El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2021 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)


☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2021


☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-36556

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		20-3563182
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3535 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100, Costa Mesa, California		92626
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(714) 599-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share	LOCO	The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer	☐	Accelerated Filer	☒

Non-accelerated Filer	☐	Smaller Reporting Company	☐

		Emerging Growth Company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

As of July 30, 2021, there were 36,637,761 shares of the issuer’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents


Table of Contents		Page

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Item 1. Financial Statements.		3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)		6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)		8
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		9
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.		30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.		46
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.		47

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION		48
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.		48
Item 1A. Risk Factors.		48
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.		48
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.		48
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.		48
Item 5. Other Information.		48
Item 6. Exhibits.		49
Signatures		50

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)


	June 30,		December 30,
	2021		2020
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	12,624	$	13,219
Accounts and other receivables, net		10,470		9,963
Inventories		2,027		2,100
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		3,308		3,865
Income tax receivable		507		2,522
Assets held for sale		3,772		-
Total current assets		32,708		31,669
Property and equipment, net		74,215		79,642
Property and equipment held under finance lease, net		1,797		1,661
Property and equipment held under operating leases, net ("ROU asset")		175,020		177,129
Goodwill		248,674		248,674
Trademarks		61,888		61,888
Deferred tax assets		3,047		3,166
Other assets		1,578		1,392
Total assets	$	598,927	$	605,221
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Current portion of obligations under finance leases	$	147	$	70
Current portion of obligations under operating leases		19,572		19,907
Accounts payable		6,119		7,472
Accrued salaries and vacation		10,446		10,166
Accrued insurance		10,777		10,416
Accrued interest		85		89
Current portion of income tax receivable agreement payable		1,597		1,577
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities		24,655		16,715
Total current liabilities		73,398		66,412
Revolver loan		40,000		62,800
Obligations under finance leases, net of current portion		1,780		1,692
Obligations under operating leases, net of current portion		175,192		178,658
Deferred taxes		6,073		5,227
Income tax receivable agreement payable, net of current portion		1,492		1,562
Other noncurrent liabilities		8,606		11,292
Total liabilities		306,541		327,643
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding		—		—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 36,637,761 and 36,423,505 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2021 and December 30, 2020, respectively		367		364
Additional paid-in-capital		341,358		339,561
Accumulated deficit		(48,732)		(61,514)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(607)		(833)
Total stockholders’ equity		292,386		277,578
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	598,927	$	605,221

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)



	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020		June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Revenue
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	106,970	$	87,707	$	201,131	$	180,341
Franchise revenue		8,389		6,719		16,001		13,781
Franchise advertising fee revenue		6,626		5,178		12,574		10,645
Total revenue		121,985		99,604		229,706		204,767
Cost of operations
Food and paper cost		27,882		22,873		52,273		48,435
Labor and related expenses		31,526		25,759		62,258		54,452
Occupancy and other operating expenses		25,336		21,922		49,180		44,031
Company restaurant expenses		84,744		70,554		163,711		146,918
General and administrative expenses		10,523		10,465		20,997		19,796
Franchise expenses		8,161		6,627		15,912		13,538
Depreciation and amortization		3,917		4,168		7,855		8,537
Loss on disposal of assets		85		27		111		127
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expenses and other insurance claims		—		(123)		—		(123)
Loss on assets held for sale		1,524		—		1,524		—
Impairment and closed-store reserves		360		437		924		2,839
Total expenses		109,314		92,155		211,034		191,632
Income from operations		12,671		7,449		18,672		13,135
Interest expense, net		433		908		950		1,813
Income tax receivable agreement expense (income)		27		290		(50)		170
Income before provision for income taxes		12,211		6,251		17,772		11,152
Provision for income taxes		3,393		752		4,990		2,053
Net income	$	8,818	$	5,499	$	12,782	$	9,099
Net income per share
Basic	$	0.25	$	0.16	$	0.36	$	0.26
Diluted	$	0.24	$	0.16	$	0.35	$	0.26
Weighted-average shares used in computing net income per share
Basic		35,927,781		34,836,410		35,861,493		34,747,785
Diluted		36,416,686		35,410,198		36,423,394		35,382,607

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands)


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020		June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Net income	$	8,818	$	5,499	$	12,782	$	9,099
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Changes in derivative instruments
Unrealized net (losses) gains arising during the period from interest rate swap		(2)		(296)		76		(1,755)
Reclassifications of losses into net income		119		81		234		42
Income tax (expense) benefit		(32)		58		(84)		461
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes		85		(157)		226		(1,252)
Comprehensive income	$	8,903	$	5,342	$	13,008	$	7,847

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)


	Thirteen Weeks Ended June 30, 2021
								Accumulated
				Additional				Other		Total
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		(Loss) Income		Equity
Balance, March 31, 2021	36,478,683	$	365	$	340,739	$	(57,550)	$	(692)	$	282,862
Stock-based compensation	—		—		1,041		—		—		1,041
Issuance of common stock related to restricted stock	206,098		2		(2)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	30,125		—		240		—		—		240
Shares repurchased for employee tax withholdings	(37,938)		—		(660)		—		—		(660)
Forfeiture of common stock related to restricted shares	(39,207)		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax	—		—		—		—		85		85
Net income	—		—		—		8,818		—		8,818
Balance, June 30, 2021	36,637,761	$	367	$	341,358	$	(48,732)	$	(607)	$	292,386

	Thirteen Weeks Ended June 24, 2020
								Accumulated
				Additional				Other		Total
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Loss		Equity
Balance, March 25, 2020	35,089,983	$	351	$	331,484	$	(82,388)	$	(842)		248,605
Stock-based compensation	—		—		727		—		—		727
Issuance of common stock related to restricted shares	436,263		4		(4)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	372,556		4		2,161		—		—		2,165
Shares repurchased for employee tax withholdings	(20,193)		—		(280)		—		—		(280)
Forfeiture of common stock related to restricted shares	(24,487)		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax	—		—		—		—		(157)		(157)
Net income	—		—		—		5,499		—		5,499
Balance, June 24, 2020	35,854,122	$	359	$	334,088	$	(76,889)	$	(999)	$	256,559

Table of Contents


	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 30, 2021
								Accumulated
				Additional				Other		Total
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		(Loss) Income		Equity
Balance, December 30, 2020	36,423,505	$	364	$	339,561	$	(61,514)	$	(833)	$	277,578
Stock-based compensation	—		—		1,894		—		—		1,894
Issuance of common stock related to restricted stock	206,098		2		(2)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	91,544		1		565		—		—		566
Shares repurchased for employee tax withholdings	(37,938)		—		(660)		—		—		(660)
Forfeiture of common stock related to restricted shares	(45,448)		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax	—		—		—		—		226		226
Net income	—		—		—		12,782		—		12,782
Balance, June 30, 2021	36,637,761	$	367	$	341,358	$	(48,732)	$	(607)	$	292,386

	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 24, 2020
								Accumulated
				Additional				Other		Total
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		(Loss) Income		Equity
Balance, December 25, 2019	35,126,582	$	351	$	330,950	$	(85,988)	$	253	$	245,566
Stock-based compensation	—		—		1,261		—		—		1,261
Issuance of common stock related to restricted shares	436,263		4		(4)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	372,556		4		2,161		—		—		2,165
Shares repurchased for employee tax withholdings	(20,193)		—		(280)		—		—		(280)
Forfeiture of common stock related to restricted shares	(61,086)		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax	—		—		—		—		(1,252)		(1,252)
Net income	—		—		—		9,099		—		9,099
Balance, June 24, 2020	35,854,122	$	359	$	334,088	$	(76,889)	$	(999)	$	256,559

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands)



	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	12,782	$	9,099
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		7,855		8,537
Stock-based compensation expense		1,894		1,261
Income tax receivable agreement expense (income)		(50)		170
Loss on assets held for sale		1,524		—
Loss on disposal of assets		111		127
Impairment of property and equipment		666		1,972
Amortization of deferred financing costs		126		126
Deferred income taxes, net		881		(363)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts and other receivables		(507)		(7,610)
Inventories		73		55
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		558		3,021
Income taxes receivable/payable		2,014		—
Other assets		(312)		339
Accounts payable		(557)		3,610
Accrued salaries and vacation		279		(2,342)
Accrued insurance		362		698
Payment related to tax receivable agreement		—		2,069
Other accrued expenses and liabilities		(1,075)		(9,687)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		26,624		11,082
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from deposit for disposition of restaurants		4,556		—
Purchase of property and equipment		(8,828)		(2,479)
Net cash flows used in investing activities		(4,272)		(2,479)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings on revolver and swingline loans		—		52,500
Payments on revolver and swingline loan		(22,800)		(10,700)
Minimum tax withholdings related to net share settlements		(660)		(280)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options, net of expenses		566		2,165
Payment of obligations under finance leases		(53)		(16)
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities		(22,947)		43,669
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(595)		52,272
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		13,219		8,070
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	12,624	$	60,342



	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Supplemental cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	598	$	1,738
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	2,094	$	434
Unpaid purchases of property and equipment	$	1,038	$	846

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Overview

El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) is a Delaware corporation headquartered in Costa Mesa, California. Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as “we,” “us” or the “Company.” The Company’s activities are conducted principally through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, El Pollo Loco, Inc. (“EPL”), which develops, franchises, licenses, and operates quick-service restaurants under the name El Pollo Loco® and operates under one operating segment. At June 30, 2021, the Company operated 198 and franchised 282 El Pollo Loco restaurants.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for annual reports. This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2020.

The Company uses a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Wednesday of the calendar year. In a 52-week fiscal year, each quarter includes 13 weeks of operations; in a 53-week fiscal year, the first, second and third quarters each include 13 weeks of operations, and the fourth quarter includes 14 weeks of operations. Every six or seven years, a 53-week fiscal year occurs. Fiscal 2021 is a 52-week year ending on December 29, 2021, and fiscal 2020 was a 53-week year ended on December 30, 2020. Revenues, expenses, and other financial and operational figures may be elevated in a 53-week year.

Holdings has no material assets or operations. Holdings and Holdings’ direct subsidiary, EPL Intermediate, Inc. (“Intermediate”), guarantee EPL’s 2018 Revolver (as defined below) on a full and unconditional basis (see Note 4, “Long-Term Debt”), and Intermediate has no subsidiaries other than EPL. EPL is a separate and distinct legal entity and has no obligation to make funds available to Intermediate. EPL and Intermediate may pay dividends to Intermediate and to Holdings, respectively, subject to the terms of the 2018 Revolver.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and revenue and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. The Company’s significant estimates include estimates for impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment, insurance reserves, lease accounting matters, stock-based compensation, income tax receivable agreement liability, contingent liabilities and income tax valuation allowances.

Table of Contents

COVID-19

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, the Company temporarily closed 5 and 45 restaurants, respectively, of which all have reopened as of June 30, 2021. Similarly, during both thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, certain of the Company’s franchisees temporarily closed 27 restaurants, all of which have reopened as of June 30, 2021. For both franchise-operated and company-operated restaurants, this represents total temporary closures and may include more than one closure for the same restaurant. These closures typically lasted from one to three days. As of June 30, 2021, the Company had not permanently closed any restaurants due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, the Company incurred $0.2 million and $3.0 million, respectively, in COVID-19 related expenses, primarily due to leaves of absence and overtime pay. During both thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company incurred $1.1 million in COVID-19 related expenses, primarily due to leaves of absence and overtime pay.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent to June 30, 2021, the Company completed the sale of eight restaurants in the Sacramento area to an existing franchisee. See "Assets Held For Sale" below for further details related to the accounting impact as of and for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021.

As of August 5, 2021, all company-operated and franchise locations remained open.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events that have occurred after June 30, 2021, and determined that there were no other events or transactions occurring during this reporting period that require recognition or disclosure in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Liquidity

The Company’s principal liquidity and capital requirements are new restaurants, existing restaurant capital investments (remodels and maintenance), interest payments on our debt, lease obligations and working capital and general corporate needs. At June 30, 2021, the Company’s total debt was $40.0 million. The Company’s ability to make payments on its indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures depends on available cash and its ability to generate adequate cash flows in the future, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors that are beyond the Company’s control. Based on current operations, the Company believes that its cash flow from operations and available cash of $12.6 million at June 30, 2021 will be adequate to meet the Company’s liquidity needs for the next twelve months from the date of filing of these condensed consolidated financial statements. However, depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s financial performance and liquidity could be further impacted and could impact the Company’s ability to meet certain covenants required in its 2018 Credit Agreement (as defined below), specifically the lease-adjusted coverage ratio and fixed-charge coverage ratio.

Table of Contents

Assets Held For Sale

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, the Company agreed in principle to sell eight restaurants within the Sacramento area to an existing franchisee. Assets are classified as held for sale if they meet the criteria outlined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360, Property, Plant and Equipment. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the net assets of the eight restaurants were recorded at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. The Company classified $3.8 million of assets as held for sale, consisting of leasehold improvements and other property equipment, as of June 30, 2021, and recognized a loss on held for sale assets of $1.5 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021. Prior to June 30, 2021, we received $4.6 million of cash primarily representing the purchase price of the transaction. The funds were recorded within our cash and cash equivalents and other accrued expenses and current liabilities within our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2021, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2021-01, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope” which clarifies the FASB’s recent rate reform guidance in Topic 848, Reference Rate Reform, that optional expedients and exceptions therein for contract modification and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the discontinuation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and the use of new interest rate benchmarks. ASU 2021-01 is effective immediately. Entities may choose to apply the amendments retrospectively as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively to new modifications from any date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to January 7, 2021, up to the date that financial statements are available to be issued. The Company adopted this ASU on January 7, 2021. The adoption of ASU 2021-01 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-10, “Codification Improvements,” which improve the consistency of the codification by including all disclosure guidance in the appropriate Disclosure Section (Section 50). ASU 2020-10 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, and for interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company adopted this ASU during the first quarter of 2021. The adoption of ASU 2020-10 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes”, which modifies Topic 740 to simplify the accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, and for the interim periods therein. The Company adopted this ASU during the first quarter of 2021. The adoption of ASU 2019-12 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Concentration of Risk

Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, these balances may exceed federally-insured limits. The Company has never experienced any losses related to these balances.

