Integer Holdings Corp - Quarter Report: 2009 April (Form 10-Q)
U.S.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
Quarter ended April 3, 2009
Commission
File Number 1-16137
GREATBATCH,
INC.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State of
incorporation)
16-1531026
(I.R.S.
employer identification no.)
10000
Wehrle Drive
Clarence,
New York
14031
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(716)
759-5600
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No
¨
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting company ¨
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2). Yes ¨ No
x
The
number of shares outstanding of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per
share, as of May 12, 2009 was: 23,185,951 shares.
GREATBATCH,
INC.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS FOR FORM 10-Q
AS
OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 3, 2009
Page
|
||
COVER
PAGE
|
1
|
|
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
2
|
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited)
|
||
ITEM
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
3
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
|
4
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
5
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
|
6
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7
|
|
ITEM
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
27
|
ITEM
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
42
|
ITEM
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
43
|
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
ITEM
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
44
|
ITEM
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
44
|
ITEM
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
44
|
ITEM
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
44
|
ITEM
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
44
|
ITEM
5.
|
Other
Information
|
44
|
ITEM
6.
|
Exhibits
|
45
|
SIGNATURES
|
45
|
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
45
|
- 2
-
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
GREATBATCH,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - Unaudited
(in
thousands except share and per share data)
As of
|
||||||||
April 3,
|
January 2,
|
|||||||
|
2009
|
2009 (1)
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 15,098 | $ | 22,063 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
|
||||||||
$2.2
million in 2009 and $1.6 million in 2008
|
91,977 | 86,364 | ||||||
Inventories,
net of reserve
|
117,826 | 112,304 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
8,062 | 8,086 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
5,809 | 6,754 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
238,772 | 235,571 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
163,713 | 166,668 | ||||||
Amortizing
intangible assets, net
|
86,618 | 90,259 | ||||||
Trademarks
and trade names
|
36,054 | 36,130 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
300,669 | 302,221 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,867 | 1,942 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
15,302 | 15,242 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 842,995 | $ | 848,033 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 39,763 | $ | 48,727 | ||||
Income
taxes payable
|
3,881 | 4,128 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
32,571 | 40,497 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
76,215 | 93,352 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
315,588 | 314,384 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
60,011 | 57,905 | ||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
7,517 | 7,601 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
459,331 | 473,242 | ||||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares; no shares issued
or outstanding in 2009 or 2008
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares; 23,185,685 shares
issued and outstanding in 2009 and 22,970,916 shares issued and 22,943,176
shares outstanding in 2008
|
23 | 23 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
288,441 | 283,322 | ||||||
Treasury
stock, at cost, no shares in 2009 and 27,740 shares in
2008
|
- | (741 | ) | |||||
Retained
earnings
|
101,927 | 95,263 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(6,727 | ) | (3,076 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
383,664 | 374,791 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 842,995 | $ | 848,033 |
(1) Retroactively
Adjusted – See Note 2.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements
- 3
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) – Unaudited
(in
thousands except per share data)
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April 3,
|
March 28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008 (1)
|
|||||||
Sales
|
$ | 139,818 | $ | 122,154 | ||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
||||||||
Cost
of sales - excluding amortization of intangible assets
|
93,954 | 93,745 | ||||||
Cost
of sales - amortization of intangible assets
|
1,700 | 1,710 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
18,687 | 18,347 | ||||||
Research,
development and engineering costs, net
|
7,875 | 9,224 | ||||||
Acquired
in-process research and development
|
- | 2,240 | ||||||
Other
operating expense, net
|
2,803 | 1,028 | ||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
14,799 | (4,140 | ) | |||||
Interest
expense
|
4,889 | 5,078 | ||||||
Interest
income
|
(25 | ) | (396 | ) | ||||
Other
(income) expense, net
|
207 | (1,457 | ) | |||||
Income
(loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
9,728 | (7,365 | ) | |||||
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
3,064 | (2,920 | ) | |||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 6,664 | $ | (4,445 | ) | |||
Earnings
(loss) per share:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.29 | $ | (0.20 | ) | |||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.28 | $ | (0.20 | ) | |||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
22,814 | 22,386 | ||||||
Diluted
|
23,899 | 22,386 | ||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 6,664 | $ | (4,445 | ) | |||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
(3,917 | ) | 7,209 | |||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax
|
266 | (461 | ) | |||||
Unrealized
gain on short-term investments available for sale, net of
tax
|
- | 35 | ||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$ | 3,013 | $ | 2,338 |
(1)
Retroactively Adjusted - See Note 2.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements
- 4
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - Unaudited
(in
thousands)
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April
3,
|
March
28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008 (1)
|
|||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 6,664 | $ | (4,445 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
|
||||||||
by
operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
11,669 | 17,642 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
2,861 | 3,046 | ||||||
Acquired
in-process research and development
|
- | 2,240 | ||||||
Other
non-cash losses
|
847 | 79 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,158 | 806 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(7,092 | ) | (9,807 | ) | ||||
Inventories
|
(6,543 | ) | 221 | |||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
815 | 759 | ||||||
Accounts
payable
|
(7,581 | ) | (6,021 | ) | ||||
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
(3,503 | ) | 2,506 | |||||
Income
taxes payable
|
(235 | ) | (3,972 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
60 | 3,054 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
||||||||
Purchase
of short-term investments
|
- | (1,988 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from maturity/disposition of short-term investments
|
- | 2,550 | ||||||
Acquisition
of property, plant and equipment
|
(5,416 | ) | (7,924 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions,
net of cash acquired
|
- | (99,745 | ) | |||||
Other
investing activities
|
184 | 180 | ||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(5,232 | ) | (106,927 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
||||||||
Principal
payments of long-term debt
|
(13,000 | ) | (31,682 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from issuance of long-term debt
|
12,000 | 117,000 | ||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
16 | - | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits from stock-based awards
|
3 | 16 | ||||||
Repurchase
of treasury stock
|
(741 | ) | (793 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(1,722 | ) | 84,541 | |||||
Effect
of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash
equivalents
|
(71 | ) | 166 | |||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(6,965 | ) | (19,166 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
22,063 | 33,473 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 15,098 | $ | 14,307 |
(1)
Retroactively Adjusted - See Note 2.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements
- 5
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY - Unaudited
(in
thousands)
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Treasury
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Paid-In
|
Stock
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Earnings
|
Loss
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
January 2, 2009 (1)
|
22,971 | $ | 23 | $ | 283,322 | (28 | ) | $ | (741 | ) | $ | 95,263 | $ | (3,076 | ) | $ | 374,791 | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
- | - | 1,829 | - | - | - | - | 1,829 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
shares issued under stock incentive plans
|
20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income
tax benefit from stock options and restricted stock
|
- | - | 16 | - | - | - | - | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
contributed to 401(k) Plan
|
195 | - | 3,274 | 28 | 741 | - | - | 4,015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | - | - | 6,664 | - | 6,664 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
other comprehensive loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (3,651 | ) | (3,651 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
April 3, 2009
|
23,186 | $ | 23 | $ | 288,441 | - | $ | - | $ | 101,927 | $ | (6,727 | ) | $ | 383,664 |
(1)
Retroactively Adjusted - See Note 2.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements
- 6
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
1.
|
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
|
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America for interim financial information (Accounting
Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting)
and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information
necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations,
and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. Operating results for interim periods
are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the fiscal
year as a whole. In the opinion of management, the condensed
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the
results of Greatbatch, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Greatbatch Ltd.
(collectively “Greatbatch” or the “Company”) for the periods
presented. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, sales, expenses, and related disclosures at the
date of the financial statements and during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from these
estimates. The January 2, 2009 condensed consolidated balance sheet
data, as retroactively adjusted (See note 2), was derived from audited financial
statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January
2, 2009. The Company utilizes a fifty-two, fifty-three week fiscal
year ending on the Friday nearest December 31st. For 52-week years, each quarter
contains 13 weeks. The first quarter of 2009 and 2008 each contained
13 weeks and ended on April 3, and March 28, respectively.
2.
|
APPLICATION
OF NEW ACCOUNTING POLICY
|
During
the first quarter of 2009, the Company was required to adopt Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position (“FSP”) APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments that May be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement)” as it was determined
that Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument
(or Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” did not impact
the Company’s determination that its convertible subordinated notes are indexed
to its own stock. Thus, the conversion feature of the subordinated
notes remains eligible for the paragraph 11(a) scope exception of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities” and is not required to
be accounted for as a derivative instrument. This FSP requires
retrospective restatement for all prior periods presented in financial
statements.
This FSP
requires issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash
upon conversion, such as the Company’s CSN II as described in Note 6, to
separately account for the liability and equity components of those instruments
in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate
when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. As a result,
the Company first determined the carrying amount of the liability component of
CSN II by measuring the fair value of a similar liability that does not have the
associated conversion option as of the date CSN II was issued (March 2007).
The carrying amount of the conversion option was then determined by
deducting the fair value of the liability component from the initial proceeds
received from the issuance of CSN II. The carrying amount of the conversion
option was retroactively recorded as Additional Paid-In Capital with an offset
to Long-Term Debt. The carrying amount of the conversion option is
being amortized to Interest Expense using the effective interest rate
method over the expected life of a similar liability that does not have the
associated conversion option.
- 7
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
Deferred
financing fees incurred in connection with the issuance of CSN II, previously
recorded as Other Assets, were allocated to the liability and equity
components in proportion to the allocation of proceeds between the liability and
equity components. The deferred financing fees allocated to the debt
component are being amortized to Interest Expense over the expected life of
CSN II. The deferred financing fees allocated to the equity
component were recorded as an offset to Stockholders’ Equity.
The 2008
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented in this quarterly report
have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the accounting for FSP APB 14-1 as
if it were in effect as of the date CSN II was originally issued. The
following table provides the impact of FSP APB 14-1 on the 2008 Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements:
As
Previously
|
FSP
APB 14-1
|
Adjusted
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands except per share amounts)
|
Reported
|
Adjustment
|
Amounts
|
|||||||||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
||||||||||||
(As
of January 2, 2009)
|
||||||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
$ | 16,140 | $ | (898 | ) | $ | 15,242 | |||||
Total
assets
|
848,931 | (898 | ) | 848,033 | ||||||||
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
$ | 352,920 | $ | (38,536 | ) | $ | 314,384 | |||||
Deferred
income taxes - noncurrent
|
44,306 | 13,599 | 57,905 | |||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
498,179 | (24,937 | ) | 473,242 | ||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
$ | 251,772 | $ | 31,550 | $ | 283,322 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
102,774 | (7,511 | ) | 95,263 | ||||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
350,752 | 24,039 | 374,791 | |||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
848,931 | (898 | ) | 848,033 | ||||||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
||||||||||||
(Three
months ended March 28, 2008)
|
||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
$ | 3,431 | $ | 1,647 | $ | 5,078 | ||||||
Income
(loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
(5,718 | ) | (1,647 | ) | (7,365 | ) | ||||||
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
(2,344 | ) | (576 | ) | (2,920 | ) | ||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
(3,374 | ) | (1,071 | ) | (4,445 | ) | ||||||
Earnings
(loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | |||
Diluted
|
(0.15 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.20 | ) | ||||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
|
||||||||||||
(Three
months ended March 28, 2008)
|
||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | (3,374 | ) | $ | (1,071 | ) | $ | (4,445 | ) | |||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
15,995 | 1,647 | 17,642 | |||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,382 | (576 | ) | 806 | ||||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
3,054 | - | 3,054 |
- 8
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
3.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April 3,
|
March 28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Noncash
investing and financing activities (in thousands):
|
||||||||
Net
unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities
|
$ | - | $ | 35 | ||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net
|
266 | (461 | ) | |||||
Common
stock contributed to 401(k) Plan
|
4,015 | 3,472 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment purchases included in accounts payable
|
1,636 | 2,399 | ||||||
Deferred
financing fees and acquisition costs included in accrued expenses and
other current liabilities
|
- | 5,801 | ||||||
Shares
isued in connection with a business acquisition
|
- | 1,473 | ||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 916 | $ | 262 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
440 | 225 | ||||||
Acquisition
of noncash assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Assets
acquired
|
$ | - | $ | 163,262 | ||||
Liabilities
assumed
|
- | 57,751 |
4.
|
INVENTORIES,
NET
|
Inventories
are comprised of the following (in thousands):
April
3,
|
January
2,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2009
|
|||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 59,387 | $ | 58,352 | ||||
Work-in-process
|
28,834 | 28,851 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
29,605 | 25,101 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 117,826 | $ | 112,304 |
- 9
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
5.
