Equity Commonwealth - Quarter Report: 2015 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 1-9317
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland | 04-6558834 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
Two North Riverside Plaza, Suite 600, Chicago, IL | 60606 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(312) 646-2800 |
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer o | |
Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
Number of registrant’s common shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of October 31, 2015: 126,349,914.
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2015
INDEX
Page | ||
EXPLANATORY NOTE
References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Company, EQC, we, us or our, refer to Equity Commonwealth and its consolidated subsidiaries as of September 30, 2015, unless the context indicates otherwise.
i
PART I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements.
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(amounts in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
September 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | ||||||
(audited) | |||||||
ASSETS | |||||||
Real estate properties: | |||||||
Land | $ | 413,281 | $ | 714,238 | |||
Buildings and improvements | 3,559,060 | 5,014,205 | |||||
3,972,341 | 5,728,443 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (884,183 | ) | (1,030,445 | ) | |||
3,088,158 | 4,697,998 | ||||||
Properties held for sale | 112,150 | — | |||||
Acquired real estate leases, net | 99,017 | 198,287 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 1,649,162 | 364,516 | |||||
Restricted cash | 28,463 | 32,257 | |||||
Rents receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $9,281 and $6,565, respectively | 184,679 | 248,101 | |||||
Other assets, net | 162,614 | 220,480 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 5,324,243 | $ | 5,761,639 | |||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||
Senior unsecured debt, net | $ | 1,460,360 | $ | 1,598,416 | |||
Mortgage notes payable, net | 367,713 | 609,249 | |||||
Liabilities related to properties held for sale | 1,909 | — | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 121,697 | 162,204 | |||||
Assumed real estate lease obligations, net | 4,890 | 26,784 | |||||
Rent collected in advance | 29,744 | 31,359 | |||||
Security deposits | 10,722 | 14,044 | |||||
Total liabilities | 1,997,035 | 2,442,056 | |||||
Shareholders’ equity: | |||||||
Preferred shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized; | |||||||
Series D preferred shares; 6 1/2% cumulative convertible; 4,915,196 and 4,915,497 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, aggregate liquidation preference of $122,880 and $122,887, respectively | 119,263 | 119,266 | |||||
Series E preferred shares; 7 1/4% cumulative redeemable on or after May 15, 2016; 11,000,000 shares issued and outstanding, aggregate liquidation preference $275,000 | 265,391 | 265,391 | |||||
Common shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value: 350,000,000 shares authorized; 126,349,914 and 129,607,279 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | 1,263 | 1,296 | |||||
Additional paid in capital | 4,410,951 | 4,487,133 | |||||
Cumulative net income | 2,290,564 | 2,233,852 | |||||
Cumulative other comprehensive loss | (5,142 | ) | (53,216 | ) | |||
Cumulative common distributions | (3,111,868 | ) | (3,111,868 | ) | |||
Cumulative preferred distributions | (643,214 | ) | (622,271 | ) | |||
Total shareholders’ equity | 3,327,208 | 3,319,583 | |||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 5,324,243 | $ | 5,761,639 |
See accompanying notes.
1
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 125,459 | $ | 174,216 | $ | 457,128 | $ | 518,663 | |||||||
Tenant reimbursements and other income | 33,749 | 42,379 | 118,829 | 130,386 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | 159,208 | 216,595 | 575,957 | 649,049 | |||||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 73,571 | 99,392 | 261,128 | 293,824 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 40,522 | 57,213 | 156,858 | 168,693 | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 16,249 | 47,450 | 43,718 | 96,395 | |||||||||||
Loss on asset impairment | — | — | 17,162 | 17,922 | |||||||||||
Acquisition related costs | — | — | — | 5 | |||||||||||
Total expenses | 130,342 | 204,055 | 478,866 | 576,839 | |||||||||||
Operating income | 28,866 | 12,540 | 97,091 | 72,210 | |||||||||||
Interest and other income | 637 | 406 | 4,813 | 1,071 | |||||||||||
Interest expense (including net amortization of debt discounts, premiums and deferred financing fees of $171, $(91), $23 and $(700), respectively) | (25,111 | ) | (35,245 | ) | (82,926 | ) | (111,079 | ) | |||||||
(Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt | (3,887 | ) | 6,699 | 6,111 | 6,699 | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of equity investment | — | 171,754 | — | 171,721 | |||||||||||
Gain on issuance of shares by an equity investee | — | — | — | 17,020 | |||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange loss | (9,809 | ) | — | (8,953 | ) | — | |||||||||
Gain on sale of properties | 39,793 | — | 42,953 | — | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of investees | 30,489 | 156,154 | 59,089 | 157,642 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | (23 | ) | (703 | ) | (2,377 | ) | (2,166 | ) | |||||||
Equity in earnings of investees | — | 1,072 | — | 24,460 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 30,466 | 156,523 | 56,712 | 179,936 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations: | |||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations | — | 95 | — | 8,220 | |||||||||||
Gain (loss) on asset impairment from discontinued operations | — | 122 | — | (2,238 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt from discontinued operations | — | — | — | (3,345 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income | 30,466 | 156,740 | 56,712 | 182,573 | |||||||||||
Preferred distributions | (6,981 | ) | (6,981 | ) | (20,943 | ) | (25,114 | ) | |||||||
Excess fair value of consideration over carrying value of preferred shares | — | — | — | (16,205 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders | $ | 23,485 | $ | 149,759 | $ | 35,769 | $ | 141,254 | |||||||
Amounts attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders: | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 23,485 | $ | 149,542 | $ | 35,769 | $ | 138,617 | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations | — | 95 | — | 8,220 | |||||||||||
Gain (loss) on asset impairment from discontinued operations | — | 122 | — | (2,238 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt from discontinued operations | — | — | — | (3,345 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 23,485 | $ | 149,759 | $ | 35,769 | $ | 141,254 | |||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic | 128,739 | 128,880 | 129,386 | 123,736 | |||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted | 129,878 | 131,243 | 130,093 | 123,736 | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders: | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.18 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 1.12 | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.02 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 0.18 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 1.14 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders: | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.18 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 1.12 | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.02 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 0.18 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 1.14 | |||||||
Distributions declared per common share | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.25 |
2
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 30,466 | $ | 156,740 | $ | 56,712 | $ | 182,573 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments and other assets | 821 | 1,805 | (843 | ) | 3,432 | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | — | (20,392 | ) | 48,917 | (4,844 | ) | |||||||||
Equity in unrealized income (loss) of an investee | — | 27 | — | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | $ | 31,287 | $ | 138,180 | $ | 104,786 | $ | 181,139 |
See accompanying notes.
3
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
2015 | 2014 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Net income | $ | 56,712 | $ | 182,573 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Depreciation | 117,239 | 122,571 | |||||
Net amortization of debt discounts, premiums and deferred financing fees | 23 | (703 | ) | ||||
Straight line rental income | (3,512 | ) | (10,398 | ) | |||
Amortization of acquired real estate leases | 28,386 | 39,431 | |||||
Other amortization | 17,224 | 15,181 | |||||
Share-based compensation | 11,765 | 3,142 | |||||
Loss on asset impairment | 17,162 | 20,160 | |||||
Gain on early extinguishment of debt | (6,111 | ) | (3,354 | ) | |||
Equity in earnings of investees | — | (24,460 | ) | ||||
Loss on sale of equity investments | — | (171,721 | ) | ||||
Gain on issuance of shares by an equity investee | — | (17,020 | ) | ||||
Distributions of earnings from investees | — | 20,680 | |||||
Foreign currency exchange loss | 8,953 | — | |||||
Net gain on sale of properties | (42,953 | ) | — | ||||
Other non-cash expenses | — | 2,402 | |||||
Change in assets and liabilities: | |||||||
Restricted cash | (6,275 | ) | 5,634 | ||||
Rents receivable and other assets | (46,607 | ) | (28,586 | ) | |||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (5,769 | ) | 19,826 | ||||
Rent collected in advance | (6,112 | ) | (5,399 | ) | |||
Security deposits | 1,298 | 37 | |||||
Due to related persons | — | (9,277 | ) | ||||
Cash provided by operating activities | 141,423 | 160,719 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Real estate improvements | (43,396 | ) | (81,935 | ) | |||
Principal payments received from direct financing lease | 5,717 | 5,451 | |||||
Proceeds from sale of properties, net | 1,425,590 | 185,299 | |||||
Proceeds from sale of securities | 27,068 | — | |||||
Proceeds from sale of equity investments, net | — | 710,492 | |||||
Increase in restricted cash | (3,238 | ) | (4,796 | ) | |||
Cash provided by investing activities | 1,411,741 | 814,511 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Purchase and retirement of common shares | (87,983 | ) | — | ||||
Payments on borrowings | (142,868 | ) | (551,174 | ) | |||
Deferred financing fees | (7,143 | ) | — | ||||
Distributions to common shareholders | — | (29,597 | ) | ||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders | (20,943 | ) | (25,114 | ) | |||
Cash used in financing activities | (258,937 | ) | (605,885 | ) | |||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | (9,581 | ) | (98 | ) | |||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents | 1,284,646 | 369,247 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 364,516 | 217,032 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 1,649,162 | $ | 586,279 |
4
See accompanying notes.
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
2015 | 2014 | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | |||||||
Interest paid | $ | 93,598 | $ | 118,948 | |||
Taxes paid | 5,853 | 2,732 | |||||
NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
(Decrease) increase in capital expenditures recorded as liabilities | $ | (9,753 | ) | $ | 15,757 |
See accompanying notes.
5
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of EQC have been prepared without audit. Certain information and footnote disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, for complete financial statements have been condensed or omitted. We believe the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. However, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K (Annual Report) for the year ended December 31, 2014. Capitalized terms used, but not defined in this Quarterly Report, have the same meanings as in our Annual Report.
In the opinion of our management, all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included. All intercompany transactions and balances with or among our subsidiaries have been eliminated. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. Reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ financial statements to conform to the current year’s presentation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates in the condensed consolidated financial statements include the allowance for doubtful accounts, purchase price allocations, useful lives of fixed assets and impairment of real estate and intangible assets.
Share amounts are presented in whole numbers, except where noted.
Note 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, or ASU 2014-08. ASU 2014-08 changes the criteria for reporting a discontinued operation. Under the new pronouncement, a disposal of a part of an organization that has a major effect on its operations and financial results is a discontinued operation. We adopted ASU 2014-08 on January 1, 2015, and determined that our 2015 dispositions and properties held for sale as of September 30, 2015 do not individually represent a strategic shift, as defined by the standard, that has or will have a major effect on our operations and financial results. As a result, the 2015 dispositions have not been presented as discontinued operations in the 2015 statements of operations.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides guidance for revenue recognition. This update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of this ASU will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. This standard amends existing guidance to require the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of as a deferred charge. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, but early adoption is permitted. We do not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Note 3. Board of Trustees
On March 18, 2014, Related Fund Management, LLC (Related) and Corvex Management LP (Corvex) together, (Related/Corvex), delivered written consents which they represented were from a sufficient number of holders of our outstanding common shares to remove all of our then Trustees (former Trustees) and any other person or persons elected or appointed to our Board of Trustees prior to the effective time of the Related/Corvex removal proposal. After inspection, our then Board of Trustees determined that holders of more than two-thirds of our outstanding common shares as of the February 18, 2014 record date consented to the Related/Corvex proposal, reaching the threshold required to remove all of our
6
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
then Trustees and any other person or persons appointed as a Trustee prior to the effective time of the Related/Corvex removal proposal. Accordingly, on March 25, 2014, all of our former Trustees certified their removal as Trustees of EQC.
On May 23, 2014, at a special meeting of our shareholders (Special Meeting), the following seven individuals were elected to serve on our Board of Trustees: Sam Zell, who serves as the Chairman of the new Board of Trustees, James S. Corl, Edward A. Glickman, David A. Helfand, Peter Linneman, James L. Lozier, Jr. and Kenneth Shea. Each of the foregoing individuals was nominated to serve on the new Board of Trustees by Related/Corvex. On July 31, 2014, our shareholders re-elected the seven individuals listed above and elected Martin L. Edelman, Mary Jane Robertson, Gerald A. Spector and James A. Star to serve on our Board of Trustees, bringing our total number of Trustees to eleven (new Board of Trustees). At the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders held on June 16, 2015, our shareholders re-elected each of our eleven Trustees to serve on our Board of Trustees for the 2015-2016 term.
Note 4. Real Estate Properties
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, we made improvements, excluding tenant-funded improvements, to our properties totaling $46.7 million and $65.9 million, respectively.
Properties Held For Sale:
We classify all properties that meet the criteria outlined in the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as held for sale on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2014, we had no properties classified as held for sale. As of September 30, 2015, we classified the following properties as held for sale (dollars in thousands):
Asset | Date Sold | Segment | Number of Properties | Number of Buildings | Square Footage | Gross Sales Price | |||||||||||
Properties | |||||||||||||||||
One South Church Avenue | October 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 240,811 | $ | 32,000 | ||||||||||
775 Ridge Lake Boulevard | October 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 120,678 | 16,300 | |||||||||||
One Park Square | October 2015 | CBD | 1 | 6 | 259,737 | 34,300 | |||||||||||
Portfolio of Properties | |||||||||||||||||
9040 Roswell Road | October 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 178,941 | ||||||||||||
The Exchange | October 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 2 | 187,632 | ||||||||||||
3920 Arkwright Road | October 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 196,156 | ||||||||||||
1775 West Oak Commons Court | October 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 79,854 | ||||||||||||
Georgia portfolio | 4 | 5 | 642,583 | $ | 48,550 | ||||||||||||
7 | 13 | 1,263,809 | $ | 131,150 |
Summarized balance sheet information for all properties classified as held for sale is as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2015 | |||
Real estate properties | $ | 108,023 | |
Other assets, net | 4,127 | ||
Properties held for sale | $ | 112,150 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 1,479 | |
Security deposits | 430 | ||
Liabilities related to properties held for sale | $ | 1,909 |
7
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Property Dispositions:
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we disposed of the following properties (dollars in thousands):
Asset | Date Disposed | Segment | Number of Properties | Number of Buildings | Square Footage | Gross Sales Price | Gain (Loss) on Sale | ||||||||||||||
Properties | |||||||||||||||||||||
11350 North Meridian Street | January 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 72,264 | $ | 4,200 | $ | 766 | ||||||||||||
333 Laurel Oak Drive(1) | March 2015 | Suburban | — | 1 | 27,164 | 2,450 | 251 | ||||||||||||||
1921 E. Alton Avenue | March 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 67,846 | 14,533 | 4,850 | ||||||||||||||
46 Inverness Center Parkway | April 2015 | Suburban | — | — | — | 2,000 | 1,857 | ||||||||||||||
225 Water Street(2) | May 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 318,997 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Sorrento Valley Business Park | June 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 4 | 105,003 | 23,500 | 11,896 | ||||||||||||||
Illinois Center | August 2015 | CBD | 1 | 2 | 2,090,162 | 376,000 | 26,929 | ||||||||||||||
16th and Race Street | August 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 608,625 | 43,000 | 7,922 | ||||||||||||||
185 Asylum Street | September 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 868,395 | 113,250 | 17,619 | ||||||||||||||
Portfolio of properties | |||||||||||||||||||||
7450 Campus Drive | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 77,411 | ||||||||||||||||
129 Worthington Ridge Road | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 227,500 | ||||||||||||||||
599 Research Parkway | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 48,249 | ||||||||||||||||
181 Marsh Hill Road | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 162,036 | ||||||||||||||||
101 Barnes Road | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 45,755 | ||||||||||||||||
15 Sterling Drive | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 173,015 | ||||||||||||||||
35 Thorpe Avenue | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 79,862 | ||||||||||||||||
50 Barnes Industrial Road North | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 154,255 | ||||||||||||||||
5-9 Barnes Industrial Road | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 38,006 | ||||||||||||||||
860 North Main Street | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 31,165 | ||||||||||||||||
One Barnes Industrial Road South | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 30,170 | ||||||||||||||||
Village Lane | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 2 | 58,185 | ||||||||||||||||
100 Northfield Drive | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 116,986 | ||||||||||||||||
905 Meridian Lake Drive | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 74,652 | ||||||||||||||||
1717 Deerfield Road | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 141,186 | ||||||||||||||||
1955 West Field Court | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 59,130 | ||||||||||||||||
5015 S. Water Circle | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 113,524 | ||||||||||||||||
Adams Place | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 2 | 230,259 | ||||||||||||||||
Cabot Business Park | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 2 | 252,755 | ||||||||||||||||
2300 Crown Colony Drive | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 45,974 | ||||||||||||||||
Myles Standish Industrial Park | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 2 | 74,800 | ||||||||||||||||
340 Thompson Road | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 25,000 | ||||||||||||||||
100 South Charles Street | May 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 159,616 | ||||||||||||||||
6710 Oxon Hill | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 118,336 | ||||||||||||||||
8800 Queen Avenue South | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 280,822 | ||||||||||||||||
9800 Sherlard Parkway | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 46,765 | ||||||||||||||||
Rosedale Corporate Plaza | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 3 | 149,116 | ||||||||||||||||
1000 Shelard Parkway | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 62,499 | ||||||||||||||||
525 Park Street | May 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 75,636 |
8
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Asset | Date Disposed | Segment | Number of Properties | Number of Buildings | Square Footage | Gross Sales Price | Gain (Loss) on Sale | ||||||||||||||
1900 Meyer Drury Drive | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 65,225 | ||||||||||||||||
131-165 West Ninth Street | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 75,517 | ||||||||||||||||
7-9 Vreeland Road | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 155,891 | ||||||||||||||||
5 Paragon Drive | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 119,089 | ||||||||||||||||
1000 Vorhees Drive and 400 Laurel Oak Drive(1) | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 2 | 125,415 | ||||||||||||||||
1601 Veterans Highway | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 63,608 | ||||||||||||||||
Two Corporate Center Drive | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 291,230 | ||||||||||||||||
11311 Cornell Park Drive | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 93,413 | ||||||||||||||||
5300 Kings Island Drive | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 159,421 | ||||||||||||||||
3 Crown Point Court | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 73,987 | ||||||||||||||||
515 Pennsylvania Avenue | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 82,000 | ||||||||||||||||
443 Gulph Road | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 21,000 | ||||||||||||||||
4350 Northern Pike | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 503,885 | ||||||||||||||||
Thunderbolt Place | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 2 | 100,505 | ||||||||||||||||
6160 Kempsville Circle | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 129,565 | ||||||||||||||||
448 Viking Drive | May 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 75,374 | ||||||||||||||||
Portfolio of small office and industrial assets | 45 | 53 | 5,287,790 | $ | 376,000 | $ | (8,075 | ) | |||||||||||||
2501 20th Place South | June 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 125,722 | ||||||||||||||||
420 20th Street North | June 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 514,893 | ||||||||||||||||
Inverness Center | June 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 4 | 475,882 | ||||||||||||||||
701 Poydras Street | June 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 1,256,971 | ||||||||||||||||
300 North Greene Street | June 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 324,305 | ||||||||||||||||
1320 Main Street | June 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 334,075 | ||||||||||||||||
AL, LA, NC, SC office portfolio | 6 | 9 | 3,031,848 | $ | 417,450 | $ | 41,596 | ||||||||||||||
12655 Olive Boulevard | June 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 98,588 | ||||||||||||||||
1285 Fern Ridge Parkway | June 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 66,510 | ||||||||||||||||
St. Louis portfolio | 2 | 2 | 165,098 | $ | 14,300 | $ | (2,349 | ) | |||||||||||||
310-314 Invermay Road(3) | April 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 47,480 | ||||||||||||||||
253-293 George Town Road(3) | April 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 143,914 | ||||||||||||||||
7 Modal Crescent | June 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 164,160 | ||||||||||||||||
71-93 Whiteside Road | June 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 303,488 | ||||||||||||||||
9-13 Titanium Court | June 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 69,664 | ||||||||||||||||
16 Rodborough Road | June 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 90,525 | ||||||||||||||||
22 Rodborough Road | June 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 43,427 | ||||||||||||||||
127-161 Cherry Lane | June 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 278,570 | ||||||||||||||||
310-320 Pitt Street | June 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 313,865 | ||||||||||||||||
44-46 Mandarin Street | June 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 226,718 | ||||||||||||||||
19 Leadership Way | June 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 76,714 | ||||||||||||||||
Australia portfolio(4) | 11 | 11 | 1,758,525 | $ | 232,955 | $ | (47,851 | ) | |||||||||||||
9
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Asset | Date Disposed | Segment | Number of Properties | Number of Buildings | Square Footage | Gross Sales Price | Gain (Loss) on Sale | ||||||||||||||
Widewaters Parkway | August 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 8 | 514,241 | ||||||||||||||||
5062 Brittonfield Parkway | August 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 40,162 | ||||||||||||||||
Woodcliff Drive | August 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 6 | 516,760 | ||||||||||||||||
Interstate Place | August 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 2 | 61,399 | ||||||||||||||||
1000 Pittsford - Victor Road | August 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 73,358 | ||||||||||||||||
1200 Pittsford - Victor Road | August 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 18,900 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate Crossing | August 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 5 | 216,126 | ||||||||||||||||
Canal View Boulevard | August 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 3 | 118,375 | ||||||||||||||||
14 Classic Street | August 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 37,084 | ||||||||||||||||
110 W Fayette Street | August 2015 | CBD | 1 | 1 | 304,906 | ||||||||||||||||
251 Salina Meadows Parkway | August 2015 | Suburban | 1 | 1 | 65,617 | ||||||||||||||||
Upstate New York portfolio | 11 | 30 | 1,966,928 | $ | 104,625 | $ | (12,458 | ) | |||||||||||||
82 | 117 | 16,368,645 | $ | 1,724,263 | $ | 42,953 |
(1) | This property contains three buildings. We sold one building in March 2015 and two buildings in May 2015. |
(2) | Title to this property was transferred to the lender pursuant to a consensual foreclosure in full satisfaction of the mortgage debt with a principal balance of $40.1 million, resulting in a gain on early extinguishment of debt of $17.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. See Note 8 for additional information. |
(3) | These properties were sold in a separate transaction to a different buyer than other Australian properties. |
(4) | The loss on sale includes a $63.2 million cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment reclassified from cumulative other comprehensive loss due to the disposition of the Australian portfolio. |
On June 27, 2014, we sold one CBD property (two buildings) and 13 suburban properties (41 buildings) with a combined 2,784,098 square feet for an aggregate sales price of $215.9 million, excluding mortgage debt repayments and closing costs. In conjunction with this transaction, we recognized a loss on asset impairment of $2.4 million and a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $3.3 million.
