INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST - Quarter Report: 2016 July (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 2016

Commission File Number 1-7062

INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

InnSuites Hotels Centre

1625 E. Northern Avenue, Suite 105

Phoenix, AZ 85020

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (602) 944-1500

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (l) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or l5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [X] Yes [  ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

Number of outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest, without par value, as of September 14, 2016: 9,358,444

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to unaudited

condensed consolidated financial statements

INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See accompanying notes to unaudited

condensed consolidated financial statements

INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See accompanying notes to unaudited

condensed consolidated financial statements

INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2016

See accompanying notes to unaudited

condensed consolidated financial statements

INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(i) Including $237,766 and $222,011 of cash included in discontinued operations as of July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively

See accompanying notes to unaudited

condensed consolidated financial statements

INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JULY 31, 2016 AND JANUARY 31, 2016

AND FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 AND 2015

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

As of July 31, 2016, InnSuites Hospitality Trust (the “Trust”, “we” or “our”) owns interests directly and through a partnership interest, in four hotels with an aggregate of 575 suites in Arizona, southern California and New Mexico (the “Hotels”). The Hotels operate under the trade name “InnSuites Hotels.”

Full service hotels often contain upscale full-service facilities with a large volume of full service accommodations, on-site full service restaurant(s), and a variety of on-site amenities such as swimming pools, a health club, children’s activities, ballrooms and on-site conference facilities. Moderate or limited service hotels are small to medium-sized hotel establishments that offer a limited number of on-site amenities. Most moderate or limited service establishments may still offer full service accommodations but lack leisure amenities such as an on-site restaurant or a swimming pool. We consider our Tucson, Arizona hotel and our hotel located in Albuquerque, New Mexico to be moderate or limited service establishments. All of our other properties are full service hotels.

The Trust is the sole general partner of RRF Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), and owned a 72.11% interest in the Partnership as of July 31, 2016 and January 31, 2016, respectively. The Trust’s weighted average ownership for the six-month period ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 was 72.11%. As of July 31, 2016, the Partnership owned a 51.01% interest in an InnSuites® hotel located in Tucson, Arizona, and a 51.34% interest in an InnSuites® hotel located in Ontario, California. The Trust owns a direct 50.24% interest in a Yuma, Arizona hotel property, and a direct 50.91% interest in an InnSuites® hotel located in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Under certain management agreements, InnSuites Hotels Inc., our subsidiary, manages the Hotels’ daily operations. The Trust also provides the use of the “InnSuites” trademark to the Hotels through wholly-owned InnSuites Hotels. All such expenses and reimbursements between the Trust, InnSuites Hotels and the Partnership have been eliminated in consolidation.

InnDependent Boutique Collection (IBC Hotels) or IBC Developments, a wholly owned subsidiary of InnSuites Hospitality Trust, has a network of approximately 6,500 unrelated hotel properties and provides revenue generating services and cost savings solutions to independent boutique hotels. During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014 IBC Hotels formed a marketing alliance with the Independent Lodging Industry Association (ILIA).

PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

The Partnership Agreement of the Partnership provides for the issuance of two classes of Limited Partnership units, Class A and Class B. Class A and Class B Partnership units are identical in all respects, except that each Class A Partnership unit is convertible into one newly-issued Share of Beneficial Interest of the Trust at any time at the option of the particular limited partner. The Class B Partnership units may only become convertible, each into one newly-issued Share of Beneficial Interest of the Trust, with the approval of the Board of Trustees, in its sole discretion. On July 31, 2016 and January 31, 2016, 276,131 Class A Partnership units were issued and outstanding, representing 2.09% of the total Partnership units. Additionally, as of both July 31, 2016 and January 31, 2016, 3,407,938 Class B Partnership units were outstanding to James Wirth, the Trust’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Wirth’s affiliates. If all of the Class A and B Partnership units were converted on July 31, 2016, the limited partners in the Partnership would receive 3,684,069 Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust. As of July 31, 2016 and January 31, 2016, the Trust owns 9,527,448 general partner units in the Partnership, representing 72.11% of the total Partnership units.

LIQUIDITY

Our principal source of cash to meet our cash requirements, including distributions to our shareholders, is our share of the Partnership’s cash flow, quarterly distributions from the Albuquerque, New Mexico and Yuma, Arizona properties and more recently, sales of non-controlling interests in certain of our Hotels. The Partnership’s principal source of cash flow is quarterly distributions from the Tucson, Arizona and Ontario, California properties. Our liquidity, including our ability to make distributions to our shareholders, will depend upon our ability and the Partnership’s ability to generate sufficient cash flow from hotel operations and to service our debt.

As of July 31, 2016, the Trust had a related party Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note with an amount payable of $0. The Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note accrued interest at 7.0% per annum and requires interest only payments. The Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note has a maximum borrowing capacity to $1,000,000, which is available through December 31, 2017. As of September 12, 2016, the outstanding net balance receivable on the Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note was $0.

With approximately $263,000 of cash, including approximately $238,000 from discontinued operations, as of July 31, 2016 and the availability of a $1,000,000 related party Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note, and the availability of $40,000 of the $350,000 Line of Credit issued on May 3, 2016 by RepublicBankAZ, we believe that we will have enough cash on hand to meet all of our financial obligations as they become due for at least the next year. In addition, our management is analyzing other strategic options available to us, including the refinancing of another property or raising additional funds through additional non-controlling interest sales; however, such transactions may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, or at all. We also expect to complete the sale of our four hotel properties by the end of this fiscal year.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining extensions, refinancing debt or raising additional or replacement funds, or that these funds may be available on terms that are favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional or replacement funds, we may be required to sell certain of our assets to meet our liquidity needs, which may not be on terms that are favorable.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information related to the Trust’s organization, significant accounting policies and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) has been condensed or omitted. The accounting policies followed in the preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are consistent with those followed in the Trust’s annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 31, 2016, as filed on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all material adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented and the presentations and disclosures herein are adequate when read in conjunction with the Trust’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2016.

As sole general partner of the Partnership, the Trust exercises unilateral control over the Partnership, and the Trust owns all of the issued and outstanding classes of shares of InnSuites Hotels Inc. Therefore, the financial statements of the Partnership and InnSuites Hotels Inc. are consolidated with the Trust, and all significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

On August 1, 2015, the Trust finalized and committed to a plan to sell all of its hotel properties. As of May 1, 2016, the Trust has listed all of their properties with a local real estate hotel broker and management believes that the assets are being marketed at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value. The Trust believes that the plan to sell these assets will not be withdrawn and the sales are probable by January 31, 2017 for all of the hotel properties except the Yuma hotel property which was listed for sale on May 1, 2016. The Trust believes that the Yuma hotel property will be sold prior to May 1, 2017.

SEASONALITY OF THE HOTEL BUSINESS

The Hotels’ operations historically have been somewhat seasonal. The two southern Arizona hotels experience their highest occupancy in the first fiscal quarter and, to a lesser extent, the fourth fiscal quarter. The second fiscal quarter tends to be the lowest occupancy period at those two southern Arizona hotels. This seasonality pattern can be expected to cause fluctuations in the Trust’s quarterly revenues. The two hotels located in California and New Mexico historically experience their most profitable periods during the second and third fiscal quarters (the summer season), providing some balance to the general seasonality of the Trust’s hotel business.

The seasonal nature of the Trust’s business increases its vulnerability to risks such as labor force shortages and cash flow issues. Further, if an adverse event such as an actual or threatened terrorist attack, international conflict, data breach, regional economic downturn or poor weather conditions should occur during the first or fourth fiscal quarters, the adverse impact to the Trust’s revenues could likely be greater as a result of its southern Arizona seasonal business.

It is too early to determine what the seasonality of the IBC segment is. The Trust does not anticipate much seasonality due to the diversification of the location of the IBC Hotels.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU 2014-15”). Under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity’s liquidation becomes imminent. Preparation of financial statements under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. If and when an entity’s liquidation becomes imminent, financial statements should be prepared under the Liquidation Basis of Accounting. Even if an entity’s liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. In those situations, financial statements should continue to be prepared under the going concern basis of accounting, but the amendments in ASU 2014-15 require additional disclosure of information about the relevant conditions and events. The amendments in ASU 2014-15 are effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Trust has evaluated the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and we believe no material impact exists at this time.

