HAYNES INTERNATIONAL INC - Quarter Report: 2013 March (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-33288

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		06-1185400 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1020 West Park Avenue, Kokomo, Indiana (Address of principal executive offices)		46904-9013 (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (765) 456-6000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share		NASDAQ Global Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filler” and “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes o No x

As of May 1, 2013, the registrant had 12,332,592 shares of Common Stock, $.001 par value, outstanding.

Table of Contents

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
	Haynes International, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

	Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2013	1

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2013	2

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2013	3

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2013	4

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	23

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	23

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	24

Item 6.	Exhibits	24

	Signatures	25

	Index to Exhibits	26

Table of Contents

PART 1 FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	September 30, 2012			March 31, 2013
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	46,740		$	48,011
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,249 and $1,158 respectively	100,631			86,454
Inventories	263,236			262,715
Income taxes receivable	4,153			3,329
Deferred income taxes	9,933			9,749
Other current assets	1,532			2,306
Total current assets	426,225			412,564
Property, plant and equipment, net	124,652			141,743
Deferred income taxes—long term portion	68,255			67,165
Prepayments and deferred charges	1,777			1,820
Intangible assets, net	6,017			5,809
Total assets	$	626,926		$	629,101
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	37,471		$	38,103
Accrued expenses	15,157			14,278
Revolving credit facility	—			—
Accrued pension and postretirement benefits	21,065			21,065
Deferred revenue—current portion	2,500			2,500
Total current liabilities	76,193			75,946
Long-term obligations (less current portion)	980			980
Deferred revenue (less current portion)	32,829			31,579
Non-current income taxes payable	339			339
Accrued pension and postretirement benefits	215,487			213,412
Total liabilities	325,828			322,256
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)	—			—
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value (40,000,000 shares authorized, 12,287,790 and 12,342,985 shares issued, and 12,287,790 and 12,332,992 outstanding at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2013, respectively)	12			12
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value (20,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding)	—			—
Additional paid-in capital	236,751			238,555
Accumulated earnings	163,426			170,274
Treasury stock, 0 shares at September 30, 2012 and 9,993 shares at March 31, 2013	—			(505		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(99,091		)	(101,491		)
Total stockholders’ equity	301,098			306,845
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	626,926		$	629,101

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim financial statements.

Table of Contents

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2013			2012			2013

Net revenues	$	158,882		$	129,201		$	287,733		$	243,501
Cost of sales	124,347			109,117			229,707			204,643
Gross profit	34,535			20,084			58,026			38,858
Selling, general and administrative expense	10,687			9,414			20,503			19,225
Research and technical expense	814			852			1,579			1,710
Operating income	23,034			9,818			35,944			17,923
Interest income	(33		)	(25		)	(95		)	(54		)
Interest expense	24			17			50			34
Income before income taxes	23,043			9,826			35,989			17,943
Provision for income taxes	7,892			3,390			12,395			5,672
Net income	$	15,151		$	6,436		$	23,594		$	12,271
Net income per share:
Basic	$	1.24		$	0.52		$	1.93		$	1.00
Diluted	$	1.23		$	0.52		$	1.92		$	0.99

Dividend declared per common share	$	0.22		$	0.22		$	0.44		$	0.44

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim financial statements.

Table of Contents

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Three Months Ended March 31					Six Months Ended March 31
	2012		2013			2012		2013
Net income	$	15,151	$	6,436		$	23,594	$	12,271
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment	1,624		(3,064		)	938		(2,400		)
Comprehensive income	$	16,775	$	3,372		$	24,532	$	9,871

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim financial statements.

Table of Contents

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	23,594		$	12,271
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation	6,092			6,437
Amortization	216			208
Pension and post-retirement expense - U.S. and U.K.	7,848			8,067
Stock compensation expense	1,042			712
Excess tax benefit from option exercises and restricted stock vesting	(1,122		)	(494		)
Deferred revenue	(1,250		)	(1,250		)
Deferred income taxes	1,449			656
Loss on disposal of property	65			135
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(4,612		)	12,917
Inventories	(23,200		)	(1,669		)
Other assets	(298		)	(827		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	1,602			19
Income taxes	5,772			1,966
Accrued pension and postretirement benefits	(10,565		)	(10,090		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	6,633			29,058

Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment	(12,690		)	(22,731		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(12,690		)	(22,731		)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Dividends paid	(5,397		)	(5,423		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	1,599			598
Payment for purchase of treasury stock	—			(505		)
Excess tax benefit from option exercises and restricted stock vesting	1,122			494
Net cash used in financing activities	(2,676		)	(4,836		)

Effect of exchange rates on cash	60			(220		)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(8,673		)	1,271

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	60,062			46,740
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	51,389		$	48,011

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during period for:
Interest (net of capitalized interest)	$	18		$	1
Income taxes paid (net of refunds)	$	5,188		$	2,904
Capital expenditures incurred but not yet paid	$	224		$	3,390

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim financial statements.

Table of Contents

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and such principles are applied on a basis consistent with information reflected in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC related to interim financial statements. In the opinion of management, the interim financial information includes all adjustments and accruals, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of results for the respective interim periods. The results of operations for the three or six months ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year ending September 30, 2013 or any interim period.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Haynes International, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated.

Note 2. New Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The standard revises the guidance for providing information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. It became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company adopted this accounting standard on January 1, 2013, and the impact to the consolidated financial statements was not material.

Note 3. Inventories

The following is a summary of the major classes of inventories:

	September 30, 2012		March 31, 2013
Raw Materials	$	27,654	$	27,777
Work-in-process	129,642		127,406
Finished Goods	104,875		106,418
Other	1,065		1,114
	$	263,236	$	262,715

Table of Contents

Note 4. Income Taxes

Income tax expense for the three and six months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013 differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to state income taxes and differing tax rates on foreign earnings. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was 34.5% compared to 34.2% in the same period of fiscal 2012. The effective tax rate for the six months ended March 31, 2013 was 31.6% compared to 34.4% in the same period of fiscal 2012. The decrease in the six month effective tax rate is attributable to a change in law in the state of California related to apportionment. This change resulted in an increase to the deferred tax asset which caused a favorable impact on the effective tax rate.

Note 5. Pension and Post-retirement Benefits

Components of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost for the three and six months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31,												Six Months Ended March 31,
	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits						Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	2012			2013			2012			2013			2012			2013			2012			2013
Service cost	$	1,000		$	1,220		$	73		$	97		$	2,001		$	2,440		$	146		$	194
Interest cost	2,872			2,657			1,145			1,082			5,548			5,195			2,290			2,164
Expected return	(2,899		)	(3,243		)	—			—			(5,565		)	(6,362		)	—			—
Amortizations	2,475			2,749			(747		)	(518		)	4,923			5,472			(1,495		)	(1,036		)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	3,448		$	3,383		$	471		$	661		$	6,907		$	6,745		$	941		$	1,322

The Company contributed $7,500 to Company sponsored domestic pension plans, $2,120 to its other post-retirement benefit plans and $473 to the U.K. pension plan for the six months ended March 31, 2013. The Company presently expects future contributions of $7,500 to its domestic pension plans, $2,880 to its other post-retirement benefit plans and $497 to the U.K. pension plan for the remainder of fiscal 2013.

