Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2023 June (Form 10-Q)

10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

 QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2023

 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 001-38800

Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

47-3458693

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

611 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 400

South San Francisco, CA 94080

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (650) 443-7400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share	HARP	The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:


Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☒
		Emerging growth company	☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The number of outstanding shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.0001, as of July 31, 2023 was 38,771,502.

HARPOON THERAPEUTICS, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED June 30, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page


Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements			3

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item
1.	Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited):		5
		a. Condensed Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022	5
		b. Condensed Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022	6
		c. Condensed Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022	7
		d. Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022	8
		e. Notes to Condensed Financial Statements	9
2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		26
3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		38
4.	Controls and Procedures		38

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


1.	Legal Proceedings	39
1A.	Risk Factors	39
2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	85
3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	85
4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	85
5.	Other Information	85
6.	Exhibits	86
	Signatures	87

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will” or “would,” or the negative of these words or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

•

the timing of the initiation, progress, safety profiles, expected results and any winddowns of our preclinical studies, clinical trials and our research and development programs, including the timing of delivery of data set to AbbVie, as affected by various factors, including patient enrollment, rate of dose escalation, adverse events, and available drug supply;

•

our ability to advance product candidates into, and successfully complete, preclinical studies and clinical trials;

•

our estimates regarding expenses, capital sufficiency and requirements and needs for additional financing and our ability to obtain additional capital;

•

the timing or likelihood of regulatory filings and approvals;

•

our ability to regain compliance with the listing requirements of, and remain listed on, Nasdaq;

•

the commercialization of our product candidates, if approved;

•

the pricing, coverage, and reimbursement of our product candidates, if approved;

•

the implementation of our business model, strategic plans for our business and product candidates;

•

the potential benefits of our recent corporate restructuring and cost reduction initiatives;

•

the scope of protection we are able to establish and maintain for intellectual property rights covering our technology platforms, including TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR and our product candidates, including the projected terms of patent protection;

•

our ability to enter into strategic arrangements and/or collaborations and the potential benefits of such arrangements;

•

our ability to retain the continued service of our key executives and to identify, hire and retain additional qualified professionals;

•

our estimates regarding the market opportunity for our product candidates;

•

our financial performance;

•

the effects on our operations of general political and economic conditions, including any health pandemic, current or anticipated military conflicts or other geopolitical events, economic slowdowns, recessions or market corrections, inflationary pressures, rising interest rates and tightening of credit markets; and

•

developments relating to our competitors and our industry, including competing therapies.

These forward-looking statements are based on our management’s current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about our business and the industry in which we operate, and management’s beliefs and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance or development. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in the "Risk Factor Summary" below, under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment, and new risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.

In addition, statements that “we believe” and similar statements reflect our beliefs and opinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based on information available to us as of the date of this report. While we believe that information provides a reasonable basis for these statements, that information may be limited or incomplete. Our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all relevant information.

You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance, or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this report to conform these statements to new information, actual results or changes in our expectations, except as required by law.

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the “company,” “Harpoon,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc.“TriTAC” is a registered trademark and “Harpoon Therapeutics,” “Harpoon,” the Harpoon logo and ProTriTAC are among the trademarks owned by Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc. This report also contains trademarks and trade names that are property of their respective owners.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

HARPOON THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Condensed Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data)


	June 30,			December 31,
	2023			2022
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	32,797		$	51,614
Short-term marketable securities		12,758			1,498
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		3,512			1,615
Total current assets		49,067			54,727
Property and equipment, net		3,672			7,237
Operating lease right-of-use asset		9,295			10,854
Other assets		1,165			911
Total assets	$	63,199		$	73,729
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	3,627		$	4,712
Accrued liabilities		14,384			14,361
Deferred revenue, current		4,448			30,937
Operating lease liabilities, current		2,875			2,423
Total current liabilities		25,334			52,433
Deferred revenue, noncurrent		—			2,314
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion		12,291			13,583
Embedded redemption liability		15,795			—
Series A mandatorily redeemable preferred stock		6,781			—
Total liabilities		60,201			68,330
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
Stockholders' equity
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022; 37,972,630 shares and 35,786,684 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively		4			4
Additional paid-in capital		365,790			357,921
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		5			(3	)
Accumulated deficit		(362,801	)		(352,523	)
Total stockholders' equity		2,998			5,399
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	63,199		$	73,729

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

HARPOON THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Condensed Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data)


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022			2023			2022
Revenue
Collaboration and license revenue	$	20,221		$	8,303		$	28,804		$	14,209
Total revenue		20,221			8,303			28,804			14,209
Operating expenses
Research and development		12,196			20,651			27,359			41,469
General and administrative		3,803			5,063			7,988			10,464
Impairment of long-lived assets		1,729			—			1,729			—
Total operating expenses		17,728			25,714			37,076			51,933
Income (loss) from operations		2,493			(17,411	)		(8,272	)		(37,724	)
Interest income, net		615			104			1,040			144
Interest expense		(1,560	)		—			(1,698	)		—
Other expense, net		(488	)		(44	)		(1,347	)		(92	)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders		1,061			(17,351	)		(10,277	)		(37,672	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities		5			32			8			(9	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	1,066		$	(17,319	)	$	(10,269	)	$	(37,681	)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share, basic	$	0.03		$	(0.53	)	$	(0.28	)	$	(1.14	)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share, diluted	$	0.03		$	(0.53	)	$	(0.28	)	$	(1.14	)
Weighted-average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, basic		37,671,883			33,036,873			37,321,992			32,958,711
Weighted-average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, diluted		37,972,990			33,036,873			37,321,992			32,958,711

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

HARPOON THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Condensed Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share data)


					Additional		Accumulated Other						Total
	Common Stock				Paid-In		Comprehensive			Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Income (Loss)			Deficit			Equity
Balances at December 31, 2022		35,786,684	$	4	$	357,921	$	(3	)	$	(352,523	)	$	5,399
Issuance of common stock under equity incentive plan		148,252		—		93		—			—			93
Issuance of common stock warrants in connection with the sale of Series A mandatorily redeemable preferred stock, net of issuance cost of $194		—		—		3,790		—			—			3,790
Issuance of common stock pursuant to ATM facility, net of issuance costs of $51		1,660,851		—		1,525		—			—			1,525
Stock-based compensation		—		—		1,133		—			—			1,133
Net loss		—		—		—		—			(11,338	)		(11,338	)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities		—		—		—		3			—			3
Balances at March 31, 2023		37,595,787		4		364,462		—			(363,861	)		604
Issuance of common stock pursuant to ATM facility, net of issuance costs of $10		376,843		—		263		—			—			263
Stock-based compensation		—		—		1,065		—			—			1,065
Net income		—		—		—		—			1,061			1,061
Unrealized gain on marketable securities		—		—		—		5			—			5
Balances at June 30, 2023		37,972,630	$	4	$	365,790	$	5		$	(362,801	)	$	2,998


					Additional		Accumulated Other						Total
	Common Stock				Paid-In		Comprehensive			Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Income (Loss)			Deficit			Equity
Balances at December 31, 2021		32,765,788	$	4	$	342,905	$	(47	)	$	(284,792	)	$	58,070
Issuance of common stock under equity incentive plans including exercise of stock options		309,905		—		830		—			—			830
Vesting of early exercisable stock options		1,728		—		3		—			—			3
Stock-based compensation		—		—		2,843		—			—			2,843
Vesting of Founder's shares				—		—		—			—			—
Repurchase of common stock		—		—		—		—			—			—
Net loss		—		—		—		—			(20,321	)		(20,321	)
Unrealized loss on marketable securities		—		—		—		(41	)		—			(41	)
Balances at March 31, 2022		33,077,421		4		346,581		(88	)		(305,113	)		41,384
Issuance of common stock under equity incentive plans including exercise of stock options		26,163		—		53		—			—			53
Vesting of early exercisable stock options		1,728		—		3		—			—			3
Stock-based compensation		—		—		2,521		—			—			2,521
Net loss		—		—		—		—			(17,351	)		(17,351	)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities		—		—		—		32						32
Balances at June 30, 2022		33,105,312	$	4		349,158	$	(56	)	$	(322,464	)	$	26,642

HARPOON THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

(in thousands)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(10,277	)	$	(37,672	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss attributable to common stockholders to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Stock-based compensation expense		2,198			5,364
Depreciation and amortization		1,032			1,152
Non-cash lease expense		641			329
Loss on sale and disposal of fixed assets		444			—
Impairment of long-lived assets		1,729			—
Change in fair value of embedded redemption liability		250			—
Issuance cost for Series A Preferred Stock		1,085			—
Accretion of redemption value discount		1,698			—
Net amortization of (discounts) and premiums on marketable securities		(36	)		446
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(1,898	)		(1,287	)
Other assets		132			(10	)
Accounts payable		(1,376	)		125
Accrued liabilities		(440	)		(290	)
Deferred revenue		(28,804	)		(14,209	)
Operating lease liabilities		(840	)		(789	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(34,462	)		(46,841	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment		—			(53	)
Purchases of marketable securities		(12,714	)		(11,509	)
Maturities of marketable securities		1,500			81,402
Proceeds from sale of equipment		1,279			—
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(9,935	)		69,840
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of Series A Preferred Stock, net of issuance cost		23,900			—
Payments of deferred issuance costs		(201	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance cost		1,788			—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with employee benefit plans		93			882
Net cash provided by financing activities		25,580			882
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash		(18,817	)		23,881
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period		52,287			45,360
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period	$	33,470		$	69,241
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing information
Accrued issuance cost in the Series A Preferred Stock liability	$	290		$	—
Deferred issuance costs included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	184		$	—
Purchases of property and equipment included in accrued liabilities and accounts payable	$	—		$	98
Reclassification of employee stock liability to equity upon vesting	$	—		$	6

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

HARPOON THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements

(unaudited)

1. Organization

Description of Business

Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) is a clinical-stage immunotherapy company developing a novel class of T cell engagers that harness the power of the body’s immune system to treat patients suffering from cancer and other diseases. T cell engagers are engineered proteins that direct a patient’s own T cells to kill target cells that express specific proteins, or antigens, carried by the target cells. Using a proprietary Tri-specific T cell Activating Construct (“TriTAC”), platform, the Company is developing a pipeline of novel T cell engagers, or TriTACs, initially focused on the treatment of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. The Company is also developing its ProTriTAC platform, which builds upon the core elements of the TriTAC platform by utilizing a prodrug approach designed to allow T cell engagers to address cancer targets that would otherwise be limited by on-target toxicities. The Company's third proprietary technology platform, extended release TriTAC-XR, is designed to mitigate cytokine release syndrome. The Company was incorporated in Delaware in March 2015 and is headquartered in South San Francisco, California.

Liquidity

Since inception, the Company has incurred significant losses and has negative cash flows from operations. As of June 30, 2023, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $362.8 million. Management expects to continue to incur additional substantial losses in the foreseeable future as a result of the Company’s research and development activities.

In March 2023, the Company sold and issued (i) 25,000 shares of the 8.000% Series A mandatorily redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”), and (ii) warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 7,485,762 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Warrants”). The shares of Series A Preferred Stock and accompanying Warrants were sold at a purchase price of $1,000 per share of Series A Preferred Stock. The total gross proceeds received from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants in the Private Placement were $25.0 million, which does not include any proceeds that may be received upon exercise of the Warrants. As of June 30, 2023, there were 7,485,762 warrants issued and outstanding, each exercisable for one share of common stock at price of $0.978885 per share and no warrants had been exercised.

On November 14, 2022, the Company announced a corporate restructuring designed to reduce operating expenses and align the Company's core activities with its focused clinical programs that are expected to drive long-term growth. This restructuring reflects the Company's ongoing plans to focus its resources on its clinical programs, including: HPN217, B-cell maturation antigen, ("BCMA"), HPN328, Delta-like canonical Notch ligand 3 or ("DLL3"), and future clinical programs such as HPN601, epithelial cell adhesion molecule ("EpCAM”). The restructuring was completed in June 2023. For the six months ended June 30, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company paid $1.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in employee termination benefits.

In June 2023, the Company reduced its corporate facilities footprint by subletting all of its Cove Lease (as defined below) research labs and associated office space.

As of June 30, 2023, the Company had cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities of $45.6 million, which is available to fund future operations. The Company believes as of June 30, 2023 that its cash, cash equivalents, and short-term marketable securities, combined with cost savings from its restructuring plan provides sufficient capital resources to continue its operations for at least 12 months from the issuance date of the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements.

The Company will need to raise additional capital to support its research and development activities. There can be no assurance that additional funds will be available to the Company on acceptable terms on a timely basis, if at all. The Company’s activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including failing to secure additional funding to continue to operationalize the Company’s current technology and to advance the development of its product candidates. If the Company is unsuccessful in its efforts to raise additional financing, the Company will likely be required to further reduce its operations.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of SEC Regulation S-X for interim financial information.

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited annual financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, as filed with the SEC on March 27, 2023 (the “2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K”). The Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022 was derived from the audited annual financial statements as of the period then ended. Certain information and footnote disclosures typically included in the Company's audited annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the results of the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature except for the impacts of adopting new accounting standards discussed below. The accompanying unaudited condensed financial results are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the full fiscal year or for any subsequent interim period.

Except where noted below, there were no material changes to the Company's significant accounting and financial reporting policies in the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements from those reflected in the 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For further information with regard to the Company’s Significant Accounting Policies, please refer to Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Company’s audited annual financial statements included in the 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Updates to Significant Accounting Policies

On January 1, 2023, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2018-19 and ASU 2019-04 (collectively, “2016-13”). There was no material impact to the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.

Available-for-Sale Securities

The Company is exposed to credit losses through its investments in available-for-sale securities ("AFS"). An investment is impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost basis. The Company reviews each impaired AFS security held in its portfolio to determine whether the decline in fair value below its amortized cost basis is the result of credit losses or other factors. An allowance for credit losses is to be recorded as a charge to net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders in an amount equal to the difference between the impaired security’s amortized cost basis and the amount expected to be collected over the lifetime of security, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than its amortized cost basis. Any remaining difference between its amortized cost basis and fair value is deemed not to be due to expected credit losses and is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

The Company’s impairment review considers several factors to determine if an expected credit loss is present including the discounted present value of expected cash flows of the security, the capacity to hold a security or sell a security before recovery of the decline in amortized cost, the credit rating of the security and forecasted and historical factors that affect the value of the security.

As of June 30, 2023, the Company did not identify indicators of a decline in credit quality for the AFS held. The Company's AFS held at December 31, 2022 matured during the six months ended June 30, 2023 at full face value and all proceeds were received.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of unaudited condensed financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the unaudited condensed financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions made in the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements include, but are not limited to, valuation of the Series A Preferred Stock, valuation of the derivative liabilities, allowance for credit losses, the fair value of stock options and warrants, the research period of the collaboration agreements with AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd. (“AbbVie”), operating lease asset and lease liabilities, income tax uncertainties and certain accruals.

Segment Reporting

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. To date, the Company has viewed its operations and manages its business as one segment operating primarily in the United States.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less from the purchase date to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist primarily of amounts invested in money market accounts and are stated at fair value. There are no significant unrealized gains or losses on the money market funds for the periods presented.

As of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company classified $0.7 million as restricted cash related to a letter of credit established for an operating lease entered into in August 2018 and as collateral related to a security deposit for an operating lease entered into in October 2021. The restricted cash is classified in “Other assets” in the unaudited condensed balance sheets. See Note 6 Commitments and Contingencies to our unaudited condensed financial statements included elsewhere in this report for more information.

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the unaudited condensed balance sheets.


	As of
	June 30, 2023		December 31, 2022
	(in thousands)
Balance Sheets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	32,797	$	51,614
Restricted cash (included in other assets)		673		673
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	33,470	$	52,287

Marketable Securities

The Company generally invests its excess cash in money market funds and investment grade short-term to intermediate-term fixed income securities. Such investments are included in cash and cash equivalents, short-term marketable securities or long-term marketable securities on the unaudited condensed balance sheets. Marketable securities with a maturity date greater than 90 days and less than one year at each unaudited condensed balance sheet date are classified as short-term. Marketable securities with a maturity date greater than one year at each unaudited condensed balance sheet date are classified as long-term. All of the Company’s marketable securities are considered available-for-sale and are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included as a component of stockholders’ equity. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity, which is included in interest income, net on the unaudited condensed statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Realized gains and losses, if any, on marketable securities are included in interest income, net on the unaudited condensed statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The cost of securities sold is determined using specific identification.

The Company periodically evaluates its available-for-sale marketable debt securities for impairment. When the fair value of a marketable debt security is below its amortized cost, the amortized cost is reduced to its fair value if it is more likely than not that the Company is required to sell the impaired security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, or the Company has the intention to sell the security. If neither of these conditions are met, the Company determines whether the impairment is due to credit losses by comparing the present value of the expected cash flows of the security with its amortized cost basis. The amount of impairment recognized is limited to the excess of the amortized cost over the fair value of the security. An allowance for credit losses for the excess of amortized cost over the expected cash flows is recorded in other income (expense), net on the unaudited condensed statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Impairment losses that are not credit-related are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company is subject to credit risk from its portfolio of cash equivalents and marketable securities. The Company invests in money market funds through a major U.S. bank and is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by the financial institution to the extent of amounts recorded on the unaudited condensed balance sheets. The Company invests in money market funds and investment grade short- to intermediate-term fixed income securities. Under its investment policy, the Company limits amounts invested in such securities by credit rating, maturity, industry group, investment type and issuer, except for securities issued by the U.S. government. The Company is not exposed to any significant concentrations of credit risk from these financial instruments. The goals of the Company’s investment policy, in order of priority, are as follows: preservation of principal, liquidity of investments, fiduciary control of cash and investments, prevention of inappropriate concentrations of investments, and obtaining the best yields. The Company minimizes the amount of credit exposure by investing cash that is not required for immediate operating needs in money market funds and marketable securities.

Leases

The Company evaluates arrangements at inception to determine if an arrangement is or contains a lease. Operating lease assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and operating lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date of the lease based upon the present value of lease payments over the lease term. When determining the lease term, the Company includes options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. The Company uses an incremental borrowing rate that the Company would expect to incur for a fully collateralized loan over a similar term under similar economic conditions to determine the present value of the lease payments.

The lease payments used to determine the Company’s operating lease assets may include lease incentives and stated rent increases and are recognized in the Company’s operating lease assets in the unaudited condensed balance sheets. Operating lease liabilities are accreted over the term of the lease using the incremental borrowing rate and the associated expense is recorded to operating expenses in the unaudited condensed statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company recognizes lease expenses on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Variable lease payments are recognized as the associated obligation is incurred.

Fair Value Measurement

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability, or an exit price, in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date, and established a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available, and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The Company measures fair value based on a three-level hierarchy of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions about current market conditions. The three-level hierarchy of inputs is as follows:

Level 1—Observable inputs such as unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date;

Level 2—Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level 1) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and

Level 3— Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

To the extent that the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The carrying amounts reflected in the accompanying unaudited condensed balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term marketable securities, prepaid expenses, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature.

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the assets’ estimated useful lives or the remaining term of the lease. Depreciation and amortization begin at the time the asset is placed in service. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Upon sale or retirement of assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the unaudited condensed balance sheet and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. There were no material gains or losses for the sales or retirement of assets for any of the periods presented.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets, including property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets or group of assets may not be fully recoverable. If indicators of impairment exist and the undiscounted future cash flows that the assets are expected to generate are less than the carrying amount of the assets, the Company reduces the carrying amount of the assets through an impairment charge to their estimated fair values based

on a discounted cash flow approach or, when available and appropriate, to comparable market values. For the three months ended June 30, 2023, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.9 million to right-of-use assets associated with the Cove Lease and $0.8 million to leasehold improvements related to the Cove Lease to reduce their carrying values to their fair values using a discounted cash flow approach.

Revenue Recognition

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“Topic 606”), the Company recognizes revenue when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that the Company determines are within the scope of Topic 606, the Company performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that it will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods and services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within each contract that falls under the scope of Topic 606, determines those that are performance obligations and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Company then recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied.

The Company enters into corporate collaborations under which it may obtain upfront license fees, research and development funding, and development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments and royalty payments. The Company’s performance obligations under these arrangements may include licenses of intellectual property, distribution rights, research and development services, delivery of manufactured product and/or participation on joint steering committees.

Licenses of intellectual property: If the license to the Company’s intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the other performance obligations identified in the arrangement, the Company recognizes revenue from upfront license fees allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the customer and the customer is able to use and benefit from the license. For licenses that are bundled with other promises, the Company utilizes judgement to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, the appropriate method of measuring proportional performance for purposes of recognizing revenue from non-refundable, up-front fees. The Company evaluates the measure of proportional performance each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition. The Company recognizes collaboration revenue by measuring the progress toward complete satisfaction of the performance obligation using an input measure. In order to recognize revenue over the research and development period, the Company measures actual costs incurred to date compared to the overall total expected costs to satisfy the performance obligation. Revenues are recognized as the program costs are incurred. The Company will re-evaluate the estimate of expected costs to satisfy the performance obligation each reporting period and make adjustments for any significant changes.

Milestone payments: At the inception of each arrangement that includes development, regulatory or commercial milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether the milestones are considered probable of being reached and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price. Topic 606 suggests two alternatives to use when estimating the amount of variable consideration: the expected value method and the most likely amount method. Under the expected value method, an entity considers the sum of probability-weighted amounts in a range of possible consideration amounts. Under the most likely amount method, an entity considers the single most likely amount in a range of possible consideration amounts. Whichever method is used, it should be consistently applied throughout the life of the contract; however, it is not necessary for the Company to use the same approach for all contracts. The Company expects to use the most likely amount method for development and regulatory milestone payments. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the Company’s or the licensee’s control, such as regulatory approvals, are not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received. The transaction price is then allocated to each performance obligation on a relative stand-alone selling price basis. The Company recognizes revenue as or when the performance obligations under the contract are satisfied. At the end of each subsequent reporting period, the Company re-evaluates the probability or achievement of each such milestone and any related constraint, and if necessary, adjusts its estimates of the overall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a cumulative catch-up basis, which would affect revenues and earnings in the period of adjustment.

Commercial milestones and royalties: For arrangements that include sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, and in which the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, the Company recognizes revenue when the related sales occur. To date, the Company has not recognized any royalty revenue resulting from its collaboration arrangements.

Upfront payments and fees are recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt or when due, and may require deferral of revenue recognition to a future period until the Company performs its obligations (i.e. research and development services) under these arrangements. Amounts due to the Company are recorded as accounts receivable when the Company’s right to consideration is unconditional. Amounts recognized as revenue prior to receipt are recorded as contract assets included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Company’s unaudited condensed balance sheet. If the Company expects to have an unconditional right to receive the consideration in the next twelve months, this will be classified in current assets.

Research and Development Expenses and Accrued Research and Development Costs

The Company expenses research and development costs as incurred. Research and development expenses consist of personnel costs for the Company’s research and product development employees. Also included are non-personnel costs such as professional fees payable to third parties for preclinical studies, clinical trials, research services, production of materials for clinical trials, laboratory supplies and equipment maintenance and depreciation, intellectual property licenses and other consulting costs.

The Company estimates preclinical and clinical study and research expenses based on the services performed, pursuant to contracts with research institutions that conduct and manage preclinical studies, clinical trials and research services and manufacturing organizations in connection with the production of materials for clinical trials on its behalf. The Company estimates these expenses based on discussions with internal management personnel and external service providers as to the progress or stage of completion of services and the contracted fees to be paid for such services. The Company records the estimated costs of research and development activities based upon the estimated amount services provided but not yet invoiced and includes these costs in development expenses. The Company accrues for these costs based on factors such as estimates of the work completed and in accordance with agreements established with its third-party service provides under the service agreements. The Company makes significant judgments and estimates in determining the accrued liabilities balance in each reporting period. As actual costs become known, the Company adjusts its accrued liabilities. The Company has not experienced any material differences between accrued costs and actual costs incurred. However, the status and timing of actual services performed may vary from the Company’s estimates, resulting in adjustments to expense in future periods. Changes in these estimates that result in material changes to the Company’s accruals could materially affect the Company’s results of operations. Payments associated with licensing agreements to acquire exclusive license to develop, use, manufacture and commercialize products that have not reached technological feasibility and do not have alternate future use are expensed as incurred.

Payments made to third parties under these arrangements in advance of the performance of the related services by the third parties are recorded as prepaid expenses until the services are rendered. Such payments are evaluated for current or long-term classification based on when such services are expected to be received.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company maintains a stock-based compensation plan as a long-term incentive for employees, consultants and members of the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”). The plan allows for the issuance of non-statutory options (“NSOs”) and incentive stock options to employees and NSOs to non-employees.

Share-based payments are measured using fair-value-based measurements and recognized as compensation expense over the service period in which the awards are expected to vest. The Company’s fair-value-based measurements of awards to employees, directors and consultants as of the grant date utilize the single-option award-valuation approach, and the Company uses the straight-line method for expense attribution. The fair-value-based measurements of options granted to non-employees are remeasured at each period end until the options vest and are amortized to expense as earned. The valuation model used for calculating the estimated fair value of stock awards is the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the Company to make assumptions and judgments about the variables used in the calculations, including the expected term (weighted-average period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding), the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock, the related risk-free interest rate and the expected dividend yield. The Company has elected to recognize forfeitures of share-based payment awards as they occur.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates applied to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized as income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Financial statement effects of uncertain tax positions are recognized when it is more-likely-than-not, based on the technical merits of the position, that it will be sustained upon examination. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are included as a component of Other expense, net. To date, there have been no interest or penalties charged in relation to the unrecognized tax benefits.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740-10, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The Company assesses all material positions taken in any income tax return, including all significant uncertain positions, in all tax years that are still subject to assessment or challenge by relevant taxing authorities. Assessing an uncertain tax position begins with the initial determination of the position’s sustainability and is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. As of each balance sheet date, unresolved uncertain tax positions must be reassessed, and the Company will determine whether (i) the factors underlying the sustainability assertion have changed and (ii) the amount of the recognized tax benefit is still appropriate. The recognition and measurement of tax benefits requires significant judgment. Judgment concerning the recognition and measurement of a tax benefit might change as new information becomes available.

The Company includes any penalties and interest expense related to income taxes as a component of the provision for income tax, as necessary. To date, there have been no interest or penalties charged in relation to the unrecognized tax benefits.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders

Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, without consideration of potentially dilutive securities. Diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, without consideration of potentially dilutive securities.

Diluted net income per share attributable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing the net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, with consideration of potentially dilutive securities. See Note 10 Net Income (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders for more information.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders and certain changes in stockholders’ equity that are excluded from net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders, primarily unrealized gains or losses on the Company’s marketable securities.

Emerging Growth Company Status

The Company is an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act until such time as those standards apply to private companies. The Company has elected to use this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until the earlier of the date that the Company (i) is no longer an emerging growth company or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opts out of the extended transition period provided in the JOBS Act. As a result, the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with the new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (ASU 2016-13), which requires that expected credit losses relating to financial assets measured on an amortized cost basis and available-for-sale debt securities be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. ASU 2016-13 limits the amount of credit losses to be recognized for available-for-sale debt securities to the amount by which carrying value exceeds fair value and requires the reversal of previously recognized credit losses if fair value increases. In April, May and November 2019, the FASB issued additional amendments to the new guidance related to transition and clarification. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates, which deferred the effective date of this standard for all entities except SEC filers that are not smaller reporting companies to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years.

The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 effective January 1, 2023 on a modified retrospective basis. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 did not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed financial statements.

3. Fair Value Measurement

The following table presents information about the Company’s financial assets that are measured at fair value and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation:


	June 30, 2023
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(in thousands)
Assets
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	28,334	$	28,334	$	—	$	—
U.S. government securities		3,983		3,983		—		—
Total cash equivalents		32,317		32,317	$	—	$	—
Short-term marketable securities:
U.S. government securities	$	12,757		12,757		—		—
Total cash equivalents and marketable securities	$	45,074	$	45,074	$	—	$	—


Liabilities
Embedded redemption liability		15,795	$	—	$	—	$	15,795
Total liabilities	$	15,795	$	—	$	—	$	15,795

The Company's Level 3 embedded redemption liability was valued utilizing a probability-weighted cash flow approach, including variables for the timing of the related events and other probability estimates, which are deemed to be Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. The embedded redemption liability fair value charge was $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023.


	December 31, 2022
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(in thousands)
Assets
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	45,963	$	45,963	$	—	$	—
Short-term marketable securities:
U.S. government securities		1,498		—		1,498		—
Total cash equivalents and marketable securities	$	47,461	$	45,963	$	1,498	$	—

The Company’s Level 2 securities are valued using third-party pricing sources. The pricing services utilize industry standard valuation models, including both income and market-based approaches, for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2022.