The Company had no suppliers to whom amounts due totaled greater than 10% of the Company’s accounts payable at June 30, 2021. At December 30, 2020, the Company had two suppliers to whom amounts due totaled 24.2% and 11.4% of the Company’s accounts payable. Purchases from the Company’s largest supplier totaled 26.2% and 26.6% of total expenses for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, respectively, and 26.4% and 27.0% of total expenses for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively.

Company-operated and franchised restaurants in the greater Los Angeles area generated, in the aggregate, approximately 70.6% and 70.4% of total revenue for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, respectively, and 71.1% and 71.7% twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively.

Goodwill and Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets

The Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of trademarks. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of net identified assets acquired in business combinations accounted for under the purchase method. The Company

Table of Contents

does not amortize its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Goodwill resulted from the acquisition of certain franchise locations.

Upon the sale or closure of a restaurant, the Company evaluates whether there is a decrement of goodwill. The amount of goodwill included in the cost basis of the asset sold is determined based on the relative fair value of the portion of the reporting unit disposed of compared to the fair value of the reporting unit retained.

The Company performs an annual impairment test for goodwill during the fourth fiscal quarter of each year, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise.

The Company reviews goodwill for impairment utilizing either a qualitative assessment or a fair value test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the Company decides that it is appropriate to perform a qualitative assessment and concludes that the fair value of a reporting unit more likely than not exceeds its carrying value, no further evaluation is necessary. If the Company performs the fair value test, the Company will compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company will recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized cannot exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

The Company performs an annual impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth fiscal quarter of each year, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. An impairment test consists of either a qualitative assessment or a comparison of the fair value of an intangible asset with its carrying amount. The excess of the carrying amount of an intangible asset over its fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.

The assumptions used in the estimate of fair value are generally consistent with the past performance of the Company’s reporting segment and are also consistent with the projections and assumptions that are used in current operating plans. These assumptions are subject to change as a result of changing economic and competitive conditions.

The Company determined that there were no indicators of potential impairment of its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021. Accordingly, the Company did not record any impairment to its goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021. The ultimate severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown, and therefore, it is possible that impairments could be identified in future periods, and such amounts could be material.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

●

Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

●

Level 2: Observable prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs or significant value drivers are observable.

●

Level 3: Unobservable inputs used when little or no market data is available.

During fiscal 2019, the Company entered into an interest rate swap, which is required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value was determined based on Level 2 inputs, which include valuation models, as reported by the Company’s counterparty. These valuation models use a discounted cash flow analysis on the cash flows of the derivative based on the terms of the contract and the forward yield curves adjusted for the Company’s credit risk. The

Table of Contents

key inputs for the valuation models are observable market prices, discount rates, and forward yield curves. See Note 4, “Long-Term Debt” for further discussion regarding our interest rate swaps.

The following table presents fair value for the interest rate swap at June 30, 2021 (in thousands):


			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Other non-current liabilities - Interest rate swap	$	830	$	—	$	830	$	—

The following table presents fair value for the interest rate swap at December 30, 2020 (in thousands):


			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Other non-current liabilities - Interest rate swap	$	1,139	$	—	$	1,139	$	—

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. In other words, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (e.g., when there is evidence of impairment).

The following non-financial instruments were measured at fair value, on a nonrecurring basis, as of and for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, reflecting certain property and equipment assets and right-of-use (“ROU”) assets for which certain assets were classified as held for sale, and an impairment loss was recognized during the corresponding periods, as discussed under Note 2, “Property and Equipment” and immediately below under “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and ROU Assets” (in thousands):


									Thirteen Weeks		Twenty-Six Weeks
			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2021 Using						Ended June 30, 2021		Ended June 30, 2021
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Impairment Losses		Impairment Losses
Certain property and equipment, net	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	18	$	259
Certain property and equipment, held for sale		3,772		—		—		3,772		1,524		1,524
Certain ROU assets, net	$	1,898	$	—	$	—	$	1,898	$	344	$	407

The following non-financial instruments were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of and for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, reflecting certain property and equipment assets and ROU assets for which an impairment loss was recognized during the corresponding periods, as discussed immediately below under “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and ROU Assets” (in thousands):


									Thirteen Weeks		Twenty-Six Weeks
			Fair Value Measurements at June 24, 2020 Using						Ended June 24, 2020		Ended June 24, 2020
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Impairment Losses		Impairment Losses
Certain property and equipment, net	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	52	$	1,429
Certain ROU assets, net	$	918	$	—	$	—	$	918	$	—	$	543

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and ROU Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived and ROU assets for impairment on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of certain long-lived and ROU assets may not be recoverable. The Company considers a triggering event related to long-lived assets or ROU assets in a net asset position to have occurred related to a specific restaurant if the restaurant’s cash flows for the last twelve months are less than a minimum threshold or if consistent levels of undiscounted cash flows for the remaining lease period are less than the carrying value of the restaurant’s assets. Additionally, the Company considers a triggering event related to ROU assets to have occurred related to a specific lease if the location has been subleased and future estimated sublease income is less than lease payments under the head lease. If the Company concludes that the carrying value of certain long-lived and ROU assets will not be recovered based on expected undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment loss is recorded to reduce the long-lived or ROU assets to their estimated fair value. The fair value is measured on a nonrecurring basis

Table of Contents

using unobservable (Level 3) inputs. There is uncertainty in the projected undiscounted future cash flows used in the Company’s impairment review analysis, which requires the use of estimates and assumptions. If actual performance does not achieve the projections, or if the assumptions used change in the future, the Company may be required to recognize impairment charges in future periods, and such charges could be material. The Company determined that triggering events occurred for certain restaurants during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 that required an impairment review of certain of the Company’s long-lived and ROU assets. Based on the results of the analysis, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.4 million and $0.7 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, respectively, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of one restaurant in Texas that closed in 2019, the carrying value of the ROU assets of one restaurant in California and the long-lived assets of three restaurants in California.

The Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $0.1 million and $2.0 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of one restaurant in Texas and the long-lived assets of three restaurants in California. Given the inherent uncertainty in projecting results for newer restaurants in newer markets, as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company is monitoring the recoverability of the carrying value of the assets of several restaurants on an ongoing basis. For these restaurants, if expected performance is not realized, an impairment charge may be recognized in future periods, and such charge could be material.

Closed-Store Reserves

When a restaurant is closed, the Company will evaluate the ROU asset for impairment, based on anticipated sublease recoveries. The remaining value of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis, with the expense recognized in closed-store reserve expense. Additionally, any property tax and common area maintenance (“CAM”) payments relating to closed restaurants are included within closed-store expense. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, the Company recognized less than $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of closed-store reserve expense related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for its closed locations. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company recognized $0.4 million and $0.9 million of closed-store reserve expense, respectively, primarily related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for its closed locations.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses an interest rate swap, a derivative instrument, to hedge interest rate risk and not for trading purposes. The derivative contract is entered into with a financial institution.

The Company records the derivative instrument on its condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The derivative instrument qualifies as a hedging instrument in a qualifying cash flow hedge relationship, and the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (“AOCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. For any derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss will be recognized in earnings immediately. If a derivative previously designated as a hedge is terminated, or no longer meets the qualifications for hedge accounting, any balances in AOCI will be reclassified to earnings immediately.

As a result of the use of an interest rate swap, the Company is exposed to risk that the counterparty will fail to meet their contractual obligations. To mitigate the counterparty credit risk, the Company will only enter into contracts with major financial institutions, based upon their credit ratings and other factors, and will continue to assess the creditworthiness of the counterparty. As of June 30, 2021, the counterparty to the Company’s interest rate swap has performed in accordance with its contractual obligation.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes, income taxes payable and deferred income taxes is determined using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. On a periodic basis, the Company assesses the probability that its net deferred tax assets, if any, will be recovered. If, after evaluating all of the positive and negative evidence, a conclusion is

Table of Contents

made that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be recovered, a valuation allowance is provided by charging to tax expense a reserve for the portion of deferred tax assets which are not expected to be realized.

The Company reviews its filing positions for all open tax years in all U.S. federal and state jurisdictions where the Company is required to file.

When there are uncertainties related to potential income tax benefits, in order to qualify for recognition, the position the Company takes has to have at least a “more likely than not” chance of being sustained (based on the position’s technical merits) upon challenge by the respective authorities. The term “more likely than not” means a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Otherwise, the Company may not recognize any of the potential tax benefit associated with the position. The Company recognizes a benefit for a tax position that meets the “more likely than not” criterion at the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon its effective resolution. Unrecognized tax benefits involve management’s judgment regarding the likelihood of the benefit being sustained. The final resolution of uncertain tax positions could result in adjustments to recorded amounts and may affect the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company had no accrual for interest or penalties at June 30, 2021 or at December 30, 2020. During fiscal 2020 the Company recognized interest of $0.1 million related to the Notice of Proposed Adjustment (“NOPA”), discussed below. The Company did not recognize interest or penalties during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, since there were no material unrecognized tax benefits. Management believes no significant changes to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will occur within the next twelve months.

On July 30, 2014, the Company entered into the income tax receivable agreement (the “TRA”), which calls for the Company to pay to its pre-initial public offering (“IPO”) stockholders 85% of the savings in cash that the Company realizes in its income taxes as a result of utilizing its net operating losses (“NOLs”) and other tax attributes attributable to preceding periods. For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, the Company recorded income tax receivable agreement expense of less than $0.1 million and income tax receivable agreement income of less than $0.1 million, respectively, and for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company recorded income tax receivable agreement expense of $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to the amortization of interest expense related to the total expected TRA payments and changes in estimates for actual tax returns filed and future forecasted taxable income.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) was signed into a law a stimulus package, which contains several tax provisions and deferral of employer Social Security taxes that are otherwise owed for wage payments. The tax provisions include a correction of a previous drafting error related to quality improvement property (“QIP”) and immediate refundability of all remaining alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) credits. The new provisions did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

During fiscal 2020, the Company received a NOPA for the years ended December 27, 2017 and December 28, 2016, related to the Company’s methodology regarding its ordering of utilization of AMT NOLs. This resulted in a payment of $0.4 million, and the audit is closed. As a result of the CARES Act, this amount was immediately refundable upon filing of a Form 1139, which the Company filed during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 and received a refund totaling $0.5 million.

2. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The costs and related accumulated depreciation and amortization of major classes of property and equipment are as follows (in thousands):


	June 30, 2021		December 30, 2020
Land	$	12,323	$	12,323
Buildings and improvements		143,229		147,939
Other property and equipment		77,554		77,177
Construction in progress		2,171		3,567
		235,277		241,006

Table of Contents

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization			(161,062)			(161,364)
		$	74,215		$	79,642

Depreciation expense was $3.9 million and $4.2 million for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2021 and June 24, 2020, respectively, and $7.9 million and $8.5 million for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 and June 24, 2020, respectively.

Based on the Company’s review of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of less than $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, respectively, primarily related to the carrying value of the assets of three restaurants in California. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively, primarily related to the carrying value of the assets of three restaurants in California. Depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s financial performance could be further impacted and it is possible that material impairments could be identified in future periods. See Note 1, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and ROU Assets” for additional information.

Assets are classified as held for sale if they meet the criteria outlined in ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the net assets were recorded at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. The Company classified $3.8 million of assets as held for sale as of June30, 2021, and recognized a loss on held for sale assets of $1.5 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021. Prior to June 30, 2021, the Company received $4.6 million of cash primarily representing the purchase price of the transaction. The funds were recorded within the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and other accrued expenses and current liabilities within the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The eight restaurants were sold subsequent to June 30, 2021.

3. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

At June 30, 2021, options to purchase 1,153,946 shares of common stock were outstanding, including 702,831 vested and 451,115 unvested. Unvested options vest over time; however, upon a change in control, the Board of Directors may accelerate vesting. At June 30, 2021, 243,950 premium options, which are options granted above the stock price at date of grant, remained outstanding. A summary of stock option activity as of June 30, 2021 and changes during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 is as follows:


				Weighted-Average		Aggregate
		Weighted-Average		Contractual Life		Intrinsic Value
	Shares	Exercise Price		Life (Years)		(in thousands)
Outstanding - December 30, 2020	1,030,866	$	9.82
Grants	256,172		17.55
Exercised	(91,544)		6.19
Forfeited, cancelled or expired	(41,548)	$	15.99
Outstanding - June 30, 2021	1,153,946	$	11.60		6.16	$	7,775
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2021	1,146,295	$	11.57		6.14	$	7,754
Exercisable at June 30, 2021	702,831	$	9.78		4.54	$	6,002

The fair value of each stock option was estimated on the grant date using an exercise price of the closing stock price on the day prior to date of grant and the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:


	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Expected volatility	46.9	%	—	%
Risk-free interest rate	1.1	%	—	%
Expected term (years)	6.25		—
Expected dividends	—		—

At June 30, 2021, the Company had total unrecognized compensation expense of $2.4 million related to unvested stock options, which it expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 3.21 years.

Table of Contents

A summary of restricted share activity as of June 30, 2021 and changes during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 is as follows:


		Weighted-Average
	Shares	Fair Value
Unvested shares at December 30, 2020	742,404	$	11.68
Granted	182,059	$	17.55
Released	(202,047)	$	12.06
Forfeited, cancelled, or expired	(45,448)	$	13.84
Unvested shares at June 30, 2021	676,968	$	13.00

Unvested shares at June 30, 2021 included 616,871 unvested restricted shares, 36,058 unvested performance stock units and 24,039 unvested restricted units.

