ECOLAB INC. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒ |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 |
|
OR
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 1-9328
ECOLAB INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
41-0231510 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
|
1 Ecolab Place, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 |
||
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 1-800-232-6522
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, $1.00 par value 2.625% Euro Notes due 2025 1.000% Euro Notes due 2024 |
|
New York Stock Exchange, Inc. New York Stock Exchange, Inc. New York Stock Exchange, Inc. |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☒ YES ☐ NO
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ YES ☒ NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ YES ☐ NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. ☒ YES ☐ NO
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☒ |
Accelerated filer ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company ☐ |
|
Emerging growth company ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ YES ☒ NO
Aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of registrant on June 30, 2017: $38,254,640,512 (see Item 12, under Part III hereof), based on a closing price of registrant’s Common Stock of $132.75 per share.
The number of shares of registrant’s Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding as of January 31, 2018: 288,858,441 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 3, 2018 and to be filed within 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference into Part III.
ECOLAB INC.
FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
2
Except where the context otherwise requires, references in this Form 10-K to (i) “Ecolab,” “Company,” “we” and “our” are to Ecolab Inc. and its subsidiaries, collectively; (ii) “Nalco”, “Nalco Company” and “Nalco Champion” are to Nalco Company LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company; (iii) “Nalco transaction” are to the merger of Ecolab and Nalco Holding Company completed in December 2011; and (iv) “Champion transaction” are to our acquisition of privately held Champion Technologies and its related company Corsicana Technologies in April 2013.
General Development of Business.
Ecolab was incorporated as a Delaware corporation in 1924. Our fiscal year is the calendar year ending December 31. International subsidiaries are included in the financial statements on the basis of their U.S. GAAP (accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America) November 30 fiscal year-ends to facilitate the timely inclusion of such entities in our consolidated financial reporting.
In 2017, we continued to invest in and build our business through various acquisitions that complement our strategic vision. Most notably, we completed the acquisition of Laboratoires Anios (“Anios”), a leading European manufacturer and marketer of hygiene and disinfection products for the healthcare, food service, and food and beverage processing industries in February 2017. In November 2017, we completed the sale of our Equipment Care division which had annualized net sales of approximately $180 million. See Part II, Item 8, Note 4 of this Form 10-K for additional information about the acquisitions and divestitures of the Company.
Financial Information About Operating Segments and Geographic Areas.
The financial information about reportable segments appearing under the heading “Operating Segments and Geographic Information” is incorporated by reference from Part II, Item 8, Note 17 of this Form 10-K.
Narrative Description of Business.
General
With 2017 sales of $13.8 billion, we are the global leader in water, hygiene and energy technologies and services that protect people and vital resources. We deliver comprehensive programs, products and services to promote safe food, maintain clean environments, optimize water and energy use, and improve operational efficiencies for customers in the food, healthcare, energy, hospitality and industrial markets in more than 170 countries around the world. Our cleaning and sanitizing programs and products, and pest elimination services, support customers in the foodservice, food and beverage processing, hospitality, healthcare, government and education, retail, textile care and commercial facilities management sectors. Our products and technologies are also used in water treatment, pollution control, energy conservation, oil production and refining, steelmaking, papermaking, mining and other industrial processes. We provided equipment maintenance and repair services prior to disposal of our Equipment Care business in the fourth quarter of 2017.
We pursue a “Circle the Customer – Circle the Globe” strategy by providing an array of innovative programs, products and services designed to meet the specific operational and sustainability needs of our customers throughout the world. Through this strategy and our varied product and service mix, one customer may utilize the offerings of several of our operating segments.
The following description of our business is based upon our reportable segments as reported in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, which are located in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K. Nine of our ten operating segments (eleven prior to the sale of Equipment Care), have been aggregated into three reportable segments: Global Industrial, Global Institutional and Global Energy. Our two operating segments that are primarily fee-for-service have been combined into Other, and do not meet the quantitative criteria to be separately reported. We provide similar information for Other as compared to our three reportable segments as we consider the information regarding its underlying operating segments as useful in understanding our consolidated results.
3
Global Industrial
This reportable segment consists of the Water, Food & Beverage, Paper, Life Sciences and Textile Care operating segments, which provide water treatment and process applications, and cleaning and sanitizing solutions, primarily to large industrial customers within the manufacturing, food and beverage processing, chemical, mining and primary metals, power generation, pulp and paper, pharmaceutical and commercial laundry industries. The underlying operating segments exhibit similar manufacturing processes, distribution methods and economic characteristics. Descriptions of the five operating segments which comprise our Global Industrial reportable segment follow below.
Water
Water serves customers across industrial and institutional markets, with the exception of the pulp and paper industry which is serviced by Paper and the energy industries which are served by Energy. Within Water, our institutional clients include commercial buildings, hospitals, universities and hotels. Light industry markets include food and beverage, manufacturing and transportation. Heavy industries served include power, mining, chemicals and primary metals.
Water provides water treatment products and water technologies programs for cooling water, waste water, boiler water and process water applications. Our cooling water treatment programs are designed to control the main problems associated with cooling water systems — corrosion, scale and microbial fouling and contamination — in open recirculating, once-through and closed systems. Our wastewater products and programs focus on improving overall plant economics, addressing compliance issues, optimizing equipment efficiency and improving operator capabilities and effectiveness. We provide integrated chemical solutions, process improvements and mechanical component modifications to optimize boiler performance and control corrosion and scale build-up. Our programs assist in the use of water for plant processes by optimizing the performance of treatment chemicals and equipment in order to minimize costs and maximize return on investment.
Our offerings include specialty products such as scale and corrosion inhibitors, antifoulants, pre-treatment solutions, membrane treatments, coagulants and flocculants, and anti-foams, as well as our 3D TRASARTM technology, which combines chemistry, remote services and monitoring and control. We provide products and programs for water treatment and process applications aimed at combining environmental benefits with economic gains for our customers. Typically, water savings, energy savings, maintenance and capital expenditure avoidance are among the primary sources of value to our customers, with product quality and production enhancement improvements also providing a key differentiating feature for many of our offerings. Our offerings are sold primarily by our corporate account and field sales employees.
We believe that we are one of the leading suppliers world-wide among suppliers of products and programs for chemical applications within the industrial water treatment industry.
Food & Beverage
Food & Beverage addresses cleaning and sanitation to facilitate the processing of products for human consumption. Food & Beverage provides detergents, cleaners, sanitizers, lubricants and animal health products, as well as cleaning systems, electronic dispensers and chemical injectors for the application of chemical products, primarily to dairy plants, dairy farms, breweries, soft-drink bottling plants, and meat, poultry and other food processors. Food & Beverage is also a leading developer and marketer of antimicrobial products used in direct contact with meat, poultry, seafood and produce during processing in order to reduce microbial contamination. Food & Beverage also designs, engineers and installs CIP (“clean‑in‑place”) process control systems and facility cleaning systems for its customer base. Products for use in processing facilities are sold primarily by our corporate account and field sales employees, while products for use on farms are sold through dealers and independent, third-party distributors.
We believe that we are one of the leading suppliers world-wide of cleaning and sanitizing products to the dairy plant, dairy farm, food, meat and poultry, and beverage/brewery processor industries.
4
Paper
Paper provides water and process applications for the pulp and paper industries, offering a comprehensive portfolio of programs that are used in all principal steps of the papermaking process and across all grades of paper, including graphic grades, board and packaging, and tissue and towel. Paper provides its customers similar types of products and programs for water treatment and wastewater treatment as those offered by Water. Also, Paper offers two specialty programs that differentiate its offerings from Water—pulp applications and paper applications. Our pulp applications maximize process efficiency and increase pulp cleanliness and brightness in bleaching operations, as well as predict and monitor scaling potential utilizing on-line monitoring to design effective treatment programs and avoid costly failures. Our paper process applications focus on improving our customers’ operational efficiency. Advanced sensing, monitoring and automation combine with innovative chemistries and detailed process knowledge to provide a broad range of customer solutions. Specialty products include flocculants, coagulants, dewatering aids, and digester yield enhances. Our offerings are sold primarily by our corporate account and field sales employees.
We believe that we are one of the leading suppliers world-wide of water treatment products and process aids to the pulp and papermaking industry.
Life Sciences
Effective in the first quarter of 2017, we established the Life Sciences operating segment. Life Science provides contamination control, cleaning and sanitizing solutions to personal care and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Life Sciences provides detergents, cleaners, sanitizers, disinfectant, as well as cleaning systems, electronic dispensers and chemical injectors for the application of chemical products. Additionally, sterile alcohols, sterile biocides, residue removal and dilution solutions, surface wipes, dispensing equipment and aerosol sprays are primarily sold for application within clean room environments. Products and programs are sold primarily through field sales personnel and corporate account personnel, and to a lesser extent through distributors.
Life Sciences is comprised of customers and accounts previously included in our Food & Beverage and Healthcare operating segments, which were related to manufacturing in the following industries: pharmaceutical, animal health and medicine, biologic products, cosmetics and medical device. Our tailored, comprehensive solutions and technical know-how focus on ensuring product quality and safety while improving operational efficiency in customers’ cleaning, sanitation and disinfection processes.
Textile Care
Textile Care provides products and services that manage the entire wash process through custom designed programs, premium products, dispensing equipment, water and energy management, and real time data management for large scale, complex commercial laundry operations including uniform rental, hospitality, linen rental and healthcare laundries. Textile Care’s programs are designed to meet our customers’ needs for exceptional cleaning, while extending the useful life of linen and reducing our customers’ overall operating costs. Products and programs are marketed primarily through field sales employees and, to a lesser extent, through distributors.
We believe that we are one of the leading suppliers world-wide in the laundry markets in which we compete.
Global Institutional
This reportable segment consists of the Institutional, Specialty and Healthcare operating segments, which provide specialized cleaning and sanitizing products to the foodservice, hospitality, lodging, healthcare, government, education and retail industries. The underlying operating segments exhibit similar manufacturing processes, distribution methods and economic characteristics. Descriptions of the three operating segments which comprise our Global Institutional reportable segment follow below.
Institutional
Institutional sells specialized cleaners and sanitizers for washing dishes, glassware, flatware, foodservice utensils and kitchen equipment (“warewashing”), plus specialized cleaners for various applications throughout food service operations; for on-premise laundries (typically used by hotel and healthcare customers); and for general housekeeping functions, as well as food safety products and equipment, water filters, dishwasher racks and related kitchen sundries to the foodservice, lodging, educational and healthcare industries. Institutional also provides pool and spa treatment programs for hospitality and other commercial customers, as well as a broad range of janitorial cleaning and floor care products and programs to customers in hospitality, healthcare and commercial facilities. Institutional develops various chemical dispensing systems which are used by our customers to efficiently and safely dispense our cleaners and sanitizers. In addition, Institutional markets a lease program comprised of energy-efficient dishwashing machines, detergents, rinse additives and sanitizers, including full machine maintenance. Through our EcoSure Food Safety Management business, Institutional also provides customized on-site evaluations, training and quality assurance services to foodservice operations.
Institutional sells its products and programs primarily through its field sales and corporate account sales personnel. Corporate account sales personnel establish relationships and negotiate contracts with larger multi-unit or “chain” customers. We also utilize independent, third-party foodservice, broad-line and janitorial distributors to provide logistics to end customers for accounts that prefer to purchase through these distributors. Many of these distributors also participate in marketing our product and service offerings to the end customers. Through our field sales personnel, we generally provide the same customer support to end-use customers supplied by these distributors as we do to direct customers.
We believe that we are one of the leading global suppliers of warewashing and laundry products and programs to the food service, hospitality and lodging markets.
5
Specialty
Specialty supplies cleaning and sanitizing chemical products and related items primarily to regional, national and international quick service restaurant (“QSR”) chains and food retailers (i.e., supermarkets and grocery stores). Its products include specialty and general purpose hard surface cleaners, degreasers, sanitizers, polishes, hand care products and assorted cleaning tools and equipment which are primarily sold under the “Ecolab” and “Kay” brand names. Specialty’s cleaning and sanitation programs are customized to meet the needs of the market segments it serves and are designed to provide highly effective cleaning performance, promote food safety, reduce labor costs and enhance user and guest safety. A number of dispensing options are available for products in the core product range. Specialty supports its product sales with training programs and technical support designed to meet the special needs of its customers.
Both Specialty’s QSR business and its food retail business utilize a corporate account sales force which manages relationships with customers at the corporate headquarters and regional office levels (and, in the QSR market segment, at the franchisee level) and a field sales force which provides program support at the individual restaurant or store level. QSR customers are primarily supplied through third party distributors while most food retail customers utilize their own distribution networks. While Specialty’s customer base has broadened over the years, Specialty’s business remains largely dependent upon a limited number of major QSR chains and franchisees and large food retail customers.
We believe that Specialty is one of the leading suppliers of cleaning and sanitizing products to the global QSR market and a leading supplier of cleaning and sanitizing products to the global food retail market.
Healthcare
Healthcare provides infection prevention, surgical solutions and contamination control solutions to acute care hospitals, surgery centers, medical device Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEM”), and pharmaceutical and hospital clean room environments. Healthcare’s proprietary infection prevention and surgical solutions (hand hygiene, hard surface disinfection, instrument cleaning, patient drapes, equipment drapes and surgical fluid warming and cooling systems) are sold primarily under the "Ecolab", "Microtek" and “Anios” brand names to various departments within the acute care environment (Infection Control, Environmental Services, Central Sterile and Operating Room). Healthcare sells its products and programs primarily through field sales personnel and corporate account personnel but also sells through healthcare distributors.
We believe Healthcare is a leading supplier of infection prevention and surgical solutions in the United States and Europe.
Global Energy
This reportable segment, which operates primarily under the Nalco Champion name, consists of the Energy operating segment, which serves the process chemicals and water treatment needs of the global petroleum and petrochemical industries in both upstream and downstream applications.
