DYNEX CAPITAL INC - Annual Report: 2007 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
þ ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
or
o TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
Commission
file number 1-9819
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia
|
52-1549373
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
4551
Cox Road, Suite 300, Glen Allen, Virginia
|
23060-6740
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code (804) 217-5800
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
Title of each
class
|
Name of each exchange
on which registered
|
Common
Stock, $.01 par value
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
Series
D 9.50% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, $.01 par
value
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
|
None
(Title of
class)
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer þ Non-accelerated
filer o Smaller
reporting company o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No þ
As of
June 29, 2007, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $79,908,733 based on the
closing sales price on the New York Stock Exchange of $8.25.
Common
stock outstanding as of January 31, 2008 was 12,136,262 shares.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the Definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2008 annual meeting of
shareholders, expected to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days
from December 31, 2007, are incorporated by reference into Part
III.
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
2007
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Page
Number
|
|||
PART
I.
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Business
|
1
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
5
|
|
Item
1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
10
|
|
Item
2.
|
Properties
|
10
|
|
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
10
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
11
|
|
PART
II.
|
|||
Item
5.
|
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
12
|
|
Item
6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
14
|
|
Item
7.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation
|
14
|
|
Item
7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
38
|
|
Item
8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
39
|
|
Item
9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
39
|
|
Item
9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
39
|
|
Item
9B.
|
Other
Information
|
40
|
|
PART
III.
|
Item
10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
40
|
Item
11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
40
|
|
Item
12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
41
|
|
Item
13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
41
|
|
Item
14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
41
|
|
PART
IV.
|
Item
15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
42
|
SIGNATURES
|
44
|
||
PART I
In
this annual report on Form 10-K, we refer to Dynex Capital, Inc. and its
subsidiaries as “we,” “us,” “Dynex,” or “the Company,” unless specifically
indicated otherwise.
ITEM
1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
We are a
specialty finance company organized as a mortgage real estate investment trust
(REIT). We invest principally in single-family residential and
commercial mortgage loans and securities, both investment grade rated and
non-investment grade rated. Residential mortgage securities are
typically referred to as RMBS and commercial mortgage securities are typically
referred to as CMBS. We finance loans and RMBS and CMBS securities
through a combination of non-recourse securitization financing, repurchase
agreements, and equity. We employ financing in order to increase the
overall yield on our invested capital. Our primary source of income
is net interest income, which is the excess of the interest income earned on our
investments over the cost of financing these investments. We
typically intend to hold securities to their maturity but may occasionally
record gains or losses from the sale of investments prior to their
maturity.
Our
ownership of residential and commercial mortgage loans, RMBS and CMBS and use of
leverage exposes us to certain risks, including, but not limited to, credit
risk, interest rate risk, liquidity or margin call risk and prepayment risk,
which are discussed in more detail in ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS.
Over the
last several years, we have sold certain assets and otherwise allowed our
investment assets to run off. We retained most of our capital or
invested it in short-term instruments. We retained our capital in
anticipation of more compelling opportunities for reinvestment given low risk
premiums as reflected by spreads to U.S. Treasuries on RMBS and CMBS securities
at that time. Low risk premiums were a direct result of excessive
competition for these assets from other mortgage REITs, hedge funds,
collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and other similarly highly-leveraged
collateral backed vehicles, financial institutions, foreign investors, and other
money managers. Since the middle of 2007, risk premiums on RMBS
and CMBS assets have increased dramatically presenting opportunities for
investing in RMBS and CMBS securities with more acceptable risk-adjusted
returns.
In
February 2008, our Board of Directors authorized the investment of a significant
portion of our capital in RMBS securities issued or guaranteed by a federally
chartered corporation, such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, or an agency of the
U.S. government, such as Ginnie Mae (commonly referred to as Agency
RMBS). While we have occasionally invested in Agency RMBS in the
past, we believe that risk-adjusted returns for investing in Agency RMBS are
currently compelling given current yields available and the favorable terms and
costs to finance the Agency RMBS. We expect to use repurchase
agreement leverage in order to enhance the overall returns on our invested
capital. Our leverage ratio on these and other investments may vary
depending on market and economic conditions. We also expect to employ
derivatives in order to manage our interest rate risk.
As a
REIT, we are required to distribute to shareholders as dividends at least 90% of
our taxable income, which is our income as calculated for tax, after
consideration of any tax net operating loss (NOL)
carryforwards. However, unlike other mortgage REITs, our required
REIT income distributions may be limited into the future due to the reduction of
our future taxable income by our NOL carryforwards, which were approximately
$150 million at December 31, 2007, although we have not finalized our 2007
federal income tax return. As a result, we have the option of being
able to invest our capital and compound the returns on an essentially tax-free
basis instead of distributing our earnings to our shareholders. We
will balance the desire to retain our capital and compound our returns with
dividend distributions to shareholders. On February 5, 2008, the
Board declared a dividend of $0.10 per common share, our first dividend to
common shareholders since the third quarter of 1998.
We were
incorporated in the Commonwealth of Virginia in 1987 and began operations in
1988.
1
BUSINESS
MODEL AND STRATEGY
As a
mortgage REIT, we seek to generate net interest income from our investment
portfolio. We seek to invest our capital in a prudent manner,
focusing on investment assets which have an acceptable risk-adjusted rate of
return. Our current investment portfolio consists of highly-seasoned
loans and RMBS and CMBS. Net interest income on our investment portfolio is
directly impacted by the credit performance of the underlying loans and
securities and, to a lesser extent, by the level of prepayments of the
underlying loans and securities and changes in interest rates. With
the planned investment in Agency RMBS in 2008, our exposure to prepayment and
interest rate risk will increase. We intend to invest in assets and
structure the financing of these assets in such a way that will generate
reasonably stable net interest income in a variety of prepayment, interest rate
and credit environments. Our business model and strategy have
inherent risks, which are discussed in ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS
below.
Our
investment policy governs the allocation of capital among various investment
alternatives. Our capital
allocations are reviewed annually by the Board of Directors and are adjusted for
a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the current investment
climate, the current interest rate environment, competition, liquidity concerns
and our desire for capital preservation. Our capital allocations are
currently weighted toward our existing investments of highly-seasoned
single-family and commercial mortgage loans, RMBS and CMBS. Our
capital allocations will shift in 2008 as we deploy our capital in Agency
RMBS.
We own
both investment grade (credit rating of “BBB-” or higher) and non-investment
grade investments. Our investment grade assets are rated by at least
one nationally recognized rating agency, such as Moody’s Investors Services,
Inc., Standard & Poor’s Corporation or Fitch,
Inc. Investment assets that are not rated or are below
investment grade are generally highly seasoned. A summary of our
investments by credit rating is presented in tabular form in Item 7
below. As it relates to our current investment portfolio, our
ownership of non-investment grade securities is generally in the form of the
first-loss or subordinate classes of securitization trusts. In
securitization trusts, loans and securities are pledged to a trust, and the
trust issues bonds (referred to as non-recourse securitization financing)
pursuant to an indenture. We have typically been the sponsor of the
trust and have retained the lowest-rated bond classes in the trust, often
referred to as subordinate bonds or overcollateralization. While all
of the loans collateralizing the trust are consolidated in our financial
statements, the performance of our investment depends on the performance of the
subordinate bonds and overcollateralization we retained. The overall
performance of our retained interests in these trusts is principally dependent
on the credit performance of the underlying assets. Most of the
investments which we own were originated by us and are considered highly
seasoned. The single-family mortgage loans that we have in our
investment portfolio were originated between 1992 and 1997. The
commercial mortgage loans that we have in our investment portfolio were
originated in 1997 and 1998. Most of the RMBS and CMBS in our
investment portfolio are collateralized by loans originated during the same
timeframes.
We currently have $7.5 million of fixed
rate Agency RMBS. We anticipate that our investments in Agency RMBS
going forward will predominantly be in securities collateralized by hybrid
mortgage loans, which have interest rates that are fixed for a specified period
(typically three to seven years) and generally adjust annually, thereafter, to
an increment over a specified interest rate index, and, to a lesser extent,
Agency RMBS collateralized by adjustable rate mortgage loans, which have
interest rates that generally adjust annually (although some may adjust more
frequently) to an increment over a specified interest rate index, and fixed rate
mortgage loans. Agency RMBS collateralized by hybrid mortgage loans
and adjustable rate mortgage loans are typically referred to as Hybrid or ARM
Agency RMBS, respectively. Interest rates on the adjustable rate
loans collateralizing the Hybrid or ARM Agency RMBS are based on specific index
rates, such as the one-year constant maturity treasury (CMT) rate, the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), the Federal Reserve U.S. 12-month cumulative
average one-year CMT (MTA) or the 11th District Cost of Funds Index (COFI). In
addition, the loans collateralizing Agency RMBS typically have interim and
lifetime caps on interest rate adjustments. Hybrid and ARM
Agency RMBS typically are less sensitive to changes in interest rates than
fixed-rate Agency RMBS.
We
intend to finance our acquisition of Agency RMBS by borrowing against a
substantial portion of the market value of these assets utilizing repurchase
agreements. Repurchase agreements are financings under which we will
pledge our Agency RMBS as collateral to secure loans with repurchase agreement
counterparties. The amount borrowed under a repurchase agreement is limited to a
specified percentage of the estimated market value of the pledged collateral.
Under repurchase agreements, a lender may require that we pledge additional
assets (i.e., by initiating a margin call) in the event the estimated fair value
of our existing pledged collateral declines below a specified percentage during
the term of the borrowing. Our pledged collateral fluctuates in value due to,
among other things, principal repayments and changes in market interest
rates. Generally the cost of repurchase agreement borrowings are
based on a spread to LIBOR. As interest rates on
Agency
2
RMBS
assets will not reset as frequently as the interest rates on repurchase
agreement borrowings, we anticipate extending the interest rate reset dates of
our repurchase agreement borrowings by negotiating terms with the counterparty
and using derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swap
agreements. An interest rate swap agreement will allow us to fix the
borrowing cost on a portion of our repurchase agreement financing. We
may also use interest rate cap agreements. An interest rate cap
agreement is a contract whereby we, as the purchaser, pay a fee in exchange for
the right to receive payments equal to the principal (i.e., notional amount)
times the difference between a specified interest rate and a future interest
rate during a defined “active” period of time.
In
the future, we may also use sources of funding, in addition to repurchase
agreements, to finance our Agency RMBS portfolio, including but not limited to,
other types of collateralized borrowings, loan agreements, lines of credit,
commercial paper or the issuance of debt securities.
COMPETITION
The
specialty finance industry in which we compete is a highly competitive
industry. In making investments and financing those investments, we
compete with other mortgage REITs, specialty finance companies, investment
banking firms, savings and loan associations, commercial banks, mortgage
bankers, insurance companies, federal agencies, foreign investors and other
entities, many of which have greater financial resources and a lower cost of
capital than we do. Increased competition in the market and our
competitors’ greater financial resources have driven down returns on investments
and may adversely impact our ability to invest our capital on an acceptable
risk-adjusted basis.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
Our
website can be found at www.dynexcapital.com. Our
annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current
reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act) are made available, as soon as reasonably practicable
after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC), free of charge through our website.
We have
adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (Code of Conduct) that applies to
all of our employees, officers and directors. Our Code of Conduct is
also available, free of charge, on our website, along with our Audit Committee
Charter, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and our
Compensation Committee Charter. We will post on our website
amendments to the Code of Conduct or waivers from its provisions, if any, which
are applicable to any of our directors or executive officers in accordance with
SEC or NYSE requirements.
FEDERAL
INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
We
believe that we have complied with the requirements for qualification as a REIT
under the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). The REIT rules generally
require that a REIT invest primarily in real estate-related assets, that our
activities be passive rather than active and that we distribute annually to our
shareholders substantially all of our taxable income, after certain deductions,
including deductions for NOL carryforwards. We could be subject to
income tax if we failed to satisfy those requirements or if we acquired certain
types of income-producing real property. We use the calendar year for
both tax and financial reporting purposes. There may be differences
between taxable income and income computed in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP). These
differences primarily arise from timing differences in the recognition of
revenue and expense for tax and GAAP purposes. We currently have NOL
carryforwards of approximately $150 million, which expire between 2019 and
2025. We also had excess inclusion income of an estimated $0.8
million from our ownership of certain residual investments during
2007. Excess inclusion income cannot be offset by NOL carryforwards,
so in order to meet REIT distribution requirements, we must distribute all of
our excess inclusion income.
3
Failure
to satisfy certain Code requirements could cause us to lose our status as a
REIT. If we failed to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we may
be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum
tax) at regular corporate rates and would not receive deductions for dividends
paid to shareholders. We could, however, utilize our NOL
carryforwards to offset any taxable income. In addition, given the
size of our NOL carryforwards, we could pursue a business plan in the future in
which we would voluntarily forego our REIT status. If we lost or
otherwise surrendered our status as a REIT, we could not elect REIT status again
for five years. Several of our investments in securitized mortgage
loans have ownership restrictions limiting their ownership to
REITs. Therefore, if we chose to forego our REIT status, we would
have to sell these investments or otherwise provide for REIT ownership of these
investments.
We also
have a taxable REIT subsidiary (TRS), which has a NOL carryforward of
approximately $4 million. The TRS has limited operations, and,
accordingly, we have established a full valuation allowance for the related
deferred tax asset.
Qualification as a
REIT
Qualification
as a REIT requires that we satisfy a variety of tests relating to our income,
assets, distributions and ownership. The significant tests are
summarized below.
Sources of
Income. To continue qualifying as a REIT, we must satisfy two
distinct tests with respect to the sources of our income: the “75% income test”
and the “95% income test.” The 75% income test requires that we
derive at least 75% of our gross income (excluding gross income from prohibited
transactions) from certain real estate-related sources. In order to
satisfy the 95% income test, 95% of our gross income for the taxable year must
consist of either income that qualifies under the 75% income test or certain
other types of passive income.
If we
fail to meet either the 75% income test or the 95% income test, or both, in a
taxable year, we might nonetheless continue to qualify as a REIT, if our failure
was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect and the nature and amounts
of our items of gross income were properly disclosed to the Internal Revenue
Service. However, in such a case we would be required to pay a tax
equal to 100% of any excess non-qualifying income.
Nature and Diversification of
Assets. At the end of each calendar quarter, we must meet
three asset tests. Under the “75% asset test”, at least 75% of the
value of our total assets must represent cash or cash items (including
receivables), government securities or real estate assets. Under the
“10% asset test,” we may not own more than 10% of the outstanding voting
securities of any single non-governmental issuer, provided such securities do
not qualify under the 75% asset test or relate to taxable REIT
subsidiaries. Under the “5% asset test,” ownership of any stocks or
securities that do not qualify under the 75% asset test must be limited, in
respect of any single non-governmental issuer, to an amount not greater than 5%
of the value of our total assets.
If we
inadvertently fail to satisfy one or more of the asset tests at the end of a
calendar quarter, such failure would not cause us to lose our REIT status,
provided that (i) we satisfied all of the asset tests at the close of the
preceding calendar quarter and (ii) the discrepancy between the values of
our assets and the standards imposed by the asset tests either did not exist
immediately after the acquisition of any particular asset or was not wholly or
partially caused by such an acquisition. If the condition described
in clause (ii) of the preceding sentence was not satisfied, we still could
avoid disqualification by eliminating any discrepancy within 30 days after the
close of the calendar quarter in which it arose.
Ownership. In
order to maintain our REIT status, we must not be deemed to be closely held and
must have more than 100 shareholders. The closely held prohibition
requires that not more than 50% of the value of our outstanding shares be owned
by five or fewer persons at anytime during the last half of our taxable
year. The more than 100 shareholders rule requires that we have at
least 100 shareholders for 335 days of a twelve-month taxable
year. In the event that we failed to satisfy the ownership
requirements we would be subject to fines and be required to take curative
action to meet the ownership requirements in order to maintain our REIT
status.
4
EMPLOYEES
As of
December 31, 2007, we had 11 employees, all of whom were located in our
corporate offices in Glen Allen, Virginia. Our Chief Executive
Officer, who serves as our Chairman and was appointed CEO on February 5, 2008,
works from an office located in Sausalito, California. We believe our
relationship with our employees is good. None of our employees are
covered by any collective bargaining agreements, and we are not aware of any
union organizing activity relating to our employees. Effective
February 28, 2007, GLS Capital Services, Inc., our tax lien servicing subsidiary
headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, ceased operations, and its five
employees were terminated.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
Our
business is subject to various risks, including the risks described
below. Our business, operating results and financial condition could
be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. Please
note that additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem
immaterial may also impair our business and operations.
We
may be unable to invest in new assets with attractive yields, and yields on new
assets in which we do invest may not generate attractive yields, resulting in
a smaller than anticipated increase or an outright decline in our earnings
per share over time.
For the
last several years, we have not actively been reinvesting our capital, and our
existing investments have been declining as we have sold investments or assets
have otherwise paid down. We have been investing a portion of our
available capital in short duration high credit quality assets. We
anticipate deploying our capital in 2008 and that the capital deployed will earn
greater returns than it is currently earning. However, we may be
unable to find assets with attractive yields, and our net interest income may
decline, resulting in lower earnings per share over time. In order to
maintain our investment portfolio size and our earnings, we need to reinvest a
portion of the cash flows we receive into new interest-earning
assets. In addition, we may experience competition for assets in
which we desire to invest from other entities which may have greater resources
and a lower cost of capital than we do, and as a result, we may be unable to
find or afford suitable investment opportunities.
New
investments may entail risks that we do not currently have in our investment
portfolio or may substantially add risks to the investment portfolio which we
may or may not have managed in the past as part of our investment
strategy. In addition, while we have owned Agency RMBS in the past,
we have never had a significant amount of our capital invested in these
assets.
We
contemplate purchasing investment securities such as Agency RMBS which carry
concentrated risks including prepayment risk, interest rate risk, operational
risk, credit risk and liquidity or margin-call risk. While our
investment portfolio generally already includes these risks to some degree, we
may become more concentrated in one type of risk than another as we add
investments. While we will attempt to manage these risks, we may
inadvertently become overly concentrated in a particular risk which may increase
the volatility in our net income or reported book value if these investments are
carried at fair value.
In
addition, our investing in Agency RMBS and the use of repurchase agreement
financing will likely magnify the risks indicated above in the following
ways:
|
·
|
Prepayment
risk may increase as we will likely be purchasing these securities at
prices exceeding their par value. In such instance our earnings
and book value may be negatively impacted if prepayments on these
securities exceed our expectations.
|
|
·
|
Interest
rate risk will increase as result of, among other things, the purchase of
Hybrid Agency RMBS, which have interest rates that are fixed for an
initial period and will be financed principally with repurchase agreements
that are not expected to have fixed rates of interest. In
addition, Hybrid Agency RMBS typically have contractually limited periodic
or lifetime caps on their interest rates whereas repurchase agreement
financing will not.
|
5
|
·
|
Operational
risk will increase as we begin to deploy our capital and as we become more
concentrated in Agency RMBS.
|
|
·
|
Liquidity,
or margin-call risk, will increase as a result of our reliance on
financing for the purchase of Agency RMBS. In periods of high
volatility in the marketplace, such as was experienced in 2007, our access
to financing may be substantially reduced, potentially requiring us to
sell assets in unfavorable markets to repay financings and impacting our
ability to add investments at a positive net interest
spread. In addition, if the value of the collateral should fall
below the required level, the repurchase agreement lender could initiate a
margin call, which would require that we either pledge additional
collateral acceptable to the lender or repay a portion of the debt in
order to meet the margin requirement. If we are unable to meet
a margin call, we could be forced to quickly sell the assets
collateralizing the financing, potentially resulting in a lower sales
price than could otherwise be obtained if the assets were sold in a more
orderly fashion.
|
Competition
may prevent us from acquiring new investments at favorable yields potentially
negatively impacting our profitability.
Our net
income will largely depend on our ability to acquire mortgage-related assets at
favorable spreads over our borrowing costs. In acquiring investments,
we may compete with other mortgage REITs, broker-dealers, hedge funds, banks,
savings and loans, insurance companies, mutual funds, and other entities that
purchase assets similar to ours, many of which have greater financial resources
than we do. As a result, we may not be able to acquire sufficient
assets at acceptable spreads to our borrowing costs, which would adversely
affect our profitability.
Our
ownership of certain subordinate interests in securitization trusts subjects us
to credit risk on the underlying loans, and we provide for loss reserves on
these loans as required under GAAP.
As a
result of our ownership of securitized mortgage loans and the
overcollateralization portion of the securitization trust, the predominant risk
in our investment portfolio is credit risk. Credit risk is the risk
of loss to us from the failure by a borrower (or the proceeds from the
liquidation of the underlying collateral) to fully repay the principal balance
and interest due on a mortgage loan. A borrower’s ability to repay
and the value of the underlying collateral could be negatively influenced by
economic and market conditions. These conditions could be global,
national, regional or local in nature. Upon securitization of a pool
of mortgage loans, the credit risk retained by us from an economic point of view
is generally limited to the overcollateralization tranche of the securitization
trust. We provide for estimated losses on the gross amount of loans
pledged to securitization trusts included in our financial statements as
required by GAAP. In some instances, we may also retain subordinated
bonds from the securitization trust, which increases our credit risk above the
overcollateralization tranche from an economic perspective. We
provide reserves for existing losses based on the current performance of the
respective pool or on an individual loan basis. If losses are
experienced more rapidly, due to declining property performance, market
conditions or other factors, than we have provided for in our reserves, we may
be required to provide additional reserves for these losses.
Our
efforts to manage credit risk may not be successful in limiting delinquencies
and defaults in underlying loans or losses on our investments.
Despite
our efforts to manage credit risk, there are many aspects of credit performance
that we cannot control. Third party servicers provide for the primary
and special servicing of our loans. We have a risk management
function, which oversees the performance of these services and provides limited
asset management services. Our risk management operations may not be
successful in limiting future delinquencies, defaults, and
losses. The securitizations in which we have invested may not receive
funds that we believe are due from mortgage insurance companies and other
counter-parties. Loan servicing companies may not cooperate with our
risk management efforts, or such efforts may be ineffective. Service
providers to securitizations, such as trustees, bond insurance providers, and
custodians, may not perform in a manner that promotes our
interests. The value of the properties collateralizing the loans may
decline. The frequency of default and the loss severity on loans that
do default may be greater than we anticipated. If loans become “real
estate owned” (REO), servicing companies will have to manage these properties
and may not be able to sell them. Changes in consumer behavior,
bankruptcy laws, tax laws, and other laws may exacerbate loan
losses. In some states and circumstances, the securitizations in
which we invest have recourse, as the owner of the loan, against the borrower’s
other assets and income in the event of loan default; however, in most cases,
the value of the underlying property will be the sole source of funds for any
recoveries.
