Annual Statements Open main menu

FNB CORP/PA/ - Quarter Report: 2019 March (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents                             

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 
 
FORM 10-Q
 
 
 
(Mark One)
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2019
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number 001-31940
 
 
 
F.N.B. CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 
 
Pennsylvania
 
25-1255406
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
One North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Pittsburgh, PA
 
15212
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 800-555-5455

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer
Accelerated Filer
 
 
 
 
Non-accelerated Filer
Smaller reporting company
 
 
 
 
 
 
Emerging Growth Company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
 
Trading Symbol(s)
 
Name of Exchange on which Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
 
FNB
 
New York Stock Exchange
 
 
 
 
 
Depositary Shares each representing a 1/40th interest in a
share of Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series E, par value $0.01 per share
 
FNBPrE
 
New York Stock Exchange
  
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
Outstanding at

April 30, 2019
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value
324,748,696

Shares



Table of Contents                             

F.N.B. CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
March 31, 2019
INDEX
 
 
PAGE
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
Financial Statements
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
Item 1A.
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
Item 5.
 
 
 
Item 6.
 
 
 
 


2

Table of Contents                             

Glossary of Acronyms and Terms
AFS
Available for sale
ALCO
Asset/Liability Committee
AOCI
Accumulated other comprehensive income
ASC
Accounting Standards Codification
ASU
Accounting Standards Update
BOLI
Bank owned life insurance
Basel III
Basel III Capital Rules
CFPB
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
EVE
Economic value of equity
FDIC
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FHLB
Federal Home Loan Bank
FNB
F.N.B. Corporation
FNBPA
First National Bank of Pennsylvania
FRB
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
FTE
Fully taxable equivalent
FVO
Fair value option
GAAP
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
HTM
Held to maturity
IRLC
Interest rate lock commitments
LCR
Liquidity Coverage Ratio
LIBOR
London Inter-bank Offered Rate
MCH
Months of Cash on Hand
MD&A
Management's Discussion and Analysis
MSR
Mortgage servicing rights
OCC
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
OREO
Other real estate owned
OTTI
Other-than-temporary impairment
Regency
Regency Finance Company    
SBA
Small Business Administration
SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission
TCJA
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
TDR
Troubled debt restructuring
TPS
Trust preferred securities
UST
U.S. Department of the Treasury
YDKN
Yadkin Financial Corporation


3

Table of Contents                             

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Dollars in millions, except share and per share data
 
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
$
425

 
$
451

Interest bearing deposits with banks
72

 
37

Cash and Cash Equivalents
497

 
488

Debt securities available for sale
3,403

 
3,341

Debt securities held to maturity (fair value of $3,139 and $3,155)
3,171

 
3,254

Loans held for sale (includes $25 and $14 measured at fair value) (1)
37

 
22

Loans and leases, net of unearned income of $0 and $3
22,620

 
22,153

Allowance for credit losses
(186
)
 
(180
)
Net Loans and Leases
22,434

 
21,973

Premises and equipment, net
329

 
330

Goodwill
2,255

 
2,255

Core deposit and other intangible assets, net
75

 
79

Bank owned life insurance
538

 
537

Other assets
956

 
823

Total Assets
$
33,695

 
$
33,102

Liabilities
 
 
 
Deposits:
 
 
 
Non-interest-bearing demand
$
6,124

 
$
6,000

Interest-bearing demand
9,743

 
9,660

Savings
2,523

 
2,526

Certificates and other time deposits
5,492

 
5,269

Total Deposits
23,882

 
23,455

Short-term borrowings
4,111

 
4,129

Long-term borrowings
673

 
627

Other liabilities
349

 
283

Total Liabilities
29,015

 
28,494

Stockholders’ Equity
 
 
 
Preferred stock - $0.01 par value; liquidation preference of $1,000 per share
 
 
 
Authorized – 20,000,000 shares
 
 
 
Issued – 110,877 shares
107

 
107

Common stock - $0.01 par value
 
 
 
Authorized – 500,000,000 shares
 
 
 
Issued – 326,450,880 and 326,120,832 shares
3

 
3

Additional paid-in capital
4,052

 
4,049

Retained earnings
629

 
576

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(88
)
 
(106
)
Treasury stock – 1,934,967 and 1,806,303 shares at cost
(23
)
 
(21
)
Total Stockholders’ Equity
4,680

 
4,608

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
$
33,695

 
$
33,102

 
(1)
Amount represents loans for which we have elected the fair value option. See Note 17.
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

4

Table of Contents                             

F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Dollars in millions, except per share data
Unaudited
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
2019
 
2018
Interest Income
 
 
 
Loans and leases, including fees
$
269

 
$
239

Securities:
 
 
 
Taxable
33

 
27

Tax-exempt
8

 
7

Total Interest Income
310

 
273

Interest Expense
 
 
 
Deposits
50

 
27

Short-term borrowings
26

 
15

Long-term borrowings
3

 
5

Total Interest Expense
79

 
47

Net Interest Income
231

 
226

Provision for credit losses
14

 
14

Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses
217

 
212

Non-Interest Income
 
 
 
Service charges
30

 
30

Trust services
7

 
7

Insurance commissions and fees
5

 
5

Securities commissions and fees
4

 
4

Capital markets income
6

 
5

Mortgage banking operations
4

 
6

Dividends on non-marketable equity securities
5

 
4

Bank owned life insurance
3

 
3

Other
1

 
3

Total Non-Interest Income
65

 
67

Non-Interest Expense
 
 
 
Salaries and employee benefits
91

 
89

Net occupancy
15

 
16

Equipment
15

 
14

Amortization of intangibles
4

 
4

Outside services
15

 
15

FDIC insurance
6

 
9

Bank shares and franchise taxes
3

 
3

Other
17

 
21

Total Non-Interest Expense
166

 
171

Income Before Income Taxes
116

 
108

Income taxes
22

 
21

Net Income
94

 
87

Preferred stock dividends
2

 
2

Net Income Available to Common Stockholders
$
92

 
$
85

Earnings per Common Share
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.28

 
$
0.26

Diluted
$
0.28

 
$
0.26

Cash Dividends per Common Share
$
0.12

 
$
0.12

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

5

Table of Contents                             

F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Dollars in millions
Unaudited
 
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
2019
 
2018
Net income
$
94

 
$
87

Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
Securities available for sale:
 
 
 
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax expense (benefit) of $7 and $(8)
24

 
(30
)
Derivative instruments:
 
 
 
Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period, net of tax (benefit) expense of $(2) and $1
(6
)
 
4

Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income, net of tax expense (benefit) of $0 and $0
(1
)
 

Pension and postretirement benefit obligations:
 
 
 
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax expense (benefit) of $0 and $0 
1

 

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
18

 
(26
)
Comprehensive Income
$
112

 
$
61

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)


6

Table of Contents                             

F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Dollars in millions, except per share data
Unaudited
 
 
Preferred
Stock
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total
Balance at January 1, 2018
$
107

 
$
3

 
$
4,033

 
$
368

 
$
(83
)
 
$
(19
)
 
$
4,409

Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
87

 
(26
)
 
 
 
61

Dividends declared:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2
)
 
 
 
 
 
(2
)
Common stock: $0.12/share
 
 
 
 
 
 
(39
)
 
 
 
 
 
(39
)
Issuance of common stock
 
 

 
2

 
 
 
 
 

 
2

Restricted stock compensation
 
 
 
 
2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2

Balance at March 31, 2018
$
107

 
$
3

 
$
4,037

 
$
414

 
$
(109
)
 
$
(19
)
 
$
4,433

Balance at January 1, 2019
$
107

 
$
3

 
$
4,049

 
$
576

 
$
(106
)
 
$
(21
)
 
$
4,608

Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
94

 
18

 
 
 
112

Dividends declared:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2
)
 
 
 
 
 
(2
)
Common stock: $0.12/share
 
 
 
 
 
 
(39
)
 
 
 
 
 
(39
)
Issuance of common stock
 
 

 
1

 
 
 
 
 
(2
)
 
(1
)
Restricted stock compensation
 
 
 
 
2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2

Balance at March 31, 2019
$
107

 
$
3

 
$
4,052

 
$
629

 
$
(88
)
 
$
(23
)
 
$
4,680

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)


7

Table of Contents                             

F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Dollars in millions
Unaudited
 
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
2019
 
2018
Operating Activities
 
 
 
Net income
$
94

 
$
87

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
7

 
24

Provision for credit losses
14

 
14

Deferred tax expense
2

 
2

Loans originated for sale
(217
)
 
(209
)
Loans sold
206

 
269

Net gain on sale of loans
(4
)
 
(5
)
Net change in:
 
 
 
   Interest receivable
(11
)
 
(1
)
   Interest payable
3

 

   Bank owned life insurance
(1
)
 
(3
)
Other, net
(76
)
 
32

Net cash flows provided by operating activities
17

 
210

Investing Activities
 
 
 
Net change in loans and leases
(467
)
 
(284
)
Debt securities available for sale:
 
 
 
Purchases
(175
)
 
(358
)
Maturities
142

 
153

Debt securities held to maturity:
 
 
 
Purchases
(25
)
 
(64
)
Maturities
107

 
81

Increase in premises and equipment
(10
)
 
(9
)
Net cash flows used in investing activities
(428
)
 
(481
)
Financing Activities
 
 
 
Net change in:
 
 
 
Demand (non-interest bearing and interest bearing) and savings accounts
205

 
(23
)
Time deposits
224

 
122

Short-term borrowings
(18
)
 
124

Proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings
228

 
10

Repayment of long-term borrowings
(179
)
 
(18
)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
1

 
4

Cash dividends paid:
 
 
 
Preferred stock
(2
)
 
(2
)
Common stock
(39
)
 
(39
)
Net cash flows provided by financing activities
420

 
178

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
9

 
(93
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
488

 
479

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
$
497

 
$
386

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

8

Table of Contents                             

F.N.B. CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2019
The terms “FNB,” “the Corporation,” “we,” “us” and “our” throughout this Report mean F.N.B. Corporation and our consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates that we refer only to the parent company, F.N.B. Corporation. When we refer to "FNBPA" in this Report, we mean our only bank subsidiary, First National Bank of Pennsylvania, and its subsidiaries.
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
F.N.B. Corporation, headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is a diversified financial services company operating in seven states and the District of Columbia. Our market coverage spans several major metropolitan areas including: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Baltimore, Maryland; Cleveland, Ohio; Washington, D.C.; and Charlotte, Raleigh, Durham and the Piedmont Triad (Winston-Salem, Greensboro and High Point) in North Carolina. As of March 31, 2019, we had 397 banking offices throughout Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland, West Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina.
We provide a full range of commercial banking, consumer banking and wealth management solutions through our subsidiary network which is led by our largest affiliate, FNBPA, founded in 1864. Commercial banking solutions include corporate banking, small business banking, investment real estate financing, government banking, business credit, capital markets and lease financing. Consumer banking provides a full line of consumer banking products and services including deposit products, mortgage lending, consumer lending and a complete suite of mobile and online banking services. Wealth management services include asset management, private banking and insurance.

NOTE 1.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
Our accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) include subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. We own and operate FNBPA, First National Trust Company, First National Investment Services Company, LLC, F.N.B. Investment Advisors, Inc., First National Insurance Agency, LLC, Bank Capital Services, LLC and F.N.B. Capital Corporation, LLC, and include results for each of these entities in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Companies in which we hold more than a 50% voting equity interest, or a controlling financial interest, or are a variable interest entity (VIE) in which we have the power to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and has an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE which could potentially be significant to the VIE are consolidated. VIEs in which we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance or does not have an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE which could potentially be significant to the VIE are not consolidated. Investments in companies that are not consolidated are accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to exert significant influence. Investments in private investment partnerships that are accounted for under the equity method or the cost method are included in other assets and our proportional interest in the equity investments’ earnings are included in other non-interest income. Investment interests accounted for under the cost and equity methods are periodically evaluated for impairment.
The accompanying interim unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements include all adjustments that are necessary, in the opinion of management, to fairly reflect our financial position and results of operations in accordance with GAAP. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on our net income and stockholders’ equity. Events occurring subsequent to March 31, 2019 have been evaluated for potential recognition or disclosure in the Consolidated Financial Statements through the date of the filing of the Consolidated Financial Statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Certain information and Note disclosures normally included in Consolidated Financial Statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. The interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating results FNB expects for the full year. These interim unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019. For a detailed description of our significant

9

Table of Contents                             

accounting policies, see Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The accounting policies presented below have been added or amended for newly material items or the adoption of new accounting standards.
Use of Estimates
Our accounting and reporting policies conform with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited). Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes include the allowance for credit losses, accounting for loans acquired in a business combination, fair value of financial instruments, goodwill and other intangible assets, litigation, income taxes and deferred tax assets.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
From time to time, we may enter into derivative transactions principally to protect against the risk of adverse price or interest rate movements on the value of certain assets and liabilities and on future cash flows. All derivative instruments are carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either an asset or liability. Accounting for the changes in fair value of a derivative is dependent upon whether it has been designated in a formal, qualifying hedging relationship. For derivatives in qualifying hedging relationships, we formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk management objective and strategy for undertaking each hedge transaction. Cash flows from hedging activities are classified in the same category as the items hedged.
Beginning in the first quarter of 2019, we adopted ASU 2017-12 which provides targeted improvements to the hedge accounting model that more closely aligns the accounting and reporting for hedging relationships with risk management activities. In addition, ASU 2017-12 provides administrative relief by easing documentation requirements, simplifying the application of hedge accounting by expanding the application of the shortcut method, eliminating the separate measurement and reporting of hedge ineffectiveness and generally requiring the entire effect of the hedging instrument and the hedged item to be presented in the same income statement line item. We believe these changes will provide users with more useful information about the effect of our risk management activities on the financial statements.
Changes in fair value of a derivative instrument that has been designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge, including any ineffectiveness, are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. Amounts are reclassified from AOCI to the consolidated statements of income in the same line item used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item in the period or periods in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Prior to 2019, the ineffective portion, if any, was reported in earnings immediately.
At the hedge’s inception a formal assessment is performed to determine whether changes in the fair values or cash flows of the derivative instruments have been highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged items and whether they are expected to be highly effective in the future. At each reporting period thereafter, a statistical regression or qualitative analysis is performed to evaluate hedge effectiveness. If it is determined a derivative instrument has not been or will not continue to be highly effective as a hedge, hedge accounting is discontinued.
In addition, we enter into interest rate swap agreements to meet the financing, interest rate and equity risk management needs of qualifying commercial loan customers. These agreements provide the customer the ability to convert from variable to fixed interest rates. We then enter into positions with a derivative counterparty in order to offset our exposure on the fixed components of the customer agreements. The credit risk associated with derivatives executed with customers is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans and is subject to normal credit policies and monitoring. We seek to minimize counterparty credit risk by entering into transactions with only high-quality institutions. These arrangements meet the definition of derivatives, but are not designated as qualifying hedging relationships. The interest rate swap agreement with the loan customer and with the counterparty are reported at fair value in other assets and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period earnings as other income.
Leases
We determine if an arrangement is, or contains, a lease at inception of the contract. As a lessee, we consider a contract to be, or contain, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset in exchange for consideration. We recognize in our Consolidated Balance Sheets the obligation to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing our right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For an operating lease, the right-of-use asset and lease liability are included

10

Table of Contents                             

in other assets and other liabilities, respectively. Finance leases are included in premises and equipment, and other liabilities. We do not record leases with an initial term of 12 months or less on the Balance Sheet, instead we recognize lease expense for leases with an initial term of 12 months or less on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For leases that commenced before January 1, 2019, we have applied the modified retrospective approach which resulted in comparative information not being restated. The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We elected the ‘package of practical expedients,’ which permits us to not reassess our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct cost.
Right-of-use assets and liabilities are initially measured at the present value of lease payments over the lease term, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease at the commencement date. If the rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily determined, we discount the lease using our incremental borrowing rate which is derived by reference to FNB's secured borrowing rate. Our leases may include options to extend the lease. When it is reasonably certain that we will exercise an option, the lease term includes those periods. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
We have real estate lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, which are generally accounted for as a single lease component.
As a lessor, when a lease meets certain criteria indicating that we effectively have transferred control of the underlying asset to the customer, the lease is classified as a sales-type lease. When a lease does not meet the criteria for a sales-type lease but meets the criteria of a direct financing lease, the lease is classified as a direct financing lease. When none of the required criteria for sales-type lease or direct-financing lease are met, the lease is classified as an operating lease.
Both sales-type leases and direct financing leases are recognized as a net investment in the lease. The net investment comprises the lease receivable including any residual value of the underlying asset that is guaranteed by the customer or any other third party unrelated to us and the unguaranteed residual value of the underlying asset. Operating lease income is recognized over the lease term on a straight-line basis. We do not evaluate whether sales taxes and similar taxes imposed by a governmental authority on lease transactions and collected by us are our primary obligation as owner of the underlying leased asset and exclude from lease income all taxes collected.
NOTE 2.    NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The following table summarizes accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board that we recently adopted or will be adopting in the future.
TABLE 2.1
Standard
 
Description
 
Required Date of Adoption
 
Financial Statements Impact
Derivative and Hedging Activities
 
 
 
 
ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities
 
This Update improves the financial reporting of hedging to better align with a company’s risk management activities. In addition, this Update makes certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the current hedge accounting guidance.
 
January 1, 2019
Early adoption is permitted.
 
This Update was applied using a modified retrospective method. The presentation and disclosure guidance were applied prospectively. The adoption of this Update did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
ASU 2017-08, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities
 
This Update shortens the amortization period for the premium on certain purchased callable securities to the earliest call date. The accounting for purchased callable debt securities held at a discount does not change.
 
January 1, 2019
Early adoption is permitted.
 
This Update was applied using a modified retrospective transition method. The adoption of this Update did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.


11

Table of Contents                             

Standard
 
Description
 
Required Date of Adoption
 
Financial Statements Impact
Credit Losses
 
 
 
 
 
 
ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

ASU 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses

ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments

 
These Updates replace the current incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects current expected credit losses (commonly referred to as CECL) for most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments, including loans, HTM debt securities, net investments in leases and off-balance sheet credit exposures. CECL requires loss estimates for the remaining life of the financial asset at the time the asset is originated or acquired, considering historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. In addition, the Update will require the use of a modified AFS debt security impairment model and eliminate the current accounting for purchased credit impaired loans and debt securities.
 
January 1, 2020
Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018
 
These Updates are to be applied using a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The CECL model is a significant change from existing GAAP and may result in a material change to our accounting for financial instruments and regulatory capital. We have created a cross-functional steering committee to govern implementation. We are in the process of implementing a new modeling platform and integrating other auxiliary models to support a calculation of expected credit losses under CECL. We have made preliminary decisions on segmentation and are finalizing other inputs necessary to execute parallel runs beginning in the second quarter of 2019 to ensure we are ready to calculate, review and report on our CECL allowance for credit losses for the first quarter of 2020. The impact of this Update will be dependent on the portfolio composition, credit quality and forecasts of economic conditions at the time of adoption.
Leases
 
 
 
 
 
 
ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842)

ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases
ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842), Targeted Improvements
ASU 2018-20, Leases (Topic 842), Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors
ASU 2019-01, Lease (Topic 842), Codification Improvements



 
These Updates require lessees to put most leases on the Consolidated Balance Sheets but recognize expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income similar to current accounting. In addition, the Update changes the guidance for sales-leaseback transactions, initial direct costs and lease executory costs for most entities. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease related revenue and expense.
 
January 1, 2019
Early adoption is permitted.
 
We adopted these Updates in the first quarter of 2019 under the modified retrospective approach. In addition, the new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We elected the ‘package of practical expedients,’ which permits us to not reassess our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs.
Adoption of the new standard resulted in the recording of $116 million in right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities of $126 million for operating leases on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The standard did not materially impact our consolidated net earnings and had no impact on cash flows.