In June 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, “Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” (“ASU 2014-12”). The amendments in ASU 2014-12 require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”), as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. The amendments in ASU 2014-12 are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in ASU 2014-12 either: (i) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date; or (ii) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The Trust has adopted this ASU during the first fiscal quarter of 2017 and evaluated the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and we believe no material impact exists at this time.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis”. This will improve certain areas of consolidation guidance for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether to consolidate certain legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures. ASU 2015-02 simplified and improved accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) by: eliminating the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, eliminating the indefinite deferral of FASB Statement No. 167, thereby reducing the number of Variable Interest Entity (VIE) consolidation models from four to two (including the limited partnership consolidation model), and clarifying when fees paid to a decision maker should be a factor to include in the consolidation of VIEs. ASU 2015-02 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Trust has evaluated the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and we believe no material impact exists at this time.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”. The ASU changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. Under the ASU, an entity presents such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs is reported as interest expense. The ASU specifies that “issue costs shall be reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the face amount of the note” and that “amortization of debt issue costs shall also be reported as interest expense.” According to the ASU’s Basis for Conclusions, debt issuance costs incurred before the associated funding is received (i.e., the debt liability) should be reported on the balance sheet as deferred charges until that debt liability amount is recorded. For public business entities, the guidance in the ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. For entities other than public business entities, the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is allowed for all entities for financial statements that have not been previously issued. Entities would apply the new guidance retrospectively to all prior periods (i.e., the balance sheet for each period is adjusted). The Trust has adopted this ASU during the first fiscal quarter of 2017 and evaluated the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and we believe no material impact exists at this time.

In February 2016, the FASB issued a new standard which requires a lessee to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases with a lease term of more than twelve months. Leases will continue to be classified as either financing or operating, with classification affecting the recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease. It will be effective for us beginning in 2020. We are currently assessing the impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued a new standard which simplifies the accounting for share-based payment transactions. This guidance requires that excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the Consolidated Statements of Income rather than additional paid-in capital. Additionally, the excess tax benefits will be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity, rather than a financing activity, on the Statement of Cash Flows. Further, the update allows an entity to make a policy election to recognize forfeitures as they occur or estimate the number of awards expected to be forfeited. It will be effective for us beginning in 2018 and should be applied prospectively, with certain cumulative effect adjustments. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently assessing the impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Topic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosures of financial instruments including the requirement to measure certain equity investments at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. ASU 2016-01 will become effective for the Company beginning interim period April 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the guidance to determine the potential impact on its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. This new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on the consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (ASU 2016-09). This ASU makes several modifications to Topic 718 related to the accounting for forfeitures, employer tax withholding on share-based compensation, and the financial statement presentation of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. ASU 2016-09 also clarifies the statement of cash flows presentation for certain components of share-based awards. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to adopt this guidance when effective and is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

The FASB issued the following accounting standard updates related to Topic 606, Revenue Contracts with Customers:

●   ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”) in May 2014. ASU 2014-09 requires entities to recognize revenue through the application of a five-step model, which includes identification of the contract, identification of the performance obligations, determination of the transaction price, allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations and recognition of revenue as the entity satisfies the performance obligations.

●   ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) (“ASU 2016-08”) in March 2016. ASU 2016-08 does not change the core principle of revenue recognition in Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations.

●   ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (“ASU 2016-10”) in April 2016. ASU 2016-10 does not change the core principle of revenue recognition in Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas.

●   ASU No. 2016-11, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting (SEC Update) (“ASU 2016-11”) in May 2016. ASU 2016-11 rescinds SEC paragraphs pursuant to two SEC Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF meeting. The SEC Staff is rescinding SEC Staff Observer comments that are codified in Topic 605 and Topic 932, effective upon adoption of Topic 606.

●   ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients in May 2016. ASU 2016-12 does not change the core principle of revenue recognition in Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on a few narrow areas and adds some practical expedients to the guidance.

These ASUs will become effective for the Company beginning interim period February 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASC 606, but at the current time does not know what impact the new standard will have on revenue recognized and other accounting decisions in future periods, if any, nor what method of adoption will be selected if the impact is material.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Trust’s operations are affected by numerous factors, including the economy, competition in the hotel industry and the effect of the economy on the travel and hospitality industries. The Trust cannot predict if any of the above items will have a significant impact in the future, nor can it predict what impact, if any, the occurrence of these or other events might have on the Trust’s operations and cash flows. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management include, but are not limited to, the estimated useful lives of long-lived assets and estimates of future cash flows used to test a long-lived asset for recoverability and the fair values of the long-lived assets.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT AND HOTEL PROPERTIES

Furniture, fixtures, building improvements and hotel properties are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated lives ranging up to 40 years for buildings and 3 to 10 years for furniture and equipment.

Management applies guidance under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360-10-35, to determine when it is required to test an asset for recoverability of its carrying value and whether an impairment exists. Under ASC 360-10-35, the Trust is required to test a long-lived asset for impairment when there is an indicator of impairment. Impairment indicators may include, but are not limited to, a drop in the performance of a long-lived asset, a decline in the hospitality industry or a decline in the economy. If an indicator of potential impairment is present, then an assessment is performed of whether the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows over its estimated remaining life.

If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows over the asset’s estimated remaining life are greater than the asset’s carrying value, no impairment is recognized; however, if the carrying value of the asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, then the Trust would recognize an impairment expense to the extent the asset’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, if any. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are analyzed on a property-specific basis independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets. Evaluation of future cash flows is based on historical experience and other factors, including certain economic conditions and committed future bookings. Management has determined that no impairment of long-lived assets existed during the Trust’s fiscal quarters ended July 31, 2016 and 2015.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives, which range from 7 to 10 years. The useful life of the intangible asset is evaluated each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining useful life.

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

We account for business combinations by recognizing the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair values on the acquisition date. The final purchase price may be adjusted up to one year from the date of the acquisition. Identifying the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities requires the use of estimated by management and was based upon currently available data.

The Trust allocated the excess of purchase price over the identifiable intangible and net tangible assets to goodwill. Such goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes and represents the value placed on entering new markets and expanding market share (see Note 27 “Acquisition of International Vacation Hotels” footnote in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 29, 2016 with the Securities Exchange Commission).

Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results. Additionally, any change in the fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date, included changes from events after the acquisition date, such as changes in our estimate of relevant revenue or other targets, will be recognized in earnings in the period of the estimated fair value change. A change in fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration or the occurrence of events that cause results to differ from our estimates or assumptions could have a material effect on the consolidated statements of operations, financial position and cash flows in the period of the change in the estimate.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” summarizes the SEC’s views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements. SAB No. 104 establishes the SEC’s view that it is not appropriate to recognize revenue until all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. Further, SAB No. 104 requires that both title and the risks and rewards of ownership be transferred to the buyer before revenue can be recognized. We believe that our revenue recognition policies as described below are in compliance with SAB No. 104.

Revenues are primarily derived from the following sources and are recognized as services are rendered and when collectability is reasonably assured. Amounts received in advance of revenue recognition are considered deferred liabilities.

Revenues primarily consist of room rentals, food and beverage sales, management and trademark fees and other miscellaneous revenues from our properties. Revenues are recorded when rooms are occupied and when food and beverage sales are delivered. Management and trademark fees from hotels include a monthly accounting fee and a percentage of hotel room revenues for managing the daily operations of the Hotels and the two hotels owned by affiliates of Mr. Wirth. IBC Development revenues are recognized after services are rendered by the IBC member hotel.

We are required to collect certain taxes and fees from customers on behalf of government agencies and remit these back to the applicable governmental agencies on a periodic basis. We have a legal obligation to act as a collection agent. We do not retain these taxes and fees and, therefore, they are not included in revenues. We record a liability when the amounts are collected and relieve the liability when payments are made to the applicable taxing authority or other appropriate governmental agency.

Based on our policy, we recognize revenue when we believe that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and the collectability of our revenues are reasonably assured.

INCOME PER SHARE

Basic and diluted income per Share of Beneficial Interest is computed based on the weighted-average number of Shares of Beneficial Interest and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Dilutive securities are limited to the Class A and Class B units of the Partnership, which are convertible into 3,684,069 Shares of the Beneficial Interest, as discussed in Note 1.

As of February 1, 2016 and 2015, the aggregate weighted-average of these Shares of Beneficial Interest for units of the Partnership would have been 3,684,069 and 3,693,972, respectively. These Shares of Beneficial Interest issuable upon conversion of the Class A and Class B Partnership units were anti-dilutive during the six month period ended July 31, 2016 and 2015. Therefore, no reconciliation of basic and diluted income per share is presented.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

On August 1, 2015, the Trust finalized and committed to a plan to sell all of its hotel properties. On May 1, 2016, the Trust added the Yuma hotel property to the listing of all of their properties with a local real estate hotel broker and management believes that the assets are being marketed at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value. The Trust believes that the plan to sell these assets will not be withdrawn and the sales are probable by January 31, 2017 for all of the hotel properties except the Yuma hotel property which was listed on May 1, 2016. The Trust believes that the Yuma hotel property will be sold prior to May 1, 2017.

