FIRST BANCSHARES INC /MS/ - Quarter Report: 2011 September (Form 10-Q)

U. S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED:

September 30, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER:

33-94288

THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

(EXACT NAME OF ISSUER AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

MISSISSIPPI		64-0862173
STATE OF INCORPORATION)		(I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)

6480 U.S. HIGHWAY 98 WEST
HATTIESBURG, MISSISSIPPI		39402
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL		(ZIP CODE)
EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

(601) 268-8998

(ISSUER'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

NONE

(FORMER NAME, ADDRESS AND FISCAL YEAR, IF CHANGED SINCE LAST REPORT)

INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE ISSUER: (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS.

YES x NO ¨

INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A LARGE ACCELERATED FILER, AN ACCELERATED FILER, OR A NON-ACCELERATED FILER. SEE DEFINITION OF “ACCELERATED FILER AND LARGE ACCELERATED FILER” IN RULE 12B-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

LARGE ACCELERATED FILER ¨

ACCELERATED FILER ¨

NON-ACCELERATED FILER

ON September 30, 2011, 3,066,072 SHARES OF THE ISSUER'S COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $1.00 PER SHARE, WERE ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING.

TRANSITIONAL DISCLOSURE FORMAT (CHECK ONE):

YES ¨ NO x

INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A SHELL COMPANY (AS DEFINED IN RULE 12B-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT): YES ¨ NO x

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM NO. 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

($ amounts in thousands)

	(Unaudited)
	September 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	14,004		$	12,450
Interest-bearing deposits with banks		119,799			12,443
Federal funds sold		485			9,083

Total cash and cash equivalents		134,288			33,976

Securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost		3			3
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value		133,459			104,534
Other securities		2,602			2,599

Total securities		136,064			107,136

Loans held for sale		3,958			2,938
Loans		385,428			329,635
Allowance for loan losses		(4,278	)		(4,617	)

Loans, net		385,108			327,956

Premises and equipment		23,129			14,994
Interest receivable		2,320			2,023
Cash surrender value of life insurance		6,224			6,084
Goodwill		9,431			702
Other assets		13,356			10,174

	$	709,920		$	503,045

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	106,790		$	48,312
Interest-bearing		495,152			348,167

TOTAL DEPOSITS		601,942			396,479

Interest payable		340			411
Borrowed funds		27,051			30,107
Subordinated debentures		10,310			10,310
Other liabilities		10,707			8,639

TOTAL LIABILITIES		650,350			445,946

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, no par value, $1,000 per share liquidation, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 17,123 issued and outstanding at Sept. 30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010		16,939			16,939
Common stock, par value $1 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 3,092,566 and 3,058,716 shares issued at Sept. 30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010		3,093			3,059
Additional paid-in capital		23,473			23,419
Retained earnings		16,037			14,723
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		492			(577	)
Treasury stock, at cost, 26,494 shares at
Sept. 30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010		(464	)		(464	)

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		59,570			57,099
	$	709,920		$	503,045

THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

($ amounts in thousands, except earnings and dividends per share)

	(unaudited)
	Three Months						Nine Months
	Ended						Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010

INTEREST INCOME:
Interest and fees on loans	$	5,165		$	5,105		$	15,296		$	15,234
Interest and dividends on securities:
Taxable interest and dividends		452			426			1,290			1,512
Tax exempt interest		366			312			1,029			909
Interest on federal funds sold		16			6			58			22

TOTAL INTEREST INCOME		5,999			5,849			17,673			17,677

INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest on deposits		963			1,289			3,271			4,512
Interest on borrowed funds		304			334			908			1,070

TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE		1,267			1,623			4,179			5,582

NET INTEREST INCOME		4,732			4,226			13,494			12,095

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		230			372			883			754
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		4,502			3,854			12,611			11,341

OTHER INCOME:
Service charge on deposit accounts		632			600			1,758			1,786
Other service charges and fees		456			654			1,273			1,393
Gain on sale of investment securities		-			-			-			51
Impairment loss on securities:
Total other-than-temporary impairment (loss)		(52	)		(282	)		(141	)		(565	)
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income		52			82			137			216
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings		-			(200	)		(4	)		(349	)

TOTAL OTHER INCOME		1,088			1,054			3,027			2,881

OTHER EXPENSES:
Salaries and employee benefits		2,391			2,235			6,864			6,507
Occupancy and equipment		534			392			1,466			1,458
Other		1,554			1,398			4,966			3,653

TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES		4,479			4,025			13,296			11,618

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		1,111			883			2,342			2,604

INCOME TAXES		365			261			425			797

NET INCOME		746			622			1,917			1,807

PREFERRED DIVIDENDS		86			61			257			186

PREFERRED STOCK ACCRETION		-			14			-			42

NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	660		$	547		$	1,660		$	1,579

NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:
BASIC	$	.22		$	.18		$	.54		$	.52
DILUTED		.21			.18			.54			.52
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE – COMMON		.0375			.05			.1125			.15

THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(unaudited)

($ in thousands)

	Common Stock		Preferred Stock		Stock Warrants		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Compre- hensive Income(Loss)			Treasury Stock			Total
Balance,
January 1, 2010	$	3,046	$	4,773	$	-	$	23,418		$	12,944		$	(101	)	$	(464	)	$	43,616
Net income		-		-		-		-			1,807			-			-			1,807
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on available- for-sale securities, net of tax		-		-		-		-			-			234			-			234
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)on derivative, net of tax		-		-		-		-			-			13			-			13
Accretion of preferred stock discount		-		42		-		-			(42	)		-			-			-
Dividends on preferred stock		-		-		-		-			(186	)		-			-			(186	)
Dividends on common stock, $.15 per share		-		-		-		-			(454	)		-			-			(454	)
Issuance of preferred stock		-		12,124		-		-			-			-			-			12,124
Restricted stock grant		-		-		-		6			-			-			-			6
Balance, Sept. 30, 2010	$	3,046	$	16,939	$	-	$	23,424		$	14,069		$	146		$	(464	)	$	57,160