Note 6. Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies

The Company is regularly involved in litigation, both as a plaintiff and as a defendant, relating to its business and operations, including environmental, commercial, employment and intellectual property matters. Future expenditures for environmental, employment, intellectual property and other legal matters cannot be determined with any degree of certainty; however, based on the facts presently known, management does not believe that such costs will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company is currently, and has in the past, been subject to claims involving personal injuries allegedly relating to its products. For example, the Company is presently involved in two actions involving welding rod-related injuries, which were filed in California state court against numerous manufacturers, including the Company, in May 2006 and February 2007, respectively, alleging that the welding-related products of the defendant manufacturers harmed the users of such products through the inhalation of welding fumes containing manganese. The Company believes that it has defenses to these allegations and that, if the Company were to be found liable, the cases would not have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

The Company has received permits from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, or IDEM, to close and to provide post-closure monitoring and care for certain areas at the Kokomo facility previously used for the storage and disposal of wastes, some of which are classified as hazardous under applicable regulations. Closure certification was received in fiscal 1988 for the South Landfill at the Kokomo facility and post-closure monitoring and care is ongoing there. Closure certification was received in fiscal 1999 for the North Landfill at the Kokomo facility and post-closure monitoring and care are permitted and ongoing there. In fiscal 2007, IDEM issued a single post-closure permit applicable to both the North and South Landfills, which contains monitoring and post-closure care requirements. In addition, IDEM required that a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, Facility Investigation, or RFI, be conducted in order to further evaluate one area of concern and one solid waste management unit. The RFI commenced in fiscal 2008 and is ongoing.

Table of Contents

The Company has also received permits from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, or NCDENR, to close and provide post-closure monitoring and care for the hazardous waste lagoon at its Mountain Home, North Carolina facility. The lagoon area has been closed and is currently undergoing post-closure monitoring and care. The Company is required to monitor groundwater and to continue post-closure maintenance of the former disposal areas at each site. As a result, the Company is aware of elevated levels of certain contaminants in the groundwater and additional corrective action by the Company could be required.

On August 3, 2012, the Company received an information request from the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The information requested relates to the Company’s compliance with laws relating to air quality, and the Company has responded to the request and is awaiting further communication from the agency.

As of September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2013, the Company has accrued $1,071 for post-closure monitoring and maintenance activities. Accruals for these costs are calculated by estimating the cost to monitor and maintain each post-closure site and multiplying that amount by the number of years remaining in the 30-year post-closure monitoring period referred to above. At each fiscal year end, or earlier if necessary, the Company evaluates the accuracy of the estimates for these monitoring and maintenance costs for the upcoming fiscal year. The accrual was based upon the undiscounted amount of the obligation of $1,254 which was then discounted using an appropriate discount rate.

Note 7. Deferred Revenue

On November 17, 2006, the Company entered into a twenty-year agreement to provide conversion services to Titanium Metals Corporation (“TIMET”) for up to ten million pounds of titanium metal annually. TIMET paid the Company a $50,000 up-front fee and will also pay the Company for its processing services to the extent TIMET places orders for such services during the term of the agreement (20 years) at prices established by the terms of the agreement. TIMET may exercise an option to have ten million additional pounds of titanium converted annually, provided that it offers to loan up to $12,000 to the Company for certain capital expenditures which may be required to expand capacity. In addition to the volume commitment, the Company has granted TIMET a security interest in its four-high steckel rolling mill, along with rights of access if the Company enters into bankruptcy or defaults on any financing arrangements. The Company has agreed not to manufacture titanium products (other than cold reduced titanium tubing). The Company has also agreed not to provide titanium conversion services to any entity other than TIMET for the term of the Conversion Services Agreement. The agreement contains certain default provisions which could result in contract termination and damages, including the Company being required to return the unearned portion of the upfront fee. The cash received of $50,000 is recognized in income on a straight-line basis over the 20-year term of the agreement. The portion of the upfront fee not recognized in income is shown as deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheet.

Note 8. Intangible Assets

The Company has patents, trademarks and other intangibles. As the patents have a definite life, they are amortized over lives ranging from two to fourteen years. The Company reviews patents for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a patent may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the patent asset is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset.

As the trademarks have an indefinite life, the Company tests them for impairment at least annually as of August 31 (the annual impairment testing date). If the carrying value exceeds the fair value (determined by calculating a fair value based upon a discounted cash flow of an assumed royalty rate), impairment of the trademark may exist, resulting in a charge to earnings to the extent of the impairment. No impairment was recognized in the year ended September 30, 2012 because the fair value exceeded the carrying values. The Company also has non-compete agreements with remaining lives of 2 to 3 years.

Amortization of the patents, non-competes and other intangibles was $104 and $103 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively, and $216 and $208 for the six months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Table of Contents

The following represents a summary of intangible assets at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2013:

September 30, 2012	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Carrying Amount
Patents	$	8,667	$	(6,891	)	$	1,776
Trademarks	3,800		—			3,800
Non-compete	1,090		(900		)	190
Other	330		(79		)	251
	$	13,887	$	(7,870	)	$	6,017

March 31, 2013	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Carrying Amount
Patents	$	8,667	$	(7,031	)	$	1,636
Trademarks	3,800		—			3,800
Non-compete	500		(345		)	155
Other	330		(112		)	218
	$	13,297	$	(7,488	)	$	5,809

Estimate of Aggregate Amortization Expense: Year Ended September 30,
2013 (remainder of fiscal year)		208
2014		416
2015		393
2016		332
2017		279

Note 9. Net Income Per Share

The Company accounts for earnings per share using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation that determines net income per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to participation rights in undistributed earnings. Non-vested restricted stock awards that include non-forfeitable rights to dividends are considered participating securities. Per share amounts are computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during each period. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share is similar to basic earnings per share, except the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive common shares had been issued.

Basic and diluted net income per share were computed as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands, except share and per share data)	2012			2013			2012			2013
Numerator:
Net income	$	15,151		$	6,436		$	23,594		$	12,271
Less amount allocable to participating securities	(136		)	(51		)	(212		)	(97		)
Net income available for basic shareholders	15,015			6,385			23,382			12,174
Adjustment for dilutive potential common shares	1			—			1			—
Net income available for diluted common shares	$	15,016		$	6,385		$	23,383		$	12,174
Denominator:
Weighted average shares - Basic	12,140,635			12,233,308			12,117,994			12,211,769
Adjustment for dilutive potential common shares	74,762			41,083			79,582			43,788
Weighted average shares - Diluted	12,215,397			12,274,391			12,197,576			12,255,557

Basic net income per share	$	1.24		$	0.52		$	1.93		$	1.00
Diluted net income per share	$	1.23		$	0.52		$	1.92		$	0.99

Number of stock option shares excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive	80,380			184,706			80,380			184,706

Table of Contents

Anti-dilutive shares with respect to outstanding stock options have been properly excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share.

