EMCLAIRE FINANCIAL CORP - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended March 31,
2009
or
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from _____________ to _____________
Commission
File Number: 000-18464
EMCLAIRE
FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania
|
25-1606091
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
612
Main Street, Emlenton, Pennsylvania
|
16373
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(724)
867-2311
(Registrant’s
telephone number)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The
number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock was 1,431,404 at
May 14, 2009.
EMCLAIRE
FINANCIAL CORP.
INDEX
TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
PART I – FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1.
|
Interim
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of
|
||
March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
1
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the three
|
||
months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
2
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three
|
||
months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’
|
||
Equity
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
4
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
5
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
13
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
19
|
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
20
|
PART II – OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
20
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
20
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
21
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
21
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
21
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
21
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
21
|
Signatures
|
22
|
PART I - FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item 1. Interim
Financial Statements
Emclaire
Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
As of
March 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2008
(Dollar
amounts in thousands, except share data)
March 31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash and due from
banks
|
$ | 2,010 | $ | 4,292 | ||||
Interest earning deposits with
banks
|
30,082 | 12,279 | ||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
32,092 | 16,571 | ||||||
Securities available for sale, at
fair value
|
53,050 | 71,443 | ||||||
Loans receivable, net of allowance
for loan losses of $2,885 and $2,651
|
273,993 | 264,838 | ||||||
Federal bank stocks, at
cost
|
3,797 | 3,797 | ||||||
Bank-owned life
insurance
|
5,236 | 5,186 | ||||||
Accrued interest
receivable
|
1,355 | 1,519 | ||||||
Premises and equipment,
net
|
8,865 | 8,609 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
1,422 | 1,422 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other
assets
|
2,410 | 2,279 | ||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 382,220 | $ | 375,664 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders'
Equity
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Deposits:
|
||||||||
Non-interest
bearing
|
$ | 50,806 | $ | 56,351 | ||||
Interest
bearing
|
244,384 | 230,296 | ||||||
Total
deposits
|
295,190 | 286,647 | ||||||
Short-term borrowed
funds
|
12,000 | 13,188 | ||||||
Long-term borrowed
funds
|
35,000 | 35,000 | ||||||
Accrued interest
payable
|
767 | 761 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
3,090 | 3,945 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities
|
346,047 | 339,541 | ||||||
Commitments and
Contingencies
|
- | - | ||||||
Stockholders'
Equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred stock, $1.00
par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized;
|
||||||||
7,500 issued and
outstanding
|
7,417 | 7,412 | ||||||
Warrants
|
88 | 88 | ||||||
Common stock, $1.25 par
value, 12,000,000 shares authorized;
|
||||||||
1,559,421 shares issued; 1,431,404
shares outstanding
|
1,949 | 1,949 | ||||||
Additional paid-in
capital
|
14,588 | 14,564 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 128,017
shares
|
(2,653 | ) | (2,653 | ) | ||||
Retained
earnings
|
15,991 | 15,840 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
(1,207 | ) | (1,077 | ) | ||||
Total Stockholders'
Equity
|
36,173 | 36,123 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and
Stockholders' Equity
|
$ | 382,220 | $ | 375,664 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
Emclaire
Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Income
For the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)
(Dollar
amounts in thousands, except per share data)
For the three months
ended
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Interest and dividend
income:
|
||||||||
Loans receivable, including
fees
|
$ | 4,236 | $ | 3,928 | ||||
Securities:
|
||||||||
Taxable
|
529 | 378 | ||||||
Exempt from federal income
tax
|
152 | 161 | ||||||
Federal bank
stocks
|
5 | 30 | ||||||
Interest-earning deposits with
banks
|
89 | 23 | ||||||
Total interest and dividend
income
|
5,011 | 4,520 | ||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||
Deposits
|
1,540 | 1,572 | ||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
410 | 405 | ||||||
Total interest
expense
|
1,950 | 1,977 | ||||||
Net interest
income
|
3,061 | 2,543 | ||||||
Provision for loan
losses
|
297 | 60 | ||||||
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses
|
2,764 | 2,483 | ||||||
Noninterest
income:
|
||||||||
Fees and service
charges
|
340 | 358 | ||||||
Commissions on financial
services
|
85 | 118 | ||||||
Net gain on sale of available for
sale securities
|
56 | - | ||||||
Net gain on sales of
loans
|
4 | 14 | ||||||
Earnings on bank-owned life
insurance
|
56 | 56 | ||||||
Other
|
179 | 114 | ||||||
Total noninterest
income
|
720 | 660 | ||||||
Noninterest
expense:
|
||||||||
Compensation and employee
benefits
|
1,438 | 1,417 | ||||||
Premises and
equipment
|
481 | 420 | ||||||
Other
|
703 | 576 | ||||||
Total noninterest
expense
|
2,622 | 2,413 | ||||||
Income before provision for income
taxes
|
862 | 730 | ||||||
Provision for income
taxes
|
194 | 171 | ||||||
Net income
|
668 | 559 | ||||||
Accumulated preferred stock
dividends and discount accretion
|
98 | - | ||||||
Net income available to common
shareholders
|
$ | 570 | $ | 559 | ||||
Basic and diluted earnings per
common share
|
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.44 | ||||
Average common shares
outstanding
|
1,431,404 | 1,267,835 | ||||||
Dilutive
Shares
|
- | - |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Emclaire
Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
For the three months
ended
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities
|
||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 668 | $ | 559 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile
net income to net cash provided
|
||||||||
by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of
premises and equipment
|
196 | 165 | ||||||
Provision for loan
losses
|
297 | 60 | ||||||
Amortization of premiums and
(accretion of discounts), net
|
(53 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||
Amortization of intangible assets
and mortgage servicing rights
|
4 | 5 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred loan
costs
|
62 | 70 | ||||||
Realized (gain) loss on available