|
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
|
Amortizing
intangible assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):
Gross
carrying
amount
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
Foreign
currency
translation
|
Net carrying
amount
|
|||||||||||||
April 3, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Purchased
technology and patents
|
$ | 81,639 | $ | (37,561 | ) | $ | (247 | ) | $ | 43,831 | ||||||
Customer
lists
|
46,547 | (4,823 | ) | (360 | ) | 41,364 | ||||||||||
Other
|
3,508 | (2,068 | ) | (17 | ) | 1,423 | ||||||||||
Total
amortizing intangible assets
|
$ | 131,694 | $ | (44,452 | ) | $ | (624 | ) | $ | 86,618 | ||||||
January 2, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Purchased
technology and patents
|
$ | 81,639 | $ | (35,881 | ) | $ | 184 | $ | 45,942 | |||||||
Customer
lists
|
46,547 | (4,056 | ) | 271 | 42,762 | |||||||||||
Other
|
3,508 | (1,964 | ) | 11 | 1,555 | |||||||||||
Total
amortizing intangible assets
|
$ | 131,694 | $ | (41,901 | ) | $ | 466 | $ | 90,259 |
|
Aggregate
amortization expense for the first quarter of 2009 and 2008 was $2.6
million and $2.7 million, respectively. As of April 3, 2009,
annual amortization expense is estimated to be $7.4 million for the
remainder of 2009, $9.5 million for 2010, $9.4 million for 2011, $9.3
million for 2012, $8.5 million for 2013 and $7.8 million for
2014.
|
|
The
change in trademarks and trade names during the first quarter of 2009 is
as follows (in thousands):
|
Balance
at January 2, 2009
|
$ | 36,130 | ||
Foreign
currency translation
|
(76 | ) | ||
Balance
at April 3, 2009
|
$ | 36,054 |
During
the first quarter of 2009, the Company completed its branding initiative, which
included a review of its “non-Greatbatch” trade names, including those
acquired with its recent acquisitions. The outcome of this review did
not result in any impact to the indefinite useful life designation of the
Company’s “non-Greatbatch” trade names, which had a value of $20.2 million
as of April 3, 2009.
|
The
change in goodwill during the first quarter of 2009 is as follows (in
thousands):
|
Greatbatch
Medical
|
Electrochem
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Balance
at January 2, 2009
|
$ | 292,278 | $ | 9,943 | $ | 302,221 | ||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
(1,552 | ) | - | (1,552 | ) | |||||||
Balance
at April 3, 2009
|
$ | 290,726 | $ | 9,943 | $ | 300,669 |
- 10
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
6.
|
LONG-TERM
DEBT
|
Long-term
debt is comprised of the following (in thousands):
April
3,
|
January
2,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2009
|
|||||||
Revolving
line of credit
|
$ | 131,000 | $ | 132,000 | ||||
2.25%
convertible subordinated notes I, due 2013
|
30,450 | 30,450 | ||||||
2.25%
convertible subordinated notes II, due 2013
|
197,782 | 197,782 | ||||||
Unamortized
discount
|
(43,644 | ) | (45,848 | ) | ||||
Total
long-term debt
|
$ | 315,588 | $ | 314,384 |
Revolving Line of
Credit - The Company has a senior credit facility (the “Credit Facility”)
consisting of a $235 million revolving credit facility, which can be increased
to $335 million upon the Company’s request. The Credit Facility also
contains a $15 million letter of credit subfacility and a $15 million swingline
subfacility. The Credit Facility is secured by the Company’s
non-realty assets including cash, accounts and notes receivable, and
inventories, and has an expiration date of May 22, 2012 with a one-time option
to extend to April 1, 2013 if no default has occurred. Interest rates
under the Credit Facility are, at the Company’s option, based upon the current
prime rate or the LIBOR rate plus a margin that varies with the Company’s
leverage ratio. If interest is paid based upon the prime rate, the
applicable margin is between minus 1.25% and 0.00%. If interest is
paid based upon the LIBOR rate, the applicable margin is between 1.00% and
2.00%. The Company is required to pay a commitment fee between 0.125%
and 0.250% per annum on the unused portion of the Credit Facility based on the
Company’s leverage ratio.
The
Credit Facility contains limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness,
limitations on the incurrence of liens and licensing of intellectual property,
limitations on investments and restrictions on certain
payments. Except to the extent paid for by common equity of
Greatbatch or paid for out of cash on hand, the Credit Facility limits the
amount paid for acquisitions to $100 million. The restrictions on
payments, among other things, limit repurchases of Greatbatch’s stock to $60
million and limits the ability of the Company to make cash payments upon
conversion of CSN II. These limitations can be waived upon the
Company’s request and approval of a simple majority of the lenders.
The
Credit Facility also requires the Company to maintain a ratio of adjusted
EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement, to interest expense of at least 3.00
to 1.00, and a total leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement, of not
greater than 5.00 to 1.00 from May 22, 2007 through September 29, 2009 and not
greater than 4.50 to 1.00 from September 30, 2009 and thereafter. As
of April 3, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all required
covenants.
The
Credit Facility contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence and
during the continuance of an event of default, a majority of the lenders may
declare the outstanding advances and all other obligations under the Credit
Facility immediately due and payable.
- 11
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
The
weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the Company’s revolving line
of credit as of April 3, 2009, which does not include the impact of the interest
rate swaps described below, was 2.7%. Interest rates reset based upon
the six-month ($111 million), three-month ($2 million), two-month ($13 million)
and one-month ($5 million) LIBOR rate. As of April 3, 2009, the
Company had $104 million available under its revolving line of
credit.
Interest Rate Swaps –
The Company has entered into three receive floating-pay fixed interest rate
swaps indexed to the six-month LIBOR rate. The objective of these
swaps is to hedge against potential changes in cash flows on the Company’s
outstanding revolving line of credit, which is indexed to the six-month LIBOR
rate. No credit risk was hedged. The receive variable leg
of the swap and the variable rate paid on the revolving line of credit bear the
same rate of interest, excluding the credit spread, and reset and pay interest
on the same dates. The Company intends to continue electing the
six-month LIBOR as the benchmark interest rate on the debt being
hedged. If the Company repays the debt it intends to replace the
hedged item with similarly indexed forecast cash flows. Information
regarding the Company’s outstanding interest rate swaps is as
follows:
Current
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Pay
|
receive
|
value
|
Balance
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Type
of
|
Notional
|
Start
|
End
|
fixed
|
floating
|
April
3,
|
Sheet
|
|||||||||||||||
Instrument
|
hedge
|
amount
|
date
|
date
|
rate
|
rate
|
2009
|
Location
|
||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
rate swap
|
Cash
flow
|
$ | 80,000 |
3/5/2008
|
7/7/2010
|
3.09 | % | 1.75 | % | $ | (1,354 | ) |
Oth
Liabilities
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate swap
|
Cash
flow
|
18,000 |
12/18/2008
|
12/18/2010
|
2.00 | % | 2.17 | % | (50 | ) |
Oth
Liabilities
|
|||||||||||
Interest
rate swap
|
Cash
flow
|
50,000 |
7/7/2010
|
7/7/2011
|
2.16 | % |
6M
LIBOR
|
(7 | ) |
Oth
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||
$ | 148,000 | 2.64 | % | $ | (1,411 | ) |
The
estimated fair value of the interest rate swap agreements represents the amount
the Company expects to receive (pay) to terminate the contracts and is recorded
as Other Assets or Other Long-Term Liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets. No portion of the change in fair value of the
interest rate swaps during the first three months of 2009 was considered
ineffective. The amount recorded as additional interest expense
during the first three months of 2009 related to the interest rate swaps was
$0.2 million.
Convertible
Subordinated Notes - In May 2003, the Company completed a private
placement of $170 million of 2.25% convertible subordinated notes, due 2013
(“CSN I”). In March 2007, the Company entered into separate,
privately negotiated agreements to exchange $117.8 million of CSN I for an
equivalent principal amount of a new series of 2.25% convertible subordinated
notes due 2013 (“CSN II”) (collectively the “Exchange”) at a 5%
discount. The primary purpose of the Exchange was to eliminate the
June 15, 2010 call and put option that is included in the terms of CSN
I. In connection with the Exchange, the Company issued an additional
$80 million aggregate principal amount of CSN II at a price of $950 per $1,000
of principal. In December 2008, the Company entered into privately
negotiated agreements under which it repurchased $21.8 million in aggregate
principal amount of its outstanding CSN I at $845.38 per $1,000 of
principal. The primary purpose of this transaction was to retire the
debentures, which contained a put option exercisable on June 15, 2010, at a
discount.
- 12
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
The
following is a summary of the significant terms of CSN I and CSN
II:
CSN I - The notes
bear interest at 2.25% per annum, payable semi-annually. Holders may
convert the notes into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price of $40.29 per share, which is equivalent to a conversion ratio of 24.8219
shares per $1,000 of principal, subject to adjustment, before the close of
business on June 15, 2013 only under the following circumstances: (1) during any
fiscal quarter commencing after July 4, 2003, if the closing sale price of the
Company’s common stock exceeds 120% of the $40.29 conversion price for at least
20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the last
trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter; (2) subject to certain exceptions,
during the five business days after any five consecutive trading day period in
which the trading price per $1,000 of principal for each day of such period was
less than 98% of the product of the closing sale price of the Company’s common
stock and the number of shares issuable upon conversion of $1,000 of principal;
(3) if the notes have been called for redemption; or (4) upon the occurrence of
certain corporate events.
Beginning
June 20, 2010, the Company may redeem any of the notes at a redemption price of
100% of their principal amount, plus accrued interest. Note holders
may require the Company to repurchase their notes on June 15, 2010 or at any
time prior to their maturity following a fundamental change, as defined in the
indenture agreement, at a repurchase price of 100% of their principal amount,
plus accrued interest. The notes are subordinated in right of payment
to all of our senior indebtedness and effectively subordinated to all debts and
other liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries.
Beginning
with the six-month interest period commencing June 15, 2010, the Company will
pay additional contingent interest during any six-month interest period if the
trading price of the notes for each of the five trading days immediately
preceding the first day of the interest period equals or exceeds 120% of the
principal amount of the notes.
CSN II - The notes
bear interest at 2.25% per annum, payable semi-annually. The holders
may convert the notes into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price of $34.70 per share, which is equivalent to a conversion ratio of 28.8219
shares per $1,000 of principal. The conversion price and the
conversion ratio will adjust automatically upon certain changes to the Company’s
capitalization. CSN II notes were issued at a price of $950 per
$1,000 of principal.
The
effective interest rate of CSN II notes, which takes into consideration the
amortization of the original discount, deferred fees related to the issuance of
these notes and FSP APB 14-1 discount (See Note 2) is 8.5%. The
discount on CSN II is being amortized to the maturity date of the convertible
notes of June 15, 2013 utilizing the effective interest method. As of
April 3, 2009, the carrying amount of the discount related to the FSP APB 14-1
equity component was $36.7 million. As of April 3, 2009, the
if-converted value of CSN II notes does not exceed its principal amount as the
Company’s closing stock price of $19.71 did not exceed the conversion
price. For the first quarter of 2009, the contractual interest and
discount amortization on CSN II notes was $1.1 million and $2.2 million,
respectively, and $1.1 million and $2.1 million for the first quarter of 2008,
respectively.
- 13
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
The notes
are convertible at the option of the holders at such time as: (i) the closing
price of the Company’s common stock exceeds 150% of the conversion price of the
notes for 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days; (ii) the trading price per
$1,000 of principal is less than 98% of the product of the closing sale price of
common stock for each day during any five consecutive trading day period and the
conversion rate per $1,000 of principal; (iii) the notes have been called for
redemption; (iv) the Company distributes to all holders of common stock rights
or warrants entitling them to purchase additional shares of common stock at less
than the average closing price of common stock for the ten trading days
immediately preceding the announcement of the distribution; (v) the Company
distributes to all holders of common stock any form of dividend which has a per
share value exceeding 5% of the price of the common stock on the day prior to
such date of distribution; (vi) the Company affects a consolidation, merger,
share exchange or sale of assets pursuant to which its common stock is converted
to cash or other property; (vii) the period beginning 60 days prior to but
excluding June 15, 2013; and (viii) certain fundamental changes, as defined in
the indenture agreement, occur or are approved by the Board of
Directors.
Conversions
in connection with corporate transactions that constitute a fundamental change
require the Company to pay a premium make-whole amount, based upon a
predetermined table as set forth in the indenture agreement, whereby the
conversion ratio on the notes may be increased by up to 8.2 shares per $1,000 of
principal. The premium make-whole amount will be paid in shares of
common stock upon any such conversion, subject to the net share settlement
feature of the notes described below.
The notes
contain a net share settlement feature that requires the Company to pay cash for
each $1,000 of principal to be converted. Any amounts in excess of
$1,000 will be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock, or at the
Company’s option, cash. The Company has a one-time irrevocable
election to pay the holders in shares of its common stock, which it currently
does not plan to exercise.
