Annual Statements Open main menu

Extra Space Storage Inc. - Quarter Report: 2013 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

 

or

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                  to                 .

 

Commission File Number: 001-32269

 

EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Maryland

 

20-1076777

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

2795 East Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 400

Salt Lake City, Utah 84121

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (801) 365-4600

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer x

 

Accelerated filer o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Smaller reporting company o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

 

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, as of July 31, 2013, was 111,223,834.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

3

 

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

4

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

10

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

23

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

34

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

35

 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

35

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

35

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

35

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

35

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

35

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

36

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

36

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

36

SIGNATURES

37

 

2



Table of Contents

 

STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

 

Certain information presented in this report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions and other information that is not historical information. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipates,” or “intends”, or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. We may also make additional forward-looking statements from time to time. All such subsequent forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, by us or on our behalf, are also expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.

 

All forward-looking statements, including without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends and estimate of future earnings, are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them, but there can be no assurance that management’s expectations, beliefs and projections will result or be achieved. All forward-looking statements apply only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

 

There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in or contemplated by this report. Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of the risks referenced in “Part II. Item 1A. Risk Factors” below and in “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors” included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such factors include, but are not limited to:

 

·                  adverse changes in general economic conditions, the real estate industry and the markets in which we operate;

 

·                  failure to close pending acquisitions on expected terms, or at all;

 

·                  the effect of competition from new and existing self-storage facilities or other storage alternatives, which could cause rents and occupancy rates to decline;

 

·                  difficulties in our ability to evaluate, finance, complete and integrate acquisitions and developments successfully and to lease up those properties, which could adversely affect our profitability;

 

·                  potential liability for uninsured losses and environmental contamination;

 

·                  the impact of the regulatory environment as well as national, state, and local laws and regulations including, without limitation, those governing real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), which could increase our expenses and reduce our cash available for distribution;

 

·                  disruptions in credit and financial markets and resulting difficulties in raising capital or obtaining credit at reasonable rates or at all, which could impede our ability to grow;

 

·                  increased interest rates and operating costs;

 

·                  reductions in asset valuations and related impairment charges;

 

·                  the failure of our joint venture partners to fulfill their obligations to us or their pursuit of actions that are inconsistent with our objectives;

 

·                  the failure to maintain our REIT status for federal income tax purposes;

 

·                  economic uncertainty due to the impact of war or terrorism, which could adversely affect our business plan; and

 

·                  difficulties in our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and management members.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(amounts in thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

June 30, 2013

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate assets, net

 

$

3,027,654

 

$

2,991,722

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures

 

101,698

 

106,313

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

206,932

 

30,785

 

Restricted cash

 

20,502

 

16,976

 

Receivables from related parties and affiliated real estate joint ventures

 

3,258

 

11,078

 

Other assets, net

 

72,572

 

66,603

 

Total assets

 

$

3,432,616

 

$

3,223,477

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities, Noncontrolling Interests and Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable

 

$

1,409,982

 

$

1,369,690

 

Premium on notes payable

 

2,546

 

3,319

 

Exchangeable senior notes

 

250,000

 

 

Discount on exchangeable senior notes

 

(18,133

)

 

Notes payable to trusts

 

119,590

 

119,590

 

Lines of credit

 

 

85,000

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

46,982

 

52,299

 

Other liabilities

 

31,858

 

48,248

 

Total liabilities

 

1,842,825

 

1,678,146

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling Interests and Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Extra Space Storage Inc. stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 111,223,460 and 110,737,205 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively

 

1,112

 

1,107

 

Paid-in capital

 

1,765,577

 

1,740,037

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (deficit)

 

5,108

 

(14,273

)

Accumulated deficit

 

(241,391

)

(235,064

)

Total Extra Space Storage Inc. stockholders’ equity

 

1,530,406

 

1,491,807

 

Noncontrolling interest represented by Preferred Operating Partnership units, net of $100,000 note receivable

 

30,033

 

29,918

 

Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership

 

28,877

 

22,492

 

Other noncontrolling interests

 

475

 

1,114

 

Total noncontrolling interests and equity

 

1,589,791

 

1,545,331

 

Total liabilities, noncontrolling interests and equity

 

$

3,432,616

 

$

3,223,477

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(amounts in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property rental

 

$

107,340

 

$

79,284

 

$

210,263

 

$

155,128

 

Tenant reinsurance

 

12,110

 

9,008

 

22,331

 

17,565

 

Management fees

 

6,796

 

6,659

 

12,974

 

13,245

 

Total revenues

 

126,246

 

94,951

 

245,568

 

185,938

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

33,462

 

26,012

 

67,899

 

52,608

 

Tenant reinsurance

 

2,202

 

1,424

 

4,112

 

3,272

 

Acquisition related costs

 

683

 

469

 

1,135

 

1,078

 

General and administrative

 

13,739

 

12,545

 

26,508

 

25,185

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

22,785

 

16,626

 

45,810

 

33,150

 

Total expenses

 

72,871

 

57,076

 

145,464

 

115,293

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations

 

53,375

 

37,875

 

100,104

 

70,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of real estate assets

 

800

 

 

800

 

 

Interest expense

 

(18,362

)

(15,854

)

(35,728

)

(33,925

)

Non-cash interest expense related to amortization of discount on equity component of exchangeable senior notes

 

(113

)

 

(113

)

(444

)

Interest income

 

133

 

448

 

317

 

723

 

Interest income on note receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder

 

1,212

 

1,212

 

2,425

 

2,425

 

Income before equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures and income tax expense

 

37,045

 

23,681

 

67,805

 

39,424

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures

 

2,914

 

2,698

 

5,537

 

4,994

 

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures - gain on sale of real estate assets and purchase of joint venture partners’ interests

 

 

 

2,556

 

5,429

 

Income tax expense

 

(2,858

)

(1,634

)

(4,866

)

(2,584

)

Net income

 

37,101

 

24,745

 

71,032

 

47,263

 

Net income allocated to Preferred Operating Partnership noncontrolling interests

 

(1,745

)

(1,654

)

(3,462

)

(3,303

)

Net income allocated to Operating Partnership and other noncontrolling interests

 

(890

)

(678

)

(1,679

)

(1,333

)

Net income attributable to common stockholders

 

$

34,466

 

$

22,413

 

$

65,891

 

$

42,627

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per common share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.31

 

$

0.22

 

$

0.59

 

$

0.43

 

Diluted

 

$

0.31

 

$

0.22

 

$

0.59

 

$

0.43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

111,137,437

 

102,107,535

 

110,974,504

 

98,497,788

 

Diluted

 

115,359,245

 

106,653,965

 

115,237,500

 

103,063,565

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends paid per common share

 

$

0.40

 

$

0.20

 

$

0.65

 

$

0.40

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(amounts in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

37,101

 

$

24,745

 

$

71,032

 

$

47,263

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps

 

18,469

 

(3,517

)

20,040

 

(3,732

)

Total comprehensive income

 

55,570

 

21,228

 

91,072

 

43,531

 

Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

3,237

 

2,198

 

5,800

 

4,493

 

Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders

 

$

52,333

 

$

19,030

 

$

85,272

 

$

39,038

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity

(amounts in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

 

 

 

Noncontrolling Interests

 

Extra Space Storage Inc. Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating

 

Operating

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paid-in

 

Comprehensive

 

Accumulated

 

Total

 

 

 

Partnership

 

Partnership

 

Other

 

Shares

 

Par Value

 

Capital

 

Income (Deficit)

 

Deficit

 

Equity

 

Balances at December 31, 2012

 

$

29,918

 

$

22,492

 

$

1,114

 

110,737,205

 

$

1,107

 

$

1,740,037

 

$

(14,273

)

$

(235,064

)

$

1,545,331

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of options

 

 

 

 

369,363

 

4

 

5,548

 

 

 

5,552

 

Restricted stock grants issued

 

 

 

 

130,302

 

1

 

 

 

 

1

 

Restricted stock grants cancelled

 

 

 

 

(13,410

)

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation expense related to stock-based awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,585

 

 

 

2,585

 

Purchase of additional equity interests in existing consolidated joint ventures

 

 

 

(635

)

 

 

(515

)

 

 

(1,150

)

Issuance of exchangeable senior notes - equity component

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,496

 

 

 

14,496

 

Issuance of Operating Partnership units for interest in real estate assets

 

 

6,130

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,130

 

Redemption of Operating Partnership units for cash

 

 

(41

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(41

)

Net income

 

3,462

 

1,656

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

65,891

 

71,032

 

Other comprehensive income

 

171

 

488

 

 

 

 

 

19,381

 

 

20,040

 

Tax effect from vesting of restricted stock grants and stock option exercises

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,426

 

 

 

3,426

 

Distributions to Operating Partnership units held by noncontrolling interests

 

(3,518

)

(1,848

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,366

)

Distributions to other noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

(27

)

 

 

 

 

 

(27

)

Dividends paid on common stock at $0.65 per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(72,218

)

(72,218

)

Balances at June 30, 2013

 

$

30,033

 

$

28,877

 

$

475

 

111,223,460

 

$

1,112

 

$

1,765,577

 

$

5,108

 

$

(241,391

)

$

1,589,791

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

7



Table of Contents

 

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(amounts in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

 

 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

71,032

 

$

47,263

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

45,810

 

33,150

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

3,035

 

3,370

 

Non-cash interest expense related to amortization of discount on exchangeable senior notes

 

113

 

444

 

Non-cash interest expense related to amortization of premium on notes payable

 

(773

)

(631

)

Compensation expense related to stock-based awards

 

2,585

 

2,321

 

Gain on purchase of joint venture partners’ interests

 

(2,556

)

 

Distributions from unconsolidated real estate ventures in excess of earnings

 

1,924

 

186

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables from related parties and affiliated real estate joint ventures

 

5,561

 

2,541

 

Other assets

 

1,948

 

1,161

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

(5,317

)

2,044

 

Other liabilities

 

3,189

 

772

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

126,551

 

92,621

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition, development and redevelopment of real estate assets

 

(62,036

)

(46,497

)

Proceeds from sale of real estate assets

 

929

 

 

Investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures

 

(955

)

(702

)

Return of investment in unconsolidated real estate ventures

 

 

1,848

 

Change in restricted cash

 

(3,526

)

(11,466

)

Purchase of notes receivable

 

 

(7,875

)

Purchase of equipment and fixtures

 

(1,478

)

(1,223

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(67,066

)

(65,915

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from the sale of common stock, net of offering costs

 

 

226,698

 

Net proceeds from issuance of exchangeable senior notes

 

246,250

 

 

Repurchase of exchangeable senior notes

 

 

(87,663

)

Proceeds from notes payable and lines of credit

 

267,960

 

326,481

 

Principal payments on notes payable and lines of credit

 

(319,790

)

(290,069

)

Deferred financing costs

 

(5,658

)

(4,791

)

Redemption of Operating Partnership units held by noncontrolling interest

 

(41

)

(155

)

Net proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

5,552

 

6,138

 

Dividends paid on common stock

 

(72,218

)

(39,829

)

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

(5,393

)

(4,498

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

116,662

 

132,312

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

176,147

 

159,018

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period

 

30,785

 

26,484

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period

 

$

206,932

 

$

185,502

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

8



Table of Contents

 

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(amounts in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

 

 

 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Supplemental schedule of cash flow information

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized

 

$

32,548

 

$

31,215

 

Income taxes paid

 

1,198

 

473

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Tax effect from vesting of restricted stock grants and stock option exercises:

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

$

3,426

 

$

2,238

 

Paid-in capital

 

(3,426

)

(2,238

)

Acquisitions of real estate assets

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate assets, net

 

$

15,503

 

$

429

 

Notes payable assumed

 

(7,122

)

 

Operating Partnership units issued

 

(6,130

)

(429

)

Receivables from related parties and affiliated real estate joint ventures

 

(2,251

)

 

Receivable from sale of interest in real estate ventures

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

$

 

$

3,349

 

Investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures

 

 

(3,349

)

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

9



Table of Contents

 

EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Amounts in thousands, except property and share data

 

1.              ORGANIZATION

 

Extra Space Storage Inc. (the “Company”) is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”), formed as a Maryland corporation on April 30, 2004, to own, operate, manage, acquire, develop and redevelop professionally managed self-storage facilities located throughout the United States. The Company continues the business of Extra Space Storage LLC and its subsidiaries, which had engaged in the self-storage business since 1977. The Company’s interest in its properties is held through its operating partnership, Extra Space Storage LP (the “Operating Partnership”), which was formed on May 5, 2004. The Company’s primary assets are general partner and limited partner interests in the Operating Partnership. This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT, or UPREIT. The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.  To the extent the Company continues to qualify as a REIT, it will not be subject to tax, with certain limited exceptions, on the taxable income that is distributed to its stockholders.