Results of operations for properties sold prior to December 31, 2014, are included in discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. Summarized income statement information for properties included in discontinued operations is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||
September 30, 2014 | |||||||
Rental income | $ | (16 | ) | $ | 14,220 | ||
Tenant reimbursements and other income | 407 | 1,730 | |||||
Total revenues | 391 | 15,950 | |||||
Operating expenses | 261 | 7,115 | |||||
General and administrative | 6 | 9 | |||||
Total expenses | 267 | 7,124 | |||||
Operating income | 124 | 8,826 | |||||
Interest and other income | 2 | 2 | |||||
Interest expense | (31 | ) | (608 | ) | |||
Income from discontinued operations | $ | 95 | $ | 8,220 |
10
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 5. Investment in Direct Financing Lease
We have an investment in a direct financing lease that relates to a lease with a term that exceeds 75% of the useful life of an office tower located within a mixed use property in Phoenix, AZ. We recognize income using the effective interest method to produce a level yield on funds not yet recovered. The carrying amount of our net investment of $6.7 million and $12.5 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, is included in other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
We monitor the payment history and credit profile of the tenant and have determined that no allowance for losses related to our direct financing lease was necessary at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Our direct financing lease has an expiration date in 2045.
Note 6. Equity Investments
Investment in SIR
SIR is a REIT that is primarily focused on owning and investing in net leased, single tenant properties. SIR was an unconsolidated equity method investment from July 2, 2013 until July 9, 2014. On July 9, 2014, we sold our entire stake of 22,000,000 common shares of SIR. As a result of this sale, we no longer hold any interest in SIR.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded equity in earnings of $1.1 million and $24.5 million, respectively, related to our investment in SIR on our condensed consolidated statement of operations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we received cash distributions from SIR totaling $20.7 million.
The following unaudited summarized income statement information of SIR for the period from July 1, 2014 through July 9, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through July 9, 2014 is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
For the Period from July 1, 2014 through July 9, 2014 | For the Period from January 1, 2014 through July 9, 2014 | ||||||
Rental income | $ | 4,698 | 98,226 | ||||
Tenant reimbursements and other income | 923 | 16,980 | |||||
Total revenues | 5,621 | 115,206 | |||||
Operating expenses | 1,018 | 20,982 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,043 | 20,832 | |||||
Acquisition related costs | — | 374 | |||||
General and administrative | 357 | 7,731 | |||||
Total expenses | 2,418 | 49,919 | |||||
Operating income | 3,203 | 65,287 | |||||
Interest expense | (295 | ) | (7,287 | ) | |||
Gain on early extinguishment of debt | — | 243 | |||||
Income before income tax expense and equity in earnings of an investee | 2,908 | 58,243 | |||||
Income tax expense | — | (90 | ) | ||||
Equity in earnings of an investee | 11 | 32 | |||||
Net income | $ | 2,919 | $ | 58,185 | |||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 59,889 | 52,394 | |||||
Net income per common share | $ | 0.05 | $ | 1.11 |
11
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Investment in AIC
As of May 9, 2014, we had a net investment of $5.8 million in AIC, an insurance company that was owned in equal proportion by us, our former manager Reit Management & Research LLC (RMR), SIR and five other companies to which RMR provides management services.
On May 9, 2014, as a result of the removal of the former Trustees and in accordance with the terms of the shareholder agreement between us and the other AIC shareholders, the other AIC shareholders exercised their right to purchase all of the 20,000 shares of AIC we then owned. We received $5.8 million in aggregate proceeds from this sale. We no longer own any interest in AIC. For the period from January 1, 2014 through May 9, 2014, we recorded equity in loss of $0.1 million related to our investment in AIC on our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Our participation in the AIC property insurance program expired in June 2014. See Note 17 for additional information about our investment in AIC.
Note 7. Real Estate Mortgages Receivable
As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had total real estate mortgages receivable with an aggregate carrying value of $8.1 million included in other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We provided mortgage financing totaling $7.7 million at 6.0% per annum in connection with our sale of three suburban office and industrial properties (18 buildings) in January 2013 in Dearborn, MI; this real estate mortgage requires monthly interest payments and matures on January 24, 2023. We also provided mortgage financing totaling $0.4 million at 6.0% per annum in connection with our sale of a suburban office property in Salina, NY in April 2012. This real estate mortgage requires monthly interest payments and matures on April 30, 2019.
We monitor the payment history of the borrowers and have determined that no allowance for losses related to these real estate mortgages receivable were necessary at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014.
Note 8. Indebtedness
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan:
Prior to January 29, 2015, we had a $750.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The unsecured revolving credit facility was set to mature on October 19, 2015, and had an interest rate of LIBOR plus a spread, which was 150 basis points as of December 31, 2014. We paid a facility fee of 35 basis points per annum on the total amount of lending commitments under our revolving credit facility. Prior to January 29, 2015, we also had a $400.0 million unsecured term loan that was set to mature on December 15, 2016. Our term loan had an interest rate of LIBOR plus a spread, which was 185 basis points as of December 31, 2014.
On January 29, 2015, we entered into a new credit agreement, pursuant to which the lenders agreed to provide (i) a $750.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, (ii) a $200.0 million 5-year term loan facility and (iii) a $200.0 million 7-year term loan facility. The new agreement replaced our prior credit agreement, dated as of August 9, 2010, and our prior term loan agreement, dated as of December 16, 2010. In connection with the new agreement, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.4 million from the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The revolving credit facility has a scheduled maturity date of January 28, 2019, which maturity date may be extended for up to two additional periods of six months at our option subject to satisfaction of certain conditions and the payment of an extension fee of 0.075% of the aggregate amount available under the revolving credit facility. The 5-year term loan and the 7-year term loan have scheduled maturity dates of January 28, 2020 and January 28, 2022, respectively. We used the proceeds of borrowings under the credit agreement to repay all amounts outstanding and due under the previous term loan agreement.
The credit agreement permits us to utilize up to $100.0 million of the revolving credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit. Amounts outstanding under the credit agreement generally may be prepaid at any time without premium or penalty, subject to certain exceptions. We have the right to request increases in the aggregate maximum amount of borrowings available under the revolving credit facility and term loans up to an additional $1.15 billion, subject to certain conditions.
12
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Borrowings under the 5-year term loan and 7-year term loan will, subject to certain exceptions, bear interest at a LIBOR rate plus a margin of 90 to 180 basis points for the 5-year term loan and 140 to 235 basis points for the 7-year term loan, in each case depending on our credit rating. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility will, subject to certain exceptions, bear interest at a rate equal to, at our option, either a LIBOR rate or a base rate plus a margin of 87.5 to 155 basis points for LIBOR rate advances and 0 to 55 basis points for base rate advances, in each case depending on our credit rating. In addition, we are required to pay a facility fee of 12.5 to 30 basis points, depending on our credit rating, on the borrowings available under the revolving credit facility, whether or not utilized.
Borrowings under our revolving credit facility currently bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread, which was 125 basis points as of September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the interest rate payable on borrowings under our revolving credit facility was 1.44%. As of September 30, 2015, we had no balance outstanding and $750.0 million available under our revolving credit facility. Our term loans currently bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread, which was 140 and 180 basis points for the 5-year and 7-year term loan, respectively, as of September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the interest rates for the amounts outstanding under our 5-year term loan and 7-year term loan were 1.59% and 1.99%, respectively. As of September 30, 2015, we had $200.0 million outstanding under each of our 5-year and 7-year term loans.
Debt Covenants:
Our public debt indenture and related supplements, our revolving credit facility agreement and our term loan agreement contain a number of financial and other covenants, including covenants that restrict our ability to incur indebtedness or to make distributions under certain circumstances and require us to maintain financial ratios and a minimum net worth. At September 30, 2015, we believe we were in compliance with all of our respective covenants under our public debt indenture and related supplements, our revolving credit facility and our term loan agreements.
Senior Unsecured Notes:
On May 1, 2015, we redeemed at par $138.8 million of our 5.75% senior unsecured notes due 2015 and recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.1 million from the write-off of an unamortized discount and unamortized deferred financing fees.
Mortgage Notes Payable:
At September 30, 2015, six of our properties (10 buildings) with an aggregate net book value of $452.4 million had secured mortgage notes totaling $367.7 million (including net premiums and discounts) maturing from 2016 through 2026.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we made the decision to cease making loan servicing payments on 225 Water Street in Jacksonville, Florida. The first payment we determined not to make for this property was due on June 11, 2014. The property was secured by a non-recourse mortgage loan. On October 10, 2014, we were notified by the lender that our decision to cease making loan servicing payments created an event of default effective July 11, 2014, and the lender exercised its option to accelerate the maturity of the unpaid balance of the loan. Beginning July 11, 2014, we accrued interest on this loan at 10.03%, to include the 4.0% of default interest. The lender filed a suit of foreclosure for this property and we cooperated with the lender to allow for a consensual foreclosure process. On May 22, 2015, title to 225 Water Street was transferred to the lender pursuant to the consensual foreclosure in full satisfaction of the mortgage debt, with a principal balance of $40.1 million. The transaction resulted in a gain on early extinguishment of debt of $17.3 million for the excess of the debt principal balance over the net book value of the property for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
In accordance with the agreement to sell 1320 Main Street, we were required to deliver the property unencumbered. On June 3, 2015, prior to the sale, we defeased the $38.7 million outstanding balance of the mortgage loan secured by 1320 Main Street. The defeasance costs and write off of the unamortized deferred financing costs, net of the write off of the unamortized premium, resulted in a net loss on early extinguishment of debt of $6.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
In accordance with the agreement to sell 2501 20th Place South, we were required to deliver the property unencumbered. On June 5, 2015, we prepaid $10.0 million of 7.36% mortgage debt at 2501 20th Place South and recognized a
13
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
loss on early extinguishment of debt totaling $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which consisted of a prepayment premium and the write off of unamortized deferred financing fees, net of the write off of an unamortized premium.
In accordance with the agreement to sell Illinois Center, we were required to deliver the property unencumbered. On August 3, 2015, prior to the sale, we defeased the outstanding $141.4 million balance of the mortgage loan secured by 111 East Wacker Drive, one of the buildings included in Illinois Center. The defeasance costs and write off of the unamortized deferred financing costs, net of the write off of the unamortized premium, resulted in a net loss on early extinguishment of debt of $3.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.
Note 9. Shareholders’ Equity
Common Share Issuances:
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we issued 144 common shares to holders of 301 of our series D cumulative convertible preferred shares (series D preferred shares) who elected to convert their series D preferred shares into our common shares.
During 2014, we issued 10,412,499 common shares to holders of 10,264,503 of our series D preferred shares who converted their series D preferred shares into our common shares.
See Note 13 for information regarding equity issuances related to share-based compensation.
Common Share Repurchases:
On August 24, 2015, our Board of Trustees approved a common share repurchase plan, which authorizes the repurchase of up to $100.0 million of our outstanding common shares over the twelve month period following the date of authorization. On September 14, 2015, our Board of Trustees authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $100.0 million of our outstanding common shares over the twelve month period following the date of authorization. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, we purchased and retired 3,410,300 of our common shares at a weighted average price of $25.76 per share.
Preferred Share Distributions:
In 2015, our Board of Trustees declared distributions on our series D preferred shares and series E cumulative redeemable preferred shares to date as follows:
Declaration Date | Record Date | Payment Date | Series D Dividend Per Share | Series E Dividend Per Share | ||||||||
January 16, 2015 | February 2, 2015 | February 17, 2015 | $ | 0.40625 | $ | 0.453125 | ||||||
April 8, 2015 | May 1, 2015 | May 15, 2015 | $ | 0.40625 | $ | 0.453125 | ||||||
July 9, 2015 | July 31, 2015 | August 17, 2015 | $ | 0.40625 | $ | 0.453125 | ||||||
October 9, 2015 | November 2, 2015 | November 16, 2015 | $ | 0.40625 | $ | 0.453125 |
Series D Preferred Shares:
The removal of our former Trustees on March 25, 2014, triggered a Fundamental Change Conversion Right of the series D preferred shares, as defined in our Articles Supplementary dated October 10, 2006, setting forth the terms of the series D preferred shares. Pursuant to such right, the holders of series D preferred shares had the option to elect to convert all or any portion of their series D preferred shares at any time from April 9, 2014 until the close of business on May 14, 2014 into a number of common shares per $25.00 liquidation preference of the series D preferred shares equal to the sum of such $25.00 liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends to, but not including, May 14, 2014, divided by 98% of the average of the closing sale prices of the common shares for the five consecutive trading days ending on May 9, 2014, or the Fundamental Change Conversion Rate. Holders of 10,263,003 series D preferred shares elected to exercise their Fundamental Change Conversion Right and converted their series D preferred shares into 10,411,779 of our common shares. As a result of this
14
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
transaction, we recorded a preferred distribution of $16.2 million, for the excess of the market value of the common shares issued above the carrying value of the series D preferred shares redeemed. As of September 30, 2015, we had 4,915,196 outstanding series D preferred shares that were convertible into 2,363,103 of our common shares.
Note 10. Cumulative Other Comprehensive Loss
The following tables present the amounts recognized in cumulative other comprehensive loss by component for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 | |||||||||||
Unrealized Loss on Derivative Instruments and Other Assets | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments | Total | |||||||||
Balances as of July 1, 2015 | $ | (5,963 | ) | $ | — | $ | (5,963 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | (418 | ) | — | (418 | ) | ||||||
Amounts reclassified from cumulative other comprehensive loss to net income | 1,239 | — | 1,239 | ||||||||
Net current period other comprehensive income | 821 | — | 821 | ||||||||
Balances as of September 30, 2015 | $ | (5,142 | ) | $ | — | $ | (5,142 | ) |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | |||||||||||
Unrealized Loss on Derivative Instruments and Other Assets | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments | Total | |||||||||
Balances as of January 1, 2015 | $ | (4,299 | ) | $ | (48,917 | ) | $ | (53,216 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | (1,461 | ) | (14,290 | ) | (15,751 | ) | |||||
Amounts reclassified from cumulative other comprehensive loss to net income | 618 | 63,207 | 63,825 | ||||||||
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | (843 | ) | 48,917 | 48,074 | |||||||
Balances as of September 30, 2015 | $ | (5,142 | ) | $ | — | $ | (5,142 | ) |
The following tables present reclassifications out of cumulative other comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 (in thousands):
Amounts Reclassified from Cumulative Other Comprehensive Loss to Net Income | ||||||||||
Details about Cumulative Other Comprehensive Loss Components | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Affected Line Items in the Statement of Operations | |||||||
Interest rate swap contracts | $ | 1,239 | $ | 3,698 | Interest expense | |||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment activity | — | 63,207 | Gain on sale of properties | |||||||
Realized gain on available for sale securities | — | (3,080 | ) | Interest and other income | ||||||
$ | 1,239 | $ | 63,825 |
15
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 11. Income Taxes
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and are generally not subject to federal and state income taxes provided we distribute a sufficient amount of our taxable income to our shareholders and meet other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. Federal income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 relates to taxes incurred as a result of a taxable built-in gain triggered by the sale of a property that was previously owned by a C corporation. We are also subject to certain state, local and Australian taxes without regard to our REIT status.
Our provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Current: | |||||||||||||||
State | $ | 90 | $ | 39 | $ | 270 | $ | 300 | |||||||
Federal | — | — | 525 | — | |||||||||||
Foreign | (67 | ) | 664 | 2,337 | 1,866 | ||||||||||
23 | 703 | 3,132 | 2,166 | ||||||||||||
Deferred: | |||||||||||||||
Foreign | — | — | (755 | ) | — | ||||||||||
— | — | (755 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | $ | 23 | $ | 703 | $ | 2,377 | $ | 2,166 |
Note 12. Derivative Instruments
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
We are exposed to certain risks relating to our ongoing business operations, including the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. The only risk we currently manage by using derivative instruments is a part of our interest rate risk.