The notes
are redeemable by the Company at any time on or after June 20, 2012, or at the
option of a holder upon the occurrence of certain fundamental changes, as
defined in the agreement, affecting the Company. The notes are
subordinated in right of payment to all of our senior indebtedness and
effectively subordinated to all debts and other liabilities of the Company’s
subsidiaries.
Deferred
Financing Fees - The following is a reconciliation of deferred financing
fees for the first quarter of 2009, which are included in other assets (in
thousands):
Previously
reported balance at January 2, 2009
|
$ | 4,994 | ||
FSP
APB 14-1 adjustment
|
(898 | ) | ||
Restated
amounts
|
4,096 | |||
Amortization
during the period
|
(266 | ) | ||
Balance
at April 3, 2009
|
$ | 3,830 |
- 14
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
7.
|
PENSION
PLANS
|
The
Company offers certain non-U.S. employees defined benefits under defined benefit
pension plans. Under these plans, benefits accrue to employees based
upon years of service, position, age and compensation. The liability
and corresponding expense related to these pension plans is based on actuarial
computations of current and future benefits for employees. Pension
expense is charged to current operating expenses.
|
The
change in the net pension liability for the first quarter of 2009 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
Balance
at January 2, 2009
|
$ | 5,985 | ||
Net
periodic pension cost
|
261 | |||
Foreign
currency translation
|
(238 | ) | ||
Balance
at April 3, 2009
|
$ | 6,008 |
The
Company is currently evaluating the alternatives available to reduce the
underfunded status of its defined benefit pension plans, which could include
making a cash contribution.
Net
pension cost is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April 3,
2009
|
March 28,
2008
|
|||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 210 | $ | 167 | ||||
Interest
cost
|
96 | 118 | ||||||
Amortization
of net loss
|
30 | - | ||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(75 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||
Net
pension cost
|
$ | 261 | $ | 177 |
8.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|
The
following table provides information regarding financial assets and
liabilities measured at fair value in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of April 3, 2009 (in thousands):
Fair value measurements
using
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted
|
||||||||||||||||
prices
in
|
||||||||||||||||
active
|
Significant
|
|||||||||||||||
markets
|
other
|
Significant
|
||||||||||||||
At
|
for
|
observable
|
unobservable
|
|||||||||||||
April
3,
|
identical
|
inputs
|
inputs
|
|||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
assets
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency contracts
|
$ | 426 | $ | - | $ | 426 | $ | - | ||||||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$ | 1,411 | $ | - | $ | 1,411 | $ | - |
- 15
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
Interest rate swaps -
The fair value of interest rate swaps are obtained from an independent pricing
service that utilizes cash flow models with observable market data inputs to
estimate fair value. These observable market data inputs include
LIBOR and swap rates, and credit spread curves. The Company’s
interest rate swaps are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
Foreign currency contracts - The fair
value of foreign currency contracts are obtained from an independent pricing
service that utilizes cash flow models with observable market data inputs to
estimate fair value. These observable market data inputs include
foreign exchange rate and credit spread curves. The Company’s foreign
currency contracts are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
9.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Compensation
costs related to share-based payments for the three months ended April 3, 2009
totaled $1.8 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended March 28,
2008. The following table summarizes the Company’s time-vested and
performance-vested stock option activity:
Number of
time-vested
stock options
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life
(in years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic value
(in millions)
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 2, 2009
|
1,498,294 | $ | 24.28 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
240,170 | 26.53 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(1,083 | ) | 15.00 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited
or Expired
|
(288,129 | ) | 28.12 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding
at April 3, 2009
|
1,449,252 | $ | 23.90 | 7.5 | $ | 0.4 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at April 3, 2009
|
835,392 | $ | 23.85 | 6.4 | $ | 0.4 |
Number of
performance-
vested stock
options
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life
(in years)
|
Aggregate
intrinsic value
(in millions)
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 2, 2009
|
798,564 | $ | 23.62 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited
or Expired
|
(61,743 | ) | 23.46 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding
at April 3, 2009
|
736,821 | $ | 23.64 | 8.5 | $ | 0.0 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at April 3, 2009
|
89,019 | $ | 23.60 | 6.2 | $ | 0.0 |
- 16
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
The
weighted-average fair value and assumptions used to value options granted are as
follows:
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April 3,
|
March 28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Weighted-average
fair value
|
$ | 10.49 | $ | 7.93 | ||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
1.77 | % | 2.91 | % | ||||
Expected
volatility
|
40 | % | 40 | % | ||||
Expected
life (in years)
|
6 | 5 | ||||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
0 | % | 0 | % |
The
following table summarizes the Company’s restricted stock and restricted stock
unit activity:
Weighted average
|
||||||||
Activity
|
fair value
|
|||||||
Nonvested
at January 2, 2009
|
207,765 | $ |
22.86
|
|||||
Shares
granted
|
97,858 |
26.28
|
||||||
Shares
forfeited
|
(3,901 | ) |
23.54
|
|||||
Nonvested
at April 3, 2009 (1)
|
301,722 | $ |
23.96
|
(1)
|
Includes 24,000 shares of
performance-vested restricted stock with a weighted average grant date
fair value of $23.07 per
share.
|
10.
|
OTHER
OPERATING EXPENSE
|
The
following were recorded in other operating expense, net in the Company’s
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(in thousands):
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April 3,
|
March 28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(a)
2005 & 2006 facility shutdowns and consolidations
|
$ | - | $ | 224 | ||||
(b)
2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and consolidations
|
1,899 | 106 | ||||||
(c)
Integration costs
|
863 | 660 | ||||||
Asset
dispositions and other
|
41 | 38 | ||||||
$ | 2,803 | $ | 1,028 |
(a) 2005 & 2006
facility shutdowns and consolidations. Beginning in the first
quarter of 2005 and ending in the second quarter of 2006 the Company
consolidated its medical capacitor manufacturing operations in Cheektowaga, NY,
and its implantable medical battery manufacturing operations in Clarence, NY,
into its advanced power source manufacturing facility in Alden, NY (“Alden
Facility”). The Company also consolidated its capacitor research,
development and engineering operations from its Cheektowaga, NY facility into
its technology center in Clarence, NY.
- 17
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
In the
first quarter of 2005, the Company announced its intent to close its Carson
City, NV facility and consolidate the work performed at that facility into its
Tijuana, Mexico facility. That consolidation project was completed in
the third quarter of 2007.
In the
fourth quarter of 2005, the Company announced its intent to close its Columbia,
MD facility (“Columbia Facility”) and Fremont, CA Advanced Research Laboratory
(“ARL”). The Company also announced that the manufacturing operations
at its Columbia Facility would be moved into its Tijuana Facility and that the
research, development and engineering and product development functions at its
Columbia Facility and at ARL would relocate to its technology center in
Clarence, NY. The ARL portion of this consolidation project was
completed in the fourth quarter of 2006. The Columbia Facility
portion of this consolidation project was completed in the third quarter of
2008.
During
the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company completed a plan for consolidating its
corporate and business unit organization structure. A significant
portion of the annual savings from this initiative was reinvested into research
and development activities and business growth opportunities.
The total
cost of these projects was $24.7 million, which was incurred from 2005 to 2008,
and included the following:
|
a.
|
Severance
and retention - $7.4 million;
|
|
b.
|
Production
inefficiencies, moving and revalidation - $4.6
million;
|
|
c.
|
Accelerated
depreciation and asset write-offs - $1.1
million;
|
|
d.
|
Personnel
- $8.4 million; and
|
|
e.
|
Other
- $3.2 million.
|
All
categories of costs were considered to be cash expenditures, except accelerated
depreciation and asset write-offs. All costs incurred during the
first quarter of 2008 were included in the Greatbatch Medical business
segment.
Accrued
liabilities related to the 2005 & 2006 facility shutdowns and consolidations
are comprised of the following (in thousands):
Severance
and
retention
|
Production
inefficiencies,
moving and
revalidation
|
Personnel
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 28, 2007
|
$ | 2,150 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,150 | ||||||||||
Restructuring
charges
|
159 | 42 | 184 | 278 | 663 | |||||||||||||||
Cash
payments
|
(2,234 | ) | (42 | ) | (184 | ) | (278 | ) | (2,738 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance,
January 2, 2009
|
$ | 75 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 75 | ||||||||||
Restructuring
charges
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Cash
payments
|
(45 | ) | - | - | - | (45 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
April 3, 2009
|
$ | 30 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 30 |
- 18
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Unaudited
(b) 2007 &
2008 facility shutdowns and consolidations. In the first quarter of
2007, the Company announced that it would close its Electrochem manufacturing
facility in Canton, MA and construct a new 81,000 square foot replacement
facility in Raynham, MA. This initiative was not cost savings driven
but capacity driven for the Electrochem group and was completed in the first
quarter of 2009.
In the
second quarter of 2007, the Company announced that it would consolidate its
corporate offices in Clarence, NY into its existing research and development
center also in Clarence, NY after an expansion of that facility was
complete. This expansion and relocation was completed in the third
quarter of 2008.
During
the second and third quarters of 2008, the Company reorganized and consolidated
various general and administrative and research and development functions
throughout the organization in order to optimize those resources with the
businesses it acquired in 2007 and 2008.
In the
second half of 2008, the Company ceased manufacturing at its facility in Suzhou,
China, which was acquired from EAC, and closed its leased manufacturing facility
in Orchard Park, NY, which was acquired from IntelliSensing,
LLC. Additionally, the Company consolidated its Saignelegier,
Switzerland manufacturing facility, which was acquired from
Precimed. The operations of these facilities were relocated to
existing facilities that had excess capacity. The facility in China
is being used as a procurement office.
In the
fourth quarter of 2008, management of the Company approved a plan for the
closure of its Teterboro, New Jersey (Electrochem manufacturing), Blaine,
Minnesota (Vascular Access manufacturing) and Exton, Pennsylvania (Orthopaedics
corporate office) facilities. The operations at these facilities will
be moved to other existing facilities with excess capacity.
The above
initiatives are expected to be completed over the next nine
months. The total cost for these facility shutdowns and
consolidations is expected to be approximately $14.2 million to $17.5 million,
of which $10.8 million has been incurred through April 3, 2009. The
major categories of costs include the following:
|
a.
|
Severance
and retention - $4.5 million to $5.5
million;
|
|
b.
|
Production
inefficiencies, moving and revalidation - $3.0 million to $4.0
million;
|
|
c.
|
Accelerated
depreciation and asset write-offs - $3.5 million to $4.0
million;
|
|
d.
|
Personnel
- $1.2 million to $1.5 million; and
|
|
e.
|
Other
- $2.0 million to $2.5 million.
|
All
categories of costs are considered to be cash expenditures, except accelerated
depreciation and asset write-offs. For the first quarter of 2009,
costs relating to these initiatives of $1.0 million and $0.9 million were
included in the Greatbatch Medical and Electrochem business segments,
respectively. All costs incurred during the first quarter of 2008
were included in the Electrochem business segment.
- 19
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (con’t) – Unaudited
Accrued
liabilities related to the 2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and consolidations
are comprised of the following (in thousands):
Severance
and
retention
|
Production
inefficiencies
and
revalidation
|
Accelerated
depreciation/
asset write-
offs |
Personnel
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 28, 2007
|
$ | 570 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 570 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring
charges
|
2,661 | 2,074 | 2,978 | 82 | 552 | 8,347 | ||||||||||||||||||
Write-offs
|
- | - | (2,978 | ) | - | - | (2,978 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash
payments
|
(2,637 | ) | (2,074 | ) | - | (82 | ) | (552 | ) | (5,345 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
January 2, 2009
|
$ | 594 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 594 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring
charges
|
961 | 243 | 136 | 103 | 456 | 1,899 | ||||||||||||||||||
Write-offs
|
- | - | (136 | ) | - | - | (136 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash
payments
|
(308 | ) | (243 | ) | - | (103 | ) | (456 | ) | (1,110 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
April 3, 2009
|
$ | 1,247 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,247 |
(c) Integration
costs. During the first three months of 2009 and 2008, the Company
incurred costs related to the integration of the companies acquired in 2007 and
2008. The integration initiatives include the implementation of the
Oracle ERP system, training and compliance with Company policies as well as the
implementation of lean manufacturing and six sigma initiatives. The
expenses are primarily for consultants, relocation and travel costs that will
not be required after the integrations are completed.
11.
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
The
income tax provision for interim periods is determined using an estimate of the
annual effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items, if any, that are taken
into account in the relevant period. Each quarter, the estimate of
the annual effective tax rate is updated, and if the estimated effective tax
rate changes, a cumulative adjustment is made. There is a potential
for volatility of the effective tax rate due to several factors, including
changes in the mix of the pre-tax income and the jurisdictions to which it
relates, business acquisitions, settlements with taxing authorities, and foreign
currency fluctuations.