Balance,
January 1, 2011	$	3,059	$	16,939	$	284	$	23,135		$	14,723		$	(577	)	$	(464	)	$	57,099
Net income		-		-		-		-			1,917			-			-			1,917
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)on available- for-sale securities, net of tax		-		-		-		-			-			1,035			-			1,035
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)on derivative, net of tax		-		-		-		-			-			34			-			34
Dividends on preferred stock		-		-		-		-			(257	)		-			-			(257	)
Dividends on common stock, $.1125 per Share		-		-		-		-			(346	)		-			-			(346	)
Restricted stock grant		34		-		-		(34	)		-			-			-			-
Compensation Expense		-		-		-		88			-			-			-			88
Balance, Sept. 30, 2011	$	3,093	$	16,939	$	284	$	23,189		$	16,037		$	492		$	(464	)	$	59,570

THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

($ Amounts in Thousands)

	(Unaudited)
	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
NET INCOME		1,917			1,807
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		821			880
Impairment loss on securities		4			349
Gain on sale of securities		-			(51	)
Provision for loan losses		883			754
Loss on sale/writedown of ORE		127			115
Restricted stock expense		88			5
Increase in cash value of life insurance		(140	)		(178	)
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends		(3	)		(3	)
Changes in:
Interest receivable		(297	)		448
Loans held for sale, net		(1,020	)		(2,591	)
Interest payable		(71	)		(257	)
Other, net		2,264			877

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		4,573			2,155

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Maturities and calls of securities available- for-sale		36,901			47,506
Purchases of securities available-for-sale		(64,876	)		(31,160	)
Decrease in other securities		-			324
Proceeds from sale of securities available-for-sale		-			1,051
Net increase in loans		(13,854	)		(18,804	)
Net additions in premises and equipment		(1,189	)		(839	)
Cash received from acquisition		116,143			-

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES		73,125			(1,922	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase in deposits		26,267			13,912
Net decrease in borrowed funds		(3,056	)		(1,412	)
Dividends paid on common stock		(340	)		(454	)
Dividends paid on preferred stock		(257	)		(186	)
Net proceeds from issuance and redemption of preferred stock		-			12,123
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		22,614			23,983

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		100,312			24,216
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		33,976			15,991
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	134,288		$	40,207

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:

CASH PAYMENTS FOR INTEREST	$	4,250		$	5,839
CASH PAYMENTS FOR INCOME TAXES		788			1,089
LOANS TRANSFERRED TO OTHER REAL ESTATE		2,957			3,162
ISSUANCE OF RESTRICTED STOCK GRANTS		34			-

THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

NOTE A — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements and with the instructions to Form 10-Q of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. For further information, please refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

NOTE B — SUMMARY OF ORGANIZATION

The First Bancshares, Inc., Hattiesburg, Mississippi (the "Company"), was incorporated June 23, 1995, under the laws of the State of Mississippi for the purpose of operating as a bank holding company. The Company’s primary asset is its interest in its wholly-owned subsidiary, The First, A National Banking Association (the Bank).

At September 30, 2011, the Company had approximately $709.9 million in assets, $389.4 million in loans,$601.9 million in deposits, and $59.6 million in stockholders' equity. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company reported a net income of $1.9 million ($1.7 million applicable to common stockholders).

In the first, second and third quarters of 2011, the Company declared and paid a dividend of $.0375 per common share for each quarter.

NOTE C – BUSINESS COMBINATION

On September 16, 2011 the Company completed the purchase of seven (7) branches located on the Mississippi Gulf Coast and one (1) branch located in Bogalusa, Louisiana from Whitney National Bank and Hancock Bank of Louisiana (the “Whitney branches”). As part of the agreement, the Company purchased loans of $46.8 million and assumed deposit liabilities of $179.3 million, and purchased the related fixed assets and cash of the branches. The Company operates the acquired bank branches under the name The First, A National Banking Association. The acquisition allowed the Company to expand its presence in South Mississippi as well as enter a new market in Louisiana. The Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income include the results of operations of the Whitney branches from the closing date of the acquisition.

In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $8.7 million of goodwill and $2.4 million of core deposit intangible. The core deposit intangible of $2.4 million will be expensed over 10 years. The recorded goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.

The Company acquired the $46.8 million loan portfolio at a fair value discount of $.7 million. The discount represents expected credit losses, adjustments to market interest rates and liquidity adjustments. The performing loan portfolio fair value estimate was $.1 million and the impaired loan portfolio fair value estimate was $.6 million.

The amounts of the acquired identifiable assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date were as follows (dollars in thousands):

Purchase price:
Cash	$	9,100
Total purchase price		9,100
Identifiable assets:
Cash		125,243
Loans and leases		46,118
Core deposit intangible		2,402
Personal and real property		7,481
Other assets		25
Total assets		181,270
Liabilities and equity:
Deposits		179,196
Other liabilities		1,703
Total liabilities		180,899
Net assets acquired		371
Goodwill resulting from acquisition	$	8,729

In the third quarter interest income of $104,000 was recorded on loans acquired in the Whitney branch acquisition. The outstanding principal balance and the carrying amount of these loans included in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2011 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Outstanding principal balance		$	46,622
Carrying amount			45,950

All loans obtained in the acquisition of the Whitney branches reflect no specific evidence of credit deterioration and very low probability that the Company would be unable to collect all contractually required principal and interest payments.

The amounts of the Whitney branch revenue and earnings included in the Company’s consolidated income statement for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 reflect only amounts from the acquisition date of September 16, 2011 through the quarter end September 30, 2011. Historical financial information related to each loan and deposit acquired was impractical to determine due to retrospective application requiring significant estimates of amounts that cannot be independently substantiated. Further, we believe it is impossible to distinguish objectively information about those estimates that provides evidence of circumstances that existed on the dates at which those amounts would be recognized and measured under retrospective application.

Acquisition-related expenses associated with the acquisition of the Whitney branches were $339,000 and $412,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Such costs included principally system conversion and integrating operations charges which have been expensed as incurred.