 

The Company invests in self-storage facilities by acquiring wholly-owned facilities or by acquiring an equity interest in real estate entities.  At June 30, 2013, the Company had direct and indirect equity interests in 732 operating storage facilities.  In addition, the Company managed 242 properties for third parties, bringing the total number of operating properties which it owns and/or manages to 974.  These properties are located in 35 states, Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico.

 

The Company operates in three distinct segments: (1) rental operations; (2) tenant reinsurance; and (3) property management, acquisition and development. The rental operations activities include rental operations of self-storage facilities. No single tenant accounts for more than 5% of rental income.  Tenant reinsurance activities include the reinsurance of risks relating to the loss of goods stored by tenants in the Company’s self-storage facilities. The Company’s property management, acquisition and development activities include managing, acquiring, developing and redeveloping self-storage facilities.

 

2.              BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company are presented on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they may not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012, has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements as of that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-02 “Comprehensive Income — Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” which supersedes and replaces the presentation requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income in ASUs 2011-05 and 2011-12. The amendment requires an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under GAAP. For other amounts that are not required under GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. ASU 2013-02 was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2012. The Company adopted the amended standards beginning January 1, 2013 and presents accumulated other comprehensive income in accordance with the requirements of the standard.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

3.              FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

 

Currently, the Company uses interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate forward curves.

 

The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees. In conjunction with the FASB’s fair value measurement guidance, the Company made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio.

 

Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. However, as of June 30, 2013, the Company had assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety were classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The table below presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

 

Description

 

June 30, 2013

 

Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical
Assets (Level 1)

 

Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)

 

Other assets - Cash Flow Hedge Swap Agreements

 

$

9,687

 

$

 

$

9,687

 

$

 

Other liabilities - Cash Flow Hedge Swap Agreements

 

$

(5,037

)

$

 

$

(5,037

)

$

 

 

There were no transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 during the six months ended June 30, 2013.  The Company did not have any significant assets or liabilities that are re-measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

 

Long-lived assets held for use are evaluated for impairment when events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment.  The Company reviews each self-storage facility at least annually to determine if any such events or circumstances have occurred or exist. The Company focuses on facilities where occupancy and/or rental income have decreased by a significant amount.  For these facilities, the Company determines whether the decrease is temporary or permanent, and whether the facility will likely recover the lost occupancy and/or revenue in the short term.  In addition, the Company carefully reviews facilities in the lease-up stage and compares actual operating results to original projections.

 

When the Company determines that an event that may indicate impairment has occurred, the Company compares the carrying value of the related long-lived assets to the undiscounted future net operating cash flows attributable to the assets.  An impairment loss is recorded if the net carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future net operating cash flows attributable to the assets.  The impairment loss recognized equals the excess of net carrying value over the related fair value of the assets.

 

11



Table of Contents

 

When real estate assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Company discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the fair value of the assets, net of selling costs.  If the estimated fair value, net of selling costs, of the assets that have been identified as held for sale is less than the net carrying value of the assets, then a valuation allowance is established.  The operations of assets held for sale or sold during the period are generally presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

 

The Company assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of its investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures may be impaired annually and when events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment.  An investment is impaired if management’s estimate of the fair value of the investment is less than its carrying value.  To the extent impairment has occurred, and is considered to be other than temporary, the loss is measured as the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the investment.

 

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of self-storage facilities, the purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their fair values, which are estimated using significant unobservable inputs. The value of the tangible assets, consisting of land and buildings, is determined as if vacant. Intangible assets, which represent the value of existing tenant relationships, are recorded at their fair values based on the avoided cost to replace the current leases. The Company measures the value of tenant relationships based on the rent lost due to the amount of time required to replace existing customers, which is based on the Company’s historical experience with turnover in its facilities. Debt assumed as part of an acquisition is recorded at fair value based on current interest rates compared to contractual rates. Acquisition-related transaction costs are expensed as incurred.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, other financial instruments included in other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, variable-rate notes payable, lines of credit and other liabilities reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 approximate fair value. The fair value of the Company’s note receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder was based on the discounted estimated future cash flows of the note (categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy); the discount rate used approximated the current market rate for loans with similar maturities and credit quality.  The fair values of the Company’s fixed-rate notes payable, notes payable to trusts and exchangeable senior notes were estimated using the discounted estimated future cash payments to be made on such debt (categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy); the discount rates used approximated current market rates for loans, or groups of loans, with similar maturities and credit quality.

 

The fair values of the Company’s fixed-rate assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

June 30, 2013

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

Fair

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

Carrying

 

 

 

Value

 

Value

 

Value

 

Value

 

Note receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder

 

$

104,276

 

$

100,000

 

$

108,138

 

$

100,000

 

Fixed rate notes payable and notes payable to trusts

 

$

1,258,731

 

$

1,257,954

 

$

1,342,957

 

$

1,275,605

 

Exchangeable senior notes

 

$

231,250

 

$

250,000

 

$

 

$

 

 

4.              NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

 

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding, including unvested share-based payment awards that contain a non-forfeitable right to dividends or dividend equivalents.  Diluted earnings per common share measures the performance of the Company over the reporting period while giving effect to all potential common shares that were dilutive and outstanding during the period. The denominator includes the weighted average number of basic shares and the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares that were dilutive had been issued, and is calculated using either the treasury stock or as if-converted method. Potential common shares are securities (such as options, convertible debt, exchangeable Series A Participating Redeemable Preferred Operating Partnership units (“Preferred OP units”) and exchangeable Operating Partnership units (“OP units”)) that do not have a current right to participate in earnings but could do so in the future by virtue of their option or conversion right. In computing the dilutive effect of convertible securities, net income is adjusted to add back any changes in earnings in the period associated with the convertible security. The numerator also is adjusted for the effects of any other non-discretionary changes in income or loss that would result from the assumed conversion of those

 

12



Table of Contents

 

potential common shares. In computing diluted earnings per share, only potential common shares that are dilutive (those that reduce earnings per share) are included.

 

The Operating Partnership had $250,000 of its 2.375% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2033 (the “Notes”) issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013.  The Notes could potentially have a dilutive effect on the Company’s earnings per share calculations.  The Notes are exchangeable by holders into shares of the Company’s common stock under certain circumstances per the terms of the indenture governing the Notes.  The exchange price of the Notes was $55.69 per share as of June 30, 2013, and could change over time as described in the indenture.  The Company has irrevocably agreed to pay only cash for the accreted principal amount of the Notes relative to its exchange obligations, but retained the right to satisfy the exchange obligation in excess of the accreted principal amount in cash and/or common stock.  Though the Company has retained that right, Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260, “Earnings per Share,” requires an assumption that shares would be used to pay the exchange obligation in excess of the accreted principal amount, and requires that those shares be included in the Company’s calculation of weighted average common shares outstanding for the diluted earnings per share computation.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 no shares related to the Notes were included in the computation for diluted earnings per share as the per share price of the Company’s common stock during this period did not exceed the exchange price.

 

For the purposes of computing the diluted impact on earnings per share of the potential conversion of Preferred OP units into common shares, where the Company has the option to redeem in cash or shares and where the Company has stated the positive intent and ability to settle at least $115,000 of the instrument in cash (or net settle a portion of the Preferred OP units against the related outstanding note receivable), only the amount of the instrument in excess of $115,000 is considered in the calculation of shares contingently issuable for the purposes of computing diluted earnings per share as allowed by ASC 260-10-45-46.

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, options to purchase 52,471 and 66,042 shares of common stock, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, options to purchase 39,171 and 48,980 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the computation of earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.  All restricted stock grants have been included in basic and diluted shares outstanding because such shares earn a non-forfeitable dividend and carry voting rights.

 

The computation of net income per common share was as follows for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net income attributable to common stockholders

 

$

34,466

 

$

22,413

 

$

65,891

 

$

42,627

 

Add: Income allocated to noncontrolling interest - Preferred Operating Partnership and Operating Partnership

 

2,624

 

2,325

 

5,118

 

4,625

 

Subtract: Fixed component of income allocated to noncontrolling interest - Preferred Operating Partnership

 

(1,438

)

(1,437

)

(2,875

)

(2,875

)

Net income for diluted computations

 

$

35,652

 

$

23,301

 

$

68,134

 

$

44,377

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average number of common shares outstanding - basic

 

111,137,437

 

102,107,535

 

110,974,504

 

98,497,788

 

Operating Partnership units

 

2,898,510

 

3,060,467

 

2,898,510

 

3,060,467

 

Preferred Operating Partnership units

 

989,980

 

989,980

 

989,980

 

989,980

 

Shares related to dilutive and cancelled stock options

 

333,318

 

495,983

 

374,506

 

515,330

 

Average number of common shares outstanding - diluted

 

115,359,245

 

106,653,965

 

115,237,500

 

103,063,565

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per common share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.31

 

$

0.22

 

$

0.59

 

$

0.43

 

Diluted

 

$

0.31

 

$

0.22

 

$

0.59

 

$

0.43

 

 

13



Table of Contents

 

5.              PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s acquisitions of operating properties for the six months ended June 30, 2013, and does not include purchases of land, purchases of additional equity interests in existing consolidated joint ventures or improvements made to existing assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consideration Paid

 

Acquisition Date Fair Value

 

 

 

Property
Location

 

Number of
Properties

 

Date of
Acquisition

 

Total

 

Cash Paid

 

Loan
Assumed

 

Non-cash
gain

 

Notes
Issued
to/from
Seller

 

Previous
equity
interest

 

Net
Liabilities/
(Assets)
Assumed

 

Value of
OP Units
Issued

 

Number of
OP Units
Issued

 

Land

 

Building

 

Intangible

 

Closing
costs -
expensed

 

Notes

 

Maryland

 

1

 

2/13/2013

 

$

12,321

 

$

8,029

 

$

 

$

2,215

 

$

 

$

2,273

 

$

(196

)

$

 

 

$

1,266

 

$

10,789

 

$

260

 

$

6

 

(1)

 

Illinois

 

1

 

2/13/2013

 

11,083

 

7,592

 

 

341

 

2,251

 

1,173

 

(274

)

 

 

1,318

 

9,485

 

190

 

90

 

(1)

 

Hawaii

 

2

 

5/3/2013

 

27,560

 

27,648

 

 

 

 

 

(88

)

 

 

5,991

 

20,976

 

438

 

155

 

 

 

Texas

 

1

 

5/8/2013

 

7,104

 

7,057

 

 

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

1,374

 

5,636

 

86

 

8

 

 

 

Maryland

 

1

 

6/10/2013

 

13,688

 

500

 

7,122

 

 

 

 

(64

)

6,130

 

143,860

 

2,160

 

11,340

 

 

188

 

 

 

2013 Totals

 

6

 

 

 

$

71,756

 

$

50,826

 

$

7,122

 

$

2,556

 

$

2,251

 

$

3,446

 

$

(575

)

$

6,130

 

143,860

 

$

12,109

 

$

58,226

 

$

974

 

$

447

 

 

 

 


(1) Acquired from an affiliated joint venture

 

In June 2013, the Company recorded a gain of $800 due to the condemnation of a portion of land at one self-storage property in California that resulted from eminent domain.

