Annual Statements Open main menu

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST INC - Annual Report: 2011 (Form 10-K)

10-K
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form 10-K

 

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

Or

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 1-13102

 

 

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

 

Maryland   36-3935116
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)
311 S. Wacker Drive,
Suite 3900, Chicago, Illinois
  60606
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

(312) 344-4300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock

(Title of Class)

New York Stock Exchange

(Name of exchange on which registered)

Depositary Shares Each Representing 1/10,000 of a Share of 7.25% Series J Cumulative Preferred Stock

Depositary Shares Each Representing 1/10,000 of a Share of 7.25% Series K Cumulative Preferred Stock

(Title of class)

New York Stock Exchange

(Name of exchange on which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   þ    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  þ

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $986.0 million based on the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange for such stock on June 30, 2011.

At February 28, 2012, 86,733,657 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were outstanding.

 

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III incorporates certain information by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s fiscal year.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

         Page  
PART I.   

Item 1.

  Business      4   

Item 1A.

  Risk Factors      8   

Item 1B.

  Unresolved SEC Comments      15   

Item 2.

  Properties      15   

Item 3.

  Legal Proceedings      20   

Item 4.

  Mine Safety Disclosures      20   
PART II.   

Item 5.

  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities      21   

Item 6.

  Selected Financial Data      23   

Item 7.

  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations      24   

Item 7A.

  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk      42   

Item 8.

  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data      42   

Item 9.

  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure      42   

Item 9A.

  Controls and Procedures      43   

Item 9B.

  Other Information      43   
PART III.   

Item 10.

  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance      44   

Item 11.

  Executive Compensation      44   

Item 12.

  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters      44   

Item 13.

  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence      44   

Item 14.

  Principal Accountant Fees and Services      44   
PART IV.   

Item 15.

  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules      45   

Signatures

     S-23   

 

2


Table of Contents

This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company, are generally identifiable by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “seek,” “target,” “potential,” “focus,” “may,” “should” or similar expressions. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a materially adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to: changes in national, international, regional and local economic conditions generally and real estate markets specifically; changes in legislation/regulation (including changes to laws governing the taxation of real estate investment trusts) and actions of regulatory authorities (including the Internal Revenue Service); our ability to qualify and maintain our status as a real estate investment trust; the availability and attractiveness of financing (including both public and private capital) to us and to our potential counterparties; the availability and attractiveness of terms of additional debt repurchases; interest rates; our credit agency ratings; our ability to comply with applicable financial covenants; competition; changes in supply and demand for industrial properties (including land, the supply and demand for which is inherently more volatile than other types of industrial property) in the Company’s current and proposed market areas; difficulties in consummating acquisitions and dispositions; risks related to our investments in properties through joint ventures; environmental liabilities; slippages in development or lease-up schedules; tenant creditworthiness; higher-than-expected costs; changes in asset valuations and related impairment charges; changes in general accounting principles, policies and guidelines applicable to real estate investment trusts; international business risks and those additional factors described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this report or the dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., First Industrial, L.P. and their controlled subsidiaries. We refer to our operating partnership, First Industrial, L.P., as the “Operating Partnership.”

 

3


Table of Contents

PART I

THE COMPANY

Item 1. Business

General

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. is a Maryland corporation organized on August 10, 1993, and is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). We are a self-administered and fully integrated real estate company which owns, manages, acquires, sells, develops, and redevelops industrial real estate. As of December 31, 2011, our in-service portfolio consisted of 354 light industrial properties, 113 R&D/flex properties, 159 bulk warehouse properties, 105 regional warehouse properties and eight manufacturing properties containing approximately 66.3 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”) located in 26 states in the United States and one province in Canada. Our in-service portfolio includes all properties other than developed, redeveloped and acquired properties that have not yet reached stabilized occupancy (generally defined as properties that are 90% leased). Properties which are at least 75% occupied at acquisition are placed in-service. Acquired properties less than 75% occupied are placed in-service upon the earlier of reaching 90% occupancy or one year from the acquisition date. Development properties are placed in-service upon the earlier of reaching 90% occupancy or one year from the date construction is completed. Redevelopments (generally projects which require capital expenditures exceeding 25% of basis) are placed in-service upon the earlier of reaching 90% occupancy or one year from the completion of renovation construction.

Our interests in our properties and land parcels are held through partnerships, corporations, and limited liability companies controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Company, including the Operating Partnership, of which we are the sole general partner with an approximate 94.3% and 92.8% ownership interest at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and through our taxable REIT subsidiaries. We also conduct operations through other partnerships and limited liability companies, the operating data of which, together with that of the Operating Partnership and the taxable REIT subsidiaries, is consolidated with that of the Company as presented herein.

We also own noncontrolling equity interests in, and provide services to, two joint ventures (the “2003 Net Lease Joint Venture” and the “2007 Europe Joint Venture”). During 2010, we provided various services to, and ultimately disposed of our equity interests in, five joint ventures (the “2005 Development/Repositioning Joint Venture,” the “2005 Core Joint Venture,” the “2006 Net Lease Co-Investment Program,” the “2006 Land/Development Joint Venture” and the “2007 Canada Joint Venture;” together with the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture and the 2007 Europe Joint Venture, the “Joint Ventures”). The Joint Ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the operating data of our Joint Ventures is not consolidated with that of the Company as presented herein. The 2007 Europe Joint Venture does not own any properties. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the Joint Ventures.

We utilize an operating approach which combines the effectiveness of decentralized, locally-based property management, acquisition, sales and development functions with the cost efficiencies of centralized acquisition, sales and development support, capital markets expertise, asset management and fiscal control systems. At February 28, 2012, we had 176 employees.

We maintain a website at www.firstindustrial.com. Information on this website shall not constitute part of this Form 10-K. Copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports are available without charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with or furnished to the SEC. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter, along with supplemental financial and operating information prepared by us, are all available without charge on our website or upon request to us. Amendments

 

4


Table of Contents

to, or waivers from, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that apply to our executive officers or directors will also be posted to our website. We also post or otherwise make available on our website from time to time other information that may be of interest to our investors. Please direct requests as follows:

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.

311 S. Wacker, Suite 3900

Chicago, IL 60606

Attention: Investor Relations

Business Objectives and Growth Plans

Our fundamental business objective is to maximize the total return to our stockholders through per share distributions and increases in the value of our properties and operations. Our long-term business growth plans include the following elements:

 

   

Internal Growth. We seek to grow internally by (i) increasing revenues by renewing or re-leasing spaces subject to expiring leases at higher rental levels; (ii) increasing occupancy levels at properties where vacancies exist and maintaining occupancy elsewhere; (iii) controlling and minimizing property operating and general and administrative expenses; and (iv) renovating existing properties.

 

   

External Growth. We seek to grow externally through (i) the development of industrial properties; (ii) the acquisition of portfolios of industrial properties, industrial property businesses or individual properties which meet our investment parameters and target markets; (iii) additional joint venture investments; and (iv) the expansion of our properties.

Our ability to pursue our long-term growth plans is affected by market conditions and our financial condition and operating capabilities.

Business Strategies

We utilize the following six strategies in connection with the operation of our business:

 

   

Organization Strategy. We implement our decentralized property operations strategy through the deployment of experienced regional management teams and local property managers. We provide acquisition, development and financing assistance, asset management oversight and financial reporting functions from our headquarters in Chicago, Illinois to support our regional operations. We believe the size of our portfolio enables us to realize operating efficiencies by spreading overhead among many properties and by negotiating purchasing discounts.

 

   

Market Strategy. Our market strategy is to concentrate on the top industrial real estate markets in the United States. These markets have one or more of the following characteristics: (i) strong industrial real estate fundamentals, including improving industrial demand expectations; (ii) a history of industry diversity and outlook for economic growth; and (iii) sufficient size to provide opportunity for ample transaction volume.

 

   

Leasing and Marketing Strategy. We have an operational management strategy designed to enhance tenant satisfaction and portfolio performance. We pursue an active leasing strategy, which includes broadly marketing available space, seeking to renew existing leases at higher rents per square foot and seeking leases which provide for the pass-through of property-related expenses to the tenant. We also have local and national marketing programs which focus on the business and real estate brokerage communities and national tenants.

 

   

Acquisition/Development Strategy. Our acquisition/development strategy is to invest in properties and other assets in the top industrial real estate markets in the United States.

 

   

Financing Strategy. To finance acquisitions, developments and debt maturities, as market conditions permit, we utilize a portion of proceeds from property sales, proceeds from mortgage financings, line

 

5


Table of Contents
 

of credit borrowings under our new $450 million unsecured credit facility, and proceeds from the issuance, when and as warranted, of additional equity securities (see Recent Developments). We also continually evaluate joint venture arrangements as another source of capital. As of February 28, 2012, we had approximately $262.4 million available for additional borrowings under our new $450 million unsecured credit facility.

 

   

Disposition Strategy. We continuously evaluate local market conditions and property-related factors in all of our markets for purposes of identifying assets suitable for disposition. During 2010, management identified a pool of real estate assets (the “Non-Strategic Assets”) that it intends to sell. At December 31, 2011, the Non-Strategic Assets consisted of 133 industrial properties comprising approximately 11.3 million square feet of GLA and land parcels comprising approximately 359 gross acres.

Recent Developments

During December 2011, we entered into a new $450 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “Unsecured Credit Facility”). The Unsecured Credit Facility provides for interest only payments initially at LIBOR plus 210 basis points or at a base rate plus 210 basis points, at our election, based on our leverage ratio. The Unsecured Credit Facility matures on December 12, 2014, unless extended an additional year at our election, subject to certain conditions. We may request that the maximum borrowing capacity under the Unsecured Credit Facility be increased to $500 million, subject to certain conditions. The Unsecured Credit Facility replaces our previous $400 million credit facility (the “Old Credit Facility”). Our Old Credit Facility commitment was for a $200 million term borrowing, $100 million of which was paid off earlier in 2011, and an aggregate $200 million of revolving borrowings. For the term borrowing, the Old Credit Facility required interest-only payments through March 29, 2012 at LIBOR plus 325 basis points or at a base rate plus 225 basis points, at our election. For the revolving borrowings, the Old Credit Facility provided for interest only payments at LIBOR plus 275 or at a base rate plus 175 basis points, at our election. At the time the Unsecured Credit Facility was executed, we wrote off $1.2 million of unamortized deferred financing costs during 2011 related to the replacement of the Old Credit Facility, which is reflected as loss from retirement of debt on our Consolidated Statement of Operations.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we acquired one industrial property comprising approximately 0.7 million square feet of GLA in connection with the purchase of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture at a cap rate of 8.4%. The cap rate was calculated by annualizing the contract rent in place at the time of acquisition and dividing it by the gross agreed upon fair value for the real estate. The acquisition was funded with a cash payment of $5.3 million and the assumption of a mortgage loan in the amount of $24.4 million. We also sold 36 industrial properties, at a weighted average cap rate of 6.3%, and one parcel of land for an aggregate gross sales price of $86.6 million. The cap rate is calculated by taking revenues of the property (excluding straight-line rent, lease inducement amortization and above and below market lease amortization) less operating expenses of the property for a period of twelve months prior to sale and dividing the sum by the sales price of the property. Included in the 36 industrial properties sold is one industrial property totaling approximately 0.4 million square feet of GLA that we transferred title to a lender in satisfaction of a non-recourse mortgage loan (See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). At December 31, 2011, we owned 739 in-service industrial properties containing approximately 66.3 million square feet of GLA.

During 2011, we repurchased and retired prior to maturity $112.8 million of our senior unsecured notes and recognized a loss from retirement of debt on our Consolidated Statement of Operations of $2.0 million. Also, we paid off and retired our 2011 Exchangeable Notes, at maturity, in the amount of $128.9 million.

During 2011, we originated $255.9 million in mortgage financings at a weighted average interest rate of 4.57%, with maturities ranging between June 2018 and October 2021. Also, we paid off and/or retired $62.7 million in mortgage loans payable and recognized a loss on debt retirement of $2.1 million.

 

6


Table of Contents

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we issued 17,300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, generating $201.4 million in net proceeds, in underwritten public offerings. Additionally, we issued 115,856 shares of the Company’s common stock, generating $1.4 million in net proceeds, under the Company’s “at-the-market” equity offering program (“ATM”).

Future Property Acquisitions, Developments and Property Sales

We have acquisition and development programs through which we seek to identify portfolio and individual industrial property acquisitions and developments.

We also sell properties based on market conditions and property-related factors. As a result, we are currently engaged in negotiations relating to the possible sale of certain industrial properties in our portfolio.

When evaluating potential industrial property acquisitions and developments, as well as potential industrial property sales, we will consider such factors as: (i) the geographic area and type of property; (ii) the location, construction quality, condition and design of the property; (iii) the terms of tenant leases, including the potential for rent increases; (iv) the potential for economic growth and the tax and regulatory environment of the area in which the property is located; (v) the occupancy and demand by tenants for properties of a similar type in the vicinity; (vi) competition from existing properties and the potential for the construction of new properties in the area. (vii) the potential for capital appreciation of the property; (viii) the ability to improve the property’s performance through renovation; and (ix) the potential for expansion of the physical layout of the property and/or the number of sites.

INDUSTRY

Industrial properties are typically used for the design, assembly, packaging, storage and distribution of goods and/or the provision of services. As a result, the demand for industrial space in the United States is related to the level of economic output. For the five years ended December 31, 2011, the national occupancy rate for industrial properties in the United States has ranged from 85.4%* to 90.4%*, with an occupancy rate of 86.4%* at December 31, 2011.

 

*  Source: CBRE Econometric Advisors

 

7


Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risk Factors

Our operations involve various risks that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to pay distributions on our common stock and the market price of our common stock. These risks, among others contained in our other filings with the SEC, include:

Disruptions in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain financing and negatively impact our liquidity, financial condition and operating results.

From time to time the capital and credit markets in the United States and other countries experience significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions, which can cause the market prices of many securities and the spreads on prospective debt financings to fluctuate substantially. These circumstances can materially impact liquidity in the financial markets, making terms for certain financings less attractive, and in some cases result in the unavailability of financing. A significant amount of our existing indebtedness was sold through capital markets transactions. We anticipate that the capital markets could be a source of refinancing of our existing indebtedness in the future. This source of refinancing may not be available if capital market volatility and disruption occurs. Furthermore, we could potentially lose access to available liquidity under our Unsecured Credit Facility if one or more participating lenders were to default on their commitments. If our ability to issue additional debt or equity securities, to finance future acquisitions, developments and redevelopments and Joint Venture activities or to borrow money under our Unsecured Credit Facility were to be impaired by capital market volatility and disruption, it could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition.

In addition, capital and credit market price volatility could make the valuation of our properties more difficult. There may be significant uncertainty in the valuation, or in the stability of the value, of our properties that could result in a substantial decrease in the value of our properties. As a result, we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of our properties, which may require us to recognize an impairment loss in earnings.

Real estate investments’ value fluctuates depending on conditions in the general economy and the real estate business. These conditions may limit the Company’s revenues and available cash.

The factors that affect the value of our real estate and the revenues we derive from our properties include, among other things:

 

   

general economic conditions;

 

   

local, regional, national and international economic conditions and other events and occurrences that affect the markets in which we own properties;

 

   

local conditions such as oversupply or a reduction in demand in an area;

 

   

the attractiveness of the properties to tenants;

 

   

tenant defaults;

 

   

zoning or other regulatory restrictions;

 

   

competition from other available real estate;

 

   

our ability to provide adequate maintenance and insurance; and

 

   

increased operating costs, including insurance premiums and real estate taxes.

These factors may be amplified in light of the disruption of the global credit markets. Our investments in real estate assets are concentrated in the industrial sector, and the demand for industrial space in the United States

 

8


Table of Contents

is related to the level of economic output. Accordingly, reduced economic output may lead to lower occupancy rates for our properties. In addition, if any of our tenants experiences a downturn in its business that weakens its financial condition, delays lease commencement, fails to make rental payments when due, becomes insolvent or declares bankruptcy, the result could be a termination of the tenant’s lease, which could adversely affect our cash flow from operations.

Many real estate costs are fixed, even if income from properties decreases.

Our financial results depend on leasing space to tenants on terms favorable to us. Our income and funds available for distribution to our stockholders will decrease if a significant number of our tenants cannot pay their rent or we are unable to lease properties on favorable terms. In addition, if a tenant does not pay its rent, we may not be able to enforce our rights as landlord without delays and we may incur substantial legal costs. Costs associated with real estate investment, such as real estate taxes and maintenance costs, generally are not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investment.

The Company may be unable to sell properties when appropriate because real estate investments are not as liquid as certain other types of assets.

Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly, which will tend to limit our ability to adjust our property portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. The inability to respond promptly to changes in the performance of our property portfolio could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to service debt and make distributions to our stockholders. In addition, like other companies qualifying as REITs under the Code, we must comply with the safe harbor rules relating to the number of properties disposed of in a year, their tax basis and the cost of improvements made to the properties, or meet other tests which enable a REIT to avoid punitive taxation on the sale of assets. Thus, our ability at any time to sell assets may be restricted.

The Company may be unable to sell properties on advantageous terms.

We have sold to third parties a significant number of properties in recent years and, as part of our business, we intend to continue to sell properties to third parties. Our ability to sell properties on advantageous terms depends on factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties. If we are unable to sell properties on favorable terms or redeploy the proceeds of property sales in accordance with our business strategy, then our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our common stock could be adversely affected.

The Company may be unable to complete development and re-development projects on advantageous terms.

As part of our business, we develop new and re-develop existing properties when and as conditions warrant. In addition, we have sold to third parties or sold to joint ventures development and re-development properties, and we may continue to sell such properties to third parties or to sell or contribute such properties to joint ventures as opportunities arise. The real estate development and re-development business involves significant risks that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our common stock, which include:

 

   

we may not be able to obtain financing for development projects on favorable terms and complete construction on schedule or within budget, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs and delays in leasing the properties and generating cash flow;

 

   

we may not be able to obtain, or may experience delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other governmental permits and authorizations;

 

   

the properties may perform below anticipated levels, producing cash flow below budgeted amounts and limiting our ability to sell such properties to third parties or to sell such properties to joint ventures.

 

9


Table of Contents

The Company may be unable to acquire properties on advantageous terms or acquisitions may not perform as the Company expects.

We acquire and intend to continue to acquire primarily industrial properties. The acquisition of properties entails various risks, including the risks that our investments may not perform as expected and that our cost estimates for bringing an acquired property up to market standards may prove inaccurate. Further, we face significant competition for attractive investment opportunities from other well-capitalized real estate investors, including both publicly-traded REITs and private investors. This competition increases as investments in real estate become attractive relative to other forms of investment. As a result of competition, we may be unable to acquire additional properties as we desire or the purchase price may be elevated. In addition, we expect to finance future acquisitions through a combination of borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility, proceeds from equity or debt offerings and debt originations by the Company and proceeds from property sales, which may not be available and which could adversely affect our cash flow. Any of the above risks could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market value of, our common stock.

The Company may be unable to renew leases or find other lessees.

We are subject to the risks that, upon expiration, leases may not be renewed, the space subject to such leases may not be relet or the terms of renewal or reletting, including the cost of required renovations, may be less favorable than expiring lease terms. If we were unable to promptly renew a significant number of expiring leases or to promptly relet the space covered by such leases, or if the rental rates upon renewal or reletting were significantly lower than the current rates, our financial condition, results of operation, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our common stock could be adversely affected. As of December 31, 2011, leases with respect to approximately 8.2 million, 11.3 million and 8.5 million square feet of GLA, representing 15%, 20% and 15% of our total GLA, expire in 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively.

The Company might fail to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.

We intend to operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code. Although we believe that we are organized and will operate in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT, qualification as a REIT involves the satisfaction of numerous requirements, some of which must be met on a recurring basis. These requirements are established under highly technical and complex Code provisions of which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and involve the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control.

If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at corporate rates. This could result in a discontinuation or substantial reduction in dividends to stockholders and in cash to pay interest and principal on debt securities that we issue. Unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from electing treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we failed to qualify as a REIT.

Certain property transfers may generate prohibited transaction income, resulting in a penalty tax on the gain attributable to the transaction.

As part of our business, we sell properties to third parties as opportunities arise. Under the Code, a 100% penalty tax could be assessed on the gain resulting from sales of properties that are deemed to be prohibited transactions. The question of what constitutes a prohibited transaction is based on the facts and circumstances surrounding each transaction. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) could contend that certain sales of properties by us are prohibited transactions. While we do not believe that the IRS would prevail in such a dispute, if the matter were successfully argued by the IRS, the 100% penalty tax could be assessed against the profits from these transactions. In addition, any income from a prohibited transaction may adversely affect our ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT.

 

10


Table of Contents

The REIT distribution requirements may limit the Company’s ability to retain capital and require the Company to turn to external financing sources.

We could, in certain instances, have taxable income without sufficient cash to enable us to meet the distribution requirements of the REIT provisions of the Code. In that situation, we could be required to borrow funds or sell properties on adverse terms in order to meet those distribution requirements. In addition, because we must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income each year, our ability to accumulate capital may be limited. Thus, to provide capital resources for our ongoing business, and to satisfy our debt repayment obligations and other liquidity needs, we may be more dependent on outside sources of financing, such as debt financing or issuances of additional capital stock, which may or may not be available on favorable terms. Additional debt financings may substantially increase our leverage and additional equity offerings may result in substantial dilution of stockholders’ interests.

Debt financing, the degree of leverage and rising interest rates could reduce the Company’s cash flow.

Where possible, we intend to continue to use leverage to increase the rate of return on our investments and to allow us to make more investments than we otherwise could. Our use of leverage presents an additional element of risk in the event that the cash flow from our properties is insufficient to meet both debt payment obligations and the distribution requirements of the REIT provisions of the Code. In addition, rising interest rates would reduce our cash flow by increasing the amount of interest due on our floating rate debt and on our fixed rate debt as it matures and is refinanced.

Failure to comply with covenants in our debt agreements could adversely affect our financial condition.

The terms of our agreements governing our Unsecured Credit Facility and other indebtedness require that we comply with a number of financial and other covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage and leverage ratios and maintaining insurance coverage. Complying with such covenants may limit our operational flexibility. Our failure to comply with these covenants could cause a default under the applicable debt agreement even if we have satisfied our payment obligations. Consistent with our prior practice, we will, in the future, continue to interpret and certify our performance under these covenants in a good faith manner that we deem reasonable and appropriate. However, these financial covenants are complex and there can be no assurance that these provisions would not be interpreted by the noteholders or lenders in a manner that could impose and cause us to incur material costs. We anticipate that we will be able to operate in compliance with our financial covenants in 2012. Our ability to meet our financial covenants may be adversely affected if economic and credit market conditions limit our ability to reduce our debt levels consistent with, or result in net operating income below, our current expectations. Under our Unsecured Credit Facility, an event of default can also occur if the lenders, in their good faith judgment, determine that a material adverse change has occurred which could prevent timely repayment or materially impair our ability to perform our obligations under the loan agreement.

Upon the occurrence of an event of default, we would be subject to higher finance costs and fees, and the lenders under our Unsecured Credit Facility will not be required to lend any additional amounts to us. In addition, our outstanding senior unsecured notes as well as all outstanding borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility, together with accrued and unpaid interest and fees, could be accelerated and declared to be immediately due and payable. Furthermore, our Unsecured Credit Facility and the indentures governing our senior unsecured notes contain certain cross-default provisions, which are triggered in the event that our other material indebtedness is in default. These cross-default provisions may require us to repay or restructure the Unsecured Credit Facility and the senior unsecured notes or other debt that is in default, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock. If repayment of any of our borrowings is accelerated, we cannot provide assurance that we will have sufficient assets to repay such indebtedness or that we would be able to borrow sufficient funds to refinance such indebtedness. Even if we are able to obtain new financing, it may not be on commercially reasonable terms, or terms that are acceptable to us.

 

11


Table of Contents

Cross-collateralization of mortgage loans could result in foreclosure on substantially all of the Company’s properties if the Company is unable to service its indebtedness.

We may obtain additional mortgage debt financing in the future, if it is available to us. These mortgages may be issued on a recourse, non-recourse or cross-collateralized basis. Cross-collateralization makes all of the subject properties available to the lender in order to satisfy our debt. Holders of indebtedness that is so secured will have a claim against these properties. To the extent indebtedness is cross-collateralized, lenders may seek to foreclose upon properties that are not the primary collateral for their loan, which may, in turn, result in acceleration of other indebtedness secured by properties. Foreclosure of properties would result in a loss of income and asset value to us, making it difficult for us to meet both debt payment obligations and the distribution requirements of the REIT provisions of the Code. At December 31, 2011, mortgage loans payable totaling $390.2 million were cross-collateralized.

The Company may have to make lump-sum payments on its existing indebtedness.

We are required to make the following lump-sum or “balloon” payments under the terms of some of our indebtedness, including indebtedness of the Operating Partnership:

 

   

$35.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.750% Notes due 2032 (the “2032 Notes”)

 

   

$125.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.600% Notes due 2028 (the “2028 Notes”)

 

   

$6.1 million aggregate principal amount of 7.150% Notes due 2027 (the “2027 Notes”)

 

   

$106.9 million aggregate principal amount of 5.950% Notes due 2017 (the “2017 II Notes”)

 

   

$59.6 million aggregate principal amount of 7.500% Notes due 2017 (the “2017 Notes”)

 

   

$159.7 million aggregate principal amount of 5.750% Notes due 2016 (the “2016 Notes”)

 

   

$90.8 million aggregate principal amount of 6.420% Notes due 2014 (the “2014 Notes”)

 

   

$61.8 million aggregate principal amount of 6.875% Notes due 2012 (the “2012 Notes”)

 

   

$601.5 million in mortgage loans payable, in the aggregate, due between January 2014 and October 2021 on certain of our mortgage loans payable.

 

   

a $450.0 million Unsecured Credit Facility under which we may borrow to finance the acquisition of additional properties and for other corporate purposes, including working capital.

As of December 31, 2011, $149.0 million was outstanding under the Unsecured Credit Facility at a weighted average interest rate of 2.385%, maturing December 12, 2014.

Our ability to make required payments of principal on outstanding indebtedness, whether at maturity or otherwise, may depend on our ability either to refinance the applicable indebtedness or to sell properties. We have no commitments to refinance the 2012 Notes, the 2014 Notes, the 2016 Notes, the 2017 Notes, the 2017 II Notes, the 2027 Notes, the 2028 Notes, the 2032 Notes, the Unsecured Credit Facility or the mortgage loans. Our existing mortgage loan obligations are collateralized by our properties and therefore such obligations will permit the lender to foreclose on those properties in the event of a default.

There is no limitation on debt in the Company’s organizational documents.

As of December 31, 2011, our ratio of debt to our total market capitalization was 54.9%. We compute the percentage by calculating our total consolidated debt as a percentage of the aggregate market value of all outstanding shares of our common stock, assuming the exchange of all limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership for common stock, plus the aggregate stated value of all outstanding shares of preferred stock and total consolidated debt. Our organizational documents do not contain any limitation on the amount or percentage of indebtedness we may incur. Accordingly, we could become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increase in debt service that could adversely affect our ability to make expected distributions to stockholders and an increased risk of default on our obligations.

 

12


Table of Contents

Rising interest rates on the Company’s Unsecured Credit Facility could decrease the Company’s available cash.

Our Unsecured Credit Facility bears interest at a floating rate. As of December 31, 2011, our Unsecured Credit Facility had an outstanding balance of $149.0 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.385%. Our Unsecured Credit Facility presently bears interest at LIBOR plus 210 basis points or at a base rate plus 210 basis points, at our election. Based on the outstanding balance on our Unsecured Credit Facility as of December 31, 2011, a 10% increase in interest rates would increase interest expense by $0.4 million on an annual basis. Increases in the interest rate payable on balances outstanding under our Unsecured Credit Facility would decrease our cash available for distribution to stockholders.

The Company’s mortgages may impact the Company’s ability to sell encumbered properties on advantageous terms or at all.

As part of our plan to enhance liquidity and pay down our debt, we have originated numerous mortgage financings and from time to time engage in active discussions with various lenders regarding the origination of additional mortgage financings. Certain of our mortgages contain, and it is anticipated that some future mortgages will contain, substantial prepayment premiums which we would have to pay upon the sale of a property, thereby reducing the net proceeds to us from the sale of any such property. As a result, our willingness to sell certain properties and the price at which we may desire to sell a property may be impacted by the terms of any mortgage financing encumbering a property. If we are unable to sell properties on favorable terms or redeploy the proceeds of property sales in accordance with our business strategy, then our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our common stock could be adversely affected.

Adverse market and economic conditions could cause us to recognize additional impairment charges.

We regularly review our real estate assets for impairment indicators, such as a decline in a property’s occupancy rate or decline in general market conditions. If we determine that indicators of impairment are present, we review the properties affected by these indicators to determine whether an impairment charge is required. We use considerable judgment in making determinations about impairments, from analyzing whether there are indicators of impairment to the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the investment. Accordingly, our subjective estimates and evaluations may not be accurate, and such estimates and evaluations are subject to change or revision.

From time to time, adverse market and economic conditions and market volatility make it difficult to value the real estate assets owned by us as well as the value of our interests in unconsolidated joint ventures. There may be significant uncertainty in the valuation, or in the stability of the cash flows, discount rates and other factors related to such assets due to the adverse market and economic conditions that could result in a substantial decrease in their value. We may be required to recognize additional asset impairment charges in the future, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Earnings and cash dividends, asset value and market interest rates affect the price of the Company’s common stock.

As a REIT, the market value of our common stock, in general, is based primarily upon the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and cash dividends. The market value of our common stock is also based upon the market value of our underlying real estate assets. For this reason, shares of our common stock may trade at prices that are higher or lower than our net asset value per share. To the extent that we retain operating cash flow for investment purposes, working capital reserves, or other purposes, these retained funds, while increasing the value of our underlying assets, may not correspondingly increase the market price of our common stock. Our failure to meet the market’s expectations with regard to future earnings and cash dividends likely would adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Further, the distribution yield on the common stock (as a percentage of the price of the common stock) relative to market interest rates may also influence the price of our common stock. An increase in market interest rates might lead prospective purchasers of our common stock to expect a higher distribution yield, which would adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

 

13


Table of Contents

The Company may incur unanticipated costs and liabilities due to environmental problems.

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real estate may be liable for the costs of clean-up of certain conditions relating to the presence of hazardous or toxic materials on, in or emanating from a property, and any related damages to natural resources. Environmental laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic materials. The presence of such materials, or the failure to address those conditions properly, may adversely affect the ability to rent or sell the property or to borrow using the property as collateral. Persons who dispose of or arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic materials may also be liable for the costs of clean-up of such materials, or for related natural resource damages, at or from an off-site disposal or treatment facility, whether or not the facility is owned or operated by those persons. No assurance can be given that existing environmental assessments with respect to any of our properties reveal all environmental liabilities, that any prior owner or operator of any of the properties did not create any material environmental condition not known to us or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any of our properties. In addition, changes to existing environmental regulation to address, among other things, climate change, could increase the scope of our potential liabilities.

The Company’s insurance coverage does not include all potential losses.

We currently carry comprehensive insurance coverage including property, boiler & machinery, liability, fire, flood, terrorism, earthquake, extended coverage and rental loss as appropriate for the markets where each of our properties and their business operations are located. The insurance coverage contains policy specifications and insured limits customarily carried for similar properties and business activities. We believe our properties are adequately insured. However, there are certain losses, including losses from earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, pollution, acts of war, acts of terrorism or riots, that are not generally insured against or that are not generally fully insured against because it is not deemed to be economically feasible or prudent to do so. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs with respect to one or more of our properties, we could experience a significant loss of capital invested and potential revenues from these properties, and could potentially remain obligated under any recourse debt associated with the property.

The Company is subject to risks and liabilities in connection with its investments in properties through Joint Ventures.

As of December 31, 2011, the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture owned approximately 3.4 million square feet of properties (see Subsequent Events). Our net investment in this Joint Venture was $1.7 million at December 31, 2011. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of available funds that we may invest in joint ventures and we intend to continue to develop and acquire properties through joint ventures with other persons or entities when warranted by the circumstances. Joint venture investments, in general, involve certain risks, including:

 

   

joint venturers may share certain approval rights over major decisions;

 

   

joint venturers might fail to fund their share of any required capital commitments;

 

   

joint venturers might have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals that would affect our ability to operate the property;

 

   

joint venturers may have the power to act contrary to our instructions, requests, policies or objectives, including our current policy with respect to maintaining our qualification as a real estate investment trust;

 

   

the joint venture agreements often restrict the transfer of a member’s or joint venturer’s interest or “buy-sell” or may otherwise restrict our ability to sell the interest when we desire or on advantageous terms;

 

   

disputes between us and our joint venturers may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business and subject the properties owned by the applicable joint venture to additional risk; and

 

14


Table of Contents
   

we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our joint venturers.

The occurrence of one or more of the events described above could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our common stock.

In addition, joint venture investments in real estate involve all of the risks related to the ownership, acquisition, development, sale and financing of real estate discussed in the risk factors above. To the extent our investments in joint ventures are adversely affected by such risks our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our common stock could be adversely affected.

We are subject to risks associated with our international operations.

As of December 31, 2011, we owned one industrial property and one land parcel located in Canada. Our international operations will be subject to risks inherent in doing business abroad, including:

 

   

exposure to the economic fluctuations in the locations in which we invest;

 

   

difficulties and costs associated with complying with a wide variety of complex laws, treaties and regulations;

 

   

revisions in tax treaties or other laws and regulations, including those governing the taxation of our international revenues;

 

   

obstacles to the repatriation of earnings and funds;

 

   

currency exchange rate fluctuations between the United States dollar and foreign currencies;

 

   

restrictions on the transfer of funds; and

 

   

national, regional and local political uncertainty.

When we acquire properties located outside of the United States, we may face risks associated with a lack of market knowledge or understanding of the local economy, forging new business relationships in the area and unfamiliarity with local government and permitting procedures. We work to mitigate such risks through extensive diligence and research and associations with experienced partners; however, there can be no guarantee that all such risks will be eliminated.

Adverse changes in our credit ratings could negatively affect our liquidity and business operations.

The credit ratings of the Operating Partnership’s senior unsecured notes and the Company’s preferred stock are based on the Company’s operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position and other factors employed by the credit rating agencies in their rating analyses. Our credit ratings can affect the availability, terms and pricing of any indebtedness and preferred stock that we may incur going forward. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain any credit rating, and in the event any credit rating is downgraded, we could incur higher borrowing costs or be unable to access certain capital markets at all.

 

Item 1B. Unresolved SEC Comments

None.

 

Item 2. Properties

General

At December 31, 2011, we owned 739 in-service industrial properties containing an aggregate of approximately 66.3 million square feet of GLA in 26 states and one province in Canada, with a diverse base of approximately 1,900 tenants engaged in a wide variety of businesses, including manufacturing, retail, wholesale

 

15


Table of Contents

trade, distribution and professional services. The average annual rent per square foot on a portfolio basis, calculated at December 31, 2011, was $4.40. The properties are generally located in business parks that have convenient access to interstate highways and/or rail and air transportation. We maintain insurance on our properties that we believe is adequate.

We classify our properties into five industrial categories: light industrial, R&D/flex, bulk warehouse, regional warehouse and manufacturing. While some properties may have characteristics which fall under more than one property type, we use what we believe is the most dominant characteristic to categorize the property.

The following describes, generally, the different industrial categories:

 

   

Light industrial properties are of less than 100,000 square feet, have a ceiling height of 16-21 feet, are comprised of 5%-50% of office space and contain less than 50% of manufacturing space.

 

   

R&D/flex buildings are of less than 100,000 square feet, have a ceiling height of less than 16 feet, are comprised of 50% or more of office space and contain less than 25% of manufacturing space.

 

   

Bulk warehouse buildings are of more than 100,000 square feet, have a ceiling height of at least 22 feet, are comprised of 5%-15% of office space and contain less than 25% of manufacturing space.

 

   

Regional warehouses are of less than 100,000 square feet, have a ceiling height of at least 22 feet, are comprised of 5%-15% of office space and contain less than 25% of manufacturing space.

 

   

Manufacturing properties are a diverse category of buildings that have various ceiling heights, are comprised of 5%-15% of office space and contain at least 50% of manufacturing space.

Each of the properties is wholly owned by us. The following tables summarize certain information as of December 31, 2011, with respect to our in-service properties.

 

16


Table of Contents

In-Service Property Summary Totals

 

    Light Industrial        R&D/Flex        Bulk Warehouse       
 
Regional
Warehouse
  
  
    Manufacturing   

Metropolitan Area

  GLA     Number  of
Properties
    GLA     Number  of
Properties
    GLA     Number  of
Properties
    GLA     Number  of
Properties
    GLA     Number  of
Properties
 

Atlanta, GA

    622,944        11        203,750        5        3,820,667        14        649,807        7        364,000        1   

Baltimore, MD

    721,565        12        253,071        7        586,647        3        96,000        1        171,000        1   

Central PA

    297,790        6        —          —          3,723,585        8        381,719        4        —          —     

Chicago, IL

    975,829        15        248,090        4        2,198,942        12        593,851        6        166,954        1   

Cincinnati, OH

    347,220        6        100,000        2        918,250        3        763,069        5        —          —     

Cleveland, OH

    —          —          —          —          1,317,799        7        —          —          —          —     

Columbus, OH

    217,612        2        —          —          2,423,547        7        341,800        2        —          —     

Dallas, TX

    2,307,047        42        511,418        19        2,248,380        17        460,533        6        —          —     

Denver, CO

    1,148,368        26        577,054        14        400,498        3        760,277        7        —          —     

Detroit, MI

    2.216,102        82        322,010        10        385,577        3        615,259        15        414,482        4   

Houston, TX

    585,349        9        132,997        6        2,457,546        11        446,318        6        —          —     

Indianapolis, IN

    861,100        18        25,000        2        2,327,482        8        539,927        8        —          —     

Miami, FL

    88,820        1        —          —          —          —          424,430        7        —          —     

Milwaukee, WI

    431,508        9        55,940        1        1,726,929        7        90,089        1        —          —     

Minneapolis/ St.