Events and circumstances, which were initially considered unlikely, that were beyond the Trust’s control have extended the time required to complete the sale of its hotel properties beyond a one-year period. Accordingly, the Company’s management performed a detailed analysis of its accounting for such properties as held for sale in accordance with ASC 360 as of July 31, 2016. Based on the analysis performed by management, it concluded that continuing to classify the properties as held for sale was reasonable based on the circumstances that created the extended time frame and management’s related actions.

The Trust has reclassified its hotels into discontinued operations and assets held for sale in accordance with ASC No. 205-20, Discontinued Operations and ASC 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment. For the hotel properties except for the Yuma hotel property. The Trust believes that events or circumstances beyond our control have existed in order for us to complete the sale of our assets. During our initial one-year period, these circumstances were considered unlikely and the Trust initiated actions necessary to respond to the change in circumstances by adjusting the asking prices. For our Ontario property, the market changed and the value of our asset significantly increased. In addition, the asset was under escrow for an agreed price but the buyer did not perform and the asset fell out of escrow. The Trust increased the price and is actively marketing the property. For our Albuquerque and Tucson properties, the Trust has lowered the asking price of these assets as the market conditions have changed in those respective markets. The Trust continues to monitor the market conditions for all of its properties on a weekly basis and continues to market these assets at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value.

Discontinued operations for the periods ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 primarily consists of each hotels’ operational revenues and expenses.

SEGMENT REPORTING

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Trust determined that its operations are comprised of two reportable segments, a Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead segment that has ownership interest in four hotel properties with an aggregate of 576 suites in Arizona, southern California and New Mexico, and the IBC Developments segment serving 6,500 unrelated hotel properties. The Trust has a concentration of assets in the southwest United States, and the southern Arizona market. On an overall basis, the Trust has elected to only put the costs directly attributable to the IBC Developments in that segment. Included in these costs are sales, marketing and technology development costs.

IBC Hotels was formed during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014. Operating results became significant during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015. IBC Hotels charges a 10% to 20% booking fee which, we believe, increases the independent hotel profits. Competitors of IBC Hotels can charge anywhere from a 30% to 50% booking fee. InnDependent InnCentives, IBC’s loyalty program, allows hoteliers to benefit from guests who frequently stay at IBC independent hotels. We are planning significant expansion of IBC Hotels during the next couple of fiscal years as we concentrate our sales and marketing efforts towards consumers, but can provide no assurance that we will be successful.

The Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), the Trust’s CEO, Mr. Wirth, does not see any value in allocating costs for items not directly attributable to the IBC Developments segment for several reasons. The first is that the Trust’s base business is the Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead segment, and the majority of the expenses of the Trust would continue even if the Trust was not in the reservation business. If the Trust were to allocate general expenses to the reservation business based on some allocation method (e.g., on sales), it would not improve the value of segment reporting, but it would only serve to make the results of the Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead segment look better and give investors a false sense of the profitability of the Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead segment without the IBC Developments segment. The CODM wants to understand the true investment in the reservation business and that result is delivered by allocating only costs directly associated with the IBC Developments segment. By retaining the remainder of costs not associated with the IBC Developments segment in the Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead segment, the Trust is able to compare the Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead segment to historical figures where the bulk of the business was only that segment of operations to gauge relative efficiency of the Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead segment as compared to historical norms.

The Trust has chosen to focus its hotel investments in the southwest region of the United States. The CODM does not review assets by geographical region; therefore, no income statement or balance sheet information by geographical region is provided.

3. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

TRUSTEE STOCK COMPENSATION

For the six months ended July 31, 2016, the Trust recognized expenses of $25,920 related to stock-based compensation. The Trust issued 24,000 restricted shares with a total market value of $51,840 in the first fiscal quarter of fiscal year 2017 as compensation to its three outside Trustees for fiscal year 2017. On a monthly basis through January 31, 2017, these shares vest at a rate of approximately 500 shares for each outside Trustee. These purchases were made by the recipients on the open market in May 2016.

The following table summarizes restricted share activity during the six months ended July 31, 2016:

OFFICER STOCK COMPENSATION

On February 22, 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees (the “Committee”) of Trust approved stock incentive bonus plan for Pamela J. Barnhill, President, Chief Operating Officer, Vice Chairperson, and Trustee of the Trust, Marc E. Berg, Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Trustee of the Trust, and Adam B. Remis, Chief Financial Officer of the Trust (individually, an “Executive” and collectively, the “Executives”).

To give incentive to get hotel operations off to a strong start for the current fiscal year starting February 1, 2016, the Committee also adopted an incentive bonus programs for the Executives based on the targeted gross operating profit (i.e., total revenues less operating expenses) (the “Target GOP”) for February 2016 and March 2016, the first two months of the fiscal year. If the Target GOP is achieved or exceeded, each Executive will be entitled to a bonus consisting of cash and Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust in the amounts set forth below:

The Committee also adopted an incentive bonus program for the Executives for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2017 (the “2017 Fiscal Year Bonus Program”). Under the 2017 Fiscal Year Bonus Program, an Executive will be entitled to receive a bonus consisting of cash and Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust of the maximum amount set forth below upon the achievement by the Executive of performance-based objectives, which include revenue, gross operating profit and strategy for the hotel and IBC Developments Division. These performance-based objectives were achieved for the period ended July 31, 2016.

The Trust met the Target GOP for February 2016 and March 2016. The Executives agreed to purchase the stock on the open market and were reimbursed by the Trust. On May 16, 2016, Ms. Barnhill purchased 5,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest at $2.449 per share and on May 20, 2016, Ms. Barnhill purchased 2,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest at $2.4883 per share and 3,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest at $2.4999 per share as described on Forms 4 filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on May 18, 2016 and May 24, 2016. Mr. Berg purchased 2,500 Shares of Beneficial Interest at $2.49 per share on May 10, 2016 as described on Form 4 filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on May 17, 2016. Mr. Remis purchased 5,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest at $2.50 per share on May 18, 2016 as described on Form 4 filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on May 18, 2016. The Trust recognized expenses of $45,426 related to stock-based compensation during the six month ended July 31, 2016.

STOCK OPTIONS

Effective February 5, 2015, the Board of Trustees of the Trust adopted the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (“2015 Plan”), subject to shareholder approval, under which up to 1,600,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust are authorized to be issued pursuant to grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units or other awards. The purpose of the 2015 Plan and the awards described below is to promote the interests of the Trust and its shareholders by providing certain employees and members of the Board of Trustees, who are largely responsible for the management and growth of the subsidiary of the Trust, IBC Hotels, LLC, with incentives and rewards to encourage them to continue in the service of the Trust.

The Board of Trustees of the Trust approved a Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (“2015 Plan Agreement”) to be used for all stock option awards. The 2015 Plan Agreement provides the grantee a four-year option to purchase a set number of Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust at an exercise price of $3.50 per share, exercisable to the extent the stock options vest and GAAP pre-tax profits of IBC Hotels, LLC are greater than or equal to the performance objectives described in the 2015 Plan agreement. For purposes of the 2015 Plan Agreement, a “Tranche” is the number of Shares for which the Stock Option has vested on a particular vesting date. The 2015 Plan Agreement has the following vesting schedule:

Stock options will become immediately vested in full if, prior to a vesting date (i) the grantee ceases to be employed by the Trust or its subsidiaries by reason of death or disability or (ii) a change of control occurs while the grantee is employed by the Trust or any of its subsidiaries. Vested tranches become exercisable as set forth below to the extent that the GAAP pre-tax profit of IBC Hotels LLC is greater than or equal to the performance objective for the applicable performance period, as described below.

On February 5, 2015, the Board of Trustees of the Trust granted to Pamela Barnhill, President, Vice Chairperson of the Board of Trustees and Chief Operating Officer of the Trust and IBC Hotels Founder and President, pursuant to the 2015 Plan and 2015 Plan Agreement, an option to purchase of 1,000,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust. On April 24, 2015, the Board of Trustees of the Trust granted to James Wirth, Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, Marc Berg, Executive Vice President and Trustee and Adam Remis, Chief Financial Officer of the Trust, pursuant to the Trust’s 2015 Plan and 2015 Plan Agreement, each an option to purchase 60,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust. On April 24, 2015, the Board of Trustees of the Trust also granted to each of our Trustees who are expected to continue to serve on the Board of Trustees through the vesting period, an option to purchase 10,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust and also granted to key operational staff options to purchase Shares of Beneficial Interest. The number of options granted to each key operational staff was based on InnSuites employment history and their direct IBC Hotels involvement. A total of 1,434,500 stock options were granted during the first quarter of fiscal year 2016. The options are subject to shareholder approval. Consistent with ASC 718-10-55-10, compensation cost associated with issuance of these options has not been recognized as shareholder approval is not perfunctory. The Board of Trustees of the Trust has decided to terminate the 2015 Plan. Management believes that a new plan needs to be created to act as a financial incentive to the Trusts employees. Management is currently working with each of the 2015 Plan participants to have them surrender their options as no value exists and is expected to exist during the 2015 Plan performance periods.