We may use derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, caps, options, floors and other interest rate derivative contracts, to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with our borrowings. The principal objective of such arrangements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with our operating and financial structure as well as to hedge specific anticipated transactions. We do not intend to utilize derivatives for speculative or other purposes other than interest rate risk management. The use of derivative financial instruments carries certain risks, including the risk that the counterparties to these contractual arrangements are not able to perform under the agreements. To mitigate this risk, we only enter into derivative financial instruments with counterparties with high credit ratings and with major financial institutions with which we and our affiliates may also have other financial relationships. We do not anticipate that any of the counterparties will fail to meet their obligations.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we periodically use interest rate swaps, caps, or other similar instruments as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in cumulative other comprehensive loss and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During 2015, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with variable-rate debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings.
16
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Amounts reported in cumulative other comprehensive loss related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on our variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, we estimate that an additional $4.5 million will be reclassified from cumulative other comprehensive loss as an increase to interest expense.
We have interest rate swap agreements to manage our interest rate risk exposure on $170.1 million of mortgage debt due 2019, which require interest at a spread over LIBOR. The interest rate swap agreements utilized by us qualify as cash flow hedges and effectively modify our exposure to interest rate risk by converting our floating interest rate debt to a fixed interest rate basis for this loan through December 1, 2016, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. As of September 30, 2015, we had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:
Interest Rate Derivative | Number of Instruments | Notional Amount (in thousands) | |||
Interest rate swap | 2 | $170,097 |
The table below presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (amounts in thousands):
Fair Value as of | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Derivative Designated as Hedging Instrument | Balance Sheet Location | September 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||
Pay-fixed swaps | Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 5,142 | $ | 7,462 |
The table below details the location in the financial statements of the gain or loss recognized on interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (amounts in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | (5,963 | ) | $ | (10,079 | ) | $ | (7,462 | ) | $ | (11,706 | ) | |||
Amount of (loss) gain recognized in cumulative other comprehensive loss | (418 | ) | 537 | (1,378 | ) | (324 | ) | ||||||||
Amount of loss reclassified from cumulative other comprehensive loss into interest expense | 1,239 | 1,268 | 3,698 | 3,756 | |||||||||||
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments | 821 | 1,805 | 2,320 | 3,432 | |||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | (5,142 | ) | $ | (8,274 | ) | $ | (5,142 | ) | $ | (8,274 | ) |
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
We have agreements with each of our derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if we either default or are capable of being declared in default on any of our indebtedness, then we could also be declared in default on our derivative obligations.
As of September 30, 2015, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position including accrued interest but excluding any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to these agreements was $5.6 million. As of September 30, 2015, we have not posted any collateral related to these agreements and were not in breach of any agreement provisions. If we had breached any of these provisions, we could have been required to settle our obligations under the agreements at their aggregate termination value of $5.6 million at September 30, 2015.
17
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 13. Share-Based Compensation
Equity Commonwealth 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan
On June 16, 2015, at our 2015 annual meeting of shareholders, our shareholders approved the Equity Commonwealth 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2015 Incentive Plan). The 2015 Incentive Plan replaced the Equity Commonwealth 2012 Equity Compensation Plan (as amended, the 2012 Plan). The Board of Trustees approved the 2015 Incentive Plan, subject to shareholder approval, on March 18, 2015 (the Effective Date). The following description of certain terms of the 2015 Incentive Plan is qualified in all respects by the terms of the 2015 Incentive Plan.
Eligibility. Awards may be granted under the 2015 Incentive Plan to employees, officers and non-employee directors of the Company, its subsidiaries or its affiliates, or consultants and advisors (who are natural persons) providing services to the Company, its subsidiaries or its affiliates, or any other person whose participation in the 2015 Incentive Plan is determined by the Compensation Committee to be in the best interests of the Company.
Term. The 2015 Incentive Plan terminates automatically ten years after the Effective Date, unless it is terminated earlier by the Board of Trustees.
Shares Available for Issuance. Subject to adjustment as provided in the 2015 Incentive Plan, the maximum number of common shares of the Company that are available for issuance under the 2015 Incentive Plan is 3,250,000 shares.
Awards. The following types of awards may be made under the 2015 Incentive Plan, subject to limitations set forth in the 2015 Incentive Plan:
· Stock options;
· Stock appreciation rights;
· Restricted stock;
· Restricted stock units;
· Unrestricted stock;
· Dividend equivalent rights;
· Performance shares and other performance-based awards;
· Limited partnership interests in any partnership entity through which the Company may conduct its business in the future;
· Other equity-based awards; and
· Cash bonus awards.
Recipients of the Company’s restricted shares have the same voting rights as any other common shareholder. During the period of restriction, the Company’s unvested restricted shareholders are eligible to receive dividend payments on their shares at the same rate and on the same date as any other common shareholder. Recipients of the Company’s restricted stock units (RSUs) are entitled to receive dividends with respect to the common shares underlying the RSUs if and when the RSUs are earned, at which time the recipient will be entitled to receive an amount in cash equal to the aggregate amount of ordinary cash dividends that would have been paid in respect of the common shares underlying the recipient’s earned RSUs had such common shares been issued to the recipient on the first day of the performance period.
Administration. The 2015 Incentive Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee, which will determine all terms and recipients of awards under the 2015 Incentive Plan.
2012 Equity Compensation Plan
In the past, the Company has granted equity-based compensation under the 2012 Plan. The 2012 Plan authorized grants of the Company’s restricted common shares and RSUs. The 2015 Incentive Plan replaced the 2012 Plan. No future grants will be made under the 2012 Plan, although the terms and conditions of the 2012 Plan will continue to govern any outstanding awards granted under the 2012 Plan.
2015 Equity Award Activity
On June 16, 2015, in accordance with the Company’s compensation plan for independent Trustees, the Committee awarded each of the nine independent Trustees $0.1 million in restricted shares as part of their compensation for the 2015-2016
18
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
year of service on the Board of Trustees. These awards equated to 3,843 shares per Trustee, for a total of 34,587 shares, valued at $26.02 per share, the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on that day. These shares vest one year after the date of the award.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, 8,115 restricted shares were forfeited with an average per share fair value at grant date of $26.64, and 16,475 RSUs were forfeited with an average per share fair value at grant date of $20.50.
Equity Grants for 2014 Performance
On January 28, 2015, the Committee approved a grant of 126,319 restricted common shares and 256,467 RSUs at target to the Company’s officers, certain employees and to Mr. Zell, the Chairman of our Board of Trustees, as part of their compensation for fiscal year 2014.
The restricted shares are service based awards and vest over a four-year period. The restricted shares were granted on January 28, 2015 and were valued at $26.58 per share, the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on that day.
As of September 30, 2015, the estimated future compensation expense for all unvested restricted share grants was $16.0 million. Compensation expense for the restricted share awards is being recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award. The weighted average period over which the future compensation expense will be recorded for the restricted shares is approximately 3.0 years.
The RSUs are market based awards with a service condition and grant recipients may earn the RSU grants based on the Company’s total shareholder return (TSR) relative to the TSR's for the constituent REITs that comprise the NAREIT Office Index for the performance period of January 28, 2015 - January 28, 2018. Following the end of the performance period on January 28, 2018, the number of earned awards will be determined. The earned awards vest in two tranches with 50% of the earned award vesting on January 28, 2018 and the remaining 50% of the earned award vesting on January 28, 2019, subject to the grant recipient’s continued employment. Recipients of the Company’s RSUs are entitled to receive dividends with respect to the common shares underlying the RSUs if and when the RSUs are earned. To the extent that an award does not vest, the dividends will be forfeited. Compensation expense for the RSU awards was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model and is being recognized ratably from the grant date to the vesting date of each tranche.
As of September 30, 2015, the estimated future compensation expense for all unvested RSUs was $22.5 million. The weighted average period over which the future compensation expense will be recorded for the RSUs is approximately 2.7 years.
The assumptions and fair values for the RSUs granted for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 are included in the following table on a per share basis.
2015 | |||
Fair value of RSUs granted | $ | 38.55 | |
Expected term (years) | 4 | ||
Expected volatility | — | ||
Expected dividend yield | 1.88 | % | |
Risk-free rate | 0.81 | % |
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recorded $3.7 million and $11.8 million, respectively, of compensation expense, net of forfeitures, in general and administrative expense for grants to our Board of Trustees and the Company's employees related to our Plan. At September 30, 2015, 3,215,413 common shares remain available for issuance under the Plan.
Prior Equity Grants
As a result of the removal of our former Trustees on March 25, 2014, the vesting of 130,914 common shares previously issued to our former officers and certain employees of RMR pursuant to our equity compensation plans accelerated in accordance with the terms of their governing share grants. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded $3.4 million of general and administrative expense related to the vesting of these shares.
19
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 14. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
The table below presents certain of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value during 2015, categorized by the level of inputs used in the valuation of each asset and liability (dollars in thousands):
Fair Value at September 30, 2015 Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets | Significant Other Observable Inputs | Significant Unobservable Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Description | Total | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Recurring Fair Value Measurements: | ||||||||||||||||
Effective portion of interest rate swap contracts | $ | (5,142 | ) | $ | — | $ | (5,142 | ) | $ | — | ||||||
Derivative liability | (5,159 | ) | — | — | (5,159 | ) |
Effective Portion of Interest Rate Swap Contracts
The fair value of our interest rate swap contracts is determined using the net discounted cash flows of each derivative based on the market based interest rate curve (level 2 inputs) and adjusted for our credit spread and the actual and estimated credit spreads of the counterparties (level 3 inputs). Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and the counterparties. As of September 30, 2015, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified as level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy.
Derivative Liability
On July 31, 2014, our shareholders voted to approve the reimbursement of expenses incurred by Related/Corvex (Note 17). Approximately $8.4 million was to be reimbursed only if the average closing price of our common shares was at least $26.00 (as adjusted for any share splits or share dividends) during the one year period after the date on which the reimbursement was approved by shareholders, and the remaining approximately $8.4 million will be reimbursed only if the average closing price of our common shares is at least $26.00 (as adjusted for any share splits or share dividends) during the one year period between the first and second anniversaries of the date on which the reimbursement was approved by shareholders. The average closing price of our common shares was at least $26.00 during the first one year period after the date on which the reimbursement was approved by shareholders, and in August 2015, we paid $8.4 million to Related/Corvex. The potential future reimbursement represents a derivative instrument as codified in ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging which requires the potential future reimbursement to be recorded at fair value at each reporting date.
The fair value of the derivative liability as of December 31, 2014 was $6.7 million. The change in the fair value of $4.6 million and $6.9 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was recorded in general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. The valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used for our level 3 fair value measurement at September 30, 2015 were as follows:
Description | Fair Value at September 30, 2015 | Primary Valuation Technique | Unobservable Inputs | Rate | ||||||
Derivative liability | $ | 5,159 | Monte Carlo simulation | Risk-free rate | 0.25% | |||||
Volatility | 20.0% |
20
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Financial Instruments
In addition to the assets and liabilities described in the above table, our financial instruments include our cash and cash equivalents, real estate mortgages receivable, restricted cash, senior unsecured debt and mortgage notes payable. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the fair value of these additional financial instruments were not materially different from their carrying values, except as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Senior unsecured debt and mortgage notes payable, net | $ | 1,828,073 | $ | 1,885,499 | $ | 2,207,665 | $ | 2,263,535 |
The fair values of our senior notes and mortgage notes payable are based on estimates using discounted cash flow analyses and currently prevailing interest rates adjusted by credit risk spreads (level 3 inputs).
Our cash and cash equivalents consists of cash maintained in time deposits, depository accounts and money market accounts. From time-to-time we may also invest in various U.S. government securities. We continually monitor the credit ratings of the financial institutions holding our deposits to minimize our exposure to credit risk. Throughout the year, we have cash balances in excess of federally insured limits deposited with various financial institutions. We do not believe we are exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.
Other financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of rents receivable; however, as of September 30, 2015, no single tenant of ours is responsible for more than 4% of our total annualized rents.
Our derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, are entered with major financial institutions and we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one counterparty.
21
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 15. Earnings Per Common Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (amounts in thousands except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Numerator for earnings per common share - basic: | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 30,466 | $ | 156,523 | $ | 56,712 | $ | 179,936 | |||||||
Preferred distributions | (6,981 | ) | (6,981 | ) | (20,943 | ) | (25,114 | ) | |||||||
Excess fair value of consideration over carrying vale of preferred shares | — | — | — | (16,205 | ) | ||||||||||
Income from continuing operations attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders | 23,485 | 149,542 | 35,769 | 138,617 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations | — | 217 | — | 2,637 | |||||||||||
Numerator for net income per share - basic | $ | 23,485 | $ | 149,759 | $ | 35,769 | $ | 141,254 | |||||||
Numerator for earnings per common share - diluted: | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders | 23,485 | 149,542 | 35,769 | 138,617 | |||||||||||
Addition of Series D preferred distributions | — | 1,998 | — | — | |||||||||||
Diluted income from continuing operations attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders | 23,485 | 151,540 | 35,769 | 138,617 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations | — | 217 | — | 2,637 | |||||||||||
Numerator for net income per share - diluted | 23,485 | 151,757 | 35,769 | 141,254 | |||||||||||
Denominator for earnings per common share - basic and diluted: | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic | 128,739 | 128,880 | 129,386 | 123,736 | |||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted(1) | 129,878 | 131,243 | 130,093 | 123,736 | |||||||||||
Earnings per share - basic: | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders | $ | 0.18 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 1.12 | |||||||
Discontinued operations | — | — | — | 0.02 | |||||||||||
Net income per share - basic | $ | 0.18 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 1.14 | |||||||
Earnings per share - diluted: | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders | $ | 0.18 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 1.12 | |||||||
Discontinued operations | — | — | — | 0.02 | |||||||||||
Net income per share - diluted | $ | 0.18 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 1.14 | |||||||
Anti-dilutive securities: | |||||||||||||||
Effect of Series D preferred shares; 6 1/2% cumulative convertible(2) | 2,363 | — | 2,363 | 4,786 |
(1) | As of September 30, 2015, we had granted RSUs to certain employees, officers, and the chairman of the Board of Trustees. The RSUs contain both service and market-based vesting components. None of the RSUs have vested. If the |
22
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
market-based vesting component was measured as of September 30, 2015, 1,139 common shares would be issued to the RSU holders, and no shares would have been issued for the other periods presented. Using a weighted average basis, 1,139 and 707 common shares are reflected in diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.
(2) | The Series D preferred shares are excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because including the Series D preferred shares would also require that the preferred distributions be added back to net income, resulting in anti-dilution during the periods presented. |
Note 16. Segment Information
Our primary business is the ownership and operation of office properties. We have two reportable segments based on our primary method of internal reporting: CBD properties and suburban properties. More than 90% of our revenues from CBD and suburban properties are from office properties. Our operating segments (i.e., our individual properties) are managed and operated consistently in accordance with our standard operating procedures. We use property net operating income, or NOI, to evaluate the performance of our operating segments. We define NOI as income from our real estate including lease termination fees received from tenants less our property operating expenses. NOI excludes amortization of capitalized tenant improvement costs and leasing commissions.
As of September 30, 2015, we owned 24 CBD properties (31 buildings) and 43 suburban properties (101 buildings), excluding assets held for sale as of September 30, 2015. Property level information by operating segment as of September 30, 2015, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, is as follows (in thousands):
As of September 30, | |||||
2015 | 2014 | ||||
Square feet: | |||||
CBD properties | 13,975 | 21,892 | |||
Suburban properties | 11,311 | 21,027 | |||
Total properties(1) | 25,286 | 42,919 |
(1) Square footage of properties owned as of the respective dates.
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Rental income: | |||||||||||||||
CBD properties | $ | 85,494 | $ | 109,822 | $ | 303,686 | $ | 326,155 | |||||||
Suburban properties | 39,965 | 64,394 | 153,442 | 192,508 | |||||||||||
Total properties | $ | 125,459 | $ | 174,216 | $ | 457,128 | $ | 518,663 | |||||||
Tenant reimbursements and other income: | |||||||||||||||
CBD properties | $ | 23,054 | $ | 27,653 | $ | 80,434 | $ | 86,359 | |||||||
Suburban properties | 10,695 | 14,726 | 38,395 | 44,027 | |||||||||||
Total properties | $ | 33,749 | $ | 42,379 | $ | 118,829 | $ | 130,386 | |||||||
NOI: | |||||||||||||||
CBD properties | $ | 53,564 | $ | 71,596 | $ | 203,077 | $ | 216,762 | |||||||
Suburban properties | 32,073 | 45,607 | 111,752 | 138,463 | |||||||||||
Total properties | $ | 85,637 | $ | 117,203 | $ | 314,829 | $ | 355,225 |
As of September 30, 2015, our investments in CBD properties and suburban properties, net of accumulated depreciation, were $2,027.3 million and $1,060.9 million, respectively.
The following table includes the reconciliation of NOI to net income, the most directly comparable financial measure under GAAP reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements. We consider NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because it may help both investors and management to understand the operations of our properties. We
23
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
use NOI internally to evaluate individual, regional and combined property level performance, and we believe that NOI provides useful information to investors regarding our results of operations because it reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level and may facilitate comparisons of our operating performance between periods and with other REITs. NOI does not represent cash generated by operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, net income attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders, operating income or cash flow from operating activities, determined in accordance with GAAP, or as an indicator of our financial performance or liquidity, nor is this measure necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. This measure should be considered in conjunction with net income, net income attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders, operating income and cash flow from operating activities as presented in our condensed consolidated statements of operations, condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Other REITs and real estate companies may calculate NOI differently than we do.
A reconciliation of NOI to net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 125,459 | $ | 174,216 | $ | 457,128 | $ | 518,663 | |||||||
Tenant reimbursements and other income | 33,749 | 42,379 | 118,829 | 130,386 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses | (73,571 | ) | (99,392 | ) | (261,128 | ) | (293,824 | ) | |||||||
NOI | $ | 85,637 | $ | 117,203 | $ | 314,829 | $ | 355,225 | |||||||
NOI | $ | 85,637 | $ | 117,203 | $ | 314,829 | $ | 355,225 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | (40,522 | ) | (57,213 | ) | (156,858 | ) | (168,693 | ) | |||||||
General and administrative | (16,249 | ) | (47,450 | ) | (43,718 | ) | (96,395 | ) | |||||||
Loss on asset impairment | — | — | (17,162 | ) | (17,922 | ) | |||||||||
Acquisition related costs | — | — | — | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating income | 28,866 | 12,540 | 97,091 | 72,210 | |||||||||||
Interest and other income | 637 | 406 | 4,813 | 1,071 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (25,111 | ) | (35,245 | ) | (82,926 | ) | (111,079 | ) | |||||||
(Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt | (3,887 | ) | 6,699 | 6,111 | 6,699 | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of equity investments | — | 171,754 | — | 171,721 | |||||||||||
Gain on issuance of shares by an equity investee | — | — | — | 17,020 | |||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange loss | (9,809 | ) | — | (8,953 | ) | — | |||||||||
Gain on sale of properties | 39,793 | — | 42,953 | — | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of investees | 30,489 | 156,154 | 59,089 | 157,642 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | (23 | ) | (703 | ) | (2,377 | ) | (2,166 | ) | |||||||
Equity in earnings of investees | — | 1,072 | — | 24,460 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 30,466 | 156,523 | 56,712 | 179,936 | |||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations | — | 95 | — | 8,220 | |||||||||||
Gain (loss) on asset impairment from discontinued operations | — | 122 | — | (2,238 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt from discontinued operations | — | — | — | (3,345 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 30,466 | $ | 156,740 | $ | 56,712 | $ | 182,573 |
24
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 17. Related Person Transactions
The following discussion includes a description of our related person transactions for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. Certain of these related person transactions, and their approvals, occurred prior to the election of our new Board of Trustees at the Special Meeting and the appointment of our current executive officers following the Special Meeting. The disclosure below under “—Transactions with Prior Related Persons” describes our transactions and approvals with our prior related persons.
