ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2008 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission file number 0-12957
Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 22-2372868 | |
(State of incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
685 Route 202/206, Bridgewater, New Jersey | 08807 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(908) 541-8600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Shares of
Common Stock outstanding as of May 7, 2008: 44,732,973.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2008 | December 31, 2007* | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 62,694 | $ | 40,053 | ||||
Short-term investments |
66,360 | 123,907 | ||||||
Restricted investments and cash |
14,452 | 73,592 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $273 at March 31, 2008
and $280 at December 31, 2007 |
16,199 | 14,927 | ||||||
Inventories |
19,284 | 22,297 | ||||||
Other current assets |
7,966 | 6,401 | ||||||
Total current assets |
186,955 | 281,177 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation of $39,131 at March 31, 2008 and
$37,031 at December 31, 2007 |
45,269 | 45,312 | ||||||
Marketable securities |
55,308 | 20,653 | ||||||
Amortizable intangible assets, net |
65,559 | 68,141 | ||||||
Other assets |
4,798 | 5,074 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 357,889 | $ | 420,357 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 5,545 | $ | 9,441 | ||||
Notes payable |
12,521 | 72,391 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
21,073 | 23,650 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
39,139 | 105,482 | ||||||
Notes payable |
275,000 | 275,000 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
3,637 | 3,302 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
317,776 | 383,784 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock $.01 par value, authorized
3,000,000 shares; no shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2008 and December
31, 2007 |
| | ||||||
Common stock $.01 par value, authorized
170,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding
44,658,901 shares at March 31, 2008
and 44,199,831 shares at December 31, 2007 |
447 | 442 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
337,418 | 335,318 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
245 | 326 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(297,997 | ) | (299,513 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
40,113 | 36,573 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 357,889 | $ | 420,357 | ||||
* | Condensed from audited financial statements. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
Table of Contents
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Product sales, net |
$ | 27,429 | $ | 22,649 | ||||
Royalties |
14,700 | 16,344 | ||||||
Contract manufacturing |
6,644 | 2,495 | ||||||
Total revenues |
48,773 | 41,488 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||
Cost of product sales and contract manufacturing |
16,139 | 11,464 | ||||||
Research and development |
13,184 | 13,240 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
15,393 | 17,123 | ||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
167 | 185 | ||||||
Restructuring charge |
1,254 | 569 | ||||||
Total costs and expenses |
46,137 | 42,581 | ||||||
Operating income (loss) |
2,636 | (1,093 | ) | |||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Investment income, net |
2,179 | 2,577 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(3,385 | ) | (4,553 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
296 | 90 | ||||||
(910 | ) | (1,886 | ) | |||||
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit) |
1,726 | (2,979 | ) | |||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
210 | (193 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,516 | $ | (2,786 | ) | |||
Earnings (loss) per common share basic |
$ | 0.03 | $ | (0.06 | ) | |||
Earnings (loss) per common share diluted |
$ | 0.03 | $ | (0.06 | ) | |||
Weighted average shares basic |
44,166 | 43,862 | ||||||
Weighted average shares diluted |
44,737 | 43,862 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
Table of Contents
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,516 | $ | (2,786 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,456 | 3,997 | ||||||
Share-based compensation |
2,154 | 3,017 | ||||||
Write-off of assets |
226 | | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
425 | 438 | ||||||
Gain on redemption of notes payable |
(371 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||
Amortization of debt securities premium/discount |
(1,189 | ) | 82 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
(6,496 | ) | (19,705 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
721 | (15,021 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(2,057 | ) | (6,352 | ) | ||||
Purchase of product rights |
| (17,500 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities |
50,297 | 67,355 | ||||||
Purchase of marketable securities |
(58,557 | ) | (90,695 | ) | ||||
Maturities of marketable securities |
91,400 | 59,792 | ||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
81,083 | 12,600 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Redemption of notes payable |
(59,499 | ) | (3,936 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan |
336 | | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options |
| 286 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(59,163 | ) | (3,650 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
22,641 | (6,071 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
40,053 | 28,431 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 62,694 | $ | 22,360 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
Table of Contents
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
(1) Organization and Basis of Presentation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the books
and records of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Enzon or the Company) in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial
information and Rule 10-01 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes
required for complete annual financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal and recurring
adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Interim results are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year. The interim
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
(2) New Accounting Standards
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions related to financial assets and
liabilities of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
(SFAS No. 157), as amended. SFAS No. 157 provides guidance on the use of fair value in accounting
and disclosure for assets and liabilities when such accounting and disclosure is called for by
other accounting literature. As amended by Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff
Position (FSP) 157-2, the applicability of SFAS No. 157 for most nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities has been delayed to 2009 for calendar-year companies.
Enzon currently has no financial assets or liabilities for which it recognizes in earnings
periodic gains or losses resulting from fair value fluctuations. Short-term investments and
marketable securities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets with temporary
gains and losses reflected in other comprehensive income. Apart from these financial assets, the
Company has no significant assets or liabilities that it expects will be affected in 2009 when SFAS
No. 157 becomes fully effective.
The Company also adopted, as of January 1, 2008, SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159) and Emerging Issues Task Force No. 07-3
(EITF 07-3), Accounting for Advance Payments for Goods and Services to Be Used in Future Research
and Development Activities. SFAS No. 159 permits companies to measure many financial assets and
liabilities at fair value on a contract-by-contract basis in order to prevent distortions in
earnings in the event certain other instruments in the balance sheet are marked-to-market through
earnings. EITF 07-3 calls for capitalization of non-refundable advance payments to acquire goods
or pay for services that will be consumed or performed in future periods in conducting research and
development activities and to amortize them over the period of expected benefit. The Companys
adoption of SFAS No. 159 and EITF 07-3 did not have an impact on its financial statements.
(3) Investments and Marketable Securities
The Company classifies its investments in debt and equity securities as either short-term or
long-term based upon their stated maturities and the Companys intent and ability to hold them.
Investments with stated maturities of one year or less are classified as current assets.
Investments in debt securities with stated maturities greater than one year and marketable equity
securities are classified as noncurrent assets when the Company has the intent and ability to hold
such securities for at least one year.
The cost of the debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of
discounts to maturity. The amortization and accretion, along with realized gains and losses, are
included in investment income, net. The cost of securities is based on the specific identification
method.
5
Table of Contents
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Investments in marketable equity securities and debt securities, including auction rate
securities are classified as available-for-sale. Debt and marketable equity securities are carried
at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses (which are deemed to be temporary), net of
related tax effect, when appropriate, included in the determination of other comprehensive income
and reported in stockholders equity.
Fair value is determined in accordance with SFAS No. 157. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair
value hierarchy based upon the level of market observability used in determining the investments
fair value. The highest level is that which is derived from readily available quoted prices in
active markets (Level 1). As the table below indicates, the majority of the Companys investments
and marketable securities fall into Level 1. Recently, due to instability in the financial
markets, failed auctions for a certain auction rate security have occurred and, as a result, the
Company has had to seek alternative measures of fair value which were deemed to be Level 2.
The table below indicates the
fair value measurements employed as of March 31, 2008 (in
thousands):
Quoted | ||||||||||||
Prices | Significant | |||||||||||
in Active | Other | |||||||||||
Markets for | Observable | |||||||||||
Identical Assets | Inputs | |||||||||||
(Level 1) | (Level 2) | Total | ||||||||||
U.S. corporate debt |
$ | 111,719 | $ | | $ | 111,719 | ||||||
Auction rate securities |
6,450 | 1,230 | 7,680 | |||||||||
Other |
2,269 | | 2,269 | |||||||||
$ | 120,438 | $ | 1,230 | $ | 121,668 | |||||||
The auction rate securities are rated AAA or AA and are variable rate debt instruments for
which interest rates are reset approximately every 28 days. The underlying securities have
contractual maturities that are long-term, but because of the historical ability to liquidate
holdings at the time of the periodic auctions, they have been classified as short-term,
available-for-sale securities.