Note 10. Stock-Based Compensation

Restricted Stock Plan

On February 23, 2009, the Company adopted a restricted stock plan that reserved 400,000 shares of common stock for issuance. Shares of restricted stock vest in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may set restrictions on certain grants based on the achievement of specific performance goals, and vesting of grants to participants may also be time-based.

Restricted stock grants are subject to forfeiture if employment or service terminates prior to the end of the vesting period or if the performance goal is not met, if applicable. The Company will assess, on an ongoing basis, the probability of whether the performance criteria will be achieved. The Company will recognize compensation expense over the performance period if it is deemed probable that the goal will be achieved. The fair value of the Company’s restricted stock is determined based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the grant date. The plan provides for the adjustment of the number of shares covered by an outstanding grant and the maximum number of shares of restricted stock that may be granted under the plan in the event of a stock split, extraordinary dividend or distribution or similar recapitalization event. Holders of outstanding shares of restricted stock are entitled to receive dividends on shares of common stock.

On November 20, 2012, November 26, 2012, and December 10, 2012, the Company granted 31,950, 3,000 and 1,100 shares, respectively, of restricted stock to certain key employees and non-employee directors. The shares of restricted stock granted to employees will vest on the third anniversary of their grant date, provided that (a) the recipient is still an employee of the Company and (b) the Company has met a three-year net income performance goal, if applicable. The shares of restricted stock granted to non-employee directors will vest on the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the date of grant or (b) the failure of such non-employee director to be re-elected at an annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company as a result of such non-employee director being excluded from the nominations for any reason other than cause. The fair value of the grants were $47.96, $47.62 and $48.39 per share respectively, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the day of the applicable grant.

The following table summarizes the activity under the restricted stock plan for the six months ended March 31, 2013:

	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Fair Value At Grant Date
Unvested at September 30, 2012	111,000		$	42.32
Granted	36,050		$	47.94
Forfeited / Canceled	(11,400	)	$	41.84
Vested	(38,500	)	$	34.00
Unvested at March 31, 2013	97,150		$	47.77
Expected to vest	97,150		$	47.77

Compensation expense related to restricted stock for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013 was $419 and $387, respectively, and for the six months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013 was $742 and $503, respectively. The remaining unrecognized compensation expense at March 31, 2013 was $2,732, to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.77 years.

In the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company repurchased 9,993 shares of stock from employees at an average purchase price paid per share of $50.51 to satisfy employee-owned taxes on share-based compensation.

Table of Contents

Stock Option Plans

The Company has two stock option plans that authorize the granting of non-qualified stock options to certain key employees and non-employee directors for the purchase of a maximum of 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The original option plan was adopted in August 2004 pursuant to the plan of reorganization and provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In January 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a second option plan that provides for options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Each plan provides for the adjustment of the maximum number of shares for which options may be granted in the event of a stock split, extraordinary dividend or distribution or similar recapitalization event. Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, options granted under the option plans are exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of grant and vest 33 1/3% per year over three years from the grant date.

The fair value of option grants was estimated as of the date of the grant. The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rates, expected forfeitures and dividend yields. The volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected term of the stock option granted. The Company uses historical volatility because management believes such volatility is representative of prospective trends. The expected term of an award is based on historical exercise data. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the expected term of the awards. The expected forfeiture rate is based upon historical experience. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation regarding dividend payouts at the time of the grant. Valuation of future grants under the Black-Scholes model will include a dividend yield. The following assumptions were used for grants in the first quarter of fiscal 2013:

Grant Date	Fair Value		Dividend Yield		Risk-free Interest Rate		Expected Volatility		Expected Life
November 20, 2012	$	13.92	1.83	%	0.32	%	47	%	3 years
December 10, 2012	$	14.12	1.82	%	0.33	%	47	%	3 years

On November 20, 2012 and December 10, 2012, the Company granted 35,600 and 1,800 options, respectively, at an exercise price of $47.96 and $48.39, the fair market value of the Company’s common stock the day of the grant. During the first six months of fiscal 2013, 30,545 options were exercised and 5,801 options were forfeited/canceled.

The stock-based employee compensation expense for stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013 was $165 and $107, and for the six months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013 was $302 and $209, respectively. The remaining unrecognized compensation expense at March 31, 2013 was $737, to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.62 years.

The following table summarizes the activity under the stock option plans for the six months ended March 31, 2013:

	Number of Shares		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (000s)		Weighted Average Exercise Prices		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
Outstanding at September 30, 2012	318,776				$	44.05
Granted	37,400				$	47.98
Exercised	(30,545	)			$	19.57
Canceled	(5,801	)			$	44.39
Outstanding at March 31, 2013	319,830		$	3,768	$	46.84	5.59 yrs.
Vested or expected to vest	311,263		$	3,699	$	43.88	5.59 yrs.
Exercisable at March 31, 2013	262,129		$	3,389	$	46.40	4.79 yrs.

Table of Contents

Grant Date	Exercise Price Per Share		Remaining Contractual Life in Years	Outstanding Number of Shares	Exercisable Number of Shares
August 31, 2004	$	12.80	1.42	32,207	32,207
March 31, 2006	31.00		3.00	10,000	10,000
March 30, 2007	72.93		4.00	59,500	59,500
March 31, 2008	54.00		5.00	73,000	73,000
October 1, 2008	46.83		5.50	20,000	20,000
March 31, 2009	17.82		6.00	20,089	20,089
January 8, 2010	34.00		6.75	25,801	25,801
November 24, 2010	40.26		7.67	20,967	13,802
November 25, 2011	55.88		8.67	20,866	7,730
November 20, 2012	47.96		9.67	35,600	—
December 10, 2012	48.39		9.67	1,800	—
				319,830	262,129

Note 11. Dividend

In the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company declared and paid a quarterly cash dividend. The dividend of $0.22 per outstanding share of the Company’s common stock was paid March 15, 2013 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 1, 2013. The dividend cash pay-out was $2,713 for the quarter based on the number of shares outstanding.

On May 2, 2013, the Company announced that the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.22 per outstanding share of the Company’s common stock. The dividend is payable June 17, 2013 to stockholders of record at the close of business on June 3, 2013.

Note 12. Fair Value Measurements

The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the inputs used to determine fair value.

· Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

· Level 2 — Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and

· Level 3 — Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

When available, the Company uses unadjusted quoted market prices to measure fair value and classifies such items within Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally-developed models that use, where possible, current market-based or independently-sourced market parameters such as interest rates and currency rates. Items valued using internally-generated models are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. If quoted market prices are not available, the valuation model used depends on the specific asset or liability being valued. A portion of the Company’s pension plan assets are in a common collective trust that is considered within Level 2. To determine the fair value of these assets, the Company uses the quoted market prices of the underlying assets of the common collective trust.