Related Person Transactions Following the Special Meeting:
Equity Group Investments and associated entities: Effective July 20, 2015, we entered into a lease with Two North Riverside Plaza Joint Venture Limited Partnership, an entity associated with Mr. Zell, our Chairman, to occupy office space on the twentieth and twenty-first floors of Two North Riverside Plaza in Chicago, Illinois. The initial term of the lease is approximately five years, with one 5-year renewal option. The lease payment is approximately $0.5 million for the initial year beginning in 2016, and $0.8 million annually thereafter. This lease was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees on June 16, 2015.
Effective June 1, 2014, we entered into a one-year license agreement with Equity Group Investments, a private investment firm (Equity Group), to use office space on the sixth floor at Two North Riverside Plaza in Chicago, Illinois. The license fee was $0.2 million for the initial year. The license fee includes the non-exclusive use of additional areas on the sixth floor (such as conference rooms and common areas), certain administrative services (such as mail room services and reception desk staffing), office equipment, office furniture, supplies, licensee’s share of building operating expenses and real estate taxes and access to one parking space. Mr. Zell, our Chairman, is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Equity Group, and Mr. Helfand, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is the Co-President of Equity Group. This license agreement was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees and was scheduled to expire on May 31, 2015. On May 4, 2015, the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees approved an agreement to extend the term of the license agreement through November 30, 2015. The license fee payment is approximately $0.1 million for the extended term. On November 2, 2015, the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees approved an agreement to extend the term of the license agreement through January 31, 2016, for a maximum license fee payment of approximately $0.1 million.
Effective June 1, 2014, we entered into a one-year lease with one 3-month renewal option with Two North Riverside Plaza Joint Venture Limited Partnership, an entity associated with Mr. Zell, our Chairman, to occupy office space on the fourteenth floor at Two North Riverside Plaza in Chicago, Illinois. The lease payment was $0.2 million for the initial term. This lease was terminated, effective January 31, 2015. This lease was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees.
Effective July 31, 2014, we entered into a sublease with Equity Residential Management, L.L.C. to occupy office space on the tenth floor of Two North Riverside Plaza in Chicago, Illinois. Equity Residential Management, L.L.C. leases the space from Two North Riverside Plaza Joint Venture Limited Partnership, an entity associated with Mr. Zell, our Chairman. The initial term of the sublease was approximately seven months commencing on or about October 22, 2014, expiring on May 31, 2015, with one 3-month renewal option. The sublease payment was approximately $0.2 million for the initial term. This sublease was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees. On May 4, 2015, the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees approved an agreement to extend the term of the sublease through November 30, 2015. The sublease payment is approximately $0.2 million for the extended term. On November 2, 2015, the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees approved an agreement to extend the term of the license agreement through January 31, 2016, for a maximum sublease payment of approximately $0.1 million.
Related/Corvex: On July 31, 2014, at the reconvened session of our 2014 annual meeting of shareholders, our shareholders voted to approve the reimbursement of approximately $33.5 million of expenses incurred by Related/Corvex since February 2013 in connection with their consent solicitations to remove our former Trustees and elect the new Board of Trustees and to engage in related litigation. Approximately $16.7 million was paid during the year ended December 31, 2014. Approximately $8.4 million was to be reimbursed only if the average closing price of our common shares is at least $26.00 (as adjusted for any share splits or share dividends) during the one year period after the date on which the reimbursement was approved by shareholders, and the remaining approximately $8.4 million will be reimbursed only if the average closing price of our common shares is at least $26.00 (as adjusted for any share splits or share dividends) during the one year period between the first and second anniversaries of the date on which the reimbursement was approved by shareholders. The average closing
25
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
price of our common shares was at least $26.00 during the first one year period after the date on which the reimbursement was approved by shareholders, and in August 2015, we paid $8.4 million to Related/Corvex.
Transactions with Prior Related Persons:
RMR: Prior to entering into the Termination and Cooperation Agreement with RMR, as further described below, we had three primary agreements with RMR and its affiliates to provide management and administrative services to us: (i) a business management agreement, which relates to our business generally, (ii) a property management agreement, which relates to our property level operations, and (iii) an Australia business and property management agreement, which relates to our Australian properties.
During the time we were externally managed by RMR, one of our former Managing Trustees, Mr. Barry Portnoy, was Chairman, majority owner and an employee of RMR. Another former Managing Trustee and our former President, Mr. Adam Portnoy, is the son of Mr. Barry Portnoy, and was an owner, President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of RMR. As a result of the removal, effective March 25, 2014, of Mr. Barry Portnoy and Mr. Adam Portnoy as Trustees of the Company and the resignation on May 23, 2014, of Mr. Adam D. Portnoy, Mr. John C. Popeo, Mr. David M. Lepore and other officers of RMR from their respective positions as officers of the Company, they, RMR, RMR Australia Asset Management Pty Limited, or RMR Australia, SIR and AIC have ceased to be related persons of the Company. Therefore, we only present related person transactions with these entities through June 30, 2014.
Pursuant to our business management agreement with RMR, we recognized business management fee expense of $31.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The fees for the six months ended June 30, 2014, include estimated 2014 incentive fees payable in common shares based on our common share total return. These amounts are included in general and administrative expenses, in our condensed consolidated financial statements. In accordance with the terms of our business management agreement, as amended in December 2013, we issued 68,206 of our common shares to RMR for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as payment for 10% of the base business management fee we recognized for such period. In connection with our property management agreement with RMR, the aggregate property management and construction supervision fees we recognized were $13.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. These amounts are included in operating expenses or have been capitalized, as appropriate, in our condensed consolidated financial statements.
On January 31, 2013, we entered into a business and property management agreement (Australia Management Agreement) with RMR Australia. RMR Australia is owned by our former Managing Trustees and our former President. RMR has agreed to waive half of the fees payable by us under our property management agreement with RMR and half of the business management fees otherwise payable by us under our business management agreement with RMR related to real estate investments that are subject to the Australia Management Agreement for so long as the Australia Management Agreement is in effect and we or any of our subsidiaries are paying the fees under that agreement. Pursuant to the Australia Management Agreement, we recognized aggregate business and property management fee expense of $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, which amounts are equal to the fees waived by RMR and excluded from the amount that was payable to RMR during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Termination and Cooperation Agreement: On September 30, 2014, we entered into a termination and cooperation agreement (Cooperation Agreement) with RMR and RMR Australia (together, Manager). Under the terms of the agreement, the existing business and property management agreements with RMR terminated effective September 30, 2014.
Pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement, through February 28, 2015, Manager agreed to use best efforts to assist us in the transition of our management and operations. We paid Manager $1.2 million per month for transition services from October 1, 2014 to February 28, 2015, which included continued management and other services for the Australian assets pursuant to the Australian Management Agreement. Beginning March 1, 2015, we agreed to pay Manager $0.1 million per month until we no longer required such services or until the Australia Management Agreement was terminated, which was terminated in the third quarter of 2015, effective October 31, 2015. There is no future obligation to pay any fees to Manager.
SIR: SIR was formerly our 100% owned subsidiary. In March 2012, SIR completed an initial public offering, or the SIR IPO. As of June 30, 2014, we owned 22,000,000 common shares of SIR, which represented approximately 36.7% of SIR’s outstanding common shares. On July 9, 2014, we sold our entire stake of 22,000,000 common shares of SIR, for $32.04 per share, raising aggregate gross proceeds of $704.8 million. As a result of this sale, we no longer hold any interest in SIR.
26
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
AIC: We previously owned 12.5% of AIC, an Indiana insurance company, and, as of May 9, 2014, had invested $5.2 million in AIC since we became an equity owner of AIC in 2009. RMR, SIR and five other companies to which RMR provides management services also own shares of AIC. The other shareholders of AIC, on May 9, 2014, exercised their right to purchase the 20,000 shares of AIC we then owned. We received $5.8 million in aggregate proceeds from this sale and we no longer own any interest in AIC.
We previously purchased property insurance providing $500.0 million of coverage pursuant to an insurance program arranged by AIC and with respect to which AIC was a reinsurer of certain coverage amounts. This program expired in June 2014.
Indemnification: Pursuant to our declaration of trust and separate indemnification agreements, we have advanced amounts incurred for legal fees and costs on behalf of certain of the former Trustees and officers with respect to the legal proceedings described in Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings” in this Quarterly Report. Pursuant to indemnification provisions in our business and property management agreements with RMR, we have also incurred legal fees and costs on behalf of RMR for claims brought against RMR in its capacity as our business and property manager with respect to certain legal proceedings described in Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings” in this Quarterly Report. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we incurred approximately $5.4 million in such legal fees and costs.
Note 18. Subsequent Events
In October 2015, we sold seven properties (13 buildings), with 1,263,809 square feet for $131.2 million in a series of transactions (see Note 4). These properties were classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2015.
27
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in this Quarterly Report, and in our Annual Report.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements contained in this Quarterly Report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Any forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report are intended to be made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In particular, statements pertaining to our capital resources, portfolio performance and results of operations contain forward-looking statements. Likewise, all of our statements regarding anticipated growth in market conditions are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” or “potential” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases which are predictions of or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions.
The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report reflect our current views about future events and are subject to numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may cause our actual results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, of new information, data or methods, future events or other changes. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements, see the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
OVERVIEW
We are an internally managed and self-advised REIT engaged in the ownership and operation primarily of office buildings in CBD and suburban locations throughout the United States. We were formed in 1986 under Maryland law.
At September 30, 2015, our portfolio, excluding properties held for sale, included 67 properties (132 buildings) with a combined 25.3 million square feet for a total investment of $4.0 billion at cost and a depreciated book value of $3.1 billion. Our portfolio consisted of: (i) 24 properties (31 buildings) with a combined 14.0 million square feet located in CBD locations, and (ii) 43 properties (101 buildings) with a combined 11.3 million square feet located in suburban locations.
As of September 30, 2015, our overall portfolio was 91.9% leased. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we entered into leases for 1,384,000 square feet, including lease renewals for 955,000 square feet and new leases for 429,000 square feet. Renewal leases entered into during the three months ended September 30, 2015 had weighted average cash and GAAP rental rates that were approximately 3.1% higher and 8.5% higher, respectively, as compared to prior rental rates for the same space, and new leases entered into during the three months ended September 30, 2015 had weighted average cash and GAAP rental rates that were approximately 3.6% higher and 11.4% higher, respectively, than prior rental rates for the same space. The change in GAAP rents is different than the change in cash rents due to differences in the amount of rent abatement, the magnitude and timing of contractual rent increases over the lease term, and the years of term for the newly executed leases compared to the prior leases.
On January 29, 2015, we entered into a new $1.15 billion credit agreement that reduced the interest rate and extended the term of our unsecured revolving credit facility and term loan. Pursuant to the new credit agreement, the lenders agreed to provide (i) a $750.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, (ii) a $200.0 million 5-year term loan and (iii) a $200.0 million 7-year term loan.
Following the election of our new Board of Trustees and internalization of management in 2014, our new management team has focused on developing a plan to reshape our portfolio in order to create long-term value for shareholders. We suspended our former Trustees' repositioning plan and ceased to actively market properties which we had previously classified as held for sale that were not already subject to a binding sale agreement. This resulted in the reclassification of two CBD
28
properties (two buildings) and 29 suburban properties (65 buildings) with a combined 5,641,450 square feet, which we had previously classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013, to properties held and used in operations. In connection with this reclassification, we reversed previously recorded impairment charges totaling $4.8 million, which includes the elimination of estimated costs to sell. The financial information presented in this Quarterly Report reflects the reclassification of these properties for all periods presented.
We have undertaken a comprehensive review of our portfolio and operations and have developed a new business strategy that focuses on reshaping our portfolio over time. We anticipate that as part of this plan, we will dispose of a significant portion of our properties that do not meet our long-term goals. Specifically, our Board of Trustees adopted a strategy to consider disposing of assets that have one or more of the following attributes: (1) assets that do not offer an opportunity to create a competitive advantage, (2) assets that are less than 150,000 square feet, (3) assets that are not office buildings, (4) assets that are not located in the U.S., or (5) assets that produce a low cash yield or require significant capital expenditures. In February 2015, we announced that we were in the early stages of implementing this plan and that we hope to sell up to $3.0 billion of assets, depending on market conditions. We expect to sell assets on a one-off basis as well as in portfolio transactions, where appropriate.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we sold 81 properties (116 buildings) and one land parcel with a combined 16,049,648 square feet for an aggregate gross sales price of $1.7 billion, excluding closing costs. In October 2015, we sold seven properties (13 buildings), with 1,263,809 square feet for $131.2 million in a series of transactions (see Note 4). These properties were classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2015. For more information regarding these transactions, see Note 4 to the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.
As a result of the taxable losses recognized on property sales in 2015 and the net operating loss carryforward from 2014, we do not anticipate that a distribution to common shareholders will be required in 2015. The Board of Trustees has regularly reviewed our dividend policy and will continue to do so, at least annually.
As part of the disposition plan noted above, and pursuant to our accounting policy, we evaluated the recoverability of the carrying values of each of the real estate assets that comprised our portfolio and determined that due to the shortening of the expected periods of ownership and as a result of the disposition plan, it was necessary to reduce the net book value of a portion of the real estate assets in our portfolio to reduce the assets to their estimated fair values. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recorded an impairment charge of $17.2 million in accordance with our impairment analysis procedures.
We expect to reinvest the capital received from dispositions to purchase new properties, repay debt, buy back shares or make other investments or distributions that further our long-term strategic goals. However, we may not be able to make acquisitions or other investments with the proceeds of the dispositions at the same pace that we are making such dispositions. Thus, as we transform our portfolio over the next several years, the timing of dispositions and acquisitions may cause significant shifts in our balance sheet, particularly with respect to our real estate assets and cash. If our real estate investments decrease significantly, income from operations may also decline.
Effective September 30, 2014, we terminated our business and property management relationships with RMR for our U.S. properties pursuant to a termination and cooperation agreement, which we refer to as the Cooperation Agreement. Pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement, through February 28, 2015, RMR and RMR Australia, which we refer to together as Manager, agreed to use best efforts to assist us in the transition of our management and operations. We paid Manager $1.2 million per month for transition services from October 1, 2014 to February 28, 2015, which included continued management and other services for the Australian assets pursuant to an existing management agreement, or the Australia Management Agreement. Beginning March 1, 2015, we agreed to pay Manager $0.1 million per month until we no longer required such services or until the Australia Management Agreement was terminated, which was terminated in the third quarter of 2015, effective October 31, 2015. The $2.6 million incurred pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 is included in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated financial statements and is net of certain amounts due from RMR. There is no future obligation to pay any fees to Manager.
Effective October 1, 2014, we engaged CBRE to provide property management services for our U.S. properties. We pay CBRE a property-by-property management fee and may engage CBRE from time-to-time to perform project management services, such as coordinating and overseeing the completion of tenant improvements and other capital projects at the properties. We reimburse CBRE for certain expenses incurred in the performance of its duties, including certain personnel and equipment costs.
29
For the three and nine month ended September 30, 2015, we incurred expenses of $9.8 million and $34.6 million, respectively, related to our property management agreement with CBRE, for property management fees, typically calculated as a portion of the properties revenues, and salary and benefits reimbursements for property personnel, such as property managers, engineers and maintenance staff. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had amounts payable pursuant to these services of $4.9 million and $6.7 million, respectively.
Property Operations
Occupancy data for 2015 and 2014 are as follows (square feet in thousands):
All Properties(1) | Comparable Properties(2) | ||||||||||
As of September 30, | As of September 30, | ||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
Total properties | 67 | 156 | 67 | 67 | |||||||
Total square feet | 25,286 | 42,919 | 25,286 | 25,286 | |||||||
Percent leased(3) | 91.9 | % | 85.9 | % | 91.9 | % | 90.6 | % |
(1) | Excludes properties sold or classified as held for sale in the period. |
(2) | Based on properties owned continuously from January 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015, and excludes properties sold or classified as held for sale during the period ended September 30, 2015 and properties classified as discontinued operations for the period ended September 30, 2014. |
(3) | Percent leased includes (i) space being fitted out for occupancy pursuant to existing leases and (ii) space which is leased but is not occupied or is being offered for sublease by tenants. |
The weighted average lease term based on square feet for leases entered into during the three months ended September 30, 2015 was 6.3 years. Commitments made for leasing expenditures and concessions, such as tenant improvements and leasing commissions, for leases entered into during the three months ended September 30, 2015 totaled $54.5 million, or $39.35 per square foot on average (approximately $6.22 per square foot per year of the lease term).