The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains or losses, and fair value of the Companys
available-for-sale securities by major security type at March 31, 2008 were as follows (in
thousands):
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Holding Gains | Holding Losses | Value* | |||||||||||||
U.S. corporate debt |
$ | 111,670 | $ | 339 | $ | (290 | ) | $ | 111,719 | |||||||
Auction rate securities |
7,950 | | (270 | ) | 7,680 | |||||||||||
Other |
2,018 | 284 | (33 | ) | 2,269 | |||||||||||
$ | 121,638 | $ | 623 | $ | (593 | ) | $ | 121,668 | ||||||||
* | Includes short-term investments of $66,360 and marketable securities of $55,308 at March 31, 2008. |
6
Table of Contents
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains or losses, and fair value of the Companys
available-for-sale securities by major security type at December 31, 2007 were as follows (in
thousands):
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Holding Gains | Holding Losses | Value* | |||||||||||||
U.S. Government and GSE debt |
$ | 9,796 | $ | 2 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | 9,779 | |||||||
U.S. corporate debt |
136,037 | 83 | (97 | ) | 136,023 | |||||||||||
Auction rate securities |
51,375 | | (240 | ) | 51,135 | |||||||||||
Other |
2,308 | 333 | | 2,641 | ||||||||||||
$ | 199,516 | $ | 418 | $ | (356 | ) | $ | 199,578 | ||||||||
* | Includes short-term investments of $123,907, restricted investments of $55,018 and marketable securities of $20,653 at December 31, 2007. |
Restricted investments and cash are held in a separate account for the sole purpose of
repayment or repurchase of the Companys 4.5% convertible subordinated notes due July 1, 2008. As
of March 31, 2008, all restricted investments had been liquidated leaving only restricted cash
amounting to $14.5 million. As of December 31, 2007, restricted investments amounted to $55.0
million of which $29.0 million was held in auction rate securities and restricted cash amounted to
$18.6 million.
Other securities include investments of participants in the Companys Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan (predominantly mutual fund shares) totaling $2.0 million as of March 31, 2008 and
$2.3 million as of December 31, 2007. The assets of the deferred compensation plan also include
cash ($1.4 million and $0.6 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively). There
is a non-current liability that offsets the aggregate deferred compensation plan assets. In
addition, other securities included $0.3 million of corporate equity securities as of March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007.
Maturities of marketable debt securities, excluding securities related to the Companys
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, at March 31, 2008 were as follows (in thousands):
Twelve-Month | ||||||||
Periods Ending | Amortized | Fair | ||||||
March
31, |
Cost | Value | ||||||
2009 |
$ | 66,171 | $ | 66,076 | ||||
2010 |
45,118 | 45,042 | ||||||
2011 |
8,331 | 8,281 | ||||||
$ | 119,620 | $ | 119,399 | |||||
Impairment assessments are made at the individual security level each reporting period. When
the fair value of an investment is less than its cost at the balance sheet date, a determination is
made as to whether the impairment is other than temporary and, if it is other than temporary, an
impairment loss is recognized in earnings equal to the difference between the investments cost and
fair value at such date. The Company has determined that there were no other-than-temporary
declines in the fair values of its marketable securities and short-term investments as of March 31,
2008.
7
Table of Contents
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair values of the Companys
available-for-sale securities (both short-term and long-term) aggregated by investment category and
length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position at March 31, 2008
(in thousands):
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | |||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||
Value | Loss | Value | Loss | |||||||||||||
U.S. corporate debt (1) |
$ | 38,856 | $ | (289 | ) | $ | 3,998 | $ | (1 | ) | ||||||
Auction rate securities (2) |
1,230 | (270 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Other (3) |
1,985 | (33 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 42,071 | $ | (592 | ) | $ | 3,998 | $ | (1 | ) | ||||||
(1) U.S. corporate debt. The
unrealized losses of $290,000 on the U.S. corporate debt
were attributable to increases in interest rates, as well as bond pricing. The Company invests in
bonds and notes that are rated A or better, as dictated by its investment policy. Since the changes in the
market value of these investments are due to changes in interest rates and not the credit quality
of the issuer, and the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until recovery
of the cost, the Company does not consider its investments in U.S. corporate debt to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2008.
(2) The Companys investments in auction rate securities are rated AAA or AA. Starting
in the latter part of 2007, auctions for one such security, having a cost basis of $1.5 million,
have not been successful. When auctions are not successful, the interest rate on this investment
increases as does the risk associated with its illiquidity. The Company has reported this security
at an estimated fair value as provided by its investment advisers and recognized the unrealized
loss in other comprehensive income. The estimated fair value (Level 2) of the impaired auction
rate security declined two percent during the first quarter of 2008. The Company has the intent
and ability to hold this investment until recovery of the cost and, based upon available
information at this time, does not believe the impairment to be other than temporary. The Company
will continue to monitor this security and will recognize an impairment loss in earnings if it is
determined to be permanent. Auctions generally occur at regular intervals of 28 days.
(3) The Companys investments in other securities relate to the Companys Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan.
(4) Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table reconciles net income (loss) to comprehensive income (loss) (in
thousands):
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,516 | $ | (2,786 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income
unrealized (loss)
gain on available-for-sale securities that arose during the period, net of tax (1) |
(81 | ) | 441 | |||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 1,435 | $ | (2,345 | ) | |||
(1) | Information has not been tax-effected due to an estimated annual effective tax rate of zero. |
8
Table of Contents
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(5) Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) available
to common stockholders, by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during
the period. Restricted stock awards and restricted stock units (collectively, nonvested shares)
are not considered to be outstanding shares until the service vesting period has been completed.
For purposes of calculating diluted earnings (loss) per common share, the denominator includes both
the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding and the number of common stock
equivalents if the inclusion of such common stock equivalents is dilutive. Dilutive common stock
equivalents potentially include non-qualified stock options, nonvested shares, shares issuable
under the employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) and the number of shares issuable upon conversion of
the Companys convertible subordinated notes payable and/or convertible senior notes payable. In
the case of notes payable, the diluted earnings per share calculation is further affected by an
add-back of interest to the numerator under the assumption that the interest would not have been
incurred if the notes payable were converted into common stock.
The dilutive effect of stock options and nonvested shares takes into account a number of
treasury shares calculated using assumed proceeds. Assumed proceeds include compensation costs to
be attributed to future service and not yet recognized, the cash paid by the holders of stock
options to exercise, withholding and contributions pursuant to the ESPP and the excess, if any, of
tax benefits that would be credited to additional paid-in capital, related to share-based
compensation.
For the three-months ended March 31, 2008, approximately 571 thousand weighted-average
nonvested shares constituted the only dilutive incremental common share equivalents and had no
effect on the diluted earnings per share computation (38.4 million were anti-dilutive). As a
result, basic and diluted earnings per share were both $0.03 per share for the three months ended
March 31, 2008. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company reported a loss.
Accordingly, all potentially dilutive common share equivalents (40.6 million) were anti-dilutive
resulting in basic and diluted loss per share of $(0.06) per share for the three months ended March
31, 2007.