for sale securities, net
|
(56 | ) | - | |||||
Net gains on sales of
loans
|
(4 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||
Originations of loans
sold
|
(159 | ) | (355 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of
loans
|
163 | 357 | ||||||
Restricted stock and stock option
compensation
|
24 | 20 | ||||||
Earnings on bank-owned life
insurance, net
|
(50 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||
Decrease in accrued interest
receivable
|
164 | 5 | ||||||
Increase in prepaid expenses and
other assets
|
(4 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||
Increase in accrued interest
payable
|
6 | 9 | ||||||
Decrease in accrued expenses and
other liabilities
|
(855 | ) | (216 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
403 | 556 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing
activities
|
||||||||
Loan originations and principal
collections, net
|
(9,591 | ) | (3,164 | ) | ||||
Available for sale
securities:
|
||||||||
Sales
|
4,107 | - | ||||||
Maturities, repayments and
calls
|
18,193 | 24,486 | ||||||
Purchases
|
(3,998 | ) | (27,291 | ) | ||||
Redemption of federal bank
stocks
|
- | (35 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from the sale of
foreclosed real estate
|
16 | - | ||||||
Purchases of premises and
equipment
|
(452 | ) | (352 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
8,275 | (6,356 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing
activities
|
||||||||
Net increase in
deposits
|
8,543 | 7,269 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in
short-term borrowed funds
|
(1,188 | ) | 3,357 | |||||
Dividends
paid
|
(512 | ) | (405 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
6,843 | 10,221 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
15,521 | 4,421 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
16,571 | 10,483 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of period
|
$ | 32,092 | $ | 14,904 | ||||
Supplemental
information:
|
||||||||
Interest
paid
|
$ | 1,944 | $ | 1,968 | ||||
Supplemental noncash
disclosure:
|
||||||||
Transfers from loans to foreclosed
real estate
|
76 | - |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Emclaire
Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
For the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)
(Dollar
amounts in thousands, except per share data)
For the three months
ended
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Balance at beginning of
period
|
$ | 36,123 | $ | 24,703 | ||||
Net income
|
668 | 559 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income
(loss):
|
||||||||
Change in net unrealized gains
(losses) on available for sale
|
||||||||
securities, net of taxes of ($47)
in 2009 and $108 in 2008
|
(93 | ) | 209 | |||||
Less reclassification adjustment
for gains included
|
||||||||
in net income, net of taxes of
($19) in 2009 and $0 in 2008
|
(37 | ) | - | |||||
Other comprehensive income
(loss)
|
(130 | ) | 209 | |||||
Total comprehensive
income
|
538 | 768 | ||||||
Stock compensation
expense
|
24 | 20 | ||||||
Dividends declared on preferred
stock
|
(54 | ) | - | |||||
Dividends declared on common
stock
|
(458 | ) | (405 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of
period
|
$ | 36,173 | $ | 25,086 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Emclaire
Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1.
|
Nature
of Operations and Basis of
Presentation.
|
Emclaire
Financial Corp. (the “Corporation”) is a Pennsylvania company organized as the
holding company of Farmers National Bank of Emlenton (the “Bank”) and Emclaire
Settlement Services, LLC (the “Title Company”). The Corporation
provides a variety of financial services to individuals and businesses through
its offices in western Pennsylvania. Its primary deposit products are
checking, savings and certificate of deposit accounts and its primary lending
products are residential and commercial mortgages, commercial business and
consumer loans.
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and
its wholly owned subsidiaries, the Bank and the Title Company. All
significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
preparing the consolidated financial statements.
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for the interim periods
include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are
necessary, in the opinion of management, to fairly reflect the Corporation’s
consolidated financial position and results of
operations. Additionally, these consolidated financial statements for
the interim periods have been prepared in accordance with instructions for the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X and therefore do not include all information or footnotes
necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). For further
information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2008, as contained in the
Corporation’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
The
balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
The
preparation of financial statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in
the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that
are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to
the determination of the allowance for loan losses, fair value of financial
instruments, goodwill, the valuation of deferred tax assets and other than
temporary impairment charges. The results of operations for interim
quarterly or year to date periods are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the entire year or any other period. Certain
amounts previously reported may have been reclassified to conform to the current
year’s financial statement presentation.
2.
Earnings per Common Share.
Basic
earnings per common share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing
net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the
potential dilution that could occur if securities or contracts to issue common
stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance
of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the
Corporation. Options and restricted stock awards of 94,000 shares of
common stock and warrants to purchase 50,111 shares of common stock were not
included in computing diluted earnings per share because their cumulative
effects were not dilutive for the three months periods ended March 31, 2009 and
2008.
5
3.
Branch Purchase.
On April
6, 2009, the Corporation entered into a Purchase and Assumption Agreement with
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) and National City Bank (National City)
to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of National City’s
full-service branch office located in Titusville, Pennsylvania. As
part of the agreement, the Bank will assume approximately $90 million in
deposits in exchange for approximately $35 million in loans, cash, and certain
fixed assets of the branch office. The Bank has agreed to pay a
premium of 3.4% of deposits assumed based on the average balance of deposits
during a pre-determined period leading up to the transaction closing
date. The proposed branch office acquisition is subject to customary
closing conditions, including receipt of applicable regulatory
approvals. The Corporation intends to consummate the transaction
during the third quarter of 2009. The transaction is expected to be
accretive to the Corporation’s earnings in the fourth quarter of
2009.
4.
Securities.