Energy provides on-site, technology-driven solutions to the global drilling and completion, oil and gas production and refining and petrochemical industries. Our product portfolio includes: additives for drilling and well stimulation, corrosion inhibitors, oil and water separation, scale control, paraffin and asphaltene control, biocides, hydrate control, hydrogen sulfide removal, oil dispersants, foamers and anti-foamers, flow improvers, anti-foulants, crude desalting, monomer inhibitors, anti-oxidants, fuel and lubricant additives, and traditional water treatment.
The Energy operating segment operates under an upstream group composed primarily of our WellChem and Oil Field Chemicals businesses and a downstream refinery and petrochemical processing group. Our upstream group provides solutions to the oil and gas production sector, including crude oil and natural gas production, pipeline gathering/transmission systems, gas processing, heavy oil and bitumen upgrading and enhanced oil recovery. Upstream also supplies chemicals for the cementing, drilling, fracturing and acidizing phases of well drilling and stimulation. Our priority is to safely manage the critical challenges facing today’s oil and gas producers throughout the life cycle of their assets, with such an approach helping our customers minimize risk, achieve their production targets and maximize profitability. Our downstream group provides products and programs for process and water treatment applications specific to the petroleum refining and fuels industry, enabling our customers to profitably refine and upgrade hydrocarbons. Our heavy oil upgrading programs minimize operational costs and mitigate fouling, corrosion, foaming and the effects of heavy metals during the refining process. We also offer fuel additives, including corrosion inhibitors, to protect engine fuel systems and pre-market underground storage tanks and piping. Our customers include nearly all of the largest publicly traded oil companies, as well as national oil companies and large independent oil companies. Our Energy offerings are sold primarily by our corporate account and field sales employees and, to a lesser extent, through distributors, sales agents and joint ventures.
We believe Energy is one of the leading global providers of specialty chemicals to the upstream oil and gas industry, and downstream refineries and petrochemical operations.
6
Other
Other consists of the Pest Elimination and Equipment Care, prior to its sale in November 2017, operating segments. We provide pest elimination and kitchen repair and maintenance through our two operating units that are primarily fee-for-service businesses. In general, these businesses provide service which can augment or extend our product offerings to our business customers as a part of our “Circle the Customer” approach and, in particular, by enhancing our food safety capabilities.
Pest Elimination
Pest Elimination provides services designed to detect, eliminate and prevent pests, such as rodents and insects, in restaurants, food and beverage processors, educational and healthcare facilities, hotels, quick service restaurant and grocery operations and other institutional and commercial customers. The services of Pest Elimination are sold and performed by field sales and service personnel.
Pest Elimination continues to expand its geographic coverage. In addition to the United States, which constitutes the largest operation, we operate in various countries in Asia Pacific, Western Europe, Latin America and South Africa, with the largest operations in France, the United Kingdom, Greater China and Mexico.
We believe Pest Elimination is a leading supplier of pest elimination programs to the commercial, hospitality and institutional markets in the geographies it serves.
Equipment Care
Prior to its sale in November 2017, Equipment Care provided equipment repair, maintenance and preventive maintenance services for the commercial food service industry. Repair services were offered for in-warranty repair, acting as the manufacturer’s authorized service agent, as well as after-warranty repair. In addition, Equipment Care operated as a parts distributor to repair service companies and end-use customers. Operations were solely in the United States.
Additional Information
International Operations
We directly operate in approximately 100 countries outside of the United States through wholly-owned subsidiaries or, in some cases, through a joint venture with a local partner. In certain countries, selected products are sold by our export operations to distributors, agents or licensees, although the volume of those sales is not significant in terms of our overall revenues. In general, our businesses conducted outside the United States are similar to those conducted in the United States.
Our business operations outside the United States are subject to the usual risks of foreign operations, including possible changes in trade and foreign investment laws, international business laws and regulations, tax laws, currency exchange rates and economic and political conditions. The profitability of our International operations is generally lower than the profitability of our businesses in the United States, due to (i) the additional cost of operating in numerous and diverse foreign jurisdictions and regulations, (ii) higher costs of importing certain raw materials and finished goods in some regions, (iii) the smaller scale of international operations where certain operating locations are smaller in size, and (iv) the additional reliance on distributors and agents in certain countries which can negatively impact our margins. Proportionately larger investments in sales and technical support are also necessary in certain geographies in order to facilitate the growth of our international operations.
Competition
In general, the markets in which the businesses in our Global Industrial reportable segment compete are led by a few large companies, with the rest of the market served by smaller entities focusing on more limited geographic regions or a smaller subset of products and services. Our businesses in this segment compete on the basis of their demonstrated value, technical expertise, chemical formulations, customer support, detection equipment, monitoring capabilities, and dosing and metering equipment.
The businesses in our Global Institutional reportable segment and Other have two significant classes of competitors. First, we compete with a small number of large companies selling directly or through distributors on a national or international scale. Second, we have numerous smaller regional or local competitors which focus on more limited geographies, product lines and/or end-use customer segments. We compete principally by providing superior value, premium customer support and differentiated products to help our customers protect their brand reputation.
Our Global Energy reportable segment competes with a limited number of multinational companies, with the remainder of the market comprised of smaller, regional niche companies focused on limited geographic areas. We compete in this business on the basis of our product quality, technical expertise, chemical formulations, effective global supply chain, strong customer service and emphasis on safety and environmental leadership.
7
Sales
Products, systems and services are primarily marketed in domestic and international markets by Company-trained field sales personnel who also advise and assist our customers in the proper and efficient use of the products and systems in order to meet a full range of cleaning and sanitation, water treatment and process chemistry needs. Independent, third-party distributors and, to a lesser extent, sales agents, are utilized in several markets, as described in the segment descriptions found above.
Number of Employees
We had 48,400 employees as of December 31, 2017.
Customers and Classes of Products
We believe that our business is not materially dependent upon a single customer. Additionally, although we have a diverse customer base and no customer or distributor constitutes 10 percent or more of our 2017 consolidated revenues, we do have customers and independent, third-party distributors, the loss of which could have a material adverse effect on results of operations for the affected earnings periods; however, we consider it unlikely that such an event would have a material adverse impact on our financial position. No material part of our business is subject to renegotiation or termination at the election of a governmental unit.
We sold one class of products within the Global Institutional segment which comprised 10% or more of consolidated net sales in the last three years. Sales of warewashing products were approximately 11% of consolidated net sales in 2017 and 2016 and 10% of consolidated net sales in 2015.
Patents and Trademarks
We own and license a number of patents, trademarks and other intellectual property. While we have an active program to protect our intellectual property by filing for patents or trademarks and pursuing legal action, when appropriate, to prevent infringement, except for the items listed below, we do not believe that our overall business is materially dependent on any individual patent or trademark.
· |
Patents related to our TRASAR and 3D TRASAR technology, which are material to our Global Industrial reportable segment. U.S. and foreign patents protect aspects of our key TRASAR and 3D TRASAR technology until at least 2024. |
· |
Trademarks related to Ecolab, Nalco and 3D TRASAR, which collectively are material to all of our reportable segments. The Ecolab, Nalco and 3D TRASAR trademarks are registered or applied for in all of our key markets, and we anticipate maintaining them indefinitely. |
Seasonality
We experience variability in our quarterly operating results due to seasonal sales volume and business mix fluctuations in our operating segments. Part II, Item 8, Note 18, entitled “Quarterly Financial Data” of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
Investments in Equipment
We have no unusual working capital requirements. We have invested in the past, and will continue to invest in the future, in process control and monitoring equipment consisting primarily of systems used by customers to dispense our products as well as to monitor water systems. The investment in such equipment is discussed under the heading "Investing Activities" in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-K.
Manufacturing and Distribution
We manufacture most of our products and related equipment in Company-operated manufacturing facilities. Some products are also produced for us by third-party contract manufacturers. Other products and equipment are purchased from third-party suppliers. Additional information on product/equipment sourcing is found in the segment discussions above and additional information on our manufacturing facilities is located under Part I, Item 2. “Properties,” of this Form 10-K.
Deliveries to customers are made from our manufacturing plants and a network of distribution centers and third-party logistics service providers. We use common carriers, our own delivery vehicles, and distributors for transport. Additional information on our plant and distribution facilities is located under Part I, Item 2. “Properties,” of this Form 10-K.
Raw Materials
Raw materials purchased for use in manufacturing our products are inorganic chemicals, including alkalis, acids, biocides, phosphonates, phosphorous materials, silicates and salts; and organic chemicals, including acids, alcohols, amines, fatty acids, surfactants, solvents, monomers and polymers. Healthcare purchases plastic films and parts to manufacture medical devices that serve the surgical and infection prevention markets. Pesticides used by Pest Elimination are purchased as finished products under contract or purchase order from the producers or their distributors. We also purchase packaging materials for our manufactured products and components for our specialized cleaning equipment and systems. We purchase more than 10,000 raw materials, with the largest single raw material representing less than 2% of raw material purchases. Our raw materials, with the exception of a few specialized chemicals which we
8
manufacture, are generally purchased on an annual contract basis and are ordinarily available in adequate quantities from a diverse group of suppliers globally. When practical, global sourcing is used so that purchasing or production locations can be shifted to control product costs at globally competitive levels.
Research and Development
Our research and development program consists principally of developing and validating the performance of new products, processes, techniques and equipment, improving the efficiency of existing ones, improving service program content, evaluating the environmental compatibility of products and technical support. Key disciplines include analytical and formulation chemistry, microbiology, process and packaging engineering, remote monitoring engineering and product dispensing technology. Substantially all of our principal products have been developed by our research, development and engineering personnel.
We believe continued research and development activities are critical to maintaining our leadership position within the industry and will provide us with a competitive advantage as we seek additional business with new and existing customers.
Part II, Item 8, Note 14, entitled “Research and Development Expenditures” of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
Joint Ventures
Over time, we have entered into partnerships or joint ventures in order to meet local ownership requirements, to achieve quicker operational scale, to expand our ability to provide our customers a more fully integrated offering or to provide other benefits to our business or customers. During 2017, the impact on our consolidated net income of our joint ventures, in the aggregate, was less than three percent. The table below identifies our most significant consolidated and non-consolidated joint ventures, summarized by the primary purpose of the joint venture.
Local Ownership Requirements / Geographic Expansion |
||||||||
Joint Venture |
Location |
Segment |
||||||
Nalco Saudi Co. Ltd. |
Saudi Arabia |
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
||||||
AGS Champion LLP |
Kazakhstan |
Global Energy |
||||||
Nalco Angola Prestação de Serviços, Limitada |
Angola |
Global Energy |
||||||
RauanNalco LLP |
Kazakhstan |
Global Energy |
||||||
Nalco Champion EG Sarl |
Equatorial Guinea |
Global Energy |
||||||
Emirates National Chemical Company LLC |
United Arab Emirates |
Global Energy |
||||||
Malaysian Energy Chemical & Services Sdn. Bhd. |
Malaysia |
Global Energy |
||||||
Arpal Gulf, LLC |
United Arab Emirates |
Global Institutional |
||||||
Nalco Champion Dai-ichi India Private Limited |
India |
Global Energy |
||||||
Nalco Champion Ghana Limited |
Ghana |
Global Energy |
||||||
Operational Scale / Geographic Critical Mass |
||||||||
Joint Venture |
Location |
Segment |
||||||
Katayama Nalco Inc. |
Japan |
Global Industrial |
||||||
Technology / Expanded Product Offering / Manufacturing Capability |
||||||||
Joint Venture |
Location |
Segment |
||||||
Aquatech International, LLC |
United States |
Global Industrial |
||||||
Treated Water Outsourcing |
United States |
Global Industrial |
||||||
Derypol, S.A. |
Spain |
Global Industrial |
||||||
Century LLC |
United States |
Global Institutional |
||||||
CJSC Nalco Element JV |
Russia |
Global Energy |
||||||
Kogalym Chemicals Plant LLC |
Russia |
Global Energy |
||||||
Petrochem Performance Products |
Azerbaijan |
Global Energy |
||||||
HanSteel Nalco Water Treatment (Handan) Co., Limited |
China |
Global Industrial |
Additionally, we continue to be party to the Ecolab S.A. joint venture in Venezuela, which historically operated businesses in our Global Industrial and Global Institutional segments. This joint venture was included among the Venezuelan subsidiaries that we deconsolidated for U.S. GAAP purposes effective at the end of the fourth quarter of 2015, as further described within the MD&A and Part II, Item 8, Note 3 of this Form 10-K.
We will continue to evaluate the potential for partnerships and joint ventures that can assist us in increasing our geographic, technological and product reach.
9
Environmental and Regulatory Considerations
Our businesses are subject to various legislative enactments and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and public health. While we cooperate with governmental authorities and take commercially practicable measures to meet regulatory requirements and avoid or limit environmental effects, some risks are inherent in our businesses. Among the risks are costs associated with transporting and managing hazardous materials and waste disposal and plant site clean‑up, fines and penalties if we are found to be in violation of law, as well as modifications, disruptions or discontinuation of certain operations or types of operations including product recalls and reformulations. Similarly, the need for certain of our products and services is dependent upon or might be limited by governmental laws and regulations. Changes in such laws and regulations, including among others, air pollution regulations and regulations relating to oil and gas production (including those related to hydraulic fracturing), could impact the sales of some of our products or services. In addition to an increase in costs of manufacturing and delivering products, a change in production regulations or product regulations could result in interruptions to our business and potentially cause economic or consequential losses should we be unable to meet the demands of our customers for products.
Additionally, although we are not currently aware of any such circumstances, there can be no assurance that future legislation or enforcement policies will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Environmental and regulatory matters most significant to us are discussed below.