(6) Share-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for share-based compensation, including options and nonvested shares,
according to the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. During the quarters ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $2.1 million
and $3.0 million, respectively. The weighted
average grant price of the options granted was $9.37 per share and fair value was $3.53 per share
or $450,000 fair value in total during the quarter ended March 31, 2008. The nonvested shares
granted during the quarter had a weighted average grant-date fair value of $9.30 per share.
Activity in options and nonvested shares during the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 and related balances outstanding as of that date
are reflected below (in thousands):
Nonvested | ||||||||
Options | Shares | |||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 |
8,385 | 1,774 | ||||||
Granted |
127 | 402 | ||||||
Exercised and vested |
| (119 | ) | |||||
Expired and forfeited |
(27 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2008 |
8,485 | 2,049 | ||||||
Options vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2008 |
7,737 | |||||||
Options exercisable at March 31, 2008 |
5,655 | |||||||
9
Table of Contents
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
As of March 31, 2008, there was $8.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to unvested options that the Company expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 19
months and $12.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested shares to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 28 months.
(7) Inventories
As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 inventories consisted of the following (in
thousands):
March 31, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 7,252 | $ | 9,809 | ||||
Work in process |
5,377 | 5,419 | ||||||
Finished goods |
6,655 | 7,069 | ||||||
$ | 19,284 | $ | 22,297 | |||||
(8) Intangible Assets
As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 intangible assets consisted of the following (in
thousands):
Weighted | ||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||
Remaining | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | Useful Lives | ||||||||||
Product acquisition costs |
$ | 78,694 | $ | 78,694 | 6.4 years | |||||||
Product patented technology |
6,000 | 6,000 | 6.8 years | |||||||||
Manufacturing patent |
9,000 | 9,000 | 6.8 years | |||||||||
Patent |
1,875 | 1,875 | * | |||||||||
95,569 | 95,569 | 6.4 years | ||||||||||
Less: Accumulated
amortization |
30,010 | 27,428 | ||||||||||
$ | 65,559 | $ | 68,141 | |||||||||
* fully amortized
Amortization of intangibles amounted to $2.6 million for each of the quarters ended March 31,
2008 and March 31, 2007. Of this amount, $2.4 million was classified as cost of product sales and
contract manufacturing.
(9) Notes Payable
The table below reflects the composition of the notes payable balances as of March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
March 31, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||
Current |
||||||||
4.5% Convertible Subordinated Notes due July 1, 2008 |
$ | 12,521 | $ | 72,391 | ||||
Long-Term |
||||||||
4% Convertible Senior Notes due June 1, 2013 |
$ | 275,000 | $ | 275,000 | ||||
10
Table of Contents
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The 4.5% notes mature on July 1, 2008 and are convertible, at the option of the holders, into
common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $70.98 per share at any time on or before July
1, 2008. The 4.5% notes are subordinated to all existing and future senior indebtedness. Upon
occurrence of a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture governing the notes, holders of
the notes may require the Company to redeem the notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal
amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company may redeem any or all of the 4.5% notes at
specified redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the day preceding the redemption
date. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased $59.9 million principal amount of
the 4.5% notes payable for $59.5 million. Because the 4.5% notes mature in less than twelve months
from the respective balance sheet dates, they are classified as current liabilities.
Approximately $14.5 million and $73.6 million needed for repayment or repurchase of the remaining
balance of the 4.5% notes payable outstanding as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively, was set aside and stated separately on the consolidated balance sheets as restricted
investments and cash. The assets in this segregated account may be used only for purposes of
retiring the 4.5% notes.
The 4% notes mature on June 1, 2013, unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or converted. The
4% notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equal to other senior unsecured debt of the
Company and all future senior unsecured debt of the Company. The 4% notes may be converted at the
option of the holders into the Companys common stock at an initial conversion price of $9.55 per
share.
At any time on or after June 1, 2009, if the closing price of the Companys common stock for
at least 20 trading days in the 30-consecutive-trading-day period ending on the date one day prior
to the date of a notice of redemption is greater than 140% of the applicable conversion price on
the date of such notice, the Company, at its option, may redeem the 4% notes in whole or in part,
at a redemption price in cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 4% notes to be redeemed,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. The 4% notes are not redeemable
prior to June 1, 2009. Upon occurrence of a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture
governing the 4% notes, holders of the notes may require the Company to redeem the notes at a price
equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest or, in certain cases, to
convert the notes at an increased conversion rate based on the price paid per share of the
Companys common stock in the transaction constituting the fundamental change.
In connection with the Companys 2006 issuance of $275.0 million of the 4% notes, the Company
entered into a registration rights agreement whereby it agreed to file a shelf registration
statement with the SEC to permit the registered resale of the 4% notes and the common stock
issuable upon conversion of the notes. The shelf registration was filed in a timely manner on
October 2, 2006 and was declared effective by the SEC on November 3, 2006. Failure to maintain the
effectiveness of the registration statement for a period of two years beginning November 3, 2006
would result in additional interest of up to $0.8 million being payable on the 4% notes as of March
31, 2008. No amounts are owed, nor have any been recorded, for
failure to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement.
Interest
on the 4.5% notes
is payable January 1 and July 1 of each year. Accrued interest on
the 4.5% notes was $141,000 as of March 31, 2008 and $1.6 million as of December 31, 2007.
Interest on the 4% notes is payable on June 1 and December 1 of each year. As of March 31, 2008
accrued interest on the 4% notes amounted to $3.7 million and $1.0 million at December 31, 2007.
The
Company evaluates the accounting
for the conversion features of its 4.5% and 4% convertible notes in accordance with
EITF No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock. The Company concluded that no beneficial
conversion feature existed at the inception of the notes. If the conversion features are required
to be bifurcated in the future, changes in the fair value of the conversion features would be
included in operations in each period.
11
Table of Contents
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(10) Restructuring
During the first quarter of 2007, the Company announced plans to consolidate manufacturing
operations in its Indianapolis, Indiana location. This action was taken as part of the Companys
continued efforts to streamline operations.
All operations at the Companys South Plainfield, New Jersey facility are expected to be
transferred to the Companys Indianapolis facility in 2008, resulting in the incurrence and full
accrual of certain restructuring and exit costs. Among these costs will be employee severance and
related benefits for affected employees. These amounts will be paid over a period of time
commencing upon the successful transfer of production to the Companys Indianapolis facility and
closure of the South Plainfield facility in 2008.
During 2007, the Company recognized $0.4 million of employee severance and related benefits
when it combined its previous two specialized sales forces into one sales team.
The Company incurred the following costs in connection with its restructuring programs during
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and from inception of the restructuring programs through
December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||
March 31, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | Total | ||||||||||
Employee termination costs manufacturing |
$ | 1,028 | $ | 2,232 | $ | 3,260 | ||||||
sales forces |
| 385 | 385 | |||||||||
Write-down of manufacturing assets |
226 | 5,124 | 5,350 | |||||||||
$ | 1,254 | $ | 7,741 | $ | 8,995 | |||||||
The above amounts for employee termination benefits are reflected in accrued expenses -
current ($3.6 million as of March 31, 2008 and $2.6 million as of December 31, 2007). There have
been no adjustments of the amounts accrued.
In addition to the restructuring charges described above, costs incurred during 2007 related
to validation batches at the Indianapolis facility for Oncaspar and Adagen, were expensed and
included in cost of product sales in the amount of $1.9 million.
The Company will likely experience additional costs associated with lease termination or
sublease of the South Plainfield facility. Such costs will be incurred and recognized when the
Company ceases use of the property in 2008. However, the Company does not know at this time what
the final use or disposition of the leased South Plainfield facility will be.