4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On December 1, 2014, the Trust entered into a $1,000,000 net maximum Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note with Rare Earth. The Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note bears interest at 7.0% per annum, is interest only quarterly and matures on December 31, 2017. No prepayment penalty exists on the Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note. The balance fluctuates significantly through the period. The Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note has a net maximum borrowing capacity of $1,000,000.

The above Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note or Note Receivable is presented as one line item on the balance sheet and totaled a receivable of $0 and $5,761 at July 31, 2016 and January 31, 2016, respectively.

As of July 31, 2016 and January 31, 2016, Mr. Wirth and his affiliates held 3,407,938 Class B Partnership units, which represented 25.80% of the total outstanding Partnership units. As of July 31, 2016 and January 31, 2016, Mr. Wirth and his affiliates held 6,939,429 and 6,175,2015, respectively, Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust, which represented 74.09% and 70.24%, respectively, of the total issued and outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest. For the six months ended July 31, 2016, Mr. Wirth’s affiliates paid the Trust $138,301 for management and licensing fees, and $33,409 for reservation fees.

On December 22, 2015, the Trust provided Advances to Affiliate – Related Party each in the amount of $500,000 to Phoenix Northern Resort, LLC and Tempe/Phoenix Airport Resort LLC. Mr. Wirth, individually and through one of his affiliates owns approximately 32% and 42%, respectively, of Phoenix Northern Resort, LLC and Tempe/Phoenix Airport Resort LLC. Both notes have a due date of June 30, 2017 and accrue interest of 7.0%. During the six months ended July 31, 2016, the Trust received $14,822 and $14,328 interest income from Phoenix Northern Resort, LLC and Tempe/Phoenix Airport Resort LLC, respectively. As of July 31, 2016, the Advances to Affiliate – Related Party balance was $300,517 and $137,816 from Phoenix Northern Resort, LLC and Tempe/Phoenix Airport Resort LLC, respectively.

Besides Pamela Barnhill, Vice Chairperson and President of the Trust and daughter of Mr. Wirth, the Trust’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Trust also employs two other immediate family members of Mr. Wirth who provide technology and administrative support services to the Trust with each receiving a $47,500 yearly salary.

See “Related Party Transactions” footnote in our Form 10-K Annual Report filed on April 29, 2016 with the Securities Exchange Commission and our Notes 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements – “Sale of Ownership Interests in Albuquerque Subsidiary,” “Sale of Ownership Interests in Tucson Hospitality Properties Subsidiary,” “Sale of Ownership Interests in Ontario Hospitality Properties Subsidiary,” “Sale of Ownership Interests in Yuma Hospitality Properties Subsidiary,” “Sale of Ownership Interests in Tucson Saint Mary’s Suite Hospitality” and “Subsequent Events”, and Note 6 to our this Form 10Q Quarterly Report, respectively.

5. NOTES PAYABLE

On July 7, 2015, the Trust’s revolving bank line of credit agreement, with a credit limit of $600,000, was changed to a four-year non-revolving note payable. The non-revolving note payable has a variable interest rate of Wall Street Journal Prime Rate plus a margin of 1% with a floor rate of 5.5%, maturing on July 3, 2019 and monthly payments of $13,978.08. The line is secured by a junior security interest in the Yuma, Arizona property and the Trust’s trade receivables. As of July 31, 2016, the non-revolving note payable balance was approximately $462,000.

On January 8, 2016, in connection with the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of International Vacation Hotels (“IVH”), the Trust entered into a $400,000 business loan with Laurence Holdings Limited, an Ontario, Canada Corporation with a maturity date of February 1, 2019 pursuant to the terms of the Security Agreement and Promissory Note (“Agreement”). The Agreement required the funds be used for the purchase of IVH assets. The agreement provides interest only payments for the first three months of the term and principal and interest payments for the remaining portion of the loan. The Agreement sets an interest rate of 8% per annum with no prepayment penalty. As of July 31, 2016, the business loan balance was approximately $360,000.

On May 3, 2016, the Trust and Yuma Hospitality Properties Limited Partnership, a subsidiary of the Trust, entered into a $350,000 one-year line of credit with Republic Bank AZ, N.A. (the “Agreement”) that bears interest at the prime rate plus 1.0% per annum The agreement includes acceleration provisions upon default. The line of credit is secured by the Deed of Trust in the Yuma, Arizona property. The funds may be used for working capital and the line is guaranteed by James Wirth, the Trust’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Gail Wirth, Mr. Wirth’s spouse and the Wirth Family Trust Dated July 14, 2006. As of July 31, 2016, the line of credit balance was approximately $310,000.

6. SALE OF OWNERSHIP INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES

The Trust has sold non-controlling interests in certain subsidiaries, including Albuquerque Suite Hospitality, LLC (the “Albuquerque entity”), Tucson Hospitality Properties, LP (the “Tucson entity”), Ontario Hospitality Properties, LP (the “Ontario entity”), and Yuma Hospitality Properties, Limited Partnership (the “Yuma entity”), which sales are described in detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 29, 2016 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Generally, interests have sold for $10,000 per unit with a two-unit minimum subscription. The Trust or the Partnership maintains at least 50.1% of the units in each entity and intends to maintain this minimum ownership percentage. Generally, the units in the each of the entities are allocated to three classes with differing cumulative discretionary priority distribution rights through a certain time period. Class A units are owned by unrelated third parties and have first priority for distributions. Class B units are owned by the Trust and have second priority for distributions. Class C units are owned by Rare Earth or other affiliates of Mr. Wirth and have the lowest priority for distributions. Priority distributions of $700 per unit per year are cumulative until a certain date; however, after that date, generally Class A unit holders continue to hold a preference on distributions over Class B and Class C unit holders. As of February 1, 2016, the Trust no longer accrues for these distributions as the preference period generally has expired. During the six months ended July 31, 2016, the priority distributions were paid for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and no priority distributions were accrued for the three months ended July 31, 2016.

During the six months ended July 31, 2016, there were no Class A, B or C units of the Albuquerque entity sold. As of July 31, 2016 and January 31, 2016, the Trust held a 50.91% ownership interest, or 279 Class B units, in the Albuquerque entity, Mr. Wirth and his affiliates held a 0.18% interest, or 1 Class C unit, and other third parties held a 48.91% interest, or 268 Class A units. As of February 1, 2016, the Trust no longer accrues for these distributions as the preference period generally has expired. During the six months ended July 31, 2016, the priority distributions were paid for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and no priority distributions were accrued for the three months ended July 31, 2016.

During the six months ended July 31, 2016, there were three Class A units of the Tucson entity sold at $10,000 per unit, which was sold from Rare Earth. As of July 31, 2016 and January 31, 2016, the Partnership held a 51.01% ownership interest, or 404 Class B units, in the Tucson entity, Mr. Wirth and his affiliates held a 0.38% interest, or 3 Class C units, and other parties held a 48.61% interest, or 385 Class A units. As of February 1, 2016, the Trust no longer accrues for these distributions as the preference period generally has expired. During the six months ended July 31, 2016, the priority distributions were paid for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and no priority distributions were accrued for the three months ended July 31, 2016.

During the six months ended July 31, 2016, there were thirty-two Class A units of the Ontario entity sold at $10,000 per unit, of which two were sold from the Partnership and thirty were sold from Rare Earth. As of July 31, 2016, the Partnership held a 51.34% ownership interest, or 496 Class B units, in the Ontario entity, Mr. Wirth and his affiliates held a 0.21% interest through Rare Earth, or 2 Class C units, and other parties held a 48.46% interest, or 468.25 Class A units. As of February 1, 2016, the Trust no longer accrues for these distributions as the preference period generally has expired. During the six months ended July 31, 2016, the priority distributions were paid for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and no priority distributions were accrued for the three months ended July 31, 2016.

During the six months ended July 31, 2016, there were 9.5 Class A units of the Yuma entity sold, at $10,000 per unit, of which 5.5 Class C unit was sold from the Trust and the remaining units were sold from Rare Earth. As of July 31, 2016, the Trust held a 50.29% ownership interest, or 401.90 Class B units, in the Yuma entity, Mr. Wirth and his affiliates held a 0.51% interest, or 4.10 Class C units, and other parties held a 49.25% interest, or 394 Class A units. As of January 31, 2016, the Trust held a 50.93% ownership interest, or 407.40 Class B units, in the Tucson entity, Mr. Wirth and his affiliates held a 1.01% interest, or 8.1 Class C unit, and other parties held a 48.06% interest, or 384.50 Class A units. As of February 1, 2016, the Trust no longer accrues for these distributions as the preference period generally has expired. During the six months ended July 31, 2016, the priority distributions were paid for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and no priority distributions were accrued for the three months ended July 31, 2016.

7. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES

The Trust paid $15,031 and $13,002 in cash for interest for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively for continuing operations.

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Albuquerque Hotel is subject to a non-cancelable ground lease that expires in 2058. Total expense associated with the non-cancelable ground lease for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 was approximately $74,000 and $64,000, respectively.

During 2010, the Trust entered into a five-year office lease for its corporate headquarters. On April 30, 2014, the lease was extended for 36 months and expires in 2017. The Trust recorded approximately $9,000 and $5,000 of general and administrative expense related to the lease during the three months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The lease included a base rent charge of $31,994 for the first lease year beginning in fiscal year 2014, with annual increases to a final year base rent of $34,120 for lease year ending in fiscal year 2017. The Trust has the option to cancel the lease after each lease year for penalties of four months’ rent after the first year with the penalty decreasing by one month’s rent each successive lease year. It is the Trust’s intention to remain in the office for the duration of the lease period, as extended.

Future minimum lease payments under the non-cancelable ground leases and office lease are as follows:

The Trust is obligated under a loan agreement relating to the Tucson Oracle property to deposit 4% of the individual hotel’s room revenue into an escrow account to be used for capital expenditures. The escrow funds applicable to the Tucson Oracle property for which a mortgage lender escrow exists are not reported on the Trust’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Restricted Cash” as the balance was $0 as of July 31, 2016 and January 31, 2016.

InnSuites Hotels has entered into membership agreements with Best Western International, Inc. (“Best Western”) with respect to all four of the Hotels. In exchange for use of the Best Western name, trademark and reservation system, the participating Hotels pay fees to Best Western based on reservations received through the use of the Best Western reservation system and the number of available suites at the participating Hotels. The agreements with Best Western have no specific expiration terms and may be cancelled by either party. Best Western requires that the participating hotels meet certain requirements for room quality, and the Hotels are subject to removal from its reservation system if these requirements are not met. The Hotels with third-party membership agreements received significant reservations through the Best Western reservation system. Under these arrangements, fees paid for membership fees and reservations were approximately $169,000 and $166,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The nature of the operations of the Hotels exposes them to risks of claims and litigation in the normal course of their business. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be determined and is covered by insurance, management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Trust.

The Trust is involved from time to time in various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Trust’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

9. SEGMENT REPORTING

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Trust determined that its reportable segments are the Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead and IBC Developments segments. Reportable segments are determined based on discrete financial information reviewed by the Trust’s CODM. The Trust organizes and reviews operations based on products and services, and currently there are no operating segments that are aggregated. Consistent with the change in reportable segments, the Trust revised its prior period financial information for the new segment structure. Historical financial information presented in this Form 10-Q reflects this change.

Information relative to the Trust’s reportable segments, for which there is no intersegment revenues, is as follows:

(i) Hotels Operations & Corporate Overhead segment includes Assets Held for Sale

(i) Hotels Operations & Corporate Overhead segment includes Assets Held for Sale

10. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

The Trust has recognized the sale of the Tucson St. Mary’s Suite Hospitality LLC (the “Tucson St. Mary’s entity”) as discontinued operations. After the sale of this asset, the Trust incurred some additional minor expenses which are presented below. Discontinued operations in the three and six months ended July 31, 2016 and July 31, 2015 primarily consists of all hotels’ operational revenues and expenses and does not include the sale proceeds and profit from the sale of our Tucson St. Mary’s hotel. The Trust has reclassified its four hotels into assets held for sale. Historical results of these hotels have been adjusted for comparability purposes and exclude any corporate general and administrative expenses.

The following financial information presents the consolidated balance sheets of the discontinued operations and assets held for sale as of July 31, 2016 and January 31, 2016, as well as the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our audited consolidated financial statements and notes therein of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016.

Our principal source of cash to meet our cash requirements, including distributions to our shareholders, is our share of the Partnership’s cash flow, quarterly distributions from the Albuquerque, New Mexico and Yuma, Arizona properties and more recently, sales of non-controlling interests in certain of our Hotels. The Partnership’s principal source of cash flow is quarterly distributions from the Tucson, Arizona and Ontario, California properties. Our liquidity, including our ability to make distributions to our shareholders, will depend upon our ability and the Partnership’s ability to generate sufficient cash flow from hotel operations and to service our debt. In addition, our management is analyzing other strategic options available to us, including the refinancing of another property or raising additional funds through additional non-controlling interest sales; however, such transactions may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, or at all. We also expect to complete the sale of our four hotel properties by the end of this fiscal year.

In furtherance of our strategic plan, we have significantly expanded InnDependent Boutique Collection (“IBC Hotels”), a wholly owned subsidiary of InnSuites Hospitality Trust, which has a network of approximately 6,500 members representing 170 countries and over 2,000,000 rooms and suites. During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014, IBC Hotels formed a marketing alliance with the Independent Lodging Industry Association (“ILIA”). We believe this new hotel network provides independent hotel owners a competitive advantage against traditional franchised brands in their markets. The network provides a booking system and loyalty program. IBC Hotels charges a 10% - 20% booking fee, which we believe increases the independent hotel profits. Competitors of IBC Hotels can charge anywhere from a 30% to 50% booking fee. InnDependent InnCentives, IBC’s loyalty program, allows hoteliers to benefit from guests who frequently stay at IBC independent hotels. IBC Hotels is dedicated to providing guests with a unique, non-cookie cutter hotel experience in addition to providing value-added amenities and resort locations to its guests. IBC Hotels has an InnDependent InnCentives travel rewards program that provides a free stay at any worldwide IBC Hotel of the guests’ choice after booking 12 nights on IBC Hotels’ website. In addition, on January 8, 2016, IBC Hotels purchased substantially all of the assets of International Vacation Hotels, a technology company located in Dallas, Texas, which provides reservation services to over 600 independent international hotels. For more information about the acquisition of International Vacation Hotels, see Note 27 of our Consolidated Financial Statements - “Acquisition of International Vacation Hotels” in our Form 10-K Annual Report issued on April 29, 2016 for the period ended January 31, 2016.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016, we identified the critical accounting policies that affect our more significant estimates and assumptions used in preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements. We believe that the policies we follow for the valuation of our Hotel properties, which constitute the majority of our assets, are our most critical policies. Those policies include methods used to recognize and measure any identified impairment of our Hotel property assets. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies since January 31, 2016.

On August 1, 2015, the Trust finalized and committed to a plan to sell all of its hotel properties. On May 1, 2016, the Trust added the Yuma hotel property to the listing of all of their properties with a local real estate hotel broker and management believes that the assets are being marketed at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value. The Trust believes that the plan to sell these assets will not be withdrawn and the sales are probable by January 31, 2017 for all of the hotel properties except the Yuma hotel property which was listed on May 1, 2016. The Trust believes that the Yuma hotel property will be sold prior to May 1, 2017.

HOTEL PROPERTIES

Our long-term strategic plan is to obtain the full benefit of our real estate equity and to migrate our focus from a hotel owner to a hospitality service company by expanding our trademark license, management, reservation, and advertising services, through InnDependent Boutique Collection (IBC Hotels), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Trust. As of July 31, 2016, IBC Hotels provided services to approximately 6,500 hotels.

We are planning significant expansion of IBC Hotels during the next couple of fiscal years as we concentrate our sales and marketing efforts towards consumers. We anticipate the IBC Hotels sales and marketing efforts to increase our revenues and decrease our consolidated net loss over the next couple of fiscal years. For each reservation, IBC Hotels receives a 10% - 20% transactional fee plus reimbursement of our credit card processing fees associated with the reservation. We cannot provide any assurance that our plans will be successful or in line with our expectations.

This plan is similar to strategies followed by internationally diversified hotel industry leaders, which over the last several years have reduced real estate holdings and concentrated on hospitality services. We began our long-term corporate strategy when we relinquished our REIT income tax status in January 2004, which had previously prevented us from providing management services to hotels. In June 2004, we acquired our trademark license and management agreements and began providing management, trademark and reservations services to our Hotels.

We expect to use proceeds from the sale of the Hotels, if any, as needed to support hospitality service operations as cash flow from current operations, primarily the rental of hotel rooms, declines with the sale of the Hotels.

The tables below provide book values, mortgage balances and listed asking price for the hotels in discontinued operations and assets held for sale as of July 31, 2016.

The listed asking price is the amount at which we would sell each of the Hotels and is based on the original listed selling price adjusted to reflect recent hotel sales in the Hotels’ areas of operation and current earnings of each of the Hotels. The listed asking price is not based on appraisals of the properties.

