DYNEX CAPITAL INC - Quarter Report: 2005 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
or
Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934
For
the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission
File Number: 1-9819
|
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia
|
52-1549373
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(IRS
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
4551
Cox Road, Suite 300, Glen Allen, Virginia
|
23060-6740
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(804)
217-5800
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
þ
Yes o
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined
in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o
Yes þ
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o
Yes þ
No
On
October 31, 2005, the registrant had 12,163,391 shares of common stock
outstanding with a par value of $.01 per share, which
is the registrant’s only class of common stock.
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
FORM
10-Q
INDEX
Page
|
|||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
1
|
||
1
|
|||
2
|
|||
3
|
|||
4
|
|||
Item
2.
|
10
|
||
Item
3.
|
25
|
||
Item
4.
|
26
|
||
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
28
|
||
Item
2.
|
29
|
||
Item
3.
|
29
|
||
Item
4.
|
29
|
||
Item
5.
|
29
|
||
Item
6.
|
29
|
||
30
|
i
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
BALANCE
SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(amounts
in thousands except share data)
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
19,214
|
$
|
52,522
|
|||
Other
assets
|
4,807
|
4,964
|
|||||
24,021
|
57,486
|
||||||
Investments:
|
|||||||
Securitized
finance receivables:
|
|||||||
Loans,
net
|
759,386
|
1,036,123
|
|||||
Debt
securities
|
2,194
|
206,434
|
|||||
761,580
|
1,242,557
|
||||||
Securities
|
78,890
|
87,706
|
|||||
Other
investments
|
4,493
|
7,596
|
|||||
Other
loans
|
3,341
|
5,589
|
|||||
848,304
|
1,343,448
|
||||||
$
|
872,325
|
$
|
1,400,934
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
LIABILITIES
|
|||||||
Securitization
financing:
|
|||||||
Non-recourse
bonds
|
$
|
537,385
|
$
|
1,177,280
|
|||
Repurchase
agreements
|
149,823
|
-
|
|||||
687,208
|
1,177,280
|
||||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
27,830
|
70,468
|
|||||
715,038
|
1,247,748
|
||||||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
7,753
|
4,420
|
|||||
722,791
|
1,252,168
|
||||||
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 10)
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|||||||
9.75%
Cumulative Convertible Series D Preferred stock, par value $.01
per share,
50,000,000 shares authorized, 5,628,737 shares issued and outstanding
($57,624 and $58,040 aggregate liquidation preference,
respectively)
|
55,666
|
55,666
|
|||||
Common
stock, par value $.01 per share, 100,000,000 shares
authorized,
12,163,391
and 12,162,391 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
122
|
122
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
366,903
|
366,896
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income
|
(42
|
)
|
3,817
|
||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(273,115
|
)
|
(277,735
|
)
|
|||
149,534
|
148,766
|
||||||
$
|
872,325
|
$
|
1,400,934
|
See
notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
1
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
OF
OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(amounts
in thousands except share and per share data)
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||||
Interest
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Securitized
finance receivables
|
$
|
14,470
|
$
|
29,260
|
$
|
53,394
|
$
|
94,615
|
|||||
Securities
|
974
|
509
|
3,038
|
1,623
|
|||||||||
Other
loans
|
149
|
181
|
616
|
514
|
|||||||||
Other
investments
|
124
|
76
|
1,255
|
122
|
|||||||||
15,717
|
30,026
|
58,303
|
96,874
|
||||||||||
Interest
and related expense:
|
|||||||||||||
Securitization
financing
|
12,716
|
23,485
|
47,226
|
77,912
|
|||||||||
Repurchase
agreements and senior notes
|
365
|
97
|
1,256
|
422
|
|||||||||
Other
|
22
|
50
|
18
|
192
|
|||||||||
13,103
|
23,632
|
48,500
|
78,526
|
||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
2,614
|
6,394
|
9,803
|
18,348
|
|||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
(1,622
|
)
|
(1,291
|
)
|
(4,547
|
)
|
(17,438
|
)
|
|||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
992
|
5,103
|
5,256
|
910
|
|||||||||
Impairment
charges
|
(207
|
)
|
(162
|
)
|
(2,259
|
)
|
(9,569
|
)
|
|||||
(Loss)
gain on sale of investments, net
|
(48
|
)
|
(3,147
|
)
|
9,802
|
(3,143
|
)
|
||||||
Other
(expense) income
|
(1,026
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
331
|
(264
|
)
|
||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(1,610
|
)
|
(1,847
|
)
|
(4,500
|
)
|
(6,330
|
)
|
|||||
Net
(loss) income
|
(1,899
|
)
|
(56
|
)
|
8,630
|
(18,396
|
)
|
||||||
Preferred
stock charge
|
(1,336
|
)
|
(1,381
|
)
|
(4,010
|
)
|
(527
|
)
|
|||||
Net
(loss) income to common shareholders
|
$
|
(3,235
|
)
|
$
|
(1,437
|
)
|
$
|
4,620
|
$
|
(18,923
|
)
|
||
Change
in net unrealized gain/(loss) on:
|
|||||||||||||
Investments
classified as available-for-sale
|
(116
|
)
|
211
|
(4,464
|
)
|
3,526
|
|||||||
Hedge
instruments
|
21
|
349
|
605
|
2,354
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive
(loss) income
|
$
|
(1,994
|
)
|
$
|
504
|
$
|
4,771
|
$
|
(12,516
|
)
|
|||
Net
(loss) income per common share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
$
|
0.38
|
$
|
(1.70
|
)
|
||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
12,163,391
|
12,162,391
|
12,162,951
|
11,144,102
|
See
notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
OF
CASH
FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(amounts
in thousands)
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||
September
30,
|
|||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
Operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
8,630
|
$
|
(18,396
|
)
|
||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
4,547
|
17,438
|
|||||
Impairment
charges
|
2,259
|
9,569
|
|||||
(Gain)
loss on sale of investments
|
(9,802
|
)
|
3,143
|
||||
Amortization
and depreciation
|
1,425
|
3,548
|
|||||
Net
change in other assets, accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
164
|
1,048
|
|||||
Net
cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities
|
7,223
|
16,350
|
|||||
Investing
activities:
|
|||||||
Principal
payments received on securitized finance receivables
|
106,593
|
223,255
|
|||||
Payments
received on other investments, securities and other loans
|
51,767
|
18,539
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sales of securities and other investments
|
20,297
|
23,065
|
|||||
Purchase
of, or advances on, investments
|
(45,572
|
)
|
(11,087
|
)
|
|||
Other
|
171
|
45
|
|||||
Net
cash and cash equivalents provided by investing activities
|
133,256
|
253,817
|
|||||
Financing
activities:
|
|||||||
Principal
payments on non-recourse securitization financing
|
(81,309
|
)
|
(224,076
|
)
|
|||
Net
borrowings under securitization financing repurchase agreement
|
149,823
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sale of redemption rights
|
-
|
7,377
|
|||||
Redemption
of securitization financing bonds
|
(195,653
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
repayments on repurchase agreement borrowings
|
(42,638
|
)
|
(8,502
|
)
|
|||
Repayment
of senior notes
|
-
|
(10,050
|
)
|
||||
Retirement
of preferred stock
|
-
|
(647
|
)
|
||||
Dividends
paid
|
(4,010
|
)
|
(1,263
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash and cash equivalents used for financing activities
|
(173,787
|
)
|
(237,161
|
)
|
|||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(33,308
|
)
|
33,006
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
52,522
|
7,386
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
19,214
|
$
|
40,392
|
|||
Supplement
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$
|
48,189
|
$
|
80,880
|
See
notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
September
30, 2005
(amounts
in thousands except share and per share data)
NOTE
1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in
accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the
information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in
the United States of America, hereinafter referred to as “generally accepted
accounting principles,” for complete financial statements. The condensed
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dynex Capital,
Inc.
and its qualified real estate investment trust (“REIT”) subsidiaries and taxable
REIT subsidiary (collectively, “Dynex” or the “Company”). All inter-company
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
Company consolidates entities in which it owns more than 50% of the voting
equity and control does not rest with others. The Company follows the equity
method of accounting for investments with greater than 20% and less than
a 50%
interest in partnerships and corporate joint ventures or when it is able
to
influence the financial and operating policies of the investee but owns less
than 20% of the voting equity. For all other investments, the cost method
is
applied.
The
Company has elected to follow the intrinsic value method in accounting for
its
stock based compensation issued to employees and non-employee directors.
Accordingly, the Company did not recognize compensation expense upon the
issuance of its stock appreciation rights and stock options.
The
Company believes it has complied with the requirements for qualification
as a
REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). To the
extent the Company qualifies as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, it
generally will not be subject to federal income tax on the amount of its
income
or gain that is distributed as dividends to shareholders.
In
the
opinion of management, all significant adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed
consolidated financial statements have been included. The financial statements
presented are unaudited. Operating results for the three and nine months
ended
September 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2005. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted.
The unaudited financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “2004 Form 10-K”),
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The
preparation of financial statements, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles, requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual
results could differ from those estimates. The primary estimates inherent
in the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are discussed below
and
in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 2004 Form
10-K.
The
Company uses estimates in establishing fair value for its financial instruments.
Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried in the accompanying
financial statements at estimated fair value. Securities are both fixed-rate
and
adjustable-rate. Estimates of fair value for securities are based on market
prices provided by certain dealers, when available. Estimates of fair value
for
certain other securities are determined by calculating the present value
of the
projected cash flows of the instruments using market-based assumptions such
as
estimated future interest rates and estimated market spreads to applicable
indices for comparable securities, and using collateral based assumptions
such
as prepayment rates and credit loss assumptions based on the most recent
performance and anticipated performance of the underlying
collateral.
4
The
Company also has credit risk on loans in its portfolio as discussed in Note
4.
An allowance for loan losses has been established for currently existing
estimated losses in the loan portfolio, which are deemed to be probable as
to
their occurrence. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated and adjusted
periodically by management based on the actual and estimated timing and amount
of credit losses. Provisions made to increase the allowance for loan losses
are
presented as provision for loan losses in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of operations. The Company’s actual credit losses may
differ from those estimates used to establish the allowance.
Certain
amounts for 2004 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted
in 2005.