12
Table of Contents
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(11) Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The Company considers all highly liquid investment securities with original maturities of
three months or less to be cash equivalents. For each of the three-month periods ended March 31,
2008 and 2007, there were payments of interest on the Companys notes payable of $1.7 million and
$2.8 million, respectively. Income tax payments for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007, were $1.9 million and $294,000, respectively.
(12) Income Taxes
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company recorded a net tax expense of
$210,000 which represents Canadian tax liabilities. During the three months ended March 31, 2007,
the Company recognized a tax benefit of $193,000 representing state and Canadian tax liabilities as
well as an adjustment to taxes payable. The Company did not recognize a U.S. Federal income tax
provision for these periods as the estimated annual effective tax
rate was zero. As of March 31,
2008, the Company continues to provide a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets
since the Company believes it is more likely than not its deferred tax assets will not be realized.
(13) Segment Information
The Company operates in the following business and reportable segments:
Products - The Products segment performs the manufacturing, development, marketing and selling
of pharmaceutical products for patients with cancer or other life-threatening diseases. Currently,
the Company has developed or acquired four therapeutic products approved by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration focused primarily in oncology and other life-threatening diseases. The Company
currently markets its products through its specialized U.S. sales force that calls upon specialists
in oncology, hematology, infectious disease and other critical care disciplines. The Companys
four proprietary marketed brands are Oncaspar, DepoCyt, Abelcet and Adagen.
Royalties - The Company receives royalties on the manufacture and sale of products that
utilize its proprietary technology. Royalty revenues are currently derived from sales of products
that use the Companys PEGylation platform, namely PEG-INTRON marketed by Schering-Plough, Macugen
marketed by OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Pfizer Inc. and Pegasys marketed by Hoffmann-La Roche.
Through an agreement with Nektar, the Company shares in Nektars royalties on sales of Pegasys and
Macugen which utilize Enzon technology.
Contract Manufacturing - The Company manufactures products for third parties. It manufactures
for Cephalon, Abelcet for export and MYOCET. It also produces the injectable multivitamin,
MVI®, for Hospira, Inc.
The performance of each of the Companys segments is monitored by the Companys chief
operating decision maker, the President and Chief Executive Officer. Segment profit (loss) is
measured based on operating results, excluding investment income, interest expense and income
taxes. The Companys research and development expense is considered a corporate expense until a
product candidate enters Phase III clinical trials at which time related costs would be chargeable
to one of the Companys operating segments. The Company does not identify or allocate property and
equipment by operating segment, and does not allocate depreciation to the operating segments.
Operating segments do not have intersegment revenue, and accordingly, there is none to be reported.
13
Table of Contents
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The following table presents segment revenues and profitability information for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
Contract | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment |
Products | Royalties | Manufacturing | Corporate(1) | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
2008 | $ | 27,429 | $ | 14,700 | $ | 6,644 | $ | | $ | 48,773 | |||||||||||||
2007 | $ | 22,649 | $ | 16,344 | $ | 2,495 | $ | | $ | 41,488 | ||||||||||||||
Profit
(loss) |
2008 | $ | 3,085 | $ | 14,700 | $ | 2,110 | $ | (18,169 | ) | $ | 1,726 | ||||||||||||
2007 | $ | 2,366 | $ | 16,344 | $ | 41 | $ | (21,730 | ) | $ | (2,979 | ) |
(1) Corporate expenses include
operating (loss) income components that are not
directly attributable to an operating segment, including general and administrative expenses,
treasury activities and exploratory, preclinical and clinical research and development not
specifically identifiable with existing marketed products or product candidates that have not
entered phase III clinical trials.
Following is a reconciliation of segment profit to consolidated income (loss) before income
tax provision (benefit) (in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Segment profit |
$ | 19,895 | $ | 18,751 | ||||
Unallocated operating expense |
(17,259 | ) | (19,844 | ) | ||||
Operating income (loss) |
2,636 | (1,093 | ) | |||||
Other corporate income (expense) |
(910 | ) | (1,886 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) before income tax
provision (benefit) |
$ | 1,726 | $ | (2,979 | ) | |||
(14)
Subsequent Event
On
May 7, 2008, the Company announced that the Board of Directors has authorized a plan to spin-off its biotechnology
business in a transaction that will result in two
independent public companies. The newly independent biotechnology business will be
engaged in research and development of Enzons existing
PEGylation and Locked Nucleic Acid technologies, among others, for
licensing, collaboration and future royalty generation. Enzon will
retain the current marketed products, Abelcet, Adagen, DepoCyt and
Oncaspar, the rights to current PEG royalty revenues, including
PEG-INTRON, Cimzia and Hematide, and its manufacturing facility in
Indianapolis, Indiana. Enzons outstanding convertible notes
will remain an obligation of Enzon. Completion of the spin-off is
subject to numerous conditions, including final approval by the Board
of Directors, the filing and effectiveness of a registration
statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any
necessary third-party consents. The Company is currently evaluating
the tax status of the stock distribution. It is expected that the
spin-off will be completed in the fourth quarter of 2008.
14
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the development, manufacturing and
commercialization of important medicines for patients with cancer and other life-threatening
conditions. We operate in three business segments: Products, Royalties and Contract
Manufacturing. We have a portfolio of four marketed products, Oncaspar, DepoCyt, Abelcet and
Adagen. Our drug development programs utilize several cutting-edge approaches, including our
industry-leading PEGylation technology platform used to create product candidates with benefits
such as reduced dosing frequency and less toxicity. Our PEGylation technology was used to develop
two of our products, Oncaspar and Adagen, and has created a royalty revenue stream from licensing
partnerships for other products developed using the technology. Enzon also engages in contract
manufacturing opportunities for several pharmaceutical companies to broaden the Companys revenue
base.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
Overview
Total revenue rose $7.3 million or 18% in the first quarter of 2008 to $48.8 million compared
to the $41.5 million recorded in the first quarter of 2007.
Increased revenues from Oncaspar, coupled
with increased contract manufacturing revenue was offset, in part, by the reduction in royalty
revenue resulting from the 2007 sale of a partial interest in PEG-INTRON royalties.
First-quarter 2008 pretax operating results were income of $1.7 million whereas the first
quarter of 2007 generated a pretax loss of $3.0 million. The favorable change was largely the
result of higher levels of product and contract manufacturing sales. In addition, selling, general
and administrative expenses declined on a period-over-period basis as did interest expense. These
favorable fluctuations were partly offset by a higher restructuring charge in 2008.
Further analysis of these operating results comparisons is provided below.
