GTJ REIT, INC. - Quarter Report: 2019 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019

or

For the transition period from                      to                      

Commission file number: 333-136110

GTJ REIT, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

60 Hempstead Avenue

West Hempstead, New York

11552

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(516) 693-5500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No   ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 13,537,856 shares of common stock as of August 6, 2019.

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1

Part I – Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(amounts in thousands, except share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS:

GTJ REIT, Inc. (the “Company” or “GTJ REIT”) was incorporated on June 26, 2006, under the Maryland General Corporation Law. The Company is focused primarily on the acquisition, ownership, management, and operation of commercial real estate located in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Delaware.

The Company has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company elected December 31 as its fiscal year end. Under the REIT operating structure, the Company is permitted to deduct the dividends paid to its stockholders when determining its taxable income. Assuming dividends equal or exceed the Company’s taxable income, the Company generally will not be required to pay federal corporate income taxes on such income.

On January 17, 2013, the Company closed on a transaction with Wu/Lighthouse Portfolio, LLC, in which a limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) owned and controlled by the Company, acquired all outstanding ownership interests of a portfolio consisting of 25 commercial properties (the “Acquired Properties”) located in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, in exchange for 33.29% of the outstanding limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. The outstanding limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership exchanged for the Acquired Properties was increased to 33.78% due to post-closing adjustments, and to 34.67% due to the redemption of certain shares of GTJ REIT, Inc. common stock. The acquisition was recorded as a business combination and, accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value. At June 30, 2019, subject to certain anti-dilutive and other provisions contained in the governing agreements, the limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership may be converted in the aggregate, into approximately 1.9 million shares of the Company’s common stock and approximately 5.3 million shares of the Company’s Series B preferred stock.

As of June 30, 2019, the Operating Partnership owned and operated 48 properties consisting of approximately 5.8 million square feet of primarily industrial space on approximately 389 acres of land in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Delaware. The Operating Partnership also owns, through a joint venture, a 50% interest in a newly constructed state-of-the-art industrial building in Piscataway, New Jersey.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Basis of Presentation:

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and include the financial statements of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and the Operating Partnership, as the Company makes all operating and financial decisions for (i.e., exercises control over) the Operating Partnership. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The ownership interests of the other investors in the Operating Partnership are presented as non-controlling interests.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial information has been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such rules and regulations. The Company’s management believes that the disclosures presented in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In management’s opinion, all adjustments and eliminations, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the reported periods have been included. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial information should be read in conjunction with the Company’s December 31, 2018, audited consolidated financial statements, as previously filed with the SEC on Form 10-K on March 28, 2019, and other public information.

The Company has determined that redemptions of Company shares result in a reallocation between the Operating Partnership’s non-controlling interest (“OP NCI”) and Additional Paid-in-Capital (“APIC”). During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company decreased its APIC with an offsetting increase to OP NCI of approximately $0.3 million.

6

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. All of these estimates reflect management’s best judgment about current economic and market conditions and their effects based on information available as of the date of these condensed consolidated financial statements. If such conditions persist longer or deteriorate further than expected, it is reasonably possible that the judgments and estimates could change, which may result in impairments of certain assets. Significant estimates include the useful lives of long lived assets including property, equipment and intangible assets, impairment of assets, collectability of receivables, contingencies, stock-based compensation, and fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations.

Reclassification:

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations.

Real Estate:

Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. All costs related to the improvement or replacement of real estate properties, including interest expense on development properties, are capitalized. Additions, renovations, and improvements that enhance and/or extend the useful life of a property are also capitalized. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance, repairs, and improvements that do not materially prolong the normal useful life of an asset are charged to operations as incurred.

The Company capitalizes all direct costs of real estate under development until the end of the development period.  In addition, the Company capitalizes the indirect cost of insurance and real estate taxes allocable to real estate under development during the development period. The Company also capitalizes interest using the avoided cost method for real estate under development during the development period. The Company will cease the capitalization of these costs when development activities are substantially completed and the property is available for occupancy by tenants, but no later than one year from the completion of major construction activity at which time the property is placed in service and depreciation commences. If the Company suspends substantially all activities related to development of a qualifying asset, the Company will cease capitalization of these costs until activities are resumed.

Upon the acquisition of real estate properties, the fair value of the real estate purchased is allocated to the acquired tangible assets (generally consisting of land, buildings and building improvements, and tenant improvements) and identified intangible assets and liabilities (generally consisting of above-market and below-market leases and the origination value of in-place leases) in accordance with GAAP. We utilize methods similar to those used by independent appraisers in estimating the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities.  The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property “as-if-vacant.” In allocating the purchase price to identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, the value of above-market and below-market leases is estimated based on the differences between contractual rentals and estimated market rents over the applicable lease term discounted back to the date of acquisition utilizing a discount rate adjusted for the credit risk associated with the respective tenants. The aggregate value of in-place leases is measured based on the avoided costs associated with lack of revenue over a market oriented lease-up period, the avoided leasing commissions, and other avoided costs common in similar leasing transactions.