Ingredient Legislation: Various laws and regulations have been enacted by state, local and foreign jurisdictions pertaining to the sale of products which contain phosphorous, volatile organic compounds, or other ingredients that may impact human health or the environment. Under California Proposition 65, for example, label disclosures are required for certain products containing chemicals listed by California. Chemical management initiatives that promote pollution prevention through research and development of safer chemicals and safer chemical processes are being advanced by certain states, including California, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oregon and South Carolina. Environmentally preferable purchasing programs for cleaning products have been enacted in nine states to date, and in recent years have been considered by several other state legislatures. Cleaning product ingredient disclosure legislation has been introduced in the U.S. Congress in each of the past few years but has not passed, and several states are considering further regulations in this area. Last year, California passed the Cleaning Product Right to Know Act of 2017, which will require ingredient transparency on-line and on-label by 2020 and 2021, respectively. New York is in the process of drafting similar regulations with an expected passage in 2018. The U.S. Government is monitoring “green chemistry” initiatives through a variety of initiatives, including its “Design for the Environment” (“DfE”)/“Safer Choice” program. DfE/Safer Choice has three broad areas of work (recognition of safer products on a DfE/Safer Choice label, development of best practices for industrial processes and evaluation of safer chemicals), and we are involved in these to varying degrees. Our Global Institutional and Global Industrial cleaning products are subject to the regulations and may incur additional stay-in-market expenses associated with conducting the required alternatives analyses for chemicals of concern. To date, we generally have been able to comply with such legislative requirements by reformulation or labeling modifications. Such legislation has not had a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows to date.
TSCA: The nation’s primary chemicals management law, the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”), was updated for the first time in 40 years with the passage of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (“LCSA”) in 2016. The LCSA modernizes the original 1976 legislation, aiming to establish greater public confidence in the safety of chemical substances in commerce, improve the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) EPA’s capability and authority to regulate existing and new chemical substances, and prevent further state action or other notification programs like REACH (see below). For Ecolab, the new TSCA rules will mainly impact testing and submission costs for new chemical substances in the United States. In addition, the EPA likely will be more aggressively using the existing TSCA tools to manage chemicals of concern. We anticipate that compliance with new requirements under TSCA could be similar to the costs associated with REACH in the European Union, which is discussed below.
REACH: The European Union has enacted a regulatory framework for the Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (“REACH”). It established a new European Chemicals Agency (“ECHA”) in Helsinki, Finland, which is responsible for evaluating data to determine hazards and risks and to manage this program for authorizing chemicals for sale and distribution in Europe. We met the pre-registration requirements of REACH, the 2010 and 2013 registration deadlines, and are on track to meet the final registration deadlines and requirements in 2018. To help manage this program, we have been simplifying our product lines and working with chemical suppliers to comply with registration requirements. In addition, Korea, Taiwan and other countries are implementing similar requirements. Potential costs to us are not yet fully quantifiable, but are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows in any one reporting period or on our financial position.
GHS: In 2003, the United Nations adopted a standard on hazard communication and labeling of chemical products known as the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (“GHS”). GHS is designed to facilitate international trade and increase safe handling and use of hazardous chemicals through a worldwide system that classifies chemicals based on their intrinsic hazards and communicates information about those hazards through standardized product labels and safety data sheets (“SDSs”). Most countries in which we operate will adopt GHS-related legislation, and numerous countries already have done so. The primary cost of compliance revolves around reclassifying products and revising SDSs and product labels. We met the 2015 deadlines in the U.S. and European Union and are working toward a phased-in approach to mitigate the costs of GHS implementation in other countries (e.g., Thailand). Potential costs to us are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows in any one reporting period or on our financial position.
10
Pesticide and Biocide Legislation: Various international, federal and state environmental laws and regulations govern the manufacture and/or use of pesticides. We manufacture and sell certain disinfecting, sanitizing and material preservation products that kill or reduce microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, fungi) on hard environmental surfaces, in process fluids and on certain food products. Such products constitute “pesticides” or “antimicrobial pesticides” under the current definitions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”), as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, the principal federal statute governing the manufacture, labeling, handling and use of pesticides. We maintain several hundred product registrations with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). Registration entails the necessity to meet certain efficacy, toxicity and labeling requirements and to pay on-going registration fees. In addition, each state in which these products are sold requires registration and payment of a fee. In general, the states impose no substantive requirements different from those required by FIFRA. However, California and certain other states have adopted additional regulatory programs, and California imposes a tax on total pesticide sales in that state. While the cost of complying with rules as to pesticides has not had a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows to date, the costs and delays in receiving necessary approvals for these products continue to increase. Total fees paid to the EPA and the states to obtain or maintain pesticide registrations are not expected to significantly affect our consolidated results of operations or cash flows in any one reporting period or our financial position.
In Europe, the Biocidal Product Directive and the more recent Biocidal Products Regulation established a program to evaluate and authorize marketing of biocidal active substances and products. We are working with suppliers and industry groups to manage these requirements and have met the first relevant deadline of the program by the timely submission of dossiers for active substances. Anticipated registration costs, which will be incurred through the multi-year phase-in period, will be significant; however, these costs are not expected to significantly affect our consolidated results of operations or cash flows in any one reporting period or our financial position. The same is true for emerging biocide regulations in Asia.
In addition, Pest Elimination applies restricted-use pesticides that it generally purchases from third parties. That business must comply with certain standards pertaining to the use of such pesticides and to the licensing of employees who apply such pesticides. Such regulations are enforced primarily by the states or local jurisdictions in conformity with federal regulations. We have not experienced material difficulties in complying with these requirements.
FDA Antimicrobial Product Requirements: Various laws and regulations have been enacted by federal, state, local and foreign jurisdictions regulating certain products manufactured and sold by us for controlling microbial growth on humans, animals and foods. In the United States, these requirements generally are administered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"). However, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and EPA also may share in regulatory jurisdiction of antimicrobials applied to food. The FDA codifies regulations for these product categories in order to ensure product quality, safety and effectiveness. The FDA also has been expanding requirements applicable to such products, including proposing regulations for over-the-counter antiseptic drug products, which may impose additional requirements associated with antimicrobial hand care products and associated costs when finalized by the FDA. FDA regulations associated with the Food Safety Modernization Act may impose additional requirements related to safety product lines. To date, such requirements have not had a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Medical Device and Drug Product Requirements: As a manufacturer, distributor and marketer of medical devices and human drugs, we also are subject to regulation by the FDA and corresponding regulatory agencies of the state, local and foreign governments in which we sell our products. These regulations govern the development, testing, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution and marketing of medical devices and medicinal products. We also are required to register with the FDA as a medical device and drug manufacturer, comply with post-market reporting (e.g., Adverse Event Reporting, MDR and Recall) requirements, and to comply with the FDA’s current Good Manufacturing Practices and Quality System Regulations which require that we have a quality system for the design and production of our products intended for commercial distribution in the United States and satisfy recordkeeping requirements with respect to our manufacturing, testing and control activities. Countries in the European Union require that certain products being sold within their jurisdictions obtain a “CE mark”, an international symbol of adherence to quality assurance standards, and be manufactured in compliance with certain requirements (e.g., Medical Device Directive 93/42/EE and ISO 13485). We have CE mark approval to sell various medical device and medicinal products in Europe. Our other international non-European operations also are subject to government regulation and country-specific rules and regulations. Regulators at the federal, state and local level have imposed, are currently considering and are expected to continue to impose regulations on medical devices and drug products. No prediction can be made of the potential effect of any such future regulations, and there can be no assurance that future legislation or regulations will not increase the costs of our products or prohibit the sale or use of certain products.
Equipment: Ecolab’s products are dispensed by equipment that is subject to state and local regulatory requirements, as well as being subject to UL, NSF, and other approval requirements. We have both dedicated manufacturing facilities and third-party production of our equipment. We are developing processes to monitor and manage changing regulatory regimes and assist with equipment systems compliance. To date, such requirements have not had a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Other Environmental Legislation: Our manufacturing plants are subject to federal, state, local or foreign jurisdiction laws and regulations relating to discharge of hazardous substances into the environment and to the transportation, handling and disposal of such substances. The primary federal statutes that apply to our activities in the United States are the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. We are also subject to the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, which imposes certain reporting requirements as to emissions of hazardous substances into
11
the air, land and water. The products we produce and distribute into Europe are also subject to directives governing electrical waste (WEEE Directive 2012/19/EU) and restrictive substances (RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU). Similar legal requirements apply to Ecolab’s facilities globally. We make capital investments and expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations, to promote employee safety and to carry out our announced environmental sustainability principles. To date, such expenditures have not had a significant adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Our capital expenditures for environmental, health and safety projects worldwide were approximately $70 million in 2017 and $60 million in 2016. Approximately $43 million has been budgeted globally for projects in 2018. The decrease in 2018 from 2017 is due to the completion of several large safety projects at our manufacturing facilities.
Climate Change: Various laws and regulations pertaining to climate change have been implemented or are being considered for implementation at the international, national, regional and state levels, particularly as they relate to the reduction of greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. None of these laws and regulations directly apply to Ecolab at the present time; however, as a matter of corporate policy, we support a balanced approach to reducing GHG emissions while sustaining economic growth. We are committed to reducing our carbon footprint and have made significant strides in recent years. In 2014, we received a Climate Leadership Award, co-sponsored by EPA, recognizing Ecolab for achieving an absolute global greenhouse gas emissions reduction of more than 12.5 percent (22.4 percent intensity reduction).
Our current global sustainability targets were established in 2016. They include a 25 percent reduction in water withdrawals and a 10 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. In addition to our internal sustainability performance, we partner with customers at more than one million customer locations around the world to reduce energy and greenhouse gas emissions through our high-efficiency solutions in cleaning and sanitation, water, paper and energy services. We also introduced a customer impact goal for the first time. By partnering with our customers to help them do more with less through the use of our solutions, we aim to help our customers conserve more than 300 billion gallons of water annually by 2030.
Environmental Remediation and Proceedings: Along with numerous other potentially responsible parties (“PRP”), we are currently involved with waste disposal site clean‑up activities imposed by the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) or state equivalents at 35 sites in the United States. Additionally, we have similar liability at seven sites outside the United States. In general, under CERCLA, we and each other PRP that actually contributed hazardous substances to a Superfund site are jointly and severally liable for the costs associated with cleaning up the site. Customarily, the PRPs will work with the EPA to agree and implement a plan for site remediation.
Based on an analysis of our experience with such environmental proceedings, our estimated share of all hazardous materials deposited on the sites referred to in the preceding paragraph, and our estimate of the contribution to be made by other PRPs which we believe have the financial ability to pay their shares, we have accrued our best estimate of our probable future costs relating to such known sites. In establishing accruals, potential insurance reimbursements are not included. The accrual is not discounted. It is not feasible to predict when the amounts accrued will be paid due to the uncertainties inherent in the environmental remediation and associated regulatory processes.
We have also been named as a defendant in lawsuits where our products have not caused injuries, but the claimants wish to be monitored for potential future injuries. We cannot predict with certainty the outcome of any such tort claims or the involvement we or our products might have in such matters in the future, and there can be no assurance that the discovery of previously unknown conditions will not require significant expenditures. In each of these chemical exposure cases, our insurance carriers have accepted the claims on our behalf (with or without reservation) and our financial exposure should be limited to the amount of our deductible; however, we cannot predict the number of claims that we may have to defend in the future and we may not be able to continue to maintain such insurance.
We have also been named as a defendant in a number of lawsuits alleging personal injury due to exposure to hazardous substances, including multi-party lawsuits alleging personal injury in connection with our products and services. While we do not believe that any of these suits will be material to us based upon present information, there can be no assurance that these environmental matters could not have, either individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Our worldwide net expenditures for contamination remediation were approximately $6 million in 2017 and $9 million in 2016. Our worldwide accruals at December 31, 2017 for probable future remediation expenditures, excluding potential insurance reimbursements, totaled approximately $21 million. We review our exposure for contamination remediation costs periodically and our accruals are adjusted as considered appropriate. While the final resolution of these issues could result in costs below or above current accruals and, therefore, have an impact on our consolidated financial results in a future reporting period, we believe the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012
Under the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, which added Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company is required to disclose in its periodic reports if it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with entities or individuals designated pursuant to certain Executive Orders. Disclosure is required even where the activities are conducted outside the U.S. by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with applicable law, and even if the activities are not covered or prohibited by U.S. law. After the easing of certain sanctions by the United States against Iran in January 2016 and in compliance with the economic sanctions regulations administered by U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control
12
(OFAC) and U.S. export control laws, a wholly-owned non-U.S. subsidiary of the Company completed the following sales related to businesses in our Energy operating segment pursuant to and in compliance with the terms and conditions of OFAC’s General License H: sales of products used for process and water treatment applications in (i) upstream oil and gas production and (ii) petrochemical plants totaling $5.9 million during the subsidiary’s fiscal year ended November 30, 2017, and additional sales of such products totaling $0.4 million during December 2017, were made to a distributor in Dubai and two distributors in Iran. The net profit before taxes associated with these sales is estimated to be $1.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Our non-U.S. subsidiary intends to continue doing business in Iran under General License H in compliance with U.S. economic sanctions and export control laws, which sales may require additional disclosure pursuant to the abovementioned statute.
Available Information.
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information about the operation of the SEC Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. by calling the SEC at (800) 732-0330. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including the Company, that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
General information about us, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments and exhibits to those reports, are available free of charge through our website at www.ecolab.com/investor as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them with, or furnish them to, the SEC.
In addition, the following governance materials are available on our web site at www.ecolab.com/investors/corporate-governance: (i) charters of the Audit, Compensation, Finance, Governance and Safety, Health and Environment Committees of our Board of Directors; (ii) our Board's Corporate Governance Principles; and (iii) our Code of Conduct.
Executive Officers.