NOTE
2 - NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Net
(loss) income per common share is presented on both a basic and diluted per
common share basis. Diluted net (loss) income per common share assumes the
conversion of the convertible preferred stock into common stock, using the
if-converted method, and stock appreciation rights and options to the extent
that they are outstanding, using the treasury stock method, but only if these
items are dilutive. Each share of Series D preferred stock is convertible
into
one share of common stock. The following table reconciles the numerator and
denominator for both basic and diluted net (loss) income per common share
for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Income
|
Weighted-
Average
Number
Of
Shares
|
Loss
|
Weighted-
Average
Number
Of
Shares
|
Income
|
Weighted-
Average
Number
Of
Shares
|
Loss
|
Weighted-
Average
Number
Of
Shares
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(1,899
|
)
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
$
|
8,630
|
$
|
(18,396
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock charge
|
(1,336
|
)
|
(1,381
|
)
|
(4,010
|
)
|
(527
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income to common shareholders
|
$
|
(3,235
|
)
|
12,163,391
|
$
|
(1,437
|
)
|
12,162,391
|
$
|
4,620
|
12,162,951
|
$
|
(18,923
|
)
|
11,144,102
|
||||||||||
Net
(loss) income per share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
& diluted
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
$
|
0.38
|
$
|
(1.70
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Reconciliation
of shares not included in calculation of earnings
per share due to anti-dilutive effect
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series
A preferred stock
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
126,101
|
||||||||||||
Series
B preferred stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(537
|
)
|
175,815
|
||||||||||||||||
Series
C preferred stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(666
|
)
|
174,973
|
||||||||||||||||
Series
D preferred stock
|
(1,336
|
)
|
5,628,737
|
(1,381
|
)
|
5,628,737
|
(4,010
|
)
|
5,628,737
|
(2,644
|
)
|
2,773,283
|
|||||||||||||
Expense
and incremental shares of stock appreciation rights
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
86
|
-
|
21,045
|
|||||||||||||||||
$
|
(1,336
|
)
|
5,628,737
|
$
|
(1,381
|
)
|
5,628,737
|
$
|
(4,010
|
)
|
5,628,823
|
$
|
(4,184
|
)
|
3,271,217
|
NOTE
3 - SECURITIZED FINANCE RECEIVABLES
The
following table summarizes the types of securitized finance receivables at
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004:
September
30,
2005
|
December
31,
2004
|
||||||
Loans,
at amortized cost
|
$
|
777,187
|
$
|
1,064,137
|
|||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(17,801
|
)
|
(28,014
|
)
|
|||
Loans,
net
|
759,386
|
1,036,123
|
|||||
Debt
securities
|
2,194
|
206,434
|
|||||
|
$
|
761,580
|
$
|
1,242,557
|
5
The
following table summarizes the amortized cost basis, gross unrealized gains
and
losses and estimated fair value of debt securities pledged as securitized
finance receivables at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004:
September
30,
2005
|
December
31, 2004
|
||||||
Debt
securities, at amortized cost
|
$
|
2,143
|
$
|
205,370
|
|||
Gross
unrealized gains
|
51
|
1,064
|
|||||
$
|
2,194
|
$
|
206,434
|
The
components of securitized finance receivables at September 30, 2005 and December
31, 2004 are as follows:
September
30, 2005
|
December
31, 2004
|
||||||||||||||||||
Loans,
net
|
Debt
Securities
|
Total
|
Loans,
net
|
Debt
Securities
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
Collateral:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$
|
588,944
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
588,944
|
$
|
640,090
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
640,090
|
|||||||
Manufactured
housing
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
198,246
|
149,420
|
347,666
|
|||||||||||||
Single-family
|
177,754
|
2,092
|
179,846
|
225,055
|
52,753
|
277,808
|
|||||||||||||
766,698
|
2,092
|
768,790
|
1,063,391
|
202,173
|
1,265,564
|
||||||||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(17,801
|
)
|
-
|
(17,801
|
)
|
(28,014
|
)
|
-
|
(28,014
|
)
|
|||||||||
Funds
held by trustees
|
6,973
|
26
|
6,999
|
130
|
43
|
173
|
|||||||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
5,309
|
17
|
5,326
|
6,548
|
202
|
6,750
|
|||||||||||||
Unamortized
discounts and premiums, net
|
(1,793
|
)
|
8
|
(1,785
|
)
|
(5,932
|
)
|
2,952
|
(2,980
|
)
|
|||||||||
Unrealized
gain, net
|
-
|
51
|
51
|
-
|
1,064
|
1,064
|
|||||||||||||
$
|
759,386
|
$
|
2,194
|
$
|
761,580
|
$
|
1,036,123
|
$
|
206,434
|
$
|
1,242,557
|
The
commercial and manufactured housing collateral is encumbered by non-recourse
securitized financing.
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Company redeemed, at par, $195,653 of
non-recourse securitization financing bonds collateralized by the single-family
loans pursuant to its redemption rights within the respective indenture.
The
redemption was partially financed with $170,655 of repurchase agreements,
of
which $149,823 remained outstanding at September 30, 2005. The redeemed bonds,
which collateralize the related repurchase agreement financing, have been
removed from the Company’s financial statements. This repurchase agreement has
been presented as securitization financing in the financial statements. The
redeemed non-recourse securitization financing bonds have not been retired
by
the Company, because of its plans to reissue the bonds.
During
the second quarter, the Company sold its interests in approximately $367,154
in
securitization finance receivables and the associated securitization trust,
resulting in derecognition of these receivables and the extinguishment of
$363,871 in related securitization financing bonds. The Company received
proceeds of $8,000 for the sale of these interests, recorded mortgage servicing
assets of $3,176 for the retained servicing on the loans, and recognized
a gain
of $8,228. As part of this transaction, the Company also sold one of its
subsidiaries on which it recorded a gain of $1,000, which was recorded in
other
income.
6
NOTE
4 - ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The
Company reserves for currently existing estimated credit losses on loans
in its
investment portfolio. The following tables summarize the aggregate activity
for
the allowance for loan losses for the three-month and nine-month periods
ended
September 30, 2005
and
2004, respectively:
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$
|
16,536
|
$
|
49,468
|
$
|
28,014
|
$
|
43,364
|
|||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,622
|
1,291
|
4,547
|
17,438
|
|||||||||
Charge-offs
|
(357
|
)
|
(4,626
|
)
|
(3,450
|
)
|
(14,669
|
)
|
|||||
Portfolio
sold
|
-
|
-
|
(11,310
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
$
|
17,801
|
$
|
46,133
|
$
|
17,801
|
$
|
46,133
|
The
portfolio sold of $11,310 represents the amount of allowance that was removed
from the balance sheet in connection with the derecognition of the related
securitized finance receivables during the second quarter of 2005 described
above in Note 3.
The
Company identified $48,196 and $72,431 of impaired commercial mortgage loans
at
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The decline is primarily
due to the repayment of approximately $10,655 of loans, which were identified
as
impaired at December 31, 2004, during 2005 as well as improvement in the
performance of the underlying real estate collateral value of several previously
impaired loans. At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company
had
approximately $39,978, which excludes a delinquent loan that paid in full
subsequent to September 30, 2005, and $50,941 respectively, in sixty-plus
day
delinquent commercial mortgage loans outstanding.
NOTE
5 - OTHER INVESTMENTS
The
following table summarizes the Company’s other investments at September 30, 2005
and December 31, 2004:
September
30,
2005
|
December
31,
2004
|
||||||
Delinquent
property tax receivables and security
|
$
|
3,640
|
$
|
6,000
|
|||
Real
estate owned
|
853
|
1,596
|
|||||
$
|
4,493
|
$
|
7,596
|
The
balance of the delinquent property tax security includes an unrealized gain
of
$53 and none as of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
At
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company had real estate owned
with
a current carrying value of $853 and $1,596, respectively, resulting from
foreclosures on the properties collateralizing the delinquent property tax
receivables and securities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2005
and
2004, the Company collected an aggregate of $2,279 and $6,170, respectively,
on
delinquent property tax receivables and securities, including net sales proceeds
from related real estate owned.
7
NOTE
6 - SECURITIES
The
following table summarizes the Company’s securities and their effective interest
rate at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004:
September
30, 2005
|
December
31, 2004
|
||||||||||||
Fair
Value
|
Effective
Interest Rate
|
Fair
Value
|
Effective
Interest Rate
|
||||||||||
Securities,
available-for-sale:
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed-rate mortgage securities
|
$
|
32,500
|
5.21
|
%
|
$
|
79,462
|
4.54
|
%
|
|||||
Mortgage-related securities
|
19
|
0.33
|
%
|
28
|
0.33
|
%
|
|||||||
U.S. Treasury bills and commercial paper
|
44,716
|
3.14
|
%
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||
Equity securities
|
1,797
|
7,438
|
|||||||||||
79,032
|
86,928
|
||||||||||||
Gross
unrealized gains
|
172
|
852
|
|||||||||||
Gross
unrealized losses
|
(314
|
)
|
(74
|
)
|
|||||||||
$
|
78,890
|
$
|
87,706
|
NOTE
7 -DEBT
The
Company entered into a securitization financing repurchase agreement, which
is
recourse to the Company, to partially finance the redemption of certain
non-recourse securitization financing bonds as described in Note 3. The
securitization financing repurchase agreement of $149,823 is collateralized
by
$169,897 of the related redeemed bonds, which were eliminated in the
consolidated financial statements.
The
Company utilizes other recourse repurchase agreements to finance certain
of its
investments. The Company had $27,830 and $70,468 of repurchase agreements
outstanding at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The
repurchase agreements were collateralized by securities with a fair value
of
$30,761 and $78,491 at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
respectively.
NOTE
8 - PREFERRED STOCK
At
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the total liquidation preference
on
the Preferred Stock was $57,624 and $58,040, respectively. There were $1,336
and
$1,337 ($0.2375 per share) of dividends accrued and payable on the Series
D
Preferred Stock at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 ,
respectively.
NOTE
9 - DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
At
September 30, 2005, the Company had no outstanding derivative financial
instruments. The derivative financial instruments outstanding at December
31,
2004 matured during the second quarter of 2005. During the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2005, the Company recognized $605 of other comprehensive
loss outstanding at December 31, 2004 on these contracts. At September 30,
2005,
there was $4 of accumulated other comprehensive income remaining related
to
previous fair value adjustments.
NOTE
10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As
discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries are defendants
in
litigation. The following discussion is the current status of the
litigation.
GLS
Capital, Inc. (“GLS”), a subsidiary of the Company, and the County of Allegheny,
Pennsylvania (“Allegheny County”), are defendants in a lawsuit in the Court of
Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (the “Court”). Plaintiffs
allege that GLS illegally charged the taxpayers of Allegheny County certain
attorney fees, costs and expenses, and interest in the collection of delinquent
property tax receivables owned by GLS. Plaintiffs are seeking class action
status. During the third quarter 2005, the Court held hearings in this
matter, and has not yet ruled on whether it will grant class action status
in
the
8
litigation.