The
effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2009 was 31.5%. This is
lower than the 35% U.S. federal statutory rate primarily as a result of
anticipated earnings of foreign subsidiaries operating in jurisdictions where
the effective tax rate is lower than in the U.S. and the estimated 2009 federal
research and development tax credit.
During
the first quarter of 2009, the balance of unrecognized tax benefits decreased
approximately $0.8 million to $4.9 million. This is a result of
favorable settlements with taxing authorities during the first
quarter. Approximately $3.4 million of the balance of unrecognized
tax benefits would favorably impact the effective tax rate (net of federal
benefit on state issues), if recognized. It is reasonably possible
that a reduction in the range of $0.8 million to $2.1 million of the balance of
unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next twelve months as a result of
potential settlements with taxing authorities and the lapse of applicable
statutes of limitation.
During
the first quarter of 2008, the balance of unrecognized tax benefits decreased
approximately $0.5 million as a result of a favorable settlement with a state
taxing authority. The settlement resulted in a cash refund of
approximately $0.3 million, including interest.
- 20
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (con’t) – Unaudited
12.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Litigation – The Company is a party to
various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. While
the Company does not believe, except as indicated below, that the ultimate
resolution of any such pending actions will have a material adverse effect on
its results of operations, financial position or cash flows, litigation is
subject to inherent uncertainties. If an unfavorable ruling were to
occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact in the period
in which the ruling occurs.
As
previously reported, on June 12, 2006, Enpath Medical, Inc. (“Enpath”), a
subsidiary of the Company, was named as defendant in a patent infringement
action filed by Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. (“Pressure Products”)
in which Pressure Products alleged that Enpath’s FlowGuard™ valved introducer,
which has been on the market for more than four years, and Enpath’s ViaSeal™
prototype introducer, which has not been sold, infringes claims in Pressure
Products patents. After trial, a jury found that Enpath infringed the
Pressure Products patents, but not willfully, and awarded damages in the amount
of $1.1 million. Enpath has appealed the judgment to the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and oral arguments were heard before that
tribunal on April 21, 2009. As a result of a post-trial motion and
pending the appeal, Enpath is permitted to continue to sell FlowGuard™ provided
that Enpath pays into an escrow fund a royalty of between $1.50 and $2.25 for
each sale of a FlowGuard™ valved introducer. The amount accrued as
escrow during the first quarter of 2009 was $0.6 million and $1.1 million in
total as of April 3, 2009. The trial court has scheduled a hearing
for June 16, 2009 to consider whether to continue to permit sales of FlowGuard™
pending the decision on the appeal.
During
2002, a former non-medical customer commenced an action alleging that Greatbatch
had used proprietary information of the customer to develop certain
products. Management believes the Company has meritorious defenses
and is vigorously defending the matter. The potential risk of loss is
up to $1.7 million.
Product
Warranties - The Company generally warrants that its products will meet
customer specifications and will be free from defects in materials and
workmanship. The Company accrues its estimated exposure to warranty
claims based upon recent historical experience and other specific information as
it becomes available.
The
change in aggregate product warranty liability for the quarter ended April 3,
2009 is as follows (in thousands):
Beginning
balance at January 2, 2009
|
$ | 1,395 | ||
Additions
to warranty reserve
|
102 | |||
Warranty
claims paid
|
(77 | ) | ||
Ending
balance at April 3, 2009
|
$ | 1,420 |
- 21
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (con’t) – Unaudited
Purchase
Commitments – Contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services
are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on the
Company and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum
quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the
approximate timing of the transaction. Our purchase orders are
normally based on our current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by our
vendors within short time horizons. We enter into blanket orders with
vendors that have preferred pricing and terms, however these orders are normally
cancelable by us without penalty. As of April 3, 2009, the total
contractual obligation related to such expenditures is approximately $15.6
million and will be financed by existing cash and cash equivalents or cash
generated from operations over the next twelve months. We also enter
into contracts for outsourced services; however, the obligations under these
contracts were not significant and the contracts generally contain clauses
allowing for cancellation without significant penalty.
Operating
Leases - The Company is a party to various operating lease agreements for
buildings, equipment and software. Minimum future annual operating
lease payments are $2.0 million for the remainder of 2009; $2.2 million in 2010;
$1.9 million in 2011; $1.8 million in 2012; $1.7 million in 2013 and $3.0
million thereafter. The Company primarily leases buildings, which
accounts for the majority of the future lease payments.
Foreign Currency
Contracts - In December 2007, the Company entered into a
forward contract to purchase 80,000,000 CHF, at an exchange rate of 1.1389 CHF
per one U.S. dollar, in order to partially fund the purchase price of P Medical
Holdings SA (“Precimed”), which was payable in Swiss Francs. In
January 2008, the Company entered into an additional forward contract to
purchase 20,000,000 CHF at an exchange rate of 1.1156 per one U.S.
dollar. The Company entered into a similar foreign exchange contract
in January 2008 in order to fund the purchase price of the DePuy Orthopaedics’
Chaumont, France facility (the “Chaumont Facility”), which was payable in
Euros. The net result of the above contracts, which were settled upon
the funding of the respective acquisitions, was a gain of $2.4 million, $1.6
million of which was recorded in the first quarter of 2008 as Other Income,
Net.
In
February 2009, the Company entered into a forward contract to purchase 10
million Mexican pesos per month from March 2009 to December 2009 at an exchange
rate of 14.85 pesos per one U.S. dollar. This contract was entered
into in order to hedge the risk of peso-denominated payments associated with the
operations at the Company’s Tijuana, Mexico facility. This contract
was accounted for as a cash flow hedge and had a fair value of $0.4 million as
of April 3, 2009, which is recorded within Other Assets in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets. No portion of the change in fair value
of the foreign currency contracts during the first three months of 2009 was
considered ineffective.
- 22
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (con’t) – Unaudited
13.
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
The
following table reflects the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share
(in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April 3,
|
March 28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Numerator
for basic earnings per share:
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 6,664 | $ | (4,445 | ) | |||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||
Interest
expense on convertible notes and related deferred financing fees, net of
tax
|
130 | - | ||||||
Numerator
for diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
$ | 6,794 | $ | (4,445 | ) | |||
Denominator
for basic earnings (loss) per share:
|
||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
22,814 | 22,386 | ||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||
Convertible
subordinated notes
|
756 | - | ||||||
Stock
options and unvested restricted stock
|
329 | - | ||||||
Dilutive
potential common shares
|
1,085 | - | ||||||
Denominator
for diluted earnings per share
|
23,899 | 22,386 | ||||||
Basic
earnings (loss) per share
|
$ | 0.29 | $ | (0.20 | ) | |||
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share
|
$ | 0.28 | $ | (0.20 | ) |
The
diluted weighted average share calculations do not include the following
securities, which are not dilutive to the EPS calculations:
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April 3,
|
March 28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Time based stock options,
restricted stock and restricted stock units
|
1,510,000 | 2,218,000 | ||||||
Performance
based stock options
|
510,000 | 276,000 | ||||||
Convertible
subordinated notes
|
- | 1,296,000 |
14.
|
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)
|
The
Company’s comprehensive income (loss) as reported in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) includes net income,
foreign currency translations gains (losses), unrealized gain (loss) on its cash
flow hedges and, for 2008, the net unrealized gain on short-term investments
available for sale, adjusted for any realized gains/losses.
- 23
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (con’t) – Unaudited
The
Company translates all assets and liabilities of its foreign subsidiaries, where
the U.S. dollar is not the functional currency, at the period-end exchange rate
and translates income and expenses at the average exchange rates in effect
during the period. The net effect of these translation adjustments is
recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements as comprehensive
income (loss). Translation adjustments are not adjusted for income
taxes as they relate to permanent investments in the Company’s foreign
subsidiaries.
The
Company has designated its interest rate swaps and foreign currency contracts -
see Notes 6 and 12 - as cash flow hedges under SFAS No.
133. Accordingly, the effective portion of any change in the fair
value of these instruments is recorded in comprehensive income (loss), net of
tax, and reclassified into earnings (Interest Expense – Swaps, Cost of Sales –
Excluding Amortization of Intangible Assets – FX Contract) in the same period or
periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and
losses on the derivative representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
current earnings.
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss is comprised of the following (in
thousands):
Defined
|
Foreign
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
benefit
|
currency
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
pension plan
|
Cash flow
|
translation
|
Total pre-tax
|
Net-of tax-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
liability
|
hedges
|
adjustment
|
amount
|
Tax amount
|
amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at January 2, 2009
|
$ | (2,513 | ) | $ | (1,394 | ) | $ | (228 | ) | $ | (4,135 | ) | $ | 1,059 | $ | (3,076 | ) | |||||||
Unrealized
gain on cash flow hedges
|
- | 409 | - | 409 | (143 | ) | 266 | |||||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
- | - | (3,917 | ) | (3,917 | ) | - | (3,917 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Balance
at April 3, 2009
|
$ | (2,513 | ) | $ | (985 | ) | $ | (4,145 | ) | $ | (7,643 | ) | $ | 916 | $ | (6,727 | ) |
15.
|
BUSINESS
SEGMENT, GEOGRAPHIC AND CONCENTRATION RISK
INFORMATION
|
The
Company operates its business in two reportable segments – Greatbatch Medical
and Electrochem Solutions (“Electrochem”). During the first quarter
of 2009, the Company rebranded its Implantable Medical Component (“IMC”) segment
as Greatbatch Medical. The Greatbatch Medical segment designs and
manufactures components and devices for the CRM, Neuromodulation, Vascular
Access and Orthopaedic markets. Additionally, the Greatbatch Medical
business offers value-added assembly and design engineering services for
products that incorporate Greatbatch Medical components.
Electrochem
is a world leader in the design, manufacture and distribution of electrochemical
cells, battery packs and wireless sensors for demanding applications in markets
such as energy, security, portable medical, environmental monitoring and
more.
The
Company defines segment income from operations as sales less cost of sales
including amortization and expenses attributable to segment-specific selling,
general and administrative, research, development and engineering expenses, and
other operating expenses. Segment income also includes a portion of
non-segment specific selling, general and administrative, and research,
development and engineering expenses based on allocations appropriate to the
expense categories. The remaining unallocated operating expenses are
primarily corporate headquarters and administrative function
expenses. The unallocated operating expenses along with other income
and expense are not allocated to reportable segments. Transactions
between the two segments are not significant. The 2008 results for
the Greatbatch Medical segment include $6.4 million and $2.2 million of
inventory step-up amortization and IPR&D expense, respectively, related to
its 2007 and 2008 acquisitions.
- 24
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (con’t) – Unaudited
An
analysis and reconciliation of the Company’s business segment information to the
respective information in the condensed consolidated financial statements is as
follows (in thousands):
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April 3,
|
March 28,
|
|||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Sales:
|
||||||||
Greatbatch
Medical
|
||||||||
CRM/Neuromodulation
|
$ | 77,267 | $ | 65,164 | ||||
Vascular
Access
|
10,733 | 9,567 | ||||||
Orthopaedic
|
34,083 | 27,786 | ||||||
Total
Greatbatch Medical
|
122,083 | 102,517 | ||||||
Electrochem
|
17,735 | 19,637 | ||||||
Total
sales
|
$ | 139,818 | $ | 122,154 | ||||
Segment
income (loss) from operations:
|
||||||||
Greatbatch
Medical
|
$ | 16,638 | $ | (1,223 | ) | |||
Electrochem
|
1,395 | 2,276 | ||||||
Total
segment income from operations
|
18,033 | 1,053 | ||||||
Unallocated
operating expenses
|
(3,234 | ) | (5,193 | ) | ||||
Operating
income (loss) as reported
|
14,799 | (4,140 | ) | |||||
Unallocated
other expense
|
(5,071 | ) | (3,225 | ) | ||||
Income
(loss) before provision (benefit) for
|
||||||||
income
taxes as reported
|
$ | 9,728 | $ | (7,365 | ) |
Sales by
geographic area are presented in the following table by allocating sales from
external customers based on where the products are shipped to (in
thousands):
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April 3,
|
March 28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Sales
by geographic area:
|
||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 71,222 | $ | 63,171 | ||||
Non-Domestic
locations:
|
||||||||
France
|
19,704 | 13,499 | ||||||
United
Kingdom
|
15,372 | 15,394 | ||||||
Puerto
Rico
|
15,319 | 12,499 | ||||||
Rest
of world
|
18,201 | 17,591 | ||||||
Consolidated
sales
|
$ | 139,818 | $ | 122,154 |
- 25
-
GREATBATCH,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (con’t) – Unaudited
Long-lived
tangible assets by geographic area are as follows:
As
of
|
||||||||
April
3,
|
January
2,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2009
|
|||||||
Long-lived
tangible assets:
|
||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 141,334 | $ | 141,733 | ||||
Non-Domestic
locations
|
39,548 | 42,119 | ||||||
Consolidated
long-lived assets
|
$ | 180,882 | $ | 183,852 |
Four
customers accounted for a significant portion of the Company’s sales as
follows:
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April 3,
|
March 28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Customer
A
|
21 | % | 18 | % | ||||
Customer
B
|
15 | % | 14 | % | ||||
Customer
C
|
12 | % | 10 | % | ||||
Customer
D
|
11 | % | 13 | % | ||||
Total
|
59 | % | 55 | % |
Concentration of
Credit Risk - Included in accounts receivable as of April 3, 2009 is a
$14.3 million value added tax (“VAT”) receivable with the French government
related to inventory purchases for the Chaumont Facility. Subsequent
to the end of the first quarter, the Company received approval for the payment
of $6.4 million of this receivable, which is expected to be collected in the
second quarter of 2009. The remaining balance of this receivable is
now subject to the normal VAT payment cycle, generally 30 – 60 days after filing
the claim. This receivable is denominated in Euros and is subject to
foreign currency risk, which could be material.