The
Corporation’s securities as of the respective dates are summarized as
follows:
(Dollar amounts in
thousands)
|
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
||||||||||||
cost
|
gains
|
losses
|
value
|
|||||||||||||
Available for
sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
March 31,
2009:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies and
related entities
|
$ | 9,496 | $ | 38 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 9,524 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
26,932 | 729 | (65 | ) | 27,596 | |||||||||||
Municipal
securities
|
12,693 | 587 | - | 13,280 | ||||||||||||
Corporate
securities
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
3,893 | - | (1,243 | ) | 2,650 | |||||||||||
$ | 53,014 | $ | 1,354 | $ | (1,318 | ) | $ | 53,050 | ||||||||
December 31,
2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies and
related entities
|
$ | 19,985 | $ | 139 | $ | (47 | ) | $ | 20,077 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
29,806 | 586 | (12 | ) | 30,380 | |||||||||||
Municipal
securities
|
13,543 | 270 | (5 | ) | 13,808 | |||||||||||
Corporate
securities
|
3,984 | - | - | 3,984 | ||||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
3,893 | - | (699 | ) | 3,194 | |||||||||||
$ | 71,211 | $ | 995 | $ | (763 | ) | $ | 71,443 | ||||||||
Management
evaluates securities for other than temporary impairment at least on a quarterly
basis, and more frequently when economic, market or other concerns warrant such
evaluation. Consideration is given to: (1) the length of time and the
extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and (3) the intent and ability
of the Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
As of March 31, 2009, there were 13
securities in an unrealized loss position. These unrealized losses
are considered to be temporary impairments. A decline in the value of
the debt securities is due only to interest rate fluctuations, rather then
erosion of quality. As a result, the payment of contractual cash
flows, including principal repayment, is not at risk. As management
has the intent and ability to hold these investments until market recovery or
maturity, none of the unrealized losses on debt securities are deemed to be
other than temporary.
6
4. Securities
(continued).
Equity securities owned by the
Corporation consist of common stock of various financial service providers that
have traditionally been high-performing stocks. However, as a result
of recent market volatility in financial stocks, the fair value of most of the
stock held are “under water” as of March 31, 2009, and as such, could be
considered impaired. The Corporation does not invest in these
securities with the intent to sell them for a profit in the
near-term. Management believes these securities have potential to
appreciate in value over the long-term, while providing for a reasonable
dividend yield. In addition, stocks can by cyclical and will
experience some down periods. Historically, bank stocks have
sustained cyclical losses followed by periods of substantial
gains. Based on these circumstances and the ability and intent to
hold these securities for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a recovery
of fair value, the Corporation does not consider these investments to be other
than temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
5. Loans
Receivable.
The Corporation’s loans receivable as
of the respective dates are summarized as follows:
(Dollar amounts in
thousands)
|
March 31,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Mortgage loans on real
estate:
|
||||||||
Residential first
mortgages
|
$ | 72,844 | $ | 74,130 | ||||
Home equity loans and lines of
credit
|
55,723 | 57,454 | ||||||
Commercial real
estate
|
90,107 | 85,689 | ||||||
218,674 | 217,273 | |||||||
Other
loans:
|
||||||||
Commercial
business
|
49,499 | 40,787 | ||||||
Consumer
|
8,705 | 9,429 | ||||||
58,204 | 50,216 | |||||||
Total loans,
gross
|
276,878 | 267,489 | ||||||
Less allowance for loan
losses
|
2,885 | 2,651 | ||||||
Total loans,
net
|
$ | 273,993 | $ | 264,838 | ||||
6. Deposits.
The Corporation’s deposits as of the
respective dates are summarized as follows:
(Dollar amounts in
thousands)
|
March 31,
2009
|
March 31,
2008
|
||||||||||||||
Type of
accounts
|
Amount
|
%
|
Amount
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing
deposits
|
$ | 50,806 | 17.2 | % | $ | 56,351 | 19.7 | % | ||||||||
Interest bearing demand
deposits
|
113,431 | 38.4 | % | 106,042 | 37.0 | % | ||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
130,953 | 44.4 | % | 124,254 | 43.3 | % | ||||||||||
$ | 295,190 | 100.0 | % | $ | 286,647 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
7
7. Guarantees.
The
Corporation does not issue any guarantees that would require liability
recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of
credit. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued
by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third
party. Of these letters of credit at March 31, 2009, $81,000 will
expire within the next thirteen months, $663,000 will automatically renew within
the next twelve months and $307,000 will automatically renew within thirteen to
twenty-one months. The Corporation, generally, holds collateral
and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments. Management
believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the
enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient to cover the potential amount of
future payments required under the corresponding guarantees. The
credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as
those that are involved in extending loan facilities to
customers. The current amount of the liability as of March 31, 2009
for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued is not
material.
8.
|
Employee Benefit
Plans.
|
The
Corporation maintains a defined contribution 401(k) Plan. Eligible
employees participate by providing tax-deferred contributions up to 20% of
qualified compensation. Employee contributions are vested at all
times. The Corporation provides a matching contribution of up to 4%
of the participant’s salary. Matching contributions for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $37,000 and $37,000,
respectively.
The Corporation provides pension
benefits for eligible employees through a defined benefit pension
plan. Substantially all full-time employees participate in the
retirement plan on a non-contributing basis and are fully vested after five
years of service.
The
Corporation uses December 31 as the measurement date for its plans.
The
components of the periodic pension cost are as follows:
(Dollar amounts in
thousands)
|
For the three months
ended
|
Year ended
|
||||||||||
March 31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 62 | $ | 63 | $ | 233 | ||||||
Interest
cost
|
75 | 71 | 285 | |||||||||
Expected return on plan
assets
|
(66 | ) | (79 | ) | (305 | ) | ||||||
Prior service
costs
|
(8 | ) | (8 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||||
Recognized net actuarial
loss
|
27 | 4 | 19 | |||||||||
Net periodic pension
cost
|
$ | 90 | $ | 51 | $ | 201 | ||||||
The
expected rate of return on plan assets was 7.75% for the periods ended March 31,
2009 and 2008. The Corporation previously disclosed in its financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 that it expected to contribute
$350,000 to its pension plan in 2009. As of March 31, 2009, there
have been no contributions. The Corporation presently anticipates
contributing $350,000 to its pension plan in 2009.
8
9.
Stock Compensation Plans.