Table of Contents

The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2013:

	September 30, 2012
	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
Assets:	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash and money market funds	$	46,740	$	—	$	—	$	46,740
U.S. Pension plan assets
U.S. common stock mutual fund	30,239		—		—		30,239
Common /collective funds
Bonds	—		62,554		—		62,554
Short-term money market	—		6,762		—		6,762
U.S. common stock	—		59,677		—		59,677
International equity	—		7,053		—		7,053
	30,239		136,046		—		166,285
U.K. Plan Assets
Equity funds	6,322		—		—		6,322
Bond funds	7,297		—		—		7,297
Other funds	2,107		—		—		2,107
	15,726		—		—		15,726
Total pension plan assets	45,965		136,046		—		182,011
Total fair value	$	92,705	$	136,046	$	—	$	228,751

	March 31, 2013
	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
Assets:	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash and money market funds	$	48,011	$	—	$	—	$	48,011
U.S. Pension plan assets
U.S. common stock mutual fund	36,736		—		—		36,736
Common /collective funds
Bonds	—		66,233		—		66,233
Short-term money market	—		2,061		—		2,061
U.S. common stock	—		65,143		—		65,143
International equity	—		7,646		—		7,646
	36,736		141,083		—		177,819
U.K. Plan Assets
Equity funds	6,603		—		—		6,603
Bond funds	2,261		—		—		2,261
Other funds	7,521		—		—		7,521
	16,385		—		—		16,385
Total pension plan assets	53,121		141,083		—		194,204
Total fair value	$	101,132	$	141,083	$	—	$	242,215

The Company had no Level 3 assets as of September 30, 2012 or March 31, 2013. The carrying value of receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

References to years or portions of years in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations refer to the Company’s fiscal years ended September 30, unless otherwise indicated.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Form 10-Q”) contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding market and industry prospects and future results of operations or financial position, made in this Form 10-Q are forward-looking. In many cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology, such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. The forward-looking information may include, among other information, statements concerning the Company’s outlook for fiscal year 2013 and beyond, overall volume and pricing trends, cost reduction strategies and their anticipated results, capital expenditures and dividends. There may also be other statements of expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control.

The Company has based these forward-looking statements on its current expectations and projections about future events. Although the Company believes that the assumptions on which the forward-looking statements contained herein are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate. As a result, the forward-looking statements based upon those assumptions also could be incorrect. Risks and uncertainties may affect the accuracy of forward-looking statements. Some, but not all, of those risks are listed in Item 1A. of Part 1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012.

The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Business Overview

Haynes International, Inc. (“Haynes” or “the Company”) is one of the world’s largest producers of high-performance nickel and cobalt-based alloys in sheet, coil and plate forms. The Company is focused on developing, manufacturing, marketing and distributing technologically advanced, high-performance alloys, which are sold primarily in the aerospace, chemical processing and land-based gas turbine industries. The Company’s products consist of high-temperature resistant alloys, or HTA products, and corrosion-resistant alloys, or CRA products. HTA products are used by manufacturers of equipment that is subjected to extremely high temperatures, such as jet engines for the aerospace market, gas turbine engines used for power generation and waste incineration and industrial heating equipment. CRA products are used in applications that require resistance to very corrosive media found in chemical processing, power plant emissions control and hazardous waste treatment. Management believes Haynes is one of four principal producers of high-performance alloy products in sheet, coil and plate forms. The Company also produces its products as seamless and welded tubulars, and in slab, bar, billet and wire forms.

The Company has manufacturing facilities in Kokomo, Indiana; Arcadia, Louisiana; and Mountain Home, North Carolina. The Kokomo facility specializes in flat products, the Arcadia facility specializes in tubular products, and the Mountain Home facility specializes in wire products. The Company’s products are sold primarily through its direct sales organization, which includes 13 service and/or sales centers in the United States, Europe and Asia. All of these centers are Company-operated.

Capital Investment

Management continues to believe in the long-term growth potential of the aerospace, land-based gas turbine and chemical processing markets. Therefore, the Company is continuing to implement the previously announced capital investment projects in line with plans to meet the expected long-term growth requirements of those target markets. Capital investment in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 was approximately $13.7 million, which brings capital investment to approximately $22.7 million for the first half of fiscal 2013. The forecasts for capital investment in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2014 are approximately $70.0 million and $39.0 million, respectively. Capital investment in fiscal 2012 was $25.9

Table of Contents

million.

The actual and planned capital investments of approximately $135.0 million over the three year-period of fiscal 2012 through 2014 are expected to allow the Company to increase capacity, enhance product quality, reduce costs and improve working capital management. The Company anticipates that these significant investments will help the Company improve efficiency and meet expected long-term customer demand for volume and quality improvements.

Dividends Paid and Declared

In the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company declared and paid a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.22 per outstanding share of the Company’s common stock. The dividend was paid March 15, 2013 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 1, 2013. The dividend cash pay-out was approximately $2.7 million for the quarter based on the number of shares outstanding, and equal to approximately $10.8 million on an annualized basis. For the six months ended March 31, 2013, dividend cash payouts were $5.4 million.

Subsequent Event

On April 19, 2013 the Company’s research and administrative facilities in Kokomo, Indiana were affected by a flood. Manufacturing operations in Kokomo are conducted in separate facilities and were not interrupted by the flood. The Company is working closely with flood mitigation experts to repair the damage to its research and administrative facilities as quickly as possible.

The Company anticipates that the damage caused by the flood will have a minimal impact on its ability to complete quality control testing in order to allow shipment of finished product to customers in a timely manner. The Company has insurance which includes coverage for flood risks, however, the amount of recovery of insurance proceeds has not yet been determined. In addition, the Company cannot be certain that any insurance recovery would be recorded in the same quarter in which flood-related expenses are recognized.

Backlog

Set forth below are selected data relating to the Company’s backlog and the 30-day average nickel price per pound as reported by the London Metals Exchange for the periods shown. This should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and the remainder of the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Form 10-Q.

	Quarter Ended
	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2012		June 30, 2012		September 30, 2012		December 31, 2012		March 31, 2013
Backlog (1)
Dollars (in thousands)	$	261,811	$	264,245	$	241,151	$	222,870	$	211,726	$	206,994
Pounds (in thousands)	8,547		8,853		7,951		6,866		6,905		7,362
Average selling price per pound	$	30.63	$	29.85	$	30.33	$	32.46	$	30.66	$	28.12

Average nickel price per pound
London Metals Exchange(2)	$	8.23	$	8.49	$	7.50	$	7.81	$	7.90	$	7.59

(1) The Company defines backlog to include firm commitments from customers for delivery of product at established prices. Approximately 30% of the orders in the backlog at any given time include prices that are subject to adjustment based on changes in raw material costs. Historically, approximately 75% of the backlog orders have shipped within six months and approximately 90% have shipped within 12 months. The backlog figures do not reflect that portion of the business conducted at service and sales centers on a spot or “just-in-time” basis.