Following is a reconciliation of segment profitability to consolidated income (loss) before
income tax (millions of dollars):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March | % | March | ||||||||||
2008 | Change | 2007 | ||||||||||
Products Segment profit |
$ | 3.0 | 30 | $ | 2.4 | |||||||
Royalty Segment profit |
14.7 | (10 | ) | 16.3 | ||||||||
Contract Manufacturing Segment profit |
2.1 | n.m. | | |||||||||
Corporate and other expenses* |
(18.1 | ) | (16 | ) | (21.7 | ) | ||||||
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit) |
$ | 1.7 | n.m. | $ | (3.0 | ) | ||||||
* | We do not allocate certain corporate income and expenses not directly identifiable with the respective segments, including general and administrative expenses, treasury activities and exploratory and preclinical research and clinical development expenses. Research and development expense is considered a corporate expense unless it relates to an existing marketed product or a product candidate enters Phase III clinical trials at which time related costs would be chargeable to one of our operating segments. | |
n.m. not meaningful |
15
Table of Contents
Products Segment
Segment profitability (millions of dollars):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March | % | March | ||||||||||
2008 | Change | 2007 | ||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 27.4 | 21 | $ | 22.7 | |||||||
Cost of sales |
11.6 | 29 | 9.0 | |||||||||
Research and development |
3.8 | 53 | 2.4 | |||||||||
Selling and marketing |
7.5 | (6 | ) | 8.1 | ||||||||
Amortization |
0.2 | | 0.2 | |||||||||
Restructuring charge |
1.3 | 120 | 0.6 | |||||||||
Segment profit |
$ | 3.0 | 30 | $ | 2.4 | |||||||
Revenues
Performance of individual products is provided below (millions of dollars):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March | % | March | ||||||||||
Product | 2008 | Change | 2007 | |||||||||
Oncaspar |
$ | 12.3 | 65 | $ | 7.5 | |||||||
DepoCyt |
2.0 | (17 | ) | 2.4 | ||||||||
Abelcet |
7.0 | (9 | ) | 7.7 | ||||||||
Adagen |
6.1 | 20 | 5.1 | |||||||||
Totals |
$ | 27.4 | 21 | $ | 22.7 | |||||||
The 21%
growth in net product sales for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the
same period of 2007 was attributable primarily to higher revenues from our oncology product,
Oncaspar, which benefited from a number of favorable effects. There was a $1.2 million
international shipment in the first quarter of 2008 with no corresponding shipment in the first
quarter of 2007. In addition, Oncaspar sales rose due to a
combination of a volume increase of 3% and
price increases necessitated by significantly higher raw material cost and expenses related to the
development of manufacturing process improvements and technology transfer.
See discussions below in cost of sales and research and development
regarding increased production costs and production process enhancements. Continued growth in
sales of Oncaspar is reflective of its adoption in certain protocols by hospitals and cooperative
groups. Sales of DepoCyt, for treatment of lymphomatous meningitis, and Adagen, for treatment of
severe immunodeficiency disease, tend to fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter. The decline in
Abelcet, for treatment of invasive fungal infections, continues a pattern that developed in late
2004 which we believe is attributable to competitive pressures in the marketplace, although the
rate of decline this quarter is lower than the quarterly average over the past year.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales of marketed products for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $11.6 million
or 42% of sales, compared to $9.0 million or 40% of sales for the comparable three-month period of
2007. The two percentage point reduced margin earned in the period ended March 31, 2008 was due
mainly to timing of production.
Gross
margins on Oncaspar remained constant from year to year despite a significant increase
in raw material costs under the supply agreement entered into in
December 2006. The effects of this
raw material cost increase were not reflected in cost of products sold until the latter half of
2007.
16
Table of Contents
Research and development
Research and development spending on marketed products, primarily Oncaspar and Adagen,
increased 53 percent from $2.4 million in the first quarter of 2007 to $3.8 million in the first
quarter of 2008. We continue to increase efforts to improve the manufacturing processes and
pharmaceutical properties of both products. As previously disclosed, we are taking over
responsibility for the production of L-asparaginase by the beginning of 2010. We will invest for
the next few years to enhance and secure the supply of Oncaspar and
Adagen. We announced in February 2008 that our Oncaspar solid tumor
trial in combination therapy of Oncaspar and Gemzar had reached dose-limiting toxicities. At
that time, we were undertaking an analysis of the data to better
understand whether this combination warranted
further development in solid tumors and lymphoma. Subsequently, we
have decided to close the Phase I study. Despite our decision, investigators remain
interested in exploring Oncaspars use in solid tumors through
their own studies.
Selling and marketing expenses
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of sales and marketing personnel, other
commercial expense and marketing programs to support our sales force as well as medical education.
Selling and marketing expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were $7.5 million, a
decrease of 6 percent from $8.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The decrease
reflects the effects of the sales force realignment that took place in late 2007. Also included in
selling and marketing expenses are the costs associated with our medical affairs program, which is
continuing to expand, offsetting to some degree the savings from the sales force realignment.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
Amortization expense was $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, unchanged
from the three months ended March 31, 2007. Amortization of intangible assets has been provided
over their estimated lives ranging from 1-14 years on a straight-line basis.
Restructuring
During the first quarter of 2007, we announced plans to consolidate our manufacturing
operations in our Indianapolis, Indiana location. This action was taken as part of our continued
efforts to streamline operations. All operations at our South Plainfield, New Jersey facility are
expected to be transferred to our Indianapolis facility in 2008, resulting in the incurrence and
full accrual of certain employee severance and facility exit costs. Among these costs will be
employee severance and related benefits for affected employees estimated to be approximately $3.5
million. These amounts are expected to be paid over a period of time commencing upon the
successful transfer of production to our Indianapolis facility and closure of our South Plainfield
facility in 2008. Severance charges and related benefits of $2.2 million had been recognized
through December 31, 2007. An additional $1.0 million of severance costs were recognized during
the first three months of 2008. We expect to incur other costs during 2008 related to the
relocation of goods and equipment, which will be recognized when costs are incurred.
A
reassessment of the estimated time to complete the manufacturing consolidation resulted in
shortening the amortization period for leasehold improvements at South Plainfield causing a
$226,000 first-quarter charge to restructuring expense for the accelerated amortization. In
addition, certain assets consisting primarily of manufacturing equipment that will not be
transferred to the Indianapolis facility, nor continue to be used in manufacturing at the South
Plainfield facility were decommissioned during 2007. Accordingly, we recognized the remaining
depreciation totaling $5.1 million on these assets during 2007.
During 2007, $1.9 million, the cost of required validation batches at our Indianapolis
facility for both Oncaspar and Adagen, was expensed and included in cost of product sales. There
were no such charges for validation batches during the first quarter of 2008.
We will likely experience costs associated with the lease termination or the subleasing of the
South Plainfield facility, if future triggering events occur. Such costs will be incurred and
recognized when we cease use of the property in 2008.
Additionally, during 2007, we recognized $0.4 million of employee severance and related
benefits when we combined our previous two specialized sales forces into one sales team.
17
Table of Contents
Royalties Segment
(millions of dollars)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March | % | March | ||||||||||
2008 | Change | 2007 | ||||||||||
Royalty revenue |
$ | 14.7 | (10 | ) | $ | 16.3 | ||||||
Royalty revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2008 decreased 10 percent to $14.7
million from $16.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The reduction in royalties
from the prior-year first quarter was due primarily to a ten-percent reduction in royalties on
sales of PEG-INTRON. In August 2007, we sold a 25 percent interest in our PEG-INTRON royalties.
Royalties on the remaining portion of our PEG-INTRON interest rose by 15 percent.
On April 23, 2008, the Company announced the approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
of Cimzia for treatment of Crohns disease. Cimzia was developed by UCB using our PEGylation
technology and will be marketed by them. Due to the timing of our royalty revenue recognition,
royalties on sales of Cimzia are expected to be reported by us in the latter half of 2008.
Costs and expenses
Royalty revenues do not require any material specific maintenance costs. At some point in the
future, costs associated with initiation of new outlicensing agreements that could result in our
receipt of a royalty stream and, if necessary, costs necessary to maintain the underlying
technology may be charged to the Royalties segment.
Contract Manufacturing Segment
(millions of dollars)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March | March | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Revenues |
$ | 6.6 | $ | 2.5 | ||||
Cost of sales |
4.5 | 2.5 | ||||||
Segment profit |
$ | 2.1 | $ | | ||||
Revenues
Contract manufacturing revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $6.6 million.
