431 units issued and
outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting, 24,985,145 units were
present in person or by proxy. The results were as
follows:
|
Nominee
|
Votes
for Election
|
Votes
Withheld
from
Election
|
Broker
Non-Votes
|
|||
Buford
P. Berry
|
24,741,013
|
244,132
|
3,255,286
|
|||
C.W.
“Bill” Russell
|
24,819,105
|
166,040
|
3,255,286
|
|||
Ronald
P. Trout
|
24,825,281
|
159,864
|
3,255,286
|
ITEM
5.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
None.
|
||
ITEM
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
|
See
the attached Index to Exhibits.
|
14
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
DORCHESTER
MINERALS, L.P.
|
|||
By:
|
Dorchester
Minerals Management LP
|
||
its
General Partner
|
|||
By:
|
Dorchester
Minerals Management GP LLC
|
||
its
General Partner
|
By:
|
/s/
William Casey McManemin
|
||
William
Casey McManemin
|
|||
Date:
August 7, 2008
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||
By:
|
/s/
H.C. Allen, Jr.
|
||
H.C.
Allen, Jr.
|
|||
Date:
August 7, 2008
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
||
15
Number
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate
of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals, L.P. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Dorchester Minerals’ Registration Statement on
Form S-4, Registration Number 333-88282)
|
3.2
|
|
Amended
and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals, L.P.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report
on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31,
2002)
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate
of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Management LP (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Dorchester Minerals’ Registration Statement
on Form S-4, Registration Number 333-88282)
|
3.4
|
|
Amended
and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals
Management LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Dorchester
Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002)
|
3.5
|
|
Certificate
of Formation of Dorchester Minerals Management GP LLC (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.7 to Dorchester Minerals’ Registration Statement on
Form S-4, Registration Number 333-88282)
|
3.6
|
|
Amended
and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Dorchester Minerals
Management GP LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Dorchester
Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002)
|
3.7
|
|
Certificate
of Formation of Dorchester Minerals Operating GP LLC (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.10 to Dorchester Minerals’ Registration Statement
on Form S-4, Registration Number 333-88282)
|
3.8
|
|
Limited
Liability Company Agreement of Dorchester Minerals Operating GP LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.11 to Dorchester Minerals’
Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration Number
333-88282)
|
3.9
|
|
Certificate
of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Operating LP (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.12 to Dorchester Minerals’ Registration
Statement on Form S-4, Registration Number 333-88282)
|
3.10
|
|
Amended
and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals
Operating LP. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to Dorchester
Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002)
|
3.11
|
|
Certificate
of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Oklahoma LP (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.11 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002)
|
3.12
|
|
Agreement
of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Oklahoma LP (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.12 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002)
|
3.13
|
|
Certificate
of Incorporation of Dorchester Minerals Oklahoma GP, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.13 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002)
|
3.14
|
|
Bylaws
of Dorchester Minerals Oklahoma GP, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.14 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002)
|
3.15
|
Certificate
of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Acquisition LP (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.15 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004)
|
|
3.16
|
Agreement
of Limited Partnership of Dorchester Minerals Acquisition LP (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.16 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
|
|
3.17
|
Certificate
of Incorporation of Dorchester Minerals Acquisition GP, Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.17 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
|
|
3.18
|
Bylaws
of Dorchester Minerals Acquisition GP, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.18 to Dorchester Minerals’ Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004)
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350 (contained within Exhibit 32.1
hereto)
|
16