(2) Represents the average price for a cash buyer as reported by the London Metals Exchange for the 30 days ending on the last day of the period presented.

Backlog was $207.0 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of approximately $4.7 million, or 2.2%, from $211.7

Table of Contents

million at December 31, 2012. The backlog dollars declined during the second quarter of fiscal 2013 due to an 8.3% decrease in backlog average selling price for the quarter, largely offset by a 6.6% increase in backlog pounds. The reduction in the backlog during the second quarter resulted from reduced order entry pricing and a lower-valued mix of products in the backlog.

Management believes that customers continue to exercise caution in making purchases due to the current uncertain economic conditions associated with slow economic growth and due to the decreasing cost of nickel. The backlog for the aerospace and chemical processing markets declined in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. Management believes the reduction is a result of customers adjusting their inventory levels within the supply chain and an overall lack of large project orders. The backlog for the land-based gas turbine market increased in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 due to stronger order entry levels.

Quarterly Market Information

The following table includes a breakdown of net revenues, shipments and average selling prices to the markets served by the Company. This should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and the remainder of the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Form 10-Q.

	Quarter Ended
	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2012		June 30, 2012		September 30, 2012		December 31, 2012		March 31, 2013
Net revenues (in thousands)
Aerospace	$	52,726	$	61,901	$	55,908	$	59,378	$	52,272	$	49,319
Chemical processing	29,688		37,833		32,565		34,553		26,287		33,895
Land-based gas turbines	30,104		32,167		27,971		28,940		22,628		30,248
Other markets	12,721		23,082		21,280		24,477		10,618		12,034
Total product revenue	125,239		154,983		137,724		147,348		111,805		125,496
Other revenue	3,612		3,899		3,850		2,906		2,495		3,705
Net revenues	$	128,851	$	158,882	$	141,574	$	150,254	$	114,300	$	129,201

Shipments by markets (in thousands of pounds)
Aerospace	1,970		2,421		2,175		2,368		2,116		1,981
Chemical processing	1,121		1,500		1,304		1,358		986		1,429
Land-based gas turbines	1,585		1,771		1,559		1,605		1,261		1,809
Other markets	456		782		673		739		322		362
Total shipments	5,132		6,474		5,711		6,070		4,685		5,581

Average selling price per pound
Aerospace	$	26.76	$	25.57	$	25.70	$	25.08	$	24.70	$	24.90
Chemical processing	26.48		25.22		24.97		25.44		26.66		23.72
Land-based gas turbines	18.99		18.16		17.94		18.03		17.94		16.72
Other markets	27.90		29.52		31.62		33.12		32.98		33.24
Total product (excluding other revenue)	24.40		23.94		24.12		24.27		23.86		22.49
Total average selling price (including other revenue)	25.11		24.54		24.79		24.75		24.40		23.15

Net Revenue and Gross Profit Margin Performance

The following table includes a summary of net revenues, gross profit and gross profit margin percentage of the Company. This should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and the remainder of the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Form 10-Q.

	Comparison by Quarter of Gross Profit and Gross Profit Margin Percentage for Fiscal 2012 and 2013
	Quarter Ended
(dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2011			March 31, 2012			June 30, 2012			September 30, 2012			December 31, 2012			March 31, 2013
Net Revenues	$	128,851		$	158,882		$	141,574		$	150,254		$	114,300		$	129,201
Gross Profit	$	23,491		$	34,535		$	32,389		$	30,425		$	18,774		$	20,084
Gross Profit Margin %	18.2		%	21.7		%	22.9		%	20.2		%	16.4		%	15.5		%

Table of Contents

The second quarter of fiscal 2013 achieved higher revenue and gross profit than the first quarter of fiscal 2013; however, the gross profit margin percentage declined to 15.5%. Average selling price per pound was negatively impacted during the quarter by a lower value mix, lower metal prices and increased competition.

For the second quarter of fiscal 2013, net revenues increased by $14.9 million from the first quarter of fiscal 2013, volume increased by 0.9 million pounds and net income increased by $0.6 million during this period.

Outlook

Guidance

Management currently expects that net income for the third quarter of fiscal 2013 may be lower than net income for the second quarter as it is expected to continue to be unfavorably impacted by weaker pricing similar to that experienced during the first and second quarters. Visibility in the marketplace remains poor and based upon continued economic uncertainty, level of bookings to date and feedback from key customers, management does not anticipate any significant recovery during the third quarter of fiscal 2013.

Working Capital

Controllable working capital, which includes accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable and accrued expenses, was $296.8 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of $14.4 million or 4.6% from $311.2 million at September 30, 2012. This decrease of $14.4 million resulted primarily from accounts receivable decreasing from the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. Working capital as a percentage of net revenues improved with a decrease from the end of fiscal 2012 due to slightly reduced inventory levels while net revenues increased. Continued improvement is expected throughout fiscal 2013.

Competition and Pricing

The Company is experiencing increased price competition in the marketplace relative to fiscal 2012, particularly in commodity type alloys in mill-direct project business. This competition continues to require the Company to aggressively price project business orders in these markets, which has unfavorably impacted the Company’s gross profit margin and net income. As mill-direct lead times are decreasing, downward pressure on prices for service center transactional business is also occurring.

If market conditions improve, pricing competition in the high-performance alloy industry may begin to ease in future quarters. The Company continues to respond to this competition by increasing emphasis on service centers, offering value-added services, improving its cost structure and focusing on delivery times and reliability.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013

The following table sets forth certain financial information as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated and compares such information between periods.

	Three Months Ended March 31,										Change
($ in thousands)	2012					2013					Amount			%
Net revenues	$	158,882		100.0	%	$	129,201		100.0	%	$	(29,681	)	(18.7	)%
Cost of sales	124,347			78.3	%	109,117			84.5	%	(15,230		)	(12.2	)%
Gross profit	34,535			21.7	%	20,084			15.5	%	(14,451		)	(41.8	)%
Selling, general and administrative expense	10,687			6.7	%	9,414			7.3	%	(1,273		)	(11.9	)%
Research and technical expense	814			0.5	%	852			0.7	%	38			4.7	%
Operating income	23,034			14.5	%	9,818			7.6	%	(13,216		)	(57.4	)%
Interest income	(33		)	(0.0	)%	(25		)	(0.0	)%	8			(24.2	)%
Interest expense	24			0.0	%	17			0.0	%	(7		)	(29.2	)%
Income before income taxes	23,043			14.5	%	9,826			7.6	%	(13,217		)	(57.4	)%
Provision for income taxes	7,892			5.0	%	3,390			2.6	%	(4,502		)	(57.0	)%
Net income	$	15,151		9.5	%	$	6,436		5.0	%	$	(8,715	)	(57.5	)%

Table of Contents

The following table includes a breakdown of net revenues, shipments and average selling prices to the markets served by the Company for the periods shown.