This compares to $2.5 million for the comparable period of 2007. The increase in contract
manufacturing revenue was the combined result of: increased shipments to a newly acquired customer,
timing of shipments to our customers (adversely affecting the first quarter of 2007 and having a
favorable effect on first-quarter 2008 sales) and compensation for certain non-routine services.
It is not anticipated that the level of sales achieved in Contract Manufacturing in the first
quarter of 2008 will continue throughout the year.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales for contract manufacturing for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $4.5
million or 68% of sales compared to $2.5 million or 98% of sales for the comparable three-month
period of 2007. Cost of sales for the first quarter of 2008, as a percentage of sales, was
favorably affected by the above-referenced non-routine services which contributed $0.9 million of
revenues. These services were performed in 2007 but recognition was delayed until all criteria for
revenue recognition were met. Cost of sales for the first quarter of 2007 was adversely affected
by certain start-up costs related to the new customer arrangement referred to above.
18
Table of Contents
Non-U.S Revenue
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we had export sales and royalties on export
sales of $20.2 million, of which $13.3 million were in Europe. This compares to $15.6 million of
export sales in the comparable three-month period of 2007, of which $8.8 million were in Europe.
The timing of international shipments causes quarter-to-quarter variability in non-U.S. revenue.
Corporate and Other Expense
(millions of dollars)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March | % | March | ||||||||||
2008 | Change | 2007 | ||||||||||
Research and development |
$ | 9.4 | (13 | ) | $ | 10.8 | ||||||
General and administrative |
7.8 | (13 | ) | 9.0 | ||||||||
Other (income) expense: |
||||||||||||
Investment income, net |
(2.2 | ) | (15 | ) | (2.6 | ) | ||||||
Interest expense |
3.4 | (26 | ) | 4.6 | ||||||||
Other, net |
(0.3 | ) | 229 | (0.1 | ) | |||||||
0.9 | (52 | ) | 1.9 | |||||||||
Corporate and other expenses |
$ | 18.1 | (16 | ) | $ | 21.7 | ||||||
n.m. not meaningful
Research and development. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, research and development
expenses decreased by $1.4 million to $9.4 million as compared to the three months ended March 31,
2007. As we have previously indicated, we continue to expand our research and development efforts
in areas such as rhMBL, PEG-SN38, the HIF-1 alpha antagonist and
other LNA - and PEGylation-based
programs. We anticipate increased levels of research and development expense in 2008 as compared
to full-year 2007. In addition, as previously disclosed, we anticipate making milestone payments
to third parties for the successful advancement of our research and development pipeline of up to
$10.0 million in 2008.
General and administrative. General and administrative expense decreased to $7.8 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $9.0 million in the year-earlier quarter. This was due
primarily to the first-quarter 2007 vesting of certain stock option awards not recurring in
first-quarter 2008.
Other (income) expense. Other (income) expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was
net expense of $0.9 million, as compared to net expense of $1.9 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. Other (income) expense includes: net investment income, interest expense and other
income or expense.
Net investment income was relatively constant at $2.2 million for the three months ended March
31, 2008 compared to $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Interest expense, which includes amortization of deferred debt issue costs, was $3.4 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007 as a result of the declining balance of 4.5% notes payable.
Other, net was income of $0.3 million and $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Income taxes
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we recorded a net tax provision of $210,000
which represents Canadian tax liabilities. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, a net tax
benefit was recorded of $193,000 consisting of state and Canadian taxes and an adjustment to taxes
payable. No. U.S. income tax provisions were recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2008
or 2007, respectively, as the estimated annual effective tax rate is zero in both years.
19
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Total cash reserves, which include cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, restricted
investments and cash and marketable securities, were $198.8 million as of March 31, 2008, as
compared to $258.2 million as of December 31, 2007. The decline was primarily attributable to the
repurchase of $59.9 million principal amount of our 4.5% notes payable. We invest our excess cash
primarily in United States government-backed securities and investment-grade corporate debt
securities and auction rate securities.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $0.7
million compared to cash used in operating activities of $15.0 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. Cash of $7.2 million was generated during the three months ended March 31, 2008
comprised of net income of $1.5 million, adjusted for noncash items totaling $5.7 million.
Fluctuations in operating assets and liabilities absorbed approximately $6.5 million of this amount
netting to the $0.7 million of net cash from operations in the first quarter of 2008. Contributing
to first quarter of 2007 cash used in operations was an operating loss of $2.8 million coupled with
a significant increase in inventories to preferred levels.
Investing activities yielded a $81.1 million source of cash in the first quarter of 2008
versus a $12.6 million source of cash during the first quarter of 2007. In the first quarter of
2007, we made a $17.5 million payment for a license related to our December 2006 agreement related
to Oncaspar production. Restricted investments held at December 31, 2007 in the amount of $55.0
million were sold or matured during the three months ended March 31, 2008 providing the funds
needed to repurchase outstanding 4.5% notes payable.
Repurchase of $59.9 million principal amount of the 4.5% notes payable during the first
quarter of 2008 for a cash outlay of $59.5 million was the primary financing cash outflow.
As of March 31, 2008, we had outstanding $275.0 million of convertible senior notes payable
that bear interest at an annual rate of 4% and $12.5 million of convertible subordinated notes
payable that bear interest at an annual rate of 4.5%. Interest is payable on June 1 and December 1
for the 4% notes and January 1 and July 1 for the 4.5% notes. Accrued interest on the notes was
$3.8 million and $2.5 million, respectively as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
Under our exclusive license with Sanofi-Aventis for marketing and distribution of Oncaspar in
the U.S. and Canada, we are obligated to pay $5.0 million if net sales exceed $30.0 million for two
consecutive years. Net sales of Oncaspar in the U.S. and Canada totaled $33.7 million in the full
year 2007 and amounted to $11.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 indicating a
reasonable likelihood the obligation may occur in 2008.
Our current sources of liquidity are our cash reserves; interest earned on such cash reserves;
product sales; royalties earned, which are primarily related to sales of PEG-INTRON; and contract
manufacturing revenue. As a result of the sale in the third quarter of 2007, of a 25% interest in
future royalties payable to us on sales of PEG-INTRON occurring after June 30, 2007, cash flows
from royalties earned have been affected accordingly. Based upon our currently planned research
and development activities and related costs and our current sources of liquidity, we anticipate
our current cash reserves and expected cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our
capital and operational requirements for the near future. As indicated above, total cash reserves
include restricted investments and cash. These dedicated funds amounted to $14.5 million at March
31, 2008 (comprised of restricted cash only) and $73.6 million at December 31, 2007. These
segregated assets fully covered the $12.5 million and $72.4 million, respectively, principal amount
of 4.5% notes payable outstanding as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Any residual
restricted cash after the July 1, 2008 retirement of all remaining 4.5% notes will revert to
general corporate funds.
Included in our short-term investments at March 31, 2008 are AAA/AA rated investments in
auction rate securities totaling $7.9 million par value ($7.7 million fair value). Recent
difficulties in the auction rate securities marketplace have raised concerns about the liquidity of
such investments and we have reduced our holdings in them from approximately $51.4 million par
value at December 31, 2007. One auction rate security with a par value of $1.5 million has
experienced failed auctions since late 2007. An assessment of its fair value indicated a potential
impairment of $240,000 as of December 31, 2007 which was deemed to be temporary and recognized in
other comprehensive income. Its fair value as of March 31, 2008 remains below par by $270,000. We
have no need to liquidate this particular security in the near term and based upon information
available to us at this time, we anticipate being able to recover its original cost basis and that
of all auction rate securities remaining in our portfolio.