Plaintiffs have not enumerated its damages in this matter. We believe that
the ultimate outcome of this litigation will not have a material impact on
our
financial condition, but may have a material impact on reported results for
the
particular period presented.
The
Company and Dynex Commercial, Inc. (“DCI”), formerly an affiliate of the Company
and now known as DCI Commercial, Inc., are appellees (or “respondents”) in the
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Judicial District of Texas at Dallas, related
to
the matter of Basic Capital Management et al (collectively, “BCM” or “the
Plaintiffs”) versus Dynex Commercial, Inc. et al. During the third quarter
2005, Plaintiffs, the Company, and DCI filed various briefs in the matter
in
accordance with the Court of Appeals schedule, in anticipation of a hearing
on
the appeal sometime in 2006. Plaintiff’s appeal seeks to overturn a
judgment in favor of the Company and DCI which denied recovery to Plaintiffs,
and to have a judgment entered in favor of Plaintiffs based on a jury award
for
damages against the Company of $253, and against DCI for $2,200 or $25,600,
all
of which was set aside by the trial court. In the alternative, Plaintiffs
are seeking a new trial.
On
February 11, 2005, a putative class action complaint alleging violations
of the
federal securities laws and various state common law claims was filed against
the Company, our subsidiary MERIT Securities Corporation, Stephen J. Benedetti,
the Company's Executive Vice President, and Thomas H. Potts, the Company's
former President and a former Director, in United States District Court for
the
Southern District of New York (“District Court”) by the Teamsters Local 445
Freight Division Pension Fund ("Teamsters"). The lawsuit purported to be a
class action on behalf of purchasers of MERIT Series 13 securitization financing
bonds, which are collateralized by manufactured housing loans. On May 31,
2005, the Teamsters filed an amended class action complaint. The amended
complaint dropped all state common law claims but added federal securities
claims related to the MERIT Series 12 securitization financing bonds. The
Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on July 15, 2005
to
which Teamsters filed a response with the District Court on August 15,
2005. The Company has evaluated the allegations and believes them to be
without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against them.
Although
no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of the above
litigation, the Company believes the resolution of these lawsuits will not
have
a material effect on our consolidated balance sheet but could materially
affect
our consolidated results of operations in a given year.
NOTE
11 - STOCK
BASED COMPENSATION
On
January 2, 2005, the Company granted 126,297 stock appreciation rights (SAR)
to
certain of its employees and officers under the Dynex Capital, Inc. 2004
Stock
Incentive Plan. The SARs vest over the next four years in equal annual
installments, expire on December 31, 2011 and have an exercise price of $7.81
per share, which was the market price of the stock on the grant
date.
On
June
17, 2005, the Company granted options to acquire an aggregate of 40,000 shares
of common stock to the members of its Board of Directors under the Dynex
Capital, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. The options have an exercise price
of
$8.46 per share, which represents 110% of the closing stock price on the
grant
date, expire on June 17, 2010 and were fully vested when granted.
9
The
following table presents the effect on net income and earnings per share
if the
Company had applied the fair value method to the SARs and options granted
to
employees and Directors using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model.
Three
Months Ended
September
30, 2005
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30, 2005
|
||||||
Net
(loss) income to common shareholders
|
$
|
(3,235
|
)
|
$
|
4,620
|
||
Fair
value method stock based compensation expense
|
2
|
(98
|
)
|
||||
Pro
forma net income to common shareholders
|
$
|
(3,233
|
)
|
$
|
4,522
|
||
Net
(loss) income per common share:
|
|||||||
Basic
- as reported
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
$
|
0.38
|
||
Basic
- pro forma
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
$
|
0.37
|
NOTE
12 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No.
123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (FAS 123R). This statement supersedes
APB Opinion No. 25 and its related implementation guidance. The statement
establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity
exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services. This statement focuses
primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee
services in share-based payment transactions. The most significant change
resulting from this statement is the requirement for public companies to
expense
employee share-based payments under fair value as originally introduced in
SFAS
No. 123. This statement is effective for public companies as of the beginning
of
the first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005, or December
15, 2005 for small business issuers. The Company will adopt this statement
effective January 1, 2006. The Company presented the amount that would have
been
recorded in general and administrative expense for the quarter and nine month
period ended September 30, 2005 if the Company had adopted the provisions
of FAS
123R in Note 11 above.
In
June
2004, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force Abstract 03-1, "The Meaning
of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments"
("EITF 03-1"). EITF 03-1 provides authoritative guidance regarding determining
when an investment is considered impaired and the impairment is
other-than-temporary. EITF 03-1 requires that the Company evaluate whether
an
impairment is other-than-temporary, and, if the impairment is
other-than-temporary, recognize an impairment loss equal to the excess of
the
amortized cost over the estimated fair value of the investment. In September
2004 the FASB delayed the effective date of paragraphs 10-20 of this issue.
These paragraphs give guidance on how to evaluate and recognize an impairment
loss that is other-than-temporary. The delay does not suspend the requirement
to
recognize other than temporary impairments as required by existing authoritative
literature. On July 5, 2005, the FASB decided not to provide additional guidance
on the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and stated that the proposed
FASB Staff Position ("FSP") EITF Issue No. 03-1-a, "Implementation Guidance
for
the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No. 03-1," will be issued as
final. The final FSP will supersede EITF 03-1. The Company does not expect
the
adoption of the FSP, as contained in its current draft form, to have a material
effect on our consolidated financial condition, consolidated results of
operations, or liquidity.
The
following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results
of
operations of the Company as of and for the three-month and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2005 should be read in conjunction with the Company's
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
report.
The
Company is a financial services company, which invests in loans and securities
principally consisting of, or secured by, single family mortgage loans and
commercial mortgage loans. The loans and securities in which the Company
invests
have generally been pooled and pledged to a securitization trust (i.e.
securitized) as collateral for non-recourse bonds (“non-
10
recourse
securitization financing”), which provides long-term financing for such loans
while limiting credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. The Company earns
the
net interest spread between the interest income on the loans and securities
in
its investment portfolio and the interest and other expenses associated with
the
non-recourse securitization financing. The Company also collects payments
from
property owners on its investment in delinquent property tax receivables.
In
recent
years, the Company elected to sell certain non-core assets, improving its
financial flexibility by converting investments into cash, and, in 2004,
the
Company completed a restructuring of its equity capital while simultaneously
eliminating $18.5 million in preferred dividends in arrears. The Company’s
investment portfolio assets have declined approximately $495 million during
2005
to $848 million at September 30, 2005. During that time, the Company improved
its liquidity, as cash and cash equivalents and short-term securities, which
the
Company considers its reinvestable capital, increased $11.4 million to $63.9
million at September 30, 2005. The Company has also recorded cumulative gains
of
$9.8 million from the sale of these assets during 2005.
The
Company continues to focus its efforts in the near-term on managing its current
investment portfolio to maximize cash flow, while evaluating longer-term
opportunities for redeployment of its capital. Given the low interest rate
environment and the flat yield curve, however, and the challenging reinvestment
environment in traditional mortgage REIT opportunities, the Company is
considering investments in assets that are outside those of a traditional
mortgage REIT, and at some point may forego its REIT status. The Company
has an
estimated $150 million in net operating loss carryforwards which can be used
to
offset future taxable income through approximately 2019.
The
Company announced on November 16, 2005 that it will be redeeming 25% of its
Series D Preferred Stock in the first quarter of 2006. This redemption will
reduce the Series D Preferred Stock outstanding by approximately $14 million,
saving the Company an approximate $1.3 million in dividends annually. The
Board
of Directors of the Company also approved the repurchase of up to one million
shares of common stock of the Company upon the completion of the redemption
of
the Series D Preferred Stock. The repurchase of any shares of common stock
may
occur if alternative uses of the capital are not available and if accretive
to
book value per common share.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of
operations are based in large part upon its condensed consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of the
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported period.
Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Critical
accounting policies are defined as those that reflect significant judgments
or
uncertainties, and which may result in materially different results under
different assumptions and conditions, or the application of which may have
a
material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The following are the
Company’s critical accounting policies.
Consolidation
of Subsidiaries.
The
consolidated financial statements represent the Company’s accounts after the
elimination of inter-company transactions. The Company consolidates entities
in
which it owns more than 50% of the voting equity and control of the entity
does
not rest with others. The Company follows the equity method of accounting
for
investments with greater than 20% and less than a 50% interest in partnerships
and corporate joint ventures or when it is able to influence the financial
and
operating policies of the investee but owns less than 20% of the voting equity.
For all other investments, the cost method is applied.
Impairments.
The
Company evaluates all securities in its investment portfolio for
other-than-temporary impairments. A security is generally defined to be
other-than-temporarily impaired if, for a maximum period of three consecutive
quarters, the carrying value of such security exceeds its estimated fair
value
and the Company estimates, based on projected future cash flows or other
fair
value determinants, that the fair value will remain below the carrying value
for
the foreseeable future. If an other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to
exist, the Company records an impairment charge to adjust the carrying value
of
the security down to its estimated fair value. In certain instances, as a
result
of the other-than-temporary impairment analysis, the recognition or accrual
of
interest will be discontinued and the security will be placed on non-accrual
status.
11
Allowance
for Loan Losses.
The
Company has credit risk on loans pledged in securitization financing
transactions and classified as securitized finance receivables in its investment
portfolio. An allowance for loan losses has been estimated and established
for
currently existing probable losses on those assets. Factors considered in
establishing an allowance include current loan delinquencies, historical
cure
rates of delinquent loans, and historical and anticipated loss severity of
the
loans as they are liquidated. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated
and
adjusted periodically by management based on the actual and estimated timing
and
amount of probable credit losses, using the above factors, as well as industry
loss experience. Where loans are considered homogeneous, the allowance for
loan
losses is established and evaluated on a pool basis. Otherwise, the allowance
for loan losses is established and evaluated on a loan-specific basis.
Provisions made to increase the allowance are a current period expense to
operations.
Generally,
single-family loans are considered impaired when they are sixty-days past
due.
Commercial mortgage loans are evaluated on an individual basis for impairment.