NOTE D – PREFERRED STOCK AND WARRANT

On February 6, 2009, as part of the U.S. Department of Treasury’s (“Treasury”) Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”), the Company received a $5.0 million equity investment by issuing 5 thousand shares of Series A, no par value preferred stock to the Treasury pursuant to a Letter Agreement and Securities Purchase Agreement that was previously disclosed by the Company. The Company also issued a warrant to the Treasury allowing it to purchase 54,705 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $13.71. The warrant can be exercised immediately and has a term of 10 years.

The non-voting Series A preferred shares issued, with a liquidation preference of $1 thousand per share, will pay a cumulative cash dividend quarterly at 5% per annum during the first five years the preferred shares are outstanding, resetting to 9% thereafter if not redeemed. The CPP also includes certain restrictions on dividend payments of the Company’s lower ranking equity and the ability to purchase its outstanding common shares.

The Company allocated the proceeds received from the Treasury, net of transaction costs, on a pro rata basis to the Series A preferred stock and the warrant based on their relative fair values. The Company assigned $.3 million and $4.7 million to the warrant and the Series A preferred stock, respectively. The resulting discount on the Series A preferred stock was fully accreted up to the $5.0 million liquidation amount in 2010 at the time of the exchange that is described in the following paragraphs.

On September 29, 2010, and pursuant to the terms of the letter agreement between the Company and the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), the Company closed a transaction whereby Treasury exchanged its 5,000 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series UST, (the “CPP Preferred Shares”) for 5,000 shares of a new series of preferred stock designated Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series CD (the “CDCI Preferred Shares”). On the same day, and pursuant to the terms of the letter agreement between the Company and Treasury, the Company issued an additional 12,123 CDCI Preferred Shares to Treasury for a purchase price of $12,123,000. As a result of the CDCI Transactions, the Company is no longer participating in the TARP Capital Purchase Program being administered by Treasury and is now participating in Treasury’s TARP Community Development Capital Initiative (the “CDCI”). The terms of the CDCI Transactions are more fully set forth in the Exchange Letter Agreement and the Purchase Letter Agreement.

The Letter Agreement, pursuant to which the Preferred Shares were exchanged, contains limitations on the payment of dividends on the common stock to no more than 100% of the aggregate per share dividend and distributions for the immediate prior fiscal year (dividends of $0.15 per share were declared and paid in 2010) and on the Company’s ability to repurchase its common stock, and continues to subject the Company to certain of the executive compensation limitations included in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA), as previously disclosed by the Company.

The most significant difference in terms between the CDCI Preferred Shares and the CPP Preferred Shares is the dividend rate applicable to each. The CPP Preferred Shares entitled the holder to an annual dividend of 5% of the liquidation value of the shares, payable quarterly in arrears; by contrast, the CDCI Preferred Shares entitle the holder to an annual dividend of 2% of the liquidation value of the shares, payable quarterly in arrears. Other differences in terms between the CDCI Preferred Shares and the CPP Preferred Shares, including, without limitation, the restrictions on common stock dividends and on redemption of common stock and other securities exist. The terms of the CDCI Preferred Shares are more fully set forth in the Articles of Amendment creating the CDCI Preferred Shares, which Articles of Amendment were filed with the Mississippi Secretary of State on September 27, 2010.

As a condition to participation in the CDCI, the Company was required to obtain certification as a Community Development Financial Institution (a “CDFI”) from Treasury’s Community Development Financial Fund. On September 28, 2010, the Company was notified that its application for CDFI certification had been approved. In order to become certified and maintain its certification as a CDFI, the Company is required to meet the CDFI eligibility requirements set forth in 12 C.F.R. 1805.201(b).

NOTE E — EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS

Basic per share data is calculated based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted per share data includes any dilution from potential common stock outstanding, such as stock options.

	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2011
	Net Income		Shares		Per
	(Numerator)		(Denominator)		Share Data

Basic per share	$	660,000		3,066,072	$	.22

Effect of dilutive shares: Restricted stock grants				9,379

Diluted per share	$	660,000		3,075,451	$	.21

	For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011
	Net Income		Shares		Per
	(Numerator)		(Denominator)		Share Data

Basic per share	$	1,660,000		3,062,311	$	.54

Effect of dilutive shares: Restricted stock grants				9,379

Diluted per share	$	1,660,000		3,071,690	$	.54

	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2010
	Net Income		Shares		Per
	(Numerator)		(Denominator)		Share Data

Basic per share	$	547,000		3,019,869	$	.18

Diluted per share	$	547,000		3,020,558	$	.18

	For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2010
	Net Income		Shares		Per
	(Numerator)		(Denominator)		Share Data

Basic per share	$	1,579,000		3,019,869	$	.52

Diluted per share	$	1,579,000		3,020,558	$	.52

The Company granted 33,850 shares of restricted stock in the first quarter of 2011.

NOTE F — COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following table discloses Comprehensive Income for the periods reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income:

(In thousands)

	Three Months						Nine Months
	Ended						Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010

Net Income	$	746		$	622		$	1,917		$	1,807

Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains (losses)on available-for-sale securities during the period		(103	)		207			1,035			234
Unrealized gain(loss)on derivative carried at fair value during the period		51			(12	)		34			13

Comprehensive Income	$	694		$	817		$	2,986		$	2,054

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities during the period, net of tax	$	(103	)	$	207		$	1,035		$	234

Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative carried at fair value during the period, net of tax		51			(12	)		34			13

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income(Loss) beginning of period		544			(49	)		(577	)		(101	)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), end of period	$	492		$	146		$	492		$	146

NOTE G — FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The Company groups its financial assets measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

Level 1:

Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2:

Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities which use observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets and liabilities

Level 3:

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheets.

Available-for-Sale Securities

The fair value of available-for-sale securities is determined by various valuation methodologies. Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. Level 2 securities include U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies, obligations of states and political subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

The following table presents the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fell as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

September 30, 2011

	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies	$	27,346	$	-	$	27,346	$	-
Municipal securities		66,818		-		66,818		-
Mortgage-backed securities		30,125		-		30,125		-
Corporate obligations		8,192		-		5,915		2,277
Other		978		978		-		-
Total	$	133,459	$	978	$	130,204	$	2,277

December 31, 2010

	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies	$	22,855	$	-	$	22,855	$	-
Municipal securities		54,673		-		54,673		-
Mortgage-backed Securities		18,318		-		18,318		-
Corporate Obligations		7,702		-		5,083		2,619
Other		986		986		-		-
Total	$	104,534	$	986	$	100,929	$	2,619

The following is a reconciliation of activity for assets measured at fair value based on significant unobservable (non-market) information.