20
Table of Contents
While we believe that our current sources of liquidity will be adequate to satisfy our capital
and operational needs for the near future, we may enter into agreements with collaborators with
respect to the development and commercialization of products that could increase our cash
requirement or we may seek additional financing to fund future operations and potential
acquisitions. We cannot assure you, however, that we will be able to obtain additional funds on
acceptable terms, if at all.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in transactions that generate
relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities (SPE), which would have been
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually
narrow limited purposes. As of March 31, 2008, we were not involved in any SPE transactions.
Our 4% notes payable are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of
$9.55 per share and pose a reasonable likelihood of potential significant dilution. The maximum
potential dilutive effect of conversion of the 4% notes is 28.8 million shares. Our 4.5% notes
have a conversion price of $70.98 per share. Consequently, dilution related to the 4.5% notes is
remote. Notes payable are discussed in greater detail in Liquidity and Capital Resources above and
in the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In addition, stock options to purchase 8.5 million shares of our common stock at a weighted
average exercise price of $11.32 per share and 2.0 million restricted stock units were outstanding
at March 31, 2008 that represent additional potential dilution.
Contractual Obligations
Our major outstanding contractual obligations relate to our operating leases, convertible
debt, and license agreements with collaborative partners.
During the first quarter of 2008, we repurchased $59.9 million principal amount of our 4.5%
notes payable for $59.5 million. Other than this, since December 31, 2007, there have been no
material changes with respect to our contractual obligations as disclosed under Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Contractual Obligations
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the portrayal of a companys
financial condition and results of operations and requires managements most difficult, subjective
or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters
that are inherently uncertain.
Our consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles
that are generally accepted in the United States. All professional accounting standards effective
as of March 31, 2008 have been taken into consideration in preparing the consolidated financial
statements. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related
disclosures. Some of those estimates are subjective and complex, and, consequently, actual results
could differ from those estimates. The following accounting policies have been highlighted as
significant because changes to certain judgments and assumptions inherent in these policies could
affect our consolidated financial statements.
We base our estimates, to the extent possible, on historical experience. Historical
information is modified as appropriate based on current business factors and various assumptions
that we believe are necessary to form a basis for making judgments about the carrying value of
assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis and make changes when
necessary. Actual results could differ from our estimates.
21
Table of Contents
Revenues
Revenues from product sales and contract manufacturing revenue are recognized when title
passes to the customer (wholesaler or end-user). For product sales we also record a provision at
the time of shipment for estimated future credits, chargebacks, sales discounts, rebates and
returns. These sales provision accruals, except for rebates which are recorded as a liability, are
presented as a reduction of the accounts receivable balances. We continually monitor the adequacy
of the accruals by comparing the actual payments to the estimates used in establishing the
accruals.
We provide chargeback payments to the wholesalers based on their sales to members of buying
groups at prices determined under a contract between ourselves and the member. Administrative fees
are paid to buying groups based on the total amount of purchases by their members. We estimate the
amount of the chargeback that will be paid using (a) distribution channel information obtained from
certain of our wholesalers, which allows us to determine the amount and expiry of inventory in the
distribution channel, and (b) historical trends, adjusted for current changes. The settlement of
the chargebacks generally occurs within three months after the sale to the wholesaler. We
regularly analyze the historical chargeback trends and make adjustments to recorded reserves for
changes in trends.
In addition, state agencies that administer various programs, such as the U.S. Medicaid
programs, receive rebates. Medicaid rebates and administrative fees are recorded as a liability
and a reduction of gross sales when we record the sale of the product. In determining the
appropriate accrual amount, we use (a) channel information obtained from certain of our
wholesalers, which allows us to determine the amount and expiry of inventory in the distribution
channel, (b) our historical Medicaid rebate and administrative fee payments by product as a
percentage of our historical sales, and (c) any significant changes in sales trends. Current
Medicaid rebate laws and interpretations, and the percentage of our products that are sold to
Medicaid patients are also evaluated. Factors that complicate the rebate calculations are the
timing of the average manufacturer pricing computation, the lag time between sale and payment of a
rebate, which can range up to nine months, and the level of reimbursement by state agencies.
The following is a summary of reductions of gross sales accrued as of March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
March 31, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||
Accounts Receivable Reductions |
||||||||
Chargebacks |
$ | 2,205 | $ | 2,578 | ||||
Cash discounts |
143 | 159 | ||||||
Other (including returns) |
2,080 | 2,046 | ||||||
Total |
4,428 | 4,783 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
||||||||
Medicaid rebates |
1,285 | 1,382 | ||||||
Administrative fees |
146 | 187 | ||||||
Total |
1,431 | 1,569 | ||||||
Grand Total |
$ | 5,859 | $ | 6,352 | ||||
There were no revisions to the estimates for gross-to-net sales adjustments that were material
to income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Royalties under our license agreements with third parties are recognized when reasonably
determinable and earned through the sale of the product by the licensee net of future credits,
chargebacks, sales discount rebates and refunds and collection is reasonably assured. Notification
from the third-party licensee of the royalties earned under the license agreement is the basis for
royalty revenue recognition. This information is generally received from the licensees in the
quarter subsequent to the period in which the sales occur.
At the request of the customer, certain contract manufacturing arrangements involve the
transfer of title of the finished product to the customer prior to shipment. The product in
question is manufactured to the unique specifications of the customer and cannot be used to fill
other orders. If all necessary conditions are met, including: the product is complete and ready
for shipment, the risks of ownership have passed to the customer and the customer pays for storage
of the product at our facility, we will recognize revenue.
22
Table of Contents
Non-refundable milestone payments that represent the completion of a separate earnings process
are recognized as revenue when earned, upon the occurrence of contract-specified events and when
the milestone has substance. Non-refundable payments received upon entering into license and other
collaborative agreements where we have continuing involvement are recorded as deferred revenue and
recognized ratably over the estimated service period.
Income Taxes
Under the asset and liability method of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109), deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to
differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax
rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets is provided
for when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. As of March 31, 2008, we believe, that it is more likely than not that our net deferred
tax assets, including our net operating losses from operating activities and stock option
exercises, will not be realized. We recognize the benefit of an uncertain tax position that we
have taken or expect to take on the income tax returns we file if it is more likely than not that
we will be able to sustain our position.
Available-for-Sale Securities
We assess the carrying value of our available-for-sale securities in accordance with FASB
Staff Position (FSP) 115-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to
Certain Investments. An impairment write-down is recorded when a decline in the value of an
investment is determined to be other-than-temporary. These determinations involve a significant
degree of judgment and are subject to change as facts and circumstances change.
Long-Lived Assets Impairment Analysis
Long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets are tested for impairment when
impairment indicators are present. Impairment indicators are events or circumstances that may be
indicative of possible impairment such as a significant adverse change in legal factors or in
business climate, a current period operating loss combined with a history of operating losses or a
projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived
asset or asset group.
Testing for the recoverability of amortizable intangible assets is performed initially by
comparing the carrying amount of the asset group to the future undiscounted net cash flows to be
generated by the assets. If the undiscounted net cash flow stream exceeds the carrying amount, no
further analysis is required. However, if this test shows a negative relationship, the fair value
of the assets within the asset group must be determined and we would record an impairment charge
for any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value. These evaluations involve amounts and
forecasts that are based on managements best estimates and judgment. Actual results may differ
from these estimates.