4. Available-for-Sale Securities

At June 30, 2023, the Company held money market funds and U.S. Treasuries as cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities. All marketable securities were considered available-for-sale at June 30, 2023. As of June 30, 2023, no indicators of a decline in credit quality was noted for the money market funds, U.S. Treasuries and short-term marketable securities. The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains or losses, and fair value of the Company’s marketable securities by major security type at each unaudited condensed balance sheets date are summarized in the tables below:


	June 30, 2023
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gain		Gross Unrealized Loss		Allowance for Credit Losses		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Cash equivalents
Money market funds	$	28,334	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	28,334
U.S. government securities		3,982		1		—		—		3,983
Total cash equivalents		32,316		1		—		—		32,317
Short-term marketable securities:
U.S. government securities		12,752		5		—		—		12,757
Total short-term marketable securities		12,752		5		—		—		12,757
Total	$	45,068	$	6	$	—	$	—	$	45,074


	December 31, 2022
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gain		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Cash equivalents
Money market funds	$	45,963	$	—	$	—		$	45,963
Total cash equivalents		45,963		—		—			45,963
Short-term marketable securities:
U.S. government securities		1,501		—		(3	)		1,498
Total short-term marketable securities		1,501		—		(3	)		1,498
Total	$	47,464	$	—	$	(3	)	$	47,461

As of December 31, 2022, unrealized losses on investments were not material and were not the result of a decline in credit quality. Unrealized losses are generally due to interest rate fluctuations, as opposed to declines in credit quality. All investments held at December 31, 2022 matured at par value.

Accrued interest receivable was $0.2 million as of June 30, 2023 and was recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets. As of June 30, 2023, all short-term marketable securities held mature within one year.

5. Balance Sheet Components

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment, net consists of the following:


	June 30,			December 31,
	2023			2022
	(in thousands)
Leasehold improvements	$	3,625		$	8,872
Computer equipment and software		91			91
Furniture and fixtures		47			585
Laboratory equipment		—			6,232
		3,763			15,780
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(91	)		(8,543	)
Total property and equipment, net	$	3,672		$	7,237

Depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment amounted to $0.4 million and $1.0 million and $0.6 million and $1.2 million for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022, respectively. Loss on sale and disposal of fixed assets was $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023.

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2023		2022
	(in thousands)
Accrued research and development	$	10,336	$	8,569
Accrued personnel costs		3,167		4,760
Accrued professional and consulting fees		788		896
Other		93		136
Total accrued liabilities	$	14,384	$	14,361

6. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

In August 2018, the Company entered into a lease agreement for the office and laboratory space in South San Francisco, California (the “Cove Lease”). The lease commencement date was July 1, 2019, at which time the Company took occupancy. The Cove Lease includes an option to renew, exercisable at the Company’s sole discretion, with a renewal term for an additional period of eight years. Therefore, the operating lease right-of-use asset and lease liabilities on the unaudited condensed balance sheets only contemplate the initial lease term. The Cove Lease qualifies as an operating lease. In June 2023, the Company entered into a lease assignment agreement to sublease the Cove Lease office and laboratory space, vacated the space and moved into the Gateway Lease (as defined below) office space. The Company did not receive sublease income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023. As of June 30, 2023, the Company's total minimum rentals to be received in the future under noncancelable subleases are $9.4 million. See Note 8 Restructuring and Impairment for more information.

In October 2021, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space in South San Francisco, California (the “Gateway Lease”). The Gateway Lease commencement date was December 19, 2022, at which time the Company obtained control, gained physical access and was able to occupy. The Gateway Lease does not contain a renewal option. Therefore, the right-of-use asset and lease liabilities on the unaudited condensed balance sheets only contemplate the initial lease term through March 31, 2028. The Gateway Lease qualifies as an operating lease.

The following table summarizes the presentation in the Company’s unaudited condensed balance sheets of its operating lease (in thousands):


	As of June 30, 2023
Assets:
Operating lease right-of-use assets	$	9,295
Liabilities
Operating lease liabilities	$	2,875
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion		12,291
Total operating lease liabilities	$	15,166

The Company incurred $0.2 million in variable lease costs for each of the three months ended June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022. The Company incurred $0.3 million in variable lease costs for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022.

Future minimum lease payments as of June 30, 2023 are as follows (in thousands):


	Operating Lease Commitments
Remainder of 2023	$	2,072
2024		4,223
2025		4,348
2026		4,477
2027		2,775
2028 and thereafter		381
Total future minimum lease payments		18,276
Less imputed interest		(3,110	)
Total	$	15,166

As of June 30, 2023, the weighted average remaining lease term was 4.3 years and the weighted average incremental borrowing rate used to determine the operating lease liability was 9.32%.

7. Collaboration, License & Clinical Supply Agreements

Development and Option with AbbVie

On November 20, 2019, the Company entered into a Development and Option Agreement with AbbVie (as amended, the “Development and Option Agreement”) in connection with the Company’s HPN217 program, which targets BCMA. Pursuant to such agreement, the Company granted to AbbVie an option to a worldwide, exclusive license under the Company’s patents and know-how applicable to the HPN217 program to develop, manufacture, and commercialize products arising from the HPN217 program and targeting BCMA (the “HPN217 Products”). Under the Development and Option Agreement, the Company filed an Investigational New Drug Application for HPN217 and is responsible for conducting clinical development activities pursuant to a mutually agreed development plan, including conducting a Phase 1/2 clinical trial of HPN217, in order for AbbVie to determine whether it wishes to exercise its option to take a worldwide, exclusive license to such HPN217 program.

Under the Development and Option Agreement, AbbVie may exercise its license option at any time during a period commencing on the effective date of the agreement and expiring after a specified period following delivery by the Company of a specified data package arising from the first Phase 1/2 trial for the HPN217 Products. Following AbbVie’s exercise of its option, and except for completion of certain development activities by the Company under the development plan, AbbVie will be solely responsible, at its cost, for the development, manufacture and commercialization of HPN217 and any other HPN217 Products. AbbVie is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and obtain regulatory approval for one HPN217 Product, for at least one indication, for use in each of the United States and specified European markets.

Upon execution of the Development and Option Agreement, the Company received an upfront payment of $30.0 million. Additionally, in June 2020, the Company received a development milestone payment of $50.0 million as a result of initiating its Phase 1/2 clinical trial by dosing the first patient in the trial in April 2020.

If AbbVie exercises its option to a worldwide, exclusive license, AbbVie will pay the Company an option exercise fee of $200.0 million. Following option exercise, AbbVie will be required to make further payments to the Company of up to $230.0 million in the aggregate for the achievement of specified development, regulatory and commercial sales milestones for HPN217 Products. The Company will also receive tiered royalties on net sales by AbbVie, its affiliates and sublicensees of HPN217 Products at percentages ranging from the high single digits to the very low double digits, subject to specified offsets and reductions. Royalties will be payable under the Development and Option Agreement on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis commencing on the date of first commercial sale of HPN217 and other HPN217 Products and ending on the later of expiration of all valid claims of specified licensed patents in such country, expiration of regulatory exclusivity in such country, or ten years following first commercial sale of such HPN217 Product in such country.

The Development and Option Agreement will terminate upon the date of the expiration of all AbbVie’s royalty payment obligations in all countries, or upon expiration of the license option period and the failure of AbbVie to exercise its license option. The Development and Option Agreement may be terminated by either party immediately for the insolvency of the other party or on 90 days’ written notice for an uncured material breach of the Development and Option Agreement by the other party. AbbVie may also terminate the Development and Option Agreement in its entirety or on a country-by-country basis for any reason on 90 days’ written notice to the Company.

The Company assessed the Development and Option Agreement in accordance with Topic 606 and concluded that AbbVie is a customer under this agreement. The Company identified the following performance obligation at the inception of the Development and Option Agreement consisting of the initial development activities.

The Company evaluated AbbVie’s option to obtain a worldwide exclusive license for HPN217 to determine whether it provides AbbVie with any material rights. The Company concluded that the option was not issued at a significant and incremental discount, and therefore do not provide material rights. As such, the option is excluded as a performance obligation at the outset of the agreement.

At the inception of the agreement, the transaction price included the $30.0 million up-front consideration received in December 2019 and a development milestone of up to $50.0 million to be received upon dosing of the first patient in the HPN217 Phase 1/2 clinical trial within a specified time period, for a total transaction price of $80.0 million. In April 2020, the Company had achieved this development milestone as a result of dosing its first patient in the Phase 1/2 clinical trial of HPN217 and received $50.0 million in June 2020. The remaining development, commercialization, and sales milestones along with sales-based royalties were not included in the transaction price, as these milestone amounts were fully constrained on the probability of achievement. The Company will reevaluate the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur, and, if necessary, adjust its estimate of the transaction price.

The transaction price of $80.0 million relates to a single unit of accounting. The initial development activities are considered a single unit of accounting. The Company recognizes revenue associated with the performance obligation as the initial development activities are performed using an input method, according to the costs incurred as related to the estimated costs for the development and regulatory activities to be performed through the delivery of the HPN217 Opt-in report. The transfer of control occurs over this time period and, in management’s judgment, is the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligation. Such estimates are reviewed by the Company on a periodic basis and, if necessary, the Company will adjust the measure of performance and related revenue recognition. In June 2023, the Company announced it had completed planned patient enrollment in the Phase 1 clinical trial and had agreed with AbbVie on the patient follow up time required to collect and compile the Opt-in report data. As a result, the prior estimate of delivering the Opt-in report was accelerated and the Company noted a change in the measurement of performance obligation based on remaining efforts around collecting and analyzing the data from the Phase 1 clinical trial and delivering the Opt-in report to AbbVie in order for AbbVie to make a decision on whether it will exercise its option to a worldwide, exclusive license. In the three months ended June 30, 2023, the Company realized additional deferred revenue of $4.2 million from the change in estimate.

The Company recognized $10.4 million and $8.3 million of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The Company recognized $17.2 million and $14.2 million of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As of June 30, 2023, the Company's balance of deferred revenue was $4.5 million, all of which was classified as short-term deferred revenue, in the accompanying unaudited condensed balance sheets.

As of June 30, 2023, the Company will recognize royalty revenue in the period of sale of the related products, if any, based on the underlying contract terms. No such amounts were recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.

Amended and Restated Discovery Collaboration Agreement with AbbVie

On August 16, 2021, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Discovery Collaboration and License Agreement with AbbVie, or the First Amendment, which amends the Amended and Restated Discovery Collaboration and License Agreement entered on November 20, 2019, between the Company and AbbVie (such agreement, as amended by the First Amendment, the "Restated Collaboration Agreement"). The Restated Collaboration Agreement amends and restates the Discovery Collaboration and License Agreement entered into between the Company and AbbVie, dated October 20, 2017 and amended April 3, 2019, or the Original Collaboration Agreement. Pursuant to the First Amendment, the Company and AbbVie agreed to include the ProTriTAC technology within the Restated Collaboration Agreement. Pursuant to the Original Collaboration Agreement, the Company granted to AbbVie worldwide exclusive rights to develop and commercialize products that incorporate the Company’s proprietary TriTAC technology together with soluble T cell receptors, or TCRs provided by AbbVie that bind to targets accepted by the parties. Under the terms of the Original Collaboration Agreement, AbbVie was granted the right to designate up to two targets for development of TriTAC constructs, which it selected in 2017 and 2019, respectively. Pursuant to the Restated Collaboration Agreement, AbbVie is permitted to designate two further targets, with an option to select up to four additional targets, selected during a specified period following the effective date, to be the subject of activities under the collaboration, and is granted a worldwide, exclusive license to develop and commercialize products that incorporate either the Company’s proprietary TriTAC platform technology, or (as a result of and pursuant to the First Amendment) its ProTriTAC platform technology, to pursue available TCRs and/or antibody targets. Such products may incorporate antibodies provided by AbbVie or by the Company. During a period of up to four years following the date of AbbVie’s designation of each target for the products, and subject to confirmation of target availability, the Company and AbbVie will conduct certain research and discovery activities under a mutually agreed discovery and research plan

in connection with the creation and evaluation of constructs comprising the Company’s proprietary TriTAC or ProTriTAC technologies, as applicable, in conjunction with the soluble TCR or antibody sequences directed at the agreed upon targets of interest. The Company may not, including through any third party, develop or commercialize any competing product that binds to any of the included targets. As was the case under the Original Collaboration Agreement, following the discovery phase, AbbVie will be solely responsible, at its cost, for the development, manufacture and commercialization of the products that arise from the activities under the discovery plan. AbbVie is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize one such product directed to each target for which the discovery activities were completed in each Major Market (as defined in the Restated Collaboration Agreement).

In addition to the upfront payment of $17.0 million already paid under the Original Collaboration Agreement, the Company received an upfront payment of $20.0 million under the Restated Collaboration Agreement for AbbVie’s right to select two additional targets and an option to select up to four further targets. AbbVie will be required to make payments to the Company, upon target selection, of $10.0 million for each target, for up to four additional targets selected by AbbVie. For each of the up to eight targets selected, the Company is eligible to receive up to $300.0 million in the aggregate for the achievement of specified development, regulatory and commercial sales milestones for licensed products indicated for human therapeutic or prophylactic use. The Company will also be eligible to receive tiered royalties on net sales by AbbVie, its affiliates and sublicensees of licensed products at percentages in the mid-single digits, subject to specified offsets and reductions. Royalties will be payable under the First Amendment and Restated Collaboration Agreement on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis commencing on the date of first commercial sale of each product and ending on the later of expiration of all valid claims of specified licensed patents in such country, expiration of regulatory exclusivity in such country or ten years following first commercial sale of such product in such country. If licensed products are developed and commercialized for diagnostic or veterinary use, or certain screening or monitoring uses, the parties have agreed to negotiate an appropriate reduction in the economic terms applicable to such non-therapeutic and prophylactic applications.

The Restated Collaboration Agreement will terminate upon the date of the expiration of all AbbVie’s royalty payment obligations in all countries. The Restated Collaboration Agreement may be terminated by either party immediately for the insolvency of the other party or on 90 days’ written notice for an uncured material breach of such agreement by the other party. AbbVie may also terminate the Restated Collaboration Agreement in its entirety or on a target-by-target or country-by-country basis for any reason on 30 days’ written notice to the Company. In addition, AbbVie may terminate the Restated Collaboration Agreement immediately in its entirety or on a target-by-target basis if AbbVie considers in good faith that there has been a failure of the discovery or development efforts with respect to such target, or that further development or commercialization of products directed to such target is not advisable as a result of a serious safety issue.

The Company assessed the Original Collaboration Agreement and Restated Collaboration Agreement including the First Amendment in accordance with Topic 606 and concluded that AbbVie is a customer under all agreements. The Company concluded that there are multiple promises under the Original Collaboration Agreement and Restated Collaboration Agreement including the First Amendment which include (1) research and development activities; (2) regulatory documentation and know-how; and (3) the license to the related technology. The Company combined these promises into a single performance obligation, as the Company is obliged to render specialized services for the research program, and other promises have either no significant value or are not distinct.

At the inception of the Original Collaboration Agreement, the Company determined that the transaction price was $17.0 million, which was all allocated to the two initial targets. The Company recognized the full $17.0 million upfront payment related to the initial two targets prior to 2022.

At the inception of the Restated Collaboration Agreement, the Company determined that the transaction price included the $20.0 million upfront payment received in December 2019. The Company allocates $10.0 million to each additional target selected. The company estimates that the $20.0 million upfront payment under the Restated Collaboration Agreement will be recognized over a period in which ongoing research and development activities are incurred based on the projected activities to be performed over each reporting period relative to the total estimated performance period. Such estimates are reviewed by the Company on a periodic basis and, if necessary, the Company will adjust the measure of performance and related revenue recognition. As of June 30, 2023, the Company determined that a transaction price of $20.0 million was still appropriate and that the Company had completed the performance obligation for the two additional targets. As such, the entire $20.0 million was recognized. The Company recognized $9.9 million and zero million in revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022, respectively. The Company recognized $11.6 million and zero revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022, respectively.

The Company determined that future contingent payments that may be received related to development and regulatory milestones under the Restated Collaboration Agreement are based on the performance of AbbVie and are constrained due to the fact that it was not probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue would not occur, as their achievement is highly dependent on the successful completion of the research activities. Accordingly, revenue for the achievement of these milestones will be recognized

in the period that it is deemed probable that the milestone will be achieved. Any consideration related to commercialization and sales milestones, and sales-based royalties will be recognized when the related sales occur as they were determined to relate predominantly to the license granted to AbbVie and have been excluded from the transaction price. The Company will re-evaluate the transaction price in each reporting period as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur.

As of June 30, 2023, the Company had not recognized or earned any milestone payments under the Original Collaboration or Restated Collaboration Agreement including the First Amendment. The Company will recognize royalty revenue in the period of sale of the related products, based on the underlying contract terms. No such amounts were recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022. As of June 30, 2023, the Company had no deferred revenue balance under the Restated Collaboration Agreement.

Collaboration and License Revenue

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022, collaboration and license revenue in the accompanying unaudited condensed statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of the following:


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
Collaboration and License Revenue		2023	2022			2023		2022
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
AbbVie Restated Collaboration Agreement	$	9,870	$	—	$	11,599	$	—
AbbVie Development and Option Agreement		10,351		8,303		17,205		14,209
Total collaboration and license revenue	$	20,221	$	8,303	$	28,804	$	14,209

8. Restructuring and Impairment

In November 2022, the Company's Board approved a corporate restructuring. The restructuring resulted in a reduction in workforce designed to reduce operating expenses and focus the Company’s resources on its clinical programs. The restructuring was completed in June 2023. For the six months ended June 30, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company paid $1.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in employee termination benefits.

As part of the restructuring plan, the Company initiated activities to reduce its corporate facilities footprint. In June 2023, the Company sublet the Cove Lease research labs and associated offices and relocated to offices at the Gateway Lease. The Company performed an analysis of the resulting net sublease cash flows and carrying value of the Cove Lease right-of-use assets and the leasehold improvements assets. For the three months ended June 30, 2023, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.9 million to the Cove Lease right-of-use assets and $0.8 million to the Cove Lease leasehold improvements reducing their carrying values to their fair values based on a discounted cash flow approach. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market (i.e., a market participant discount rate) and, therefore, represents a Level 3 measurement.

For the three months ended June 30, 2023, the Company recorded a loss of $0.4 million on the sale and disposal of fixed assets.

9. Equity

Incentive Plans

Stock Option Activity

As of June 30, 2023, there were 2,989,829 shares reserved by the Company to grant under its 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”).

The following summarizes option activity under the Company’s 2019 Plan and 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”):


				Weighted		Weighted
	Number of			Average		Average		Aggregate
	Outstanding			Exercise		Remaining		Intrinsic
	Options			Price		Contractual Life		Value
						(in years)		(in thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2022		6,430,946		$	5.62		7.60	$	306
Options granted		2,263,379			0.80
Options exercised		—			—
Options cancelled		(1,261,121	)		7.22
Balance as of June 30, 2023		7,433,204		$	3.89		7.87	$	393
Exercisable as of June 30, 2023		3,227,748		$	6.40		6.11	$	126

The aggregate intrinsic values of options outstanding, vested and exercisable, and vested and expected to vest were calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the options and the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock.

During the six months ended June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022, the estimated weighted-average grant-date fair value of the stock options vested was $4.51 and $5.25 per share, respectively, and the estimated weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted was $1.44 and $3.18 per share, respectively.

The fair value of employee and director stock option awards was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022
Expected term (years)		5.89			6.02
Expected volatility		90.14	%		80.76	%
Risk-free interest rate		3.54	%		1.67	%
Expected dividend yield		0	%		0	%

Total stock-based compensation was as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022
	(in thousands)
Operating Expenses
Research and development	$	534	$	1,233
General and administrative		531		1,271
Total stock-based compensation	$	1,065	$	2,503

Stock-based compensation related to non-employee awards, which is included in the table above, was not material for both three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.

2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Board adopted, and the Company’s stockholders approved, the 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2019 ESPP”) in January 2019, which became effective upon the closing of the Company’s IPO in February 2019. The 2019 ESPP initially reserved 250,000 shares of common stock for employee purchases under terms and provisions established by the Board. The 2019 ESPP evergreen provision provides that the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the 2019 ESPP will automatically increase January 1st of, each year for a period of up to ten years, commencing on January 1, 2020 and ending on (and including) January 1, 2029, in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) 1% of the total number of shares of the Company's common stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year, (ii) 750,000 shares of the Company's common stock or (iii) such lesser number of shares of common stock as determined by the Board. In January 2023, common stock available for issuance under the 2019 ESPP was increased by approximately 358,000 shares as a result of this evergreen provision. The Company issued 148,252 shares under the 2019 ESPP during the three and six months ended June 30, 2023. The Company has approximately 927,000 shares reserved for future issuance as of June 30, 2023.

Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants

On March 22, 2023, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell and issue shares of the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants in a Private Placement transaction.

At the closing of the Private Placement on March 22, 2023 (the “Closing”), the Company sold and issued (i) 25,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and (ii) Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 7,485,762 shares of the Company’s common stock. The shares of Series A Preferred Stock and accompanying Warrants were sold at a purchase price of $1,000 per share of Series A Preferred Stock. The Warrants are exercisable immediately, will remain exercisable for a period of eight years following the date of issuance and have an exercise price of $0.978885 per share. As of June 30, 2023, there were 7,485,762 warrants, each exercisable for one share of common stock at price of $0.978885 per share, and no warrants had been exercised. The total gross proceeds to the Company from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants in the Private Placement were $25.0 million, which excludes $1.3 million in offering costs and any proceeds that may be received upon exercise of the Warrants.

The Series A Preferred Stock is non-voting stock. Some of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are considered related parties which the disinterested members of the Board reviewed and approved in accordance with the Company's related-person transaction policy. Holders of Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive dividends that accrue on a day-to-day basis until paid at a rate of 8.000% per year on the stated value of $1,000 per share of Series A Preferred Stock. Such dividends shall be payable when declared by the Board, or paid in connection with redemption or other relevant event regardless of whether a dividend has been declared by the Board. As of June 30, 2023 and through the issuance date of these accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements, the Board had not declared a dividend.

The Company may, at its option, redeem shares of Series A Preferred Stock from time to time at the Redemption Price Per Share, which is equal to the sum of (i) the product of (a) the Stated Value of $1,000 and (b) a Return Factor equal to 3.5 until the 18-month anniversary of the Closing and 4.5 thereafter and (ii) any accrued and unpaid dividends. In addition, the Series A Preferred Stock is mandatorily redeemable by the Company out of funds legally available therefor, at the Redemption Price Per Share, upon (i) receipt by the Company of certain amounts in connection with any HPN217 licensing transaction of which the maximum number of then-outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock that may be redeemed using up to 50% of the cash proceeds and fair market value of certain non-cash proceeds received by the Company, (ii) receipt by the Company of certain net proceeds in connection with certain strategic and licensing transactions and (iii) on the third anniversary of the Closing or Anniversary Based Redemption Date, unless extended by consent of the requisite holders. The Company is obligated to redeem all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock at the Redemption Price Per Share on the third anniversary of the Closing, as that date may be extended up to an additional two years by consent of the requisite holders or for any period of time by consent of all holders.

Series A Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock

As of the Closing, the Company evaluated the redemption feature, Warrant terms and cumulative preferred dividend rights related to sale of the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants. The Company determined that the Series A Preferred Stock was mandatorily redeemable and terms of the sale of Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants contained an embedded redemption liability feature which required the application of fair value accounting.

Accordingly, the proceeds received from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants were attributed to each of the instruments. The Company recorded the Series A Preferred Stock at a value of $5.1 million, which was recorded as a non-current liability, net of $0.3 million allocated issuance costs, on the unaudited condensed balance sheets. The Company recorded the embedded redemption liability of $15.5 million as a non-current liability on the unaudited condensed balance sheets. The issuance costs of $0.7 million attributable to the embedded redemption liability was charged to other expense, net on the unaudited condensed statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Subsequent remeasurement of the embedded redemption liability is determined by a valuation analysis each reporting period using fair value accounting Level 3 inputs developed on the then existing facts and circumstances. The Company records the remeasurement charge as other expense, net on the unaudited condensed statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company recorded a remeasurement charge of $0.3 million as other expense, net for the six months ended June 30, 2023. As of June 30, 2023, the Company embedded redemption liability was $15.8 million.

The Company's Series A Preferred Stock will be accreted to the estimated redemption value using the effective interest method through the Anniversary Based Redemption Date, with the changes in the carrying amount, including the accrual of dividends, recorded as interest expense on the unaudited condensed statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Interest expense of $1.6 million and $1.7 million from the periodic accretion to the redemption value was recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively.

Warrants

As of the Closing, the Company determined that the Warrants were equity instruments and $4.1 million relative fair value was attributed to the Warrants of the $25.0 million proceeds from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants. The Warrants value of $3.9 million was recorded as additional paid-in capital, net of $0.2 million of allocated issuance costs, on the unaudited condensed balance sheets.

As of June 30, 2023, there were 7,485,762 warrants, each exercisable for one share of common stock at price of $0.978885 per share and no warrants had been exercised.

Common Stock

In March 2020, the Company entered into a Controlled Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement ("Sales Agreement"), with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. ("Cantor Fitzgerald"), under which the Company may offer and sell, from time to time at its sole discretion through Cantor Fitzgerald, as its sales agent, shares of the Company's common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $75.0 million. The Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC, which will permit the offering, issuance and sale by the Company of up to a maximum aggregate offering price of $250.0 million of our securities, of which approximately $8.5 million of common stock may be issued and sold pursuant to the Sales Agreement.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, the Company sold 376,843 and 2,037,621 shares under the Sales Agreement for total net proceeds of approximately $0.4 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The Company did not sell any shares of common stock under the Sales Agreement during the three and six months ended June 30, 2022. As of June 30, 2023, the Company had sold a total of 4,921,956 shares of its common stock under the Sales Agreement, resulting in aggregate net proceeds of approximately $13.1 million.

10. Net Income (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders

The Company calculates basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share attributable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing the net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus potentially dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method, if dilutive. For the purposes of this calculation, warrants, stock options, restricted stock units and stock sold through the Company’s employee stock purchase plan are considered common stock equivalents.

A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of the basic and diluted net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share is as follows (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022			2023			2022
Numerator:
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders - basic	$	1,061	$	(17,351	)	$	(10,277	)	$	(37,672	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, basic		37,671,883	$	33,036,873			37,321,992			32,958,711
Potential dilutive stock-based options and awards		301,107		—			—			—
Weighted-average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, diluted		37,972,990		33,036,873			37,321,992			32,958,711
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share, basic	$	0.03	$	(0.53	)	$	(0.28	)	$	(1.14	)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share, diluted	$	0.03	$	(0.53	)	$	(0.28	)	$	(1.14	)

The following outstanding potentially dilutive common stock equivalents have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders for the periods presented due to their anti-dilutive effect:


	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2023		2022		2023		2022
Common stock options issued and outstanding		7,183,769		7,157,447		7,484,877		7,157,447
Warrants to purchase shares of common stock		7,485,762		—		7,485,762		—
Early exercised stock options subject to future vesting		—		1,152		—		1,152
Total		14,669,531		7,158,599		14,970,639		7,158,599

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following discussion and analysis contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. When reviewing the discussion below, you should keep in mind the substantial risks and uncertainties that could impact our business. In particular, we encourage you to review the risks and uncertainties described in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this report. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements contained in this report or implied by past results and trends. Forward-looking statements are statements that attempt to forecast or anticipate future developments in our business, financial condition or results of operations. See the section titled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this report. These statements, like all statements in this report, speak only as of their date (unless another date is indicated), and we undertake no obligation to update or revise these statements in light of future developments, except as required by law.

Overview

We are a clinical-stage immunotherapy company developing a novel class of T cell engagers that harness the power of the body’s immune system to treat patients suffering from cancer and other diseases. T cell engagers are engineered proteins that direct a patient’s own T cells to kill target cells that express specific proteins, or antigens, carried by the target cells. We are developing a pipeline of novel T cell engagers initially focused on the treatment of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. In addition to our product candidates utilizing our TriTAC technology, we have also nominated our first clinical candidate using our proprietary ProTriTAC platform, a prodrug version of our TriTAC platform, designed to expand the target space for T cell engagers and bring the benefits of TriTACs to a broader number of patients.

TriTAC

Our TriTAC product candidates in ongoing clinical development include HPN217 in a Phase 1 clinical trial targeting B-cell maturation antigen, or BCMA, for the treatment of multiple myeloma, and HPN328 in a Phase 1/2 clinical trial targeting Delta-like canonical Notch ligand 3, or DLL3, for the treatment of small cell lung cancer, or SCLC, and other DLL3-expressing tumors.

TriTAC Pipeline Update

HPN217

In January 2021, HPN217 received orphan drug designation for the treatment of multiple myeloma. In March 2022, HPN217 was granted fast track designation for the treatment of relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma.