Generally, a commercial loan with a debt service coverage ratio of less than
one
is considered impaired. However, based on information specific to a commercial
loan, commercial loans with a debt service coverage ratio less than one may
not
be considered impaired; conversely, commercial loans with a debt service
coverage ratio greater than one may be considered impaired. This information
may
include whether the loan is delinquent, the current and expected performance
of
the underlying collateral, and information and analyses provided by the loan
servicer. Certain of the commercial mortgage loans are covered by loan
guarantees that limit the Company’s exposure on these loans. The level of
allowance for loan losses required for these loans is reduced by the amount
of
applicable loan guarantees. The Company’s actual credit losses may differ from
the estimates used to establish the allowance.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
The
following table presents information on the Company’s financial condition and is
followed by a discussion of those items.
(amounts
in thousands except per share data)
|
September
30, 2005
|
December
31, 2004
|
|||||
Investments:
|
|||||||
Securitized
finance receivables:
|
|||||||
Loans,
net
|
$
|
759,386
|
$
|
1,036,123
|
|||
Debt
securities
|
2,194
|
206,434
|
|||||
Securities
|
78,890
|
87,706
|
|||||
Other
investments
|
4,493
|
7,596
|
|||||
Other
loans
|
3,341
|
5,589
|
|||||
Securitization
financing:
|
|||||||
Non-recourse
bonds
|
537,385
|
1,177,280
|
|||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
149,823
|
-
|
|||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
27,830
|
70,468
|
|||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
149,534
|
148,766
|
|||||
Book
value per common share
|
7.67
|
7.60
|
Securitized
finance receivables.
Loans,
net decreased to $759.4 million at September 30, 2005 compared to $1,036.1
million at December 31, 2004. This decrease of $276.7 million is primarily
the
result of the sale of $177.7 million of securitized manufactured housing
loans
associated with the sale of the Company’s interests in the related
securitization trust, $95.0 million in principal repayments, net of
approximately $6.8 million of funds held in defeasance of certain commercial
mortgage loans at September 30, 2005, on the securitized finance receivables
and
$4.5 million of additions to the allowance for loan losses. During the three
months ended September 30, 2005, three securitized commercial loans with
a
principal balance of $6.8 million were prepaid, including yield maintenance
payments of $0.6 million. These payments have been deposited in a fund to
support the future payments to holders of the securitization financing bonds
which were collateralized by these prepaid loans.
12
Debt
securities decreased to $2.2 million at September 30, 2005 compared to $206.4
million at December 31, 2004. This decrease of $204.2 million is primarily
the
result of the derecognition of $189.5 million of a security supported by
manufactured housing loans associated with the sale of the Company’s interests
in the related securitization trust, $11.6 million in principal paydowns
on the
securitized finance receivables, and $1.0 million related to realized market
valuation adjustments resulting from the sale of the security.
Securities.
Securities decreased by $8.8 million, to $78.9 million at September 30, 2005
from $87.7 million at December 31, 2004 due primarily to principal payments
of
$46.9 million, the sale of $6.7 million of equity securities and $0.9 million
of
market value adjustments, which was partially offset by the purchase of $45.3
million of short-term debt securities during 2005.
Other
investments.
Other
investments at September 30, 2005 consist of delinquent property tax receivables
and a delinquent property tax security. Other investments decreased from
$7.6
million at December 31, 2004, to $4.5 million at September 30, 2005. This
decrease is primarily the result of cash receipts on the tax liens and related
real estate owned of approximately $2.3 million during the year as well as
net
market value adjustments of the tax lien security of $1.6 million. These
decreases were partially offset by interest accretion on the tax lien security
of $0.6 million, which occurred prior to the security being placed on
non-accrual during the second quarter of 2005.
Other
loans.
Other
loans decreased by $2.3 million from $5.6 million at December 31, 2004, to
$3.3
million at September 30, 2005, principally as the result of the sale of
$1.7 million of mezzanine loans and principal payments of $0.9 million during
the nine month period.
Securitization
financing. Non-recourse
securitization financing decreased $639.9 million, from $1,177.3 million
at
December 31, 2004 to $537.4 million at September 30, 2005. This decrease
was
primarily a result of derecognition of $363.9 million of securitization
financing resulting from the sale of the Company’s interests in two
securitizations, and the redemption by the Company of the $195.7 million
of
outstanding bonds, which were replaced by repurchase agreement financing
with a
balance of $149.8 million at September 30, 2005. The balance was also reduced
by
approximately $81.3 million of principal payments on the bonds. These decreases
were partially offset by $1.5 million of net amortization of bond related
discounts, premiums and deferred costs during the nine months ended September
30, 2005.
The
repurchase agreement securitization financing increased from zero at December
31, 2004 to $149.8 million at September 30, 2005. This increase resulted
from
the partial financing of the redemption of $195.7 million of non-recourse
securitization financing bonds with $170.7 million of repurchase agreements
during the second quarter of 2005. The balance of the repurchase agreements
was
reduced by net repayments of approximately $20.9 million.
Repurchase
Agreements. Repurchase
agreements decreased from $70.5 million at December 31, 2004 to $27.8 million
at
September 30, 2005. This decrease related to net payments on the repurchase
agreements of $42.7 million.
Shareholders’
equity.
Shareholders’ equity increased to $149.5 million at September 30, 2005 from
$148.8 million at December 31, 2004. This increase was primarily the result
of net income of $8.6 million. The increase was partially offset by a preferred
stock charge of $4.0 million and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive
income of $3.9 million. The decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income
related to the recognition of an unrealized gain of $4.3 million on a
securitized finance receivable sold during the year and the amortization
of $0.6
million of unrealized hedging losses.
13
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
(amounts
in thousands except per share information)
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
2,614
|
$
|
6,394
|
$
|
9,803
|
$
|
18,348
|
|||||
Net
interest income after provision for losses
|
992
|
5,103
|
5,256
|
910
|
|||||||||
Impairment
charges
|
(207
|
)
|
(162
|
)
|
(2,259
|
)
|
(9,569
|
)
|
|||||
(Loss)
gain on sale of investments, net
|
(48
|
)
|
(3,147
|
)
|
9,802
|
(3,143
|
)
|
||||||
Other
(expense) income
|
(1,026
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
331
|
(264
|
)
|
||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(1,610
|
)
|
(1,847
|
)
|
(4,500
|
)
|
(6,330
|
)
|
|||||
Net
(loss) income
|
(1,899
|
)
|
(56
|
)
|
8,630
|
(18,396
|
)
|
||||||
Preferred
stock charge
|
(1,381
|
)
|
(4,010
|
)
|
(527
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
(loss) income to common shareholders
|
(3,235
|
)
|
(1,437
|
)
|
4,620
|
(18,923
|
)
|
||||||
Net
(loss) income per common share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
$
|
0.38
|
$
|
(1.70
|
)
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2005 Compared to Three Months Ended September
30,
2004.
Net
loss and net loss per common share increased during the three months ended
September 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. The increase in
net
loss is primarily the result of a $3.8 million decrease in net interest income,
as discussed below, and an increase in other expense of $1.0 million. These
increases were offset by a $3.1 million decrease in loss on sale of investments,
which was related to the sale of a portfolio of tax lien receivables in the
third quarter of 2004. The increase in other expense is a result of accruing
for
contingencies and related items on prior asset sales and interest income.
Net
interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2005 decreased to
$2.6
million from $6.4 million for the same period in 2004 primarily due to the
reduction in interest earning assets resulting from sales of securitized
finance
receivables, and the decline in the net interest spread on interest earning
assets. The decline in net interest spread is discussed further in connection
with the Average
Balances and Effective Interest Rates
table
below.
Loss
on
sale of investments decreased by $3.1 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2005 compared to the same period last year. The loss in the
third
quarter of 2004 resulted from the sale of a pool of tax lien receivables.
Other
expense increased by $1.0 million to $1.0 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2005 primarily as a result of the Company’s accrual for certain
contingencies related to prior asset sales and related items.
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2005 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30,
2004.
Net
income increased to $8.6 million from a net loss of $18.4 million for the
nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in net
income is primarily the result of a decrease of provision for loan losses
of
$12.9 million, a decrease of impairment charges of $7.3 million, an increase
in
gain on sale of investments of $12.9 million, and a decrease in net interest
income of $8.5 million.
Net
income to common shareholders increased to $4.6 million, or $0.38 per basic
and
diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 from a net loss
of
$18.9 million, or $1.70 per basic and diluted share, for the same period
in
2004. Net income to common shareholders increased less than net income due
to
the $3.5 million increase in the preferred stock charge.
Net
interest income decreased by $8.5 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 due a decline in
interest earning assets from the sale of securitized finance receivables,
and a
decline in the overall net interest spread on interest earning assets compared
to the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The decline in net interest
spread
is discussed further in connection with the Average
Balances and Effective Interest Rates
table
below. Net interest income after provision for loan losses for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 increased to $5.3 million from
14
$0.9
million for the same period in 2004. This increase was primarily the result
of a
$12.9 million decrease in provision for loan losses as a result of the sale
of
the Company’s investment in securitized finance receivables collateralized by
manufactured housing loans.
Impairment
charges decreased by $7.3 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005
from the same period last year. This decrease was primarily a result of losses
experienced in 2004 on debt securities pledged as securitized finance
receivables and comprised largely of manufactured housing loans. This security
was sold during the second quarter of 2005. The impairment charges for the
nine
months ended September 30, 2005 primarily relate to a $1.7 million impairment
charge on the Company’s investment in delinquent property tax receivables during
the period.
Gain
on
sales of investments increased by $12.9 million due primarily to the recognition
of gains of $8.2 million and $1.4 million on the sale of securitized finance
receivables and healthcare mezzanine loans, respectively, during the nine
months
ended September 30, 2005. The loss for the same period in 2004 relates primarily
to the sale of a pool of tax lien receivables.
General
and administrative expense decreased by $1.8 million for the nine months
ended
September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The decline in general
and administrative expenses during the period is due primarily to the reduction
in expenses at the Company’s tax lien servicing operation and a decline in
litigation related expenses.
Preferred
stock charge increased by $3.5 million to $4.0 million for the nine months
ended
September 30, 2005 from $0.5 million for the same period in 2004. The 2004
balance reflects the benefit realized on the recapitalization that was completed
during 2004.
15
The
following table summarizes the average balances of interest-earning assets
and
their average effective yields, along with the average interest-bearing
liabilities and the related average effective interest rates, for each of
the
periods presented.