At June 30, 2021, the Company had unrecognized compensation expense of $7.4 million related to unvested restricted shares, which it expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 2.87 years, unrecognized compensation expense of $0.1 million related to performance stock units, which it expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.86 years, and unrecognized compensation expense of $0.2 million related to unvested restricted units, which it expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 0.86 years.

Total stock-based compensation expense was $1.0 million and $1.9 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, respectively, and $0.7 million and $1.3 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively.

4. LONG-TERM DEBT

On July 13, 2018, the Company refinanced a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., initially entered into on December 11, 2014 (the “2014 Revolver”), pursuant to a credit agreement (the “2018 Credit Agreement”) among EPL, as borrower, and the Company and Intermediate, as guarantors, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swingline lender, and letter of credit issuer, the lenders party thereto, and the other parties thereto, which provides for a $150.0 million five-year senior secured revolving credit facility (the “2018 Revolver”). The 2018 Revolver includes a sub limit of $15.0 million for letters of credit and a sub limit of $15.0 million for swingline loans. The 2018 Revolver and 2018 Credit Agreement will mature on July 13, 2023. The obligations under the 2018 Credit Agreement and related loan documents are guaranteed by the Company and Intermediate. The obligations of the Company, EPL and Intermediate under the 2018 Credit Agreement and related loan documents are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of their respective assets.

Under the 2018 Revolver, Holdings may not make certain payments such as cash dividends, except that it may, inter alia, (i) pay up to $1.0 million per year to repurchase or redeem qualified equity interests of Holdings held by past or present officers, directors, or employees (or their estates) of the Company upon death, disability, or termination of employment, (ii) pay under its TRA, and (iii) so long as no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing, (a) make non-cash repurchases of equity interests in connection with the exercise of stock options by directors, officers and management, provided that those equity interests represent a portion of the consideration of the exercise price of those stock options, (b) pay up to $0.5 million in any 12 month consecutive period to redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire equity interests of any subsidiary that is not a wholly-owned subsidiary from any holder of equity interest in such subsidiary, (c) pay up to $2.5 million per year pursuant to stock option plans, employment agreements, or incentive plans, (d) make up to $5.0 million in other restricted payments per year, and (e) make other restricted payments, subject to its compliance, on a pro forma basis, with (x) a lease-adjusted consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 4.25 times and (y) the financial covenants applicable to the 2018 Revolver.

Borrowings under the 2018 Credit Agreement (other than any swingline loans) bear interest, at the borrower’s option, at rates based upon either LIBOR or a base rate, plus, for each rate, a margin determined in accordance with a lease-adjusted consolidated leverage ratio-based pricing grid. The base rate is calculated as the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the published Bank of America prime rate, or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00%. For LIBOR loans, the margin is in the range of 1.25% to 2.25%, and for base rate loans the margin is in a range of 0.25% to 1.25%. Borrowings under the 2018 Revolver may be repaid and reborrowed. The interest rate range was 1.35% to 1.36% and 1.35% to 1.65% for

Table of Contents

the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 respectively, and 1.67% to 3.11% and 1.67% to 3.29% for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively.

The 2018 Credit Agreement contains certain financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants as of June 30, 2021.

At June 30, 2021, $8.4 million of letters of credit and $40.0 million in borrowings under the 2018 Revolver were outstanding. The Company had $101.6 million in borrowing availability under the 2018 Revolver at June 30, 2021.

Maturities

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, the Company elected to pay down $13.8 million and $22.8 million, respectively, on its 2018 Revolver. During the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company elected to pay down $2.7 million on its 2018 Revolver. During the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company borrowed $41.8 million, net of pay downs of $10.7 million on the Company’s 2018 Revolver, primarily as a precautionary measure to bolster its existing cash position, related to the uncertainty regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to fund settlement payments. There are no required principal payments prior to maturity for the 2018 Revolver.

Interest Rate Swap

During the year ended December 25, 2019, the Company entered into a variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $40.0 million that matures in June 2023. The objective of the interest rate swap was to reduce the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk for a portion of its variable-rate interest payments on its borrowings under the 2018 Revolver. Under the terms of the swap agreement, the variable LIBOR-based component of interest payments was converted to a fixed rate of 1.31%, plus applicable margin, which was 1.5% for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021. The interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge, as the changes in the future cash flows of the swap were expected to offset changes in expected future interest payments on the related variable-rate debt, in accordance with ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging.”

The changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap are not included in earnings, but are included in other comprehensive (loss) income (“OCI”). These changes in fair value are subsequently reclassified into net earnings as a component of interest expense as the hedged interest payments are made on the variable rate borrowings.

For the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, the swap was a highly effective cash flow hedge.

As of June 30, 2021, the estimated net loss included in AOCI related to the Company’s cash flow hedge that will be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months is $0.5 million, based on current LIBOR interest rates.

The following table shows the financial statement line item and amount of the Company’s cash flow hedge accounting on the condensed consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):


	June 30, 2021				December 30, 2020
	Notional		Fair value		Notional		Fair value
Other liabilities - Interest rate swap	$	40,000	$	830	$	40,000	$	1,139

The following table summarizes the effect of the Company’s cash flow hedge accounting on the condensed consolidated statements of income (in thousands):


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020		June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Interest expense on hedged portion of debt	$	136	$	212	$	336		641
Interest expense on interest rate swap		119		81		234		42
Interest expense on debt and derivatives, net	$	255	$	293	$	570	$	683

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the effect of the Company’s cash flow hedge accounting on AOCI for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 and June 24, 2020 (in thousands):


	Thirteen Weeks Ended								Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
					Loss Reclassified from								Loss Reclassified from
	Net Loss Recognized in OCI				AOCI into Interest expense				Net Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI				AOCI into Interest expense
	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020		June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020		June 30, 2021			June 24, 2020	June 30, 2021			June 24, 2020
Interest rate swap	$	(2)	$	(296)	$	119	$	81	$	76	$	(1,755)	$	234	$	42

See Note 1, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for information about the fair value of the Company’s derivative asset.

5. OTHER ACCRUED EXPENSES AND CURRENT LIABILITIES

Other accrued expenses and current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):


	June 30, 2021		December 30, 2020
Accrued sales and property taxes	$	3,750	$	5,216
Gift card liability		3,667		4,008
Accrued legal settlements and professional fees		546		321
Deferred franchise and development fees		472		503
Current portion of lease payment deferrals		722		1,793
Deposit received on assets held for sale		4,556		—
Employer social security tax deferral		2,426		—
Other		8,516		4,874
Total other accrued expenses and current liabilities	$	24,655	$	16,715

6. OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

Other noncurrent liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):


	June 30, 2021		December 30, 2020
Deferred franchise and development fees	$	5,191	$	5,125
Derivative liability		830		1,139
Employer social security tax deferral		2,426		4,853
Other		159		175
Total other noncurrent liabilities	$	8,606	$	11,292

7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Matters

On or about February 24, 2014, a former employee filed a class action in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange, under the caption Elliott Olvera, et al v. El Pollo Loco, Inc., et al (Case No. 30-2014-00707367-CU-OE-CXC) on behalf of all putative class members (all hourly employees from 2010 to the present) alleging certain violations of California labor laws, including failure to pay overtime compensation, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks, and failure to provide itemized wage statements. The putative lead plaintiff’s requested remedies include compensatory and punitive damages, injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. No specific amount of damages sought was specified in the complaint. The court recently certified two classes of plaintiffs - one class encompasses restaurant employees who were not provided proper rest breaks because they were not allowed to leave the premises during their breaks and the other class encompasses restaurant employees who were required to wait at the restaurant after they finished working for the night until the manager set the alarm for safety purposes. The parties reached a settlement in principle on January 24, 2019 of all claims brought on behalf of the 32,000+ putative class members in Olvera, as well as all claims for failure to pay overtime compensation, failure to

Table of Contents

provide meal periods and rest breaks, and failure to provide itemized wage statements brought in the class actions captioned Martha Perez v. El Pollo Loco, Inc. (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC624001), Maria Vega, et al. v. El Pollo Loco, Inc. (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC649719), and Gonzalez v. El Pollo Loco, Inc. (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC712867). The settlement reached in principle in the Olvera, Perez, Vega, and Gonzalez actions resolves all potential claims from April 12, 2010 through April 1, 2019 that El Pollo Loco restaurant employees may have against El Pollo Loco for failure to pay for all compensation owed, failure to pay overtime compensation, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks and failure to provide itemized wage statements, among other wage and hour related claims. A $16.3 million accrual of an expected settlement amount related to this matter was recorded as of December 26, 2018, and the court formally approved the settlement on January 31, 2020. The settlement payment was made on February 28, 2020. Purported class actions alleging wage and hour violations are commonly filed against California employers. The Company fully expects to have to defend against similar lawsuits in the future.

On or about November 5, 2015, a purported Holdings shareholder filed a derivative complaint on behalf of Holdings in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against certain Holdings officers, directors and Trimaran Pollo Partners, L.L.C., under the caption Armen Galustyan v. Sather, et al. (Case No. 11676-VCL). The derivative complaint alleges that these defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Holdings and were unjustly enriched when they sold shares of Holdings at artificially inflated prices due to alleged misrepresentations and omissions regarding EPL’s comparable store sales in the second quarter of 2015. The Holdings shareholder’s requested remedies include an award of compensatory damages to Holdings, as well as a court order to improve corporate governance by putting forward for stockholder vote certain resolutions for amendments to Holdings’ Bylaws or Certificate of Incorporation. The Holdings shareholder voluntarily dismissed the action on October 7, 2020. A second purported Holdings shareholder filed a derivative complaint on or about September 23, 2016, under the caption Diep v. Sather, CA 12760-VCL in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The Diep action is also purportedly brought on behalf of Holdings, names the same defendants and asserts substantially the same claims on substantially the same alleged facts as does Galustyan. Defendants moved to stay or dismiss the Diep action.

On March 17, 2017, the Delaware court granted in part, and denied in part, the motion to stay the Diep action. The court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. On January 17, 2018, the court entered an order granting the parties’ stipulation staying all proceedings in the Diep action for five months or until the completion of an investigation of the allegations in the action by a special litigation committee of the Holdings board of directors (the “SLC”). On February 13, 2019, after concluding its investigation, the SLC filed a motion to dismiss the Diep action. The SLC filed its investigative report under seal as an exhibit to the motion to dismiss. Following discovery related to the SLC’s motion, on September 25, 2020, the SLC filed a motion to dismiss the Diep action. On April 23, 2021, the court held a hearing on the SLC’s motion to dismiss, and, on May 21, 2021, the Company filed a notice of proposed partial settlement of the Diep action. Subject to the approval of the court, the proposed settlement payment of $625,000 in cash by individual defendants will resolve all claims brought, or that could have been brought, against such defendants. The Company believes that the gain has currently not been realized or considered realizable under ASC 450, "Contingencies", and as of June 30, 2021, no entries have been recorded with regard to this case. On July 30, 2021, the court granted the SLC’s motion to dismiss with respect to the claims asserted against Trimaran Pollo Partners, LLC.

Janice P. Handlers-Bryman and Michael D. Bryman v. El Pollo Loco, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. MC026045) (the “Lancaster Lawsuit”) was filed on February 9, 2016. Existing El Pollo Loco franchisees, Janice P. Handlers-Bryman and Michael D. Bryman, as individuals and in their capacities as trustees of the Handlers Bryman Trust (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed suit against us alleging, among other things, that we “imposed unreasonable time limitations” on their development of additional restaurant locations in Lancaster, California, and that we thereafter developed company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in the “market area” of Plaintiffs’ existing El Pollo Loco restaurant in Lancaster. Plaintiffs asserted claims against us for, among other things, (i) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (ii) intentional interference with prospective business, and (iii) unfair business practices. In addition to an unspecified amount of damages and costs of the lawsuit, Plaintiffs sought reformation of the contract, declaratory relief, disgorgement of alleged revenues and profits, injunctive relief, and a judicial mandate requiring us to either transfer the company-operated locations to Plaintiffs or to continuously disgorge to Plaintiffs the unjust enrichment allegedly obtained by us through the operation of the company-operated restaurants in Lancaster. We denied Plaintiffs’ allegations as the franchise agreement did not grant Plaintiffs any exclusive territorial rights and, instead, expressly reserved for us the right to open and operate - and the right to grant others the right to open and operate - El Pollo Loco restaurants “in the immediate vicinity of or adjacent to” Plaintiffs’ restaurant in Lancaster. On April 24, 2017, four days before the commencement of trial, Plaintiffs filed a voluntary dismissal, without prejudice, of the Lancaster Lawsuit without any payment or other concession by us. The corresponding dismissal was entered by the court

Table of Contents

on April 25, 2017. On May 22, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a motion for relief from the dismissal which was granted by the court on June 29, 2017. The trial in the case was bifurcated between the liability and damages phases. The liability phase commenced on November 16, 2017. The only cause of action that the court allowed to go to the jury was the cause of action for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The court elected not to present the cause of action for intentional interference with prospective business to the jury. (The causes of action for reformation due to mistake and unconscionability, unfair business practices under California Business & Professions Code §17200 et seq., and declaratory relief were not presented to the jury as these types of equitable claims are to be decided by the court as a matter of law.) On December 11, 2017, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiffs finding that the Company breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by (1) constructing the two new company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster, and (2) not offering the two new company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster to Plaintiffs. Because the trial was bifurcated, the December 11, 2017 verdict did not include a determination of damages.