In May
2007, the Corporation adopted the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan and Trust. Under the
Plan, the Corporation may grant options to its directors, officers and employees
for up to 177,496 shares of common stock. Incentive stock options,
non-incentive or compensatory stock options and share awards may be granted
under the Plan. The exercise price of each option shall at least
equal the market price of a share of common stock on the date of grant and have
a contractual term of ten years. Options and restricted stock awards
shall vest and become exercisable at the rate, to the extent and subject to such
limitations as may be specified by the Corporation. The Corporation
accounts for its stock compensation plans in accordance with the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS
123(R)), which requires
that compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions be recognized
in the financial statements with measurement based upon the fair value of the
equity or liability instruments issued. For the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation recognized $24,000 and $20,000,
respectively, in stock compensation expense.
A summary
of option activity under the Plan as of March 31, 2009, and changes during the
period then ended is presented below:
Weighted-Average
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average
|
Aggregate
|
Remaining
Term
|
||||||||||||||
Options
|
Exercise
Price
|
Intrinsic
Value
|
(in years)
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding at the beginning of
the year
|
94,000 | $ | 25.66 | 8.7 | ||||||||||||
Granted
|
- | - | - | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | - | - | |||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
4,500 | 26.00 | - | |||||||||||||
Outstanding as of March 31,
2009
|
89,500 | $ | 25.64 | $ | - | 8.4 | ||||||||||
Exercisable as of March 31,
2009
|
- | $ | - | $ | - | - | ||||||||||
A summary
of the status of the Corporation’s nonvested shares as of March 31, 2009, and
changes during the period then ended is presented below:
Weighted-Average
|
||||||||
Options
|
Grant-date Fair
Value
|
|||||||
Nonvested at the beginning of the
year
|
94,000 | $ | 3.13 | |||||
Granted
|
- | - | ||||||
Vested
|
- | - | ||||||
Forfeited
|
4,500 | 3.39 | ||||||
Nonvested as of March 31,
2009
|
89,500 | $ | 3.12 | |||||
As of
March 31, 2009, there was $212,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the
Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over an average period
of 1.4 years.
9
10. Fair
Values of Financial Instruments.
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted FASB SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS
157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements
that require or permit fair value measurements.
SFAS 157
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation
methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest
priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable
inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value
hierarchy under SFAS 157 are as follows:
Level
1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are
accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or
liabilities.
Level 2: Quoted
prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability.
Level 3: Prices or
valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair
value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported with little or no market
activity).
An asset
or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
For
assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements
by level within the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
(Dollar amounts in
thousands)
|
(Level 1)
|
|
||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices
in
|
(Level
2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||||
Active
Markets
|
Significant Other |
Significant
|
||||||||||||||
for
Identical
|
Observable
|
Unobservable
|
||||||||||||||
Description
|
Total
|
Assets
|
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
||||||||||||
March 31,
2009:
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities available for
sale
|
$ | 53,050 | $ | 2,650 | $ | 50,400 | $ | - | ||||||||
$ | 53,050 | $ | 2,650 | $ | 50,400 | $ | - | |||||||||
Decmeber 31,
2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities available for
sale
|
$ | 71,443 | $ | 3,194 | $ | 68,249 | $ | - | ||||||||
$ | 71,443 | $ | 3,194 | $ | 68,249 | $ | - | |||||||||
For
assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, the fair value
measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy are as
follow:
(Dollar amounts in
thousands)
|
(Level 1)
|
|
||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices
in
|
(Level
2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||||
Active
Markets
|
Significant Other |
Significant
|
||||||||||||||
for
Identical
|
Observable
|
Unobservable
|
||||||||||||||
Description
|
Total
|
Assets
|
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
||||||||||||
March 31,
2009:
|
||||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | 580 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 580 | ||||||||
$ | 580 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 580 | |||||||||
Decmeber 31,
2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||
10
10. Fair
Values of Financial Instruments (continued).
The
following valuation techniques were used to measure fair value of assets in the
tables above:
Available for sale securities
– Fair value on available for sale securities were based upon a market
approach. Prices for securities that are fixed income instruments
that are not quoted on an exchange, but are traded in active markets, are
obtained through third party data service providers or dealer market
participants which the Corporation has historically transacted both purchases
and sales of investment securities. As of March 31, 2009, all fair
values on available for sale securities were based on prices obtained from these
sources and were based on actual market quotations for each specific
security.
Impaired loans – Fair value
on impaired loans is measured using the estimate fair market value of the
collateral less the estimate costs to sell. Fair value of the loan’s
collateral is typically determined by appraisals or independent
valuation. Management’s ongoing review of appraisal information may
result in additional discounts or adjustments to valuation based upon more
recent market sales activity or more current appraisal information derived from
properties of similar type and/or locale. As of March 31, 2009 the
fair value consists of the loan balance of $614,000, net of a valuation
allowance of $34,000. Additional provision for loan losses of $34,000
was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Effective
January 1, 2009, the Corporation adopted FSP 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
157 (FSP 157-2), which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all
non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. At March 31, 2009, the Corporation had no non-financial assets
or liabilities carried at fair value, measured on a recurring or non-recurring
basis.
11. Effect
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) SFAS No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3). This FSP amends
the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension
assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). The intent of this FSP
is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible
asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the
fair value of the asset under SFAS 141(R) and other GAAP. This FSP is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. This FSP did not effect the Corporation’s consolidated
financial statements.
In June
2008, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument
(or an Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock (EITF
07-5). EITF 07-5 provides that an entity should use a two step
approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded
feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s
contingent exercise and settlement provisions. It also clarifies the
impact of foreign currency denominated strike prices and market-based employee
stock option valuation instruments on the evaluation. EITF 07-5
became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. EITF 07-5 did not effect the Corporation’s consolidated
financial statements.
In
November 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 08-6, Equity Method Investment Accounting
Considerations (EITF 08-6). EITF 08-6 clarifies the accounting
for certain transactions and impairment considerations involving equity method
investments. EITF 08-6 became effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. EITF 08-6 did not effect the Corporation’s
consolidated financial statements.
11
11. Effect
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards (continued).
In April 2009, the FASB
issued FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP 107-1 and APB
28-1). FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1
amends FASB SFAS 107, Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting
periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements.