12

Table of Contents                             

NOTE 3.    SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities are as follows:
TABLE 3.1
 
(in millions)
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
 Value
Debt Securities Available for Sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government agencies
$
182

 
$

 
$
(1
)
 
$
181

U.S. government-sponsored entities
301

 

 
(2
)
 
299

Residential mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency mortgage-backed securities
1,396

 
1

 
(19
)
 
1,378

Agency collateralized mortgage obligations
1,305

 
8

 
(15
)
 
1,298

Commercial mortgage-backed securities
228

 
1

 
(1
)
 
228

States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
17

 

 

 
17

Other debt securities
2

 

 

 
2

Total debt securities available for sale
$
3,431

 
$
10

 
$
(38
)
 
$
3,403

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government agencies
$
188

 
$

 
$
(1
)
 
$
187

U.S. government-sponsored entities
317

 

 
(4
)
 
313

Residential mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency mortgage-backed securities
1,465

 

 
(36
)
 
1,429

Agency collateralized mortgage obligations
1,179

 
5

 
(23
)
 
1,161

Commercial mortgage-backed securities
229

 

 
(1
)
 
228

States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
21

 

 

 
21

Other debt securities
2

 

 

 
2

Total debt securities available for sale
$
3,401

 
$
5

 
$
(65
)
 
$
3,341



13

Table of Contents                             

(in millions)
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
 Value
Debt Securities Held to Maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury
$
1

 
$

 
$

 
$
1

U.S. government agencies
2

 

 

 
2

U.S. government-sponsored entities
200

 

 
(3
)
 
197

Residential mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency mortgage-backed securities
997

 
1

 
(11
)
 
987

Agency collateralized mortgage obligations
764

 
3

 
(16
)
 
751

Commercial mortgage-backed securities
104

 
2

 
(1
)
 
105

States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
1,103

 
9

 
(16
)
 
1,096

Total debt securities held to maturity
$
3,171

 
$
15

 
$
(47
)
 
$
3,139

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury
$
1

 
$

 
$

 
$
1

U.S. government agencies
2

 

 

 
2

U.S. government-sponsored entities
215

 

 
(4
)
 
211

Residential mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency mortgage-backed securities
1,036

 

 
(26
)
 
1,010

Agency collateralized mortgage obligations
794

 
1

 
(24
)
 
771

Commercial mortgage-backed securities
126

 
1

 
(1
)
 
126

States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
1,080

 
3

 
(49
)
 
1,034

Total debt securities held to maturity
$
3,254

 
$
5

 
$
(104
)
 
$
3,155


 

There were no gross gains or gross losses realized on securities during the three months ended March 31, 2019 or 2018.
As of March 31, 2019, the amortized cost and fair value of debt securities, by contractual maturities, were as follows:
TABLE 3.2
 
Available for Sale
 
Held to Maturity
(in millions)
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
Due in one year or less
$
78

 
$
77

 
$
42

 
$
41

Due after one year but within five years
240

 
238

 
175

 
173

Due after five years but within ten years
78

 
78

 
111

 
112

Due after ten years
106

 
106

 
978

 
970

 
502

 
499

 
1,306

 
1,296

Residential mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency mortgage-backed securities
1,396

 
1,378

 
997

 
987

Agency collateralized mortgage obligations
1,305

 
1,298

 
764

 
751

Commercial mortgage-backed securities
228

 
228

 
104

 
105

Total debt securities
$
3,431

 
$
3,403

 
$
3,171

 
$
3,139


Maturities may differ from contractual terms because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties. Periodic payments are received on residential mortgage-backed securities based on the payment patterns of the underlying collateral.

14

Table of Contents                             

Following is information relating to securities pledged:
TABLE 3.3
(dollars in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Securities pledged (carrying value):
 
 
 
To secure public deposits, trust deposits and for other purposes as required by law
$
3,799

 
$
3,874

As collateral for short-term borrowings
255

 
279

Securities pledged as a percent of total securities
61.7
%
 
63.0
%

Following are summaries of the fair values and unrealized losses of temporarily-impaired debt securities, segregated by length of impairment. The unrealized losses reported below are generally due to the higher interest rate environment.

TABLE 3.4
 
Less than 12 Months
 
12 Months or More
 
Total
(dollars in millions)
#
 
Fair
 Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
#
 
Fair
 Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
#
 
Fair
 Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
Debt Securities Available for Sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government agencies
19

 
$
123

 
$

 
3

 
$
48

 
$
(1
)
 
22

 
$
171

 
$
(1
)
U.S. government-sponsored entities

 

 

 
11

 
249

 
(2
)
 
11

 
249

 
(2
)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 
85

 
1,288

 
(19
)
 
85

 
1,288

 
(19
)
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations

 

 

 
48

 
613

 
(15
)
 
48

 
613

 
(15
)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
2

 
73

 
(1
)
 

 

 

 
2

 
73

 
(1
)
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions

 

 

 
5

 
8

 

 
5

 
8

 

Other debt securities

 

 

 
1

 
2

 

 
1

 
2

 

Total temporarily impaired debt securities AFS
21

 
$
196

 
$
(1
)
 
153

 
$
2,208

 
$
(37
)
 
174

 
$
2,404

 
$
(38
)
December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government agencies
20

 
$
145

 
$
(1
)
 

 
$

 
$

 
20

 
$
145

 
$
(1
)
U.S. government-sponsored entities
1

 
36

 

 
11

 
227

 
(4
)
 
12

 
263

 
(4
)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency mortgage-backed securities
16

 
259

 
(4
)
 
71

 
1,159

 
(32
)
 
87

 
1,418

 
(36
)
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations
2

 
82

 
(1
)
 
47

 
590

 
(22
)
 
49

 
672

 
(23
)
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations
1

 

 

 

 

 

 
1

 

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities
4

 
155

 
(1
)
 

 

 

 
4

 
155

 
(1
)
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
2

 
2

 

 
6

 
10

 

 
8

 
12

 

Other debt securities

 

 

 
1

 
2

 

 
1

 
2

 

Total temporarily impaired debt securities AFS
46

 
$
679

 
$
(7
)
 
136

 
$
1,988

 
$
(58
)
 
182

 
$
2,667

 
$
(65
)

15

Table of Contents                             

 
Less than 12 Months
 
12 Months or More
 
Total
(dollars in millions)
#
 
Fair
 Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
#
 
Fair
 Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
#
 
Fair
 Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
Debt Securities Held to Maturity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored entities

 
$

 
$

 
11

 
$
197

 
$
(3
)
 
11

 
$
197

 
$
(3
)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 
62

 
819

 
(11
)
 
62

 
819

 
(11
)
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations

 

 

 
48

 
591

 
(16
)
 
48

 
591

 
(16
)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
1

 
1

 

 
3

 
32

 
(1
)
 
4

 
33

 
(1
)
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
12

 
57

 
(1
)
 
77

 
305

 
(15
)
 
89

 
362

 
(16
)
Total temporarily impaired debt securities HTM
13

 
$
58

 
$
(1
)
 
201

 
$
1,944

 
$
(46
)
 
214

 
$
2,002

 
$
(47
)
December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored entities

 
$

 
$

 
12

 
$
211

 
$
(4
)
 
12

 
$
211

 
$
(4
)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency mortgage-backed securities
43

 
294

 
(4
)
 
47

 
694

 
(22
)
 
90

 
988

 
(26
)
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations
3

 
42

 

 
49

 
611

 
(24
)
 
52

 
653

 
(24
)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
5

 
26

 

 
4

 
43

 
(1
)
 
9

 
69

 
(1
)
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
159

 
590

 
(27
)
 
51

 
161

 
(22
)
 
210

 
751

 
(49
)
Total temporarily impaired debt securities HTM
210

 
$
952

 
$
(31
)
 
163

 
$
1,720

 
$
(73
)
 
373

 
$
2,672

 
$
(104
)

We do not intend to sell the debt securities and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
We evaluate our investment securities portfolio for OTTI on a quarterly basis. Impairment is assessed at the individual security level. We consider an investment security impaired if the fair value of the security is less than its cost or amortized cost basis. We did not recognize any OTTI losses on securities for the three months ended March 31, 2019 or 2018.
States of the U.S. and Political Subdivisions
Our municipal bond portfolio with a carrying amount of $1.1 billion as of March 31, 2019 is highly rated with an average rating of AA and 100% of the portfolio rated A or better, while 99% have stand-alone ratings of A or better. All of the securities in the municipal portfolio are general obligation bonds. Geographically, municipal bonds support our primary footprint as 66% of the securities are from municipalities located in our footprint. The average holding size of the securities in the municipal bond portfolio is $3.2 million. In addition to the strong stand-alone ratings, 64% of the municipalities have some formal credit enhancement insurance that strengthens the creditworthiness of their issue. Management reviews the credit profile of each issuer on a quarterly basis.


16

Table of Contents                             

NOTE 4.    LOANS AND LEASES
Following is a summary of loans and leases, net of unearned income:
TABLE 4.1
(in millions)
Originated
Loans and
Leases
 
Loans Acquired
in a Business Combination
 
Total
Loans and
Leases
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
6,412

 
$
2,423

 
$
8,835

Commercial and industrial
4,509

 
380

 
4,889

Commercial leases
374

 

 
374

Other
49

 

 
49

Total commercial loans and leases
11,344

 
2,803

 
14,147

Direct installment
1,657

 
87

 
1,744

Residential mortgages
2,755

 
478

 
3,233

Indirect installment
1,950

 

 
1,950

Consumer lines of credit
1,106

 
440

 
1,546

Total consumer loans
7,468

 
1,005

 
8,473

Total loans and leases, net of unearned income
$
18,812

 
$
3,808

 
$
22,620

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
6,171

 
$
2,615

 
$
8,786

Commercial and industrial
4,140

 
416

 
4,556

Commercial leases
373

 

 
373

Other
46

 

 
46

Total commercial loans and leases
10,730

 
3,031

 
13,761

Direct installment
1,668

 
96

 
1,764

Residential mortgages
2,612

 
501

 
3,113

Indirect installment
1,933

 

 
1,933

Consumer lines of credit
1,119

 
463

 
1,582

Total consumer loans
7,332

 
1,060

 
8,392

Total loans and leases, net of unearned income
$
18,062

 
$
4,091

 
$
22,153


The loans and leases portfolio categories are comprised of the following:
Commercial real estate includes both owner-occupied and non-owner-occupied loans secured by commercial properties;
Commercial and industrial includes loans to businesses that are not secured by real estate;
Commercial leases consist of leases for new or used equipment;
Other is comprised primarily of credit cards and mezzanine loans;
Direct installment is comprised of fixed-rate, closed-end consumer loans for personal, family or household use, such as home equity loans and automobile loans;
Residential mortgages consist of conventional and jumbo mortgage loans for 1-4 family properties;
Indirect installment is comprised of loans originated by approved third parties and underwritten by us, primarily automobile loans; and

17

Table of Contents                             

Consumer lines of credit include home equity lines of credit and consumer lines of credit that are either unsecured or secured by collateral other than home equity.
The loans and leases portfolio consists principally of loans to individuals and small- and medium-sized businesses within our primary market in seven states and the District of Columbia. Our primary market coverage spans several major metropolitan areas including: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Baltimore, Maryland; Cleveland, Ohio; Washington, D.C.; and Charlotte, Raleigh, Durham and the Piedmont Triad (Winston-Salem, Greensboro and High Point) in North Carolina.
The following table shows certain information relating to commercial real estate loans:
TABLE 4.2
(dollars in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Commercial construction, acquisition and development loans
$
1,242

 
$
1,152

Percent of total loans and leases
5.5
%
 
5.2
%
Commercial real estate:
 
 
 
Percent owner-occupied
32.1
%
 
35.1
%
Percent non-owner-occupied
67.9
%
 
64.9
%

As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had residential construction loans of $329.9 million and $273.4 million, representing 1.5% and 1.2% of total loans and leases, respectively.
Loans Acquired in a Business Combination
All loans acquired in a business combination were initially recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. Refer to the Loans Acquired in a Business Combination section in Note 1 of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of ASC 310-20 and ASC 310-30 loans. The outstanding balance and the carrying amount of loans acquired in a business combination included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:
TABLE 4.3
(in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Accounted for under ASC 310-30:
 
 
 
Outstanding balance
$
3,515

 
$
3,768

Carrying amount
3,252

 
3,570

Accounted for under ASC 310-20:
 
 
 
Outstanding balance
566

 
602

Carrying amount
547

 
513

Total loans acquired in a business combination:
 
 
 
Outstanding balance
4,081

 
4,370

Carrying amount
3,799

 
4,083


The outstanding balance is the undiscounted sum of all amounts owed under the loan, including amounts deemed principal, interest, fees, penalties and other, whether or not currently due and whether or not any such amounts have been written or charged-off.
The carrying amount of purchased credit impaired loans included in the table above totaled $1.7 million at both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, representing 0.04% of the carrying amount of total loans acquired in a business combination as of each date.

18

Table of Contents                             

The following table provides changes in accretable yield for all loans acquired in business combinations that are accounted for under ASC 310-30. Loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 are not included in this table.
TABLE 4.4
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(in millions)
2019
 
2018
Balance at beginning of period
$
605

 
$
708

Reduction due to unexpected early payoffs
(20
)
 
(26
)
Reclass from non-accretable difference to accretable yield
30

 
64

Accretion
(50
)
 
(59
)
Balance at end of period
$
565

 
$
687


Cash flows expected to be collected on loans acquired in business combinations are estimated quarterly by incorporating several key assumptions similar to the initial estimate of fair value. These key assumptions include probability of default and the amount of actual prepayments after the acquisition date. Prepayments affect the estimated life of the loans and could change the amount of interest income. In reforecasting future estimated cash flows, credit loss expectations are adjusted as necessary. Improved cash flow expectations for loans or pools are recorded first as a reversal of previously recorded impairment, if any, and then as an increase in prospective yield when all previously recorded impairment has been recaptured. Decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairment through a charge to the provision for credit losses and credit to the allowance for credit losses.
The excess of cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition over recorded fair value is referred to as the accretable yield.
The accretable yield is recognized into income over the remaining life of the loan, or pool of loans, using an effective yield
method, since the timing and/or amount of cash flows expected to be collected can be reasonably estimated (the accretion model). The difference between the loan’s total scheduled principal and interest payments over all cash flows expected at acquisition is referred to as the non-accretable difference. The non-accretable difference represents contractually required principal and interest payments which we do not expect to collect.
During the three months ended March 31, 2019, there was an overall improvement in cash flow expectations which resulted in a net reclassification of $30.0 million from the non-accretable difference to accretable yield primarily driven by overall improvement in the primary credit quality indicators of the majority of the acquired loan pools. This reclassification was $64.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018. The reclassification from the non-accretable difference to the accretable yield results in prospective yield adjustments on the loan pools.
Credit Quality
Management monitors the credit quality of our loan portfolio using several performance measures based on payment activity and borrower performance.
Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans and non-performing TDRs. Past due loans are reviewed on a monthly basis to identify loans for non-accrual status. We place loans on non-accrual status and discontinue interest accruals on loans generally when principal or interest is due and has remained unpaid for a certain number of days or when the full amount of principal and interest is due and has remained unpaid for a certain number of days, unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. Commercial loans and leases are placed on non-accrual at 90 days, installment loans are placed on non-accrual at 120 days and residential mortgages and consumer lines of credit are placed on non-accrual at 180 days, though we may place a loan on non-accrual prior to these past due thresholds as warranted. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Non-accrual loans may not be restored to accrual status until all delinquent principal and interest have been paid and the ultimate ability to collect the remaining principal and interest is reasonably assured. The majority of TDRs are loans in which we have granted a concession on the interest rate or the original repayment terms due to the borrower’s financial distress.

19

Table of Contents                             

Following is a summary of non-performing assets:
TABLE 4.5
(dollars in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Non-accrual loans
$
78

 
$
79

Troubled debt restructurings
20

 
21

Total non-performing loans
98

 
100

Other real estate owned
34

 
35

Total non-performing assets
$
132

 
$
135

Asset quality ratios:
 
 
 
Non-performing loans / total loans and leases
0.43
%
 
0.45
%
Non-performing loans + OREO / total loans and leases + OREO
0.58
%
 
0.61
%
Non-performing assets / total assets
0.39
%
 
0.41
%

The carrying value of residential other real estate owned held as a result of obtaining physical possession upon completion of a foreclosure or through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure amounted to $4.4 million at March 31, 2019 and $6.3 million at December 31, 2018. The recorded investment of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 totaled $9.3 million and $8.9 million, respectively.

20

Table of Contents                             

The following tables provide an analysis of the aging of loans by class segregated by loans and leases originated and loans acquired:
TABLE 4.6
(in millions)
30-89 Days
Past Due
 
> 90 Days
Past Due
and Still
Accruing
 
Non-
Accrual
 
Total
Past Due
 
Current
 
Total
Loans and
Leases
Originated Loans and Leases
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
8

 
$

 
$
20

 
$
28

 
$
6,384

 
$
6,412

Commercial and industrial
9

 

 
18

 
27

 
4,482

 
4,509

Commercial leases
1

 

 
2

 
3

 
371

 
374

Other

 

 
1

 
1

 
48

 
49

Total commercial loans and leases
18

 

 
41

 
59

 
11,285

 
11,344

Direct installment
6

 
1

 
8

 
15

 
1,642

 
1,657

Residential mortgages
13

 
4

 
7

 
24

 
2,731

 
2,755

Indirect installment
9

 

 
2

 
11

 
1,939

 
1,950

Consumer lines of credit
5

 
1

 
3

 
9

 
1,097

 
1,106

Total consumer loans
33

 
6

 
20

 
59

 
7,409

 
7,468

Total originated loans and leases
$
51

 
$
6

 
$
61

 
$
118

 
$
18,694

 
$
18,812

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
7

 
$

 
$
17

 
$
24

 
$
6,147

 
$
6,171

Commercial and industrial
5

 

 
19

 
24

 
4,116

 
4,140

Commercial leases
1

 

 
2

 
3

 
370

 
373

Other

 

 
1

 
1

 
45

 
46

Total commercial loans and leases
13

 

 
39

 
52

 
10,678

 
10,730

Direct installment
8

 

 
8

 
16

 
1,652

 
1,668

Residential mortgages
16

 
3

 
6

 
25

 
2,587

 
2,612

Indirect installment
11

 
1

 
2

 
14

 
1,919

 
1,933

Consumer lines of credit
5

 
1

 
3

 
9

 
1,110

 
1,119

Total consumer loans
40

 
5

 
19

 
64

 
7,268

 
7,332

Total originated loans and leases
$
53

 
$
5

 
$
58

 
$
116

 
$
17,946

 
$
18,062



21

Table of Contents                             

(in millions)
30-89
Days
Past Due
 
> 90 Days
Past Due
and Still
Accruing
 
Non-
Accrual
 
Total
Past Due
(1) (2)
 
Current
 
(Discount) Premium
 
Total
Loans
Loans Acquired in a Business Combination
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
14

 
$
37

 
$
3

 
$
54

 
$
2,530

 
$
(161
)
 
$
2,423

Commercial and industrial
1

 
4

 
13

 
18

 
387

 
(25
)
 
380

Total commercial loans
15

 
41

 
16

 
72

 
2,917

 
(186
)
 
2,803

Direct installment
2

 
1

 

 
3

 
84

 

 
87

Residential mortgages
13

 
5

 

 
18

 
476

 
(16
)
 
478

Consumer lines of credit
6

 
2

 
1

 
9

 
440

 
(9
)
 
440

Total consumer loans
21

 
8

 
1

 
30

 
1,000

 
(25
)
 
1,005

Total loans acquired in a business combination
$
36

 
$
49

 
$
17

 
$
102

 
$
3,917

 
$
(211
)
 
$
3,808

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
19

 
$
38

 
$
3

 
$
60

 
$
2,723

 
$
(168
)
 
$
2,615

Commercial and industrial
3

 
4

 
17

 
24

 
420

 
(28
)
 
416

Total commercial loans
22

 
42

 
20

 
84

 
3,143

 
(196
)
 
3,031

Direct installment
3

 
2

 

 
5

 
91

 

 
96

Residential mortgages
13

 
6

 

 
19

 
498

 
(16
)
 
501

Consumer lines of credit
8

 
3

 
1

 
12

 
461

 
(10
)
 
463

Total consumer loans
24

 
11

 
1

 
36

 
1,050

 
(26
)
 
1,060

Total loans acquired in a business combination
$
46

 
$
53

 
$
21

 
$
120

 
$
4,193

 
$
(222
)
 
$
4,091


(1)
Loans acquired in a business combination are considered performing upon acquisition, regardless of whether the customer is contractually delinquent, if we can reasonably estimate the timing and amount of expected cash flows on such loans. In these instances, we do not consider acquired contractually delinquent loans to be non-accrual or non-performing and continue to recognize interest income on these loans using the accretion method. Loans acquired in a business combination are considered non-accrual or non-performing when, due to credit deterioration or other factors, we determine we are no longer able to reasonably estimate the timing and amount of expected cash flows on such loans. We do not recognize interest income on loans acquired in a business combination considered non-accrual or non-performing.
(2)
Past due information for loans acquired in a business combination is based on the contractual balance outstanding at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

22

Table of Contents                             

We utilize the following categories to monitor credit quality within our commercial loan and lease portfolio:
TABLE 4.7
Rating
Category
Definition
Pass
in general, the condition of the borrower and the performance of the loan is satisfactory or better
 
 
Special Mention
in general, the condition of the borrower has deteriorated, requiring an increased level of monitoring
 
 
Substandard
in general, the condition of the borrower has significantly deteriorated and the performance of the loan could further deteriorate if deficiencies are not corrected
 
 
Doubtful
in general, the condition of the borrower has significantly deteriorated and the collection in full of both principal and interest is highly questionable or improbable

The use of these internally assigned credit quality categories within the commercial loan and lease portfolio permits management’s use of transition matrices to estimate a quantitative portion of credit risk. Our internal credit risk grading system is based on past experiences with similarly graded loans and leases and conforms with regulatory categories. In general, loan and lease risk ratings within each category are reviewed on an ongoing basis according to our policy for each class of loans and leases. Each quarter, management analyzes the resulting ratings, as well as other external statistics and factors such as delinquency, to track the migration performance of the commercial loan and lease portfolio. Loans and leases within the Pass credit category or that migrate toward the Pass credit category generally have a lower risk of loss compared to loans and leases that migrate toward the Substandard or Doubtful credit categories. Accordingly, management applies higher risk factors to Substandard and Doubtful credit categories.