Average
Balances and Effective Interest Rates
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Average
Balance
|
Effective
Rate
|
Average
Balance
|
Effective
Rate
|
Average
Balance
|
Effective
Rate
|
Average
Balance
|
Effective
Rate
|
|||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets(1):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securitized
finance receivables(2)
(3)
|
$
|
788,361
|
7.34
|
%
|
$
|
1,583,883
|
7.39
|
%
|
$
|
986,768
|
7.21
|
%
|
$
|
1,686,373
|
7.48
|
%
|
|||||||||
Securities
|
81,894
|
4.66
|
%
|
20,205
|
8.02
|
%
|
75,707
|
5.09
|
%
|
24,275
|
7.92
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Cash
|
16,543
|
2.99
|
%
|
24,651
|
1.23
|
%
|
35,173
|
2.47
|
%
|
16,308
|
1.00
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Other
loans
|
3,586
|
16.66
|
%
|
6,407
|
11.29
|
%
|
5,722
|
14.36
|
%
|
7,130
|
9.61
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Other
investments(4)
|
-
|
-
|
%
|
-
|
-
|
%
|
4,050
|
19.83
|
%
|
-
|
-
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
$
|
890,384
|
7.05
|
%
|
$
|
1,635,146
|
7.32
|
%
|
$
|
1,107,420
|
7.00
|
%
|
$
|
1,734,086
|
7.
43
|
%
|
|||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse
securitization financing(3)
|
$
|
546,030
|
8.00
|
%
|
$
|
1,486,352
|
6.16
|
%
|
$
|
808,389
|
7.20
|
%
|
$
|
1,580,285
|
6.42
|
%
|
|||||||||
Recourse
debt secured by securitized finance receivables
|
160,100
|
3.60
|
%
|
-
|
-
|
%
|
94,560
|
3.45
|
%
|
-
|
-
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
39,646
|
3.61
|
%
|
16,293
|
1.72
|
%
|
53,713
|
3.08
|
%
|
19,724
|
1.51
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Senior
notes
|
-
|
-
|
%
|
823
|
11.93
|
%
|
-
|
-
|
%
|
2,649
|
9.90
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
$
|
745,776
|
6.82
|
%
|
$
|
1,503,468
|
6.11
|
%
|
$
|
956,662
|
6.60
|
%
|
$
|
1,602,658
|
6.37
|
%
|
|||||||||
Net
interest spread on all investments(3)
|
0.23
|
%
|
1.21
|
%
|
0.40
|
%
|
1.07
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
yield on average interest-earning assets(3)
|
1.31
|
%
|
1.69
|
%
|
1.29
|
%
|
1.55
|
%
|
(1) Average
balances exclude adjustments made in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities,” to record available-for-sale securities at fair
value.
(2) Average
balances exclude funds held by trustees of $2,479 and $211 for the three
months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $988 and $352 for the
nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
(3) Effective
rates are calculated excluding non-interest related collateralized bond
expenses. If included, the net interest spread on all investments would have
been 0.02% and 1.03% for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, and 0.24% and 0.90% for the nine months ended September 30,
2005
and 2004, respectively. The net yield on average interest-earning assets,
had
the non-interest related expenses been included, would have been 1.17% and
1.56%
for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and
1.18%
and 1.41% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
(4) Other
investments is comprised of delinquent property tax receivables which were
on
non-accrual during all of 2004 and beginning in June 2005.
The
net
interest spread decreased 98 basis points to 23 basis points for the three
months ended September 30, 2005, from 121 basis points for the same period
in
2004 (each basis point is 0.01%). The net interest spread for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 decreased by 67 basis points relative to the same
period in 2004, to 40 basis points from 107 basis points. The decrease in
the
net interest spread for the three months ended September 30, 2005 versus
the
same period in 2004 is due to declining yields on interest-earning assets,
due
principally from decreased income as a result of the sale of approximately
$367.2 million of securitized finance receivables during the nine months
ended
September 30, 2005, and the sale of approximately $219.2 million in receivables
during the fourth quarter of 2004. The net interest spread contribution
16
for
the
receivables sold was 0.28% and 0.26%, respectively during the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2004 and none and 0.21% for the three and
nine
month periods ended September 30, 2005. The proceeds from the sale of these
investments have generally been invested in cash and short-term securities.
The
following table summarizes the amount of change in interest income and interest
expense due to changes in interest rates versus changes in volume. Any change
in
interest income and interest expense, which is due to changes in both volume
and
rate but cannot be specifically attributed to either, has been allocated
proportionally between rate and volume. The following tables exclude
non-interest related securitization financing expenses and other interest
expenses.
Three
Months Ended September 31, 2005
vs. 2004
|
||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Rate
|
Volume
|
Total
|
|||||||
Securitized
finance receivables
|
$
|
(185
|
)
|
$
|
(14,604
|
)
|
$
|
(14,789
|
)
|
|
Securities
|
(232
|
)
|
781
|
549
|
||||||
Other
investments
|
80
|
(32
|
)
|
48
|
||||||
Other
loans
|
66
|
(98
|
)
|
(32
|
)
|
|||||
Total
interest income
|
(271
|
)
|
(13,953
|
)
|
(14,224
|
)
|
||||
Securitization
financing
|
2,863
|
(13,358
|
)
|
(10,495
|
)
|
|||||
Repurchase
agreements and senior notes
|
104
|
164
|
268
|
|||||||
Total
interest expense
|
2,967
|
(13,194
|
)
|
(10,227
|
)
|
|||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
(3,238
|
)
|
$
|
(759
|
)
|
$
|
(3,997
|
)
|
Nine
Months Ended September 31, 2005
vs. 2004
|
||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Rate
|
Volume
|
Total
|
|||||||
Securitized
finance receivables
|
$
|
(3,255
|
)
|
$
|
(37,966
|
)
|
$
|
(41,221
|
)
|
|
Securities
|
(671
|
)
|
2,121
|
1,450
|
||||||
Other
investments
|
791
|
342
|
1,133
|
|||||||
Other
loans
|
218
|
(116
|
)
|
102
|
||||||
Total
interest income
|
(2,917
|
)
|
(35,619
|
)
|
(38,536
|
)
|
||||
Securitization
financing
|
4,433
|
(34,372
|
)
|
(29,939
|
)
|
|||||
Repurchase
agreements and senior notes
|
301
|
533
|
834
|
|||||||
Total
interest expense
|
4,734
|
(33,839
|
)
|
(29,105
|
)
|
|||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
(7,651
|
)
|
$
|
(1,780
|
)
|
$
|
(9,431
|
)
|
The
decrease in the Company’s net interest spread for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2005 compared to the prior year period can also be attributed
to
decreased income as a result of the sale of securitized finance receivables
during the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Interest
Income and Interest-Earning Assets.
At
September 30, 2005, $646.3 million of the investment portfolio consisted
of
loans and securities which pay a fixed-rate of interest, and approximately
$156.3 million of the investment portfolio was comprised of loans and securities
that have coupon rates which adjust over time (subject to certain periodic
and
lifetime limitations) in conjunction with changes in short-term interest
rates.
The Company finances its investment portfolio principally with non-recourse
securitization financing, but during the second quarter of 2005 added $165.7
million of
17
repurchase
agreement financing to fund the redemption of the outstanding bonds of one
securitization. At September 30, 2005, approximately $531.1 million of
fixed-rate bonds and no adjustable rate bonds were outstanding, having been
replaced by repurchase agreement financing as discussed above. The following
table presents a breakdown, by principal balance, of the Company’s securitized
finance receivables and adjustable-rate mortgage (“ARM”) and fixed mortgage
securities by type of underlying loan. This table excludes treasury bills,
commercial paper, other investments and other loans, as such assets are
classified in the Company’s financial statements.
Investment
Portfolio Composition(1)
($
in millions)
|
LIBOR
Based ARM Loans
|
CMT
Based ARM Loans
|
Other
Indices Based ARM Loans
|
Fixed-Rate
Loans
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
2004,
Quarter 3
|
$
|
196.1
|
$
|
38.8
|
$
|
39.5
|
$
|
1,335.8
|
$
|
1,610.2
|
||||||
2004,
Quarter 4
|
176.7
|
34.5
|
37.6
|
1,112.8
|
1,361.6
|
|||||||||||
2005,
Quarter 1
|
163.7
|
32.9
|
34.9
|
1,069.1
|
1,300.6
|
|||||||||||
2005,
Quarter 2
|
115.8
|
23.0
|
33.0
|
699.1
|
870.9
|
|||||||||||
2005,
Quarter 3
|
$ |
104.8
|
$ |
20.7
|
$ |
30.8
|
$ |
646.3
|
$ |
802.6
|
(1)
|
Includes
only the principal amount of securitized finance receivables, ARM
securities and fixed-rate mortgage
securities.
|
Credit
Exposures.
The
Company invests in non-recourse securitization financing or pass-through
securitization structures. Generally these securitization structures use
over-collateralization, subordination, third-party guarantees, reserve funds,
bond insurance, mortgage pool insurance or any combination of the foregoing
as a
form of credit enhancement. The Company generally has retained a limited
portion
of the direct credit risk in these securities. In most instances the Company
retained the “first-loss” credit risk on pools of loans that it
securitized.
The
following table summarizes the aggregate principal amount of securitized
finance
receivables and securities outstanding; the direct credit exposure retained
by
the Company (represented by the amount of over-collateralization pledged
and
subordinated securities owned by the Company), net of the credit reserves
and
discounts maintained by the Company for such exposure; and the actual credit
losses incurred for each year.
The
table
excludes other forms of credit enhancement from which the Company benefits,
and
based upon the performance of the underlying loans, may provide additional
protection against losses. These additional protections include loss
reimbursement guarantees with a remaining balance of $24.3 million and a
remaining deductible aggregating $0.5 million on $25.1 million of securitized
single-family mortgage loans which are subject to such reimbursement agreements;
guarantees aggregating $17.6 million on $182.6 million of securitized commercial
mortgage loans, whereby losses on such loans would need to exceed the respective
guarantee amount before the Company would incur credit losses; and $80.9
million
of securitized single-family mortgage loans which are subject to various
mortgage pool insurance policies whereby losses would need to exceed the
remaining stop loss of at least 84% on such policies before the Company would
incur losses.