In December 2022, we announced the interim results of ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial of HPN217. As of the October 17, 2022 data cut-off date, 62 patients had been treated across fixed and step doses up to 2.86 mg/week in fixed dosing cohorts and 24 mg/week target dose in step dosing cohorts. Enrolled patients had a median of 6 prior therapies. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events, or TEAEs, occurring in greater than 15% were anemia (44%), fatigue (32%), and transient cytokine release syndrome or CRS (27%). No grade 3 or higher CRS was reported in this patient population as of the October 17, 2022 data cut-off date. Two DLTs, of reversible transaminitis were reported at a fixed dose of 2.86 mg was reported. A maximum tolerated dose, or MTD, has not been reached at the target dose in step dosing regimens. Following our results announced at ASH in December 2022, one patient experienced Grade 3 CRS and Grade 1 Immune Effector Cell Associated Neurotoxicity, or ICANS, which was followed by a post-traumatic Grade 5 subdural hematoma. Overall, a well-tolerated safety profile continues to emerge, with low incidence of CRS across the patient population studied to date.

HPN217 was active across a wide dose range (2.15 to 24 mg), with 77% (10/13) overall response rate, or ORR, observed across the highest step doses (12 and 24 mg). Additionally, 86% (18/21) of responders remain on study treatment with sustained response, with many responders on treatment for over a year. Three patients in the study were evaluated for minimal residual disease, or MRD, and all three were MRD negative (<105).

HPN217 demonstrated a dose proportional increase in Cmax and area under the curve, or AUC, with a median serum half-life of 66 hours, confirming half-life extension. Half-life, clearance rate, and volume of distribution were dose-independent, suggesting linear PK kinetics. Pharmacodynamic analysis shows a trend of attenuation in cytokine and chemokine (IL-6, IL-8, TNFα) spikes upon administration of target doses compared to step doses.

In June 2023, we announced the completion of planned enrollment in the Phase 1 dose escalation trial. An abstract detailing the 12mg cohort from the Phase 1 trial has been accepted for poster presentation at the 30th International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting, being held September 27-30, 2023 in Athens. Presentation of the full Phase 1 data set, including 24mg cohorts, is expected by the end of 2023.

HPN217 is covered by a global Development and Option Agreement with AbbVie. HPN217 targets B-cell maturation antigen, or BCMA, a well-validated target expressed on multiple myeloma cells. Harpoon is responsible for conducting the Phase 1 dose escalation study and delivering a data set to AbbVie. Under the agreement with AbbVie, we are eligible to receive future payments totaling up to $430 million upon AbbVie’s exercise of an exclusive license option and achievement of certain development, regulatory, and commercial milestones, in addition to royalties on commercial sales. We anticipate delivery of the Phase 1 trial data set to AbbVie by the end of 2023.

HPN328

We are currently enrolling patients in a Phase 1/2 clinical trial, HPN328, for the treatment of small cell lung cancer, or SCLC, and other tumors associated with DLL3 expression. Dose escalation is ongoing in monotherapy cohorts of HPN328 and enrollment in combination cohorts with atezolizumab (Tecentriq®) for the treatment of patients with SCLC is planned to commence in Q3 2023. The MTD, which has not yet been reached.

In March 2022, we received orphan drug designation for the treatment of SCLC.

In April 2022, we entered into a Master Clinical Supply Agreement with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, or Roche, for the supply of atezolizumab (Tecentriq®) in combination with HPN328 for the treatment of patients with SCLC. Under this agreement, we are the sponsor of the anticipated clinical trials, and Roche will supply atezolizumab.

In June 2022, at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting, we provided a clinical update on our ongoing Phase 1/2 clinical trial. As of the April 21, 2022, data-cutoff date, 18 patients had been enrolled in dose cohorts ranging from 15 µg to 1200 µg per week in both fixed and step dose cohorts administered once weekly by intravenous infusion. Eighteen patients with a median of 2 lines (range 1 to 5) of prior therapy have been enrolled and eligible patients include small cell lung cancer patients who have relapsed after platinum chemotherapy and patients with other malignancies with high grade neuroendocrine tumors associated with DLL3 expression. HPN328 has been well tolerated with Grade 1-2 CRS reported in 27% of patients. No dose-limiting toxicities, or DLTs, were observed and a maximum tolerated dose, or MTD, has not been reached. Seven of 18 patients (39%) had a decrease in sum of target lesion diameters, with 3 of 11 patients (27%) with SCLC across all dose cohorts experiencing a greater than 30% decrease in sum of target lesion diameters. Additionally, 4 of 6 patients (67%) with SCLC treated at greater than or equal to 1215 µg per week experienced a decrease in sum of target lesion diameters, including one confirmed Partial Response (cPR) per RECIST criteria. The patient with a cPR experienced a target lesion reduction of 53% at week 10.

In December 2022, we lowered the priming dose to 1mg and excluded patients requiring oxygen prior to dosing after we reported two events of Grade 3 CRS in November 2022 following an initial 2mg priming dose of HPN328.

Phase 1/2 dose and schedule optimization in monotherapy cohorts enrolling at 12mg and 24mg target doses is ongoing. Early observations in the monotherapy cohorts included encouraging signs of anti-tumor activity, with confirmed responses per RECIST in patients with SCLC and in patients with other neuroendocrine tumor types. An abstract with interim data has been accepted for poster presentation at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) being held October 20-24, 2023 in Madrid.

Enrollment in combination therapy cohorts of HPN328 with atezolizumab (Tecentriq®) in patients with SCLC, as part of the Phase 1/2 dose escalation trial, is anticipated to initiate in the third quarter of 2023.

Completion of the Phase 1 monotherapy regimen exploration is expected in the second half of 2023, including the identification of the recommended Phase 2 regimen(s) in the monotherapy setting by the end of 2023.

ProTriTAC Pipeline Update

In December 2021, as a part of our pipeline update, we also presented advancements in our second platform, ProTriTAC, which was designed to expand the universe of addressable targets and indications for T cell engagers. We have nominated the first ProTriTAC clinical candidate, HPN601, with Investigational New Drug application, or IND, enabling studies underway, and we expect to provide additional development updates later this year. Our ProTriTAC platform applies a prodrug concept to create a therapeutic T cell engager that remains inactive until it reaches the tumor. ProTriTACs therefore have the potential for additional tumor specificity and enhanced safety profiles because they are designed to have limited interaction with their molecular targets in healthy tissue, allowing us to target tumor-associated antigens that may be more broadly expressed. When a ProTriTAC penetrates a tumor, tumor-associated proteases cleave off the blocking domain of the ProTriTAC, thereby enabling the engagement of T cells to subsequently kill tumor cells. This activation process also diminishes the half-life of the resulting T cell engager. If active molecules leave the tumor tissue, they are rapidly eliminated from the body, therefore further limiting the potential side effects in normal tissues.

In April 2023 at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) annual meeting, we presented two new candidates for IND-enabling studies from the ProTriTAC platform that had been identified against the targets trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP2) and Integrin-β6 (ITGB6). TROP2 is a glycoprotein that spans the epithelial membrane surface and plays a role in cell self-renewal, proliferation, and transformation. ITGB6 is a protein that is encoded by the ITGB6 gene and are adhesion receptors that function in signaling from the extracellular matrix to the cell.

HPN601

Our first ProTriTAC candidate is currently in preclinical development. HPN601 targets the epithelial cell adhesion molecule, or EpCAM, which is expressed on variety of solid tumors. IND filing timeline to enable a Phase 1 dose exploration study will be dependent on available resources.

TriTAC-XR Platform

In April 2022, we presented preclinical data on TriTAC-XR at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC). The poster presentation demonstrated that TriTAC-XR and its underlying extended-release mechanism represents a new approach to managing CRS, either alone or in combination with other existing CRS-mitigation approaches. The expected safety improvements would enable T cell engagers targeting immune cells to broaden its adoption from oncology to autoimmune and other non-oncology diseases.

Business Operations

Since commencing operations in 2015, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to performing research and development and manufacturing activities in support of our product development efforts, hiring personnel, raising capital to support and expand such activities and providing general and administrative support for these operations. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We have funded our operations to date primarily from proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes, the sale of redeemable convertible preferred stock, Series A Preferred Stock and warrants, the sale of common stock and payments received under our collaboration agreement with AbbVie.

Since our inception, we have incurred significant net operating losses. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our current or future product candidates and programs.

In November 2022, we announced a corporate restructuring and a reduction in workforce of approximately 45% of our headcount to focus our resources on our clinical pipeline, including HPN217, HPN328 and HPN601. The restructuring was completed in June 2023. We paid $1.4 million and $0.5 million in employee termination benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2022, respectively.

As part of the restructuring, we completed activities to reduce our corporate facilities footprint. In June 2023, we sublet all of our Cove Lease research labs and associated offices at our facility located in South San Francisco and relocated to offices at our Gateway Lease. We recorded a $1.7 million non-cash impairment charge for the three months ended June 30, 2023 related to the office relocation. See Note 8 Restructuring to our unaudited condensed financial statements included elsewhere in this report for more information.

In March 2023, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, or Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we sold and issued (i) 25,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and (ii) warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 7,485,762 shares of our Common Stock, or the Warrants. The shares of Series A Preferred Stock and accompanying Warrants were sold at a purchase price of $1,000 per share of Series A Preferred Stock. The total gross proceeds we received from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants in the Private Placement were approximately $25.0 million, which does not include any proceeds that may be received upon exercise of the Warrants. As of June 30, 2023, there were 7,485,762 warrants issued and outstanding, each exercisable for one share of common stock at price of $0.978885 per share and no warrants had been exercised. See Note 9 Equity and Note 10 Net Income (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders to our unaudited condensed financial statements included elsewhere in this report for more information.

Our net income attributable to common stockholders was $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023. Our net loss attributable to common stockholders was $17.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022. As of June 30, 2023, we had an accumulated deficit of $362.8 million. Our primary use of cash is to fund net losses attributable to common stockholders, operating expenses, which consist primarily of research and development expenditures, and to a lesser extent, general and administrative expenditures. We expect to continue to incur net losses attributable to common stockholders for the foreseeable future, and we expect our research and development expenses and our general and administrative expenses will continue to increase.

We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for at least the next several years. Our net losses attributable to common stockholders may fluctuate significantly from period to period, depending on the timing of our planned clinical trials and expenditures on other research and development activities. We expect our expenses will increase substantially over time as we:

•

continue the research and development of HPN217, HPN328, and HPN601, as well as any other product candidates;

•

initiate preclinical studies and clinical trials for any additional product candidates that we may pursue in the future;

•

seek marketing approvals for product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials;

•

establish a sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution infrastructure to commercialize any product candidate for which we may obtain marketing approval;

•

maintain and protect our portfolio of intellectual property rights, including patents, trade secrets and know-how;

•

implement operational, financial and management systems; and

•

attract, hire and retain additional administrative, clinical, regulatory and scientific personnel.

Furthermore, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company, including significant legal, accounting, investor relations and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.

From October 2020 through June 30, 2023, pursuant to our Sales Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald, we received an aggregate of approximately $13.1 million in net proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock. For the six months ended June 30, 2023, we received an aggregate of approximately $1.9 million in net proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock under such Sales Agreement.

Collaborations with AbbVie

Development and Option Agreement

On November 20, 2019, we entered into a Development and Option Agreement, which we refer to, as amended, as the Development and Option Agreement, with AbbVie in connection with our HPN217 program, which targets B cell maturation antigen, or BCMA. Pursuant to such agreement, we granted to AbbVie an option to a worldwide, exclusive license to our patents and know-how applicable to the HPN217 program to develop, manufacture, and commercialize products arising from the HPN217 program and targeting BCMA, or HPN217 Products. Under the Development and Option Agreement, we filed an IND for HPN217 and are responsible for conducting clinical development activities pursuant to a mutually agreed upon development plan, including conducting a Phase 1 trial of HPN217, in order for AbbVie to determine whether it wishes to exercise its option to a worldwide, exclusive license to such HPN217 program. We initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial in April 2020.

completion of certain development activities by us under the development plan, AbbVie will be solely responsible, at its cost, for the development, manufacture and commercialization of HPN217 and any other HPN217 Products. AbbVie is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and obtain regulatory approval for one HPN217 Product, for at least one indication, for use in each Major Market (as defined in the Development and Option Agreement).

AbbVie paid an upfront payment of $30.0 million and, in June 2020, a development milestone payment of $50.0 million, as we dosed our first patient in the Phase 1 trial of HPN217 in April 2020. If AbbVie exercises its option, AbbVie will pay us an option exercise fee of $200.0 million. Following option exercise, AbbVie will be required to make further payments to us of up to $230.0 million in the aggregate for the achievement of specified development, regulatory and commercial sales milestones for HPN217 Products. We will also receive tiered royalties on net sales by AbbVie, its affiliates and sublicensees of HPN217 Products at percentages ranging from the high single digits to the very low double digits, subject to specified offsets and reductions. Royalties will be payable under the Development and Option Agreement on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis commencing on the date of first commercial sale of HPN217 and other HPN217 Products, and ending on the later of expiration of all valid claims of specified licensed patents in such country, expiration of regulatory exclusivity in such country, or ten years following first commercial sale of such HPN217 Product in such country.

We recognize revenue associated with the performance obligation as the initial development activities are performed using an input method, according to the costs incurred as related to the estimated costs for the development and regulatory activities to be performed through the delivery of the HPN217 Opt-in report. The transfer of control occurs over this time period and, in management’s judgment, is the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligation. Such estimates are reviewed by us on a periodic basis and, if necessary, we will adjust the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.

In June 2023, we announced we had completed planned patient enrollment in the Phase 1 clinical trial and had agreed with AbbVie on the patient follow up time required to collect and compile the Opt-in report data. As a result, the estimate of delivering the Opt-in report was accelerated and we noted a change in the measurement of performance obligation based on remaining efforts around collecting and analyzing the data from the Phase 1 clinical trial and delivering the Opt-in report to AbbVie in order for AbbVie to make a decision on whether it will exercise its option to a worldwide, exclusive license. In the three months ended June 30, 2023, we realized additional deferred revenue of $4.2 million from the change in estimate.

Accordingly, of the $30.0 million upfront payment received in 2019 and $50.0 million development milestone received in 2020, $10.4 million and $17.2 million of revenue was recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively. As of June 30, 2023, we had $4.5 million of deferred revenue under the Development and Option Agreement.

Amended and Restated Discovery Collaboration Agreement

On August 16, 2021, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Discovery Collaboration and License Agreement, or the First Amendment, with AbbVie, which amends the Amended and Restated Discovery Collaboration and License Agreement, or, as amended by the First Amendment, the Restated Collaboration Agreement, entered on November 20, 2019, between us and AbbVie, which agreement amends and restates the Discovery Collaboration and License Agreement entered into between us and AbbVie, dated October 20, 2017 and amended April 3, 2019, or the Original Collaboration Agreement. Pursuant to the First Amendment, we and AbbVie agreed to include the ProTriTAC technology within the Restated Collaboration Agreement. Pursuant to the Original Collaboration Agreement, we granted to AbbVie worldwide exclusive rights to develop and commercialize products that incorporate our proprietary TriTAC technology together with soluble TCRs provided by AbbVie that bind to targets accepted by the parties. Under the terms of the Original Collaboration Agreement, AbbVie was granted the right to designate up to two targets for development of TriTAC constructs, which it selected in 2017 and 2019, respectively. Pursuant to the Restated Collaboration Agreement, AbbVie is permitted to designate two further targets, with an option to select up to four additional targets, selected during a specified period following the effective date, to be the subject of activities under the collaboration, and is granted a worldwide, exclusive license to develop and commercialize products that incorporate either our proprietary TriTAC platform technology, or (as a result of and pursuant to the First Amendment) our ProTriTAC platform technology, together with soluble T cell receptors, or TCRs. Such products may incorporate antibodies provided by AbbVie or by us. During a period of up to four years following the date of AbbVie’s designation of each target for the products, and subject to confirmation of target availability, we and AbbVie will conduct certain research and discovery activities under a mutually agreed discovery and research plan in connection with the creation and evaluation of constructs comprising our proprietary TriTAC or ProTriTAC technologies, in conjunction with the soluble TCR or antibody sequences directed at the agreed upon targets of interest. We may not, including through any third party, develop or commercialize any competing product that binds to any of the included targets. As was the case under the Original Collaboration Agreement, following the discovery phase, AbbVie will be solely responsible, at its cost, for the development, manufacture and commercialization of the products that arise from the activities under the discovery plan. AbbVie is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize one such product directed to each target for which the discovery activities were completed in each Major Market (as defined in the Restated Collaboration Agreement).

In addition to the upfront payment of $17.0 million already paid under the Original Collaboration Agreement, we received an upfront payment of $20.0 million under the Restated Collaboration Agreement for AbbVie’s right to select two further targets and an option to select up to four further targets. AbbVie will be required to make payments to us, upon target selection, of $10.0 million for each target, for up to four additional targets selected by AbbVie. For each of the up to eight targets selected, we are eligible to receive up to $300.0 million in the aggregate for the achievement of specified development, regulatory and commercial sales milestones for licensed products indicated for human therapeutic or prophylactic use. We will also be eligible to receive tiered royalties on net sales by AbbVie, its affiliates and sublicensees of licensed products, at percentages in the mid-single digits, subject to specified offsets and reductions. Royalties will be payable under the Restated Collaboration Agreement on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis commencing on the date of first commercial sale of each product and ending on the later of expiration of all valid claims of specified licensed patents in such country, expiration of regulatory exclusivity in such country or ten years following first commercial sale of such product in such country. If licensed products are developed and commercialized for diagnostic or veterinary use, or certain screening or monitoring uses, the parties have agreed to negotiate an appropriate reduction in the economic terms applicable to such non-therapeutic and prophylactic applications.

We recognized revenue under the Original Collaboration Agreement over a period in which related research and development activities occur. We had recognized the full $17.0 million upfront payment related to the initial two targets prior to 2022.

We recognize revenue under the Restated Collaboration Agreement over a period in which related research and development activities occur. As of June 30, 2023, we determined that a transaction price of $20.0 million was still appropriate and that we had completed the performance obligation for the two additional targets. As such, the entire $20.0 million was recognized. We recognized $9.9 million and zero million in revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022, respectively. We recognized $11.6 million and zero revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022, respectively. As of June 30, 2023, we had no deferred revenue balance under the Restated Collaboration Agreement.

Financial Operations Overview

Revenue

We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. Our collaboration and license revenue to date is related to work performed by us under the Restated Collaboration Agreement and Development and Option Agreement and is recognized when designated research and development services are performed. To date, we have not received any milestone or royalty payments under the Original Collaboration Agreement or the Restated Collaboration Agreement. We expect that any collaboration and license revenue we generate from the Restated Collaboration Agreement and the Development and Option Agreement and any future collaboration partners will fluctuate from period to period as a result of the timing and amount of milestones and other payments. Additionally, for research and development services that we recognize over time, we measure our progress using an input method. The input methods we use are based on the effort we expend or costs we incur toward the satisfaction of our performance obligation. We estimate the amount of effort we expend, including the time we estimate it will take us to complete the activities, or costs we incur in a given period, relative to the estimated total effort or costs to satisfy the performance obligation. This results in a percentage that we multiply by the transaction price to determine the amount of revenue we recognize each period. This approach requires us to make numerous estimates and use significant judgement. If our estimates or judgments change over the course of the collaboration, they may affect the timing and amount of revenue that we recognize in the current and future periods.

Operating Expenses

Research and Development

Research and development expenses represent costs incurred in performing research, development and manufacturing activities in support of our own product development efforts and those of our collaborators, and include salaries, employee benefits, stock-based compensation, laboratory supplies, outsourced research and development expenses, professional services and allocated facilities-related costs. We expense both internal and external research and development expenses as they are incurred. We do not allocate our costs by product candidates, as our research and development expenses include internal costs, such as payroll and other personnel expenses, and external costs, neither of which are tracked by product candidate. In particular, with respect to internal costs, several of our departments support multiple product candidate research and development programs. Non-refundable advance payments for

services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities are recorded as prepaid expenses and recognized as expenses as the related services are performed.

We expect our research and development expenses to continue to increase substantially in absolute dollars for the foreseeable future as we advance our product candidates into and through preclinical studies and clinical trials, pursue regulatory approval of our product candidates and expand our pipeline of product candidates. The process of conducting the necessary preclinical and clinical research to obtain regulatory approval is costly and time consuming. The actual probability of success for our product candidates may be affected by a variety of factors, including the safety and efficacy of our product candidates, early clinical data, investment in our clinical programs, the ability of collaborators to successfully develop our licensed product candidates, competition, manufacturing capability and commercial viability. We may never succeed in achieving regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, we are unable to determine the duration and completion costs of our research and development projects or when and to what extent we will generate revenue from the commercialization and sale of our product candidates.

General and Administrative

Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, allocated facilities costs and other expenses for outside professional services, including legal, human resource, audit and accounting services. Personnel costs consist of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation. We expect to continue to incur expenses as a result of operating as a public company, including expenses related to compliance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, Nasdaq and any other securities exchange on which our securities are traded, insurance expenses, investor relations activities and other administrative and professional services.

Restructuring and Impairment

In June 2023 we completed the restructuring plan, including initiatives to reduce our corporate facilities footprint. In June 2023, we sublet all of our Cove Lease research labs and associated offices and relocated to offices under the Gateway Lease. For the three months ended June 30, 2023, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.9 million to the Cove Lease right-of-use assets and $0.8 million to the Cove Lease leasehold improvements reducing the carrying value to fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach.

Interest Income, net

Interest income, net is primarily comprised of interest income on cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.

Interest Expense

Interest expense is due to accretion of the redemption value of the Series A Preferred Stock.

Other Expense, net

Other expense, net is primarily comprised of the fair value change in the embedded redemption liability, amortization of deferred equity issuance costs and foreign currency transaction gains or losses related to certain transactions with European third-party vendors.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,												For the Six Months Ended June 30,
							Change												Change
	2023			2022			($)			(%)			2023			2022			($)			(%)
	(dollars in thousands)												(dollars in thousands)
Revenue:
Collaboration and license revenue	$	20,221		$	8,303		$	11,918			144	%	$	28,804		$	14,209		$	14,595			103	%
Total revenue		20,221			8,303			11,918			144	%		28,804			14,209			14,595			103	%
Operating expenses:
Research and development		12,196			20,651			(8,455	)		-41	%		27,359			41,469			(14,110	)		-34	%
General and administrative		3,803			5,063			(1,260	)		-25	%		7,988			10,464			(2,476	)		-24	%
Impairment of long-lived assets		1,729			—			1,729		*				1,729			—			1,729		*
Total operating expenses		17,728			25,714			(7,986	)		-31	%		37,076			51,933			(14,857	)		-29	%
Income (loss) from operations		2,493			(17,411	)		(19,904	)		-114	%		(8,272	)		(37,724	)		29,452			78	%
Interest income, net		615			104			511			492	%		1,040			144			896			622	%
Interest expense		(1,560	)		—			1,560		*				(1,698	)		—			(1,698	)	*
Other expense, net		(488	)		(44	)		444		*				(1,347	)		(92	)		(1,255	)	*
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	1,061		$	(17,351	)	$	18,412			106	%	$	(10,277	)	$	(37,672	)	$	27,395			-73	%
* Not meaningful

Revenue

Collaboration and license revenue increased by $11.9 million, or 144%, for the three months ended June 30, 2023, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2022. The increase was primarily due to a $9.9 million revenue recognized in the second quarter of 2023 for completion of all research and development services performed under the Restated Collaboration Agreement, and a $2.1 million increase in revenue recognized related to the Development and Option Agreement, for research and development services performed.

Collaboration and license revenue increased by $14.6 million, or 103%, for the six months ended June 30, 2023, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022. The increase was primarily due to a $11.6 million revenue recognized for research and development services performed under the Restated Collaboration Agreement, and a $3.0 million increase in revenue recognized related to the Development and Option Agreement, for research and development services performed.

Research and Development

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses incurred during the respective periods:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023		2022		2023		2022
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Product and clinical development	$	4,632	$	9,830	$	11,070	$	18,384
Research and technology services		396		546		863		1,429
Laboratory supplies and equipment		259		696		261		1,247
Pharmacology services		—		76		—		429
Personnel-related		3,500		6,710		8,153		14,427
Facility and other allocated expenses		1,782		2,143		3,858		4,187
Consulting		1,627		650		3,154		1,366
Total research and development expenses	$	12,196	$	20,651	$	27,359	$	41,469

Research and development expenses decreased by $8.5 million, or 41%, for the three months ended June 30, 2023, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a $3.4 million decrease in personnel and research activities associated with the corporate restructuring, a $5.2 million decrease in product and clinical development expense due to the termination and winddown of HPN424 and HPN536 studies, a $0.1 million decrease in pharmacology services and research and technology services due to the termination and winddown of HPN424 and HPN536 studies, and a $0.8 million decrease in laboratory supplies and facility as a result of winddown in research activities associated with the corporate restructuring partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in consulting expenses.

Research and development expenses decreased by $14.1 million, or 34%, for the six months ended June 30, 2023, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a $6.9 million decrease in personnel and research activities associated with the corporate restructuring, a $7.3 million decrease in product and clinical development expense due to the termination and winddown of HPN424 and HPN536 studies, a $0.4 million decrease in pharmacology services and research and technology services due to the termination and winddown of HPN424 and HPN536 studies, and a $1.3 million decrease in laboratory supplies and equipment as a result of winddown in research activities associated with the corporate restructuring partially offset by a $1.8 million increase in consulting expenses.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses decreased by $1.3 million, or 25%, for the three months ended June 30, 2023, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a $1.0 million decrease in personnel-related expenses attributed primarily to a decrease in stock-based compensation expense, a $0.3 million decrease in legal and consulting fees related to corporate legal and accounting services, and a $0.1 million decrease in marketing costs related to market research, offset by a $0.1 million increase in facility and other allocated expenses.

General and administrative expenses decreased by $2.5 million, or 24%, for the six months ended June 30, 2023, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a $1.7 million decrease in personnel-related expenses attributed primarily to a decrease in stock-based compensation expense, a $0.8 million decrease in legal and consulting fees related to corporate legal and accounting services, and a $0.3 million decrease in marketing costs related to market research, offset by a $0.3 million increase in facility and other allocated expenses.

Restructuring and Impairment

We initiated activities to reduce our corporate facilities footprint. In June 2023, we sublet all of our Cove Lease research labs and associated offices and relocated to a smaller office under the Gateway Lease. For the three months ended June 30, 2023, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.9 million to the Cove Lease right-of-use assets and $0.8 million to the Cove Lease leasehold improvements related to the relocation of the office.

Interest Income, net

Interest income, net increased by $0.5 million, or 492%, for the three months ended June 30, 2023, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2022. The increase is due to higher interest yields earned on higher average cash, money-market and short-term securities balances and accretion income of discounts from marketable securities during the period.

Interest income, net increased by $0.9 million, or 622%, for the six months ended June 30, 2023, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022. The increase is due to higher interest yields earned on higher average cash, money-market and short-term securities and net accretion income of discounts in 2023 from marketable securities during the period.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $1.6 million and $1.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, compared to zero for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022. The interest expense is due to accretion of the redemption value attributable to Series A Preferred Stock issued in the six months ended June 30, 2023.

Other Expense, net

Other expense, net increased by $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2022. The increase is primarily due to $0.3 million fair value change in the embedded redemption liability and $0.1 million of issuance costs allocated to the embedded redemption liability value associated with the Series A Preferred Stock issued in the period.

Other expense, net increased by $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022. The increase is primarily due to $0.3 million fair value change in the embedded redemption liability and $1.0 million of issuance costs allocated to the embedded redemption liability value associated with the Series A Preferred Stock issued in the period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

Since our inception and through June 30, 2023, we have financed our operations primarily through proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes, the sale of redeemable convertible preferred stock and warrants, the sale of Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants, the sale of common stock, and upfront payments received by us from our collaboration and license agreements. As of June 30, 2023, we had $45.6 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, an accumulated deficit of $362.8 million and working capital of $23.7 million.

From October 2020 through June 30, 2023, pursuant to our Sales Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald, we received an aggregate of approximately $13.1 million in net proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock. We received an aggregate of approximately $0.4 million and $1.9 million in net proceeds for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, from the sale of shares of our common stock under such Sales Agreement.

In November 2022, we announced a corporate restructuring and a reduction in workforce of approximately 45% of our headcount, to focus our resources on our clinical pipeline, which includes HPN217 (BCMA), HPN328 (DLL3), HPN601 (EpCAM). The restructuring was completed in June 2023. We paid $1.4 million and $0.5 million in employee termination benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2022, respectively.

In March 2023, we sold and issued (i) 25,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and (ii) Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 7,485,762 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The shares of Series A Preferred Stock and accompanying Warrants were sold at a purchase price of $1,000 per share of Series A Preferred Stock. The total gross proceeds we received from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants in the Private Placement was approximately $25.0 million, which does not include any proceeds that may be received upon exercise of the Warrants.

As of June 30, 2023, there were 7,485,762 warrants issued and outstanding, each exercisable for one share of common stock at price of $0.978885 per share and no warrants had been exercised.

We believe that, as of June 30, 2023, our cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities, combined with cost savings from our restructuring and facility reduction discussed above, provide sufficient capital resources to continue our operations for at least 12 months from the issuance date of the unaudited condensed financial statements included in this report.