                   

Paul, MN

    973,459        14        265,565        3        2,817,128        13        323,165        5        —          —     

Nashville, TN

    163,852        2        —          —          1,824,831        7        —          —          —          —     

Northern New Jersey

    749,849        13        199,967        4        329,593        2        —          —          —          —     

Philadelphia, PA

    186,641        6        11,256        1        690,599        2        330,334        4        —          —     

Phoenix, AZ

    38,560        1        —          —          710,403        5        354,327        5        —          —     

Salt Lake City, UT

    697,825        34        146,937        6        279,179        1        —          —          —          —     

Seattle, WA

    —          —          —          —          258,126        2        132,195        2        —          —     

Southern California

    734,010        20        88,064        1        1,023,893        6        676,980        11        —          —     

Southern New Jersey

    115,626        2        45,054        1        281,100        2        191,329        2        —          —     

St. Louis, MO

    823,655        11        —          —          1,613,095        6        —          —          —          —     

Tampa, FL

    234,679        7        689,782        27        209,500        1        —          —          —          —     

Toronto, ON

    —          —          —          —          280,773        1        —          —          —          —     

Other(a)

    201,997        5        —          —          2,150,755        8        88,498        1        301,317        1   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

    15,741,407        354        3,875,955        113        37,004,824        159        8,259,907        105        1,417,753        8   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a) Properties are located in Grand Rapids, MI, Austin, TX, Orlando, FL, Horn Lake, MS, Kansas City, MO, San Antonio, TX, Birmingham, AL, Omaha, NE, Jefferson County, KY, Greenville, KY, Des Moines, IA, Fort Smith, AR, and Winchester, VA.

 

17


Table of Contents

In-Service Property Summary Totals

 

      Totals  

Metropolitan Area

   GLA      Number  of
Properties
     Average
Occupancy
at  12/31/11
    GLA as
a %

of Total
Portfolio
    Encumbrances
at 12/31/11
($ in 000s)(b)
 

Atlanta, GA

     5,661,168         38         76     8.5   $ 35,517   

Baltimore, MD

     1,828,283         24         83     2.8     7,745   

Central PA

     4,403,094         18         91     6.6     59,907   

Chicago, IL

     4,183,666         38         96     6.3     39,080   

Cincinnati, OH

     2,128,539         16         79     3.2     10,312   

Cleveland, OH

     1,317,799         7         97     2.0     34,409   

Columbus, OH

     2,982,959         11         82     4.5     —     

Dallas, TX

     5,527,378         84         85     8.3     45,286   

Denver, CO

     2,886,197         50         84     4.3     33,830   

Detroit, MI

     3,953,430         114         92     6.0     —     

Houston, TX

     3,622,210         32         96     5.5     54,224   

Indianapolis, IN

     3,753,509         36         93     5.7     9,763   

Miami, FL

     513,250         8         50     0.8     —     

Milwaukee, WI

     2,304,466         18         87     3.5     37,763   

Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN

     4,379,317         35         81     6.6     60,610   

Nashville, TN

     1,988,683         9         87     3.0     28,278   

Northern New Jersey

     1,279,409         19         89     1.9     25,185   

Philadelphia, PA

     1,218,830         13         98     1.8     26,551   

Phoenix, AZ

     1,103,290         11         93     1.7     14,122   

Salt Lake City, UT

     1,123,941         41         86     1.7     10,562   

Seattle, WA

     390,321         4         80     0.6     5,744   

Southern California

     2,522,947         38         93     3.8     67,441   

Southern New Jersey

     633,109         7         95     1.0     5,821   

St. Louis, MO

     2,436,750         17         98     3.7     37,242   

Tampa, FL

     1,133,961         35         82     1.7     9,622   

Toronto, ON

     280,773         1         100     0.4     —     

Other(a)

     2,742,567         15         98     4.1     30,881   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total or Average

     66,299,846         739         88     100   $ 689,895   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a) Properties are located in Grand Rapids, MI, Austin, TX, Orlando, FL, Horn Lake, MS, Kansas City, MO, San Antonio, TX, Birmingham, AL, Omaha, NE, Jefferson County, KY, Greenville, KY, Des Moines, IA, Fort Smith, AR, and Winchester, VA.
(b) Certain properties are pledged as collateral under our mortgage financings at December 31, 2011. For purposes of this table, the total principal balance of a mortgage loan payable that is collateralized by a pool of properties is allocated among the properties in the pool based on each property’s carrying balance. In addition to the amounts included in the table, we also have $0.4 million of indebtedness which is collateralized by a letter of credit.

 

18


Table of Contents

Property Acquisition/Development Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we acquired one industrial property with a fair value of approximately $30.6 million in connection with the purchase of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture. The acquisition was funded with a cash payment of $5.3 million and the assumption of a mortgage loan in the amount of $24.4 million. The acquired industrial property has the following characteristics:

 

Metropolitan Area

   Number  of
Properties
     GLA      Property
Type
   Occupancy
at 12/31/11
 

Houston, TX

     1         663,821       Bulk
Warehouse
     100

At December 31, 2011 we have one building comprising 0.7 million square feet of GLA located in the Inland Empire market that is under development. The estimated completion cost, inclusive of impairment charges recorded prior to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, is approximately $34.7 million. There can be no assurance that the actual completion cost will not exceed the estimated completion cost.

Property Sales

During 2011, we sold 36 industrial properties totaling approximately 2.9 million square feet of GLA and one land parcel. Total gross sales proceeds approximated $86.6 million. The 36 industrial properties sold have the following characteristics:

 

Metropolitan Area

   Number  of
Properties
     GLA     

Property Type

Chicago, IL

     3         397,420       Lt. Industrial/Bulk Warehouse

Dallas, TX

     1         61,260       Light Industrial

Denver, CO

     5         189,663       Lt. Industrial/R&D/Flex

Detroit, MI

     11         430,317       Lt. Industrial/R&D/Flex/ Bulk/Regional Warehouse

Milwaukee, WI

     1         37,765       R&D/Flex

Nashville, TN

     1         41,353       Light Industrial

Philadelphia, PA

     1         14,187       Light Industrial

Southern California

     1         384,025       Bulk Warehouse

Southern New Jersey

     2         434,538       R&D Flex/Manufacturing

Toronto, ON

     2         336,540       Manufacturing

Other(a)

     8         589,049       R&D/Flex/Bulk/Regional Warehouse/Manufacturing
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total

     36         2,916,117      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

(a) Properties were located in Wichita, KS, Horn Lake, MS, Grand Rapids, MI, Sumner, IA, Shreveport, LA and Abilene, TX.

Property Acquisitions and Sales Subsequent to Year End

From January 1, 2012 to February 28, 2012, we acquired one industrial property comprising approximately 0.4 million square feet of GLA in connection with the purchase of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture. The acquisition was funded through the assumption of a mortgage loan in the amount of $12.0 million, which was subsequently paid off at closing and a cash payment of $8.3 million. We will account for this transaction as a step acquisition utilizing the purchase method of accounting. There were no industrial properties sold during this time.

 

19


Table of Contents

Tenant and Lease Information

We have a diverse base of approximately 1,900 tenants engaged in a wide variety of businesses including manufacturing, retail, wholesale trade, distribution and professional services. At December 31, 2011, our leases have a weighted average lease length of 5.8 years and provide for periodic rent increases that are either fixed or based on changes in the Consumer Price Index. Industrial tenants typically have net or semi-net leases and pay as additional rent their percentage of the property’s operating costs, including the costs of common area maintenance, property taxes and insurance. As of December 31, 2011, approximately 88% of the GLA of our in-service properties was leased, and no single tenant or group of related tenants accounted for more than 2.7% of our rent revenues, nor did any single tenant or group of related tenants occupy more than 2.0% of the total GLA of our in-service properties.

Lease Expirations (1)

The following table shows scheduled lease expirations for all leases for our in-service properties as of December 31, 2011.

 

Year of Expiration(1)

   Number of
Leases
Expiring
     GLA
Expiring(2)
     Percentage
of GLA
Expiring(2)
    Annual Base
Rent

Under
Expiring

Leases(3)
     Percentage
of Total

Annual
Base Rent

Expiring(3)
 
                         (In thousands)         

2012

     475         8,230,670         15   $ 37,998         15

2013

     473         11,263,999         20     50,950         20

2014

     332         8,540,810         15     39,098         16

2015

     233         6,150,997         11     27,247         11

2016

     203         7,020,163         12     28,063         11

2017

     98         3,918,362         7     17,918         7

2018

     50         3,914,906         7     15,499         6

2019

     26         1,801,912         3     9,178         4

2020

     17         2,135,104         4     7,831         3

2021

     19         1,764,236         3     6,892         3

Thereafter

     21         1,845,534         3     8,402         4
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     1,947         56,586,693         100   $ 249,076         100
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes leases that expire on or after January 1, 2012 and assumes tenants do not exercise existing renewal, termination or purchase options.
(2) Does not include existing vacancies of 9,713,153 aggregate square feet.
(3) Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent (cash basis) per the terms of the lease, as of December 31, 2011, multiplied by 12. If free rent is granted, then the first positive rent value is used.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. All such proceedings, taken together, are not expected to have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position or liquidity of the Company.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

 

20


Table of Contents

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low closing prices per share and distributions declared per share for our common stock, which trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “FR.”

 

Quarter Ended

   High      Low      Distribution
Declared
 

December 31, 2011

   $ 10.23       $ 7.54       $ 0.0000   

September 30, 2011

   $ 12.23       $ 7.81       $ 0.0000   

June 30, 2011

   $ 12.67       $ 10.51       $ 0.0000   

March 31, 2011

   $ 11.89       $ 9.45       $ 0.0000   

December 31, 2010

   $ 8.78       $ 4.99       $ 0.0000   

September 30, 2010

   $ 5.37       $ 3.76       $ 0.0000   

June 30, 2010

   $ 9.01       $ 4.82       $ 0.0000   

March 31, 2010

   $ 8.29       $ 4.77       $ 0.0000   

We had 559 common stockholders of record registered with our transfer agent as of February 28, 2012.

In order to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code, we are generally required to make common share distributions and preferred share distributions (other than capital gain distributions) to our shareholders in amounts that together at least equal i) the sum of a) 90% of our “REIT taxable income” computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and net capital gains and b) 90% of net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property, minus ii) certain excess non-cash income.

Our common share distribution policy is determined by our board of directors and is dependent on multiple factors, including cash flow and capital expenditure requirements, as well as ensuring that we meet the minimum distribution requirements set forth in the Code. We met the minimum distribution requirements with respect to 2011.

During 2011, the Operating Partnership did not issue any units of limited partnership interest (“Units”).

Subject to lock-up periods and certain adjustments, Units of the Operating Partnership are redeemable for common stock of the Company on a one-for-one basis or cash at the option of the Company.

Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information regarding our equity compensation plans.

 

Plan Category

   Number of
Securities

to be Issued
Upon
Exercise of

Outstanding
Options,

Warrants
and Rights
     Weighted-
Average

Exercise
Price of

Outstanding
Options,

Warrants
and Rights
     Number of
Securities

Remaining
Available

for Further
Issuance

Under Equity
Compensation
Plans
 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

     —           —           1,621,617   

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

     25,201       $ 31.57         277,573   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     25,201       $ 31.57         1,899,190   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

21


Table of Contents

Performance Graph

The following graph provides a comparison of the cumulative total stockholder return among the Company, the FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Total Return Index (the “NAREIT Index”) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”). The comparison is for the periods from December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2011 and assumes the reinvestment of any dividends. The closing price for our common stock quoted on the NYSE at the close of business on December 31, 2006 was $46.89 per share. The NAREIT Index includes REITs with 75% or more of their gross invested book value of assets invested directly or indirectly in the equity ownership of real estate. Upon written request, we will provide stockholders with a list of the REITs included in the NAREIT Index. The historical information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of future performance. The following graph was prepared at our request by Research Data Group, Inc., San Francisco, California.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*

Among First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., The S&P 500 Index

And The FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index

 

LOGO

 

* $100 invested on 12/31/06 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.

Fiscal year ending December 31.

Copyright(C) 2012 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.

 

     12/06      12/07      12/08      12/09      12/10      12/11  

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.

   $ 100.00       $ 79.27       $ 19.26       $ 13.34       $ 22.35       $ 26.10   

S&P 500

     100.00         105.49         66.46         84.05         96.71         98.75   

FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs

     100.00         84.31         52.50         67.20         85.98         93.11   

 

* The information provided in this performance graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material,” to be “filed” or to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 unless specifically treated as such.

 

22


Table of Contents
Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following sets forth selected financial and operating data for the Company on a historical consolidated basis. The following data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The historical statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007 include the results of operations of the Company as derived from our audited financial statements, adjusted for discontinued operations. The results of operations of properties sold are presented in discontinued operations if they met both of the following criteria: (a) the operations and cash flows of the property have been (or will be) eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company as a result of the disposition and (b) we will not have any significant involvement in the operations of the property after the disposal transaction. The historical balance sheet data and other data as of December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007 include the balances of the Company as derived from our audited financial statements.

 

    Year Ended
12/31/11
    Year Ended
12/31/10
    Year Ended
12/31/09
    Year Ended
12/31/08
    Year Ended
12/31/07
 
    (In thousands, except per share and property data)  

Statement of Operations Data:

         

Total Revenues

  $ 317,835      $ 321,778      $ 384,572      $ 480,442      $ 338,116   

Loss from Continuing Operations

    (32,201     (155,699     (20,327     (148,526     (84,983

Loss from Continuing Operations Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc’s Common Stockholders and Participating Securities

    (47,751     (161,236     (35,593     (140,040     (89,068

Net (Loss) Income Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders and Participating Securities

  $ (27,010   $ (222,498   $ (13,783   $ 20,169      $ 130,368   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Weighted Average Common Share Outstanding:

         

Loss from Continuing Operations Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders

  $ (0.59   $ (2.56   $ (0.73   $ (3.24   $ (2.02
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders

  $ (0.34   $ (3.53   $ (0.28   $ 0.41      $ 2.90   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Distributions Per Share

  $ 0.00      $ 0.00      $ 0.00      $ 2.41      $ 2.85   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding

    80,616        62,953        48,695        43,193        44,086   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Data (End of Period):

         

Real Estate, Before Accumulated Depreciation

  $ 2,992,096      $ 2,618,767      $ 3,319,764      $ 3,385,597      $ 3,326,268   

Total Assets

    2,666,657        2,750,054        3,204,586        3,223,501        3,257,888   

Indebtedness (Inclusive of Indebtedness Held for Sale)

    1,479,483        1,742,776        1,998,332        2,032,635        1,940,747   

Total Equity

    1,072,595        892,144        1,074,247        990,716        1,080,056   

Other Data:

         

Cash Flow From Operating Activities

  $ 87,534      $ 83,189      $ 142,179      $ 71,185      $ 92,989   

Cash Flow From Investing Activities

    (3,779     (9,923     4,777        6,274        126,909   

Cash Flow From Financing Activities

    (99,504     (230,383     32,724        (79,754     (230,276

 

23


Table of Contents
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with “Selected Financial Data” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

In addition, the following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company, are generally identifiable by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “seek,” “target,” “potential,” “focus,” “may,” “should” or similar expressions. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a materially adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to: changes in national, international, regional and local economic conditions generally and real estate markets specifically; changes in legislation/regulation (including changes to laws governing the taxation of REITs) and actions of regulatory authorities (including the IRS); our ability to qualify and maintain our status as a REIT; the availability and attractiveness of financing (including both public and private capital) to us and to our potential counterparties; the availability and attractiveness of terms of additional debt repurchases; interest rates; our credit agency ratings; our ability to comply with applicable financial covenants; competition; changes in supply and demand for industrial properties (including land, the supply and demand for which is inherently more volatile than other types of industrial property) in the Company’s current and proposed market areas; difficulties in consummating acquisitions and dispositions; risks related to our investments in properties through joint ventures; environmental liabilities; slippages in development or lease-up schedules; tenant creditworthiness; higher-than-expected costs; changes in asset valuations and related impairment charges; changes in general accounting principles, policies and guidelines applicable to real estate investment trusts; international business risks and those additional factors described under the heading “Risk Factors” and in our other filings with the SEC. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this report or the dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements.

The Company was organized in the state of Maryland on August 10, 1993. We are a REIT, as defined in the Code. We began operations on July 1, 1994. Our interests in our properties and land parcels are held through partnerships, corporations, and limited liability companies controlled, directly or indirectly, by us, including First Industrial, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), of which we are the sole general partner, and through our taxable REIT subsidiaries. We also conduct operations through other partnerships and limited liability companies, the operating data of which, together with that of the Operating Partnership and the taxable REIT subsidiaries, is consolidated with that of the Company, as presented herein.

We also own noncontrolling equity interests in, and provide services to, two joint ventures (the “2003 Net Lease Joint Venture” and the “2007 Europe Joint Venture”). During 2010, we provided various services to, and ultimately disposed of our equity interests in, five joint ventures (the “2005 Development/Repositioning Joint Venture,” the “2005 Core Joint Venture,” the “2006 Net Lease Co-Investment Program,” the “2006 Land/Development Joint Venture” and the “2007 Canada Joint Venture;” together with the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture and the 2007 Europe Joint Venture, the “Joint Ventures”). The Joint Ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the operating data of our Joint Ventures is not consolidated with that of the Company as presented herein. The 2007 Europe Joint Venture does not own any properties. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the Joint Ventures.

We believe our financial condition and results of operations are, primarily, a function of our performance in four key areas: leasing of industrial properties, acquisition and development of additional industrial properties, disposition of industrial properties and access to external capital.

 

24


Table of Contents

We generate revenue primarily from rental income and tenant recoveries from long-term (generally three to six years) operating leases of our industrial properties. Such revenue is offset by certain property specific operating expenses, such as real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management, utilities and insurance expenses, along with certain other costs and expenses, such as depreciation and amortization costs and general and administrative and interest expenses. Our revenue growth is dependent, in part, on our ability to (i) increase rental income, through increasing either or both occupancy rates and rental rates at our properties, (ii) maximize tenant recoveries and (iii) minimize operating and certain other expenses. Revenues generated from rental income and tenant recoveries are a significant source of funds, in addition to income generated from gains/losses on the sale of our properties (as discussed below), for our liquidity. The leasing of property, in general, and occupancy rates, rental rates, operating expenses and certain non-operating expenses, in particular, are impacted, variously, by property specific, market specific, general economic and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. The leasing of property also entails various risks, including the risk of tenant default. If we were unable to maintain or increase occupancy rates and rental rates at our properties or to maintain tenant recoveries and operating and certain other expenses consistent with historical levels and proportions, our revenue would decline. Further, if a significant number of our tenants were unable to pay rent (including tenant recoveries) or if we were unable to rent our properties on favorable terms, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our common stock would be adversely affected.

Our revenue growth is also dependent, in part, on our ability to acquire existing, and acquire and develop new, additional industrial properties on favorable terms. The Company seeks to identify opportunities to acquire existing industrial properties on favorable terms, and, when conditions permit, also seeks to identify opportunities to acquire and develop new industrial properties on favorable terms. Existing properties, as they are acquired, and acquired and developed properties, as they are leased, generate revenue from rental income, tenant recoveries and fees, income from which, as discussed above, is a source of funds for our distributions. The acquisition and development of properties is impacted, variously, by property specific, market specific, general economic and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. The acquisition and development of properties also entails various risks, including the risk that our investments may not perform as expected. For example, acquired existing and acquired and developed new properties may not sustain and/or achieve anticipated occupancy and rental rate levels. With respect to acquired and developed new properties, we may not be able to complete construction on schedule or within budget, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs and delays in leasing the properties. Also, we face significant competition for attractive acquisition and development opportunities from other well-capitalized real estate investors, including both publicly-traded REITs and private investors. Further, as discussed below, we may not be able to finance the acquisition and development opportunities we identify. If we were unable to acquire and develop sufficient additional properties on favorable terms, or if such investments did not perform as expected, our revenue growth would be limited and our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our common stock would be adversely affected.

We also generate income from the sale of our properties (including existing buildings, buildings which we have developed or re-developed on a merchant basis and land). The gain/loss on, and fees from, the sale of such properties are included in our income and can be a significant source of funds, in addition to revenues generated from rental income and tenant recoveries, for our operations. Currently, a significant portion of our proceeds from sales are being used to repay outstanding debt. Market conditions permitting, however, a significant portion of our proceeds from such sales may be used to fund the acquisition of existing, and the acquisition and development of new, industrial properties. The sale of properties is impacted, variously, by property specific, market specific, general economic and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. The sale of properties also entails various risks, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties. Further, our ability to sell properties is limited by safe harbor rules applying to REITs under the Code which relate to the number of properties that may be disposed of in a year, their tax bases and the cost of improvements made to the properties, along with other tests which enable a REIT to avoid punitive taxation on the sale of assets. If we are unable to sell properties on favorable terms, our income growth would be limited and our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our common stock could be adversely affected.

 

25


Table of Contents

We utilize a portion of the net sales proceeds from property sales, borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility, and proceeds from the issuance, when and as warranted, of additional debt and equity securities to refinance debt and finance future acquisitions and developments. Access to external capital on favorable terms plays a key role in our financial condition and results of operations, as it impacts our cost of capital and our ability and cost to refinance existing indebtedness as it matures and to fund acquisitions and developments or through the issuance, when and as warranted, of additional equity securities. Our ability to access external capital on favorable terms is dependent on various factors, including general market conditions, interest rates, credit ratings on our preferred stock and debt, the market’s perception of our growth potential, our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions and the market price of our capital stock. If we are unable to access external capital on favorable terms, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our common stock could be adversely affected.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe the following critical accounting policies relate to the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

 

   

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts which is based on estimates of potential losses which could result from the inability of our tenants to satisfy outstanding billings with us. The allowance for doubtful accounts is an estimate based on our assessment of the creditworthiness of our tenants.

 

   

We review our held-for-use properties on a continuous basis for possible impairment and provide a provision if impairments are determined. We utilize the guidelines established under the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (the “FASB”) guidance for accounting for the impairment of long lived assets to determine if impairment conditions exist. We review the expected undiscounted cash flows of the property to determine if there are any indications of impairment. If the expected undiscounted cash flows of a particular property are less than the net book basis of the property, we will recognize an impairment charge equal to the amount of carrying value of the property that exceeds the fair value of the property. Fair value is determined by discounting the future expected cash flows of the property. The preparation of the undiscounted cash flows and the calculation of fair value involve subjective assumptions such as estimated occupancy, rental rates, ultimate residual value and hold period. The discount rate used to present value the cash flows for determining fair value is also subjective.

 

   

Properties are classified as held for sale when all criteria within the FASB’s guidance relating to the disposal of long lived assets are met for such properties. When properties are classified as held for sale, we cease depreciating the properties and estimate the values of such properties and record them at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value, less costs to dispose. If circumstances arise that were previously considered unlikely, and, as a result, we decide not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, we will reclassify such property as held and used. We estimate the value of such property and measure it at the lower of its carrying amount (adjusted for any depreciation and amortization expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used) or fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell. Fair value of operational industrial properties is determined either by discounting the future expected cash flows of the property or by third party contract prices. The preparation of the discounted cash flows and the calculation of fair value involve subjective assumptions such as estimated occupancy, rental rates, ultimate residual value, hold period and discount rate. Fair value of land is primarily determined by members of management who are responsible for the individual markets where the land parcels are located, quotes from local brokers or by third party contract prices. The determination of the fair value of real estate assets is also highly subjective, especially in markets where there is a lack of recent comparable transactions.

 

   

We analyze our investments in Joint Ventures to determine whether the joint ventures should be accounted for under the equity method of accounting or consolidated into our financial statements based on standards set forth under the FASB’s guidance relating to the consolidation of variable interest entities. Based on the guidance set forth in these pronouncements, we do not consolidate any of

 

26


Table of Contents
 

our joint venture investments because either the joint venture has been determined to be a variable interest entity but we are not the primary beneficiary or the joint venture has been determined not to be a variable interest entity and we lack control of the joint venture. Our assessment of whether we are the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity involves the consideration of various factors including the form of our ownership interest, our representation on the entity’s governing body, the size of our investment and future cash flows of the entity.

 

   

On a continuous basis, we assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our investments in Joint Ventures may be impaired. An investment is impaired if our estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, and such decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment. Our estimates of fair value for each investment are based on a number of subjective assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, market rental rates and operating costs, the discount rate used to value the cash flows of the properties, the cap rate used to estimate the terminal value of the underlying properties and the discount rate used to value the Joint Ventures’ debt.

 

   

We capitalize (direct and certain indirect) costs incurred in developing, renovating, acquiring and rehabilitating real estate assets as part of the investment basis. During the land development and construction periods, we capitalize interest costs, real estate taxes and certain general and administrative costs of the personnel performing development, renovations or rehabilitation up to the time the property is substantially complete. The determination and calculation of certain costs requires estimates by us. Amounts included in capitalized costs are included in the investment basis of real estate assets.

 

   

We are engaged in the acquisition of individual properties as well as multi-property portfolios. We are required to allocate purchase price between land, building, tenant improvements, leasing commissions, in-place leases, tenant relationships and above and below market leases. Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) our estimate of fair market lease rents for each corresponding in-place lease. Acquired above and below market leases are amortized over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases as an adjustment to rental income. In-place lease and tenant relationship values for acquired properties are recorded based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value allocated to in-place lease intangible assets is amortized to depreciation and amortization expense over the remaining lease term of the respective lease. The value allocated to tenant relationships is amortized to depreciation and amortization expense over the expected term of the relationship, which includes an estimate of the probability of lease renewal and its estimated term. We also must allocate purchase price on multi-property portfolios to individual properties. The allocation of purchase price is based on our assessment of various characteristics of the markets where the property is located and the expected cash flows of the property.

 

   

In the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, significant management judgment is required to estimate our current and deferred income tax liabilities, and our compliance with REIT qualification requirements. Our estimates are based on our interpretation of tax laws. These estimates may have an impact on the income tax expense recognized. Adjustments may be required by a change in assessment of our deferred income tax assets and liabilities, changes due to audit adjustments by federal and state tax authorities, our inability to qualify as a REIT, and changes in tax laws. Adjustments required in any given period are included within the income tax provision.

 

   

In assessing the need for a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, we estimate future taxable income, considering the feasibility of ongoing tax planning strategies and the realizability of tax loss carryforwards. In the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or a

 

27


Table of Contents
 

portion of our deferred tax assets in the future, we would reduce such amounts through a charge to income in the period in which that determination is made. Conversely, if we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net carrying amounts, we would decrease the recorded valuation allowance through an increase to income in the period in which that determination is made.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2011 to Year Ended December 31, 2010

Our net loss available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s common stockholders and participating securities was $27.0 million and $222.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Basic and diluted net loss available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s common stockholders was $0.34 per share for the year ended December 31, 2011 and $3.53 per share for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The tables below summarize our revenues, property and construction expenses and depreciation and other amortization by various categories for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Same store properties are properties owned prior to January 1, 2010 and held as an operating property through December 31, 2011 and developments and redevelopments that were placed in service prior to January 1, 2010 or were substantially completed for the 12 months prior to January 1, 2010. Properties which are at least 75% occupied at acquisition are placed in service. All other properties are placed in service as they reach the earlier of a) stabilized occupancy (generally defined as 90% occupied), or b) one year subsequent to acquisition or development completion. Acquired properties are properties that were acquired subsequent to December 31, 2009 and held as an operating property through December 31, 2011. Sold properties are properties that were sold subsequent to December 31, 2009. (Re)Developments and land are land parcels and developments and redevelopments that were not: a) substantially complete 12 months prior to January 1, 2010 or b) stabilized prior to January 1, 2010. Other revenues are derived from the operations of our maintenance company, fees earned from our Joint Ventures and other miscellaneous revenues. Construction revenues and expenses represent revenues earned and expenses incurred in connection with certain subsidiaries of the Company acting as development manager to construct industrial properties. Other expenses are derived from the operations of our maintenance company and other miscellaneous regional expenses.

Our future financial condition and results of operations, including rental revenues, may be impacted by the future acquisition and sale of properties. Our future revenues and expenses may vary materially from historical rates.

For the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the occupancy rates of our same store properties were 86.0% and 82.7%, respectively.

 

     2011     2010     $ Change     % Change  
     ($ in 000’s)  

REVENUES

        

Same Store Properties

   $ 323,665      $ 326,473      $ (2,808     (0.9 )% 

Acquired Properties

     3,435        1,133        2,302        203.2

Sold Properties

     4,726        11,310        (6,584     (58.2 )% 

(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above

     867        675        192        28.4

Other

     5,074        8,799        (3,725     (42.3 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   
   $ 337,767      $ 348,390      $ (10,623     (3.0 )% 

Discontinued Operations

     (19,932     (27,481     7,549        (27.5 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Subtotal Revenues

   $ 317,835      $ 320,909      $ (3,074     (1.0 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Construction Revenues

     —          869        (869     (100.0 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total Revenues

   $ 317,835      $ 321,778      $ (3,943     (1.2 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

28


Table of Contents

Revenues from same store properties decreased $2.8 million due primarily to a decrease in lease cancelation fees and rental rates, offset by an increase in occupancy. Revenues from acquired properties increased $2.3 million due to the four industrial properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2009 totaling approximately 1.2 million square feet of GLA. Revenues from sold properties decreased $6.6 million due to the 49 industrial properties and one leased land parcel sold subsequent to December 31, 2009 totaling approximately 4.0 million square feet of GLA. Revenues from (re)developments and land increased $0.2 million primarily due to an increase in occupancy. Other revenues decreased $3.7 million due primarily to a decrease in fees earned from our Joint Ventures. Construction revenues decreased $0.9 million due to the substantial completion during 2010 of certain development projects for which we were acting in the capacity of development manager.

 

     2011     2010     $ Change     % Change  
     ($ in 000’s)  

PROPERTY AND CONSTRUCTION EXPENSES

        

Same Store Properties

   $ 102,230      $ 101,344      $ 886        0.9

Acquired Properties

     640        200        440        220.0

Sold Properties

     2,369        5,040        (2,671     (53.0 )% 

(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above

     970        1,153        (183     (15.9 )% 

Other

     11,039        12,735        (1,696     (13.3 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   
   $ 117,248      $ 120,472      $ (3,224     (2.7 )% 

Discontinued Operations

     (8,658     (11,821     3,163        (26.8 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Property Expenses

   $ 108,590      $ 108,651      $ (61     (0.1 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Construction Expenses

     —          507        (507     (100.0 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total Property and Construction Expenses

   $ 108,590      $ 109,158      $ (568     (0.5 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Property expenses include real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management, utilities, insurance and other property related expenses. Property expenses from same store properties remained relatively unchanged. Property expenses from acquired properties increased $0.4 million due to properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2009. Property expenses from sold properties decreased $2.7 million due to properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2009. Property expenses from (re)developments and land decreased $0.2 million due to a decrease in real estate tax expense and a decrease in bad debt expense. The $1.7 million decrease in other expense is primarily attributable to a decrease in compensation resulting from a reduction in employee headcount. Construction expenses decreased $0.5 million due to the substantial completion during 2010 of certain development projects for which we were acting in the capacity of development manager.

General and administrative expense decreased $6.0 million, or 22.4%, due primarily to a decrease in compensation expense resulting from the reduction in employee headcount that occurred in 2010, a decrease in rent expense resulting from a reduction in office space during 2011 and 2010, a decrease in lawsuit settlement expense and a decrease in franchise tax expense primarily due to the reversal of a state franchise tax reserve relating to the 1996-2001 tax years.

We committed to a plan to reduce organizational and overhead costs in October 2008 and have subsequently modified that plan with the goal of further reducing these costs. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized $1.6 million in restructuring charges to provide for costs associated with the termination of certain office leases ($1.2 million) and other costs ($0.4 million) associated with implementing our restructuring plan. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized $1.9 million in restructuring charges to provide for employee severance and benefits ($0.5 million), costs associated with the termination of certain office leases ($0.7 million) and other costs ($0.7 million) associated with implementing our restructuring plan.

On October 22, 2010, we amended our Old Credit Facility. In conjunction with the amendment, management identified a pool of real estate assets (the “Non-Strategic Assets”) that it intends to sell. At December 31, 2010, all of the Non-Strategic Assets, which consisted of 193 industrial properties comprising

 

29


Table of Contents

approximately 16.1 million square feet of GLA and land parcels comprising approximately 695 acres, were classified as held for sale (except one industrial property comprising 0.3 million square feet of GLA). An impairment charge of $185.4 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010 related to certain of the Non-Strategic Assets due to a reassessment of the hold period. The impairment charge was necessary in order to adjust the carrying value of the assets to fair market value less costs to sell. At December 31, 2011, there are 87 industrial properties comprising approximately 6.5 million square feet of GLA that no longer qualify to be classified as held for sale and as such, any impairment charge or reversal recorded during 2011 and 2010 is reflected in continuing operations. Additionally, any impairment charge or reversal related to a land parcel, whether held for sale or held for use, is reflected in continuing operations. The impairment reversal included in continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 of $8.8 million is primarily comprised of a reversal of impairment of $2.9 million relating to certain industrial properties and land parcels that no longer qualify for held for sale classification and $5.9 million relating to a sold land parcel.

In addition to the $185.4 million of impairment recorded related to the Non-Strategic Assets, in connection with our periodic review of the carrying values of our properties and the negotiation of a new lease, we recorded an impairment charge of $9.2 million during the first quarter of 2010 related to one property located in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

 

     2011     2010     $ Change     % Change  
     ($ in 000’s)  

DEPRECIATION AND OTHER AMORTIZATION

        

Same Store Properties

   $ 117,855      $ 128,137      $ (10,282     (8.0 )% 

Acquired Properties

     2,194        603        1,591        263.8

Sold Properties

     1,521        5,358        (3,837     (71.6 )% 

(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above

     753        498        255        51.2

Corporate Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment

     1,426        1,975        (549     (27.8 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   
   $ 123,749      $ 136,571      $ (12,822     (9.4 )% 

Discontinued Operations

     (2,145     (11,273     9,128        (81.0 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total Depreciation and Other Amortization

   $ 121,604      $ 125,298      $ (3,694     (2.9 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Depreciation and other amortization for same store properties decreased $10.3 million primarily due to the cessation of depreciation and amortization of the Non-Strategic Assets that qualified for held for sale classification during 2011 as well as accelerated depreciation and amortization taken during the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, attributable to certain tenants who terminated their lease early. Depreciation and other amortization from acquired properties increased $1.6 million due to properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2009. Depreciation and other amortization from sold properties decreased $3.8 million due to properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2009. Depreciation and other amortization for (re)developments and land and other increased $0.3 million due primarily to an increase in the substantial completion of developments. Corporate furniture, fixtures and equipment decreased $0.5 million primarily due to assets becoming fully depreciated.

Interest income decreased $0.4 million, or 10.1%, due primarily to a decrease in the weighted average mortgage loans receivable balance outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010.

Interest expense, inclusive of $0.1 million and $0.3 million of interest expense included in discontinued operations, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, decreased $6.0 million, or 5.6%, primarily due to a decrease in the weighted average debt balance outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2011 ($1,594.3 million) as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 ($1,867.8 million) and by an increase in capitalized interest for the year ended December 31, 2011 due to an increase in development activities, offset

 

30


Table of Contents

by an increase in the weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2011 (6.31%), as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 (5.68%).

Amortization of deferred financing costs increased $0.5 million, or 14.1%, due primarily to an increase in financing costs related to the amendment of our Old Credit Facility in October 2010.

In October 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement (the “Series F Agreement”) to mitigate our exposure to floating interest rates related to the coupon reset of the Company’s Series F Preferred Stock. The Series F Agreement has a notional value of $50.0 million and is effective from April 1, 2009 through October 1, 2013. The Series F Agreement fixes the 30-year U.S. Treasury rate at 5.2175%. We recorded $1.7 million in mark to market loss, inclusive of $0.6 million in swap payments, which is included in Mark-to-Market (Loss) Gain on Interest Rate Protection Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to $1.1 million in mark to market loss, inclusive of $0.5 million in swap payments, for the year ended December 31, 2010.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized a net loss from retirement of debt of $5.5 million due primarily to the early payoff of certain mortgage loans, the partial repurchase of certain series of our senior unsecured notes, the write-off of unamortized fees associated with the Old Credit Facility and a loss on a transfer of a property to a lender in satisfaction of a mortgage loan. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized a net loss from retirement of debt of $4.3 million due primarily to the redemption of our 2011 Notes.

Foreign currency exchange loss of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 relates to the wind-down of our operations in Canada. Foreign currency exchange loss of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 relates to the wind-down of our operations in Europe.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, Equity in Income of Joint Ventures was $1.0 million, as compared to Equity in Income of Joint Ventures of $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase of $0.3 million is due primarily to selling our equity interests in five joint ventures (the 2005 Development/Repositioning Joint Venture, the 2005 Core Joint Venture, the 2006 Net Lease Co-Investment Program, the 2006 Land/Development Joint Venture and the 2007 Canada Joint Venture) during 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2010, our pro rata share of net losses from two of the sold joint ventures of $2.3 million was offset by our pro rata share of net income from three of the sold joint ventures of $2.1 million.

The Gain on Sale of Joint Venture Interests of $11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 relates to the sale of our 10% equity interests in each of the 2005 Development/Repositioning Joint Venture, the 2005 Core Joint Venture, the 2006 Land/Development Joint Venture and the 2007 Canada Joint Venture to our joint venture partner on August 5, 2010. Additionally, the gain includes approximately $2.7 million of proceeds related to the separate sales of three industrial properties by the Joint Ventures during August and October 2010 for which, in accordance with the sale agreement, we were entitled to a final distribution.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, Gain on Change in Control of Interests relates to the acquisition of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture. The $0.7 million gain is the difference between our carrying value and fair value of our equity interest on the acquisition date.