 

On May 16, 2013, the Company sold a property located in New York for $950.  No gain or loss was recorded as a result of the sale.

 

6.              VARIABLE INTERESTS

 

The Company has an interest in one unconsolidated joint venture with an unrelated third party which is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The Company holds an 18% equity interest and a 50% profit interest in the VIE joint venture (“VIE JV”), and has 50% of the voting rights in the VIE JV. Qualification as a VIE was based on the determination that the equity investment at risk for this joint venture was not sufficient based on a qualitative and quantitative analysis performed by the Company. The Company performed a qualitative analysis for this joint venture to determine which party was the primary beneficiary. The Company determined that, since the powers to direct the activities most significant to the economic performance of this entity are shared equally by the Company and its joint venture partner, there is no primary beneficiary. Accordingly, this interest is recorded using the equity method.

 

The VIE JV owns a single self-storage property. This joint venture is financed through a combination of (1) equity contributions from the Company and its joint venture partner, (2) a primary mortgage note payable and (3) amounts payable to the Company. The amounts payable to the Company consist of expenses paid on behalf of the joint venture by the Company as manager and a secondary mortgage note payable to the Company. The Company performs management services for the VIE JV in exchange for a management fee of approximately 6% of cash collected by the property. Except as disclosed, the Company has not provided financial or other support during the periods presented to the VIE JV that it was not previously contractually obligated to provide.

 

The Company guarantees the primary mortgage note payable for the VIE JV. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss for this joint venture as of June 30, 2013 is the total of the guaranteed loan balance, amounts payable to the Company and the Company’s investment balance in the joint venture. The Company believes that the risk of incurring a material loss as a result of having to perform on the loan guarantee is unlikely and, therefore, no liability has been recorded related to this guarantee. Additionally, repossessing and/or selling the self-storage facility and land that collateralize the loan could provide funds sufficient to reimburse the Company.

 

The following table compares the Company’s liability balance to the VIE JV and the maximum exposure to loss as of June 30, 2013:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance of

 

Amounts

 

Maximum

 

 

 

 

 

Liability

 

Investment

 

Guaranteed

 

Payable to

 

Exposure

 

 

 

 

 

Balance

 

Balance

 

Loan

 

the Company

 

to Loss

 

Difference

 

Extra Space of Sacramento One LLC

 

$

 

$

(1,064

)

$

4,307

 

$

6,044

 

$

9,287

 

$

(9,287

)

 

The Operating Partnership has three wholly-owned unconsolidated subsidiaries (“Trust,” “Trust II” and “Trust III,” together, the “Trusts”) that have issued trust preferred securities to third parties and common securities to the Operating Partnership.

 

14



Table of Contents

 

The proceeds from the sale of the preferred and common securities were loaned in the form of notes to the Operating Partnership.  The Trusts are VIEs because the holders of the equity investment at risk (the trust preferred securities) do not have the power to direct the activities of the entities that most significantly affect the entities’ economic performance because of their lack of voting or similar rights.  Because the Operating Partnership’s investment in the Trusts’ common securities was financed directly by the Trusts as a result of its loan of the proceeds to the Operating Partnership, that investment is not considered an equity investment at risk.  The Operating Partnership’s investment in the Trusts is not a variable interest because equity interests are variable interests only to the extent that the investment is considered to be at risk, and therefore the Operating Partnership cannot be the primary beneficiary of the Trusts.  Since the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the Trusts, they have not been consolidated.  A debt obligation has been recorded in the form of notes for the proceeds as discussed above, which are owed to the Trusts.  The Company has also included its investment in the Trusts’ common securities in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

The Company has not provided financing or other support during the periods presented to the Trusts that it was not previously contractually obligated to provide.  The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the Trusts is equal to the total amount of the notes discussed above less the amounts of the Company’s investments in the Trusts’ common securities.  The net amount is the notes payable that the Trusts owe to third parties for their investments in the Trusts’ preferred securities.

 

The following is a tabular comparison of the liabilities the Company has recorded as a result of its involvement with the Trusts to the maximum exposure to loss the Company is subject to as a result of such involvement as of June 30, 2013:

 

 

 

Notes payable

 

Investment

 

Maximum

 

 

 

 

 

to Trusts

 

Balance

 

exposure to loss

 

Difference

 

Trust

 

$

36,083

 

$

1,083

 

$

35,000

 

$

 

Trust II

 

42,269

 

1,269

 

41,000

 

 

Trust III

 

41,238

 

1,238

 

40,000

 

 

 

 

$

119,590

 

$

3,590

 

$

116,000

 

$

 

 

The Company had no consolidated VIEs during the six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012.

 

7.              DERIVATIVES

 

The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources and duration of its debt funding and by using derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposure that arises from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the Company’s investments and borrowings.

 

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

 

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

 

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.  A portion of these changes is excluded from accumulated other comprehensive income as it is allocated to noncontrolling interests.  During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt.

 

The following table summarizes the terms of the Company’s 21 derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2013:

 

15



Table of Contents

 

Hedge Product

 

Current Notional
Amounts

 

Strike

 

Effective Dates

 

Maturity Dates

 

Swap Agreements

 

$4,873 - $97,211

 

2.79% - 6.98%

 

7/1/2009 - 5/6/2013

 

7/1/2014 - 4/1/2021

 

 

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments

 

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the condensed consolidated balance sheets:

 

 

 

Asset (Liability) Derivatives

 

 

 

June 30, 2013

 

December 31, 2012

 

Derivatives Designated as

 

Balance Sheet

 

Fair

 

Balance Sheet

 

Fair

 

Hedging Instruments:

 

Location

 

Value

 

Location

 

Value

 

Swap Agreements

 

Other assets

 

$

9,687

 

Other assets

 

$

 

Swap Agreements

 

Other liabilities

 

$

(5,037

)

Other liabilities

 

$

(15,228

)

 

Effect of Derivative Instruments

 

The tables below present the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented. No tax effect has been presented as the derivative instruments are held by the REIT:

 

 

 

Classification of

 

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

 

Type

 

Income (Expense)

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Swap Agreements

 

Interest expense

 

$

(2,129

)

$

(1,397

)

$

(4,282

)

$

(2,515

)

 

 

 

Gain (loss)

 

 

 

Gain (loss) reclassified

 

 

 

recognized in OCI

 

Location of amounts

 

from OCI

 

 

 

 

 

reclassified from OCI

 

For the Six Months

 

Type

 

June 30, 2013

 

into income

 

Ended June 30, 2013

 

Swap Agreements

 

$

15,222

 

Interest expense

 

$

(4,282

)

 

Credit-risk-related Contingent Features

 

The Company has agreements with some of its derivative counterparties that contain provisions pursuant to which, the Company could be declared in default of its derivative obligations if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender.

 

The Company also has an agreement with some of its derivative counterparties that incorporates the loan covenant provisions of the Company’s indebtedness with a lender affiliate of the derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with the loan covenant provisions would result in the Company being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement.

 

As of June 30, 2013, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to these agreements, was $5,166. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the Company had breached any of these provisions as of June 30, 2013, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $5,166.

 

8.              EXCHANGEABLE SENIOR NOTES

 

On June 21, 2013, the Operating Partnership issued $250,000 of its 2.375% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2033 at a 1.5% discount, or $3,750.  Costs incurred to issue the Notes were approximately $1,672.  These costs are being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over five years, which represents the estimated term based on the first available redemption date, and are included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.  The Notes are general unsecured senior

 

16



Table of Contents

 

obligations of the Operating Partnership and are fully guaranteed by the Company.  Interest is payable on January 1 and July 1 of each year beginning January 1, 2014, until the maturity date of July 1, 2033.  The Notes bear interest at 2.375% per annum and contain an exchange settlement feature, which provides that the Notes may, under certain circumstances, be exchangeable for cash (for the principal amount of the Notes) and, with respect to any excess exchange value, for cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock at the Company’s option.  The initial exchange rate of the Notes is approximately 17.96 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes.

 

The Operating Partnership may redeem the Notes at any time to preserve the Company’s status as a REIT.  In addition, on or after July 5, 2018, the Operating Partnership may redeem the Notes for cash, in whole or in part, at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, upon at least 30 days but not more than 60 days prior written notice to the holders of the Notes.  The holders of the Notes have the right to require the Operating Partnership to repurchase the Notes for cash, in whole or in part, on July 1 of the years 2018, 2023, and 2028, and upon the occurrence of certain designated events, in each case for a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest.  Certain events are considered “Events of Default,” as defined in the indenture governing the Notes, which may result in the accelerated maturity of the Notes.

 

GAAP requires entities with convertible debt instruments that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion to separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s economic interest cost.  The Company therefore accounts for the liability and equity components of the Notes separately.  The equity component is included in paid-in capital in stockholders’ equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheet, and the value of the equity component is treated as original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component.  The discount is being amortized as interest expense over the remaining period of the debt through its first redemption date, July 1, 2018. The effective interest rate on the liability component is 4.0%.

 

Information about the carrying amount of the equity component, the principal amount of the liability component, its unamortized discount and its net carrying amount were as follows for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

June 30, 2013

 

December 31, 2012

 

Carrying amount of equity component

 

$

14,496

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal amount of liability component

 

$

250,000

 

$

 

Unamortized discount - equity component

 

(14,383

)

 

Unamortized cash discount

 

(3,750

)

 

Net carrying amount of liability component

 

$

231,867

 

$

 

 

$87,663 of the Operating Partnership’s 3.625% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2027 (“the 2007 Notes”) were issued and outstanding prior to April 2012, when all of the outstanding 2007 Notes were surrendered for exchange.

 

The amount of interest cost recognized relating to the contractual interest rate and the amortization of the discount on the liability component of the Notes and the 2007 Notes was as follows for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Contractual interest

 

$

146

 

$

794

 

Amortization of discount on equity component

 

113

 

444

 

Total interest expense recognized

 

$

259

 

$

1,238

 

 

17



Table of Contents

 

9.              NONCONTROLLING INTEREST REPRESENTED BY PREFERRED OPERATING PARTNERSHIP UNITS

 

On June 15, 2007, the Operating Partnership entered into a Contribution Agreement with various limited partnerships affiliated with AAAAA Rent-A-Space to acquire ten self-storage facilities (the “Properties”) in exchange for 989,980 Preferred OP units of the Operating Partnership. The self-storage facilities are located in California and Hawaii.

 

On June 25, 2007, the Operating Partnership loaned the holders of the Preferred OP units $100,000. The note receivable bears interest at 4.85% and is due September 1, 2017. The loan is secured by the borrower’s Preferred OP units. The holders of the Preferred OP units can convert up to 114,500 Preferred OP units prior to the maturity date of the loan. If any redemption in excess of 114,500 Preferred OP units occurs prior to the maturity date, the holder of the Preferred OP units is required to repay the loan as of the date of that Preferred OP unit redemption. Preferred OP units are shown on the balance sheet net of the $100,000 loan because the borrower under the loan receivable is also the holder of the Preferred OP units.