The persons listed in the following table are our current executive officers. Officers are elected annually. There is no family relationship among any of the directors or executive officers and no executive officer has been involved during the past ten years in any legal proceedings described in applicable Securities and Exchange Commission regulations.
Name |
|
Age |
|
Office |
|
Positions Held Since |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas M. Baker, Jr. |
|
59 |
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Jan. 2013 – Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christophe Beck |
|
50 |
|
Executive Vice President and President – Global Nalco Water |
|
May 2017 – Present |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and President – Global Water & Process Services |
|
May 2015 – May 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and President – Regions |
|
Jan. 2013 – May 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry L. Berger |
|
57 |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Technical Officer |
|
Jan. 2013 – Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alex N. Blanco |
|
57 |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Supply Chain Officer |
|
Jan. 2013 – Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darrell R. Brown |
|
54 |
|
Executive Vice President and President – Energy Services |
|
Jan. 2018 – Present |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Global Downstream and WellChem |
|
Apr. 2017 – Dec. 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and President – Europe |
|
Feb. 2014 – Mar. 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and President – Asia Pacific |
|
Jan. 2013 – Jan. 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas W. Handley |
|
63 |
|
President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
Jan. 2013 – Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael A. Hickey |
|
56 |
|
Executive Vice President and President – Global Institutional |
|
Jan. 2013 – Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roberto Inchaustegui |
|
62 |
|
Executive Vice President and President – Global Services and Specialty |
|
Jan. 2013 – Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruno Lavandier |
|
51 |
|
Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller |
|
May 2017 – Present |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Ecolab Catalyst Program |
|
Mar. 2017 – Apr. 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President of Finance, Global Supply Chain |
|
Jan. 2015 – Feb. 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance, Global Supply Chain |
|
Aug. 2014 – Dec. 2014 |
|
|
|
|
President TIORCO and Vice President of Nalco EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery) Solutions |
|
Jan. 2013 – July 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurie M. Marsh |
|
54 |
|
Executive Vice President – Human Resources |
|
Nov. 2013 – Present |
|
|
|
|
Vice President – Total Rewards and HR Service Delivery & Technology |
|
Jan. 2013 – Oct. 2013 |
13
Name |
|
Age |
|
Office |
|
Positions Held Since |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael C. McCormick |
|
55 |
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
|
Oct. 2017 – Present |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary |
|
Mar. 2017 – Sep. 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer, Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary |
|
June 2016 – Feb. 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary |
|
Mar. 2014 – May 2016 |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Compliance Officer, Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary |
|
Jan. 2013 – Feb. 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy P. Mulhere |
|
55 |
|
Executive Vice President and President – Regions |
|
May 2015 – Present |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and President – Global Water and Process Services |
|
Jan. 2013 – May 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel J. Schmechel |
|
58 |
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
Jan. 2017 – Present |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Jan. 2013 – Dec. 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jill S. Wyant |
|
46 |
|
Executive Vice President and President – Global Regions and Global Healthcare |
|
Jan. 2018 – Present |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and President – Global Food & Beverage, Healthcare and Life Sciences |
|
May 2016 – Dec. 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and President – Global Food & Beverage |
|
Jan. 2013 – Apr. 2016 |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-K, including Part I, Item 1, entitled “Business”, and the MD&A within Part II, Item 7, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include expectations concerning items such as:
· |
amount, funding and timing of cash expenditures relating to our restructuring and other initiatives |
· |
future cash flows, access to capital, targeted credit rating metrics and impact of credit rating downgrade |
· |
uses for cash, including dividends, share repurchases, debt repayments, capital investments and strategic business acquisitions |
· |
global market risk |
· |
impact of oil price fluctuations, comparative performance and prospects of businesses in our Global Energy segment |
· |
long-term potential of our business |
· |
impact of changes in exchange rates and interest rates |
· |
customer retention rate |
· |
bad debt experience, non-performance of counterparties and losses due to concentration of credit risk |
· |
disputes, claims and litigation |
· |
environmental contingencies |
· |
impact and cost of complying with laws and regulations |
· |
sustainability targets |
· |
returns on pension plan assets |
· |
contributions to pension and postretirement healthcare plans |
· |
amortization expense |
· |
impact of new accounting pronouncements |
· |
income taxes, including valuation allowances, loss carryforwards, unrecognized tax benefits, uncertain tax positions and deductibility of goodwill |
· |
recognition of share-based compensation expense |
· |
payments under operating leases |
· |
future benefit plan payments |
· |
market position |
· |
doing business in Iran |
14
Without limiting the foregoing, words or phrases such as “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will be”, “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “we believe,” “we expect,” “estimate,” “project” (including the negative or variations thereof), “intends,” “could” or similar terminology, generally identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may also represent challenging goals for us. These statements, which represent the Company’s expectations or beliefs concerning various future events, are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those of such forward-looking statements. We caution that undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. For a further discussion of these and other factors which could cause results to differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statement, see Item 1A of this Form 10-K, entitled “Risk Factors”. Except as may be required under applicable law, we undertake no duty to update our forward-looking statements.
The following are important factors which could affect our financial performance and could cause our actual results for future periods to differ materially from our anticipated results or other expectations, including those expressed in any forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-K. See the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” set forth above.
We may also refer to this disclosure to identify factors that may cause results to differ from those expressed in other forward-looking statements including those made in oral presentations, including telephone conferences and/or webcasts open to the public.
Our results depend upon the continued vitality of the markets we serve.
Economic downturns, and in particular downturns in our larger markets including the energy, foodservice, hospitality, travel, health care, food processing, pulp and paper, mining and steel industries, can adversely impact our end-users. The well completion and stimulation, oil and gas production and refinery and petrochemical plant markets served by our Global Energy segment may be impacted by substantial fluctuations in oil and gas prices; in 2015 and 2016, the Global Energy segment experienced decreased sales as a result of very challenging global energy market conditions. In recent years, the weaker global economic environment, particularly in Europe and emerging markets such as China and Brazil, has also negatively impacted many of our end-markets. Weaker economic activity may continue to adversely affect these markets. During such cycles, these end-users may reduce or discontinue their volume of purchases of cleaning and sanitizing products and water treatment and process chemicals, which has had, and may continue to have, an adverse effect on our business.
Our results are impacted by general worldwide economic factors.
Economic factors such as the worldwide economy, capital flows, interest rates and currency movements, including, in particular, our exposure to foreign currency risk, have affected our business in the past and may have a material adverse impact on our business in the future. In 2011 and 2012, the European Union’s sovereign debt crisis negatively impacted economic activity in that region as well as the strength of the euro versus the U.S. dollar. Additionally, the June 2016 Brexit vote resulted in a sharp decline in the value of the British pound, as compared to the U.S. dollar and other currencies, and the possibility for referendum by other EU member states may lead to further market volatility. Other regions of the world, including emerging market areas, also expose us to foreign currency risk. As a result of increasing currency controls, importation restrictions, workforce regulations, pricing constraints and local capitalization requirements, we deconsolidated our Venezuelan subsidiaries effective as of the end of the fourth quarter of 2015. Prior to deconsolidation, across the second through fourth quarters of 2015, we devalued our Venezuelan bolivar operations within our Water, Paper, Food & Beverage, Institutional and Energy operating segments. Similar currency devaluations, credit market disruptions or other economic turmoil in other countries could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows by negatively impacting economic activity, including in our key end-markets, and by further weakening the local currency versus the U.S. dollar, resulting in reduced sales and earnings from our foreign operations, which are generated in the local currency, and then translated to U.S. dollars.
If we are unsuccessful in executing on key business initiatives, including our Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) system upgrade, our business could be adversely affected.
We continue to execute key business initiatives, including investments to develop business systems and restructurings such as those discussed under Note 3 entitled “Special (Gains) and Charges” of this Form 10-K, as part of our ongoing efforts to improve our efficiency and returns. In particular, we are implementing an ERP system upgrade, which is expected to occur in phases over the next several years. This upgrade, which includes supply chain and certain finance functions, is expected to improve the efficiency of certain financial and related transactional processes. The upgrade involves complex business process design and a failure of certain of these processes could result in business disruption. If the projects in which we are investing or the initiatives which we are pursuing are not successfully executed, our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows could be adversely affected.
15
We may be subject to information technology system failures, network disruptions and breaches in data security.
We rely to a large extent upon information technology systems and infrastructure to operate our business. The size and complexity of our information technology systems make them potentially vulnerable to failure, malicious intrusion and random attack. The Nalco and Champion transactions, as well as more recent acquisitions, have resulted in further de-centralization of systems and additional complexity in our systems infrastructure. Likewise, data security breaches by employees and others with permitted access to our systems may pose a risk that sensitive data may be exposed to unauthorized persons or to the public. While we have invested in protection of data and information technology, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent failures, cybersecurity attacks or breaches in our systems that could cause reputational damage, business disruption and legal and regulatory costs; could result in third-party claims; could result in compromise or misappropriation of our intellectual property, trade secrets and sensitive information; or could otherwise adversely affect our business. There may be other related challenges and risks as we continue to implement our ERP system upgrade.
We depend on key personnel to lead our business.
Our continued success will largely depend on our ability to attract and retain a high caliber of talent and on the efforts and abilities of our executive officers and certain other key employees, particularly those with sales and sales management responsibilities. This is especially crucial as we continue the integration of new businesses, which may be led by personnel that we believe are critical to the success of the integration and the prospects of the business. Our operations could be adversely affected if for any reason we were unable to attract or retain such officers or key employees.
Our significant non-U.S. operations expose us to global economic, political and legal risks that could impact our profitability.
We have significant operations outside the United States, including joint ventures and other alliances. We conduct business in approximately 170 countries and, in 2017, approximately 47% of our net sales originated outside the United States. There are inherent risks in our international operations, including:
· |
exchange controls and currency restrictions; |
· |
currency fluctuations and devaluations; |
· |
tariffs and trade barriers; |
· |
export duties and quotas; |
· |
changes in the availability and pricing of raw materials, energy and utilities; |
· |
changes in local economic conditions; |
· |
changes in laws and regulations, including the imposition of economic or trade sanctions affecting international commercial transactions; |
· |
impact from Brexit and the possibility of similar events in other EU member states; |
· |
difficulties in managing international operations and the burden of complying with foreign laws; |
· |
requirements to include local ownership or management in our business; |
· |
economic and business objectives that differ from those of our joint venture partners; |
· |
exposure to possible expropriation, nationalization or other government actions; |
· |
restrictions on our ability to repatriate dividends from our subsidiaries; |
· |
unsettled political conditions, military action, civil unrest, acts of terrorism, force majeure, war or other armed conflict; and |
· |
countries whose governments have been hostile to U.S.-based businesses. |
Also, because of uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of laws and regulations and the enforceability of intellectual property and contract rights, we face risks in some countries that our intellectual property rights and contract rights would not be enforced by local governments. We are also periodically faced with the risk of economic uncertainty, which has impacted our business in some countries. Other risks in international business also include difficulties in staffing and managing local operations, including managing credit risk to local customers and distributors.
Further, our operations outside the United States require us to comply with a number of United States and international regulations, including anti-corruption laws such as the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, as well as U.S. and international economic sanctions regulations. We have internal policies and procedures relating to such regulations; however, there is risk that such policies and procedures will not always protect us from the misconduct or reckless acts of employees or representatives, particularly in the case of recently acquired operations that may not have significant training in applicable compliance policies and procedures. Violations of such laws and regulations could result in disruptive investigations of the Company, significant fines and sanctions, which could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Our overall success as a global business depends, in part, upon our ability to succeed in differing economic, social, legal and political conditions. We may not continue to succeed in developing and implementing policies and strategies that are effective in each location where we do business, which could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Our growth depends upon our ability to successfully compete with respect to value, innovation and customer support.
Our competitive market is made up of numerous global, national, regional and local competitors. Our ability to compete depends in part upon our ability to maintain a superior technological capability and to continue to identify, develop and commercialize innovative, high value-added products for niche applications and commercial digital applications. There can be no assurance that we will be able to accomplish this or that technological developments by our competitors will not place certain of our products at a competitive
16
disadvantage in the future. In addition, certain of the new products that we have under development will be offered in markets in which we do not currently compete, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in those new markets. If we fail to introduce new technologies or commercialize our digital offerings on a timely basis, we may lose market share and our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows could be adversely affected.
Our business depends on our ability to comply with laws and governmental regulations, and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.
Our business is subject to numerous laws and regulations relating to the environment, including evolving climate change standards, and to the manufacture, storage, distribution, sale and use of our products as well as to the conduct of our business generally, including employment and labor laws. Compliance with these laws and regulations exposes us to potential financial liability and increases our operating costs. Regulation of our products and operations continues to increase with more stringent standards, causing increased costs of operations and potential for liability if a violation occurs. The potential cost to us relating to environmental and product registration laws and regulations is uncertain due to factors such as the unknown magnitude and type of possible contamination and clean-up costs, the complexity and evolving nature of laws and regulations, and the timing and expense of compliance. Changes to current laws (including tax laws), regulations and policies could impose new restrictions, costs or prohibitions on our current practices which would adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Changes to labor and employment laws and regulations, as well as related rulings by courts and administrative bodies, could adversely affect our operations and expose us to potential financial liability.
Our results could be adversely affected by difficulties in securing the supply of certain raw materials or by fluctuations in the cost of raw materials.
The prices of raw materials used in our business can fluctuate from time to time, and in recent years we have experienced periods of increased raw material costs. Changes in raw material prices, unavailability of adequate and reasonably priced raw materials or substitutes for those raw materials, or the inability to obtain or renew supply agreements on favorable terms can adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. In addition, volatility and disruption in economic activity and conditions could disrupt or delay the performance of our suppliers and thus impact our ability to obtain raw materials at favorable prices or on favorable terms, which may adversely affect our business.