We will require substantial additional capital in order to complete development of our product candidates and commercialize our products, if approved. We may seek to raise any necessary additional capital through a combination of public or private equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances, licensing arrangements and other marketing and distribution arrangements, or we may seek to control expenses by delaying certain candidates in our portfolio and reducing internal expenditures.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in acquiring additional funding at levels sufficient to fund our operations or on terms favorable to us. Please see the section entitled “Risk Factors”, including the risk factors titled “We will require additional funding in order to complete development of our product candidates and commercialize our products, if approved. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts,” and “Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates” for additional risks associated with our substantial capital requirements and the challenges we may face in raising capital.

Capital Resources

Our primary uses of cash are to fund net losses attributable to common stockholders and operating expenses, which consist primarily of funding our clinical and preclinical trials, research and development expenditures and related personnel costs. Cash used to fund operating expenses is impacted by the timing of when we pay these expenses, as reflected in the change in our outstanding accounts payable and accrued expenses. The timing and amount of our future funding requirements depends on many factors, including the following:

•

the scope, rate of progress, results and cost of our preclinical studies, clinical trials and other related activities;

•

the cost of manufacturing clinical supplies, and establishing commercial supplies, of our product candidates and any products that we may develop;

•

the number and characteristics of product candidates that we pursue;

•

the cost, timing and outcomes of regulatory approvals;

•

the cost and timing of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities;

•

the terms and timing of any other collaborative, licensing and other arrangements that we may establish and the receipt of potential development and milestone payments thereunder;

•

the timing, receipt and amount of sales, profit sharing or royalties, if any, from our potential products;

•

the cost of preparing, filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights;

•

the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products or technologies, although we currently have no commitments or agreements relating to any of these types of transactions;

•

the compliance and administrative costs associated with being a public company; and

•

the cost of attracting, hiring and retaining additional administrative, clinical, regulatory and scientific personnel.

In March 2020, we entered into a Sales Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald under which we may offer and sell, from time to time at our sole discretion through Cantor Fitzgerald, as our sales agent, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $75.0 million. We have filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC, which will permit the offering, issuance and sale by us of up to a maximum aggregate offering price of $250.0 million of our securities, of which approximately $8.5 million of common stock may be issued and sold pursuant to our Sales Agreement. Cantor Fitzgerald may sell the common stock by any method permitted by law deemed to be an “at the market offering” or ATM facility as defined in Rule 415(a)(4) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, including sales made directly on or through Nasdaq or on any other existing trading market for our common stock. We pay Cantor Fitzgerald a commission up to 3.0% of the gross sales proceeds of any shares of our common stock sold through Cantor Fitzgerald under the Sales Agreement.

From October 2020 through June 30, 2023, we had sold a total of 4,921,956 shares of our common stock under the Sales Agreement, resulting in aggregate net proceeds of $13.1 million. We received an aggregate of approximately $0.4 million and $1.9 million in net proceeds for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, from the sale of shares of our common stock under such Sales Agreement. As of June 30, 2023, our current maximum allowable amount of common stock we can sale is $8.5 million. As of June 30, 2023, there was approximately $61.9 million remaining available under the terms of the Sales Agreement.

Cash Flows


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2023			2022
	(In thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by:
Operating activities	$	(34,462	)	$	(46,841	)
Investing activities		(9,935	)		69,840
Financing activities		25,580			882
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash	$	(18,817	)	$	23,881

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2023, cash used in operating activities was $34.5 million, which consisted of a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $10.3 million and a net change of $33.2 million in our net operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by $9.0 million in non-cash charges. The change in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to a decrease in deferred revenue of $28.8 million resulting from the recognition of revenue related to the AbbVie Restated Collaboration Agreement and the Development Option Agreement, an increase in prepaid expenses and other assets of $1.9 million resulting primarily from the timing of payments made for ongoing research and development activities, a decrease of $1.8 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and a decrease of $0.8 million in operating lease obligations. The non-cash charges consisted of stock-based compensation of $2.2 million, Cove Lease right-of-use assets and leasehold improvements asset impairment of $1.7 million, accretion of the redemption value discount attributable to the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock of $1.7 million, issuance costs for Series A Preferred Stock of $1.1 million, depreciation and amortization of $1.0 million, non-cash lease expense of $0.6 million, loss on sale and disposal of fixed assets of $0.4 million, and change in fair value of embedded redemption liability of $0.3 million.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2023, cash used in investing activities of $9.9 million was primarily from $12.7 million in purchases of short-term marketable securities partially offset by $1.5 million in proceeds from the maturities of short-term marketable securities and $1.3 million in proceeds from the sale of equipment.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2023, cash provided by financing activities of $25.6 million was primarily from $23.9 million in net proceeds received from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock, $1.8 million in net proceeds from the sale of our common stock pursuant to our Sales Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald, and $0.1 million in proceeds from purchases of our common stock under our 2019 employee stock purchase plan, partially offset by $0.2 million of payments of deferred issuance costs.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

See Note 6 Commitments and Contingencies to our unaudited condensed financial statements included elsewhere in this report for more information on the changes in our contractual obligations and other commitments from those described in “—Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, included in our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, as filed with the SEC on March 27, 2023.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of unaudited condensed financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses. Our critical accounting policies are those that significantly impact our financial condition and results of operations and require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Because of this uncertainty, actual results may vary from these estimates.

See Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our unaudited condensed financial statements included elsewhere in this report for more information.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our unaudited condensed financial statements included elsewhere in this report for more information.

Emerging Growth Company Status

We are an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We elected to use this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until the earlier of the date that we (i) are no longer an emerging growth company or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period provided in the JOBS Act. We expect to use the extended transition period for any other new or revised accounting standards during the period in which we remain an emerging growth company.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of our first fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenues of at least $1.235 billion or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700.0 million as of the prior June 30th and (ii) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information in this section.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2023 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitation on the Effectiveness of Internal Control

The effectiveness of any system of internal control over financial reporting, including ours, is subject to inherent limitations, including the exercise of judgment in designing, implementing, operating, and evaluating the controls and procedures, and the inability to eliminate misconduct completely. Accordingly, in designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any system of internal control over financial reporting, including ours, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable, not absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. We intend to continue to monitor and upgrade our internal controls as necessary or appropriate for our business but cannot assure you that such improvements will be sufficient to provide us with effective internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.

We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us due to defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, negative publicity, reputational harm and other factors.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below before making an investment decision, together with all of the other information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and under Part 1, Item 1A "Risk Factors" included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. The risks described below are not the only ones facing us. The occurrence of any of the following risks, or of additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Summary of Risk Factors

Our business is subject to a number of risks that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. These risks are discussed more fully below and include, but are not limited to:

•

All of our product candidates are in preclinical or early-stage clinical development. Clinical drug development is a lengthy and expensive process with uncertain timelines and uncertain outcomes. If clinical trials of our product candidates are prolonged or delayed, we or any collaborators may be unable to obtain required regulatory approvals, and therefore may be unable to commercialize our product candidates on a timely basis or at all.

•

Interim, topline or preliminary data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data become available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.

•

Our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms are unproven, novel classes of T cell engagers and may not result in approvable or marketable products, which exposes us to unforeseen risks and makes it difficult for us to predict the time and cost of product development and potential for regulatory approval.

•

Results of earlier preclinical studies of our product candidates may not be predictive of future trial results.

•

We depend on enrollment of patients in our clinical trials for our product candidates. If we experience delays or difficulties enrolling in our clinical trials, our research and development efforts and business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

•

Our product candidates may have serious adverse, undesirable or unacceptable side effects or other properties which may delay or prevent marketing approval. Such side effects could result in us needing to abandon the development of our related product candidates, the commercial profile of any approved label may be limited, or we may be subject to other significant negative consequences following marketing approval, if any.

•

Monitoring safety of patients receiving our product candidates is challenging, which could adversely affect our ability to obtain regulatory approval and commercialize.

•

We may not be successful in our efforts to use and expand our technology platforms, including TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR to build a pipeline of product candidates.

•

We will require additional funding in order to complete development of our product candidates and commercialize our products, if approved. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.

•

We are an early clinical-stage company and have incurred significant losses since our inception. We expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.

•

We currently do not meet, and may not regain compliance with the listing standards of Nasdaq, and as a result our common stock may be delisted, which could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity of our common stock.

•

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates.

•

We depend heavily on the success of our current product candidates, and we cannot guarantee that any of these product candidates will receive regulatory approval, which is necessary before they can be commercialized. If we, or any strategic partners we may enter into collaboration agreements with for the development and commercialization of our product candidates, are unable to commercialize our product candidates, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be materially adversely affected.

•

Our limited operating history may make it difficult for you to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.

•

Our business operations and current and future relationships with healthcare professionals, principal investigators, consultants, vendors, customers and third-party payors in the United States and elsewhere are subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, false claims, physician payment transparency, information privacy and security and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to substantial penalties.

•

The development and commercialization of biopharmaceutical products is subject to extensive regulation, and the regulatory approval processes of the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and comparable foreign authorities are lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable. If we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates on a timely basis if at all, our business will be substantially harmed.

•

We are subject to stringent and changing obligations related to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions of our business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenues or profits; increases in the costs of our products; reductions in the use or adoption of our products; and other adverse business consequences.

•

Holders of our preferred stock may have interests and rights that are different from our common stockholders.

Risks Related to the Development and Clinical Testing of Our Product Candidates

To obtain the requisite regulatory approvals to market and sell any of our product candidates, we or any collaborator for such candidates must demonstrate through extensive preclinical studies and clinical trials that our product candidates are safe and effective in humans. Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. The results of preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. Product candidates in later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical trials. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials. Our future clinical trial results may not be successful.

To date, we have not completed any clinical trials required for the approval of any of our product candidates. Although we are conducting early-stage clinical trials and are conducting preclinical studies for other product candidates, we may experience delays in our ongoing clinical trials, and we do not know whether planned clinical trials will begin on time, need to be redesigned, enroll patients on time or be completed on schedule, if at all. Clinical trials can be delayed, suspended, or terminated for a variety of reasons, including the following:

•

delays in or failure to reach agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract research organizations, or CROs and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;

•

difficulty in recruiting clinical trial investigators of appropriate competencies and experience;

•

delays in establishing the appropriate dosage levels in clinical trials;

•

delays in or failure to recruit and enroll suitable patients to participate in a trial;

•

the difficulty in certain countries in identifying the sub-populations that we are trying to treat in a particular trial, which may delay enrollment and reduce the power of a clinical trial to detect statistically significant results;

•

lower than anticipated retention rates of patients in clinical trials;

•

failure to have patients complete a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up;

•

clinical sites deviating from trial protocol or dropping out of a trial;

•

adding new clinical trial sites;

•

safety or tolerability concerns could cause us, our collaborators or governmental authorities, as applicable, to suspend or terminate a trial if it is found that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks;

•

delays in or failure to obtain regulatory approval to commence a trial;

•

delays in or failure to obtain IRB, approval at each site;

•

our third-party research contractors failing to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual obligations to us in a timely manner, or at all;

•

changes in regulatory requirements, policies and guidelines;

•

manufacturing and timely delivery of sufficient quantities of a product candidate for use in clinical trials;

•

the quality or stability of a product candidate falling below acceptable standards;

•

changes in the treatment landscape for our target indications that may make our product candidates no longer relevant;

•

third-party actions claiming infringement by our product candidates in clinical trials outside the United States and obtaining injunctions interfering with our progress; and

•

business interruptions resulting from geo-political actions, including war and terrorism, or health pandemics or epidemics, natural disasters including earthquakes, typhoons, floods and fires.

We could encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by us, by the IRBs or Ethics Committees of the institutions in which such trials are being conducted, by the Data Review Committee or Data Safety Monitoring Board for such trial or by the FDA, or other regulatory authorities. Such authorities may impose such a suspension or termination due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA or other regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial. We could also encounter delays if supplies of a product candidate are not sufficient for the needs of our clinical trials. This may, for example, occur as a result of delays from the third-party manufacturers we work with or due to changes in the design of our clinical trials.

If we experience delays in the completion of, or termination of, any clinical trial of our product candidates, the commercial prospects of our product candidates will be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenues from any of these product candidates will be delayed. In addition, any delays in completing our clinical trials will increase our costs, slow down our product candidate development and approval process and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate revenues. Significant clinical trial delays could also allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do or shorten any periods during which we have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates and impair our ability to commercialize our product candidates and may harm our business and results of operations.

Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.

Clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with the FDA and other applicable regulatory authorities’ legal requirements, regulations or guidelines, and are subject to oversight by these governmental agencies and Ethics Committees or IRBs at the medical institutions where the clinical trials are conducted. In addition, clinical trials must be conducted with supplies of our product candidates produced under cGMP requirements and other regulations. Furthermore, we rely on CROs and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials and while we have agreements governing their committed activities, we have limited influence over their actual performance. We depend on our collaborators and on medical institutions and CROs to conduct our clinical trials in compliance with good clinical practice, or GCP, requirements. To the extent our collaborators or the CROs fail to enroll participants for our clinical trials, fail to conduct the study to GCP standards or are delayed for a significant time in the execution of trials, including achieving full enrollment, we may be affected by increased costs, program delays or both, which may harm our business. In addition, clinical trials that are conducted in countries outside the United States may subject us to further delays and expenses as a result of increased shipment costs, additional regulatory requirements and the engagement of non-U.S. CROs, as well as expose us to risks associated with clinical investigators who are unknown to the FDA, and different standards of diagnosis, screening and medical care.

From time to time, we publicly disclose preliminary or topline or data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials, which is based on a preliminary analysis of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular study or trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the topline results that we report may differ from future results of the same studies, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Topline data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, topline data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. From time to time, we also disclose interim data from our clinical trials. Interim data from clinical trials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. As a result, any interim/or preliminary data should be viewed with caution until final data is available. Material adverse changes in the final data could result in significant harm to our business prospects. Adverse differences between preliminary or interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects. Further, disclosure of interim data by us or by our competitors could result in volatility in the price of our common stock.

Further, others, including regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations, conclusions or analyses or may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value of the particular program, the approvability or commercialization of the particular product candidate or product and our company in general. If the interim, topline, or preliminary data that we report differ from actual results, or if others, including regulatory authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize, our product candidates may be harmed, which could harm our business, operating results, prospects or financial condition.

We have not received regulatory approval for a TriTAC, ProTriTAC or TriTAC-XR product candidates. We cannot be certain that our approach will lead to the development of approvable or marketable products, alone or in combination with other therapies. In addition, our TriTACs, ProTriTACs and TriTAC-XRs platforms may have different effectiveness rates in various indications. Our approach involves using biologics to improve efficacy against solid tumors, which is unproven and may not be successful. Further, our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR technology could have less efficacy in tumor types with fewer T cells, such as pancreatic cancer. Finally, the FDA or other regulatory agencies may lack experience in evaluating the safety and efficacy of our TriTACs, ProTriTACs or TriTAC-XRs platforms which could result in a longer than expected regulatory review process, increase our expected development costs and delay or prevent commercialization of our product candidates.

Results of earlier preclinical studies of our product candidates may not be predictive of future trial results.

Success in preclinical studies does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful. A number of companies in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries have suffered significant setbacks in clinical trials, even after positive results in earlier preclinical studies. These setbacks have been caused by, among other things, preclinical findings made while clinical trials were underway and safety or efficacy observations made in clinical trials, including previously unreported adverse events. Notwithstanding any potential promising results in earlier studies, we have in the past and may in the future face similar setbacks. In addition, the results of our preclinical animal studies, including our non-human primate studies, may not be predictive of the results of outcomes in human clinical trials. For example, while we did not observe unacceptable safety events in our preclinical testing of HPN601, given the expression of EpCAM on both normal and cancerous cells, we may observe unacceptable levels of toxicity in our future clinical trial of HPN601. Product candidates in later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired pharmacological properties or safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through preclinical studies.

Successful and timely completion of clinical trials will require that we enroll a sufficient number of patient candidates. These trials and other trials we conduct have in the past and may in the future be subject to delays as a result of patient enrollment taking longer than anticipated, patient withdrawal or adverse events. We have ongoing Phase 1/2 clinical trials, which could generate adverse events that may cause us to delay these trials or halt further development. For example, in November 2022, we voluntarily paused enrollment into our ongoing Phase 1/2 safety study of HPN328 following two events of Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome following an initial 2mg priming dose of HPN328. Although we have resumed enrollment in the study, we cannot be certain that our mitigation efforts, including, reduction of the priming dose and a protocol amendment to exclude patients requiring supplemental oxygen

therapy, will avoid future toxicities or deaths, particularly as we escalate the target dose. Regulatory authorities, including the FDA and IRBs, may impose a clinical hold or suspend the trial, preventing further enrollment.

Our clinical trials will likely compete with other clinical trials that are in the same therapeutic areas as our product candidates, and this competition may reduce the number and types of patients available to us, because some patients who might have opted to enroll in our trials may instead opt to enroll in a trial being conducted by one of our competitors. Because the number of qualified clinical investigators and clinical trial sites is limited, we may conduct some of our clinical trials at the same clinical trial sites that some of our competitors use, which could reduce the number of patients who are available for our clinical trials at such clinical trial sites.

Patient enrollment depends on many factors, including the size and nature of the patient population, the severity of the disease under investigation, eligibility criteria for the trial, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the design of the clinical protocol, the ability to obtain and maintain patient consents, the ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience, the risk that patients enrolled in clinical trials will drop out of the trials before the administration of our product candidates or trial completion, the availability of competing clinical trials, the availability of new drugs approved for the indication the clinical trial is investigating, and clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages of the drug being studied in relation to other available therapies. These factors may make it difficult for us to enroll enough patients to complete our clinical trials in a timely and cost-effective manner. Delays in the completion of any clinical trial of our product candidates will increase our costs, slow down our product candidate development and approval process and delay or potentially jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate revenue. In addition, some of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.

Our product candidates may have serious adverse, undesirable or unacceptable side effects or other properties which may delay or prevent marketing approval. Such side effects could result in us needing to abandon the development of our product candidates, the commercial profile of any approved label may be limited, or we may be subject to other significant negative consequences following marketing approval, if any.

Undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other comparable foreign authorities. Our product candidates target protein expression on tumor cells, which expression may also be present on healthy cells. Accordingly, our product candidates can result in high or unacceptable levels of toxicity when tested in humans. Cytokine release syndrome is a common toxicity occurring with CAR-T therapies and has occurred with our product candidates. For example, in November 2022, we announced two events in our HPN328 study of Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) following an initial 2mg priming dose of HPN328 during the dose escalation portion of the study. CRS in one patient resolved with treatment. CRS in a second patient was complicated by a requirement for oxygen prior to dosing and other complications that led to an additional event of respiratory failure, which led to the patient’s death.

Results of our trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of these or other side effects. In such an event, our trials could be suspended or terminated and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could order us to cease further development of or deny approval of our product candidates for any or all targeted indications. The drug-related side effects could affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly. Additionally, if any of our product candidates receives marketing approval and we or others later identify undesirable or unacceptable side effects caused by such products, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including:

•

regulatory authorities may withdraw or limit approvals of such products and require us to take our approved product off the market;

•

regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, specific warnings, a contraindication or field alerts to physicians and pharmacies, or issue other communications containing warnings or other safety information about the product;

•

regulatory authorities may require a medication guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients, or that we implement a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, plan to ensure that the benefits of the product outweigh its risks;

•

we may be required to change the dose or the way the product is administered, conduct additional clinical trials or change the labeling of the product;

•

we may be subject to limitations on how we may promote or manufacture the product;

•

sales of the product may decrease significantly;

•

we may be subject to litigation or product liability claims; and

•

our reputation may suffer.

Any of these events could prevent us, our collaborators or our potential future partners from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the affected product or could substantially increase commercialization costs and expenses, which in turn could delay or prevent us from generating significant revenue from the sale of any products.

Monitoring safety of patients receiving our product candidates is challenging, which could adversely affect our ability to obtain regulatory approval and commercialize.

For our ongoing clinical trial and planned clinical trials, we have and expect to continue to contract with academic medical centers and hospitals experienced in the assessment and management of toxicities arising during clinical trials. Nonetheless, these centers and hospitals may have difficulty observing patients and treating toxicities, which may be more challenging due to personnel changes, inexperience, shift changes, house staff coverage or related issues. This could lead to more severe or prolonged toxicities or even patient deaths, which could result in us or the FDA delaying, suspending or terminating one or more of our clinical trials, and which could jeopardize regulatory approval. We also expect the centers using our product candidates, if approved, on a commercial basis could similarly have difficulty in managing adverse events. Medicines used at centers to help manage adverse side effects of our product candidates may not adequately control the side effects and/or may have a detrimental impact on the efficacy of the treatment. Use of these medicines may increase with new physicians and centers administering our product candidates.

We may not be successful in our efforts to use and expand our technology platforms, including TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR, to build a pipeline of product candidates.

A key element of our strategy is to use and expand our technology platforms, including TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR, to build a pipeline of product candidates and progress these product candidates through clinical development for the treatment of a variety of different types of diseases. Although our research and development efforts to date have resulted in a pipeline of product candidates directed at various cancers, we may not be able to develop product candidates that are safe and effective. Even if we are successful in continuing to build our pipeline, the potential product candidates that we identify may not be suitable for clinical development, including as a result of being shown to have harmful side effects or other characteristics that indicate that they are unlikely to be products that will receive marketing approval and achieve market acceptance. If we do not successfully develop and begin to commercialize product candidates, we will face difficulty in obtaining product revenues in future periods, which could result in significant harm to our financial position and adversely affect our share price.

Risks Related to Our Financial Condition and Need for Additional Capital

We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we conduct our ongoing clinical trials of HPN217 and HPN328, and as we continue to research and develop other potential product candidates, including HPN601. As a result, we may at times reevaluate our corporate priorities and development plans. For example, in 2022, based on our decision to prioritize certain assets in our portfolio, we announced that we terminate further develop our HPN424 and HPN536 programs and a corporate restructuring and a reduction in workforce designed to reduce discovery research and operating expenses while focusing our resources on our clinical pipeline.

In addition, if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution. Furthermore, we will continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or any future commercialization efforts.

Based on our current business plans, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our planned operations for at least the next 12 months from the date of this Quarterly Report. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, including our assumptions related to our corporate restructuring, and we could use our capital resources sooner than we currently expect, requiring us to seek additional funds sooner than planned, through public or private equity or debt financing or other sources, such as strategic collaborations. Such financing, including our March 2023 private

placement transaction, or the Private Placement, or pursuant to our Sales Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald, may result in dilution to our stockholders, the imposition of burdensome covenants and repayment obligations, and other restrictions that may affect our business. For example, in March 2023, we raised $25.0 million through a Private Placement pursuant to which we sold 25,000 shares of preferred stock, or the Series A Preferred Stock with rights that are superior to those of our common stockholders and warrants to purchase up to 7,485,762 shares of our common stock (the "Warrants"). If we raise additional funds through licensing or collaboration arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. In addition, pursuant to the terms of our Series A Preferred Stock, we will be required to use a portion of the net proceeds from certain licensing or collaboration arrangements to redeem shares of Series A Preferred Stock, and, accordingly, we may require additional capital to fund our operating plans. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. Attempting to secure additional financing may divert our management from our day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop our product candidates. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

•

the scope, progress, results and costs of developing our product candidates, and conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, including our Phase 1 trial of HPN217, Phase 1/2 trial of HPN328, the future Phase 1 trial of HPN601 and the winddown of our Phase 1/2a trials of HPN536 and HPN424;

•

the costs, timing and outcome of regulatory review of any of our product candidates;

•

the cost of manufacturing clinical supplies of our product candidates;

•

the scope, progress, results and costs of preclinical development, laboratory testing and clinical trials for our product candidates;

•

the costs and timing of future commercialization activities, including manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution, for any of our product candidates for which we receive marketing approval;

•

the timing and amount of any milestone, royalty or other payments we are required to make pursuant to any current or future collaboration or license agreements;

•

the progress of our collaborations with AbbVie to develop product candidates;

•

the costs and timing of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights and defending any intellectual property-related claims, including any claims by third parties that we are infringing upon their intellectual property rights;

•

our ability to maintain existing, and establish new, strategic collaborations, licensing or other arrangements (including a partnership arrangement for the development of our HPN536 program) and the financial terms of any such agreements, including the timing and amount of any future milestone, royalty or other payments due under any such agreement;

•

the cost of building a sales force in anticipation of product commercialization;

•

the revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of our product candidates for which we receive marketing approval;

•

the effect of competing technological and market developments; and

•

the extent to which we acquire or invest in business, products and technologies, including our collaboration with AbbVie and any other licensing or collaboration arrangements for any of our product candidates.

Further decline in the market price of our common stock could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate, including the ability to raise additional equity as one way to regain compliance with the Nasdaq stockholders' equity listing requirement. See the risk factor titled “We currently do not meet, and may not regain compliance with the listing standards of Nasdaq, and as a result our common stock may be delisted, which could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity of our common stock” below. Additional funds may not be available when we need them, on terms that are acceptable to us or at all. If adequate funds are not available to us on a timely basis, we could be required to:

•

delay, limit, reduce or terminate preclinical studies, clinical trials or other research and development activities or eliminate one or more of our development programs altogether; or

•

further reduce staff, delay, limit, reduce or terminate our efforts to access manufacturing capacity, establish sales and marketing capabilities or other activities that may be necessary to commercialize our product candidates, or reduce our flexibility in developing or maintaining our sales and marketing strategy.

In addition, while using a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 to raise additional capital generally takes less time and is less expensive than other means, such as conducting an offering under a Form S-1 registration statement, our ability to raise capital using a shelf registration statement may be limited by, among other things, SEC rules and regulations. Under SEC rules and regulations, if our public float (the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates) is less than $75.0 million, then the aggregate market value of securities sold by us or on our behalf under our Form S-3 in any 12-month period is limited to an aggregate of one-third of our

public float. As our public float is currently less than $75.0 million, we are currently subject to this limitation. We may conduct offerings pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act or under a Form S-1 registration statement while we are subject to this limitation, but we would expect such alternatives to increase the cost of raising additional capital relative to utilizing a Form S-3 registration statement.

Any of these impacts could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing when needed, we expect to have to delay, reduce the scope of or suspend one or more of our preclinical studies and clinical trials, research and development programs or commercialization efforts. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development and commercialization of our product candidates and the extent to which we may enter into additional collaborations with third parties to participate in their development and commercialization, we are unable to estimate the amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenditures associated with our current and anticipated preclinical studies and clinical trials. To the extent that we raise additional capital through additional collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our product candidates, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us.

We are an early clinical-stage company and have incurred significant losses since our inception. We expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.

We are an early clinical-stage immunotherapy company with a limited operating history. We incurred net losses attributable to common stockholders of $10.3 million and $37.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As of June 30, 2023, we had an accumulated deficit of $362.8 million. Our losses have resulted principally from expenses incurred in research and development of our product candidates and from management and administrative costs and other expenses that we have incurred while building our business infrastructure. We expect to continue to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future as we continue our research and development efforts and seek to obtain regulatory approval and commercialization of our product candidates. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially as we:

•

continue to conduct our ongoing Phase 1 trial of HPN217 for the treatment of relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma;

•

continue to conduct our ongoing Phase 1/2 trial of HPN328 for the treatment of small cell lung cancer and other DLL3 expressing tumors;

•

plan for the startup of the Phase 1 study of HPN601 for the treatment of EpCAM expressing tumors;

•

continue the development of our product candidates beyond Phase 1 trials;

•

continue the research and preclinical development of our other product candidates;

•

apply for regulatory approvals for any product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials;

•

potentially establish a manufacturing, sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure to produce and commercialize any products for which we may obtain regulatory approvals;

•

maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio;

•

add clinical, scientific, operational, financial and management information systems and personnel, including personnel to support our product development, potential future commercialization efforts and operations as a public company; and

•

experience any delays or encounter any issues with any of the above, including but not limited to failed studies, complex results, manufacturing challenges, safety issues or other regulatory challenges.

We have financed our operations to date primarily through payments received under collaboration and licensing agreements and the sale of capital stock, including cash proceeds from our March 2023 Private Placement of Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants, our 2021 follow on common stock offering and sales pursuant to our Sales Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald. We have devoted a significant portion of our financial resources and efforts to developing our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms, identifying potential product candidates, conducting preclinical studies of a variety of product candidates, and preparing for and conducting clinical trials of product candidates. We are in the early stages of development of our product candidates, and we have not completed development and commercialization of any TriTAC, ProTriTAC or TriTAC-XR product candidate.

To become and remain profitable, we must succeed in developing and eventually commercializing products that generate significant revenue. This will require us to be successful in a range of challenging activities, including completing preclinical testing and clinical trials of our product candidates, discovering and developing additional product candidates, obtaining regulatory approval for any product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials, accessing manufacturing capacity, establishing marketing capabilities and ultimately selling any products for which we may obtain regulatory approval. We are only in the preliminary stages of most of these activities. We may never succeed in these activities and, even if we do, may never generate revenue that is significant enough to achieve profitability.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with pharmaceutical products and biological development, we are unable to accurately predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when, or if, we will be able to achieve profitability. If we are required by the FDA or other regulatory authorities to perform studies in addition to those we currently anticipate, or if there are any delays in completing our clinical trials or the development of any of our product candidates, our expenses could increase and commercial revenue could be further delayed and more uncertain.