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Change
By market	2012		2013		Amount			%
Net revenues (in thousands)
Aerospace	$	61,901	$	49,319	$	(12,582	)	(20.3	)%
Chemical processing	37,833		33,895		(3,938		)	(10.4	)%
Land-based gas turbines	32,167		30,248		(1,919		)	(6.0	)%
Other markets	23,082		12,034		(11,048		)	(47.9	)%
Total product revenue	154,983		125,496		(29,487		)	(19.0	)%
Other revenue	3,899		3,705		(194		)	(5.0	)%
Net revenues	$	158,882	$	129,201	$	(29,681	)	(18.7	)%

Pounds by market (in thousands)
Aerospace	2,421		1,981		(440		)	(18.2	)%
Chemical processing	1,500		1,429		(71		)	(4.7	)%
Land-based gas turbines	1,771		1,809		38			2.1	%
Other markets	782		362		(420		)	(53.7	)%
Total shipments	6,474		5,581		(893		)	(13.8	)%

Average selling price per pound
Aerospace	$	25.57	$	24.90	$	(0.67	)	(2.6	)%
Chemical processing	25.22		23.72		(1.50		)	(5.9	)%
Land-based gas turbines	18.16		16.72		(1.44		)	(7.9	)%
Other markets	29.52		33.24		3.72			12.6	%
Total product (excluding other revenue)	23.94		22.49		(1.45		)	(6.1	)%
Total average selling price (including other revenue)	24.54		23.15		(1.39		)	(5.7	)%

Net Revenues. Net revenues were $129.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 18.7% from $158.9 million in the same period of fiscal 2012. Volume was 5.6 million pounds in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 13.8% from 6.5 million pounds in the same period of fiscal 2012. The aggregate average selling price was $23.15 per pound in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 5.7% from $24.54 per pound in the same period of fiscal 2012. Average selling price decreased due to lower raw material prices, a lower-value product mix and reduced customer demand as a result of uncertain economic times. The Company’s consolidated backlog was $207.0 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of 2.2% from $211.7 million at December 31, 2012. This decrease reflects an 8.3% decrease in backlog average selling price partially offset by a 6.6% increase in backlog pounds.

Sales to the aerospace market were $49.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 20.3% from $61.9 million in the same period of fiscal 2012, due to a 2.6% decrease in the average selling price per pound combined with an 18.2% decrease in volume. The decrease in volume is due to adjustments of inventory within the supply chain and customers delaying orders as the price of nickel decreases. The average selling price decline reflects both the decline in raw material prices and competitive downward pressure on prices.

Table of Contents

Sales to the chemical processing market were $33.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 10.4% from $37.8 million in the same period of fiscal 2012, due to a 5.9% decrease in the average selling price per pound combined with a 4.7% decrease in volume. The decreased volume resulted from reduced large project business and the decreased average selling price reflects a change in product mix and lower-cost raw materials. Project delays continue in the chemical processing industry.

Sales to the land-based gas turbine market were $30.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 6.0% from $32.2 million for the same period of fiscal 2012, due to a decrease of 7.9% in the average selling price per pound partially offset by a 2.1% increase in volume. The increase in volume reflects improved original equipment manufacturer activity and higher levels of maintenance spending by the company’s customers. The decrease in average selling price reflected lower raw material costs and continued competition in this market.

Sales to other markets were $12.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 47.9% from $23.1 million in the same period of fiscal 2012, due to a 53.7% decrease in volume partially offset by a 12.6% increase in average selling price. The decrease in volume is due to the project-oriented nature of these markets, with one particular oil & gas project from fiscal 2012 not repeating in fiscal 2013. The increase in the average selling price reflects a change to a higher-value product mix shipped into the other markets in the second quarter of fiscal 2013.

Other Revenue. Other revenue was $3.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 5.0% from $3.9 million in the same period of fiscal 2012. The decrease is due to lower toll conversion sales.

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales was $109.1 million, or 84.5% of net revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $124.3 million, or 78.3% of net revenues, in the same period of fiscal 2012. Cost of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 decreased by $15.2 million as compared to the same period of fiscal 2012 due to lower volume.

Gross Profit. As a result of the above factors, gross profit was $20.1 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2013, a decrease of $14.5 million, or 41.8%, from the same period of fiscal 2012. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenue was 15.5% in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 as compared to 21.7% in the same period of fiscal 2012.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense. Selling, general and administrative expense was $9.4 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2013, a decrease of $1.3 million, or 11.9%, from $10.7 million in the same period of fiscal 2012 due to reduced costs for incentive compensation programs and certain cost management initiatives. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased to 7.3% for the second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to 6.7% for the same period of fiscal 2012 primarily due to decreased revenues.

Research and Technical Expense. Research and technical expense was $0.9 million, or 0.7% of revenue, for the second quarter of fiscal 2013. Research and technical expense was $0.8 million, or 0.5% of revenue, for the second quarter of fiscal 2012.

Operating Income. As a result of the above factors, operating income in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 was $9.8 million, a decrease of 57.4% compared to operating income of $23.0 million in the same period of fiscal 2012.

Income Taxes. Income taxes were an expense of $3.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, a decrease of $4.5 million from an expense of $7.9 million in the same period of fiscal 2012. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2013 was 34.5%, compared to 34.2% in the same period of fiscal 2012. The increased tax rate was primarily due to increased state tax rates.

Net Income. As a result of the above factors, net income in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 was $6.4 million, a decrease of $8.7 million, or 57.5%, from net income of $15.2 million in the same period of fiscal 2012.

Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended March 31, 2013 Compared to the Six Months Ended March 31, 2012

The following table sets forth certain financial information as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated and compares such information between periods.

	Six Months Ended March 31,										Change
($ in thousands)	2012					2013					Amount			%
Net revenues	$	287,733		100.0	%	$	243,501		100.0	%	$	(44,232	)	(15.4	)%
Cost of sales	229,707			79.8	%	204,643			84.0	%	(25,064		)	(10.9	)%
Gross profit	58,026			20.2	%	38,858			16.0	%	(19,168		)	(33.0	)%
Selling, general and administrative expense	20,503			7.1	%	19,225			7.9	%	(1,278		)	(6.2	)%
Research and technical expense	1,579			0.5	%	1,710			0.7	%	131			8.3	%
Operating income	35,944			12.5	%	17,923			7.4	%	(18,021		)	(50.1	)%
Interest income	(95		)	(0.0	)%	(54		)	(0.0	)%	41			(43.2	)%
Interest expense	50			0.0	%	34			0.0	%	(16		)	(32.0	)%
Income before income taxes	35,989			12.5	%	17,943			7.4	%	(18,046		)	(50.1	)%
Provision for income taxes	12,395			4.3	%	5,672			2.3	%	(6,723		)	(54.2	)%
Net income	$	23,594		8.2	%	$	12,271		5.0	%	$	(11,323	)	(48.0	)%

Table of Contents

The following table includes a breakdown of net revenues, shipments and average selling prices to the markets served by the Company for the periods shown.