6
Certain
investments employ internal structural leverage as a result of the
securitization process and are in the most subordinate position in the capital
structure, which magnifies the potential impact of adverse events on our cash
flows and reported results.
Many of
the loans that we own have been pledged to securitization trusts, which employ a
high degree of internal structural leverage and results in concentrated credit,
interest rate, prepayment, or other risks. We have generally retained
the most subordinate classes of the securitization trust as discussed
above. As a result of these factors, net interest income and cash
flows on our investments will vary based on the performance of the assets
pledged to the securitization trust. In particular, should assets
significantly underperform as to delinquencies, defaults, and credit losses, it
is possible that cash flows which may have otherwise been paid to us as a result
of our ownership of the subordinate interests may be retained within the
securitization trust and payments of principal amounts of the subordinated class
may be delayed or permanently reduced. No amount of risk management
or mitigation can change the variable nature of the cash flows and financial
results generated by concentrated risks in our investments. None of
our existing trusts at December 31, 2007 have reached or are near these levels,
but such levels could be reached in the future.
We
may be subject to the risks associated with inadequate or untimely services from
third-party service providers, which may harm our results of
operations.
Our loans
and loans underlying securities are serviced by third-party service
providers. As with any external service provider, we are subject to
the risks associated with inadequate or untimely services. Many
borrowers require notices and reminders to keep their loans current and to
prevent delinquencies and foreclosures. A substantial increase in our
delinquency rate that results from improper servicing or loan performance in
general could harm our ability to securitize our real estate loans in the future
and may have an adverse effect on our earnings.
Prepayments
of principal on our investments, and the timing of prepayments, may impact our
reported earnings and our cash flows.
We own
many of our securitized mortgage loans and have issued associated securitization
financing bonds at premiums or discounts to their principal
balances. Prepayments of principal on loans and the associated bonds,
whether voluntary or involuntary, impact the amortization of premiums and
discounts under the effective yield method of accounting that we use for GAAP
accounting. Under the effective yield method of accounting, we
recognize yields on our assets and effective costs of our liabilities based on
assumptions regarding future cash flows. Variations in actual cash
flows from those assumed as a result of prepayments and subsequent changes in
future cash flow expectations will cause adjustments in yields on assets and
costs of liabilities which could contribute to volatility in our future
results.
In a
period of declining interest rates, loans and securities in the investment
portfolio will generally prepay more rapidly (to the extent that such loans are
not prohibited from prepayment), which may result in additional amortization of
asset premium. In a flat yield curve environment (i.e., when there
exists less spread between short-dated Treasury securities and longer dated
ones), adjustable rate mortgage loans and securities tend to rapidly prepay,
causing additional amortization of asset premium. In addition, the
spread between our funding costs and asset yields may compress, causing a
further reduction in our net interest income.
We
may finance a portion of our investment portfolio with short-term recourse
repurchase agreements which may subject us to margin calls if the
assets pledged subsequently decline in value.
We
finance a portion of our investments, primarily high credit quality, liquid
securities, with recourse repurchase agreements. These arrangements
require us to maintain a certain level of collateral for the related
borrowings. If the collateral should fall below the required level,
the repurchase agreement lender could initiate a margin call. This
would require that we either pledge additional collateral acceptable to the
lender or repay a portion of the debt in order to meet the margin
requirement. Should we be unable to meet a margin call, we may have
to liquidate the collateral or other assets quickly. Because a margin
call and quick sale could result in a lower than otherwise expected and
attainable sale price, we may incur a loss on the sale of the
collateral. While we currently only finance a small portion of our
investments with repurchase agreements, we anticipate having much greater
amounts of repurchase agreements as we purchase new
investments.
7
Interest
rate fluctuations can have various negative effects on us and could lead to
reduced earnings and/or increased earnings volatility.
Our
investment portfolio today is substantially match-funded (meaning fixed rate
assets are financed with fixed rate liabilities), and overall our current
portfolio is largely insulated from material risks related to changes in
interest rates. Future investments, however, may be financed with
repurchase agreements which may have different interest rate characteristics or
maturities than the investments which they finance. Certain of our
current investments and contemplated future investments are adjustable rate
loans and securities, which have interest rates that reset semi-annually or
annually, based on an index such as the one-year constant maturity treasury or
the six-month LIBOR. These investments may be financed with
borrowings which reset monthly, based on one-month LIBOR. In a rising
rate environment, net interest income earned on these investments may be
reduced, as the interest cost for the funding sources could increase more
rapidly than the interest earned on the associated asset financed. In
a declining interest rate environment, net interest income may be enhanced as
the interest cost for the funding sources decreases more rapidly than the
interest earned on the associated assets. To the extent that assets
and liabilities are both fixed rate or adjustable rate with corresponding
payment dates, interest rate risk may be mitigated.
Hedging
against interest rate exposure may adversely affect our earnings.
Subject
to complying with REIT requirements, we intend to employ techniques that limit,
or “hedge,” the adverse effects of changing interest rates on our short-term
repurchase agreements and on the value of our assets. Our hedging
activity will vary in scope based on the level and volatility of interest rates
and principal repayments, the type of securities held and other changing market
conditions. These techniques may include entering into interest rate
swap agreements or interest rate cap or floor agreements, purchasing or selling
futures contracts, purchasing put and call options on securities or securities
underlying futures contracts, or entering into forward rate
agreements. However, there are no perfect hedging strategies, and
interest rate hedging may fail to protect us from loss. In addition,
these hedging strategies may adversely affect us, because hedging activities
involve an expense that we will incur regardless of the effectiveness of the
hedging activity. Hedging activities could result in losses if the
event against which we hedge does not occur. Additionally, interest
rate hedging could fail to protect us or adversely affect us, because among
other things:
|
•
|
available
interest rate hedging may not correspond directly with the interest rate
risk for which protection is
sought;
|
|
•
|
the
duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the related
liability;
|
|
•
|
the
party owing money in the hedging transaction may default on its obligation
to pay;
|
|
•
|
the
credit quality of the party owing money on the hedge may be downgraded to
such an extent that it impairs our ability to sell or assign our side of
the hedging transaction; and
|
|
•
|
the
value of derivatives used for hedging may be adjusted from time to time in
accordance with accounting rules to reflect changes in fair
value. Downward adjustments, or “mark-to-market losses,” would
reduce our shareholders’ equity.
|
Our
reported income depends on accounting conventions and assumptions about the
future that may change.
Accounting
rules for our assets and for the various aspects of our current and future
business change from time to time. Changes in GAAP, or the accepted
interpretation of these accounting principles, can affect our reported income
and shareholders’ equity. Interest income on our assets and interest
expense on our liabilities may in part be based on estimates of future
events. These estimates can change in a manner that negatively
impacts our results or can demonstrate, in retrospect, that revenue recognition
in prior periods was too high or too low. We use the effective yield
method of GAAP accounting for many of our investments. We calculate
projected cash flows for each of these assets incorporating assumptions about
the amount and timing of credit losses, loan prepayment rates, and other
factors. The yield we recognize for GAAP purposes generally equals
the discount rate that produces a net present value for actual and projected
cash flows that equals our GAAP basis in that asset. We change the
yield recognized on these assets based on actual performance and as we change
our estimates of future cash flows. The assumptions that underlie our
projected cash flows and effective yield analysis may prove to be overly
optimistic, or conversely, overly conservative. In these cases, our
GAAP yield on the asset, or cost of the liability may change, leading to changes
in our reported GAAP results.
8
Failure
to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect our dividend distributions and could
adversely affect the value of our securities.
We
believe that we have met all requirements for qualification as a REIT for
federal income tax purposes, and we intend to continue to operate to remain
qualified as a REIT in the future. However, many of the requirements
for qualification as a REIT are highly technical and complex and require an
analysis of factual matters and an application of the legal requirements to such
factual matters in situations where there is only limited judicial and
administrative guidance. Thus, no assurance can be given that the
Internal Revenue Service or a court would agree with our conclusion that we have
qualified as a REIT or that future changes in our factual situation or the law
will allow us to remain qualified as a REIT. If we failed to qualify
as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and did not meet the requirements for
statutory relief, we could be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate
rates on our income if we could not otherwise offset taxable income with our NOL
carryforward, and we could possibly be disqualified as a REIT for four years
thereafter. Failure to qualify as a REIT could force us to sell
certain of our investments, possibly at a loss, and could adversely affect the
value of our common stock.
Maintaining
REIT status may reduce our flexibility to manage our operations.
To
maintain REIT status, we must follow certain rules and meet certain
tests. In doing so, our flexibility to manage our operations may be
reduced. For instance:
·If we make
frequent asset sales from our REIT entities to persons deemed customers,
we could be viewed as a “dealer,” and thus subject to 100% prohibited
transaction taxes or other entity level taxes on income from such
transactions.
|
|
·Compliance
with the REIT income and asset rules may limit the type or extent of
hedging that we can undertake.
|
|
·Our ability to
own non-real estate related assets and earn non-real estate related income
is limited. Our ability to own equity interests in other
entities is limited. If we fail to comply with these limits, we
may be forced to liquidate attractive assets on short notice on
unfavorable terms in order to maintain our REIT status.
|
|
·Our ability to
invest in taxable subsidiaries is limited under the REIT
rules. Maintaining compliance with this limitation could
require us to constrain the growth of our taxable REIT affiliates in the
future.
|
|
·Meeting
minimum REIT dividend distribution requirements could reduce our
liquidity. Earning non-cash REIT taxable income could
necessitate our selling assets, incurring debt, or raising new equity in
order to fund dividend distributions.
|
|
·Stock
ownership tests may limit our ability to raise significant amounts of
equity capital from one source.
|
If
we fail to properly conduct our operations we could become subject to regulation
under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
We seek
to conduct our operations so as to avoid falling under the definition of an
investment company pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940
Act). Specifically, we currently seek to conduct our operations under the
exemption afforded under the 1940 Act pursuant to Section 3(c)(5)(C), a
provision available to companies primarily engaged in the business of purchasing
and otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real
estate. According to SEC no-action letters, companies relying on this
exemption must ensure that at least 55% of their assets are mortgage loans and
other qualifying assets, and at least 80% of their assets are real
estate-related. We recently learned that the staff of the SEC
has provided informal guidance to other companies that these asset
tests should be measured on an unconsolidated basis.
Accordingly, we will make any adjustments necessary to ensure we continue
to qualify for, and each of our subsidiaries also continues to qualify for an
exemption from registration under the 1940 Act. We and our
subsidiaries will rely either on Section 3(c)(5)(C) or other sections that
provide exemptions from registering under the 1940 Act, including Sections
3(a)(1)(C) and 3(c)(7).
9
If the
SEC were to determine that we were an investment company with no currently
available exemption or exclusion from registration and that we were, therefore,
required to register as an investment company our ability to use leverage would
be substantially reduced, and our ability to conduct business as we do
today would be impaired.
We
are dependent on certain key personnel.
We have
only two executive officers, Thomas B. Akin, our Chief Executive Officer, and
Stephen J. Benedetti, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer. Mr. Akin has been a director of the Company since 2003 and
was appointed Chief Executive Officer in February 2008. Mr. Akin has
extensive knowledge of the mortgage industry and the Company. Mr.
Benedetti has been with us since 1994 and has extensive knowledge of the
Company, our operations, and our investment portfolio. He also has
extensive experience in managing a portfolio of mortgage-related investments and
as an executive officer of a publicly-traded mortgage REIT. The loss
of either Mr. Akin or Mr. Benedetti could have an adverse effect on our
operations or an adverse effect on any of our counterparties.
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no unresolved comments from
the SEC Staff.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
We lease
our executive and administrative offices located in Glen Allen,
Virginia. The address is 4551 Cox Road, Suite 300, Glen Allen,
Virginia 23060. As of December 31, 2007, we leased 8,244 square
feet. The term of the lease runs to May 2008 but may be renewed at
our option for three additional one-year periods at substantially similar
terms.
We
believe that our property is maintained in good operating condition and is
suitable and adequate for our purposes.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We and
our subsidiaries may be involved in certain litigation matters arising in the
ordinary course of business. Although the ultimate outcome of these
matters cannot be ascertained at this time, and the results of legal proceedings
cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe, based on current knowledge, that
the resolution of any such matters will not have a material adverse effect on
our financial position or results of operations. Information on
litigation arising out of the ordinary course of business is described
below.
One of
our subsidiaries, GLS Capital, Inc. (GLS), and the County of Allegheny,
Pennsylvania (Allegheny County), are defendants in a class action lawsuit filed
in 1997 in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (the
Court of Common Pleas). Plaintiffs allege that GLS illegally charged the
taxpayers of Allegheny County certain attorney fees, costs and expenses and
interest, in the collection of delinquent property tax receivables owned by GLS
which were purchased from Allegheny County. In 2007, the
Court of Common Pleas stayed this action pending the outcome of other litigation
before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in which GLS is not directly involved but
has filed an amicus brief in support of the defendants. Several of the
allegations in that lawsuit are similar to those being made against GLS in this
litigation. Plaintiffs have not enumerated their damages in this
matter, and we believe that the ultimate outcome of this litigation will not
have a material impact on our financial condition, but may have a material
impact on our reported results for the particular period presented.
Dynex
Capital, Inc. and Dynex Commercial, Inc. (DCI), formerly our affiliate and now
known as DCI Commercial, Inc., are appellees in the Court of Appeals for the
Fifth Judicial District of Texas at Dallas (Fifth District), related to the
matter of Basic Capital Management, et al. (collectively, BCM or the
Plaintiffs), versus Dynex Commercial, Inc. et al. The Fifth District heard
oral arguments in this matter in April 2006. The appeal sought to overturn
the trial court’s judgment in our and DCI’s favor which denied recovery to
Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs sought a reversal of the trial court’s
judgment, and sought rendition of judgment against us for alleged breach of loan
agreements for tenant improvements in the amount of $0.25 million. They
also sought reversal of the trial court’s judgment and rendition of judgment
against DCI in favor of BCM under two mutually exclusive damage models, for $2.2
million and $25.6 million, respectively, related to the alleged
breach
10
by DCI of
a $160 million “master” loan commitment. Plaintiffs also sought
reversal and rendition of a judgment in their favor for attorneys’ fees in the
amount of $2.1 million. Alternatively, Plaintiffs sought a new
trial. On February 22, 2008, the Fifth District ruled in our and
DCI’s favor, upholding the trial court’s judgment. It is possible the
Plaintiffs may seek to further appeal the ruling of the Fifth
District. Even if Plaintiffs were to be successful on appeal, DCI is
a former affiliate of ours, and we believe that we would have no obligation for
amounts, if any, awarded to the Plaintiffs as a result of the actions of
DCI.
Dynex Capital, Inc. and MERIT Securities Corporation, a subsidiary, are defendants in a putative class action complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (District Court) by the Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund (Teamsters). The complaint was filed on February 7, 2005, and purports to be a class action on behalf of purchasers between February 2000 and May 2004 of MERIT Series 12 and MERIT Series 13 securitization financing bonds (the Bonds), which are collateralized by manufactured housing loans. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and alleges, among other things, misrepresentations in connection with the issuance of and subsequent reporting on the Bonds. The complaint initially named our former president and our current Chief Operating Officer as defendants. On February 10, 2006, the District Court dismissed the claims against our former president and our current Chief Operating Officer, but did not dismiss the claims against us or MERIT. We and MERIT petitioned for an interlocutory appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Second Circuit). The Second Circuit granted our petition on September 15, 2006 and heard oral argument on our appeal on January 30, 2008. We have evaluated the allegations made in the complaint and believe them to be without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves against them.
Although
no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of the above
litigation, the Company believes the resolution of these lawsuits will not have
a material effect on our consolidated balance sheet but could materially affect
our consolidated results of operations in a given year or period.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No
matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the fourth quarter
of 2007.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE
REGISTRANT
Name
(Age)
|
Current
Title
|
Offices
Held
|
Thomas
B. Akin (56)
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
Chief
Executive Officer since February 2008; Chairman of the Board since
2003.
|
Stephen
J. Benedetti (45)
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since November 2005; Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from September 2001 to November
2005.
|
11
PART II
ITEM
5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Our
common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol
“DX”. The common stock was held by approximately 5,452 holders of
record and beneficial holders who hold common stock in street name as of January
31, 2008. On that date, the closing price of our common stock on the
New York Stock Exchange was $8.59 per share. During the last two
years, the high and low stock prices and cash dividends declared on common stock
were as follows:
High
|
Low
|
Dividends
Declared
|
||||||||||
2007:
|
||||||||||||
First
quarter
|
$ | 7.99 | $ | 7.00 | $ | – | ||||||
Second
quarter
|
$ | 8.50 | $ | 7.75 | $ | – | ||||||
Third
quarter
|
$ | 8.35 | $ | 7.62 | $ | – | ||||||
Fourth
quarter
|
$ | 8.92 | $ | 7.74 | $ | – | ||||||
2006:
|
||||||||||||
First
quarter
|
$ | 6.98 | $ | 6.44 | $ | – | ||||||
Second
quarter
|
$ | 6.99 | $ | 6.35 | $ | – | ||||||
Third
quarter
|
$ | 7.49 | $ | 6.60 | $ | – | ||||||
Fourth
quarter
|
$ | 7.20 | $ | 6.70 | $ | – |
Any
dividends declared by the Board of Directors have generally been for the purpose
of maintaining our REIT status, and in compliance with requirements set forth at
the time of the issuance of the Series D Preferred Stock. The stated
quarterly dividend on Series D Preferred Stock is $0.2375 per
share. In accordance with the terms of the Series D Preferred Shares,
if we fail to pay two consecutive quarterly preferred dividends or if we fail to
maintain consolidated shareholders’ equity of at least 200% of the aggregate
issue price of the Series D Preferred Stock, then these shares automatically
convert into a new series of 9.50% senior unsecured notes. Dividends
for the preferred stock must be fully paid before dividends can be paid on
common stock.
12
STOCK
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The
following graph demonstrates a five year comparison of cumulative total returns
for the shares of our common stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index
(S&P 500), and the Bloomberg Mortgage REIT Index. The table below
assumes $100 was invested at the close of trading on December 31, 2002 in
the shares of our common stock, S&P 500, and the Bloomberg Mortgage REIT
Index.
Comparative
Five-Year Total Returns (1)
Dynex
Capital, Inc., S&P 500, and Bloomberg Mortgage REIT Index
(Performance
Results through December 31, 2007)
Cumulative
Total Stockholder Returns as of December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Index
|
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dynex
Capital, Inc.
|
$ | 100.00 | $ | 126.03 | $ | 161.57 | $ | 142.57 | $ | 146.49 | $ | 183.27 | ||||||||||||
S&P
500 (1)
|
$ | 100.00 | $ | 128.36 | $ | 142.15 | $ | 149.01 | $ | 172.27 | $ | 181.71 | ||||||||||||
Bloomberg
Mortgage REIT Index (1)
|
$ | 100.00 | $ | 131.92 | $ | 167.18 | $ | 140.47 | $ | 167.60 | $ | 92.92 |
(1)
|
Cumulative
total return assumes reinvestment of dividends. The source of
this information is Bloomberg and Standard & Poor’s. The
factual material is obtained from sources believed to be
reliable.
|
13
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The
following table presents selected financial information and should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements.
Years
ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands except share and per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 10,683 | $ | 11,087 | $ | 11,889 | $ | 23,281 | $ | 38,971 | ||||||||||
Net
interest income after recapture of (provision for) loan
losses
|
11,964 | 11,102 | 6,109 | 4,818 | 1,889 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment
charges
|
– | (60 | ) | (2,474 | ) | (14,756 | ) | (16,355 | ) | |||||||||||
Equity
in income (loss) of joint venture
|
709 | (852 | ) | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||
Loss
on capitalization of joint venture
|
– | (1,194 | ) | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||
Gain
(loss) on sale of investments
|
755 | (183 | ) | 9,609 | 14,490 | 1,555 | ||||||||||||||
Other
(expense) income
|
(533 | ) | 617 | 2,022 | (179 | ) | 436 | |||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(3,996 | ) | (4,521 | ) | (5,681 | ) | (7,748 | ) | (8,632 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 8,899 | $ | 4,909 | $ | 9,585 | $ | (3,375 | ) | $ | (21,107 | ) | ||||||||
Net
income (loss) to common shareholders
|
$ | 4,889 | $ | 865 | $ | 4,238 | $ | (5,194 | ) | $ | (14,260 | ) | ||||||||
Net
income (loss) per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
& diluted
|
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.35 | $ | (0.46 | ) | $ | (1.31 | ) | ||||||||
Dividends
declared per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Common
|
$ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | ||||||||||
Series A and B
Preferred
|
$ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 0.8775 | ||||||||||
Series C
Preferred
|
$ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 1.0950 | ||||||||||
Series D
Preferred
|
$ | 0.9500 | $ | 0.9500 | $ | 0.9500 | $ | 0.6993 | $ | – |
December
31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||||||||||
Investments
|
$ | 333,735 | $ | 403,566 | $ | 756,409 | $ | 1,343,448 | $ | 1,853,675 | ||||||||||
Total
assets
|
374,758 | 466,557 | 805,976 | 1,400,934 | 1,865,235 | |||||||||||||||
Securitization
financing
|
204,385 | 211,564 | 516,578 | 1,177,280 | 1,679,830 | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase
agreements and senior notes
|
4,612 | 95,978 | 133,315 | 70,468 | 33,933 | |||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
232,822 | 330,019 | 656,642 | 1,252,168 | 1,715,389 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
141,936 | 136,538 | 149,334 | 148,766 | 149,846 | |||||||||||||||
Common
shares outstanding
|
12,136,262 | 12,131,262 | 12,163,391 | 12,162,391 | 10,873,903 | |||||||||||||||
Book
value per common share
|
$ | 8.22 | $ | 7.78 | $ | 7.65 | $ | 7.60 | $ | 7.55 |
ITEM
7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATION
|
SUMMARY
We are a
specialty finance company organized as a mortgage real estate investment trust
(REIT). We invest principally in single-family residential and
commercial mortgage loans and securities, both investment grade and
non-investment grade rated. Residential mortgage securities are
typically referred to as RMBS and commercial mortgage securities are typically
referred to as CMBS. We finance loans and RMBS and CMBS securities
through a combination of non-recourse securitization financing, repurchase
agreements and equity. We employ financing in order to increase the
overall yield on our invested capital. Our primary source of income
is net interest income, which is the excess of the interest income earned on our
investments over the cost of financing these investments. We
typically intend to hold securities to their maturity but may occasionally
record gains or losses from the sale of investments prior to their
maturity.