 

The Operating Partnership entered into a Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (as subsequently amended, the “Partnership Agreement”) which provides for the designation and issuance of the Preferred OP units. The Preferred OP units will have priority over all other partnership interests of the Operating Partnership with respect to distributions and liquidation.

 

Under the Partnership Agreement, Preferred OP units in the amount of $115,000 bear a fixed priority return of 5% and have a fixed liquidation value of $115,000. The remaining balance participates in distributions with, and has a liquidation value equal to, that of the common OP units. The Preferred OP units became redeemable at the option of the holder on September 1, 2008, which redemption obligation may be satisfied, at the Company’s option, in cash or shares of its common stock.

 

GAAP requires a company to present ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the company in the consolidated financial statements within the equity section, but separate from the company’s equity.  It also requires the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations and requires changes in ownership interest to be accounted for similarly as equity transactions.  If noncontrolling interests are determined to be redeemable, they are to be carried at their redemption value as of the balance sheet date and reported as temporary equity.

 

The Company has evaluated the terms of the Preferred OP units and classifies the noncontrolling interest represented by the Preferred OP units as stockholders’ equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.  The Company will periodically evaluate individual noncontrolling interests for the ability to continue to recognize the noncontrolling amount as permanent equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.  Any noncontrolling interests that fail to qualify as permanent equity will be reclassified as temporary equity and adjusted to the greater of (1) the carrying amount, or (2) its redemption value as of the end of the period in which the determination is made.

 

10.       NONCONTROLLING INTEREST IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIP

 

The Company’s interest in its properties is held through the Operating Partnership. ESS Holding Business Trust I, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Company, through ESS Holding Business Trust II, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is also a limited partner of the Operating Partnership. Between its general partner and limited partner interests, the Company held a 96.6% majority ownership interest therein as of June 30, 2013. The remaining ownership interests in the Operating Partnership (including Preferred OP units) of 3.4% are held by certain former owners of assets acquired by the Operating Partnership.  As of June 30, 2013, the Operating Partnership had 2,898,510 common OP units outstanding.

 

The noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership represents common OP units that are not owned by the Company. In conjunction with the formation of the Company, and as a result of subsequent acquisitions, certain persons and entities contributing interests in properties to the Operating Partnership received limited partnership units in the form of OP units. Limited partners who received OP units in the formation transactions or in exchange for contributions for interests in properties have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem part or all of their common OP units for cash based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s common stock (ten-day average) at the time of the redemption. Alternatively, the Company may, at its option, elect to acquire those OP units in exchange for shares of its common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to anti-dilution adjustments provided in the Partnership Agreement.  The ten-day average closing stock price at June 30, 2013, was $42.00 and there were 2,898,510 common OP units outstanding. Assuming that all of the unit holders exercised their right to redeem all of their common OP units on June 30, 2013, and the

 

18



Table of Contents

 

Company elected to pay the noncontrolling members cash, the Company would have paid $121,737 in cash consideration to redeem the OP units.

 

GAAP requires a company to present ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the company in the consolidated financial statements within the equity section, but separate from the company’s equity.  It also requires the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations, and requires changes in ownership interest to be accounted for similarly as equity transactions.  If noncontrolling interests are determined to be redeemable, they are to be carried at their redemption value as of the balance sheet date and reported as temporary equity.

 

The Company has evaluated the terms of the common OP units and classifies the noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership as stockholders’ equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.  The Company will periodically evaluate individual noncontrolling interests for the ability to continue to recognize the noncontrolling amount as permanent equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.  Any noncontrolling interests that fail to qualify as permanent equity will be reclassified as temporary equity and adjusted to the greater of (1) the carrying amount, or (2) its redemption value as of the end of the period in which the determination is made.

 

11.       OTHER NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

Other noncontrolling interests represent the ownership interests of various third parties in two consolidated self-storage properties as of June 30, 2013.  One of these consolidated properties was undeveloped at June 30, 2013.  The ownership interests of the third-party owners range from 3.3% to 10.0%.  Other noncontrolling interests are included in the stockholders’ equity section of the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet.  The income or losses attributable to these third-party owners based on percentages outlined in the related agreements are reflected in net income allocated to Operating Partnership and other noncontrolling interests in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

 

In February 2013, the Company purchased one of its joint venture partner’s 1.7% capital interest and 17% profit interest in one of these consolidated properties for $200.  As a result, the Company’s capital interest percentage in this joint venture increased from 95% to 96.7%.  Since the Company retained its controlling financial interest in the subsidiary, this transaction was accounted for as an equity transaction.  The carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest was reduced to reflect the purchase and the difference between the price paid by the Company and the adjustment to the carrying value of the noncontrolling interest was recorded as an adjustment to equity attributable to the parent.

 

In May 2013, the Company purchased one of its joint venture partner’s 27.65% capital interest and 35% profit interest in a previously unconsolidated joint venture for $950.  The partner’s interest was reported in other noncontrolling interests prior to the purchase.  As a result of the acquisition, the property became wholly-owned by the Company.  Since the Company retained its controlling financial interest in the subsidiary, this transaction was accounted for as an equity transaction.  The carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest was reduced to zero to reflect the purchase and the difference between the price paid by the Company and the carrying value of the noncontrolling interest was recorded as an adjustment to equity attributable to the parent.

 

12.       EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF UNCONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE VENTURES — GAIN ON SALE OF REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND PURCHASE OF JOINT VENTURE PARTNERS’ INTERESTS

 

On February 13, 2013, the Company acquired its joint venture partner’s 48% equity interest in Extra Space of Eastern Avenue LLC (“Eastern Avenue”), which owned one self-storage property located in Maryland, for approximately $5,979. Prior to the acquisition, the remaining 52% interest was owned by the Company, which accounted for its investment in Eastern Avenue using the equity method. The Company recorded a non-cash gain of $2,215 related to this transaction, which represents the increase in fair value of the Company’s interest in Eastern Avenue from its formation to the acquisition date.

 

On February 13, 2013, the Company acquired its joint venture partner’s 61% equity interest in Extra Space of Montrose Avenue LLC (“Montrose”), which owned one self-storage property located in Illinois, for approximately $6,878. Prior to the acquisition, the remaining 39% interest was owned by the Company, which accounted for its investment in Montrose using the equity method. The Company recorded a non-cash gain of $341 related to this transaction, which represents the increase in fair value of the Company’s interest in the joint venture from its formation to the acquisition date.

 

On February 17, 2012, a joint venture in which the Company held a 40% equity interest sold its only self-storage property, which was located in New York. As a result of the sale, the joint venture was dissolved, and the Company received proceeds which resulted in a cash gain of $5,429.

 

19



Table of Contents

 

On January 15, 2012, the Company sold its 40% equity interest in U-Storage de Mexico S.A. and related entities to its joint venture partners for $4,841. The Company received cash of $1,492 and a note receivable of $3,349. No gain or loss was recorded on the sale. At June 30, 2013, the balance of the note receivable was $1,500.  The note receivable is due December 31, 2014.

 

13.       SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

The Company operates in three distinct segments: (1) rental operations; (2) tenant reinsurance; and (3) property management, acquisition and development. Management fees collected for wholly-owned properties are eliminated in consolidation.  Financial information for the Company’s business segments is presented below:

 

 

 

June 30, 2013

 

December 31, 2012

 

Balance Sheet

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in unconsolidated real estate ventures

 

 

 

 

 

Rental operations

 

$

101,698

 

$

106,313

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

 

 

 

 

Rental operations

 

$

3,024,448

 

$

2,981,927

 

Tenant reinsurance

 

34,524

 

27,645

 

Property management, acquisition and development

 

373,644

 

213,905

 

 

 

$

3,432,616

 

$

3,223,477

 

 

20



Table of Contents

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Statement of Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental operations

 

$

107,340

 

$

79,284

 

$

210,263

 

$

155,128

 

Tenant reinsurance

 

12,110

 

9,008

 

22,331

 

17,565

 

Property management, acquisition and development

 

6,796

 

6,659

 

12,974

 

13,245

 

 

 

126,246

 

94,951

 

245,568

 

185,938

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses, including depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental operations

 

54,904

 

41,701

 

110,872

 

83,826

 

Tenant reinsurance

 

2,202

 

1,424

 

4,112

 

3,272

 

Property management, acquisition and development

 

15,765

 

13,951

 

30,480

 

28,195

 

 

 

72,871

 

57,076

 

145,464

 

115,293

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental operations

 

52,436

 

37,583

 

99,391

 

71,302

 

Tenant reinsurance

 

9,908

 

7,584

 

18,219

 

14,293

 

Property management, acquisition and development

 

(8,969

)

(7,292

)

(17,506

)

(14,950

)

 

 

53,375

 

37,875

 

100,104

 

70,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of real estate assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental operations

 

800

 

 

800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental operations

 

(18,069

)

(15,590

)

(35,049

)

(33,374

)

Property management, acquisition and development

 

(293

)

(264

)

(679

)

(551

)

 

 

(18,362

)

(15,854

)

(35,728

)

(33,925

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash interest expense related to amortization of discount on equity component of exchangeable senior notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property management, acquisition and development

 

(113

)

 

(113

)

(444

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant reinsurance

 

4

 

3

 

8

 

6

 

Property management, acquisition and development

 

129

 

445

 

309

 

717

 

 

 

133

 

448

 

317

 

723

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income on note receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property management, acquisition and development

 

1,212

 

1,212

 

2,425

 

2,425

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental operations

 

2,914

 

2,698

 

5,537

 

4,994

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures - gain on sale of real estate assets and purchase of partners’ interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental operations

 

 

 

2,556

 

5,429

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant reinsurance

 

(6,379

)

(2,655

)

(9,245

)

(5,005

)

Property management, acquisition and development

 

3,521

 

1,021

 

4,379

 

2,421

 

 

 

(2,858

)

(1,634

)

(4,866

)

(2,584

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental operations

 

38,081

 

24,691

 

73,235

 

48,351

 

Tenant reinsurance

 

3,533

 

4,932

 

8,982

 

9,294

 

Property management, acquisition and development

 

(4,513

)

(4,878

)

(11,185

)

(10,382

)

 

 

$

37,101

 

$

24,745

 

$

71,032

 

$

47,263

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental operations

 

$

21,442

 

$

15,689

 

$

42,973

 

$

31,218

 

Property management, acquisition and development

 

1,343

 

937

 

2,837

 

1,932

 

 

 

$

22,785

 

$

16,626

 

$

45,810

 

$

33,150

 

 

21



Table of Contents

 

14.       COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

The Company has fully guaranteed a loan for the following unconsolidated joint venture:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

 

 

 

 

 

Loan

 

 

 

Fair Market

 

 

 

Date of

 

Maturity

 

Guaranteed

 

Value of

 

 

 

Guaranty

 

Date

 

Loan Amount

 

Assets

 

Extra Space of Sacramento One LLC

 

Apr-09

 

Apr-14

 

$

4,307

 

$

9,377

 

 

If the joint venture defaults on the loan, the Company may be forced to repay the loan. Repossessing and/or selling the self-storage facility and land that collateralize the loan could provide funds sufficient to reimburse the Company. The Company has recorded no liability in relation to this guarantee as of June 30, 2013, as the fair value of the guarantee was not material. The Company believes the risk of incurring a material loss as a result of having to perform on this guarantee is remote.

 

The Company has been involved in routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. As a result of these litigation matters, the Company recorded a liability of $1,800 during the year ended December 31, 2011, the balance of which is included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company does not believe that the loss related to these litigation matters will be in excess of the current amount accrued.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company was not involved in any material litigation nor, to its knowledge, was any material litigation threatened against it which, in the opinion of management, is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

15.       SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

On July 25, 2013, the Company acquired two properties located in Arizona for an approximate purchase price of $9,310.