As of September 30, 2015, approximately 3.3% of our leased square feet and 5.6% of our annualized rental revenue, determined as set forth below, are included in leases scheduled to expire through December 31, 2015. Renewed and new leases and rental rates at which available space may be relet in the future will depend on prevailing market conditions at the times these leases are negotiated. We believe that the in-place cash rents for leases expiring for the remainder of 2015 are slightly above market. Lease expirations by year, as of September 30, 2015, are as follows (square feet and dollars in thousands):
Year | Number of Tenants Expiring | Square Feet Expiring(1) | % of Square Feet Expiring(1) | Cumulative % of Square Feet Expiring(1) | Annualized Rental Revenue Expiring(2) | % of Annualized Rental Revenue Expiring | Cumulative % of Annualized Rental Revenue Expiring | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 80 | 765 | 3.3 | % | 3.3 | % | $ | 28,877 | 5.6 | % | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||
2016 | 161 | 2,268 | 9.8 | % | 13.1 | % | 44,395 | 8.6 | % | 14.2 | % | |||||||||||
2017 | 152 | 2,226 | 9.6 | % | 22.7 | % | 47,948 | 9.2 | % | 23.4 | % | |||||||||||
2018 | 157 | 2,550 | 11.0 | % | 33.7 | % | 65,138 | 12.5 | % | 35.9 | % | |||||||||||
2019 | 111 | 1,642 | 7.1 | % | 40.8 | % | 44,810 | 8.6 | % | 44.5 | % | |||||||||||
2020 | 128 | 4,034 | 17.3 | % | 58.1 | % | 54,881 | 10.6 | % | 55.1 | % | |||||||||||
2021 | 71 | 2,008 | 8.6 | % | 66.7 | % | 47,673 | 9.2 | % | 64.3 | % | |||||||||||
2022 | 44 | 968 | 4.2 | % | 70.9 | % | 27,946 | 5.4 | % | 69.7 | % | |||||||||||
2023 | 46 | 1,620 | 7.0 | % | 77.9 | % | 43,156 | 8.3 | % | 78.0 | % | |||||||||||
2024 | 20 | 612 | 2.6 | % | 80.5 | % | 12,352 | 2.4 | % | 80.4 | % | |||||||||||
Thereafter | 67 | 4,541 | 19.5 | % | 100.0 | % | 101,996 | 19.6 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
1,037 | 23,234 | 100.0 | % | $ | 519,172 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years): | 5.9 | 5.7 |
30
(1) | Square feet is pursuant to existing leases as of September 30, 2015, and includes (i) space being fitted out for occupancy and (ii) space which is leased but is not occupied or is being offered for sublease by tenants. |
(2) | Annualized rental revenue is annualized contractual rents from our tenants pursuant to leases which have commenced as of September 30, 2015, plus estimated recurring expense reimbursements; includes some triple net lease rents and excludes lease value amortization, straight line rent adjustments, free rent periods, and parking revenue. |
A principal source of funds for our operations is rents from tenants at our properties. Rents are generally received from our tenants monthly in advance, except from our government tenants, who usually pay rents monthly in arrears. As of September 30, 2015, tenants representing 1% or more of our total annualized rental revenue were as follows (square feet in thousands):
Tenant | Square Feet(1) | % of Total Square Feet(1) | % of Annualized Rental Revenue(2) | Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term | ||||||||
1. | Expedia, Inc. | 398 | 1.7 | % | 3.4 | % | 3.1 | |||||
2. | Office Depot, Inc. | 640 | 2.8 | % | 3.1 | % | 8.1 | |||||
3. | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. | 414 | 1.8 | % | 3.1 | % | 16.5 | |||||
4. | PNC Financial Services Group | 587 | 2.5 | % | 2.9 | % | 5.4 | |||||
5. | Flextronics International Ltd. | 1,051 | 4.5 | % | 2.1 | % | 4.3 | |||||
6. | J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. | 356 | 1.5 | % | 2.0 | % | 9.2 | |||||
7. | Level 3 Communications, Inc. | 212 | 0.9 | % | 1.9 | % | 4.7 | |||||
8. | Groupon, Inc. | 394 | 1.7 | % | 1.8 | % | 9.9 | |||||
9. | Jones Day | 343 | 1.5 | % | 1.7 | % | 10.8 | |||||
10. | Towers Watson & Co | 376 | 1.6 | % | 1.6 | % | 4.2 | |||||
11. | Ballard Spahr LLP | 218 | 0.9 | % | 1.5 | % | 14.4 | |||||
12. | Carmike Cinemas, Inc. | 552 | 2.4 | % | 1.5 | % | 0.9 | |||||
13. | RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. | 249 | 1.1 | % | 1.4 | % | 12.6 | |||||
14. | Sunoco | 147 | 0.6 | % | 1.3 | % | 2.0 | |||||
15. | Exelon Corporation | 279 | 1.2 | % | 1.3 | % | 2.7 | |||||
16. | Georgetown University | 241 | 1.0 | % | 1.2 | % | 4.0 | |||||
17. | The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. | 99 | 0.4 | % | 1.1 | % | 6.2 | |||||
18. | University of Pennsylvania Health System | 238 | 1.0 | % | 1.1 | % | 6.1 | |||||
19. | Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company | 150 | 0.6 | % | 1.1 | % | 6.3 | |||||
20. | FMC Corporation | 207 | 0.9 | % | 1.0 | % | 0.7 | |||||
Total | 7,151 | 30.6 | % | 36.1 | % | 6.5 |
(1) | Square footage is pursuant to existing leases as of September 30, 2015, and includes (i) space being fitted out for occupancy and (ii) space which is leased but is not occupied or is being offered for sublease by tenants. |
(2) | Annualized rental revenue is annualized contractual rents from our tenants pursuant to existing leases as of September 30, 2015, plus straight line rent adjustments and estimated recurring expense reimbursements; includes some triple net lease rents and excludes lease value amortization. |
Financing Activities
On August 3, 2015, we defeased the $141.4 million outstanding balance of the mortgage loan secured by 111 East Wacker Drive, one of the buildings included in Illinois Center. The defeasance costs and write off of the unamortized deferred financing costs, net of the write off of the unamortized premium, resulted in a net loss on early extinguishment of debt of $3.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.
On June 5, 2015, we prepaid $10.0 million of 7.36% mortgage debt at 2501 20th Place South and recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.6 million due to a prepayment penalty for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
31
On June 3, 2015, we defeased the $38.7 million outstanding balance of the mortgage loan secured by 1320 Main Street. The defeasance costs and write off of the unamortized deferred financing costs, net of the write off of the unamortized premium, resulted in a net loss on early extinguishment of debt of $6.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
On May 22, 2015, title to 225 Water Street was transferred to the lender pursuant to the consensual foreclosure in full satisfaction of the mortgage debt, with a principal balance of $40.1 million. The transaction resulted in a gain on early extinguishment of debt of $17.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
On May 1, 2015, we redeemed at par $138.8 million of our 5.75% senior unsecured notes due 2015 and recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
On January 29, 2015, we entered into a new credit agreement, pursuant to which the lenders agreed to provide (i) a $750.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, (ii) a $200.0 million 5-year term loan facility and (iii) a $200.0 million 7-year term loan facility. The new credit agreement, which replaced our prior credit agreement and our prior term loan agreement, reduces the interest rate and extends the term of our revolving credit facility and term loan borrowings. The revolving credit facility has a scheduled maturity date of January 28, 2019, with two six-month extension options subject to certain conditions and the payment of an extension fee. The 5-year term loan and the 7-year term loan have scheduled maturity dates of January 28, 2020 and January 28, 2022, respectively, and have been fully funded. We used the proceeds from the new term loans to repay all amounts outstanding and due under the previous term loan agreement. We do not currently have any amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility.
For more information regarding our financing sources and activities, please see the section captioned “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Our Investment and Financing Liquidity and Resources” below.
32
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015, Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Comparable Properties Results(1) | Other Properties Results(2) | Consolidated Results | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBD properties(3) | $ | 76,201 | $ | 76,968 | $ | (767 | ) | (1.0 | )% | $ | 9,293 | $ | 32,854 | $ | 85,494 | $ | 109,822 | $ | (24,328 | ) | (22.2 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Suburban properties | 34,497 | 35,244 | (747 | ) | (2.1 | )% | 5,468 | 29,150 | 39,965 | 64,394 | (24,429 | ) | (37.9 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income | 110,698 | 112,212 | (1,514 | ) | (1.3 | )% | 14,761 | 62,004 | 125,459 | 174,216 | (48,757 | ) | (28.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenant reimbursements and other income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBD properties | 20,404 | 19,053 | 1,351 | 7.1 | % | 2,650 | 8,600 | 23,054 | 27,653 | (4,599 | ) | (16.6 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suburban properties | 9,717 | 8,817 | 900 | 10.2 | % | 978 | 5,909 | 10,695 | 14,726 | (4,031 | ) | (27.4 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenant reimbursements and other income | 30,121 | 27,870 | 2,251 | 8.1 | % | 3,628 | 14,509 | 33,749 | 42,379 | (8,630 | ) | (20.4 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBD properties | 45,894 | 44,038 | 1,856 | 4.2 | % | 9,090 | 21,841 | 54,984 | 65,879 | (10,895 | ) | (16.5 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suburban properties | 16,288 | 16,424 | (136 | ) | (0.8 | )% | 2,299 | 17,089 | 18,587 | 33,513 | (14,926 | ) | (44.5 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 62,182 | 60,462 | 1,720 | 2.8 | % | 11,389 | 38,930 | 73,571 | 99,392 | (25,821 | ) | (26.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income(4): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBD properties | 50,711 | 51,983 | (1,272 | ) | (2.4 | )% | 2,853 | 19,613 | 53,564 | 71,596 | (18,032 | ) | (25.2 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Suburban properties | 27,926 | 27,637 | 289 | 1.0 | % | 4,147 | 17,970 | 32,073 | 45,607 | (13,534 | ) | (29.7 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income | $ | 78,637 | $ | 79,620 | $ | (983 | ) | (1.2 | )% | $ | 7,000 | $ | 37,583 | 85,637 | 117,203 | (31,566 | ) | (26.9 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 40,522 | 57,213 | (16,691 | ) | (29.2 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 16,249 | 47,450 | (31,201 | ) | (65.8 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other expenses | 56,771 | 104,663 | (47,892 | ) | (45.8 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | 28,866 | 12,540 | 16,326 | 130.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income | 637 | 406 | 231 | 56.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (25,111 | ) | (35,245 | ) | 10,134 | (28.8 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt | (3,887 | ) | 6,699 | (10,586 | ) | (158.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of equity investment | — | 171,754 | (171,754 | ) | (100.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange loss | (9,809 | ) | — | (9,809 | ) | (100.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of properties | 39,793 | — | 39,793 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of investees | 30,489 | 156,154 | (125,665 | ) | (80.5 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | (23 | ) | (703 | ) | 680 | (96.7 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of investees | — | 1,072 | (1,072 | ) | (100.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 30,466 | 156,523 | (126,057 | ) | (80.5 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations | — | 95 | (95 | ) | (100.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on asset impairment from discontinued operations | — | 122 | (122 | ) | (100.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 30,466 | 156,740 | (126,274 | ) | (80.6 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred distributions | (6,981 | ) | (6,981 | ) | — | — | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders | $ | 23,485 | $ | 149,759 | $ | (126,274 | ) | (84.3 | )% |
(1) | Comparable properties consist of 67 properties (132 buildings) we owned continuously from July 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015. |
(2) | Other properties consist of properties sold and classified as held for sale. |
(3) | During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we recognized non-recurring charges against revenues of $2.8 million related to a parking tax matter and a tenant lease termination at 600 West Chicago Avenue. |
33
(4) | We calculate net operating income, or NOI, as shown above. We define NOI as income from our real estate including lease termination fees received from tenants less our property operating expenses, which expenses include property marketing costs. NOI excludes amortization of capitalized tenant improvement costs and leasing commissions. We consider NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because it may help both investors and management to understand the operations of our properties. We use NOI internally to evaluate individual and combined property level performance, and we believe that NOI provides useful information to investors regarding our results of operations because it reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level and may facilitate comparisons of our operating performance between periods and with other REITs. The calculation of NOI excludes certain components of net income in order to provide results that are more closely related to our properties’ results of operations. NOI does not represent cash generated by operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, net income attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders, operating income or cash flow from operating activities, determined in accordance with GAAP, or as an indicator of our financial performance or liquidity, nor is this measure necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. This measure should be considered in conjunction with net income, net income attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders, operating income and cash flow from operating activities as presented in our condensed consolidated statements of operations, condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Other REITs and real estate companies may calculate NOI differently than we do. |
We refer to the 67 properties (132 buildings) we owned continuously from July 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015, as comparable properties. We refer to the sold properties and properties classified as held for sale as other properties. Our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 include the operating results of 67 properties for the entire periods, as we owned these properties as of July 1, 2014.
Rental income. Rental income decreased $48.8 million in the 2015 period, compared to the 2014 period, primarily due to the properties sold in 2015. Our comparable properties were relatively stable in both periods with a slight decrease of 2.1% in rental income at our suburban properties and a 1.0% decrease in rental income at our CBD properties. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we recognized non-recurring charges against revenues of $2.8 million related to a parking tax matter and a tenant lease termination at 600 West Chicago Avenue, one of our CBD properties. Rental income includes increases for non-cash straight line rent adjustments totaling $1.9 million in the 2015 period and $3.2 million in the 2014 period, and net reductions for amortization of acquired real estate leases and assumed real estate lease obligations totaling $2.8 million in the 2015 period and $2.1 million in the 2014 period. Rental income also includes the recognition of lease termination fees totaling $1.8 million in the 2015 period and $1.5 million in the 2014 period.
Tenant reimbursements and other income. Tenant reimbursements and other income decreased $8.6 million in the 2015 period, compared to the 2014 period primarily due to the properties sold in 2015, partially offset by increases of $1.4 million and $0.9 million at our comparable CBD and suburban properties, respectively. The 7.1% increase at the comparable CBD properties resulted from higher real estate tax expense and higher operating expenses and the 10.2% increase at the comparable suburban properties resulted from higher real estate tax expense.
Operating expenses. The $25.8 million decrease in operating expenses during the 2015 period as compared to the 2014 period is due to the properties sold in 2015 and a $0.1 million decrease in operating expenses at the comparable suburban properties, partially offset by a $1.9 million increase at our comparable CBD properties. The 0.8% decrease in operating expenses at the comparable suburban properties primarily relates to decreases in management fees and bad debt expense, partially offset by higher real estate tax expense. The 4.2% increase in operating expenses at the comparable CBD properties primarily relates to increases in real estate tax expense, bad debt expense and utilities, partially offset by decreases in management fees and salaries and benefits.
Depreciation and amortization. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense during the 2015 period as compared to the 2014 period primarily relates to properties sold in 2015.
General and administrative. The decrease in general and administrative expenses primarily relates to $11.5 million of business management and incentive fees paid to our prior external manager in 2014, a $19.1 million decrease related to the shareholder approved reimbursement of expenses incurred by Related/Corvex in connection with their consent solicitation to remove our former Trustees, and a $3.0 million decrease in legal costs, partially offset by $3.7 million of share-based compensation incurred in 2015.
Interest and other income. The increase in interest and other income primarily reflects an increase in interest income due to higher cash balances in the current year.
Interest expense. The decrease in interest expense in the 2015 period primarily reflects the prepayment of $265.0 million of 5.68% mortgage debt secured by 600 West Chicago in August 2014, the prepayment of $125.0 million of our 7.50% unsecured notes in November 2014, the payment of $100.0 million of our term loan in December 2014, the prepayment of $138.8 million of our 5.75% senior unsecured notes due 2015 in May 2015, the transfer of the $40.1 million mortgage debt balance secured by 225 Water Street to the lender in May 2015 and the defeasance of the outstanding $141.4 million balance of the mortgage debt secured by 111 East Wacker Drive, one of the buildings included in Illinois Center, in August 2015.
34
(Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt. The loss on early extinguishment of debt in the 2015 period reflects a $3.9 million loss related to the defeasance of the mortgage loan secured by 111 East Wacker Drive, one of the buildings included in Illinois Center. The gain on early extinguishment of debt in the 2014 period primarily reflects the write-off of unamortized premiums and deferred financing fees related to the prepayment of $265.0 million of 5.68% mortgage debt at 600 West Chicago Avenue in August 2014.
Gain on sale of equity investment. The gain on sale of equity investment in the 2014 period reflects the sale on July 9, 2014 of our entire stake of 22,000,000 common shares of SIR at a per share sales price in excess of our per share carrying value.
Foreign currency exchange loss. The foreign currency exchange loss for the three months ended September 30, 2015 relates to the change in foreign currency rates resulting in losses on cash proceeds from the Australian portfolio disposition maintained in an Australian bank account prior to the transfer of cash from our Australian subsidiary to our U.S bank accounts.
Gain on sale of properties. In the third quarter of 2015, we recorded gains of $26.9 million, $17.6 million and $7.9 million related to the sales of Illinois Center, 185 Asylum Street and 16th and Race Street, respectively. These gains were partially offset by a loss in the third quarter of $12.5 million related to the sale of a portfolio in upstate New York.
Income tax expense. The decrease in income tax expense primarily relates to the foreign tax expense incurred in 2014 related to the Australian assets, which were sold in June 2015.
Equity in earnings of investees. Equity in earnings of investees represents our proportionate share of earnings from SIR during the 2014 period prior to the sale of our entire stake of 22,000,000 common shares of SIR on July 9, 2014.
Income from discontinued operations. In 2015, we adopted ASU 2014-08 and did not classify the properties sold in 2015 as discontinued operations in accordance with this guidance. Income from discontinued operations in the 2014 period relates to 14 properties (43 buildings) sold in 2014.
35
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Comparable Properties Results(1) | Other Properties Results(2) | Consolidated Results | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBD properties(3) | $ | 234,099 | $ | 227,418 | $ | 6,681 | 2.9 | % | $ | 69,587 | $ | 98,737 | $ | 303,686 | $ | 326,155 | $ | (22,469 | ) | (6.9 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
Suburban properties | 100,034 | 105,533 | (5,499 | ) | (5.2 | )% | 53,408 | 86,975 | 153,442 | 192,508 | (39,066 | ) | (20.3 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income | 334,133 | 332,951 | 1,182 | 0.4 | % | 122,995 | 185,712 | 457,128 | 518,663 | (61,535 | ) | (11.9 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenant reimbursements and other income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBD properties | 60,188 | 61,156 | (968 | ) | (1.6 | )% | 20,246 | 25,203 | 80,434 | 86,359 | (5,925 | ) | (6.9 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Suburban properties | 27,191 | 27,274 | (83 | ) | (0.3 | )% | 11,204 | 16,753 | 38,395 | 44,027 | (5,632 | ) | (12.8 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenant reimbursements and other income | 87,379 | 88,430 | (1,051 | ) | (1.2 | )% | 31,450 | 41,956 | 118,829 | 130,386 | (11,557 | ) | (8.9 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBD properties | 130,694 | 131,927 | (1,233 | ) | (0.9 | )% | 50,349 | 63,825 | 181,043 | 195,752 | (14,709 | ) | (7.5 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Suburban properties | 47,144 | 48,858 | (1,714 | ) | (3.5 | )% | 32,941 | 49,214 | 80,085 | 98,072 | (17,987 | ) | (18.3 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 177,838 | 180,785 | (2,947 | ) | (1.6 | )% | 83,290 | 113,039 | 261,128 | 293,824 | (32,696 | ) | (11.1 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income(4): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBD properties | 163,593 | 156,647 | 6,946 | 4.4 | % | 39,484 | 60,115 | 203,077 | 216,762 | (13,685 | ) | (6.3 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suburban properties | 80,081 | 83,949 | (3,868 | ) | (4.6 | )% | 31,671 | 54,514 | 111,752 | 138,463 | (26,711 | ) | (19.3 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income | $ | 243,674 | $ | 240,596 | $ | 3,078 | 1.3 | % | $ | 71,155 | $ | 114,629 | 314,829 | 355,225 | (40,396 | ) | (11.4 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 156,858 | 168,693 | (11,835 | ) | (7.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 43,718 | 96,395 | (52,677 | ) | (54.6 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on asset impairment | 17,162 | 17,922 | (760 | ) | (4.2 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition related costs | — | 5 | (5 | ) | (100.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other expenses | 217,738 | 283,015 | (65,277 | ) | (23.1 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | 97,091 | 72,210 | 24,881 | 34.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income | 4,813 | 1,071 | 3,742 | 349.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (82,926 | ) | (111,079 | ) | 28,153 | (25.3 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on early extinguishment of debt | 6,111 | 6,699 | (588 | ) | (8.8 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of equity investments | — | 171,721 | (171,721 | ) | (100.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on issuance of shares by an equity investee | — | 17,020 | (17,020 | ) | (100.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange loss | (8,953 | ) | — | (8,953 | ) | (100.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of properties | 42,953 | — | 42,953 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of investees | 59,089 | 157,642 | (98,553 | ) | (62.5 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | (2,377 | ) | (2,166 | ) | (211 | ) | 9.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of investees | — | 24,460 | (24,460 | ) | (100.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 56,712 | 179,936 | (123,224 | ) | (68.5 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations | — | 8,220 | (8,220 | ) | (100.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on asset impairment from discontinued operations | — | (2,238 | ) | 2,238 | (100.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt from discontinued operations | — | (3,345 | ) | 3,345 | (100.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 56,712 | 182,573 | (125,861 | ) | (68.9 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred distributions | (20,943 | ) | (25,114 | ) | 4,171 | (16.6 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess fair value of consideration over carrying value of preferred shares | — | (16,205 | ) | 16,205 | (100.0 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income available for Equity Commonwealth common shareholders | $ | 35,769 | $ | 141,254 | $ | (105,485 | ) | (74.7 | )% |
(1) | Comparable properties consist of 67 properties (132 buildings) we owned continuously from January 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015. |
(2) | Other properties consist of properties sold and classified as held for sale. |
36
(3) | During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recognized non-recurring charges against revenues of $2.7 million related to a parking tax matter and a tenant lease termination at 600 West Chicago Avenue. |
(4) | See Note 4 on page 34 for further information regarding NOI. |
We refer to the 67 properties (132 buildings) we owned continuously from January 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015, as comparable properties. We refer to the sold properties and properties classified as held for sale as other properties. Our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 includes the operating results of 67 properties for the entire periods, as we owned these properties as of January 1, 2014.