14
In recent
years, we have elected to sell certain non-core assets, including investments in
manufactured housing loans and delinquent property tax receivable portfolios, as
well as to contribute certain of our interests in a commercial mortgage loan
securitization trust to a joint venture, in order to reduce our exposure to
credit risk on these assets, increase our capital available for new investments,
and strengthen our balance sheet by reducing our overall
leverage. Our emphasis on strengthening the balance sheet and
developing investment partnerships, through joint ventures and other means, has
been in anticipation of redeploying our invested capital in more compelling
investment opportunities.
Over the
last several years, we have been able to steadily increase our book value per
common share while improving the quality of our investment assets and reducing
financial leverage. We have also been able to improve our net income
to common shareholders at the same time. During 2007, we earned net
income of $8.9 million, and net income to common shareholders of $4.9
million. As a REIT, we are required to distribute 90% of our REIT
taxable income. However, we may offset all or a portion of our REIT
taxable income with our NOL carryforwards.
In 2007,
we received a capital distribution of $18.2 million from our investment in our
joint venture. We used these funds primarily to reduce one of our two
outstanding repurchase agreements.
During
the fourth quarter of 2007, we reissued a securitization bond that was initially
issued in April 2002 and redeemed in April 2005. We received proceeds
of $35.3 million on the reissuance. Approximately $15.0 million of
the resulting cash receipts was used to pay down our repurchase agreement
balance. The remaining $20.4 million increased the Company’s
liquidity and is available to be invested or used for other general corporate
purposes.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
The
following table presents certain balance sheet items that had significant
activity, which are discussed after the table.
December
31,
|
||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Investments:
|
||||||||
Securitized mortgage loans,
net
|
$ | 278,463 | $ | 346,304 | ||||
Investment in joint
venture
|
19,267 | 37,388 | ||||||
Securities
|
29,231 | 13,143 | ||||||
Securitization
financing
|
204,385 | 211,564 | ||||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
4,612 | 95,978 | ||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
141,936 | 136,538 |
Securitized Mortgage Loans,
Net
Securitized
mortgage loans are comprised of loans secured by first deeds of trust on
single-family residential and commercial properties. The following
table presents our net basis in these loans at amortized cost, which includes
accrued interest receivable, discounts, premiums, deferred costs and reserves
for loan losses, by the type of property collateralizing the loan.
(amounts
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Securitized
mortgage loans, net:
|
||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 190,570 | $ | 228,466 | ||||
Single-family
|
87,893 | 117,838 | ||||||
278,463 | 346,304 |
Securitized
commercial mortgage loans includes the loans in two securitization trusts we
issued in 1993 and 1997, which have outstanding principal balances of $34.5
million and $151.5 million, respectively, at December 31, 2007. The
decrease in these loans was primarily related to scheduled and unscheduled
principal payments of $8.5 million and $30.4
15
million,
respectively. The large amount of prepayments during the year is
related to favorable commercial loan rates available in the market during the
year and the declining prepayment penalties to which the loans are subject as
the loans approach the end of their yield maintenance periods. We
also recaptured approximately $1.0 million of amounts previously provided for
losses on these commercial mortgage loans as a result of a decrease in estimated
losses on the commercial loan portfolio and charged-off approximately $0.5
million of losses against the allowance in 2007.
Securitized
single-family mortgage loans includes loans in one securitization trust we
issued in 2002 using loans that were principally originated between 1992 and
1997. The decrease in the single-family mortgage loans is related to
principal payments on the loans of $29.9 million, $26.1 million of which was
unscheduled. Although prepayments slowed on the single-family
mortgage loans during the year, the portfolio continues to have excellent credit
performance demonstrated by the significant decrease in the percentage of
single-family loans more than 60 days delinquent from 4.94% at December 31, 2006
to 3.02% at December 31, 2007 as well as having less than $0.1 million of
charge-offs during 2007.
Investment
in Joint Venture
The
decrease in our investment in the joint venture is primarily related to an $18.2
million distribution we received from the joint venture during 2007, which was
made in order to distribute excess uninvested capital in accordance with the
joint venture’s operating agreement. Recognizing our interest in the
earnings of the joint venture of $0.7 million increased our investment in the
joint venture but was offset by the recognition of $0.6 million for our interest
in the other comprehensive loss of the joint venture associated with the
decrease in value of the joint venture’s available for sale
securities.
Securities
Our
securities, which are classified as available for sale and carried at their fair
value, are comprised of the following:
(amounts
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Securities:
|
||||||||
Non-agency RMBS
|
$ | 7,726 | $ | 10,196 | ||||
Agency RMBS
|
7,456 | 1,663 | ||||||
Equity securities
|
9,701 | 1,284 | ||||||
Corporate debt
securities
|
4,348 | – | ||||||
$ | 29,231 | $ | 13,143 |
Non-agency
RMBS declined by approximately $2.5 million to $7.7 million at December 31,
2007. The decrease was primarily related to the principal payments
received on these securities during the year.
Agency
RMBS increased by $5.8 million to $7.5 million at December 31,
2007. This increase was primarily the result of the purchase of a
$6.7 million Agency RMBS during the fourth quarter of 2007, which was partially
offset by the receipt of $0.9 million of principal on our agency mortgage backed
securities portfolio during the year.
Equity
securities increased approximately $8.4 million and include preferred stock and
common stock issued by publicly-traded mortgage REITs. We purchased
approximately $9.2 million of equity securities during the year and sold $2.7
million on which we recognized a gain of $0.8 million.
We also
purchased a senior unsecured convertible note issued by a publicly-traded REIT
with a par value of $5.0 million during the year. The note had an
estimated fair value of $4.3 million at December 31, 2007.
16
Securitization
Financing
Securitization
financing are bonds issued by a securitization trust, which we sponsored and is
consolidated in our financial statements. These bonds are secured
only by the securitized mortgage loans pledged to the trust and are otherwise
non-recourse to us. Principal and interest on the bonds are paid from
the cash flows generated by the loans collateralizing the
bonds. The following table presents our net basis, which
includes accrued interest, discounts, premiums and deferred costs in
securitization financing.
(amounts
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Securitization
financing bonds:
|
||||||||
Fixed, secured by commercial
mortgage loans
|
$ | 170,623 | $ | 211,564 | ||||
Variable, secured by single-family
mortgage loans
|
33,762 | – | ||||||
$ | 204,385 | $ | 211,564 |
The fixed
rate bonds finance our securitized commercial mortgage loans, which are also
fixed rate. The $40.9 million decrease is primarily related to
principal payments on the bonds during 2007 of $38.8 million. There
was also $1.6 million of net amortization of bond premiums and deferred
costs. Approximately $34.5 million of these bonds are callable by us
in June of 2008. Those bonds have premiums and deferred costs
associated with them, representing a net credit of approximately $1.3 million,
which are being amortized over life of the bonds. If we choose to
call those bonds in 2008, any unamortized premium and deferred costs would be
written-off and recognized as a gain at that time.
Our
single-family securitized mortgage loans are financed by variable rate
securitization financing bonds. We redeemed all of the bonds issued
by this securitization trust in 2005, financing the redemption with repurchase
agreements and our own capital, and held the bonds for potential
reissue. During the fourth quarter of 2007, we reissued one of these
bonds at a $0.8 million discount to its par value of $36.1 million generating
proceeds of $35.3 million. Payments of $1.7 million were made on this
bond subsequent to its reissuance. We still hold a second bond issued
by this trust, which had a par value of $44.3 million at December 31, 2007 and
is partially financed with repurchase agreements, which are discussed
below. As the securitization trust which issued this bond is
consolidated in our financial statements, this bond is eliminated in our
consolidated financial statements.
Repurchase
Agreements
The
decline in repurchase agreements from the prior year was a result of $91.4
million of payments during 2007. The repurchase agreement outstanding
at December 31, 2007 of $4.6 million is financing the senior class bond issued
by our single-family securitization trust, which at December 31, 2007 had a par
value and fair value of $44.3 million and $43.0 million,
respectively.
Shareholders’
Equity
Shareholders’
equity increased by $5.4 million to $141.9 million primarily due to net income
to shareholders of $4.9 million and unrealized gains on investments of $0.4
million, which is net of realized gains on sales of equity securities of $0.8
million.
17
Supplemental
Discussion of Investments
We manage
our investment portfolio in large part based on our net capital invested in a
particular investment. Net capital invested, which is referred to as
“Net Investment” in the table below, is generally defined as the cost basis of
the investment net of the associated financing (securitization financing or
repurchase agreement) for that investment. Below is the Net
Investment basis as of December 31, 2007. We also estimate on a
periodic basis the fair value of this Net Investment. The
fair value of our Net Investment in securitized mortgage loans is based on the
present value of the projected cash flow from the loan collateral, adjusted for
the impact and assumed level of future prepayments and credit losses, less the
projected principal and interest due on the associated securitization financing
bonds owned by third parties. The fair value of securities is based
on quotes obtained from third-party dealers or is calculated by discounting
estimated future cash flows at estimated market rates where no dealer quotes are
available. We believe the fair value of Net Investment presented in
the table below is a reasonable approximation of our net asset value, excluding
other assets and other liabilities which are not included in the table
below.
December
31, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Amortized
cost basis
|
Financing (4)
|
Net
Investment
|
Fair
value of Net Investment
|
||||||||||||
Securitized
mortgage loans: (1)
|
||||||||||||||||
Single-family
mortgage loans
|
$ | 88,024 | $ | 38,374 | $ | 49,650 | $ | 45,761 | ||||||||
Commercial
mortgage loans
|
193,160 | 170,623 | 22,537 | 19,542 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(2,721 | ) | – | (2,721 | ) | – | ||||||||||
278,463 | 208,997 | 69,466 | 65,303 | |||||||||||||
Securities:
(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Investment
grade RMBS
|
14,810 | – | 14,810 | 14,843 | ||||||||||||
Non-investment
grade RMBS
|
284 | – | 284 | 339 | ||||||||||||
Equity
and other
|
12,426 | – | 12,426 | 14,049 | ||||||||||||
27,520 | – | 27,520 | 29,231 | |||||||||||||
Investment
in joint venture(3)
|
19,267 | – | 19,267 | 18,847 | ||||||||||||
Obligation
under payment agreement(1)
|
– | 16,796 | (16,796 | ) | (15,473 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
loans and investments(2)
|
6,774 | – | 6,774 | 7,407 | ||||||||||||
Net
unrealized gain(2)
|
1,711 | – | 1,711 | – | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 333,735 | $ | 225,793 | $ | 107,942 | $ | 105,315 | ||||||||
|
(1)
|
Fair
values for securitized mortgage loans and the obligation under payment
agreement are based on discounted cash flows using assumptions set forth
in the table below, inclusive of amounts invested in redeemed
securitization financing bonds.
|
|
(2)
|
Fair
values are based on dealer quotes, if available, and closing prices from a
national exchange where applicable. Approximately $22 million
of fair value of securities were based on available dealer quotes or
closing prices from a national exchange. Where dealer
quotes are not available, fair values are calculated as the net present
value of expected future cash flows, discounted at a weighted average
discount rate of 7.1% for investment grade securities and 36.1% for
non-investment grade securities.
|
|
(3)
|
Fair
value for investment in joint venture represents our share of the fair
value of the joint venture’s assets valued using methodologies
and assumptions consistent with Note 1
above.
|
|
(4)
|
Financing
includes securitization financing issued to third parties and repurchase
agreements.
|
18
The
following table summarizes the assumptions used in estimating fair value,
pursuant to Note 1 in the table above, for our Net Investment in securitized
mortgage loans and the cash flow related to those net investments during
2007.
Fair
Value Assumptions
|
|||||
Loan
type
|
Weighted-average
prepayment speeds
|
Losses
|
Weighted-average
discount
rate(6)
|
Projected
cash flow termination date
|
(amounts
in thousands)
2007
Cash Flows (1)
|
Single-family
mortgage loans
|
20%
CPR
|
0.2%
annually
|
20%
|
Anticipated
final maturity 2024
|
$ 2,757
|
Commercial
mortgage loans(2)
|
(3)
|
0.8%
annually
|
(4)
|
(5)
|
$ 2,590
|
(1)
|
Represents
the excess of the cash flows received on the collateral pledged over the
cash flow required to service the related securitization
financing. These
cash flows exclude the net principal and interest received on the senior
single family bond we owned at December 31,
2007.
|
(2)
|
Includes
loans pledged to two different securitization
trusts.
|
(3)
|
Assumed
constant prepayment rate (CPR) speeds generally are governed by underlying
pool characteristics, prepayment lock-out provisions, and yield
maintenance provisions. Loans currently delinquent in excess of
30 days are assumed to be liquidated in six months at a loss amount that
is calculated for each loan based on its specific
facts.
|
(4)
|
Weighed-average
discount rates for the two securitization trusts were 16.0% and 14.4%,
respectively.
|
(5)
|
Cash
flow termination dates are modeled based on the repayment dates of the
loans or optional redemption dates of the underlying securitization
financing bonds.
|
(6)
|
Represents
management’s estimate of the market discount rate that would be used by a
third party in valuing these or similar
assets.
|
The
following table presents the net investment basis included in the first table
above by their rating classification. Investments in the unrated and
non-investment grade classification primarily include equity securities and
commercial mortgage and single-family mortgage loans, which are unrated but are
substantially seasoned and performing. Securitization
over-collateralization generally includes the excess of the securitized mortgage
loans pledged over the outstanding bonds issued by the securitization
trust. The joint venture owns primarily interest in non-investment
grade CMBS.
December
31,
|
||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Investments:
|
||||||||
AAA
rated and Agency RMBS fixed income securities
|
$ | 53,849 | $ | 20,876 | ||||
AA
and A rated RMBS
|
449 | 2,777 | ||||||
Unrated
and non-investment grade
|
21,399 | 8,924 | ||||||
Securitization
over-collateralization
|
12,978 | 9,760 | ||||||
Investment
in joint venture
|
19,267 | 37,388 | ||||||
$ | 107,942 | $ | 79,725 |
Supplemental
Discussion of Common Equity Book Value
We
believe that our shareholders, as well as shareholders of other companies in the
mortgage REIT industry, consider book value per common share an important
measure. Our reported book value per common share is based on the
carrying value our assets and liabilities as recorded in the consolidated
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A substantial portion of our assets are carried on a
historical, or amortized, cost basis and not at estimated fair
value. The first table included in the “Supplemental Discussion of
Investments” section above compares the amortized cost basis of our investments
to their estimated fair value based on assumptions set forth in the second
table.
19
We
believe that book value per common share, adjusted to reflect the carrying value
of investments at their fair value (hereinafter referred to as Adjusted Common
Equity Book Value), is also a meaningful measure for our shareholders,
representing effectively our estimated going-concern net asset
value. The following table calculates Adjusted Common Equity Book
Value and Adjusted Common Equity Book Value per share using the estimated fair
value information contained in the “Estimated Fair Value of Net Investment”
table above. The amounts set forth in the table in the Adjusted Book
Value column include all of our financial assets and liabilities at their
estimated fair values, and exclude any value attributable to our NOL
carryforwards and other matters that might impact our value.
December
31, 2007
|
||||||||
(amounts
in thousands except per share information)
|
Book
Value
|
Adjusted
Book Value
|
||||||
Total
investment assets
|
$ | 107,942 | $ | 105,315 | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
35,352 | 35,352 | ||||||
Other
assets and liabilities, net
|
(1,358 | ) | (1,358 | ) | ||||
141,936 | 139,309 | |||||||
Less: Preferred
stock liquidation preference
|
(42,215 | ) | (42,215 | ) | ||||
Common
equity book value and adjusted book value
|
$ | 99,721 | $ | 97,094 | ||||
Common
equity book value per share and adjusted book value per
share
|
$ | 8.22 | $ | 8.00 |
Discussion of Credit
Risk
As
discussed in ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS above, the predominent risk in our
investment portfolio today is credit risk (i.e., the risk that we will not
receive all amounts contractually due us on an investment as a result of a
default by the borrower and the resulting deficiency in proceeds from the
liquidation of the collateral securing the obligation). In many
instances, we retained the “first-loss” credit risk on pools of loans and
securities that we have securitized. In addition to our retained
interests in certain securitizations, we also have credit risk on approximately
$3.7 million of unrated or non-investment grade mortgage securities and
loans.
The
following table summarizes our credit exposure in securitized mortgage loans and
subordinate mortgage securities.
Credit Reserves and Actual
Credit Losses
(amounts
in millions)
|
Credit
Exposure (1)
|
Credit
Exposure, Net of Allowance (2)
|
Actual
Credit
Losses
|
Credit
Exposure, Net of Allowance to Outstanding Loan Balance (3)
|
||||||||||||
2005
|
$ | 47.9 | $ | 28.9 | $ | 3.6 | 3.85 | % | ||||||||
2006
|
26.3 | 21.8 | 7.2 | 6.20 | ||||||||||||
2007
|
27.5 | 24.8 | 0.5 | 8.57 |
(1)
|
Represents
the overcollateralization pledged to a securitization trust and
subordinate securities we own, net of any
discounts.
|
(2)
|
Represents
credit exposure, net of allowance for loan
losses.
|
(3)
|
Represents
credit exposure net of allowance divided by current unpaid principal
balance of loans in the securitization
trust
|
Our net
credit exposure decreased from 2005 to 2006 primarily as a result of the
derecognition of $279.0 million of securitized commercial mortgage loans in
2006. The increase in our net credit exposure in 2007 is primarily
due to reduction in the balance of allowance for loan losses of $1.8 million as
a result of the improved performance of our securitized commercial mortgage loan
portfolio.
20
We
monitor and evaluate our exposure to credit losses and have established reserves
based upon anticipated losses, general economic conditions and trends in the
investment portfolio. Delinquencies as a percentage of all
outstanding securitized mortgage loans decreased to 2.7% at December 31, 2007
from 4.4% at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2007, management
believes the level of credit reserves is appropriate for currently existing
losses. The following tables summarize single-family mortgage loan
and commercial mortgage loan delinquencies as a percentage of the outstanding
commercial securitized mortgage loans or single-family balance for those
securitizations in which we have retained a portion of the direct credit
risk.
Loans
secured by low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) properties account for 88% of
the Company’s securitized commercial loan portfolio. Section 42 of
the Code provides tax credits to investors in projects to construct or
substantially rehabilitate properties that provide housing for qualifying low
income families. Failure to comply with certain income and rental
restrictions required by Section 42 or default on a loan financing a Section 42
property during the compliance period can result in the recapture of previously
received tax credits. The potential cost of tax credit recapture
provides an incentive to the property owner to support the property during the
compliance period. The following table shows the weighted average
remaining compliance period of our portfolio of LIHTC commercial loans at
December 31, 2007 as a percent of the total LIHTC commercial loan portfolio
.
Months
remaining to end of compliance period
|
As
a Percent of Unpaid Principal Balance
|
|||
Compliance
period already exceeded
|
26.5 | % | ||
Zero
through twelve months remaining
|
4.4 | |||
Thirteen
through thirty six months remaining
|
50.2 | |||
Thirty
seven through sixty months remaining
|
18.9 | |||
100.0 | % |
For
commercial mortgage loans, there were no delinquencies at December 31, 2007,
down from 1.36% percent of the outstanding securitized mortgage loans at
December 31, 2006. The commercial loan that was delinquent in 2006
liquidated with a net loss of $0.5 million during 2007 and had the greatest
impact on the reduction of the overall delinquency rate. The joint
venture, in which we have a 49.875% interest, currently has a single delinquent
commercial mortgage loan, which is not included in this analysis below and has
an unpaid principal balance of $1.4 million.
Commercial Mortgage Loan
Delinquency Statistics
December
31,
|
30
to 59 days
delinquent
|
60
to 89 days
delinquent
|
90
days and over
delinquent
(1)
|
Total
|
2005
|
–%
|
0.25%
|
6.65%
|
6.90%
|
2006
|
–%
|
–%
|
1.36%
|
1.36%
|
2007
|
–%
|
–%
|
–%
|
–%
|
(1)
|
Includes
foreclosures and real estate owned.
|
Single-family
mortgage loan delinquencies as a percentage of the outstanding loan balance
decreased by 1.62% to 8.22% at December 31, 2007 from 9.84% at December 31,
2006. Serious delinquencies, defined as 60+ day delinquencies,
declined from 4.94% to 3.02%. Our single-family loan portfolio, which
had an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $96.2 million at December 31, 2007,
was originated primarily between 1992 and 1997 and continues to perform and
pay-down as expected and with minimal losses. Approximately $6.1
million of these loans are credit enhanced with mortgage pool insurance
impacting realized losses. During 2007 and 2006, we incurred less
than $0.1 million of actual losses in each of those years.
21
Single-Family
Loan Delinquency Statistics
December
31,
|
30
to 59 days
delinquent
|
60
to 89 days
delinquent
|
90
days and over
delinquent
(1)
|
Total
|
2005
|
4.28%
|
0.62%
|
2.60%
|
7.50%
|
2006
|
4.90%
|
1.89%
|
3.05%
|
9.84%
|
2007
|
5.20%
|
0.58%
|
2.44%
|
8.22%
|
(1)
|
Includes
foreclosures and real estate owned.
|
Comparative
information on our results of operations is provided in the tables
below:
Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands except per share information)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Interest
income
|
$ | 30,778 | $ | 50,449 | $ | 74,395 | ||||||
Interest
expense
|
20,095 | 39,362 | 62,506 | |||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 10,683 | $ | 11,087 | $ | 11,889 | ||||||
Recapture
of (provision for) loan losses
|
1,281 | 15 | (5,780 | ) | ||||||||
Net
interest income after recapture of (provision for) loan
losses
|
11,964 | 11,102 | 6,109 | |||||||||
Equity
in earnings (loss) of joint venture
|
709 | (852 | ) | – | ||||||||
Loss
on capitalization of joint venture
|
– | (1,194 | ) | – | ||||||||
Impairment
charges
|
– | (60 | ) | (2,474 | ) | |||||||
Gain
(loss) on sales of investments
|
755 | (183 | ) | 9,609 | ||||||||
Other
(expense) income
|
(533 | ) | 617 | 2,022 | ||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(3,996 | ) | (4,521 | ) | (5,681 | ) | ||||||
Net
income
|
8,899 | 4,909 | 9,585 | |||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(4,010 | ) | (4,044 | ) | (5,347 | ) | ||||||
Net
income to common shareholders
|
$ | 4,889 | $ | 865 | $ | 4,238 | ||||||
Basic
& diluted net income per common share
|
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.35 | ||||||
Dividends
declared per share:
|
||||||||||||
Common
|
$ | – | $ | – | $ | – | ||||||
Series
D Preferred
|
$ | 0.95 | $ | 0.95 | $ | 0.95 |
2007 Compared to
2006
Interest
Income
Interest
income includes interest earned on our investment portfolio and also reflects
the amortization of any related discounts, premiums and deferred
costs. The following tables present the significant components of our
interest income.