The damages phase of the trial commenced on April 20, 2018. On May 1, 2018, the jury returned a verdict on damages in favor of Plaintiffs in the following amounts: (1) $4,356,600 in “impact damages” arising out of our construction of the two new company-owned El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster, and (2) $4,481,206 in “lost opportunity damages” arising out of our failure to offer the two new company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster to Plaintiffs. On August 1, 2018, the court issued a final judgment and decision on the unfair business practices claim under California Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq. As part of the final judgment, the court found El Pollo Loco liable and issued injunctive relief requiring El Pollo Loco to revise its franchise disclosure document and franchise agreement. The court also awarded Plaintiffs restitution of $4,356,600 for “impact damages” arising out of our construction of the two new company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster. The court, reversing its previous position, held that these damages could be awarded in addition to the “lost opportunity damages” awarded by the jury. Thus, the court entered a total monetary judgment of $8,837,806. There was no ruling on the causes of action for reformation due to mistake and declaratory relief, and on January 27, 2020, the court entered an amended judgment dismissing these claims. The trial court subsequently awarded the Plaintiffs $249,728 in costs and $1,391,703 in attorney fees. Post judgment interest is running at 10% simple interest per year on the total amount of the monetary judgment, costs, and attorney fees.

On August 27, 2018, the Company filed a notice of appeal as to the entire judgment. As required by California law, on or about August 16, 2018, the Company obtained an appeal bond through a Surety company to secure the trial court’s judgment during the pendency of the appeal.

On March 19, 2020, the Surety, One Beacon, from whom the Company procured the appeal bond to secure the judgment against the Company in the matter of Janice P. Handlers-Bryman and Michael D. Bryman v. El Pollo Loco, Inc., issued a collateral demand to the Company. On April 17, 2020, the Company provided to One Beacon a Letter of Credit in the amount of $2,651,342 to satisfy the Surety’s collateral demand. On July 13, 2020, One Beacon agreed to release its collateral demand and returned the Letter of Credit to the Company.

During fiscal 2020, the Company reached an agreement with the Plaintiffs to resolve the lawsuit for a payment by the Company of $2.5 million, which was recorded within operating expenses in the Company’s statement of operations for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2020. Additionally, during fiscal 2020, the matter was formally resolved. On September 2, 2020, the California Court of Appeals entered an order, following a motion for stipulated reversal of the trial court’s judgment jointly filed by the parties, reversing the trial court’s judgment in the case and instructing the trial court to dismiss the matter with prejudice. On September 10, 2020, the trial court entered an order reversing its judgment and dismissing the case with prejudice. The settlement payment of $2.5 million has been made in the third quarter of 2020 and the appeal bond has been released.

The Company is also involved in various other claims such as wage and hour and other legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. The outcomes of these actions are not predictable but the Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these other actions will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. A significant increase in the number of claims, or an increase in amounts owing under successful claims, could materially and adversely affect its business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Table of Contents

Purchasing Commitments

The Company has long-term beverage supply agreements with certain major beverage vendors. Pursuant to the terms of these arrangements, marketing rebates are provided to the Company and its franchisees from the beverage vendors based upon the dollar volume of purchases for system-wide restaurants which will vary according to their demand for beverage syrup and fluctuations in the market rates for beverage syrup. These contracts have terms extending through the end of 2024.

At June 30, 2021, the Company’s total estimated commitment to purchase chicken was $18.1 million.

Contingent Lease Obligations

As a result of assigning the Company’s interest in obligations under real estate leases in connection with the sale of company-operated restaurants to some of the Company’s franchisees, the Company is contingently liable on four lease agreements. These leases have various terms, the latest of which expires in 2036. As of June 30, 2021, the potential amount of undiscounted payments the Company could be required to make in the event of non-payment by the primary lessee was $2.7 million. The present value of these potential payments discounted at the Company’s estimated pre-tax cost of debt at June 30, 2021 was $2.5 million. The Company’s franchisees are primarily liable on the leases. The Company has cross-default provisions with these franchisees that would put them in default of their franchise agreements in the event of non-payment under the leases. The Company believes that these cross-default provisions reduce the risk that payments will be required to be made under these leases. Due to the current uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact it has had on the ability of the Company’s franchisees to make their lease payments, the Company has recorded a $0.1 million liability in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements related to these contingent liabilities.

Employment Agreements

The Company has employment agreements with three of the officers of the Company. These agreements provide for minimum salary levels, possible annual adjustments for cost-of-living changes, and incentive bonuses that are payable under certain business conditions.

Indemnification Agreements

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its current directors and officers. These agreements require the Company to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to the Company and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. The Company also intends to enter into indemnification agreements with future directors and officers.

8. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 and June 24, 2020. Diluted EPS is calculated using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding and potentially dilutive during the period, using the treasury stock method.

Below are basic and diluted EPS data for the periods indicated (in thousands except for share and per share data):



	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020		June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Numerator:
Net income	$	8,818	$	5,499	$	12,782	$	9,099
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic		35,927,781		34,836,410		35,861,493		34,747,785
Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted		36,416,686		35,410,198		36,423,394		35,382,607
Net income per share—basic	$	0.25	$	0.16	$	0.36	$	0.26

Table of Contents

Net income per share—diluted		$	0.24		$	0.16		$	0.35		$	0.26
Anti-dilutive securities not considered in diluted EPS calculation			138,117			545,881			65,798			565,118

Below is a reconciliation of basic and diluted share counts:



	Thirteen Weeks Ended		Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021	June 24, 2020	June 30, 2021	June 24, 2020
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic	35,927,781	34,836,410	35,861,493	34,747,785
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted shares	488,905	573,788	561,901	634,822
Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted	36,416,686	35,410,198	36,423,394	35,382,607

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Trimaran Pollo Partners, L.L.C. (“LLC”) owns approximately 45.7% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. This large position means that LLC and its majority owners—predecessors and affiliates of, and certain funds managed by, Trimaran Capital Partners and Freeman Spogli & Co. (collectively, “Trimaran” and “Freeman Spogli,” respectively)—possess significant influence when stockholders vote on matters such as election of directors, mergers, consolidations and acquisitions, the sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, decisions affecting the Company’s capital structure, amendments to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated by-laws, and the Company’s winding up and dissolution. The Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that (i) so long as LLC beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, more than 40% of the Company’s common stock, any member of the Board of Directors or the entire Board of Directors may be removed from office at any time with or without cause by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Company’s common stock, and (ii) prior to the date the LLC ceases to beneficially own, directly or indirectly, 40% or more of the Company’s common stock, stockholders representing at least 40% of the Company’s common stock may call a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders.

10. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

Revenue Recognition

Nature of products and services

The Company has two revenue streams, company-operated restaurant revenue and franchise related revenue.

Company-operated restaurant revenue

Revenues from the operation of company-operated restaurants are recognized as food and beverage products are delivered to customers and payment is tendered at the time of sale. The Company presents sales, net of sales-related taxes and promotional allowances.

The Company offers a loyalty rewards program, which awards a customer points for dollars spent. Customers earn points for each dollar spent and as of August 4, 2020, 50 points can be redeemed for a $5 reward to be used for a future purchase. Prior to August 4, 2020, 100 points could be redeemed for a $10 reward. If a customer does not earn or use points within a one-year period, their account is deactivated and all points expire. Additionally, if a reward is not used within six months, it expires. When a customer is part of the rewards program, the obligation to provide future discounts related to points earned is considered a separate performance obligation, to which a portion of the transaction price is allocated. The performance obligation related to loyalty points is deemed to have been satisfied, and the amount deferred in the balance sheet is recognized as revenue, when the points are transferred to a reward and redeemed, the reward or points have expired, or the likelihood of redemption is remote. A portion of the transaction price is allocated to loyalty points, if necessary, on a pro-rata basis, based on stand-alone selling price, as determined by menu pricing and loyalty points terms. As of June 30, 2021 and December 30, 2020, the revenue allocated to loyalty points that have not been redeemed was $0.6 million and $0.9 million, respectively, which is reflected in the Company’s accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets within other accrued expenses and current liabilities. The Company expects the loyalty points to be redeemed and recognized over a one-year period.

Table of Contents

The Company sells gift cards to its customers in the restaurants and through selected third parties. The gift cards sold to customers have no stated expiration dates and are subject to actual and/or potential escheatment rights in several of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Furthermore, due to these escheatment rights, the Company does not recognize breakage related to the sale of gift cards due to the immateriality of the amount remaining after escheatment. The Company recognizes income from gift cards when redeemed by the customer. Unredeemed gift card balances are deferred and recorded as other accrued expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Franchise and franchise advertising revenue

Franchise revenue consists of franchise royalties, initial franchise fees, license fees due from franchisees, IT support services, and rental income for subleases to franchisees. Franchise advertising revenue consists of advertising contributions received from franchisees. These revenue streams are made up of the following performance obligations:

●

Franchise license - inclusive of advertising services, development agreements, training, access to plans and help desk services.

●

Discounted renewal option.

●

Hardware services.

The Company satisfies the performance obligation related to the franchise license over the term of the franchise agreement, which is typically 20 years. Payment for the franchise license consists of three components, a fixed-fee related to the franchise/development agreement, a sales-based royalty fee and a sales-based advertising fee. The fixed fee, as determined by the signed development and/or franchise agreement, is due at the time the development agreement is entered into, and/or when the franchise agreement is signed, and does not include a finance component.

The sales-based royalty fee and sales-based advertising fee are considered variable consideration and will continue to be recognized as revenue as such sales are earned by the franchisees. Both sales-based fees qualify under the royalty constraint exception, and do not require an estimate of future transaction price. Additionally, the Company is utilizing the practical expedient available under ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“Topic 606”) regarding disclosure of the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations that are unsatisfied for sales-based royalties.

In certain franchise agreements, the Company offers a discounted renewal to incentivize future renewals after the end of the initial franchise term. As this is considered a separate performance obligation, the Company allocates a portion of the initial franchise fee to this discounted renewal, on a pro-rata basis, assuming a 20-year renewal. This performance obligation is satisfied over the renewal term, typically 10 or 20 years, while payment is fixed and due at the time the renewal is signed.

The Company purchases hardware, such as scanners, printers, cash registers and tablets, from third party vendors, which it then sells to franchisees. As the Company is considered the principal in this relationship, payment for the hardware is considered revenue, and is received upon transfer of the goods from the Company to the franchisee. As of June 30, 2021, there were no performance obligations related to hardware services that were unsatisfied or partially satisfied.

Table of Contents

Disaggregated revenue

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by revenue source and market (in thousands):


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30,		June 24,			June 30,		June 24,
	2021		2020			2021		2020
Core Market⁽¹⁾:
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	99,429	$	81,370	$	186,652	$	167,285
Franchise revenue		4,086		3,208		7,773		6,716
Franchise advertising fee revenue		3,084		2,384		5,861		5,025
Total core market	$	106,599	$	86,962	$	200,286	$	179,026
Non-Core Market⁽²⁾:
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	7,541	$	6,337	$	14,478	$	13,056
Franchise revenue		4,304		3,511		8,229		7,065
Franchise advertising fee revenue		3,541		2,794		6,713		5,620
Total non-core market	$	15,386	$	12,642	$	29,420	$	25,741
Total revenue	$	121,985	$	99,604	$	229,706	$	204,767

(1)	Core Market includes markets with existing company-operated restaurants at the time of the Company’s IPO on July 28, 2014.

(2)	Non-Core Market includes markets entered into by the Company subsequent to the IPO date.

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by geographic market:


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020		June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Greater Los Angeles area market	70.6	%	71.1	%	70.4	%	71.7	%
Other markets	29.4	%	28.9	%	29.6	%	28.3	%
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%

Contract balances

The following table provides information about the change in the franchise contract liability balances during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 and June 24, 2020 (in thousands):


December 30, 2020	$	5,628
Revenue recognized - beginning balance		(349)
Additional contract liability		384
June 30, 2021	$	5,663

December 25, 2019	$	6,317
Revenue recognized - beginning balance		(544)
June 24, 2020	$	5,773

The Company’s franchise contract liability includes development fees, initial franchise and license fees, franchise renewal fees, lease subsidies and royalty discounts and is included within other accrued expenses and current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company receives area development fees from franchisees when they execute multi-unit area development agreements. Initial franchise and license fees, or franchise renewal fees, are received from franchisees upon the execution of, or renewal of, a franchise agreement. Revenue is recognized from these agreements as the underlying performance obligation is satisfied, which is over the term of the agreement.

Table of Contents

The following table illustrates the estimated revenue to be recognized in future periods related to performance obligations under the applicable contracts that are unsatisfied as of June 30, 2021 (in thousands):


Franchise revenues:
2021	$	242
2022		455
2023		423
2024		411
2025		406
Thereafter		3,726
Total	$	5,663

Changes in the loyalty rewards program liability included in deferred revenue within other accrued expenses and current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows (in thousands):


	June 30,		December 30,
	2021		2020
Loyalty rewards liability, beginning balance	$	900	$	1,084
Revenue deferred		1,336		2,463
Revenue recognized		(1,591)		(2,647)
Loyalty rewards liability, ending balance	$	645	$	900

The Company expects all loyalty points revenue related to performance obligations unsatisfied as of June 30, 2021 to be recognized within one year.

Gift Cards

The gift card liability included in other accrued expenses and current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets was as follows (in thousands):


	June 30,		December 30,
	2021		2020
Gift card liability	$	3,667	$	4,008

Revenue recognized from the redemption of gift cards that was included in other accrued expenses and current liabilities at the beginning of the year was as follows (in thousands):


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020		June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Revenue recognized from gift card liability balance at the beginning of the year	$	318	$	77	$	1,420	$	753

Contract Costs

The Company does not currently incur costs to obtain or fulfill a contract that would be considered contract assets under Topic 606.

Table of Contents

11. LEASES

Nature of leases

The Company’s operations utilize property, facilities, equipment and vehicles leased from others. Additionally, the Company has various contracts with vendors that have been determined to contain an embedded lease in accordance with Topic 842.

As of June 30, 2021, the Company had one lease that it had entered into, but had not yet commenced. The Company does not have control of the property until lease commencement.

Building and facility leases

The majority of the Company’s building and facilities leases are classified as operating leases; however, the Company currently has two facility and nine equipment leases that are classified as finance leases.