23

Table of Contents                             

The following tables present a summary of our commercial loans and leases by credit quality category, segregated by loans and leases originated and loans acquired:
TABLE 4.8
 
Commercial Loan and Lease Credit Quality Categories
(in millions)
Pass
 
Special
Mention
 
Substandard
 
Doubtful
 
Total
Originated Loans and Leases
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
6,114

 
$
156

 
$
142

 
$

 
$
6,412

Commercial and industrial
4,248

 
167

 
93

 
1

 
4,509

Commercial leases
365

 
2

 
7

 

 
374

Other
48

 

 
1

 

 
49

Total originated commercial loans and leases
$
10,775

 
$
325

 
$
243

 
$
1

 
$
11,344

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
5,883

 
$
163

 
$
125

 
$

 
$
6,171

Commercial and industrial
3,879

 
180

 
81

 

 
4,140

Commercial leases
366

 
1

 
6

 

 
373

Other
45

 

 
1

 

 
46

Total originated commercial loans and leases
$
10,173

 
$
344

 
$
213

 
$

 
$
10,730

Loans Acquired in a Business Combination
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
2,079

 
$
160

 
$
184

 
$

 
$
2,423

Commercial and industrial
325

 
17

 
33

 
5

 
380

Total commercial loans acquired in a business combination
$
2,404

 
$
177

 
$
217

 
$
5

 
$
2,803

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
2,256

 
$
168

 
$
191

 
$

 
$
2,615

Commercial and industrial
355

 
18

 
43

 

 
416

Total commercial loans acquired in a business combination
$
2,611

 
$
186

 
$
234

 
$

 
$
3,031


Credit quality information for loans acquired in a business combination is based on the contractual balance outstanding at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
We use delinquency transition matrices within the consumer and other loan classes to enable management to estimate a quantitative portion of credit risk. Each month, management analyzes payment and volume activity, Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) scores and other external factors such as unemployment, to determine how consumer loans are performing.

24

Table of Contents                             

Following is a table showing consumer loans by payment status:
TABLE 4.9
 
Consumer Loan Credit Quality
by Payment Status
(in millions)
Performing
 
Non-
Performing
 
Total
Originated Loans
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
Direct installment
$
1,643

 
$
14

 
$
1,657

Residential mortgages
2,740

 
15

 
2,755

Indirect installment
1,948

 
2

 
1,950

Consumer lines of credit
1,101

 
5

 
1,106

Total originated consumer loans
$
7,432

 
$
36

 
$
7,468

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
Direct installment
$
1,654

 
$
14

 
$
1,668

Residential mortgages
2,598

 
14

 
2,612

Indirect installment
1,931

 
2

 
1,933

Consumer lines of credit
1,114

 
5

 
1,119

Total originated consumer loans
$
7,297

 
$
35

 
$
7,332

Loans Acquired in a Business Combination
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
Direct installment
$
87

 
$

 
$
87

Residential mortgages
478

 

 
478

Consumer lines of credit
439

 
1

 
440

Total consumer loans acquired in a business combination
$
1,004

 
$
1

 
$
1,005

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
Direct installment
$
96

 
$

 
$
96

Residential mortgages
501

 

 
501

Consumer lines of credit
462

 
1

 
463

Total consumer loans acquired in a business combination
$
1,059

 
$
1

 
$
1,060


Loans are designated as impaired when, in the opinion of management, based on current information and events, the collection of principal and interest in accordance with the loan and lease contract is doubtful. Typically, we do not consider loans for impairment unless a sustained period of delinquency (i.e., 90-plus days) is noted or there are subsequent events that impact repayment probability (i.e., negative financial trends, bankruptcy filings, imminent foreclosure proceedings, etc.). Effective July 1, 2018, we changed our threshold for measuring impairment on a collective basis.  Impairment is evaluated in the aggregate for consumer installment loans, residential mortgages, consumer lines of credit and commercial loan relationships less than $1.0 million based on loan segment loss given default. For commercial loan relationships greater than or equal to $1.0 million, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using a market interest rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the sale of the collateral. Consistent with our existing method of income recognition for loans, interest income on impaired loans, except those classified as non-accrual, is recognized using the accrual method. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.

25

Table of Contents                             

Following is a summary of information pertaining to loans and leases considered to be impaired, by class of loan and lease:
TABLE 4.10
(in millions)
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
 
Recorded
Investment
With No
Specific
Reserve
 
Recorded
Investment
With
Specific
Reserve
 
Total
Recorded
Investment
 
Specific
Reserve
 
Average
Recorded
Investment
At or for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
24

 
$
18

 
$
3

 
$
21

 
$

 
$
20

Commercial and industrial
44

 
17

 
9

 
26

 
6

 
31

Commercial leases
2

 
2

 

 
2

 

 
2

Total commercial loans and leases
70

 
37

 
12

 
49

 
6

 
53

Direct installment
17

 
14

 

 
14

 

 
14

Residential mortgages
16

 
15

 

 
15

 

 
15

Indirect installment
4

 
2

 

 
2

 

 
2

Consumer lines of credit
7

 
5

 

 
5

 

 
5

Total consumer loans
44

 
36

 

 
36

 

 
36

Total
$
114

 
$
73

 
$
12

 
$
85

 
$
6

 
$
89

At or for the Year Ended
December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
20

 
$
16

 
$
1

 
$
17

 
$

 
$
18

Commercial and industrial
46

 
20

 
13

 
33

 
4

 
32

Commercial leases
2

 
2

 

 
2

 

 
4

Total commercial loans and leases
68

 
38

 
14

 
52

 
4

 
54

Direct installment
17

 
14

 

 
14

 

 
14

Residential mortgages
16

 
14

 

 
14

 

 
15

Indirect installment
5

 
2

 

 
2

 

 
2

Consumer lines of credit
7

 
5

 

 
5

 

 
5

Total consumer loans
45

 
35

 

 
35

 

 
36

Total
$
113

 
$
73

 
$
14

 
$
87

 
$
4

 
$
90



26

Table of Contents                             

Interest income continued to accrue on certain impaired loans and totaled approximately $1.4 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The above tables include one loan acquired in a business combination with a specific reserve at December 31, 2018.
Following is a summary of the allowance for credit losses required for loans acquired in a business combination due to changes in credit quality subsequent to the acquisition date:
TABLE 4.11
(in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Commercial real estate
$
2

 
$
2

Commercial and industrial
5

 
4

Total commercial loans
7

 
6

Direct installment
1

 
1

Residential mortgages
1

 

Total consumer loans
2

 
1

Total allowance on loans acquired in a business combination
$
9

 
$
7


Troubled Debt Restructurings
TDRs are loans whose contractual terms have been modified in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. TDRs typically result from loss mitigation activities and could include the extension of a maturity date, interest rate reduction, principal forgiveness, deferral or decrease in payments for a period of time and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral.
Following is a summary of the composition of total TDRs:
TABLE 4.12
(in millions)
Originated
 
Acquired
 
Total
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
Accruing:
 
 
 
 
 
Performing
$
18

 
$

 
$
18

Non-performing
16

 
4

 
20

Non-accrual
9

 
1

 
10

Total TDRs
$
43

 
$
5

 
$
48

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
Accruing:
 
 
 
 
 
Performing
$
18

 
$

 
$
18

Non-performing
17

 
4

 
21

Non-accrual
9

 

 
9

Total TDRs
$
44

 
$
4

 
$
48


TDRs that are accruing and performing include loans that met the criteria for non-accrual of interest prior to restructuring for which we can reasonably estimate the timing and amount of the expected cash flows on such loans and for which we expect to fully collect the new carrying value of the loans. During the three months ended March 31, 2019, we returned to performing status $1.3 million in restructured residential mortgage loans that have consistently met their modified obligations for more than six months. TDRs that are accruing and non-performing are comprised of consumer loans that have not demonstrated a consistent repayment pattern on the modified terms for more than six months, however it is expected that we will collect all future principal and interest payments. TDRs that are on non-accrual are not placed on accruing status until all delinquent principal and interest have been paid and the ultimate collectability of the remaining principal and interest is reasonably

27

Table of Contents                             

assured. Some loan modifications classified as TDRs may not ultimately result in the full collection of principal and interest, as modified, and may result in potential incremental losses which are factored into the allowance for credit losses.
Excluding purchased credit impaired loans, commercial loans over $1.0 million whose terms have been modified in a TDR are generally placed on non-accrual, individually analyzed and measured for estimated impairment based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. Our allowance for credit losses included specific reserves for commercial TDRs and pooled reserves for individually impaired loans under $1.0 million based on loan segment loss given default. Our allowance for loan losses includes specific reserves for commercial TDRs of less than $0.5 million at March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and pooled reserves for individual loans of $0.9 million for those same respective periods, based on loan segment loss given default. Upon default, the amount of the recorded investment in the TDR in excess of the fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs, is generally considered a confirmed loss and is charged-off against the allowance for credit losses.
 

All other classes of loans whose terms have been modified in a TDR are pooled and measured for estimated impairment based on the expected net present value of the estimated future cash flows of the pool. Our allowance for credit losses included pooled reserves for these classes of loans of $3.9 million for March 31, 2019 and $4.0 million for December 31, 2018. Upon default of an individual loan, our charge-off policy is followed for that class of loan.
Following is a summary of TDR loans, by class:
TABLE 4.13
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
(dollars in millions)
Number
of
Contracts
 
Pre-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
 
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Commercial real estate
1

 
$

 
$

Commercial and industrial
12

 
1

 
1

Total commercial loans
13

 
1

 
1

Direct installment
18

 
1

 
1

Residential mortgages
3

 

 

Consumer lines of credit
8

 

 

Total consumer loans
29

 
1

 
1

Total
42

 
$
2

 
$
2

 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
(dollars in millions)
Number
of
Contracts
 
Pre-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
 
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Commercial real estate
1

 
$

 
$

Commercial and industrial
1

 
2

 
1

Total commercial loans
2

 
2

 
1

Direct installment
182

 
1

 
1

Residential mortgages
11

 
1

 
1

Indirect installment
9

 

 

Consumer lines of credit
21

 

 

Total consumer loans
223

 
2

 
2

Total
225

 
$
4

 
$
3


The year-to-date items in the above tables have been adjusted for loans that have been paid off and/or sold.

28

Table of Contents                             

Following is a summary of originated TDRs, by class, for which there was a payment default, excluding loans that have been paid off and/or sold. Default occurs when a loan is 90 days or more past due and is within 12 months of restructuring.
TABLE 4.14
 
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2019
(dollars in millions)
Number of
Contracts
 
Recorded
Investment
Commercial real estate
1

 
$

Commercial and industrial

 

Total commercial loans
1

 

Direct installment
2

 
$

Residential mortgages
1

 

Consumer lines of credit
2

 

Total consumer loans
5

 

Total
6

 
$


 
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2018
(dollars in millions)
Number of
Contracts
 
Recorded
Investment
Direct installment
45

 
$
1

Residential mortgages
4

 

Indirect installment
5

 

Consumer lines of credit
1

 

Total consumer loans
55

 
1

Total
55

 
$
1



NOTE 5.    ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The allowance for credit losses addresses credit losses inherent in the existing loan and lease portfolio and is presented as a reserve against loans and leases on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Loan and lease losses are charged off against the allowance for credit losses, with recoveries of amounts previously charged off credited to the allowance for credit losses. Provisions for credit losses are charged to operations based on management’s periodic evaluation of the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses. Following is a summary of changes in the allowance for credit losses, by loan and lease class:

29

Table of Contents                             

TABLE 5.1
(in millions)
Balance at
Beginning of
Period
 
Charge-
Offs
 
Recoveries
 
Net
Charge-
Offs
 
Provision
for Credit
Losses
 
Balance at
End of
Period
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
55

 
$
(1
)
 
$

 
$
(1
)
 
$
3

 
$
57

Commercial and industrial
49

 
(1
)
 
1

 

 
3

 
52

Commercial leases
8

 

 

 

 

 
8

Other
2

 
(1
)
 

 
(1
)
 
1

 
2

Total commercial loans and leases
114

 
(3
)
 
1

 
(2
)
 
7

 
119

Direct installment
14

 
(1
)
 

 
(1
)
 
(1
)
 
12

Residential mortgages
20

 

 

 

 
(1
)
 
19

Indirect installment
15

 
(3
)
 
1

 
(2
)
 
4

 
17

Consumer lines of credit
10

 

 

 

 

 
10

Total consumer loans
59

 
(4
)
 
1

 
(3
)
 
2

 
58

Total allowance on originated loans and leases
173

 
(7
)
 
2

 
(5
)
 
9

 
177

Purchased credit-impaired loans
1

 

 

 

 

 
1

Other loans acquired in a business combination
6

 
(3
)
 

 
(3
)
 
5

 
8

Total allowance on loans acquired in a business combination
7

 
(3
)
 

 
(3
)
 
5

 
9

Total allowance for credit losses
$
180

 
$
(10
)
 
$
2

 
$
(8
)
 
$
14

 
$
186


(in millions)
Balance at
Beginning of
Period
 
Charge-
Offs
 
Recoveries
 
Net
Charge-
Offs
 
Provision
for Credit
Losses
 
Balance at
End of
Period
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$
50

 
$

 
$
1

 
$
1

 
$
3

 
$
54

Commercial and industrial
52

 
(6
)
 
1

 
(5
)
 
6

 
53

Commercial leases
5

 

 

 

 
1

 
6

Other
2

 
(1
)
 

 
(1
)
 
1

 
2

Total commercial loans and leases
109

 
(7
)
 
2

 
(5
)
 
11

 
115

Direct installment
21

 
(3
)
 

 
(3
)
 
2

 
20

Residential mortgages
16

 

 

 

 
(1
)
 
15

Indirect installment
12

 
(3
)
 
1

 
(2
)
 
2

 
12

Consumer lines of credit
10

 

 

 

 

 
10

Total consumer loans
59

 
(6
)
 
1

 
(5
)
 
3

 
57

Total allowance on originated loans and leases
168

 
(13
)
 
3

 
(10
)
 
14

 
172

Purchased credit-impaired loans
1

 

 

 

 

 
1

Other loans acquired in a business combination
6

 

 

 

 

 
6

Total allowance on loans acquired in a business combination
7

 

 

 

 

 
7

Total allowance for credit losses
$
175

 
$
(13
)
 
$
3

 
$
(10
)
 
$
14

 
$
179




30

Table of Contents                             

Following is a summary of the individual and collective allowance for credit losses and corresponding loan and lease balances by class:
TABLE 5.2
 
Allowance
 
Loans and Leases Outstanding
(in millions)
Individually
Evaluated for
Impairment
 
Collectively
Evaluated for
Impairment
 
Loans and
Leases
 
Individually
Evaluated for
Impairment
 
Collectively
Evaluated for
Impairment
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$

 
$
57

 
$
6,412

 
$
7

 
$
6,405

Commercial and industrial
6

 
46

 
4,509

 
10

 
4,499

Commercial leases

 
8

 
374

 

 
374

Other

 
2

 
49

 

 
49

Total commercial loans and leases
6

 
113

 
11,344

 
17

 
11,327

Direct installment

 
12

 
1,657

 

 
1,657

Residential mortgages

 
19

 
2,755

 

 
2,755

Indirect installment

 
17

 
1,950

 

 
1,950

Consumer lines of credit

 
10

 
1,106

 

 
1,106

Total consumer loans

 
58

 
7,468

 

 
7,468

Total
$
6

 
$
171

 
$
18,812

 
$
17

 
$
18,795

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$

 
$
55

 
$
6,171

 
$
7

 
$
6,164

Commercial and industrial
4

 
49

 
4,140

 
11

 
4,129

Commercial leases

 
9

 
373

 

 
373

Other

 
2

 
46

 

 
46

Total commercial loans and leases
4

 
115

 
10,730

 
18

 
10,712

Direct installment

 
14

 
1,668

 

 
1,668

Residential mortgages

 
19

 
2,612

 

 
2,612

Indirect installment

 
15

 
1,933

 

 
1,933

Consumer lines of credit

 
10

 
1,119

 

 
1,119

Total consumer loans

 
58

 
7,332

 

 
7,332

Total
$
4

 
$
173

 
$
18,062

 
$
18

 
$
18,044



The above table excludes loans acquired in a business combination that were pooled into groups of loans for evaluating impairment.

NOTE 6.    LOAN SERVICING
Mortgage Loan Servicing
We retain the servicing rights on certain mortgage loans sold. The unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans serviced for others is listed below:
TABLE 6.1
(in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31, 2018
Mortgage loans sold with servicing retained
$
4,061

 
$
3,968





31

Table of Contents                             

The following table summarizes activity relating to mortgage loans sold with servicing retained:
TABLE 6.2
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(in millions)
2019
 
2018
Mortgage loans sold with servicing retained
$
177

 
$
237

Pretax gains resulting from above loan sales (1)
4

 
4

Mortgage servicing fees (1)
2

 
2


(1) Recorded in mortgage banking operations on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Following is a summary of the MSR activity:
TABLE 6.3
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(in millions)
2019
 
2018
Balance at beginning of period
$
37

 
$
29

Additions
2

 
3

Payoffs and curtailments
(1
)
 

Impairment charge
(1
)
 

Amortization
(1
)
 
(1
)
Balance at end of period
$
36

 
$
31

Fair value, beginning of period
$
41

 
$
32

Fair value, end of period
40

 
36


The fair value of MSRs is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions and is determined by estimating the present value of the asset’s future cash flows utilizing market-based prepayment rates, discount rates and other assumptions validated through comparison to trade information, industry surveys and with the use of independent third-party valuations. Changes in prepayment speed assumptions have the most significant impact on the fair value of MSRs. Generally, as interest rates decline, mortgage loan prepayments accelerate due to increased refinance activity, which results in a decrease in the fair value of the MSR and as interest rates increase, mortgage loan prepayments decline, which results in an increase in the fair value of the MSR. Measurement of fair value is limited to the conditions existing and the assumptions utilized as of a particular point in time, and those assumptions may not be appropriate if they are applied at a different time.