Income tax provision (included in continuing operations, discontinued operations and gain on sale of real estate) decreased by $1.2 million, or 35.0% for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 primarily due to an increase in state taxes in 2010 due to a one time unfavorable court decision on business loss carryforwards in the State of Michigan in 2010 and gain on sale of joint venture interests in 2010, partially offset by an increase in gain on sale of real estate within our taxable REIT subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

31


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes certain information regarding the industrial properties included in discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

 

     2011     2010  
     ($ in 000’s)  

Total Revenues

   $ 19,932      $ 27,481   

Property Expenses

     (8,658     (11,821

Impairment of Real Estate

     (6,146     (81,648

Depreciation and Amortization

     (2,145     (11,273

Interest Expense

     (63     (268

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

     20,419        11,092   

Provision for Income Taxes

     (1,246     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

   $ 22,093      $ (66,437
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 reflects the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate relating to 36 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2011 and the results of operations of 46 industrial properties that were identified as held for sale at December 31, 2011. The impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2011 of $6.1 million relates to an impairment charge related to certain Non-Strategic assets that were either sold during the year or classified as held for sale at December 31, 2011.

Loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate relating to 13 industrial properties and one land parcel that generated ground rental revenue that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2010, the results of operations of 36 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2011 and the results of operations of the 46 industrial properties identified as held for sale at December 31, 2011. The impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 of $81.6 million relates to an impairment charge related to certain Non-Strategic assets that were either sold during the year or classified as held for sale at December 31, 2011.

The $1.4 million gain on sale of real estate for the year ended December 31, 2011 resulted from the sale of one land parcel that did not meet the criteria for inclusion in discontinued operations. The $0.9 million gain on sale of real estate for the year ended December 31, 2010 resulted from the sale of several land parcels that did not meet the criteria for inclusion in discontinued operations.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2010 to Year Ended December 31, 2009

Our net loss available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s common stockholders and participating securities was $222.5 million and $13.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Basic and diluted net loss available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s common stockholders were $3.53 per share for the year ended December 31, 2010 and $0.28 per share for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The tables below summarize our revenues, property and construction expenses and depreciation and other amortization by various categories for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Same store properties are properties owned prior to January 1, 2009 and held as an operating property through December 31, 2010 and developments and redevelopments that were placed in service prior to January 1, 2009 or were substantially completed for the 12 months prior to January 1, 2009. Properties which are at least 75% occupied at acquisition are placed in service. All other properties are placed in service as they reach the earlier of a) stabilized occupancy (generally defined as 90% occupied), or b) one year subsequent to acquisition or development completion. Acquired properties are properties that were acquired subsequent to December 31, 2008 and held as an operating property through December 31, 2010. Sold properties are properties that were sold subsequent to December 31, 2008. (Re)Developments and land are land parcels and developments and redevelopments that were not: a) substantially complete 12 months prior to January 1, 2009 or b) stabilized prior

 

32


Table of Contents

to January 1, 2009. Other revenues are derived from the operations of our maintenance company, fees earned from our Joint Ventures and other miscellaneous revenues. Construction revenues and expenses represent revenues earned and expenses incurred in connection with the taxable REIT subsidiaries acting as development manager to construct industrial properties and also include revenues and expenses related to the development and sale of properties built for third parties. Other expenses are derived from the operations of our maintenance company and other miscellaneous regional expenses.

Our future financial condition and results of operations, including rental revenues, may be impacted by the future acquisition and sale of properties. Our future revenues and expenses may vary materially from historical rates.

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the occupancy rates of our same store properties were 83.1% and 83.5%, respectively.

 

     2010     2009     $ Change     % Change  
     ($ in 000’s)  

REVENUES

        

Same Store Properties

   $ 325,280      $ 331,917      $ (6,637     (2.0 )% 

Acquired Properties

     1,133        —          1,133        —     

Sold Properties

     1,314        9,944        (8,630     (86.8 )% 

(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above

     11,870        7,044        4,826        68.5

Other

     8,793        17,560        (8,767     (49.9 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   
   $ 348,390      $ 366,465      $ (18,075     (4.9 )% 

Discontinued Operations

     (27,481     (36,850     9,369        (25.4 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Subtotal Revenues

   $ 320,909      $ 329,615      $ (8,706     (2.6 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Construction Revenues

     869        54,957        (54,088     (98.4 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total Revenues

   $ 321,778      $ 384,572      $ (62,794     (16.3 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Revenues from same store properties decreased $6.6 million due primarily to a decrease in rental rates and a decrease in occupancy. Revenues from acquired properties increased $1.1 million due to the three industrial properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2008 totaling approximately 0.5 million square feet of GLA. Revenues from sold properties decreased $8.6 million due to the 28 industrial properties and one leased land parcel sold subsequent to December 31, 2008 totaling approximately 3.0 million square feet of GLA. Revenues from (re)developments and land increased $4.8 million primarily due to an increase in occupancy. Other revenues decreased $8.8 million due primarily to a decrease in fees earned from our Joint Ventures. Construction revenues decreased $54.1 million primarily due to the substantial completion during 2010 and 2009 of certain development projects for which we were acting in the capacity of development manager.

 

33


Table of Contents

 

     2010     2009     $ Change     % Change  
     ($ in 000’s)  

PROPERTY AND CONSTRUCTION EXPENSES

        

Same Store Properties

   $ 103,148      $ 105,341      $ (2,193     (2.1 )% 

Acquired Properties

     200        —          200        —     

Sold Properties

     713        2,940        (2,227     (75.7 )% 

(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above

     3,676        3,736        (60     (1.6 )% 

Other

     12,735        14,229        (1,494     (10.5 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   
   $ 120,472      $ 126,246      $ (5,774     (4.6 )% 

Discontinued Operations

     (11,821     (14,966     3,145        (21.0 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Property Expenses

   $ 108,651      $ 111,280      $ (2,629     (2.4 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Construction Expenses

     507        52,720        (52,213     (99.0 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total Property and Construction Expenses

   $ 109,158      $ 164,000      $ (54,842     (33.4 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Property expenses include real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management, utilities, insurance and other property related expenses. Property expenses from same store properties decreased $2.2 million due primarily to a decrease in bad debt expense. Property expenses from acquired properties increased $0.2 million due to properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2008. Property expenses from sold properties decreased $2.2 million due to properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2008. Property expenses from (re)developments and land remained relatively unchanged. The $1.5 million decrease in other expense is primarily attributable to a decrease in compensation. Construction expenses decreased $52.2 million primarily due to the substantial completion during 2010 and 2009 of certain development projects for which we were acting in the capacity of development manager.

General and administrative expense decreased $11.2 million, or 29.7%, due primarily to a decrease in compensation resulting from the reduction in employee headcount occurring in 2009 and 2010, a decrease in rent expense resulting from office closings in 2009 and 2010 and a decrease in legal and professional services, partially offset by an increase in lawsuit settlements.

We committed to a plan to reduce organizational and overhead costs in October 2008 and have subsequently modified that plan with the goal of further reducing these costs. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized $1.9 million in restructuring charges to provide for employee severance and benefits ($0.5 million), costs associated with the termination of certain office leases ($0.7 million) and other costs ($0.7 million) associated with implementing our restructuring plan. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded as restructuring costs a pre-tax charge of $7.8 million to provide for employee severance and benefits ($5.2 million), costs associated with the termination of certain office leases ($1.9 million) and other costs ($0.7 million) associated with implementing the restructuring plan.

On October 22, 2010, we amended our Old Credit Facility. In conjunction with the amendment, management identified a pool of real estate assets (the “Non-Strategic Assets”) that it intends to sell. At December 31, 2010, all of the Non-Strategic Assets, which consisted of 193 industrial properties comprising approximately 16.1 million square feet of GLA and land parcels comprising approximately 695 acres, were classified as held for sale (except one industrial property comprising 0.3 million square feet of GLA). An impairment charge of $185.4 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010 related to certain of the Non-Strategic Assets due to a reassessment of the hold period. The impairment charge was necessary in order to adjust the carrying value of the assets to fair market value less costs to sell. At December 31, 2011, there are 87 industrial properties comprising approximately 6.5 million square feet of GLA that no longer qualify to be classified as held for sale and as such, any impairment charge or reversal recorded during 2011 and 2010 is reflected in continuing operations. Additionally, any impairment charge or reversal related to a land parcel, whether held for sale or held for use, is reflected in continuing operations. The impairment charge of $112.9 million included in

 

34


Table of Contents

continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 is primarily comprised of $104.6 million relating to certain industrial properties and land parcels that no longer qualify for held for sale classification and $8.3 million relating to sold land parcels.

As a result of adverse conditions in the credit and real estate markets, we recorded an impairment charge of $6.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2009 related to one property in the Inland Empire market ($1.3 million of this impairment charge is included in discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 because one building of the two-building property was sold during the year ended December 31, 2011).

 

     2010     2009     $ Change     % Change  
     ($ in 000’s)  

DEPRECIATION AND OTHER AMORTIZATION

        

Same Store Properties

   $ 128,089      $ 138,313      $ (10,224     (7.4 )% 

Acquired Properties

     603        —          603        —     

Sold Properties

     664        4,798        (4,134     (86.2 )% 

(Re) Developments and Land, Not Included Above

     5,240        4,560        680        14.9

Corporate Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment

     1,975        2,192        (217     (9.9 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   
   $ 136,571      $ 149,863      $ (13,292     (8.9 )% 

Discontinued Operations

     (11,273     (17,992     6,719        (37.3 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total Depreciation and Other Amortization

   $ 125,298      $ 131,871      $ (6,573     (5.0 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Depreciation and other amortization for same store properties decreased $10.2 million due primarily to accelerated depreciation and amortization taken during the year ended December 31, 2009 attributable to the cessation of depreciation and amortization of the Non-Strategic Assets that qualified for held for sale classification during the fourth quarter of 2010 as well as to certain tenants who terminated their leases early. Depreciation and other amortization from acquired properties increased $0.6 million due to properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2008. Depreciation and other amortization from sold properties decreased $4.1 million due to properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2008. Depreciation and other amortization for (re)developments and land and other increased $0.7 million due primarily to an increase in the substantial completion of developments. Corporate furniture, fixtures and equipment decreased $0.2 million primarily due to accelerated depreciation on furniture, fixtures and equipment taken in 2009 related to the termination of certain office leases.

Interest income increased $1.3 million, or 41.5%, due primarily to an increase in the weighted average mortgage loans receivable balance outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009.

Interest expense, inclusive of $0.3 million and $0.7 million of interest expense included in discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, decreased $9.3 million, or 8.0%, primarily due to a decrease in the weighted average debt balance outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2010 ($1,867.8 million), as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009 ($2,050.5 million), offset by an increase in the weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 (5.68%), as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009 (5.64%) and by a decrease in capitalized interest for the year ended December 31, 2010 due to a decrease in development activities.

Amortization of deferred financing costs increased $0.4 million, or 14.6%, due primarily to an increase in costs related to the amendment of our Old Credit Facility in October 2010 and the origination of mortgage financings during 2010 and 2009, partially offset by expensing of capitalized loan fees as a result of the repurchase and retirement of certain of our senior unsecured notes. The net unamortized deferred financing fees related to the prior line of credit are amortized over the remaining amortization period, except for $0.2 million of unamortized deferred financing costs that were expensed as a result of the decrease in the capacity of the Old Credit Facility, which is included in (Loss) Gain From Retirement of Debt for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

35


Table of Contents

We recorded $1.1 million in mark to market loss, inclusive of $0.5 million in swap payments, related to the Series F Agreement which is included in Mark-to-Market (Loss) Gain on Interest Rate Protection Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $2.7 million in mark to market gain, inclusive of $0.5 million of swap payments, for the year ended December 31, 2009. Additionally included in Mark-to-Market Gain on Interest Rate Protection Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2009 is $1.0 million related to two forward starting swaps. In January 2008, we entered into two forward starting swaps each with a notional value of $59.8 million, which fixed the interest rate on forecasted debt offerings. We designated both swaps as cash flow hedges. The rates on the forecasted debt issuances underlying the swaps locked on March 20, 2009 (the “Forward Starting Agreement 1”) and on April 6, 2009 (the “Forward Starting Agreement 2”), and as such, the swaps ceased to qualify for hedge accounting. The change in value of Forward Starting Agreement 1 and Forward Starting Agreement 2 from the respective day the interest rate on the underlying debt locked until settlement was $1.0 million and is included in Mark-to-Market (Loss) Gain on Interest Rate Protection Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2009.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized a net loss from retirement of debt of $4.3 million due primarily to the redemption of our 2011 Notes. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized a $34.6 million gain from retirement of debt due to the partial repurchase of certain series of our senior unsecured notes.

Foreign currency exchange loss of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 relates to our wind-down of our operations in Europe.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, Equity in Income of Joint Ventures was $0.7 million, as compared to Equity in Loss of Joint Ventures of $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The variance of $7.2 million is due primarily to impairment losses of $5.6 million we recorded during the year ended December 31, 2009 related to the 2006 Net Lease Co-Investment Program as a result of adverse conditions in the credit and real estate markets and also due to the gain on sale of our 15% interest in the 2006 Net Lease Co-Investment Program which occurred during the year ended December 31, 2010, partially offset by a decrease in our pro rata share of gain on sale of real estate and earn outs on property sales from the 2005 Development/Repositioning Joint Venture and a decrease in our pro rata share of income from the 2005 Core Joint Venture during the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009.

The Gain on Sale of Joint Venture Interests of $11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 relates to the sale of our 10% equity interests in each of the 2005 Development/Repositioning Joint Venture, the 2005 Core Joint Venture, the 2006 Land/Development Joint Venture and the 2007 Canada Joint Venture to our joint venture partner on August 5, 2010. Additionally, the gain includes approximately $2.7 million of proceeds related to the separate sales of three industrial properties by the Joint Ventures during August and October 2010 for which, in accordance with the sale agreement, we were entitled to a final distribution.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded an income tax provision of $3.3 million, as compared to an income tax benefit of $23.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The variance of $26.5 million is due primarily to a loss carryback generated from the tax liquidation of one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase in state taxes related to an unfavorable court decision on business loss carryforwards in the State of Michigan for the year ended December 31, 2010 and gain on sale of joint venture interests in 2010.

 

36


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes certain information regarding the industrial properties included in discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

 

     2010     2009  
     ($ in 000’s)  

Total Revenues

   $ 27,481      $ 36,850   

Property Expenses

     (11,821     (14,966

Impairment of Real Estate

     (81,648     (1,317

Depreciation and Amortization

     (11,273     (17,992

Interest Expense

     (268     (653

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

     11,092        24,206   

Provision for Income Taxes

     —          (1,846
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) Income from Discontinued Operations

   $ (66,437   $ 24,282   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate relating to 13 industrial properties and one land parcel that generated ground rental revenue that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2010, the results of operations of 36 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2011 and the results of operations of 46 industrial properties that were identified as held for sale at December 31, 2011. The impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 of $81.6 million relates to an impairment charge related to certain Non-Strategic assets that were either sold during the year or classified as held for sale at December 31, 2011.

Income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 reflects the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate relating to 15 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2009, the results of operations of 13 industrial properties and one land parcel that generated ground rental revenue that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2010, the results of operations of 36 industrial properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2011 and the results of operations of the 46 industrial properties identified as held for sale at December 31, 2011. The impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 of $1.3 million relates to an impairment charge recorded related to one sold property in the Inland Empire market. The impairment charge was a result of adverse conditions in the credit and real estate markets.

The $0.9 million and $0.4 million gain on sale of real estate for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, resulted from the sale of several land parcels that do not meet the criteria for inclusion in discontinued operations.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At December 31, 2011 our cash and cash equivalents was approximately $10.2 million. We also had $300.5 million available for additional borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility, subject to certain restrictions.

We have considered our short-term (through December 31, 2012) liquidity needs and the adequacy of our estimated cash flow from operations and other expected liquidity sources to meet these needs. Our 2012 Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $61.8 million, are due on April 15, 2012. We expect to satisfy the payment obligations on the 2012 Notes with borrowings on our Unsecured Credit Facility. With the exception of the 2012 Notes, we believe that our principal short-term liquidity needs are to fund normal recurring expenses, property acquisitions, developments, renovations, expansions and other nonrecurring capital improvements, debt service requirements and the minimum distributions required to maintain our REIT qualification under the Code. We anticipate that these needs will be met with cash flows provided by operating and investing activities, including the disposition of select assets.

 

37


Table of Contents

We expect to meet long-term (after December 31, 2012) liquidity requirements such as property acquisitions, developments, scheduled debt maturities, major renovations, expansions and other nonrecurring capital improvements through the disposition of select assets, long-term unsecured and secured indebtedness and the issuance of additional equity securities, subject to market conditions.

We also have financed the development or acquisition of additional properties through borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility and may finance the development or acquisition of additional properties through such borrowings, to the extent capacity is available, in the future. At December 31, 2011, borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility bore interest at a weighted average interest rate of 2.385%. As of February 28, 2012, we had approximately $262.4 million available for additional borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Facility, subject to certain restrictions. Our Unsecured Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants including limitations on incurrence of debt and debt service coverage. Our access to borrowings may be limited if we fail to meet any of these covenants. We believe that we were in compliance with our financial covenants as of December 31, 2011, and we anticipate that we will be able to operate in compliance with our financial covenants in 2012.

Our senior unsecured notes have been assigned credit ratings from Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch Ratings of BB-/Ba3/BB, respectively. In the event of a downgrade, we believe we would continue to have access to sufficient capital; however, our cost of borrowing would increase and our ability to access certain financial markets may be limited.

Year Ended December 31, 2011

Net cash provided by operating activities of approximately $87.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 was comprised primarily of the non-cash adjustments of approximately $111.7 million, operating distributions received in excess of equity in income of joint ventures of $0.1 million and a decrease in restricted cash of approximately $0.1 million, offset by net loss of approximately $9.2 million, payments of discounts associated with senior unsecured notes of $5.3 million, prepayment premiums associated with the retirement of debt of approximately $1.3 million and net change in operating assets and liabilities of approximately $8.6 million. The adjustments for the non-cash items of approximately $111.7 million are primarily comprised of depreciation and amortization of approximately $136.3 million, the provision for bad debt of approximately $1.1 million, the loss from retirement of debt of approximately $5.5 million and the mark to market loss related to the Series F Agreement of approximately $1.7 million, offset by the reversal of impairment of real estate of $2.7 million, the gain on sale of real estate of approximately $21.8 million, the gain on the change in control of interests in connection with the redemption of the 85% equity interest in one property from the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture of approximately $0.7 million and the effect of the straight-lining of rental income of approximately $7.7 million.

Net cash used in investing activities of approximately $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 was comprised primarily of the acquisition of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture development of real estate, capital expenditures related to the improvement of existing real estate and payments related to leasing activities, offset by the net proceeds from the sale of real estate and the repayments on our mortgage loan receivables.

We invested approximately $0.2 million in, and received total distributions of approximately $1.7 million, from our Joint Ventures. As of December 31, 2011, our Joint Ventures owned seven industrial properties comprising approximately 3.4 million square feet of GLA.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we sold 36 industrial properties comprising approximately 2.9 million square feet of GLA and one land parcel. Proceeds from the sales of the 36 industrial properties and one land parcel, net of closing costs, were approximately $76.0 million. We are in various stages of discussions with third parties for the sale of additional properties and plan to continue to selectively market other properties

 

38


Table of Contents

for sale throughout 2012. We expect to use at least a portion of sale proceeds to pay down additional debt. If we are unable to sell properties on an advantageous basis, this may impair our liquidity and our ability to meet our financial covenants.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we acquired one industrial property comprising approximately 0.7 million square feet of GLA in connection with the redemption of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture. The acquisition was funded with a cash payment of $5.3 million and the assumption of a mortgage loan in the amount of $24.4 million.

Net cash used in financing activities of approximately $99.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 was comprised primarily of repayments on our senior unsecured notes and mortgage loans payable, payments of debt and equity issuance costs, net repayments on our Unsecured Credit Facility, preferred stock dividends, the repurchase and retirement of restricted stock and payments on the interest rate swap agreement offset by the net proceeds from the issuance of common stock and proceeds from the new mortgage financings.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we received proceeds from the origination of $255.9 million in mortgage loans. The mortgage loans bear interest at a fixed rate between 4.45% and 4.85% and mature between June 2018 and October 2021. We may engage various lenders, from time to time, regarding the origination of additional mortgage financings and the terms and conditions thereof. To the extent additional mortgage financing is originated, we expect to use proceeds received to pay down our other debt and/or make select property acquisitions. No assurances can be made that additional mortgage financing will be obtained.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we redeemed or repurchased $241.7 million of our unsecured notes at an aggregate purchase price of $239.6 million. We may from time to time repay additional amounts of our outstanding debt. Any repayments would depend upon prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors we consider important. Future repayments may materially impact our liquidity, taxable income and results of operations.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we issued 17,415,856 shares of the Company’s common stock under the ATM and underwritten public offerings, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $202.8 million. We may access the equity markets again, subject to contractual restrictions and market conditions. To the extent additional equity offerings occur, we expect to use at least a portion of the proceeds received to reduce our indebtedness or make property acquisitions.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table lists our contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

 

            Payments Due by Period  
     Total      Less Than
1 Year
     1-3 Years      3-5 Years      Over 5 Years  

Operating and Ground Leases(1)

   $ 35,756       $ 1,892       $ 3,172       $ 2,640       $ 28,052   

Long-term Debt

     1,483,803         74,518         318,227         355,555         735,503   

Interest Expense on Long-Term Debt(1)(2)

     569,752         81,249         152,524         114,198         221,781   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,089,311       $ 157,659       $ 473,923       $ 472,393       $ 985,336   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Not on balance sheet.
(2) Does not include interest expense on our Unsecured Credit Facility.

 

39


Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Letters of credit are issued in most cases as pledges to governmental entities for development purposes. At December 31, 2011, we have $0.8 million in outstanding letters of credit. Additionally, we have $6.0 million in performance bonds outstanding at December 31, 2011. The letters of credit and performance bonds are not reflected as liabilities on our balance sheet. We have no other off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303 of Regulation S-K, other than those disclosed on the Contractual Obligations and Commitments table above, that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operation or liquidity and capital resources.

Environmental

We paid approximately $1.1 million and $0.6 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to environmental expenditures. We estimate 2012 expenditures of approximately $1.2 million. We estimate that the aggregate expenditures which need to be expended in 2012 and beyond with regard to currently identified environmental issues will not exceed approximately $2.6 million.

Inflation

For the last several years, inflation has not had a significant impact on the Company because of the relatively low inflation rates in our markets of operation. Most of our leases require the tenants to pay their share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation. In addition, many of the outstanding leases expire within six years which may enable us to replace existing leases with new leases at higher base rentals if rents of existing leases are below the then-existing market rate.

Market Risk

The following discussion about our risk-management activities includes “forward-looking statements” that involve risk and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Our business subjects us to market risk from interest rates, and to a much lesser extent, foreign currency fluctuations.

Interest Rate Risk

This analysis presents the hypothetical gain or loss in earnings, cash flows or fair value of the financial instruments and derivative instruments which are held by us at December 31, 2011 that are sensitive to changes in the interest rates. While this analysis may have some use as a benchmark, it should not be viewed as a forecast.

In the normal course of business, we also face risks that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable. Such risks principally include credit risk and legal risk and are not represented in the following analysis.

At December 31, 2011, approximately $1,330.5 million (approximately 89.9% of total debt at December 31, 2011) of our debt was fixed rate debt and approximately $149.0 million (approximately 10.1% of total debt at December 31, 2011) was variable rate debt. Currently, we do not enter into financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.

For fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair value of the debt, but not our earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for variable rate debt, changes in the base interest rate used to calculate the all-in interest rate generally do not impact the fair value of the debt, but would affect our future earnings and cash flows. The interest rate risk and changes in fair market value of fixed rate debt generally do not have a significant impact on us until we are required to refinance such debt. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the maturity dates of our various fixed rate debt.

 

40


Table of Contents

Based upon the amount of variable rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2011, a 10% increase or decrease in the interest rate on our variable rate debt would decrease or increase, respectively, future net income and cash flows by approximately $0.4 million per year. The foregoing calculation assumes an instantaneous increase or decrease in the rates applicable to the amount of borrowings outstanding under our Unsecured Credit Facility at December 31, 2011. Changes in LIBOR could result in a greater than 10% increase in such rates. In addition, the calculation does not account for our option to elect the lower of two different interest rates under our borrowings or other possible actions, such as prepayment, that we might take in response to any rate increase. A 10% increase in interest rates would decrease the fair value of the fixed rate debt at December 31, 2011 by approximately $36.7 million to $1,337.3 million. A 10% decrease in interest rates would increase the fair value of the fixed rate debt at December 31, 2011 by approximately $38.9 million to $1,412.9 million.

The use of derivative financial instruments allows us to manage risks of increases in interest rates with respect to the effect these fluctuations would have on our earnings and cash flows. As of December 31, 2011, we had one outstanding derivative with a notional amount of $50.0 million which mitigates our exposure to floating interest rates related to the reset rate of our Series F Preferred Stock.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Owning, operating and developing industrial property outside of the United States exposes us to the possibility of volatile movements in foreign exchange rates. Changes in foreign currencies can affect the operating results of international operations reported in U.S. dollars and the value of the foreign assets reported in U.S. dollars. The economic impact of foreign exchange rate movements is complex because such changes are often linked to variability in real growth, inflation, interest rates, governmental actions and other factors. At December 31, 2011, we owned one land parcel for which the U.S. dollar was not the functional currency. The land parcel is located in Ontario, Canada and uses the Canadian dollar as its functional currency.

Supplemental Earnings Measure

Investors in and industry analysts following the real estate industry utilize funds from operations (“FFO”) as a supplemental operating performance measure of an equity REIT. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time through depreciation. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry analysts and investors prefer to supplement operating results that use historical cost accounting. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) created FFO as a supplemental measure of REIT operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation, among other items, from net income determined in accordance with GAAP. FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure. FFO available to common stockholders and participating securities should not be considered as a substitute for its most comparable GAAP measure, net income (loss) available to common stockholders and participating securities, or any other measures derived in accordance with GAAP. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. FFO is calculated by us in accordance with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of NAREIT and therefore may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

Management believes that the use of FFO available to common stockholders and participating securities, combined with net income (which remains the primary measure of performance), improves the understanding of operating results of REITs among the investing public and makes comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful. Management believes that, by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated real estate assets, real estate asset depreciation and amortization and impairment write-downs taken on previously depreciated real estate, investors and analysts are able to identify the operating results of the long-term assets that form the core of a REIT’s activity and assist in comparing these operating results between periods or to those of different companies.

 

41


Table of Contents

The following table shows a reconciliation of net income (loss) available to common stockholders and participating securities to the calculation of FFO available to common stockholders and participating securities for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2011     2010     2009  
     (In thousands except per share data)  
      

Net Loss Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders and Participating Securities

   $ (27,010   $ (222,498   $ (13,783

Adjustments:

      

Depreciation and Other Amortization of Real Estate

     120,178        123,323        129,679   

Depreciation and Other Amortization of Real Estate Included in Discontinued Operations

     2,145        11,273        17,992   

Company Share of Joint Venture Depreciation and Other Amortization

     551        947        4,994   

Impairment of Depreciated Real Estate

     (1,687     90,204        5,617   

Impairment of Depreciated Real Estate Included in Discontinued Operations

     6,146        81,648        1,317   

Gain on Sale of Depreciated Real Estate

     (20,419     (11,073     (24,231

Company Share of Joint Venture Gain on Sale of Depreciated Real Estate

     (616     (231     (74

Gain on Change in Control of Interests

     (689    

Noncontrolling Interest Share of Adjustments

     (6,448     (23,067     (13,759
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Funds from Operations Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders and Participating Securities

   $ 72,151      $ 50,526      $ 107,752   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subsequent Events

From January 1, 2012 to February 28, 2012, we acquired one industrial property comprising approximately 0.4 million square feet of GLA in connection with the purchase of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture. The acquisition was funded through the assumption of a mortgage loan in the amount of $12.0 million, which was subsequently paid off at closing and a cash payment of $8.3 million. We will account for this transaction as a step acquisition utilizing the purchase method of accounting. There were no industrial properties sold during this time.

From January 1, 2012 to February 28, 2012, we repurchased and retired $0.4 million of our senior unsecured notes maturing in 2028 for a payment of $0.4 million.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Response to this item is included in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” above.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule included in Item 15.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

 

42


Table of Contents

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports pursuant to the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria described in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2011, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein within Item 15. See Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

On February 27, 2012, the Company, in its capacity as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and owner of greater than 90% of all Units, amended and restated the Eleventh Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, effective March 17, 2012, in order to permit a merger of the Operating Partnership to be authorized by the vote of a majority of Units, make technical amendments of the agreement’s Unit issuance and general partnership interest transfer and succession provisions in the event of certain Company transactions and to expand the notice requirements under the agreement in the event of an amendment. The foregoing summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Twelfth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.1, to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

43


Table of Contents

PART III

 

Item 10, 11, 12, 13 and  14.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters, Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence and Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by Item 10, Item 11, Item 12, Item 13 and Item 14 is hereby incorporated or furnished, solely to the extent required by such item, from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which is expected to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year. Information from the Company’s definitive proxy statement shall not be deemed to be “filed” or “soliciting material,” or subject to liability for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to the maximum extent permitted under the Exchange Act.

 

44


Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedule and Exhibits

(1 & 2) See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule.

(3) Exhibits:

 

Exhibits

  

Description

  3.1    Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
  3.2    Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, dated September 4, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 of the Company’s Form 8-K, dated September 4, 1997, as filed on September 29, 1997, File No. 1-13102)
  3.3    Articles of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, dated June 20, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
  3.4    Articles of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, dated May 31, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
  3.5    Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s 6.236% Series F Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
  3.6    Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s 7.236% Series G Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
  3.7    Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of Form S-3 of the Company and First Industrial, L.P. dated September 24, 1997, Registration No. 333-29879)
  3.8    Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s 7.25% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed January 17, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
  3.9    Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s 7.25% Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.6 of the Form 8-A of the Company, as filed on August 18, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
  3.10    Articles of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, dated May 12, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed June 2, 2011, File No. 1-13102)
  4.1    Deposit Agreement, dated May 27, 2004, by and among the Company, EquiServe Inc. and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. and holders from time to time of Series F Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)

 

45


Table of Contents

Exhibits

  

Description

  4.2    Deposit Agreement, dated May 27, 2004, by and among the Company, EquiServe Inc. and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. and holders from time to time of Series G Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
  4.3    Remarketing Agreement, dated May 27, 2004, relating to 50,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100 of a share of the Series F Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, by and among Lehman Brothers Inc., the Company and First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 of the Form 8-K of the Company, dated May 27, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
  4.4    Remarketing Agreement, dated May 27,2004, relating to 25,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100 of a share of the Series G Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, by and among Lehman Brothers Inc., the Company and First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.3 of the Form 8-K of the Company, dated May 27, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
  4.5    Deposit Agreement, dated January 13,2006, by and among the Company, Computershare Shareholder Services, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as depositary, and holders from time to time of Series J Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, filed January 17, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
  4.6    Deposit Agreement, dated August 21, 2006, by and among the Company, Computershare Shareholder Services, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as depositary, and holders from time to time of Series K Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.7 of the Form 8-A of the Company, as filed on August 18, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
  4.7    Indenture, dated as of May 13, 1997,between First Industrial, L.P. and First Trust National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1997, as amended by Form 10-Q/A No. 1 of the Company filed May 30, 1997, File No. 1-13102)
  4.8    Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of May 13, 1997, between First Industrial, L.P. and First Trust National Association as Trustee relating to $100 million of 7.15% Notes due 2027 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1997, as amended by Form 10-Q/A No. 1 of the Company filed May 30, 1997, File No. 1-13102)
  4.9    Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated October 28, 1997 between First Industrial, L.P. and First Trust National Association providing for the issuance of Medium-Term Notes due Nine Months or more from Date of Issue (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P., dated November 3, 1997, as filed November 3, 1997, File No. 333-21873)
  4.10    7.50% Medium-Term Note due 2017 in principal amount of $100 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 1-13102)
  4.11    Trust Agreement, dated as of May 16, 1997, between First Industrial, L.P. and First Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Form 10-Q of First Industrial, L.P. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1997, File No. 333-21873)
  4.12    7.60% Notes due 2028 in principal amount of $200 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P. dated July 15, 1998, File No. 333-21873)
  4.13    Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of July 14, 1998, between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, relating to First Industrial, L.P.’s 7.60% Notes due July 15, 2028 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P. dated July 15, 1998, File No. 333-21873)

 

46


Table of Contents

Exhibits

  

Description

  4.14    Supplemental Indenture No. 7 dated as of April 15, 2002, between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association, relating to First Industrial, L.P.’s 6.875% Notes due 2012 and 7.75% Notes due 2032 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P. dated April 4, 2002, File No. 333-21873)
  4.15    Form of 6.875% Notes due in 2012 in the principal amount of $200 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P., dated April 4, 2002, File No. 333-21873)
  4.16    Form of 7.75% Notes due 2032 in the principal amount of $50.0 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P., dated April 4, 2002, File No. 333-21873)
  4.17    Supplemental Indenture No. 8, dated as of May 17, 2004, relating to 6.42% Senior Notes due June 1, 2014, by and between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P., dated May 27, 2004, File No. 333-21873)
  4.18    Supplemental Indenture No. 10, dated as of January 10, 2006, relating to 5.75% Senior Notes due 2016, by and between the Operating Partnership and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, filed January 11, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
  4.19    Supplemental Indenture No. 11, dated as of May 7, 2007, relating to 5.95% Senior Notes due 2017, by and between the Operating Partnership and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, filed May 5, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.1*    Twelfth Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of First Industrial, L.P. dated February 27, 2012 and effective March 17, 2012 (the “LP Agreement”).
10.2    Sales Agreement by and among the Company, First Industrial, L.P. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. dated September 16, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, dated September 16, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
10.3    Non-Competition Agreement between Jay H. Shidler and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 1-13102)
10.4    Form of Non-Competition Agreement between each of Michael T. Tomasz, Paul T. Lambert, Michael J. Havala, Michael W. Brennan, Michael G. Damone, Duane H. Lund, and Johannson L. Yap and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-77804)
10.5†    1994 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 1-13102)
10.6†    First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. Deferred Income Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
10.7    Contribution Agreement, dated March 19, 1996, among FR Acquisitions, Inc. and the parties listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, dated April 3, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
10.8    Contribution Agreement, dated January 31, 1997, among FR Acquisitions, Inc. and the parties listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.58 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, File No. 1-13102)

 

47


Table of Contents

Exhibits

  

Description

10.9†    Separation and Release Agreement between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and Michael W. Brennan dated November 26, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed November 28, 2008, File No. 1-13102)
10.10†    1997 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.62 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
10.11†    2001 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, File No. 1-13102)
10.12†    Separation and Release Agreement between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and Michael J. Havala dated December 22, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed December 23, 2008, File No. 1-13102)
10.13†    Employment Agreement, dated March 31, 2002, between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and Johannson L. Yap (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 10-Q of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2002, File No. 1-13102)
10.14†    Separation and Release Agreement between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and David P. Draft dated November 25, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed November 28, 2008, File No. 1-13102)
10.15†    Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
10.16†    Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
10.17†    Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
10.18†    Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
10.19    Unsecured Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of December 14, 2011 among First Industrial, L.P., First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and the other lenders thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed December 15, 2011, File No. 1-13102)
10.20†    Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Director’s Annual Retainer) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed May 19, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
10.21†    Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
10.22†    Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.23†    Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.24†    Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-13102)

 

48


Table of Contents

Exhibits

  

Description

10.25†    Form of Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.26†    Form of Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.27†    Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.28†    Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.29†    Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, File No. 1-13102)
10.30†    Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, File No. 1-13102)
10.31†    First Amendment, dated as of December 29, 2008, to Employment Agreement, dated March 31, 2002, between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and Johannson L. Yap (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 1-13102)
10.32†    Employment Agreement dated as of January 9, 2009 among First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., First Industrial L.P. and Bruce W. Duncan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed January 12, 2009, File No. 1-13102)
10.33†    Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated as of January 9, 2009 between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and Bruce W. Duncan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed January 12, 2009, File No. 1-13102)
10.34†    2009 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, File No. 1-13102)
10.35†    Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed July 15, 2009, File No. 1-13102)
10.36†    Amendment No. 1, dated as of February 5, 2009, to the Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2009, by and between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and Bruce W. Duncan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, File No. 1-13102)
10.37†    Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed March 4, 2010, File No. 1-13102)
10.38    Distribution Agreement among the First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., First Industrial, L.P. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. dated May 4, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed May 4, 2010, File No. 1-13102)
10.39†    Form of Employee Service Based Bonus Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed July 7, 2010, File No. 1-13102)

 

49


Table of Contents

Exhibits

 

Description

10.40†   Form of Employee Service Based Bonus Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed July 13, 2011, File No. 1-13102)
10.41†   2011 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 2, 2011, File No. 1-13102)
10.42†   Amendment No. 1 to 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, dated April 28, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed on April 28, 2011, File No. 1-13102)
10.43   Distribution Agreement among the Company, First Industrial, L.P. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC dated February 28, 2011(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed on February 28, 2011, File No. 1-13102)
21.1*   Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23*   Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
31.1*   Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.2*   Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32**   Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.1*   The following financial statements from First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form0 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (audited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations (audited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (audited), (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (audited), (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (audited) and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (audited).

 

* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.
Indicates a compensatory plan or arrangement contemplated by Item 15 a (3) of Form 10-K.