 

22



Table of Contents

 

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Amounts in thousands, except property and share data

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our “Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” and the “Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” appearing elsewhere in this report and the “Consolidated Financial Statements,” “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. We make statements in this section that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. For a complete discussion of forward-looking statements, see the section in this Form 10-Q entitled “Statement on Forward-Looking Information.” (Amounts in thousands, except property and share data, unless otherwise stated).

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this report, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this report and the audited financial statements contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 describe the significant accounting policies essential to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. Preparation of our financial statements requires estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions that we have used are appropriate and correct based on information available at the time they were made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect our reported assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the period presented. If there are material differences between these estimates, judgments and assumptions and actual facts, our financial statements may be affected.

 

In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require our judgment in its application. There are areas in which our judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result, but there are some areas in which our judgment in selecting among available alternatives would produce a materially different result. See the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements that contain additional information regarding our accounting policies and other disclosures.

 

OVERVIEW

 

We are a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed REIT, formed to continue the business commenced in 1977 by our predecessor companies to own, operate, manage, acquire, develop and redevelop professionally managed self-storage properties. We derive our revenues from rents received from tenants under existing leases at each of our self-storage properties; management fees on the properties we manage for joint venture partners and unaffiliated third parties; and our tenant reinsurance program.  Our management fee is equal to approximately 6% of total revenues generated by the managed properties.

 

We operate in competitive markets, often where consumers have multiple self-storage properties from which to choose. Competition has impacted, and will continue to impact, our property results. We experience seasonal fluctuations in occupancy levels, with occupancy levels generally higher in the summer months due to increased moving activity. Our operating results depend materially on our ability to lease available self-storage units and actively manage rental rates, and on the ability of our tenants to make required rental payments. We believe we are able to respond quickly and effectively to changes in local, regional and national economic conditions by centrally adjusting rental rates through the combination of our revenue management team and our industry-leading technology systems.

 

We continue to evaluate a range of new initiatives and opportunities in order to enable us to maximize stockholder value. Our strategies to maximize stockholder value include the following:

 

·                      Maximize the performance of properties through strategic, efficient and proactive management. We pursue revenue-generating and expense-minimizing opportunities in our operations. Our revenue management team seeks

 

23



Table of Contents

 

to maximize revenue by responding to changing market conditions through our technology system’s ability to provide real-time, interactive rental rate and discount management. Our size allows us greater ability than the majority of our competitors to implement national and regional marketing programs, which we believe will attract more customers to our stores at a lower net cost.

 

·                      Acquire self-storage properties from strategic partners and third parties. Our acquisitions team continues to pursue the acquisition of single properties and multi-property portfolios that we believe can provide stockholder value. We have established a reputation as a reliable, ethical buyer, which we believe enhances our ability to negotiate and close acquisitions. In addition, we believe our status as an UPREIT enables flexibility when structuring deals.  We continue to see available acquisitions on which to bid and are seeing increasing prices.  However, we remain a disciplined buyer and look for acquisitions that will strengthen our portfolio and increase stockholder value.

 

·                      Expand our management business. Our management business enables us to generate increased revenues through management fees and expand our geographic footprint. This expanded footprint enables us to reduce our operating costs through economies of scale. In addition, we see our management business as a future acquisition pipeline. We pursue strategic relationships with owners whose properties would enhance our portfolio in the event an opportunity arises to acquire such properties.

 

PROPERTIES

 

As of June 30, 2013, we owned or had ownership interests in 732 operating self-storage properties. Of these properties, 453 were wholly-owned and 279 were held in joint ventures. In addition, we managed 242 properties for third parties, bringing the total number of operating properties that we owned and/or managed to 974. These properties are located in 35 states, Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico.  As of June 30, 2013, we owned and/or managed approximately 71.0 million square feet of space with approximately 649,000 units.

 

Our properties are generally situated in convenient, highly visible locations clustered around large population centers such as Atlanta, Baltimore/Washington, D.C., Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, Orlando, Philadelphia, Phoenix, St. Petersburg/Tampa and San Francisco/Oakland. These areas all enjoy above-average population growth and income levels. The clustering of assets around these population centers enables us to reduce our operating costs through economies of scale.  Our acquisitions and management business have given us an increased scale in many core markets as well as a foothold in many markets where we had no previous presence.

 

We consider a property to be in the lease-up stage after it has been issued a certificate of occupancy, but before it has achieved stabilization. We consider a property to be stabilized once it has achieved either an 80% occupancy rate for a full year measured as of January 1, or has been open for three years.

 

As of June 30, 2013, over 550,000 tenants were leasing storage units at our 974 operating properties,  primarily on a month-to-month basis, providing the flexibility to increase rental rates over time as markets permit.  Although leases are short-term in duration, the typical tenant tends to remain at our properties for an extended period of time. For properties that were stabilized as of June 30, 2013, the average length of stay was approximately 12.4 months. These existing tenants generally receive rate increases at least annually, for which no direct correlation has been drawn to our vacancy trends.  The average annual rent per square foot for our existing customers at these stabilized properties, net of discounts and bad debt, was $13.75 at June 30, 2013, compared to $13.24 at June 30, 2012.  This compares to our average annual rent per square foot for new leases of $14.42 at June 30, 2013, compared to $14.04 at June 30, 2012.  The average discounts, as a percentage of rental revenues, during these periods were 5.1% and 5.8%, respectively.

 

Our property portfolio is made up of different types of construction and building configurations depending on the site and the municipality where it is located. Most often sites are what we consider “hybrid” facilities, a mix of both drive-up buildings and multi-floor buildings. We have a number of multi-floor buildings with elevator access only, and a number of facilities featuring ground-floor access only.

 

24



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents additional information regarding the occupancy of our stabilized properties by state as of June 30, 2013 and 2012. The information as of June 30, 2012, is on a pro forma basis as though all the properties owned and/or managed at June 30, 2013, were under our control as of June 30, 2012.

 

Stabilized Property Data Based on Location

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Pro forma

 

Company

 

Pro forma

 

Company

 

Pro forma

 

Location 

 

Number of
Properties

 

Number of Units as
of June 30, 2013 (1)

 

Number of Units as
of June 30, 2012

 

Net Rentable
Square Feet as of
June 30, 2013 (2)

 

Net Rentable
Square Feet as of
June 30, 2012

 

Square Foot
Occupancy %
June 30, 2013

 

Square Foot
Occupancy %
June 30, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholly-Owned Properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alabama

 

4

 

1,972

 

1,966

 

233,617

 

233,799

 

91.3

%

89.5

%

Arizona

 

9

 

5,758

 

5,739

 

685,370

 

685,825

 

88.9

%

87.1

%

California

 

83

 

61,571

 

61,434

 

6,375,976

 

6,398,171

 

88.1

%

86.0

%

Colorado

 

11

 

5,287

 

5,255

 

655,295

 

660,845

 

94.7

%

94.4

%

Connecticut

 

4

 

2,643

 

2,648

 

257,788

 

257,818

 

93.2

%

94.4

%

Florida

 

46

 

31,527

 

31,529

 

3,423,850

 

3,421,867

 

88.3

%

84.9

%

Georgia

 

17

 

9,216

 

9,196

 

1,176,857

 

1,172,806

 

89.7

%

90.3

%

Hawaii

 

4

 

5,119

 

5,065

 

266,576

 

264,095

 

76.4

%

76.7

%

Illinois

 

13

 

9,079

 

8,979

 

945,602

 

946,534

 

95.0

%

91.8

%

Indiana

 

9

 

4,706

 

4,592

 

552,843

 

541,609

 

90.6

%

92.9

%

Kansas

 

1

 

504

 

505

 

50,360

 

50,340

 

93.1

%

92.5

%

Kentucky

 

4

 

2,153

 

2,150

 

254,015

 

254,115

 

92.9

%

93.3

%

Louisiana

 

2

 

1,413

 

1,414

 

150,015

 

150,215

 

92.7

%

91.1

%

Maryland

 

21

 

15,518

 

15,438

 

1,648,887

 

1,641,976

 

92.5

%

90.5

%

Massachusetts

 

32

 

19,502

 

19,396

 

1,988,046

 

1,989,086

 

94.8

%

91.3

%

Michigan

 

3

 

1,789

 

1,777

 

254,432

 

253,312

 

92.8

%

93.8

%

Missouri

 

6

 

3,154

 

3,154

 

372,687

 

375,337

 

91.2

%

92.9

%

Nevada

 

5

 

3,195

 

3,211

 

546,699

 

545,673

 

84.5

%

78.6

%

New Hampshire

 

2

 

1,003

 

1,005

 

125,773

 

125,473

 

91.0

%

89.5

%

New Jersey

 

45

 

35,356

 

35,339

 

3,420,819

 

3,422,537

 

93.5

%

92.0

%

New Mexico

 

3

 

1,575

 

1,582

 

216,154

 

215,784

 

87.8

%

87.2

%

New York

 

19

 

16,472

 

16,489

 

1,350,321

 

1,353,729

 

90.9

%

90.6

%

Ohio

 

18

 

9,648

 

9,619

 

1,263,311

 

1,247,571

 

91.5

%

88.8

%

Oregon

 

3

 

2,143

 

2,134

 

250,410

 

250,410

 

94.2

%

95.7

%

Pennsylvania

 

9

 

5,696

 

5,725

 

648,205

 

659,845

 

92.0

%

89.9

%

Rhode Island

 

2

 

1,174

 

1,183

 

131,391

 

130,996

 

89.4

%

89.0

%

South Carolina

 

5

 

2,699

 

2,703

 

327,880

 

327,725

 

91.3

%

91.0

%

Tennessee

 

10

 

5,449

 

5,424

 

744,710

 

740,085

 

89.3

%

86.9

%

Texas

 

26

 

16,733

 

16,699

 

1,961,765

 

1,959,898

 

91.8

%

89.4

%

Utah

 

7

 

3,542

 

3,527

 

445,296

 

444,892

 

93.2

%

92.7

%

Virginia

 

11

 

7,493

 

7,490

 

758,452

 

757,672

 

92.6

%

91.2

%

Washington

 

5

 

3,064

 

3,050

 

370,783

 

370,680

 

83.1

%

92.7

%

Total Wholly-Owned Stabilized

 

439

 

296,153

 

295,417

 

31,854,185

 

31,850,720

 

90.7

%

88.9

%

 

25



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Pro forma

 

Company

 

Pro forma

 

Company

 

Pro forma

 

Location 

 

Number of
Properties

 

Number of Units as
of June 30, 2013 (1)

 

Number of Units as
of June 30, 2012

 

Net Rentable
Square Feet as of
June 30, 2013 (2)

 

Net Rentable
Square Feet as of
June 30, 2012

 

Square Foot
Occupancy %
June 30, 2013

 

Square Foot
Occupancy %
June 30, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joint-Venture properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alabama

 

2

 

1,150

 

1,148

 

145,213

 

145,253

 

94.4

%

92.1

%

Arizona

 

7

 

4,219

 

4,203

 

492,841

 

494,071

 

87.6

%

88.7

%

California

 

78

 

56,646

 

56,341

 

5,821,052

 

5,822,550

 

91.9

%

91.2

%

Colorado

 

2

 

1,321

 

1,316

 

158,653

 

158,543

 

96.6

%

94.0

%

Connecticut

 

7

 

5,295

 

5,302

 

611,790

 

613,165

 

91.1

%

89.6

%

Delaware

 

1

 

589

 

589

 

71,730

 

72,080

 

91.7

%

95.2

%

Florida

 

19

 

15,153

 

15,299

 

1,520,903

 