32

Table of Contents                             

Following is a summary of the sensitivity of the fair value of MSRs to changes in key assumptions:
TABLE 6.4
(dollars in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Weighted average life (months)
79.4

 
82.2

Constant prepayment rate (annualized)
10.4
%
 
10.1
%
Discount rate
9.7
%
 
9.7
%
Effect on fair value due to change in interest rates:
 
 
 
+0.25%
$
2

 
$
3

+0.50%
5

 
5

-0.25%
(2
)
 
(3
)
-0.50%
(5
)
 
(6
)

The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. Changes in fair value based on adverse changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the changes in assumptions to fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effects of an adverse variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the MSRs is calculated without changing any other assumptions, while in reality, changes in one factor may result in changing another, which may magnify or contract the effect of the change. We had a $1.8 million valuation allowance for MSRs as of March 31, 2019, with $1.3 million added during the first quarter of 2019.
SBA-Guaranteed Loan Servicing
We retain the servicing rights on SBA-guaranteed loans sold to investors. The standard sale structure under the SBA Secondary Participation Guaranty Agreement provides for us to retain a portion of the cash flow from the interest payment received on the loan, which is commonly known as a servicing spread. The unpaid principal balance of SBA-guaranteed loans serviced for investors was as follows:
TABLE 6.5
(in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
SBA loans sold to investors with servicing retained
$
264

 
$
283

The following table summarizes activity relating to SBA loans sold with servicing retained:
TABLE 6.6
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(in millions)
2019
 
2018
SBA loans sold with servicing retained
$
6

 
$
12

Pretax gains resulting from above loan sales (1)

 
1

SBA servicing fees (1)
1

 
1

(1) Recorded in non-interest income.

33

Table of Contents                             

Following is a summary of the activity in SBA servicing rights:
TABLE 6.7
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(in millions)
2019
 
2018
Balance at beginning of period
$
4

 
$
5

Balance at end of period
$
4

 
$
5

Fair value, beginning of period
$
4

 
$
5

Fair value, end of period
4

 
5


Following is a summary of key assumptions and the sensitivity of the SBA servicing rights to changes in these assumptions. The declines in fair values were immaterial in the scenarios presented.
TABLE 6.8
 
March 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
 
 
Decline in fair value due to
 
 
 
Decline in fair value due to
(dollars in millions)
Actual
 
10% adverse change
 
20% adverse change
 
1% adverse change
 
2% adverse change
 
Actual
 
10% adverse change
 
20% adverse change
 
1% adverse change
 
2% adverse change
Weighted-average life (months)
49.8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
52.2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Constant prepayment rate (annualized)
13.3
%
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
12.5
%
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Discount rate
17.5

 

 

 

 

 
19.4

 

 

 

 


The fair value of the SBA servicing rights is compared to the amortized basis. If the amortized basis exceeds the fair value, the asset is considered impaired and is written down to fair value through a valuation allowance on the asset and a charge against SBA income. We had a $0.8 million valuation allowance for SBA servicing rights as of March 31, 2019.

NOTE 7.    OPERATING LEASES

We have operating leases for certain branches, office space, land, and office equipment. Our operating leases expire at various dates through the year 2046 and generally include one or more options to renew. The exercise of a lease renewal options is at our sole discretion. As of March 31, 2019, we had operating lease right-of-use assets and operating leases liabilities of $111.9 million and $121.3 million, respectively.
Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments based on a percentage of transactions and others include rental payments that periodically adjust to rates and charges stated in the agreements. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

As of March 31, 2019, we have certain operating lease agreements, primarily for administrative office space, that have not yet commenced. At commencement, it is expected that these leases will add approximately $42 million in right-of-use assets and other liabilities. These operating leases will commence between 2019 and 2020 with lease terms of 12 years to 16 years.



34

Table of Contents                             

The components of lease expense were as follows:
TABLE 7.1
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(dollars in millions)
2019
Operating lease cost
$
7

Short-term lease cost

Variable lease cost
1

Sublease income

Total lease cost
$
8


Other information related to leases is as follows:
TABLE 7.2
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(dollars in millions)
2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
 
Operating cash flows from operating leases
$
7

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations:
 
Operating leases
1

Weighted average remaining lease term (years):
 
Operating leases
8.86

Weighted average discount rate:
 
Operating leases
3.1
%

Maturities of operating lease liabilities were as follows:
TABLE 7.3
(in millions)
March 31,
2019
2019
$
19

2020
22

2021
19

2022
14

2023
11

Later years
53

Total lease payments
138

Less: Interest
(17
)
Present value of lease liabilities
$
121




35

Table of Contents                             

As a lessor we offer commercial leasing services to customers in need of new or used equipment primarily within our market areas of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina and West Virginia. Additional information relating to commercial leasing is provided in Note 4, “Loans and Leases” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTE 8.    BORROWINGS
Following is a summary of short-term borrowings:
TABLE 8.1
(in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
$
239

 
$
251

Federal Home Loan Bank advances
1,805

 
2,230

Federal funds purchased
1,957

 
1,535

Subordinated notes
110

 
113

Total short-term borrowings
$
4,111

 
$
4,129


Borrowings with original maturities of one year or less are classified as short-term. Securities sold under repurchase agreements are comprised of customer repurchase agreements, which are sweep accounts with next day maturities utilized by larger commercial customers to earn interest on their funds. Securities are pledged to these customers in an amount equal to the outstanding balance. Of the total short-term FHLB advances, 41.6% and 57.2% had overnight maturities as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. At March 31, 2019, 58.4% of the short-term FHLB advances were swapped to a fixed rate with maturities ranging from 2020 through 2024. This compares to 42.8% as of December 31, 2018.
Following is a summary of long-term borrowings:
TABLE 8.2
(in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
$
235

 
$
270

Subordinated notes
88

 
87

Junior subordinated debt
101

 
111

Other subordinated debt
249

 
159

Total long-term borrowings
$
673

 
$
627


Our banking affiliate has available credit with the FHLB of $7.4 billion, of which $2.0 billion was utilized as of March 31, 2019. These advances are secured by loans collateralized by residential mortgages, home equity lines of credit, commercial real estate and FHLB stock and are scheduled to mature in various amounts periodically through the year 2021. Effective interest rates paid on the long-term advances ranged from 1.62% to 4.19% for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 1.11% to 4.19% for the year ended December 31, 2018.
During the first quarter of 2019, we completed a debt offering in which we issued $120.0 million aggregate principal amount of fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due in 2029. The net proceeds of the debt offering after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering costs were $118.2 million. This other subordinated debt is eligible for treatment as tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes. Also, we repurchased and retired $9.5 million and redeemed $15.5 million in higher interest rate other subordinated debt assumed in the 2017 YDKN acquisition.
The junior subordinated debt is comprised of the debt securities issued by FNB in relation to our unconsolidated subsidiary trusts (collectively, the Trusts), which are unconsolidated variable interest entities, and are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in long-term borrowings. Since third-party investors are the primary beneficiaries, the Trusts are not consolidated in our Financial Statements. We record the distributions on the junior subordinated debt issued to the Trusts as interest expense.

36

Table of Contents                             

The following table provides information relating to the Trusts as of March 31, 2019:
TABLE 8.3
(dollars in millions)
Trust
Preferred
Securities
 
Common
Securities
 
Junior
Subordinated
Debt
 
Stated
Maturity
Date
 
Interest Rate
 

Rate Reset Factor
F.N.B. Statutory Trust II
$
22

 
$
1

 
$
22

 
6/15/2036
 
4.26
%
 
LIBOR + 165 basis points (bps)
Omega Financial Capital Trust I
26

 
1

 
27

 
10/18/2034
 
4.97
%
 
LIBOR + 219 bps
Yadkin Valley Statutory Trust I
25

 
1

 
21

 
12/15/2037
 
3.93
%
 
LIBOR + 132 bps
FNB Financial Services Capital Trust I
25

 
1

 
22

 
9/30/2035
 
4.05
%
 
LIBOR + 146 bps
Crescent Financial Capital Trust I
8

 

 
9

 
10/7/2033
 
5.89
%
 
LIBOR + 310 bps
Total
$
106

 
$
4

 
$
101

 
 
 
 
 
 


During the first quarter of 2019, we redeemed $10.0 million of TPS issued by American Community Capital Trust I and assumed in the 2017 YDKN acquisition.

NOTE 9.    DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
We are exposed to certain risks arising from both our business operations and economic conditions. We principally manage our exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of our core business activities. We manage economic risks, including interest rate risk, primarily by managing the amount, source, and duration of our assets and liabilities, and through the use of derivative instruments. Derivative instruments are used to reduce the effects that changes in interest rates may have on net income and cash flows. We also use derivative instruments to facilitate transactions on behalf of our customers.
All derivatives are carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value and do not take into account the effects of master netting arrangements we have with other financial institutions. Credit risk is included in the determination of the estimated fair value of derivatives. Derivative assets are reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in other assets and derivative liabilities are reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in other liabilities. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings except for certain changes related to derivative instruments designated as part of a cash flow hedging relationship.

37

Table of Contents                             

The following table presents notional amounts and gross fair values of our derivative assets and derivative liabilities which are not offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
TABLE 9.1
 
March 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
Notional
 
Fair Value
 
Notional
 
Fair Value
(in millions)
Amount
 
Asset
 
Liability
 
Amount
 
Asset
 
Liability
Gross Derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subject to master netting arrangements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts – designated
$
1,255

 
$

 
$
1

 
$
1,155

 
$

 
$
3

Interest rate swaps – not designated
2,917

 
1

 
16

 
2,740

 
2

 
10

Equity contracts – not designated

 

 

 
1

 

 

Total subject to master netting arrangements
4,172

 
1

 
17

 
3,896

 
2

 
13

Not subject to master netting arrangements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps – not designated
2,917

 
72

 
12

 
2,740

 
40

 
26

Interest rate lock commitments – not designated
83

 
2

 

 
47

 
1

 

Forward delivery commitments – not designated
101

 

 
1

 
55

 

 

Credit risk contracts – not designated
203

 

 

 
203

 

 

Equity contracts – not designated

 

 

 
1

 

 

Total not subject to master netting arrangements
3,304

 
74

 
13

 
3,046

 
41

 
26

Total
$
7,476

 
$
75

 
$
30

 
$
6,942

 
$
43

 
$
39


Certain derivative exchanges have enacted a rule change which in effect results in the legal characterization of variation margin payments for certain derivative contracts as settlement of the derivatives mark-to-market exposure and not collateral. The variation margin for certain derivative instruments cleared through a central clearing house results in the legal characterization of a settled transaction.  The daily settlement of the derivative exposure does not change or reset the contractual terms of the instrument.
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments under GAAP
Interest Rate Contracts. We entered into interest rate derivative agreements to modify the interest rate characteristics of certain commercial loans and certain of our FHLB advances from variable rate to fixed rate in order to reduce the impact of changes in future cash flows due to market interest rate changes. These agreements are designated as cash flow hedges hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows. The derivative’s gain or loss, including any ineffectiveness, is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. Prior to 2019, any ineffective portion of the gain or loss was reported in earnings immediately.
The following table shows amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income:
TABLE 9.2
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives
 
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(in millions)
2019
 
2018
 
 
 
2019
 
2018
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Interest rate contracts
$
(8
)
 
$
5

 
Interest income (expense)
 
$
1

 
$



38

Table of Contents                             

The following table represents gains (losses) recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income on cash flow hedging relationships:
TABLE 9.3
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
(in millions)
 
Interest Income - Loans and Leases
 
Interest Expense - Short-Term Borrowings
 
Interest Income - Loans and Leases
 
Interest Expense - Short-Term Borrowings
Total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income in which the effects of cash flow hedges are recorded
 
$
269

 
$
26

 
$
239

 
$
15

The effects of cash flow hedging:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Interest contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
        Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into net income
 

 
1

 

 

        Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income as a
        result of that a forecasted transaction is no longer probable of
        occurring
 

 

 

 


As of March 31, 2019, the maximum length of time over which forecasted interest cash flows are hedged is 6 years. In the twelve months that follow March 31, 2019, we expect to reclassify from the amount currently reported in AOCI net derivative gains of $1.8 million ($1.4 million net of tax), in association with interest on the hedged loans and FHLB advances. This amount could differ from amounts actually recognized due to changes in interest rates, hedge de-designations, and the addition of other hedges subsequent to March 31, 2019.
There were no components of derivative gains or losses excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness related to these cash flow hedges. Also, during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, there were no gains or losses from cash flow hedge derivatives reclassified to earnings because it became probable that the original forecasted transactions would not occur.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under GAAP
A description of interest rate swaps, interest rate lock commitments, forward delivery commitments and credit risk contracts can be found in Note 14 "Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" in the Consolidated Financial Statements of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019.
The interest rate swap agreement with the loan customer and with the counterparty is reported at fair value in other assets and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period earnings as other income or other expense.
Risk participation agreements sold with notional amounts totaling $138.5 million as of March 31, 2019 have remaining terms ranging from six months to nine years. Under these agreements, our maximum exposure assuming a customer defaults on their obligation to perform under certain derivative swap contracts with third parties would be $0.1 million at March 31, 2019 and $0.1 million at December 31, 2018. The fair values of risk participation agreements purchased and sold were $0.06 million and $0.1 million, respectively, at March 31, 2019 and $0.05 million and $(0.1) million, respectively at December 31, 2018.

39

Table of Contents                             

The following table presents the effect of certain derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income:
TABLE 9.4
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(in millions)
Consolidated Statements of Income Location
 
2019
 
2018
Interest rate swaps
Non-interest income - other
 
$

 
$

Interest rate lock commitments
Mortgage banking operations
 

 

Forward delivery contracts
Mortgage banking operations
 
(1
)
 
1

Credit risk contracts
Non-interest income - other
 

 


Counterparty Credit Risk
We are party to master netting arrangements with most of our swap derivative dealer counterparties. Collateral, usually marketable securities and/or cash, is exchanged between FNB and our counterparties, and is generally subject to thresholds and transfer minimums. For swap transactions that require central clearing, we post cash to our clearing agency. Collateral positions are settled or valued daily, and adjustments to amounts received and pledged by us are made as appropriate to maintain proper collateralization for these transactions.
Certain master netting agreements contain provisions that, if violated, could cause the counterparties to request immediate settlement or demand full collateralization under the derivative instrument. If we had breached our agreements with our derivative counterparties we would be required to settle our obligations under the agreements at the termination value and would be required to pay an additional $0.4 million and $0.7 million as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, in excess of amounts previously posted as collateral with the respective counterparty.

40

Table of Contents                             

The following table presents a reconciliation of the net amounts of derivative assets and derivative liabilities presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets to the net amounts that would result in the event of offset:
TABLE 9.5
 
 
 
Amount Not Offset in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 
(in millions)
Net Amount
Presented in
the Consolidated Balance
Sheets
 
Financial
Instruments
 
Cash
Collateral
 
Net
Amount
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Not designated
$
1

 
$
1

 
$

 
$

Total
$
1

 
$
1

 
$

 
$


Derivative Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Designated
$
1

 
$
1

 
$

 
$

Not designated
16

 
16

 

 

Total
$
17

 
$
17

 
$

 
$


December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Not designated
$
2

 
$
2

 
$

 
$

Total
$
2

 
$
2

 
$

 
$


Derivative Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Designated
$
3

 
$
3

 
$

 
$

Not designated
10

 
9

 

 
1

Total
$
13

 
$
12

 
$

 
$
1



NOTE 10.    COMMITMENTS, CREDIT RISK AND CONTINGENCIES
We have commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit that involve certain elements of credit risk in excess of the amount stated in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the customer is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The credit risk associated with commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans and leases to customers and is subject to normal credit policies. Since many of these commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements.
Following is a summary of off-balance sheet credit risk information:
TABLE 10.1
(in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
Commitments to extend credit
$
8,071

 
$
7,378

Standby letters of credit
136

 
126



41

Table of Contents                             

At March 31, 2019, funding of 73.8% of the commitments to extend credit was dependent on the financial condition of the customer. We have the ability to withdraw such commitments at our discretion. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer, collateral may be deemed necessary. Collateral requirements vary and may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us that may require payment at a future date. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is actively monitored through review of the historical performance of our portfolios.
In addition to the above commitments, subordinated notes issued by FNB Financial Services, LP, a wholly-owned finance subsidiary, are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by FNB. These subordinated notes are included in the summaries of short-term borrowings and long-term borrowings in Note 8.
Other Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, we are routinely named as defendants in, or made parties to, pending and potential legal actions. Also, as regulated entities, we are subject to governmental and regulatory examinations, information-gathering requests, and may be subject to investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal). Such threatened claims, litigation, investigations, regulatory and administrative proceedings typically entail matters that are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business. Claims for significant monetary damages may be asserted in many of these types of legal actions, while claims for disgorgement, restitution, penalties and/or other remedial actions or sanctions may be sought in regulatory matters. In these instances, if we determine that we have meritorious defenses, we will engage in an aggressive defense. However, if management determines, in consultation with counsel, that settlement of a matter is in the best interest of our Company and our shareholders, we may do so. It is inherently difficult to predict the eventual outcomes of such matters given their complexity and the particular facts and circumstances at issue in each of these matters. However, on the basis of current knowledge and understanding, and advice of counsel, we do not believe that judgments, sanctions, settlements or orders, if any, that may arise from these matters (either individually or in the aggregate, after giving effect to applicable reserves and insurance coverage) will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or liquidity, although they could have a material effect on net income in a given period.
In view of the inherent unpredictability of outcomes in litigation and governmental and regulatory matters, particularly where (i) the damages sought are indeterminate, (ii) the proceedings are in the early stages, or (iii) the matters involve novel legal theories or a large number of parties, as a matter of course, there is considerable uncertainty surrounding the timing or ultimate resolution of litigation and governmental and regulatory matters, including a possible eventual loss, fine, penalty, business or adverse reputational impact, if any, associated with each such matter. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we establish accruals for litigation and governmental and regulatory matters when those matters proceed to a stage where they present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. In such cases, there may be a possible exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. We will continue to monitor such matters for developments that could affect the amount of the accrual, and will adjust the accrual amount as appropriate. If the loss contingency in question is not both probable and reasonably estimable, we do not establish an accrual and the matter will continue to be monitored for any developments that would make the loss contingency both probable and reasonably estimable. We believe that our accruals for legal proceedings are appropriate and, in the aggregate, are not material to our consolidated financial position, although future accruals could have a material effect on net income in a given period.

NOTE 11.    STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
Restricted Stock
We issue restricted stock awards to key employees under our Incentive Compensation Plan (Plan). We issue time-based awards and performance-based awards under this Plan, both of which are based on a three-year vesting period. The grant date fair value of the time-based awards is equal to the price of our common stock on the grant date. The fair value of the performance-based awards is based on a Monte-Carlo simulation valuation of our common stock as of the grant date. The assumptions used for this valuation include stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. As of March 31, 2019, we had available up to 2,037,154 shares of common stock to issue under this Plan.
 
 
 

The unvested restricted stock unit awards are eligible to receive cash dividends or dividend equivalents which are ultimately used to purchase additional shares of stock and are subject to forfeiture if the requisite service period is not completed or the

42

Table of Contents                             

specified performance criteria are not met. These awards are subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions upon retirement, death, disability or in the event of a change of control as defined in the award agreements.
The following table summarizes the activity relating to restricted stock units during the periods indicated:
TABLE 11.1
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
Units
 
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price per
Share
 
Units
 
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price per
Share
Unvested units outstanding at beginning of period
2,556,174

 
$
13.51

 
1,975,862

 
$
13.64

Vested
(295,616
)
 
13.28

 
(7,631
)
 
12.83

Forfeited/expired
(10,442
)
 
13.66

 
(19,893
)
 
14.02

Dividend reinvestment
22,701

 
11.91

 
16,373

 
14.37

Unvested units outstanding at end of period
2,272,817

 
13.52

 
1,964,711

 
13.65


The following table provides certain information related to restricted stock units:
TABLE 11.2
(in millions)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
2019
 
2018
Stock-based compensation expense
$
2

 
$
2

Fair value of units vested
3

 


As of March 31, 2019, there was $11.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock units, including $0.6 million that is subject to accelerated vesting under the Plan’s immediate vesting upon retirement. The components of the restricted stock units as of March 31, 2019 are as follows:
TABLE 11.3
(dollars in millions)
Service-
Based
Units
 
Performance-
Based
Units
 
Total
Unvested restricted stock units
1,470,391

 
802,426

 
2,272,817

Unrecognized compensation expense
$
8

 
$
3

 
$
11

Intrinsic value
$
16

 
$
9

 
$
25

Weighted average remaining life (in years)
1.73

 
1.69

 
1.72


Stock Options
All outstanding stock options were assumed from acquisitions and are fully vested. Upon consummation of our acquisitions, all outstanding stock options issued by the acquired companies were converted into equivalent FNB stock options. We issue shares of treasury stock or authorized but unissued shares to satisfy stock options exercised.