	Six Months Ended March 31,				Change
By market	2012		2013		Amount			%
Net revenues (in thousands)
Aerospace	$	114,627	$	101,591	$	(13,036	)	(11.4	)%
Chemical processing	67,521		60,182		(7,339		)	(10.9	)%
Land-based gas turbines	62,271		52,876		(9,395		)	(15.1	)%
Other markets	35,803		22,652		(13,151		)	(36.7	)%
Total product revenue	280,222		237,301		(42,921		)	(15.3	)%
Other revenue	7,511		6,200		(1,311		)	(17.5	)%
Net revenues	$	287,733	$	243,501	$	(44,232	)	(15.4	)%

Pounds by market (in thousands)
Aerospace	4,391		4,097		(294		)	(6.7	)%
Chemical processing	2,621		2,415		(206		)	(7.9	)%
Land-based gas turbines	3,356		3,070		(286		)	(8.5	)%
Other markets	1,238		684		(554		)	(44.7	)%
Total shipments	11,606		10,266		(1,340		)	(11.5	)%

Average selling price per pound
Aerospace	$	26.10	$	24.80	$	(1.30	)	(5.0	)%
Chemical processing	25.76		24.92		(0.84		)	(3.3	)%
Land-based gas turbines	18.56		17.22		(1.34		)	(7.2	)%
Other markets	28.92		33.12		4.20			14.5	%
Total product (excluding other revenue)	24.14		23.12		(1.02		)	(4.2	)%
Total average selling price (including other revenue)	24.79		23.72		(1.07		)	(4.3	)%

Net Revenues. Net revenues were $243.5 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 15.4% from $287.7 million in the same period of fiscal 2012 due to decreases in both volume and average selling price per pound. Volume was 10.3 million pounds in the first six months of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 11.5% from 11.6 million pounds in the same period of fiscal 2012. The aggregate average selling price was $23.72 per pound in the first six months of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 4.3% from $24.79 per pound in the same period of fiscal 2012. Average selling price decreased due to reduced customer demand and lower-value product mix. The Company’s consolidated backlog was $207.0 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of 7.1% from $222.9 million at September 30, 2012. The backlog average selling price declined by 13.4%, which was partially offset by an increase in backlog pounds of 7.2%.

Sales to the aerospace market were $101.6 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 11.4% from $114.6 million in the same period of fiscal 2012, due to a 6.7% decrease in volume combined with a 5.0% decrease in the average selling price per pound. The decrease in the average selling price per pound reflects competitive downward pressure

Table of Contents

on selling prices. The volume decline is due to customers delaying orders as the price of nickel decreases and adjustments of inventory within the supply chain continue.

Sales to the chemical processing market were $60.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 10.9% from $67.5 million in the same period of fiscal 2012, due to a 3.3% decrease in average selling price per pound combined with a 7.9% decrease in volume. The changes in average selling price and volume are predominately due to a lower-value product mix and a lack of large projects caused by spending delays in the chemical processing industry.

Sales to the land-based gas turbine market were $52.9 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 15.1% from $62.3 million for the same period of fiscal 2012, due to a decrease of 7.2% in the average selling price per pound combined with an 8.5% decrease in volume. Volume was lower in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, but improved in the second quarter. The decrease in average selling price is due to increased competition and lower raw material cost.

Sales to other markets were $22.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 36.7% from $35.8 million in the same period of fiscal 2012, due to a 44.7% decrease in volume partially offset by a 14.5% increase in average selling price per pound. The increase in average selling price reflects a change to a mix of higher-value alloys and forms sold into the other market category. The decrease in volume is due to the project-oriented nature of these markets, with one particular oil & gas project not repeating in fiscal 2013 and customers delaying orders due to the decreasing cost of nickel.

Other Revenue. Other revenue was $6.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 17.5% from $7.5 million in the same period of fiscal 2012 due to reduced levels of toll conversion sales.

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales was $204.6 million, or 84.0% of net revenues, in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to $229.7 million, or 79.8% of net revenues, in the same period of fiscal 2012. Cost of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2013 decreased by $25.1 million as compared to the same period of fiscal 2012 due to lower volume and a lower value product mix.

Gross Profit. As a result of the above factors, gross profit was $38.9 million for the first six months of fiscal 2013, a decrease of $19.2 million, or 33.0%, from the same period of fiscal 2012. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenue was 16.0% in the first six months of fiscal 2013 as compared to 20.2% in the same period of fiscal 2012.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense. Selling, general and administrative expense was $19.2 million for the first six months of fiscal 2013, a decrease of $1.3 million, or 6.2%, from $20.5 million in the same period of fiscal 2012. Selling, general and administrative expense reductions were due to reduced costs for incentive compensation programs and certain cost management initiatives. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased to 7.9% for the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to 7.1% for the same period of fiscal 2012 primarily due to decreased revenues.

Research and Technical Expense. Research and technical expense was $1.7 million, or 0.7% of revenue, for the first six months of fiscal 2013. Research and technical expense was $1.6 million, or 0.5% of net revenues, in the same period of fiscal 2012.

Operating Income. As a result of the above factors, operating income in the first six months of fiscal 2013 was $17.9 million, a decrease of 50.1% compared to operating income of $35.9 million in the same period of fiscal 2012.

Income Taxes. Income taxes were an expense of $5.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013, a decrease of $6.7 million from $12.4 million in the same period of fiscal 2012. The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2013 was 31.6%, compared to 34.4% in the same period of fiscal 2012. The decrease in the effective tax rate was due to a change in the California tax law that took effect in November 2012, which increased the deferred tax asset and lowered tax expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 by $0.6 million.

Net Income. As a result of the above factors, net income in the first six months of fiscal 2013 was $12.3 million, a decrease of $11.3 million, or 48.0%, from net income of $23.6 million in the same period of fiscal 2012.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Comparative Cash Flow Analysis

During the first six months of fiscal 2013, the Company’s primary sources of liquidity were cash on-hand and cash from operations, as detailed below. At March 31, 2013, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $48.0 million compared to cash and cash equivalents of $46.7 million at September 30, 2012.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $29.1 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $6.6 million in the same period of fiscal 2012. Items contributing to the difference include cash provided by lower accounts receivable of $12.9 million versus $4.6 million of cash used by accounts receivable in the same period of fiscal 2012. Additionally, cash used from inventory balances (net of foreign currency fluctuation) of $1.7 million was $21.5 million lower than cash used from inventory balances in the same period of fiscal 2012. Cash provided by operations was unfavorably impacted by net income of $12.3 million, compared to $23.6 million in the same period of fiscal 2012. Net cash used in investing activities was $22.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to $12.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012 as a result of higher capital expenditures. Net cash used in financing activities in the first six months of fiscal 2013 included dividend payments of $5.4 million consistent with the first six months of fiscal 2012.