Even if we do generate product sales or royalties, we may never achieve or sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to sustain profitability would depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, diversify our product offerings and continue our operations.

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through equity or debt financings and upfront and milestone payments, if any, received under our collaborations with AbbVie and any other future licenses or collaborations, together with our existing cash and cash equivalents. In order to accomplish our business objectives and further develop our product pipeline, we will, however, need to seek additional funds. If we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a holder of our common stock. For example, in March 2023, we raised $25.0 million in a Private Placement where we sold 25,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock with rights that are superior to those of our common stockholders and warrants to purchase up to 7,485,762 shares of our common stock; in the event of our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or the occurrence of a Deemed Liquidation Event (as defined in our certificate of designation), holders of our Series A Preferred Stock then outstanding are entitled to be paid prior to common stock holders. In addition, the possibility of additional issuances may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. Debt financing, if available, may result in increased fixed payment obligations and involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, declaring dividends or acquiring, selling or licensing intellectual property rights, which could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our intellectual property, technologies, future revenue streams or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. We could also be required to seek funds through arrangements with collaborators or others at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable. Any of these occurrences may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and prospects.

We have invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the development of our current product candidates. Our ability to generate product and royalty revenues, which we do not expect will occur for at least the next several years, if ever, will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of these product candidates, which may never occur. We currently generate no revenues from sales of any products, and we may never be able to develop or commercialize a marketable product. Each of our product candidates will require significant clinical development, management of clinical, preclinical and manufacturing activities, regulatory approval in multiple jurisdictions, obtaining manufacturing supply, including commercial manufacturing supply, as well as requiring us to build a commercial organization, and make substantial investment and significant marketing efforts before we generate any revenues from product sales. We are not permitted to market or promote any of our product candidates before we receive regulatory approval from the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, and we may never receive such regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. The success of our product candidates will depend on several factors, including the following:

•

for product candidates which we may license to others, the successful efforts of those parties in completing clinical trials of, receipt of regulatory approval for and commercialization of such product candidates;

•

for product candidates to which we retain rights, completion of preclinical studies and clinical trials of, receipt of marketing approvals for, establishment of commercial manufacturing supplies of and successful commercialization of such product candidates; and

•

for all of our product candidates, if and when approved, acceptance of such product candidates by patients, the medical community and third-party payors, effectively competing with other therapies, a continued acceptable safety profile following approval and qualifying for, maintaining, enforcing and defending our intellectual property rights and claims.

If we do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have not previously submitted a Biologics License Application, or BLA, to the FDA or similar regulatory approval filings to comparable foreign authorities, for any product candidate, and we cannot be certain that any of our product candidates will be successful in clinical trials or receive regulatory approval. Further, our product candidates may not receive regulatory approval even if they are successful in clinical trials. If we do not receive regulatory approvals for our product candidates, we may not be able to continue our operations. Even if we successfully obtain regulatory approvals to market one or more of our product candidates, our revenues will be dependent, in part, upon the size of the markets in the territories for which we gain regulatory approval and have commercial rights. If the markets for patient subsets that we are targeting are not as significant as we estimate, we may not generate significant revenues from sales of such products, if approved.

We plan to seek regulatory approval to commercialize our product candidates in the United States and, potentially, in other countries. While the scope of regulatory approval is similar in other countries, to obtain separate regulatory approval in many other countries we must comply with the numerous and varying regulatory requirements of such countries regarding safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials and commercial sales, pricing and distribution of our product candidates, and we cannot predict success in these jurisdictions.

Our limited operating history may make it difficult for you to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.

Since commencing operations in 2015, we have devoted a significant portion of our resources to developing our product candidates, our other research and development efforts, building our intellectual property portfolio, raising capital and providing general and administrative support for these operations. While we have ongoing early-stage clinical trials, we have not completed any clinical trials for any product candidate. We have not yet demonstrated our ability to successfully complete any clinical trials (including any Phase 3 or other pivotal clinical trials), obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial scale product or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Additionally, we expect our financial condition and operating results to continue to fluctuate significantly from period to period due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Consequently, any predictions you make about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history.

Risks Related to Our Regulatory Environment

Healthcare providers, healthcare facilities and institutions, and third-party payors in the United States and elsewhere will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our current and future arrangements with healthcare professionals, healthcare facilities and institutions, principal investigators, consultants, customers and third-party payors may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the federal False Claims Act, that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we sell, market and distribute any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. In addition, we may be subject to physician payment transparency laws and patient privacy and security regulation by the federal government and by the states and foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. The applicable federal, state and foreign healthcare laws that affect our ability to operate include, but are not limited to, the following:

•

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or certain rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, lease, order or recommendation of, any good, facility, item or service, for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under any U.S. federal healthcare program, such as Medicare and Medicaid. The term “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including stock options. The federal Anti-Kickback Statute has also been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand and prescribers, purchasers and formulary managers on the other hand. Any arrangements with prescribers must be for bona fide services and compensated at fair market value. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;

•

the U.S. federal civil and criminal false claims, including the False Claims Act, which prohibit, among other things, including through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, and civil monetary penalties laws, including the civil False Claims Act, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the U.S. federal government, claims for payment or approval that are false or fraudulent, knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim, or from knowingly making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the U.S. federal government. Pharmaceutical manufacturers can cause false claims to be presented to the U.S. federal government by, among other

things, engaging in impermissible marketing practices, such as the off-label promotion of a product for an indication for which it has not received FDA approval. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items and services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the civil False Claims Act;

•

the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which imposes criminal and civil liability for, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement, in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services. Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the healthcare fraud statute implemented under HIPAA or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;

•

HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, and their respective implementing regulations, which also imposes certain obligations, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy and security of individually identifiable health information of covered entities subject to the rule, such as health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and certain healthcare providers as well as their business associates, and their covered subcontractors that perform certain services involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information on their behalf;

•

the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which prohibits, among other things, the adulteration or misbranding of drugs, biologics and medical devices;

•

the U.S. Public Health Service Act, which prohibits, among other things, the introduction into interstate commerce of a biological product unless a biologics license is in effect for that product;

•

the U.S. Physician Payments Sunshine Act and its implementing regulations, which requires, among other things, certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with specific exceptions, to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, information related to certain payments and other transfers of value to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists, and chiropractors), certain other healthcare professionals (such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners) and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members;

•

analogous U.S. state, foreign and local laws and regulations, including: state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to our business practices, including but not limited to, research, distribution, sales and marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including private insurers; state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the U.S. federal government, or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; state laws and regulations that require drug manufacturers to file reports relating to pricing and marketing information, which requires tracking gifts and other remuneration and items of value provided to healthcare professionals and entities; state, foreign and local laws requiring the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives; and state and foreign laws governing the privacy and security of personal information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts; and

•

similar healthcare laws and regulations in foreign jurisdictions, including reporting requirements detailing interactions with and payments to healthcare providers.

We may also be subject to federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that could potentially harm consumers.

Ensuring that our internal operations and future business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct or business noncompliance, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent inappropriate conduct may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements will comply with applicable healthcare, privacy and information security laws may involve substantial costs. We have entered into consulting and scientific advisory board arrangements with physicians and other healthcare providers, including some who could influence the use of our product candidates, if approved. Compensation under some of these arrangements includes the provision of stock or stock options in addition to cash consideration. Because of the complex and far-reaching nature of these laws, it is possible that governmental authorities could conclude that our payments to physicians may not be fair market value for bona fide services or that our business practices do not comply with current or future statutes, regulations, agency guidance or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other

governmental laws and regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant penalties, including civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from government-funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid or similar programs in other countries or jurisdictions, integrity oversight and reporting obligations to resolve allegations of non-compliance, disgorgement, imprisonment, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any of the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we expect to do business are found to not be in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare programs and imprisonment, which could affect our ability to operate our business. Further, defending against any such actions can be costly, time-consuming and may require significant personnel resources. Therefore, even if we are successful in defending against any such actions that may be brought against us, our business may be impaired.

The development and commercialization of biopharmaceutical products is subject to extensive regulation, and the regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign authorities are lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable. If we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates on a timely basis if at all, our business will be substantially harmed.

The clinical development, manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, advertising, promotion, export, import, marketing, distribution, adverse event reporting, including the submission of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, and other possible activities relating to our product candidates are subject to extensive regulation. In the United States, marketing approval of biologics requires the submission of a BLA to the FDA, and we are not permitted to market any product candidate in the United States until we obtain approval from the FDA of the BLA for that product. A BLA must be supported by extensive clinical and preclinical data, as well as extensive information regarding pharmacology, chemistry, manufacturing and controls. Outside the United States, many comparable foreign regulatory authorities employ similar approval processes.

FDA approval is not guaranteed, and the time required to obtain approval by the FDA and comparable foreign authorities is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities. In addition, approval policies, regulations, or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions. We have not obtained regulatory approval for any product candidate and it is possible that none of our existing product candidates or any product candidates we may seek to develop in the future will ever obtain regulatory approval.

Any clinical trial could fail to produce results satisfactory to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities for a number of reasons, including the following:

•

the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with the design or implementation of our clinical trials;

•

we may be unable to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities that a product candidate is safe and effective for its proposed indication;

•

the results of clinical trials may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities for approval;

•

we may be unable to demonstrate that a product candidate’s clinical and other benefits outweigh its safety risks;

•

the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials;

•

the data collected from clinical trials of our product candidates may not be sufficient to support the submission of a BLA or other submission or to obtain regulatory approval in the United States or elsewhere, or regulatory authorities may not accept a submission due to, among other reasons, the content or formatting of the submission;

•

the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may fail to approve the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with which we contract for clinical and commercial supplies;

•

the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may fail to approve the companion diagnostics we contemplate developing with collaborators; and

•

the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval.

In addition, the FDA also has substantial discretion in the approval process and may decide that our data is insufficient for approval or insufficient to proceed to a pivotal clinical trial, and the FDA may require additional preclinical, clinical or other studies. Furthermore, we may encounter delays or rejections based upon changes in policy, which could cause delays in the clinical development of any of our product candidates. For example, the FDA launched Project Optimus in 2021 as an initiative to reform the dose optimization and dose selection paradigm in oncology drug development. Project Optimus was driven by the FDA’s concerns

that the current paradigm for dose selection may result in doses and schedules of molecularly targeted therapies that are inadequately characterized before initiating pivotal trials. In support of this initiative, the FDA may request sponsors of oncology product candidates to conduct dose optimization studies or may request other data or studies pre- or post-approval. The FDA also continues to develop and finalize guidance documents and implement initiatives regarding the development and clinical research of oncology product candidates. If the FDA does not believe we have sufficiently demonstrated that the selected doses for our product candidates maximize, not only the efficacy of the product candidate, but the safety and tolerability as well, our ability to complete existing trials or initiate new trials may be delayed. Even if we conduct any additional studies or generate any additional information requested by the FDA, the FDA could disagree that we have satisfied their requirements, all of which will cause significant delays and expense to our programs.

Moreover, regulatory authorities in various jurisdictions have in the past had, and may in the future have, differing requirements for, interpretations of and opinions on our preclinical and clinical data. As a result, we may be required to conduct additional preclinical studies, alter our proposed clinical trial designs or conduct additional clinical trials to satisfy the regulatory authorities in each of the jurisdictions in which we hope to conduct clinical trials and develop and market our products, if approved. Further, even if we believe the data collected from clinical trials of our product candidates are promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA or any other regulatory authority. Any of these factors, as well as the unpredictability of future clinical trial results, may result in our failing to obtain regulatory approval to market any of our product candidates, which would significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, even if we were to obtain approval, regulatory authorities may approve any of our product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request, may not approve the price we intend to charge for our products, may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate. Any of the foregoing scenarios could materially harm the commercial prospects for our product candidates.

Even if our product candidates obtain regulatory approval, we will be subject to ongoing obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense. Additionally, our product candidates, if approved, could be subject to labeling and other restrictions and market withdrawal and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or experience unanticipated problems with our products.

If the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority approves any of our product candidates, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, import, export, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion and recordkeeping for the product will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as continued compliance with cGMPs and GCPs for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval, all of which may result in significant expense and limit our ability to commercialize such products. In addition, any regulatory approvals that we receive for our product candidates may also be subject to limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 clinical trials, and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate.

Manufacturers and manufacturers’ facilities are required to comply with extensive FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authority requirements, including ensuring that quality control and manufacturing procedures conform to cGMP regulations. As such, we and our contract manufacturers will be subject to continual review and inspections to assess compliance with cGMP and adherence to commitments made in any approved marketing application. Accordingly, we and others with whom we work must continue to expend time, money, and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including manufacturing, production, and quality control.

If there are changes in the application of legislation or regulatory policies, or if problems are discovered with a product or our manufacture of a product, or if we or one of our distributors, licensees or co-marketers fails to comply with regulatory requirements, the regulators could take various actions. These include imposing fines on us, imposing restrictions on the product or its manufacture and requiring us to recall or remove the product from the market. The regulators could also suspend or withdraw our marketing authorizations, requiring us to conduct additional clinical trials, change our product labeling or submit additional applications for marketing authorization. If any of these events occurs, our ability to sell such product may be impaired, and we may incur substantial additional expense to comply with regulatory requirements, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, if we have any product candidate approved, our product labeling, advertising and promotion will be subject to regulatory requirements and continuing regulatory review. The FDA strictly regulates the promotional claims that may be made about pharmaceutical products. In particular, a product may not be promoted for uses that are not approved by the FDA as reflected in the product’s approved labeling. If we receive marketing approval for a product candidate, physicians may nevertheless prescribe it to their patients in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved label based on the physician's independent medical judgement. If we are found to have promoted such off-label uses, we may become subject to significant liability. The FDA and other agencies actively

enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant sanctions. The federal government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion and has enjoined several companies from engaging in off-label promotion. The FDA has also requested that companies enter into consent decrees or permanent injunctions under which specified promotional conduct is changed or curtailed.

If a regulatory agency discovers previously unknown problems with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the product is manufactured, or disagrees with the promotion, marketing or labeling of a product, such regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that product or us, including requiring withdrawal of the product from the market. If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory agency or enforcement authority may, among other things:

•

issue warning letters;

•

impose civil or criminal penalties;

•

suspend or withdraw regulatory approval;

•

suspend any of our preclinical studies and clinical trials;

•

refuse to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications submitted by us;

•

impose restrictions on our operations, including closing our contract manufacturers’ facilities; or

•

seize or detain products or require a product recall.

Any government investigation of alleged violations of law could require us to expend significant time and resources in response and could generate negative publicity. Any failure to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements may significantly and adversely affect our ability to commercialize and generate revenue from our products, if approved. If regulatory sanctions are applied or if regulatory approval is withdrawn, the value of our company and our operating results will be adversely affected.

Moreover, the policies of the FDA and of other regulatory authorities may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or executive action, either in the United States or abroad. Previously, the prior presidential administration took several executive actions, including the issuance of a number of Executive Orders, that could impose significant burdens on, or otherwise materially delay, the FDA’s ability to engage in routine oversight activities such as implementing statutes through rulemaking, issuance of guidance, and review and approval of marketing applications. It is difficult to predict whether or how these orders will be implemented, or rather rescinded or replaced under the Biden Administration. The policies and priorities of a new administration are unknown and could materially impact the regulation of our product candidates. In addition, if we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.

We may pursue the development of our product candidates in combination with other approved therapeutics. If the FDA revokes approval of any such therapeutic, or if safety, efficacy, manufacturing or supply issues arise with any therapeutic that we use in combination with one of our product candidates in the future, we may be unable to further develop and/or market our product candidate or we may experience significant regulatory delays or supply shortages, and our business could be materially harmed.

We may pursue the development of our product candidates in combination with other approved therapeutics, and we may commence clinical trials of our product candidates in combination with other approved therapeutics, in the future. In such a case, we will not have developed or obtained regulatory approval for, nor will we manufacture or sell, any of these approved therapeutics. In addition, the combinations will likely not have been previously tested and may, among other things, fail to demonstrate synergistic activity, may fail to achieve superior outcomes relative to the use of single agents or other combination therapies, may exacerbate adverse events associated with one of our product candidates when used as monotherapy or may fail to demonstrate sufficient safety or efficacy traits in clinical trials to enable us to complete those clinical trials or obtain marketing approval for the combination therapy.

If the FDA revokes its approval of any combination therapeutic, we would not be able to continue clinical development of or market any product candidate in combination with such revoked therapeutic. If safety or efficacy issues were to arise with therapeutics that we seek to combine with, we could experience significant regulatory delays, and the FDA could require us to redesign or terminate the applicable clinical trials. In addition, we may need, for supply, data referencing or other purposes, to collaborate or otherwise engage with the companies who market these approved therapeutics. If we are unable to do so on a timely basis, on

acceptable terms or at all, we may have to curtail the development of a product candidate or indication, reduce or delay its development program, delay its potential commercialization or reduce the scope of any sales or marketing activities.

Because we are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we may become exposed to liability and substantial expenses in connection with environmental compliance or remediation activities which may adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Our operations, including our research, development, testing and manufacturing activities, are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These laws and regulations govern, among other things, the controlled use, handling, release and disposal of, and the maintenance of a registry for, hazardous materials and biological materials, such as chemical solvents, human cells, carcinogenic compounds, mutagenic compounds and compounds that have a toxic effect on reproduction, laboratory procedures and exposure to blood-borne pathogens. If we fail to comply with such laws and regulations, we could be subject to fines or other sanctions. Although we believe our procedures for using, handling, storing and disposing of these materials comply with legally prescribed standards, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury resulting from hazardous and biological materials. As a result of any such contamination or injury, we may incur liability or local, city, state or federal authorities may curtail the use of these materials and interrupt our business operations. In the event of an accident, we could be held liable for damages or penalized with fines, and the liability could exceed our resources.

As with other companies engaged in activities similar to ours, we face a risk of environmental liability inherent in our current and historical activities, including liability relating to releases of or exposure to hazardous or biological materials. Environmental, health and safety laws and regulations are becoming more stringent. We may be required to incur substantial expenses in connection with future environmental compliance or remediation activities, in which case, our production and development efforts may be interrupted or delayed and our financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Our employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, consultants, commercial partners and vendors may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including non-compliance with regulatory standards and requirements.

We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by employees could include intentional failures to comply with FDA regulations, provide accurate information to the FDA, comply with manufacturing standards we may establish, comply with federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, report financial information or data accurately or disclose unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, including the imposition of significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, individual imprisonment, disgorgement of profits, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, additional reporting or oversight obligations if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with the law and curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and pursue our strategy.

Current and future legislation may increase the difficulty and cost for us and any future collaborators to obtain marketing approval of and commercialize our product candidates and affect the prices we, or they, may obtain.

In the United States and other jurisdictions, there have been, and we expect there will continue to be, a number of legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes to the healthcare system that could affect our future results of operations. In particular, there have been and continue to be a number of initiatives at the U.S. federal and state levels that seek to reduce healthcare costs and improve the quality of healthcare. For example, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively the ACA, was enacted, which substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private payors.

There have been executive, judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. For example, on June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that argued the ACA is unconstitutional in its entirety because the individual mandate was repealed by Congress. In addition, there have been a number of health reform initiatives by the Biden administration that have impacted the ACA. For example, on August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of

2022, or IRA, into law, which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the "donut hole" under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost and creating a new manufacturer discount program. It is possible that the ACA will be subject to judicial or Congressional challenges in the future. It is unclear how any such challenges, and the healthcare reform measures of the Biden administration will impact the ACA and our business.

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was enacted. For example, in August 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, led to aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year and will remain in effect until 2032, unless additional action is taken by Congress.

Moreover, payment methodologies may be subject to changes in healthcare legislation and regulatory initiatives. In addition, recently there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which has resulted in several U.S. Presidential executive orders, Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs under government payor programs, and review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs. In July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive order, on September 9, 2021, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue as well as potential administrative actions HHS can take to advance these principles. In addition, the IRA, among other things, directs HHS to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs and biologics covered under Medicare and imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. These provisions will take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023, although they may be subject to legal challenges. HHS has and will continue to issue and update guidance as these programs are implemented. It is currently unclear how the IRA will be implemented but is likely to have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry. Further, in response to the Biden administration’s October 2022 executive order, on February 14, 2023, HHS released a report outlining three new models for testing by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Innovation Center which will be evaluated on their ability to lower the cost of drugs, promote accessibility, and improve quality of care. It is unclear whether the models will be utilized in any health reform measures in the future. We expect that additional U.S. federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that the U.S. federal government will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our product candidates or additional pricing pressures.

Individual states in the United States have also increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could reduce the ultimate demand for our product candidates or put pressure on our product pricing.

In the European Union, pricing and reimbursement schemes vary widely from country to country. Some countries may require the completion of additional studies that compare the cost effectiveness of a particular drug candidate to currently available therapies. This Health Technology Assessment, or HTA process, which is currently governed by the national laws of the individual EU Member States, is the procedure according to which the assessment of the public health impact, therapeutic impact and the economic and societal impact of use of a given medicinal product in the national healthcare systems of the individual country is conducted. The outcome of HTA regarding specific medicinal products will often influence the pricing and reimbursement status granted to these medicinal products by the competent authorities of individual EU Member States. In December 2021 the HTA Regulation, which is intended to boost cooperation among EU Member States in assessing health technologies, including new medicinal products, and providing the basis for cooperation at EU level for joint clinical assessments in these areas. was adopted and entered into force on January 11, 2022. It will apply from 2025.

We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or

administrative action in the United States or any other jurisdiction. If we or any third parties we may engage are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we or such third parties are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, our product candidates may lose any regulatory approval that may have been obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.

Even if we are able to commercialize any product candidate, coverage and adequate reimbursement may not be available or such product candidate may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations or third-party coverage and reimbursement policies, which would harm our business.

The regulations that govern regulatory approvals, pricing and reimbursement for drugs products vary widely from country to country. Some countries require approval of the sale price of a drug product before it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins after marketing approval is granted. In some foreign markets, prescription drug product pricing remains subject to continuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. As a result, we might obtain regulatory approval for a

product in a particular country, but then be subject to price regulations that delay our commercial launch of the product, possibly for lengthy time periods and negatively impact the revenues we are able to generate from the sale of the product in that country. Adverse pricing limitations may hinder our ability to recoup our investment in one or more product candidates, even if our product candidates obtain regulatory approval.

Our ability to commercialize any products successfully also will depend in part on the extent to which coverage and adequate reimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available from third party payors, such as government authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Even if we succeed in bringing one or more products to the market, these products may not be considered cost-effective, and the amount reimbursed for any products may be insufficient to allow us to sell our products on a competitive basis. Because our programs are in the early stages of development, we are unable at this time to determine their cost effectiveness or the likely level or method of coverage and reimbursement. Increasingly, the third-party payors who reimburse patients or healthcare providers are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are seeking to reduce the prices charged or the amounts reimbursed for drug products. If the price we are able to charge for any products we develop, or the coverage and reimbursement provided for such products, is inadequate in light of our development and other costs, our return on investment could be affected adversely.

There may be significant delays in obtaining reimbursement for newly approved drug products, and coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which the drug product is approved by the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities. Moreover, eligibility for reimbursement does not imply that any drugs product will be reimbursed in all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including research, development, manufacture, sale and distribution.

Interim reimbursement levels for new drug products, if applicable, may also be insufficient to cover our costs and may not be made permanent. Reimbursement rates may be based on payments allowed for lower cost drug products that are already reimbursed, may be incorporated into existing payments for other services and may reflect budgetary constraints or imperfections in Medicare data. Net prices for drug products may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by third party payors and by any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of drug products from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the United States. Obtaining coverage and adequate reimbursement for our product candidates may be particularly difficult because of the higher prices often associated with drugs administered under the supervision of a physician. Similarly, because our product candidates are physician-administered injectables, separate reimbursement for the product itself may or may not be available. Instead, the administering physician may or may not be reimbursed for providing the treatment or procedure in which our product is used.

Further, no uniform policy for coverage and reimbursement exists in the United States, and coverage and reimbursement can differ significantly from payor to payor. Third-party payors often rely upon Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates, but also have their own methods and approval process apart from Medicare determinations. As a result, the coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our product candidates to each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance. Decisions regarding the extent of coverage and amount of reimbursement to be provided for any product candidates that we develop will be made on a payor-by-payor basis. One payor’s determination to provide coverage for a drug does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage and adequate reimbursement for the drug. Additionally, a third-party payor’s decision to provide coverage for a therapy does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved.

Additionally, we may develop companion diagnostic tests for use with our product candidates. We, or our collaborators, will be required to obtain coverage and reimbursement for these tests separate and apart from the coverage and reimbursement we seek for our product candidates, once approved. While we have not yet developed any companion diagnostic test for our product candidates, if we do, there is significant uncertainty regarding our ability to obtain coverage and adequate reimbursement for the same reasons applicable to our product candidates.

Our inability to promptly obtain coverage and adequate reimbursement from both third-party payors for the product candidates and companion diagnostic tests that we develop and for which we obtain regulatory approval could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies caused by funding shortages or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire, retain or deploy key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise prevent new or modified products from being developed, or approved or commercialized in a timely manner or at all, which could negatively impact our business.

The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, statutory, regulatory, and policy changes, the FDA’s ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s ability to perform routine functions. Average review times

at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new biologics to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, including for 35 days beginning on December 22, 2018, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to furlough critical FDA employees and stop critical activities

In the ordinary course of business, we collect, receive, store, process, generate, use, transfer, disclose, make accessible, protect, secure, dispose of, transmit, and share (collectively, process) personal information and other sensitive information, including proprietary and confidential business information, trade secrets, intellectual property, and data we collect about clinical trial participants in connection with clinical trials. As a result, we, our service providers and any collaborators are or may become subject to or affected by numerous data privacy and security obligations, such as various laws, regulations, guidance, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, contracts, certifications, and other obligations that govern the processing of personal information by us or on our behalf. These obligations are rapidly evolving, subject to differing interpretations and could result in conflicting compliance obligations among various jurisdictions. Compliance with federal, state, and foreign data protection laws and regulations and other data protection obligations could require us to take on more onerous obligations in our contracts; increase our costs of legal compliance; restrict our ability to collect, use and disclose personal information; and, in some cases, impact our, our service providers’ or collaborators’ ability to operate in certain jurisdictions.

In the United States, numerous federal, state, and local governments have enacted numerous data privacy and security laws, including personal information privacy laws (including those related to health), data breach notification laws, and state consumer protection laws. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, or the CCPA, imposes obligations on businesses to which it applies, including, but not limited to, requirements to provide specific disclosures in privacy notices and affording California residents certain rights related to their personal information. Although the CCPA exempts some data processed in the context of clinical trials, the CCPA, to the extent applicable to our business and operations, may increase our compliance costs and potential liability with respect to other personal information we maintain about California residents. The CCPA allows for statutory fines for noncompliance (up to $7,500 per violation). In addition, the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020, or the CPRA, expands the CCPA’s requirements, including by adding a new right for individuals to correct their personal information and establishing a new regulatory agency to implement and enforce the law. Other states (such as Colorado, Utah, Connecticut and Virginia) have also passed comprehensive data privacy laws.

Outside the United States, there are an increasing number of laws, regulations, and industry standards related to data privacy and security with which we, our collaborators, service providers (including our CROs, and contractors) may need to comply, including in connection with our clinical trial activities. For example, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, and the United Kingdom’s GDPR, or UK GDPR, include strict requirements for processing the personal information of individuals (including clinical trial data), respectively, located within the European Economic Area, or EEA, and the United Kingdom, or UK. The processing of sensitive personal information, such as health information, may impose heightened compliance burdens under the GDPR and the UK GDPR. For example, under the GDPR, government regulators may impose temporary and definitive bans on personal information processing as well as fines of up to 20 million Euros or 4% of annual global revenue, whichever is greater.

Certain jurisdictions have enacted data localization laws and cross-border personal information transfer laws, which could make it more difficult for us to transfer personal information across jurisdictions (such as transferring or receiving personal information that originates in the EU or UK). Existing mechanisms that facilitate cross-border personal information transfers may change or be invalidated. Inability to import personal information from Europe or elsewhere to the United States may limit our ability to conduct clinical trials activities in Europe or elsewhere, limit our ability to collaborate with CROs, service providers, contractors and others, and require us to increase our data processing capabilities in Europe or elsewhere at significant expense.

Our obligations related to data privacy and security are quickly changing in an increasingly frequent fashion. Additionally, these obligations may be subject to differing applications and interpretations, which may be inconsistent or in conflict among jurisdictions. Preparation for and compliance with these obligations requires us to devote significant resources (including, without limitation, financial and time-related resources). These obligations may necessitate changes to our information technologies, systems, and practices, and to any third parties that process personal information on our behalf. Although we endeavor to comply with all applicable data privacy and security obligations, we may at times fail (or be perceived to have failed) to do so. Moreover, despite our efforts, our personnel or third parties upon whom we rely may fail to comply with such obligations. If we or our third-party collaborators or

service providers fail, or are perceived to have failed, to address or comply with data privacy and security obligations, we could face significant consequences. These consequences may include, but are not limited to, government enforcement actions (e.g., investigations, fines, penalties, audits, inspections, and similar); litigation (including class-related claims); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; reputational harm; bans on processing personal information; orders to destroy or not use personal information; and imprisonment of company officials. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and financial condition, including, but not limited to interruptions or stoppages in business operations (including, clinical trials); inability to process personal information; limited ability to develop or commercialize or products; expenditure of time and resources to defend any claim, inquiry or similar request; adverse publicity; and revision or restructuring of our operations.