16.
|
IMPACT
OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS
|
In
December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers' Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” This FSP provides
guidance on disclosures about plan assets of defined benefit pension or other
postretirement plans and requires more transparency about the assets held by
retirement plan and the concentrations of risk in those plans. This
FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2009. Accordingly, the Company will make the disclosures required by
this FSP beginning in fiscal year 2010.
- 26
-
ITEM
2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Our
Business
Greatbatch,
Inc. is a leading developer and manufacturer of critical products used in
medical devices for the cardiac rhythm management (“CRM”), neuromodulation,
vascular, orthopaedic and interventional radiology
markets. Additionally, Greatbatch, Inc. is a world leader in the
design, manufacture and distribution of electrochemical cells, battery packs and
wireless sensors for demanding applications in markets such as energy, security,
portable medical, environmental monitoring and more. When used in
this report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” mean Greatbatch, Inc.
and its subsidiaries. We believe that our proprietary technology,
close customer relationships, multiple product offerings, market leadership and
dedication to quality provide us with competitive advantages and create a
barrier to entry for potential market entrants.
We
operate our business in two reportable segments – Greatbatch Medical and
Electrochem Solutions (“Electrochem”). During the first quarter of
2009, we rebranded our Implantable Medical Component (“IMC”) segment as
Greatbatch Medical. The Greatbatch Medical segment designs and
manufactures components and devices for the CRM, Neuromodulation, Vascular
Access and Orthopaedic markets. These include batteries, capacitors,
filtered feedthroughs, engineered components and enclosures used in Implantable
Medical Devices (“IMDs”) and more recently hip and knee replacement, trauma and
spine as well as hip and shoulder implants and introducers, catheters,
implantable stimulation leads and microcomponents. Additionally, the
Greatbatch Medical business offers value-added assembly and design engineering
services for products that incorporate Greatbatch Medical
components.
Electrochem
is a world leader in the design, manufacture and distribution of electrochemical
cells, battery packs and wireless sensors for demanding applications in markets
such as energy, security, portable medical, environmental monitoring and
more.
Our
Customers
Our
Greatbatch Medical customers include leading Original Equipment Manufacturers
(“OEM”), in alphabetical order here and throughout this report, such as
Biotronik, Boston Scientific, DePuy, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Smith
& Nephew, the Sorin Group, St. Jude Medical, Stryker and Zimmer Holdings,
Inc. The nature and extent of our selling relationships with each
Greatbatch Medical customer are different in terms of breadth of products
purchased, purchased product volumes, length of contractual commitment, ordering
patterns, inventory management and selling prices. During the first
quarter of 2009, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic and St.
Jude Medical collectively accounted for 59% of our total sales.
Our
Electrochem customers are primarily companies in markets such as energy,
security, portable medical and environmental monitoring including Halliburton
Company, Weatherford International, General Electric, Thales, Zoll Medical Corp.
and Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
Financial
Overview
Consolidated
sales in the first quarter of 2009 were $139.8 million, an increase of 14% over
the comparable 2008 period. This growth was driven by CRM and Neuromodulation
revenue and the benefit of a full quarter of Orthopaedic operations ($8 million)
as compared to the first quarter 2008. Partially offsetting these
increases were lower Electrochem revenue due to a slow-down in the energy
markets and approximately $3 million of foreign currency impact on our
Orthopaedic sales. Organic constant currency growth for the quarter was
approximately 10%. Our revenue is significantly impacted each quarter
due to the timing of various customer product launches, shifts in customer
market share, customer inventory management initiatives as well as marketplace
field actions.
- 27
-
Operating
income increased to $14.8 million for the first quarter of 2009 compared to a
loss of $4.1 million for the first quarter of 2008. Operating income
for the first quarter of 2009 included $2.8 million of acquisition related
charges, consolidation costs and integration expenses compared to $1.0 million
for the same period in 2008. We have initiated various consolidation
initiatives aimed at streamlining our operations and improving operating
profitability. The progress made on these initiatives can be seen by
the improvement in operating margin since the first quarter of
2008.
As of the
end of the first quarter of 2009, cash and cash equivalents totaled $15.1
million. These funds along with the cash generated from operations and the $104
million available under our line of credit are sufficient to meet our operating
and investment activities for the foreseeable future, including the cash
expenditures relating to our consolidation initiatives. During the
first quarter of 2009, we repaid $1 million of our long-term debt as, consistent
with our expectations, cash flows from operations for the first quarter of 2009
were approximately break-even due to a one-time contractual raw material
inventory purchase related to the acquisition of our Chaumont France
facility.
Our CEO’s
View
This was
another solid quarter for Greatbatch, as we continued the momentum with which we
finished 2008. Our revenue growth was driven by our Greatbatch
Medical division, and is a result of the progress we have made on our strategic
goals. The integration of our acquisitions continues to benefit the
Company, including higher growth in new markets and cross selling opportunities
across a broader customer base. Additionally, we launched a new
branding initiative to unify our existing businesses under a common vision and
consolidated our medical entities under a single brand — “Greatbatch
Medical.”
While we
certainly are not immune to the impact of the strained economic environment,
particularly as evidenced by the pressure on our Electrochem business, our
performance demonstrates the success of our balanced approach to diversifying
our revenue base, continuously generating value through operating performance
improvements, and delivering innovative new products to our
customers.
Product
Development
Currently,
we are developing a series of new products for customer applications in the
CRM/Neuromodulation, Vascular Access, Orthopaedic and commercial power
markets. Some of the key development initiatives
include:
|
1.
|
Continue
the evolution of our Q series high rate ICD
batteries;
|
|
2.
|
Continue
development of MRI compatible
components;
|
|
3.
|
Continue
development of higher energy/higher density
capacitors;
|
|
4.
|
Integrate
Biomimetic coating technology with therapy delivery
devices;
|
|
5.
|
Complete
design of next generation steerable
catheters;
|
|
6.
|
Further
minimally invasive surgical techniques for orthopaedics
industry;
|
|
7.
|
Develop
disposable instrumentation;
|
|
8.
|
Provide
wireless sensing solutions to Electrochem customers;
and
|
|
9.
|
Develop
a charging platform for commercial secondary
offering.
|
Approximately
$2.3 million of the BIOMEC, Inc. (“BIOMEC”) acquisition purchase price in April
2007 was allocated to the estimated fair value of acquired in-process research
and development (“IPR&D”) projects that had not yet reached technological
feasibility and had no alternative future use as of the acquisition
date. The value assigned to IPR&D relates to projects that
incorporate BIOMEC’s novel-polymer coating (biomimetic) technology that
mimics the surface of endothelial cells of blood vessels. An
agreement was reached in 2008 with an OEM partner to provide coating material
and services for their catheter products. The 510(k) application was
submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and we received clearance
to market this product during the first quarter of 2009. There have
been no significant changes from our original estimates with regard to these
projects.
- 28
-
Approximately
$13.8 million of the Enpath Medical, Inc. (“Enpath”) acquisition purchase price
in June 2007 was allocated to the estimated fair value of acquired IPR&D
projects that had not yet reached technological feasibility and had no
alternative future use. These projects primarily represent the next
generation of introducer and catheter products already being sold by Enpath
which incorporate new enhancements and customer modifications. One
introducer project was launched near the end of 2008. We expect to
commercially launch the other introducer products under development in 2009
which will replace existing products. These introducer projects
acquired have been delayed due to timing of customer adoption and transition and
technical difficulties of some of the projects. Additionally, future
sales from our ViaSealTM
introducer project have been enjoined due to litigation (See
“Litigation”). The catheter IPR&D project, to which a portion of
the Enpath purchase price was allocated, has been put on hold indefinitely in
order to allocate resources to other projects. These delays in
introducer and catheter projects are not expected to have a material impact on
our results of operations.
Approximately
$2.2 million of the P Medical Holding SA (“Precimed”) acquisition purchase price
was allocated to the preliminary estimated fair value of acquired IPR&D
projects that had not yet reached technological feasibility and had no
alternative future use. The value assigned to IPR&D related to
Reamer, Instrument Kit, Locking Plate and Cutting Guide
projects. These projects primarily represent the next generation of
products already being sold by Precimed which incorporate new enhancements and
customer modifications. We commercially launched a portion of
these products in 2008 and expect to launch others in 2009. Several
of the other orthopaedic projects acquired have been delayed and two have
been cancelled due to the timing of customer adoption, technical difficulties,
inability to meet margin goals and feasibility assessments. These changes
are not expected to have a material impact on operating income as these projects
have lower margins associated with them.
Cost Savings and
Consolidation Efforts
From 2005
to 2008, we recorded charges in other operating expenses related to our ongoing
cost savings and consolidation efforts. Additional information is set
forth in Note 10 – “Other Operating Expense” of the Notes to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report.
2005 & 2006
facility shutdowns and consolidations - Beginning in the first quarter of
2005 and ending in the second quarter of 2006 we consolidated our medical
capacitor manufacturing operations in Cheektowaga, NY, and our implantable
medical battery manufacturing operations in Clarence, NY, into our advanced
power source manufacturing facility in Alden, NY (“Alden
Facility”). We also consolidated our capacitor research, development
and engineering operations from our Cheektowaga, NY facility into our technology
center in Clarence, NY.
In the
first quarter of 2005, we announced our intent to close our Carson City, NV
facility and consolidate the work performed at that facility into our Tijuana,
Mexico facility. That consolidation project was completed in the
third quarter of 2007.
In the
fourth quarter of 2005, we announced our intent to close our Columbia, MD
facility (“Columbia Facility”) and Fremont, CA Advanced Research Laboratory
(“ARL”). We also announced that the manufacturing operations at our
Columbia Facility would be moved into our Tijuana Facility and that the
research, development and engineering and product development functions at our
Columbia Facility and at ARL would relocate to our technology center in
Clarence, NY. The ARL portion of this consolidation project was
completed in the fourth quarter of 2006. The Columbia Facility
portion of this consolidation project was completed in the third quarter of
2008.
- 29
-
During
the fourth quarter of 2006, we completed a plan for consolidating our
corporate and business unit organization structure. A significant
portion of the annual savings from this initiative was reinvested into research
and development activities and business growth opportunities.
The total
cost of these projects was $24.7 million, which was incurred from 2005 to 2008,
and included the following:
a.
|
Severance
and retention - $7.4 million;
|
b.
|
Production
inefficiencies, moving and revalidation - $4.6
million;
|
c.
|
Accelerated
depreciation and asset write-offs - $1.1
million;
|
d.
|
Personnel
- $8.4 million; and
|
e.
|
Other
- $3.2 million.
|
All
categories of costs were considered to be cash expenditures, except accelerated
depreciation and asset write-offs. All costs incurred during the
first quarter of 2008 were included in the Greatbatch Medical business
segment.
2007 & 2008
facility shutdowns and consolidations - In the first quarter of 2007, we
announced that we would close our Electrochem manufacturing facility in Canton,
MA and construct a new 81,000 square foot replacement facility in Raynham,
MA. This initiative was not cost savings driven but capacity driven
for the Electrochem group and was completed in the first quarter of
2009.
In the
second quarter of 2007, we announced that we would consolidate our corporate
offices in Clarence, NY into our existing research and development center also
in Clarence, NY after an expansion of that facility was
complete. This expansion and relocation was completed in the third
quarter of 2008.
During
the second and third quarters of 2008, we reorganized and consolidated various
general and administrative and research and development functions throughout the
organization in order to optimize those resources with the businesses we
acquired in 2007 and 2008.
In the
second half of 2008, we ceased manufacturing at our facility in Suzhou, China,
which was acquired from Engineered Assemblies Corporation, and closed our leased
manufacturing facility in Orchard Park, NY, which was acquired from
IntelliSensing LLC. Additionally, we consolidated our Saignelegier,
Switzerland manufacturing facility, which was acquired from
Precimed. The operations of these facilities were relocated to
existing facilities that had excess capacity. The facility in China
is being used as a procurement office.