Rental income. Rental income decreased $61.5 million in the 2015 period, compared to the 2014 period, primarily due to the properties sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Our comparable suburban properties decreased $5.5 million primarily due to leasing activity at a particular building where one tenant vacated its space and two tenants shortened their remaining lease terms. In connection with these leasing transactions, the corresponding deferred rent receivable balances were written off or amortized over the shorter term. The decrease in rental income was offset by a $6.7 million increase at our CBD properties primarily due to the write offs in 2014 of an acquired real estate lease after a tenant vacated its space prior to the lease expiration and of a deferred rent receivable after a tenant contracted its lease space. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recognized non-recurring charges against revenues of $2.7 million related to a parking tax matter and a tenant lease termination at 600 West Chicago Avenue, one of our CBD properties. Rental income includes increases for non-cash straight line rent adjustments totaling $3.6 million in the 2015 period and $10.2 million in the 2014 period, and net reductions for amortization of acquired real estate leases and assumed real estate lease obligations totaling $6.0 million in the 2015 period and $8.5 million in the 2014 period. Rental income also includes the recognition of lease termination fees totaling $7.9 million in the 2015 period and $3.3 million in the 2014 period.
Tenant reimbursements and other income. Tenant reimbursements and other income decreased $11.6 million in the 2015 period, compared to the 2014 period primarily due to the properties sold in 2015 and a $1.0 million decrease at our comparable CBD properties resulting from lower real estate tax expense and lower operating expenses.
Operating expenses. The $32.7 million decrease in operating expenses during the 2015 period as compared to the 2014 period is primarily due to the properties sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, a decrease at our comparable CBD properties of $1.2 million and a decrease at our comparable suburban properties of $1.7 million. The decrease in operating expenses primarily reflects reduced real estate tax expense at our CBD properties and decreases in management fees and salaries and benefits at both our CBD and suburban properties, partially offset by increases in bad debt expense at the CBD properties, increases in real estate tax expense at our suburban properties and increases in property related legal fees at both our CBD and suburban properties.
Depreciation and amortization. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense in the 2015 period when compared to the 2014 period primarily relates to properties sold in 2015 and a decrease in amortization due to the write off of an acquired real estate lease balance in 2014 after a tenant vacated its space prior to the lease expiration. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization expense resulting from the leasing transactions discussed above, where due to one tenant vacating its space and two other tenants shortening their remaining lease term, the corresponding tenant improvements were written off or depreciation was accelerated.
General and administrative. The decrease in general and administrative expenses primarily relates to $44.1 million of business management and incentive fees paid to our prior external manager in 2014, a $16.9 million decrease related to the shareholder approved reimbursement of expenses incurred by Related/Corvex in connection with their consent solicitation to remove our former Trustees, and an $8.8 million decrease in legal and litigation costs, partially offset by $2.6 million of expenses related to the termination and cooperation agreement with RMR and the internalization of our management, which includes an $8.4 million increase in share-based compensation.
Loss on asset impairment. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recorded an impairment charge of $17.2 million related to 12655 Olive Boulevard, 1285 Fern Ridge Parkway and portfolios of properties located in Georgia and New York, based upon updated market information in accordance with our impairment analysis procedures. The impairment charge in 2014 includes $22.7 million related to 225 Water Street where we made the decision to cease making loan servicing payments, partially offset by the reversal of previously recorded impairment losses totaling $4.8 million for properties that were reclassified to continuing operations, which includes the elimination of estimated costs to sell.
Interest and other income. The increase in interest and other income primarily relates to a $3.1 million gain on the sale of securities in the first quarter of 2015.
Interest expense. The decrease in interest expense in the 2015 period primarily reflects the payment of the $235.0 million balance on our revolving credit facility in July 2014, the prepayment of $265.0 million of 5.68% mortgage debt in August 2014, the
37
prepayment of $33.4 million of our 6.40% unsecured notes in September 2014, the prepayment of $125.0 million of our 7.50% unsecured notes in November 2014 the payment of $100.0 million of our term loan in December 2014, the prepayment of $138.8 million of our 5.75% senior unsecured notes due 2015 in May 2015 and the defeasance of the outstanding balance of the mortgage debt secured by 111 East Wacker Drive, one of the buildings included in Illinois Center, in August 2015.
Gain on early extinguishment of debt. The gain on early extinguishment of debt in the 2015 period reflects a $17.3 million gain related to the 225 Water Street foreclosure, partially offset by a $6.2 million loss related to the defeasance of the mortgage loan secured by 1320 Main Street, a $3.9 million loss related to the defeasance of the mortgage loan secured by 111 East Wacker Drive, a $0.6 million loss related to the prepayment of mortgage debt at 2501 20th Place South, a $0.1 million loss related to the redemption of $138.8 million of our 5.75% senior notes and a $0.4 million loss related to the new credit agreement entered into in January 2015, which resulted in the termination of our prior credit agreement. The gain on early extinguishment of debt in the 2014 period primarily reflects the write-off of unamortized premiums and deferred financing fees related to the prepayment of $265.0 million of 5.68% mortgage debt at 600 West Chicago Avenue in August 2014.
Gain on sale of equity investments. The gain on sale of equity investments in the 2014 period reflects the sale on July 9, 2014 of our entire stake of 22,000,000 common shares of SIR at a per share sales price in excess of our per share carrying value, partially offset by a loss on the sale of our investment in AIC in May 2014.
Gain on issuance of shares by an equity investee. The gain on issuance of shares by an equity investee primarily reflects the issuance of 10,000,000 common shares by SIR during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 at prices above our per share carrying value.
Foreign currency exchange loss. The foreign currency exchange loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 relates to the change in foreign currency rates resulting in losses on cash proceeds from the Australian portfolio disposition maintained in an Australian bank account prior to the transfer of cash from our Australian subsidiary to our U.S bank accounts.
Gain on sale of properties. In the first quarter of 2015, we sold two suburban properties (three buildings) and recorded a $5.9 million gain on sale of properties. In the second quarter of 2015, we recorded gains of $41.6 million and $11.9 million related to the sales of an office portfolio in AL, LA, NC, SC and Sorrento Valley Business Park, respectively. In the third quarter of 2015, we recorded gains of $26.9 million, $17.6 million and $7.9 million related to the sales of Illinois Center, 185 Asylum Street and 16th and Race Street, respectively. These gains were partially offset by a loss in the second quarter on the sale of properties in Australia of $47.9 million, which is net of the write off of approximately $63.2 million of foreign currency translation adjustments previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss. We also recognized losses in the second quarter of $8.1 million and $2.3 million related to sales of a portfolio of small office and industrial properties and two properties in St. Louis, respectively and a loss in the third quarter of $12.5 million related to the sale of a portfolio in upstate New York.
Income tax expense. The increase in income tax expense relates to a federal income tax expense in the second quarter of 2015 incurred as a result of a taxable built-in gain triggered by the sale of a property that was previously owned by a C corporation. The increase in the federal tax expense was partially offset by a decrease in foreign tax expense related to the Australian assets, which were sold in June 2015.
Equity in earnings of investees. Equity in earnings of investees represents our proportionate share of earnings from SIR during the 2014 period prior to the sale of our entire stake of 22,000,000 common shares of SIR on July 9, 2014 and our proportionate share of earnings from AIC during the 2014 period prior to the sale of our investment in AIC on May 9, 2014.
Income from discontinued operations. In 2015, we adopted ASU 2014-08 and did not classify the properties sold in 2015 as discontinued operations in accordance with this guidance. Income from discontinued operations in the 2014 period relates to 14 properties (43 buildings) sold in 2014.
Loss on asset impairment from discontinued operations. The 2014 loss on asset impairment reflects the write down to estimated fair value less costs to sell for 14 properties (43 buildings) sold during 2014.
Loss on early extinguishment of debt from discontinued operations. The 2014 loss on early extinguishment of debt reflects prepayment premiums and the write off of unamortized discounts and deferred financing fees associated with the repayment of $11.2 million of 6.14% mortgage debt and $8.5 million of 5.78% mortgage debt in June 2014.
Preferred distributions. The decrease in preferred distributions reflects the conversion of 10,264,503 of our series D preferred shares into 10,412,499 of our common shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
38
Excess fair value of consideration over carrying value of preferred shares. As a result of the conversion of our series D preferred shares in May 2014, we recorded a preferred distribution of $16.2 million for the excess of the market value of the common shares issued above the carrying value of the series D preferred shares converted.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our Operating Liquidity and Resources
As of September 30, 2015, we had $1.6 billion of cash and cash equivalents. We expect to use our cash balances, cash flow from our operations and proceeds of future property sales to fund our operations, repay debt, make distributions, acquire assets, fund tenant improvements and leasing costs and for other general business purposes. We believe our cash balances and the cash flow from our operations will be sufficient to fund our ordinary course activities.
Our future cash flows from operating activities will depend primarily upon our:
• | ability to maintain or improve the occupancy of, and the rental rates at, our properties; |
• | ability to control operating and financing cost increases at our properties; and |
• | ability to purchase additional properties which produce rents, less property operating expenses, in excess of our costs of acquisition capital. |
Volatility in energy costs and real estate taxes may cause our future operating costs to fluctuate; however, the impact of these fluctuations is expected to be largely offset by the pass through of operating costs to our tenants pursuant to lease terms, although there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully offset these costs or that doing so would not negatively impact our competitive position or business.
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities were $141.4 million, $1,411.7 million and $(258.9) million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, and $160.7 million, $814.5 million and $(605.9) million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Changes in these three categories of our cash flows between 2015 and 2014 are primarily related to real estate improvements, our dispositions of properties, the sale of our SIR common shares during the 2014 period, our purchase of our common shares during the 2015 period, our repayments of debt, and our distributions to our common shareholders during the 2014 period.
Our Investment and Financing Liquidity and Resources
In order to maintain financial flexibility, to fund acquisitions and to meet cash needs that may result from timing differences between our receipt of rents and our desire or need to make distributions and investments or pay operating or capital expenses, we maintain an unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of institutional lenders. On January 29, 2015, we entered into a new credit agreement, pursuant to which the lenders agreed to provide (i) a $750.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, (ii) a $200.0 million 5-year term loan facility and (iii) a $200.0 million 7-year term loan facility. The new agreement replaced our prior credit agreement, dated as of August 9, 2010, and our prior term loan agreement, dated as of December 16, 2010. The revolving credit facility has a scheduled maturity date of January 28, 2019, which maturity date may be extended for up to two additional periods of six months at our option subject to satisfaction of certain conditions and the payment of an extension fee of 0.075% of the aggregate amount available under the revolving credit facility. The 5-year term loan and the 7-year term loan have scheduled maturity dates of January 28, 2020 and January 28, 2022, respectively. We used the proceeds of borrowings under the credit agreement to repay all amounts outstanding and due under the previous term loan agreement.
Borrowings under our revolving credit facility currently bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread, which was 125 basis points as of September 30, 2015. We also pay a facility fee of 25 basis points per annum on the total amount of lending commitments under our revolving credit facility. Both the interest rate spread and the facility fee are subject to adjustment based upon changes to our credit ratings. We are allowed to borrow, repay and reborrow funds available under our revolving credit facility until maturity, and no principal repayment is due until maturity. As of September 30, 2015, the interest rate payable on borrowings under our revolving credit facility was 1.44%. As of September 30, 2015, we had no balance outstanding under our revolving credit facility.
Our term loans currently bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread, which was 140 and 180 basis points for the 5-year and 7-year term loan, respectively, as of September 30, 2015. The interest rate spread is subject to adjustment based upon changes to our credit ratings. As of September 30, 2015, the interest rate for the amounts outstanding under our term loan was
39
1.59% and 1.99% for the 5-year and 7-year term loan, respectively. As of September 30, 2015, our 5-year and 7-year term loans each had balances of $200.0 million.
On August 3, 2015, we defeased the outstanding $141.4 million balance of the mortgage loan secured by 111 East Wacker Drive, one of the buildings included in Illinois Center. On June 5, 2015, we prepaid $10.0 million of 7.36% mortgage debt at 2501 20th Place South. On June 3, 2015, we defeased the $38.7 million outstanding balance of the mortgage loan secured by 1320 Main Street. On May 22, 2015, title to 225 Water Street was transferred to the lender pursuant to the consensual foreclosure in full satisfaction of the mortgage debt, with a principal balance of $40.1 million. On May 1, 2015, we redeemed at par $138.8 million of our 5.75% senior unsecured notes due 2015.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we paid an aggregate of $20.9 million of distributions on our series D and series E preferred shares. On October 9, 2015, we announced that our Board of Trustees declared dividends of $0.40625 per series D preferred share and $0.453125 per series E preferred share, both of which are expected to be paid on November 16, 2015 to shareholders of record on November 2, 2015.
On August 24, 2015, our Board of Trustees approved a common share repurchase plan, which authorizes the repurchase of up to $100.0 million of our outstanding common shares over the twelve month period following the date of authorization. On September 14, 2015, our Board of Trustees authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $100.0 million of our outstanding common shares over the twelve month period following the date of authorization. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, we purchased and retired 3,410,300 of our common shares at a weighted average price of $25.76 per share.
Our outstanding debt maturities and weighted average interest rates as of September 30, 2015, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Scheduled Principal Payments During Period | ||||||||||||||||||
Year | Unsecured Floating Rate Debt | Unsecured Fixed Rate Debt | Secured Fixed Rate Debt | Total(1) | Weighted Average Interest Rate(2) | |||||||||||||
2015 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 802 | $ | 802 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||
2016 | — | 139,104 | 119,347 | 258,451 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||
2017 | — | 250,000 | 44,865 | 294,865 | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||
2018 | — | 250,000 | 3,847 | 253,847 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||
2019 | — | — | 164,613 | (3) | 164,613 | 5.7 | % | |||||||||||
2020 | 200,000 | 250,000 | 1,674 | 451,674 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||||||
2021 | — | — | 25,982 | 25,982 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||
2022 | 200,000 | — | 799 | 200,799 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||
2023 | — | — | 702 | 702 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||
2024 | — | — | 743 | 743 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Thereafter | — | 175,000 | 991 | 175,991 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||
$ | 400,000 | $ | 1,064,104 | $ | 364,365 | $ | 1,828,469 | 5.1 | % |
(1) | Total debt outstanding as of September 30, 2015, including net unamortized premiums and discounts, equals $1,828,073. |
(2) | Weighted based on current contractual interest rates. |
(3) | We have a mortgage loan with an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of September 30, 2015 of $170,097 secured by 1735 Market Street that matures in 2019. Interest on this loan is payable at a rate equal to a spread over LIBOR, but the interest rate has been fixed by a cash flow hedge which sets the rate at approximately 5.66% per year until December 1, 2016. |
For a description of our financing activities since January 1, 2015, see “Financing Activities” above. Also, for further information about our indebtedness, see Note 8 to the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.
When significant amounts are outstanding under our revolving credit facility, or as the maturity dates of our revolving credit facility and term debts approach, we explore alternatives for the repayment of amounts due. Such alternatives may include incurring additional debt and issuing new equity securities, extending the maturity of our revolving credit facility and
40
entering into a new revolving credit facility. We have an effective shelf registration statement that allows us to issue public securities on an expedited basis, but it does not assure that there will be buyers for such securities.
We believe that we will have access to various types of financings, including debt or equity offerings, to fund our future acquisitions and to pay our debts and other obligations as they become due. The completion and the costs of our future debt transactions will depend primarily upon market conditions and our credit ratings. We have no control over market conditions. Our credit ratings depend upon evaluations by credit rating agencies of our business practices and plans and, in particular, whether we appear to have the ability to maintain our earnings, to space our debt maturities and to balance our use of debt and equity capital so that our financial performance and leverage ratios afford us flexibility to withstand any reasonably foreseeable adverse changes. We intend to conduct our business activities in a manner which will continue to afford us reasonable access to capital for investment and financing activities. However, there can be no assurance regarding our credit ratings or our ability to complete any debt or equity offerings or that our cost of any future public or private financings will not increase.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we sold 81 properties (116 buildings) and one land parcel with a combined 16,049,648 square feet for an aggregate sales price of $1.7 billion, excluding closing costs. In October 2015, we sold seven properties (13 buildings), with 1,263,809 square feet for $131.2 million in a series of transactions. For more information regarding these transactions, see Note 4 to the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, amounts capitalized at our properties, including properties sold and properties classified in discontinued operations, for tenant improvements, leasing costs, building improvements and development and redevelopment activities were as follows (amounts in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Tenant improvements(1) | $ | 13,497 | $ | 10,719 | $ | 33,398 | $ | 42,249 | |||||||
Leasing costs(2) | 14,166 | 15,838 | 34,732 | 26,574 | |||||||||||
Building improvements(3) | 4,975 | 5,897 | 12,661 | 14,800 | |||||||||||
Development, redevelopment and other activities(4) | 352 | 2,273 | 591 | 8,820 |
(1) | Tenant improvements include capital expenditures to improve tenants’ space. |
(2) | Leasing costs include leasing related costs such as brokerage commissions and tenant inducements. |
(3) | Building improvements generally include expenditures to replace obsolete building components and expenditures that extend the useful life of existing assets. Tenant-funded capital expenditures are excluded. |
(4) | Development, redevelopment and other activities generally include (i) major capital expenditures that are identified at the time of a property acquisition and incurred within a short time period after acquiring the property, and (ii) major capital expenditure projects that reposition a property or result in new sources of revenue. |
During the three months ended September 30, 2015, commitments made for expenditures in connection with leasing space at our properties, such as tenant improvements and leasing commissions, excluding properties sold, were as follows (dollar and square foot measures in thousands, except per square foot measures):
New Leases | Renewals | Total | |||||||||
Rentable square feet leased during the period | 429 | 955 | 1,384 | ||||||||
Tenant leasing costs and concession commitments (1) | $ | 26,049 | $ | 28,402 | $ | 54,451 | |||||
Tenant leasing costs and concession commitments per rentable square foot (1) | $ | 60.72 | $ | 29.74 | $ | 39.35 | |||||
Weighted average lease term by square foot (years) | 9.2 | 5.0 | 6.3 | ||||||||
Total leasing costs and concession commitments per rentable square foot per year (1) | $ | 6.62 | $ | 5.89 | $ | 6.22 |
(1) | Includes commitments made for leasing expenditures and concessions, such as tenant improvements and leasing commissions. |
41
Debt Covenants
Our unsecured debt obligations at September 30, 2015 were our term loans and our publicly issued senior unsecured notes. Our public debt indenture and related supplements, our revolving credit facility and our term loan agreement contain a number of financial ratio covenants which generally restrict our ability to incur debts, in excess of calculated amounts, restrict our ability to make distributions under certain circumstances and require us to maintain other financial ratios. At September 30, 2015, we believe we were in compliance with all covenants under our indenture and related supplements, and we believe we were in compliance with all respective covenants under our revolving credit facility and our term loan agreement. In addition to our unsecured debt obligations, we had $367.7 million (including net unamortized premiums and discounts) of mortgage notes outstanding at September 30, 2015.