Consolidation of our customers and vendors could affect our results.
Customers and vendors in the foodservice, hospitality, travel, healthcare, energy, food processing and pulp and paper industries, as well as other industries we serve, have consolidated in recent years and that trend may continue. This consolidation could have an adverse impact on our ability to retain customers and on our margins and consolidated results of operations.
Our subsidiaries are defendants in pending lawsuits alleging negligence and injury resulting from the use of our COREXIT dispersant in response to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which could expose us to monetary damages or settlement costs.
Our subsidiaries were named as defendants in pending lawsuits alleging negligence and injury resulting from the use of our COREXIT dispersant in response to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which could expose us to monetary damages or settlement costs. On April 22, 2010, the deepwater drilling platform, the Deepwater Horizon, operated by a subsidiary of BP plc, sank in the Gulf of Mexico after a catastrophic explosion and fire that began on April 20, 2010. A massive oil spill resulted. Approximately one week following the incident, subsidiaries of BP plc, under the authorization of the responding federal agencies, formally requested our indirect subsidiary, Nalco Company, to supply large quantities of COREXIT 9500, a Nalco oil dispersant product listed on the U.S. EPA National Contingency Plan Product Schedule. Nalco Company responded immediately by providing available COREXIT and increasing production to supply the product to BP’s subsidiaries for use, as authorized and directed by agencies of the federal government.
Nalco Company and certain affiliates (collectively “Nalco”) were named as a defendant in a series of class action and individual plaintiff lawsuits arising from this event. The plaintiffs in these matters claimed damages under products liability, tort and other theories. Nalco was also named as a third party defendant in certain matters. Nalco was indemnified in these matters by another of the defendants.
These cases were administratively transferred to a judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana with other related cases under In Re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, Case No. 10-md-02179 (E.D. La.) (the “MDL”).
Nalco Company, the incident defendants and the other responder defendants have been named as third party defendants by Transocean Deepwater Drilling, Inc. and its affiliates (the “Transocean Entities”) (In re the Complaint and Petition of Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, et al, MDL No. 2179, Civil Action 10-2771). In April and May 2011, the Transocean Entities, Cameron International Corporation, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., M-I L.L.C., Weatherford U.S., L.P. and Weatherford International, Inc. (collectively, the “Cross Claimants”) filed cross claims in MDL 2179 against Nalco Company and other unaffiliated cross defendants. The Cross Claimants generally allege, among other things, that if they are found liable for damages resulting from the Deepwater Horizon explosion, oil spill and/or spill response, they are entitled to indemnity or contribution from the cross defendants.
On November 28, 2012, the Federal Court in the MDL entered an order dismissing all claims against Nalco. Because claims remained pending against other defendants, the Court’s decision was not a “final judgment” for purposes of appeal. Plaintiffs will have 30 days after entry of final judgment to appeal the Court’s decision. We cannot predict whether there will be an appeal of the dismissal, the involvement we might have in these matters in the future or the potential for future litigation. However, if an appeal by plaintiffs in these
17
lawsuits is brought and won, these suits could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In December 2012 and January 2013, the MDL court issued final orders approving two settlements between BP and Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel: (1) a proposed Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement; and (2) a proposed Economic and Property Damages Class Action Settlement. Pursuant to the proposed settlements, class members agree to release claims against BP and other released parties, including Nalco Company and its related entities.
Nalco was named in nine additional complaints in May 2016, and two additional complaints in April 2017, filed by individuals alleging, among other things, business and economic loss resulting from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The plaintiffs in these lawsuits are generally seeking awards of unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs. These actions have been consolidated in the MDL. Certain of these complaints were dismissed on July 19, 2017.
On February 22, 2017, the Federal Court in the MDL ordered that plaintiffs who had previously filed a claim and who had “opted out” of and not released their claims under the Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement either: (1) complete a sworn statement indicating, among other things, that they opted out of the Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement (to be completed by plaintiffs who previously filed an individual complaint); or (2) file an individual lawsuit attaching the sworn statement as an exhibit, by a deadline date set by the Court. On July 18, 2017, the Court dismissed certain claims not complying with such order.
There currently remain nine cases pending against Nalco. We expect they will be dismissed pursuant to the Court’s November 28, 2012 order granting Nalco’s motion for summary judgment.
Nalco continues to sell the COREXIT oil dispersant product and could be exposed to future lawsuits from the use of such product. We cannot predict the potential for future litigation with respect to such sales. However, if one or more of such lawsuits are brought and won, these suits could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
We enter into multi-year contracts with customers that could impact our results.
Our multi-year contracts with some of our customers include terms affecting our pricing flexibility. There can be no assurance that these restraints will not have an adverse impact on our margins and consolidated results of operations.
If we are unsuccessful in integrating acquisitions, our business could be adversely affected.
As part of our long-term strategy, we seek to acquire complementary businesses. There can be no assurance that we will find attractive acquisition candidates or succeed at effectively managing the integration of acquired businesses into existing businesses. If the underlying business performance of such acquired businesses deteriorates, the expected synergies from such transactions do not materialize or we fail to successfully integrate new businesses into our existing businesses, our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows could be adversely affected.
Changes in tax laws and unanticipated tax liabilities could adversely affect the taxes we pay and our profitability.
We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and foreign jurisdictions, and our operations, plans and results are affected by tax and other initiatives around the world. In particular, we are affected by the impact of changes to tax laws or related authoritative interpretations in the United States, including tax reform under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) signed by the President of the United States on December 22, 2017, which includes broad and complex changes to the United States tax code and the state tax response to the Tax Act, including, but not limited to variability in our future tax rate. We are also subject to changes in tax law outside the United States, such as interpretation as to the legality of tax advantages granted under the European Union state aid rules. In addition, we are impacted by settlements of pending or any future adjustments proposed by the IRS or other taxing authorities in connection with our tax audits, all of which will depend on their timing, nature and scope. Increases in income tax rates, changes in income tax laws or unfavorable resolution of tax matters could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
Future events may impact our deferred tax position, including the utilization of foreign tax credits and undistributed earnings of international affiliates that are considered to be reinvested indefinitely.
We evaluate the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the need for deferred tax liabilities based on available evidence. This process involves significant management judgment about assumptions that are subject to change from period to period based on changes in tax laws or variances between future projected operating performance and actual results. We are required to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if we determine, based on available evidence at the time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In making this determination, we evaluate all positive and negative evidence as of the end of each reporting period. Future adjustments (either increases or decreases), to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance are determined based upon changes in the expected realization of the net deferred tax assets. The realization of the deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income in either the carry-back or carry-forward periods under the tax law. Due to significant estimates used to establish the valuation allowance and the potential for changes in facts and circumstances, it is reasonably possible that we will be required to record adjustments to the valuation allowance in future reporting periods. Changes to the valuation allowance or the amount of deferred tax liabilities could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations or financial position. Further, should we change our assertion regarding the permanent reinvestment of the undistributed earnings of international affiliates, a deferred tax liability may need to be established.
18
Our indebtedness may limit our operations and our use of our cash flow, and any failure to comply with the covenants that apply to our indebtedness could adversely affect our liquidity and financial statements.
As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $7.3 billion in outstanding indebtedness, with approximately $1.0 billion in the form of floating rate debt. Our debt level and related debt service obligations may have negative consequences, including:
· |
requiring us to dedicate significant cash flow from operations to the payment of principal and interest on our debt, which reduces the funds we have available for other purposes such as acquisitions and capital investment; |
· |
reducing our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business and market conditions; |
· |
exposing us to interest rate risk since a portion of our debt obligations are at variable rates. For example, a one percentage point increase in the average interest rate on our floating rate debt at December 31, 2017 would increase future interest expense by approximately $10 million per year; and |
· |
increasing our cost of funds and adversely affecting our liquidity and access to the capital markets should we fail to maintain the credit ratings assigned to us by independent rating agencies. |
If we add new debt, the risks described above could increase.
Severe public health outbreaks may adversely impact our business.
Our business could be adversely affected by the effect of a public health epidemic. The United States and other countries have experienced, and may experience in the future, public health outbreaks such as Zika virus, Avian Flu, SARS and H1N1 influenza. A prolonged occurrence of a contagious disease such as these could result in a significant downturn in the foodservice, hospitality and travel industries and also may result in health or other government authorities imposing restrictions on travel further impacting our end markets. Any of these events could result in a significant drop in demand for some of our products and services and adversely affect our business.
We incur significant expenses related to the amortization of intangible assets and may be required to report losses resulting from the impairment of goodwill or other assets recorded in connection with the Nalco and Champion transactions and other acquisitions.
We expect to continue to complete selected acquisitions and joint venture transactions in the future. In connection with acquisition and joint venture transactions, applicable accounting rules generally require the tangible and intangible assets of the acquired business to be recorded on the balance sheet of the acquiring company at their fair values. Intangible assets other than goodwill are required to be amortized over their estimated useful lives and this expense may be significant. Any excess in the purchase price paid by the acquiring company over the fair value of tangible and intangible assets of the acquired business is recorded as goodwill. If it is later determined that the anticipated future cash flows from the acquired business may be less than the carrying values of the assets and goodwill of the acquired business, the assets or goodwill may be deemed to be impaired. In this case, the acquiring company may be required under applicable accounting rules to write down the value of the assets or goodwill on its balance sheet to reflect the extent of the impairment. This write-down of assets or goodwill is generally recognized as a non-cash expense in the statement of operations of the acquiring company for the accounting period during which the write down occurs. As of December 31, 2017, we had goodwill of $7.2 billion which is maintained in various reporting units, including goodwill from the Nalco and Champion transactions. If we determine that any of the assets or goodwill recorded in connection with the Nalco and Champion transactions or any other prior or future acquisitions or joint venture transactions have become impaired, we will be required to record a loss resulting from the impairment. Impairment losses could be significant and could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
A chemical spill or release could adversely impact our business.
As a manufacturer and supplier of chemical products, there is a potential for chemicals to be accidentally spilled, released or discharged, either in liquid or gaseous form, during production, transportation, storage or use. Such a release could result in environmental contamination as well as a human or animal health hazard. Accordingly, such a release could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Extraordinary events may significantly impact our business.
The occurrence of (a) litigation or claims, (b) the loss or insolvency of a major customer or distributor, (c) war (including acts of terrorism or hostilities which impact our markets), (d) natural or manmade disasters, (e) water shortages or (f) severe weather conditions affecting the energy, foodservice, hospitality and travel industries may have a material adverse effect on our business.
Defense of litigation, particularly certain types of actions such as antitrust, patent infringement, wage hour and class action lawsuits, can be costly and time consuming even if ultimately successful, and if not successful could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
19
While we have a diverse customer base and no customer or distributor constitutes 10 percent or more of our consolidated revenues, we do have customers and independent, third-party distributors, the loss of which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows for the affected earnings periods.
War (including acts of terrorism or hostilities), natural or manmade disasters, water shortages or severe weather conditions affecting the energy, foodservice, hospitality, travel, health care, food processing, pulp and paper, mining, steel and other industries can cause a downturn in the business of our customers, which in turn can have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
We have no unresolved comments from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Our manufacturing philosophy is to manufacture products wherever an economic, process or quality assurance advantage exists or where proprietary manufacturing techniques dictate in-house production. Currently, most products that we sell are manufactured at our facilities. We position our manufacturing locations and warehouses in a manner to permit ready access to our customers.
Our manufacturing facilities produce chemical products as well as medical devices and equipment for all of our operating segments, although Pest Elimination purchases the majority of their products and equipment from outside suppliers. Our chemical production process consists of producing intermediates via basic reaction chemistry and subsequently blending and packaging those intermediates with other purchased raw materials into finished products in powder, solid and liquid form. Our devices and equipment manufacturing operations consist of producing chemical product dispensers and injectors and other mechanical equipment, medical devices, dishwasher racks, related sundries, dish machine refurbishment and water monitoring and maintenance equipment system from purchased components and subassemblies.
The following table profiles our more significant physical properties with approximately 70,000 square feet or more with ongoing production activities, as well as certain other facilities important in terms of specialization and sources of supply. In general, manufacturing facilities located in the United States serve our U.S. markets and facilities located outside of the United States serve our International markets. However, most of the United States facilities do manufacture products for export.