	Bank-Issued
	Trust
(Dollars in thousands)	Preferred
	Securities
	2011			2010
Balance, January 1	$	2,619		$	3,233
Transfers into Level 3		-			-
Transfers out of Level 3		-			-
Other-than-temporary impairment loss included in earnings		(4	)		(472	)
Unrealized loss included in comprehensive income		(338	)		(142	)
Balance at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010	$	2,277		$	2,619

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Impaired Loans

Loans for which it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest due according to contractual terms are measured for impairment. Allowable methods for estimating fair value include using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans or, where a loan is determined not to be collateral dependent, using the discounted cash flow method.

If the impaired loan is identified as collateral dependent, then the fair value method of measuring the amount of impairment is utilized. This method requires obtaining a current independent appraisal of the collateral and applying a discount factor to the value. If the impaired loan is determined not to be collateral dependent, then the discounted cash flow method is used. This method requires the impaired loan to be recorded at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. The effective interest rate of a loan is the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs, or premium or discount existing at origination or acquisition of the loan. Impaired loans are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned acquired through loan foreclosure is initially recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell, establishing a new cost basis. The adjustment at the time of foreclosure is recorded through the allowance for loan losses. Due to the subjective nature of establishing the fair value, the actual fair value of the other real estate owned or foreclosed asset could differ from the original estimate. If it is determined the fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through non-interest expense. Operating costs associated with the assets are also recorded as non-interest expense. Gains and losses on the disposition of other real estate owned and foreclosed assets are netted and posted to other non-interest expense. Other real estate owned measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2011, amounted to $4.6 million. Other real estate owned is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents the fair value measurement of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fell at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

($ in thousands)

September 30, 2011	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Impaired loans	$	4,139	$	-	$	4,139	$	-
Other real estate owned	$	4,565	$	-	$	4,565	$	-

December 31, 2010	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Impaired loans	$	4,529	$	-	$	4,529	$	-

Other real estate owned	$	3,995	$	-	$	3,995	$	-

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Cash Equivalents – For such short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Investment in securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity – The fair value measurement for securities available-for-sale was discussed earlier. The same measurement approach was used for securities held-to-maturity.

Loans – The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.

Deposits – The fair values of demand deposits are, as required by ASC Topic 825, equal to the carrying value of such deposits. Demand deposits include noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts, and money market demand accounts. The fair value of variable rate term deposits, those repricing within six months or less, approximates the carrying value of these deposits. Discounted cash flows have been used to value fixed rate term deposits and variable rate term deposits repricing after six months. The discount rate used is based on interest rates currently being offered on comparable deposits as to amount and term.

Short-Term Borrowings – The carrying value of any federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings approximates their fair values.

FHLB and Other Borrowings – The fair value of the fixed rate borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flows, based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying amount of any variable rate borrowing approximates its fair value.

Subordinated Debentures – The subordinated debentures bear interest at a variable rate and the carrying value approximates the fair value.

Off-Balance Sheet Instruments – Fair values of off-balance sheet financial instruments are based on fees charged to enter into similar agreements. However, commitments to extend credit do not represent a significant value until such commitments are funded or closed. Management has determined that these instruments do not have a distinguishable fair value and no fair value has been assigned.

	As of				As of
	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010

			Estimated				Estimated
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
	(In thousands)
Financial Instruments:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	134,288	$	134,288	$	33,976	$	33,976
Securities available-for-sale		133,459		133,459		104,534		104,534
Securities held-to-maturity		3		3		3		3
Other securities		2,602		2,602		2,599		2,599
Loans, net		385,108		399,186		327,956		339,927

Liabilities:

Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	106,790	$	106,790	$	48,312	$	48,312
Interest-bearing deposits		495,152		496,390		348,167		349,565
Subordinated debentures		10,310		10,310		10,310		10,310
FHLB and other borrowings		27,051		27,051		30,107		30,107

NOTE H — LOANS

Loans typically provide higher yields than the other types of earning assets, and thus one of the Company's goals is for loans to be the largest category of the Company's earning assets. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, loans accounted for 60.3% and 72.1% of earning assets. The Company controls and mitigates the inherent credit and liquidity risks through the composition of its loan portfolio.

The following table shows the composition of the loan portfolio by category:

Composition of Loan Portfolio

	Sept. 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
				Percent						Percent
				of						of
	Amount			Total			Amount			Total
	(Dollars in thousands)

Mortgage loans held for sale	$	3,958			1.0	%	$	2,938			0.9	%
Commercial, financial and agricultural		51,619			13.3			48,427			14.6
Real Estate:
Mortgage-commercial		134,729			34.6			109,073			32.8
Mortgage-residential		111,985			28.8			102,425			30.8
Construction		69,927			18.0			58,962			17.7
Consumer and other		17,168			4.3			10,748			3.2
Total loans		389,386			100	%		332,573			100	%
Allowance for loan losses		(4,278	)					(4,617	)
Net loans	$	385,108					$	327,956

In the context of this discussion, a "real estate mortgage loan" is defined as any loan, other than a loan for construction purposes, secured by real estate, regardless of the purpose of the loan. The Company follows the common practice of financial institutions in the Company’s market area of obtaining a security interest in real estate whenever possible, in addition to any other available collateral. This collateral is taken to reinforce the likelihood of the ultimate repayment of the loan and tends to increase the magnitude of the real estate loan portfolio component. Generally, the Company limits its loan-to-value ratio to 80%. Management attempts to maintain a conservative philosophy regarding its underwriting guidelines and believes it will reduce the risk elements of its loan portfolio through strategies that diversify the lending mix.