Restaurants are operated under lease arrangements that generally provide for a fixed base rent and, in some instances, contingent rent based on a percentage of gross operating profit or net revenues in excess of a defined amount. Additionally, a number of the Company’s leases have payments, which increase at pre-determined dates based on the change in the consumer price index. For all leases, the Company also reimburses the landlord for non-lease components, or items that are not considered components of a contract, such as CAM, property tax and insurance costs. While the Company determined not to separate lease and non-lease components, these payments are based on actual costs, making them variable consideration and excluding them from the calculations of the ROU asset and lease liability.

The initial terms of land and restaurant building leases are generally 20 years, exclusive of options to renew. These leases typically have four 5-year renewal options, which have generally been excluded in the calculation of the ROU asset and lease liability, as they are not considered reasonably certain to be exercised, unless (1) the renewal had already occurred as of the time of adoption of Topic 842, or (2) there have been significant leasehold improvements that have a useful life that extend past the original lease term. Furthermore, there are no residual value guarantees and no restrictions imposed by the lease.

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, the Company reassessed the lease terms on five and twelve restaurants, respectively, due to certain triggering events, such as the addition of significant leasehold improvements, the decision to terminate a lease, or the decision to renew. As a result of the reassessment, an additional $6.5 million and $11.2 million of ROU asset and lease liabilities for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, respectively, were recognized and will be amortized over the new lease term. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company reassessed the lease terms on four and seven restaurants, respectively, due to the addition of significant leasehold improvements with useful lives that extend past the current lease expiration, the decision to terminate a lease or the decision to renew leases. This reassessment resulted in an additional $1.4 million and $1.7 million of ROU asset and lease liability for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively, which will be recognized over the new lease term. The reassessments did not have any impact on the original lease classification. Additionally, as the Company adopted all practical expedients available under Topic 842, no reallocation between lease and non-lease components was necessary.

The Company also subleases facilities to certain franchisees and other non-related parties which are also considered operating leases. Sublease income also includes contingent rental income based on net revenues. The vast majority of these leases have rights to extend terms via fixed rental increases. However, none of these leases have early termination rights, the right to purchase the premises or any residual value guarantees. The Company does not have any related party leases.

During the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, the Company determined that the carrying value of ROU assets at two restaurants was not recoverable. As a result, the Company recorded a $0.4 million non-cash impairment charge for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, related to one restaurant closed in Texas in 2019 and one restaurant in California. The Company recorded a $0.5 million non-cash impairment charge for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 related to one restaurant in Texas sold to franchisees in the prior year. See Note 1, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and ROU Assets” for additional information.

Table of Contents

Equipment

Leases of equipment primarily consist of restaurant equipment, copiers and vehicles. These leases are fixed payments with no variable component. Additionally, no optional renewal periods have been included in the calculation of the ROU asset, there are no residual value guarantees and no restrictions imposed.

Significant Assumptions and Judgments

In applying the requirements of Topic 842 the Company made significant assumptions and judgments related to determination of whether a contract contains a lease and the discount rate used for the lease.

In determining if any of the Company’s contracts contain a lease the Company made assumptions and judgments related to its ability to direct the use of any assets stated in the contract and the likelihood of renewing any short-term contracts for a period extending past twelve months.

The Company also made significant assumptions and judgments in determining an appropriate discount rate for property leases. These included using a consistent discount rate for a portfolio of leases entered into at varying dates, using the full 20-year term of the lease, excluding any options, and using the total minimum lease payments. The Company utilizes a third-party valuation firm in determining the discount rate, based on the above assumptions. For all other leases, the Company uses the discount rate implicit in the lease, or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate.

As the Company has adopted the practical expedient not to separate lease and non-lease components, no significant assumptions or judgments were necessary in allocating consideration between these components, for all classes of underlying assets.

The following table presents the Company’s total lease cost, disaggregated by underlying asset (in thousands):


	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021						June 24, 2020
	Property		Equipment				Property		Equipment
	Leases		Leases		Total		Leases		Leases		Total
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets	$	22	$	1	$	23	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest on lease liabilities		15		1		16		5		—		5
Operating lease cost		6,626		293		6,919		6,545		307		6,852
Short-term lease cost		—		5		5		—		5		5
Variable lease cost		153		83		236		105		45		150
Sublease income		(798)		—		(798)		(763)		—		(763)
Total lease cost	$	6,018	$	383	$	6,401	$	5,892	$	357	$	6,249


	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021						June 24, 2020
	Property		Equipment				Property		Equipment
	Leases		Leases		Total		Leases		Leases		Total
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets	$	42	$	1	$	43	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest on lease liabilities		30		1		31		11		—		11
Operating lease cost		13,383		594		13,977		13,075		614		13,689
Short-term lease cost		—		10		10		—		12		12
Variable lease cost		275		190		465		209		70		279
Sublease income		(1,594)		—		(1,594)		(1,541)		—		(1,541)
Total lease cost	$	12,136	$	796	$	12,932	$	11,754	$	696	$	12,450

Table of Contents

The following table presents the Company’s total lease cost on the condensed consolidated statements of income (in thousands):


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020		June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Lease cost – Occupancy and other operating expenses	$	6,149	$	5,917	$	12,380	$	11,796
Lease cost – General & administrative		103		119		219		230
Lease cost – Depreciation and amortization		22		6		42		11
Lease cost – Interest expense		15		—		30		—
Lease cost - Closed-store reserve		112		207		261		413
Total lease cost	$	6,401	$	6,249	$	12,932	$	12,450

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 and June 24, 2020, the Company had the following cash and non-cash activities associated with its leases (dollars in thousands):



	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 30, 2021								Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 24, 2020
	Property			Equipment					Property			Equipment
	Leases			Leases			Total		Leases			Leases			Total
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities
Operating cash flows used for operating leases	$	12,357		$	575		$	12,932	$	9,269		$	619		$	9,888
Financing cash flows used for finance leases	$	33		$	20		$	53	$	16		$	—		$	16

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Operating lease ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating lease ROU assets	$	11,260		$	—		$	11,260	$	1,650		$	12		$	1,662
Finance lease ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Finance lease ROU assets	$	—		$	196		$	196	$	—		$	—		$	—
Derecognition of ROU assets due to terminations, impairment or modifications	$	(4,513)		$	(39)		$	(4,552)	$	(543)		$	(15)		$	(558)

Other Information
Weighted-average remaining lease term—finance leases		17.61			4.44					2.33			—
Weighted-average remaining lease term—operating leases		11.51			1.87					11.73			2.74
Weighted-average discount rate—finance leases		2.75	%		1.57	%				11.10	%		—
Weighted-average discount rate—operating leases		4.42	%		3.92	%				4.34	%		3.93	%

Information regarding the Company’s minimum future lease obligations as of June 30, 2021 is as follows (in thousands):


	Finance		Operating Leases
	Minimum		Minimum		Minimum
	Lease		Lease		Sublease
For the Years Ending	Payments		Payments		Income
December 29, 2021	$	100	$	14,563	$	1,587
December 28, 2022		190		27,511		3,368
December 27, 2023		145		25,381		3,451
December 25, 2024		145		23,146		3,336
December 31, 2025		141		20,821		2,986
Thereafter		1,690		140,805		25,814

Table of Contents

Total	$	2,411	$	252,227	$	40,542
Less: imputed interest (1.57% - 4.42%)		(484)		(57,463)
Present value of lease obligations		1,927		194,764
Less: current maturities		(147)		(19,572)
Noncurrent portion	$	1,780	$	175,192

Short-Term Leases

The Company has multiple short-term leases, which have terms of less than 12 months, and thus were excluded from the recognition requirements of Topic 842. The Company has recognized these lease payments in its consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term and variable lease payments in the period in which the obligation for those payments was incurred.

In April 2020, the FASB issued guidance allowing entities to make a policy election whether to account for lease concessions related to the COVID-19 pandemic as lease modifications. The election applies to any lessor-provided lease concession related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, provided the concession does not result in a substantial increase in the rights of the lessor or in the obligations of the lessee. During fiscal 2020, the Company received non-substantial concessions from certain landlords in the form of rent deferrals and abatements. The Company elected to not account for these rent concessions as lease modifications. The rent concessions are recorded as part of other accrued expenses. The recognition of rent concessions did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2021.

Lessor

The Company is a lessor for certain property, facilities and equipment owned by the Company and leased to others, principally franchisees, under non-cancelable leases with initial terms ranging from three to 20 years. These lease agreements generally provide for a fixed base rent and, in some instances, contingent rent based on a percentage of gross operating profit or net revenues. All leases are considered operating leases.

For the leases in which the Company is the lessor, there are options to extend the lease. However, there are no terms and conditions to terminate the lease, no right to purchase premises and no residual value guarantees. Additionally, there are no related party leases.

The Company received $0.1 million of lease income from company-owned locations for each of the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2021 and June 24, 2020. The Company received $0.2 million and $0.3 million of lease income from company-owned locations for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 and June 24, 2020, respectively.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this report are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements discuss our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. You can identify forward-looking statements because they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “outlook,” “potential,” “project,” “projection,” “plan,” “intend,” “seek,” “may,” “could,” “would,” “will,” “should,” “can,” “can have,” “likely,” the negatives thereof and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. They appear in a number of places throughout this report and include statements regarding our intentions, beliefs or current expectations concerning, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, strategies and the industry in which we operate. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those that we expected.

While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. You should evaluate all forward-

Table of Contents

looking statements made in this report in the context of the factors that could cause outcomes to differ materially from our expectations. These factors include, but are not limited to:

●

the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our company, our employees, our customers, our partners, our industry and the economy as a whole, as well as our franchisees’ ability to maintain operations in their individual restaurants;

●

our ability to open new restaurants in new and existing markets, including difficulty in finding sites and in negotiating acceptable leases;

●

our ability to compete successfully with other quick-service and fast casual restaurants;

●

vulnerability to changes in consumer preferences and economic conditions;

●

vulnerability to political and social factors, including regarding trade, immigration or customer preferences;

●

vulnerability to conditions in the greater Los Angeles area;

●

vulnerability to natural disasters given the geographic concentration and real estate intensive nature of our business;

●

the possibility that we may continue to incur significant impairment of certain of our assets, in particular in our new markets;

●

changes to food and supply costs, especially for chicken;

●

social media and negative publicity, whether or not valid, and our ability to respond to and effectively manage the accelerated impact of social media;

●

our ability to continue to expand our digital business, delivery orders and catering;

●

concerns about food safety and quality and about food-borne illness, particularly avian flu;

●

dependence on frequent and timely deliveries of food and supplies and our dependence on a single supplier to distribute substantially all of our products to our restaurants;

●

our ability to service our level of indebtedness;

●

uncertainty related to the success of our marketing programs, new menu items, advertising campaigns and restaurant designs and remodels;

●

our reliance on our franchisees, who may incur financial hardships, lose access to credit, close restaurants, or declare bankruptcy, and our limited control over our franchisees and potential liability for their acts;

●

potential exposure to unexpected costs and losses from our self-insurance programs;

●

potential obligations under long-term and non-cancelable leases, and our ability to renew leases at the end of their terms;

●

the impact of any failure of our information technology system or any breach of our network security;

●

the impact of any security breaches of confidential customer data or personal information in connection with our electronic process of credit and debit card transactions;

●

our ability to enforce and maintain our trademarks and protect our other proprietary intellectual property;

●

risks related to government regulation and litigation, including employment and labor laws; and

●

other risks set forth in our filings with the SEC from time to time, including under Item 1A, Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2020, which filings are available online at www.sec.gov.

We caution you that the important factors referenced above may not contain all of the factors that are important to you. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will realize the results or developments we expect or anticipate or, even if substantially realized, that they will result in the consequences we anticipate or affect us or our operations in the ways that we expect. The forward-looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be made that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

Overview

El Pollo Loco is a differentiated and growing restaurant concept that specializes in fire-grilling citrus-marinated chicken and operates in the LSR segment. We strive to offer food that integrates the culinary traditions of Mexico with the healthier lifestyle of Los Angeles, a combination that we call “LA-Mex.” Our distinctive menu features our signature product--citrus-marinated fire-grilled chicken--and a variety of Mexican and LA-inspired entrees that we create from our chicken. We serve individual and family-sized chicken meals, a variety of Mexican and LA-inspired entrees, and sides,

Table of Contents

and, throughout the year, on a limited-time basis, additional proteins like shrimp. Our entrees include favorites such as our Chicken Avocado Burrito, Pollo Fit entrees, chicken tostada salads, and Pollo Bowls. Our famous Creamy Cilantro dressings and salsas are prepared fresh daily, allowing our customers to create their favorite flavor profiles to enhance their culinary experience. Our distinctive menu with better for you and more affordable alternatives appeals to consumers across a wide variety of socio-economic backgrounds and drives our balanced composition of sales throughout the day (our “day-part mix”), including at lunch and dinner.

COVID-19 Impact

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted our restaurant operations. Following the pandemic declaration in March 2020, federal, state and local governments began to respond to the public health crisis by requiring social distancing, “stay at home” directives, and restaurant restrictions - including government-mandated dining room closures - that limited business to off-premise services only (take-out, drive-thru and delivery). Historically, approximately 20% of our sales are associated with dine-in service. Many state and local governments continue to periodically implement certain restrictions to try and contain the spread of the virus. As of June 30, 2021, the nearly all of our restaurants have dining rooms open at full capacity and continue to maintain take-away, mobile pick-up, delivery, and drive-thru operations where available. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, we temporarily closed 5 and 50 restaurants, respectively, of which all have reopened as of June 30, 2021. Similarly, during both thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, our franchisees temporarily closed 27 restaurants, of which all have reopened as of June 30, 2021. For both franchise-operated and company-operated restaurants, this represents total temporary closures and may include more than one closure for the same restaurant. These closures typically lasted from one to three days. As of June 30, 2021, we had not permanently closed any restaurants due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequent to June 30, 2021, the Company has not temporarily closed any restaurants, and franchisees have not temporarily closed any restaurants.