 

50


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibits

  

Description

  3.1    Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
  3.2    Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, dated September 4, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 of the Company’s Form 8-K, dated September 4, 1997, as filed on September 29, 1997, File No. 1-13102)
  3.3    Articles of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, dated June 20, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
  3.4    Articles of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, dated May 31, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
  3.5    Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s 6.236% Series F Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
  3.6    Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s 7.236% Series G Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
  3.7    Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of Form S-3 of the Company and First Industrial, L.P. dated September 24, 1997, Registration No. 333-29879)
  3.8    Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s 7.25% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed January 17, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
  3.9    Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s 7.25% Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.6 of the Form 8-A of the Company, as filed on August 18, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
  3.10    Articles of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, dated May 12, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed June 2, 2011, File No. 1-13102)
  4.1    Deposit Agreement, dated May 27, 2004, by and among the Company, EquiServe Inc. and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. and holders from time to time of Series F Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
  4.2    Deposit Agreement, dated May 27, 2004, by and among the Company, EquiServe Inc. and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. and holders from time to time of Series G Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
  4.3    Remarketing Agreement, dated May 27,2004, relating to 50,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100 of a share of the Series F Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, by and among Lehman Brothers Inc., the Company and First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 of the Form 8-K of the Company, dated May 27, 2004, File No. 1-13102)

 

51


Table of Contents

Exhibits

  

Description

  4.4    Remarketing Agreement, dated May 27,2004, relating to 25,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100 of a share of the Series G Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, by and among Lehman Brothers Inc., the Company and First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.3 of the Form 8-K of the Company, dated May 27, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
  4.5    Deposit Agreement, dated January 13,2006, by and among the Company, Computershare Shareholder Services, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as depositary, and holders from time to time of Series J Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, filed January 17, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
  4.6    Deposit Agreement, dated August 21, 2006, by and among the Company, Computershare Shareholder Services, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as depositary, and holders from time to time of Series K Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.7 of the Form 8-A of the Company, as filed on August 18, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
  4.7    Indenture, dated as of May 13, 1997,between First Industrial, L.P. and First Trust National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1997, as amended by Form 10-Q/A No. 1 of the Company filed May 30, 1997, File No. 1-13102)
  4.8    Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of May 13, 1997, between First Industrial, L.P. and First Trust National Association as Trustee relating to $100 million of 7.15% Notes due 2027 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1997, as amended by Form 10-Q/A No. 1 of the Company filed May 30, 1997, File No. 1-13102)
  4.9    Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated October 28, 1997 between First Industrial, L.P. and First Trust National Association providing for the issuance of Medium-Term Notes due Nine Months or more from Date of Issue (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P., dated November 3, 1997, as filed November 3, 1997, File No. 333-21873)
  4.10    7.50% Medium-Term Note due 2017 in principal amount of $100 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 1-13102)
  4.11    Trust Agreement, dated as of May 16, 1997, between First Industrial, L.P. and First Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Form 10-Q of First Industrial, L.P. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1997, File No. 333-21873)
  4.12    7.60% Notes due 2028 in principal amount of $200 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P. dated July 15, 1998, File No. 333-21873)
  4.13    Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of July 14, 1998, between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, relating to First Industrial, L.P.’s 7.60% Notes due July 15, 2028 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P. dated July 15, 1998, File No. 333-21873)
  4.14    Supplemental Indenture No. 7 dated as of April 15, 2002, between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association, relating to First Industrial, L.P.’s 6.875% Notes due 2012 and 7.75% Notes due 2032 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P. dated April 4, 2002, File No. 333-21873)
  4.15    Form of 6.875% Notes due in 2012 in the principal amount of $200 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P., dated April 4, 2002, File No. 333-21873)

 

52


Table of Contents

Exhibits

  

Description

  4.16    Form of 7.75% Notes due 2032 in the principal amount of $50.0 million issued by First Industrial, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P., dated April 4, 2002, File No. 333-21873)
  4.17    Supplemental Indenture No. 8, dated as of May 17, 2004, relating to 6.42% Senior Notes due June 1, 2014, by and between First Industrial, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of First Industrial, L.P., dated May 27, 2004, File No. 333-21873)
  4.18    Supplemental Indenture No. 10, dated as of January 10, 2006, relating to 5.75% Senior Notes due 2016, by and between the Operating Partnership and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, filed January 11, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
  4.19    Supplemental Indenture No. 11, dated as of May 7, 2007, relating to 5.95% Senior Notes due 2017, by and between the Operating Partnership and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, filed May 5, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.1*    Twelfth Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of First Industrial, L.P. dated February 27, 2012 and effective March 17, 2012 (the “LP Agreement”).
10.2    Sales Agreement by and among the Company, First Industrial, L.P. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. dated September 16, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, dated September 16, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
10.3    Non-Competition Agreement between Jay H. Shidler and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 1-13102)
10.4    Form of Non-Competition Agreement between each of Michael T. Tomasz, Paul T. Lambert, Michael J. Havala, Michael W. Brennan, Michael G. Damone, Duane H. Lund, and Johannson L. Yap and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-77804)
10.5†    1994 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No. 1-13102)
10.6†    First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. Deferred Income Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
10.7    Contribution Agreement, dated March 19, 1996, among FR Acquisitions, Inc. and the parties listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company, dated April 3, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
10.8    Contribution Agreement, dated January 31, 1997, among FR Acquisitions, Inc. and the parties listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.58 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
10.9†    Separation and Release Agreement between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and Michael W. Brennan dated November 26, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed November 28, 2008, File No. 1-13102)
10.10†    1997 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.62 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, File No. 1-13102)
10.11†    2001 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, File No. 1-13102)

 

53


Table of Contents

Exhibits

  

Description

10.12†    Separation and Release Agreement between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and Michael J. Havala dated December 22, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed December 23, 2008, File No. 1-13102)
10.13†    Employment Agreement, dated March 31, 2002, between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and Johannson L. Yap (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 10-Q of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2002, File No. 1-13102)
10.14†    Separation and Release Agreement between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and David P. Draft dated November 25, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed November 28, 2008, File No. 1-13102)
10.15†    Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
10.16†    Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
10.17†    Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
10.18†    Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-13102)
10.19    Unsecured Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of December 14, 2011 among First Industrial, L.P., First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and the other lenders thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed December 15, 2011, File No. 1-13102)
10.20†    Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Director’s Annual Retainer) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed May 19, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
10.21†    Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, File No. 1-13102)
10.22†    Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.23†    Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.24†    Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.25†    Form of Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.26†    Form of Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-13102)

 

54


Table of Contents

Exhibits

  

Description

10.27†    Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.28†    Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, File No. 1-13102)
10.29†    Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, File No. 1-13102)
10.30†    Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, File No. 1-13102)
10.31†    First Amendment, dated as of December 29, 2008, to Employment Agreement, dated March 31, 2002, between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and Johannson L. Yap (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 1-13102)
10.32†    Employment Agreement dated as of January 9, 2009 among First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., First Industrial L.P. and Bruce W. Duncan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed January 12, 2009, File No. 1-13102)
10.33†    Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated as of January 9, 2009 between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and Bruce W. Duncan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed January 12, 2009, File No. 1-13102)
10.34†    2009 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, File No. 1-13102)
10.35†    Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed July 15, 2009, File No. 1-13102)
10.36†    Amendment No. 1, dated as of February 5, 2009, to the Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2009, by and between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and Bruce W. Duncan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, File No. 1-13102)
10.37†    Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed March 4, 2010, File No. 1-13102)
10.38    Distribution Agreement among the First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., First Industrial, L.P. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. dated May 4, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed May 4, 2010, File No. 1-13102)
10.39†    Form of Employee Service Based Bonus Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed July 7, 2010, File No. 1-13102)
10.40†    Form of Employee Service Based Bonus Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed July 13, 2011, File No. 1-13102)
10.41†    2011 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 2, 2011, File No. 1-13102)
10.42†    Amendment No. 1 to 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, dated April 28, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed on April 28, 2011, File No. 1-13102)

 

55


Table of Contents

Exhibits

 

Description

10.43   Distribution Agreement among the Company, First Industrial, L.P. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC dated February 28, 2011(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of the Company filed on February 28, 2011, File No. 1-13102)
21.1*   Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23*   Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
31.1*   Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.2*   Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32**   Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.1   The following financial statements from First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (audited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations (audited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (audited), (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (audited), (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (audited) and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (audited).(1)

 

* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.
Indicates a compensatory plan or arrangement contemplated by Item 15 a (3) of Form 10-K.
(1) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEMPORARY HARDSHIP EXEMPTION PROVIDED BY RULE 201 OF REGULATION S-T, THE DATE BY WHICH THE INTERACTIVE DATA FILE IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED HAS BEEN EXTENDED BY SIX BUSINESS DAYS.

 

56


Table of Contents

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

 

     Page  

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     58   

Consolidated Balance Sheets of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010

     59   

Consolidated Statements of Operations of the Company for the Years Ended December  31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

     60   

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income of the Company for the Years Ended December  31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

     61   

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity of the Company for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

     62   

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of the Company for the Years Ended December  31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

     63   

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

     64   

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

  

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

     S-1   

 

57


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a) (1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 29, 2012

 

58


Table of Contents

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

    December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 
    (In thousands except share and per share data)  
ASSETS    

Assets:

   

Investment in Real Estate:

   

Land

  $ 638,071      $ 554,829   

Buildings and Improvements

    2,326,245        2,061,266   

Construction in Progress

    27,780        2,672   

Less: Accumulated Depreciation

    (658,729     (509,634
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Investment in Real Estate

    2,333,367        2,109,133   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Real Estate and Other Assets Held for Sale, Net of Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization of $39,413 and $165,211

    91,659        392,291   

Cash and Cash Equivalents

    10,153        25,963   

Restricted Cash

    —          117   

Tenant Accounts Receivable, Net

    3,062        3,064   

Investments in Joint Ventures

    1,674        2,451   

Deferred Rent Receivable, Net

    50,033        37,878   

Deferred Financing Costs, Net

    15,244        15,351   

Deferred Leasing Intangibles, Net

    38,037        39,718   

Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net

    123,428        124,088   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Assets

  $ 2,666,657      $ 2,750,054   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    

Liabilities:

   

Indebtedness:

   

Mortgage and Other Loans Payable, Net

  $ 690,256      $ 486,055   

Senior Unsecured Debt, Net

    640,227        879,529   

Unsecured Credit Facility

    149,000        376,184   

Mortgage Loan Payable on Real Estate Held for Sale, Net, Inclusive of $0 and $6 of Accrued Interest

    —          1,014   

Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities, Net

    71,470        67,326   

Deferred Leasing Intangibles, Net

    16,567        18,519   

Rents Received in Advance and Security Deposits

    25,852        27,367   

Leasing Intangibles Held for Sale, Net of Accumulated Amortization of $415 and $2,668

    690        1,916   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

    1,594,062        1,857,910   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies

    —          —     

Equity:

   

First Industrial Realty Trust Inc.’s Stockholders’ Equity:

   

Preferred Stock ($0.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 500, 250, 600, and 200 shares of Series F, G, J, and K Cumulative Preferred Stock, respectively, issued and outstanding, having a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share ($50,000), $100,000 per share ($25,000), $250,000 per share ($150,000), and $250,000 per share ($50,000), respectively)

    —          —     

Common Stock ($0.01 par value, 150,000,000 and 100,000,000 shares authorized; 91,131,516 and 73,165,410 shares issued; and 86,807,402 and 68,841,296 shares outstanding)

    911        732   

Additional Paid-in-Capital

    1,811,349        1,608,014   

Distributions in Excess of Accumulated Earnings

    (633,854     (606,511

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

    (11,712     (15,339

Treasury Shares at Cost (4,324,114 shares)

    (140,018     (140,018
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Stockholders’ Equity

    1,026,676        846,878   

Noncontrolling Interest

    45,919        45,266   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Equity

    1,072,595        892,144   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Equity

  $ 2,666,657      $ 2,750,054   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

59


Table of Contents

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

    Year Ended
December 31,
2011
    Year Ended
December 31,
2010
    Year Ended
December 31,
2009
 
    (In thousands except per share data)  

Revenues:

     

Rental Income

  $ 243,478      $ 242,213      $ 246,027   

Tenant Recoveries and Other Income

    74,357        78,696        83,588   

Construction Revenues

    —          869        54,957   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Revenues

    317,835        321,778        384,572   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Expenses:

     

Property Expenses

    108,590        108,651        111,280   

General and Administrative

    20,638        26,589        37,835   

Restructuring Costs

    1,553        1,858        7,806   

Impairment of Real Estate

    (8,807     112,904        5,617   

Depreciation and Other Amortization

    121,604        125,298        131,871   

Construction Expenses

    —          507        52,720   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Expenses

    243,578        375,807        347,129   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Income (Expense):

     

Interest Income

    3,922        4,364        3,084   

Interest Expense

    (100,127     (105,898     (114,768

Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs

    (3,963     (3,473     (3,030

Mark-to-Market (Loss) Gain on Interest Rate Protection Agreements

    (1,718     (1,107     3,667   

(Loss) Gain From Retirement of Debt

    (5,459     (4,304     34,562   

Foreign Currency Exchange Loss

    (332     (190     —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Other Income (Expense)

    (107,677     (110,608     (76,485

Loss from Continuing Operations Before Equity in Income (Loss) of Joint Ventures, Gain on Sale of Joint Venture Interests, Gain on Change in Control of Interests and Income Tax (Provision) Benefit

    (33,420     (164,637     (39,042

Equity in Income (Loss) of Joint Ventures

    980        675        (6,470

Gain on Sale of Joint Venture Interests

    —          11,226        —     

Gain on Change in Control of Interests

    689        —          —     

Income Tax (Provision) Benefit

    (450     (2,963     25,185   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from Continuing Operations

    (32,201     (155,699     (20,327
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Discontinued Operations:

     

Income (Loss) Attributable to Discontinued Operations

    2,920        (77,529     1,922   

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

    20,419        11,092        24,206   

Provision for Income Taxes Allocable to Discontinued Operations

    (1,246     —          (1,846
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Discontinued Operations

    22,093        (66,437     24,282   

(Loss) Income Before Gain on Sale of Real Estate

    (10,108     (222,136     3,955   

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

    1,370        859        374   

Provision for Income Taxes Allocable to Gain on Sale of Real Estate

    (452     (342     (143
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income

    (9,190     (221,619     4,186   

Less: Net Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interest

    1,745        18,798        1,547   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income Attributable to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.

    (7,445     (202,821     5,733   

Less: Preferred Dividends

    (19,565     (19,677     (19,516
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Loss Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders and Participating Securities

  $ (27,010   $ (222,498   $ (13,783
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share:

     

Loss from Continuing Operations Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders

  $ (0.59   $ (2.56   $ (0.73
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations Attributable to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders

  $ 0.26      $ (0.97   $ 0.45   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Loss Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders and Participating Securities

  $ (0.34   $ (3.53   $ (0.28
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Distributions Per Share

  $ 0.00      $ 0.00      $ 0.00   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

    80,616        62,953        48,695   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

60


Table of Contents

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
2011
    Year Ended
December 31,
2010
    Year Ended
December 31,
2009
 
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Net (Loss) Income

   $ (9,190   $ (221,619   $ 4,186   

Mark-to-Market on Interest Rate Protection Agreements, Net of Income Tax Provision

     —          990        (383

Amortization of Interest Rate Protection Agreements

     2,166        2,108        796   

Write-off of Unamortized Settlement Amounts of Interest Rate Protection Agreements

     3,250        (182     523   

Reclassification of Foreign Exchange Loss on Substantial Liquidation of Foreign Entities, Net of Income Tax Benefit

     179        —          —     

Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment, Net of Income Tax (Provision) Benefit

     (1,480     563        1,503   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive (Loss) Income

     (5,075     (218,140     6,625   

Comprehensive Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest

     1,494        18,527        1,299   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive (Loss) Income Attributable to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.

   $ (3,581   $ (199,613   $ 7,924   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

61


Table of Contents

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

    Preferred
Stock
    Common
Stock
    Additional
Paid-in
Capital
    Treasury
Shares
At Cost
    Distributions
in Excess of
Earnings
    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
    Noncontrolling
Interest
    Total  

Balance as of December 31, 2008

  $ —        $ 490      $ 1,398,024      $ (140,018   $ (370,229   $ (19,668   $ 122,117      $ 990,716   

Issuance of Common Stock, Net of Issuance Costs

    —          169        83,626        —          —          —          —          83,795   

Stock Based Compensation Activity

    —          (1     12,662        —          (1     —          —          12,660   

Conversion of Units to Common Stock

    —          4        7,813        —          —          —          (7,817     —     

Reallocation—Additional Paid in Capital

    —          —          49,126        —          —          —          (49,126     —     

Repurchase of Equity Component of Exchangeable Note

    —          —          (33     —          —          —          —          (33

Preferred Dividends

    —          —          —          —          (19,516     —          —          (19,516

Net Income (Loss)

    —          —          —          —          5,733        —          (1,547     4,186   

Reallocation—Other Comprehensive Income

    —          —          —          —          —          (931     931        —     

Other Comprehensive Income

    —          —          —          —          —          2,191        248        2,439   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2009

  $ —        $ 662      $ 1,551,218      $ (140,018   $ (384,013   $ (18,408   $ 64,806      $ 1,074,247   

Issuance of Common Stock, Net of Issuance Costs

    —          64        49,909        —          —          —          —          49,973   

Stock Based Compensation Activity

    —          5        5,736        —          —          —          —          5,741   

Conversion of Units to Common Stock

    —          1        315        —          —          —          (316     —     

Reallocation—Additional Paid in Capital

    —          —          836        —          —          —          (836     —     

Preferred Dividends

    —          —          —          —          (19,677     —          —          (19,677

Net Loss

    —          —          —          —          (202,821     —          (18,798     (221,619

Reallocation—Other Comprehensive Income

    —          —          —          —          —          (139     139        —     

Other Comprehensive Income

    —          —          —          —          —          3,208        271        3,479   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

  $ —        $ 732      $ 1,608,014      $ (140,018   $ (606,511   $ (15,339   $ 45,266      $ 892,144   

Issuance of Common Stock, Net of Issuance Costs

    —          174        202,158        —          —          —          —          202,332   

Stock Based Compensation Activity

    —          4        3,088        —          (333     —          —          2,759   

Conversion of Units to Common Stock

    —          1        1,108        —          —          —          (1,109     —     

Reallocation—Additional Paid in Capital

    —          —          (3,019     —          —          —          3,019        —     

Preferred Dividends

    —          —          —          —          (19,565     —          —          (19,565

Net Loss

    —          —          —          —          (7,445     —          (1,745     (9,190

Reallocation—Other Comprehensive Income

    —          —          —          —          —          (237     237        —     

Other Comprehensive Income

    —          —          —          —          —          3,864        251        4,115   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

  $ —        $ 911      $ 1,811,349      $ (140,018   $ (633,854   $ (11,712   $ 45,919      $ 1,072,595   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

62


Table of Contents

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
2011
    Year Ended
December 31,
2010
    Year Ended
December 31,
2009
 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

      

Net (Loss) Income

   $ (9,190   $ (221,619   $ 4,186   

Adjustments to Reconcile Net (Loss) Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:

      

Depreciation

     95,931        104,175        112,241   

Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs

     3,963        3,473        3,030   

Other Amortization

     36,390        41,024        52,646   

Impairment of Real Estate, Net

     (2,661     194,552        6,934   

Provision for Bad Debt

     1,110        1,880        3,259   

Equity in (Income) Loss of Joint Ventures

     (980     (675     6,470   

Distributions from Joint Ventures

     1,033        3,032        2,319   

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

     (21,789     (11,951     (24,580

Gain on Sale of Joint Venture Interests

     —          (11,226     —     

Gain on Change in Control of Interests

     (689     —          —     

Loss (Gain) on Retirement of Debt

     5,459        4,304        (34,562

Prepayment Premiums Associated with Retirement of Debt

     (1,268     —          —     

Mark-to-Market Loss (Gain) on Interest Rate Protection Agreements

     1,718        1,107        (3,667

Decrease in Developments for Sale Costs

     —          —          812   

(Increase) Decrease in Tenant Accounts Receivable, Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net

     (2,933     (1,580     51,641   

Increase in Deferred Rent Receivable

     (7,733     (7,041     (8,350

Decrease in Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses, Other Liabilities, Rents Received in Advance and Security Deposits

     (5,684     (9,411     (27,631

Decrease (Increase) in Restricted Cash

     117        (15     7   

Payments of Premiums and Discounts Associated with Senior Unsecured Notes

     (5,260     (6,840     (2,576
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

     87,534        83,189        142,179   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

      

Purchases of and Additions to Investment in Real Estate and Lease Costs

     (90,524     (89,736     (75,947

Net Proceeds from Sales of Investments in Real Estate

     75,953        68,046        74,982   

Contributions to and Investments in Joint Ventures

     (155     (777     (3,742

Distributions and Sales Proceeds from Joint Venture Interests

     650        11,519        6,333   

Repayment of Notes Receivable

     10,394        1,460        3,151   

Increase in Lender Escrows

     (97     (435     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities

     (3,779     (9,923     4,777   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

      

Debt and Equity Issuance Costs

     (7,162     (4,544     (8,322

Proceeds from the Issuance of Common Stock, Net of Underwriter’s Discount

     202,845        50,087        84,465   

Repurchase and Retirement of Restricted Stock

     (1,001     (298     (739

Payments on Interest Rate Swap Agreement

     (489     (450     (320

Settlement of Interest Rate Protection Agreements

     —          —          (7,491

Repayments of Senior Unsecured Notes

     (234,307     (259,018     (336,196

Dividends/Distributions

     —          —          (12,614

Preferred Stock Dividends

     (15,254     (19,677     (20,296

Repayments on Mortgage and Other Loans Payable

     (71,983     (20,872     (13,513

Proceeds from Origination of Mortgage Loans Payable

     255,900        105,580        339,783   

Proceeds from Unsecured Credit Facility

     390,500        69,097        180,000   

Repayments on Unsecured Credit Facility

     (618,553     (149,280     (172,000

Costs Associated with the Retirement of Debt

     —          (1,008     —     

Repurchase of Equity Component Exchangeable Notes

     —          —          (33
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities

     (99,504     (230,383     32,724   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents

     (61     137        81   

Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

     (15,749     (157,117     179,680   

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year

     25,963        182,943        3,182   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year

   $ 10,153      $ 25,963      $ 182,943   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

63


Table of Contents

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)

1. Organization and Formation of Company

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) was organized in the state of Maryland on August 10, 1993. The Company is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc., First Industrial, L.P. and their other controlled subsidiaries. We refer to our operating partnership, First Industrial, L.P., as the “Operating Partnership.”

We began operations on July 1, 1994. Our operations are conducted primarily through the Operating Partnership, of which we are the sole general partner, and through our taxable REIT subsidiaries. We also conduct operations through other partnerships and limited liability companies, the operating data of which, together with that of the Operating Partnership and the taxable REIT subsidiaries, is consolidated with that of the Company as presented herein.

We also own noncontrolling equity interests in, and provide various services to, two joint ventures (the “2003 Net Lease Joint Venture” and the “2007 Europe Joint Venture”). During 2010, we provided various services to, and ultimately disposed of our equity interests in, five joint ventures (the “2005 Development/Repositioning Joint Venture,” the “2005 Core Joint Venture,” the “2006 Net Lease Co-Investment Program,” the “2006 Land/Development Joint Venture,” and the “2007 Canada Joint Venture;” together with the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture and the 2007 Europe Joint Venture, the “Joint Ventures”). The Joint Ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the operating data of our Joint Ventures is not consolidated with that of the Company as presented herein. The 2007 Europe Joint Venture does not own any properties. See Note 5 for more information on the Joint Ventures.

As of December 31, 2011, we owned 740 industrial properties located in 26 states in the United States and one province in Canada, containing an aggregate of approximately 66.3 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”).

Any references to the number of buildings and square footage in the financial statement footnotes are unaudited.

2. Basis of Presentation

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, with an approximate 94.3% and 92.8% common ownership interest at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Noncontrolling interest at December 31, 2011 and 2010 of 5.7% and 7.2%, respectively, represents the aggregate partnership interest in the Operating Partnership held by the limited partners thereof.

Our consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2011 and 2010 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 include the accounts and operating results of the Company and our subsidiaries. Such financial statements present our noncontrolling equity interests in our Joint Ventures under the equity method of accounting. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

In order to conform with generally accepted accounting principles, we are required in preparation of our financial statements to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the reported amounts of

 

64


Table of Contents

revenues and expenses for each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain reclassifications within the footnotes have been made to prior period amounts in order to conform with current period presentation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short term maturity of these investments.

Restricted Cash

At December 31, 2010, restricted cash primarily includes cash held in escrow in connection with mortgage debt requirements. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short term maturity of these investments.

Investment in Real Estate and Depreciation

Investment in Real Estate is carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. We review our properties on a continuous basis for impairment and provide a provision if impairments exist. To determine if an impairment may exist, we review our properties and identify those that have had either an event of change or event of circumstances warranting further assessment of recoverability (such as a decrease in occupancy or decline in general market conditions). If further assessment of recoverability is needed, we estimate the future net cash flows expected to result from the use of the property and its eventual disposition on an individual property basis. If the sum of the expected future net cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the property on an individual property basis, we will recognize an impairment loss based upon the estimated fair value of such property. For properties we consider held for sale, we cease depreciating the properties and value the properties at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value, less costs to dispose. If circumstances arise that were previously considered unlikely, and, as a result, we decide not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, we will reclassify such property as held and used. Such property is measured at the lower of its carrying amount (adjusted for any depreciation and amortization expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used) or fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell. To calculate the fair value of properties held for sale, we deduct from the estimated sales price of the property the estimated costs to close the sale. We classify properties as held for sale when all criteria within the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (the “FASB”) guidance on the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets are met.

Interest costs, real estate taxes, compensation costs of development personnel and other directly related costs incurred during construction periods are capitalized and depreciated commencing with the date the property is substantially completed. Upon substantial completion, we reclassify construction in progress to building, tenant improvements and leasing commissions. Such costs begin to be capitalized to the development projects from the point we are undergoing necessary activities to get the development ready for its intended use and ceases when the development projects are substantially completed and held available for occupancy. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method based on the following useful lives:

 

     Years  

Buildings and Improvements

     8 to 50   

Land Improvements

     3 to 20   

Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment

     5 to 10   

Construction expenditures for tenant improvements, leasehold improvements and leasing commissions (inclusive of compensation costs of personnel attributable to leasing) are capitalized and amortized over the terms of each specific lease. Capitalized compensation costs of personnel attributable to leasing relate to time directly attributable to originating leases with independent third parties that result directly from and are essential to originating those leases and would not have been incurred had these leasing transactions not occurred. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense when incurred. Expenditures for improvements are capitalized.

 

65


Table of Contents

Upon acquisition of a property, we allocate the purchase price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which generally consists of land, buildings, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and intangible assets including in-place leases, above market and below market leases and tenant relationships. We allocate the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. Acquired above and below market leases are valued based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below market fixed rate renewal options for below market leases. The above market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the below market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases.

The purchase price is further allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value of in-place lease intangibles and tenant relationships, which are included as components of Deferred Leasing Intangibles, Net are amortized over the remaining lease term (and expected renewal periods of the respective lease for tenant relationships) as adjustments to depreciation and other amortization expense. If a tenant terminates its lease early, the unamortized portion of the tenant improvements, leasing commissions, above and below market leases, the in-place lease value and tenant relationships is immediately written off.

Deferred Leasing Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization (exclusive of Deferred Leasing Intangibles held for sale) included in our total assets and total liabilities consist of the following:

 

     December 31,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 

In-Place Leases

   $ 19,587       $ 21,951   

Above Market Leases

   $ 5,888       $ 3,948   

Tenant Relationships

   $ 12,562       $ 13,819   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total included in Total Assets

   $ 38,037       $ 39,718   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Below Market Leases

   $ 16,567       $ 18,519   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total included in Total Liabilities

   $ 16,567       $ 18,519   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Amortization expense related to in-place leases and tenant relationships of deferred leasing intangibles, exclusive of in-place leases and tenant relationships held for sale, was $11,076, $14,185 and $16,162 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. Rental revenues increased by $1,431, $2,857 and $4,273 related to net amortization of above/(below) market leases, exclusive of above/(below) market leases held for sale, for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. We will recognize net amortization expense related to deferred leasing intangibles over the next five years, for properties owned as of December 31, 2011 and not classified as held for sale, as follows:

 

     Estimated
Amortization
of In-Place
Leases and Tenant
Relationships
     Estimated Net
Increase to
Rental Revenues
Related to
Above and Below
Market Leases
 

2012

   $ 6,519       $ 763   

2013

   $ 5,457       $ 531   

2014

   $ 4,417       $ 380   

2015

   $ 3,750       $ 371   

2016

   $ 2,394       $ 884   

 

66


Table of Contents

Construction Revenues and Expenses

Construction revenues and expenses represent revenues earned and expenses incurred in connection with a taxable REIT subsidiary acting as a general contractor or development manager to construct industrial properties and also include revenues and expenses related to the development of properties for third parties. We use the percentage-of-completion contract method to recognize revenue. Using this method, revenues are recorded based on estimates of the percentage of completion of individual contracts. The percentage of completion estimates are based on a comparison of the contract expenditures incurred to the estimated final costs. Changes in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined.

Foreign Currency Transactions and Translation

At December 31, 2011, we owned a land parcel located in Toronto, Canada for which the functional currency was determined to be the Canadian dollar. The assets and liabilities related to this land parcel are translated to U.S. dollars from the Canadian dollar based on the current exchange rate prevailing at each balance sheet date. The income statement accounts related to this land parcel are translated using the average exchange rate for the period. The resulting translation adjustments are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs include fees and costs incurred to obtain long-term financing. These fees and costs are being amortized over the terms of the respective loans. Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs was $13,086 and $16,565 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Unamortized deferred financing costs are written-off when debt is retired before the maturity date.

Investments in Joint Ventures

Investments in Joint Ventures represent our noncontrolling equity interests in our Joint Ventures. We account for our Investments in Joint Ventures under the equity method of accounting, as we do not have a majority voting interest, operational control or financial control. Control is determined using accounting standards related to the consolidation of joint ventures and variable interest entities. In order to assess whether consolidation of a variable-interest entity is required, an enterprise is required to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) based on whether the entity (1) has the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the activities of the VIE, and (2) has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Additionally, they require an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary and provide a framework for the events that trigger a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE.

Under the equity method of accounting, our share of earnings or losses of our Joint Ventures is reflected in income as earned and contributions or distributions increase or decrease our Investments in Joint Ventures as paid or received, respectively. Differences between our carrying value of our Investments in Joint Ventures and our underlying equity of such Joint Ventures are amortized over the respective lives of the underlying assets.

On a continuous basis, we assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our Investments in Joint Ventures may be impaired. An investment is impaired if our estimate of the fair value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, and such decline in fair value is deemed to be other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment. Our estimates of fair value for each investment are based on a number of subjective assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, market rental rates and operating costs, the discount rate used to value the cash flows of the

 

67


Table of Contents

properties, the cap rate used to estimate the terminal value of the underlying properties and the discount rate used to value the Joint Ventures’ debt. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter our assumptions, our fair values estimated in the impairment analyses may not be realized.

Stock Based Compensation

We account for stock based compensation using the modified prospective application method, which requires measurement of compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognition of compensation over the service period for awards expected to vest.

Net income, net of preferred dividends, is allocated to common stockholders and participating securities based upon their proportionate share of weighted average shares plus weighted average participating securities. Participating securities are unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. Certain restricted stock awards and restricted unit awards granted to employees and directors are considered participating securities as they receive non-forfeitable dividend or dividend equivalents at the same rate as common stock. See Note 9 for further disclosure about participating securities.

Revenue Recognition

Rental income is recognized on a straight-line method under which contractual rent increases are recognized evenly over the lease term. Tenant recovery income includes payments from tenants for real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses and is recognized as revenue in the same period the related expenses are incurred by us.

Revenue is generally recognized on payments received from tenants for early lease terminations upon the effective termination of a tenant’s lease and when we have no further obligations under the lease.

Interest income on mortgage loans receivable is recognized based on the accrual method unless a significant uncertainty of collection exists. If a significant uncertainty exists, interest income is recognized as collected.

We provide an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of tenant accounts receivable including deferred rent receivable, which is estimated to be uncollectible. Accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,675 and $3,001 as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Deferred rent receivable in the consolidated balance sheets are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,302 and $1,855 as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For accounts receivable we deem uncollectible, we use the direct write-off method.

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

Gain on sale of real estate is recognized using the full accrual method, when appropriate. Gains relating to transactions which do not meet the full accrual method of accounting are deferred and recognized when the full accrual method of accounting criteria are met or by using the installment or deposit methods of profit recognition, as appropriate in the circumstances. As the assets are sold, their costs and related accumulated depreciation are written off with resulting gains or losses reflected in net income or loss. Estimated future costs to be incurred by us after completion of each sale are included in the determination of the gain on sales.

Notes Receivable

Notes receivable are primarily comprised of mortgage note receivables that we have made in connection with sales of real estate assets. The note receivables are recorded at fair value at the time of issuance. Interest income is accrued as earned. Notes receivable are considered past due based on the contractual terms of the note agreement. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the collectability of each mortgage note receivable based on various factors which may include payment history, expected fair value of the collateral securing the loan, internal and

 

68


Table of Contents

external credit information and/or economic trends. A loan is considered impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due under the existing contractual terms. When a loan is considered impaired, the amount of the loss accrual is calculated by comparing the carrying amount of the note receivable to the present value of expected future cash flows. Since the majority of our notes receivable are collateralized by a first mortgage, the loans have risk characteristics similar to the risks in owning commercial real estate.

Income Taxes

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our adjusted taxable income to our stockholders. Management intends to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain our REIT status. As a REIT, we are entitled to a tax deduction for some or all of the dividends we pay to shareholders. Accordingly, we generally will not be subject to federal income taxes as long as we currently distribute to shareholders an amount equal to or in excess of our taxable income. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years.

REIT qualification reduces, but does not eliminate, the amount of state and local taxes we pay. In addition, our financial statements include the operations of taxable corporate subsidiaries that are not entitled to a dividends paid deduction and are subject to corporate federal, state and local income taxes. As a REIT, we may also be subject to certain federal excise and franchise taxes if we engage in certain types of transactions. A benefit/provision has been made for federal, state and local income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In accordance with FASB’s guidance, the total benefit/provision has been separately allocated to income (loss) from continuing operations, income (loss) from discontinued operations and gain (loss) on sale of real estate. The provision for excise and franchise taxes has been reflected in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations and has not been separately stated due to its insignificance.

We evaluate tax positions taken in the financial statements on a quarterly basis under the interpretation for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. As a result of this evaluation, we may recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is “more-likely-than-not” that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities. As of December 31, 2011, we do not have any unrecognized tax benefits.

We file income tax returns in the U.S., and various states and foreign jurisdictions. In general, the statutes of limitations for income tax returns remain open for the years 2008 through 2011. One of our taxable REIT subsidiaries which liquidated in September 2009 is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for 2008 and for the tax year ended September 1, 2009 during which we received refunds from the IRS of $3,767 and $40,418, respectively.

During 2005, we recorded a $745 franchise tax reserve related to a potential state franchise tax assessment for the 1996-2001 tax years. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we received a refund from the state, representing amounts paid during 2006 related to the 1996-2001 tax years. Based on the refund received and discussions with the taxing authorities, as of December 31, 2011, management believes that it is unlikely that any franchise tax amounts will be assessed by the state for such tax years. As such, during the year ended December 31, 2011, we have reversed $745 of franchise taxes. Franchise taxes are recorded within general and administrative expense.

Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and any dilutive non-participating securities for the period. See Note 9 for further disclosure about EPS.

 

69


Table of Contents

Derivative Financial Instruments

Historically, we have used interest rate protection agreements (“Agreements”) to fix the interest rate on anticipated offerings of senior unsecured notes or convert floating rate debt to fixed rate debt. Receipts or payments that result from the settlement of Agreements used to fix the interest rate on anticipated offerings of senior unsecured notes are amortized over the life of the derivative or the life of the debt and included in interest expense. Receipts or payments resulting from Agreements used to convert floating rate debt to fixed rate debt are recognized as a component of interest expense. Agreements which qualify for hedge accounting are marked-to-market and any gain or loss that is effective is recognized in other comprehensive income (shareholders’ equity). Agreements which do not qualify for hedge accounting are marked-to-market and any gain or loss is recognized in net income (loss) immediately. Amounts accumulated in other comprehensive income during the hedge period are reclassified to earnings in the same period during which the forecasted transaction or hedged item affects net income (loss). The credit risks associated with Agreements are controlled through the evaluation and monitoring of the creditworthiness of the counterparty. In the event that the counterparty fails to meet the terms of Agreements, our exposure is limited to the current value of the interest rate differential, not the notional amount, and our carrying value of Agreements on the balance sheet. See Note 14 for more information on Agreements.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial instruments other than our derivatives include tenant accounts receivable, net, notes receivable, accounts payable, other accrued expenses, mortgage and other loans payable, unsecured credit facility and senior unsecured notes. The fair values of tenant accounts receivable, net, accounts payable and other accrued expenses approximate their carrying or contract values. See Note 6 for the fair values of the mortgage and other loans payable, unsecured credit facility and senior unsecured notes and see Note 4 for the fair value of our notes receivable.

Discontinued Operations

The FASB’s guidance on financial reporting for the disposal of long lived assets requires that the results of operations and gains or losses on the sale of property or property held for sale be presented in discontinued operations if both of the following criteria are met: (a) the operations and cash flows of the property have been (or will be) eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company as a result of the disposal transaction and (b) we will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the property after the disposal transaction. The guidance also requires prior period results of operations for these properties to be reclassified and presented in discontinued operations in prior consolidated statements of operations.

Segment Reporting

Management views the Company as a single segment based on its method of internal reporting.

4. Investment in Real Estate

Acquisitions

In 2009, we acquired one land parcel. The purchase price of the land parcel was approximately $208, excluding costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition of the land parcel. We also substantially completed the development of two industrial properties comprising approximately 1.1 million square feet of GLA at a cost of approximately $41,258. We reclassed the costs of the substantially completed developments from construction in progress to building, tenant improvements and leasing commissions.

In 2010, we acquired three industrial properties comprising, in the aggregate, approximately 0.5 million square feet of GLA, including one industrial property purchased from the 2005 Development/Repositioning Joint Venture (see Note 5). The purchase price of these acquisitions totaled approximately $22,408 excluding costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition of the industrial properties.