Mortgage notes payable assumed in connection with acquisitions are recorded at their fair value using current market interest rates for similar debt at the time of acquisitions. Effective 2018, acquisition related costs are capitalized. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases. The value of in-place leases is based on the Company’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during expected lease-up periods, current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. The values of in-place leases are amortized over the remaining term of the respective leases. If a tenant terminates its lease prior to its contractual expiration date, any unamortized balance of the related intangible assets or liabilities is recorded as income or expense in the period. The total net impact to rental revenues due to the amortization of above and below-market leases was a net increase of approximately $0.3 million for each of the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

7

As of June 30, 2019, above-market and in-place leases of approximately $1.0 million and $9.8 million (net of accumulated amortization), respectively, are included in acquired lease intangible assets, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2018, above-market and in-place leases of approximately $1.1 million and $10.9 million (net of accumulated amortization), respectively, are included in acquired lease intangible assets, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, approximately $4.6 million and $5.0 million (net of accumulated amortization), respectively, relating to below-market leases are included in acquired lease intangible liabilities, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The following table presents the projected impact for the remainder of 2019, the next five years and thereafter related to the net increase to rental revenue from the amortization of the acquired above-market and below-market lease intangibles and the increase to amortization expense of the in-place lease intangibles for properties owned at June 30, 2019 (in thousands):

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates:

The Company has investments in other entities that have been accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The equity method of accounting is used when an investor has influence, but not control, over the investee. The Company records its share of the profits and losses of the investee in the period when theses profits and losses are also reflected in the accounts of the investee.

On February 28, 2018, the Company purchased a 50% interest in Two CPS Developers LLC (the “Investee”) for $5.25 million. The Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the Investee, does not have a controlling interest in the Investee, and the Investee is not a variable interest entity. Therefore, the Company accounts for this investment under the equity method of accounting. The Company recorded income of approximately $0.1 million from this investment for the six months ended June 30, 2019. The Company did not record any income or loss from this investment for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as the property owned by the Investee was under development.

Depreciation and Amortization:

The Company uses the straight-line method for depreciation and amortization. Properties and property improvements are depreciated over their estimated useful lives, which range from 5 to 40 years. Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are depreciated over estimated useful lives that range from 5 to 10 years. Tenant improvements are amortized over the shorter of the remaining non-cancellable term of the related leases or their useful lives.

Asset Impairment:

Management reviews each real estate investment for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a real estate investment may not be recoverable. The review of recoverability is based on an estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows that are expected to result from the real estate investment’s use and eventual disposition. Such cash flow analyses consider factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If an impairment event exists due to the projected inability to recover the carrying value of a real estate investment, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value. Management is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of the Company’s real estate holdings. These assessments could have a direct impact on net income, because an impairment loss is recognized in the period the assessment is made. Management has determined that there was no impairment related to its long-lived assets at June 30, 2019.

8

Deferred Charges:

Deferred charges consist principally of leasing commissions, which are amortized over the life of the related tenant leases, and financing costs, which are amortized over the terms of the respective debt agreements. Deferred financing costs relating to the secured revolving credit facility and deferred leasing charges are included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Deferred financing costs related to mortgage notes payable are included as a reduction of mortgage notes payable, net on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Reportable Segments:

The Company operates in one reportable segment, commercial real estate.

Revenue Recognition:

Rental income includes the base rent that each tenant is required to pay in accordance with the terms of their respective leases reported on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. In order for management to determine, in its judgment, that the unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectible, management reviews billed and unbilled rent receivables on a quarterly basis and takes into consideration the tenant’s payment history and financial condition. Some of the leases provide for additional contingent rental revenue in the form of increases based on the consumer price index, subject to certain maximums and minimums.

Substantially all of the Company’s properties are subject to long-term net leases under which the tenant is typically responsible to pay for its pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance, and ordinary maintenance and repairs.

Property operating expense recoveries from tenants of common area maintenance, real estate taxes, and other recoverable costs are included in revenues in the period that the related expenses are incurred.

Earnings Per Share Information:

The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower per share amount. Restricted stock and stock options were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash:

Restricted cash includes a construction bond and reserves used to pay real estate taxes, repairs, leasing costs and capital improvements. Restricted cash for prior periods included an additional reserve to pay for insurance costs.

Fair Value Measurement:

The Company determines fair value in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement.” This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity.

9

Assets and liabilities disclosed at fair values are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, which are defined by ASC 820-10-35, are directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities. Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment, and the Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter. The three-tier fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 — Valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 — Valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants. These valuations require significant judgment.

Income Taxes:

The Company is organized and conducts its operations to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Company is generally not subject to federal income taxation on the portion of its distributable income that qualifies as REIT taxable income, to the extent that it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders and complies with certain other requirements as defined in the Code.

The Company also participates in certain activities conducted by entities which elected to be treated as taxable subsidiaries under the Code. As such, the Company is subject to federal, state, and local taxes on the income from these activities.

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method as required by the provisions of ASC 740-10-30. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not.

ASC 740-10-65 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under ASC 740-10-65, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC 740-10-65 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, the Company had determined that no liabilities are required in connection with uncertain tax positions. As of June 30, 2019, the Company’s tax returns for the prior three years are subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service. Any interest and penalties would be expensed as incurred.

The recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) is a complex revision to the U.S. federal income tax laws with impacts on different categories of taxpayers and industries, and requires subsequent rulemaking and interpretation in a number of areas. The Act may impact certain of our tenants’ operating results, financial condition, and future business plans. There can be no assurance that the Act will not impact our operating results, financial condition, and future business operations.

Concentrations of Credit Risk:

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, which from time-to-time exceed the federal depository insurance coverage. Beginning January 1, 2013, all interest and noninterest bearing transaction accounts deposited at an insured depository institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to the standard maximum deposit amount of $250,000. Management believes that the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk due to the credit worthiness of the financial institutions.

Annual contractual rent of $9.7 million derived from five leases with the City of New York, represents approximately 22% of the Company’s total 2019 contractual rental income.