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Interest
income:
|
||||||||
Securitized mortgage
loans
|
$ | 26,424 | $ | 46,240 | ||||
Securities
|
1,256 | 1,558 | ||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
2,611 | 2,015 | ||||||
Other loans and
investments
|
487 | 636 | ||||||
$ | 30,778 | $ | 50,449 |
22
The change in interest income on
securitized mortgage loans and securities is examined in the discussion and
tables that follow.
Interest
income on cash and cash equivalents increased $0.6 million in 2007 compared to
2006. This increase is primarily the result of an $11.9 million
increase in the average balance of cash and cash equivalents outstanding during
2007 compared to 2006. Interest income on other loans and investments
decreased $0.1 million to $0.5 million for 2007 compared to $0.6 million for
2006. This decrease was primarily related to a decrease in the
average balance of other loans and investments outstanding in 2007 compared to
2006 of $3.7 million and $4.7 million, respectively.
Interest
Income – Securitized Mortgage Loans
The
following table summarizes the detail of the interest income earned on our
securitized mortgage loans.
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Interest
Income
|
Net
Amortization
|
Total
Interest Income
|
Interest
Income
|
Net
Amortization
|
Total
Interest Income
|
||||||||||||||||||
Securitized
mortgage loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 18,114 | $ | 485 | $ | 18,599 | $ | 36,048 | $ | 654 | $ | 36,702 | ||||||||||||
Single-family
|
7,887 | (62 | ) | 7,825 | 10,109 | (571 | ) | 9,538 | ||||||||||||||||
Total
mortgage loans
|
$ | 26,001 | $ | 423 | $ | 26,424 | $ | 46,157 | $ | 83 | $ | 46,240 |
The
majority of the decrease of $18.1 million in interest income on commercial
mortgage loans is primarily related to $279.0 million of commercial mortgage
loans that were derecognized in September 2006. Those loans
contributed $14.7 million of interest income in 2006 and none in
2007. Excluding the loans that were derecognized during 2006, the
average balance of the other commercial mortgage loans outstanding during 2007
declined by approximately $33.1 million (13%) from the balance in
2006.
Interest
income on securitized single-family mortgage loans declined $1.7 million to $7.8
million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The decline in interest
income on single-family loans was primarily related to the decrease in the
balance of the loans outstanding, which declined approximately $38.8 million, or
approximately 28%, to $100.8 million for 2007. The drop in the
average balance of the loans was partially offset by an increase in the average
yield on our single-family loans, approximately 87% of which were variable rate
at December 31, 2007. Net amortization for single-family loans
also decreased $0.5 million to $0.1 million for 2007 as a result of a slow-down
in the rate of prepayments on the loans as well as a reduction in the estimated
future prepayment speeds.
Interest
Income – Securities
The following table presents the
components of interest income on securities.
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Non-agency
RMBS
|
$ | 925 | $ | 1,090 | ||||
Agency
RMBS
|
110 | 198 | ||||||
Corporate
debt securities and other interest bearing securities
|
221 | 270 | ||||||
$ | 1,256 | $ | 1,558 |
The modest decline in interest income
on securities is primarily related to the decline in the average balance of the
interest-earning securities as payments are received on those
securities.
23
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense includes the interest paid and accrued on our financings as well as the
amortization of any related discounts, premiums and deferred
costs. The following tables present the significant components of our
interest expense.
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||
Securitization
financing
|
$ | 14,999 | $ | 33,172 | ||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
3,546 | 5,933 | ||||||
Obligation under payment
agreement
|
1,525 | 489 | ||||||
Other
|
25 | (232 | ) | |||||
$ | 20,095 | $ | 39,362 |
Interest
Expense – Securitization Financing
The
following table summarizes the detail of the interest expense recorded on our
securitization financing bonds.
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Interest
Expense
|
Net
Amortization
|
Total
Interest Expense
|
Interest
Expense
|
Net
Amortization
|
Total
Interest Expense
|
||||||||||||||||||
Securitization
financing:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 15,856 | $ | (1,831 | ) | $ | 14,025 | $ | 33,003 | $ | (606 | ) | $ | 32,397 | ||||||||||
Single-family
|
387 | 62 | 449 | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||
Other bond related
costs
|
525 | – | 525 | 775 | – | 775 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
mortgage loans
|
$ | 16,768 | $ | (1,769 | ) | $ | 14,999 | $ | 33,778 | $ | (606 | ) | $ | 33,172 |
Interest
expense on commercial securitization financing decreased from $32.4 million for
2006 to $14.0 million for 2007. The majority of this $18.4 million
decrease is related to the derecognition of $254.5 million that were
derecognized in September 2006. The securitization financing
derecognized contributed approximately $16.0 million of interest expense in 2006
and none in 2007. The weighted average balance outstanding of the
remaining securitization financing decreased $36.0 million, or approximately
16%, from $230.0 million in 2006 to $193.9 million in 2007 and explains the
majority of the remaining decrease.
The
interest expense on single-family securitization financing is related to a
securitization bond that we redeemed in 2005 and reissued in the fourth quarter
of 2007. The net amortization is related to the $0.8 million discount
at which the bond was reissued.
Interest
Expense – Repurchase Agreements
The
repurchase agreements partially finance the single-family securitization bonds
that we redeemed in 2005. One of those bonds was reissued during
2007, as discussed above, and the related repurchase agreement financing was
repaid. We also elected to use some of our cash to significantly
reduce the balance of the other repurchase agreement. These
actions combined with regular payments on the repurchase agreements reduced the
weighted average balance of the repurchase agreements to $64.2 million in 2007
compared to $114.2 million in 2006, which represents almost a 44% reduction in
the average balance of the financing. This reduction in the balance
financed was partially offset by a slight increase in the average yield on the
financing from 5.12% in 2006 to 5.45% in 2007.
24
Interest
Expense – Obligation under Payment Agreement
We
entered into the obligation under payment agreement in September 2006, so the
year ended December 31, 2006 only reflected slightly more than three months of
expense compared to a full twelve months for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Recapture of (Provision for)
Loan Losses
We
recaptured approximately $1.3 million of reserves we had previously provided for
estimated losses on our securitized mortgage loan portfolio. The
decrease in the estimated losses was primarily related to improvements in the
performance of our commercial mortgage loan portfolio, which had no delinquent
loans as of December 31, 2007. The performance of our single-family
mortgage loan portfolio also improved with the percentage of single-family loans
delinquent more than 60 days declining from 4.94% at December 31, 2006 to 3.02%
at December 31, 2007.
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of
Joint Venture
Our interest in the operations of our
joint venture changed from a loss of $0.9 million to income of $0.7 million for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The joint
venture was formed in September 2006, and the 2006 loss related to an impairment
of a commercial mortgage backed security, which was larger than the income
generated by the joint venture’s other assets for the 2006 period. In
2007, the joint venture generated approximately $5.8 million of net interest
income, which was offset by a $3.3 million valuation adjustment to a call right
the joint venture has on certain bonds.
Loss on Capitalization of
Joint Venture
We recognized a loss of $1.2 million in
2006 on the capitalization of a joint venture related to our contribution of our
interest in a commercial loan securitization to the joint venture, and the
creation of an obligation under payment agreement in connection with the
formation of the joint venture. The contribution of our interests in
this securitization resulted in the derecognition of approximately $279.0
million of commercial securitized mortgage loans and $254.5 million of related
securitization financing in 2006.
General and Administrative
Expenses
General
and administrative expenses decreased by $0.5 million from $4.5 million to $4.0
million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. General and administrative expenses decreased during
2007 primarily due to a reduction in salaries and benefits related to the
closing of our tax lien servicing operation in Pennsylvania. We
also had lower expenses in 2007 associated with legal services and corporate
insurance costs.
2006 Compared to
2005
Interest
Income
Interest
income includes interest earned on our investment portfolio and also reflects
the amortization of any related discounts, premiums and deferred
costs. The following tables present the significant components of our
interest income.
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Interest
income:
|
||||||||
Securitized mortgage
loans
|
$ | 46,240 | $ | 68,387 | ||||
Securities
|
1,558 | 3,885 | ||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
2,015 | 767 | ||||||
Other loans and
investments
|
636 | 1,356 | ||||||
$ | 50,449 | $ | 74,395 |
25
Interest income on cash and cash
equivalents increased $1.2 million in 2006 compared to 2005. This
increase is primarily the result of a $10.9 million increase in the average
balance of cash and cash equivalents outstanding during 2006 compared to
2005. Interest income on other loans and investments decreased $0.7
million to $0.6 million for 2006 compared to $1.4 million for
2005. The decrease was primarily related to our decision in 2005 to
place our delinquent tax lien receivables on non-accrual due to the uncertainty
in the timing and quantity of the cash flows expected to be received on this
investment, which had a balance of $2.8 million and $4.1 million at December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
The change in interest income on securitized mortgage loans and securities is
examined in the discussion and tables that follow.
Interest
Income – Securitized Mortgage Loans
The
following table summarizes the detail of the interest income earned on our
securitized mortgage loans.
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Interest
Income
|
Net
Amortization
|
Total
Interest Income
|
Interest
Income
|
Net
Amortization
|
Total
Interest Income
|
||||||||||||||||||
Securitized
mortgage loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 36,048 | $ | 654 | $ | 36,702 | $ | 48,439 | $ | 976 | $ | 49,415 | ||||||||||||
Single-family
|
10,109 | (571 | ) | 9,538 | 11,484 | (840 | ) | 10,644 | ||||||||||||||||
Manufactured-housing
|
– | – | – | 8,268 | 60 | 8,328 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
mortgage loans
|
$ | 46,157 | $ | 83 | $ | 46,240 | $ | 68,191 | $ | 196 | $ | 68,387 |
Approximately
$10.9 million of the decrease of $12.7 million in interest income on commercial
mortgage loans is primarily related to $279.0 million of commercial mortgage
loans that were derecognized in September 2006. Those loans
contributed $25.6 million of interest income in 2005 versus $14.7 million in
2006. Excluding the loans that were derecognized during 2006, the
average balance of the other commercial mortgage loans outstanding during 2006
declined by approximately $22.9 million (8.4%) from the balance in
2005.
Interest
income on securitized single-family mortgage loans declined $1.1 million to $9.5
million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The decline in interest
income on single-family loans was primarily related to the decrease in the
balance of the loans outstanding, which declined approximately $54.1 million, or
about 28%, to $139.6 million for 2006. The drop in the average
balance of the loans was partially offset by an increase in the average yield on
our single-family loans, approximately 87% of which were variable rate at
December 31, 2006.
The
decline in interest income on manufactured-housing loans was due to the
derecognition of the loans in 2005 when we sold our interests in the related
securitization trusts.
Interest
Income – Securities
The following table presents the
components of interest income on securities.
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Mortgage
backed securities (non-agency)
|
$ | 1,090 | $ | 2,370 | ||||
Mortgage
backed securities (agency)
|
198 | 59 | ||||||
Corporate
debt securities and other interest bearing securities
|
270 | 1,456 | ||||||
$ | 1,558 | $ | 3,885 |
Interest income on securities decreased
primarily as the result of the final payoff of a variable rate security in May
2006 which contributed $1.3 million of interest income in 2005, a $0.6 million
decrease of interest income on short term securities and a $0.3 million decrease
of income on a home improvement loan security.
26
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense includes the interest paid and accrued on our financings as well as the
amortization of any related discounts, premiums and deferred
costs. The following tables present the significant components of our
interest expense.
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||
Securitization
financing
|
$ | 33,172 | $ | 57,166 | ||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
5,933 | 5,428 | ||||||
Obligation under payment
agreement
|
489 | – | ||||||
Other
|
(232 | ) | (88 | ) | ||||
$ | 39,362 | $ | 62,506 |
Interest
Expense – Securitization Financing
The
following table summarizes the detail of the interest expense recorded on our
securitization financing bonds.
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Interest
Expense
|
Net
Amortization
|
Total
Interest Expense
|
Interest
Expense
|
Net
Amortization
|
Total
Interest Expense
|
||||||||||||||||||
Securitization
financing:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 33,003 | $ | (606 | ) | $ | 32,397 | $ | 45,160 | $ | 1,477 | $ | 46,637 | |||||||||||
Single-family
|
– | – | – | 2,206 | 27 | 2,233 | ||||||||||||||||||
Manufactured
housing
|
– | – | – | 7,196 | (257 | ) | 6,939 | |||||||||||||||||
Other bond related
costs
|
775 | – | 775 | 1,357 | – | 1,357 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
mortgage loans
|
$ | 33,778 | $ | (606 | ) | $ | 33,172 | $ | 55,919 | $ | 1,247 | $ | 57,166 |
Interest
expense on commercial securitization financing decreased from $46.6 million for
2005 to $32.4 million for 2006. The majority of this $14.2 million
decrease is related to the derecognition of $254.5 million that was derecognized
in September 2006. The securitization financing derecognized
contributed approximately $28.5 million of interest expense in 2005 and $16.0
million in 2006. Excluding the commercial securitization financing
that was derecognized in 2006, the average balance of the other commercial
securitization financing decreased $30.4 million, or approximately 12%, from
$259.4 million in 2005 to $229.0 million in 2006 and explains the majority of
the remaining decrease.
The
interest expense on single-family securitization financing was related to
securitization financing bonds that we redeemed in 2005 and were not, therefore,
outstanding during 2006. Similarly, the interest expense on
manufactured housing securitization financing was related to securitization
financing bonds that were derecognized in 2005 when we sold our interest in the
related securitization trusts.
Interest
Expense – Repurchase Agreements
The
repurchase agreements partially finance the single-family securitization bonds
that we redeemed in 2005 and two fixed rate securities which were purchased in
2003 and 2004. Interest expense on the repurchase agreements
increased by $0.5 million as LIBOR increased from 2.53% at the beginning of 2005
to 5.32% at the end of 2006. This increase in LIBOR rates during 2005
and 2006 was partially offset by decreases in the financing
balances. Weighted average repurchase agreement balances decreased
from $151.3 million in 2005 to $114.2 million in 2006.
27
Interest
Expense – Obligation under Payment Agreement
We
entered into the obligation under payment agreement in September 2006, so the
year ended December 31, 2006 only reflected slightly more than 3 months of
expense with no expense in 2005.
Recapture of (Provision for)
Loan Losses
The
decline in the provision for loan losses from 2005 to 2006 was due primarily to
an increase in reserves in 2005 for a large commercial loan that became
delinquent in 2005; whereas, there were no new significant delinquent commercial
loans in 2006.
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of
Joint Venture
We entered a joint venture arrangement
in September 2006 with two unrelated parties. Our interest in the
operations of this joint venture ended its first year with a loss of $0.9
million to income. The 2006 loss related to an impairment of a
commercial mortgage backed security, which was larger than the income generated
by the joint venture’s other assets for the 2006 period.
Loss on Capitalization of
Joint Venture
We recognized a loss of $1.2 million
for 2006 on the capitalization of a joint venture related to our contribution of
a commercial loan securitization to the joint venture, and the creation of an
obligation under payment agreement in connection with the formation of the joint
venture. The contribution of our interests in this securitization
resulted in the derecognition of approximately $279.0 million of securitized
mortgage loans and $254.5 million of related securitization
financing.
Gain (Loss) on Sale of
Investments
The gain
of $9.6 million in 2005 was primarily related to an $8.2 million gain we
recognized on the sale of our interests in certain securitization trusts
collateralized primarily by manufactured housing loans and securities backed by
manufactured housing loans. We also sold approximately $2.0 million
of mezzanine loans in 2005 on which we recognized a $1.4 million
gain.
General and Administrative
Expenses
General
and administrative expenses decreased by $1.2 million from $5.7 million to $4.5
million for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2006,
respectively. General and administrative expenses decreased during
2006 primarily due to lower expenses in 2006 associated with legal and
accounting services.
28
Average Balances and
Effective Interest Rates
The
following table summarizes the average balances of interest-earning investment
assets and their average effective yields, along with the average
interest-bearing liabilities and the related average effective interest rates,
for each of the periods presented. Cash and cash equivalents and
assets that are on non-accrual status are excluded from the table below for each
period presented.
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Average
Balance
|
Effective
Rate
|
Average
Balance
|
Effective
Rate
|
Average
Balance
|
Effective
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets(1):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securitized mortgage loans(2)
|
$ | 315,962 | 8.35 | % | $ | 586,113 | 7.88 | % | $ | 931,777 | 7.19 | % | ||||||||||||
Other interest-bearing
assets
|
17,122 | 10.17 | % | 23,823 | 8.86 | % | 83,767 | 5.31 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
$ | 333,084 | 8.45 | % | $ | 609,936 | 7.92 | % | $ | 1,015,544 | 7.10 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securitization financing(3)
|
$ | 201,148 | 7.19 | % | $ | 401,050 | 8.08 | % | $ | 735,910 | 7.40 | % | ||||||||||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
64,231 | 5.45 | % | 114,252 | 5.12 | % | 151,328 | 3.59 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
$ | 265,379 | 6.77 | % | $ | 515,302 | 7.42 | % | $ | 887,238 | 6.75 | % | ||||||||||||
Net
interest spread(3)
|
1.68 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.35 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
yield on average interest-earning assets(3)(4)
|
3.05 | % | 1.64 | % | 1.20 | % |
(1)
|
Average
balances exclude any unrealized gains and losses on available for sale
securities.
|
(2)
|
Average
balances exclude funds held by trustees except defeased funds held by
trustees.
|
(3)
|
Effective
rates are calculated excluding non-interest related securitization
financing expenses.
|
(4)
|
Net
yield on average interest-earning assets reflects the annualized net
interest income, excluding non-interest related securitization financing
expense, divided by the average interest-earning assets for the
period. The 2007 value of 3.05% increased from 1.64% in 2006
primarily due to the derecognition of the commercial loan securitization
in 2006 and the substantial repayment of repurchase agreements in
2007.
|
2007
compared to 2006
The net
interest spread for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased 118 basis points
to 1.68% from 0.50% for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The increase in the net interest spread can be
attributed primarily to the derecognition of $279.0 million of securitized
commercial mortgage loans and $254.5 million of related securitization
financing, the Company’s interests in which were contributed to a joint venture
during the third quarter of 2006. The derecognized commercial
mortgage loans and securitization financing had yields of 7.44% and 9.14%,
respectively, during the time they were outstanding during
2006. Excluding the derecognized assets and liabilities from the 2006
yield would have resulted in a net interest spread of approximately 1.58%, which
is comparable to that reported for 2007.
The
overall yield on interest-earning assets, which exclude cash and cash
equivalents, increased to 8.45% for the year ended December 31, 2007 from 7.92%
for the same period in 2006 primarily as a result of the derecognition of the
securitized mortgage loans discussed above, which had an average yield of 7.44%
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and were responsible for approximately 23
basis points of the increase. The yield on our securitized
single-family mortgage loans increased 93 basis points to 7.74% for the year
ended December 31, 2007 as the rates on the variable rate loans in the trust,
which comprise approximately 87% of the loans, reset higher during the year
while the cost of the interest-bearing liabilities declined.
29
2006
compared to 2005
The net
interest spread for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased to 50 basis
points from 35 basis points for the year ended December 31,
2005. This increase in the net interest spread is due to
non-recurring defeased interest and yield maintenance income on liquidated and
delinquent commercial loans in 2006. In addition during 2006, the
increases in the average rate on the securitization financing, which were
financing variable rate single-family loans, slowed while interest rates on the
loans reset higher during the year, which helped increase the net interest
spread.
The
overall yield on interest-earning assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents,
increased to 7.92% for the year ended December 31, 2006 from 7.10% for the same
period in 2005 primarily as a result of an increase of approximately 150 basis
points in the weighted average coupon on our securitized single-family mortgage
loans, the majority of which have an adjustable rate based on LIBOR, and as a
result of the derecognition of $279.0 million in commercial mortgage loans
contributed to a joint venture during 2006. The effective rate on
interest-bearing liabilities increased from 6.75% to 7.42% as a result of the
overall increase in market interest rates. Approximately 20% of our
interest-bearing liabilities reprice monthly and are indexed to one-month LIBOR,
which averaged 5.10% for 2006, compared to 3.39% for 2005. The effect
of increasing market rates was muted by the derecognition of approximately
$254.5 million of non-recourse securitization financing, which was financing a
pool of commercial mortgage loans, our interests in which were contributed to a
joint venture.
Rates and
Volume
The
following table summarizes the amount of change in interest income and interest
expense due to changes in interest rates versus changes in volume:
2007
to 2006
|
2006
to 2005
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Rate
|
Volume
|
Total
|
Rate
|
Volume
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Securitized
mortgage loans
|
$ | 2,618 | $ | (22,421 | ) | $ | (19,803 | ) | $ | 5,973 | $ | (26,805 | ) | $ | (20,832 | ) | ||||||||
Other
interest-bearing assets
|
259 | (627 | ) | (368 | ) | 1,161 | (4,103 | ) | (2,942 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
2,877 | (23,048 | ) | (20,171 | ) | 7,134 | (30,908 | ) | (23,774 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Securitization
financing
|
(3,220 | ) | (14,702 | ) | (17,922 | ) | 4,577 | (26,675 | ) | (22,098 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
351 | (2,738 | ) | (2,387 | ) | 2,096 | (1,591 | ) | 505 | |||||||||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
(2,869 | ) | (17,440 | ) | (20,309 | ) | 6,673 | (28,266 | ) | (21,593 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 5,746 | $ | (5,608 | ) | $ | 138 | $ | 461 | $ | (2,642 | ) | $ | (2,181 | ) |
Note:
|
The
change in interest income and interest expense due to changes in both
volume and rate, which cannot be segregated, has been allocated
proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to
rate. This table excludes non-interest related securitization
financing expense, other interest expense and provision for credit
losses.