 

70


Table of Contents

In 2011, we acquired one industrial property comprising approximately 0.7 million square feet of GLA in connection with the purchase of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture (see Note 5). The gross agreed-upon fair value for the real estate was $30,625, excluding costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition of the industrial property. The acquisition was funded through the assumption of a mortgage loan, whose carrying value approximated fair market value, in the amount of $24,417 and a cash payment of $5,277 (85% of the net fair value of the acquisition). We accounted for this transaction as a step acquisition utilizing the purchase method of accounting. Due to the change in control that occurred, we recorded a gain of approximately $689 related to the difference between our carrying value and fair value of our equity interest on the acquisition date.

Intangible Assets Subject To Amortization in the Period of Acquisition

The fair value at the date of acquisition of in-place leases, above market leases and tenant relationships recorded due to real estate properties acquired for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, which is recorded as deferred leasing intangibles, is as follows:

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
2011
     Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 

In-Place Leases

   $ 2,511       $ 1,782   

Above Market Leases

   $ 2,883       $ 239   

Tenant Relationships

   $ 1,553       $ 1,881   

The weighted average life in months of in-place leases, above market leases and tenant relationships recorded at the time of acquisition at the time of acquisition as a result of the real estate properties acquired for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
2011
     Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 

In-Place Leases

     56         100   

Above Market Leases

     56         88   

Tenant Relationships

     116         165   

Sales and Discontinued Operations

In 2009, we sold 15 industrial properties comprising approximately 1.9 million square feet of GLA and several land parcels. Gross proceeds from the sales of the 15 industrial properties and several land parcels were approximately $100,194. The gain on sale of real estate was approximately $24,580, of which $24,206 is shown in discontinued operations. The 15 sold industrial properties meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations. Therefore the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the 15 sold industrial properties are included in discontinued operations. The results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the several land parcels that do not meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations are included in continuing operations.

In 2010, we sold 13 industrial properties comprising approximately 1.1 million square feet of GLA and several land parcels. Gross proceeds from the sales of the 13 industrial properties and several land parcels were approximately $71,019. The gain on sale of real estate was approximately $11,951, of which $11,092 is shown in discontinued operations. The 13 sold industrial properties and one land parcel that received ground rental revenues meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations. Therefore the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the 13 sold industrial properties and one land parcel that received ground rental revenues are included in discontinued operations. The results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the several land parcels that do not meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations are included in continuing operations.

 

71


Table of Contents

In 2011, we sold 36 industrial properties comprising approximately 2.9 million square feet of GLA and one land parcel. Gross proceeds from the sales of the 36 industrial properties and one land parcel were approximately $86,643. Included in the 36 industrial properties sold is one industrial property totaling approximately 0.4 million square feet of GLA that we transferred title to a lender in satisfaction of a non-recourse mortgage loan (See Note 6). The gain on sale of real estate was approximately $21,789, of which $20,419 is shown in discontinued operations. The 36 sold industrial properties meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations. Therefore the results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the 36 sold industrial properties are included in discontinued operations. The results of operations and gain on sale of real estate for the one land parcel that does not meet the criteria to be included in discontinued operations are included in continuing operations.

At December 31, 2011, we had 46 industrial properties comprising approximately 4.8 million square feet of GLA held for sale. The results of operations of the 46 industrial properties held for sale at December 31, 2011 are included in discontinued operations. There can be no assurance that such industrial properties held for sale will be sold.

The following table discloses certain information for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 regarding the industrial properties included in our discontinued operations.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2011     2010     2009  

Total Revenues

   $ 19,932      $ 27,481      $ 36,850   

Property Expenses

     (8,658     (11,821     (14,966

Impairment of Real Estate

     (6,146     (81,648     (1,317

Depreciation and Amortization

     (2,145     (11,273     (17,992

Interest Expense

     (63     (268     (653

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

     20,419        11,092        24,206   

Provision for Income Taxes

     (1,246     —          (1,846
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

   $ 22,093      $ (66,437   $ 24,282   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had notes receivable outstanding of approximately $55,502 and $58,803, net of a discount of $319 and $383, respectively, which are included as a component of Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the fair value of the notes receivable was $58,734 and $60,944, respectively. The fair value of our notes receivable was determined by discounting the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans with similar remaining maturities would be made to other borrowers. The current market rates we utilized were internally estimated; therefore, we have concluded that our determination of fair value of our notes receivable was primarily based upon Level 3 inputs, as defined below.

Impairment Charges

On October 22, 2010, we amended our existing revolving credit facility (See Note 6). In conjunction with the amendment, management identified a pool of real estate assets (the “Non-Strategic Assets”) that it intended to sell. The Non-Strategic Assets originally consisted of 195 industrial properties comprising approximately 16.4 million square feet of GLA and land parcels comprising approximately 724 gross acres. At the time of the amendment, management reassessed the holding period for the Non-Strategic Assets and determined that certain of the industrial properties were impaired, and as such, the Company recorded an aggregate impairment charge of $185,397 for the year ended December 31, 2010.

At December 31, 2011, the Non-Strategic Assets consisted of 133 industrial properties comprising approximately 11.3 million square feet of GLA and land parcels comprising approximately 359 gross acres. Forty-six industrial properties comprising approximately 4.8 million square feet of GLA and land parcels comprising approximately 61 acres of the Non-Strategic Assets were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2011. The net impairment charges for assets that qualify to be classified as held for sale at

 

72


Table of Contents

December 31, 2011 were calculated as the difference of the carrying value of the properties and land parcels over the fair value less costs to sell. The net impairment charges recorded during year ended December 31, 2011 are due to updated fair market values for certain of the Non-Strategic Assets whose estimated fair market values have changed since December 31, 2010. On the date an asset no longer qualifies to be classified as held for sale, the carrying value must be reestablished at the lower of the estimated fair market value of the asset or the carrying value of the asset prior to held for sale classification, adjusted for any depreciation and amortization that would have been recorded if the asset had not been classified as held for sale. Impairment has been reversed and/or catch-up depreciation and amortization has been recorded during year ended December 31, 2011, if applicable, for these assets that are no longer classified as held for sale.

In addition to the impairment recorded related to the Non-Strategic Assets, during the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded an impairment charge in the amount of $9,155 related to a property comprised of 0.3 million square feet of GLA located in Grand Rapids, Michigan (“Grand Rapids Property”) in connection with the negotiation of a new lease. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded an impairment charge of $6,934 related to a property comprised of 0.2 million square feet of GLA located in the Inland Empire (“Inland Empire Property”) due to adverse conditions in the credit and real estate markets. The non-cash impairment charges related to the Grand Rapids Property and the Inland Empire Property were based upon the difference between the fair value of the properties and their carrying value.

During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recorded the following net non-cash impairment charges:

 

     Year Ended
December  31,
2011
    Year Ended
December  31,
2010
    Year Ended
December  31,
2009
 

Operating Properties—Held for Sale and Sold Assets

   $ (6,146   $ (81,648   $ (1,317
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impairment—Discontinued Operations

   $ (6,146   $ (81,648   $ (1,317
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Land Parcels—Held for Sale and Sold Assets

   $ 5,879      $ (8,275   $ —     

Operating Properties—Held for Use

     1,687        (90,204     (5,617

Land Parcels—Held for Use

     1,241        (14,425     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impairment—Continuing Operations

   $ 8,807      $ (112,904   $ (5,617
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Net Impairment

   $ 2,661      $ (194,552   $ (6,934
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The guidance for the fair value measurement provisions for the impairment of long lived assets recorded at fair value establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The fair market values were determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analyses on expected cash flows, internal valuations of real estate and third party offers.

For operational real estate assets, the most significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analyses included the discount rate, projected occupancy levels, rental rates and capital expenditures, and the future exit capitalization rate. For the valuation of land parcels, we reviewed recent comparable sales transactions, to the extent available, or if not available, we considered older comparable transactions, adjusted upward or downward to reflect management’s assumptions about current market conditions. In all cases, members of our management team that were responsible for the individual markets where the land parcels were located determined the internal valuations. Valuations based on third party offers include bona fide contract prices and letter of intent amounts, that we believe are indicative of fair value.

 

73


Table of Contents

The following tables present information about our assets that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The tables indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques we utilized to determine fair value.

 

            Fair Value Measurements on a Non-Recurring Basis Using:         

Description

   Year Ended
December 31,
2011
     Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
     Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
     Total
Impairment
 

Long-lived Assets Held for Sale*

   $ 52,057         —           —         $ 52,057       $ (6,121

Long-lived Assets Held and Used*

   $ 22,090         —           —         $ 22,090         (896
              

 

 

 
               $ (7,017

 

            Fair Value Measurements on a Non-Recurring Basis Using:         

Description

   Year Ended
December  31,
2010
     Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
     Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
     Total
Impairment
 

Long-lived Assets Held for Sale

   $ 288,369         —           —         $ 288,369       $ (193,226

Long-lived Assets Held and Used

   $ 3,905         —           —         $ 3,905         (1,326
              

 

 

 
               $ (194,552

  

 

* Excludes industrial properties and land parcels for which an impairment reversal of $9,678 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2011, since the related assets are recorded at carrying value, which is lower than estimated fair value at December 31, 2011.

5. Investments in Joint Ventures

On May 16, 2003, we entered into the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture with an institutional investor to invest in industrial properties. We own a 15% equity interest in and provide property management services to the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture. As of December 31, 2011, the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture owned seven industrial properties comprising approximately 3.4 million square feet of GLA (see Note 16 for subsequent events). The 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture is considered a variable interest entity, however, we continue to conclude that we are not the primary beneficiary of this venture. As of December 31, 2011, our investment in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture is $1,674. Our maximum exposure to loss is currently equal to our investment balance. On May 26, 2011, we acquired the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture (see Note 4).

During December 2007, we entered into the 2007 Europe Joint Venture with an institutional investor to invest in, own, develop, redevelop and operate industrial properties. We continue to hold our 10% equity interest in the 2007 Europe Joint Venture. As of December 31, 2011, the 2007 Europe Joint Venture did not own any properties.

On August 5, 2010, we sold our interests in the 2005 Development/Repositioning Joint Venture, the 2005 Core Joint Venture, the 2006 Land/Development Joint Venture and the 2007 Canada Joint Venture to our joint venture partner generating sale proceeds of approximately $5.0 million. In connection with the sale, we wrote off our carrying value for the 2005 Development/Repositioning Joint Venture, the 2005 Core Joint Venture, the 2006 Land/Development Joint Venture and the 2007 Canada Joint Venture as well as $1,625 of unrealized loss recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (see Note 14). We recorded an $11,226 gain related to the sale, which is included in Gain on Sale of Joint Venture Interests for the year ended December 31, 2010. As a result of this sale, we no longer serve as asset manager for these ventures. Pursuant to the sale agreement, we were entitled to proceeds related to sales of certain assets (the “Sale Assets”), if the sale of such assets was consummated by a

 

74


Table of Contents

stated timeframe. Three of the Sale Assets closed between August 6, 2010 and December 31, 2010 and we earned approximately $2,700, which is included in the Gain on Sale of Joint Venture Interests for the year ended December 31, 2010. Additionally, we were entitled to earn leasing, development and disposition fees related to certain assets identified at the time of sale within the sale agreement. On June 11, 2010, we purchased an industrial property from the 2005 Development/Repositioning Joint Venture for a purchase price of $14,627.

On March 21, 2006, we entered into the 2006 Net Lease Co-Investment Program with an institutional investor to invest in industrial properties. We owned a 15% equity interest in and provided property management, asset management and leasing management services to the 2006 Net Lease Co-Investment Program. Pursuant to the buy/sell provision in the 2006 Net Lease Co-Investment Program’s governing agreement that our counterparty exercised on May 25, 2010, we sold our interest in the real estate property assets in the 2006 Net Lease Co-Investment Program to our counterparty and received $4,541 in net proceeds. In connection with the sale, we wrote off our carrying value for the 2006 Net Lease Co-Investment Program and recorded a $852 gain, which is included in Equity in Income (Loss) of Joint Ventures.

During July 2007, we entered into a management arrangement with an institutional investor to provide property management, leasing, acquisition, disposition and portfolio management services for three industrial properties (the “July 2007 Fund”). We do not own an equity interest in the July 2007 Fund, however we are entitled to incentive payments if certain economic thresholds related to the industrial properties are achieved. Effective September 2, 2009, we ceased to provide any services for two of the industrial properties in the July 2007 Fund. We received a one-time fee of approximately $866 in 2009 from the termination of the management agreement. Effective May 24, 2010, we ceased to provide any services to the remaining industrial property in the July 2007 Fund.

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, we have receivables from the Joint Ventures (and/or our former Joint Venture partners) in the aggregate amount of $137 and $2,857, respectively. These receivable amounts are included in Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recognized fees of $970, $4,952 and $11,174, respectively, from our Joint Ventures.

The combined summarized financial information of the investments in Joint Ventures is as follows:

 

     December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 

Condensed Combined Balance Sheets

    

Gross Real Estate Investment

   $ 155,555      $ 210,567   

Less: Accumulated Depreciation

     (41,342     (47,286
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Real Estate

     114,213        163,281   

Other Assets

     23,364        33,351   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 137,577      $ 196,632   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Debt

   $ 112,261      $ 157,431   

Other Liabilities

     5,779        10,849   

Equity

     19,537        28,352   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Equity

   $ 137,577      $ 196,632   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Company’s share of Equity

   $ 3,029      $ 4,344   

Basis Differentials(1)

     (1,564     (2,089
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Carrying Value of the Company’s investments in Joint Ventures

   $ 1,465      $ 2,255   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

  

 

(1) This amount represents the aggregate difference between our historical cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level. Basis differentials are primarily comprised of impairments we recorded to reduce certain of our investments in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture to fair value and certain deferred fees which are not reflected at the joint venture level.

 

75


Table of Contents

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2011      2010     2009  

Condensed Combined Statements of Operations

       

Total Revenues

   $ 16,799       $ 55,894      $ 85,426   

Expenses:

       

Operating and Other

     3,114         23,862        41,359   

Interest

     7,791         28,622        39,749   

Depreciation and Amortization

     7,312         27,202        47,487   

Impairment of Real Estate

     —           3,268        150,804   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Expenses

     18,217         82,954        279,399   

Income from Discontinued Operations (Including Gain on Sale of Real Estate of $3,137, $2,761 and $1,177 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively)

     2,674         1,942        1,799   

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

     —           808        8,603   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

   $ 1,256       $ (24,310   $ (183,571
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Company’s Share of Net Income (Loss)

   $ 980       $ 675      $ (1,276

Impairment on the Company’s Investments in Joint Ventures

     —           —          (5,194
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity in Income (Loss) of Joint Ventures

   $ 980       $ 675      $ (6,470
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

6. Indebtedness

The following table discloses certain information regarding our indebtedness:

 

    Outstanding Balance at     Interest
Rate at
December 31,
2011
  Effective
Interest
Rate at
Issuance
  Maturity
Date
    December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
       

Mortgage and Other Loans Payable, Net*

  $ 690,256      $ 486,055      4.45% – 9.25%   4.45% – 9.25%   January 2013 – October 2021

Unamortized Premiums*

    (305     (358      
 

 

 

   

 

 

       

Mortgage and Other Loans Payable, Gross*

  $ 689,951      $ 485,697         
 

 

 

   

 

 

       

Senior Unsecured Notes, Net

         

2016 Notes

  $ 159,455      $ 159,899      5.750%   5.91%   01/15/16

2017 Notes

    59,600        87,195      7.500%   7.52%   12/01/17

2027 Notes

    6,065        13,559      7.150%   7.11%   05/15/27

2028 Notes

    124,894        189,869      7.600%   8.13%   07/15/28

2012 Notes

    61,817        61,774      6.875%   6.85%   04/15/12

2032 Notes

    34,683        34,667      7.750%   7.87%   04/15/32

2014 Notes

    86,997        86,792      6.420%   6.54%   06/01/14

2011 Exchangeable Notes

    —          128,137      N/A   N/A   09/15/11

2017 II Notes

    106,716        117,637      5.950%   6.37%   05/15/17
 

 

 

   

 

 

       

Subtotal

  $ 640,227      $ 879,529         

Unamortized Discounts

    4,625        6,980         
 

 

 

   

 

 

       

Senior Unsecured Notes, Gross

  $ 644,852      $ 886,509         
 

 

 

   

 

 

       

Unsecured Credit Facility

  $ 149,000      $ 376,184      2.385%   2.385%   12/12/14
 

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

* Excludes $1,008 of Mortgage Loan Payable on Real Estate Held for Sale which is net of $48 of unamortized premiums as of December 31, 2010.

 

76


Table of Contents

Mortgage and Other Loans Payable, Net

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we originated or assumed the following mortgage loans:

 

Mortgage

Financing

  Loan
Principal
    Interest
Rate
    Origination/Assumption
Date
  Maturity
Date
  Amortization
Period
    Number of
Industrial
Properties
Collateralizing
Mortgage
    GLA
(In
millions)
    Property
Carrying
Value at
December 31,
2011
 

I - VIII

  $ 178,300        4.45   May 2, 2011   June 2018     30-year        32        5.9      $ 206,291   

IX

    24,417        5.579   May 26, 2011   February 2016     30-year        1        0.7        28,991   

X-XX

    77,600        4.85   September 23, 2011   October 2021     30-year        24        2.3        84,403   
 

 

 

               

 

 

 
  $ 280,317                  $ 319,685   
 

 

 

               

 

 

 

For Mortgage Financings I through VIII and Mortgage Financings X through XX, principal prepayments are prohibited for 12 months after loan origination, after which prepayment premiums are calculated at the greater of yield maintenance or 1% of the outstanding balance. For Mortgage Financing IX, principal prepayments are prohibited until three months prior to maturity, but defeasance is allowed subject to certain conditions.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we paid off and retired prior to maturity the following mortgage loans:

 

Loan

Principal Paid Off

  Interest
Rate
    Payoff
Date
  Maturity
Date
  (Loss) Gain on
Retirement  of
Debt
 
$14,520     6.75   February 10, 2011   September 2012   $ (213
18,662     7.50   March 9, 2011   December 2014     (813
27,389     7.50   April 1, 2011   October 2014     (1,104
2,091     7.54   November 30, 2011   January 2012     2   

 

       

 

 

 
$62,662         $ (2,128

 

       

 

 

 

On September 20, 2011, we transferred title to a property totaling approximately 0.4 million square feet of GLA and an escrow balance in the amount of $1,845 to a lender in satisfaction of a $5,040 non-recourse mortgage loan. We recognized a $147 loss related to the transaction, which is included in loss on retirement of debt for the year ended December 31, 2011.

On April 30, 2010, we prepaid and retired our secured mortgage debt maturing in September 2024 in the amount of $1,654, excluding a prepayment fee of $17, which is included in Loss from Retirement of Debt.

On December 1, 2010, we paid off and retired our secured mortgage debt maturing in December 2010 in the amount of $12,970.

As of December 31, 2011, mortgage and other loans payable are collateralized by, and in some instances cross-collateralized by, industrial properties with a net carrying value of $889,722 and one letter of credit in the amount of $537. We believe the Operating Partnership and the Company were in compliance with all covenants relating to mortgage loans payable as of December 31, 2011.

 

77


Table of Contents

Senior Unsecured Notes, Net

During the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we repurchased and retired the following senior unsecured notes prior to maturity:

 

     Principal Amount Repurchased      Purchase Price  
     For the
Year Ended
December 31,
2011
     For the
Year Ended
December 31,
2010
     For the
Year Ended
December 31,
2011
     For the
Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 

2011 Notes

   $ —         $ 143,498       $ —         $ 147,723   

2011 Exchangeable Notes

     —           18,000         —           17,936   

2012 Notes

     —           82,236         —           82,235   

2014 Notes

     1,144         21,062         1,143         17,964   

2016 Notes

     500         —           475         —     

2017 Notes

     27,619         —           27,506         —     

2017 II Notes

     10,969         —           10,182         —     

2027 Notes

     7,500         —           7,500         —     

2028 Notes

     65,025         —           63,861         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 112,757       $ 264,796       $ 110,667       $ 265,858   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

In connection with these repurchases prior to maturity, we recognized $2,012 and $4,096 as loss from retirement of debt for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, which is the difference between the repurchase price of $110,667 and $265,858, respectively, and the principal amount retired of $112,757 and $264,796, respectively, net of the pro rata write off of the unamortized debt issue discount, the unamortized loan fees, the unamortized settlement amount of the interest rate protection agreements and the professional services fees related to the repurchases of $135, $717, $3,250 and $0, respectively, and $1,707, $519, $(183) and $991 respectively.

On September 15, 2011, we paid off and retired our 2011 Exchangeable Notes, at maturity, in the amount of $128,900.

The indentures governing our senior unsecured notes contain certain covenants, including limitations on incurrence of debt and debt service coverage. We believe the Operating Partnership and the Company were in compliance with all covenants relating to senior unsecured debt as of December 31, 2011. However, these financial covenants are complex and there can be no assurance that these provisions would not be interpreted by our noteholders in a manner that could impose and cause us to incur material costs.

Unsecured Credit Facility

We have maintained an unsecured credit facility since 1997. Effective October 22, 2010, we amended our existing revolving credit facility to provide for a $200,000 term loan and a $200,000 revolving line of credit (together the “Old Credit Facility”). The Old Credit Facility was to mature on September 28, 2012. In connection with the amendment of the Old Credit Facility, we wrote off $191 of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the decreased capacity of the agreement, which is included in Loss from Retirement of Debt for the year ended December 31, 2010. During June 2011, we made a permanent repayment of $100,000 on the term loan of our Old Credit Facility.

During December 2011, we entered into a new $450,000 unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “Unsecured Credit Facility”) which replaced the Old Credit Facility. We may request that the borrowing capacity under the Unsecured Credit Facility be increased to $500,000, subject to certain restrictions. We wrote off $1,172 of unamortized deferred financing costs reflected in Loss from Retirement of Debt for the year ended December 31, 2011 related to the Old Credit Facility. The Unsecured Credit Facility provides for interest only payments initially at LIBOR plus 210 basis points or at a base rate plus 210 basis points, at our election, based on

 

78


Table of Contents

our leverage ratio. The Unsecured Credit Facility matures on December 12, 2014, unless extended an additional one year at our election, subject to certain conditions. At December 31, 2011, borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility bore interest at a weighted average interest rate of 2.385%.

The Unsecured Credit Facility contains certain covenants, including limitations on incurrence of debt and debt service coverage. Under the Unsecured Credit Facility, an event of default can also occur if the lenders, in their good faith judgment, determine that a material adverse change has occurred which could prevent timely repayment or materially impair our ability to perform our obligations under the loan agreement. We believe that we were in compliance with all covenants relating to the Unsecured Credit Facility as of December 31, 2011. However, these financial covenants are complex and there can be no assurance that these provisions would not be interpreted by our lenders in a manner that could impose and cause us to incur material costs.

The following is a schedule of the stated maturities and scheduled principal payments of our indebtedness, exclusive of premiums and discounts, for the next five years ending December 31, and thereafter:

 

     Amount  

2012

   $ 74,518   

2013

     13,164   

2014

     305,063   

2015

     62,088   

2016

     293,467   

Thereafter

     735,503   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,483,803   
  

 

 

 

Fair Value

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the fair value of our indebtedness was as follows:

 

     December 31, 2011      December 31, 2010  
     Carrying
Amount
     Fair
Value
     Carrying
Amount
     Fair
Value
 

Mortgage and Other Loans Payable, including mortgages Held for Sale

   $ 690,256       $ 743,419       $ 487,063       $ 548,696   

Senior Unsecured Debt

     640,227         630,622         879,529         851,771   

Unsecured Credit Facility

     149,000         149,000         376,184         376,184   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,479,483       $ 1,523,041       $ 1,742,776       $ 1,776,651   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The fair values of our mortgage loans payable and other loans payable were determined by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made based upon similar leverage levels and similar remaining maturities. The current market rates we utilized were internally estimated; therefore, we have concluded that our determination of fair value for our mortgage and other loans payable was primarily based upon Level 3 inputs. The fair value of the senior unsecured notes was determined by quoted market prices (Level 1) or, for certain senior unsecured notes that are thinly traded, were based upon transactions for senior unsecured notes with comparable maturities (Level 2). The fair value of the Unsecured Credit Facility was determined by discounting the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining term, assuming no repayment until maturity. The current market rate utilized for our Unsecured Credit Facility was internally estimated; therefore, we have concluded that our determination of fair value was primarily based upon Level 3 inputs.

 

79


Table of Contents

7. Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

On May 27, 2004, we issued 50,000 Depositary Shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of our 6.236%, $0.01 par value, Series F Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series F Preferred Stock”), at an initial offering price of $1,000.00 per Depositary Share. Dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock are cumulative from the date of initial issuance and are payable quarterly in arrears. The coupon rate of our Series F Preferred Stock resets every quarter at 2.375% plus the greater of (i) the 30 year Treasury CMT Rate, (ii) the 10 year Treasury CMT Rate or (iii) 3-month LIBOR. For the fourth quarter of 2011, the coupon rate was 5.365%. With respect to the payment of dividends and amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the Series F Preferred Stock ranks senior to payments on our Common Stock and pari passu with our Series G Preferred Stock (hereinafter defined), Series J Preferred Stock (hereinafter defined) and Series K Preferred Stock (hereinafter defined). In October 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to mitigate our exposure to floating interest rates related to the forecasted reset rate of the coupon rate of our Series F Preferred Stock (see Note 14 for further information on the agreement).

On May 27, 2004, we issued 25,000 Depositary Shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of our 7.236%, $0.01 par value, Series G Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series G Preferred Stock”), at an initial offering price of $1,000.00 per Depositary Share. Dividends on the Series G Preferred Stock are cumulative from the date of initial issuance and are payable semi-annually in arrears for the period from the date of original issuance of the Series G Preferred Stock through March 31, 2014 (the “Series G Initial Fixed Rate Period”), commencing on September 30, 2004, at a rate of 7.236% per annum of the liquidation preference (the “Series G Initial Distribution Rate”) (equivalent to $72.36 per Depositary Share). On or after March 31, 2014, the Series G Initial Distribution Rate is subject to reset, at our option, subject to certain conditions and parameters, at fixed or floating rates and periods. Fixed rates and periods will be determined through a remarketing procedure. Floating rates during floating rate periods will equal 2.500% (the initial credit spread), plus the greater of (i) the 3-month LIBOR, (ii) the 10 year Treasury CMT Rate, and (iii) the 30 year Treasury CMT Rate, reset quarterly. Dividends on the Series G Preferred Stock are payable semi-annually in arrears for fixed rate periods subsequent to the Series G Initial Fixed Rate Period and quarterly in arrears for floating rate periods. With respect to the payment of dividends and amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the Series G Preferred Stock ranks senior to payments on our Common Stock and pari passu with our Series F Preferred Stock, Series J Preferred Stock (hereinafter defined) and Series K Preferred Stock (hereinafter defined).

On January 13, 2006, we issued 6,000,000 Depositary Shares, each representing 1/10,000th of a share of our 7.25%, $.01 par value, Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series J Preferred Stock”), at an initial offering price of $25.00 per Depositary Share. The Series J Preferred Stock is redeemable in whole or in part, at our option, at a cash redemption price of $25.00 per depositary share. Dividends on the Series J Preferred Stock, represented by the Depositary Shares, are cumulative from the date of initial issuance and are payable quarterly in arrears. However, during any period that both (i) the depositary shares are not listed on the NYSE or AMEX, or quoted on NASDAQ, and (ii) we are not subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, but the preferred shares are outstanding, we will increase the dividend on the preferred shares to a rate of 8.25% of the liquidation preference per year. With respect to the payment of dividends and amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the Series J Preferred Stock ranks senior to payments on our Common Stock and pari passu with our Series F Preferred Stock, Series G Preferred Stock and Series K Preferred Stock (hereinafter defined).

On August 21, 2006, we issued 2,000,000 Depositary Shares, each representing 1/10,000th of a share of our 7.25%, $.01 par value, Series K Flexible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series K Preferred Stock”), at an initial offering price of $25.00 per Depositary Share. The Series K Preferred Stock is redeemable in whole or in part, at our option, at a cash redemption price of $25.00 per depositary share. Dividends on the Series K Preferred Stock, represented by the Depositary Shares, are cumulative from the date of initial issuance and are payable quarterly in arrears. With respect to the payment of dividends and amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the Series K Preferred Stock ranks senior to payments on our Common Stock and pari passu with our Series F Preferred Stock, Series G Preferred Stock and Series J Preferred Stock.

All series of preferred stock have no stated maturity (although we may redeem all such preferred stock on or following their optional redemption dates at our option, in whole or in part).

 

80


Table of Contents

Shares of Common Stock

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, 125,784, 27,586, and 415,466 shares of common stock, respectively, were converted from an equivalent number of units of limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (“Units”), resulting in a reclassification of $1,109, $316 and $7,817, respectively, of Noncontrolling Interest to First Industrial Realty Trust Inc.’s Stockholders’ Equity.

On May 12, 2011, we filed an amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation, increasing the number of shares of the Company’s common stock authorized for issuance from 100 million to 150 million shares.

On May 31, 2011, we announced an underwritten public offering of 8,400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $12.15 per share to the public. Gross offering proceeds upon settlement on June 6, 2011 were $102,060 in the aggregate. Proceeds to us, net of underwriter’s discount of $1,176 and total expenses of $138, were approximately $100,746.

On March 3, 2011, we announced an underwritten public offering of 8,900,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $11.40 per share to the public. Gross offering proceeds upon settlement on March 4, 2011 were $101,460 in the aggregate. Proceeds to us, net of underwriter’s discount of $890 and total expenses of $166, were approximately $100,404.

On October 5, 2009, the Company sold in an underwritten public offering 13,635,700 shares of its common stock at a price of $5.25 per share. Gross offering proceeds from the issuance were $71,587 in the aggregate. Proceeds to the Company, net of underwriters’ discount of $3,042 and total expenses of $765, were approximately $67,780.

On February 28, 2011, we entered into distribution agreements with sales agents to sell up to 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, for up to $100,000 aggregate gross sale proceeds, from time to time in “at-the-market” offerings (the “ATM”). During the year ended December 31, 2011, we issued 115,856 shares of the Company’s common stock under the ATM resulting in proceeds to us of approximately $1,391, net of $28 paid to the sales agent. Under the terms of the ATM, sales are to be made primarily in transactions that are deemed to be “at-the-market” offerings, including sales made directly on the New York Stock Exchange or sales made through a market maker other than on an exchange or by privately negotiated transactions.

On May 4, 2010, we entered into distribution agreements with sales agents to sell up to 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time in “at-the-market” offerings (the “Original ATM”). During the year ended December 31, 2010, we issued 5,469,767 shares of the Company’s common stock under the Original ATM for approximately $44,117, net of $900 paid to the sales agent. Under the terms of the Original ATM, sales were made primarily in transactions that were deemed to be “at-the-market” offerings, including sales made directly on the New York Stock Exchange or sales made through a market maker other than on an exchange or by privately negotiated transactions. On December 31, 2010, we concluded the Original ATM as a result of the expiration of the distribution agreements with our sales agents.

On August 8, 2008, the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”) became effective. Under the terms of the DRIP, stockholders who participate may reinvest all or part of their dividends in additional common stock of the Company at a discount from the market price, at our discretion, when the shares are issued and sold directly by us from authorized but unissued shares of the Company’s common stock. Stockholders and non-stockholders may also purchase additional shares at a discounted price, at our discretion, when the shares are issued and sold directly by us from authorized but unissued shares of the Company’s common stock, by making optional cash payments, subject to certain dollar thresholds. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we did not issue any shares of the Company’s common stock under the direct stock purchase component of the DRIP. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we issued 875,402 shares of the Company’s common stock under the direct stock purchase component of the DRIP for approximately $5,970. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 3,034,120 shares under the direct stock purchase component of the DRIP for $15,920.

 

81


Table of Contents

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we awarded 23,567 and 50,445 shares, respectively, of common stock to certain directors. The common stock shares had a fair value of approximately $128 and $240, respectively, upon issuance.

The following table is a roll-forward of our shares of common stock outstanding, including unvested restricted shares of common stock (see Note 13), for the three years ended December 31, 2011:

 

     Shares of
Common Stock
Outstanding
 

Balance at December 31, 2008

     44,652,182   

Issuance of Common Stock, including Issuance of Restricted Stock Units

     16,874,884   

Issuance of Restricted Stock Shares

     35,145   

Repurchase and Retirement of Restricted Stock Shares

     (132,463

Conversion of Operating Partnership Units

     415,466   
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2009

     61,845,214   
  

 

 

 

Issuance of Common Stock, including Issuance of Restricted Stock Units

     6,518,736   

Issuance of Restricted Stock Shares

     573,198   

Repurchase and Retirement of Restricted Stock Shares

     (123,438

Conversion of Operating Partnership Units

     27,586   
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

     68,841,296   
  

 

 

 

Issuance of Common Stock, including Issuance of Restricted Stock Units

     17,646,586   

Issuance of Restricted Stock Shares

     292,339   

Repurchase and Retirement of Restricted Stock Shares

     (98,603

Conversion of Operating Partnership Units

     125,784   
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

     86,807,402   
  

 

 

 

Dividends/Distributions

The coupon rate of our Series F Preferred Stock resets every quarter at 2.375% plus the greater of (i) the 30 year Treasury CMT Rate, (ii) the 10 year Treasury CMT Rate or (iii) 3-month LIBOR. For the fourth quarter of 2011, the new coupon rate was 5.365%. See Note 14 for additional derivative information related to the Series F Preferred Stock coupon rate reset.

The following table summarizes dividends/distributions declared for the past three years:

 

     Year Ended 2011      Year Ended 2010      Year Ended 2009  
     Dividend/
Distribution
per Share/
Unit
     Total
Dividend/
Distribution
     Dividend/
Distribution
per Share/
Unit
     Total
Dividend/
Distribution
     Dividend/
Distribution
per Share/
Unit
     Total
Dividend/
Distribution
 

Common Stock/Operating Partnership Units

   $ 0.0000       $ —         $ 0.0000       $ —         $ 0.0000       $ —     

Series F Preferred Stock

   $ 6,510.9028       $ 3,256       $ 6,736.1540       $ 3,368       $ 6,414.5700       $ 3,207   

Series G Preferred Stock

   $ 7,236.0000       $ 1,809       $ 7,236.0000       $ 1,809       $ 7,236.0000       $ 1,809   

Series J Preferred Stock

   $ 18,125.2000       $ 10,875       $ 18,125.2000       $ 10,875       $ 18,125.2000       $ 10,875   

Series K Preferred Stock

   $ 18,125.2000       $ 3,625       $ 18,125.2000       $ 3,625       $ 18,125.2000       $ 3,625   

 

82


Table of Contents

8. Supplemental Information to Statements of Cash Flows

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
2011
    Year Ended
December 31,
2010
    Year Ended
December 31,
2009
 

Interest paid, net of capitalized interest

   $ 100,375      $ 105,276      $ 115,990   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Capitalized Interest

   $ 437      $ —        $ 281   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income Taxes Paid (Refunded)

   $ 1,876      $ 3,663      $ (54,173
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:

      

Distribution payable on preferred stock

   $ 4,763      $ 452      $ 452   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Exchange of units for common stock:

      

Noncontrolling interest

   $ (1,109   $ (316   $ (7,817

Common stock

     1        1        4   

Additional paid-in-capital

     1,108        315        7,813   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ —        $ —        $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property Transfer to Lender in Satisfaction of Non-Recourse Mortgage Loan:

      

Net Investment of Real Estate

   $ (3,200   $ —        $ —     

Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net

     (1,987     —          —     

Mortgage Loan Payable, Net

     5,040        —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from Retirement of Debt

   $ (147   $ —        $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Mortgage loan payable assumed in conjunction with a property acquisition

   $ (24,417   $ —        $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Notes receivable issued in conjunction with certain property sales

   $ 7,029      $ 168      $ 20,645   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Write-off of fully depreciated assets

   $ (58,357   $ (59,485   $ (55,089
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

83


Table of Contents

9. Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)

The computation of basic and diluted EPS is presented below:

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
2011
    Year Ended
December 31,
2010
    Year Ended
December 31,
2009
 

Numerator:

      

Loss from Continuing Operations

   $ (32,201   $ (155,699   $ (20,327

Gain on Sale of Real Estate, Net of Income Tax Provision

     918        517        231   

Noncontrolling Interest Allocable to Continuing Operations

     3,097        13,623        4,019   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from Continuing Operations Attributable to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.

     (28,186     (141,559     (16,077

Preferred Stock Dividends

     (19,565     (19,677     (19,516
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from Continuing Operations Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders

   $ (47,751   $ (161,236   $ (35,593
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax Provision

   $ 22,093      $ (66,437   $ 24,282   

Noncontrolling Interest Allocable to Discontinued Operations

     (1,352     5,175        (2,472
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations Attributable to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.