10

Stock-Based Compensation:

The Company has a stock-based compensation plan which is described below in Note 5. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” which establishes accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for employee services. Under the provisions of ASC 718, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date or service-inception date (if it precedes the grant date), based on the fair value of the award. Share-based compensation is expensed at the grant date (for awards or portion of awards that vested immediately), or ratably over the respective vesting periods, determined from the start of the grant date or service-inception date through the date of vesting.

New Accounting Pronouncements:

Lease Accounting

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic No. 842).” ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize, at the commencement date, a lease liability for all leases with a term greater than 12 months, which is the lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease and measure it on a discounted basis. A lessee must recognize an asset when it represents a lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. The new lease accounting permits companies to utilize certain practical expedients in the implementation of the new standard. The Company has elected to utilize a package of three practical expedients together for all leases which includes, (i) not reassessing expired or existing contracts as to whether they are or contain leases; (ii) not reassessing lease classification of existing leases; and (iii) not reassessing the amount of capitalized initial direct costs for existing leases. ASU 2016-02 also specifies that upon adoption, lessors will no longer be able to capitalize and amortize certain leasing related costs and instead will only be permitted to capitalize and amortize incremental direct leasing costs. As a result, we have concluded that subsequent to adoption, there will be no change in the capitalization of costs as compared to what we have historically capitalized. ASU 2016-02 initially provided for one retrospective transition method for lessors; however, a second transition method was subsequently provided by ASU 2018-11 as described below.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements,” which amended ASU 2016-02 to provide entities with an additional optional transition method to adopt ASU 2016-02. ASU 2018-11 simplifies transition requirements and, for lessors, provides a practical expedient for the separation of non-lease components from lease components. Specifically, ASU 2018-11 provides an option to apply the transition provisions of the new standard at its adoption date instead of at the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. In addition, ASU 2018-11 provides a practical expedient, by class of underlying asset, that permits lessors to make a policy election not to separate non-lease components from the associated lease component, and, instead, to account for those components as a single component if the non-lease components would otherwise be accounted for under the new revenue guidance (Topic 606). If certain conditions are met, the single component will be accounted for under either Topic 842 or Topic 606 depending on which component(s) are predominant.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-10, “Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases.” These amendments provide clarifications and corrections to ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842).

In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-20, “Leases, (Topic 842): Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors”. These amendments clarify or simplify certain narrow aspects of ASC 842 for lessors. This ASU modifies ASU No. 2016-02 to permit lessors, as an accounting policy election, not to evaluate whether certain sales taxes and other similar taxes are lessor costs or lessee costs. Instead, those lessors will account for those costs as if they are lessee costs. Consequently, a lessor making this election will exclude from the consideration in the contract and from variable payments not included in the consideration in the contract all collections from lessees of taxes within the scope of the election and will provide certain disclosures (the accounting policy election includes sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes but excludes real estate taxes). The Company has elected not to evaluate whether the aforementioned costs are lessor or lessee costs. This ASU also provides that certain lessor costs require lessors to exclude from variable payments, and therefore revenue, specifically lessor costs paid by lessees directly to third parties. The amendments also require lessors to account for costs excluded from the consideration of a contract that are paid by the lessor and reimbursed by the lessee as variable payments. A lessor will record those reimbursed costs as revenue. The adoption of ASU 2018-20 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal periods and interim periods within those fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2018.  Early adoption was permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 (as amended by subsequent ASUs) effective January 1, 2019 utilizing the new transition method described in ASU 2018-11 and the package of three practical expedients provided by ASU 2016-02 as described above. As lessor, the Company has more than sixty (60) leases primarily with industrial tenants and a significant majority of its leases are on a triple-net basis. The Company anticipates that all of its leases will continue to be classified as operating leases and the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will not have a material impact on revenues. The Company has elected to use the practical

11

expedient related to the separation of lease and non-lease components provided by ASU 2018-11. The Company has determined that the effect of electing this lessor practical expedient is that revenues related to leases will be reported on one line in the presentation within the statement of income. The timing of revenue recognition is expected to be the same for the majority of the Company’s new leases as compared to similar existing leases. As lessee, the Company has elected to utilize the practical expedients in the implementation of ASU 2016-02 related to not separating non-lease components from the associated lease component. As lessee, the Company is a party to an office lease with future lease obligations aggregating to approximately $431,000 and $568,000 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The Company has recorded a right-of-use asset and corresponding right-of use liability at the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments, based upon an incremental borrowing rate of 5.256%, as of January 1, 2019. The Company did not record any cumulative effect of change in accounting principle upon the adoption of ASC Topic 842 as lessor or lessee. However, in the consolidated statement of operations, tenant reimbursements for the prior reporting period have been included in rental income to conform with the presentation for the current reporting period.

Future minimum contractual lease payments to be received by the Company (without taking into account straight-line rent, amortization of intangibles and tenant reimbursements) as of June 30, 2019, under operating leases for the remainder of 2019, the next five years, and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

Other Accounting Topics

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-09, “Codification Improvements.” These amendments provide clarifications and corrections to certain ASC subtopics including the following: 220-10 (Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Overall), 470-50 (Debt – Modifications and Extinguishments), 480-10 (Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity – Overall), 718-740 (Compensation – Stock Compensation – Income Taxes), 805-740 (Business Combinations – Income Taxes), 815-10 (Derivatives and Hedging – Overall), and 820-10 (Fair Value Measurement – Overall). Some of the amendments in ASU 2018-09 do not require transition guidance and are effective upon issuance; however, many of the amendments do not have transition guidance with effective dates for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The adoption of ASU 2018-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) – Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” These amendments provide specific guidance for transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees and specify that Topic 718 applies to all share-based payment transactions in which a grantor acquires goods or services to be used or consumed in a grantor’s own operations by issuing share-based payment awards. The amendments also clarify that Topic 718 does not apply to share-based payments used to effectively provide (i) financing to the issuer or (ii) awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or services to customers as part of a contract accounted for under Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. Early adoption was permitted but not earlier than the adoption of Topic 606. The adoption of ASU 2018-07 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-05, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118”, which allowed public companies to record provisional amounts in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2017 due to the complexities involved in accounting for the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. ASU 2018-05 was effective upon issuance. The Company did not recognize any estimated income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in its 2017 consolidated financial statements in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118.