PLANT PROFILES
Location |
Approximate Size (Sq. Ft.) |
Segment |
Majority Owned or Leased |
|||
Joliet, IL USA |
|
610,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Tai Cang, CHINA |
|
468,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Sainghin, FRANCE |
|
360,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Sugar Land, TX USA |
|
350,000 |
|
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
South Beloit, IL USA |
|
313,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial, Other |
|
Owned |
Jianghai, CHINA |
|
296,000 |
|
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Chalons, FRANCE |
|
280,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Soledad, COLUMBIA |
|
276,000 |
|
Global Energy |
|
Owned |
Clearing, IL USA |
|
270,000 |
|
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Jurong Island, SINGAPORE |
|
250,000 |
|
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Nanjing, CHINA |
|
240,000 |
|
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Garland, TX USA |
|
239,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Martinsburg, WV USA |
|
228,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Elwood City, PA USA |
|
222,000 |
|
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Weavergate, UNITED KINGDOM |
|
222,000 |
|
Global Industrial, Global Institutional |
|
Owned |
Celra, SPAIN |
|
218,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Greensboro, NC USA |
|
193,000 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Owned |
Fresno, TX USA |
|
192,000 |
|
Global Energy |
|
Owned |
Freeport, TX USA |
|
189,000 |
|
Global Energy |
|
Owned |
Las Americas, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC |
|
182,000 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Owned |
Jacksonville, FL USA |
|
181,000 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Leased |
Garyville, LA USA |
|
178,000 |
|
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Nieuwegein, NETHERLANDS |
|
168,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
La Romana, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC |
|
160,000 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Leased |
Tessenderlo, BELGIUM |
|
153,000 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Owned |
Cheltenham, AUSTRALIA |
|
145,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
20
Location |
Approximate Size (Sq. Ft.) |
Segment |
Majority Owned or Leased |
|||
Suzano, BRAZIL |
|
142,000 |
|
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
McDonough, GA USA |
|
141,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Darra, AUSTRALIA |
|
138,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Corsicana, TX USA |
|
137,000 |
|
Global Energy |
|
Owned |
Burlington, ON CANADA |
|
136,000 |
|
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Eagan, MN USA |
|
133,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial, Other |
|
Owned |
Huntington, IN USA |
|
127,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Rozzano, ITALY |
|
126,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
City of Industry, CA USA |
|
125,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Mississauga, ON CANADA |
|
120,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Leased |
Aberdeen, UNITED KINGDOM |
|
118,000 |
|
Global Energy |
|
Owned |
Elk Grove Village, IL USA |
|
115,000 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Leased |
Biebesheim, GERMANY |
|
109,000 |
|
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Fort Worth, TX USA |
|
101,000 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Leased |
Johannesburg, SOUTH AFRICA |
|
100,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Hamilton, NEW ZEALAND |
|
96,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Calgary, AB CANADA |
|
94,000 |
|
Global Energy |
|
Owned |
Kwinana, AUSTRALIA |
|
87,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Yangsan, KOREA |
|
85,000 |
|
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Cisterna, ITALY |
|
80,000 |
|
Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Cuautitlan, MEXICO |
|
76,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Barueri, BRAZIL |
|
75,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Leased |
Mullingar, IRELAND |
|
74,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Leased |
Mosta, MALTA |
|
73,000 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Leased |
Noviciado, CHILE |
|
70,000 |
|
Global Industrial, Global Institutional |
|
Owned |
Navanakorn, THAILAND |
|
67,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Leased |
Aubagne, FRANCE |
|
65,000 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Leased |
Rovigo, ITALY |
|
60,000 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Owned |
Siegsdorf, GERMANY |
|
56,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Verona, ITALY |
|
55,000 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Owned |
Guangzhou, CHINA |
|
55,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Lerma, MEXICO |
|
49,000 |
|
Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Maribor, SLOVENIA |
|
46,400 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM |
|
25,000 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Owned |
Baglan, UNITED KINGDOM |
|
24,400 |
|
Global Institutional |
|
Leased |
Noda, JAPAN |
|
22,000 |
|
Global Institutional, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Steritimak, RUSSIA |
|
20,000 |
|
Global Energy, Global Industrial |
|
Owned |
Generally, our manufacturing facilities are adequate to meet our existing in-house production needs. We continue to invest in our plant sites to maintain viable operations and to add capacity as necessary to meet business imperatives.
Most of our manufacturing plants also serve as distribution centers. In addition, we operate distribution centers around the world, most of which are leased, and utilize third party logistics service providers to facilitate the distribution of our products and services.
At year-end 2017, our corporate headquarters was comprised of four multi-storied buildings located in downtown St. Paul, Minnesota. We own two of the buildings – a six story building and the 17-story building purchased from The Travelers Indemnity Company on August 4, 2015. This building, with 485,000 square feet of office space, became the principal office of the Company in 2017, replacing the 280,000-square foot, 19-story building previously serving as the principal office. The process of vacating the former principal office will be completed during 2018. The fourth building, which is leased through 2019, has been substantially vacated by the Company. A 90-acre campus in Eagan, Minnesota is owned and provides for future growth. The Eagan facility houses a significant research and development center, a data center and training facilities as well as several of our administrative functions.
We also have a significant business presence in Naperville, Illinois, where our Water and Paper operating segments maintain their principal administrative offices and research center. As discussed in Part II, Item 8, Note 6, “Debt and Interest” of this Form 10-K, we previously acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning the Naperville facility in 2015 and repaid the remaining debt on the facility during 2017. The lease on the facility has since been terminated and the trust has conveyed its ownership interest in the facility to the Company. Our Energy operating segment maintains Company-owned administrative and research facilities in Sugar Land, Texas and additional research facilities in Fresno, Texas.
21
Significant regional administrative and/or research facilities are located in Campinas, Brazil, Leiden, Netherlands, and Pune, India, which we own, and in and Dubai, UAE, Lille, France, Miramar, Florida, Monheim, Germany, Singapore, Shanghai, China and Zurich, Switzerland, which we lease. We also have a network of small leased sales offices in the United States and, to a lesser extent, in other parts of the world.
Discussion of legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from Part II, Item 8, Note 15, “Commitments and Contingencies,” of this Form 10-K and should be considered an integral part of Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings.”
Discussion of other environmental-related legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from Part I, Item 1 above, under the heading “Environmental and Regulatory Considerations”.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
22
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ECL.” Our common stock is also traded on an unlisted basis on certain other United States exchanges. The high and low sales prices of our common stock on the consolidated transaction reporting system during 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||
Quarter |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
First |
|
$ 126.17 |
|
$ 117.29 |
|
$ 113.69 |
|
$ 98.62 |
|
Second |
|
134.89 |
|
124.42 |
|
121.81 |
|
109.83 |
|
Third |
|
134.28 |
|
127.18 |
|
124.60 |
|
116.66 |
|
Fourth |
|
137.96 |
|
128.38 |
|
122.28 |
|
110.65 |
|
Holders
On January 31, 2018, we had 6,324 holders of record of our Common Stock.
Dividends
We have paid common stock dividends for 81 consecutive years. Cash dividends of $0.35 per share were declared in February, May and August 2016. Cash dividends of $0.37 per share were declared in December 2016, February, May and August 2017. A dividend of $0.41 per share was declared in December 2017.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares |
|
Maximum number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased as part of |
|
shares that may yet be |
|
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
Average price paid |
|
publicly announced |
|
purchased under the |
|
|
Period |
|
shares purchased (1) |
|
per share (2) |
|
plans or programs (3) |
|
plans or programs (3) |
|
|
October 1-31, 2017 |
|
4,284 |
|
|
$131.3391 |
|
- |
|
12,358,110 |
|
November 1-30, 2017 |
|
1,267 |
|
|
131.6250 |
|
- |
|
12,358,110 |
|
December 1-31, 2017 |
|
87,432 |
|
|
136.2796 |
|
- |
|
12,358,110 |
|
Total |
|
92,983 |
|
|
135.9886 |
|
- |
|
12,358,110 |
|
(1) |
Includes 92,983 shares reacquired from employees and/or directors to satisfy the exercise price of stock options or shares surrendered to satisfy statutory tax obligations under our stock incentive plans. |
(2) |
The average price paid per share includes brokerage commissions associated with publicly announced plan purchases plus the value of such other reacquired shares. |
(3) |
As announced on February 24, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 20,000,000 shares. Subject to market conditions, we expect to repurchase all shares under these authorizations, for which no expiration date has been established, in open market or privately negotiated transactions, including pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 and accelerated share repurchase program. |
23
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
December 31, millions, except per share amounts and employees |
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||||
OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$13,838.3 |
|
|
|
|
$13,152.8 |
|
|
|
$13,545.1 |
|
|
|
$14,280.5 |
|
|
|
$13,253.4 |
|
Cost of sales (including special (gains) and charges (1)) |
|
7,405.1 |
|
|
|
|
6,898.9 |
|
|
|
7,223.5 |
|
|
|
7,679.1 |
|
|
|
7,161.2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
4,417.1 |
|
|
|
|
4,299.4 |
|
|
|
4,345.5 |
|
|
|
4,577.6 |
|
|
|
4,360.3 |
|
Special (gains) and charges |
|
(3.7) |
|
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
|
|
414.8 |
|
|
|
68.8 |
|
|
|
171.3 |
|
Operating income |
|
2,019.8 |
|
|
|
|
1,915.0 |
|
|
|
1,561.3 |
|
|
|
1,955.0 |
|
|
|
1,560.6 |
|
Interest expense, net (including special (gains) and charges (1)) |
|
255.0 |
|
|
|
|
264.6 |
|
|
|
243.6 |
|
|
|
256.6 |
|
|
|
262.3 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
1,764.8 |
|
|
|
|
1,650.4 |
|
|
|
1,317.7 |
|
|
|
1,698.4 |
|
|
|
1,298.3 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
242.4 |
|
|
|
|
403.3 |
|
|
|
300.5 |
|
|
|
476.2 |
|
|
|
324.7 |
|
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
|
1,522.4 |
|
|
|
|
1,247.1 |
|
|
|
1,017.2 |
|
|
|
1,222.2 |
|
|
|
973.6 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest (including special (gains) and charges (1)) |
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Net income attributable to Ecolab |
|
$1,508.4 |
|
|
|
|
$1,229.6 |
|
|
|
$1,002.1 |
|
|
|
$1,202.8 |
|
|
|
$967.8 |
|
Diluted earnings per share, as reported (GAAP) |
|
$ 5.13 |
|
|
|
|
$ 4.14 |
|
|
|
$ 3.32 |
|
|
|
$ 3.93 |
|
|
|
$ 3.16 |
|
Diluted earnings per share, as adjusted (Non-GAAP) (2) |
|
$ 4.69 |
|
|
|
|
$ 4.37 |
|
|
|
$ 4.37 |
|
|
|
$ 4.18 |
|
|
|
$ 3.54 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic |
|
289.6 |
|
|
|
|
292.5 |
|
|
|
296.4 |
|
|
|
300.1 |
|
|
|
299.9 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted |
|
294.0 |
|
|
|
|
296.7 |
|
|
|
301.4 |
|
|
|
305.9 |
|
|
|
305.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELECTED INCOME STATEMENT RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
46.5 |
% |
|
|
|
47.5 |
% |
|
|
46.7 |
% |
|
|
46.2 |
% |
|
|
46.0 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
Operating income |
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
Net income attributable to Ecolab |
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL POSITION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$4,596.4 |
|
|
|
|
$4,279.4 |
|
|
|
$4,447.5 |
|
|
|
$4,853.0 |
|
|
|
$4,698.4 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
3,707.1 |
|
|
|
|
3,365.0 |
|
|
|
3,228.3 |
|
|
|
3,050.6 |
|
|
|
2,882.0 |
|
Goodwill, intangible and other assets |
|
11,658.9 |
|
|
|
|
10,685.8 |
|
|
|
10,965.9 |
|
|
|
11,523.8 |
|
|
|
12,027.4 |
|
Total assets |
|
$19,962.4 |
|
|
|
|
$18,330.2 |
|
|
|
$18,641.7 |
|
|
|
$19,427.4 |
|
|
|
$19,607.8 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
$3,431.8 |
|
|
|
|
$3,019.4 |
|
|
|
$4,764.4 |
|
|
|
$4,367.9 |
|
|
|
$3,487.5 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
6,758.3 |
|
|
|
|
6,145.7 |
|
|
|
4,260.2 |
|
|
|
4,843.4 |
|
|
|
6,016.0 |
|
Postretirement health care and pension benefits |
|
1,025.5 |
|
|
|
|
1,019.2 |
|
|
|
1,117.1 |
|
|
|
1,188.5 |
|
|
|
795.6 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
1,058.1 |
|
|
|
|
1,175.0 |
|
|
|
1,519.6 |
|
|
|
1,645.5 |
|
|
|
1,899.3 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
12,273.7 |
|
|
|
|
11,359.3 |
|
|
|
11,661.3 |
|
|
|
12,045.3 |
|
|
|
12,198.4 |
|
Ecolab shareholders’ equity |
|
7,618.5 |
|
|
|
|
6,901.1 |
|
|
|
6,909.9 |
|
|
|
7,315.9 |
|
|
|
7,344.3 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
70.2 |
|
|
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
|
70.5 |
|
|
|
66.2 |
|
|
|
65.1 |
|
Total equity |
|
7,688.7 |
|
|
|
|
6,970.9 |
|
|
|
6,980.4 |
|
|
|
7,382.1 |
|
|
|
7,409.4 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$19,962.4 |
|
|
|
|
$18,330.2 |
|
|
|
$18,641.7 |
|
|
|
$19,427.4 |
|
|
|
$19,607.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELECTED CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$2,091.3 |
|
|
|
|
$1,939.7 |
|
|
|
$1,999.8 |
|
|
|
$1,815.6 |
|
|
|
$1,559.8 |
|
Cash used for investing activities |
|
(1,673.2) |
|
|
|
|
(829.5) |
|
|
|
(915.8) |
|
|
|
(848.3) |
|
|
|
(2,087.7) |
|
Cash used for financing activities |
|
(522.7) |
|
|
|
|
(868.2) |
|
|
|
(1,150.9) |
|
|
|
(1,071.0) |
|
|
|
(292.6) |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
893.3 |
|
|
|
|
850.7 |
|
|
|
859.5 |
|
|
|
872.0 |
|
|
|
816.2 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
789.6 |
|
|
|
|
707.4 |
|
|
|
771.0 |
|
|
|
748.7 |
|
|
|
625.1 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
1.520 |
|
|
|
|
1.420 |
|
|
|
1.340 |
|
|
|
1.155 |
|
|
|
0.965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL MEASURES/OTHER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$7,322.7 |
|
|
|
|
$6,687.0 |
|
|
|
$6,465.5 |
|
|
|
$6,548.2 |
|
|
|
$6,875.8 |
|
Total debt to capitalization |
|
48.8 |
% |
|
|
|
49.0 |
% |
|
|
48.1 |
% |
|
|
47.0 |
% |
|
|
48.1 |
% |
Book value per common share |
|
$ 26.33 |
|
|
|
|
$ 23.65 |
|
|
|
$ 23.35 |
|
|
|
$ 24.40 |
|
|
|
$ 24.39 |
|
Return on beginning equity |
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
Dividends per share/diluted earnings per common share |
|
29.6 |
% |
|
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
40.4 |
% |
|
|
29.4 |
% |
|
|
30.5 |
% |
Net interest coverage |
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Year end market capitalization |
|
$38,821.3 |
|
|
|
|
$34,207.7 |
|
|
|
$33,852.7 |
|
|
|
$31,340.6 |
|
|
|
$31,399.4 |
|
Annual common stock price range |
|
$137.96 to |
|
|
|
|
$ 124.60 to |
|
|
|
$ 122.48 to |
|
|
|
$ 118.46 to |
|
|
|
$ 108.34 to |
|
|
|
$117.29 |
|
|
|
|
$98.62 |
|
|
|
$97.78 |
|
|
|
$97.65 |
|
|
|
$71.99 |
|
Number of employees |
|
48,400 |
|
|
|
|
47,565 |
|
|
|
47,145 |
|
|
|
47,430 |
|
|
|
45,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Cost of sales includes special charges of $44.0 in 2017, $66.0 in 2016, $80.6 in 2015, $14.3 in 2014, and $43.2 in 2013; Interest expense, net includes special charges of $21.9 in 2017 and $2.5 in 2013; Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest includes special charges of $12.8 in 2015 and $0.5 in 2013.