43

Table of Contents                             

The following table summarizes the activity relating to stock options during the periods indicated:
TABLE 11.4 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price per
 Share
 
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price per
 Share
Options outstanding at beginning of period
458,354

 
$
7.99

 
722,650

 
$
7.96

Exercised
(34,432
)
 
7.86

 
(163,035
)
 
7.79

Forfeited/expired
(1,421
)
 
7.64

 
(237
)
 
10.72

Options outstanding and exercisable at end of period
422,501

 
8.00

 
559,378

 
8.03


The intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable stock options at March 31, 2019 was $1.1 million. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the amount by which the fair value of underlying stock exceeds the option exercise price.

NOTE 12.      INCOME TAXES
Income Tax Expense
Federal and state income tax expense and the statutory tax rate and the actual effective tax rate consist of the following:
TABLE 12.1
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(in millions)
2019
 
2018
Current income taxes:
 
 
 
Federal taxes
$
18

 
$
17

State taxes
2

 
2

Total current income taxes
20

 
19

Deferred income taxes:
 
 
 
Federal taxes
2

 
2

Total deferred income taxes
2

 
2

Total income taxes
$
22

 
$
21

Statutory tax rate
21.0
%
 
21.0
%
Effective tax rate
19.3
%
 
19.7
%

The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018 was lower than the statutory tax rate of 21% due to tax benefits resulting from tax-exempt income on investments, loans, tax credits and income from BOLI.
Deferred Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured based on the enacted tax rates that will apply in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or paid. Net deferred tax assets were $60.5 million and $67.5 million at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.


44

Table of Contents                             

NOTE 13.    OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following table presents changes in AOCI, net of tax, by component:
TABLE 13.1
(in millions)
Unrealized
Net Losses on
Debt Securities
Available
for Sale
 
Unrealized
Net Gains
(Losses) on
Derivative
Instruments
 
Unrecognized
Pension and
Postretirement
Obligations
 
Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
$
(46
)
 
$
1

 
$
(61
)
 
$
(106
)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
24

 
(6
)
 
1

 
19

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 
(1
)
 

 
(1
)
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income
24

 
(7
)
 
1

 
18

Balance at end of period
$
(22
)
 
$
(6
)
 
$
(60
)
 
$
(88
)

The amounts reclassified from AOCI related to debt securities AFS are included in net securities gains on the Consolidated Statements of Income, while the amounts reclassified from AOCI related to derivative instruments are included in interest income on loans and leases on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The tax (benefit) expense amounts reclassified from AOCI in connection with the debt securities AFS and derivative instruments reclassifications are included in income taxes on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

NOTE 14.    EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding net of unvested shares of restricted stock.
Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, adjusted for the dilutive effect of potential common shares issuable for stock options, warrants and restricted shares, as calculated using the treasury stock method. Adjustments to the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding are made only when such adjustments dilute earnings per common share.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share:
TABLE 14.1
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(dollars in millions, except per share data)
2019
 
2018
Net income
$
94

 
$
87

Less: Preferred stock dividends
2

 
2

Net income available to common stockholders
$
92

 
$
85

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
324,640,715

 
323,740,956

Net effect of dilutive stock options, warrants and restricted stock
1,188,119

 
2,026,012

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
325,828,834

 
325,766,968

Earnings per common share:
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.28

 
$
0.26

Diluted
$
0.28

 
$
0.26



45

Table of Contents                             

The following table shows the average shares excluded from the above calculation as their effect would have been anti-dilutive: 
TABLE 14.2
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
2019
 
2018
Average shares excluded from the diluted earnings per common share calculation
189

 
21



NOTE 15.    CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Following is a summary of supplemental cash flow information:
TABLE 15.1
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
2019
 
2018
(in millions)
 
 
 
Interest paid on deposits and other borrowings
$
77

 
$
47

Transfers of loans to other real estate owned
2

 
4



NOTE 16.    BUSINESS SEGMENTS
We operate in three reportable segments: Community Banking, Wealth Management and Insurance.
 
The Community Banking segment provides commercial and consumer banking services. Commercial banking solutions include corporate banking, small business banking, investment real estate financing, business credit, capital markets and lease financing. Consumer banking products and services include deposit products, mortgage lending, consumer lending and a complete suite of mobile and online banking services.
The Wealth Management segment provides a broad range of personal and corporate fiduciary services including the administration of decedent and trust estates. In addition, it offers various alternative products, including securities brokerage and investment advisory services, mutual funds and annuities.
The Insurance segment includes a full-service insurance agency offering all lines of commercial and personal insurance through major carriers. The Insurance segment also includes a reinsurer.
We also previously operated a Consumer Finance segment, which is no longer a reportable segment. This segment primarily made installment loans to individuals and purchased installment sales finance contracts from retail merchants. On August 31, 2018, as part of our strategy to enhance the overall positioning of our consumer banking operations, we sold 100 percent of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Regency to Mariner Finance, LLC. This transaction was completed to accomplish several strategic objectives, including enhancing the credit risk profile of the consumer loan portfolio, offering additional liquidity and selling a non-strategic business segment that no longer fits with our core business. Regency's financial information is included in the Consumer Finance segment in the 2018 table that follows.

46

Table of Contents                             

The following tables provide financial information for these segments of FNB. The information provided under the caption “Parent and Other” represents operations not considered to be reportable segments and/or general operating expenses of FNB, and includes the parent company, other non-bank subsidiaries and eliminations and adjustments to reconcile to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
TABLE 16.1
 
 
(in millions)
Community
Banking
 
Wealth
Management
 
Insurance
 
Consumer
Finance
 
Parent and
Other
 
Consolidated
At or for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income
$
310

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
310

Interest expense
76

 

 

 

 
3

 
79

Net interest income
234

 

 

 

 
(3
)
 
231

Provision for credit losses
14

 

 

 

 

 
14

Non-interest income
51

 
11

 
5

 

 
(2
)
 
65

Non-interest expense (1)
147

 
9

 
4

 

 
2

 
162

Amortization of intangibles
4

 

 

 

 

 
4

Income tax expense (benefit)
23

 

 

 

 
(1
)
 
22

Net income (loss)
97

 
2

 
1

 

 
(6
)
 
94

Total assets
33,598

 
27

 
25

 

 
45

 
33,695

Total intangibles
2,301

 
10

 
19

 

 

 
2,330

At or for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income
$
264

 
$

 
$

 
$
9

 
$

 
$
273

Interest expense
42

 

 

 
1

 
4

 
47

Net interest income
222

 

 

 
8

 
(4
)
 
226

Provision for credit losses
12

 

 

 
2

 

 
14

Non-interest income
53

 
11

 
4

 
1

 
(2
)
 
67

Non-interest expense (1)
149

 
8

 
4

 
5

 
1

 
167

Amortization of intangibles
4

 

 

 

 

 
4

Income tax expense (benefit)
22

 
1

 

 

 
(2
)
 
21

Net income (loss)
88

 
2

 

 
2

 
(5
)
 
87

Total assets
31,424

 
25

 
20

 
170

 
13

 
31,652

Total intangibles
2,315

 
10

 
12

 
2

 

 
2,339

(1) Excludes amortization of intangibles, which is presented separately.


47

Table of Contents                             

NOTE 17.    FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Refer to Note 24 "Fair Value Measurements" to the Consolidated Financial Statements of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019 for a description of additional valuation methodologies for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis.
The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
TABLE 17.1
(in millions)
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets Measured at Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities available for sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government agencies
$

 
$
181

 
$

 
$
181

U.S. government-sponsored entities

 
299

 

 
299

Residential mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency mortgage-backed securities

 
1,378

 

 
1,378

Agency collateralized mortgage obligations

 
1,298

 

 
1,298

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 
228

 

 
228

States of the U.S. and political subdivisions

 
17

 

 
17

Other debt securities

 
2

 

 
2

Total debt securities available for sale

 
3,403

 

 
3,403

Loans held for sale

 
25

 

 
25

Derivative financial instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading

 
73

 

 
73

Not for trading

 

 
2

 
2

Total derivative financial instruments

 
73

 
2

 
75

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis
$

 
$
3,501

 
$
2

 
$
3,503

Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading
$

 
$
28

 
$

 
$
28

Not for trading

 
2

 

 
2

Total derivative financial instruments

 
30

 

 
30

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
$

 
$
30

 
$

 
$
30



48

Table of Contents                             

(in millions)
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets Measured at Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities available for sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government agencies
$

 
$
187

 
$

 
$
187

U.S. government-sponsored entities

 
313

 

 
313

Residential mortgage-backed securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency mortgage-backed securities

 
1,429

 

 
1,429

Agency collateralized mortgage obligations

 
1,161

 

 
1,161

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 
228

 

 
228

States of the U.S. and political subdivisions

 
21

 

 
21

Other debt securities

 
2

 

 
2

Total debt securities available for sale

 
3,341

 

 
3,341

Loans held for sale

 
14

 

 
14

Derivative financial instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading

 
42

 
1

 
43

Total derivative financial instruments

 
42

 
1

 
43

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis
$

 
$
3,397

 
$
1

 
$
3,398

Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading
$

 
$
36

 
$

 
$
36

Not for trading

 
3

 

 
3

Total derivative financial instruments

 
39

 

 
39

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
$

 
$
39

 
$

 
$
39



The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which we have utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:
TABLE 17.2 
(in millions)
 
Interest
Rate
Lock
Commitments
 
Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
1

 
$
1

Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:
 
 
 
 
Purchases
 
2

 
2

Settlements
 
(1
)
 
(1
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
2

 
$
2

Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
2

 
$
2

Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:
 
 
 
 
Purchases
 
5

 
5

Settlements
 
(6
)
 
(6
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
1

 
$
1



49

Table of Contents                             

We review fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of the valuation attributes may result in reclassification of certain financial assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers in/out of Level 3 at fair value at the beginning of the period in which the changes occur. There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between the hierarchy levels during the first three months of 2019 or 2018.
In accordance with GAAP, from time to time, we measure certain assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of the lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets. Valuation methodologies used to measure these fair value adjustments were described in Note 24 "Fair Value Measurements" in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis still held at the Balance Sheet date, the following table provides the hierarchy level and the fair value of the related assets or portfolios:
TABLE 17.3
(in millions)
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impaired loans
$

 
$

 
$
8

 
$
8

Other real estate owned

 

 
1

 
1

Other assets - SBA servicing asset

 

 
4

 
4

Other assets - MSR

 

 
23

 
23

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impaired loans
$

 
$

 
$
15

 
$
15

Other real estate owned

 

 
5

 
5

Other assets - SBA servicing asset

 

 
4

 
4


Substantially all of the fair value amounts in the table above were estimated at a date during the three months or twelve months ended March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Consequently, the fair value information presented is not necessarily as of the period’s end. MSRs measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis with a carrying amount of $24.6 million had a valuation allowance of $1.3 million included in earnings, bringing the March 31, 2019 carrying value to $23.2 million.
Impaired loans measured or re-measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2019 had a carrying amount of $7.5 million, which includes an allocated allowance for credit losses of $5.8 million. The allowance for credit losses includes a provision applicable to the current period fair value measurements of $3.2 million, which was included in the provision for credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2019.
OREO with a carrying amount of $1.3 million was written down to $1.1 million, resulting in a loss of $0.2 million, which was included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2019.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Refer to Note 24 "Fair Value Measurements" to the Consolidated Financial Statements of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019 for a description of methods and assumptions that were used to estimate the fair value of each financial instrument.

50

Table of Contents                             

The fair values of our financial instruments are as follows:
TABLE 17.4
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements
(in millions)
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
 Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
497

 
$
497

 
$
497

 
$

 
$

Debt securities available for sale
3,403

 
3,403

 

 
3,403

 

Debt securities held to maturity
3,171

 
3,139

 

 
3,139

 

Net loans and leases, including loans held for sale
22,471

 
22,313

 

 
25

 
22,288

Loan servicing rights
40

 
44

 

 

 
44

Marketable equity securities

 

 

 

 

Derivative assets
75

 
75

 

 
73

 
2

Accrued interest receivable
111

 
111

 
111

 

 

Financial Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
23,882

 
23,859

 
18,390

 
5,469

 

Short-term borrowings
4,111

 
4,112

 
4,112

 

 

Long-term borrowings
673

 
670

 

 

 
670

Derivative liabilities
30

 
30

 

 
30

 

Accrued interest payable
23

 
23

 
23

 

 

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
488

 
$
488

 
$
488

 
$

 
$

Debt securities available for sale
3,341

 
3,341

 

 
3,341

 

Debt securities held to maturity
3,254

 
3,155

 

 
3,155

 

Net loans and leases, including loans held for sale
21,995

 
21,742

 

 
14

 
21,728

Loan servicing rights
41

 
45

 

 

 
45

Marketable equity securities

 

 

 

 

Derivative assets
43

 
43

 

 
42

 
1

Accrued interest receivable
101

 
101

 
101

 

 

Financial Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
23,455

 
23,411

 
18,142

 
5,269

 

Short-term borrowings
4,129

 
4,130

 
4,130

 

 

Long-term borrowings
627

 
618

 

 

 
618

Derivative liabilities
39

 
39

 

 
39

 

Accrued interest payable
20

 
20

 
20

 

 





51

Table of Contents                             

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MD&A represents an overview of and highlights material changes to our financial condition and results of operations at and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2019 and 2018. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto contained herein and our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019. Our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the full year.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
A number of statements in this Report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including our expectations relative to business and financial metrics, our outlook regarding revenues, expenses, earnings. liquidity, efficiency ratio, capital measures, asset quality, statements regarding the impact of technology enhancements and customer and business process improvements and future business and economic conditions and other future matters.
Where we express an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, our forward-looking statements may be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risk, uncertainties and unforeseen events which may cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by these forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and are based on information available at that time. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements were made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by federal securities laws. Further, it is not possible to assess the effect of all risk factors on our business to the extent to which any one risk factor or compilation thereof may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. As forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, caution should be exercised against placing undue reliance on such statements.
Such forward-looking statements may be expressed in a variety of ways, including the use of future and present tense language expressing expectations or predictions of future financial or business performance or conditions based on current performance and trends. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as, "believe," "plan," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "outlook," "estimate," "forecast," "will," "should," "project," "goal," and other similar words and expressions. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. In addition to factors previously disclosed in our reports filed with the SEC, the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements or historical performance:
changes in asset quality and credit risk and the possibility of future credit losses may be higher than currently expected due to changes in economic assumptions, customer behavior, adverse developments with respect to U.S. or global economic conditions and other uncertainties;
the inability to sustain revenue and earnings growth;
changes in interest rates, deposit costs and capital markets;
changes or errors in the methodologies, models, assumptions and estimates we use to prepare our financial statements, make business decisions and manage risks;
FNB's ability to achieve its expense targets and its expectations regarding net interest income, net charge-offs, loan and deposit growth and other projections;
inability to effectively grow and expand our customer bases;
our ability to execute on key priorities, including business retention, expansion plans, strategic plans and attracting, developing and retaining key executives;
potential difficulties encountered in operating in new and remote geographic markets;
customer borrowing, repayment, investment and deposit practices;
customer disintermediation;
the introduction, withdrawal, success and timing of business and technology initiatives;
economic conditions in the various regions in which we operate;
competitive conditions, including increased competition through internet, mobile banking, fintech, and other non-traditional competitors;

52

Table of Contents                             

the inability to originate and re-sell mortgage loans in accordance with business plans;
our inability to effectively manage our economic exposure and GAAP earnings exposure to interest rate volatility, including availability of appropriate derivative financial investments needed for interest rate risk management purposes;
impact of U.S. inflation rates and trade policy;
impact of U.S. interest rate environment on FNB's business, financial condition, and results of operations;
interruption in or breach of security of our information systems;
the failure of third parties and vendors to comply with their obligations to us, including related to care, control, and protection of such information;
the evolution of various types of fraud or other criminal behavior to which we are exposed;
integrity and functioning of products, information systems and services provided by third party external vendors;
changes in tax rules and regulations or interpretations including, but not limited to, the recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act or tariffs implemented by the U.S. President;
changes in or anticipated impact of, accounting policies, standards and interpretations;
ability to maintain adequate liquidity to fund our operations;
changes in asset valuations;
the initiation of significant legal or regulatory proceedings against us and the outcome of any significant legal or regulatory proceeding including, but not limited to, actions by federal or state authorities and class action cases, new decisions that result in changes to previously settled law or regulation, and any unexpected court or regulatory rulings;
the impact, extent and timing of technological changes, capital management activities, and other actions of the OCC, the FRB, the CFPB, the FDIC and legislative and regulatory actions and reforms; and
risks related to the discontinuation of LIBOR.
The risks identified here are not exclusive. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied as a result of these risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risk factors and other uncertainties described under Item 1A. Risk Factors of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K (including MD&A section), our subsequent 2019 Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q's (including the risk factors and risk management discussions) and our other subsequent filings with the SEC, which are available on our corporate website at https://www.fnb-online.com/about-us/investor-relations-shareholder-services. We have included our web address as an inactive textual reference only. Information on our website is not part of this Report.

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A description of our critical accounting policies is included in the MD&A section of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019 under the heading “Application of Critical Accounting Policies”. There have been no significant changes in critical accounting policies or the assumptions and judgments utilized in applying these policies since December 31, 2018.

USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
To supplement our Consolidated Financial Statements presented in accordance with GAAP, we use certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as operating net income available to common stockholders, operating earnings per diluted common share, return on average tangible common equity, return on average tangible assets, tangible book value per common share, the ratio of tangible equity to tangible assets, the ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets, efficiency ratio and net interest margin (FTE) to provide information useful to investors in understanding our operating performance and trends, and to facilitate comparisons with the performance of our peers. Management uses these measures internally to assess and better understand our underlying business performance and trends related to core business activities. The non-GAAP financial measures and key performance indicators we use may differ from the non-GAAP financial measures and key performance indicators other financial institutions use to assess their performance and trends.
These non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed as supplemental in nature, and not as a substitute for or superior to, our reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP. When non-GAAP financial measures are disclosed, the SEC's Regulation G requires: (i) the presentation of the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP and (ii) a reconciliation of the differences between the non-GAAP financial measure presented and the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of non-GAAP operating

53

Table of Contents                             

measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included later in this report under the heading “Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Indicators to GAAP”.
Management believes charges such as branch consolidation costs are not organic costs to run our operations and facilities. The branch consolidation charges principally represent expenses to satisfy contractual obligations of the closed branches without any useful ongoing benefit to us. These costs are specific to each individual transaction, and may vary significantly based on the size and complexity of the transaction.
To provide more meaningful comparisons of net interest margin and efficiency ratio, we use net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis in calculating net interest margin by increasing the interest income earned on tax-exempt assets (loans and investments) to make it fully equivalent to interest income earned on taxable investments (this adjustment is not permitted under GAAP).  Taxable-equivalent amounts for the 2019 and 2018 periods were calculated using a federal statutory income tax rate of 21%. 

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Net income available to common stockholders for the first quarter of 2019 was $92.1 million or $0.28 per diluted common share, compared to net income available to common stockholders for the first quarter of 2018 of $84.8 million or $0.26 per diluted common share. On an operating basis, first quarter of 2019 earnings per diluted common share (non-GAAP) was $0.29, excluding $1.6 million in branch consolidation costs. Operating earnings per diluted common share (non-GAAP) equaled reported results in the first quarter of 2018.
Income Statement Highlights (First quarter of 2019 compared to first quarter of 2018, except as noted)
 
Net income was $94.1 million, compared to $86.8 million.

Earnings per diluted common share were $0.28, compared to $0.26.
Operating earnings per diluted common share (non-GAAP) were $0.29, compared to $0.26.
Total revenue increased 0.8% to $296.0 million, reflecting a 2.0% increase in net interest income, partially offset by a 3.1% decrease in non-interest income.
Net interest income was $230.6 million, compared to $226.1 million.
Net interest margin (FTE) (non-GAAP) declined 13 basis points to 3.26% from 3.39%, primarily due to the sale of Regency in the third quarter of 2018. Regency contributed 12 basis points to net interest margin in the first quarter of 2018. The decline also reflected higher funding costs caused by four increases in benchmark interest rates during 2018 and increased deposit price competition, partially offset by a 4 basis point increase in the contribution from incremental purchase accounting accretion.
Non-interest income decreased $2.1 million, or 3.1%, including a $1.2 million loss on fixed assets related to branch consolidations. Capital markets income grew 15.8%, reflecting strong interest rate swap and international banking activity, while trust income grew 5.2%. Dividends on non-marketable equity securities increased $1.0 million to $5.0 million due to an increase in the FHLB dividend rate, while mortgage banking operations income declined primarily due to a $1.3 million interest rate-related valuation adjustment on mortgage servicing rights.
Non-interest expense was $165.7 million, compared to $171.1 million.
Non-interest expense decreased $4.0 million, or 2.3%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2018.
The efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) equaled 53.4%, compared to 55.8%.
The annualized net charge-offs to total average loans ratio decreased to 0.14%, compared to 0.20%.