12

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Scope of Modification Accounting.” ASU 2017-09 clarifies Topic 718 such that an entity must apply modification accounting to changes in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award unless all of the following criteria are met: (a) the fair value of the modified award is the same as the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification, (b) the vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the modification, and (c) the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the modification. The amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. The adoption of ASU 2017-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, “Other Income – Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20) - Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets.” ASU 2017-05 was issued to clarify the scope of Subtopic 610-20 and to add guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets, including partial sales of real estate. ASU 2017-05 clarifies the scope of Subtopic 610-20 by defining the term “in substance nonfinancial asset.” If substantially all of the fair value of the assets (recognized and unrecognized) promised to a counterparty in a contract is concentrated in nonfinancial assets, a financial asset in the same arrangement would still be considered part of an “in substance nonfinancial asset”. Additionally, ASU 2017-05 indicates an entity should identify each distinct nonfinancial asset (e.g., real estate and inventory) or in substance nonfinancial asset promised to a counterparty and derecognize each asset when a counterparty obtains control of it. ASU 2017-05 requires an entity to derecognize a distinct nonfinancial asset or distinct in substance nonfinancial asset in a partial sale transaction when two criteria are met: 1) the entity does not have (or ceases to have) a controlling financial interest in the legal entity that holds the asset in accordance with Topic 810, and 2) the entity transfers control of the asset in accordance with Topic 606. The effective date and transition requirements of ASU 2017-05 are the same as Topic 606.  The amendments are effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The adoption of ASU 2017-05 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” ASU 2017-01 provides new guidance that changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. The guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets is not a business. ASU 2017-01 also requires a business to include at least one substantive process.  ASU 2017-01 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and has been adopted by the Company effective January 1, 2018. It is expected that the standard will reduce the number of future real estate acquisitions accounted for as a business combination and therefore, reduce the amount of acquisition costs that will be expensed. The adoption of ASU 2017-01 will result in a reduction of expensed acquisition costs and a corresponding increase to net income. There were no acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash.” ASU 2016-18 updates Topic 230 to require cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total cash amounts on the statement of cash flows. Consequently, transfers between cash and restricted cash will not be presented as a separate line item in the operating, investing or financing sections of the cash flow statement. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years and were applied retrospectively.   

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU 2016-15 clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments are intended to reduce diversity in practice. The ASU contains additional guidance clarifying when an entity should separate cash receipts and cash payments and classify them into more than one class of cash flows (including when reasonable judgment is required to estimate and allocate cash flows) versus when an entity should classify the aggregate amount into one class of cash flows on the basis of predominance. The amendments are effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration an entity expects to receive for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. ASU 2014-09 does not apply to the Company’s lease revenues but will apply to reimbursed tenant costs.  Additionally, this guidance modifies disclosures

13

regarding the nature, timing, amount and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year, until fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted but not before fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2016. Entities may adopt ASU 2014-09 using either a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients or a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect recognized at the date of adoption. ASU 2014-09 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company believes that the majority of its revenue falls outside the scope of this guidance and does not anticipate any significant changes to the timing of the Company’s revenue recognition. The Company implemented the standard using the modified retrospective approach. However, there was no cumulative effect recognized in retained earnings at the date of application.

3. MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE:

The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s mortgage notes payable (in thousands):

People’s United Bank Loan Agreement:

In connection with the acquisition in 2014 of an 84,000 square foot parking lot in Long Island City, Queens, NY, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into a mortgage loan agreement with People’s United Bank in the aggregate amount of $15.5 million.  The loan has a ten-year term and bears interest at 4.18%. Payments for the first seven years are interest only. Payments over the remaining three years of the term are based on a 25-year amortization schedule, with a balloon payment of $14.4 million due at maturity.

American International Group Loan Agreement:

On February 20, 2015 (the “Loan Closing Date”), the Operating Partnership refinanced the current outstanding debt on certain properties and placed new financing on others by entering into a Loan Agreement (the “AIG Loan Agreement”) with American General Life Insurance Company, the Variable Life Insurance Company, the United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, American Home Assurance Company and Commerce and Industry Insurance Company.  

The AIG Loan Agreement provides a secured loan in the principal amount of $233.1 million (the “AIG Loan”). The AIG Loan is a 10-year term loan that requires interest-only payments at the rate of 4.05% per annum. During the period from April 1, 2015, to February 1, 2025, payments of interest-only will be payable in arrears with the entire principal balance plus any accrued and unpaid interest due and payable on March 1, 2025. The Operating Partnership’s obligation to pay the interest, principal and other amounts under the Loan Agreement are evidenced by the secured promissory notes executed on the Loan Closing Date (the “AIG Notes”). The AIG Notes are secured by certain mortgages encumbering 28 properties in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.