(2) Amounts exclude the impact of special (gains) and charges and discrete tax items.
24
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) provides information that we believe is useful in understanding our operating results, cash flows and financial condition. We provide quantitative information about the material sales drivers including the impact of changes in volume and pricing and the effect of acquisitions and changes in foreign currency at the corporate and reportable segment level. We also provide quantitative information regarding special (gains) and charges, discrete tax items and other significant factors we believe are useful for understanding our results. Such quantitative drivers are supported by comments meant to be qualitative in nature. Qualitative factors are generally ordered based on estimated significance.
The discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Form 10-K. Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This discussion contains various Non-GAAP Financial Measures and also contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We refer readers to the statements and information set forth in the sections entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” at the end of this MD&A, and “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” within Items 1 and 1A of this Form 10-K.
Comparability of Results
Fixed Currency Foreign Exchange Rates
Management evaluates the sales and operating income performance of our non-U.S. dollar functional currency international operations based on fixed currency exchange rates, which eliminate the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our international operations. Fixed currency amounts are updated annually at the beginning of each year based on translation into U.S. dollars at foreign currency exchange rates established by management, with all periods presented using such rates. Fixed currency exchange rates are generally based on existing market rates at the time they are established. Fixed currency amounts for 2015 also reflect all Venezuelan bolivar operations, prior to the deconsolidation of our Venezuelan operations, at the Marginal Currency System (“SIMADI”) rate at year end 2015 of approximately 200 bolivares to 1 U.S. dollar. Public currency rate data provided within the “Segment Performance” section of this MD&A reflect amounts translated at actual public average rates of exchange prevailing during the corresponding period, and is provided for informational purposes only.
Venezuela Related Activities
Effective as of the end of the fourth quarter of 2015, we deconsolidated our Venezuelan subsidiaries. Prior to deconsolidation, due to the country’s highly inflationary economy, the functional currency of our Venezuelan subsidiaries was the U.S. dollar. As a result, currency remeasurement adjustments for non-U.S. dollar denominated monetary assets and liabilities of our Venezuelan subsidiaries and other transactional foreign currency exchange gains and losses were reflected in earnings. Across the second through fourth quarters of 2015, the Venezuelan bolivar operations within our Water, Paper, Food & Beverage, Institutional and Energy operating segments were converted from the official exchange rate at the time of 6.3 bolivares to 1 U.S. dollar to the SIMADI rate at the time of approximately 200 bolivares to 1 U.S. dollar. As noted above, within our fixed currency sales and operating results, to present our historical Venezuelan bolivar operations at a consistent conversion rate, we have reflected all Venezuelan bolivar results for the 2015 reporting year at a SIMADI conversion rate of approximately 200 bolivares to 1 U.S. dollar.
Impact of Acquisitions and Divestitures
Acquisition adjusted growth rates exclude the results of our acquired businesses from the first twelve months post acquisition, exclude the results of our divested businesses from the twelve months prior to divestiture, and exclude the Venezuelan results of operations from all comparable periods.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We achieved accelerating sales and earnings growth through 2017 as we drove new product introductions, new business wins and improved operating efficiency in a mixed market environment. Increased pricing was implemented to offset higher delivered product costs. Earnings per share leveraged the solid operating income growth, benefiting from lower interest expense, taxes and shares outstanding, to deliver the solid EPS growth.
Sales
Reported sales increased 5% to $13.8 billion in 2017 from $13.2 billion in 2016. Sales were positively impacted by volume, pricing and acquisitions. When measured in fixed rates of foreign currency exchange, fixed currency sales increased 5% compared to the prior year. See the section entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” within this MD&A for further information on our non-GAAP measures and the “Net Sales” table on page 32 and the “Sales by Reportable Segment” table on page 38 for reconciliation information.
25
Gross Margin
Our reported gross margin was 46.5% of sales for 2017, compared to our 2016 reported gross margin of 47.5%. Excluding the impact of special (gains) and charges included in cost of sales from both 2017 and 2016, our adjusted gross margin was 46.8% in 2017 and 48.0% in 2016. See the section entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” within this MD&A for further information on our non-GAAP measures and the “Cost of Sales and Gross Profit Margin” table on page 32 for reconciliation information.
Operating Income
Reported operating income increased 5% to $2.0 billion in 2017, compared to $1.9 billion in 2016. Adjusted operating income, excluding the impact of special (gains) and charges, increased 2% in 2017. When measured in fixed rates of foreign currency exchange, adjusted fixed currency operating income increased 2%. See the section entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” within this MD&A for further information on our non-GAAP measures and the “Operating Income” table on page 35 and “Operating Income by Reportable Segment” table on page 38 for reconciliation information.
Earnings Attributable to Ecolab Per Common Share (“EPS”)
Reported diluted EPS increased 24% to $5.13 in 2017 compared to $4.14 in 2016. Special (gains) and charges had an impact on both years. Special (gains) and charges in 2017 were driven primarily by the impact of income tax reform, restructuring charges, other discrete taxes, acquisition and integration charges and the gain on sale of Equipment Care. Special (gains) and charges in 2016 were driven primarily by Energy related charges, Venezuelan related actions, restructuring charges and other gains and charges. Adjusted diluted EPS, which exclude the impact of special (gains) and charges and discrete tax items increased to $4.69 in 2017 compared to $4.37 in 2016. See the section entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” within this MD&A for further information on our non-GAAP measures, and the “Diluted EPS” table on page 37 for reconciliation information.
Balance Sheet
We remain committed to our stated objective of having an investment grade balance sheet, supported by our current credit ratings of A-/Baa1 by the major ratings agencies, and to achieving “A” range ratings metrics. We believe our strong balance sheet has allowed us continued access to capital at attractive rates.
Net Debt to EBITDA
Our net debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) was 2.4 and 2.3 for 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our net debt to adjusted EBITDA, defined as the sum of EBITDA and special (gains) and charges impacting EBITDA, was 2.4 for 2017 and 2.2 for 2016. We view these ratios as important indicators of the operational and financial health of our organization. See the section entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” within this MD&A for further information on our non-GAAP measures, and the “Net Debt to EBITDA” table on page 43 for reconciliation information.
Cash Flow
Cash flow from operating activities was $2.1 billion in 2017 compared to $1.9 billion in 2016. We continued to generate strong cash flow from operations, allowing us to fund our ongoing operations, acquisitions, investments in our business, debt repayments, pension obligations and return cash to our shareholders through share repurchases and dividend payments. See the section entitled “Cash Flows” within this MD&A for further information.
Dividends
We increased our quarterly cash dividend 11% in December 2017 to an indicated annual rate of $1.64 per share. The increase represents our 26th consecutive annual dividend rate increase and the 81st consecutive year we have paid cash dividends. Our outstanding dividend history reflects our continued growth and development, strong cash flows, solid financial position and confidence in our business prospects for the years ahead.
26
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We have adopted various accounting policies to prepare the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (“Notes”).
Preparation of our consolidated financial statements, in conformity with U.S. GAAP, requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are considered to be critical if they meet both of the following criteria: (1) the estimate requires assumptions to be made about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made, and (2) different estimates that we reasonably could have used for the accounting estimate in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition or results of operations.
Besides estimates that meet the “critical” estimate criteria, we make many other accounting estimates in preparing our financial statements and related disclosures. All estimates, whether or not deemed critical, affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues or expenses as well as disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates are based on experience and other information available prior to the issuance of the financial statements. Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known, even from estimates not deemed critical. Our critical accounting estimates include the following:
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue on product sales at the time evidence of an arrangement exists, title to the product and risk of loss transfers to the customer, the price is fixed and determinable and collection is reasonably assured. We recognize revenue on services as they are performed. While we employ a sales and service team to ensure our customers’ needs are best met in a high quality way, the majority of our revenue is generated from product sales. Our service businesses and service offerings are discussed in Note 17.
Our sales policies do not provide for general rights of return. We record estimated reductions to revenue for customer programs and incentive offerings including pricing arrangements, promotions and other volume-based incentives at the time the sale is recorded. We also record estimated reserves for product returns and credits at the time of sale and anticipated uncollectible accounts, as discussed below. Depending on market conditions, we may increase customer incentive offerings, which could reduce gross profit margins over the term of the incentive.
On January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Committee 606 (ASC 606), Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides guidance on how revenue with customers should be recognized. For additional information on our adoption of this accounting standard, see Note 2.
Valuation Allowances and Accrued Liabilities
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
We estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates. In addition, our estimates also include separately providing for customer receivables based on specific circumstances and credit conditions, and when it is deemed probable the balance is uncollectible. We estimate our sales returns and allowances by analyzing historical returns and credits, and apply these trend rates to calculate estimated reserves for future credits. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Our allowance for doubtful accounts balance was $72 million and $68 million, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These amounts include our allowance for sales returns and credits of $15 million and $14 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our bad debt expense as a percent of reported net sales was 0.1% in 2017 and 0.2% in 2016 and 2015. We believe it is reasonably likely that future results will be consistent with historical trends and experience. However, if the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an inability to make payments, or if unexpected events, economic downturns, or significant changes in future trends were to occur, additional allowances may be required.
For additional information on our allowance for doubtful accounts, see Note 2.
27
Accrued Liabilities
Our business and operations are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, the use and handling of hazardous substances, waste disposal and the investigation and remediation of soil and groundwater contamination. As with other companies engaged in similar manufacturing activities and providing similar products and services, some risk of environmental liability is inherent in our operations.
We record liabilities related to pending litigation, environmental claims and other contingencies when a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. Estimates used to record such liabilities are based on our best estimate of probable future costs. We record the amounts that represent the points in the range of estimates that we believe are most probable or the minimum amount when no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount. Potential insurance reimbursements generally are not anticipated in our accruals for environmental liabilities or other insured losses. Expected insurance proceeds are recorded as receivables when recovery is deemed certain. While the final resolution of litigation and environmental contingencies could result in amounts different than current accruals, and therefore have an impact on our consolidated financial results in a future reporting period, we believe the ultimate outcome will not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position.
For additional information on our commitments and contingencies, see Note 15.
Actuarially Determined Liabilities
Pension and Postretirement Healthcare Benefit Plans
The measurement of our pension and postretirement benefit obligations are dependent on a variety of assumptions determined by management and used by our actuaries. These assumptions affect the amount and timing of future contributions and expenses.
The significant assumptions used in developing the required estimates are the discount rate, expected return on assets, projected salary and health care cost increases and mortality table.
· |
The discount rate assumptions for our U.S. plans are assessed using a yield curve constructed from a subset of bonds yielding greater than the median return from a population of non-callable, corporate bond issues rated Aa by Moody’s Investor Services or AA by Standard & Poors. The discount rate is calculated by matching the plans’ projected cash flows to the bond yield curve. For 2017 and 2016, we elected to measure service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along that yield curve to the plans’ liability cash flows. We believe this approach provides a more precise measurement of service and interest costs by aligning the timing of the plans’ liability cash flows to the corresponding spot rates on the yield curve. For 2015, we measured service and interest costs utilizing a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the plan obligations. The change in approach did not affect the measurement of our plan obligations or the funded status of our plans. In determining our U.S. pension obligations for 2017, our weighted-average discount rate decreased to 3.70% from 4.27% at year-end 2016. In determining our U.S. postretirement health care obligation for 2017, our weighted-average discount rate decreased to 3.66% from 4.14% at year-end 2016. |
· |
The expected rate of return on plan assets reflects asset allocations, investment strategies and views of investment advisors, and represents our expected long-term return on plan assets. Our weighted-average expected return on U.S. plan assets used for determining the 2016, 2017 and 2018 U.S. pension and U.S. postretirement health care expenses was 7.75%. |
· |
Projected salary and health care cost increases are based on our long-term actual experience, the near term outlook and assumed inflation. Our weighted-average projected salary increase used in determining the 2016 U.S. pension expenses was 4.32%, for 2017 it was 4.03%, and for 2018 it is 4.03%. |
· |
For postretirement benefit measurement purposes as of December 31, 2017, the annual rates of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care were assumed to be 8.25% for pre-65 costs and 11.5% for post-65 costs. The rates are assumed to decrease each year until they reach 5% in 2028 and remain at those levels thereafter. |
· |
In determining our U.S. pension and U.S. postretirement health care obligation for 2017, we utilized the most recent mortality table, MP-2017 projection scale (applied to the RP-2006 mortality table). |
The effects of actual results differing from our assumptions, as well as changes in assumptions, are reflected in the unrecognized actuarial loss and amortized over future periods and, therefore, will generally affect our recognized expense in future periods. Significant differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions may materially affect future pension and other postretirement obligations. The unrecognized net actuarial loss on our U.S. qualified and non-qualified pension plans decreased to $527 million as of December 31, 2017 from $533 million as of December 31, 2016 (both before tax), primarily due to the amortization of prior period net actuarial losses.