Risks Related to Our Business Operations

Our 2022 corporate restructuring undertaken to reduce our operating expenses, focus our resources on our clinical pipeline and extend our cash runway may not be successful.

In November 2022, we announced a corporate restructuring designed to reduce operating expenses and focus our resources on our clinical pipeline. In connection with the restructuring plan, our workforce was reduced by approximately 45%, with the reductions completed in June 2023. In June 2023, we also completed activities to reduce our corporate facilities footprint by subletting all of our office and laboratory space in South San Francisco, California pursuant to our August 2018 lease, or the Cove Lease, and relocated to offices at our Gateway Lease.

These restructuring activities may yield unintended consequences and costs, such as the loss of institutional knowledge and expertise, attrition beyond our intended reduction-in-force, a reduction in morale among our remaining employees, and the risk that we may not achieve the anticipated benefits, all of which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. In addition, while positions have been eliminated, certain functions necessary to our reduced operations remain, and we may be unsuccessful in distributing the duties and obligations of departed employees among our remaining employees. We may also discover that the reductions in workforce and cost cutting measures will make it difficult for us to pursue new opportunities, hire new employees, complete initiatives and require us to hire qualified replacement personnel, which may result in us incurring additional and unanticipated costs and expenses. Our failure to successfully accomplish any of the above activities and goals may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to successfully develop our focused clinical programs.

Manufacturing our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR product candidates is complex. We and our third-party manufacturers may encounter difficulties in production. If we encounter any such difficulties, our ability to supply our product candidates for clinical trials or, if approved, for commercial sale could be delayed or halted entirely.

The manufacture of biopharmaceutical products is complex and requires significant expertise and capital investment, including the development of advanced manufacturing techniques and process controls. The process of manufacturing our product candidates is extremely susceptible to product loss due to contamination, equipment failure or improper installation or operation of equipment, vendor or operator error, inconsistency in yields, variability in product characteristics and difficulties in scaling the production process. Even minor deviations from normal manufacturing processes could result in reduced production yields, product defects and other supply disruptions. If microbial, viral or other contaminations are discovered in our product candidates or in the manufacturing facilities in which our product candidates are made, such manufacturing facilities may need to be closed for an extended period of time to investigate and remedy the contamination. All of our TriTACs, ProTriTACs and TriTAC-XRs are manufactured from a vial of a master cell bank of that antibody’s production cell line. We have or intend to have one master cell bank for each TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR, that was or will be produced and tested in accordance with current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP, and applicable regulations. Each master cell bank is or will be stored in two independent locations, and we intend to produce working cell banks for each product candidate later in product development. It is possible that we could lose multiple cell banks from multiple locations and have our manufacturing severely impacted by the need to replace the cell banks. Any adverse developments affecting manufacturing operations for our product candidates, if any are approved, may result in shipment delays, inventory shortages, lot failures, product withdrawals or recalls, or other interruptions in the supply of our products. We may also have to take inventory write-offs and incur other charges and expenses for products that fail to meet specifications as a result of defects or storage over an extended period of time, undertake costly remediation efforts or seek more costly manufacturing alternatives.

Unstable market and economic conditions, including adverse developments affecting the financial services industry, such as actual events or concerns involving liquidity, defaults or non-performance by financial institutions or transactional counterparties, may have serious adverse consequences on our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price.

The global credit and financial markets have recently experienced extreme volatility and disruptions, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, increased interest rates, inflationary pressures, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, increases in unemployment rates and uncertainty about economic stability. The financial markets and the global economy may also be adversely affected by the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, including the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, terrorism or other geopolitical events. Sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries in response to such conflicts, including the one in Ukraine, may also adversely impact the financial markets and the global economy, and any economic countermeasures by affected countries and others could exacerbate market and economic instability. There can be no assurance that further deterioration in credit and financial markets and confidence in economic conditions will not occur. Our general business strategy may be adversely affected by any such economic downturn, volatile business environment or continued unpredictable and unstable market conditions. If the current equity and credit markets deteriorate, it may make any necessary debt or equity financing more difficult, more costly and more dilutive. Failure to secure any necessary financing in a timely manner and on favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on our growth strategy, financial performance and stock price and could require us to delay or abandon clinical development plans. In addition, there is a risk that one or more of our current service providers, manufacturers and other partners may not survive an economic downturn, which could directly affect our ability to attain our operating goals on schedule and on budget.

In addition, actual events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. For example, on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the FDIC, as receiver.

Although we assess our banking relationships as we believe necessary or appropriate, our access to funding sources and other credit arrangements in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our current and projected future business operations could be significantly impaired by factors that affect us, the financial institutions with which we have arrangements directly, or the financial services industry or economy in general. These factors could include, among others, events such as liquidity constraints or failures, the ability to perform obligations under various types of financial, credit or liquidity agreements or arrangements, disruptions or instability in the financial services industry or financial markets, or concerns or negative expectations about the prospects for companies in the financial services industry. These factors could involve financial institutions or financial services industry companies with which we have financial or business relationships but could also include factors involving financial markets or the financial services industry generally.

In addition, investor concerns regarding the U.S. or international financial systems could result in less favorable commercial financing terms, including higher interest rates or costs and tighter financial and operating covenants, or systemic limitations on access to credit and liquidity sources, thereby making it more difficult for us to acquire financing on acceptable terms or at all.

Our business may become subject to economic, political, regulatory and other risks associated with international operations.

Our business is subject to risks associated with conducting business internationally. Accordingly, our future results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:

•

economic weakness, including inflation and, increased interest rates, or any effects from a local or global recession or depression that may depress economic conditions for a prolonged period;

•

differing regulatory requirements for drug approvals in foreign countries;

•

differing jurisdictions could present different issues for securing, maintaining and/or obtaining freedom to operate in such jurisdictions;

•

potentially reduced protection for intellectual property rights;

•

difficulties in compliance with foreign laws and regulations;

•

changes in foreign regulations and customs, tariffs and trade barriers;

•

changes in foreign currency exchange rates and currency controls;

•

changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic environment;

•

trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements or other actions by the U.S. or foreign governments;

•

differing reimbursement regimes and price controls in certain foreign markets;

•

negative consequences from changes in tax laws;

•

compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad;

•

workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States;

•

difficulties associated with staffing and managing international operations, including differing labor relations;

•

production shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad;

•

business interruptions resulting from political instability and geo-political actions, particularly in foreign economies and markets (such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine), and other instances of war and terrorism, or health pandemics or epidemics, natural disasters, including earthquakes, typhoons, floods and fires.

We may become exposed to costly and damaging liability claims, either when testing our product candidates in the clinic or at the commercial stage, and our product liability insurance may not cover all damages from such claims.

We are exposed to potential product liability and professional indemnity risks that are inherent in the research, development, manufacturing, marketing and use of pharmaceutical products. While we currently have no products that have been approved for commercial sale, the current and future use of product candidates by us and our partners in clinical trials, and the sale of any approved products in the future, may expose us to liability claims. These claims might be made by patients that use the product, healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies, our partners or others selling such products. Any claims against us, regardless of their merit, could be difficult and costly to defend and could materially adversely affect the market for our product candidates or any prospects for commercialization of our product candidates.

Although the clinical trial process is designed to identify and assess potential side effects, it is always possible that a drug, even after regulatory approval, may exhibit unforeseen side effects. If any of our product candidates were to cause adverse side effects during clinical trials or after approval of the product candidate, we may be exposed to substantial liabilities. Physicians and patients may not comply with any warnings that identify known potential adverse effects and patients who should not use our product candidates.

Even successful defense against product liability claims would require significant financial and management resources. Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in: decreased demand for our product candidates; injury to our reputation; withdrawal of clinical trial participants; initiation of investigations by regulators; costs to defend the related litigation; a diversion of management’s time and our resources; substantial monetary awards to trial participants or patients; product recalls, withdrawals or labeling, marketing or promotional restrictions; loss of revenue; exhaustion of any available insurance and our capital resources; the inability to commercialize any product candidate; and a decline in our share price.

Although we maintain adequate product liability insurance for our product candidates, it is possible that our liabilities could exceed our insurance coverage. We intend to expand our insurance coverage to include the sale of commercial products if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates. However, we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or obtain insurance coverage that will be adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise. If a successful product liability claim or series of claims is brought against us for uninsured liabilities or in excess of insured liabilities, our assets may not be sufficient to cover such claims and our business operations could be impaired.

Our future growth and ability to compete depends on retaining our key personnel and recruiting additional qualified personnel.

Our success depends upon the continued contributions of our key management, scientific and technical personnel, many of whom have been instrumental for us and have substantial experience with our therapies and related technologies. The competition for qualified personnel in the biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical field is intense, and our future success depends upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled scientific, technical and managerial employees. We face competition for personnel from other companies, universities, public and private research institutions and other organizations. If our recruitment and retention efforts are unsuccessful in the future, it may be difficult for us to implement business strategy, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

In 2021 and 2022 we announced changes in our executive leadership positions. Changes in management may cause disruption in our business, strategic and employee relationships, which may delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives. In particular, the loss of key managers and senior scientists could delay our research and development activities. Transitions may also cause uncertainty among investors, employees and others concerning our future direction and performance.

We conduct all of our operations from our offices in South San Francisco, California. This region is headquarters to many other biopharmaceutical companies and many academic and research institutions. Competition for skilled personnel in this region is intense and may limit our ability to hire and retain highly qualified personnel on acceptable terms or at all.

We expect to need to expand our development, regulatory and, in the future, sales and marketing capabilities, and may encounter difficulties in managing and growing our operations, particularly in light of recent cost-containment activities.

As of July 31, 2023, we had 46 full-time employees. In order to progress our development, regulatory and sale and marketing capabilities, we expect to need to, over the long-term, significantly grow the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of drug development, regulatory affairs and sales and marketing. To manage any anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, manage our facilities and continue to efficiently utilize, recruit and train qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources, including recent cost-containment objectives, and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth, we may not be able to effectively manage any expansion of our operations or efficiently utilize, recruit and train qualified personnel. Any future expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage our operations and any growth of our operations could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.

In addition, managing our operations requires significant involvement from members of management, including in: identifying, recruiting, integrating, maintaining and motivating additional employees; managing our internal development efforts effectively, including the clinical and FDA review process for our product candidates, while complying with our contractual obligations to contractors and other third parties; and improving our operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures. Our future financial performance and our ability to commercialize our product candidates will depend, in part, on our ability to effectively manage our operations, and our management may at times also have to divert a disproportionate amount of its attention away from day-to-day activities in order to manage operating activities.

We rely or expect to rely in substantial part on certain independent organizations, advisors and consultants to provide certain services, including strategic, financial, business development services, as well as substantial aspects of regulatory approval, clinical management, manufacturing and preparation for potential commercial launch. There can be no assurance that the services of independent organizations, advisors and consultants will continue to be available to us on a timely basis when needed, or that we can find qualified replacements. In addition, if we are unable to effectively manage our outsourced activities or if the quality or accuracy of the services provided by consultants or contract manufacturing organizations is compromised for any reason, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates or otherwise advance our business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage our existing consultants or find other competent outside contractors and consultants on economically reasonable terms, or at all.

If we are not able to effectively expand our organization by hiring new employees and expanding our groups of consultants and contractors, we may not be able to successfully implement the tasks necessary to further develop and commercialize our product candidates and, accordingly, may not achieve our research, development and commercialization goals.

Acquisitions or joint ventures could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our stockholders and otherwise harm our business.

We actively evaluate various strategic transactions on an ongoing basis, and we are currently seeking a partner for the further development of our HPN536 program. We also may acquire other businesses, products or technologies as well as pursue strategic alliances, joint ventures or investments in complementary businesses. Any of these transactions could be material to our financial condition and operating results and expose us to many risks, including:

•

disruption in our relationships with existing strategic partners or suppliers as a result of such a transaction;

•

unanticipated liabilities related to acquired companies or joint ventures;

•

difficulties integrating acquired personnel, technologies and operations into our existing business;

•

retention of key employees;

•

diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to management of strategic alliances or joint ventures or acquisition integration challenges;

•

increases in our expenses and reductions in our cash available for operations and other uses; and

•

possible write-offs or impairment charges relating to acquired businesses.

In addition, we face significant competition in seeking appropriate strategic partners and the negotiation process is time-consuming and complex. Moreover, we may not be successful in our efforts to establish a strategic alliance or other alternative arrangements for our product candidates because they may be deemed to be at too early of a stage of development for collaborative effort and third parties may not view our product candidates as having the requisite potential to demonstrate safety and efficacy. Any delays in entering into new strategic transactions related to our product candidates could delay the development and commercialization of our product candidates in certain geographies for certain indications, which would harm our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Foreign acquisitions involve unique risks in addition to those mentioned above, including those related to integration of operations across different cultures and languages, currency risks, potentially adverse tax consequences of overseas operations and the particular economic, political and regulatory risks associated with specific countries.

The anticipated benefit of any strategic alliance, joint venture or acquisition may not materialize or such strategic alliance, joint venture or acquisition may be prohibited. Additionally, future acquisitions or dispositions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or amortization expenses or write-offs of goodwill, any of which could harm our financial condition. We cannot predict the number, timing or size of future joint ventures or acquisitions, or the effect that any such transactions might have on our operating results.

Our research and development activities could be affected or delayed as a result of possible restrictions on animal testing.

Certain laws and regulations require us to test our product candidates on animals before initiating clinical trials involving humans. Animal testing activities have been the subject of controversy and adverse publicity. Animal rights groups and other organizations and individuals have attempted to stop animal testing activities by pressing for legislation and regulation in these areas and by disrupting these activities through protests and other means. To the extent the activities of these groups are successful, our research and development activities may be interrupted, delayed or become more expensive.

Risks Related to Commercialization of Our Product Candidates

We operate in highly competitive and rapidly changing industries, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing competing products before or more successfully than we do.

The biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical industries are highly competitive and subject to significant and rapid technological change. Our success is highly dependent on our ability to discover, develop and obtain marketing approval for new and innovative products on a cost-effective basis and to market them successfully. In doing so, we face and will continue to face intense competition from a variety of businesses, including large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations. These organizations may have significantly greater resources than we do and conduct similar research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and marketing of products that compete with our product candidates. Mergers and acquisitions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries may result in even more resources being concentrated in our competitors. Competition may increase further as a result of advances in the commercial applicability of technologies and greater availability of capital for investment in these industries.

With the proliferation of new oncology drugs and therapies, we expect to face increasingly intense competition as new technologies become available. If we fail to stay at the forefront of technological change, we may be unable to compete effectively. Any product candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize will compete with existing therapies and new therapies that may become available in the future. The highly competitive nature of and rapid technological changes in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries could render our product candidates or our technology obsolete, less competitive or uneconomical. Our competitors may, among other things:

•

have significantly greater financial, manufacturing, marketing, drug development, technical and human resources than we do;

•

develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, less expensive, more convenient or easier to administer, or have fewer or less severe side effects;

•

obtain quicker regulatory approval;

•

establish superior proprietary positions covering our products and technologies;

•

implement more effective approaches to sales and marketing; or

•

form more advantageous strategic alliances.

Should any of these factors occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, any collaborators may decide to market and sell products that compete with the product candidates that we have agreed to license to them, and any competition by our collaborators could also have a material adverse effect on our future business, financial condition and results of operations.

Smaller and other early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.

If the market opportunity for any product candidate that we or our strategic partners develop is smaller than we believe, our revenue may be adversely affected, and our business may suffer.

We intend to initially focus our product candidate development on treatments for various oncology indications. Our projections of addressable patient populations that may benefit from treatment with our product candidates are based on our estimates. These estimates, which have been derived from a variety of sources, including scientific literature, surveys of clinics, patient foundations and market research, may prove to be incorrect. Further, new studies may change the estimated incidence or prevalence of these cancers. Additionally, the potentially addressable patient population for our product candidates may not ultimately be amenable to treatment with our product candidates. Our market opportunity may also be limited by future competitor treatments that enter the market. If any of our estimates prove to be inaccurate, the market opportunity for any product candidate that we or our strategic partners develop could be significantly diminished and have an adverse material impact on our business.

The market opportunities for our product candidates may be limited to those patients who are ineligible for or have failed prior treatments and may be small.

Cancer therapies are sometimes characterized by line of therapy (first, second, third, fourth, etc.), and the FDA often initially approves new therapies only for use in a particular line or lines of therapy. When cancer is detected early enough, first line therapy is sometimes adequate to provide a cure or prolong life without a cure. Whenever first line therapy (typically chemotherapy, hormone therapy, surgery or a combination of these) proves unsuccessful, second line therapy (typically more chemotherapy, radiation, antibody drugs, tumor targeted small molecules or a combination of these) may be administered. Third or fourth line therapies can include antibody and small molecule targeted therapies, more invasive forms of surgery and new technologies. We may initially seek approval of our product candidates as a third line therapy for patients who have failed other approved treatments. Subsequently, for product candidates that prove to be sufficiently beneficial, if any, we would expect to seek approval as a second and first line therapy. However, there is no guarantee that our product candidates, even if initially approved, would be subsequently approved as a second or first line therapy. In addition, we may have to conduct additional clinical trials prior to gaining approval as a second or first line therapy. Because the potentially addressable patient target population for our product candidates may be limited to patients who are ineligible for or have failed prior treatments, even if we obtain significant market share for our product candidates, we may never achieve profitability.

We may expend our limited resources to pursue a particular product candidate or indication and fail to capitalize on product candidates or indications that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we focus on research programs, therapeutic platforms and product candidates that we identify for specific indications. As a result, we may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other therapeutic platforms or product candidates or for other indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. Our spending on current and future research and development programs, therapeutic platforms and product candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable products. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights.

Even if approved, our products may not gain market acceptance, in which case we may not be able to generate product revenues, which will materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Even if the FDA or any other regulatory authority approves the marketing of any product candidates that we develop on our own or with a collaborator, physicians, healthcare providers, patients or the medical community may not accept or use them. If these

products do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenues or any profits from operations. The degree of market acceptance of any of our product candidates will depend on a variety of factors, including:

•

the timing of market introduction;

•

the number and clinical profile of competing products;

•

our ability to provide acceptable evidence of safety and efficacy;

•

the prevalence and severity of any side effects;

•

relative convenience and ease of administration;

•

cost-effectiveness;

•

patient diagnostics and screening infrastructure in each market;

•

marketing and distribution support;

•

availability of coverage, adequate reimbursement and sufficient payment from health maintenance organizations and other insurers, both public and private, for our product candidates, or the procedures utilizing our product candidates, if approved; and

•

other potential advantages over alternative treatment methods.

If our product candidates fail to gain market acceptance, this will have a material adverse impact on our ability to generate revenues to provide a satisfactory, or any, return on our investments. Even if some products achieve market acceptance, the market may prove not to be large enough to allow us to generate significant revenues.

We currently have no marketing, sales or distribution infrastructure. If we are unable to develop sales, marketing and distribution capabilities on our own or through collaborations, or if we fail to achieve adequate pricing and/or reimbursement we will not be successful in commercializing our product candidates.

We currently have no marketing, sales and distribution capabilities because all of our product candidates are still in clinical or preclinical development. If any of our product candidates are approved, we intend either to establish a sales and marketing organization with technical expertise and supporting distribution capabilities to commercialize our product candidates, or to outsource this function to a third party. Either of these options would be expensive and time consuming. These costs may be incurred in advance of any approval of our product candidates. In addition, we may not be able to hire a sales force that is sufficient in size or has adequate expertise in the medical markets that we intend to target. Any failure or delay in the development of our internal sales, marketing and distribution capabilities would adversely impact the commercialization of our products, if approved.

To the extent that we enter into collaboration agreements with respect to marketing, sales or distribution, our product revenue may be lower than if we directly marketed or sold any approved products. In addition, any revenue we receive will depend in whole or in part upon the efforts of these third-party collaborators, which may not be successful and are generally not within our control. If we are unable to enter into these arrangements on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully commercialize any approved products. If we are not successful in commercializing any approved products, either on our own or through collaborations with one or more third parties, our future product revenue will suffer and we may incur significant additional losses.

We have never commercialized a product candidate before and may lack the necessary expertise, personnel and resources to successfully commercialize any products on our own or together with suitable collaborators.

We have never commercialized a product candidate, and we currently have no sales force, marketing or distribution capabilities. To achieve commercial success for the product candidates, which we may license to others, we will rely on the assistance and guidance of those collaborators. For product candidates for which we retain commercialization rights, we will have to develop our own sales, marketing and supply organization or outsource these activities to a third party.

Factors that may affect our ability to commercialize our product candidates on our own include recruiting and retaining adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel, obtaining access to or persuading adequate numbers of physicians to prescribe our product candidates and other unforeseen costs associated with creating an independent sales and marketing organization. Developing a sales and marketing organization will be expensive and time-consuming and could delay the launch of our product candidates. We may not be able to build an effective sales and marketing organization. If we are unable to build our own distribution and marketing capabilities or to find suitable partners for the commercialization of our product candidates, we may not generate revenues from them or be able to reach or sustain profitability.

Our product candidates for which we intend to seek approval as biologic products may face competition sooner than anticipated.

The ACA includes a subtitle called the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, or BPCIA, which created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date that the reference product was first approved by the FDA. In addition, the approval of a biosimilar product may not be made effective by the FDA until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was first approved. During this 12-year period of exclusivity, another company may still market a competing version of the reference product if the FDA approves a full BLA for the competing product containing the sponsor’s own preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency of their product. The law is complex and is still being interpreted and implemented by the FDA. As a result, its ultimate impact, implementation, and meaning are subject to uncertainty.

We believe that any of our product candidates approved as a biological product under a BLA should qualify for the 12-year period of exclusivity. However, there is a risk that this exclusivity could be shortened due to congressional action or otherwise, or that the FDA will not consider our product candidates to be reference products for competing products, potentially creating the opportunity for competition sooner than anticipated. Other aspects of the BPCIA, some of which may impact the BPCIA exclusivity provisions, have also been the subject of recent litigation. Moreover, the extent to which a biosimilar, once approved, will be substituted for any one of our reference products in a way that is similar to traditional generic substitution for non-biological products is not yet clear, and will depend on a number of marketplace and regulatory factors that are still developing.

Jurisdictions in addition to the United States have established abbreviated pathways for regulatory approval of biological products that are biosimilar to earlier approved reference products. For example, the European Union has had an established regulatory pathway for biosimilars since 2005.

The increased likelihood of biosimilar competition has increased the risk of loss of innovators’ market exclusivity. Due to this risk, and uncertainties regarding patent protection, if our clinical candidates are approved for marketing, it is not possible to predict the length of market exclusivity for any particular product with certainty based solely on the expiration of the relevant patent(s) or the current forms of regulatory exclusivity. It is also not possible to predict changes in United States regulatory law that might reduce biological product regulatory exclusivity. The loss of market exclusivity for a product would likely materially and negatively affect revenues and we may not generate adequate or sufficient revenues from them or be able to reach or sustain profitability.

Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties

We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties, including independent clinical investigators and CROs, to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, comply with applicable regulatory requirements or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates and our business could be substantially harmed.

We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third parties, including independent clinical investigators and third-party CROs, to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials and to monitor and manage data for our ongoing preclinical and clinical programs. We rely on these parties for execution of our preclinical studies and clinical trials, and control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies and trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our reliance on these third parties does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We and our third-party contractors and CROs are required to comply with GCP requirements, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for all of our products candidates in clinical development. Regulatory authorities enforce these GCPs through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators and trial sites. If we or any of our CROs fail to comply with applicable GCPs, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority will determine that any of our clinical trials comply with GCP regulations. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product produced under cGMP regulations. Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.

Further, these investigators and CROs are not our employees, and we will not be able to control, other than by contract, the amount of resources, including time, which they devote to our product candidates and clinical trials. If independent investigators or CROs fail to devote sufficient resources to the development of our product candidates, or if their performance is substandard, it may delay or compromise the prospects for approval and commercialization of any product candidates that we develop. In addition, the use of third-party service providers may require us to disclose our proprietary information to these parties, which could increase the risk that this information will be misappropriated.

Our CROs have the right to terminate their agreements with us in the event of an uncured material breach. In addition, some of our CROs have an ability to terminate their respective agreements with us if it can be reasonably demonstrated that the safety of the subjects participating in our clinical trials warrants such termination, if we make a general assignment for the benefit of our creditors or if we are liquidated.

If any of our relationships with these third-party CROs terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. If CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our product candidates. As a result, our results of operations and the commercial prospects for our product candidates would be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenues could be delayed.

Switching or adding additional CROs involves additional cost and requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new CRO commences work. As a result, delays occur, which can materially impact our ability to meet our desired clinical development timelines. Additionally, CROs may lack the capacity to absorb higher workloads or take on additional capacity to support our needs. Though we carefully manage our relationships with our CROs, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects.

We may not realize the benefits of any collaborative or licensing arrangement we enter into, and if we fail to enter into new strategic relationships our business, financial condition, commercialization prospects and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Our product development programs and the potential commercialization of our product candidates will require substantial additional cash to fund expenses. Therefore, for some of our product candidates, we may decide to enter into new collaborations with pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical companies for the development and potential commercialization of those product candidates. For instance, we have a discovery collaboration and license agreement with AbbVie, pursuant to which we have licensed the development and commercialization of certain of our product candidates, as well as a Development and Option Agreement with AbbVie, pursuant to which we granted to AbbVie an option to a worldwide, exclusive license with respect to HPN217.

We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Collaborations are complex and time-consuming to negotiate and document. We may also be restricted under existing and future collaboration agreements from entering into agreements on certain terms with other potential collaborators. We may not be able to negotiate collaborations on acceptable terms, or at all. If our strategic collaborations do not result in the successful development and commercialization of product candidates, or if one of our collaborators terminates its agreement with us, we may not receive any future research funding or milestone or royalty payments under the collaboration. Moreover, our estimates of the potential revenue we are eligible to receive under our strategic collaborations may include potential payments related to therapeutic programs for which our collaborators have discontinued development or may discontinue development in the future. If that were to occur, we may have to curtail the development of a particular product candidate, reduce or delay its development program or one or more of our other development programs, delay its potential commercialization or reduce the scope of our sales or marketing activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at our own expense. If we elect to increase our expenditures to fund development or commercialization activities on our own, we may need to obtain additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we will not be able to bring our product candidates to market and generate product revenue. If we do enter into a new collaboration agreement, we could be subject to the following risks, each of which may materially harm our business, commercialization prospects and financial condition:

•

we may not be able to control the amount and timing of resources that the collaboration partner devotes to the product development program;

•

the collaboration partner may experience financial difficulties;

•

we may be required to relinquish important rights such as marketing, distribution and intellectual property rights;

•

a collaborator could move forward with a competing product developed either independently or in collaboration with third parties, including our competitors; or

•

business combinations or significant changes in a collaborator’s business strategy may adversely affect our willingness to complete our obligations under any arrangement.

If we license products or businesses, we may not be able to realize the benefit of such transactions if we are unable to successfully integrate them with our existing operations and company culture. We cannot be certain that, following a strategic transaction or license, we will achieve the results, revenue or specific net income that justifies such transaction. In addition, pursuant

to the terms of our Series A Preferred Stock, we will be required to use a portion of the proceeds generated from certain collaboration or licensing agreements to redeem shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize the full benefit of payments made pursuant to any such agreements to further fund our operations.

We rely on third-party manufacturers to produce our product candidates. Any failure by a third-party manufacturer to produce acceptable product candidates for us may delay or impair our ability to initiate or complete our clinical trials or commercialize approved products.

We do not currently own or operate any manufacturing facilities nor do we have any in-house manufacturing experience or personnel. We work with third-party contract manufacturers to produce sufficient quantities of our product candidates for preclinical testing and clinical trials, in compliance with applicable regulatory and quality standards, and intend to do so for the commercial manufacture of our products, if approved. If we are unable to arrange for such third-party manufacturing sources, or fail to do so on commercially reasonable terms, we may not be able to successfully produce sufficient supply of product candidate or we may be delayed in doing so. Such failure or substantial delay could materially harm our business. As an example, we have in the past, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, experienced some minor disruptions in our manufacturing supply chain that affected our drug supply and patient enrollment in some of our clinical trials.

Our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms rely on third parties for the biological materials used in testing and qualifying our products. Some biological materials have not always met our expectations or requirements, and any disruption in the supply of these biological materials could materially adversely affect our business. Although we have control processes and screening procedures, biological materials are susceptible to damage and contamination and may contain active pathogens. Improper storage of these materials, by us or any third-party suppliers, may require us to destroy some of our biological raw materials or product candidates.