Allstate Loan Agreement:

On March 13, 2015, in connection with the acquisition of six properties in Piscataway, NJ, the Operating Partnership closed on a $39.1 million cross-collateralized mortgage (the “Allstate Loan”) from Allstate Life Insurance Company, Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York and American Heritage Life Insurance Company. The Allstate Loan agreement provided a secured facility with a 10-year term loan. During the first three years of the term of the loan, it required interest-only payments at the rate of 4% per annum. Following this period until the loan matures on April 1, 2025, payments will be based on a 30-year amortization schedule with a balloon payment of $33.8 million due at maturity.

14

United States Life Insurance Company Loan Agreement:

On December 20, 2017 (the “Closing Date”), four wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership (collectively, the “U.S. Life Borrowers”) entered in a loan agreement (the “U.S. Life Loan Agreement”) with the United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York (the “Lender”).

The U.S. Life Loan Agreement provides for a secured loan facility in the principal amount of $39.0 million (the “Loan Facility”). The Loan Facility is a 10-year term loan that requires interest-only payments at the rate of 3.82% per annum. During the period from February 1, 2018 to December 1, 2027, payments of interest only on the principal balance of the Note (as defined below) will be payable in arrears, with the entire principal balance due and payable on January 1, 2028, the loan maturity date. Subject to certain conditions, the U.S Life Borrowers may prepay the outstanding loan amount in whole on or after January 1, 2023, by providing advance notice of the prepayment to the Lender and remitting a prepayment premium equal to the greater of 1% of the then outstanding principal amount of the Loan Facility or the then present value of the Note.  The U.S Life Borrowers paid the Lender a one-time application fee of $50,000 in connection with the Loan Facility.  The U.S. Life Borrowers’ obligation to pay the principal, interest and other amounts under the Loan Facility are evidenced by the secured promissory note executed by the U.S. Life Borrowers as of the Closing Date (the “Note”). The Note is secured by certain mortgages encumbering the U.S Life Borrowers’ properties (a total of four properties) located in New York, New Jersey and Delaware.  In the event of default, the initial rate of interest on the Note will increase to the greatest of (i) 18% per annum, (ii) a per annum rate equal to 4% over the prime established rate, or (iii) a per annum rate equal to 5% over the original interest rate, all subject to the applicable state or federal laws.  The Note contains other terms and provisions that are customary for instruments of this nature.  Approximately $37.5 million from the loan proceeds were used to reduce the Company’s obligation under its secured revolving credit facility with Key Bank.

United States Life Insurance Company Loan Agreement:

On March 21, 2018, four wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership refinanced the current outstanding debt on certain properties by entering into a loan agreement with the United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York. The loan agreement provides for a secured loan facility in the principal amount of $33.0 million. The loan facility is a ten-year term loan that requires interest-only payments at the rate of 4.25% per annum on the principal balance for the first five years of the term and principal and interest payments (amortized over a 30-year period) during the second five years of the term. The remaining principal balance of $30.0 million is due and payable on April 1, 2028, the loan maturity date. The Company used a portion of the proceeds from the loan facility to repay the remaining balance of a mortgage loan from Genworth Life Insurance Company.

Assumption of Loans:

Certain of the Company’s acquired properties were encumbered by certain mortgage indebtedness. Concurrent with the acquisition of these properties, the Company, the Operating Partnership and the entity owners of the properties acquired entered into certain loan assumption and modification documents to facilitate the acquisition of the properties acquired. Below is a summary of the material terms of the arrangement with each lender.

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Loan:

In connection with the April 2014 acquisition of the Windsor Locks, CT property, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership assumed a $9.0 million mortgage that bore interest at 6.07%.  A principal payment of $3.0 million was made in February 2017, and the interest rate was reduced to 5.20%. The balance of the loan matures March 2020.

People’s United Bank Loan:

Wu/LH 15 Progress Drive L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, entered into a $2.7 million mortgage loan on September 30, 2010. The loan is secured by the properties located at 15 Progress Road and 30 Commerce Drive, Shelton, Connecticut and bears interest at a rate of 5.23%. The Operating Partnership is required to make monthly payments of principal and interest until the loan matures on October 1, 2020. The obligations under this loan agreement are also guaranteed by GTJ REIT.

In connection with the loan agreements, the Company is required to comply with certain covenants. As of June 30, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.

15

The mortgage notes payable are collateralized by certain properties and require monthly interest payments until maturity and are generally non-recourse. Some of the loans also require amortization of principal. As of June 30, 2019, scheduled principal repayments for the remainder of 2019, the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

4. SECURED REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY:

On December 2, 2015, the Operating Partnership entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Key Bank Credit Agreement”) with Keybank National Association and Keybanc Capital Markets Inc., as lead arranger (collectively, “Key Bank”). The Key Bank Credit Agreement contemplated a $50.0 million revolving line of credit facility, with an initial term of two years, with a one-year extension option, subject to certain other customary conditions.