54

Table of Contents                             

Balance Sheet Highlights (period-end balances, March 31, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018, unless otherwise indicated)
 
Total assets were $33.7 billion, compared to $33.1 billion, an increase of $593.0 million, or 1.8%.
Growth in total average loans was $1.2 billion, or 5.8%, with average commercial loan growth of $601.5 million, or 4.5%, and average consumer loan growth of $621.4 million, or 8.0%, from the same period last year.
Total average deposits grew $1.2 billion, or 5.6%, including an increase in average non-interest-bearing deposits of $285.1 million, or 5.1%, an increase in interest-bearing demand deposits of $263.0 million, or 2.8%, and an increase in average time deposits of $710.6 million, or 15.3%, from the same period last year.
We issued $120 million of 4.950% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due 2029.
The ratio of loans to deposits was 94.7%, compared to 94.4%.
Total stockholders’ equity was $4.7 billion, compared to $4.6 billion, an increase of $71.7 million, or 1.6%, since December 31, 2018, primarily driven by an increase in earnings and an improvement in AOCI. Additionally, the dividend payout ratio for the first quarter of 2019 was 42.6% compared to 40.0%%.
The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans and leases was 0.82%, compared to 0.81%.
Return on average tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP) of 17.38%, compared to 18.94%.
Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP) of $6.91, a 13% increase from the prior-year quarter.
Tangible common equity to tangible assets of 7.15%, a 37 basis point increase from the prior-year quarter.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Net income available to common stockholders for the three months ended March 31, 2019 was $92.1 million or $0.28 per diluted common share, compared to $84.8 million or $0.26 per diluted common share for the three months ended March 31, 2018. The first three months of 2019 included the impact of branch consolidation costs of $1.6 million. Of those costs, $0.5 million was included in non-interest expense and $1.2 million was reflected as a loss on fixed assets reducing non-interest income. Operating earnings per diluted common share (non-GAAP) was $0.29 for the first three months of 2019, compared to $0.26 for the three months ended March 31, 2018. The effective tax rate for the first three months of 2019 was 19.3%, compared to 19.7% in the first three months of 2018. The major categories of the Consolidated Statements of Income and their respective impact to the increase (decrease) in net income are presented in the following table:

55

Table of Contents                             

TABLE 1
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
$
 
%
(in thousands, except per share data)
2019
 
2018
 
Change
 
Change
Net interest income
$
230,593

 
$
226,105

 
$
4,488

 
2.0
 %
Provision for credit losses
13,629

 
14,495

 
(866
)
 
(6.0
)
Non-interest income
65,385

 
67,503

 
(2,118
)
 
(3.1
)
Non-interest expense
165,742

 
171,083

 
(5,341
)
 
(3.1
)
Income taxes
22,480

 
21,268

 
1,212

 
5.7

Net income
94,127

 
86,762

 
7,365

 
8.5

Less: Preferred stock dividends
2,010

 
2,010

 

 

Net income available to common stockholders
$
92,117

 
$
84,752

 
$
7,365

 
8.7
 %
Earnings per common share – Basic
$
0.28

 
$
0.26

 
$
0.02

 
7.7
 %
Earnings per common share – Diluted
0.28

 
0.26

 
0.02

 
7.7

Cash dividends per common share
0.12

 
0.12

 

 

The following table presents selected financial ratios and other relevant data used to analyze our performance:
TABLE 2
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
2019
 
2018
Return on average equity
8.21
%
 
7.94
%
Return on average tangible common equity (2)
17.38
%
 
18.01
%
Return on average assets
1.14
%
 
1.12
%
Return on average tangible assets (2)
1.26
%
 
1.25
%
Book value per common share (1)
$
14.09

 
$
13.37

Tangible book value per common share (1) (2)
$
6.91

 
$
6.14

Equity to assets (1)
13.89
%
 
14.01
%
Average equity to average assets
13.93
%
 
14.07
%
Common equity to assets (1)
13.57
%
 
13.67
%
Tangible equity to tangible assets (1) (2)
7.49
%
 
7.14
%
Tangible common equity to tangible assets (1) (2)
7.15
%
 
6.78
%
Dividend payout ratio
42.57
%
 
46.10
%
(1) Period-end
(2) Non-GAAP

56

Table of Contents                             

The following table provides information regarding the average balances and yields earned on interest-earning assets (non-GAAP) and the average balances and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities:
TABLE 3          
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2019
 
2018
(dollars in thousands)
Average
Balance
 
Interest
Income/
Expense
 
Yield/
Rate
 
Average
Balance
 
Interest
Income/
Expense
 
Yield/
Rate
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-earning assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
$
54,167

 
$
462

 
3.46
%
 
$
103,904

 
$
360

 
1.40
%
Taxable investment securities (1)
5,444,523

 
32,850

 
2.41

 
5,046,294

 
26,879

 
2.13

Tax-exempt investment securities (1)(2)
1,108,698

 
9,918

 
3.58

 
951,021

 
8,278

 
3.48

Loans held for sale
32,954

 
508

 
6.21

 
65,897

 
911

 
5.56

Loans and leases (2) (3)
22,379,504

 
270,151

 
4.89

 
21,155,619

 
239,602

 
4.58

Total interest-earning assets (2)
29,019,846

 
313,889

 
4.37

 
27,322,735

 
276,030

 
4.08

Cash and due from banks
377,648

 
 
 
 
 
358,717

 
 
 
 
Allowance for credit losses
(183,482
)
 
 
 
 
 
(180,478
)
 
 
 
 
Premises and equipment
332,055

 
 
 
 
 
336,816

 
 
 
 
Other assets
3,844,135

 
 
 
 
 
3,656,716

 
 
 
 
Total assets
$
33,390,202

 
 
 
 
 
$
31,494,506

 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing demand
$
9,651,737

 
23,564

 
0.99

 
$
9,388,774

 
11,454

 
0.49

Savings
2,510,148

 
2,070

 
0.33

 
2,536,439

 
1,031

 
0.17

Certificates and other time
5,347,638

 
24,743

 
1.88

 
4,637,032

 
13,984

 
1.20

Short-term borrowings
4,311,840

 
25,810

 
2.41

 
3,985,254

 
15,207

 
1.54

Long-term borrowings
661,661

 
3,530

 
2.16

 
660,970

 
5,146

 
3.16

Total interest-bearing liabilities
22,483,024

 
79,717

 
1.44

 
21,208,469

 
46,822

 
0.89

Non-interest-bearing demand
5,892,774

 
 
 
 
 
5,607,640

 
 
 
 
Other liabilities
362,161

 
 
 
 
 
248,128

 
 
 
 
Total liabilities
28,737,959

 
 
 
 
 
27,064,237

 
 
 
 
Stockholders’ equity
4,652,243

 
 
 
 
 
4,430,269

 
 
 
 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
33,390,202

 
 
 
 
 
$
31,494,506

 
 
 
 
Excess of interest-earning assets over interest-bearing liabilities
$
6,536,822

 
 
 
 
 
$
6,114,266

 
 
 
 
Net interest income (FTE) (2)
 
 
234,172

 
 
 
 
 
229,208

 
 
Tax-equivalent adjustment
 
 
(3,579
)
 
 
 
 
 
(3,103
)
 
 
Net interest income
 
 
$
230,593

 
 
 
 
 
$
226,105

 
 
Net interest spread
 
 
 
 
2.93
%
 
 
 
 
 
3.19
%
Net interest margin (2)
 
 
 
 
3.26
%
 
 
 
 
 
3.39
%
(1)
The average balances and yields earned on securities are based on historical cost.
(2)
The interest income amounts are reflected on an FTE basis (non-GAAP), which adjusts for the tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal statutory tax rate of 21%. The yield on earning assets and the net interest margin are presented on an FTE basis. We believe this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts.
(3)
Average balances include non-accrual loans. Loans and leases consist of average total loans less average unearned income.

57

Table of Contents                             

Net Interest Income
Net interest income on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) increased $5.0 million, or 2.2%, from $229.2 million for the first three months of 2018 to $234.2 million for the first three months of 2019. Average interest-earning assets of $29.0 billion increased $1.7 billion or 6.2% and average interest-bearing liabilities of $22.5 billion increased $1.3 billion or 6.0% from the first three months of 2018 due to organic growth in loans and deposits. Our net interest margin FTE (non-GAAP) declined 13 basis points to 3.26% for the first three months of 2019, compared to 3.39% for the same period of 2018, primarily due to the sale of Regency in the third quarter of 2018. Regency contributed 12 basis points to the net interest margin in the first three months of 2018. The decline also reflected higher funding costs caused by four increases in benchmark interest rates during 2018 and increased deposit price competition, partially offset by a 4 basis point increase in the contribution from incremental purchase accounting accretion. Incremental purchase accounting accretion refers to the difference between total accretion and the estimated coupon interest income on loans acquired in a business combination. The Federal Open Market Committee has increased the target Fed Funds rate by 100 basis points between March 2018 and March 2019.
The following table provides certain information regarding changes in net interest income on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) attributable to changes in the average volumes and yields earned on interest-earning assets and the average volume and rates paid for interest-bearing liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2019, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2018:
TABLE 4
(in thousands)
Volume
 
Rate
 
Net
Interest Income (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
$
(172
)
 
$
274

 
$
102

Securities (2)
4,431

 
3,180

 
7,611

Loans held for sale
(461
)
 
58

 
(403
)
Loans and leases (2)
12,137

 
18,412

 
30,549

Total interest income (2)
15,935

 
21,924

 
37,859

Interest Expense (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing demand
656

 
11,454

 
12,110

Savings
195

 
844

 
1,039

Certificates and other time
2,405

 
8,354

 
10,759

Short-term borrowings
1,706

 
8,897

 
10,603

Long-term borrowings
5

 
(1,621
)
 
(1,616
)
Total interest expense
4,967

 
27,928

 
32,895

Net change (2)
$
10,968

 
$
(6,004
)
 
$
4,964


(1)
The amount of change not solely due to rate or volume changes was allocated between the change due to rate and the change due to volume based on the net size of the rate and volume changes.
(2)
Interest income amounts are reflected on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) which adjusts for the tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal statutory tax rate of 21%. We believe this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts.
Interest income on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) of $313.9 million for the first three months of 2019, increased $37.9 million or 13.7% from the same quarter of 2018, due to increased interest-earning assets, combined with higher rates resulting from the increase in the target Fed Funds rate, as discussed above. During the first three months of 2019, we recognized $8.4 million of incremental purchase accounting accretion and $1.0 million of cash recoveries, compared to $4.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in the first three months of 2018. The increase in interest-earning assets was primarily driven by a $1.2 billion or 5.8% increase in average loans and leases due to solid growth in our commercial and consumer portfolios. Average total commercial loan growth totaled $602 million, or 4.5%, including 13.2% growth in commercial and industrial loans and commercial leases. Commercial loan growth was led by strong activity in the Cleveland and Mid-Atlantic (Greater Baltimore-Washington D.C. markets) regions and continued growth in the equipment finance and asset-based lending businesses. Average consumer loan growth was $622 million, or 8.0%, as growth in indirect auto loans of $468 million, or 31.7%, and residential

58

Table of Contents                             

mortgage loans of $446 million, or 16.4%, was partially offset by declines in direct installment loans and consumer lines of credit. Excluding Regency balances in the first quarter of 2018, average loans grew 6.6%. Additionally, average securities increased $555.9 million or 9.3%, primarily as a result of increases in collateralized mortgage obligations of $733.9 million, states of the U.S. and political subdivisions of $158.6 million and U.S. government agencies of $157.6 million, partially offset by a decrease of $437.3 million in mortgage-backed securities. The yield on average interest-earning assets (non-GAAP) increased 29 basis points from the first three months of 2018 to 4.37% for the first three months of 2019. The 29 basis point increase in earning asset yields reflects repricing of variable and adjustable loans, higher purchase accounting accretion and higher reinvestment rates on securities.  
Interest expense of $79.7 million for the first three months of 2019 increased $32.9 million, or 70.3%, from the same quarter of 2018 due to an increase in rates paid and growth in average interest-bearing liabilities, as interest-bearing deposits and borrowings increased over the same quarter of 2018. Average interest-bearing deposits increased $947.3 million or 5.7%, which reflects the benefit of our expanded banking footprint in our southeastern markets and organic growth in transaction deposits. Average short-term borrowings increased $326.6 million or 8.2%, primarily as a result of increases of $382.2 million in short-term FHLB borrowings and $27.9 in federal funds purchased, partially offset by decreases of $57.8 million in customer repurchase agreements and $25.7 million in short-term subordinated notes. Average long-term borrowings increased $0.7 million, or 0.1%, which reflects an increase of $52.6 million in subordinated debt, partially offset by a decrease of $50.5 million in long-term FHLB borrowings. During the first quarter of 2019, we issued $120.0 million of 4.950% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due in 2029. We used part of the proceeds from this issuance to redeem higher-rate debt, including $10.0 million in junior subordinated debt and $25.0 million in other subordinated debt. Additionally, in April 2019, we redeemed $34.0 million in junior subordinated debt. The rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased 55 basis points to 1.44% for the first three months of 2019, due to the Federal Open Market Committee interest rate increases, higher average short-term borrowings and changes in the funding mix. First quarter 2019 interest expense included $0.9 million of incremental interest expense related to the $120.0 million note issuance and a benefit of $2.5 million for the recognition of the remaining discount on higher coupon acquired debt, which was retired during the quarter. Additionally, non-interest expense of $1.1 million was recorded related to the debt extinguishment.

Provision for Credit Losses
The following table presents information regarding the provision for credit losses and net charge-offs:
TABLE 5
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
$
 
%
(dollars in thousands)
2019
 
2018
 
Change
 
Change
Provision for credit losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Originated
$
9,237

 
$
14,770

 
$
(5,533
)
 
(37.5
)%
Loans acquired in a business combination
4,392

 
(275
)
 
4,667

 
n/m

Total provision for credit losses
$
13,629

 
$
14,495

 
$
(866
)
 
(6.0
)%
Net loan charge-offs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Originated
$
4,751

 
$
11,042

 
$
(6,291
)
 
(57.0
)%
Loans acquired in a business combination
2,828

 
(414
)
 
3,242

 
n/m

Total net loan charge-offs
$
7,579

 
$
10,628

 
$
(3,049
)
 
(28.7
)%
Net loan charge-offs (annualized) / total average loans and leases
0.14
%
 
0.20
%
 
 
 
 
Net originated loan charge-offs (annualized) / total average originated loans and leases
0.10
%
 
0.29
%
 
 
 
 
n/m - not meaningful
The provision for credit losses of $13.6 million during the first three months of 2019 decreased $0.9 million from the same period of 2018, supporting strong loan growth and exceeding net charge-offs of $7.6 million, or 0.14% annualized of total average loans. The provision for the originated portfolio decreased $5.5 million, while the provision for loans acquired in a business combination increased $4.7 million during the first three months of 2019 compared to the year-ago period, primarily due to a single commercial credit. Net loan charge-offs of $7.6 million for the first three months of 2019 decreased $3.0 million from the year-ago period, primarily due to lower commercial charge-offs and the previous actions taken to reduce credit

59

Table of Contents                             

risk, including the sale of Regency. For additional information relating to the allowance and provision for credit losses, refer to the Allowance for Credit Losses section of this MD&A.
Non-Interest Income
The breakdown of non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 is presented in the following table:
TABLE 6
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
$
 
%
(dollars in thousands)
2019
 
2018
 
Change
 
Change
Service charges
$
30,217

 
$
30,077

 
$
140

 
0.5
 %
Trust services
6,784

 
6,448

 
336

 
5.2

Insurance commissions and fees
4,897

 
5,135

 
(238
)
 
(4.6
)
Securities commissions and fees
4,345

 
4,319

 
26

 
0.6

Capital markets income
6,036

 
5,214

 
822

 
15.8

Mortgage banking operations
3,905

 
5,529

 
(1,624
)
 
(29.4
)
Dividends on non-marketable equity securities
5,023

 
3,975

 
1,048

 
26.4

Bank owned life insurance
2,841

 
3,285

 
(444
)
 
(13.5
)
Other
1,337

 
3,521

 
(2,184
)
 
(62.0
)
Total non-interest income
$
65,385

 
$
67,503

 
$
(2,118
)
 
(3.1
)%
Total non-interest income decreased $2.1 million, to $65.4 million for the first three months of 2019, a 3.1% decrease from the same period of 2018. Excluding a $1.2 million branch consolidation-related loss on fixed assets, non-interest income decreased $0.9 million, or 1.4%. The variances in significant individual non-interest income items are further explained in the following paragraphs.
Capital markets income of $6.0 million for the first three months of 2019 increased $0.8 million or 15.8% from $5.2 million for 2018, reflecting continued solid contributions from commercial swap activity across our footprint, combined with increased syndication fees and international banking activity.
Mortgage banking operations income of $3.9 million for the first three months of 2019 decreased $1.6 million, or 29.4%, from the same period of 2018, primarily due to a $1.3 million interest rate-related valuation adjustment on MSRs and lower activity levels. During the first three months of 2019, we sold $194.0 million of residential mortgage loans, a 26.8% decrease compared to $265.0 million for the same period of 2018. Sold loan margins have been lower in both retail and correspondent loans due to competitive pressure and the mix of loans sold.
Dividends on non-marketable equity securities of $5.0 million for 2019 increased $1.0 million, or 26.4%, from $4.0 million for 2018, primarily due to an increase in the FHLB dividend rate.
Other non-interest income was $1.3 million and $3.5 million for the first three months of 2019 and 2018, respectively. During the first three months of 2019, we recorded $1.2 million in losses on fixed assets related to the branch consolidations. Additionally, SBA loan gain on sale and servicing-related income decreased $0.8 million compared to the year-ago period.

60

Table of Contents                             

The following table presents non-interest income excluding significant items for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:
TABLE 7
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
$
 
%
(dollars in thousands)
2019
 
2018
 
Change
 
Change
Total non-interest income, as reported
$
65,385

 
$
67,503

 
$
(2,118
)
 
(3.1
)%
Significant items:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Loss on fixed assets related to branch consolidations
1,176

 

 
1,176

 
 
Total non-interest income, excluding significant items(1)
$
66,561

 
$
67,503

 
$
(942
)
 
(1.4
)%
(1) Non-GAAP

Non-Interest Expense
The breakdown of non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 is presented in the following table:
TABLE 8
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
$
 
%
(dollars in thousands)
2019
 
2018
 
Change
 
Change
Salaries and employee benefits
$
91,284

 
$
89,326

 
$
1,958

 
2.2
 %
Net occupancy
15,065

 
15,568

 
(503
)
 
(3.2
)
Equipment
14,825

 
14,465

 
360

 
2.5

Amortization of intangibles
3,479

 
4,218

 
(739
)
 
(17.5
)
Outside services
14,745

 
14,725

 
20

 
0.1

FDIC insurance
5,950

 
8,834

 
(2,884
)
 
(32.6
)
Bank shares and franchise taxes
3,467

 
3,452

 
15

 
0.4

Other
16,927

 
20,495

 
(3,568
)
 
(17.4
)
Total non-interest expense
$
165,742

 
$
171,083

 
$
(5,341
)
 
(3.1
)%
Total non-interest expense of $165.7 million for the first three months of 2019 decreased $5.3 million, a 3.1% increase from the same period of 2018. Excluding $0.5 million of branch consolidation costs, non-interest expense decreased $5.8 million, or 3.4%. The variances in the individual non-interest expense items are further explained in the following paragraphs.
Salaries and employee benefits of $91.3 million for the first three months of 2019 increased $2.0 million or 2.2% from the same period of 2018. The increase was primarily due to normal 2018 merit increases last April and increasing the minimum wage for our hourly employees in response to tax reform, partially offset by the sale of Regency, which was included in the first three months of 2018.
Amortization of intangibles expense of $3.5 million for the first three months of 2019 decreased $0.7 million, or 17.5% from the first three months of 2018, due to the completion of amortization for a core deposit intangible from a prior acquisition.
FDIC insurance of $6.0 million for the first three months of 2019 decreased $2.9 million, or 32.6%, from the same period of 2018, primarily due to the elimination of the FDIC's large bank surcharge in the fourth quarter of 2018.
Other non-interest expense was $16.9 million and $20.5 million for the first three months of 2019 and 2018, respectively. Decreases in other non-interest expense spanned across various categories such as marketing expense, other tax expense and miscellaneous losses compared to the year-ago period, partially due to our focus on efficiency and expense control, combined with the sale of Regency, which was included in the first three months of 2018.