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based in large part upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of the financial statements
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Critical
accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant
judgments or uncertainties, and which may result in materially different results
under different assumptions and conditions, or the application of which may have
a material impact on our financial statements. The following are our
critical accounting policies.
30
Consolidation of
Subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements represent
our accounts after the elimination of inter-company transactions. We
consolidate entities in which we own more than 50% of the voting equity and
control of the entity does not rest with others and variable interest entities
in which it is determined to be the primary beneficiary in accordance with FIN
46(R). We follow the equity method of accounting for investments with
greater than 20% and less than a 50% interest in partnerships and corporate
joint ventures or when we are able to influence the financial and operating
policies of the investee but own less than 50% of the voting
equity. For all other investments, the cost method is
applied.
Securitization. We
have securitized loans and securities in a securitization financing transaction
by transferring financial assets to a wholly owned trust, and the trust issues
non-recourse bonds pursuant to an indenture. Generally, we retain
some form of control over the transferred assets, and/or the trust is not deemed
to be a qualified special purpose entity. In instances where the
trust is deemed not to be a qualified special purpose entity, the trust is
included in our consolidated financial statements. A transfer of
financial assets in which we surrender control over those assets is accounted
for as a sale to the extent that consideration other than beneficial interests
in the transferred assets is received in exchange. For accounting and
tax purposes, the loans and securities financed through the issuance of bonds in
a securitization financing transaction are treated as our assets, and the
associated bonds issued are treated as our debt as securitization
financing. We may retain certain of the bonds issued by the trust,
and we generally will transfer collateral in excess of the bonds
issued. This excess is typically referred to as
over-collateralization. Each securitization trust generally provides
us with the right to redeem, at our option, the remaining outstanding bonds
prior to their maturity date.
Impairments. We
evaluate all securities in our investment portfolio for other-than-temporary
impairments. A security is generally defined to be
other-than-temporarily impaired if, for a maximum period of three consecutive
quarters, the carrying value of such security exceeds its estimated fair value
and we estimate, based on projected future cash flows or other fair value
determinants, that the fair value will remain below the carrying value for the
foreseeable future. If an other-than-temporary impairment is deemed
to exist, we record an impairment charge to adjust the carrying value of the
security down to its estimated fair value. In certain instances, as a
result of the other-than-temporary impairment analysis, the recognition or
accrual of interest will be discontinued and the security will be placed on
non-accrual status.
We
consider an investment to be impaired if the fair value of the investment is
less than its recorded cost basis. Impairments of other investments
are generally considered to be other-than-temporary when the fair value remains
below the carrying value for three consecutive quarters. If the
impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge is
recorded in order to adjust the carrying value of the investment to its
estimated value.
Allowance for Loan
Losses. An allowance for loan losses has been estimated and
established for currently existing probable losses for loans in the Company’s
investment portfolio that are considered impaired. Factors considered
in establishing an allowance include current loan delinquencies, historical cure
rates of delinquent loans, and historical and anticipated loss severity of the
loans as they are liquidated. The factors differ by loan type (e.g.,
single-family versus commercial) and collateral type (e.g., multifamily versus
office). The allowance for losses is evaluated and adjusted
periodically by management based on the actual and estimated timing and amount
of probable credit losses, using the above factors, as well as industry loss
experience. Where loans are considered homogeneous, the allowance for
losses is established and evaluated on a pool basis. Otherwise, the
allowance for losses is established and evaluated on a loan-specific
basis. Provisions made to increase the allowance are charged as a
current period expense. Single-family loans are considered impaired
when they are 60-days past due. Commercial mortgage loans are
evaluated on an individual basis for impairment. Commercial mortgage
loans are secured by income-producing real estate and are evaluated for
impairment when the debt service coverage ratio on the loan is less than
1:1. Certain of the commercial mortgage loans are covered by loan
guarantees that limit the Company’s exposure on these loans.
Loans
secured by low-income housing tax credit properties account for 88% of the
Company’s securitized commercial loan portfolio. Section 42 of the
Code provides tax credits to investors in projects to construct or substantially
rehabilitate properties that provide housing for qualifying low income
families. Failure to comply with certain income and rental
restrictions required by Section 42 or default on a loan financing a Section 42
property during the compliance period can result in the recapture of previously
received tax credits. The potential cost of tax credit recapture
provides an incentive to the property owner to support the property during the
compliance period.
31
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have
historically financed our investments and operations from a variety of sources,
including a mix of collateral-based short-term financing sources such as
repurchase agreements, collateral-based long-term financing sources such as
securitization financing, equity capital, and net earnings. Our
primary source of funding for our operations today is the cash flow generated
from our existing investment portfolio assets, which includes net interest
income and principal payments and prepayments on these
investments. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity and
capital resources to continue to service all of our outstanding recourse
obligations, pay operating costs and fund dividends on our capital
stock.
At
December 31, 2007, we had cash and equivalents of $35.4 million. We
anticipate that there will be a favorable investment climate in 2008 and beyond
and therefore we anticipate utilizing our existing excess capital to fund
additional investments. Assuming the availability of capital from
more efficiently leveraging our asset base, before raising any additional
capital from the issuance of common or preferred stock, we anticipate that we
would have approximately $75 million available to invest. This amount
includes $7.3 million from the sale of certain equity investments in January
2008.
We
anticipate investing the majority of our $75 million of investable capital in
2008, principally in Agency RMBS but also potentially in non-agency RMBS and
CMBS, all of which would be ‘AAA’-rated, or near-‘AAA’ rated. If we
deploy the majority of our capital and still believe there are attractive
investments available, we anticipate raising additional equity capital if such
capital could be raised at an attractive valuation.
In
deploying new capital, we are likely to utilize repurchase agreement financing
which will subject us to liquidity risk driven by fluctuations in market values
of the collateral pledged to support the reverse repurchase
agreement. We will attempt to mitigate these risks by limiting the
investments that we purchase to higher-credit quality investments, and by
managing certain aspects of the investments such as potential market value
changes from changes in interest rates, as much as possible.
From the
cash flow generated by our investment portfolio, we fund our operating overhead
costs, pay the dividend on the Series D Preferred Stock and service any
outstanding debt. Our investment portfolio continues to provide
positive cash flow, which can be utilized by us for reinvestment
purposes. We have primarily utilized our cash flow during 2007 to pay
down repurchase agreement financing. Relative to others in our
industry, our capital base is less leveraged, and we have much greater financial
flexibility and resources.
Management
believes that our investment portfolio cash flows will be adequate over the next
twelve months to fund our operating needs and to pay dividends.
During
2007, we reissued a securitization bond that was initially issued in April 2002
and that had previously been redeemed in April 2005. We received
proceeds of $35.3 million on the sale. In addition, the joint venture
distributed $36.5 million of its capital to its three members during 2007, $18.2
million of which was received by the Company.
We
believe that investment opportunities for our capital may be more readily
available in the foreseeable future as disruptions in the fixed income markets,
particularly in the residential mortgage market, has caused a decline in prices
on most residential mortgage securities. These disruptions have
caused volatility in asset prices, causing such asset prices to decline,
correspondingly increasing yields. Equity prices on companies which
originate or invest in these securities have also declined. As a
result, we have evaluated several potential investment opportunities for
residential mortgage securities, but to date, have not made meaningful
investments of our capital. The timing of any reinvestment will
depend on the investment opportunity available and whether, in the opinion of
management and the Board of Directors, such investment represents an acceptable
risk-adjusted return opportunity for the Company’s capital.
We
currently utilize a combination of equity, securitization financing and
repurchase agreement financing to finance our investment
portfolio. Securitization financing represents bonds issued that are
recourse only to the assets pledged as collateral to support the financing and
are not otherwise recourse to us. At December 31, 2007, we had $204.4
million of non-recourse securitization financing outstanding, most of which
carries a fixed rate of interest. The maturity of each class of
securitization financing is directly affected by the rate of principal
prepayments on the related collateral and is not subject to margin call
risk. Each series is also subject to redemption according to specific
terms of the respective indentures, generally
32
on the
earlier of a specified date or when the remaining balance of the bond equals 35%
or less of the original principal balance of the bonds. One series of
bonds with a principal balance of $29.7 million at December 31, 2007 and
collateralized by commercial mortgage loans is redeemable at par on June 15,
2008.
Repurchase
agreement financing is recourse to the assets pledged and to the resources of
our company and requires us to post margin (i.e., collateral deposits in excess
of the repurchase agreement financing). The repurchase agreement
counterparty at any time can request that we post additional margin or repay all
financing balances. Repurchase agreement financing is not committed
financing to the Company, and it generally renews or rolls every 30
days. The amounts advanced to the Company by the repurchase agreement
counterparty are determined largely based on the fair value of the asset pledged
to the counterparty, subject to its willingness to provide
financing. During 2007, we paid off one of our repurchase agreements
and paid down the other in order to reduce our leverage and as a result of the
unfavorable renewal terms available due to market conditions. During
the fourth quarter, we paid down an additional $31.0 million on the repurchase
agreement and renewed the remaining balance for 30 days at LIBOR +
0.10%.
Contractual Obligations and
Commitments
The
following table shows expected cash payments on our contractual obligations as
of December 31, 2007 for the following time periods:
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Payments
due by period
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations(1)
|
Total
|
<
1 year
|
1-3
years
|
3-5
years
|
>
5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
Long-Term
Debt Obligations:(2)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Securitization
financing(3)
|
$ | 252,979 | $ | 26,800 | $ | 146,772 | $ | 56,412 | $ | 22,995 | ||||||||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
4,612 | 4,612 | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||
Operating
lease obligations
|
60 | 60 | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage
servicing obligations (4)
|
4,944 | 408 | 1,135 | 648 | 2,753 | |||||||||||||||
Obligation
under payment agreement(5)
|
23,282 | 1,582 | 2,958 | 18,742 | – | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 285,877 | $ | 33,462 | $ | 150,865 | $ | 75,802 | $ | 25,748 |
(1)
|
As
the master servicer for certain of the series of non-recourse
securitization financing securities which we have issued, and certain
loans which have been securitized but for which we are not the master
servicer, we have an obligation to advance scheduled principal and
interest on delinquent loans in accordance with the underlying servicing
agreements should the primary servicer fail to make such
advance. Such advance amounts are generally repaid in the same
month as they are made, or shortly thereafter, and the contractual
obligation with respect to these advances is excluded from the above
table.
|
(2)
|
Amounts
presented for Long-Term Debt Obligations include estimated principal and
interest on the related
obligations.
|
(3)
|
Securitization
financing is non-recourse to us as the bonds are payable solely from loans
and securities pledged as securitized mortgage loans. Payments
due by period were estimated based on the principal repayments forecast
for the underlying loans and securities, substantially all of which is
used to repay the associated securitization financing
outstanding.
|
(4)
|
Represents
anticipated payments made by us to the subservicer of certain loans
pledged to a securitization trust where we have an obligation to pay
subservicing fees in excess of amounts paid by the trust
.
|
(5)
|
We
entered an agreement to contribute to a joint venture all of the net cash
flows, including principal and interest, from our interests in
a pool of securitized commercial mortgage loans. By agreement,
the joint venture is scheduled to dissolve no later than
2011.
|
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We do not
believe that any off-balance sheet arrangements exist that are reasonably likely
to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes
in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity,
capital expenditures or capital resources.
33
Selected Quarterly
Results
The
following tables present our unaudited selected quarterly results for 2007 and
2006.
Summary
of Selected Quarterly Results (unaudited)
(amounts
in thousands except per share data)
Year
Ended December 31, 2007
|
First
Quarter
|
Second
Quarter
|
Third
Quarter
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
||||||||||||
Operating
results:
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
$ | 8,215 | $ | 8,023 | $ | 7,473 | $ | 7,067 | ||||||||
Net
interest income after recapture of provision for loan
losses
|
2,983 | 3,665 | 2,584 | 2,732 | ||||||||||||
Net
income (2)
|
1,942 | 2,702 | 2,686 | 1,569 | ||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted net income per common share
|
0.08 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared per common share
|
– | – | – | – | ||||||||||||
Average
interest-earning assets
(3)
|
359,115 | 343,436 | 324,087 | 306,234 | ||||||||||||
Average
borrowed funds
|
301,139 | 287,263 | 256,311 | 217,816 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest spread on interest-earning assets
(4)
|
1.35 | % | 2.17 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.79 | % | ||||||||
Average
asset yield
|
8.32 | % | 8.41 | % | 8.44 | % | 8.63 | % | ||||||||
Net
yield on average interest-earning assets(1)
|
2.48 | % | 3.19 | % | 2.86 | % | 2.77 | % | ||||||||
Cost
of funds(4)
|
6.97 | % | 6.24 | % | 7.05 | % | 6.85 | % |
Year
Ended December 31, 2006
|
First
Quarter
|
Second
Quarter
|
Third
Quarter
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
||||||||||||
Operating
results:
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
$ | 14,766 | $ | 14,192 | $ | 13,000 | $ | 8,491 | ||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
2,407 | 2,543 | 3,102 | 3,050 | ||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
1,213 | 1,615 | (215 | ) | 2,297 | |||||||||||
Basic
and diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
0.01 | 0.05 | (0.10 | ) | 0.11 | |||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared per common share
|
– | – | – | – | ||||||||||||
Average
interest-earning assets (3)
|
764,682 | 713,000 | 588,306 | 375,152 | ||||||||||||
Average
borrowed funds
|
635,877 | 609,813 | 502,842 | 316,388 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest spread on interest-earning assets
|
(0.13 | )% | 0.14 | % | 0.83 | % | 2.00 | % | ||||||||
Average
asset yield
|
7.59 | % | 7.68 | % | 8.39 | % | 8.28 | % | ||||||||
Net
yield on average interest-earning assets (1)
|
1.18 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.90 | % | 2.95 | % | ||||||||
Cost
of funds
|
7.72 | % | 7.54 | % | 7.56 | % | 6.28 | % |
(1)
|
Computed
as net interest margin excluding non-interest non-recourse securitization
financing expenses divided by average interest-earning
assets.
|
(2)
|
The
decrease in net income during the fourth quarter of 2007 relates primarily
to losses incurred by a joint venture, which is accounted for under the
equity method. The loss was related to a $3.9 million decrease
in the fair value of an investment.
|
(3)
|
Excludes
cash and cash equivalents.
|
(4)
|
Second
quarter 2007 net interest spread increased compared to other quarters and
cost of funds decreased due to amortization of asset discounts and bond
premiums resulting from the prepayment of three commercial loans that
constituted 17% of outstanding UPB.
|
34
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain
written statements in this Form 10-K that are not historical
fact constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange
Act. All statements contained in this annual report addressing the
results of operations, our operating performance, events, or developments that
we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, including statements relating
to investment strategies, net interest income growth, earnings or earnings per
share growth, and market share, as well as statements expressing optimism or
pessimism about future operating results, are forward-looking
statements. The forward-looking statements are based upon
management’s views and assumptions as of the date of this report, regarding
future events and operating performance and are applicable only as of the dates
of such statements. Such forward-looking statements may involve
factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from historical
results or from any results expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements, which may be based on assumptions and anticipated
events that do not materialize.
Factors
that may cause actual results to differ from historical results or from any
results expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include the
following:
Reinvestment. Asset
yields today are generally lower than those assets sold or repaid, due to lower
overall interest rates and more competition for these assets as investment
assets have repaid or been sold. We have generally been unable to
find investments which have acceptable risk adjusted yields. As a
result, our net interest income has been declining, and may continue to decline
in the future, resulting in lower earnings per share over time. In
order to maintain our investment portfolio size and our earnings, we need to
reinvest a portion of the cash flows we receive into new interest-earning
assets. If we are unable to find suitable reinvestment opportunities,
the net interest income on our investment portfolio and investment cash flows
could be negatively impacted.
Economic
Conditions. We are affected by general economic
conditions. An increase in the risk of defaults and credit risk
resulting from an economic slowdown or recession could result in a decrease in
the value of our investments and the over-collateralization associated with its
securitization transactions. As a result of our being heavily
invested in short-term high quality investments, a worsening economy, however,
could also benefit us by creating opportunities for us to invest in assets that
become distressed as a result of the worsening conditions. These
changes could have an effect on our financial performance and the performance on
our securitized loan pools.
Investment Portfolio Cash
Flow. Cash flows from the investment portfolio fund our
operations, dividends, and repayments of outstanding debt, and are subject to
fluctuation due to changes in interest rates, repayment rates and default rates
and related losses, particularly given the high degree of internal structural
leverage inherent in our securitized investments. Based on the
performance of the underlying assets within the securitization structure, cash
flows which may have otherwise been paid to us as a result of our ownership
interest may be retained within the structure. Cash flows from the
investment portfolio are likely to sequentially decline until we meaningfully
begin to reinvest our capital. There can be no assurances that we
will find suitable investment alternatives for our capital, nor can there be
assurances that we will meet our reinvestment and return hurdles.
Defaults. Defaults
by borrowers on loans we securitized may have an adverse impact on our financial
performance, if actual credit losses differ materially from our estimates or
exceed reserves for losses recorded in the financial statements. The
allowance for loan losses is calculated on the basis of historical experience
and management’s best estimates. Actual default rates or loss
severity may differ from our estimate as a result of economic
conditions. Actual defaults on adjustable rate mortgage loans may
increase during a rising interest rate environment. In addition,
commercial mortgage loans are generally large dollar balance loans, and a
significant loan default may have an adverse impact on our financial
results. Such impact may include higher provisions for loan losses
and reduced interest income if the loan is placed on non-accrual.
Interest Rate
Fluctuations. Our income and cash flow depends on our ability
to earn greater interest on our investments than the interest cost to finance
these investments. Interest rates in the markets served by us
generally rise or fall with interest rates as a whole. Approximately
$220 million of our investments, including loans and securities currently
pledged as securitized mortgage loans and securities, are fixed rate and
approximately $75 million of our investments are variable rate. We
currently finance these fixed rate assets through $167 million of fixed rate
securitization financing, $34
35
million
of variable rate securitization financing, and $5 million of variable rate
repurchase agreements. The net interest spread for these investments
could decrease during a period of rapidly rising short-term interest rates,
since the investments generally have interest rates which reset on a delayed
basis and have periodic interest rate caps; the related borrowing has no delayed
resets or such interest rate caps.
Third-party
Servicers. Our loans and loans underlying securities are
serviced by third-party service providers. As with any external
service provider, we are subject to the risks associated with inadequate or
untimely services. Many borrowers require notices and reminders to
keep their loans current and to prevent delinquencies and
foreclosures. A substantial increase in our delinquency rate that
results from improper servicing or loan performance in general could harm our
ability to securitize our real estate loans in the future and may have an
adverse effect on our earnings.
Prepayments. Prepayments
by borrowers on loans we securitized may have an adverse impact on our financial
performance. Prepayments are expected to increase during a declining
interest rate or flat yield curve environment. Our exposure to rapid
prepayments is primarily (i) the faster amortization of premium on the
investments and, to the extent applicable, amortization of bond discount, and
(ii) the replacement of investments in its portfolio with lower yielding
investments.
Competition. The
financial services industry is a highly competitive market in which we compete
with a number of institutions with greater financial resources. In
purchasing portfolio investments and in issuing securities, we compete with
other mortgage REITs, investment banking firms, savings and loan associations,
commercial banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, federal agencies and
other entities, many of which have greater financial resources and a lower cost
of capital than we do. Increased competition in the market and our
competitors greater financial resources have adversely affected us and may
continue to do so. Competition may also continue to keep pressure on
spreads resulting in us being unable to reinvest our capital on an acceptable
risk-adjusted basis.
Regulatory
Changes. Our businesses as of and for the year ended December
31, 2007 were not subject to any material federal or state regulation or
licensing requirements. However, changes in existing laws and
regulations or in the interpretation thereof, or the introduction of new laws
and regulations, could adversely affect us and the performance of our
securitized loan pools or our ability to collect on our delinquent property tax
receivables. We are a REIT and are required to meet certain tests in
order to maintain our REIT status as described in the earlier discussion of
“Federal Income Tax Considerations.” If we should fail to maintain
our REIT status, we would not be able to hold certain investments and would be
subject to income taxes.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. We are required to comply with the provisions of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations
promulgated by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. Failure to
comply may result in doubt in the capital markets about the quality and adequacy
of our internal controls and corporate governance. This could result
in our having difficulty in, or being unable to, raise additional capital in
these markets in order to finance our operations and future
investments.