   $ 20,741      $ (61,262   $ 21,810   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Loss Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders

   $ (27,010   $ (222,498   $ (13,783
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Denominator:

      

Weighted Average Shares—Basic and Diluted

     80,616,000        62,952,565        48,695,317   

Basic and Diluted EPS:

      

Loss from Continuing Operations Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders

   $ (0.59   $ (2.56   $ (0.73
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations Attributable to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders

   $ 0.26      $ (0.97   $ 0.45   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Loss Available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s Common Stockholders

   $ (0.34   $ (3.53   $ (0.28
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Participating securities include 673,381, 662,092 and 355,645 of unvested restricted stock awards outstanding at December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 respectively, which participate in non-forfeitable dividends of the Company. Participating security holders are not obligated to share in losses, therefore, none of the net loss attributable to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. was allocated to participating securities for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

 

84


Table of Contents

The number of weighted average shares—diluted is the same as the number of weighted average shares—basic for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 as the effect of stock options and restricted unit awards (that do not participate in non-forfeitable dividends of the Company) was excluded as its inclusion would have been antidilutive to the loss from continuing operations available to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.’s common stockholders. The following awards were anti-dilutive and could be dilutive in future periods:

 

     Number of
Awards
Outstanding At
December 31,
2011
     Number of
Awards
Outstanding At
December 31,
2010
     Number of
Awards
Outstanding At
December 31,
2009
 

Non-Participating Securities:

        

Restricted Unit Awards

     731,900         1,012,800         1,218,800   

Options

     25,201         98,701         139,700   

10. Income Taxes

For income tax purposes, distributions paid to common shareholders are classified as ordinary income, capital gain, return of capital or qualified dividends. We did not pay common share distributions for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

For income tax purposes, distributions paid to preferred shareholders are classified as ordinary income, capital gain, return of capital or qualified dividends. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the preferred distributions per depositary share were classified as follows:

 

Series J Preferred Stock

   2011      As a
Percentage

of
Distributions
    2010 (As
Amended)
     As a
Percentage

of
Distributions
    2009      As a
Percentage

of
Distributions
 

Ordinary income

   $ 0.3130         23.02   $ 1.4652         80.84   $ —           0.00

Long-term capital gains

     —           0.00     —           0.00     1.3697         75.57

Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain

     —           0.00     0.2423         13.37     0.4428         24.43

Return of Capital

     1.0402         76.52     —           0.00     —           0.00

Qualified Dividends

     0.0062         0.46     0.1050         5.79     —           0.00
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 1.3594         100.00   $ 1.8125         100.00   $ 1.8125         100.00
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Series K Preferred Stock

   2011      As a
Percentage

of
Distributions
    2010 (As
Amended)
     As a
Percentage

of
Distributions
    2009      As a
Percentage

of
Distributions
 

Ordinary income

   $ 0.3130         23.02   $ 1.4652         80.84   $ —           0.00

Long-term capital gains

     —           0.00     —           0.00     1.3697         75.57

Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain

     —           0.00     0.2423         13.37     0.4428         24.43

Return of Capital

     1.0402         76.52     —           0.00     —           0.00

Qualified Dividends

     0.0062         0.46     0.1050         5.79     —           0.00
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 1.3594         100.00   $ 1.8125         100.00   $ 1.8125         100.00
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

The 2010 tax characterization of preferred dividends disclosed in this footnote in the 2010 Form 10-K contained an error. The impact of the error affects the treatment of our preferred distributions for tax purposes only. The correction results in an increase in the ordinary income classification of $1.4529, an increase in the qualified dividend classification of $0.0222, an increase in the unrecaptured Section 1250 gain classification of $0.0706, and a decrease in the amount of distributions classified as return of capital of ($1.5457), all per depository share of our Series J and Series K preferred shares.

 

85


Table of Contents

The components of income tax (provision) benefit for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are comprised of the following:

 

     2011     2010     2009  

Current:

      

Federal

   $ (622   $ (893   $ 38,682   

State

     (502     (2,372     1,772   

Foreign

     (41     (95     (835

Deferred:

      

Federal.

     (284     163        (15,816

State

     (2     40        (616

Foreign.

     (697     (148     9   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ (2,148   $ (3,305   $ 23,196   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

On August 24, 2009, we received a private letter ruling from the IRS granting favorable loss treatment under Sections 331 and 336 of the Code on the tax liquidation of one of our old taxable REIT subsidiaries. As a result, we completed a transaction on September 1, 2009 whereby approximately 75% of the assets formerly held by this taxable REIT subsidiary are now held by a limited liability company which is wholly owned by the Operating Partnership. The remaining 25% of the assets are now held by a partnership for federal income tax purposes, and is 99% owned by one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries formed in 2009. On November 6, 2009, legislation was signed that allows businesses with net operating losses for 2008 or 2009 to carry back those losses for up to five years. As a result, we received a refund from the IRS of $40,418 in the fourth quarter of 2009 due to the tax liquidation of one of our old taxable REIT subsidiaries.

Deferred income taxes represent the tax effect of the temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets (liabilities) include the following as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

     2011     2010  

Investments in Joint Ventures

   $ 15      $ 47   

Fixed assets

     —          1,863   

Prepaid rent

     45        71   

Restricted stock

     43        99   

Capitalized Interest

     —          626   

Impairment of Real Estate

     5,683        10,196   

Foreign net operating loss carrying forward

     828        706   

Valuation Allowance

     (5,078     (9,301

Other

     483        569   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets, net of allowance

   $ 2,019      $ 4,876   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Straight-line rent

     (85     (510

Fixed assets

     (1,946     (3,397

Other

     (108     (106
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   $ (2,139   $ (4,013
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net deferred tax (liability) asset

   $ (120   $ 863   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

A valuation allowance is recorded if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. We do not have projections of future taxable income in the taxable REIT subsidiaries significant enough to allow us to realize our deferred tax assets. Therefore, we have recorded a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. An increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and which causes a change in our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax assets, is included in the current tax provision.

 

86


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had net deferred tax (liability) assets of $(120) and $863, after valuation allowances of $5,078 and $9,301, respectively. The decrease in the valuation allowance of $4,223 from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011 is primarily related to a decrease in net deferred tax assets and liabilities due to sales of property. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had net deferred tax assets of $863 and $776, after valuation allowances of $9,301 and $1,299, respectively. The increase in the valuation allowance of $8,002 from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 is primarily related to an increase in net deferred tax assets due to the impairment of real estate.

The components of income tax (provision) benefit for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

 

     2011     2010     2009  

Tax provision associated with income from operations on sold properties which is included in discontinued operations

   $ (119   $ —        $ (384

Tax provision associated with gains and losses on the sale of real estate which is included in discontinued operations

     (1,127     —          (1,462

Tax provision associated with gains and losses on the sale of real estate

     (452     (342     (143

Income tax (provision) benefit

     (450     (2,963     25,185   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax (provision) benefit

   $ (2,148   $ (3,305   $ 23,196   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The income tax (provision) benefit pertaining to income from continuing operations and gain on sale of real estate differs from the amounts computed by applying the applicable federal statutory rate as follows:

 

     2011     2010     2009  

Tax (provision) benefit at federal rate related to continuing operations

   $ (2,162   $ 5,141      $ 8,574   

State tax (provision) benefit, net of federal (provision) benefit

     (521     (2,320     1,849   

Non-deductible permanent items, net

     (54     (58     (1,652

Change in valuation allowance

     1,853        (6,108     16,269   

Foreign taxes, net

     (96     (211     342   

Other

     78        251        (340
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income tax (provision) benefit

   $ (902   $ (3,305   $ 25,042   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Michigan Tax Issue

As of December 31, 2008, we had paid approximately $1,400 (representing tax and interest for the years 1997-2000) to the State of Michigan regarding business loss carryforwards the appropriateness of which was the subject of litigation initiated by us. On December 11, 2007, the Michigan Court of Claims rendered a decision against us regarding the business loss carryforwards. Also, the court ruled against us on an alternative position involving Michigan’s Capital Acquisition Deduction. We filed an appeal to the Michigan Appeals Court in January 2008; however, as a result of the lower court’s decision, an additional approximately $800 (representing tax and interest for the year 2001) had been accrued through June 30, 2009 for both tax and financial statement purposes. On August 18, 2009, the Michigan Appeals Court issued a decision in our favor on the business loss carryforward issue. The Michigan Department of Treasury appealed the decision to the Michigan Supreme Court on September 29, 2009; however, we believed there was a very low probability that the Michigan Supreme Court would accept the case. Therefore, in September 2009 we reversed our accrual of $800 (related to the 2001 tax year) and set up a receivable of $1,400 for the amount paid in 2006 (related to the 1997-2000 tax years), resulting

 

87


Table of Contents

in an aggregate reversal of prior tax expense of approximately $2,200. On April 23, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Michigan Appeals Court and reinstated the decision of the Michigan Court of Claims. Based on the most recent ruling of the Michigan Supreme Court, we reversed the receivable of $1,400 and paid approximately $800, for a total of approximately $2,200 of tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2010, which is included in continuing operations.

11. Restructuring Costs

We committed to a plan to reduce organizational and overhead costs in October 2008 and subsequently modified that plan during 2011, 2010 and 2009 with the goal of further reducing these costs. The following summarizes our restructuring costs for each of the years ended December 31:

 

     2011      2010      2009  

Pre-tax restructuring costs:

        

Employee severance and benefits*

   $ —         $ 525       $ 5,186   

Termination of certain office leases

     1,200         647         1,867   

Other

     353         686         753   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total restructuring costs

   $ 1,553       $ 1,858       $ 7,806   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Included in Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities, Net related to severance obligations, remaining lease payments and other costs incurred but not yet paid

   $ 1,959       $ 1,574       $ 2,884   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

  

 

* Includes $0, $156, and $2,931, respectively, of non-cash costs which represents the accelerated recognition of restricted stock expense for certain employees for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

12. Future Rental Revenues

Our properties are leased to tenants under net and semi-net operating leases. Minimum lease payments receivable, excluding tenant reimbursements of expenses, under non-cancelable operating leases in effect as of December 31, 2011 are approximately as follows:

 

2012

   $ 239,347   

2013

     196,288   

2014

     157,012   

2015

     125,439   

2016

     94,840   

Thereafter

     326,295   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,139,221   
  

 

 

 

13. Stock Based Compensation

We maintain five stock incentive plans (the “Stock Incentive Plans”) which are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. There are 11.5 million shares authorized for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plans. Only officers, certain employees, our Independent Directors and our affiliates generally are eligible to participate in the Stock Incentive Plans.

The Stock Incentive Plans authorize (i) the grant of stock options that qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code, (ii) the grant of stock options that do not so qualify, (iii) restricted stock/Unit awards (including awards subject to performance conditions), and (iv) dividend equivalent rights. The exercise price of the stock options is determined by the Compensation Committee. Special provisions apply to awards

 

88


Table of Contents

granted under the Stock Incentive Plans in the event of a change in control in the Company. As of December 31, 2011, awards covering 1.9 million shares of common stock were available to be granted under the Stock Incentive Plans.

At December 31, 2011, all outstanding stock options are vested. Stock option transactions for the year ended December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:

 

     Options     Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
     Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding at December 31, 2010

     98,701      $ 32.34       $ —     

Expired or Terminated

     (73,500   $ 32.61      
  

 

 

      

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

     25,201      $ 31.57       $ —     
  

 

 

      

The following table summarizes currently outstanding and exercisable options as of December 31, 2011:

 

    Number
Outstanding
and
Exercisable
   Remaining
Contractual  Life
     Exercise
Price
 

January 2002 Grants

  15,201      0.04       $ 30.53   

May 2002 Grants

  10,000      0.37       $ 33.15   

In September 1994, the Board of Directors approved and we adopted a 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan. Under our 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan, all eligible employees may participate by making voluntary contributions. We may make, but are not required to make, matching contributions. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, matching contributions of $197, $194 and $0, respectively were recorded.

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we awarded 292,339, 573,198 and 1,473,600 restricted stock and unit awards to our employees having a fair value at grant date of $3,248, $3,336 and $7,406, respectively. We also awarded 0, 0 and 35,145 restricted stock awards to our directors having a fair value at grant date of $0, $0 and $149 respectively. Restricted stock awards granted to employees generally vest over a period of three to four years and restricted stock awards granted to directors generally vest over a period of five years. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recognized $3,759, $6,040 and $13,015 in restricted stock amortization related to restricted stock and unit awards, of which $0, $0 and $45, respectively, was capitalized in connection with development activities. At December 31, 2011, we have $5,141 in unearned compensation related to unvested restricted stock awards. The weighted average period that the unrecognized compensation is expected to be incurred is 0.79 years.

Restricted stock award and restricted stock unit award transactions for the year ended December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:

 

     Awards     Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Outstanding at December 31, 2010

     1,674,892      $ 7.26   

Issued

     292,339      $ 11.11   

Forfeited

     (51,024   $ 11.59   

Vested

     (510,926   $ 9.74   
  

 

 

   

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

     1,405,281      $ 7.00   
  

 

 

   

 

89


Table of Contents

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we made a grant of 1,000,000 restricted stock units to our Chief Executive Officer. These restricted stock units had a fair value of approximately $6,014 on the date of issuance. Of these restricted stock units, a total of 600,000 (the “Service Awards”) vest in four equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth year anniversary of December 31, 2008, and a total of 400,000 (the “Performance Awards I”) vest in four installments of up to 100,000 on the first, up to 200,000 on the second, up to 300,000 on the third and up to 400,000 on the fourth year anniversary of December 31, 2008, to the extent certain market conditions are met. The market conditions are met when certain stock price levels are achieved and maintained for certain time periods between the award issuance date and December 31, 2013. Both the Service Awards and Performance Awards I require the Chief Executive Officer to be employed by the Company at the applicable vesting dates, subject to certain clauses in the award agreement. The Service Awards are amortized over the four year service period. The Performance Awards I are amortized over the service period of each installment. As of December 31, 2011, there have been 525,000 Service and Performance Awards I issued.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we made a grant of 473,600 restricted stock units to certain members of management (the “Performance Awards II”). The Performance Awards II had a fair value of approximately $1,392 on the date of issuance and will vest in four installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of June 30, 2009, to the extent certain service periods and market conditions are both met. The market conditions are met when certain stock price levels are achieved and maintained for certain time periods between the award issuance date and June 30, 2014. The Performance Awards II are amortized over the service period of each installment. In conjunction with the issuance of the Performance Awards II, the members of management were also granted cash awards with a fair value of $792. The cash awards vested on June 30, 2010 and compensation expense was recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period. In order to receive the Performance Awards II, the members of management are required to be employed by the Company at the applicable vesting dates, subject to certain clauses in the award agreements. As of December 31, 2011, there have been 39,100 Performance Awards II issued.

The fair value of the Performance Awards I and the Performance Awards II at issuance was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model with the following assumptions:

 

     Performance
Awards I
    Performance
Awards II
 

Expected dividend yield

     0.0     0.0

Expected stock volatility

     57.18% to 119.55     76.29% to 162.92

Risk-free interest rate

     0.40% to 1.84     0.43% to 2.38

Expected life (years)

     1-4        1-4   

Grant Date Fair value

   $ 4.49      $ 2.94   

During the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, certain members of management were granted cash awards with a fair value of $1,810 and $688, respectively. The cash awards vest on June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, respectively, and compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period. In order to receive the cash awards, the members of management are required to be employed by the Company at the vesting date, subject to certain clauses of the award agreements.

14. Derivatives

Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our cash flow volatility and exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

Our Series F Preferred Stock is subject to a coupon rate reset. The coupon rate resets every quarter at 2.375% plus the greater of i) the 30 year Treasury CMT Rate, ii) the 10 year Treasury CMT Rate or iii) 3-month

 

90


Table of Contents

LIBOR. For the fourth quarter of 2011, the new coupon rate was 5.365% (see Note 7). In October 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $50,000 to mitigate our exposure to floating interest rates related to the forecasted reset rate of the coupon rate of our Series F Preferred Stock (the “Series F Agreement”). This Series F Agreement fixes the 30-year U.S. Treasury rate at 5.2175%. Accounting guidance for derivatives does not permit hedge accounting treatment related to equity instruments and therefore the mark to market gains or losses related to this agreement are recorded in the statement of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, losses of $1,718 and $1,107, respectively, is recognized as Mark-to-Market Loss on Interest Rate Protection Agreements. Quarterly payments are treated as a component of the mark to market gains or losses and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, which totaled $574 and $492, respectively.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”) and is subsequently reclassified to earnings through interest expense over the life of the derivative or over the life of the debt. In the next 12 months, we will amortize approximately $2,255 into net income by increasing interest expense for interest rate protection agreements we settled in previous periods.

The following is a summary of the terms of our derivatives and their fair values, which are included in Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities, Net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets:

 

Hedge Product

   Notional
Amount
     Strike     Trade
Date
     Maturity
Date
     Fair Value
As of

December 31,
2011
    Fair Value
As of

December 31,
2010
 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

               

Series F Agreement*

     50,000         5.2175    
 
October
2008
  
  
    
 
October
1, 2013
  
  
   $ (1,667   $ (523

 

* Fair value excludes quarterly settlement payment due on Series F Agreement. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the outstanding payable was $280 and $194, respectively.

The following is a summary of the impact of the derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships on the statement of operations and the statement of OCI for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

          Year Ended  

Interest Rate Products

  

Location on Statement

   December 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 

Loss Recognized in OCI (Effective Portion)

   Mark-to-Market on Interest Rate Protection Agreements (OCI)    $ —        $ 990   

Amortization Reclassified from OCI into Earnings

   Interest Expense    $ (2,166   $ (2,108

During 2010, the 2006 Land/Development Joint Venture had interest rate protection agreements outstanding which effectively converted floating rate debt to fixed rate debt on a portion of its total variable debt. The hedge relationships were considered highly effective and as such, for the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded $1,137 in unrealized gain, representing our 10% share, offset by $414 of income tax provision, which is shown in Mark-to-Market on Interest Rate Protection Agreements, Net of Income Tax, in OCI. In connection with the sale of our equity interest of the 2006 Land/Development Joint Venture on August 5, 2010, we wrote off $1,625 that was recorded in OCI related to our 10% share of unrealized loss related to the interest rate protection agreements.

 

91


Table of Contents

Our agreements with our derivative counterparties contain provisions where if we default on any of our indebtedness, then we could also be declared in default on our derivative obligations subject to certain thresholds.

The guidance for fair value measurement of financial instruments includes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

The following table sets forth our financial liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

           Fair Value Measurements at Reporting
Date Using:
 

Description

   Fair Value     Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for

Identical Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other

Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Liabilities:

          

Series F Agreement at December 31, 2011

   $ (1,667     —           —         $ (1,667

Series F Agreement at December 31, 2010

   $ (523     —           —         $ (523

The valuation of the Series F Agreement is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the instrument. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the agreements including the period to maturity. In adjusting the fair value of the interest rate protection agreements for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements. To comply with the provisions of fair value measurement, we incorporated a credit valuation adjustment (“CVA”) to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. However, assessing significance of inputs is a matter of judgment that should consider a variety of factors. One factor we consider is the CVA and its materiality to the overall valuation of the derivatives on the balance sheet and to their related changes in fair value. We consider the Series F Agreement to be classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to a significant number of unobservable inputs. The Series F Agreement swaps a fixed rate 5.2175% for floating rate payments based on 30-year Treasury. No market observable prices exist for long-dated Treasuries. Therefore, we have classified the Series F Agreement in its entirety as a Level 3.

The following table presents a reconciliation of our liabilities classified as Level 3 at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

     Fair Value
Measurements

Using Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3) Derivatives
 

Ending asset balance at December 31, 2009

   $ 93   

Total unrealized losses:

  

Mark-to-Market on Series F Agreement

     (616
  

 

 

 

Ending liability balance at December 31, 2010

   $ (523

Total unrealized losses:

  

Mark-to-Market on Series F Agreement

     (1,144
  

 

 

 

Ending liability balance at December 31, 2011

   $ (1,667
  

 

 

 

 

92


Table of Contents

15. Commitments and Contingencies

Twelve properties have leases granting the tenants options to purchase the property. Such options are exercisable at various times at appraised fair market value or at a fixed purchase price in excess of our depreciated cost of the asset. We have no notice of any exercise of any tenant purchase option.

At December 31, 2011, we had letters of credit outstanding and performance bonds in the aggregate amount of $6,780. These letters of credit expire between February 2012 and July 2013.

In the normal course of business, we are involved in legal actions arising from the ownership of our industrial properties. In our opinion, the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such legal actions are not expected to have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, operations or liquidity.

Ground and Operating Lease Agreements

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recognized $1,955, $3,047 and $4,181, respectively, in operating and ground lease expense.

Future minimum rental payments under the terms of all non-cancelable ground and operating leases under which we are the lessee, offset by sub-lease rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases, as of December 31, 2011, are as follows:

 

2012

   $ 1,892   

2013

     1,724   

2014

     1,448   

2015

     1,319   

2016

     1,321   

Thereafter

     28,052   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 35,756   
  

 

 

 

16. Subsequent Events

From January 1, 2012 to February 28, 2012, we acquired one industrial property comprising approximately 0.4 million square feet of GLA in connection with the purchase of the 85% equity interest in one property from the institutional investor in the 2003 Net Lease Joint Venture. The acquisition was funded through the assumption of a mortgage loan in the amount of $12,026, which was subsequently paid off at closing and a cash payment of $8,324. We will account for this transaction as a step acquisition utilizing the purchase method of accounting. There were no industrial properties sold during this time.

From January 1, 2012 to February 28, 2012, we repurchased and retired $430 of our senior unsecured notes maturing in 2028 for a payment of $406.

17. Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)

The following tables summarize our quarterly financial information. The first, second and third fiscal quarters of 2011 and all fiscal quarters in 2010 have been revised in accordance with guidance on accounting for discontinued operations. The results of operations for the fourth quarter of 2010 include $2,387 which should have been recorded as part of the impairment charge recorded during the third quarter in 2010. Management evaluated this impairment charge and believes it is not material to the results of operations of either quarter.

 

93


Table of Contents

Net loss available to common stockholders and basic and diluted EPS from net loss available to common stockholders has not been affected.

 

     Year Ended December 31, 2011  
     First
Quarter
    Second
Quarter
    Third
Quarter
    Fourth
Quarter
 

Total Revenues

   $ 80,186      $ 79,386      $ 78,586      $ 79,677   

Equity in Income of Joint Ventures

     36        99        772        73   

Noncontrolling Interest Allocable to Continuing Operations

     877        526        952        798   

Loss from Continuing Operations, Net of Income Tax and Noncontrolling Interest

     (6,611     (3,260     (10,450     (8,727

Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax

     3,105        3,692        5,947        9,349   

Noncontrolling Interest Allocable to Discontinued Operations

     (224     (236     (349     (543

Gain on Sale of Real Estate, Net of Income Tax

     —          —          918        —     

Noncontrolling Interest Allocable to Gain on Sale of Real Estate

     —          —          (56     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income Attributable to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.

     (3,730     196        (3,990     79   

Preferred Stock Dividends

     (4,927     (4,947     (4,928     (4,763
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Loss Available to Common Stockholders

   $ (8,657   $ (4,751   $ (8,918   $ (4,684
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share:

        

Loss From Continuing Operations Available

   $ (0.16   $ (0.10   $ (0.17   $ (0.16
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from Discontinued Operations

   $ 0.04      $ 0.04      $ 0.07      $ 0.10   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Loss Available to Common Stockholders

   $ (0.12   $ (0.06   $ (0.10   $ (0.05
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

     70,639        79,727        85,930        85,941   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

94


Table of Contents

 

     Year Ended December 31, 2010  
     First
Quarter
    Second
Quarter
    Third
Quarter
    Fourth
Quarter
 

Total Revenues

   $ 82,709      $ 80,756      $ 78,186      $ 80,127   

Equity in (Loss) Income of Joint Ventures

     (459     582        (398     950   

Noncontrolling Interest Allocable to Continuing Operations

     2,309        1,870        7,419        2,065   

Loss from Continuing Operations, Net of Income Tax and Noncontrolling Interest

     (21,776     (17,308     (81,979     (20,973

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax

     4,544        4,069        (72,873     (2,177

Noncontrolling Interest Allocable to Discontinued Operations

     (356     (309     5,664        176   

Gain (Loss) on Sale of Real Estate, Net of Income Tax

     731        —          (214     —     

Noncontrolling Interest Allocable to Gain (Loss) on Sale of Real Estate

     (57     —          17        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Loss Attributable to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.

     (16,914     (13,548     (149,385     (22,974

Preferred Stock Dividends

     (4,960     (4,979     (4,884     (4,854
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Loss Available to Common Stockholders

   $ (21,874   $ (18,527   $ (154,269   $ (27,828
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share:

        

Loss From Continuing Operations Available

   $ (0.42   $ (0.35   $ (1.38   $ (0.40
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

   $ 0.07      $ 0.06      $ (1.07   $ (0.03
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Loss Available to Common Stockholders

   $ (0.35   $ (0.29   $ (2.44   $ (0.43
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

     61,797        62,838        63,100        64,049   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

95


Table of Contents

 

SCHEDULE REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousand)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

Atlanta

                     

4250 River Green Parkway

  Duluth, GA   $ —        $ 264      $ 1,522      $ (67   $ 214      $ 1,505      $ 1,719      $ 710        1994        (l

3450 Corporate Parkway

  Duluth, GA     —          506        2,904        (823     284        2,303        2,587        1,214        1994        (l

1650 Highway 155

  McDonough, GA     —          788        4,544        (1,205     365        3,762        4,127        2,073        1994        (l

1665 Dogwood Drive

  Conyers, GA     —          635        3,662        587        635        4,249        4,884        1,789        1994        (l

1715 Dogwood

  Conyers, GA     —          288        1,675        783        228        2,518        2,746        893        1994        (l

11235 Harland Drive

  Covington, GA     —          125        739        169        125        908        1,033        377        1994        (l

4051 Southmeadow Parkway

  Atlanta, GA     —          726        4,130        875        726        5,005        5,731        2,002        1994        (l

4071 Southmeadow Parkway

  Atlanta, GA     —          750        4,460        1,631        828        6,013        6,841        2,435        1994        (l

4081 Southmeadow Parkway

  Atlanta, GA     —          1,012        5,918        1,651        1,157        7,424        8,581        3,048        1994        (l

5570 Tulane Dr (d)

  Atlanta, GA     2,281        527        2,984        990        546        3,955        4,501        1,369        1996        (l

955 Cobb Place

  Kennesaw, GA     3,018        780        4,420        754        804        5,150        5,954        2,010        1997        (l

1005 Sigman Road

  Conyers, GA     2,118        566        3,134        433        574        3,559        4,133        1,034        1999        (l

2050 East Park Drive

  Conyers, GA     —          452        2,504        143        459        2,640        3,099        799        1999        (l

1256 Oakbrook Drive

  Norcross, GA     1,243        336        1,907        210        339        2,114        2,453        523        2001        (l

1265 Oakbrook Drive

  Norcross, GA     1,170        307        1,742        259        309        1,999        2,308        510        2001        (l

1280 Oakbrook Drive

  Norcross, GA     1,211        281        1,592        313        283        1,903        2,186        550        2001        (l

1300 Oakbrook Drive

  Norcross, GA     1,699        420        2,381        267        423        2,645        3,068        685        2001        (l

1325 Oakbrook Drive

  Norcross, GA     1,349        332        1,879        224        334        2,101        2,435        526        2001        (l

1351 Oakbrook Drive

  Norcross, GA     —          370        2,099        (992     146        1,331        1,477        584        2001        (l

1346 Oakbrook Drive

  Norcross, GA     —          740        4,192        (715     352        3,865        4,217        1,312        2001        (l

1412 Oakbrook Drive

  Norcross, GA     —          313        1,776        (1,053     101        935        1,036        438        2001        (l

3060 South Park Blvd

  Ellenwood, GA     —          1,600        12,464        1,590        1,604        14,050        15,654        3,469        2003        (l

Greenwood Industrial Park

  McDonough, GA     4,580        1,550        —          7,485        1,550        7,485        9,035        1,384        2004        (l

46 Kent Drive

  Cartersville GA     1,779        794        2,252        6        798        2,254        3,052        556        2005        (l

100 Dorris Williams

  Villa Rica GA     1,640        401        3,754        (749     406        3,000        3,406        548        2005        (l

605 Stonehill Drive

  Atlanta, GA     1,571        485        1,979        (38     490        1,936        2,426        1,155        2005        (l

5095 Phillip Lee Drive

  Atlanta, GA     4,982        735        3,627        588        740        4,210        4,950        1,763        2005        (l

6514 Warren Drive

  Norcross, GA     —          510        1,250        (61     513        1,186        1,699        271        2005        (l

6544 Warren Drive

  Norcross, GA     —          711        2,310        284        715        2,590        3,305        570        2005        (l

5356 E. Ponce De Leon

  Stone Mountain,
GA
    2,765        604        3,888        208        610        4,090        4,700        1,498        2005        (l

 

S-1


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

5390 E. Ponce De Leon

  Stone Mountain, GA     —          397        1,791        21        402        1,807        2,209        483        2005        (l

195 & 197 Collins Boulevard

  Athens, GA     —          1,410        5,344        (1,742     989        4,023        5,012        2,520        2005        (l

1755 Enterprise Drive

  Buford, GA     1,529        712        2,118        (10     716        2,104        2,820        568        2006        (l

4555 Atwater Court

  Buford, GA     2,582        881        3,550        567        885        4,113        4,998        1,191        2006        (l

80 Liberty Industrial Parkway

  McDonough, GA     —          756        3,695        (1,333     467        2,651        3,118        743        2007        (l

596 Bonnie Valentine

  Pendergrass, GA     —          2,580        21,730        2,585        2,594        24,301        26,895        3,435        2007        (l

11415 Old Roswell Road

  Alpharetta, GA     —          2,403        1,912        491        2,428        2,378        4,806        476        2008        (l

Baltimore

                     

1820 Portal

  Baltimore, MD     —          884        4,891        1,025        899        5,901        6,800        1,839        1998        (l

9700 Martin Luther King Hwy

  Lanham, MD     —          700        1,920        377        700        2,297        2,997        530        2003        (l

9730 Martin Luther King Hwy

  Lanham, MD     —          500        955        418        500        1,373        1,873        452        2003        (l

4621 Boston Way

  Lanham, MD     —          1,100        3,070        298        1,100        3,368        4,468        839        2003        (l

4720 Boston Way

  Lanham, MD     —          1,200        2,174        497        1,200        2,671        3,871        640        2003        (l

22520 Randolph Drive

  Dulles, VA     7,745        3,200        8,187        (150     3,208        8,029        11,237        1,815        2004        (l

22630 Dulles Summit Court

  Dulles, VA     —          2,200        9,346        (20     2,206        9,320        11,526        2,117        2004        (l

4201 Forbes Boulevard

  Lanham, MD     —          356        1,823        341        375        2,145        2,520        573        2005        (l

4370-4383 Lottsford Vista Rd.

  Lanham, MD     —          279        1,358        220        296        1,561        1,857        429        2005        (l

4400 Lottsford Vista Rd.

  Lanham, MD     —          351        1,955        229        372        2,163        2,535        525        2005        (l

4420 Lottsford Vista Road

  Lanham, MD     —          539        2,196        241        568        2,408        2,976        643        2005        (l

11204 McCormick Road

  Hunt Valley, MD     —          1,017        3,132        51        1,038        3,162        4,200        932        2005        (l

11110 Pepper Road

  Hunt Valley, MD     —          918        2,529        376        938        2,885        3,823        836        2005        (l

11100-11120 Gilroy Road

  Hunt Valley, MD     —          901        1,455        (55     919        1,382        2,301        334        2005        (l

318 Clubhouse Lane

  Hunt Valley, MD     —          701        1,691        (47     718        1,627        2,345        387        2005        (l

10709 Gilroy Road

  Hunt Valley, MD     —          913        2,705        (113     913        2,592        3,505        889        2005        (l

10707 Gilroy Road

  Hunt Valley, MD     —          1,111        3,819        55        1,136        3,849        4,985        980        2005        (l

38 Loveton Circle

  Sparks, MD     —          1,648        2,151        (226     1,690        1,883        3,573        493        2005        (l

7120-7132 Ambassador Road

  Baltimore, MD     —          829        1,329        406        847        1,717        2,564        361        2005        (l

7142 Ambassador Road

  Hunt Valley, MD     —          924        2,876        2,374        942        5,232        6,174        830        2005        (l

7144-7162 Ambassador Road

  Baltimore, MD     —          979        1,672        433        1,000        2,084        3,084        759        2005        (l

7223-7249 Ambassador Road

  Woodlawn, MD     —          1,283        2,674        (40     1,311        2,606        3,917        877        2005        (l

7200 Rutherford Road

  Baltimore, MD     —          1,032        2,150        242        1,054        2,370        3,424        635        2005        (l

2700 Lord Baltimore Road

  Baltimore, MD     —          875        1,826        1,107        897        2,911        3,808        955        2005        (l

1225 Bengies Road

  Baltimore, MD     —          2,640        270        14,660        2,823        14,747        17,570        2,028        2008        (l

Central Pennsylvania

                     

1214-B Freedom Road

  Cranberry
Township, PA
    1,362        31        994        613        200        1,438        1,638        1,099        1994        (l

 

S-2


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

401 Russell Drive

  Middletown, PA     1,240        262        857        1,755        287        2,587        2,874        1,755        1994        (l

2700 Commerce Drive

  Middletown, PA     —          196        997        856        206        1,843        2,049        1,214        1994        (l

2701 Commerce Drive

  Middletown, PA     1,883        141        859        1,263        164        2,099        2,263        1,245        1994        (l

2780 Commerce Drive

  Middletown, PA     1,682        113        743        1,165        209        1,812        2,021        1,238        1994        (l

350 Old Silver Spring Road

  Mechanicsburg, PA     —          510        2,890        6,396        541        9,255        9,796        3,020        1997        (l

16522 Hunters Green Parkway

  Hagerstown, MD     12,962        1,390        13,104        3,893        1,863        16,524        18,387        3,480        2003        (l

18212 Shawley Drive

  Hagerstown, MD     6,748        1,000        5,847        1,198        1,016        7,029        8,045        1,699        2004        (l

37 Valleyview Business Park

  Jessup, PA     2,926        542        —          2,974        532        2,984        3,516        523        2004        (l

301 Railroad Avenue

  Shiremanstown, PA     —          1,181        4,447        2,412        1,328        6,712        8,040        1,870        2005        (l

431 Railroad Avenue

  Shiremanstown, PA     8,882        1,293        7,164        2,063        1,341        9,179        10,520        2,697        2005        (l

6951 Allentown Blvd

  Harrisburg, PA     —          585        3,176        124        601        3,284        3,885        811        2005        (l

320 Museum Road

  Washington, PA     —          201        1,819        (162     178        1,680        1,858        632        2005        (l

1351 Eisenhower Blvd., Bldg 1

  Harrisburg, PA     1,920        382        2,343        39        387        2,377        2,764        524        2006        (l

1351 Eisenhower Blvd., Bldg 2

  Harrisburg, PA     1,417        436        1,587        52        443        1,632        2,075        411        2006        (l

1490 Commerce Avenue

  Carlisle, PA     —          1,500        —          13,845        2,341        13,004        15,345        1,579        2008        (l

600 First Avenue

  Gouldsboro, PA     —          7,022        —          58,189        7,019        58,192        65,211        5,010        2008        (l

225 Cross Farm Lane

  York, PA     18,885        4,718        —          23,567        4,715        23,570        28,285        2,510        2008        (l

Chicago

                     

720-730 Landwehr Road

  Northbrook, IL     —          521        2,982        1,076        521        4,058        4,579        1,983        1994        (l

20W201 101st Street

  Lemont, IL     4,149        967        5,554        1,579        968        7,132        8,100        2,712        1994        (l

6750 South Sayre Avenue

  Bedford Park, IL     —          224        1,309        555        224        1,864        2,088        754        1994        (l

585 Slawin Court

  Mount Prospect, IL     —          611        3,505        1,644        525        5,235        5,760        2,387        1994        (l

2300 Windsor Court

  Addison, IL     3,930        688        3,943        1,255        696        5,190        5,886        2,325        1994        (l

3505 Thayer Court

  Aurora, IL     —          430        2,472        396        430        2,868        3,298        1,208        1994        (l

305-311 Era Drive

  Northbrook, IL     —          200        1,154        916        205        2,065        2,270        623        1994        (l

3150-3160 MacArthur Boulevard

  Northbrook, IL     —          429        2,518        135        429        2,653        3,082        1,143        1994        (l

365 North Avenue

  Carol Stream, IL     6,256        1,042        6,882        2,621        1,073        9,472        10,545        4,093        1994        (l

11241 Melrose Street

  Franklin Park, IL     —          332        1,931        42        208        2,097        2,305        1,163        1995        (l

11939 S Central Avenue

  Alsip, IL     —          1,208        6,843        2,633        1,305        9,379        10,684        3,079        1997        (l

405 East Shawmut

  LaGrange, IL     —          368        2,083        (1,046     81        1,324        1,405        830        1997        (l

1010-50 Sesame Street

  Bensenville, IL     —          979        5,546        2,782        1,048        8,259        9,307        2,698        1997        (l

2120-24 Roberts

  Broadview, IL     —          220        1,248        219        231        1,456        1,687        501        1998        (l

800 Business Center Drive

  Mount Prospect, IL     —          631        3,493        328        666        3,786        4,452        1,034        2000        (l

580 Slawin Court

  Mount Prospect, IL     —          233        1,292        (29     162        1,334        1,496        427        2000        (l

19W661 101st Street

  Lemont, IL     —          1,200        6,643        1,957        1,220        8,580        9,800        2,899        2001        (l

175 Wall Street

  Glendale Heights,
IL
    1,497        427        2,363        163        433        2,520        2,953        658        2002        (l

 

S-3


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

800-820 Thorndale Avenue

  Bensenville, IL     —          751        4,159        2,336        761        6,485        7,246        2,126        2002        (l

251 Airport Road

  North Aurora, IL     5,325        983        —          6,711        983        6,711        7,694        1,589        2002        (l

1661 Feehanville Drive

  Mount Prospect, IL     —          985        5,455        2,243        1,044        7,639        8,683        2,224        2004        (l

1850 Touhy & 1158 McCage Ave.

  Elk Grove Village, IL     —          1,500        4,842        (95     1,514        4,733        6,247        1,175        2004        (l

1088-1130 Thorndale Avenue

  Bensenville, IL     -        2,103        3,674        249        2,108        3,918        6,026        1,220        2005        (l

855-891 Busse Rd.