61

Table of Contents                             

The following table presents non-interest expense excluding significant items for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:
TABLE 9
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
$
 
%
(dollars in thousands)
2019
 
2018
 
Change
 
Change
Total non-interest expense, as reported
$
165,742

 
$
171,083

 
$
(5,341
)
 
(3.1
)%
Significant items:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Branch consolidations - salaries and benefits
(419
)
 

 
(419
)
 
 
   Branch consolidations - occupancy and equipment
17

 

 
17

 
 
   Branch consolidations - other
(56
)
 

 
(56
)
 
 
Total non-interest expense, excluding significant items(1)
$
165,284

 
$
171,083

 
$
(5,799
)
 
(3.4
)%
(1) Non-GAAP

Income Taxes
The following table presents information regarding income tax expense and certain tax rates:
TABLE 10
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2019
 
2018
Income tax expense
$
22,480

 
$
21,268

Effective tax rate
19.3
%
 
19.7
%
Statutory federal tax rate
21.0
%
 
21.0
%
Both periods’ tax rates are lower than the federal statutory tax rates of 21% due to the tax benefits primarily resulting from tax-exempt income on investments and loans, tax credits and income from BOLI.


62

Table of Contents                             

FINANCIAL CONDITION
The following table presents our condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
TABLE 11
(dollars in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
497

 
$
488

 
$
9

 
1.8
 %
Securities
6,574

 
6,595

 
(21
)
 
(0.3
)
Loans held for sale
37

 
22

 
15

 
68.2

Loans and leases, net
22,434

 
21,973

 
461

 
2.1

Goodwill and other intangibles
2,330

 
2,334

 
(4
)
 
(0.2
)
Other assets
1,823

 
1,690

 
133

 
7.9

Total Assets
$
33,695

 
$
33,102

 
$
593

 
1.8
 %
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
$
23,882

 
$
23,455

 
$
427

 
1.8
 %
Borrowings
4,784

 
4,756

 
28

 
0.6

Other liabilities
349

 
283

 
66

 
23.3

Total liabilities
29,015

 
28,494

 
521

 
1.8

Stockholders’ equity
4,680

 
4,608

 
72

 
1.6

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
$
33,695

 
$
33,102

 
$
593

 
1.8
 %

Non-Performing Assets
Following is a summary of total non-performing assets:
TABLE 12
(in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Commercial real estate
$
27

 
$
23

 
$
4

 
17.4
 %
Commercial and industrial
31

 
37

 
(6
)
 
(16.2
)
Commercial leases
2

 
2

 

 

Other
1

 
1

 

 

Total commercial loans and leases
61

 
63

 
(2
)
 
(3.2
)
Direct installment
14

 
14

 

 

Residential mortgages
15

 
14

 
1

 
7.1

Indirect installment
2

 
2

 

 

Consumer lines of credit
6

 
7

 
(1
)
 
(14.3
)
Total consumer loans
37

 
37

 

 

Total non-performing loans and leases
98

 
100

 
(2
)
 
(2.0
)
Other real estate owned
34

 
35

 
(1
)
 
(2.9
)
Total non-performing assets
$
132

 
$
135

 
$
(3
)
 
(2.2
)%
Non-performing assets decreased $2.6 million, from $134.7 million at December 31, 2018 to $132.1 million at March 31, 2019. This reflects decreases of $1.2 million in OREO, $1.1 million in non-accrual loans and $0.3 million in TDRs.

63

Table of Contents                             

Following is a summary of performing, non-performing and non-accrual TDRs, by class:

TABLE 13
(in millions)
Performing
 
Non-
Performing
 
Non-
Accrual
 
Total
Originated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$

 
$

 
$
2

 
$
2

Commercial and industrial

 

 
1

 
1

Total commercial loans

 

 
3

 
3

Direct installment
11

 
7

 
3

 
21

Residential mortgages
5

 
8

 
3

 
16

Indirect installment

 

 

 

Consumer lines of credit
2

 
1

 
1

 
4

Total consumer loans
18

 
16

 
7

 
41

Total TDRs
$
18

 
$
16

 
$
10

 
$
44

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$

 
$

 
$
2

 
$
2

Commercial and industrial

 
1

 

 
1

Total commercial loans

 
1

 
2

 
3

Direct installment
11

 
6

 
4

 
21

Residential mortgages
5

 
8

 
3

 
16

Consumer lines of credit
2

 
2

 

 
4

Total consumer loans
18

 
16

 
7

 
41

Total TDRs
$
18

 
$
17

 
$
9

 
$
44

Acquired
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$

 
$
3

 
$

 
$
3

Total commercial loans

 
3

 

 
3

Consumer lines of credit

 
1

 

 
1

Total consumer loans

 
1

 

 
1

Total TDRs
$

 
$
4

 
$

 
$
4

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate
$

 
$
3

 
$

 
$
3

Total commercial loans

 
3

 

 
3

Consumer lines of credit

 
1

 

 
1

Total consumer loans

 
1

 

 
1

Total TDRs
$

 
$
4

 
$

 
$
4


Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses of $185.7 million at March 31, 2019 increased $6.1 million, or 3.4%, from December 31, 2018, primarily in support of growth in originated loans and leases. The provision for credit losses during the three months ended March 31, 2019 was $13.6 million, which covered net charge-offs and supported organic loan growth. Net charge-offs were $7.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2019, compared to $10.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018, with the decrease primarily due to the sale of Regency, which accounted for $2.5 million of the decrease. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of non-performing loans for the total portfolio increased from 180% as of December 31, 2018 to 189% as of March 31, 2019, as provision exceeded charge-offs in support of loan growth, while the level of non-performing loans decreased.

64

Table of Contents                             

Following is a summary of supplemental statistical ratios pertaining to our originated loans and leases portfolio. The originated loans and leases portfolio excludes loans acquired at fair value and accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. Also see Note 4, Loans and Leases, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
TABLE 14
 
At or For the Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
March 31,
2018
Non-performing loans / total originated loans and leases
0.43
%
 
0.44
%
 
0.58
%
Non-performing loans + OREO / total originated loans and leases + OREO
0.59
%
 
0.61
%
 
0.81
%
Allowance for credit losses (originated loans) / total originated loans and leases
0.94
%
 
0.95
%
 
1.08
%
Net charge-offs on originated loans and leases (annualized) / total average originated loans and leases
0.10
%
 
0.27
%
 
0.29
%

Deposits
As a bank holding company, our primary source of funds is deposits. These deposits are provided by businesses, municipalities and individuals located within the markets served by our Community Banking subsidiary.
Following is a summary of deposits:
TABLE 15
(in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Non-interest-bearing demand
$
6,124

 
$
6,000

 
$
124

 
2.1
 %
Interest-bearing demand
9,743

 
9,660

 
83

 
0.9

Savings
2,523

 
2,526

 
(3
)
 
(0.1
)
Certificates and other time deposits
5,492

 
5,269

 
223

 
4.2

Total deposits
$
23,882

 
$
23,455

 
$
427

 
1.8
 %
Total deposits increased from December 31, 2018, primarily as a result of growth in non-interest-bearing and interest-bearing demand balances and certificates and other time deposits. The growth reflects heightened deposit-gathering efforts focused on attracting new customer relationships through targeted promotional interest rates on 13-month, 19-month and 25-month certificates of deposit, combined with deepening relationships with existing customers through internal lead generation efforts. Relationship-based transaction deposits, which are comprised of demand (non-interest-bearing and interest-bearing) and savings accounts (including money market savings), also increased over this period. Generating growth in the relationship-based transaction deposits remains a key focus for us and will help us manage to lower levels of short-term borrowings.

Capital Resources and Regulatory Matters
The access to, and cost of, funding for new business initiatives, the ability to engage in expanded business activities, the ability to pay dividends and the level and nature of regulatory oversight depend, in part, on our capital position.
The assessment of capital adequacy depends on a number of factors such as expected organic growth in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, asset quality, liquidity, earnings performance, changing competitive conditions and economic forces. We seek to maintain a strong capital base to support our growth and expansion activities, to provide stability to current operations and to promote public confidence.
We have an effective shelf registration statement filed with the SEC. Pursuant to this registration statement, we may, from time to time, issue and sell in one or more offerings any combination of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, depositary shares, warrants, stock purchase contracts or units. On February 14, 2019, we completed our offering of $120.0 million 4.950% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due in 2029 under this registration statement. The subordinated notes are treated as tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes. The net proceeds of the debt offering after deducting underwriting

65

Table of Contents                             

discounts and commissions and offering expenses were $118.2 million. We intend to use and have used the net proceeds from the sale of the subordinated notes to redeem higher-rate long-term borrowings and for general corporate purposes.
Capital management is a continuous process, with capital plans and stress testing for FNB and FNBPA updated at least annually. These capital plans include assessing the adequacy of expected capital levels assuming various scenarios by projecting capital needs for a forecast period of 2-3 years beyond the current year. From time to time, we issue shares initially acquired by us as treasury stock under our various benefit plans. We may issue additional preferred or common stock in order to maintain our well-capitalized status.
FNB and FNBPA are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies (see discussion under “Enhanced Regulatory Capital Standards”). Quantitative measures established by regulators to ensure capital adequacy require FNB and FNBPA to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total, tier 1 and common equity tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and minimum leverage ratio (as defined). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could lead to initiation of certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions, by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements, dividends and future merger and acquisition activity. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, FNB and FNBPA must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. FNB’s and FNBPA’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
As of March 31, 2019, the most recent notification from the federal banking agencies categorized FNB and FNBPA as “well-capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since the notification which management believes have changed this categorization. Our management believes that, as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, FNB and FNBPA met all “well-capitalized” requirements to which each of them was subject.

66

Table of Contents                             

Following are the capital amounts and related ratios for FNB and FNBPA:
TABLE 16
 
Actual
 
Well-Capitalized
Requirements
 
Minimum Capital
Requirements plus Capital Conservation Buffer
(dollars in millions)
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
As of March 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
F.N.B. Corporation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total capital
$
3,024

 
11.65
%
 
$
2,595

 
10.00
%
 
$
2,725

 
10.50
%
Tier 1 capital
2,453

 
9.45

 
2,076

 
8.00

 
2,206

 
8.50

Common equity tier 1
2,346

 
9.04

 
1,687

 
6.50

 
1,816

 
7.00

Leverage
2,453

 
7.88

 
1,556

 
5.00

 
1,245

 
4.00

Risk-weighted assets
25,949

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FNBPA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total capital
2,838

 
10.96
%
 
2,590

 
10.00
%
 
2,719

 
10.50
%
Tier 1 capital
2,651

 
10.24

 
2,072

 
8.00

 
2,201

 
8.50

Common equity tier 1
2,571

 
9.93

 
1,683

 
6.50

 
1,813

 
7.00

Leverage
2,651

 
8.53

 
1,554

 
5.00

 
1,243

 
4.00

Risk-weighted assets
25,897

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
F.N.B. Corporation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total capital
$
2,875

 
11.54
%
 
$
2,490

 
10.00
%
 
$
2,459

 
9.88
%
Tier 1 capital
2,395

 
9.62

 
1,992

 
8.00

 
1,961

 
7.88

Common equity tier 1
2,289

 
9.19

 
1,619

 
6.50

 
1,588

 
6.38

Leverage
2,395

 
7.87

 
1,523

 
5.00

 
1,218

 
4.00

Risk-weighted assets
24,900

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FNBPA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total capital
2,735

 
10.99
%
 
2,489

 
10.00
%
 
2,458

 
9.88
%
Tier 1 capital
2,553

 
10.26

 
1,992

 
8.00

 
1,960

 
7.88

Common equity tier 1
2,473

 
9.94

 
1,618

 
6.50

 
1,587

 
6.38

Leverage
2,553

 
8.39

 
1,521

 
5.00

 
1,217

 
4.00

Risk-weighted assets
24,894

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In accordance with Basel III, the implementation of capital requirements is transitional and was phased-in from January 1, 2015 through January 1, 2019. The minimum capital requirements plus capital conservation buffer, which are presented for each period above based on the phase-in schedule, represent the minimum requirements needed to avoid limitations on distributions of dividends and certain discretionary bonus payments. Our management believes that FNB and FNBPA will continue to meet all “well-capitalized” requirements after Basel III is completely phased-in.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act)
The Dodd-Frank Act broadly affects the financial services industry by establishing a framework for systemic risk oversight, creating a resolution authority for institutions determined to be systemically important, mandating higher capital and liquidity requirements, requiring banks to pay increased fees to regulatory agencies and containing numerous other provisions aimed at strengthening the sound operation of the financial services sector that significantly change the system of regulatory oversight as described in more detail under Part I, Item 1, “Business - Government Supervision and Regulation” included in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019. Many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to further rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact to us or across the financial services industry.


67

Table of Contents                             

LIQUIDITY
Our goal in liquidity management is to satisfy the cash flow requirements of customers and the operating cash needs of FNB with cost-effective funding. Our Board of Directors has established an Asset/Liability Management Policy to guide management in achieving and maintaining earnings performance consistent with long-term goals, while maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate risk, a “well-capitalized” Balance Sheet and adequate levels of liquidity. Our Board of Directors has also established a Contingency Funding Policy to guide management in addressing stressed liquidity conditions. These policies designate our Asset/Liability Committee as the body responsible for meeting these objectives. The ALCO, which is comprised of members of executive management, reviews liquidity on a continuous basis and approves significant changes in strategies that affect Balance Sheet or cash flow positions. Liquidity is centrally managed daily by our Treasury Department.
FNBPA generates liquidity from its normal business operations. Liquidity sources from assets include payments from loans and investments, as well as the ability to securitize, pledge or sell loans, investment securities and other assets. Liquidity sources from liabilities are generated primarily through the banking offices of FNBPA in the form of deposits and customer repurchase agreements. FNB also has access to reliable and cost-effective wholesale sources of liquidity. Short- and long-term funds are used to help fund normal business operations, and unused credit availability can be utilized to serve as contingency funding if we would be faced with a liquidity crisis.
The principal sources of the parent company’s liquidity are its strong existing cash resources plus dividends it receives from its subsidiaries. These dividends may be impacted by the parent’s or its subsidiaries’ capital needs, statutory laws and regulations, corporate policies, contractual restrictions, profitability and other factors. In addition, through one of our subsidiaries, we regularly issue subordinated notes, which are guaranteed by FNB. Management has utilized various strategies to ensure sufficient cash on hand is available to meet the Parent's funding needs.  During the first quarter of 2019, we completed a debt offering in which we issued $120.0 million aggregate principal amount of fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due in 2029. The net proceeds of the debt offering after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering costs were $118.2 million. This Other Subordinated Debt is eligible for treatment as tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes. Also, we repurchased and retired $9.5 million and redeemed $15.5 million in higher interest rate subordinated debt assumed in the 2017 YDKN acquisition. Additionally, we redeemed $10.0 million of TPS issued by American Community Capital Trust I also assumed in the 2017 YDKN acquisition. These transactions were the primary drivers of the parent’s cash position increasing by $43.1 million from $254.4 million at December 31, 2018 to $297.5 million at March 31, 2019. Additionally, we exercised the call options on $26.0 million of Omega Financial Capital Trust I and $8.0 million of Crescent Financial Capital Trust I with April settlements. From the net debt issuance proceeds, we completed a capital infusion of $40.0 million to FNBPA in March. These transactions accomplished strategic objectives, including offering additional liquidity.
Management believes our cash levels are appropriate given the current environment. Two metrics that are used to gauge the adequacy of the parent company’s cash position are the LCR and MCH. The LCR is defined as the sum of cash on hand plus projected cash inflows over the next 12 months divided by projected cash outflows over the next 12 months. The MCH is defined as the number of months of corporate expenses and dividends that can be covered by the cash on hand.
The LCR and MCH ratios are presented in the following table:
TABLE 17

 
March 31,
2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
Internal
limit
Liquidity coverage ratio
 
2.0 times
 
2.1 times
 
> 1 time
Months of cash on hand
 
14.7 months
 
14.4 months
 
> 12 months
Our liquidity position has been positively impacted by our ability to generate growth in relationship-based accounts. Organic growth in low-cost transaction deposits was complemented by management’s strategy of heightened deposit gathering efforts focused on attracting new customer relationships and deepening relationships with existing customers, in part through internal lead generation efforts leveraging data analytics capabilities.  Total deposits were $23.9 billion at March 31, 2019, an increase of $427.7 million, or 7.4% annualized from December 31, 2018. Total non-interest demand deposit accounts grew by $124.7 million, or 8.4% annualized, and interest-bearing demand increased by $82.8 million, or 3.4% annualized. Growth in time deposits was $222.8 million, or 17.2% annualized. Savings account balances decreased $2.5 million, or 0.5% annualized.
FNBPA has significant unused wholesale credit availability sources that include the availability to borrow from the FHLB, the FRB, correspondent bank lines, access to brokered deposits and multiple other channels. In addition to credit availability,

68

Table of Contents                             

FNBPA also possesses salable unpledged government and agency securities that could be utilized to meet funding needs. The ALCO Policy minimum guideline level for salable unpledged government and agency securities is 3.0%.
The following table presents certain information relating to FNBPA’s credit availability and salable unpledged securities:
TABLE 18
(dollars in millions)
March 31,
2019
 
December 31, 2018
Unused wholesale credit availability
$
9,618

 
$
9,659

Unused wholesale credit availability as a % of FNBPA assets
28.6
%
 
29.2
%
Salable unpledged government and agency securities
$
2,511

 
$
2,424

Salable unpledged government and agency securities as a % of FNBPA assets
7.5
%
 
7.3
%
Another metric for measuring liquidity risk is the liquidity gap analysis. The following liquidity gap analysis as of March 31, 2019 compares the difference between our cash flows from existing earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities over future time intervals. Management seeks to limit the size of the liquidity gaps so that sources and uses of funds are reasonably matched in the normal course of business. A reasonably matched position lays a better foundation for dealing with additional funding needs during a potential liquidity crisis. The twelve-month cumulative gap to total assets ratio was (6.6)% and (7.1)% as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Management calculates this ratio at least quarterly and it is reviewed monthly by ALCO.
TABLE 19
(dollars in millions)
Within
1 Month
 
2-3
Months
 
4-6
Months
 
7-12
Months
 
Total
1 Year
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans
$
464

 
$
1,039

 
$
1,258

 
$
2,422

 
$
5,183

Investments
153

 
167

 
291

 
534

 
1,145

 
617

 
1,206

 
1,549

 
2,956

 
6,328

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-maturity deposits
180

 
359

 
539

 
1,078

 
2,156

Time deposits
607

 
843

 
698

 
1,415

 
3,563

Borrowings
2,750

 
16

 
21

 
47

 
2,834

 
3,537

 
1,218

 
1,258

 
2,540

 
8,553

Period Gap (Assets - Liabilities)
$
(2,920
)
 
$
(12
)
 
$
291

 
$
416

 
$
(2,225
)
Cumulative Gap
$
(2,920
)
 
$
(2,932
)
 
$
(2,641
)
 
$
(2,225
)
 
 
Cumulative Gap to Total Assets
(8.7
)%
 
(8.7
)%
 
(7.8
)%
 
(6.6
)%
 
 
In addition, the ALCO regularly monitors various liquidity ratios and stress scenarios of our liquidity position. The stress scenarios forecast that adequate funding will be available even under severe conditions. Management believes we have sufficient liquidity available to meet our normal operating and contingency funding cash needs.
     