Share-Based Payment
We account for share-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment. SFAS No. 123R establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an
entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services and requires that the compensation
cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements,
measured by the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued, adjusted for estimated
forfeitures. We have elected the modified prospective transition method for SFAS No. 123R which
requires that compensation costs be recorded, as earned, for all unvested stock options and
restricted stock awards outstanding at June 30, 2005.
The impact that share-based payment awards will have on our results of operations is a
function of the number of shares awarded, vesting and the trading price of our stock at date of
grant, combined with the application of the Black-Scholes valuation model. Fair value of
share-based payments is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model which employs weighted
average assumptions for expected volatility of the Companys stock, expected term until exercise of
the options, the risk free interest rate, and dividends, if any. Expected volatility is based on
historical Enzon stock price information.
23
Table of Contents
Recently Issued Accounting Standards, Not Adopted as of March 31, 2008
In December 2007, the FASB issued two statements that would apply prospectively to potential,
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. Early
application is not permitted. These pronouncements would be adopted at such time as we undertake a
business combination and will have no impact on our current or historical financial statements.
SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, retains the fundamental requirements of purchase accounting
but changes, among other things, the way assets and liabilities are recognized such as requiring
recognition of in-process research and development at fair value. It also calls for the
recognition of most acquisition costs as expense rather than part of the total acquisition cost.
SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, establishes
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling (minority) interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.
In December 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issued EITF 07-1, Accounting for
Collaborative Arrangements. Effective beginning in 2009, the consensus prohibits participants in
a collaborative agreement from applying the equity method of accounting to activities performed
outside a separate legal entity and requires gross or net presentation of revenues and expenses by
the respective parties depending upon their roles in the collaboration. We are in the process of
evaluating the possible impact the consensus may have on our financial statements, but do not
expect it to be material to our financial position or results of operations.
Forward-Looking Information and Factors That May Affect Future Results
There are forward-looking statements contained herein, which can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology such as the words believes, expects, may, will, should,
potential, anticipates, plans or intends and similar expressions. Such forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual
results, events or developments to be materially different from the future results, events or
developments indicated in such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not
limited to:
| The risk that we will not achieve success in our research and development efforts, including clinical trials conducted by us or our collaborative partners. | ||
| The risk that we will experience operating losses for the next several years. | ||
| The risk that there will be a decline in sales of one or more of our marketed products or products sold by others from which we derive royalty revenues. Such sales declines could result from increased competition, loss of patent protection, pricing, supply shortages and/or regulatory constraints. | ||
| The risk that, due to limited or single sources of supply for major products, we will be unable to obtain critical compounds used in the manufacture of our products at economically feasible prices or at all, or one of our key suppliers will experience manufacturing problems or delays. | ||
| Decisions by regulatory authorities regarding whether and when to approve our regulatory applications as well as their decisions regarding labeling and other matters could affect the commercial potential of our products or developmental products. | ||
| The risk that our internal manufacturing will experience failures in production, facility inspections or approvals that result in increased costs, delays in product manufacturing, product recalls or a delay in our ability to complete the consolidation of our manufacturing facilities. | ||
| The risk that we will fail to obtain adequate financing to meet our future capital and financing needs. | ||
| The risk that key personnel will leave the Company. |
A more detailed discussion of these and other factors that could affect results is contained
in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. These factors should be considered carefully and
readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. No assurance
can be given that the future
24
Table of Contents
results
covered by the forward-looking statements will be achieved. All information contained herein is as of
the date of this report and we undertake no duty to update this information.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our
holdings of financial instruments are comprised of auction rate
securities and debt
securities. All such instruments are classified as securities
available-for-sale. Apart from custodial accounts related to the Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan, we do not invest in portfolio equity securities. We do not invest in commodities or use
financial derivatives for trading purposes. Our debt security portfolio represents funds held
temporarily pending use in our business and operations. We manage these funds accordingly. We
seek reasonable assuredness of the safety of principal and market liquidity by investing in rated
fixed income securities while at the same time seeking to achieve a favorable rate of return. Our
market risk exposure consists principally of exposure to changes in interest rates. Our holdings
are also exposed to the risks of changes in the credit quality of issuers. We typically invest
the majority of our investments in the shorter-end of the maturity spectrum.
The table below presents the principal amounts and related weighted-average interest rates of
our marketable debt securities, excluding those related to our Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan, by year of maturity (twelve-month intervals ending March 31 of the year indicated) as of
March 31, 2008 (in thousands):
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Total | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||
Fixed Rate |
$ | 58,221 | $ | 45,118 | $ | 8,331 | $ | 111,670 | $ | 111,719 | ||||||||||
Average Interest Rate |
4.68 | % | 5.46 | % | 6.29 | % | 5.11 | % | ||||||||||||
Variable Rate |
7,950 | | | 7,950 | 7,680 | |||||||||||||||
Average Interest Rate |
3.96 | % | | | 3.96 | % | ||||||||||||||
$ | 66,171 | $ | 45,118 | $ | 8,331 | $ | 119,620 | $ | 119,399 | |||||||||||
Our convertible notes payable outstanding have fixed interest rates. Accordingly, the fair
values of the respective issues will fluctuate as market rates of interest rise or fall. Fair
values are also affected by changes in the price of our common stock. Fair values are determined
based upon quoted prices of our respective notes. Our 4% convertible senior unsecured notes in the
principal amount of $275.0 million at March 31, 2008 are due June 1, 2013 and have a fair value of
$307.2 million at March 31, 2008. Our 4.5% convertible subordinated notes in the principal amount
of $12.5 million are due July 1, 2008 and have a fair value of $12.5 million at March 31, 2008.
25
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange
Act)) as of March 31, 2008. Based on the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
March 31, 2008.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting, as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during the period covered by this
report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal
control over financial reporting.
26
Table of Contents
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
Exhibit | Reference | |||||||
Number | Description | No. | ||||||
3(i) | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
|
(1 | ) | |||||
3(ii) | Amended and Restated By-laws
|
(2 | ) | |||||
3(iii) | Amendment dated July 31, 2007 to Amended and Restated Bylaws
|
(3 | ) | |||||
3(iv) | Amendment dated November 21, 2007 to Amended and Restated
Bylaws
|
(4 | ) | |||||
4.1 | Rights Agreement dated May 17, 2002 between the Company and
Continental Stock Transfer Trust Company, as rights agent
|
(5 | ) | |||||
4.2 | First Amendment to the Rights Agreement, dated as of
February 19, 2003 between the Company and Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, as rights agent
|
(6 | ) | |||||
4.3 | Second Amendment to the Rights Agreement, dated as of
January 7, 2008 between the Company and Continental Stock
Transfer and Trust Company, as rights agent.
|
(7 | ) | |||||
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
* | ||||||
31.2 | Certification of Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
* | ||||||
32.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
* | ||||||
32.2 | Certification of Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
* |
* | Filed herewith. | |
Referenced exhibit was previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to the Companys filing indicated below and is incorporated herein by reference to that filing: |
(1) | Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 19, 2006. | |
(2) | Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed August 3, 2006. | |
(3) | Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 filed August 2, 2007. | |
(4) | Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 26, 2007. | |
(5) | Form 8-A12G (File No. 000-12957) filed with the Commission on May 22, 2002. | |
(6) | Form 8-A12G/A (File No. 000-12957) filed with the Commission on February 20, 2003. | |
(7) | Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 8, 2008. |
27
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (Registrant) |
||||
/s/ Jeffrey H. Buchalter | ||||
Jeffrey H. Buchalter | ||||
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
Date: May 9, 2008 | /s/ Craig A. Tooman | |||
Craig A. Tooman | ||||
Executive Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
28