Loans held for sale consist of mortgage loans originated by the Bank and sold into the secondary market. Commitments from investors to purchase the loans are obtained upon origination.

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the period is as follows:

(In thousands)

	Three Months		Nine Months
	Ended		Ended
	Sept. 30, 2011		Sept 30,2011

Balance at beginning of period	$	4,143	$	4,617
Loans charged-off:
Real Estate		318		1,244
Installment and Other		18		58
Commercial, Financial and Agriculture		1		308
Total		337		1,610
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off:
Real Estate		210		305
Installment and Other		12		60
Commercial, Financial and Agriculture		20		23
Total		242		388
Net Charge-offs		95		1,222
Provision for Loan Losses		230		883
Balance at end of period	$	4,278	$	4,278

The following tables represent how the allowance for loan losses is allocated to a particular loan type as well as the percentage of the category to total loans at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses

	September 30, 2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
	Amount		% of loans in each category to total loans

Commercial Non Real Estate	$	439		13.2	%
Commercial Real Estate		3,064		61.3
Consumer Real Estate		683		13.9
Consumer		88		11.6
Unallocated		4		-
Total	$	4,278		100	%

	December 31, 2010
	(Dollars in thousands)
	Amount		% of loans in each category to total loans

Commercial Non Real Estate	$	757		15.90	%
Commercial Real Estate		2,817		62.20
Consumer Real Estate		902		18.04
Consumer		140		2.90
Unallocated		1		.96
Total	$	4,617		100	%

The following table represents the Company’s impaired loans at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. This table excludes performing troubled debt restructurings.

	Sept. 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In thousands)
Impaired Loans:
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance	$	2,228	$	2,406
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance		1,911		2,123
Total impaired loans	$	4,139	$	4,529
Allowance for loan losses on impaired loans at period end		609		738

Total nonaccrual loans		4,139		4,212

Past due 90 days or more and still accruing		391		1,071
Average investment in impaired loans		4,138		14,486

The following table is a summary of interest recognized and cash-basis interest earned on impaired loans:

	Three Months Ended Sept 30, 2011		Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, 2011

Average of individually impaired loans during period	$	3,521	$	4,334
Interest income recognized during impairment		-		-
Cash-basis interest income recognized		50		243

The gross interest income that would have been recorded in the period that ended if the nonaccrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination, if held for part of the three months ended and nine months ended for September 30, 2011, was $50,000 and $243,000, respectively. The Company had no loan commitments to borrowers in non-accrual status at September 30, 2011 and 2010.

The following tables provide the ending balances in the Company's loans (excluding mortgage loans held for sale)and allowance for loan losses, broken down by portfolio segment as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The tables also provide additional detail as to the amount of our loans and allowance that correspond to individual versus collective impairment evaluation. The impairment evaluation corresponds to the Company's systematic methodology for estimating its Allowance for Loan Losses.

September 30, 2011

					Commercial,
			Installment		Financial
	Real Estate		and Other		and Agriculture		Total
	(In thousands)
Loans
Individually evaluated	$	3,850	$	36	$	253	$	4,139
Collectively evaluated		312,791		17,132		51,366		381,289
Total	$	316,641	$	17,168	$	51,619	$	385,428

Allowance for Loan Losses
Individually evaluated	$	542	$	12	$	55	$	609
Collectively evaluated		3,205		81		383		3,669
Total	$	3,747	$	93	$	438	$	4,278

December 31, 2010


					Commercial,
			Installment		Financial
	Real Estate		and Other		and Agriculture		Total
	(In thousands)
Loans
Individually evaluated	$	4,091	$	48	$	390	$	4,529
Collectively evaluated		266,504		9,083		49,519		325,106
Total	$	270,595	$	9,131	$	49,909	$	329,635

Allowance for Loan Losses
Individually evaluated	$	464	$	10	$	264	$	738
Collectively evaluated		3,254		132		493		3,879
Total	$	3,718	$	142	$	757	$	4,617

The following tables provide additional detail of impaired loans broken out according to class as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The recorded investment included in the following table represents customer balances net of any partial charge-offs recognized on the loans, net of any deferred fees and costs. As nearly all of our impaired loans at September 30, 2011 are on nonaccrual status, recorded investment excludes any insignificant amount of accrued interest receivable on loans 90-days or more past due and still accruing. The unpaid balance represents the recorded balance prior to any partial charge-offs.

September 30, 2011

							Average		Interest
							Recorded		Income
	Recorded		Unpaid		Related		Investment		Recognized
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		YTD		YTD
	(In thousands)
Impaired loans with no related allowance:
Commercial installment	$	132	$	132	$	-	$	71	$	3
Commercial real estate		1,796		1,796		-		1,092		29
Consumer real estate		292		292		-		369		1
Consumer installment		8		8		-		11		-
Total	$	2,228	$	2,228	$	-	$	1,543	$	33

Impaired loans with a related allowance:
Commercial installment	$	121	$	121	$	55	$	127	$	-
Commercial real estate		909		909		440		1,586		-
Consumer real estate		852		852		102		593		16
Consumer installment		29		29		12		29		-
Total	$	1,911	$	1,911	$	609	$	2,335	$	16
Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial installment	$	253	$	253	$	55	$	198	$	3
Commercial real estate		2,705		2,705		440		2,678		29
Consumer real estate		1,144		1,144		102		962		17
Consumer installment		37		37		12		40		-
Total Impaired Loans	$	4,139	$	4,139	$	609	$	3,878	$	49

December 31, 2010

							Average		Interest
							Recorded		Income
	Recorded		Unpaid		Related		Investment		Recognized
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		YTD		YTD
	(In thousands)
Impaired loans with no related allowance:
Commercial installment	$	12	$	12	$	-	$	387	$	1
Commercial real estate		2,230		2,230		-		7,884		72
Consumer real estate		147		149		-		2,185		8
Consumer installment		15		15		-		183		1
Total	$	2,404	$	2,406	$	-	$	10,639	$	82

Impaired loans with a related allowance:
Commercial installment	$	113	$	377	$	264	$	481	$	17
Commercial real estate		966		1,370		401		2,421		89
Consumer real estate		280		343		63		796		20
Consumer installment		23		33		10		149		-
Total	$	1,382	$	2,123	$	738	$	3,847	$	126

Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial installment	$	125	$	389	$	264	$	868	$	18
Commercial real estate		3,196		3,600		401		10,305		161
Consumer real estate		427		492		63		2,981		28
Consumer installment		38		48		10		332		1
Total Impaired Loans	$	3,786	$	4,529	$	738	$	14,486	$	208

The following tables provide additional detail of troubled debt restructurings at September 30, 2011.