Loans drawn down by the Operating Partnership under the facility will need to specify, at the Operating Partnership’s option, whether they are base-rate loans or LIBOR-rate loans. The base-rate loans initially bore a base rate of interest calculated as the greater of: (a) the fluctuating annual rate of interest announced from time to time by Key Bank as its “prime rate,” (b) 0.5% above the rate announced by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (or Federal Funds Effective Rate), or (c) LIBOR plus 100 basis points (bps). The LIBOR-rate loans initially bore interest at a rate of LIBOR rate plus 300 to 350 bps, depending upon the overall leverage of the properties. Each revolving credit loan under the facility will be evidenced by separate promissory note(s). The Operating Partnership agreed to pay to Key Bank a facility unused fee in the amount calculated as 0.30% for usage less than 50% and 0.20% for usage 50% or greater, calculated as a per diem rate, multiplied by the excess of the total commitment over the outstanding principal amount of the loans under the facility at the time of the calculation. Key Bank has the right to reduce the amount of loan commitments under the facility provided that, among other things, they give an advance written notice of such reductions and that in no event the total commitment under the facility is less than $25.0 million. The Operating Partnership may at its option convert any of the revolving credit loans into a revolving credit loan of another type which loan will then bear interest as a base rate loan or a LIBOR rate loan, subject to certain conversion conditions. In addition, Key Bank also agreed to extend, from time to time, as the Operating Partnership may request, upon an advance written notice, swing loans in the total amount not to exceed $5.0 million. Such loans, if and when extended, will also be evidenced by separate promissory note(s).

Due to the revolving nature of the facility, amounts prepaid under the facility may be borrowed again. The Key Bank Credit Agreement contemplates (i) mandatory prepayments by the Operating Partnership of any borrowings under the facility in excess of the total allowable commitment, among other events, and (ii) optional prepayments, without any penalty or premium, in whole or in part, subject to payments of any amounts due associated with the prepayment of LIBOR rate contracts.

The Operating Partnership’s obligations under the facility are secured by a first priority lien and security interest to be held by the agents for Key Bank, in certain of the property, rights and interests of the Operating Partnership, the Guarantors (as defined below) and their subsidiaries now existing and as may be acquired (collectively, the “Collateral”). GTJ REIT, Inc., and each party to the Guaranty are collectively referred to as the “Guarantors.” The parties to the Key Bank Credit Agreement also entered into several side agreements, including, the Joinder Agreements, the Assignment of Interests, the Acknowledgments, the Mortgages, the Guaranty, and other agreements and instruments to facilitate the transactions contemplated under the Key Bank Credit Agreement. Such agreements contain terms and provisions that are customary for instruments of this nature.

The Operating Partnership’s continuing ability to borrow under the facility will be subject to its ongoing compliance with various affirmative and negative covenants, including, among others, with respect to liquidity, minimum occupancy, total indebtedness and minimum net worth. The Credit Agreement contains events of default and remedies customary for loan transactions of this sort including, among others, those related to a default in the payment of principal or interest, a material inaccuracy of a representation or warranty, and a default with regard to performance of certain covenants. The Credit Agreement also includes customary events of default (in certain cases subject to customary cure), in the event of which, amounts outstanding under the facility may be accelerated. The Credit Agreement includes customary representations and warranties of the Operating Partnership which must continue to be true and correct in all material respects as a condition to future draws.

16

On July 27, 2017, the Operating Partnership increased its line of credit facility with Key Bank from $50.0 million to $88.0 million. The $38.0 million increase could only be used for the acquisition of certain properties specified in the second amendment to the Key Bank Credit Agreement (including earnest money deposits) and the payment of customary closing costs.  In addition, the maturity date under the Key Bank Credit Agreement was extended from December 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018, with an additional extension option to June 30, 2019, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.

On December 20, 2017, the Operating Partnership refinanced certain properties acquired with its secured line of credit facility with Key Bank. As of result, the secured line of credit facility with Key Bank was reduced to $50.5 million, with the excess over $50.0 million only available for the purchase of a specified property.

On February 27, 2018, the Operating Partnership increased its secured line of credit facility with Key Bank from $50.5 million to $55.0 million. In addition, the Operating Partnership exercised its option to extend the maturity date of the secured revolving line of credit facility with Key Bank to June 30, 2019.

On July 31, 2018, the Operating Partnership reduced its line of credit facility with Key Bank from $55.0 million to $50.0 million. In addition, the maturity date of the secured revolving credit facility with Key Bank was extended from June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2020 and the applicable margin for LIBOR rate loans and base rate loans applicable to the secured revolving credit facility with Key Bank was reduced by 50 basis points (bps). The base rate loans will bear a base rate of interest calculated as the greater of: (a) the fluctuating annual rate of interest announced from time to time by Key Bank as its “prime rate,” (b) 50 bps above the rate announced by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (or Federal Funds Effective Rate), or (c) LIBOR plus 100 bps. The LIBOR rate loans will bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 250 to 300 bps, depending upon the overall leverage of the properties.

The contemplated uses of proceeds under the Key Bank Credit Agreement include, among others, repayment of indebtedness, funding of acquisitions, development and capital improvements, as well as working capital expenditures. Outstanding borrowings under the secured revolving credit facility with Key Bank as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were $40.0 million for both periods which are considered LIBOR rate loans.

In connection with the Key Bank Credit Agreement, the Operating Partnership is required to comply with certain covenants. As of June 30, 2019, the Operating Partnership was in compliance with all covenants.

5. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

Common Stock:

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $.0001 par value per share. As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, the Company had a total of 13,537,856 and 13,569,664 shares issued and outstanding, respectively.

Preferred Stock:

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share. Voting and other rights and preferences may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company. The Company has designated 500,000 shares of preferred stock as Series A preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share.  In addition, the Company has designated 6,500,000 shares of preferred stock as Series B preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share. There are no voting rights associated with the Series B preferred stock. There was no Series A preferred stock or Series B preferred stock outstanding as of June 30, 2019, or December 31, 2018.

Dividend Distributions:

The following table presents dividends declared by the Company on its common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2019:

17

The cash flows from operations was sufficient to pay the dividends declared and paid to date in 2019.