Credit
Reserves and Actual Credit Losses
($
in millions)
|
Outstanding
Loan Principal Balance
|
Credit
Exposure, Net
Of
Credit Reserves
|
Actual
Credit
Losses
|
Credit
Exposure, Net to Outstanding Loan Balance
|
|||||||||
2004,
Quarter 3
|
$
|
1,613.4
|
$
|
39.8
|
$
|
6.5
|
$
|
2.47
|
%
|
||||
2004,
Quarter 4
|
1,296.5
|
39.9
|
4.6
|
3.08
|
%
|
||||||||
2005,
Quarter 1
|
1,245.8
|
39.4
|
2.6
|
3.16
|
%
|
||||||||
2005,
Quarter 2
|
828.9
|
29.0
|
0.5
|
3.50
|
%
|
||||||||
2005,
Quarter 3
|
$
|
786.5
|
$ |
29.3
|
$ |
0.4
|
$ |
3.73
|
%
|
The
following table summarizes commercial mortgage loan delinquencies as a
percentage of the outstanding commercial securitized finance receivables
balance
for those securities in which the Company has retained a portion of the direct
credit risk. The delinquencies as a percentage of the outstanding securitized
finance receivables balance have decreased to 8.04% at September 30, 2005
from
10.11% at September 30, 2004 primarily due to seventeen commercial loans
which
became
18
delinquent
in 2004. Of these seventeen loans, fourteen were low income housing tax credit
(“LIHTC”) loans with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $70 million which
were repaid in full in July and August 2004. The increase in delinquencies
from
7.33% at June 30, 2005 to 8.04% at September 30, 2005 resulted from three
loans
that became delinquent during the third quarter of 2005, one of which was
paid
off subsequent to the end of the quarter and had a principal balance of
approximately $7.4 million. Excluding
this loan, total delinquent commercial loans as a percentage of all commercial
loans outstanding would have declined to 6.79% as of September 30, 2005.
The Company monitors and evaluates its exposure to credit losses and
has
established reserves based upon anticipated losses, general economic conditions
and trends in the investment portfolio. At September 30, 2005, management
believes the level of credit reserves is appropriate for currently existing
losses.
Commercial
Loan Delinquency Statistics(1)(2)
30
to 60 days delinquent
|
60
to 90 days delinquent
|
90
days and over delinquent(2)
|
Total
|
||||||||||
2004,
Quarter 3
|
2.82
|
%
|
0.45
|
%
|
6.84
|
%
|
10.11
|
%
|
|||||
2004,
Quarter 4
|
-
|
%
|
-
|
%
|
7.96
|
%
|
7.96
|
%
|
|||||
2005,
Quarter 1
|
0.10
|
%
|
0.20
|
%
|
5.76
|
%
|
6.06
|
%
|
|||||
2005,
Quarter 2
|
0.84
|
%
|
0.71
|
%
|
5.78
|
%
|
7.33
|
%
|
|||||
2005,
Quarter 3
|
-
|
%
|
1.50
|
%
|
6.54
|
%
|
8.04
|
%
|
(1) Excludes
other investments and other loans.
(2) Includes
foreclosures, repossessions and real estate owned.
General
and Administrative Expense. The
following table presents a breakdown of general and administrative expense.
The
Company has incurred $0.5 million of professional fees for all of 2005 related
to the litigation discussed in Note 10 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements of which approximately $0.4 million was incurred during the quarter
ended September 30, 2005. In addition, the Company incurred approximately
$0.3
million of accounting fees related to the termination of the Company’s prior
independent accounting firm. The sequential decline in the servicing operation’s
general and administrative expenses is due to the reduction in headcount
related
to the collection of delinquent property tax receivables.
($
in thousands)
|
Servicing
|
Corporate/Investment
Portfolio Management
|
Total
|
|||||||
2004,
Quarter 3
|
$
|
930.3
|
$
|
916.8
|
$
|
1,847.1
|
||||
2004,
Quarter 4
|
557.5
|
859.8
|
1,417.3
|
|||||||
2005,
Quarter 1
|
525.2
|
966.4
|
1,491.6
|
|||||||
2005,
Quarter 2
|
360.7
|
1,037.7
|
1,398.4
|
|||||||
2005,
Quarter 3
|
$ |
288.2
|
$ |
1,321.9
|
$ |
1,610.1
|
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No.
123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (FAS 123R). This statement supersedes
APB Opinion No. 25 and its related implementation guidance. The statement
establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity
exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services. This statement focuses
primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee
services in share-based payment transactions. The most significant change
resulting from this statement is the requirement for public companies to
expense
employee share-based payments under fair value as originally introduced in
SFAS
No. 123. This statement is effective for public companies as of the beginning
of
the first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005, or December
15, 2005 for small business issuers. The Company will adopt this statement
effective January 1, 2006. The Company presented the amount that would have
been
recorded in general and administrative expense for the quarter and nine month
period ended September 30, 2005 if the Company had adopted the provisions
of FAS
123R in Note 11 above.
In
June
2004, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force Abstract 03-1, "The Meaning
of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments"
("EITF 03-1"). EITF 03-1 provides authoritative guidance regarding
19
determining
when an investment is considered impaired and the impairment is
other-than-temporary. EITF 03-1 requires that the Company evaluate whether
an
impairment is other-than-temporary, and, if the impairment is
other-than-temporary, recognize an impairment loss equal to the excess of
the
amortized cost over the estimated fair value of the investment. In September
2004 the FASB delayed the effective date of paragraphs 10-20 of this issue.
These paragraphs give guidance on how to evaluate and recognize an impairment
loss that is other-than-temporary. The delay does not suspend the requirement
to
recognize other than temporary impairments as required by existing authoritative
literature. On July 5, 2005, the FASB decided not to provide additional guidance
on the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and stated that the proposed
FASB Staff Position ("FSP") EITF Issue No. 03-1-a, "Implementation Guidance
for
the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No. 03-1," will be issued as
final. The final FSP will supersede EITF 03-1. The Company does not expect
the
adoption of the FSP, as contained in its current draft form, to have a material
effect on our consolidated financial condition, consolidated results of
operations, or liquidity.
NON-GAAP
INFORMATION ON SECURITIZED FINANCE RECEIVABLES AND NON-RECOURSE SECURITIZATION
FINANCING
The
Company finances its securitized finance receivables principally through
the
issuance of non-recourse securitization financing. The Company presents in
its
condensed consolidated financial statements the securitized finance receivables
as assets, and the associated securitization financing as a liability. Because
the securitization financing is recourse only to the finance receivables
pledged, and is, therefore, not a general obligation of the Company, the
risk to
the Company on its investment in securitized finance receivables is limited
to
its net investment (i.e.,
the
excess of the finance receivables pledged over the non-recourse securitization
financing). This excess is often referred to as overcollateralization. The
purpose of the information presented in this section is to present the
securitized finance receivables on a net investment basis, and to provide
estimated fair value information using various assumptions on such net
investment. The Company monitors and evaluates the performance of these
securitization transactions based on the Company’s net investment in such
transactions, and believes the tables below will assist the investor in
understanding the Company’s actual investment in these transactions, the credit
risk which the Company has retained on its investments, the performance of
these
investments, and the estimated fair value of these investments based on the
assumptions set forth below.
In
the
tables below, the “principal balance of net investment” in securitized finance
receivables represents the excess of the principal balance of the collateral
pledged over the outstanding balance of the associated non-recourse
securitization financing owned by third parties. The “amortized cost basis of
net investment” is principal balance of net investment plus or minus premiums
and discounts and related costs. The Company generally has sold the investment
grade classes of the securitization financing to third parties, and has retained
the portion of the securitization financing that is below investment grade.
The
Company estimates the fair value of its net investment in collateralized
bond
securities as the present value of the projected cash flow from the collateral,
adjusted for the impact of and assumed level of future prepayments and credit
losses, less the projected principal and interest due on the bonds owned
by
third parties. The Company master services the collateral for MCA One Series
1.
Structured Asset Securitization Corporation (SASCO) Series 2002-9 is
master-serviced by Wells Fargo Bank. CCA One Series 2 and Series 3 are
master-serviced by Bank of New York. Monthly payment reports for those
securities master-serviced by the Company may be found on the Company’s website
at www.dynexcapital.com.
Below
is
a summary at September 30, 2005, by each series of the Company’s net investment
in securitized finance receivables where the fair value exceeds $0.5 million.
The following tables show the Company’s net investment in each of the securities
presented below on both a principal balance and amortized cost basis, as
those
terms are defined above. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements of the Company present the securitized finance receivables as
an
asset, and present the associated securitization financing bond obligation
as a
liability. In addition, as the securitizations currently included in the
Company’s investment portfolio contain loans and are not themselves securities,
the Company carries those investments at amortized cost. As a result, the
table
below is not meant to present the Company’s investment in
20
securitized
finance receivables or the securitization financing in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles applicable to the Company’s transactions. See
below for a reconciliation of the amounts included in the table to the Company’s
condensed consolidated financial statements.
(amounts
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Collateralized
Bond Series(1)
|
Collateral
Type
|
Principal
Balance of Securitized Finance Receivables Pledged
|
Principal
Balance of Securitization Financing Outstanding to Third
Parties
|
Principal
Balance of Net Investment
|
Amortized
Cost Basis of Net Investment
|
|||||||||||
SASCO
2002-9(2)
|
Single family loans |
$
|
177,754
|
$
|
149,823
|
$
|
27,931
|
$
|
31,012
|
|||||||
MCA
One Series 1
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
63,511
|
58,787
|
4,724
|
1,416
|
|||||||||||
CCA
One Series 2
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
200,878
|
181,770
|
19,108
|
14,282
|
|||||||||||
CCA
One Series 3
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
324,555
|
288,435
|
36,120
|
45,433
|
|||||||||||
$
|
766,698
|
$
|
678,815
|
$
|
87,883
|
$
|
92,143
|
(1)
|
MCA
stands for Multifamily Capital Access One, Inc. (now known as Commercial
Capital Access One, Inc.); and CCA stands for Commercial Capital
Access
One, Inc. Each such entity is a wholly-owned limited purpose subsidiary
of
the Company. SASCO stands for Structured Asset Securitization
Corporation.
|
(2)
|
The
securitization financing bonds for SASCO 2002-9 were acquired by
the
Company and recourse repurchase agreement financing was used to
finance
the acquisition of the bonds. The amounts included in this table
represent
the principal amount of repurchase agreement
financing.
|
The
following table reconciles the balances presented in the table above with
the
amounts included for securitized finance receivables and securitization
financing in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Securitized
Finance Receivables
|
Securitization
Financing
|
|||||
Principal
balances per the above table
|
$
|
766,698
|
$
|
678,815
|
|||
Principal
balance of security excluded from above table
|
2,092
|
2,133
|
|||||
Premiums
and discounts
|
(1,785
|
)
|
2,645
|
||||
Unrealized
gain
|
51
|
_
|
|||||
Defeasance
payments held by the trust
|
6,836
|
_
|
|||||
Accrued
interest and other
|
5,489
|
3,615
|
|||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(17,801
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Balance
per consolidated financial statements
|
$
|
761,580
|
$
|
687,208
|
The
following table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s net investment in
collateralized bond securities, the various assumptions made in estimating
value
and the cash flow received from such net investment during the nine months
ended
September 30, 2005. As the Company does not present its investment in
securitization finance receivables on a net investment basis, the table below
is
not meant to present the Company’s investment in securitized finance receivables
or securitization financing in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles applicable to the Company’s transactions.