None of our indenture and related supplements, our revolving credit facility and term loan agreement, or our mortgage notes contain provisions for acceleration or require us to provide collateral security which could be triggered by our debt ratings. However, our senior debt rating is used to determine the interest rate and the fees payable under our revolving credit facility and our term loan agreement.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of September 30, 2015, we had no off balance sheet arrangements that have had or that we expect would be reasonably likely to have a future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. We had no swaps or hedges as of September 30, 2015, other than the cash flow hedge associated with our $170.1 million of mortgage debt described in Note 12 to the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements, under “Our Investment and Financing Liquidity and Resources” above in Part I, Item 2 and under “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” included in Part I, Item 3 of this Quarterly Report.
Funds from Operations (FFO) and Normalized FFO
We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). NAREIT defines FFO as net income (loss), calculated in accordance with GAAP, excluding real estate depreciation and amortization, gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable property, impairment of depreciable real estate, and our portion of these items related to equity investees and noncontrolling interests. Our calculation of Normalized FFO differs from NAREIT’s definition of FFO because we exclude certain items that we view as nonrecurring or impacting comparability from period to period. We consider FFO and Normalized FFO to be appropriate measures of operating performance for a REIT, along with net income, net income attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders, operating income and cash flow from operating activities.
We believe that FFO and Normalized FFO provide useful information to investors because by excluding the effects of certain historical amounts, such as depreciation expense, FFO and Normalized FFO may facilitate a comparison of our operating performance between periods and with other REITs. FFO and Normalized FFO are among the factors considered by our Board of Trustees when determining the amount of distributions to our shareholders. FFO and Normalized FFO do not represent cash generated by operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income, net income attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders, operating income or cash flow from operating activities, determined in accordance with GAAP, or as indicators of our financial performance or liquidity, nor are these measures necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. These measures should be considered in conjunction with net income, net income attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders, operating income and cash flow from operating activities as presented in our condensed consolidated statements of operations, condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Other REITs and real estate companies may calculate FFO and Normalized FFO differently than we do.
42
The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to FFO attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders and a calculation to Normalized FFO attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Reconciliation to FFO: | |||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 30,466 | $ | 156,740 | $ | 56,712 | $ | 182,573 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 40,522 | 57,213 | 156,858 | 168,693 | |||||||||||
Loss on asset impairment from continuing operations | — | — | 17,162 | 17,922 | |||||||||||
(Gain) loss on asset impairment from discontinued operations | — | (122 | ) | — | 2,238 | ||||||||||
FFO from equity investees | — | 1,456 | — | 33,007 | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of properties | (39,793 | ) | — | (42,953 | ) | — | |||||||||
Equity in earnings of investees | — | (1,072 | ) | — | (24,460 | ) | |||||||||
FFO attributable to Equity Commonwealth | 31,195 | 214,215 | 187,779 | 379,973 | |||||||||||
Preferred distributions | (6,981 | ) | (6,981 | ) | (20,943 | ) | (25,114 | ) | |||||||
FFO attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders | $ | 24,214 | $ | 207,234 | $ | 166,836 | $ | 354,859 | |||||||
Reconciliation to Normalized FFO: | |||||||||||||||
FFO available for Equity Commonwealth common shareholders | $ | 24,214 | $ | 207,234 | $ | 166,836 | $ | 354,859 | |||||||
Recurring adjustments: | |||||||||||||||
Lease value amortization | 2,766 | 2,099 | 6,033 | 8,517 | |||||||||||
Straight line rent from continuing operations | (1,901 | ) | (3,197 | ) | (3,584 | ) | (10,172 | ) | |||||||
Straight line rent from discontinued operations | — | — | — | (226 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt from continuing operations | 3,887 | (6,699 | ) | (6,111 | ) | (6,699 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt from discontinued operations | — | — | — | 3,345 | |||||||||||
Minimum cash rent from direct financing lease | 2,032 | 2,032 | 6,096 | 6,096 | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of equity investment | — | (171,754 | ) | — | (171,721 | ) | |||||||||
Gain on issuance of shares by an equity investee | — | — | — | (17,020 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest earned from direct financing lease | (96 | ) | (186 | ) | (356 | ) | (623 | ) | |||||||
Normalized FFO from equity investees, net of FFO | — | — | — | (3,353 | ) | ||||||||||
Other items which affect comparability: | |||||||||||||||
Shareholder litigation costs and transition-related expenses | 5,474 | 27,777 | 8,731 | 36,582 | |||||||||||
Transition services fee | 198 | — | 2,613 | — | |||||||||||
Acquisition related costs | — | — | — | 5 | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of securities | — | — | (3,080 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange loss | 9,809 | — | 8,953 | — | |||||||||||
Normalized FFO attributable to Equity Commonwealth common shareholders | $ | 46,383 | $ | 57,306 | $ | 186,131 | $ | 199,590 |
Related Person Transactions
We have engaged in certain related person transactions during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, both prior to and following our Special Meeting at which our new Board of Trustees was elected.
Following the Special Meeting, we entered into transactions with certain of our existing Trustees and executive officers and shareholders owning 5% or more of our common shares, or with persons or entities associated with such persons. We entered into a one-year license agreement for office space with an entity associated with Mr. Zell, our Chairman, and Mr. Helfand, our President and Chief Executive Officer for approximately $0.2 million for the year. On May 4, 2015 and
43
November 2, 2015, the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees approved an agreement to extend the term of the license agreement through November 30, 2015 and January 31, 2016, respectively. The license fee payment is approximately $0.1 million for the extended term. We entered into a one-year lease with one three-month renewal option for office space with an entity associated with Mr. Zell for approximately $0.2 million for the initial term, which lease was terminated, effective January 31, 2015. We also entered into a sublease agreement for office space, the landlord of which is an entity associated with Mr. Zell, for approximately $0.2 million for the initial term of approximately seven months. On May 4, 2015 and November 2, 2015, the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees approved an agreement to extend the term of the sublease through November 30, 2015 and January 31, 2016, respectively. The sublease payment is approximately $0.2 million for the extended term. In 2015, we entered into a lease for office space with an entity associated with Mr. Zell, our Chairman, for approximately $0.5 million for the initial year beginning in 2016, and $0.8 million annually thereafter. We believe that the foregoing transactions with our existing Trustees and executive officers are on market terms.
At the Special Meeting our shareholders voted to approve the reimbursement of approximately $33.5 million of expenses incurred by Related Fund Management, LLC and Corvex Management LP, which we refer to together as Related/Corvex, since February 2013 in connection with their consent solicitations to remove our former Trustees and elect the new Board of Trustees and to engage in related litigation. At the time the reimbursement was approved, Related/Corvex, according to them, owned approximately 5.7% in the aggregate of our common shares. Approximately $16.7 million was paid and expensed during the year ended December 31, 2014. Approximately $8.4 million was to be reimbursed only if the average closing price of our common shares was at least $26.00 (as adjusted for any share splits or share dividends) during the one year period after the date on which the reimbursement was approved by shareholders, and the remaining approximately $8.4 million will be reimbursed only if the average closing price of our common shares is at least $26.00 (as adjusted for any share splits or share dividends) during the one year period between the first and second anniversaries of the date on which the reimbursement was approved by shareholders. The average closing price of our common shares was at least $26.00 during the first one year period after the date on which the reimbursement was approved by shareholders, and in August 2015 we paid $8.4 million to Related/Corvex. As these future potential payments represent a “derivative liability”, we expensed approximately $6.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The fair value of this derivative liability on September 30, 2015 was $5.2 million. The total expense of $6.9 million incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, is included in general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Prior to the election of our new Board of Trustees at the Special Meeting and the appointment of our current executive officers following the Special Meeting on July 31, 2014, we had historical transactions with certain of our former Trustees, former executive officers, RMR, SIR, AIC and other companies to which RMR provides management services and others affiliated with them. Certain of these transactions continued or have continued following the Special Meeting.
Effective September 30, 2014, we terminated our business and property management relationships with RMR for our U.S. properties pursuant to a termination and cooperation agreement, which we refer to as the Cooperation Agreement. Pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement, through February 28, 2015, RMR and RMR Australia, which we refer to together as Manager, agreed to use best efforts to assist us in the transition of our management and operations. We paid Manager $1.2 million per month for transition services from October 1, 2014 to February 28, 2015, which included continued management and other services for the Australian assets pursuant to an existing management agreement, or the Australia Management Agreement. Beginning March 1, 2015, we agreed to pay Manager $0.1 million per month until we no longer required such services or until the Australia Management Agreement was terminated, which was terminated in the third quarter of 2015, effective October 31, 2015. The $2.6 million incurred pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 is included in general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated financial statements and is net of certain amounts due from RMR. There is no future obligation to pay any fees to Manager.
For further information about these and other such relationships and related person transactions, see Note 17 to the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. In addition, for more information about these transactions and relationships and about the risks that may arise as a result of these and other related person transactions and relationships, please see elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, including "Forward Looking Statements." Our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report and our Information Statements, are available at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Copies of certain of our agreements with these related parties, including our business management agreements and property management agreements with RMR and RMR Australia, various agreements we have entered into with SIR and the shareholders agreement with AIC and its shareholders, are publicly available as exhibits to our public filings with the SEC and accessible at the SEC’s website.
44
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are exposed to risks associated with market changes in interest rates and foreign-exchange related variability on our investments in Australia.
Interest Rate Risk
We manage our exposure to interest rate risk by monitoring available financing alternatives. Other than as described below, we do not currently foresee any significant changes in our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates or in how we manage this exposure in the near future.
At September 30, 2015, our outstanding fixed rate debt consisted of the following senior unsecured notes and secured mortgage notes (dollars in thousands):
Senior Unsecured Notes:
Debt | Principal Balance(1) | Annual Interest Rate(1) | Annual Interest Expense(1) | Maturity | Interest Payment Due | ||||||||||
6.250% senior unsecured notes due 2016 | $ | 139,104 | 6.25 | % | $ | 8,694 | 8/15/2016 | Semi-Annually | |||||||
6.250% senior unsecured notes due 2017 | 250,000 | 6.25 | % | 15,625 | 6/15/2017 | Semi-Annually | |||||||||
6.650% senior unsecured notes due 2018 | 250,000 | 6.65 | % | 16,625 | 1/15/2018 | Semi-Annually | |||||||||
5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2020 | 250,000 | 5.88 | % | 14,688 | 9/15/2020 | Semi-Annually | |||||||||
5.750% senior unsecured notes due 2042 | 175,000 | 5.75 | % | 10,063 | 8/1/2042 | Quarterly | |||||||||
$ | 1,064,104 | $ | 65,695 |
(1) | The principal balance, annual interest rate and annual interest expense are the amounts stated in the applicable contracts. In accordance with GAAP, our carrying values and recorded interest expense may differ from these amounts because of market conditions and issuance costs at the time we issued these debts. For more information, see Note 8 to the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item I of this Quarterly Report. |
No principal repayments are due under our senior unsecured notes until maturity.
Secured Mortgage Notes:
Debt | Principal Balance(1) | Annual Interest Rate(1) | Annual Interest Expense(1) | Maturity | Interest Payment Due | ||||||||||
111 Monument Circle | $ | 116,000 | 5.24 | % | $ | 6,140 | 3/1/2016 | Monthly | |||||||
Parkshore Plaza | 41,275 | 5.67 | % | 2,373 | 5/1/2017 | Monthly | |||||||||
1735 Market Place | 170,097 | 5.66 | % | (2) | 9,650 | 12/2/2019 | Monthly | ||||||||
206 East 9th Street | 27,631 | 5.69 | % | 1,601 | 1/5/2021 | Monthly | |||||||||
33 Stiles Lane | 2,874 | 6.75 | % | 201 | 3/1/2022 | Monthly | |||||||||
97 Newberry Road | 6,488 | 5.71 | % | 378 | 3/1/2026 | Monthly | |||||||||
$ | 364,365 | $ | 20,343 |
(1) | The principal balance, annual interest rate and annual interest expense are the amounts stated in the applicable contracts. In accordance with GAAP, our carrying values and recorded interest expense may differ from these amounts because of market conditions and issuance costs at the time we assumed or issued these debts. For more information, see Note 8 to the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item I of this Quarterly Report. |
(2) | Interest on this loan is payable at a rate equal to a spread over LIBOR, but the interest rate has been fixed by a cash flow hedge which sets the rate at approximately 5.66% until December 1, 2016. The floating interest rate at September 30, 2015 was 2.80%. |
45
Some of our secured notes require principal and interest payments through maturity pursuant to amortization schedules, and some of our secured notes require interest only payments through maturity.
Swap Agreements
We have interest rate swap agreements to manage our interest rate risk exposure on $170.1 million of mortgage notes due 2019, which require us to pay interest at a rate equal to a spread over LIBOR. The interest rate swap agreements utilized by us effectively modify our exposure to interest rate risk arising from this floating rate mortgage loan by converting this floating rate debt to a fixed rate through December 1, 2016, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. These agreements involve the receipt of floating rate amounts in exchange for fixed rate interest payments over the life of the agreements. Approximately 9.3% ($170.1 million) of our total outstanding debt had interest payments designated as hedged transactions to interest rate swap agreements at September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the fair value of our derivative instruments included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and cumulative other comprehensive loss in our condensed consolidated balance sheet totaled $5.1 million.
Fixed Rate Debt
Because our fixed rate unsecured and secured notes bear interest at fixed rates, changes in market interest rates during the term of these debts will not affect our interest obligations. If all of these notes were refinanced at interest rates which are 100 basis points higher or lower than shown above, our per annum interest cost would increase or decrease, respectively, by approximately $14.3 million.
Each of our fixed rate unsecured debt arrangements and some of our secured debt arrangements allow us to make repayments earlier than the stated maturity date. In some cases, we are not allowed to make early repayment prior to a cutoff date, and we are generally allowed to make prepayments only at a premium equal to a make whole amount, as defined, which is generally designed to preserve a stated yield to the note holder. Also, we have repurchased and retired some of our outstanding debts and we may do so again in the future. These prepayment rights and our ability to repurchase and retire outstanding debt may afford us opportunities to mitigate the risk of refinancing our debts at maturity at higher rates by refinancing prior to maturity.
Floating Rate Debt
At September 30, 2015, our unhedged floating rate debt consisted of our term loans. Our $200.0 million 5-year term loan matures in January 2020 and our $200.0 million 7-year term loan matures in January 2022. Borrowings under our revolving credit facility and term loan are in U.S. dollars and bear interest at LIBOR plus spreads that are subject to adjustment based upon changes to our credit ratings. Accordingly, we are vulnerable to changes in U.S. dollar based short term rates, specifically LIBOR. In addition, upon renewal or refinancing of our revolving credit facility or term loan, we are vulnerable to increases in interest rate premiums due to market conditions or our perceived credit risk. Generally, a change in market interest rates would not affect the value of these floating rate debts, but would affect our operating results. The following table presents the impact a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would have on our floating rate interest expense as of September 30, 2015 (dollars in thousands):
Impact of Changes in Interest Rates | ||||||||||
Total Interest | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Per Year(1) | Outstanding Debt | Expense Per Year | ||||||||
Term loans at September 30, 2015 | 1.59%/1.99% | $ | 400,000 | $ | 7,172 | |||||
100 basis point increase | 2.59%/2.99% | $ | 400,000 | $ | 11,172 |
(1) | Based on the interest rates and outstanding borrowings of our floating rate debt as of September 30, 2015. |
Foreign Currency Risk
There's a risk that our financial results will be affected by changes in currency exchange rates. As a result of the sale of our Australian portfolio, our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange rates relates to the translation of the cash and cash equivalent balance at our Australian subsidiary from Australian dollars into U.S. dollars. At September 30, 2015, the
46
Australia dollar cash and cash equivalents balance was $3.7 million in U.S. dollars, or approximately less than 0.1% of our total assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.
In July 2015, we transferred approximately $218.0 million in U.S. dollars from our Australian subsidiary to our U.S. bank accounts. As a result of the change in foreign exchange rates on our cash maintained in an Australian bank account prior to the transfer of cash to a U.S. bank account, we recognized foreign currency exchange losses of approximately $9.8 million in our third quarter 2015 consolidated financial statements. In October 2015, we transferred approximately $3.4 million in U.S. dollars from our Australian subsidiary to our U.S. bank accounts and expect to recognize foreign currency exchange gains of approximately $0.1 million in our annual 2015 consolidated financial statements. As of October 31, 2015, we no longer have any cash maintained in Australian bank accounts.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based upon that evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
47
PART II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Special Litigation Committee
On June 5, 2014, our Board of Trustees resolved to form a special litigation committee, or an SLC, to investigate all of the claims alleged in the judicial and arbitral actions purportedly brought by or on behalf of EQC shareholders against EQC’s former officers and former Trustees and related persons and entities discussed below, or the Shareholder Actions. The members of the SLC are Sam Zell, David Helfand and Peter Linneman. The SLC was delegated full authority to investigate, review and analyze the facts and circumstances that are the subject of the Shareholder Actions, as well as any additional facts and circumstances that may be at issue in any related inquiry, investigation or proceeding. The SLC was also empowered to consider and determine whether or not prosecution of the claims asserted in the Shareholder Actions, or any other claims related to the facts and circumstances of the Shareholder Actions, is in the best interests of EQC and our shareholders, and to further consider and determine what action should be taken on behalf of EQC with respect to the Shareholder Actions and any related inquiry, investigation or proceeding.
The SLC, with the assistance of counsel, reviewed approximately 300,000 pages of documents and conducted numerous in-person interviews, including interviews of each living defendant in the Shareholder Actions, officers of RMR, and the lead underwriter on the equity offering that the Company completed in 2013, or the Equity Offering. The SLC concluded that, given the cost of pursuing the claims in the Shareholder Actions, the low likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood that the Company will be required to indemnify the former officers and former Trustees for any damages, it is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to dismiss the lawsuits. On November 6, 2014, the SLC finalized its report, which details the SLC’s investigation, analysis and conclusions. Based on the SLC’s determination, we moved to dismiss those Shareholder Actions that remained pending at the time the SLC’s report was finalized. We have since entered into settlement agreements with the plaintiffs in all of those actions, all of which have been dismissed with prejudice as to each plaintiff, for an aggregate payment of $525,000.
Delaware County Employees Retirement Fund v. Portnoy I
On February 28, 2013, Delaware County Employees Retirement Fund, or Del-Co, a purported shareholder of EQC, filed a complaint in the Federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The case is titled Delaware County Employees Retirement Fund v. Portnoy, Civ. No. 1:13-cv-10405-DJC, or the First Del-Co Action. The complaint in the First Del-Co Action purported to bring claims individually and derivatively on behalf of the nominal defendant, EQC, against RMR and certain of our former officers and former Trustees. The complaint in the First Del-Co Action asserted claims against the defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and abuse of control. Del-Co sought declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as compensatory and rescissory damages, including counsel fees and expenses.
On March 1, 2013, Del-Co filed a motion requesting that the court, among other things, issue a temporary restraining order, or TRO, enjoining EQC and our former Trustees from consummating our then-pending Equity Offering and debt tender offer. On March 4, 2013, a hearing was held before the court on the TRO motion. The same day, the court denied the motion, finding that Del-Co had failed to meet its burden of showing a likelihood of success on the merits of its claims regarding the Equity Offering and debt tender offer. The Equity Offering closed the following morning, March 5, 2013.