Although we believe it is probable, we may be unable to realize the listed sales price for the individual Hotel properties or to sell them at all. However, we believe that the listed values are reasonable based on local market conditions and comparable sales. Changes in market conditions have in part resulted, and may in the future result, in our changing one or all of the listed asking prices.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

The following non-GAAP presentations of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and funds from operations (“FFO”) are made to assist our investors in evaluating our operating performance.

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before minority interest, interest expense, amortization of loan costs, interest income, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and non-controlling interests in the Trust. We present Adjusted EBITDA because we believe these measurements (a) more accurately reflect the ongoing performance of our hotel assets and other investments, (b) provide more useful information to investors as indicators of our ability to meet our future debt payment and working capital requirements, and (c) provide an overall evaluation of our financial condition. Management uses Adjusted EBITDA to critically evaluate each of the hotels’ financial and operational performance and uses Adjusted EBITDA for trending and comparability analysis. Adjusted EBITDA as calculated by us may not be comparable to Adjusted EBITDA reported by other companies that do not define Adjusted EBITDA exactly as we define the term. Adjusted EBITDA does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to (a) GAAP net income or loss as an indication of our financial performance or (b) GAAP cash flows from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.

A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss attributable to controlling interests for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 follows:

FFO is calculated on the basis defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), which is net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses on sales of properties, asset impairment adjustments, and extraordinary items as defined by GAAP, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures and non-controlling interests in the operating partnership. NAREIT developed FFO as a relative measure of performance of an equity REIT to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the basis determined by GAAP. The Trust is an unincorporated Ohio real estate investment trust; however, the Trust is not a real estate investment trust for federal taxation purposes. Management uses this measurement to compare itself to REITs with similar depreciable assets. We consider FFO to be an appropriate measure of our ongoing normalized operating performance. We compute FFO in accordance with our interpretation of standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other companies that either do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or interpret the NAREIT definition differently than us. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities as determined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to (a) GAAP net income or loss as an indication of our financial performance or (b) GAAP cash flows from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to satisfy our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. However, to facilitate a clear understanding of our historical operating results, we believe that FFO should be considered along with our net income or loss and cash flows reported in the consolidated financial statements.

A reconciliation of FFO to net (loss) income attributable to controlling interests for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 follows:

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our operating expenses from continuing operations consist primarily of property taxes, insurance, corporate overhead, professional fees, depreciation of the Hotels and hotel operating expenses. Hotel operating expenses consist primarily of payroll, guest and maintenance supplies, marketing and utilities expenses. Under the terms of its Partnership Agreement, the Partnership is required to reimburse us for all such expenses. Accordingly, management believes that a review of the historical performance of the operations of the Hotels, particularly with respect to occupancy, which is calculated as rooms sold divided by total rooms available, average daily rate (“ADR”), calculated as total room revenue divided by number of rooms sold, and revenue per available room (“REVPAR”), calculated as total room revenue divided by number of rooms available, is appropriate for understanding revenue from the Hotels. REVPAR is a commonly used measure within the hotel industry to evaluate hotel operations. We also use REVPAR to compare the results of our Hotels between periods. In the first six months of fiscal year 2017, occupancy decreased 2.16% to 76.34% from 78.50% in the first six months of the prior fiscal year. ADR increased by $5.10, or 7.2%, to $75.95 during the first six months of fiscal year 2017 from $70.85 in the first six months of fiscal year 2016. The slight decrease in occupancy and the significantly increased ADR resulted in an increase in REVPAR of $2.36, or 4.24%, to $57.98 in the first six months of fiscal year 2017 from $55.62 in the first six months of fiscal year 2016. After our remodel of our Ontario, California property during fiscal year 2016, the property had significant increased occupancy and ADR, resulting in an increase in REVPAR. These increases were offset by continued pressures in our Tucson, Arizona and Albuquerque, New Mexico markets. We anticipate that our Ontario, California property will outperform our fiscal year 2016 results while our other properties will face continued pressures during fiscal year 2017.

Overall, we continue to focus on REVPAR and monitor each of our markets on a weekly basis. We continue to look for opportunities to replace our government business in our Yuma, Arizona property and we anticipate focusing our capital improvements efforts in our Tucson, Arizona property during the remainder of fiscal year 2017.

The following table shows certain historical financial and other information for the periods indicated:

No assurance can be given that occupancy, ADR and REVPAR will not increase or decrease as a result of changes in national or local economic or hospitality industry conditions or other factors.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2015

A summary of total operating results of the Trust for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

Our overall results for the first six months of fiscal year 2017 were positively affected by an increase in revenues from our growing IBC Hotels division and our consolidated net income from discontinued operations, offset by additional operating expenses from continuing operations. See below for discussion of operating results by segment.

The Trust has the following two segments: Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead and IBC Developments. For comparability purposes, Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead below includes Assets Held for Sale and excludes Discontinued Operations. A summary of operating results by segment for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

NET LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION, DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND ASSETS HELD FOR SALE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2015

We had a consolidated net loss before income tax provision, discontinued operations and assets held for sale of approximately $1,258,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2016, compared to approximately $893,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2015. For the six months ended July 31, 2016, after adding net income from discontinued operations and assets held for sale of approximately $1,006,000, the consolidated net loss was approximately $253,000. For the six months ended July 31, 2015, after deducting income tax provision of approximately $72,000 and after adding net income from discontinued operations and assets for sale of approximately $394,000, the consolidated net loss was approximately $571,000. This decrease of approximately $318,000 from the first six months of fiscal year 2017 as compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2016 was attributable to increased net income generated from our discontinued operations and assets held for sale.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2015

A summary of total operating results of the Trust for the three months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

Our overall results for the three months ended July 31, 2016 were positively affected by an increase in revenues from our growing IBC Hotels division and our consolidated net income from discontinued operations, offset by additional operating expenses from continuing operations. See below for discussion of operating results by segment.

The Trust has the following two segments: Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead and IBC Developments. For comparability purposes, Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead below includes Assets Held for Sale and excludes Discontinued Operations. A summary of operating results by segment for the three months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

Our overall results for the three months ended July 31, 2016 were positively affected by an increase in revenues from our growing IBC Hotels division and our consolidated net income from discontinued operations, offset by additional operating expenses from continuing operations. See below for discussion of operating results by segment.

NET LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION, DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND ASSETS HELD FOR SALE FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2015

We had a consolidated net loss before income taxes provision, discontinued operations and assets held for sale of approximately $654,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2016, compared to approximately $559,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2015. After adding net income from discontinued operations and assets held for sale of approximately $384,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2016, and subtracting net loss of approximately $389,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2015, and reducing the income tax provision of approximately $30,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2015, the Trust had approximately $270,000 consolidated net loss for the three months ended July 31, 2016 compared with a consolidated net loss of approximately $978,000, a decrease of approximately $708,000. This decrease was attributable to significant improvement in net income from discontinued operations and assets held for sale offset by the increased investment of our IBC Developments segment. After removing net income attributable to non-controlling interest of approximately $93,000 and adding net loss attributable to non-controlling interest of approximately $217,163 for the three months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, net loss attributable to controlling interests was approximately $363,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2016 and approximately $760,899 for the three months ending July 31, 2015.

REVENUE – CONTINUING OPERATIONS EXCLUDING ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS AND THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS AND THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2015

Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead Segment excluding Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

For the six months ended July 31, 2016, we had total revenue from continuing operations excluding Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations for this segment of approximately $138,000 compared to approximately $128,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2015, an increase of approximately $10,000 or approximately 7.8%. For the three months ended July 31, 2016, we had total revenue from continued operations excluding Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations for this segment of approximately $61,000 compared to approximately $42,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2015, an increase of $19,000, or approximately 45.2%.

Effective May 1, 2016, we increased our management and trademark fee revenues by charging Mr. Wirth’s hotels 5% of room revenues instead of 3% of room revenues. The accounting fees collected remained constant at $2,000 per month per property. The Trust increased their fees to keep up with market conditions as other management companies have steadily increased their fees. We expect management and trademark fee revenues will continue to increase during fiscal year 2017 as compared to fiscal year 2016 offset by the loss of the management and trademark fee revenues generated by Mr. Wirth and his affiliated hotel in Fort Worth, Texas, which was managed by the Trust and sold to an independent third party during April 2015.

IBC Developments Segment

For the six months ended July 31, 2016, we had total revenue for this segment of approximately $379,000 compared to approximately $165,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2015, an increase of approximately $214,000. In January 2016, IBC purchased International Vacation Hotels which is included in the fiscal year 2017 growth of the IBC Development segment. International Vacation Hotels, revenues for the six month ended July 31, 2015 were approximately $195,000.

For the three months ended July 31, 2016, we had total revenue for this segment of approximately $175,000 as compared to approximately $21,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2015, an increase of approximately $154,000. The growth in revenues came from International Vacation Hotels and IBC.