21
Fair
Value Assumptions
|
(amounts
in thousands)
|
|||||
Collateralized
Bond
Series
|
Weighted-average
prepayment speeds
|
Losses
|
Projected
cash flow
Termination
date
|
Fair
value of net
investment(1)
|
Cash
flows received in 2005, net(1)
|
|
SASCO
2002-9
|
30%
CPR
|
0.20%
annually
|
Bonds
called in 2005. Call financed with repurchase agreements
|
32,349
|
3,501
|
|
MCA
One Series 1
|
(2)
|
(4)
|
Anticipated
final maturity in 2018
|
2,413
|
742
|
|
CCA
One Series 2
|
(3)
|
(4)
|
(5)
|
12,973
|
1,280
|
|
CCA
One Series 3
|
(3)
|
(4)
|
(6)
|
19,882
|
276
|
|
$67,617
|
$5,152
|
(1) Calculated
as the net present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at 16%.
Expected cash flows were based on the forward LIBOR curve at September 30,
2005,
and incorporate the resetting of the interest rates on the adjustable rate
assets to a level consistent with projected prevailing rates. Increases or
decreases in interest rates and index levels from those used would impact
the
calculation of fair value, as would differences in actual prepayment speeds
and
credit losses versus the assumptions set forth above. Cash flows received
by the
Company during the nine months ended September 30, 2005, equal to the excess
of
the cash flows received on the collateral pledged, over the cash flow
requirements of the collateralized bond security.
(2)
|
Computed
at 0% CPR until maturity.
|
(3)
|
Computed
at 0% CPR until the respective call
date.
|
(4)
|
Assumes
loans that are 60+ days delinquent liquidate within 6 months at
a 40% loss
severity and all other loans incur losses at 0.8% annually (2.0%
default
rate with a 40% severity).
|
(5)
|
Cashflow
projected to anticipated redemption date in 2011, when outstanding
bonds
would be redeemed at par and the underlying mortgage loans would
be sold
at a price of 101% of par.
|
(6)
|
Cashflow
projected to redemption date in 2009, when outstanding bonds would
be
redeemed at par and the underlying loans would be sold for a price
of 103%
of par.
|
The
above
tables illustrate the Company’s estimated fair value of its net investment in
certain collateralized bond securities. In its consolidated financial
statements, the Company carries its investments at amortized cost. Including
the
recorded allowance for loan losses of $17.8 million, the Company’s net
investment in collateralized bond securities at September 30, 2005 was
approximately $74.4 million. This amount compares to an estimated fair value,
utilizing a discount rate of 16%, of approximately $67.6 million, as set
forth
in the table above. The difference between the $74.4 million in net investment
as included in the consolidated financial statements and the $67.6 million
of
estimated fair value is due to the difference between the estimated fair
value
of such net investment and amortized cost.
The
following table compares the fair value of these investments at various discount
rates, but otherwise using the same assumptions as set forth for the two
immediately preceding tables:
Fair
Value of Net Investment
|
|||||||||||||
Collateralized
Bond Series
|
12%
|
16%
|
20%
|
25%
|
|||||||||
SASCO
2002-9
|
$
|
33,646
|
$
|
32,349
|
$
|
31,246
|
$
|
30,085
|
|||||
MCA
One Series 1
|
2,873
|
2,413
|
2,046
|
1,688
|
|||||||||
CCA
One Series 2
|
15,321
|
12,973
|
11,052
|
9,126
|
|||||||||
CCA
One Series 3
|
22,432
|
19,882
|
17,651
|
15,248
|
|||||||||
$
|
74,272
|
$
|
67,617
|
$
|
61,995
|
$
|
56,147
|
22
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The
Company has historically financed its operations from a variety of sources.
Currently, the Company’s primary source of funding its operations is principally
the cash flow generated from the investment portfolio, which includes net
interest income and principal payments and prepayments on these investments.
From the cash flow on its investment portfolio, the Company funds its operating
overhead costs, including the servicing of its delinquent property tax
receivables, repays any remaining recourse debt, and makes additional
investments. Coupled with its existing available cash resources, the Company
believes that this source is sufficient to fund its short and long-term
operational needs. The Company also believes that it has sufficient access
to
capital to finance its future investment activities.
The
Company’s cash flow from its investment portfolio is subject to fluctuation due
to changes in interest rates, repayment rates and default rates and related
losses. The Company currently has a substantial portion of its available
capital
invested in cash or highly liquid, short-term instruments. At September 30,
2005, this amount was $63.9 million, which represents more than 40% of the
Company’s overall equity capital base. The Company intends to maintain high
levels of liquidity through the end of the year given the lack of compelling
reinvestment opportunities as a result of the absolute low level of interest
rates, the flat yield curve, and the historically tight spreads on fixed
income
instruments.
The
Company announced on November 16, 2005 that it will be redeeming 25% of its
Series D Preferred Stock in the first quarter of 2006. This redemption will
reduce the Series D Preferred Stock outstanding by approximately $14 million,
saving the Company an approximate $1.3 million in dividends annually. The
Board
of Directors of the Company also approved the redemption of up to one million
shares of common stock of the Company upon completion of the redemption of
the
Series D Preferred Stock. The redemption of any shares of common stock is
likely
to occur if alternative uses of the capital are not available and if accretive
to book value per common share. Upon completion of the redemption of the
Preferred Stock, the Company will have an estimated $50 million in remaining
investable capital.
Through
limited-purpose finance subsidiaries, the Company has issued non-recourse
debt
in the form of non-recourse securitization financing to fund the majority
of its
investment portfolio. The obligations under the securitization financing
are
payable solely from the securitized finance receivables and are otherwise
non-recourse to the Company. The maturity of each class of securitization
financing is directly affected by the rate of principal prepayments on the
related collateral and is not subject to margin call risk. Each series is
also
subject to redemption according to specific terms of the respective indentures,
generally on the earlier of a specified date or when the remaining balance
of
the bonds equals 35% or less of the original principal balance of the bonds.
At
September 30, 2005, Dynex had $537.4 million of non-recourse securitization
financing outstanding. Approximately $531 million of the non-recourse
securitization financing carries a fixed rate of interest.
The
Company redeemed approximately $195.7 million of securitization financing
in the
second quarter, financing the redemption of the bonds outstanding with cash
of
$25.0 million and repurchase agreement financing of $170.7 million. As a
result
of paydowns on the associated securitized finance receivables, the remaining
balance of the securitization financing bonds at the end of the third quarter
2005 was $169.9 million. The Company was financing the balance with cash
of
$20.1 million and repurchase agreement financing of approximately $149.8
million. As the redeemed bonds have not been legally extinguished, the Company
could reissue these bonds, generating estimated proceeds of approximately
$170
million, which would be used to repay the repurchase agreement financing,
and
the balance of which would increase the Company’s investable cash.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain
written statements in this Form 10-Q made by the Company that are not historical
fact constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements contained in this Item as
well
as those discussed elsewhere in this Report addressing the results of
operations, our operating performance, events, or developments that we expect
or
anticipate will occur in the future, including statements relating to investment
strategies, net interest income growth, earnings or earnings per share growth,
and market share, as well as statements expressing optimism or pessimism
about
future operating results, are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking
statements are based upon management’s views and assumptions as of the date of
this Report, regarding future events and operating performance and are
applicable only as of the dates of such statements. Such forward-looking
statements may involve factors that could cause the actual results of the
Company to differ
23
materially
from historical results or from any results expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. The Company cautions the public not to place
undue
reliance on forward-looking statements, which may be based on assumptions
and
anticipated events that do not materialize.
Factors
that may cause actual results to differ from historical results or from any
results expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include the
following:
Economic
Conditions.
The
Company is affected by general economic conditions. An increase in the risk
of
defaults and credit risk resulting from an economic slowdown or recession
or
other factors could result in a decrease in the value of the Company’s
investments and the over-collateralization associated with its securitization
transactions. These changes could have an effect on the Company’s financial
performance and the performance on the Company’s securitized loan pools. As a
result of the Company being heavily invested in short-term high quality
investments, a worsening economy may potentially benefit the Company by creating
opportunities for the Company to invest in assets that become distressed
as a
result of the worsening conditions or, if in response to these conditions,
the
Federal Reserve begins to lower the Federal Funds Rate and the yield curve
steepens.
Investment
Portfolio Cash Flow.
Cash
flows from the investment portfolio fund the Company’s operations and repayments
of outstanding debt, and are subject to fluctuation due to changes in interest
rates, repayment rates and default rates and related losses. Cash flows from
the
investment portfolio are likely to sequentially decline until the Company
meaningfully begins to reinvest its capital. There can be no assurances that
the
Company will be able to find suitable investment alternatives for its capital,
nor can there be assurances that the Company will meet its reinvestment and
return hurdles.
Defaults.
Defaults
by borrowers on loans securitized by the Company may have an adverse impact
on
the Company’s financial performance, if actual credit losses differ materially
from estimates made by the Company or exceed reserves for losses recorded
in the
financial statements. The allowance for loan losses is calculated on the
basis
of historical experience and management’s best estimates. Actual default rates
or loss severity may differ from the Company’s estimate as a result of economic
conditions. Actual defaults on adjustable-rate mortgage loans may increase
during a rising interest rate environment. In addition, commercial mortgage
loans are generally large dollar balance loans, and a significant loan default
may have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial results.
Third-party
Servicers.
Third-party servicers service the majority of the Company’s investment
portfolio. To the extent that these servicers are financially impaired, the
performance of the Company’s investment portfolio may deteriorate, and defaults
and credit losses may be greater than estimated. In addition, third-party
servicers are generally obligated to advance scheduled principal and interest
on
a loan if such loan is securitized, and to the extent the third-party servicer
fails to make this advance, the Company may be required to make the advance.
The
actual credit losses experienced by the Company are in large part influenced
by
the quality of servicing by these third-party servicers.
Prepayments.
Prepayments by borrowers on loans securitized by the Company may have an
adverse
impact on the Company’s financial performance. Prepayments are expected to
increase during a declining interest rate or flat yield curve environment.
The
Company’s exposure to rapid prepayments is primarily (i) the faster amortization
of premium on the investments and, to the extent applicable, amortization
of
bond discount, and (ii) the replacement of investments in its portfolio with
lower yielding investments.
Interest
Rate Fluctuations.