Purchase of Securities:

Share Redemption Program

On November 8, 2016, the Board approved a share redemption program (the “Program”) authorizing redemption of the Company’s shares of common stock (the “Shares”), subject to certain conditions and limitations. The following is a summary of terms and provisions of the Program:

Pursuant to the Program, on December 5, 2017, the Company redeemed 79,681 Shares at a redemption price of $12.55 per Share, for aggregate consideration of $999,996.55.  

Pursuant to the Program, on June 5, 2018, the Company redeemed 77,399 Shares at a redemption price of $12.92 per Share, for aggregate consideration of $999,995.08.  

Pursuant to the Program, on June 5, 2019, the Company redeemed 73,637 Shares at a redemption price of $13.58 per Share, for aggregate consideration of $999,990.46.  

     The Company received redemption requests during each of 2017, 2018 and 2019 exceeding the Program’s $1 million per year limit.  As a result, the Company was unable to purchase all Shares presented for redemption.  The Company honored the requests it received on a pro rata basis in accordance with the policy on priority of redemptions set forth in the Program, subject to giving certain priorities in accordance with the Program.  The Company treats any unsatisfied portions of redemption requests as requests for redemption in the next semi-annual period.

Redemptions under the Program are limited to an aggregate of $1 million during any calendar year. Because this limit was met for the 2019 calendar year when the Company redeemed shares on June 5, 2019, the Company will not redeem any shares for the current semi-annual period running from June 1, 2019 to November 30, 2019. The Company will resume redemptions under the Program for the semi-annual period running from December 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020. Any unsatisfied portions of redemption requests received during the most recently completed semi-annual period and any redemption requests received during the current semi-annual period will be treated as requests for redemption for the semi-annual period running from December 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020, unless such requests are withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the Program.

18

On March 19, 2019, the Company received its annual valuation as of December 31, 2018.  The annual valuation resulted in an adjustment to the redemption price under the Program from $12.92 to $13.58 per share. The Company has filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on March 22, 2019, and mailed to its stockholders an announcement of the redemption price adjustment. The redemption price of $13.58 per share will be effective until such time as the Board determines a new estimated per share Net Asset Value (“NAV”). Our stockholders are permitted to withdraw any redemption requests upon written notice to us at any time prior to ten (10) days before the end of the applicable semi-annual period.

Tender Offers:

On January 22, 2018, MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. and MacKenzie NY Real Estate 2 Corp. commenced a tender offer to purchase up to 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, for cash at a purchase price equal to $6.50 per share. The offer and withdrawal rights expired at 11:59 p.m., Pacific Time, on March 2, 2018. No shares were tendered pursuant to the tender offer.

On January 26, 2018, the Company commenced a self-tender offer to purchase up to 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, for cash at a purchase price equal to $7.00 per share. The offer and withdrawal rights expired at 12:00 midnight, New York City Time, on March 5, 2018. The Program was temporarily suspended during this offer as required by SEC rules. No repurchases of shares were made under the Program during the offer and for ten (10) business days thereafter. Pursuant to the self-tender offer, 5,000 shares were tendered and the Company purchased these shares for $35,000 on March 8, 2018. The suspension of the Program was terminated on March 20, 2018 and thereafter the Company recommenced purchases under the Program.

On February 15, 2019, MacKenzie Badger Acquisition Co. 4, LLC, MPF DeWaay Premier Fund 3, LLC, MPF Northstar Fund, LP, MPF Northstar Fund 2, LP and Mackenzie Capital Management, LP commenced a tender offer to purchase up to 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, for cash at a purchase price equal to $7.00 per share. The offer and withdrawal rights expired at 11:59 p.m., Pacific Time, on March 22, 2019. No shares were tendered pursuant to the tender offer.

On February 15, 2019, the Company commenced a self-tender offer to purchase up to 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, for cash at a purchase price equal to $8.50 per share. The offer and withdrawal rights expired at 12:00 midnight, New York City Time, on April 5, 2019. The Program was temporarily suspended during this offer as required by SEC rules. No repurchases were made under the Program during the offer and for ten (10) business days thereafter. Pursuant to the self-tender offer, 37,910 shares were tendered and the Company purchased these shares for $322,235 on April 9, 2019. The suspension of the Program was terminated on April 22, 2019, and thereafter the Company recommenced purchases under the Program.

Stock Based Compensation:

The Company had a 2007 Incentive Award Plan (the “2007 Plan”) that had the intended purpose of furthering the growth, development, and financial success of the Company and obtaining and retaining the services of those individuals considered essential to the long-term success of the Company. The 2007 Plan provided for awards in the form of restricted shares, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and stock appreciation rights. The aggregate number of shares of common stock which may have been awarded under the 2007 Plan was 1,000,000 shares. The 2007 Plan expired by its terms on June 11, 2017.

The 2017 Incentive Award Plan (the “2017 Plan”) was adopted by the Board and effective on April 24, 2017, subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders, which was obtained on June 8, 2017.  The 2017 Plan has the intended purpose of furthering the growth, development, and financial success of the Company and obtaining and retaining the services of those individuals considered essential to the long-term success of the Company. The 2017 Plan provides for awards in the form of stock, stock units, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and stock appreciation rights. The aggregate number of shares of common stock which may be awarded under the 2017 Plan is 2,000,000 shares. As of June 30, 2019, the Company had 1,862,323 shares available for future issuance under the 2017 Plan. Dividends paid on restricted shares are recorded as dividends on shares of the Company’s common stock whether or not they are vested. In accordance with ASC 718-10-35, the Company measures the compensation costs for these shares as of the date of the grant and the expense is recognized in earnings, at the grant date (for the portion that vest immediately) and then ratably over the respective vesting periods.  