Other. The
following risks, which are discussed in more detail in ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS
above, could also affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows:
|
·
|
We
may be unable to invest in new assets with attractive yields, and yields
on new assets in which we do invest may not generate attractive returns,
resulting in a decline in our earnings per share over
time.
|
|
·
|
New
investments may entail risks that we do not currently have in our
investment portfolio or may substantially add risks to the investment
portfolio which we may or may not have managed in the past as part of our
investment strategy. In addition, while we have owned Agency
RMBS in the past, we have never had a significant amount of our capital
invested in these assets.
|
|
·
|
Competition
may prevent us from acquiring new investments at favorable yields
potentially negatively impacting our
profitability.
|
|
·
|
Our
ownership of certain subordinate interests in securitization trusts
subjects us to credit risk on the underlying loans, and we provide for
loss reserves on these loans as required under
GAAP.
|
|
·
|
Our
efforts to manage credit risk may not be successful in limiting
delinquencies and defaults in underlying loans or losses on our
investments.
|
36
|
·
|
Certain
investments employ internal structural leverage as a result of the
securitization process, and are in the most subordinate position in the
capital structure, which magnifies the potential impact of adverse events
on our cash flows and reported
results.
|
|
·
|
We may
be subject to the risks associated with inadequate or untimely services
from third-party service providers, which may harm our results of
operations.
|
|
·
|
Prepayments
of principal on our investments, and the timing of prepayments, may impact
our reported earnings and our cash
flows.
|
|
·
|
We
may finance a portion of our investment portfolio with short-term recourse
repurchase agreements which may subject us to margin calls if the assets
pledged subsequently decline in
value.
|
|
·
|
Interest
rate fluctuations can have various negative effects on us, and could lead
to reduced earnings and/or increased earnings
volatility.
|
|
·
|
Hedging
against interest rate exposure may adversely affect our
earnings.
|
|
·
|
Our
reported income depends on accounting conventions and assumptions about
the future that may change.
|
|
·
|
Failure
to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect our dividend distributions and
could adversely affect the value of our
securities.
|
|
·
|
Maintaining
REIT status may reduce our flexibility to manage our
operations.
|
|
·
|
We
may fail to properly conduct our operations so as to avoid falling under
the definition of an investment company pursuant to the Investment Company
Act of 1940.
|
|
·
|
We
are dependent on certain key
personnel.
|
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51.” SFAS
160 addresses reporting requirements in the financial statements of
non-controlling interests to their equity share of subsidiary
investments. SFAS 160 applies to reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the potential
impact on adoption of SFAS 160.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” SFAS 159 permits entities to choose
to measure many financial instruments, and certain other items, at fair
value. SFAS 159 applies to reporting periods beginning after November
15, 2007. The Company does not expected the adoption of SFAS 159 in
the first quarter of 2008 to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements”, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007 and all interim periods within
those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted provided that
the reporting entity has not yet issued interim or annual financial statements
for that fiscal year. The Company does not expected the adoption of
SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008 to have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
On
January 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attributes for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. Our adoption of FIN 48 did not have a
material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
On
January 1, 2007, we adopted SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial
Assets — An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” This Statement
requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each
time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a
servicing contract in certain situations and to initially measure those
servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value, if
practicable. The Company elected the option to measure its servicing
rights at fair value at each reporting date with changes in fair value recorded
in its earnings. The Company’s adoption of SFAS 156 did not have a
material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
37
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141-R, “Business Combinations” which
revised SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” This pronouncement is
effective as of January 1, 2009. Under SFAS 141, organizations
utilized the announcement date as the measurement date for the purchase price of
the acquired entity. SFAS 141-R requires measurement at the date the
acquirer obtains control of the acquiree, generally referred to as the
acquisition date. SFAS 141-R will have a significant impact on the
accounting for transaction costs, restructuring costs as well as the initial
recognition of contingent assets and liabilities assumed during a business
combination. Under SFAS 141-R, adjustments to the acquired entity’s
deferred tax assets and uncertain tax position balances occurring outside the
measurement period are recorded as a component of the income tax expense, rather
than goodwill. As the provisions of SFAS 141-R are applied
prospectively, the impact cannot be determined until the transactions
occur. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that
SFAS 141-R may have on the Company’s financial statements.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
Market
risk generally represents the risk of loss that may result from the potential
change in the value of a financial instrument due to fluctuations in interest
and foreign exchange rates and in equity and commodity prices. Market
risk is inherent to both derivative and non-derivative financial instruments,
and accordingly, the scope of our market risk management extends beyond
derivatives to include all market risk sensitive financial
instruments. As a specialty finance company, net interest income
comprises the primary component of our earnings and cash flows. We
are subject to risk resulting from interest rate fluctuations to the extent that
there is a gap between the amount of our interest-earning assets and the amount
of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid, mature or re-price within
specified periods.
We
monitor the aggregate cash flow, projected net interest income and estimated
market value of our investment portfolio under various interest rate and
prepayment assumptions. While certain investments may perform poorly
in an increasing or decreasing interest rate environment, other investments may
perform well, and others may not be impacted at all.
We
specifically focus on the sensitivity of our investment portfolio cash flow,
primarily the cash flow generated from the net interest income of our investment
portfolio, and measure such sensitivity to changes in interest
rates. Changes in interest rates are defined as instantaneous,
parallel, and sustained interest rate movements in 100 basis point
increments. Because cash and cash equivalents are such a large
portion of our overall assets, we also calculate the sensitivity of our cash
flows including cash and cash equivalents as if they are part of our investment
portfolio. For both analyses, we estimate our net interest income
cash flow for the next twenty-four months assuming interest rates over such time
period follow the forward LIBOR curve (based on 90-day Eurodollar futures
contracts) as of December 31, 2007, which we refer to as the Base
Case. Once the Base Case has been estimated, net interest income cash
flows are projected for each of the defined interest rate
scenarios. Those scenario results are then compared against the Base
Case to determine the estimated change to cash flow. To the extent we
have any cash flow changes from interest rate swaps, caps, floors or any other
derivative instrument, they are included in this analysis.
The
following table summarizes our net interest income cash flow and sensitivity
analyses as of December 31, 2007 under the assumptions set forth
above. These analyses represent management’s estimate of the change
in net interest income cash flow (expressed in dollar terms and as a percentage
of the Base Case) for the investment portfolio only and the investment portfolio
inclusive of cash and cash equivalents, given a parallel shift in interest rates
as discussed above.
As noted
above, the Base Case represents the interest rate environment as it existed as
of December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2007, both one-month LIBOR
and six-month LIBOR was 4.60%. The analysis below is heavily
dependent upon the assumptions used in the model. The effect of
changes in future interest rates beyond the forward LIBOR curve, the shape of
the yield curve or the mix of our assets and liabilities may cause actual
results to differ significantly from the modeled results. In
addition, certain investments which we own provide a degree of “optionality.”
The most significant option affecting our portfolio is the borrowers’ option to
prepay the loans. The model applies prepayment rate assumptions
representing management’s estimate of prepayment activity on a projected basis
for each collateral pool in the investment portfolio. The model
applies the same prepayment rate assumptions for all five cases indicated
below. The extent to which borrowers utilize the ability to exercise
their option may cause actual results to significantly differ from the
analysis. Furthermore, the projected results assume no additions or
subtractions to our portfolio, and no change to our liability
structure. Historically, there have been significant changes in our
investment portfolio and the liabilities incurred by us. As a result
of anticipated prepayments on assets in the investment portfolio, there are
likely to be such changes in the future.
38
Investment
Portfolio
|
Investment
Portfolio, including Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|||||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
Basis
Point Change in Interest Rates
|
Cash
Flow
|
Percent
|
Cash
Flow
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||
+200
|
$ | 15,035 | 5.4 | % | $ | 19,553 | 13.5 | % | ||||||||
+100
|
14,675 | 2.9 | % | 18,420 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||
Base
Case
|
14,265 | – | 17,235 | – | ||||||||||||
-100
|
14,237 | (0.2 | )% | 16,432 | (4.7 | )% | ||||||||||
-200
|
14,583 | 2.2 | % | 16,011 | (7.1 | )% |
As noted
in the table above, net interest income cashflow from our investment portfolio
is generally largely insulated from shifts in interest rates due principally to
the fact that we have match-funded a large percentage of our
investments. Approximately $220 million of our investment
portfolio is comprised of loans or securities that have coupon rates that are
fixed. Approximately $75 million of our investment portfolio as of
December 31, 2007 was comprised of loans or securities that have coupon rates
which adjust over time (subject to certain periodic and lifetime limitations) in
conjunction with changes in short-term interest
rates. Approximately $167 million of our liabilities are
fixed rate and approximately $39 million are floating rate liabilities, which
reset monthly based on one-month LIBOR. Approximately 69%, 10% and 9%
of the adjustable rate loans underlying our securitized mortgage loans are
indexed to and reset based upon the level of six-month LIBOR, one-year constant
maturity treasury rate and prime rate, respectively.
Generally,
during a period of rising short-term interest rates, our net interest income
earned and the corresponding cash flow on our investment portfolio will
decrease. The decrease of the net interest spread results from
(i) fixed rate loans and investments financed with variable rate debt, (ii)
the lag in resets of the adjustable rate loans relative to the rate resets on
the associated borrowings, and (iii) rate resets on the adjustable rate
loans which are generally limited to 1% every six months or 2% every twelve
months and subject to lifetime caps, while the associated borrowings have no
such limitation. As to item (i), we have substantially limited our
interest rate risk by match funding fixed rate assets and variable rate
assets. As to items (ii) and (iii), as short-term interest rates
stabilize and the adjustable rate loans reset, the net interest margin may be
partially restored as the yields on the adjustable rate loans adjust to market
conditions.
Net
interest income may increase following a fall in short-term interest
rates. This increase may be temporary as the yields on the adjustable
rate loans generally reset less frequently than floating-rate liabilities and
are limited as to how much they actually reset. The net interest
spread may also be increased or decreased by the proceeds or costs of interest
rate swap, cap or floor agreements, to the extent that we have entered into such
agreements.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA
Our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes, together with the
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon, are set
forth on pages F-1 through F-25 of this Form 10-K.
ITEM
9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
|
Not
applicable.
ITEM
9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we carried out an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d – 15(e) under the
Exchange, as of the end of the period covered by this report (the Evaluation
Date). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and
principal financial
39
officer
concluded that as of the Evaluation Date our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective to provide reasonable assurance that we record, process,
summarize and report within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms
the information we must disclose in reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the
fourth quarter of 2007 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our
internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes, in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Because of inherent limitations, a system of
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
due to change in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Our
management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in “Internal
Control-Integrated Framework.” Based on that evaluation, our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the
period covered by this report.
The
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 has
been audited by BDO Seidman, LLP, the independent registered public accounting
firm that also audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included
in this Form 10-K. BDO Seidman, LLP’s attestation report on the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting appears
on page F-4 hereof.
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
The
information required by Item 10 is included in the proxy statement for our 2008
Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the 2008 Proxy Statement) under the captions
“Election of Directors,” “Committees of the Board,” “Code of Ethics” and
“Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and is incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The
information required by Item 11 is included in the 2008 Proxy Statement under
the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Directors’ Compensation,” and is
incorporated herein by reference.
40
ITEM
12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The
information required by Item 12 is included in the 2008 Proxy Statement under
the caption “Ownership of Stock,” and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The
following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2007, with respect to
the Company’s equity compensation plans, under which shares of our common stock
are authorized for issuance.
Plan
Category
|
Number
of Securities to Be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants
and Rights
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
|
Number
of Securities Remaining Available
for
Future Issuance
Under
Equity
Compensation
Plans (2)
|
|||||||||
Equity
Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders:
|
||||||||||||
2004
Stock Incentive Plan
|
373,146 | (1) | $ | 7.53 | 1,126,854 | |||||||
Equity
Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders(2)
|
– | – | – | |||||||||
Total
|
373,146 | $ | 7.53 | 1,126,854 |
(1)
|
Amount
includes all SAR awards to employees and stock option awards to
directors.
|
(2)
|
The
Company does not have any equity compensation plans that have not been
approved by shareholders.
|
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The
information required by Item 13 is included in the 2008 Proxy Statement under
the captions “Related Person Transactions” and “Director Independence,”and is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The
information required by Item 14 is included in the 2008 Proxy Statement under
the caption “Audit Information,” and is incorporated herein by
reference.
41
PART IV
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Documents filed as part of
this report:
1.
and 2.
|
Financial
Statements and Schedules
The
information required by this section of Item 15 is set forth in the
Consolidated Financial Statements and Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm beginning at page F-1 of this Form
10-K. The index to the Financial Statements is set forth at
page F-2 of this Form 10-K.
|
3.
|
Exhibits
|
Number
|
Exhibit
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation, as amended, effective as of February 4, 1988
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to Dynex’s Amendment No.
1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-10783) filed March
21, 1997).
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Dynex’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 21, 2006).
|
3.3
|
Amendment
to Articles of Incorporation, effective December 29, 1989 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to Dynex’s Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-10783) filed March 21,
1997).
|
3.4
|
Amendment
to Articles of Incorporation, effective October 19, 1992 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Dynex’s Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-10783) filed March 21,
1997).
|
3.5
|
Amendment
to Articles of Incorporation, effective April 25, 1997 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to Dynex’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997).
|
3.6
|
Amendment
to Articles of Incorporation, effective June 17, 1998 (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to Dynex’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004).
|
3.7
|
Amendment
to Articles of Incorporation, effective August 2, 1999 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.8 to Dynex’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004).
|
3.8
|
Amendment
to Articles of Incorporation, effective May 18,
2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to
Dynex’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2004).
|
42
Number
|
Exhibit
|
10.1*
|
Dynex
Capital, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to Dynex’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004).
|
10.2*
|
Form
of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the Dynex
Capital, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to Dynex’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2005).
|
10.3*
|
Form
of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement for Senior Executives under the
Dynex Capital, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Dynex’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2005).
|
10.4
|
Limited
Liability Company Agreement of Copperhead Ventures, LLC dated September 8,
2006 (portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for
confidential treatment) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to Dynex’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2006).
|
10.5*
|
Severance
Agreement between Dynex and Stephen J. Benedetti dated June 11, 2004
(filed herewith).
|
21.1
|
List
of consolidated entities of Dynex (filed herewith).
|
23.1
|
Consent
of BDO Seidman, LLP (filed herewith).
|
31.1
|
Certification
of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
31.2
|
Certification
of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
32.1
|
Certification
of principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith).
|
________________________________________
* Denotes management
contract.
(b) Exhibits: See
Item 15(a)(3) above.
(c) Financial Statement
Schedules: None.
43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DYNEX CAPITAL, INC.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
February
27, 2008
|
/s/
Stephen J. Benedetti
|
|
Stephen
J. Benedetti, Executive Vice President and
Chief
Operating Officer
|
||
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
/s/
Thomas B. Akin
|
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
|
February
27, 2008
|
Thomas
B. Akin
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
/s/
Stephen J. Benedetti
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief
|
February
27, 2008
|
Stephen
J. Benedetti
|
Operating
Officer
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
||
/s/
Jeffrey L. Childress
|
Controller
|
February
27, 2008
|
Jeffrey
L. Childress
|
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|
/s/
Leon A. Felman
|
Director
|
February
27, 2008
|
Leon
A. Felman
|
||
/s/
Barry Igdaloff
|
Director
|
February
27, 2008
|
Barry
Igdaloff
|
||
/s/
Daniel K. Osborne
|
Director
|
February
27, 2008
|
Daniel
K. Osborne
|
||
/s/
Eric P. Von der Porten
|
Director
|
February
27, 2008
|
Eric
P. Von der Porten
|
||
44
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
For
Inclusion in Form 10-K
Annual
Report Filed with
Securities
and Exchange Commission
December
31, 2007
F-1
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated
Financial Statements:
Page
|
||
Reports
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-3
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets – As of December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income -- Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005
|
F-6
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders’ Equity -- Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005
|
F-7
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows -- Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005
|
F-8
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-9
|
F-2
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of
Directors and Shareholders
Dynex
Capital, Inc.
Glen
Allen, Virginia
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dynex Capital, Inc.
(Dynex) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated statements
of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are
the responsibility of Dynex’s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Dynex at December 31, 2007
and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), Dynex's internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated February 6, 2008 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
BDO
SEIDMAN, LLP
Richmond,
Virginia
February
6, 2008
F-3
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of
Directors and Shareholders
Dynex
Capital, Inc.
Glen
Allen, Virginia
We have
audited Dynex Capital, Inc.’s (Dynex) internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Dynex’s management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
Dynex’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit
also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, Dynex maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Dynex
Capital, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2007 and our report dated February 6,
2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
BDO
SEIDMAN, LLP
Richmond,
Virginia
February
6, 2008
F-4
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
December
31, 2007 and 2006
(amounts
in thousands except share data)
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 35,352 | $ | 56,880 | ||||
Other
assets
|
5,671 | 6,111 | ||||||
41,023
|
62,991 | |||||||
Investments:
|
||||||||
Securitized
mortgage loans, net
|
278,463 | 346,304 | ||||||
Investment
in joint venture
|
19,267 | 37,388 | ||||||
Securities
|
29,231 | 13,143 | ||||||
Other
loans and investments
|
6,774 | 6,731 | ||||||
333,735 | 403,566 | |||||||
$ | 374,758 | $ | 466,557 | |||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Securitization
financing
|
$ | 204,385 | $ | 211,564 | ||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
4,612 | 95,978 | ||||||
Obligation
under payment agreement
|
16,796 | 16,299 | ||||||
Other
liabilities
|
7,029 | 6,178 | ||||||
232,822 | 330,019 | |||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies (Note 14)
|
||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, par value $.01 per share,
|
||||||||
50,000,000 shares
authorized:
|
||||||||
9.5% Cumulative Convertible
Series D,
|
||||||||
4,221,539 shares issued and
outstanding
|
41,749 | 41,749 | ||||||
($43,218 aggregate liquidation
preference)
|
||||||||
Common
stock, par value $.01 per share, 100,000,000 shares
authorized,
|
||||||||
12,136,262 and 12,131,262 shares
issued and outstanding, respectively
|
121 | 121 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
366,716 | 366,637 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
1,093 | 663 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(267,743 | ) | (272,632 | ) | ||||
141,936 | 136,538 | |||||||
$ | 374,758 | $ | 466,557 |
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
Years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(amounts
in thousands except share data)
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Interest
income:
|
||||||||||||
Securitized
mortgage loans
|
$ | 26,424 | $ | 46,240 | $ | 68,387 | ||||||
Securities
|
1,256 | 1,558 | 3,885 | |||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
2,611 | 2,015 | 767 | |||||||||
Other
loans and investments
|
487 | 636 | 1,356 | |||||||||
30,778 | 50,449 | 74,395 | ||||||||||
Interest
and related expense:
|
||||||||||||
Securitization
financing
|
14,999 | 33,172 | 57,166 | |||||||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
3,546 | 5,933 | 5,428 | |||||||||
Obligation
under payment agreement
|
1,525 | 489 | – | |||||||||
Other
|
25 | (232 | ) | (88 | ) | |||||||
20,095 | 39,362 | 62,506 | ||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
10,683 | 11,087 | 11,889 | |||||||||
Recapture
of (provision for) loan losses
|
1,281 | 15 | (5,780 | ) | ||||||||
Net
interest income after recapture of (provision for) loan
losses
|
11,964 | 11,102 | 6,109 | |||||||||
Impairment
charges
|
– | (60 | ) | (2,474 | ) | |||||||
Equity
in income (loss) of joint venture, net
|
709 | (852 | ) | – | ||||||||
Loss
on capitalization of joint venture
|
– | (1,194 | ) | – | ||||||||
Gain
(loss) on sale of investments, net
|
755 | (183 | ) | 9,609 | ||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(3,996 | ) | (4,521 | ) | (5,681 | ) | ||||||
Other
(expense) income
|
(533 | ) | 617 | 2,022 | ||||||||
Net
income
|
8,899 | 4,909 | 9,585 | |||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(4,010 | ) | (4,044 | ) | (5,347 | ) | ||||||
Net
income to common shareholders
|
$ | 4,889 | $ | 865 | $ | 4,238 | ||||||
Net
income per common share:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.35 |
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
Years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
(amounts
in thousands except share data)
Preferred
Stock
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at January 1, 2005
|
$ | 55,666 | $ | 122 | $ | 366,896 | $ | 3,817 | $ | (277,735 | ) | $ | 148,766 | |||||||||||
Net
income
|
– | – | – | – | 9,585 | 9,585 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts
related to hedge instruments, net
|
– | – | – | 609 | – | 609 | ||||||||||||||||||
Change
in market value of securities
|
– | – | – | (4,276 | ) | – | (4,276 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net losses included in net income
|
– | – | – | (10 | ) | – | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
5,908 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
– | – | – | – | (5,347 | ) | (5,347 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
– | – | 7 | – | – | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
55,666 | 122 | 366, 903 | 140 | (273,497 | ) | 149,334 | |||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
– | – | – | – | 4,909 | 4,909 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in market value of securities
|
– | – | – | 891 | – | 891 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net (gains) included in net income
|
– | – | – | (368 | ) | – | (368 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
5,432 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption
of preferred stock
|
(13,917 | ) | – | (155 | ) | – | – | (14,072 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Conversion
of preferred stock for common stock
|
– | – | 4 | – | – | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
– | – | – | – | (4,044 | ) | (4,044 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase
of common stock
|
– | (1 | ) | (219 | ) | – | – | (220 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Stock
option issuance
|
– | – | 104 | – | – | 104 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
41,749 | 121 | 366,637 | 663 | (272,632 | ) | 136,538 | |||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
– | – | – | – | 8,899 | 8,899 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in market value of securities
|
– | – | – | 1,256 | – | 1,256 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net (gains) included in net income
|
– | – | – | (826 | ) | – | (826 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
9,329 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
– | – | – | – | (4,010 | ) | (4,010 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock
option exercise
|
– | – | 37 | – | – | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock
option issuance
|
– | – | 42 | – | – | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
$ | 41,749 | $ | 121 | $ | 366,716 | $ | 1,093 | $ | (267,743 | ) | $ | 141,936 |
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
Years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(amounts
in thousands except share data)
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 8,899 | $ | 4,909 | $ | 9,585 | ||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to cash provided by
operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Equity
in (earnings) loss of joint venture
|
(709 | ) | 852 | – | ||||||||
Distribution
of joint venture earnings
|
1,125 | – | – | |||||||||
Loss
on capitalization of joint venture
|
– | 1,194 | – | |||||||||
(Recapture
of) provision for loan loss
|
(1,281 | ) | (15 | ) | 5,780 | |||||||
Impairment
charges
|
– | 60 | 2,474 | |||||||||
(Gain)
loss on sale of investments
|
(755 | ) | 183 | (9,609 | ) | |||||||
Amortization
and depreciation
|
(583 | ) | (538 | ) | 2,607 | |||||||
Stock
based compensation expense
|
306 | 244 | – | |||||||||
Net
change in other assets and other liabilities
|
1,023 | 536 | 1,500 | |||||||||
Net
cash and cash equivalents provided by operating
activities
|
8,025 | 7,425 | 12,337 | |||||||||
Investing
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Principal
payments received on securitized mortgage loans
|
68,787 | 93,945 | 144,532 | |||||||||
Purchase
of securities and other investments
|
(27,882 | ) | (17,221 | ) | (56,246 | ) | ||||||
Payments
received on securities, other loans and investments
|
9,871 | 28,819 | 117,264 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from sales of securities and other investments
|
3,762 | 3,348 | 15,321 | |||||||||
Return
of capital from joint venture
|
17,095 | – | – | |||||||||
Other
|
1,035 | (385 | ) | 168 | ||||||||
Net
cash and cash equivalents provided by investing
activities
|
72,668 | 108,506 | 221,039 | |||||||||
Financing
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Principal
payments on securitization financing
|
(40,547 | ) | (48,283 | ) | (102,510 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds
on sale of bonds
|
35,289 | – | – | |||||||||
Redemption
of securitization financing
|
– | – | (195,653 | ) | ||||||||
(Repayment
of) borrowings under repurchase agreements, net
|
(92,990 | ) | (37,337 | ) | 62,847 | |||||||
Redemption
of preferred stock
|
– | (14,068 | ) | – | ||||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
37 | – | – | |||||||||
Repurchase
of common stock
|
– | (220 | ) | – | ||||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(4,010 | ) | (4,378 | ) | (5,347 | ) | ||||||
Net
cash and cash equivalents used in financing activities
|
(102,221 | ) | (104,286 | ) | (240,663 | ) | ||||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(21,528 | ) | 11,645 | (7,287 | ) | |||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
56,880 | 45,235 | 52,522 | |||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$ | 35,352 | $ | 56,880 | $ | 45,235 |
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
December
31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
(amounts
in thousands except share and per share data)
NOTE
1 – ORGANIZATION
Dynex
Capital, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (the Company), has elected to be
treated as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for federal income tax
purposes. In order to maintain its status as a REIT, the Company must
comply with several requirements under the Internal Revenue Code (the
Code). The Company believes it has complied with the requirements for
qualification as a REIT under the Code.