In the
fourth quarter of 2008, we approved a plan for the closure of our Teterboro, New
Jersey (Electrochem manufacturing), Blaine, Minnesota (Vascular Access
manufacturing) and Exton, Pennsylvania (Orthopaedics corporate office)
facilities. The operations at these facilities will be moved to other
existing facilities with excess capacity.
The above
initiatives are expected to be completed over the next nine
months. The total cost for these facility shutdowns and
consolidations is expected to be approximately $14.2 million to $17.5 million,
of which $10.8 million has been incurred through April 3, 2009.
The major
categories of costs include the following:
a.
|
Severance
and retention - $4.5 million to $5.5
million;
|
b.
|
Production
inefficiencies, moving and revalidation - $3.0 million to $4.0
million;
|
c.
|
Accelerated
depreciation and asset write-offs - $3.5 million to $4.0
million;
|
d.
|
Personnel
- $1.2 million to $1.5 million; and
|
e.
|
Other
- $2.0 million to $2.5 million.
|
- 30
-
All
categories of costs are considered to be cash expenditures, except accelerated
depreciation and asset write-offs. For the first quarter of 2009,
costs relating to these initiatives of $1.0 million and $0.9 million were
included in the Greatbatch Medical and Electrochem business segments,
respectively. All costs incurred during the first quarter of 2008
were included in the Electrochem business segment.
Our Financial
Results
We
utilize a fifty-two, fifty-three week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest
December 31st. For 52-week years, each quarter contains 13
weeks. The first quarter of 2009 and 2008 ended on April 3, and March
28, respectively. The commentary that follows should be read in
conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related
notes and with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations contained in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 2, 2009.
During
the first quarter of 2009, we were required to adopt Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position (“FSP”) APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments that May be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement).” This FSP requires issuers of convertible debt
instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion, such as the Company’s
CSN II as described in Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in this report, to separately account for the liability and
equity components of those instruments in a manner that will reflect the
entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in
subsequent periods. This FSP requires retrospective restatement for
all prior periods presented in financial statements. Accordingly, the
2008 Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented in this report have
been retroactively adjusted to reflect the accounting for FSP APB 14-1 as if it
were in effect as of the date CSN II was originally issued. See Note
2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 31
-
Three months ended
|
||||||||||||||||
April 3,
|
March 28,
|
$
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
In thousands, except per share
data
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change
|
Change
|
||||||||||||
Greatbatch
Medical
|
||||||||||||||||
CRM/Neuromodulation
|
$ | 77,267 | $ | 65,164 | $ | 12,103 | 19 | % | ||||||||
Vascular
Access
|
10,733 | 9,567 | 1,166 | 12 | % | |||||||||||
Orthopaedic
|
34,083 | 27,786 | 6,297 | 23 | % | |||||||||||
Total
Greatbatch Medical
|
122,083 | 102,517 | 19,566 | 19 | % | |||||||||||
Electrochem
|
17,735 | 19,637 | (1,902 | ) | -10 | % | ||||||||||
Total
sales
|
139,818 | 122,154 | 17,664 | 14 | % | |||||||||||
Cost
of sales - excluding amortization of intangible assets
|
93,954 | 93,745 | 209 | 0 | % | |||||||||||
Cost
of sales - amortization of intangible assets
|
1,700 | 1,710 | (10 | ) | -1 | % | ||||||||||
Total
Cost of Sales
|
95,654 | 95,455 | 199 | 0 | % | |||||||||||
Cost
of sales as a % of sales
|
68.4 | % | 78.1 | % | -9.7 | % | ||||||||||
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses (SG&A)
|
18,687 | 18,347 | 340 | 2 | % | |||||||||||
SG&A
as a % of sales
|
13.4 | % | 15.0 | % | -1.6 | % | ||||||||||
Research,
development and engineering costs, net (RD&E)
|
7,875 | 9,224 | (1,349 | ) | -15 | % | ||||||||||
RD&E
as a % of sales
|
5.6 | % | 7.6 | % | -2.0 | % | ||||||||||
Other
operating expense, net
|
2,803 | 3,268 | (465 | ) | -14 | % | ||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
14,799 | (4,140 | ) | 18,939 | N/A | |||||||||||
Operating
margin
|
10.6 | % | -3.4 | % | 14.0 | % | ||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
4,889 | 5,078 | (189 | ) | -4 | % | ||||||||||
Interest
income
|
(25 | ) | (396 | ) | 371 | 94 | % | |||||||||
Other
(income) expense, net
|
207 | (1,457 | ) | 1,664 | N/A | |||||||||||
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
3,064 | (2,920 | ) | 5,984 | N/A | |||||||||||
Effective
tax rate
|
31.5 | % | 39.6 | % | -8.2 | % | ||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 6,664 | $ | (4,445 | ) | $ | 11,109 | N/A | ||||||||
Net
margin
|
4.8 | % | -3.6 | % | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share
|
$ | 0.28 | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 0.48 | N/A |
- 32
-
Sales
Greatbatch
Medical - The nature and extent of
our selling relationship with each OEM customer is different in terms of
component products purchased, selling prices, product volumes, ordering patterns
and inventory management. We have pricing arrangements with our
customers that at times do not specify minimum order quantities. Our
visibility to customer ordering patterns is over a relatively short period of
time. Our customers may have inventory management programs and
alternate supply arrangements of which we are unaware. Additionally,
the relative market share among the OEM manufacturers changes
periodically. Consequently, these and other factors can significantly
impact our sales in any given period.
Our
customers may initiate field actions with respect to market-released
products. These actions may include product recalls or communications
with a significant number of physicians about a product or labeling
issue. The scope of such actions can range from very minor issues
affecting a small number of units to more significant actions. There
are a number of factors, both short-term and long-term, related to these field
actions that may impact our results. In the short-term, if a product
has to be replaced, or customer inventory levels have to be restored, component
demand will increase. Also, changing customer order patterns due to
market share shifts or accelerated device replacements may also have a positive
or negative impact on our sales results in the near-term. These same
factors may have longer-term implications as well. Customer inventory
levels may ultimately have to be rebalanced to match demand.
Greatbatch
Medical sales increased 19% for the first quarter of 2009 when compared to the
same period of 2008. This growth was driven by CRM and
Neuromodulation revenue and the benefit of a full quarter of Orthopaedic
operations ($8 million) as compared to the first quarter
2008. Offsetting that increase was approximately $3 million of
foreign currency impact on our Orthopaedic sales. Greatbatch Medical
organic constant currency growth for the quarter was approximately
13%.
CRM and
Neuromodulation revenue of $77.3 million for the quarter increased 19% over the
prior year. The first quarter’s results benefited from strong
feedthrough, coated component and medical battery revenue partially offset by
lower capacitor sales. CRM revenue is significantly impacted each
quarter due to the timing of various customer product launches, shifts in
customer market share, customer inventory management initiatives as well as
marketplace field actions. Additionally, CRM revenue is impacted by
the overall market growth for implantable devices. Given the current
market conditions we anticipate that our customers will continue to aggressively
manage inventory levels for the remainder of 2009. We continuously
work with our customers to provide them cost effective technological advances to
enable them to bring solutions to market, which ultimately drives our revenue
growth.
First
quarter revenues for the Vascular Access product line were $10.7 million,
compared to the prior year quarter revenues of $9.6 million. This
increase was primarily due to higher sales of introducer products due to
customer inventory builds, which may impact revenues for the remainder of the
year, partially offset by lower catheter revenue.
Orthopaedic
product line revenues were $34.1 million for the quarter compared to $27.8
million for first quarter 2008. First quarter year over year
comparisons for Orthopaedic sales include the benefit of a full quarter of
revenues from the acquisitions completed during the first quarter of 2008 of
approximately $8 million, partially offset by foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations of approximately $3 million and the effect of current market
conditions. Orthopaedic sales during the first three quarters of 2008
benefited from the release of excess backlog that was on hand at the time of the
Precimed acquisition, which has since been fulfilled.
- 33
-
Electrochem - We have pricing
arrangements with our customers that many times do not specify minimum
quantities. Our visibility to customer ordering patterns is over a
relatively short period of time.
First
quarter 2009 sales for the Electrochem business segment were $17.7 million,
compared to $19.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. The decrease
in sales was a result of current market conditions, which caused customers to
reduce inventory levels and push back projects, primarily in our energy
markets. We continue to actively manage our business so that we will
be better suited to meet the needs of our customers once the markets
recover.
2009 Sales Outlook - We continue to expect
our full year 2009 sales will be in the range of $550 million to $600
million. This revenue projection assumes that we will continue to
grow faster than our underlying market by leveraging our diversified revenue
base and our strength in the development and manufacturing of custom
technologies for our customers. These growth projections may be impacted
by a variety of factors including a softening in the orthopaedic and commercial
energy markets, potential delays in elective surgeries, the current
financial market unrest, changes in exchange rates and changes in the health
care reimbursement policies. Within the markets we serve, the
orthopaedic market represents the least predictable market due to the elective
nature of many of the surgeries and procedures in which our products are
used.
Cost
of sales
Changes
from the prior year to cost of sales as a percentage of sales were primarily due
to the following:
Three months ended
|
||||
April 3, 2009
|
||||
Inventory
step-up amortization(a)
|
-5.3%
|
|||
Lower
excess capacity (b)
|
-3.7%
|
|||
Foreign
currency (c)
|
-0.5%
|
|||
Other
|
-0.2%
|
|||
Total
percentage point change to cost of sales as a percentage of
sales
|
-9.7%
|
(a)
|
In
connection with our acquisitions in the first quarter of 2008 and fourth
quarter of 2007, the value of inventory on hand was stepped-up to reflect
the fair value at the time of acquisition. The amortization of
inventory step-up, which is recorded as Cost of Sales – Excluding
Intangible Amortization, was $6.4 million. As of the end of the
first quarter of 2008, there was no additional inventory step-up remaining
to be amortized.
|
(b)
|
This
decrease in cost of sales as a percent of sales is primarily due to lower
excess capacity as a result of higher production of Greatbatch Medical
products (mainly coated components and feedthroughs), which absorbed a
higher amount of fixed costs such as plant overhead and
depreciation. Additionally, our cost of sales percentage
benefited from our plant consolidations in 2008, which further reduced our
excess capacity.
|
(c)
|
Due
to the volatility in the markets, during the first quarter of 2009 the
value of the U.S. dollar strengthened significantly in comparison to the
Mexican Peso. This foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation
resulted in a lower cost of sales as a percentage of sales at our Tijuana
Mexico facility which has Peso denominated expenses but sales which are in
U.S. Dollars. The Company should continue to realize this
benefit for the remainder of 2009 as a result of the Mexican Peso foreign
currency contract entered into in February 2009. See Note 12 –
“Commitments and Contingencies” of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q for additional information about
our foreign currency contracts.
|
We expect
our cost of sales as a percentage of sales to decrease over the next several
years as a result of our “Lean” initiatives and continued consolidation
efforts. Additionally, in the long term new product
introductions resulting from current research and development efforts will help
drive margin expansion.
- 34
-
SG&A
expenses
Changes
from the prior year to SG&A expenses were due to the following (in
thousands):
Three months ended
|
||||
April 3, 2009
|
||||
Litigation
fees
(a)
|
$ | (626 | ) | |
Rebranding
initiative (b)
|
255 | |||
Personnel
costs (c)
|
635 | |||
Other
|
76 | |||
Net
increase in SG&A
|
$ | 340 |
(a)
|
Amount
represents decreased costs incurred in connection with a patent
infringement action which went to trial in 2008 – see
“Litigation.”
|
(b)
|
During
the first quarter of 2009, we launched a new branding initiative to unify
our existing businesses under a common vision and consolidated our medical
entities under a single brand — “Greatbatch Medical.” These
increased costs primarily relate to consulting costs and the replacement
of collateral material in connection with this new branding
initiative.
|
(c)
|
Amount
represents costs associated with employee merit increases as well as
increased sales and marketing headcount, as we invested in our sales force
in order to drive future revenue
growth.
|
SG&A
expenses as a percentage of sales decreased 160 basis points to 13.4% compared
to the first quarter 2008. This improvement reflects the various cost
cutting and integration initiatives implemented over the last twelve months and
our efforts to leverage our current operations.
RD&E
expenses
Net
RD&E costs are as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April 3,
|
March 28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Research
and development costs
|
$ | 4,501 | $ | 5,445 | ||||
Engineering
costs
|
5,956 | 5,912 | ||||||
Less
cost reimbursements
|
(2,582 | ) | (2,133 | ) | ||||
Engineering
costs, net
|
3,374 | 3,779 | ||||||
Total
research and development and engineering costs, net
|
$ | 7,875 | $ | 9,224 |
The
decrease in total RD&E costs for the first quarter of 2009 was primarily a
result of the realignment of these functions in the second quarter of
2008. Reimbursement on product development projects is dependent upon
the timing of the achievement of milestones and are netted against gross
spending. We expect RD&E to increase as a percentage of sales for
the remainder of 2009 as we continue to invest resources in the development of
new technologies in order to provide solutions to our customers and ultimately
drive long-term growth.