The
Company’s income and cash flow depends on its ability to earn greater interest
on its investments than the interest cost to finance these investments. Interest
rates in the markets served by the Company generally rise or fall with interest
rates as a whole. A majority of the Company’s investments, including loans and
securities currently pledged as securitized finance receivables and securities,
are fixed-rate. The Company currently finances these fixed-rate assets through
non-recourse securitization financing and repurchase agreements, approximately
$17 million of which is variable rate and resets monthly. Financing fixed-rate
assets with variable-rate bonds exposes the Company to reductions in income
and
cash flow in a period of rising interest rates. In addition, a portion of
the
investments held by the Company are adjustable-rate securitized finance
receivables. These investments are financed through non-recourse long-term
securitization financing and recourse repurchase agreements, which reset
monthly. The net interest spread for these investments could decrease during
a
period of rapidly rising short-term interest rates, since the investments
generally have interest rates which reset on a delayed basis and have periodic
interest rate caps; the related borrowing has no delayed resets or such interest
rate caps.
24
Competition.
The
financial services industry is a highly competitive market in which we compete
with a number of institutions with greater financial resources. In purchasing
portfolio investments and in issuing securities, we compete with other mortgage
REITs, investment banking firms, savings and loan associations, commercial
banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, federal agencies and other
entities, many of which have greater financial resources and a lower cost
of
capital than we do. Increased competition in the market and our competitors
greater financial resources have adversely affected the Company, and may
continue to do so. Competition may also continue to keep pressure on spreads
resulting in the Company being unable to reinvest its capital at a satisfactory
risk-adjusted basis.
Regulatory
Changes.
The
Company’s businesses as of and for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 were not
subject to any material federal or state regulation or licensing requirements.
However, changes in existing laws and regulations or in the interpretation
thereof, or the introduction of new laws and regulations, could adversely
affect
the Company and the performance of the Company’s securitized loan pools or its
ability to collect on its delinquent property tax receivables. The Company
is a
REIT and is required to meet certain tests in order to maintain its REIT
status
as described in the discussion of “Federal Income Tax Considerations” in its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. If the Company
should fail to maintain its REIT status, it would not be able to hold certain
investments and would be subject to income taxes.
Market
risk generally represents the risk of loss that may result from the potential
change in the value of a financial instrument due to fluctuations in interest
and foreign exchange rates and in equity and commodity prices. Market risk
is
inherent to both derivative and non-derivative financial instruments.
Accordingly, the scope of the Company’s market risk management extends beyond
derivatives to include all market risk sensitive financial instruments. As
a
financial services company, net interest margin comprises the primary component
of the Company’s earnings. Additionally, cash flow from the investment portfolio
represents the primary component of the Company’s incoming cash flow. The
Company is subject to risk resulting from interest rate fluctuations to the
extent that there is a gap between the amount of the Company’s interest-earning
assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid, mature
or re-price within specified periods. While certain investments may perform
poorly in an increasing or decreasing interest rate environment, other
investments may perform well, and others may not be impacted at
all.
The
Company focuses on the sensitivity of its cash flow, and measures such
sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Changes in interest rates are defined
as instantaneous, parallel, and sustained interest rate movements in 100
basis
point increments. The Company estimates its net interest margin cash flow
for
the next twenty-four months assuming interest rates follow the forward LIBOR
curve (based on ninety-day Eurodollar futures contracts) at September 30,
2005.
Once the base case has been estimated, cash flows are projected for each
of the
defined interest rate scenarios. Those scenario results are then compared
against the base case to determine the estimated change to cash
flow.
The
following table summarizes the Company’s net interest margin cash flow
sensitivity analysis at September 30, 2005. This analysis represents
management’s estimate of the percentage change in net interest margin cash flow
given a shift in interest rates, as discussed above. Other investments are
excluded from this analysis because they are not interest rate sensitive.
The
“Base” case represents the interest rate environment as it existed at September
30, 2005. At September 30, 2005, one-month LIBOR was 3.86% and six-month
LIBOR
was 4.23%. The analysis is heavily dependent upon the assumptions used in
the
model. The effect of changes in future interest rates, the shape of the yield
curve or the mix of assets and liabilities may cause actual results to differ
significantly from the modeled results. In addition, certain financial
instruments provide a degree of “optionality.” The most significant option
affecting the Company’s portfolio is the borrowers’ option to prepay the loans.
The model applies prepayment rate assumptions representing management’s estimate
of prepayment activity on a projected basis for each collateral pool in the
investment portfolio. The model applies the same prepayment rate assumptions
for
all five cases indicated below. The extent to which borrowers utilize the
ability to exercise
25
their
option may cause actual results to significantly differ from the analysis.
Furthermore, the projected results assume no additions or subtractions to
the
Company’s portfolio, and no change to the Company’s liability structure.
Historically, there have been significant changes in the Company’s assets and
liabilities, and there are likely to be such changes in the future.
Basis
Point
Increase
(Decrease)
in
Interest Rates
|
Projected
Change in Net
Interest
Margin
Cash
Flow From
Base
Case
|
Projected
Change in Value, Expressed as a Percentage of Shareholders’
Equity
|
||
+200
|
(9.1)%
|
(1.7)%
|
||
+100
|
(4.0)%
|
(0.7)%
|
||
Base
|
-
|
-
|
||
-100
|
1.5%
|
0.3%
|
||
-200
|
2.9%
|
0.5%
|
The
Company’s interest rate rise is related both to the rate of change in short-term
interest rates and to the level of short-term interest rates. Approximately
$156
million of the Company’s investment portfolio as of September 30, 2005 is
comprised of loans or securities that have coupon rates which adjust over
time
(subject to certain periodic and lifetime limitations) in conjunction with
changes in short-term interest rates. Approximately 65% and 13% of the
adjustable rate loans underlying the Company’s adjustable rate securities and
securitized finance receivables are indexed to and reset based upon the level
of
six-month LIBOR and one-year CMT, respectively.
Generally,
during a period of rising short-term interest rates, the Company’s net interest
spread earned on its investment portfolio will decrease. The decrease of
the net
interest spread results from (i) the lag in resets of the adjustable rate
loans
underlying the adjustable rate securities and securitized finance receivables
relative to the rate resets on the associated borrowings and (ii) rate resets
on
the adjustable rate loans which are generally limited to 1% every six months
or
2% every twelve months and subject to lifetime caps, while the associated
borrowings have no such limitation. As to item (i), the Company has
substantially limited its interest rate risk on such investments through
(a) the issuance of fixed-rate non-recourse securitization financing which
approximated $531.1 million as of September 30, 2005, and (b) equity, which
was $149.5 million at September 30, 2005. As to item (ii), as short-term
interest rates stabilize and the ARM loans reset, the net interest margin
may be
partially restored as the yields on the ARM loans adjust to market conditions.
The remaining portion of the Company’s investment portfolio as of September 30,
2005, approximately $646 million, is comprised of loans or securities that
have
coupon rates that are fixed.
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
(a) Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures.
Disclosure
controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed
to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed
or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls
and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
the
Company’s reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated
to management, including the Company’s management, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
As
of the
end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. This
evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation
of
the Company’s management, including the Company’s Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s
management concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
26
In
conducting its review of disclosure controls, management concluded that
sufficient disclosure controls and procedures did exist to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
(b) Changes
in internal controls.
The
Company’s management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes
in the
Company’s internal controls or in other factors during the quarter covered by
this report that could materially affect, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect the Company’s internal controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date, nor
any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in such internal controls
requiring corrective actions.
27
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
As
discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries are defendants
in
litigation. The following discussion is the current status of the
litigation.
GLS
Capital, Inc. (“GLS”), a subsidiary of the Company, and the County of Allegheny,
Pennsylvania (“Allegheny County”), are defendants in a lawsuit in the Court of
Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (the “Court”). Plaintiffs
allege that GLS illegally charged the taxpayers of Allegheny County certain
attorney fees, costs and expenses, and interest in the collection of delinquent
property tax receivables owned by GLS. Plaintiffs are seeking class action
status. During the third quarter 2005, the Court held hearings in this
matter, and has not yet ruled on whether it will grant class action status
in
the litigation. Plaintiffs have not enumerated its damages in this
matter. We believe that the ultimate outcome of this litigation will not
have a material impact on our financial condition, but may have a material
impact on reported results for the particular period presented.
The
Company and Dynex Commercial, Inc. (“DCI”), formerly an affiliate of the Company
and now known as DCI Commercial, Inc., are appellees (or “respondents”) in the
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Judicial District of Texas at Dallas, related
to
the matter of Basic Capital Management et al (collectively, “BCM” or “the
Plaintiffs”) versus Dynex Commercial, Inc. et al. During the third quarter
2005, Plaintiffs, the Company, and DCI filed various briefs in the matter
in
accordance with the Court of Appeals schedule, in anticipation of a hearing
on
the appeal sometime in 2006. Plaintiff’s appeal seeks to overturn a
judgment in favor of the Company and DCI which denied recovery to Plaintiffs,
and to have a judgment entered in favor of Plaintiffs based on a jury award
for
damages against the Company of $0.3 million, and against DCI for $2.2 million
or
$25.6 million, all of which was set aside by the trial court. In the
alternative, Plaintiffs are seeking a new trial.
On
February 11, 2005, a putative class action complaint alleging violations
of the
federal securities laws and various state common law claims was filed against
the Company, our subsidiary MERIT Securities Corporation, Stephen J. Benedetti,
the Company's Executive Vice President, and Thomas H. Potts, the Company's
former President and a former Director, in United States District Court for
the
Southern District of New York (“District Court”) by the Teamsters Local 445
Freight Division Pension Fund ("Teamsters"). The lawsuit purported to be a
class action on behalf of purchasers of MERIT Series 13 securitization financing
bonds, which are collateralized by manufactured housing loans. On May 31,
2005, the Teamsters filed an amended class action complaint. The amended
complaint dropped all state common law claims but added federal securities
claims related to the MERIT Series 12 securitization financing bonds. The
Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on July 15, 2005
to
which Teamsters filed a response with the District Court on August 15,
2005. The Company has evaluated the allegations and believes them to be
without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against them.
Although
no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of the above
litigation, the Company believes the resolution of these lawsuits will not
have
a material effect on our consolidated balance sheet but could materially
affect
our consolidated results of operations in a given year.
28
None
None
None
None
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
29
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
Date:
November 21, 2005
|
/s/
Stephen J. Benedetti
|
Stephen
J. Benedetti
|
|
Principal
Executive Officer
|
|
(authorized
officer of registrant, principal accounting
officer)
|
30
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
No.
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|