We anticipate strong growth in this segment over the next several fiscal years but can provide no assurances regarding such growth.

EXPENSES – CONTINUING OPERATIONS EXCLUDING ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS AND THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS AND THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2015

Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead Segment excluding Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

Total operating expenses excluding Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations for this segment of approximately $1,000,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2016 reflect an increase of approximately $61,000 compared to total operating expenses excluding Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations for this segment of approximately $939,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2015.

Total operating expenses excluding Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations for this segment of approximately $446,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2016 reflect an decrease of approximately $41,000 compared to total operating expenses excluding Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations for this segment of approximately $487,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2015.

IBC Developments Segment

For the six months ended July 31, 2016, we had total expenses for this segment of approximately $779,000 compared to approximately $223,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2015, an increase of approximately $556,000. For the three months ended July 31, 2015, we had total expenses for this segment of approximately $443,000 compared to approximately $123,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2015, an increase of approximately $320,000.

We anticipate strong growth in this segment over the next several fiscal years but can provide no assurances regarding such growth. We purchased International Vacation Hotels in January 2016. During fiscal year 2017 as compared to fiscal year 2016, our expenses for this segment increased.

REVENUE – ASSETS HELD FOR SALE FOR THE SIX MONTHS AND THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS AND THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS AND THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2015

Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead Segment - Only Assets Held for Sale

For the six months ended July 31, 2016, we had total revenue from assets held for sale of approximately $6,226,000 compared to approximately $5,937,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2015, an increase of approximately $289,000. With an extensive remodel at our Ontario, California property, we realized an overall increase of 33% in total revenues during the first six months of fiscal year 2017 as total revenues for our Ontario, California property were approximately $1,932,000 for the first six months of fiscal year 2017 as compared to approximately $1,456,000 during the first six months of fiscal year 2016, offset by a decrease of room revenues in our remaining Tucson, Arizona hotel property. Our remaining Tucson, Arizona hotel property had a decrease of approximately $150,000 as total revenues were approximately $1,457,000 for the first six months of fiscal year 2017 as compared to approximately $1,607,000 during the first six months of fiscal year 2016.

Food and beverage revenue was approximately $106,000 for the first six months of fiscal year 2017 as compared to approximately $90,000 for the first six months of fiscal year 2016, an increase of approximately $16,000. With increased occupancy at our Ontario, California property, we realized additional food and beverage revenues which we anticipate will continue through the remainder of fiscal year 2017. We also realized a 1% increase in other revenues during the first six months of fiscal year 2016 as other revenues were approximately $43,000 during the first six months of fiscal year 2016 as compared to approximately $50,000 during the first six months of fiscal year 2017. Other revenues are variable and not predicable and include laundry, gift shop, park n’ fly, pet fees and vending fees. During the remainder of fiscal year 2017, we expect other revenues to remain constant.

For the three months ended July 31, 2016, we had total revenue from assets held for sale of approximately $2,869,000 compared to approximately $2,697,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2015, an increase of approximately $172,000. With an extensive remodel at our Ontario, California property, we realized an overall 6.4% increase in room revenues during the three months ended July 31, 2016 as revenues were approximately $1,077,000 as compared to approximately $787,000 during the three months ended July 31, 2015, offset by decreases of revenues in our remaining Tucson, Arizona hotel property and our Albuquerque, New Mexico hotel property. Food and beverage revenue was steady at approximately $45,000 for both the three months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 and other revenues increased slightly to approximately $30,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2016 from approximately $19,000 during the three months ended July 31, 2015.

EXPENSES – ASSETS HELD FOR SALE FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2015)

Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead Segment – Only Assets Held for Sale

Total operating expenses for assets held for sale of approximately $4,860,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2016 reflect a decrease of approximately $347,000 compared to total operating expenses of approximately $5,207,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in operating expenses at the hotel properties for our repairs and maintenance and depreciation.

Room expenses, consisting of salaries and related employment taxes for property management, front office, housekeeping personnel, reservation fees and room supplies, were approximately $1,791,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2016 compared to approximately $1,654,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2015, an increase of approximately $137,000, or 8.3%, increase in costs. Additional room expenses were incurred during the six months ended July 31, 2016 compared to the six months ended July 31, 2015 as our occupancy increased at our Ontario, California property. We anticipate continued growth at our Ontario, California property based on our recent significant property improvements and steady occupancy at our remaining Tucson, Arizona property.

Food and beverage expenses included food and beverage costs, personnel and miscellaneous costs to provide banquet events. For the six months ended July 31, 2016, food and beverage expenses were approximately $167,000 as compared to approximately $145,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2015, an increase of approximately $22,000, or 15.2%. The increase during the six months ended July 31, 2016 as compared to the six months ended July 31, 2015, primarily corresponded with our food and beverage operations at our Ontario, California property. This increase in food and beverage expenses corresponded to the increased food and beverage revenues. We anticipate that our food and beverage operations at our Ontario, Arizona property to be steady for the remaining portion of fiscal year 2017.

General and Administrative expenses were approximately $754,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2016, an increase of approximately $53,000 from the general and administrative expenses for the six months ended July 31, 2015 of approximately $701,000. Management continues to explore and look for general and administrative cost cutting opportunities.

Depreciation expense was approximately $111,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2016, a decrease of approximately $549,000 from depreciation expenses for the six months ended July 31, 2015 of approximately $660,000. As of May 1, 2016, all of our hotel properties were classified as held for sale and the Trust has discontinued accruing depreciation expenses on those assets.

Interest expenses were approximately $343,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2016, a decrease of approximately $50,000 from the interest expenses for the six months ended July 31, 2015 of approximately $393,000. During the six months ended July 31, 2016, the Trust no longer incurred additional interest expenses associated with American Express note payables.

EXPENSES – ASSETS HELD FOR SALE FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2016 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2015

Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead Segment – Only Assets Held for Sale

Total operating expenses for assets held for sale of approximately $2,305,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2016 reflect a decrease of approximately $274,000 compared to total operating expenses of approximately $2,579,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in operating expenses at the hotel properties for our repairs and maintenance and depreciation expenses offset by an increase in room expense.

Room expenses, consisting of salaries and related employment taxes for property management, front office, housekeeping personnel, reservation fees and room supplies, were approximately $898,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2016 compared to approximately $810,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2015, approximately $88,000, or 10.8%, increase in costs. Additional room expenses were incurred during the three months ended July 31, 2016 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2015 as our occupancy increased at our Ontario, California property offset by an occupancy decrease at our remaining Tucson, Arizona property. We anticipate continued growth at our Ontario, California property based on our recent significant property improvements and steady occupancy at our remaining Tucson, Arizona property.

Food and beverage expenses included food and beverage costs, personnel and miscellaneous costs to provide banquet events. For the three months ended July 31, 2016, food and beverage expenses were approximately $73,000 as compared to approximately $68,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2015, an increase of approximately $5,000, or 7.4%. Management continues to explore and look for food and beverage cost cutting opportunities, especially at our Tucson, Arizona property.

General and Administrative expenses were approximately $368,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2016, an increase of approximately $8,000 from the general and administrative expenses for the three months ended July 31, 2015 of approximately $360,000. Management continues to explore and look for general and administrative cost cutting opportunities.

Depreciation expense was $0 for the three months ended July 31, 2016, a decrease of approximately $447,000 from depreciation expenses for the three months ended July 31, 2015 of approximately $447,000. As of May 1, 2016, all of our hotel properties were classified as held for sale and the Trust has discontinued accruing depreciation expenses on those assets.

Utilities expenses were approximately $203,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2016, an increase of approximately $15,000 from the utilities expenses for the three months ended July 31, 2015 of approximately $188,000. Our Ontario, California property has higher utility rates and increased occupancy levels during the three month ended July 31, 2016 as compared to occupancy levels during the three months ended July 31, 2015.

Interest expenses were approximately $174,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2016, a decrease of approximately $11,000 from the interest expenses for the three months ended July 31, 2015 of approximately $185,000. During the three month ended July 31, 2015, the Trust incurred additional interest expenses associated with American Express note payables.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Hotel Operations & Corporate Overhead Segment – Only Discontinued Operations

As our Tucson St. Mary’s hotel was sold to an unrelated third party on October 14, 2015, no revenues and approximately $5,000 and $17,000 of general and administrative expenses were recorded for the three and six months ended July 31, 2016, respectively. These one-time general and administrative expenses consisted of property management bonuses and uncollectable accounts receivables. The Trust does not anticipate any additional significant expenses for the dissolution of this asset.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our principal source of cash to meet our cash requirements, including distributions to our shareholders, is our share of the Partnership’s cash flow, quarterly distributions from the Albuquerque, New Mexico and Yuma, Arizona properties and more recently, sales of non-controlling interests in our Hotels. The Partnership’s principal source of cash flow is quarterly distributions from the Tucson, Arizona property and Ontario, California property. Our liquidity, including our ability to make distributions to our shareholders, will depend upon our ability and the Partnership’s ability to generate sufficient cash flow from hotel operations and sales of non-controlling interests to service our debt.