  Bensenville, IL     —          1,597        2,767        (72     1,601        2,691        4,292        821        2005        (l

1060-1074 W. Thorndale Ave

  Bensenville, IL     —          1,704        2,108        298        1,709        2,401        4,110        779        2005        (l

400 Crossroads Pkwy

  Bolingbrook, IL     5,658        1,178        9,453        927        1,181        10,377        11,558        2,508        2005        (l

7609 W. Industrial Drive

  Forest Park, IL     —          1,207        2,343        210        1,213        2,547        3,760        833        2005        (l

7801 W. Industrial Drive

  Forest Park, IL     —          1,215        3,020        240        1,220        3,255        4,475        866        2005        (l

825 E. 26th Street

  LaGrange, IL     —          1,547        2,078        2,639        1,617        4,647        6,264        1,580        2005        (l

725 Kimberly Drive

  Carol Stream, IL     —          793        1,395        203        801        1,590        2,391        396        2005        (l

17001 S. Vincennes

  Thornton, IL     —          497        504        24        513        512        1,025        249        2005        (l

1111 Davis Road

  Elgin, IL     —          998        1,859        910        1,046        2,721        3,767        1,219        2006        (l

2900 W. 166th Street

  Markham, IL     —          1,132        4,293        723        1,134        5,014        6,148        1,456        2007        (l

555 W. Algonquin Rd

  Arlington Heights, IL     1,912        574        741        2,053        579        2,789        3,368        524        2007        (l

7000 W. 60th Street

  Chicago, IL     —          609        932        237        667        1,111        1,778        575        2007        (l

9501 Nevada

  Franklin Park, IL     7,568        2,721        5,630        101        2,737        5,715        8,452        930        2008        (l

1501 Oakton Street

  Elk Grove Village, IL     —          3,369        6,121        139        3,482        6,147        9,629        1,224        2008        (l

16500 W. 103rd Street

  Woodridge, IL     2,785        744        2,458        405        760        2,848        3,608        526        2008        (l

Cincinnati

                     

9900-9970 Princeton

  Cincinnati, OH     —          545        3,088        1,443        566        4,510        5,076        1,700        1996        (l

2940 Highland Avenue

  Cincinnati, OH     —          1,717        9,730        (650     1,146        9,651        10,797        4,440        1996        (l

4700-4750 Creek Road

  Blue Ash, OH     —          1,080        6,118        1,126        1,109        7,215        8,324        2,593        1996        (l

901 Pleasant Valley Drive

  Springboro, OH     —          304        1,721        (406     190        1,429        1,619        609        1998        (l

4436 Mulhauser Road

  Hamilton, OH     3,813        630        —          5,081        630        5,081        5,711        1,146        2002        (l

4438 Mulhauser Road

  Hamilton, OH     4,946        779        —          6,738        779        6,738        7,517        1,840        2002        (l

420 Wards Corner Road

  Loveland, OH     —          600        1,083        695        606        1,772        2,378        487        2003        (l

422 Wards Corner Road

  Loveland, OH     —          600        1,811        (26     592        1,793        2,385        485        2003        (l

4663 Dues Drive

  Westchester, OH     —          858        2,273        962        875        3,218        4,093        2,104        2005        (l

9345 Princeton-Glendale Road

  Westchester, OH     1,553        818        1,648        357        840        1,983        2,823        732        2006        (l

9525 Glades Drive

  Westchester, OH     —          347        1,323        235        355        1,550        1,905        423        2007        (l

9776-9876 Windisch Road

  Westchester, OH     —          392        1,744        (1     394        1,741        2,135        348        2007        (l

9810-9822 Windisch Road

  Westchester, OH     —          395        2,541        27        397        2,566        2,963        399        2007        (l

9842-9862 Windisch Road

  Westchester, OH     —          506        3,148        68        508        3,214        3,722        454        2007        (l

9872-9898 Windisch Road

  Westchester, OH     —          546        3,039        62        548        3,099        3,647        507        2007        (l

9902-9922 Windisch Road

  Westchester, OH     —          623        4,003        208        627        4,207        4,834        782        2007        (l

 

S-4


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

Cleveland

                     

31311 Emerald Valley Pkwy.

  Glenwillow, OH     9,674        681        11,838        968        691        12,796        13,487        2,583        2006        (l

30333 Emerald Valley Pkwy.

  Glenwillow, OH     4,891        466        5,447        134        475        5,572        6,047        1,321        2006        (l

7800 Cochran Road

  Glenwillow, OH     7,004        972        7,033        288        991        7,302        8,293        1,692        2006        (l

7900 Cochran Road

  Glenwillow, OH     5,367        775        6,244        5        792        6,232        7,024        1,256        2006        (l

7905 Cochran Road

  Glenwillow, OH     —          920        6,174        270        921        6,443        7,364        1,340        2006        (l

30600 Carter Street

  Solon, OH     —          989        3,042        448        1,022        3,457        4,479        1,661        2006        (l

8181 Darrow Road

  Twinsburg, OH     7,473        2,478        6,791        1,922        2,496        8,696        11,192        1,713        2008        (l

Columbus

                     

3800 Lockbourne Industrial Pkwy

  Columbus, OH     —          1,045        6,421        (1,759     609        5,098        5,707        2,348        1996        (l

3880 Groveport Road

  Columbus, OH     —          1,955        12,154        (3,138     1,275        9,696        10,971        4,369        1996        (l

1819 North Walcutt Road

  Columbus, OH     —          637        4,590        (1,190     374        3,663        4,037        1,487        1997        (l

4115 Leap Road (d)

  Hillard, OH     —          756        4,297        1,636        756        5,933        6,689        2,069        1998        (l

3300 Lockbourne

  Columbus, OH     —          708        3,920        (2,050     162        2,416        2,578        1,513        1998        (l

1076 Pittsburgh Drive

  Delaware, OH     —          2,265        4,733        (49     2,184        4,765        6,949        1,220        2005        (l

6150 Huntly Road

  Columbus, OH     —          920        4,810        (1,733     591        3,406        3,997        857        2005        (l

4985 Frusta Drive

  Obetz, OH     —          318        837        255        326        1,084        1,410        392        2006        (l

4600 S. Hamilton Road

  Columbus, OH     —          681        5,941        (3,327     236        3,059        3,295        915        2006        (l

4311 Janitrol Road

  Groveport, OH     —          662        4,332        1,419        675        5,738        6,413        1,387        2007        (l

Dallas/Fort Worth

                     

2406-2416 Walnut Ridge

  Dallas, TX     —          178        1,006        606        172        1,618        1,790        459        1997        (l

2401-2419 Walnut Ridge

  Dallas, TX     —          148        839        397        142        1,242        1,384        313        1997        (l

900-906 Great Southwest Pkwy

  Arlington, TX     —          237        1,342        600        270        1,909        2,179        597        1997        (l

3000 West Commerce

  Dallas, TX     —          456        2,584        1,110        469        3,681        4,150        1,178        1997        (l

3030 Hansboro

  Dallas, TX     —          266        1,510        (615     87        1,074        1,161        646        1997        (l

405-407 113th

  Arlington, TX     —          181        1,026        581        185        1,603        1,788        494        1997        (l

816 111th Street

  Arlington, TX     872        251        1,421        132        258        1,546        1,804        558        1997        (l

7427 Dogwood Park

  Richland Hills, TX     —          96        532        569        102        1,095        1,197        501        1998        (l

7348-54 Tower Street

  Richland Hills, TX     —          88        489        225        94        708        802        238        1998        (l

7339-41 Tower Street

  Richland Hills, TX     —          98        541        172        104        707        811        216        1998        (l

7437-45 Tower Street

  Richland Hills, TX     —          102        563        170        108        727        835        220        1998        (l

7331-59 Airport Freeway

  Richland Hills, TX     1,758        354        1,958        321        372        2,261        2,633        761        1998        (l

7338-60 Dogwood Park

  Richland Hills, TX     —          106        587        123        112        704        816        226        1998        (l

7450-70 Dogwood Park

  Richland Hills, TX     —          106        584        146        112        724        836        250        1998        (l

7423-49 Airport Freeway

  Richland Hills, TX     1,485        293        1,621        309        308        1,915        2,223        631        1998        (l

7400 Whitehall Street

  Richland Hills, TX     —          109        603        61        115        658        773        214        1998        (l

1602-1654 Terre Colony

  Dallas, TX     1,867        458        2,596        810        468        3,396        3,864        941        2000        (l

 

S-5


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

2351-2355 Merritt Drive

  Garland, TX     —          101        574        87        92        670        762        212        2000        (l

701-735 North Plano Road

  Richardson, TX     —          696        3,944        (1,339     268        3,033        3,301        1,186        2000        (l

2220 Merritt Drive

  Garland, TX     —          352        1,993        852        316        2,881        3,197        981        2000        (l

2010 Merritt Drive

  Garland, TX     —          350        1,981        354        318        2,367        2,685        786        2000        (l

2363 Merritt Drive

  Garland, TX     —          73        412        72        47        510        557        213        2000        (l

2447 Merritt Drive

  Garland, TX     —          70        395        (107     23        335        358        137        2000        (l

2465-2475 Merritt Drive

  Garland, TX     —          91        514        35        71        569        640        176        2000        (l

2485-2505 Merritt Drive

  Garland, TX     —          431        2,440        851        426        3,296        3,722        880        2000        (l

2081 Hutton Drive—Bldg 1 (e)

  Carrolton, TX     —          448        2,540        (489     265        2,234        2,499        704        2001        (l

2110 Hutton Drive

  Carrolton, TX     —          374        2,117        (355     251        1,885        2,136        721        2001        (l

2025 McKenzie Drive

  Carrolton, TX     1,583        437        2,478        363        442        2,836        3,278        882        2001        (l

2019 McKenzie Drive

  Carrolton, TX     1,885        502        2,843        557        507        3,395        3,902        1,020        2001        (l

1420 Valwood Parkway—Bldg 1 (d)

  Carrolton, TX     —          460        2,608        (1,467     112        1,489        1,601        797        2001        (l

1620 Valwood Parkway (e)

  Carrolton, TX     —          1,089        6,173        (1,309     605        5,348        5,953        1,829        2001        (l

1505 Luna Road—Bldg II

  Carrolton, TX     —          167        948        (480     68        567        635        254        2001        (l

1625 West Crosby Road

  Carrolton, TX     —          617        3,498        (732     381        3,002        3,383        982        2001        (l

2029-2035 McKenzie Drive

  Carrolton, TX     1,586        306        1,870        234        306        2,104        2,410        543        2001        (l

1840 Hutton Drive (d)

  Carrolton, TX     —          811        4,597        (560     567        4,281        4,848        1,362        2001        (l

1420 Valwood Pkwy—Bldg II

  Carrolton, TX     —          373        2,116        300        366        2,423        2,789        616        2001        (l

2015 McKenzie Drive

  Carrolton, TX     2,629        510        2,891        397        516        3,282        3,798        942        2001        (l

2009 McKenzie Drive

  Carrolton, TX     2,460        476        2,699        379        481        3,073        3,554        890        2001        (l

1505 Luna Road—Bldg I

  Carrolton, TX     —          521        2,953        (1,965     129        1,380        1,509        735        2001        (l

2104 Hutton Drive

  Carrolton, TX     —          246        1,393        (422     130        1,087        1,217        372        2001        (l

900-1100 Avenue S

  Grand Prairie, TX     2,679        623        3,528        1,395        629        4,917        5,546        1,267        2002        (l

Plano Crossing (f)

  Plano, TX     9,699        1,961        11,112        940        1,981        12,032        14,013        2,989        2002        (l

7413A-C Dogwood Park

  Richland Hills, TX     —          110        623        249        111        871        982        197        2002        (l

7450 Tower Street

  Richland Hills, TX     —          36        204        103        36        307        343        80        2002        (l

7436 Tower Street

  Richland Hills, TX     —          57        324        195        58        518        576        98        2002        (l

7426 Tower Street

  Richland Hills, TX     —          76        429        240        76        669        745        152        2002        (l

7427-7429 Tower Street

  Richland Hills, TX     —          75        427        130        76        556        632        136        2002        (l

2840-2842 Handley Ederville Rd

  Richland Hills, TX     —          112        635        51        113        685        798        161        2002        (l

7451-7477 Airport Freeway

  Richland Hills, TX     1,347        256        1,453        309        259        1,759        2,018        433        2002        (l

7450 Whitehall Street

  Richland Hills, TX     —          104        591        414        105        1,004        1,109        210        2002        (l

3000 Wesley Way

  Richland Hills, TX     892        208        1,181        18        211        1,196        1,407        277        2002        (l

7451 Dogwood Park

  Richland Hills, TX     602        133        753        29        134        781        915        187        2002        (l

825-827 Avenue H (d)

  Arlington, TX     —          600        3,006        33        604        3,035        3,639        906        2004        (l

1013-31 Avenue M

  Grand Prairie, TX     -        300        1,504        227        302        1,729        2,031        402        2004        (l

1172-84 113th Street (d)

  Grand Prairie, TX     2,077        700        3,509        (94     704        3,411        4,115        866        2004        (l

 

S-6


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

1200-16 Avenue H (d)

  Arlington, TX     1,838        600        2,846        248        604        3,090        3,694        682        2004        (l

1322-66 N. Carrier Parkway (e)

  Grand Prairie, TX     —          1,000        5,012        131        1,006        5,137        6,143        1,262        2004        (l

2401-2407 Centennial Dr

  Arlington, TX     2,266        600        2,534        45        604        2,575        3,179        834        2004        (l

3111 West Commerce Street

  Dallas, TX     —          1,000        3,364        101        1,011        3,454        4,465        1,225        2004        (l

9150 North Royal Lane

  Irving, TX     —          818        3,767        (1,939     344        2,302        2,646        893        2005        (l

13800 Senlac Drive

  Farmers Ranch,
TX
    —          823        4,042        (89     825        3,951        4,776        837        2005        (l

801-831 S Great Southwest Pkwy (g)

  Grand Prairie, TX     —          2,581        16,556        (876     2,586        15,675        18,261        5,220        2005        (l

801-842 Heinz Way

  Grand Prairie, TX     2,979        599        3,327        349        601        3,674        4,275        1,206        2005        (l

901-937 Heinz Way

  Grand Prairie, TX     2,204        493        2,758        (14     481        2,756        3,237        1,008        2005        (l

3301 Century Circle

  Irving, TX     2,578        760        3,856        204        771        4,049        4,820        665        2007        (l

First Garland Dist Ctr.

  Garland, TX     —          1,912        —          14,941        1,947        14,906        16,853        1,887        2008        (l

Denver

                     

4785 Elati

  Denver, CO     —          173        981        169        175        1,148        1,323        365        1997        (l

4770 Fox Street

  Denver, CO     —          132        750        201        134        949        1,083        306        1997        (l

3871 Revere

  Denver, CO     1,300        361        2,047        282        368        2,322        2,690        786        1997        (l

4570 Ivy Street

  Denver, CO     1,087        219        1,239        256        220        1,494        1,714        511        1997        (l

5855 Stapleton Drive North

  Denver, CO     1,339        288        1,630        194        290        1,822        2,112        635        1997        (l

5885 Stapleton Drive North

  Denver, CO     1,811        376        2,129        350        380        2,475        2,855        902        1997        (l

5977-5995 North Broadway

  Denver, CO     1,397        268        1,518        306        271        1,821        2,092        605        1997        (l

5952-5978 North Broadway

  Denver, CO     2,397        414        2,346        831        422        3,169        3,591        1,096        1997        (l

4721 Ironton Street

  Denver, CO     —          232        1,313        24        236        1,333        1,569        441        1997        (l

East 47th Drive—A

  Denver, CO     —          441        2,689        (30     441        2,659        3,100        953        1997        (l

9500 West 49th Street—A

  Wheatridge, CO     —          283        1,625        71        287        1,692        1,979        620        1997        (l

9500 West 49th Street—B

  Wheatridge, CO     —          225        1,272        192        227        1,462        1,689        535        1997        (l

9500 West 49th Street—C

  Wheatridge, CO     —          600        3,409        114        601        3,522        4,123        1,254        1997        (l

9500 West 49th Street—D

  Wheatridge, CO     —          246        1,537        400        247        1,936        2,183        694        1997        (l

451-591 East 124th Avenue

  Littleton, CO     —          383        2,145        96        383        2,241        2,624        704        1997        (l

608 Garrison Street

  Lakewood, CO     —          265        1,501        419        269        1,916        2,185        677        1997        (l

610 Garrison Street

  Lakewood, CO     —          264        1,494        445        265        1,938        2,203        659        1997        (l

15000 West 6th Avenue

  Golden, CO     —          913        5,174        868        918        6,037        6,955        2,089        1997        (l

14998 West 6th Avenue Bldg E

  Golden, CO     —          565        3,199        342        570        3,536        4,106        1,256        1997        (l

14998 West 6th Avenue Bldg F

  Englewood, CO     —          269        1,525        104        273        1,625        1,898        561        1997        (l

12503 East Euclid Drive

  Denver, CO     —          1,208        6,905        364        1,036        7,441        8,477        2,710        1997        (l

6547 South Racine Circle

  Englewood, CO     2,958        739        4,241        328        739        4,569        5,308        1,657        1997        (l

11701 East 53rd Avenue

  Denver, CO     —          416        2,355        262        422        2,611        3,033        927        1997        (l

5401 Oswego Street

  Denver, CO     —          273        1,547        343        278        1,885        2,163        660        1997        (l

14818 West 6th Avenue Bldg A

  Golden, CO     —          468        2,799        327        468        3,126        3,594        1,174        1997        (l

 

S-7


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

14828 West 6th Avenue Bldg B

  Golden, CO     —          503        2,942        214        503        3,156        3,659        1,102        1997        (l

445 Bryant Street

  Denver, CO     7,196        1,829        10,219        2,848        1,829        13,067        14,896        4,219        1998        (l

3811 Joliet

  Denver, CO     —          735        4,166        448        752        4,597        5,349        1,566        1998        (l

12055 E 49th Ave/4955 Peoria

  Denver, CO     —          298        1,688        524        305        2,205        2,510        721        1998        (l

4940-4950 Paris

  Denver, CO     —          152        861        248        156        1,105        1,261        345        1998        (l

4970 Paris

  Denver, CO     —          95        537        144        97        679        776        228        1998        (l

7367 South Revere Parkway

  Englewood, CO     3,327        926        5,124        836        934        5,952        6,886        2,274        1998        (l

8200 East Park Meadows Drive (d)

  Lone Tree, CO     —          1,297        7,348        1,179        1,304        8,520        9,824        2,467        2000        (l

3250 Quentin (d)

  Aurora, CO     —          1,220        6,911        657        1,230        7,558        8,788        2,155        2000        (l

Highpoint Bus Ctr B

  Littleton, CO     —          739        —          3,408        781        3,366        4,147        807        2000        (l

1130 W. 124th Ave.

  Westminster, CO     —          441        —          3,889        441        3,889        4,330        1,388        2000        (l

1070 W. 124th Ave.

  Westminster, CO     —          374        —          2,792        374        2,792        3,166        680        2000        (l

1020 W. 124th Ave.

  Westminster, CO     —          374        —          2,784        374        2,784        3,158        708        2000        (l

Jeffco Bus Ctr Phase I

  Broomfield, CO     —          312        —          1,395        370        1,337        1,707        329        2001        (l

960 W. 124th Ave

  Westminster, CO     —          441        —          3,477        442        3,476        3,918        1,037        2001        (l

8820 W. 116th Street

  Broomfield, CO     —          338        1,918        330        372        2,214        2,586        490        2003        (l

8835 W. 116th Street

  Broomfield, CO     —          1,151        6,523        1,154        1,304        7,524        8,828        1,575        2003        (l

18150 E. 32nd Street

  Aurora, CO     1,959        563        3,188        305        572        3,484        4,056        861        2004        (l

3400 Fraser Street

  Aurora, CO     2,439        616        3,593        (168     620        3,421        4,041        716        2005        (l

7005 E. 46th Avenue Drive

  Denver, CO     1,479        512        2,025        95        517        2,115        2,632        495        2005        (l

4001 Salazar Way

  Frederick, CO     4,189        1,271        6,508        (88     1,276        6,415        7,691        1,364        2006        (l

5909-5915 N. Broadway

  Denver, CO     952        495        1,268        85        500        1,348        1,848        368        2006        (l

555 Corporate Circle

  Golden, CO     —          499        2,673        2,156        559        4,769        5,328        684        2006        (l

Detroit

                     

1731 Thorncroft

  Troy, MI     —          331        1,904        189        331        2,093        2,424        880        1994        (l

47461 Clipper

  Plymouth Township, MI     —          122        723        66        122        789        911        348        1994        (l

238 Executive Drive

  Troy, MI     —          52        173        514        100        639        739        566        1994        (l

449 Executive Drive

  Troy, MI     —          125        425        1,057        218        1,389        1,607        1,195        1994        (l

501 Executive Drive

  Troy, MI     —          71        236        600        129        778        907        582        1994        (l

451 Robbins Drive

  Troy, MI     —          96        448        889        192        1,241        1,433        1,105        1994        (l

1095 Crooks Road

  Troy, MI     —          331        1,017        2,271        360        3,259        3,619        2,057        1994        (l

1416 Meijer Drive

  Troy, MI     —          94        394        516        121        883        1,004        806        1994        (l

1624 Meijer Drive

  Troy, MI     —          236        1,406        1,055        373        2,324        2,697        1,852        1994        (l

1972 Meijer Drive

  Troy, MI     —          315        1,301        738        372        1,982        2,354        1,531        1994        (l

1621 Northwood Drive

  Troy, MI     —          85        351        1,014        215        1,235        1,450        1,158        1994        (l

1707 Northwood Drive

  Troy, MI     —          95        262        1,316        239        1,434        1,673        1,178        1994        (l

1788 Northwood Drive

  Troy, MI     —          50        196        483        103        626        729        560        1994        (l

1821 Northwood Drive

  Troy, MI     —          132        523        855        220        1,290        1,510        1,165        1994        (l

 

S-8


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

1826 Northwood Drive

  Troy, MI     —          55        208        472        103        632        735        550        1994        (l

1864 Northwood Drive

  Troy, MI     —          57        190        489        107        629        736        568        1994        (l

2277 Elliott Avenue

  Troy, MI     —          48        188        389        29        596        625        546        1994        (l

2451 Elliott Avenue

  Troy, MI     —          78        319        739        164        972        1,136        902        1994        (l

2730 Research Drive

  Rochester Hills, MI     —          903        4,215        1,402        903        5,617        6,520        3,937        1994        (l

2791 Research Drive

  Rochester Hills, MI     —          557        2,731        720        560        3,448        4,008        2,358        1994        (l

2871 Research Drive

  Rochester Hills, MI     —          324        1,487        570        327        2,054        2,381        1,346        1994        (l

3011 Research Drive

  Rochester Hills, MI     —          457        2,104        687        457        2,791        3,248        1,941        1994        (l

2870 Technology Drive

  Rochester Hills, MI     —          275        1,262        292        279        1,550        1,829        1,133        1994        (l

2900 Technology Drive

  Rochester Hills, MI     —          214        977        562        219        1,534        1,753        856        1994        (l

2930 Technology Drive

  Rochester Hills, MI     —          131        594        379        138        966        1,104        598        1994        (l

2950 Technology Drive

  Rochester Hills, MI     —          178        819        381        185        1,193        1,378        820        1994        (l

23014 Commerce Drive

  Farmington Hills, MI     —          39        203        216        56        402        458        302        1994        (l

23028 Commerce Drive

  Farmington Hills, MI     —          98        507        285        125        765        890        611        1994        (l

23035 Commerce Drive

  Farmington Hills, MI     —          71        355        278        93        611        704        487        1994        (l

23042 Commerce Drive

  Farmintgon Hills, MI     —          67        277        273        89        528        617        444        1994        (l

23065 Commerce Drive

  Farmington Hills, MI     —          71        408        285        93        671        764        477        1994        (l

23079 Commerce Drive

  Farmington Hills, MI     —          68        301        290        79        580        659        431        1994        (l

23093 Commerce Drive

  Farmington Hills, MI     —          211        1,024        805        295        1,745        2,040        1,423        1994        (l

23135 Commerce Drive

  Farmington Hills, MI     —          146        701        392        158        1,081        1,239        753        1994        (l

23163 Commerce Drive

  Farmington Hills, MI     —          111        513        341        138        827        965        605        1994        (l

23177 Commerce Drive

  Farmington Hills, MI     —          175        1,007        566        254        1,494        1,748        1,119        1994        (l

23206 Commerce Drive

  Farmington Hills, MI     —          125        531        367        137        886        1,023        629        1994        (l

23370 Commerce Drive

  Farmington Hills, MI     —          59        233        175        66        401        467        372        1994        (l

6515 Cobb Drive

  Sterling Heights, MI     —          305        1,753        242        305        1,995        2,300        830        1994        (l

1451 East Lincoln Avenue

  Madison Heights, MI     —          299        1,703        (476     148        1,378        1,526        773        1995        (l

4400 Purks Drive

  Auburn Hills, MI     —          602        3,410        3,300        612        6,700        7,312        2,494        1995        (l

32450 N Avis Drive

  Madison Heights, MI     —          281        1,590        529        286        2,114        2,400        779        1996        (l

12707 Eckles Road

  Plymouth Township, MI     —          255        1,445        243        267        1,676        1,943        617        1996        (l

9300-9328 Harrison Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          147        834        395        154        1,222        1,376        430        1996        (l

9330-9358 Harrison Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          81        456        271        85        723        808        259        1996        (l

28420-28448 Highland Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          143        809        268        149        1,071        1,220        370        1996        (l

28450-28478 Highland Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          81        461        602        85        1,059        1,144        359        1996        (l

28421-28449 Highland Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          109        617        491        114        1,103        1,217        393        1996        (l

28451-28479 Highland Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          107        608        380        112        983        1,095        325        1996        (l

28825-28909 Highland Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          70        395        314        73        706        779        279        1996        (l

28933-29017 Highland Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          112        634        255        117        884        1,001        295        1996        (l

 

S-9


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

28824-28908 Highland Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          134        760        441        140        1,195        1,335        373        1996        (l

28932-29016 Highland Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          123        694        453        128        1,142        1,270        343        1996        (l

9710-9734 Harrison Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          125        706        412        130        1,113        1,243        336        1996        (l

9740-9772 Harrison Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          132        749        311        138        1,054        1,192        354        1996        (l

9840-9868 Harrison Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          144        815        262        151        1,070        1,221        352        1996        (l

9800-9824 Harrison Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          117        664        343        123        1,001        1,124        325        1996        (l

29265-29285 Airport Dr

  Romulus, MI     —          140        794        299        147        1,086        1,233        412        1996        (l

29185-29225 Airport Dr

  Romulus, MI     —          140        792        502        146        1,288        1,434        400        1996        (l

29149-29165 Airport Dr

  Romulus, MI     —          216        1,225        248        226        1,463        1,689        550        1996        (l

29101-29115 Airport Dr

  Romulus, MI     —          130        738        257        136        989        1,125        372        1996        (l

29031-29045 Airport Dr

  Romulus, MI     —          124        704        130        130        828        958        317        1996        (l

29050-29062 Airport Dr

  Romulus, MI     —          127        718        230        133        942        1,075        337        1996        (l

29120-29134 Airport Dr

  Romulus, MI     —          161        912        268        169        1,172        1,341        423        1996        (l

29200-29214 Airport Dr

  Romulus, MI     —          170        963        292        178        1,247        1,425        458        1996        (l

9301-9339 Middlebelt Rd

  Romulus, MI     —          124        703        461        130        1,158        1,288        375        1996        (l

32975 Capitol Avenue

  Livonia, MI     —          135        748        (170     77        636        713        273        1998        (l

32920 Capitol Avenue

  Livonia, MI     —          76        422        (91     27        380        407        165        1998        (l

11923 Brookfield Avenue

  Livonia, MI     —          120        665        (350     32        403        435        258        1998        (l

11965 Brookfield Avenue

  Livonia, MI     —          120        665        (382     28        375        403        228        1998        (l

13405 Stark Road

  Livonia, MI     —          46        254        (3     30        267        297        104        1998        (l

1170 Chicago Road

  Troy, MI     —          249        1,380        (428     134        1,067        1,201        523        1998        (l

1200 Chicago Road

  Troy, MI     —          268        1,483        271        286        1,736        2,022        579        1998        (l

450 Robbins Drive

  Troy, MI     —          166        920        281        178        1,189        1,367        422        1998        (l

1230 Chicago Road

  Troy, MI     —          271        1,498        162        289        1,642        1,931        555        1998        (l

12886 Westmore Avenue

  Livonia, MI     —          190        1,050        (351     86        803        889        389        1998        (l

33025 Industrial Road

  Livonia, MI     —          80        442        (324     6        192        198        162        1998        (l

47711 Clipper Street

  Plymouth Township, MI     —          539        2,983        279        575        3,226        3,801        1,093        1998        (l

32975 Industrial Road

  Livonia, MI     —          160        887        (192     92        763        855        328        1998        (l

32985 Industrial Road

  Livonia, MI     —          137        761        (329     46        523        569        274        1998        (l

32995 Industrial Road

  Livonia, MI     —          160        887        (388     53        606        659        347        1998        (l

12874 Westmore Avenue

  Livonia, MI     —          137        761        (275     58        565        623        281        1998        (l

1775 Bellingham

  Troy, MI     —          344        1,902        365        367        2,244        2,611        752        1998        (l

1785 East Maple

  Troy, MI     —          92        507        140        98        641        739        201        1998        (l

1807 East Maple

  Troy, MI     —          321        1,775        (428     191        1,477        1,668        638        1998        (l

980 Chicago

  Troy, MI     —          206        1,141        224        220        1,351        1,571        443        1998        (l

1840 Enterprise Drive

  Rochester Hills, MI     —          573        3,170        (2,266     49        1,428        1,477        1,069        1998        (l

1885 Enterprise Drive

  Rochester Hills, MI     —          209        1,158        129        223        1,273        1,496        428        1998        (l

 

S-10


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period
12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

1935-55 Enterprise Drive

  Rochester Hills, MI     —          1,285        7,144        1,317        1,371        8,375        9,746        2,631        1998        (l

5500 Enterprise Court

  Warren, MI     —          675        3,737        586        721        4,277        4,998        1,410        1998        (l

750 Chicago Road

  Troy, MI     —          323        1,790        503        345        2,271        2,616        811        1998        (l

800 Chicago Road

  Troy, MI     —          283        1,567        366        302        1,914        2,216        636        1998        (l

850 Chicago Road

  Troy, MI     —          183        1,016        218        196        1,221        1,417        400        1998        (l

6833 Center Drive

  Sterling Heights, MI     —          467        2,583        204        493        2,761        3,254        954        1998        (l

1100 East Mandoline Road

  Madison Heights, MI     —          888        4,915        (1,273     332        4,198        4,530        1,920        1998        (l

1120 John A. Papalas Drive (e)

  Lincoln Park, MI     —          366        3,241        141        297        3,451        3,748        1,501        1998        (l

4872 S. Lapeer Road

  Lake Orion Twsp,
MI
    —          1,342        5,441        1,307        1,412        6,678        8,090        1,841        1999        (l

22701 Trolley Industrial

  Taylor, MI     —          795        —          7,326        849        7,272        8,121        2,145        1999        (l

1400 Allen Drive

  Troy, MI     —          209        1,154        231        212        1,382        1,594        406        2000        (l

1408 Allen Drive

  Troy, MI     —          151        834        133        153        965        1,118        302        2000        (l

1305 Stephenson Hwy

  Troy, MI     —          345        1,907        255        350        2,157        2,507        595        2000        (l

32505 Industrial Drive

  Madison Heights, MI     —          345        1,910        335        351        2,239        2,590        670        2000        (l

1799-1813 Northfield Drive (d)

  Rochester Hills, MI     —          481        2,665        256        490        2,912        3,402        831        2000        (l

28435 Automation Blvd

  Wixom, MI     —          621        —          3,742        628        3,735        4,363        711        2004        (l

32200 N Avis Drive

  Madison Heights, MI     —          503        3,367        (1,325     195        2,350        2,545        684        2005        (l

100 Kay Industrial Drive

  Rion Township, MI     —          677        2,018        273        685        2,283        2,968        633        2005        (l

32650 Capitol Avenue

  Livonia, MI     —          282        1,128        (500     167        743        910        148        2005        (l

11800 Sears Drive

  Livonia, MI     —          693        1,507        1,195        476        2,919        3,395        1,050        2005        (l

1099 Chicago Road

  Troy, MI     —          1,277        1,332        (1,470     303        836        1,139        594        2005        (l

42555 Merrill Road

  Sterling Heights, MI     —          1,080        2,300        3,487        1,090        5,777        6,867        1,294        2006        (l

200 Northpointe Drive

  Orion Township, MI     —          723        2,063        36        734        2,088        2,822        561        2006        (l

Houston

                     

2102-2314 Edwards Street

  Houston, TX     —          348        1,973        1,937        382        3,876        4,258        1,141        1997        (l

3351 Rauch St

  Houston, TX     —          272        1,541        553        278        2,088        2,366        656        1997        (l

3851 Yale St

  Houston, TX     2,049        413        2,343        359        425        2,690        3,115        925        1997        (l

3337-3347 Rauch Street

  Houston, TX     —          227        1,287        447        233        1,728        1,961        522        1997        (l

8505 N Loop East

  Houston, TX     1,723        439        2,489        638        449        3,117        3,566        1,001        1997        (l

4749-4799 Eastpark Dr

  Houston, TX     2,556        594        3,368        1,330        611        4,681        5,292        1,525        1997        (l

4851 Homestead Road

  Houston, TX     3,212        491        2,782        1,367        504        4,136        4,640        1,280        1997        (l

3365-3385 Rauch Street

  Houston, TX     1,707        284        1,611        699        290        2,304        2,594        781        1997        (l

5050 Campbell Road

  Houston, TX     1,700        461        2,610        448        470        3,049        3,519        1,073        1997        (l

4300 Pine Timbers

  Houston, TX     —          489        2,769        725        499        3,484        3,983        1,225        1997        (l

2500-2530 Fairway Park Drive

  Houston, TX     3,427        766        4,342        1,985        792        6,301        7,093        1,859        1997       
(l

 

S-11


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

6550 Longpointe

  Houston, TX     1,407        362        2,050        501        370        2,543        2,913        881        1997        (l

1815 Turning Basin Dr

  Houston, TX     1,911        487        2,761        708        531        3,425        3,956        1,181        1997        (l

1819 Turning Basin Dr

  Houston, TX     —          231        1,308        478        251        1,766        2,017        552        1997        (l

1805 Turning Basin Drive

  Houston, TX     2,246        564        3,197        888        616        4,033        4,649        1,391        1997        (l

9835A Genard Road

  Houston, TX     —          1,505        8,333        3,170        1,581        11,427        13,008        3,182        1999        (l

9835B Genard Road

  Houston, TX     —          245        1,357        646        256        1,992        2,248        628        1999        (l

11505 State Highway 225

  LaPorte City, TX     4,573        940        4,675        606        940        5,281        6,221        1,281        2005        (l

1500 E. Main Street

  Houston, TX     —          201        1,328        (26     204        1,299        1,503        577        2005        (l

700 Industrial Blvd

  Sugar Land, TX     3,471        608        3,679        336        617        4,006        4,623        764        2007        (l

7230-7238 Wynnwood

  Houston, TX     —          254        764        90        259        849        1,108        270        2007        (l

7240-7248 Wynnwood

  Houston, TX     —          271        726        61        276        782        1,058        257        2007        (l

7250-7260 Wynnwood

  Houston, TX     —          200        481        35        203        513        716        155        2007        (l

7967 Blankenship

  Houston, TX     —          307        1,166        220        307        1,386        1,693        180        2010        (l

8800 City Park Look East

  Houston, TX     24,242        3,717        19,237        1        3,717        19,237        22,954        646        2013        (l

6400 Long Point

  Houston, TX     —          188        898        (6     188        892        1,080        266        2007        (l

12705 S. Kirkwood, Ste 100-150

  Stafford, TX     —          154        626        81        155        706        861        146        2007        (l

12705 S. Kirkwood, Ste 200-220

  Stafford, TX     —          404        1,698        248        393        1,957        2,350        473        2007        (l

8850 Jameel

  Houston, TX     —          171        826        84        171        910        1,081        252        2007        (l

8800 Jameel

  Houston, TX     —          163        798        (142     124        695        819        172        2007        (l

8700 Jameel

  Houston, TX     —          170        1,020        (109     120        961        1,081        288        2007        (l

8600 Jameel

  Houston, TX     —          163        818        52        163        870        1,033        186        2007        (l

Indianapolis

                     

2900 N Shadeland Avenue

  Indianapolis, IN     —          2,057        13,565        3,478        2,057        17,043        19,100        6,687        1996        (l

1445 Brookville Way

  Indianapolis, IN     —          459        2,603        992        476        3,578        4,054        1,257        1996        (l

1440 Brookville Way

  Indianapolis, IN     —          665        3,770        894        685        4,644        5,329        1,929        1996        (l

1240 Brookville Way

  Indianapolis, IN     —          247        1,402        335        258        1,726        1,984        684        1996        (l

1345 Brookville Way

  Indianapolis, IN     —          586        3,321        686        601        3,992        4,593        1,565        1996        (l

1350 Brookville Way

  Indianapolis, IN     —          205        1,161        340        212        1,494        1,706        612        1996        (l

1341 Sadlier Circle E Dr

  Indianapolis, IN     —          131        743        215        136        953        1,089        370        1996        (l

1322-1438 Sadlier Circle E Dr

  Indianapolis, IN     —          145        822        293        152        1,108        1,260        409        1996        (l

1327-1441 Sadlier Circle E Dr

  Indianapolis, IN     —          218        1,234        459        225        1,686        1,911        569        1996        (l

1304 Sadlier Circle E Dr

  Indianapolis, IN     —          71        405        188        75        589        664        214        1996        (l

1402 Sadlier Circle E Dr

  Indianapolis, IN     —          165        934        369        171        1,297        1,468        479        1996        (l

1504 Sadlier Circle E Dr

  Indianapolis, IN     —          219        1,238        (128     115        1,214        1,329        629        1996        (l

1365 Sadlier Circle E Dr

  Indianapolis, IN     —          121        688        36        91        754        845        311        1996        (l

1352-1354 Sadlier Circle E Dr

  Indianapolis, IN     —          178        1,008        243        166        1,263        1,429        505        1996        (l

1335 Sadlier Circle E Dr

  Indianapolis, IN     —          81        460        310        85        766        851        363        1996        (l

1327 Sadlier Circle E Dr

  Indianapolis, IN     —          52        295        24        33        338        371        147        1996        (l

 

S-12


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period
12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

1425 Sadlier Circle E Dr

  Indianapolis, IN     —          21        117        37        23        152        175        59        1996        (l

6951 E 30th St

  Indianapolis, IN     —          256        1,449        194        265        1,634        1,899        631        1996        (l

6701 E 30th St

  Indianapolis, IN     —          78        443        84        82        523        605        194        1996        (l

6737 E 30th St

  Indianapolis, IN     1,839        385        2,181        189        398        2,357        2,755        927        1996        (l

6555 E 30th St

  Indianapolis, IN     —          484        4,760        1,314        484        6,074        6,558        2,336        1996        (l

8402-8440 E 33rd St

  Indianapolis, IN     —          222        1,260        578        230        1,830        2,060        702        1996        (l

8520-8630 E 33rd St

  Indianapolis, IN     —          326        1,848        266        281        2,159        2,440        837        1996        (l

8710-8768 E 33rd St

  Indianapolis, IN     —          175        993        473        180        1,461        1,641        558        1996        (l

3316-3346 N. Pagosa Court

  Indianapolis, IN     —          325        1,842        438        332        2,273        2,605        827        1996        (l

7901 West 21st St.

  Indianapolis, IN     —          1,048        6,027        164        1,048        6,191        7,239        2,270        1997        (l

1225 Brookville Way

  Indianapolis, IN     —          60        —          465        68        457        525        193        1997        (l

6751 E 30th St

  Indianapolis, IN     2,601        728        2,837        330        741        3,154        3,895        1,124        1997        (l

9200 East 146th Street

  Noblesville, IN     —          181        1,221        1,011        181        2,232        2,413        692        1998        (l

6575 East 30th Street

  Indianapolis, IN     1,835        118        —          2,088        128        2,078        2,206        716        1998        (l

6585 East 30th Street

  Indianapolis, IN     2,743        196        —          3,100        196        3,100        3,296        1,017        1998        (l

9210 E. 146th Street

  Noblesville, IN     —          66        684        168        54        864        918        281        1998        (l

5705-97 Park Plaza Ct.