This FSP also amends
APB Opinion No. 28, Interim
Financial Reporting, to require those
disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting
periods. This FSP is effective
for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early
adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. An entity
early adopting FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 must also early adopt FSP FAS
157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not
Orderly and FSP FAS 115-2 and
FAS 124-2, Recognition
and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. The Corporation did not early adopt
this standard and is currently reviewing the effect this new pronouncement will
have on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and
Presentation of Other Than Temporary
Impairments (FSP 115-2 and
FAS 124-2). FSP 115-2 and FAS 124-2 clarifies the
interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining
whether a debt security is
other than temporarily
impaired. For debt securities, management must assess whether (a)
it has the intent to sell the security and (b)
it is more likely than not
that it will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery.
These steps are done before assessing
whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. Previously, this assessment required
management to assert it has both the intent and the ability to hold a security
for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair
value to avoid recognizing
an other than temporary
impairment. This change does not affect the need to
forecast recovery of the value of the security through either cash flows or
market price.
In instances when a determination is made that an other than
temporary impairment exists
but the investor does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more
likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security prior to its
anticipated recovery, FSP 115-2 and FAS 124-2 changes the presentation and
amount of the other than
temporary impairment
recognized in the income
statement. The other than temporary impairment is separated into (a)
the amount of the total
other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to
be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other than
temporary impairment
related to all other factors. The amount of the total other than
temporary impairment
related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total
other than temporary impairment related to all
other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.
This FSP is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009,
with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March
15, 2009. An
entity early adopting FSP 115-2 and FAS 124-2 must also early adopt FSP
157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not
Orderly. The Corporation did
not early adopt this standard and is currently reviewing the effect this new
pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No.FAS 157-4, Determining Fair
Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(FSP
157-4). FASB
SFAS 157, Fair Value
Measurements, defines fair
value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the
liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or
distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under
current market conditions. FSP 157-4 provides additional guidance
on determining when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability
has significantly decreased. The FSP also includes guidance on
identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered
orderly.
12
11. Effect
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards (continued).
FSP 157-4 provides a list of factors
that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a
significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability.
When the reporting entity concludes
there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for
the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is
needed and significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to
estimate fair value in accordance with SFAS 157.
This FSP clarifies that when there has
been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the entity
must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether the transaction is
orderly. The FSP provides a list of circumstances
that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not
associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when
estimating fair value.
This FSP is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009,
with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March
15, 2009. An
entity early adopting FSP 157-4 must also early adopt FSP 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and
Presentation of Other
Than Temporary
Impairments. The Corporation did
not early adopt this standard and is currently reviewing the effect this new
pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
This
section discusses the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
of Emclaire Financial Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, the Bank and the
Title Company, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same
period in 2008 and should be read in conjunction with the Corporation’s December
31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC and with the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and notes presented on pages 1 through 13 of
this Form 10-Q.
The
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 contains safe harbor provisions
regarding forward-looking statements. When used in this discussion,
the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “contemplates” and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are
subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those projected. Those risks and uncertainties
include changes in interest rates, the ability to control costs and expenses and
general economic conditions. The Corporation does not undertake, and
specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements
to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date
of such statements.
CHANGES
IN FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total
assets increased $6.6 million or 1.7% to $382.2 million at March 31, 2009 from
$375.7 million at December 31, 2008. This increase resulted from
increases in cash and cash equivalents and loans receivable, net of allowance
for loan losses, of $15.5 million and $9.2 million, respectively, partially
offset by a decrease in securities of $18.4 million. The net increase
in the Corporation’s assets was primarily funded by an increase in customer
deposits of $8.5 million.
Total
liabilities increased $6.5 million or 1.9% to $346.0 million at March 31, 2009
from $339.5 million at December 31, 2008, while total stockholders’ equity
increased to $36.2 million at March 31, 2009 from $36.1 million at December 31,
2008. The increase in total liabilities resulted primarily from
increases in customer deposits of $8.5 million, partially offset by a decrease
in borrowed funds of $1.2 million.
13
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Comparison
of Results for the Three Month Periods Ended March 31, 2009 and
2008
General. Net income
increased $109,000 or 19.5% to $668,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2009 from $559,000 for the same period in 2008. This increase was the
result of increases in net interest income and noninterest income of $518,000
and $60,000, respectively, partially offset by increases in the provision for
loan losses, noninterest expense and the provision for income taxes of $237,000,
$209,000 and $23,000, respectively.
Net interest
income. Net interest income on a tax equivalent basis
increased $531,000 or 20.1% to $3.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009 from $2.6 million for the same period in 2008. This net increase
can be attributed to an increase in tax equivalent interest income of $504,000
and a decrease in interest expense of $27,000.
Interest
income. Interest income on a tax equivalent basis increased
$504,000 or 10.9% to $5.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
compared to $4.6 million for the same period in the prior year. This
increase can be attributed to increases in interest on loans, securities and
interest-earning deposits with banks of $325,000, $138,000 and $66,000,
respectively, partially offset by a decrease in dividends on federal bank stocks
of $25,000.
Tax
equivalent interest earned on loans receivable increased $325,000 or 8.2% to
$4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $4.0 million
for the same period in 2008. This increase resulted primarily from
average loans increasing $45.8 million or 19.6%, accounting for $726,000 in
additional loan interest income. This increase can be primarily
attributed to growth in the Corporation’s commercial loan portfolios and loans
acquired through the merger of Elk County Savings and Loan Association (ECSLA)
in the fourth quarter of 2008. Offsetting this volume increase, the
yield on loans receivable decreased 59 basis points to 6.22% for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, versus 6.81% for the same period in 2008, due to a
decline in market interest rates, accounting for a $401,000 decrease in interest
income.
Tax
equivalent interest earned on securities increased $138,000 or 22.6% to $749,000
for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $611,000 for the same
period in 2008. The average volume of securities increased $13.8
million, primarily through U.S. Government agency and mortgage-backed security
purchases, accounting for a $171,000 increase in interest
income. Offsetting this volume increase, the average yield on
securities decreased 23 basis points to 5.00% for the three months ended March
31, 2009, versus 5.23% for the same period in 2008, due to declining market
interest rates. This unfavorable yield variance accounted for a
$33,000 decrease in interest income.