As of July 31, 2016, the Trust had a related party Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note or Note Receivable with Rare Earth, depending on whether amounts are due to or due from Rare Earth, with an amount payable of $0. The Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note or Note Receivable bears interest at 7.0% per annum and requires interest only payments quarterly. The Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note or Note Receivable has a maximum borrowing capacity to $1,000,000, which is available to December 31, 2017. The highest amount outstanding on the Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note for the quarter ended July 31, 2016 was $239,000.

With approximately $263,000 of cash and cash equivalents, including approximately $238,000 from discontinued operations, and accounts receivable as of July 31, 2016, and with the continued availability of the $1,000,000 related party Demand/Revolving Line of Credit/Promissory Note, and the availability of $40,000 of the $350,000 Line of Credit issued on May 3, 2016 by RepublicBank AZ, we believe that we will have enough cash on hand to meet all of our financial obligations as they become due for at least the next year. In addition, our management is analyzing other strategic options available to us, including the refinancing of another property or raising additional funds through additional non-controlling interest sales; however, such transactions may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, or at all. We also expect to complete the sale of our four hotel properties by the end of this fiscal year.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining extensions, refinancing debt or raising additional or replacement funds, or that these funds may be available on terms that are favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional or replacement funds, we may be required to sell certain of our assets to meet our liquidity needs, which may not be on terms that are favorable.

We anticipate a moderate improvement in the weak overall economic situation that negatively affected results in the second quarter of 2017, which could result in higher revenues and operating margins in the remainder of fiscal year 2017. We expect the major challenge for the remaining portion of fiscal year 2017 is the continuation of strong competition for corporate leisure group and government business in the markets in which we operate, which may affect our ability to increase room rates while maintaining market share.

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities totaled approximately ($746,000) and $281,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and July 31, 2015, respectively. Refer to the discussion below for the change in the net cash (used in) provided by operating activities.

Consolidated net loss was approximately ($253,000) and approximately ($571,000) for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The differences in consolidated net loss for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 are explained above in the results of operations of the Trust.

Changes in the adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, consist primarily of changes in the hotel property deprecation of approximately $161,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2016 compared with approximately $914,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2015, cumulative changes in assets and liabilities for accounts receivables of approximately ($665,000) and approximately $173,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately ($38,000) and approximately ($308,000) for the six months July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These changes resulted in net cash used in operating activities of approximately ($746,000) for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and net cash provided in operating activities of approximately $281,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2015. Hotel depreciation decreased significantly during the six months ended July 31, 2016 compared with the six months ended July 31, 2015, as all of our hotels are included in discontinued operations and assets held for sale and depreciation has halted. Significant additional accounts receivables were generated during the six months ended July 31, 2016 from our IBC Developments segment which the Trust expects to collect during the three months ended October 31, 2016.

Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $719,000 and $841,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decreased net cash used by investing activities was primarily due to our collections of advances to affiliates – related party, offset by our additional continued investment in our hotels with improvements and additions to the hotel properties.

Net cash used in financing activities totaled approximately $230,000 and net cash provided by financing activities totaled approximately $353,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to the decrease in borrowings on notes payable to banks, proceeds from sales of non-controlling interest in subsidiaries, increase in payments on notes payable – related party, offset by a decreased amount of payments on notes payable to bank, decreased amount of payments on line of credit – related party, increased borrowings on notes payable – related party and decreased distributions to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries.

We continue to contribute to a Capital Expenditures Fund (the “Fund”) an amount equal to 4% of the InnSuites Hotels’ revenues from operation of the Hotels. The Fund is restricted by the mortgage lender for one of our properties. As of July 31, 2016, there were no monies held in these accounts, which are usually reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Restricted Cash.” The Fund is intended to be used for capital improvements to the Hotels and refurbishment and replacement of furniture, fixtures and equipment. During the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, the Hotels and Corporate office spent approximately $1,253,000 and $842,000, respectively, for capital expenditures. We consider the majority of these improvements to be revenue producing. Therefore, these amounts are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. For fiscal year 2017 capital expenditures, we plan on spending approximately the same amount as we did during fiscal year 2016. During fiscal year 2016, we spent approximately $2,126,000 of capital expenditures. Repairs and maintenance of approximately $490,000 and $707,000 were charged to expense as incurred for six months ending July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

We have minimum debt payments of approximately $838,000 and approximately $823,000 due during fiscal year 2017 and fiscal year 2018, respectively. Minimum debt payments due during the remainder of fiscal year 2017 include approximately $248,000 of mortgage notes payable.

As of July 31, 2016, we had mortgage notes payable, net of discounts, of approximately $13,557,000 outstanding with respect to the Hotels, approximately $462,000 in an unsecured non-revolving note payable, approximately $354,000 in an unsecured business loan, approximately $310,000 in an unsecured revolving note payable, approximately $55,000 in an unsecured promissory note to a unrelated party, and approximately $21,000 of secured promissory notes outstanding to unrelated third parties arising from the Shares of Beneficial Interest and Partnership unit repurchases.

We may seek to negotiate additional credit facilities or issue debt instruments. Any debt incurred or issued by us may be secured or unsecured, long-term, medium-term or short-term, bear interest at a fixed or variable rate and be subject to such other terms as we consider prudent.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Other than lease commitments and legal contingencies incurred in the normal course of business, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities. We do not have any majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries that are not included in our consolidated financial statements.

SEASONALITY

The Hotels’ operations historically have been somewhat seasonal. The two southern Arizona hotels experience their highest occupancy in the first fiscal quarter and, to a lesser extent, the fourth fiscal quarter. The second fiscal quarter tends to be the lowest occupancy period at those two southern Arizona hotels. This seasonality pattern can be expected to cause fluctuations in the Trust’s quarterly revenues. The two hotels located in California and New Mexico historically experience their most profitable periods during the second and third fiscal quarters (the summer season), providing some balance to the general seasonality of the Trust’s hotel business.

The seasonal nature of the Trust’s business increases its vulnerability to risks such as labor force shortages and cash flow issues. Further, if an adverse event such as an actual or threatened terrorist attack, international conflict, data breach, regional economic downturn or poor weather conditions should occur during the first or fourth fiscal quarters, the adverse impact to the Trust’s revenues could likely be greater as a result of its southern Arizona seasonal business.

It is too early to determine what the seasonality of the IBC segment is. The Trust does not anticipate much seasonality due to the diversification of the location of the IBC Hotels.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including statements containing the phrases “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “predicts,” “projects,” “will be,” “should be,” “looking ahead,” “may” or similar words, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created by such Acts. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding our intent, belief or current expectations in respect of (i) the declaration or payment of dividends; (ii) the leasing, management or operation of the Hotels; (iii) the adequacy of reserves for renovation and refurbishment; (iv) our financing plans; (v) our position regarding investments, acquisitions, developments, financings, conflicts of interest and other matters; (vi) expansion of IBC Hotels; (vii) our plans and expectations regarding future sales of hotel properties; and (viii) trends affecting our or any Hotel’s financial condition or results of operations.

These forward-looking statements reflect our current views in respect of future events and financial performance, but are subject to many uncertainties and factors relating to the operations and business environment of the Hotels that may cause our actual results to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Examples of such uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

We do not undertake any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Pursuant to Section 21E(b)(2)(E) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the qualifications set forth hereinabove are inapplicable to any forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q relating to the operations of the Trust.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of July 31, 2016.

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See Note 8 to the notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On January 2, 2001, the Board of Trustees approved a share repurchase program under Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the purchase of up to 250,000 Partnership units and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market or privately negotiated transactions. On September 10, 2002, August 18, 2005 and September 10, 2007, the Board of Trustees approved the purchase of up to 350,000 additional Partnership units and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market or privately negotiated transactions. Additionally, on January 5, 2009, September 15, 2009 and January 31, 2010, the Board of Trustees approved the purchase of up to 300,000, 250,000 and 350,000, respectively, additional Partnership units and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market or privately negotiated transactions. Acquired Shares of Beneficial Interest will be held in treasury and will be available for future acquisitions and financings and/or for awards granted under the InnSuites Hospitality Trust 1997 Stock Incentive and Option Plan. During the three months ended July 31, 2016, the Trust acquired 5,485 Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market transactions at an average price of $2.60 per share. The average price paid includes brokerage commissions. The Trust intends to continue repurchasing Shares of Beneficial Interest in compliance with applicable legal and NYSE MKT requirements. The Trust remains authorized to repurchase an additional 85,720 Partnership units and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest pursuant to the publicly announced share repurchase program, which has no expiration date.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.