On March 4, 2013, we filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association (AAA) for the First Del-Co Action on behalf of EQC and the individual defendants. On March 29, 2013, Del-Co filed an amended complaint in the First Del-Co Action adding plaintiffs Edmund Sweeney, Thomas Toldrian, and Howard Worsey. On March 26, 2014, the court denied with prejudice the plaintiffs’ motion for declaratory judgment that the arbitration bylaw was unenforceable and denied without prejudice the plaintiffs’ motion for declaratory judgment that the arbitration clauses in the RMR management agreements were unenforceable. On April 30, 2014, the Company and the individual defendants filed motions to compel arbitration, which the court granted on June 20, 2014. On June 23, 2014, the court dismissed the First Del-Co Action for the reasons set forth in its June 20, 2014 order.
On June 9, 2014, pursuant to an agreement of the parties, the AAA consolidated the arbitration arising from the claims asserted in the First Del-Co Action with the arbitration arising from the claims asserted in the Second Del-Co Action, which is discussed below. On June 26, 2014, the parties agreed to stay the consolidated Del-Co arbitration for 120 days, until October 24, 2014, pending the SLC’s investigation of the claims asserted in the Shareholder Actions. After the SLC completed
48
its investigation and finalized its report, on November 14, 2014, we filed a motion to dismiss in the consolidated Del-Co arbitration seeking dismissal of all claims.
On July 17, 2015, we entered into a Settlement and Release Agreement (“Del-Co Settlement Agreement”) with Del-Co and certain other named plaintiffs to resolve the First Del-Co Action and the Second Del-Co Action (discussed below). In accordance with the Del-Co Settlement Agreement, the Company paid $125,000 to the plaintiffs’ counsel in the First Del-Co Action for a portion of the costs and expenses incurred in connection with the First Del-Co Action. The parties also agreed to withdraw and dismiss the demand for arbitration with prejudice with respect to the First Del-Co Action and the Second Del-Co Action. On July 27, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Withdrawal, which included a copy of the Del-Co Settlement Agreement, with the AAA. On July 28, 2015, the AAA notified the parties that it closed its file on the First Del-Co Action and the Second Del-Co Action.
Delaware County Employees Retirement Fund v. Portnoy II
On January 24, 2014, Del-Co and Edmund Sweeney filed a second complaint in the Federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The case is titled Delaware County Employees Retirement Fund v. Portnoy, Civ. No. 1:14-cv-10186-DJC, or the Second Del-Co Action. The Second Del-Co Action purports to bring claims derivatively on behalf of the nominal defendant, EQC, against RMR and certain of our former officers and former Trustees. The complaint in the Second Del-Co Action asserts claims against the defendants for breach of fiduciary duty in connection with advancement and indemnification of legal fees for certain of our former officers and former Trustees, as well as claims for breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the failure to purchase director and officer liability insurance. The plaintiffs seek monetary and injunctive relief, including an injunction permanently enjoining the individual defendants from being indemnified or advanced any fees and expenses incurred.
On April 25, 2014, the defendants filed a demand for arbitration with the AAA. On the same day, the Company and the individual defendants each filed a motion with the court to compel arbitration and to stay or dismiss this action, and the parties completed briefing on May 21, 2014. On June 9, 2014, pursuant to an agreement of the parties, the AAA consolidated the arbitration arising from the claims asserted in the First Del-Co Action with the arbitration arising from the claims asserted in the Second Del-Co Action, as discussed above.
On July 9, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion with the court to stay the proceedings in the Second Del-Co Action pending the outcome of the SLC’s investigation of the claims asserted in the Shareholder Actions, which the court granted on July 10, 2014.
After the SLC completed its investigation and finalized its report, on November 14, 2014, we moved to dismiss the claims asserted in the Second Del-Co Action. A hearing on our motion to dismiss and the pending motions to compel arbitration and to stay or dismiss this action was held on January 28, 2015. No decision on these motions has been issued.
On July 17, 2015, we entered into the Del-Co Settlement Agreement with Del-Co and certain other named plaintiffs to resolve the First Del-Co Action and the Second Del-Co Action. As previously disclosed, the Del-Co Settlement Agreement provides for the dismissal with prejudice of all claims in the Second Del-Co Action with respect to the named plaintiffs. The Del-Co Settlement Agreement further provides that with respect to the Second Del-Co Action the plaintiffs and their counsel will not be reimbursed or otherwise compensated. The parties also agreed to withdraw and dismiss the demand for arbitration with prejudice with respect to the First Del-Co Action and the Second Del-Co Action. On July 20, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal, which included a copy of the Del-Co Settlement Agreement, with the court in the Second Del-Co Action. The court signed and entered the Order dismissing the Second Del-Co Action with prejudice on July 21, 2015. On July 27, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Withdrawal, which included a copy of the Del-Co Settlement Agreement, with the AAA. On July 28, 2015 the AAA notified the parties that it closed its file on the First Del-Co Action and the Second Del-Co Action.
William Gore v. Portnoy
On February 4, 2013, William Gore, a purported shareholder of EQC, filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, State of Maryland, titled William Gore v. Portnoy, Case No. 373086-V, or the Gore Action. The Gore Action purported to bring claims individually and derivatively on behalf of the nominal defendant, EQC, against certain of our former officers and former Trustees and EQC, as nominal defendant. The complaint alleged claims for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. The complaint sought injunctive and declaratory relief, restitution and damages, including counsel fees and expenses. On March 7, 2013, the Company filed a demand for arbitration with the AAA
49
for the Gore Action. On March 21, 2013, the parties each selected an arbitrator in this matter. On March 27, 2013, the parties agreed to stay all further proceedings pending a decision by the court on the arbitrability of Mr. Gore’s claims.
On May 20, 2013, certain of our former Trustees filed a petition for an order to arbitrate and for a stay of proceedings pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Arbitration Act. On June 21, 2013, Mr. Gore filed his response to the former Trustees’ petition for order to arbitrate, as well as a separate petition to stay arbitration, and the parties completed briefing on both petitions on August 2, 2013. On June 30, 2014, we filed a consent motion to stay proceedings in the Gore Action for 120 days, pending the outcome of the SLC’s investigation of the claims asserted in the Shareholder Actions, which the court denied on July 2, 2014. Subsequently, on August 1, 2014, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal of the Gore Action without prejudice.
On July 23, 2015, we entered into a settlement agreement (the "Gore Settlement Agreement") with Mr. Gore to resolve the Gore Action. As previously disclosed, the Gore Settlement Agreement provides that the plaintiffs will dismiss with prejudice all of the claims in the Gore Arbitration with respect to the named plaintiff. In accordance with the Gore Settlement Agreement, the Company paid $125,000 to the plaintiff’s counsel for a portion of the costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Gore Action and the Gore Arbitration. On July 27, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Withdrawal, which included a copy of the Gore Settlement Agreement, with the AAA. On July 28, 2015 the AAA notified the parties that it closed its file on the Gore Action.
Katz v. CommonWealth REIT
On March 7, 2013, Jason Matthew Katz, a purported shareholder of EQC, filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland. The case is titled Katz v. CommonWealth REIT, Case No. 24-C-13-001299, or the Katz Action. The Katz Action purports to bring claims individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated against EQC and certain of our former Trustees. The complaint alleges claims of breach of fiduciary duty and seeks injunctive and declaratory relief, rescission of the March 2013 equity offering, restitution and damages, including counsel fees, expenses and, if applicable, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest.
On April 1, 2013, the Company filed a demand for arbitration with the AAA for the Katz Action. Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order, as amended from time to time, on April 19, 2013, Mr. Katz filed a petition to stay arbitration. On May 8, 2013, the individual defendants filed a petition for an order to arbitrate and for a stay of the proceedings pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Arbitration Act. On May 16, 2014, the Company filed a petition seeking the same relief.
On January 21, 2014, the court granted the parties’ joint motion to consolidate the Katz Action with the Central Laborers Action, discussed below, and consolidated the actions under the caption Katz v. CommonWealth REIT, Case No. 24-C-13-001299, or the Consolidated Maryland Action.
On February 19, 2014, the court denied the plaintiffs’ petition to stay arbitration, granted the petitions for an order to arbitrate and for a stay of the proceedings, and ordered the parties to arbitrate the claims asserted in the Consolidated Maryland Action, or the Consolidated Arbitration. On June 12, 2014, Mr. Katz moved to stay entry of judgment and to revise, alter, amend or vacate the court’s February 19, 2014 decision. On June 30, 2014, the court granted the parties’ joint request to stay this action for 120 days, pending the outcome of the SLC’s investigation of the claims asserted in the Shareholder Actions.
After the SLC completed its investigation and finalized its report, on November 14, 2014, we moved to dismiss the claims asserted in the Consolidated Maryland Action. On November 17, 2014, the plaintiffs in the Consolidated Maryland Action submitted a status report to the court asking the court to consider Mr. Katz’s motion to vacate the court’s February 19, 2014 decision. On November 19, 2014, the court denied Mr. Katz’s motion to vacate. Having already ordered the parties to arbitration, on December 1, 2014, the court denied our motion to dismiss without prejudice as moot.
On July 31, 2015, we entered into a settlement agreement (the "Consolidated Maryland Action Settlement Agreement") with the plaintiffs to resolve the Consolidated Maryland Action and the Consolidated Arbitration. As previously disclosed, the Consolidated Maryland Action Settlement Agreement provides that the plaintiffs will dismiss with prejudice all of the claims and arbitration demands in the Consolidated Maryland Action and the Consolidated Arbitration with respect to the named plaintiffs. In accordance with the Consolidated Maryland Action Settlement Agreement, the Company paid an aggregate amount of $200,000 to the plaintiffs’ counsel in the Consolidated Maryland Action for a portion of the costs and expenses incurred in connection with those two actions. On August 5, 2015, a joint stipulation of dismissal was filed with the court. On August 25, 2015, the court entered the stipulation and dismissed the Consolidated Maryland Action. A notice of withdrawal was then submitted to the AAA, and the AAA subsequently notified the parties that it closed its file on the Consolidated Maryland Action.
50
Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Portnoy
On April 5, 2013, the Central Laborers’ Pension Fund, or Central Laborers, a purported shareholder of EQC, filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland. The case is titled Central Laborers Pension Fund v. Portnoy, Case No. 24-C-13-001966, or the Central Laborers Action. The Central Laborers Action purports to bring claims individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of EQC against EQC and certain of our former Trustees. The complaint alleges, among other things, claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and waste of corporate assets. The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, restitution and damages, including counsel fees and expenses. On April 17, 2013, Central Laborers filed an amended complaint, adding plaintiff William McGinley, a purported shareholder of EQC, and requesting a declaration that EQC’s shareholders may remove Trustees without cause.
The Company filed a demand for arbitration with the AAA on April 25, 2013. The Company and our former trustees filed petitions for an order to arbitrate and for a stay of proceedings pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Arbitration Act on May 8, 2013 and May 16, 2013, respectively. On May 31, 2013, Central Laborers and Mr. McGinley filed a second amended complaint, adding plaintiff Howard Ginsberg, a purported shareholder of EQC. Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order, as amended from time to time, the parties completed briefing on the pending petitions on June 17, 2013. On January 21, 2014, the court granted the parties’ joint stipulation and motion to consolidate the Katz Action with the Central Laborers Action and consolidated the actions under the caption Katz v. CommonWealth REIT, Case No. 24-C-13-001299, discussed above.
As discussed above, on July 31, 2015, we entered into the Consolidated Maryland Action Settlement Agreement with the plaintiffs to resolve the Consolidated Maryland Action and the Consolidated Arbitration. The Consolidated Maryland Action Settlement Agreement provides that the plaintiffs will dismiss with prejudice all of the claims and arbitration demands in the Consolidated Maryland Action and the Consolidated Arbitration with respect to the named plaintiffs. In accordance with the Consolidated Maryland Action Settlement Agreement, the Company paid an aggregate amount of $200,000 to the plaintiffs’ counsel in the Consolidated Maryland Action for a portion of the costs and expenses incurred in connection with those two actions. On August 5, 2015, a joint stipulation of dismissal was filed with the court. On August 25, 2015, the court entered the stipulation and dismissed the Consolidated Maryland Action. A notice of withdrawal was then submitted to the AAA, and the AAA subsequently notified the parties that it closed its file on the Consolidated Maryland Action.
Chashin v. Reit Management & Research LLC
On October 3, 2013, A. Bruce Chashin, a purported shareholder of EQC, filed a complaint in the Federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The case is titled Chashin v. Reit Management & Research LLC, Civ. No. 1:13-cv-12472-DJC, or the Chashin Action. The complaint in the Chashin Action purported to bring claims derivatively on behalf of EQC against EQC, certain of our former officers and former Trustees, and our former manager, RMR, and challenged the arbitration clauses contained in our bylaws and our management agreements with RMR. The complaint also asserted, among other things, claims for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets and abuse of a position of control, and sought declaratory and injunctive relief, restitution and damages, including the imposition of a constructive trust and fees and expenses. On November 4, 2013, the defendants filed a demand for arbitration with the AAA, or the Chashin Arbitration. On March 21, 2014, Mr. Chashin voluntarily dismissed the Chashin Action without prejudice.
The parties each selected an arbitrator in the Chashin Arbitration, and the party arbitrators selected a neutral arbitrator (collectively, the three arbitrators comprise the Chashin Arbitration Panel). On June 12, 2014, Mr. Chashin filed his response to claims and counterclaims against claimants (Counterclaims), alleging claims and seeking relief similar to his previously filed complaint in the Chashin Action. On July 3, 2014, EQC filed a motion to stay proceedings for 120 days pending the outcome of the SLC’s investigation of the claims asserted in the Shareholder Actions. A preliminary hearing was held on July 10, 2014, at which the Chashin Arbitration Panel bifurcated for administrative purposes the claims Mr. Chashin alleged derivatively from those he alleged directly. The Chashin Arbitration Panel also (i) granted EQC’s motion to stay proceedings as to Mr. Chashin's derivative claims, and (ii) established a briefing schedule for claimants to file motions to dismiss Mr. Chashin's direct claims and for cross-motions for summary judgment relating to enforceability of the Company's arbitration by-laws.
On August 15, 2014, EQC and the individual defendants moved to dismiss all of Mr. Chashin’s direct claims. On October 2, 2014, the individual defendants and RMR filed motions for summary judgment relating to enforceability of the arbitration by-laws. After the SLC completed its investigation and finalized its report, we submitted the report to the Chashin Arbitration Panel on November 10, 2014. At the panel’s request, the parties then submitted letter briefs on November 28, 2014 as to whether to respect the SLC’s determination and dismiss the Counterclaims. In its letter brief, the Company requested the Chashin Arbitration Panel respect the SLC’s determination and dismiss the Counterclaims. A hearing on these matters was held on December 3, 2014.
51
On January 20, 2015, the Chashin Arbitration Panel issued an interim award on the motions heard at the December 3, 2014 hearing. The award grants EQC’s and the other defendants’ motions to dismiss Mr. Chashin’s direct claims. The interim award also grants the individual defendants’ and RMR’s motions for summary judgment on enforceability of the arbitration by-law, holding that the arbitration by-law is valid and enforceable in all respects, including the provision in the arbitration by-law that prohibits an arbitration panel from shifting the claimant’s costs or attorneys’ fees to another party. In its award, the Chashin Arbitration Panel determined that it could not at that time rule on the Company’s request to dismiss the derivative claims and gave Mr. Chashin until February 4, 2015 to decide whether to pursue his derivative claims further in light of the Panel’s ruling that the arbitration by-law, including its fee-shifting prohibition, is valid and enforceable. On February 2, 2015, the Chashin Arbitration Panel was informed that Mr. Chashin intended to pursue his derivative claims.
On August 17, 2015, we entered into a settlement agreement (the "Chashin Settlement Agreement") to resolve the Chashin Arbitration. As previously disclosed, the Chashin Settlement Agreement provides the plaintiffs-in-interest will dismiss with prejudice all of the counterclaims in the Chashin Arbitration with respect to the plaintiffs-in-interest. In accordance with the Chashin Settlement Agreement, the Company paid $75,000 to the plaintiffs-in-interest’s counsel for a portion of the costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Chashin Action. A notice of withdrawal was submitted to the AAA on August 17, 2015, and the AAA subsequently notified the parties on August 26, 2015 that it closed its file on the Chashin Action.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Not applicable.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
The following table provides information with respect to the common share repurchases made by the Company during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Number or Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||
August 2015 | 1,068,701 | $ | 25.85 | 1,068,701 | $ | 72,374,597 | ||||||||
September 2015 | 2,341,599 | $ | 25.72 | 2,341,599 | $ | 112,153,766 | ||||||||
Total | 3,410,300 | $ | 25.76 | 3,410,300 | $ | 112,153,766 |
(1) The Company's common share repurchase program, approved by our Board of Trustees on August 24, 2015, authorizes the repurchase of up to $100.0 million of the Company's outstanding common shares over the twelve month period following the date of authorization. On September 14, 2015, our Board of Trustees authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $100.0 million of our outstanding common shares over the twelve month period following the date of authorization.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit Number | Description |
3.1 | Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Declaration of Trust of the Company, dated July 1, 1994, as amended to date. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 1, 2014.) |
52
Exhibit Number | Description |
3.2 | Articles Supplementary, dated October 10, 2006. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 11, 2006.) |
3.3 | Articles Supplementary, dated May 31, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 31, 2011.) |
3.4 | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, adopted July 31, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 1, 2014.) |
4.1 | Form of Common Share Certificate. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014.) |
4.2 | Form of 61/2% Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Share Certificate. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.) |
4.3 | Form of 71/4% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share Certificate. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.) |
4.4 | Indenture, dated as of July 9, 1997, between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File Number 001-09317.) |
4.5 | Supplemental Indenture No. 14, dated as of August 5, 2004, between the Company and U.S. Bank, relating to the Company’s 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, including form thereof. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, File Number 001-09317.) |
4.6 | Supplemental Indenture No. 17, dated as of June 25, 2007, between the Company and U.S. Bank, relating to the Company’s 6.25% Senior Notes due 2017, including form thereof. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, File Number 001-09317.) |
4.7 | Supplemental Indenture No. 18, dated as of September 18, 2007, between the Company and U.S. Bank, relating to the Company’s 6.65% Senior Notes due 2018, including form thereof. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, File Number 001-09317.) |
4.8 | Supplemental Indenture No. 20, dated as of September 17, 2010, between the Company and U.S. Bank, relating to the Company’s 5.875% Senior Notes due 2020, including form thereof. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.) |
4.9 | Supplemental Indenture No. 21, dated as of July 25, 2012, between the Company and U.S. Bank, relating to the Company’s 5.75% Senior Notes due 2042, including form thereof. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated July 25, 2012.) |
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification. (Filed herewith.) |
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification. (Filed herewith.) |
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification. (Furnished herewith.) |
101.1 | The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) related notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail. (Filed herewith.) |
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
EQUITY COMMONWEALTH | ||
By: | /s/ David A. Helfand | |
David A. Helfand | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
Dated: November 5, 2015 | ||
By: | /s/ Adam S. Markman | |
Adam S. Markman | ||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ||
Dated: November 5, 2015 |
54