Interest
earned on interest-earning deposit accounts increased $66,000 to $89,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 from $23,000 for the same period in
2008. The average volume of these assets increased $18.8 million,
primarily due to investments made in certificates of deposit with other
financial institutions, increasing interest income by
$79,000. Offsetting this volume increase, the average yield on
interest-earning deposit accounts decreased 112 basis points to 1.63% for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to 2.75% for the same period in the
prior year, accounting for a $13,000 decrease in interest
income. This yield decrease was a result of the continued low
interest rate environment during 2008 and 2009.
Dividends
on federal bank stocks decreased $25,000 or 83.3% to $5,000 for the three month
period ended March 31, 2009 from $30,000 for the same period in
2008. The average yield on these assets decreased 426 basis points to
0.53% for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to 4.79% for the same
period the prior year, due to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh
suspending its dividend and repurchase of capital stock as announced in late
December 2008.
Interest
expense. Interest expense decreased $27,000 or 1.4% to $2.0
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same period in
2008. This decrease in interest expense can be attributed to a
decrease in interest incurred on deposits of $32,000, partially offset by an
increase in interest incurred on borrowings of $5,000.
14
Interest
expense incurred on deposits decreased $32,000 or 2.0% to $1.5 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 compared $1.6 million for the same period in
2008. The cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased 60 basis points
to 2.63% for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to 3.23% for the
same period in 2008 causing a $336,000 decrease in interest
expense. This occurred as management elected to lower deposit rates
during the three months ended March 31, 2009 as market rates continued to
decline. Partially offsetting this favorable rate variance, the
average volume of interest-bearing deposits increased $42.1 million or 21.5% to
$237.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $195.7
million for the same period in 2008 causing a $304,000 increase in interest
expense. The opening of the Grove City, PA office in 2008 and the
acquisition of ECSLA contributed to the increase in average
deposits.
Interest
expense incurred on borrowed funds increased $5,000 or 1.2% to $410,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $405,000 for the same period in
the prior year. This increase in interest expense can be attributed
to the increase in the average balance of borrowed funds of $18.2 million or
47.4% to $56.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to
$38.4 million for the same period in the prior year, contributing $156,000 in
additional expense. This volume increase was primarily related to the
funding of certain mortgage-backed investment security
purchases. Partially offsetting this volume increase, the cost of
borrowed funds decreased 131 basis points to 2.94% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, compared to 4.25% for the same period in 2008 causing a $151,000
decrease in interest expense. This cost decrease was a result of the
low rate environment during the second half of 2008 and 2009.
15
Average Balance Sheet and Yield/Rate
Analysis. The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, information concerning the total dollar amounts of interest income
from interest-earning assets and the resulting average yields, the total dollar
amounts of interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities and the resulting
average costs, net interest income, interest rate spread and the net interest
margin earned on average interest-earning assets. For purposes of
this table, average loan balances include non-accrual loans and exclude the
allowance for loan losses and interest income includes accretion of net deferred
loan fees. Interest and yields on tax-exempt loans and securities
(tax-exempt for federal income tax purposes) are shown on a fully tax equivalent
basis. The information is based on average daily balances during the
periods presented.
(Dollar amounts in
thousands)
|
Three months ended March
31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance |
Interest
|
Yield / Rate |
Average Balance |
Interest
|
Yield / Rate |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans,
taxable
|
$ | 263,114 | $ | 4,120 | 6.35 | % | $ | 227,600 | $ | 3,860 | 6.82 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans, tax
exempt
|
16,373 | 163 | 4.03 | % | 6,082 | 98 | 6.47 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total loans
receivable
|
279,487 | 4,283 | 6.22 | % | 233,682 | 3,958 | 6.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities,
taxable
|
47,128 | 529 | 4.55 | % | 32,664 | 378 | 4.65 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities, tax
exempt
|
13,652 | 220 | 6.54 | % | 14,361 | 233 | 6.53 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
securities
|
60,780 | 749 | 5.00 | % | 47,025 | 611 | 5.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning deposits with
banks
|
22,130 | 89 | 1.63 | % | 3,362 | 23 | 2.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal bank
stocks
|
3,797 | 5 | 0.53 | % | 2,518 | 30 | 4.79 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning cash
equivalents
|
25,927 | 94 | 1.47 | % | 5,880 | 53 | 3.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning
assets
|
366,194 | 5,126 | 5.68 | % | 286,587 | 4,622 | 6.49 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from
banks
|
2,173 | 5,224 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other noninterest-earning
assets
|
16,533 | 14,614 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 384,900 | $ | 306,425 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand
deposits
|
$ | 109,466 | 313 | 1.16 | % | $ | 78,962 | 282 | 1.44 | % | ||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
128,301 | 1,227 | 3.88 | % | 116,734 | 1,290 | 4.44 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing
deposits
|
237,767 | 1,540 | 2.63 | % | 195,696 | 1,572 | 3.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds,
short-term
|
21,536 | 24 | 0.45 | % | 3,351 | 4 | 0.48 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds,
long-term
|
35,000 | 386 | 4.48 | % | 35,000 | 401 | 4.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total borrowed
funds
|
56,536 | 410 | 2.94 | % | 38,351 | 405 | 4.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing
liabilities
|
294,303 | 1,950 | 2.69 | % | 234,047 | 1,977 | 3.40 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand
deposits
|
50,319 | - | - | 45,163 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Funding and cost of
funds
|
344,622 | 1,950 | 2.29 | % | 279,210 | 1,977 | 2.85 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other noninterest-bearing
liabilities
|
4,218 | 2,388 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Liabilities
|
348,840 | 281,598 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
Equity
|
36,060 | 24,827 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and
Stockholders' Equity
|
$ | 384,900 | $ | 306,425 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest
income
|
$ | 3,176 | $ | 2,645 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate
spread (difference
between
|
2.99 | % | 3.09 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
weighted average rate on
interest-earning
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
assets and interest-bearing
liabilities)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest
margin (net
interest
|
3.52 | % | 3.69 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
income as a percentage of
average
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
interest-earning
assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
16
Analysis of Changes in Net Interest
Income. The following table analyzes the changes in interest
income and interest expense in terms of: (1) changes in volume of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and (2) changes in
yields and rates. The table reflects the extent to which changes in
the Corporation’s interest income and interest expense are attributable to
changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by prior year volume), changes in
volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior year rate) and changes
attributable to the combined impact of volume/rate (change in rate multiplied by
change in volume). The changes attributable to the combined impact of
volume/rate are allocated on a consistent basis between the volume and rate
variances. Changes in interest income on loans and securities reflect
the changes in interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis.