28
The effect of a decrease in the discount rate or decrease in the expected return on assets assumption as of December 31, 2017, on the December 31, 2017 funded status and 2018 expense is shown below, assuming no changes in benefit levels and no amortization of gains or losses for our significant U.S. plans:
|
|
Effect on U.S. Pension Plans |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Increase in |
|
Higher |
||||
|
|
Assumption |
|
Recorded |
|
2018 |
||||
(millions) |
|
Change |
|
Obligation |
|
Expense |
||||
Discount rate |
|
-0.25 pts |
|
|
$77.2 |
|
|
|
$6.0 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
-0.25 pts |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
Effect on U.S. Postretirement |
||||||||
|
|
Health Care Benefits Plans |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Increase in |
|
Higher |
||||
|
|
Assumption |
|
Recorded |
|
2018 |
||||
(millions) |
|
Change |
|
Obligation |
|
Expense |
||||
Discount rate |
|
-0.25 pts |
|
|
$5.2 |
|
|
|
$0.6 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
-0.25 pts |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
- |
|
Our international pension obligations and underlying plan assets represent approximately one third of our global pension plans, with the majority of the amounts held in the U.K. and Eurozone countries. We use assumptions similar to our U.S. plan assumptions to measure our international pension obligations, however, the assumptions used vary by country based on specific local country requirements and information.
See Note 16 for further discussion concerning our accounting policies, estimates, funded status, contributions and overall financial positions of our pension and postretirement plan obligations.
Self Insurance
Globally we have insurance policies with varying deductible levels for property and casualty losses. We are insured for losses in excess of these deductibles, subject to policy terms and conditions and have recorded both a liability and an offsetting receivable for amounts in excess of these deductibles. We are self-insured for health care claims for eligible participating employees, subject to certain deductibles and limitations. We determine our liabilities for claims on an actuarial basis.
Restructuring
Our restructuring activities are associated with plans to enhance our efficiency, effectiveness and sharpen the competitiveness of our businesses. These restructuring plans include net costs associated with significant actions involving employee-related severance charges, contract termination costs and asset write-downs and disposals. Employee termination costs are largely based on policies and severance plans, and include personnel reductions and related costs for severance, benefits and outplacement services. These charges are reflected in the quarter in which the actions are probable and the amounts are estimable, which typically is when management approves the associated actions. Contract termination costs include charges to terminate leases prior to the end of their respective terms and other contract termination costs. Asset write-downs and disposals include leasehold improvement write-downs, other asset write-downs associated with combining operations and disposal of assets.
Restructuring charges have been included as a component of cost of sales, special (gains) and charges and net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Amounts included as a component of cost of sales include supply chain related severance and other asset write-downs associated with combining operations. Restructuring liabilities have been classified as a component of both other current and other noncurrent liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Our restructuring liability balance was $42 million and $40 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
For additional information on our restructuring activities, see Note 3.
29
Income Taxes
Judgment is required to determine the annual effective income tax rate, deferred tax assets and liabilities, any valuation allowances recorded against net deferred tax assets and uncertain tax positions.
On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), which reduces the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously indefinitely reinvested and creates new taxes on certain foreign sourced earnings. The Tax Act adds many new provisions including changes to bonus depreciation, the deduction for executive compensation and interest expense, a tax on global intangible low taxed income (GILTI), the base erosion anti abuse tax (BEAT) and a deduction for foreign derived intangible income (FDII). Some of these provisions, such as the tax on GILTI, may not apply to the Company with full effect until future years. The Company is assessing the impact of the provisions of the Act that do not apply until later years.
The two material items that impact us for 2017 are the reduction in the U.S. federal tax rate, as it relates to deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded on the balance sheet, and the one-time transition tax that is imposed on our unremitted foreign earnings. We have recorded provisional amounts for the income tax effects that included the reporting period the Tax Act was enacted. Judgement was used when applying the provisions of the Tax Act, including assumptions related to the impact of the lower corporate rate, and other analyses including, but not limited to, estimates of assets and liabilities at future dates and our calculation of deemed repatriation of deferred foreign income. Our provisional amounts are subject to further adjustments during the measurement period of up to one year following enactment of the Tax Act, as provided by recent SEC guidance.
Effective Income Tax Rate
Our effective income tax rate is based on annual income, statutory tax rates and tax planning available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Our annual effective income tax rate includes the impact of reserve provisions. We recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances. This expected annual rate is then applied to our year-to-date operating results. In the event that there is a significant discrete item recognized in our interim operating results, the tax attributable to that item would be separately calculated and recorded in the same period.
Tax regulations require items to be included in our tax returns at different times than the items are reflected in our financial statements. As a result, the effective income tax rate reflected in our financial statements differs from that reported in our tax returns. Some of these differences are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible on our tax return, and some are temporary differences, such as depreciation expense.
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities and Valuation Allowances
Temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets generally represent items that can be used as a tax deduction or credit in our tax return in future years for which we have already recorded the tax benefit in our income statement. We establish valuation allowances for our deferred tax assets when the amount of expected future taxable income is not likely to support the utilization of the entire deduction or credit. Relevant factors in determining the realizability of deferred tax assets include historical results, future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversal of temporary differences, tax planning strategies and the expiration dates of the various tax attributes. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent items for which we have already taken a deduction in our tax return, but have not yet recognized that tax benefit in our financial statements.
Prior to the enactment of the Tax Act, U.S. deferred income taxes had not been provided on certain unremitted foreign earnings that are considered permanently reinvested. Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries are considered to have been reinvested indefinitely or are available for distribution with foreign tax credits available to offset the amount of applicable income tax and foreign withholding taxes that might be payable on earnings. Upon enactment of the Tax Act, we recorded a one-time transition tax on certain unremitted foreign earnings of foreign subsidiaries, which is payable over eight years. We will continue to assert permanent reinvestment of the undistributed earnings of international affiliates, and if our policy changes we would record applicable taxes.
For additional information on income taxes see Note 12.
Uncertain Tax Positions
A number of years may elapse before a particular tax matter, for which we have established a reserve, is audited and finally resolved. The number of tax years with open tax audits varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has completed its examinations of our federal income tax returns (Ecolab and Nalco) through 2014. Our U.S. federal income tax returns for the years 2015 and 2016 are currently under audit. In addition to the U.S. federal examinations, we have ongoing audit activity in several U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions.
30
The tax positions we take are based on our interpretations of tax laws and regulations in the applicable federal, state and international jurisdictions. We believe our tax returns properly reflect the tax consequences of our operations, and our reserves for tax contingencies are appropriate and sufficient for the positions taken. Because of the uncertainty of the final outcome of these examinations, we have reserved for potential reductions of tax benefits (including related interest and penalties) for amounts that do not meet the more-likely-than-not thresholds for recognition and measurement as required by authoritative guidance. The tax reserves are reviewed throughout the year, taking into account new legislation, regulations, case law and audit results. Settlement of any particular issue could result in offsets to other balance sheet accounts, cash payments or receipts and/or adjustments to tax expense. The majority of our tax reserves are presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet within other non-current liabilities. Our gross liability for uncertain tax positions was $62 million and $76 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
For additional information on income taxes see Note 12.
Long-Lived Assets, Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Long-Lived and Amortizable Intangible Assets
We periodically review our long-lived and amortizable intangible assets, the net value of which was $7.0 billion and $6.4 billion as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for impairment and to assess whether significant events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Such circumstances may include a significant decrease in the market price of an asset, a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used or in its physical condition or history of operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the asset. Impairment losses could occur when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the anticipated future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. The amount of the impairment loss to be recorded, if any, is calculated as the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its estimated fair value.
We use the straight-line method to recognize amortization expense related to our amortizable intangible assets, including our customer relationships. We consider various factors when determining the appropriate method of amortization for our customer relationships, including projected sales data, customer attrition rates and length of key customer relationships.
Globally, we have a broad customer base. Our retention rate of significant customers has aligned with our acquisition assumptions, including the customer base acquired in our recent Nalco and Champion transactions, which make up the majority of our unamortized customer relationships. Our historical retention rate, coupled with our consistent track record of keeping long-term relationships with our customers, supports our expectation of consistent sales generation for the foreseeable future from the acquired customer base. Our customer retention rate and history of maintaining long-term relationships with our significant customers are not expected to change in the future. Additionally, other less certain post-acquisition operational assumptions related to future capital investments and working capital, as well as the impact of discount rate assumptions, induce variability and uncertainty in the pattern of economic benefits of our acquired customer relationships. If our customer retention rate or other post-acquisition operational activities changed materially, we would evaluate the financial impact and any corresponding triggers which could result in an acceleration of amortization or impairment of our customer relationship intangible assets.
In addition, we periodically reassess the estimated remaining useful lives of our long-lived and amortizable intangible assets. Changes to estimated useful lives would impact the amount of depreciation and amortization expense recorded in earnings. We have experienced no significant changes in the carrying value or estimated remaining useful lives of our long-lived or amortizable intangible assets.
Goodwill and Indefinite Life Intangible Assets
We had total goodwill of $7.2 billion and $6.4 billion as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We test our goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis during the second quarter. Our reporting units are aligned with our eleven operating segments (ten subsequent to the divestiture of the Equipment Care business).
For our 2017 impairment assessment, we completed our assessment for goodwill impairment across our eleven reporting units through a quantitative analysis, utilizing a discounted cash flow approach. The two-step quantitative process involved comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to the reporting unit’s carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not to be impaired, and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test would be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss to be recorded, if any. Our goodwill impairment assessment for 2017 indicated the estimated fair value of each of our reporting units exceeded the unit’s carrying amount by a significant margin. We will continue to assess the need to test our reporting units for impairment during interim periods between our scheduled annual assessments. In the fourth quarter of 2017 we sold the Equipment Care business, which was one of our reporting units and operating segments, and the goodwill associated with Equipment Care was disposed of upon sale. No goodwill impairment was realized as a result of the sale, and no other events occurred during the second half of 2017 indicating a need to update our conclusions reached during the second quarter of 2017.
As part of the Nalco merger, we added the “Nalco” trade name as an indefinite life intangible asset, the total value of which was $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The carrying value of the indefinite life trade name was subject to annual impairment testing, using a relief from royalty assessment method, during the second quarter of 2017. Based on this testing, no adjustment to the carrying value was necessary. Additionally, no events during the second half of 2017 indicated a need to update our conclusions reached during the second quarter of 2017.
31
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(millions) |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||||||||
Reported GAAP net sales |
|
|
$13,838.3 |
|
|
|
$13,152.8 |
|
|
|
$13,545.1 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
(3) |
% |
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
(192.1) |
|
|
|
(148.0) |
|
|
|
(566.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP fixed currency sales |
|
|
$13,646.2 |
|
|
|
$13,004.8 |
|
|
|
$12,978.5 |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The percentage components of the year-over-year sales change are shown below:
(percent) |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
Volume |
|
3% |
|
(1)% |
Price changes |
|
1 |
|
0 |
Acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales change |
|
4 |
|
(1) |
Acquisitions & divestitures |
|
1 |
|
1 |
Fixed currency sales change |
|
5 |
|
0 |
Foreign currency translation |
|
0 |
|
(3) |
Reported GAAP net sales change |
|
5% |
|
(3)% |
Cost of Sales (“COS”) and Gross Profit Margin (“Gross Margin”)
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|||
(millions/percent) |
|
COS |
|
Margin |
|
COS |
|
Margin |
|
COS |
|
Margin |
|||||||||
Reported GAAP COS and gross margin |
|
|
$7,405.1 |
|
|
46.5 |
% |
|
|
$6,898.9 |
|
|
47.5 |
% |
|
|
$7,223.5 |
|
|
46.7 |
% |
Special (gains) and charges |
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
66.0 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
80.6 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
Non-GAAP adjusted COS and gross margin |
|
|
$7,361.1 |
|
|
46.8 |
% |
|
|
$6,832.9 |
|
|
48.0 |
% |
|
|
$7,142.9 |
|
|
47.3 |
% |
Our COS values and corresponding gross margin are shown in the previous table. Our gross margin is defined as sales less cost of sales divided by sales.
Our reported gross margin was 46.5%, 47.5%, and 46.7% for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Our 2017, 2016 and 2015 reported gross margins were negatively impacted by special (gains) and charges of $44.0 million, $66.0 million, and $80.6 million, respectively. Special (gains) and charges items impacting COS are shown within the “Special (Gains) and Charges” table on page 33.
Excluding the impact of special (gains) and charges, our 2017 adjusted gross margin was 46.8% compared against a 2016 adjusted gross margin of 48.0%. The decrease was driven primarily by higher delivered product costs and an increase in Global Energy (which on average has a lower gross margin), which more than offset pricing and cost savings.
Excluding the impact of special (gains) and charges, our adjusted gross margin was 48.0% and 47.3% for 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase was driven primarily by lower delivered product costs, cost efficiencies and the impact of the decline in Global Energy, which on average has a lower gross margin.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”)
(percent) |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|||
SG&A Ratio |
|
31.9 |
% |
|
32.7 |
% |
|
32.1 |
% |
The decreased SG&A ratio (SG&A expenses as a percentage of reported net sales) comparing 2017 against 2016 was driven primarily by sales volume leverage and cost savings, which more than offset investments in the business and the impact of acquisitions.
The increased SG&A ratio (SG&A expenses as a percentage of reported net sales) comparing 2016 against 2015 was driven primarily by the impact of acquisitions, investments in the business, and the decline in Global Energy, which on average has a lower SG&A ratio.
32