1,540,366

 

89.4

%

88.4

%

Georgia

 

2

 

1,057

 

1,062

 

151,479

 

151,784

 

85.7

%

84.8

%

Illinois

 

5

 

3,442

 

3,357

 

365,283

 

362,048

 

94.7

%

93.0

%

Indiana

 

5

 

2,170

 

2,149

 

284,976

 

284,566

 

93.5

%

95.3

%

Kansas

 

2

 

842

 

835

 

109,485

 

108,995

 

84.6

%

86.9

%

Kentucky

 

4

 

2,220

 

2,289

 

258,645

 

270,793

 

91.2

%

92.0

%

Maryland

 

12

 

9,677

 

9,639

 

953,970

 

948,655

 

93.3

%

91.9

%

Massachusetts

 

13

 

6,886

 

6,879

 

782,236

 

777,782

 

93.9

%

89.2

%

Michigan

 

8

 

4,773

 

4,721

 

612,417

 

611,803

 

93.0

%

94.1

%

Missouri

 

1

 

531

 

531

 

61,225

 

61,275

 

95.7

%

94.7

%

Nevada

 

5

 

3,053

 

3,025

 

327,148

 

324,723

 

86.6

%

81.2

%

New Hampshire

 

3

 

1,306

 

1,312

 

136,724

 

137,344

 

90.2

%

90.4

%

New Jersey

 

16

 

12,945

 

12,877

 

1,358,342

 

1,356,786

 

91.3

%

89.6

%

New Mexico

 

7

 

3,605

 

3,608

 

398,350

 

398,414

 

84.9

%

85.5

%

New York

 

13

 

14,110

 

14,118

 

1,105,422

 

1,106,335

 

93.5

%

91.8

%

Ohio

 

8

 

3,954

 

3,928

 

531,312

 

532,637

 

92.4

%

91.1

%

Oregon

 

1

 

652

 

652

 

64,970

 

64,970

 

96.0

%

97.9

%

Pennsylvania

 

10

 

7,954

 

7,937

 

800,450

 

800,077

 

93.5

%

92.9

%

Tennessee

 

17

 

9,329

 

9,245

 

1,223,661

 

1,215,391

 

90.2

%

88.3

%

Texas

 

17

 

10,565

 

10,497

 

1,389,671

 

1,385,855

 

93.4

%

92.2

%

Virginia

 

13

 

9,348

 

9,336

 

994,226

 

993,269

 

93.3

%

92.6

%

Washington, DC

 

1

 

1,530

 

1,529

 

102,017

 

101,989

 

94.9

%

93.2

%

Total Joint-Venture Stabilized

 

279

 

194,322

 

193,724

 

20,834,191

 

20,841,519

 

91.8

%

90.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Managed Properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arizona

 

1

 

578

 

578

 

67,485

 

67,460

 

79.8

%

67.4

%

California

 

59

 

39,519

 

39,721

 

5,233,306

 

5,220,751

 

76.3

%

73.8

%

Colorado

 

7

 

3,462

 

3,467

 

387,701

 

387,863

 

95.3

%

94.9

%

Connecticut

 

1

 

482

 

484

 

61,480

 

61,480

 

85.8

%

81.4

%

Florida

 

24

 

13,909

 

13,909

 

1,659,897

 

1,654,604

 

80.9

%

79.2

%

Georgia

 

8

 

3,939

 

3,934

 

592,853

 

588,723

 

86.3

%

80.4

%

Hawaii

 

4

 

3,863

 

3,915

 

227,081

 

228,146

 

74.6

%

65.1

%

Illinois

 

10

 

5,899

 

5,882

 

628,080

 

631,028

 

90.2

%

87.9

%

Indiana

 

9

 

5,029

 

5,037

 

619,077

 

619,027

 

80.1

%

79.8

%

Kentucky

 

1

 

550

 

530

 

67,268

 

66,100

 

86.0

%

94.3

%

Louisiana

 

1

 

1,006

 

1,014

 

134,485

 

135,140

 

82.8

%

73.5

%

Maryland

 

7

 

4,232

 

4,229

 

444,385

 

448,635

 

94.0

%

90.5

%

Massachusetts

 

4

 

4,268

 

4,274

 

376,473

 

378,119

 

73.2

%

65.5

%

Mississippi

 

1

 

1,204

 

1,204

 

165,635

 

165,635

 

73.8

%

73.8

%

Missouri

 

2

 

1,213

 

1,206

 

152,841

 

151,776

 

91.7

%

84.1

%

Nevada

 

2

 

1,558

 

1,563

 

170,025

 

170,575

 

79.3

%

75.6

%

New Jersey

 

7

 

4,072

 

4,078

 

429,153

 

427,933

 

85.7

%

82.7

%

New Mexico

 

2

 

1,117

 

1,107

 

131,552

 

132,262

 

90.2

%

91.0

%

North Carolina

 

9

 

5,630

 

5,650

 

657,948

 

656,650

 

87.1

%

87.3

%

Ohio

 

10

 

3,514

 

3,514

 

489,284

 

489,284

 

76.2

%

76.2

%

Pennsylvania

 

16

 

7,814

 

7,838

 

927,351

 

929,319

 

85.8

%

84.8

%

South Carolina

 

2

 

1,329

 

1,329

 

164,815

 

164,865

 

95.5

%

94.3

%

Tennessee

 

3

 

1,508

 

1,498

 

207,670

 

206,135

 

89.6

%

88.8

%

Texas

 

17

 

8,611

 

8,407

 

1,151,443

 

1,149,643

 

82.7

%

80.9

%

Utah

 

1

 

795

 

794

 

136,005

 

135,755

 

82.8

%

79.9

%

Virginia

 

4

 

2,517

 

2,514

 

258,606

 

258,597

 

85.2

%

85.7

%

Washington

 

1

 

472

 

466

 

56,590

 

56,590

 

89.5

%

90.0

%

Washington, DC

 

2

 

1,262

 

1,263

 

112,409

 

112,459

 

96.0

%

93.3

%

Puerto Rico

 

4

 

2,722

 

2,722

 

287,637

 

287,637

 

80.6

%

80.6

%

Total Managed Stabilized

 

219

 

132,074

 

132,127

 

15,998,535

 

15,982,191

 

81.6

%

79.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Stabilized Properties

 

937

 

622,549

 

621,268

 

68,686,911

 

68,674,430

 

88.9

%

87.3

%

 


(1)       Represents unit count as of June 30, 2013, which may differ from unit count as of June 30, 2012 due to unit conversions or expansions.

 

(2)       Represents net rentable square feet as of June 30, 2013, which may differ from rentable square feet as of June 30, 2012 due to unit conversions or expansions.

 

26



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents additional information regarding the occupancy of our lease-up properties by state as of June 30, 2013 and 2012. The information as of June 30, 2012 is on a pro forma basis as though all the properties owned and/or managed at June 30, 2013 were under our control as of June 30, 2012.

 

Lease-up Property Data Based on Location

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Pro forma

 

Company

 

Pro forma

 

Company

 

Pro forma

 

Location 

 

Number of
Properties

 

Number of Units as
of June 30, 2013 (1)

 

Number of Units as
of June 30, 2012

 

Net Rentable
Square Feet as of
June 30, 2013 (2)

 

Net Rentable
Square Feet as of
June 30, 2012

 

Square Foot
Occupancy %
June 30, 2013

 

Square Foot
Occupancy %
June 30, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholly-Owned Properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arizona

 

1

 

632

 

633

 

71,355

 

71,355

 

70.5

%

54.5

%

California

 

3

 

2,147

 

2,170

 

206,785

 

206,243

 

85.8

%

57.5

%

Florida

 

4

 

3,174

 

3,271

 

330,730

 

330,930

 

90.8

%

67.2

%

Maryland

 

3

 

2,662

 

1,677

 

274,831

 

172,035

 

60.5

%

61.7

%

Massachusetts

 

1

 

684

 

690

 

72,280

 

73,020

 

82.7

%

76.2

%

New York

 

1

 

822

 

822

 

100,480

 

99,446

 

69.5

%

95.3

%

Utah

 

1

 

508

 

290

 

59,650

 

39,160

 

90.4

%

95.3

%

Total Wholly-Owned in Lease up

 

14

 

10,629

 

9,553

 

1,116,111

 

992,189

 

78.7

%

67.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Managed properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Colorado

 

2

 

1,035

 

1,038

 

117,384

 

117,384

 

82.7

%

64.0

%

Florida

 

6

 

4,120

 

4,147

 

403,233

 

401,783

 

74.9

%

63.0

%

Georgia

 

3

 

1,883

 

1,246

 

261,106

 

207,035

 

68.6

%

65.3

%

Maryland

 

3

 

2,255

 

1,829

 

215,085

 

170,295

 

61.3

%

39.5

%

Massachusetts

 

1

 

1,014

 

1,015

 

84,579

 

84,579

 

49.9

%

29.3

%

New York

 

1

 

920

 

920

 

97,023

 

97,084

 

41.0

%

0.0

%

North Carolina

 

2

 

909

 

942

 

96,446

 

96,421

 

89.5

%

59.8

%

Rhode Island

 

1

 

960

 

969

 

91,215

 

91,075

 

45.0

%

46.3

%

Texas

 

2

 

1,549

 

1,559

 

171,063

 

171,613

 

61.5

%

40.8

%

Utah

 

1

 

425

 

430

 

66,270

 

65,310

 

93.9

%

53.7

%

Virginia

 

1

 

614

 

 

55,405

 

 

31.5

%

0.0

%

Total Managed in Lease up

 

23

 

15,684

 

14,095

 

1,658,809

 

1,502,579

 

66.6

%

52.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Lease up Properties

 

37

 

26,313

 

23,648

 

2,774,920

 

2,494,768

 

71.4

%

58.4

%

 


(1) Represents unit count as of June 30, 2013, which may differ from unit count as of June 30, 2012 due to unit conversions or expansions.

 

(2) Represents net rentable square feet as of June 30, 2013, which may differ from rentable square feet as of June 30, 2012 due to unit conversions or expansions.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Comparison of the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

Overview

 

Results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, include the operations of 732 properties (454 of which were consolidated and 278 of which were in joint ventures accounted for using the equity method) compared to the results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, which included the operations of 703 properties (364 of which were consolidated and 339 of which were in joint ventures accounted for using the equity method).

 

Revenues

 

The following table presents information on revenues earned for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

For the Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

$ Change

 

% Change

 

2013

 

2012

 

$ Change

 

% Change

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property rental

 

$

107,340

 

$

79,284

 

$

28,056

 

35.4

%

$

210,263

 

$

155,128

 

$

55,135

 

35.5

%

Tenant reinsurance

 

12,110

 

9,008

 

3,102

 

34.4

%

22,331

 

17,565

 

4,766

 

27.1

%

Management fees

 

6,796

 

6,659

 

137

 

2.1

%

12,974

 

13,245

 

(271

)

(2.0

)%

Total revenues

 

$

126,246

 

$

94,951

 

$

31,295

 

33.0

%

$

245,568

 

$

185,938

 

$

59,630

 

32.1

%

 

27



Table of Contents

 

Property Rental — The increase in property rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 consisted primarily of increases of $21,740 and $42,763, respectively associated with acquisitions completed in 2013 and 2012.  We completed 91 property acquisitions in 2012 and closed on six property acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2013. In addition, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, increases of $5,591 and $10,878, respectively, resulted from increases in occupancy and rental rates to existing customers at our stabilized properties, compared to the same periods for the prior year.  Occupancy at our wholly-owned stabilized properties increased to 90.7% at June 30, 2013, as compared to 88.9% at June 30, 2012.  Rental rates to new tenants increased approximately 3% to 4% over the same period in the prior year.