The Company was incorporated in the
Commonwealth of Virginia in 1987 and is currently based in Glen Allen,
Virginia.
NOTE
2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP)
and the instructions to the Form 10-K. The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company, its qualified REIT subsidiaries
and its taxable REIT subsidiary. All intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain
amounts for 2005 and 2006 have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation. Stock based compensation expense on liability awards
were reclassified from other liabilities to stock based compensation expense in
the statement of cash flows. Amounts previously reported separately
as other investments and other loans have now combined and are being reported as
other loans and investments.
Consolidation
of Subsidiaries
The
consolidated financial statements represent the Company’s accounts after the
elimination of inter-company transactions. The Company consolidates
entities in which it owns more than 50% of the voting equity and control does
not rest with others and variable interest entities in which it is determined to
be the primary beneficiary in accordance with FIN 46(R). The Company
follows the equity method of accounting for investments with greater than 20%
and less than a 50% interest in partnerships and corporate joint ventures or
when it is able to influence the financial and operating policies of the
investee but owns less than 50% of the voting equity.
Federal
Income Taxes
The
Company believes it has complied with the requirements for qualification as a
REIT under the Code. As such, the Company believes that it qualifies
as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and it generally will not be subject
to federal income tax on the amount of its income or gain that is distributed as
dividends to shareholders. The Company uses the calendar year for
both tax and financial reporting purposes. There may be differences
between taxable income and income computed in accordance with GAAP.
Investments
Securitized Mortgage loans.
Securitized mortgage loans consist of loans pledged to support the
repayment of securitization financing bonds issued by the
Company. Securitized mortgage loans are reported at amortized
cost. An allowance has been established for currently existing losses
on such loans. Securities pledged, if any, are reported at estimated
fair value. Securitized mortgage loans can only be sold subject to
the lien of the respective securitization financing indenture.
F-9
Investment in Joint
Venture. The Company accounts for its investment in joint
venture using the equity method as it does not exercise control over significant
asset decisions such as buying, selling or financing nor is it the primary
beneficiary under Financial Interpretation No. 46(R). Under the
equity method, the Company increases its investment for its proportionate share
of net income and contributions to the joint venture and decreases its
investment balance by recording its proportionate share of net loss and
distributions.
The
Company periodically reviews its investment in joint venture for other than
temporary declines in market value. Any decline that is not expected
to be recovered in the next twelve months is considered other than temporary,
and an impairment charge is recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of the
investment. No impairment charges were recognized with respect to the
Company’s investment in joint venture.
Securities. Securities
include debt and equity securities, which are considered available-for-sale and
are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from
earnings and reported as accumulated other comprehensive income. The
basis used to determine the gain or loss on any debt and equity securities sold
is the specific identification method and average cost method,
respectively.
Other
Investments. Other investments include unsecuritized
delinquent property tax receivables, securities backed by delinquent property
tax receivables, and real estate owned. The unsecuritized delinquent
property tax receivables are carried at amortized cost. Securities
backed by delinquent property tax receivables are classified as
available-for-sale and are carried at estimated fair value.
Other
investments also include real estate owned acquired through, or in lieu of,
foreclosure in connection with the servicing of the delinquent tax lien
receivables portfolio. Such investments are considered held for sale
and are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell (net realizable
value) at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost
basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, management periodically performs
valuations and adjusts the property to the lower of cost and net realizable
value. Revenue and expenses related to and changes in the valuation
of the real estate owned are included in other income (expense).
Other Loans. Other
loans are carried at amortized cost.
Interest
Income. Interest income is recognized when earned according to
the terms of the underlying investment and when, in the opinion of management,
it is collectible. For loans, the accrual of interest is discontinued
when, in the opinion of management, the interest is not collectible in the
normal course of business, when the loan is significantly past due or when the
primary servicer of the loan fails to advance the interest and/or principal due
on the loan. For securities and other investments, the accrual of
interest is discontinued when, in the opinion of management, it is probable that
all amounts contractually due will not be collected. Loans are
considered past due when the borrower fails to make a timely payment in
accordance with the underlying loan agreement, inclusive of all applicable cure
periods. All interest accrued but not collected for investments that
are placed on a non-accrual status or are charged-off is reversed against
interest income. Interest on these investments is accounted for on
the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual
status. Investments are returned to accrual status when all the
principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future
payments are reasonably assured.
Premiums,
Discounts, Debt Issuance Costs and Hedging Basis Adjustments
Premiums,
discounts and hedging basis adjustments on investments and obligations are
amortized into interest income or expense, respectively, over the life of the
related investment or obligation using the effective yield
method. Hedging basis adjustments on associated debt obligations are
amortized over the expected remaining life of the debt instrument. If
the indenture for a particular debt obligation provides for a step-up of
interest rates on the optional redemption date for that obligation and the
Company has the ability and intent to exercise its call option, then premiums,
discounts, and hedging basis adjustments are amortized to that optional
redemption date. Otherwise, these amounts are amortized over the
estimated remaining life of the obligation. Costs incurred in
connection with the issuance of debt are deferred and amortized over the
estimated lives of their respective debt obligations using the effective yield
method.
F-10
Derivative
Financial Instruments
On
occasion, the Company may enter into interest rate swap agreements, interest
rate cap agreements, interest rate floor agreements, financial forwards,
financial futures and options on financial futures (Interest Rate Agreements) to
manage its sensitivity to changes in interest rates. These interest
rate agreements are intended to provide income and cash flow to offset potential
reduced net interest income and cash flow under certain interest rate
environments. At the inception of an Interest Rate Agreement, these
instruments are designated as either hedge positions or trading positions using
criteria established in SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities” (as amended). If, at the inception of an Interest
Rate Agreement, formal documentation is prepared that describes the risk being
hedged, identifies the hedging instrument and the means to be used for assessing
the effectiveness of the hedge and if it can be demonstrated that the hedging
instrument will be highly effective at hedging the risk exposure, the derivative
instrument will be designated as a cash flow hedge
position. Otherwise, an Interest Rate Agreement will be classified as
a trading position.
For
Interest Rate Agreements designated as cash flow hedges, the Company evaluates
the effectiveness of these hedges against the financial instrument being
hedged. The effective portion of the hedge relationship on an
interest rate agreement designated as a cash flow hedge is reported in
accumulated other comprehensive income, and the ineffective portion of such
hedge is reported in income. Amounts in accumulated other
comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings in the same period during
which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Derivative instruments
are carried at fair value in the financial statements of the
Company.
As a part
of the Company’s interest rate risk management process, the Company may be
required periodically to terminate hedge instruments. Any basis
adjustments or changes in the fair value of hedges recorded in other
comprehensive income are recognized into income or expense in conjunction with
the original hedge or hedged exposure.
If the
underlying asset, liability or commitment is sold or matures, the hedge is
deemed partially or wholly ineffective, or the criteria that was executed at the
time the hedge instrument was entered into no longer exists, the interest rate
agreement no longer qualifies as a designated hedge. Under these
circumstances, such changes in the market value of the Interest Rate Agreement
are recognized in current income.
For
Interest Rate Agreements entered into for trading purposes, realized and
unrealized changes in fair value of these instruments are recognized in the
consolidated statements of operations as trading income or loss in the period in
which the changes occur or when such trade instruments are
settled. Amounts receivable from counter-parties, if any, are
included on the consolidated balance sheets in other assets.
Cash
Equivalents
Cash and
cash equivalents include cash on hand and highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less. The Company has cash and
cash equivalents on deposit at individual financial institutions that are in
excess of federally insured amounts.
Net
Income Per Common Share
Net
income per common share is presented on both a basic net income per common share
and diluted net income per common share basis. Diluted net income per
common share assumes the conversion of the convertible preferred stock into
common stock, using the if-converted method, and stock options, using the
treasury stock method, but only if these items are dilutive. Each
share of preferred stock is convertible into one share of common
stock.
F-11
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during
the reported period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. The primary estimates inherent in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements are discussed below.
Fair
Value. Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried
in the accompanying financial statements at estimated fair
value. Estimates of fair value for securities may be based on market
prices provided by certain dealers. Estimates of fair value for
certain other securities are determined by calculating the present value of the
projected cash flows of the instruments using estimates of market-based discount
rates, prepayment rates and credit loss assumptions.
Estimates
of fair value for financial instruments are based primarily on management’s
judgment. Since the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments
is based on estimates, actual fair values recognized may differ from those
estimates recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The fair
value of all financial instruments is presented in Note 9.
Allowance for Loan
Losses. An allowance for loan losses has been estimated and
established for currently existing probable losses for loans in the Company’s
investment portfolio that are considered impaired. Factors considered
in establishing an allowance include current loan delinquencies, historical cure
rates of delinquent loans, and historical and anticipated loss severity of the
loans as they are liquidated. The factors differ by loan type (e.g.,
single-family versus commercial) and collateral type (e.g., multifamily versus
office). The allowance for losses is evaluated and adjusted
periodically by management based on the actual and estimated timing and amount
of probable credit losses, using the above factors, as well as industry loss
experience. Where loans are considered homogeneous, the allowance for
losses are established and evaluated on a pool basis. Otherwise, the
allowance for losses is established and evaluated on a loan-specific
basis. Provisions made to increase the allowance are charged as a
current period expense. Single-family loans are considered impaired
when they are 60 days past due. Commercial mortgage loans are
evaluated on an individual basis for impairment. Commercial mortgage
loans are secured by income-producing real estate and are evaluated for
impairment when the debt service coverage ratio on the loan is less than
1:1. Certain of the commercial mortgage loans are covered by loan
guarantees that limit the Company’s exposure on these loans.
Loans
secured by low-income housing tax credit properties account for 88% of the
Company’s securitized commercial loan portfolio. Section 42 of the
Code provides tax credits to investors in projects to construct or substantially
rehabilitate properties that provide housing for qualifying low income
families. Failure to comply with certain income and rental
restrictions required by Section 42 or default on a loan financing a Section 42
property during the compliance period can result in the recapture of previously
received tax credits. The potential cost of tax credit recapture
provides an incentive to the property owner to support the property during the
compliance period.
Impairments of
Securities. The Company evaluates all securities in its
investment portfolio for other-than-temporary impairments. A security
is generally defined to be other-than-temporarily impaired if, for a maximum
period of three consecutive quarters, the carrying value of such security
exceeds its estimated fair value, and the Company estimates, based on projected
future cash flows or other fair value determinants, that the fair value will
remain below the carrying value for the foreseeable future. If an
other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to exist, the Company records an
impairment charge to adjust the carrying value of the security down to its
estimated fair value. In certain instances, as a result of the
other-than-temporary impairment analysis, the recognition or accrual of interest
will be discontinued and the security will be placed on non-accrual
status. Securities normally are not placed on non-accrual status if
the servicer continues to advance on the impaired loans in the
security.
F-12
The
Company considers an investment to be impaired if the fair value of the
investment is less than its recorded cost basis. Impairments of other
investments are generally considered to be other-than-temporary when the fair
value remains below the carrying value for three consecutive
quarters. If the impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary,
an impairment charge is recorded in order to adjust the carrying value of the
investment to its estimated value.
Mortgage Servicing
Rights. The Company retains the primary servicing rights for
certain of its loans and subcontracts the performance of the primary servicing
to unrelated third parties. The Company adopted SFAS No. 156,
“Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets – An Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140” on January 1, 2007, and now accounts for its mortgage
servicing rights at fair value with changes in fair value reported in
earnings.
Contingencies. In
the normal course of business, there are various lawsuits, claims, and
contingencies pending against the Company. In accordance with SFAS
No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” we have established provisions for
estimated losses from pending claims, investigations and
proceedings. Although the ultimate outcome of the various matters
cannot be ascertained at this point, it is the opinion of management, after
consultation with counsel, that the resolution of the foregoing matters will not
have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company, taken
as a whole, such resolution may, however, have a material effect on the results
of operations or cash flows in any future period, depending on the level of
income for such period.
Securitization
Transactions
The
Company has securitized loans and securities in a securitization financing
transaction by transferring financial assets to a wholly owned trust, and the
trust issues non-recourse bonds pursuant to an indenture. Generally,
the Company retains some form of control over the transferred assets, and/or the
trust is not deemed to be a qualified special purpose entity. In
instances where the trust is deemed not to be a qualified special purpose
entity, the trust is included in the consolidated financial statements of the
Company. A transfer of financial assets in which the Company
surrenders control over those assets is accounted for as a sale to the extent
that consideration other than beneficial interests in the transferred assets is
received in exchange. For accounting and tax purposes, the loans and
securities financed through the issuance of bonds in a securitization financing
transaction are treated as assets of the Company, and the associated bonds
issued are treated as debt of the Company as securitization
financing. The Company may retain certain of the bonds issued by the
trust, and the Company generally will transfer collateral in excess of the bonds
issued. This excess is typically referred to as
over-collateralization. Each securitization trust generally provides
the Company the right to redeem, at its option, the remaining outstanding bonds
prior to their maturity date.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51.” SFAS
160 addresses reporting requirements in the financial statements of
non-controlling interests to their equity share of subsidiary
investments. SFAS 160 applies to reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the potential
impact on adoption of SFAS 160.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” SFAS 159 permits entities to choose
to measure many financial instruments, and certain other items, at fair
value. SFAS 159 applies to reporting periods beginning after November
15, 2007. The Company does not expected the adoption of SFAS 159 in
the first quarter of 2008 to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements”, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007 and all interim periods within
those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted provided that
the reporting
F-13
entity
has not yet issued interim or annual financial statements for that fiscal
year. The Company does not expected the adoption of SFAS 157 in the
first quarter of 2008 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
On
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attributes for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. The Company’s adoption of FIN 48 did not
have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
On
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of
Financial Assets — An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” This Statement
amends FASB Statement No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”, with respect to the
accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities.
This Statement requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or
servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial
asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations and to
initially measure those servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair
value, if practicable. The Company elected the option to measure its
servicing rights at fair value at each reporting date with changes in fair value
recorded in its earnings. The Company’s adoption of SFAS 156 did not
have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141-R, “Business Combinations” (SFAS No.
141-R) which revised SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (SFAS No.
141). This pronouncement is effective as of January 1,
2009. Under SFAS No. 141, organizations utilized the announcement
date as the measurement date for the purchase price of the acquired
entity. SFAS No. 141-R requires measurement at the date the acquirer
obtains control of the acquiree, generally referred to as the acquisition
date. SFAS No. 141-R will have a significant impact on the accounting
for transaction costs, restructuring costs as well as the initial recognition of
contingent assets and liabilities assumed during a business
combination. Under SFAS No. 141-R, adjustments to the acquired
entity’s deferred tax assets and uncertain tax position balances occurring
outside the measurement period are recorded as a component of the income tax
expense, rather than goodwill. As the provisions of SFAS No. 141-R
are applied prospectively, the impact cannot be determined until the
transactions occur. The Company is currently evaluating the impact,
if any, that SFAS 141-R may have on the Company’s financial
statements.
NOTE
3 – SECURITIZED MORTGAGE LOANS, NET
The
following table summarizes the components of securitized mortgage loans as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Securitized
mortgage loans:
|
||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 185,998 | $ | 225,463 | ||||
Single-family
|
86,088 | 116,060 | ||||||
272,086 | 341,523 | |||||||
Funds
held by trustees, including funds held for defeasance
|
7,225 | 7,351 | ||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
1,940 | 2,380 | ||||||
Unamortized
discounts and premiums, net
|
(67 | ) | (455 | ) | ||||
Loans,
at amortized cost
|
281,184 | 350,799 | ||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(2,721 | ) | (4,495 | ) | ||||
$ | 278,463 | $ | 346,304 |
All of
the securitized mortgage loans are encumbered by securitization financing bonds
(see Note 7).
F-14
Commercial
mortgage loans were originated principally in 1996 and 1997 and are
collateralized by first deeds of trust on income producing
properties. Approximately 88% of commercial mortgage loans are
secured by multifamily properties and approximately 12% by office, health-care,
hospital, retail, warehouse and mixed-used properties. There were no
delinquent commercial mortgage loans as of December 31, 2007.
Single-family
mortgage loans are secured by first deeds of trust on residential real estate
and were originated principally from 1992 to 1997. Single-family
mortgage loans includes $403 of loans in foreclosure and $1,940 of loans more
than 90 days delinquent, on which the Company continues to accrue
interest.
NOTE
4 - ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The
allowance for loan losses is included in securitized mortgage loans, net in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The following table
summarizes the aggregate activity for the allowance for loan losses for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Allowance
at beginning of year
|
$ | 4,495 | $ | 19,035 | $ | 28,014 | ||||||
(Recapture
of) provision for loan losses
|
(1,281 | ) | (15 | ) | 5,780 | |||||||
Credit
losses, net of recoveries
|
(493 | ) | (4,172 | ) | (3,450 | ) | ||||||
Loans
sold/transferred
|
– | (10,353 | ) | (11,309 | ) | |||||||
Allowance
at end of year
|
$ | 2,721 | $ | 4,495 | $ | 19,035 |
The loans
sold/transferred amount of $10,353 in 2006 represents the allowance associated
with the loans that were derecognized in connection with the initial formation
of a joint venture (see Note 10). The transfers of $11,309 in 2005
relate to the sale of the Company’s interest in three securitization trusts and
the related loans, primarily manufactured housing loans.
The
following table presents certain information on impaired securitized commercial
mortgage loans.
Investment
in Impaired Loans
|
Reserves
on Impaired Loans
|
Investment
in Excess of Reserves
|
||||||||||
2005
|
$ | 54,558 | $ | 21,609 | $ | 32,949 | ||||||
2006
|
13,266 | 4,107 | 9,159 | |||||||||
2007
|
13,792 | 2,590 | 11,202 |
NOTE
5 – SECURITIES
The
following table summarizes the Company’s amortized cost basis and fair value of
securities, all of which are classified as available-for-sale, as of December
31, 2007 and 2006, and the related average effective interest rates at December
31, 2007 and 2006:
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||||
Value
|
Effective
Interest Rate
|
Value
|
Effective
Interest Rate
|
|||||||||||||
Securities,
available-for-sale at amortized cost:
|
||||||||||||||||
Agency
mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 7,410 | 9.03 | % | $ | 1,582 | 9.33 | % | ||||||||
Non-agency
mortgage-backed securities
|
7,684 | 9.41 | % | 9,780 | 6.88 | % | ||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
7,704 | 1,151 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
4,722 | 12.46 | % | – | ||||||||||||
27,520 | 12,513 | |||||||||||||||
Gross
unrealized gains
|
2,406 | 636 | ||||||||||||||
Gross
unrealized losses
|
(695 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Securities,
available-for-sale at fair value
|
$ | 29,231 | $ | 13,143 |
F-15
Investment
activity. During 2007, the Company purchased approximately
$9,233 of common and preferred stock of publicly traded REITs and a $6,743
agency mortgage-backed security. The Company sold $2,657 of equity
securities during 2007 generating a net gain of $826.
The
Company also purchased $5,000 of a senior unsecured convertible note issued by a
public REIT during 2007. The note carries interest at 11.75% and is
convertible at the option of the holder at the initial conversion rate of
92.7085 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the note beginning September 30,
2007 up until the maturity date at September 1, 2027. The notes can
be called by the issuer anytime beginning September 1, 2012 and the Company can
put the bond back to the issuer at its face amount anytime after that same
date. The conversion feature permits the security’s owner to convert
the bond to 463,543 shares of Anthracite Capital common stock. The
Company bifurcated the conversion feature from the debt security and recorded it
as a derivative asset at its fair value of $279 when the security was purchased
and recorded an equal amount of discount on the corporate debt
security. The derivative asset is recorded in other loans and
investments (see Note 6) on the balance sheet with changes in value being
recorded in other income.
Unrealized gain/loss on
securities. The increase in unrealized gains on securities
from 2006 to 2007 was primarily related to an increase in value in the Company’s
investment in publicly traded REIT equity securities. The increase in
unrealized losses was related to a decline in value of the Company’s fixed rate
mortgage securities primarily as a result of widening credit risk spreads during
the year.
NOTE
6 – OTHER LOANS AND INVESTMENTS
The
following table presents the components of other loans and investments at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Single-family
mortgage loans
|
$ | 2,486 | $ | 3,345 | ||||
Multifamily
and commercial mortgage loan participations
|
927 | 962 | ||||||
Unamortized
discounts on mortgage loans
|
(289 | ) | (378 | ) | ||||
Mortgage
loans, net
|
3,124 | 3,929 | ||||||
Delinquent
property tax receivable securities
|
2,127 | 2,802 | ||||||
Notes
receivable and other investments
|
1,523 | – | ||||||
Other
loans and investments
|
$ | 6,774 | $ | 6,731 |
Delinquent
property tax receivable securities are net of an unrealized gain of $0 and $41
at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These securities include
real estate owned of $289 and $575 at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively. On February 5, 2008, the Company announced that its
indirect subsidiary, GLS Capital, Inc., received $1,625 from Allegheny County,
Pennsylvania for the sale of substantially all of the remaining tax liens that
GLS Capital, Inc. previously owned in Allegheny County.
As
discussed in Note 5, the Company also purchased a senior unsecured convertible
note which included a conversion feature that the Company bifurcated from the
bond and recorded as a derivative asset at its fair value. The
derivative asset is included in notes receivable and other investments in the
above table at its fair value of $153 at December 31, 2007.