Reliance on third-party manufacturers entails risks to which we would not be subject if we manufactured product candidates ourselves, including reliance on the third party for regulatory compliance and quality control and quality assurance, volume and timing of production, the possibility of breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party because of factors beyond our control (including a failure to synthesize and manufacture our product candidates in accordance with our product specifications) and the possibility of termination or nonrenewal of the agreement by the third party at a time that is costly or damaging to us. In addition, the FDA and other regulatory authorities require that our product candidates be manufactured according to cGMPs. Pharmaceutical manufacturers and their subcontractors are required to register their facilities or products manufactured at the time of submission of the marketing application and then annually thereafter with the FDA and certain state and foreign agencies. They are also subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA, state and other foreign authorities. Any subsequent discovery of problems with a product, or a manufacturing or laboratory facility used by us or our third-party suppliers, may result in restrictions on the product or on the manufacturing or laboratory facility, including marketed product recall, suspension of manufacturing, product seizure, or a voluntary withdrawal of the drug from the market. We may have little to no control regarding the occurrence of third-party manufacturer incidents. Any failure by our third-party manufacturers to comply with cGMP or failure to scale up manufacturing processes, including any failure to deliver sufficient quantities of product candidates in a timely manner, could lead to an irreparable delay in our development or commercialization timeline.

To date, we have relied on one single-source supplier per product for bulk drug substance, or BDS. The loss of any of our suppliers or their failure to supply us with BDS on a timely basis could cause a delay in our ability to develop the impacted product candidates and adversely affect our business.

We depend on one single-source supplier per product for BDS for our HPN217 and HPN601 programs. We have several suppliers for our HPN328 program. However, there can be no assurance that our supply of BDS will not be limited, interrupted, or of satisfactory quality or continue to be available at acceptable prices. Additionally, we do not have any control over the process or timing of the acquisition or manufacture of materials by our suppliers and cannot ensure that our suppliers will deliver to us the BDS we order on time, or at all. The loss of BDS provided by our suppliers could require us to change the design of the product candidate development process for the impacted product(s) based on the functions, limitations, features and specifications of the replacement.

In addition, the lead time needed to establish a relationship with a new supplier can be lengthy, and we may experience delays in meeting demand in the event we must switch to a new supplier for any product. The time and effort to qualify a new supplier could result in additional costs, diversion of resources or reduced manufacturing yields, any of which would negatively impact our operating results. Our reliance on a single-source supplier per product exposes us to certain risks, including the following:

•

our suppliers may cease or reduce production or deliveries, raise prices or renegotiate terms which would impact those products produced;

•

we may be unable to locate a suitable replacement on acceptable terms or on a timely basis, if at all;

•

if there is a disruption to any single-source supplier's operations, and if we are unable to enter into arrangements with alternative suppliers, we may need to halt our clinical trial programs;

•

delays caused by supply issues may harm our reputation, frustrate our clinical trial sites and cause them to turn to our competitors for future projects; and

•

our ability to develop our product candidates could be materially and adversely impacted if the single-source suppliers upon which we rely, per product, were to experience a significant business challenge, disruption or failure due to issues such as financial difficulties or bankruptcy, issues relating to other customers such as regulatory or quality compliance issues, or other financial, legal, regulatory or reputational issues.

Moreover, to meet anticipated demand, our suppliers may need to increase manufacturing capacity, which could involve significant challenges. This may require us and our suppliers to invest substantial additional funds and hire and retain the technical personnel who have the necessary experience. Neither we nor our suppliers may successfully complete any required increase to existing manufacturing capacity in a timely manner, or at all.

We currently rely on third-party suppliers and other third parties for production of our product candidates, and our dependence on these third parties may impair the advancement of our research and development programs and the development of our product candidates. Moreover, we intend to rely on third parties to produce commercial supplies of any approved product candidate and our commercialization of any of our product candidates could be stopped, delayed or made less profitable if those third parties fail to obtain approval of the FDA or comparable regulatory authorities, fail to provide us with sufficient quantities of product or fail to do so at acceptable quality levels or prices or fail to otherwise complete their duties in compliance with their obligations to us or other parties.

We do not currently own or operate any manufacturing facilities, nor do we have any in-house manufacturing experience or personnel. We rely on and expect to continue to rely on third-party CMOs for the supply of cGMP-grade, clinical trial materials and commercial quantities of our product candidates and products, if approved. Reliance on third-party providers may expose us to more risk than if we were to manufacture product candidates ourselves. The facilities used by our contract manufacturers to manufacture our commercial products must be approved by the FDA or other global regulatory authorities pursuant to inspections that will be conducted after we submit our marketing authorization application or BLA to the relevant agency. We have limited control over the manufacturing process of, and beyond contractual terms, we are completely dependent on our contract manufacturing partners for compliance with cGMP for the manufacture of our product candidates. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of global regulatory authorities, they will not be able to secure and/or maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturing facilities. In addition, we have limited control over the ability of our contract manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. If the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority does not approve these facilities for the manufacture of our product candidates or if it withdraws any such approval in the future, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which would significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates, if approved. In addition, any failure to achieve and maintain compliance with these laws, regulations and standards could subject us to the risk that we may have to delay the manufacturing of our product candidates or approved products, which would adversely affect our business and reputation. Furthermore, third-party providers may breach existing agreements they have with us because of factors beyond our control. They may also terminate or refuse to renew their agreement because of their own financial difficulties or business priorities, at a time that is costly or otherwise inconvenient for us. If we were unable to find an adequate replacement or another acceptable service provider in time, our clinical trials could be delayed or our commercial activities could be harmed. In addition, the fact that we are dependent on our collaborators, our suppliers and other third parties for the manufacture, filling, storage and distribution of our product candidates means that we are subject to the risk that the products may have manufacturing defects that would prevent the sale of these products to global markets. The inability to sell our products containing such defects could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Growth in the costs and expenses of components or raw materials may also adversely influence our business, financial condition and results of operations. Supply sources could be interrupted from time to time and, if interrupted, there is no guarantee that supplies could be resumed (whether in part or in whole) within a reasonable timeframe and at an acceptable cost or at all.

We rely on our manufacturers and other subcontractors to comply with and respect the proprietary rights of others in conducting their contractual obligations for us. If our manufacturers or other subcontractors fail to acquire the proper licenses or otherwise infringe third-party proprietary rights in the course of completing their contractual obligations to us, we may have to find alternative manufacturers or defend against claims of infringement, either of which would significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates, if approved. In addition, although we require manufacturers and service providers to assign or license to us their interest in and to intellectual property rights to improvements made by them in the development and manufacturing process for our products, in future contracts that we may enter into with these third parties, we may not own, or may have to share, these intellectual property rights to improvements.

We depend on third-party suppliers for key raw materials used in our manufacturing processes, and the loss of these third-party suppliers or their inability to supply us with adequate raw materials could harm our business.

We rely on our manufacturers to purchase the raw materials necessary to produce our product candidates for our clinical trials. There are a limited number of suppliers for raw materials that we use to manufacture our drugs and our manufacturers may qualify second-source suppliers of critical raw materials to prevent a possible disruption of the supply of the materials necessary to produce our product candidates for our clinical trials, and if approved, ultimately for commercial sale. We do not have any control over the process or timing of the acquisition of these raw materials by our manufacturers. We cannot be sure that the third-party raw material suppliers will remain in business, or that they will not be purchased by a company that is not interested in continuing to produce these materials. In addition, the lead time needed to qualify a new raw material supplier can be lengthy, and we may experience delays in meeting demand for our product in the event a new supplier must be used. The time and effort to qualify a new raw material supplier could result in additional costs, diversion of resources or inability to produce a comparable product candidate, any of which would negatively impact our operating results. Any significant delay in the supply of a product candidate for an ongoing clinical trial due to the need to replace a third-party raw material manufacturer, or the ability of our third-party manufacturers to obtain raw materials timely, could considerably slow our enrollment or delay completion of our clinical trials, product testing and potential regulatory approval of our product candidates. For example, in 2021, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our supply chain components, the start of our manufacturing run to resupply the HPN328 trial was delayed until early 2022. As a result, enrollment of new patients in the HPN328 study was temporarily slower until the resupply was delivered in October 2022. If our manufacturers or we are unable to purchase these raw materials after regulatory approval has been obtained for our product candidates, the commercial launch of our product candidates would be delayed or there would be a shortage in supply, which would impair our ability to generate revenues from the sale of our product candidates.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property and Information Technology

We rely on patents and other intellectual property rights to protect our technology, including product candidates and our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms, the enforcement, defense and maintenance of which may be challenging and costly. Failure to enforce or protect these rights adequately could harm our ability to compete and impair our business.

Our commercial success depends in part on obtaining and maintaining patents and other forms of intellectual property rights for technology related to our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms, including, but not limited to, our product candidates, methods used to manufacture those product candidates, formulations thereof and the methods for treating patients using those product candidates. Given that the development of our technology and product candidates is at an early stage, our intellectual property portfolio with respect to certain aspects of our technology and product candidates is also at an early stage. Failure to protect or to obtain, maintain or extend adequate patent and other intellectual property rights could materially adversely affect our ability to develop and market our product candidates.

We seek to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our novel platform technologies and product candidates that are important to our business. The patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to prepare, file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of inventions made in the course of development and commercialization activities before it is too late to obtain patent protection on them. Further, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our current or future patent rights are highly uncertain. Our pending and future patent applications may not result in patents being issued which protect our technology or product candidates, in whole or in part, or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and product candidates. The patent examination process may require us to narrow the scope of the claims of our pending and future patent applications, which may limit the scope of patent protection that may be obtained. We cannot assure you that all of the potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents and patent applications has been found. If such prior art exists, it can invalidate a patent or prevent a patent from issuing from a pending patent application. Even if patents do successfully issue and even if such patents cover our product candidates, third parties may initiate opposition, interference, re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, nullification or derivation action in court or before patent offices, or similar proceedings challenging the validity, enforceability or scope of such patents, which may result in the patent claims being narrowed or invalidated. Our patent applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology claimed in such applications unless and until a patent issues from such applications, and then only to the extent the issued claims cover the technology.

Because patent applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are confidential for a period of time after filing, and some remain so until issued, we cannot be certain that we were the first to file any patent application related to our technology, including a particular product candidate. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain.

Furthermore, if third parties have filed such patent applications on or before March 15, 2013, an interference proceeding can be initiated by such third parties to determine who was the first to invent any of the subject matter covered by the patent claims of our applications. If third parties have filed such applications after March 15, 2013, a derivation proceeding can be initiated by such third

parties to determine whether our invention was derived from theirs. Even where we have a valid and enforceable patent, we may not be able to exclude others from practicing our invention where the other party can show that they used the invention in commerce before our filing date or the other party benefits from a compulsory license.

We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our issued patents relating to one or more of our product candidates or our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms, which could ultimately render our patents invalid or unenforceable and adversely affect our competitive position.

Competitors may infringe our patents or other intellectual property that relate to our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms and product candidates, their respective methods of use, manufacture and formulations thereof. To protect our competitive position and counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may from time to time need to resort to litigation to enforce or defend any patents or other intellectual property rights owned by us by filing infringement claims. As enforcement of intellectual property rights is difficult, unpredictable and expensive, we may fail in enforcing our rights—in which case our competitors may be permitted to use our technology without being required to pay us any license fees. In addition, litigation involving our patents carries the risk that one or more of our patents will be held invalid (in whole or in part, on a claim-by-claim basis) or held unenforceable. Such an adverse court ruling could allow third parties to commercialize our product candidates or methods, or our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms, and then compete directly with us, without payment to us.

If we were to initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering one of our product candidates or methods, the defendant could counterclaim that our patent is invalid and/or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States or in certain jurisdictions in Europe, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity and/or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, for example, lack of novelty, obviousness or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or made a misleading statement, during prosecution. Third parties may also raise similar invalidity and/or unenforceability claims before administrative bodies in the United States or abroad, even outside the context of litigation. Such mechanisms include inter partes review, ex parte re-examination and post grant review in the United States, and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings). The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability during patent litigation is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity and/or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on one or more of our technologies, product candidates, methods or certain aspects of our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms. Such a loss of patent protection could have a material adverse impact on our business.

There is also a risk that, even if the validity of our patents is upheld, the court will construe our patent’s claims narrowly or decide that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the invention at issue on the grounds that our patent claims do not cover the invention. Even if we establish infringement, the court may decide not to grant an injunction against further infringing activity and instead award only monetary damages, which may or may not be an adequate remedy. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during litigation. Patents and other intellectual property rights also will not protect our technology if competitors design around our protected technology without infringing our patents or other intellectual property rights.

Because of the expense and uncertainty of litigation, we may not be in a position to enforce our intellectual property rights against third parties. Instead, we may conclude that even if a third party is infringing our issued patents relating to our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms and/or product candidates, any patents that may be issued as a result of our pending or future patent applications or other intellectual property rights, the risk-adjusted cost of bringing and enforcing such a claim or action may be too high or not in the best interest of us or our stockholders. In such cases, we may decide that the more prudent course of action is to simply monitor the situation or initiate or seek some other non-litigious action or solution.

We may fail to identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration of a third-party patent which might adversely affect our ability to develop our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms and product candidates.

We cannot guarantee that our operations and activities do not, or will not in the future, infringe existing or future patents. We also cannot guarantee that any of our patent searches or analyses, including the identification of relevant patents, the scope of patent claims or the expiration of relevant patents, are complete or thorough, nor can we be certain that we have identified each and every third-party patent and pending application in the United States and abroad that is relevant to our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms or necessary for the commercialization of our product candidates in any jurisdiction.

Numerous U.S. and foreign patents and pending patent applications exist in our market that are owned by third parties. Our competitors in both the United States and abroad, many of which have substantially greater resources and have made substantial investments in patent portfolios and competing technologies, may have applied for or obtained or may in the future apply for and obtain, patents that will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make, use and sell our product candidates. We do not always conduct independent reviews of pending patent applications of and patents issued to third parties. Patent applications in the United States and elsewhere are typically published approximately 18 months after the earliest filing for which priority is claimed, with such earliest filing date being commonly referred to as the priority date. Certain U.S. applications that will not be filed outside the United States can remain confidential until patents are issued. In addition, patent applications in the United States and elsewhere can be pending for many years before issuance, and unintentionally abandoned patents or applications can be revived. Furthermore, pending patent applications that have been published can, subject to certain limitations, be later amended in a manner that could cover our technologies, our product candidates or the use thereof. As such, there may be applications of third parties now pending or recently revived patents of which we are unaware. These applications may later result in issued patents, or the revival of previously abandoned patents, that will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make, use or sell our product candidates.

The scope of a patent claim is determined by an interpretation of law, the written disclosure in a patent and the patent’s prosecution history. Our interpretation of the relevance or the scope of a patent or a pending application may be incorrect, which may negatively impact our ability to market our product candidates. We may incorrectly determine that our product candidates are not covered by a third-party patent or may incorrectly predict whether a third party’s pending application will issue with claims of relevant scope. Our determination of the expiration date of any patent in the United States or abroad that we consider relevant may be incorrect, which may negatively impact our ability to develop and market our product candidates. Our failure to identify and correctly interpret relevant patents may negatively impact our ability to develop and market our product candidates.

We cannot provide any assurances that third-party patents do not exist which might be enforced against our current technology, including our platform technologies, product candidates and their respective methods of use, manufacture and formulations thereof, and could result in either an injunction prohibiting our manufacture or future sales, or, with respect to our future sales, an obligation on our part to pay royalties and/or other forms of compensation to third parties, which could be significant.

Intellectual property rights of third parties could adversely affect our ability to develop or commercialize our product candidates, such that we could be required to litigate or obtain licenses from third parties in order to develop or market our product candidates. Such litigation or licenses could be costly or not available on commercially reasonable terms.

Our commercial success depends, in part, on our ability to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates without infringing the intellectual property and other proprietary rights of third parties. Our competitive position may suffer if patents issued to third parties or other third-party intellectual property rights cover our methods or product candidates or elements thereof, our manufacture or uses relevant to our development plans, our product candidates, or other attributes of our product candidates or our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms. In such cases, we may not be in a position to develop or commercialize product candidates unless we successfully pursue litigation to nullify or invalidate the third-party intellectual property right concerned, which can be expensive and time consuming, or enter into a license agreement with the intellectual property right holder, if available on commercially reasonable terms.

There is a substantial amount of intellectual property litigation in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, and we have and may from time to time become party to, or threatened with, litigation or other adversarial proceedings regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our product candidates. For example, from 2018 through 2021, we were involved in a suit that involved claims for misappropriation of trade secrets and for alleged breach of a contractual non-compete provision, brought against us by Maverick Therapeutics, Inc., which had the potential to impair the development of our ProTriTAC platform. The court ultimately ruled in our favor on these claims, but we may be subject to similar litigation in the future.

The various markets in which we plan to operate are subject to frequent and extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. In addition, many companies in intellectual property-dependent industries, including those producing therapeutics to treat and potentially cure cancer, have employed intellectual property litigation as a means to gain an advantage over competitors. As a result, we may be required to defend against claims of intellectual property infringement that may be asserted by our competitors against us and, if the outcome of any such litigation is adverse to us, it may affect our ability to compete effectively.

Third-party intellectual property right holders, including our competitors, may assert and actively bring infringement claims against us based on existing or future intellectual property rights. The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have produced a significant number of patents, and it may not always be clear to industry participants, including us, which patents cover various types of product candidates or methods of use. The coverage of patents is subject to interpretation by the courts, and the interpretation is not always uniform.

If we are sued for patent infringement, we would need to demonstrate that our product candidates or platform technologies either do not infringe the patent claims of a relevant patent or that the patent claims are invalid or unenforceable, and we may not be able to do this. Proving invalidity may be difficult. For example, in the United States, proving invalidity in court requires a showing of clear and convincing evidence to overcome the presumption of validity enjoyed by issued patents. Even if we are successful in these proceedings, we may incur substantial costs and the time and attention of our management and scientific personnel could be diverted in pursuing these proceedings, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations. In addition, we may not have sufficient resources to bring these actions to a successful conclusion. In addition, we may not be able to successfully settle or otherwise resolve such infringement claims. If we are unable to successfully settle future claims on terms acceptable to us, we may be required to engage or continue costly, unpredictable and time-consuming litigation and may be prevented from or experience substantial delays in marketing our product candidates.

Our involvement in litigation, and in any interferences, opposition proceedings or other intellectual property proceedings inside and outside of the United States may divert management from focusing on business operations, could cause us to spend significant amounts of money and may have no guarantee of success. Any current and potential intellectual property litigation also could force us to do one or more of the following:

•

stop selling, incorporating, manufacturing or using our product candidates or any products, if approved, in the United States and/or other jurisdictions that use the subject intellectual property;

•

obtain from a third party asserting its intellectual property rights, a license to sell or use the relevant technology, including the obligation to pay royalties, which license may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all, or may be non-exclusive thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us;

•

redesign those products or processes that use any allegedly infringing or misappropriated technology, which may result in significant cost or delay to us, or which redesign could be technically infeasible; or

•

pay damages, including the possibility of treble damages and attorneys’ fees in a patent case if a court finds us to have willfully infringed certain intellectual property rights.

Intellectual property litigation or other legal proceedings could cause us to spend substantial resources and distract our personnel from their normal responsibilities.

Litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims, with or without merit, is unpredictable and generally expensive and time consuming. Even if resolved in our favor, such litigation and other legal proceedings may cause us to incur significant expenses and is likely to divert significant resources from our core business, including distracting our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities, and may impact our reputation. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, we could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common shares. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce our resources available for development activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their substantially greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.

We may need to obtain additional licenses of third-party technology that may not be available to us or are available only on commercially unreasonable terms, and which may cause us to operate our business in a more costly or otherwise adverse manner that was not anticipated.

We currently have rights to the intellectual property, including patent applications relating to our TriTAC, ProTriTAC and TriTAC-XR platforms and our product candidates. From time to time, we may be required to license technologies relating to our therapeutic research programs from additional third parties to further develop or commercialize our platform technologies and product candidates. Similarly, the targets of our product candidates have also been the subject of research by many companies that have filed patent applications or have patents related to such targets and therapeutic methods relating to those targets. There can be no assurance any such patents will not be asserted against us or that we will not need to seek licenses from such third parties. We may not be able to secure such licenses on acceptable terms, if at all, and any such litigation would be costly and time-consuming.

Should we be required to obtain licenses to any third-party technology, including any such patents required to manufacture, use or sell our product candidates, the growth of our business will likely depend in part on our ability to acquire, in-license, maintain or use these proprietary rights. The inability to obtain any third-party license required to develop or commercialize any of our product candidates could cause us to abandon any related efforts, which could seriously harm our business and operations.

In addition, our product candidates may require specific formulations to work effectively and efficiently and the rights to these formulations may be held by others. We may be unable to acquire or in-license any compositions, methods of use, processes, or other third-party intellectual property rights from third parties that we identify as necessary for our product candidates. The licensing and acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights is a competitive area, and a number of more established companies are also pursuing strategies to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive. These established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, cash resources, and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities.

•

stop selling, incorporating, manufacturing or using our product candidates or any products, if approved, in the United States and/or other jurisdictions that use the subject intellectual property;

•

In addition, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. We also may be unable to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights on terms that would allow us to make an appropriate return on our investment. Even if we are able to obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. If we are unable to successfully obtain a license to third-party intellectual property rights necessary for the development of a product candidate or program, we may have to abandon development of that product candidate or program and our business and financial condition could suffer.

If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets of interest and our business may be adversely affected.

Our registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names may be challenged, infringed, circumvented or declared generic or determined to be infringing on other marks. We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks and trade names, which we need to build name recognition by potential collaborators, partners or customers in our markets of interest. Over the long term, if we are unable to establish name recognition based on our trademarks and trade names, then we may not be able to compete effectively and our business may be adversely affected. If other entities use trademarks similar to ours in different jurisdictions, or have senior rights to ours, it could interfere with our use of our current trademarks throughout the world.

During trademark registration proceedings, we may receive rejections. Although we would be given an opportunity to respond to those rejections, we may be unable to overcome such rejections. In addition, in both the USPTO and comparable agencies in many foreign jurisdictions, third parties are given an opportunity to oppose pending trademark applications and to seek to cancel registered trademarks. Opposition or cancellation proceedings may be filed against our trademarks, which may not survive such proceedings. If we are unable to establish name recognition based on our trademarks and trade names, we may not be able to compete effectively and our business may be adversely affected.

We may license our trademarks and trade names to third parties, such as distributors. Though these license agreements may provide guidelines for how our trademarks and trade names may be used, a breach of these agreements or misuse of our trademarks and tradenames by our licensees may jeopardize our rights in or diminish the goodwill associated with our trademarks and trade names.

Patent terms may be inadequate to protect our competitive position on our product candidates for an adequate amount of time.

Patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, if all maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years from its earliest U.S. non-provisional filing date. Various extensions may be available, but the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Even if patents covering our product candidates are obtained, once the patent life has expired for a product, we may be open to competition from competitive medications, including biosimilar or generic medications. In addition, although upon issuance in the United States a patent’s life can be increased based on certain delays caused by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or the USPTO, this increase can be reduced or eliminated based on certain delays caused by the patent applicant during patent prosecution. If we do not have sufficient patent life to protect our product candidates and any products, if approved, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.

If we do not obtain protection under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments and similar non-U.S. legislation for extending the term of patents covering each of our product candidates, our business may be materially harmed

Depending upon the timing, duration and conditions of FDA marketing approval of our product candidates, one or more of our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, referred to as the Hatch-Waxman Amendments, and similar legislation in the European Union. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent term extension of up to five years for a patent covering an approved product as compensation for effective patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process. However, we may not receive an extension if we fail to apply within applicable deadlines, fail to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise fail to satisfy applicable requirements. Moreover, the length of the extension could be less than we request. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or the term of any such extension is less than we request, the period during which we can enforce our patent rights for that product will be shortened and our competitors may obtain approval to market competing products sooner. As a result, our revenue from applicable products could be reduced, possibly materially.

We enjoy only limited geographical protection with respect to certain patents and may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Patents are of national or regional effect. While we will endeavor to try to protect our technologies, products and product candidates with intellectual property rights such as patents, as appropriate, the process of obtaining patents is time-consuming, expensive and sometimes unpredictable in other countries. As such, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions.

International applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, or PCT, are usually filed within 12 months after the priority filing. Based on the PCT filing, national and regional patent applications may be filed in additional jurisdictions where we believe our product candidates may be marketed. We have so far not filed for patent protection in all national and regional jurisdictions where such protection may be available. Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on all of our research programs and product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States can be less extensive than those in the United States. In addition, we may decide to abandon national and regional patent applications before grant. Finally, the grant proceeding of each national/regional patent is an independent proceeding which may lead to situations in which applications might in some jurisdictions be refused by the relevant patent offices, while granted by others. Further, the standards applied by the USPTO and foreign patent offices in granting patents are not always applied uniformly or predictably. It is common that depending on the country, the scope of patent protection may vary for the same product candidate and/or technology. As such, we do not know the degree of future protection that we will have on our technologies and product candidates.

Competitors may use our or our collaboration partners’ technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we or our collaboration partners have patent protection, but enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with our product candidates, and our or our collaboration partners’ patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.

The laws of some jurisdictions, particularly certain developing countries, do not protect intellectual property rights, particularly those relating to pharmaceuticals or biologics, to the same extent as laws in the United States, and many companies have encountered significant difficulties in protecting and defending such rights in such jurisdictions. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions. If we encounter difficulties in protecting, or are otherwise precluded from effectively protecting, the intellectual property rights important for our business in such jurisdictions, the value of these rights may be diminished and we may face additional competition from others in those jurisdictions.

Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.

Some countries, including China and India, have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. In addition, some countries limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of such patent. If we are forced to grant a license to third parties with respect to any patents relevant to our business, our competitive position may be impaired and our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.

We may become subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of our patents and other intellectual property.

We may be subject to claims that former employees, consultants, independent contractors, collaborators or other third parties have an interest in our patents or other intellectual property as an owner, co-owner, inventor or co-inventor. The failure to name the proper inventors on a patent application can result in the patents issuing thereon being unenforceable. Inventorship disputes may arise from conflicting views regarding the contributions of different individuals named as inventors, the effects of foreign laws where foreign nationals are involved in the development of the subject matter of the patent, conflicting obligations of third parties involved in developing our product candidates or as a result of questions regarding co-ownership of potential joint inventions. Litigation may be necessary to resolve these and other claims challenging inventorship and/or ownership. Alternatively, or additionally, we may enter into agreements to clarify the scope of our rights in such intellectual property. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, valuable intellectual property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

Intellectual property rights do not necessarily address all potential threats to our competitive advantage.

The degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual property rights is uncertain because intellectual property rights have limitations, and may not adequately protect our business, or permit us to maintain our competitive advantage. The following examples are illustrative:

•

others may be able to make product candidates similar to our product candidates but that are not covered by the claims of the patents that we own or have exclusively licensed;

•

the patents of third parties may have an adverse effect on our business;

•

we or any future strategic partners might not have been the first to conceive or reduce to practice the inventions covered by the issued patent or pending patent application that we own or have exclusively licensed;

•

we or any future strategic partners might not have been the first to file patent applications covering certain of our inventions;

•

others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies without infringing our intellectual property rights;

•

it is possible that our pending patent applications will not lead to issued patents;

•

issued patents that we own or have exclusively licensed may not provide us with any competitive advantage, or may be held invalid or unenforceable, as a result of legal challenges by our competitors;

•

we cannot predict the degree and range of protection any issued patents will afford us against competitors, whether or not others will obtain patents claiming aspects similar to those covered by our patents and patent applications, or whether we will need to initiate litigation or administrative proceedings which may be costly whether we win or lose;

•

our competitors might conduct research and development activities in countries where we do not have patent rights and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in our major commercial markets;

•

third parties performing manufacturing or testing for us using our product candidates or technologies could use the intellectual property of others without obtaining a proper license; and

•

we may not develop additional technologies that are patentable.

Should any of these events occur, they could significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects.

Composition of matter patents for biological and pharmaceutical products such as our product candidates are generally considered to be the strongest form of intellectual property protection for those types of products, as such patents provide protection without regard to any method of use. We cannot be certain that the claims in our pending patent applications covering composition of matter of our product candidates will be considered patentable by the USPTO or by patent offices in foreign countries, or that the claims in any of our issued patents will be considered valid and enforceable by courts in the United States or foreign countries. Method of use patents protect the use of a product for the specified method. This type of patent does not prevent a competitor from making and marketing a product that is identical to our product for an indication that is outside the scope of the patented method. Moreover, even if competitors do not actively promote their product for our targeted indications, physicians may prescribe these products “off-label.” Although off-label prescriptions may infringe or contribute to the infringement of method of use patents, the practice is common and such infringement is difficult to prevent or prosecute.

Changes in patent laws or patent jurisprudence could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our product candidates.