(Dollar amounts in
thousands)
|
Three months ended March
31,
|
|||||||||||
2009 versus
2008
|
||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) due
to
|
||||||||||||
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Interest
income:
|
||||||||||||
Loans
|
$ | 726 | $ | (401 | ) | $ | 325 | |||||
Securities
|
171 | (33 | ) | 138 | ||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits with banks
|
79 | (13 | ) | 66 | ||||||||
Federal
bank stocks
|
10 | (35 | ) | (25 | ) | |||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
986 | (482 | ) | 504 | ||||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
304 | (336 | ) | (32 | ) | |||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
156 | (151 | ) | 5 | ||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
460 | (487 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||||
Net interest
income
|
$ | 526 | $ | 5 | $ | 531 | ||||||
Provision for loan
losses. The Corporation records provisions for loan losses to
maintain a level of total allowance for loan losses that management believes, to
the best of its knowledge, covers all known and inherent losses that are both
probable and reasonably estimable at each reporting date. Management
considers historical loss experience, the present and prospective financial
condition of borrowers, current conditions (particularly as they relate to
markets where the Corporation originates loans), the status of non-performing
assets, the estimated underlying value of the collateral and other factors
related to the collectibility of the loan portfolio.
Information
pertaining to the allowance for loan losses and non-performing assets for the
quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
At or for the three months
ended
|
|||||||
March 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Balance at the beginning of the
period
|
$ | 2,651 | $ | 2,157 | ||||
Provision for loan
losses
|
297 | 60 | ||||||
Charge-offs
|
(71 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Recoveries
|
8 | 11 | ||||||
Balance at the end of the
period
|
$ | 2,885 | $ | 2,219 | ||||
Non-performing
loans
|
$ | 1,747 | $ | 855 | ||||
Non-performing
assets
|
1,857 | 979 | ||||||
Non-performing loans to total
loans
|
0.63 | % | 0.36 | % | ||||
Non-performing assets to total
assets
|
0.49 | % | 0.30 | % | ||||
Allowance for loan losses to total
loans
|
1.04 | % | 0.94 | % | ||||
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans
|
165.14 | % | 259.53 | % |
17
The
provision for loan losses increased $237,000 to $297,000 for the three month
period ended March 31, 2009 from $60,000 for the same period in the prior
year. This increase was attributable to the aforementioned loan
growth and management’s estimates of the impact on the loan portfolio of credit
defaults related to the prevailing poor economic climate.
Noninterest
income. Noninterest income increased $60,000 or 9.1% to
$720,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $660,000
during the same period in the prior year. This increase can primarily
be attributed to gains recorded in 2009 related to the sale of investment
securities and the sale of the former ECSLA building, partially offset by a
decrease in commissions earned associated with the Bank’s financial services
division.
Noninterest
expense. Noninterest expense increased $209,000 or 8.7% to
$2.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $2.4
million for the same period in 2008. This increase in noninterest
expense can be attributed to an increase in compensation and employee benefits,
premises and equipment and other noninterest expenses of $21,000, $61,000 and
$127,000, respectively.
Compensation
and employee benefits increased $21,000 or 1.5% to $1.4 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009. This increase can be attributed
primarily to normal salary and wage increases.
Premises
and equipment increased $61,000 or 14.5% to $481,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, compared to $420,000 for the same period in the prior
year. This increase was primarily related to costs associated with
the addition of the Grove City, Pennsylvania office that opened in
second-quarter 2008.
Other
noninterest expense increased $127,000 or 22.0% to $703,000 during the three
months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $576,000 for the same period in the
prior year. This increase was primarily associated with an increase
in professional fees related to the Bank’s proposed purchase of a branch office
in Titusville, Pennsylvania and an increase in FDIC expense. Due to
assessment credits that partially offset FDIC premiums in 2008 as well as
deposit insurance premium increased effective for 2009 and possible emergency
assessments, FDIC insurance expense will be significantly higher in 2009 than in
previous periods.
Provision for income
taxes. The provision for income taxes increased $23,000 or
13.5% to $194,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to
$171,000 for the same period in the prior year. This was due to an
increase in pre-tax earnings of $132,000 or 18.1% to $862,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $730,000 for the same period in the
prior year and a decrease in the effective tax rate to 22.5% for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, compared to 23.4% for the same period in
2008. The difference between the statutory rate of 34% and the
Corporation’s effective tax rate is due to tax-exempt income earned on certain
tax-free loans and securities and bank-owned life insurance.
LIQUIDITY
The
Corporation’s primary sources of funds generally have been deposits obtained
through the offices of the Bank, borrowings from the FHLB and amortization and
prepayments of outstanding loans and maturing securities. During the
three months ended March 31, 2009, the Corporation used its sources of funds
primarily to fund loan originations and security purchases. As of
such date, the Corporation had outstanding loan commitments, including
undisbursed loans and amounts available under credit lines, totaling $24.0
million, and standby letters of credit totaling $1.0 million.
At March
31, 2009, time deposits amounted to $131.0 million or 44.4% of the Corporation’s
total consolidated deposits, including approximately $46.2 million of which are
scheduled to mature within the next year. Management of the
Corporation believes that it has adequate resources to fund all of its
commitments, that all of its commitments will be funded as required by related
maturity dates and that, based upon past experience and current pricing
policies, it can adjust the rates of time deposits to retain a substantial
portion of maturing liabilities.