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, we incurred $0.2 million and $3.0 million, respectively, in COVID-19 related expenses, primarily due to leaves of absence and overtime pay. During both thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company incurred $1.1 million in COVID-19 related expenses, primarily due to leaves of absence and overtime pay.

Growth Strategies and Outlook

As of June 30, 2021, we had 480 locations in six states. In fiscal 2020, we opened one new company-operated restaurant in Nevada, which was in process prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and our franchisees opened three new restaurants, two in California and one in Arizona. For the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, two new company-operated restaurants were opened, one in Nevada and one in California, and no new franchised restaurants were opened.

We plan to continue to expand our business, drive restaurant sales growth, and enhance our competitive positioning, by executing the following strategies:

●

expand our restaurant base;

●

increase our comparable restaurant sales; and

●

enhance operations and leverage our infrastructure.

To increase comparable restaurant sales, we plan to increase customer frequency, attract new customers, and improve per-person spend. Success of these growth plans is not guaranteed.

Highlights and Trends

Comparable Restaurant Sales

For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, system-wide comparable restaurant sales increased by 21.0% and 14.2%, respectively, from the comparable period in the prior year. For company-operated restaurants, comparable restaurant sales for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 increased by 16.4% and 9.8%, respectively. For company-operated restaurants, the quarter’s change in comparable restaurant sales consisted of an approximately

Table of Contents

0.4% increase in average check size and an increase in transactions of 15.9%, and the year-to-date change in comparable restaurant sales consisted of a 1.5% increase in transactions and a 8.2% increase in average check size. For franchised restaurants, comparable restaurant sales increased 24.5% and 17.5% for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, respectively. Refer to Comparable Restaurant Sales definition in “Key Performance Indicators” section below.

Restaurant Development

Our restaurant counts at the beginning and end of each of the last three fiscal years and the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, were as follows:


	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended	Fiscal Year Ended
	June 30, 2021	2020	2019	2018
Company-operated restaurant activity:
Beginning of period	196	195	213	212
Openings	2	1	2	8
Restaurant sale to franchisee	—	—	(16)	—
Closures	—	—	(4)	(7)
Restaurants at end of period	198	196	195	213
Franchised restaurant activity:
Beginning of period	283	287	271	265
Openings	—	3	2	9
Restaurant sale to franchisee	—	—	16	—
Closures	(1)	(7)	(2)	(3)
Restaurants at end of period	282	283	287	271
System-wide restaurant activity:
Beginning of period	479	482	484	477
Openings	2	4	4	17
Closures	(1)	(7)	(6)	(10)
Restaurants at end of period	480	479	482	484

Restaurant Remodeling

In 2020, we finalized a new restaurant design that we believe will clearly differentiate and communicate our brand, both on the exterior and interior. We believe that our remodels using this new design will result in higher restaurant revenue and a strengthened brand. As of June 30, 2021, we have completed seven remodels using the new asset design. In fiscal 2021, we plan to complete a total of 15 company and 40 franchise remodels using the new design.

Loco Rewards

During the second quarter of 2017, we introduced a new loyalty rewards points program in an effort to increase sales and loyalty among our customers, by offering rewards that incentivize customers to visit our restaurants more often each month. Customers earn points for each dollar spent and as of August 4, 2020, 50 points can be redeemed for a $5 reward to be used for a future purchase. Prior to August 4, 2020, 100 points could be redeemed for a $10 reward. If a customer does not earn or use points within a one-year period, their account is deactivated and all points expire. Additionally, if a reward is not used within six months, it expires. When a customer is part of the rewards program, the obligation to provide future discounts related to points earned is considered a separate performance obligation, to which a portion of the transaction price is allocated. The performance obligation related to loyalty points is deemed to have been satisfied, and the amount deferred in the balance sheet is recognized as revenue, when the points are transferred to a reward and redeemed, the reward or points have expired, or the likelihood of redemption is remote. A portion of the transaction price is allocated to loyalty points on a pro-rata basis, based on stand-alone selling price, as determined by menu pricing and loyalty point’s terms.

In addition, customers can earn additional points and free entrées for a variety of engagement activities. As points are available for redemption past the quarter earned, a portion of the revenue associated with the earned points will be deferred until redemption or expiration. As of June 30, 2021 and December 30, 2020, the revenue allocated to loyalty points that had not been redeemed was $0.6 million and $0.9 million, respectively, which is reflected in the Company’s

Table of Contents

accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets within other accrued expenses and current liabilities. The Company had over 2.4 million loyalty program members as of June 30, 2021.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under current circumstances in making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily available from other sources. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Accounting policies are an integral part of our condensed consolidated financial statements. A thorough understanding of these accounting policies is essential when reviewing our reported results of operations and our financial position. Management believes that the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed below involve the most difficult management judgments, due to the sensitivity of the methods and assumptions used. For a summary of our critical accounting policies and a discussion of our use of estimates, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates” in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2020.

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies or uses of estimates since our annual report on Form 10-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements are described in Note 1, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements above.

Key Financial Definitions

Revenue

Our revenue is derived from three primary sources: company-operated restaurant revenue, franchise revenue, which is comprised primarily of franchise royalties and, to a lesser extent, franchise fees and sublease rental income, and franchise advertising fee revenue. See Note 10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements above for further details regarding our revenue recognition policy.

Food and Paper Costs

Food and paper costs include the direct costs associated with food, beverage and packaging of our menu items. The components of food and paper costs are variable in nature, change with sales volume, are impacted by menu mix, and are subject to increases or decreases in commodity costs.

Labor and Related Expenses

Labor and related expenses include wages, payroll taxes, workers’ compensation expense, benefits, and bonuses paid to our restaurant management teams. Like other expense items, we expect labor costs to grow proportionately as our restaurant revenue grows. Factors that influence labor costs include minimum wage and payroll tax legislation, overtime, the frequency and severity of workers’ compensation claims, health care costs, and the performance of our restaurants.

Occupancy Costs and Other Operating Expenses

Occupancy costs include rent, CAM, and real estate taxes. Other restaurant operating expenses include the costs of utilities, advertising, credit card processing fees, restaurant supplies, repairs and maintenance, and other restaurant operating costs.

Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses are comprised of expenses associated with corporate and administrative functions that support the development and operations of our restaurants, including compensation and benefits, travel expenses, stock compensation costs, legal and professional fees, and other related corporate costs. Also included are pre-opening costs, and expenses above the restaurant level, including salaries for field management, such as area and regional managers, and franchise field operational support.

Legal Settlements

Legal settlements include expenses such as judgments or settlements related to legal matters, legal claims and class action lawsuits.

Franchise Expenses

Franchise expenses are primarily comprised of rent expenses incurred on properties leased by us and then sublet to franchisees, expenses incurred in support of franchisee information technology systems, and the franchisee’s portion of advertising expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization primarily consists of the depreciation of property and equipment, including leasehold improvements and equipment.

Loss on Disposal of Assets

Loss on disposal of assets includes the loss on disposal of assets related to retirements and replacement or write-off of leasehold improvements or equipment.

Impairment and Closed-Store Reserves

We review long-lived assets such as property, equipment, and intangibles on a unit-by-unit basis for impairment when events or circumstances indicate a carrying value of the assets that may not be recoverable. We determine if there is impairment at the restaurant level by comparing undiscounted future cash flows from the related long-lived assets to their respective carrying values and record an impairment charge when appropriate. In determining future cash flows, significant estimates are made by us with respect to future operating results of each restaurant over its remaining lease term, including sales trends, labor rates, commodity costs and other operating cost assumptions. If assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment charge is measured by calculating the amount by which the asset carrying amount exceeds its fair value. This process of assessing fair values requires the use of estimates and assumptions, including our ability to sell or reuse the related assets and market conditions, which are subject to a high degree of judgment. If these assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets and these charges could be material.

When the Company closes a restaurant, it will evaluate the ROU asset for impairment, based on anticipated sublease recoveries. The remaining value of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis, with the expense recognized in closed-store reserve expense, in addition to property tax and CAM charges for closed restaurants.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net, consists primarily of interest on our outstanding debt. Debt issuance costs are amortized at cost over the life of the related debt.

Provision for Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes consists of federal and state taxes on our income.

Table of Contents

Comparison of Results of Operations

Our operating results for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2021 and June 24, 2020 and expressed as percentages of total revenue, with the exception of cost of operations and company restaurant expenses, which are expressed as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue, are compared below.


	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021			June 24, 2020			Increase / (Decrease)
	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)
Statements of Income Data
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	106,970	87.7	$	87,707	88.1	$	19,263	22.0
Franchise revenue		8,389	6.9		6,719	6.7		1,670	24.9
Franchise advertising fee revenue		6,626	5.4		5,178	5.2		1,448	28.0
Total revenue		121,985	100.0		99,604	100.0		22,381	22.5
Cost of operations
Food and paper costs (1)		27,882	26.1		22,873	26.1		5,009	21.9
Labor and related expenses (1)		31,526	29.5		25,759	29.4		5,767	22.4
Occupancy and other operating expenses (1)		25,336	23.7		21,922	25.0		3,414	15.6
Company restaurant expenses (1)		84,744	79.3		70,554	80.5		14,190	20.1
General and administrative expenses		10,523	8.6		10,465	10.5		58	0.6
Franchise expenses		8,161	6.7		6,627	6.7		1,534	23.1
Depreciation and amortization		3,917	3.2		4,168	4.2		(251)	(6.0)
Loss on disposal of assets		85	0.1		27	0.0		58	214.8
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expenses and other insurance claims		—	—		(123)	(0.1)		123	(100.0)
Loss on assets held for sale		1,524	1.2		—	—		1,524	N/A
Impairment and closed-store reserves		360	0.3		437	0.4		(77)	(17.6)
Total expenses		109,314	89.6		92,155	92.5		17,159	18.6
Income from operations		12,671	10.4		7,449	7.5		5,222	70.1
Interest expense, net of interest income		433	0.4		908	0.9		(475)	(52.3)
Income tax receivable agreement expense		27	0.0		290	0.3		(263)	(90.7)
Income before provision for income taxes		12,211	10.0		6,251	6.3		5,960	95.3
Provision for income taxes		3,393	2.8		752	0.8		2,641	351.2
Net income	$	8,818	7.2	$	5,499	5.5	$	3,319	60.4

(1)	Percentages for line items relating to cost of operations and company restaurant expenses are calculated with company-operated restaurant revenue as the denominator. All other percentages use total revenue.

Our operating results for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 and June 24, 2020 and expressed as percentages of total revenue, with the exception of cost of operations and company restaurant expenses, which are expressed as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue, are compared below.


	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021			June 24, 2020			Increase / (Decrease)
	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)
Statements of Income Data
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	201,131	87.6	$	180,341	88.1	$	20,790	11.5
Franchise revenue		16,001	7.0		13,781	6.7		2,220	16.1
Franchise advertising fee revenue		12,574	5.4		10,645	5.2		1,929	18.1
Total revenue		229,706	100.0		204,767	100.0		24,939	12.2
Cost of operations
Food and paper costs (1)		52,273	26.0		48,435	26.9		3,838	7.9
Labor and related expenses (1)		62,258	31.0		54,452	30.2		7,806	14.3
Occupancy and other operating expenses (1)		49,180	24.5		44,031	24.4		5,149	11.7
Company restaurant expenses (1)		163,711	81.5		146,918	81.5		16,793	11.4
General and administrative expenses		20,997	9.1		19,796	9.7		1,201	6.1
Franchise expenses		15,912	6.9		13,538	6.6		2,374	17.5
Depreciation and amortization		7,855	3.4		8,537	4.2		(682)	(8.0)

Table of Contents

Loss on disposal of assets		111	0.0		127	0.1		(16)	(12.6)
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expenses and other insurance claims		—	—		(123)	(0.1)		123	(100.0)
Loss on assets held for sale		1,524	0.7		—	—		1,524	N/A
Impairment and closed-store reserves		924	0.4		2,839	1.4		(1,915)	(67.5)
Total expenses		211,034	91.9		191,632	93.6		19,402	10.1
Income from operations		18,672	8.1		13,135	6.4		5,537	42.2
Interest expense, net of interest income		950	0.4		1,813	0.9		(863)	(47.6)
Income tax receivable agreement (income) expense		(50)	(0.0)		170	0.1		(220)	(129.4)
Income before provision for income taxes		17,772	7.7		11,152	5.4		6,620	59.4
Provision for income taxes		4,990	2.2		2,053	1.0		2,937	143.1
Net income	$	12,782	5.5	$	9,099	4.4	$	3,683	40.5

(1)	Percentages for line items relating to cost of operations and company restaurant expenses are calculated with company-operated restaurant revenue as the denominator. All other percentages use total revenue.

Company-Operated Restaurant Revenue

For the quarter, company-operated restaurant revenue increased $19.3 million, or 22.0%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The increase in company-operated restaurant sales was primarily due to an increase in company-operated comparable restaurant revenue of $17.0 million, or 16.4%. The company-operated comparable restaurant sales increase consisted of an approximately 0.4% increase in average check size and a 15.9% increase in transactions. In addition, company-operated revenue was favorably impacted by $1.3 million of additional sales from restaurants opened during or after the second quarter of the prior year and a $1.1 million increase in revenue from restaurants that were temporarily closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic during the second quarter of the prior year.

Year-to-date, company-operated restaurant revenue increased $20.8 million, or 11.5%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The increase in company-operated restaurant sales was primarily due to a $19.2 million, or 9.8% increase in company-operated comparable restaurant revenue. In addition, company-operated revenue was favorably impacted by $1.7 million of additional sales from restaurants opened during or after the first quarter of the prior year and a $0.2 million increase in revenue from restaurants that were temporarily closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic during the year-to-date period of the prior year. The company-operated comparable restaurant sales increase consisted of an approximately 8.2% increase in average check size and a 1.5% increase in transactions. See above under “COVID-19 Impact” for additional information related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.