 

Tenant Reinsurance — The increase in tenant reinsurance revenues was primarily due to the increase in the number of properties we owned and/or managed.  At June 30, 2013, we owned and/or managed 974 properties compared to 882 at June 30, 2012.  In addition, there was an increase of overall customer participation to 69.1% at June 30, 2013 compared to 66.6% at June 30, 2012.

 

Management Fees — Our taxable REIT subsidiary, Extra Space Management, Inc., manages properties owned by our joint ventures and third parties.  Management fees generally represent 6% of revenues generated from properties owned by third parties and unconsolidated joint ventures.  We also earn an asset management fee from one of our joint ventures equal to 0.50% of the total asset value of the venture, provided certain conditions are met.  At June 30, 2013, we managed 521 properties, compared to 519 properties at June 30, 2012.

 

Expenses

 

The following table presents information on expenses for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

For the Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

$ Change

 

% Change

 

2013

 

2012

 

$ Change

 

% Change

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operations

 

$

33,462

 

$

26,012

 

$

7,450

 

28.6

%

$

67,899

 

$

52,608

 

$

15,291

 

29.1

%

Tenant reinsurance

 

2,202

 

1,424

 

778

 

54.6

%

4,112

 

3,272

 

840

 

25.7

%

Acquisition related costs

 

683

 

469

 

214

 

45.6

%

1,135

 

1,078

 

57

 

5.3

%

General and administrative

 

13,739

 

12,545

 

1,194

 

9.5

%

26,508

 

25,185

 

1,323

 

5.3

%

Depreciation and amortization

 

22,785

 

16,626

 

6,159

 

37.0

%

45,810

 

33,150

 

12,660

 

38.2

%

Total expenses

 

$

72,871

 

$

57,076

 

$

15,795

 

27.7

%

$

145,464

 

$

115,293

 

$

30,171

 

26.2

%

 

Property OperationsThe increase in property operations expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 consisted primarily of increases associated with acquisitions completed in 2013 and 2012.  We completed 91 property acquisitions in 2012 and closed on six property acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

 

Tenant ReinsuranceTenant reinsurance expense represents the costs that are incurred to provide tenant reinsurance.  The increase was primarily due to the increase in the number of properties we owned and/or managed.  At June 30, 2013, we owned and/or managed 974 properties compared to 882 at June 30, 2012.  In addition, there was an increase of overall customer participation to 69.1% at June 30, 2013 compared to 66.6% at June 30, 2012.

 

Acquisition Related CostsAcquisition related costs relate to acquisition activities during the periods indicated.

 

General and AdministrativeGeneral and administrative expenses primarily include all expenses not directly related to the properties, including corporate payroll, travel and professional fees.  These expenses are recognized as incurred. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to the overall cost associated with the management of additional properties. At June 30, 2013, we owned and/or managed 974 properties, compared to 882 properties at June 30, 2012. We did not observe any material trends in specific payroll, travel or other expenses that contributed significantly to the increase in general and administrative expenses apart from the increase due to the management of additional properties.

 

Depreciation and AmortizationDepreciation and amortization expense increased as a result of the acquisition of new properties.  We acquired 91 properties during 2012 and six properties during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

 

28



Table of Contents

 

Other Revenues and Expenses

 

The following table presents information about other revenues and expenses for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

For the Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

$ Change

 

% Change

 

2013

 

2012

 

$ Change

 

% Change

 

Other income and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of real estate assets

 

$

800

 

$

 

$

800

 

 

$

800

 

$

 

$

800

 

 

Interest expense

 

(18,362

)

(15,854

)

(2,508

)

15.8

%

(35,728

)

(33,925

)

(1,803

)

5.3

%

Non-cash interest expense related to amortization of discount on equity component of exchangeable senior notes

 

(113

)

 

(113

)

100.0

%

(113

)

(444

)

331

 

(74.5

)%

Interest income

 

133

 

448

 

(315

)

(70.3

)%

317

 

723

 

(406

)

(56.2

)%

Interest income on note receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder

 

1,212

 

1,212

 

 

 

2,425

 

2,425

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures

 

2,914

 

2,698

 

216

 

8.0

%

5,537

 

4,994

 

543

 

10.9

%

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures - gain on sale of real estate assets and purchase of joint venture partners’ interests

 

 

 

 

 

2,556

 

5,429

 

(2,873

)

(52.9

)%

Income tax expense

 

(2,858

)

(1,634

)

(1,224

)

74.9

%

(4,866

)

(2,584

)

(2,282

)

88.3

%

Total other expense, net

 

$

(16,274

)

$

(13,130

)

$

(3,144

)

23.9

%

$

(29,072

)

$

(23,382

)

$

(5,690

)

24.3

%

 

Gain on Sale of Real Estate AssetsThe gain on sale of real estate assets recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was due to the condemnation of a portion of land at one self-storage property we own in California that resulted from eminent domain.

 

Interest ExpenseThe increase in interest expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily the result of increased debt.  At June 30, 2013 total debt, including our lines of credit was $1,779,572 compared to $1,308,003 at June 30, 2012.  This increase was offset by a lower combined weighted average interest rate of 3.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 4.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

 

Non-cash Interest Expense Related to Amortization of Discount on Equity Component of Exchangeable Senior NotesRepresents the amortization of the discount related to the equity component of the exchangeable senior notes issued by Extra Space Storage LP (our “Operating Partnership”), which reflects the effective interest rate relative to the carrying amount of the liability.  Our Operating Partnership had $87,663 of its 3.625% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2027 outstanding prior to April 2012, when all of these notes were surrendered for exchange, and issued $250,000 of its 2.375% Exchangeable Senior Notes in June 2013.

 

Interest IncomeInterest income represents amounts earned on cash and cash equivalents deposited with financial institutions and interest earned on notes receivable.  The decrease in interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was partially due to a decrease in notes receivable.  We held notes receivable, including notes from related parties, of $18,877 at June 30, 2012 compared to $7,220 at June 30, 2013.

 

Interest Income on Note Receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership Unit Holder — Represents interest on a $100,000 loan to the holders of the Series A Participating Redeemable Preferred units of our Operating Partnership (the “Preferred OP units”).

 

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Real Estate VenturesThe increase in equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was due primarily to increased revenues at our joint ventures as a result of increases in occupancy and rental rates to new and existing customers.  These increases were offset by decreases related to the purchase of our joint venture partners’ interests in joint ventures in July 2012, November 2012 and February 2013.

 

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures — Gain on Sale of Real Estate Assets and Purchase of Joint Venture Partners’ Interests — During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we acquired our partner’s equity interests in two joint ventures that each held one self-storage property.  As a result of the acquisitions, we recognized non-cash gains of $2,556, which represents the increase in fair values of our prior interests in the joint ventures from their formations to the acquisition dates.

 

In February 2012, a joint venture in which we held a 40% equity interest sold its only self-storage property.  As a result of the sale, the joint venture was dissolved, and we received proceeds which resulted in a cash gain of $5,429.

 

Income Tax Expense — For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the increase in income tax expense primarily related to increased tenant reinsurance income earned by our taxable REIT subsidiary and lower solar tax credits when compared to the same period of the prior year.

 

29



Table of Contents

 

Net Income Allocated to Noncontrolling Interests

 

The following table presents information on net income allocated to noncontrolling interests for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

For the Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

$ Change

 

% Change

 

2013

 

2012

 

$ Change

 

% Change

 

Net income allocated to noncontrolling interests:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income allocated to Preferred Operating Partnership noncontrolling interests

 

$

(1,745

)

$

(1,654

)

$

(91

)

5.5

%

$

(3,462

)

$

(3,303

)

$

(159

)

4.8

%

Net income allocated to Operating Partnership and other noncontrolling interests

 

(890

)

(678

)

(212

)

31.3

%

(1,679

)

(1,333

)

(346

)

26.0

%

Total income allocated to noncontrolling interests:

 

$

(2,635

)

$

(2,332

)

$

(303

)

13.0

%

$

(5,141

)

$

(4,636

)

$

(505

)

10.9

%

 

Net Income Allocated to Preferred Operating Partnership Noncontrolling InterestsIncome allocated to the Preferred OP units as of June 30, 2013 and 2012 equals the fixed distribution paid to the Preferred OP unit holder, plus approximately 0.9% of the remaining net income allocated after the adjustment for the fixed distribution paid.

 

Net Income Allocated to Operating Partnership and Other Noncontrolling InterestsIncome allocated to the Operating Partnership as of June 30, 2013 and 2012 represents approximately 2.4% and 2.9%, respectively, of net income after the allocation of the fixed distribution paid to the Preferred OP unit holder.  Income allocated to other noncontrolling interests represents the income allocated to partners in consolidated joint ventures.  The increase in net income allocated to operating partnership and other noncontrolling interests for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, when compared to the same period last year, was primarily the result of an increase in net income.

 

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS

 

Funds from Operations (“FFO”) provides relevant and meaningful information about our operating performance that is necessary, along with net income and cash flows, for an understanding of our operating results. We believe FFO is a meaningful disclosure as a supplement to net earnings. Net earnings assume that the values of real estate assets diminish predictably over time as reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses.  The values of real estate assets fluctuate due to market conditions and we believe FFO more accurately reflects the value of our real estate assets.  FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”) as net income computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses on sales of operating properties and impairment write downs of depreciable real estate assets, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis. We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be considered along with the reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements.

 

The computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to net cash flow from operating activities, as a measure of liquidity, or an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions.

 

30



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents the calculation of FFO for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net income attributable to common stockholders

 

$

34,466

 

$

22,413

 

$

65,891

 

$

42,627

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate depreciation

 

19,156

 

14,861

 

38,077

 

29,494

 

Amortization of intangibles

 

2,553

 

988

 

5,422

 

2,040

 

Gain on sale of real estate assets

 

(800

)

 

(800

)

 

Unconsolidated joint venture real estate depreciation and amortization

 

1,491

 

1,828

 

2,985

 

3,602

 

Unconsolidated joint venture gain on sale of real estate assets and purchase of partners’ interests

 

 

 

(2,556

)

(5,429

)

Distributions paid on Preferred Operating Partnership units

 

(1,438

)

(1,437

)

(2,875

)

(2,875

)

Income allocated to Operating Partnership noncontrolling interests

 

2,624

 

2,325

 

5,118

 

4,625

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funds from operations

 

$

58,052

 

$

40,978

 

$

111,262

 

$

74,084

 

 

SAME-STORE STABILIZED PROPERTY RESULTS

 

We consider our same-store stabilized portfolio to consist of only those properties that were wholly-owned at the beginning and at the end of the applicable periods presented that have achieved stabilization as of the first day of such period. The following table presents operating data for our same-store portfolio. We consider the following same-store presentation to be meaningful in regards to the properties shown below because these results provide information relating to property-level operating changes without the effects of acquisitions or completed developments.