MARKET RISK
Market risk refers to potential losses arising predominately from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices. We are primarily exposed to interest rate risk inherent in our lending and deposit-taking activities as a financial intermediary. To succeed in this capacity, we offer an extensive variety of financial products to meet the diverse needs of our customers. These products sometimes contribute to interest rate risk for us when product groups do not complement one another. For example, depositors may want short-term deposits, while borrowers desire long-term loans.
Changes in market interest rates may result in changes in the fair value of our financial instruments, cash flows and net interest income. The Board of Directors has given ALCO the responsibility for market risk management, which involves devising policy guidelines, risk measures and limits, and managing the amount of interest rate risk and its effect on net interest income

69

Table of Contents                             

and capital. We use derivative financial instruments for interest rate risk management purposes and not for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest rate risk is comprised of repricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and options risk. Repricing risk arises from differences in the cash flow or repricing between asset and liability portfolios. Basis risk arises when asset and liability portfolios are related to different market rate indexes, which do not always change by the same amount. Yield curve risk arises when asset and liability portfolios are related to different maturities on a given yield curve; when the yield curve changes shape, the risk position is altered. Options risk arises from “embedded options” within asset and liability products as certain borrowers have the option to prepay their loans when rates fall, while certain depositors can redeem their certificates of deposit early when rates rise.
We use an asset/liability model to measure our interest rate risk. Interest rate risk measures we utilize include earnings simulation, EVE and gap analysis. Gap analysis and EVE are static measures that do not incorporate assumptions regarding future business. Gap analysis, while a helpful diagnostic tool, displays cash flows for only a single rate environment. EVE’s long-term horizon helps identify changes in optionality and longer-term positions. However, EVE’s liquidation perspective does not translate into the earnings-based measures that are the focus of managing and valuing a going concern. Net interest income simulations explicitly measure the exposure to earnings from changes in market rates of interest. In these simulations, our current financial position is combined with assumptions regarding future business to calculate net interest income under various hypothetical rate scenarios. The ALCO reviews earnings simulations over multiple years under various interest rate scenarios on a periodic basis. Reviewing these various measures provides us with a comprehensive view of our interest rate risk profile, which provides the basis for balance sheet management strategies.
The following repricing gap analysis as of March 31, 2019 compares the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities subject to repricing over a period of time. Management utilizes the repricing gap analysis as a diagnostic tool in managing net interest income and EVE risk measures.
TABLE 20
(dollars in millions)
Within
1 Month
 
2-3
Months
 
4-6
Months
 
7-12
Months
 
Total
1 Year
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans
$
10,280

 
$
789

 
$
831

 
$
1,530

 
$
13,430

Investments
153

 
177

 
452

 
530

 
1,312

 
10,433

 
966

 
1,283

 
2,060

 
14,742

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-maturity deposits
6,453

 

 

 

 
6,453

Time deposits
702

 
843

 
696

 
1,411

 
3,652

Borrowings
3,120

 
1,032

 
6

 
19

 
4,177

 
10,275

 
1,875

 
702

 
1,430

 
14,282

Off-balance sheet
(100
)
 
955

 

 

 
855

Period Gap (assets – liabilities + off-balance sheet)
$
58

 
$
46

 
$
581

 
$
630

 
$
1,315

Cumulative Gap
$
58

 
$
104

 
$
685

 
$
1,315

 
 
Cumulative Gap to Assets
0.2
%
 
0.4
%
 
2.3
%
 
4.5
%
 
 
The twelve-month cumulative repricing gap to total assets was 4.5% and 3.2% as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The positive cumulative gap positions indicate that we have a greater amount of repricing earning assets than repricing interest-bearing liabilities over the subsequent twelve months. If interest rates increase then net interest income will increase and, conversely, if interest rates decrease then net interest income will decrease. The change in the cumulative repricing gap at March 31, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018, is primarily related to growth and changes in the mix of loans, deposits and borrowings. The growth in the certificates of deposit portfolio was offset with the increased repricing of adjustable loans, the increased cash flow of the indirect portfolio, the funding of long-term FHLB advances and the use of interest rate swaps.

70

Table of Contents                             

The allocation of non-maturity deposits and customer repurchase agreements to the one-month maturity category above is based on the estimated sensitivity of each product to changes in market rates. For example, if a product’s rate is estimated to increase by 50% as much as the market rates, then 50% of the account balance was placed in this category.
Utilizing net interest income simulations, the following net interest income metrics were calculated using rate shocks which move market rates in an immediate and parallel fashion. The variance percentages represent the change between the net interest income and EVE calculated under the particular rate scenario versus the net interest income and EVE that was calculated assuming market rates as of March 31, 2019. Using a static Balance Sheet structure, the measures do not reflect all of management's potential counteractions.
The following table presents an analysis of the potential sensitivity of our net interest income and EVE to changes in interest rates using rate shocks:
TABLE 21
 
March 31,
2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
ALCO
Limits
Net interest income change (12 months):
 
 
 
 
 
+ 300 basis points
5.3
 %
 
3.5
 %
 
n/a

+ 200 basis points
3.8
 %
 
2.5
 %
 
(5.0
)%
+ 100 basis points
2.0
 %
 
1.4
 %
 
(5.0
)%
- 100 basis points
(3.6
)%
 
(3.1
)%
 
(5.0
)%
Economic value of equity:
 
 
 
 
 
+ 300 basis points
(7.0
)%
 
(8.0
)%
 
(25.0
)%
+ 200 basis points
(4.3
)%
 
(5.2
)%
 
(15.0
)%
+ 100 basis points
(1.5
)%
 
(2.0
)%
 
(10.0
)%
- 100 basis points
(1.9
)%
 
(1.0
)%
 
(10.0
)%
We also model rate scenarios which move all rates gradually over twelve months (Rate Ramps) and model scenarios that gradually change the shape of the yield curve. Assuming a static Balance Sheet, a +300 basis point Rate Ramp increases net interest income (12 months) by 3.7% at March 31, 2019 and 2.7% at December 31, 2018.
Our strategy is generally to manage to a neutral interest rate risk position. However, given the current interest rate environment, the interest rate risk position has been managed to a slightly asset-sensitive position. Currently, rising rates are expected to have a modest, positive effect on net interest income versus net interest income if rates remained unchanged.
The ALCO utilizes several tactics to manage our interest rate risk position. As mentioned earlier, the growth in transaction deposits provides funding that is less interest rate-sensitive than short-term time deposits and wholesale borrowings. On the lending side, we regularly sell long-term fixed-rate residential mortgages to the secondary market and have been successful in the origination of consumer and commercial loans with short-term repricing characteristics. Total variable and adjustable-rate loans were 58.1% and 57.4% of total loans as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. As of March 31, 2019, 79.2% of these loans, or 46.0% of total loans, are tied to the Prime or one-month LIBOR rates. The investment portfolio is used, in part, to manage our interest rate risk position. Finally, we have made use of interest rate swaps to commercial borrowers (commercial swaps) to manage our interest rate risk position as the commercial swaps effectively increase adjustable-rate loans. As of March 31, 2019, the commercial swaps totaled $2.9 billion of notional principal, with $247.7 million in notional swap principal originated during the first three months of 2019. The success of the aforementioned tactics has resulted in a slightly asset-sensitive position. For additional information regarding interest rate swaps, see Note 9 in this Report.
We desired to remain slightly asset-sensitive during the first three months of 2019. A number of management actions and market occurrences resulted in the slight increase in the asset sensitivity of our interest rate risk position during the period. The increase was primarily due to management's actions with the timing of funding loan and investment growth, as well as successful efforts to extend maturities in certificate of deposit activity and continued strong commercial loan interest rate swap activity.

71

Table of Contents                             

We recognize that all asset/liability models have some inherent shortcomings. Asset/liability models require certain assumptions to be made, such as prepayment rates on interest-earning assets and repricing impact on non-maturity deposits, which may differ from actual experience. These business assumptions are based upon our experience, business plans, economic and market trends and available industry data. While management believes that its methodology for developing such assumptions is reasonable, there can be no assurance that modeled results will be achieved.
Furthermore, the metrics are based upon the Balance Sheet structure as of the valuation date and do not reflect the planned growth or management actions that could be taken.

RISK MANAGEMENT
As a financial institution, we take on a certain amount of risk in every business decision, transaction and activity. Our Board of Directors and senior management have identified seven major categories of risk: credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, reputational risk, operational risk, legal and compliance risk and strategic risk. In its oversight role of our risk management function, the Board of Directors focuses on the strategies, analyses and conclusions of management relating to identifying, understanding and managing risks so as to optimize total stockholder value, while balancing prudent business and safety and soundness considerations.
The Board of Directors adopted a risk appetite statement that defines acceptable risk levels and limits under which we seek to operate in order to optimize returns. As such, the board monitors a series of KRIs, or Key Risk Indicators, for various business lines, operational units, and risk categories, providing insight into how our performance aligns with our stated risk appetite. These results are reviewed periodically by the Board of Directors and senior management to ensure adherence to our risk appetite statement, and where appropriate, adjustments are made to applicable business strategies and tactics where risks are approaching stated tolerances or for emerging risks.
We support our risk management process through a governance structure involving our Board of Directors and senior management. The joint Risk Committee of our Board of Directors and the FNBPA Board of Directors helps ensure that business decisions are executed within appropriate risk tolerances. The Risk Committee has oversight responsibilities with respect to the following:
 
identification, measurement, assessment and monitoring of enterprise-wide risk;
development of appropriate and meaningful risk metrics to use in connection with the oversight of our businesses and strategies;
review and assessment of our policies and practices to manage our credit, market, liquidity, legal, regulatory and operating risk (including technology, operational, compliance and fiduciary risks); and
identification and implementation of risk management best practices.
The Risk Committee serves as the primary point of contact between our Board of Directors and the Risk Management Council, which is the senior management level committee responsible for risk management. Risk appetite is an integral element of our business and capital planning processes through our Board Risk Committee and Risk Management Council. We use our risk appetite processes to promote appropriate alignment of risk, capital and performance tactics, while also considering risk capacity and appetite constraints from both financial and non-financial risks. Our top-down risk appetite process serves as a limit for undue risk-taking for bottom-up planning from our various business functions. Our Board Risk Committee, in collaboration with our Risk Management Council, approves our risk appetite on an annual basis, or more frequently, as needed to reflect changes in the risk environment, with the goal of ensuring that our risk appetite remains consistent with our strategic plans and business operations, regulatory environment and our shareholders' expectations. Reports relating to our risk appetite and strategic plans, and our ongoing monitoring thereof, are regularly presented to our various management level risk oversight and planning committees and periodically reported up through our Board Risk Committee.
As noted above, we have a Risk Management Council comprised of senior management. The purpose of this committee is to provide regular oversight of specific areas of risk with respect to the level of risk and risk management structure. Management has also established an Operational Risk Committee that is responsible for identifying, evaluating and monitoring operational risks across FNB, evaluating and approving appropriate remediation efforts to address identified operational risks and providing periodic reports concerning operational risks to the Risk Management Council. The Risk Management Council reports on a regular basis to the Risk Committee of our Board of Directors regarding our enterprise-wide risk profile and other significant risk management issues. Our Chief Risk Officer is responsible for the design and implementation of our enterprise-wide risk management strategy and framework through the multiple second line of defense areas, including the following

72

Table of Contents                             

departments: Enterprise-Wide Risk Management, Fraud Risk, Loan Review, Model Risk Management, Third-Party Risk Management, Anti-Money Laundering and Bank Secrecy Act, Appraisal Review, Compliance and Information and Cyber Security. All second line of defense departments report to the Chief Risk Officer to ensure the coordinated and consistent implementation of risk management initiatives and strategies on a day-to-day basis. Our Enterprise-Wide Risk Management Department conducts risk and control assessments across all of our business and operational areas to ensure the appropriate risk identification, risk management and reporting of risks enterprise-wide. The Fraud Risk Department monitors for internal and external fraud risk across all of our business and operational units. The Loan Review Department conducts independent testing of our loan risk ratings to ensure their accuracy, which is instrumental to calculating our allowance for credit losses. Our Model Risk Management Department oversees validation and testing of all models used in managing risk across our company. Our Third-Party Risk Management Department ensures effective risk management and oversight of third-party relationships throughout the vendor life cycle. The Anti-Money Laundering and Bank Secrecy Act Department monitors for compliance with money laundering risk and associated regulatory compliance requirements. The Appraisal Review Department facilitates independent ordering and review of real estate appraisals obtained for determining the value of real estate pledged as collateral for loans to customers. Our Compliance Department is responsible for developing policies and procedures and monitoring compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Our Information and Cyber Security Department is responsible for maintaining a risk assessment of our information and cyber security risks and ensuring appropriate controls are in place to manage and control such risks, through the use of the National Institute of Standards and Technology framework for improving critical infrastructure by measuring and evaluating the effectiveness of information and cyber security controls. Further, our audit function performs an independent assessment of our internal controls environment and plays an integral role in testing the operation of the internal controls systems and reporting findings to management and our Audit Committee. Both the Risk Committee and Audit Committee of our Board of Directors regularly report on risk-related matters to the full Board of Directors. In addition, both the Risk Committee of our Board of Directors and our Risk Management Council regularly assess our enterprise-wide risk profile and provide guidance on actions needed to address key and emerging risk issues.
The Board of Directors believes that our enterprise-wide risk management process is effective and enables the Board of Directors to:
 
assess the quality of the information we receive;
understand the businesses, investments and financial, accounting, legal, regulatory and strategic considerations and the risks that we face;
oversee and assess how senior management evaluates risk; and
assess appropriately the quality of our enterprise-wide risk management process.

RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS TO GAAP
Reconciliations of non-GAAP operating measures and key performance indicators discussed in this Report to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included in the following tables.
TABLE 22
Operating Net Income Available to Common Stockholders
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(in thousands)
2019
 
2018
Net income available to common stockholders
$
92,117

 
$
84,752

Branch consolidation costs
1,634

 

Tax benefit of branch consolidation costs
(343
)
 

Operating net income available to common stockholders (non-GAAP)
$
93,408

 
$
84,752

The table above shows how operating net income available to common stockholders (non-GAAP) is derived from amounts reported in our financial statements. We believe certain charges, such as branch consolidation costs, are not organic costs to run our operations and facilities. The branch consolidation charges principally represent expenses to satisfy contractual obligations of the closed branches without any useful ongoing benefit to us. These costs are specific to each individual transaction, and may vary significantly based on the size and complexity of the transaction.

73

Table of Contents                             

TABLE 23
Operating Earnings per Diluted Common Share
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
2019
 
2018
Net income per diluted common share
$
0.28

 
$
0.26

Branch consolidation costs
0.01

 

Tax benefit of branch consolidation costs

 

Operating earnings per diluted common share (non-GAAP)
$
0.29

 
$
0.26

TABLE 24
Return on Average Tangible Common Equity
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2019
 
2018
Net income available to common stockholders (annualized)
$
373,586

 
$
343,716

Amortization of intangibles, net of tax (annualized)
11,146

 
13,513

Tangible net income available to common stockholders (annualized) (non-GAAP)
$
384,732

 
$
357,229

Average total stockholders’ equity
$
4,652,243

 
$
4,430,269

Less: Average preferred stockholders' equity
(106,882
)
 
(106,882
)
Less: Average intangibles (1)
(2,331,623
)
 
(2,339,783
)
Average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
$
2,213,738

 
$
1,983,604

Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
17.38
%
 
18.01
%
 (1) Excludes loan servicing rights.
TABLE 25
Return on Average Tangible Assets
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2019
 
2018
Net income (annualized)
$
381,737

 
$
351,867

Amortization of intangibles, net of tax (annualized)
11,146

 
13,513

Tangible net income (annualized) (non-GAAP)
$
392,883

 
$
365,380

Average total assets
$
33,390,202

 
$
31,494,506

Less: Average intangibles (1)
(2,331,623
)
 
(2,339,783
)
Average tangible assets (non-GAAP)
$
31,058,579

 
$
29,154,723

Return on average tangible assets (non-GAAP)
1.26
%
 
1.25
%
(1) Excludes loan servicing rights.

74

Table of Contents                             

TABLE 26
Tangible Book Value per Common Share
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)
2019
 
2018
Total stockholders’ equity
$
4,679,959

 
$
4,433,453

Less: Preferred stockholders’ equity
(106,882
)
 
(106,882
)
Less: Intangibles (1)
(2,329,896
)
 
(2,339,139
)
Tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
$
2,243,181

 
$
1,987,432

Ending common shares outstanding
324,515,913

 
323,686,993

Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP)
$
6.91

 
$
6.14

 (1) Excludes loan servicing rights.
TABLE 27
Tangible equity to tangible assets (period-end)
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2019
 
2018
Total stockholders' equity
$
4,679,959

 
$
4,433,453

Less:  Intangibles(1)
(2,329,896
)
 
(2,339,139
)
Tangible equity (non-GAAP)
$
2,350,063

 
$
2,094,314

Total assets
$
33,695,411

 
$
31,652,353

Less:  Intangibles(1)
(2,329,896
)
 
(2,339,139
)
Tangible assets (non-GAAP)
$
31,365,515

 
$
29,313,214

Tangible equity / tangible assets (period-end) (non-GAAP)
7.49
%
 
7.14
%
(1) Excludes loan servicing rights.
TABLE 28
Tangible common equity / tangible assets (period-end)
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2019
 
2018
Total stockholders' equity
$
4,679,959

 
$
4,433,453

Less:  Preferred stockholders' equity
(106,882
)
 
(106,882
)
Less:  Intangibles (1)
(2,329,896
)
 
(2,339,139
)
Tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
$
2,243,181

 
$
1,987,432

Total assets
$
33,695,411

 
$
31,652,353

Less:  Intangibles(1)
(2,329,896
)
 
(2,339,139
)
Tangible assets (non-GAAP)
$
31,365,515

 
$
29,313,214

Tangible common equity / tangible assets (period-end) (non-GAAP)
7.15
%
 
6.78
%
 (1) Excludes loan servicing rights.

75

Table of Contents                             

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TABLE 29
Efficiency Ratio
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2019
 
2018
Non-interest expense
$
165,742

 
$
171,083

Less: Amortization of intangibles
(3,479
)
 
(4,218
)
Less: OREO expense
(1,069
)
 
(1,367
)
Less: Branch consolidation costs
(458
)
 

Adjusted non-interest expense
$
160,736

 
$
165,498

Net interest income
$
230,593

 
$
226,105

Taxable equivalent adjustment
3,579

 
3,103

Non-interest income
65,385

 
67,503

Less: Branch consolidation costs
1,176

 

Adjusted net interest income (FTE) + non-interest income
$
300,733

 
$
296,711

Efficiency ratio (FTE) (non-GAAP)
53.45
%
 
55.78
%

ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information called for by this item is provided in the Market Risk section of "MD&A," which is included in Item 2 of this Report, and is incorporated herein by reference. There are no material changes in the information provided under Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” included in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019.
 
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. FNB’s management, with the participation of our principal executive and financial officers, evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date at the reasonable assurance level as discussed below to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
LIMITATIONS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS. FNB’s management, including the CEO and the CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within FNB have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. In addition, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS. The CEO and the CFO have evaluated the changes to our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2019, as required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a–15

76

Table of Contents                             

and 15d–15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and have concluded that there were no such changes that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information required by this Item is set forth in the “Other Legal Proceedings” discussion in Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item.
 
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
For information regarding risk factors that could affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, see the risk factors disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. See also Part I, Item 2 (MD&A) of this Report.
There are no material changes from any of the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019.

ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
NONE
 
ITEM 3.
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
NONE
 
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable.

ITEM 5.
OTHER INFORMATION
NONE
 

77

Table of Contents                             

ITEM 6.    EXHIBITS
Exhibit Index
Exhibit Number
 
Description
10.1
 
 
 
 
10.2
 
 
 
 
10.3
 
 
 
 
31.1.
 
 
 
 
31.2.
 
 
 
 
32.1.
 
 
 
 
32.2.
 
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (filed herewith).
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (filed herewith).



78

Table of Contents                             

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
 
F.N.B. Corporation
 
 
 
 
 
Dated:
 
May 7, 2019
 
/s/ Vincent J. Delie, Jr.
 
 
 
 
 
Vincent J. Delie, Jr.
 
 
 
 
 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
Dated:
 
May 7, 2019
 
/s/ Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.
 
 
 
 
 
Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.
 
 
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
Dated:
 
May 7, 2019
 
/s/ James L. Dutey
 
 
 
 
 
James L. Dutey
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate Controller
 
 
 
 
 
(Principal Accounting Officer)


79