18
Aside
from liquidity available from customer deposits or through sales and maturities
of securities, the Corporation has alternative sources of funds such as a term
borrowing capacity from the FHLB and the Federal Reserve’s Treasury Auction
Facility. At March 31, 2009, the Corporation’s borrowing capacity
with the FHLB, net of funds borrowed, was $195.9 million.
Management is not aware of any
conditions, including any regulatory recommendations or requirements, which
would adversely impact its liquidity or its ability to meet funding needs in the
ordinary course of business.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management
views critical accounting policies to be those which are highly dependent on
subjective or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions and where changes in
those estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on the financial
statements. Management currently views the determination of the
allowance for loan losses and the evaluation of securities for other than
temporary impairment as critical accounting policies.
The
allowance for loan losses provides for an estimate of probable losses in the
loan portfolio. In determining the appropriate level of the allowance
for loan losses, the loan portfolio is separated into risk-rated and homogeneous
pools. Migration analysis/historical loss rates, adjusted for
relevant trends, have been applied to these pools. Qualitative
adjustments are then applied to the portfolio to allow for quality of lending
policies and procedures, national and local economic and business conditions,
changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio, experience, ability and depth
of lending management, changes in the trends, volumes and severity of past due,
non-accrual and classified loans and loss and recovery trends, quality of the
Corporation’s loan review system, concentrations of credit, and external
factors. The methodology used to determine the adequacy of the
Corporation’s allowance for loan losses is comprehensive and meets regulatory
and accounting industry standards for assessing the allowance, however, it is
still an estimate. Loan losses are charged against the allowance
while recoveries of amounts previously charged-off are credited to the
allowance. Loan loss provisions are charged against current earnings
based on management’s periodic evaluation and review of the factors indicated
above.
Management
evaluates securities for other than temporary impairment at least on a quarterly
basis, and more frequently when economic, market or other concerns warrant such
evaluation. Consideration is given to: (1) the length of time and the
extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and (3) the intent and ability
of the Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Market risk for the Corporation consists
primarily of interest rate risk exposure and liquidity risk. Since
virtually all of the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities
are at the Bank, virtually all of the interest rate risk and liquidity risk lies
at the Bank level. The Bank is not subject to currency exchange risk
or commodity price risk, and has no trading portfolio, and therefore, is not
subject to any trading risk. In addition, the Bank does not
participate in hedging transactions such as interest rate swaps and
caps. Changes in interest rates will impact both income and expense
recorded and also the market value of long-term interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. Interest rate risk and liquidity risk
management is performed at the Bank level. Although the Bank has a
diversified loan portfolio, loans outstanding to individuals and businesses
depend upon the local economic conditions in the immediate trade
area.
One of the primary functions of the
Corporation’s asset/liability management committee is to monitor the level to
which the balance sheet is subject to interest rate risk. The goal of
the asset/liability committee is to manage the relationship between interest
rate sensitive assets and liabilities, thereby minimizing the fluctuations in
the net interest margin, which achieves consistent growth of net interest income
during periods of changing interest rates.
19
Interest rate sensitivity is the result
of differences in the amounts and repricing dates of the Bank’s rate sensitive
assets and rate sensitive liabilities. These differences, or interest
rate repricing “gap”, provide an indication of the extent that the Corporation’s
net interest income is affected by future changes in interest
rates. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest
rate-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities
and is considered negative when the amount of interest rate-sensitive
liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive
assets. Generally, during a period of rising interest rates, a
negative gap would adversely affect net interest income while a positive gap
would result in an increase in net interest income. Conversely,
during a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would result in an
increase in net interest income and a positive gap would adversely affect net
interest income. The closer to zero that gap is maintained,
generally, the lesser the impact of market interest rate changes on net interest
income.
Based on certain assumptions provided by
a federal regulatory agency, which management believes most accurately
represents the sensitivity of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities to
interest rate changes, at March 31, 2009, the Corporation’s
interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within one year totaled
$156.3 million while the Corporation’s
interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within one-year totaled
$114.8 million, providing an excess of
interest-earning assets over interest-bearing liabilities of $41.5 million. At March 31, 2009, the percentage of the Corporation’s
assets to liabilities maturing or repricing within one year was 136.2%.
For more information, see “Market Risk
Management” in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Item
4T. Controls and Procedures
The Corporation maintains disclosure
controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed in the Corporation’s Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the
Corporation’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and
Principal Accounting Officer (PAO), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure based on the definition of “disclosure controls
and procedures” in Rule 13a-15(e).
There has been no change made in the
Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting during the period
covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial
reporting.
As of March 31, 2009, the Corporation
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
the Corporation’s management, including the Corporation’s CEO and PAO, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure
controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Corporation’s
CEO and PAO concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures
were effective. There have been no significant changes in the
Corporation’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect the internal controls subsequent to the date the Corporation completed
its evaluation.
PART II - OTHER
INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal
Proceedings
The
Corporation is involved in various legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary
course of business. It is the opinion of management, after
consultation with legal counsel, that these matters will not materially effect
the Corporation’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
There
have been no material changes in the Corporation’s risk factors from those
previously disclosed in the 2008 Form 10-K.
20
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
None.
Item 5. Other
Information
(a)
|
Not
applicable.
|
(b)
|
Not
applicable.
|
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibit
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive
Officer
|
Exhibit
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Accounting
Officer
|
Exhibit
32.1
|
CEO
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350
|
Exhibit
32.2
|
CFO
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350
|
21
Signatures
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
EMCLAIRE
FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Date: May
14, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ William C. Marsh
|
|
William
C. Marsh
|
|||
Chairman
of the Board,
|
|||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|||
Date: May
14, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Amanda L. Engles
|
|
Amanda
L. Engles
|
|||
Treasurer
and Principal Accounting Officer
|
22