Future sources of liquidity

The Company’s sources of liquidity for fiscal 2013 are expected to consist primarily of cash generated from operations, cash on-hand and, if needed, borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facility. The U.S. revolving credit facility provides for borrowings in a maximum amount of $120.0 million, subject to a borrowing base formula and certain reserves. At March 31, 2013, the Company had cash of $48.0 million, an outstanding balance of zero on the U.S. revolving credit facility and access to a total of approximately $120.0 million under the U.S. revolving credit facility, subject to a borrowing base formula and certain reserves. Management believes that the resources described above will be sufficient to fund planned capital expenditures and working capital requirements over the next twelve months.

U.S. Revolving Credit Facility

The Company and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (“Wells Fargo”), successor by merger to Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Central) (“Wachovia”), entered into a Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”) with certain other lenders with an effective date of July 14, 2011. The maximum revolving loan amount under the Amended Agreement is $120.0 million, subject to a borrowing base formula and certain reserves. The Amended Agreement permits an increase in the maximum revolving loan amount from $120.0 million up to an aggregate amount of $170.0 million at the request of the borrowers. Borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facility bear interest at the Company’s option at either Wells Fargo’s “prime rate”, plus up to 0.75% per annum, or the adjusted Eurodollar rate used by the lender, plus up to 2.0% per annum. As of March 31, 2013, the U.S. revolving credit facility had an outstanding balance of zero. In addition, the Company must pay monthly in arrears a commitment fee of 0.25% per annum on the unused amount of the U.S. revolving credit facility total commitment. For letters of credit, the Company must pay 1.5% per annum on the daily outstanding balance of all issued letters of credit, plus customary fees for issuance, amendments and processing. The Company is subject to certain covenants as to fixed charge coverage ratios and other customary covenants, including covenants restricting the incurrence of indebtedness, the granting of liens and the sale of assets. The Company is permitted to pay dividends and repurchase common stock if certain financial metrics are met. As of March 31, 2013, the most recent required measurement date under the Amended Agreement, the Company was in compliance with those covenants. The U.S. revolving credit facility matures on July 14, 2016. Borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facility are collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of the U.S. assets of the Company, including the equity interests in its U.S. subsidiaries, but excluding the four-high Steckel rolling mill and related assets, which are pledged to Titanium Metals Corporation to secure the performance of the Company’s obligations under a Conversion Services Agreement with TIMET (see discussion of TIMET at Note 7). The U.S. revolving credit facility is also secured by a pledge of a 65% equity interest in each of the Company’s direct foreign subsidiaries.

Future Uses of Liquidity

The Company’s primary uses of cash over the next twelve months are expected to consist of expenditures related to:

· Funding operations;

Table of Contents

· Capital investment;

· Pension plan funding; and

· Dividends to stockholders.

In the first six months of fiscal 2013, the Company had capital investment of $22.7 million, which is consistent with the $70.0 million of capital investment the Company previously forecasted for fiscal 2013.

Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth the Company’s contractual obligations for the periods indicated, as of March 31, 2013:

	Payments Due by Period
(in thousands)	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 years

Contractual Obligations(1)
Credit facility fees(2)	$	1,117	$	340	$	680	$	97	$	—
Operating lease obligations	10,231		3,187		3,863		2,003		1,178
Capital lease obligations	209		33		66		66		44
Raw material contracts	71,524		47,858		23,666		—		—
Mill supplies contracts	34		34		—		—		—
Capital projects	47,592		47,592		—		—		—
Environmental post-closure monitoring	980		—		—		—		980
External product conversion source	3,200		600		1,200		1,200		200
Pension plan(3)	86,264		15,970		30,000		23,492		16,802
Non-qualified pension plan	861		95		190		190		386
Other postretirement benefits(4)	50,000		5,000		10,000		10,000		25,000
Total	$	272,012	$	120,709	$	69,665	$	37,048	$	44,590

(1) Taxes are not included in the table. As of March 31, 2013, $339 related to uncertain tax liability recorded in accordance with ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, is excluded as it is not possible to determine in which period the tax liability might be paid.

(2) As of March 31, 2013, the revolver balance was zero, therefore no interest is due. However, the Company is obligated to the lenders for unused line fees and quarterly management fees.

(3) The Company has a funding obligation to contribute $85,294 to the domestic pension plan and expects its U.K. subsidiary to contribute $970 in less than one year to the U.K. Pension Plan. These payments will be tax deductible. All benefit payments under the domestic pension plan are provided by the plan and not the Company.

(4) Represents expected post-retirement benefits only based upon anticipated timing of payments.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2. New Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Assumptions and estimates were based on the facts and circumstances known at March 31, 2013; however, future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. The accounting policies discussed in Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 are considered by management to be the most important to an understanding of the financial statements because their application places the most significant demands on management’s judgment and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. These policies are also discussed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements included in

Table of Contents

Item 8 of that report. There have been no material changes to that information since the end of fiscal 2012.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

As of March 31, 2012, there were no material changes in the market risks described in “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company has performed, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness and the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined by Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2013.

Effective January 1, 2013 the Company’s direct and indirect European subsidiaries implemented Microsoft Dynamics AX ERP information technology solution. The implementation of these ERP modules and the related workflow capabilities resulted in material changes to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Rule 13(a)-15(f) or 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Therefore, modifications to the design and documentation of internal control processes and procedures relating to the new system to replace and supplement existing internal controls over financial reporting were made as appropriate. Evaluation of the operating effectiveness of these internal controls will be done at a later date. The system changes were undertaken to integrate systems and consolidated information, and were not undertaken in response to any actual or perceived deficiencies in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

There were no other changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Set forth below is information regarding the Company’s stock repurchases during the period covered by this report, comprising shares repurchased by the Company from employees to satisfy employee-owned taxes on share-based compensation.

Period	Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans of Programs	Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
January 1-31, 2013	9,993	$	50.51	—	$	—
February 1-28, 2013	—	—		—	—
March 1-31, 2013	—	—		—	—
Total	9,993	$	50.51	—	$	—

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits. See Index to Exhibits.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC.


	/s/ Mark Comerford
	Mark Comerford
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	Date: May 2, 2013


	/s/ Daniel Maudlin
	Daniel Maudlin
	Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer
	Date: May 2, 2013

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number		Description
10.1**		Amendment No. 2 to Haynes International, Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan.
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-4(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1*		Section 1350 Certifications
101**		The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2013 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss); (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) related notes.

*Furnished not filed.

** Filed herewith. Pursuant to Rule 406T of SEC Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files included as Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those Sections.