Franchise Revenue

For the quarter, franchise revenue increased $1.7 million, or 24.9%, from the comparable period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to a franchise comparable restaurant sales increase of 24.5% and the opening of two restaurants during or subsequent to the second quarter of 2020. This franchise revenue increase was partially offset by the closure of three franchise locations during or subsequent to the second quarter of 2020.

Year-to-date, franchise revenue increased $2.2 million, or 16.1%, from the comparable period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to a franchise comparable restaurant sales increase of 17.5% and the opening of three restaurants during or subsequent to the first quarter of 2020. This franchise revenue increase was partially offset by the closure of seven franchise locations during or subsequent to the first quarter of 2020.

Franchise Advertising Fee Revenue

For the quarter, franchise advertising fee revenue increased $1.4 million, or 28.0%, from the comparable period in the prior year. Year-to-date, franchise advertising fee revenue increased $1.9 million, or 18.1%, from the comparable period in the prior year. As advertising fee revenue is a percentage of franchisees’ revenue, the quarter-to-date fluctuations were due to the increases and decreases noted in franchise revenue above.

Table of Contents

Food and Paper Costs

For the quarter, food and paper costs increased $5.0 million, or 21.9%, from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to a $3.6 million increase in food costs and a $1.4 million increase in paper costs. Year-to-date, food and paper costs increased $3.8 million, or 7.9%, from the comparable period in the prior year, due to a $2.4 million increase in food costs and a $1.4 million increase in paper costs. The increase in food and paper costs for the quarter and year-to-date periods resulted primarily from higher company transactions, sales mix and commodity inflation. For the quarter, food and paper costs as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 26.1%, consistent with the comparable period of the prior year as higher prices offset the cost increases above. Year-to-date, food and paper costs as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 26.0%, down from 26.9% in the comparable period of the prior year. The percentage decrease for the year-to-date period was due primarily to an increase in pricing and effective waste management, partially offset by sales mix and commodity inflation.

Labor and Related Expenses

For the quarter, labor and related expenses increased $5.8 million, or 22.4%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The increase for the quarter was primarily due to $2.6 million related to the 15.9% increase in year-over-year sales transactions, a $1.3 million increase in overtime, a $0.6 million increase related to higher minimum wage increases in California during fiscal 2020 and 2021, a $0.5 million increase in medical and workers compensation expense, due to higher claims activity, $0.4 million higher in payroll taxes and $0.4 million related to employee training and other labor related expenses.

Year-to-date, labor and related expenses increased $7.8 million, or 14.3%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The increase for the year-to-date period was due to a $2.2 million increase in overtime, $1.4 million related to the 1.5% increase in year-over-year sales transactions, a $1.2 million increase related to higher minimum wage increases in California during fiscal 2020 and 2021, $1.2 million in labor costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, a $0.4 million increase in medical and workers compensation expense due to higher claims activity, $0.5 million in higher payroll taxes and $0.9 million related to employee training and other labor related expenses.

For the quarter, labor and related expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 29.5%, consistent with the comparable period in the prior year as higher prices and efficiencies offset the cost increases highlighted above. Year-to-date labor and related expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 31.0%, up from 30.2% in the comparable period in the prior year. The year-to-date percentage was impacted by the cost increases highlighted above, partially offset by an increase in pricing and labor efficiencies.

Occupancy and Other Operating Expenses

For the quarter, occupancy and other operating expenses increased $3.4 million, or 15.6%, from the comparable period of the prior year. Fluctuations in occupancy and other expenses consisted primarily of a $0.8 million increase in advertising fees, a $0.6 million increase in utilities, a $0.4 million increase in repairs and maintenance costs, a $0.4 million increase in other operating expenses, a $0.4 million increase in market place delivery fees, a $0.3 million increase in operating supplies, a $0.2 million increase in occupancy costs, primarily related to rent expense and higher general liability claims and a $0.3 million increase in credit card charges.

Year-to-date, occupancy and other operating expenses increased $5.1 million, or 11.7%, from the comparable period of the prior year. The increase was primarily due to a $0.9 million increase in advertising fees, $0.9 million increase in market place delivery fees, a $0.7 million increase in utilities, a $0.7 million increase in operating supplies, a $0.7 million increase in repairs and maintenance costs, a $0.5 million increase in occupancy costs, primarily related to rent expense and higher general liability claims, a $0.4 million increase in credit card charges and a $0.4 million increase in other operating expenses.

For the quarter, occupancy and other operating expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 23.7% down from 25.0% in the comparable period in the prior year. Year-to-date, occupancy and other operating expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 24.5%, up from 24.4% in the comparable period of the prior year. The decrease for the quarter resulted primarily from higher revenue, partially offset by the increase in costs noted above. The slightly higher percentage on a year-to-date basis reflects the cost increases noted above partially offset by higher year-to-date revenue.

Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expenses

For the quarter, general and administrative expenses increased $0.1 million, or 0.6%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The increase for the quarter was due primarily to a $1.3 million increase in labor related costs, primarily related to an increase in management bonus expense, a $0.3 million increase in stock compensation expenses, and a $0.4 million increase in temporary office staff and recruiting fees, partially offset by a $2.1 million decrease in legal and professional expenses.

Year-to-date, general and administrative expenses increased $1.2 million, or 6.1%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The increase for the year-to-date period was due primarily to a $1.6 million increase in labor related costs, primarily related to an increase in management bonus expense, a $0.7 million increase in stock compensation expenses and a $0.7 million increase in temporary office staff and recruiting fees. This increase was partially offset by a $1.8 million decrease in legal and professional expenses, related primarily to a $2.5 million legal settlement in the prior year period discussed in Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies, Legal Matters” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements above.

For the quarter, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue were 8.6%, down from 10.5% in the comparable period of the prior year. The percentage decrease for the quarterly period resulted primarily from higher revenue. Year-to-date, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue were 9.1%, down from 9.7% in the comparable period of the prior year. The year-to-date percentage decrease is primarily due to the higher revenue, partially offset by the cost increases discussed above.

Loss on held for sale assets

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, we agreed in principle to sell eight restaurants within the Sacramento area to an existing franchisee. The net assets were recorded to assets held for sale at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell, which resulted in a loss on held for sale assets of $1.5 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021. Prior to June 30, 2021, we received $4.6 million of cash primarily representing the purchase price of the transaction. The funds were recorded within our cash and cash equivalents and other accrued expenses and current liabilities within our condensed consolidated balance sheet. The eight restaurants were sold subsequent to June 30, 2021.

Impairment and Closed-Store Reserves

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of one restaurant in Texas closed in 2019, the ROU assets of one restaurant in California, and the long-lived assets of three restaurants in California. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.1 million and $2.0 million, respectively, primarily related to the carrying value of the assets of one restaurant in Texas and the long-lived assets of three restaurants in California. Given the inherent uncertainty in projecting results for newer restaurants in newer markets, as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company is monitoring the recoverability of the carrying value of the assets of several restaurants on an ongoing basis. For these restaurants, if expected performance is not realized, an impairment charge may be recognized in future periods, and such charge could be material.

When a restaurant is closed, we will evaluate the ROU asset for impairment, based on anticipated sublease recoveries. The remaining value of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis, with the expense recognized in closed-store reserve expense. Additionally, any property tax and CAM payments relating to closed restaurants are included within closed-store expense. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, we recognized less than $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of closed-store reserve expense related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for our closed locations. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we recognized $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of closed-store reserve expense, primarily related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for our closed locations.

Table of Contents

Interest Expense, Net

For the quarter and year-to-date, interest expense, net, decreased $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, from the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease is primarily related to lower interest rates and lower outstanding balances on our 2018 Revolver.

Income Tax Receivable Agreement

On July 30, 2014, we entered into the TRA. The TRA calls for us to pay to our pre-IPO stockholders 85% of the savings in cash that we realize in our taxes as a result of utilizing our NOLs and other tax attributes attributable to preceding periods. For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, we recorded income tax receivable agreement expense of less than $0.1 million and income tax receivable agreement income of less than $0.1 million, respectively, and for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 we recorded income tax receivable agreement expense of $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

Provision for Income Taxes

For the quarter ended June 30, 2021, we recorded an income tax provision of $3.4 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of 27.8%. For the quarter ended June 24, 2020, we recorded an income tax provision of $0.8 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of approximately 12.0%. For the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2021, we recorded an income tax provision of $5.0 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of approximately 28.1%. For the year-to-date ended June 24, 2020, we recorded an income tax provision of $2.1 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of approximately 18.4%.

The difference between the 21.0% statutory rate and the Company’s effective tax rate of 28.1% for the year-to-date ended June 30, 2021 is primarily a result of a windfall tax benefit related to stock options exercised, non-deductible executive compensation, state taxes, a Work Opportunity Tax Credit benefit, the change in valuation allowance against certain state credits and prior year true up related to stock based compensation.

Key Performance Indicators

To evaluate the performance of our business, we utilize a variety of financial and performance measures. These key measures include company-operated restaurant revenue, system-wide sales, comparable restaurant sales, restaurant contribution, restaurant contribution margin, new restaurant openings, EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA.

System-Wide Sales

System-wide sales are neither required by, nor presented in accordance with GAAP. System-wide sales are the sum of company-operated restaurant revenue and sales from franchised restaurants. Our total revenue in our consolidated statements of operations is limited to company-operated restaurant revenue and franchise revenue from our franchisees. Accordingly, system-wide sales should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for our results as reported under GAAP. Management believes that system-wide sales are an important figure for investors, because they are widely used in the restaurant industry, including by our management, to evaluate brand scale and market penetration.

The following table reconciles system-wide sales to company-operated restaurant revenue and total revenue:


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020		June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	106,970	$	87,707	$	201,131	$	180,341
Franchise revenue		8,389		6,719		16,001		13,781
Franchise advertising fee revenue		6,626		5,178		12,574		10,645
Total Revenue		121,985		99,604		229,706		204,767
Franchise revenue		(8,389)		(6,719)		(16,001)		(13,781)
Franchise advertising fee revenue		(6,626)		(5,178)		(12,574)		(10,645)
Sales from franchised restaurants		148,130		115,593		281,095		238,120
System-wide sales	$	255,100	$	203,300	$	482,226	$	418,461

Table of Contents

Company-Operated Restaurant Revenue

Company-operated restaurant revenue consists of sales of food and beverages in company-operated restaurants net of promotional allowances, employee meals, and other discounts. Company-operated restaurant revenue in any period is directly influenced by the number of operating weeks in such period, the number of open restaurants, and comparable restaurant sales.

Seasonal factors and the timing of holidays cause our revenue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. Our revenue per restaurant is typically lower in the first and fourth quarters due to reduced January and December traffic and higher in the second and third quarters. As a result of seasonality, our quarterly and annual results of operations and key performance indicators such as company-operated restaurant revenue and comparable restaurant sales may fluctuate. In addition, we expect our quarterly company-operated restaurant revenue and comparable restaurant sales to continue to fluctuate significantly due to the current COVID-19 pandemic. See above under “COVID-19 Impact” for additional information related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.

Comparable Restaurant Sales

Comparable restaurant sales reflect year-over-year sales changes for comparable company-operated, franchised, and system-wide restaurants. A restaurant enters our comparable restaurant base the first full week after it has operated for fifteen months. Comparable restaurant sales exclude restaurants closed during the applicable period. At June 30, 2021 and June 24, 2020, there were 465 and 469 comparable restaurants, 191 and 191 company-operated restaurants and 274 and 278 franchised restaurants, respectively. Comparable restaurant sales indicate the performance of existing restaurants, since new restaurants are excluded.

Comparable restaurant sales growth can be generated by an increase in the number of meals sold and/or by increases in the average check amount, resulting from a shift in menu mix and/or higher prices resulting from new products or price increases.

Restaurant Contribution and Restaurant Contribution Margin

Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin are neither required by, nor presented in accordance with, GAAP. Restaurant contribution is defined as company-operated restaurant revenue less company restaurant expenses which includes food and paper cost, labor and related expenses and occupancy and other operating expenses, where applicable. Restaurant contribution excludes certain costs, such as general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, impairment and closed-store reserve and other costs that are considered normal operating costs and accordingly, restaurant contribution is not indicative of overall Company results and does not accrue directly to the benefit of stockholders because of the exclusion of certain corporate-level expenses. Restaurant contribution margin is defined as restaurant contribution as a percentage of net company-operated restaurant revenue.

Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin are supplemental measures of operating performance of our restaurants, and our calculations thereof may not be comparable to those reported by other companies. Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation, or superior to, or as substitutes for the analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Management uses restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin as key metrics to evaluate the profitability of incremental sales at our restaurants, to evaluate our restaurant performance across periods, and to evaluate our restaurant financial performance compared with our competitors. Management believes that restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin are important tools for investors, because they are widely-used metrics within the restaurant industry to evaluate restaurant-level productivity, efficiency, and performance. Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin may also assist investors in evaluating our business and performance relative to industry peers and provide greater transparency with respect to the Company’s financial condition and results of operation.