- 35
-
Other
Operating Expense
Acquired
IPR&D - Approximately $2.2
million of the Precimed purchase price represents the estimated fair value of
IPR&D projects acquired. These projects had not yet reached
technological feasibility and had no alternative future use as of the
acquisition date, thus were immediately expensed on the date of
acquisition.
The
remaining other operating expenses are comprised of the following costs (in
thousands):
Three months ended
|
||||||||
April 3,
|
March 28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(a)
2005 & 2006 facility shutdowns and consolidations
|
$ | - | $ | 224 | ||||
(a)
2007 & 2008 facility shutdowns and consolidations
|
1,899 | 106 | ||||||
(b)
Integration costs
|
863 | 660 | ||||||
Asset
dispositions and other
|
41 | 38 | ||||||
$ | 2,803 | $ | 1,028 |
(a)
|
Refer
to the “Cost Savings and Consolidation Efforts” discussion for disclosure
related to the timing and level of remaining expenditures for these items
as of April 3, 2009.
|
(b)
|
For
the first quarter of 2009 and 2008, we incurred costs related to the
integration of the companies acquired in 2007 and 2008. The
integration initiatives include the implementation of the Oracle ERP
system, training and compliance with policies as well as the
implementation of lean manufacturing and six sigma
initiatives. The expenses are primarily for consultants,
relocation and travel costs that will not be required after the
integrations are completed.
|
In 2009,
consolidation and integration expenses are expected to be approximately $10
million to $13 million.
Interest
expense and interest income
Interest
expense and interest income for the first quarter of 2009 decreased in
comparison to the same period of 2008 primarily due to lower rates paid/earned
on the outstanding balances resulting from the lower interest rate environment
in 2009 compared to 2008, as well as lower outstanding principal balances on our
investment securities. We expect interest expense to gradually
decline as we use excess cash flow from operations to pay down long-term
debt.
Other
(income) expense, net
Gain on foreign currency
contracts - In December 2007, we entered into a forward contract to
purchase 80,000,000 Swiss Francs (“CHF”), at an exchange rate of 1.1389 CHF per
one U.S. dollar, in order to partially fund our acquisition of Precimed, which
was payable in Swiss Francs. In January 2008, we entered into an
additional forward contract to purchase 20,000,000 CHF at an exchange rate of
1.1156 per one U.S. dollar. We entered into a similar foreign exchange
contract in January 2008 in order to fund our acquisition of DePuy Orthopaedics’
Chaumont, France facility (the “Chaumont Facility”), which was payable in
Euros. The net result of the above transactions was a gain of $2.4
million, $1.6 million of which was recorded in the first quarter of 2008 as
Other Income, Net.
- 36
-
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
The
effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2009 was 31.5% compared to 39.6% for
the first quarter of 2008. The 2009 first quarter effective tax rate
is less than the U.S. federal statutory rate as it includes the favorable impact
of the Swiss tax holiday and federal research and development tax
credit. The 2008 first quarter effective tax rate exceeds the U.S.
federal statutory rate as it included the impact of $2.2 million of acquired
IPR&D written off in connection with the Precimed acquisition which was not
deductible for tax purposes. Additionally, the 2008 first quarter
effective tax rate is higher due to expiration of the federal research and
development tax credit at the end of 2007 which was not reinstated until the
fourth quarter of 2008. We expect our effective tax rate (excluding
discrete items) to be approximately 32% for 2009.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
April 3,
|
January 2,
|
|||||||
(Dollars
in millions)
|
2009
|
2009
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents(a)
|
$ | 15.1 | $ | 22.1 | ||||
Working
capital
(b)
|
$ | 162.6 | $ | 142.2 | ||||
Current
ratio (b)
|
3.1:1.0
|
2.5:1.0
|
(a)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents decreased primarily due to normal capital
expenditures as well as cash payments in connection with our compensation
programs accrued in 2008.
|
(b)
|
Our
working capital and current ratio increased in comparison to year-end
amounts as cash flow from operations during the quarter were used to fund
working capital accounts (i.e. increases in receivables and inventory,
decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses) and due to the timing
of payments. We anticipate working off these excess capital
account levels over the next several
quarters.
|
Revolving Line of
Credit - We have a senior credit facility (the “Credit Facility”)
consisting of a $235 million revolving line of credit, which can be increased to
$335 million upon our request. The Credit Facility also contains a
$15 million letter of credit subfacility and a $15 million swingline
subfacility. The Credit Facility is secured by our non-realty assets
including cash, accounts and notes receivable, and inventories, and has an
expiration date of May 22, 2012 with a one-time option to extend to April 1,
2013 if no default has occurred. Interest rates under the Credit
Facility are, at our option, based upon the current prime rate or the LIBOR rate
plus a margin that varies with our leverage ratio. If interest is
paid based upon the prime rate, the applicable margin is between minus 1.25% and
0.00%. If interest is paid based upon the LIBOR rate, the applicable
margin is between 1.00% and 2.00%. We are required to pay a
commitment fee between 0.125% and 0.250% per annum on the unused portion of the
Credit Facility based on our leverage ratio.
The
Credit Facility contains limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness,
limitations on the incurrence of liens and licensing of intellectual property,
limitations on investments and restrictions on certain
payments. Except to the extent paid for by common equity of
Greatbatch or paid for out of cash on hand, the Credit Facility limits the
amount paid for acquisitions in total to $100 million. The
restrictions on payments, among other things, limit repurchases of our stock to
$60 million and limits the ability of the Company to make cash payments upon
conversion of CSN II. These limitations can be waived upon the
Company’s request and approval of a simple majority of the lenders.
The
Credit Facility also requires us to maintain a ratio of adjusted EBITDA, as
defined in the credit agreement, to interest expense of at least 3.00 to 1.00,
and a total leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement, of not greater
than 5.00 to 1.00 from May 22, 2007 through September 29, 2009 and not greater
than 4.50 to 1.00 from September 30, 2009 and thereafter. As of April
3, 2009, we are in compliance with the required covenants.
- 37
-
The
Credit Facility contains customary events of default. Upon the
occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default, a majority of the
lenders may declare the outstanding advances and all other obligations under the
Credit Facility immediately due and payable.
The
weighted average interest rate on borrowings under our revolving line of credit
as of April 3, 2009, which does not include the impact of the interest rate
swaps described below, was 2.7%. Interest rates reset based upon the
six-month ($111 million), three-month ($2 million), two-month ($13 million) and
one-month ($5 million) LIBOR rate.
As of
April 3, 2009, we had $104 million available under our revolving line of
credit. Based upon our current capital needs, we anticipate utilizing
free cash flow (cash flow from operations less capital expenditures) to make
principal payments on our revolving line of credit. As of April 3,
2009, we have outstanding $30.5 million of 2.25% convertible subordinated notes
due 2013, which contain a put option exercisable on June 15, 2010. We
believe that our cash flow from operations, as well as availability under our
existing line of credit will be sufficient to fund the repayment of these notes
if put to us. The remaining $197.8 million of convertible
subordinated notes are not due until 2013 and do not have a put
option.
Operating
activities - Net
cash flows from operating activities for the first quarter of 2009 were $0.06
million, as net income excluding non-cash items (i.e. depreciation,
amortization, stock-based compensation, non-cash gains/losses) was used to fund
working capital accounts (i.e. increases in receivables and inventory, decreases
in accounts payable and accrued expenses) and due to the timing of
payments. We anticipate working off these excess capital account
levels over the next several quarters which will generate increased cash flow
from operations.
We
anticipate that cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our
operating, capital expenditure and debt service needs, other than for any
potential acquisitions. Included in accounts receivable as of April
3, 2009 is a $14.3 million value added tax (“VAT”) receivable with the French
government related to inventory purchases for the Chaumont
Facility. Subsequent to the end of the first quarter, we received
approval for the payment of $6.4 million of this receivable, which is expected
to be collected in the second quarter of 2009. The
remaining balance of this receivable is now subject to the normal VAT payment
cycle, generally 30 – 60 days after filing the claim. This receivable
is denominated in Euros and is subject to foreign currency risk, which could be
material.
Investing
activities - Net
cash used in investing activities for the first quarter of 2009 were $5.2
million and was primarily related to routine capital expenditures.
Our
current expectation for the remainder of 2009 is that capital spending will be
in the range of $25 million to $35 million, of which approximately half is
discretionary in nature. These purchases relate to routine
investments to support our internal growth and maintain our technology
leadership. We anticipate cash flow from operations will be
sufficient to fund these capital expenditures. We regularly engage in
discussions relating to potential acquisitions. Going forward, we
will continue to consider strategically targeted and opportunistic
acquisitions.
Financing
activities - Cash flow used for financing activities for the first
quarter of 2009 primarily related to $1.0 million net repayment of long-term
borrowings on our revolving line of credit. We continually assess our
financing facilities and capital structure to ensure liquidity and capital
levels are sufficient to meet our strategic objectives. In the
future, we may adjust our capital structure in order to maximize our funding and
as funding opportunities present themselves. Our current expectation is that we
will use excess cash flow from operations to fund routine capital expenditures
and pay down long-term debt.
- 38
-
Capital
Structure - At
April 3, 2009, our capital structure consisted of $228.2 million of convertible
subordinated notes, $131.0 million of debt under our revolving line of credit
and 23.2 million shares of common stock outstanding. Additionally, we
had $15.1 million in cash and cash equivalents which is sufficient to meet our
short-term operating cash needs. If necessary, we have access to $104
million under our available line of credit and are authorized to issue 100
million shares of common stock and 100 million shares of preferred
stock. The market value of our outstanding common stock since our
initial public offering has exceeded our book value; accordingly, we believe
that if needed we can access public markets to raise additional
capital. Our capital structure allows us to support our internal
growth and provides liquidity for corporate development
initiatives.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We have
no off-balance sheet arrangements within the meaning of Item 303(a)(4) of
Regulation S-K.
Contractual
Obligations
The
following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations at April 3,
2009:
Payments due by period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
|
Total
|
Remainder
2009
|
2010-2011
|
2012-2013
|
After 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
Long-Term
Debt Obligations (a)
|
$ | 393,521 | $ | 7,290 | $ | 48,863 | $ | 337,368 | $ | - | ||||||||||
Operating
Lease Obligations
(b)
|
12,596 | 2,041 | 4,059 | 3,497 | 2,999 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase
Obligations (b)
|
15,636 | 15,636 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Foreign
Currency Contracts
(b)
|
6,061 | 6,061 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Pension
Obligations (c)
|
9,273 | 505 | 1,523 | 1,925 | 5,320 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 437,087 | $ | 31,533 | $ | 54,445 | $ | 342,790 | $ | 8,319 |
(a)
|
Includes
the annual interest expense on our convertible debentures of 2.25%, which
is paid semi-annually. These amounts assume the June 2010 put
option is exercised on the $30.5 million of 2.25% convertible subordinated
notes outstanding issued in May 2003. Also includes the
expected interest expense on the $131.0 million outstanding on our line of
credit based upon the period end weighted average interest rate of 3.5%,
which includes the impact of our interest rate swaps
outstanding. See Note 6 – “Long-Term Debt” of the Notes to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
about our long-term debt
obligations.
|
(b)
|
See
Note 12 – “Commitments and Contingencies” of the Notes to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our
operating lease, purchase obligations and foreign currency
contracts.
|
(c)
|
See
Note 7 – “Pension Plans” of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information about our pension plan
obligations. These amounts do not include any potential future
contributions to our pension plan that may be necessary if the rate of
return earned on pension plan assets is not sufficient to fund the rate of
increase of our pension liability. The Company is currently
evaluating the alternatives available to reduce the underfunded status of
its defined benefit pension plans, which could include making a cash
contribution. As of January 2, 2009, the latest measurement date, our
actuarially determined pension liability exceeded the plans assets by $6.0
million.
|
The above
table does not reflect $4.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits as we are
uncertain as to if or when such amounts may be settled. Refer to Note 11 –
“Income Taxes” of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information about these unrecognized tax benefits.
- 39
-
Litigation
We are
party to various legal actions arising in the normal course of
business. While we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of any
such pending activities will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated
results of operations, financial position or cash flows, litigation is subject
to inherent uncertainties. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur,
there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact in the period in which
the ruling occurs.