For the Three Months Ending September 30, 2011

			Outstanding
	Outstanding		Recorded
	Recorded		Investment				Interest
	Investment		Post –		Number of		Income
	Pre-Modification		Modification		Loans		Recognized
	(in thousands except number of loans)

Commercial installment	$	-	$	-		-	$	-
Commercial real estate		-		-		-		-
Consumer real estate		1,026		1,024		1		11
Consumer installment		-		-		-		-
Total	$	1,026	$	1,024		1	$	11

For the Nine Months Ending September 30, 2011

			Outstanding
	Outstanding		Recorded
	Recorded		Investment				Interest
	Investment		Post –		Number of		Income
	Pre-Modification		Modification		Loans		Recognized
	(in thousands except number of loans)

Commercial installment	$	14	$	12		1	$	1
Commercial real estate		342		338		2		20
Consumer real estate		3,248		3,250		3		162
Consumer installment		23		20		2		1
Total	$	3,627	$	3,620		8	$	184

The balance of troubled debt restructurings at September 30, 2011 was $5.7 million, calculated for regulatory reporting purpose. Of these amounts, $3.7 million were performing in accordance with the modified terms. The remaining $2.0 million are on non-accrual. There was no allocation in specific reserves established with respect to these loans as of September 30, 2011. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had no additional amount committed on any loan classified as troubled debt restructuring.

The recorded investment in receivables for which the allowance for credit losses was previously measured under a general allowance for credit losses methodology and are now impaired under Section 310-10-35 was $3.6 million. The allowance for credit losses associated with those receivables on the basis of a current evaluation of loss was $0.00. All loans were performing as agreed with modified terms.

During the three month period ending September 30, 2011, the terms of one loan were modified as TDR. The loan was determined to be a TDR based on more than one renewal in which the borrower could not make minimal scheduled principal reductions.

During the nine month period ending September 30, 2011, the terms of 8 loans were modified as TDRs. The modifications included one of the following or a combination of the following: maturity date extensions, interest only payments, amortizations were extended beyond what would be available on similar type loans, and payment waiver. No interest rate concessions were given on these nor were any of these loans written down.

The following tables summarize by class our loans classified as past due in excess of 30 days or more in addition to those loans classified as non-accrual:

	September 30, 2011
	(In thousands)
			Past Due				Total
			90 Days				Past Due
	Past Due		or More				and
	30 to 89		and Still		Non-		Non-		Total
	Days		Accruing		Accrual		Accrual		Loans

Real Estate-construction	$	654	$	32	$	1,026	$	1,712	$	69,927
Real Estate-mortgage		2,329		304		1,236		3,869		111,985
Real Estate-non farm nonresidential		825		42		1,587		2,454		134,729
Commercial		51		10		253		314		51,619
Consumer		167		3		37		207		17,168
Total	$	4,026	$	391	$	4,139	$	8,556	$	385,428

	December 31, 2010
	(In thousands)
			Past Due 90				Total
			Days or				Past Due
	Past Due		More and				and
	30 to 89		Still				Non-		Total
	Days		Accruing		Non-Accrual		Accrual		Loans

Real Estate-construction	$	593	$	1	$	1,433	$	2,027	$	58,962
Real Estate-mortgage		3,673		153		893		4,719		102,426
Real Estate-non farm non residential		438		737		1,452		2,627		109,073
Commercial		740		144		386		1,270		48,427
Consumer		262		36		48		346		10,747
Total	$	5,706	$	1,071	$	4,212	$	10,989	$	329,635

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt, such as: current financial information, historical payment experience credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings, which are consistent with the definitions used in supervisory guidance:

Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the Company’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans.

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans (excluding mortgage loans held for sale) was as follows:

($ in thousands)

September 30, 2011

							Commercial,
			Real		Installment		Financial
	Real Estate		Estate		and		and
	Commercial		Mortgage		Other		Agriculture		Total

Pass	$	238,739	$	50,334	$	16,999	$	50,804	$	356,876
Special Mention		6,411		321		50		4		6,786
Substandard		17,115		2,940		119		800		20,974
Doubtful		741		130		-		14		885
Subtotal		263,006		53,725		17,168		51,622		385,521
Less:
Unearned Discount		66		24		-		3		93
Loans, net of unearned discount	$	262,940	$	53,701	$	17,168	$	51,619	$	385,428

December 31, 2010

							Commercial,
			Real		Installment		Financial
	Real Estate		Estate		and		and
	Commercial		Mortgage		Other		Agriculture		Total

Pass	$	187,657	$	53,776	$	8,764	$	47,500	$	297,697
Special Mention		5,154		125		70		14		5,363
Substandard		17,820		6,130		297		2,215		26,462
Doubtful		-		-		-		180		180
Subtotal		210,631		60,031		9,131		49,909		329,702
Less:
Unearned Discount		67		-		-		-		67
Loans, net of unearned discount	$	210,564	$	60,031	$	9,131	$	49,909	$	329,635

NOTE I — SECURITIES

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with authoritative guidance. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessarily required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

A summary of the amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities at September 30, 2011, follows:

($ in thousands)

	September 30, 2011
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies	$	27,119	$	227	$	-	$	27,346
Tax-exempt and taxable obligations of states and municipal subdivisions		64,709		2,333		224		66,818
Mortgage-backed securities		29,204		1,002		81		30,125
Corporate obligations		10,473		27		2,308		8,192
Other		1,255		-		277		978
Total	$	132,760	$	3,589	$	2,890	$	133,459
Held-to-maturity securities:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	3	$	-	$	-	$	3

NOTE J — ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The Company has developed policies and procedures for evaluating the overall quality of its credit portfolio and the timely identification of potential problem loans. Management’s judgment as to the adequacy of the allowance is based upon a number of assumptions which it believes to be reasonable, but which may not prove to be accurate, particularly given the Company’s short operating history and rapid growth. Thus, there can be no assurance that charge-offs in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses or that additional increases in the loan loss allowance will not be required.