NOTE
7 – SECURITIZATION FINANCING
The
Company, through limited-purpose finance subsidiaries, has issued bonds pursuant
to indentures in the form of non-recourse securitization
financing. Each series of securitization financing may consist of
various classes of bonds, at either fixed or variable rates of interest and
having varying repayment terms. The Company, on occasion, may retain
bonds at issuance, or redeem bonds and hold such bonds outstanding for possible
future issuance. Payments received on securitized mortgage loans
collateralizing these bonds and any reinvestment income thereon is used to make
payments on the securitization financing bonds (see Note 3). The
obligations under the
F-16
securitization
financing bonds are payable solely from the cash flows generated by the
securitized mortgage loans and are otherwise non-recourse to the
Company. The stated maturity date for each class of bonds is
generally calculated based on the final scheduled payment date of the underlying
collateral pledged. The actual maturity of each class will be
directly affected by the rate of principal prepayments on the related
collateral. Each series is also subject to redemption at the
Company’s option according to specific terms of the respective
indentures. As a result, the actual maturity of any class of a series
of securitization financing is likely to occur earlier than its stated
maturity.
In 2005,
the Company redeemed one series of securitization financing bonds collateralized
by single-family mortgage loans, financing such redemption with cash and
repurchase agreement financing. Because the redeemed bonds are held
by a subsidiary of the Company that is distinct from the bond’s issuer, to which
the bonds are a liability, the bonds are eliminated in the consolidated
financial statements but remain legally outstanding. One of these
bonds with a par value of $36,119 was reissued during 2007 at a discount of $830
generating proceeds of $35,289. The discount on the reissuance of
this bond is being amortized into interest expense using the effective interest
method over the estimated life of the bond.
The
components of securitization financing along with certain other information at
December 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized as follows:
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||||
Bonds
Outstanding
|
Range
of
Interest
Rates
|
Bonds
Outstanding
|
Range
of
Interest
Rates
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed
rate classes
|
$ | 167,398 | 6.6% - 8.8 | % | $ | 206,478 | 6.6% - 8.8 | % | ||||||||
Variable
rate class
|
34,500 | 5.1 | % | - | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
1,186 | 1,428 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred
costs
|
(1,851 | ) | (2,848 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unamortized
net bond premium
|
3,152 | 6,506 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 204,385 | $ | 211,564 | |||||||||||||
Range
of stated maturities
|
2024-2027 | 2024-2027 | ||||||||||||||
Estimated
weighted average life
|
3.3
years
|
3.5
years
|
||||||||||||||
Number
of series
|
3
|
2 |
At
December 31, 2007, the weighted-average effective rate of the fixed rate
classes was 6.9%. The average effective rate of interest for
securitization financing was 7.2%, 8.1%, and 7.4%, for the years ended December
31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
NOTE
8 – REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
The
Company uses repurchase agreements, which are recourse to the Company, to
finance certain of its investments. The Company had repurchase
agreements of $4,612 and $95,978, at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The repurchase agreement matures monthly and has a rate
of 0.10% over one-month LIBOR (4.6% at December 31, 2007). The
amounts outstanding under the repurchase agreement are collateralized by
securitization financing bonds with a fair value of $42,975 at December 31,
2007, and which pay interest at a blended rate of one-month LIBOR plus
0.10%.
F-17
NOTE
9 – FAIR VALUE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
SFAS No.
107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” requires the
disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments. The
following table presents the recorded basis and estimated fair values of the
Company’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2007 and 2006:
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||||
Recorded
Basis
|
Fair
Value
|
Recorded
Basis
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Securitized
mortgage loans, net
|
$ | 278,463 | $ | 282,242 | $ | 346,304 | $ | 369,984 | ||||||||
Securities
|
29,231 | 29,231 | 13,143 | 13,143 | ||||||||||||
Other
loans and investments
|
6,774 | 7,407 | 6,731 | 7,507 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Securitization
financing
|
204,385 | 212,327 | 211,564 | 230,575 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
4,612 | 4,612 | 95,978 | 95,978 | ||||||||||||
Obligation
under payment agreement
|
16,796 | 15,473 | 16,299 | 16,541 |
Estimates
of fair value for securitized mortgage loans are determined by calculating the
present value of the projected cash flows of the instruments, using discount
rates, prepayment rate assumptions and credit loss assumptions based on
historical experience and estimated future activity, and using discount rates
commensurate with those the Company believes would be used by third
parties. Prepayment rate assumptions for each year are based in part
on the actual prepayment rates experienced for the prior six-month period and in
part on management’s estimate of future prepayment activity. The loss
assumptions utilized vary for each series of securitized mortgage loans,
depending on the collateral pledged. Estimates of fair value for
other investments are determined by calculating the present value of the
projected net cash flows, inclusive of the estimated cost to service these
investments. Estimates of fair value for securities are based
principally on market prices provided by certain dealers. Fair value
for securitization financing is determined based on estimated current market
rates for similar instruments. Since estimates of fair value for the
obligation under payment agreement are based on cash flows generated by certain
securitized mortgage loans, the discount rate, prepayment rate and credit loss
assumptions are consistent with those used to value the securitized mortgage
loans.
NOTE
10 – INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE
The
Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, holds a 49.875% interest in
Copperhead Ventures, LLC, a joint venture primarily between the Company and DBAH
Capital, LLC, an affiliate of Deutsche Bank, A.G.
In
connection with the formation and initial capitalization of the joint venture in
2006, the Company contributed its interests in a pool of securitized commercial
mortgage loans issued by a subsidiary of the Company, and additionally agreed
under a payment agreement (included in the consolidated financial statements as
“obligation under payment agreement”) to make payments to the joint venture
based on cash flows received by the Company from its interests in a second pool
of securitized commercial mortgage loans. The joint venture has a
termination date of April 16, 2009.
With
respect to the payment agreement, the Company has the right to repurchase the
payment agreement from the joint venture under certain circumstances at its then
fair value, and the Company has the right of first refusal should the joint
venture decide to sell the agreement in the future. The Company
recorded an investment in the joint venture and a liability, which is included
in obligation under payment agreement in the balance sheet, equal to the
estimated fair value of the estimated future cash flows of the trust when the
joint venture was formed.
The
Company accounts for its investment in the joint venture using the equity
method, under which it recognizes its proportionate share of the joint ventures
earnings or loss and changes in accumulated other comprehensive
income. The Company reported equity in the earnings of the joint
venture of $709 and $610 for the decrease in accumulated other comprehensive
income of the joint venture for the year ended December 31, 2007.
F-18
The
equity in earnings of the joint venture represents $1,156 for the Company’s
interest in the earnings of the joint venture reduced by approximately $447
related to the amortization of the difference between the fair value of the
assets contributed to the joint venture and the Company’s initial capital
interest per the financial statements of the venture.
The
following table presents the results of operations for the joint venture for the
year ended December 31, 2007 and the period ended December 31, 2006 and the
financial condition as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Condensed
Statement of Operations
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Interest
income
|
$ | 5,819 | $ | 1,611 | ||||
Interest
expense
|
– | – | ||||||
Impairment
|
– | (3,664 | ) | |||||
(Loss)
gain on derivative instruments
|
(3,275 | ) | 589 | |||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 2,318 | $ | (1,508 | ) |
Condensed
Balance Sheet
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 37,972 | $ | 73,219 | ||||
Total
liabilities
|
– | – | ||||||
Total
equity
|
$ | 37,972 | $ | 73,219 |
The joint
venture’s trading loss of $3,275 in 2007 is related to a decline in value of the
redemption right the joint venture has on a commercial securitization
trust. The redemption right was recorded as a derivative asset and is
recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in
earnings.
The
decline in the joint venture’s equity is related to a $36,530 distribution of
excess cash during 2007, which was agreed to by the members.
NOTE
11 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
The
following table reconciles the numerator and denominator for both the basic and
diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and
2005.
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Income
|
Weighted
Average Common Shares
|
Income
|
Weighted
Average Common Shares
|
Income
|
Weighted
Average Common Shares
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 8,899 | $ | 4,909 | $ | 9,585 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock charge
|
(4,010 | ) | (4,044 | ) | (5,347 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$ | 4,889 | 12,135,495 | $ | 865 | 12,140,452 | $ | 4,238 | 12,163,062 | |||||||||||||||
Net
income per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted
|
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
effect of dilutive stock options
|
– | 2,593 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 4,889 | 12,138,088 | $ | 865 | 12,140,452 | $ | 4,238 | 12,163,062 | ||||||||||||||||
F-19
Potentially
antidilutive securities excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per
share are as follows:
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Shares
issuable under stock option awards
|
92,407 | 70,000 | 35,000 | |||||||||
Convertible
preferred shares
|
4,221,539 | 4,256,237 | 5,628,737 |
NOTE
12 – PREFERRED AND COMMON STOCK
The
Company is authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of preferred
stock. For all series issued, dividends are cumulative from the date
of issue and are payable quarterly in arrears. The dividends are
equal, per share, to the greater of (i) the per quarter base rate of
$0.2375 for Series D, or (ii) the quarterly dividend declared on the
Company’s common stock. One share of Series D preferred stock is
convertible at any time at the option of the holder into one share of common
stock. The series is redeemable by the Company at any time, in whole
or in part, (i) at a rate of one share of preferred stock for one share of
common stock, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, provided that for 20 trading
days within any period of 30 consecutive trading days, the closing price of the
common stock equals or exceeds the issue price, or (ii) for cash at the
issue price, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends.
In the
event of liquidation, the holders of this series of preferred stock will be
entitled to receive out of the Company’s assets, prior to any such distribution
to the common shareholders, the issue price per share in cash, plus any accrued
and unpaid dividends. If the Company fails to pay dividends for two
consecutive quarters or if the Company fails to maintain consolidated
shareholders’ equity of at least 200% of the aggregate issue price of the Series
D preferred stock, then these shares automatically convert into a new series of
9.50% senior notes. The Company paid dividends of $0.95 per share of
Series D Preferred Stock for each of the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005.
The
following table presents the changes in the number of preferred and common
shares outstanding:
Shares
|
||||||||
Preferred
|
||||||||
Series
D
|
Common
|
|||||||
January
1, 2005
|
5,628,737 | 12,162,391 | ||||||
Granted
|
- | 1,000 | ||||||
December
31, 2005
|
5,628,737 | 12,163,391 | ||||||
Redeemed
|
(1,406,767 | ) | - | |||||
Converted
|
(431 | ) | 431 | |||||
Repurchased
|
- | (32,560 | ) | |||||
December
31, 2006
|
4,221,539 | 12,131,262 | ||||||
Shares
issued for stock option exercise
|
- | 5,000 | ||||||
December
31, 2007
|
4,221,539 | 12,136,262 |
In 2006,
the Company redeemed 1,406,767 shares of its Series D Preferred
Stock. In addition, certain Series D Preferred Stock shareholders
elected to convert 431 shares of Series D Preferred Stock to common shares
rather than have their shares redeemed. The Company also repurchased
32,560 shares of common stock in 2006, under a stock repurchase plan authorized
by its Board of Directors in 2005. Any future repurchases of common
stock will be made at times and in amounts as deemed appropriate by the Company,
and the plan may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
Subsequent
to December 31, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of
$0.10 per common share to shareholders of record on February 15, 2008, which
will be paid on February 29, 2008.
F-20
Stock
Incentive Plan
Pursuant
to the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as approved by the shareholders at
the Company’s 2005 annual shareholders’ meeting (the Stock Incentive Plan), The
Company may grant to eligible officers, directors and employees stock options,
stock appreciation rights (SARs) and restricted stock awards. An
aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of common stock may be granted pursuant to the
Stock Incentive Plan. The Company may also grant dividend equivalent
rights (DERs) in connection with the grant of options or SARs.
On
January 3, 2007, the Company granted 82,000 SARs to certain of its employees and
officers under the Stock Incentive Plan. The SARs vest over four
years in equal annual installments, expire on December 31, 2013 and have an
exercise price of $7.06 per share, which was the market price of the stock on
the grant date. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the
SARs granted was $2.71.
On May
25, 2007, the Company granted options to the members of its Board of Directors
under the Stock Incentive Plan to acquire an aggregate of 25,000 shares of
common stock, which had a grant-date fair value per option of approximately
$1.69, for which the Company recorded an expense of $42. The options
were granted fully vested with an exercise price of $9.02 per share, which
represents 110% of the closing stock price on the grant date, and
with an expiration date of May 25, 2012.
The fair
value of each SAR or option award is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the
table below. Expected volatilities are based on the historical
volatility of the Company’s stock and other factors. The Company uses
historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the
valuation model. SARs are assumed to be exercised at the midpoint
between the later of their vesting date and the current reporting date and the
expiration date. The risk-free rate for periods within the
contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant.
As
required by SFAS 123(R), stock options, which are settleable only in shares of
common stock, have been treated as equity awards, with their fair value measured
at the grant date, and SARs, which are settleable in cash, have been treated as
liability awards, with their fair value measured at the grant date and
remeasured at the end of each reporting period.
The
following table describes the weighted average of assumptions used for
calculating the fair value of SARs outstanding at December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005.
SARs
Fair Value
|
|||
December
31,
|
|||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
15.0%-20.0%
|
17.2%-22.9%
|
14.6%-17.8%
|
Weighted-average
volatility
|
16.2%
|
19.4%
|
16.1%
|
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
Expected
term (in months)
|
49
|
45
|
35
|
Weighted-average
risk-free rate
|
3.5%
|
4.7%
|
4.7%
|
Range
of risk-free rates
|
3.3%-3.6%
|
4.7%
|
4.6%-4.7%
|
F-21
The
following table presents a summary of the SAR activity for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Year
Ended
|
||||||||
December
31, 2007
|
||||||||
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||
SARs
outstanding at beginning of period
|
203,297 | $ | 7.36 | |||||
SARs
granted
|
82,500 | 7.06 | ||||||
SARs
forfeited or redeemed
|
(7,651 | ) | 7.25 | |||||
SARs
exercised
|
– | – | ||||||
SARs
outstanding at end of period
|
278,146 | $ | 7.27 | |||||
SARs
vested and exercisable
|
78,249 | $ | 7.53 |
The
weighted average remaining contractual term on the SARs shares outstanding and
exercisable is 49 months and 51 months, respectively. The intrinsic
value at December 31, 2007 of SARs shares outstanding and exercisable is $445
and $105, respectively.
The
following table presents a summary of the option activity for the Stock
Incentive Plan:
Year
Ended
|
||||||||
December
31, 2007
|
||||||||
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||
Options
outstanding at beginning of period
|
75,000 | $ | 7.98 | |||||
Options
granted
|
25,000 | 9.02 | ||||||
Options
forfeited or redeemed
|
– | – | ||||||
Options
exercised
|
(5,000 | ) | 7.43 | |||||
Options
outstanding at end of period
|
95,000 | $ | 8.28 | |||||
Options
vested and exercisable
|
95,000 | $ | 8.28 |
The Company
issued 5,000 shares of common stock during 2007 for the exercise of stock
options, which had an exercise price of $7.43 per share, by one of
its directors.
The
Company incurred compensation expense of $306, $244 and $0 for SARs and options
related to the Stock Incentive Plan during 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The total compensation cost related to non-vested
awards was $407 at December 31, 2007 and will be recognized as the awards
vest. The weighted average period over which the total compensation
cost at December 31, 2007 is expected to be recognized is 49
months.
F-22
Employee
Savings Plan
The
Company provides an Employee Savings Plan under Section 401(k) of the
Code. The Employee Savings Plan allows eligible employees to defer up
to 25% of their income on a pretax basis. The Company matches the
employees’ contribution, up to 6% of the employees’ eligible
compensation. The Company may also make discretionary contributions
based on the profitability of the Company. The total expense related
to the Company’s matching and discretionary contributions in 2007, 2006, and
2005 was $62, $78 and $94, respectively. The Company does not provide
post employment or post retirement benefits to its employees.
NOTE
14 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As of
December 31, 2007, the Company is obligated under non-cancelable operating
leases with expiration dates through in May 2008. Required rental
payments through that date are $60. The Company has no other
operating lease obligations beyond May 2008. Rent and lease expense
under this lease and other leases which expired in previous years was $143,
$136, and $186, respectively in 2007, 2006, and 2005.
NOTE
15 – LITIGATION
One of
the Company’s subsidiaries, GLS Capital, Inc. (GLS), and the County of
Allegheny, Pennsylvania (Allegheny County), are defendants in a class action
lawsuit filed in 1997 in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County,
Pennsylvania (the Court of Common Pleas). Plaintiffs allege that GLS
illegally charged the taxpayers of Allegheny County certain attorney fees, costs
and expenses and interest, in the collection of delinquent property tax
receivables owned by GLS which were purchased from Allegheny
County. In 2007, the Court of Common Pleas stayed this action
pending the outcome of other litigation before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in
which GLS is not directly involved but has filed an Amicus brief in support of
the defendants. Several of the allegations in that lawsuit are similar to
those being made against GLS in this litigation. Plaintiffs have not
enumerated its damages in this matter, and the Company believes that the
ultimate outcome of this litigation will not have a material impact on its
financial condition, but may have a material impact on its reported results for
the particular period presented.
Dynex
Capital, Inc. and Dynex Commercial, Inc. (DCI), a former affiliate of the
Company and now known as DCI Commercial, Inc., are appellees (or respondents) in
the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Judicial District of Texas at Dallas, related
to the matter of Basic Capital Management et al (collectively, BCM or the
Plaintiffs) versus Dynex Commercial, Inc. et al. The Court of Appeals
heard oral arguments in this matter in April 2006. The appeal sought
to overturn the trial court’s judgment in our and DCI’s favor which denied
recovery to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs sought a reversal of the trial
court’s judgment, and sought rendition of judgment against us for alleged breach
of loan agreements for tenant improvements in the amount of $253.
They also sought reversal of the trial court’s judgment and rendition of
judgment against DCI in favor of BCM under two mutually exclusive damage models,
for $2,200 and $25,600, respectively, related to the alleged breach by DCI of a
$160,000 “master” loan commitment. Plaintiffs also sought reversal
and rendition of a judgment in their favor for attorneys’ fees in the amount of
$2,100. Alternatively, Plaintiffs sought a new trial. On
February 22, 2008, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Company and DCI,
upholding the trial court’s judgment. It is possible the Plaintiffs
may seek to further appeal the ruling of the Court of Appeals. Even
if Plaintiffs were to be successful on appeal, DCI is a former affiliate of the
Company, and the Company believes that it would have no obligation for amounts,
if any, awarded to the Plaintiffs as a result of the actions of
DCI.
F-23
The
Company and MERIT Securities Corporation, a subsidiary, are defendants in a
putative class action complaint alleging violations of the federal securities
laws in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
(District Court) by the Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund
(Teamsters). The complaint was filed on February 7, 2005, and
purports to be a class action on behalf of purchasers between February 2000 and
May 2004 of MERIT Series 12 and MERIT Series 13 securitization financing bonds
(the Bonds), which are collateralized by manufactured housing
loans. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and alleges,
among other things, misrepresentations in connection with the issuance of and
subsequent reporting on the Bonds. The complaint initially named the
Company’s former president and its current Chief Operating Officer as
defendants. On February 10, 2006, the District Court dismissed
the claims against the Company’s former president and its current Chief
Operating Officer, but did not dismiss the claims against the Company or
MERIT. The Company and MERIT petitioned for an interlocutory appeal
with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Second
Circuit). The Second Circuit granted the Company’s petition on
September 15, 2006 and heard oral argument on the appeal on January 30,
2008. The Company has evaluated the allegations made in the
complaint, believe them to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend
itself against them
Although
no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of the above
litigation, the Company believes the resolution of these lawsuits will not have
a material effect on its consolidated balance sheet but could materially affect
its consolidated results of operations in a given year or period.
NOTE
16 – SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
Years
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | 20,082 | $ | 40,932 | $ | 61,824 | ||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash activities:
|
||||||||||||
Formation
of joint venture with Deutsche Bank
|
$ | – | $ | 38,248 | $ | – | ||||||
Conversion
of preferred shares to common shares
|
$ | – | $ | 4 | $ | – |
NOTE
17 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
As
discussed in Note 15, the Company and DCI have been jointly named in litigation
regarding the activities of DCI while it was an operating subsidiary of an
affiliate of the Company. The Company and DCI entered into a
Litigation Cost Sharing Agreement whereby the parties set forth how the costs of
defending against litigation would be shared, and whereby the Company agreed to
fund all costs of such litigation, including DCI’s portion. DCI’s
cumulative portion of costs associated with litigation and funded by the Company
is $3,276 and is secured by the proceeds of any counterclaims that DCI may
receive in the litigation. DCI costs funded by the Company are loans
and bear simple interest at the rate of Prime plus 8.0% per annum. At
December 31, 2007, the total amount due the Company under the Litigation Cost
Sharing Agreement, including interest, was $5,662, which has been fully reserved
by the Company. DCI is currently wholly owned by ICD Holding,
Inc. An executive of the Company is the sole shareholder of ICD
Holding.
NOTE
18 – NON-CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
The
Company holds a 1% limited partnership interest in a partnership that owns a
low-income housing tax credit multifamily housing property located in
Texas. The Company has loaned the partnership $881, $170 of which was
advanced to the partnership during 2007. These advances and the
accrued interest thereon are due on demand. The Company, through a
subsidiary has made a first mortgage loan to the partnership secured by the
property, with a current unpaid principal balance of $1,556. Because
the Company does not have control or exercise significant influence over the
operations of this partnership, its investment in the partnership is accounted
for using the cost method.
F-24
NOTE
19 – SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
The
following tables present the Company’s unaudited selected quarterly results for
2007 and 2006.
Year
Ended December 31, 2007
|
First
Quarter
|
Second
Quarter
|
Third
Quarter
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
||||||||||||
Operating
results:
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
$ | 8,215 | $ | 8,023 | $ | 7,473 | $ | 7,067 | ||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
2,983 | 3,665 | 2,584 | 2,732 | ||||||||||||
Net
income
|
1,942 | 2,702 | 2,686 | 1,569 | ||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted net income per common share
|
0.08 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared per common share
|
– | – | – | – |
Year
Ended December 31, 2006
|
First
Quarter
|
Second
Quarter
|
Third
Quarter
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
||||||||||||
Operating
results:
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
$ | 14,766 | $ | 14,192 | $ | 13,000 | $ | 8,491 | ||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
2,407 | 2,543 | 3,102 | 3,050 | ||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
1,213 | 1,615 | (215 | ) | 2,297 | |||||||||||
Basic
and diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
0.01 | 0.05 | (0.10 | ) | 0.11 | |||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared per common share
|
– | – | – | – |
F-25