As
previously reported, on June 12, 2006, Enpath Medical, Inc. (“Enpath”), a
subsidiary of the Company, was named as defendant in a patent infringement
action filed by Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. (“Pressure Products”)
in which Pressure Products alleged that Enpath’s FlowGuard™ valved introducer,
which has been on the market for more than four years, and Enpath’s ViaSeal™
prototype introducer, which has not been sold, infringes claims in Pressure
Products patents. After trial, a jury found that Enpath infringed the
Pressure Products patents, but not willfully, and awarded damages in the amount
of $1.1 million. Enpath has appealed the judgment to the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and oral arguments were heard before that
tribunal on April 21, 2009. As a result of a post-trial motion and
pending the appeal, Enpath is permitted to continue to sell FlowGuard™ provided
that Enpath pays into an escrow fund a royalty of between $1.50 and $2.25 for
each sale of a FlowGuard™ valved introducer. The amount accrued as
escrow during the first quarter of 2009 was $0.6 million and $1.1 million in
total as of April 3, 2009. The trial court has scheduled a hearing
for June 16, 2009 to consider whether to continue to permit sales of FlowGuard™
pending the decision on the appeal.
During
2002, a former non-medical customer commenced an action alleging that Greatbatch
had used proprietary information of the customer to develop certain
products. We believe the Company has meritorious defenses and are
vigorously defending the matter. The potential risk of loss is up to
$1.7 million.
Inflation
We
utilize certain critical raw materials (including precious metals) in our
products that we obtain from a limited number of suppliers due to the
technically challenging requirements of the supplied product and/or the lengthy
process required to qualify these materials with our customers. We
cannot quickly establish additional or replacement suppliers for these materials
because of these requirements. Our results may be negatively impacted
by an increase in the price of these critical raw materials. This
risk is partially mitigated as many of the supply agreements with our customers
allow us to partially adjust prices for the impact of any raw material price
increases and the supply agreements with our vendors have final one-time buy
clauses to meet a long-term need. Historically, raw material price
increases have not materially impacted our results of operations.
Impact of Recently Issued
Accounting Standards
In
December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers' Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” This FSP provides
guidance on disclosures about plan assets of defined benefit pension or other
postretirement plans and requires more transparency about the assets held by
retirement plan and the concentrations of risk in those plans. This
FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2009. Accordingly, we will make the disclosures required by this FSP
beginning in fiscal year 2010.
Application of Critical
Accounting Estimates
Our
unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are based on the selection
of accounting policies and the application of significant accounting estimates,
some of which require management to make significant assumptions. We
believe that some of the more critical estimates and related assumptions that
affect our financial condition and results of operations are in the areas of
inventories, goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets, tangible
long-lived assets, share-based compensation and income taxes. For
further information, refer to Item 7 “Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Item 8 “Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 2, 2009. During the three months ended April 3, 2009, we did
not change or adopt any new accounting policies that had a material effect on
our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements other than our accounting for
our convertible subordinated notes as follows:
- 40
-
During
the first quarter of 2009, we were required to adopt FSP APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments that May be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement).” This FSP requires issuers of convertible debt
instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion, such as our CSN II as
described in Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, to
separately account for the liability and equity components of those instruments
in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate
when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. As a result,
we first determined the carrying amount of the liability component of CSN II by
measuring the fair value of a similar liability that does not have the
associated conversion option. The carrying amount of the conversion option
was then determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from
the initial proceeds received from the issuance of CSN II. The carrying
amount of the conversion option was recorded as Additional Paid-In Capital with
an offset to Long-Term Debt. The carrying amount of the conversion
option is being amortized to Interest Expense using the effective interest rate
method over the expected life of a similar liability that does not have the
associated conversion option.
Deferred
financing fees incurred in connection with the issuance of CSN II, previously
recorded as Other Assets, were allocated to the liability and equity
components in proportion to the allocation of proceeds between the liability and
equity components. The deferred financing fees allocated to the debt
component are being amortized to Interest Expense over the expected life of
CSN II. The deferred financing fees allocated to the equity
component were recorded as an offset to Stockholders’ Equity.
This FSP
requires retrospective restatement for all prior periods presented in financial
statements. Accordingly, the 2008 Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements presented in this report have been retroactively adjusted to reflect
the accounting for FSP APB 14-1 as if it were in effect as of the date CSN II
was originally issued. See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for information on the impact of FSP APB 14-1 on the 2008
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Forward-Looking
Statements
Some of
the statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other written
and oral statements made from time to time by us and our representatives are not
statements of historical or current fact. As such, they are “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. We have based these forward-looking statements on our
current expectations, which are subject to known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. They include statements relating to:
|
•
|
future
sales, expenses and profitability;
|
|
•
|
the
future development and expected growth of our business and the markets we
operate in;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to successfully execute our business model and our business
strategy;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to identify trends within the implantable medical devices, medical
components, and commercial power sources markets and to offer products and
services that meet the changing needs of those
markets;
|
|
•
|
projected
capital expenditures; and
|
•
|
trends
in government regulation.
|
You can
identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,”
“should,” “could,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,”
“estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these
terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only
predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially from
those suggested by these forward-looking statements. In evaluating
these statements and our prospects generally, you should carefully consider the
factors set forth below. All forward-looking statements attributable
to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety
by these cautionary factors and to others contained throughout this
report. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking
statements after the date of this report or to conform these statements to
actual results.
- 41
-
Although
it is not possible to create a comprehensive list of all factors that may cause
actual results to differ from the results expressed or implied by our
forward-looking statements or that may affect our future results, some of these
factors include the following: dependence upon a limited number of customers,
product obsolescence, inability to market current or future products, pricing
pressure from customers, reliance on third party suppliers for raw materials,
products and subcomponents, fluctuating operating results, inability to maintain
high quality standards for our products, challenges to our intellectual property
rights, product liability claims, inability to successfully consummate and
integrate acquisitions, unsuccessful expansion into new markets, competition,
inability to obtain licenses to key technology, regulatory changes or
consolidation in the healthcare industry, and other risks and uncertainties that
arise from time to time as described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
and other periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
We have
significant foreign operations in France, Mexico and Switzerland, which exposes
the Company to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations due to transactions
denominated in Euros, Pesos and Swiss Francs, respectively. We
continuously evaluate our foreign currency risk and will take action from time
to time in order to best mitigate these risks, which includes the use of various
derivative instruments such as forward currency exchange contracts. A
hypothetical 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to our most
significant foreign currency exposures would have had an impact of approximately
$10 million on our annual sales. This amount is not indicative of the
hypothetical net earnings impact due to partially offsetting impacts on cost of
sales and operating expenses in those currencies. We estimate that
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations during the first quarter of 2009,
reduced sales in comparison to the first quarter of 2008 by approximately $3
million.
In
December 2007, we entered into a forward contract to purchase 80,000,000 CHF, at
an exchange rate of 1.1389 CHF per one U.S. dollar, in order to partially fund
the acquisition of Precimed, which closed in January 2008 and was payable in
Swiss Francs. In January 2008, we entered into an additional forward
contract to purchase 20,000,000 CHF at an exchange rate of 1.1156 per one U.S.
dollar. We entered into a similar foreign exchange contract in
January 2008 in order to fund the acquisition of the Chaumont Facility, which
closed in February 2008 and was payable in Euros. The net result of the
above transactions was a gain of $2.4 million, $1.6 million of which was
recorded in 2008 as Other Income.
In
February 2009, we entered into a forward contract to purchase 10 million Mexican
pesos per month from March 2009 to December 2009 at an exchange rate of 14.85
pesos per one U.S. dollar. This contract was entered into in order to
hedge the risk of peso-denominated payments associated with the operations at
the Company’s Tijuana, Mexico facility. This contract was accounted
for as a cash flow hedge and had a fair value of $0.4 million as of April 3,
2009.
We
translate all assets and liabilities of our foreign operations of Precimed and
the Chaumont Facility at the period-end exchange rate and translate sales and
expenses at the average exchange rates in effect during the
period. The net effect of these translation adjustments is recorded
in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as Comprehensive Income
(Loss). The translation adjustment for the first quarter of 2009 was
a $3.9 million loss. The aggregate translation adjustment as of April
3, 2009 is a loss of $4.1 million. Translation adjustments are not
adjusted for income taxes as they relate to permanent investments in our foreign
subsidiaries. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses included
in Other (Income) Expense, Net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Income amounted to expense of $0.2 million during
the first quarter of 2008. A hypothetical 10% change in the value of
the U.S. dollar in relation to our most significant foreign currency net assets
would have had an impact of approximately $9 million on our foreign net assets
as of April 3, 2009.
- 42
-
At April
3, 2009, we had $131.0 million outstanding debt under our revolving line of
credit that bears interest at fluctuating market rates based upon the LIBOR
rate, thus exposing the Company to interest rate fluctuations. To
help mitigate this risk, during 2008, we entered into three notional receive
floating-pay fixed interest rate swaps indexed to the six-month LIBOR
rate. The objective of these swaps is to hedge against potential
changes in cash flows on the portion of our revolving line of credit indexed to
the six-month LIBOR rate. No credit risk was hedged. The
receive variable leg of the swap and the variable rate paid on the revolving
line of credit bear the same rate of interest, excluding the credit spread, and
reset and pay interest on the same dates.
Information
regarding the Company’s outstanding interest rate swaps is as
follows:
Current
|
Fair
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Pay
|
receive
|
value
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Type of
|
Notional
|
Start
|
End
|
fixed
|
floating
|
April 3,
|
|||||||||||||||
Instrument
|
hedge
|
amount
|
date
|
date
|
rate
|
rate
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap
|
Cash flow
|
$ | 80,000 |
3/5/2008
|
7/7/2010
|
3.09 | % | 1.75 | % | $ | (1,354 | ) | |||||||||
Interest rate swap
|
Cash flow
|
18,000 |
12/18/2008
|
12/18/2010
|
2.00 | % | 2.17 | % | (50 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest rate swap
|
Cash flow
|
50,000 |
7/7/2010
|
7/7/2011
|
2.16 | % |
6M LIBOR
|
(7 | ) | ||||||||||||
$ | 148,000 | 2.64 | % | $ | (1,411 | ) |
The
estimated fair value of the interest rate swap agreements represents the amount
the Company expects to pay to terminate the contracts. No portion of
the change in fair value of the interest rate swaps during the first three
months of 2009 was considered ineffective. The amount recorded as
additional interest expense during the first three months of 2009 related to
interest rate swaps was $0.2 million.
A
hypothetical 10% change in the LIBOR interest rate to the remaining $33 million
of floating rate debt would have had an impact of approximately $0.07 million on
our annual interest expense. This amount is not indicative of the
hypothetical net earnings impact due to partially offsetting impacts on our
short-term investments and cash and cash equivalents to interest
income.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
a.
Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures.
Our
management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) related to
the recording, processing, summarization and reporting of information in our
reports that we file with the SEC as of April 3, 2009. These
disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to provide reasonable
assurance that material information relating to us, including our subsidiaries,
is made known to our management, including these officers, by other of our
employees, and that this information is recorded, processed, summarized,
evaluated and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the
SEC’s rules and forms.
Based on
their evaluation, as of April 3, 2009, our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective.
- 43
-
b. Changes in Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting.
We
completed the following acquisitions during 2008:
|
·
|
P
Medical Holding SA on January 7,
2008
|
|
·
|
DePuy
Orthopaedics’ Chaumont, France manufacturing facility on February 11,
2008
|
We
believe that the internal controls and procedures of the above mentioned
acquisitions are reasonably likely to have materially affected our internal
control over financial reporting for the quarter in which they occurred and
thereafter. We are currently in the process of incorporating the
internal controls and procedures of these acquisitions into our internal
controls over financial reporting.
The
Company continues to extend its Section 404 compliance program under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”) and the applicable rules and regulations
under such Act to include these acquisitions. However, the Company
excluded the 2008 acquisitions listed above from management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 2,
2009, as permitted by the guidance issued by the Office of the Chief Accountant
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company will report on
its assessment of the internal controls of its combined operations within the
time period provided by the Act and the applicable SEC rules and regulations
concerning business combinations.
There
were no other changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting during our last fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, internal control over financial reporting, other than the
above mentioned acquisitions.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Refer to
those legal proceedings as previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for
the year ended January 2, 2009.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS.
There
have been no material changes in risk factors as previously disclosed in the
Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2009.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS.
None.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS.
None.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
- 44
-
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS.
See the
Exhibit Index for a list of those exhibits filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: May
12, 2009
|
GREATBATCH,
INC.
|
||
By
|
/s/ Thomas J. Hook
|
||
Thomas
J. Hook
|
|||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|||
By
|
/s/ Thomas J. Mazza
|
||
Thomas
J. Mazza
|
|||
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|||
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|||
By
|
/s/ Marco F. Benedetti
|
||
Marco
F. Benedetti
|
|||
Corporate
Controller
|
|||
(Principal
Accounting
Officer)
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 27, 2008).
|
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29,
2002).
|
|
31.1*
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act.
|
|
31.2*
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act.
|
|
32*
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
* - Filed
herewith.
- 45
-