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Percent

 

For the Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

Percent

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Change

 

2013

 

2012

 

Change

 

Same-store rental and tenant reinsurance revenues

 

$

85,806

 

$

79,627

 

7.8

%

$

168,624

 

$

156,646

 

7.6

%

Same-store operating and tenant reinsurance expenses

 

25,749

 

25,252

 

2.0

%

52,163

 

51,385

 

1.5

%

Same-store net operating income

 

$

60,057

 

$

54,375

 

10.4

%

$

116,461

 

$

105,261

 

10.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non same-store rental and tenant reinsurance revenues

 

$

33,644

 

$

8,665

 

288.3

%

$

63,970

 

$

16,047

 

298.6

%

Non same-store operating and tenant reinsurance expenses

 

$

9,915

 

$

2,184

 

354.0

%

$

19,848

 

$

4,495

 

341.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total rental and tenant reinsurance revenues

 

$

119,450

 

$

88,292

 

35.3

%

$

232,594

 

$

172,693

 

34.7

%

Total operating and tenant reinsurance expenses

 

$

35,664

 

$

27,436

 

30.0

%

$

72,011

 

$

55,880

 

28.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same-store square foot occupancy as of quarter end

 

90.8

%

89.0

%

 

 

90.8

%

89.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Properties included in same-store

 

344

 

344

 

 

 

344

 

344

 

 

 

 

The increases in same-store rental and tenant reinsurance revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the same periods ended June 30, 2012, were due primarily to an increase in occupancy of 1.8%, a decrease in discounts, and an average increase of 3% to 4% in incoming rates to new tenants.  The increases in same-store operating and tenant reinsurance expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 were primarily due to higher payroll, insurance and repairs and maintenance expenses.

 

CASH FLOWS

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities were $126,551 and $92,621, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The increase compared to the same period of the prior year primarily relates to increases in net income of $23,769, and depreciation and amortization of $12,660.

 

Cash used in investing activities was $67,066 and $65,915, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  The increase relates primarily to an increase in acquisition, development and redevelopment of real estate assets of $15,539 and a decrease in return of investment in real estate ventures of $1,848, offset by a decrease in restricted cash of $7,940 and a decrease in the purchase of notes receivable of $7,875.

 

Cash provided by financing activities was $116,662 and $132,312, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  The decrease related primarily to a decrease in proceeds from the sale of common stock of $226,698 and an increase in

 

31



Table of Contents

 

dividends paid on common stock of $32,389, offset by an increase in proceeds of $246,250 from the Operating Partnership’s issuance of its 2.375% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2033. Additionally, there was a decrease of $87,663 in cash used to repurchase the Operating Partnership’s 3.625% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2027, offset by a decrease in proceeds from notes payable and lines of credit of $58,521 and an increase of $29,721 in cash used for principal payments on notes payable and lines of credit.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

As of June 30, 2013, we had $206,932 available in cash and cash equivalents. We intend to use this cash to pay for future acquisitions, to repay debt and for general corporate purposes. We are required to distribute at least 90% of our net taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders on an annual basis to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

 

Our cash and cash equivalents are held in accounts managed by third party financial institutions and consist of invested cash and cash in our operating accounts. During 2012 and the first six months of 2013, we experienced no loss or lack of access to our cash or cash equivalents; however, there can be no assurance that access to our cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.

 

The following table presents information on our lines of credit for the periods indicated.  All of our lines of credit are guaranteed by us and secured by mortgages on certain real estate assets.

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Line of Credit

 

Amount
Drawn

 

Capacity

 

Interest Rate

 

Origination
Date

 

Maturity

 

Basis Rate

 

Notes

 

Credit Line 1

 

$

 

$

73,866

 

2.09

%

2/13/2009

 

2/13/2014

 

LIBOR plus 1.90%

 

(1)

 

Credit Line 2

 

 

85,000

 

2.09

%

6/4/2010

 

6/3/2016

 

LIBOR plus 1.90%

 

(2)

 

Credit Line 3

 

 

40,000

 

2.39

%

11/16/2010

 

11/16/2013

 

LIBOR plus 2.20%

 

(3)

 

Credit Line 4

 

 

50,000

 

2.34

%

4/29/2011

 

5/1/2014

 

LIBOR plus 2.15%

 

(3)

 

 

 

$

 

$

248,866

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1) One year extension available

(2) One two-year extension available

(3) Two one-year extensions available

 

As of June 30, 2013, we had $1,779,572 face value of debt, resulting in a debt to total market capitalization ratio of 26.9%.  As of June 30, 2013, the ratio of total fixed-rate debt and other instruments to total debt was 84.7% (including $830,950 on which we have interest rate swaps that have been included as fixed-rate debt). The weighted average interest rate of the total of fixed- and variable-rate debt at June 30, 2013 was 3.8%.  Certain of our real estate assets are pledged as collateral for our debt. We are subject to certain restrictive covenants relating to our outstanding debt. We were in compliance with all financial covenants at June 30, 2013.

 

We expect to fund our short-term liquidity requirements, including operating expenses, recurring capital expenditures, dividends to stockholders, distributions to holders of OP units and interest on our outstanding indebtedness, out of our operating cash flow, cash on hand and borrowings under our lines of credit. In addition, we are pursuing additional term loans secured by unencumbered properties.

 

Our liquidity needs consist primarily of cash distributions to stockholders, property acquisitions, principal payments under our borrowings and non-recurring capital expenditures. We may from time to time seek to retire or repurchase shares of common stock or other securities in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors.  In addition, we evaluate, on an ongoing basis, the merits of strategic acquisitions and other relationships, which may require us to raise additional funds. We do not expect that our operating cash flow or cash balances will be sufficient to fund our liquidity needs and instead expect to fund such needs out of additional borrowings of secured or unsecured indebtedness, joint ventures with third parties, and from the proceeds of public and private offerings of equity and debt. Additional capital may not be available on terms favorable to us or at all. Any additional issuance of equity or equity-linked securities may result in dilution to our stockholders. In addition, any new securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of our common stock. We may also use OP units as currency to fund acquisitions from self-storage owners who desire tax-deferral in their exiting transactions.

 

32



Table of Contents

 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

Except as disclosed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, we do not currently have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purposes entities, which typically are established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Further, except as disclosed in the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities, nor do we have any commitments or intent to provide funding to any such entities. Accordingly, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in these relationships.

 

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

 

The following table presents information on payments due by period as of June 30, 2013:

 

 

 

Payments due by Period:

 

 

 

 

 

Less Than

 

 

 

 

 

After

 

 

 

Total

 

1 Year

 

1-3 Years

 

3-5 Years

 

5 Years

 

Operating leases

 

$

65,517

 

$

7,340

 

$

10,806

 

$

5,914

 

$

41,457

 

Notes payable, notes payable to trusts and lines of credit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

396,446

 

66,051

 

116,117

 

75,863

 

138,415

 

Principal

 

1,779,572

 

90,016

 

360,908

 

674,628

 

654,020

 

Total contractual obligations

 

$

2,241,535

 

$

163,407

 

$

487,831

 

$

756,405

 

$

833,892

 

 

The operating leases above include minimum future lease payments on ground leases for 17 of our operating properties as well as leases of our corporate offices.  Two ground leases include additional contingent rental payments based on the level of revenue achieved at the property.

 

At June 30, 2013, the weighted-average interest rate for all fixed-rate loans was 4.1%, and the weighted-average interest rate for all variable-rate loans was 2.3%.

 

FINANCING STRATEGY

 

We will continue to employ leverage in our capital structure in amounts reviewed from time to time by our board of directors. Although our board of directors has not adopted a policy that limits the total amount of indebtedness that we may incur, we will consider a number of factors in evaluating our level of indebtedness from time to time, as well as the amount of such indebtedness that will be either fixed- or variable-rate. In making financing decisions, we will consider factors including but not limited to:

 

·                       the interest rate of the proposed financing;

 

·                       the extent to which the financing impacts flexibility in managing our properties;

 

·                       prepayment penalties and restrictions on refinancing;

 

·                       the purchase price of properties acquired with debt financing;

 

·                       long-term objectives with respect to the financing;

 

·                       target investment returns;

 

·                       the ability of particular properties, and our company as a whole, to generate cash flow sufficient to cover expected debt service payments;

 

·                       overall level of consolidated indebtedness;

 

·                       timing of debt and lease maturities;

 

33



Table of Contents

 

·                       provisions that require recourse and cross-collateralization;

 

·                       corporate credit ratios including debt service coverage, debt to total capitalization and debt to undepreciated assets; and

 

·                       the overall ratio of fixed- and variable-rate debt.

 

Our indebtedness may be recourse, non-recourse or cross-collateralized. If the indebtedness is non-recourse, the collateral will be limited to the particular properties to which the indebtedness relates. In addition, we may invest in properties subject to existing loans collateralized by mortgages or similar liens on our properties, or we may refinance properties acquired on a leveraged basis. We may use the proceeds from any borrowings to refinance existing indebtedness, to refinance investments, including the redevelopment of existing properties, for general working capital or to purchase additional interests in partnerships or joint ventures or for other purposes when we believe it is advisable.

 

SEASONALITY

 

The self-storage business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. A greater portion of revenues and profits are realized from May through September. Historically, our highest level of occupancy has been at the end of July, while our lowest level of occupancy has been in late February and early March. Results for any quarter may not be indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full fiscal year.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Market Risk

 

Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our future income, cash flows and fair values of financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond our control.

 

As of June 30, 2013, we had approximately $1.8 billion in total debt, of which approximately $271.6 million was subject to variable interest rates (excluding debt with interest rate swaps). If the applicable LIBOR were to change by 100 basis points, the effect on interest expense on the variable-rate debt (excluding variable-rate debt with interest rate floors) would affect future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.3 million annually.

 

Interest rate risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall economic activity that could occur. Further, in the event of a change of that magnitude, we may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure.

 

The fair values of our fixed-rate assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

June 30, 2013

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

Fair

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

Carrying

 

 

 

Value

 

Value

 

Value

 

Value

 

Note receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder

 

$

104,276

 

$

100,000

 

$

108,138

 

$

100,000

 

Fixed rate notes payable and notes payable to trusts

 

$

1,258,731

 

$

1,257,954

 

$

1,342,957

 

$

1,275,605

 

Exchangeable senior notes

 

$

231,250

 

$

250,000

 

$

 

$

 

 

The fair value of our note receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder was based on the discounted estimated future cash flows of the note (categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy); the discount rate used approximated the

 

34



Table of Contents

 

current market rate for loans with similar maturities and credit quality.  The fair values of our exchangeable senior notes, fixed-rate notes payable and notes payable to trusts were estimated using the discounted estimated future cash payments to be made on such debt (categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy); the discount rates used approximated current market rates for loans, or groups of loans, with similar maturities and credit quality.  Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment.  Settlement of such fair value amounts may not be possible and may not be a prudent management decision.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

(1)                                 Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide a reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and in reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

 

We have a disclosure committee that is responsible to ensure that all disclosures made by the Company to its security holders or to the investment community will be accurate and complete and fairly present the Company’s financial condition and results of operations in all material respects, and are made on a timely basis as required by applicable laws, regulations and stock exchange requirements.

 

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this report.

 

(2)                                 Changes in internal control over financial reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during our most recent quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

We are involved in various litigation and proceedings in the ordinary course of business. We are not a party to any material litigation or legal proceedings, or to the best of our knowledge, any threatened litigation or legal proceedings, which, in the opinion of management, are expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations either individually or in the aggregate.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

None.

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

 

None.

 

35



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not Applicable.

 

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

 

4.1

 

Indenture, dated June 21, 2013, among Extra Space Storage LP, as issuer, Extra Space Storage Inc., as guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, including the form of 2.375% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2033 and the form of guarantee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-K filed on June 21, 2013).

 

 

 

10.1

 

Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 21, 2013, among Extra Space Storage LP, Extra Space Storage Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on June 21, 2013).

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.1*

 

Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

101

 

The following materials from Extra Space Storage Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 are formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (1) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (2) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (3) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (4) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity, (5) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (6) notes to these financial statements.

 


* These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this quarterly report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Extra Space Storage Inc., whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  Signed originals of these certifications have been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

36



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.

 

Registrant

 

 

Date: August 8, 2013

/s/ Spencer F. Kirk

 

Spencer F. Kirk

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

Date: August 8, 2013

/s/ P. Scott Stubbs

 

P. Scott Stubbs

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

37