Table of Contents

A reconciliation of restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin to company-operated restaurant revenue is provided below:


	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	June 30, 2021			June 24, 2020			June 30, 2021			June 24, 2020
Restaurant contribution:
Income from operations	$	12,671		$	7,449		$	18,672		$	13,135
Add (less):
General and administrative expenses		10,523			10,465			20,997			19,796
Franchise expenses		8,161			6,627			15,912			13,538
Depreciation and amortization		3,917			4,168			7,855			8,537
Loss on disposal of assets		85			27			111			127
Loss on assets held for sale		1,524			—			1,524			—
Franchise revenue		(8,389)			(6,719)			(16,001)			(13,781)
Franchise advertising fee revenue		(6,626)			(5,178)			(12,574)			(10,645)
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expenses and other insurance claims		—			(123)			—			(123)
Impairment and closed-store reserves		360			437			924			2,839
Restaurant contribution	$	22,226		$	17,153		$	37,420		$	33,423

Company-operated restaurant revenue:
Total revenue	$	121,985		$	99,604		$	229,706		$	204,767
Less:
Franchise revenue		(8,389)			(6,719)			(16,001)			(13,781)
Franchise advertising fee revenue		(6,626)			(5,178)			(12,574)			(10,645)
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	106,970		$	87,707		$	201,131		$	180,341

Restaurant contribution margin (%)		20.8	%		19.6	%		18.6	%		18.5	%

New Restaurant Openings

The number of restaurant openings reflects the number of new restaurants opened by us and our franchisees during a particular reporting period. Before a new restaurant opens, we and our franchisees incur pre-opening costs, as described below. New restaurants often open with an initial start-up period of higher than normal sales volumes, which subsequently decrease to stabilized levels. New restaurants typically experience normal inefficiencies in the form of higher food and paper, labor, and other direct operating expenses and, as a result, restaurant contribution margins are generally lower during the start-up period of operation. The average start-up period after which our new restaurants’ revenue and expenses normalize is approximately fourteen weeks. When we enter new markets, we may be exposed to start-up times and restaurant contribution margins that are longer and lower than reflected in our average historical experience.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA represents net income before interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation, amortization, and items that we do not consider representative of our on-going operating performance, as identified in the reconciliation table below.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as presented in this report are supplemental measures of our performance that are neither required by, nor presented in accordance with, GAAP. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measurements of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income, operating income, or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP, or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity. In addition, in evaluating EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future we will incur expenses or charges such as those added back to calculate EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. Our presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or nonrecurring items.

Table of Contents

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation, or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are (i) they do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments, (ii) they do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs, (iii) they do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt, (iv) although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements, (v) they do not adjust for all non-cash income or expense items that are reflected in our statements of cash flows, (vi) they do not reflect the impact of earnings or charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our on-going operations, and (vii) other companies in our industry may calculate these measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures.

We compensate for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from such non-GAAP financial measures. We further compensate for the limitations in our use of non-GAAP financial measures by presenting comparable GAAP measures more prominently.

We believe that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA facilitate operating performance comparisons from period to period by isolating the effects of some items that vary from period to period without any correlation to core operating performance or that vary widely among similar companies. These potential differences may be caused by variations in capital structures (affecting interest expense), tax positions (such as the impact on periods or companies of changes in effective tax rates or NOL) and the age and book depreciation of facilities and equipment (affecting relative depreciation expense). We also present EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because (i) we believe that these measures are frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate companies in our industry, (ii) we believe that investors will find these measures useful in assessing our ability to service or incur indebtedness, and (iii) we use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA internally for a number of benchmarks including to compare our performance to that of our competitors.

The following table sets forth reconciliations of our net income to our EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:


	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(Amounts in thousands)	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020		June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Net income	$	8,818	$	5,499	$	12,782	$	9,099
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		3,393		752		4,990		2,053
Interest expense, net of interest income		433		908		950		1,813
Depreciation and amortization		3,917		4,168		7,855		8,537
EBITDA	$	16,561	$	11,327	$	26,577	$	21,502
Stock-based compensation expense (a)		1,041		727		1,894		1,261
Loss on disposal of assets (b)		85		27		111		127
Loss on assets held for sale (c)		1,524		—		1,524		—
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expense and other insurance claims (d)		—		(123)		—		(123)
Impairment and closed-store reserves (e)		360		437		924		2,839
Income tax receivable agreement expense (income) (f)		27		290		(50)		170
Securities class action legal expense (g)		307		37		671		238
Legal settlements (h)		—		2,499		—		2,566
Pre-opening costs (i)		21		59		184		110
Adjusted EBITDA	$	19,926	$	15,280	$	31,835	$	28,690

(a)	Includes non-cash, stock-based compensation.

(b)	Loss on disposal of assets includes the loss on disposal of assets related to retirements and replacement or write-off of leasehold improvements or equipment.

(c)

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, we agreed in principle to sell eight restaurants within Sacramento area to an existing franchisee. The related net assets were reclassified to assets held for sale and remeasured at their fair value less costs to sell, which resulted in a loss on held for sale assets of $1.5 million for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021.

Table of Contents

(d)	During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we received insurance proceeds of $0.1 million related to a property claim.

(e)

Includes costs related to impairment of long-lived and ROU assets and closing restaurants. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of one restaurant in Texas closed in 2019, the ROU assets of one restaurant in California, and the long-lived assets of three restaurants in California. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.1 million and $2.0 million, respectively, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of one restaurant in Texas and the long-lived assets of three restaurants in California.

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, we recognized less than $0.1 million and $0.2 million of closed-store reserve expense related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for our closed locations. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we recognized $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of closed-store reserve expense, primarily related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for our closed locations.

(f)

On July 30, 2014, we entered into the TRA. This agreement calls for us to pay to our pre-IPO stockholders 85% of the savings in cash that we realize in our taxes as a result of utilizing our NOL and other tax attributes attributable to preceding periods. For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 and June 24, 2020, income tax receivable agreement (income) expense consisted of the amortization of interest expense and changes in estimates for actual tax returns filed, related to our total expected TRA payments.

(g)	Consists of costs related to the defense of securities lawsuits. See Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies, Legal Matters” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements above.

(h)	Includes amounts incurred related to the payment of the final settlement amounts for multiple wage and hour class action suits.

(i)

Pre-opening costs are a component of general and administrative expenses, and consist of costs directly associated with the opening of new restaurants and incurred prior to opening, including management labor costs, staff labor costs during training, food and supplies used during training, marketing costs, and other related pre-opening costs. These are generally incurred over the three to five months prior to opening. Pre-opening costs also include occupancy costs incurred between the date of possession and the opening date for a restaurant.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources have been cash provided from operations, cash and cash equivalents, and the 2018 Revolver. Our primary requirements for liquidity and capital are new restaurants, existing restaurant capital investments (remodels and maintenance), legal defense costs, lease obligations, interest payments on our debt, working capital and general corporate needs. Our working capital requirements are not significant, since our customers pay for their purchases in cash or by payment card (credit or debit) at the time of sale. Thus, we are able to sell many of our inventory items before we have to pay our suppliers. Our restaurants do not require significant inventories or receivables. We believe that these sources of liquidity and capital are sufficient to finance our continued operations for at least the next 12 months from the issuance of the consolidated financial statements. However, depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the efforts taken to reduce its spread and the possibility of a subsequent resurgence of the COVID-19 outbreak after the current outbreak subsides, our financial performance and liquidity could be further impacted and could impact our ability to meet certain financial covenants required in our 2018 Credit Agreement, specifically the lease-adjusted coverage ratio and fixed-charge coverage ratio.

The following table presents summary cash flow information for the periods indicated.


	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(Amounts in thousands)	June 30, 2021		June 24, 2020
Net cash provided by (used in)
Operating activities	$	26,624	$	11,082
Investing activities		(4,272)		(2,479)
Financing activities		(22,947)		43,669
Net increase (decrease) in cash	$	(595)	$	52,272

Table of Contents

Operating Activities

For the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, net cash from operating activities changed by approximately $15.5 million from the comparable period of the prior year. This change was due primarily to an increase in profitability after non-cash items and favorable working capital fluctuations.

Investing Activities

For the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, net cash used in investing activities increased by $1.8 million from the comparable period of the prior year. This increase was due primarily to opening two new company-operated restaurants and remodeling five restaurants in the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 compared to opening no new company-operated restaurants and completing no new remodels in the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2020. In addition, during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, the Company received a deposit of $4.6 million on sale of eight restaurants within the Sacramento area.

Financing Activities

For the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, net cash from financing activities changed by $66.6 million from the comparable period of the prior year. This change was due primarily to an increase in net borrowings of $44.5 million on the 2018 Revolver during the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, primarily as a precautionary measure to bolster our existing cash position in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to provide for the $16.3 million litigation settlement payment. In addition, during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021, the Company paid down $22.8 million on the 2018 Revolver.

Debt and Other Obligations

The 2018 Revolver, which is available pursuant to the 2018 Credit Agreement, includes a sub limit of $15.0 million for letters of credit and a sub limit of $15.0 million for swingline loans. The 2018 Revolver and 2018 Credit Agreement will mature on July 13, 2023. The obligations under the 2018 Credit Agreement and related loan documents are guaranteed by the Company and Intermediate. The obligations of the Company, EPL and Intermediate under the 2018 Credit Agreement and related loan documents are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of their respective assets.

The 2018 Credit Agreement contains certain financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants as of June 30, 2021.

Table of Contents

At June 30, 2021, $8.4 million of letters of credit and $40.0 million of borrowings were outstanding under the 2018 Revolver. There were $101.6 million remaining borrowings available under the 2018 Revolver at June 30, 2021.

During the year ended December 25, 2019, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $40.0 million, related to the outstanding borrowings under our 2018 Revolver. The interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge and effectively converted a portion of our outstanding borrowings to a fixed rate of 1.31%, plus the applicable margin spread, which was 1.5% for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2021. The interest rate swap matures in June 2023.

Contractual Obligations

Other than our paydown of $22.8 million on the 2018 Revolver during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2021 described above, our contractual obligations outstanding on June 30, 2021 have not changed materially since those disclosed under “Debt and Other Obligations – Contractual Obligations” in Part II, Item 7 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2020. Our contractual commitments relate to future (i) debt payments, including expected interest expense, calculated based on current interest rates, (ii) restaurant operating lease payments, (iii) income tax receivable agreement payments, and (iv) purchasing commitments for chicken.

Off-Balance Sheet and Other Arrangements

As of June 30, 2021 and December 25, 2020, we were using $8.4 million of borrowing capacity on the 2018 Revolver for letters of credit in support of our insurance programs.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on our debt, which bears interest, at USD LIBOR plus a margin between 1.25% and 2.25%. As of June 30, 2021, we had outstanding borrowings of $40.0 million under our 2018 Revolver, $8.4 million of letters of credit in support of our insurance programs, and the applicable margin on outstanding borrowings under 2018 Revolver was 1.5%. In addition, certain tenors of LIBOR are expected to be phased out beginning after 2021. Organizations are currently working on industry wide and company specific transition plans as it relates to financial and other derivative contracts exposed to LIBOR. When LIBOR ceases to exist, we may need to enter into an amendment to the 2018 Credit Agreement and we cannot predict what alternative index would be negotiated with our lenders. If future rates based upon a successor rate are higher than LIBOR rates as currently determined or if our lenders have increased costs due to changes in LIBOR, we may experience potential increases in interest rates on our variable rate debt, which could adversely impact our interest expense, results of operations and cash flows. After giving effect to the $40.0 million of interest rate swaps described below, we effectively did not have any long-term debt subject to variations in interest rates as of June 30, 2021 and as such, a one percent increase in the variable rate of interest would not result in any increase in annual interest expense.

We manage our interest rate risk through normal operating and financing activities and, when determined appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. To balance our portfolio, we entered into an interest rate swap during the year ended December 25, 2019 with a notional amount of $40.0 million, related to the outstanding borrowings under our 2018 Revolver. The interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge and effectively converted a portion of our outstanding borrowings to a fixed rate of 1.31%, plus applicable margin, which was 1.5% for the twenty-six weeks ended June30, 2021. The interest rate swap matures in June 2023.

Inflation

Inflation has an impact on food, paper, construction, utility, labor and benefits, general and administrative, and other costs, all of which can materially impact our operations. We have a substantial number of hourly employees who are paid wage rates at or based on the applicable federal, state, or local minimum wage, and increases in the minimum wage will increase our labor costs. In general, we have been able to substantially offset cost increases resulting from inflation by increasing menu prices, managing menu mix, improving productivity, or making other adjustments. We may not be able to offset cost increases in the future.

Table of Contents

Commodity Price Risk

We are exposed to market price fluctuation in food product prices. Given the historical volatility of certain of our food product prices, including chicken, other proteins, grains, produce, dairy products, and cooking oil, these fluctuations can materially impact our food and beverage costs. While our purchasing commitments partially mitigate the risk of such fluctuations, there is no assurance that supply and demand factors such as disease or inclement weather will not cause the prices of the commodities used in our restaurant operations to fluctuate. In periods when the prices of commodities drop, we may pay higher prices under our purchasing commitments. In rapidly fluctuating commodities markets, it may prove difficult for us to adjust our menu prices in accordance with input price fluctuations. Therefore, to the extent that we do not pass along cost increases to our customers, our results of operations may be adversely affected. At this time, we do not use financial instruments to hedge our commodity risk.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our disclosure controls and procedures are based on assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Because of their inherent limitations, we cannot guarantee that our disclosure controls and procedures will succeed in achieving their stated objectives in all cases, that they will be complied with in all cases, or that they will prevent or detect all misstatements.

Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, at the reasonable assurance level, as of June 30, 2021.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

For information regarding legal proceedings, see Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies—Legal Matters” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” above, which information is incorporated by reference into this Item 1.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2020 filed with the SEC on March 15, 2021.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Index

Number	Description	Filed Herewith	Form	Period Ended	Exhibit	Filing Date	SEC File Number

3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.		10-Q	6/25/2014	3.1	9/5/2014	001-36556

3.2	Amended and Restated By-Laws of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.		10-Q	6/25/2014	3.2	9/5/2014	001-36556
10.1	El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. Equity Incentive		8-K		10.1	6/14/2021	001-36556

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer under section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002	X

31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer under section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002	X

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. section 1350, adopted by section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002	*

101.INS	Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document	X

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	X

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	X

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	X

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document	X

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	X

104	Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page interactive data file does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL Document	X

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K (17 C.F.R. § 229.601(b)(32)(ii)), this certification is deemed furnished, not filed, for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, nor is it otherwise subject to liability under that section. It will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except if the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.
		(Registrant)

Date: August 6, 2021		/s/ Bernard Acoca
		Bernard Acoca
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(duly authorized officer)
Date: August 6, 2021		/s/ Laurance Roberts
		Laurance Roberts
		Chief Financial Officer
		(principal financial officer)