The Company’s allowance consists of two parts. The first part is determined in accordance with authoritative guidance regarding contingencies. The Company’s determination of this part of the allowance is based upon quantitative and qualitative factors. A loan loss history based upon the three year quarterly moving average is utilized in determining the appropriate allowance. Historical loss factors are determined by graded and ungraded loans by loan type. These historical loss factors are applied to the loans by loan type to determine an indicated allowance. The loss factors of peer groups are considered in the determination of the allowance and are used to assist in the establishment of a long-term loss history for areas in which this data is unavailable and incorporated into the qualitative factors to be considered. The historical loss factors may also be modified based upon other qualitative factors including but not limited to local and national economic conditions, trends of delinquent loans, changes in lending policies and underwriting standards, concentrations, and management’s knowledge of the loan portfolio. These factors require judgment upon the part of management and are based upon state and national economic reports received from various institutions and agencies including the Federal Reserve Bank, United States Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, meetings with the Company’s loan officers and loan committee, and data and guidance received or obtained from the Company’s regulatory authorities.

The second part of the allowance is determined in accordance with authoritative guidance regarding loan impairment. Impaired loans are determined based upon a review by internal loan review and senior loan officers.

The sum of the two parts constitutes management’s best estimate of an appropriate allowance for loan losses. When the estimated allowance is determined, it is presented to the Company’s audit committee for review and approval on a quarterly basis.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis, and a specific allowance is assigned to each loan determined to be impaired. Impaired loans not deemed collateral dependent are analyzed according to the ultimate repayment source, whether that is cash flow from the borrower, guarantor or some other source of repayment. Impaired loans are deemed collateral dependent if in the Company’s opinion the ultimate source of repayment will be generated from the liquidation of collateral.

The Company discontinues accrual of interest on loans when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, that a borrower’s financial condition is such that the collection of interest is doubtful. Generally, the Company will place a delinquent loan in nonaccrual status when the loan becomes 90 days or more past due. At the time a loan is placed in nonaccrual status, all interest which has been accrued on the loan but remains unpaid is reversed and deducted from earnings as a reduction of reported interest income. No additional interest is accrued on the loan balance until the collection of both principal and interest becomes reasonably certain.

NOTE K – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent events have been evaluated by management through the date the financial statements were issued.

NOTE L – RECLASSIFICATION

Certain amounts in the 2010 financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the current period financial statement presentation.

ITEM NO. 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FINANCIAL CONDITION

The following discussion contains "forward-looking statements" relating to, without limitation, future economic performance, plans and objectives of management for future operations, and projections of revenues and other

financial items that are based on the beliefs of the Company's management, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the Company's management. The words "expect," "estimate," "anticipate," and "believe," as well as similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company's actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements, and the Company's operating performance each quarter is subject to various risks and uncertainties that are discussed in detail in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the "Risk Factors" section in the Company's most recently filed Form 10-K.

The First represents the primary asset of the Company. The First reported total assets of $708.4 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $502.1 million at December 31, 2010. Loans increased $56.8 million, or 17.1%, during the first nine months of 2011. Deposits at September 30, 2011, totaled $601.9 million compared to $408.3 million at December 31, 2010. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2011, The First reported net income of $2.4 million compared to $2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

NONPERFORMING ASSETS AND RISK ELEMENTS. Diversification within the loan portfolio is an important means of reducing inherent lending risks. At September 30, 2011, The First had no concentrations of ten percent or more of total loans in any single industry or any geographical areatside its immediate market areas.

At September 30, 2011, The First had loans past due as follows:

	($ In Thousands)

Past due 30 through 89 days	$	4,026
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing		391

The accrual of interest is discontinued on loans which become ninety days past due (principal and/or interest), unless the loans are adequately secured and in the process of collection. Nonaccrual loans totaled $4.1 million at September 30, 2011, a decrease of $.1 million from December 31, 2010. Any other real estate owned is carried at fair value, determined by an appraisal. Other real estate owned totaled $4.6 million at September 30, 2011. A loan is classified as a restructured loan when the following two conditions are present: First, the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and second, the creditor grants a concession it would not otherwise consider but for the borrower’s financial difficulties. At September 30, 2011, the Bank had $5.7 million in loans that were modified as troubled debt restructurings. Of these amounts considered as troubled debt restructurings, $3.7 million of such loans were performing in accordance with the modified terms.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity is adequate with cash and cash equivalents of $134.3 million as of September 30, 2011. In addition, loans and investment securities repricing or maturing within one year or less exceeded $185.8 million at September 30, 011. Approximately $51.2 million in loan commitments could fund within the next three months and other commitments, primarily standby letters of credit, totaled $.4 million at September 30, 2011.

There are no known trends or any known commitments or uncertainties that will result in The First’s liquidity increasing or decreasing in a significant way.

Total consolidated equity capital at September 30, 2011, was $59.6 million, or approximately 8.4% of total assets. The Company currently has adequate capital positions to meet the minimum capital requirements for all regulatory agencies. The Company’s capital ratios as of September 30, 2011, were as follows:

Tier 1 leverage	10.16	%
Tier 1 risk-based	13.18	%
Total risk-based	14.18	%

On June 30, 2006, The Company issued $4,124,000 of floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures to The First Bancshares Statutory Trust 2 in which the Company owns all of the common equity. The debentures are the sole asset of the Trust. The Trust issued $4,000,000 of Trust Preferred Securities (TPSs) to investors. The Company’s obligations under the debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the Trust’s obligations under the preferred securities. The preferred securities are redeemable by the Company in 2011, or earlier in the event the deduction of related interest for federal income taxes is prohibited, treatment as Tier 1 capital is no longer permitted, or certain other contingencies arise. The preferred securities must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures in 2036. Interest on the preferred securities is the three month London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.65% and is payable quarterly. The terms of the subordinated debentures are identical to those of the preferred securities. On July 27, 2007, The Company issued $6,186,000 of floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures to The First Bancshares Statutory Trust 3 in which the Company owns all of the common equity. The debentures are the sole asset of Trust 3. The Trust issued $6,000,000 of Trust Preferred Securities (TPSs) to investors. The Company’s obligations under the debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the Trust’s obligations under the preferred securities. The preferred securities are redeemable by the Company in 2012, or earlier in the event the deduction of related interest for federal income taxes is prohibited, treatment as Tier 1 capital is no longer permitted, or certain other contingencies arise. The preferred securities must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures in 2037. Interest on the preferred securities is the three month LIBOR plus 1.40% and is payable quarterly. The terms of the subordinated debentures are identical to those of the preferred securities. In accordance with the authoritative guidance, the trusts are not included in the consolidated financial statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - QUARTERLY

The Company had a consolidated net income of $746,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared with consolidated net income of $622,000 for the same period last year.

Net interest income increased to $4,732,000 from $4,226,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, or an increase of 12% as compared to the same period in 2010. Principally as a result of the business combination discussed at Note C to the Consolidated Financial Statements, earning assets through September 30, 2011, increased $181.2 million, or 39.0% and interest-bearing liabilities also increased $141.6 million or 36.2% when compared to September 30, 2010.

Non interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2011, was $1,088,000 compared to $1,054,000 for the same period in 2010, reflecting an increase of $34,000 or 3.2%. Included in noninterest income is service charges on deposit accounts, which for the three months ended September 30, 2011, totaled $632,000 compared to $600,000 for the same period in 2010.

The provision for loan losses was $230,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared with $372,000 for the same period in 2010. The allowance for loan losses of $4.3 million at September 30, 2011 (approximately 1.10% of total loans and 1.27% of loans excluding those booked at fair value due to business combination) is considered by management to be adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The level of this allowance is dependent upon a number of factors, including the total amount of past due loans, general economic conditions, and management’s assessment of potential losses. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant change. Ultimately, losses may vary from current estimates and future additions to the allowance may be necessary.

Thus, there can be no assurance that charge-offs in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses or that additional increases in the loan loss allowance will not be required. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses quarterly and makes provisions for loan losses based on this evaluation.

Non interest expense increased by $454,000 or 11.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, when compared with the same period in 2010. This increase is primarily related to costs associated with the acquisition of the Whitney branches, as more fully discussed at Note C to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – YEAR TO DATE

The Company had a consolidated net income of $1,917,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared with consolidated net income of $1,807,000 for the same period last year.

Net interest income increased to $13,494,000 million from $12,095,000 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, or an increase of 11.6% as compared to the same period in 2010. Principally as a result of the business combination previously discussed, earning assets through September 30, 2011, increased $181.2 million, or 39.0% and interest-bearing liabilities increased $141.6 million or 36.2% when compared to September 30, 2010.

Noninterest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was $3,027,000 compared to $2,881,000 for the same period in 2010, reflecting an increase of $146,000 or 5.1%. Included in noninterest income are service charges on deposit accounts, which for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, totaled $1,758,000 compared to $1,786,000 for the same period in 2010, reflecting a decrease of $28,000.

The provision for loan losses was $883,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared with $754,000 for the same period in 2010. The allowance for loan losses of $4.3 million at September 30, 2011 (approximately 1.10% of total loans and 1.27% of loans excluding those booked at fair value due to business combination)is considered by management to be adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The level of this allowance is dependent upon a number of factors, including the total amount of past due loans, general economic conditions, and management's assessment of potential losses. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant change. Ultimately, losses may vary from current estimates and future additions to the allowance may be necessary. Thus, there can be no assurance that charge-offs in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses or that additional increases in the loan loss allowance will not be required. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses quarterly and makes provisions for loan losses based on this evaluation.

Noninterest expenses increased by $1,678,000 or 14.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, when compared with the same period in 2010. This increase is primarily related to nonrecurring events including compromises of contingent claims expensed in the first and second quarters of 2011 and costs associated with the acquisition of the Whitney branches.

ITEM NO. 3.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of September 30, 2011, (the “Evaluation Date”), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.

There have been no changes, significant or otherwise, in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM NO. 4.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, “Reconsideration of Effective Control of Repurchase Agreements.” This guidance (ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing) eliminates a requirement for entities to consider whether a transferor has the ability to repurchase the financial assets in a repurchase agreement. This requirement was previously used to determine whether the transferor maintained effective control. The change could lead to more conclusions that a repo arrangement should be accounted for as a secured borrowing rather than as a sale. ASU 2011-03 is effective for the first interim period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the effects, if any, of this guidance on its financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS.” This ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to develop a single, converged fair value framework on how (not when) to measure fair value and what disclosures about fair value measurements are required. This ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP (ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement). It does expand existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and eliminates unnecessary wording differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 is effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of this guidance on its financial statement disclosures.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” This guidance (ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income) revises the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements. It requires entities to report components in either a continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The items that must be reported in other comprehensive income do not change. ASU 2011-05 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of this guidance on its financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, “Testing Goodwill for Impairment.” This guidance (ASC Topic 220, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other) gives entities testing goodwill for impairment the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of a reporting unit in step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. If it is determined, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not less than the carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would be required. Otherwise, further testing would not be needed. ASU 2011-08 is effective for all entities for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of this guidance on its financial statements.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There are no material changes in the Company’s risk factors since December 31, 2010. Please refer to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The First Bancshares, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2011.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITY AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not Applicable

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not Applicable

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not Applicable

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits

Exhibit No.

31.1		Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b) The Company filed two reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	THE FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
	(Registrant)

	/s/	M. RAY (HOPPY)COLE, JR.
11-14-11		M. Ray (Hoppy) Cole, Jr.
(Date)		Chief Executive Officer

	/s/	DEEDEE LOWERY
11-14-11		DeeDee Lowery, Executive
(Date)		Vice President and Chief
		Financial Officer