On February 7, 2008, 55,000 options were granted to non-employee directors which vested immediately and 200,000 options were granted to key officers of the Company which had a three-year vesting period. On June 9, 2011, the Company granted 10,000 options to a non-employee director which vested immediately. In 2017, the 200,000 options granted to key officers of the Company were exercised. The 55,000 options granted to non-employee directors expired in 2018.

19

On November 8, 2016, 200,000 non-qualified stock options were granted to key officers of the Company and had a three-year vesting period. For this grant, the exercise price was $10.40 per share and was equal to the value per share based upon a valuation of the shares conducted by an independent third party for the purpose of valuing shares of the Company’s common stock.  The fair value of these stock options was based upon the Black-Scholes option pricing model, calculated at the grant date.

All options expire ten years from the date of grant. For both the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the stock compensation expense relating to these stock options was approximately $55,000.

The following table presents shares issued by the Company under the 2007 Plan and the 2017 Plan:

The Board of Directors has determined the value of a share of common stock to be $11.60 based on a valuation completed on March 20, 2019, with the assistance of an independent third-party for the purpose of valuing shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the 2017 Plan.  This value is not necessarily indicative of the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s total stock compensation expense was approximately $524,000 and $513,000, respectively. As of June 30, 2019, there was approximately $1,001,000 of unamortized stock compensation related to restricted stock. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.

As of June 30, 2019, there were 210,000 stock options that are outstanding, 143,332 of which are exercisable, and 580,464 shares of restricted stock are outstanding, of which 493,655 are vested.

20

The following is a summary of restricted stock activity:

The following is an amortization schedule of the total unamortized shares of restricted stock outstanding as of June 30, 2019:

6. EARNINGS PER SHARE:

In accordance with ASC Topic 260 “Earnings Per Share,” basic earnings per common share (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing the net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share (“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents and convertible securities then outstanding. There are 21,087 and 21,897 common share equivalents in the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, presented in diluted earnings per share.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands, except share and per share data):

21

7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

Paul Cooper, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Louis Sheinker, the President, Secretary and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, each hold passive, minority interests in a real estate brokerage firm, The Rochlin Organization. The firm acted as the exclusive broker for one of the Company’s properties.  In 2013, the firm introduced a new tenant to the property, resulting in the execution of a lease agreement and subsequent lease modification. The firm earned aggregate brokerage cash commissions of approximately $60,000 based on a total lease value of $1,015,000.  In January 2014, the new tenant expanded further which resulted in approximately $95,000 of brokerage commissions on the additional lease modification value of $2,100,000. In November 2015, the tenant concluded negotiations to expand by an additional 35,000 square feet which resulted in approximately $12,000 of brokerage commissions on the additional lease modification value of $200,000. In December 2016, the tenant concluded negotiations to expand by an additional 35,000 square feet which resulted in approximately $10,000 of brokerage commissions on the additional lease modification value of $332,000. In March 2018, the tenant exercised its option to renew its lease for the premises resulting in approximately $107,000 of brokerage commissions on the additional lease modification value of $3,600,000.  In November 2018, the tenant concluded negotiations to expand by an additional 30,000 square feet which resulted in approximately $40,000 of brokerage commissions on the additional lease modification value of $670,000.

The Company’s executive and administrative offices, located at 60 Hempstead Avenue, West Hempstead, NY, are leased from Lighthouse Sixty, L.P., a partnership of which Paul Cooper and Louis Sheinker are managing members of the general partner. This lease agreement expires in 2020 and has a current annual base rent of $279,000 with aggregate lease payments totaling $1.8 million.

On November 4, 2014, the Company invested $1.8 million for a limited partnership interest in Garden 1101 Stewart, L.P. (“Garden 1101”). Garden 1101 was formed for the purpose of acquiring a 90,000 square foot office building in Garden City, NY that was subsequently converted to a medical office building. The general partners of Garden 1101 include the members of Green Holland Ventures, Paul Cooper and Louis Sheinker. On February 9, 2018, the property acquired by Garden 1101 was sold and the Company received a distribution from the partnership of $3.7 million which resulted in a realized gain from unconsolidated affiliate of $2.5 million.

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

Legal Matters:

The Company is involved in lawsuits and other disputes which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, management believes that these matters will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Divestiture:

The Company has a pension withdrawal liability relating to a previous divestiture. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the remaining liability was approximately $1.0 and $1.1 million, respectively, and is included in other liabilities on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The liability is payable in monthly installments of approximately $8,100, including interest, over a twenty-year term ending in 2032.

Environmental Matters:  

As of June 30, 2019, three of the Company’s six former bus depot sites have received final regulatory closure, satisfying outstanding clean-up obligations related to legacy site contamination issues. Three sites continue with on-going cleanup, monitoring and reporting activities. We believe each of the six sites remain in compliance with existing local, state and federal obligations.

9. FAIR VALUE:

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

The fair value of the Company’s financial instruments is determined based upon applicable accounting guidance. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, including measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active (Level 2), and significant valuation assumptions that are not readily observable in the market (Level 3).

22

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, dividends payable and secured revolving credit facility approximated their carrying value because of their short-term nature. The fair values of mortgage notes payable and pension withdrawal liability are based on borrowing rates available to the Company, which are Level 2 inputs. The following table summarizes the carrying values and the estimated fair values of the financial instruments (in thousands):