As is the case with other biopharmaceutical companies, our success is heavily dependent on intellectual property, particularly patents. Obtaining and enforcing patents in the biopharmaceutical industry involve both technological complexity and legal complexity. Recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings have narrowed the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances and weakened the rights of patent owners in certain situations. Therefore, obtaining and enforcing biopharmaceutical patents is costly, time-consuming and inherently uncertain.

In September 2011, the America Invents Act, or the AIA, was enacted in the United States, resulting in significant changes to the U.S. patent system. An important change introduced by the AIA was a transition to a “first-to-file” system for deciding which party should be granted a patent when two or more patent applications are filed by different parties claiming the same invention, which went into effect on March 16, 2013. Therefore, a third party that now files a patent application in the USPTO before we do could be awarded a patent covering an invention of ours even if we created the invention before it was created by the third party. While we are cognizant of the time from invention to filing of a patent application, circumstances could prevent us from promptly filing patent applications for our inventions.

Among some of the other changes introduced by the AIA were changes that limit where a patentee may file a patent infringement suit and providing opportunities for third parties to challenge any issued patent in the USPTO. This applies to all of our U.S. patents, even those issued before March 16, 2013. Because of a lower evidentiary standard in USPTO proceedings compared to the evidentiary standard in U.S. federal courts necessary to invalidate a patent claim, a third party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceeding sufficient for the USPTO to hold a claim invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if first presented in a district court action. Accordingly, a third party may attempt to use the USPTO procedures to invalidate our patent claims that would not have been invalidated if first challenged by the third party as a defendant in a district court action. The AIA and its continued implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications, and the patent applications of our collaborators, and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents.

Depending on decisions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that could weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce our existing patents and patents that we might obtain in the future. For example, in the recent case, Assoc. for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain claims to DNA molecules are not patentable. While we do not believe that any of the patents owned or licensed by us will be found invalid based on this decision, we cannot predict how future decisions by the courts, the U.S. Congress or the USPTO may impact the value of our patents. Similarly, there is complexity and uncertainty related to European patent laws. For example, the European Patent Convention was amended in April 2010 to limit the time permitted for filing divisional applications. In addition, the European Patent Convention patent system is relatively stringent in the type of amendments that are allowed during prosecution. These limitations and requirements could adversely affect our ability to obtain new patents in the future that may be important for our business.

We may rely on trade secret and proprietary know-how, which can be difficult to trace and enforce and, if we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.

In addition to seeking patents for some of our technology and product candidates, we may rely on trade secrets and/or confidential know-how to protect our technology, especially where patent protection is believed to be of limited value, to maintain our competitive position with respect to our research programs and product candidates. Elements of our product candidates, including processes for their preparation and manufacture, may involve proprietary know-how, information, or technology that is not covered by patents, and thus for these aspects we may consider trade secrets and know-how to be our primary intellectual property. Any disclosure, either intentional or unintentional, by our employees or by other third parties of our trade secrets or proprietary information could enable competitors to duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thus adversely eroding our competitive position in our market.

Trade secrets and/or confidential know-how can be difficult to protect or maintain as confidential. To protect this type of information against disclosure or appropriation by competitors, our policy is to require our employees, consultants, contractors, collaborators, advisors and other third parties to enter into confidentiality agreements with us. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may unintentionally or willfully breach the agreements and disclose our confidential information, and confidentiality agreements may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. Monitoring unauthorized uses and disclosures is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to protect our proprietary technologies will be effective. Enforcing a claim that a third party obtained illegally and is using trade secrets and/or confidential know-how is also expensive, time consuming and unpredictable. The enforceability of confidentiality agreements may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent or in the same manner as the laws of the United States. As a result, we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property both in the United States and abroad. Furthermore, if a competitor lawfully obtained or independently developed any of our trade secrets, we would have no right to prevent such competitor from using that technology or information to compete with us, which could harm our competitive position. Additionally, if the steps taken to maintain our trade secrets are deemed

inadequate, we may have insufficient recourse against third parties for misappropriating the trade secret. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets or other proprietary information.

Trade secrets can over time be disseminated within the industry through independent development, the publication of journal articles and the movement of personnel skilled in the art from company to company or academic to industry scientific positions. Though our agreements with third parties typically restrict the ability of our employees, consultants, contractors, collaborators, advisors and other third parties to publish data potentially relating to our trade secrets, our agreements may contain certain limited publication rights. Because from time to time we expect to rely on third parties in the development, manufacture and distribution of our product candidates and provision of our services, we must, at times, share trade secrets with them. Despite employing the contractual and other security precautions described above, the need to share trade secrets increases the risk that such trade secrets become known by our competitors, are inadvertently incorporated into the technology of others, or are disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, we would have no right to prevent them from using that technology or information to compete with us. If any of our trade secrets were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, our competitive position would be harmed.

In addition, our competitors may independently develop substantially equivalent trade secrets, proprietary information or know-how and may even apply for patent protection in respect of the same. If successful in obtaining such patent protection, our competitors could limit our use of our trade secrets and/or confidential know-how. Under certain circumstances and to guarantee our freedom to operate, we may also decide to publish some know-how to prevent others from obtaining patent rights covering such know-how.

We may be subject to third-party claims asserting that our employees, consultants, contractors, collaborators or advisors have misappropriated or wrongfully used or disseminated their intellectual property or claiming ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual property.

Many of our employees, including our senior management, were previously employed at universities or at other biopharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Some of these employees executed proprietary rights, non-disclosure and non-competition agreements in connection with such previous employment. Similarly, we work with consultants, contractors, collaborators, advisors or other third parties who have worked with, and do currently work with, other companies, including our competitors or potential competitors, and have executed proprietary rights, non-disclosure and non-competition agreements in connection with such other companies. Although we try to ensure that our employees, consultants, contractors, collaborators, advisors or other third parties do not use or disclose the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or these employees or individuals that we work with have used or disclosed confidential information or intellectual property of others, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, or that we caused an individual to breach the terms of his or her non-competition or non-solicitation agreement with a current or former employer or competitor.

Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims and, even if we are successful, could result in substantial costs and could be a distraction to management, our employees and our routine business. If we fail in prosecuting or defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel or sustain damages. Such intellectual property rights could be awarded to a third party, and we could be required to obtain a license from such third party to develop or commercialize our technology or product candidates. Such a license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Moreover, any such litigation or the threat thereof may adversely affect our reputation and our ability to form strategic alliances or sublicense our rights to collaborators, engage with scientific advisors or hire employees or consultants, each of which would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance and annuity fees on any issued patent are due to be paid to the USPTO and foreign patent agencies in several stages over the lifetime of the patent. The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. While an inadvertent lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Non-compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. If we fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our product candidates, our competitors might be able to enter the market, which would have an adverse effect on our business.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Our stock price may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, resulting in substantial losses for investors.

The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile and may fluctuate substantially as a result of a variety of factors, some of which are related in complex ways. Since shares of our common stock were sold in our initial public offering in February 2019 at a price of $14.00 per share, the reported low and high sales prices of our common stock through July 28, 2023 have ranged from $0.55 to $25.24, respectively.

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the factors listed below and other factors describe in this “Risk Factors” section:

•

the anticipated results of our Phase 1 trial of HPN217, Phase 1/2 trial of HPN328, and any other future preclinical studies and clinical trials and trials we may conduct, or changes in the development status of our product candidates;

•

any delay in our regulatory filings for our product candidates and any adverse development or perceived adverse development with respect to the applicable regulatory authority’s review of such filings, including without limitation the issuance by the FDA of a “refusal to file” letter or a request for additional information;

•

adverse results or delays in clinical trials;

•

our decision to initiate a preclinical study or clinical trial, not to initiate a preclinical study or clinical trial or to terminate an existing clinical study or trial;

•

adverse actions taken by regulatory agencies with respect to our preclinical studies or clinical trials, manufacturing supply chain or sales and marketing activities, including failure to receive regulatory approval of our product candidates;

•

our cash position and the methods by which we seek financing;

•

changes in laws or regulations, including but not limited to preclinical study or clinical trial requirements for approvals;

•

any adverse changes to our relationship with manufacturers or suppliers;

•

manufacturing, supply or distribution shortages;

•

litigation involving us, our industry or both, or investigations by regulators into our operations or those of our competitors;

•

our failure to commercialize our product candidates;

•

additions or departures of key scientific or management personnel;

•

unanticipated serious safety concerns related to the use of our product candidates;

•

disputes or other developments relating to proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters and our ability to obtain patent protection for our technologies;

•

variations in our results of operations;

•

our failure to meet the estimates and projections of the investment community or that we may otherwise provide to the public;

•

publication of research reports about us or our industry, or immuno-oncology in particular, or positive or negative recommendations or withdrawal of research coverage by securities analysts;

•

announcements made by us or our competitors of new product and service offerings, acquisitions, strategic relationships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

•

our ability to establish collaborations, including a partnership arrangement for the further development of our HPN536 program;

•

our ability to effectively manage our growth;

•

the size of our initial cancer target markets;

•

our ability to successfully treat additional types of cancers or at different stages;

•

changes in the market valuations of similar companies;

•

press reports, whether or not true, about our business;

•

sales or perceived potential sales of our common stock by us or our stockholders in the future;

•

overall fluctuations in the equity markets;

•

ineffectiveness of our internal controls;

•

the effects of the recent and other potential corporate restructurings;

•

changes in accounting practices or principles;

•

changes or developments in the global regulatory environment;

•

general political and economic conditions, such as the geopolitical instability resulting from the conflict between Russia and Ukraine or historically high inflation;

•

the impact of public health epidemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic;

•

economic weakness, including inflation, increased interest rates, recent and potential future bank failures, or any effects from a local or global recession or depression that may depress economic conditions for a prolonged period; and

•

other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.

In addition, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many biopharmaceutical companies. Stock prices of many biopharmaceutical companies have fluctuated in a manner unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, it could subject us to substantial costs, divert resources and the attention of management from our business and adversely affect, our business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.

Our common stock currently trades on The Nasdaq Global Select Market. The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, or Nasdaq, has requirements that a company must meet in order to remain listed on Nasdaq. For example, Nasdaq rules require us to maintain a minimum closing bid price of $1.00 per share of our common stock and a stockholders’ equity minimum of at least $10.0 million.

On March 29, 2023, we received a letter from Nasdaq Staff notifying us that the bid price of our common stock had closed below $1.00 per share for the last 30 consecutive business days and we had 180 calendar days to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. If compliance is not regained September 25, 2023, unless Nasdaq Staff exercises its discretion to extend this period, our common stock may be subject to a delisting action by Nasdaq. A reverse stock split may allow us to meet the minimum bid price requirement, and while we received stockholder approval for a reverse stock split at our annual meeting of stockholders on June 22, 2023, we cannot assure you that any reverse stock split, if implemented, will be sufficient to enable us to maintain our Nasdaq listing. Additionally, if a reverse stock split is implemented, there can be no assurance that the market price per new share of our common stock following the reverse stock split will remain unchanged or will increase in proportion to the reduction in the number of old shares of our common stock outstanding before the reverse stock split. The liquidity of the shares of our common stock may be affected adversely by any reverse stock split given the reduced number of shares of our common stock that will be outstanding following the reverse stock split. Furthermore, following any reverse stock split, the resulting market price of our common stock may not attract new investors and may not satisfy the investing requirements of those investors.

On March 30, 2023, we received a notification letter from Nasdaq Staff, or the Stockholders’ Equity Notice, indicating that our stockholders’ equity of $5.4 million as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, does not satisfy Nasdaq’s continued listing requirement set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(A) to maintain a minimum of $10.0 million in stockholders’ equity. As of June 30, 2023, our stockholders’ equity was $3.0 million. We had 45 calendar days from the date of the Stockholders’ Equity Notice to submit to Nasdaq a plan to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(A) and we submitted such plan on May 15, 2023.

On June 7, 2023, Nasdaq granted us an extension to September 26, 2023 for us to provide evidence of compliance. In connection with this extension, we will file an application to transfer from the Nasdaq Global Market to the Nasdaq Capital Market concurrently with the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. If we are not able to regain compliance by September 26, 2023, we will then consider actions appropriate to the circumstances, which may include applicable appeals to a Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel.

If our common stock is delisted from Nasdaq, as a result of our failure to comply with either the minimum bid price requirement or the stockholders’ equity requirement, as a result of Nasdaq not granting us an extension or the panel not granting us a favorable decision, or due to our failure to continue to comply with any other requirement for continued listing on Nasdaq, the liquidity of our common stock would be adversely affected, and the market price of our common stock could decrease. It may be difficult for us to raise additional capital if we are not listed on a national exchange.

Holders of our preferred stock may have interests and rights that are different from our common stockholders.

We are permitted under our certificate of incorporation to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. We can issue shares of our preferred stock in one or more series and can set the terms of the preferred stock without seeking any further approval from our common stockholders. Any preferred stock that we issue may rank ahead of our common stock in terms of dividend priority or liquidation premiums and may have greater voting rights than our common stock, which could dilute the value of our common stock to current stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

In March 2023, we raised $25.0 million in additional capital through a Private Placement pursuant to which we sold 25,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 7,485,762 shares of common stock to investors. We are required to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock at certain specified times and upon the occurrence of certain specified events, including upon the receipt of proceeds in connection with certain strategic transactions, at the applicable redemption price set forth in the certificate of designation of the Series A Preferred Stock, or the Certificates of Designation. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company, the holders of Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive, in preference to the holders of any other capital stock, an amount per share equal to the greater of (i) $1,000 multiplied by 3.5 (or 4.5 from and after the 18 month anniversary of the closing of the Private Placement) plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, if any, and (ii) the amount a holder of Series A Preferred Stock would have been entitled to receive had such holder exchanged the share of Series A Preferred Stock for a number of shares of common stock equal to (x) 1,000 plus all accrued but unpaid dividends, divided by (y) the “Minimum Price” as defined in Nasdaq Rule 5635(d). Additionally, as long as there is at least 2,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding, unless we have received the consent of the Requisite Holders (as defined in the Certificate of Designation), we are prohibited from taking certain actions, including, among other things, subject to certain exceptions, authorizing or issuing any securities senior to the Series A Preferred Stock, actions that would impede our ability to make required redemptions of the Series A Preferred Stock, incur indebtedness, transfer or license certain assets, and redeem or repurchase shares of our capital stock. In addition, holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, when, as, and if declared by our board of directors, dividends that accrue on a day-to-day basis until paid at a rate of 8.000% per year on the stated value of $1,000 per share of Series A Preferred Stock, and unless full cumulative dividends have been paid, we may not declare or pay any dividends on any junior securities, including our common stock.

Our principal stockholders and management own a significant percentage of our stock and will be able to exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.

As of July 31, 2023, our executive officers, directors, holders of 5% or more of our capital stock and their respective affiliates owned approximately 74.9% of our outstanding voting common stock, and approximately 70% of our outstanding Series A Preferred Stock. While these stockholders collectively own less than a majority of our voting stock, these stockholders will nevertheless continue to have significant influence over matters requiring stockholder approval. Therefore, these stockholders will have the ability to influence us through this ownership position. For example, these stockholders may be able to significantly influence elections of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, or approval of any merger, sale of assets, or other major corporate transaction. Additionally, holders of our Series A Preferred Stock have consent rights with respect to certain actions, limiting our ability to enter into certain change in control, liquidation or licensing transactions, or incur indebtedness without their approval. This may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our common stock that you may feel are in your best interest as one of our stockholders.

Sales of substantial amounts of our outstanding common stock in the public market could cause our common stock price to fall.

Our common stock price could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of common stock or the perception that these sales could occur. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, might also make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate.

In addition, in connection with the Private Placement, we issued warrants to purchase up to 7,485,762 shares of common stock. To the extent these warrants are exercised, our stockholders would be diluted, and the price of our common stock may decline.

In addition, in the future, we may issue shares of common stock, or other equity or debt securities convertible into common stock, in connection with a financing, acquisition, employee arrangement or otherwise. Any such issuance, including pursuant to our Sales Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald, could result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders and could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

If we are unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, it could result in material misstatements in our financial statements and cause investors to lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, either of which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. We are required to document, review and improve our

internal controls and procedures for compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires annual management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, the accuracy and timing of our financial reporting, and our stock price, may be adversely affected and we may be unable to maintain compliance with the applicable stock exchange listing requirements.

Implementing any appropriate changes to our internal controls may distract our officers and employees, entail substantial costs to modify our existing processes and take significant time to complete. These changes may not, however, be effective in maintaining the adequacy of our internal controls, and any failure to maintain that adequacy, or consequent inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, could increase our operating costs and harm our business. In addition, investors’ perceptions that our internal controls are inadequate or that we are unable to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis may harm our stock price.

We are an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company, and any decision on our part to comply only with applicable reduced reporting and disclosure requirements could make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act and, for as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may choose to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies but not to emerging growth companies, including:

•

not being required to have our independent registered public accounting firm audit our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;

•

reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and annual report on Form 10-K; and

•

exemptions from the requirements of holding non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

•

We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years following the completion of our initial public offering. Our status as an emerging growth company will end as soon as any of the following takes place:

•

the last day of the fiscal year in which we have more than $1.235 billion in gross annual revenue;

•

the date we qualify as a “large accelerated filer,” with at least $700 million of equity securities held by non-affiliates;

•

the date on which we have issued, in any three-year period, more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities; or

•

the last day of the fiscal year ending after the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering, which is December 31, 2024.

We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive if we choose to rely on any of the exemptions afforded to emerging growth companies. If some investors find our common stock less attractive because we rely on any of these exemptions, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and the market price of our common stock may be more volatile.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We elected to use this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until the earlier of the date that we (i) are no longer an emerging growth company or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period provided in the JOBS Act. As a result, these financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with the new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates.

We are also a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company even after we are no longer an emerging growth company. We may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures available to smaller reporting companies and will be able to take advantage of these scaled disclosures for so long as our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250.0 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter, or our annual revenue is less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter.

We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and, consequently, our common stockholders’ ability to achieve a return on their investment will depend on appreciation of the value of our common stock.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock; however, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, when, as, and if declared by our board of directors, 8.000% annual dividends payments. We do not intend to

declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. As a result, any investment return on our common stock will depend upon increases in the value for our common stock, which is not certain. Furthermore, while we currently intend to retain all our available funds and any future earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and development of our business, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to certain redemption rights upon the receipt of proceeds in connection with certain strategic and licensing transactions. As a result of this and of the liquidation and dividend preferences of the Series A Preferred Stock, any investment return on our common stock may be diminished.

Delaware law and provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, could make a merger, tender offer or proxy contest difficult, thereby depressing the trading price of our common stock.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could depress the trading price of our common stock by acting to discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in our management that our stockholders may deem advantageous. These provisions include the following:

•

establish a classified board of directors so that not all members of our board of directors are elected at one time;

•

permit our board of directors to establish the number of directors and fill any vacancies and newly created directorships;

•

provide that the members of our board of directors may only be removed for cause;

•

require super-majority voting to amend certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws;

•

authorize the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that our board of directors could use to implement a stockholder rights plan;

•

eliminate the ability of our stockholders to call special stockholder meetings;

•

prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which requires all stockholder actions to be taken at stockholder meetings;

•

provide that our board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal our amended and restated bylaws;

•

restrict the forum for certain litigation against us to Delaware; and

•

establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at annual stockholder meetings.

Any provision of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our amended and restated bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in our control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for certain disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if and only if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware lacks subject matter jurisdiction, any state court located within the State of Delaware or, if and only if all such state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware), to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, is the exclusive forum for:

•

any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf;

•

any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty;

•

any action asserting a claim against us arising under the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws; and

•

any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal-affairs doctrine.

However, this exclusive forum provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act. Furthermore, this provision applies to Securities Act claims and Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Accordingly, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provision, and our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. While the Delaware courts have determined that such choice of forum provisions are facially valid, a stockholder may nevertheless seek to bring a claim in a venue other than those designated in the exclusive forum provision. In such instance, we would expect to vigorously assert

the validity and enforceability of the exclusive forum provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. This may require significant additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions and there can be no assurance that the provision will be enforced by a court in those other jurisdictions.

This exclusive-forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. If a court were to find the exclusive forum provision in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur further significant additional costs associated with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions, all of which could seriously harm our business.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes may be limited.

Our U.S. net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards are potentially subject to annual utilization limits under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. Our U.S. NOL carryforwards arising in taxable years beginning prior to 2018 and tax credit carryforwards could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future taxable income or income tax liabilities because of their limited duration or because of restrictions under U.S. tax law. Our U.S. NOL carryforwards arising in taxable years beginning after 2017 carry forward indefinitely but are subject to limitations in taxable years beginning after 2020. Under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in its equity ownership by certain stockholders during a rolling three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change tax attributes, such as NOLs and R&D tax credits, to offset its post-change income or taxes may be limited. We have not performed an analysis under Section 382 of the Code and cannot predict or otherwise determine whether our federal tax attribute carryforwards may be limited in the future. As a result, if we earn taxable income in the future, our ability to use existing U.S. NOL and R&D tax credit carryforwards to reduce U.S. taxable income or tax liability may be subject to limitations. This could adversely impact our future operating results by increasing our future tax liabilities. Similar rules may also limit our ability to use accumulated state tax attributes to reduce our state tax liabilities. Also, there may be periods when the use of NOLs is suspended or otherwise limited at the state level, which could accelerate or permanently increase state taxes owed.

We may have ownership changes in the future, due to further changes in our stock ownership. Some of these ownership changes could be outside of our control. If an ownership change occurs and our ability to use our historical NOL and tax credit carryforwards is limited, it could adversely impact our future operating results by increasing our tax obligations.

General Risk Factors

Adverse developments affecting the financial services industry may have adverse consequences on our business, financial condition and stock price.

We maintain cash balances at third-party financial institutions in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. Although we assess our banking relationships as we believe necessary or appropriate, our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our current and projected future business operations could be significantly impaired by factors that affect us, the financial institutions with which we have arrangements directly, or the financial services industry or economy in general. These factors could involve financial institutions or financial services industry companies with which we have financial or business relationships but could also include factors involving financial markets or the financial services industry generally.

Risks from improper conduct by our employees, agents, contractors or collaborators could adversely affect our reputation, business, prospects, operating results and financial condition.

We cannot ensure that our compliance controls, policies and procedures will in every instance protect us from acts committed by our employees, agents, contractors or collaborators that would violate the laws or regulations of the jurisdictions in which we operate, including, without limitation, employment, foreign corrupt practices, trade restrictions and sanctions, environmental, competition and patient privacy and other privacy laws and regulations. Such improper actions could subject us to civil or criminal investigations and monetary and injunctive penalties, and could adversely impact our ability to conduct business, operating results and reputation.

We are subject to a number of anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, and the U.K. Bribery Act. Our failure to comply with anti-corruption laws applicable to us could result in penalties, which could harm our reputation and harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects. The FCPA generally prohibits companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business and/or other benefits. The FCPA also requires public companies to maintain accurate books and records and devise a system of sufficient internal accounting controls. We regularly review and update our policies and procedures and internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that we, our employees, distributors and other intermediaries comply with the anti-corruption laws to

which we are subject. However, there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any policies, procedures and internal controls, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the policies, procedures and internal controls. There can be no assurance that such policies or procedures or internal controls will work effectively at all times or protect us against liability under these or other laws for actions taken by our employees, distributors and other intermediaries with respect to our business.

The SEC, and the Department of Justice continue to view FCPA enforcement activities as a high priority. There is no certainty that all of our employees, agents, contractors or collaborators, or those of our affiliates, will comply with all applicable laws and regulations, particularly given the high level of complexity of these laws. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines, criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, requirements to obtain export licenses, cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries, implementation of compliance programs and prohibitions on the conduct of our business. Any such violations could materially damage our reputation, our brand, our international operations, our ability to attract and retain employees, and our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition.

Use of social media could give rise to liability, breaches of data security, or reputational harm.

We and our employees use social media to communicate externally. There is risk that the use of social media by us or our employees to communicate about our product candidates or business may give rise to liability, lead to the loss of trade secrets or other intellectual property, or result in public exposure of personal information of our employees, clinical trial patients, customers, and others. Furthermore, negative posts or comments about us or our product candidates in social media could seriously damage our reputation, brand image, and goodwill. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition and could adversely affect the price of our common stock.

If our information technology systems or data, or those of third parties upon whom we rely, are or were compromised, we could experience adverse consequences resulting from such compromise, including but not limited to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions of our business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; and other adverse consequences.

In the ordinary course of our business, we may collect, store, use, transmit, disclose, or otherwise process proprietary, confidential and sensitive data, including personal information (such as health-related data), intellectual property, and trade secrets. We are increasingly dependent upon information technology systems, infrastructure, and data to operate our business, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. We also rely on third-party service providers and technologies to operate our business. parties and their information technology systems. Our ability to monitor these third parties’ cybersecurity practices is limited, and these third parties may not have adequate information security measures in place.

Cyber-attacks, malicious internet-based activity, online and offline fraud, and other similar activities threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our sensitive information and information technology systems, and those of the third parties upon which we rely. Such threats are prevalent and continue to rise, are increasingly difficult to detect, and come from a variety of sources, including traditional computer “hackers,” threat actors, “hacktivists,” organized criminal threat actors, personnel (such as through theft or misuse), sophisticated nation states, and nation-state-supported actors. Some actors now engage and are expected to continue to engage in cyber-attacks, including without limitation nation-state actors for geopolitical reasons and in conjunction with military conflicts and defense activities. During times of war and other major conflicts, we and the third parties upon which we rely may be vulnerable to a heightened risk of these attacks, including retaliatory cyber-attacks, that could materially disrupt our systems and operations, supply chain, and ability to produce, sell and distribute our goods and services.

We and the third parties upon which we rely are subject to a variety of evolving threats, including but not limited to social-engineering attacks (including through phishing attacks), malicious code (such as viruses and worms), malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions), denial-of-service attacks (such as credential stuffing), credential harvesting, personnel misconduct or error, ransomware attacks, supply-chain attacks, software bugs, server malfunctions, software or hardware failures, loss of data or other information technology assets, adware, telecommunications failures, earthquakes, fires, floods, and other similar threats. In particular, severe ransomware attacks are becoming increasingly prevalent and can lead to significant interruptions in our operations, loss of sensitive data and income, reputational harm, and diversion of funds. Extortion payments may alleviate the negative impact of a ransomware attack, but we may be unwilling or unable to make such payments due to, for example, applicable laws or regulations prohibiting such payments.

Any of the previously identified or similar threats could cause a security incident or other interruption, which could result in the unauthorized, unlawful or accidental acquisition, modification, destruction, loss, alteration, encryption, disclosure of, or access to data, including clinical trial data. We may be unable to anticipate or there is a risk that an attack may remain undetected for a period of time. As the cyber-threat landscape evolves, these threats are increasing in frequency, sophistication and intensity and are likely to become increasingly difficult to detect. We may expend significant resources or modify our business activities (including our clinical trial activities) in an effort to protect against security incidents and other interruptions. However, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective.

Applicable data privacy and security obligations may require us to notify relevant stakeholders of security incidents. Such disclosures are costly, and the disclosures or the failure to comply with such requirements could lead to adverse consequences. Furthermore, if we (or a third party upon whom we rely) experience a security incident, we may experience adverse consequences, such as government enforcement actions (for example, investigations, fines, penalties, audits, and inspections); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; restrictions on processing data (including personal information); litigation (including class claims); indemnification obligations; negative publicity; reputational harm; monetary fund diversions; interruptions in our operations (for example, due to data integrity, availability or confidentiality issues); financial loss; diverted management attention; and other similar harms.

A security incident may cause us to breach our contracts. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the limitations of liability in our contracts would be enforceable or adequate or would otherwise protect us from liabilities or damages.

We cannot be sure that our insurance coverage will be adequate to protect us from or to mitigate liabilities arising out of our privacy and cybersecurity practices, that such coverage will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or that such coverage will pay future claims.

If securities or industry analysts either do not publish research about us or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about us, our business or our market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our common stock adversely, the trading price or trading volume of our common stock could decline.

The trading market for our common stock is influenced in part by the research and reports that securities or industry analysts may publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors. If one or more of these analysts initiate research with an unfavorable rating or downgrade our common stock, provide a more favorable recommendation about our competitors or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our common stock price would likely decline. If any analyst who may cover us were to cease coverage of us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the trading price or trading volume of our common stock to decline.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

EXHIBIT INDEX

Number

Exhibit Description

Form

File No.

Exhibit

Filing Date

Filed

Herewith

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant

10-Q

001-38800

3.1

8/5/2019

3.2

Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of 8.000% Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock

8-K

001-38800

3.1

3/27/2023

3.3

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant

8-K

001-38800

3.2

2/13/2019

4.1

Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant

8-K

001-38800

4.2

3/27/2023

4.2

Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Registrant and the investors named therein, dated as of March 22, 2023

8-K

001-38800

10.2

3/27/2023

31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1†

Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Linkbase Document

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Labels Linkbase Document

101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

104

The cover page for the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q has been formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101

† The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 that accompany this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

+ Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 9, 2023


HARPOON THERAPEUTICS, INC.

By:	/s/ Julie Eastland
	Julie Eastland President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)


By:	/s/ Frank Lanza
	Frank Lanza
	Corporate Controller (Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)