  Indianapolis, IN     —          600        2,194        517        609        2,702        3,311        764        2003        (l

9319-9341 Castlegate Drive

  Indianapolis, IN     —          530        1,235        1,063        544        2,284        2,828        858        2003        (l

1133 Northwest L Street

  Richmond, IN     745        201        1,358        (51     208        1,300        1,508        438        2006        (l

14425 Bergen Blvd

  Noblesville, IN     —          647        —          3,861        743        3,765        4,508        680        2007        (l

Miami

                     

4700 NW 15th Ave.

  Ft. Lauderdale, FL     —          908        1,883        349        912        2,228        3,140        495        2007        (l

4710 NW 15th Ave.

  Ft. Lauderdale, FL     —          830        2,722        386        834        3,104        3,938        596        2007        (l

4720 NW 15th Ave.

  Ft. Lauderdale, FL     —          937        2,455        450        942        2,900        3,842        504        2007        (l

4740 NW 15th Ave.

  Ft. Lauderdale, FL     —          1,107        3,111        350        1,112        3,456        4,568        604        2007        (l

4750 NW 15th Ave.

  Ft. Lauderdale, FL     —          947        3,079        763        951        3,838        4,789        723        2007        (l

4800 NW 15th Ave.

  Ft. Lauderdale, FL     —          1,092        3,308        138        1,097        3,441        4,538        626        2007        (l

Medley Industrial Center

  Medley, FL     —          857        3,428        3,092        864        6,513        7,377        648        2007        (l

Pan American Business Park

  Medley, FL     —          2,521        —          637        828        2,330        3,158        121        2008        (l

Milwaukee

                     

N25 W23255 Paul Road

  Pewaukee, WI     1,897        569        3,270        (311     414        3,114        3,528        1,429        1994        (l

6523 N Sydney Place

  Glendale, WI     —          172        976        (16     80        1,052        1,132        538        1995        (l

5355 South Westridge Drive

  New Berlin, WI     5,482        1,630        7,058        (305     1,646        6,737        8,383        1,158        2004        (l

320-334 W. Vogel Avenue

  Milwaukee, WI     —          506        3,199        (168     508        3,029        3,537        1,055        2005        (l

4950 South 6th Avenue

  Milwaukee, WI     —          299        1,565        94        301        1,657        1,958        600        2005        (l

1711 Paramount Court

  Waukesha, WI     1,316        308        1,762        37        311        1,796        2,107        481        2005        (l

17005 W. Ryerson Road

  New Berlin, WI     —          403        3,647        (15     405        3,630        4,035        1,027        2005        (l

 

S-13


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

W140 N9059 Lilly Road

  Menomonee Falls, WI     —          343        1,153        156        366        1,286        1,652        413        2005        (l

200 W. Vogel Avenue-Bldg B

  Milwaukee, WI     —          301        2,150        —          302        2,149        2,451        759        2005        (l

4921 S. 2nd Street

  Milwaukee, WI     —          101        713        (233     58        523        581        214        2005        (l

1500 Peebles Drive

  Richland Center, WI     —          1,577        1,018        (289     1,528        778        2,306        601        2005        (l

16600 West Glendale Ave

  New Berlin, WI     2,338        704        1,923        677        715        2,589        3,304        873        2006        (l

2905 S. 160th Street

  New Berlin, WI     —          261        672        340        265        1,008        1,273        398        2007        (l

2855 S. 160th Street

  New Berlin, WI     —          221        628        223        225        847        1,072        239        2007        (l

2485 Commerce Drive

  New Berlin, WI     1,569        483        1,516        268        491        1,776        2,267        515        2007        (l

14518 Whittaker Way

  Menomonee Falls, WI     —          437        1,082        359        445        1,433        1,878        484        2007        (l

Rust-Oleum BTS

  Kenosha, WI     14,130        4,100        —          24,034        3,212        24,922        28,134        2,187        2008        (l

Menomonee Falls-Barry Land

  Menomonee Falls, WI     11,031        1,188        —          16,949        1,204        16,933        18,137        1,388        2008        (l

Minneapolis/St. Paul

                     

6201 West 111th Street

  Bloomington, MN     4,218        1,358        8,622        5,684        1,499        14,165        15,664        8,945        1994        (l

7251-7267 Washington Avenue

  Edina, MN     —          129        382        675        182        1,004        1,186        751        1994        (l

7301-7325 Washington Avenue

  Edina, MN     —          174        391        (34     193        338        531        80        1994        (l

7101 Winnetka Avenue North

  Brooklyn Park, MN     5,887        2,195        6,084        3,908        2,228        9,959        12,187        6,311        1994        (l

9901 West 74th Street

  Eden Prairie, MN     3,408        621        3,289        3,145        639        6,416        7,055        4,926        1994        (l

1030 Lone Oak Road

  Eagan, MN     2,614        456        2,703        618        456        3,321        3,777        1,351        1994        (l

1060 Lone Oak Road

  Eagan, MN     3,385        624        3,700        565        624        4,265        4,889        1,767        1994        (l

5400 Nathan Lane

  Plymouth, MN     2,962        749        4,461        921        757        5,374        6,131        2,307        1994        (l

6655 Wedgewood Road

  Maple Grove, MN     7,052        1,466        8,342        3,305        1,466        11,647        13,113        4,487        1994        (l

10120 W 76th Street

  Eden Prairie, MN     —          315        1,804        1,488        315        3,292        3,607        1,248        1995        (l

12155 Nicollet Ave.

  Burnsville, MN     —          286        —          1,741        288        1,739        2,027        703        1995        (l

4100 Peavey Road

  Chaska, MN     —          277        2,261        795        277        3,056        3,333        1,156        1996        (l

5205 Highway 169

  Plymouth, MN     —          446        2,525        658        578        3,051        3,629        1,258        1996        (l

7100-7198 Shady Oak Road

  Eden Prairie, MN     4,664        715        4,054        1,970        736        6,003        6,739        2,056        1996        (l

7500-7546 Washington Square

  Eden Prairie, MN     —          229        1,300        766        235        2,060        2,295        702        1996        (l

7550-7586 Washington Square

  Eden Prairie, MN     —          153        867        275        157        1,138        1,295        414        1996        (l

5240-5300 Valley Industrial Blvd S

  Shakopee, MN     —          362        2,049        843        371        2,883        3,254        965        1996        (l

500-530 Kasota Avenue SE

  Minneapolis, MN     —          415        2,354        1,042        434        3,377        3,811        1,137        1998        (l

2530-2570 Kasota Avenue

  St. Paul, MN     -        407        2,308        829        441        3,103        3,544        978        1998        (l

5775 12th Avenue

  Shakopee, MN     —          590        —          5,676        590        5,676        6,266        1,865        1998        (l

1157 Valley Park Drive

  Shakopee, MN     —          760        —          6,544        888        6,416        7,304        2,025        1999        (l

9600 West 76th Street

  Eden Prairie, MN     2,275        1,000        2,450        61        1,034        2,477        3,511        643        2004        (l

9700 West 76th Street

  Eden Prairie, MN     3,253        1,000        2,709        526        1,038        3,197        4,235        810        2004        (l

7600 69th Avenue

  Greenfield, MN     —          1,500        8,328        1,387        1,510        9,705        11,215        2,559        2004        (l

 

S-14


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

5017 Boone Avenue North

  New Hope, MN     2,068        1,000        1,599        (15     1,009        1,575        2,584        571        2005        (l

2300 West Highway 13

  Burnsville, MN     —          2,517        6,069        (3,331     1,296        3,959        5,255        2,528        2005        (l

1087 Park Place

  Shakopee, MN     —          1,195        4,891        (613     1,198        4,275        5,473        765        2005        (l

5391 12th Avenue SE

  Shakopee, MN     4,742        1,392        8,149        (342     1,395        7,804        9,199        1,433        2005        (l

4701 Valley Industrial Blvd S

  Shakopee, MN     —          1,296        7,157        598        1,299        7,752        9,051        2,481        2005        (l

316 Lake Hazeltine Drive

  Chaska, MN     —          714        944        (111     729        818        1,547        232        2006        (l

6455 City West Parkway

  Eden Prairie, MN     —          659        3,189        (407     665        2,776        3,441        562        2006        (l

1225 Highway 169 North

  Plymouth, MN     —          1,190        1,979        112        1,207        2,074        3,281        581        2006        (l

7102 Winnetka Avene North

  Brooklyn Park, MN     4,316        1,275        —          6,469        1,343        6,401        7,744        719        2007        (l

139 Eva Street

  St. Paul, MN     —          2,132        3,105        90        2,175        3,152        5,327        503        2008        (l

21900 Dodd Boulevard

  Lakeville, MN     9,766        2,289        7,952        (1     2,289        7,952        10,241        602        2009        (l

Nashville

                     

1621 Heil Quaker Boulevard

  Nashville, TN     2,377        413        2,383        1,845        430        4,211        4,641        2,066        1995        (l

3099 Barry Drive

  Portland, TN     —          418        2,368        (689     248        1,849        2,097        912        1996        (l

3150 Barry Drive

  Portland, TN     —          941        5,333        5,964        981        11,257        12,238        2,685        1996        (l

5599 Highway 31 West

  Portland, TN     —          564        3,196        (1,577     187        1,996        2,183        1,183        1996        (l

1931 Air Lane Drive

  Nashville, TN     2,452        489        2,785        269        493        3,050        3,543        1,065        1997        (l

4640 Cummings Park

  Nashville, TN     —          360        2,040        632        365        2,667        3,032        764        1999        (l

1740 River Hills Drive

  Nashville, TN     2,945        848        4,383        467        888        4,810        5,698        1,445        2005        (l

211 Ellery Court

  Nashville, TN     3,115        606        3,192        433        616        3,615        4,231        798        2007        (l

Rockdale BTS

  Gallatin, TN     17,389        1,778        —          24,267        1,778        24,267        26,045        1,992        2008        (l

Northern New Jersey

                     

14 World’s Fair Drive

  Franklin, NJ     —          483        2,735        602        503        3,317        3,820        1,165        1997        (l

12 World’s Fair Drive

  Franklin, NJ     —          572        3,240        1,120        593        4,339        4,932        1,470        1997        (l

22 World’s Fair Drive

  Franklin, NJ     —          364        2,064        639        375        2,692        3,067        1,022        1997        (l

26 World’s Fair Drive

  Franklin, NJ     —          361        2,048        623        377        2,655        3,032        951        1997        (l

24 World’s Fair Drive

  Franklin, NJ     —          347        1,968        486        362        2,439        2,801        940        1997        (l

20 World’s Fair Drive Lot 13

  Sumerset, NJ     —          9        —          2,554        691        1,872        2,563        493        1999        (l

45 Route 46

  Pine Brook, NJ     —          969        5,491        965        978        6,447        7,425        1,916        2000        (l

43 Route 46

  Pine Brook, NJ     —          474        2,686        420        479        3,101        3,580        822        2000        (l

39 Route 46

  Pine Brook, NJ     —          260        1,471        190        262        1,659        1,921        475        2000        (l

26 Chapin Road

  Pine Brook, NJ     4,891        956        5,415        769        965        6,175        7,140        1,785        2000        (l

30 Chapin Road

  Pine Brook, NJ     4,689        960        5,440        444        969        5,875        6,844        1,592        2000        (l

20 Hook Mountain Road

  Pine Brook, NJ     —          1,507        8,542        2,920        1,534        11,435        12,969        3,479        2000        (l

30 Hook Mountain Road

  Pine Brook, NJ     —          389        2,206        518        396        2,717        3,113        692        2000        (l

55 Route 46

  Pine Brook, NJ     —          396        2,244        (403     314        1,923        2,237        560        2000        (l

16 Chapin Rod

  Pine Brook, NJ     3,664        885        5,015        529        901        5,528        6,429        1,457        2000        (l

 

S-15


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

20 Chapin Road

  Pine Brook, NJ     4,688        1,134        6,426        665        1,154        7,071        8,225        1,997        2000        (l

Sayreville Lot 4

  Sayreville, NJ     3,515        944        —          4,598        944        4,598        5,542        1,108        2002        (l

Sayreville Lot 3

  Sayreville, NJ     —          996        —          5,392        996        5,392        6,388        1,010        2003        (l

309-319 Pierce Street

  Somerset, NJ     3,738        1,300        4,628        689        1,309        5,308        6,617        1,276        2004        (l

Philadelphia

                     

230-240 Welsh Pool Road

  Exton, PA     —          154        851        374        170        1,209        1,379        315        1998        (l

264 Welsh Pool Road

  Exton, PA     —          147        811        306        162        1,102        1,264        348        1998        (l

254 Welsh Pool Road

  Exton, PA     —          75        418        213        91        616        707        210        1998        (l

251 Welsh Pool Road

  Exton, PA     —          144        796        467        159        1,248        1,407        366        1998        (l

151-161 Philips Road

  Exton, PA     —          191        1,059        306        229        1,327        1,556        411        1998        (l

216 Philips Road

  Exton, PA     —          199        1,100        485        220        1,564        1,784        408        1998        (l

14 McFadden Road

  Palmer, PA     1,652        600        1,349        56        625        1,380        2,005        583        2004        (l

2801 Red Lion Road

  Philadelphia, PA     —          950        5,916        628        964        6,530        7,494        1,616        2005        (l

3240 S. 78th Street

  Philadelphia, PA     —          515        1,245        (256     423        1,081        1,504        375        2005        (l

200 Cascade Drive, Bldg. 1

  Allen Town, PA     18,820        2,133        17,562        893        2,769        17,819        20,588        4,084        2007        (l

200 Cascade Drive, Bldg. 2

  Allen Town, PA     2,487        310        2,268        190        316        2,452        2,768        417        2007        (l

6300 Bristol Pike

  Levittown, PA     —          1,074        2,642        (107     964        2,645        3,609        839        2008        (l

2455 Boulevard of Generals

  Norristown, PA     3,592        1,200        4,800        1,088        1,226        5,862        7,088        1,205        2008        (l

Phoenix

                     

1045 South Edward Drive

  Tempe, AZ     —          390        2,160        164        396        2,318        2,714        719        1999        (l

50 South 56th Street

  Chandler, AZ     —          1,206        3,218        360        1,252        3,532        4,784        850        2004        (l

4701 W. Jefferson

  Phoenix, AZ     2,650        926        2,195        443        929        2,635        3,564        978        2005        (l

7102 W. Roosevelt

  Phoenix, AZ     —          1,613        6,451        1,136        1,620        7,580        9,200        2,063        2006        (l

4137 West Adams Street

  Phoenix, AZ     —          990        2,661        255        1,038        2,868        3,906        626        2006        (l

245 W. Lodge

  Tempe, AZ     —          898        3,066        (1,891     362        1,711        2,073        451        2007        (l

1590 E Riverview Dr.

  Phoenix, AZ     —          1,293        5,950        396        1,292        6,347        7,639        723        2008        (l

14131 N. Rio Vista Dr.

  Peoria, AZ     —          2,563        9,388        1,798        2,563        11,186        13,749        1,936        2008        (l

8716 W. Ludlow Drive

  Peoria, AZ     —          2,709        10,970        1,236        2,709        12,206        14,915        1,547        2008        (l

3815 W. Washington St.

  Phoenix, AZ     3,975        1,675        4,514        149        1,719        4,619        6,338        522        2008        (l

690 91st Avenue

  Tolleson, AZ     7,497        1,904        6,805        2,646        1,923        9,432        11,355        1,503        2008        (l

Salt Lake City

                     

512 Lawndale Drive (i)

  Salt Lake City, UT     —          2,688        15,643        3,343        2,688        18,986        21,674        6,579        1997        (l

1270 West 2320 South

  West Valley, UT     —          138        784        256        143        1,035        1,178        384        1998        (l

1275 West 2240 South

  West Valley, UT     —          395        2,241        331        408        2,559        2,967        867        1998        (l

1288 West 2240 South

  West Valley, UT     —          119        672        111        123        779        902        266        1998        (l

2235 South 1300 West

  West Valley, UT     —          198        1,120        249        204        1,363        1,567        421        1998        (l

1293 West 2200 South

  West Valley, UT     —          158        896        118        163        1,009        1,172        335        1998        (l

 

S-16


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

1279 West 2200 South

  West Valley, UT     —          198        1,120        296        204        1,410        1,614        485        1998        (l

1272 West 2240 South

  West Valley, UT     —          336        1,905        387        347        2,281        2,628        741        1998        (l

1149 West 2240 South

  West Valley, UT     —          217        1,232        158        225        1,382        1,607        455        1998        (l

1142 West 2320 South

  West Valley, UT     —          217        1,232        73        225        1,297        1,522        449        1998        (l

1152 West 2240 South

  West Valley, UT     —          1,652        —          2,576        669        3,559        4,228        1,100        2000        (l

2323 South 900 W

  Salt Lake City, UT     —          886        2,995        218        898        3,201        4,099        1,254        2006        (l

1815-1957 South 4650 West

  Salt Lake City, UT     7,285        1,707        10,873        273        1,713        11,140        12,853        2,043        2006        (l

2100 Alexander Street

  West Valley, UT     1,152        376        1,670        (21     376        1,649        2,025        266        2007        (l

2064 Alexander Street

  West Valley, UT     2,125        864        2,771        129        869        2,895        3,764        580        2007        (l

Seattle

                     

1901 Raymond Ave SW

  Renton, WA     1,833        4,458        2,659        633        4,594        3,156        7,750        473        2008        (l

19014 64th Avenue South

  Kent, WA     3,179        1,990        3,979        258        2,042        4,186        6,228        707        2008        (l

18640 68th Ave. South

  Kent, WA     732        1,218        1,950        348        1,258        2,258        3,516        407        2008        (l

Puget Sound Terminal 7

  Seattle, WA     —          9,139        5,881        1,069        9,340        6,748        16,088        393        2008        (l

Southern California

                     

100 West Sinclair

  Riverside, CA     —          4,894        3,481        (4,561     1,819        1,995        3,814        872        2007        (l

14050 Day Street

  Moreno Valley, CA     3,582        2,538        2,538        291        2,565        2,801        5,366        445        2008        (l

12925 Marlay Avenue

  Fontana, CA     9,869        6,072        7,891        711        6,090        8,584        14,674        1,707        2008        (l

1944 Vista Bella Way

  Rancho Domingue, CA     —          1,746        3,148        730        1,822        3,802        5,624        1,072        2005        (l

2000 Vista Bella Way

  Rancho Domingue, CA     1,414        817        1,673        301        853        1,938        2,791        488        2005        (l

2835 East Ana Street

  Rancho Domingue, CA     3,015        1,682        2,750        (227     1,772        2,433        4,205        602        2005        (l

665 N. Baldwin Park Blvd.

  City of Industry, CA     4,585        2,124        5,219        1,587        2,143        6,787        8,930        1,451        2006        (l

27801 Avenue Scott

  Santa Clarita, CA     —          2,890        7,020        599        2,902        7,607        10,509        1,503        2006        (l

2610 & 2660 Columbia St

  Torrance, CA     4,715        3,008        5,826        181        3,031        5,984        9,015        1,231        2006        (l

433 Alaska Avenue

  Torrance, CA     —          681        168        13        684        178        862        66        2006        (l

4020 S. Compton Ave

  Los Angeles, CA     —          3,800        7,330        71        3,825        7,376        11,201        1,195        2006        (l

21730-21748 Marilla St.

  Chatsworth, CA     3,154        2,585        3,210        192        2,608        3,379        5,987        718        2007        (l

8015 Paramount

  Pico Rivera, CA     —          3,616        3,902        61        3,657        3,922        7,579        855        2007        (l

3365 E. Slauson

  Vernon, CA     —          2,367        3,243        40        2,396        3,254        5,650        748        2007        (l

3015 East Ana

  Rancho Domingue, CA     —          19,678        9,321        7,490        20,144        16,345        36,489        3,110        2007        (l

19067 Reyes Ave

  Rancho Domingue, CA     —          9,281        3,920        202        9,381        4,022        13,403        1,057        2007        (l

1250 Rancho Conejo Blvd.

  Thousand Oaks, CA     —          1,435        779        98        1,441        871        2,312        215        2007        (l

1260 Rancho Conejo Blvd.

  Thousand Oaks, CA     —          1,353        722        (860     675        540        1,215        166        2007        (l

1270 Rancho Conejo Blvd.

  Thousand Oaks, CA     —          1,224        716        (20     1,229        691        1,920        164        2007        (l

1280 Rancho Conejo Blvd.

  Thousand Oaks, CA     3,062        2,043        3,408        (266     2,051        3,134        5,185        399        2007        (l

1290 Rancho Conejo Blvd

  Thousand Oaks, CA     2,639        1,754        2,949        (230     1,761        2,712        4,473        349        2007        (l

18201-18291 Santa Fe

  Rancho Domingue, CA     10,461        6,720        —          8,949        6,897        8,772        15,669        892        2008        (l

 

S-17


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                       (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                         
                                                         
                                                         
                 (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                       Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location     (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)     Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
          (Dollars in thousands)              

1011 Rancho Conejo

    Thousand Oaks, CA        5,784        7,717        2,518        (186     7,752        2,296        10,048        556        2008        (l

2300 Corporate Center Drive

    Thousand Oaks, CA        —          6,506        4,885        (5,725     3,236        2,430        5,666        541        2008        (l

20700 Denker Avenue

    Rancho Domingue, CA        5,614        5,767        2,538        1,456        5,964        3,798        9,762        864        2008        (l

18408 Laurel Park Road

    Rancho Domingue, CA        —          2,850        2,850        643        2,874        3,469        6,343        470        2008        (l

19021 S. Reyes Ave.

    Rancho Domingue, CA        —          8,183        7,501        733        8,545        7,872        16,417        821        2008        (l

16275 Technology Drive

    San Diego, CA        —          2,848        8,641        (198     2,859        8,432        11,291        1,660        2005        (l

6305 El Camino Real

    Carlsbad, CA        —          1,590        6,360        7,563        1,590        13,923        15,513        2,073        2006        (l

2325 Camino Vida Roble

    Carlsbad, CA        2,026        1,441        1,239        464        1,446        1,698        3,144        353        2006        (l

2335 Camino Vida Roble

    Carlsbad, CA        1,126        817        762        133        821        891        1,712        232        2006        (l

2345 Camino Vida Roble

    Carlsbad, CA        795        562        456        87        565        540        1,105        157        2006        (l

2355 Camino Vida Roble

    Carlsbad, CA        582        481        365        57        483        420        903        120        2006        (l

2365 Camino Vida Roble

    Carlsbad, CA        1,226        1,098        630        3        1,102        629        1,731        199        2006        (l

2375 Camino Vida Roble

    Carlsbad, CA        1,531        1,210        874        199        1,214        1,069        2,283        317        2006        (l

6451 El Camino Real

    Carlsbad, CA        —          2,885        1,931        507        2,895        2,428        5,323        573        2006        (l

8572 Spectrum Lane

    San Diego, CA        2,261        806        3,225        429        807        3,653        4,460        556        2007        (l

13100 Gregg Street

    Poway, CA        —          1,040        4,160        474        1,073        4,601        5,674        948        2007        (l

Southern New Jersey

                     

8 Springdale Road

    Cherry Hill, NJ        —          258        1,436        782        258        2,218        2,476        764        1998        (l

111 Whittendale Drive

    Morrestown, NJ        1,841        522        2,916        195        522        3,111        3,633        891        2000        (l

7851 Airport Highway

    Pennsauken, NJ        —          160        508        381        162        887        1,049        194        2003        (l

103 Central

    Mt. Laurel, NJ        —          610        1,847        1,027        619        2,865        3,484        710        2003        (l

7890 Airport Hwy/7015 Central

    Pennsauken, NJ        1,295        300        989        511        425        1,375        1,800        619        2006        (l

600 Creek Road

    Delanco, NJ        —          2,125        6,504        (1,905     1,557        5,167        6,724        2,045        2007        (l

1070 Thomas Busch Mem Hwy

    Pennsauken, NJ        2,685        1,054        2,278        84        1,084        2,332        3,416        502        2007        (l

St. Louis

                     

8921-8971 Fost Avenue

    Hazelwood, MO        —          431        2,479        888        431        3,367        3,798        1,284        1994        (l

9043-9083 Frost Avenue

    Hazelwood, MO        —          319        1,838        2,243        319        4,081        4,400        1,181        1994        (l

10431-10449 Midwest Industrial Blvd

    Olivette, MO        1,335        237        1,360        403        237        1,763        2,000        720        1994        (l

10751 Midwest Industrial Boulevard

    Olivette, MO        —          193        1,119        259        194        1,377        1,571        526        1994        (l

6951 N Hanley (d)

    Hazelwood, MO        —          405        2,295        2,001        419        4,282        4,701        1,416        1996        (l

1067 Warson-Bldg A

    St. Louis, MO        —          246        1,359        881        251        2,235        2,486        524        2002        (l

1067 Warson-Bldg B

    St. Louis, MO        —          380        2,103        1,889        388        3,984        4,372        993        2002        (l

1067 Warson-Bldg C

    St. Louis, MO        —          303        1,680        1,476        310        3,149        3,459        839        2002        (l

1067 Warson-Bldg D

    St. Louis, MO        —          353        1,952        1,024        360        2,969        3,329        916        2002        (l

 

S-18


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

6821-6857 Hazelwood Avenue

  Berkeley, MO     4,836        985        6,205        678        985        6,883        7,868        1,755        2003        (l

13701 Rider Trail North

  Earth City, MO     —          800        2,099        714        804        2,809        3,613        720        2003        (l

1908-2000 Innerbelt (d)

  Overland, MO     7,980        1,590        9,026        966        1,591        9,991        11,582        2,878        2004        (l

9060 Latty Avenue

  Berkeley, MO     —          687        1,947        (223     694        1,717        2,411        1,070        2006        (l

21-25 Gateway Commerce Center

  Edwardsville, IL     23,091        1,874        31,958        191        1,928        32,095        34,023        4,883        2006        (l

6647 Romiss Court

  St. Louis, MO     —          230        681        72        241        742        983        193        2008        (l

Tampa

                     

5313 Johns Road

  Tampa, FL     —          204        1,159        178        257        1,284        1,541        443        1997        (l

5525 Johns Road

  Tampa, FL     —          192        1,086        424        200        1,502        1,702        635        1997        (l

5709 Johns Road

  Tampa, FL     —          192        1,086        163        200        1,241        1,441        444        1997        (l

5711 Johns Road

  Tampa, FL     —          243        1,376        176        255        1,540        1,795        560        1997        (l

5453 W Waters Avenue

  Tampa, FL     —          71        402        134        82        525        607        182        1997        (l

5455 W Waters Avenue

  Tampa, FL     —          307        1,742        806        326        2,529        2,855        822        1997        (l

5553 W Waters Avenue

  Tampa, FL     —          307        1,742        447        326        2,170        2,496        784        1997        (l

5501 W Waters Avenue

  Tampa, FL     —          215        871        301        242        1,145        1,387        397        1997        (l

5503 W Waters Avenue

  Tampa, FL     —          98        402        289        110        679        789        241        1997        (l

5555 W Waters Avenue

  Tampa, FL     —          213        1,206        237        221        1,435        1,656        546        1997        (l

5557 W Waters Avenue

  Tampa, FL     —          59        335        44        62        376        438        130        1997        (l

5463 W Waters Avenue

  Tampa, FL     —          497        2,751        667        560        3,355        3,915        1,163        1998        (l

5461 W Waters

  Tampa, FL     —          261        —          1,567        265        1,563        1,828        585        1998        (l

5481 W. Waters Avenue

  Tampa, FL     —          558        —          2,497        561        2,494        3,055        778        1999        (l

4515-4519 George Road

  Tampa, FL     2,528        633        3,587        767        640        4,347        4,987        1,162        2001        (l

6089 Johns Road

  Tampa, FL     910        180        987        122        186        1,103        1,289        306        2004        (l

6091 Johns Road

  Tampa, FL     676        140        730        98        144        824        968        247        2004        (l

6103 Johns Road

  Tampa, FL     1,108        220        1,160        146        226        1,300        1,526        389        2004        (l

6201 Johns Road

  Tampa, FL     1,029        200        1,107        168        205        1,270        1,475        393        2004        (l

6203 Johns Road

  Tampa, FL     1,286        300        1,460        116        311        1,565        1,876        569        2004        (l

6205 Johns Road

  Tampa, FL     1,280        270        1,363        120        278        1,475        1,753        333        2004        (l

6101 Johns Road

  Tampa, FL     805        210        833        127        216        954        1,170        348        2004        (l

4908 Tampa West Blvd

  Tampa, FL     —          2,622        8,643        (820     2,635        7,810        10,445        1,821        2005        (l

7201-7245 Bryan Dairy Road (d)

  Largo, FL     —          1,895        5,408        (1,434     1,365        4,504        5,869        878        2006        (l

11701 Belcher Road South

  Largo, FL     —          1,657        2,768        (1,516     852        2,057        2,909        624        2006        (l

4900-4914 Creekside Drive (h)

  Clearwater, FL     —          3,702        7,338        (3,046     2,221        5,773        7,994        1,913        2006        (l

12345 Starkey Road

  Largo, FL     —          898        2,078        (462     599        1,915        2,514        594        2006        (l

Toronto

                     

114 Packham Rd

  Stratford, ON     —          1,000        3,526        527        1,012        4,041        5,053        1,624        2007        (l

 

S-19


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

                     (c)
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition or
Completion
and Valuation
Provision
                                     
                                                       
                                                       
                                                       
               (b)
Initial Cost
      Gross Amount Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/11
                   
                     Accumulated
Depreciation
12/31/2011
    Year
Acquired/
Constructed
    Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 
    Location   (a)                         Building and              

Building Address

  (City/State)   Encumbrances      Land     Buildings       Land     Improvements     Total        
        (Dollars in thousands)              

Other

                     

5050 Kendrick Court

  Grand Rapids, MI     —          1,721        11,433        (2,219     988        9,947        10,935        6,764        1994        (l

2250 Delaware Ave.

  Des Moines, IA     —          277        1,609        (63     173        1,650        1,823        711        1998        (l

9601A Dessau Road

  Austin, TX     1,209        255        —          1,782        366        1,671        2,037        505        1999        (l

9601C Dessau Road

  Austin, TX     1,443        248        —          2,185        355        2,078        2,433        997        1999        (l

9601B Dessau Road

  Austin, TX     1,246        248        —          1,852        355        1,745        2,100        588        2000        (l

6266 Hurt Road

  Horn Lake, MS     —          427        —          4,013        387        4,053        4,440        614        2004        (l

6301 Hazeltine National Drive

  Orlando, FL     3,959        909        4,613        286        920        4,888        5,808        1,327        2005        (l

12626 Silicon Drive

  San Antonio, TX     3,132        768        3,448        158        779        3,595        4,374        1,084        2005        (l

3100 Pinson Valley Parkway

  Birmingham, AL     —          303        742        (215     225        605        830        206        2005        (l

10330 I Street

  Omaha, NE     —          1,808        8,340        (1,457     1,619        7,072        8,691        2,147        2006        (l

3200 Pond Station

  Jefferson County, KY     —          2,074        —          9,681        2,120        9,635        11,755        1,136        2007        (l

Ozburn Hessey Logistics

  Winchester, VA     8,036        2,320        —          10,855        2,401        10,774        13,175        1,228        2007        (l

Pure Fishing BTS

  Kansas City, MO     11,856        4,152        —          13,605        4,228        13,529        17,757        1,088        2008        (l

3730 Wheeler Avenue

  Fort Smith, AR     —          720        2,800        (561     589        2,370        2,959        554        2006        (l

600 Greene Drive

  Greenville, KY     —          294        8,570        3        296        8,571        8,867        2,924        2008        (l

Redevelopments / Developements / Developable Land

                     

Redevelopments / Developments / Developable Land (j)

      —          132,787        1,154        (954 )(m)      118,854        14,133        132,987        1,221       
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

    $ 689,895      $ 687,614      $ 1,799,497      $ 600,160      $ 654,951 (k)    $ 2,432,314 (k)    $ 3,087,265      $ 695,931        (k  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

NOTES:

(a) See description of encumbrances in Note 6 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(b) Initial cost for each respective property is tangible purchase price allocated in accordance with FASB’s guidance on business combinations.
(c) Improvements are net of write-off of fully depreciated assets and impairment of real estate.
(d) Comprised of two properties.
(e) Comprised of three properties.
(f) Comprised of four properties.
(g) Comprised of five properties.
(h) Comprised of eight properties.

 

S-20


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

(i) Comprised of 27 properties.
(j) These properties represent developable land and redevelopments that have not been placed in service and land parcels for which we receive ground lease income.
(k)

 

     Amounts
Included
in Real Estate
Held for Sale
    Amounts Within
Net Investment
in Real Estate
    Gross Amount
Carried At
Close of Period
December 31, 2011
 

Land

   $ 16,880      $ 638,071      $ 654,951   

Buildings & Improvements

     106,069        2,326,245        2,432,314   

Accumulated Depreciation

     (37,202     (658,729     (695,931
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal

     85,747        2,305,587        2,391,334   

Construction in Progress

     5        27,780        27,785   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Investment in Real Estate

     85,752        2,333,367        2,419,119   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Leasing Commissions, Net, Deferred Leasing Intangibles, Net and Deferred Rent Receivable, Net

     5,907       
  

 

 

     

Total at December 31, 2011

   $ 91,659       
  

 

 

     

 

(l) Depreciation is computed based upon the following estimated lives:

 

Buildings and Improvements and Land Improvements

     3 to 50 years   

Tenant Improvements, Leasehold Improvements

     Life of lease   

 

(m) Includes foreign currency translation adjustments.

At December 31, 2011, the aggregate cost of land and buildings and equipment for federal income tax purpose was approximately $3.1 billion (excluding construction in progress).

 

S-21


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III:

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

 

The changes in total real estate assets, including real estate held for sale, for the three years ended December 31, 2011 are as follows:

 

     2011     2010     2009  
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Balance, Beginning of Year

   $ 3,140,649      $ 3,351,626      $ 3,406,729   

Acquisition of Real Estate Assets

     22,953        17,595        208   

Construction Costs and Improvements

     72,822        49,881        54,650   

Disposition of Real Estate Assets

     (91,312     (50,929     (73,015

Impairment of Real Estate

     2,661        (194,552     (6,934

Write-off of Fully Depreciated Assets

     (32,723     (32,972     (30,012
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, End of Year

   $ 3,115,050      $ 3,140,649      $ 3,351,626   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The changes in accumulated depreciation, including accumulated depreciation for real estate held for sale, for the three years ended December 31, 2011 are as follows:

 

     2011     2010     2009  

Balance, Beginning of Year

   $ 663,310      $ 597,461      $ 524,865   

Depreciation for Year

     95,931        104,175        112,241   

Disposition of Assets

     (30,587     (5,354     (9,633

Write-off of Fully Depreciated Assets

     (32,723     (32,972     (30,012
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, End of Year

   $ 695,931      $ 663,310      $ 597,461   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

S-22


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.
By:   /s/    BRUCE W. DUNCAN        
  Bruce W. Duncan
  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: February 28, 2012

 

By:   /s/    SCOTT A. MUSIL        
  Scott A. Musil
  Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: February 28, 2012

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

  

Title

 

Date

/s/    W. EDWIN TYLER        

W. Edwin Tyler

  

Chairman of the Board of Directors

  February 28, 2012

/s/    BRUCE W. DUNCAN        

Bruce W. Duncan

  

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

  February 28, 2012

/s/    MATTHEW DOMINSKI        

Matthew Dominski

  

Director

  February 28, 2012

/s/    H. PATRICK HACKETT, JR.        

H. Patrick Hackett, Jr.

  

Director

  February 28, 2012

/s/    KEVIN W. LYNCH        

Kevin W. Lynch

  

Director

  February 28, 2012

/s/    JOHN E. RAU        

John E. Rau

  

Director

  February 28, 2012

/s/    L. PETER SHARPE        

L. Peter Sharpe

  

Director

  February 28, 2012

/s/    ROBERT J. SLATER        

Robert J. Slater

  

Director

  February 28, 2012

 

S-23